Podcasts about neutrality

Episode 62 explores why leaders who avoid taking a stance often unintentionally reinforce the status quo and weaken trust. Kristen and Sylvia argue that silence in moments of consequence is not peaceful — it's permissive. Through stories from law enforcement and organizational life, they unpack how neutrality can look like calm but is often self-protection that drains energy, mutes critical thinking, and signals an unwillingness to make hard decisions, leaving others to fill the vacuum. Running alongside the conversation is Sylvia's heroic battle with a cough that keeps trying to filibuster the episode — a scratchy-throated reminder that even when your voice is under attack, using it still matters.

In this episode, Niels Brabandt examines the leader's myth of neutrality and explains why true objectivity in leadership is far more complex than many executives assume. Using a documented legal case as a starting point, Niels Brabandt analyses how unconscious bias shapes performance evaluations, promotion decisions and corporate governance. He outlines practical steps leaders must take to move from subjective judgement to evidence-based decision-making. Key topics include: • The illusion of neutrality in leadership  • Unconscious bias and its organisational impact  • Performance reviews grounded in documented evidence  • Legal risks of subjective promotion criteria  • The difference between professional standards and personal preference  • Awareness training and structured bias qualification  • Data-driven leadership and measurable accountability  This episode is essential listening for CEOs, executives, board members, HR leaders and decision-makers in business who seek to strengthen credibility, fairness and governance standards. Host: Niels Brabandt / NB@NB-Networks.com Contact with Niels Brabandt: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nielsbrabandt/ Niels Brabandt's Leadership Letter: https://expert.nb-networks.com/ Niels Brabandt's Website: https://www.nb-networks.biz/ 

Rural Health News is a weekly segment of Rural Health Today, a podcast by Hillsdale Hospital. News sources for this episode: Marc Schollett, “Michigan lawmakers challenge rural healthcare funding criteria,” February 9, 2026, https://upnorthlive.com/news/local/michigan-lawmakers-challenge-rural-healthcare-funding-criteria, Up North Live. Covista, “Covista Care Capacity Monitor,” https://www.covista.com/research Mariah Taylor, “The current state of staff shortages, per executives,” February 10, 2026, https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/workforce/the-current-state-of-staff-shortages-per-executives/, Becker's Hospital Review. Emily Schabacker, “New mental health program meets kids where they are: at school,” January 12, 2026, https://cardinalnews.org/2026/01/12/new-school-based-program-shows-promise-for-youth-mental-health/, Cardinal News. Rural Health Today is a production of Hillsdale Hospital in Hillsdale, Michigan and a member of the Health Podcast Network. Our host is JJ Hodshire, our producer is Kyrsten Newlon, and our audio engineer is Kenji Ulmer. Special thanks to our special guests for sharing their expertise on the show, and also to the Hillsdale Hospital marketing team. If you want to submit a question for us to answer on the podcast or learn more about Rural Health Today, visit ruralhealthtoday.com.

Kázání na bohoslužbě Církve pro region (Apoštolská církev) ve Valašském Meziříčí.

"150 universities have adopted neutrality policies just since October 7th. I'm on the losing end of this trend." — Brian SoucekUniversities keep claiming what they see as the moral high ground of neutrality. But Brian Soucek, who holds the MLK chair at UC Davis School of Law, believes that's a dangerous myth. In his new book, The Opinionated University: Academic Freedom, Diversity, and the Myth of Neutrality in American Higher Education, Soucek argues in favor of the biased university. His argument is that even (or, perhaps, particularly) when universities stay quiet, they're actually taking sides through their policies, their hiring, their building names, their actions. Silence isn't neutral. It's ideological.This fetish with neutrality is gaining in popularity, Soucek warns. Since October 7th, an estimated 150 universities have adopted neutrality pledges—pushed by well-funded efforts from the Goldwater Institute and others. Every pledge has a vague moral carve-out: universities will still speak when their "mission is at stake." But everyone has a mission and they are all different. That's the whole point. Soucek claims the moral high ground of pluralism. That's why he wants Boston College to be different from Yale, UC Davis different from University of Austin. The flattening of higher education into some imagined neutral sameness is what terrifies this classical liberal.The real crisis, Soucek insists, isn't self-censoring students or woke professors. It's the external threat of federal funding cuts, hostile state legislatures, a Trump administration that has declared DEI illegal without exactly making it so. Universities are staying quiet because, as one UC president put it, "We don't want to be the tallest nail." But Harvard's faculty spoke out through the AAUP, and it changed the conversation. For Soucek, silence isn't safety. It's surrender. Eventually everyone will become the tallest nail. And will be flattened by a hammer-wielding ideological foe.On the promise or threat of AI, Soucek is blunt: the idea of objective algorithms deciding what statues to take down or what books to read sounds to him "completely dystopian." We'd lose something essential if we stopped allowing communities to make these contested decisions differently, he says. For Soucek, that's not a bug of an otherwise unbiased university. It's the feature of any credible institute of higher learning. Five Takeaways●      Neutrality Is a Myth: Universities claim neutrality but act in non-neutral ways—through policies, hiring, building names. Silence is a choice, not an absence of choice.●      150 Universities Signed Neutrality Pledges Since October 7th: Well-funded efforts from the Goldwater Institute are pushing this flattening of higher education. Soucek sees himself on the losing end.●      The External Threats Are the Real Crisis: Not self-censoring students. Federal funding cuts are existential. Universities are staying quiet so as not to be "the tallest nail."●      Pluralism, Not Homogeneity: Different universities should have different missions. That's why University of Austin is fine. New College Florida—where changes were imposed from above—is a disaster.●      AI Objectivity Is Dystopian: Letting algorithms decide which statues to take down or which books to read? We'd lose something essential. Contested decisions should stay contested. About the GuestBrian Soucek is Professor of Law and holds the Martin Luther King Jr. Chair at UC Davis School of Law. He is the author of The Opinionated University: Academic Freedom, Diversity, and the Myth of Neutrality in American Higher Education. He earned his JD from Yale Law School and his undergraduate degree from Boston College.ReferencesConcepts mentioned:●      The Kalven Report was a 1967 University of Chicago faculty report on institutional neutrality. It's been revived by organizations pushing neutrality pledges.●      The Goldwater Institute has funded efforts to get university boards to adopt neutrality policies modeled on the Kalven Report.●      Heterodox Academy is a campus speech advocacy organization that estimated 150 universities adopted neutrality policies since October 7th.●      FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) conducts surveys on campus self-censorship that Soucek references.Universities mentioned:●      University of Austin is a new university founded by tech figures with a consciously different mission. Soucek supports its existence as an example of pluralism.●      New College Florida was transformed by Governor DeSantis and Chris Rufo. Soucek calls it a disaster—changes imposed from above, not through shared governance.About Keen On AmericaNobody asks more awkward questions than the Anglo-American writer and filmmaker Andrew Keen. In Keen On America, Andrew brings his pointed Transatlantic wit to making sense of the United States—hosting daily interviews about the history and future of this now venerable Republic. With nearly 2,800 episodes since the show launched on TechCrunch in 2010, Keen On America is the most prolific intellectual interview show in the history of podcasting.WebsiteSubstackYouTubeApple PodcastsSpotify Chapters:(00:00) - Introduction: The myth of neutrality (02:18) - A challenge to both Left and Right (03:15) - Is there really a free speech crisis? (05:33) - Who wants the neutral university? (06:48) - The Kalven Report and Goldwater Institute (07:54) - October 7th and Gaza (09:22) - Where does intolerance come from? (10:00) - Can courts be neutral? (11:24) - DEI and the university's mission (14:04) - Should universities speak out against Trump? (15:53) - Does the university tilt Left? (17:03) - MLK and the right to break unjust laws (20:13) - The myth ...

