Podcasts about wordsworth

1/ MR SKIP & THA GOD FAHIM. No limit.2/ NAPOLEON DA LEGEND. Mackandal.3/ RECOGNIZE ALI & TRAGEDY KHADAFI. Black code. feat. TRIFE DIESEL y DJ TRAY.4/ NICO MISERIA. Alfafar.5/ LOOPER PADAWAN. Flores rojas.6/ FEL SWEETENBERG. War of art. feat. DJ DJAZ.7/ M.DOT AND CONFIDENCE. 24 to 1.8/ CRIFATEMII & SEMPAISTILO. Vueltas y vueltas.9/ GORKA2H. Quien es quien. feat. Sin fin.10/ MEMPHIS BLEEK. You should know.11/ FASHAWN & MARC SPANO. Ashtrays and angels.12/ JUANINACKA & CICLO. Larga vida al rey.13/ LA ICE & ALES FABIANI. Treinta monedas.14/ DYNAS AND JAH FREEDOM. Read the message. feat. WORDSWORTH, FINALE Y DJ JON DOE.15/ CURCI & MIKE SUMMERS. Lift Yourself.16/ ERGO PRO. La Bestia Prod Gese Da O.17/ Res_Co & Laertes L. Liebheart - Calm and burn #2.Escuchar audio

