POPULARITY
Hosted by bob allen
7 episodes with bob allen
3 episodes with bob allen
2 episodes with bob allen
2 episodes with bob allen
2 episodes with bob allen
17 episodes with bob allen
2 episodes with bob allen
5 episodes with bob allen
2 episodes with bob allen
On this episode, siblings chat with siblings as Jen and Frank are joined by Rick and Bob Allen. Sons of a Disney Legend, Rick and Bob share personalanecdotes spanning their combined careers in Walt Disney Imagineering, and Operations at Disney Parks and Resorts around the world. Learn more about Rick HERE Learn more about Bob HERE Learn more about 'Of Mice and Men' HERE Get a vacation quote from Vasilia at ET Family Travel today! *** Dillo's Diz 55 Gerard St. #987. Huntington, NY 11743 Affiliate Links Music & Themes produced by Matt Harvey. Feedspot's Top 25 Siblings Podcasts You Must Follow AND Top 100 Disney Podcasts You Must Follow. ONE STOP SHOP ALL THE @DillosDiz LINKS! DIllo's Diz Resort Guests: Theme Park Rob, Jeffers, Skipper Bob, Nathaniel Hardy, Louis and Dr. Val of #FigmentsInTime, Lee Taylor, Maz, Troy with the Disney Assembled Podcast, Judy Van Cleef, Ryan Alexander, PixieDustPhD, Jason Romans, Holly Maddock, Lexi Andrea, Adam Elmers, DCLDuo, Disney Assembled Question or Comment? We LOVE interacting with listeners! FOLLOW Dillo's Diz on INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/dillosdiz/ FOLLOW Dillo's Diz on YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/dillosdiz FOLLOW Dillo's Diz on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/dillosdiz
"Stories are emotional, and when you connect with people emotionally, it sticks." Stories are the master teacher of the world. Over the years, I've seen firsthand that facts may fade, but a good story that is told with feeling and authenticity will stick with you forever. Today, we took that idea to the next level, gathering at UCF's Rosen College of Hospitality Management for our first ever “Stories That Work” workshop. Jody sparked the idea, and it was a great one. We brought together Disney veterans and leaders like Bob Allen, Rick Allen, and Djuan Rivers, all with stories that reach deep into Disney's history and heart. What I've found is that every cast member and guest has a story. Those stories shape how we learn, lead, and serve. Whether it's a family returning to Walt Disney World for generations, or a cast member sharing their challenges and triumphs, there's always a lesson wrapped inside. The stories we share aren't just for entertainment—they're teaching tools. They spark emotion, create connections, and help us remember the lessons that matter most. It's not enough to just know the facts or have the right degree; you've got to keep learning and collecting stories from those around you. That knowledge, shared through stories, is what makes you memorable and effective, whether you're leading a large operation or just making someone's day a little brighter. Stay committed to learning and telling stories. The more you grow, the more magic you bring to others. Resources The Cockerell Academy About Lee Cockerell Mainstreet Leader Jody Maberry Travel Guidance Magical Vacation Planners are my preferred travel advisors. Reach out to have them help plan your next vacation. You can reach them at 407-442-2694.
Johnny Cash - "I Can't Help It" [0:00:00] Johnny Cash - "You Win Again" [0:06:20] Toothpick Tommy and the Truckers - "Bip Bop" [0:08:24] Billy Riley - "Down By The Riverside" [0:10:21] Peck Touchton - "You've Changed Your Tune" [0:12:31] Music behind DJ: Freddy King - "The Bossa Nova Watusi Twist" [0:15:16] Billy Mize - "Solid Sender" [0:18:00] Davy Mills - "Trenton State Prison" [0:20:42] Jerry Reed - "Have Blues, Will Travel" [0:24:35] Jimmy Gene Smith - "Bottle of Gin" [0:26:52] Tennessee Ernie Ford - "Sixteen Tons" [0:28:09] Music behind DJ: Freddy King - "The Bossa Nova Watusi Twist" [0:30:43] Johnny Sea - "Stranger" [0:33:30] Sanford Clark - "A Cheat" [0:36:21] Jean Shepard - "Second Fiddle (To An Old Guitar)" [0:38:35] Gene Norton - "Gravy Train" [0:40:51] Gary D. Whatley - "Where's My Baby" [0:43:14] Music behind DJ: Freddy King - "The Bossa Nova Watusi Twist" [0:46:03] Merle Haggard - "I'm a Lonesome Fugitive" [0:47:58] Bob Allen and the Wanderers - "It's About Time" [0:51:37] Bill Cleaton - "Lovers Hall Of Shame" [0:52:39] Hershel Hamilton - "Is It Really Warm In Tampa" [0:54:47] https://www.wfmu.org/playlists/shows/149109
Johnny Cash - "I Can't Help It" [0:00:00] Johnny Cash - "You Win Again" [0:06:20] Toothpick Tommy and the Truckers - "Bip Bop" [0:08:24] Billy Riley - "Down By The Riverside" [0:10:21] Peck Touchton - "You've Changed Your Tune" [0:12:31] Music behind DJ: Freddy King - "The Bossa Nova Watusi Twist" [0:15:16] Billy Mize - "Solid Sender" [0:18:00] Davy Mills - "Trenton State Prison" [0:20:42] Jerry Reed - "Have Blues, Will Travel" [0:24:35] Jimmy Gene Smith - "Bottle of Gin" [0:26:52] Tennessee Ernie Ford - "Sixteen Tons" [0:28:09] Music behind DJ: Freddy King - "The Bossa Nova Watusi Twist" [0:30:43] Johnny Sea - "Stranger" [0:33:30] Sanford Clark - "A Cheat" [0:36:21] Jean Shepard - "Second Fiddle (To An Old Guitar)" [0:38:35] Gene Norton - "Gravy Train" [0:40:51] Gary D. Whatley - "Where's My Baby" [0:43:14] Music behind DJ: Freddy King - "The Bossa Nova Watusi Twist" [0:46:03] Merle Haggard - "I'm a Lonesome Fugitive" [0:47:58] Bob Allen and the Wanderers - "It's About Time" [0:51:37] Bill Cleaton - "Lovers Hall Of Shame" [0:52:39] Hershel Hamilton - "Is It Really Warm In Tampa" [0:54:47] https://www.wfmu.org/playlists/shows/149109
"If you want to invent an innovative future, first, you have to start where you are." Ever wonder what a crow named Bernice has to do with innovation? Bob Allen returns to share more from his fascinating journey from executive leadership with Disney to his latest venture, Zenovation. Our conversation highlights how blending personal passions can lead to groundbreaking ideas. Read the blog for more highlights from this episode. Connect with Bob Allen Bob's Website https://zennovationnetwork.com/ Connect with Jody www.jodymaberry.com About Jody - https://jodymaberry.com/about-jody-maberry/ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/sugarjmaberry LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/jodymaberry/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/sugarjmaberry/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/jodymaberry
“What's my job? That's not the right question. It should be ‘what am I really good at ?' and ‘what makes me happy?' and ‘what gets me excited?' Lead with those questions. The job that fits those answers may be very different over the course of your life, but they are where the answer lies." Rick and Bob Allen are incredible innovators who have made significant impacts within the Walt Disney Company.... and beyond. In this episode, we discuss their multiple professional shifts, including the reality of being offered to buy your business from Disney. They share stories that highlight unlearning fear and embracing creativity, the power of storytelling, and the importance of authentic relationships. Some key takeaways:
Dave Kranz creator of the WeFishASA podcast would like you to listen to this week's episode. Dan Johnston talks about top water bass fishing. Children's author Bob Allen tells us about his latest kids fishing book. Jay Przekurat Elite Angler talks about qualifying for the 2025 BASS MASTER CLASSIC.
"Here, you're allowed to show your passion on your sleeve. When you go in an interview, if you grew up watching Snow White and that made an impression on you, you can say that and it matters." Connect with Bob and Rick https://zennovationnetwork.com/ Connect with Jody www.jodymaberry.com About Jody - https://jodymaberry.com/about-jody-maberry/ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/sugarjmaberry LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/jodymaberry/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/sugarjmaberry/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/jodymaberry Joining me are two very distinguished guests, Rick Allen and Bob Allen. After significant careers with Disneyland and Walt Disney World operations, they bring a treasure trove of fascinating stories. Above all is their message that the magic of Disney isn't just in the rides but in the relentless attention to detail and a deeply ingrained culture of excellence. There are a number of ways that Disney has intentionally set themselves up as a pillar of excellence. Much in thanks to their commitment to things ranging from attention to detail to the culture of mentorship and leadership. In this episode, Bob and Rick share about: Inspirational Influences: Rick and Bob share remarkable stories of key figures like Walt Disney, Dick Nunez, and Dottie Enright, emphasizing the powerful impact of leadership and mentorship. Disney's Attention to Detail: Discover how Disney's culture of cleanliness and detail, from picking up trash to blockbuster innovations like the "earth berm," shapes unforgettable guest experiences. Behind-the-Scenes Stories: Hear thrilling anecdotes, like the mysterious disappearance of a Disney Vacation Club billboard and a rebellious film crew at Disneyland, showcasing the creative energy and dedication that define Disney. Of Mouse and Men: Learn about Bob and Rick's upcoming presentation filled with entertaining stories and profound insights on Disney operations. Make sure to take a listen for more on why details matter and other disney stories. By the end you will understand the relentless pursuit, mentorship, and the meticulous attention to detail that makes Disney such a magical experience for everyone.
Send us a Text Message.We're back with our 3rd installment of silly stories from Florida! We're covering the Wakulla Volcano and the lives of John Knight, Bennie Wint, Byrd Billings, and Bob Allen.Like the show on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/OurWeirdWorldPod/Follow John on Twitter and Instagram @TheJohnHinsonFollow the show on Instagram @OurWeirdWorldPodWant more John? Everyone wants more John. Visit www.johnhinsonwrites.com for all the books, podcasts, waterfalls, and more!
