Podcasts about Jiddu Krishnamurti

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 14 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Krishna Murthy lonely journey started Rajagopal, Rosalind to assist JK World Tours continued as usual Anne Besant and Lead Beater Last days Some incidents happened in 1930, 1931, 1932 and 1933 మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 15 వ భాగంలో.

Last 4 days before regular tickets sell out at AI Engineer World's Fair - this is the single biggest gathering of AI Engineers, Founders, Leaders, and Researchers in the world. Attendees get >$5000 worth of sponsor credits and talk tracks are looking FANTASTIC. Join us!The AI scaling debate always focuses on the question of “how do we get more GPUs?” but the better question may be: how do we make the most of ones we already have.The fact that a frontier lab like xAI could be running at sub-10% MFU (Model FLOPs Utilization) is just a hint at what the real problem may be.For context, older frontier-scale training runs were already much higher than 10%. GPT-3 was around 21% MFU. Gopher was around 32%. Megatron-Turing NLG was around 30%. PaLM reached around 46%. And our guest Anjney says best-in-class MFU today is closer to 60–70%.It's not necessarily that xAI is uniquely incompetent (it's clear they have talented folks) but rather the priorities may be flipped in the GPU arms race.While GPU access is a bottleneck, simply increasing CapEx won't automatically translate to better models as frontier AI is increasingly a systems problem: scheduling, utilization, networking, kernels, frameworks, data pipelines, parallelism, cluster reliability, and the thousand small decisions that determine whether your theoretical FLOPs become real training progress.From building Discord's developer platform and backing frontier AI companies like Anthropic, Mistral, Black Forest Labs, and Periodic Labs to now building AMP's independent compute grid, Anjney Midha has spent years close to the real bottlenecks of AI scaling. In this episode, Anjney joins swyx at Periodic Labs to unpack why the AI race is not just about buying more GPUs, why 95% utilization would have been considered an outage at Google, and why the next era of AI infrastructure has to be more aligned, more efficient, and more responsible.We go deep on AMP's vision for a compute grid that makes FLOPs flow like megawatts, the difference between full-stack AI labs and horizontal pooling, why AI data centers need community buy-in, and how compute markets could evolve into something closer to an independent system operator. Anjney also explains why DeepMind's unpublished research points to a market failure, why end-of-life prediction remains one of the most important AI applications he has thought about for fourteen years, and why “output maxing” may become a new discipline for frontier systems.We also discuss Anthropic's culture, why “luck favors the prepared mind” in coding models, how Claude cracked coding, why too much capital too early can make AI labs fragile, what Periodic Labs is trying to do with science and superconductors, why great researchers can become great CEOs, and why Silicon Valley is both deeply missionary and deeply mercenary.We discuss:* Why 95% utilization was considered an outage at Google* Why AI infrastructure waste compounds at frontier-lab scale* Why “move fast and break things” does not work for AI data centers* How data center backlash, power grids, and community incentives shape AI scaling* AMP's vision for making FLOPs flow like megawatts* Why compute needs an independent system operator* How interruptible demand and dynamic prioritization worked inside Google* Why DeepMind research hoarding creates negative externalities* AMP's 1.2GW base-load ambition and the need for 6GW of spike capacity* Why end-of-life prediction could become one of AI's most important healthcare applications* Frontier Systems, output maxing, and full-stack alignment* Why APIs and abstraction layers become lossy as organizations scale* Superconductors, standards, and the dream of lossless systems* SF Compute, open protocols, and the future of compute marketplaces* Why non-NVIDIA chips can still benefit from NVIDIA's reference architecture* Trust boundaries and why chip startups need visibility into future model architectures* Why VCs often underestimate researchers as CEOs* Scientists as star athletes of the mind* Why great CEOs need to be confrontational up and down the stack* Why leading the frontier matters more than “winning”* How Anthropic cracked coding* Why culture is fragile, not a permanent moat* Why hardship was a feature, not a bug, for Anthropic* Why Anthropic's P0 was coding from day one* Periodic Labs, physics as the constraint, and technical reality* Silicon Valley mercenaries, missionary teams, and what happens after a breakthroughAnjney Midha* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anjney* X: https://x.com/AnjneyMidhaAMP PBC* Website: https://amppublic.com/* X: https://x.com/amppublicTimestamps00:00:00 Introduction00:00:09 Why AI Compute Is Being Wasted00:03:17 Responsible Infrastructure and Data Center Backlash00:06:07 AMP Grid: Making FLOPs Flow Like Megawatts00:12:41 Foundry, Frontier Labs, and Research Hoarding00:14:42 Gigawatt-Scale Compute and End-of-Life Prediction00:24:08 Frontier Systems, Output Maxing, and Alignment00:27:38 Compute Markets, SF Compute, and Non-NVIDIA Chips00:32:57 Trust Boundaries, Co-Design, and Researcher CEOs00:38:17 AI Coachella and First-Principles Thinking00:42:43 Leading vs Winning in Frontier AI00:45:54 How Anthropic Cracked Coding00:48:25 Culture, Hardship, and Anthropic's P000:54:03 Periodic Labs, Physics, and Silicon Valley Mercenaries00:56:26 Rishi Valley, Singapore, and Money as a Measure00:58:47 Closing ThoughtsTranscriptIntroduction: Anjney Midha, AMP, and Compute WasteSwyx [00:00:00]: We're in Periodic Labs with Anjney Midha, CEO, founder of AMP. Welcome.Compute Utilization: Node Allocation, MFU, and AlignmentAnjney [00:00:09]: Thanks for having me. At Google, there are two types of utilization usually, right? That you're measuring in these clusters. One is node allocation, and then the other's MFU. Node utilization is usually like what percentage of cards in the data center are just, used, and that, if it's not at, 95%-Swyx [00:00:29]: There is no excuseAnjney [00:00:29]: There's no excuse, right? I think 95% at Google, which is where my co-founder, Seb, came from, he built the Borg, PBorg/GQM scheduler at Google, and there I think 95% was considered an outage, so 96% node utilization is, should be standard. And most single-tenant clusters are not running at that. So that's one. And then MFU should be, I would say the best in class today is somewhere between 60 and 70%. I think this is a leadership question, right? Fundamentally it's an alignment question, which is are the people who are funding the cluster and then deploying the cluster actually aligned? And sometimes theoretically they are, but in practice the number of people in the chain, the supply chain between, the capital and all the way to whoever's managing the cluster and then whoever's measuring what the output is, are just so many, degrees of separation away that, the, The Have you ever heard the radian metaphor, which is at the beginning of an arc, if you have two arcs that are two lines that are just off by a few degrees, that-Swyx [00:01:33]: It spreads outAnjney [00:01:34]: It spreads out, right? Or at scale. And I think what's happening is a lot of cluster implementations and infrastructure, a lot of frontier labs and other teams, that's what's happening, is they're, they initialize the plan, which is kind of like North Star with a team that wants to do good, but then they're, required to scale so fast instead of iteratively that the wastage just compounds really fast at scale. And so I think we know the answer, which is just do iterative bring ups. If you spend time with people who've been in the semiconductor industry or the DSN industry for a long time, this is not new, and I don't think AI should be an excuse. Sure. Something What is new? Okay. We have a lot of new capabilities, but that doesn't mean just abandon common sense. Common sense should always be in fashion. ? AI scaling doesn't change the in fact, if anything, AI scaling should be putting a premium on the value of common sense and infrastructure because the margin of error now is so much lower and the costs of wastage are so much higher. And the cost of wastage, by the way, is not just economic. I'm, obviously I'm, I'm an investor, or I'm an investor by background. Over the last few years now we're running an AI infrastructure business called, AMP. And I think that it's okay to say this time is different on the capabilities front. We are genuinely getting capabilities at, of the, of a kind we haven't had before. That doesn't give you an excuse to say this time is different for everything, especially infrastructure. So look, I love the hacker mindset and the hustler mindset. Now, that's great for the startup mindset, but you remember this moment where Zuck went from saying, “Move fast, break things” to, move-Responsible Infrastructure and Data Center BacklashSwyx [00:03:10]: Fast and stable infrastructureAnjney [00:03:11]: Move fast with stable infrastructure. I think now we need to move fast with, responsible infrastructure. People are going to ask where the impact is. There was a really In our class yesterday, Scott Nolan, who's the founder of General Matter, came by at Stanford to speak about energy bottlenecks. And he had a phenomenal idea. He said, “if you look at the marginal unit economics of compute per hour,” he goes, “let's call it, $4 an hour. If you're having to bring up a new data center in a new community, why not just say we're going to charge 4.50 an hour, and that marginal impact or that marginal increase, we just literally take that and give it to the local community as cash?” I can tell you as a customer of that compute, I would love that. I'd be happy to pay an additional 50 cents per hour at scale.Swyx [00:03:57]: Wow. Yeah.Anjney [00:03:58]: Because if that means the public benefit is so clear to the communities that the data centers are coming up in, I'm going to feel like that compute is much more reliable. Up to 20% of all data centers this year in the US, my understanding is are at risk.Swyx [00:04:13]: Of community backlash?Anjney [00:04:14]: Correct. Of not getting the community support they need to get brought up.Swyx [00:04:19]: Wow. That's a huge number.Anjney [00:04:20]: Yeah. Now, we, I think we should dig into what that number is. I think it's a little bit of overstated. These things can get over-reported, but it-Swyx [00:04:27]: They don't just care about jobs. They care about all the other stuff around it, right? They care about power grid, they care about environments-Anjney [00:04:33]: Power grid, permitting, and so on. And imagine I think if you said there's a new AI deal. If we're bringing up a data center in your community, we're actually going to reduce the cost of your electricity bill. Okay, now we're talking. Right? The community's going, “Okay. Now this is a deal. I feel like a partner in this.” Right now that's not happening. There will be audits, there will be investigations, and when the, when the regulators come, I don't know when it's going to be, the folks who are moving fast and breaking things in the name of AI progress better be prepared. That's certainly not how we're procuring compute. Or we're, we're trying as much as we can to work with partners who have long-term track records. Many of whom, by the way, are not, AI providers. I think this whole idea of neoclouds being somehow this new category is a lot of marketing speak. There are really good, reliable, trusted data center providers in America who've been around 20 plus years. I love those folks. They know how to Sure. Are they sponsoring happy hours at NeurIPS? No. Are they legibly listed in Build? No. Are they hanging out in my, in, situational awareness parties? No. But they're adults. I trust them.Swyx [00:05:44]: They can run LAN. They can run power.Anjney [00:05:45]: They can run LAN, power, and shell. They have credit histories. We sit down, we have a conversations. Many of them live in Silicon Valley. They've, they've had to deal with the boom and bust cycles of the internet, and I love those folks. They are stable infrastructure partners and thinkers. And I think there's a lot of short-term thinking going on in the compute layer, and it's going to catch up to us. It's not going to be good.AMP Grid: Making FLOPs Flow Like MegawattsSwyx [00:06:07]: You talk about aligning incentives, and, I would think that aligning incentives means you have the full stack in one company, which is xAI and OpenAI, right? So you as a standalone infrastructure layer, why are you somehow more aligned to your portfolio companies than people who just own the whole thing?Anjney [00:06:28]: In systems design, right, there's, there's two regimes of, architecture, right? You have integration, and then you have pooling and utilization, right? So the Or rather, the way to increase utilization often is you can do systems integration where you collapse a lot of process into one node, or you can pull out a process from a node and share that amongst various That resource amongst several different nodes. And so we see the AMP grid, which is, the, what, the system we're building here, which is basically a compute grid. We're trying to do for compute what the electric grid-Swyx [00:07:02]: PowerAnjney [00:07:02]: Yeah, what the power grid did for electricity. It-- this is a pooling and utilization layer across clouds, And so we're actually the opposite of a full stack integration like approach.Swyx [00:07:12]: Super horizontal.Anjney [00:07:13]: Where it's much more horizontal and it's, it's multi-cloud, it's multi-silicon. The goal is to try to make FLOPs flow like megawatts, and that is very hard to do today for many reasons. There's stranded pools of compute all over the place and there's no fungibility. And so right now we do it at the level of scheduling, and we often do it at the economic layer. But as we start to announce what we're working on, it's extraordinary like how many folks are coming out of the woodworks and saying, “Hey, I'm actually working on a way to make compute fungible at this part of the stack and that part of the stack.” And as a grid, we'd like all of these folks to participate on the grid. There's, people often ask me, “Andra, are you a new cloud?” And I go, “No, actually neoclouds are suppliers.” sometimes they'll ask, “Are you a venture capital firm?” I go, “No, actually they are, they are demand like sort of off-takers of the grid.” We see ourselves as what's called an independent system operator. So if you study the history of the electric grid, once it became legible to a lot of factories and industrial sort of participants that, hey, actually it turns out pooling is a good idea. We should pool our generators instead of all having a generator running at half capacity in our backyard. There was a need for an independent entity who could coordinate all these parties. Transmission line, power generation, facilities, transmission lines, factories, and that neutral coordination mechanism is very critical. In order-- If you study like the history of grids, the most enduring ones were those that never owned their own assets. They were ones that had, or often started with long-term anchors who are uncorrelated sources of demand, a steel factory, a shoe mill or whatever in a particular town who weren't competitive, where the steel factory want to spike up at night, the shoe mill wanted to spike up during the day. So then you pool and you share, right? So each of you is guaranteed some base load, but then you kind of schedule your spikes to drive a peak utilization across the town. The gold standard, so to speak, historically, has been these utility companies like PJM Interconnect in the northeast of America, where they, over many years became this what's called an ISO, an independent system operator of the grid. So that's how we see ourselves. Economically, that's what we are. From a technical perspective, we started at the scheduling layer because Seb and Mihai, who, run engineering here, built that at-Swyx [00:09:28]: Did your schedulingAnjney [00:09:28]: They did that at Google. And, -Swyx [00:09:32]: And you have infra shops from Discord as well.Anjney [00:09:35]: I have some.Swyx [00:09:35]: I don't know, I don't know if Discord is like the primary identity, but what-whatever, I'm just kind of-Anjney [00:09:39]: No, D-Discord was-Swyx [00:09:40]: Choosing a well-known name.Anjney [00:09:42]: Well, I So I was running the developer platform there. The internal infrastructure I was not responsible for. That was actually a guy by the name of Mark Smith, who was extraordinary. And yes, Discord did pool So Discord is actually a counter example. I had the chance to learn a lot about fully, full stack infra there because-Swyx [00:09:56]: It's the same thing, yeahAnjney [00:09:57]: It's the, it's the other architecture which is, Discord built its own WebRTC vo-voice and video infra. So like Discord did not use-Swyx [00:10:08]: For the calls, yeah.Anjney [00:10:09]: Yeah, did not For communication, Discord did not use third party infra. It was all built in-house. And then the way you maximize utilization was you pool demand from the world's 200 million plus monthly active gamers, right? And so that's, that's how those stacks were constructed. Again, in systems design, the two concepts that keep coming up over and over again are abstraction and composition, right? And-Swyx [00:10:31]: Bundling and unbundlingAnjney [00:10:33]: Bundling and unbundling, abstraction, composition, like verticalization and-Swyx [00:10:36]: HorizontalAnjney [00:10:36]: Horizontalization. So in that sense, AMP is an independent system operator of the grid. We pool demand, we pool supply from a number of partners we trust At about 1.3 gigawatt scale over four years. And then we pool demand from some of the world's best, research labs and so on. We're sitting at one, periodic labs who need extraordinary long-term demand. And the idea is that, each of them is guaranteed base load on the grid, but they can spike up and down flexibly on, for compute, with much shorter timelines as needed. That was roughly the design of the program I came up with at a16z called Oxygen. The same-- That was the same design of the GQM, BorgX, Borg GQM implementation at Google that Mihai and Seb had built. Which was that how do you allow, teams inside of Google, on the internal infrastructure to be guaranteed capacity, for their base workloads? But when they need to spike up on research, how could they ensure that was sufficiently there? And of course, the big innovation that was not discovered, but kind of implemented in the space, this infra space maybe three, four years ago at Google was the idea of interruptible demand, right? Where you just queue up a bunch of jobs and through this like sort of credit system, there can be a bidding mechanism.Swyx [00:11:53]: Like priorities.Anjney [00:11:54]: It's a dynamic prioritization Basically. And jobs can get interrupted based on somebody else who's saying, “what? I have 10 tokens, 10 credits I want to spend on this job.” Another like team lead, research lead is “Genie 3 or whatever is only worth five, credits, and NanoBanana2 is worth 10 credits,” and so the NanoBanana job gets priority. That's a, that's a made up example.Swyx [00:12:15]: It's very real. Brain Marketplace was real. And, we've, we've covered this on the pod with David Luan, who was-Anjney [00:12:20]: Oh, great. OkaySwyx [00:12:20]: Was there. And the criticism is that, well, actually sometimes you need central command to go all in on a thing. And actually sometimes capitalism via credits doesn't work. Not, this is not a criticism of AMP. I'm just saying, this is a thing that has been tried, internally within Google, and it led to Google missing GPT.Foundry, Frontier Labs, and Research HoardingAnjney [00:12:41]: Like, we structured ourself essentially very similarly to Google. We are structured as a holdings company. So, Alphabet holdings is Alphabet holdings, and then they've got these subsidiaries called Google and-Swyx [00:12:51]: Other betsAnjney [00:12:52]: Other bets and so on. We've got, AMP holdings, and we've got our infrastructure business, and then we've got a capital business called Foundry that incubates new frontier AI labs or invests in them as venture capital, like Periodic. We put a few hundred million dollars into Anthropic from our fund earlier this year. So wherever we feel like teams are making progress, especially researchers and so on who've pushed the frontier inside of existing labs like DeepMind, I find, there comes a point where they feel misaligned with the dictatorship of Alphabet holdings. And at that point, sometimes the dictatorship doesn't want them anymore. And they're “Thank you. You've done your job here. You've kind of helped us through the zero to one phase, and for whatever reason, we're going to deprioritize your amazing, omni model or whatever it is, and instead we're going to prioritize coding.” And, I think that's a tragedy, but I get it. They're Sergey and team are running their own business there. But that doesn't mean we the rest of us should sit around waiting for that progress to get unlocked for the rest of the world and humanity. If you think about how much extraordinary research has happened inside of DeepMind over the last 10 years, I, Demis and Sergey and those guys did such a great job. But at the end