Frances Wilson has written biographies of Dorothy Wordsworth, Thomas De Quincey, D.H. Lawrence, and, most recently, Muriel Spark. I thought Electric Spark was excellent. In my review, I wrote: “Wilson has done far more than string the facts together. She has created a strange and vivid portrait of one of the most curious of twentieth century novelists.” In this interview, we covered questions like why Thomas De Quincey is more widely read, why D.H. Lawrence's best books aren't his novels, Frances's conversion to spookiness, what she thinks about a whole range of modern biographers, literature and parasocial relationships, Elizabeth Bowen, George Meredith, and plenty about Muriel Spark.Here are two brief extracts. There is a full transcript below.Henry: De Quincey and Lawrence were the people you wrote about before Muriel Spark, and even though they seem like three very different people, but in their own way, they're all a little bit mad, aren't they?Frances: Yes, that is, I think, something that they have in common. It's something that I'm drawn to. I like writing about difficult people. I don't think I could write about anyone who wasn't difficult. I like difficult people in general. I like the fact that they pose a puzzle and they're hard to crack, and that their difficulty is laid out in their work and as a code. I like tackling really, really stubborn personalities as well. Yes, they were all a bit mad. The madness was what fuelled their journeys without doubt.Henry: This must make it very hard as a biographer. Is there always a code to be cracked, or are you sometimes dealing with someone who is slippery and protean and uncrackable?And.Henry: People listening will be able to tell that Spark is a very spooky person in several different ways. She had what I suppose we would call spiritual beliefs to do with ghosts and other sorts of things. You had a sort of conversion of your own while writing this book, didn't you?Frances: Yes, I did. [laughs] Every time I write a biography, I become very, very, very immersed in who I'm writing about. I learned this from Richard Holmes, who I see as a method biographer. He Footsteps his subjects. He becomes his subjects. I think I recognized when I first read Holmes's Coleridge, when I was a student, that this was how I also wanted to live. I wanted to live inside the minds of the people that I wrote about, because it was very preferable to live inside my own mind. Why not live inside the mind of someone really, really exciting, one with genius?What I felt with Spark wasn't so much that I was immersed by-- I wasn't immersed by her. I felt actually possessed by her. I think this is the Spark effect. I think a lot of her friends felt like this. I think that her lovers possibly felt like this. There is an extraordinary force to her character, which absolutely lives on, even though she's dead, but only recently dead. The conversion I felt, I think, was that I have always been a very enlightenment thinker, very rational, very scientific, very Freudian in my approach to-- I will acknowledge the unconscious but no more.By the time I finished with Spark, I'm pure woo-woo now.TranscriptHenry: Today, I am talking to Frances Wilson. Frances is a biographer. Her latest book, Electric Spark, is a biography of the novelist Muriel Spark, but she has also written about Dorothy Wordsworth, Thomas De Quincey, DH Lawrence and others. Frances, welcome.Frances Wilson: Thank you so much for having me on.Henry: Why don't more people read Thomas De Quincey's work?Frances: [laughs] Oh, God. We're going right into the deep end.[laughter]Frances: I think because there's too much of it. When I chose to write about Thomas De Quincey, I just followed one thread in his writing because Thomas De Quincey was an addict. One of the things he was addicted to was writing. He wrote far, far, far too much. He was a professional hack. He was a transcendental hack, if you like, because all of his writing he did while on opium, which made the sentences too long and too high and very, very hard to read.When I wrote about him, I just followed his interest in murder. He was fascinated by murder as a fine art. The title of one of his best essays is On Murder as One of the Fine Arts. I was also interested in his relationship with Wordsworth. I twinned those together, which meant cutting out about 97% of the rest of his work. I think people do read his Confessions of an English Opium-Eater. I think that's a cult text. It was the memoir, if you want to call it a memoir, that kick-started the whole pharmaceutical memoir business on drugs.It was also the first addict's memoir and the first recovery memoir, and I'd say also the first misery memoir. He's very much at the root of English literary culture. We're all De Quincey-an without knowing it, is my argument.Henry: Oh, no, I fully agree. That's what surprises me, that they don't read him more often.Frances: I know it's a shame, isn't it? Of all the Romantic Circle, he's the one who's the most exciting to read. Also, Lamb is wonderfully exciting to read as well, but Lamb's a tiny little bit more grounded than De Quincey, who was literally not grounded. He's floating in an opium haze above you.[laughter]Henry: What I liked about your book was the way you emphasized the book addiction, not just the opium addiction. It is shocking the way he piled up chests full of books and notebooks, and couldn't get into the room because there were too many books in there. He was [crosstalk].Frances: Yes. He had this in common with Muriel Spark. He was a hoarder, but in a much more chaotic way than Spark, because, as you say, he piled up rooms with papers and books until he couldn't get into the room, and so just rented another room. He was someone who had no money at all. The no money he had went on paying rent for rooms, storing what we would be giving to Oxfam, or putting in the recycling bin. Then he'd forget that he was paying rent on all these rooms filled with his mountains of paper. The man was chaos.Henry: What is D.H. Lawrence's best book?Frances: Oh, my argument about Lawrence is that we've gone very badly wrong in our reading of him, in seeing him primarily as a novelist and only secondarily as an essayist and critic and short story writer, and poet. This is because of F.R. Leavis writing that celebration of him called D.H. Lawrence: Novelist, because novels are not the best of Lawrence. I think the best of his novels is absolutely, without doubt, Sons and Lovers. I think we should put the novels in the margins and put in the centre, the poems, travel writing.Absolutely at the centre of the centre should be his studies in classic American literature. His criticism was- We still haven't come to terms with it. It was so good. We haven't heard all of Lawrence's various voices yet. When Lawrence was writing, contemporaries didn't think of Lawrence as a novelist at all. It was anyone's guess what he was going to come out with next. Sometimes it was a novel [laughs] and it was usually a rant about-- sometimes it was a prophecy. Posterity has not treated Lawrence well in any way, but I think where we've been most savage to him is in marginalizing his best writing.Henry: The short fiction is truly extraordinary.Frances: Isn't it?Henry: I always thought Lawrence was someone I didn't want to read, and then I read the short fiction, and I was just obsessed.Frances: It's because in the short fiction, he doesn't have time to go wrong. I think brevity was his perfect length. Give him too much space, and you know he's going to get on his soapbox and start ranting, start mansplaining. He was a terrible mansplainer. Mansplaining his versions of what had gone wrong in the world. It is like a drunk at the end of a too-long dinner party, and you really want to just bundle him out. Give him only a tiny bit of space, and he comes out with the perfection that is his writing.Henry: De Quincey and Lawrence were the people you wrote about before Muriel Spark, and even though they seem like three very different people, but in their own way, they're all a little bit mad, aren't they?Frances: Yes, that is, I think, something that they have in common. It's something that I'm drawn to. I like writing about difficult people. I don't think I could write about anyone who wasn't difficult. I like difficult people in general. I like the fact that they pose a puzzle and they're hard to crack, and that their difficulty is laid out in their work and as a code. I like tackling really, really stubborn personalities as well. Yes, they were all a bit mad. The madness was what fuelled their journeys without doubt.Henry: This must make it very hard as a biographer. Is there always a code to be cracked, or are you sometimes dealing with someone who is slippery and protean and uncrackable?Frances: I think that the way I approach biography is that there is a code to crack, but I'm not necessarily concerned with whether I crack it or not. I think it's just recognizing that there's a hell of a lot going on in the writing and that, in certain cases and not in every case at all, the best way of exploring the psyche of the writer and the complexity of the life is through the writing, which is a argument for psycho biography, which isn't something I necessarily would argue for, because it can be very, very crude.I think with the writers I choose, there is no option. Muriel Spark argued for this as well. She said in her own work as a biographer, which was really very, very strong. She was a biographer before she became a novelist. She thought hard about biography and absolutely in advance of anyone else who thought about biography, she said, "Of course, the only way we can approach the minds of writers is through their work, and the writer's life is encoded in the concerns of their work."When I was writing about Muriel Spark, I followed, as much as I could, to the letter, her own theories of biography, believing that that was part of the code that she left. She said very, very strong and very definitive things about what biography was about and how to write a biography. I tried to follow those rules.Henry: Can we play a little game where I say the names of some biographers and you tell me what you think of them?Frances: Oh my goodness. Okay.Henry: We're not trying to get you into trouble. We just want some quick opinions. A.N. Wilson.Frances: I think he's wonderful as a biographer. I think he's unzipped and he's enthusiastic and he's unpredictable and he's often off the rails. I think his Goethe biography-- Have you read the Goethe biography?Henry: Yes, I thought that was great.Frances: It's just great, isn't it? It's so exciting. I like the way that when he writes about someone, it's almost as if he's memorized the whole of their work.Henry: Yes.Frances: You don't imagine him sitting at a desk piled with books and having to score through his marginalia. It sits in his head, and he just pours it down on a page. I'm always excited by an A.N. Wilson biography. He is one of the few biographers who I would read regardless of who the subject was.Henry: Yes.Frances: I just want to read him.Henry: He does have good range.Frances: He absolutely does have good range.Henry: Selina Hastings.Frances: I was thinking about Selina Hastings this morning, funnily enough, because I had been talking to people over the weekend about her Sybil Bedford biography and why that hadn't lifted. She wrote a very excitingly good life of Nancy Mitford and then a very unexcitingly not good life of Sybil Bedford. I was interested in why the Sybil Bedford simply hadn't worked. I met people this weekend who were saying the same thing, that she was a very good biographer who had just failed [laughs] to give us anything about Sybil Bedford.I think what went wrong in that biography was that she just could not give us her opinions. It's as if she just withdrew from her subject as if she was writing a Wikipedia entry. There were no opinions at all. What the friends I was talking to said was that she just fell out with her subject during the book. That's what happened. She stopped being interested in her. She fell out with her and therefore couldn't be bothered. That's what went wrong.Henry: Interesting. I think her Evelyn Waugh biography is superb.Frances: Yes, I absolutely agree. She was on fire until this last one.Henry: That's one of the best books on Waugh, I think.Frances: Yes.Henry: Absolutely magical.Frances: I also remember, it's a very rare thing, of reading a review of it by Hilary Mantel saying that she had not read a biography that had been as good, ever, as Selina Hastings' on Evelyn Waugh. My goodness, that's high praise, isn't it?Henry: Yes, it is. It is. I'm always trying to push that book on people. Richard Holmes.Frances: He's my favourite. He's the reason that I'm a biographer at all. I think his Coleridge, especially the first volume of the two-volume Coleridge, is one of the great books. It left me breathless when I read it. It was devastating. I also think that his Johnson and Savage book is one of the great books. I love Footsteps as well, his account of the books he didn't write in Footsteps. I think he has a strange magic. When Muriel Spark talked about certain writers and critics having a sixth literary sense, which meant that they tuned into language and thought in a way that the rest of us don't, I think that Richard Holmes does have that. I think he absolutely has it in relation to Coleridge. I'm longing for his Tennyson to come out.Henry: Oh, I know. I know.Frances: Oh, I just can't wait. I'm holding off on reading Tennyson until I've got Holmes to help me read him. Yes, he is quite extraordinary.Henry: I would have given my finger to write the Johnson and Savage book.Frances: Yes, I know. I agree. How often do you return to it?Henry: Oh, all the time. All the time.Frances: Me too.Henry: Michael Holroyd.Frances: Oh, that's interesting, Michael Holroyd, because I think he's one of the great unreads. I think he's in this strange position of being known as a greatest living biographer, but nobody's read him on Augustus John. [laughs] I haven't read his biographies cover to cover because they're too long and it's not in my subject area, but I do look in them, and they're novelistic in their wit and complexity. His sentences are very, very, very entertaining, and there's a lot of freight in each paragraph. I hope that he keeps selling.I love his essays as well, and also, I think that he has been a wonderful ambassador for biography. He's very, very supportive of younger biographers, which not every biographer is, but I know he's been very supportive of younger biographers and is incredibly approachable.Henry: Let's do a few Muriel Spark questions. Why was the Book of Job so important to Muriel Spark?Frances: I think she liked it because it was rogue, because it was the only book of the Bible that wasn't based on any evidence, it wasn't based on any truth. It was a fictional book, and she liked fiction sitting in the middle of fact. That was one of her main things, as all Spark lovers know. She liked the fact that there was this work of pure imagination and extraordinarily powerful imagination sitting in the middle of the Old Testament, and also, she thought it was an absolutely magnificent poem.She saw herself primarily as a poet, and she responded to it as a poem, which, of course, it is. Also, she liked God in it. She described Him as the Incredible Hulk [laughs] and she liked His boastfulness. She enjoyed, as I do, difficult personalities, and she liked the fact that God had such an incredibly difficult personality. She liked the fact that God boasted and boasted and boasted, "I made this and I made that," to Job, but also I think she liked the fact that you hear God's voice.She was much more interested in voices than she was in faces. The fact that God's voice comes out of the burning bush, I think it was an image for her of early radio, this voice speaking, and she liked the fact that what the voice said was tricksy and touchy and impossibly arrogant. He gives Moses all these instructions to lead the Israelites, and Moses says, "But who shall I say sent me? Who are you?" He says, "I am who I am." [laughs] She thought that was completely wonderful. She quotes that all the time about herself. She says, "I know it's a bit large quoting God, but I am who I am." [laughs]Henry: That disembodied voice is very important to her fiction.Frances: Yes.Henry: It's the telephone in Memento Mori.Frances: Yes.Henry: Also, to some extent, tell me what you think of this, the narrator often acts like that.Frances: Like this disembodied voice?Henry: Yes, like you're supposed to feel like you're not quite sure who's telling you this or where you're being told it from. That's why it gets, like in The Ballad of Peckham Rye or something, very weird.Frances: Yes. I'm waiting for the PhD on Muriel Sparks' narrators. Maybe it's being done as we speak, but she's very, very interested in narrators and the difference between first-person and third-person. She was very keen on not having warm narrators, to put it mildly. She makes a strong argument throughout her work for the absence of the seductive narrative. Her narratives are, as we know, unbelievably seductive, but not because we are being flattered as readers and not because the narrator makes herself or himself pretty. The narrator says what they feel like saying, withholds most of what you would like them to say, plays with us, like in a Spark expression, describing her ideal narrator like a cat with a bird [laughs].Henry: I like that. Could she have been a novelist if she had not become a Catholic?Frances: No, she couldn't. The two things happened at the same time. I wonder, actually, whether she became a Catholic in order to become a novelist. It wasn't that becoming a novelist was an accidental effect of being a Catholic. The conversion was, I think, from being a biographer to a novelist rather than from being an Anglican to a Catholic. What happened is a tremendous interest. I think it's the most interesting moment in any life that I've ever written about is the moment of Sparks' conversion because it did break her life in two.She converted when she was in her mid-30s, and several things happened at once. She converted to Catholicism, she became a Catholic, she became a novelist, but she also had this breakdown. The breakdown was very much part of that conversion package. The breakdown was brought on, she says, by taking Dexys. There was slimming pills, amphetamines. She wanted to lose weight. She put on weight very easily, and her weight went up and down throughout her life.She wanted to take these diet pills, but I think she was also taking the pills because she needed to do all-nighters, because she never, ever, ever stopped working. She was addicted to writing, but also she was impoverished and she had to sell her work, and she worked all night. She was in a rush to get her writing done because she'd wasted so much of her life in her early 20s, in a bad marriage trapped in Africa. She needed to buy herself time. She was on these pills, which have terrible side effects, one of which is hallucinations.I think there were other reasons for her breakdown as well. She was very, very sensitive and I think psychologically fragile. Her mother lived in a state of mental fragility, too. She had a crash when she finished her book. She became depressed. Of course, a breakdown isn't the same as depression, but what happened to her in her breakdown was a paranoid attack rather than a breakdown. She didn't crack into nothing and then have to rebuild herself. She just became very paranoid. That paranoia was always there.Again, it's what's exciting about her writing. She was drawn to paranoia in other writers. She liked Cardinal Newman's paranoia. She liked Charlotte Brontë's paranoia, and she had paranoia. During her paranoid attack, she felt very, very interestingly, because nothing that happened in her life was not interesting, that T.S. Eliot was sending her coded messages. He was encoding these messages in his play, The Confidential Clerk, in the program notes to the play, but also in the blurbs he wrote for Faber and Faber, where he was an editor. These messages were very malign and they were encoded in anagrams.The word lived, for example, became devil. I wonder whether one of the things that happened during her breakdown wasn't that she discovered God, but that she met the devil. I don't think that that's unusual as a conversion experience. In fact, the only conversion experience she ever describes, you'll remember, is in The Girls of Slender Means, when she's describing Nicholas Farrington's conversion. That's the only conversion experience she ever describes. She says that his conversion is when he sees one of the girls leaving the burning building, holding a Schiaparelli dress. Suddenly, he's converted because he's seen a vision of evil.She says, "Conversion can be as a result of a recognition of evil, rather than a recognition of good." I think that what might have happened in this big cocktail of things that happened to her during her breakdown/conversion, is that a writer whom she had idolized, T.S. Eliot, who taught her everything that she needed to know about the impersonality of art. Her narrative coldness comes from Eliot, who thought that emotions had no place in art because they were messy, and art should be clean.I think a writer whom she had idolized, she suddenly felt was her enemy because she was converting from his church, because he was an Anglo-Catholic. He was a high Anglican, and she was leaving Anglo-Catholicism to go through the Rubicon, to cross the Rubicon into Catholicism. She felt very strongly that that is something he would not have approved of.Henry: She's also leaving poetry to become a prose writer.Frances: She was leaving his world of poetry. That's absolutely right.Henry: This is a very curious parallel because the same thing exactly happens to De Quincey with his worship of Wordsworth.Frances: You're right.Henry: They have the same obsessive mania. Then this, as you say, not quite a breakdown, but a kind of explosive mania in the break. De Quincey goes out and destroys that mossy hut or whatever it is in the orchard, doesn't he?Frances: Yes, that disgusting hut in the orchard. Yes, you're completely right. What fascinated me about De Quincey, and this was at the heart of the De Quincey book, was how he had been guided his whole life by Wordsworth. He discovered Wordsworth as a boy when he read We Are Seven, that very creepy poem about a little girl sitting on her sibling's grave, describing the sibling as still alive. For De Quincey, who had lost his very adored sister, he felt that Wordsworth had seen into his soul and that Wordsworth was his mentor and his lodestar.He worshipped Wordsworth as someone who understood him and stalked Wordsworth, pursued and stalked him. When he met him, what he discovered was a man without any redeeming qualities at all. He thought he was a dry monster, but it didn't stop him loving the work. In fact, he loved the work more and more. What threw De Quincey completely was that there was such a difference between Wordsworth, the man who had no genius, and Wordsworth, the poet who had nothing but.Eliot described it, the difference between the man who suffers and the mind which creates. What De Quincey was trying to deal with was the fact that he adulated the work, but was absolutely appalled by the man. Yes, you're right, this same experience happened to spark when she began to feel that T.S. Eliot, whom she had never met, was a malign person, but the work was still not only of immense importance to her, but the work had formed her.Henry: You see the Wasteland all over her own work and the shared Dante obsession.Frances: Yes.Henry: It's remarkably strong. She got to the point of thinking that T.S. Eliot was breaking into her house.Frances: Yes. As I said, she had this paranoid imagination, but also what fired her imagination and what repeated itself again and again in the imaginative scenarios that recur in her fiction and nonfiction is the idea of the intruder. It was the image of someone rifling around in cupboards, drawers, looking at manuscripts. This image, you first find it in a piece she wrote about finding herself completely coincidentally, staying the night during the war in the poet Louis MacNeice's house. She didn't know it was Louis MacNeice's house, but he was a poet who was very, very important to her.Spark's coming back from visiting her parents in Edinburgh in 1944. She gets talking to an au pair on the train. By the time they pull into Houston, there's an air raid, and the au pair says, "Come and spend the night at mine. My employers are away and they live nearby in St. John's Wood." Spark goes to this house and sees it's packed with books and papers, and she's fascinated by the quality of the material she finds there.She looks in all the books. She goes into the attic, and she looks at all the papers, and she asks the au pair whose house it is, and the au pair said, "Oh, he's a professor called Professor Louis MacNeice." Spark had just been reading Whitney. He's one of her favourite poets. She retells this story four times in four different forms, as non-fiction, as fiction, as a broadcast, as reflections, but the image that keeps coming back, what she can't get rid of, is the idea of herself as snooping around in this poet's study.She describes herself, in one of the versions, as trying to draw from his papers his power as a writer. She says she sniffs his pens, she puts her hands over his papers, telling herself, "I must become a writer. I must become a writer." Then she makes this weird anonymous phone call. She loved the phone because it was the most strange form of electrical device. She makes a weird anonymous phone call to an agent, saying, "I'm ringing from Louis MacNeice's house, would you like to see my manuscript?" She doesn't give her name, and the agent says yes.Now I don't believe this phone call took place. I think it's part of Sparks' imagination. This idea of someone snooping around in someone else's room was very, very powerful to her. Then she transposed it in her paranoid attack about T.S. Eliot. She transposed the image that Eliot was now in her house, but not going through her papers, but going through her food cupboards. [laughs] In her food cupboards, all she actually had was baked beans because she was a terrible cook. Part of her unwellness at that point was malnutrition. No, she thought that T.S. Eliot was spying on her. She was obsessed with spies. Spies, snoopers, blackmailers.Henry: T.S. Eliot is Stealing My Baked Beans would have been a very good title for a memoir.Frances: It actually would, wouldn't it?Henry: Yes, it'd be great.[laughter]Henry: People listening will be able to tell that Spark is a very spooky person in several different ways. She had what I suppose we would call spiritual beliefs to do with ghosts and other sorts of things. You had a sort of conversion of your own while writing this book, didn't you?Frances: Yes, I did. [laughs] Every time I write a biography, I become very, very, very immersed in who I'm writing about. I learned this from Richard Holmes, who I see as a method biographer. He Footsteps his subjects. He becomes his subjects. I think I recognized when I first read Holmes's Coleridge, when I was a student, that this was how I also wanted to live. I wanted to live inside the minds of the people that I wrote about, because it was very preferable to live inside my own mind. Why not live inside the mind of someone really, really exciting, one with genius?What I felt with Spark wasn't so much that I was immersed by-- I wasn't immersed by her. I felt actually possessed by her. I think this is the Spark effect. I think a lot of her friends felt like this. I think that her lovers possibly felt like this. There is an extraordinary force to her character, which absolutely lives on, even though she's dead, but only recently dead. The conversion I felt, I think, was that I have always been a very enlightenment thinker, very rational, very scientific, very Freudian in my approach to-- I will acknowledge the unconscious but no more.By the time I finished with Spark, I'm pure woo-woo now. Anything can happen. This is one of the reasons Spark was attracted to Catholicism because anything can happen, because it legitimizes the supernatural. I felt so strongly that the supernatural experiences that Spark had were real, that what Spark was describing as the spookiness of our own life were things that actually happened.One of the things I found very, very unsettling about her was that everything that happened to her, she had written about first. She didn't describe her experiences in retrospect. She described them as in foresight. For example, her first single authored published book, because she wrote for a while in collaboration with her lover, Derek Stanford, but her first single authored book was a biography of Mary Shelley.Henry: Great book.Frances: An absolutely wonderful book, which really should be better than any of the other Mary Shelley biographies. She completely got to Mary Shelley. Everything she described in Mary Shelley's life would then happen to Spark. For example, she described Mary Shelley as having her love letters sold. Her lover sold Mary Shelley's love letters, and Mary Shelley was then blackmailed by the person who bought them. This happened to Spark. She described Mary Shelley's closest friends all becoming incredibly jealous of her literary talent. This happened to Spark. She described trusting people who betrayed her. This happened to Spark.Spark was the first person to write about Frankenstein seriously, to treat Frankenstein as a masterpiece rather than as a one-off weird novel that is actually just the screenplay for a Hammer Horror film. This was 1951, remember. Everything she described in Frankenstein as its power is a hybrid text, described the powerful hybrid text that she would later write about. What fascinated her in Frankenstein was the relationship between the creator and the monster, and which one was the monster. This is exactly the story of her own life. I think where she is. She was really interested in art monsters and in the fact that the only powerful writers out there, the only writers who make a dent, are monsters.If you're not a monster, you're just not competing. I think Spark has always spoken about as having a monster-like quality. She says at the end of one of her short stories, Bang-bang You're Dead, "Am I an intellectual woman, or am I a monster?" It's the question that is frequently asked of Spark. I think she worked so hard to monsterize herself. Again, she learnt this from Elliot. She learnt her coldness from Elliot. She learnt indifference from Elliot. There's a very good letter where she's writing to a friend, Shirley Hazzard, in New York.It's after she discovers that her lover, Derek Stanford, has sold her love letters, 70 love letters, which describe two very, very painfully raw, very tender love letters. She describes to Shirley Hazzard this terrible betrayal. She says, "But, I'm over it. I'm over it now. Now I'm just going to be indifferent." She's telling herself to just be indifferent about this. You watch her tutoring herself into the indifference that she needed in order to become the artist that she knew she was.Henry: Is this why she's attracted to mediocrities, because she can possess them and monsterize them, and they're good feeding for her artistic programme?Frances: Her attraction to mediocrities is completely baffling, and it makes writing her biography, a comedy, because the men she was surrounded by were so speck-like. Saw themselves as so important, but were, in fact, so speck-like that you have to laugh, and it was one after another after another. I'd never come across, in my life, so many men I'd never heard of. This was the literary world that she was surrounded by. It's odd, I don't know whether, at the time, she knew how mediocre these mediocrities were.She certainly recognised it in her novels where they're all put together into one corporate personality called the pisseur de copie in A Far Cry from Kensington, where every single literary mediocrity is in that critic who she describes as pissing and vomiting out copy. With Derek Stanford, who was obviously no one's ever heard of now, because he wrote nothing that was memorable, he was her partner from the end of the 40s until-- They ceased their sexual relationship when she started to be interested in becoming a Catholic in 1953, but she was devoted to him up until 1958. She seemed to be completely incapable of recognising that she had the genius and he had none.Her letters to him deferred to him, all the time, as having literary powers that she hadn't got, as having insights that she hadn't got, he's better read than she was. She was such an amazingly good critic. Why could she not see when she looked at his baggy, bad prose that it wasn't good enough? She rated him so highly. When she was co-authoring books with him, which was how she started her literary career, they would occasionally write alternative sentences. Some of her sentences are always absolutely-- they're sharp, lean, sparkling, and witty, and his are way too long and really baggy and they don't say anything. Obviously, you can see that she's irritated by it.She still doesn't say, "Look, I'm going now." It was only when she became a novelist that she said, "I want my mind to myself." She puts, "I want my mind to myself." She didn't want to be in a double act with him. Doubles were important to her. She didn't want to be in a double act with him anymore. He obviously had bought into her adulation of him and hadn't recognised that she had this terrifying power as a writer. It was now his turn to have the breakdown. Spark had the mental breakdown in 1950, '45. When her first novel came out in 1957, it was Stanford who had the breakdown because he couldn't take on board who she was as a novelist.What he didn't know about her as a novelist was her comic sense, how that would fuel the fiction, but also, he didn't recognize because he reviewed her books badly. He didn't recognise that the woman who had been so tender, vulnerable, and loving with him could be this novelist who had nothing to say about tenderness or love. In his reviews, he says, "Why are her characters so cold?" because he thought that she should be writing from the core of her as a human being rather than the core of her as an intellect.Henry: What are her best novels?Frances: Every one I read, I think this has to be the best.[laughter]This is particularly the case in the early novels, where I'm dazzled by The Comforters and think there cannot have been a better first novel of the 20th century or even the 21st century so far. The Comforters. Then read Robinson, her second novel, and think, "Oh God, no, that is her best novel. Then Memento Mori, I think, "Actually, that must be the best novel of the 20th century." [laughs] Then you move on to The Ballad of Peckham Rye, I think, "No, that's even better."The novels landed. It's one of the strange things about her; it took her so long to become a novelist. When she had become one, the novels just landed. Once in one year, two novels landed. In 1959, she had, it was The Bachelors and The Ballad of Peckham Rye, both just completely extraordinary. The novels had been the storing up, and then they just fell on the page. They're different, but samey. They're samey in as much as they're very, very, very clever. They're clever about Catholicism, and they have the same narrative wit. My God, do the plots work in different ways. She was wonderful at plots. She was a great plotter. She liked plots in both senses of the world.She liked the idea of plotting against someone, also laying a plot. She was, at the same time, absolutely horrified by being caught inside someone's plot. That's what The Comforters is about, a young writer called Caroline Rose, who has a breakdown, it's a dramatisation of Sparks' own breakdown, who has a breakdown, and believes that she is caught inside someone else's story. She is a typewriter repeating all of her thoughts. Typewriter and a chorus repeating all of her thoughts.What people say about The Comforters is that Caroline Rose thought she is a heroine of a novel who finds herself trapped in a novel. Actually, if you read what Caroline Rose says in the novel, she doesn't think she's trapped in a novel; she thinks she's trapped in a biography. "There is a typewriter typing the story of our lives," she says to her boyfriend. "Of our lives." Muriel Sparks' first book was about being trapped in a biography, which is, of course, what she brought on herself when she decided to trap herself in a biography. [laughs]Henry: I think I would vote for Loitering with Intent, The Girls of Slender Means as my favourites. I can see that Memento Mori is a good book, but I don't love it, actually.Frances: Really? Interesting. Okay. I completely agree with you about-- I think Loitering with Intent is my overall favourite. Don't you find every time you read it, it's a different book? There are about 12 books I've discovered so far in that book. She loved books inside books, but every time I read it, I think, "Oh my God, it's changed shape again. It's a shape-shifting novel."Henry: We all now need the Frances Wilson essay about the 12 books inside Loitering with Intent.Frances: I know.[laughter]Henry: A few more general questions to close. Did Thomas De Quincey waste his talents?Frances: I wouldn't have said so. I think that's because every single day of his life, he was on opium.Henry: I think the argument is a combination of too much opium and also too much magazine work and not enough "real serious" philosophy, big poems, whatever.Frances: I think the best of his work went into Blackwood's, so the magazine work. When he was taken on by Blackwood's, the razor-sharp Edinburgh magazine, then the best of his work took place. I think that had he only written the murder essays, that would have been enough for me, On Murder as a Fine Art.That was enough. I don't need any more of De Quincey. I think Confessions of an English Opium-Eater is also enough in as much as it's the great memoir of addiction. We don't need any more memoirs of addiction, just read that. It's not just a memoir of being addicted to opium. It's about being addicted to what's what. It's about being a super fan and addicted to writing. He was addicted to everything. If he was in AA now, they'd say, apparently, there are 12 addictions, he had all of them. [laughs]Henry: Yes. People talk a lot about parasocial relationships online, where you read someone online or you follow them, and you have this strange idea in your head that you know them in some way, even though they're just this disembodied online person. You sometimes see people say, "Oh, we should understand this more." I think, "Well, read the history of literature, parasocial relationships everywhere."Frances: That's completely true. I hadn't heard that term before. The history of literature, a parasocial relationship. That's your next book.Henry: There we go. I think what I want from De Quincey is more about Shakespeare, because I think the Macbeth essay is superb.Frances: Absolutely brilliant. On Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth.Henry: Yes, and then you think, "Wait, where's the rest of this book? There should be an essay about every play."Frances: That's an absolutely brilliant example of microhistory, isn't it? Just taking a moment in a play, just the knocking at the gate, the morning after the murders, and blowing that moment up, so it becomes the whole play. Oh, my God, it's good. You're right.Henry: It's so good. What is, I think, "important about it", is that in the 20th century, critics started saying or scholars started saying a lot, "We can't just look at the words on the page. We've got to think about the dramaturgy. We've got to really, really think about how it plays out." De Quincey was an absolute master of that. It's really brilliant.Frances: Yes.Henry: What's your favourite modern novel or novelist?Frances: Oh, Hilary Mantel, without doubt, I think. I think we were lucky enough to live alongside a great, great, great novelist. I think the Wolf Hall trilogy is absolutely the greatest piece of narrative fiction that's come out of the 21st century. I also love her. I love her work as an essayist. I love her. She's spooky like Spark. She was inspired.Henry: Yes, she is. Yes.Frances: She learnt a lot of her cunning from Spark, I think. She's written a very spooky memoir. In fact, the only women novelists who acknowledge Spark as their influencer are Ali Smith and Hilary Mantel, although you can see Spark in William Boyd all the time. I think we're pretty lucky to live alongside William Boyd as well. Looking for real, real greatness, I think there's no one to compare with Mantel. Do you agree?Henry: I don't like the third volume of the trilogy.Frances: Okay. Right.Henry: Yes, in general, I do agree. Yes. I think some people don't like historical fiction for a variety of reasons. It may take some time for her to get it. I think she's acknowledged as being really good. I don't know that she's yet acknowledged at the level that you're saying.Frances: Yes.Henry: I think that will take a little bit longer. Maybe as and when there's a biography that will help with that, which I'm sure there will be a biography.Frances: I think they need to wait. I do think it's important to wait for a reputation to settle before starting the biography. Her biography will be very interesting because she married the same man twice. Her growth as a novelist was so extraordinary. Spark, she spent time in Africa. She had this terrible, terrible illness. She knew something. I think what I love about Mantel is, as with Spark, she knew something. She knew something, and she didn't quite know what it was that she knew. She had to write because of this knowledge. When you read her, you know that she's on a different level of understanding.Henry: You specialise in slightly neglected figures of English literature. Who else among the canonical writers deserves a bit more attention?Frances: Oh, that's interesting. I love minor characters. I think Spark was very witty about describing herself as a minor novelist or a writer of minor novels when she was evidently major. She always saw the comedy in being a minor. All the minor writers interest me. Elizabeth Bowen, Henry Green. No, they have heard Elizabeth Bowen has been treated well by Hermione Lee and Henry Green has been treated well by Jeremy Treglown.Why are they not up there yet? They're so much better than most of their contemporaries. I am mystified and fascinated by why it is that the most powerful writers tend to be kicked into the long grass. It's dazzling. When you read a Henry Green novel, you think, "But this is what it's all about. He's understood everything about what the novel can do. Why has no one heard of him?"Henry: I think Elizabeth Bowen's problem is that she's so concise, dense, and well-structured, and everything really plays its part in the pattern of the whole that it's not breezy reading.Frances: No, it's absolutely not.Henry: I think that probably holds her back in some way, even though when I have pushed it on people, most of the time they've said, "Gosh, she's a genius."Frances: Yes.Henry: It's not an easy genius. Whereas Dickens, the pages sort of fly along, something like that.Frances: Yes. One of the really interesting things about Spark is that she really, really is easy reading. At the same time, there's so much freight in those books. There's so much intellectual weight and so many games being played. There's so many books inside the books. Yet you can just read them for the pleasure. You can just read them for the plot. You can read one in an afternoon and think that you've been lost inside a book for 10 years. You don't get that from Elizabeth Bowen. That's true. The novels, you feel the weight, don't you?Henry: Yes.Frances: She's Jamesian. She's more Jamesian, I think, than Spark is.Henry: Something like A World of Love, it requires quite a lot of you.Frances: Yes, it does. Yes, it's not bedtime reading.Henry: No, exactly.Frances: Sitting up in a library.Henry: Yes. Now, you mentioned James. You're a Henry James expert.Frances: I did my PhD on Henry James.Henry: Yes. Will you ever write about him?Frances: I have, actually. Just a little plug. I've just done a selection of James's short stories, three volumes, which are coming out, I think, later this year for Riverrun with a separate introduction for each volume. I think that's all the writing I'm going to do on James. When I was an academic, I did some academic essays on him for collections and things. No, I've never felt, ever, ready to write on James because he's too complicated. I can only take tiny, tiny bits of James and home in on them.Henry: He's a great one for trying to crack the code.Frances: He really is. In fact, I was struck all the way through writing Electric Spark by James's understanding of the comedy of biography, which is described in the figure in the carpet. Remember that wonderful story where there's a writer called Verica who explains to a young critic that none of the critics have understood what his work's about. Everything that's written about him, it's fine, but it's absolutely missed his main point, his beautiful point. He said that in order to understand what the work's about, you have to look for The Figure in the Carpet. It's The Figure in the CarpetIt's the string on which my pearls are strung. A couple of critics become completely obsessed with looking for this Figure in the Carpet. Of course, Spark loved James's short stories. You feel James's short stories playing inside her own short stories. I think that one of the games she left for her biographers was the idea of The Figure in the Carpet. Go on, find it then. Find it. [laughs] The string on which my pearls are strung.Henry: Why did you leave academia? We should say that you did this before it became the thing that everyone's doing.Frances: Is everyone leaving now?Henry: A lot of people are leaving now.Frances: Oh, I didn't know. I was ahead of the curve. I left 20 years ago because I wasn't able to write the books I wanted to write. I left when I'd written two books as an academic. My first was Literary Seductions, and my second was a biography of a blackmailing courtesan called Harriet Wilson, and the book was called The Courtesan's Revenge. My department was sniffy about the books because they were published by Faber and not by OUP, and suggested that somehow I was lowering the tone of the department.This is what things were like 20 years ago. Then I got a contract to write The Ballad of Dorothy Wordsworth, my third book, again with Faber. I didn't want to write the book with my head of department in the back of my mind saying, "Make this into an academic tome and put footnotes in." I decided then that I would leave, and I left very suddenly. Now, I said I'm leaving sort of now, and I've got books to write, and felt completely liberated. Then for The Ballad of Dorothy Wordsworth, I decided not to have footnotes. It's the only book I've ever written without footnotes, simply as a celebration of no longer being in academia.Then the things I loved about being in academia, I loved teaching, and I loved being immersed in literature, but I really couldn't be around colleagues and couldn't be around the ridiculous rules of what was seen as okay. In fact, the university I left, then asked me to come back on a 0.5 basis when they realised that it was now fashionable to have someone who was a trade author. They asked me to come back, which I did not want to do. I wanted to spend days where I didn't see people rather than days where I had to talk to colleagues all the time. I think that academia is very unhappy. The department I was in was incredibly unhappy.Since then, I took up a job very briefly in another English department where I taught creative writing part-time. That was also incredibly unhappy. I don't know whether other French departments or engineering departments are happier places than English departments, but English departments are the most unhappy places I think I've ever seen.[laughter]Henry: What do you admire about the work of George Meredith?Frances: Oh, I love George Meredith. [laughs] Yes. I think Modern Love, his first novel, Modern Love, in a strange sonnet form, where it's not 14 lines, but 16 lines. By the time you get to the bottom two lines, the novel, the sonnet has become hysterical. Modern Love hasn't been properly recognised. It's an account of the breakdown of his marriage. His wife, who was the daughter of the romantic, minor novelist, Thomas Love Peacock. His wife had an affair with the artist who painted the famous Death of Chatterton. Meredith was the model for Chatterton, the dead poet in his purple silks, with his hand falling on the ground. There's a lot of mythology around Meredith.I think, as with Elizabeth Bowen and Henry Green, he's difficult. He's difficult. The other week, I tried to reread Diana of the Crossways, which was a really important novel, and I still love it. I really recognise that it's not an easy read. He doesn't try, in any way, to seduce his readers. They absolutely have to crawl inside each book to sit inside his mind and see the world as he's seeing it.Henry: Can you tell us what you will do next?Frances: At the moment, I'm testing some ideas out. I feel, at the end of every biography, you need a writer. You need to cleanse your palate. Otherwise, there's a danger of writing the same book again. I need this time, I think, to write about, to move century and move genders. I want to go back, I think, to the 19th century. I want to write about a male writer for a moment, and possibly not a novelist as well, because after being immersed in Muriel Sparks' novels, no other novel is going to seem good enough. I'm testing 19th-century men who didn't write novels, and it will probably be a minor character.Henry: Whatever it is, I look forward to reading it. Frances Wilson, thank you very much.Frances: Thank you so much, Henry. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.commonreader.co.uk/subscribe