Starting the Manual for Teachers Reading: Jevon Perra and Denise Darlene discussed how the lessons and teachings from the course can seep in over time without systematic study. Jevon Perra announced they would be reading "Tolerance," the third characteristic of God's teachers, starting on page 12 of the Manual for Teachers.Reading and Discussion on Tolerance and Judgment: Jevon Perra read that God's teachers do not judge, as judgment implies a lack of trust and self-deception. Jevon Perra observed that judgment assumes a position one does not have and that without judgment, all things are equally acceptable. Jevon Perra connected the deception to separation and the "zero sum game" mentality, where their gain means someone else's loss.Judgment and Ego Control: Denise Darlene proposed that judgment is a form of control by the ego, which seeks safety by determining if something is good or bad. Denise Darlene emphasized that everything is neutral and that judging separates one from their "best interest," citing the card, "I do not perceive my own best interest". Brian Genovese connected judging to concepts of good and evil, noting their sensitivity to bullying and instinct to fight injustice.Neutrality and Best Interests: Denise Darlene asked Brian Genovese to consider if the act of bullying could be a neutral event that ultimately provides a gift for the person being bullied. Brian Genovese acknowledged that their experience of being bullied gave them empathy, suggesting the event, while difficult at the time, resulted in a valuable lesson. Denise Darlene concluded that if they do not know their own best interest, they cannot possibly know someone else's best interest, suggesting that intervening in harm should be done without hatred or fear.The Gift of Reality and Trust in the Creator: Jevon Perra suggested that preference is similar to judging, as it separates one from the "gift of reality". Jevon Perra discussed that every experience is potentially a gift and a teaching from the creator, even the "bad ones," which were chosen in an ultimate sense. The discussion shifted to the concept of resting in God, which Jevon Perra stated is their daily reminder.Suffering and The Character: Jevon Perra reflected on how the ego can cause suffering and separation from contentment regardless of what the "character" is doing, such as when they are too frustrated or lost in the character. Jevon Perra brought up the concept of fighting for what one wants "like you're right, but listen like you're wrong," suggesting a lack of attachment to the outcome. Jevon Perra used the example of their spouse, Carolyn, getting upset during games like Monopoly or Catan, demonstrating the pain of attachment to winning.Lowering Expectations: Denise Darlene related the concept of non-attachment to lowering expectations, noting that one's response to events reveals if they have expectations. Denise Darlene described practicing non-attachment, particularly when ordering food or traveling with their spouse, Joe, by holding their day loosely and using the Course in Miracles prayer: "What would you have me do? Where would you have me go? What would you have me say? And to whom?".Enneagram and Attachment: Denise Darlene brought up their son, Charlie, who is an Enneagram Seven, noting that Sevens constantly plan for an "amazing, incredible experience" and therefore live with tremendous disappointment because life is not Disneyland every day. Jevon Perra shared a story where Charlie cried hysterically because they were going to Starbucks for treats instead of Dunkin' Donuts, illustrating Charlie's attachment to a specific outcome.Applying Non-Attachment to Daily Life: Jevon Perra observed that not everyone has the luxury of being contemplative, but they can still apply the principles of non-attachment and curiosity in a 9-to-5 job by trusting God in all outcomes. Denise Darlene affirmed this, stating one can have a checklist but needs to hold it loosely, using their son Jonathan's house remodeling project as an example of having to continually adapt to unexpected challenges and interruptions.Idols and Undivided Devotion: Denise Darlene used Jevon Perra's anxiety about Carolyn not being "okay" to point out that they had placed Carolyn on a throne as an idol, suggesting they were relating to them as God. Denise Darlene explained that God desires undivided devotion and recognition, stating that the "many gods" or idols we create "wreck our life" because we try to serve them. Denise Darlene then read from Neville Goddard's collection on Christian mysticism to define the "Word" as a desire seeking embodiment and the "I am" as the only reality.The Power of "I Am": The reading explained that to realize one's desire, the awareness ("I am") must agree with the desire, which results in the birth of the desired outcome. Denise Darlene concluded that Jevon Perra was trying to borrow peace and worth from Carolyn instead of cultivating it within themself through the truth of the "I am". Brian Genovese shared that they record their "I ams" and play them for themself before bed as a consistent practice to improve awareness.Managing Stress and Finding Resistance: Denise Darlene discussed using visual reminders and making the claim "I am the opposite of that" when a disturbance occurs. Jevon Perra shared that when they carry stress, often related to making money, they find the pain in their body, typically their chest or the back of their head. Jevon Perra noted that during meditation, they can feel the resistance and determine when they have been able to let everything go.The Practice of Releasing Resistance and Embracing Emptiness: Jevon Perra described a personal practice involving stopping, noticing resistance, and reminding themself that "it's okay" to release whatever anxiety or fear is present. They noted that releasing this resistance creates an "emptiness" which, paradoxically, is a "free, content" and "open" feeling where they are complete with the "nothing" that gives rise to everything. The personal struggle is figuring out how to engage in daily life and pursue goals from this free, content place, even though they recognize they could technically maintain the feeling all day long.Seeking the Kingdom of Heaven First: Denise Darlene offered a perspective based on the scripture, "seek first the kingdom of heaven," suggesting that living in a spiritual dimension is counterintuitive to the human experience, which is primarily based on fear and control. They related that the spiritual path demands a shift in priorities, recalling a time when they realized their relationship with their spouse, Joe, had taken precedence over their relationship with God, illustrating that making a person one's "god" could lead to terrible suffering if that person were lost. The emphasis should be on abiding in God first, rather than using God only as a tool when difficulties arise.The Path of Trust and Relinquishing Control: Denise Darlene explained that trust is necessary when pursuing the spiritual path, which often requires confronting situations where it seems "there isn't enough" to encourage faith growth. They noted that people often must reach the end of their own resources before turning to God, likening this to the experience of the prodigal son. Brian Genovese agreed that releasing expectations is crucial to letting things flow, noting that the fight-or-flight instinct is an ingrained human trait that makes it difficult to embrace faith and release control.Mistrust and Misplaced Dependency: Denise Darlene stated that the degree of difficulty in laying down control is proportional to the degree one has made themself God over things like income. They shared a personal experience where they had misplaced trust in their first husband as the "god of the roof over our head," only to realize they did not trust God to be their financial provider until their husband's life was threatened. When they finally asked God for help, their pastor immediately called them to offer $5,000 a month to maintain their lifestyle while their husband was in recovery.The Importance of Speaking and Asking: Brian Genovese affirmed that one must actively put their needs out there and speak them out to God because God does not read minds. They concluded that while help and good things will happen, they rarely occur within the timeframe people desire. Denise Darlene agreed, emphasizing that such occurrences are always at the perfect time and that navigating the path of trust can become a "fun game to play".

What if the goal is not to erase jealousy, but to stop letting it drive the car? Dr. Marie Thouin joins April and Scott to define compersion in clear, grounded terms, and to explain why it can show up as an emotion, an attitude, or even simple supportive neutrality. They talk about the spectrum from “I can handle this” to genuine joy, the “second arrow” of self-inflicted suffering, and the conditions that make compersion more likely: security in self, security in the relationship, supportive community, and more. The episode also explores how autonomy and trust intersect with boundaries, when “training wheels” help, and how to tell the difference between growth discomfort and self-abandonment.Dr Marie Thouin Websites:https://mariethouin.com/https://www.whatiscompersion.com/Naughty Gym Website:www.NaughtyGym.comOur Upcoming Events:1. Wild Love Theory Retreat -- https://www.naughtygym.com/wild-love-theory-retreat2. Barcelona Adventure Trip -- https://www.naughtygym.com/barcelona-20263. El Salvador Retreat -- https://www.naughtygym.com/naughty-gym-el-salvador

