Podcasts about riam

durée : 00:05:41 - L'invité de 6h20 - Aïcha Boukir, coordinatrice du Riam, le réseau interassociatif de Mayotte, était l'invitée de France Inter ce lundi, avant la visite d'Emmanuel Macron dans l'archipel.

En este nuevo programa de La aventura de viajar hablaremos de lugares poco habituales, sitios que tal vez nos producen miedo o inquietud, pero a la vez nos llaman poderosamente la atención. Cementerios, cárceles, lugares con energías especiales, sitios donde sucedió alguna catástrofe o asesinato macabro, lugares abandonados… visitar estos lugares se ha venido a llamar turismo dark, algo así como turismo oscuro o tenebroso. Míriam del Río, una periodista especializada en temas culturales e históricos, nos hablará de ellos y de las motivaciones para visitarlos. Es autora de dos libros sobre el tema publicados por Luciérnaga titulados, Turismo Dark y Turismo Dark 2 y más recientemente La otra cara de la historia. Más información: Hemos preparado una entrada sobre este programa con todos los nombres, enlaces, fotos e información adicional en: https://www.iatiseguros.com/blog/category/eventos-iati/podcast-iati/ Recuerda que viajes donde viajes es importante hacerlo con un buen seguro que te cubra los mil y un problemas que pueden surgir en cualquier viaje. Y que hay viajes solo, en pareja o en familia, hay un seguro adecuado para cada viaje. Por ejemplo, para destinos aventureros solemos recomendar el IATI Mochilero (https://www.iatiseguros.com/seguros-viaje/21841/seguro-de-viaje-mochilero/), para lugares más caros el IATI Estrella (https://www.iatiseguros.com/seguros-viaje/26829/seguro-viaje-iati-estrella/), por si quieres estar aún más tranquilo con sus enormes gastos médicos cubiertos y los límites más elevados en todas las coberturas. Si quieres conocer el resto de seguros puedes consultarlos en https://www.iatiseguros.com/seguros-viaje/ donde puedes compararlos para encontrar el que mejor se adapte a tu viaje. Para estar al tanto de novedades viajeras puedes consultar nuestro blog https://www.iatiseguros.com/blog/ y buscarnos en todas las redes sociales como @iatiseguros Si te ha gustado el programa, te invitamos a que lo compartas para ayudar a otros viajeros. Para no perderte nuevos programas suscríbete en tu plataforma favorita: Apple Podcast, iVoox, Spotify, Podimo, Amazon Music...

podcast recorded with enacast.com

Afonso Borges apresenta o livro "Lulli, a gata aventureira". A obra de Míriam Leitão é baseada em uma história real. Saiba mais escutando ao episódio!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

O que separa corações não é a distância, é a indiferença. Há pessoas juntas estando separadas por milhares de quilômetros e outras separadas vivendo lado-a-lado. Muitas vezes nos importamos com o que acontece no mundo, nos sensibilizamos e pensamos até em fazer alguma coisa, mas nos esquecemos do que se passa ao nosso lado, na nossa casa, na nossa família e mesmo na vizinhança. Colocamos, sem querer, barreiras entre os corações que nos cercam. A indiferença mata lentamente, anula qualquer sentimento; e assim criamos distâncias quando estamos tão próximos. As pessoas se habituam tanto aquelas que convivem com elas que elas passam a não notá-las mais, a não dar mais importância. Mas, se quisermos transformar o mundo, comecemos por transformar a nós mesmos. Se quisermos entrar em combates para melhorar algo para o futuro, que esse combate comece dentro da nossa própria casa. Precisamos olhar os que estão ao nosso lado sempre com olhos novos. Comunicar mais, destruir mais barreiras e construir mais pontes. Precisamos nos dar de coração a coração. A melhor maneira de acabar com a indiferença de uma pessoa em relação a nós é amá-la. O amor transforma tudo. Não permita que pessoas ao seu lado morram de solidão! Não permita que elas sintam-se melhor fora de casa que dentro dela! Dê atenção, dê do seu próprio tempo! Comunique-se! Assista menos televisão e converse mais. Riam juntos. Há quanto tempo você não diz para a pessoa que vive ao seu lado que gosta dela? A gente não recupera tempo perdido. Mas podemos decidir não perder mais. Vamos amar os corações que nos cercam e tentar alcançar novamente aqueles que se distanciaram. Há sempre tempo para se amar. E se não houvesse, o próprio amor seria capaz de inventar.

O que separa corações não é a distância, é a indiferença. Há pessoas juntas estando separadas por milhares de quilômetros e outras separadas vivendo lado-a-lado. Muitas vezes nos importamos com o que acontece no mundo, nos sensibilizamos e pensamos até em fazer alguma coisa, mas nos esquecemos do que se passa ao nosso lado, na nossa casa, na nossa família e mesmo na vizinhança. Colocamos, sem querer, barreiras entre os corações que nos cercam. A indiferença mata lentamente, anula qualquer sentimento; e assim criamos distâncias quando estamos tão próximos. As pessoas se habituam tanto aquelas que convivem com elas que elas passam a não notá-las mais, a não dar mais importância. Mas, se quisermos transformar o mundo, comecemos por transformar a nós mesmos. Se quisermos entrar em combates para melhorar algo para o futuro, que esse combate comece dentro da nossa própria casa. Precisamos olhar os que estão ao nosso lado sempre com olhos novos. Comunicar mais, destruir mais barreiras e construir mais pontes. Precisamos nos dar de coração a coração. A melhor maneira de acabar com a indiferença de uma pessoa em relação a nós é amá-la. O amor transforma tudo. Não permita que pessoas ao seu lado morram de solidão! Não permita que elas sintam-se melhor fora de casa que dentro dela! Dê atenção, dê do seu próprio tempo! Comunique-se! Assista menos televisão e converse mais. Riam juntos. Há quanto tempo você não diz para a pessoa que vive ao seu lado que gosta dela? A gente não recupera tempo perdido. Mas podemos decidir não perder mais. Vamos amar os corações que nos cercam e tentar alcançar novamente aqueles que se distanciaram. Há sempre tempo para se amar. E se não houvesse, o próprio amor seria capaz de inventar.

Episodio 1310 Damos la bienvenida de nuevo a nuestro podcast a la prolífica Míriam Tirado, asesora de crianza, escritora, podcaster, con su nuevo libro sobre pareja y crianza Criar juntos, publicado por Grijalbo.Web: https://madresfera.com/Newsletter mensual: https://www.madresfera.com/newsletter/ Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/buenos-dias-madresfera--2023835/support.

Hoy tenemos una cita con Míriam Carrera. Esta violinista llegó a Málaga hace algo más de siete años con las ideas muy claras: Montar una Orquesta Sinfónica

La portavoz de Junts en el Congreso, Míriam Nogueras, considera que, después de un año de investidura, el balance no es positivo para los ciudadanos de Cataluña. "Junts está haciendo aquello que no hace el Govern de Catalunya", asegura Nogueras en una entrevista en 'Las Mañanas de RNE'. La portavoz avisa que "no van de farol" y que ellos no están para dar estabilidad a ningún gobierno español, sino para mejorar la vida de los ciudadanos de Cataluña. Sobre los presupuestos generales del Estado, Míriam Nogueras "ve complicado" que se puedan aprobar. Dice que el Gobierno no se ha puesto en contacto con ellos para hablar sobre eso y no cree que "esa carpeta nos llegue encima de la mesa". "Creo que no se van a negociar los presupuestos [...] Hasta que no se pague lo que se debe a los catalanes, no podemos sentarnos a hablar de unos presupuestos nuevos".Escuchar audio

Federico entrevista a la presidenta de España Mejor, Míriam González.

Míriam Rubio, delegada del sindicato de enfermería, nos habla sobre la situación en los servicios de urgencias de la ciudad de Segovia

El Consejo Fiscal exige la dimisión de Álvaro García Ortiz como fiscal general del Estado. En 24 horas de RNE, Míriam Nogueras, portavoz de Junts en el Congreso, ha comentado que está problemática entre el poder judicial y político ha sucedido siempre: "Es historia de la política española, jueces haciendo de políticos y estos haciendo de jueces. Desafortunadamente, el prestigio de la justicia española se la han cargado hace años personas como Marchena". Sobre los Presupuestos Generales del Estado, la portavoz de Junts ha explicado que actualmente no hay una negociación abierta sobre ellos. "Nosotros no nos casamos con nadie. Hemos dejado muy claro que no formamos parte de ningún bloque (…) firmamos un acuerdo con el Partido Socialista, pero no firmamos un acuerdo de estabilidad, por lo tanto, nosotros vamos pieza a pieza. Si se cumple nosotros cumplimos y si no, no votamos", ha querido especificar Nogueras. Entrevista completa en RNE Audio.Escuchar audio

En Las mañanas de RNE hablamos con Míriam Nogueras, portavoz de Junts en el Congreso de los Diputados. Sobre la negociación de la senda de déficit, cuya tramitación fue suspendida por el Gobierno por falta de apoyos: "Nosotros nunca nos hemos ido de la negociación. Este gobierno no tiene mayoría y nosotros siempre hemos dicho que nunca daremos apoyo a cambio de nada", insiste la portavoz de la formación independentista. "Hemos mantenido esta coherencia. Siempre hemos dicho que votaremos aquello que mejore la situación en Cataluña para los ciudadanos de Cataluña. Los ayuntamientos de Cataluña necesitan atender emergencia social y para eso tienen que poder mover dinero. Y la senda que nos propusieron en julio no es suficiente", lamenta Nogueras. "Si es beneficioso para Cataluña, es lo que me importa y para esto estamos. Si alguna de las políticas que nosotros defendemos además beneficia a otras [comunidades], pues a mí me parece maravilloso, pero nosotros estamos aquí para Cataluña", insiste la portavoz en que Junts no forma parte de ningún bloque y que los siete votos de su formación son prácticamente necesarios para todo.Nogueras recalca que la estabilidad de la legislatura, de su apoyo al Gobierno, irá relacionada en los acuerdos que se cierren y que se avance en estos acuerdos: "Si no hay avances, no hay estabilidad". Critica al presidente de la Generalitat, Salvador Illa, ya que considera que la senda de déficit que quería aprobar el PSOE "no es buena para Cataluña y no soluciona las necesidades de los catalanes". "Lo que hacemos nosotros es muy sencillo. ¿Tú necesitas los votos de Junts? Pues negocia con Junts. Si cumples hay votos, si no cumples no hay votos. Pero esto es. Es sencillo, me parece de sentido común", sentencia.Entrevista completa en RNE Audio.Escuchar audio

Curso político de infarto. El Gobierno nos tiene acostumbrados a funcionar casi sin oxígeno. El contexto de fragmentación y bloqueo no es exclusivo de España. Macron está muerto y se empeña en actuar como si no se hubiese producido ningún cambio en las urnas. Actuar "como si" empieza a estar de moda. La prórroga de los Presupuestos es una mala noticia.