My friend Simon Curtis, who has died aged 70, was one of the small band of people who work tirelessly, for no pay and few thanks, to promote poetry. An excellent poet himself, he edited two magazines and helped many struggling writers into print.His heroes were Wordsworth, Hardy and Causley. His own poetry, which rhymed and was perfectly accessible, was distinguished by, in his words, its "shrewd, ironic and Horatian tone". It ranged from accomplished light verse, which was often very funny, to deeply affecting poems about family bereavement. He appeared in the Faber Poetry Introduction 6 (1985).Simon was born in Burnley, Lancashire, the son of Susan, an English teacher, and the Rev Douglas Curtis, a vicar, and grew up in Northamptonshire. Armed with an English degree from Cambridge University, and a PhD from Essex, on Darwin as writer and scientist, he became a lecturer in comparative literature at Manchester University. He was active in the Hardy Society, editing the Thomas Hardy Journal for several years, worked quietly for the Campaign to Protect Rural England, and spent a lot of time caring for his mother, who lived to a great age.Eventually, he moved to Plymouth and in 2010 took over from me as the editor of the little magazine The Interpreter's House, which he made, in Hardy's phrase, "a house of hospitalities". We were both determined that it shouldn't be just a platform for the editor's friends but should be open to good poets of all stripes.But early in 2013 all plans had to be shelved as this active outdoor man was diagnosed with incurable cancer. Though paralysed below the waist, he remained positive, continued to watch the yellowhammers outside his window and never allowed his many visitors to feel downhearted. Shoestring Press rushed out a volume of his new and selected poems, Comet Over Greens Norton, which contains all his best work.Simon was old-fashioned in the best kind of ways, a former 1960s student who canvassed for Labour but who dressed conservatively and retained a stiff upper lip and immaculate manners. He hated pollution, literary infighting, and public greed and waste. He loved bird-watching, football, woodcuts and the Lake District.-bio via Merryn Williams' 2014 Obituary for Curtis in The Guardian This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit dailypoempod.substack.com/subscribe

Författaren Tora Dahl (1886-1982) såg hur föraktet för barn fördes vidare mellan generationerna. Vi har fortfarande mycket att lära av henne, menar Eva-Lotta Hultén i denna essä. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. Publicerades första gången 2021-10-18.Under många år tänkte jag att jag någon gång skulle skriva en biografi över Tora Dahl. Hennes serie om flickan Gunborgs uppväxt var en av min ungdoms stora läsupplevelser och jag tyckte att Tora Dahl blivit orättvist bortglömd. Men andra hann före.Tora Dahl hade en särskild förmåga att skildra inte minst det lilla barnets känslor. Jag var i tonåren när jag läste hennes sju böcker långa svit om fosterbarnet Gunborg, byggd på Tora Dahls uppväxt, och jag hade min egen barndom i hyfsat färskt minne. Själv var Tora Dahl 68 år när första delen kom ut, men hon verkade minnas allt med skärpa och jag kände igen mig själv: nyfikenheten, förundran inför de vuxnas ofta obegripliga ord och handlingar, känslan av att bli missförstådd och inte tagen på allvar.I sin biografi "Jag vill skriva sant. Tora Dahl och poeterna på Parkvägen" använder sig Jesper Högström av Tora Dahls dagböcker och det blir tydligt att känslor av att inte bli förstådd eller lyssnad till fortsatte att följa henne. Hennes egen man nedvärderade henne som författare och tänkare, liksom flera i den litterära umgängeskrets de tillhörde och där bland andra Artur Lundkvist, Gunnar Ekelöf och Erik Lindegren ingick. En scen som särskilt fastnar är den där Tora Dahl, som själv är mycket förtjust i barn men inte har några egna, bevittnar ett samspel mellan en mor och ett spädbarn som hon sedan återberättar för några av de andra och får veta att hon sett i syne. Bebisar kan inte samspela, de är tomma blad, vet dessa andra barnlösa personer att berätta för henne.Barn är ju så ointressanta!Också en annan scen återger hur hon blir nedlåtande bemött för att hon vill prata om barn. En liten pojke hon träffat visade henne sina bokmärken och hon är glad över det korta mötet. Artur Lundqvist tittar på henne som hon inte är riktigt klok när hon berättar och maken, kritikern och essäisten Knut Jaensson, blir generad över att hon vill ta upp deras tid med detta. Barn är ju så ointressanta!Jesper Högström konstaterar på något ställe i sin biografi att Tora Dahl fyller sida efter sida i sin dagbok med tankar om hur vår uppfostran formar barn men han skriver ganska lite om vad det är hon faktiskt tänker om detta.Barns liv och föreställningsvärld är centrala inte bara i hennes dagböcker utan också i flera av hennes publicerade verk. Jag söker i en av hennes essäböcker, också den en viktig läsupplevelse i min ungdom, efter mer av hennes tankar på området. "Om växande och om förtryck" heter boken. I den kopplar Tora Dahl föraktet för barn till föraktet för allt som växer. Hon ondgör sig över hur vi vänder oss till det levande och säger att det ingenting är värt i sig självt utan får sitt värde av den som formar eller nyttjar det. Hon kopplar också förtrycket av barn till andra sorters förtryck. Tyranner finns både i form av totalitära diktatorer och föräldrar som trycker ner och omformar sina barn med straff, hot eller belöningar. Alla varelser har rätt till sin egenart, menar Tora Dahl.Hennes reflektioner får mig att tänka på hur ett par äldre kvinnor, när jag var nybliven mamma, oberoende av varandra berättade för mig att de var avundsjuka på dagens unga föräldrar som kelade med eller ammade sina barn när barnen påkallade att de behövde det. Själva hade de hållit sig till sin tids råd: barnet skulle bara plockas upp när det skulle äta eller bytas på – och tiderna för det var strikt reglerade. Mat högst var fjärde timme så inte barnen blev bortskämda eller klemiga. Däremellan kunde de gott skrika sig till sömns. Dessa äldre kvinnor hade lytt råden trots att det värkt i själen på dem.Idag tänker vi väl inte längre så?Det var så man såg på barn och barnuppfostran när Tora Dahl blev näpst för att hon visade intresse för barns känsloliv och kommunikation. Idag tänker vi väl inte längre så?Medan jag läser Tora Dahls essäer snubblar jag över en artikel i Riksförbundets Attentions medlemstidning. Den handlar om en pappa till ett barn som under flera år vägrade att gå till skolan. Mannen var, samtidigt som sonen skolstrejkade, utbildningschef i en kommun i Värmland. Han berättar hur alla, när sonen slutade gå till skolan, försökte få honom dit igen. Men pappan ångrar att han var med och pushade. För, som han säger i intervjun, "alla tittade på sonen, ingen tittade på skolan."Det var ju skolan som gjort sonen sjuk, ändå förväntades han böja sig krokig för att passa in där. Och pappan skäms över att han själv pressat sonen med "Man kan inte ha roligt jämt", och "Du vänjer dig". Nu försöker pappan skapa den skola hans barn hade behövt, där det finns avskildhet för dem som är i behov av det och där varken barn eller föräldrar ombeds skärpa sig när skolgången blir övermäktig.De här förväntningarna om att alla barn ska klara samma saker och trivas i samma miljöer, och hårdheten som hela tiden hörs i debatten – de ständiga kraven på mer krav och gnället över att dagens barn är bortskämda och överkänsliga – är det inte samma gamla förakt för det som lever och växer som också Tora Dahl försökte göra upp med? Vad händer med den som aldrig får känna att den duger eller att det den gör räcker? Hur långt ska vi egentligen gå i våra försök att forma barnen efter samhällsinstitutionerna istället för tvärtom? Hur mycket psykisk ohälsa bland unga tål Sverige?Hur mycket psykisk ohälsa bland unga tål Sverige?Tora Dahl såg hur föraktet för barn internaliserades och fördes vidare mellan generationerna. Den som mötts med hårdhet blev själv hård och hon skriver: "Vi har både tyrannen och barnet inom oss, det frågande och rättframma barnet och tyrannen som föraktar detta barn därför att det ingenting har att komma med som kan göra sig gällande." Hon citerar poeten Wordsworth som skrivit att 'Barnet är mannens fader'. I oss alla finns det barn vi en gång var kvar och fortsätter forma vilka vi är som vuxna.Jag samåkte en gång med en engelsman i någon timme. Det var när mina egna barn var små och jag precis hade börjat arbeta igen. Mannen ville berätta för mig om sin egen frus tid hemma med barnen. Hur frustrerande han tyckte det var att se denna framgångsrika yrkeskvinna degradera sig själv – i hans tycke – till att bara prata om blöjbyten och matning. Jag svarade syrligt att det här var ett av skälen till att jag var glad att min egen man delat tiden hemma med våra barn med mig: att han begrep att blöjbyten och matning faktiskt är mycket viktiga saker när man har med små människor att göra.Det blev alldeles tyst i bilen och jag undvek avsiktligt att lätta upp stämningen genom att börja prata om annat. Det är få saker jag har så svårt för som människor som nedvärderar barns behov och upplevelser. Men om jag varit klokare och mer storsint hade jag kanske i hans barnförakt kunnat se det förtryckta barn han möjligen varit själv en gång.Eva-Lotta Hultén

