Podcasts about Lavoie

durée : 00:57:07 - LSD, la série documentaire - La Terre évolue dans un système autour du Soleil, lui-même embarqué dans une structure plus grande : notre galaxie et la Voie lactée. Contemplée depuis des siècles, cette structure s'est révélée au siècle dernier dans sa nébuleuse spirale, jusqu'au trou noir de son cœur. - équipe : Maryvonne Abolivier, Anahi Morales Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

AGOA : le Sénat américain ouvre la voie à une prolongation jusqu'en 2028 by TOPFM MAURITIUS

durée : 00:57:07 - LSD, la série documentaire - par : Céline Loozen - La Terre évolue dans un système autour du Soleil, lui-même embarqué dans une structure plus grande : notre galaxie et la Voie lactée. Contemplée depuis des siècles, cette structure s'est révélée au siècle dernier dans sa nébuleuse spirale, jusqu'au trou noir de son cœur. - réalisation : Marie Plaçais

This week on Breaking Battlegrounds, hosts Chuck Warren and Sam Stone examine China's growing challenge to the United States, disturbing allegations involving fentanyl enforcement in New Mexico, the latest developments surrounding Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, a 33-year-old NBA All-Star Weekend murder finally solved, and a dramatic migration crisis unfolding in Ceuta. Michael Sobolik, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and author of Countering China's Great Game: A Strategy for American Dominance, joins Chuck and Sam to explain why he believes Washington has failed to adequately respond to China's political warfare. They discuss TikTok and ByteDance, America's dependence on Chinese supply chains, Taiwan's security, advanced semiconductor exports, India's growing strategic importance, and why rebuilding the U.S. defense industrial base could be critical in a future confrontation with Beijing. Follow Michael Sobolik on X: @michaelsobolik Book: Countering China's Great Game: A Strategy for American Dominance Next, Vince Torres, Executive Director of America First New Mexico, joins the show to discuss New Mexico's fentanyl crisis and allegations from DEA whistleblowers that agents were told not to seize certain large drug shipments. Vince also breaks down the state's education struggles, the push for school choice, and changing voter-registration trends that could reshape New Mexico politics. Follow Vince Torres on X: @VincentTorresNM Then, B's Crime Corner takes us back to Salt Lake City and the 1993 NBA All-Star Weekend, where a woman was murdered in a case that remained unsolved for more than three decades. New forensic technology ultimately helped investigators identify a suspect, leading to an arrest and guilty plea in 2025. Alex Welz, Senior Research Associate at The Heritage Foundation, joins the program with an update on the Iran war and what escalating tensions could mean for global energy markets and the Strait of Hormuz. He discusses Iran's weakened military and economic position, continued support from Russia and potentially China, Pakistan's regional role, and efforts to revive the Kirkuk-Banias pipeline as another route for Middle Eastern energy. Follow Alex Welz on X: @WelzAlex Finally, Quebec-based Rebel News journalist Alexa Lavoie joins Chuck Warren following her reporting from Ceuta. She describes how social-media claims about an supposedly open border helped trigger a massive attempted migration from Morocco, the role she says Moroccan authorities played in the crisis, the use of unaccompanied minors, and the growing divide inside Ceuta over humanitarian assistance, security, and control of the Spanish territory. Follow Alexa Lavoie on X: @ThevoiceAlexa Listen now to Breaking Battlegrounds, the radio show covering Arizona politics, campus unrest, election integrity, national campaigns, and the true crime cases everyone is talking about. Catch Breaking Battlegrounds live on 960 AM in Phoenix every Saturday at 9:00 AM, with full episodes and exclusive podcast-only segments dropping every Friday wherever you get your podcasts or watch on Youtube. Stay connected with Breaking Battlegrounds: • Substack: https://substack.com/@breakingbattlegrounds • Website: https://breakingbattlegrounds.vote • News: https://breakingbattlegrounds.news • X: https://x.com/breaking_battle • Instagram: @breakingbattlegrounds • Facebook: Breaking Battlegrounds If you enjoy the show, please leave us a 5-star review and share it with a friend. Your support helps keep the podcast growing. Breaking Battlegrounds is one of the top 2.5% most popular shows out of 3,779,399 podcasts globally. We interview policymakers, elected officials, and nationally and world-recognized reporters about the opportunities and hurdles the United States faces.

Nombre de discours nous enjoignent, à raison, à assumer nos failles et notre vulnérabilité. Mais comment faire pour que cela ne reste pas un vœu pieux ? La pensée chinoise, par sa finesse et sa grandeur, peut être une aide précieuse. J'en parle dans cet épisode avec mon amie Marie-Pierre Dillenseger.Le livre de Marie-Pierre : https://www.lisez.com/livres/le-feu-interieur-23-pratiques-quotidiennes-pour-liberer-votre-vitalite/9782266327817Mon site : https://www.fabricemidal.comReso, mon école de méditation : https://www.reso.coRediffusion, première diffusion le 12 mai 2022.Réalisation, montage, image et son : Alexandre AgostiniMots clé : La vitalité d'une société, sa capacité de rebond et d'adaptation, dépend de la vitalité de chacun de ses membres. Le moment est venu d'agir individuellement, ensemble.Aimez vos cicatrices.Prenez les problèmes à l'envers.Laissez couler.Osez initier.Pour être pleinement qui nous sommes, pour surmonter les difficultés, les blocages, il est essentiel de savoir cultiver notre vitalité.Mais comment la cultiver ? Commet nourrir notre feu intérieur ? Comment trouver des ressources inattendues en soi-même ?Il suffit de suivre l'extraordinaire méthode de Marie-Pierre Dillenseger qui implique aussi bien le corps et les émotions que des énergies plus subtiles. Fondée sur les principes des grands arts chinois, Marie-Pierre Dillenseger rend accessible les principes les plus profonds.Vous aussi découvrez l'art de cultiver le courage, l'énergie et la force dont vous avez besoin." Un carnet de bord à ouvrir à n'importe quelle page pour puiser la force et le courage de réaliser ses envies. " Esprit YogaMarie-Pierre Dillenseger est l'une des principales spécialistes françaises des pratiques de vitalité chinoises (qi gong, feng shui, art de la guerre, yi king). Elle est l'auteure de plusieurs livres, dont Debout : la force de s'incarner, Oser s'accomplir : 12 clés pour être soi (Mama Éditions, 2019 et 2021), La Voie du feng shui : chevaucher le temps, apprivoiser l'espace, trouver sa place (Dunod, 2016) et Le Feu intérieur (Robert Laffont, 2022).

Est-ce que cela vous arrive parfois de repenser à un souvenir, heureux ou douloureux, fort en tout cas, et d'en ressentir toutes les émotions comme si vous reviviez la scène ? Parfois ça peut remonter à plusieurs années, mais le ressenti lui reste intact et c'est comme là, imprimé dans notre corps. Et bien comment faire justement quand cette sensation nous encombre, voire même elle nous empêche d'avancer ? Comment faire pour enfin digérer cette émotion et lui permettre de prendre sa juste place de souvenir, sans être aussi vivace ici et maintenant ? Et bien, c'est tout ce que propose l'EMDR, cette approche thérapeutique relativement récente dont Valérie Libri nous parle aujourd'hui dans La petite voix. Pour l'ancienne chanteuse lyrique, c'est simple, l'EMDR l'a sauvée et lui a permis de revenir à la vie après l'un des pires traumatismes que l'on puisse imaginer. Bienvenue dans un épisode puissant, touchant et plein d'espoir, avec celle qui se présente comme une acharnée du bonheur. Avec Valérie, nous allons parler de passion pour la musique, d'un chemin d'acceptation, d'une initiation au chamanisme qui l'ouvre à la spiritualité et de l'EMDR, cette thérapie profondément transformatrice.RÉSUMÉ DE L'ÉPISODE AVEC VALÉRIE BRY00:00 Introduction du podcast et présentation de l'épisode03:17 Valérie Bry, chanteuse lyrique reconvertie à la thérapie EMDR04:15 Des études chaotiques et une vocation musicale mise entre parenthèses07:11 L'accident qui emporte son fils Benjamin et son père en 199508:48 Le monde invisible qui s'ouvre après le drame, puis la dépression colossale12:02 La découverte de l'EMDR dans un livre, une évidence immédiate13:13 La tentative de suicide révélée et l'urgence de trouver un outil14:42 Deux ans et demi de thérapie : retomber amoureuse, redevenir mère18:39 Le burn-out, l'hyperacousie et la bascule vers l'EMDR comme métier21:56 Ce qu'est vraiment l'EMDR : digérer les émotions plutôt que les gérer, à travers des exemples concrets de séancesNotes sur l'épisode :- Le rituel de Valérie : un ancrage inspiré de rites chamaniques chaque matin- Son conseil lecture : les 7 plumes de l'aigle de Henri Gougaud, La Voie sacrée du guerrier de Chögyam Chogyam trungpa, Dharma et créativité de Chögyam TrungpaEMDR • thérapie trauma • guérison émotionnelle • digérer ses émotions • témoignage • transformation personnelle • traumatisme • liberté intérieureSi vous aimez La petite voix, je compte sur vous pour laisser des commentaires, des étoiles ✨ et des bonnes notes sur votre plateforme de podcast préférée. Merci

En RD Congo, la coalition d'opposition C64 vient de s'exprimer pour vivement critiquer la Cour constitutionnelle, tout en donnant rendez-vous au peuple congolais le 15 août prochain. Une prise de parole qui intervient au lendemain de la validation, par la Cour constitutionnelle, de la loi référendaire qui pourrait ouvrir la voie à un troisième mandat pour le président Félix Tshisekedi.

Avant que le rap féminin ne s'impose en France, certaines femmes ont dû se battre pour prouver qu'elles avaient leur place derrière un micro. Lady Laistee fait partie de ces pionnières. Dans cet épisode de La Bascule, elle revient sur son parcours, de son enfance entre la Guadeloupe et la métropole à son ascension dans le rap français, en passant par les épreuves qui ont bouleversé sa vie et transformé sa vision du succès.Aujourd'hui, de nombreuses femmes brillent sur la scène du rap français. Mais avant elles, il a fallu des artistes capables d'ouvrir la voie, dans un milieu où tout semblait réservé aux hommes.Lady Laistee est de celles qui ont osé. Née en Guadeloupe avant de rejoindre la métropole dans son enfance, elle découvre très tôt le hip-hop. D'abord la danse, puis les mots. Le rap devient rapidement un espace de liberté, un moyen d'exprimer ce qu'elle n'osait pas dire ailleurs. Sans modèle féminin, sans mode d'emploi, elle construit son chemin à force de travail, de détermination et de convictions.Au fil de la conversation, elle revient sur les débuts du rap français, les préjugés auxquels elle a dû faire face, son refus d'être enfermée dans l'étiquette de « rap féminin » et la manière dont toute une génération a contribué à faire évoluer les mentalités.Mais cet épisode dépasse largement la musique.Lady Laistee partage avec une grande sincérité les épreuves qui ont marqué son existence : la disparition tragique de son frère, les blessures de son enfance, le courage de mettre des mots sur des violences longtemps gardées sous silence, puis cet AVC qui aurait pu mettre un terme à son parcours.À travers chacune de ces bascules, elle raconte comment la foi, la résilience et l'envie de transmettre lui ont permis de continuer à avancer.Aujourd'hui, son regard sur la réussite a profondément changé. Plus qu'une carrière, elle souhaite laisser un héritage, accompagner les nouvelles générations et rappeler qu'un artiste ne se construit pas seulement avec du talent, mais aussi avec du courage, de la patience et une profonde fidélité à soi-même.Un échange sincère, puissant et inspirant sur la force de croire en ses rêves, même lorsque personne n'y croit encore.Parce qu'un rêve ne reste qu'un rêve tant qu'on n'ose pas le poursuivre.Bienvenue dans La Bascule, le podcast qui révèle sa véritable nature.