A pesar del escenario incierto en Venezuela, todo lo sucedido hasta ahora era previsible. Sabemos que la victoria de Maduro no va a resolver los problemas del país. Para hacer creíble el proceso, debemos tener acceso a todas las actas. Los aliados clave de Maduro -China, Rusia...- seguirán a su lado. Quedan pocas dudas de que Venezuela es una autocracia electoral.

No es casualidad que el intento de asesinato de Donald Trump llegue en un momento de extrema polarización. Lo escalofriante es que la gente piensa que todavía pueden venir cosas peores hasta las elecciones presidenciales. Según una encuesta del New York Times, un 10% defendía el uso de la violencia política. Lo más curioso es que buena parte de los partidarios de Trump culparán a los demócratas por presentarlo como una amenaza existencial para la democracia. Pero lo cierto es que Biden lo ha condenado.

durée : 00:32:34 - L'Entretien littéraire de Mathias Enard - par : Mathias Énard - Mathias Enard s'entretient avec la philosophe, dramaturge et romancière Mériam Korichi alors que paraît "Spinoza Code" aux éditions Grasset. "Spinoza Code" est un récit historique sur les traces du manuscrit de l'Ethique de Spinoza. - invités : Mériam Korichi Spécialiste de Spinoza, dramaturge et metteure en scène, créatrice des nuits de la philosophie

Xeev New South Wales tau tsim ib co cai tso cai rau tub ceev xwm muaj peev xwm tshawb tej tej hluas hnoob nyoog tsis tau nto 18 xyoo yam tsis tas qhia tej laj thawj thiab tsis tas tau ntawv tso cai tshawb ntawm tsev hais plaub,...

Pierre-Édouard Deldique reçoit dans Idées : Mériam Korichi, docteure en Philosophie, dramaturge, auteure de « Spinoza code » chez Grasset.

Pierre-Édouard Deldique reçoit dans Idées : Mériam Korichi, docteure en Philosophie, dramaturge, auteure de « Spinoza code » chez Grasset.

podcast recorded with enacast.com

Luciano Potter, Kelly Matos e Paulo Germano trazem as principais informações do dia sobre comportamento, cultura, humor, futebol, cotidiano, política e opinião. O Timeline Gaúcha vai ao ar de segunda a sexta-feira, das 10h às 11h, com transmissão simultânea no YouTube

No Mondolivro desta terça-feira, Afonso Borges comenta sobre o livro "Tempos Extremos". Confira! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Europe is often cited for its world-class scientific talent and research universities. And yet, so much potential for innovation remains untapped due to IP ownership rules that can make spinout companies un-investable and hard to scale. Riam Kanso, Ph.D, wants to change that. As founder and CEO of venture program Conception X, she's on a  mission to accelerate the commercialization of scientific breakthroughs by helping Ph.D students launch start-ups — without having to drop out of school. To date, they've worked with 360 PhD teams from 50+ universities who have gone on to raise £74 million. In the latest episode of The High-EQ Founder, we talked about: why PhDs actually have more entrepreneurial traits than most people realize do's and don'ts for building your board and how to leverage their strengths how the “American” attitude toward failure has helped her be more resilient and why NOT getting a £5 million grant turned out to be better than getting it Follow Riam on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/riamkanso/ Subscribe to The High-EQ Founder newsletter: renitakalhorn.com/newsletter  

In this episode we are joined by Ossi Ollinaho and Máriam Abbas. Ossi is a project researcher from the TreesForDev project leading the work package that is looking at Mozambique. Máriam is a researcher from Observatório do Meio Rural (OMR), in Mozambique, who is coordinating the research line “Environment and Rural Areas”, which explores, among other topics, the impacts of climate change on agriculture, the causes of deforestation and mainstreaming biodiversity in the agricultural sector.  Ossi and Máriam give us insight into why Mozambique is one of the case study countries in the TreesForDev project. Agriculture accounts for approximately 25 percent of the GDP of the country. Thus, there is a large rural population, and the forest has a very important role in the rural populations' livelihood prospects. They reflect on the economic system and the underlying extractivist logics that are often incompatible with improving local conditions.  Want to learn more about the TreesForDev project? www.treesfordev.fi Want to learn more about our collaborator in Mozambique, Observatório do Meio Rural (OMR)? www.omrmz.org Want to learn more about Siemenpuu Foundation's work in Mozambique? https://siemenpuu.org/en/countries/mozambique/  --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/exalt-initiative/message

Aquest dimarts entrevistem Míriam Rodríguez, regidora del PSC a l'Ajuntament de Lloret de Mar.

Federico habla con Miguel Ángel Pérez y Rubén Fernández los problemas para que Sánchez apruebe la Ley de Amnistía.

No le falta razón al catedrático Vicente Guilarte, presidente del Consejo General del Poder Judicial, al calificar de pesada a Míriam Nogueras por sus constantes e indocumentados ataques contra los jueces. La verdad es que se queda corto. Estamos en tiempos aciagos donde cualquier diputado o diputada sin ninguna formación jurídica puede aprovechar los privilegios e inmunidades de su cargo para insultar a prestigiosos magistrados que no hacen otra cosa que ejercer sus funciones jurisdiccionales. Nada que ver con los brillantes juristas que accedieron al Congreso de los Diputados. Nogueras es muy pesada, tiene un discurso simplón y es una gran ignorante en estos temas. Es posible que sea sabia en otros, pero lo desconozco.

Santiago González comenta a los comentarios de los tonnntos patrios como Errejón y las maniobras de la "mascota" de Míriam Nogueras.

Crítica personal del libro de Míriam del Río "Turismo dark" editado por Luciérnaga Precio: 17,95 € 223 páginas.

Episodio 1260Hablamos hoy con la escritora y asesora de crianza respetuosa Míriam Tirado a raíz de su último libro, Sentir, publicado por Grijalbo. Libro que comenta Míriam al final del programa: Ábrete a lo inesperado de Tosha Silver.Canal de Telegram de Madresfera https://t.me/NoticiasMadresferaWeb: https://madresfera.com/Newsletter semanal: https://www.madresfera.com/newsletter/

Xov xwm luv tshaj tawm rau hnub zwj Feej (Wednesday news 15.11.2023).

A las puertas del pleno de investidura de Pedro Sánchez, la portavoz de Junts per Catalunya en el Congreso de los Diputados, Míriam Nogueras, ofrece una entrevista al informativo 24 horas de RNE. Nogueras se muestra satisfecha con la proposición de ley de amnistía, que define como "necesaria". Cree que el origen de las protestas en la calle no es este texto ni el gobierno de Pedro Sánchez, sino un conflicto histórico entre Catalunya y España: "La amnistía es el dedo, el tema de Catalunya es la luna". La portavoz de Junts resta importancia al registro de la ley en solitario por parte del PSOE: "Tampoco nos hubiera importado si nos hubieran pedido que firmáramos, pero no creo que haya conflicto. Se está haciendo de una anécdota categoría".Del acuerdo con el Partido Socialista, Nogueras destaca "la narrativa" , el cambio de paradigma. "Lo que estamos demostrando es que todo aquello que nosotros pedimos cabe dentro de la Constitución. Nos han vendido durante muchos años que no, pero sí cabe", asegura. Con todo, insiste en la cláusula de cobrar por avanzado: "Si no hay avances, no va a haber legislatura. Si lo que se pretendía era sumar a un partido más a este bloque progresista español, los de Junts no son los votos que están buscando". Pese a su actual voluntad de pactar, Nogueras asegura que nunca renunciarán a la independencia: "Si todas las vías quedan agotadas, queda también la vía de la unilateralidad". Escuchar audio

Celine Byrne came into studio for a chat about many things including the RIAM alumni 'Homecoming concert' on Sat 21 Oct

Junts per Catalunya ha obtenido siete escaños en el Congreso de los Diputados en las elecciones generales del 23 de julio. Su abstención sería clave para una hipotética investidura del socialista Pedro Sánchez con el apoyo de Sumar, ERC, EH Bildu, PNV y BNG. Míriam Nogueras, candidata de Junts, pone la pelota en el techo del PSOE y defiende la integridad de su partido: "Quien quiera negociar con nosotros sabe muy bien quienes somos, lo que somos y lo que representamos". Y añade: "Quien lleva años bloqueando Cataluña es el Gobierno español, sea de qué color sea".Nogueras defiende la necesidad de unidad en el independentismo y tiende la mano a Esquerra Republicana: "El balance de estos 4 años para Cataluña y para el independentismo no es bueno". Asegura que no se ha avanzado en la independencia ni ha mejorado la situación económica: "Los votos catalanes hacía mucho tiempo que no salían tan baratos". Además, cree que no es una casualidad que al día siguiente de las elecciones la Fiscalía haya pedido la emisión de una nueva euroorden de detención para Carles Puigdemont."Nosotros no vamos a votar un gobierno PP-Vox", afirma Nogueras. Con todo, defiende que negociarán "de nación a nación" y no de partido a partido: "No tenemos que ir con la cabeza baja cuando son ellos los que nos necesitan a nosotros más que nosotros a ellos". Escuchar audio

La politóloga cree que el resultado de las elecciones generales “muestra la complejidad de lo que es España” y califica lo sucedido como una “sorpresa” que no vaticinaba nadie -tampoco las encuestas- que cree que se puede explicar por “una movilización extraordinaria de las izquierdas que se ha producido la última semana” y que los sondeos no han detectado.