Elizabeth Bancroft went to England with her husband, historian George Bancroft, for three of the most dynamic years in European history. As Ambassador to England from the United States, George moved in the highest circles. In his wife's letters to their sons, her uncle, her brother, and Mrs. Polk (the President's wife), we see glimpses not only of early Victorian English life, but also of Queen Victoria herself! Mrs. Bancroft speaks of dinners with Benjamin Disraeli, visits to Wordsworth, weekends in the country with Louis Napoleon and Sir Robert Peel with such matter of fact aplomb that one cannot help being impressed.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Elizabeth Bancroft went to England with her husband, historian George Bancroft, for three of the most dynamic years in European history. As Ambassador to England from the United States, George moved in the highest circles. In his wife's letters to their sons, her uncle, her brother, and Mrs. Polk (the President's wife), we see glimpses not only of early Victorian English life, but also of Queen Victoria herself! Mrs. Bancroft speaks of dinners with Benjamin Disraeli, visits to Wordsworth, weekends in the country with Louis Napoleon and Sir Robert Peel with such matter of fact aplomb that one cannot help being impressed.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A Video on Wordsworth's Poem on Persecution

What I'm After (Sir Charles Remix) / Lords O... 5:52 Keep On Rockin / Lords Of The Undergroun... 2:39 Everything's Fine / Degiheugi & Miscellaneo... 3:48 Rakim / Cookin Soul x Westside Gunn 2:04 Tha Riddle Of Steel / Tha God Fahim & Nich... 2:18 Citrus Nioxide (Feat. Danny Brown) (Prod. B... 4:21 Read The Message feat. Wordsworth, Finale... 3:42 Life Is What You Make It feat. Chubb Rock &... 4:18 Shaolin Vs. Lama / Raekwon & Inspectah De... 3:52 Endangered Innocence (Feat. Ghostface Kill... 4:06 Here We Are Heard (Feat. The Impossebulls... 3:04 All Guns Full Ammo feat. Onyx (prod. by C-L... 4:01 It Factor (Feat. El-P) / Boldy James & Real B... 3:55 Plaid Patterns (Feat. Awon & Debonair P) / F... 4:05 Mmm Hmm / Tone Spliff 3:11

This week, Andy Zaltzman is joined by elite-tier Bugler and guest producer Belinda (as well as Nish Kumar and Tom Ballard) delivering a show so saucy it might get you banned from the Vatican gift shop.

Dr. Carolyn Weber returns to the show to peruse Jack's bookshelf and explore the poetry of William Wordsworth.[Show Notes]

Have you ever wondered why Jane Austen isn't counted among the Romantics of her era when she is now known now as the most romantic of writers? Julia and Katy take a deep dive into what Romantism was (poets such as Wordsworth and Byron) and discuss how Jane connected or criticised the literary movement of her era. In short, this episode is everything you need to know about Romanticism and were too afraid to ask!We end with our latest news about Jane Austen events and Julia's new book The Wordsworth Key which you can find here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Wordsworth-Key-page-turning-historical-adventure-ebook/dp/B0DSZ94PDW/ or at your local bookseller.

Michael O'Neill & William Newton-Wordsworth react to the clip of Penny Wrong of Labour showing complete disregard for the wishes of the Australian Public when they overwhelmingly rejected the Referendum on 'The Voice' - which was a patent attempt by the Marxist Leftists to divide the country across fabricated racial lines. Labour's Wrong indicated that if Labour is voted in again, they will simply ignore the clear wishes of the Australian voters.This is a warning to everyone casting their vote on May 3 2025.Links:William Newton-Wordsworth - GAP Candidate 2025: https://rumble.com/v6sdar3-william-newton-wordsworth-gap-candidate-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpMichael O'Neill on Leading HEART Party and Supporting Barbara O'Neill: https://rumble.com/v6smi1t-michael-oneill-on-leading-heart-party-and-supporting-barbara-oneill.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpHEART Party: https://heartparty.com.auGreat Australian Party: https://www.greataustralianparty.com.au--------FreeNZ:https://freenz.carrd.co

Bianca speaks to Cindy Anderson from Wordsworth Books about the rise in Romantasy and some book recommendations for the coming season. Lunch with Pippa Hudson is CapeTalk’s mid-afternoon show. This 2-hour respite from hard news encourages the audience to take the time to explore, taste, read and reflect. The show - presented by former journalist, baker and water sports enthusiast Pippa Hudson - is unashamedly lifestyle driven. Popular features include a daily profile interview #OnTheCouch at 1:10pm. Consumer issues are in the spotlight every Wednesday while the team also unpacks all things related to health, wealth & the environment. Listen live – Lunch with Pippa Hudson is broadcast weekdays between 13:00 and 15:00 (SA Time) https://www.primediaplus.com/station/capetalk Find all the catch-up podcasts here https://www.primediaplus.com/capetalk/lunch-with-pippa-hudson/show-podcasts/lunch-with-pippa-hudson/ Subscribe to the CapeTalk daily and weekly newsletters https://www.primediaplus.com/competitions/newsletter-subscription/ Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: www.facebook.com/CapeTalk   CapeTalk on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@capetalk   CapeTalk on Instagram: www.instagram.com/capetalkza  CapeTalk on X: www.x.com/CapeTalk  CapeTalk on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Full show: https://kNOwBETTERHIPHOP.com Artist Played: The Beat Ministry, Wordsworth, WordChemist, MurDoc, Marz Mello, conshus, Truly Def, Aubrey West, Juni Ali, Seun Kuti, Egypt 80, Sampa The Great, Silas Short, Adrian Quesada, Angelica Garcia, Royce Wood Junior, 14KT, Buff1, Y A N A, Gena, Gnarly, The Workin Class, Chev, Noveliss, Serebii, Bathe, DJ Design, Gennessee, Che Noir, Tryf Bindope, Tekbeatz, Femi Kuti, Travisty The Lazy Emcee, PFM, lavender, OutKast, GOODie MOb, IMAKEMADBEATS

Think you know the Lake District? Think again. Join us on an epic audio journey as we peel back the layers of Cumbria to reveal a side you probably never expected—one bursting with art, heritage, and culture. When most people picture the Lake District, they see shimmering lakes, rugged fells, and charming country inns. And yes, all that is spectacular—but what if we told you this region is so much more than scenic hikes and boat trips? Beyond the well-trodden trails, Cumbria has long been a magnet for creatives, from poets and painters to musicians and makers. And it's not just about Wordsworth and his daffodils—Cumbria's cultural scene is alive and kicking.  Artists, musicians, and theatre-makers have put down roots here, turning former textile mills into buzzing creative hubs and filling historic venues with new concepts and fresh exhibits. We're stepping off the tourist trail to explore a different side of Cumbria. Think ancient abbeys, maritime museums that tell the region's shipbuilding past, and grand houses that played a key role in the early Quaker movement.  There's even an auto museum packed with classic cars and unexpected stories and vintage treasures. So, if you thought the Lake District was all about hiking boots and boat trips, get ready to see it in a whole new way. Thanks to Cumbria Tourism for supporting this episode of Travel Goals. The Let's Go Culture project is funded by the UK government through the UK Shared Prosperity Fund and is supported by Westmorland & Furness Council. #UKSPF ***** Hi, I'm your podcast host, Portia Jones [nicknamed Pip Jones]. I'm a freelance travel journalist, podcaster, and Lonely Planet author.  If you love to travel, check out my travel website and subscribe to my travel newsletter to get travel guides and new episodes of the Travel Goals podcast delivered straight to your inbox. Connect with us on social media: Travel Goals on Instagram | Travel Goals on Facebook  Travel Goals is produced and owned by South Girl Production Music and Podcasting Ltd.  Email us to discuss working together or with any questions about the podcast.  Enjoy the show, and don't forget to leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

We begin a week of selections from Lyrical Ballads with today's nostalgic and pastoral poem, “Lines Written a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey, on Revisiting the Banks of the Wye during a Tour, July 13, 1798.” Happy reading!Jonathan Kerr of the Wordsworth Trust writes about the revolutionary context of the Lyrical Ballads and the revolutionary nature of the project itself:“Wordsworth and Coleridge's first major literary undertaking and a pioneering work of English Romanticism – came into being at a tumultuous moment in England's history…Not since the English Revolution had the country faced such alarming upheaval and discord within its borders.On first glance it might not seem like the little collection authored by Wordsworth and Coleridge has much to do with this heady and factional atmosphere. Lyrical Ballads came about in the spring and summer of 1798, when the Coleridge and Wordsworth families lived as neighbours in the secluded village of Holford, Somerset. Wordsworth and Coleridge had only known one another a short time, but they became quick friends and mutually-admiring colleagues. The small village provided both poets with a break from the spirited goings-on of cities like London and Bristol, which could often be dangerous places for young men with unorthodox opinions. Coleridge and Wordsworth, both committed reformers through the early years of the French Revolution, knew this is as well as anybody, and their retreat into the country was motivated as much by concerns for their personal security as anything else.…Whether or not Wordsworth and Coleridge continued to sympathize with the revolution abroad, there can be little doubt that with Lyrical Ballads the two were committed to one kind of revolution at least, a revolution in the sphere of poetry and art. Lyrical Ballads is among other things an attempt to purify poetry of the cold conventions which had come to dominate the literary scene, at least according to both poets; in place of this, Wordsworth and Coleridge wanted to bring poetry back to what is most common and recognizable, and also most important, within our emotional, social, and imaginative lives. If this doesn't seem like such an extraordinary undertaking today, this might owe to the remarkable success of Wordsworth and Coleridge's quiet revolution on the literary front.” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit dailypoempod.substack.com/subscribe

