Podcasts about research quarterly

Can you Build Muscle without Heavy Lifting? Join Dr. Gabrielle Lyon as she sits down with Dr. Jeremey Loenneke, an associate professor of exercise science at the University of Mississippi and one of the world's leading experts in blood flow restriction (BFR) training. They discuss the science behind skeletal muscle adaptation, how BFR can help you get stronger without heavy weights, and why muscle growth and strength aren't always the same thing.Dr. Loenneke shares insights on how BFR works—using low loads to trigger muscle adaptation and growth—and the potential benefits for recovery, rehabilitation, and even everyday training for those wanting to avoid joint strain. They also explore some fascinating phenomena like cross-education, where training one side of your body can strengthen the other side.Key Highlights:The basics and benefits of blood flow restriction trainingHow to build muscle with low weight loadsThe difference between muscle growth and muscle strengthPractical applications of BFR in both sports and rehabilitationDon't miss out on these expert insights that can transform your approach to exercise and recovery. Let's take your fitness knowledge to the next level!Who is Dr. Jeremey Loenneke?Dr. Jeremy Loenneke is an Associate Professor of Exercise Science at The University of Mississippi within the School of Applied Sciences. He received his MS in Nutrition and Exercise Science from Southeast Missouri State University and his PhD in Exercise Physiology from the University of Oklahoma. He is the director of the Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory and his research group's primary focus is on skeletal muscle adaptations to exercise with and without the application of blood flow restriction. His recent work has also focused on addressing whether or not muscle growth contributes to changes in strength with exercise. Dr. Loenneke is a Fellow of the American College of Sports Medicine and a member of the American Physiological Society. He has authored numerous peer-reviewed articles and is an Associate Editor for PLOS One, Peer J, and Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. He also serves on the editorial board for Sports Medicine and Medicine and Science in Sports and ExerciseJoin my all new 6 Week Forever Strong Bootcamp - https://bit.ly/3ZwQda7 Apply to become a patient - https://drgabriellelyon.com/new-patient-inquiry/ Join my weekly newsletter - https://institute-for-muscle-centric-medicine.ck.page/2ed23e2860 Get my book - https://drgabriellelyon.com/forever-strong/This episode is brought to you by :Zocdoc - Book your First Appointment! - https://zocdoc.com/DRLYONMUD/WTR - Code DRLYON for $20 OFF - https://mudwtr.com/drlyonPaleovalley - Code DRLYON for 15% OFF First Order! - http://paleovalley.com/DRLYONNeeded - Code DRLYON for 20% OFF - https://thisisneeded.com/DRLYONFatty15 - Code DRLYON for 15% OFF - https://fatty15.com/DRLYONFind me at:Instagram: @drgabriellelyonTik Tok: @drgabriellelyonFacebook: facebook.com/doctorgabriellelyonYouTube:...

This episode is a re-run of a previous podcast. This summer I am teaching a research reading seminar class at George Mason. It's an online master's class for practicing health and physical educators as a part of our 100% online masters program. This summer, I am launching episodes that I assign in that class.  So part of the class is reading articles, and then part of the class we listen to the expert talk about their research on this podcast. These are all episodes that have launched previously, so maybe you've heard them…but, I know there's a lot of content on this podcast and these are all great podcasts! I hope you enjoy them! And I will be back in mid August with an awesome podcast about the state of PETE in the USA with Dr. Phil Ward! Today I will discuss through a lightning review of the article ‘Stereotypical Views of Beauty and Boys STILL Not Letting Girls Play: A Student-Centered Curriculum for Young Girls Through an After-School Activist Approach' that I wrote with Brianna Meza from the California State University and Sara B. Flory from the University of South Florida. We will discuss the barriers girls from the after-school GIRL program experienced to enter the context of physical activity in schools through an activist approach. Link to blog entry: https://www.thehpewebsite.com/blog/stereotypical-views-of-beauty-and-boys-still-not-letting-girls-play Full Cite: Marttinen, M., Meza, B., & Flory, S. B.(2020). Stereotypical views of beauty and boys STILL not letting girls play: A student-centered curriculum for young girls through an after-school activist approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1(aop), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0008 Kim Oliver's article: Oliver, K. L., & Hamzeh, M. (2010). “The boys won't let us play” Fifth-grade mestizas challenge physical activity discourse at school. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2010.10599626 --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pwrhpe/support

This episode is a re-run of a previous podcast. This summer I am teaching a research reading seminar class at George Mason. It's an online master's class for practicing health and physical educators as a part of our 100% online masters program. This summer, I am launching episodes that I assign in that class.  So part of the class is reading articles, and then part of the class we listen to the expert talk about their research on this podcast. These are all episodes that have launched previously, so maybe you've heard them…but, I know there's a lot of content on this podcast and these are all great podcasts! I hope you enjoy them! And I will be back in mid August with an awesome podcast about the state of PETE in the USA with Dr. Phil Ward! This episode highlights the FIT (Fitness Integrated with Technology) Unit and explores students' perceptions of technology integration. We also discuss students perceptions of homework in PE and attitude toward PE. You can find the theory breakdown for the theory of planned behavior in the section ‘Educational Theory Breakdowns' of this document. This paper is published on-line first with Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. The podcast is guest hosted by Dr. Stephen Harvey. Full Cite: Marttinen, R., Daum, D., Fredrick III, R. N., Santiago, J., & Silverman, S. (2019). Students' Perceptions of Technology Integration During the FIT Unit. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 1-11. Other articles related to this project: Marttinen, R., Fredrick III, R. N., & Silverman, S. (2018). Changes in student attitude toward physical education across a unit of instruction. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(1), 62-70. Marttinen, R., Fredrick III, R. N., & Silverman, S. S. (2018). Middle School Students' Free-living Physical Activity on Physical Education Days, Non-physical Education Days, and Weekends. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 7(1), 5-12 Marttinen, R., Daum, D., Fredrick III, R. N., Santiago, J., & Silverman, S. (2019). Students' Perceptions of Technology Integration During the FIT Unit. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 1-11. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pwrhpe/support

In this episode, Kris and Paul discuss a paper that explores how our attention - and where we focus it - can impact our performance: Links between Attention, Performance Pressure, and Movement in Skilled Motor Action Authored by Rob Gray; published in Current Directions in Psychological Science in June, 2011. They'll discuss the difference between focusing attention internally or externally, and how each has been shown to affect athletic performance, especially when the pressure is on. They'll break down four ways that attention focus has been shown to impact movement, and what this information could mean for climbers.   *Additional studies/resources mentioned in this episode: Performance of gymnastics skill benefits from an external focus of attention Authored by Reza Abdollahipour, Gabriele Wulf, Rudolf Psotta, and Miriam Palomo Nieto; published in the Journal of Sports Sciences, 2015. Internal and External Focus of Attention in a Novice Form Sport Authored by Gavin P. Lawrence, Vicky M. Gottwald, James Hardy, and Michael A. Khan; published in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2011.   New episodes of Breaking Beta drop on Wednesdays. Make sure you're subscribed, leave us a review, and share! And please, tell all of your friends who are constantly telling you that “You'll send if when you do that, you just focus on pulling with your lats instead of your traps,” that you have the perfect podcast for them.   Breaking Beta is brought to you by Power Company Climbing and Crux Conditioning, and is a proud member of the Plug Tone Audio Collective. Find full episode transcripts, citations, and more at our website. Season 2 of Breaking Beta is proudly supported by Gnarly Sports Nutrition. For a limited time, Breaking Beta listeners can take 15% off their purchase using the code BETA15 at checkout! Or simply click the link above to shop and have the discount automatically applied. Follow Kris and Breaking Beta on Instagram  Follow Paul and Crux Conditioning on Instagram  If you have questions, comments, or want to suggest a paper we should cover, find us at our Community + Knowledge Hub. Our music is from legendary South Dakota band Rifflord.

