Podcasts about clarivate analytics

Joy Owango is an award-winning Founding Director of the Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa), a registered trust in Kenya established in 2006. TCC Africa is the first African-based training center focused on teaching effective communication skills to scientists. Ms Joy Owango is also the project lead at the Africa PID Alliance, an organization whose mission is to secure the future of African Innovation, Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Heritage. Ms. Owango has a proven history of working in higher education across private, university, and non-governmental sectors. She was a successful higher education practitioner with Clarivate Analytics and has collaborated with the governments of Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Mauritius, Ghana, Senegal, Burkina Faso, among others. As the Director of TCC Africa, she is currently working with 15 African countries that have committed to spending 1% of their GDP on higher education and research and development. Her achievements in enhancing higher education and research capacity in Africa were recognized by The Organization of Women in Science for the Developing World by UNESCO during the 2021 International Day for Women in Science. Find more podcast episodes here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://access2perspectives.pubpub.org/podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Host:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dr Jo Havemann⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ORCID iD ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠0000-0002-6157-1494 ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Editing: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Ebuka Ezeike⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Music:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Alex Lustig⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, produced by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Kitty Kat ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ License:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)   ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ At Access 2 Perspectives, we guide you in your complete research workflow toward state-of-the-art research practices and in full compliance with funding and publishing requirements. Leverage your research projects to higher efficiency and increased collaboration opportunities while fostering your explorative spirit and joy. Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://access2perspectives.pubpub.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/access2perspectives/message

In today's episode, we're talking with Jonathan Adams, Chief Scientist, Institute of Scientific Information, a part of Clarivate.  Jonathan is interviewed by Matthew Ismail, a Conference Director and Editor in Chief of the Charleston Briefings. Jonathan Adams is a jack of all trades in the scholarly communication field. He is a scientist who taught in higher education and published a successful book in the field of biology. He has been an Assistant Secretary and Science Policy Advisor to the UK government. He has founded a startup related to his research and teaching. He has been in charge of research evaluation at Digital Science and Thomson Reuters. And now he is Chief Scientist at ISI with Clarivate Analytics. He is very well qualified to discuss the research landscape! In this podcast, Jonathan and Matthew discuss the recent report published by ISI, U.S. Research Trends:  The Impact Of Globalization and Collaboration. This report discusses many interesting topics, but perhaps the most relevant finding is that US STEM research, while still strong, is no longer dominant in the world. Jonathan and Matthew discuss the factors that have made the US less competitive in STEM research. Social Media: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-ismail-1a6282a/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-adams-5a02188b/ Keywords: #Clarivate, #WebofScience, #data, #DataScientists, #Innovation, #technology, #learning, #education, #knowledge #research, #collaboration, #libraries, #librarianship, #LibraryNeeds, #LibraryLove, #AcademicPublishing, #ScholarlyPublishing, #publishing, #podcasts

Russel Reiter, Ph.D. is a Professor of Cell Biology in the department of Cell Systems and Anatomy at UT Health, San Antonio. His research is centred around the impact of melatonin in biological systems. He is the Editor-in-Chief of Melatonin Research and on the Editorial Board of over 35 other journals. He is the recipient of numerous awards including three honorary doctor of medicine degrees and the Presidential Distinguished Scholar Award from UT Health San Antonio. He is also on the Clarivate Analytics list of Highly Cited Scientists. At the time of recording, Professor Reiter's papers have been cited over 174,000 times.-Russel's Publications-Follow My WorkWebsiteConsultationInstagramYoutubeSpotifyApple PodcastsLinkedin

In today's episode we speak to Nagaraju Bandaru who is the Chief Technology Officer at Mosaic. He is a product executive with 20+ years of experience in innovation, architecture, product delivery, and operations and has led growth and transformation initiatives for startups, private equity groups and large public companies. Prior to Mosaic he served as VP and Chief Technology Officer of Clarivate Analytics formerly known as Thomson Reuters and held executive product development in customer care leadership positions at Intuit no less. He holds a Masters Degree in Computer Science from University of Hyderabad. We kick off by asking Nagaraju to tell us about him, what brought him to this point and what has been his journey that has brought him here: His father was a government worker so his family moved every few years Didn't have much friends but learnt new languages often Oldest of three Always good at solving problems He saw two people companies turn into huge multinationals Covad shaped him into the leader he is now At Intuit he realized he was a technologist at heart Mosaic has planted a huge foundation, great team with the ability to make impact Next, we ask Nagaraju to tell us how important the fundamentals are for leadership. Driven for results Goals and how to measure them Active coaching We then ask Nagaraju why he is passionate about the meaningful work at Mosaic? Clean energy for all Huge upfront costs to getting your home energy efficient Being able to make that financing available We ask Nagaraju to tell us about the journey for a homeowner to become energy efficient. Green energy We make the point of financing easy Taking the hassle away from the homeowner Expanded to home improvement companies We then ask Nagaraju about the innovations around his industry? 18 month deferred interest loan Loans to finance their clean energy projects Battery becoming more mainstream Moving on, we ask Nagaraju what does the modern home of the future look like? 131 trillion dollars Solar alone can make a huge dent The ecosystem if very large Financing is the biggest part Next we ask him about culture and leadership and what it means to him? It's important how you inspire your time The ability to think strategically Building a high performing team Drive for results Innovative leadership Inspiring teams through your action Trust - show up everyday Your good judgement and your decision making Customer empathy Team work Equality and diversity Empathy and care Lastly, we ask Nagaraju what gadget he can not live without? His drone Ariel photographer --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/gloabl-tech-leaders/message

On this episode of CISO to CISO we would like to welcome Chris Houlder, Head of Global CyberSecurity at BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. With nearly 25 years of experience spanning information security, team management, information technology and product/software security, Chris has been developing and executing strategies to solve complex security challenges and leading operational and company changes. Previously, Chris served as CISO and lead teams at Clarivate Analytics and Autodesk. Chris current serves as a board member for Rapticore, also a venture advisor for YL Ventures.

Eric Kavanagh CEO at The Bloor Group Guests: Nir Livneh CEO & Founder, Equalum  Rick Sherman Managing Partner at Athena IT Solutions Eugene Burke Program Director, Content & Shared Services at Clarivate Analytics

  Este programa traz uma pitada de como a Genômica é uma ciência transversal e emergente, contribuindo para desafiar as fronteiras do conhecimento de outras áreas científicas, como melhoramento genético da agricultura tropical convencional, citogenética e evolução biológica!  Há grandes projetos e linhas de pesquisa em ação que têm a mão direta ou indireta da Genômica. Para entender melhor isso, os divulgadores científicos Vinícius Alves e Adriane Wasko conversaram com Ana Cristina Brasileiro e Cesar Martins. Ana é engenheira florestal da Embrapa de Brasília e tem experiência de pesquisa em Genômica de Plantas. Enquanto Cesar é biólogo e professor da Unesp de Botucatu, com experiência de pesquisa em Citogenética e Evolução Genômica Animal. Áudios da pesquisadora Lygia Pereira e do jornalista científico Marcelo Leite foram cedidos para abertura do programa. A seguir, você tem o roteiro completo para acompanhar a conversa.  Sejam todos bem vindos ao primeiro episódio de “#113 Essa tal de Genômica” do podcast Oxigênio! Obs.: na arte de chamada do episódio, a foto (ao fundo) de bioinformática com análise de genoma é do Ivan Rodrigo Wolf. As demais imagens e também as trilhas sonoras são de bancos de uso público. LYGIA: Um genoma é uma grande receita que a natureza segue para transformar a primeira célula que a gente já foi em um ser humano.. trilhões de células especializadas e organizadas. MARCELO LEITE: Eu gosto de pensar no genoma mais como um ecossistema do que como um programa de computador.  VINÍCIUS: Independente da metáfora que você preferir, provavelmente você já deve ter ouvido falar sobre genoma e também sobre a Genômica, que é a área da ciência que estuda os genomas. ADRIANE: Genômica é filha da Genética e ambas são áreas que conversam entre si, mas não são a mesma coisa, cada uma tem as suas próprias características.     VINÍCIUS: Basicamente, podemos dizer que a Genética é a ciência que estuda a estrutura, a função, a variação e a hereditariedade dos genes, enquanto a Genômica estuda os mesmos aspectos só que sobre um genoma, ou seja, sobre o conjunto de genes, que forma um ser vivo. ADRIANE: O último relatório de avaliação da pesquisa científica realizado pela empresa Clarivate Analytics, em 2018, indicou que a Genômica é uma das áreas que mais crescem em publicações científicas no mundo.   É como se os conhecimentos científicos de Genômica dobrassem a cada 2 anos em uma das mais reconhecidas plataformas de revistas científicas internacionais, a Web of Science.  VINÍCIUS: Realmente é muita coisa né? E isso acontece também porque a Genômica não caminha sozinha. As técnicas e os dados da Genômica podem se associar a outras linhas de pesquisa básica ou aplicada. A agricultura tropical, a evolução biológica, a conservação de espécies e a saúde pública são algumas das áreas em que a Genômica pode atuar. ADRIANE: O fato da Genômica ser uma área emergente e interativa no ambiente de pesquisa não significa que seus avanços cheguem até a sociedade brasileira.  VINÍCIUS: Nos anos 2000, a realização do projeto genoma humano nos Estados Unidos e o sequenciamento do genoma da bactéria Xylella fastidiosa, que causa doença em plantações de citrus, levaram o termo GENOMA para os noticiários, dando um grande reforço para o jornalismo científico, inclusive. Mas, como comenta o jornalista científico Marcelo Leite, após essa época, a Genômica perdeu um pouco a evidência nos noticiários.  ADRIANE: Mesmo que a gente não veja ou ouça a palavra Genoma nas mídias, a área da Genômica continua avançando e pode ter um grande impacto em nossas vidas. Por exemplo, o sequenciamento do novo coronavírus por pesquisadoras da USP, em parceria com Instituto Adolfo Lutz e Universidade de Oxford, que foi realizado em apenas 48h, foi de grande importância para os primeiros estudos sobre o vírus, ainda no começo da pandemia!  VINÍCIUS: Bem lembrado, Adriane. E também recentemente o Nobel de Química premiou d...