Hilda Milner, Recorder Teacher and Conductor of the RIAM Recorder Ensemble along with Clara and Maitiú who are both RIAM students joined Anton on the show to discuss a new 3-part documentary series that follows a number of exceptionally gifted students and their teachers at the Royal Irish Academy of Music called 'Face the Music'.

This year for the first time, the RHA Gallery has included a work generated by AI in its annual exhibition, which received criticism - Up Late, a new poetry collection by Nick Laird. - White House Plumbers, a new mini-series set behind the scenes of the Watergate scandal - RIAM students get the chance to perform with the NSO - Graham Knuttel RIP.

Juan Carlos Pichardo, Ñonguito, Harold Diaz, Oscar Carrasquillo, Katherin Amesty, Begoña Guillen y Anier Barros

Juan Carlos Pichardo, Ñonguito, Harold Diaz, Oscar Carrasquillo, Katherin Amesty, Begoña Guillen y Anier Barros

Jonah is a 5th Year Medical student at the University of Dundee. Jonah has been whitewater kayaking since he was 12. This passion recently took Jonah as part of the British University Kayak Expedition team to Central Kalimantan, Borneo. This 6 week expedition focused on descending unexplored sections of whitewater deep within the rainforest. The team had to be totally self-sufficient and with no support team everything had to fit in the back of a kayak. Jonah discusses the challenges of delivering medical care not only as a medical student, but with a first aid kit small enough to fit in the back of a boat. All the while navigating grade V rapids, flashfloods and dealing with unfriendly locals. He chatted to Deb Swann about planning and executing an expedition as a medical student.