CELÝ ROZHOVOR V DÉLCE 53 MIN. JEN NA ⁠HTTPS://HEROHERO.CO/CESTMIR⁠⁠⁠⁠ A ⁠HTTPS://FORENDORS.CZ/CESTMIR „Na Ukrajině jsem strávila více času, než je asi ve válce záhodno,“ říká novinářka, válečná reportérka a držitelka Ceny Ferdinanda Peroutky Darja Stomatová o posledních letech, kdy na Ukrajině tráví pravidelně celé měsíce. Pro ni i pro místní se přitom „hrozně těžce“ hledá vzpomínka na dobu před rokem 2022, kdy byl život normální. Válka podle ní zasáhla každého - rodiny, děti i celé generace - a její důsledky budou ve společnosti přetrvávat na dlouhé roky dopředu. Nejtěžší je ale její trvání bez viditelného konce. „Ta nekonečnost konfliktu mě trápí asi nejvíc. Vlastně i to, že každý sebemenší náznak člověk vnímá jako nějaký posun a pak přijde velká ťafka a on to vlastně žádný posun není,“ popisuje novinářka. Mluví i o smrti lidí, které znala, o psychologickém teroru sirén i o vyčerpání z neustálé nejistoty. Přesto trvá na novinářské neutralitě. „Nejde o to, co já si myslím, ale jde spíš o to, jakou práci odvedu, aby byla co nejpravdivější,“ říká s tím, že aktivismus nebo přímou pomoc odmítá právě proto, aby její práce zůstala důvěryhodná pro všechny. Zásadní roli v jejím každodenním fungování hraje i spolupráce a partnerský vztah s kameramanem Janem Schürgerem, s nímž tráví na Ukrajině dlouhé týdny a měsíce v nepřetržité blízkosti a sdílí s ním nejen profesní odpovědnost, ale i strach, vyčerpání a rozhodování o míře rizika. Právě vzájemná důvěra a sehranost podle ní umožňují v prostředí války dlouhodobě obstát. „Ten strach je ale obrovský, spousta novinářů se na Ukrajinu nevracela, protože to jejich druhá polovička nechtěla a oni to pochopili,“ dodává s tím, že ani její partner si neumí představit, že by do válkou zasažené země jezdila s někým jiným, protože by „neměl věci pod kontrolou“. Stomatová je původem z Kazachstánu - do Česka přitom přišla už jako malá, kdy se její rodina po rozpadu Sovětského svazu rozhodla odejít kvůli nejistotě i omezeným možnostem pro rusky mluvící menšinu. Začátky byly podle ní těžké: rodiče hodně pracovali, rodina měla málo peněz a ona sama byla ve škole „cizinka“, která si na nové prostředí teprve zvykala. Skrze svou zkušenost dnes vnímá také příběhy dětí z Ukrajiny i Ruska, které často čelí šikaně a které jsou podle novinářky něčím, co by společnosti neměla přehlížet. Rozhovor se dotýká také kolektivní viny Rusů, propagandy jako zbraně, rozdělení ukrajinské společnosti, otázky voleb během války i budoucnosti konfliktu, který podle ní může skončit „do dvou let“, ale bez jistoty, jaký bude jeho konec. Co znamená být nestranným svědkem uprostřed války? Kde je hranice rizika a proč ji znovu překračovat? A co by se stalo, kdybychom o válce přestali informovat? I to se dozvíte v rozhovoru.

What if your horse isn't “being difficult,” but carrying a story no one has heard yet? Aly chats with animal communicator and quantum energy healer, Katherine Luna Sol, to explore The Antidote, her psychosomatic approach that listens to the body's narrative, releases the root belief, and “drops in” a precise antidote—truths like I am safe, I am worthy—that the nervous system can actually receive. From performance horses stuck in “I'm bad” loops to Mustangs holding terror from roundups, Katherine shows how neutrality—not suppression—unlocks real change in posture, focus, and connection.We get practical and scientific. Katherine shares how she blends emotion code work, biofield insights, and remote sessions to support issues conventional tests may miss, including thyroid imbalances and early-pattern Cushing's. She talks grounding with negative ions using a simple stainless-steel spoon on feet and spines, soft “Madigan-style” squeezes to hug an overwhelmed nervous system, and co-regulation practices that turn spooky energy into soft eyes and steady breath. Her core ethics—ask for consent, honor free will, do no harm—reframe leadership as lead-mare wisdom: attuned, congruent, and calm rather than dominant.We also bridge intuition and veterinary care through a hypermobility case that pointed toward connective tissue vulnerabilities and smarter breeding choices. Along the way, Katherine explains balancing left–right as feminine–masculine, why anger in saintly horses needs safe expression, and how soul contracts can be rewritten from struggle to joy. Try her quick heart-to-heart exercise: hand over your chest, breathe, imagine your horse's heart, and feel the field shift. What new “antidote” is your horse asking you to embody?Get in touch with Katherine:https://www.divinegraceanimalhealing.com/contactFacebook: Divine Grace Animal Healing and Communication Instagram: @dganimalcommunicationSend us a message. We'd love to hear from you.Intro/Outro music provided by Justin Tamminga

Namik Muduroglu and Amir Almaimani walk through MegaETH's launch strategy and why they are delaying the TGE. Thank you to our sponsors! ⁠Figure⁠ ⁠Crypto Tax Girl Months after its oversubscribed initial coin offering, MegaETH's mainnet is live. But the project is not launching its token just yet.  In this Unchained podcast episode, MegaETH strategy chief Namik Muduroglu and Head of Ecosystem Amir Almaimani break down the Ethereum Layer 2 chain's launch strategy, including its decision to delay TGE. They also explain how the MegaETH is navigating the current market slump and how it is positioning USDM as its long term moat. Plus, why they believe credible neutrality is a “losing strategy.” Guests: Namik Muduroglu, CSO & Founding Team at MegaETH Amir Almaimani, Head of Ecosystem of MegaETH Previous appearances on Unchained: MegaETH Just Had Its Public Sale. Can It Succeed in Building a Web2-Like Experience? Links: Unchained: Ethereum Lets Go of the Rollup Story. Here Are the 6 Tokens That Benefit MegaETH Plans Return of All Pre-Deposit Funds MegaETH Just Had Its Public Sale. Can It Succeed in Building a Web2-Like Experience? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Namik Muduroglu and Amir Almaimani walk through MegaETH's launch strategy and why they are delaying the TGE. Thank you to our sponsors! ⁠Figure⁠ ⁠Crypto Tax Girl Months after its oversubscribed initial coin offering, MegaETH's mainnet is live. But the project is not launching its token just yet.  In this Unchained podcast episode, MegaETH strategy chief Namik Muduroglu and Head of Ecosystem Amir Almaimani break down the Ethereum Layer 2 chain's launch strategy, including its decision to delay TGE. They also explain how the MegaETH is navigating the current market slump and how it is positioning USDM as its long term moat. Plus, why they believe credible neutrality is a “losing strategy.” Guests: Namik Muduroglu, CSO & Founding Team at MegaETH Amir Almaimani, Head of Ecosystem of MegaETH Previous appearances on Unchained: MegaETH Just Had Its Public Sale. Can It Succeed in Building a Web2-Like Experience? Links: Unchained: Ethereum Lets Go of the Rollup Story. Here Are the 6 Tokens That Benefit MegaETH Plans Return of All Pre-Deposit Funds MegaETH Just Had Its Public Sale. Can It Succeed in Building a Web2-Like Experience? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Guest: Jonathan Schanzer. Schanzer analyzes Iran's stalling tactics in negotiations via Oman, noting the pressure from a US armada while questioning Oman's neutrality as a mediator.1560 PERSIA

We don't tiptoe around spiritual warfare… We name it, claim it, and wage it. We don't coddle the culture… We confront it with Scripture. We don't settle for passive minds, we take the battle to the battlefield—the mind.Today, Paul M. Neuberger tears down the myth that faith is just a private affair or a Sunday ritual. He exposes the real front line: your thought life. He calls out comfortable Christianity. He rebukes unchecked thinking. He slams the door on the victim mentality.It's time to crucify excuses, not just medicate symptoms. It's time to walk in self-control, not self-pity (2 Timothy 1:7). The enemy wants your mind—Jesus already bought it.The world will mock this message. It will call you rigid, old-fashioned, intolerant. But the truth? "We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ." –2 Corinthians 10:5The question is: Will you stand or will you surrender when the mental war rages?Episode Highlights:01:13 – The great battlefield of our generation isn't politics, economics or culture wars. It's in our minds. And most believers are losing not because they lack faith, but because they lack discipline. We've been taught to manage symptoms instead of confronting sources. We medicate what should be crucified. We excuse what Scripture commands us to take captive. We call it just how I think when God calls it a lie that's got to be demolished.07:45 – One of the most dangerous lies infiltrating modern Christianity is this idea that believers are victims of their thoughts rather than stewards of them. This lie sounds compassionate, progressive and understanding, but it's spiritually paralyzing. It subtly strips believers of responsibility, authority and victory, replacing them with excuses and resignation. Scripture never presents the Christian as powerless over their mind. It presents the believer as accountable for it.39:49 –Remember this, please. You're not powerless. You're not helpless. You're not a victim of your thoughts. In Christ. You've been given authority, clarity, and responsibility. Scripture says this in First Corinthians, chapter 2, verse 16, we have the mind of Christ. That's not poetic language. It's a call to live differently, think differently, and lead differently.Connect with Paul M. NeubergerWebsite