Este programa traz uma pitada de como a Genômica é uma ciência transversal e emergente, contribuindo para desafiar as fronteiras do conhecimento de outras áreas científicas, como melhoramento genético da agricultura tropical convencional, citogenética e evolução biológica!  Há grandes projetos e linhas de pesquisa em ação que têm a mão direta ou indireta da Genômica. Para entender melhor isso, os divulgadores científicos Vinícius Alves e Adriane Wasko conversaram com Ana Cristina Brasileiro e Cesar Martins. Ana é engenheira florestal da Embrapa de Brasília e tem experiência de pesquisa em Genômica de Plantas. Enquanto Cesar é biólogo e professor da Unesp de Botucatu, com experiência de pesquisa em Citogenética e Evolução Genômica Animal. Áudios da pesquisadora Lygia Pereira e do jornalista científico Marcelo Leite foram cedidos para abertura do programa. A seguir, você tem o roteiro completo para acompanhar a conversa.  Sejam todos bem vindos ao primeiro episódio de “#113 Essa tal de Genômica” do podcast Oxigênio! Obs.: na arte de chamada do episódio, a foto (ao fundo) de bioinformática com análise de genoma é do Ivan Rodrigo Wolf. As demais imagens e também as trilhas sonoras são de bancos de uso público. LYGIA: Um genoma é uma grande receita que a natureza segue para transformar a primeira célula que a gente já foi em um ser humano.. trilhões de células especializadas e organizadas. MARCELO LEITE: Eu gosto de pensar no genoma mais como um ecossistema do que como um programa de computador.  VINÍCIUS: Independente da metáfora que você preferir, provavelmente você já deve ter ouvido falar sobre genoma e também sobre a Genômica, que é a área da ciência que estuda os genomas. ADRIANE: Genômica é filha da Genética e ambas são áreas que conversam entre si, mas não são a mesma coisa, cada uma tem as suas próprias características.     VINÍCIUS: Basicamente, podemos dizer que a Genética é a ciência que estuda a estrutura, a função, a variação e a hereditariedade dos genes, enquanto a Genômica estuda os mesmos aspectos só que sobre um genoma, ou seja, sobre o conjunto de genes, que forma um ser vivo. ADRIANE: O último relatório de avaliação da pesquisa científica realizado pela empresa Clarivate Analytics, em 2018, indicou que a Genômica é uma das áreas que mais crescem em publicações científicas no mundo.   É como se os conhecimentos científicos de Genômica dobrassem a cada 2 anos em uma das mais reconhecidas plataformas de revistas científicas internacionais, a Web of Science.  VINÍCIUS: Realmente é muita coisa né? E isso acontece também porque a Genômica não caminha sozinha. As técnicas e os dados da Genômica podem se associar a outras linhas de pesquisa básica ou aplicada. A agricultura tropical, a evolução biológica, a conservação de espécies e a saúde pública são algumas das áreas em que a Genômica pode atuar. ADRIANE: O fato da Genômica ser uma área emergente e interativa no ambiente de pesquisa não significa que seus avanços cheguem até a sociedade brasileira.  VINÍCIUS: Nos anos 2000, a realização do projeto genoma humano nos Estados Unidos e o sequenciamento do genoma da bactéria Xylella fastidiosa, que causa doença em plantações de citrus, levaram o termo GENOMA para os noticiários, dando um grande reforço para o jornalismo científico, inclusive. Mas, como comenta o jornalista científico Marcelo Leite, após essa época, a Genômica perdeu um pouco a evidência nos noticiários.  ADRIANE: Mesmo que a gente não veja ou ouça a palavra Genoma nas mídias, a área da Genômica continua avançando e pode ter um grande impacto em nossas vidas. Por exemplo, o sequenciamento do novo coronavírus por pesquisadoras da USP, em parceria com Instituto Adolfo Lutz e Universidade de Oxford, que foi realizado em apenas 48h, foi de grande importância para os primeiros estudos sobre o vírus, ainda no começo da pandemia!  VINÍCIUS: Bem lembrado, Adriane. E também recentemente o Nobel de Química premiou duas p...

Flávio Kapczinski, um dos pesquisadores mais influentes do mundo. Nesse episódio falamos sobre ciência, evolução da pesquisa em saúde mental e sobre o cenário de negacionismo e retrocesso em que vivemos. F. Kapczinski é professor da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) e coordenador do Programa de Tratamento do Transtorno de Humor Bipolar do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), atualmente licenciado da UFRGS para realizar pesquisa de pós-doutorado na McMaster University, no Canadá. Levantamento realizado recentemente pela consultoria britânica Clarivate Analytics, elaborada com base em dados da plataforma Web of Science, apontou o professor Flávio como um dos mais influentes pesquisadores do mundo, ficando entre o 1% mais citados em artigos científicos no decorrer de uma década. Site: www.celg.org.br Email: celgcast@celg.org.br

Seja no diagnóstico, prognóstico, modelagem epidemiológica ou monitoramento do isolamento, a Inteligência Artificial é uma arma poderosa contra a pandemia, porém requer um debate ético constante. O quanto dados pessoais devem ser protegidos num cenário emergencial? Até que ponto decisões como quem deve ocupar UTI quando faltam vagas podem ser auxiliadas por tecnologia? Tudo isso são escolhas que a sociedade deve fazer em conjunto. Este e outros temas foram discutidos na quarta edição do Webinar Ciência USP: Covid-19: Inteligência Artificial na Medicina, promovido no Canal USP dia 27 de maio, e que você pode ouvir nesta versão podcast. Três convidados falaram no evento, com mediação da editora de Ciências do Jornal da USP Luiza Caires. São eles: Paulo Lotufo é médico e professor titular da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, diretor científico da Associação Paulista de Medicina e ex-superintendente do Hospital Universitário da USP. Realizou pós-doutorado na Universidade de Harvard (EUA), sendo autor de diversos livros de referência em medicina e epidemiologia. Em 2018, figurou na lista de pesquisadores mais influentes do mundo em suas respectivas áreas, em relatório da consultoria Clarivate Analytics. Alexandre Chiavegatto Filho Alexandre Chiavegatto Filho é economista e doutor em Saúde Pública pela USP e professor livre-docente da Faculdade de Saúde Pública (FSP) da USP, onde dirige do Laboratório de Big Data e Análise Preditiva (Labdaps), que tem como objetivo aplicar algoritmos preditivos de Inteligência Artificial a problemas importantes na área da saúde. Foi também professor convidado e pesquisador visitante na Universidade de Harvard (EUA). Marcela Mattiuzzo é advogada especializada em proteção de dados pessoais e sócia da VMCA Advogados nas áreas de antitruste e proteção de dados. Atualmente doutoranda na Faculdade de Direito (FD) da USP, foi assessora e chefe de gabinete da Presidência do Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade) e e pesquisadora visitante na Universidade de Yale (EUA). Produção: Luiza Caires e Kleison Paiva Mediação: Luiza Caires Edição de som: Guilherme Fiorentini

What are the new blockbuster medicines to watch? In this podcast we feature an article that examines the eleven medicines projected to enter the market in 2020 and achieve blockbuster status by 2024, according to a recent analysis by Clarivate Analytics' Cortellis Forecast Team. For the text version of this article visit dcatvci.org.Key topics: (see Chapter Markers)Blockbuster watch: Big PharmaNovo Nordisk's Rybelsus (semaglutide)AstraZeneca's and Daiichi Sankyo's Enhertu (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki)Immunomedics' sacituzumab govitecanBristol-Myers Squibb's liso-cel (or lisocabtagene maraleucel),Bristol-Myers Squibb's ozanimodNovartis' ofatumumab (subcutaneous)Novartis' inclisiranGilead Sciences' filgotinibAkebia Therapeutics', Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma's, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical's vadadustatBioMarin Pharmaceutical's ValroxBiohaven Pharmaceuticals' rimegepantSponsor: CordenPharmaLinks:Subscribe to our e-newsletter at www.dcatvci.orgFollow us on Twitter @DCATvciSupport the show (https://dcat.org/MemberApplication.htm)