I had fun chatting with Aarthi and Sriram.We discuss what it takes to be successful in technology, what Sriram would say if Elon tapped him to be the next CEO of Twitter, why more married couples don't start businesses together, and how Aarthi hires and finds 10x engineers.Aarthi Ramamurthy and Sriram Krishnan are the hosts of The Good Times Show. They have had leading roles in several technology companies from Meta to Twitter to Netflix and have been founders and investors. Sriram is currently a general partner at a16z crypto and Aarthi is an angel investor.Watch on YouTube. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or any other podcast platform. Timestamps(00:00:00) - Intro(00:01:19) - Married Couples Co-founding Businesses(00:09:53) - 10x Engineers(00:16:00) - 15 Minute Meetings(00:22:57) - a16z's Edge?(00:26:42) - Future of Twitter(00:30:58) - Is Big Tech Overstaffed?(00:38:37) - Next CEO of Twitter?(00:43:13) - Why Don't More Venture Capitalists Become Founders?(00:47:32) - Role of Boards(00:52:03) - Failing Upwards(00:56:00) - Underrated CEOs(01:02:18) - Founder Education(01:06:27) - What TV Show Would Sriram Make?(01:10:14) - Undervalued Founder ArchetypesTranscriptThis transcript was autogenerated and thus may contain errors.[00:00:00] Aarthi: it's refreshing to have Elon come in and say, we are gonna work really hard. We are gonna be really hardcore about how we build things.[00:00:05] Dwarkesh: Let's say Elon and says Tomorrow, Sriram, would you be down to be the [00:00:08] Sriram: CEO of Twitter Absolutely not. Absolutely not. But I am married to someone. We [00:00:12] Aarthi: used to do overnights at Microsoft. Like we'd just sleep under our desk,, until the janitor would just , poke us out of there , I really need to vacuum your cubicle. Like, get out of here. There's such joy in , Finding those moments where you work hard and you're feeling really good about it. [00:00:25] Sriram: You'd be amazed at how many times Aarthi and I would have a conversation where be, oh, this algorithm thing.I remember designing it, and now we are on the other side We want to invest in something , where we think the team and the company is going to win and if they do win, there's huge value to be unlocked. [00:00:40] Dwarkesh: Okay. Today I have the, uh, good pleasure to have Arty and Sriram on the podcast and I'm really excited about this.So you guys have your own show, the Arty Andre Good Time show. Um, you guys have had some of the top people in tech and entertainment on Elon Musk, mark Zuckerberg, Andrew Yang, and you guys are both former founders. Advisors, investors, uh, general partner at Anderson Horowitz, and you're an angel investor and an advisor now.Um, so yeah, there's so much to talk about. Um, obviously there's also the, uh, recent news about your, uh, your involvement on, uh, twitter.com. Yeah, yeah. Let's get started. [00:01:19] Married Couples Starting Businesses[00:01:19] Dwarkesh: My first question, you guys are married, of course. People talk about getting a co-founder as finding a spouse, and I'm curious why it's not the case that given this relationship why more married people don't form tech startups.Is, does that already happen, [00:01:35] Aarthi: or, um, I actually am now starting to see a fair bit of it. Uhhuh, . Um, I, I do agree that wasn't a norm before. Um, I think, uh, I, I think I remember asking, uh, pg p the same thing when I went through yc, and I think he kind of pointed to him and Jessica like, you know, YC was their startup , and so, you know, there were even pride.There are a lot of husband and wife, uh, companies. Over the last like decade or so. So I'm definitely seeing that more mainstream. But yeah, you're right, it hasn't been the norm before. Yeah, the, the good time show is our project. It's [00:02:09] Sriram: our startup. Very, I mean, there are some good historical examples. Cisco, for example, uh, came from, uh, uh, husband, wife as a few other examples.I think, you know, on, on the, in, on the pro side, uh, you know, being co-founders, uh, you need trust. You need to really know each other. Uh, you, you go through a lot of like heavy emotional burdens together. And there's probably, and if you, you're for the spouse, hopefully you probably have a lot of chemistry and understanding, and that should help.On the con side, I think one is you, you're prob you know, you, you're gonna show up at work, you know, and startups are really hard, really intense. And you come home and both of you are gonna the exact same wavelength, the exact same time, going through the exact same highs and lows as opposed to two people, two different jobs have maybe differing highs and lows.So that's really hard. Uh, the second part of it is, uh, in a lot of. Work situations, it may just be more challenging where people are like, well, like, you know, person X said this person Y said this, what do I do? Uh, and if you need to fire somebody or you know, something weird happens corporate in a corporate manner, that may also be really hard.Uh, but having said that, you know, uh, [00:03:13] Aarthi: you know, yeah, no, I think both of those are like kind of overblown , like, you know, I think the reason why, um, you know, you're generally, they say you need to have you, it's good to have co-founders is so that you can kind of like write the emotional wave in a complimentary fashion.Uh, and you know, if one person's like really depressed about something, the other person can like pull them out of it and have a more rational viewpoint. I feel like in marriages it works even better. So I feel like to your first point, They know each other really well. You're, you're, you are going to bring your work to home.There is no separation between work and home as far as a startup is concerned. So why not do it together? Oh, [00:03:51] Sriram: well, I think there's one problem, uh, which is, uh, we are kind of unique because we've been together for over 21 years now, and we start for, we've been before, uh, let's not. Wow. There's gonna be some fact checking 19 on this video.99. Close enough. Close enough, right? Like close enough. He wishes he was 21. Oh, right, right, right. Gosh, feels like 21. We have do some, um, [00:04:15] Aarthi: editing on this video. No, no, no. I think 20 years of virtually knowing, 19 years of in-person. [00:04:20] Sriram: There we go. Right. Uh, fact check accurate. Um, ex experts agree. But, um, you know, but when you first met, we, we originally, even before we dating, we were like, Hey, we wanna do a company together.And we bonded over technology, like our first conversation on Yahoo Messenger talking about all these founders and how we wanted to be like them. And we actually then worked together pretty briefly when you were in Microsoft. Uh, before we actually started dating. We were on these sort of talent teams and we kind of met each of the word context.I think a lot of. You know, one is they have never worked together. Um, and so being in work situations, everything from how you run a meeting to how you disagree, uh, you know, uh, is just going to be different. And I think that's gonna be a learning curve for a lot of couples who be like, Hey, it's one thing to have a strong, stable relationship at home.It'll be a different thing to, you know, be in a meeting and you're disagreeing art's meetings very differently from I do. She obsesses over metrics. I'm like, ah, it's close enough. It's fine. , uh, it's close enough. It's fine. as e uh, here already. But, uh, so I do think there's a learning curve, a couples who is like, oh, working together is different than, you know, raising your family and being together.I mean, obviously gives you a strong foundation, but it's not the same thing. Have you guys [00:05:25] Dwarkesh: considered starting a company or a venture together at some point? [00:05:28] Aarthi: Yeah. Um, we've, uh, we've always wanted to do a project together. I don't know if it's a, a startup or a company or a venture. You have done a project together,Yeah, exactly. I think, uh, almost to today. Two years ago we started the Good Time Show, um, and we started at, uh, live Audio on Clubhouse. And, you know, we recently moved it onto video on YouTube. And, um, it's, it's been really fun because now I get to see like, it, it's neither of our full-time jobs, uh, but we spend enough, um, just cycles thinking through what we wanna do with it and what, uh, how to have good conversations and how to make it useful for our audience.So that's our [00:06:06] Sriram: project together. Yep. And we treat it like a, with the intellectual heft of a startup, which is, uh, we look at the metrics, uh, and we are like, oh, this is a good week. The metrics are up into the right and, you know, how do we, you know, what is working for our audience? You know, what do we do to get great guests?What do we do to [00:06:21] Aarthi: get, yeah, we just did our first, uh, in-person meetup, uh, for listeners of the podcast in Chennai. It was great. We had like over a hundred people who showed up. And it was also like, you know, typical startup style, like meet your customers and we could like go talk to these people in person and figure out like what do they like about it?Which episodes do they really enjoy? And it's one thing to see YouTube comments, it's another to like actually in person engage with people. So I think, you know, we started it purely accidentally. We didn't really expect it to be like the show that we are, we are in right now, but we really happy. It's, it's kind of turned out the way it has.[00:06:59] Sriram: Absolutely. And, and it also kind of helps me scratch an edge, which is, uh, you know, building something, you know, keeps you close to the ground. So being able to actually do the thing yourself as opposed to maybe tell someone else, telling you how to do the, so for example, it, it being video editing or audio or how thumbnails, thumbnails or, uh, just the mechanics of, you know, uh, how to build anything.So, uh, I, I dot think it's important. Roll up your sleeves metaphorically and get your hands dirty and know things. And this really helped us understand the world of creators and content. Uh, and it's fun and [00:07:31] Aarthi: go talk to other creators. Uh, like I think when we started out this thing on YouTube, I think I remember Shram just reached out to like so many creators being like, I wanna understand how it works for you.Like, what do you do? And these are people who like, who are so accomplished, who are so successful, and they do this for a living. And we clearly don. And so, uh, just to go learn from these experts. It's, it's kind of nice, like to be a student again and to just learn, uh, a new industry all over again and figure out how to actually be a creator on this platform.Well, you know [00:08:01] Dwarkesh: what's really interesting is both of you have been, uh, executives and led product in social media companies. Yeah. And so you are, you designed the products, these creators, their music, and now on the other end, you guys are building [00:08:12] Sriram: the, oh, I have a great phrase for it, right? Like, somebody, every once in a while somebody would be like, Hey, you know what, uh, you folks are on the leadership team of some of these companies.Why don't you have hundreds of millions of followers? Right? And I would go, Hey, look, it's not like every economist is a billionaire, , uh, uh, you know, it doesn't work that way. Uh, but during that is a parallel, which, which is, uh, you'd be amazed at how many times Aarthi and I would have a conversation where be, oh, this algorithm thing.I remember designing it, or I was in the meeting when this thing happened, and now we are on the other side, which is like, Hey, you might be the economist who told somebody to implement a fiscal policy. And now we are like, oh, okay, how do I actually go do this and create values and how? Anyway, how do we do exactly.Create an audience and go build something interesting. So there is definitely some irony to it, uh, where, uh, but I think hopefully it does give us some level of insight where, uh, we have seen, you know, enough of like what actually works on social media, which is how do you build a connection with your audience?Uh, how do you build, uh, content? How do you actually do it on a regular, uh, teams? I think [00:09:07] Aarthi: the biggest difference is we don't see the algorithm as a bra, as a black box. I think we kind of see it as like when the, with the metrics, we are able to, one, have empathy for the teams building this. And two, I think, uh, we kind of know there's no big magic bullet.Like I think a lot of this is about showing up, being really consistent, um, you know, being able to like put out some really interesting content that people actually want to, and you know, I think a lot of people forget about that part of it and kind of focus. If you did this one thing, your distribution goes up a lot and here's this like, other like secret hack and you know Sure.Like those are like really short term stuff, but really in the long term, the magic is to just like keep at it. Yeah. And, uh, put out really, really good content. [00:09:48] Sriram: Yeah. Yeah. And yeah, absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. Um, that's good to hear. . [00:09:53] 10x Engineers[00:09:53] Dwarkesh: Um, so you've both, um, led teams that have, you know, dozens or even hundreds of people.Um, how easy is it for you to tell who the 10 X engineers are? Is it something that you as managers and executives can tell easily or [00:10:06] Sriram: no? Uh, absolutely. I think you can tell this very easily or repeat of time and it doesn't, I think a couple of ways. One is, uh, Uh, before, let's say before you work with someone, um, 10 x people just don't suddenly start becoming 10 x.They usually have a history of becoming 10 x, uh, of, you know, being really good at what they do. And you can, you know, the cliche line is you can sort of connect the dots. Uh, you start seeing achievements pile up and achievements could be anything. It could be a bunch of projects. It could be a bunch of GitHub code commits.It could be some amazing writing on ck, but whatever it is, like somebody just doesn't show up and become a 10 x person, they probably have a track record of already doing it. The second part of it is, I've seen this is multiple people, uh, who are not named so that they don't get hired from the companies actually want them to be in, or I can then hire them in the future is, uh, you know, they will make incredibly rapid progress very quickly.So, uh, I have a couple of examples and almost independently, I know it's independently, so I have a couple of. Um, and I actually, and name both, right? Like, so one is, uh, this guy named, uh, Vijay Raji, uh, who, uh, was probably one of Facebook's best engineers. He's now the CEO of a company called Stats. And, um, he was probably my first exposure to the real TenX engineer.And I remembered this because, uh, you know, at the time I was. Kind of in my twenties, I had just joined Facebook. I was working on ads, and he basically built a large part of Facebook's ad system over the weekend. And what he would do is he would just go, and then he con he [00:11:24] Aarthi: continued to do that with Facebook marketplace.Yeah. Like he's done this like over and over and over [00:11:28] Sriram: again. . Yeah. And, and it's not that, you know, there's one burst of genius. It's just this consistent stream of every day that's a code checkin stuff is working. New demo somebody, he sent out a new bill or something working. And so before like a week or two, you just like a, you know, you running against Usain Bolt and he's kind of running laps around you.He's so far ahead of everyone else and you're like, oh, this guy is definitely ahead. Uh, the second story I have is, uh, of, uh, John Carmack, uh, you know, who's legend and I never worked with him in, uh, directly with, you know, hopefully someday I can fix. But, uh, somebody told me a story about him. Which is, uh, that the person told me story was like, I never thought a individual could replace the output of a hundred percent team until I saw John.And there's a great story where, um, you know, and so John was the most senior level at Facebook and from a