Podcasts about neutrality

We look at adaptive reuse through two lenses: a blockbuster case in the UK capital and an attempt to get European cities to legislate for less demolition.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Las dos guerras mundiales afectaron a prácticamente toda Europa. Sólo un puñado de países se mantuvieron neutrales en ambas. En la primera fueron algunos más. Noruega, muy dependiente del comercio marítimo, sufrió serías pérdidas en su flota mercante lo que generó inflación y escasez, pero consiguieron evitar la temida invasión mediante buenos oficios diplomáticos. Suecia, que había declarado la neutralidad perpetua en 1814, tuvo que padecer un bloqueo británico que restringió su comercio con Alemania. Eso le forzó a tener que claudicar ante los aliados. Dinamarca, que no llegaba a los tres millones de habitantes en 1914, experimentó un boom inicial seguido de una crisis ya que dependía mucho de Alemania y el Reino Unido. Los Países Bajos, en una posición central, actuaron como puerto de salida al Atlántico para los alemanes. Eso les costó algunas pérdidas en su marina mercante e incluso requisas de buques por parte de los aliados. Suiza, neutral desde el congreso de Viena, tuvo que lidiar con sus propias divisiones internas y una aguda escasez de alimentos, pero sirvió como refugio para innumerables refugiados, entre ellos Vladimir Lenin. España, debilitada por la guerra de Cuba, declaró su neutralidad y se benefició de un auge exportador que trajo consigo inflación y malestar social. En la segunda guerra mundial solo cinco grandes países europeos permanecieron neutrales hasta el final. Suecia adoptó una neutralidad "acomodaticia", permitió el tránsito de los alemanes por su territorio y les vendió grandes cantidades de mineral de hierro, un suministro vital para el III Reich. Sólo al final de la guerra y por presión aliada se vieron forzados a restringir los envíos. Suiza, rodeada por potencias del Eje desde 1940, dependía del carbón alemán, por lo que tuvieron que esforzarse para que la neutralidad no sólo lo fuese, sino también lo pareciese. España estaba recién salida de la guerra civil y muy debilitada. Franco se dejó querer por el Eje. Tras la derrota de Francia pasó de la neutralidad a la "no beligerancia”. Durante buena parte de la guerra se decantó por los alemanes, aunque nunca llegó a declarar la guerra a los aliados. Portugal hizo lo contrario, se mantuvo neutral, pero decantándose hacia los aliados. Irlanda aprovechó la guerra para reafirmar su independencia del Reino Unido. La neutralidad marcó la posguerra de los que se decidieron por ella. Muchos abandonaron esta postura tan pronto como terminó la guerra: Noruega, Dinamarca, Portugal y los Países Bajos se unieron a la OTAN en 1949. Suecia prefirió seguir siendo neutral hasta que con motivo de la guerra de Ucrania se unió a la OTAN. España se quedó aislada durante una década, un ostracismo europeo del que salió gracias a una serie de acuerdos con EEUU que la aproximaron a la órbita occidental, un viaje que culminó con su ingreso en la OTAN en 1982. Hoy sólo quedan dos países formalmente neutrales en Europa: Irlanda y Suiza, a los que habría que sumar a Austria que tras la guerra recobró su independencia y decidió imitar a sus vecinos de los Alpes. La neutralidad siempre ha sido un equilibrio extraordinariamente frágil, por eso pocos pueden permitírsela en Europa. Si algo se aprendió en el siglo XX, es que cuando estalla una guerra pocas cosas hay más difíciles que mantenerse neutrales. En La ContraRéplica: 0:00 Introducción 3:41 Los neutrales 1:10:15 Caravaggio 1:17:48 El Air Force One Bibliografía: - "Shaping neutrality throughout" de Inmaculada Cordero - https://amzn.to/4lASN7i - "The Theory and Practice of Neutrality in the Twentieth Century" de Roderick Ogley - https://amzn.to/3THUBPz - "Historia total de la segunda guerra mundial" de Olivier Wieviorka - https://amzn.to/40po98k - "1914-1918: Historia de la Primera Guerra Mundial" de David Stevenson - https://amzn.to/4lJX7RB · Canal de Telegram: https://t.me/lacontracronica · “Contra la Revolución Francesa”… https://amzn.to/4aF0LpZ · “Hispanos. Breve historia de los pueblos de habla hispana”… https://amzn.to/428js1G · “La ContraHistoria de España. Auge, caída y vuelta a empezar de un país en 28 episodios”… https://amzn.to/3kXcZ6i · “Lutero, Calvino y Trento, la Reforma que no fue”… https://amzn.to/3shKOlK · “La ContraHistoria del comunismo”… https://amzn.to/39QP2KE Apoya La Contra en: · Patreon... https://www.patreon.com/diazvillanueva · iVoox... https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-contracronica_sq_f1267769_1.html · Paypal... https://www.paypal.me/diazvillanueva Sígueme en: · Web... https://diazvillanueva.com · Twitter... https://twitter.com/diazvillanueva · Facebook... https://www.facebook.com/fernandodiazvillanueva1/ · Instagram... https://www.instagram.com/diazvillanueva · Linkedin… https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernando-d%C3%ADaz-villanueva-7303865/ · Flickr... https://www.flickr.com/photos/147276463@N05/?/ · Pinterest... https://www.pinterest.com/fernandodiazvillanueva #FernandoDiazVillanueva #neutrales #guerramundial Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

In this episode, I interview Julia Stapleton about frequency calibration and spiritual awakening. Julia shares her journey from passive spirituality to an active exploration of practices that transformed her understanding of manifestation. After a significant awakening experience, prompted by personal challenges and mentorship, she shifted her perspective on reality creation, emphasizing the importance of releasing control and achieving emotional neutrality. Cheers,Pete Find Julia at: https://alchemyofcreation.com/services/ And the Master Class at: https://alchemyofcreation.com/masterclass Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/peterwilliams.innapowa Instagram: @peterwilliams.innapowa YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@peterwilliamsinnapowa923 Get in touch: https://www.peterwilliamsinnapowa.com Follow the show and leave a review on Apple Podcasts and wherever you listen to podcasts. Episode transcripts are posted on my website at https://www.peterwilliamsinnapowa.com/podcasts/the-inna-powa-podcast Podcast production by Der Podcast Coach – https://derpodcastcoach.com

In this LIVE in-studio episode, we dive into the concept of 'owning your power' and discuss the journey of overcoming fear and self-doubt. Binu and her guest Marsha, share their personal experiences and insights on how slowing down and being present can enhance self-trust. They explore the ways people often give away their power by seeking external validation and provide practical tips on how to reclaim it. The conversation highlights the impact of limiting beliefs, the importance of taking action despite fear, and the role of self-love in personal growth. Audience questions focus on navigating collaboration, the power of perspective shifts, and using fear as a compass for personal development. This engaging discussion aims to inspire listeners to recognize their worth and embrace their true potential. HIGHLIGHTS 00:01:00 - Owning Your Power 00:02:30 - Fear and Its Impact 00:04:30 - Transforming Fear into Curiosity 00:06:30 - The Role of Evidence in Overcoming Fear 00:08:30 - The Nature of Limiting Beliefs 00:10:30 - Taking Action and Recognizing Opportunities 00:12:30 - Collaboration and Self-Understanding 00:14:30 - Neutrality and Self-Talk 00:16:30 - Purging Limiting Beliefs 00:18:00 - Audience Interaction and Sharing Insights 00:20:00 - Responsibility and Self-Reflection 00:22:00 - Practices for Self-Soothing Connect with BINU Website: https://www.binu.ca/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/binudhindsa/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ShapeYourLifewithBinu/ LinkedIn: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/binudhindsa Email: binu@binu.ca Marsha Vanwynsberghe — NLP Storytelling Trainer, OUTSPOKEN NLP Coaching Certification, Author, Speaker, and Podcaster Download FREE “You Are Supported” Hypnosis and Subliminal Bundle HERE  Join the next cohort of OUTSPOKEN NLP Coaching Certification (kick-off in March 2025) HERE Learn more about changing the Stories We Tell Ourselves Digital Program HERE. Use Code PODCAST to receive 20% off. Code FASTACTION20 Tap the “Follow” button never to miss a show, and if you love the show, please feel free to tag me on social media, share it with a friend, or leave me a rating and review. This helps the show grow! Website: www.marshavanw.comConnect on IG. Click HERESubscribe on YouTube. Click HERE  

Wexford County Council Chair Joe Sullivan cast the deciding vote in a dramatic 13–13 tie to back a motion rejecting Government plans to abolish or amend the Triple Lock on military neutrality. The motion, brought forward by Aontú's Jim Codd, warns of a breach of trust with the Irish people. Meanwhile, Fine Gael's Cllr Darragh McDonald, who opposed the motion, tells us why he believes the Triple Lock needs review.