Maru/Blue, a premium data services firm, launches Maru/Blue Forums, a value-driven panel management research tool powered by Maru’s proprietary technology, Maru/HUB. This gives clients the option to either manage and execute community research themselves or have assistance from Maru/Blue’s insights team. In today’s mergers and acquisitions, Clarivate Analytics, an insights and analytics company, completes its acquisition of Decision Resources Group, a healthcare research and consulting company, for $950 million.  In human capital news, EMI Solutions hires former Abt Associates and Kantar executive, Beth Teehan, as its new Chief Operating Officer.  Interpublic Group appoints Chad Engelgau as Chief Executive Officer of Acxiom, a data, technology and marketing services company.  In jobs, Cranbrook Search Consultants is looking to place a remote senior product manager in a SaaS market research company. Find Jamin Online: Email: jamin@happymr.com LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jaminbrazil Twitter: www.twitter.com/jaminbrazil Find Us Online: Twitter: www.twitter.com/happymrxp LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/happymarketresearch Facebook: www.facebook.com/happymrxp Website: www.happymr.com Sources:  Clarivate Analytics: https://clarivate.com/news/clarivate-analytics-closes-acquisition-of-decision-resources-group/ Maru/Blue: https://www.marublue.com/in-the-news/launch-of-forums-proprietary-panel-technology-platform-to-clients EMI Solutions: https://emi-rs.com/2020/02/26/emi-adds-to-executive-team/ Interpublic Group: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/02/28/1992901/0/en/Acxiom-Transitions-to-New-Global-CEO-Following-Successful-Integration.html Cranbrook Search Consultants: https://www.cranbrooksearch.com/open-jobs/#!/47abc9b0-f1da-417c-9b76-9d714dfa4480/detail  This Episode’s Sponsor: This episode is brought to you by Lookback. Lookback provides the tools to help UX teams to interact with real users, in real-time, and in real contexts. It's Lookback's mission to humanize technology by bridging the gap between end-users and product teams. Lookback's customers range from one-man teams building web and app experiences to the world's largest research organizations, collectively ensuring that humanity is at the core of every product decision. For more info, including demos of Lookback's offering, please visit www.lookback.io. 

全球专业信息服务提供商科睿唯安(Clarivate Analytics)发布了《德温特2020年度全球百强创新机构》报告。

全球专业信息服务提供商科睿唯安(Clarivate Analytics)发布了《德温特2020年度全球百强创新机构》报告。

Some statistics for 2019 are coming in in the trademark world. And in these particular statistics, one survey from CompuMark, a company from Clarivate Analytics and a company that does all of the Verna Law trademark searching, we're finding that for trademark infringement, main consequences were: customer confusion at 45% of respondents a loss of revenue due to trademark infringement for 38% of respondents to the survey and damage to brand reputation, which was 37% of respondents to the survey. Three quarters of trademark infringements also led to litigation, which doesn't really surprise me as litigation tends to keep climbing up every year. 40% of organizations have stated they spent between $50,000 to $249,000 on legal proceedings for trademark infringement. 46% of respondents said that a rebrand was a result of the infringement proceeding. Again, that doesn't really surprise me as defendants do tend to need to rebrand because, of course, they're the ones who are allegedly infringing. With brands filing infringement matters, what does this tell us? One, the registration of a trademark is very important. Recently we had a settlement where the settlement probably was not as good as we would've hoped for our client because the trademark registration was not in effect at the time of infringement. So that registration really does matter. Two, planning matters as well. If you're a smaller business, understand that you're going to be playing the same game as all of the big businesses when it comes to trademark infringement. So if you're going to register, you need to plan for what's going to happen if your mark is infringed, how you're going to budget, and how you're going to deal with the infringement. Sending a cease and desist letter in today's world generally doesn't get the same results as it used to. You're generally going to have to go to court and you're generally going to have to deal with high costs because right off the bat, most defense defendants today send file a motion to dismiss as a de rigeur part of their defense. So make sure that you're clear as a trademark owner what your costs are going to be in understanding this. Also if you're going to be creating any new brands, do your due diligence because doing your due diligence means that you can understand what brands are out there, what registered trademarks are out there, so that you can kind of fit your mark in this big virtual space that we have called trademark registrations. If your mark could infringe on somebody else's mark, maybe he should nip that in the bud from the very beginning rather than being a defendant in a trademark infringement suit. Three, when you're dealing with the budget, make sure you understand how your business can rebrand if you need to. That pivot is always going to be important. You always have to plan for every single situation when you're dealing with intellectual property. I'm Anthony Verna, managing partner of Verna Law, P.C, but chances are you already knew that. That's why you clicked on this video. Thank you for watching. See you soon.

Behavioral analytics platform, Verto Analytics, completes its new growth round of $16 million, adding momentum to strengthen its commercial operations, and continue research and development.  Confirmit, a global solutions provider for customer experience, employee experience, and market research has been named a Stevie Award Finalist for the Business Intelligence Solution category.  Clarus Commerce, a marketing and technology platform for premium loyalty program, has selected Medallia, a market leader in experience management, as its experience management platform of choice. In today’s mergers and acquisitions, Clarivate Analytics, an insights and analytics company, is to acquire Decision Resources Group, a premier provider of high-value data, analytics and insights products and services to the healthcare industry.  In human capital news, Irwin Broh & Associates, a full-service marketing research company, appoints Michael Mitrano and Jackie Rousseau-Anderson to its Board of Directors. Finally, in jobs, DoorDash looking to hire two UX Research Leads.  Find links to these stories in our show notes. For more detailed commentary, be sure to signup for our weekly newsletter at www.happymr.com. And that’s your daily briefing of marketing research news. Find Jamin Online: Email: jamin@happymr.com LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jaminbrazil Twitter: www.twitter.com/jaminbrazil Find Us Online: Twitter: www.twitter.com/happymrxp LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/happymarketresearch Facebook: www.facebook.com/happymrxp Website: www.happymr.com Sources:  Verto Analytics: https://vertoanalytics.com/verto-analytics-gains-16-million-in-latest-funding-boost/  Confirmit: https://www.confirmit.com/Company/News/  Medallia: https://www.medallia.com/press-release/clarus-commerce-chooses-medallia/   Clarivate Analytics: https://clarivate.com/news/clarivate-analytics-to-acquire-decision-resources-group-creating-a-leading-global-provider-of-data-driven-solutions-to-the-life-sciences-industry/  Scalehouse: https://www.scalehouse.consulting/irwin-broh-associates-names-jackie-rousseau-anderson-to-its-board-of-directors/   DoorDash: https://boards.greenhouse.io/doordash/jobs/1251863  This Episode’s Sponsor:This episode is brought to you by Lookback. Lookback provides the tools to help UX teams to interact with real users, in real time, and in real contexts. It's Lookback's mission to humanize technology by bridging the gap between end users and product teams. Lookback's customers range from one man teams building web and app experiences to the world's largest research organizations, collectively ensuring that humanity is at the core of every product decision. For more info, including demos of Lookback's offering, please visit www.lookback.io.

Peer review lies at the heart of the grant selection process and, by extension, the scientific enterprise itself. To inform their decisions, funders rely on grant reviewers—most of whom volunteer their time—to evaluate numerous proposals. However, despite its massive importance to science and society, peer review itself remains inadequately studied and often poorly understood. To shed light on this critical institution, American Institute of Biological Sciences chief scientist Stephen Gallo and his colleagues recently published the results of a major survey. It is joined by a grant review report from Publons, a company housed within Clarivate Analytics that helps researchers track their research and review outputs and works to encourage greater recognition of scientists' work. In this episode of BioScience Talks, we are joined by Stephen Gallo and Matthew Hayes, director of Publons, who discuss the survey results and shed light on the future of peer review. Read the Publons report. Read the AIBS survey results. Subscribe on iTunes. Subscribe on Stitcher. Catch up with us on Twitter.  