hr, you know, employment insecurity perspective for an individual contributor, and it at, at that level, at Facebook, uh, for folks who kind of work in these big tech companies, it is the most, the highest tier of accomplishment in getting a year in a performance review is something called xcs Expectations, or, sorry, redefines, right?Which basically means like, you have redefined what it means for somebody to perform in this level, right? Like, it's like somebody, you know, like somebody on a four minute mile, I'll be running a two minute mile or whatever, right? You're like, oh, and, and it is incredibly hard sometimes. You doing, and this guy John gets it three years in a row, right?And so there's this leadership team of all the, you know, the really most important people on Facebook. And they're like, well, we should really promote John, right? Like, because he's done this three years in a row, he's changing the industry. Three years in a row and then they realized, oh wait, there is no level to promote him to Nick be CEOWell, maybe I don't think he wanted to. And so, uh, the story I heard, and I dunno, it's true, but I like to believe it's true, is they invented a level which still now only John Carmack has gotten. Right. And, um, and I think, you know, it's his level of productivity, uh, his, uh, intellect, uh, and the consistency over time and mu and you know, if you talk to anybody, Facebook work with him, he's like, oh, he replaced hundred people, teams all by themselves and maybe was better than a hundred percent team just because he had a consistency of vision, clarity, and activity.So those are [00:13:32] Aarthi: the two stories I've also noticed. I think, uh, actually sheam, I think our first kind of exposure to 10 x engineer was actually Barry born, uh, from Microsoft. So Barry, um, uh, basically wrote pretty much all the emulation engines and emulation systems that we all use, uh, and uh, just prolific, uh, and I think in addition to what Fred had said with like qualities and tenets, Um, the, I've generally seen these folks to also be like low ego and kind of almost have this like responsibility to, um, mentor coach other people.Uh, and Barry kind of like took us under his wing and he would do these like Tuesday lunches with us, where we would just ask like, you know, we were like fresh out of college and we just ask these like really dumb questions on, you know, um, scaling things and how do you build stuff. And I was working on, uh, run times and loaders and compilers and stuff.And so he would just take the time to just answer our questions and just be there and be really like, nice about it. I remember when you moved to Redmond, he would just like spend a weekend just like, oh yeah. Driving you about and just doing things like that, but very low ego and within their teams and their art, they're just considered to be legends.Yes. Like, you know, everybody would be like, oh, Barry Bond. Yeah, of course. [00:14:47] Sriram: Yeah. It, I can't emphasize enough the consistency part of it. Um, you know, with Barry. Or I gotta briefly work with Dave Cutler, who's kind of the father of modern operating systems, uh, is every day you're on this email li list at the time, which would show you check-ins as they happen.They would have something every single day, um, every day, and it'll be tangible and meaty and you know, and you just get a sense that this person is not the same as everybody else. Um, by the, this couple of people I can actually point to who haven't worked with, uh, but I follow on YouTube or streaming. Uh, one is, uh, Andrea Ling who builds Serenity Os we had a great episode with him.Oh, the other is George Hart's, uh, geo Hart. And I urge people, if you haven't, I haven't worked with either of them, uh, but if I urge which to kinda watch their streams, right? Because, uh, you go like, well, how does the anti killing build a web browser on an operating system? Which he builds by himself in such a sharp period of time and he watches stream and he's not doing some magical new, you know, bit flipping sorting algorithm anybody has, nobody has seen before.He's just doing everything you would do, but. Five bits of speed. I, yep, exactly. [00:15:48] Dwarkesh: I I'm a big fan of the George Hot Streams and Yeah, that's exactly what, you know, it's like yeah, you, he's also curling requests and he is also, you know, you know, spinning up an experiment in a Jupyter Notebook, but yeah, just doing it [00:15:58] Aarthi: away way faster, way efficiently.Yeah. [00:16:00] 15 Minute Meetings[00:16:00] Dwarkesh: Yeah. That's really interesting. Um, so ar Arthur, I'm, you've gone through Y Combinator and famously they have that 15 minute interview Yes. Where they try to grok what your business is and what your potential is. Yeah, yeah. But just generally, it seems like in Silicon Valley you guys have, make a lot of decisions in terms of investing or other kinds of things.You, in very short calls, you know. Yeah. . Yeah. And how much can you really, what is it that you're learning in these 15 minute calls when you're deciding, should I invest in this person? What is their potential? What is happening in that 15 minutes? [00:16:31] Aarthi: Um, I can speak about YC from the other side, from like, uh, being a founder pitching, right.I think, yes, there is a 15 minute interview, but before that, there is a whole YC application process. And, uh, I think even for the, for YC as, uh, this bunch of the set of investors, I'm sure they're looking for specific signals, but for me as a founder, the application process was so useful, um, because it really makes you think about what you're building.Why are you building this? Are you the right person to be building this? Who are the other people you should be hiring? And so, I mean, there are like few questions or like, one of my favorite questions is, um, how have you hacked a non-computer system to your advantage? Yeah. . And it kind of really makes you think about, huh, and you kind of noticed that many good founders have that pattern of like hacking other systems to their advantage.Um, and so to me, I think more than the interview itself, the process of like filling out the application form, doing that little video, all of that gives you better, um, it gives you the, the entire scope of your company in your head because it's really hard when you have this idea and you're kind of like noodling about with it and talking to a few people.You don't really know if this is a thing. To just like crystallize the whole vision in your head. I think, uh, that's on point. Yes. Um, the 15 minute interview for me, honestly, it was like kind of controversial because, uh, I went in that morning, I did the whole, you know, I, I had basically stayed at the previous night, uh, building out this website and, uh, that morning I showed up and I had my laptop open.I'm like really eager to like tell them what you're building and I keep getting cut off and I realize much later that that's kind of my design. Yeah. And you just like cut off all the time. Be like, why would anybody use this? And you start to answer and be like, oh, but I, I don't agree with that. And there's just like, and it, it's like part of it is like, makes you upset, but part of it is also like, it makes you think how to compress all that information in a really short amount of time and tell them.Um, and so that interview happens, I feel really bummed out because I kind of had this website I wanted to show them. So while walking out the door, I remember just showing Gary, Dan, um, the website and he like kind of like. Scrolls it a little bit, and he is like, this is really beautifully done. And I was like, thank you.I've been wanting to show you this for 15 minutes. Um, and I, I mentioned it to Gary recently and he laughed about it. And then, uh, I didn't get selected in that timeframe. They gave me a call and they said, come back again in the evening and we are going to do round two because we are not sure. Yeah. And so the second interview there was PG and Jessica and they both were sitting there and they were just grueling me.It was a slightly longer interview and PG was like, I don't think this is gonna work. And I'm like, how can you say that? I think this market's really big. And I'm just like getting really upset because I've been waiting this whole day to like get to this point. And he's just being like cynical and negative.And then at some point he starts smiling at Jessica and I'm like, oh, okay. They're just like baiting me to figure it out. And so that was my process. And I, by the evening, I remember Shera was working at. I remember driving down from Mountain View to Facebook and Sheam took me to the Sweet Stop. Oh yeah.Which is like their, you know, Facebook has this like, fancy, uh, sweet store, like the ice cream store. I [00:19:37] Sriram: think they had a lot more perks over the years, but that was very fancy back then. [00:19:40] Aarthi: So I had like two scoops of ice cream in each hand in, and, uh, the phone rang and I was like, oh, hold onto this. And I grabbed it and I, and you know, I think it was Michael Sibu or I don't know who, but somebody called me and said, you're through.So that was kind of my process. So even though there was only 15 minutes, mine was actually much longer after. But even before the, the application process was like much more detailed. So it sounds [00:20:01] Dwarkesh: like the 15 minutes it's really there. Like, can they rattle you? Can they, can they [00:20:06] Aarthi: you and how do you react?Yeah, yeah, yeah. Um, I also think they look for how sex you can be in explaining what the problem is. They do talk to hundreds of companies. It is a lot. And so I think, can you compress a lot of it and convince, if you can convince these folks here in three months or four months time, how are you going to do demo day and convince a whole room full of investors?[00:20:27] Sriram: Yeah. Yeah. For, I think it's a bit different for us, uh, on the VC side, uh, because two things. One, number one is, uh, the day, you know, so much of it is having a prepared mind before you go into the meeting. And, for example, if you're meeting a. very early. Are we investing before having met every single other person who's working in this space, who has ideas in the space.So you generally know what's going on, you know, what the kind of technologies are or go to market approaches are. You've probably done a bunch of homework already. It's usually, uh, it does happen where you meet somebody totally cold and uh, you really want to invest, but most often you've probably done some homework at least in this space, if not the actual company.Um, and so when you're in the meeting, I think you're trying to judge a couple of things. And these are obviously kind of stolen from Christ Dixon and others. Um, one is their ability to kind of go walk you through their idea, ma. And so very simply, um, you know, the idea MAs is, uh, and I think say the biology of Christen came with this, the idea that, hey, um, uh, How you got to the idea for your company really matters because you went and explored all the data ends, all the possibilities.You're managing around for years and years, and you've kind of come to the actual solution. And the way you can tell whether somebody's gone through the idea Mac, is when you ask 'em questions and they tell you about like five different things they've tried, did not work. And it, it's really hard to fake it.I mean, we, you maybe fake it for like one or two questions, but if you talk about like how we tried X, Y, and Z and they have like an opinion what of the opinions, if they've thought about it, you're like, okay, this person really studied the idea, ma. And that's very powerful. Uh, the second part of it is, uh, you know, Alex sample.Uh, uh, one of my partner says this, Yes, some this thing called the Manifestation Framework, which sounds like a self-help book on Amazon, but it's not, uh, uh uh, you know, but what if is, is like, you know, so many, so much of early stage startup founders is about the ability to manifest things. Uh, manifest capital, manifest the first hire, uh, manifest, uh, the first BD partnership.And, um, usually, you know, if you can't, if you don't have a Cigna sign of doing that, it's really hard to then after raising money, go and close this amazing hotshot engineer or salesperson or close this big partnership. And so in the meeting, right? If you can't convince us, right? And these are people, our day job is to give you money, right?Like, if I spent a year without giving anybody money, I'll probably get fired. If you can't, uh, if you can't convince us to give you money, right? If you wanna find probably a hard time to close this amazing engineer and get that person to come over from Facebook or close this amazing partnership against a competitor.And so that's kind of a judge of that. So it is never about the actual 60 Minutes where you're like, we, we are making up of a large part of makeup of mind is. That one or two conversations, but there's so much which goes in before and after that. Yeah, yeah. Speaking of [00:22:57] What is a16z's edge?[00:22:57] Dwarkesh: venture capital, um, I, I'm curious, so interest and Horowitz, and I guess why Combinator too?Um, but I mean, any other person who's investing in startups, they were started at a time when there were much less capital in the space, and today of course, there's been so much more capital pour into space. So how do these firms, like how does A 16 C continue to have edge? What is this edge? How can I sustain it [00:23:20] Sriram: given the fact that so much more capital is entered into the space?We show up on podcasts like the Lunar Society, , and so if you are watching this and you have a startup idea, Uh, come to us, right? Uh, no. Come, come to the Lunar society. . Well, yes. I mean, maybe so Trust me, you go in pat, you're gonna have a find, uh, a Thk pat right there. Uh, actually I, you think I joked, but there's a bit of truth.But no, I've had [00:23:40] Dwarkesh: like lu this [00:23:40] Aarthi: suddenly became very different [00:23:43] Sriram: conversation. I have had people, this is a totally ludicrous [00:23:46] Dwarkesh: idea, but I've had people like, give me that idea. And it's like, it sounds crazy to me because like, I don't know what, it's, what a company's gonna be successful, right? So, but I hasn't [00:23:55] Aarthi: become an investor.[00:23:57] Sriram: I honestly don't know. But it is something like what you're talking about Lu Society Fund one coming up, right? You heard it here first? Uh, uh, well, I think first of all, you know, I think there's something about the firm, uh, um, in terms of how it's set up philosophically and how it's set up, uh, kind of organizationally, uh, and our approach philosoph.The firm is an optimist, uh, uh, more than anything else. At the core of it, we are optimist. We are optimist about the future. We are optimist about the impact of founders on their, on the liberty to kind of impact that future. Uh, we are optimist at heart, right? Like I, I tell people like, you can't work at a six and z if you're not an optimist.That's at the heart of everything that we do. Um, and very tied to that is the idea that, you know, um, software is eating the world. It is, it's true. 10 years ago when Mark wrote that, peace is as true now, and we just see more and more of it, right? Like every week, you know, look at the week we are recording this.You know, everyone's been talking about chat, G p T, and like all the industries that can get shaped by chat, G P T. So our, our feature, our, our idea is that software is gonna go more and more. So, one way to look at this is, yes, a lot more capitalists enter the world, but there should be a lot more, right?Like, because these companies are gonna go bigger. They're gonna have bigger impacts on, uh, human lives and, and the world at large. So that's, uh, you know, uh, one school of thought, the other school of thought, uh, which I think you were asking about, say valuations, uh, et cetera. Is, uh, you know, um, again, one of my other partners, Jeff Jordan, uh, uh, always likes to tell people like, we don't go discount shopping, right?Our, the way we think about it is we want to, when we're investing in a market, We want to really map out the market, right? Uh, so for example, I work on crypto, uh, and, uh, you know, we, you know, if, if you are building something interesting in crypto and we haven't seen you, we haven't talked to you, that's a fail, that's a mess, right?We ideally want to see every single interesting founder company idea. And a category can be very loose. Crypto is really big. We usually segmented something else. Or if you look at enterprise infrastructure, you can take them into like, you know, AI or different layers and so on. But once you map out a category, you want to know everything.You wanna know every interesting person, every interesting founder you wanna be abreast of every technology change, every go to market hack, every single thing. You wanna know everything, right? And then, uh, the idea is that, uh, we would love to invest in, you know, the what is hopefully becomes the market.Set category, uh, or you know, somebody who's maybe close to the, the market leader. And our belief is that these categories will grow and, you know, they will capture huge value. Um, and as a whole, software is still can used to be undervalued by, uh, a, you know, the world. So, um, we, so, which is why, again, going back to what Jeff would say, he's like, we are not in the business of oh, we are getting a great deal, right?We, we are like, we want to invest in something which, where we think the team and the company and their approach is going to win in this space, and we want to help them win. And we think if they do win, there's a huge value to be unlocked. Yeah, I see. I see. Um, [00:26:42] Future of Twitter[00:26:42] Dwarkesh: let's talk about Twitter. [00:26:44] Sriram: Uh, . I need a drink. I need a drink.[00:26:48] Dwarkesh: um, Tell me, what is the future of Twitter? What is the app gonna look like in five years? You've, um, I mean obviously you've been involved with the Musk Venture recently, but, um, you've, you've had a senior position there. You were an executive there before a few years ago, and you've also been an executive at, uh, you've both been at Meta.So what [00:27:06] Sriram: is the future of Twitter? It's gonna be entertaining. Uh, uh, what is it El say the most entertaining outcome is the most, [00:27:12] Aarthi: uh, uh, like, best outcome is the most, uh, most likely outcome is the most entertaining outcome. [00:27:16] Sriram: Exactly right. So I think it's gonna be the most entertaining outcome. Um, I, I mean, I, I, I think a few things, uh, first of all, uh, ideally care about Twitter.Yeah. Uh, and all of my involvement, uh, you know, over the years, uh, uh, professionally, you know, uh, has, it's kind of. A lagging indicator to the value I got from the service person. I have met hundreds of people, uh, through Twitter. Uh, hundreds of people have reached out to me. Thousands. Exactly. Uh, and you know, I met Mark Andresen through Twitter.Uh, I met like, you know, uh, people are not very good friends of mine. We met through Twitter. We met at Twitter, right. There we go. Right. Uh, just [00:27:50] Aarthi: like incredible outsized impact. Yeah. Um, and I think it's really hard to understate that because, uh, right now it's kind of easy to get lost in the whole, you know, Elon, the previous management bio, like all of that.Outside of all of that, I think the thing I like to care about is, uh, focus on is the product and the product experience. And I think even with the product experience that we have today, which hasn't like, dramatically changed from for years now, um, it's still offering such outsized value for. If you can actually innovate and build really good product on top, I think it can, it can just be really, really good for humanity overall.And I don't even mean this in like a cheesy way. I really think Twitter as a tool could be just really, really effective and enormously good for everyone. Oh yeah. [00:28:35] Sriram: Twitter is I think, sort of methodically upstream of everything that happens in culture in uh, so many different ways. Like, um, you know, there was this, okay, I kinda eli some of the details, uh, but like a few years ago I remember there was this, uh, sort of this somewhat salacious, controversial story which happened in entertainment and uh, and I wasn't paying attention to, except that something caught my eye, which was that, uh, every story had the same two tweets.And these are not tweets from any famous person. It was just some, like, some, um, you know, somebody had some followers, but not a lot of, a lot of followers. And I. Why is this being quoted in every single story? Because it's not from the, you know, the person who was actually in the story or themselves. And it turned out that, uh, what had happened was, uh, you know, somebody wrote in the street, it had gone viral, um, it started trending on Twitter, um, and a bunch of people saw it.They started writing news stories about it. And by that afternoon it was now, you know, gone from a meme to now reality. And like in a lot of people entertainment say, kind of go respond to that. And I've seen this again and again, again, right? Uh, sports, politics, culture, et cetera. So Twitter is memetically upstream of so much of life.Uh, you know, one of my friends had said like, Twitter is more important than the real world. Uh, which I don't, I don't know about that, but, uh, you know, I do think it's, um, it has huge sort of, uh, culture shaping value. Yeah. I thing I think about Twitter is so much of. The network is very Lindy. So one of the things I'm sure from now is like five years from now, you know, what does that mean?Well that, uh, is that something which has kind of stood the test of time to some extent? And, um, and, uh, well the Lindy effect generally means, I don't think it's using this context with ideas like things which, with withstood the test of time tend to also with some test of time in the future, right? Like, like if we talked to Naim is like, well, people have lifting heavy weights and doing red wine for 2000 years, so let's continue doing that.It's probably a good thing. Um, but, but, but that's Twitter today. What is the future of Twitter? Well, uh, well, I think so one is, I think that's gonna continue to be true, right? 10 years from now, five years from now, it's still gonna be the metic battleground. It's still gonna be the place where ideas are shared, et cetera.Um, you know, I'm very. Unabashedly a a big fan of what Elon, uh, as a person, as a founder and what he's doing at Twitter. And my hope is that, you know, he can kind of canoe that and, you know, he's, you know, and I can't actually predict what he's gonna go Bill, he's kind of talked about it. Maybe that means bringing in other product ideas.Uh, I think he's talked about payments. He's talked about like having like longer form video. Uh, who knows, right? But I do know, like five years from now, it is still gonna be the place of like active conversation where people fight, yell, discuss, and maybe sometimes altogether. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, the Twitter, [00:30:58] Is Big Tech Overstaffed?[00:30:58] Dwarkesh: um, conversation has raised a lot of, a lot of questions about how over or understaffed, uh, these big tech companies are, and in particular, um, how many people you can get rid of and the thing basically functions or how fragile are these code bases?And having worked at many of these big tech companies, how, how big is the bus factor, would you guess? Like what, what percentage of people could I fire at the random big tech [00:31:22] Sriram: company? Why? I think, uh, [00:31:23] Aarthi: yeah, I think. That's one way to look at it. I think the way I see it is there are a few factors that go into this, right?Like pre covid, post covid, like through covid everybody became remote, remote teams. As you scaled, it was kind of also hard to figure out what was really going on in different parts of the organization. And I think a lot of inefficiencies were overcome by just hiring more people. It's like, oh, you know what, like that team, yeah, that project's like lagging, let's just like add 10 more people.And that's kind of like it became the norm. Yeah. And I think a lot of these teams just got bigger and bigger and bigger. I think the other part of it was also, um, you lot of how performance ratings and culture of like, moving ahead in your career path. And a lot of these companies were dependent on how big your team was and uh, and so every six months or year long cycle or whatever is your performance review cycle, people would be like, this person instead of looking at what has this person shipped or what has like the impact that this person's got had, uh, the team's done.It became more of like, well this person's got a hundred percent arc or 200% arc and next year they're gonna have a 10% increase and that's gonna be like this much. And you know, that was the conversation. And so a lot of the success and promo cycles and all of those conversations were tied around like number of headcount that this person would get under them as such, which I think is like a terrible way to think about how you're moving up the ladder.Um, you should really, like, even at a big company, you should really be thinking about the impact that you've had and customers you've reached and all of that stuff. And I think at some point people kind of like lost that, uh, and pick the more simpler metric, which just headcount and it's easy. Yeah. And to just scale that kind of thing.So I think now with Elon doing this where he is like cutting costs, and I think Elon's doing this for different set of reasons. You know, Twitter's been losing money and I think it's like driving efficiency. Like this is like no different. Anybody else who like comes in, takes over a business and looks at it and says, wait, we are losing money every day.We have to do something about this. Like, it's not about like, you know, cutting fat for the sake of it or anything. It's like this, this business is not gonna be viable if we keep it going the way it is. Yeah. And just pure economics. And so when he came in and did that, I'm now seeing this, and I'm sure Sheam is too at like at eight 16 Z and like his companies, uh, but even outside, and I see this with like my angel investment portfolio of companies, um, and just founders I talk to where people are like, wait, Elon can do that with Twitter.I really need to do that with my company. And it's given them the permission to be more aggressive and to kind of get back into the basics of why are we building what we are building? These are our customers, this is our revenue. Why do we have these many employees? What do they all do? And not from a place of like being cynical, but from a place of.I want people to be efficient in doing what they do and how do we [00:34:06] Sriram: make that happen? Yeah. I, I stole this, I think somebody said this on Twitter and I officially, he said, Elon has shifted the overturn window of, uh, the playbook for running a company. Um, which is, I think if you look at Twitter, uh, you know, and by the way, I would say, you know, you know the sort of, the warning that shows up, which is don't try this at home before, which is like, so don't try some of these unless you're er and maybe try your own version of these.But, you know, number one is the idea that you, you can become better not through growth, but by cutting things. You can become better, by demanding more out of yourself and the people who work for you. Uh, you, you can become better by hiring a, you know, a higher bar, sitting a higher bar for the talent that you bring into the company and, uh, that you reach into the company.I think at the heart of it, by the way, uh, you know, it's one of the things I've kinda observed from Elon. His relentless focus on substance, which is every condition is gonna be like, you know, the, the meme about what have you gotten done this week is, it kinda makes sense to everything else, which is like, okay, what are we building?What is the thing? Who's the actual person doing the work? As opposed to the some manager two levels a about aggregating, you know, the reports and then telling you what's being done. There is a relentless focus on substance. And my theory is, by the way, I think maybe some of it comes from Iran's background in, uh, space and Tesla, where at the end of the day, you are bound by the physics of the real world, right?If you get something wrong, right, you can, the rockets won't take off or won't land. That'd be a kalo, right? Like what, what's a, the phrase that they use, uh, rapid unplanned disassembly is the word. Right? Which is like better than saying it went kaboom. Uh, but, you know, so the constraints are if, if, you know, if you get something wrong at a social media company, people can tell if you get something really wrong at space with the Tesla.People can tap, right? Like very dramatically so and so, and I think, so there was a relentless focus on substance, right? Uh, being correct, um, you know, what is actually being done. And I think that's external Twitter too. And I think a lot of other founders I've talked to, uh, uh, in, sometimes in private, I look at this and go, oh, there is no different playbook that they have always I instituted or they were used to when they were growing up.We saw this when we were growing up. They're definitely seen some other cultures around the world where we can now actually do this because we've seen somebody else do this. And they don't have to do the exact same thing, you know, Elon is doing. Uh, they don't have to, uh, but they can do their variations of demanding more of themselves, demanding more of the people that work for them.Um, focusing on substance, focusing on speed. Uh, I think our all core element. [00:36:24] Aarthi: I also think over the last few years, uh, this may be controversial, I don't know why it is, but it somehow is that you can no longer talk about hard work as like a recipe for success. And you know, like growing up for us. When people say that, or like our parents say that, we just like kind of roll our eyes and be like, yeah, sure.Like, we work hard, like we get it. Yeah. But I think over the last couple of years, it just became not cool to say that if you work hard, then you can, there is a shot at like finding success. And I think it's kind of refreshing almost, uh, to have Elon come in and say, we are gonna work really hard. We are gonna be really hardcore about how we build things.And it's, it's very simple. Like you have to put in the hours. There is no kind of shortcut to it. And I think it's, it's nice to bring it all tight, all back to the basics. And, uh, I like that, like, I like the fact that we are now talking about it again and it's, it's sad that now talking about working really hard or having beds in your office, we used to do that at MicrosoftYeah. Uh, is now like suddenly really controversial. And so, um, I'm, I'm all for this. Like, you know, it's not for everyone, but if you are that type of person who really enjoys working hard, really enjoys shipping things and building really good things, Then I think you might find a fit in this culture. And I think that's a good thing.Yeah. I, [00:37:39] Sriram: I think there's nothing remarkable that has been built without people just working really hard. It doesn't happen for years and years, but I think for strong, some short-term burst of some really passionate, motivated, smart people working some really, you know, and hard doesn't mean time. It can mean so many different dimensions, but I don't think anything great gets built without that.So, uh, yeah, it's interesting. We [00:37:59] Aarthi: used to like do overnights at Microsoft. Like we'd just like sleep under our desk, um, until the janitor would just like, poke us out of there like, I really need to vacuum your cubicle. Like, get out of here. And so we would just like find another bed or something and just like, go crash on some couch.But it was, those were like some of our fun days, like, and we look back at it and you're like, we sh we built a lot. I think at some point sh I think when I walked over to his cubicle, he was like looking at Windows Source code and we're like, we are looking at Windows source code. This is the best thing ever.I think, I think there's such joy in like, Finding those moments where you like work hard and you're feeling really good about it. [00:38:36] Sriram: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Um, so you [00:38:37] Next CEO of Twitter?[00:38:37] Dwarkesh: get working hard and bringing talent into the company, uh, let's say Elon and says Tomorrow, you know what, uh, Riam, I'm, uh, I've got these other three companies that I've gotta run and I need some help running this company.And he says, Sriram would you be down to be the next, [00:38:51] Sriram: uh, next CEO of Twitter Absolutely not. Absolutely not. But I am married to someone. No, uh uh, no, uh uh, you know, you know when, uh, I don't think I was, the answer is absolutely not. And you know this exactly. Fun story. Um, uh, I don't think it says in public before. So when you, when I was in the process, you know, talking to and nor words and, you know, it's, it's not like a, uh, it's not like a very linear process.It's kind of a relationship that kind of develops over time. And I met Mark Andreen, uh, multiple times over the years. They've been having this discussion of like, Hey, do you want to come do venture or do you want to, if you wanna do venture, do you wanna come do with us? And um, and, and one of the things Mark would always tell me is, uh, something like, we would love to have you, but you have to scratch the edge of being an operator first.Um, because there are a lot of, there are a lot of ways VCs fail, uh, operator at VCs fail. Um, and I can get, get into some of them if you're interested, but one of the common ways that they fail is they're like, oh, I really want to go back to, um, building companies. And, uh, and now thing is like antis more than most interest, like really respects entrepreneurship, fraud's the hard of what we do.But he will, like, you have to get that out of a system. You have to be like, okay, I'm done with that word. I want to now do this. Uh, before you know, uh, you want to come over, right? And if you say so, let's have this conversation, but if not, we will wait for you. Right. And a woman telling me this all the time, and at some point of time I decided, uh, that, uh, you know, I just love this modoc.Um, you know, there are many things kind of different about being an operator versus a BC uh, and you kind of actually kind of really train myself in what is actually a new profession. But one of the things is like, you know, you kind of have to be more of a coach and more open to like, working with very different kinds of people without having direct agency.And it's always a very different mode of operation, right? And you have to be like, well, I'm not the person doing the thing. I'm not the person getting the glory. I'm here to fund, obviously, but really help support coach be, uh, a lending hand, be a supporting shoulder, whatever the, uh, the metaphor is, or for somebody else doing the thing.And so you kind of have to have the shift in your brain. And I think sometimes when VCs don't work out, the few operator on VCs don't work out. There are few reasons. Uh, number one reason I would say is when an operator, and I, I hate the word operator by the way, right? It just means you have a regular job.Uh, you know, uh, and, uh, but the number one reason is like when you have a regular job, you know, you're an engineer, you're, you're a product manager, you're a marketer, whatever. , you get feedback every single day about how you're doing. If you're an engineer, you're checking in code or you know your manager, you hire a great person, whatever it is.When you're at Visa, you're not getting direct feedback, right? You know, maybe today what I'm doing now, recording this with you is the best thing ever because some amazing fund is gonna meet it and they're gonna come talk to me, or maybe it's a total waste of time and I should be talking some else. You do have no way of knowing.So you really have to think very differently about how you think about patients, how we think about spending your time, and you don't get the dopamine of like, oh, I'm getting this great reinforcement loop. Um, the second part of it is because of that lack of feedback loop, you often don't know how well you're doing.Also, you don't have that fantastic product demo or you're like, you know, if an engineer like, oh, I got this thing working, the builder is working, it's 10 x faster, or this thing actually works, whatever the thing is, you don't get that feedback loop, uh, because that next great company that, you know, the next Larry and Sergey or Brian Armstrong might walk in through your door or Zoom meeting tomorrow or maybe two years from now.So you don't really have a way to know. Um, so you kind of have to be, you have a focus on different ways to do, uh, get. Kind of figured out how well you're doing. The third part of it is, uh, you know, the, uh, the feedback loops are so long where, uh, you know, you, you can't test it. When I was a product manager, you would ship things, something you, if you don't like it, you kill it, you ship something else.At, at our firm in, you invest in somebody, you're working with them for a decade, if not longer, really for life in some ways. So you are making much more intense, but much less frequent decisions as opposed to when you're in a regular job, you're making very frequent, very common decisions, uh, every single day.So, uh, I get a lot of differences and I think, you know, sometimes, uh, you know, folks who, who are like a former CEO or former like VP product, uh, uh, I talk a lot of them sometimes who went from, came to BC and then went back and they either couldn't adapt or didn't like it, or didn't like the emotions of it.And I had to really convince myself that okay. Hopefully wouldn't fate those problems. I probably, maybe some other problems. And, uh, uh, so yes, the long way of saying no, , [00:43:13] Why Don't More Venture Capitalists Become Founders?[00:43:13] Dwarkesh: um, the desk partly answer another question I had, which was, you know, there is obviously this pipeline of people who are founders who become venture capitalists.And it's interesting to me. I would think that the other end or the converse of that would be just as common because if you're, if you're an angel investor or venture capitalist, you've seen all these companies, you've seen dozens of companies go through all these challenges and then you'd be like, oh, I, I understand.[00:43:36] Sriram: Wait, why do you think more VCs driven apart? You have some strong opinions of this . [00:43:40] Dwarkesh: Should more venture capitalists and investors become founders? I think [00:43:43] Aarthi: they should. I don't think they will. Ouch. I dunno, why not? Um, I think, uh, look, I think the world is better with more founders. More people should start companies, more people should be building things.I fundamentally think that's what needs to happen. Like our single biggest need is like, we just don't have enough founders. And we should just all be trying new things, building new projects, all of that. Um, I think for venture capital is, I think what happens, and this is just my take, I don't know if Farram agrees with it, but, um, I think they see so much from different companies.And if you're like really successful with what you do as a vc, you are probably seeing hundreds of companies operate. You're seeing how the sausage is being made in each one of them. Like an operating job. You kind of sort of like have this linear learning experience. You go from one job to the other.Here you kind of sort of see in parallel, like you're probably on like 50, 60 boards. Uh, and oftentimes when it comes to the investor as like an issue, it is usually a bad problem. Um, and you kind of see like you, you know, you kind of see how every company, what the challenges are, and every company probably has like, you know, the best companies we know, I've all had this like near death experience and they've come out of that.That's how the best founders are made. Um, you see all of that and I think at some point you kind of have this fear of like, I don't know. I just don't think I wanna like, bet everything into this one startup. One thing, I think it's very hard to have focus if you've honed your skillset to be much more breath first and go look at like a portfolio of companies being helpful to every one of them.And I see Sure. And do this every day where I, I have no idea how he does it, but key context, which is every 30 minutes. Yeah. And it's crazy. Like I would go completely and say, where if you told me board meeting this founder pitch, oh, sell this operating role for this portfolio company. Second board meeting, third, board meeting founder, pitch founder pitch founder pitch.And that's like, you know, all day, every day nonstop. Um, that's just like, you, you, I don't think you can like, kind of turn your mindset into being like, I'm gonna clear up my calendar and I'm just gonna like work on this one thing. Yeah. And it may be successful, it may not be, but I'm gonna give it my best shot.It's a very, very different psychology. I don't know. What do you [00:45:57] Sriram: think? Well, Well, one of my partners Triess to say like, I don't know what VCs do all day. The job is so easy, uh, uh, you know, they should start complaining. I mean, being a founder is really hard. Um, and I think, you know, there's a part of it where the VCs are like, oh, wait, I see how hard it is.And I'm like, I'm happy to support, but I don't know whether I can go through with it. So, because it's just really hard and which is kind of like why we have like, so much, uh, sort of respect and empathy, uh, for the whole thing, which is, I, [00:46:20] Aarthi: I do like a lot of VCs, the best VCs I know are people who've been operators in the past because they have a lot of empathy for what it takes to go operate.Um, and I've generally connected better with them because you're like, oh, okay, you're a builder. You've built these things, so, you know, kind of thing. Yeah. Um, but I do think a lot more VCs should become [00:46:38] Sriram: founders than, yeah. I, I think it's some of the couple of other things which happened, which is, uh, uh, like Arthur said, like sometimes, uh, you know, when we see you kind of, you see, you kind of start to pattern match, like on.And you sometimes you analyze and, and you kind of, your brain kind of becomes so focused on context switching. And I think when need a founder, you need to kind of just dedicate, you know, everything to just one idea. And it, it's not just bbc sometimes with academics also, where sometimes you are like a person who's supporting multiple different kinds of disciplines and context switching between like various speech students you support.Uh, but it's very different from being in the lab and working on one problem for like long, long years. Right. So, um, and I think it's kind of hard to then context switch back into just doing the exact, you know, just focus on one problem, one mission, day in and day out. So I think that's hard, uh, and uh, but you should be a founder.Yeah, I think, yeah, I think more people should try. [00:47:32] Role of Boards[00:47:32] Dwarkesh: . Speaking of being on boards, uh, what the FTX Saga has raised some questions about what is like the role of a board, even in a startup, uh, stage company, and you guys are on multiple boards, so I'm curious how you think about, there's a range of between micromanaging everything the CEO does to just rubber stamping everything the CEO does.Where, what is the responsibility of a board and a startup? [00:47:54] Aarthi: What, what, what are the, this is something I'm really curious about too. I'm [00:47:57] Sriram: just, well, I just wanna know on the FDX soccer, whether we are gonna beat the FTX episode in interviews in terms of view your podcast, right? Like, so if you folks are listening, right?Like let's get us to number one. So what you YouTube like can subscriber, they're already listening. [00:48:10] Aarthi: What do you mean? Get us [00:48:10] Sriram: to number one? Okay, then, then spread the word, right? Like, uh, don't [00:48:13] Aarthi: watch other episodes. It's kinda what you [00:48:15] Sriram: should, I mean, if there's [00:48:16] Dwarkesh: like some sort of scandal with a 16 Z, we could definitely be to fdx.[00:48:21] Sriram: Uh, uh, yeah, I think it's gonna, well, it's gonna be really hard to read that one. Uh, , uh, uh, for for sure. Uh, uh, oh my goodness. Um, uh, but no, [00:48:29] Aarthi: I'm, I'm genuinely curious about [00:48:31] Sriram: these two. Well, uh, it's a few things, you know, so the multiple schools of thought, I would say, you know, there's one school of thought, which is the, uh, uh, you know, which I don't think I totally subscribe to, but I think some of the other later stages, especially public market folks that I work with sometimes subscribe to, which is the only job of a, uh, board is to hire and fire the ceo.I don't think I really subscribe to that. I think because we deal with more, uh, early stage venture, um, and our job is like, uh, you know, like lot of the companies I work with are in a cdc c, b, you know, they have something working, but they have a lot long way to go. Um, and hopefully this journey, which goes on for many, many years, and I think the best way I thought about it is to, people would say like, you want to be.Wave form dampener, which is, uh, you know, for example, if the company's kind of like soaring, you want to kind of be like kind the check and balance of what? Like, hey, okay, what do we do to, uh, you know, um, uh, to make sure we are covering our bases or dotting the is dotting the, crossing The ts be very kind of like careful about it because the natural gravitational pool of the company is gonna take it like one direct.On the other hand, uh, if the company's not doing very well and everybody's beating us, beating up about it, you're, you know, your cust you're not able to close deals. The press is beating you up. You want to be the person who is supportive to the ceo, who's rallying, everybody helping, you know, convince management to stay, helping convince, close host, hire.So, um, there are a lot of things, other things that go into being a board member. Obviously there's a fiscal responsibility part of things, and, um, you know, um, because you kind of represent so many stakeholders. But I think at the heart of it, I kind of think about, uh, you know, how do I sort of help the founder, uh, the founder and kind of dampen the waveform.Um, the other Pinteresting part was actually the board meetings. Uh, Themselves do. Uh, and I do think like, you know, about once a year or, uh, so like that there's every kind of, there's, there's almost always a point every 18 months or so in a company's lifetime where you have like some very decisive, interesting moment, right?It could be good, it could be bad. And I think those moments can be, uh, really, really pivotal. So I think there's, there's huge value in showing up to board meetings, being really prepared, uh, uh, where you've done your homework, you, you know, you've kind of had all the conversations maybe beforehand. Um, and you're coming into add real value, like nothing kind of annoying me if somebody's just kind of showing up and, you know, they're kind of maybe cheering on the founder once or twice and they kind of go away.So I don't think you can make big difference, but, uh, you know, I think about, okay, how are we sort of like the waveform, the, you know, make sure the company, [00:50:58] Aarthi: but I guess the question then is like, should startups have better corporate governance compared to where we are today? Would that have avoided, like, say the FTX [00:51:08] Sriram: saga?No, I mean, it's, I mean, we, I guess there'll be a legal process and you'll find out right when the FTX case, nobody really knows, you know, like, I mean, like what level of, uh, who knew what, when, and what level of deceptions, you know, deception, uh, uh, you know, unfolded, right? So, uh, it, yeah. Maybe, but you know, it could have been, uh, it could have been very possible that, you know, uh, somebody, somebody just fakes or lies stuff, uh, lies to you in multiple ways.[00:51:36] Aarthi: To,

