Podcasts about reproducible

Summary In this episode of the Stoke It Up podcast, Alan Stoddard and Kenneth Priest discuss the concept of minimal leadership within the church context. They explore the importance of defining leadership, the need for reproducible leaders, and the role of humility in leadership selection. The conversation emphasizes the uniqueness of each church and the necessity of effective communication and training to foster a culture of leadership. They also share personal experiences and resources for developing leadership within the church. Takeaways Leadership is a process of influencing people. Every church has unique needs for leadership. Reproducible leadership is essential for growth. Humility is a key trait for leaders. Effective communication requires presence and time. Training the trainer is crucial for leadership development. Mistakes in leadership selection can have lasting impacts. Creating a culture of leadership is vital for church health. Monthly meetings with leaders are necessary for accountability. Resources are available for ongoing leadership development. Sound Bites "Training the trainer is essential." "You have to be able to reproduce." "Communication requires presence."

Listen to this interview of Christoph Treude, Open Science Editor at the Journal of Systems and Software, and also Associate Professor of Computer Science, Singapore Management University, Singapore. Christoph Treude : "One good heuristic for deciding whether the research is reproducible is this: Have the authors given others a fair chance at reproducing the results? Because, for me now, particularly in my role as Open Science Editor, I feel that the papers I push back on are the ones where the authors don't even given others a chance to reproduce the results. So, I am not saying that reproducibility has to happen at the push of a button. Of course that would be great. But I also acknowledge that the incentives we have in place now in research publishing and in the academic career do not really favor that approach. On the other hand, if researchers aren't even being given a chance at reproducing something because the data simply aren't available or the algorithm isn't available or there's absolutely no documentation — well then, that is just no good, and it is the kind of scenario where I, as Open Science Editor, will push back on the paper." This interview is a collaboration between the NBN and the Journal of Systems and Software. Link to FSE-C paper about Reproducibility Debt Link to JJS paper about paper links to GitHub Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Listen to this interview of Christoph Treude, Open Science Editor at the Journal of Systems and Software, and also Associate Professor of Computer Science, Singapore Management University, Singapore. Christoph Treude : "One good heuristic for deciding whether the research is reproducible is this: Have the authors given others a fair chance at reproducing the results? Because, for me now, particularly in my role as Open Science Editor, I feel that the papers I push back on are the ones where the authors don't even given others a chance to reproduce the results. So, I am not saying that reproducibility has to happen at the push of a button. Of course that would be great. But I also acknowledge that the incentives we have in place now in research publishing and in the academic career do not really favor that approach. On the other hand, if researchers aren't even being given a chance at reproducing something because the data simply aren't available or the algorithm isn't available or there's absolutely no documentation — well then, that is just no good, and it is the kind of scenario where I, as Open Science Editor, will push back on the paper." This interview is a collaboration between the NBN and the Journal of Systems and Software. Link to FSE-C paper about Reproducibility Debt Link to JJS paper about paper links to GitHub Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump's three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.  Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side). Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents. Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups. Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy. Mentioned: Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024. Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.” Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump's three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.  Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side). Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents. Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups. Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy. Mentioned: Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024. Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.” Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump's three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.  Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side). Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents. Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups. Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy. Mentioned: Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024. Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.” Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump's three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.  Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side). Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents. Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups. Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy. Mentioned: Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024. Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.” Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump's three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.  Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side). Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents. Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups. Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy. Mentioned: Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024. Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.” Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy.

There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump's three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.  Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side). Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents. Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups. Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy. Mentioned: Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024. Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.” Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Wes gives his shell superpowers to solve a tricky problem. Then, we share an update on our favorite Google Photos alternative, including breaking changes and a great new way to run it.Sponsored By:Jupiter Party Annual Membership: Put your support on automatic with our annual plan, and get one month of membership for free!Tailscale: Tailscale is a programmable networking software that is private and secure by default - get it free on up to 100 devices! 1Password Extended Access Management: 1Password Extended Access Management is a device trust solution for companies with Okta, and they ensure that if a device isn't trusted and secure, it can't log into your cloud apps. Support LINUX UnpluggedLinks:

The Second Half, UFO, Chapelwaite, The Gift, Welcome to Chippendales, Supernatural Writing, Google Labs NotebookLM, Who's Been Hacking My Facebook Account?, Chagos Islands, Who Follow Up, Doctor Who Is?

Disciple-Making Task: Back to the Great Commission's Biblical, Simple, and Reproducible DNA

Part 3 of the four episode series produced for the course Open Science for Physicists (OS4P). We discuss with our guest, Dr. Inge Stegeman, who is a neuro-otologist at the University Medical Center Utrecht, about the advantages and pitfalls of open science practices, and how to investigate if these practices have the positive effects that are claimed by their advocates. You can find more about the course at github.com/SanliFaez/OS4Physicists

Hello there!In this episode of The Crop Science Podcast Show, Dr. Andres Patrignani explores innovative soil moisture sensing technologies and their applications. Dr. Patrignani shares his research on soil moisture variability, root zone analysis, and the practical uses of this data for irrigation scheduling and crop management. Tune in to gain insights into soil science and its impact on crop production."Understanding spatial variability in soil moisture is crucial for effective irrigation scheduling and optimizing crop management practices."Meet the guest: Dr. Andres Patrignani is an Associate Professor in Soil Water Processes at Kansas State University with a robust background in soil physics and agronomy. His research focuses on soil moisture sensing, the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, and biophysical modeling. Dr. Patrignani earned his PhD and MSc in Soil Science and Plant and Soil Sciences from Oklahoma State University. His work includes developing root zone soil moisture measurement methods and exploring spatial variability in soil moisture.What you will learn:(00:00) Highlight(01:33) Introduction(05:13) Research on soil moisture sensing(08:45) Applications of soil moisture data(10:18) Spatial variability in soil moisture(16:05) Advancing data science in agronomy(24:17) Reproducible research practices(25:41) Final three questionsThe Crop Science Podcast Show is trusted and supported by the innovative companies:- KWS- CNH RemanAre you ready to unleash the podcasting potential of your company?