Editorial note: This conversation was recorded live at SIAL Canada in late April — well before the July CUSMA review deadline and the most recent U.S. tariff actions targeting Canada. Some of the optimism expressed here about a smooth CUSMA outcome should be heard in that context. It's become a Food Professor tradition: every year at SIAL Canada, hosts Michael LeBlanc and Dr. Sylvain Charlebois sit down with Martin Lavoie, President and CEO of Groupe Export Agroalimentaire Québec-Canada, for a state-of-the-nation check-in on Canadian agri-food trade. This bonus episode, recorded live on the SIAL Canada show floor in Montreal, picks up exactly one year after their last conversation — and at the time, a lot had already changed. Lavoie opens by reflecting on the whiplash of the prior twelve months. Since "Liberation Day" tariffs rattled Canadian exporters the previous spring, Quebec's agri-food sector had kept growing despite the uncertainty, but the volatility had taken a toll: lost U.S. customers, disrupted contracts, and a level of unpredictability Lavoie says he'd never seen in his career. He walks through how Groupe Export helped member companies navigate the chaos — from renegotiating who absorbs tariff costs to bracing for policy shifts announced, at times, over social media. The conversation turns to CUSMA (USMCA), then under review, with Lavoie offering a cautiously optimistic read at the time: dismantling the agreement would be so disruptive to deeply integrated U.S. industries that he believed cooler heads would prevail on both sides of the border. Listeners should weigh that optimism against what's actually unfolded since the July deadline and the latest U.S. tariff moves against Canada. A major theme is diversification. Lavoie argues Mexico represents Quebec's single biggest near-term opportunity — logistically easier than overseas markets and increasingly motivated to reduce its own reliance on U.S. imports. He also flags growing momentum in Japan, Korea, Southeast Asia, and Europe, while acknowledging the real barriers: time zones, market development costs, and a Canadian logistics network still built for trucking to the U.S. rather than shipping by ocean freight. Comparing Canada to the Netherlands' export powerhouse model, he makes the case for urgent investment in port infrastructure, warehousing, and resolving ongoing labour disruptions at Canadian ports. Domestically, Lavoie and Charlebois dig into interprovincial trade — noting it's often cheaper and easier for a Quebec exporter to ship to New York than to Calgary — and discuss data from an MNP survey showing Canada ranks as a top-tier nation for agri-food reputation among G20 countries, trailing only the Netherlands. The episode closes with a practical overview of how Groupe Export supports Quebec exporters: 30-40 trade missions and shows per year, shipping and regulatory support, market intelligence, and export-readiness evaluations for companies just getting started. A time-capsule look at where Quebec's agri-food exporters stood mid-storm — worth hearing alongside what's happened since. About UsDr. Sylvain Charlebois is a Visiting Professor in Food Policy and Distribution at McGill University and a Professor in Food Distribution and Policy in the Faculty of Management at Dalhousie University in Halifax. He is also the Senior Director of the Agri-food Analytics Lab, also located at Dalhousie University.Known as “The Food Professor”, his current research interest lies in the broad area of food distribution, security and safety. He is one of the world's most cited scholars in food supply chain management, food value chains and traceability with over 775 published peer-reviewed journal articles. Dr. Charlebois is also an editor for the prestigious Trends in Food Science Technology journal. He co-hosts The Food Professor podcast, discussing issues in the food, foodservice, grocery and restaurant industries and which is the most listened Canadian management podcast in Canada. Every year since 2012, he has published the now highly anticipated Canadian Food Price Report, which provides an overview of food price trends for the coming year. Furthermore, his research has been featured in several newspapers and media groups, nationally as well as internationally. He has testified on several occasions before parliamentary committees on food policy-related issues as an expert witness. He has been asked to act as an advisor on food and agricultural policies in many Canadian provinces and other countries.With extensive experience collaborating with businesses, governments, and NGOs, Dr. Charlebois combines academic rigor with practical expertise, making him one of the most influential voices in the global agri-food landscape. His work continues to advance the understanding of food systems, fostering innovation and resilience in a rapidly evolving industry. In 2025, he received the prestigious Charles III medal recognizing his tremendous work in informing Canadians about food issues. Michael LeBlanc is a senior retail advisor, keynote speaker and media entrepreneur. Michael has delivered keynotes, hosted fire-side discussions hosted senior retail executive on-stage in 1:1 interviews worldwide. Michael produces and hosts a network of leading retail trade podcasts, including The Remarkable Retail Podcast, The Voice of Retail, The Food Professor, The FEED powered by Loblaw and the Global eCommerce Leaders podcast. He has been recognized by the National Retail Federation (NRF) as a global Top Retail Voice for 2025 and 2025, and continues to be a ReThink Retail Top Retail Expert for the fifth year in a row.

Dans cet épisode, je parle de cette guerre salariat vs entreprenariat qui fait rage sur les réseaux sociaux. Le plus important est comment vous libérez votre âme peu importe le moyen utilisé.

Meet Antoine Lavoie, a Quebec-born, Edmonton-based military veteran who decided to try his hand at chocolate making during the pandemic and then followed this newfound passion into a whole new career as a chocolatier.  Learn more about Antoine's products at:   https://www.delavoyechocolate.ca/   Follow on social media at: @delavoyechocolate  #chocolate, #eatlocal, #tastecanada, #Alberta, #HarrowsmithMag, #MakeGrowSustainShare, #Harrowsmith50th,

