Podcasts about luce irigaray

"Ten thousand of your children perished in my palm, Your Grace, she thought, slipping a third finger into Myr. Whilst you snored, I would lick your sons off my face and fingers one by one, all those pale sticky princes. You claimed your rights, my lord, but in the darkness I would eat your heirs." Professor of Cerseiology at the University of Lesbos, Rohanne, joins us to do a deep dive about Cersei, queerness, and the importance of complex narratives. Where to find Rohanne: https://x.com/cyrilwoodcock and https://bsky.app/profile/cyrilwoodcock.bsky.social Essays and resources mentioned in the episode: A Most Uncommon Woman: Cersei Lannister's Gender Trouble by Rohanne and Lo the Lynx https://lothelynx.wordpress.com/2021/10/17/a-most-uncommon-woman-cersei-lannisters-gender-trouble/  Rohanne's psychoanalytic analysis of Jaime and Cersei's relationship: https://www.youtube.com/live/vLi47CKhFPA?si=tJL7BpchfyqTXY4Q  Rohanne on Melisandre and PTSD on NotACast: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0VPklta6R9p7JLxVfoRQj1?si=2f98e700206745b6  Scholarly works mentioned in this episode-  The Traffic in Women by Gayle Rubin https://summermeetings2013.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/rubin-traffic.pdf  This Sex Which Is Not One by Luce Irigaray https://www.columbia.edu/itc/architecture/ockman/pdfs/feminism/Irigaray.pdf  Tori Amos being Cersei- https://youtu.be/a9zAE3qL-sU?si=rtxQExndYDxKZDBu and https://youtu.be/tQ9mpu-t-7Y?si=mz83A5W2kXfMA4E6  Rohanne's Cersei playlist https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5Vqe6prPlLf54kdP0iYX2W Music credits: "Spring Thaw" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ---- Eliana's twitter: https://twitter.com/arhythmetric Eliana's reddit account: https://www.reddit.com/user/glass_table_girl Eliana's blog: https://themanyfacedblog.wordpress.com/ Chloe's twitter: https://twitter.com/liesandarbor Chloe's blog: liesandarborgold.com Intro by Anton Langhage

durée : 02:24:59 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit, Albane Penaranda, Mathilde Wagman - Par Monique Veaute - Avec Laurence Beauregard (flûte), Joël Hubaut, Irène Jarsky (la voix de Méduse), Jean-Pierre Vernant, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Joss, Luce Irigaray, Orlan, Catherine Mevel, Meredith Monk, Marie-Noëlle Rio, Sapho, Marie-Berthe Servier, Tamia, Marguerite Fischbach-Veaute, Martine Veaute, l'équipe du SAMU 94 et Louis Amiel - Lectures Claude Degliame, René Farabet, Esther Flatt, Catherine Sellers et Anne Zweiband- Réalisation Yvette Tuchband, Catherine Léritier, Monique Burguière et Danielle Toursière - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé

Abby and Patrick welcome writer, academic, and cruciverbalist Anna Shechtman, author of The Riddles of the Sphinx: Inheriting the Feminist History of the Crossword Puzzle, a book that's part personal memoir, part cultural history, and part meditation on what it means to care about meaning in the first place. In typically overdetermined fashion, the three talk about the complex interweaving of language, sexual difference, and the vicissitudes of our appetites for food, clues, accomplishments, “solutions,” and more. Along the way, they unpack the écriture feminine of Hélène Cixous, Julia Kristeva's idea of the semiotic, Luce Irigaray's critique of phallogocentrism, the writing of Jane Gallop, and more. Whether on paper or otherwise, why do people love to create problems for ourselves, and how does the pleasure of solving any given puzzle relate to our apparently limitless hunger for new ones? How does the latent, overdetermined, and unconscious structure what's manifest on a grid in a newspaper, magazine, or online? What did Lacan mean when he advised young psychoanalysts to “do more crosswords”? And how exactly does a crossword get made, anyway? Plus: plenty of puns, both punishing and pleasurable, frank talk about psychotherapy, and more!Anna's book The Riddles of the Sphinx is available here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-riddles-of-the-sphinx-anna-shechtman/20143426Have you noticed that Freud is back? Got questions about psychoanalysis? Or maybe you've traversed the fantasy and lived to tell the tale? Leave us a voicemail! 484 775-0107 A podcast about psychoanalysis, politics, pop culture, and the ways we suffer now. New episodes on Saturdays. Follow us on social media: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/OrdinaryUnhappiness Twitter: @UnhappinessPod Instagram: @OrdinaryUnhappiness Patreon: patreon.com/OrdinaryUnhappiness Theme song: Formal Chicken - Gnossienne No. 1 https://open.spotify.com/album/2MIIYnbyLqriV3vrpUTxxO Provided by Fruits Music

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. Jones demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School, the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy. Helena Vissing, PsyD, SEP, PMH-C is a Licensed Psychologist practicing in California. She can be reached at contact@helenavissing.com. She is the author of Somatic Maternal Healing: Psychodynamic and Somatic Treatment of Trauma in the Perinatal Period (Routledge, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychoanalysis

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. Jones demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School, the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy. Helena Vissing, PsyD, SEP, PMH-C is a Licensed Psychologist practicing in California. She can be reached at contact@helenavissing.com. She is the author of Somatic Maternal Healing: Psychodynamic and Somatic Treatment of Trauma in the Perinatal Period (Routledge, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. Jones demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School, the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy. Helena Vissing, PsyD, SEP, PMH-C is a Licensed Psychologist practicing in California. She can be reached at contact@helenavissing.com. She is the author of Somatic Maternal Healing: Psychodynamic and Somatic Treatment of Trauma in the Perinatal Period (Routledge, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. Jones demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School, the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy. Helena Vissing, PsyD, SEP, PMH-C is a Licensed Psychologist practicing in California. She can be reached at contact@helenavissing.com. She is the author of Somatic Maternal Healing: Psychodynamic and Somatic Treatment of Trauma in the Perinatal Period (Routledge, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. Jones demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School, the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy. Helena Vissing, PsyD, SEP, PMH-C is a Licensed Psychologist practicing in California. She can be reached at contact@helenavissing.com. She is the author of Somatic Maternal Healing: Psychodynamic and Somatic Treatment of Trauma in the Perinatal Period (Routledge, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. Jones demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School, the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy. Helena Vissing, PsyD, SEP, PMH-C is a Licensed Psychologist practicing in California. She can be reached at contact@helenavissing.com. She is the author of Somatic Maternal Healing: Psychodynamic and Somatic Treatment of Trauma in the Perinatal Period (Routledge, 2023). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/french-studies

Christiane und ich lesen den Anfang von Kapitel 1.4. Judith Butler setzt sich weiter mit Luce Irigaray auseinander und wirft ihr vor, dass ihre These vom Phallogozentrismus selbst eine Imunisierung gegen Kritik ist, da auf jedes Argument dagegen eigenwendet werden kann, dass es aus einer phallogozentristischen Weltsicht stammt. Über diese Frage schweifen wir ab, ob Daniel als Mann überhaupt in einem Podcast über Feminismus sprechen sollte. Wollt ihr mich unterstützen? Dann gebt mir doch einen Kaffee aus! :) https://www.buymeacoffee.com/privatsprache ======= abonniert meinen Podcast ====== Philosophie-Videos: Aristoteles' Kritik an Platons Ideenlehre: https://youtu.be/Hjghct9d8yo?si=rOPYl0fCVfB1L_5E Ethik und Ästhetik in Tár – Kann man die Kunst vom Künstler trennen? https://youtu.be/3oH9G19T04A 10 philosophische Lieblingsbücher: https://youtu.be/LfQ2CksAEB0 Alle Philosophie-Videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhvEH9NjuPs&list=PL1L_CFjFbZ9aRfcEW6avxSgvxr9Q2jBrH Wie das mit der Philosophie angefangen hat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhvEH9NjuPs&t Zur weiteren Recherche über Judith Butler: Judith Butler – Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter: https://amzn.to/3ENUwBW * Lars Distelhorst – Judith Butler https://amzn.to/3H31oho * Riki Wilchins – Gender Theory. Eine Einführung: https://amzn.to/3AZFZSw * Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker über Konrad Lorenz: https://gegneranalyse.de/personen/konrad-lorenz/# Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer über die Entpathologisierung von Homosexualität: https://www.bptk.de/homosexualitaet-und-transgeschlechtlichkeit-sind-keine-krankheiten/ Olaf Hiort über biologisches Geschlecht als Spektrum https://www.spektrum.de/frage/geschlechtsidentitaet-gibt-es-mehr-als-zwei-geschlechter/1835662 Simone de Beauvoir – Das andere Geschlecht: https://amzn.to/3XtAXb3 * Eva Scheufler – Die feministische Philosophie und der Frauenkörper https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/913# Gödels Unvollständigkeitssätze https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/goedels-unvollstaendigkeitssaetze-mathematik-ist-unvollstaendig/2019298 Die BPB zu Humanismus: https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/lexika/das-junge-politik-lexikon/320496/humanismus/ Deutschlandfunk zu Butlers Dekonstruktion des Humanismus: https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/humanismus-einer-dekonstruktivistin-100.html Und Produktive Differenzen zur Frage, warum Butler diese Dekonstruktion vornimmt: https://differenzen.univie.ac.at/glossar.php?sp=26 Wörterbuch der Philosophischen Begriffe https://amzn.to/3Qi5Ygk * Spektrum der Wissenschaft zur Herr-Knecht-Dialektik https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/philosophie/herr-und-knecht/871 *Das ist ein Affiliate-Link: Wenn ihr das Buch kauft, bekomme ich eine winzige Provision und freue mich.