Uma pesquisa elaborada pela consultoria britânica Clarivate Analytics colocou cinco pesquisadores da USP dentre os mais influentes do mundo. André Russowsky Brunoni, professor do Instituto de Psiquiatria da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, é um dos docentes citados no documento, e comentou no Jornal da USP no Ar sobre suas pesquisas nas áreas de depressão e transtornos do humor e neuromodulação não-invasiva no tratamento dos transtornos mentais. Brunoni explicou que a neuromodulação não-invasiva é um tratamento recente que só começou a ser mais difundida fora do meio acadêmico nos últimos cinco anos. A técnica tem duas modalidades: “Uma é a passagem de uma corrente elétrica, mas de uma intensidade muito menor que a eletroconvulsoterapia, e a outra é a indução de um campo eletromagnético com uma estimulação magnética transcraniana (ETC), algo parecido com a ressonância magnética, só que a gente inverte a forma do campo: em vez de usar o campo magnético para fazer o diagnóstico, a gente usa para fazer o tratamento”, esclareceu o professor. A neuromodulação não-invasiva vem obtendo resultados cada vez melhores no tratamento da depressão e de transtornos dolorosos. “Na prática, a gente observa que, para a depressão, a resposta com a estimulação magnética é um pouco mais rápida que os antidepressivos. Os remédios demoram de quatro a seis semanas, e a estimulação magnética começa a dar resultado já na terceira semana de tratamento”, disse Brunoni. Além da resposta mais rápida, a neuromodulação não-invasiva tem efeito comparável aos antidepressivos e a grande vantagem de não ter efeitos colaterais. A técnica também vem sendo estudada no tratamento de outras doenças, como a esquizofrenia, mas ainda está em fase experimental. O professor ainda elencou duas prioridades para o futuro: “Uma é aumentar ainda mais a eficácia, porque a gente imagina que é algo que teria um potencial de induzir uma resposta maior do que os antidepressivos, então a gente quer desenvolver maneiras de aumentar a eficácia da estimulação. A outra possibilidade seria a personalização, ou seja, tentar identificar pacientes através de biomarcadores, assinaturas neurais ou algoritmos baseados na inteligência artificial para apontar quais os que vão responder melhor à estimulação, porque aí poderíamos dar o tratamento certo para o paciente certo”. Já Renata Bertazzi Levy, também citada entre os pesquisadores mais influentes, do Núcleo de Pesquisas Epidemiológicas em Nutrição e Saúde (NUPENS) da USP, fala que é um absurdo subsidiar refrigerantes, como feito no ano passado. Holdings da produção de alimentos têm grande capacidade financeira, e uma ação de saúde pública na nutrologia “precisa de ação governamental”. Renata defende que o exemplo das políticas antitabagismo deve ser seguido na luta contra o consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados. “Propaganda para público infantil e adolescente, venda em escola, devem ser proibidas”, enumera ao Jornal da USP no Ar. Ela esclarece que a regulação de rotulagem e o aumento de impostos também teriam um impacto positivo na saúde pública. Os cientistas do NUPENS ganharam importância mundial ao reclassificar os alimentos em quatro novos grupos. No primeiro, estão alimentos quase sem processamento como arroz, batata, farinha e carne. Compõem o segundo ingredientes extraídos de produtos básicos, como azeites, óleos, açúcar e sal. Comidas cujo processo industrial podem ser reproduzidos em casa fazem parte do terceiro grupo, como pães, massas e compotas de frutas. Feitos com gorduras hidrogenadas, amidos e açúcares modificados, as bolachas e os salgadinhos de pacote, além de embutidos, estão no quarto grupo e nem sequer poderiam ser chamados de alimentos, de acordo com Renata. Mais informações podem ser consultadas no Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira. Uma nova pesquisa de Epidemiologia em Nutrição está em andamento, conta a nutricionista. O estudo vai acompanhar 200 mil pessoas de todas as regiões do País para identificar características da alimentação brasileira que aumentam ou diminuem o risco de doenças crônicas. No Brasil, 20%, em média, da dieta é composta por alimentos ultraprocessados. Nos EUA, a marca alcança 60%. Interessados em participar da pesquisa devem entrar em contato no site Nutrinet. Não se esqueça, essas e outras entrevistas você acompanha de segunda a sexta, das 7h30 a 9h30, na Rádio USP 93,7 em São Paulo, e 107,9 em Ribeirão Preto e streaming. Você pode baixar o podcast e ouvir a qualquer hora, acessando jornal.usp.br  ou utilizar seu agregador de podcast preferido, no Spotify, iTunes e CastBox. Apresentação e produção: Roxane Ré Edição de Som: Cido Tavares

Společnost Clarivate Analytics zveřejnila žebříček Highly Cited Researchers pro rok 2019. Ten sestává přes šest tisíc vědců. Mezi nimi se umístilo také 14 výzkumníků, kteří jako svou primární nebo sekundární afiliaci udali českou výzkumnou instituci. O tom i o ocenění Česká hlava mluvil na Youradio Talk Aleš Vlk z portálu Vědavýzkum.cz

Processo seletivo aberto até 02/09 para conferência ''Na Prática Empreendedorismo e Inovação''. Informações: napratica.org.br E mais uma notícia: Brasil atinge segunda melhor nota de impacto científico em 30 anos, segundo a organização internacional Clarivate Analytics.

Para longe de pensamentos obscurantistas, é fato que o desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico no Brasil constitui condição essencial para um verdadeiro desenvolvimento socioeconômico e para a implantação de uma sociedade mais justa no País. A nossa produção científica praticamente dobrou do começo para o fim da primeira década do século XXI e continuou sua ascensão consistente. Essa expansão notável, fruto de algumas políticas muito bem estruturadas, foi baseada na capacidade de produzir ciência das universidades públicas brasileiras, como a Universidade de São Paulo (USP) e a Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), duas grandes universidades estaduais paulistas, além de outras universidades federais, como a do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), a de Minas Gerais (UFMG) e a do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Mais de 95% da produção científica do Brasil nas bases internacionais deve-se à capacidade de pesquisa de suas universidades públicas. De acordo com uma pesquisa feita pela Clarivate Analytics, o Brasil, no período de 2011 a 2016, publicou mais de 250.000 artigos na base de dados Web of Science em todas as áreas do conhecimento, correspondendo à décima terceira posição na produção científica global, na qual se apresentam mais de 190 países. No entanto, o contingenciamento das verbas das universidades públicas federais e o corte de bolsas e de financiamentos podem colocar em risco as conquistas científicas brasileiras, além de fazer com que muitos pesquisadores procurem no exterior um porto mais seguro. Para falar sobre a situação atual da ciência no Brasil, o Diálogos na USP recebeu os professores Marco Antonio Zago, ex-presidente do CNPq e ex-reitor da USP e atual presidente da Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp), e Marcos Silveira Buckeridge, diretor do Instituto de Biociências da USP e ex-presidente da Academia de Ciências do Estado de São Paulo. Marco Antonio Zago destacou que a ciência brasileira se fortaleceu muito nas duas últimas décadas, adquirindo reconhecimento mundial. Ainda assim, ele disse acreditar que “existe uma divisão muito nítida entre o potencial do país como um todo e do estado de São Paulo, que tem um vigor obviamente muito mais evidente”. Marcos Silveira Buckeridge salientou que não há mais uma distinção entre laboratórios brasileiros e estrangeiros, além de ressaltar áreas nas quais a ciência brasileira vêm despontando, como a agricultura e a engenharia. “Nós temos uma produção científica não só muito boa em si mas que também veio produzindo produtos que realmente fazem uma diferença na sociedade hoje. A ciência não ficou só na produção científica”, afirmou. Zago lembrou o exemplo dado pela Alemanha, que decidiu investir 42 bilhões de euros nas universidades para formar novos pesquisadores. “É um país que tem uma economia muito forte e tem uma longa tradição tanto de educação superior como de pesquisa de qualidade e que sempre pode ser visto como uma referência”, disse o professor. Ele também comentou que “a Alemanha baseia o seu desenvolvimento e o seu sucesso econômico principalmente no conhecimento, na ciência e na tecnologia”. Já o Buckeridge atentou para os professores que “estão com a tocha na mão”. Para ele, estes são pesquisadores que “estão literalmente no escuro. Eles estão discutindo coisas que ninguém se interessa mas que daqui há dez, vinte anos irão se tornar aplicáveis”. O professor também apontou que “é muito barato, em relação ao todo, fazer esse tipo de pesquisa ‘com a tocha na mão'”, e que os projetos seguintes, visando aprofundar os resultados iniciais e buscando aplicações seriam os mais custosos. Acompanhe a íntegra do programa pelos links acima.

This week’s episode is from the Charleston Conference interview series, “Views from the Penthouse Suite”. Courtney McAllister (Electronic Resources Librarian, Lillian Goldman Law Library, Yale University) and Glenda Alvin (Assistant Director of Administrative Collection Management, Tennessee State University) talk with Annette Thomas (CEO, Scientific & Academic Research, Clarivate Analytics) about how libraries are stepping up during this time of technological transformation. They discuss Web of Science and its recent acquisition of Kopernio and Publons. Annette also gives advice to students and recent graduates, and tells us about what she sees as the “lights in the distance” for scholarly information.    