What Formula 1 racing can teach us about investing. “It takes a lot of ambition to maximize your wealth over 100 years” - Luca Dellanna I was introduced to Luca's work by Guy Spier in our conversation a year and a half ago. I got see Luca in person a few times since, and we recorded by now three episodes of Talking Billions. Given the kind of long-term, patient, disciplined investing that I practice, Luca's thoughts on long-term games and reproducible success resonate with me and have had a big impact on me. Luca expanded my vocabulary to explain something that I and my clients intuitively understand. I greatly enjoy every episode of Talking Billions as I'm sure you can easily tell, and I can't have favorites, but this conversation is up there in my book, so if you can, don't miss it. Luca Dellanna is a management advisor focused on increasing revenue through better people and operations management. After a master's degree in automotive engineering, Luca spent the first part of his career working for DuPont's consulting unit in Frankfurt, Germany. There, he focused on managerial excellence projects in a variety of manufacturing industries all across Europe. He has also published books about management, human behavior, and economics that earned him appearances on the most important conferences and podcasts in his field, Nudgestock and EconTalk, respectively. Luca writes regularly on Twitter (@DellAnnaLuca). His personal website is www.luca-dellanna.com Today, we talk about the different mindsets of short-term versus long-term players. We talk about how short-term players focus on immediate gains, while long-term players prioritize sustainable growth over time. We discuss the importance of considering the time horizon in investing and life decisions. We talk about understanding the impact of time horizon on risk management and the pursuit of wealth. Luca shares the value of delaying comparison and enjoying the journey in achieving long-term objectives. We discuss how risk management is not about impeding growth but rather about enabling faster growth by protecting against major risks. We talk about how long-term strategies should be sustainable, constructive, and inevitable, ensuring a 100% success rate over the long term. Luca shares that participating in a 'race to the bottom' can lead to sacrificing too much and ultimately losing, even for the winner. 05:00 Short-Term vs. Long-Term Players: A Distinctive Contrast 08:26 Factors Influencing Time Preference: Genetics, Experiences, and Environment 16:13 The Importance of Experiencing Long-Term Benefits for Emotional Solidification 34:16 Navigating Parallel Universes of Success 42:22 The Significance of Delaying Comparison and Enjoying the Journey 53:44 The Relationship Between Risk Management and Growth 01:04:14 Understanding Long-Term Strategies Podcast Program – Disclosure Statement Blue Infinitas Capital, LLC is a registered investment adviser and the opinions expressed by the Firm's employees and podcast guests on this show are their own and do not reflect the opinions of Blue Infinitas Capital, LLC. All statements and opinions expressed are based upon information considered reliable although it should not be relied upon as such. Any statements or opinions are subject to change without notice. Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments, or investment strategies.  Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed.  Information expressed does not take into account your specific situation or objectives, and is not intended as recommendations appropriate for any individual. Listeners are encouraged to seek advice from a qualified tax, legal, or investment adviser to determine whether any information presented may be suitable for their specific situation.  Past performance is not indicative of future performance. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/talking-billions/message

In this episode, Marcel interviews Dr. Christoph Miehl, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago, about topics revolving around open and reproducible science.  Christoph also shares his experience as an eLife community ambassador as well as what it is like to do a postdoc in the US.  Learn more about Dr. Christoph Miehl's work at: https://www.christophmiehl.com/ Check out the review on open science: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89736 Remember to follow us on: X: https://twitter.com/MPPhdnetPodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/offspringmagazine_thepodcast LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/offspring-magazine-the-podcast YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/MaxPlanckPhDnet For feedback, comments, or suggestions, reach out to us at offspring.podcasts@phdnet.mpg.de.  Check out our Offspring Blog for more content: https://www.phdnet.mpg.de/outreach/offspring-blog Intro & Outro music composed by Srinath Ramkumar: https://twitter.com/srinathramkumar Pre-Intro jingle composed by Gustavo Carrizo: https://www.instagram.com/carrizo.gus See you soon!

We try Omakub, a new opinionated Ubuntu desktop for power users and macOS expats.Sponsored By:Core Contributor Membership: Take $1 a month of your membership for a lifetime!Tailscale: Tailscale is a programmable networking software that is private and secure by default - get it free on up to 100 devices!Kolide: Kolide is a device trust solution for companies with Okta, and they ensure that if a device isn't trusted and secure, it can't log into your cloud apps.Support LINUX UnpluggedLinks:

How can you ensure your data and analytic workflows are reproducible and transparent? What are the FAIR principles, and why are they crucial for real-world evidence research? How did a pharmacist and epidemiologist become an expert in real-world data analytics? In this episode, we explore the practicalities of creating reproducible analytic workflows using Git and R with our special guest, Janick Weberpals. As an instructor in medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Janick shares his journey from pharmacist and epidemiologist to an expert in real-world data analytics and methodology. He highlights the critical importance of reproducibility in statistical programming and explains how the FAIR principles—making data and code Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reproducible—can transform research practices. This episode is a must-listen for anyone involved in real-world evidence research, offering hands-on insights and step-by-step guidance to ensure your work is robust and transparent. Tune in to learn how to harness the power of Git and R for your own projects, ensuring that your data and results are both reliable and reproducible.