Christiane und ich besprechen weiter das Kapitel "Die Geschlechtsidentität: Zirkel und Scheitern der gegenwärtigen Debatte". Heute geht es unter anderem darum, dass der hegemoniale Diskurs festlegt, was verhandelt werden darf. Wir machen einen Exkurs, dass im Gegensatz zur Gender-Debatte AfD-Thesen als legitime Diskursbeiträge vom hegemonialen Diskurs akzeptiert werden. Wir besprechen Butlers These, dass die Einschränkung, welche Geschlechter denkbar sind, in unsere Sprache eingeschrieben sind. Weiblichkeit erhält demnach immer nur in Relation zu Männlichkeit Bedeutung. Butler bringt Luce Irigaray ins Spiel. Es geht um die Möglichkeit, die Welt mit der Sprache richtig abzubilden. Daniel schweift ab in das Idealsprachen-Projekt der analytischen Philosophie, warum es aufgegeben wurde und die Versuche der Postmoderne, Sprache nicht mehr als Ganzes zu ändern sondern in einzelnen Facetten so zu verbiegen, dass sagbar wird, was zuvor nicht sagbar war. Wollt ihr mich unterstützen? Dann gebt mir doch einen Kaffee aus! :) https://www.buymeacoffee.com/privatsprache Aristoteles – Metaphysik https://youtu.be/OB5viElv5_o Ethik und Ästhetik in Tár – Kann man die Kunst vom Künstler trennen? https://youtu.be/3oH9G19T04A 10 philosophische Lieblingsbücher: https://youtu.be/LfQ2CksAEB0 Alle Philosophie-Videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhvEH9NjuPs&list=PL1L_CFjFbZ9aRfcEW6avxSgvxr9Q2jBrH Wie das mit der Philosophie angefangen hat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhvEH9NjuPs&t Zur weiteren Recherche über Judith Butler: Judith Butler – Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter: https://amzn.to/3ENUwBW * Lars Distelhorst – Judith Butler https://amzn.to/3H31oho * Riki Wilchins – Gender Theory. Eine Einführung: https://amzn.to/3AZFZSw * Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker über Konrad Lorenz: https://gegneranalyse.de/personen/konrad-lorenz/# Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer über die Entpathologisierung von Homosexualität: https://www.bptk.de/homosexualitaet-und-transgeschlechtlichkeit-sind-keine-krankheiten/ Olaf Hiort über biologisches Geschlecht als Spektrum https://www.spektrum.de/frage/geschlechtsidentitaet-gibt-es-mehr-als-zwei-geschlechter/1835662 Simone de Beauvoir – Das andere Geschlecht: https://amzn.to/3XtAXb3 * Eva Scheufler – Die feministische Philosophie und der Frauenkörper https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/913# Gödels Unvollständigkeitssätze https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/goedels-unvollstaendigkeitssaetze-mathematik-ist-unvollstaendig/2019298 *Das ist ein Affiliate-Link: Wenn ihr das Buch kauft, bekomme ich eine winzige Provision und freue mich.

Dans cet épisode, Laura Bisaillon, membre du CREFO, rencontre Nilgün Tutal, professeure titulaire à la faculté de Communication de l'Université Galatasaray à Istanbul en Turquie.Madame Nilgün Tutal est professeure titulaire à la faculté de Communication de l'Université Galatasaray à Istanbul en Turquie. Ses recherches portent sur l'orientalisme, le discours médiatique, la construction identitaire, la visualisation de l'information, et l'altérité. Elle est l'auteure de plusieurs livres, dont des traductions du français au turc  des œuvres d'André Gorz, Luce Irigaray, Julia Kristeva et Philippe Sollers. Elle détient un doctorat en Sciences de la communication et de l'information de l'Université Robert Schuman à Strasbourg en France pour la thèse « La Turquie au miroir de la presse française nationale et régionale » et son livre du même titre a paru en 2007.

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/language

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/systems-and-cybernetics

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/communications

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan traces the shared intellectual and political history of computer scientists, cyberneticists, anthropologists, linguists, and theorists across the humanities as they developed a communication and computational-based theory that grasped culture and society in terms of codes. In Code: From Information Theory to French Theory (Duke UP, 2023), Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/french-studies

Philosophy scholar and author Willow Verkerk sits down with Am Johal to discuss Nietzsche and his ideas of friendship, as well as her current work on the Gendered Mimesis project at KU Leuven. Willow compares Nietzsche's more agonistic notion of friendship with other philosophers like Aristotle, Kant, Derrida – and draws from Luce Irigaray to consider friendship from a more gendered lens. Willow also speaks about her creative writing in the past as a form of expression, and discusses her current work on Gendered Mimesis Project, from which she is looking to trace the genealogies of gendered-being by drawing from Adriana Cavarero, Judith Butler, and Catherine Malabou. Full episode details: https://www.sfu.ca/vancity-office-community-engagement/below-the-radar-podcast/episodes/189-willow-verkerk.html Read the transcript: https://www.sfu.ca/vancity-office-community-engagement/below-the-radar-podcast/transcripts/189-willow-verkerk.html Resources: Willow Verkerk: https://philosophy.ubc.ca/profile/willow-verkerk/ Nietzsche and Friendship: https://www.bloomsbury.com/ca/nietzsche-and-friendship-9781350047341/ Gendered Mimesis project: http://www.homomimeticus.eu/gendered-mimesis-c1/ Willow Verkerk at KU Leuven: https://hiw.kuleuven.be/hua/about/staff-hua/00060614 Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/555192/thus-spoke-zarathustra-by-friedrich-nietzsche-translated-with-a-preface-by-walter-kaufmann/9780140047486 Bio: Willow Verkerk is a Vancouver based scholar and author who has taught philosophy both within and outside of the academy in Europe, the UK, and Canada. She has published numerous academic essays on friendship, feminist activism, and gender identity and is the author of Nietzsche and Friendship. Willow is also an author of short fiction published in literary magazines in Canada and Europe. Her current research is concerned with providing a new account of the human subject through the philosophical concept of mimesis. Dr. Verkerk is frequently invited to speak about her research at universities and art institutions. She is passionate about communicating to diverse audiences the thinking of the three masters of suspicion- Nietzsche, Marx, and Freud- alongside a feminist politics that illuminates the importance of philosophical honesty. Willow brings philosophical frames of meaning from the foundations and legacies of critical theory to contemporary issues in both private and public life. In doing so, she connects thinkers in the history of philosophy to political and ethical studies that reflect upon the axes of oppression that are relevant today. Cite this episode: Chicago Style Johal, Am. “Nietzsche and Friendship — with Willow Verkerk.” Below the Radar, SFU's Vancity Office of Community Engagement. Podcast audio, October 11, 2022. https://www.sfu.ca/vancity-office-community-engagement/below-the-radar-podcast/episodes/189-willow-verkerk.html.

How can we make a better future for the future generations where more people are included no matter their gender, sexuality, age, etc? In this episode of season 2 of The Darker Sides of Life Kamilla is answering this question sent in by a listener. This episode is a bit different than the usual ones since Kamilla is using her academic background as a published writer on feminist issues in Denmark and her field in intellectual history, religion studies and Hebrew, and feminist matters overall to answer this question. GET YOUR TICKET TO THE LIVE SESSION ON NOV 4 HERE: www.hexekami.com/shopLike this podcast? Share it with your friends, subscribe and let me know!Get your grief diary here: www.hexekami.com/shop (Use code DARKSIDES for 10% off)Book a 1:1 session with me by either sending me a DM on Instagram or send me an email to mail@hexekami.comFollow the official podcast Instagram: @thedarkersidesoflifeWant to donate and support me? Here is my Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/thedarkersidesoflifeMail me: TheDarkerSidesOfLife@gmail.comThank you so much!Medical Disclaimer: I am not a healthcare professional. This podcast is created to share experiences from one human to others. This podcast cannot replace any medication or professional treatment. If you have any mental health conditions please consult your health-care provider.Music: ItsWatrSupport the show

Emma Heaney talks about the social organization of the supposedly biologically derived terms of the sex binary into a hierarchy of persons and qualities. She speaks widely about the work that she and her colleagues are doing, drawing on a tradition of scholarship that includes the work of Luce Irigaray, Hortense Spillers, Cathy J. Cohen and others. Emma Heaney is a teacher, researcher, and writer living in Queens. Her first book, a study of the medicalization of trans femininity and the uptake of the diagnostic figure in works of twentieth-century literature and philosophy, is The New Woman: Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory (Northwestern, 2017). Her forthcoming second book, Feminism Against Cisness, is an edited collection of essays by Trans Studies scholars who use anti-colonial, Black, and Marxist feminist methods to address the many legacies of the historical emergence of the idea that assigned sex determines sexed experience. Her introduction for that collection, entitled “Sexual Difference Without Cisness” provides the basis for this interview. Image: © 2021 Saronik Bosu Music used in promotional material: “Flow” by dustmotes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Emma Heaney talks about the social organization of the supposedly biologically derived terms of the sex binary into a hierarchy of persons and qualities. She speaks widely about the work that she and her colleagues are doing, drawing on a tradition of scholarship that includes the work of Luce Irigaray, Hortense Spillers, Cathy J. Cohen and others. Emma Heaney is a teacher, researcher, and writer living in Queens. Her first book, a study of the medicalization of trans femininity and the uptake of the diagnostic figure in works of twentieth-century literature and philosophy, is The New Woman: Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory (Northwestern, 2017). Her forthcoming second book, Feminism Against Cisness, is an edited collection of essays by Trans Studies scholars who use anti-colonial, Black, and Marxist feminist methods to address the many legacies of the historical emergence of the idea that assigned sex determines sexed experience. Her introduction for that collection, entitled “Sexual Difference Without Cisness” provides the basis for this interview. Image: © 2021 Saronik Bosu Music used in promotional material: “Flow” by dustmotes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Emma Heaney talks about the social organization of the supposedly biologically derived terms of the sex binary into a hierarchy of persons and qualities. She speaks widely about the work that she and her colleagues are doing, drawing on a tradition of scholarship that includes the work of Luce Irigaray, Hortense Spillers, Cathy J. Cohen and others. Emma Heaney is a teacher, researcher, and writer living in Queens. Her first book, a study of the medicalization of trans femininity and the uptake of the diagnostic figure in works of twentieth-century literature and philosophy, is The New Woman: Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory (Northwestern, 2017). Her forthcoming second book, Feminism Against Cisness, is an edited collection of essays by Trans Studies scholars who use anti-colonial, Black, and Marxist feminist methods to address the many legacies of the historical emergence of the idea that assigned sex determines sexed experience. Her introduction for that collection, entitled “Sexual Difference Without Cisness” provides the basis for this interview. Image: © 2021 Saronik Bosu Music used in promotional material: “Flow” by dustmotes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