Natalie talks to Bob Allen, an osteopath who specialises in treating people with disabilities and older adults. Bob shares his personal journey of transitioning from a career in IT to becoming an osteopath after his son was born with cerebral palsy. He also talks about the challenges of navigating the healthcare system for chronic conditions and the lack of support for people with disabilities. It's a conversation about the power of communication, the impact of stress on the body, and the importance of being an advocate for one's own health. Bob also shares his experience of running health and fitness courses for people with disabilities and his commitment to making a difference in the lives of their clients. KEY TAKEAWAYS Confidence in oneself and the willingness to take on new challenges can lead to personal and professional growth. It is important to understand the root cause of a problem and not just focus on treating the symptoms. The healthcare system, particularly the NHS, may not always provide the best support for chronic or long-term conditions. Being proactive and advocating for one's own health can lead to better outcomes and access to necessary treatments. Virtual reality therapy is an emerging field that has the potential to enhance traditional therapies and improve patient outcomes. BEST MOMENTS "I think the biggest problem the NHS, it's very good around treating conditions, rather than preventing those conditions in the first place." "It's about not worrying if it doesn't work... If that doesn't work, I'll find another way to do it." "You can't hack certain things. The only thing that gets results is consistency." "I think we're in a society which is very much a quick fix... I want to do it tomorrow. I want a hack that's going to show me how to do that." VALUABLE RESOURCES FB https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100044654653306 LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/sollushealthcare/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/confidententrepreneurscollective http://www.nataliearabella.com/club Consultation Call Booking - https://calendly.com/natalie-arabella-bailey/confidencecollective With a background in applied biology and 20 years of experience in IT, Bob Allen's life took a turn when his son was born with cerebral palsy. This led him to explore alternative treatments and he became an osteopath, specializing in treating people with disabilities and older adults. Bob is passionate about filling the gap in healthcare for chronic conditions and providing education and tools to empower his clients. He believes in the power of prevention and the importance of understanding the why behind each individual's health journey. ABOUT THE HOST Natalie Bailey, a Property Developer, Coach, and Mentor, boasts a decade of business acumen, from Bars to Gyms and eCommerce. Now partnered with her mother, Paula, in property development, she empowers others to find confidence and success in health, wealth, and happiness. Her Better Together initiative combats loneliness, aiding entrepreneurs through the Confident Entrepreneurs Club, Mastermind groups, and Retreats. Bridging Mallorca and London, Natalie embodies her teachings. Fitness, wealth, and happiness intertwine in her holistic approach. Dive deeper at www.nataliearabella.com for coaching plans and more info. CONTACT US FACEBOOK- https://www.facebook.com/nataliearabellabailey LinkedIn- https://www.linkedin.com/in/nataliegoldstarbep/ Instagram- https://www.instagram.com/nataliearabellabailey/ Clubhouse- https://www.clubhouse.com/@nataliearabella TikTok- https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliearabellab Email - team@nataliearabella.com
With Bill on vacation, Mike welcomes walking baseball encyclopedia Steven Goldman (@gostevengoldman) in for a chat. They talk about Steve's podcast, The Infinite Inning, returning to a weekly format, what makes a great baseball story, the worst teams in history and, of course, Casey Stengel. Steve also plays Yankees roullette with some fun names from the past. Plus, happy birthday to Blix Donnelly! And farewell to Bob Allen and Ken MacKenzie.
Welcome back to another #episode of the Trees & Lines #podcast. On this episode, we welcome back Bob Allen, #Manager of #VegetationManagement for Eversource New Hampshire, to talk about his work helping create and manage #Utility #Arboretums and how #arborist are honoring and remembering our #veterans. Have a listen, hope you enjoy.#arboretum #arboriculture #forester #forestry #utilities
Welcome to another #podcast #episode of Trees & Lines! In this episode, we talk with Bob Allen, #Manager of #VegetationManagement for Eversource New Hampshire, about how he keeps #regulators informed and works with them to request the proper #funding for their needs, new #insect #species that are affecting the #trees and causing issues for #utilities, and their #outreach #programs to inform the general #public about the #industry. Have a listen, hope you enjoy!#forester #arborist #vegmanagement #infestation
Dave Kranz creator of the WeFishASA podcast would like you to listen to this week's episode. First I interviewed Dan Johnston and we talked about ice fishing safety and the items you should have with you. Bob Allen children's books author tells us about the 5 books he has out and the 6th one coming out. Then Author, guide, writer, seminar speaker and teacher Spence Petros talks about being in the outdoors industry for 50 plus years!Thanks to Joe Bucher for the music in the podcast!
Bob Allen has been in Christian radio and TV in different roles with ministries such as those led by John Maxwell, John Piper, Michael Youssef, Tony Evans and others. Prior to his involvement in Christian media, Bob was molested as a young man. In this broadcast Bob shares his story, including how God healed him.
Today we're diving into the strategies of successful negotiation. Join Kris and real estate legend - Bob Allen - to learn the 5 winning tactics that will have you making and keeping more money in every single property you transact.
There's never been a better time to know how to buy real estate with no money out of pocket. Creative financing is a hot topic in our current economy, and no better expert then our friend - Bob Allen - to show us how it's done. Join Kris and Bob as they go deep on how to get deals done, no matter what.
Mother Nature has really made our featured guest a happy man! He is Brian “Bro” Brosdahl and Ms. Nature has given Bro his first taste of ice for the season. Bro is one of the only people we know who will say that he actually prefers ice fishing to open-water fishing. If you are from a place that doesn't see any ice, listening to Bro will make you want to jump in the car and head north right away! Bro is the best ice fisherman around and is incredible at passing along his wealth of knowledge and information to the public. Bro wants to get the whole world to get out on the ice. Please give him a listen!Bob Allen, noted author of children's outdoor books, has a new one out just in time for the holidays! “Walter: Under the Ice” will be prized by any child lucky enough to find it in their stocking. Listen to Bob talk about the book.Dan Johnston from St. Croix joins us to talk about the many substantial changes in gear and equipment that have taken place over the years. It's mind blowing to think about all that has occurred.
Muskie fly fishing guide Brad Bohen talks about fishing conditions on northern Wisconsin rivers and invites listeners to the 6th annual Muskie Ball, Nov. 5 at the Tony Area Event Center in downtown Tony, Wisconsin. Proceeds will help Ukrainian refugees. (facebook.com/AftonAngler/) Children's book author Bob Allen talks about his two latest books, Monica the Muskie and Battle of the Bass. (boballenauthor.com) In the Madison Outdoors Report, Pappas Trading Post archery guru JC Chamberlin reports on a successful youth hunt with his daughter and says archers are seeing and shooting some nice bucks. (pappastradingpost.com)
Dr. Finance Live Podcast Episode 82 - Robert G. Allen Interview - Multiple Streams of Income AuthorThis is Episode 82 of the Dr. Finance® Live Podcast hosted by Dr. Anthony M. Criniti IV (aka “Dr. Finance®”). Dr. Criniti interviewed Robert G. Allen, financial educator, 2X #1 New York Times bestselling author, real estate expert, mentor, and international keynote speaker. Robert G. Allen is an author and mentor beloved for his down-to-earth style and highly effective systems. His purpose in life is to help you achieve your dreams. He's been teaching and writing towards that purpose for forty years. His first book, the colossal #1 New York Times bestseller, Nothing Down: How to Buy Real Estate with Little or No Money Down, is the largest selling real estate investment book in history, and established Bob Allen as one of the most influential investment advisors of all time. Nothing Down stayed on the New York Times bestseller list for a whopping 54 weeks. In his following bestsellers, Creating Wealth and The Challenge, he expanded on his highly profitable real estate techniques and philosophy. Bob Allen's massive bestseller Multiple Streams of Income coined the phrase and introduced the income-earning philosophy that has become the dominant theme of the new millennium--preached by countless thought leaders, authority marketers, and entrepreneurs. Bob's new #1 bestseller The Four Maps of Happy Successful People teaches a powerful-yet-simple system to get unstuck, stay on target, and reach your ideal lifestyle. Robert Allen is a popular television, radio, and podcast guest, and has appeared on every major television network. His books have over four million copies in print.Dr. Anthony M. Criniti IV (aka “Dr. Finance®”) is the world's leading financial scientist and survivalist. A fifth generation native of Philadelphia, Dr. Criniti is a former finance professor at several universities, a former financial planner, an active investor in diverse marketplaces, an explorer, an international keynote speaker, and has traveled around the world studying various aspects of finance. He is an award winning author of three #1 international best-selling finance books: The Necessity of Finance (2013), The Most Important Lessons in Economics and Finance (2014), and The Survival of the Richest (2016). Dr. Criniti is also the host of the highly successful Dr. Finance® Live Podcast as well as one of the top hosts on Clubhouse. Dr. Criniti has started a grassroots movement that is changing the way that we think about economics and finance. For more information about Doctor Finance, please visit https://DrFinance.Info. Disclaimer: This Podcast is for informational purposes only. It is presented with the understanding that the author(s) and the publisher(s) are not engaged in providing financial, legal, or other professional services. If financial, legal, or any other form of advice is needed, please consult a financial advisor, an attorney, or another professional advice-giving entity. Also, the opinions and views expressed by any guests on this Podcast do not necessarily represent the opinions and views of Dr. Finance® or its affiliates. Copyright © 2021 to Present by Dr. Anthony M. Criniti IV - All Rights Reserved.
