Podcasts about neutrality

Your morning briefing. All the news you need to start your day.On today's podcast:(1) A global selloff in semiconductor stocks deepened as investors retreated from one of the year’s hottest trades amid elevated bond yields and geopolitical uncertainty. Treasuries gained modestly following recent losses.(2) US President Donald Trump insisted Tuesday that there were no talks ongoing with Iran, leaving the simmering conflict in the Middle East and control of the Strait of Hormuz stuck in limbo.(3) The Trump administration delayed 50% tariffs on billions of dollars of Canadian products for three days, saying the two sides had reached a tentative agreement to resolve a broader trade dispute that had plunged relations to a fresh low.(4) Swiss voters are set to reject an initiative to strengthen the country’s neutrality in a ballot next month that Russia has tried to sway with jibes about the country’s actions during World War II.(5) Rising temperatures in the ocean now have the potential to cause intense storms in Europe later this year, according to new research.(6) A high-ranking FIFA council member has withdrawn his support for Gianni Infantino, citing the dismissal of fellow executive Kevin Lamour as the “final straw.”(7) Investors are throwing their support behind Ukraine and pocketing some of the most lucrative gains in bond markets.Podcast Conversation: LinkedIn Users Are Rewriting the Past to Land JobsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

With war in Europe, should Switzerland take a stricter approach to its neutrality stance? As campaigning starts on the Neutrality Initiative, we discuss how it could impact the Alpine nation’s standing in the world. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The following article of the Tech industry is: “Digital Neutrality in 2025: Mexico's Tax Reforms” by Luis Lopez Linaldi, Founding Partner, Solorzano Linaldi.

Most of us were raised to think of the public square as religiously neutral territory. School is just school. Law is just law. Science reports the facts and leaves the value judgments to us. Joe, Michael, and Nate spend this episode arguing that none of that holds up, and that Christians have paid a heavy price for believing it. They start with what a worldview actually is and why nobody gets to opt out of having one. Underneath any reading of the world sit answers to a few unavoidable questions: who God is, what a human being is, where morality comes from, what history is for. Those answers don't vanish when a culture stops going to church. They get relocated. Secularism has its own answers, and it enforces them. A good stretch of the conversation goes to where this shows up in practice: curriculum, legislation, news coverage, research funding, family life, politics, the arts. Along the way they draw a distinction that's easy to miss. Christians can and should use tools that unbelievers built. The trouble starts when they take on the foundations along with the tools. The objections get their turn too. Can't we just meet on common ground? Isn't this too black and white? Does it mean Christians can't cooperate with anyone? And the one that comes up most often: isn't secular government neutral by definition? The answer to that last one is that every legal order enforces some moral vision. The only question is whose.

Most of us were raised to think of the public square as religiously neutral territory. Joe, Michael, and Nate spend this episode arguing that none of that holds up, and that Christians have paid a heavy price for believing it.

Most of us were raised to think of the public square as religiously neutral territory. Joe, Michael, and Nate spend this episode arguing that none of that holds up, and that Christians have paid a heavy price for believing it.

Most of us were raised to think of the public square as religiously neutral territory. School is just school. Law is just law. Science reports the facts and leaves the value judgments to us. Joe, Michael, and Nate spend this episode arguing that none of that holds up, and that Christians have paid a heavy price for believing it. They start with what a worldview actually is and why nobody gets to opt out of having one. Underneath any reading of the world sit answers to a few unavoidable questions: who God is, what a human being is, where morality comes from, what history is for. Those answers don't vanish when a culture stops going to church. They get relocated. Secularism has its own answers, and it enforces them. A good stretch of the conversation goes to where this shows up in practice: curriculum, legislation, news coverage, research funding, family life, politics, the arts. Along the way they draw a distinction that's easy to miss. Christians can and should use tools that unbelievers built. The trouble starts when they take on the foundations along with the tools. The objections get their turn too. Can't we just meet on common ground? Isn't this too black and white? Does it mean Christians can't cooperate with anyone? And the one that comes up most often: isn't secular government neutral by definition? The answer to that last one is that every legal order enforces some moral vision. The only question is whose.

Most of us were raised to think of the public square as religiously neutral territory. School is just school. Law is just law. Science reports the facts and leaves the value judgments to us. Joe, Michael, and Nate spend this episode arguing that none of that holds up, and that Christians have paid a heavy price for believing it. They start with what a worldview actually is and why nobody gets to opt out of having one. Underneath any reading of the world sit answers to a few unavoidable questions: who God is, what a human being is, where morality comes from, what history is for. Those answers don't vanish when a culture stops going to church. They get relocated. Secularism has its own answers, and it enforces them. A good stretch of the conversation goes to where this shows up in practice: curriculum, legislation, news coverage, research funding, family life, politics, the arts. Along the way they draw a distinction that's easy to miss. Christians can and should use tools that unbelievers built. The trouble starts when they take on the foundations along with the tools. The objections get their turn too. Can't we just meet on common ground? Isn't this too black and white? Does it mean Christians can't cooperate with anyone? And the one that comes up most often: isn't secular government neutral by definition? The answer to that last one is that every legal order enforces some moral vision. The only question is whose.

Most of us were raised to think of the public square as religiously neutral territory. Joe, Michael, and Nate spend this episode arguing that none of that holds up, and that Christians have paid a heavy price for believing it.

Neutrality can get you through a tough conversation, but it rarely gets you anywhere. Joshua Johnson, actor/anchor for “The Onion” and former NPR host, makes the case instead for objectivity — parking your own opinions for a moment so you can focus on someone else's story. He shares three quick ways to turn your most frustrating conversations into real understanding. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

To be a serious follower of The Lord Jesus is not what some people call a “gray area”. In Matthew 5:14-16, The Lord Jesus said to His disciples in the Sermon on the Mount, "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven."These words of Jesus are contrary to the unbiblical doctrine of the “closet Christian”. There is no such thing taught in Scripture. In Matthew 10:32, 33 Jesus said, "Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven." In this study in the gospel of John, the lines of separation between those who embrace Jesus as Lord and Christ and those who reject Him are revealed.That same separation is true in our day as well. In Matthew 10:34-39, The Lord Jesus said, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it."The division that a full commitment to Jesus Christ causes is inevitable, because when an individual or a society rejects the final authority of Scripture as the basis of doctrine and daily living and matters concerning holy living, they inevitably will be at variance against those who proclaim the moral darkness of this fallen world system and the truth that Scripture reveals about the I AM claims of Christ.Beloved reader, who or what is your master? Who or what determines what you believe about Jesus? Scripture exhorts you to choose this day whom you will serve. No person can serve two masters. To choose to follow Jesus as Lord and Saviour is to choose eternal life. To choose to reject to follow Jesus as Lord and Saviour is to choose eternal damnation. Those are not my words, they are the words of Jesus Himself.Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. (John 14:6). For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord (Romans 6:23) SelahKoinonia FellowshipSundays at 8:30a and 10:30a500 Main St. East Rochester, NY 14445koinoniafellowship.com