Emma Heaney talks about the social organization of the supposedly biologically derived terms of the sex binary into a hierarchy of persons and qualities. She speaks widely about the work that she and her colleagues are doing, drawing on a tradition of scholarship that includes the work of Luce Irigaray, Hortense Spillers, Cathy J. Cohen and others. Emma Heaney is a teacher, researcher, and writer living in Queens. Her first book, a study of the medicalization of trans femininity and the uptake of the diagnostic figure in works of twentieth-century literature and philosophy, is The New Woman: Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory (Northwestern, 2017). Her forthcoming second book, Feminism Against Cisness, is an edited collection of essays by Trans Studies scholars who use anti-colonial, Black, and Marxist feminist methods to address the many legacies of the historical emergence of the idea that assigned sex determines sexed experience. Her introduction for that collection, entitled “Sexual Difference Without Cisness” provides the basis for this interview. Image: © 2021 Saronik Bosu Music used in promotional material: “Flow” by dustmotes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

Emma Heaney talks about the social organization of the supposedly biologically derived terms of the sex binary into a hierarchy of persons and qualities. She speaks widely about the work that she and her colleagues are doing, drawing on a tradition of scholarship that includes the work of Luce Irigaray, Hortense Spillers, Cathy J. Cohen and others. Emma Heaney is a teacher, researcher, and writer living in Queens. Her first book, a study of the medicalization of trans femininity and the uptake of the diagnostic figure in works of twentieth-century literature and philosophy, is The New Woman: Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory (Northwestern, 2017). Her forthcoming second book, Feminism Against Cisness, is an edited collection of essays by Trans Studies scholars who use anti-colonial, Black, and Marxist feminist methods to address the many legacies of the historical emergence of the idea that assigned sex determines sexed experience. Her introduction for that collection, entitled “Sexual Difference Without Cisness” provides the basis for this interview. Image: © 2021 Saronik Bosu Music used in promotional material: “Flow” by dustmotes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/lgbtq-studies

Julia ter Veld - Feys beste vriendin Fey mag vandaag niet op een verjaardag komen. Waarom? dat snapt ze niet. De herinneringen tussen haar en de jarige hebben haar beeld van 'de ideale vrouw' bepaald. De afwijzing voelt naast een persoonlijke steek ook als een universelere afwijzing van dat 'vrouwzijn'. Resultaat: een woedende en strijdvaardige Fey, die toevallig heel lang haar adem in kan houden. Een poëtisch verslag van een jaloerse, radicaliserende puber die obsessief en ook destructief strijdt voor haar vrijheid. Geïnspireerd op Luce Irigaray's 'Amant Marine' (1991), vertaald door Gillian C. Gill Oorzaken Podcast Academy is een opleiding georganiseerd door het Audiofestival Oorzaken en gefinancierd door het NPO-fonds.

Ok, it's the last cast of the year, you all know the drill, I'm not sure I can be bothered this week so I'm just going to phone this one in if that's ok with the rest of you? Right, so welcome, it's Danny and Mike, listen to us talk about stuff. Sit in amazed silence as this happens, then that, then some other stuff, possibly about social construction, possibly about Luce Irigaray, to be honest I can't rightly remember, we are just on the other side of Christmas here, cut us some slack for pity sake. I think Danny mentions menstruation and hysteria - one of us says something meaningful about gender… yeah, pretty sure that was this cast. All this plus what, exactly, does it mean to be “non-binary”? Don't look at us, how should we know? But, as luck would have it we have with us Sorren, the non-binary archeologist, who was prepared to share her own experiences with us for the promise of a free meal. Who are we to turn down such an offer in these difficult times?

Falls euch cogitamus gefällt, lasst bitte ein Abo da und/oder empfehlt uns weiter. Ihr könnt gerne bei YouTube in den Kommentaren oder über cogitamus@posteo.de mit uns diskutieren. Für neue Gedanken sind wir immer offen. Ihr dürft uns gerne bei YouTube abonnieren: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2YdZ5ryFQ32Zd75m2AW5cw Unterstützen könnt ihr uns ebenfalls: paypal.me/cogitamus oder cogitamus@posteo.de. Nachdem die letzte Folge über Christine Korsgaard so gut angekommen ist (Verweis auf Special #7), stelle ich euch eine weitere weniger bekannte Philosophin vor. Heute im Programm: Luce Irigaray. Basierend auf Derridas Dekonstruktion (Verweis auf #10.1) entwickelt sie die Theorie des Phallogozentrismus nach der Frauen in der männlich konstruierten Sprache radikal ausgeschlossen und nicht repräsentiert werden. Damit bereitet sie eine Grundlage für die Theorie von Judith Butler (ebenfalls Verweis auf #10.1), die sich im Unbehagen der Geschlechter intensiv mit Luce Irigaray auseinandersetzt. Die weiterführende Theorie der sexuellen Differenz weist jedoch einige Probleme auf. Timemarker 00:00 Intro 02:31 Biographie 05:46 Phallogozentrismus 15:10 Sexuelle Differenz 18:55 Kritik und Zusammenfassung Literatur/Links/Quellen Zu ihrer „Biographie“: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Luce-Irigaray Weitere Infos (auch zur Biographie): https://workingwithluceirigaray.com/ Anfangszitat: Luce Irigaray – Zur Geschlechterdifferenz Regine Munz – Philosophinnen des 20. Jahrhunderts Judith Butler – Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter (insbesondere S. 28f.) Susan Arndt – Sexismus (S. 267) Bild: https://bluestockingsmag.com/2015/02/13/a-very-brief-introduction-to-luce-irigaray/

durée : 02:24:59 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit, Albane Penaranda, Mathilde Wagman - Par Monique Veaute - Avec Laurence Beauregard (flûte), Joël Hubaut, Irène Jarsky (la voix de Méduse), Jean-Pierre Vernant, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Joss, Luce Irigaray, Orlan, Catherine Mevel, Meredith Monk, Marie-Noëlle Rio, Sapho, Marie-Berthe Servier, Tamia, Marguerite Fischbach-Veaute, Martine Veaute, l'équipe du SAMU 94 et Louis Amiel - Lectures Claude Degliame, René Farabet, Esther Flatt, Catherine Sellers et Anne Zweiband- Réalisation Yvette Tuchband, Catherine Léritier, Monique Burguière et Danielle Toursière - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé

Fuente: Binetti, M. (2015). La diferencia ontológica de la "Madre-matriz-materia" en la superación de la diferencia sexual. Una lectura de Luce Irigaray. Revista Clepsydra, 14, 9-24. Disponible en https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/915/6515/CL_14_%282015%29_01.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Emma Heaney talks about the social organization of the supposedly biologically derived terms of the sex binary into a hierarchy of persons and qualities. She speaks widely about the work that she and her colleagues are doing, drawing on a tradition of scholarship that includes the work of Luce Irigaray, Hortense Spillers, Cathy J. Cohen […]

La formazione psicoanalitica e la pratica yoga sono per Luce Irigaray il punto di partenza per una riflessione sul dolore e sul modo di coltivare un'energia naturale. Psicoanalisi e yoga possono aiutare là dove la medicina tradizionale non riesce. In particolare, lo yoga può supportare una persona che soffre attraverso una pratica che ristora l'energia. “Oggi molti discorsi politici ed economici alludono all'esaurimento delle risorse naturali, ma non si parla quasi mai delle riserve naturali dell'essere umano stesso. Sarebbe auspicabile preoccuparsi prima di queste – soprattutto per quanto riguarda l'ambiente, l'alimentazione e la differenza tra i sessi – per costruire un futuro più pacifico e più felice. Coniugare la cultura del respiro a quella dell'amore significa creare un ponte tra Oriente e Occidente, senza alcuna sudditanza culturale”.

We discuss: what we have done right and what we have done wrong in our careers, creating her own biennale, gentrification, artist salaries, Artist fees, collaborative artmaking, and Feminism.   People + places mentioned: Staðir / Places Biennale - https://stadir.is The Book of Icelanders - Íslendingabók - https://www.islendingabok.is A-DASH - https://a-dash.space Snehta residency - https://www.snehtaresidency.org Noemi Niederhauser - http://www.noemi-niederhauser.ch Catriona Gallagher - https://www.catrionargallagher.com Zoe Hatziyannaki - https://zoehatziyannaki.com We Make it - https://wemakeit.com Myndlistarsjóður (the culture fund of Iceland) - https://myndlistarsjodur.is Ltd Ink Corporation - https://ltdinkcorporation.com     3 Creative People she is looking at: Luce Irigaray - https://iep.utm.edu/irigaray/ Olivia Laing - https://www.olivialaing.com John Gray - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gray_(philosopher) Richard Artschwager - https://whitney.org/exhibitions/richard-artschwager     https://evaisleifs.info     Audio editing by Jakub Černý Music by Peat Biby   Hosted by Matthew Dols http://www.matthewdols.com     Supported in part by: EEA Grants from Iceland, Liechtenstein + Norway https://eeagrants.org             and we appreciate the assistance of our partners in this project: Hunt Kastner - https://huntkastner.com Kunstsentrene i Norge - https://www.kunstsentrene.no            

We discuss: what we have done right and what we have done wrong in our careers, creating her own biennale, gentrification, artist salaries, Artist fees, collaborative artmaking, and Feminism.   People + places mentioned: Staðir / Places Biennale - https://stadir.is The Book of Icelanders - Íslendingabók - https://www.islendingabok.is A-DASH - https://a-dash.space Snehta residency - https://www.snehtaresidency.org Noemi Niederhauser - http://www.noemi-niederhauser.ch Catriona Gallagher - https://www.catrionargallagher.com Zoe Hatziyannaki - https://zoehatziyannaki.com We Make it - https://wemakeit.com Myndlistarsjóður (the culture fund of Iceland) - https://myndlistarsjodur.is Ltd Ink Corporation - https://ltdinkcorporation.com   3 Creative People she is looking at: Luce Irigaray - https://iep.utm.edu/irigaray/ Olivia Laing - https://www.olivialaing.com John Gray - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gray_(philosopher) Richard Artschwager - https://whitney.org/exhibitions/richard-artschwager   https://evaisleifs.info   Hosted by Matthew Dols http://matthewdols.com Supported in part by: EEA Grants from Iceland, Liechtenstein + Norway https://eeagrants.org and we appreciate the assistance of our partners in this project: Hunt Kastner – https://huntkastner.com Kunstsentrene i Norge – https://www.kunstsentrene.no   Transcript available: http://wisefoolpod.com/transcript-for-episode-179-sculptor-collaborative-artist-eva-isleifs-reykjavik-iceland/

Docentka filozofie Zuzana Kiczková stála pri zrode Centra rodových štúdií na Filozofickej Fakulte UK v Bratislave a patrí k najvýznamnejším postavám feministickej teórie, rodových štúdií a filozofie na Slovensku. V dnešnom rozhovore rozoberá prelomové dielo feministickej literatúry "Druhé pohlavie" francúzskej spisovateľky a filozofky Simone de Beauvoir. Kiczková ho dáva do kontextu s myšlienkami moderných feministiek ako sú Judith Butler alebo Luce Irigaray, vysvetľuje pojmy pohlavie a rod a objasňuje aj to, že ženu nedefinuje iba jej biologická schopnosť byť matkou.

Abécéd'Air et de Feu - V de Vulve Une chronique sonore d'Anne Mulpas - poème 9. Une lettre > un mot et le voyage commence, l'imaginaire se déplie, combine intime, social et politique, récit vrai et fictif, le quotidien et l'utopie au creux du poétique. Merci à la comédienne et sororale Bénédicte Lesenne qui, prêtant sa voix, porte celles de l'autrice Monique Wittig, des l'historienne Eliane Viennot et de la philosophe Sarah Kofmann en même temps qu'elle endosse les propos de l'abbé de Cluny, Baudelaire et de Furetière. Merci à celles qui ont nourri la réflexion et peuplent les chairs de ce texte : ...Alice Coffin, Catherine Malabou, Chloé Deleaume, Luce Irigaray, Claudine Sagaert, Eliane Viennot, Judith Bernard, Carla Lonzi, Gina Pane, Catherine Breillat, Agnès Varda, Lise Wajeman, Liv Strömquist, les lesbiens de Vaucvulve... — et surtout Karin Bernfeld qui a fait naître cette neuvième lettre. • L'enfant-moi qu'elle est toujours raboule dans le texte telle la Fantine de Hugo avec son précieux petit bout de miroir. En vrai, c'est un vieux poudrier de la grande sœur dont elle a royalement hérité. Le sujet la taraude, la titille. Elle ne sait pas comment ça se nomme cet « endroit-là » — la Mère n'en parle jamais, elle demande simplement, au sortir de la salle de bain, si elle s'est bien lavée « partout ». Dans la voix de la Mère, l'enfant-moi sent que même lavé, frotté, rincé, réside toujours quelque chose de sale. Partout = nulle part. Alors que sait-elle, l'enfant-moi ? 1­ — qu'elle n'a pas de zizi 2 — qu'elle a « à la place de » des lèvres, c'est ce que lui a dit sa copine Christelle, fière d'expliquer au fond de la cour de récré que « nous les filles, on a une « bouchedubas » (en un mot) et donc des lèvres qui cachent un trou comme un gosier. Est-ce que ça parle ? On n'en sait rien.

From sensory experience to emotions, from the crossing over of tactility and aurality to the crossing over of love and grief. This itinerary is explored through lonely train journeys that encounter Susan Sontag’s 'In America', Pablo Picasso’s 'Science and Charity'; Connie Palmen’s 'Logbook of a Merciless Year', Nick Cave’s Skeleton Tree Live Tour and the philosophy of tactility of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Luce Irigaray. It all begins with taking the pulse: listen to your heartbeat by placing two fingers on your wrist. Sylvia Solakidi is a PhD researcher at the Centre for Performance Philosophy, University of Surrey. She writes about experiences of time with the help of theatre and music performances, visual arts and literature, as well as through the writings of phenomenologists, anthropologists and performance scholars; she never forgets her experiences from Greek medical laboratories, where she used to work as a Biologist.

What is the relationship between time and sexual difference? Are the categories of linearity and circularity that have so dominated conceptions of time sufficient for the emancipatory aims of feminist theory and praxis? In Revolutionary Time: On Time and Difference in Kristeva and Irigaray (SUNY Press, 2019), Fanny Söderbäck engages the work of Julia Kristeva and Luce Irigaray to argue that neither linear nor circular models of time make change possible. Only through returning to and revitalizing the past can we enliven the present in ways that make a new future possible. Time and sexual difference, she argues, must be thought together. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What is the relationship between time and sexual difference? Are the categories of linearity and circularity that have so dominated conceptions of time sufficient for the emancipatory aims of feminist theory and praxis? In Revolutionary Time: On Time and Difference in Kristeva and Irigaray (SUNY Press, 2019), Fanny Söderbäck engages the work of Julia Kristeva and Luce Irigaray to argue that neither linear nor circular models of time make change possible. Only through returning to and revitalizing the past can we enliven the present in ways that make a new future possible. Time and sexual difference, she argues, must be thought together. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm

What is the relationship between time and sexual difference? Are the categories of linearity and circularity that have so dominated conceptions of time sufficient for the emancipatory aims of feminist theory and praxis? In Revolutionary Time: On Time and Difference in Kristeva and Irigaray (SUNY Press, 2019), Fanny Söderbäck engages the work of Julia Kristeva and Luce Irigaray to argue that neither linear nor circular models of time make change possible. Only through returning to and revitalizing the past can we enliven the present in ways that make a new future possible. Time and sexual difference, she argues, must be thought together. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What is the relationship between time and sexual difference? Are the categories of linearity and circularity that have so dominated conceptions of time sufficient for the emancipatory aims of feminist theory and praxis? In Revolutionary Time: On Time and Difference in Kristeva and Irigaray (SUNY Press, 2019), Fanny Söderbäck engages the work of Julia Kristeva and Luce Irigaray to argue that neither linear nor circular models of time make change possible. Only through returning to and revitalizing the past can we enliven the present in ways that make a new future possible. Time and sexual difference, she argues, must be thought together. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dr. Helene Russell is an Associate Professor of Theology at Christian Theological Seminary in Indianapolis. Russell has published the book The Pluralism Within: a Reconstruction of Theological Anthropology based on Soren Kierkegaard and Luce Irigaray and edited Creating Women's Theology: A Movement Engaging Process Thought. She has also co-edited Augustine and Kierkegaard, with Kim Paffenroth. On top of being a super scholar, Helene is a friend. When you hear this you will probably want to hang with her too. This episode is sponsored by a brand new podcast from Christian Theological Seminary Follow the podcast, drop a review, send feedback/questions or become a member of the HBC Community. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dr. Helene Russell is an Associate Professor of Theology at Christian Theological Seminary in Indianapolis. Russell has published the book The Pluralism Within: a Reconstruction of Theological Anthropology based on Soren Kierkegaard and Luce Irigaray and edited Creating Women’s Theology: A Movement Engaging Process Thought. She has also co-edited Augustine and Kierkegaard, with Kim Paffenroth. On top of… Read more about Helene Russell: Trauma Sensitive Theology

节目摘要 值此周年纪念日之际，聊一聊我们对爱情的看法。 节目备注 订阅听友通讯请点击这里。 欢迎通过微博关注我们的节目@不丧Podcast和女主播@constancy好小气。 关于线上读书微信群：由于目前群人数超过100人，无法继续通过扫码入群。想要入群的朋友可以先加我的微信号（ID: hongming_qiao），然后再拉你入群。 我们的电报(Telegram)听友群：不丧电报群 我们播客的邮箱地址：busangpodcast@gmail.com 这集播客中提到的相关作品的介绍和链接： 支持我们 梁文道·八分，244.如何看待生命的成熟 Luce Irigaray, Democracy Begins Between Two 不丧，聊一聊《普通人》和我们的恋爱故事 如何收听「不丧」 任何设备都可以通过访问「不丧」的网站在线收听 我们推荐使用泛用型播客客户端收听「不丧」 泛用型播客客户端直接通过播客上传者提供的RSS向用户提供播客内容和信息，不会有第三方的干涉；并且只要上传者更新了Feed，就能在客户端上收听到节目。 iOS平台上我们推荐使用Podcast（苹果预装播客客户端），Castro，Overcast和Pocket Casts。 Android平台上收听方式可以参照这里。 macOS和Windows平台可以通过iTunes收听。 现在你也已经可以在小宇宙、Spotify和Google Podcast平台上收听我们的节目。