of the day, so much of that has never seen the light of day?Swyx [00:14:00]: Or they're like papers only, but they never actually shipped it to production or-Anjney [00:14:03]: What's worse is the paper is actually not even being published anymore ‘cause there's a six-month embargo inside of DeepMind, right? We've heard about this where a paper comes out, and then I think there's a six-month embargo window where if anybody on the business team says, “This could be interesting” It's embargoed for life.Swyx [00:14:18]: Exactly. So the stuff that gets published is the stuff that's not good enough.Anjney [00:14:21]: There's an adverse selection problem, basically. Yeah. At this point-Swyx [00:14:25]: It's, it's a common complaint at NeurIPS, by the way, that's “Well, why would I look at the papers that are the trash of GDM?”Anjney [00:14:31]: Again, I think it's a tragedy. I get it. They're running their business, but the rest of the I think there's negative externalities of research being hoarded, and so that'there's a market failure. And somebody needs to unlock that research, and we can't do it on our own. We only have 1.2 gigawatts of compute. That's nothing. That's about $40 billion of cloud spend. We're going to need a lot-Gigawatt-Scale Compute and End-of-Life PredictionSwyx [00:14:51]: By the way, is that's a new number. I haven't, haven't come across that gigawatt number. That's huge.Anjney [00:14:56]: Yeah. And to be clear, we haven't secured all of it. That's how much demand we have started to secure. I think publicly we haven't actually confirmed how much we have for this year. In order-Swyx [00:15:04]: Where do you want to get to?Anjney [00:15:06]: I think the steady state would be that we have a base load pool Of 1.2 gigawatts at all times Of base load capacity. For spike capacity, right now my estimate is we need roughly six gigawatts over the next four years for all our teams to feel like they were able to keep moving the frontier, whatever they're working on, whether it's, like superconductor discovery over here. There's a new investment we're working on right now, which is in the end of life prediction space in healthcare. It's extraordinary how much you can, you can give this was actually my graduate school work. I went to grad school for bioinformatics at Stanford Med. And I know we-Swyx [00:15:40]: Econ, MCS, bio.Anjney [00:15:41]: So my-- I was this really weird cat where, I was never satisfied with my major options. So at one point I was an econ major, then I was a CS major, then I was a MCS major called mathematical computational science, and they decided they were going to end that major. So I took all that coursework, and I applied it to grad school, my graduate degree in bioinformatics, which was the master's program, and then I thought I was going to do a PhD. I never ended up doing it. I dropped out and went to work at Kleiner. But I was lucky enough to apprentice with this professor at, Stanford Med. His name is Nigam Shah, and he was working on end of life prediction. Stanford is one of the only research facilities in America that has a longitudinal patient data set that's larger at scale. I think it's at least 12 million patient lives. The only larger data set is at the VA, the Veterans Affairs, of America. And to do research, like do any deep learning and so on that data set, it was called the STRIDE data set at that time, you had to be a Stanford Med School affiliate, which is why I went and enrolled in the bioinformatics department. End of deep learning was early. Nigam Shah had the visibility-- the vision to see that, you could do end of life prediction to help palliative care. In America, the, over 30% of all Medicare, Medicaid spend, at least at that time, was spent on end of life care. And what's we grew up in Asia, so we all-- Yeah, at least I won't speak for you, but I have A very different relationship with death than I find folks who grew up in America do. In America, spiritually and culturally, especially in Western societies where Christianity, the Christian tradition sort of frames death as this terminal point, there's often a judgment day and so on. The way we view death is with a finality. In Indian culture, in Hindu culture, death is one-Swyx [00:17:35]: Also, he's Buddhist as well.Anjney [00:17:36]: You're Buddhist, yeah. So it's one, it's one step in a journey of many lives, right? And so, I grew up in this city called Chennai in the south of India, and when people die, you dance on the street. There's like a procession where your body is carried to be cremated and your family, like celebrates and there's drums and so on. It's this huge thing. And, It's because the idea is that you're going to be reincarnated. You've been liberated from the responsibilities of this life, and now you're onto your next. It's a new It's like going off to a new college or whatever, right? And so it was so alien to me when I got here as an undergrad- That the medical system works backwards from that assumption that we have to view death as this terminal thing and delay it, postpone it's a bad thing. And so at the time, clinical decision support in the United States was this very primitive field. Even to this day, physicians in the United States often will tell you when you have a terminal disease, this is your, we've diagnosed you, which is great. Our ability to diagnose you is extraordinary. You have somewhere between six months to six years to live. What do you do with that information? The error bars are so high that then you In times of uncertainty, we default to culture, and when the culture is let's-- this is a bad thing, I've got to prolong my life, then you start doing things like And just to, just sort of from a systems perspective, what's going on there is Physicians often feel like they need to provide such high error bars because there's always some uncertainty in end of life diagnosis, and if you provide the wrong Diagnosis or recommendation to your patient, you can be sued for medical malpractice. And then your license can be taken away. It can be catastrophic for your career. In contrast, if in countries where that's not the case, what you often observe is that patients, physicians are quite prescriptive with their recommendation. They say, “Hey, this is your condition. The literature says that you probably have this much time on Earth left. My expert opinion is that you are an outlier or whatever.” And they try to be more prescriptive, and that empowers a patient, right? ‘Cause then a patient can say, “I trust my doctor. They said on average, I have six months to live, but if I do these things, I may have a shot because of my particular predispositions or my genetic history or whatever.” And that empowers you to go about your life in a actually more scientific way than leaning on religion, culture, spirituality, and so on. In contrast, here, because of that medical malpractice sort of thing looming over your head, a physician never gives you a clear recommendation. So instead you say, “Okay, Doc, well, let's try it all.” And then you start a whole regime of drugs and therapies, and then you often spend weeks and weeks in the hospital, and that deteriorates your quality of life. And when that deteriorates your quality of life, you instead of spending your last few days doing the things you love with your family, you're spending it on a hospital bed. And that ends up being thirty percent of Medicare and Medicaid. So it's worse for the patients. The doctors feel terrible. The American taxpayer is paying a huge amount of money. And so this is why Nigam Shah, who was this professor at Stanford, said, “Anjney, if there's “ I kind of sat down with him. I was this young, I'd, I was twenty-one, and I was “I want to work on a big problem.” He's “The big problem is end of life care.” And so we tried to do deep learning to say, to-- So we started trying to run deep learning on these tried patient data sets to say, “Could you have an AI system make a recommendation that is orders of magnitude more precise about how much time you have left once you've been diagnosed with a terminal condition than a human?” And then if we can get that precision to be high enough, then you can empower the patient. And it turns out the tech works. Like it's-- Once you get the data set, like RL works. Honestly, even regression models work. You don't need to get that fancy. At the time, we were just trying, doing like very simple neural nets.Swyx [00:21:54]: Simple solutions, yeah.Anjney [00:21:54]: Today, what we can do with RL is extraordinary. The problem remains then and now is regulatory, because you actually can't shift the burden of the wrong clinical diagnoses from the physician to the AI system. And so at that time, I got quite disillusioned ten years ago for, twelve years ago where, ‘cause I felt I just didn't have the resources to influence regulation. Today, I'm very lucky. I'm in a different place. I've, I'm a lot older, and so I've been spending a lot of time on my next incubation, which is how can we unlock the, patient empowerment by training AI models to do end of life prediction much, with much more precision and ac-Swyx [00:22:37]: Oh, wow. You're still focused on this the whole time.Anjney [00:22:40]: The-- I haven't been able to get, this out of my mind a single day for the last fourteen years. This is the hill I want, I would like to die on. There's two, I would say. What? I actually, I'd prefer not to die.Swyx [00:22:51]: Yeah, exactly.Anjney [00:22:52]: But I think two bipartisan issues, I think two issues that should be bipartisan in America are how do we empower patients to make the right clinical decisions at the end of their life, such that we're reducing the taxpayer burden with science? It's just good old science, and AI can help here. And the second is, net positive data centers, ‘cause I think that's the biggest critical bottleneck on training and good enough AI models to help people at the end of their life. So there's sort of two sides of the, of the same scaling bottleneck curve, but those two, we formed AMP as a public benefit corporation. My wife and I, who you've met, you've met Viv. Her passion is education. Her family is a long line of educators and so on, and, of physicists. And so this class is my attempt to stop being the black sheep of the family and be a, an educator. But if I'm not educating, the thing I would be doing is working, on these two problems, whether on the political spectrum or as a researcher back at, in some lab. And my hope is if anyone's listening to this podcast, if they're passionate about either of those two topics, I'd love to hear from them. We'll, we'll we can share the contact in the show notes, but, we're looking for people to join both of those missions on the, on the political side as well as on the medical side, on the research side.Frontier Systems, Output Maxing, and AlignmentSwyx [00:24:08]: You said, this is a discipline that you want to form. You call it's called variously called Frontier System. It's variously called One Person Frontier Lab. What is the ideal name or shape of this? Like the, what is the mission?Anjney [00:24:24]: Of the class?Swyx [00:24:26]: Of the discipline that you're, exploring, right? I The class is called Frontier Systems. But like for me, maybe one phrase is you're, you're just anti-waste, right? Which is wasting GPUs, wasting in human and Medicare. But is there, is there a broader theme that I'm, that maybe you can encapsulate more succinctly?Anjney [00:24:45]: Yeah. The, from an engineering perspective, it's very simple. It's output maxing. It's the, it's the department of output maxing.Swyx [00:24:51]: Making the most of what we have.Anjney [00:24:52]: Exactly. I'm a huge believer in optimal outcomes. I think both in America and other countries, we are losing our appreciation for nuance, and this is the thing of And AI is the same case, right? Oh, the bitter lesson holds. Okay, fine. But that doesn't mean you just like throw 500 GB300, 500,000 GB300s at your suboptimal model scaling and you waste a bunch of compute. It also doesn't mean that, the most optimal is to have like 50 different architectures where there isn't enough standardization. One of the reasons Anthropic has had extraordinary sort of velocity is ‘cause they picked the transform architecture and said, “This is simple. Let's double down on it,” right? And now luckily there's enough investment going to the space that we can afford other architectures, but at the time, investment was just too fragmented into other architectures, so that arguably unlocked scaling. So I think there's a philosophy. I think we all owe it to ourselves to do output maxing with a new capability called AI on a global level. I think if I was starting a new department at Stanford, depending on how fuzzy or technical I wanted to be, I'd probably call it the Department of Alignment. Like-Swyx [00:25:59]: It's an overloaded termAnjney [00:26:01]: But it is, But alignment really Is a hard problem. And I think when you unlock it, full stack alignment is super hard in any organization and in any system. Like in a, in a venture capital firm, if you can have full stack alignment between your limited partners and your, the founders who are creating the value and ultimately the public that owns the IPO stock, that is a gift that keeps giving. And when you study the history of these systems, when they start off, they usually start out small scale where the feedback loop is actually so tight that there's alignment. And then the more you try to scale, the more division of labor happens, the more specialization happens, and at each step you add abstractions. And wherever there's an API interface, there's like loss. There's communication loss. And so I think a really cool thing would be for us to figure out is there a way for us to have our cake and eat it too as an engineering discipline? Is there a way to actually scale up and scale out Without losing any alignment, without lossy transmission?Swyx [00:27:01]: You mean standards?Anjney [00:27:02]: So standards is one way. The other way is you just have net new capabilities. So like what we're trying to do here is discover new superconductors. A room temperature superconductor would be a lossless transmission mechanism for energy. We would have flying cars. We are right within a few years of having a new room temperature superconductor. So I think those are the two. You either have to standardize On protocols or API specs that allow lossless communication, or you can come up with a whole new capability that unlocks so much abundance, the standardization doesn't matter ‘cause you just unlock net new capacity. This, the, so this is what I spend my days thinking about these days.Compute Markets, SF Compute, and Non-NVIDIA ChipsSwyx [00:27:38]: No, I think every infra person at, who wants scale and wants to output max does eventually end up thinking about this. We don't have time to go into it, but we have done an episode with SF Compute-Anjney [00:27:50]: Oh, coolSwyx [00:27:50]: That is trying to standardize The futures contract for compute. I don't, I don't know how that's going by the way, but like at some point this will be public.Anjney [00:27:57]: Oh, I think Evan is awesome and SF Compute is the kind of effort that I hope we can accelerate because what often happens is these exchanges are very hard to get, they, it's hard to bootstrap them, right? Because they often require-- There's many inefficiencies between parties. There's trust boundary inefficiencies in infrastructure because you don't trust, one part of the stack doesn't trust another part of the stack to give them visibility. There's capital markets inefficiencies, there's operational efficiencies. So if you can inject like a single shock to the system of a ton of compute demand or supply, then you can accelerate, these new flywheels. And so my hope is one day, or soon, if SF Compute needs extra like has excess capacity, they just hook it up to the grid and they get flooded with demand from us. And on the other side, if they have a ton of demand but they don't have supply, they just again hook up to the grid and it's a two-way protocol where they can just hook up to our capacity. And I don't think we're too far from that. Today our working implementation of it is mostly through a group of labs, universities, and a few sort of trusted parties who are, who all feel like they're in alignment to borrow an over sort of used word. But our hope is to just have it be an open protocol that anyone can hook up to on-Swyx [00:29:20]: Hook up for demand or hook up for supply? In primarily demand, it sounds like. Like you-Anjney [00:29:25]: No, bothSwyx [00:29:26]: You would want to offer demand.Anjney [00:29:27]: Both. Yeah. Unfortunately, what's happened in the last six weeks is, we thought we'd have a bunch of excess capacity by the end of this year. It's all gone.Swyx [00:29:37]: It's exploding.Anjney [00:29:38]: It, yeah. It's all gone. And so I have, my text messages are full of friends, we know many of these people, these are founders who've raised billions of dollars in San Francisco going, “Oh, any chance you have like 50 nodes in the next few weeks?”Swyx [00:29:51]: What is the scope for, non-Nvidia, right? You have Lisa Su coming and, Rainer Pope as well. And so There is a lot of demand for, more performance Alternative architectures and all that. At the same time, this hurts your standardization.Anjney [00:30:11]: I don't think so. So actually Rainer's a great example, right? Rainer is a CEO and founder of, MatX. I actually had him by for office hours in the class earlier today, and there was an insight he brought up that I hadn't considered before, which is when they decided to pick the standard For their data center, they picked the NVIDIA reference architecture. So the MatX chips Just plug in to any site that has an NVIDIA bring up planned. And, the-Swyx [00:30:42]: It's just software then. It's, it's not the-Anjney [00:30:44]: A-Swyx [00:30:44]: Hardware.Anjney [00:30:46]: Well, from an input and IO perspective It's the same footprint as an NVIDIA rack.Swyx [00:30:52]: That makes sense.Anjney [00:30:53]: Where they have done, innovated a bunch from what I can tell is on systems co-design. Which is where a lot of the gains are to be had. And so he picked He was “Anjney, we, there's just so much work to do when you're building a new chip company.”Swyx [00:31:08]: Can't fight every front.Anjney [00:31:08]: You just can't fight on every front. So my question to him was, “Well, you're working on this new chip. Their tape-out is next year. What, who are you going to partner with to host the chips?” And he said, “Whoever will host them. That's just not, that's not my focus.” And I said, “But how did you “ you decided back to our earlier systems design question, he decided that, he didn't want to be a full, fully integrated chip provider. The bottleneck they're focused on is the logic die, and they, he feels they can crank out a ton of performance gains through co-design there. But then that means you delegate, to our question earlier, it, you he's the data center provider is a different part of the stack, and so then he's dependent on that part of the ecosystem to host his chips to get the performance gains to the customer. So now you have another abstraction, and you might have loss. So I asked him, “How do you prevent loss?” And back to your point, he said, “I just picked the NVIDIA standard ‘cause I didn't want to Like I wanted to piggyback off of an existing protocol.” And that, what's great about NVIDIA is that reference architecture is known.Swyx [00:32:15]: Open.Anjney [00:32:15]: It's open. They've published it. So Jensen's actually enabled someone like Rainer to build a chip company like MatX, and I don't see them as competitive. The compute demand is so high. Like, I don't I think NVIDIA's not able to meet the demands of production, so we just need more chips. And I think it's very smart what MatX has done, which is say, “We're just going to we're not going to innovate on the data center design ‘cause actually, thank you, Jensen, you've done all the hard work. Where we can innovate is somewhere else.” And I think that's, that's very healthy. I think that's how we unblock new bottlenecks. And my view is these, the, chip teams like MatX, who have arrived at the insight that co-design is the way, The primary bottleneck for them is trust boundary. To do co-design well, you need visibility into the next model generation as soon as possible ‘cause it takes two years to tape out. So if by the time I bring my chip to market, your model architecture's changed, I'm host. Now, when he was inside Google, he was sitting next to the Gemini team. He was on Palm or whatever.Trust Boundaries, Co-Design, and Researcher CEOsSwyx [00:33:19]: His co-founder was the, was one, was one of the Palm guys, I think.Anjney [00:33:23]: Yes. Yes, exactly. So when you're inside the trust boundary of Google, then your systems co-design loop is super tight. When you leave as a founder, one of the biggest risks you take is now you're outside the trust boundary. And so what I love doing is helping chip teams who can help us unlock more capacity for the independent ecosystem access to trust. Because when I If I've been, involved with a lab from day one, and I was lucky enough to work with Anthropic, and then I'm on the board of Mistral and helped Black Forest Labs get started. I think at this point I'm on six or seven different teams.Swyx [00:33:57]: Only six? I feel like my mental number was going to be 13, but yeah, it's-Anjney [00:34:02]: No, I go deep with one at a time.Swyx [00:34:04]: You're founding CEO of Arena.Anjney [00:34:07]: Nah, that