Up next is Aontú Councillor Jim Codd, who brought forward the motion to defend Irish neutrality and retain the Triple Lock. With Wexford County Council narrowly passing the motion, Jim joins us to explain why he believes protecting this long-standing principle is vital for Ireland's sovereignty and future.

Up next is Aontú Councillor Jim Codd, who brought forward the motion to defend Irish neutrality and retain the Triple Lock. With Wexford County Council narrowly passing the motion, Jim joins us to explain why he believes protecting this long-standing principle is vital for Ireland's sovereignty and future.

170: The Power of NeutralityHow removing judgment from food and fitness can set you free.What if food wasn't good or bad?What if rest wasn't lazy and exercise wasn't punishment?In this episode, I dive into the power of neutrality—how taking the emotional charge out of our choices creates space for real, lasting transformation. This mindset shift allows us to make decisions about eating, training, and self-care based on what serves us, not what shames us.We'll explore:Why moralizing food and fitness keeps you stuck in guilt cyclesHow neutrality helps you navigate perimenopause, chronic pain, ADHD, and real-life energy dipsThe difference between “this is bad” vs. “this isn't working for me right now”Why neutrality is a missing link in long-term consistencyYou'll walk away with tools to release the all-or-nothing mindset and finally build a relationship with wellness that feels empowering and sustainable.✨ If you're tired of feeling guilty for what you eat or how little you've trained, this episode will set you free.Be sure to connect with Lisa Barwise and Warrior Goddess Kettlebell Training on social media: Instagram @lisa_barwise @wgkettlebelltraining Facebook www.facebook.com/warriorgoddesskettlebelltrainingYoutubehttps://www.youtube.com/warriorgoddesskettlebelltraining What you can do to help the Podcast? If this podcast means anything to you and you want to support it. Simply Subscribe & Review in Apple Podcasts.Apple Podcasts is one of the only platforms where you can both subscribe and review.How to Subscribe or Follow The Podcast1. Open Apple Podcast App.2. Go to the icons at the bottom of the screen and choose “search3. Search for “Goddess Got Goals”4. Hit the top Right Hand "+" sign5. Open Spotify 6. Search for “Goddess Got Goals”7. Hit the 'Follow' underneath the image How to Leave a Podcast Review Open Apple Podcast App. Go to the icons at the bottom of the screen and choose “search” Search for “Goddess Got Goals” Click on the SHOW, not the episode. Scroll all the way down to “Ratings and Reviews” Click on “Write a Review” This is the best way for us to reach more people and of course let us know that our episodes mean something to you!...

The imposition of Christian beliefs and values upon a society — building Christian nations — is a requirement for all Christians, Priests, and Pastors. The fundamental set of Christian values and beliefs remains the Ten Commandments (Matthew 5:18-19), the first of which points exclusively to Jesus Christ. In this current Luciferian Theocracy, demonic beliefs and values are actively promoted, and dissent from their religion is crushed. Who has ever heard of government school failing to promote kindness and condemning bullying? These values are cornerstones of their religion. Luciferian “kindness” means to endorsing evil such as sodomy and tranny-ism. Luciferian crusades against Bullying really means to bully and condemn students brave enough to exalt Jesus Christ and condemn sodomy. Even the use of the term “sodomy” is justification for the official and sanctioned bullying. “Tolerance” in their religion means tolerating sodomy, and other evils, while being intolerant of values reflected in the Holy Scriptures such as honoring the Sunday Sabbath. “Christian values” are the values of the Holy Scriptures, from Genesis through he Revelation. Christian values including the condemnation of Jews and Judaism, the revilement of other 'religions,' and the rejection of sodomy. Even “Christian” Pastors reject Christian values — they are not really Christian, but rather they are Judeo-Christian like Judas Iscariot. (Siding with the Jews is the Biblical definition of treason agains Jesus Christ.) A Christian reformation must be founded on the reclamation of all of society for Jesus Christ. It begins in the pulpits. Preachers must declare that Christian duty requires the disciplining of entire nations to obedience to Jesus Christ and His Word — the building of Christian nations, including the knowledge of what a biblical nations really is, which is in part the descendants from a common ancestry. Neutrality is Satanism — it is the Luciferian theocracy we live under today. “Tolerance” is Satanism when it is tolerance of evil in society. Pastors must declare themselves in open rebellion against Satan and his values. They do this by refusing to abide by Satan's morality and insist upon build Christian nations — by openly rejecting Satan's demand to submit to his morality. Rebellion begins in the pulpits. Yes, they will call you racist, intolerant, antisemitic, Hitler, Nazi, fascist, a hater and so on. They are the intolerant ones. They are by bullies. They are the defenders of Satan's order. “It is enough for the disciple to be like his teacher, and the servant like his master. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they malign those of his household.” Matthew 10:25 ESV Fritz Berggren, PhD www.bloodandfaith.com  

Join us for an in-depth conversation with Steven Goldfeder, Co-Founder and CEO of Offchain Labs, the parent company of Arbitrum—the leading Ethereum Layer 2 solution by Total Value Locked (TVL).In this episode, we explore:How optimistic rollups work and their role in Ethereum's scalabilityThe ZK vs. optimistic rollup debateThe future of Ethereum L2s and their impact on the Ethereum ecosystemSteven's insights on DeFi growth, ETH vs. BTC, and the importance of neutrality in tech stacksThe episode kicks off with a special clip from AJ Warner, Co-Founder of Arbitrum, recorded at EthCC, before diving into Steven's journey into blockchain and his vision for the future of Ethereum scalability.00:00:00 – Why Ethereum Made Rollups Too Cheap to Ignore00:00:31 – Meet AJ Warner, Co-Founder of Arbitrum (Live from EthCC!)00:00:45 – Robinhood's Big Crypto Announcement: What It Means for Ethereum00:06:10 – Transition to Steven Goldfeder: The Visionary Behind Arbitrum00:07:05 – Steven's Journey: From Academia to Blockchain Pioneer00:13:24 – Optimistic Rollups 101: How They Supercharge Ethereum00:21:06 – ZK vs. Optimistic Rollups: The Great Debate00:29:34 – How Ethereum L2s Are Strengthening the Ethereum Mainnet00:36:20 – What More Can Ethereum Do to Support L2s?00:38:57 – The Status of Stage 2 L2s: What's Next?00:40:12 – Enshrining L2s: The Future of Ethereum Scalability00:40:25 – Infrastructure Trade-Offs: Making the Right Choices00:46:35 – Bridging the Gap: Interoperability Between L1s and L2s00:51:38 – What Sets Arbitrum Apart from the Competition?00:56:51 – Neutrality and Fairness: The Cornerstones of Tech Stacks01:04:52 – DeFi's Next Chapter: Steven's Predictions for ETH, BTC, and Beyond01:08:37 – Closing Thoughts: The Road Ahead for Ethereum and ArbitrumDon't miss this deep dive into the world of Ethereum Layer 2s and the innovations shaping the future of blockchain.

Last week, NATO held its annual summit in the Hague, Netherlands. Where U.S. President Donald Trump persuaded most NATO countries to commit to a target of 5% of GDP to increase the budget for defence. We are not a member of NATO but with talks about giving up our neutrality policy, we might be left with no choice but to join and pay the €20 billion annual membership fee. For context, this could pay to build a new Metrolink in 2026 and every year thereafter. All to discuss with Economist, Colm McCarthy.

Lovte slová v novej hre Denníka N. Zahrajte si Slovosleď: www.dennikn.sk/slovosled

In this episode Mo sits down with a Licensed NYC Therapist to discuss Lel's expertise, specializing in eating disorders. Lel shares her journey navigating disordered eating in her personal life and discusses some of things she has learned while in recovery. Tune In!