Today is the Vernal Equinox. We're promised incremental victories of light. But early spring is no darling — not here in the high desert. Here, she can be chafing and mercurial; she can show up in sputtering, immature fits and freezes; in mean winds that would cut down the most tender and flower-faced among us without reason.Earlier this week, the sky howled and turned the color of mud at mid-day. Cell phones blared out public safety warnings. Dust agitated at every seam.What's a nervous system to do? Have mercy on the tender-hearted, Lord — on the dream of apricots and cherries, and the boy at school pickup who is rubbing and rubbing his nose against the back of his chapped hand.Like you, I am learning to find refuge. I am learning to take shelter in the soft aliveness of my body; remembering in adulthood what came so easily and imaginatively to my younger self — how to build a fort, how to tuck into a small world of my own making.So, I gather a reading light, a ball of yarn, knitting needles, and a poetry collection, and I tent a wool blanket over my head to hole up for the duration.One thing I know for sure is how a poem can serve like the keel of a boat, offering stability and resistance against sideways forces. A poem — a few words that, when linked together at an angle just so, can carry us into and beyond their meaning. And so it is with this needfulness, under a blanket in my living room, that I come to Wordsworth's “Lines Written in Early Spring,” a meditation he wrote in 1798 on the joyful, interwoven consciousness of nature — a “thousand blended notes” of birdsong — and humanity's grievous failure to remember its place under the canopy of all things.In the grove where the speaker sits, twigs “spread out their fan,” flowers “enjoy the air,” and Nature, personified, is a force with a “holy plan.” But human beings, the speaker laments, have lost the splendrous sensibilities of spring: “If such be Nature's holy plan / Have I not reason to lament / What man has made of man?”It occurs to me that man has done many good things with his hands. I am thinking now of a live performance of Rachmaninoff's Piano Concerto No. 2, or the sweater that Wendy-from-the-yarn-shop just masterfully knitted, or the perfectly packaged mini-waffles my friend Ted brought back from a recent trip to Japan.But much of the time, we get things at least half-wrong. Like seed-creatures, we struggle to find our way upward through hard ground. We move too quickly, unaware of our conditions, and make mistakes. We forget to pause and remember the purpose of our unearthing. And we forget the interweave, the garden of our original belonging.So, I'm teaching myself how to knit. Novice that I am, it's awkward work. It's near-in. I tink (a new word for me, a semordnilap that refers to the act of un-stitching) almost as often as I knit. I struggle to position my hands, to maintain the right angle, I poke around and lose count and then I have to begin again.And in all this seeming progress and unraveling, as I return to mistakes embedded long ago, a new pattern — peaceful and even elegant — is steadily emerging. Oh, nervous system, dear friend. I am un-stitching and stitching myself back together again. I am braiding threads of myself into an artwork of my own making, which is weaving me back into something greater than my own making. And when the thing is ready, I will hold it up in wonder. I will hold it to my cheek.Together, we are making sense of being human in an era of radical change. Your presence here matters. Thank you for reading, sharing, ‘heart'ing, commenting, and subscribing to The Guest House. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit shawnparell.substack.com/subscribe

Suzanne Degges-White applies early 19th-century wisdom to our present situation.

We have now established the tradition of beginning each series with a walking episode. The first was around the city of Sheffield and our second is around Grasmere in the Lake District. Made famous by the Lakeland poets and especially William Wordsworth and his sister Dorothy who lived in Dove Cottage, Grasmere town sits next to the lake of the same name. We began at the cottage and the wonderful museum dedicated to the Wordsworths and then walked right around the lake. We encountered other walkers and then finished off in the Churchyard where the Wordsworth's are buried. We stayed the night in the wonderful Traveler's Rest on the edge of the town. The next morning we headed up towards Easdale and the path up to the Tarn looking over Sour Milk Gill. Thanks to all the people we encountered on the walk for their time and obvious love of the Lakes. We would recommend Dorothy Wordsworth's Grasmere Journal, any version of the Prelude by William Wordsworth and Jonathan Bates excellent biography Radical Wordsworth. For Coleridge's Frost At Midnight click https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43986/frost-at-midnight 

Talking points: masculinity, culture, gratitude, anger, poetryI don't typically get starstruck or awed in interviews, even though I've talked to many incredible people. But David? Well, he's had an immense impact on my life, and so much of my work and way of thinking lives inspired by him. He joined me in Seattle and shared so much wisdom, beauty, and of course, poetry. Dig into this one.(00:00:00) - What is the “conversational nature of reality”, why the unknown is so uncomfortable, and the fear of “descent”(00:18:44) - How the need for control kills off meaning and purpose, and how real poetry and philosophy come from NOT knowing what to say(00:25:53) - David reads “Blessing of the Morning Light”(00:32:42) - How does a man start building a relationship to the unknown parts of himself, and David's relationship with his father(00:44:24) - The role of anger and the power of poetry(00:56:16) - On forgiveness and male friendship(01:31:57) - How do you properly thank someone who's had a profound impact on you?David Whyte is an internationally renowned poet and author, and a scintillating and moving speaker. Behind these talents lies a very physical attempt to give voice to the wellsprings of human identity, human striving and, most difficult of all, the possibilities for human happiness. He draws from hundreds of memorized poems, his own and those of other beloved poets such as Wordsworth, Emily Dickinson, Keats, Pablo Neruda, Fleur Adcock and the sonnets of Shakespeare. He is the author of ten books of poetry, three books of prose on the transformative nature of work; a widely-acclaimed, best-selling book of essays, and an extensive audio collection.Connect with David-Website: https://davidwhyte.com/-Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/davidjwhyte/-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PoetDavidWhyte/-YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@poetdavidwhyte-SubStack: https://davidwhyte.substack.com/***Pick up my book, Men's Work: A Practical Guide To Face Your Darkness, End Self-Sabotage, And Find Freedom: https://mantalks.com/mens-work-book/Heard about attachment but don't know where to start? Try the FREE Ultimate Guide To AttachmentCheck out some other free resources: How To Quit Porn | Anger Meditation | How To Lead In Your RelationshipBuild brotherhood with a powerful group of like-minded men from around the world. Check out The Alliance. Enjoy the podcast? If so, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or

1/2: #AFRICA: WAGNER GROUP TAKEOVER FOR GOLD. RONAN WORDSWORTH, @GPFUTURES 1911 NIGERIA

2/2: #AFRICA: WAGNER GROUP TAKEOVER FOR GOLD. RONAN WORDSWORTH, @GPFUTURES 1823

PREVIEW: AFRICA: RUSSIA: PRC: Colleague Ronan Wordsworth explains the transformation of Francophone Africa colonies to Wagner Group outposts that usher in China resource exploitation while grabbing larger shares of the gold fields. More later. 1885

durée : 00:55:18 - Very Good Trip - par : Michka Assayas - Au menu de ce Very Good Trip, la voix d'une femme qui ne ressemblait à aucune autre. Michka Assayas consacrait cette émission à Marianne Faithfull à l'occasion de la sortie d'un album ou elle ne chantait pas mais récitait ses poèmes anglais préférés, Tennyson, Wordsworth, Keats et Byron.

Today's poem, though written for the far more infrequent crowning of monarchs, contains plenty of sentiments fitting for a quadrennial presidential inauguration. Happy reading.On a pillar on the west wall of Poets' Corner in Westminster Abbey is a white marble bust to poet and clergyman John Keble. The bust is signed and dated by Thomas Woolner, 1872 and is just inscribed 'JOHN KEBLE'. The memorial was originally much more elaborate and was in the south west tower chapel of the nave (now St George's chapel), placed between Dr Thomas Arnold and William Wordsworth. The bust, on a foliated corbel, was set within a decorated oval frame set with jewels with two small pillars either side of the bust. Above was a decorated cross and below a square tablet with the inscription:In memory of John Keble, author of the Christian Year. Born 1792. Died 1866. In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength. Isaiah xxx.15. He rests in peace at Hursley of which he was Vicar 30 years.When the chapel was redesigned in 1932 the memorials there were all moved - Arnold to the north west nave chapel and Wordsworth to Poets' Corner. Only the bust of Keble was retained and mounted on a new Purbeck marble bracket in the Corner.He was born at Fairford in Gloucestershire on 25th April 1792, son of the Reverend John Keble and his wife Sarah (Maule). After education at home he attended Oxford University. In 1827 he published his popular work The Christian Year. He was professor of poetry at Oxford and became rector of Hursley in Hampshire in 1836. With Newman and Pusey he instigated the Oxford Movement. He married Charlotte Clarke but there were no children. He died on 29th March 1866 and is buried at Hursley. Keble College in Oxford was founded in his memory.-bio via Westminster Abbey This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit dailypoempod.substack.com/subscribe

Episode 41 is a brief history and scoring of Dipset member, Juelz Santana (2003) & underground rapper Wordsworth (2004). Next episode we move into a new calendar year of 2005.

...in which we visit Keswick Museum for a deep dive into the life of one of Romantic Lakeland's most under-appreciated figures: writer, former Poet Laureate and long-term resident of Greta Hall, Robert Southey (1774-1843). In the company of Museum curator Nicola Lawson and trustee Charlotte May, we return to Bristol, 1774 and set the shifting social scene for the birth of a young radical – expelled from Westminster – whose education was beset by bullying. Alongside new wife Edith Fricker and creative soulmate Samuel Taylor Coleridge, we follow Southey north to Keswick and learn about daily life at Greta Hall, where the young poet became sole breadwinner in a busy household of sisters and their home-educated children. With tragedy a constant in the Southeys' life – four of the couples' eight children died before reaching adulthood – we discuss Edith's enduring mental illness, the fast-growing Keswick of the early 1800s, and the great joy Southey derived from family and domestic life. Reflecting on a (sometimes) controversial and (always) prodigious writing talent (Southey's output far eclipsed that of Wordsworth or Coleridge), we namecheck some of his finest works: from the first published version of Goldilocks and the three bears (The Story of the Three Bears) through his remarkable História do Brasil to the onomatopoeic masterpiece The Cataract of Lodore. Brazing the frosty cold, we conclude our conversation alongside Southey's grave at Crosthwaite Church, where we consider his relationship with Keswick and the great loss felt at the death of a towering talent and an adored family man. You can find out more about Southey and Keswick at Keswick Museum: keswickmuseum.org.uk The Museum is on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter/X.