was an, that was an-Swyx [00:34:08]: Administrative CEOAnjney [00:34:09]: It was an administrative five-month gig where Whalen and Anastasios were graduating from their PhDs, and they didn't need a product team. So I helped recruit the head of engineering product and design. But Anastasios has always been the CEO of that company. I played a pinch-hitting I'm an intern. I was CEO intern For five months. -Swyx [00:34:33]: I interviewed him, and he's he's very well-spoken. I think he's a debate, former debate, champion. But also very quantitative and mathematical, which is-Anjney [00:34:41]: He-Swyx [00:34:41]: Such a unicorn.Anjney [00:34:43]: See, what's amazing about him? If you look at his output, he's an output maxer. By the time he was graduating from his PhD, which he only graduated last year, he had published more work with a citation count than, people twice his age. But at the same time, he'd already started a project called LLM Arena that was being used by millions of people As a side project. And time and time again, what I've realized is venture capitalists suck at seeing human beings as, dynamic agents where-Swyx [00:35:14]: They want to put you in a boxAnjney [00:35:15]: They want to put you in a box.Swyx [00:35:15]: This is your thing.Anjney [00:35:16]: So the first time I got introduced to Anastasios, somebody had told me “Oh, he's amazing, but he's a researcher.” I was “what? What do you mean he's a researcher?” That's what-Swyx [00:35:28]: Like he's not a CEO, not a founder.Anjney [00:35:29]: Not a CEO, exactly. I was “Are you crazy? Do you Have you met Dario?” Dario's a scientist. He's gone from zero to, what will soon be a trillion-dollar company in four years. Being a CEO, nominally speaking, is not that hard. Being a good CEO is hard. Being a great CEO actually requires a level of performance that scientists who have already published at the top of their field have accomplished. It is super hard to be a competitive scientist. To publish in academia over the last 20, 30 years, to make it to the top of your discipline at a place like Berkeley, you are a star athlete. Like, you are an athlete of the mind, and you perform at the highest levels. And to get there, whether you're, Anastasios or Whalen at Berkeley, or you are Robin, who-Swyx [00:36:23]: BFL, yeahAnjney [00:36:24]: With Black Forest, who created Stable Diffusion, or if you're, like Guillaume at Meta, who created Llama before he started Mistral. The amount of human leadership you have to demonstrate to get the resources, like get the trust of the organization, publish it, put it up. I would just fund researchers all day Right? If who have contributed already to the field. If they've, if they've put SOTA out there, they're, they're star athletes already. If they haven't done SOTA Look, they can still be good CEOs, but then I find the failure mode is that they just don't want to be CEOs, they primarily want to publish, and that's okay, too. One of the things we do with the AMP Grid is we donate excess compute. We have two nonprofits, like university labs. We carved out like a couple thousand H100s. But I do think there's extraordinary research being done on university campuses. My father-in-law's a physicist. He's a professor. Extraordinary work in physics, and we need that. But if you want to be a CEO, what you need to be willing To do is be super confrontational, outside of science. Like within the scientific community, some of the best researchers are very confrontational about their convictions, right? This architecture is right. To be a great CEO, you basically have to be willing to be confrontational up and down the stack.Swyx [00:37:41]: To your own team.Anjney [00:37:42]: To your own team-Swyx [00:37:43]: To customersAnjney [00:37:43]: Hiring, recruiting customers. Well, I would say, Yeah, pretty much to everyone Everybody. Of course-Swyx [00:37:50]: I see, I feel a little bit of that in my own work, but yeah, I can't imagine the stakes that Dario has had to go through. It's, it's pretty insane.Anjney [00:37:56]: No, I don't think the stakes are that different From how you're feeling it, right? Stakes are personal scaling vectors, right? The stakes that seem so low to you, like having this podcast where you can talk to somebody and just have a you're an extraordinary communicator, right? Like already in this conversation, you've pulled more out of me than most people, and I've been on 12 podcasts in the last two weeks.AI Coachella and First-Principles ThinkingSwyx [00:38:17]: I think I, we've just seen each other enough that there's some base trust.Anjney [00:38:20]: There's base trust.Swyx [00:38:20]: And I think, and I know that you, that I've done my homework and like I know that trust is a big deal for you, so.Anjney [00:38:27]: I think trust is about consistency, and you and I have seen each other In the community for years, right? Like, I remember the first time we met was at NeurIPS in New Orleans. I don't know if you remember that, luncheon.Swyx [00:38:38]: Oh my God.Anjney [00:38:39]: Reiko had set up this Reiko's amazing, and he set up this luncheon and-Swyx [00:38:43]: Yeah, I was “Who's this Discord guy?” I'm “Okay.” But-Anjney [00:38:45]: No, you weren't-Swyx [00:38:46]: You were just “You made some investments.”Anjney [00:38:47]: You were much less polite. You were “Who's this VC?” You're like-Swyx [00:38:51]: No, I Was I? Oh my God.Anjney [00:38:53]: It was-Swyx [00:38:53]: I'm so sorryAnjney [00:38:53]: It was visible on your face.Swyx [00:38:54]: I'm so sorry. But you weren't, you weren't The introduction was bad. I was I didn't know who you were.Anjney [00:39:00]: The, see, this is the thing about context, right? Like, but then I think I heard your accent. And I was “Are you-”Swyx [00:39:06]: Singapore, yeahAnjney [00:39:06]: “Are you Singaporean?” And you're “Yeah.” And I said, “I went to high school, JC, in Singapore.” And then the ice broke. But This is the there are in the scientific community, sometimes the stakes are very high for people who haven't had the emotional, what is called EQ Coaching and mentorship, right? Which is like to have scientific impact, you often need to be a extraordinary emotional, like emotionally in tune person with the folks you're trying to influence. And so what comes so naturally to you is actually a super high stakes thing to other people. And so I wouldn't assume that Dario's more stressed out than you. These things are you'd be surprised how similar and small sometimes the problems are to you That some of the world's biggest, leaders are facing. And that's what I've learned from this class. The guest speakers are Sam, Satya, Jensen.Swyx [00:40:01]: AI Coachella.Anjney [00:40:02]: Yeah. It's AI Coachella, right? So we got to get all the headliners, and they're I'm very lucky that some of these people have either mentored me over the years or I've done business with them. And when you, take the performative stuff out and any assumptions you may have about these people that you read in the press or on Twitter, We're all just humans. We're all trying to get along. And what's so special about this moment is AI is forcing, like scaling, the bitter lesson is forcing a lot of people to revise their assumptions for how the world works and go back to first principles or go and educate themselves. So the kind of people I was, I won't name who this person is, but I was at an event last week in Texas and, ran to somebody who said, “Anjney, I came across the class. What do you think about real time action prediction models?” And I was, don't know how happy it made me feel when they asked me that question. I know they've done the work. They've challenged themselves. I'm, they didn't ask me, “What do you think of world models?” They said, “What do you think of n-”Swyx [00:41:04]: Real time action predictionAnjney [00:41:05]: “action, real time action prediction models?” World models, don't get me wrong, are cool and everything, but you and I both know that is a layer of abstraction that is sometimes not usefully precise enough. Right? Ours-Swyx [00:41:16]: There's like four different kinds of world models.Anjney [00:41:17]: Yes, exactly.Swyx [00:41:18]: We've done the part with general intuition, by the way, which is very focused on, -Anjney [00:41:22]: Oh, cool. Yes. I love Pim. Pim is great. And this is what I love about people who've done that level of work. They realize they're not in competition with people who the rest of the world thinks they're in competition with.Swyx [00:41:34]: Because they're not in the category, they're in the specific thing they're trying to do.Anjney [00:41:37]: They're focused on their mission, and they have a systems understanding of the bottleneck they're trying to solve. And when somebody else says, “I'm working on real time, action prediction models too,” Pim goes, “Oh, I love that person. I want, I can learn from them.” But the minute they're “Oh, that person's a world model person,” it's “like which type of world model person?” But mostly they're just trying to figure out if it's a waste of their time, because we don't have enough time. So, Pim, for example, is super, loves this other company I work with we've talked about called Black Forest Labs. And he's mentioned to me multiple times that he's so, He thinks what Flux is doing is really cool. Andy Blattman came by and spoke in the class. And what I find over and over again is for people who do the work, who can be usefully precise enough about like what is actually going on in the world of frontier research, The sense of camaraderie is still well and alive, but it gets lost sometimes when you have to like abstract The technical complexities in, business terms And then the VCs are “How are you different from that world model?” I'm going to say Where do I even start to explain this stuff? And then the misalignment creeps in.Leading vs. Winning in Frontier AISwyx [00:42:43]: This is good. Yeah, I think, people listening get a sense of, what it is like to operate at a real level, like yourself, rather than at, the journalist level, where you have to sort of put everyone in, a rough category and create a narrative of competition, and who's winning today, who's behind.Anjney [00:42:58]: It-- this idea of winning is so Weird to me.Swyx [00:43:03]: You do want to win. You want you want competitiveness.Anjney [00:43:06]: No, I think you want to lead.Swyx [00:43:07]: You want SOTA.Anjney [00:43:07]: No, I think you want to lead. Yes, so you want to push the frontier. You want to push the SOTA. You want to do something that hasn't been done before. You want to capture value, but you don't want to capture so much value that, people think you're unaligned with your mission or trying to do what's best for the world. You want to capture enough value that you can keep innovating, right? And I think that people want to lead, they don't really This idea of winning and losing, again, I love Jensen. He's a, he's a leader. The mindset that he talked about on Dwarkesh's podcast, right? He's “I didn't wake up with a loser mindset.” I think that was awesome, right? Because he's, he's an engineer. Dwarkesh has done the work. So there's at least-- even though the, to me, it was very obvious they're talking about the same thing, they just passed each other. They just had to basically, Jensen has this, five-layer cake abstraction of how the industry works. And Dwarkesh had, I think from that podcast, had more of, a pre-training, mid-training, post-training systems loop concept.Swyx [00:44:04]: It's just a factor of who he talks to, right? Again, it's very clear.Anjney [00:44:06]: It's the systems It's the abstraction, the mental models, the It's the whole-- Dude, so much of the problem in the world is reasoning by analogy. And then the assumptions that are held invisibly.Swyx [00:44:19]: Yeah, I've, I've said, this is actually the best time in human history for first principles thinkers. Because everything you think will happen is actually now coming true.Anjney [00:44:28]: Correct. And the venture capital community is, notorious for this, where people look-- In times of uncertainty, they, cling to axioms that ended up being true from the previous era, and they kind of like proclaim them with confidence as if they're truths, but they're not. And it's very important to see the distinction between a heuristic and an axiom. An axiom can be proven-Swyx [00:44:55]: Like from internal consistency point of viewAnjney [00:44:56]: With internal consistency. A heuristic is a way you kind of a shortcut. And my God, the number of people I have had to put up with over the last few years who proclaim-- use heuristics As axioms to judge people, to judge which companies are going to succeed or the number of people who are “Oh, yeah, Anthropic, they're just training models right now,” but this one continue.Swyx [00:45:22]: Because that's a B2B SaaS?Anjney [00:45:23]: Yeah, the, like Which over the fullness of time, if you squint at it, maybe. But the way you arrive there is so important that you can-- you just, you can dismiss people. Here's what happened, right? What happened is Anthropic basically achieved takeoff in October of last year. That training run-Swyx [00:45:41]: Whatever, three seven?Anjney [00:45:42]: I forget the numbers now, but whatever that checkpoint was-Swyx [00:45:45]: We saw the cognition.Anjney [00:45:46]: Yeah. Right? You probably-- The, to those of us in the community, especially once post-training was done and it was released in December-Swyx [00:45:52]: Yeah. Can I sneak a sneaky question in there? I don't know if you have a perspective, maybe you don't, I just The number one question is how did Anthropic crack coding, right? Because Claude One, Claude Two, okay, like it was part of it, but it wasn't a big deal. And the leading hypothesis, it's a lucky dice roll that was then compounded, right? Like it was like Mildly better, but then they saw it and they were “Okay, let's really invest.”How Anthropic Cracked CodingAnjney [00:46:17]: I had this very annoying teacher. I went to this boarding school called Rishi Valley in India, which is like this, bird preserve. It's like three hundred and fifty acres of bird preserve in rural India, and there was no technology for seven years. There was this teacher, I won't name them, but they would have this-- I hated it every time he said this to me. He was “Luck fa-favors the prepared mind,” which is like a common saying, but the way he delivered it, always grated me, ‘cause he was always I was always one of those kids who got, a good grade without trying very hard. ‘Cause like high middle school is not that hard if you, if you're generally, paying attention and so on. And there was this one time where I-- But then I would get an eighty percent grade, and he would keep pushing me to say “The reason you didn't get the ninety-five plus percent is because you're not that lucky.” And I would say, “What do you mean?” ‘Cause I would think that I deserved that grade, and I would sometimes argue with him. And he'd say, “You didn't have a prepared mind. If you want to get lucky again “ There was basically one time where I got like ninety-five or ninety-six on this, on this subject, and I, now that I felt entitled. I was “Okay, I'm going to keep doing this,” and I didn't. And then he was “Luck favors a prepared mind. You got lucky last time, but you got to stay prepared.” And I didn't understand what he meant. Now, as I'm older, I'm okay, these adults actually knew a thing or two. Anthropic has been the most prepared company for four years. And so then when the right, context data comes in, the right developers start sending in, the right context diffs, Sure, you could say you got lucky, but if you ask me, they're pr-pretty damn prepared with paranoia for like four years. And you have to remember, it was so hard for them to get going early on that they had to do so much more with so much less that you just have to be prepared to be so efficient.Swyx [00:48:06]: Yes. There's numbers on their burn compared to OpenAI. I've, I've written about it, but they are so much more efficient in their, in their tech stack.Anjney [00:48:14]: It's not even It's not funny.Swyx [00:48:14]: Not even close.Anjney [00:48:15]: Yeah. But it's so clear, right? Like how to output max for the world. They have been prepared, and you could call that luck, but Luck favors the prepared mind.Culture, Hardship, and Anthropic's P0Swyx [00:48:25]: This is one of those things that I was going over some of your old lectures and, you were data, people think it's a moat and actually it's culture and actually it's team Actually. And I, it's-- there's different levels of moats, and this is the ultimate one that determines everything else. Which you can then compoundAnjney [00:48:43]: You're saying culture is the ultimate moat? Yeah. But the thing about culture is it's very fragile. So moats, I don't think they're-- there's very few moats I found that are actually moats. They're-- It's, it's a nice concept, but in reality, you have to replenish your culture. Ben Horowitz was, the speaker in CS153 on Tuesday, and I asked him this question about the culture bottleneck in teams because, there are several AI teams-Swyx [00:49:09]: His book, Hard Things About Hard ThingsAnjney [00:49:11]: Hard Thing About Hard Things. But more concretely, there are so many AI labs today that have all the cash they need, they have all the compute they need, and they're still not able to ship anything SOTA. And then you start seeing people leave and so on, and my diagnosis, it's, is it's the culture. And so I asked him, Ben, they're-- He's been one of the most aggressive investors in AI labs. He goes back to this thing which resonates in my mind a lot. It-- When I used to work at a16z, I would, book a conference room, and right outside the conference room, which is closest to the toilet ‘cause it was the fastest way for me to go use the bathroom between Zoom meetings-Swyx [00:49:45]: Oh my God, I'll put maxing my toilet optimization. Okay, never mind.Anjney [00:49:48]: It was not healthy in hindsight, but maybe this is TMI. But anyway, outside that conference on the wall was this quote that was printed that said, “Culture is not a set of beliefs, it's a set of actions.” And it's by Bushido, is this, Japanese philosopher. And if you stop taking the actions that demonstrate the mission alignment to what you've said to your team and to your-- the world matters to you, then your culture starts to fray. So it's not actually a moat, I would say. It's a very brittle, fragile thing that requires daily tending to like a garden. But if you figure out the system to keep that garden tended, which I think ultimately comes down to knowing yourself ‘cause you most naturally, if you're authentic and so on, you'll naturally make trade-offs that seem effortless to you, but that reinforce your culture. And then That becomes this very hard thing for other people to catch up to. And at Anthropic, from day one, there was this mission like-- missionary like zeal and belief that, hey, these capabilities will scale. These systems are stochastic, not deterministic. There will be error bars, and until we crack interpretability, there's risk. And at some point, people will go-- stop using Claude just for coding. They'll use it in some mission-critical context where there's-- it'll throw off a bug, and then people are going to come blame them, and they want to be on the right side of history where they said, “Yes, this is a powerful technology. We think it's going to change the world, And we want to be very measured and scientific about the fact that, ‘Hey, guys, these are stats models, statistical models.' That's how statistics works.” ultimately, when you're training neural nets, it is just a statistical system. And I think that Belief that safety is important and that it might seem toy-like in the early days, and sometimes, you could say, “Anjney, they totally over-exaggerated the risk,” like two years ago when they said, “Let's not launch Claude One,” or whatever. Well, okay, maybe in hindsight, but hindsight is twenty/twenty. And at the time, they didn't know how that model would be used, and to them it felt existential if somebody came and said, “You weren't responsible. It-- This wrote a bug.” The liability associated with that is massive. So how do you prevent against that? Well, day in, day out, you say safety. And when you start deviating from that, you have the team hold you accountable, you have the world hold you accountable, and I think that becomes a moat over time. At some point, that moat will get challenged and so on, and then it become fragile. I hope it endures because that's the beauty of having founders run the show, ‘cause they can make really hard trade-offs to do mission alignment. The hardest part is in the earliest days when you don't have a group of people who are going through difficulty, stress, crisis together, then your culture doesn't get defined sharply enough, and that's what I'm worried about right now, is there's so much money going to these labs. There's no hardship. There's no-Swyx [00:52:50]: To anyone who knowsAnjney [00:52:51]: There's no to anyone who knows. And that, in hindsight, was a feature, not a bug for Anthropic. The number of people who said no, the number of people who said, “Sorry, we're all doing investors in OpenAI,” that is competitive difference. It forces you to really understand, what is the hill you want to die on at the expense of everything else. What's the P zero? And there, P zero from day one was coding. The reason, the mechanism system there was if we crack coding, Then we will crack AGI. Our mission is AGI. We want to get there safely. If we focus on codin