Send a textThis week on Overall HR, there's no guest. Just me (Chase).I'm walking through the same questions I ask every guest and sharing my own HR story: how I landed here, the moments that broke my heart, the ones that clarified my values, and why I believe neutrality is one of the most damaging myths in this profession.From accidental beginnings to walking away when integrity was no longer negotiable, this episode is about what HR actually carries, what it costs to see everything, and why protecting culture sometimes means being willing to be unpopular.If you've ever loved this work and questioned whether it loves you back... this one's for you.

Episode DescriptionIn this episode of Your In Depth, we break down the Ryloth arc from Star Wars: The Clone Wars, covering Season 3 Episode 3 alongside Season 1 Episode 1 to view the story in proper chronological order.We discuss the Republic's struggle to liberate Ryloth, the politics of neutrality, and how the Jedi balance diplomacy and warfare. Topics include Bail Organa's diplomacy, Jar Jar Binks' controversial role, the ethics of galactic neutrality during wartime, and the cost paid by clone troopers on the front lines.We also dive into Yoda's leadership with the clones, the introduction of Asajj Ventress, and how these episodes establish major themes of the Clone Wars: sacrifice, propaganda, and moral gray areas in a galaxy-wide conflict.Chapters00:00 – Intro & episode order explanation03:24 – Season 3 Episode 3 summary (Ryloth blockade)07:24 – Republic logistics & political delays11:00 – Neutrality in Star Wars (Ryloth, Mandalore parallels)16:55 – Clone sacrifice vs Republic politics23:31 – Jedi Master Di & Captain Keeli's last stand28:23 – Jar Jar Binks and the controversial distraction plan32:07 – Season 1 Episode 1 overview35:07 – Introduction of Asajj Ventress38:09 – Yoda's leadership and clone individualism40:17 – Highs and lows of the arc41:55 – Final thoughts & wrap-upKeywordsStar Wars, Clone Wars, Ryloth arc, Clone Wars breakdown, Yoda Clone Wars, Asajj Ventress, Bail Organa, Jar Jar Binks, Republic politics, galactic neutrality, clone troopers, Star Wars lore, Clone Wars analysis, Jedi leadership

H.W. Brands explains that as Germany advances, FDR modifies neutrality laws while Lindbergh fears creeping intervention, with Churchill appealing for aid leading to the destroyers-for-bases deal intensifying domestic debate.

Every child faces challenges when it comes to stepping outside their comfort zone—whether it's trying a new food, petting an unfamiliar dog, or speaking up in class.But what if we could gently guide them to embrace these moments of bravery? Imagine the confidence they could build and the doors that could open when they learn to navigate the unknown.In this week's replay, we explore how to strengthen your child's courage muscle, especially for those who are naturally hesitant. You'll learn practical strategies to help them take small, meaningful risks that lead to greater confidence, joy, and resilience.Jennifer's Takeaways:Building a Child's Courage Muscle (00:00)Starting the Conversation and Setting Small Goals (03:08)The Role of Imagination and Visualization (04:34)Acting It Out and Maintaining a Playful Approach (06:29)Parental Support and Neutrality (07:26)Creating an Accomplishment Book (09:13)The Long-Term Nature of Parenting (10:07)The Importance of Risk-Taking and Growth (10:57)Resources and Support (11:39)Meet Jennifer KolariJennifer Kolari is the host of the “Connected Parenting” weekly podcast and the co-host of “The Mental Health Comedy” podcast. Kolari is a frequent guest on Nationwide morning shows and podcasts in th US and Canada. Her advice can also be found in many Canadian and US magazines such as; Today's Parent, Parents Magazine and Canadian Family.Kolari's powerful parenting model is based on the neurobiology of love, teaching parents how to use compassion and empathy as powerful medicine to transform challenging behavior and build children's emotional resilience and emotional shock absorbers.Jennifer's wisdom, quick wit and down to earth style help parents navigate modern-day parenting problems, offering real-life examples as well as practical and effective tools and strategies.Her highly entertaining, inspiring workshops are shared with warmth and humour, making her a crowd-pleasing speaker with schools, medical professionals, corporations and agencies throughout North America, Europe and Asia.One of the nation's leading parenting experts, Jennifer Kolari, is a highly sought- after international speaker and the founder of Connected Parenting. A child and family therapist with a busy practice based in San Diego and Toronto, Kolari is also the author of Connected Parenting: How to Raise A Great Kid (Penguin Group USA and Penguin Canada, 2009) and You're Ruining My Life! (But Not Really): Surviving the Teenage Years with Connected Parenting (Penguin Canada, 2011).

Are good and evil moral absolutes — or are they something else entirely? In this episode (1-165) of Living the Tao, Taoist Master Mikel Steenrod presents the Daoist view of good, evil, and neutrality as energetic positions, not moral judgments. Rather than focusing on right and wrong, Daoism examines how actions affect energy, probability, and personal power. This conversation explores why Daoism was never designed as a social or moral control system, how karma functions energetically rather than morally, and why neutrality may offer the greatest potential for influence and change. Topics include: The Daoist rejection of moral hierarchy Why judgment creates false polarities How karma actually works in classical Daoism Why destruction releases energy faster than creation The role of neutrality in spiritual cultivation How Qi Gong relates to energy outside moral frameworks This episode is ideal for listeners interested in Taoism, spirituality, philosophy, and anyone questioning traditional good-versus-evil thinking. In this episode (1-160), Taoist Master Mikel Steenrod explains why positivity is not about denying reality or forcing optimism. Instead, it's about where you place your attention, how you process experience, and how much failure you can tolerate without giving up. Topics include: Why negativity often feels justified—but limits your life The difference between motivation and long-term damage How childhood conditioning shapes what you focus on The Taoist idea of fail tolerance and endurance Why most people set goals that guarantee failure A practical, no-nonsense discussion of positivity as a trainable skill, not a personality trait.  

Please join us at patreon.com/tortoiseshack Associate Professor and contributing member of the Neutrality Roadshow, Patrick Bresnihan rejoins us on the Shack to talk about the impending erasure of the Triple Lock, the ongoing erasure of our neutrality, the fallacies at the heart of the militarisation agenda and why there is so much hope in Irish peoples pride in our peacekeeping neutrality. The Epstein Files and the dearth of good reporting:https://www.patreon.com/posts/patron-exclusive-150004285 Shrapnel's Sam Mcilwaine on deepening political polarisation:https://www.patreon.com/posts/patron-exclusive-149409039 Support Dignity for Palestine here:https://www.patreon.com/posts/call-to-stand-143037542

On this episode of the podcast, Larry Sanger, the co-founder of Wikipedia talks with Amanda Head on a wide variety of topics. From unfiltered conversations about how one of the internet's most powerful information platforms drifted from its original mission to a personal journey converting to Christianity from atheism. Sanger explains how Wikipedia evolved from a neutral, geek-driven experiment into what he argues is a left-leaning institution, one that systematically marginalizes conservative and libertarian viewpoints through opaque editorial policies and ideological gatekeeping. He lays out specific reforms he believes could restore credibility, including radical transparency and allowing competing articles on contested topics.The Wikipedia co-founder also shares his deeply personal journey from atheism to Christianity. He details years of serious theological study, philosophical inquiry, and what he sees as compelling evidence for biblical prophecy and truth claims. He reflects on why Christianity ultimately provided answers secular philosophy could not.Finally, Sanger previews his upcoming blog and premium platform, where he plans to dive deeper into philosophical theology, political thought, and structured seminars for serious thinkers.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

It's time for a refresher about why it's harmful when therapists put on a front of "neutrality". Especially during this time in history, people need therapists to be a place to land, to meet a real person, to talk about their completely understandable fears and have those validated and held. Heads up: this conversation is a little messy and unfinished. We're curious about what you think.We're taking the couch on the road! Join us between May 9th and May 24th, we'll be heading to 8 Canadian cities for a LIVE episode recording and a chance to connect with other therapists in your area. We hope to see you there! We are going on a cross-Canada tour in May 2026! Keep an eye out for dates! Join us on Patreon for bonus content at www.patreon.com/edgeofthecouch or share your thoughts and questions via DM on Instagram @edgeofthecouchpod, email at connect@edgeofthecouch.com, or voice note at speakpipe.com/edgeofthecouch.We have partnered with Janeapp, an all-in-one practice management software. You can learn more at Jane.app/mentalhealth. Or, if you are ready to get started, mention Edge of the Couch in the note during sign up.Alison McClearywww.alpenglowcounselling.com@alpenglow_counselling on InstagramJordan Pickellwww.jordanpickellcounselling.ca@jordanpickellcounselling on InstagramEdge of the Couchwww.edgeofthecouch.com@edgeofthecouchpod on Instagram

PREVIEW FOR LATER TODAY Guest: Edmund Fitton-Brown. Fitton-Brown explains Saudi Arabia denies airspace to U.S. forces to offer Iran a "fig leaf," signaling neutrality to maintain a fragile ceasefire with the Houthis.1890 caravan

Mankind is not neutral. This is true if we are Christians or unbelievers. At no point are we seek to lay down our faith or allow unbelievers to act as if they have a superior view because they do not believe. We all have our presuppositions.

The Mindset Shift That Separates Burnout from Breakthrough You've been told self-care is bubble baths and boundaries. But what if the real self-care is becoming the kind of person who doesn't need to recover from their own emotions every week? That's exactly what Dr. Gabrielle Lyon and I dig into in this episode. Dr. G is a board-certified physician and New York Times bestselling author who has worked with some of the most successful entrepreneurs in the world. And she says the ones who sustain success over time have one thing in common: they stay neutral. Big win? Neutral. Big problem? Neutral. It's just another Tuesday. We go way beyond nutrition and fitness in this conversation. We're talking about why emotional neutrality is one of the most underrated entrepreneurial skills, why discipline is actually the new self-care, and why your health quietly determines how far your business can go. Dr. G also shares how to catch yourself before old patterns start creeping back in and how to use your physical body as a tool for confidence and clarity. If you've ever felt like your emotions are running your business instead of you, this one's for you. HERE ARE THE 3 KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM THIS EPISODE: 1️⃣ Emotional Neutrality Is a Skill, Not a Personality Trait – The best entrepreneurs don't ride the highs and lows. They stay steady because as high as you let yourself go, that's how hard you'll crash. Neutrality isn't boring. It's sustainable. 2️⃣ Discipline Is the New Self-Care – Another episode or glass of wine isn't self-care if they pull you away from your standards. Real self-care is keeping promises to yourself, honoring your commitments, and building trust in your own word. 3️⃣ You Will Never Outgrow Your Health – Your business has a ceiling, and it's your body. You cannot outgrind your physiology. If you want to scale, your health has to come first. Not as a nice-to-have, but as the foundation everything else stands on. RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE: The Forever Strong Playbook by Dr. Gabrielle Lyon (Order for book + bonuses + six-week challenge) Follow Dr. Gabrielle Lyon on Instagram House of Pamelyn by Pamelyn Rocco Body Health Essential Amino Acids Brooklyn Naked Nutrition Dried Beef CHAPTERS 00:00 - Just Another Tuesday: The Entrepreneur's Mindset 01:40 - Amy's Transformation Story 03:00 - The Start of Amy's Health Revolution 04:15 - Why Muscle Is the Organ of Longevity 05:20 - The One Trait of Ultra-Successful Entrepreneurs 07:40 - Emotional Highs Equal Emotional Lows 09:30 - Practicing Emotional Neutrality: A Real-Life Strategy 12:00 - Reframing Stress: Don't Avoid It, Add It 16:30 - Tend & Befriend: A Better Stress Response 19:00 - Discipline Is the New Self-Care 21:20 - How to Use Discernment to Fuel Focus 23:30 - Physical Discipline = Mental Confidence 25:30 - Using Your Body as a Tool for Mastery 28:10 - Standards vs. Goals: The Mindset Shift for High Achievers 30:00 - Protein Overload? Or Protein Revolution? 32:20 - You'll Never Outperform Your Health 34:00 - Behind the Scenes of the New Dietary Guidelines 36:55 - How Much Protein Should You Really Eat? 38:00 - Easy Protein Hacks for Busy Women 40:20 - How to Build a High-Protein Morning Routine 44:00 - Real-Life Meal Ideas: What Dr. Lyon Eats 48:15 - Muscle Builds Your Brain Power 50:00 - Know Yourself at Your Best 53:00 - Don't Go It Alone: Use Community for Accountability 55:15 - The Forever Strong Playbook: Your Tactical Guide 57:20 - Get the Bonuses + 6-Week Challenge 58:15 - Amy's Final Encouragement MORE FROM ME Follow me on Instagram @amyporterfield SUBSCRIBE & REVIEW If you loved this episode, please take a moment to subscribe and leave a review on Apple Podcasts! Your support helps us reach more entrepreneurs who need these insights.

Today's QA we talked about my personal history with politics and what happens when you fold or capitulate to external pressure to use your voice.This is particularly useful for anyone feeling the stress and pressure in today's supercharged times.Then we got into some Q&A about- low ticket offers- money guilt - Self censorship - Getting angry and that's okay - Charging for 1:1- Geopolitics and investing- Lack of confidence - Water signs Hope you enjoy!

C. S. Lewis famously wrote that we cannot remain neutral about Jesus: He was either a lunatic—on the level of a man who claims to be a poached egg—or He is the Son of God.In today's episode, we continue our sermon series from the archives, The Gospel According to Mark, as Paul teaches through the entire third chapter of Mark and the six vignettes that reveal the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ.To hear more sermons from Paul, visit PaulTripp.com/Sermons.

Can a university ever truly be neutral in today's social and political climate? Pushing against the tide of universities increasingly pledging to stay neutral about contentious issues, law professor Brian Soucek argues that their promises are doomed to fail—universities can't help being opinionated.  Soucek says that neutrality is a myth, and he takes a deep dive into several prominent campus controversies of the day, including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts and restrictions on campus speech and protest. Each issue requires universities to choose a side in what they do, if not also in what they say. In everything from curricular and admissions decisions to their response to outside rankings and their evaluation of faculty, universities express the values at the heart of their mission. Soucek argues that those pushing for neutrality are only preventing universities from standing up for their values, whether in today's current moment of crisis or in periods of political calm.  Join us to discuss Soucek's timely and deeply engaging call for universities to dispense with neutrality as a governing principle and to focus instead on what their mission should be, and who should determine it. A Humanities Member-led Forum program. Forums at the Club are organized and run by volunteer programmers who are members of The Commonwealth Club, and they cover a diverse range of topics. Learn more about our Forums. In association with the American Constitution Society. OrganizerGeorge Hammond  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of The Raven, David “The Raven” Corbo breaks down the Timothy Alberino debate fallout—what went right, what went wrong, and why the conversation around aliens, demons, disclosure, and the spiritual realm has become so fractured.This is not a replay of the debate.This is a post-mortem.From Alberino's definition of demons, to filibustering tactics, to the tension between materialism and Scripture, this episode dissects why the discussion stalled—and what it revealed about modern Christian engagement with disclosure.Topics covered include:Alberino's definition of demons (and why it took 40+ minutes)Aliens vs demons and the limits of reductionismDisclosure narratives and the gospel problemWhy “neutral” doesn't exist in ScriptureMaterialism creeping into Christian theologyDebate tactics, filibusters, and framingWhy clarity matters more than credentialsThis episode is candid, critical, and unapologetic—aimed at pattern recognition, not personalities.recaperino

Sermon Notes: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xNMlWChfYoxGBWEIn3ZMXjtqP5OhvM-K/view?usp=drive_linkSubscribe to our channel:https://www.youtube.com/shepherdshouseazWebsite: shepherdsaz.orgInstagram: @shepherdshouseazFacebook: /shepherdshouseazTiktok: @shepherdshouseazYoutube: /shepherdshouseaz

Canada, a business entity headquartered in Washington, DC, is at the center of intense, high-stakes allegations involving governance, crimes against humanity, national security, and election integrity.  It has grown into the world's largest terrorist hub with over 4,000 organizations operating there per CSIS' own report.  Their plans to execute 14.7 Million Canadians by lethal injection have been leaked, yet why have we not seen a turnover to peace and freedom while the corportocracy in Ottawa have been shown to both support and carry out international war crimes from experimental gene-editing WMDs, fund FTO's labelled by the USA, have no election integrity, have multiple lawsuits from Norman Traversy and others tossed out of a corrupt judiciary from RICO to the Freedom Convoy, Universal Ostrich Farms and more.  Sovereign Sensei Dan Oke connects the dots across Canada + the U.S., digging into interactions with JAG, the Law of War Manual's context, and the White Flag of Parley as sovereignty momentum accelerates in what's lauded to be the 51st State.   .

This episode "Academic Neutrality" by M.R. Robinson (©2026 by M.R. Robinson) read by Stefan Rudnicki, and "Hunter, Hunter" by Oluwatomiwa Ajeigbe (©2026 by Oluwatomiwa Ajeigbe) read by Janina Edwards. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, I'm inviting you into a conceptual backflip: it is your responsibility to get what you want, and it's also one of the most loving, grounded things you can do. I explore how money neutrality becomes the greatest opening to wealth, not by forcing outcomes, but by removing sacrifice, pressure, and time-based urgency from the equation. I also share what I'm currently living through in my own world, learning how to be boundless without control, and how unconditional love changes the way I move through relationships, business, and money. This is about expanding beyond old structures, pulling in new timelines, and letting desire be a clean, powerful force again. In this episode, I cover: Why getting what you want is responsibility, not selfishness The hidden cost of sacrifice, and how it blocks love (and money) Boundaries vs. "boundless" living, and what changes everything Breaking the structure before life breaks it for you Why I don't live in time, and how that collapses results Money neutrality as a felt sense of "home," no matter what's happening externally If you feel the pull: This is the final week to join the upcoming round of The Spiritual Investor Mastermind. If you're ready for the deep recalibration, you can apply here: https://elizabethralph.mykajabi.com/apply Follow me on Instagram: @elizabethralph

Al shares how he ended up on Fox News defending his podcast comments about liberal policies in major cities, while the guys laugh about the media repeatedly crediting the wrong Robertson for the same quotes. Bill Maher's growing distance from woke orthodoxy sparks curiosity and even has Jase joking about inviting him into the studio for a real conversation about Jesus. The guys turn to Jesus' prayer in John 17, exploring eternal life as active participation with God that reshapes how believers live, suffer, and face death. In this episode: Acts 2, verse 42; 1 Corinthians 1, verses 8–9; 1 Corinthians 10, verses 16–21; 2 Corinthians 6, verses 14–18; 2 Corinthians 13, verse 14; Philippians 1, verses 5–6; Philippians 2, verses 1–2; Philippians 3, verse 10; Galatians 2, verse 9; Philemon, verse 6; Hebrews 13, verses 12–16; Psalm 131, verses 1–3; Romans 6, verses 3–5 “Unashamed” Episode 1250 is sponsored by: https://texassuperfood.com — Get 35% off your first order with code UNASHAMED today! https://chministries.org/unashamed — See why Christians are ditching health insurance for good. Get a simpler alternative at half the cost! Get $10 Off at BRUNT with code Unashamed at https://www.bruntworkwear.com/unashamed #Bruntpod https://netsuite.com/unashamed — Download the free business guide, Demystifying AI today! http://unashamedforhillsdale.com/ — Sign up now for free, and join the Unashamed hosts every Friday for Unashamed Academy Powered by Hillsdale CollegeListen to Not Yet Now with Zach Dasher on Apple, Spotify, iHeart, or anywhere you get podcasts. Check out At Home with Phil Robertson, nearly 800 episodes of Phil's unfiltered wisdom, humor, and biblical truth, available for free for the first time! Get it on Apple, Spotify, Amazon, and anywhere you listen to podcasts! https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/at-home-with-phil-robertson/id1835224621 Chapters: 00:00 Fox News give Jase credit for Zach's genius 09:38 Jase trades a few ducks for a new boat 16:48 First John in reverse 25:47 Fellowship equals participation, not transaction 36:40 Darkness creates a spiritual death spiral 45:40 Neutrality with evil doesn't exist 50:05 Death through the lens of resurrection — Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Al, Zach, John Luke, and Christian conclude their study of David by confronting the truth that forgiveness does not erase consequences. They trace how unaddressed sin and lingering guilt created a leadership vacuum that fractured David's family, fueled rebellion, and led to civil war and the death of thousands. The guys show how private sin inevitably becomes public and why silence after repentance can be as destructive as the original failure. They close by pointing to Jesus as the true Shepherd-King who restores what sin deforms and leads with justice and mercy.  In this episode: Psalm 51; 2 Samuel 7, verses 12–16; 2 Samuel 12, verses 1–14; Genesis 4, verses 1–8; 1 Samuel 16, verses 1–13; 2 Samuel 21, verses 1–14; 2 Samuel 24, verses 15–25; Matthew 1, verses 1–17 Today's conversation is about Lessons 7 & 8 of The David Story: Shepherd, Father, King taught by Hillsdale Professor Justin Jackson. Take the course with us at no cost to you! Sign up at http://unashamedforhillsdale.com/ More about The David Story: Encounter the beauty of the Bible. The David Story: Shepherd, Father, King explores the lives of Israel's first two kings—Saul and David—to discover the Bible's profound lessons about fatherhood, the nature of sin, and the consequences of sin on both a family and a nation. While David suffers great tragedies due to his own transgressions, he models a path to redemption through repentance. Join Professor Justin Jackson in a careful reading of First and Second Samuel to gain a deeper understanding of the meaning and beauty of this story that is not only fundamental to the Christian and Jewish faiths, but also a literary masterpiece. Join us today in this pursuit of a deeper understanding of the Bible in “The David Story.” Sign up at ⁠http://unashamedforhillsdale.com/ Check out At Home with Phil Robertson, nearly 800 episodes of Phil's unfiltered wisdom, humor, and biblical truth, available for free for the first time! Get it on Apple, Spotify, Amazon, and anywhere you listen to podcasts! https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/at-home-with-phil-robertson/id1835224621 Listen to Not Yet Now with Zach Dasher on Apple, Spotify, iHeart, or anywhere you get podcasts. Chapters: 00:00-09:38 Private sin becomes public collapse 09:39-14:54 When forgiveness doesn't erase consequences 14:55-22:21 Neutrality isn't the same as innocence 22:22-30:26 Absolom's hair becomes his downfall 30:27-39:55 David returns to his shepherd origins 39:56-49:31 Jesus fixes the world David broke — Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Send us a textGod doesn't expect us to coast through life.John 12:46I have come as light into the world, so that everyone who believes in me would not remain in darkness.Support the show