The Awake Space Astrology Podcast is 100% ad free thanks to the members of The Awake Space Patreon. http://patreon.com/theawakespaceFor rectifications, natal readings and astrology consults go to wokeastrology.com/book-onlineIn this episode of the Awake Space Astrology Podcast, Laurie Rivers discusses the upcoming Venus-Uranus conjunction, and its implications for personal growth and the universal gifts offered to assist during this time of tremendous change. In the opening segment Laurie discusses how the upcoming retrogrades of Neptune, Saturn and Mercury are working to help us navigate through these strange and often unsettling times. Laurie gives you her predictions for July, including potential seismic activity and weather patterns, while encouraging listeners to embrace change and engage with their communities.In the end segment Laurie walks you through understanding why you need to embrace the future, accept the gifts and open to new experiences.Chapters00:00 Intro02:44 Navigating Chaos and Systemic Change04:18 Astrological Insights for July09:55 Global Conflicts and Political Commentary15:41 Personal Development and Community Engagement19:09 Astrological Overview for July 202522:42 Key Astrological Events and Their Implications27:55 Retrogrades and Their Global Impact30:51 Weather Patterns and Natural Disasters36:48 Political Climate and Global Tensions41:35 Economic Predictions and Market Reactions52:15 Patron Shout Outs and Podcast Growth01:00:18 Preparing for the Venus Uranus Conjunction01:00:41 Understanding the Venus-Uranus Conjunction01:06:13 The Impact of Uranus in Taurus01:09:21 Embracing Change and Disruption01:12:08 The Universe's Neutrality and Personal Growth01:15:07 Opening to New Energies and Experiences01:17:56 The Role of Intuition and Guidance01:20:33 Accepting Love and Opportunities from the Universe

No Medics, No Press, No Mercy: Modern War Doesn't Believe You Anymore In theory, war has rules: press badges, medics, the Red Cross, the Geneva Conventions. But in practice—on the battlefield, on the street, or online—those protections are myths, not shields. And in 2025, no one in uniform truly believes in neutrality anymore.Whether in Gaza, Fallujah, or downtown Los Angeles, one reality has taken hold:Everyone is a combatant until cleared.Talk to JSOC operators, riot cops, drone pilots, or soldiers who've served in asymmetric warzones, and you'll hear it without hesitation. Journalists, NGOs, charity workers, even medics—all are potential threats. Open-source intelligence (OSINT) has made everyone's digital footprint an operational asset. What you post online can—and does—get you profiled in the field.A close friend of mine, a DIA interrogator embedded with a JSOC Little Bird unit in Iraq, once said it straight:“The vest doesn't protect you—it flags you for vetting.”And if you're wearing a vest labeled “PRESS” but tweeting like an activist? You're not neutral. You're narrative. And in modern conflict, narrative is firepower.No place illustrates this breakdown like Gaza. A population half under 18, with mosques doubling as command centers, apartment buildings as launchpads, and schools as arms caches. This doesn't mean every Gazan is a militant—but no soldier in the field can afford to assume they're not.That's not a moral judgment. It's a tactical one.The same logic applied in Vietnam, where children strapped bombs to their chests. It applied in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Kosovo. And it applies in America too—where during the George Floyd protests, even medics and credentialed journalists were shot, tear-gassed, tackled. Not because they were mistaken, but because they were no longer presumed neutral.Here's a harder question no one wants to ask:If a population is truly oppressed, where's the resistance?In occupied France, the Resistance bombed train tracks, assassinated collaborators, and ran sabotage cells. In Vietnam, even old women ran courier networks. But in Gaza? If Hamas is so hated, where are the Gazans fragging their commanders? Where are the defections, the bombings of Hamas arms depots, the assassinations from within?Silence can mean fear. Or it can mean complicity. Or something in between—Stockholm, survival, or shared ideology.In the U.S., we talk about “civilians” as if the distinction still means something. But with over 400 million privately owned firearms and tens of millions ideologically radicalized online, let's be honest: If America were ever invaded, “civilians” would become insurgents by nightfall.That's the world we live in now. There are no neutral NGOs. No unarmed narratives. No protected identities. Only signal and threat.The 20th century gave us the myth of the sacred civilian.The 21st gave us livestreams, hashtags, and high-velocity optics.And in that world, no medic, no press, no mercy. You are what your feed says you are.

In February 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. China has never condemned the invasion, and its government and media have carefully avoided using term “Ukraine War,” opting instead to refer to the war as the “Ukraine crisis,” the “Russia-Ukraine conflict,” or the “special military operation,” a term that echoes Moscow's language. Beijing's approach to the Ukraine War has included support for Russia, a commitment China's own principles, including respecting Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and a professed desire for peace.This episode's discussion will focus on China's evolving posture toward the war and China's relationship with Ukraine. Joining the podcast this episode is Dr. Vita Golod, who is a Junior Research Fellow at the A. Yu Krymskyi Institute of Oriental Studies, National Academy Sciences of Ukraine, and a Visiting Adjunct Instructor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.She is also the co-founder of the Ukrainian Platform for Contemporary China and a board member of the Ukrainian Association of Sinologists.  Timestamps[00:00] Start[01:35] China's Relationship with Ukraine Prior to Russia's Invasion[05:06] President Zelenskyy's Accusations Against China [08:20] Contemporary Ukrainian Perceptions of Relations with China [12:14] Ukrainian Perceptions of Sino-Russian Relations[16:25] China as a Mediator and Peacemaker[19:06] China's Interests in the Outcome of the Russo-Ukrainian War[21:21] What concrete steps could China take to facilitate peace? [23:14] China's Role in the Post-War Reconstruction of Ukraine[28:08] The Future of Sino-Ukrainian Relations

First Samuel 22 presents a comparison between two contrasting kings—Saul and David—which illustrates the choice every person must make between following God's chosen king or the world's way. Neutrality is impossible: Everyone must choose a side. While following Jesus may not bring popularity or earthly success, it offers the only true safety and eternal life.

Part 1 Power vs. Force by David R. Hawkins SummarySummary of "Power vs. Force" by David R. Hawkins "Power vs. Force" is a philosophical and spiritual book written by Dr. David R. Hawkins, which explores the distinctions between power, which he associates with higher moral and ethical values, and force, which corresponds to lower, more destructive tendencies. The central theme of the book is the concept of human consciousness and how it can be calibrated on a scale of levels of truth. Key Concepts:Levels of Consciousness: Hawkins introduces a scale from 1 to 1000, where different emotional states correspond to different levels of consciousness. Shame (20), Guilt (30), Apathy (50), Fear (100), Desire (125), Anger (150), Pride (175) are lower levels. Higher levels include Courage (200), Neutrality (250), Willingness (310), Acceptance (350), Reason (400), Love (500), Joy (540), Peace (600), and Enlightenment (700+).Force vs. Power: Force is associated with manipulation, coercion, and effort. It often comes from lower levels of consciousness and is dependent on external conditions. Power, in contrast, is innate, comes from higher consciousness, and is aligned with love, truth, and integrity. It tends to be self-sustaining and uplifting.Kinesiology and Muscle Testing: Hawkins proposes that muscle testing can be a means of determining the truth-value of statements based on their alignment with higher or lower consciousness. By applying this technique, one can discern forces or influences in life that enhance or diminish wellbeing.Truth and Reality: Hawkins posits that there is an absolute truth that can be aligned with higher consciousness and that individuals can attune themselves to this truth through self-awareness and spiritual practice. This truth elevates personal and collective consciousness which contributes to societal progress.Spiritual Development: The journey towards higher consciousness is framed as a greater alignment with power rather than force. The book encourages readers to strive for higher emotional states, which cultivate well-being, compassion, and unity. Applications:Personal Growth: By understanding where one resides on the consciousness scale, individuals can actively work to raise their level and embrace more empowering outlooks.Social and Organizational Dynamics: Hawkins' insights can be applied to improve relationships, leadership qualities, and communal interactions by promoting power-oriented values over force-driven actions. Conclusion:"Power vs. Force" invites readers to reflect on their own level of consciousness, the nature of their actions, and the impact they have on themselves and others. Through the lenses of philosophy, psychology, and spirituality, Hawkins presents a compelling argument for choosing "power" as a path toward personal and collective transformation.Part 2 Power vs. Force AuthorDavid R. Hawkins David R. Hawkins (1913-2012) was an American psychiatrist, spiritual teacher, and author. He gained recognition for his work in the fields of consciousness research and spirituality, particularly through his concepts of consciousness levels and the interplay between power and force.Power vs. Force Published: The book "Power vs. Force" was first released in 1995. Content: In this book, Hawkins introduces the concept of a scale of human consciousness and differentiates between power (which is based on true strength, integrity, and benevolence) and force (which is associated with manipulation, coercion, and ego-driven actions). He also discusses the calibration of different levels of consciousness using a numerical scale, which has become one of his hallmarks.Other Notable Books by David R. Hawkins: The Eye of the I: From Which Nothing is Hidden (2001) I: Reality and Subjectivity (2003)...