In this episode, we interview Dr. Stephen Harvey who serves as Professor and Program Coordinator of Coaching, Health, and Physical Education at Ohio University.Steve is a world-renowned scholar and pedagogue and his most recent book is co-edited with Dr. Richard Light entitled Applied Positive Pedagogy in Sport Coaching: International Cases.  Alongside this recent publication, Dr. Harvey has authored several journal articles focusing on game-based approaches to teaching physical education and coaching.  You connect with Dr. Harvey directly on Twitter @drstephenharvey.Also invited to today's show are current undergraduate students who are taking a Principles and Philosophy of Coaching course at Canisius College.  Each student will ask Dr. Harvey a question from his recent journal article entitled:Harvey, S., Gano-Overway, L., Baghurst, T., Blom, L., & Eisenmann, J. (2022). 50 Million Strong: The Contribution of Sports Coaching. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1976715

Today I will discuss through a lightning review of the article ‘Stereotypical Views of Beauty and Boys STILL Not Letting Girls Play: A Student-Centered Curriculum for Young Girls Through an After-School Activist Approach' that I wrote with Brianna Meza from the California State University and Sara B. Flory from the University of South Florida. We will discuss the barriers girls from the after-school GIRL program experienced to enter the context of physical activity in schools through an activist approach. Twitter: @RistoMarttinen; @saraflory Link to blog entry: https://www.thehpewebsite.com/blog/stereotypical-views-of-beauty-and-boys-still-not-letting-girls-play Full Cite: Marttinen, M., Meza, B., & Flory, S. B.(2020). Stereotypical views of beauty and boys STILL not letting girls play: A student-centered curriculum for young girls through an after-school activist approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1(aop), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0008 Kim Oliver's article: Oliver, K. L., & Hamzeh, M. (2010). “The boys won't let us play” Fifth-grade mestizas challenge physical activity discourse at school. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(1), 38-51. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/pwrhpe/support

Risto is joined by Kevin Richards and Michael Hemphill to do another article club... this time it's an article by Mary O'Sullivan who gave the 2019 McCloy Lecture at SHAPE America. Here is a full cite of the article: Mary O'Sullivan (2021) Global Challenges and Opportunities for Physical Education Teacher Educators, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 92:3, 327-338, DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1730295 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1730295 --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/pwrhpe/support

C'est le sport le plus cool et le plus suivi à la fin du 19e siècle ! Adhérez à cette chaîne pour obtenir des avantages : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN4TCCaX-gqBNkrUqXdgGRA/join Pour soutenir financièrement la chaîne, trois choix: 1. Cliquez sur le bouton « Adhérer » sous la vidéo. 2. Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hndl 3. UTip: https://utip.io/lhistoirenousledira Avec: Laurent Turcot, professeur en histoire à l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada Abonnez-vous à ma chaine: https://www.youtube.com/c/LHistoirenousledira Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/histoirenousledira Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laurentturcot Les vidéos sont utilisées à des fins éducatives selon l'article 107 du Copyright Act de 1976 sur le Fair-Use. Pour aller plus loin: Matthew Algeo, Pedestrianism: When Watching People Walk Was America's Favorite Spectator Sport, Chicago, Chicago Review Press, 2014. John A. Lucas, « Pedestrianism and the struggle for the Sir John Astley Belt, 1878-1879 », Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, Vol. 39, 1968, p. 587-594. Dahn Shaulis, « Pedestriennes: Newsworthy but Controversial Women in Sporting Entertainment », Journal of Sport History, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Spring 1999), pp. 29-50 Jim Reisler, Walk of Ages: Edward Payson Weston's Extraordinary 1909 Trek Across America, University of Nebraska Press, 2015. Ari de Wilde, « Six‐day racing entrepreneurs and the emergence of the twentieth century arena sportscape, 1891‐1912 », Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, Vol. 4, no 4, 2012, p. 532-553. Greg Salvesen, « Six-day footraces in the post-pedestrianism era », Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2019. In The 1870s And '80s, Being A Pedestrian Was Anything But https://www.npr.org/2014/04/03/297327865/in-the-1870s-and-80s-being-a-pedestrian-was-anything-but #histoire #documentaire #sport

Kym went to undergrad at Clemson University, then received her master's and PhD at the University of South Carolina, where she studied with the esteemed Judy Rink. Kym has numerous publications, many of which have appeared in RQES, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. She also has over 50 presentations listed on her website and I know there are even more than that. Since joining South Carolina AHPERD in 1996, Kym has held many elected and appointed positions, including president, parliamentarian, and adviser for the South Carolina Association of Future Professionals. In 2017, Kym was named Executive Director of SCAHPERD. Kim joins us to talk about her career path and involvement with the profession.

@fabiodominski Fonte: Kostek MA, Pescatello LS, Seip RL, Angelopoulos TJ, Clarkson PM, Gordon PM, Moyna NM, Visich PS, Zoeller RF, Thompson PD, Hoffman EP, Price TB. Subcutaneous fat alterations resulting from an upper-body resistance training program. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jul;39(7):1177-85. Vispute SS, Smith JD, LeCheminant JD, Hurley KS. The effect of abdominal exercise on abdominal fat. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Kordi R, Dehghani S, Noormohammadpour P, Rostami M, Mansournia MA. Effect of abdominal resistance exercise on abdominal subcutaneous fat of obese women: a randomized controlled trial using ultrasound imaging assessments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(3):203-9. Katch, F. I., Clarkson, P. M., Kroll, W., McBride, T., & Wilcox, A. (1984). Effects of sit up exercise training on adipose cell size and adiposity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55(3), 242-247. Scotto di Palumbo A, Guerra E, Orlandi C, Bazzucchi I, Sacchetti M. Effect of combined resistance and endurance exercise training on regional fat loss. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Jun;57(6):794-801.

Dr. Lenny Wiersma is a Professor of Sport and Performance Psychology in the Department of Kinesiology at California State University, Fullerton, where he has taught since 2001. He is the Director of the Performance Psychology Lab at CSUF and has conducted research and/or worked with a variety of extreme sport athletes including big-wave surfers, extreme backcountry skiers and snowboarders, ultramarathon runners and cyclists, Crossfit Games athletes, and UFC fighters.    He serves on the advisory board of the Nike Sport Research Lab in Beaverton, Oregon, as well as on the advisory board of XPT Extreme Performance TrainingTM. Dr. Wiersma is currently on the staff of UCLA Men’s and Women’s Water Polo teams as a sport psychology consultant as well as USA Swimming’s National Team, specializing in Open Water.    He serves on the editorial board of The Sport Psychologist, is a former Associate Editor for Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, and was the Co-Director of the Center for the Advancement of Responsible Youth Sport at CSUF from 2001-2014. He received his masters and doctorate degrees in Sport and Exercise Psychology from Springfield College in Springfield, Massachusetts and his bachelor’s degree in Kinesiology from Whitworth University in Spokane, Washington.   In this Episode of Barbell Shrugged:   What can you learn from extreme sports athletes? How do you get in the zone for optimal performance? How do you mentally prepare for hard training or competition? Physiological responses to stress and what to do about it? How can you use both to get super jacked   Anders Varner on Instagram Doug Larson on Instagram Coach Travis Mash on Instagram ———————————————— Training Programs to Build Muscle: https://bit.ly/34zcGVw   Nutrition Programs to Lose Fat and Build Muscle: https://bit.ly/3eiW8FF   Nutrition and Training Bundles to Save 67%: https://bit.ly/2yaxQxa ———————————————— Please Support Our Sponsors   Fittogether - Fitness ONLY Social Media App   Organifi - Save 20% using code: “Shrugged” at organifi.com/shrugged   www.masszymes.com/shruggedfree  - for FREE bottle of BiOptimizers Masszymes   Garage Gym Equipment and Accessories: https://bit.ly/3b6GZFj Save 5% using the coupon code “Shrugged”

Andrew Colombo-Dougovito (@ThatHippieProf) comes on to discuss a paper recently published in RQES on adapted physical educators’ views of educational research. You can find his website here https://www.colombodougovito.com/ Full cite: McNamara, S. W., Colombo-Dougovito, A. M., Weiner, B., & Ahrens, C. (2020). Adapted Physical Educators’ Perspectives of Educational Research. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1-13. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/PwRHPE/support

