POPULARITY
3 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
2 episodes with Pitter
Přemysl Pitter prokázal tváří v tvář smrtelnému nebezpečí nezměrnou odvahu. Doslova ze země dokázal spolu s Olgou Fierzovou vydupat sociální práci, která pomohla stovkám a možná tisícům dětí. Pečoval o české, německé a židovské děti. V exilu pak spolupracoval s rádii Svobodná Evropa a BBC. V roce 1964 dostal ocenění Spravedlivý mezi národy. V roce 1991 mu český prezident propůjčil Řád TGM in memoriam. Český protestantský kazatel, mírový aktivista a pracovník s dětmi, "muž proti proudu" Přemysl Pitter se narodil před 130 lety.
6/5/25: Ashfield human rights atty Laura Pitter & Freedom Now Ex Dir Andrea Prasow: jailed journalists. Susanne Personette & Lois Barber: Amherst Plein Air Society's show at Forbes. Rep Jim McGovern: democracy in peril. ABA Human Rights Hero Maria Foscarinis: "And Housing for All: The Fight to End Homelessness in America."
5/9/25: MTA Pres Max Page: a Fair Share from billionaires. Human Rts atty Laura Pitter: birthright citizenship at SCOTUS next week. Northampton Bike Week w/ George Kohout, Pres of Nhmptn Trials, & Tom Draudt.
4/3/25: Human Rts Atty Laura Pitter: Trump using anti-terror laws to silence & punish critics. Martín Espada launching "Jailbreak of Sparrows" @ Raven Books, Shelburne Falls. Congressman Jim McGovern: Sen Cory Booker's historic speech, "Hands Off" rallies, & tariffs. Ruth Griggs just named 2025 Jazz Hero by Jazz Journalist Ass'n.
Heute mit Käpt`n Blaubär und kleinen Raubrittern, einem Ritter namens Pitter und natürlich mit der Maus. Von WDR.
3/6/25: Human Rights Atty Laura Pitter: Trump-Musk destroying USAID, deserting the world & threatening Sanctuary Cities. Rich Michelson & Eric Lesser -- “Next Year in the White House: Barack Obama's First Presidential Seder.” Rep Jim McGovern: Republicans gutting the gov't. What hope remains? Ruth Griggs w/ rising star pianist Sean Mason -- coming to the Drake.
Die Maus zum Hören - Lach- und Sachgeschichten. Heute: mit Wolken und ihrer Form, einer besonderen Glocke im Kölner Dom, einem kranken Alpakababy, mit Nina natürlich mit der Maus und dem Elefanten. Frage des Tages - Warum sind die Wolken so unterschiedlich? (06:38) Zeitsprung – Schwindelfrei (14:16) Tierische Doku - Alpakababy im Auto (23:25) Maus-Reportage - Der Wärter vom dicken Pitter (45:16) Von Isabel Hecker.
1/3/25: MTA Pres Max Page: change K-12 funding & other 2025 priorities. Bill & Buz: the meaning of the oath that Congress takes today. Donnabelle Casis w/ New England Visionary Artists Museum Co-directors Michael Tillyer & Susan Foley. Community Action's Claire Higgins on Housing. Human Rights Attorney Laura Pitter: the issue is genocide.
V historii existují příběhy, které přesahují chápání lidí i v současnosti. Takový je i příběh náboženského myslitele, pacifisty a sociálního pracovníka Přemysla Pittra. „Byl nonkonformním člověkem, nositelem modelu křesťanské lásky a toho, že jsme schopni ji v sobě nacházet a probouzet,“ hodnotí ho v pořadu Jak to bylo doopravdy publicista Pavel Kosatík, autor monografie Sám proti zlu.Všechny díly podcastu Jak to bylo doopravdy můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.
12/13/24: Rep Natalie Blais: Trump v. Massachusetts, climate, & econ devel. MTA's Max Page: HS diplomas for students MCAS failed. Donnabelle Casis w/ HCC's Taber Art Gallery Dir Rachel Rushing on the exhibit "Thrive." Smith Prof Steven Heydemann & human rts atty Laura Pitter: Assad's fall & Syria's future.
In this bonus Q&A with Prudence, she shares:Her proudest moment and biggest failure in her career so farA trend that she is following in Talent Development right nowThe biggest challenge she sees in Talent Development todayBooks that have made a big impact on her lifeOne piece of career advice she has for yoPrudence Pitter is a CHRO, Global Keynote Speaker, Board Member, and experienced business executive with over two and a half decades of progressive Human Resource leadership experience across several industries. She has worked extensively with Boards of Directors, leadership teams, and various business leaders in optimizing the culture, morale and productivity of their workforces. In addition, she has successfully and personally managed mergers and acquisitions, openings and closings, union negotiations, building and relocating corporate headquarters operations, associate communications, public and community relations as well as building and restructuring HR teams.Connect with Andy Storch here:WebsiteLinkedInJoin us in the Talent Development Think Tank Community!Connect with Prudence Pitter:LinkedInWebsite
11/22/24: Dangerous recess appts. MTA Pres Max Page: strikes, no family medical leave & subminimum wage. Donnabelle Casis w/ Jason Montgomery, 50 Arrow Gallery: "Words" & art. Jillian Morgan: March for the Food Bank. Local human rts atty Laura Pitter: coming assault on rts.
Today we're diving deep into the intricate world of workplace wellness and employee well-being with our special guest, Prudence Pitter. Prudence, the Global Head of HR for Amazon Web Services (AWS) overseeing sectors like Auto Manufacturing, Healthcare, and Life Sciences, brings over 20 years of rich HR experience to the table.In this episode, we'll explore:The profound impact of personal connections in the workplaceThe significance of genuine concern from leadersThe power of vulnerability in building strong teamsChallenges of mental health, both in our personal lives and within the organizational framework Effective strategies like gratitude practices, employee assistance programs, and innovative wellness initiativesJoin us as Prudence shares her personal journey of managing her son's mental health challenges and how it shaped her focus on creating supportive work environments. We'll also delve into successful wellness practices at AWS, from no-meeting days to running clubs, and discuss how leaders can lead by example to foster a culture of well-being and resilience.Prudence Pitter is a CHRO, Global Keynote Speaker, Board Member, and experienced business executive with over two and a half decades of progressive Human Resource leadership experience across several industries. She has worked extensively with Boards of Directors, leadership teams, and various business leaders in optimizing the culture, morale and productivity of their workforces. In addition, she has successfully and personally managed mergers and acquisitions, openings and closings, union negotiations, building and relocating corporate headquarters operations, associate communications, public and community relations as well as building and restructuring HR teams.Connect with Andy Storch here:WebsiteLinkedInJoin us in the Talent Development Think Tank Community!Connect with Prudence Pitter:LinkedInWebsite
Subscribe Apple | Google | Spotify | Stitcher | iHeart Support The Daily Gardener Buy Me A Coffee Connect for FREE! The Friday Newsletter | Daily Gardener Community Botanical History On This Day 1783 General George Washington penned his historic Farewell Address to his troops at Rockingham, marking a pivotal moment in American history. Today, this historic site continues to tell its story not just through its architecture, but through its meticulously maintained period gardens that offer visitors a living connection to our nation's past. 1860 Warren Manning, a visionary landscape architect, is born. His birth was commemorated by his father with the planting of an elm tree - a fitting tribute for a man who would dedicate his life to transforming America's landscapes. Grow That Garden Library™ Read The Daily Gardener review of The Landscape of Home by Edmund Hollander Buy the book on Amazon: The Landscape of Home by Edmund Hollander Today's Botanic Spark 1897 On this day, Ruth Pitter, a remarkable British poet whose deep connection to nature, primarily through her beloved Hainault Forest, was born. Thanks for listening to The Daily Gardener And remember: For a happy, healthy life, garden every day.