The Good Fortune Show with Iyer Tune Into Good Fortune: Wishes, Appreciation, and the Mirror of the Universe Sugandhii Iyer explores manifestation through the Law of Attraction, explaining how wishes, appreciation, dislike, neutrality, and the mirror effect shape what people continue to experience and attract. Tuning Into the Frequency of Good Fortune In this episode of The Good Fortune Show, Sugandhii Iyer frames manifestation as a process of “tuning” into energy, much like tuning a radio or television to a chosen station. She explains that the universe offers many possible energies and experiences, and that people use free will to tune into what they want, what they appreciate, or what they repeatedly focus on. The corrected transcript notes that the spiritual and manifestation teachings are preserved as the host's perspective, with no outside fact-checking or independent verification performed. Free Will, Choice, and the Crossroads Sugandhii emphasizes that life is not simply fatalistic. Rather than saying everything is fixed by fate, she suggests that people may have tuned into certain patterns for a long time and then mistaken the results for destiny. She contrasts her own earlier life, where she says she was born into a loving family and good circumstances without consciously using the Law of Attraction, with her present ability to make more intentional choices. She describes this as standing at a crossroads, where contrast helps reveal which path feels better and which choices should be left behind. The Four Energetic Forces: Wish, Appreciation, Dislike, and Mirror Effect The central teaching of the episode is built around four concepts: wish, appreciation, dislike, and the mirror effect. A wish is something a person wants or asks for. Appreciation is the joyful recognition of something beautiful, pleasing, delicious, attractive, or enjoyable. Dislike is the emotional reaction to something unwanted. The mirror effect, as Sugandhii explains it, is the universe reflecting back the dominant feeling or vibration a person sends out, whether that feeling is appreciation or aversion. Aladdin, the Genie, and Unlimited Wishes Sugandhii uses the story of Aladdin and the magic lamp, especially as discussed in The Secret, to explain how she understands the universe's response to desire. In this metaphor, Aladdin represents the person making the request, the genie represents the universe or the Law of Attraction, and the phrase “your wish is my command” becomes a symbol of how thoughts, words, and actions are answered. Sugandhii stresses that, in the version she references, there is no limit to the number of wishes. Life, in her view, is not restricted to three chances; people can continue asking, choosing, and creating. Wishing Lightly Versus Wanting From Lack A key refinement in Sugandhii's teaching is the difference between asking lightly and wanting desperately. She says a wish should not be loaded with heavy emotion, desperation, or the feeling of not having. For example, if someone sees beautiful curtains and simply wishes for them, the universe can respond to that request. But if the person focuses on never having enough money, never being able to buy good curtains, or feeling deprived, then the stronger vibration becomes lack rather than desire. In that case, she says the universe mirrors back more experiences of not having. Appreciation as a Creative Power Sugandhii spends much of the episode explaining appreciation as one of the most powerful and enjoyable ways to create. When people admire beautiful trees, handsome men, beautiful women, artwork, delicious food, clean malls, luxury hotels, impressive architecture, tunnels, scenery, clothing, fashion, family time, or even a good meal, they generate feelings of happiness and enjoyment. Sugandhii teaches that the universe registers those feelings and reflects back more reasons to feel appreciation. She encourages listeners to actively notice things they like because the energy of liking can grow stronger the more it is practiced. The Dislike Effect and Why Neutrality Matters Sugandhii also warns that dislike can become creative in the same way appreciation can. She repeatedly uses traffic as an example, saying that the more she dislikes dangerous or chaotic traffic, the more the universe reflects back reasons to keep disliking it. Because jumping directly from dislike to positivity can be difficult, she recommends first moving into neutrality. Becoming neutral, in her view, interrupts the strong emotional charge of aversion and makes it easier to climb toward appreciation or a better-feeling focus. Learning How the Universe “Receives” Feelings The episode repeatedly compares the Law of Attraction to an impartial force like gravity. Sugandhii says the universe does not judge whether someone “should” want something or “should” dislike something. It simply responds to the strongest vibration being sent out. She urges listeners to understand how the “equipment” works: thoughts, words, actions, likes, dislikes, appreciation, lack, and aversion all communicate something to the universe. The practical challenge, then, is learning to send the signal one actually wants reflected back. Choosing What to Like Toward the end of the episode, Sugandhii encourages listeners to deliberately increase the number of things they like. She gives examples from food, fashion, scenery, travel, family time, hotels, restaurants, shiny clothes, rhinestones, eyelashes, burgers, pizza, pasta, Indian food, Mexican food, vegetables, drinks, ice cream, and beautiful places to visit. Her point is not that everyone must like the same things, but that the world contains countless opportunities for appreciation. By filling the system with more “like energy,” she says people invite the universe to bring them more experiences they can enjoy. Contrast, Privilege, and Personal Choice Sugandhii acknowledges contrast in the world, including poverty, war zones, homelessness, and great wealth existing at the same time. She uses these contrasts to argue that people should choose which side of experience they want to tune into, while being careful not to over-identify with suffering in a way that creates more reasons to feel sorrow or lack. She presents compassion as valuable, but cautions that too much emotional focus on suffering can cause the universe to reflect back more opportunities for compassion through hardship. Closing Invitation to Look for More to Appreciate Sugandhii closes by telling listeners to look for more things they can like and appreciate throughout the coming week. Her final message is that people can tune themselves toward good fortune by noticing what they enjoy, moving away from unnecessary dislike, becoming neutral when positivity feels unreachable, and filling their lives with more appreciation. She signs off by wishing viewers a fantastic rest of the week and inviting them to continue the conversation on the next manifestation-focused broadcast.