节目摘要 值此周年纪念日之际，聊一聊我们对爱情的看法。 节目备注 订阅听友通讯请点击这里。 欢迎通过微博关注我们的节目@不丧Podcast和女主播@constancy好小气。 关于线上读书微信群：由于目前群人数超过100人，无法继续通过扫码入群。想要入群的朋友可以先加我的微信号（ID: hongming_qiao），然后再拉你入群。 我们的电报(Telegram)听友群：不丧电报群 我们播客的邮箱地址：busangpodcast@gmail.com 这集播客中提到的相关作品的介绍和链接： 支持我们 梁文道·八分，244.如何看待生命的成熟 Luce Irigaray, Democracy Begins Between Two 不丧，聊一聊《普通人》和我们的恋爱故事 如何收听「不丧」 任何设备都可以通过访问「不丧」的网站在线收听 我们推荐使用泛用型播客客户端收听「不丧」 泛用型播客客户端直接通过播客上传者提供的RSS向用户提供播客内容和信息，不会有第三方的干涉；并且只要上传者更新了Feed，就能在客户端上收听到节目。 iOS平台上我们推荐使用Podcast（苹果预装播客客户端），Castro，Overcast和Pocket Casts。 Android平台上收听方式可以参照这里。 macOS和Windows平台可以通过iTunes收听。 现在你也已经可以在小宇宙、Spotify和Google Podcast平台上收听我们的节目。

节目摘要 值此周年纪念日之际，聊一聊我们对爱情的看法。 节目备注 订阅听友通讯请点击这里。 欢迎通过微博关注我们的节目@不丧Podcast和女主播@constancy好小气。 关于线上读书微信群：由于目前群人数超过100人，无法继续通过扫码入群。想要入群的朋友可以先加我的微信号（ID: hongming_qiao），然后再拉你入群。 我们的电报(Telegram)听友群：不丧电报群 我们播客的邮箱地址：busangpodcast@gmail.com 这集播客中提到的相关作品的介绍和链接： 支持我们 梁文道·八分，244.如何看待生命的成熟 Luce Irigaray, Democracy Begins Between Two 不丧，聊一聊《普通人》和我们的恋爱故事 如何收听「不丧」 任何设备都可以通过访问「不丧」的网站在线收听 我们推荐使用泛用型播客客户端收听「不丧」 泛用型播客客户端直接通过播客上传者提供的RSS向用户提供播客内容和信息，不会有第三方的干涉；并且只要上传者更新了Feed，就能在客户端上收听到节目。 iOS平台上我们推荐使用Podcast（苹果预装播客客户端），Castro，Overcast和Pocket Casts。 Android平台上收听方式可以参照这里。 macOS和Windows平台可以通过iTunes收听。 现在你也已经可以在小宇宙、Spotify和Google Podcast平台上收听我们的节目。

“Si continuamos hablándonos el mismo lenguaje, vamos a reproducir la misma historia. A comenzar de nuevo las mismas historias. ¿Tú no lo notas? Si continuamos hablando lo mismo, si nos hablamos como se hablan los hombres desde hace siglos, como nos han enseñado a hablar, nos echaremos de menos. Otra vez…” Luce Irigaray, una de las clásicas citadas en este tercer volumen de Antígonas, con el que despedimos la primera temporada de Limbo. Gracias totales a nuestras escuchas, a las diversas comunidades que han contribuido a lo largo de estos ocho meses y 21 programas. Hasta la próxima…

“Rubriche d'aria” è a cura di Juan Pablo Macías e Alessandra Poggianti ed è uno dei canali di "On Air", il nuovo progetto dell'associazione Carico Massimo, dedicato all'aria. Nella prima puntata Federica Giardini parla di ecologia e ambiente.Federica Giardini inaugura «Rubriche d'aria» con una argomentazione che, da “L'oblio dell'aria” di Luce Irigaray, arriva alla privatizzazione dell'aria. Da lì, alla correlazione tra livello di particolato dell'aria con il tasso di diffusione del virus, il passo è breve.“Invento qui il termine atmomensori sul calco degli agrimensori di Luce Irigaray, con cui mi sono formata, dal film « Les arpenteurs » di Michel Soutter. La farsa (la « Merda d'artista » in scatola di Manzoni) diventa tragedia: l'aria pura in vendita, la racconta Marco D'Eramo in « Dominio ». Sui carbon credits e altre invenzioni per fare profitto dall'impensabile, ho scritto di recente. Note sulla formazione del valore.” Federica Giardini Federica Giaridni, dopo la laurea in Filosofia all'Università di Pisa, ha lavorato sul rapporto tra filosofia e psicoanalisi. Ha quindi approfondito la dimensione corporea dell'intersoggettività all'incrocio tra fenomenologia e filosofia della differenza. Le ricerche più recenti utilizzano la differenza come operatore per affrontare alcuni temi portanti della filosofia politica, dalle relazioni di obbedienza/disobbedienza all'estensione dell'ambito politico all'ordine delle relazioni tra umano e non umano.

Paula Gruman, psicóloga clínica e doutoranda em Psicanálise pela Université de Paris, introduz nesse vídeo o pensamento da filósofa, psicanalista e linguista belga, Luce Irigaray. Irigaray se destacou por analisar o pensamento ocidental usando o método psicanalítico, chegando à conclusão que as mulheres não se encontram verdadeiramente representadas na Linguagem, no sistema Simbólico e tampouco no Imaginário. Para a pensadora, essa falta de representação implica uma exclusão e dificulta que as mulheres sejam vistas como sujeitos. Apesar de Irigaray manter-se ancorada a uma cis-heteronorma (o que podemos buscar desconstruir hoje), acredita-se que a proposta geral de seu pensamento segue sendo pertinente hoje em dia, em nossa sociedade ainda patriarcal e falocêntrica. Irigaray acredita que uma mudança (social, econômica, “concreta”) em direção a direitos e representação iguais para os dois sexos passa necessariamente por uma mudança no pensamento ocidental (seu simbólico, seu imaginário e, notadamente, sua linguagem). Seu pensamento influenciou muito a obra de Judith Butler no que tange ao gênero.  Redes sociais e Contatos   Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3203682725013358 Instagram: @psicanalise.feminista  E-mail: paulagruman@gmail.com Rede Brasileira de Mulheres Filósofas https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJW1f-7pafYDHJSBRpJZI0g  https://instagram.com/filosofas.brasil?igshid=19ebcoardr1xj  https://www.facebook.com/filosofas.org  Laboratório Tempo do Agora (UFRJ) Instagram: @tempodoagora Facebook, Youtube:  https://instagram.com/tempodoagora?igshid=uwkxicltf6vp  Tempo do Agora Site: www.tenpodoagora.org Link: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1143911264606246

En 1996, éclate l’affaire Sokal: Alan Sokal, un mathématicien et physicien américain publie un texte intitulé : Transgressing the Boundaries : Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity(1), dans la revue américaine Social Text(2). Hélas! Sokal avoue que ce qui est écrit est pur non-sens: il cherchait en fait à montrer l’irrationalité qui, selon lui, vit au coeur de certains cercles académiques américains. En 1997, Sokal et son collègue physicien et philosophe des sciences, Jean Bricmont, publient ensemble le livre Les Impostures Intellectuelles3,4. Dans ce dernier, les auteurs critiquent vivement Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, Luce Irigaray, Bruno Latour, Jean Baudrillard, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari et Paul Virilio, penseurs plus ou moins éminents en philosophie, littérature et sciences humaines, que l’on pourrait qualifiés de “postmodernes”.Nous, Eliot et Justin, adresserons certaines de ces critiques et discuterons ensemble de science et de rationalité. Nous ne pouvions nous empêcher de rire parfois! ENVOYEZ-NOUS VOS QUESTIONS, COMMENTAIRES, SUGGESTIONSYoutube: Dialogues Dilettantes (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7IL0WJ1TAkUsNTfl3YUxQQ?view_as=subscriber)ERRATUMRien iciPOUR POUSSER VOS LECTURESKuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962. Le texte de Kuhn est un incontournable en philo des sciences du XXè siècle. Très bon livre qui remet en question plusieurs acquis de la philo des sciences mais qui aussi, malheureusement selon Eliot et Justin, a ouvert la porte à plusieurs courants relativistes en science.Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1934 (en allemand; Popper le réécrit en anglais en 1959). Texte classique qui renverse le positivisme logique et qui est abordé brièvement par Sokal et Bricmont. Popper est un amoureux de la rationalité et est très critique envers toute forme de relativisme. Feyerabend, Against Method, 1975. Anarchisme épistémologique. Feyerabend tente de montrer qu’il n’y a aucune méthode infaillible en science et, qu’ainsi, toutes les méthodes se valent (“Anything goes”). Il est critiqué par Sokal et Bricmont.Duhem, La théorie physique: son objet et sa structure, 1906. Première présentation d’une thèse dite de holisme épistémologique. Quine reprend plus tard cette pensée (quoique différement) et aujourd’hui nous nommons cette thèse celle de Duhem-Quine. Sokal et Bricmont l’aborde aussi.Hume, An Enquiry Into Human Understanding, 1748. Un livre classique moderne de scepticisme métaphysique. Entre autres, Hume montre que la méthode dite d’induction en science ainsi que le principe de causalité sont des postulats métaphysiques qui demeureront à jamais non-prouvables. C’est aussi un texte fondateur de l’empirisme moderne. Son influence est énorme même aujourd’hui. NOTES1Transgressing the Boundaries : Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity https://physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html 2https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Text3Alan Sokal et Jean Bricmont, Les Impostures Intellectuelles, Odile Jacob, 1997, 276p.4https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostures_intellectuelles

Feminist philosopher and expert dog walker, Elizah Huff, joins the podcast to discuss the nuances of the marginalized encompassed by the intersectionality movement. Elizah Huff holds an undergraduate degree in Gender Studies and Marketing from Young Harris College, and she has conducted in-depth research on intersectionality and feminism. The critical thinkers and theorist discussed in this podcast are as follows: Ayn Rand, Frantz Fanon, Friedrich Nietzsche, Gayatri Spivak, Harold Garfinkel, Homi Bhabha, Irving Goffman, Isaac Asimov, Jean Paul Sartre, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Jonathan Dancy, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, Kurt Vonnegut, Luce Irigaray, Michel Foucault, Peter Singer and Simone de Beauvoir.