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 13 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Change in JK tone Cancellation of Order of the Star in The East JK's own journey started Incidents happened in 1928 and 1929 మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 14 వ భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine : https://koumudi.net/

Guillemette Moreau-Pernet est masseur-kinésithérapeute à Clermont-Ferrand, spécialisée dans l'accompagnement des enfants polyhandicapés.Dans cet épisode, elle raconte sa vocation de toujours, ses années au CHU, sa mission humanitaire au Maroc, et surtout cette découverte à Montréal en 2015 : un robot d'entraînement à la marche qui repousse les limites de ce qu'on pensait possible en rééducation pédiatrique.Depuis, elle a créé une association pour acquérir ce robot, trouvé des mécènes, traversé une crise Covid ...... et lancé la première étude scientifique qui démontre, IRM à l'appui, que 10 séances de robot améliorent durablement la connectivité cérébrale des enfants.Un épisode sur la persévérance, la technologie au service de l'humain, et cette conviction simple : quand ça marche, il faut se battre pour que tout le monde y ait accès.Ressources :Les transformateurs, épisode 19 : Blandine Canut - Ma mère, cette héroïne.Le centre Neuro Concept de MontréalL'article du Dr Laura Julien, “Robot-assisted gait training improves walking and cerebral connectivity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy”, mai 2024Face à face avec son cerveau, Stanislas Dehaene, O. Jacob, 2021Le sens du bonheur, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Point, 2007Le garçon dans la lune, Kate O'Riordan, Joelle Losfeld, 2008La méthode VojtaCrédits de l'épisodeInterview : Aude NyadanuMusique : Aude Nyadanu & Pierre RoquinMontage : Charline Yao