In this week's Legal Speak episode, Law.com reporter Alex Anteau and Cox Enterprises Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer Jennifer Hightower discuss how Cox Enterprises' legal department is navigating technological disruptions and regulatory changes. Hightower reveals how encouraging her team to embrace AI as a core part of its strategy has helped improve efficiency, reduced reliance on outside counsel and freed attorneys to focus on higher-value legal work. In addition to pinpointing her preferred AI tools, Hightower details how company-wide training and budget expectations factored into the technology adoption. Anteau and Hightower also discuss how the executive VP leads her legal team through political polarization to maintain a workplace respectful of diverse viewpoints.   Hosts: Cedra Mayfield & Patrick Smith Reporter: Alex Anteau Guest: Jennifer Hightower Producer: Charles Garnar  

If money has no charge of its own, how could it ever be out of your control? That question sits underneath everything in this episode. I talk about why you are already in money neutrality with some number, probably a small one, and why that same ease is available at a much larger number once you stop putting your resistance on it. I also get into what I mean when I say the frequency is the work and the money is just the result, and why I have never been able to hand anyone a top ten stock list and call that value. This one is a little more personal than usual. I share how the Spiritual Investor actually came to be, what I have been disentangling from lately, and what happens when you stop trying to control your circumstances and start being the space instead. In this episode: What money neutrality actually is, and why it is a state of being rather than something you arrive at Why you are already neutral with $100 and what that tells you about $100,000 Certainty as source, and the practice of certainty hunting Why breaking the structure shows you that you were never unsafe Disentangling from story without giving up what you want Why your state of allowing is deciding what comes in We are currently enrolling for our next round of The Spiritual Investor Mastermind. We get started on September 1st. Apply at thespiritualinvestor.com/simastermind today to save your spot.

Dr. Wendy Ashley explores how clinicians can move beyond the myth of neutrality by recognizing how identity, power, privilege, and lived experience shape clinical work. She offers practical guidance for practicing with greater cultural humility, reflexivity, authenticity, and responsiveness in the therapeutic relationship. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT.Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Catalogers discuss rejecting neutrality in the creation and management of subject headings, taking special notice of the Library of Congress's insistence on (some version of) "neutrality." Guests: Deborah Tomaras, Metadata and Resource Management Librarian at Marist University; Tina Gross, Metadata Analyst at University of Minnesota. First broadcast July 24 2026. Playlist "We asked Deborah to explain why this quite common term, which has been around since the 1950s, and has literary warrant, was not accepted as a subject heading in 2024."

Today, Paul M. Neuberger charges headlong into the “separation of church and state” debate—not to play by the world's rules, but to call them out. America hasn't silenced religion—it's replaced Christianity with a new god called secular humanism. Neutrality? It's a myth. Every company, every classroom, every government is preaching a gospel—just not always the Gospel of Jesus Christ.The cost? Criticism. Accusation. Exile from the “acceptable” conversation. But remember this, men—Jesus is still Lord. The Word is still truth. The light isn't meant for the sanctuary—it's meant for the world.The battle lines are drawn. What will you do when you're asked to check your faith at the door? Will you stay silent, or will you stand?"In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven." –Matthew 5:16Episode Highlights12:07 - Now that we've established why I don't believe a truly neutral public square exists, I want to talk about the worldview that has increasingly filled the space once occupied by Christianity in a lot of our cultural institutions. And again, that worldview is secular humanism.20:23 - If somebody says my position comes from biblical truth, they're frequently accused of bringing religion into the discussion. But if somebody else says my position comes from personal autonomy or human flourishing or social progress or evolving moral consensus, those ideas are often treated as though they're simply objective and universal. That is an example of inconsistency, because those are moral frameworks too.41:00 - I believe that one of the greatest dangers facing the American church today is not persecution. Instead, it's passivity. Apathy. Far too many believers have convinced themselves that if they simply stay quiet, work hard, attend church on Sunday, and avoid controversy, that everything is going to somehow work itself out. I don't believe history supports that conclusion. Not by a mile.Connect with Paul M. NeubergerWebsite

We all know Switzerland is neutral. But why? Listen in and you might learn something.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Gary is interviewed by Pastor William Ochoa from Guatemala about presuppositional apologetics. William has been translating some of Gary's books into Spanish, and he is currently working on Thinking Straight in a Crooked World. The conversation begins there and continues through why it is important for Christians to have answers to objections to the Christian faith.

Text: Mark 11:27-33Teacher: Troy Maragos Big Idea: When Christ confronts us with His authority, avoidance is an option—but it might not be the right response. 3 Ways to Stay Spiritually Neutral: The Spiritually Neutral are unwilling to submit to Christ's authority—but True Followers submit to His authority. The Spiritually Neutral reason around the evidence of Jesus—but True Followers receive His truth. The Spiritually Neutral fear man more than fearing God—but True Followers respond to Christ with resolve.

CoinDesk's The Policy Protocol hosts Rebecca Rettig and Renato Mariotti open with two hot topics: the SEC's request for public comment on "novel" ETFs and the launch of Open USD, a new stablecoin protocol backed by Coinbase, major banks, Visa, and Mastercard. Christian Catalini, Founder of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab and co-creator of Facebook's Diem/Libram project, joins to argue that the alliance's real test will be in governance. Plus, Rebecca and Renato close by naming their Person of the Week ahead of an important July 4th target. - Timecodes: 00:00 - Welcome to The Policy Protocol 01:57 - SEC Opens Public Comment on "Novel" ETFs 04:39 - Open Standard and the Antitrust Question 07:27 - Christian Catalini on Libra's Lessons, Neutrality, and Governance 16:14 - Person of the Week - This episode is brought to you by RealFi, a smarter stablecoin, backed by real-world assets. Find out more at realfi.co. - Ledn provides a secure and transparent way to access liquidity while maintaining your bitcoin holdings. Perfect 8 year track record of keeping clients assets safe. Don't sell your bitcoin. Get a bitcoin-backed loan. Check out your rate by using their loan calculator at ledn.io - JPEG Trading is a global proprietary trading firm specializing in cryptocurrency and decentralized finance markets. From market structure and liquidity provision to quantitative trading strategies, JPEG Trading operates across the full spectrum of blockchain-based assets. Follow @jpegtrading on X to stay ahead of the latest developments in digital asset markets: https://x.com/jpegtrading