Rev. Bob Allen brings the message called 'In The Last Days'
Bob Allen 8-3-22 Football Club of Grace
Bob Allen 5 - 31 - 22 Football Club Of Grace
The Small Business Association of Michigan’s Small Business Weekly Podcast
On today's SBAM Weekly Podcast, Michael Rogers talks with Bob Allen, Director of Sales – Detroit for Effectv, to learn more about Comcast RISE (https://www.comcastrise.com). Businesses in Detroit, Hamtramck and Highland Park with fewer than 25 employees will have the opportunity, starting June 1, to apply for grants, marketing consultations, media placements, commercial creative services, or technology services from Effectv and Comcast Business. The Small Business Association of Michigan is the only statewide and state-based association that focuses solely on serving the needs of Michigan's small business community. We have been successfully serving small businesses like yours in all 83 counties of Michigan since 1969. We're located in Lansing, just one block from the Capitol. Our mission is to help Michigan small businesses succeed by promoting entrepreneurship, leveraging buying power and engaging in political advocacy. When small businesses band together through the Small Business Association of Michigan, they achieve more than they could on their own. Our 30.000+ members are as diverse as Michigan's economy. From accountants to appliance stores, manufacturers to medical, and restaurants to retailers, what unites the SBAM membership is the spirit of entrepreneurship…a spirit that drove you to start and continue to operate your own business because you believe you can do something better than anyone else is doing it! (music licensed from www.jukedeck.com)
Bob Allen’s nighttime routine concludes with confirming his handgun, flashlight, and cell phone are within reach on his nightstand. As a 35-year veteran of the Nashville Police Department and 21-year SWAT team instructor, Bob is a seasoned trainer of firearms and defensive tactics. As director of training at Royal Range USA he is passionate about teaching others how to protect themselves for any potential life-threatening situation. Royal Range is the premiere firearms facility in the nation offering top of the line training, products, education and services in their all-inclusive 40,000 square foot premises. Bob will tell you which firearm to buy, how to use it, and where to store it in case you find yourself in a life or death situation. TAKEAWAYS Attendees learn about gun safety and shoot at targets in Royal Range’s new shooter class Learn excellent tactical steps of what to do if an intruder is in your home Where to store your firearm for easy access but also out-of-reach for children The best weapon to get for self defense
Welcome to another season of your favourite podcast! We are starting off the season by exploring the many explanations of The Industrial Revolution with economic historian and writer Davis Kedrosky. You can learn more about Davis' work from his excellent newsletter here. You can also listen to this podcast through all the other options here. The transcript of the conversation is below.TRANSCRIPTTobi; So briefly, what is the Industrial Revolution? And what is its significance? I mean, we've all seen the charts, you see these different trend lines charting world living standards from the Middle Ages, and then somewhere in the middle 18th century, there's this huge jump, you know, that is generally termed as around the time the Industrial Revolution started. So what's the Industrial Revolution, basically? And why is it significant? Davis; Right. So I guess what you've asked here is two impossibly three questions. So what is the Industrial Revolution? The Industrial Revolution is actually multiple events, which is the bad historian answer. But essentially, you first have the British Industrial Revolution. This is a period that starts around 1760 and continues for about a century until 1860. That's sort of the standard periodization and basically consists of the structural transformation of one economy, the British economy, from a largely agrarian country to one based on manufacturing, especially in a couple of key sectors, those being textiles, iron, and various types of steam goods. So this event is transformative in a number of ways. It's not transformative, in that it brings about a titanic increase in living standards. Because really, for most of the period, living standards in Britain do not rise. It's significant because it is really the first true stirring of economic dynamism anywhere in the world, with the possible exception of the Netherlands in the 17th century. But in this case, in Britain, the industrial revolution is truly sustained. And that brings us to the second part of the question, what is the Industrial Revolution? Because there's first the British Industrial Revolution, and then a European and then a Global Industrial Revolution. By the middle of the 19th century, the technologies that sustain the British Industrial Revolution are spreading to the European continent, and Britain's rivals - France, Germany, parts of Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe and southern Europe - are all starting to take part. And this becomes a continental phenomenon. And this is occurring toward the middle and the latter half of the 19th century, eventually spreading to North America, and is based on new technologies. Primarily based on the application of science to the growth process. And this growth, unlike, perhaps the British industrial revolution, and certainly unlike any growth episode in world history was sustained. Because we are where we are today. It was the beginning of modern economic growth. And so that actually gets into why this episode is significant because it is the spontaneous transformation of a largely stagnant, slow-growing economy, perhaps less so in Britain, but certainly the case in Europe and the rest of the world until something that increasingly approach the relatively rapid pace that we're seeing today, and learn to apply technological advances in a consistent fashion to the improvement of human welfare.Tobi; I'm curious, yeah, like you said, the data is usually put somewhere around 1760, to about 1860, for the first Industrial Revolution. Why did it happen when it did? Because usually, you get two sides of this story, where some scholars will argue it was a really long, slow buildup; while you get the impression from some other scholars that was a sudden discontinuity from a previous, longer trend. So why that period in time, what was different?Davis; If I said that I believe that the Industrial Revolution was a discontinuity from a long trend, I would have historians barking at my door for the next year, and I, you know, might not ever have a career in this discipline. But what I will say is that there are a number of theories about why the industrial revolution happened and how it happens. And this paints me as a historian, but I think it's sort of irresponsible to settle on one. So I borrow from all of them. But I'll just, you know, for the benefit of the listener, I will lay out as many as I can, that I think are relevant. So I guess in the classic phase of the debate, starting in the 19th century when people realize starting with people like Karl Marx... realized that the changes that had been occurring over the previous century in the economy of Britain had been of truly historic magnitude. Two competing theories for why the industrial revolution happens: and I'm borrowing from Deirdre McCloskey here - the conservative approach, which is to say, basically capitalists saved, they were frugal, they built up a larger capital stock, and eventually learned to make whatever gains and growth that they were achieving self-perpetuating. And of course, more capital per person means more productivity, more productivity means greater income per head. So that's the conservative interpretation. The Socialist interpretation is that of Marx, which is that the industrial revolution is based on expropriation, that a process of force was involved in first, the primitive accumulation of capital by capitalists and by capitalist farmers; in dispossessing the peasantry from the countryside and driving them into the factories where they could serve as low wage labour. This increase the profits of the capitalists, and in turn created the self-perpetuating growth process that we are observing continuing today. Both of those continue to be influential, and certainly, their strains have been incorporated into the modern economic history discourse. But so far as we're concerned in talking about economic history, I think that there are really three main theories. And so one of them is definitely the slow growth over time take. And that's the unified growth theory of people like Oded Galor and David Weil, and they essentially argue that an evolutionary process occurs over time whereby a combination of selection and population growth leads to the accumulation of technologies, increase in the rate of innovation. And then this innovation in turn leads to economic growth. And that is also abetted by fertility transition, such that population growth is no longer correlated with economic growth. And that leads to a growth in income per head. Then we have... I think it's about the same year - the end of the first decade of this millennium, we had two theories that have really transformed economic history come out that really set the terms for the causes of the Industrial Revolution debate.The one that's been, I think, most influential among economists is that of Bob Allen. And in his book, The British Industrial Revolution and Global Perspective, he argues that Britain had a unique combination of factor prices - that wages were extremely high in Britain, and capital and energy were extremely cheap. And so what this led producers to do was to substitute labour for capital and also make innovations that would have this labour-saving effect by using lots of capital and energy. The prime example is the steam engine, which used cheap British coal to perform the work that would otherwise have been performed by muscle power. And so the continual creation of these labour-saving inventions is sort of the basis for the Industrial Revolution and increases worker productivity. This is the Allen theory. The Allen theory has received some very strong critiques. People like Jane Humphries and Judy Stevenson have really attacked the empirical basis of Allen's work. They've suggested that wages in Britain were not nearly as high as Allen had computed and that his series made some improper assumptions that led it to be inflated and this really changed the sorts of profits to technological innovation that Allen had to suppose would be driving this process. And so that's where the Allen theory stands today. It's sort of the cleanest mechanism for describing the industrial revolution in an economic sense, but it faces some factual challenges. The other one that occurred about the same time is that of Joel Mokyr. He wrote a book called The Enlightened Economy, I believe in 2009, in which he argued that it was rather ideas rather than economic incentives that led to the transformation of Britain. That it was industrial enlightenment that occurred, and a culture of improvement that swept Britain and led many people of the intellectual class of the country to start taking an interest in practical matters, devising innovations that would improve society, that would make doing practical tasks easier, and then crucially, sharing them with the people around them in a sort of Republic of Letters - in which intellectuals across England and across the continent all communicated to iterate upon each other's technical ideas. And this, in turn, provided the creative spark for modern economic growth and crucially incorporates the sort of scientific aspects that is the foundation of the second or European Industrial Revolution. These are the two main competing theories and people like Nicholas Crafts have attempted to synthesize them into a single argument suggesting that, you know, one explains the demand and one explains the supply of inventions. But others hold that they're incompatible. But you can kind of pick and choose your favourite aspects as Crafts did.Tobi; Yeah, I mean, I get that. But from a global perspective, you're looking at other parts of the world like India, Africa. There are other - I'd say, maybe within the economic history profession - not so popular, but quite popular with the lay public. For example, the institutionalist view of Acemoglu and Robinson who claim in their book and also in some of their papers that the Glorious Revolution laid the foundation for the Industrial Revolution. That's one, I'll like you to address some critiques of that. And secondly, what's the difference between Galor's Unified Growth Theory and sort of the Neo Malthusian story that people like Gregory Clark are constructing?Davis; Okay, I'll start with the Acemoglu and Robinson theory about the Glorious Revolution. So [what] they essentially argue is that the Glorious Revolution is a watershed event that turns England into a participatory democracy, in which people are free to possess, transfer and use private property without fear of expropriation from the supposedly tyrannical monarchy that existed beforehand. And in the institutionalist view, the security of property rights and participatory democracy are both crucial for economic growth because they allow people to transfer assets to their most productive uses. And these sort of efficiency gains also lead to investment and modern economic growth is supposed to follow from that. Yeah, so Acemoglu and Robinson are sorts of making a distinction between inclusive and extractive institutions. Extractive institutions are supposed to be the sort of, European and broadly global pattern whereby elites have no incentive to promote economic growth and do not allow participation by the common citizen in the political discourse. Whereas inclusive institutions are very much the exception but are established in Britain in the sense that I've previously described, in both the economic and political spheres.They allege that, and I quote, "the industrial revolution started and made its biggest strides in England because of her uniquely inclusive economic institutions. These, in turn, were built on the foundations laid by the inclusive political institutions brought about by the Glorious Revolution, and that they gave man of talent and vision such as James Watt, the opportunity and incentive to develop their skills and ideas and influence the system in ways that benefited them and the nation". So yeah, that's the Acemoglu and Robinson view. Um... I'm not so fond of this one. Tobi; Why? Davis; I have to be careful because there are many people who see a sort of, attack on Acemoglu and Robinson, or even a critique of Acemoglu and Robinson as a critique of institutionalism itself, and I am by no means an anti institutionalist. Because I mean, it's painfully obvious that institutions are extremely important in explaining differential development. But some empirical flaws with the Acemoglu and Robinson contention, especially in its "Why Nations Fail" iteration is that the Glorious Revolution really didn't actually bring about the sort of sweeping political changes that they suppose occurred. British Parliament was still corrupt, the electorate was tiny and dominated by landed elites rather than merchants. Certainly, industrialists come [in the] early part of the 18th century. So those sorts of sweeping changes couldn't really have had a very big influence on the beginning of Britain's economic transformation. Second of all, Parliaments just do not guarantee economic growth anyway, there are plenty of examples of Parliaments filled with wealth holders and merchants who use their political powers in order to just extract rents from the economy at large. So this happens in places like Poland, for example, where parliament is so strong that the ruler cannot issue any legislation without its consent. But that power is then used by the Polish parliament to support the feudal rights of landowners over their serfs and that leads to agricultural stagnation rather than economic growth. So parliament is not necessarily the keystone of economic transformation. Finally, private property in England was already quite secure by the time of the Glorious Revolution. And that event did not bring about any kind of radical transformation in the way that property was treated in England. The Bill of Rights that was passed in 1689 did not impose any limits on Parliament's ability to confiscate property. So you basically see the replacement