They say that faith is heard, not seen. Indeed there is something provocative about the spoken word which can rouse different emotions and thoughts, often simultaneously, or left suspended in the air for the mind to mull over. The human voice is arguably the oldest form of transmitting human knowledge, and it was so revered that even Plato allegedly bemoaned the introduction of written text as the very end of it. I asked friends and colleagues to record some of their favorite passages in philosophy and literature. The purpose of which is to not only expose these thinkers and writers to broader audiences, but to hopefully bring smile or thought to enrich your day as we make it through the virus. It wasn't for nothing that during the Great Plague in the early 17th century, Isaac Newton completed his work on calculus, shuttered in his house, left alone with his thoughts. He called it his Annus Mirabilis—Year of Miracles. It's as fitting a title as any, for this series. Enjoy, and endure! Liz Harvey is the owner of the Burn Factory, a competitive bodybuilder, and an opera singer extraordinaire, who will be reading us a passage by the Belgian philosopher, Luce Irigaray, entitled When Our Lips Speak Together.

This episode analyzes Luce Irigaray's Speculum of the Other Woman, Freud, and what woman 'means' in masculine discourse (patriarchy). 

Further information: www.thepanpsycast.com/audiobook. Twitter: www.twitter.com/thepanpsycast. Links Alison Stone's, Lancaster University Profile Page. Alison Stone, An Introduction to Feminist Philosophy. Alison Stone, Feminism, Psychoanalysis, and Maternal Subjectivity. Alison Stone, Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference.  

Este programa se lo dedicamos a uno de nuestros Tobiknockers más leales y veterano, el gran Toni Estrada Caballero. Esta semana en nuestra “Sección principal” toca literatura y en esta ocasión traigo a Charles Dickens, el autor de “Historia de dos ciudades”, “Un cuento de Navidad”, “Oliver Twist”… y otras más de 200 novelas. Os hablaré de su vida, sus mejores obras, las mejores adaptaciones de su trabajo al cine y os leeré el relato breve "El manuscrito de un loco". En la sección “El verso libre” traigo por primera vez a un grupo vasco que me traía loco allá por 2006. Se trata de “Arima Beltza” y el temazo de hoy es “Desirak eta Gezurrak” extraído de su álbum “Mundurako Ateak”. Como siempre os leeré la letra en Euskera y en castellano y después os pondré la canción. En la sección “A golpes de realidad” os traigo toda la actualidad social y política de la semana a través de nuestro bloque dedicado a la violencia de género, nuestro apartado de violencia hacia los menores, el bloque internacional o la actualidad política patria repleta de corrupción política y de terrorismo de estado. Finalmente en la sección “¿Qué fue de?” os hablo de Luce Irigaray, feminista, filosofa y escritora Belga autora entre otros de “Speculum” un libro que fue estandarte de la lucha feminista en Francia y es uno de los más sólidos puntales teóricos de la revolución que propone el feminismo. Tiempos: Sección principal: del 00:02:39 al 02:33:22 Sección “El verso libre”: del 02:33:53 al 02:40:18 Sección “A golpes de realidad”: del 02:41:00 al 04:40:20 Sección “¿Qué fue de?”: del 04:41:28 al 05:26:39 Presentación, dirección, edición y montaje: Asier Menéndez Marín Diseño logo Podcast: albacanodesigns (Alba Cano) Diseño logo Canal: Patrick Grau Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

May 1968 was a watershed moment in political philosophy, and its ripple effect continues. We follow the long trajectory of May '68—from the universities and streets of Paris fifty years ago, via the work of pioneering feminist Luce Irigaray, all the way to the 'New Municipalism' that's transforming the political and social landscapes of cities around the world today.

I'm absolutely thrilled to have Charlene Spretnak on the show today. Charlene is a prolific author in the fields of feminist women's spirituality, environmentalism, and the interrelatedness of social change movements. A summary of each of her books can be found here. The book initially that inspired her to write research into the lost goddess myths of pre-patriarchal Greece is called The First Sex by Elizabeth Gould Davis. The philosopher Charlene mentioned is Luce Irigaray. Charlene has provided me with so much material to research and study. If you'd like to hear the speech I gave inspired by her book, Lost Goddesses of Early Greece, check out TNP64.

When it comes to the history of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in the United States, to paraphrase Luce Irigaray, one never stirs without the other. While Freud sent Theodore Reik across the ocean to promote lay analysis, A.A. Brill, president of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, was preparing to divorce the International Psychoanalytic Association. Brill, driven by a fear that psychoanalysis might be seen as quackery and so discredited, sought to guarantee that the only people allowed to practice psychoanalysis in America were medical doctors. Then came the Anschluss: humanitarian efforts were made to bring the very-same IPA members the Americans sought to separate from onto American soil. This is a pretty well known tale–told by Gay, Hale, Roazen and others; enter Orna Ophir’s book, On the Borderland of Madness: Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA (Routledge, 2015), offering a much needed explanation of how psychoanalysis in America lost its patina. This intellectual history closely studies, via a reading of key journals, the way two professions, for years dancing in close embrace, began to fall out of step. In the same way that the birth of a child with developmental disabilities can reveal a cleavage in what was once thought to be a secure marital bond, debates over the treatment of psychosis led to the eventual separation of two longstanding bedfellows: psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Ophir pieces together the confusing, and previously untold, tale of how psychoanalysis came to be marginalized–and what role psychosis played therein, for its role was key. To carry the conflicted parent metaphor a little further, when a child suffers from psychic distress one member of a couple might seek to understand that suffering in genetic terms while the other spouse might examine the kind of care shown that child: the story of psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis and non-psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis line up similarly. While it is commonly known that the release of new medications to treat psychotic pain beginning in the late 1950s, and the birth of community psychiatry in the 70s, and of course the release of the anti-psychodynamic DSM-III in the 80s all played a role in arguments for the superfluity of analytic treatment for psychosis, Ophir argues that psychoanalysis got sidelined because American psychoanalysts, given their long-standing embrace of psychiatry, were duly handicapped. How to let go of the safety-net of psychiatry–that which is deemed irrefutable, scientific and biologically bound–and still survive was their question. Using ideas from the sociology of the professions/knowledge, Ophir argues that analysts engaged in jurisdictional turf wars that the treatment of psychosis brought to the fore. In a profession largely populated by psychiatrists, during a time when psychosis came to be largely seen as a brain disorder rather than a defense or a remnant of pre-oedipal disturbance, analysts had to decide which side they were on. Analytic clinicians, attempting to stay relevant, began to employ the language of psychiatry, supporting what Ophir calls “the neosomatic revolution” only to find that by doing so, they had thrown out the (psychotic) baby with the bathwater. Discursive shifts, be it in politics or a profession, have deep impacts–(when we hear analysts using the language of brain as opposed to mind we are in the presence of the data produced by that impact) and we see proof of this today: very, very few analysts treat psychosis. As in most every divorce that involves children, custody is not usually distributed evenly. Ophir tells the story of how analysts handed over their psychotic patients ... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When it comes to the history of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in the United States, to paraphrase Luce Irigaray, one never stirs without the other. While Freud sent Theodore Reik across the ocean to promote lay analysis, A.A. Brill, president of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, was preparing to divorce the International Psychoanalytic Association. Brill, driven by a fear that psychoanalysis might be seen as quackery and so discredited, sought to guarantee that the only people allowed to practice psychoanalysis in America were medical doctors. Then came the Anschluss: humanitarian efforts were made to bring the very-same IPA members the Americans sought to separate from onto American soil. This is a pretty well known tale–told by Gay, Hale, Roazen and others; enter Orna Ophir's book, On the Borderland of Madness: Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA (Routledge, 2015), offering a much needed explanation of how psychoanalysis in America lost its patina. This intellectual history closely studies, via a reading of key journals, the way two professions, for years dancing in close embrace, began to fall out of step. In the same way that the birth of a child with developmental disabilities can reveal a cleavage in what was once thought to be a secure marital bond, debates over the treatment of psychosis led to the eventual separation of two longstanding bedfellows: psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Ophir pieces together the confusing, and previously untold, tale of how psychoanalysis came to be marginalized–and what role psychosis played therein, for its role was key. To carry the conflicted parent metaphor a little further, when a child suffers from psychic distress one member of a couple might seek to understand that suffering in genetic terms while the other spouse might examine the kind of care shown that child: the story of psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis and non-psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis line up similarly. While it is commonly known that the release of new medications to treat psychotic pain beginning in the late 1950s, and the birth of community psychiatry in the 70s, and of course the release of the anti-psychodynamic DSM-III in the 80s all played a role in arguments for the superfluity of analytic treatment for psychosis, Ophir argues that psychoanalysis got sidelined because American psychoanalysts, given their long-standing embrace of psychiatry, were duly handicapped. How to let go of the safety-net of psychiatry–that which is deemed irrefutable, scientific and biologically bound–and still survive was their question. Using ideas from the sociology of the professions/knowledge, Ophir argues that analysts engaged in jurisdictional turf wars that the treatment of psychosis brought to the fore. In a profession largely populated by psychiatrists, during a time when psychosis came to be largely seen as a brain disorder rather than a defense or a remnant of pre-oedipal disturbance, analysts had to decide which side they were on. Analytic clinicians, attempting to stay relevant, began to employ the language of psychiatry, supporting what Ophir calls “the neosomatic revolution” only to find that by doing so, they had thrown out the (psychotic) baby with the bathwater. Discursive shifts, be it in politics or a profession, have deep impacts–(when we hear analysts using the language of brain as opposed to mind we are in the presence of the data produced by that impact) and we see proof of this today: very, very few analysts treat psychosis. As in most every divorce that involves children, custody is not usually distributed evenly. Ophir tells the story of how analysts handed over their psychotic patients ... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