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 12 వ భాగంః ఇందులో World Teacher is here..! Change in JK's tone of speeches Rajagopal, Rosalind Marriage JK, Helen silent separation

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 11 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Nitya's last days Krishna away from Nitya Nitya's death impact on Krishna Murthy Change in the thought process మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 12 వ భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine: https://koumudi.net/

Nous faisons confiance à la pensée pour résoudre nos problèmes — personnels, sociaux, existentiels. Mais Krishnamurti pose une question radicale : comment la pensée pourrait-elle résoudre ce qu'elle a elle-même créé ? Seul un mental vraiment silencieux, qui regarde sans analyser ni juger, peut voir la totalité d'un problème — et c'est dans ce silence que naît l'amour, seule vraie solution. Bibliographie:_ "La première et la dernière liberté", discours de Jiddu Krishnamurti, éditions Le Livre de Poche. Musique: Ethereal Ephemera (https://etherealephemera.bandcamp.com/album/the-eternal-music-box) Narration et réalisation: Bruno Léger Production: Les mécènes du Vieux Sage Puisse la parole des maîtres toucher un nombre infinis de coeurs.Puissent tous les êtres, visibles et invisibles, proches et lointains, humains et non humains être libérés et heureux. OM Shanti, Shanti, Shanti. 

Send us comments, suggestions and ideas here! In this week's episode we are joined once again by Julian Soloninka, better yet known as Julian the Philosopher to discuss his provocative insights into Cyberpunk Metaphysics; which we discuss in its germinal stages under the inspired headspace of Alan Watts, Alduous Huxley and Gregory Bateson. In the first half of the episode we discuss the impact Alan Watts and Gregory Bateson had on cyberpunk and its corresponding philosophies while investigating the role they played as secret agents each with respective ties to three letter agencies before asking ourselves if we were to meet them on Homerian or Platonic footing. In the extended side of the show we continue our discussion with Julian and discuss prominent author, philosopher and psychonaught, Alduous Huxley; his connection to Jiddu Krishnamurti, the Death of Cleopatra and what it all has to do with Philip K. Dick's theophany. Thank you and enjoy the show! Check out Julian the Philosopher's most recent work:https://medium.com/@jsoloninIn this week's episode we discuss:What is cyberpunk metaphysics?Allan WattsDiogenes Gregory Bateson Carl Jung's The SpyAleister CrowleyJiddu KrishnamurtiV for ApophisSecret Societies Making Our EntertainmentThe Power of The Koan and The Double Bind In the second half of this episode available at www.patreon.com/TheWholeRabbit we follow Julian the Philosopher further down the rabbithole and discuss:Philip K. Dick's TheophanyThe Platonic HeroThe MatrixCleopatraTheosophy, Lucifer and New-ThoughtThe Death of HypatiaAldous HuxleyMore next time….This week's episode was a freestyle Socratic seminar between Julian the Philosopher, Tim Hacker, Luke Madrid, Mari Sama and Heka Astra Where to find The Whole Rabbit:Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0AnJZhmPzaby04afmEWOAVInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_whole_rabbitTwitter: https://twitter.com/1WholeRabbitOrder Stickers: https://www.stickermule.com/thewholerabbitOther Merchandise: https://thewholerabbit.myspreadshop.com/Music By Spirit Travel Plaza:https://open.spotify.com/artist/30dW3WB1sYofnow7y3V0YoSupport the show

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 10 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Travel to Europe , India, Australia Mysterious process Continues Holidays in Italy Nitya - Mary Love Story Nitya Health Deteriorates Back to US from Australia మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 11 వ భాగంలో.

#jiddukrishnamurti #philosophy #philosopher ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 9 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Travel to Europe after year and half Mysterious process Continues Solace in the presence of Helen Nitya Health Concerns Back to US along with Rajagopal Disapproval of Nitya, Rosalind love New Car gift మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 10 వ భాగంలో..

In this episode of Ojai Talk of the Town, Bret Bradigan sits down with Richa Badami — actor, director, and founder of the Living Theatre Academy of Dramatic Arts in Ojai — whose journey runs from the intensity of the Indian film and television industry to the intimate, exacting work of training young actors in a small but culturally ambitious town.Badami's career began in India, where she worked in film and television before turning her focus toward directing and teaching. That evolution — shaped by mentors, artistic rigor, and a search for deeper meaning — eventually led her to Ojai, where she has built something rare: not just a youth program, but a working theatre company. At the Living Theatre Academy, young performers are held to professional standards, immersed in ensemble practice, and challenged to engage with material that demands emotional truth and intellectual depth.In this conversation, Badami reflects on the teachers who shaped her, the influence of Jiddu Krishnamurti on her approach to art and education, and the role theatre can play in developing life skills — discipline, empathy, collaboration — that extend far beyond the stage. She also shares candid thoughts on her experiences within the Indian film world, including projects like Rise, Roar & Revolt and Monsoon Wedding, and what it means to navigate identity across the global Indian diaspora.The discussion comes at a moment when her company is mounting an ambitious Spring season featuring The Wolves and The Outsiders — two works that, on the surface, could not be more different, yet converge on a central question: how young people find their place in the world. The Academy's production of The Wolves, a Pulitzer Prize finalist, demands precision, vulnerability, and true ensemble work, while The Outsiders channels the enduring story of Ponyboy and the Greasers with a cast close in age to the characters themselves, bringing unusual immediacy and authenticity to a generational classic. Performances run May 22–24 (The Wolves) and May 29–31 (The Outsiders) at Matilija Auditorium — an opportunity for Ojai audiences to witness the kind of serious, youth-driven theatre typically associated with far larger cities. If you think of student theatre as light fare, think again. What Badami is building is disciplined, emotionally resonant, and unmistakably alive —and for young people in Ojai, it's an extraordinary gift.Go see it.We talked about her membership in the Rotary Club of Ojai, navigating a move from the East Coast to Ojai with teen-aged children, her recent visit to London where her daughter performed with the Royal Academy of the Dramatic Arts. We did not talk about mahseer fishing, Bengal tigers or the films of Alejandro Jodorowsky. For more information, check out https://www.livingtheateracademy.com/

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 8 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Mysterious process begins Inexplicable pains and unconsciousness to Krishna New role for Rosalind New message under Pepper Tree Purchasing estate in Ojai Valley Travel to Europe after 1.5 years మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 9 వ భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine: https://koumudi.net/

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 7 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Meeting father after 10 years Trip to Australia Nitya's TB becomes severe Trip to US Ojai Valley Treatment to Nitya Entry of Rosalind మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 8 వ భాగంలో..

Programa Caminhos da Consciência - Rádio Vibe Mundial 95.7FMInspirado nos ensinamentos de Jiddu Krishnamurti e Swami Vivekananda, neste programa conversamos sobre como estamos perdendo a capacidade de observar, compreender e pensar com clareza.

#jiddukrishnamurti #philosophy #philosopher ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 6 వ భాగంః ఇందులో   2 Years Paris Life Nitya Business Plans Nitya TB attack 5000 Acres Fort donated to Krishna First Love story of Krishna

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 5 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Intense educational coaching for years Three times failure in Matriculation Strengthened bonding between brothers మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 6 వ భాగంలో..

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 4 వ భాగంః ఇందులో Final verdict of case Narayanaih Vs Annie Besant Krishna, Nitya' hiding places during court case days Krishna, Nitya home tutoring, conflicts among tutors Motherly affection from Lady Emily Lutyens, misunderstanding by others మరిన్ని విశేషాలు 5 వ భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine: https://koumudi.net/

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 3 వ భాగంః ఇందులో 0:00 Introduction 06:24 Trip to India end of 1911 10:53 Narayanayya Objections 20:00 Back to London in 1912 February 27:06 Court Case 1913 April మరిన్ని విశేషాలు నాలుగవ భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine: https://koumudi.net/  

Bibliographie:_ "La première et la dernière liberté", discours de Jiddu Krishnamurti, éditions Le Livre de Poche. Musique: Mirada - A revealing moment (https://mirada.bandcamp.com/track/a-revealing-moment) Narration et réalisation: Bruno Léger Production: Les mécènes du Vieux Sage Que règnent la paix et l'amour parmi tous les êtres de l'univers.  OM Shanti, Shanti, Shanti. 