Have you ever been “Pitterized”?' If you have, you know exactly what I mean! If you're not sure what I'm talking about, you will after today's show. My guest today Is Pitter Goughnour, and she is well known for Pitterizing people! She has photographed people from all walks of life; actors, athletes, business people, politicians, men & women, young and old. Pitter has the unique ability to bring out the very best in all of them through her photography. She shows people that they are special, that they do have a story and has literally changed lives in the process. To say Pitter has led an interesting life, so far, is such an understatement! And she is far from stopping and I, for one, can't wait to see what happens next! But it hasn't been without serious challenges in her life. We will talk about some of those, challenges that could have stopped her, but didn't. In fact, they often gave her a reason to persevere. You will enjoy meeting Pitter, and even if you know her, will likely learn something new. While she may be small in stature, barely five feet tall, even with her signature high heels, she has a bigger than life personality, and an enthusiasm for life that is inspiring and contagious! In our episode, you will laugh, you may cry, but you will definitely have a better day, just being around Pitter! Guest: Pitter Goughnour Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pitterproductionsphotography Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pitterg/ Phone: 404-313-1022 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/pitter-kalpak-goughnour-a1750324/ Sponsors: Lake Oconee Bistro; Tim Broyles State Farm; Reynolds Community Radio; Simplify AI Academy https://www.lakeoconeebistro.com/ https://mydowntownagency.com/ https://reynoldscommunityradio.com/ https://simplifyai.academy/
Have you ever been “Pitterized”?' If you have, you know exactly what I mean! If you're not sure what I'm talking about, you will after today's show. My guest today Is Pitter Goughnour, and she is well known for Pitterizing people! She has photographed people from all walks of life; actors, athletes, business people, politicians, men & women, young and old. Pitter has the unique ability to bring out the very best in all of them through her photography. She shows people that they are special, that they do have a story and has literally changed lives in the process. To say Pitter has led an interesting life, so far, is such an understatement! And she is far from stopping and I, for one, can't wait to see what happens next! But it hasn't been without serious challenges in her life. We will talk about some of those, challenges that could have stopped her, but didn't. In fact, they often gave her a reason to persevere. You will enjoy meeting Pitter, and even if you know her, will likely learn something new. While she may be small in stature, barely five feet tall, even with her signature high heels, she has a bigger than life personality, and an enthusiasm for life that is inspiring and contagious! In our episode, you will laugh, you may cry, but you will definitely have a better day, just being around Pitter! Guest: Pitter Goughnour Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pitterproductionsphotography Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pitterg/ Phone: 404-313-1022 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/pitter-kalpak-goughnour-a1750324/ Sponsors: Lake Oconee Bistro; Tim Broyles State Farm; Reynolds Community Radio; Simplify AI Academy https://www.lakeoconeebistro.com/ https://mydowntownagency.com/ https://reynoldscommunityradio.com/ https://simplifyai.academy/
We're at the end of an era. This is a goodbye to Simplify to Scale. And a hello to what's next. Something better. Tune in to this week's podcast episode to hear why we're no longer going to publish this podcast, and what's going to replace it. If you wanted the google document to the new offer I mentioned in this podcast episode, message me on Instagram (@katarapis) with the phrase "REVENUE LEAP" and I'll send it over! Only 15 Founding Member spots, and already 30%+ sold out already. Pitter patter! Again.. Thank you for joining me on my podcasting journey, and I hope to see you inside Revenue Leap! Over + out, Kat xx
The prison system keeps millions of families from celebrating Father's Day together. For Alexia Pitter of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, separation from her father, Gasi Pitter, has been a lifelong reality. Kept from even embracing her father during prison visits as a child, Alexia's struggle to build and maintain a relationship with Gasi has required taking on the entire prison system. After believing for many years her father would never be released, Alexia is now fighting for her father's release. Rattling the Bars explores this story of a brave daughter's love, and one family's determination to resist.Additional links/info:Sign the petition to Gov. Pritzker demanding Gasi Pitter receive clemency.Studio Production: David HebdenPost-Production: Cameron GranadinoJoin this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrmm_7RDZJeQzq2-wvmjueg/joinThe Real News is an independent, viewer-supported, radical media network. Help us expand our in-depth analysis and coverage from Baltimore to Bangladesh by subscribing and becoming a member today!Donate: https://therealnews.com/donate-ytSign up for our newsletter: https://therealnews.com/nl-ytBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-real-news-podcast--2952221/support.
The prison system keeps millions of families from celebrating Father's Day together. For Alexia Pitter of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, separation from her father, Gasi Pitter, has been a lifelong reality. Kept from even embracing her father during prison visits as a child, Alexia's struggle to build and maintain a relationship with Gasi has required taking on the entire prison system. After believing for many years her father would never be released, Alexia is now fighting for her father's release. Rattling the Bars explores this story of a brave daughter's love, and one family's determination to resist.Additional links/info:Sign the petition to Gov. Pritzker demanding Gasi Pitter receive clemency.Studio Production: David HebdenPost-Production: Cameron GranadinoJoin this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrmm_7RDZJeQzq2-wvmjueg/joinThe Real News is an independent, viewer-supported, radical media network. Help us expand our in-depth analysis and coverage from Baltimore to Bangladesh by subscribing and becoming a member today!Donate: https://therealnews.com/donate-ytSign up for our newsletter: https://therealnews.com/nl-ytBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/rattling-the-bars--4799829/support.
Be Green With Amy - Plant Based Nutrition, Weight Loss, Cooking, Traveling and more!
Want to learn a plant-based chef's favorite kitchen gadgets plus hacks & tips to cooking & meal prepping? Join us as the amazing Chef Vicky Brett-Gach showcases her top gadget picks & shares expert tips, including a recipe demo for Espresso Oatmeal Cookies! Watch full episode here!
Assistent des Kölner Dombaumeisters stellt die Kölner Domglocken vor. Das Domgeläut zählt zu den beeindruckendsten weltweit und ist vor allem wegen der Petersglocke, der tontiefsten freischwingenden Glocke der Welt, bekannt.
When you've got a killer offer, it makes your "marketing job" a heck of a lot easier as an expert coach. This week, I'm peeling back the curtains of *two major changes* we've made to the mastermind so that we're making it easier for people to join *and* stay And the proof is in the pudding - 4 days into the new month, and we're already 50% sold out of our monthly mastermind spots (we open up only a select few every month) And mastermind clients are *already* renewing, even though they still have weeks or even months left in the mastermind. Tune in, so you can get your creative juices flowing in how *you* can also make it easier for high-value clients to buy from you, and stay working with you. PS. Message me "MASTERMIND" on Instagram (@katarapis) or Facebook to join us, or for more info. 50% sold out already - with weeks left to go in the month. Once the remaining spots are gone, they're gone. Pitter patter xx
Welcome again to the new "Poetry Thursday" feature of The Inklings Variety Hour. This week, we're reading a poem by Ruth Pitter, someone who was not an Inkling but knew C.S. Lewis and a few of the other Inklings. I had Don W. King on the show to talk about her, and you can find that interview here. You can find the poem I read here, by the way. And here's a book of Pitter's poetry. I hope you enjoy--if you do, please leave a five-star review on iTunes so that others will be more likely to find the show. Also, please feel free to write me at inklingsvarietyhour@gmail.com if you have ideas for poems you would like to hear read on the show. The idea for the format of Poetry Thursday is ripped pretty shamelessly from The Daily Poem, which is a great podcast.
Black North Americans face massive and disproportionate barriers to the safe and free enjoyment of public spaces — particularly on North American streets and roads. But despite mountains of research on racial disparities in jaywalking stops, police brutality, traffic violence, and so much more, we still don't have a complete picture of what it's really like to be Black in the public realm, especially as that identity intersects with everything else North Americans might be. Today, we sit down with placemaker and mobility justice icon Jay Pitter to talk about why she's launching the 'Being Black in Public' survey, which hopes to bring that conversation back to the center of the discourse — and inspire policymakers to adopt new strategies and approaches to "transform Black public space precarity into equitable and joyful public space through policy reform." And along the way, we also chat about her path to this work, how urbanism has (and hasn't) changed since the murder of George Floyd, why we need to talk more about "the cost of advocacy."