In the first episode of 2019’s Summer season, Leah welcomes our new host, Carol Apollo-Kennedy, Social Media Manager of The Charleston Conference and Against the Grain. We open with a quick introduction of Carol followed by the opening keynote of 2018’s Charleston Conference, presented by Annette Thomas, the Chief Executive Officer of the Scientific & Academic Research business of Clarivate Analytics.   We live in the age of the web. For information professionals in particular, this has been the defining fact of the last 25 years. It has enabled ever greater quantities of research to be published, expanded the range of media we can use, and offered new possibilities for recognizing and rewarding research contributions. But such opportunities also bring challenges and pitfalls. If we do the right things, this could be a golden age for research, but to make the most of it we must embrace the original principles that made the web itself such a powerful force. 

Nas últimas semanas, o Ministério da Educação anunciou o bloqueio de 30% das verbas discricionárias das universidades federais do Brasil. Na prática, a medida reduz 7,4 bilhões de reais do orçamento de custeio que já havia sido aprovado por meio da Lei Orçamentária Anual (a LOA) de 2019 e compromete o funcionamento de atividades de ensino, pesquisa e extensão nas universidades. No caso da pesquisa, a parte mais atingida foi a pós-graduação, com o recolhimento de bolsas consideradas ociosas pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior, a CAPES. O problema é que a CAPES não especificou os critérios utilizados para considerar as bolsas ociosas e muitas delas já estavam destinadas a novos alunos de mestrado e doutorado aprovados nos processos seletivos dos programas de pós-graduação. A medida representa mais um dos ataques que vêm sendo feitos às universidades públicas, com mentiras e muita desinformação. Em entrevista à rádio Jovem Pan no dia 08 de abril, o presidente do país afirmou que “poucas universidades têm pesquisa e, dessas poucas, a grande parte está na iniciativa privada”, quando na verdade, é o contrário. Segundo o relatório feito em 2017 pela empresa Clarivate Analytics, sob solicitação da CAPES, de 2011 a 2016, 95% da produção científica do Brasil, reconhecida internacionalmente, foi feita nas universidades públicas. Aparentemente, o presidente não sabe muito sobre como a pesquisa é feita no Brasil. E na verdade muita gente não sabe. E para mostrar um pouco sobre como é a rotina das milhares de pessoas que produzem ciência no país, dedicamos o episódio de hoje à Vida de Laboratório. E como o assunto é extenso, esse episódio foi dividido em duas partes. Os entrevistados da parte 1 foram o Gustavo Burín, pós-doutorando no Laboratório de Macroevolução e Macroecologia do Instituto de Biociências da USP, o LabMeMe; e os professores Alexandre Falcão e Jancarlo Gomes, do Laboratório de Ciência de Dados de Imagens, chamado de LIDS, da Unicamp. Os três contam histórias interessantes relacionadas às suas áreas de pesquisa e de seus laboratórios. O episódio Vida de Laboratório foi apresentado por Bruno Moraes e Paula Penedo. As entrevistas e produção do roteiro foram feitos por Luanne Caires e Camila Cunha, com ajuda do Allison Almeida, sob coordenação da professora Simone Pallone, do Labjor. Nos trabalhos técnicos, Octávio Augusto, da Rádio Unicamp, e Gustavo Campos. Deixe seu comentário contando o que achou do episódio. Você pode mandar sugestões também pelo Twitter (@oxigenio_news), Instagram (@oxigeniopodcast) e Facebook (/oxigenionoticias). Se preferir, mande um e-mail para oxigenionoticias@gmail.com. Músicas: RobinHood 76 https://freesound.org/people/Robinhood76/sounds/62282/ Future Proof Like a Polaroid Imagem Jarmoluk/Pixabay  

Nas últimas semanas, o Ministério da Educação anunciou o bloqueio de 30% das verbas discricionárias das universidades federais do Brasil. Na prática, a medida reduz 7,4 bilhões de reais do orçamento de custeio que já havia sido aprovado por meio da Lei Orçamentária Anual (a LOA) de 2019 e compromete o funcionamento de atividades de ensino, pesquisa e extensão nas universidades. No caso da pesquisa, a parte mais atingida foi a pós-graduação, com o recolhimento de bolsas consideradas ociosas pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior, a CAPES. O problema é que a CAPES não especificou os critérios utilizados para considerar as bolsas ociosas e muitas delas já estavam destinadas a novos alunos de mestrado e doutorado aprovados nos processos seletivos dos programas de pós-graduação. A medida representa mais um dos ataques que vêm sendo feitos às universidades públicas, com mentiras e muita desinformação. Em entrevista à rádio Jovem Pan no dia 08 de abril, o presidente do país afirmou que “poucas universidades têm pesquisa e, dessas poucas, a grande parte está na iniciativa privada”, quando na verdade, é o contrário. Segundo o relatório feito em 2017 pela empresa Clarivate Analytics, sob solicitação da CAPES, de 2011 a 2016, 95% da produção científica do Brasil, reconhecida internacionalmente, foi feita nas universidades públicas. Aparentemente, o presidente não sabe muito sobre como a pesquisa é feita no Brasil. E na verdade muita gente não sabe. E para mostrar um pouco sobre como é a rotina das milhares de pessoas que produzem ciência no país, dedicamos o episódio de hoje à Vida de Laboratório. E como o assunto é extenso, esse episódio foi dividido em duas partes. Os entrevistados da parte 1 foram o Gustavo Burín, pós-doutorando no Laboratório de Macroevolução e Macroecologia do Instituto de Biociências da USP, o LabMeMe; e os professores Alexandre Falcão e Jancarlo Gomes, do Laboratório de Ciência de Dados de Imagens, chamado de LIDS, da Unicamp. Os três contam histórias interessantes relacionadas às suas áreas de pesquisa e de seus laboratórios. O episódio Vida de Laboratório foi apresentado por Bruno Moraes e Paula Penedo. As entrevistas e produção do roteiro foram feitos por Luanne Caires e Camila Cunha, com ajuda do Allison Almeida, sob coordenação da professora Simone Pallone, do Labjor. Nos trabalhos técnicos, Octávio Augusto, da Rádio Unicamp, e Gustavo Campos. Deixe seu comentário contando o que achou do episódio. Você pode mandar sugestões também pelo Twitter (@oxigenio_news), Instagram (@oxigeniopodcast) e Facebook (/oxigenionoticias). Se preferir, mande um e-mail para oxigenionoticias@gmail.com. Músicas: RobinHood 76 https://freesound.org/people/Robinhood76/sounds/62282/ Future Proof Like a Polaroid Imagem Jarmoluk/Pixabay  

Dr. Peter DeCarlo is an Associate Professor with appointment in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, and the Department of Chemistry at Drexel University. He is also an affiliate of the Urban Health Collaborative in the School of Public Health at Drexel University and an adjunct member of the Center for Excellence in Environmental Toxicology (CEET) at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. DeCarlo has a Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science from the University of Colorado, and a BS in Biochemistry from the University of Notre Dame. He uses state-of-the-art instrumentation to measure the chemical composition of particulates and gases in indoors, outdoors, and in the laboratory to better understand the intersection between air quality, health, and climate impacts of human emissions. He has made air quality and climate related measurements from planes, trucks, and stationary sites all over the world to better understand direct emissions, sources, and subsequent chemical reactions of pollutants in the atmosphere. More recently Dr. DeCarlo has begun measuring the relationship between outdoor and indoor air pollutants, to understand transport of outdoor pollutants to the indoor environment, and to identify indoor specific sources such as residual tobacco smoke, and direct human emissions. He also is interested in the intersection of science and policy and was an AAAS Science Policy Fellow at the US EPA working on issues related to clean cookstoves in the developing world and public sharing of environmental data prior to starting his faculty position at Drexel. Funding for his research comes from the National Science Foundation, Sloan Foundation, Electric Power Research Institute, Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation, and the Department of Transportation. Dr. DeCarlo has co-authored over 80 peer reviewed publication and has been identified as a highly cited researcher by Clarivate Analytics (2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017).

Dr. Peter DeCarlo is an Associate Professor with appointment in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, and the Department of Chemistry at Drexel University.  He is also an affiliate of the Urban Health Collaborative in the School of Public Health at Drexel University and an adjunct member of the Center for Excellence in Environmental Toxicology (CEET) at the University of Pennsylvania.  Dr. DeCarlo has a Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science from the University of Colorado, and a BS in Biochemistry from the University of Notre Dame. He uses state-of-the-art instrumentation to measure the chemical composition of particulates and gases in indoors, outdoors, and in the laboratory to better understand the intersection between air quality, health, and climate impacts of human emissions.  He has made air quality and climate related measurements from planes, trucks, and stationary sites all over the world to better understand direct emissions, sources, and subsequent chemical reactions of pollutants in the atmosphere. More recently Dr. DeCarlo has begun measuring the relationship between outdoor and indoor air pollutants, to understand transport of outdoor pollutants to the indoor environment, and to identify indoor specific sources such as residual tobacco smoke, and direct human emissions. He also is interested in the intersection of science and policy and was an AAAS Science Policy Fellow at the US EPA working on issues related to clean cookstoves in the developing world and public sharing of environmental data prior to starting his faculty position at Drexel.  Funding for his research comes from the National Science Foundation, Sloan Foundation, Electric Power Research Institute, Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation, and the Department of Transportation. Dr. DeCarlo has co-authored over 80 peer reviewed publication and has been identified as a highly cited researcher by Clarivate Analytics (2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017).