  Episode: 140 RAISING PPA assessment and treatment from the Ground Up: In Conversation with Jeanne Gallée     In this episode you will discover: · Assessment and Intervention Aren't Separate — Conversation itself can double as both. By listening closely and responding to what a client offers, in a "more art than science" way, clinicians gather meaningful data and provide support at the same time, rather than treating these as two distinct phases of care. · Rigid Testing Can Erase the Person Behind the Diagnosis — Traditional standardized assessments often serve the goals of an institution or research protocol more than the person being assessed. Frameworks like RAISE and the PACT scale shift the focus toward strengths, natural conversation, and what someone can still do, rather than repeatedly measuring decline. · PPA Needs Its Own Identity and Training Path — Because primary progressive aphasia sits uneasily between post-stroke aphasia care and traditional dementia care, clinicians often receive little formal training in it. A global survey found major gaps in education and confidence, underscoring the need for dedicated resources, like Dr. Gallée's PPA roadmap, built specifically for this population. Do you ever wish you could step back in time and undo the missteps and errors of the past? What if you had the opportunity to build something from the ground up? Certainly, knowing what you know now, you could begin in a better place. But of course, there's always pitfalls with new beginnings, even with the knowledge of lessons from the past. You could, however, make a positive impact on that new beginning. Welcome to the Aphasia Access Conversations podcast. I'm Jerry Hoepner, a professor from the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire, and co-facilitator of the Chippewa Valley Aphasia Camp, Blue Gold Brain Injury Group, Mayo Brain Injury Group, Young Persons Brain Injury Group, Brain In-Cog, and Thursday Night Poets. I'm also a member of the Aphasia Access Podcast Working Group. Aphasia Access strives to provide members with information, inspiration, and ideas about their aphasia care through a variety of educational resources. I'm privileged to introduce today's guest, Dr. Jeanne Gallée, who is a clinical scientist in the Department of Medicine at the University of Washington. Dr. Gallée is a licensed speech language pathologist practicing in the greater Washington state area. She completed her Bachelor of Arts in Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences at Wellesley College in 2016 and Doctor of Philosophy at Harvard University in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology in 2021. She has been recognized as a Distinguished Early Career Professional by ASHA and a Distinguished Scholar by the Tavistock Trust for Aphasia. Her work is dedicated to improving assessment practices and functional outcomes for individuals living with aphasia and neurodegenerative conditions. Jerry Hoepner: Jeanne, it's really nice to see you again today, and to have this opportunity to have a conversation with you as a recent recipient of the Tavistock Scholar Program, and to talk about your work with individuals with primary progressive aphasia. So, thanks for being "on" today for the conversation. Jeanne Gallée: Thank you so much for having me, Jerry. I'm really honored to be here. Jerry Hoepner: Likewise, I'm really excited for this conversation, and as I just alluded to, I wanted to congratulate you on being awarded the first Tavistock Scholar with an emphasis doing work in primary progressive aphasia, and I thought maybe I could get your thoughts on being selected as a Tavistock Scholar. Jeanne Gallée: Thank you. It feels honestly incredibly remarkable in the sense that I think it represents a shift in how we're thinking about the separate diagnoses of progressive aphasia versus an aphasia that's due to an acute injury. And I'm really honored to be a part of that. I think there have been many discussions growing over the years, and I think we're seeing that shift in how we do think about addressing assessment and intervention and general care for people across the aphasia continuum. Jerry Hoepner: Agreed, I think there's been so much growth in the last five years in that area. I can remember at the outset of the pandemic, having discussions about "What do we do with people with primary progressive aphasia who were a part of our aphasia group? Should they be a part of our aphasia group? How do we pivot to that in an online context?" and it feels like we've come so far in our conversation about where primary progressive aphasia fits in in all of those different contexts. Jeanne Gallée: Right, I entirely agree, and I think the journey of my own work has already evolved in so many ways that I couldn't have imagined, like you say, five years ago I completed my doctoral work March 2021 and just seeing the phenomenal amounts of change that have really taken place since then has been incredible, and I feel very lucky to be part of that momentum right now. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, it's exciting to see these things move forward. And one of the differences that I see is primary progressive aphasia started out within the Life Participation Approach, just soundly from day one, as opposed to a lot of aphasia care, which has kind of evolved from this medical model, and how refreshing it is to see something built from the ground up. Done right, so to speak. I don't know if you have thoughts on that piece… Jeanne Gallée: No, I do. I think that's a really interesting point. I think I might be part of the camp that at times feels like progressive conditions get a little bit lost in the rehabilitation space, but I think you're absolutely right. I think the absence of pharmacological treatment, or a cure that has long standing effects for these progressive conditions has made rehabilitation specialists much more attuned to focusing on quality of life, life participation, maintaining autonomy, and so forth. So, I think I forget that perspective sometimes. Perhaps from the space that I work in, I tend to be in a more interdisciplinary environment where I feel on the opposite end. I'm often asked for justification for providing these types of services, and that fits in nicely with our previous discussion on how we do see that differentiation and how people with aphasia due to a progressive condition may be siloed from people who have the more quote unquote traditional aphasia symptoms. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, that's a really good point. And you know, referring to those previous conversations we discussed that need for primary progressive aphasia to have a space of its own. It's tricky because it doesn't fit into post-stroke aphasia quite right, and it doesn't fit into the Alzheimer's and dementia world quite right. So, yeah, it's nice to see this developing in the Life Participation kind of context, really excited about Anna Volkmer's conference dedicated to primary progressive aphasia. Yeah, what an excellent point, that even though we feel like it's great to build it from the ground up, there's still people in that interdisciplinary context, who are very much looking at this, like,"Justify this. How is having conversations and doing activities with someone justifiable, as a, you know, as a skilled intervention?" Jeanne Gallée: Right. I think a lot of it comes back to misunderstandings about the scope of our profession. So, coming from the speech language pathology standpoint, we may have a perspective that other providers may not. And it's interesting, particularly when that confusion or disconnect happens in conditions that are communication led, where we see the symptoms primarily touching upon our ability to interact verbally or non-verbally to communicate. And it's fascinating, and I think speaking to that silo, we see PPA having been a relatively new and still considered very rare condition, but there's so much overlap with other conditions, right, in the kinds of symptoms that we see and there's so much where, as any speech pathologist with experience in acquired neurogenic communication disorders, we can see that we can apply our skill set, but again, likely due to the terminal nature of the condition, we end up seeing providers taking it a different route, or saying either there's only the pharmacological route, or we just let it lie or let it be as is, which we wouldn't do with any other condition. We wouldn't say that for someone with ALS. We would want to provide them the supports, even if they're temporary, to improve quality of life. So, it is an interesting, almost cultural phenomenon as well. I think. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, that I think it's really fascinating, and I'm so glad you brought that up. It reminds me of kind of the phrase, the company we keep, right? It's easy to be amongst, you know, people who are in the [Life Participation Approach to Aphasia] LPPA world, who think the way that we think, and who do the way that we do. And I do a lot of work in the area of cognitive communication disorders with acquired brain injuries, and so forth, and there's been a remarkable shift in the last five years there as well towards a more Life Participation bio psychosocial approach, and some of the work that I've been passionate about for years has been more and more accepted. So you feel like when you're in that company of all of your people that everything's all good, but it also reminds me of something that my friend Natalie Douglas always says, which is that "We need to be out there amongst others who need to understand the importance of this kind of a perspective, and sharing that." And when you talked about those other professionals, I really didn't think about that until you said that. Right, really important to get them on the same page, and to help them understand why this is so important. Jeanne Gallée: Right? And I think that's where the conference that you mentioned, the first PPA only conference that's taking place this summer in London, is so special because one of the reasons why we were so motivated to have this type of a conference is that there wasn't really the space at the typical aphasiology conferences, and then the larger neurology-based conferences, or more broadly dementia-based conferences, also didn't quite feel like a home. I think, especially their studies of quality of life, in particular, we're really not seen as rigorous in those contexts. So, this conference, what's nice is that we have that uniting force of everyone being focused on PPA, but it's super interdisciplinary, and that I think will really promote some fantastic conversations. Jerry Hoepner: Wow, that's really encouraging and exciting to see that move forward. I'm not in the primary progressive aphasia world, although when we're at aphasia camp and things like that, certainly that's a part of my role. But as soon as I saw the call for papers come out, I'm, you know, texting and messaging all of my PPA folks to say, "Did you see this? This is great. Are you doing something?" It's very exciting. So, I'm excited to see where that moves in the future and to hear how things go this time around. That's great. Jeanne Gallée: Likewise, I'm really excited, and I do really believe it will lead to a whole future cascade of collaboration. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, amazing. Well, before we delve into your amazing work, I've been reading your articles, and it's been just a pleasure to read it. I'm always impressed with how certain themes of importance can come across in different areas of our field, and it's been fun to see that. I wonder, because I'm looking at the list of collaborators, just some incredible collaborators on that list, in those papers, I'd love to hear a little bit about your mentorship, both in primary progressive aphasia and kind of thinking about the Life Participation quality of life kind of context as well. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, I think in hindsight my mentorship experience seems more linear than it did in the moment. And I think it goes back to my original journey in my doctoral program. The program I was in, the Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology program at Harvard was a little bit different from others, where we didn't apply to work with a specific mentor, but truly just to get into the program. And they encouraged a pretty extensive shopping period to work with a variety of mentors to get a feel for topic area, mentorship style, and so traditionally first year students didn't even have any experiences, they just focused on the very time-intensive and rigorous coursework. I came in and started my first experience with Evelina Fedorenko at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who had worked with an undergrad. And that I think from the get-go gave me a very holistic view. I think, of the ways in which we could think about language, and in particular, the language network. So, there I was working on MRI studies of what activations do we see in the language network. In response to linguistic stimuli. And we were working with undergrads at MIT who were all healthy between the ages of 18 through 30, and I just felt at a certain point that I had this growing interest towards thinking about what happens when something goes wrong. So when it's atypical processing of language. I first thought I might be interested in pediatric population, so I was all over the place, but through the partnership that my program had with the MGH Institute of Health Professionals, I ended up having this amazing opportunity to be mentored by Evelina Federenko, as well as Sophia Vallila Rohter at the Institute of Health Professions, as well as the Frontotemporal Disorders Unit at Mass General Hospital, through my actual clinical training. So I had this quite hefty consortium of mentors, and I think that has its own set of challenges, right? It's a little bit less mentor-directed and more on the student to say, "This is exactly what I want to work on." But I think that allowed me to build a network of experiences and mentors, and that just has bled into every experience I've had since then. I also think the pandemic, you brought that up before, had a huge role in this, and all of a sudden people were very, very open to virtual meetings and connections and wanted connection. I think everyone felt very stuck at home and wanted to find more people and to find meaning and Anna Volkmer and I had the opportunity to meet at the Academy of Aphasia in Macau in 2019. And honestly meeting her in our connection has been also one of those launching pads for me to really jump out into the world of international collaboration. So all that to say, I think a lot of chance encounters and just a lot of plunging into possible conversations head first has led to this phenomenal mentorship team. And a lot of people who I collaborate with now I see as my inadvertent mentors, and that includes Anna, that includes Maya Henry at UT Austin, Amy Mooney in Oregon, just people who have consistently volunteered their time to mentor me in ways in which I can only say I would have never expected. Jade Cartwright and I have had such a phenomenal collaboration over the past few years as well, where we just had the same interests, and Zoom allowing, we were able to build on those. Jerry Hoepner: That's really an amazing answer to that question. I love the term inadvertent mentors, because I just think that those are the best mentors, where you're as much a mentor to them as they are to you. And it's just this really reciprocal relationship, but it's also built on this organic, like passion and interest for the same kinds of topics. Where it's not forced and that's a really nice kind of look back on your entire process. I was also struck by the term "mentor shopping", or "mentor shopping period", whatever. And I think that's really great that you had an opportunity for that not to be so mentor-led, and I mean it clearly shows through when you talk about your clinical experience and how that was connected to your research experience, and kind of all used to create this amalgamation of who you are. I mean, it's clear in talking with you, it's clear in reading your work that you have that strong, multi prong kind of basis. It's not just research, it's not just this specific area of research, it's really broad and the clinical connection is there, so that makes a lot of sense when I hear you talk about that, for sure. Jeanne Gallée: Oh, thank you. Yeah, I think in hindsight, again, it seems more linear, and in the moment it sometimes felt a little wild, I will say, in terms of just wrangling what do I actually want to pursue, and how. And I'm still figuring that out. But I think this community of collaborators and mentors is truly what has kept me in the field and as well. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, I think when you can connect with other people who are passionate about the work that you're doing. I can't imagine sitting at alone in my office doing a project, and I mean it's just so much more fun when you're doing it with other people. And other people who can expand the way that you think, which I'm sure everyone that you've mentioned on that list really does, when you can say, "Well, I think we should do it this way" and someone says, "Have you thought about…" and it just completely wrecks your world in a good way, "Like, oh my gosh, I didn't think about that, that's so exciting!" and then you just get into this back and forth. Yeah, very fun to hear about that. And again, it clearly shows through in the work that you do. In our previous conversations, you also mentioned this idea, and this again built on those clinical foundations that your initial mission was really to help develop interventions for people with primary progressive aphasia, and then you kind of got not off track, but inadvertently focused on working on assessments. You mentioned that there's just such a need, and this is so common in a lot of areas, but there's a need for more person-centered, ecologically valid strength-based assessment, and that the traditional measures just don't tell us enough. So, I'm really excited to talk about the work that you're doing on assessment, and how that brings us closer to what we need from an intervention standpoint, too. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, so that really is at the heart of what has been my experience. Also, right from the get-go, we started talking about the differences, or the possible differentiation that the field has historically taken in thinking about post-stroke aphasia versus primary progressive aphasia. One of my first real PPA projects in my doctoral work was meant to be a naming treatment study for people living with PPA, and one of the roadblocks I kept hitting was also my mentors and reviewers telling me that I was trying to add too many things. And in that process I realized I don't think just using something that exists for post-stroke aphasia is going to be the best way to address the patients I'm seeing right now. And it's not because there's something wrong with that treatment. That treatment was not designed for these individuals. And that led to many more rabbit holes, and you know me really just feeling this existential crisis of "Well, why are we working on the stimuli that we are, and why are we asking questions about these ones?" And I have so much respect for the assessments that exist, and the individuals behind them, and the time they invested in making them. I am also of the belief that we can move forward and improve our processes. There are certain assessments that may be widely used and have so much again power behind them. You know, we have best associated certain assessments with characterizing a diagnosis, but what I ended up seeing in my placements and throughout my clinical work is that many assessments serve more of a mission of an institution or a research protocol than the person being assessed. And in the face of a person with a terminal condition who is using their precious time to serve you in that space, I just think it's so much more important, or that much more important, to really consider what is most functional for them. What will serve them? And how we, how can we give back to that person? And again, part of that emotion, I think, comes from having worked in many research-centered spaces, where someone might not get intervention afterwards, or they might not understand why they are participating in up to five hours of assessment, and I think that's where that passion for focusing on reprioritizing the patient or the client really came from. Jerry Hoepner: I think that attention to "what's in it for them", is really important and clearly based in kind of where your heart is at and where your clinical mindset is at. Because it's easy to go in and say, "Well, we need this data. We need all the data that we get." but to what end, right? Like, how is it going to help? And how is that going to give us any more information about how to help this person, then what they can't do, right? So, I appreciate that mindset a lot, you know. It makes me think, and this is a little off track, and we didn't talk about this question earlier, but what a shift it will be clinicians working with people with primary progressive aphasia, and how they'll be able to shift from using kind of the existing tools that were out there for other purposes to moving towards tools that are designed specifically for people with PPA, and maybe just a snapshot of your thoughts about that piece. Jeanne Gallée: So I think it's really important to know where the field comes from, the work in which it was grounded in. So, I think it, it makes sense to talk about standardized assessment scores. It makes sense to talk about, you know, the specific assessments that can help us quickly differentiate presentations or needs, right? So, using the symptom-led approach, can we identify specific behaviors really quickly in a standardized way? I think the issue comes in when we stop being dynamic in how we use them. It's very easy to use an assessment in a way that feels rote. It feels just like a test, and it's like you said, "just collecting data for the purpose of collecting data." And lose that aspect of humanity. And maybe I'm putting words in other clinicians' mouths, but especially when a certain condition is rare, like PPA is. You may not have very much experience with seeing someone with PPA, or any type of progressive condition, and feel really stuck and needing to be in the motivation of being really professional, sticking to a certain set of tests. "This feels right." Right, this is what someone told me to do. I can fill this out, and there's something very potentially vulnerable or scary about just going with your gut in those moments. And what Anna Volkmer and I have spoken about so often is just the power of having a conversation with someone, and seeing what you can learn from that conversation, not only about the person themselves, but their communication behaviors. And how you can get so much from that conversation, including the trust and comfort of the client in front of you. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, yeah. One of the things that I think about when you're talking about that is, in working with people with acquired brain injuries and traumatic brain injuries one of the things I've learned is they will tell you, or they will ask, right? They'll say, "What is this? "What kind of information is this giving you?" "Why do we have to do this stupid test?" And I think that's good. I think that's a mindset that we should have when we're thinking about all of the assessments that we do. Why are we doing this? Is this really necessary? And they're very willing to say, "If it's necessary, that's fine, I'll do it, but are you getting something from this that I'm not seeing?" Right, I love that question, and I think it speaks to what you just said, right? Like, there's so much information that we can gather from conversations, from our interactions with people, we should be thinking about getting that, and if we're doing something else, we should have a why directly following, yeah. Jeanne Gallée: Yes, the why is so important, and you're right. Sometimes we do just need to get certain information. I think for me, one of the most striking moments early on in my training was having small talk. You know, just conversation with a person with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, and thinking, "Wow, this all feels quite typical. I'm curious about why they're here? What their testing will look like…" and then moving on to the Boston Naming Test and immediately seeing the challenges that came. That dichotomy is really helpful to have in those moments, but again, there's the argument of why are we asking about the name abacus, right? Why are we using that right now, and how does that represent how someone is performing functionally in their everyday life? Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, yeah, totally. I agree. Can you share a little bit about the RAISE framework, which I really love, because it relates to the way that I think about assessment from the standpoint of counseling, like you build on relationships and connections. William Miller is famous for saying, "The last thing you should ever do at the beginning of a session is assessment." You're beginning of a relationship with someone, don't assess first thing. So, I love that piece, and then thinking about the pact, and I'll let you kind of expand those, but I'll let you unpack them – ha ha- but how that starts to move us towards intervention. Jeanne Gallée: Right. So the RAISE assessment framework was really built out of those conversations, and I guess realizations on my own part about that discomfort with the really rigid end that assessment can…I'll restate that. The rigidity that assessment can have, so again speaking to really, really standardized sets and rigid protocols of specific measures that someone uses, and like you said, having the experience of multiple research participants, as well as patients, asking "Why are we doing this? I know I'm not good at this. Why are we doing it again and again?" And in those moments, not feeling like I had the power to really justify exactly why we were doing everything, apart from, "Oh, this is important for the research study." Which it was, but just feeling like there was that aspect of humanity that was missing, and coming up with my own toolkit in those moments to fill in those blanks. So right after the completion of my PhD, Anna Volkmar and I started speaking a lot more about the power of conversational assessment. And then that led into conversations where we worked with Anne Whitworth, Deborah Hersh, and Jade Cartwright, where again, through the power of Zoom across all times. I was pregnant with my first, and meeting everyone usually at midnight my time. I already was nocturnal at that point!  Where we would just be discussing all of these issues, and what was amazing about this is that, particularly Anne and Deb come from more of the post-stroke aphasia world, and had these amazing principles grounded in those populations where Deborah Hersh had also really come forward with the concept of therapeutic assessment. So as you had said assessment and intervention shouldn't be separate, they belong together and coexist at all times if we're smart about it. And what we ended up doing, first informally and then formally through the more official Delphi process is coming up with a set of principles as a framework for assessment. So, to take a step away from, "Oh, it's just Lucy Goosey, we're having a conversation and chit chat." What we're actually promoting is a pretty structured set of principles to guide the ways in which we can cultivate assessment for individuals with PPA and their loved ones. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, absolutely. I was kind of scanning on my computer, I was trying to think of the name. I love this name of the article, where it says, 'Please don't assess me to death, or something like that. Jeanne Gallée: Yes, yeah. Jerry Hoepner:  Yeah, and, and thinking about that whole entire process from beginning to end as a relationship, as you know, not discreetly assessment, not discreetly intervention, I think it's just really important. Can you talk a little bit about the PACT and kind of where that has moved things in terms of the assessment piece, but also kind of set a set up for intervention and what that looks like? Jeanne Gallée: Great, so the PACT the Progressive Aphasia Communication Toolkit kit builds off of what we put forth with the RAISE assessment framework. So with RAISE we promote that the relationship might be temporary, it might be a single interaction, or it might be long term, and we cultivate that through conversation and then the PACT is a set of scales that leverages that conversation, we take that natural or as natural as can be interaction and use it to come up with a concrete framework of communication strengths. So that might all sound very esoteric. To make that more concrete, there are four scales to the PACT. They're all clinician ratings, where the clinician is asked to look at a pre-recorded conversation that would occur naturally in a clinical or research context, and then on a scale from four to zero, rate the person speaking's strengths. So within the domains of speech and voice, as well as language and social pragmatics, as well as discourse, and the point or the purpose of that was to really anchor a person's communicative ability in one of these more natural environments with a provider. We collect so much phenomenal qualitative data, but at times it can feel challenging to quantify it and the hope with the PACT is that we can quantify our very real, possibly subjective evaluation of a person's communication at a certain moment in time. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, and what I love about that, and you might have a slightly different thought about this, because you're deeper into it, but from an assessment standpoint, you can then do that all the way through. You can say, "Here's where they are this year, here's where they are next year, here's where they are the year after that, or you know, two years ago, or whatever your lens is at that point." You can do that without kind of this constant repeating of, "Okay, let's see how bad you are today compared to a year ago, or compared to two years ago." Just a very different mindset. And I love the focus on "What can you still do? What what's working? And how can we leverage what's working to really help you to actually communicate today?" As opposed to saying, "Oh boy, the ship is sinking." which is kind of the typical approach. Jeanne Gallée: Yes, that exactly what you're saying. The tendency tends to focus on what's no longer there. And while that might be helpful in clinical trials to characterize a person's performance diagnostically and the trajectory of a diagnosis over time. It really does not serve the person who goes home after the assessment, nor their loved ones to help them maintain that autonomy and quality of life, and also caregiver burden. And that is actually one of the points I really love about the PACT, is it builds on that RAISE aspect, that final tenant of evolution or adaptation over time. There's no repeat measure conflict here, where you know something might seem familiar. One of the unique parts of the PACT is that the clinician doesn't fill out the scale while they're talking to the person, they're really just recording them talking, so it is on the clinician side where, as often as they'd like to, they could implement the structured prompts of the PACT and then fill out the scale and see how performance might vary over time. They might see effects of context of the conversation, or the environment, or maybe the time of day, you know, phase of life, but it remains a way to use that really important information you gather through these conversations without recreating a testing environment frequently. Jerry Hoepner: I really love that framework. I think there's a lot of room for that to be used in other contexts as well. I just think it's really a wise way of thinking about it. I also, you just mentioned caregivers and caregiver burden in this context, and how does that fit into this entire RAISE framework, the PACT, and so forth. Jeanne Gallée: I think for both the RAISE assessment framework as well as the PACT the carers play an essential role in the sense that if they are available and present in the patient's life, then they are involved in the process. And so within the RAISE framework, the care partner is involved to provide feedback or to be given feedback, and in the PACT the same occurs, where if they are present at the time of the conversation, they are involved in the conversation. What I tend to do in the people I have piloted the PACT, I say come in as you would naturally, but then also take a step back. Let the person that with PPA that we're talking to take the lead, but I want you to interact as you would naturally. And then they're separately also asked to comment on the strengths that the person with PPA has. Their feedback is so integral because if they are present in a person's life, they play an essential role in promoting anything that we do work on in speech therapy. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, yeah, really well said. And I wanted to dig in, partly because I have envy of this figure, the roadmap figure for PPA, and I think it really sets up well for as we think about professionals out there too, like what's the roadmap, not just for the person and their partner, but what's the roadmap for clinicians, future clinicians, all of that. Maybe you can talk a little bit about that figure. Jeanne Gallée: I'd be delighted to. So, this was one of those, I would say classic for me moments where I had an idea and went to PowerPoint and started playing around with a visual of what I was thinking. The roadmap paper in no way is meant to be the only guide for how we can work with a person with PPA, but was really born out of discussions with Amy Mooney, as well as Zoe Ezzes, and Kristin Schafferr Mendez through the National Aphasia Association about the possible gaps in education or preparation a person might experience when first working with people living with PPA.  There are so many ways in which we could say, "Oh, just work on this exact task. Work on these.." and that can feel so lost and unanchored, unmoored moreover. And I wanted to provide the clinical toolkit that I've been using to help me think about my broader approach. So to not get lost in the weeds, but just generally think about what's my purpose here, what's my journey, and so at the center of this road that I created is the tenant of providing that person-centered care, like we aim to with the RAISE assessment framework, so really bringing it back to establishing that honest and holistic and person-centered relationship with your client and their care partners. And focusing on creating a journey that's unique to the client that I think can feel hard when there are so many unknowns with a condition like PPA, where you're always working with an interdisciplinary team. Which you may or may not have contact with. So the first part of this roadmap is really defining your role. Who are you as a professional, and what kinds of support can you provide, and part of defining your own role includes defining your role relative to the rest of the interdisciplinary team. How can you provide a different approach from the neurologist or the neuropsychologist who play vital but very different roles in a person's care journey? Part of that definition also includes advocating across professions, so a classic conundrum that people with communication-led disorders face is that they may not have certain challenges in other domains, but their communication results in a domino effect of difficulties. And so, as the speech language pathologist, coming up with ways in which you can provide supports to other providers or your client to improve their communication can be essential for that comprehensive care. That might include coming up with a communication notebook that has a single page related to specific questions or common topics when talking to the neurologist or the physical therapist or other providers. And then part of this roadmap includes referring out. So having the humility and confidence to say I can't help with this in the ways that you may need. I will either refer you to a specialist within our field or outside of our field to help with these specific aspects, and I think that's just responsible care. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely. Really well described, and such a perfect. A segway to my next question. I always tell my students, assessment isn't just the first and last session that you're working with someone, and the same goes for intervention, right? It's not excluded from the beginning and the end, right? Like, you can't do intervention on day one, you can't do it on the last day, right? I think we kind of silo those things as well, you know, we assess and we intervene every day side by side. Can you share a little bit of your perspectives on this? And, and how that relates to kind of what we just talked about in terms of that roadmap? Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, I think part of the challenge with some of these concepts is that it's very helpful to have experience in working with individuals, whether it is through formal speech therapy or elsewhere, to feel comfort with the unknown. Because a lot of it relies on your ability to listen and to respond to what you notice. You may inadvertently put in assessment by asking follow-up questions to a point a person made when you were talking about their commute. Ad you may offer different technological supports or just visual supports to your client in that conversation in a way to build up supports to see, "Oh, do we see a difference in how they're responding to what I'm saying? And how I provide support? Or when I dial it back, do we see a completely different direction?" So, it is this beautiful, possibly more art than science approach of responding to what a person is giving you. And there are so many individual differences in all of us.  I always joke about how when I used to collect data on the picture description using both age match controls and people with PPA, I would almost burst out laughing when some of the controls provided responses, because I would get one to two sentences sometimes because see the difference in motivation. A person who does not have a communication concern, does not see the need to show exactly what they can do. And would benefit from some encouragement to show exactly how much they can say, whereas a person with PPA, who might have an Aphasia Quotient that recognizes their aphasia, might speak for five to 10 minutes to show exactly everything that they can accomplish. And so I think having that in your back pocket is really important when it comes to thinking about coming up with your recipe of all the ingredients of your assessment and intervention approach and counseling approach. So, I think that's where most of my work comes from, is that there is no one size fits all, but there are certain ingredients or components that we need to apply, and the exact ratios depend on the person you're working with. Jerry Hoepner: That is such a good description of dynamic assessment and intervention and how that I agree, probably more art than science. And that's hard for people who want a black and white answer, like "Step one…" but it's so true, and, and being effective in working in this context, that really moves us nicely into a recent paper that you did, those global perspectives on the management of PPA, and I was struck by the numbers here. Only 40% of respondents said that they had received training in primary progressive aphasia at their university, and they identified all of these needs, right, like online instruction, sample tools, and activity dealing with end of life care and trainings for end of life care. When you mentioned counseling, that totally relates to what we're up against in terms of counseling, right? No one feels confident or has very good self efficacy. Tey don't know if what you know the lines are, what part is theirs and what part is someone else. And I think just really important to like I said, lay out a roadmap and help people to understand what we were just talking about in terms of that art and science of how do you navigate this space when it has to be individualized for every person, and that can feel uncomfortable for a lot of people. So, I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on that, and kind of what you learned from that context. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, so this research study. Was really an amazing endeavor on part of everyone who was involved. It felt like a grassroots effort to find the speech language pathologists around the world who aren't associated with a particular institution who do work with primary progressive aphasia. So of course it will never be a fully representative sample of every clinician who does so, but I do think we worked very hard to cast a wide net. So we used a snowball method. I contacted almost 40 institutions and governing bodies to find speech language pathologists who do have experience with PPA, because while more and more non-specialist providers will be seeing this patient population, we wanted to hear from the people who currently are in the field and creating their own expertise and toolkits to work with these individuals. So, what we found is that a lot of people are out on their own creating their own wheels, so to speak. And it just really led to that beautiful conclusion of now with the power of our globalization of education and sharing of resources, we can come up with a resource that's shared worldwide. Of course, there will be adaptations to fit different contexts, cultures, languages, but one of the issues has been that the systems of care for PPA have often relied upon very specific individuals. And that's reflected in the educational level. Even I was in the master's program between 2017 and 2019, I didn't hear about PPA formally in my coursework, and if it was mentioned we did not go into any of these aspects of specialized care. Part of that might have been because I didn't take very specific courses that then you know were optional or precluded, so I might have missed it, but I really didn't receive that education in the classroom. I received it through my clinical training, which I would argue is possibly even more valuable, right? You have that experiential training. But I think for clinicians who might want to transition in their careers, or you know, inadvertently in their place of work, are transitioning based on who shows up, that is a huge disservice. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, agreed. And it's a complex issue, right, because I can remember actually teaching about this back before Tom [Sather] was in my department. I taught the aphasia class and the acquired cog class, and I was thinking, like, where do I talk about primary progressive aphasia? Do I talk about that in acquired com? Do I talk about that in aphasia? Do I do it in both? Where do I talk about end of life care, and like, how does that fit in, because that's, you know, at that point I was teaching dysphasia, too. Believe it or not, and I'm like, it's kind of there, it's kind of here, it's kind of, it's kind of in counseling, it's all right. So that makes it tricky to have kind of a uniform message when it's all over the place. And love to just get your thoughts on that too. Like, where do you put that stuff? Like, it's it's PPA, it's end of life care, it's aphasia, it's right, it's counseling, it's so many things at once. Jeanne Gallée: It is so many things at once, and I do think that speaks to the fact that it may well need its own class as part of progressive conditions. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah. Jeanne Gallée: But I do think a large part of what we share there is that understanding of we may also need to shift the identity of who we think about when we think about life care. And when we think about a progressive condition. Since a huge flavor, so to speak, of PPA is the fact that it is early onset, and especially with our cultural shifts, and you know, people starting families later in life. The face of a person with PPA looks very different from, at least in my childhood, of what looked like typical Alzheimer's disease dementia. And it's a younger, possibly more dynamic working person, possibly with little kids at home. And I think that's where that symptom-led approach has been most beneficial for my practice. Where we think about "What are you experiencing and how is it impacting your life?", rather than saying "This is the diagnosis, let's put you over here in this box." Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, the idea of putting it in a box and siloing things really resonates in this context, and I love what you said about identity, right? The identity - what we all have in our mind's eye when we think about end of life care is not the typical person with primary progressive aphasia. Like I can remember as an elementary school student visiting the nursing homes and singing to the residents and things like that, and this was not, this was not the group of people that we were thinking about in that context. Very, very different, and I just think that's a really good mindset shift to recognize how actually broad that is. I'm sure there's people listening to this who work in, you know, end of life pediatric care who want to slap me in the face right now, but right, we have such a different mindset when we're thinking about end of life care, and that reset that you just made super important. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, yeah, and easier said than done, I think, As well as just seeing who shows up to the University of Washington support groups, and just the own perspectives that individuals bring there. But I think we can do it. I think, as a field, that will be the way in which we can become the best generalist provider, so to speak, where we take general principles of addressing symptoms or situations, and then apply those to diagnoses across the spectrum. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, really well said, and a great place to kind of wrap up our questions, but I want to give you the opportunity, are there points that you want to share before we kind of close our conversation? Things that we missed. Jeanne Gallée: I think the general thread throughout our conversation has just spoken to the power we do have as providers or researchers working with patients with primary progressive aphasia or related conditions, I think when we feel that our expertise in the newest theories or approaches might be lacking, we can always rely upon our empathy and full body listening, just to bring in elements that go across the lifespan, and that in of itself can lead to so many honest and transparent choices in our clinical care that can best serve our communities. I think we are much more empowered than we think we are. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, that's a really important thread through many places where clinicians feel uncomfortable. They've got it there and they just have to gain that confidence, and being empowered to step into those moments. Well said. Well, Jeanne it's been just a really fun conversation. I'm sure we could talk all afternoon, but I look forward to catching up to you at future conferences and things like that. It's been my pleasure to have this conversation. So, thank you for being a part of it. Jeanne Gallée: Right back at you, Jerry. Thank you so much. This has been a really fun conversation, and like you said, I hope to meet in person in the near future. Jerry Hoepner: Agreed. On behalf of Aphasia Access, thank you for listening to this episode of the Aphasia Access Conversations Podcast. For more information on Aphasia Access, and to access our growing library of materials, please go to www.aphasiaaccess.org. If you have an idea for a future podcast series or topic, email us at info at aphasia access.org Thanks again for your ongoing support of Aphasia Access.   Resources and Readings 1) The RAISE Assessment Framework: Gallée, J., Cartwright, J., Volkmer, A., Whitworth, A., & Hersh, D. (2023). "Please Don't Assess Him to Destruction": The R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework for Primary Progressive Aphasia. American journal of speech-language pathology, 32(2), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00122  Gallée, J., Volkmer, A., Whitworth, A., Hersh, D., & Cartwright, J. (2024). Applications of the R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework to Support the Process of Assessment in Primary Progressive Aphasia. American journal of speech-language pathology, 33(5), 2280–2290. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00085 2) A roadmap for clinicians just starting to work with PPA: Gallée, J. (2023). A Roadmap to enhance care for people living with primary progressive Aphasia: What Can Be Done Now?. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 8(5), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_PERSP-23-0002  3) Aspects of language functioning in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia: Gallée, J., Gibbons, L. E., Choi, S. E., Lee, M., Scollard, P., Trittschuh, E. H., Mez, J., Saykin, A. J., Foldi, N. S., Mukherjee, S., & Crane, P. K. (2025). Facets of language performance in early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 21(9), e70705. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70705 4) The Progressive Aphasia Communication Toolkit (in production at Alzheimer's & Dementia, but here is the preprint): Gallée, J., Cartwright, J., Henry, M. L., Mooney, A. R., Stark, B. C., Volkmer, A., Dietz, A., Nakano, C., Battista, P., Beales, A., Beber, B. C., Cadório, I., Caldwell, M., Davies, K., Ezzes, Z., Gauch, M., Graney, T., Grobler, S., Haley, K. L., Hausmann, A., … Crane, P. K. (2025). The Progressive Aphasia Communication Toolkit (PACT): A Strengths-Based Approach to Multidomain Evaluation for Intervention. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025.11.25.25340904. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.11.25.25340904 5) A global survey on SLP perspectives on the management of PPA: Gallée, J., Cartwright, J., Grasso, S., Jokel, R., Lavoie, M., McGowan, E., Pozzebon, M., Beber, B. C., Duboisdindien, G., Montagut, N., Norvik, M., Sugimoto, T., Townsend, R., Unger, N., Winsnes, I. E., & Volkmer, A. (2024). Global perspectives on the management of primary progressive aphasia. Scientific reports, 14(1), 19712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70156-5 6) Aspects of language functioning in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia: Gallée, J., Gibbons, L. E., Choi, S. E., Lee, M., Scollard, P., Trittschuh, E. H., Mez, J., Saykin, A. J., Foldi, N. S., Mukherjee, S., & Crane, P. K. (2025). Facets of language performance in early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 21(9), e70705. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70705