What does real confidence look like when life refuses to slow down? In Episode 355 of The Business Development Podcast, Kelly Kennedy welcomes back Founder of Let Me Introduce Yourself and Confidence Coach Alyssa McMasters for a powerful conversation about confidence, emotional neutrality, resilience, entrepreneurship, sales, leadership, and the realities of balancing a high-performing career with parenthood. Alyssa shares her own journey through burnout, imposter syndrome, motherhood, and rebuilding her career, revealing how learning to embrace emotional neutrality transformed not only the way she leads, but the way she makes decisions, sets boundaries, and shows up in every aspect of her life.Together, Kelly and Alyssa explore why so many high performers tie their self-worth to outcomes, how to navigate guilt, embarrassment, rejection, and uncertainty without allowing them to dictate your decisions, and practical strategies for regulating your nervous system, building resilience, and creating confidence that isn't dependent on the next win. Whether you're an entrepreneur, sales professional, leader, parent, or simply someone striving to become more grounded in an increasingly demanding world, this episode offers an honest and actionable roadmap for leading yourself with greater clarity, confidence, and purpose.Key Takeaways: Confidence is built by learning to keep moving when life feels uncertain.Emotional neutrality allows you to feel guilt, fear, or embarrassment without letting those emotions control your decisions.High performers often struggle because they tie their self-worth to wins, losses, clients, and outcomes.Boundaries are not selfish, they are how you protect your capacity and show up honestly.Saying no still might feel uncomfortable, but discomfort does not mean the decision is wrong.You cannot do everything well at once, so honesty about capacity is essential.Detaching from the outcome is critical in sales, entrepreneurship, parenting, and leadership.Real resilience is the ability to return to neutral faster after setbacks.Nervous system regulation helps you make better decisions instead of reacting from emotional highs or lows.Confidence is not about pretending everything is fine, it is about building the skills to keep showing up.Connect with Alyssa McMastersTo learn more about Alyssa McMasters, Founder of Let Me Introduce Yourself, or to connect with her for confidence coaching, speaking, workshops, and leadership development, visit the links below.

Tired of the constant mental chatter? Feeling drained by unresolved issues and endless to-do lists? You're a high-performer, always striving for excellence. But that drive often comes with a hidden cost: a mind full of "open loops" – those nagging thoughts, unfinished tasks, and unresolved conflicts that silently steal your energy. In this powerful discussion, we dive deep into the concept of neutrality – not as indifference, but as a strategic superpower for the exhausted high-achiever. Discover how embracing neutrality can help you: Stop the energy drain: Learn to identify and close those "open loops" that keep you mentally busy and emotionally depleted. Navigate conflict with calm: Instead of reacting and escalating, find your "defining moment" to manage situations with steady, anchored presence, even when things matter deeply. Reclaim your peace and sanity: Understand how to pause, gain clarity, and avoid the knee-jerk reactions that lead to bigger problems and deeper exhaustion. Transform relationships: Discover how a neutral stance can foster understanding, prevent damage, and create space for genuine repair, even in your most challenging interactions. Unlock more solutions: See how stepping back from immediate judgment and reaction opens up a world of possibilities and empowers you to find more effective outcomes. We'll explore practical strategies like: Noticing the "surge": Identifying what triggers your emotional reactions. Questioning your "story": Challenging your ingrained beliefs about situations and people. Asking for clarity: Slowing down conversations to truly understand, rather than assume. "Eating your popcorn": Observing situations without getting emotionally entangled. If you're ready to move beyond constant reaction and cultivate a powerful inner calm that fuels your performance without burning you out, this video is for you. Learn how to be present, hear clearly, and manage yourself so you don't "give up your sanity or your peace." Don't let open loops dictate your energy. Tap into the power of neutrality and reclaim your focus, peace, and effectiveness. If this resonated, there's probably an open loop of your own worth closing. My free Close the Loop tool walks you through it in about 15 minutes — a gentle place to start.

What if the reality you're reacting to today is actually an echo of who you used to be? In this mind-expanding episode of the Quantum Business Queen Podcast, Sarah Tynan sits down with Allari to explore one of the most misunderstood concepts in quantum creation, manifestation, and business growth: Time. More specifically, why most entrepreneurs unknowingly trap themselves in a "temporal mirage loop"—a cycle where they're using old evidence, old results, and old identity structures to predict what's possible next. If you've ever felt like you're doing all the right things but your external reality hasn't caught up yet, this episode will completely shift how you view success, manifestation, business growth, timelines, and identity. You'll discover why your current results may simply be echoes of previous frequencies—and how to stop recreating the same future over and over again. In This Episode You'll Learn: ✨ What the "Temporal Mirage Loop" is and how it keeps entrepreneurs stuck ✨ Why your current reality is often an echo of past decisions and frequencies ✨ How reacting to old evidence reinforces old timelines ✨ The energetic mechanics behind quantum leaps and nonlinear growth ✨ Why neutrality may be more powerful than positive thinking ✨ How acceptance accelerates manifestation ✨ The importance of closing energetic loops and unfinished business ✨ Why somatic coherence matters more than mindset alone ✨ How to navigate the "void" between old identities and new realities ✨ Practical ways to collapse time and create faster results Key Takeaways ✔ Today's evidence is not proof of tomorrow's possibilities. ✔ Your current reality is often delayed feedback from past choices. ✔ Quantum leaps happen when identity shifts faster than physical evidence. ✔ Neutrality reduces energetic interference and increases creative power. ✔ The void is not a setback—it's a transition space. ✔ Closing energetic loops creates more capacity for expansion. ✔ The future is created through frequency, identity, and embodiment—not force. Timestamps 00:00 Introduction 01:15 Understanding the Temporal Mirage Loop 03:48 Why your current results may be old data 06:12 How entrepreneurs accidentally recreate the same future 08:30 The power of neutrality and energetic coherence 11:04 Acceptance versus resistance 13:27 Closing energetic loops and reclaiming bandwidth 16:15 Somatic coherence and embodied expansion 19:02 The role of future memories and nonlinear creation 22:40 Understanding the void between identities 26:11 Why most people rush back into old patterns 29:33 Microjoy, momentum, and quantum breadcrumbs 32:08 Daily rituals that support identity expansion 35:17 Final reflections and practical application Who This Episode Is For This episode is for: ✔ Coaches ✔ Healers ✔ Consultants ✔ Service-based entrepreneurs ✔ Conscious creators ✔ Business owners seeking quantum growth ✔ Anyone who feels stuck despite doing "all the right things" ✔ People navigating identity shifts, expansion, or reinvention About Sarah Tynan Sarah Tynan is a business mentor, quantum coach, and founder of the Quantum Business Academy. She helps coaches, healers, and service-based entrepreneurs create scalable businesses through energetic mastery, automations, demand-generation ecosystems, identity work, and multidimensional business principles. Ready To Create Nonlinear Business Growth? If you're ready to stop reacting to old evidence, collapse outdated timelines, and build a business from a completely different energetic foundation, book an Alignment Call today.