Welcome to another episode of Category Visionaries — the show that explores GTM stories from tech's most innovative B2B founders. In today's episode, we're speaking with Ron Efroni, CEO & Co-Founder at Flox, a Nix environment management tool that has raised $28 Million in funding. Here are the most interesting points from our conversation: Military Influence: Ron discussed his experience in the 8200 unit, emphasizing how the high-stakes, mission-critical environment of military intelligence provided him with a unique perspective and approach to handling pressure and responsibility, which he has carried into his entrepreneurial ventures. Transition from Military to Entrepreneurship: He touched on the challenges and learning curves associated with moving from a structured military environment to the unpredictability of starting and running startups, highlighting the differences in team dynamics and decision-making processes. Role at Facebook: Before founding Flox, Ron worked at Facebook, where he was responsible for developer products and experiences. This role provided him with insights into large-scale product management and development, influencing his approach to building and managing his own company. Foundation of Flox: The idea for Flox came from Ron's experiences at Facebook and his frustration with the complexities developers face in environment management. His exposure to Nix technology and its potential led him to co-found Flox to simplify and streamline development environments for programmers. Community Engagement and Open Source Philosophy: Ron is actively involved in the Nix community and advocates for open source development. He aims to support and grow the Nix ecosystem, reflecting his commitment to collaborative innovation and community-driven development. Future Vision for Flox: Looking ahead, Ron envisions Flox significantly lowering barriers to software development by enhancing and expanding the capabilities of Nix environments, making development more accessible and efficient across the industry.  

Xiao Xiao Tong discusses an AJR article that found interreader agreement assessed among ten radiologists was substantial both for the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound risk category assignment and for the surgical consultation recommendations. In particular, the variability was less relevant in the recommendation for surgical consultation and in assigning the indeterminate risk category. ARTICLE TITLE - Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations for Incidental Gallbladder Polyp Management: Interreader Agreement Among Ten Radiologists

Hugo speaks with Omoju Miller, a machine learning guru and founder and CEO of Fimio, where she is building 21st century dev tooling. In the past, she was Technical Advisor to the CEO at GitHub, spent time co-leading non-profit investment in Computer Science Education for Google, and served as a volunteer advisor to the Obama administration's White House Presidential Innovation Fellows. We need open tools, open data, provenance, and the ability to build fully reproducible, transparent machine learning workflows. With the advent of closed-source, vendor-based APIs and compute becoming a form of gate-keeping, developer tools are at the risk of becoming commoditized and developers becoming consumers. We'll talk about how ideas for escaping these burgeoning walled gardens. We'll dive into What fully reproducible ML workflows would look like, including git for the workflow build process, The need for loosely coupled and composable tools that embrace a UNIX-like philosophy, What a much more scientific toolchain would look like, What a future open sources commons for Generative AI could look like, What an open compute ecosystem could look like, How to create LLMs and tooling so everyone can use them to build production-ready apps, And much more! LINKS The livestream on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/live/n81PWNsHSMk?si=pgX2hH5xADATdJMu) Omoju on Twitter (https://twitter.com/omojumiller) Hugo on Twitter (https://twitter.com/hugobowne) Vanishing Gradients on Twitter (https://twitter.com/vanishingdata) Lu.ma Calendar that includes details of Hugo's European Tour for Outerbounds (https://lu.ma/Outerbounds) Blog post that includes details of Hugo's European Tour for Outerbounds (https://outerbounds.com/blog/ob-on-the-road-2024-h1/)

People are talking about the "Reproducibility Crisis" in science. Good to see, that there are researchers that do something about it.  Meet Rima-Maria Rahal and Peter Steinbach from the German Reprodicibility Network. I met Rima and Peter in 2023 to talk about why reproducibility is important, what we as researchers can do to make our work more reproducible and what the network is doing in Germanyhttps://reproducibilitynetwork.de  The German Reproducibility Network homepagehttps://www.ukrn.org The UK Reproducibility Networkhttps://reproducibilitynetwork.nl The network in the Netherlandshttps://www.ukrn.org/global-networks/ and a list of other networks around the globe (from the UK network site)Support the Show.Thank you for listening and your ongoing support. It means the world to us! Support the show on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/codeforthought Get in touch: Email mailto:code4thought@proton.me UK RSE Slack (ukrse.slack.com): @code4thought or @piddie US RSE Slack (usrse.slack.com): @Peter Schmidt Mastadon: https://fosstodon.org/@code4thought or @code4thought@fosstodon.org LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/pweschmidt/ (personal Profile)LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/codeforthought/ (Code for Thought Profile) This podcast is licensed under the Creative Commons Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