Matthew Lavoie is a policy expert and political operative for some of Washington's most influential power brokers. He has spent his career evaluating the how and why of American political and cultural movements and observing some of the biggest shifts in American and geopolitical history. Visit his website at https://matthewlavoie.com/ Spies, Lies and Private Eyes is copyrighted by Authors on the Air Global Radio Network #authorsofinstagram #authorinterview #writingcommunity #authorsontheair#suspensebooks#authorssupportingauthors #thrillerbooks #suspense #wip#writers#writersinspiration #books#bookrecommendations #bookaddict #bookaddicted#bookaddiction #bibliophile #read#amreading #lovetoread #terrencemccauley#terrencemccauleybooks #bookouture #thrillers #TheTwilightTown #MatthewLavoie #MainStreetFringe

Matthew Lavoie is a policy expert and political operative for some of Washington's most influential power brokers. He has spent his career evaluating the how and why of American political and cultural movements and observing some of the biggest shifts in American and geopolitical history. Visit his website at https://matthewlavoie.com/ Spies, Lies and Private Eyes is copyrighted by Authors on the Air Global Radio Network #authorsofinstagram #authorinterview #writingcommunity #authorsontheair#suspensebooks#authorssupportingauthors #thrillerbooks #suspense #wip#writers#writersinspiration #books#bookrecommendations #bookaddict #bookaddicted#bookaddiction #bibliophile #read#amreading #lovetoread #terrencemccauley#terrencemccauleybooks #bookouture #thrillers #TheTwilightTown #MatthewLavoie #MainStreetFringe

Bienvenue sur le podcast Profit, Liberté, No Stress. Les 3 mots qui représentent le mieux mon « idéal business » et les stratégies que je mets en place pour vous permettre de l'atteindre. Se créer une activité qui rapporte vraiment, qui nous rend libre et avec laquelle nous sommes en paix : peu de stress, peu de contraintes.Envie de vivre de votre expertise ? Cliquez iciPour commander mon livre : Digital SelfmadeHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Le besoin de visibilité pousse les organisations à encourager la prise de parole de leurs équipes. Susciter un véritable engagement des collaborateurs demande de repenser le contrôle de cette parole interne. Cet équilibre délicat définit une pratique manégariale contemporaine.Dans cet épisode, Delphine Zanelli reçoit Charlène Hemery, experte en recrutement et développement de la marque employeur, pour la première partie de leur échange.Les directions souhaitent transformer leurs salariés en ambassadeurs. La peur de voir des messages non validés s'échapper fige souvent cette dynamique. Les entreprises rédigent des guides très précis pour encadrer la communication. Conséquence directe, les équipes n'osent plus s'exprimer par crainte de faire une erreur. Bâtir la confiance exige de fournir un cadre sécurisant tout en acceptant que les discours ne soient pas formatés au mot près. L'authenticité du terrain résonne toujours plus fort qu'une communication institutionnelle lissée. Le contrôle excessif de l'information génère de l'anxiété chez les salariés et bloque les initiatives.Cet épisode donne des éléments concrets pour structurer une démarche d'employés ambassadeurs pérenne. Il explique comment un manager peut encourager son équipe à s'exprimer sereinement. La méthode consiste en premier lieu à montrer l'exemple. Le leader publie lui-même du contenu pour rassurer ses collaborateurs. Il interagit avec leurs publications. Il fixe des limites claires et définit le terrain de jeu sans jamais imposer un texte strict. La transformation du management passe par cette capacité à lâcher prise sur la forme pour valoriser le fond. Un collaborateur qui prend la parole avec ses propres mots génère infiniment plus d'impact.L'analyse de Charlène Hemery s'appuie sur la création de toutes pièces d'un service de recrutement. Son regard confronte les discours théoriques à la réalité des opérations de terrain. Elle observe quotidiennement les craintes des directions face aux réseaux sociaux professionnels. Sa lecture permet de dépasser les blocages habituels.Cet épisode donne des éléments concrets pour organiser la communication de son équipe. Il permet de comprendre les mécanismes profonds de l'engagement des collaborateurs au quotidien. Les leaders trouvent des repères pour accompagner cette prise de parole. L'objectif est d'installer un climat de sécurité psychologique indispensable. Le futur du travail s'organise autour de ces nouveaux modes d'expression décentralisés.CHAPITRAGE :(00:00) Les défis du recrutement et de l'attractivité (04:30) La prise de parole des collaborateurs sur les réseaux (06:00) Les 3 actions concrètes pour encourager ses équipes (08:00) L'équilibre entre cadre sécurisant et liberté de ton (11:00) Le rôle clé de la posture du manager