When it comes to the history of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in the United States, to paraphrase Luce Irigaray, one never stirs without the other. While Freud sent Theodore Reik across the ocean to promote lay analysis, A.A. Brill, president of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, was preparing to divorce the International Psychoanalytic Association. Brill, driven by a fear that psychoanalysis might be seen as quackery and so discredited, sought to guarantee that the only people allowed to practice psychoanalysis in America were medical doctors. Then came the Anschluss: humanitarian efforts were made to bring the very-same IPA members the Americans sought to separate from onto American soil. This is a pretty well known tale–told by Gay, Hale, Roazen and others; enter Orna Ophir’s book, On the Borderland of Madness: Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA (Routledge, 2015), offering a much needed explanation of how psychoanalysis in America lost its patina. This intellectual history closely studies, via a reading of key journals, the way two professions, for years dancing in close embrace, began to fall out of step. In the same way that the birth of a child with developmental disabilities can reveal a cleavage in what was once thought to be a secure marital bond, debates over the treatment of psychosis led to the eventual separation of two longstanding bedfellows: psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Ophir pieces together the confusing, and previously untold, tale of how psychoanalysis came to be marginalized–and what role psychosis played therein, for its role was key. To carry the conflicted parent metaphor a little further, when a child suffers from psychic distress one member of a couple might seek to understand that suffering in genetic terms while the other spouse might examine the kind of care shown that child: the story of psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis and non-psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis line up similarly. While it is commonly known that the release of new medications to treat psychotic pain beginning in the late 1950s, and the birth of community psychiatry in the 70s, and of course the release of the anti-psychodynamic DSM-III in the 80s all played a role in arguments for the superfluity of analytic treatment for psychosis, Ophir argues that psychoanalysis got sidelined because American psychoanalysts, given their long-standing embrace of psychiatry, were duly handicapped. How to let go of the safety-net of psychiatry–that which is deemed irrefutable, scientific and biologically bound–and still survive was their question. Using ideas from the sociology of the professions/knowledge, Ophir argues that analysts engaged in jurisdictional turf wars that the treatment of psychosis brought to the fore. In a profession largely populated by psychiatrists, during a time when psychosis came to be largely seen as a brain disorder rather than a defense or a remnant of pre-oedipal disturbance, analysts had to decide which side they were on. Analytic clinicians, attempting to stay relevant, began to employ the language of psychiatry, supporting what Ophir calls “the neosomatic revolution” only to find that by doing so, they had thrown out the (psychotic) baby with the bathwater. Discursive shifts, be it in politics or a profession, have deep impacts–(when we hear analysts using the language of brain as opposed to mind we are in the presence of the data produced by that impact) and we see proof of this today: very, very few analysts treat psychosis. As in most every divorce that involves children, custody is not usually distributed evenly. Ophir tells the story of how analysts handed over their psychotic patients ... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When it comes to the history of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in the United States, to paraphrase Luce Irigaray, one never stirs without the other. While Freud sent Theodore Reik across the ocean to promote lay analysis, A.A. Brill, president of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, was preparing to divorce the International Psychoanalytic Association. Brill, driven by a fear that psychoanalysis might be seen as quackery and so discredited, sought to guarantee that the only people allowed to practice psychoanalysis in America were medical doctors. Then came the Anschluss: humanitarian efforts were made to bring the very-same IPA members the Americans sought to separate from onto American soil. This is a pretty well known tale–told by Gay, Hale, Roazen and others; enter Orna Ophir's book, On the Borderland of Madness: Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA (Routledge, 2015), offering a much needed explanation of how psychoanalysis in America lost its patina. This intellectual history closely studies, via a reading of key journals, the way two professions, for years dancing in close embrace, began to fall out of step. In the same way that the birth of a child with developmental disabilities can reveal a cleavage in what was once thought to be a secure marital bond, debates over the treatment of psychosis led to the eventual separation of two longstanding bedfellows: psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Ophir pieces together the confusing, and previously untold, tale of how psychoanalysis came to be marginalized–and what role psychosis played therein, for its role was key. To carry the conflicted parent metaphor a little further, when a child suffers from psychic distress one member of a couple might seek to understand that suffering in genetic terms while the other spouse might examine the kind of care shown that child: the story of psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis and non-psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis line up similarly. While it is commonly known that the release of new medications to treat psychotic pain beginning in the late 1950s, and the birth of community psychiatry in the 70s, and of course the release of the anti-psychodynamic DSM-III in the 80s all played a role in arguments for the superfluity of analytic treatment for psychosis, Ophir argues that psychoanalysis got sidelined because American psychoanalysts, given their long-standing embrace of psychiatry, were duly handicapped. How to let go of the safety-net of psychiatry–that which is deemed irrefutable, scientific and biologically bound–and still survive was their question. Using ideas from the sociology of the professions/knowledge, Ophir argues that analysts engaged in jurisdictional turf wars that the treatment of psychosis brought to the fore. In a profession largely populated by psychiatrists, during a time when psychosis came to be largely seen as a brain disorder rather than a defense or a remnant of pre-oedipal disturbance, analysts had to decide which side they were on. Analytic clinicians, attempting to stay relevant, began to employ the language of psychiatry, supporting what Ophir calls “the neosomatic revolution” only to find that by doing so, they had thrown out the (psychotic) baby with the bathwater. Discursive shifts, be it in politics or a profession, have deep impacts–(when we hear analysts using the language of brain as opposed to mind we are in the presence of the data produced by that impact) and we see proof of this today: very, very few analysts treat psychosis. As in most every divorce that involves children, custody is not usually distributed evenly. Ophir tells the story of how analysts handed over their psychotic patients ... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychoanalysis

When it comes to the history of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in the United States, to paraphrase Luce Irigaray, one never stirs without the other. While Freud sent Theodore Reik across the ocean to promote lay analysis, A.A. Brill, president of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, was preparing to divorce the International Psychoanalytic Association. Brill, driven by a fear that psychoanalysis might be seen as quackery and so discredited, sought to guarantee that the only people allowed to practice psychoanalysis in America were medical doctors. Then came the Anschluss: humanitarian efforts were made to bring the very-same IPA members the Americans sought to separate from onto American soil. This is a pretty well known tale–told by Gay, Hale, Roazen and others; enter Orna Ophir's book, On the Borderland of Madness: Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA (Routledge, 2015), offering a much needed explanation of how psychoanalysis in America lost its patina. This intellectual history closely studies, via a reading of key journals, the way two professions, for years dancing in close embrace, began to fall out of step. In the same way that the birth of a child with developmental disabilities can reveal a cleavage in what was once thought to be a secure marital bond, debates over the treatment of psychosis led to the eventual separation of two longstanding bedfellows: psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Ophir pieces together the confusing, and previously untold, tale of how psychoanalysis came to be marginalized–and what role psychosis played therein, for its role was key. To carry the conflicted parent metaphor a little further, when a child suffers from psychic distress one member of a couple might seek to understand that suffering in genetic terms while the other spouse might examine the kind of care shown that child: the story of psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis and non-psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis line up similarly. While it is commonly known that the release of new medications to treat psychotic pain beginning in the late 1950s, and the birth of community psychiatry in the 70s, and of course the release of the anti-psychodynamic DSM-III in the 80s all played a role in arguments for the superfluity of analytic treatment for psychosis, Ophir argues that psychoanalysis got sidelined because American psychoanalysts, given their long-standing embrace of psychiatry, were duly handicapped. How to let go of the safety-net of psychiatry–that which is deemed irrefutable, scientific and biologically bound–and still survive was their question. Using ideas from the sociology of the professions/knowledge, Ophir argues that analysts engaged in jurisdictional turf wars that the treatment of psychosis brought to the fore. In a profession largely populated by psychiatrists, during a time when psychosis came to be largely seen as a brain disorder rather than a defense or a remnant of pre-oedipal disturbance, analysts had to decide which side they were on. Analytic clinicians, attempting to stay relevant, began to employ the language of psychiatry, supporting what Ophir calls “the neosomatic revolution” only to find that by doing so, they had thrown out the (psychotic) baby with the bathwater. Discursive shifts, be it in politics or a profession, have deep impacts–(when we hear analysts using the language of brain as opposed to mind we are in the presence of the data produced by that impact) and we see proof of this today: very, very few analysts treat psychosis. As in most every divorce that involves children, custody is not usually distributed evenly. Ophir tells the story of how analysts handed over their psychotic patients ... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/medicine