I chatted with William Ngiam of the ReproducibiliTEA podcast about scientific rigor and reproducibility, and the daunting, exciting, creative work of making science better. If you liked this episode, check out Will & co. on the ReproducibiliTEA podcast! 2024 has already been hectic, but I hope to be back next week with more SfN Shorts! In Plain English now has a Discord server! Join ⁠here ⁠to chat with other listeners, past experts, and guests about science, suggest new episode topics, and more! Remember to follow In Plain English on ⁠Facebook ⁠, ⁠Twitter⁠, and ⁠Instagram ⁠to keep up with the latest announcements! If you are able, please consider ⁠becoming a Patron⁠ to help support In Plain English! And check out our ⁠Where to Listen⁠ page to subscribe to our podcast on your favorite platform! Intro/Outro music credit: Sam Brunwasser (⁠https://soundcloud.com/visualsnowbeats⁠) Image credit: UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science, 2021

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: On OpenAI Dev Day, published by Zvi on November 9, 2023 on LessWrong. OpenAI DevDay was this week. What delicious and/or terrifying things await? Turbo Boost First off, we have GPT-4-Turbo. Today we're launching a preview of the next generation of this model, GPT-4 Turbo. GPT-4 Turbo is more capable and has knowledge of world events up to April 2023. It has a 128k context window so it can fit the equivalent of more than 300 pages of text in a single prompt. We also optimized its performance so we are able to offer GPT-4 Turbo at a 3x cheaper price for input tokens and a 2x cheaper price for output tokens compared to GPT-4. GPT-4 Turbo is available for all paying developers to try by passing gpt-4-1106-preview in the API and we plan to release the stable production-ready model in the coming weeks. Knowledge up to April 2023 is a big game. Cutting the price in half is another big game. A 128k context window retakes the lead on that from Claude-2. That chart from last week of how GPT-4 was slow and expensive, opening up room for competitors? Back to work, everyone. What else? Function calling updates Function calling lets you describe functions of your app or external APIs to models, and have the model intelligently choose to output a JSON object containing arguments to call those functions. We're releasing several improvements today, including the ability to call multiple functions in a single message: users can send one message requesting multiple actions, such as "open the car window and turn off the A/C", which would previously require multiple roundtrips with the model (learn more). We are also improving function calling accuracy: GPT-4 Turbo is more likely to return the right function parameters. This kind of feature seems highly fiddly and dependent. When it starts working well enough, suddenly it is great, and I have no idea if this will count. I will watch out for reports. For now, I am not trying to interact with any APIs via GPT-4. Use caution. Improved instruction following and JSON mode GPT-4 Turbo performs better than our previous models on tasks that require the careful following of instructions, such as generating specific formats (e.g., "always respond in XML"). It also supports our new JSON mode, which ensures the model will respond with valid JSON. The new API parameter response_format enables the model to constrain its output to generate a syntactically correct JSON object. JSON mode is useful for developers generating JSON in the Chat Completions API outside of function calling. Better instruction following is incrementally great. Always frustrating when instructions can't be relied upon. Could allow some processes to be profitably automated. Reproducible outputs and log probabilities The new seed parameter enables reproducible outputs by making the model return consistent completions most of the time. This beta feature is useful for use cases such as replaying requests for debugging, writing more comprehensive unit tests, and generally having a higher degree of control over the model behavior. We at OpenAI have been using this feature internally for our own unit tests and have found it invaluable. We're excited to see how developers will use it. Learn more. We're also launching a feature to return the log probabilities for the most likely output tokens generated by GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-3.5 Turbo in the next few weeks, which will be useful for building features such as autocomplete in a search experience. I love the idea of seeing the probabilities of different responses on the regular, especially if incorporated into ChatGPT. It provides so much context for knowing what to make of the answer. The distribution of possible answers is the true answer. Super excited in a good way. Updated GPT-3.5 Turbo In addition to GPT-4 Turbo, we are also releasing a...

Reflections on the amazing posit::conf(2023), a new framework that'll have you snap into HTML slides, the Nix reproducible data science train powers forward into CI/CD territory, and leveraging parallel processing in spatial data prediction. Episode Links This week's curator: Batool Almarzouq - @batool664 (https://twitter.com/batool664) (Twitter) Reflections on posit conf(2023) (https://jillymackay.com/post/positconf2023/) Snap Slides: a Lightweight HTML Presentation Framework (https://yihui.org/en/2023/09/snap-slides/) Parallel raster processing in stars (https://www.r-spatial.org//r/2023/09/21/stars-parallel.html) Reproducible data science with Nix, part 6 -- CI/CD has never been easier (https://www.brodrigues.co/blog/2023-09-20-nix_for_r_part6/) Entire issue available at rweekly.org/2023-W39 (https://rweekly.org/2023-W39.html) Supplement Resources Shiny in Production Tools & Techniques https://posit-conf-2023.github.io/shiny-r-prod/ Jill McKay's posit conf presentation https://jillymackay.github.io/positconf2023_vetdata/positconf2023.html#/title-slide Scroll snap technique https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSSScrollSnap/Basic_concepts Data science at the command line https://datascienceatthecommandline.com/ Spatial data science with applications in R https://r-spatial.org/book/ geoparquet https://geoparquet.org/ Supporting the show Use the contact page at https://rweekly.fireside.fm/contact to send us your feedback R-Weekly Highlights on the Podcastindex.org (https://podcastindex.org/podcast/1062040) - You can send a boost into the show directly in the Podcast Index. First, top-up with Alby (https://getalby.com/), and then head over to the R-Weekly Highlights podcast entry on the index. A new way to think about value: https://value4value.info Get in touch with us on social media Eric Nantz: @theRcast (https://twitter.com/theRcast) (Twitter) and @rpodcast@podcastindex.social (https://podcastindex.social/@rpodcast) (Mastodon) Mike Thomas: @mike_ketchbrook (https://twitter.com/mike_ketchbrook) (Twitter) and @mike_thomas@fosstodon.org (https://fosstodon.org/@mike_thomas) (Mastodon) Music credits powered by OCRemix (https://ocremix.org/) Azure Your Cause (The Color of the Summer Sky) - Secret of Mana Resonance of the Pure Land - Rexy - https://ocremix.org/remix/OCR03650 Secrets Abound (Matoya's Cave) - FInal Fantast Random Encounter - Midgarian Sky - https://ocremix.org/remix/OCR02452 Thunder Beam (Elec Man Stage) - Mega Man Series The Robot Museum - Joshua Morse - https://museum.ocremix.org/