One minute you feel strong, clear-headed, and relieved… and the next you're sobbing in your car wondering if you just destroyed your life. If you feel emotionally unrecognizable during divorce, you are not alone—and you're not “doing it wrong.”In this episode of How Not to Suck at Divorce, attorney Morgan Stogsdill and comedian/marketing guru Andrea Rappaport break down the emotional rollercoaster of divorce—why it happens, why it's normal, and how letting emotions drive decisions can create legal and financial consequences you can't unwind.You'll learn how to adopt emotional neutrality (without becoming emotionless), why realistic expectations protect your sanity, and the exact do's and don'ts that help you stay grounded—especially when kids and co-parenting are involved.What You'll Learn in This EpisodeWhy divorce triggers “emotional whiplash” (relief, guilt, rage, panic, regret—sometimes all at once)The difference between feelings vs. facts in divorce decision-makingWhy emotional highs aren't the problem—expectations areWhy emotional lows don't mean you're making the wrong choiceWhat “emotional neutrality” actually means (and why it's self-preservation)How to ask your attorney for realistic expectations and a Plan BThe biggest mistakes people make when they're activated (and how to avoid them)Practical ways to regulate your nervous system and get off the rollercoaster(Practical Action Steps)If you're in the early stages of divorce—or you're already activated—here's what Andrea and Morgan want you to do:✅ 1) Adopt emotional neutrality“That meeting went well. Okay.”“That meeting didn't go well. Okay.” Neutrality is not numbness. It means your feelings are not in charge.✅ 2) Ask for realistic expectations (every time)When something goes well, ask your attorney:“What's a realistic expectation from here?”“What if this strategy doesn't work—what's our Plan B?”✅ 3) Don't make permanent decisions in temporary emotional statesMorgan's legal rule: if you're activated, you pause—not react.✅ 4) Stabilize with routinePredictable routines regulate your nervous system when your life feels unpredictable.✅ 5) Write it down—don't reactJournal the emotion, then bring it to your therapist (not your attorney). Your attorney is your legal guide—not your emotional support system.✅ 6) Choose ONE safe personAvoid oversharing with people who escalate you (you know who you are, “Tina from the bar”

Send us a textJoin Professor Jeffrey Sachs and historian Michael J. Carley, retired Professeur at the Université de Montréal, for a discussion of his groundbreaking trilogy on the international crises of the 1930s: Stalin's Gamble, Stalin's Failed Alliance, and Stalin's Great Game. Drawing on decades of archival research, Carley challenges the familiar Cold War narrative that paints Stalin and Hitler as “dual dictators” and instead uncovers a forgotten history of the Soviet Union's sustained efforts to build a collective security alliance against Nazi Germany.Sachs and Carley explore how Britain, France, and the United States repeatedly rejected these overtures, shaped by anti-communism, imperial interests, and deep-seated prejudices that cast the USSR - not Hitler - as the greater threat. This strategic blindness, Carley argues, helped pave the way to World War II and has since been obscured by Western historiography and popular culture.This episode offers listeners a powerful narrative of missed opportunities, ideological blinders, and the consequences of mistrust among great powers. It is a story from the 1930s with striking resonance today, revealing how historical misunderstanding can shape international politics, and how the failures of statecraft then echo in our world now.The Book Club with Jeffrey Sachs is brought to you by the SDG Academy, the flagship education initiative of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Learn more and get involved at bookclubwithjeffreysachs.org.Footnotes:Books by ⭐️ Thanks for listening to Book Club with Jeffrey Sachs!

THE EROSION OF NEUTRALITY AFTER POLAND AND FRANCE Colleague H.W. Brands. H.W. Brandsoutlines the erosion of neutrality following the fall of Poland and France. Roosevelt maneuvers to adjust neutrality laws and aids Britain via the destroyers-for-bases deal, despite isolationist skepticism. Lindbergh and his allies fear these steps are a trap leading to inevitable war. Meanwhile, Churchill's correspondence with FDR becomes increasingly manipulative, desperate to secure American support against Germany, while Lindbergh warns that the British are seeking a US bailout. NUMBER 3

LEND-LEASE AND BRITISH PROPAGANDA Colleague H.W. Brands. H.W. Brands explains the passage of the Lend-Lease Act (HR 1776), which effectively ended American neutrality by committing industrial resources to Britain. The segment reveals the covert British propaganda campaign led by William Stephenson to manipulate US opinion. Brands also describes how FDR utilized a likely forged map of a German-partitioned South America to frighten Americans, while Lindbergh argued that aiding Britain was supporting imperialism rather than democracy. NUMBER 5

In this podcast episode, I explore money neutrality as a radically different way to approach 2026 and the entire idea of goal setting. Instead of building a list of outcomes to chase, I invite you to notice how traditional goals can create distance, pressure, and a version of you that feels familiar but unsustainable. I reframe the real "goal" as learning to live a new way, one where you stay rooted in your energy, keep up with your daily life, and still operate in the world without forcing outcomes. I explain that I don't work my way into money neutrality, I allow my way into it. Money neutrality is a letting go and a letting in, where detachment becomes the invite and effortlessness becomes the marker that you're moving into a new reality. I also talk about jumping timelines, the normalization of a new amount of money, and the fear that can surface when you imagine becoming the version of yourself who receives more. If you want a 2026 intention that removes the pressure, dissolves the old frenzied relationship with achievement, and opens you to unlimited receiving, this episode is your invitation. The first Mastermind of the year begins on February 3rd. Apply now at thespiritualinvestor.com 

Send Us a Message (include your contact info if you'd like a reply)Trust accelerates the work. That simple idea sits at the heart of our conversation with betrayal trauma specialist and DCA-certified ADR divorce coach, Christina Riley, as we explore why representation isn't a tagline—it's a performance driver in divorce coaching and mediation. Clients don't arrive as blank slates; they bring history, stress responses, and a relationship to systems that can either inflame or calm conflict. When cultural understanding is present from the start, the nervous system settles and the coaching room turns from explanation into strategy.We talk candidly about the access gap at the entry point: why many people in underrepresented communities delay support not because they don't need it, but because they're unsure the space will be safe or relevant. That delay has costs—escalated conflict, higher expenses, and harder-to-repair ruptures. Christina shares how Black clients intentionally seek coaches who share lived experience to reduce emotional labor, build early trust, and gain the clarity needed for mediation, parenting plans, and settlement conversations. The payoff is practical and immediate: clearer goals, stronger boundaries, and a sharper distinction between what genuinely matters and what's merely emotionally loud.We also examine the profession's responsibility. Neutrality doesn't demand sameness. Competence includes cultural literacy, rigorous standards, and ethical practice that adapts to reality without diluting quality. Training organizations like Divorce Coaches Academy can widen the pipeline while maintaining high bars through mentorship, community, and honest conversations about barriers. Lived experience is not a liability; paired with strong training, it's a lens that improves outcomes across ADR.If you care about early intervention, reduced conflict, and durable agreements, this conversation is an invitation to build inclusion thoughtfully and on purpose. Listen, share with someone who needs to hear it, and subscribe to stay part of a community shaping a more effective, accessible divorce coaching field.Connect with Christina at Christina Riley Coaching here: christinariley.comNot yet a DCA Certified Divorce Coach? Apply for the next cohort which begins Jan 11, 2026. Find out details here: https://www.divorcecoachesacademy.com/divorcecoach Learn more about DCA® or any of the classes or events mentioned in this episode at the links below:Website: www.divorcecoachesacademy.comInstagram: @divorcecoachesacademyLinkedIn: divorce-coaches-academyEmail: DCA@divorcecoachesacademy.com