Normalizing the conversation around employee well-being is one positive outcome that came out of the pandemic. Businesses now understand the role they have in supporting employee well-being and the bottom line cost of ignoring this area. In this episode of Get Reworked, AWS global head of HR Prudence Pitter discusses what AWS is doing to support employee well-being. Listen: Get Reworked Full Episode List "A leader who can share, 'I had this deliverable that I missed, because I got to this location, my luggage was not there. It caused a whole ripple effect where I was not able to be productive for two days. And so this is how I bounce back.' It's important for leaders to share some of the personal things that they're OK with sharing that help others recognize that it's normal, not only some of the ways that professionally they have fallen, if you will, but also importantly, how they bounce back. What are the ways that they redeem themselves. And I think that's a very powerful story to tell," said Prudence. Highlights of the conversation include: Why it's important to build accountability around well-being initiatives. Why well-being accounts for the whole person, both in and out of work. How well-being initiatives will not go anywhere if they ignore the ways the workplace is impacting well-being. Why leaders need to model the behavior they're promoting. How to normalize the conversation around well-being to remove any lingering stigma. Plus, hosts Siobhan Fagan and Nidhi Madhavan talk with Prudence about identifying where to focus well-being efforts, why some leaders may need coaching to have difficult conversations, and if discussing well-being without following through does more harm than good. Listen in for more.
How much thought should go into book cover selection? Today's guest shares five aspects we need to be clear on to have successful sales. Welcome to Your Best Writing Life, an extension of the Blue Ridge Mountains Christian Writers Conference held in the beautiful Blue Ridge Mts of NC. I'm your host, Linda Goldfarb.Today's guest is Samantha Evans – Sam's book Love Letters to Miscarriage Moms won second place in the Golden Scroll Awards for 2023. She and her husband live in Simpsonville, SC. Their cross-country move included two vehicles, three daughters, two cats—Pitter and Patter, and their husky. Sam was overruled in her campaign to name the dog Onomatopoeia. Five aspects to consider when creating your book cover to maximize sales. The Title is our First Hook Think in Terms of Thumbnails Book cover Color Matters Clear the Clutter Compare Shoppers vs. Readers LINKSMore About Samantha EvansSamantha Evan's NewsletterSamantha Evans' WebsiteSamantha Evans' PDF Chapter GiveawaySamantha Evans on Twitter Samantha Evans on Author Central Samantha Evans on FacebookSamantha Evans on Instagram Samantha Evans on YouTube If you enjoy Your Best Writing Life's content- consider a monthly donation through Patreon. Support Your Best Writing Life podcast. Linda would love to hear your thoughts about this episode.About your host - Linda GoldfarbBesides hosting Your Best Writing Life, Linda Goldfarb is a multi-published award-winning author, audiobook narrator, international speaker, board-certified Christian life coach, co-owner, co-founder of the LINKED® Personality System, and co-author of the LINKED® Quick Guide to Personality series.Linda and her hubby, Sam, are empty nesters leading full lives. With four adult children and 15 grandbabies– life is a new adventure every day. She loves sipping frothed coffee with friends, traveling the countryside with Sam, and sharing transparent moments with family.Visit Your Best Writing Life website.Join our Facebook group, Your Best Writing LifeAbout your host - Linda GoldfarbAwarded the Spark Media 2022 Most Bing-Worthy PodcastAwarded the Spark Media 2023 Fan Favorites Best Solo Podcast
Former federal prosecutor Robert Mintz, a partner at McCarter & English, discusses the Special Counsel giving Mark Meadows, Donald Trump's former Chief of Staff, immunity in the January 6th case. Bob Van Voris, Bloomberg legal reporter, discusses the testimony of Sam Bankman-Fried. June Grasso hosts. FULL TRANSCRIPT: This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio. We had begun our jury selection process this morning, but I've been informed that there is a change of plea, and then there was another change of plea and another as the dominoes started falling in the Georgia racketeering case accusing Donald Trump and eighteen others of scheming to keep Trump in power after he lost the twenty twenty election. How do you plead to count fifteen conspiracy to commit filing false documents in indictment number two three SC one eight, eight, nine, four seven guilty. Four have now pleaded guilty, including three lawyers. Sidney Powell pleaded guilty to six misdemeanors last Thursday. Kenneth Chesborough pleaded to one felony the next day, and on Tuesday, Jenna Ellis pleaded to one felony. Tearfully, I believe in and I value election integrity. If I knew then what I know now, I would have declined to represent Donald Trump in these post selection challenges. I look back on this whole experience with deep remorse. Here to discuss how all this flipping affects the case against Trump is Michael Moore of Moore Hall, the former US Attorney for the Middle District of Georgia. So Michael, four down, fifteen to go. How significant are these please? I think it's significant anytime that you have a co defendive flip, and the lawyers flipping are a little bit of a different bird baby than we normally see. When I listened to miss Ellis and the charges against her, you heard a lot about the Trump campaign, You heard about her direction from others. She called the more senior, more experienced lawyers, and that seems to me probably where the biggest jeopardy lies, and that is with those lawyers who have instructed her to do something. So it sounded like that would be potentially mister Eastmann and mister Giuliani. And of course if they have pressure on them and they were then to cooperate, then they may get to the next level, which would be closer I think to the former president. These are all sweetheart deals, aren't they? The lawyer's deals they are. They are unusually liked. I mean, remember that this case had been tagged as essentially the largest election fraud case in history or something like that, and it's will be a massive reco case, and people are basically walking away with a slap on the wrist. They up with probation, no jail time, and a first offender plea, which means that at the end of a certain period of their probation and the completion of those requirements, the charges are since the dismissed, so that with no record, they can vote, they can have a gun, they can do all those things once they have completed the requirements that the court set out. So they're unusually light, and they are especially like when you compare them with the sentences received by people who were involved at the Capitol on January the sixth, many of whom had jail sentences, some of them very significant. So it's maybe a little bit like the architects of the building are not going to jail, the construction workers who worked on the building are. That's sort of how I see it. So I can see why Willis gave the deals at this point to Powell and Chesbro so that she wouldn't have to go to trial against them early and reveal evidence to Trump. But why give a deal such a good deal to Jenna Ellis? I think probably she has made some statements that the ba will find useful against other people in the indictment. I don't know necessarily that that's Trump, but I think she probably gave them enough information to at least move forward. And also too, I mean, she was essentially a mouthpiece for other folks involved with the campaign, and her culpability I think was probably less than other people who may have been more of a puppet master than she was. CNN I believe is reporting that Willis is talking to six more defendants who will be left to go to trial once it comes time for trial. I mean, does she have a number in mind besides Trump? I think maybe a half dozen people or a few left that will be left standing. And those may be Trump and Juliani, that may be one Eastman, maybe another, people who think they have different constitutional arguments to make. They may be stronger arguments. It will be interesting to see how Metas is involved. I mean, we've heard that he was offered some of me into your cut a deal with Jack Smith. That's very interesting to me given the statements that he has made in the Georgia case, especially during his motion to remove the case to federal court. And you know, essentially he came to Atlanta in federal court and said everything I was doing was lawful. This is part of my job and it's protected activity, and it should entitle me as a federal official to move my case to federal court. And it sounds like to the contrary. When he got to Washington, d C. He decided that he wanted to cut a deal with the special counsel and tell him that, well, I don't know that I was doing the right thing, and I tried to tell the former presence that he was telling lies or whatever. I'm not quoting again, but something to that effect. I don't think those are necessarily consistent positions, and it'll be interesting to see how that plays out. So I don't know if mss Willis at this point, given the objections that he made to have his case tried in Fulton County, will look a favorably on a potential plya offer from him. So he may be one of the few that remain. That's really interesting because he has a very experienced attorney representing him. Do you let your client testify in a federal case to something that's going to cause you jeopardy in a state case? Yeah, I don't think you do. And I think that's the problem. And I do think he has a very good lawyer. I just think some of the statements that he may have made in the federal court here in Atlanta may not be exactly consistent with positions that he has taken to the special counsel. And I don't know how you claim that what you were doing was part of your actual lawful role as a chief of staff then suggest somehow that what you were doing, you know you had objections to because you thought your boss was not tell the truth in this kind of thing. So those will be maybe inconsistencies, and what we have to see actually the substance of each statement side by side. We haven't seen those yet. But any inconsistencies certainly give room to attack credibility with a witness, and may give fodder to a defense attorney to raise objections, and certainly may give some interest at least to a prosecutor to the side when or not you know that witness needs to be put on, is a cooperating witness, or with that witness independent needs to simply move forward toward trial. So this scenario is what they think about when they say the dominoes are falling, Well, it is. You know, if you think about a line of dominoes, a circle of dominoes or whatever, you know, you can pick a domino in the middle of the line and push it to the right or the left, and only the ones in the direction that's falling are going to continue to fall. And so that's why prosecutors try to work from the bottom up. They want to push some that has information at the bottom to try to get to the top. And some people argue you should work your way down. That's not necessarily tear to those people who are much