The second edition of the highly-regarded R for Data Science arrives with substantial updates, an adventure with "A Programming Language" that brings new perspectives to functional programming approaches, and a new take on reproducibility in data science combining R with the Nix packaging system. Episode Links This week's curator: Eric Nantz - @theRcast (https://twitter.com/theRcast) (Twitter) & @rpodcast@podcastindex.social (https://podcastindex.social/@rpodcast) (Mastodon) R for Data Science, 2nd edition (https://www.tidyverse.org/blog/2023/07/r4ds-2e/) Array Languages: R vs APL (https://jcarroll.com.au/2023/07/07/array-languages-r-vs-apl/) Reproducible data science with Nix (https://www.brodrigues.co/blog/2023-07-13-nix_for_r_part1/) Entire issue available at rweekly.org/2023-W29 (https://rweekly.org/2023-W29.html) Supplement Resources R for Data Science 2nd Edition: https://r4ds.hadley.nz/ APL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL(programminglanguage) Try APL in a browser: https://tryapl.org/ Jonathan Carroll could be available for your next project! https://fosstodon.org/@jonocarroll/110726981972909319 Linux Unplugged Episode 451 The NixOS Challenge https://www.jupiterbroadcasting.com/show/linux-unplugged/451/ Zero to Nix - An unofficial, opinionated, gentle introduction to Nix https://zero-to-nix.com/ It's not too late to register for Eric and Mike's Shiny in Production workshop at posit::conf(2023)! https://reg.conf.posit.co/flow/posit/positconf23/attendee-portal/page/sessioncatalog?search=shiny&search.sessiontype=1675316728702001wr6r&search.day=20230918 Supporting the show Use the contact page at https://rweekly.fireside.fm/contact to send us your feedback R-Weekly Highlights on the Podcastindex.org (https://podcastindex.org/podcast/1062040) - You can send a boost into the show directly in the Podcast Index. First, top-up with Alby (https://getalby.com/), and then head over to the R-Weekly Highlights podcast entry on the index. A new way to think about value: https://value4value.info Get in touch with us on social media Eric Nantz: @theRcast (https://twitter.com/theRcast) (Twitter) and @rpodcast@podcastindex.social (https://podcastindex.social/@rpodcast) (Mastodon) Mike Thomas: @mike_ketchbrook (https://twitter.com/mike_ketchbrook) (Twitter) and @mike_thomas@fosstodon.org (https://fosstodon.org/@mike_thomas) (Mastodon)

Find more podcast episodes here: ⁠⁠⁠https://access2perspectives.pubpub.org/podcast Host:⁠⁠⁠ Dr Jo Havemann⁠⁠⁠, ORCID iD ⁠⁠⁠0000-0002-6157-1494 ⁠⁠⁠Editing: ⁠⁠⁠Ebuka Ezeike⁠⁠⁠ Music:⁠⁠⁠ Alex Lustig⁠⁠⁠, produced by⁠⁠⁠ Kitty Kat ⁠⁠⁠License:⁠⁠⁠ Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)   ⁠⁠⁠ At Access 2 Perspectives, we guide you in your complete research workflow toward state-of-the-art research practices and in full compliance with funding and publishing requirements. Leverage your research projects to higher efficiency and increased collaboration opportunities while fostering your explorative spirit and joy. Website: ⁠⁠⁠https://access2perspectives.pubpub.org⁠ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/access2perspectives/message

Our guest today is Zoltán Kekecs, a Ph.D. holder in Behavioural Science. Zoltán highlights the problem of low replicability in journal papers and illustrates how researchers can better ensure complete replication of their research and findings. He used Bem's experiment as an example, extensively talking about his methodology and results.