Keith Whittington is joined by Brian Soucek, the Martin Luther King J. Professor of Law at the University of California at Davis School of Law and a member of the American Association of University Professors' Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure. They discuss his recent book, The Opinionated University: Academic Freedom, Diversity, and the Myth of Neutrality in American Higher Education. They discuss diversity initiatives at American universities, institutional speech by academic departments and universities, and their relation to academic freedom and the mission of the university.

The French revolution breaks out, then France declares war on England. America is unprepared for war.  

IN A WORLD OF CYBERATTACKS, UNDERSEA CABLES, DRONES AND INCREASING GEOPOLITICAL TENSION, SOME ARE ASKING WHETHER IRELAND'S THINKING ABOUT NEUTRALITY AND DEFENCE HAS KEPT PACE WITH THE CHALLENGES WE FACE. PAUL DAVIS, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF MANAGEMENT AT DCU, LENDS HIS EXPERTISE.

Please join us at patreon.com/tortoiseshack “The People's Forum on Peace and Neutrality has been organised in a context where the EU policy of rearmament, with an increased reliance on weapons production, calls in to question its origins as a peace project and its commitment to UN authority, diplomacy and peaceful conflict resolution.” Joining me this evening from the Neutrality Roadshow is Rory Rowan and (legend) Niamh Ní Bhrian to discuss the even this weekend that'll feature the likes of Francesca Albanese and (tortoise shack exclusive reveal) Michael D. Higgins. Beyond the forum, this is a great conversation about a battle for neutrality that we need to take to this uncaring government. The Jim O'Callaghan Humpty Dumpty podcast:https://www.patreon.com/tortoiseshack/posts/patron-exclusive-160993442 Tickets:https://www.eventbrite.ie/e/peoples-forum-on-peace-and-neutrality-june-19th-and-20th-tickets-1991047790539?aff=oddtdtcreator&_gl=1*bv64pw*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTgwOTIyODY4NC4xNzgwNTcxNjg4*_ga_TQVES5V6SH*czE3ODA1NzE2ODYkbzEkZzEkdDE3ODA1NzE3OTEkajYwJGwwJGgw

ustice is rarely simple. At the conclusion of this See You In Court conversation, Professor Stephen Vladeck describes justice as messy, imprecise, and complicated. Those complications, however, help give people confidence that the law is more stable, neutral, and principled than the will of whoever currently holds political power. This closing reflection connects directly to Robin Frazer Clark and Lester Tate's broader interview with Professor Vladeck about the Supreme Court's shadow docket, due process, judicial transparency, and public confidence in the legal system. Watch the complete interview on YouTube: https://youtu.be/kfK3Fl1_Qgw?si=L-yLs9z0LJkrmHEP Listen to the complete episode on Podbean: https://seeyouincourt.podbean.com/e/the-supreme-court-s-secret-power-grab-shadow-docket-explained/ Learn more: https://seeyouincourtpodcast.org/   Justice, Stephen Vladeck, Supreme Court, Shadow Docket, Rule of Law, Due Process, Judicial Transparency, Civil Justice, Legal Podcast, See You In Court  

Back from an unforgettable 9 day trip to Iran while the War continued.... a powerful testament to the resilience & dignity of the Iranian people..latest episode of i4ctroublewithdalyandwallace... The People's Forum on Peace and Neutrality - https://shorturl.at/9bKih www.youtube.com/@I4CTroublewithDalyandWallace

H.W. Brands describes how, by the summer of 1939, the destruction of Poland by German and Soviet forces confirmed that war was imminent, prompting Roosevelt to invoke neutrality laws as required by Congress. Despite his desire for privacy, Lindbergh began using his celebrity status to secure national radio airtime, feeling a duty to prevent Americafrom repeating what he viewed as the "mistake" of the First World War. His father, a former congressman, had been driven out of politics for opposing American intervention in 1917, a legacy that instilled in Lindbergh a profound distrust of politics as a "mean business" where truth was rare. Lindbergh argued that Britain and France were launching a war they could not win and would eventually force the United States into a permanent presence in Europe. During this period, he consulted with figures like Herbert Hoover, who suggested forming a committee that would eventually become "America First," and visited the "House of Morgan" through his wife's family connections. British observers, such as Harold Nicolson, were less impressed, dismissing Lindbergh as a "schoolboy" who possessed technical talent but lacked a mature understanding of diplomacy and the complexities of governing a great empire. Lindbergh remained unfazed by British criticism, asserting that he was an American and that his country's interests were distinct from those of the British Empire. (2)1936

H.W. Brands explains how, following the massacre in Poland, Roosevelt sought to modify the Neutrality Acts—laws passed in the mid-1930s specifically to prevent the types of economic and travel entanglements that had drawn the U.S.into World War I. Roosevelt argued that providing weapons to Britain and France would allow them to defend themselves, thereby keeping American troops out of the conflict. Lindbergh and anti-interventionist Senators like Burton Wheeler and Robert Borah remained deeply skeptical, believing Roosevelt was being "transactional" and dishonest about his true intent to lead the U.S. into a new European order. Roosevelt countered by attacking his critics early, using the word "isolation" like a "plague" and characterizing their views as well-meaning but ignorant. While some suggested Lindbergh as a potential 1940 Republican presidential candidate, he refused to enter politics, preferring to challenge the president through the airwaves. Roosevelt carefully shaped public opinion, fearing the type of backlash Woodrow Wilson faced for getting too far ahead of the populace. When France fell in just six weeks to the German Blitzkrieg in 1940, Lindbergh felt vindicated, arguing that American troops would have merely been trapped on the beaches. Meanwhile, Winston Churchill manipulated Roosevelt with warnings that a falling British government might surrender its fleet to Germany, successfully pressuring the president to send American destroyers to Britain. (3)1927

Neutrality is a myth—you're serving something every day. In this episode of The Relentlessly Biblical™ Podcast, we open Joshua 24 v.15 and hear Joshua's clear, urgent call: choose today whom you will serve. We'll expose the modern “gods” competing for your loyalty—comfort, control, approval, and security—and bring you back to simple covenant clarity: as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD. Walk away with a fresh sense of conviction, courage, and a practical path to align your life and home with faithful obedience.Welcome to The Relentlessly Biblical™ Podcast. Every first Sunday of the month, we bring you a show dedicated to establishing and reinforcing a high view of the scriptures and Jesus Christ, of whom the scriptures speak. So tell all your podcasting friends and family that this show is free to Listen and Follow on the podcast platform of their choice.If you encounter issues accessing our episode notes on your preferred podcast platform, please visit The Relentlessly Biblical™ Podcast website to access the complete set of notes.Scriptures links and references:Joshua 24 v. 15Consider Partnering with Us:When you support this show through your prayers and gifts, you enable us to provide sound biblical teaching that helps others open up their understanding of the scriptures across the globe. Please Donate Now to make a one-time gift, or use PayPal to make it a recurring monthly donation. Thank you for your gracious, thoughtful support. Please visit our Core-Truth Media Network page and explore the diverse range of podcasts and high-quality content we provide to those seeking to deepen their understanding of the Bible and grow in their faith. Core-Truth Media is a registered subsidiary of Core-Truth Ministries and is organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes as a 501(c)(3) Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation. © Copyright 2026 Core-Truth Media All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use and or duplication of this media without permission is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be shared, provided that full and clear credit be given to The Relentlessly Biblical™ Podcast with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