La gestion des âges au travail soulève de nombreuses interrogations au sein des équipes. Construire un parcours manager solide nécessite de dépasser les clichés pour se concentrer sur la transmission réelle des compétences entre les collaborateurs.Dans cet épisode, Delphine Zanelli retrouve Charlène Hemery pour la seconde partie de leur échange.L'analyse de l'experte démonte l'illusion des fractures générationnelles. Les attentes de considération, d'impact et de sens restent partagées par tous les profils de l'entreprise. Le débat aborde directement la situation des profils expérimentés. La peur d'embaucher des personnes plus âgées bloque de nombreuses organisations. Les recruteurs privilégient souvent le clonage par réflexe de sécurité. Se priver de l'expérience des seniors représente une erreur stratégique majeure. L'apprentissage des nouveaux outils numériques peut s'organiser à tout âge si l'accompagnement est adapté.L'échange explore ensuite la réalité du passage à des fonctions de direction. Devenir responsable d'équipe demande d'acquérir une pratique manégariale totalement différente de l'expertise opérationnelle d'origine. Les meilleurs experts ne se transforment pas automatiquement en leaders naturels. Charlène Hemery partage sa propre évolution avec une grande lucidité. Elle revient sur l'absence de désir initial de diriger des personnes.Apprendre ce métier de manager implique d'accepter une part de vulnérabilité. Le développement des soft skills devient central pour accompagner les équipes avec justesse. Le manager doit renoncer à faire lui-même pour se concentrer sur le développement des autres. Cette transition provoque souvent des inconforts et des remises en question. Le dialogue met en lumière les étapes de cet apprentissage continu.Cet épisode donne des éléments concrets pour aborder la collaboration intergénérationnelle sereinement. Il permet de structurer son parcours manager avec recul. Il aide à identifier les compétences comportementales à développer en priorité. Le premier défi management consiste à accepter ses erreurs pour les transformer en leviers de progression avec son équipe.CHAPITRAGE :(00:00) Introduction de la seconde partie (03:30) Sortir des cases et des fractures générationnelles (07:00) La place des seniors et l'enjeu de la transmission (12:15) La formation aux nouveaux outils pour tous les âges (18:00) Construire son parcours manager sans l'avoir rêvé (21:30) L'importance de l'alignement personnel

durée : 00:07:24 - Le masque et la plume - par : Rebecca Manzoni - Après le choc de son premier roman, Gabriel Tallent revient avec l'amitié sauvage de deux ados liés par l'escalade extrême dans le désert. Si une partie du Masque a été séduite par la description des paysages et la force des personnages, l'autre déplore le jargon et la vulgarité de l'écriture. - équipe : Stéphane Le Guennec, Ilinca Negulesco - invités : Laurent Chalumeau Journaliste rock, scénariste, dialoguiste, romancier, Jean-Marc Proust Auteur et critique (Slate), Raphaëlle Leyris Journaliste au Monde, critique littéraire, Patricia Martin Journaliste et femme de radio française Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:49:15 - Le masque et la plume - par : Rebecca Manzoni - Cette semaine, le Masque s'attaque à cinq romans : le nouveau Salman Rushdie, "La Onzième Heure", le "Maypops" de Didier Decoin, "Viens Elie" de Jonas Sollberger, "Spécimen" de Pauline Clavière et "La Voie" de Gabriel Tallent. Verdicts contrastés au menu. - équipe : Stéphane Le Guennec, Ilinca Negulesco - invités : Raphaëlle Leyris Journaliste au Monde, critique littéraire, Laurent Chalumeau Journaliste rock, scénariste, dialoguiste, romancier, Jean-Marc Proust Auteur et critique (Slate), Patricia Martin Journaliste et femme de radio française Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Cette semaine à La vie sociale, on reçoit Maude Lavoie! Ancienne candidate d'Occupation Double, entrepreneure et maman du petit Jackson, Maude se confie à nous avec beaucoup de douceur et d'authenticité. Ensemble, on parle de l'amour qui évolue avec le temps, de la réalité de la parentalité, de la charge mentale, des amitiés qui nous accompagnent à travers les différentes étapes de la vie et de ce que signifie réellement être heureuse aujourd'hui. On revient aussi sur son parcours depuis OD, sur les souvenirs qui l'ont marquée, sur la femme qu'elle était à l'époque et celle qu'elle est devenue. Une discussion sincère sur les changements, les priorités qui se transforment et l'importance de se choisir. On espère que vous aimerez cette discussion autant que nous. Bonne écoute! @fizz_ca Fizz. Un fournisseur mobile et Internet nouveau genre qui permet à ses membres de personnaliser leurs forfaits grâce à une expérience entièrement en ligne. Dites adieu aux imprévus et aux frais cachés. Fizz préfère les choses simples et justes. Bienvenue ailleurs. @sushitaxi Si tu commandes toujours au même endroit parce que tu veux que ce soit bon à chaque fois, Sushi Taxi coche toutes les cases. Une marque d'ici, plus de 30 stations, et une qualité constante. Code VIESOCIALE pour 15 % de rabais. @matelasbonheur Matelas Bonheur fête ses 40 ans! Profitez de rabais allant jusqu'à 40% jusqu'au 6 juillet 2026.

durée : 00:59:21 - Etre et savoir - par : Louise Tourret - Apprentissage, épanouissement, sens du collectif : les mille bienfaits du chant choral pour les enfants et les adolescents. - équipe : Avril Ventura, François Richer - invités : Sofi Jeannin Cheffe principale des BBC Singers et Directrice musicale de la Maîtrise de Radio France (Stockholm, 1976-), Anthony Brault Psychologue clinicien, Maître de conférences en psychologie clinique et psychopathologie au département Études Psychanalytique de l'Université Paris Cité, Mathias Charton Chef de chœur et directeur artistique d'Acad'ÔChoeur, Inspecteur pédagogique régional d'éducation musicale et chant choral de l'académie de Poitiers Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Hasbro's CEO apparently has a lot of thoughts about D&D and how you should be playing the game. (Methinks maybe he should keep his mouth shut....). Also, there's a new survival horror game from the makers of Draw Steel, and Roll20 has a dungeon generator that ISNT AI! Plus, we've got Marc-André and Martin Lavoie, creators of the new board game “Questline” from Thunderworks Games! (https://thunderworksgames.com/products/questline-card-game)

Hasbro's CEO apparently has a lot of thoughts about D&D and how you should be playing the game. (Methinks maybe he should keep his mouth shut....). Also, there's a new survival horror game from the makers of Draw Steel, and Roll20 has a dungeon generator that ISNT AI! Plus, we've got Marc-André and Martin Lavoie, creators of the new board game “Questline” from Thunderworks Games! (https://thunderworksgames.com/products/questline-card-game)

Les journalistes et experts de RFI répondent également à vos questions sur l'entrée en Bourse de SpaceX, la suspension du procureur général de la CPI et des manifestations anti-immigration en Irlande du Nord. RDC : la voie vers une nouvelle Constitution est-elle désormais ouverte ?  En RDC, un texte central en cas de changement de la Constitution alors que le deuxième et dernier mandat du président Félix Tshisekedi expire en 2028. Que dit ce texte ? De quelle manière pourrait-il faciliter la modification de la Constitution ? Quelles sont les prochaines étapes en vue de la révision de la Constitution ?  Avec Paulina Zidi, correspondante permanente de RFI à Kinshasa.      SpaceX : pourquoi son entrée en Bourse est-elle déjà historique ?  75 milliards de dollars levés en une seule journée. Un record historique. Ce vendredi 12 juin 2026, SpaceX a signé la plus grande introduction en Bourse jamais réalisée. Le groupe d'Elon Musk, qui réunit les activités spatiales, le réseau satellitaire Starlink et ses projets dans l'intelligence artificielle, a fait une entrée fracassante à Wall Street. Mais au-delà du record financier, que change réellement l'arrivée de SpaceX en Bourse ? Avec Jeanne Bartoli, journaliste au service économie de RFI.     CPI : le procureur général sera-t-il révoqué ?  Karim Khan a été suspendu de ses fonctions de procureur de la Cour pénale internationale. Déjà mis en retrait depuis mai 2025, il fait l'objet d'accusations d'agression sexuelle formulées par un membre de son équipe, des faits qu'il conteste catégoriquement. Pourquoi cette suspension intervient-elle seulement maintenant, alors que l'affaire a éclaté fin 2024 ? Que sait-on réellement des accusations ? Avec Stéphanie Maupas, correspondante de RFI à La Haye.       Irlande du Nord : pourquoi cette flambée de violences anti-immigration ?  La semaine dernière, Belfast a été le théâtre de plusieurs nuits de violences visant des immigrés. Ces tensions ont éclaté après une attaque au couteau pour laquelle un réfugié soudanais a été inculpé. Plusieurs habitations occupées par des étrangers ont été incendiées, tandis que des familles ont été contraintes de quitter leur domicile en raison de leur origine. Comment expliquer cette vague cette violence anti-immigration ? Avec Alma-Pierre Bonnet, maître de conférences en Civilisation Britannique à l'université Lyon 3.  

Ce passage du Dhammapada expose le cœur de l'enseignement bouddhiste : la souffrance naît de l'attachement, du désir et de l'illusion d'un moi, et seule la pratique assidue du Noble Octuple Sentier permet d'en être libéré. Le Bouddha indique la voie, mais rappelle avec insistance que l'effort appartient à chacun — la contemplation, la maîtrise des pensées et des actes, et la vision claire de l'impermanence sont les seuls outils de la purification. Face à la certitude de la mort et à l'incertitude de toute chose, s'accrocher aux possessions, à la famille ou aux désirs sensuels ne fait qu'enchaîner davantage l'esprit. Le sage, lui, choisit dès maintenant de couper ces liens pour s'engager résolument sur la voie de la Libération.Bibliographie: "Les plus belles paroles du Bouddha" (https://www.babelio.com/livres/Schut-Les-plus-belles-paroles-du-Bouddha--Les-versets-d/574761)Narration et réalisation: Bruno LégerProduction: Les mécènes du Vieux SagePuisse la lumière des Maîtres toucher un nombre infini de cœurs,Puissent tous les êtres, visibles et invisibles, proches et lointains, humains et non humains, être libérés et heureux.OM Shanti, Shanti, Shanti.

Jean-François Poulin échange avec Gabriel Talbot-Lachance sur les projets de jumeaux numériques en santé développés au Qatar. En combinant données génétiques, dossiers médicaux, habitudes de vie et informations provenant d'objets connectés, ces modèles numériques permettent de prédire l'apparition de maladies ou de complications avant même les premiers symptômes. Le diabète sert actuellement de laboratoire d'expérimentation, avec des systèmes capables d'anticiper les risques et de recommander des interventions personnalisées en temps réel. Cette approche pourrait transformer la médecine en passant d'un modèle principalement curatif à une logique préventive et prédictive. Si les perspectives sont prometteuses, elles soulèvent également des questions importantes sur l'éthique, la confidentialité des données génétiques et l'acceptabilité sociale de telles pratiques.

