Podcasts about sivs

Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: Finding Balance: Siv's Journey from Fear to Confidence Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/no/episode/2025-03-28-22-34-02-no Story Transcript:No: Våren hadde så vidt meldt sin ankomst på den gamle internatskolen.En: Spring had barely announced its arrival at the old boarding school.No: Siv satt alene ved et av de store vinduene i biblioteket.En: Siv sat alone by one of the large windows in the library.No: Lyset sildret inn og dannet mønstre på gulvet.En: The light trickled in and created patterns on the floor.No: Hun følte varmen, men i hjertet var det kaldt av frykt.En: She felt the warmth, but in her heart, it was cold with fear.No: Eksamenene var rett rundt hjørnet, og presset var nesten uutholdelig.En: Exams were just around the corner, and the pressure was almost unbearable.No: Biblioteket var en oase av ro med sine høye, trehyller og en svak lukt av gamle bøker.En: The library was an oasis of calm with its tall wooden shelves and a faint smell of old books.No: Stemmen til en ivrig hvisking hørte til et sted i nærheten, og side etter side ble bladd om i takt med klokken.En: The sound of eager whispering could be heard somewhere nearby, and page after page was turned in time with the clock.No: Dette var Sivs tilfluktssted, men i dag føltes til og med denne tryggheten urolig.En: This was Siv's refuge, but today even this sanctuary felt unsettling.No: Hun dro fingrene over ryggen på en mattebok, men klarte ikke å fokusere.En: She ran her fingers over the spine of a math book but couldn't focus.No: "Mange tanker?En: "Many thoughts?"No: " Magnus satte seg ved siden av henne, med et vennlig smil.En: Magnus sat down next to her with a friendly smile.No: Han var Sivs trofaste venn, alltid der når livet føltes overveldende.En: He was Siv's loyal friend, always there when life felt overwhelming.No: Siv nølte, men hun visste at hun hadde holdt denne frykten for seg selv altfor lenge.En: Siv hesitated, but she knew she had kept this fear to herself for too long.No: "Jeg vet ikke om jeg klarer det, Magnus," betrodde hun ham stille.En: "I don't know if I can do it, Magnus," she confided quietly.No: "Hva hvis jeg ikke består?En: "What if I don't pass?No: Hva hvis jeg skuffer alle?En: What if I disappoint everyone?"No: "Magnus så alvorlig på henne.En: Magnus looked at her seriously.No: "Du trenger ikke være perfekt, Siv.En: "You don't need to be perfect, Siv.No: Vi er her for å lære, ikke bare for å få karakterer.En: We're here to learn, not just to get grades.No: Husk, balanse er viktig," sa han, og la hånden oppmuntrende på hennes.En: Remember, balance is important," he said, placing his hand encouragingly on hers.No: Samme ettermiddag, i stedet for å lukke seg inne, valgte Siv å omgi seg med positiv energi.En: That same afternoon, instead of closing herself off, Siv chose to surround herself with positive energy.No: Ingrid kom til biblioteket med sitt vanlige avslappede vesen.En: Ingrid came to the library with her usual relaxed demeanor.No: "Hei, Siv!En: "Hi, Siv!No: Hvordan går det med puggingen?En: How's the studying going?"No: " spurte hun muntert, og så på Magnus med et lurt smil.En: she asked cheerfully, casting a sly smile at Magnus.No: "Jeg prøver å ta det litt med ro," svarte Siv, og følte med ett lettelse.En: "I'm trying to take it easy," replied Siv, feeling suddenly relieved.No: Ingrid hadde alltid et smittende humør og en evne til å få ting til å virke mindre skremmende.En: Ingrid always had a contagious mood and an ability to make things seem less daunting.No: Hun hadde et særlig talent for å finne glede, selv i utfordrende situasjoner.En: She had a particular talent for finding joy, even in challenging situations.No: Dette var noe Siv beundret.En: This was something Siv admired.No: I løpet av en intens studiesesjon, midt blant stabler av oppgaver og glansede håndbøker, slo angsten til for fullt.En: During an intense study session, amid stacks of assignments and glossy manuals, anxiety struck full force.No: Patetisk og liten kjente Siv seg, fengslet av frykt.En: Siv felt pathetic and small, imprisoned by fear.No: Håndflatene hennes ble klamme, og pusten altfor kort.En: Her palms became clammy, and her breathing too short.No: Magnus og Ingrid var der med en gang.En: Magnus and Ingrid were there immediately.No: Ingrid holdt henne i armene, mens Magnus snakket rolig.En: Ingrid held her in her arms while Magnus spoke calmly.No: "Det er greit å kjenne seg slik, Siv.En: "It's okay to feel like this, Siv.No: Ta et dypt pust.En: Take a deep breath.No: Du trenger ikke være alene om dette.En: You don't have to be alone in this."No: "Denne støtten vekket noe inni Siv.En: This support awakened something inside Siv.No: Hun innså at kampen for perfeksjon var en ensom vei, men hun var ikke alene.En: She realized that the pursuit of perfection was a lonely path, but she was not alone.No: Hun måtte endre seg, og nå visste hun hvordan.En: She needed to change, and now she knew how.No: Da eksamensdagene kom, gikk Siv til prøvelokalene med Magnus og Ingrid ved sin side.En: When exam days came, Siv went to the exam halls with Magnus and Ingrid by her side.No: Hun kjente fortsatt nervene, men nå var det en ny, balansert ro i hjertet hennes.En: She still felt the nerves, but now there was a new, balanced calmness in her heart.No: Hun hadde valgt å se på eksamenene som en del av læringsreisen, ikke som det endelige målet.En: She had chosen to view the exams as part of the learning journey, not the ultimate goal.No: Med støtte fra vennene, en nyvunnen forståelse av balanse, og en dypere selvtillit, gikk Siv trofast inn i framtiden og satte pris på seg selv – ikke bare for prestasjonene, men for at hun hadde vokst, og var villig til å møte livet med åpenhet og varme.En: With support from her friends, a newfound understanding of balance, and a deeper confidence, Siv faithfully stepped into the future and appreciated herself – not just for her achievements, but for the fact that she had grown, and was willing to face life with openness and warmth. Vocabulary Words:barely: så vidtannounce: meldtboarding school: internatskolentrickle: sildretunbearable: uutholdeligoasis: oasecalm: rowhispering: hviskingrefuge: tilfluktsstedhesitate: nølteconfide: betroddedisappoint: skufferencouragingly: oppmuntrendedemeanor: vesencontagious: smittendedaunting: skremmendetalent: talentpathetic: patetiskclammy: klammebreathing: pustenpursuit: kampenperfection: perfeksjonbalanced: balansertconfidence: selvtillitfaithfully: trofastopenness: åpenhetwarmth: varmeachievement: prestasjonappreciate: satte pris påimprisoned: fengslet

Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: Mystery at Aurlandsfjord: The Saga of the Vanished Artifact Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/no/episode/2025-02-09-23-34-02-no Story Transcript:No: I Aurlandsfjord, omfavnet av majestetiske fjell og speilblanke fjorder, lå en liten landsby dekket av snø.En: In the Aurlandsfjord, embraced by majestic mountains and mirror-like fjords, lay a small village covered in snow.No: Siv, en lokal historiker med kjærlighet for de gamle fortellingene, tilbrakte ofte tid i landsbyens museum.En: Siv, a local historian with a love for the old tales, often spent time in the village's museum.No: Det var en kald vinterdag da nyheten spredte seg: en eldgammel artefakt hadde forsvunnet sporløst fra museet.En: It was a cold winter day when the news spread: an ancient artifact had vanished without a trace from the museum.No: Det var ingen spor, ingen spor av tyveri.En: There were no signs, no evidence of theft.No: Ryktene begynte å svirre.En: Rumors began to swirl.No: Noen sa at troll hadde tatt det.En: Some said trolls had taken it.No: Andre mente det var et nissetriks.En: Others believed it was a trick by the pixies.No: Siv kjente disse gamle historiene godt, men visste også hvor viktig artefakten var for landsbyens arv.En: Siv knew these old stories well, but she also knew how important the artifact was to the village's heritage.No: Erik, Sivs barndomsvenn, var ikke like overbevist.En: Erik, Siv's childhood friend, was not as convinced.No: Han trodde ikke på trolldom eller overtro.En: He did not believe in magic or superstition.No: Han visste at folk noen ganger kunne være sly kloke, men Siv visste at hun trengte hans støtte.En: He knew that people could sometimes be cunning, but Siv knew she needed his support.No: "Erik, vi må finne den," sa Siv med fasthet i stemmen, mens de sto ved fjorden dekket av iskrystaller.En: "Erik, we have to find it," said Siv with determination in her voice, as they stood by the fjord covered with ice crystals.No: De eldre i landsbyen snakket om en hule langt unna, hvis inngang var forsvunnet gjennom årene.En: The elders in the village spoke of a cave far away, its entrance lost over the years.No: Siv bestemte seg for å undersøke disse historiene.En: Siv decided to investigate these stories.No: Hun leste gamle dagbøker og notater.En: She read old diaries and notes.No: Snakker med landsbyens eldste, hun samlet hver ledetråd hun kunne få.En: Talking with the village elders, she gathered every clue she could find.No: Erik fulgte motvillig med på hennes undersøkelser.En: Erik reluctantly followed her investigations.No: En natt, midt i en virvlende storm, hørte de et susende drønn fra fjorden.En: One night, amid a swirling storm, they heard a rushing roar from the fjord.No: Strømmen hadde avdekket den gamle hulen.En: The currents had uncovered the old cave.No: Siv og Erik dro ned til vannkanten, der en mystisk lysstråle glødet fra hulens dyp.En: Siv and Erik went down to the water's edge, where a mysterious beam of light glowed from the cave's depths.No: "Inne i hulen!En: "Inside the cave!"No: " hvisket Siv med spenning.En: Siv whispered excitedly.No: Sammen vasset de forsiktig inn.En: Together they cautiously waded in.No: Der, badet i et magisk skjær, var den savnede artefakten.En: There, bathed in a magical aura, was the missing artifact.No: Siv følte en kribling av ærefrykt.En: Siv felt a tingle of awe.No: Erik sto stille, ikke lenger sikker på hva han trodde.En: Erik stood still, no longer sure about what he believed.No: De tok artefakten tilbake til museet.En: They returned the artifact to the museum.No: Selv om Siv ikke kunne bevise overnaturlige elementer, visste hun at historiene betydde noe.En: Although Siv could not prove supernatural elements, she knew that the stories mattered.No: Erik, som nå hadde sett det uforklarlige, nikket til henne med en ny respekt.En: Erik, having now seen the unexplainable, nodded to her with a newfound respect.No: Sivs mot og besluttsomhet hadde betalt seg, og Erik hadde fått en ny tro på at verden kanskje rommet større mysterier enn fisk og fangst.En: Siv's courage and determination had paid off, and Erik had gained a new belief that the world might hold greater mysteries than just fish and catch.No: Vinteren fortsatte, men i Aurlandsfjord var det som om en ny legende nettopp hadde begynt.En: Winter continued, but in Aurlandsfjord, it was as if a new legend had just begun. Vocabulary Words:majestic: majestetiskevillage: landsbyhistorian: historikerartifact: artefaktvanished: forsvunnettrace: sportheft: tyverirumors: rykteneswirl: svirrecunning: slydetermination: fasthetheritage: arvelders: eldstecave: huleinvestigate: undersøkediaries: dagbøkerswirling: virvlenderoar: drønncurrents: strømmenbeam: lysstråleaura: skjærtingle: kriblingawe: ærefryktsupernatural: overnaturligeunexplainable: uforklarligecourage: motdetermination: besluttsomhetmysteries: mysterierlegend: legendeembraced: omfavnet

Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: A Sister's Pursuit for Justice: Christmas in Oslo Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/no/episode/2024-12-12-23-34-02-no Story Transcript:No: Det var en kald vinterdag i Oslo.En: It was a cold winter day in Oslo.No: Snøen dekket gatene, og julelysene blinket overalt.En: Snow covered the streets, and Christmas lights twinkled everywhere.No: Siv sto utenfor politistasjonen.En: Siv stood outside the police station.No: Gule og røde lys formet stjerner i vinduene.En: Yellow and red lights formed stars in the windows.No: Hun tok et dypt pust og gikk inn.En: She took a deep breath and walked in.No: Inne var det kaotisk.En: Inside, it was chaotic.No: Politifolk hastet rundt, travle med de siste oppgavene før jul.En: Police officers hurried around, busy with the last tasks before Christmas.No: Juledekorasjonene ga en rar følelse midt i alt alvoret.En: The Christmas decorations gave an odd feeling amidst all the seriousness.No: Siv kjente kulden fra vinteren henge igjen i luften.En: Siv felt the cold from the winter lingering in the air.No: Hun klemte på mappen i hånden sin.En: She clutched the folder in her hand.No: Det var alt hun hadde som kunne hjelpe Lars.En: It was all she had that could help Lars.No: Lars, Siv sin yngre bror, satt feilaktig anklaget for noe han hadde vært mistenkt for siden forrige jul.En: Lars, Siv's younger brother, was wrongly accused of something he had been suspected of since the previous Christmas.No: Siv visste at hun måtte gjøre noe.En: Siv knew she had to do something.No: Hun kunne ikke la ham tilbringe enda en høytid med dette hengende over seg.En: She couldn't let him spend yet another holiday with this hanging over him.No: "Jeg vil snakke om saken til broren min," sa Siv bestemt til konstablen bak skranken.En: "I want to talk about my brother's case," Siv said firmly to the constable behind the counter.No: En kvinnen så opp, litt irritert, men nikket.En: The woman looked up, slightly irritated, but nodded.No: På kontoret til etterforskeren møtte hun skeptiske blikk.En: In the investigator's office, she met skeptical looks.No: Bevisene var mot Lars, men i hjertet sitt visste Siv at han var uskyldig.En: The evidence was against Lars, but in her heart, Siv knew he was innocent.No: Hun kjente presset fra familien og kommende julefeiringen.En: She felt the pressure from the family and the upcoming Christmas celebration.No: Hun kunne ikke unngå å tenke på den skyldfølelsen som hadde plaget henne siden året før.En: She couldn't help but think about the guilt that had plagued her since the year before.No: I løpet av møtet presset hun frem all informasjonen hun hadde samlet.En: During the meeting, she pressed forward all the information she had gathered.No: Men det var en brikke som manglet.En: But there was a missing piece.No: Kari, en venn av familien, kunne vite mer.En: Kari, a family friend, might know more.No: Kari hadde sett noe – eller kanskje hørt noe.En: Kari had seen something—or perhaps heard something.No: Mot sin egen frykt bestemte Siv seg for å snakke med Kari.En: Against her own fear, Siv decided to talk to Kari.No: Det var ikke uten risiko.En: It wasn't without risk.No: Om Kari ikke ville hjelpe, ville det ikke bare koste Lars friheten, men også Sivs egen sikkerhet.En: If Kari wouldn't help, it would not only cost Lars his freedom but also put Siv's own safety at risk.No: Kari var nølende da de møttes på en kafé i nærheten.En: Kari was hesitant when they met at a café nearby.No: Mens de satt der, med duften av nybakte pepperkaker i luften, begynte Kari å fortelle hva hun hadde sett den kvelden.En: As they sat there, with the scent of freshly baked gingerbread in the air, Kari began to tell what she had seen that evening.No: Siv oppdaget at Kari hadde en avgjørende bevis.En: Siv discovered that Kari had crucial evidence.No: En detalj som ville fri Lars fra beskyldningene.En: A detail that would clear Lars from the accusations.No: Men Kari var redd.En: But Kari was scared.No: Hun ville ikke til politiet.En: She didn't want to go to the police.No: Siv visste at hun måtte overbevise henne.En: Siv knew she had to convince her.No: Med et mykt, men sterkt engasjement, snakket Siv til Kari om hvor viktig sannheten var.En: With a gentle yet strong commitment, Siv spoke to Kari about how important the truth was.No: Hun talte til hennes samvittighet og deres felles kjærlighet til Lars.En: She appealed to her conscience and their shared love for Lars.No: Til slutt, etter lange diskusjoner, sa Kari ja.En: Finally, after long discussions, Kari agreed.No: De dro til politistasjonen sammen.En: They went to the police station together.No: Denne gangen var Siv sterkere.En: This time, Siv was stronger.No: Med Kari ved sin side og det nye beviset i hånden, gikk hun inn på kontoret igjen.En: With Kari by her side and the new evidence in hand, she walked into the office again.No: Etterforskeren, nå mindre skeptisk, leste det nye beviset nøye.En: The investigator, now less skeptical, read the new evidence carefully.No: Dagene før jul var fylt med spenning og usikkerhet.En: The days before Christmas were filled with tension and uncertainty.No: Men endelig, like før julaften, kom beskjeden.En: But finally, just before Christmas Eve, the message came.No: Saken mot Lars var droppet.En: The case against Lars was dropped.No: De hadde funnet den rette personen, takket være Kari.En: They had found the right person, thanks to Kari.No: Siv pustet lettet ut.En: Siv breathed a sigh of relief.No: På julaften satt Lars og Siv sammen med familien.En: On Christmas Eve, Lars and Siv sat together with the family.No: Julemusikken spilte, og treet skinte med alle sine lys.En: Christmas music played, and the tree shone with all its lights.No: Siv hadde lært en viktig ting.En: Siv had learned an important thing.No: Hun så på Lars og smilte.En: She looked at Lars and smiled.No: Familie betydde alt, spesielt i julens magiske tid.En: Family meant everything, especially in the magical time of Christmas. Vocabulary Words:chaotic: kaotiskclutched: klemteaccused: anklagetconstable: konstabelskeptical: skeptiskeevidence: bevisinnocent: uskyldigplagued: plagetcommitment: engasjementconscience: samvittighetlingering: henge igjensuspected: mistenktfirmly: bestemtcost: kostehesitant: nølendescent: duftengingerbread: pepperkakercrucial: avgjørendefreedom: frihetenpressure: pressetaccusations: beskyldningeneappealed: taltegathered: samletconvince: overbevisedropped: droppetrelief: lettet utcommitment: engasjementtension: spenninguncertainty: usikkerhetcelebration: feiringen

In the first hour of "Connections with Evan Dawson" on Friday, September 20, 2024, we discuss Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance's recent comments about SIVs(Special Immigrant Visas) and the reality of bringing Afghan workers who served the U.S. military to the United States.

Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: Roots of Love: A New Beginning in Siv's Garden Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.org/roots-of-love-a-new-beginning-in-sivs-garden Story Transcript:Nb: Siv gikk langs de rolige gatene i sitt gamle nabolag.En: Siv walked along the quiet streets of her old neighborhood.Nb: Fuglene sang, og det var lukten av nyklippet gress i luften.En: Birds were singing, and the air smelled of freshly cut grass.Nb: Hun kjente en blanding av nostalgi og sorg.En: She felt a mix of nostalgia and sorrow.Nb: Etter et vondt brudd ønsket hun å finne fred og starte på nytt.En: After a painful breakup, she wanted to find peace and start anew.Nb: Henrik sto i parken, bøyd over en plante.En: Henrik stood in the park, bent over a plant.Nb: Han elsket jobben sin som landskapsarkitekt.En: He loved his job as a landscape architect.Nb: Det var noe spesielt med å bringe naturens skjønnhet til menneskers daglige liv.En: There was something special about bringing nature's beauty into people's daily lives.Nb: Han så Siv for første gang da hun gikk forbi.En: He saw Siv for the first time as she walked by.Nb: "Hun ser ut som hun trenger en venn," tenkte Henrik.En: "She looks like she needs a friend," Henrik thought.Nb: Han bestemte seg for å si hei.En: He decided to say hello.Nb: "Hei! Jeg heter Henrik. Jeg bor her i nabolaget. Hva med deg?"En: "Hi! My name is Henrik. I live here in the neighborhood. What about you?"Nb: Siv smilte forsiktig.En: Siv smiled cautiously.Nb: "Hei, jeg heter Siv. Jeg har nettopp flyttet tilbake hit. Jeg bodde her som barn."En: "Hi, I'm Siv. I've just moved back here. I lived here as a child."Nb: De pratet litt sammen.En: They chatted a bit.Nb: Henrik fortalte om sitt arbeid og sin kjærlighet til naturen.En: Henrik talked about his work and his love for nature.Nb: Siv lyttet, men holdt seg tilbake.En: Siv listened but held back.Nb: Hun følte seg fortsatt sårbar etter sitt siste forhold.En: She still felt vulnerable after her last relationship.Nb: Men Henrik hadde en ro over seg som var tiltalende.En: But Henrik had a calm presence that was appealing.Nb: "Vi har en sommerbegivenhet her i parken neste uke," sa Henrik.En: "We have a summer event here in the park next week," said Henrik.Nb: "Vil du komme? Det blir veldig gøy."En: "Would you like to come? It will be a lot of fun."Nb: Siv følte seg litt nervøs, men også nysgjerrig.En: Siv felt a bit nervous but also curious.Nb: Hun nikket forsiktig.En: She nodded gently.Nb: "Ja, kanskje. Vi får se."En: "Yes, maybe. We'll see."Nb: Uken gikk, og Siv merket at hun gledet seg til begivenheten.En: The week went by, and Siv found herself looking forward to the event.Nb: På dagen for arrangementet var det varmt og solfylt.En: On the day of the event, it was warm and sunny.Nb: Mange mennesker hadde samlet seg i parken.En: Many people had gathered in the park.Nb: Barn løp rundt, og det var latter og liv overalt.En: Children were running around, and there was laughter and life everywhere.Nb: Henrik dukket opp med et smil.En: Henrik appeared with a smile.Nb: "Jeg har en overraskelse for deg," sa han og ledet henne til et stille hjørne av parken.En: "I have a surprise for you," he said, leading her to a quiet corner of the park.Nb: Der, mellom blomstrende busker og grønne planter, var et spesielt hageområde.En: There, between blooming bushes and green plants, was a special garden area.Nb: Et skilt sto der med ordene: "Sivs hage - Et sted for ny begynnelse."En: A sign read: "Siv's Garden - A Place for New Beginnings."Nb: Siv ble rørt.En: Siv was touched.Nb: Tårene fylte øynene hennes.En: Tears filled her eyes.Nb: "Dette er for meg?" spurte hun lavt.En: "This is for me?" she asked softly.Nb: Henrik nikket.En: Henrik nodded.Nb: "Ja, jeg ville vise deg at jeg bryr meg.En: "Yes, I wanted to show you that I care.Nb: Jeg ønsker å bygge noe vakkert sammen, om du er villig til å ta sjansen."En: I want to build something beautiful together, if you're willing to take the chance."Nb: Sivs hjerte banket raskt.En: Siv's heart beat quickly.Nb: Hun følte både frykt og håp.En: She felt both fear and hope.Nb: "Jeg tror jeg er klar til å prøve," sa hun til slutt.En: "I think I'm ready to try," she said finally.Nb: De begynte sakte å tilbringe mer tid sammen.En: They slowly began to spend more time together.Nb: Henrik viste henne små gester av omsorg hver dag – en kopp kaffe, en tur i den frodige parken, en blomst fra hagen.En: Henrik showed her small gestures of care every day – a cup of coffee, a walk in the lush park, a flower from the garden.Nb: Siv begynte å åpne seg litt etter litt.En: Siv started to open up little by little.Nb: En kveld satt de på en benk og så på solnedgangen.En: One evening, they sat on a bench watching the sunset.Nb: Henrik's hånd fant veien til hennes.En: Henrik's hand found its way to hers.Nb: "Jeg har funnet det jeg lette etter," sa han stille.En: "I've found what I was looking for," he said quietly.Nb: Siv lente hodet mot hans skulder.En: Siv leaned her head on his shoulder.Nb: "Jeg også," svarte hun.En: "Me too," she replied.Nb: Der, i den stille forstaden, i sommerens varme omfavnelse, startet deres nye kapittel.En: There, in the quiet suburb, in the warm embrace of summer, their new chapter began.Nb: En historie om tillit, kjærlighet og vakre hager.En: A story of trust, love, and beautiful gardens. Vocabulary Words:quiet: roligenostalgia: nostalgisorrow: sorgbreakup: bruddpeace: fredplant: plantelandscape architect: landskapsarkitektchat: pratetvulnerable: sårbarpresence: roappealing: tiltalendesummer event: sommerbegivenhetcurious: nysgjerriggathered: samletlaughter: lattersurprise: overraskelseblooming bushes: blomstrende buskernew beginnings: ny begynnelsetouched: rørtfear: frykthope: håpgestures: gesterlush: frodigegarden: hagebench: benksunset: solnedgangenembrace: omfavnelsetrust: tillitlove: kjærlighetbeautiful: vakre

On this episode of the Happy Hour, Michael, Anna and Anthony dive deep into the recent case heard by the Supreme Court revolving around Mifepristone and the FDA's 20-year-old approval of the widely-used abortion drug. Spoiler, the Justices seem likely to uphold the federal approval but it's not without its controversies. The gang also covers the latest goings on in Congress like Mike Gallagher stepping down, bipartisan support for the SNAP program and what to do about the backlog of SIVs (special visas) for out Afghan partners who helped the US Military in our prolonged middle-east wars.