What is the Journal Impact Factor? The Journal Impact Factor is widely used as a tool to evaluate studies, and researchers. It supposedly measures the quality of a journal by scoring how many citations an average article in this journal achieves. Committees making hiring and funding decisions use the 'JIF' as an approximation for the quality of the work a researcher has published, and in extension as an approximation for the capabilities of an applicant. Listen to the Full Conversation on Patreon! JIF as a measure of researcher merit I find this practice already highly questionable. First of all, it appears the formula calculates a statistical mean. However, no article can receive less than 0 citations, while there is no upper limit to citations. Most articles - across all journal - receive only very few citations, and only a few may receive a lot of citations. This means we have a 'skewed distribution' when we plot how many papers received how many citations. The statistical mean, however, is not applicable for skewed distributions. Moreover, basic statistics and probability tell us that if you blindly choose one paper from a journal, it is impossible to predict -or even roughly estimate - its quality by the average citation rate, alone. It is further impossible to know the author's actual contribution to said paper. Thus, we are already stacking three statistical fallacies by applying JIF to evaluate researchers. But this is just the beginning! Journals don't have an interest in the Journal Impact Factor as a tool for science evaluation. Their interest is in the advertising effect of the JIF. As we learn from our guest, Dr. Björn Brembs (professor for neurogenetics at University of Regensburg), journals negotiate with the private company Clarivate Analytics (in the past it was Reuters) that provides the numbers. Especially larger publishers have a lot of room to influence the numbers above and below the division line in their favor. Reputation is not quality. There is one thing the Journal Impact Factor can tell us: how good the reputation of the journal is among researchers. But does that really mean anything substantial? Björn Brembs reviewed a large body of studies that compared different measures of scientific rigor with the impact factor of journals. He finds that in most research fields the impact factor doesn't tell you anything about the quality of the work. In some fields it may even be a predictor of unreliable science! This reflects the tendency of high ranking journals to prefer novelty over quality. How does this affect science and academia? The JIF is omnipresent. A CV (the academic resume) is not only judged by the name of the journals in a publication list. Another factor is the funding a researcher has been able to get. However, funding committees may also use JIF to evaluate whether an applicant is worthy of funding. Another point on a CV is the reputation of the advisers, who were also evaluated by their publications and funding. Another important point on a CV is the reputation of the institute one worked at, which is to some degree evaluated by the publications and the funding of their principle investigators. It is easy to see how this puts a lot of power into the hands of the editors of high ranking journals. Björn Brembs is concerned about the probable effect this has on the quality of science overall. If the ability to woe editors and write persuasive stories leads to more success than rigorous science, researchers will behave accordingly. And they will also teach their students to put even more emphasis on their editor persuasion skills. Of course not all committees use JIF to determine who gets an interview. But still the best strategy for early career researchers is to put all their efforts into pushing their work into high ranking journals. What now?! We also talk about possible solutions to the problem.

Welcome to episode 42 of ATG: The Podcast. For readers of Against the Grain, our guest this week will be familiar from her long-time contributions to the “Copyright Questions and Answers” column. Laura N. “Lolly” Gasaway is the Paul B. Eaton Distinguished Professor of Law Emerita of UNC Chapel Hill. This week, she’s reading her column from the February 2016 issue of Against the Grain, v28 #1. As always, Lolly answers many intriguing questions. Included are questions sent in from an academic librarian, a public librarian, an elementary school teacher and more. But first, a few announcements. When this podcast is aired on Monday, November 6, it will be the start of the Charleston Conference week! We’re looking forward to seeing all of our attendees, presenters, sponsors, and exhibitors there. Please check in upon arrival to receive your name badge and attendee materials. Name badges will be required for entry into conference venues, the reception, and conference shuttles. The registration check-in desk will be located in the upper lobby of the Francis Marion Hotel at 387 King Street. Hours are posted on the conference website at the link provided in the show notes. The 2017 Conference Reception, sponsored by Elsevier, will be held on Wednesday, November 8, from 7:00 – 9:00 pm at the SC Aquarium. Shuttle transportation will be available from the Francis Marion Hotel to the aquarium. The entire aquarium, plus the Shark Shallows touch tank outside on the deck, will be open for attendees to visit. Delicious Lowcountry specialties, like shrimp and grits, as well as more traditional reception fare will be served and beer, wine and soft drinks will be available at the bar. Live musical entertainment will be provided by The Soulfeathers. Side note – the awesome guy on drums is my brother! We’ll also have a photo booth, sponsored by Duke University Press, to take pictures with fun and goofy props. Conducting a Conference takes a lot of dedication, time, and assistance from a lot of people. It also takes money. The Charleston Conference would like to thank all of our sponsors that made generous contributions: Adam Matthew, American Mathematical Society, Better World Books, Cambridge University Press, Canadian Science Publishing, CHOICE, Clarivate Analytics, Credo Reference, Duke University Press, EBSCO Information Services, Elsevier, Gale, a Cengage Company, HighWire Press, IGI Global, IOP Publishing, MDPI, the OECD, Oxford University Press, ProQuest, Rittenhouse, SAGE Publishing, Springer Nature, the Society for Scholarly Publishing, Taylor & Francis Group, University of Hawaii Press, the Wall Street Journal, and Yewno. Please thank their representatives when you see them! --------------------------- And now, a few updates to the “If Rumors Were Horses” column from Katina Strauch. I hope that you have all heard that Leah Hinds has been appointed Executive Director of the Charleston Conference! Leah is tireless and deserves all the recognition we can give her! Look at all the new initiatives that have begun with ATG and ATG media! Speaking of which there was a free webinar on Wednesday -- Charleston Library Conference Tips and Tricks for Attending. Heather Staines and Leah organized it and many of the Charleston Conference regulars will be on the webinar. Here is a link to it for your use! It will be available on the Conference website as of Thursday November 2. https://www.charlestonlibraryconference.com/video/webinars See the Charleston Conference November print issue (v.29#5, p.85) of ATG for a picture of the awesome (we used to call him “the nemesis” in earlier ATGs) Chuck Hamaker who has retired from UNC-Charlotte. Chuck is pictured with his Emeritus certificate from UNC-C. What a career Chuck has had. He will be presenting at the Charlotte Initiative Symposium on Monday afternoon. 2017charlestonconference.sched.org/ If you haven’t encountered Carol Apollo you need to! Carol and Leah met when they were neighbors in Gilbert, SC. Carol is a Social Media Manager and Strategist who believes that a good social media campaign has the power to change the world. She has worked mostly with non-profit and volunteer organizations to optimize their Internet presence and engage their audience and has been working with Against the Grain Media for the past 6 months. Carol’s podcast on social media for libraries is available on the ATG newschannel. Carol has moved back up north but she will be in Charleston helping with the podcast at the Conference in the Gaillard Center lobby - recording takeaways and comments from attendees. She will also be helping with the Speed networking during the poster sessions at the Conference http://atgthepodcast.libsyn.com/podcast/atgthepodcast-039-libraries-and-social-media-with-carol-apollo Speaking of the Poster sessions, Tom Gilson has worked diligently with Jesse Lamarre of Morressier Gmbh in Berlin. Thank also to Sven Fund for hooking us up with Morressier and to John Williams who has worked with Tom and Jesse to make the virtual posters a reality. Hope that you all like them! There will be 37 Virtual posters in Charleston this year! jesse.lamarre@morressier.com www.morressier.com Fast Pitch finalists have been selected and we're in the process of coaching. Be sure to come and vote for our favorite at the session on Wed 11/8 at 4:40 PM.  Glenda Alvin is introducing Loretta Parham, one of our keynote speakers at the Conference. Glanda was reminiscing about African American Librarians attending the Conference. Many of them have retired and we are searching for more to take up the mantle! Be sure and meet Aaisha Haykal, manager of archives at the Avery Center for Research in African American History, who is attending this year! We told you in the print November ATG that Franny Lee is now VP of Product Development at Chegg, a publicly-traded company with a learning platform and product lines that include textbook rental, tutoring services, test pre, etc. Tom Gilson had a Penthouse Interview scheduled with Franny during the Charleston Conference but we have just learned that Franny is not able to come to Charleston because of a medical procedure. www.chegg.com/ I was poking around the ATG newschannel and learned that Napoleon was a bibliophile! He traveled with a library of miniature books and was a voracious reader. This was John Riley’s ATG Quirky ATG Quirkies: Napoleon’s Kindle on October 25. I seem to remember that Elisabeth Chapman was a collector of miniature books. Liz is retired but I’ll bet she is still collecting miniature books! Returning to John Riley! He will NOT be in Charleston this year because he is running for political office! Mayor of Northampton! That's the good news. The bad news is that he will have to miss his first Charleston Conference in 32 years! With the election being held on November 7 he just can't break away on time. Speaking of the 37th Charleston Conference! I am looking forward to it! I am not the spring chicken that I once was so I am having trouble getting around! BUT I WANT very much to meet all of you so please come up and interrupt me and let’s talk! Thanks and much love always, Katina Yr Ed.  