REDIFF - À l'adolescence, pourquoi les petits-enfants prennent-ils parfois leurs distances avec leurs grands-parents ? Comment préserver le lien sans culpabiliser ni raviver la nostalgie de l'enfance ? Paul Delair et Caroline Dublanche apportent un éclairage précieux pour les familles confrontées à cette étape souvent douloureuse. Référence citée :- "Le psy-guide des grands-parents : aimer, soutenir et réconforter", Suzanne Vallières et Gabrielle Vallières-Lavoie, Éditions de l'Homme. Chaque soir, en direct, Caroline Dublanche accueille les auditeurs pour 2h30 d'échanges et de confidences. Pour participer, contactez l'émission au 09 69 39 10 11 (prix d'un appel local) ou sur parlonsnous@rtl.fr.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Laura Philippot, par ses soins, accompagne des hommes et des femmes en quête d'équilibre et d'harmonie. Son approche est originale. En associant le Shiatsu, l'astrologie, la thérapie par les sons et les bains de forêt, elle propose différentes pratiques apparemment éloignées les unes des autres, et qui forment avec elle un ensemble étonnant.Laura Philippot est une jeune femme qui puise avec talent dans les trésors des traditions anciennes, en les reliant au savoir contemporain. Surtout, elle est inspirée par un rapport profond, poétique et joyeux avec la nature, en particulier la forêt.Avec Laura Philippot, qui se dit elle-même de plus en plus reliée à la puissance de l'instant présent, nous sommes invités à la célébration de la vie dans son immédiateté, dans sa simplicité, et dans son évidente et merveilleuse sacralité : Ce qui est sacré n'est pas à aller chercher dans des limbes lointaines, mais en nous et autour de nous, ici et maintenant.  La terre où vit Laura Philippot, qui habite à Auray, est elle aussi merveilleusement habitée. Les forêts nombreuses aux arbres vénérables ; les étangs mystérieux où, depuis des millénaires et encore aujourd'hui, se réunissent des druides ; les constellations de sites mégalithiques incroyables – parmi lesquels les alignements immenses et si troublants de Carnac et d'Erdeven…La simplicité, l'évidence, l'harmonie et la merveille s'entrelacent et ne font qu'un : C'est l'unité du vivant et du divin qui, comme le dit Laura, se révèle à tous ceux qui suivent la voie du cœur.  Pour découvrir les activités de Laura Philippot, cliquer ici.Le compte Instagram de Laura Philippot : cliquer ici.--------------     NOS RÊVES ET NOS DÉSIRSDepuis quelques jours,  j'ai pris une nouvelle habitude. Je me suis rappelé la pratique évoquée récemment par Olivier Clerc (Zeteo #381).Le matin, avant de commencer toute activité, je m'écris une lettre. En quelques lignes, je commente, j'espère, je contemple les rêves et les désirs qui sont dans mon cœur.Les rêves et les désirs vraiment importants dans ma vie, en fait, il n'y en a pas beaucoup. Il n'y a même pas de quoi faire tous les doigts d'une seule main. Je les connais très bien, puisqu'ils sont les mêmes, ceux qui sont nés en moi il y a parfois de très longues années.En les écrivant ainsi dans cette lettre du matin, je les porte et je les caresse. Je tente aussi de les protéger contre mes habitudes les plus fréquentes et les plus faciles : celles du mental et des pensées toxiques. Combien de fois, plusieurs fois par jour, ne suis-je pas effectivement attaqué par la peur, le doute ou le découragement ?Ce qui est heureux et encourageant, en revanche, c'est de prendre conscience qu'avec la répétition de meilleures habitudes - quelques rituels quotidiens en fait - les mauvaises perdent en efficacité. Zeteo est un podcast consacré essentiellement à la spiritualité, et orienté vers la transcendance. Étonnamment, je crois de plus en plus qu'en moi, la transcendance, c'est l'élan que me donnent mes rêves et mes désirs. Je comprends aussi qu'elle est un mouvement qui, au lieu de m'envoyer vers un infini éternel tellement vaste que je pourrais m'y perdre des millions de fois, m'appelle plutôt à l'intérieur de moi.Cela n'efface aucunement toutes les beautés du monde, les trésors des sagesses et les sommets mystiques, ou les chefs d'œuvre artistiques. Tout cela, c'est pour cheminer vers l'intérieur de moi : je pense ici au Va Vers Toi d'Annick de Souzenelle.Rares sont les rêves et les désirs qui ne vont pas vers l'Autre. La transcendance qui m'appelle n'exclue pas les autres. Au contraire. En écartant les barreaux de ma prison intérieure, elle me libère formidablement, et me propulse vers l'Autre, et par effet papillon, vers tous les autres.Le combat est parfois difficile, mais je ne me sens pas seul. Mes rêves et mes désirs, je les confie à mon ange, qui les connaît si bien. Je me demande d'ailleurs parfois s'ils ne m'ont pas été murmurés de sa voix.Et, quand mes attentes sont liées à des personnes en particulier, ce qui est toujours le cas chez moi, je les confie aussi aux anges qui veillent sur elles. Ma joie de diffuser aujourd'hui la rencontre avec Laura Philippot est profonde, parce que cette jeune femme nous relie avec grâce à la voie de notre cœur, là où vivent et espèrent nos rêves et nos désirs.Et vous, vos rêves et vos désirs, comment entretenez-vous leur flamme ?--------------    Pour soutenir l'effort de Zeteo, podcast sans publicité et d'accès entièrement gratuit, vous pouvez faire un don. Il suffit pour cela de cliquer sur l'un des deux boutons ci-dessous, pour le paiement de dons en ligne au profit de l'association Telio qui gère Zeteo.Cliquer ici pour aller sur notre compte de paiement de dons en ligne sécurisé par HelloAsso.Ou cliquer ici pour aller sur notre compte Paypal.Vos dons sont défiscalisables à hauteur de 66% : par exemple, un don de 50€ ne coûte en réalité que 17€. Le reçu fiscal est généré automatiquement et immédiatement à tous ceux qui passent par la plateforme de paiement sécurisé en ligne de HelloAssoNous délivrons directement un reçu fiscal à tous ceux qui effectuent un paiement autrement (Paypal, chèque à l'association Telio, 76 rue de la Pompe, 75016 Paris – virement : nous écrire à info@zeteo.fr ).  Pour lire d'autres messages de nos auditeurs : cliquer ici.Pour en savoir plus au sujet de Zeteo, cliquer ici.Pour lire les messages de nos auditeurs, cliquer ici.Nous contacter : contact@zeteo.frProposer votre témoignage ou celui d'un proche : temoignage@zeteo.fr

10 jours après son investiture, le nouveau président béninois Romuald Wadagni effectue sa première tournée ouest-africaine avec deux étapes remarquées : le Niger et le Burkina Faso. Après trois ans de tensions, se dirige-t-on vers un réchauffement des relations entre le Bénin et l'AES ? Comment rétablir la confiance entre les pays voisins ?  Standard : +33 9 693 693 70 Mail : appels.actu@rfi.fr Facebook : Appels sur l'actualité - RFI Twitter : @appelsactu

durée : 00:38:08 - Le 18/20 : un jour dans le monde - par : Fabienne Sintes - L'Union européenne s'est accordée sur un nouveau “règlement retours”, qui autorise notamment la création de centres dans des pays tiers pour certains migrants en situation irrégulière. Un texte qui confirme le durcissement de la politique migratoire européenne. - réalisation : Philippe Lefébure, Nathalie Poitevin, Thomas Lenglain, Mathias Dubois - invités : Fabienne Keller Eurodéputée Renew Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:38:08 - InterNational - par : Fabienne Sintes - L'Union européenne s'est accordée sur un nouveau “règlement retours”, qui autorise notamment la création de centres dans des pays tiers pour certains migrants en situation irrégulière. Un texte qui confirme le durcissement de la politique migratoire européenne. - réalisation : Philippe Lefébure, Nathalie Poitevin, Thomas Lenglain, Mathias Dubois - invités : Fabienne Keller Eurodéputée Renew Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Elle s'est affranchie du parti présidentiel en créant son propre mouvement et veut peser dans le débat pour 2027 en faisant émerger une candidature au centre. L'ancienne Première ministre Elisabeth Borne est l'invitée de RTL Matin. Ecoutez L'invité RTL de 7h40 avec Thomas Sotto du 01 juin 2026.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

En hommage à Edgar Morin je rediffuse un épisode #inspiration enregistré en janvier 2024 : Regard sur notre époque complexe, par Edgar Morin Edgar Morin est un précurseur et un vulgarisateur de premier plan en ce qui concerne les concepts d'organisation, de système et de complexité.Il est considéré comme l'une des figures intellectuelles les plus importantes du 20e siècle en France et a influencé de nombreux domaines de la pensée contemporaine.Dans ce court épisode, je lis sa dernière chronique publiée dans le journal Le Monde ce lundi 22 janvier, ainsi que deux passages de son livre "La Voie".« À force de sacrifier l'essentiel pour l'urgence, on finit par oublier l'urgence de l'essentiel. » - Edgar Morin----Retrouvez tous les épisodes et les résumés sur www.sismique.frSismique est un podcast indépendant créé et animé par Julien Devaureix.

durée : 00:28:24 - Les émissions culturelles de France Culture - par : Marie Labory - Après un premier roman à succès aussi sombre que sublime - "My Absolute Darling" en 2017 -, l'écrivain américain Gabriel Tallent revient à la lumière avec "La Voie", un récit d'amitié qui dit l'espoir et la liberté. - réalisation : Hélène Trigueros, Boris Pineau, Aïssatou N'Doye, Jules Barbier, Zohra Vignais, Lise Ripoche, Mathi Adjinsoff - invités : Gabriel Tallent Ecrivain Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:20:23 - Le journal de 18h00 - Vers le retour des ZFE. Le Conseil constitutionnel censure l'amendement qui avait supprimé les zones à faibles émissions, destinées à éloigner les véhicules polluants des grandes agglomérations. Pour les Sages, il s'agit d'un "cavalier législatif" sans rapport avec la loi de simplification. - réalisation : La Rédaction de France Culture, Stanislas Vasak, Alison Vicrobeck Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:20:23 - Les journaux de France Culture - Vers le retour des ZFE. Le Conseil constitutionnel censure l'amendement qui avait supprimé les zones à faibles émissions, destinées à éloigner les véhicules polluants des grandes agglomérations. Pour les Sages, il s'agit d'un "cavalier législatif" sans rapport avec la loi de simplification. - réalisation : La Rédaction de France Culture, Stanislas Vasak, Alison Vicrobeck Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

In this episode of the Radical Radiance Podcast, our host Rebecca George is joined by her friend Liz Lavoie to share her personal journey of decluttering her home and heart, exploring how discontentment shows up and how decluttering can lead to spiritual and emotional peace. Discover practical steps to start decluttering today and learn how biblical principles can transform your life. Keywords:decluttering, spiritual growth, emotional health, minimalism, Christian living, peace, joy, discontentment, home organization, mental clarityTakeaways:Decluttering is a spiritual practice that reflects our inner life.Start small: clear off surfaces and tackle visual clutter first.Timing your chores can reduce overwhelm and increase motivation.Biblical contentment is found in trusting God.Letting go of possessions can help release emotional baggage.Chapters00:00 Introduction to Radical Radiance Podcast03:57 The Journey of Decluttering Discontent08:36 Understanding Clutter and Its Impact16:09 Practical Steps to Declutter Your Life22:16 Managing Overwhelm: Practical Tidying Tips26:34 Decluttering with Purpose: Emotional Attachments and Letting Go36:33 Finding Contentment: A Heart-Centered Approach to Decluttering41:21 Radiance in Grief: Finding Joy Through ChristDeclutter Discontent Website - https://declutterdiscontent.comSponsors:Christian Theology Handbook: You can check out the CSB Christian Theology Handbook by ⁠clicking here.⁠Life Counsel Bible: You can check out the CSB Life Counsel Bible by ⁠clicking here.⁠Previnex: Check out Sleep Health PLUS and get 15% (code REBECCA15) off your first order by clicking here.Live Oak Integrative Health: If you're ready to feel like yourself again, head to ⁠liveoakintegrativehealth.com/radiance⁠ to learn more, receive a discount on service packages, and get started with Live Oak Integrative Health today.Comfy Earrings: If you're tired of earrings that look good but don't feel good, you have to try Comfy Earrings. ⁠Check them out here!⁠Links:Speaking: ⁠https://www.radicalradiance.live/speaking⁠ Creative Business Coaching: ⁠https://www.radicalradiance.live/coaching⁠ Camp for Creatives: ⁠https://www.radicalradiance.live/campforcreatives⁠ Listen to Radical Radiance on Apple Podcasts: ⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/radical-radiance/id1484726102?uo=4⁠ Listen to Radical Radiance on Spotify: ⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/55N56VtU6q33ztgJNw7oTX?si=29648982bc91475f⁠ Take the FREE Waiting Personality Quiz: ⁠https://www.tryinteract.com/share/quiz/676d5c2884dd1e00159563f6⁠ Take the Why Are You Stuck in Your Calling? Quiz: ⁠https://www.tryinteract.com/share/quiz/657326e6544f610014b40b67⁠ Books:You're Not Too Late: Trusting God's Timing in a Hurry-Up World: ⁠https://amzn.to/44omO3k⁠Do the Thing: Gospel-Centered Goals, Gumption, and Grace for the Go-Getter Girl: ⁠https://amzn.to/43IaFpM⁠ Before Dawn: Knowing God's Presence in the Dark Seasons of Life: ⁠https://amzn.to/4pdsZjv⁠