In his final Sophia Lecture, “Finitude and the Infinite,” Dr Iain McGilchrist grapples with the vital role that the imagination plays in the perception of reality, and what this power can disclose about reality itself. He shows that imagination has the capacity to make contact with an illimitable, irreducible, and inexhaustible world, one that presents itself to us under the aspects of finitude and infinitude. Beginning with the English Romantic poets, McGilchrist shows how these artists resisted the habits of perception that can be associated with the brain's left hemisphere. This part of the brain is adept at rendering, representing, and modeling, but it does so at the cost of simplifying whatever it constructs. Poets like Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley, and Blake strove to remove the film of familiarity from their vision. For them, imagination was the power that made intuitive connections and integrative “leaps,” giving access to a richer, unbounded reality not subject to the strictures of reductive categories. In dialogue with physicists, philosophers, and mathematicians, McGilchrist ultimately shows how the vision of the world offered by the Romantic poets lays claim to the infinite and the eternal. For these artists, eternity is “adverbial”: it is a way of being, a manner, and a modality. McGilchrist convincingly shows us that we, too, can decline to see the world through categories that are measurable, predictable, and countable—but finally lifeless; like the poets whom he takes as his main interlocutors in this lecture, we can, instead, open ourselves to reality's boundless, vital, and infinite character. Authors and Works Mentioned in this Episode: William Wordsworth - Preface to the Lyrical Ballads Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Biographia Literaria Percy Bysshe Shelley - A Defence of Poetry Max Scheler William Blake Richard Feynman James A. Shapiro Denis Diderot Barbara McClintock William James Albert Einstein Leonhard Euler William Wilson Morgan Richard Feynman The Ancient of Days (William Blake, 1794, watercolor etching) Nicholas of Cusa - De Docta Ignorantia Jason Padgett Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Galileo Galilei David Hilbert Henri Bergson Richard Wagner Isaac Luria - Lurianic Kabbalah Edward Nelson Alfred North Whitehead Eugène Minkowski Heraclitus Jordan Peterson Zeno of Elea John Milton John Keats Jorge Luis Borges Martin Heidegger Tao-te Ching William Blake - “The Tyger” Emily Dickinson Marianne Moore Robert Browning - “Two in the Campagna” Bhagavad Gita Peter Cook John Polkinghorne Mary Midgley René Descartes Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling J. B. S. Haldane Lee Smolin Eugene Koonin Hildegard of Bingen - The Choirs of Angels Christ Pantocrator and Signs of the Zodiac C. S. Lewis Johannes Kepler Jesus

Full show: https://kNOwBETTERHIPHOP.com Artist Played: Colette Chantel, conshus, AMiAM, Omar Saleem, Philly Wyld Chyld, Sai T, Errol Eats Everything, Thee Sacred Souls, Stu Bangas, Wordsworth, Elzhi, Joao Selva, Ras Kass, Obvious Bane, TOKiMONSTA, MyGrane McNastee, Miramar, Connie Price and The Keystones, Fullee Love aka Soup of Jurassic 5, Hasizzle, Professor Shorthair, Catpack, Bruk Rogers, Trini Elev8, D-Rock aka Rock Solid, Crazy DJ Bazarro, Nejma Nefertiti, Napoleon Da Legend, The Bongo Hop, Nidia Gongora, Paradox, John Da Lemon, Jermiside, Killer Mike and Sleepy Brown, OutKast, GOODie MOb, IMAKEMADBEATS

1/ K. BURNS & HIYAH777. Clear the Map ft. Tristate. 2/ CANNIBAL OX. Why’s water wet. 3/ ROC MARCIANO & THE ALCHEMIST. Acid. 4/ SOL MESSIAH X ELOH KUSH. Carved initialz. feat. Supreme Cerebral. 5/ FASHAWN AND LITTLE VIC. One eyed king. 6/ B-Real & Psycho Les. Laugh 2 da bank. 7/ REDMAN. lalala. feat METHOD MAN. 8/ Apollo Brown & CRIMEAPPLE. Mis Amigos. 9/ Blu & Shafiq Husayn. We Bang (feat. MED, Thurz, and YaH-Ra). 10/ JAY WORTHY AND DJ FRESH. No Gimmicks. feat KEAK Da Sneak.11/ KENDRICK LAMAR. TV off.12/ AB SOUL. California Dream. feat VINCE STAPLES, KAMM KARSON.13/ TY FARRIS. Alchemy in the trenches.14/ Your Old Droog. What else?. 15/ Elcamino & Real Bad Man. No fighting. feat Boldy James. 16/ Wordsworth & Stu Bangas. God 's mailbox. feat PAV BANDY. 17/ Benny The Butcher y 38 Spesh. Internal Affairs. feat OT The RealEscuchar audio

V6EP55: "One Time For Rick - Top 5 Hip-Hop Albums Of 2024 (Special Edition)"Dub, Jig, and Pat return for the last episode of 2024. They get into what they've been up to for the holidays and show off brand new items for the "Show-N-Prove" segment before jumping right into "Timeline Tingz" where they discuss a possible joint album between Eminem and 50 Cent, and Jay-Z's accuser allowed to remain anonymous. "Just Brandess" shares what she thinks about Hip-Hop in 2024 and her expectations for Hip-Hop in 2025 before sharing her thoughts on the passing of our brother Rick0378. One Time For Rick! The squad then pays homage to Rick, discussing the affect he's had and still has on the podcast, his extensive knowledge on Hip-Hop, Marvel and how selfless and giving he was. They then give Kincee Babyface Pearlis a call to say a few words about Rick. *We encountered some technical difficulties* In the "Yes Yes Ya'll" and "Droppin' Gems" segment, the squad shares their personal top ten Hip-Hop albums of 2024. The squad then average their lists into a collective top five discussing the reasoning behind why they chose the albums that they chose and Dub pulls some of Rick's Did You Knows out of the archives to share them. All of that plus much more on an all-new episode of Hip Hop Marvels Podcast! "WE GOT IT LOCKED FROM THE BLOCK TO THE COMIC SHOP!"SHEDRICK EUGENE LUCAS (1973-2024) R.I.P.HHMP TOP 5 HIP-HOP ALBUMS OF 2024:1. "GNX" Kendrick Lamar 2. "Might Delete Later" J. Cole3. "Chromakopia" Tyler The Creator4. "Blue Lips" ScHoolboy Q5. "Glorious" GloRillaDISCLAIMER: Lists are subjective... These are our PERSONAL choices. Let us know your top 5 Hip Hop albums of 2024!FANTASTIC 4:1. Da Beatminerz, Wordsworth, The Last Emperor - It's Not Enough (One of Rick's Favorites)2. Illpo - Mar A Lago3. Lil' Baby, Young Thug, Future - Dum, Dumb & Dumber4. Mad Skillz - 2024 Rap UpSPONSORED BY:Alpine Bagel CafeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CAROLINA UNION,209 South Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599       LISTEN-SHARE-RATE-SUBSCRIBE: Pandora, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Spotify, Audible, TuneIn, iHeartRadio, Castbox, Stitcher, Podcast Addict & anywhere else you get your podcasts!Have a question,  comment or suggestion? Email us: hiphopmarvels@gmail.comHIP HOP MARVELS is movement focusing on the impact Marvel Comics/Entertainment has on the culture of Hip Hop and vice-versa. Your friendly neighborhood plug for all things Hip Hop and Marvel! "WE GOT IT LOCKED FROM THE BLOCK TO THE COMIC SHOP!"Creator/Executive Producer/Host: DJ Dub Floyd (@djdubfloyd)Producer/Director/Sound: Hasani Wizzard (@dovestatus) Director/Music/Host: Pat Mulli (@southerndrawl_410_side_ent)Co-Host: Rick 0378 (@braille378)Co-Host: E-Ray (@lionheadcircle)Co-Host: Double T (@t91t91)Co-Host: JigPool (@jigpoolnc) Correspondent/Co-Host: Brandess (@8tiesbaby82)HHMP Intro: Bash Brothers - Precyce Politix (@cyceboogie), Mallz (@mallzini), Sharp Cuts (@sharpcutsofficial)Music: Sharp Cuts (@sharpcutsofficial), Tecknowledgy (@teckbeats), Kreatev (@kreatev)www.hiphopmarvels.comTwitter: @hiphopmarvelsIG: @hiphopmarvelsFB: https://www.facebook.com/hiphopmarvelsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hiphopmarvels

BANG! @southernvangard radio Ep422! Better late than never, folks. The holiday season is something' else, ain't it? This may or may not be the last show of 2024 - if it is - YOU WAAAAALCOME and if it isn't…YOU WAAAAALCOME #SmithsonianGrade #WeAreTheGard // southernvangard.com // @southernvangard on all platforms #hiphop #undergroundhiphop #boombap ---------- Recorded live Dec 15, 2024 @ Dirty Blanket Studios, Marietta, GA southernvangard.com @southernvangard on all platforms #SmithsonianGrade #WeAreTheGard twitter/IG: @southernvangard @jondoeatl @cappuccinomeeks ---------- Pre-Game Beats - Vanderslice "Southern Vangard Theme" - Bobby Homack & The Southern Vangard All-Stars Talk Break Inst. - "Epic Miraculous Music For The Season" - Kev Brown "Something Strange" - Wordsworth & Stu Bangas "Shameless" - Dookie Bros "My First Android" - OC from NC "Capo" - Fashawn & Little Vic "Detonate" - Venomous2000 ft. DJ Grazzhoppa & DJ Spin "Boom Bap Or Die" - Termanology & Tek ft. Flash Is Hip Hop (prod. Nottz) "Walk Thru The Door" - NapsNdreds ft. Wordsworth (prod. D.R.U.G.S. Beats) "Words On Words" - Backwood Sweetie & K!NG jvmes ft. Knowitall Talk Break Inst. - "Rudy N Nem" - Kev Brown "Too Foul For Primetime" - Stu Bangas ft. Apathy X A-F-R-O X DJ Jon Doe "Allahs Interlude" - OC from NC ft. DJ Flash "Buena Vida" - The Musalini ft. Blannco (prod. Jose Cienfuegos) "Bounce & Nod" - Blame One & Chill-Ill "One Eyed King" - Fashawn & Little Vic "Vamos" - Fokis x DJ Sticky "When We Do It" - Spectac & Amiri ft. DJ Shakim ft. DJ Shakim "Doin' What You Never Did" - B-Real & Psycho Les "Wrath" - P.U.R.E. Talk Break Inst. - "I Miss U" - Kev Brown "Raining Sledgehammers" - Napoleon Da Legend & JR Swiftz ft. D-Styles "I Shit You Not" - Dookie Bros "Oh!" - Wordsworth & Stu Bangas "$MFD" - Money Mogly ft. Big J CSB "Top Rope" - Le Zeppo x 9th Uno ft. Hus Kingpin "Fools Gold" - M.A.V. x K Sluggah "Trillselda 2" - Bun B & Statik Selektah ft. Westside Gunn, Conway The Machine & Boldy James "Where To Begin" - Flee Lord & Richard Milli ft. Eddie Kaine & Rim Talk Break Inst. - "I'm Wakin Up Early!" / "Let's Go Play N Stuff" / "I Miss U" / "Once A Year" - Kev Brown

Episode 200: In this milestone episode, the 200th episode of Infinite Banter, Mark takes a trip down memory lane, with 20 segments highlighting past guests that span some of the episodes that have helped the show reach 200 episodes. There are flashback segments from a wide range of past interviews featuring- Jayson Warner Smith, Russell Todd, Theodus Crane, Pamela Davis-Noland, Nathan Hamill, Roxanne Perez, B. Brian Blair, Kyle Farnsworth, Akrobatik, Wordsworth, Res, Silver Spinner, Spyder D, DJ Chill Will, DJ Real One, EC Illa, Chubs, Young Zee, Kool Kim, Money B and Kool Rock Ski. Mark reflects on reaching the milestone episode and gives some of his favorite #200 issues of select comic books. Episode is dedicated to the memory of Mark Beans aka PreachCheck out our sponsor Super 7, for the latest in action figures and merch featuring pop culture icons. Click the link for the latest figures and more- https://super7.com/INFINITEBANTERPODCAST