Stand-Up to RacismIn 1972 Catholic families – who had endured three years of sustained sectarian attacks on their homes – fled Annalee St in North Belfast. Last month - fifty-three years later - Catholic homes in Annalee St. were again the target of sectarian attack and families were forced to flee. In the last fortnight we have also witnessed the firebombing of homes in Ballymena, the Larne Leisure Centre and racist attacks in other parts of the North.The images of homes in flames in Ballymena reminded me of similar scenes I first witnessed in Belfast in August 1969. The film footage of that period is of streets ablaze, frightened families hurriedly stacking furniture on lorries or carrying their most precious possessions on their backs. Then it was the racism and sectarianism of the apartheid unionist state attacking nationalist and republican families, killing residents, destroying hundreds of homes and forcing thousands to become refugees in our own city.Regrettably, the same sectarian and racist fundamentalism that motivated those attacks still exists today among some in our society who campaign against housing for Catholics, hang effigies of political leaders on bonfires and use violent rhetoric to promote hate crime against immigrants and those they define as ‘others'. That is those who are of a different religion or colour, or sexual orientation. Defending NeutralityThe Israeli rogue state has set the world on a dangerous course. Its deadly assault on Iran, allied to its violent actions in Lebanon and Syria and its genocidal war on the Palestinian people, has cast a huge shadow over the Middle East. As its military forces continue to kill scores of Palestinians daily in Gaza and its war planes attack Iran the Israeli military imposed a complete siege on the west Bank. Over a thousand military checkpoints which provide Israel with absolute control over the occupied west Bank, were completely closed imposing a siege on the Palestinian towns, villages and isolated farms of that region.As the world focusses on the exchanges between Israel and Iran the Zionists' genocidal and ethnic cleansing strategy against the Palestinian people is escalating. Those western states that have refused to challenge Israel's murder of tens of thousands of Palestinians or stand-by international law, are now defending Israel's attack on Iran using the same unacceptable excuse that Israel has the right to defend itself.Pat Finucane - End the DelayIt has been ten months since the British Secretary of State Hilary Benn first announced that he was setting up an independent inquiry into the killing of Pat Finucane under the 2005 Inquiries Act. Last week he appointed Sir Gary Hickinbottom as the Chair of the Inquiry. Hickinbottom has been given responsibility for investigating one of the most high profile examples of state collusion between loyalist death squads and British state agents and agencies during the decades of conflict.As well as Hickinbottom, former Police Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan and international human rights lawyer Francesca Del Mese have been appointed as assessors to the inquiry. Their role is to advise the Chair but they will not be involved in any final report.It has been a long difficult road for Geraldine Finucane and her family to secure this Inquiry. Twenty-four years ago the British and Irish governments agreed at Weston Park to establish public inquiries into a number of troubles-related cases. Canadian Judge Peter Cory recommended inquiries into the deaths of: Rosemary Nelson, Robert Hamill, Billy Wright, and Patrick Finucane and also into the deaths of RUC officers Bob Buchanan and Harry Breen.

Dr. Susanne Fürst is an Austrian politician and a prominent member of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ). Dr. Fürst has served as a member of the National Council since 2017. Since 2019, Dr. Fürst has also held the position of deputy parliamentary group leader for the FPÖ.FOLLOW Dr. Fürst on X: @susanne_fuerstSUPPORT OUR WORK https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/thank-youtube/ VISIT OUR WEBSITE http://www.judicialwatch.org

Live from Zürich: Benno Zogg, Juliet Linley and Mark Dittli discuss Swiss neutrality, meditation and where to buy your Alpine home.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Professor Steve H. Hanke, professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University and the founder and co-director of the Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise, joins Julia La Roche on episode 265 to discuss the economy and his new book "Making Money Work: How to Rewrite the Rules of Our Financial System." Sponsors: Monetary Metals. https://monetary-metals.com/julia Kalshi: https://kalshi.com/juliaIn this episode, Hanke warns of an 80% recession probability by year-end, driven by regime uncertainty from Trump's policy changes and money supply contraction since April 2022. He critiques the Federal Reserve's narrow focus on interest rates while ignoring quantitative tightening and argues for putting money supply and commercial banks back at the center of monetary policy. Hanke explains how Fed policies create wealth inequality by inflating asset prices that benefit the rich, advocating for "neutrality" as the goal of monetary policy. He dismisses Trump's "big beautiful bill" as fiscally irresponsible and calls for a constitutional convention to implement a Swiss-style debt brake. The conversation covers his new book's thesis that monetary policy should focus on money supply growth rather than interest rates, with commercial banks producing 80% of the money supply through lending.Links: Twitter/X: https://x.com/steve_hankeMaking Money Work book: https://www.amazon.com/Making-Money-Work-Rewrite-Financial/dp/139425726000:00 - Introduction of Professor Steve Hanke 01:28 - Regime uncertainty concept and Trump's policy changes 03:52 - Tariffs as taxes on international transactions 06:20 - 80% recession probability by end of year 08:31 - Money supply contraction since April 2022 10:51 - Bubble indicator and market complacency discussion 12:52 - Family call interruption from Dominican Republic 13:24 - Market in bubble territory explanation 16:11 - Federal Reserve critique and FOMC meeting outlook 18:27 - Quantitative tightening vs interest rate focus 19:04 - Three pillars of the book's thesis 25:46 - Neutrality as monetary policy objective 29:30 - How Fed policy creates wealth inequality 32:15 - Catalyst for writing the book 37:09 - "Big beautiful bill" critique and fiscal concerns 42:34 - Swiss debt brake constitutional solution 46:25 - Key prices to watch: gold, 10-year yields, dollar-euro, stocks

You can't become magnetic by bullying yourself into healing and growth. True transformation starts with radical self-acceptance — and in this episode, I'm joined by the brilliant Britt Frank to show you exactly how to do that through the powerful practice of parts work (Internal Family Systems).Britt is a licensed therapist, trauma specialist, and author of The Science of Stuck, and her story alone is a powerful testament to what it means to come home to yourself (yes, even the “worst” parts). From surviving a cult and meth addiction to becoming a voice for grounded, embodied healing, she brings both depth and practicality to what can often feel like a messy inner journey.We talk about why perfectionism in healing is a trap, how your inner critic is often just your inner child in disguise, and why integrating — not fixing — all your parts is what actually makes you magnetic. If you're ready to stop waging war on yourself and start becoming hot, healed, and whole, this episode is for you.We Chat:-Britt's story — from meth addiction in a cult to becoming a therapist-How your inner critic is actually trying to protect you-Self-parenting, parts work, and the myth of needing to “fix” yourself-Why integration (not perfection) is the key to next-level magnetism-Neutrality vs. forgiveness in healing, and why you should prioritize neutrality first-Trauma, cognitive bias, and how your brain is (believe it or not) *actually* on your side-How manifestation gets distorted by toxic positivity-How to start doing parts work and how to use tools like ChatGPT to support yourself-Why true personal power starts when you stop abandoning yourselfWhere to Find Britt:InstagramWebsiteBooksMy Instagram: @jordanlaurelle - come say hi!For coaching inquiries: jordanlaurellecoaching@gmail.com or book a discovery call HERE.Book a One-Time 75 Minute Call HERE.Sign Up for my Email List HERE.

On April 22, 2025, gunmen in the town of Pahalgam, located in the disputed region of Kashmir, killed 26 people—mostly Indian tourists. A four-day military clash between India and Pakistan ensued, bringing both countries to the brink of a full-blown war, before a ceasefire was reached on May 10, 2025. During the India-Pakistan clashes, Beijing urged both sides to deescalate and called for a “political settlement through peaceful means.” But China did not play a neutral role in the conflict. Consistent with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's purported statement to his Pakistani counterpart that “China fully understands Pakistan's legitimate security concerns and supports Pakistan in safeguarding its sovereignty and security interests,” China reportedly provided intelligence, satellite equipment, and other forms of support to Pakistan before and during the clashes.To analyze China's role in the conflict, host Bonnie Glaser is joined by Andrew Small. Andrew is a senior transatlantic fellow with GMF's Indo-Pacific program, and author of two books on China, including “The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics,” which is now ten years old, but remains an insightful and relevant study. Timestamps[00:00] Start[01:46] China's Diplomatic Response to the India-Pakistan Clashes[05:58] Beijing's Offer of Playing a “Constructive Role”[10:56] A Testing Ground for Chinese Weaponry and Equipment[14:03] China's Cautious Approach to Sino-Indian Relations[18:10] Military Support and the Sino-Pakistan Relationship[23:44] Implications for Chinese Arms Exports[26:27] Indian and Pakistani Assessments of Chinese Involvement[30:06] Influence of US-China Rivalry on India-Pakistan Relations

Unity Without Compromise with Dr. Steven LaTulippe – President Trump is no less culpable. He posted on Truth Social: "Ric [Grenell] shares my Vision for a GOLDEN AGE of American Arts and Culture, and will be overseeing the daily operations of the Center." Suddenly, I don't like the vision. Trump is playing the neutrality game. Not only is neutrality masked treason, but it is also rebellion against...

Unity Without Compromise with Dr. Steven LaTulippe – President Trump is no less culpable. He posted on Truth Social: "Ric [Grenell] shares my Vision for a GOLDEN AGE of American Arts and Culture, and will be overseeing the daily operations of the Center." Suddenly, I don't like the vision. Trump is playing the neutrality game. Not only is neutrality masked treason, but it is also rebellion against...

In this episode, I share my personal experience visiting the ancient Kom Ombo Temple in Egypt — a powerful place dedicated to duality and balance. As I reflect on the energy and symbolism of the temple, I explore how it mirrors our own inner journey: the need to embrace every part of ourselves, both light and shadow. We dive into the power of neutrality — not as indifference, but as a grounded space of acceptance, where true transformation can happen. This is an invitation to see your life without judgment and to remember that all experiences serve your evolution.

Christiane Amanpour is chief international anchor of CNN's flagship global affairs program “Amanpour,” which airs weekdays on CNN International and nightly on PBS in the United States. She is also host of “The Amanpour Hour,” and is based in the network's London bureau. Beginning in 1983 as an entry-level assistant on the international assignment desk at CNN's headquarters in Atlanta, Amanpour rose through the organization becoming a reporter at the New York bureau, and later, the network's leading international correspondent. On the ground during the siege of Sarajevo, Amanpour exposed the brutality of the Bosnian War, reporting on the daily tragedy of life for civilians in the city. She was outspoken, calling out the human rights abuses, massacres and genocide committed against the Bosnian Moslems, later saying “There are some situations one simply cannot be neutral about, because when you are neutral you are an accomplice.” Throughout her time at CNN, Amanpour has secured exclusive interviews with global power players. In the wake of the September 11 attacks she was the first international correspondent to interview British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and Afghan President Hamid Karzai. During the height of the Arab Spring she conducted an Emmy-winning interview with Libya's former leader ‘Colonel' Moammar Gadhafi, and she was also the last journalist to interview Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak just before he was deposed. In January 2014, Amanpour also exclusively broke the news of a dossier of testimony and photographs which alleged to show systematic torture of prisoners by government forces in Syria, evidence she used to confront Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev about his government's support for the Assad regime. In addition to her work as an anchor and reporter, Amanpour is an active rights campaigner. A board member of the Committee to Protect Journalists, the Centre for Public Integrity and the International Women's Media Foundation, she has used her profile to raise awareness of key global issues and journalists' rights. She has interviewed educational rights activist Malala Yousafzai for CNN on several occasions – bringing focus to her courage and international advocacy work. Amanpour has earned 16 News and Documentary Emmy Awards, four Peabody Awards, two George Polk Awards, three duPont-Columbia Awards and the IWMF's Courage in Journalism Award. She has received nine honorary degrees, is an honorary citizen of Sarajevo, and a UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador for Freedom of the Press and the Safety of Journalists. Amanpour holds a BA in Journalism from the University of Rhode Island.Ralph Ranalli of the HKS Office of Communications and Public Affairs is the host, producer, and editor of HKS PolicyCast. A former journalist, public television producer, and entrepreneur, he holds an BA in political science from UCLA and a master's in journalism from Columbia University.Scheduling and logistical support for PolicyCast is provided by Lilian Wainaina.Design and graphics support is provided by Laura King and Delane Meadows. Web design and social media promotion support is provided by Catherine Santrock and Natalie Montaner. Editorial support is provided by Nora Delaney and Robert O'Neill. 

We are honored to welcome the distinguished Dr. Stanley K. Ridgley, author of the recently released book DEI Exposed, as our guest today. Dr. Ridgley is a well-traveled and highly respected educator with a reputation for delivering insight with clarity and impact. In his book, he addresses one of the most widely discussed and contentious topics in our industry today, substantiating his arguments with well-researched factual evidence. Silence implies complicity, so Eric never shies away from tough conversations, especially with those who can back their ideas with proven facts. Join us to hear Dr. Ridgley's clear-sighted and thought-provoking perspective on the truth about DEI. What DEI Has Become The original purpose of DEI, which stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, was to ensure fairness, opportunity, and support for disadvantaged groups. However, in practice, it has evolved into something quite different. Rather than fostering genuine inclusion, DEI programs are increasingly excluding Jewish students, tolerating antisemitism, and enforcing a rigid ideological framework that leaves no room for open dialogue. The bureaucracy behind DEI has grown massive, and those running it seldom face accountability, even when harm occurs. Rot at the Core of Academia Some of the most prestigious universities, including Harvard and Columbia, fail to address this issue and even reward bad behavior. Students who harass or physically attack their Jewish peers get promoted, hired by the university, or given recognition, while the victims get overlooked. That reflects a complete collapse in moral standards, with academic freedom and intellectual honesty eroded by fear, favoritism, and ideological loyalty. Talented researchers and students are being pushed away from these institutions in search of places where truth and fairness still matter. The Silence of Feminist and LGBTQ+ Groups Organizations that claim to defend human rights, such as feminist groups and LGBTQ+ advocates, have remained noticeably silent about the rapes of Israeli women and the persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals in Palestinian territories. Yet those groups condemn Israel based on the narrative that it is a settler-colonial state. Their silence is not just disappointing. It reveals a clear double standard based on ideological alignment rather than principle. Is Ideology More Important Than Reality?  A growing trend in universities and activist spaces is to prioritize ideology over reality. People follow a script. They repeat terms like settler colonialism or perform symbolic rituals like land acknowledgments without stopping to question their meaning or validity. That mindset discourages critical thinking and turns academic spaces into nothing more than echo chambers.  Neutrality is Not Morality When people stay silent in the face of antisemitism and extremism or claim that it is too political to take a stance, they are not being neutral. They are being complicit. Avoiding uncomfortable truths out of fear of losing a job or facing criticism is understandable, but it allows injustice to flourish. Saying nothing is not a virtue. It is a form of surrender that weakens the very foundations of free and fair societies. There is a Better Way If the goal is to help disadvantaged students, there is a straightforward solution. If support is offered based on economic need, many groups that DEI aims to help could benefit, without the need for racial preferences or divisive identity politics. A financial-aid-based approach would be both legal and practical, and far more inclusive. It would also eliminate the need for bloated DEI departments that create more division than unity. Expose the Hypocrisy Loudly Change will only happen when people are willing to speak up and ask the hard questions, like Why are Jewish students being left out of DEI programs? Why are certain groups exempt from criticism even when they commit violence or uphold oppression? Why are academic institutions rewarding behavior that goes against their own stated values? Those questions are uncomfortable but necessary. The time for silence is over. Only through clarity, honesty, and courage will things improve. Dr. Ridgley's Bio and Resume' Connect with Eric Rozenberg On LinkedIn Facebook Instagram Website Listen to The Business of Meetings podcast Subscribe to The Business of Meetings newsletter Connect with Stanley K. Ridgley On his website LinkedIn   LeBow College of Business (Drexel University)

This episode of Justice Above All examines how the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), and how today's legal arguments decontextualize the Amendment's historical context in which it was ratified—during Reconstruction, to secure full citizenship and legal equality for formerly enslaved Black people.  Today, multiple Supreme Court decisions reflect an inaccurate and ahistorical reading of the Reconstruction Amendments—the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth—which were enacted to dismantle the legacy of slavery and secure full citizenship and equal protection under the law for all people of African descent.Today's host is Karla McKanders, Director of the Thurgood Marshall Institute. She is in conversation with the following guests: - Lynne Adrine: Alumna, Ludlow Elementary School and President, LKA Strategies- Joel Motley: Civil and human rights advocate, filmmaker, and the son of Constance Baker Motle- Kenji Yoshino: Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, NYU School of Law and Faculty Director, Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and BelongingFor more information on this episode, please visit https://tminstituteldf.org/brown-v-board-ii-fourteenth-amendment-myth-of-neutrality/.This episode was produced by Jakiyah Bradley and Lauren O'Neil. It was hosted by Karla McKanders. Resonate Recordings edited the episode.If you enjoyed this episode please consider leaving a review and helping others find it! To keep up with the work of LDF please visit our website at www.naacpldf.org and follow us on social media at @naacp_ldf. To keep up with the work of the Thurgood Marshall Institute, please visit our website at www.tminstituteldf.org and follow us on Twitter at @tmi_ldf.