less culpable, but you push generally from the bottom of the top. Cut deals with the people who are less colpable to try to get people who are really the masterminds or the more guilty of the organization. Here, I think there has been some middle of the line pushing, if you will, and the dominoes have fallen, maybe in one direction, which is why I think you saw ultimately deal cut with Jenna Ellis. Now whether or not she then also can have information toward the top, I don't know. But when we saw Ms Powell, mister chesbro Ls, you know, in Er Please, I think that was a section maybe of this arrangement of dominoes and arrangement of dependence, and that sort of has now concluded itself. But for the other lawyers who remain in the case, the key will be in the bridge the prosecutor will have to make will be getting from those folks in fact, to the people at the top of the line, And the question is what information do they have that will get in there. I don't know if miss Powell has information about that or not. She was president of meeting. She may have information about who said what. At the same time, I don't think that she's gonna be able to put the former president's things with prints on Coffee County as we get there, I do think, and I thought this was sort of telling of the things to come. When Miss Ellis made the comment that she was simply doing what she had been advised to do, I think you're hearing a preview of the defense we're going to hear from the former president. That is, in fact, I was simply doing what my lawyers told me I should do, or what I had a right to do. I was simply following legal advice at the time. And then I think we open up the can of executive privilege whether or not he's allowed to rely out information from lawyers and advisors. We know that the president is not covered by the Hatch Act any president, and so this whole issue, well, was it a campaign or were you the president? That may not be a hurdle as we go forward, and so I do think you're going to hear a lot about Look, I was doing what my lawyers and advisers told me to do. I had taken advice from a number of different councils, some of them had different opinions. I had to make a choice. I felt like we had legitimate move forward on the alternate electric scheme as told to me by mister Chesbro. He cited to me the issue in the circumstances in the Hawaii case from the nineteen sixties or whatever it was. And so this is what you're going to hear and ultimate fly. I think many of the decisions and the ultimate outcome of this case is going to rest not on allegations made in a trial court, but ultimately what an appellate court and like the United States Supreme Court besides, is appropriate evidence and an appropriate charge. When we're talking about former president of the United States being charged in for conduct occurring while in fact he was president of the United States. And so whether or not the appellate courts look at that and say, well, he does have some privilege or some immunity, I think that that's still an open question. Yeah, a question that may be answered first in the DC federal case. Thanks so much, Michael. That's Michael Moore, the former US attorney for the Middle District of Georgia. Welcome back to real estate investing. Made simple grant cardone here in the Cardones On every Monday, I said, Steve, would I pay you last month? Steve was paid thirty one twenty dollars last month because he invested at Cardoncapital dot Com, Cardoncapital dot Com, Cardoncapital dot Com. The Supreme Court declined to hear a case involving a lawsuit against real estate management company Cardone Capital and its CEO for making misleading statements in YouTube and Instagram videos. The lawsuit was dismissed on other grounds, but the core issue remains. Does hyping investment projects or touting crypto tookens on social media make someone a seller who can be sued under federal law by investors who are defrauded or who bought an unregistered security. To put it another way, what happens when a ninety year old securities law meets social media. Joining me is Ann a business law professor at tu Lane University. So, and let's start with the basics. The very basics tell us about the securities laws and where this definition of seller becomes important. Okay, So Section twelve is from the nineteen thirty three Securities Act and it basically has two separate provisions. The first is that a purchaser of a security that was sold unregistered when it should have been registered has a right to sue the seller. Basically, it's a right of recision. They can give the security back and ask for their money back minus any income they've earned on it. So they can sue whoever sold it to them if it was sold in violation of the registration provisions. And then secondly, they can sue anyone who sold it to them or who solicited the purchase if the prospectus or sales documents contained false statements. Now, sometimes there's a bit of a debate about what counts as a perspectus, but what it comes down to is that this is sometimes a more attractive option than say, more traditional ways of suing for false statements like Section ten B, which is the anti fraud statute, because if you sue for false statements in connection with essentially these unregistered security sales under section twelve, you don't have to show that you relied on the false statement, and you don't have to show that there was any intent to make a false statement. And so how did the Supreme Court define a seller in nineteen eighty eight, So in the case of Pitter versus Doll, there was a question of who counts as a statutory seller. In other words, Section twelve speaks of people who sell securities. So the question was, do you have to be actually the person who transfer the title me to you or could it be other people who are somewhat involved with the sale? And the court first said it has to be either a direct transfer of title or it has to be someone who solicited the purchase. But they drew a distinction between someone who is somehow involved and had something to do with the buyer actively going out and purchasing the security, and instead they said they have to who have actually solicited and had some kind of relationship with the buyer. They rejected a test that would be somehow like people who are just substantially participate in the sale. So that was interpreted by courts to mean that you could only be liable under section twelve if you literally transferred title it was your security and you sold it to someone else, or if you had some kind of direct contact with a relationship with the buyer so that you induced the purchase that way. So in our world of social media, where venture capital firms and others are hyping investment projects online, are courts having a difficult time determining whether they're sellers or not. Yeah. So the issue here is that after pinter versus Doll, there were a bunch of cases involving what were basically registered offerings. They were registered offerings, they were IPOs, where people sued for false statements in the IPO documents. Now there's a cause of action specifically for that false statements in a register statement under section eleven, and they would also sue under section twelve because Section twelve has liability both for unregistered offerings, which these weren't, or for false statements and a perspective, and courts rejected the Section twelve liability looking at pinter in a lot of cases where there was no direct contact with the buyer. So for example, issuing companies, it was their security, but they sold in a firm commitment underwriting, meaning the underwriters bought the securities from the issuer. The underwriters then sold to the public. The purchaser would try to sue the issuers inter Section twelve because the issuer's name is all over the perspectives, it's like their company, it's their securities being sold, and the courts would say the issuer did not have enough direct involvement with this particular sale to this buyer to justify imposing Section twelve viability. Now, you could still have other forms of liability because these were registered offerings, but you couldn't have liability under section twelve. So the court reading Pinder vicious now very narrowly to mean you have to have had some kind of contact with a relationship with the buyer. So now we fast forward to crypto, and the problem is there isn't an alternative scheme because crypto, assuming it's a security, which is a whole everything. But let's assume it is a security. If crypto is a security, it's not registered. So the liability regime that was available in those IPO cases for registered offerings is not available to these shareholders. So for these shareholders, Section twelve is sort of the main potential avenue of liability other than the anti fraud laws, which are much harder. So they're suing under section twelve because that's it, and what we've seen now is too appellate. Court said direct contact. We never said that what are you talking about, known as it's talent is a solicitation. As long as you make these public statements in advertising urging people to buy, that's a solicitation, even if there's no personal relationship. Meanwhile, there are at least a couple of other decisions that say, no, we're sticking to the old interpretations of pinter that there have to be this kind of direct relationship. And then you have courts that are sort of like saying in a case against Coinbase that Coinbase with air drops and materials about particular securities, that wasn't a solicitation. But it's not exactly clear why, you know, the court just says that's not enough. So we don't know exactly what's enough or what exactly the regime is going to be the Supreme Court decided not to take a case involving cardone Capital. Well, that was the case that was Actually it wasn't a registered offering. I believe it was under Regulation A. So Regulation A is an exemption from a full on registered offerings, but it does require some degree of filing and disclosure with the SEC. So it wasn't an unregistered offering. But because it's not registered offerings, the standard protections available in registered offerings are not available to purchasers. Instead, the only liability available would be, you know, just straight up fraud, which is again very hard to prove, or Section twelve liability. That's what's available. And so this real estate company, they use social media to advertise the officering that was filed with the SEC, they had documents with the SEC and so forth, and shareholders claimed that these advertisements were solicitations. In the Ninth Circuit agreed and repudiated. I mean, you know, some of the case law that had held there must be direct contact hadn't come out of the Ninth Circuit, So at very least it was disagreeing with the other courts that had imposed something like a direct contact requirement. But the Supreme Court denied sort. I mean, there are any number of reasons why they could have denied CIRT. But one possibility is that the social media cases are new. They're you know, looking to this old precedent that was generated under IPO situations, and you know, it may take some time to work through the court. You know, if you ask an average person, it doesn't seem like the difficult question. They're online, they're soliciting, Yeah, they're selling. What makes more difficult, Well, because the interesting thing is that the word solicit it doesn't actually appear in the statute. Nothing in the statute says imposing liability for solicitation, but the statute says is imposing liability for selling. The Supreme Court's interpretation of selling in Printer versus Doll, this case from nineteen eighty eight is the one that imposed this concept of solicitation with this very specific kind of definition. And to be honest, Printer doesn't seem to really understand how security sales works. There are parts of it display a kind of lack of understanding. For instance, there's a line in it that says you can't have liability for a seller's seller. That if you sell to somebody and that person sells to someone else, the original seller isn't going to be liable. But that's a firm commitment underwriting, and courts have been struggling with that. The sec has been struggling with that ever since Pinter versus all held it. So, you know, this concept of solicitation and exactly how we're defining it is not in the statute. It comes from the Supreme Court case launch. So now we're all trying to figure out what the Supreme Court met and how you translate a case in nineteen eighty eight to today the Ninth and the Eleventh Circuits? Are they in sync their rulings, Yeah, they seem to be following the same path that you know, at the very least, these sort of widespread social media campaigns are sufficient. But what's really unclear is like what would be like, I mean, once you take away the requirement of direct contact, which is how courts seem to be reading it before, then there's the question of well, how much urging is enough? And that was exactly what happened with coinbase, where you know, Coinbase technically it did have direct contact. It was talking to its customers and it you know, it does whatever it does to say, you know, here's an airdrop of a new security or whatever, and a court said, well, that's just not enough. So now we have all kinds of questions, like if social media is permissible, if you don't have the restriction of direct contact, then how much urging is enough to qualify solicitation? Given that in Pinter, the Supreme Court's concern was, we don't want just substantial participation to be enough. And the reason we don't was because we want people to have certainty as to when they are potentially liable or not. It's important that we have certainty direct contact. At least that's a rule. It may not be the best rule, it may not be the most functional rule, but we know what it means. We know when we see in. Now we're in this space where it's not clear what's going to be enough. Why don't these quotes sellers want to register just to be safe. So first of all, the crypto people, I'll say that these aren't securities anyway, But the whole point is that if you register them, there's a terrific amount of disclosure you have to make, and there's very strict liability if those disclosures are false That's why courts could get away for so long saying well, we won't have Section twelve liability for these IPO situations because there were alternatives. There's some very strict liability for false statements. If you register, you have to do a terrific amount of disclosure. It's very expensive and you're risking this liability. And a lot of crypto people say that the registration requirements, like the disclosure requirements that attach, are simply not suitable for crypto, Like they ask for things that don't make sense in the crypto context, like principles of an organization when it's a decentralized autonomous organization, or addresses when there is no address. So the crypto people will say that, not only is disclosure expensive and opens us up to all this liability, but the SEC hasn't updated the registration requirements to really makes sense in a crypto world. So then will it be up to the Supreme Court to clarify this so that there is clearer guidance? Very possibly. I mean, you know, there's a lot that could happen in between now and then. I mean, first of all, if all the circuits come to settle on something I mean, the Supreme Court doesn't have the kind of passion for securities cases that say I do. So if the circuits coalesce around a principle that's coherent, then the Supreme Court may not step in at all. And you know, we can all argue about it. But you know, I'm not convinced that crypto is, you know, the wave of the future. So at some point, if crypto has becomes less popular, then we may just see less of these cases. I mean, Regulation A was how this came up in the Ninth Circuit, and that will still exist because that's sort of a formal disclosure space for securities that you don't want to do full registration for. But reggae isn't really that popular to begin with, So I mean, if crypto becomes less of a thing, it may simply be that the disdute kind of settles down by itself. Well, it's been great to talk to you, Anne. I love your enthusiasm about securities law. That's Anne Lipton, a business law professor at Tulane University. This is not about Donald Trump versus Michael Cohen or Michael Cohen versus Donald Trump. This is about accountability, plain and simple, but it did seem a lot like Michael Cohen versus Donald Trump, as Trump's former lawyer and fixer took the stand against him this week in New York State's two hundred and fifty million dollars civil front case against the former president, And it also seemed like Trump saw it that way. He's a lie trying to get a better deal himself, having word and what played out during Cohen's testimony at times seemed more like a TV legal drama than a real trial. Joining me, as someone who was there for I'm going to save the show, Pat Patricia hurtadd O, Bloomberg Legal reporter, Pat, this was the first time in five years that Trump and Cohen have come face to face. What was it like in the courtroom where there were just about twenty feet from each other? They had a stair doown match. When it came time for Cohen to take the stand, Trump his whole body was pivoted with his seat turned to look at the witness box. Did the prosecution start by having Coen testify about his past crimes? He described what he played guilty to. Of course, he's backtracked from what his actual crimes were, and you know, sort of said that he didn't commit some of the frauds that they assert that he committed. But the State Attorney General's office was asking him basically to describe what he was supposed to do for Donald Trump, and he said between twenty twelve until twenty fifteen, each year, Trump would ask him to come into his office along with Allen Weisseelbergen, you know, basically asked him to quote unquote re engineered the finances and ask him, you know, how much do you think I'm worth? And then Trump would say I'm actually not worth three point seven billion, it should be eight billion, And he and Weiseelberg would have to go back and go through the numbers and reevaluate all the properties and assets to come up with a figure that Donald Trump had decided was his networth. So Donald Trump was just getting this figure, you know, out of thin air. Yees. Basically, Donald Trump wanted something, and so they would go back and he and Weislberg would put their heads together and try to value assets, be it golf courses or whatever, so that they would achieve the number that Trump named. And Alan Weiselberg, who was the former Trump Organization CFO, has already testified at the trial. Did he confirm these meetings. This is the first time we've had an insider's book about what these meetings were about. Weiselberg was very cagy when he testified. Weiselberg is a descendant. He, along with Donald Trump, was sued by the State ag so he wasn't very forthcoming and helpful. And so this is the first time we're getting descriptions of the eating happening with Trump calling them in. He said, basically, his boss called him in and told him what he wanted. Were there any surprises in the documents that Coen testified about. Well, I mean, it's just kind of shocking to see these things because then we were shown the actual statements of financial condition and the statements about Trump's net worth, and they would say, like Trump is worth eight billion dollars or something like that, and they would say, oh, by the way, we're adding the thirty percent premium to the fact that this is a golf course that has been constructed in good condition. And so basically, you know, Trump is giving credit for the brand because the building's complete and the constructions is finished. You know, that's like saying my house is worth thirty percent more because I keep the upkeep nicely outside and I have a nice little window box outside, you know. He said, I was tasked by mister Trump chewing increased the total assets based upon a number he arbitrarily selected, and my responsibility, along with Alan Weisserberg, predominantly was to reverse engineer the various different asset classes and increase those assets in order to achieve the number mister Trump had tasked us to do. That's the heart of this case. I mean, Leticia James, the New York Attorney General, asserts that Trump has inflated his assets. Where the argument was and the Trump people as law. You know, there's all these disavowals and declarations that warn the reader of these documents to say, you know, we don't really stand by these documents. They're just the number, right. And we saw this document from twenty fourteen where Trump was trying to fly that Buffalo Bill's football team and he claimed to be worth eight billion dollars, and that was a big discussion. Trump's lawyers were saying that it's no fair, you can't bring this in. No evidence, this claim of trying to buy the Buffalo Bills was ever made to anybody, and he didn't buy the Buffalo bills, So what's the harm? No foul, right, And the judge allowed it finally into evidence because the AG's office says, well, you know what, he claimed that this was his network, and these are the documents that went to Morgan Stanley, which was accepting bids. So Trump claimed he wanted to put in a billion dollar bid to buy the Buffalo Bills in twenty fourteen, and he claimed to be worth eight billion dollars and he had Deutsche Bank bankers back him with, you know, in a testing letter from Deutsche Bank saying that he was valuable and they had seen his net worth. When Michael Cohen is saying, hey, it's all the house of cards built on nothing. And was it Michael Cohen's testimony that got the AG started investigating Trump. Cohen's claims have basically triggered all sorts of investigations. He testified about seven different congressional investigation. It prompted an investigation of the hush money case. It prompted all kinds of investigation of Trump and his assets. Now we stand here, and I'm not saying that he's the only whistleblower, but he was the insider that said this is what Trump was doing, and it started everybody looking at him. And certainly this case originated from Michael Cohen's complaint. And I understand that the cross examination got nasty pretty quick. Yeah, I mean, you know, Cohen's a lawyer, and he got very offended when Alena Haba, who is Trump's lawyer, started asking him questions about that he lied to a federal judge, just like he lied to his wife on his tax return. And Cowen got very angry, and there was a lot of back and forth, you know, asked an answer. It was like a movie watching people arguing and bickering on the stand. Was like, Cohen is a lawyer, and he objected, he goes objection, so he is a witness objected through Alena's question. You don't see that other day, No you don't. And you know, at one point Alena shot back, do not on me, Copa, You're not on your podcast, you're not on CNN. Answer my question. So you can see there's a little bit of drama planes on both sides. This is Cohen, I'm objecting to your question. And at one point, probably we've all heard, you know, when the judge will say that question was asked and answered, and that's an objection, and Cohen said, asked an answered because she kept repeating about four times, did you lie to Judge Pauli, who was the federal judge he pled guilty too, And then subsequently Cohen claimed that he was forced to play guilty by his lawyers and he hadn't really committed some of the crimes that he pled guilty to originally, and this is in front of a judge. So all of this is yeah, so this is like right, this is exactly right. There's almost like two divergent trials going on at the same time. There's the trial that's being held if you had a jury, and the lawyers are being very dramatic and even the witness to you know, oh a check. And you're watching some kind of like reality TV show someone playing a lawyer, and that's being played too, as if there were a jury, and that might be more effective if there were a jury, but there isn't a jury. And obviously it seems like some of the lawyers know they have a very important client in his name is Donald Trump, so they're asking questions to please him. And then again you have the one person who is the jury of one who is judge and Gaurance who's deciding this. So that's what I said. It's like a parallel universe. There's two parallel trials, the one that's being played out Bible parties in the well as well as the one that's actually going on before the judge. And he has to keep reminding the lawyers you know, actually there's no jury here. I'm the trier of fact. So did Trump react during Cohen's testimony that you could say, Oh, he had his arms crossed and he was really he muttered something under his breast. I could not hear someone else claiming they had heard him say something about Cohen's credibility. But he was obviously very annoyed, and like I said that, he literally turned his entire chair around so that his arms crossed to glare at Cohen. And more drama to come, as Ivanka Trump has been ordered to testify. That may be as soon as next week. Thanks so much, Pat. That's Bloomberg Legal reporter Patricia Hurtado. So today we're announcing a federal lawsuit against Meta met of course, is the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, for knowingly harming the mental health of young social media users. In short, Meta intentionally designed its social media platform to be more addictive to kids and young people. Forty one states are suing Meta platforms, claiming it exploits young people for profit by building an addictive features that basically hook kids on Instagram and Facebook, harming their mental health. At a press conference by the Attorney General of Washington State, two teenagers describe their struggles trying to cope with social media side like Instagram. The worst part was these pictures and videos were never ending. The addictive algorithm and the constant flood of new content kept me glued to my phone, and before I knew it, I began to hate myself and the way I looked. This all happened before I turned thirteen. So I would go on my phone and tending to do other things, and then instinctively start opening up Instagram, opening up different social media platforms without even meaning to, and then getting stuck in the cycle of scrolling seeing other people's lives and interactions. Joining me is Matthew Shettenhelm, Bloomberg intelligence analyst so Met. The federal lawsuit says Meta did not disclose that its algorithms were designed to capitalize on young users, dopamine responses, and create an addictive cycle of engagement. So the allegation is that Meta specifically designed an algorithm to teenagers. That's exactly right. So the lawsuit takes aim at a number of features that are sort of fundamental to how Meta designed its social media platforms. Using data about the teens to send them content that keeps them scrolling and keeps them reading, sending them notifications that keep them coming back to the service as soon as they look away from it. Using the like system that entices them and draws them in and pushes them to put more content out there. And the allegation is that Meta knew that its social media service was harmful to teens, but it withheld that knowledge and misled users and proceeded to deliver its product to teens. Anyway, there's a separate lawsuit actually in this same federal court that goes to the design of the product itself and whether that violates product liability law or whether face Book was negligent in designing it. This suit's a little bit different. It's not about the design itself. It's about did Meta lie, did it mislead users? And a lot of this is based on the whistleblower who released internal documents in twenty twenty one. Yeah, I think that's the real start of this, when Francis Hoggin came out with her release of the internal documents suggesting that Facebook knew more about the risk to children than it was letting on. So this has really been playing out ever since that moment. Now Facebook disputes her allegations and says that they're overblown, and that's the sort of allegation that would be tested in this case if it gets past a motion to dismiss. Meta said, we share the Attorney General's commitment to providing teens with safe, positive experiences online and have already introduced over thirty tools to support teens and their families. Do you know what kind of tools they're talking about. I think these are features like there are settings that teens can put on the product to turn off after so many minutes on the product. I think there are a handful of features like that that they have added. If you go into the settings, you can turn off the data that is used about you for ads. I think as a practical matter, these features may not be used all that frequently. I know my teenager doesn't jump to find those features, and I suspect that's true of many other teams as well. So I think the negotiation here before this lawsuit was filed with the States likely trying to push Meta to find more features and more effective features. And I think eventually, if you saw this lawsuit settle, you might see a push for even more in that direction. Thanks Matt. That's Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matthew Shettenhelm, and that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts and at www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast slash Law, and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso, and you're listening to BloombergSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Molly talks with Andrew Hiller about his creartive life and Pitter Patty Finds Another Day. About Pitter Patty Finds Another Day Pitter Patty is a sad little cloud looking for a friend, but people are not friendly to rain clouds and keep singing to her to "come back another day." Can this little cloud find a friend? Can she make it to another day? Children's picture book; read aloud for 3 to 6 year olds. Uses open dyslexic font. About the author Andrew ahs been working, writing, and producing for public radio since 2006 ever since he discovered that DC has No Food. That commentary, his first for WAMU 88.5's Metro Connection, won Best of the Year and started his journey down the cobblestone path. Since then, he has been fortunate enough to meet and interview many incredible people from Muppets and Jedis to Nobel Prize Winners and political leaders. Andrew's website: https://andrewhiller.net/
Im Song „3. Oktober“ rappt die Hinterlandgang über die Zeit nach der Wiedervereinigung. Auch andere Rapper nehmen sich diesem Thema an: Zugezogn Maskulin, Audio88 oder Kummer berichten von Gewalt, Neo-Nazis und politischem Versagen während ihrer Jugend im Nachwende-Osten. Hier entlang geht's zu den Links unserer Werbepartner. Tour-Termine der Hinterlandgang: 19.10.2023 Köln (Em Drügge Pitter) 21.10.2023 Witten (Treff) 27.10.2023 Potsdam (Waschhaus) 04.11.2023 Zwickau (Roter Baum) 24.11.2023 Erlangen (E-Werk) 25.11.2023 Magdeburg (LIZ) >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/musik/popfilter-hinterlandgang-3-oktober
Im Song „3. Oktober“ rappt die Hinterlandgang über die Zeit nach der Wiedervereinigung. Auch andere Rapper nehmen sich diesem Thema an: Zugezogn Maskulin, Audio88 oder Kummer berichten von Gewalt, Neo-Nazis und politischem Versagen während ihrer Jugend im Nachwende-Osten. Hier entlang geht's zu den Links unserer Werbepartner. Tour-Termine der Hinterlandgang: 19.10.2023 Köln (Em Drügge Pitter) 21.10.2023 Witten (Treff) 27.10.2023 Potsdam (Waschhaus) 04.11.2023 Zwickau (Roter Baum) 24.11.2023 Erlangen (E-Werk) 25.11.2023 Magdeburg (LIZ) >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/musik/popfilter-hinterlandgang-3-oktober
Join Louise and Angela to find out what's working, and what's not, on LinkedIn in 2023 We cover AI, profiles, LinkedIn for non-profits and more. Angela Pitter is the founder and CEO of LiveWire Collaborative, a digital marketing consultancy. We collaborate with clients to build comprehensive solutions that help them find their target communities and convert them into customers. Our superpower is helping business owners understand how their digital footprint shows up for their customers and clients and where it isn't showing up so they can close the gaps and find the people who need their help most. LiveWire Collaborative offers various services, including Online Strategy Development and Implementation for mid-size businesses, Social Media Analysis, Facebook Ads, and Email Marketing. Additionally, LiveWire Collaborative specializes in social media training for corporations and organizations, both onsite and virtual. Previously featured on the TV series Chronicle, WCVB, Angela is a highly sought-after speaker who has personally trained thousands of CEOs, business owners, and consultants worldwide on her signature LinkedIn Influencer framework. She is the recipient of numerous awards and was recently recognized by the Charles River Regional Chamber of Commerce and GetKonnected as one of the Top 50 Most Influential Business People of Color. She is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP) and holds both her M.S. in Administration and B.S. in Computer Engineering from Boston University. Angela currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Charles River Regional Chamber of Commerce. Follow her on Twitter: @angelapitter and visit website www.livewirecollaborative.com
Chris interviews Don W. King about Ruth Pitter, a superb and often-overlooked poet who was friends with Lewis and many of the other Inklings. Don also shares some of his exclusive recording of Pitter reading her poetry. Definitely worth hearing! If you're enjoying The Inklings Variety Hour, we have no way of knowing it unless you email us (inklingsvarietyhour@gmail.com) or leave us a rating (and review) on iTunes. If we're a part of your life, we'd love to have you be a part of ours as well--let us know what you're enjoying, and what you'd like to see more of. I'd write more, but I have a newborn--welcome Arthur Edmund Pipkin, who has the most Inkling-y name of all my children.
Assistent des Kölner Dombaumeisters stellt die Kölner Domglocken vor. Das Domgeläut zählt zu den beeindruckendsten weltweit und ist vor allem wegen der Petersglocke, der tontiefsten freischwingenden Glocke der Welt, bekannt.
Social equity and public spaces may seem worlds apart, but that's where Jay Pitter enters. She's an award-winning placemaker who works at the crossroads of urban design. She delivered a public talk for the Ontario Heritage Trust called “The Future of Culture Is …” on how we define heritage, whose heritage is protected and how to confront the complexity of colonial heritage symbols.
Welcome to our episode featuring 8 hours of soothing rain sounds, the perfect companion for relaxation and a restful night's sleep. Rain has a unique ability to create a calming and peaceful ambiance that can help you unwind, release stress, and find inner tranquility. As you listen to the gentle pitter-patter of raindrops, let the rhythmic sound lull you into a state of deep relaxation. The melodic nature of rain can mask background noise and create a serene environment conducive to sleep. Whether you're looking to unwind after a long day or struggling with insomnia, this extended episode is designed to provide you with the ultimate relaxation experience. Allow the soothing rain sounds to wash away your worries and guide you into a peaceful slumber. Soothing rain sounds, Relaxation, Sleep, Rain ambiance, Calming sounds, Peaceful atmosphere, Inner tranquility, Unwind, Stress relief, Restful sleep, Pitter-patter of raindrops, Deep relaxation, Serene environment, Insomnia relief, Relaxation experience, Peaceful slumber, Melodic rain. Support our mission of spreading relaxation and wellness by rating and reviewing our podcast on your preferred platform. Your feedback helps us improve and enables others to discover the benefits of our soothing sounds. Enhance your listening experience by subscribing to our ad-free version, immersing yourself in uninterrupted tranquility. Clicking Here Join our community of relaxation seekers and embark on a journey of self-discovery. Subscribe, rate, and review Meditation Sounds today and unlock a world of serenity and rejuvenation. Email List Support this podcast https://www.meditationsoundspodcast.com Say goodbye to stubborn belly fat with our revolutionary product! Our formula is designed to target and dissolve unwanted fat, leaving you with a slimmer, more toned midsection. Try it now and experience the results for yourself. #dissolvebellyfat #slimandtoned http://bit.ly/3jV1Ip1 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Lukáš Pitter je designér a spoluzakladatel agentury 2FRESH. Lukáš ovšem chápe design hlavně jako řešení problémů a je velký propagátor techniky Design Thinking, díky které úspěšně řeší problémy ve firmách. Momentálně se zaměřuje na meetingy a jejich efektivitu.Jsou podle vás firemní porady zbytečné? Lukáš vám v rozhovoru s Danem Tržilem vysvětlí, jak by měla správná firemní porada vypadat i jaké chyby mnohdy společnosti dělají.Sám sebe označuje za designéra, ale dodává, že design je spíš mind-set, nežli umění.„Od Amazonu třeba víme, že na schůzce nemá být víc lidí, než sní jednu pizzu,“ říká a představuje i další triky, jak firemní meetingy zefektivnit, aby z nich měli zaměstnanci stejný pocit, jako lidé mívají po prvním rande.V rozhovoru s Lukášem Pitterem se dozvíte:Jací lidé obvykle meetingům dominují.Proč si Lukáš myslí, že z nás dělba práce udělala mrzáky.Představí techniky, které zlepší průběh vašich firemních schůzek.Na závěr také vysvětlí, jak dlouho lidé vlastně dokážou dávat pozor.
In the cloud, the raindrop brother and sister Pitter and Patter were holding hands. They jumped out together. If you like this story, subscribe to the podcast and share it with your friends to enjoy more free episodes together. We're also looking forward to your valuable reviews ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐,let us know your opinion! Contact us at babybusaudio-en@babybus.com to share your advice and suggestion.
In this episode, immerse yourself in the soothing and comforting ambiance of a thunderstorm as you drift off into a deep and restful sleep. Close your eyes and envision the gentle rumble of thunder and the pitter-patter of raindrops on your window, creating a cozy and serene atmosphere. Let the rhythmic sounds of nature lull you into a state of relaxation, helping you release the day's stresses and worries. Whether you struggle with insomnia or simply desire a peaceful night's sleep, this episode offers the perfect solution. Allow the calming sounds of the thunderstorm to create a tranquil environment, allowing you to sleep like a baby and wake up refreshed and rejuvenated. Sleep like a baby, Calming sounds, Thunderstorm, Sleep aid, Deep sleep, Relaxation, Serene atmosphere, Restful sleep, Insomnia, Cozy ambiance, Relaxing sounds, Pitter-patter of raindrops, Soothing sleep, Peaceful night's sleep, Sleep meditation, Stress relief, Tranquil environment, Rejuvenation. Support our mission of spreading relaxation and wellness by rating and reviewing our podcast on your preferred platform. Your feedback helps us improve and enables others to discover the benefits of our soothing sounds. Enhance your listening experience by subscribing to our ad-free version, immersing yourself in uninterrupted tranquility. Clicking Here Join our community of relaxation seekers and embark on a journey of self-discovery. Subscribe, rate, and review Meditation Sounds today and unlock a world of serenity and rejuvenation. Email List Support this podcast https://www.meditationsoundspodcast.com Say goodbye to stubborn belly fat with our revolutionary product! Our formula is designed to target and dissolve unwanted fat, leaving you with a slimmer, more toned midsection. Try it now and experience the results for yourself. #dissolvebellyfat #slimandtoned http://bit.ly/3jV1Ip1 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Pitter patter, little rain drops fall as we kick off this Wednesday morning. No, no! Not a washout. In fact, the sun will be back for many before we pull our sandwiches out at lunch. This is cold front #1 and there is more to come. Shel has the chilly, soggy-ish details for this mid-week pod episode!
Kelsey experiences beautiful Japan love, Robert finally upgrades, we wonder if Twitter exists while you read this.Check out our friends at threadspodcast.com & That Cartoon PodcastOur theme song is "The Grim Reaper Blows the Horn" by Firage.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Get some YMBToAP merch on ya bod!Find and friend YMBToAP on social media!Patreon | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube | Twitch | TikTok Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Want to know a secret? You can't be afraid to fail. Meet Andrea Pitter - founder and creative director of Pantora Bridal. You're going to learn how Andrea was able to take the dream she had as a kid of being a fashion designer and truly make it a reality! What started out as a hobby soon turned into a side hustle and then a full fledged business! Andrea shares the roadmap she took to carving out a space for Black-designed bridal to shine in an industry where Black bodies are underrepresented and excluded. We touch on the ups, downs and the uncertainties - and why Andrea always chose to BET ON HERSELF and her ideas. Andrea even gets real about how her business was impacted by COVID-19 and the steps she and her team took to ensure they were able to return to business. If you enjoy this episode, please make sure you share online with your community! You can find us at @dreamsindrive on Facebook, Twitter & Instagram, and use the hashtag #dreamsindrive! Enjoy! Andrea's Keys To Success: 1. Know your "Why" 2. Mentor 3. A good book FIND PANTORA BRIDAL ONLINE Web: www.andreapitter.com Instagram: http://instagram.com/andrea_pittercampbell FIND RANA ONLINE Instagram: @dreamsindrive Instagram: @rainshineluv SHOP THE DREAMS IN DRIVE STORE: www.dreamsindrive.com/shop DONATE TO/SUPPORT DREAMS IN DRIVE: www.dreamsindrive.com/donate SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER - THE KEYS: www.dreamsindrive.com/join
Die größte freischwingende Glocke der Welt läutet im Kölner Dom und ist eine Sammlung von Superlativen. Allein schon der 600kg schwere und 3.2m lange Klöppel gebietet Ehrfurcht...
Making the Cut, hosted by Heidi Klum and Tim Gunn, is a reality TV competition show that has fashion designers aiming for a million-dollar prize while they design and sew everything from outrageously creative runway outfits to gotta-have-it accessible outfits. In Episode 68 of the Brainwave Podcast, Gail interviews designer Andrea Pitter, who won Season 2 of Making the Cut. They talk about the childhood memory that sparked Andrea's design for an avant-garde denim garment; about her experiences on the show; and about her advice for aspiring designers. Andrea has Pandora Bridal stores in New York and Los Angeles and her collections of bridal wear and other fashions can be see online at https://www.pantorabridal.comThe Brainwave Podcast is produced and presented by WindWord Group Publishing and Media. Please visit our website at https://www.windwordgroup.com to sign up for our newsletter and receive regular information about upcoming guests, new releases, and special gifts for regular listeners and readers. Support the showLet's connect! Twitter at https://mobile.twitter.com/brainwavecastInstagram https://www,instagram.com/brainwave_podcastFacebook https://www.facebook/windwordgrouphttps://www.windwordgroup.com
Join as we explore the ancient lost text The Kebra Nagast and unpack the Rastafarian religion and culture with our special guest, Renee Pitter.
There's no better place to connect with businesses and donor prospects than on LinkedIn. With 800+ million members, LinkedIn is not the largest of the social networks, but with a specific business focus, it's an audience worth noticing. While LinkedIn might initially seem to be useful only for B2B marketing and sales, there are many ways nonprofits can utilize LinkedIn. LinkedIn can provide your organization with networking and marketing benefits, no matter the size. Nonprofits can find corporate sponsors, attract major donors, share knowledge and learn from others. My guest this week is Angela Pitter, a LinkedIn and digital marketing expert and the Founder and CEO of LiveWire Collaborative, a digital marketing consultancy. She's known for building comprehensive solutions that expand and strengthen customer engagements. Services at LiveWire Collaborative include: Online Strategy Development and Implementation for mid-size businesses, Social Media Training for corporations or organizations, one-on-one Executive Coaching, Social Media Analysis, as well as Facebook Ads and Email Marketing.Angela is a highly sought-after speaker who was recently featured on Chronicle's, WCVB TV social media segment, has spoken at the Massachusetts Conference for Women, CWE Women's Business Leaders Conference and Needham Business Association to name a few. Here are some of the topics we discussed: Why LinkedIn is such a powerful tool for nonprofitsWays we can level up our presence and our profilesThe difference between Company Pages, Groups, and Personal ProfilesHow nonprofits can do donor prospecting on LinkedIn without being spammyConnect with Angela:https://www.linkedin.com/in/angelapitter/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/livewirecollaborative/https://livewirecollaborative.com/ https://twitter.com/angelapitterhttps://nonprofit.linkedin.com/Do me a favor? Rate, Review, & Follow on Apple Podcasts (or your podcast player of choice) - it helps this podcast get seen by more people that would enjoy it! About Julia Campbell, the host of the Nonprofit Nation podcast:Named as a top thought leader by Forbes and BizTech Magazine, Julia Campbell (she/hers) is an author, coach, and speaker on a mission to make the digital world a better place.She wrote her book, Storytelling in the Digital Age: A Guide for Nonprofits, as a roadmap for social change agents who want to build movements using engaging digital storytelling techniques. Her second book, How to Build and Mobilize a Social Media Community for Your Nonprofit, was published in 2020 as a call-to-arms for mission-driven organizations to use the power of social media to build movements. Julia's online courses, webinars, and talks have helped hundreds of nonprofits make the shift to digital thinking and raise more money online. Julia's happy clients include Mastercard, GoFundMe, Facebook, Meals on Wheels America, the Make-A-Wish Foundation, and the Boys & Girls Clubs of America.
In this series, Morgan sits down with small business owners and WorkSmart alumni to explore how they have scaled their businesses, grown their teams, and adjusted their business models to achieve new levels of success. Andrea Pitter, Designer and Founder of Pantora Inc. joins us this week to share more about her entrepreneurial journey. Andrea is a force and inspiration in an industry that often lacks inclusivity and representation for the independent Black design entrepreneur. She launched Pantora Bridal in 2009 and opened a flagship store in Brooklyn a few years later. As she expands her brand to include additional brick and mortar stores, her commitment to representing the unrepresented in mainstream bridal is continuing to take center stage. Andrea is the most recent winner of Making the Cut, was on the cover of the Spring 2021 issue of the Knot, and has launched a ready-to-wear collection that is available in the Amazon Fashion Store. As an alum of the WorkSmart Program, Andrea is able to share the biggest lessons she's learned along the way. Listen for an honest conversation between two founders/entrepreneurs, the challenges they face in business, and advice they would give to aspiring entrepreneurs. To apply to the WorkSmart Program click here: https://worksmart.mykajabi.com/application To shop Pantora click here: https://www.amazon.com/stores/page/996F67D5-C720-4D03-99CF-3B59AB07482C To connect with Andrea Pitter click here: https://www.instagram.com/andrea_pittercampbell/?hl=en Have questions about WorkSmart? DM Morgan here: https://www.instagram.com/morgandebaun/
Michael is on the cusp of getting his PHD in immunology. He is Brian's friend from middle and high school. The two friends reconnect to discuss politics.Topics include: Working class perspectiveDoes our two-party system do more harm than good?Is it really as simple as “republicans are bad” and “democrats are good?”Comparing America to Western EuropeVoting rightsIs it fair to use the phrase “Jim Crow 2.0?”The hard reality of structural racism --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/searchingforpoliticaliden/support
On this week's episode, we sit down with bridal designer extraordinaire and founder Pantora Bridal, Andrea Pitter. During our enlightening conversation, Andrea shares details about her journey towards becoming one of the most recognizable names in Bridal (an industry that historically has not shone a light on its Black designers and creators). We also explore some of the early struggles she faced and what her plans are for the future. *Follow us:https://www.instagram.com/bluedopetv/https://www.instagram.com/Blue/https://www.instagram.com/OliviaDope/*Thank you so much for tuning into Blue Dope. As always, If you enjoy the podcast, please don't forget to rate, comment, and subscribe to the show.*Please visit us: https://bluedope.tv/
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