Välkomna till den andra delen av Eva Maria och Sivs läknings berättelser. Om du inte redan lyssnat på första delen där vi pratar mest om hypopressiv träning och hur viktig träningen var för deras läkning, så gör det! I det här avsnittet pratar vi om helhetstänkande när det kommer till läkning av bäckenbotten. Vi pratar om vikten av ens förhållningssätt när man läker bäckenbotten OCH inte minst om det återkommande temat här i Vi har knipit klart: att lyssna på kroppen. Som ni kanske minns är Eva Maria, 33 år gammal och kände problem i bäckenbotten efter en förlossning. Trots att hon fick höra att hon aldrig mer skulle kunna leva som tidigare, hittade Eva Maria till mitt 12-veckorsprogram för bäckenbottenhälsa. Idag lyfter hon 90 kg i marklyft och springer Göteborgsvarvet.Och inspirerande Siv, 70 år gammal som bara blev erbjuden operation men hittade istället MoonRise vilket ledde till att hon blev HELT symptomfri. Ålder är inte ett hinder för läkning! Det här är den andra delen av Eva Maria och Sivs läkningsresor. Hoppas de kan inspirera dig idag! Hypopressiv träningskurs: https://moonrise.health/sv/hypopressiv/ 12 veckors program: https://moonrise.health/solutions/pelvic-health-program/

Idag får ni träffa två kvinnor som läkt sina bäckenbottnar med MoonRise och Filippa. Eva Maria är 33 år och upplevde problem efter att hon födde sitt första barn för några år sedan. Hon kände tyngdkänsla, skav och kunde inte lyfta sin bebis. Hon blev meddelad att hon aldrig mer skulle kunna träna som tidigare. Eva Maria hittade till MoonRise 12 veckors Pelvic health program och idag lyfter hon 90 kg i marklyft och springer Göteborsvarvet. Sen har vi Siv, 70 år, som upplevde de första framfallssymptomen i 40-årsåldern. Det enda hon erbjöds från vården var operation, men hon visste att det inte var rätt väg då både hennes mamma och mormor gått den vägen utan framgång. Hon testade många saker som gjorde att det blev lite bättre, men det var inte förrän i sena 60 års åldern som hon hittade MoonRise och hypopressiv träning och blev HELT symptomfri. Det här är den första delen av Eva Maria och Sivs läkningsresor. Välkomna till en stund av insikt, uppmuntran och framtidshopp! Hypopressiv träningskurs https://moonrise.health/sv/hypopressiv/ Pelvic health program https://moonrise.health/solutions/pelvic-health-program/

Three news stories summarized & contextualized by analytic journalist Colin Wright.Japan becomes the fifth nation to land a spacecraft on the MoonSummary: Last Friday, Japan became only the fifth country to successfully soft-land on the Moon when its Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, or SLIM mission touched down within its target area, livestreaming the landing on YouTube.Context: Japan's space agency, JAXA, announced that the craft's solar array wasn't operating as it should soon after landing, so its battery drained in a matter of hours, but the mission is still considered to be a success as even crashing something into the Moon is a big deal, but safely landing within an intended target area, and then sending photos home of the surface of the Moon is even more remarkable to the point that it's been accomplished only 22 times by four countries (the US, USSR, China, and India) since the first successful landing in 1959, leading up to this Japanese mission.—Ars TechnicaOne Sentence News is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Billions of cicadas will buzz this spring as two broods emerge at the same timeSummary: Two broods of periodical cicadas, which spend the majority of their life underground before popping up to the surface every 13 or 17 years, depending on their brood's cycle, will emerge at the same time this year, blanketing the eastern portion of the United States in what look like giant crickets and their loud mating sounds.Context: The last time the emergence of these two broods lined up in this way was in 1803, and the degree to which even just one brood can carpet the landscape with harmless but omnipresent and loud and crunchy cicadas and their cast-off exoskeletons cannot be overstated—they tend to upend local ecosystems and can disrupt sleep cycles, make driving more dangerous, and generally dominate the visual and audible landscape in the areas where they're most prevalent; the afflicted regions will begin to see these two waves of cicadas when the ground temperature reaches something like 64 degrees Fahrenheit (or about 18 degrees Celsius), and that typically happens sometime late-April to mid-May, depending on which part of the country we're looking at.—NPR NewsAustralia's 'golden visa' scheme for wealthy investors axedSummary: A scheme that allowed wealthy overseas investors to attain an Australian visa if they invested more than $5 million Australian dollars (or around $3.3 million US dollars) in the country has been halted, the government saying it led to poor economic outcomes.Context: This program, which issued so-called “significant investor visas” or SIVs to folks with money who the Australian government hoped would then invest more of their resources in the country, apparently did not lead to more investment, and critics have long contended that these golden visas mostly served to help corrupt officials park illicit funds in Australia at the expense of more deserving people who might otherwise be welcomed into the country; the government will now pivot its resources toward attracting skilled workers, reserving more visas for them and fewer for the sorts of people who might have previously used this program for its money laundering potential and various wealth-hiding loopholes.—BBC NewsThe share of employees in the US who are working from home at least some of the time is way down from its pandemic-era peak, but it's also way up from the 3% of people who worked from home before COVID-19 upended everything.—Axios53%Percentage of inflation in the second and third quarters of 2023 that resulted from corporations raising prices, rather than broader economic variables.In other words: corporations saw an opportunity to raise their profits (when people already assumed inflation was high, so they could justify those price-increases more easily, pocketing the difference) and that “greedflation” has led to a windfall for consumer-facing companies, but smaller bank accounts for those who buy their products (and damage to the economies in which they all operate).—The GuardianTrust Click Get full access to One Sentence News at onesentencenews.substack.com/subscribe

Vil Erna Solbergs norgesmesterskap i «Jeg snakker ut» redde hennes politiske liv? Og hvilket løfte krever Siv at Høyres Kent Ranum holder? Hør ukas Omadressert med Roy Tommy Bråten, Siv Sandvik og Terje Eidsvåg. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hvilke egenskaper mener Siv Jensen er viktig for en finansminister i krisetid? Og på hvilken måte klarer man å skille fag og politikk i arbeid med Statsbudsjettet? Lytt til samtalen mellom: Terje Strøm, sjeføkonom og grunnlegger av NyAnalyse, og styremedlem av PF Samfunnsøkonomi Siv Jensen, tidligere finansminister og partileder for Fremskrittspartiet I denne episoden hører du om Sivs erfaringer fra finansministerstolen, og hvordan det føles å ikke lenger ha det enorme ansvaret i politikken. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Regjeringen har ropt ulv, ulv flere måneder før statsbudsjettet ble kjent. Også kutta dem ikke mer. Nå vet ikke Omadresserts Roy Tommy Bråten, Siv Sandvik og Terje Eidsvåg helt hva de skal tro. Og endelig ble en litteraturpris gitt til noen folk flest har lest. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Politisk redaktør Siv Sandvik er ikke nådig når Durek Verrets virksomhet kommer på banen. Og Trondheim Høyre skaper overskrifter igjen - og igjen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, I review the documentary "Send Me." The documentary looks at the last days in Afghanistan, as U.S. veterans and NGO's worked to get American citizens, SIVs, green card holders, and more out of the country before the final withdrawal.Also: I talk about the fire that hit my home, as well as the ensuing broken hand (these show notes are hard to type), the Biden student loan repayment scheme, and Podcast Movement apologized for Ben Shapiro showing up.Watch "Send Me" on Amazon https://watch.amazon.com/watch?asin=B0B8Q68LGLBecome a patron! sign up at www.patreon.com/tylermorganshow for access to bonus content and more!Watch live on Twitch!Support the show by donating or buying merch at www.relentlessdaring.comBuy me a cup of coffee! www.ko-fi.com/tylermorganshow Venmo me @RDMP84Follow me on social mediaTwitter @FakeTylerMorganFacebook @RelentlessDaringParler @RelentlessDaringInstagram @RelentlessDaring  Email tyler@relentlessdaring.comAd music and intro music used with permission from Purple Planet www.purple-planet.com  Get bonus content on Patreon Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

For de som i perioder er litt ekstra sårbare, kan det være veldig intenst å forholde seg til den virtuelle virkeligheten. I denne episoden møter vi «Siv» for å fortelle om hennes bipolare ferie på Instagram. Av: Kjersti Kanestrøm Lie I sommer publiserer vi nye episoder hver tirsdag og torsdag. Hør episoden i appen NRK Radio

In 2008, a few obscure three-letter financial products—MBS, ABS, CDOs and SIVs—set off the biggest financial crisis in history.Now, could a new alphabet soup of DAOs, NFTs, Dapps, DMMs and DEXes pose similar risks to financial stability?Yes, says Hilary Allen, our guest on the latest New Money Review podcast. Allen is a professor at the American University Washington College of Law, where she teaches financial regulation.The latest acronyms—for decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralised applications, market makers and exchanges (Dapps, DMMs and DEXes)—all come from the decentralised finance (“DeFi”) market.DeFi is a $210bn market of financial services built on top of cryptocurrency networks like ethereum. DeFi activities parallel those undertaken in the traditional financial system, such as trading, lending and investing—but without banks, central trading platforms or investment firms.The sector includes a number of automated lending protocols, such as Aave, bZx v2, Compound, Maker, Polygon Aave and Venus. It also contains automated market making protocols, such as Uniswap, Curve, and Balancer, and automated investment vehicles, such as Yearn and Convex.But according to Allen, DeFi increasingly resembles the ‘shadow banking' sector that triggered the 2008 meltdown—and very few people are paying attention. Allen says that three key risks in DeFi—heightened leverage, rigidity, and the potential for investor runs—are the same as those that grew out of control fifteen years ago.“What has really struck me the most,” Allen says in the podcast, “is how quickly we forget.”

This week, A'ndre and Ryan speak with Russ Travers, former Deputy Homeland Security Advisor to President Biden, about the Afghanistan withdrawal, the Special Immigrant Visa program, and future counterterrorism challenges. Russ, who also served as Acting Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, provides his take on the nature of the terror threat today, and how we have to think through the evolution of terrorism today. We also discuss the national security community's "whole of government deficit" -- highlighting how we can address emerging threats that transcend responsibilities of multiple agencies within the government. We then turn to Afghanistan, where Russ responds to criticisms levied against the Biden Administration's handling of the situation, stating that there "were no good options," and why even though he initially supported staying in he acknowledges the dangers of a maintained troop presence there. We spend time discussing the Special Immigrant Visa program with Russ, a program he oversaw as it pertained to the Afghan evacuation, and how resettlement has proceeded. The conversation closes out with Russ' thoughts on greatest future threats -- particularly threats from within.

At Maren Grøthe (20) fra Hølonda skulle bli tidenes yngste på Stortinget var det ingen som så komme for noen år siden. Nå forteller hun hvorfor det ble slik, om å synge nasjonalsangen med kongen, makta hun har, og om det å snart bli tv-stjerne. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Jennifer Brandl is the Associate Director of Clinical Operations at Kezar Life Sciences. She has 15 years of experience as a researcher and clinical operations specialist, and she is currently pursuing a Master's degree in Data Science from the University of Wisconsin.Jennifer credits her prior experience at a smaller biotech company with giving her a critical foundation in clinical conduct and study execution. At Kezar, she leverages this expertise and her passion for research to support the company's development of pioneering therapies and to change the lives of patients.Episode HighlightsThe elements of Jennifer's expertise that have especially helped her drive success in the trials she managesThe benefits of functional service provider outsourcing modelsHow Kezar's patient-centric nature had the company well prepared to navigate the COVID-19 pandemicThe greatest challenges Jennifer and Kezar experienced due to the pandemic, and some positive outcomesImportant considerations for organizations exploring home health optionsHow communication and relationship-building form the foundation of clinical trial workThe challenges and benefits she's experienced conducting site initiation visits virtuallyHow best to prepare before updating or transforming site initiation processesWhat she believes is next for decentralized clinical trialsHow automation and tech adoption can help extract more insight from dataResources:Kezar Life SciencesJennifer Brandl on LinkedInConversations in Clinical Trial Readiness Interview Series

If your knee jerk reaction to every dip in the market is to sell, this episode of The Yield has some advice that you need to hear.  Join Peter Kerr, CFA, and Michael Ehrlich for a discussion about the resulting changes caused by innovation within financial markets. Michael is an Associate Professor of Finance at New Jersey Institute of Technology and focuses on financial markets and  institutions with an emphasis on market failures. He has written about the consequences of financial market innovation and is Associate Director of the Leir Center for Financial Bubble Research. In this discussion they examine the opportunities of a loose monetary policy backdrop as well as the risks that are bubbling under the surface. Key Takeaways:[2:00] Michael highlights his journey of academic entrepreneurship and his involvement in cutting edge trading moves. [6:48] The definition, consequences and risks of arbitration. [11:06] Current innovations have the potential to present risk to today's financial market. [17:10] The mistakes that led to the fall of Long Term Management Capital. [19:35] Common reactions that inexperienced investors have to unexpected dips in the market. [21:40] Some of the risks that are bubbling up now, and how investors should think about them.[26:09] A more strategic approach to weathering the next market downturn. [31:40] Common mistakes that are unique to retail investors. [34:08] The impact that the news should have (or not have) on your perception of risk. [37:05] It's not a bad thing to take a risk- when you know you're taking a risk. [39:20] The structural inefficiencies of ETFs, SIVs and other financial innovations during periods of market stress. [47:52] Michael's take on how to approach the market with long and short views. Mentioned in This Episode:Yieldstreet

The war in Afghanistan is over. In this episode, we document how and why the Biden administration finally admitted defeat in our 20 year attempt to create a new government in Afghanistan and we take a hard look at the lessons we need to learn. Afghanistan is a country in a far away land, but there are disturbing similarities between the Afghanistan government that just collapsed and our own. We'd be wise not to ignore them. Executive Producer: Rachel Passer Executive Producer: Anonymous  Please Support Congressional Dish – Quick Links Contribute monthly or a lump sum via PayPal Support Congressional Dish via Patreon (donations per episode) Send Zelle payments to: Donation@congressionaldish.com Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or Donation@congressionaldish.com Use your bank's online bill pay function to mail contributions to: 5753 Hwy 85 North, Number 4576, Crestview, FL 32536. Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media! Background Sources Recommended Congressional Dish Episodes CD236: January 6: The Capitol Riot CD218: Minerals are the New Oil CD210: The Afghanistan War CD124: The Costs of For-Profit War How We Got Here Craig Whitlock. The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War. Simon and Schuster, 2021. Patrick Tucker. August 18, 2021. “Trump's Pledge to Exit Afghanistan Was a Ruse, His Final SecDef Says.” Defense One. Eugene Kiely and Robert Farley. August 17, 2021. “Timeline of U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan.” FactCheck.org. Eric Schmitt and Jennifer Steinhauer. July 30, 2021. “Afghan Visa Applicants Arrive in U.S. After Years of Waiting.” The New York Times. Craig Whitlock, Leslie Shapiro and Armand Emamdjomeh. December 9, 2019. “The Afghanistan Papers: A secret history of the war.” The Washington Post. Mark Landler and James Risen. July 25, 2017. “Trump Finds Reason for the U.S. to Remain in Afghanistan: Minerals.” The New York Times. John F. Harris. October 15, 2001. “Bush Rejects Taliban Offer On Bin Laden ” Washington Post. The Evacuation: Those Left Behind William Mauldin. September 2, 2021. “Afghanistan Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Staff Left Behind.” Wall Street Journal. Zolan Kanno-Youngs and Annie Karni. August 29, 2021. “Series of U.S. Actions Left Afghan Allies Frantic, Stranded and Eager to Get Out.” The York Times. Sami Sadat. August 25, 2021. “I Commanded Afghan Troops This Year. We Were Betrayed.” The New York Times. Marjorie Censer. August 18, 2021. “US contractors rush to get former employees out of Afghanistan.” Defense News. Siobhan Hughes. August 18, 2021. “Afghanistan Veterans in Congress Trying to Prevent ‘a Death Warrant' for Helping America.” Wall Street Journal. Alex Sanz and Tammy Webber. August 18, 2021. “US friends try to rescue brother in arms in Afghanistan.” AP News. Seth Moulton. June 04, 2021. "Moulton, Bipartisan Honoring Our Promises Working Group to White House: Evacuate our Afghan Partners.” Contractors in Afghanistan Matt Taibbi. August 18, 2021. “We Failed Afghanistan, Not the Other Way Around.” TK News by Matt Taibbi on Substack. Jack Detsch. August 16, 2021. “Departure of Private Contractors Was a Turning Point in Afghan Military's Collapse.” Foreign Policy. Matt Stoller. July 15, 2021. “‘A Real S*** Show': Soldiers Angrily Speak Out about Being Blocked from Repairing Equipment by Contractors.” BIG by Matt Stoller. Lynzy Billing. May 12, 2021. “The U.S. Is Leaving Afghanistan? Tell That to the Contractors.” New York Magazine. Oren Liebermann. March 29, 2021. “Pentagon could open itself to costly litigation from contractors if US pulls out of Afghanistan this year.” CNN. Lucas Kunce and Elle Ekman. September 15, 2019. “Comment Submitted by Major Lucas Kunce and Captain Elle Ekman.” [Regulations.gov(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulations.gov). Aaron Mehta. Oct 25, 2016. “30 Years: William Perry — Reshaping the Industry.” Defense News. Jared Serbu. August 22, 2016. “DoD now awarding more than half its contract spending without competitive bids.” Federal News Network. 41 U.S. Code § 3307 - Preference for commercial products and commercial services. Money: Lost and Gained David Moore. August 23, 2021. “Lawmakers Benefit From Booming Defense Stocks.” Sludge. Lee Fang. August 20, 2021. “Congressman Seeking to Relaunch Afghan War Made Millions in Defense Contracting.” The Intercept. Anna Massoglia and Julia Forrest. August 20, 2021. “Defense contractors spent big in Afghanistan before the U.S. left and the Taliban took control.” OpenSecrets.org. Stephen Losey. April 16, 2021. “The Bill for the Afghanistan War Is $2.26 Trillion, and Still Rising.” Military.com. Eli Clifton. February 16, 2021. “Weapons Biz Bankrolls Experts Pushing to Keep U.S. Troops in Afghanistan.” Daily Beast. Open Secrets. 2021. Defense: Lobbying, 2021. Open Secrets. 2021. Defense: Money to Congress. Laws S.1790 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 Sponsor: Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK) Status: Became Public Law No: 116-92 on December 20, 2019 H.R. 3237: Emergency Security Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 Sponsor: Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) Status: Signed into law, 2021 May 20 House Vote Breakdown Congressional Budget Office Score Law Outline TITLE IV: BILATERAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE GENERAL PROVISIONS EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF THE AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA PROGRAM Sec. 401: Amends the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 to expand eligibility to include Afghans who worked not only for the US Government for more than 1 year but also our allies as an off-base interpreter or if they performed "activities for United States military stationed at International Security Assistance Force (or any successor name for such Force). Increases the number of Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) to Afghan partners by 8,000, for a total of 34,500 allocated since December 19, 2014. Sec. 402: Authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security and Secretary of state to jointly waive for 1 year (maximum 2 years with an extension) the requirement that Afghan partners eligible for SIVs get a medical exam before they can receive their visa. The Secretary of Homeland Security has to create a process to make sure Afghan SIV holders get a medical exam within 30 days of entry into the United States. Sec. 403: Allows the surviving spouse or child or employee of the United States Government abroad to be eligible for immigration into the United States if the employee worked for our government for at least 15 years or was killed in the line of duty. It also expands entry permissions for Afghan SIV applicants in addition to those who have already been approved. This is retroactive to June 30, 2021. Policies for Visa Processing: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Policy Manual, Chapter 9: Certain Afghan Nationals U.S Department of State -- Bureau of Consular Affairs. “Special Immigrant Visas for Afghans - Who Were Employed by/on Behalf of the U.S. Government.” Audio Sources Gen. Mark Milley: "There was nothing that I or anyone else saw that indicated a collapse of this army and this government in 11 days." August 18, 2021 General Mark Milley: The time frame of rapid collapse that was widely estimated and ranged from weeks to months, and even years following our departure, there was nothing that I or anyone else saw that indicated a collapse of this army and this government in 11 days. Central Command submitted a variety of plans that were briefed and approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense and the President. These plans were coordinated, synchronized and rehearsed to deal with these various scenarios. One of those contingencies is what we are executing right now. As I said before, there's plenty of time to do AARs(After Action Reviews) and key lessons learned and to delve into these questions with great detail. But right now is not that time. Right now, we have to focus on this mission, because we have soldiers at risk. And we also have American citizens and Afghans who supported us for 20 years also at risk. This is personal and we're going to get them out. President Biden on Afghanistan Withdrawal Transcript July 8, 2021 Sound Clips 01:30 President Biden: When I announced our drawdown in April, I said we would be out by September, and we're on track to meet that target. Our military mission in Afghanistan will conclude on August 31. The drawdown is proceeding in a secure and orderly way, prioritizing the safety of our troops as they depart 3:40 President Biden: Together with our NATO allies and partners, we have trained and equipped nearly 300,000 current serving members of the military, the Afghan national security force, and many beyond that are no longer serving. Add to that hundreds of thousands more Afghan national defense and security forces trained over the last two decades. 04:04 President Biden: We provided our Afghan partners with all the tools, let me emphasize, all the tools -- training, equipment -- of any modern military. We provided advanced weaponry, and we're going to continue to provide funding and equipment and we'll ensure they have the capacity to maintain their Air Force. 5:54 President Biden: We're also going to continue to make sure that we take on Afghan nationals who worked side by side with US forces, including interpreters and translators. Since we're no longer going to have military there after this, we're not going to need them and they'll have no jobs. We're [sic] also going to be vital to our efforts. they've been very vital, and so their families are not exposed to danger as well. We've already dramatically accelerated the procedure time for Special Immigrant Visas to bring them to the United States. Since I was inaugurated on January 20, we've already approved 2,500 Special Immigrant Visas to come to the United States. Up to now, fewer than half have exercised the right to do that. Half have gotten on aircraft and come commercial flights and come and other half believe they want to stay, at least thus far. We're working closely with Congress to change the authorization legislation so that we can streamline the process of approving those visas. And those who have stood up for the operation to physically relocate 1000s of Afghans and their families before the US military mission concludes so that, if they choose, they can wait safely outside of Afghanistan, while their US visas are being processed. 8:13 President Biden: For those who have argued that we should stay just six more months, or just one more year, I asked them to consider the lessons of recent history. In 2011, the NATO allies and partners agreed that we would end our combat mission in 2014. In 2014, some argued one more year. So we kept fighting. We kept taking casualties. In 2015, the same, and on and on. Nearly 20 years of experience has shown us that the current security situation only confirms that just one more year of fighting in Afghanistan is not a solution, but a recipe for being there indefinitely. It's up to the Afghans to make the decision about the future of their country. Others are more direct. Their argument is that we should stay with the Afghans and Afghanistan indefinitely. In doing so they point to the fact that we we have not taken losses in this last year. So they claim that the cost of just maintaining the status quo is minimal. 9:19 President Biden: But that ignores the reality, and the facts that already presented on the ground in Afghanistan when I took office. The Taliban is at its strongest militarily since 2001. The number of US forces in Afghanistan had been reduced to a bare minimum. And the United States and the last administration made an agreement that they have to with the Taliban remove all our forces by May 1 of this year. That's what I inherited. That agreement was the reason the Taliban had ceased major attacks against US forces. 9:55 President Biden: If in April, I had instead announced that the United States was going to go back on that agreement, made by the last administration, the United States and allied forces will remain in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future, the Taliban would have again begun to target our forces. The status quo was not an option. Staying would have meant US troops taking casualties, American men and women back in the middle of a civil war, and we would run the risk of having to send more troops back in Afghanistan to defend our remaining troops. Once that agreement with the Taliban had been made, staying with a bare minimum force was no longer possible. 10:34 President Biden: So let me ask those who want us to stay: how many more? How many 1000s more Americans' daughters and sons are you willing to risk? How long would you have them stay? Already we have members of our military whose parents fought in Afghanistan 20 years ago. Would you send their children and their grandchildren as well? Would you send your own son or daughter? After 20 years, a trillion dollars spent training and equipping hundreds of 1000s of Afghan National Security and Defence Forces. 2,448 Americans killed, 20,722 more wounded, and untold 1000s coming home with unseen trauma to their mental health. I will not send another generation of Americans to war in Afghanistan with no reasonable expectation of achieving a different outcome. 11:51 President Biden: Today the terrorist threat has metastasized beyond Afghanistan. So, we are repositioning our resources and adapting our counterterrorism posture to meet the threats where they are now: significantly higher in South Asia, the Middle East and Africa. 12:07 President Biden: But make no mistake, our military and intelligence leaders are confident they have the capabilities to protect the homeland and our interests from any resurgent terrorist challenge emerging or emanating from Afghanistan. We're developing a counterterrorism over-the-horizon capability that will allow us to keep our eyes firmly fixed at any direct threat to the United States in the region and act quickly and decisively if needed. 12:38 President Biden: We also need to focus on shoring up America's core strengths to meet the strategic competition competition with China and other nations that is really going to determine our future. 14:58 Reporter: Is the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan now inevitable? President Biden: No. It is not. Because you have the Afghan troops, 300,000. Well equipped, as well equipped as any army in the world, and an air force against something like 75,000 Taliban. It is not inevitable. 15:45 President Biden: Do I trust the Taliban? No, but I trust the capacity of the Afghan military who is better trained, better equipped, and more competent in terms of conducting war. 18:07 Reporter: Your own intelligence community has assessed that the Afghan government will likely collapse President Biden: That is not true 18:53 President Biden: And I want to make clear what I made clear to Ghani, that we are not going to walk away and not sustain their ability to maintain that force. We are. We're going to also work to make sure we help them in terms of everything from food necessities and other things in the region. But there is not a conclusion that in fact, they cannot defeat the Taliban. I believe the only way there's going to be -- this is now Joe Biden, not the intelligence community -- the only way there's only going to be peace and secure in Afghanistan, is that they work out a modus vivendi with the Taliban, and they make a judgement as to how they can make peace. And the likelihood there's going to be one unified government in Afghanistan, controlling the whole country is highly unlikely. 21:30 Reporter: Mr. President, how serious was the corruption among the Afghanistan government to this mission failing there? President Biden: First of all, the mission hasn't failed yet. 22:00 President Biden: There were going to be negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan national security forces, and the Afghan government that didn't come to fruition. So the question now is where do they go from here? The jury is still out, but the likelihood there's going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely. 23:20 Reporter: Mr. President, "speed is safety," as you just said in your remarks. Are you satisfied with the timeline of relocating Afghan nationals? Is it happening quickly enough to your satisfaction if it may not happen until next month at the end? President Biden: It has already happened, there have already been people, about 1000 people have gotten on aircraft and come to the United States already on commercial aircraft. So as I said, there's over 2500 people, that as from January to now, have have gotten those visas and only half decided that they wanted to leave. The point is that I think the whole process has to be speeded up -- period -- in terms of being able to get these visas. Reporter: Why can't the US evacuate these Afghan translators to the United States to await their visa processing as some immigrants of the southern border have been allowed to? President Biden: Because the law doesn't allow that to happen. And that's why we're asking the Congress to consider changing the law. President Biden Remarks on Afghanistan Strategy Transcript April 14, 2021 Sound Clips 00:38 President Biden: I'm speaking to you today from the Roosevelt -- the Treaty room in the White House -- the same spot where in October of 2001, President George W. Bush informed our nation that the United States military had begun strikes on terrorist training camps in Afghanistan. It was just weeks, just weeks after the terrorist attack on our nation that killed 2,977 innocent souls, that turned Lower Manhattan into a disaster area, destroyed parts of the Pentagon and made hallowed ground in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and sparked an American promise that we would never forget. We went to Afghanistan in 2001, to root out al Qaeda to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States planned from Afghanistan. Our objective was clear, the cause was just, our NATO allies and partners rallied beside us. And I supported that military action along with the overwhelming majority of the members of Congress. More than seven years later, in 2008 weeks before we swore the oath of office -- President Obama and I were about to swear -- President Obama asked me to travel to Afghanistan and report back on the state of the war in Afghanistan. I flew to Afghanistan to the Kunar Valley, a rugged, mountainous region on the border of Pakistan. What I saw on that trip reinforced my conviction that only the Afghans have the right and responsibility to lead their country. And that more and endless American military force could not create or sustain a durable Afghan Government. I believed that our presence in Afghanistan should be focused on the reason we went in the first place: to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again. We did that, we accomplished that objective. I said, along with others, we would follow Osama bin Laden to the gates of hell if need be. That's exactly what we did. And we got him. It took us close to 10 years to put President Obama's commitment into form. And that's exactly what happened Osama bin Laden was gone. That was 10 years ago. Think about that. We delivered justice to Bin Laden a decade ago. And we've stayed in Afghanistan for a decade since. Since then, our reasons for remaining in Afghanistan have become increasingly unclear, even as the terrorist threat that we went to fight evolved. Over the past 20 years, the threat has become more dispersed, metastasizing around the globe. Al Shabaab in Somalia, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, on Al Nusra in Syria, ISIS attempting to create a caliphate in Syria and Iraq and establishing affiliates in multiple countries in Africa and Asia. With the terror threat now in many places, keeping 1000s of troops grounded and concentrated in just one country at a cost of billions each year makes little sense to me and our leaders. We cannot continue the cycle of extending or expanding our military presence in Afghanistan, hoping to create ideal conditions for the withdraw and expecting a different result. I'm now the fourth United States President to preside over American troop presence in Afghanistan: two Republicans, two Democrats. I will not pass this responsibility on to a fifth. After consulting closely with our allies and partners, with our military leaders and intelligence personnel, with our diplomats and our development experts, with the Congress and the Vice President, as well as with Mr. Ghani and many others around the world. I concluded that it's time to end America's longest war. It's time for American troops to come home. 5:01 President Biden: When I came to office, I inherited a diplomatic agreement, duly negotiated between the government of the United States and the Taliban, that all US forces would be out of Afghanistan by May 1 2021, just three months after my inauguration. That's what we inherited. That commitment is perhaps not what I would have negotiated myself, but it was an agreement made by the United States government. And that means something. So in keeping with that agreement, and with our national interest, the United States will begin our final withdrawal beginning on May 1 of this year. 8:11 President Biden: You all know that less than 1% of Americans serve in our Armed Forces. The remaining 99%, we owe them. We owe them. They've never backed down from a single mission that we've asked of them. I've witnessed their bravery firsthand during my visits to Afghanistan. They've never wavered in their resolve. They paid a tremendous price on our behalf and they have the thanks of a grateful nation. The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) High-Risk List Center for Strategic and International Studies Transcript March 10, 2021 Speaker: John Sopko - Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction Sound Clips 7:40 John Sopko: But right now, that state is under threat. In the wake of the February 2020 withdrawal agreement, all is not well. Compromise appears in short supply on either side. Taliban attacks have actually increased since the agreement was signed. Assassination of prominent officials, activists, journalists, aid workers and others have also increased, including an unsuccessful attack on one of the female members of the peace negotiating team. And the Taliban offensive on Kandahar city last October, as peace negotiations were ongoing, may well have succeeded, were it not for U.S. air support. Peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban have achieved little for Afghanistan so far, and only time will tell as to whether the new Biden administration initiative will bear fruit. And the Afghan people's fears for its own government survival are exacerbated by the knowledge of how dependent their country is on foreign military and financial support. 12:56 John Sopko: Another equally serious threat to Afghanistan's stability has also largely been ignored as we focus on the boots on the ground in Afghanistan. And that is the provision of last year's U.S.-Taliban agreement that stipulates that in addition to the departure of U.S. and coalition troops, or non-diplomatic civilian personnel: private security contractors, trainers, advisors, and supporting service personnel also must leave the country by May 1. Should this come to passSIGAR and many others believe this may be more devastating to the effectiveness of the Afghan security forces than the withdrawal of our remaining troops. Why is that? Because the Afghan government relies heavily on these foreign contractors and trainers to function. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 there are over 18,000 Defense Department contractors in Afghanistan, including 6000 Americans, and 7,000 3rd country nationals, 40% of whom are responsible for logistics, maintenance, or training tasks. Now, it is well known that the Afghan security forces need these contractors to maintain their equipment, manage supply chains, and train their military and police to operate the advanced equipment that we have purchased for them. For example, as of December, the Afghan National Army was completing just under 20% of its own maintenance work orders, well below the goal of 80% that was set and the 51% that they did in 2018. So that's actually going down. The Afghan National Police were just as bad if not worse, undertaking only 12% of their own maintenance work against a target of 35% and less than the 16% that we reported in our 2019 high risk list. Additionally, and more troubling. The Department of Defense does train, advise and assist command air, or commonly called TAC air recently reported that since late 2019, they have reduced their personnel in Afghanistan by 94%, and that the military drawdown now requires near total use of contract support to maintain the Afghan Air fleet. They assess that quote “further drawdown in the associated closure basis will effectively end all in country aviation training contracts in Afghanistan.” Again, why is this significant? Why do we view this as a high risk? Namely because contractors currently provide 100% of the maintenance for the Afghan Air Force, UAE 60 helicopters and CE 130 cargo aircraft and a significant portion of Afghans Light Combat Support aircraft. TAC air this January gave a bleak assessment, namely, that no Afghan airframe can be sustained as combat effective for more than a few months in the absence of contractor support. 17:51 John Sopko: Continued funding for U.S. reconstruction programs aimed at promoting economic development, rule of law, respect for human rights, good governance and security for the Afghan people may be more significant, because it may be the primary lever left for the US and other donors to influence that country. It appears that even the Taliban understand Afghanistan's dire need for foreign assistance. Because, as one of the few commitments that the US had to make last year was, “to seek economic cooperation for reconstruction, with the new post settlement, Afghan Islamic government.” Now how much the donor community wishes to stay involved will of course depend on what that government looks like and how it behaves. Numerous officials, including then Secretary of State Pompeo and Ambassador Halley, have stated that the US will be able to advance its human rights goals, including the rights of women and girls with the Taliban by leveraging or conditioning this much needed financial assistance. But unfortunately, as SIGAR has long reported, even when conditionality involved only dealing with the Afghan government, donors do not have a stellar record of successfully utilizing that conditionality to influence Afghan behavior. 27:19 John Sopko: Today our report suggests the donor community should realize the Afghan government is focused on a single goal, its survival. Afghanistan is more dependent on international support than ever before. It may not be an overstatement that if foreign assistance is withdrawn and peace negotiations fail, Taliban forces could be at the gates of Kabul in short order. Hearing: A PATHWAY FOR PEACE IN AFGHANISTAN: EXAMINING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AFGHANISTAN STUDY GROUP House Committee on Oversight and Reform: Subcommittee on National Security February 19, 2021 Testimony was heard from the following Afghanistan Study Group officials: Kelly A. Ayotte, Co-Chair; News Corp Board of Directors since April 2017 BAE Systems Board of Directors since June 2017 Blackstone Board of Directors Boston Properties Board of Directors Caterpillar Board of Directors Board of Advisors at Cirtronics General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. (Retired), Co-Chair Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Obama and Trump presidencies. Lockheed Martin Board of Directors since February 2020 Nancy Lindborg, Co-Chair President and CEO of the David Lucile Packard Foundation Former President and CEO of the US Institute for Peace Former Assistant Administrator for the bureau for democracy conflict and humanitarian assistance at USAID During the mid-Obama years. Sound Clips 3:13 Rep. Stephen Lynch (MA): I'd also like to take a moment to thank the nonpartisan US Institute of Peace for the support and expertise they provided to the study group during the course of its work. 3:23 Rep. Stephen Lynch (MA): In the fiscal year 2020 omnibus bill Congress led by Senator Graham Senator Patrick Leahy and the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee of state foreign ops and related programs. They tasked the independent and bipartisan Afghanistan study group to quote, consider the implications of a peace settlement or the failure to reach a settlement on US policy, resources and commitments in Afghanistan. After nearly nine months of review and consultation with current and former US and Afghan government officials, allies and partners and other key stakeholders, the Afghanistan study group issued its final report earlier this month. 15:12 Kelly Ayotte: We recommend that US troops remain beyond may 1. We believe a precipitous withdrawal of US and international troops in May, would be catastrophic for Afghanistan, leading to civil war, and allow the reconstitution of terror groups which threaten the United States within an 18 to 36 month period. 15:41 Kelly Ayotte: Let me be clear, although we recommend that our troops remain beyond may 1, we propose a new approach toward Afghanistan, which aligns our policies, practices and messaging across the United States government to support the Afghan peace process, rather than prosecute a war. Our troops would remain not to fight a forever war, but to guarantee the conditions for a successful peace process and to protect our national security interests to ensure that Afghanistan does not become a haven again, for terrorists who threaten the United States of America. 37:15 General Joseph F. Dunford: Do we need to increase forces if the Taliban don't accept an extension past the first of May, and if they then would re initiate attacks against US forces? and Chairman, we heard exactly what you heard. In the fall. What we were told by commanders on the ground in the department of fence was that 4500 US forces, in addition to the NATO forces that are there was the minimum level to address both the mission as well as protection of our forces in the context of the conditions that existed in the fall in as you've highlighted, those conditions have only gotten worse since the fall so in in our judgment 2500 would not be adequate. Should the Taliban re initiate attacks against the United States Hearing: Examining the Trump Administration's Afghanistan Strategy House Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on National Security January 28, 2020 Witness: John Sopko - Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) Sound Clips 48:54 John Sopko: We've almost created a system that forces people in the government to give happy talk success stories because they're over there on very short rotations. They want to show success. The whole system is almost geared to give you, and it goes up the chain of command, all the way to the President sometimes. He gets bad information from people out in the field because somebody on a nine month rotation, he has to show success, and that goes up. 54:24 John Sopko: Maybe incentivize honesty. And one of the proposals I gave at that time,be cause I was asked by the staff to come up with proposals, is put the same requirement on the government that we impose on publicly traded corporations. Publicly traded corporations have to tell the truth. Otherwise the SEC will indict the people involved. They have to report when there's a significant event. So put that onus, call it The Truth in Government Act if you want, that you in the administration are duty bound by statute to alert Congress to significant events that could directly negatively impact a program or process. So incentivize honesty. 1:10:25 John Sopko: Over 70% of the Afghan budget comes from the United States and the donors. If that money ended, I have said before and I will stand by it, then the Afghan government will probably collapse. Wartime Contracting Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs September 21, 2011 Witnesses: Charles Tiefer: Commissioner on the Commission on Wartime Contracting Clark Kent Ervin: Commissioner on the Commission on Wartime Contracting Sound Clips 1:11:30 Charles Tiefer: Our private security in Afghanistan appears to be a major source of payoffs to the Taliban. Our report has the first official statement that it's the second-largest source of money for the Taliban. Sen. Carl Levin: After drugs. Charles Tiefer: After drugs, that's right. 1:25:18 Clark Kent Ervin: It's critical that the government have a choice, and that means that there needs to be at least a small and expandable, organic capacity on the part of these three agencies to perform missions themselves, so the next time there's a contingency, the government has a choice between going with contractors and going in-house and the determination can be made whether it's more effective to do it either way, whether it's cheaper to do it either way. As we said at the inception, right now the government doesn't have an option. Contractors are the default option because they're the only option. President George W. Bush announces U.S. Military Strikes on Afghanistan October 7, 2001 President George W. Bush: Good afternoon. On my orders, the United States military has begun strikes against Al-Qaeda terrorist training camps and military installations of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. These carefully targeted actions are designed to disrupt the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations and to attack the military capability of the Taliban regime. More than two weeks ago, I gave Taliban leaders a series of clear and specific demands: close terrorist training camps, hand over leaders of the Al-Qaeda network, and return all foreign nationals including American citizens unjustly detained in your country. None of these demands were met and now the Taliban will pay a price by destroying camps and disrupting communications. We will make it more difficult for the terror network to train new recruits and coordinate their evil plans. ** International Campaign Against Terrorism Senate Foreign Relations Committee October 25, 2001 Witness: Colin Powell: Secretary of State Sound Clip 27:00 Colin Powell: Our work in Afghanistan though, is not just of a military nature. We recognize that when the Al Qaeda organization has been destroyed in Afghanistan, and as we continue to try to destroy it in all the nations in which it exists around the world, and when the Taliban regime has gone to its final reward, we need to put in place a new government in Afghanistan, one that represents all the people of Afghanistan and one that is not dominated by any single powerful neighbor, but instead is dominated by the will of the people of Afghanistan. Executive Producer Recommendations Elect Stephanie Gallardo 2022 Krystal Kyle and Friends. August 21, 2021. “Episode 35 Audio with Matthew Hoh.” Cover Art Design by Only Child Imaginations Music Presented in This Episode Intro & Exit: Tired of Being Lied To by David Ippolito (found on Music Alley by mevio)