#jiddukrishnamurti #philosophy #philosopher ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 2 వ భాగంః ఇందులో 0:00 Introduction 03:19 Events in 1909, Into Lead Beater folds 20:26 First Initiation in 1910 46:01 First Trip to London in 1911 మరిన్ని విశేషాలు మూడవ భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine: https://koumudi.net/  

ప్రపంచ గురువుగా ఎదురు చూసిన వ్యక్తి… అదే ప్రపంచానికి “నన్ను అనుసరించవద్దు” అని చెప్పినవాడు Jiddu Krishnamurti. మదనపల్లెలో జన్మించిన ఒక సాధారణ బాలుడు ప్రపంచ మేధావులను ఆలోచింపజేసిన తత్వవేత్తగా ఎలా మారాడో ఇదే ఆ కథ. మతాలు, గురువులు, సిద్ధాంతాలను తిరస్కరించి “సత్యం మార్గం లేని భూమి” అని ప్రకటించిన ఆయన, మన జీవితాన్ని కాదు… మన మనసును ప్రశ్నించమని సవాలు విసిరాడు. భయం, అసూయ, బాధ మనలోనే ఎలా పుడతాయో చూపిస్తూ, నిజమైన స్వేచ్ఛ మనలోనే ఉందని గుర్తుచేశాడు. వేలాది అనుచరులు ఉన్నా ఒక్కరినీ అనుసరించవద్దని చెప్పిన అరుదైన వ్యక్తి ఆయన. తత్వశాస్త్రం కాదు… జీవితమే ఒక పరిశోధన అని నిరూపించిన ఆలోచనకర్త. శాస్త్రవేత్తలతో, విద్యావేత్తలతో, సాధారణ మనుషులతో సమానంగా సంభాషించిన అతని మాటలు పుస్తకాల్లో మాత్రమే కాదు, మన రోజువారీ ఆలోచనల్లో మార్పు తీసుకురావడానికి విలువైన సూత్రాలు అని అనేకమంది నమ్ముతారు.. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి జీవితం ఒక కథ కాదు… ప్రతి మనిషి తనను తాను తెలుసుకునే ప్రయాణానికి ఒక ఆహ్వానం. జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తిగారి జీవనరేఖలు 1 వ భాగంః ఇందులో 0:00 Introduction 15:50 References 16:59 Childhood 24:29 Theosophical Society 33:00 Life in Adayar  మరిన్ని విశేషాలు రెండో భాగంలో.. KiranPrabha Talk Shows List: https://koumudi.net/talkshows/index.htm Koumudi Web Magazine: https://koumudi.net/

Jiddu Krishnamurti challenged one of humanity's deepest assumptions—that wisdom must come from teachers, traditions, or systems. Instead, he argued that genuine understanding begins with self-observation and choiceless awareness.   In this short slide set, I summarize the life and ideas of Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895–1986)—the thinker who famously declared: "Truth is a pathless land."  

Is the "me" you experience every day an actual entity, or just a reflection of your conditioned experience? In this episode, Adam is joined by Reed to explore the "Sense of Me" in relation to awareness itself. Reed shares his journey from "dropping everything" and attempting biblical literal-ism to returning to these questions with a fresh, untainted perspective. Key Topics Covered: Signposts of Thought: How belief systems and conceptual frameworks carve the shape of our thoughts. Spiritual Integration: Why "fireworks and rocket ships" are less common than a slow, gradual ground of being. The Teacher Trap: A candid look at Jiddu Krishnamurti, the "entertainment" of spiritual teachings, and the Jim Newman vs. Sam Harris debate. Identity & Personas: Reed's "master plan" to launch his music project, Numinal, by playing with the concept of fame and projection. At the heart of the conversation is a direct question: Can you actually find the “me,” or is it just a movement of thought? This dialogue touches on non-duality, Krishnamurti, Advaita, Zen, and the lived experience of awareness. www.InsideTheMindsEye.com

Bibliographie:_ "La première et la dernière liberté", discours de Jiddu Krishnamurti, éditions Le Livre de Poche. Musique: Ethereal Ephemera (https://etherealephemera.bandcamp.com/album/travels-through-inner-space) Narration et réalisation: Bruno Léger Production: Les mécènes du Vieux Sage Que règnent la paix et l'amour parmi tous les êtres de l'univers.  OM Shanti, Shanti, Shanti. 

Education and The Significance of Life by Jiddu Krishnamurti argues that true education must go beyond mere vocational training to foster self-knowledge, freedom, and an integrated mind, addressing the deeper meaning of life to prevent the shallowness and conflict caused by a fragmented, fear-based existence. Based on these ideas, current system is an absolute failure.00:00 Intro01:10 Welcome, my name is...02:44 Conventional Education03:42 Two Kinds of REVOLT04:44 How has current "education" failed?06:57 How are systems changed?08:10 What is the HIGHEST FUNCTION of education?10:14 Where does the confusion come from?13:41 Is there a difference between the "old" and the "young"15:01 LIFE is a well of deep waters17:01 What can a single individual do?17:52 Intellect VS. Intelligence20:03 RIGHT EDUCATION is a danger to the sovereign governments  21:31 TRUE TEACHER - EDUCATOR23:37 AND..."Education and The Significance of Life" by Jiddu Krishnamurti - Book PReviewBook of the Week - BOTW - Season 9 Book 6Buy the book on Amazon https://amzn.to/4qwIDpNGET IT. READ :)#education #knowledge #growth FIND OUT which HUMAN NEED is driving all of your behaviorhttp://6-human-needs.sfwalker.com/Human Needs Psychology + Emotional Intelligence + Universal Laws of Nature = MASTER OF LIFE AWARENESShttps://www.sfwalker.com/master-life-awareness

Citações e trechos do livro “A Primeira e a Última Liberdade”, de Jiddu Krishnamurti.Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895-1986) foi um renomado filósofo e pensador indiano, reconhecido por sua visão única sobre espiritualidade e autotransformação.Nascido em Madanapalle, Índia, foi descoberto na juventude pela Sociedade Teosófica, que o proclamou como o "instrutor do mundo". No entanto, em 1929, Krishnamurti rejeitou essa designação, dissolveu a Ordem da Estrela e seguiu um caminho independente, rejeitando rituais e instituições. Ele passou a vida viajando pelo mundo, dando palestras e escrevendo, sempre focado em uma profunda busca pela liberdade e a verdade.Krishnamurti enfatizava a importância da autoinvestigação e da liberdade de dogmas e autoridades externas. Ele defendia que a verdade é uma terra sem caminhos e que cada indivíduo deve explorar sua própria mente para encontrar a libertação. Seus ensinamentos abordavam temas como o autoconhecimento, a meditação como atenção plena e a dissolução do ego. Ele rejeitava a ideia de mestres espirituais, insistindo que cada um é responsável por sua própria jornada interior.Jiddu Krishnamurti é amplamente considerado um dos maiores pensadores espirituais do século XX. Suas ideias influenciaram a psicologia, a educação e a filosofia. Seu legado continua vivo através de suas fundações, livros e discursos.

# TEMA EL FUTURO DE LA HUMANIDAD+Análisis charla Jiddu Krishnamurti & David Bohm# PRESENTA Y DIRIGE 

Tässä OkeiOllaRikki - podcast jaksossa sukelletaan ahdistukseen ilman kaunistelua – mutta myös ilman toivottomuutta. Vieraana on Samuli Peltola, joka puhuu kokemuksesta käsin elämästä pakko-oireisen häiriön, yleistyneen ahdistuneisuushäiriön, PTSD:n ja masennusjaksojen kanssa. Taustalla on osastojaksoja, vuosien psykoterapiaa, lääkekokeiluja ja magneettihoitoa – mutta myös satoja keikkoja, arkea ja pakkoa jatkaa elämää kaiken tämän keskellä. Jakso ei jää diagnooseihin. Puhumme ahdistuksesta osana ihmisyyttä: epävarmuudesta, kontrollin tarpeesta ja perfektionismista, jotka usein naamioituvat “vahvuudeksi”. Samuli avaa konkreettisesti, mitä ahdistuksen kanssa eläminen on opettanut ja miten sitä voi oppia kantamaan, vaikka sitä ei voisi poistaa. Keskiöön nousee yksi elämätaito ylitse muiden: meditointi. Samulin mukaan se on ollut tärkein yksittäinen keino opetella olemaan ajatusten ja tunteiden kanssa ilman pakoa tai taistelua. Ei rauhoittumisen tekniikkana, vaan taitona havainnoida mieltä – ja olla samaistumatta kaikkeen, mitä päässä liikkuu. Keskustelussa risteävät moderni psykoterapia (KKT, hyväksymis- ja omistautumisterapia) ja hengellinen filosofia. Carl Jung muistuttaa, että torjuttu mieli palaa kohtalona. Kierkegaard näki ahdistuksen vapauden hintana. Viktor Frankl osoitti, että merkitys syntyy kärsimyksestä huolimatta. Tony Robbins ja Jordan Peterson puhuvat vastuusta, suunnasta ja toiminnasta – ei tunteiden katoamisesta. Mukana kulkevat myös Eckhart Tolle, Jiddu Krishnamurti ja Alan Watts: tietoisuus, läsnäolo ja irtipäästäminen ilman todellisuudesta irtautumista. Tämä jakso on sinulle, joka et enää etsi nopeaa helpotusta, vaan tapaa elää ehjemmin sen kanssa, mikä ei ehkä koskaan katoa.

Dr Valentin Gerlier is a scholar and musician, who teaches the Poetics of Imagination at Dartington Arts School. In this episode we discuss the thought of Jiddu Krishnamurti---  Become part of the Hermitix community:  Hermitix Twitter - https://twitter.com/Hermitixpodcast Support Hermitix:  Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/hermitix Donations: - https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpod Hermitix Merchandise - http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2 Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLK  Ethereum Donation Address: 0x31e2a4a31B8563B8d238eC086daE9B75a00D9E74

James Harpur is a British-born Irish poet who has published eight books of poetry. He has won a number of awards, including the Michael Hartnett Award and the UK National Poetry Competition.Harpur's site: https://www.jamesharpur.com/---Become part of the Hermitix community:Hermitix Twitter - ⁠⁠ / hermitixpodcast⁠⁠ Hermitix Discord - ⁠⁠ / discord Support Hermitix:Hermitix Subscription - ⁠⁠https://hermitix.net/subscribe/⁠⁠ Patreon - ⁠⁠ www.patreon.com/hermitix⁠⁠ Donations: - ⁠⁠https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpod⁠⁠Hermitix Merchandise - ⁠⁠http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2⁠⁠Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLKEthereum Donation Address: 0xfd2bbe86d6070004b9Cbf682aB2F25170046A996

Jiddu Krishnamurti var en indisk filosof og spirituell lærer som utfordret konvensjonelle tankemønstre og sosiale normer. Hans bok Hva gjør du med livet ditt er en inngående utforskning av menneskets forhold til frihet, selvinnsikt og betydningen av å leve autentisk. Krishnamurti tar opp spørsmål som er dypt relevante både i eksistensielle filosofier og i moderne psykologi, særlig innenfor felter som selvrealisering og mindfulness. Han viser oss hvordan vi alltid ser oss selv og livet filtrert via erfaringer, normer, regler, kultur og tusenvis av andre påvirkninger. Vi ser ikke livet slik det er, men via et tykt filter som forkrøpler vår utsikt og innsikt. For å leve mer autentisk, og ikke havne i alle livsfellene som fører til stress, angst og psykisk uhelse, må vi ty til en form for radikal selvransakelse, og det blir tema i dagens episode av SinnSyn. Velkommen skal du være!Vil du ha mer psykologi og flere dypdykk i menneskets sjelsliv? Bli medlem på vårt Mentale Helsestudio.Last ned SinSyn-appen på www.sinnsyn.no/download/ Eller meld deg inn via www.patron.com/sinsyn Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bibliographie:_ "La première et la dernière liberté", discours de Jiddu Krishnamurti, éditions Le Livre de Poche. Musique: Altus (https://altusmusic.bandcamp.com/track/session-5) Narration et réalisation: Bruno Léger Production: Les mécènes du Vieux Sage Que règnent la paix et l'amour parmi tous les êtres de l'univers.  OM Shanti, Shanti, Shanti. 

Jiddu Krishnamurti en primera persona

Bibliographie: _ "La première et la dernière liberté", discours de Jiddu Krishnamurti, éditions Le Livre de Poche.   Musique: https://archive.org/details/freefloatingmusic032   Narration et réalisation: Bruno Léger   Production: Les mécènes du Vieux Sage   Que règnent la paix et l'amour parmi tous les êtres de l'univers.    OM Shanti, Shanti, Shanti.  