When it comes to the history of psychoanalysis and psychiatry in the United States, to paraphrase Luce Irigaray, one never stirs without the other. While Freud sent Theodore Reik across the ocean to promote lay analysis, A.A. Brill, president of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, was preparing to divorce the International Psychoanalytic Association. Brill, driven by a fear that psychoanalysis might be seen as quackery and so discredited, sought to guarantee that the only people allowed to practice psychoanalysis in America were medical doctors. Then came the Anschluss: humanitarian efforts were made to bring the very-same IPA members the Americans sought to separate from onto American soil. This is a pretty well known tale–told by Gay, Hale, Roazen and others; enter Orna Ophir’s book, On the Borderland of Madness: Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA (Routledge, 2015), offering a much needed explanation of how psychoanalysis in America lost its patina. This intellectual history closely studies, via a reading of key journals, the way two professions, for years dancing in close embrace, began to fall out of step. In the same way that the birth of a child with developmental disabilities can reveal a cleavage in what was once thought to be a secure marital bond, debates over the treatment of psychosis led to the eventual separation of two longstanding bedfellows: psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Ophir pieces together the confusing, and previously untold, tale of how psychoanalysis came to be marginalized–and what role psychosis played therein, for its role was key. To carry the conflicted parent metaphor a little further, when a child suffers from psychic distress one member of a couple might seek to understand that suffering in genetic terms while the other spouse might examine the kind of care shown that child: the story of psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis and non-psychiatrically influenced psychoanalysis line up similarly. While it is commonly known that the release of new medications to treat psychotic pain beginning in the late 1950s, and the birth of community psychiatry in the 70s, and of course the release of the anti-psychodynamic DSM-III in the 80s all played a role in arguments for the superfluity of analytic treatment for psychosis, Ophir argues that psychoanalysis got sidelined because American psychoanalysts, given their long-standing embrace of psychiatry, were duly handicapped. How to let go of the safety-net of psychiatry–that which is deemed irrefutable, scientific and biologically bound–and still survive was their question. Using ideas from the sociology of the professions/knowledge, Ophir argues that analysts engaged in jurisdictional turf wars that the treatment of psychosis brought to the fore. In a profession largely populated by psychiatrists, during a time when psychosis came to be largely seen as a brain disorder rather than a defense or a remnant of pre-oedipal disturbance, analysts had to decide which side they were on. Analytic clinicians, attempting to stay relevant, began to employ the language of psychiatry, supporting what Ophir calls “the neosomatic revolution” only to find that by doing so, they had thrown out the (psychotic) baby with the bathwater. Discursive shifts, be it in politics or a profession, have deep impacts–(when we hear analysts using the language of brain as opposed to mind we are in the presence of the data produced by that impact) and we see proof of this today: very, very few analysts treat psychosis. As in most every divorce that involves children, custody is not usually distributed evenly. Ophir tells the story of how analysts handed over their psychotic patients ... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Columna a cargo de Vanina Pikholc.

Dr Rebbecca Hill speaks about the definition of sexual difference and what is was that inspired her to study sexual difference, as well as Luce Irigaray's theory of sexual difference. Part 1 of a 2 part interview.

Görsel: "Nietzsche's Jungle" (Michael Marder'ın "The Philosopher's Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium" kitabından)"Radiation Jungle" Heidi Norton, 2014, Monique Meloche Gallery.Bir "mimar" ve "kadın" profili olarak kendisinden, işlerinden ve pratiğinden konuşuyoruz, bu haftaki bir nevi girizgâh; Aslıhan'ı stüdyoda ilerleyen vakitte de göreceğiz, kadın meselesi üzerine ilgiye şayan fikriyatını konuşmak üzere.Serinin 5 Şubat tarihli bir önceki programında da konumuz olan Yedikule Bostanları ile ilgili Aslıhan, geçtiğimiz sene Bilgi Üniversitesi'nin "bahar atölyeleri" kapsamında öğrenciler ve bölge sakini çocuklar ile bir çalışma gerçekleştirmiş, ardından da Bilgi Üniversitesi Mimarlık Lisansüstü Programı kapsamında bir atölye yürütmüştü. Aslıhan'ın da sözünü ettiği üzere, atölyelerin iki önemli teması var: "dirayet" ve "müzakere". Atölyede başlayan çalışmaların devamında belediyelerle görüşmeler yapılmış ve başka düzenlemelerin imkânı sorgulanmıştı. Tasarımın bir müzakere aracı olarak kullanılması mümkünlüğünü araştıran atölyenin süreç sonunda kendisine verdiği cevap, güzel bir "evet"!Atölyelere dair içeriğe buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.Bir diğer konumuz olan, Aslıhan'ın Türkiye'deki baraj göllerine dair araştırmasına dayanan araştırması "‪ModernDenemeler‬ 5: ‪Aşı‬", SALT Galata'da ve ardından SALT Ulus'ta sergilenmişti. Sergiye ilişkin ayrıntılı bilgiye buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.Barış Doğru'nun araştırma üzerine Eco IQ'da yayımlanan yazısını buradan okuyabilirsiniz."Aşı" kapsamında hazırlanan detaylı baraj gölleri veri tabanını buradan inceleyebilirsiniz.Aslıhan'ın programda sözünü ettiği Michael Marder'ın yeni çıkan The Philosopher's Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium kitabına, Luce Irigaray ile birlikte yazdıkları önsözü ve Mathilde Roussel'in şahane çizimleri eşlik ediyor. 2014 yılında Columbia University Press'ten çıkan kitaba ilişkin ayrıntılı bilgiye buradan, ve buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.Kant'ın lalesinden Derrida'nın köklerine ya da Hegel'in üzümlerine -bir an "Gazap Üzümleri" diye düşündürmedi değil- epey ilginç bölümler var kitapta.Aslıhan Demirtaş'ın kişisel sitesini de linkte görebilirsiniz.

Görsel: "Nietzsche's Jungle" (Michael Marder'ın "The Philosopher's Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium" kitabından)"Radiation Jungle" Heidi Norton, 2014, Monique Meloche Gallery.Bir "mimar" ve "kadın" profili olarak kendisinden, işlerinden ve pratiğinden konuşuyoruz, bu haftaki bir nevi girizgâh; Aslıhan'ı stüdyoda ilerleyen vakitte de göreceğiz, kadın meselesi üzerine ilgiye şayan fikriyatını konuşmak üzere.Serinin 5 Şubat tarihli bir önceki programında da konumuz olan Yedikule Bostanları ile ilgili Aslıhan, geçtiğimiz sene Bilgi Üniversitesi'nin "bahar atölyeleri" kapsamında öğrenciler ve bölge sakini çocuklar ile bir çalışma gerçekleştirmiş, ardından da Bilgi Üniversitesi Mimarlık Lisansüstü Programı kapsamında bir atölye yürütmüştü. Aslıhan'ın da sözünü ettiği üzere, atölyelerin iki önemli teması var: "dirayet" ve "müzakere". Atölyede başlayan çalışmaların devamında belediyelerle görüşmeler yapılmış ve başka düzenlemelerin imkânı sorgulanmıştı. Tasarımın bir müzakere aracı olarak kullanılması mümkünlüğünü araştıran atölyenin süreç sonunda kendisine verdiği cevap, güzel bir "evet"!Atölyelere dair içeriğe buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.Bir diğer konumuz olan, Aslıhan'ın Türkiye'deki baraj göllerine dair araştırmasına dayanan araştırması "‪ModernDenemeler‬ 5: ‪Aşı‬", SALT Galata'da ve ardından SALT Ulus'ta sergilenmişti. Sergiye ilişkin ayrıntılı bilgiye buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.Barış Doğru'nun araştırma üzerine Eco IQ'da yayımlanan yazısını buradan okuyabilirsiniz."Aşı" kapsamında hazırlanan detaylı baraj gölleri veri tabanını buradan inceleyebilirsiniz.Aslıhan'ın programda sözünü ettiği Michael Marder'ın yeni çıkan The Philosopher's Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium kitabına, Luce Irigaray ile birlikte yazdıkları önsözü ve Mathilde Roussel'in şahane çizimleri eşlik ediyor. 2014 yılında Columbia University Press'ten çıkan kitaba ilişkin ayrıntılı bilgiye buradan, ve buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.Kant'ın lalesinden Derrida'nın köklerine ya da Hegel'in üzümlerine -bir an "Gazap Üzümleri" diye düşündürmedi değil- epey ilginç bölümler var kitapta.Aslıhan Demirtaş'ın kişisel sitesini de linkte görebilirsiniz.

Guest co-host Amy Schiller joins John (and B, kind of) to discuss essays from This Sex Which is Not one by Luce Irigaray, as well as a short passage from her Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. The conversations open with Amy’s ‘vagina park’ overview of Irigaray’s project, seamlessly segueing into discussing Irigaray’s feminist critique of phallogocentrism in […]

KOKU'da bu hafta: Luce Irigaray ve pre-modern ataerkil toplumun duyusal kodlari; Kadinin ilk gunahi: Tat duyusu; Dogum sonrasi rahim sarkmasi durumu icin onerilen koku tedavileri; Cinslere gore icsel isi farklari ve bunlarin fizyonomilere etkisi; Temiz kokan kadina erkek referans: Hz. Isa; Lorenz Oken ve irklarin duyusal hiyerarsisi; Boccaccio ve Jonathan Swift'ten kadin kokusu tanimlari; Yuksek duyular ve alcak duyular hangileridir?