V6EP54: "What If...?"The Squadron Supreme is BACK after a long hiatus!!!! Dub, Jigpool, Double T, E-Ray and Pat Mulli give us an update on what they've been up to. The squad debuts their brand new "Show-N-Prove" segment before jumping into "Timeline Tingz" where they discuss actor Colman Domingo meeting with Marvel Studios for a potential role, What If...? Season 3, Frank Miller illustrating a Galactus cover for Marvel's 2025 new What If...? series, Debbie Mathers passes away, as well as King Combs and Takeoff's SA lawsuits. They call up Brandess in her new segment "Just Brandess" where she shares her concerns about The Grand National Tour ticket prices. Drake announces The Anita Max Win Tour and shortly after Kendrick Lamar announces The Grand National Tour with SZA in which the squad goes off on many tangents. In the "Droppin' Gems" segment, they focus on the question... "What if the tables were turned and Drake was up instead of Kendrick right now?' and more tangents ensue. E-Ray sheds light on a few upcoming "Nexus Events" plus much more on an all-new episode of Hip Hop Marvels Podcast! "WE GOT IT LOCKED FROM THE BLOCK TO THE COMIC SHOP!"FANTASTIC 4:1. Roc Marciano, The Alchemist - Chopstick2. Skyzoo - Finders Keepers (Produced by Sir Williams)3. Consequence, Ghostface Killah, Rick Ross, Jim Jones, 38 Spesh - Blood Stain III (Produced by Ye)4. Wordsworth, Stu Bangas, Masta Ace - SolidifiedSPONSORED BY:Alpine Bagel CafeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CAROLINA UNION,209 South Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599       LISTEN-SHARE-RATE-SUBSCRIBE: Pandora, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Spotify, Audible, TuneIn, iHeartRadio, Castbox, Stitcher, Podcast Addict & anywhere else you get your podcasts!Have a question,  comment or suggestion? Email us: hiphopmarvels@gmail.comHIP HOP MARVELS is movement focusing on the impact Marvel Comics/Entertainment has on the culture of Hip Hop and vice-versa. Your friendly neighborhood plug for all things Hip Hop and Marvel! "WE GOT IT LOCKED FROM THE BLOCK TO THE COMIC SHOP!"Creator/Executive Producer/Host: DJ Dub Floyd (@djdubfloyd)Producer/Director/Sound: Hasani Wizzard (@dovestatus) Director/Music/Host: Pat Mulli (@southerndrawl_410_side_ent)Co-Host: Rick 0378 (@braille378)Co-Host: E-Ray (@lionheadcircle)Co-Host: Double T (@t91t91)Co-Host: JigPool (@jigpoolnc) Correspondent/Co-Host: Brandess (@8tiesbaby82)HHMP Intro: Bash Brothers - Precyce Politix (@cyceboogie), Mallz (@mallzini), Sharp Cuts (@sharpcutsofficial)Music: Sharp Cuts (@sharpcutsofficial), Tecknowledgy (@teckbeats), Kreatev (@kreatev)www.hiphopmarvels.comTwitter: @hiphopmarvelsIG: @hiphopmarvelsFB: https://www.facebook.com/hiphopmarvelsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hiphopmarvels

Full show: https://kNOwBETTERHIPHOP.com Artist Played: Sincere Vega, conshus, DJ Dolo76, Stove God Cooks, Joao Selva, Lyrics Born, Joyo Velarde, MikeTempo, Al Green, Mighty Theodore, Vast Aire, Psalm One, Stu Bangas, Wordsworth, DJ Jon Doe, Breeze Brewin, John Robinson, Wu-Tang Clan, Bofaatbeatz, GI, Leisure Chief, REKS, Nasty P, Roosevelt, K-Rec, 4-IZE, Knaladeus, Kaimbr, Dj Applejac, Wayna, The Allergies, Hip Hop Headucatorz, Cool Breeze, Witchdoctor, Big Rube, OutKast, GOODie MOb, IMAKEMADBEATS

BANG! @southernvangard radio Ep419! Hey you - yeah I said you - YOU WAAAAALCOME! #SmithsonianGrade #WeAreTheGard // southernvangard.com // @southernvangard on all platforms #hiphop #undergroundhiphop #boombap ---------- Recorded live November 17, 2024 @ Dirty Blanket Studios, Marietta, GA southernvangard.com @southernvangard on all platforms #SmithsonianGrade #WeAreTheGard twitter/IG: @southernvangard @jondoeatl @cappuccinomeeks ---------- Pre-Game Beats - Klim Beats "Southern Vangard Theme" - Bobby Homack & The Southern Vangard All-Stars Talk Break Inst - "Meandher" - CJ The Cynic ** WORLD EXCLUSIVE ** "Black Jack" - Tableek ft. Boogie Fields (prod. Roddy Rod) "Say A Word For Me" - Poe Mack "Deep Cuts" - Brother Ali (prod. Ant) "The Madness" - Stu Bangas & Wordsworth ft. DJ Jon Doe, Breeze Brewin & John Robinson "FIRE" - Psycho Les, Eric Bobo & Stu Bangas ft. Blahzay Blahzay "Live Illustrators" - Machacha ft. Jay Royale, WateRR & DJ FMD Talk Break Inst - "Curtains" - CJ The Cynic ** WORLD EXCLUSIVE ** "Slipping Away" - Spit Gemz "Don't Be Tellin Me" - El Gant & Shyste (prod. Ab The Audicrat) "Double Barrel" - Jamil Honesty x Giallo Point ft. Substance810 & DJ Grazzhoppa "The Counts" - Brother Ali (prod. Ant) "Friends" - Tableek ft. Suadela (prod. Roddy Rod) "Head Strong" - Casual & Albert Jenkins "Cornerstore Shrine" - Codenine x BoneWeso Talk Break Inst - "Cbros" - CJ The Cynic ** WORLD EXCLUSIVE ** "Written In Stone" - Eto, Rick Hyde & Flee Lord (prod. Richard Milli) "Reach Not" - Gravity Propulsion ft. Crimeapple "Art Basel In Spain" - SAM R I & William Bostick ft. Doza The Drum Dealer & Chester "Tan Hue" - Bub Styles & Vinyl Villain ft. Lukah "Burn In Ivory" - Chino XL (prod. Body Bag Ben) "Free Shots" - Westside Gunn ft. Conway The Machine (prod. Conductor Williams & Statik Selektah) "Judas" - Eto (prod. Chup The Producer) "Tesla Test Drive" - Codenine x BoneWeso Talk Break Inst - "NewDr0wn" - CJ The Cynic ** WORLD EXCLUSIVE **

Subscribe Apple | Google | Spotify | Stitcher | iHeart Support The Daily Gardener Buy Me A Coffee  Connect for FREE! The Friday Newsletter |  Daily Gardener Community Botanical History On This Day 1806 William Wordsworth received a life-changing invitation from Lady Margaret Willes Beaumont to design and build a winter garden at her estate in an old gravel quarry. This unique request would lead to what Wordsworth later called "the longest letter I ever wrote in my life" - a detailed garden design that merged poetry with horticulture. 1887 Georgia O'Keeffe was born - an artist who would revolutionize how we see flowers through her bold, modernist vision. Over her remarkable career, O'Keeffe created more than 900 works of art, but it's her dramatic, large-scale flower paintings that have become her most recognizable legacy. Grow That Garden Library™  Read The Daily Gardener review of Around the House and In the Garden by Dominique Browning  Buy the book on Amazon: Around the House and In the Garden by Dominique Browning  Today's Botanic Spark 1985 On this day, a phenomenal piece of botanical history changed hands at Sotheby's auction house: Empress Josephine's personal copy of Pierre-Joseph Redouté's (pee-AIR zho-ZEFF reh-doo-TAY) botanical watercolors for "Les Liliacées" (lay lee-lee-ah-SAY) - "The Lilies." Thanks for listening to The Daily Gardener And remember: For a happy, healthy life, garden every day.

#NILE RIVER VALLEY: All against All. Ronan Wordsworth. @GPFutures undated Suez Canal

Wordsworth was not unusual among Romantic poets for his enthusiastic support of the French Revolution, but he stands apart from his contemporaries for actually being there to see it for himself (‘Thou wert there,' Coleridge wrote). This episode looks at Wordsworth's retrospective account of his 1791 visit to France, described in books 9 and 10 of The Prelude, and the ways in which it reveals a passionate commitment to republicanism while recoiling from political extremism. Mark and Seamus discuss why, despite Wordsworth's claim of being innately republican, discussion of the intellectual underpinnings of the revolution is strangely absent from the poem, which is more often preoccupied with romance and the imagination, particularly in their power to soften zealotry.Non-subscribers will only hear an extract from this episode. To listen to the full episode, and all our other Close Readings series, subscribe:Directly in Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/4dbjbjGIn other podcast apps: lrb.me/closereadingsFurther reading in the LRB:Seamus Perry:https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v30/n24/seamus-perry/regrets-vexations-lassitudesE.P. Thompsonhttps://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v10/n22/e.p.-thompson/wordsworth-s-crisisColin Burrow:https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n13/colin-burrow/a-solemn-and-unsexual-manMarilyn Butlerhttps://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v05/n12/marilyn-butler/three-feet-on-the-groundThomas Keymerhttps://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/n12/thomas-keymer/after-meditation Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kat Wordsworth is passionate about making doubt a more accepted and less feared conversation in Christian culture. She shares her story of messy, doubtful faith on Instagram (@about_doubt) and lives in England with her husband and children.  Kat is the author of Let's Talk About Doubt which you can purchase here: https://a.co/d/6ylZZ6X. ___________________________________________________ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠GO HERE⁠ for ways to work with me (https://paperbell.me/meagan-skidmore) including the "Determine Your Values Guide." Special offer for October 2024: Pay-what-you-can coaching session: https://app.paperbell.com/checkout/packages/103462. Please help the podcast grow by following, leaving a 5 star review on Spotify or Apple podcasts and sharing with friends. Learn more about me at https://⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠meaganskidmorecoaching.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.⁠⁠⁠ Beyond the Shadow of Doubt™ is a proud member of the Dialogue Podcast Network found at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠DialogueJournal.com/podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, part of the Dialogue Journal, founded by Mormon writer, teacher and scholar, Eugene England. Hopeful Spaces, a monthly support group facilitated by Meagan Skidmore Coaching, is a ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dallas Hope Charities⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ component of Hopeful Discussions sponsored by Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA. Send an email to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠chc@dallashopecharities.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to join.

#UKRAINE: Drones take command. Ronan Wordsworth, @GPFutures 1883 Ukraine?

If you're enjoying the Hardcore Literature Show, there are two ways you can show your support and ensure it continues: 1. Please leave a quick review on iTunes. 2. Join in the fun over at the Hardcore Literature Book Club: patreon.com/hardcoreliterature Thank you so much. Happy listening and reading! - Benjamin

The European far right has had one of their best electoral years since the Second World War. What could it mean for European geopolitics, and how does migration play a part? GPF Analyst Ronan Wordsworth joined host Christian Smith from Prague on our recent Podcast+ episode for ClubGPF members to understand the moment and plot what comes next. To learn more about ClubGPF, including more free audio and video clips, visit http://ow.ly/qHIP50JUPW2.

1/2: #WESTERN SAHARA: Francophone Africa and the tangle of  post-colonial anarchy. Ronan Wordsworth, @GPFutures 1770

2/2: #WESTERN SAHARA: Francophone Africa and the tangle of  post-colonial anarchy. Ronan Wordsworth, @GPFutures 1900 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

OCEANIA: defending the Second Island Chain, Ronan Wordsworth, @GPFutures https://geopoliticalfutures.com/the-us-strengthens-the-second-island-chain/ 1943 Northern Territory

PREVIEW: AUSTRALIA: SECOND ISLAND CHAIN: Conversation with colleague Ronan Wordsworth of #GPFutures regarding the fortifying of the Second Island Chain with the Northern Territory of Australia as the anchor -- preparing for the PLA attack on the First Island Chain. More tonight. 1942 Northern Territory at Stokes Hill

2/2: #SUDAN: Warlords and Russia switching sides. Ronan Wordsworth, @GPFutures. https://geopoliticalfutures.com/sudans-forever-war/ UNDATED CROSSING THE RED SEA

1/2: #SUDAN: Warlords and Russia switching sides. Ronan Wordsworth, @GPFutures. https://geopoliticalfutures.com/sudans-forever-war/ 1356 RED SEA

#South Africa: ANC shares power with Democratic Alliance. Ronan Wordsworth.  https://www.ft.com/content/439b5283-876d-411a-95a8-dc28215c776f 1890 Capetown