Wolfgang Tillmans talks to Ben Luke about his influences—from writers to musicians, film-makers and, of course, other artists—and the cultural experiences that have shaped his life and work. Tillmans, born in Remscheid, Germany, in 1968, has changed the history of photography. He has taken established genres of art and the photographic medium, from portraiture to still life, landscape, political subjects and abstraction, and relentlessly experimented with the framing, printing and presentation of his images and photographic objects. His subjects include everything from urgent imagery of social events like protests or club nights, formal portraits and experimental cameraless photography. From the very start of his now close to four-decade career, Tillmans has shown his works in installations that respond specifically to the intricacies of the spaces in which they are displayed, with the photographs presented in formats that range from postcard size to vast and enveloping prints. The images might abut the corner of a room, be hung high up the walls or unorthodoxly low, or adjacent to bureaucratic elements like fire exit signs. They might be organised in flurries or constellations, or in spare linear arrangements or grids. Through this process, Wolfgang consistently reenergises his archive, juxtaposing images taken years and sometimes decades apart. While photography has remained his primary medium, Wolfgang has steadily expanded his media, with video installation, text and sound and music gaining increasing prominence in his exhibitions. He discusses the early impact on him of seeing the work of Kurt Schwitters, his current interest in the paintings of Francisco de Zurbarán, his long association with the contemporary German artist Isa Genzken, a profound experience at a Laurie Anderson concert in 1986 and the influence of the Indian writer and philosopher, Jiddu Krishnamurti. Plus he gives insight into his life in the studio and answers our usual questions, including the ultimate: what is art for?Wolfgang Tillmans: Build From Here, Maureen Paley, London, 3 October–20 December; Ausstellung in Remscheid, Haus Cleff, Remscheid, until 4 January 2026; 36th Bienal São Paulo: Not every traveler walks the roads – On humanity as a practice, until 11 January 2026; Fictions of Display, MOCA Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, until 4 January 2026; Könnt ihr noch? – Kunst und Demokratie, Königsklasse, Schloss Herrenchiemsee, Munich, until 12 October 2025; On View: Begegnungen mit dem Fotografischen, Pinakothek der Moderne, Munich, until 12 October 2025 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Vince Fakhoury Horn: I was thinking about where to start with the 9th Jhāna, and I think the first thing to say is that the 9th Jhāna is not a state. So why in the world are we within a community of practice called The Jhāna Community, which is explicitly aimed at developing and cultivating certain states of mind, or states of consciousness, why would we be focusing on something which is not a state?Let me let me share a little bit where this term came from. So I'm borrowing this term from a researcher who I spoke to some months ago. This is a researcher working on a project studying advanced meditation. They were asking me about my experience with jhāna's and then asked, “Do you have any experience with anything that would be considered like a 9th Jhāna, or anything beyond the eight traditional jhānas.” And I had to think about that because I'd never heard the term, “the 9th jhāna.” I'd heard other things, weird things, but I hadn't heard that one before, so I thought about it and I was like, “Well, I guess the only thing I would describe as the 9th jhāna is just sort of resting in awareness, or just being open and not doing anything, just being”, what I would normally in my own models call Awareness Meditation, and that is the spirit of this exploration today.Want to explore the 9th jhāna with Vince Horn? Join him for another round of The 9th Jhāna in The Jhāna Community beginning September 30th, 2025. The 9th Jhāna is an exploration of how to explore these states of consciousness that arise in meditation naturally and organically when the mind and body are settled, through the doorway of a very different kind of meditation object, which is not an object at all. We take awareness as our “object.”Of course, awareness can't take itself as an object, right? If you could take awareness as an object, that wouldn't be awareness. It'd be some experience. With the 9th jhāna we're learning how to rest in awareness, to be aware of awareness. And there are lots of ways to do that, and there's lots of ways to think about that. So today I wanted to kind of just share a few different frames with you, uh, as an attempt to frame the unframeable. Awareness isn't something which we can frame properly because it's not an experience, or it's not a thing, or state. But we still have to talk about it. Because it's like the whole point of the Buddhist meditative tradition in a certain way. So how can we talk about something that doesn't fit into the normal categories of how we think about reality? One way I think we have to talk about this, and this is a longstanding conversation in the Buddhist contemplative tradition, is we have to talk about how we enter into this awareness of awareness. And there's a longstanding debate here between what in the Buddhist tradition they call the Sudden and Gradual schools. They're not actual real schools, okay. In fact, they're probably not really actual people who really believe either one of these extreme positions anymore.But, over thousands of years, you could say a dialogue has been happening across these different lines of looking at how the path unfolds. And one of the so-called schools says that the path is a gradual process, it's something that you develop through time. In a book called One Dharma by a Teacher named Joseph Goldstein, he does his best to try to make sense of these different approaches and he describes this kind of approach where you're gradually developing stage by stage or step by step. He calls this the Building From Below orientation. But there's also, as he describes it, a way to Swoop From Above with Awareness. You don't necessarily have to spend 20 years and you know, five Goenka retreats, or whatever the amount of stuff that you did, before you realized the basic truth about awareness, which is: good luck trying to not be aware. Ken Wilber, one of my early mentors, he used to always point to awareness, he'd say, “Try to stop being aware of my voice.” And Ken talks a lot [laughs] and he'd just keep talking, talking, talking about how you can't not be aware. And it's true, it's hard to shut awareness off.So here, how do we actually, suddenly realize that we're already aware? This is the Sudden School, which Joseph Goldstein described as Sweeping from Above. You could just realize it's already done. You're already aware, you're already awake. Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj, in a book called I Am That he said, “To be aware is to be awake. Unaware means asleep. You are aware anyhow, you need not try to be. What you need is to be aware of being aware. Be aware deliberately and consciously, broaden and deepen the field of awareness. You are always conscious of the mind, but you are not aware of yourself as being conscious.”I like this way of describing awareness practice, because in a way, he's integrating these two, the sudden and gradual approaches. He's not prioritizing one over the other. He's saying both are true. You're always conscious, right? So consciousness is always present, but you're not always aware that you're aware. You're not always conscious of your consciousness. And so there, that's the practice is being aware of being aware. That's it. That's what we're doing here. B. Alan Wallace in The Attention Revolution, another awesome Dharma book, that touches on awareness as a doorway into jhāna, he says, “In awareness of awareness, there is no intentional directing of attention. You simply rest in that flow of knowing, and from time to time gently recognize that you are aware.”I wish it were more complicated than that, sometimes I wish I could just lay it out like kind of like Daniel Ingram did in his book, Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha, and just give you the full, 400 page diagram detail of how to get into awareness. And I'm sure that book exists, and that might be a useful exercise. But for me, the practice is quite simple. And unfortunately, the thinking mind will tend to make this more complex than it is, and that tends to be one of the biggest obstacles that I've noticed in using awareness as a tool for entering into jhāna. So this is one way to look at what we're doing here with the 9th Jhāna. How is it that we're coming into this awareness? Gradually or all of a sudden. Another way of looking at awareness practice, I think that's very important is that if you are taking a gradual approach, if you feel like there's some kind of movement or development or progression through time, what I've noticed is that that progression often takes one of two forms, and this seems to largely depend on the person and the tradition that they're practicing in.One of the ways, in the Christian contemplative tradition, they call this Via Negativa. In the Hindu tradition, they call this Advaita, which is you take all of the experiences that are rising and you recognize that you are not any of those, because they're objects, because they're arising, because you can know them. That means they arise in time that they're changing, and they will vanish. This is the basic truth of vipassana, right? Mindfulness. Yeah, so we can recognize that and we recognize anything that we can be aware of is not ultimately who we are. This is the process of, Neti Neti, as it's said in Sanskrit, “Not this, Not this.”With this approach you're backing away from the untruth. You're backing away from everything that is not you. You're letting go of all those objects and just resting in awareness that's devoid of any characteristics. Devoid. That's important. This is the path of the void. Not this. Via Negativa. Then on the other side though, you have the opposite path, Via Positiva. “This too, This too.” Nothing is excluded. Anything that arises that appears to be apart from you, you include it in awareness. You fold it back into awareness and see that thing that I thought was out there, over here, this too! Shunryū Suzuki Roshi in Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind, he says, “That everything is included within your mind is the essence of mind.” So, here we're recognizing that everything that arises in the mind is the essence of mind.Another quote from Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj, in I Am That:“The mind produces thoughts ceaselessly, even when you do not look at them. When you know what is going on in your mind, you call it consciousness. That is your waking state–your consciousness shifts from sensation to sensation, from perception to perception, from idea to idea, in endless succession. Then comes awareness, the direct insight into the whole of consciousness, the totality of the mind. The mind is like a river, flowing ceaselessly in the bed of the body; you identify yourself for a moment with some particular ripple and call it: ‘my thought'. All you are conscious of is your mind; awareness is the cognizance of consciousness as a whole.”Awareness is the cognizance of consciousness as a whole. Again, we'll use this as our kind of broad definition for what it is that we're meditating on. And of course we don't meditate on awareness. We meditate as awareness. There's no way to take awareness as an object. You can only be that awareness.So how do you be aware? Well, you're already aware. How do you not be aware? That might be a more interesting question. How do we not be aware? How do we avoid this moment?So these are two approaches, “Not this, Not this” (via negativa) and “This too, This too.” (via positiva), are both are valid ways to realize Awareness. I remember the first time I really heard this spoken by someone I respected, it was a teacher at Naropa University. I was in this class called Contemplative Hinduism and learning about the different contemplative approaches in the Hindu tradition. My teacher was a woman named Sreedevi Bringi, and she grew up in India and her family, and her family was close friends with Jiddu Krishnamurti, so she grew up, hanging out with Krishnamurti in her family house. Okay, that should give you a little sense of her background.She said in India there are two basic approaches, and she described it in pretty much the same way I just described them to you, except she said with the Neti, Neti approach, she said in India we call this Advaita Vedanta, radical non-duality. And the other approach “This too, This too”, we call that Tantra. Vedanta and Tantra. And she said both of these are valid approaches. At the time that I heard that, it was really useful, because I'd taken the Via Negativa approach and I thought, “Well, this must be the only way.” I noticed in the beginning when everyone was sharing about your background, I should have probably asked when your first Goenka retreat was, because almost everyone here seems to have experienced that. And that very much is the Via Negativa approach, where you're just breaking down, deconstructing your experience, disidentifying, you could say dissociating from whatever arises. So this is also, I think, an important frame for understanding the 9th Jhāna, that there are different ways in, that are either about backing away from identification with anything, or moving toward identification with everything. Ultimately, I would suggest these lead to the same realizations. And then finally, I want to throw this last frame out to you, which is the Several Ways to Meditate framework. This is a framework that my wife, Emily Horn and I developed over many years now to kind of describe the various approaches to meditation that we have practiced, and we teach, to provide a schema for understanding all the different possible ways there are to do this, and how they connect and relate to each other.If you think for a moment of a hexagram, starting off with a very simple six-sided object. If you look at that hexagram, you can see that there's six points in the hexagram, and each of those points is a style of meditation or a way to meditate. You have Concentration Meditation, bringing attention to a single point. Mindfulness, where we're noticing sensations as they change. Heartfulness, inclining the mind toward opening the heart. Inquiry Meditation where we're using a question as a prompt for discovery, like "What is awareness?" or "Who is aware?" Then you have Imaginal Meditation where you're using internal imagery or other internal senses to kind of put yourself in a position, that you can only imagine, where you're more whole and integrated. And then finally we have Embodiment Meditation where you're working on inhabiting the body. Now obviously there's a lot of overlaps between these styles. It's not that they're completely separate. In fact, they do connect. And if you imagine this hexagram, every point connecting up to a single point, like a pyramid, except this is a hexagramic pyramid. That single point at the top, the apex, is Awareness. Awareness is the only way of meditating that doesn't have a focus. It's the only style of meditation where there's nothing to do, and thus awareness doesn't contradict any of these other styles of practice. You might be missing that you're aware while you're furiously meditating on your breath or something, you might actually miss that, really it's true. But you can be aware and breathe at the same time. Awareness is compatible with everything, and it's the common denominator of all these styles. It's the point that transcends and includes all these different ways to meditate. So in that sense, it's a kind of special approach. And because of that you can use any of those other styles of meditation, in combination with the intention to be aware of awareness, and you can practice that as a doorway into the 9th jhāna. So you can practice Mindful Awareness, you can use techniques that intentionally bring in mindfulness, and also point toward awareness. Or you could do a kind of inquiry into awareness. You could use inquiry meditation to, to hone in on the nature of awareness through asking questions. “What is aware of this experience right now?” Can you find that? You can just sit and be in your body. Embodied awareness. You can take awareness as your concentration object. Shamatha without a sign, which was mentioned earlier. You could move through the jhānas naturally and organically as you just rest in awareness, concentrated awareness. So I mention this model because I'm going to be pulling from a lot of these different techniques over the course of the next 12 weeks. And my hope is that by exploring this from different angles, you can find the approaches to awareness that work for you, to let you in, that are access points for you that are reliable and which you can deepen through. And my experience is sometimes people will find that access point in one place, and it might not be a Goenka retreat, it might be somewhere else. So, here I want to provide as many access points as possible while also continuing to keep the focus centered on the 9th Jhāna.Practice the 9th Jhāna in The Jhāna Community with Vince Fakhoury Horn. Next group starts on September 30th, 2025. Get full access to Buddhist Geeks at www.buddhistgeeks.org/subscribe

Indian writer Jiddu Krishnamurti famously said, “It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society”, and rightly so. Stress is everywhere, perhaps becoming the biggest crisis of our lifetime. While any health concern is taken seriously, mental health is often ignored. The problem is so big that it costs businesses Rs 1,10,000 crore annually. Clearly, there is a huge gap between awareness and action, along with the internalised shame in the victim. But what can be done to reduce this? In this episode, we are joined by Dr Shyam Bhat, Chairperson of Live Love Laugh, to delve deep into the practical ideas that companies can adopt to bridge this lacuna. He explains how there is no one size fits all approach. Listen in!