Americans engaged in the rescue of U.S. citizens, SIVs and green card holders left behind by President Biden in Afghanistan are horrified by what they describe as inexplicable delays from the State Department that are preventing evacuation flights from leaving the country. The State Department's delays are recklessly endangering American lives, three different individuals involved in the private evacuation effort told Fox News. Rick Clay, who runs the private rescue group PlanB, told Fox News that the State Department is the only thing preventing the flights he's organizing from leaving Afghanistan.This episode is also available as a blog post: http://globalreportage.org/2021/09/11/organizers-of-private-rescue-flights-blocked-from-leaving-afghanistan-by-state-department-say-blood-is-on-their-hands/ --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/global-reportage/support

The U.S. military mission in Afghanistan ended Aug 31 with 123,000 evacuations, including 6,000 American citizens and tens of thousands of at-risk Afghans. But not everyone got out. Refugee settlement organizations in Connecticut expect to receive more than 700 Afghan refugees this year. The University of Bridgeport and Goodwin University announced plans to open up dorms to the newly arrived immigrants, and also offer English lessons. A Congressional aide to U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) told WWL that the senator's office “has worked on over 100 cases for Connecticut residents who have reached out to the office regarding family members who remain in Afghanistan. These cases often involve multiple family members, some of whom served as interpreters for the U.S. government.” According to Patrick Malone, spokesman for Congressman Jim Himes (D-Connecticut): “We've flagged 702 individuals' situations for the Department of State. This includes American citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, SIVs, P1s, P2s, and otherwise at-risk Afghans -- 270 of those 702 individuals have some Connecticut connection.” Today on Where We Live, we look into the ongoing efforts to extricate and resettle Afghan refugees in Connecticut, and hear from Afghan-Americans whose families are in danger half a world away. GUESTS:  Aaron Sarwar - Connecticut Air National Guard, and Owner, Hartford City FC Anonymous -Aaron Sarwar's family member, Afghanistan Ann O'Brien - Director of Community Engagement, Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services (IRIS) Camila Vallejo - Housing Reporter, WNPR Martine Dherte - Refugee Services Program Manager, Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants (CIRI) Maryam Wardak - Second Generation Afghan-American in Connecticut Support the show: http://wnpr.org/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The U.S. military mission in Afghanistan ended Aug 31 with 123,000 evacuations, including 6,000 American citizens and tens of thousands of at-risk Afghans. But not everyone got out. Refugee settlement organizations in Connecticut expect to receive more than 700 Afghan refugees this year. The University of Bridgeport and Goodwin University announced plans to open up dorms to the newly arrived immigrants, and also offer English lessons. A Congressional aide to U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) told WWL that the senator's office “has worked on over 100 cases for Connecticut residents who have reached out to the office regarding family members who remain in Afghanistan. These cases often involve multiple family members, some of whom served as interpreters for the U.S. government.” According to Patrick Malone, spokesman for Congressman Jim Himes (D-Connecticut): “We've flagged 702 individuals' situations for the Department of State. This includes American citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, SIVs, P1s, P2s, and otherwise at-risk Afghans -- 270 of those 702 individuals have some Connecticut connection.” Today on Where We Live, we look into the ongoing efforts to extricate and resettle Afghan refugees in Connecticut, and hear from Afghan-Americans whose families are in danger half a world away. GUESTS:  Aaron Sarwar - Connecticut Air National Guard, and Owner, Hartford City FC Anonymous -Aaron Sarwar's family member, Afghanistan Ann O'Brien - Director of Community Engagement, Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services (IRIS) Camila Vallejo - Housing Reporter, WNPR Martine Dherte - Refugee Services Program Manager, Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants (CIRI) Maryam Wardak - Second Generation Afghan-American in Connecticut Support the show: http://wnpr.org/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Howie talks this hour about number of people taken out of Afghanistan compared to the number of Americans and SIVs leaves a lot of extras. Who are these people and How will they be vetted?

Hemtjänsten kan bli 84-åriga Sivs död. Sveriges favoritskriminolog Leif GW Persson aktuell med ny TV-serie. Så tar du hand om din torra hud. Rönnbär är både nyttigt och gott, tipsar Markiz Tainton. Skådespelaren Johan Ulvesson är P4 Extra - Gästen. Ansvarig utgivare: Sofia Taavitsanien.