of the monarch's despotic power over property such as it existed, which was in curtailed form by Parliament. So it's not clear to me that you can attach an economic discontinuity to a political discontinuity in this way. I mean, indeed, in the century following the Glorious Revolution, there really isn't an economic discontinuity. There is perhaps an acceleration in the rate at which the British population is moving out of agriculture, but that had been occurring for over a century in Britain. Those are some of the main difficulties with the Acemoglu and Robinson theory. Then I believe you asked about...um...Tobi; Yeah, Greg Clark and...Davis; Right. So this is not an area that I've really worked with very much. And by the way, there are a number of iterations on the Unified Growth Theory. But as best as I understand it, unified growth theory is concerned with the sort of, the transition between a Malthusian regime and a post-Malthusian regime through the lens of the demographic transition and the returns to innovation. And in their model, population growth tends to increase the rate of technological progress, and technological progress, in turn, increases the returns to investing in human capital. And there's sort of a positive feedback loop between investment in human capital and the rate of technological growth, which has the additional effect of decreasing fertility and a sort of quality versus quantity trade-off. Clark's hypothesis is a little bit different. So Clarke, as I recall, argues most famously in the Farewell to Arms, sorry, A Farewell to Alms. (That is quite a slip there). His argument there is that, basically, the differential reproductive rates of the wealthy lead people of their habits and mindset to become the dominant subset of the population in certain advanced regions, and their behaviour - the behaviour that made them wealthy - is sort of the basis for growth-inducing economic interaction. Those are the main differences. I guess they don't interact with one another that directly, in my point of view.Tobi; So I mean, as long as we are interrogating several theories of the causes of the Industrial Revolution, I read McCloskey's trilogy, right? And I mean, she spent a lot of time criticizing all these other theories about the causes of the Great Enrichment, as she called it. And at the end of the day, she basically, well, I'm not an expert, but in my opinion, she resorted to a bit of a sleight of hand as well, which is to say that well, the cause of this Great Enrichment is liberalism. The spread of freedom, and basically attributed that to luck. Do you buy that? And how does that differ from say, Acemoglu and Robinson, you know... Feels a bit arbitrary.Davis; As I understand it, liberalism is only a part of the McCloskey hypothesis. There's also an aspect to which it has to do with the spread of the bourgeois virtues among the people of Britain and an economic mentality that had not previously existed, and that these sorts of behaviours are the key to an efficiently transacting and innovating culture. Yeah, so there's not just liberalism uber alles. But as far as liberalism is concerned, it's clearly not a sufficient condition for economic growth, it has to be combined to be even beneficial with certain kinds of state capacity such as the provision of some kinds of basic essential services, especially infrastructure, and the provision of social overhead capital in order for the benefits of industrialization not to be winnowed away. I mean, a good example is Britain, in fact, where certain kinds of laissez-faire behaviour by the state are actually detrimental to the British economy. British cities grow much too fast for their infrastructure, and in many ways, they really are the sort of hives of scum, filth, and overcrowding they're drawn up as in your standard Charles Dickens novel. And part of the reason for that is because much of the investment in public infrastructure was shunted away from the state and toward private individuals and this process did not occur as seamlessly as it might have. And so, you know, there's poor sanitation, improper access to good drinking water, inadequate housing stocks, and all these social bads, actually, probably, reduced the rate of economic growth. So if liberalism is to be helpful, it has to be an appendage of a larger growth process. And I really do not think it's either sufficient or necessary for industrialization. You can look straight to one of the foremost industrializing countries of the last four decades in China, where industrialization has occurred apace in, really, the absence of political liberalism. And you can make arguments about whether that growth will be sustained. But there is certainly dynamism and there is certainly an improvement in per capita living standards and convergence with the West. You can even make the argument for Soviet Russia and its early years as Bob Allen has - that from about the late 1920s until 1970, Soviet Russia under a planning regime grew quickly enough to have some measure of convergence with the West, and certainly an increase in living standards.Tobi; Two final questions before I let you go. One of which would be, as you mentioned in the introduction, after the 1760 or thereabout event, a lot of economies in Europe, France, and of course, Germany, caught up with the British economy and, of course, by the end of the Second World War, America had become the preeminent global economic power. Why did the British economy decline?Davis; That's a question that some economic historians don't accept at all, and that I'm hoping to explore in the relatively near future. But the old Edwardian argument that Britain has just matured, and that it's had its spell as the leading industrial nation, but there are inevitable limits to growth, and that they've reached the limit of their possibilities and handed over the torch to the United States and to Britain's European rivals. You know, the answer here is obviously a little bit more complicated. But one of the standard responses is to say, well, the kind of growth that Britain experienced from 1760 to 1860, was of a fundamentally different character than that that made the United States and Western Central Europe successful during the 19th century. And that's basically down to this distinction between tinkering and engineering-based innovation that is responsible for the creation of many of the main inventions of the British Industrial Revolution and the application of science to technology, drives innovation during the Second Industrial Revolution. So in the first industrial revolution, you see, particularly in the textile sector, a range of innovations arising from learning by doing, from people within the industry solving problems that occur to them in the production process and making incremental improvements, really, without the aid of any kind of formal knowledge. Not all of these improvements are incremental, like inventions like the flying shuttle, the water frame, the spinning jenny, all these things bring about colossal improvements in productivity, and they make Britain by 1850 the world's leading textile exporter, but none of them required deep formal knowledge of how to construct machinery of the physics of the engineering process. Whereas by the end of the 19th century, some of the leading sectors like steel, electricity, the construction of automobiles, chemicals, all of these industries require significant scientific knowledge in order to advance to an appreciable degree. So there's the argument that Britain's success in tinkering-based innovation-led it to undervalue the importance of investment in human capital, specifically through an education system. And consequently, there was sort of an inadequate generation of young scientists and professional engineers coming through the ranks just at the time when they were most needed in transitioning the British economy toward the modern industries that we're taking hold in Germany and the United States. That's probably true to an extent. But there's also a degree to which Britain is simply following its comparative advantage in other kinds of industries in the face of the industrialization of the United States and the Central European powers. Britain is always going to have an advantage in the provision of financial services and shipping, and that is really one of the directions that the British economy takes in the years before World War One. And so the economic historian Simon Carly has argued that this isn't senescence, this is not the ageing and stagnation of the British economy, but really a movement in a new direction to conform with her resource possibilities and comparative advantages. Obviously, the United States is always going to have a much larger advantage in heavy resource-based industrialization, because of the massive reserves of ores, minerals, timber at its disposal.Tobi; Final question before I let you go, if we look at contemporary economic growth and policies, especially in countries that are still behind income-wise, what can we learn from the Industrial Revolution? Because a lot of people project different things depending on the causal story that they buy, or that they want to believe. Advocates of industrialization and the East Asian style of industrial policy take different lessons, people who favour the Institutionalists also use that to give their own sort of policy advice. People who favour liberalism will say, well, it's about political freedom. So what are we supposed to learn from the Industrial Revolution, so to speak, does that particular period of history have anything to teach us at all?Davis; You and every sort of public, economic intellectual in every country that has tried to develop ever since the Industrial Revolution wonders the same thing. And the thing that's really interesting and unique about the British Industrial Revolution is not just that it's the first of its kind, but that it's the only Industrial Revolution that occurs without a model. Because every other industrialization process in history looked back on the British experience, and said, you know, we should imitate this aspect and that aspect. And that where Britain has been successful, we should expect to be successful too. They've taken Britain's successes and applied them to their own, to some extent. The British Industrial Revolution is unique because there is no precedent, there is no model for what occurred. It really did happen spontaneously, because even though there may have been some elements in the British government that wanted to promote economic growth, that's the famous mercantilism of the 17th and 18th centuries and really, one of the reasons why Adam Smith writes his great book, The Wealth of Nations in 1776, is because these are all people interested in making the country wealthier. But they had no idea that industrialization was sort of what could or would follow. And so, in terms of the lessons that we can draw from this, they are to some extent limited. We know that because of the degree to which all of these countries that have attempted to follow the British model have either successfully or unsuccessfully failed to do so. The United States, for example, was moderately successful at industrializing, say, in New England, along British lines, but immensely successful in going its own way in a variety of Heavy Industries toward the end of the 19th century. Partly because of the simple scale, but also because of the human capital and skill advantages that we've been talking about. You know, it's quite reasonable to argue that many of the East Asian countries would have struggled to industrialize in the spontaneous fashion that Britain did because they were situated in a position in the global economy in which they did not have a comparative advantage in the industries that would end up transforming them until they employed industrial policy in order to break free and to get out of low level local agrarian traps. And I know that people will shout at me and say that Meiji Japan was already growing prior to the world wars. But I don't think it was necessarily true that Meiji Japan was set to grow in the spectacular fashion that Japan did after 1945. But all this is debatable. But what is certainly true from the British example, is that it demonstrates, in some respects, the extent to which a different combination of political liberalism and state capacity can make a difference in producing some economic separation. So if you have the right political economy, by comparison with your neighbours, you can have a bit of a growth advantage. This is not to say that if you have had Britain's political economy from the 18th century, you would somehow grow faster today. Rather, if you had Britain's advantage in political economy, you might have. But in my opinion, and this is not to sound too down, the genesis of the Industrial Revolution is primarily in the long process of the transformation of productive forces from the 16th century onward. And no hand was taken really by any institution in shaping them. And that spontaneity, and that mystery really, is what makes the Industrial Revolution so interesting. And so also just why it has been so difficult to copy. And why nations that have intentionally industrialized have needed to find their own recipes for doing so.Tobi; Finally, what are you working on right now? And why are you excited about it?Davis; Yeah, so I'm planning on obviously continuing with my Substack and blog, I never really know what to call it. I don't know if it's a newsletter or a blog, or what? I guess it just depends on...Tobi; I think it's both. Davis; Yeah, I guess it depends on how you access it. But yeah, I've got a couple of projects in various stages of production. I have an economic history paper that is presumably being refereed at the moment, so we'll see how that's received and whether major transformations will be needed to bring that toward publication. And then I also am in some of the very early stages of what could be an exciting project in Canadian economic history. But I don't want to reveal too much about that at the present. I'm not exactly like throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping that it sticks because I have way too much time in order to, sort of, incentivise desperation like that.But I do think it's, at this point, beneficial to engage in a diverse array of possibilities for work that I can consider doing.Tobi; It's been great talking to you, Davis, and I wish you all the best.Davis; Yeah, thanks. Fun conversation. This is a public episode. Get access to private episodes at www.ideasuntrapped.com/subscribe
A MILLION DOLLARS!!! That is what 23-year old Logan Parks and 20-year old Tucker Smith won at the Johnny Morris Bass Pro Shops U.S. Open National Bass Fishing Amateur Team Championships. Parks and Smith, fishing buddies and Auburn University students from Shoal Creek, Alabama, not only won the $1 million first-place prize, but also a pair of Toyota Tundra trucks and a pair of 21-foot bass boats with motors. Parks and Smith join us to talk about how they won the most lucrative amateur fishing tournament of all time on Missouri's Table Rock Lake.Dan Johnston from St. Croix joins Dave to talk about whether or not, the term “Made in America,” means anything anymore.Just in time to get the kids some quality reading material for Christmas, Noted children's author, Bob Allen joins us to talk about his wonderful books.
UW-La Crosse Planetarium director Bob Allen joined in studio to talk about all things out of this world. A cube-like structure found on the moon, an asteroid buzzing the tower that is Earth, billionaires headed to space and more. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A recently completed project has recommended changes to the Austroads Guide to Road Tunnels Part 2: Planning, Design and Commissioning to provide guidance on rationalising road signs on the approaches to tunnels, to divert over-height and dangerous goods vehicles that approach tunnel entrances. When these vehicles attempt to pass through tunnels that have not been designed to cater for them, this can cause significant damage to the infrastructure, massive traffic congestion and, in some unfortunate circumstances, injury or loss of life of the motorists. As such, it is highly advantageous to divert these vehicles away from tunnels wherever possible to reduce these negative impacts. This webinar, presented by Bob Allen, Marcus van der Velden, Lindsay Edmonds and Charmaine Joe, covers the following: Project methodology and key findings of the review Current signage practices review and gap analysis Proposed signage scheme Human factors considerations.