Neste quinquagésimo e comemorativo episódio, Paulo Sant’anna recebe novamente Carlos Botelho, Gerente Técnico de Contas da MarkMonitor, para uma conversa bastante interessante a respeito dos Serviços de Proteção de marcas. Carlos explicou que o Serviço de Proteção de marcas foi criado pela própria MarkMonitor no ano 2000, tornando-se líder mundial no que tange ao monitoramento do uso de marca de terceiros na Internet. O serviço atua na identificação de infrações e situações com determinada marca de uma empresa sendo utilizada indevidamente por outros como, por exemplo, em registro de domínios, logotipos utilizados no conteúdo de sites, páginas e anúncios falsos. entre outros exemplos. Durante o podcast, Carlos apresentou cada módulo que compõe o Serviço de proteção de marcas. São eles: Módulo Websites - Módulo criado para a monitoração do uso da marca em registro de domínios, em conteúdo de sites e logotipos sendo utilizados indevidamente. Módulo MarketPlace - Responsável por realizar a monitoração de 98% dos sites de comércio eletrônico com mais tráfego no mundo e identificar anúncios de vendas de produtos falsificados e indevidos. Módulo Social Media - Realiza o monitoramento das redes sociais como blogs, fóruns de discussão e as principais redes sociais do mundo no intuito de identificar páginas falsas e que estejam utilizando as marcas de forma indevida. Módulo Paid Search - Módulo desenvolvido para monitoração de anúncios pagos nos buscadores que utilizam marcas de forma indevida e redirecionam tráfego para páginas falsas ou para um site competidor, por exemplo. Módulo Mobile Apps - Realiza a monitoração as lojas de aplicações móveis para celulares e tablets em busca de apps que estejam utilizando indevidamente a marca ou que sejam falsas. Ao final, Carlos explicou a respeito da implementação da solução, que é baseada em Software como Serviço (SaaS), não sendo necessária qualquer instalação no ambiente do cliente. A Clavis Segurança da Informação é parceira oficial da MarkMonitor e a principal representante no Brasil. Para saber mais sobre o serviço de proteção de marcas oferecido pela Clavis, clique aqui. Carlos Botelho é Gerente Técnico de Contas da MarkMonitor, Inc., parte da Clarivate Analytics, baseado em Boise, estado de Idaho, nos Estados Unidos. Pelos últimos 7 anos, ele vem trabalhando na área de proteção de marcas, antifraude e gestão de domínios, além de já ter atuado como Analista de Proteção de Marcas, Gerente de Serviços de Anti-Fraude e Gerente de Serviços de Domínios. Carlos também é advogado desde o ano 2000 e possui mestrado em Direito (LL.M) obtido na Faculdade de Direito J. Reuben Clark da Brigham Young University, em Provo, estado de Utah, no Estados Unidos.