Reproducible research is a key part of research in the pharma industry. It allows for transparency, understanding, and accuracy in the research process. But how can you make your research more reproducible? Today, I talk with Heidi Seibold who has dedicated her career to helping researchers become more reproducible. Let's take a look at 3 steps that she recommended for making your research more reproducible:

Macro history is the history of non-reproducible systems. So what does this mean? A non-reproducible system is one in which there are too many variables to be easily reset and replayed from the beginning. It is history that is not directly amenable to a controlled experiment. On a very large scale, it is the history of humanity. With the introduction of document digitization, macro history can be more easily recorded and understood. This episode will cover the following: Recap of microhistory Micro history vs macro history Why our history is subjective Why better recordkeeping standards will improve innovation Why Big Data should really be called Big History Why citizens' assemblies are a better way to govern How having a shared understanding of what is true impacts decision-making What are the key performance indicators of a country? What are the KPIs that drive business? If micro history and macro history were on a continuum, they would be on opposite sides. Macro history is the history we know more of, it's a lot messier. More easily put, science progresses by taking phenomena formerly thought of as non-reproducible (and hence unpredictable) systems, isolating key variables, and turning them into reproducible (and hence predictable) systems. Science progresses through records management, something that has quickly improved in the digitized world. Why do recordkeeping and the scientific method lead to progress? Why is it important? What we know about history is from what we have recovered from what people have written down - an imperfect way of recording history. Today, we have digital documentation on an unprecedented scale, changing the way we record and recover information. Why do we want to measure this stuff? Optimizing market performance might be one answer, but if we start monitoring everything people do, where do we draw the line on privacy? Let us know what you think in the comments below! Subscribe for perks: https://www.networkstatepodcast.com/subscribe Follow Us: https://linktr.ee/networkstatepodcast Loved this episode? Leave us a review - Follow our hosts: Adrien Harrison: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adrien-harrison Raphael Benros: https://twitter.com/raphaelbenros?s=21&t=ASDnEGiKp0e4tc_FR2JUwg Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors. For more details please see https://networkstatepodcast.com JOIN THE COMMUNITY: If you're also interested in being a part of the conversation, please like, subscribe, comment, share, and rate the podcast! Sign up for our newsletter to get exclusive perks like our member community, deals on merch, and early access to other surprises :) VISIT: https://networkstatepodcast.com Loved this episode? Leave us a review and rating here: SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7skrNReA41oE7BFYVqpR5w APPLE PODCASTS: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-network-state-podcast/id1658822250 --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/better-societies/message

Research is carried out to obtain new knowledge, find solutions to pertinent problems, and challenge the researchers' abilities. Two key aspects of the scientific process are reproducibility and replicability, which sound similar but are distinctly different. In this episode, Erik G. Larsson and Emil Björnson discuss these principles and their impact on wireless communication research. The conversation covers the replication crisis, Monte Carlo simulations, best practices, pitfalls that new researchers should avoid, and what the community can become better at. The following article is mentioned: “Reproducible Research: Best Practices and Potential Misuse” (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.00645.pdf). Music: On the Verge by Joseph McDade. Visit Erik's website https://liu.se/en/employee/erila39 and Emil's website https://ebjornson.com/

Bella chats with professor Russ Poldrack.Russ is the Albert Ray Lang professor of psychology at Stanford University, where he directs the Poldrack lab. Russ also serves as the director of the Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience and the SDS center for Open and Reproducible science. Russ and his lab use cognitive, computational, and neuroimaging approaches to study how decision-making, executive control, and learning and memory are implemented in the human brain.In this episode, we discussed Russ's research in cognitive neuroscience using neuroimaging techniques such as MRI and fMRI, as well as his effort and contribution to reproducible science. For example, along with colleagues, Russ created and is currently managing a platform called Openneuro, an Open Archive For Analysis And Sharing Of Brain Initiative Data. Russ also talked about an innovative and fascinating study called “My connectome project”, in which he was his own subject for 18 months. He then shared interesting findings from this project and how this project had impacted how he thinks about his brain and future neuroimaging research. In the end, Russ shared his advice and tips with people who are applying to graduate school in neuroscience, as well as a fun story about discovering a surprising finding in his own brain.If you find this episode interesting, please leave us a good review on your podcast platform! It only takes a few minutes, but it will allow our podcast to reach more people and hopefully get them excited about psychology and brain sciences.Links:Russ's lab: https://poldracklab.stanford.edu/Russ's Twitter: @russpoldrackRuss's books: - Hard to Break: why our brains make habits stick https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691194325/hard-to-brea- The New Mind Readers https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691178615/the-new-mind-readersBella's website: https://bellafascendini.github.io/Bella's Twitter: @BellaFascendiniPodcast Twitter: @StanfordPsyPodPodcast Substack: https://stanfordpsypod.substack.com/Let us know what you think of this episode or the podcast! :) stanfordpsychpodcast@gmail.com

This week on Neurosalience, something a little different: a live podcast recorded at the OHBM 2022 Annual Meeting featuring a continuation of a discussion of the recent paper "Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals" by Scott Marek et al. This paper set the stage for some great discussions about what it means for the field and its broader implications for brain research (see Season 2 Episode 21 for a discussion with the authors: https://bit.ly/3T1lWu8). For the live podcast we are joined by four leaders in the field whose research is very related and hinges on the ideas around the Marek et al. paper. Guests: Avram Holmes, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Psychology and of Psychiatry at Yale University. Caterina Gratton, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Northwestern University. Paul Thompson, Ph.D. is a Professor of Ophthalmology, Neurology, Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, Radiology, Psychiatry, and Engineering and Associate Director of the USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute. Monica Rosenberg, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Chicago. Episode producers: Alfie Wearn Jeff Mentch Brain Art Artists: Sahar Ahmad, Ye Wu and Pew-Thian Yap Title: MindMap - The Intricate Wiring of the Human Brain Description: The human brain is an enormously complex network of interconnected neurons. Brain activity is orchestrated via information propagation between cortical and subcortical gray matter through fiber tracts that interweave long projections of nerve cells in white matter. This image, captured via diffusion MRI, illustrates the marvel of the intricate wiring patterns of the human brain. Please send any feedback, guest suggestions, or ideas to ohbm.comcom@gmail.com