Please Subscribe For More Episodes! iTunes: https://apple.co/30g6ALF Spotify: https://odaatchat.libsyn.com/spotify Stitcher: https://bit.ly/3n0taNQ YouTube Channel: https://bit.ly/2UpR5Lo If you're not already, please follow the podcast on instagram to see behind the scenes clips, upcoming guests, and we are now doing IG Lives with our new inhouse writer, Jennifer MacArthur. You can find it by searching for: @odaatpodcast Today I'll be interviewing my most favorite person in the world…my husband! I met him shortly after I got sober in 94 and besides getting sober, he's the best thing that's happened to me. Bob just celebrated 33 years of continuous sobriety. I love his recovery story and I'm so excited to share it with you! So with that, please enjoy this episode, with Bob. Be sure to follow me on Instagram for daily inspiration: @odaatpodcast and @arlinaallen
Season 2, Episode 45 - Top 3 Disney Dinners! Top 3 Disney Dinners! Hey everyone, I'm Mike, she's Sophie, and that's Brenda, and we're On the Road with Mickey! This is Season 2, Episode 45 for November 8, 2021, and our feature topic is our Top 3 Disney Dinners! This is the second of a mini series of dining episodes, and we think you'll enjoy them! Have a listen, and let us know in the comments what you think! Now, here's the rundown of what we talked about: Updates from Last WeekA couple of weeks ago we were talking about Brenda's friend Susan and her love for Tigger. What I forgot to do last week was share some pictures of her collection. Here we go, enjoy!I did check out the Friar's Nook, and it does appear that it has regular hours for breakfast!Lastly, we are counting down the episodes! We are 5 episodes away from celebrating our 100th Episode of On the Road with Mickey! We're knee deep in preparing for that celebration, so stay tuned!Cheddar from the Big CheeseBrenda: We shared a photo in the Facebook Group from the Magic Kingdom -- on November 1st, the Christmas Tree and decorations went up!Mike: Mickey Mouse is back for Meet and Greets at the Magic Kingdom, as well as the Disney Princesses at Princess Fairytale Hall!Sophie: Coming to Disney+ November 19th -- “Adventure Thru the Walt Disney Archives” -- Check out this teaser video and thanks Sheila for sharing it with us! https://www.instagram.com/p/CVObpHGBKW-/Connect with us! Here's how: Facebook: https://facebook.ontheroadwithmickey.comFacebook Group: https://facebookgroup.ontheroadwithmickey.comYouTube: On the Road with Mickey (Don't forget to subscribe, like the videos, and comment!)Instagram: On the Road with MickeyEmail: info@ontheroadwithmickey.comPhone Voicemail: 919-799-8390Feature Topic: Top 3 Disney Dinners!Sophie's top 31) 50's Prime Time2) Garden Grill3) Cookes of DublinMike's top 31) Liberty Tree Tavern2) Via Napoli3) Garden GrillBrenda's top 31) Via Napoli2) Raglan Road3) ‘OhanaThis Day in Disney History for November 81987 - Bob Allen, 1994 - Walt Disney RecordsDisney Who's Who CharacterScamp from Lady and the TrampA little bit of Walt“I can never stand still. I must explore and experiment. I am never satisfied with my work. I resent the limitations of my own imagination.”- Walt DisneyComing next week: Top 3 Disney SandwichesSponsorshipOn the Road with Mickey is sponsored by Pixie Vacations by Mike Ellis, Tech Solutions NC, and Brenda Plans.
Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for October 1, 2021 is: vestige • VESS-tij • noun A vestige is a trace, mark, or visible sign left by something lost or vanished. // The seconds ticked by, but the team still had a vestige of hope. // The ruins remain as vestiges of the Roman occupation of Britain. See the entry > Examples: "We see this galaxy as it was, not as it is today. It is theoretically possible the galaxy no longer exists but the light will continue toward Earth through the vacuum of space until the last vestiges reach our eyes and it disappears." — Bob Allen, The Daily Nonpareil (Council Bluffs, Iowa), 26 Aug. 2021 Did you know? Vestige traces to Latin vestigium, meaning "footstep, footprint, or track." Like its parent, it is used to refer to a perceptible sign made by something that has passed or to a tangible reminder, such as a fragment or remnant of what is past and gone.
En este episodio, tuvimos a Rick Mantel en La Autopsia. Viendo como cu carrera cambio, de ser un "Baby Face" a uno de los "Heels" mas odiado de esta industria. Tambien continuamos con las siguientes 2 luchas de Undertaker en esta linea del tiempo. Undertaker no se olvida de Ultimate Warrior, de alguna forma, él deberá pagar por ocacionar la primera derrota del Enterrador. Links para acceder a los videos: Undertaker vs Bob Allen - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fsxYSXxQT4 Undertaker vs Jim Gorman - https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x380hph Nos puedes escribir a nuestro correo electrónico - takermaniapod@gmail.com Siguenos en nuestras redes sociales: https://linktr.ee/Takermaniapodcast Arte creado por Destiny Sky: https://linktr.ee/Artsy_Alpaca Audios creados y producidos por Ramiro Delgado - https://www.instagram.com/ramirodelgadolocutor/ https://twitter.com/ramirodelgado Fotografía por JR - https://www.instagram.com/creative_outlook_photography "Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing." https://paypal.me/takermaniapod?locale.x=en_US I'm on @buymeacoffee. If you like my work, you can buy me a coffee and share your thoughts
Join Drew Lyon, Kim Garland-Campbell, and Tim Paulitz as they celebrate the accomplishments and historic contributions to the PNW Wheat Industry of the late ARS scientist Bob Allen. TRANSCRIPTION: https://smallgrains.wsu.edu/wsu-wheat-beat-episode-105/ RESOURCES MENTIONED: None for this episode. CONTACT INFORMATION: Contact Dr. Kim Garland-Campbell via email at kim.garland-campbell@usda.gov and Dr. Tim Paulitz via email at timothy.paulitz@usda.gov.
Guests Melinda and Bob Allen from Allen & Co. Environmental Services share their expertise on HVAC systems, including:How HVAC cleaning and HVAC maintenance differ, and why regular cleaning is vital to occupant healthHow HVAC cleaning affects indoor air qualityHow unexpected factors can contribute to mold growth in your HVAC systemWhether UV light is an effective treatment for COVID-19 and other viruses
Bob Allen is the founder of ABC Communications and president of the BC Broadband Assocation. Last year, he sold his company to Telus and says it makes sense Shaw would also want to be absorbed by a larger company as the internet and cellphone space becomes more expensive to compete in.
In this last episode of the year, we discuss crime and updates for 2020. Monoliths. The Vallow Family. Micah Harrington. Hazana Anderson. Evelyn Boswell. Madeleine McCann. The Zodiak Killer. Bob Allen the Oklahoma Cannibal. The Christmas Day RV Bomber.
The Wrap Up!!! 2020 what a F*** Year ▪️ Last weekends fights -Canelo Alvarez vs Callum Smith -Our thoughts on the fight -Our thoughts on Canelo's performance -Canelo out landed smith (209-97) -Our thoughts on Smith's performance What is left for Canelo to do? GGG vs Kamil Szeremeta Shakan Pitters vs Craig Richards ▪️ Fight Year let's wrap it up We started this year with (Jan) -Tank vs Gamboa -Josh taylor signed to MTK -Andy Ruiz left Manny Robles -RIP Kobe Bryant -Chris Eubank's house got robbed (Feb) -UMAR IFL UMAR was in hot water -Lou Di Bella was sacked by Wilders team -Eddie signed Josh Warrington -Wilder vs Fury which sparked globe gate water gate lol (March) CORONA VIRUS THE WORLD SHUTS DOWN (April) -RIP arroger Mayweather -BJS looses license over a madness -Scott Fitzgerald also loses license over domestics (allegedly) (May) -still in quarantine and it just got silly with zoom pressers over nonsense (OD vs Fowler
Steve says that our main guest is the best multi-species fisherman in the country. Go ahead and argue with him, he dares you! Spence Petros is a Hall of Fame angler, along with being a successful educator, radio and television guest and magazine editor. He’s done it all in the world of fishing, but most important is that he has caught an awful lot of trophy fish. His classes have been attended by Jim “Musky Hunter” Saric, John Campbell, Ted Takasaki and Mark Zona, among others. Those guys will tell you how good Spence is. Give him a listen. Dan Johnston from St. Croix talks about open water fishing coming to an end at his home in Iowa. Children’s book author, Bob Allen, introduces us to “Monica the Muskie.” A perfect Christmas gift!
It’s not really all that shocking that Bob Allen became a pilot to presidents and celebrities, when you consider that Bob is one of those people who reaches the apex of whatever he does. If there were an overachievers club, he would be the president. For example, in high school, Bob played three sports. Not only was he the starting QB for the Lee High School Football team in Springfield VA, but he was also the team captain and starting guard on the basketball team, and the team captain and shortstop for the baseball team. In his free time in high school and college, he didn’t just go bowling and play pool, he won bowling and pool tournaments.And, by his senior year at Randolph Macon college, he was starting shortstop once again, and now, scouts were paying attention to him. In fact, there’s a pretty good chance that Bob would have gone on to play in the major leagues, but, as Bob puts it, before Houston could draft him, the army did. So, instead of ending up a star in the major leagues, Lt. Colonel Bob Allen ended up having a remarkable career as an airman and a pilot. Including time as an Air Force One Pilot. Kind of ...Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/thingyoudo)
On Episode 95, Bob Allen joins the show to talk about his personal fishing, the books he's wrote, and more! Scott and Matt also discuss the National Walleye Tour Championship and the Bassmaster derby on Chickamauga!
Chris and Austin have an exciting conversation about the past, present, and future of "MobRetreats" with Bob Allen (https://twitter.com/CuriousAgilist) and Dimitry Polivaev (https://twitter.com/dimitrypolivaev). We cover how MobRetreats came to be, what MobRetreats are, the "Global Day Of MobRetreat" event on 7/18, and the Global Liquid Mob event. Video and show notes: https://youtu.be/Oq2Kb09o38I https://mobretreat.org/ https://global-liquid-mob.github.io/
Bob Allen, founder of The Allen Brothers Band, and my old bandmate and friend, joins the Keep it Wausome podcast. We talk about songwriting, how he learned to play music without being able to read music and and becoming comfortable with one's singing voice. You won't want to miss this one!
In the Hupy and Abraham Outdoor Report, outdoor writer and guide Joe Shead offers tips for how and where to find shed deer antlers now that spring has arrived. (goshedhunting.com, hupy.com) Wisconsin Conservation Congress chairman Larry Bonde explains how to provide input on the DNR Spring Fish and Wildlife Hearings questionnaire online now that public meetings have been cancelled. (dnr.wi.govl) Book author Bob Allen talks about his three books aimed at introducing the outdoors to young children. (boballenauthor.com//a>) In the Madison Outdoors Report, pro angler Duffy Kopf reports on fishing opportunities in the Madison area and discusses the new year round bass fishing regulations. Send us your comments and ideas. Call 414-297-7554 or email dsoradio@gmail.com.
Bob Allen brings us another interesting series of talks investigating different stories from the Bible at Lydney Christian Fellowship.
Bob Allen brings us another interesting series of talks investigating different stories from the Bible at Lydney Christian Fellowship.
Bob Allen brings us another interesting series of talks investigating different stories from the Bible at Lydney Christian Fellowship.
Bob Allen brings us another interesting series of talks investigating different stories from the Bible at Lydney Christian Fellowship.
This is the fifth episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
This is the first episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
This is the second episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
This is the sixth episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
This is the sixth episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
This is the third episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
This is the fourth episode from the second series of talks Bob Allen did at Lydney Christian Fellowship where he focused on the person of Jesus.
Does this guy love to fish, or what? We're not sure we've ever had a guest on with us who is always so jacked to go fishing. Open water or on the ice, Brian "Bro" Brosdahl catches them all. This interview takes us places we have never been before. We talk whitefish, tulibees, eelpout and even rock bass! WE really had a ball chatting with our friend Bro. Give it a listen, please. Children's author, Bob Allen, joins us to talk about his new book that chronicles the latest adventures of Walter the Wily Walleye. This time Walter is under the ice. Dan Johnston from St. Croix talks about the last ice of the season.
The Men behind Dynamic: Dwayne Myers, Partner Dynamic Automotive Mark Murphy, Lead Technician Todd Zimmerman, Location leader Bob Allen, VP of Operations, from wrenching to location leader Key Talking Points:Career-pathing. The leaders are there when you need them Shop owners can develop their team and really grow and make a difference in our industry The team knows there are growth opportunities within the company Concept: Train your replacement Dwayne is out of operations every day and relies on his leadership team to make decisions I took a long time for the owners of Dynamic to learn this and to learn to trust Communication is the key to making this happen Owners were thinking more internally in the past years and realized they needed to think outward to their team and community The Dynamic website tells their story. They won a top ten website honor from AutoInc Magazine Training is a strong component to the culture of Dynamic Automotive They have created a new business model ‘Dynamic Off-Road ’ They are there to discover new suppliers, products and relationships to grow this new customer offering. Resources: Thanks to Dwayne Myers, Mark Murphy, Todd Zimmerman, and Bob Allen for their contribution to the aftermarket’s premier podcast. Link to the ‘BOOKS‘ page highlighting all books discussed in the podcast library (https://remarkableresults.biz/books/) . Leaders are readers. Leave me an honest review on (https://airtable.com/tblOgQmbnkHekpl0L/viwSbPkieMNhLOmtK/recQNomCKr1D5I9x4) . Your ratings and reviews really help and I read each one of them. Love what we do, buy a cup of coffee (https://remarkableresults.biz/coffee/) . (http://eepurl.com/bhqME9) Be socially involved and in touch with the show: Speaking (https://remarkableresults.biz/speaking) Subscribe to a mobile listening app (https://remarkableresults.biz/app/) (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/carm) This episode is brought to you by AAPEX, the Automotive Aftermarket Products Expo. AAPEX represents the $740 billion global automotive aftermarket industry and has everything you need to stay ahead of the curve. With 2,500 exhibiting companies, you’ll see the latest products, parts, and technologies for your business. As a result, the event also offers advanced training for shop owners, technicians, warehouse distributors (WDs) and auto parts retailers, as well as networking opportunities to grow your business. AAPEX 2019 will take place Tuesday, Nov. 5 through Thursday, Nov. 7, at the Sands Expo in Las Vegas. Therefore, more than 48,000 targeted buyers are expected to attend, and approximately 162,000 automotive aftermarket professionals. They will be from 135 countries which are projected to be in Las Vegas during AAPEX 2019. For information, visit (http://aapexshow.com./)
Have you ever wondered what it takes to make a radio show? This week my guest is be Bob Allen and we take a look “under the hood” to see how a radio show is produced. It's a very interesting and informative look at what goes in to making a radio show.
Our nation’s suburbanization has prioritized the use of cars and highways, leading to traffic, pollution and inequity. Silicon Valley is no exception. In this episode, Vinita Goyal, Program Officer for Housing and Transportation at SVCF, talks with Bob Allen, Director of Policy and Advocacy at Urban Habitat; Gary Hsueh, Director of Mobility Programs at Prospect Silicon Valley; and Lalo Gonzales, Program Manager at the Youth Leadership Institute. Listen in as they discuss the state of transportation in the Valley and how the region can address community needs. Access the full show notes at siliconvalleycf.org
We're preparing for a big weekend, not just on the pitch at Bristol City, but back at the DW Stadium as well!For the second year running more than 100 people will sleep inside the concourse at the DW Stadium to help raise funds for our charity of the year, the Brick, who offer vital services to people who are homeless, in poverty of suffering from debt crisis.For more information please visit thebrick.org.ukWith that in mind, we invited Latics season card holder Bob Allen into the studio as he prepares to take part in the sleepout and runs the rule over recent performances on the pitch, whilst Danny Fox focuses on preparations for the first team down at Bristol City.Transporting us away from the football, Anthony Pilkington tells us exactly who he wouldn't want to be stranded with on a desert island, why golf is significantly better than fishing and the key question... will he be watching the final season of Game of Thrones.Plus, Harry Aitkenhead from official betting partner Coral brings us the latest Championship chatter. When the fun stops, stop. Please bet responsibly, begambleaware.orgIf you'd like to get involved or feature on Latics Listen, please get in touch through our social media channels on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram, or by emailing laticslisten@wiganathletic.com - your comments, questions and support are much appreciated!Listen above, stream on Spotify or download our brand new podcast for free on iTunes. We're also available on Soundcloud and Buzzsprout!
YouTube and Soft Porn? There is a YouTuber, named Matt Watson who exposed what he called a wormhole into a soft core pedophilia ring and posted this out on YouTube. In less than a week he essentially caused the cut off of advertising, some very big advertisers on YouTube. I'll tell you more about that today. You know, I've been warning you about these smart devices and today there is a real-world example of the bad guys at work and the true invasion of our private lives. The Dark Web is in the News. We'll talk about what it is, What's available. How do you access it? What you can find. We've got Windows Defender. This is something I'm talking about in my new master course over the next couple of weeks. Where I will teach how to secure your computers and secure them effectively. Do you put things off? We all do. We'll talk a little bit that and procrastination. I will tell you about an extension for Chrome that just might help you out. Facebook may not be trying to protect the rest of us, but they are trying to protect their own. Yes, indeed, Facebook is using its apps to track people. And we'll tell you why and how. Flipping Houses. Has it ever intrigued you? I know it has me. Now, Zillow is helping you get the information you need if you are interested in buying or selling properties. They have a couple of new tools that I will talk to you about. These and more tech tips, news, and updates visit - CraigPeterson.com --- Transcript: Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors. Airing date: 02/23/2019 Flipping Houses The Hitech Way - Smart TVs Chrome sticks Hacked For-Profit - Pedophile Ring Operating On YouTube Craig Peterson: 0:00 Here we go again Craig Peterson. Man we just keep pushing to that thousand week mark this is so cool. I have to thank everybody course at Clear Channel and iHeart and even before it was either one of those for putting up with me all these years and for you guys for listening right. If it wasn't for listeners there just wouldn't be a radio show and podcast. So, hey thank you very much. Of course, you can listen to me live on iHeart app. I'm not sure why they're podcasting isn't picking me up but yeah we never been able to resolve that maybe I should get somebody to work on that one as well because there was a lot of people that really enjoy it and if you want to listen to the podcast it's just http://CraigPeterson.com/iTunes and you'll find it right there. I'm also on a bunch of other ones. I'm in a SoundCloud I think I'm know I'm in TuneIn and a few of these other distribution networks out there. So have a look for it Tech Talk with Craig Peterson and don't get confused with this other guy that's been trying to steal my name and my show out in the Seattle area. No, no, no, no, it's me. I have a kind of distinctive voice. And so from that, hopefully you'll be able to figure out which one is which. Because I am the original Now, okay, moving on. Today, we've got as usual, a whole ton of stuff. Our email should be back to usual for you guys. So, this morning, Saturday morning, you should have received the weekly show notes and those show notes go through all of the articles that I think are worth covering in the news. So let's get going. We've got a YouTuber here who has cut off essentially, he has caused the cut off of advertising, some big advertisers on YouTube will tell you about that. You know, I've been warning you about these smart devices that are out there. We're going to tell you about why. Here's a real-world example of what a bad guy has been doing. And he says he's going to stop doing it now. The dark web, what is it? What can you access? How do you access it? What can you find, and we've got Windows Defender. This is something I'm talking about in the course, my master course over the next couple of weeks about how to secure your computers and secure them effectively. So we'll talk a little bit about that and procrastination. This is kind of cool. How many of us get on the computer, we open up Chrome, we start poking around on the internet. And we end up wasting a lot of time. Well here's a Chrome extension that might help you out. Facebook may not be trying to protect the rest of us, but they are trying to protect their own. Yes, indeed, Facebook is using its apps to track people. And we'll tell you why and how. And we'll start out with this one because I think this is really cool. You've probably heard of Zillow before, it's an app. It's a website. I've used it before, you know, you go into a nice neighborhood or area of the country and say, Wow, I wonder what it costs to buy a house here. So you pop up Zillow and Zillow comes up and says, hey, yeah, here's what it costs and in this town, and here's all the houses are for sale that even now tells you about rentals and rental availability. And Zillow has been keeping a very close eye on the real estate market. It's pretty much right almost all the time. It even has a tool that will estimate what a house is worth. So it'll have its little Zillow estimate. It'll let you know what the taxes are, what the was paid for that house originally kind of pulls it all together. Now, you've been watching on TV, there's, I think it's home and garden TV, HDTV. My wife loves this channel, and some of the stuff that's out on it. But they have these house flipping shows, there are these twin brothers that do one, there are these people in Waco, Texas, a husband and wife, I guess they're having marital issues. Now, I'm not sure. But this whole Magnolia thing and how popular it is, it's gotten so popular that even our target has picked up her chain of household decorations and everything, which is really kind of cool. When you get right down to it. And think about it. She has really built an empire along with her husband, I think it's mainly her. But you know, it's hard to tell, maybe it's him driving it. And she's just the voice for the most part. But she's definitely the decorator type. Well, these shows have become very popular, they are inexpensive to produce, at least for the most part. And the idea is that the host, and I only mentioned two shows there's a lot of them, but the idea is the hosts go in, they find a house maybe a distressed house somebody's about to get foreclosed on or something else is happening. But they find the house and they try and buy it at a deal. And oftentimes they are on foreclosed homes and they don't get a chance to inspect them beforehand. But they're still able to make a bunch of money. And that's how they're compensated. Of course, they get money from the show's production company. And there may be other money's involved to go between all of these different people involved. It's fairly expensive, obviously to produce a show. But, because the host can make so much money it costs a lot less to produce these shows and people love them right. I like those shows also where they go to different parts of the world. I saw when they were in Panama and they the show that couple three different properties and they have to decide which one they want to buy and sell your their guests and against your wife trying to figure out what it is right? Aren't those things kind of cool. Obviously, I'm not the only one that likes these just based on the numbers that are out there. And if you've seen them, you might have thought a little bit about maybe flipping a house. And there have been ads on this radio station that I'm on and others for seminars you can attend where they'll teach you everything you need to know about how to make money fast, and you do it in the real estate market. And you use other people's money. I took Bob Allen's course. read his book, and he and Mark Victor Hansen got together they put together this whole thing and I bought it all and I went to some of the seminars. I've been to these before. Multi-day seminars on buying houses and flipping them and things. I never did it because it wasn't something I was comfortable doing. You know what do I know, I certainly have done renovations in my own home before and I mean, done them, you know, built everything. Built the cabinets from scratch, and, and the whole nine yards. So, I know a little bit about it. But I never felt comfortable enough to go out and do it all on my own. How about you guys, right? I guess it's the same thing with computer security. Most of the people that signed up for this latest master course for me were kind of wondering, what should they do? How should they do it? They didn't even know where to start. And that's kind of where I would be. And even after attending these seminars, these live events, I didn't feel comfortable enough to go out and start flipping houses, right. Well, this is interesting when we tie in Zillow because you can use it a little in order to kind of figure out is there a house I should flip. And bottom line if you are going to be buying homes and flipping them, which means you're going to renovate them, you're going to turn them into a valuable property from whatever they are now and sell it for a higher price. And hopefully higher than what it cost you to buy it and renovate it. Right? That's what flipping is when talking about flipping a house. So hopefully, you know the neighborhood. Everybody that I've read and the seminars I've attended, say get to know a neighborhood. It might be your neighborhood. It might be a close by neighborhood but know everything, know all of the houses, what are they sold for? What are they really worth? How long have they been sitting on the market? That information can help you also get a really good deal on a house. Now, remember, I mentioned Zillow. Have you used Zillow before? Have you wondered what their model is? How do they really make money? It is obvious that they're taking somebody from the real estate agents that are are advertising in there and the leads that they're getting from Zillow. But, this is very interesting because Zillow is now getting in the house flipping business. Isn't that something. So you can now go on to Zillow. And this is cool, I even saw an ad I have it up on my website. When you look at this article that came out of Bloomberg, they have a little ad that right out of a print media about flipping your house, my you know, we want to buy your home. So people have these problems all the time where they're trying to sell their home, but they can't buy a new home until they sold the current home. And once I sold the current home, they're in real trouble now, because I got to get out of that home and 30 days or 60 days, whatever it is, which means that's all the time they have to find a new home and that just not going to work out very well for them. Been in that position before. So should I do repairs on the house before I sell it? How much repair should I do? Should I just paint the walls white, I've got to replace this floor or that flooring. I gotta fix this roof leak that's been there for a long time, right? All of these things you guys have dealt with this before. Right? And if you've ever sold a house. Well, the company that came up with this whole business thing and came up with the programs and the website. And now the apps have something called Zestimates. Z-E-S-T, Just like Zillow. Z-I-L-L-O-W. You check it out if you haven't checked out that app or website yet. But Zestimates now, and it's kind of a Kelley Blue Book for American homes. And they've started an instant offers business. The idea behind this is if you think you want to sell your home, you go on to the Zillow site and you get a Zestimate. And the whole idea behind this is Zillow has a pretty good idea of what your house might be worth. Because they're using some machine learning. They have all of this data about homes that have been sold in your neighborhood in your town, and what they're all worth. So if you sign up for this, it's part of this whole new breed of high tech home flippers. They've been called iBuyers before. There are some Silicon Valley startups that are doing this and real estate brokerages that have instant offer operations as well. So Zillow has kind of pulled this all together the information from Wall Street, and the finances and Silicon Valley capital, and all of these algorithms they've developed. And they can make very detailed and fine and correct really predictions about home prices. So, these investors are buying homes on a massive scale. And because it's such a big scale, unlike the Magnolia people we talked about before, they only have to make a just a small profit out of each flip. So that's putting these real estate investors that have been flipping homes the old fashioned way, it's putting them in a bit of a bad spot. But it's interesting because this Bloomberg article goes through a specific example in the Phoenix area. And what happened was, they listed their home, they weren't sure what to do, what to fix what not to fix, normally, what would happen, right, you'd have a real estate agent come out, they look at the house and say, Well, if you fix the bathroom, you're going to get your money out. If you do the kitchen, you're not going to get your money out. And you got to fix the roof because it's got a second roofline or whatever, all of those things are right. And then you do it and you have your fingers crossed, that you're going to be able to sell that house at some point in the future. Well, in this case, what happens is Zillow make some really good estimates based on what's happening in your neighborhood. And they now have this great opportunity because they might make a good deal on it. So they hire someone to come out at that point and look at your house. So they have an appraiser who comes out and has a quick look around, makes sure there's nothing like terrible with your house, which would lower its value on the market. And then Tada, you're done. It's just absolutely amazing. So, you know, agents in the past have really resented Zillow is market power. And they've been complaining about this whole idea behind this Zestimate and Zillow as had these estimates for a long time and saying that they're creating unrealistic expectations. But now Zillow with Zappraisal might be a way to put it has a very good business model and a very good idea of what your house is actually worth. So, keep an eye out for that if you're looking to buy a house right now today. You can go to Zillow and find out what there's Zestimate is their Zillow estimate for the value of the house. just generically speaking, assuming there are no major flaws in the home. And you can now also have Zillow buy your house from you and flip it. Now, because they only need a very small margin, you might actually do better on one of these Zillow flips. And they do charge like a six to I think it goes as high as 10%, which is higher than your normal real estate agent. But you're also guaranteed a sale and the sale is going to happen very quickly. So you know, I have to take all of that stuff into consideration when you're looking at it. Well, we're going to come back here in just a second, I want to talk about this guy called TheHackerGiraffe and why my warnings about smart TVs are coming true, what he's been doing and why he's retiring. So, here we go. So, this guy calls himself or called himself, I guess TheHackerGiraffe. And he said he's retired from hacking smart TVs. This is really, really interesting, because, you know, I've warned about this before, before, excuse me, we've had manufacturers who have installed cameras in your TV. And the idea is, the TV looks back at you. It's watching you while you're watching TV. And the idea for that type of spying on people is to try and figure out are you paying attention. Are you paying attention during the ads, when you look away, who's in the room, there's facial recognition software, some of these vendors are using, so they know oh, this, it's this person. And they always watch this type of show. It's that person, oh, we've got a whole family in here recognizes there's like, three, four or five faces and how often they're watching TV. And of course, that's a true invasion of our privacy. And there was a great article this week about Paul Vixie, a guy who I've admired for years and loosely worked with on some of the DNS stuff. I've used his code forever, you know, kind of advanced, techie geeky stuff on the internet. But he was all upset because he installed a machine that was calling home. And it was, I think it was a Google Home device. And it wasn't using his DNS and there's no way to change. And, you know, these devices we're putting in our homes, and we're using this Internet of Things, frankly, can be dangerous, and it can be spying on us and worse and can be used to find out by the bad guys when are people not home. That's the time to rob the house. Right? It's breaking and entering versus some form of assault that might happen. So people should be concerned very legitimately, I think, be concerned about all of this. And when you're talking about the smart TVs, there's, even more, this guy, TheHackerGiraffe, he hacked not just smart TVs, but he hacked these Google Chromecast streaming devices and others, and his whole idea was to promote a YouTuber that he liked. Have you heard of this guy, this PewDiePie guy, you might not have a very strange guy. Very, very strange guy. But he had a popular YouTube channel he did some things that kind of forced him out of favor and that was a problem because he started losing followers. I think in fact he got completely delisted off of YouTube and he managed to get back on. Well apparently this guy, TheHackerGiraffe and I'm looking at this article from Graham Cluley, thanks for forwarding this along it's kind of interesting just see that I don't know that he was paid I think he was paid yeah In fact he was he used Patreon in order to get paid but he was going out and hacking people's smart TV its TVs and smart TV devices and had it set up so that you turn on your TV you'd be watching a program or whatever and up would come and add to watch this PewDieGuy for his channel. There he was here's his YouTube channel click on it sort of thing it's kind of nuts when you think about it and he was doing it not just for PewDiePie he was doing for other people too. Now I have long criticized the Huffington Post because they used black techniques in order to get followers. In other words, they cheated and lied, they did a lot of things that people have accused all kinds of people on the internet for doing but you know the ends justify the means to these people. And in this case, the Huffington Post the ends justified the means we got to get our message out there. So we've got to get bigger and stronger and last year and in fact, that's exactly what they did. Well by getting bigger and stronger, and nastier they increase their base. They increase their base and then the rules changed and you could do the practice these dark arts back in the day to try and fool people into following your website but you couldn't do it anymore because they started getting clamped on people didn't like it and the FTC came after them saying this is illegal unfair etc and so they stopped doing it and it's not just the Huffington Puffington Post its many of these different websites and did it over the years. So now this guy was paid to go on to your Smart TV or Chromecast devices and hack them to get you to watch their internet channel so a lot of people were asking them, Chromecast owners Why their TV suddenly showing a video promoting this YouTube superstar PewDiePie and Chromecast owners complained to Google who looked into this and started finding out oh wait a minute now this all happened because of again incorrectly configured routers that had this you p&p enabled you might have heard of this before. It's a way for you to get out to the internet and then have the internet get back to you. But it's interesting. Just because it's misconfigured doesn't give you carte blanche access to it right. I misconfigured my WiFi Why does that somehow mean to you that you have every right to kind of break in on me? That's the question. And this guy, TheHackerGiraffe has decided he's going to retire. He posted his retirement notice online and we've seen the PewDiePie fans doing all kinds of things. Just last month, they defaced a section of the Wall Street Journal website. And of course, this TheHackerGiraffe guy and PewDiePie both claim they had no involvement in the attack. But it frankly it's interesting to look at right because we are seeing major changes in the internet and major changes in what we consider to be acceptable. So that brings us to Facebook and pedophiles. Believe it or not I'm not saying that everybody is a pedophile on new I said Facebook, but it's YouTube on YouTube. But it's kind of interesting to look at this here. Obviously, not everybody is a pedophile on YouTube. And I'm also not saying that YouTube has pictures that are showing minors in various seriously compromising positions if you will. But this is kind of interesting because a YouTuber by the name of Matt Watson just this week exposed what he called a wormhole into a soft core pedophilia ring. And he posted this out on YouTube. He uploaded it on Sunday. So it hasn't even quite been a week yet. But his video claim to reveal a frankly, what's not so underground YouTube community of adults who are encouraging very young children to upload videos of themselves in compromising situations. I don't want to go into all of this because it just disgusts me, frankly. And I'm sure would you too. Now what's happening here, because of this coming out, is major corporations have pulled all of their advertising from YouTube once this came out because remember, Facebook is supposed to be policing itself. In fact, it entered into an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission years ago about self-policing. And Facebook's been accused of not following through with the plea deal. YouTube is also trying to be self-policing. But remember I said we've seen a lot of changes over the years where you know what is acceptable is not the same today as it was a few years ago. Obviously, this is not acceptable. So all kinds of people pulled funding. YouTube's trying to figure out how can they deal with this how can they find the pictures because these are not naked pictures that are easy enough to find through a computer an algorithm that showing a certain percentage of skin etc right that you normally would look for for the typical pornography. So, in this case, it's very difficult for them. There's a hashtag campaign over on Twitter and you might look it up if your Twitter user to find out more about this the hashtag is YouTubeWakeUp and within 24 hours these advertisers had caught on. It's crazy. We've got multiple ads from McDonalds Disney Grammarly, Chromebook, Purina, IKEA, Glad, GNC, Lysol and many others that just said forget about this. So, Watson's calling this as a small victory. It certainly is a victory. This battle still ongoing. And frankly, the public's known for a long time about child exploitation on YouTube. But so far, YouTube has failed to adequately address the issue according to Watson and some of these other people out there. Now, this video came out just days after multiple innocent YouTube channels were wrongly deleted after being flagged for tagging their videos with the abbreviation for child porn. And that happens all too often as well. Someone who doesn't like a YouTube channel, somebody that's a competitor in the financial space with a YouTube channel will go and flag, inappropriately flag content is being inappropriate wrong kitty porn etc. etc. So YouTube has a nightmare on their hands, right? It is like the boy who called wolf we just had that rest just this week an actor on TV who apparently came out and hired a couple of Nigerian guys, big bodybuilders to supposedly beat him up and put a noose around his neck and dump bleach on him. The accusations are flying on that front. But people do this kind of stuff all the time. So how is YouTube supposed to be able to deal with this? Even ads getting ads pulled down because of so-called inappropriate content or doesn't meet the Facebook guidelines or you know all across out there. It's difficult as an advertiser nowadays to figure this whole thing out. So interesting these videos that Watson exposes this week obviously slipped under the radar but we'll see what happens that YouTube if it simply enforces its rule that forbade uploads from users under the age of 13 that would have stopped all of these videos that we're just talking about. So a lot more my website. Check it out. http://CraigPeterson.com. You can find everything we talked about today. Plus more including what Facebook's doing to people who threatened employees. Procrastination. This is great. a Chrome extension you should look that up. You'll find it on my website. Why Windows Defender antivirus is the most deployed antivirus and big, big businesses out there and what is the dark web how to access it what you'll find it's not all necessarily bad there certainly is enough of that but it's not all bad out there all of that. http://CraigPeterson.com, and make sure you get my newsletter because that's going to keep you up to date on all the security stuff and get you the weekly show notes as well. Have a good great day and we'll see you next week. Take care. Bye-bye. --- Related articles: What Is The Dark Web? How To Access It And What You’ll Find Did Your Smart-Tv Start Showing You Shows You Didn’t Subscribe To? “TheHackerGiraffe” Says He’s Retired From Hacking Smart Tvs To Promote Pewdiepie Youtuber Claims Online Pedophile Ring Operates Freely On Youtube Why Windows Defender Antivirus Is The Most Deployed In The Enterprise Prevent Procrastination With This Chrome Extension Facebook Uses Its Apps To Track Users It Thinks Could Threaten Employees And Offices Zillow Wants To Flip Your House --- More stories and tech updates at: www.craigpeterson.com Don't miss an episode from Craig. Subscribe and give us a rating: www.craigpeterson.com/itunes Follow me on Twitter for the latest in tech at: www.twitter.com/craigpeterson For questions, call or text: 855-385-5553
There is nothing gross about this week's show. Well, almost nothing gross because our guest is FLW winner Buddy Gross. Buddy just scored a hundred thousand dollar check by weighing in a tremendous four-day weight down at Lake Toho in Orlando. Buddy offers up some tips that will help all to learn to catch more bass. Check out the interview with Buddy Gross. It's a good listen. Bob Allen is an author who has written a couple of really good children's books. He tells us how he got into writing kid's books and where he is going with it.