Welcome to episode 36 of ATG: The Podcast.  We have a short episode this week, but still packed with lots of good stuff. First off, do you know a rising star in the library and information world?  Would you like to see them recognized for their promising achievements?  Look no further!  ATG Media is thrilled to announce the first ever round of nominations for Up and Comers.  Who exactly is an “Up and Comer”, you ask?  They are librarians, library staff, vendors, publishers, MLIS students, instructors, consultants, and researchers who are new to their field or are in the early years of the profession.  An Up and Comer can be someone you work with, someone you’ve presented with or shaken hands with at a conference, or someone whose accomplishments and potential you admire.  Up and Comers are passionate about the future of libraries.  They innovate, inspire, collaborate, and take risks.  They are future library leaders and change makers.  And they all have one thing in common: they deserve to be celebrated.  The 2017 Up and Comers will be recognized in the December/January issue of Against the Grain, and 20 of these brilliant rising stars will be profiled in the same issue.  In addition, they will be featured in a series of scheduled podcast interviews that will be posted on the ATGthePodcast.com website. Nominations for the inaugural round of Up and Comers is open through September 1.  Don’t wait!   Spread the good news, tell your friends and colleagues, and nominate your favorite Up and Comer at the link provided below. https://www.charlestonlibraryconference.com/up-comer-nominations-now-open/ There are several scholarships available for this year’s Charleston Conference. Springer Nature is proud to honor the legacy of Cynthia Graham Hurd by awarding a $1,500 travel grant to a librarian that has not had an opportunity to attend the Charleston Library Conference due to lack of institutional funding. To apply, librarians are asked to submit a project or initiative developed at their library to enhance diversity and inclusion. Topics can include diversity in selection of resources, providing services to support the research and learning needs of all segments of the academic community, improving educational outcomes, addressing issues including racial disparities, racial equity, income inequality, gender inequality and more. The application deadline is October 2. EBSCO is providing a scholarship of up to $1,000 for applicants who currently work as a librarian or para-professional. You can apply by sending one professional recommendation,, your CV, and a short essay on the following topic: A 2015 article in Entrepreneur declared that the One Certainty about the Future is the Pace of Change will Only Quicken. To be prepared for what the future holds, what are the top three juggernauts that librarians need to address to position libraries to succeed and to expand their position within their institutions? The application deadline has been extended to September 15. In an ongoing effort to help librarians grow professionally and increase their understanding of the changing state of knowledge resources, IGI Global is proud to continue the Academic Librarian Sponsorship Program, which sponsors librarians’ attendance of the industry’s most important events. 2017 application information will be posted the first week of September. We’d like to congratulate the scholarship winners who’ve already been announced for this year: Christian Burris from Smith Reynolds Library, Wake Forest University, won the Harrasowitz Charleston Conference Scholarship, and Molly J. Mulligan, an Electronic Resources Acquisitions Professional at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs (UCCS) Kraemer Family Library is the grand prize winner for the SAGE Publishing photo contest. Links to Christian’s winning essay and Molly’s winning photo are available on the Conference website at the link below. https://www.charlestonlibraryconference.com/scholarships/ Taylor & Francis have put together a great series of videos titled “Why Charleston?” showing clips of attendees from the 2016 conference that have been added to our YouTube channel. There are some shorter clips, each around a certain theme of the conference, and one full length video showing all of them together. Thank you to the team at Taylor & Francis for creating and sharing them with us. https://www.youtube.com/user/CharlestonConference/ A reminder that the Charleston Fast Pitch is still accepting proposals that pitch a winning idea to improve service at an academic or research library through September 15.  The proposal should describe a project or venture that is innovative, useful and better or different than what has been done in the past or done currently. Selected proposers will have five minutes to pitch their idea before a Charleston Conference audience on Wednesday, November 8, and a panel of judges who will determine the finalists. The Goodall Family Charitable Foundation will sponsor two $2,500 awards for the finalists.    Last year's winners were Syracuse University for their Blackstone LaunchPad for student entrepreneurship, and St. John Fisher College, for their Coordinated Collection Development API Project. A write up of the session is available on the conference blog, and an ATG Special Report on all the winners, runners up, and honorable mentions is available on the Against the Grain website. https://www.charlestonlibraryconference.com/fastpitch/ http://www.against-the-grain.com/2016/11/charleston-fast-pitch-competition/ http://www.against-the-grain.com/2017/01/atg-special-report-the-charleston-library-conference-fast-pitch-2016/ The program is coming together nicely, and we should have something to share with you in the next few weeks. Confirmed plenary speakers include Loretta Parham, CEO and Director of the Atlanta University Center (AUC) Robert W. Woodruff Library, Georgios Papadopoulos, Founder and CEO of Atypon, Jim O’Donnell of Arizona State University, and  Brewster Kahle, Founder and Digital Librarian of the Internet Archive. We’re also excited to welcome back the “Long Arm of the Law” panel, organized and moderated by Ann Okerson, Senior Advisor to CRL. This year’s talk includes Charleston favorite William Hannay, Partner at Schiff Hardin LLP, and Ruth L. Okediji, Jeremiah Smith, Jr. Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. https://www.charlestonlibraryconference.com/speakers/ Now, Katina has some additions to her “If Rumors Were Horses” column in ATG. Thanks Katina! Hello everyone! The ATG and Charleston Conference teams are all fine in Charleston. We have heard from several of you after the shooting at Virginia’s Restaurant on King Street on Thursday, August 24. Thanks for everyone’s concern.  The hard-working and focused Rolf Janke has recently moved to Raleigh, NC and he says it’s great to be back East again! Rolf has already had lunch with Beth Bernhardt in Greensboro. He is planning to drive to Charleston this November for the Conference. Rolf is founder and publisher of Mission Bell Media which publishes print and digital media for the library market with a focus on leadership.Titles from thePeak Series represent contemporary topics for academic librarian career development. http://www.missionbellmedia.com/ While we are talking about books, did you see the article in the Wall Street Journal about Sue Grafton (August 25, p. M3). Sue’s father was a novelist  himself. Both parents were alcoholics though apparently her father was a successful lawyer and wrote detective fiction at night. Her mother was  “vivacious, outgoing, pretty and friendly” when she was sober. Sue talks about being afraid of water in the basement of their huge house because of big rains and sitting at home with a butcher knife because she was afraid of “bad guys”. The stuff of fiction. Fascinating and wonderful article. Highly recommended. https://www.wsj.com/articles/author-sue-graftons-scary-childhood-home-1503413068 While we are talking about books, we have been spending a lot of time in our new place on Sullivan’s Island and my son Raymond, the real bookman, discovered sullivans-trade-a-book-mount-pleasant. It’s a delightful bookstore with wonderful inventory (we bought many new additions for our personal libraries). Between the Edgar Allan Poe Branch of the Charleston County Library on Sullivan’s and Trade a Book in Mt.Pleasant, I think we will have plenty to keep us reading! An aside, Poe was stationed on Sullivan’s as a private in the US Army in 1827 and 1828  and he used the island setting as the background of his story “The Gold Bug.” http://www.ccpl.org/content.asp?id=14637&action=detail& https://www.yelp.com/biz/sullivans-trade-a-book-mount-pleasant Was excited to learn that the great debater Alison Scott has been appointed associate university librarian for collection management and scholarly communication by the UCLA Library. She will assume her role on Oct. 2. “I am pleased to welcome Alison to the UCLA Library,” said Ginny Steel, Norman and Armena Powell University Librarian. “Her extensive, varied experience with collection development, licensing, budgetary constraints and statewide and national consortial initiatives will enable us to continue to build, preserve, and provide access to a rich, deep collection of physical and digital materials that support UCLA's fundamental mission of teaching, research and public service.” The associate university librarian has leadership, management, strategic policy and planning responsibilities for collection management functions and the library’s comprehensive scholarly communication program. The position oversees five major departments: cataloging and metadata, preservation, print acquisitions, scholarly communication and licensing and the Southern Regional Library Facility.  Alison comes to UCLA from UC Riverside, where she has been associate university librarian for collections and scholarly communication since 2014. While there she has focused in particular on enhancing the library’s approach to collection development, crafting a curation strategy that views general and special collections materials as combined into distinctive collecting areas and incorporating faculty involvement into the review process. Prior to working at Riverside, Alison served as head of collection development at George Washington University and in a number of collection development roles at Harvard University’s Widener Library. She earned her doctorate in American and New England studies at Boston University, master’s degrees in library science and in religion from theUniversity of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in English literature from Whitman College. I remember the Hyde Park Debate at the 2016 Charleston Conference  between Alison Scott and Michael Levine-Clark  on the topicResolved: APC-Funded Open Access is Antithetical to the Values of Librarianship In Favor: Alison Scott and Opposed: Michael Levine-Clark. The debate was conducted in general accordance with Oxford Union rules. All in the audience voted their opinion on the resolution before the debate began using text message voting, and the vote totals were recorded. Each speaker offered a formal opening statement, followed by a response to each other's statements, and then the floor was open for  discussion. At the conclusion of the debate, another vote was taken. The winner of the debate was the one who caused the most audience members to change their votes. Members of the audience had an opportunity to make comments and pose questions as well. I remember voting for Alison because I thought she did a great debating job! No hard feelings please, Michael! Plus, I think I was once again against the grain of the group. www.against-the-grain.com www.charlestonlibraryconference.com Moving right along, we decided to take the debate online as a Webinar this year and we had a huge registration (363) on the debate topic of Resolved: The Journal Impact Factor does more harm than good. Debating were Ann Beynon (Clarivate Analytics) and Sara Rouhi(Altmetric).  I have to give big kudos to Rick Anderson. The debates are his creation. Rick acts as the moderator for each debate.  We are planning for more debates this year. Please send suggestions of possible resolutions! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=567UeNLKJx8 Several months ago, Tom Gilson and I were able to interview Andrea Michalek, Managing Director of Plum Analytics, to discuss its acquisition by Elsevier. Recently  we learned that Elsevier is integrating PlumX Metrics into its leading products, expanding access to these tools to the wider academic community. We are updating the interview even as we speak. Watch for it on the ATG NewsChannel and in the print issues of ATG. Speaking of which, shocking us all, Elsevier has just acquired another US-based business, bepress. WOW! Here is some of the press release. -- Elsevier, today acquired bepress, a Berkeley, California-based business that helps academic libraries showcase and share their institutions’ research for maximum impact. Founded by three University of California, Berkeley professors in 1999, bepress allows institutions to collect, organize, preserve and disseminate their intellectual output, including pre-prints, working papers, journals or specific articles, dissertations, theses, conference proceedings and a wide variety of other data. “Academic institutions want to help researchers share their work, showcase their capabilities and measure how well they’re performing,” said Jean-Gabriel Bankier, bepress CEO. “Now with Elsevier we’ll be stronger and better by applying more technologies and data and analytics capabilities to help more institutions achieve their research goals.”  The bepress model is unlimited, cloud-based, and fully hosted, and includes dedicated consulting and support. bepress offers Digital Commons, the leading hosted institutional repository software platform and a comprehensive showcase for everything produced on campus. It is also the only repository that seamlessly integrates with the Expert Gallery Suite, a solution for highlighting faculty and research expertise. The bepress CEO and employees will continue working with the company in Berkeley, California. The acquisition is effective immediately and terms of the agreement are not being disclosed. That’s it for this week! If you have comments or questions, you can click the “Contact” button on the podcast website, or you can email me directly at leah@charlestonlibraryconference.com. Thanks for listening, and I hope to hear from you soon!  

In this episode Andy Davis talks to Jayakanthan M, global head of talent and culture at Clarivate Analytics, about working with teams to get the most out of their people. They discuss his unusual move into the world of HR, learning as your role changes and the characteristics needed to work in HR,

Neste episódio, Paulo Sant'anna recebe Carlos Botelho, Gerente Técnico de Contas da MarkMonitor para uma conversa a respeito das Soluções de Anti-fraude e proteção de marca para grandes empresas. Inicialmente Carlos explicou a respeito de fraudes, as principais ações que podem caracterizar uma e os tipos mais comuns. As industrias financeiras, comércio e prestação de serviços foram citadas como alvos constantes das tentativas de fraudes e o Phishing, técnica utilizada por cibercriminosos para tentar obter dados e informações por meio de e-mails e páginas falsas utilizando marcas famosas, o meio mais utilizado atualmente. Durante o podcast, Carlos apresentou a solução da MarkMonitor de anti-fraude, que faz a detecção de ataques de Phishing e Malware e de proteção de marca, que oferece acompanhamento de vários ambientes na internet, tendo uma abrangência multicanal, monitorando o uso da marca por terceiros não somente na gestão do registro de domínios bem como em anúncios pagos em motores de busca e nas redes sociais. A Clavis Segurança da Informação é parceira oficial da Markmonitor e a principal representante no Brasil. Carlos Botelho é Gerente Técnico de Contas da MarkMonitor, Inc., parte da Clarivate Analytics, baseado em Boise, estado de Idaho, nos Estados Unidos. Pelos últimos 7 anos, ele vem trabalhando na área de proteção de marcas, anti-fraude e gestão de domínios e já atuou como Analista de Proteção de Marcas, Gerente de Serviços de Anti-Fraude e Gerente de Serviços de Domínios. Carlos também é advogado desde o ano 2000 e possui mestrado em Direito (LL.M) obtido na Faculdade de Direito J. Reuben Clark da Brigham Young University, em Provo, estado de Utah, no Estados Unidos.

Abhishek Kohli — Sales In India It’s not just about selling to one person. Full show notes complete with shareable clips and links to items mentioned in the show available at: http://top1.fm/23 This episode was sponsored by ViewedIt by Vidyard. Get the free chrome extension today: http://top1.fm/v Abhishek Kohli is an Account Manager at Clarivate Analytics, which was until recently, the Intellectual Property and Science business of Thomson Reuters. He is based in New Delhi, India, where he is selling to government agencies and institutions in the North and Central part of India. In this episode, he shares his experiences dealing with government bodies and bureaucracies in one of the toughest, most challenging markets, India, and how he overcomes the obstacles he is faced with on a daily basis. Tune in to find out more!