El 13 de noviembre desaparecen tres chicas de Alcàsser de 14 y 15 años. Alguien las vio subir a un coche blanco. ¿Quién se ha llevado a Toñi, Míriam y Desirée?  (Parte 1 de 2)    Más info en el blog:  https://criminopatia.com/82-alcasser-parte-1/     ¿Quieres más episodios? ¡Hazte fan!   https://criminopatia.com/fans/ 

Míriam Belchior, ex-ministra do Planejamento, explica a importância do Minha Casa, Minha Vida, programa que revolucionou a política de habitação no Brasil. Durante o governo Lula e Dilma foram beneficiadas 10 milhões de brasileiros e brasileiras. Além disso, Míriam comenta os desdobramentos da iniciativa como a geração de empregos no setor de engenharia e na construção civil. Jornal PT Brasil: ao vivo, de segunda a sexta, às 9h. No ar: radio.pt.org.br

Hay dos hitos que conviene tener en mente. El primero, lo veremos en las elecciones municipales y autonómicas previstas para el próximo mes de mayo, porque serán un buen termómetro sobre la reválida o no del Gobierno socialista. El segundo, vendrá con la presidencia rotatoria del Consejo de la Unión Europea durante el segundo semestre de 2023. 

La falta de este debate bloquea cualquier esquema de proyección colectiva en torno a un nuevo modelo de desarrollo que se impone. En Francia, por ejemplo, gana protagonismo la palabra sobriedad. No olvidan que el último gran movimiento social, el de los chalecos amarillos, se originó a partir del impuesto al carbono mal calibrado socialmente.

Com este livro, Míriam vai ajudá-lo a lidar com as birras do seu filho, mas também com as suas, para que não perca a cabeça e seja a mãe ou o pai que merece ser.

¿Te preguntas por dónde puedes empezar a reconectar emocionalmente con tus hijos si llevas mucho tiempo (quizás años) criándolos de forma reactiva (gritos, distanciamiento emocional, amenazas, castigos)? Entonces este episodio es para ti!¿Cómo puedes reestablecer la conexión utilizando la crianza consciente? Míriam Tirado aborda esta pregunta tan importante y más. Míriam es consultora de crianza consciente, escritora y periodista, autora de los libros para adultos “Rabietas”, “Maternidad a flor de piel”, entre otros, y de 8 cuentos, entre los que destacan “El hilo invisible”, “Tengo un volcán” o “El círculo”. Para conocer más sobre Míriam Tirado: https://www.miriamtirado.com/Disfrútalo!

The boys welcome Riam back again to discuss where the top six should be after the winter schedule, who are the frauds of the NBA, and where will the current contenders be come playoff time. TAP IN! [0:00] Premier League Big Six Winter Schedule[1:08:02] Champions League Game 5 Preview (Man City v Juve, Chelsea v Juve)[1:14:35] NBA Roundup (Steph MVP? Nets need Kyrie? Lakers done???)[1:51:22] NFL Contenders and Pretenders Links to all platforms: https://linktr.ee/strictlybanter 

Chuks and Ade welcome Riam back to the show to break down for United above the line and what the next few weeks mean for them. Also, what has the first week of the NBA shown us, and why Aaron Rodgers and Joe Burrow are dominating. TAP IN! [0:00] United v Liverpool fallout [10:01] Looking back at Lampard's tenure at Chelsea? [23:36] Who should be United's next manager? [54:57] EPL Week 10 Preview (Spurs v United, Leicester v Arsenal) [1:05:12] First Week of NBA thoughts? (Lakers, Nets, Bulls, Warriors etc) [1:28:07] Joe Burrow and Aaron Rodgers love Links to all platforms: https://linktr.ee/strictlybanter