David W. Eccles, is an Associate Professor at Florida State University, and his research concerns the psychology of skilled and expert performance and its development in real-world domains involving performance under stress, ranging from sport to law enforcement, and from medicine to the military. David received his PhD in Sport Psychology from Bangor University in the UK in 2001 and undertook post-doctoral training at the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition from 2002 to 2003. He was then Assistant and later Associate Professor of Psychology at Florida State University (FSU), took a sabbatical from the Sunshine State for a few years at a small university in England, and is currently a Professor of Sport Psychology back at FSU. He serves as Associate Editor for Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport and is on the Editorial Board for the Psychology of Sport and Exercise. David has been the recipient of approximately $5M of external funding to support his research, where funders have included the Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. In this podcast, Dr. Eccles and Cindra talk: The importance of deliberate practice The benefits of rest to performance Ways to “cognitively detach” so we can rest How to get high-quality rest Ways to prevent burnout HIGH PERFORMANCE MINDSET SHOWNOTES FOR THIS EPISODE: www.cindrakamphoff.com/Sara HOW TO ENTER THE PODCAST GIVEAWAY TO WIN $500 CASH: www.drcindra.com/giveaway FB COMMUNITY FOR THE HPM PODCAST: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2599776723457390/ FOLLOW CINDRA ON INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/cindrakamphoff/ FOLLOW CINDRA ON TWITTER: https://twitter.com/mentally_strong Love the show? Rate and review the show for Cindra to mention you on the next episode: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/high-performance-mindset-learn-from-world-class-leaders/id1034819901        

Does listening to music, something many of us do when we exercise, really do anything for your training performance?Because it’s such a popular motivator in sports and fitness, it would only make sense that it does something to help. Or, is it magical thinking that your favorite tunes make you stronger or faster?Get ready for some good news — and some bad — about how music may affect your workout.In this episode of That’s Healthy, Right?, we’ll dig into the research on whether or not music helps increase your maximum strength, how it may actually boost the number of reps you can do, help you push a little bit harder, run a little bit farther, and even recover faster.To ask a question, read the transcript, or learn more, visit bornfitness.com/thats-healthy-right.Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show, and Rate or Review wherever you tune in!Resources:The Psychophysiological Effects of Different Tempo Music on Endurance Versus High-Intensity Performances — Frontiers in PsychologyErgogenic and psychological effects of synchronous music during circuit-type exercise — Psychology of Sport and ExerciseThe effects of music tempo and loudness level on treadmill exercise — ErgonomicsCan Listening to Music Improve Your Workout? — National Center for Health Research Revisiting the exercise heart rate-music tempo preference relationship — Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportEffect of different musical tempo on post-exercise recovery in young adults — Indian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyEffects of self-selected music on maximal bench press strength and strength endurance — Perceptual and Motor SkillsEffects of self-selected music on strength, explosiveness, and mood — Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research The effect of music during warm-up on consecutive anaerobic performance in elite adolescent volleyball players — International Journal of Sports MedicineMusic Mindset: Don’t Wait for Tomorrow — Born Fitness

This episode discusses the science and benefits of using music while working out. *You can request a transcript of this episode by e-mailing: musicalhealththepod@gmail.com Resources: Karageorghis, C.I., Priest, D.L., Williams, L.S., Hirani, R.M., Lannon, K.M., & Bates, B.J. (2010). Ergogenic and psychological effects of synchronous music during circuit-type exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(6), 551-559. Karageorghis, C.I., & Priest, D.L. (2012). Music in the Exercise Domain: A Review and Synthesis (part II). International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(1), 67-84. Hodges, D.A. (2009) Bodily Responses to Music. S. Hallam, I. Cross and M. Thaut (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology, (pp. 121-130). New York: Oxford University Press. Tenenbaum G. A social-cognitive perspective of perceived exertion and exertion tolerance. In: Singer R.N., editor; Hausenblas H.A., Janelle C., editors.Handbook of sport psychology. New York: Wiley; 2001. pp. 810–822. Karageorghis, C. I., Jones, L., Priest, D. L., Akers, R. I., Clarke, A., Perry, J. M., et al.(2011). Revisiting the exercise heart rate-music tempo preference relationship. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 274-284. Karageorghis, C. & Jones, L. (2014). On the stability and relevance of the exercise heart rate-music-tempo preference relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(3), 299-310. North, A. & Hargreaves, D. (2008). Music and Physical Health, In The Social and Applied Psychology of Music, pp. 301-311. Oxford: Oxfor University Press. MacDonald, G. Kreutz, & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Music, health, and wellbeing, 12-24. New York: Oxford University Press. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/caitlin-krater/support