In Part II of this two-part series, guest host Esaa Mohammad Sabti Samarah, PhD, LMSW reunites with Dr. Siham Elkassem, Dr. Bryn King, Dr. Nuha Dwaikat-Shaer, and doctoral candidate Amilah Baksh to move beyond naming harm and toward a deeper examination of responsibility. This episode turns a critical lens on how the social work profession responds, or fails to respond, to anti-Palestinian, anti-Arab, and anti-Muslim racisms, with particular attention to the ways calls for “neutrality” shape research, teaching, and professional practice.The conversation interrogates neutrality as it appears in social work academia, especially in relation to empiricism and claims of objectivity. The panel introduces and critically examines the concept of “weepy universalism,” a term they coin for social workers in their forthcoming work to describe how generalized expressions of sympathy can obscure power, flatten difference, and ultimately reproduce harm rather than challenge it.The episode also brings these debates down from theory to practice, exploring what they mean for social workers on the ground, particularly those working with youth and communities most directly impacted by these forms of racism. The series closes with a collective call to action, challenging the profession to move beyond symbolic gestures and toward principled, sustained solidarity with Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims, as part of broader struggles for justice and liberation.This episode invites listeners to reckon with complicity, resist comfort, and reimagine what ethical practice demands in moments of profound injustice.#BeyondNeutrality #EthicalSocialWork #SolidarityNotSilence #WeepyUniversalism #YouthJustice #DecolonizeSocialWork #JusticeInActionLinks to Published WorksDwaikat-Shaer, N., Baksh, A., Elkassem, S., & King, B. (2025). Phenomenologies of Silence: On the Palestine Exception and the Complicity of Social Work Academe. Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work, 3(2).Siham Elkassem - Google ScholarSupport the showSupport the Center for Security, Race and Rights by following us and making a donation: Donate: https://give.rutgersfoundation.org/csrr-support/20046.html Subscribe to our Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEbUfYcWGZapBNYvCObiCpp3qtxgH_jFy Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rucsrr Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/rutgerscsrr Follow us on Threads: https://threads.com/rutgerscsrr Follow us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/rucsrr Follow us on TikTok: https://tiktok.com/rucsrr Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://csrr.rutgers.edu/newsroom/sign-up-for-newsletter/

Kgomotso Modise, in for Clement Manyathela, speaks Mzwanele Manyi, who is the Jacob Zuma Foundation Spokesperson, Lionel Adendorf, who is the TRC Inquiry Spokesperson and Thembi Simelane who is a representative for the affected families to discuss objections made to the new TRC Inquiry by various parties. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sponsored By: → Ora | For an exclusive offer head to https://ora.organic/pages/partner-drg and use code HEALTHYSELF30 for 30% off your first order. → JASPR | For an exclusive offer go to jaspr.co/DRG and get $200 OFF for a limited time. Episode Description Can unprocessed emotions sabotage your manifestation? Neuroscience reveals why positive thinking alone never works. Most manifestation advice keeps you stuck. Affirmations, vision boards, and "good vibes only" ignore the critical factor: your nervous system runs programs you can't see—and those hidden emotional loops block everything you're trying to create. Christy Whitman, New York Times bestselling author of The Flow Factor with 25+ years of subconscious reprogramming experience, exposes the truth: You cannot attract abundance while trapped in survival mode. This is the science of why your prefrontal cortex—your creative, manifesting brain—shuts down when unprocessed trauma activates your stress response. Your brain doesn't distinguish between what you consciously want and what your subconscious emotional imprints keep recreating. That's why you attract the same toxic relationships, financial patterns, and dead-end situations—no matter how hard you visualize. Christy reveals the biological mechanism behind "stuckness" and introduces The 90-Second Shift—a somatic technique that rewires your nervous system, clearing emotional blocks that sabotage manifestation. Discover: • Why self-compassion (not self-criticism) is the gateway to real manifestation • The neuroscience of "bushwhacking"—how single traumatic moments create energetic vortexes attracting painful experiences • Why focusing on your soul's essence (not surface desires) unlocks true abundance • The Three Buckets of Vibration: Lack, Neutrality, and Freedom—and how to shift between them • How unprocessed emotions fill your "container" so gratitude and joy have nowhere to land • The Law of Polarity: why contrast and discomfort are your greatest manifestation teachers • Breaking generational trauma patterns keeping families stuck in scarcity cycles • The myth of "spiritual bypassing"—why you must feel emotion to release it • The somatic touch protocol activating your vagus nerve within seconds Here's the truth: You can't pour abundance into a nervous system flooded with unprocessed fear. Until you clear the emotional debris creating low-frequency patterns, you'll keep manifesting from lack, no matter what your affirmations say. If you've been doing "all the manifestation work"—journaling, visualizing, affirming—but still hitting walls, this episode reveals the missing piece your spiritual teachers never measured. My one stop shop for quality supplements: https://theswellscore.com/pages/drg Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:16 - The Biggest Lie in Manifestation (And What Actually Works) 8:01 - Why Traditional Therapy Keeps You Stuck in the Same Patterns 13:17 - The Three Buckets: Moving from Lack to Abundance 20:02 - How Unprocessed Trauma Creates Your Reality 26:27 - The 90-Second Compassion Practice That Changes Everything 33:21 - Why You Can't Think Your Way Out of Emotional Patterns 41:14 - Money Manifestation: Shifting Your Energetic Relationship with Abundance 51:29 - Quantum Time: Healing Your Younger Self Right Now 1:00:00 - The Five C's of Flow: From Contrast to Clarity

Yorke Rhodes III, Co-Founder, Blockchain at Microsoft, reveals how Credible Neutrality and the convergence of AI agents and stablecoins are powering the next, decentralized wave of technological innovation. Drawing on lessons from the early internet, Yorke Rhodes III, Co-Founder, Blockchain at Microsoft, explains why credible neutrality is vital to prevent the centralization of Web2 and emphasizes the urgent need for digital provenance in the age of synthetic media. He details how the convergence of AI agents and stablecoins creates instant liquidity and accelerates enterprise value, urging the industry to think bigger for the next generation. - Links mentioned from the podcast:  ⁠Yorke's Twitter  Microsoft Blockchain Website -Follow us on Twitter: ⁠Sam Ewen⁠, ⁠CoinDesk⁠ -From our sponsors: Break the cycle of exploitation. Break down the barriers to truth. Break into the next generation of privacy. Break Free. Free to scroll without being monetized. Free from censorship. Freedom without fear. We deserve more when it comes to privacy. Experience the next generation of blockchain that is private and inclusive by design. Break free with Midnight, visit ⁠midnight.network/break-free⁠ Need liquidity without selling your crypto? Take out a ⁠Figure Crypto-Backed Loan⁠, allowing you to borrow against your BTC, ETH, or SOL with 12-month terms and no prepayment penalties. They have the lowest rates in the industry at 8.91%, allowing you to access instant cash or buy more Bitcoin without triggering a tax event.Unlock your crypto's potential today at Figure! ⁠https://figuremarkets.co/coindesk⁠ - "Gen C" features host Sam Ewen. Executive produced by Uyen Truong.

Join us to explore how rising consciousness interacts with planetary magnetics and why so many feel faster cycles, stronger emotions, and body symptoms. Hear William share practical ways to meet change with neutrality and invite higher levels to lead so the body can release density and land in freedom.Please click subscribe and join us next time.

The appearance of drones of unknown origin in Dublin last week around the time of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy's visit again highlighted the security challenges of the present day and Ireland's lack of capability to act in its own defence. Neutrality remains a popular policy, as again demonstrated recently by the election of Catherine Connolly as president. That popularity does not answer the question of how much Ireland should invest in its own defence. Ireland diverges from other neutral European countries in our low defence spending and reliance on others for protection, information and security. But against those calling for bigger defence budgets, others warn of militarisation and point out the money could be better spent elsewhere. So does being a voice for peace preclude greater defence spending, or is defence spending a crucial part of a viable neutrality? On today's podcast Hugh is joined by Naomi O'Leary to pick apart the elements of Ireland's approach to defence and neutrality, how we compare to others and what questions will arise as Ireland comes under increasing pressure in Europe to boost capabilities. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ireland's Exposed Western Flank and Europe's Ukraine Stance — Judy Dempsey — Dempsey examines how Ireland's steadfast neutrality and limited defense capabilities leave its critical undersea communication cables vulnerable to Russian eavesdropping and potential sabotage. Despite maintaining budget surpluses, Ireland prioritizes social issues, including housing, over defense investments. Dempsey notes that European powers view the U.S.-Russia peace proposal for Ukraine with skepticism, characterizing it as a "Russian wish list," while German leadership remains publicly committed to sustained Ukrainian military support. 1896 COUNTY KILDARE