Send us a textWe explore the groundbreaking concept of the Chief Consciousness Officer with Charlie Johnson, examining how this emerging role could transform businesses, politics, and human development by accessing the fundamental consciousness that underlies everything.• Consciousness should be recognized as everything, not just a spiritual concept – it encompasses physical and non-physical reality, business, politics, and personal development• The mind is merely the "middleman" that creates division by forcing us to choose sides, while consciousness is the neutral source of everything• Chief Consciousness Officers will become as essential to organizations as Chief Technology Officers, helping companies access broader perspectives beyond division• Our beliefs and perspectives are largely shaped by conditioning rather than objective truth – where you're born largely determines your political and religious views• Social media has become more addictive than drugs, causing us to check our phones "like crack addicts" while presenting a carefully curated self-image• Artificial intelligence isn't actually artificial – it's a product of human consciousness that we're now fearing despite using AI-driven conveniences daily• The path forward requires neutrality and expanded awareness rather than continuing the same divisive approaches that have failed throughout human historyConnect with Charlie Johnson on LinkedIn to learn more about the Chief Consciousness Officer role and how it could help your organization or personal development.Support the showFollow your host atYouTube and Rumble for video contenthttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUxk1oJBVw-IAZTqChH70aghttps://rumble.com/c/c-4236474Facebook to receive updateshttps://www.facebook.com/EliasEllusion/Twitter (yes, I refuse to call it X)https://x.com/politicallyht LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/eliasmarty/

Last March, a community health activist in Myanmar published a warning about escalating violence. By Wednesday, it vanished, flagged, filtered, and disappeared by content algorithms she'll never meet, applying standards she wasn't shown, through processes no one can appeal. Halfway across the world that same day, a political influencer with ten million followers posted similar warnings. His remained visible, amplified, promoted. These decisions join the 3.8 billion moderation verdicts algorithms make daily. According to industry data, 94% receive no human review whatsoever. More telling still: 28% of posts containing keywords like "protest" or "rally" face automatic temporary visibility restrictions, with the severity varying by geographic origin data. Neither decision was explained. Neither was argued before judges or juries. There were no briefs filed, nor precedents cited, no dissenting opinions. Just lines of code executing their silent calculus of who deserves to be heard. We've replaced courthouse steps with server farms, legal arguments with machine learning parameters, and public deliberation with proprietary algorithms. This isn't simply a technological upgrade. It's a fundamental restructuring of how expression is governed, who holds the power to silence, and which voices carry. Content moderation algorithms don't just enforce rules; they write the rules by deciding which enforcement patterns become normalized. The EU Digital Services Act requires platforms to publish content moderation statistics. Fourth-quarter numbers showed 217 million removed posts globally. Researcher access to raw data remains restricted. Three platforms have faced preliminary fines for non-compliance with transparency requirements. Four have challenged these fines successfully. The tech companies building these systems operate in a curious gray zone: too powerful to be mere platforms, too unaccountable to be proper governments, yet exercising authority that rivals both. Meta moderates more speech daily than all courts globally combined. Since 2021, Trust and Safety teams at major platforms have shrunk by an average of 72%, even as moderation decisions continue to multiply. This selective enforcement isn't a bug in the system of algorithmic governance. It might be its defining feature. Let's take a closer look at who gets silenced and who doesn't. Twitter (I Refuse to Call It by That Single-Letter Rebrand) - A Broken Dream of Neutrality and Algorithmic Fairness There was a lot of speculation around the intentions and goals of Elon Musk when he wanted to buy Twitter, which he rebranded as Twitter. It promised a "free speech absolutist" utopia. Instead, it exposed a stark reality: AI content moderation is a tool of selective enforcement. Musk swiftly reinstated banned accounts, including those of Donald Trump and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, while touting algorithmic transparency. Ironically, the latter was even more controversial, considering Alex Jones's involvement in the lawsuit regarding the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Yet, within months, Twitter quietly rolled back these policies under advertiser pressure, banning critics like journalist Aaron Rupar for "abusive behavior" while allowing far-right influencers like Andrew Tate to thrive. This naturally raised questions about Elon Musk's commitment to free-speech, considering the double standards on its implementation on the platform. This flip-flop epitomizes a broader pattern across tech platforms: public claims of neutrality mask opaque, politically convenient enforcement that privileges tech elites and MAGA-aligned voices. A separate yet still worth considering fact was that one of the first decisions after Twitter's acquisition was firing roughly 80% of the staff (particularly engineers) working in Trust and Safety. The worst part is this trend is not limited to Twitter. Other platforms are using content moderation to benefit certain groups while marginalizing others. Me...

This is a recording of a live guided meditation.  The meditation guide and the members of the public who joined the meditation used the Zoom platform.   Even though you are listening to this meditation as a recording rather than attending live, in the world of consciousness, there is no time or space. Meaning, regardless of when you listen, you are in a meditation with a large group of folks from different walks of life and places on the planet.Meditation Guide: Judy Hunter, Master meditation guide and seasoned teacher and trainer for the Divine Spark Program.Judy's Meditation Guide Style: Rich, musical tone to her voice.  Inspiring imagery and clear guidance makes possible going deep into your center safely and joyfully.Content: Features these tools and techniques:Grounding (Earth Connection)ReleasingCenteringIntentional BreathingCenter of Head AwarenessFinding the energy flow of universal consciousness within you, then stepping into itTraveling within your energy architecture -- moving point of awareness through 1-12 chakras Intention setting Bringing your life energy into harmony with your divine/universal self

PJ Coogan hears Mary Lou McDonald get passionate about Ireland's neutrality ahead of her meeting in Cork, talks to KellyAnn who says tampering with lifebuoys costs lives, listens to Melissa explain why she needs help to end her daughter's agony. And more... Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On today's episode we examine how broader shifts in the global order, globalization and geopolitical trends since the end of the Cold War led to the current European security crisis and political context for the Russo-Ukraine War. We also explore how this context shapes Georgia's geopolitical and security environment, and is sowing the seeds for more open discussions about what geopolitical neutrality and explicit multi-vectorism could mean for Georgia. With guest co-host Beka Natsvlishvili, we welcome Richard Sakwa on to Reimagining Soviet Georgia. Richard Sakwa is Emeritus Professor of Politics at the University of Kent, U.K. His research interests include: political developments in Russia, international politics and the Second Cold War, multipolarity and global realignments, prospects for socialism, problems of European and global order, the English School and international systems. A description of Sakwa's recent book The Lost Peace: How the West Failed to Prevent a Second Cold War (2023, Yale University Press) below:The end of the Cold War was an opportunity—our inability to seize it has led to today's renewed era of great power competition The year 1989 heralded a unique prospect for an enduring global peace as harsh ideological divisions and conflicts began to be resolved. Now, three decades on, that peace has been lost. With war in Ukraine and increasing tensions between China, Russia, and the West, great power politics once again dominates the world stage. But could it have been different? Richard Sakwa shows how the years before the first mass invasion of Ukraine represented a hiatus in conflict rather than a lasting accord—and how, since then, we have been in a “Second Cold War.” Tracing the mistakes on both sides that led to the current crisis, Sakwa considers the resurgence of China and Russia and the disruptions and ambitions of the liberal order that opened up catastrophic new lines of conflict. This is a vital, strongly argued account of how the world lost its chance at peace, and instead saw the return of war in Europe, global rivalries, and nuclear brinksmanship.

Britain's declaration of neutrality recognised the Union and the Confederacy as belligerents, allowing the Confederacy to contract for supplies and commission warships, but it fell short of recognising the Confederacy as a sovereign nation. This protected British interests by avoiding entanglement in the conflict while maintaining the country's right to trade with both the Union and the ...