This episode begins by exploring Jiddu Krishnamurti's reflections on life, death, and daily renewal, and then weaves them together with Stoic wisdom from Seneca and the battlefield lessons of Sparta.Through vivid stories and timeless philosophy, it reminds us that freedom from the fear of death brings greater freedom in life, and that each day offers the chance to live a complete life anew.Ultimately, it's a call to greet each morning with gratitude, compassion, and the resolve to make the most of the time we've been given.

Lou Martin is a true modern-day Renaissance man whose journey has spanned continents and spiritual traditions. From meditating with Jiddu Krishnamurti as a teenager to his profound kundalini awakening in 1987, Lou's life has been a tapestry of deep spiritual exploration. He has channeled guides and worked with celebrated teachers such as Thich Nhat Hanh and the Dalai Lama, and is a dedicated student of A Course in Miracles. For decades, Lou has offered conscious channeling sessions across the U.S., Canada, and Europe.Now happily settled in West Cork, Ireland, Lou continues to share his wisdom through multiple creative outlets. He is the creator of the Awakened Spirits Network YouTube channel, hosts the Morning Poems & Prayers podcast, and is a singer-songwriter with three released singles. His music has taken him from local farmers' markets to world-famous Irish pubs, where he shares his art with a growing audience. Lou's life is a testament to the power of a deep spiritual practice and the creative expression that flows from it.AWAKENED SPIRITS NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/@awakenedspiritsnetwork4353 FACEBOOK - MORNING POEMS & PRAYERS LIVE M-TH 9AM UK/IRE https://www.facebook.com/lightheart2012 SUBSTACK.COM - DAILY MPP POSTS HERE lightheart2018.substack.com FACEBOOK LIFEWAVE TEAM IRELAND WHAT IS X39 PATCH https://www.facebook.com/groups/545064091741961LIFEWAVE STOREFRONT X39 PATCH https://lifewave.com/loumartin ALSO... thisisitinfo.com Visit Middle Earth Medicine to learn more and connect with Caroline.Your donations directly fuel the growth of this podcast! They allow Caroline to bring in even more wonderful teachers and inspiring guests and expand her reach to uplift even more listeners. Please show your support and become part of the magic! Donations of any amount are deeply appreciated. You can make a secure donation through PayPal using the link below.Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference! paypal.me/carolinecarey60 Thank you for your support in spreading the light of soul and spirituality. You can also join our community membership for deeper soul explorations: https://middleearthmedicine.com/mem-community/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sección Frases de gigantes del programa número 14 de La pregunta infinita: Identidad, autenticidad y la búsqueda de lo humano.

Delving into the profound teachings of J. Krishnamurti, David Silver and Raghu Markus explore timeless questions of existence, social ethics, and the deeper truths that shape our lives.Mindrolling is brought to you by Reunion. Reunion is offering $250 off any stay to the Love, Serve, Remember community. Simply use the code “BeHere250” when booking. Disconnect from the world so you can reconnect with yourself at Reunion. Hotel | www.reunionhotelandwellness.com Retreats | www.reunionexperience.orgThis time on Mindrolling, Raghu and David have a discussion about:The intellectual essence of Krishnamurti initially alienated David and Raghu, and what drew them back inKrishnamurti's unique childhood and emergence as a "chosen one" by the Theosophical SocietyThe profound lifelong friendship of Aldous Huxley and Krishnamurti Krishnamurti's teachings on avoiding spiritual bypassing and false ego-driven enlightenmentThe danger of over-identification with any religion, group, or ideology, and how this creates separationUnderstanding that we all have the ultimate truth within us and are all one with everything Krishnamurti's message that comparison to others, the past, or ideals is a major root of sufferingKrishnamurti's critique of “social morality,” which often upholds greed, violence, and systemic divisionSeeing through the division that society has nurtured and amplified over centuries Embracing our personal journeys and seeing this life as one chapter in a larger, sacred storyPracticing mindfulness as a path to seeing the truth and being with all of our experiences fullyDavid recommends reading Joseph Goldstein's book, Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to AwakeningAbout J. Krishnamurti:For nearly six decades until his passing in 1986 at the age of ninety, Jiddu Krishnamurti traversed the globe, delivering spontaneous and captivating discourses to large audiences. Krishnamurti assumed the role of an investigator rather than an authority figure, encouraging individuals to question assumptions and explore the depths of their consciousness. His extensive body of work, estimated at over 100 million words, spans more than six decades of relentless inquiry and dialogue. His teachings, compiled in numerous books and translated into multiple languages, continue to inspire seekers worldwide, inviting them to embark on a profound journey of self-discovery and understanding. J. Krishnamurti's legacy endures as a guiding light, offering timeless wisdom for those who dare to challenge conventional thinking and explore the complexities of existence.Listen to Krishnamurti's lectures on the Be Here Now Network's Freedom From The Known podcast.About David Silver:David Silver is the former co-host of the Mindrolling podcast. He is a filmmaker and director, most recently coming out with Brilliant Disguise. Brilliant Disguise tells the unique story of a group of inspired Western spiritual seekers from the 60s, who in meeting the great American teacher, Ram Dass, followed him to India to meet his Guru, Neem Karoli Baba, familiarly known as Maharaj-ji. Two days before he left his body, Maharaj-ji instructed K.C. Tewari to take care of the Westerners, which he did resolutely until the day he died in 1997. Silver's #1 charting MGM/UA/Warners film, “The Compleat Beatles” is the critically acclaimed biopic movie about history's most famous band. The term ‘rockumentary' was first applied to this two-hour movie. Rolling Stone recently described the film as a “masterwork.” Silver's Warner Brothers' feature film, “No Nukes” also started the whole trend of music/activism feature documentaries. "He was an advocate, always, of looking at yourself. He felt that the deeper truths about the meaning of living do not come from anyone else, even if the greatest guru is in front of you, it still comes from what you yourself are truly embedded in properly. In other words, that's what you believe when you're alone, silent, not having to impress, not having to compare."– David SilverSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daily QuoteI don't mind what happens. That is the essence of inner freedom. It is a timeless spiritual truth: release attachment to outcomes, deep inside yourself, you'll feel good no matter what. (Jiddu Krishnamurti)Poem of the Day四时田园杂兴范成大Beauty of Words挑山工冯骥才

Daily QuoteI don't mind what happens. That is the essence of inner freedom. It is a timeless spiritual truth: release attachment to outcomes, deep inside yourself, you'll feel good no matter what. (Jiddu Krishnamurti)Poem of the DayThe Great FigureBy William Carlos WilliamsBeauty of Words母亲做的菜梁实秋

Mick Brown's The Nirvana Express: How the Search for Enlightenment Went West (Oxford UP, 2023) is a riveting account about the West's engagement with Eastern spirituality across a century. It traces the life of multiple characters that intersected across time and space to create a network of interlinking stories about saints, salesmen and scoundrels all involved in spirituality. From Edwin Arnold, whose epic poem about the life of the Buddha became a best-seller in Victorian Britain, to the occultist and magician Aleister Crowley; and from spiritual teachers Jiddu Krishnamurti, Meher Baba and Ramana Maharshi to the controversial guru Rajneesh, The Nirvana Express is an exhilarating, sometimes troubling journey through the West's search for enlightenment. Archit Nanda is PhD scholar in Comparative Literature at Queen Mary University of London. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Mick Brown's The Nirvana Express: How the Search for Enlightenment Went West (Oxford UP, 2023) is a riveting account about the West's engagement with Eastern spirituality across a century. It traces the life of multiple characters that intersected across time and space to create a network of interlinking stories about saints, salesmen and scoundrels all involved in spirituality. From Edwin Arnold, whose epic poem about the life of the Buddha became a best-seller in Victorian Britain, to the occultist and magician Aleister Crowley; and from spiritual teachers Jiddu Krishnamurti, Meher Baba and Ramana Maharshi to the controversial guru Rajneesh, The Nirvana Express is an exhilarating, sometimes troubling journey through the West's search for enlightenment. Archit Nanda is PhD scholar in Comparative Literature at Queen Mary University of London. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Mick Brown's The Nirvana Express: How the Search for Enlightenment Went West (Oxford UP, 2023) is a riveting account about the West's engagement with Eastern spirituality across a century. It traces the life of multiple characters that intersected across time and space to create a network of interlinking stories about saints, salesmen and scoundrels all involved in spirituality. From Edwin Arnold, whose epic poem about the life of the Buddha became a best-seller in Victorian Britain, to the occultist and magician Aleister Crowley; and from spiritual teachers Jiddu Krishnamurti, Meher Baba and Ramana Maharshi to the controversial guru Rajneesh, The Nirvana Express is an exhilarating, sometimes troubling journey through the West's search for enlightenment. Archit Nanda is PhD scholar in Comparative Literature at Queen Mary University of London. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

I'm so excited to share this transformative conversation on how to create everyday miracles in your life now!   I had the privilege of sitting down with Hakim Hamza, bestselling author of The Eternal Within, for a deep dive into practical techniques, mindset shifts, and daily practices inspired by A Course in Miracles.    Whether you're new to the Course or a seasoned student, this conversation will give you powerful tools to elevate your everyday experience and transform your reality.   And help you experience more miracles! ⚡️   About Hakim Hamza: Hakim was born in 1987 to a Swedish mother and an Egyptian father, and  grew up in Sweden. Growing up multiculturally fostered a deep awareness of the vastness of human experience. Hakim holds a bachelor's degree in social psychology.   Driven by a profound yearning for something eternal that transcends limitations, I immersed myself in diverse Eastern philosophies. I have explored the teachings of Osho (Rajneesh), Papaji, Ramana Maharshi, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Acharya Prashant, and Adyashanti, among others. ​ Through this journey, he understood how spiritual truths can be applied to everyday life. Even though not Eastern, he finally found "A Course in Miracles" (ACIM) and the work of Dr. Kenneth Wapnick, who taught it. The Course has resonated with him more than any other teaching; hence, it has become his primary spiritual practice.  

On this episode of The Zach Show, Chris Cooper and Zach discuss Chris' debut fiction novel 'Crazy By Conscious,' how Chris saved his brother's life in the hospital, the philosophy of Jiddu Krishnamurti, the collapse of Bed Bath & Beyond, Chris' firsthand New Jersey drone/UAP experience, and more.  Guest bio: Chris Cooper is an award-winning writer, novelist, and performance coach. SUPPORT THE AUXORO PODCAST BY SUBSCRIBING TO AUXORO PREMIUM (BONUS EPISODES & EXCLUSIVE CONTENT): https://auxoro.supercast.com/ CHRIS COOPER LINKS:Crazy By Conscious: https://www.amazon.com/Crazy-Conscious-Chris-Cooper/dp/1960882163Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/coopd88/The Coop Gym: https://www.instagram.com/_thecoop_gym/Finn Almost Buys A Goldfish: https://expatpress.com/finn-almost-buys-a-goldfish-chris-cooper/Thirst: https://themetaworker.com/2023/10/09/thirst-by-chris-cooper/The Swim: https://acrossthemargin.com/the-swim/ AUXORO SOCIAL LINKS: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/auxoroYouTube: https://bit.ly/3CLjEqFFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/auxoromagNewsletter: https://www.auxoro.com/thesourceYouTube: https://bit.ly/3CLjEqF To support the show, please leave a review on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. This nudges the algorithm to show The AUXORO Podcast to more new listeners and is the best way to help the show grow. It takes 30 seconds and the importance of getting good reviews cannot be overstated.  Thank you for your support: Review us on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/458nbhaReview us on Spotify: https://bit.ly/43ZLrAt   

In this final installment of our biography of Jiddu Krishnamurti, the teacher disbands the Order of the Star and is banished from Theosophical Society Headquarters. He becomes an advisor to Indira Ghandi and questions whether his strange path to knowledge can ever be replicated.

As a child, Jiddu Krishnamurti was named the vessel for the World Teacher by leading figures in the Theosophical Society, namely Charles Leadbetter and Annie Besant. He came to regard Besant as a second mother but his relationship with Leadbetter was more complicated. Leadbetter wrote a serialized account of Krishnamurti's previous lives, calling him Alcyone, and helped Krishnamurti make contact with the ascended masters of theosophy. But Krishnamurti and his family were conflicted by the way he had been set up to become the religious leader of thousands and thousands of people worldwide.