https://construyetufisico.com/entrenamiento/mito-entreno-hiit-y-epoc/ Es posible que haya oído hablar de EPOC, o como se le conoce comúnmente, el efecto de seguir quemando calorías después de hacer ejercicio. Recientemente, se ha puesto muy de moda como una explicación de los beneficios del entrenamiento en intervalos de alta intensidad (HIIT). Muchos dicen que el entrenamiento a intervalos es mejor que el cardio continuo, y específicamente que el entrenamiento a intervalos es más efectivo para perder peso o quemar grasa porque aumenta el EPOC más que el cardio continuo. Según esa lógica, quemas más calorías después de terminar un entrenamiento de intervalos, lo que te llevaría a la pérdida de peso. Si todo el mundo lo dice, debe ser cierto ¿no? Pues no. Este es un caso de investigación que se saca de contexto y se tergiversa para dar un argumento para un tipo de ejercicio sobre otro. Esto sucede con demasiada frecuencia en la industria del fitness. Hay que vender el entrenamiento nuevo, con nuevo equipamiento, nueva suplementación, nueva dieta asociada… Yo llevo por aquí 20 años y he visto pasar unas cuantas ya. Todas son mejores que la anterior, pero cada vez estamos igual, sino peor. ¿Qué es el EPOC? EPOC significa consumo de oxígeno después del ejercicio. Es un aumento en el consumo de oxígeno por encima de los niveles de reposo que ocurre después del ejercicio. El aumento del consumo de oxígeno requiere energía, por lo que EPOC significa que tú quemas calorías incluso después de hace un ejercicio. El propósito del EPOC es recuperar el cuerpo a su estado de reposo y crear adaptaciones las fisiológicas. Algunos estudios han encontrado que el EPOC dura hasta 24 horas, mientras que otros han encontrado que es mucho más corto, menos de una hora en algunos casos. Dependiendo de cómo o a quién le hagan el experimento. A pesar de lo que muchos nos quieren vender, las investigaciones dicen que el efecto del EPOC es bastante pequeño, por tiempo de duración y por intensidad del mismo. Y solo hace que quemes unas cuantas calorías extras. Poco relevantes si las comparas con las quemadas durante el ejercicio en sí. La cantidad de energía extra quemada durante el EPOC es sólo alrededor del 6-15% de la que se usa durante el ejercicio. Por ejemplo, 20 rondas de intervalos de 1 minuto de carrera hechos al 105% del VO2máx, separadas por 2 minutos de descanso quemaron un promedio de 537 calorías durante el ejercicio y 64 calorías adicionales en las 9 horas posteriores a la sesión. También se ha visto grandes diferencias individuales en las respuestas al EPOC. Eso significa que dos personas que hacen exactamente el mismo entrenamiento probablemente quemarían diferentes cantidades de calorías tanto durante como después de la sesión. Esto cambia según tu género, edad, fisiología y estado de entrenamiento. Y factores de estilo de vida como la dieta, el sueño y el estrés. Ten esto en cuenta la próxima vez que escuches que cierto entrenamiento o ejercicio quemará X calorías, o cuando mires el contador de calorías de la máquina del gimnasio, el Apple watch, la pulsera de 20€ de los chinos o la super app que te has bajado “gratis” al movil. La raíz del EPOC y el mito de los intervalos El EPOC aumenta exponencialmente con el aumento de la intensidad del ejercicio para la misma distancia o tiempo. En otras palabras, si corres cinco Km en 25 minutos, tienes un EPOC mayor que si te tiras 50 minutos correr esos mismos cinco Km. Si ese es el caso, tendría sentido que los intervalos, que se realizan a una intensidad mucho más alta que el cardio continuo, tendrían un efecto EPOC mucho mayor. Aunque esta explicación tiene sentido “lógico”, los estudios que han investigado directamente el EPOC entre el entrenamiento a intervalos y el cardio continuo no respaldan exactamente la teoría, especialmente cuando consideran la investigación en su aplicación en el mundo real. ¿Qué dice la investigación sobre el EPOC? Los estudios han demostrado que cuando el gasto de energía se mide durante varias horas después de una sesión de entrenamiento, los intervalos y el cardio continuo queman aproximadamente la misma cantidad de calorías después del ejercicio. Tres estudios vieron que los participantes quemaron una cantidad similar de calorías en las horas posteriores al entrenamiento de intervalos o al cardio de toda la vida, pero la sesión de intervalos solo duró 20 minutos en total. Mientras que el cardio de toda la vida duró 30, 50 o 60 minutos, dependiendo de cuál de los 3 estudios mires. Otro estudio comparó las sesiones de entrenamiento por duración, por lo que los participantes hicieron aproximadamente 45 minutos de entrenamiento por intervalos y 45 minutos de cardio continuo. El EPOC fue más alto después del entrenamiento de intervalos que el cardio continuo, con los participantes quemando aproximadamente 12 calorías por hora más después de los intervalos en comparación con el cardio continuo. Por supuesto, uno de los principales beneficios del entrenamiento de intervalos es la capacidad de tener mejoras parecidas en el estado físico y la pérdida de grasa, pero teniendo que entrenar menos tiempo. Según estos estudios, parece que el entrenamiento de intervalos tiene una mayor capacidad para inducir EPOC que el cardio continuo. Solo lleva un tiempo relativamente corto para que los intervalos creen la misma cantidad de EPOC que el cardio continuo, aunque el ejercicio debe hacerse a una intensidad mucho mayor para lograr ese efecto. Cuando las investigaciones se encuentra con el mundo real Vamos a pensar en todo lo que te he dicho en algo menos teórico, en algo más del día a día. Algo más de ir un rato al gimnasio después de trabajar y antes de liarte con tu casa. Usaré los datos del estudio Skelly como ejemplo. En este estudio, los participantes respiraron a través de una boquilla y se analizó su aire exhalado para medir el consumo de oxígeno y calcular su gasto de energía. El aire expirado se recogió cada pocas horas durante un período de 24 horas. Con un entreno de 1 hora. Durante esa hora, unos descansaron durante toda la hora (grupo control), otros descansaron durante 10 minutos y luego pedalearon durante 50 minutos continuamente a una intensidad moderada, y otro grupo descansaron durante 40 minutos y luego hicieron intervalos de ciclismo de alta intensidad de 10 rondas de 60 segundos pedaleando con 60 segundos de descanso. Aquí está el número promedio de calorías que quemaron durante el ejercicio: Descanso: 125 calorías. 50 min en bicicleta: 547 calorías Intervalos de 20 minutos: 352 calorías. Durante las 24 horas siguientes incluido el período de ejercicio. La hora de entreno y las 23 horas siguientes juntas, aquí están aproximadamente cuántas calorías quemaron: Descanso: 3005 calorías. 50 min en bicicleta: 3464 calorías Intervalos de 20 minutos: 3368 calorías. Quemaron más calorías durante 50 minutos de ciclismo continuo que durante la sesión de intervalos de 20 minutos en la hora de entrenamiento. Y quemaron más calorías totales durante 24 horas cuando hicieron ciclismo continuo. La diferencia entre el cardio continuo y el entrenamiento de intervalos en este caso es de sólo 100 calorías en 24 horas. Más importante aún, como era de esperar, tanto el entrenamiento continuo de cardio como el intervalo quemaron más calorías que no hacer ejercicio. Aproximadamente 350-450 calorías adicionales durante las 24 horas. ¿Hago HIIT o cardio de baja intensidad? A ver, es probable que quemes una cantidad similar de calorías si haces una sesión de intervalo corta pero muy intensa, o una sesión de cardio de intensidad moderada-baja y larga. Si realiza una sesión de intervalos larga, debe tener un efecto EPOC mayor que si haces la misma duración de cardio de intensidad moderada. Pero recuerda que los intervalos deben hacerse a una intensidad muy alta, repito muy alta para tener los beneficios. Estirar una sesión de intervalo más allá de unos 20-25 minutos es inutil, porque la mayoría de las personas no podemos mantener la intensidad necesaria durante todo ese tiempo. Para ser claros, no estoy tratando de desanimarte a no hacer entrenamiento a intervalos. Se ha demostrado que los intervalos son una forma muy eficiente de mejorar la condición física y la pérdida de peso y grasa. Solo que no es el EPOC lo que te dará esos superbeneficios que tan de moda están. Ahora se está viendo que el HIIT puede hacer ciertos cambios hormonales por llevar al cuerpo a un estado de estrés mayor por la alta intensidad. Tener menos hambre, lo que hace que comas menos calorías totales lo que hace que tengas un déficit calórico mayor. O forzar al cuerpo a utilizar grasa como combustible, haciendo que tu organismo sea más eficiente a la hora de gestionar la energía. No te compliques la vida con el entrenamiento Un ejercicio no es "mejor" o "peor" que otro. Las personas que dicen que el entrenamiento por intervalos es mejor que el cardio de baja intensidad (o incluso que es malo), y que tiran del EPOC para validar su afirmación, están equivocados y es un problema. Enfrentar una forma de ejercicio contra otra simplemente hace que sea más difícil para las nosotros hacer lo correcto. Y lo correcto es encontrar un ejercicio, un entrenamiento que disfrutes, que te vaya bien, que te ayude a conseguir tus objetivos y que puedas mantener en el tiempo. Por muy científicamente probado que sea un entrenamiento, si no te gusta o no puedes seguirlo, lo vas a acabar dejando. Y como ya te he dicho antes, no hacer ejercicio si tiene una diferencia grande. Ya te lo he dicho al principio, entrenamientos simples para vidas complicadas. En mi entrenamiento hay entrenos con pesas clásico de toda la vida del estilo press banca 4 X 10 o sentadillas 5 X 5. Hay entrenos metabólicos, tipo HIIT, sesiones de larga duración con intensidad media… Te propongo un poco de todo para que pruebes y compares. Que veas que te gusta más, que te sienta mejor. Todo con una programación, compensando un entreno con otro, una sesión con otra. Así al final de todo podrás decidir que es lo que quieres seguir o trabajar más, y que es lo que no se ajusta a ti, a tu vida, a tus gustos o a tus objetivos. References: 1. Elisabet Børsheim and Roald Bahr. "Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption." Sports Medicine 33, no. 14(2003): 1037-1060. 2. Joseph Laforgia, Robert T. Withers, N. J. Shipp, and Christopher J. Gore. "Comparison of energy expenditure elevations after submaximal and supramaximal running." Journal of Applied Physiology 82, no. 2(1997): 661-666. 3. Joseph Laforgia, Robert T. Withers, and Christopher J. Gore. "Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption." Journal of Sports Sciences 24, no. 12(2006): 1247-1264. 4. Tom J. Hazell, T. Dylan Olver, Craig D. Hamilton, and Peter W.R. Lemon. "Two minutes of sprint-interval exercise elicits 24-hr oxygen consumption similar to that of 30 min of continuous endurance exercise." International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 22, no. 4 (2012): 276-283. 5. Lauren E. Skelly, Patricia C. Andrews, Jenna B. Gillen, Brian J. Martin, Michael E. Percival, and Martin J. Gibala. “High-intensity interval exercise induces 24-h energy expenditure similar to traditional endurance exercise despite reduced time commitment.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 39, no. 7(2014): 1-4. 6. Cameron B. Williams, Jason G.E. Zelt, Laura N. Castellani, Jonathan P. Little, Mary E. Jung, David C. Wright, Michael E. Tschakovsky, and Brendon J. Gurd. “Changes in mechanisms proposed to mediate fat loss following an acute bout of high-intensity interval and endurance exercise.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 38, no. 12(2013): 1–9. 7. Beau Kjerulf Greer, Prawee Sirithienthad, Robert J. Moffatt, Richard T. Marcello, and Lynn B. Panton. “EPOC Comparison Between Isocaloric Bouts of Steady-State Aerobic, Intermittent Aerobic, and Resistance Training.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 86, no. 2(2015): 190–195

https://construyetufisico.com/entrenamiento/mito-entreno-hiit-y-epoc/ Es posible que haya oído hablar de EPOC, o como se le conoce comúnmente, el efecto de seguir quemando calorías después de hacer ejercicio. Recientemente, se ha puesto muy de moda como una explicación de los beneficios del entrenamiento en intervalos de alta intensidad (HIIT). Muchos dicen que el entrenamiento a intervalos es mejor que el cardio continuo, y específicamente que el entrenamiento a intervalos es más efectivo para perder peso o quemar grasa porque aumenta el EPOC más que el cardio continuo. Según esa lógica, quemas más calorías después de terminar un entrenamiento de intervalos, lo que te llevaría a la pérdida de peso. Si todo el mundo lo dice, debe ser cierto ¿no? Pues no. Este es un caso de investigación que se saca de contexto y se tergiversa para dar un argumento para un tipo de ejercicio sobre otro. Esto sucede con demasiada frecuencia en la industria del fitness. Hay que vender el entrenamiento nuevo, con nuevo equipamiento, nueva suplementación, nueva dieta asociada… Yo llevo por aquí 20 años y he visto pasar unas cuantas ya. Todas son mejores que la anterior, pero cada vez estamos igual, sino peor. ¿Qué es el EPOC? EPOC significa consumo de oxígeno después del ejercicio. Es un aumento en el consumo de oxígeno por encima de los niveles de reposo que ocurre después del ejercicio. El aumento del consumo de oxígeno requiere energía, por lo que EPOC significa que tú quemas calorías incluso después de hace un ejercicio. El propósito del EPOC es recuperar el cuerpo a su estado de reposo y crear adaptaciones las fisiológicas. Algunos estudios han encontrado que el EPOC dura hasta 24 horas, mientras que otros han encontrado que es mucho más corto, menos de una hora en algunos casos. Dependiendo de cómo o a quién le hagan el experimento. A pesar de lo que muchos nos quieren vender, las investigaciones dicen que el efecto del EPOC es bastante pequeño, por tiempo de duración y por intensidad del mismo. Y solo hace que quemes unas cuantas calorías extras. Poco relevantes si las comparas con las quemadas durante el ejercicio en sí. La cantidad de energía extra quemada durante el EPOC es sólo alrededor del 6-15% de la que se usa durante el ejercicio. Por ejemplo, 20 rondas de intervalos de 1 minuto de carrera hechos al 105% del VO2máx, separadas por 2 minutos de descanso quemaron un promedio de 537 calorías durante el ejercicio y 64 calorías adicionales en las 9 horas posteriores a la sesión. También se ha visto grandes diferencias individuales en las respuestas al EPOC. Eso significa que dos personas que hacen exactamente el mismo entrenamiento probablemente quemarían diferentes cantidades de calorías tanto durante como después de la sesión. Esto cambia según tu género, edad, fisiología y estado de entrenamiento. Y factores de estilo de vida como la dieta, el sueño y el estrés. Ten esto en cuenta la próxima vez que escuches que cierto entrenamiento o ejercicio quemará X calorías, o cuando mires el contador de calorías de la máquina del gimnasio, el Apple watch, la pulsera de 20€ de los chinos o la super app que te has bajado “gratis” al movil. La raíz del EPOC y el mito de los intervalos El EPOC aumenta exponencialmente con el aumento de la intensidad del ejercicio para la misma distancia o tiempo. En otras palabras, si corres cinco Km en 25 minutos, tienes un EPOC mayor que si te tiras 50 minutos correr esos mismos cinco Km. Si ese es el caso, tendría sentido que los intervalos, que se realizan a una intensidad mucho más alta que el cardio continuo, tendrían un efecto EPOC mucho mayor. Aunque esta explicación tiene sentido “lógico”, los estudios que han investigado directamente el EPOC entre el entrenamiento a intervalos y el cardio continuo no respaldan exactamente la teoría, especialmente cuando consideran la investigación en su aplicación en el mundo real. ¿Qué dice la investigación sobre el EPOC? Los estudios han demostrado que cuando el gasto de energía se mide durante varias horas después de una sesión de entrenamiento, los intervalos y el cardio continuo queman aproximadamente la misma cantidad de calorías después del ejercicio. Tres estudios vieron que los participantes quemaron una cantidad similar de calorías en las horas posteriores al entrenamiento de intervalos o al cardio de toda la vida, pero la sesión de intervalos solo duró 20 minutos en total. Mientras que el cardio de toda la vida duró 30, 50 o 60 minutos, dependiendo de cuál de los 3 estudios mires. Otro estudio comparó las sesiones de entrenamiento por duración, por lo que los participantes hicieron aproximadamente 45 minutos de entrenamiento por intervalos y 45 minutos de cardio continuo. El EPOC fue más alto después del entrenamiento de intervalos que el cardio continuo, con los participantes quemando aproximadamente 12 calorías por hora más después de los intervalos en comparación con el cardio continuo. Por supuesto, uno de los principales beneficios del entrenamiento de intervalos es la capacidad de tener mejoras parecidas en el estado físico y la pérdida de grasa, pero teniendo que entrenar menos tiempo. Según estos estudios, parece que el entrenamiento de intervalos tiene una mayor capacidad para inducir EPOC que el cardio continuo. Solo lleva un tiempo relativamente corto para que los intervalos creen la misma cantidad de EPOC que el cardio continuo, aunque el ejercicio debe hacerse a una intensidad mucho mayor para lograr ese efecto. Cuando las investigaciones se encuentra con el mundo real Vamos a pensar en todo lo que te he dicho en algo menos teórico, en algo más del día a día. Algo más de ir un rato al gimnasio después de trabajar y antes de liarte con tu casa. Usaré los datos del estudio Skelly como ejemplo. En este estudio, los participantes respiraron a través de una boquilla y se analizó su aire exhalado para medir el consumo de oxígeno y calcular su gasto de energía. El aire expirado se recogió cada pocas horas durante un período de 24 horas. Con un entreno de 1 hora. Durante esa hora, unos descansaron durante toda la hora (grupo control), otros descansaron durante 10 minutos y luego pedalearon durante 50 minutos continuamente a una intensidad moderada, y otro grupo descansaron durante 40 minutos y luego hicieron intervalos de ciclismo de alta intensidad de 10 rondas de 60 segundos pedaleando con 60 segundos de descanso. Aquí está el número promedio de calorías que quemaron durante el ejercicio: Descanso: 125 calorías. 50 min en bicicleta: 547 calorías Intervalos de 20 minutos: 352 calorías. Durante las 24 horas siguientes incluido el período de ejercicio. La hora de entreno y las 23 horas siguientes juntas, aquí están aproximadamente cuántas calorías quemaron: Descanso: 3005 calorías. 50 min en bicicleta: 3464 calorías Intervalos de 20 minutos: 3368 calorías. Quemaron más calorías durante 50 minutos de ciclismo continuo que durante la sesión de intervalos de 20 minutos en la hora de entrenamiento. Y quemaron más calorías totales durante 24 horas cuando hicieron ciclismo continuo. La diferencia entre el cardio continuo y el entrenamiento de intervalos en este caso es de sólo 100 calorías en 24 horas. Más importante aún, como era de esperar, tanto el entrenamiento continuo de cardio como el intervalo quemaron más calorías que no hacer ejercicio. Aproximadamente 350-450 calorías adicionales durante las 24 horas. ¿Hago HIIT o cardio de baja intensidad? A ver, es probable que quemes una cantidad similar de calorías si haces una sesión de intervalo corta pero muy intensa, o una sesión de cardio de intensidad moderada-baja y larga. Si realiza una sesión de intervalos larga, debe tener un efecto EPOC mayor que si haces la misma duración de cardio de intensidad moderada. Pero recuerda que los intervalos deben hacerse a una intensidad muy alta, repito muy alta para tener los beneficios. Estirar una sesión de intervalo más allá de unos 20-25 minutos es inutil, porque la mayoría de las personas no podemos mantener la intensidad necesaria durante todo ese tiempo. Para ser claros, no estoy tratando de desanimarte a no hacer entrenamiento a intervalos. Se ha demostrado que los intervalos son una forma muy eficiente de mejorar la condición física y la pérdida de peso y grasa. Solo que no es el EPOC lo que te dará esos superbeneficios que tan de moda están. Ahora se está viendo que el HIIT puede hacer ciertos cambios hormonales por llevar al cuerpo a un estado de estrés mayor por la alta intensidad. Tener menos hambre, lo que hace que comas menos calorías totales lo que hace que tengas un déficit calórico mayor. O forzar al cuerpo a utilizar grasa como combustible, haciendo que tu organismo sea más eficiente a la hora de gestionar la energía. No te compliques la vida con el entrenamiento Un ejercicio no es "mejor" o "peor" que otro. Las personas que dicen que el entrenamiento por intervalos es mejor que el cardio de baja intensidad (o incluso que es malo), y que tiran del EPOC para validar su afirmación, están equivocados y es un problema. Enfrentar una forma de ejercicio contra otra simplemente hace que sea más difícil para las nosotros hacer lo correcto. Y lo correcto es encontrar un ejercicio, un entrenamiento que disfrutes, que te vaya bien, que te ayude a conseguir tus objetivos y que puedas mantener en el tiempo. Por muy científicamente probado que sea un entrenamiento, si no te gusta o no puedes seguirlo, lo vas a acabar dejando. Y como ya te he dicho antes, no hacer ejercicio si tiene una diferencia grande. Ya te lo he dicho al principio, entrenamientos simples para vidas complicadas. En mi entrenamiento hay entrenos con pesas clásico de toda la vida del estilo press banca 4 X 10 o sentadillas 5 X 5. Hay entrenos metabólicos, tipo HIIT, sesiones de larga duración con intensidad media… Te propongo un poco de todo para que pruebes y compares. Que veas que te gusta más, que te sienta mejor. Todo con una programación, compensando un entreno con otro, una sesión con otra. Así al final de todo podrás decidir que es lo que quieres seguir o trabajar más, y que es lo que no se ajusta a ti, a tu vida, a tus gustos o a tus objetivos. References: 1. Elisabet Børsheim and Roald Bahr. "Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption." Sports Medicine 33, no. 14(2003): 1037-1060. 2. Joseph Laforgia, Robert T. Withers, N. J. Shipp, and Christopher J. Gore. "Comparison of energy expenditure elevations after submaximal and supramaximal running." Journal of Applied Physiology 82, no. 2(1997): 661-666. 3. Joseph Laforgia, Robert T. Withers, and Christopher J. Gore. "Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption." Journal of Sports Sciences 24, no. 12(2006): 1247-1264. 4. Tom J. Hazell, T. Dylan Olver, Craig D. Hamilton, and Peter W.R. Lemon. "Two minutes of sprint-interval exercise elicits 24-hr oxygen consumption similar to that of 30 min of continuous endurance exercise." International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 22, no. 4 (2012): 276-283. 5. Lauren E. Skelly, Patricia C. Andrews, Jenna B. Gillen, Brian J. Martin, Michael E. Percival, and Martin J. Gibala. “High-intensity interval exercise induces 24-h energy expenditure similar to traditional endurance exercise despite reduced time commitment.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 39, no. 7(2014): 1-4. 6. Cameron B. Williams, Jason G.E. Zelt, Laura N. Castellani, Jonathan P. Little, Mary E. Jung, David C. Wright, Michael E. Tschakovsky, and Brendon J. Gurd. “Changes in mechanisms proposed to mediate fat loss following an acute bout of high-intensity interval and endurance exercise.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 38, no. 12(2013): 1–9. 7. Beau Kjerulf Greer, Prawee Sirithienthad, Robert J. Moffatt, Richard T. Marcello, and Lynn B. Panton. “EPOC Comparison Between Isocaloric Bouts of Steady-State Aerobic, Intermittent Aerobic, and Resistance Training.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 86, no. 2(2015): 190–195

We discuss an article compiled to address the future of PE research and how the authors argue it should take a social justice perspective. In the podcast with me are Jen Walton Fissette (@Jwalton_Fisette), Erin Centeio (@ecenteio) and Kevin Richards (@KARRichards14). The article is a part of a series published in RQES that looks forward and plots out the future research questions in our field. Full Cite for article: Jennifer L. Walton-Fisette, K. Andrew R. Richards, Erin E. Centeio, Todd R. Pennington & Tim Hopper (2019): Exploring Future Research in Physical Education: Espousing a Social Justice Perspective, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1615606

This episode highlights the FIT (Fitness Integrated with Technology) Unit and explores students' perceptions of technology integration. We also discuss students perceptions of homework in PE and attitude toward PE. You can find the theory breakdown for the theory of planned behavior between episodes 4 and 5, it is the first theory breakdown we did. This paper is published on-line first with Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. The podcast is guest hosted by Dr. Stephen Harvey (@drstephenharvey) who hosts a podcast called "positive pedagogy for sport coaching." Risto Marttinen (@ristomarttinen) is an assistant professor at George Mason University. Dr. David Daum is at San Jose State University, Dr. Ray Fredrick is at Queens College, Joshua Santiago is currently in a Masters program at Cal State Fullerton, Steve Silverman is with Teachers College Columbia University. Full Cite: Marttinen, R., Daum, D., Fredrick III, R. N., Santiago, J., & Silverman, S. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Technology Integration During the FIT Unit. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 1-11. Other articles related to this project: Marttinen, R., Fredrick III, R. N., & Silverman, S. (2018). Changes in student attitude toward physical education across a unit of instruction. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(1), 62-70. Marttinen, R., Fredrick III, R. N., & Silverman, S. S. (2018). Middle School Students’ Free-living Physical Activity on Physical Education Days, Non-physical Education Days, and Weekends. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 7(1), 5-12

For Show Notes and Coach McKeefery's Website - http://www.RonMcKeefery.com Now Available on iTunes http://bit.ly/1bPlMei Pick up your copy of Coach McKeefery's #1 Amazon International Bestseller "CEO Strength Coach" - http://www.CEOStrengthCoach.com Please “Thank” our sponsors who bring this show to you for free:PLAE - http://plae.us/Samson - https://www.samsonequipment.comIron Grip - http://www.irongrip.com/Intek - https://intekstrength.com/Train Heroic - http://trainheroic.com/Gym Aware - https://kinetic.com.au/gymaware.htmlWoodway - http://www.woodway.com/Versa Pulley - http://versaclimber.com/vp-versapulley/ Jonathan Mike, PhD, CSCS*D, NSCA-CPT*D, USAW, NKT, is a currently a Visiting Professor in Kinesiology at University of Southern Mississippi, and has been an Assistant Professor in the Exercise Science Program at Lindenwood University in St. Charles, MO. He earned his PhD in Exercise Science at the University of New Mexico (Albuquerque). He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Exercise Science from Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, Kentucky while also serving as a strength and conditioning assistant. He also worked for the University of Louisville as a strength coach and has been a frequent contributor and guest host of several websites and radio shows. He has been a member of the NSCA Certification Exam Developing Committee (NSCA-CPT) and Job Analysis Committee, and a current member of the Personal Trainers Special Interest Group. He has spoken at numerous NSCA local, state, regional and national conferences including the 2014, 2015, and 2016, and 2017 NSCA Personal Trainers Conference, and other organizations. He has authored or co-authored various works related to sports nutrition and strength and conditioning. Further, he has been published in the Strength and Conditioning Journal and Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research for the NSCA and have both authored & co-authored multiple book chapters in areas of sports nutrition and strength training and conditioning. In addition, he has co-authored many articles on a variety of topics in IDEA Fitness Journal and has authored articles for many consumer magazines including Oxygen Mag, Bodybuilding.com, Muscle and Body, Muscle Mag, and Flex. He is a journal editor for both Strength and Conditioning Journal, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, NSCA Coach, and Research Quarterly for Exercise. He has been competing in the sport of Strongman for several years. His research interests include eccentric training and adaptations, strength and power development, functional movement, exercise and energy metabolism, and areas of sports nutrition.   In This Episode We Discuss: What experience in his journey impacted him the most, and Why.Biggest mistake he has made and how he learned from it.Benefits of eccentric training. Use of non traditional/strongman implements into sport S&C.  Blending classroom with the weight room.  Best piece of coaching advice he has ever received.His favorite quote, Book/App/Website recommendation.

For Show Notes and Coach McKeefery's Website - http://www.RonMcKeefery.com Now Available on iTunes http://bit.ly/1bPlMei Pick up your copy of Coach McKeefery's #1 Amazon International Bestseller "CEO Strength Coach" - http://www.CEOStrengthCoach.com Please “Thank” our sponsors who bring this show to you for free:PLAE - http://plae.us/Samson - https://www.samsonequipment.comIron Grip - http://www.irongrip.com/Intek - https://intekstrength.com/Train Heroic - http://trainheroic.com/Gym Aware - https://kinetic.com.au/gymaware.htmlWoodway - http://www.woodway.com/Versa Pulley - http://versaclimber.com/vp-versapulley/ Jonathan Mike, PhD, CSCS*D, NSCA-CPT*D, USAW, NKT, is a currently a Visiting Professor in Kinesiology at University of Southern Mississippi, and has been an Assistant Professor in the Exercise Science Program at Lindenwood University in St. Charles, MO. He earned his PhD in Exercise Science at the University of New Mexico (Albuquerque). He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Exercise Science from Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, Kentucky while also serving as a strength and conditioning assistant. He also worked for the University of Louisville as a strength coach and has been a frequent contributor and guest host of several websites and radio shows. He has been a member of the NSCA Certification Exam Developing Committee (NSCA-CPT) and Job Analysis Committee, and a current member of the Personal Trainers Special Interest Group. He has spoken at numerous NSCA local, state, regional and national conferences including the 2014, 2015, and 2016, and 2017 NSCA Personal Trainers Conference, and other organizations. He has authored or co-authored various works related to sports nutrition and strength and conditioning. Further, he has been published in the Strength and Conditioning Journal and Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research for the NSCA and have both authored & co-authored multiple book chapters in areas of sports nutrition and strength training and conditioning. In addition, he has co-authored many articles on a variety of topics in IDEA Fitness Journal and has authored articles for many consumer magazines including Oxygen Mag, Bodybuilding.com, Muscle and Body, Muscle Mag, and Flex. He is a journal editor for both Strength and Conditioning Journal, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, NSCA Coach, and Research Quarterly for Exercise. He has been competing in the sport of Strongman for several years. His research interests include eccentric training and adaptations, strength and power development, functional movement, exercise and energy metabolism, and areas of sports nutrition.   In This Episode We Discuss: What experience in his journey impacted him the most, and Why.Biggest mistake he has made and how he learned from it.Benefits of eccentric training. Use of non traditional/strongman implements into sport S&C.  Blending classroom with the weight room.  Best piece of coaching advice he has ever received.His favorite quote, Book/App/Website recommendation.

Dr. Williams is Professor and Chair, Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation at University of Utah. Dr. Williams has previously held senior leadership positions in the UK (Head of Life Sciences, Brunel University London) and Australia (Associate Dean for Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney).    His research interests focus on the neural and psychological mechanisms underpinning the acquisition and development of perceptual-cognitive and perceptual-motor skills. He has published almost 180 journal articles in peer-reviewed outlets in numerous fields including exercise and sports science (e.g., Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Sports Medicine), experimental psychology (e.g., Acta Psychologica, British Journal of Psychology, Experimental Psychology, Visual Cognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology), neuroscience (Neuroscience Letters, Human Brain Mapping, Neuroimage) and medicine (The Lancet, British Medical Journal, Medical Education). He has written 15 books, almost 80 book chapters, 60 professional articles, 91 journal abstracts, and has delivered almost 200 keynote and invited lectures in over 30 countries. He is Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Sports Science and Executive Editor for the journal Human Movement Science. Also, he sits on the editorial boards of the Scandinavian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, and Frontiers of Cognition, and Frontiers in Psychology (Performance Science). Moreover, he has acted as a Guest Editor of special issues for prestigious journals such as Journal of Sport Sciences, Journal of Motor Behavior, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, and Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.   Subscribe to the Way of Champions Podcast on iTunes   Show Notes 5:45 He was one of first UK graduates in Sport and Exercise Science 8:20 Mark discusses the concepts of reinvestment and paralysis by analysis 17:15 The role of the coach in practices 25:45 Differences between specialization and early engagement 35:35 Coaching is an art form but there’s no reason it cannot be informed by science 48:20 Mark’s biggest coaching pet peeve   Get in Touch Email: mark.williams@health.utah.edu   Join Us at Way of Champions 2018   Take your Coaching to the Next Level with Transformational Coaching     If you are enjoying our podcast, please help us out and leave a review on iTunes. How to leave an iTunes rating or review for a podcast from your iPhone or iPad   Launch Apple’s Podcast app. Tap the Search tab. Enter the name Way of Champions. Tap the blue Search key at the bottom right. Tap the album art for the Way of Champions podcast. Tap the Reviews tab. Tap Write a Review at the bottom. Thanks so much, every review helps us to spread this message!

  Nesse episódio eu, Heric Lopes, conto com a presença dos fisioterapeutas Leonardo Dias, Larissa Merenda e Laura Loturco para discutir o alongamento muscular na atividade física. Participação especial de Rurik Tullio. Confira!   Esse podcast é parte do canal Fisio na Pauta. Nesse canal, assuntos relevantes serão discutidos usando a ciência e o ceticismo como pedras fundamentais. Nossa intenção é oferecer informação sobre saúde, ciência, reabilitação e claro... Fisioterapia!   Esse podcast é uma produção independente elaborado por voluntários dispostos a disseminar conhecimento em prol da evolução da ciência da Fisioterapia.   O conteúdo do programa é meramente informativo e nada de ser utilizado como conselho médico, uma vez que o conteúdo científico está constantemente evoluindo. Em caso de sintomas e/ou dúvidas, recomendo procurar um profissional da área da saúde.   Você pode acompanhar o Fisio na Pauta Podcast das seguintes maneiras: website: www.fisionapauta.com.br email: contato@fisionapauta.com.br Twitter: @fisionapauta Facebook: @canalfisionapauta Instagram: fisionapauta   Deixe seu comentário no iTunes!   Quer colaborar e apoiar o canal Fisio na Pauta? Acesse:   http://www.fisionapauta.com.br/apoie/   Ouça, divulgue, compartilhe!   Músicas: Captain Planet - Enter the Esperanto - www.youtube.com/watch?v=20OPSVdDw…6Vx1Cl1CA&index=1 The Touré-Rachel Collective - Azawade - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A0VXjKwYHs Márcio Cardoso - Alongar os Afetos (feat. Carlinhos Patriolino) - Terra EnCantada: Canções de Acordar.   Referências bibliográficas: Baxter, C., Mc Naughton, L. R., Sparks, A., Norton, L., & Bentley, D. (2017). Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners. Research in Sports Medicine, 25(1), 78-90.   Muanjai, P., Jones, D. A., Mickevicius, M., Satkunskiene, D., Snieckus, A., Rutkauskaite, R., ... & Kamandulis, S. (2017). The effects of 4 weeks stretching training to the point of pain on flexibility and muscle tendon unit properties. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 117(8), 1713-1725.   O’Sullivan, K., McAulliffe, S., & Lehmann, G. (2014). Injury Prevention and Management among Athletic Populations: To stretch or not to stretch. Sports Rehabilitation, 3, 624-628.   Junior, R. M., Berton, R., de Souza, T. M. F., Chacon-Mikahil, M. P. T., & Cavaglieri, C. R. (2017). Effect of the flexibility training performed immediately before resistance training on muscle hypertrophy, maximum strength and flexibility. European journal of applied physiology, 117(4), 767-774.   Page, P. (2012). Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. International journal of sports physical therapy, 7(1), 109.   Freitas, S. R., & Mil-Homens, P. (2015). Effect of 8-week high-intensity stretching training on biceps femoris architecture. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(6), 1737-1740.   Marshall, P. W., Cashman, A., & Cheema, B. S. (2011). A randomized controlled trial for the effect of passive stretching on measures of hamstring extensibility, passive stiffness, strength, and stretch tolerance. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(6), 535-540.   Weppler, C. H., & Magnusson, S. P. (2010). Increasing muscle extensibility: a matter of increasing length or modifying sensation?. Physical therapy, 90(3), 438-449.   McHugh, M. P., & Cosgrave, C. H. (2010). To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 20(2), 169-181.   Jamtvedt, G., Herbert, R. D., Flottorp, S., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Håvelsrud, K., Barratt, A., ... & Oxman, A. D. (2010). A pragmatic randomised trial of stretching before and after physical activity to prevent injury and soreness. British journal of sports medicine, 44(14), 1002-1009.   Bacurau, R., Monteiro, G., Ugrinowitsch, C., Tricoli, V., Cabral, L., & Aoki, M. (2009). Acute effect of a ballistic and a static stretching exercise bout on flexibility and maximal strength. Journal of  Strength and Conditioning Research, 23, 304–308.   Barnes, K., & Kilding, A. (2015). Running economy: Measurement, norms, and determining factors. Sports Medicine – Open, 1–15.   Bonacci, J., Chapman, A., Blanch, P., & Vicenzino, B. (2009). Neuromuscular adaptations to training injury and passive interventions. Sports Medicine, 39(11), 903–921.   Herbert, R., de Noronha, M., & Kamper, S. (2011). Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration, 7, 1–50.   High, D., Howley, E., & Franks, B. (1989). The effects of static stretching and warm-up on prevention of delayed-onset muscle soreness. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(4), 357–361.   Nelson, A., Driscoll, N., Landin, D., Young, M., & Schexnayder, I. (2005). Acute effects of passive muscle stretching on sprint performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 449–454.   Saunders, P., Pyne, D., Telford, R., & Hawley, J. (2004). Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Medicine, 34(7), 465–485.   Thacker, S., Gilchrist, J., Stroup, D., & Kimsey, D. (2003). The impact of stretching on sports injury risk: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 36 (3), 371–378.   van Mechelen, W., Hlobil, H., Kemper, H., Voorn, W., & de Jongh, H. (1993). Prevention of running injuries by warm-up, cool-down, and stretching exercises. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 21, 711–719.   Wilson, J., & Flanagan, E. (2008). The role of elastic energy in activities with high force and power requirements: A brief review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(5), 1705–1715.   Wilson, J., Hornbuckle, L., Kim, J., Ugrinowitsch, C., Lee, S., Zourdos, M. ... Panton, L. (2010). Effects of static stretching on energy cost and running endurance performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(9), 2274–2279.   Young, W., & Wand Elliott, S. (2001). Acute effects of static stretching, proprioceptive neuromus- cular facilitation stretching, and maximum voluntary contractions on explosive force production and jumping performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 72, 273–279.