The Rebel News podcasts features free audio-only versions of select RebelNews+ content and other Rebel News long-form videos, livestreams, and interviews. Monday to Friday enjoy the audio version of Ezra Levant's daily TV-style show, The Ezra Levant Show, where Ezra gives you his contrarian and conservative take on free speech, politics, and foreign policy through in-depth commentary and interviews. Wednesday evenings you can listen to the audio version of The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid the Chief Reporter of Rebel News. Sheila brings a western sensibility to Canadian news. With one foot in the oil patch and one foot in agriculture, Sheila challenges mainstream media narratives and stands up for Albertans. If you want to watch the video versions of these podcasts, make sure to begin your free RebelNewsPlus trial by subscribing at http://www.RebelNewsPlus.com

Pour écouter l'émission en une fois, sans pub, et profiter du Bonus : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo 6/6 - Stonehenge : temple sacré ou machine du temps ?Pourquoi Stonehenge a-t-il été construit avec une telle précision ?Simple lieu de culte, centre de guérison… ou véritable instrument pour comprendre le ciel ?Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons au cœur de l'un des plus grands mystères de l'histoire. À partir des découvertes archéologiques et des recherches sur l'astronomie préhistorique, nous explorons une hypothèse fascinante : Stonehenge aurait été bien plus qu'un sanctuaire.Alignements solaires, cycles lunaires, calcul des éclipses, géométrie sacrée… les bâtisseurs semblent avoir conçu un système complexe capable de mesurer le temps, d'organiser les saisons et peut-être même de prévoir l'avenir.Mais derrière cette maîtrise du cosmos se cache un enjeu fondamental : le pouvoir.Car dans ces sociétés anciennes, comprendre le ciel, c'est aussi dominer les hommes.Alors, Stonehenge était-il un temple, un calendrier… ou une machine destinée à asseoir une autorité ?Un voyage captivant entre archéologie, astronomie et croyances, à la frontière entre science et mystère. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Pour écouter l'émission en une fois, sans pub, et profiter du Bonus : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo 5/6 - Stonehenge : temple sacré ou machine du temps ?Pourquoi Stonehenge a-t-il été construit avec une telle précision ?Simple lieu de culte, centre de guérison… ou véritable instrument pour comprendre le ciel ?Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons au cœur de l'un des plus grands mystères de l'histoire. À partir des découvertes archéologiques et des recherches sur l'astronomie préhistorique, nous explorons une hypothèse fascinante : Stonehenge aurait été bien plus qu'un sanctuaire.Alignements solaires, cycles lunaires, calcul des éclipses, géométrie sacrée… les bâtisseurs semblent avoir conçu un système complexe capable de mesurer le temps, d'organiser les saisons et peut-être même de prévoir l'avenir.Mais derrière cette maîtrise du cosmos se cache un enjeu fondamental : le pouvoir.Car dans ces sociétés anciennes, comprendre le ciel, c'est aussi dominer les hommes.Alors, Stonehenge était-il un temple, un calendrier… ou une machine destinée à asseoir une autorité ?Un voyage captivant entre archéologie, astronomie et croyances, à la frontière entre science et mystère. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

À l'adolescence, pourquoi les petits-enfants prennent-ils parfois leurs distances avec leurs grands-parents ? Comment préserver le lien sans culpabiliser ni raviver la nostalgie de l'enfance ? Paul Delair et Caroline Dublanche apportent un éclairage précieux pour les familles confrontées à cette étape souvent douloureuse. Référence citée :- "Le psy-guide des grands-parents : aimer, soutenir et réconforter", Suzanne Vallières et Gabrielle Vallières-Lavoie, Éditions de l'Homme. Chaque soir, en direct, Caroline Dublanche accueille les auditeurs pour 2h30 d'échanges et de confidences. Pour participer, contactez l'émission au 09 69 39 10 11 (prix d'un appel local) ou sur parlonsnous@rtl.fr.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Pour écouter l'émission en une fois, sans pub, et profiter du Bonus : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo 4/6 - Stonehenge : temple sacré ou machine du temps ?Pourquoi Stonehenge a-t-il été construit avec une telle précision ?Simple lieu de culte, centre de guérison… ou véritable instrument pour comprendre le ciel ?Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons au cœur de l'un des plus grands mystères de l'histoire. À partir des découvertes archéologiques et des recherches sur l'astronomie préhistorique, nous explorons une hypothèse fascinante : Stonehenge aurait été bien plus qu'un sanctuaire.Alignements solaires, cycles lunaires, calcul des éclipses, géométrie sacrée… les bâtisseurs semblent avoir conçu un système complexe capable de mesurer le temps, d'organiser les saisons et peut-être même de prévoir l'avenir.Mais derrière cette maîtrise du cosmos se cache un enjeu fondamental : le pouvoir.Car dans ces sociétés anciennes, comprendre le ciel, c'est aussi dominer les hommes.Alors, Stonehenge était-il un temple, un calendrier… ou une machine destinée à asseoir une autorité ?Un voyage captivant entre archéologie, astronomie et croyances, à la frontière entre science et mystère. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Pour écouter l'émission en une fois, sans pub, et profiter du Bonus : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo 3/6 - Stonehenge : temple sacré ou machine du temps ?Pourquoi Stonehenge a-t-il été construit avec une telle précision ?Simple lieu de culte, centre de guérison… ou véritable instrument pour comprendre le ciel ?Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons au cœur de l'un des plus grands mystères de l'histoire. À partir des découvertes archéologiques et des recherches sur l'astronomie préhistorique, nous explorons une hypothèse fascinante : Stonehenge aurait été bien plus qu'un sanctuaire.Alignements solaires, cycles lunaires, calcul des éclipses, géométrie sacrée… les bâtisseurs semblent avoir conçu un système complexe capable de mesurer le temps, d'organiser les saisons et peut-être même de prévoir l'avenir.Mais derrière cette maîtrise du cosmos se cache un enjeu fondamental : le pouvoir.Car dans ces sociétés anciennes, comprendre le ciel, c'est aussi dominer les hommes.Alors, Stonehenge était-il un temple, un calendrier… ou une machine destinée à asseoir une autorité ?Un voyage captivant entre archéologie, astronomie et croyances, à la frontière entre science et mystère. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Pour écouter l'émission en une fois, sans pub, et profiter du Bonus : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo 2/6 - Stonehenge : temple sacré ou machine du temps ?Pourquoi Stonehenge a-t-il été construit avec une telle précision ?Simple lieu de culte, centre de guérison… ou véritable instrument pour comprendre le ciel ?Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons au cœur de l'un des plus grands mystères de l'histoire. À partir des découvertes archéologiques et des recherches sur l'astronomie préhistorique, nous explorons une hypothèse fascinante : Stonehenge aurait été bien plus qu'un sanctuaire.Alignements solaires, cycles lunaires, calcul des éclipses, géométrie sacrée… les bâtisseurs semblent avoir conçu un système complexe capable de mesurer le temps, d'organiser les saisons et peut-être même de prévoir l'avenir.Mais derrière cette maîtrise du cosmos se cache un enjeu fondamental : le pouvoir.Car dans ces sociétés anciennes, comprendre le ciel, c'est aussi dominer les hommes.Alors, Stonehenge était-il un temple, un calendrier… ou une machine destinée à asseoir une autorité ?Un voyage captivant entre archéologie, astronomie et croyances, à la frontière entre science et mystère. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Pour écouter l'émission en une seule fois et profiter du Bonus :https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo 1/6 - Stonehenge : temple sacré ou machine du temps ?Pourquoi Stonehenge a-t-il été construit avec une telle précision ?Simple lieu de culte, centre de guérison… ou véritable instrument pour comprendre le ciel ?Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons au cœur de l'un des plus grands mystères de l'histoire. À partir des découvertes archéologiques et des recherches sur l'astronomie préhistorique, nous explorons une hypothèse fascinante : Stonehenge aurait été bien plus qu'un sanctuaire.Alignements solaires, cycles lunaires, calcul des éclipses, géométrie sacrée… les bâtisseurs semblent avoir conçu un système complexe capable de mesurer le temps, d'organiser les saisons et peut-être même de prévoir l'avenir.Mais derrière cette maîtrise du cosmos se cache un enjeu fondamental : le pouvoir.Car dans ces sociétés anciennes, comprendre le ciel, c'est aussi dominer les hommes.Alors, Stonehenge était-il un temple, un calendrier… ou une machine destinée à asseoir une autorité ?Un voyage captivant entre archéologie, astronomie et croyances, à la frontière entre science et mystère. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:20:09 - Le journal de 18h00 - Les diplomates à la manœuvre pour mettre un terme à la guerre au Moyen-Orient. Les négociations s'accélèrent entre les Américains et les Iraniens alors que Donald Trump a suspendu l'opération navale américaine dans le golfe Persique. - réalisation : La Rédaction de France Culture, Stanislas Vasak, Brice Garcia Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:20:09 - Journal de 18h - Les diplomates à la manœuvre pour mettre un terme à la guerre au Moyen-Orient. Les négociations s'accélèrent entre les Américains et les Iraniens alors que Donald Trump a suspendu l'opération navale américaine dans le golfe Persique.

What if decluttering your home is the first step toward real, lasting peace?In this episode, Jess sits down with Liz LaVoie to talk about the powerful connection between our homes and our hearts, and how decluttering both can lead us to true, lasting peace.This isn't about becoming a minimalist. It's about becoming content.Let's go. Don't Miss:The UCLA Study Guide on clutter and stress levels mentioned in today's episode.Grab Jess's favorite bedding and loungewear from Cozy Earth. Head to cozyearth.com and use the code JESS for up to 20% off! And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, make sure to let them know you heard about Cozy Earth here.Preorder Jess's Book: You Can't Be Brave Until You're ScaredJoin us at Brave 2026! A two-day gathering for Kingdom women in Charleston, SC Grab your ticket!Join Liz's Declutter Discontent Course! Connect with Liz! Explore her resources, YouTube, and email newsletter.

Glenn discusses the worsening trend among politicians to run on arresting their political opponents. When politicians continue to run on jailing their opponents, it opens the door for a true authoritarian to gain power. BlazeTV host of "The Liz Wheeler Show" Liz Wheeler joins to discuss the recent testimony given before Congress by Attorney General Pam Bondi over the government's handling of the Epstein files. Juno News managing editor Cosmin Dzsurdzsa joins to discuss what is being described as one of the deadliest mass shootings that has happened in recent history, which occurred in Canada. Glenn and Cosmin also discuss the downfall of Canada as progressivism has taken over the country. Rebel News reporter Alexandra Lavoie joins to share what she saw when she went under cover in Cuba. Glenn discusses the latest updates in the Fulton County, Georgia, election fraud investigation. Glenn discusses how the founding fathers might have handled the decision to regulate a technology that could disrupt society, such as AI. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices