POPULARITY
Categories
Josh Monday Christian and Conspiracy Podcast Ep. 264If you want to support the ministry: $5.99 a monthpatreon.com/JoshMondayChristianandConspiracyPodcastNorbert Heuser Website:https://improveyourlifewithnorbert.com/Join the Patreon here: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/Joshmonday_podcastIf you want to donate to the Ministry or Buy the Mug Here is our CashAPP:https://cash.app/$JoshmondaymusicNew affiliate: https://wsteif.com/ Sign up for Gold and Silver 7Kmetals: https://www.cocsilver.com/Flat Earth Books by Sakal Publishing Affiliate Link: https://booksonline.club/booksonlinecYoutube: @joshmondaymusicandpodcast Tips for the show to Support our Ministry: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/joshmondayCoffee Mug Is Available email me your mailing address Joshmonday@rocketmail.com Please subscribe to our Spotify and You Tube Channel Joshmondaymusic and Podcast and help us grow so we can keep on spreading the good news.To all of our current and future subscribers thank you for your time, we appreciate you. Please do us a favor subscribe to our You Tube Channel, hit that bell, share, like and comment below on our You tube. Please leave us a 5-Star review on Apple and Spotify.Check out my new show Sunday Service and Wednesday Brought to you by Cult of Conspiracy Podcast. On Cult of Conspiracy Spotify, Patreon and Apple Podcast Channel.Join the study as I go deep into the Bible. Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. Romans 10:17.This is Part 2 to Reverse Osmosis Water Blessing or Curse.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/josh-monday-christian-and-conspiracy-podcast--6611118/support.
Is capitalism really crushing the middle class—or are bad policies and worse narratives to blame?In this episode of the Let People Prosper Show, I'm joined by Dr. Norbert Michel, vice president and director of the Cato Institute's Center for Monetary and Fiscal Alternatives. We dig into his new book, Crushing Capitalism: How Populist Policies Are Threatening The American Dream.Norbert pulls back the curtain on the false story of a stagnating middle class, exposes the economic harms of tariffs and industrial policy, and makes the principled case for decentralization and free-market capitalism. This is a must-listen if you're tired of political narratives distorting economic reality—and want honest solutions that let people prosper.For more insights, visit vanceginn.com. You can also get even greater value by subscribing to my Substack newsletter at vanceginn.substack.com.
The harmful effects of caffeine and energy drinks on college students: Are energy drinks bad for you? Born and raised in Germany, Norbert Heuser spent most of his professional life between his residence in Germany and Asia. He is a German entrepreneur, inventor, life & health coach, public speaker and author. Norbert had his own companies in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Germany and in the USA. Working with and among the Chinese for the past 35 years he had a deeper look into the culture and lifestyle than a regular Western person could possibly have. It is there he was introduced to Chinese Medicine. Norbert alternates between Europe and the USA, where he is invited as a public speaker, delivers seminars, and webinars, and appears on interviews and talk shows. In episode 576 of the Fraternity Foodie Podcast, we find out what inspired Norbert's passion for alternative medicine, how his personal health challenges and his grandson's health issues shaped his current mission and work, some of the biggest misconceptions students have about caffeine, the harmful effects of caffeine and energy drinks, how to reduce or eliminate caffeine safely, healthy and energizing alternatives to coffee or energy drinks, the truth behind the water we drink on campus every day, and how caffeine and other factors can contribute to mental health challenges.
Sun, 15 Jun 2025 08:47:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2337-offline-podcast-s1-02-videorekorder-pornos-und-kung-fu-70er-80er-90er-der-podcast-zum-buch-seltenreich-peter-feat-drastil ced01dd0209286f341badca4ea618f85 Herzensangelegenheit für die Super Me Sundays auf audio-cd.at: Der Offline-Podcast. Marco Seltenreich ist passionierter Selbstdenker, Buchautor und bei der Strabag Real Estate für Kommunikation und Pressearbeit zuständig. Norbert Peter ist Kabarettist, Kommunikationstrainer und Autor. Ich bin featuring. Marco und Norbert sind Autoren vom Buch "Offline", das launig in die 70er, 80er und 90er zurückblickt. Über 100 Begriffe aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum haben in diesem umfangreich bebilderten Werk zusammengefunden, ein Strong Buy für alle, die ohne digitale Omnipräsenz groß geworden sind oder einfach diese Zeit cool finden und sich vom Retrohype mitreißen lassen. Auf der Offline-DNA basiert auch das Kabarettprogramm "Fit mit Amalie", hier ist Marco vor allem Gagschreiber und Norbert vor allem Darsteller, dies mit mehreren Rollen: Amalie Kratochwill und Josef Hartlieb. Also sind wir drei für die Offline-Podcasts sogar zu fünft. In Folge 2: Videorekorder, Pornos, Kung Fu, Scream Queens, Diana Klein, Gemischtes Hack, Rapid vs. Austria, die Stadthalle, das Mühlwasser und die Kugel vom Schrecklichen Sven. https://www.kultur-im-kotter.at/sunshine-killer/ Norbert Peter am 17.6.: https://www.theatercenterforum.com/wechselwirkungen-2/ Norbert Peter am 18.6.: https://www.theatercenterforum.com/das-leben-der-amalie-kratochwil/ Offline, das Buch: zB. https://www.thalia.at/shop/home/artikeldetails/A1071822617 https://norbertpeter.at https://www.medizinkabarett.at Marco Seltenreich Börsepeople: https://audio-cd.at/page/podcast/6546 Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/apple http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify 2337 full no Christian Drastil Comm.
Wo sind die schönsten Läufe Deutschlands und was zeichnet sie aus? Franzi kennt unglaublich viele große und kleine Rennen, startet selber, filmt und fotografiert. Und sie hat die besten Tipps dafür, was ihr unbedingt ausprobieren solltet.Mit dem Camper müsst ihr natürlich nicht anreisen, doch dadurch ergibt sich so manche spannende Geschichte.Und nicht nur in Deutschland sondern auch in Kenia und NYC ist Franzi dabei. Eine Freizeitläuferin, die das Laufen und das Berichten darüber zu ihrem Beruf gemacht hat. Schaut gerne auch hier vorbei: https://www.instagram.com/franzi.ederseerunner/https://running-media.de/Und zu Norbert geht es hier: https://www.instagram.com/nwilhelmi/ Unsere Empfehlung für super schnelle Muskelregeneration und bei kleineren Wehwechen: https://feelslike.sport/janDas beste seit der Erfindung des Carbon-Schuhs. Einfach genial!!!Sucht euch gerne aus, ob ihr Franzis Code FRANZI10 oder meinen: laufenisteinfach nehmt.
I so enjoyed making this latest episode in my collaboration with G Henle Publishers. I talked with two absolute experts in their fields, Norbert Mülleman and Stefan Knüpfer, all about how to edit Ravel's music, and how to create the Ravel sound on the piano. This episode definitely veers into some very nerdy territory, but Norbert and Stefan are both so brilliant at explaining very high level concepts in a way that anyone can understand, from a person who has never looked at a score to a professional performer. I think everyone will learn a lot from this episode and I don't think you'll ever hear Ravel the same way again after listening! Enjoy!
You may know him best as the voice of Salem The Cat or Norbert from Sabrina The Teenage Witch and Angry Beavers but Nick Bakay is also the Writer/Producer who brought you Mom, King Of Queens, Paul Blart Mall Cop and Bookie. What does it take to sustain a multi-decade entertainment industry career? Versatility. Nick takes us deep into Sabrina lore with tales of the old-school imagineering of Salem Saberhagen, brought to us via several cats, puppeteers, animatronics, trainers and cat treats. A Buffalo, NY native, Nick's facility at performing, writing, and producing allowed him to create opportunities for himself that were both entertaining and rewarding. He's heard from a generation of young women who felt empowered by Sabrina to take on adult life, even without the benefit of witchcraft. Along with his pal Keven James, Nick went from writing on King Of Queens to creating Paul Blart: Mall Cops One and Two, and Zookeeper. And it was his writing chops that forged a connection with Chuck Lorre, providing Nick with an opportunity to write for Two And A Half Men and go on to helm nine seasons of Mom, HBO's Bookie and an upcoming Netflix sitcom, Leanne. Nick is also a household name to sports fan who see his work on ESPN. He was recently inducted into the Buffalo Broadcasting Hall Of Fame and, a Quick Buffalo Indulgence Warning: Nick and Weezy do get a little carried away waxing sentimental about their shared Buffalo roots. Fritz is using one of his sick days and his seat is kept warm by Weezy's radio buddies, Tom Murphy and Scott Paton. (They did occupy separate chairs, but you get the idea.) In recommendations--Weezy: Sirens on NetflixNick Bakay: Mr. Inbetween on FX and HuluPath Points of Interest:SirensMr. InbetweenNick Bakay - WikiNick Bakay - IMDBSabrina The Teenage WitchThe Angry BeaversBookieMomPaul Blart: Mall Cop 1Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2Salem SaberhagenWorld Famous Tom Murphy
Zusammen mit Norbert Rainer, Geschäftsführer von Klimabündnis OÖ, sprechen wir in dieser Folge darüber, wie man mit Klimaschutz Geld sparen kann, für wen das Klimabündnis aller ist und wie man mit Klimaschutz mehr Lebensqualität erhält.
What exactly does a Radio station Manger do? Your station does a mix of talk radio and music, why did you decide to have variety instead of just picking one theme? What id the difference between running a web based radio station and a terrestrial one? How many computers do you use to run your station? You have to get up so early to run your station, Is it worth it? All these questions and so much more will be answered by Norbert Miles the station manager of knit98 in El Paso Texas!! You can visit www.kint98.com and listen to his station every day!!!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-tiberius-show--3352195/support.
Thema: Die Amoktat in der Schule
Bár hétfőn elmaradt a Sokolébresztő a Tilos Rádióban, mi itt, a Parallaxis Univerzumban nem szerettük volna, hogy Sokolébresztő nélkül maradjatok. Ezért most egy különleges adást hoztunk el nektek a covid-időszakból: az eredetileg 2020. április 5-én bemutatott, eddig a csatornáinkon nem elérhető epizódban Werner Norbival beszélgettünk a mesterséges intelligencia és a robotika szerepéről az űrkutatás jövőjében – humanoid robotokról, autonóm űrszondákról és arról, vajon ki teszi meg az első lépést a Marson: ember vagy gép? https://parallaxis.blog.hu/2025/06/11/sokol_archiv https://youtu.be/MnKmKIcMry4 Patreon oldalunkon támogatóink számára a nyilvános premier előtt tesszük elérhetővé podcastjeink epizódjait, illetve a Parallaxis Podcast hosszabb, különleges változatát – akár már havi 1000 forintért! (a tájékoztatás nem teljes körű) https://www.patreon.com/parallaxis Adásainkat megtalálod többek között Spotify-on, Soundcloud- és YouTube-csatornánkon, valamint Google és Apple Podcasts-en is! Kattints és válassz platformot! https://parallaxis.blog.hu/2021/07/16/podcast_platformok Még több podcast a Parallaxis Univerzumban: http://podcast.emtv.hu
Thema: Die Amoktat in der Schule
08.06.2025 10:00: Norbert Rose - Gebunden, geliebt, versiegelt (Joh. 14, 15-27) - Gottesdienst
Father Ed Broom, OMV, serves as Associate Pastor at St. Peter Chanel Church in Hawaiian Gardens, California. He is a member of the Religious Order, Oblates of the Virgin Mary, and was ordained by Saint John Paul II in St Peter's Basilica on May 25, 1986. Fr. Ed is a Retreat Master and teaches Catholic […] The post ST. NORBERT appeared first on Fr. Ed Broom, OMV Oblates of the Virgin Mary.
Sirach 44, 45; Matthew 25: 14-23; Haydock Commentary
Acts 25: 13-21; John 21: 15-19; Haydock Commentary
June 6th, 2025: St Norbert - No Matter Your Past There Is Always Hope for Your Future; St Norbert - Reformer of the Clergy; St Norbert - Every Minute Is an Opportunity; Blessed Marriage; Mortal & Immortal Relationships; St Norbert - Even After Conversion You Can Still Learn Something
Friday of the Seventh Week of Easter Optional Memorial of St. Norbert, 1080-1134; founder of the Praemonstratensians or the Norbertines; his founding of the Order was a monumental task: combatting rampant heresies—particularly regarding the Blessed Sacrament, revitalizing many of the faithful who had grown indifferent and dissolute, plus effecting peace and reconciliation among enemies; reluctantly, Norbert became archbishop of Magdeburg in central Germany, a territory half pagan and half Christian; in this position he zealously continued his work for the Church until his death Office of Readings and Morning Prayer for 6/6/25 Gospel: John 21:15-19
Saints du jour 2025-06-06 Saint Norbert et Bienheureux Guillaume Greenwood by Radio Maria France
14 For even as a man going into a far country, called his servants, and delivered to them his goods;Sicut enim homo peregre proficiscens, vocavit servos suos, et tradidit illis bona sua. 15 And to one he gave five talents, and to another two, and to another one, to every one according to his proper ability: and immediately he took his journey.Et uni dedit quinque talenta, alii autem duo, alii vero unum, unicuique secundum propriam virtutem : et profectus est statim. 16 And he that had received the five talents, went his way, and traded with the same, and gained other five.Abiit autem qui quinque talenta acceperat, et operatus est in eis, et lucratus est alia quinque. 17 And in like manner he that had received the two, gained other two.Similiter et qui duo acceperat, lucratus est alia duo. 18 But he that had received the one, going his way digged into the earth, and hid his lord's money.Qui autem unum acceperat, abiens fodit in terram, et abscondit pecuniam domini sui. 19 But after a long time the lord of those servants came, and reckoned with them.Post multum vero temporis venit dominus servorum illorum, et posuit rationem cum eis. 20 And he that had received the five talents coming, brought other five talents, saying: Lord, thou didst deliver to me five talents, behold I have gained other five over and above.Et accedens qui quinque talenta acceperat, obtulit alia quinque talenta, dicens : Domine, quinque talenta tradidisti mihi, ecce alia quinque superlucratus sum. 21 His lord said to him: Well done, good and faithful servant, because thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will place thee over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.Ait illi dominus ejus : Euge serve bone, et fidelis : quia super pauca fuisti fidelis, super multa te constituam; intra in gaudium domini tui. 22 And he also that had received the two talents came and said: Lord, thou deliveredst two talents to me: behold I have gained other two.Accessit autem et qui duo talenta acceperat, et ait : Domine, duo talenta tradidisti mihi, ecce alia duo lucratus sum. 23 His lord said to him: Well done, good and faithful servant: because thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will place thee over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.Ait illi dominus ejus : Euge serve bone, et fidelis : quia super pauca fuisti fidelis, super multa te constituam; intra in gaudium domini tui.Archbishop of Magdeburg, he helped Pope Innocent II to triumph over the anti-pope Anecletus. He founded the Order of Premonstratensians, and he died A.D. 1134.
6 June 2025
Norbert war beim Wrestling und Dennis bei Thees Uhlmann. Irgendwie das Gleiche. Ausserdem reden wir ausführlich über die ersten Folgen von Last Of Us, feiern Tayloe Swift und bleiben stabil. Viel Spaß! P.S. am Ende hatten wir ein paar kleine technische Probleme, falls das alles bisschen komisch wirkt.
Acts 25:13-21 (Jesus, who was dead, but whom Paul asserted to be alive) Ezekiel 34:11-16 (I myself will be the shepherd of my sheep, and I myself will make them lie down)
The provided YouTube video transcript from Norbert "Bob" Gostischa, titled "80 and Counting - The Adventure You Didn't Know You Signed Up For," offers a humorous and insightful exploration of life after turning 80. It positions this milestone as entering a "secret society," acknowledging the physical and cognitive shifts that occur, such as slower processing speeds and increased energy conservation. However, the transcript emphasizes that advancing age also brings profound benefits, including improved emotional regulation, clearer perspective, and a heightened appreciation for time. Ultimately, it portrays the experience of being 80 and beyond as a journey filled with wisdom, humor, and a unique sense of freedom.This podcast was created using Google's LM Studio and is based on my video available at: https://youtu.be/F2snB4_-y48
SITE INTERNET : https://www.groupegambetta.fr/
2025. június 03., kedd 6:30-8 óra NÉVNAPOK, ESEMÉNYEK, SZÜLETÉSNAPOSOK, LAPSZEMLE, TŐZSDEI HELYZETKÉP BUDAPEST, TE CSODÁS: Hírek a fővárosból és környékéről Kíméletlen, 179 oldalas jelentés Budapest helyzetéről, így mehet csődbe a főváros Telex: Felmondhatja a főváros a vármegyebérlet-szerződést, hoppon maradhat az agglomeráció Telex: Karácsonyék elhatárolódnak a vármegyebérlet felmondásának ötletétől Telex: Demonstrációs és sztrájkbizottságot alakítanak a fővárosi önkormányzati cégek szakszervezetei, ha kell, a falig is elmennek Vége a fenyegetésnek, fellélegezhet az ócsai láperdő, nem válik zöld sivataggá Harcot hirdet a zuglói polgármester az utcán tárolt roncsautók ellen, Rózsa András nagytakarításra készül | BudaPestkörnyéke.hu Június 1-től emelkedtek a P+R parkolók díjai Budapesten - itt kell többet fizetniük az autósoknak | BudaPestkörnyéke.hu ÉBRESZTŐ TÉMA: A sas leszállt - Populista elnöke lesz Lengyelországnak A konzervatív Karol Nawrocki nyerte a lengyel elnökválasztást az ország nemzeti választási bizottságának hivatalos adatai szerint. Ezzel a 18 hónappal ezelőtt ellenzékbe szorult konzervatív Jog és Igazságosság (PiS) visszavágott az EU-párti, liberálisabb jobbközép Polgári Koalíció (KO) kormánykoalíciójának, amelynek élén Donald Tusk kormányfő áll. Mit hoz a lengyel választók döntése Európa számára? Telex: Mégis a konzervatív Nawrocki nyerte a lengyel elnökválasztást Zeöld Zsombor Lengyelország szakértő, a Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem doktorandusz hallgatója PULZUS: Az UV-védelemmel kapcsolatos ismereteket már kisgyermekkorban érdemes beépíteni a nevelési-oktatási programokba, annak érdekében, hogy a napvédelmi szokások minél előbb rögzüljenek. Prof. Dr. Wikonkál Norbert, az Észak-Pesti Centrumkórház- Honvédkórház főigazgatója, a Magyar Dermatológiai Társulat elnöke
SITE INTERNET : https://www.groupegambetta.fr/
Was ist der Sinn deines Lebens? In dieser tiefgründigen und ehrlichen Folge der Flowgrade Show spricht Max mit Unternehmer, Visionär und Gesundheitsvordenker Norbert Samhammer über die entscheidenden Fragen: Wie triffst du bessere Entscheidungen? Warum ist das Bauchgefühl oft der klügere Kopf? Und was passiert, wenn du einfach mal machst?Norbert Samhammer ist ein Mensch mit Erfahrung – und mit Tiefe. Vom erfolgreichen Unternehmer zum Gesundheitsgründer mit Mission. Er erzählt offen von persönlichen Krisen, unternehmerischen Wendepunkten und spirituellen Erkenntnissen.Es geht um den Mut zur Veränderung, die Kraft der Warum-Frage und die Fähigkeit, sich selbst ehrlich zu begegnen. Du erfährst, wie du mit kleinen Ritualen große Wirkung erzielst, was Manifestation wirklich bedeutet und warum Gesundheit, Beziehung und Berufung das magische Dreieck eines erfüllten Lebens bilden.► In dieser Episode erfährst du:- Wie du Entscheidungen mit dem Bauch UND dem Kopf triffst- Warum Manifestation oft der Beginn echter Veränderung ist- Wie du durch Rituale, Reflexion und Zielsetzung Klarheit gewinnst- Was Norbert über Beziehung, Trennung und Reife gelernt hat- Warum Geld neutral ist – und Verantwortung dabei entscheidend- Wie du deine Leidenschaft in ein sinnstiftendes Projekt verwandelst- Warum die junge Generation Gesundheit neu denken muss► Highlights„Gesundheit, Beziehung, Berufung – das ist mein Lebenskompass.“„Wenn du's fühlst – mach's. Und wenn du's nicht fühlst – lass es.“„Das Bauchgefühl ist kein Zufall, es ist gespeicherte Lebenserfahrung.“► Wer ist Norbert Samhammer?Unternehmer, Gründer von for you eHealth und ein echter Pionier, wenn es um die Verbindung von moderner Technologie mit ganzheitlicher Gesundheit geht. Nach dem Verkauf seiner erfolgreichen IT-Firma widmet er sich heute seiner Leidenschaft: Gesundheitsbewusstsein für alle zugänglich machen. Mit for you eHealth bietet er innovative Hometest-Kits zur präventiven Gesundheitsüberwachung – einfach, sicher und bequem von zu Hause. Norbert steht für ein neues Verständnis von Erfolg: bewusst, reflektiert und menschlich.Mehr dazu findest du hier► Erlebe Flow live beim FlowFest 2025 in München!Triff inspirierende Speaker wie Norbert Samhammer, entdecke die neuesten Tools für Gesundheit, Biohacking und Longevity – und finde deinen persönlichen Flow.
Teil 2 mit Norbert Oberhauser
Teil 1 unseres Talks mit Norbert Oberhauser - persönlich und ehrlich!
Teil 3 mit Norbert Oberhauser – das große Finale unserer dreiteiligen Gesprächsreihe
Josh Monday Christian and Conspiracy Podcast Ep. 254If you want to support the ministry: patreon.com/JoshMondayChristianandConspiracyPodcastJoin the Patreon here: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/Joshmonday_podcastIf you want to donate to the Ministry or Buy the Mug Here is our CashAPP: https://cash.app/$JoshmondaymusicNew affiliate: https://wsteif.com/ Sign up for Gold and Silver 7Kmetals: https://www.cocsilver.com/Flat Earth Books by Sakal Publishing Affiliate Link: https://booksonline.club/booksonlinecYoutube: @joshmondaymusicandpodcast Tips for the show to Support our Ministry: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/joshmondayCoffee Mug Is Available email me your mailing address Joshmonday@rocketmail.com Please subscribe to our Spotify and You Tube Channel Joshmondaymusic and Podcast and help us grow so we can keep on spreading the good news.To all of our current and future subscribers thank you for your time, we appreciate you. Please do us a favor subscribe to our You Tube Channel, hit that bell, share, like and comment below on our You tube. Please leave us a 5-Star review on Apple and Spotify.Check out my new show Sunday Service and Wednesday Brought to you by Cult of Conspiracy Podcast. On Cult of Conspiracy Spotify, Patreon and Apple Podcast Channel.Join the study as I go deep into the Bible. Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God Romands 10:17.This is a super important episode I work in the industry so I enjoyed it and I hope you do too. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/josh-monday-christian-and-conspiracy-podcast--6611118/support.
Tom McDonald reviews the latest Mission Impossible Film, John Cuddeback on stability in the home, and Fr. Norbert Jurek has our Sunday Gospel Reflection.
Do you pay attention to information printed on food labels? From eye-catching designs companies use to entice you to buy a product to nutrition facts panels to the tiny dates printed on packages. There's a lot going on to be sure. For policymakers, they hope that refining date labels on food packaging will help reduce the amount of uneaten food ending up in landfills. Food Waste is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. The Food and Drug Administration and the Food Safety and Inspection Service recently asked for public input on food date labels. So, we decided to gather some experts together to talk about this important policy tool. Roni Neff is a professor in the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Senior Advisor at the School's Center for a Livable Future. Her research looks at the intersection of food waste policy, climate change, and food system resilience. Brian Roe is a professor at the Ohio State University Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Developmental Economics. His work focuses on issues including agricultural marketing, information policy, behavioral economics, and product quality. Ruiqing Miao is an associate professor of agricultural economics and rural sociology at Auburn University's College of Agriculture. His research emphasizes sustainability, innovation, and decision making. Interview Summary Brian, let's begin with you and let's make sure everyone's on the same page. Can you talk to us a little bit about what date labels are and where they are on packaging. And what is industry required to include in terms of these date labels? Yes, so date labels, we see them anytime we pick up a food package. Most packages are going to have some type of date label on them. Oddly, federal law doesn't regulate these or really require these other than the exception of infant formula, which is the only federal requirement domain out there. But in the absence of federal regulation, states have kind of done their own thing. About 40 different states require date labels on at least some food products. And about 20 states prohibit or restrict the sale or donation of food past the label date. And even though states that require date labels, manufacturers can still choose the dates. There are no real regulations on them. So, recognizing that confusion over date labels can lead to unnecessary food waste, Government and industry actors have made, you know, some efforts to try to standardize date labeling language. But nothing terribly authoritative. Now, some states have introduced bills that seek to standardize date labels, with the motivation to try to get rid of and reduce food waste. California being perhaps the most recent of these. In 2024, they passed a bill that prohibits the use of any date label other than 'Best if Used By,' the phrase that goes along with foods where the date represents kind of a quality indicator. And then the phrase 'Use By,", if that date has some implications for product safety. The bill doesn't go into effect until July of '26, so we're going to see if this is going to create a domino effect across other states, across the food manufacturing center or even bubble up and be dealt with at the federal legislation level. Now, industries tried to do things before. Back in 2017, the Food Marketing Institute and the Grocers Manufacturers Association had a standardized date labeling suggestion that some firms bought into. FDA has given out some guidance about preferring 'Best if Used By' on certain food products to indicate quality. But again, we're all kind of waiting to see if there might be a federal legislation that kind of brings these state labels into check. Thanks, Brian. And it's really important to know about the policy landscape and the fact that there hasn't been a federal policy across all foods. And it's interesting to see the efforts of, say, in California. I think this begs the question; how do consumers actually process the information of date labels? This fascinated us too. A very clever person at Ohio State that I work with, Dr. Aishwarya Badiger, led a study I was part of. We enlisted consumers to come into the Consumer Evaluation Lab that we have here on campus and evaluate samples of milk. They were presented with the label of each milk. We gave them a little glass with a nose full of the milk that they could sniff. So, they're looking at the date label, they're given the sample they could smell, and then we kind of asked them, Hey, if this were in your fridge, would you keep it or toss it? But the entire time we actually had them fitted with special glasses that precisely track their eye movements so we could understand kind of which information they were looking at while they went through the whole process of evaluating and then making their decision. Consumers overwhelmingly looked at the date itself on the package and largely ignored the phrase or the words that go along with the date. In fact, for more than half of the evaluations, the consumer's eyes never went anywhere near the phrase. This is important. And actually, we'll talk about that a little bit more with some of our other guests. So, what are the implications of date label policies? So the eye tracking research really drove home to me that dates are much more salient than phrases. Although all the policies largely deal with the phrases. Dates give you actionable information. People can look at the date on the label, look at the calendar, and man, that's something they can do something about. They can act based upon that. The phrases are a little bit more ambiguous as Roni will talk about later. I think that people have a hard time interpreting what those phrases really mean. That doesn't mean we should not try to unify those phrases, but rather this is going to be a longer-term investment in educational infrastructure that until those phrases really become salient and actionable to consumers. And then become more of a critical component of the policies. But right now, policies are generally silent on dates. And dates seem to be the real action mover. Yeah. So why don't we just get rid of all of this? What would be the implications? Yes. We did this experiment too. Same kind of setup. Had people come in, they had the jug of the milk in front of them. They had a glass of milk that they could sniff. Same thing. And we had a bunch of different milks. We had some that were only like 15 days post pasteurization. Some that went out to like 40 days past pasteurization. So, the youngest or the freshest had about three days, quote unquote, left on its date label. The 40-day old milk was like two or three weeks past the date. And we did two things. We had them evaluate the milk with the dates on the jugs, and then we had ones where we took the dates and the labels off the milk. Not surprisingly, when they did not have the dates on the milk, they were much more likely to say that they would keep the milk. Even that 40-day old milk, about half of them said, yeah, I'd drink this. I'd keep this if it were in my fridge. But it wasn't a slam dunk. So, our youngest and freshest milk had an odd flavor note. You know, sometimes as the seasons change, feed sources change for cattle, you get an odd flavor note. It's not spoilage, it's just a slightly different note. And when people have the date label, they were much more willing to give that milk a second chance and say that they would keep it. But if the date label wasn't on there, they took that odd flavor note and said, I'm going to toss this milk. So, it's really kind of a nuanced thing. And if you would take those off, I think you're going to get some consumers who are going to kind of freak out without any guidance. And they might have kind of an itchy trigger finger when it comes to throwing away that milk or other products. So, it's compelling. We've seen England, the UK, do this; take dates off of certain products. But I would probably want to see a little more example of how consumers are responding to that before I fully endorse that as kind of a policy movement forward. Brian, thank you for that. And I have got to say, I was not expecting to have a conversation about the bouquet of a glass of milk. But this is really an interesting finding, and it does help us understand some other things that we're going to talk about. Roni, I want to turn our attention to you. And I know you are someone who's been involved in understanding date labels for a while. And I really appreciate it and I've said it before, but you're the reason I got into this work. I want to understand a little bit more about what are important things to understand about the misconceptions that consumers may have about food date labels? And why does it matter for policymakers? Well, I'll start with just saying that conceptions are what we know rationally. And it's not the whole picture because as Brian was alluding to a lot of our decision making is going on in our emotions. And like I can tell my son all day long the fact that that milk is okay, he's going to toss it because he doesn't trust it. There's a lot more going on than conceptions. But I want to talk about two misconceptions. The first one is that despite what Brian just said about the fact that these date labels other than infant formula aren't federally regulated, about two in five people think that they are. We just did a national consumer survey in January 2025, and this is one of the findings. And I did that along with Emily Broad Lieb from the Harvard Food Law and Policy Project and Akif Khan also from there, and then Dana Gunders from ReFED. And in addition to this idea that they're federally regulated, I'll say that these kinds of beliefs were most common among those who were 18 to 34, parents with children under age 18, and black and Hispanic consumers. Our earlier work also found that those who think that food date labels are federally regulated are more likely to discard food based on them. All this speaks to a real challenge. And, you know, it kind of makes sense, like if you see something and you trust it, that it's from the federal government. And of course, we all trust the federal government these days. If you trust it, then you're going to respond to it. So that's an implication for food policy. And then the next thing we did also is that we tested understanding of five different food date label phrases: a date with no text, and then two of those phrases accompanied by icon images. And since none of these actually have a federally recognized meaning the correct answer for all of them in terms of the meaning is like other. But we also accepted answers that were aligned with that voluntary industry standard, just to kind of see how people were perceiving it. And, across all of these labels, only an average of 53% of people answered correctly about what these labels meant. Now, consumers were pretty good at identifying 'Best if Used By' as a quality label. But the real challenge comes in with 'Use By' which under the voluntary industry standards should be a safety label. And more people thought it was a quality label than thought it was a safety label; 44% versus 49%. And so, we need to clear up these misconceptions in support of food safety, in support of food waste prevention. But in order to do that, we need to be able to tell people clearly what the labels mean. And we can't really do that if there's no standardized meaning of what they mean. So, we really need a national standard, and that is the policy implication. Thank you for that. And I know Ruiqing and I have done some work in this space and in part learning from what you all have done. I'm interested because you mentioned the 2025 survey, but of course you also mentioned the 2016 survey. Are there any big shifts or anything that you want to tell us about changes that you see from those two different surveys? We asked a number of the same or almost identical questions in those two surveys. And since that time, we've adopted a voluntary industry standard and there's been a lot of education and communication about wasted food. And yet in our survey we actually found that things were going in the wrong direction. Consumer misunderstandings of date labels increased. Those who quote always or usually discard food based on the label: in 2016, that was 37%, and this year it was 43%. And then in terms of belief that these are federally regulated: in 2016 it was 36% and now it's 44%. We're going in the wrong direction despite all these activities, and I don't know why. I think for those who are looking for future research questions, this would be a really interesting one. This is really disturbing because all of the information that's come out about date labels. I thought people would understand this. And that this is where we would be in a different place. So, this work is really important. So, how did people's response to date labels vary by food item? Did you see any differences? Because this is something that comes up often that people may be more responsive to some food products versus others? Yeah, indeed. We asked about five different foods, and we showed a bunch of different labels for each food. And the responses did vary both based on the item and based on what label was on it. And I'll start with where caution is needed. Deli meats are one example of where we really want people to pay attention to that label. And while there's no federal standard that label's the best piece of information people has, so they should use it. And we found that only 65% would throw out the deli meat before, on, or just after the 'Use By' label. And the number of people that would respond to it reduced with other labels that were used, and older adults were most likely to disregard those labels. And they may be particularly vulnerable in terms of foodborne illness. So that's when lack of caution leads to risk. On the other hand, when caution leads to waste, we looked at raw chicken, pasteurized milk, lettuce, and breakfast cereal. And for all of those there, like the label is really only telling you about quality, and consumers should use their senses to decide, and knowledge of how that was, stored to decide whether to eat it. And so, the most common out of all five foods, including the deli, the one that they responded the strongest to was raw chicken. And that chicken can be contaminated as we know, but if you cook it, you're killing those bacteria, so it's okay. And averaging across all those different date labels, we found 54% would discard these four foods based on the date. And the piece that was most striking to me was that for breakfast cereal, 43% said they were discarded based on the date. So, we've got some education to do. Yeah. In the earlier paper I did with colleagues at Cornell, we used breakfast cereal and we were surprised to see how much people willing to throw away breakfast cereal if it were passed to date. There is confirmation and we see this happen in many other products. And we'll definitely talk about some of those product differences with Ruiqing. The last question I'd like to ask you is you found that many consumers thought they knew the meanings of the various food date labels, but they were incorrect. And in some of the work that you've done in the past, you found that many people answered incorrectly even after viewing information about the labels. So even when you educated folks or gave people information, they still made incorrect choices. Why do you think this is, and what should we do about it? And some people's responses do improve when you show them the information, but it was striking in that study that seconds after having read the definition, according to the voluntary industry standard, people were giving the wrong answer. Even though they had previously said that they thought they understood it. So, to me, this suggests that they already think they know the answer and so they're not tuning in. And this speaks to a real challenge that we're going to have when we do standardize these date labels. How are we going to reach people and capture their attention. Like, if we just change the policy, that does nothing. We've got to reach people and we've got to do it in a sophisticated and well-planned way. And I think the education should also emphasize that misunderstandings are common because that might be something that would help wake people up. But beyond that, we've got to capture their attention. So, you know, dancing clowns, whatever it is that wakes people up. I have a fear of clowns, so I'm not sure if I want that as a policy recommendation. However... For the deli meats we want you to be afraid, so it's okay. Yes, I agree. I agree. One of the things that this conversation has helped us see is that there's some real concerns around whether or not people are paying attention to the label. Or there may be paying more attention to the dates. And even when people are taught or encouraged to think about the dates, there seems to be a mismatch. And Ruiqing, I want to now turn to you because one of the things in the study that we were a part of, there's some questions about differences among people. So, in the paper that we recently published on the relationship between date labels and anticipated food waste, and people's individual orientation to risk and loss, can you tell us a little bit about what some of the key findings of that paper are? Right. So, the paper is published recently in Applied Economics Perspective Policy. It's one of the official journals of Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA). Norbert is the leading author. So, this paper built on the framework of prospect theory and is based on the data from a series of experiments we conducted in Alabama and also the state of New York. We find that consumers do adjust their anticipated food waste by date labels and by how much they tolerate risk and losses. In the experiment, we particularly measured their tolerance to risk and losses. We found that the 'Use By' date labels tend to lead to more anticipated food waste than 'Best Buy'. Maybe this echo what Roni has said. So, people may tend to link 'Use By' with quality and food safety. We also found that the consumers with low tolerance to losses and are associated with higher anticipated foot waste regardless of date labels and the products. So, we can see a heterogeneity of the responses of different consumers to date labels and food items based on their tolerance to losses and risks. Thank you for that. And I think this is a really important aspect of looking at this set of studies because we see that people are different. They respond differently. And they have different ideas about how they handle losses. This idea that it can be worse to lose a hundred dollars versus to gain a hundred dollars. Or the way we understand how we'll negatively respond versus how positively we respond. Using this economic framework of prospect theory, something that is drawn from actually the psychology literature to better understand how people react to food labels while shopping. What are some key features of this approach to explaining people's behaviors and why do you think it's a good choice? Why do you think it's important to do this? One of the key features of prospect theory is it divides the possible outcomes of a risky event into two domains. One is a gain domain and one is a loss domain. So, in terms of the food consumption, probably the most likely status quo is do not eat the food items. So, the gain domain might be gaining nutrition from the food item. The loss domain might be the loss of health if the food item is bad. So, I think this framework fits particularly well to describe the consumer's trade off in their mind when they face a food item with a date label that is maybe one day or two days past the expiration date. So, one possibility is you consume this food. If it is good, you get nutrition and if it is bad, you potentially get lost health or lose one day of work or so on. So, I think this model can capture the trade off or the decision-making procedure in a consumer's mind pretty well. And experiments data support the theoretical prediction that loss aversion may affect people's food waste decisions. Thank you for that. And I think what's one of the sort of take home messages that I've learned out of this process is this heterogeneity, the fact that people are different and may respond differently to these date labels, really does put the onus upon policymakers to think critically what date labels, if we were to use them, or if we think they have an effect, which are the right ones. And so I actually want to open up the question to all of you. In your view, what next steps make sense for date labels to help address the food waste challenges that we see in this country? Let's start with you, Brian. Ooh, yeah. So, to me a compelling issue that needs to be addressed is how do we get 'Use By' to really translate to be people to be about safety? Is it a different color? I know we don't want to mess with the phrases, but do we just call this safety date and put it in red or put a clown by it if that scares you. Something along those lines to make that stand out. And then on the relevance side, I think it might be out of policy, but perhaps, industry collaboration to really push printed dates to the end of that quality horizon. So that everybody has confidence that they're not going to get undercut by somebody else having an earlier date printed for cereals or for canned goods or something like that. To have a kind of a truce among commercial interests to say, okay, typically canned beans, has this type of 180 days or 360 days. Let's push it to the end of that acceptable horizon so that we don't have unwarranted waste happening as often. Those are two ideas that I've kind of chewed on a lot and think could be positive steps forward. But I'm fascinated to hear what others think. Thank you, Brian and I really don't like the idea of putting clowns anywhere near this. I want to go to you, Roni. All right, well first, I'll a thousand percent echo everything that Brian just said. And I'll note also in terms of the 'Use By' date, the label that was most commonly associated with food safety was 'Expires On' by consumers. But that isn't part of what has been under [policy] discussion. But anyway, in addition to echoing that, I'll just say we do need a standardized policy and it has to be accompanied by a well-designed education campaign. And this policy change, it's just a no-brainer. It's not controversial. It's fairly minimal cost. And given the high food prices and the struggles that consumers are having right now, they need every tool that they can to save money and food, and this is one of them. Great. Thank you, Roni. I'll give the last word to you, Ruiqing. Yeah. I will echo what Brian and Roni said. So, a well-designed policy and public education campaign. Particularly for the education campaign. I think regardless of if there is a policy change or not, I think it is time to do a public education campaign. Norbert, we have done the research on food waste for almost nine years, right? So, I learned a little bit about the date label's meaning. But still, I cannot change my wife's opinion. When she sees sell by yesterday for the milk, she would suggest we throw it away. But I said this is not for us, this is for sellers. But she wouldn't believe so because I cannot persuade her. But maybe an education campaign from more authoritative institutional federal government can change people's mind as a researcher or like even husband cannot change. Roni - And can I just add to that, just please. I think that the economics and psychology expertise that all of you have can really contribute to that. Because I think that's a really important point that you're making. And it's not just factual, it's emotional too. And so how do we, you know, get in there and change what people do beyond their knowledge? Bios Roni Neff is a Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health's Department of Environmental Health & Engineering and the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, an academic center focused on food systems and public health. Her research focuses on wasted food through the lens of equity and public health. She is a co-Director of the RECIPES national food waste research network, and she recently served on the National Academies of Science and Medicine consensus panel on consumer food waste. Brian Roe is the Van Buren Professor in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics at Ohio State University. Roe has worked broadly in the areas of agricultural and environmental economics focusing on issues including agricultural marketing, information policy, behavioral economics and product quality. He was recently named as a fellow of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association and has previously served as an editor for the Association's flagship journal, the American Journal of Agricultural Economics. He currently leads the Ohio State Food Waste Collaborative, a collection of researchers, practitioners, and students working together to promote the reduction and redirection of food waste as an integral part of a healthy and sustainable food system, and co-leads the RECIPES Network, a National Science Foundation Sustainable Regional System's Research Network focused on increasing food system sustainability, resilience and equity by addressing the issue of food waste. In addition to research on food waste, his other recent research includes a USDA funded project focused on local foods and school lunch programs and participation in an NSF-funded multidisciplinary team seeking to understand human-ecosystem feedbacks in the Western Lake Erie basin, including understanding how farms and agribusinesses respond to voluntary environmental programs and how Ohio residents respond to different options to manage Lake Erie water quality. Ruiqing Miao is an agricultural economist at Auburn University. Miao is interested in sustainability, innovation, and decision-making. His research focuses on the interaction between agricultural production and its environment, aiming to understand and quantify 1) agriculture's impact on land use, water use, water quality, and biodiversity, and 2) how agricultural production is affected by farmers' behaviors, public policies, agricultural innovation, technology adoption, and climate change.
Mark and Norbert discuss the infamous 1992 sequel Alien 3. Directed by David Fincher, and starring Sigourney Weaver, Charles Dance, Charles S. Dutton, and a super fast xenomorph, the movie focuses on what happens when a xenomorph runs amok inside an isolated prison. In this episode, they also talk about director's cuts, troubled productions, and the Alien franchise.
Am 8. Mai 1945 wurden die Waffen niedergestreckt, mit der bedingungslosen Kapitulation war das nationalsozialistische Deutschland besiegt. Sechs Jahre hatte der Zweite Weltkrieg gedauert. Nach Kriegsende, nach dem Holocaust, millionenfachem Mord in Gaskammern war alles zerstört: Großstädte, menschliche Seelen, Strukturen. Wie war der politische Neuanfang möglich? Der Historiker Norbert Frei beschäftigt sich seit Jahrzehnten mit den Verbrechen der deutschen NS-Vergangenheit, immer wieder aus unterschiedlichsten Perspektiven. Gerade erschienen ist sein jüngstes Buch "Einreden. Zu Zeitgeschichte und Zeitgenossenschaft". Auch darüber wird Norbert Frei in NDR Kultur à la carte mit Janek Wiechers sprechen.
04.05.2025 10:00: Norbert Rose - Irdisches Konzert mit himmlischer Berufung (Offb. 14, 1-5) - Gottesdienst
Norbert from Wisconsin Rapids wanted the breakdown: What's the difference between a Cardinal Bishop, Cardinal Priest, and Cardinal Deacon? Patrick’s Explanation: 1. Cardinal Bishops: -These are the most senior cardinals. -They hold titular jurisdiction over ancient dioceses called the "suburbicarian sees" around Rome: places like Ostia and Porto. -They're not the real working bishops of those dioceses, more like honorary guardians. -Seniority here isn’t just about age; it’s about how long you’ve been a cardinal. 2. Cardinal Priests: Rome’s Titular Pastors -These cardinals are linked to one of Rome’s ancient churches. -It’s honorary, but each one is assigned a "titular church" to symbolize their bond with the diocese of Rome. 3. Cardinal Deacons: -Historically, these guys were the ones running the Church’s day-to-day in Rome. -After 10 years, a Cardinal Deacon can be "promoted" to Cardinal Priest. So… Are These Ranks Like Holy Orders? Nope! These don’t mean “holier” or “more sacramentally powerful.” This ranking is about honor and duty, not sacramental hierarchy. Bonus Wisdom: -The word "cardinal" comes from Latin cardo, meaning hinge.These are the “hinge men”: the inner circle who support the Pope and, when the time comes, elect the next one. As the Church preps for the conclave, Patrick reminds us: Stay close to Relevant Radio for all the upcoming news of the Conclave. Pray with us every evening at 7:00 PM CT for the Family Rosary Across America for the needs of the Church and for our leaders. You can hear the funeral coverage for Pope Francis Saturday morning at 2:50 AM CT and rebroadcasted at 12:00 PM CT later in the day on Relevant Radio.
Mark and Norbert talk about their favorite Tom Cruise running scenes. Mark rewatched every Tom Cruise film from Endless Love (1981) to Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning (2023), and found 295 running moments from 38 of his films. In this episode, they discuss their 10 favorite running scenes from Collateral, Risky Business, Mission: Impossible, Far and Away, and Edge of Tomorrow.
Patrick takes questions about honoring the sacred spaces of Catholic churches, explains the responsibilities and requirements of godparents, and clarifies what truly sets the Catholic faith apart. Patrick explains why secular concerts like those featuring the music of Queen and ABBA are not appropriate in the sanctuary, sets the record straight on the role of godparents, and addresses common misconceptions about other Christian groups. This episode is full of practical guidance and real answers for Catholics facing modern challenges. Cheryl - A Catholic Church in my town is hosting a secular string quartet tribute to Abba and Queen. Is that okay? (00:48) Bryce - What are the duties of a Catholic godparent to a Protestant child? (08:45) Norbert (email) - Can you please explain to me difference between the Cardinals? (17:30) Jessica - A friend of mine is planning a concert and the priest said he could do it in the Church. I am trying to talk him out of it. Do you have a book recommendation about Popes and the Church? (23:20) John - If a Catholic is married to a Protestant, can they be the godparents of a Catholic baptized child? (27:25) Richard (email) - I know I have to come to confession, but I am embarrassed by all the porn, stealing, lying, etc. things that have separated me from Jesus. (31:52) Ana (email) – What is the difference between The Episcopal Church and our Catholic Church? Is there such a thing as a “Lutheran Catholic”? (40:42) Monica - After each round of voting in the Conclave, are the results given or is it completely blind throughout the process? (46:40) Joseph - I just got a bible from a protestant and I was wondering if it is something I should keep? (50:02)
This week, Anna speaks with Lasha Antadze, co-founder of Rarilabs and Rarimo, about the evolution of digital identity systems. Lasha shares his journey from working with government eID systems to building decentralized identity solutions using zero-knowledge proofs. The conversation explores how Rarimo is taking a fundamentally different approach to identity verification by keeping all processing client-side, from passport scanning to biometric verification. This enables new use cases like censorship-resistant voting systems and privacy-preserving account recovery, while avoiding the traditional pitfalls of centralized identity providers. The discussion also covers the challenges of building trust in cryptographic systems, the potential applications of client-side ZK proofs for AI governance, and how Rarimo is working to make identity tools that are both powerful and accessible to everyday users. This episode provides a fascinating look at how zero-knowledge proofs are reshaping our understanding of digital identity and privacy. Further reading: On-Chain Reputation & Identity Building with Sismo Coordinating Provers with Norbert from ZkCloud STORK 2.0 eIDAS Freedomtool Account recovery demo at Denver Spots for zkSummit13 are limited - grab your ticket at www.zksummit.com! Missing Link are a talent team built for the Web3 era, helping projects across the ecosystem connect with the right candidates at the right time. Whether you're an established project or a startup searching for specialized talent, Missing Link can help. Visit their website at missing-link.io. **If you like what we do:** * Find all our links here! @ZeroKnowledge | Linktree * Subscribe to our podcast newsletter * Follow us on Twitter @zeroknowledgefm * Join...
If your voice has ever felt silenced, stifled, or swallowed by shame—this episode is your invitation to get it back. Norbert Elnar, speaker and vocal empowerment coach, joins me to dig deep into how your body, trauma, and social conditioning all shape the way you speak—and how you can get back to the truth of your voice. We don't just talk about public speaking technique here. We talk about what it means to feel safe taking up space, what it looks like to embody your sound, and why your voice is so much more than just the words you say. Norbert shares how reclaiming his own voice led him to help others speak with soul, clarity, and confidence—on stage and off. Whether you're an aspiring speaker or a seasoned one ready to unlock a new level of resonance and power, this episode is a must-listen. In this episode, you'll learn: Why voice is not just a skill, but a connection to your inner truth How trauma and shame disconnect us from our vocal power—and how to begin healing Practical ways to tap into your breath and body to speak with presence, power, and authenticity Key Moments: 8:12 – How Norbert's own voice journey shaped his method for helping others 17:44 – Releasing tension and vocal blocks through somatic awareness 29:50 – A radical reframe: What if your voice didn't need to be “fixed”? Main takeaway: You don't need to “sound like a speaker” to be a powerful one. You need to sound like you. Let this episode be your permission slip to stop performing and start embodying your voice. About Norbert Elnar Norbert Elnar is a seasoned Brand Strategist, Graphic Designer, and thought leader in Kingdom branding. With over a decade of experience bridging mainstream advertising with ministry, Norbert empowers entrepreneurs to build brands that tell compelling stories, resonate with their audiences, and achieve their God-given potential. His flagship tool, the Kingdom Brand Compass Framework, is the foundation of the Kingdom Brand-Building Course, an on-demand program that demystifies branding while fostering purpose-driven success. Through this framework, Norbert has helped numerous business owners turn unclear ideas into clear, God-honoring brands that thrive in competitive markets. Connect with Norbert Elnar http://www.masterpiecebrands.com https://www.instagram.com/norbertelnar/ https://www.facebook.com/norbert.elnar About Aleya Harris Aleya Harris is the spark for your spark™. A trailblazer in purpose-driven story crafting, she is a marketing executive and ex-Google Vendor Partner who brings her dynamic experience to her role as the CEO of The Evolution Collective Inc. Aleya is an international award-winning speaker, the founder and lead trainer of Spark the Stage ™, and the host of the award-winning Flourishing Entrepreneur Podcast. She is also the author of the bestselling book Spark the Stage: Master the Art of Professional Speaking and Authentic Storytelling to Captivate, Inspire, and Transform Your Audience. Her unique approach as a Strategic Storytelling Consultant has revolutionized the way businesses communicate, transforming workplace cultures and market positioning. With her dynamic energy and proven methodologies, Aleya guides clients to unlock their potential, articulate their radically authentic stories, and achieve unparalleled success. Watch the Free Masterclass Join Aleya's free masterclass "Build Unstoppable Confidence and Book Speaking Gigs Without Feeling Like an Impostor." Discover the proven framework to own your story, captivate audiences, and land speaking gigs—even if you've doubted your worth or have no experience on stage. Register at https://www.aleyaharris.com/masterclass Buy the Book Aleya's bestselling book will help you become a more confident and authentic professional public speaker. Buy Spark the Stage: Master the Art of Professional Speaking and Authentic Storytelling to Captivate, Inspire & Transform Your Audience on Amazon or anywhere books are sold. Buy the Book: https://a.co/d/1T4EoJ7 Sign Up for Spark the Stage™ Spark the Stage™ is an online course and 12-month group coaching program that helps entrepreneurs and executives become radically authentic professional public speakers who can confidently deliver a compelling Radical Spark Signature Talk™ from the stage. Enroll at https://www.aleyaharris.com/spark Work with Aleya to Craft a Better Story An unclear strategy, confusing brand, or undefined workplace culture will repel ideal clients, visibility opportunities, and career-making connections. The Evolution Collective Inc. transforms disconnected teams and overwhelmed leaders into thriving, inclusive cultures through Radically Authentic Strategic Storytelling. Schedule a call at https://www.evolutioncollective.com/ Book Aleya to Speak To book Aleya to edutain your audience at your next event as a keynote speaker, please visit www.aleyaharris.com/speaking to check out her speaking topics, reels, and why. Click "Schedule a Call" to secure the speaker with "that something new" you've been looking for. Connect with Aleya Harris Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aleyaharris/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aleyaharris/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thealeyaharris
As any parent knows, it is really important to help our children to make healthy food choices. I know as a father who cooks for my child, it is really critical that I introduce her to fruits and vegetables and encourage whole grains and try to manage the amount of additional sugars, but it's hard. We do this with the goal of trying to make sure that our child is able to eat healthy once she leaves the home. That she's able to make healthy choices there. But it's not just about the future. My child is making choices even today at school and outside of school, and the question is, can we help her make those choices that are going to lead to healthy food outcomes? Do food labels on products encourage children to make healthy food choices if it indicates good ingredients? Or would labels that warn against nutrients of concern actually discourage kids from using those or consuming those products? Today we're going to actually explore those questions in a particular context- in Chile. In 2016, the Chilean government implemented a comprehensive set of obesity prevention policies aimed at improving the food environment for children. Last year on this podcast, we actually explored how the Chilean food laws affected school food purchases. But now today, we're going to explore how food labels are influencing youth outside of school. It is my pleasure to welcome back my colleagues, Gabriela Fretes, who is an associate research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute, or IFPRI; and Sean Cash, who is an economist and chair of the Division of Agriculture, food and Environment at Tufts University at the Friedman School of Nutrition, Science and Policy. Interview Summary Gabi and Sean, I'm excited to discuss our new paper, Front of Pack Labels and Young Consumers an Experimental Investigation of Nutrition and Sustainability Claims in Chile that was recently published in a Journal of Food Quality and Preference. Gabi, let's begin with you. So why look at Chile? Can you explain the focus of the Chilean labeling and food environment policies there? So, the setting of our study, as in the previous study, was Chile because recently the country implemented the law of food labeling and advertising, which includes three main components. The first one being mandatory front of package warning labels on packaged goods and beverages. The second one being restrictions on all forms of food marketing directed to children younger than 14 years. So, including printed media, broadcast, and also all digital media. And the third component being at school regulations at different levels including preschool, elementary, and high school levels. Briefly, food manufacturers in Chile must place front of package labels on packaged foods or beverages that are high in specific nutrients of concern, including added sugars, saturated fats, sodium, and or energy. This law was implemented in three stages, starting in June 2016. The last stage was implemented in June 2019. So, it has been already six or seven years since the full implementation of the regulation. Specifically talking about the school component because this, yeah, it relates to children and adolescents. The law mandates that foods and beverages with at least one front of pack warning label cannot be sold, promoted, or marketed inside schools. And this includes the cafeteria, the school kiosks, and even events that are happening inside the schools. And additionally, food and beverages that have at least one front pack warning label cannot be offered as part of school meal programs. In addition to this front of pack warning label regulation, Chile also implemented voluntary eco labels starting in 2022 that provide information about the recyclability of food packages specifically. There is a certification process behind this labeling regulation and the eco label can be displayed if the food or beverage package is at least 80% recyclable. Wow. This is a really comprehensive set of policies to encourage healthier food choices, both at the school and then also outside of the school. I'm excited to discuss further what this may do to food choices among children. Sean, that really brings up the question, why is it important to look at young consumers and their food choices and what makes them unique compared to adults? Thanks for asking Norbert. This is an area where I've been interested in for a while. You know, young consumers play a crucial role in shaping the demand for food and long-term dietary habits. And young consumers might be more open to incorporating dietary advice into those long-term habits than adults might be. Just perhaps kids are less set in their ways. Children and adolescents are both current, but also future consumers with growing autonomy in what they choose around food as they get older. To marketers, we sometimes would say they might represent a three-in-one market. First, they spend their own money on snacks. What you could think of as the primary market. And how children spend money autonomously is really something that hasn't been studied enough by researchers. Although it's an area where I have tried to make a contribution. Second, kids influence household purchases. This is sometimes called pester power. You can think of a kid in the supermarket begging a parent to buy a favorite snack or a certain brand of cereal. But this can also be more socially positive in that kids might be agents of change within their households. Encouraging perhaps other family members to buy healthier food items if they get more interested in that. And third, this three-in-one market is rounded out by the fact that children represent future purchasing power as future adults. So, the habits that they're forming now might influence what they do when they're older. Despite this importance for marketers, but also for pro-social behavior change, there really hasn't been a lot of research on youth food purchasing behaviors. And this question that we are looking at here of how kids might respond to front to package labels has been particularly limited. In this project, we wanted to understand how Chilean adolescents might respond both to nutrition warning labels, but also eco labels, and how they consider price when choosing snacks. We were lucky to be able to recruit a sample of over 300 kids, aged 10 to 14, to participate in these experiments. I know we're going to chat a bit more about what we found, but in general, our results suggest that while price is perhaps the biggest factor in explaining what the kids chose in our experiment, that some of these youth showed preferences for the eco labels, which could be indicative of an emerging interest in sustainability issues. But overall, understanding these behaviors is really important because the food choices made during childhood and adolescence can persist in adulthood. And this can be really something that helps change long-term health outcomes. Gabi, let's talk a little bit more about eco labels for a moment. What are they, and how do these echo labels influence children's snack choices? What did they tell us about their awareness of sustainability? That's a great question, Norbert. Thanks. In our study specifically, we found that eco labels, had a greater influence on adolescents' snack choices than nutrition warning labels these black and white octagons that are displayed on the front of the package of products in Chile. And this suggests that some young consumers are becoming more aware of environmental issues, or at least in our sample. One possible explanation for this could be that eco labels suggest positive emotions rather than warnings, as with the nutrition labels. Which might feel more restrictive. Unlike the nutrition labels that tell consumers what not to eat, eco labels, on the other hand, highlight a product's benefits, making it more appealing. This could be one of the reasons. Related to that, adolescents may also associate eco-friendly products with social responsibility aligning with increasing youth-driven environmental movements that are very prevalent around the world. However, not all adolescents in our sample responded equally to the eco labels that were presented to them in the snacks. Our study specifically found that those who receive pocket money were more likely to choose eco label snacks. And this could be possibly because they have more autonomy over their purchases and their personal values could be playing a bigger role in their choices. If eco labels are really influencing children and adolescents with choices, one intervention that could be potentially beneficial could be to incorporate sustainability messaging in school food and nutrition education in order to reinforce those positive behaviors. And make them part of the daily food choices that they make. In making sustainable food more affordable, government incentives or retailer promotions could encourage youth to choose more eco-friendly snacks. Given that price, as we saw in our study, remains a key factor for choice. Lastly, not all eco labels are created equal. And this suggests that clear standardization and regulation are needed to prevent misleading claims. And ensure that adolescents receive accurate information about the sustainability of their food choices. Ultimately, the eco labeling, of course, is not a silver bullet. It's not going to solve all the environmental issues, but it represents a promising tool to nudge consumers. So our better dietary and environmental behaviors. Gabi, you talked about how the eco labels have a bigger effect than nutrition warning. And overall, the nutrition warning labels didn't really have that big of an effect on snack food choices. Why do you think that's the case? Yes, this was really one surprising finding in our study. That front of pack nutrition warning labels did not significantly impact children's and adolescents' snack choices. And this kind of contradicts some previous research suggesting that warning labels can help consumers make healthcare choices. And there are several possible explanations for why this could be happening. The first one could be just lack of interest. So compared to adults, children and adolescents may be just more responsive to positive rather than negative messaging. Because negative messages related to nutrition might not seem relevant to them because they feel healthy in the present. They just are not interested in those kinds of messages. The second could be label fatigue. We discuss this in our paper and basically it is because Chile's regulation was already introduced in 2016. Given that it has been already some time since implementation, young consumers may have become habituated to seeing the warning labels on food products. So, like how adults also experience label fatigue, and this is documented in the evidence, children and adolescents might no longer pay attention or pay less attention to the warning. Third possible explanation is it relates to taste and brand loyalty. For this point, research shows that for youth specifically, taste remains the top priority when they choose food. So often outweighing any other factors including health concerns. If a