#141 - *We apologize for this week's audio issues. However, this was such a fun podcast jam-packed with wisdom that we just had to share it.* On today's episode of the podcast we sit down with our friend Mac Lake, founder of Multiply Group, and discuss the power of reproducing the process of leadership development. We hope you enjoy episode 141 of the Lead Volunteers Podcast and share it with a ministry leader you know who may find this beneficial for their ministry context! If you would like to gain INSTANT access to the bank of resources mentioned in today's episode, check out leadministry.com and get started today! Follow us on Facebook and Instagram!

This week Dave talks with Mike Bursell (https://dgshow.org/guests/mbursell) and Nathaniel McCallum (https://dgshow.org/guests/nmccallum) about confidential computing! Check out Mike on D&G 201 (https://dgshow.org/201) from 2020! Enarx (https://enarx.dev/) Red Hat (https://www.redhat.com/en) Profian (https://www.profian.com/) McCallum-Relyea exchange (https://www.admin-magazine.com/Archive/2018/43/Automatic-data-encryption-and-decryption-with-Clevis-and-Tang) Trusted computing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Computing) Confidential computing – the new HTTPS? (https://aliceevebob.com/2019/12/03/confidential-computing-the-new-https/) Confidential Computing Consortium (https://confidentialcomputing.io/) Trusted Platform Module (TPM) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module) Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_execution_environment) Digital Rights Management (DRM) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management) Intel SGX (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/software-guard-extensions.html) AMD SEV (https://developer.amd.com/sev/) AWS Nitro System (https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/nitro/) What is attestation for Confidential Computing? (https://aliceevebob.com/2022/06/14/what-is-attestation-for-confidential-computing/) WebAssembly (https://webassembly.org/) Bytecode Alliance (https://bytecodealliance.org/) Drawbridge (https://github.com/profianinc/drawbridge) Keep (https://github.com/enarx/enarx-keepldr) Secure multi-party computation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_multi-party_computation) Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PET) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy-enhancing_technologies) Homomorphic encryption (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homomorphic_encryption) Functional equivalence and formal equivalence checking (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_equivalence_checking) What is a Linux Container? (https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/containers/whats-a-linux-container) Functions as a Service (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_as_a_service) UEFI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFI) Reproducible builds (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducible_builds) Trusted Computing Base (TCB) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing_base) Confidential Computing: try it now, for free (https://blog.profian.com/confidential-computing-now-for-free/) FedRAMP (https://www.fedramp.gov/) Bell–LaPadula model (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%E2%80%93LaPadula_model) NVIDIA Confidential Computing (https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/solutions/confidential-computing/) U.S. and U.K. Launch Innovation Prize Challenges in Privacy-Enhancing Technologies to Tackle Financial Crime and Public Health Emergencies (https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2022/07/20/u-s-and-u-k-launch-innovation-prize-challenges-in-privacy-enhancing-technologies-to-tackle-financial-crime-and-public-health-emergencies/) Advancing a Vision for Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2022/06/28/advancing-a-vision-for-privacy-enhancing-technologies/) Accelerating the adoption and development of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) (https://petsprizechallenges.com/) Trust in Computer Systems and the Cloud (https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Trust+in+Computer+Systems+and+the+Cloud-p-9781119692324) We Give Thanks * Mike Bursell (https://dgshow.org/guests/mbursell) and Nathaniel McCallum (https://dgshow.org/guests/nmccallum) for joining us on the show! * Jen Wike Huger (https://twitter.com/JenWike) for connecting the dots! Special Guests: Mike Bursell and Nathaniel McCallum.

Do you have vision of the Kingdom Movement opportunity ahead of you? If so, you need a reproducible disciple-making process in your cultural context. A blueprint that enables you to go after that which God has placed on your heart. In this episode, Kevin and Derek discuss the importance of mastering a reproducible disciple-making process. Through scripture and personal experience they uncover the absolute necessity of having one because, without it, nothing else will do.Resources:Disciple-Making Grid:https://movementdrivetrain.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/FAMM+Strategic+Grid+For+a+Reproducable+Disciple-Making+Process.pdfD2D Digital Copy: https://www.gofamm.org/product-page/vol-1-disciple-2-disciple-digitalD2D Hard Copy: https://www.gofamm.org/product-page/d2dLooking to Partner with FAMM? https://www.gofamm.org/partnerScripture References:Acts 17:2Titus 1:51 Corinthians 32 timothy 1:13-142 timothy 2:2 Connect with FAMM:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gofammFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/forallmankindWebsite: https://www.gofamm.org/Questions about this episode? Email us at info@gofamm.org

On this episode of the podcast, I walk through some of the takeaways I got from reading "Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control" by Walter A. Shewhart. ---------------------------------------------------------- Who Was Walter Shewhart? Link