“Today is the day” stands up as the claim, and God is shown as the God of today. A sunken treasure and a dockside sign preach it: for sixteen years, Mel Fisher sent crews out under one line, “Today is the day,” until the mother lode was found. That picture trains the heart to live in God's now. Psalm 118 is heard this way: “Today is the day that the Lord has made,” so the right response is rejoicing, not postponing. Delay is unmasked as the enemy's favorite weapon. “Tomorrow” sounds pious and feels safe, but Hebrews warns that “today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts.” “Later” calcifies the conscience. Delayed obedience is still disobedience. “Now faith” meets God in the present moment. The greatest miracle does not land yesterday and will not wait for a someday. Paul says it plain: “Now is the day of salvation.” So the call is not “once you clean up,” but “right in the middle of your mess, now.” The disciples model the pace of grace: Jesus calls, and they “immediately” drop the nets. Joshua narrows it further. “Choose you today whom you will serve.” Neutrality is gone. The daily decision is not to make everything perfect, but to decide who rules the heart, and to decide it today.

What if the person you have been struggling with is actually neutral  and you have been the one writing the story? In this opening episode of a four-part June series, we introduce what may be the most freeing concept in any relational life: the neutrality of others. Other people are not the source of your suffering. Their behavior is neutral. It is your thoughts about that behavior, running on a loop inside your own mind, that create the relationship you are having with them. Once you understand this all the way down, the entire location of your work changes. You stop trying to fix the relationship from the outside. You stop waiting on the other person to change. You stop hosting your emotional life on someone else's behavior. You come home. This episode covers three concepts that, when fully understood, change every relationship you have:People are neutral. Your thoughts about them create the relationship.Lovability is a birthright. The variable is capacity.Take care of your own needs first. Everything else is a bonus.Leah brings personal stories, the coaching lens she has used with thousands of clients, and a practice you can begin this week ... pick one person, do the work, and watch what happens to you. The other person never has to change a thing. This is week one of four. The relationship you most want to repair, deepen, or release is on the other side of this work. You are 100% lovable. So are they. Worth is a birthright. The work is the love.

This is a special show outside of our normal Veterans for Peace Radio Hour as I continue to do what I can to share voices of peace, humanity, and justice. I wanted to share some of the words and insights from a recent conference hosted by Schiller called The Urgent Need for a New International Security and Development Architecture. I am sharing the words of three of the six speakers on this panel including Professor Zhang Wei (China), Director of the China Institute at Fudan University: “Building a Profitable Multipolar World Order. Then Chas Freeman (USA), former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia: “The Birth, Death, and Prospective Rebirth of the World Order” and finally Dr. Wolfgang Bittner (Germany, author: “Sovereignty, Neutrality, Culture”

Michael explores how America's political polarization is spilling into the jury room. Expert jury consultant Dr. Laurie Kuslansky joins the program to discuss rising mistrials, partisan bias among jurors, the impact of Trump-era politics on the justice system, and whether fair and impartial juries are becoming harder to find. Plus, listeners share their own surprising jury duty experiences. Original air date 28 May 2026. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – A politicized judiciary raises urgent questions about constitutional limits, court packing, government weaponization, and parental rights. From Supreme Court reform battles to a Kentucky mother's fight for school transparency, Americans face a growing concern: when politics corrupts legal institutions, where can ordinary people turn for justice and fair resolution today?

The conversation explores the intersection of Christianity and politics, emphasizing the moral and theological implications of political engagement. It delves into the role of Christians in shaping culture, the impact of secularism, the relationship between Christianity and national identity, and the church's mission in the midst of political and cultural challenges.TakeawaysChristianity and politics are inherently intertwined, as politics deals with questions of morality, justice, law, truth, authority, family, life, sexuality, education, freedom, and human nature.The church's mission is to make disciples and proclaim the gospel, engaging in politics faithfully while remembering that ultimate hope is found in Christ, not in political power.Chapters00:00 The Intersection of Christianity and Politics13:08 The Myth of Neutrality and the Influence of Worldview on Culture19:46 Jesus' Engagement with Power and Authority40:13 Christian Nationalism and the Role of the Church48:53 Engaging Politics Faithfully and the Church's Mission

Send us Fan MailIn this episode of Think Like a Dog, Andreia and Millie break down why so many dog-to-dog introductions go wrong and why humans often put too much pressure on dogs to “make friends.” They discuss why on-leash greetings can create tension, frustration, reactivity, and miscommunication, especially when dogs are pulling toward each other or being forced into an interaction.This conversation also explains why “dog friendly” is not always a clear or helpful label. Dogs have different personalities, limits, social skills, and preferences, and a successful greeting with one dog does not mean a dog will do well with every dog.Andreia and Millie talk through what healthy introductions should look like, why neutrality should come before socialization, what body language owners should watch for, and how shelter volunteers, fosters, adopters, and everyday dog owners can set dogs up for more successful interactions.This episode is especially helpful for dog owners dealing with leash reactivity, rescue dog introductions, dog park issues, multi-dog households, foster dogs, and anyone trying to better understand dog behavior and socialization.Support the showFollow Us On Instagram: @thinklikeadogpodcast @Mirrorimagek9@OzzieAlbiesFoundationWork with Mirror Image K9 here:  https://www.mirrorimagek9.com/contactusBe Our Guest:https://www.thinklikeadogpodcast.comLearn More About The Best Chance Program:https://www.ozziealbiesfoundation.org/

Following the invasion of Poland, Lindbergh uses his celebrity status to broadcast radio speeches advocating for strict neutrality. Influenced by his father's persecution during World War I, he views politics as a deceptive business and fears permanent American involvement in Europe. Lindbergh argues that Britain and France have started a war they cannot win without U.S. intervention. He prioritizes American interests over the survival of the British Empire, which he believes is in decline. Meanwhile, British critics dismiss him as a "schoolboy" who lacks the maturity to understand complex global diplomacy. (2/8)1936