favorite snack, for example, has warning labels but remains tasty and familiar to the kid, the label alone may not discourage them from choosing that snack. And lastly, social and environmental factors. Our study found, as we already mentioned, that eco labels had a stronger influence that nutrition warnings, and this could indicate that children and adolescents are just more responsive to messages about sustainability than to warnings, which they may perceive as less immediate. Thank you for sharing that. And at this moment in the US there is a conversation about front of pack labels. And the work that you are showing in this paper may even point to some of the things that may happen if we see similar front of pack labels here in the US. I'll be looking forward to see what happens with that effort right now. Sean, I want to turn to you and ask an economist type question. What role does price play in adolescent food choices? Not only price, but the availability of pocket money? And how do you think that should influence policy? Our study shows that price is the most significant factor influencing the snack choices of the kids in our study. And higher prices definitely reduce the likelihood of seeing a certain product being selected. It was kind of interesting. Interestingly, this effect was consistent regardless of whether the kids regularly received pocket money. Suggesting that even those that don't receive spending money still are paying attention to price. And this was a little bit different from what we found in some other studies that I've been able to work on, in the US and Germany, that suggested that previous experience with pocket money, or getting an allowance, was really important for understanding which kids might be most careful about spending their own money. I don't know if that's something different in the Chilean context than those other contexts. Or if that was just about what the kids in this particular study were paying attention to because we're asking about different things. But when we look more closely at the kids in our Chilean study, we found some important differences. As Gabi already mentioned, those kids who received pocket money were the ones who were more positively inclined to choosing products with the eco labels. And that suggests that they might be valuing sustainability a little bit more when making their own choices. Perhaps because they're already a little bit more familiar with some of those dynamics of spending their own money. Whereas those without pocket money were more likely to choose cheaper options or sometimes the healthier options like the apples that we provided as an option in our study. And suggesting they're focused more on affordability or health. So, what this means for policy, given the strong influence of price, it means that policy interventions that focus on price, like taxes on unhealthy foods or perhaps subsidies for healthier options, might be effective tools in guiding better choices for these kids. But also, programs promoting budgeting skills and food literacy might help adolescents make more informed decisions both about the nutrition and the sustainability of the foods they're eating. Finally, since some kids are responding positively to eco labels, integrating sustainability messages with the nutrition education could enhance the impact of food labeling policies. Overall, combining price policies and education labeling strategies could be really effective in driving meaningful changes in children and adolescent food choices. Sean, thank you. And it's really important to appreciate the differences that may occur when we think about a country like Chile versus the US or in some of your other work in Germany. And understanding that youth culture may be different and may be shaping these behaviors. But it's very clear that all people, it sounds like, are responding to price. And that's a constant that we're seeing here. Sean, here's my final question for you. What is the take home implications of this study? Well, first and foremost, our findings here suggest that nutrition labeling alone isn't necessarily going to be enough to drive healthier choices among children and adolescents. It can be part of an answer, but policymakers looking to promote healthier food choices might need to compliment labeling with education campaigns that reinforce the meaning of these warnings and integrate them into school-based nutrition programs. That said, I think that Chile has already been a leader in this regard, because the food items that get the warning labels in the Chilean context are the same ones that are subject to different restrictions on marketing or sales in schools, as well. I do think that we're going to see kids and eventually adults just become more familiar with these categorizations because of the consistency in the Chilean law. Also, on the eco label side, leveraging that kind of eco labeling alongside nutrition messaging might be an effective combination to help promote both healthier and more sustainable food choices. And finally we've been talking about new front to pack labeling schemes here in the United States. And it's really important to make sure we learn as much as possible from the experiences with such policies in other countries. Chile's really been a world leader in this regard and so I'm very happy to have tried to contribute to an understanding of how people use these labels through this study and through some of the other projects that Gabi, you and I have all been involved in. Bios Gabriela (Gabi) Fretes is an Associate Research Fellow in the Nutrition, Diets, and Health (NDH) Unit of the International Food Policy Research Institute. She received her PhD in Food and Nutrition Policies and Programs at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, USA in 2022 and holds a master's in food and nutrition with a concentration on Health Promotion and Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases from the Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile. Her research interests are at the intersection of child obesity prevention, food policy and consumer behavior, and her doctoral thesis involved evaluation of a national food labeling and advertising policy designed to improve the healthfulness of the food environment and address the obesity epidemic in Chile, particularly among children. She has worked with a broad range of government, international organizations, academia, public and private sector stakeholders and decision-makers in Paraguay, Chile, and the United States of America. Sean Cash is an economist and Chair of the Division of Agriculture, Food and Environment at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. He conducts research both internationally and domestically on food, nutrition, agriculture and the environment. He is interested in environmental impacts on food and beverage production, including projects on crop quality and climate change, consumer interest in production attributes of tea and coffee, and invasive species management. He also focuses on how food, nutrition, and environmental policies affect food consumption and choice, with specific interest in children's nutrition and consumer interest in environmental and nutritional attributes of food. He teaches courses in statistics, agricultural and environmental economics, and consumer behavior around food. He is currently Specialty Chief Editor of the Food Policy and Economics section of Frontiers in Nutrition, and has previously served as an Editor of the Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics as well as the Chair of the Food Safety and Nutrition Section of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Quick episode right to the point this week with three fantastic interviews. First up is freshman offensive lineman from division 2 slippery rock Mike Crist, who tells the incredible story of how he saved a man's life by dragging him from a burning vehicle on the side of the road. Following that we hear from Marquette University track and field star turned St. Norbert football player Mitch Van Vooren about his collegiate journey and pro aspirations, and we close it out with Minnesota State Mankato tackle Marshal Foerner recapping his local pro day with the Bears. Thanks for tuning in!Video Chapters:0:00 Episode Overview3:04 Mike Crist - Slippery Rock13:46 Mitch Van Vooren - St. Norbert27:04 Marshall Foerner - Minnesota State
In this episode Anna dives back into the topic of prover networks & prover marketplaces with Norbert Vadas, Head of Product at ZkCloud. They kick off by mapping out different actors in the ZK supply chain, and then cover the variety of approaches and economic models behind prover marketplaces. They explore the ZkCloud system before diving into Norbert's perspective on the future of large-scale, industrial-grade ZK proving and what that will unlock. Related links: ZKV ZK Hack Kraków Mina Snarketplace Mina: What are SNARK workers and the Snarketplace Gevulot ZkCloud EthCC Paris: Toghrul Maharramov - Multi-Verifiers as a Hedge Against Bridge Vulnerabilities RISC Zero Bonsai Polygon zkEVM GitHub: Aztec Protocol Barretenberg ZK11: SNARK proving ASICs - Justin Drake Applications for zkSummit13 are now open, early bird tickets close this week! Apply now at www.zksummit.com. ZK is finally easy with Noir, the fastest-growing zero-knowledge programming language. Build privacy-preserving apps without any ZK experience. Aztec Labs is running a 4 week program, Noir Hack, with $200K in funding and grants. Sign up now at noirhack.com. **If you like what we do:** * Find all our links here! @ZeroKnowledge | Linktree * Subscribe to our...
She's Making an Impact | Online Marketing | Pinterest Marketing | Entrepreneur Tips
In this episode, I sat down with branding expert Norbert Elnar to talk all things Kingdom branding. From landing his dream job in the advertising world to walking away from it all to pursue his God-given purpose, Norbert shares his powerful story of choosing faith over flashy success. We dive into how Christian entrepreneurs can align their brands with their values, stand out in the marketplace with integrity, and truly make an impact for the Kingdom—without watering down their message or compromising on excellence. If you're ready to build a brand that reflects Jesus and serves well, this one's for you. __________________________________________________________ Ready for more? Here are 3 ways we can help you: 1)
Henry & Eddie bring you this week's strangest stories and true-crime news - but first, the boys mourn the loss of yet another beloved creator who brought joy to the world - Norbert the Dog: Dead at 15, AND THEN - a Canadian Ice Cream Truck stand-off in Kelowna, British Columbia, another "U-Egg-P" leak hits 4Chan, Ring doorbell captures the Devil on Texas family's doorstep, Florida Wedding attendee sparks a buffet brawl, and much, much MORE! Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to ad-free new episodes.