This week's guest is Kyle Konas! He owns Shift Health Center and will be sharing his experience with all of us. This week's topics cover: Creating SOPs Delegating Tasks Creating repeatable scale and more! If you are interested in starting your business, growing your current business, or want to just listen to some great talk from the hot tub, you're in the right place! Check in with Kyle by contacting them below! This week's guest: Name: Kyle Konas Company: Shift Health Center Website: https://theshifttc.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theshiftTC LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/theshifttc/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeXnkNLo4PrJZeiGliG-fPg/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_shift_tc/ Special Offer: $47 New Patient Special Join us on Volley for the After Party! https://hi.volley.app/land?tk=iUUYT9ziZvK3fFFRRtiZTE-tk Don't forget to connect with TubPreneurs! LinkTree: https://linktr.ee/tubpreneurs Facebook: https://facebook.com/tubpreneurs Instagram: https://instagram.com/tubpreneurs LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/tubpreneurs/ Twitch: https://twitch.tv/tubpreneurs YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHr_aA78FeJsLWN2Fvkfjgw --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/tubpreneurs/support

Is your life something that mimics Jesus? If someone was to mimic you, would they be more or less like Christ? We are called to live lives that mimic our Savior. This week Christa Smith starts a series on 1 Thessalonians and living a life worth reproducing. Get Connected! https://linktr.ee/reachtulsa

WELCOME to EPISODE 81 of the Church Growth Podcast! ///

Today, you'll learn about the state of the Amazon rainforest, the truth behind the mythical sugar rush, and how studies involving MRI scans may have been too small to produce significant results, but researchers may have found a solution.The forest needs attention - not the company.“75% of Amazon rainforest shows signs of loss, a 'tipping point' of dieback, study shows” by Doyle Ricettps://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2022/03/07/amazon-rainforest-dieback-deforestation-climate-change-study/9380372002“Fires in the Amazon are out of Control. Again” by Benji Joneshttps://www.vox.com/down-to-earth/2021/8/27/22639885/amazon-rainforest-fires-climate-change-2021“Heaviest Object on Earth Weighs 116B Pounds” by Jenn Gidmanhttps://www.newser.com/story/259238/the-10-heaviest-objects-on-earth.html“A Framework for Quantifying Resilience to Forest Disturbance” by Timothy Bryant, Kristen Waring, Andrew Sánchez Meador, and John B. Bradfordhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00056/full“7 Organizations You Can Support to Protect the Amazon Rainforest” by Erica Sánchez, Pia Gralki, and Joe McCarthyhttps://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/organizations-donate-amazon-rainforest/ Maybe sugar isn't the problem.“Sugar rush or high on life? Dieticians explain why kids become hyperactive at parties” by Kate Dorrellhttps://www.abc.net.au/everyday/sugar-rush-dietician-does-sweet-food-make-kids-hyperactive/100839044“There's No Such Thing as a Sugar Rush, According to Science” by Joshua A. Krischhttps://www.fatherly.com/health-science/theres-no-thing-sugar-rush-according-science/Data sets need to grow to bolster studies.“M.R.I.s Are Finding Connections Between Our Brain Activity and Psychology” By Kim Tingleyhttps://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/19/magazine/mri-brain-activity-psychology.html“Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals” By Scott marek et alhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04492-9“Brain scans may reveal a lot about mental illness, but not until studies get bigger” by Jon Hamiltonhttps://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/04/26/1094319294/mri-brain-scan-mental-illness-brain-researchFollow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to get smarter with Calli and Nate — for free! Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers.Find episode transcripts here: https://curiosity-daily-4e53644e.simplecast.com/episodes/the-amazons-future-sugar-rush-retcon-a-study-on-studies

FreeBSD Status Report 4th Quarter 2021, Reproducible clean $HOME in OpenBSD using impermanence, Making RockPro64 a NetBSD Server, helloSystem 0.7.0 is out, lazy approach to FreeBSD dual-booting, going to jail, and more. NOTES This episode of BSDNow is brought to you by Tarsnap (https://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow) and the BSDNow Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/bsdnow) Headlines FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report 4th Quarter 2021 (https://www.freebsd.org/status/report-2021-10-2021-12/) Reproducible clean $HOME in OpenBSD using impermanence (https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-03-15-openbsd-impermanence.html) News Roundup Making RockPro64 a NetBSD Server (https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/making_rockpro64_a_netbsd_server) helloSystem 0.7.0 is out (https://github.com/helloSystem/ISO/releases/tag/r0.7.0) My lazy approach to FreeBSD dual-booting (https://rubenerd.com/my-lazy-approach-to-freebsd-dual-booting/) Going to jail (https://opekkt.tech/docs/vps_migration/going2jail/) Tarsnap This weeks episode of BSDNow was sponsored by our friends at Tarsnap, the only secure online backup you can trust your data to. Even paranoids need backups. Feedback/Questions • No Feedback emails this week, so instead we can have “Story Time with Allan” and he can regale us with an entertaining BSD story. Send questions, comments, show ideas/topics, or stories you want mentioned on the show to feedback@bsdnow.tv (mailto:feedback@bsdnow.tv) ***

In order for Jesus' mission of making disciples to be successful, the methods He used would have to be reproducible. They would have to be something every disciple could understand and do in their own lives. This is where the Reproducible Process of a Disciple Making Culture comes into play. We must lead others and raise up others in a way that is clear enough for others to follow. And simple enough for them to live out. Join us today as we explore the Reproducible Process that Jesus used.