FDR seeks to modify the Neutrality Acts to provide aid to the Allies, sparking a fierce debate with Lindbergh and non-interventionist senators. These critics deeply distrust Roosevelt, believing he is incrementally leading the nation toward war through deceptive policy shifts. FDR counters by labeling his opponents "ignorant" and "isolationist," while carefully shaping public opinion to avoid the political backlash faced by Woodrow Wilson. The rapid fall of France in 1940 reinforces Lindbergh's warnings, yet it also prompts FDR to initiate the destroyers-for-bases deal with Winston Churchill. This transaction effectively signals the end of true American neutrality. (3/8)1936

What relationship should exist between the church and the civil magistrate?Should the state remain “neutral” toward religion — or does Scripture teach that rulers have real duties concerning the true faith?In this episode of The Magistrate, Josh Howard and James Baird explore the historic Protestant understanding of church and state, including the forgotten distinction between in sacra and circa sacra — categories that shaped Christian political theology for centuries.- Can governments acknowledge Christ without controlling the church? - What authority belongs uniquely to the church? - And why have modern Christians largely abandoned the historic Reformed view of the civil magistrate? This episode examines:- Church vs. state authority - Christian nationalism and religious neutrality - The role of civil rulers in Scripture- Erastianism vs. radical separationism - Protestant political theology - The legacy of the Reformation - Whether governments have duties toward Christianity If you've ever wondered whether a “neutral” state is actually possible, this discussion is essential.Watch all of our videos and subscribe to our channel for the latest content >HereHere

It is imperative that everyone who follows Jesus Christ understands that we are in a war. It's a war that is spiritual, but it may have physical consequences. If you're not aware that you are in that kind of war, you very likely have already been taken captive. If you are a pacifist in this war, you have been at least effectively neutralized. Neutrality is capitulation. There is no fence-sitting as the battle rages. Jesus said that he who is not with Him is against Him (Matthew 12:30).So, if we are indeed in a war, what's it all about? It's a war for the hearts of humanity—and the adversaries are God and Satan."Tom, are you serious? Are you telling me that God couldn't defeat Satan in a heartbeat—that one of His created beings is a match for Him?" No. I know that God could wipe out Satan in an instant and, for that matter, all the rest of God's created, rebellious beings collectively, should He so desire. He did it once before, save eight.The war on God's part is not about defeating His adversary. It is a battle over the prize. It's about winning the hearts of mankind. "My son, give me thine heart" (Proverbs 23:26).

*Content Warning: institutional betrayal, institutional trauma, sexual assault, sexual abuse, sexual harassment, campus violence, gender-based violence, psychological trauma, victim-blaming, discrimination, gender inequality, harassment, and hostile campus environments. Free + Confidential Resources + Safety Tips: somethingwaswrong.com/resources   Follow Dr. Nicole Bedera: Website: https://www.nicolebedera.com/  Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/nbedera.bsky.social  Book: On The Wrong Side - How Universities Protect Perpetrators and Betray Survivors of Sexual Violence: https://www.nicolebedera.com/about-1  Beyond Compliance Consulting: https://www.beyond-compliance-consulting.com/ Survivor Alumni Network: https://survivoralumninetwork.org/ Follow Dr. Jacqueline Cruz: Dr. Jacqueline Cruz on Google Scholars: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=oHhHaTEAAAAJ&hl=en Beyond Compliance Consulting: https://www.beyond-compliance-consulting.com/ Survivor Alumni Network: https://survivoralumninetwork.org/ Follow Dr. Kathryn Holland: Website: https://psychology.unl.edu/person/kathryn-holland/ Dr. Kathryn Holland on Google Scholars: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=OgJhWwoAAAAJ&hl=en SWW S25 Theme Song & Artwork:  The S25 cover art is by the Amazing Sara Stewart instagram.com/okaynotgreat/ The S25 theme song is a cover of Glad Rag's U Think U from their album Wonder Under, performed by the incredible Abayomi instagram.com/Abayomithesinger. The S25 theme song cover was produced by Janice “JP” Pacheco instagram.com/jtooswavy/  *Sources: -Bedera, Nicole et al. “"I Could Never Tell My Parents": Barriers to Queer Women's College Sexual Assault Disclosure to Family Members.” Violence against women vol. 29,5 (2023): 800-816. doi:10.1177/10778012221101920 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35938472/-Bedera, Nicole. (2021). Moaning and Eye Contact: Men's Use of Ambiguous Signals in Attributions of Consent to Their Partners. Violence Against Women. 27. 3093-3113. 10.1177/1077801221992870 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349905933_Moaning_and_Eye_Contact_Men's_Use_of_Ambiguous_Signals_in_Attributions_of_Consent_to_Their_Partners-Bedera, Nicole Krystine. On the Wrong Side: How Universities Protect Perpetrators and Betray Survivors of Sexual Violence. University of California Press, 2024. https://www.nicolebedera.com/about-1-Bedera, Nicole. (2022). The Illusion of Choice: Organizational Dependency and the Neutralization of University Sexual Assault Complaints. Law & Policy. 44. 10.1111/lapo.12194. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362058763_The_Illusion_of_Choice_Organizational_Dependency_and_the_Neutralization_of_University_Sexual_Assault_Complaints-Cipriano, A. E., Holland, K. J., Bedera, N., Eagan, S. R., & Diede, A. S. (2022). Severe and pervasive? Consequences of sexual harassment for graduate students and their Title IX report outcomes. Feminist Criminology, 17(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211062579-Cruz, Jacqueline. (2021). The Constraints of Fear and Neutrality in Title IX Administrators' Responses to Sexual Violence. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1809268-Cruz, Jacqueline. “Gender Inequality in Higher Education: University Title IX Administrators' Responses to Sexual Violence.” Google, New York University, 2020, scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=oHhHaTEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=oHhHaTEAAAAJ%3Ad1gkVwhDpl0C-Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sex-based harassment becomes sexual harassment: College students' experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032040-Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment: Undermining the well-being of working women. Journal of Social Issues, 72(4), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12190-Holland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Sex-based harassment and discrimination: Evidence of psychological harm. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314521575- Holland, K. J. (2019). Culture, power, and gender-based violence in institutions. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), APA Handbook of the Psychology of Women (Vol. 2, pp. 253–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-014- Holland, Kathryn J, and Rebecca L Howard Valdivia. “Title IX and Sexual Violence in Higher Education: A Mapping Review and Assessment of Policy Implementation and Effectiveness.” Journal of sex research, 1-19. 18 Feb. 2026, doi:10.1080/00224499.2026.2623649. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41705546/