  Nesse episódio eu, Heric Lopes, conto com a presença dos fisioterapeutas Leonardo Dias, Larissa Merenda e Laura Loturco para discutir o alongamento muscular na atividade física. Participação especial de Rurik Tullio. Confira!   Esse podcast é parte do canal Fisio na Pauta. Nesse canal, assuntos relevantes serão discutidos usando a ciência e o ceticismo como pedras fundamentais. Nossa intenção é oferecer informação sobre saúde, ciência, reabilitação e claro... Fisioterapia!   Esse podcast é uma produção independente elaborado por voluntários dispostos a disseminar conhecimento em prol da evolução da ciência da Fisioterapia.   O conteúdo do programa é meramente informativo e nada de ser utilizado como conselho médico, uma vez que o conteúdo científico está constantemente evoluindo. Em caso de sintomas e/ou dúvidas, recomendo procurar um profissional da área da saúde.   Você pode acompanhar o Fisio na Pauta Podcast das seguintes maneiras: website: www.fisionapauta.com.br email: contato@fisionapauta.com.br Twitter: @fisionapauta Facebook: @canalfisionapauta Instagram: fisionapauta   Deixe seu comentário no iTunes!   Quer colaborar e apoiar o canal Fisio na Pauta? Acesse:   http://www.fisionapauta.com.br/apoie/   Ouça, divulgue, compartilhe!   Músicas: Captain Planet - Enter the Esperanto - www.youtube.com/watch?v=20OPSVdDw…6Vx1Cl1CA&index=1 The Touré-Rachel Collective - Azawade - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A0VXjKwYHs Márcio Cardoso - Alongar os Afetos (feat. Carlinhos Patriolino) - Terra EnCantada: Canções de Acordar.   Referências bibliográficas: Baxter, C., Mc Naughton, L. R., Sparks, A., Norton, L., & Bentley, D. (2017). Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners. Research in Sports Medicine, 25(1), 78-90.   Muanjai, P., Jones, D. A., Mickevicius, M., Satkunskiene, D., Snieckus, A., Rutkauskaite, R., ... & Kamandulis, S. (2017). The effects of 4 weeks stretching training to the point of pain on flexibility and muscle tendon unit properties. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 117(8), 1713-1725.   O’Sullivan, K., McAulliffe, S., & Lehmann, G. (2014). Injury Prevention and Management among Athletic Populations: To stretch or not to stretch. Sports Rehabilitation, 3, 624-628.   Junior, R. M., Berton, R., de Souza, T. M. F., Chacon-Mikahil, M. P. T., & Cavaglieri, C. R. (2017). Effect of the flexibility training performed immediately before resistance training on muscle hypertrophy, maximum strength and flexibility. European journal of applied physiology, 117(4), 767-774.   Page, P. (2012). Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. International journal of sports physical therapy, 7(1), 109.   Freitas, S. R., & Mil-Homens, P. (2015). Effect of 8-week high-intensity stretching training on biceps femoris architecture. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(6), 1737-1740.   Marshall, P. W., Cashman, A., & Cheema, B. S. (2011). A randomized controlled trial for the effect of passive stretching on measures of hamstring extensibility, passive stiffness, strength, and stretch tolerance. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(6), 535-540.   Weppler, C. H., & Magnusson, S. P. (2010). Increasing muscle extensibility: a matter of increasing length or modifying sensation?. Physical therapy, 90(3), 438-449.   McHugh, M. P., & Cosgrave, C. H. (2010). To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 20(2), 169-181.   Jamtvedt, G., Herbert, R. D., Flottorp, S., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Håvelsrud, K., Barratt, A., ... & Oxman, A. D. (2010). A pragmatic randomised trial of stretching before and after physical activity to prevent injury and soreness. British journal of sports medicine, 44(14), 1002-1009.   Bacurau, R., Monteiro, G., Ugrinowitsch, C., Tricoli, V., Cabral, L., & Aoki, M. (2009). Acute effect of a ballistic and a static stretching exercise bout on flexibility and maximal strength. Journal of  Strength and Conditioning Research, 23, 304–308.   Barnes, K., & Kilding, A. (2015). Running economy: Measurement, norms, and determining factors. Sports Medicine – Open, 1–15.   Bonacci, J., Chapman, A., Blanch, P., & Vicenzino, B. (2009). Neuromuscular adaptations to training injury and passive interventions. Sports Medicine, 39(11), 903–921.   Herbert, R., de Noronha, M., & Kamper, S. (2011). Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration, 7, 1–50.   High, D., Howley, E., & Franks, B. (1989). The effects of static stretching and warm-up on prevention of delayed-onset muscle soreness. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(4), 357–361.   Nelson, A., Driscoll, N., Landin, D., Young, M., & Schexnayder, I. (2005). Acute effects of passive muscle stretching on sprint performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 449–454.   Saunders, P., Pyne, D., Telford, R., & Hawley, J. (2004). Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Medicine, 34(7), 465–485.   Thacker, S., Gilchrist, J., Stroup, D., & Kimsey, D. (2003). The impact of stretching on sports injury risk: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 36 (3), 371–378.   van Mechelen, W., Hlobil, H., Kemper, H., Voorn, W., & de Jongh, H. (1993). Prevention of running injuries by warm-up, cool-down, and stretching exercises. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 21, 711–719.   Wilson, J., & Flanagan, E. (2008). The role of elastic energy in activities with high force and power requirements: A brief review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(5), 1705–1715.   Wilson, J., Hornbuckle, L., Kim, J., Ugrinowitsch, C., Lee, S., Zourdos, M. ... Panton, L. (2010). Effects of static stretching on energy cost and running endurance performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(9), 2274–2279.   Young, W., & Wand Elliott, S. (2001). Acute effects of static stretching, proprioceptive neuromus- cular facilitation stretching, and maximum voluntary contractions on explosive force production and jumping performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 72, 273–279.

Dr Tim Lee discusses block vs. interweve practice, the 10 000 hour theory, and much more on the research behind developing the ideal practice plan. Tim Lee is a retired Professor of Kinesiology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario and is an Honorary Director with the PGA of Canada. He has published more than 80 papers on the topics of motor control and motor skill acquisition in peer-reviewed journals. He is the author of Motor Control in Everyday Actions, and is the co-author with Richard Schmidt of Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, which is now in its 5th edition. Tim has served as an editor for the Journal of Motor Behavior and the Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, and as an editorial board member for the Psychological Review and the Journal of Motor Learning and Development. His research has been supported by numerous grants, including continuous funding (since 1984) by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Tim is a past president and Fellow of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology, and an International Fellow in the National Academy of Kinesiology.

In this podcast, Dr Tim Lee discusses the principles of focus of attention in golfers and how to structure your golf lesson to have the highest level of attention possible. Tim Lee is a retired Professor of Kinesiology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario and is an Honorary Director with the PGA of Canada. He has published more than 80 papers on the topics of motor control and motor skill acquisition in peer-reviewed journals. He is the author of Motor Control in Everyday Actions, and is the co-author with Richard Schmidt of Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, which is now in its 5th edition. Tim has served as an editor for the Journal of Motor Behavior and the Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, and as an editorial board member for the Psychological Review and the Journal of Motor Learning and Development. His research has been supported by numerous grants, including continuous funding (since 1984) by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Tim is a past president and Fellow of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology, and an International Fellow in the National Academy of Kinesiology.