We are within the final week to fully withdraw from Afghanistan by the August 31 deadline. However, there is information that hasn't been shared by the Biden administration. What are the contingency plans if Americans and Afghans with SIVs don't get out in time? Why are we negotiating with the Taliban? Why are we in this position? Where is our military might?

In this week's episode of the Walk Humbly Podcast: Fallout from the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan, and how Catholic Charities is helping refugees All about “A Catechesis on the Human Person and Gender Ideology” Responding to the deadly earthquake in Haiti Remembering lessons learned from 9/11

READ THAT TITLE. DEAD    LINE.TO MY VETERAN AND MILITARY BROTHERS AND SISTERS, NO ONE DED IN VAIN, AND WE WILL AVENGE THE DEATHS OF THOSE LEFT BEHIND.

For Jalil, a 37-year-old father of three, the urgency to leave Afghanistan has been there ever since he began receiving death threats from the Taliban for his work with the US Special Forces.And, he has known other Afghans who have been murdered by the Taliban for the same work he once did.Jalil, who asked to use his first name only, for security purposes, was an interpreter with the US Army Special Forces for nearly a decade.Related: US biometric devices are in the hands of the Taliban. They could be used to target Afghans who helped coalition forces.Ever since the US entered Afghanistan, it has hired thousands of Afghan interpreters. The Taliban have called them traitors who must be punished. And many have. Since 2014, at least 300 Afghan interpreters or their relatives have been killed. Now, as the Taliban have taken over the country, many of these Afghans fear being left behind.The long wait for a visaFor nearly two years, Jalil has been waiting for a visa, known as a Special Immigrant Visa, or SIV, for himself, his wife and his children. The SIV program was created by Congress to allow local allies in Iraq and Afghanistan, who are threatened by groups like the Taliban, to resettle in the US.Just recently, Jalil's visa was approved and US officials told him to head to the Kabul airport for an Aug. 17 flight. But then, last weekend, with the Taliban's quick takeover of Kabul, and the exit of Afghanistan's now-former president, Ashraf Ghani (he is currently in the United Arab Emirates), chaos ensued at the airport with thousands trying to leave the country.Jalil said that a US official informed him that the seat on his flight had been canceled.“They said they'll plan another flight for me,” Jalil said.Later, he said that he received a message from the US State Department saying that he would be allowed into the airport.Related: 'If journalists leave a scene, it becomes a black hole,' VOA journalist in Kabul saysWith despair setting in, Jalil and his family left their home together at predawn on Wednesday for the Kabul airport, joining thousands of other Afghans hoping to board an evacuation flight. The family spent hours with crowds near the airport, a scene that grew chaotic and led US troops to fire tear gas. But they couldn't make it through.  Jalil and his family have had their bags packed for weeks now, ready to board an evacuation flight from Kabul, Afghanistan.   Credit: Courtesy of Jalil Eventually, Jalil and his family decided to return home but were intersected along the way by Taliban fighters. Jalil said he was beaten with a cable wire while holding his youngest son. He now awaits a chance to make another try for the airport, his gateway to safety.'I'll do anything for him'Afghans like Jalil had fallen down the priority list, behind US citizens and legal permanent residents.Meanwhile, stories are circulating of the Taliban raiding the homes of people who had supported the US, and of beating suspected traitors.That's why, when Jalil saw that Taliban control in Kabul was imminent, he immediately went into hiding.“I had to leave my house and send my wife and kids to my in-law's house to be safe there,” he said.He traveled to another relative's house and kept watch on her rooftop. Jalil is an expert lookout.On the rare occasion Jalil goes outside, he ditches his usual clothes.“I normally wear cargo pants, jeans, with T-shirts,” he said.Now, he dons more traditional Afghan clothing — loose pants, a vest and sandals — to blend in.Related: Taliban takeover could mean more security challenges for Chinese projects in PakistanDave Smyth, a former US Army Special Forces major who lives in Pinehurst, North Carolina, deployed multiple times to Afghanistan and worked alongside Jalil.He said he is well aware of the dangers that Jalil faces and has stepped up his efforts to make sure he won't be left behind.“I'll do anything for him,” Smyth said. “He gave up so much and was so brave fighting side by side with me and my team. He's a teammate.”Dave Smyth, a former Special Forces Major who lives in Pinehurst, North Carolina“He gave up so much and was so brave fighting side by side with me and my team. He's a teammate.”Smyth is trying to remain optimistic, hoping that the US-led mass evacuation plan will continue. But he is also angry and disappointed that the US has ignored warnings for years that the slow processing of SIVs could risk lives.“It's sad that we weren't able to do this faster. It's sad that we gave up so many bases that we could have launched from,” he said.US officials say they are doing their best to evacuate as many people from Afghanistan as they can, including US citizens and Afghan allies. In recent weeks, about 2,000 Afghan SIV applicants have been flown out of the country, a sharp increase from previous months.But the relatively recent stepped-up effort has only accounted for a slice of the estimated 85,000 visa applicants and their families hoping to leave.Related: An Afghan American scholar describes his fear-filled journey from the chaos at Kabul airport to a plane bound for home in the US“It is our intention to bring to the United States as many SIV applicants as we possibly can,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told reporters this week. ‘In desperate need of security and protection'That Jalil waited nearly two years for his visa is not unusual — despite the fact that the State Department, which oversees the SIV program, is required to complete the visa process within nine months. In practice, it can take far longer than that, spanning years. There are several reasons why, ranging from staff shortages and a lack of coordination among government agencies to a complex, 14-step process.Groups like the New York-based International Refugee Assistance Project have sued the US government over the waits, arguing that the visa system is failing to serve people in Afghanistan who served with US forces and face real danger.Some SIV applicants have managed to get on planes this week. Yet, many worry that the window to get out will close, especially if the Taliban decide to block Afghans from leaving.Julie Kornfeld is a senior staff attorney at the International Refugee Assistance Project, which helps Afghans seeking visas. She is concerned about Afghans at risk in Kabul and in remote provinces, where the Taliban can rule away from the media spotlight. Getting to the capital, where evacuations are underway, requires traveling long stretches of highway controlled by Taliban checkpoints.“There are hundreds of thousands of Afghans that live outside of Kabul and that are in desperate need of protection and security,” Kornfeld said.One of the Afghan SIV clients she worked with, she said, did figure out a way to Kabul. He rented a taxi ambulance, betting that might thwart a diligent search by the Taliban if they were stopped. They also had good cover.“His wife is currently 35 weeks pregnant, and they hid all the documents in his wife's clothes.”Julie Kornfeld, senior staff attorney, International Refugee Assistance Project“His wife is currently 35 weeks pregnant, and they hid all the documents in his wife's clothes,” Kornfeld said.In Kabul, Jalil is desperate for good news. But he is also a dad and has been trying to keep his little kids calm, playing hide-and-seek while continuing to seek out an exit plan.The family is also running out of cash. Just before the Taliban takeover, Jalil was a security guard at the Finnish Embassy. Now, the Embassy has closed and its staff has evacuated.He is seeing Taliban fighters in pick-ups outside his window, “patrolling everywhere, on the rangers, motorcycles, carrying weapons.”Taliban leaders say people like Jalil won't face reprisals. They promise protection. Jalil does not believe it.“We cannot trust anybody,” he said.  

Omadressert er tilbake etter feriedvalen, og det er nok av saker å ta tak i en måned før valget. Blant annet spennende målinger, som gir svake ordspill. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The United States is quickly approaching its September deadline for a full military withdrawal from Afghanistan. As the U.S. completes its withdrawal, many Afghans who partnered with the U.S., serving as translators and interpreters, face the danger of severe retribution from the Taliban.Those who partner with the U.S. military can obtain a special immigrant visa, or SIV, through the U.S. State Department, but many lawmakers and veterans' groups are concerned that the U.S. is running out of time to approve SIVs for its Afghan partners. To help make sense of it all, Bryce Klehm sat down with Congressman Seth Moulton and Matt Zeller. Rep. Moulton is a representative from Massachusetts who served as a Marine infantry officer in Iraq and who is also a member of the Honoring Our Promises Working Group, a bipartisan group of lawmakers calling on the Biden administration to protect the U.S.'s Afghan partners. Zeller is a Truman Center fellow and host of the Wartime Allies podcast, who served as a combat advisor with Afghan security forces and who is also the co-founder of No One Left Behind, a veterans' organization that provides services to former Afghan and Iraqi interpreters who resettle in the United States.They covered a range of issues, including the risks that current and former U.S. partners in Afghanistan face, the obstacles in the SIV process and a potential evacuation of U.S. partners to Guam. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Siv Jensen står ved et skikkelig veiskille i livet. Hun er ferdig som FrP-leder, og skal nå finne en ny retning i livet. Journalist Kjersti og psykolog Ragnhild oppsummerer Sivs liv frem til nå, og forsøker å spå hvordan livet hennes har blitt når hun er 80 år. For hva skal man egentlig finne på når man er ferdig som politiker? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kjærlighet ved første blikk og en smertefull Melodi Grand Prix-erfaring! Ukas gjest og nyslått teatersjef Mads Bones holder ikke igjen i denne episoden av Omadressert. Bones, programleder Roy Tommy Bråten, kulturkommentator Terje Eidsvåg og politisk redaktør Siv Sandvik er også innom alkoholkonsumet blant skuespillere, nyheter som bidrar til whiplash – og om å være modig når det trengs. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Adopsjon er denne ukens tema og en viktig brikke i vårt, Maria og Sivs, identitetspuslespill. Med oss har vi artist og sanger Makeda Dyhre og eventplanlegger og student Alexander Kumle, som begge er adoptert fra henholdsvis Ethiopia og Columbia. Vi snakker om hvordan det er å navigerer en norsk hverdag med vår dobbeltarv. Denne episoden vil du ikke gå glipp av.

Avsnitt 4- Vi lockar ut enstöringen Stina Ekblad ur sin loge och bjuder in till ett samtal om att inte gå med strömmen och priset hon betalar för att inte tillhöra flocken. Vi dyker ned i Stinas självbiografiska bok; "Här brusar strömmen förbi" och plockar upp skärvor ur hennes liv. Där träffar vi hennes feminina pappa och hennes maskulina mamma och vreden som måste tyglas. En vardaglig händelse, ett möte på bussen med en kvinna och ett rött äpple, blir en livsavgörande insikt att inte fösas in i fållan-utan att bli en fri kvinna. Vi planerar en logefest för att fira kompisen Sivs och Stinas 50-årig vänskap, "the summer of love", spelar Cream och ser fram emot att få möta Stinas inre hippie. Häng med, vi har som tur var filmrättigheterna till detta fantastiska liv. Det här avsnittet vill ni inte missa. (Foto: Göran Segeholm, från boken "Här brusar strömmen förbi, Weyler förlag) Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

ET AFSNIT FOR OG FRA KVINDER. Svinger du humørmæssigt? Har du dage med fuld energi og dage med tung krop? Det lyder da meget rigtigt lige umiddelbart - men i den her episode bliver vi informerede om, hvad der reelt foregår- og hvordan vi bedst bruger os selv i forskellige faser af måneden. Måne - måned. Siv Gry Gramstrup er sygeplejerske, sundhedshedsplejerske og nu selvstændig med fokus på cyklus-bevidsthed. Dette perspektiv minder os om, at vi er nødt til at tillade og indrette forskellige dage, som cykliske væsener. Det er faktisk ret stort - som Siv skriver: "Ved at lære om din cyklus og det den fortæller dig, vil du opleve et liv med mere glæde, nydelse og at turde og kunne være hele DIG." Sivs budskab er også et opgør med en mandsdomineret arbejdskultur, hvor der hver dag forventes det samme af en person. Vi taler om: - Følelsessving - Behovet for indadvendthed og grænsesætning - Indre sæsoner - Balance mellem stærkt drive og hvile - Kvindens blødning - Brug af p-piller, spiral, andre hormon præparater - Kvindens menopause  - Tamponreklamer  - Gaven i at følge det, man hormonelt er sat op til Lyt med, da også til teaseren lige her: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko0QG-JgcSo Lyt endelig med - du vil blive overrasket over hvor interessant det er - i hvert fald hvis du, ligesom jeg, normalt har mere gang i livets store spørgsmål, fremfor det der foregår lige under navlen... og som farver selve udsynet. LINKS: SIV: https://www.instagram.com/sivgry/?hl=en www.sivgry.dk Mannah: www.mannahguldager.com   PS sidste gang vi gennemgik cyklussen for knap to år siden var det sammen med Thilde Vesterby - Den finder du her:   https://lydenafetbedreliv.libsyn.com/132-frugtbar-thilde-vesterby-fertilitet-ufrivilligt-barnls-mental-frstehjlp-der-bevarer-din-forstand PPS Siv anbefaler appen FLO eller CLUE eller Period tracker

A structured investment vehicle is a pool of investment assets that attempts to profit from credit spreads between short-term debt and long-term structured finance products such as asset-backed securities.A structured investment vehicle is a type of special-purpose fund that borrows for the short-term by issuing commercial paper, in order to invest in long-term assets with credit ratings between AAA and BBB. Long-term assets frequently include structured finance products such as Mortgage-Backed Securities, Asset-Backed Securities, and the less risky tranches of Collateralized Debt Obligations.Funding for SIVs comes from the issuance of commercial paper that is continuously renewed or rolled over; the proceeds are then invested in longer maturity assets that have less liquidity but pay higher yields. The SIV earns profits on the spread between incoming cash flows (principal and interest payments on ABS) and the high-rated commercial paper that it issues.