*Content Warning: institutional betrayal, institutional trauma, sexual assault, sexual abuse, sexual harassment, campus violence, gender-based violence, psychological trauma, victim-blaming, discrimination, gender inequality, harassment, and hostile campus environments.Free + Confidential Resources + Safety Tips: somethingwaswrong.com/resources   Follow Dr. Nicole Bedera: Website: https://www.nicolebedera.com/  Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/nbedera.bsky.social  Book: On The Wrong Side - How Universities Protect Perpetrators and Betray Survivors of Sexual Violence: https://www.nicolebedera.com/about-1  Follow Dr. Jacqueline Cruz: Beyond Compliance Consulting: https://www.beyond-compliance-consulting.com/ Dr. Jacqueline Cruz on Google Scholars: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=oHhHaTEAAAAJ&hl=en Follow Dr. Kathryn Holland: Website: https://psychology.unl.edu/person/kathryn-holland/ Dr. Kathryn Holland on Google Scholars: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=OgJhWwoAAAAJ&hl=en SWW Sticker Shop!: https://brokencyclemedia.com/sticker-shop SWW S25 Theme Song & Artwork: The S25 cover art is by the Amazing Sara Stewart instagram.com/okaynotgreat/ The S25 theme song is a cover of Glad Rag's U Think U from their album Wonder Under, performed by the incredible Abayomi instagram.com/Abayomithesinger. The S25 theme song cover was produced by Janice “JP” Pacheco instagram.com/jtooswavy/ at The Grill Studios in Emeryville, CA instagram.com/thegrillstudios/ Follow Something Was Wrong: Website: somethingwaswrong.com  IG: instagram.com/somethingwaswrongpodcast TikTok: tiktok.com/@somethingwaswrongpodcast  Follow Tiffany Reese: Website: tiffanyreese.me  IG: instagram.com/lookieboo *Sources: -Bedera, Nicole et al. “"I Could Never Tell My Parents": Barriers to Queer Women's College Sexual Assault Disclosure to Family Members.” Violence against women vol. 29,5 (2023): 800-816. doi:10.1177/10778012221101920 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35938472/-Bedera, Nicole Krystine. On the Wrong Side: How Universities Protect Perpetrators and Betray Survivors of Sexual Violence. University of California Press, 2024. https://www.nicolebedera.com/about-1-Cipriano, A. E., Holland, K. J., Bedera, N., Eagan, S. R., & Diede, A. S. (2022). Severe and pervasive? Consequences of sexual harassment for graduate students and their Title IX report outcomes. Feminist Criminology, 17(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211062579-Cruz, Jacqueline. (2021). The Constraints of Fear and Neutrality in Title IX Administrators' Responses to Sexual Violence. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1809268-Cruz, Jacqueline. “Gender Inequality in Higher Education: University Title IX Administrators' Responses to Sexual Violence.” Google, New York University, 2020, scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=oHhHaTEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=oHhHaTEAAAAJ%3Ad1gkVwhDpl0C-Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sex-based harassment becomes sexual harassment: College students' experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032040-Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment: Undermining the well-being of working women. Journal of Social Issues, 72(4), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12190-Holland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Sex-based harassment and discrimination: Evidence of psychological harm. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314521575- Holland, K. J. (2019). Culture, power, and gender-based violence in institutions. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), APA Handbook of the Psychology of Women (Vol. 2, pp. 253–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-014-Johnson CA (2023) The purpose of whisper networks: a new lens for studying informal communication channels in organizations. Front. Commun. 8:1089335. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1089335 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1089335/full-“Shitty Media Men.” Shitty Media Men, 29 Oct. 2017, shittymediamenlist.wordpress.com/

This week on The World View, we look at three stories that all point to the same reality: neutrality is an illusion. First, conflict in the Middle East raises deeper questions about religion, power, and the myth of “neutral” nations. Then, a shocking indictment involving a major watchdog organization exposes how much of our public discourse may be shaped from above. Finally, a heated debate among Christians over “soft men” reveals something deeper about the state of the Church—and the future of missions. Scripture doesn’t give us a category for lasting neutrality. Every nation, every system, and every life ultimately answers the same question: who is Lord? This isn’t a call to cynicism. It’s a call to clarity—and to faithful action. Find out how you can serve the Lord among the nations or at home: https://abwe.org/discover⁠�

*Content Warning: sexual violence, institutional betrayal, rape, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, gender-based violence, sexual assault, and abuse. Free + Confidential Resources + Safety Tips: somethingwaswrong.com/resources   Support Dr. Jacqueline Cruz:Beyond Compliance Consulting: https://www.beyond-compliance-consulting.com/ SWW Sticker Shop!: https://brokencyclemedia.com/sticker-shop SWW S25 Theme Song & Artwork: The S25 cover art is by the Amazing Sara Stewart instagram.com/okaynotgreat/ The S25 theme song is a cover of Glad Rag's U Think U from their album Wonder Under, performed by the incredible Abayomi instagram.com/Abayomithesinger. The S25 theme song cover was produced by Janice “JP” Pacheco instagram.com/jtooswavy/ at The Grill Studios in Emeryville, CA instagram.com/thegrillstudios/ Follow Something Was Wrong: Website: somethingwaswrong.com  IG: instagram.com/somethingwaswrongpodcast TikTok: tiktok.com/@somethingwaswrongpodcast  Follow Tiffany Reese: Website: tiffanyreese.me  IG: instagram.com/lookieboo *Sources: -Cruz, Jacqueline. (2021). The Constraints of Fear and Neutrality in Title IX Administrators' Responses to Sexual Violence. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1809268-Cruz, Jacqueline. “Gender Inequality in Higher Education: University Title IX Administrators' Responses to Sexual Violence.” Google, New York University, 2020, scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=oHhHaTEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=oHhHaTEAAAAJ%3Ad1gkVwhDpl0C

H.W. Brands explains how FDR seeks to modify the Neutrality Acts as war intensifies, while Lindbergh and several senators distrust the president's incremental march toward war. FDR counters by labeling critics "isolationists" and "ignorant," while carefully shaping public opinion. The rapid fall of France in 1940 vindicates Lindbergh's stance for some, though it leads FDR to initiate the destroyers-for-bases deal with a pleading Winston Churchill. (3)