Send us a textEver find yourself saying things you don't mean… or going completely silent because it feels like nothing will help?You're not alone. When emotions run high, we don't default to communication, we default to survival.In this episode of Love Shack Live, we're pulling back the curtain on one of the most important (and overlooked) relationship skills: how to regulate your emotional state before you try to “fix” the conversation.You'll learn:The two emotional survival modes we all fall into, Control and Collapse, and how to recognize yoursWhy communication tips don't work when your nervous system is in overdriveWhat the “Window of Neutrality” is, and how to stay inside itThe real reason your conversations keep going sideways (it's not what you think)

Jerry spoke to Niamh Ní Bhriain who’s one of the organisers of the Neutrality Roadshow. They’re holding an event in Pobalscoil Inbhear Scéine, Kenmare tomorrow night and on Monday, May 12th at 6pm, they will be in Ballylongford. The group is adamant that the triple lock should be maintained – this means that after gaining approval from the Government and Dáil to send our defence forces abroad, approval is also needed from the UN Security Council. The five permanent members of the security council are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Nesta conversa comprovei minha percepção de que em nosso planeta não existem fronteiras. Ao remover todos os bloqueios históricos e ideias equivocadas que nos afastam de culturas, povos, idiomas e crenças diferentes, podemos de fato abraçar terras estrangeiras que nos acolhem e viver integralmente as belezas de uma jornada de patriotismo global. Convido a todos para conhecer David Saunders, um inglês com espírito livre, fez uma carreira lindíssima nas Organizações das Nações Unidas, gerenciando importantes projetos em diversas áreas para o desenvolvimento econômico e social, integração e bem-estar de populações no Sudão do Sul, Albania, Cazaquistão, Bosnia e Herzegovina, Kenia, Malasia, Uganda, Oman, Qatar, Paquistão, Brasil entre outros. Depois dessa breve introdução, nos resta sentar com calma e curiosidade para tentar aprender lições de resiliência, humildade, sagacidade e empatia de quem viveu 500 anos em seus reluzentes 60, agora aposentado em terras Portuguesas se dedica aos prazeres refinados dos jogos de tabuleiro, a mesa de bilhar, uma boa cerveja na pressão e a conversar com seus amigos multi-nacionais. Neutralidade, simplicidade, amizades e bons relacionamentos e identificar o mito que afasta da missão são chaves para o sucesso sempre. Venha navegar pelas ondas das nações distantes dos eixos turísticos para entender o que é de fato ser Expatriado, trabalhar, viver, entregar-se a rotina de países exóticos, entender o significado da palavra missão, quando e onde o valor das coisas simples amplificam o significado do bem-estar individual e coletivo. (EN) LIVING ABROAD, FROM EMPLOYEE TO RETIRED In this conversation I confirmed my perception that Earth hasn’t had borders. By removing all historical bias and mistaken ideas which separate one from another cultures, peoples, languages ​​and beliefs, we can truly embrace foreign lands that welcome us and fully experience the beauty of a journey of global patriotism. I invite everyone to meet David Saunders, a British with a free spirit, who made an outstanding career in United Nations, managing important projects in various areas for economic and social development, integration and well-being of populations in South Sudan, Albania, Kazakhstan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kenya, Malaysia, Uganda, Oman, Qatar, Pakistan, Brazil, among others. After this brief introduction, we can only sit down relaxed and curious to try to learn lessons of resilience, humility, sagacity and empathy from someone who lived 500 years in his shining 60s, now retired in Portuguese lands, dedicating himself to refined pleasures of board games, pool table, good draft beers and chatting with his multinational friends. Come sailing the waves of nations far from the tourist hubs to understand what it really is living as an expatriate, working, dedicating yourself to the routine of exotic countries, understanding the meaning of “mission”, when and where the value of simple things amplifies the meaning of individual and collective well-being. Neutrality, simplicity, friendships and good relationships and identifying the myth that takes you away from your mission are always keys to success. Acompanhe o Tábula Rasa nas redes sociais:– Facebook– Instagram– LinkedIn– Threads– X/Twitter– YouTube Ouça o Tábula Rasa nos principais agregadores:- Spotify- Apple Podcasts- Deezer- Amazon Music- PocketCasts O Tabula Rasa é produzido pela Rádiofobia Podcast e Multimídia e publicado pela Rádiofobia Podcast Network.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Diarmaid Ferriter, Professor of Modern Irish History at UCD 

Some believe the world is a 'neutral' place.But they're wrong.The world is filled with light and shadow; good and evil, angels and demons.The world is not neutral. It is spiritually polarized.And that's just what Jesus told His disciples in John 15.

Some believe the world is a ‘neutral' place. But they're wrong. The world is filled with light and shadow; good and evil, angels and demons. The world is not neutral. It is spiritually polarized. And that's just what Jesus told His disciples in John 15.

Some believe the world is a ‘neutral' place. But they're wrong. The world is filled with light and shadow; good and evil, angels and demons. The world is not neutral. It is spiritually polarized. And that's just what Jesus told His disciples in John 15.

Some believe the world is a ‘neutral' place. But they're wrong. The world is filled with light and shadow; good and evil, angels and demons. The world is not neutral. It is spiritually polarized. And that's just what Jesus told His disciples in John 15.

Some believe the world is a ‘neutral' place. But they're wrong. The world is filled with light and shadow; good and evil, angels and demons. The world is not neutral. It is spiritually polarized. And that's just what Jesus told His disciples in John 15.

Some believe the world is a ‘neutral' place. But they're wrong. The world is filled with light and shadow; good and evil, angels and demons. The world is not neutral. It is spiritually polarized. And that's just what Jesus told His disciples in John 15.

What if the money you want isn't far away—it's just outside of your current identity? In this episode, I'm sharing the newly expanded five-part Spiritual Investor Method. This isn't a linear process—it's a circular framework designed to collapse time between when you desire wealth and when you actually receive it. I talk about what money neutrality really is (and isn't), how to stop recreating the past with your financial decisions, and how to break the structure within yourself that's keeping wealth at arm's length. This isn't about waiting for money to come—it's about becoming the version of you who already holds it with ease. If you've been feeling frustrated with your income or like you're on the edge of something big but can't quite access it yet, this episode will help you realign with the next level of you. Because you don't need more plans—you need a different relationship with time, energy, and who you believe yourself to be. Learn more and join us at TheSpiritualInvestor.com

How deep does the rabbit hole go when seeking spiritual guidance? What happens when the mentor you trusted becomes the source of terrifying manipulation?In a pivotal episode of the Bewitched series, therapist Audrey Hilliker shares her harrowing journey into the inner circle of Betty. Expecting growth and Akashic Records training, Audrey instead found herself trapped in a high-control environment marked by public shaming, gaslighting, and escalating demands.   Audrey recounts the chilling climax during the retreat in Croatia, descending into a nightmare of intense paranoia, induced deprivation, and absolute control. Suspicions of being drugged surface as reality itself seems to warp. How did a respected professional begin questioning her own sanity, even her closest relationships?You will not believe what Audrey's husband discovered about Betty and her true identity. It's an international complex situation which will make your jaw drop and question if Betty was one of the Devil's own closest allies.TODAY'S HIGHLIGHTS(00:00) Intro(00:54) In Today's Episode...Audrey Hilliker(05:19) Past Lives and Money(12:46)  Initial Red Flags: A $10K Spiritual Betrayal(16:59)  Akashic Record Rip-Off(22:53) Gaslighting Guru - "Neutrality" Cuts Deep(33:09) Coaching Copycat: My Words, Her Gain?(38:28) The Croatia Calling(43:32) Manipulation in Paradise(55:10) We're Trapped: Control, Isolation, and a Husband's Fear(59:38) Betty's True Nature - Darkest Secrets Revealed(01:18:50) Cult Awakening(01:24:31) The 20-Minute Voicenote: My Truth Goes Viral (01:27:02) Relief, Release, and a Dark Truth(01:31:52) The Demonic Possession Case Study and The Tetrad(01:41:42) Audrey's Final Thoughts**WAYS TO ENTER MY WORLD**  When you leave a review of the podcast, send us a screenshot and we'll send you a $250 credit, you can apply to anything else in my world.  Past Lives & Money You can still jump in. I show you how to clear the past life trauma that comes up for most spiritual women. Sign up before April 15 to get 50% OFFThe Metamorphosis starts its next round in May. This is my groundbreaking, flagship program, and the path to discover your deeper purpose. Start making money doing what you love. CONTACT AUDREYIG embodied.soleilLinkedInCONTACT ROBYN drrobynmckay.com Follow her on InstagramListen to her podcast She{ology}CONTACT ALYSEJoin my FB group Financial Freedom for Spiritual EntrepreneursFollow and DM me on IG @alyse_breathesVisit alysebreathes.comOr mail me info@alysebreathes.com