This week's episode is a call to action, as we tell the story of Muhammad Kamran. I hope that you will listen and join us to help save him and his family. Muhammad was an interpreter in Afghanistan for U.S. troops and the War on Terror for over ten years, but, now, he's been in hiding for six years in Pakistan after he and his family fled Afghanistan for their lives. They are still trying to find safe passage to America. Yet, the U.S. has denied his case repeatedly, with no reasons given publicly.  After the U.S. troops began pulling out of Afghanistan, interpreters became targets for the Taliban. More than 17,000 Afghan interpreters were left behind to face torture and death and, in 2009, the U.S. government passed an act to supposedly help with this issue.  "In 2009, Congress passed the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009. The Act provided special immigrant visas (SIVs) to Afghans who had worked for at least one year as translators or interpreters, or who were employed by, or on behalf of, the U.S. government in Afghanistan, and whose lives were threatened because of their work in support of the U.S. mission. The visas allow these wartime allies to resettle in the United States." (https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/resource/afghan-special-immigrant-visa-program) Yet, under the Trump administration, the number of SIVs issued has significantly been reduced. Right now, they deny 90% of Iraqi and Afghani U.S. military interpreters who apply as refugees. This tragedy is an everyday reality for so many interpreters living in fear.  Thankfully, Muhammad has had an advocate in Kristy Perano and her family, who have tirelessly have spent the last several years campaigning and petitioning on his behalf to the government. Currently, Muhammad is still waiting but also pursuing immigration through Canada.  Let's help get the Kamran family to safety. For that to happen, WE NEED YOU! _____________________________________________ Here is how you can get involved and help: 1) Listen to Muhammad's story and share it on social media. We need to continue to get this message out.  2) Give to Muhammad's GoFundMe Campaign to help his family immigrate to Canada. He needs to raise $30,000.  https://www.gofundme.com/f/rescue-afghan-interpreter-and-family-from-taliban 3) Join his prayer team for updates and prayer requests. To be added to the list, please email save.aysha@gmail.com. 4) Helping SIV refugees through Keeping our Promise https://www.keepingourpromise.org/ Help new refugees in your community through organizations like World Relief and We Welcome Refugees. https://worldrelief.org/ https://www.wewelcomerefugees.com/  

Dette er fortellingen om Sivs gyllende hår, del 2. Her gjenforteller jeg historier ifra de Norønne heltesagnene og Norønn mytologi. Fortellinger om de gamle Norønne gudene, Tor, Odin, Loke og de andre Æsene. Passer best for 4 år og eldre.

Dette er fortellingen om Sivs gyllende hår, del 1. Her gjenforteller jeg historier ifra de Norønne heltesagnene og Norønn mytologi. Fortellinger om de gamle Norønne gudene, Tor, Odin, Loke og de andre Æsene. Passer best for 4 år og eldre. Neste lørdag, lørdag den 18. juli, kommer del 2.

Trampe har sett engelska 60-talsserien "At Last the 1948 Show", men samtalet handlar mindre om den än om Joddla med Sivs trummisar, Per Wirténs glasögon och 90-talsserien "Döda danskar räknas inte". Dessutom - hur många Lindemän finns det egentligen? See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Skräcken på Wiiks herrgård är ett introduktionsäventyr till Chock: Åter från graven, som en tapper spillra av Syndikatet spelade in under mellandagarna 2019. Detta är det fjärde avsnittet av fem, så hoppa in Dodge Ram:en och häng med på en hisnande skräckfärd! Gänget har hunnit bekanta sig med Wiiks herrgård och har både stött på kusligheter och ledtrådar som tyder på att något inte står rätt till här. Gittan och Robban är dock långt ifrån övertygade om någon övernaturlig närvaro. Kanske kan Miranda ändra deras åsikt med lite anden i glaset? Dessutom är Sivs stora stund kommen! Chock: Åter från graven ges ut av Eloso Förlag och Skräcken på Wiiks herrgård är skrivet av Jonas Larsson. Omslaget är gjort av Peter Sandberg. Spelledare: Adam Yngvesson Robin Gustavsson: Eric Herlin Gittan af Kroona: Martin Sellgren

Is your program seeking to increase enrollment among special immigrant visa (SIV) holders, asylees, and other ORR-eligible populations? Stream Switchboard's latest podcast, where Erica Bouris, Senior Technical Advisor for Economic Empowerment at the IRC, discusses ways to boost program enrollment among ORR-eligible clients you may not currently be reaching. She shares her thoughts on developing an outreach strategy that reaches more diverse client groups; describing your program to prospective clients, partners, and funders in language that doesn't focus exclusively on serving refugees; and leveraging your existing program data as you work to reach these new audiences.

Siv Jonsson i Ljungdalen tillhör den stora släkten Jonsson i Storsjö. Göran och Ruth Jonsson är hennes föräldrar och hennes farfar hette Lars-Johan och startade det första åkeriet i byn som hette Jonssons åkeri. Farfar köpte två lastbilar som Sivs pappa Göran och hans bror Ivan körde och de fortsatte att  driva gräv- och åkeriverksamhet… Läs mer »

Festen fortsetter med Andreas, Siv og Ulrik! Hvorfor er Andreas så opptatt av bodyshots? Hva er Sivs ultimate underboob-tips? Og hvordan burde man posere på bilder for å se så hot ut som Ulrik? See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This week Frank and Axel talk to Matt Zeller (https://twitter.com/mattczeller), a co-founder of No One Left Behind (http://nooneleft.org/ and https://twitter.com/n1leftbehind). While on a mission in Afghanistan, his interpreter, Janis Shinwari, picked up a gun and killed two Taliban who were ambushing Matt’s position from behind, saving his life. Matt helped get Janis to the U.S. through the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program and together they founded No One Left Behind. Its mission is to is to help America’s Wartime Allies with SIVs resettle safely in the United States.

Tatt opp i Sivis beskjedne hjem, 11.januar, 2017Vi starter denne etterlengte samtalen med å snakke om Sivis skuespillerkarierre før vi går videre og snakker om Lunken Kaffis utgåtte segment "Sivis Lunkne spørsmål til gjesten", Sivs mislykkede Tinderdates og min Tinder angst, katten Leeloo forstyrrer og samtalen sklir inn på henne, spansk snakk, sava sava, Sivi som språklærer, ordet koselig, sivis språkskryt, Leeloo dukker opp igjen og Sivi prøver å lure seg inn på et trist tema som raskt blir avfeid, dialektkurset til Siv, mer Leeloo, beskjeftigelse, litt om hunden jeg hadde i 2 dager, jeg er ikke så glad i dyr, jeg er kansje psykopat,"LUNKENT BEKJENTSKAP", utstillingen "Urom" og Stavanger Yogafestival 2017, "BERGMAN", Sivis yoga karriere, Gong-bad," the bachelor", kvinneversjonen av Ghostbusters, kjøpepress med hjelp av lyd i butikker, bukseslitasje, "SELVSKRYT", Sivi skryter av meg, "LUNKEN DAGBOK", så snakker vi litt om å gjøre narr av seg selv før vi avslutter med en buenos nachos! View fullsize

With the wisdom of a penny-stock investor trying out day-trading for the first time, the brilliant financial minds at CalPERS (California Public Employees' Retirement System) decided to dump more than a billion dollars into three “structured investment vehicles” or SIVs, backed by subprime mortgages. After all, Standard & Poors had given these three SIVs AAA ratings, […] The post SLAPP006 – CalPERS v. Moody's – Is an Opinion Always Protected Speech Under the Anti-SLAPP Statute? appeared first on California SLAPP Law.

With the wisdom of a penny-stock investor trying out day-trading for the first time, the brilliant financial minds at CalPERS (California Public Employees’ Retirement System) decided to dump more than a billion dollars into three “structured investment vehicles” or SIVs, backed by subprime mortgages. After all, Standard & Poors had given these three SIVs AAA ratings, […] The post SLAPP006 – CalPERS v. Moody’s – Is an Opinion Always Protected Speech Under the Anti-SLAPP Statute? appeared first on California SLAPP Law.

Listen to PodcastIt is our opinion that if an investment is difficult to understand or lacks transparency, then it should generally be avoided. In recent years, Wall Street has created a massive debacle as they have become victims of their own excessively complex financial products. One such product is called the Structured Investment Vehicle (SIV). A SIV borrows money by selling short-term paper to one group of investors at low interest rates and then they use that money to buy longer-term instruments with higher yields. They enhance the yield by utilizing leverage up to 15:1. SIVs are then sold to another group of investors in chunks of $1 to $30 billion. Essentially, a SIV is what we call a ‘financial burrito’ with all sorts of goodies inside including some spicy leverage. Many SIVs invested in solid long-term investments including mortgages, credit card debts, auto loan debts, student loan debts, royalties of various kinds, credit default swaps and complex derivative transactions. What really got SIVs in trouble was a class of investments now referred to as ‘toxic subprime debt’. The marketers of SIVs went up and down the financial world selling these ‘financial burritos’ to banks, insurance companies, pension funds, endowments, investment companies, brokerage firms, governments, sovereign wealth funds – you name it – anybody with a billion bucks to pony up. When the housing market peaked in the United States in August of 2006, the falling prices of homes reduced the value of mortgage debt in these SIVs. The leverage factor compounded losses and once yield-hungry investors quickly shunned these investments. As home prices continued to fall in 2007 some SIVs completely imploded. The so-called ‘smart money’ ran the for the exits all at once and many SIVs lost significant value putting additional pressure on the balance sheets of the financials institutions who owned them. In fact, the ironic double whammy came for some institutions who had loaned money to these SIVs. As losses piled up, liquidity evaporated and the value of SIVs continued to plummet and banks were strapped to make loans even to their most credit worthy customers. By the middle of 2008, over ½ trillion dollars has been lost by financial institutions and some people have estimated that the total losses will eventually be over $1 trillion^. The lesson we take away from this along with many other examples from Wall Street is that investments that appear overly complex, illiquid and lack transparency should be viewed with a large degree of skepticism. And make sure you know what is in your burrito. ^Bill Gross, PIMCO, Investment Outlook, Moooooo!, August 2008.