Pontius Pilate knew Jesus was innocent, yet he chose to placate the people rather than release Him. But the courage he lacked, you can show today. Notes: Focus verses - John 18, 19 By definition, a coward is someone who lacks the courage to face difficult or painful things. Pontius Pilate saw an angry crowd that threatened his position.He was more afraid of the consequences than he was of God. #1 The Prefect Meets the PerfectJohn 18:28-38 Jesus, the PERFECT Son of God stands before Pontius Pilate, the Roman appointed PREFECT Governor of Judea. Prefect Governor means he was a military focused governor. The religious leaders knew exactly what they were doing when they brought Jesus to Pilate. The man known for using power harshly becomes hesitant and weak when confronted by Jesus. “What is truth?” Jesus was the incarnation of truth. Read verse 37.Jesus came to bring truth. Truth divides. Like Pilate, we all must make a decision regarding Jesus. Neutrality is not an option. Pilate attempts to appeal to the crowd logically, in an attempt to get Jesus released. #2 Pilate BlinksJohn 18:39-19:6 Just like Neville Chamberlain blinked in the face of tyranny, Pilate blinks in the face of Truth. He knows Jesus is innocent.But instead of releasing Jesus, he tries to placate the people. Pilate offers the crowd a choice: Jesus or Barabbas. No better picture of the gospel than this right here. The cross Barabbas was to die on was already constructed, the arrangements were made, and he had hours left to live. Barabbas was guilty, but Jesus was innocent. This is what Jesus has done for us.We’ve committed a crime by violating God’s commands, we’re guilty, and the penalty is death. But God made a way for us to be delivered out of death, out of our guilt, and that’s what Jesus ultimately did on the cross. 2 Corinthians 5:21 Jesus took Barabbas’ place on that cross. The crowd chooses Barabbas. Pilate didn’t need any Passover custom to release an innocent man, he just needed to do what was right. When the crowd decided against Jesus, he thought he might have one more trick up his sleeve. He released Barabbas, and scourged Jesus in hopes it'd satisfy the angry crowd. Pilate brought Jesus out one final time. He thought that if he give the crowd a little bit of what they want they’ll be happy, they’ll change their minds, they’ll reverse course.Pilate blinked. He thought he could use diplomacy and compromise to get himself out of a difficult position. Compromise doesn’t calm the mob, it fuels it. Compromise is part of life.But when it comes to THE Truth, when it comes to Christ, compromise should not be part of the equation. To compromise on who Jesus is, is to invent another Jesus. Only the real Jesus saves. Pilate’s appeasement of the crowd is not just a political failure—it’s a picture of what happens when leaders, Christians, and even churches try to compromise truth to satisfy the demands of culture. If you play both sides, offering a little truth, softened by a lot of concession and mix in some human empathy, and you end up with the crucifixion. A complete and utter rejection of everything Jesus is and was. We cannot untether EMPATHY from TRUTH. Just because someone feels a certain way does not mean we abandon truth. As Christians we are called to offer COMPASSION not COMPROMISE. Let’s bring this message to a close now. Read John 19:12–16 #3 Pilate judged the Judge. Pilate crucifies Him.The fear of man outweighed the fear of God. Jesus threatened to disrupt Pilate’s cushy role, and so he gave in to peer pressure and he judged the Judge. In Revelation 20 at the Great White Throne judgement, the judged will face the Judge. Pilate symbolically washed his hands of Jesus.But you cannot wash yourself of your sins. You either receive Him or reject Him. “You are either for me or against me.” Have you trusted Jesus as Savior and made Him the Lord of your life? The courage that Pilate lacked, you can show today. Jesus said "Everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven" (Matthew 10:32 NLT) We are just like Barabbas.Guilty and headed for judgement.But Jesus came in, not accidentally, but intentionally and took that punishment we deserved and He died on a cross for our sin. Like those soldiers around Jack Lucas, he dove on those grenades and absorbed their destruction, that’s what Jesus did for us!He absorbed God’s righteous judgement and drank the cup of His wrath that was going to be poured out on us because of our spiritual rebellion against God. --- Learn more about Greg Laurie and Harvest Ministries at harvest.org. This podcast is supported by the generosity of our Harvest Partners.Support the show: https://harvest.org/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Pontius Pilate knew Jesus was innocent, yet he chose to placate the people rather than release Him. But the courage he lacked, you can show today. Notes: Focus verses - John 18, 19 By definition, a coward is someone who lacks the courage to face difficult or painful things. Pontius Pilate saw an angry crowd that threatened his position.He was more afraid of the consequences than he was of God. #1 The Prefect Meets the PerfectJohn 18:28-38 Jesus, the PERFECT Son of God stands before Pontius Pilate, the Roman appointed PREFECT Governor of Judea. Prefect Governor means he was a military focused governor. The religious leaders knew exactly what they were doing when they brought Jesus to Pilate. The man known for using power harshly becomes hesitant and weak when confronted by Jesus. “What is truth?” Jesus was the incarnation of truth. Read verse 37.Jesus came to bring truth. Truth divides. Like Pilate, we all must make a decision regarding Jesus. Neutrality is not an option. Pilate attempts to appeal to the crowd logically, in an attempt to get Jesus released. #2 Pilate BlinksJohn 18:39-19:6 Just like Neville Chamberlain blinked in the face of tyranny, Pilate blinks in the face of Truth. He knows Jesus is innocent.But instead of releasing Jesus, he tries to placate the people. Pilate offers the crowd a choice: Jesus or Barabbas. No better picture of the gospel than this right here. The cross Barabbas was to die on was already constructed, the arrangements were made, and he had hours left to live. Barabbas was guilty, but Jesus was innocent. This is what Jesus has done for us.We’ve committed a crime by violating God’s commands, we’re guilty, and the penalty is death. But God made a way for us to be delivered out of death, out of our guilt, and that’s what Jesus ultimately did on the cross. 2 Corinthians 5:21 Jesus took Barabbas’ place on that cross. The crowd chooses Barabbas. Pilate didn’t need any Passover custom to release an innocent man, he just needed to do what was right. When the crowd decided against Jesus, he thought he might have one more trick up his sleeve. He released Barabbas, and scourged Jesus in hopes it'd satisfy the angry crowd. Pilate brought Jesus out one final time. He thought that if he give the crowd a little bit of what they want they’ll be happy, they’ll change their minds, they’ll reverse course.Pilate blinked. He thought he could use diplomacy and compromise to get himself out of a difficult position. Compromise doesn’t calm the mob, it fuels it. Compromise is part of life.But when it comes to THE Truth, when it comes to Christ, compromise should not be part of the equation. To compromise on who Jesus is, is to invent another Jesus. Only the real Jesus saves. Pilate’s appeasement of the crowd is not just a political failure—it’s a picture of what happens when leaders, Christians, and even churches try to compromise truth to satisfy the demands of culture. If you play both sides, offering a little truth, softened by a lot of concession and mix in some human empathy, and you end up with the crucifixion. A complete and utter rejection of everything Jesus is and was. We cannot untether EMPATHY from TRUTH. Just because someone feels a certain way does not mean we abandon truth. As Christians we are called to offer COMPASSION not COMPROMISE. Let’s bring this message to a close now. Read John 19:12–16 #3 Pilate judged the Judge. Pilate crucifies Him.The fear of man outweighed the fear of God. Jesus threatened to disrupt Pilate’s cushy role, and so he gave in to peer pressure and he judged the Judge. In Revelation 20 at the Great White Throne judgement, the judged will face the Judge. Pilate symbolically washed his hands of Jesus.But you cannot wash yourself of your sins. You either receive Him or reject Him. “You are either for me or against me.” Have you trusted Jesus as Savior and made Him the Lord of your life? The courage that Pilate lacked, you can show today. Jesus said "Everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven" (Matthew 10:32 NLT) We are just like Barabbas.Guilty and headed for judgement.But Jesus came in, not accidentally, but intentionally and took that punishment we deserved and He died on a cross for our sin. Like those soldiers around Jack Lucas, he dove on those grenades and absorbed their destruction, that’s what Jesus did for us!He absorbed God’s righteous judgement and drank the cup of His wrath that was going to be poured out on us because of our spiritual rebellion against God. --- Learn more about Greg Laurie and Harvest Ministries at harvest.org. This podcast is supported by the generosity of our Harvest Partners.Support the show: https://harvest.org/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.