Welcome, everyone, to the official podcast of Granite Telecommunications, LLC, "Behind the micaPHONE." This inaugural episode is an introduction to the podcast as well to our company. Sr. VP of Premier Accounts, Bob Allen, joined us to discuss this history of Granite, and where he sees the growth, He also reveals what makes Granite such a success and why it is a special place to work.
Recent digs and jazz selections to start 2019. Tracklist: Circus, Father John D'amico Trio, Mongo Santamaria, Bob Allen, St. Mary's College of Maryland Jazz Ensemble, John Young Trio, Mt. Hood Community College Vocal Jazz Ensemble
Extremely interesting and challenging course by Bob Allen held at LCF in the middle of 2018.
Extremely interesting and challenging course by Bob Allen held at LCF in the middle of 2018.
Extremely interesting and challenging course by Bob Allen held at LCF in the middle of 2018.
Extremely interesting and challenging course by Bob Allen held at LCF in the middle of 2018.
Extremely interesting and challenging course by Bob Allen held at LCF in the middle of 2018.
Extremely interesting and challenging course by Bob Allen held at LCF in the middle of 2018.
Clinton failed to energize secular voters, Trump makes troubling cabinet appointments, an Indonesian governor faces charges of blasphemy, New Zealand atheists march to celebrate our ancestors, and I interview John S about We Agnostics, Atheists, & Freethinkers International AA Convention. Those are the headlines for the week of Saturday, December 10th, 2016.Sources:Secular Turn-out for Clinton Down:Mark Brockway, David Campbell, & Geoffrey Layman, “Secular voters didn’t turn out for Clinton the way white evangelicals did for Trump.” Accessed November 25, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m... Trump Taps Anti-Secularists for Cabinet Positions: Deidre Fulton, “Trump Nominates ‘True Enemy’ of Public Schools for Education Secretary.“ Accessed December 1, 2016. http://churchandstate.org.uk/2016/11/... Stephanie Mencimer, “Mike Pence's Voucher Program in Indiana Was a Windfall for Religious Schools.” Accessed December 2, 2016. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2... Rob Boston, “Jeff Sessions Is No Fan Of Separation Of Church And State.” Accessed December 1, 2016. https://www.au.org/blogs/wall-of-sepa...The Intellectualists, “Trump’s New Policy Adviser Said: There Is “Nothing More Christian” Than Cutting Food Stamps.” Accessed December 7, 2016. http://theintellectualist.co/trumps-n... Indonesian Blasphemy Case:John McBeth, “Blasphemy probe rocks Indonesia’s secular foundations.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://www.thenational.ae/world/south...Kate Lamb, “Jakarta's Christian governor to face blasphemy trial over Islam insult claim.” Accessed December 3, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/world/201... WAAFT AA Convention:We Agnostics, Atheists, & Freethinkers in AA: waaft.orgNew Zealand Atheist Pride March:Shawn McAvinue, “Atheist Pride march, rain, hail or shine.” Accessed November 29, 2016. https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/at... Roger Grauwmeijer & Bruce Mahalski, “Photos of the Atheist Pride March in Dunedin.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://www.vice.com/en_nz/read/photos... News Ticker:Ekathimerini, “Archbishop Ieronymos against separation of Church & state.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://www.ekathimerini.com/213628/ar... Gregory Tomlin, “Atheist group loses hometown radio station to 24-hour Christmas music.” Accessed November 28, 2016. http://christianexaminer.com/article/... Heather Clark, “Atheist Activist Group Objects to Weekly Bible Study at Wisconsin State Capitol.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://christiannews.net/2016/11/18/a... Anita Cates, “Jack T. Chick, Cartoonist Whose Tracts Preached Salvation, Dies at 92.” http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/27/art... BBC. “US atheist sues after Kentucky refuses 'IM GOD' number plate.” Accessed December 2, 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-cana...Colin Perkel, “Minister asks to be defrocked over treatment of atheist colleague.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/n... Bob Allen, “Controversial religion clause stripped from defense policy bill.” Accessed December 2, 2016. https://baptistnews.com/article/contr...
Dr Bob Allen and his team share their experience with the Lateral thigh Perforator flap for breast reconstruction Tuinder SMH, Beugels J, Lataster A, de Haan MW, Piatkowski A, Saint-Cyr M, van der Hulst RRWJ, Allen RJ. The Lateral Thigh Perforator Flap for Autologous BreastReconstruction: A Prospective Analysis of 138 Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):257-268
Bob Allen on Training Beyond Your Carry Permit. What and Why. David and Mark are joined by Bob Allen, Director of Training at Royal Range USA in Nashville, Tennessee, to talk about what training the civilian should seek out beyond their Handgun Carry Permit, and why. In this episode we talk about moving past the fundamentals, the advantages of curated one-to-one training, the practicality of Force on Force training for civilians, and some of the more common misconceptions about what training among casual gun owners and carry practitioners. Mr. Allen is a 34-year veteran of the Nashville Police, 21-year SWAT team instructor and lead instructor of firearms and defensive tactics for Metro’s Police Academy. Episode Bookmarks 00:06:45 - Bob Allen of Royal Range Firearms Training Center 00:16:30 - Guest Profile. Mr. Allen's Credentials 00:22:00 - Training beyond the carry permit. What and why? 00:33:00 - Carrying without a round in the chamber? 00:38:30 - Excuses for not getting additional training. 00:41:30 - Start of Second Segment 00:50:00 - Have your students survived actual shootings? 00:57:00 - Practice yields competence in critical moments 01:02:00 - Solving complex equations in chaos 01:06:00 - Open vs Concealed Carry 01:15:00 - Where do I start beyond the carry permit? 01:22:00 - Confrontations happen closer than you may think. 01:26:00 - Training allows you to test your gear! 01:37:30 - How to connect with Bob Allen 01:40:00 - What's coming up on Shooters Nation soon Mentioned in This Episode Royal Range Firearms Training Center Indoor Shooting Range and Retail Store Nashville, Tennessee www.royalrangeusa.com Connect With Us After the Show Do you follow us on Instagram or Facebook? Instagram @ShootersNationRadio https://www.facebook.com/shootersnation/ Get News and Special Offers! Be sure to sign up for the Shooters Nation Mail Blast newsletter by visiting https://www.shootersnation.com/mailblast and adding yourself to our mailing list. Got an idea for a future episode? Let us know at https://www.shootersnation.com/idea Sponsors Squared Away Customs Quality Custom Kydex Holsters and Carry Gear Be sure to use discount code "SHOOTERSNATION" when ordering! Like what you're hearing? Want to support the podcast and help make future episodes possible? Every dollar donated helps make this show possible. https://www.shootersnation.com/donate
Al Walker was an early adopter of solar energy in Douglas County when he built his off-the-grid home near Idleyld Park. Al tought the subject at Umpqua Community Collage, and then became a solar installer consultant. Bob Allen, also present, was one of his first customers. Al talks about he solar-energy in the area over the last 20 years, and how it has evolved to today. Al and Bob also use their home solar energy systems to charge up their electric cars. They discuss the different types of electric cars in use today, and where to access electric car chargers in the state. Al talks about small hydropower systems, and who can install them. Bob discusses the local electrical coops, and how they integrate home solar systems. For more information, see https://dcsmartenergy.org/
Episode 234: ControlTalk NOW — Smart Buildings PodCast for week ending August 6, 2017 features more great insight from energy expert, Mark Jewell, and two deep-dive interviews with AutomatedBuildings.com’s, Ken Sinclair, and Optergy’s president, Steve Guzelimian. Make sure to register for upcoming webinars from Belimo, ACI’s, and Schneider Electric. ControlTalk NOW guest Mark Jewel, renowned expert trainer and coach, business consultant, and solutions designer. Selling Power magazine recently ranked Mark’s company, Selling Energy, as one of the nation’s Top 20 Sales Training Firms. Mark has influenced energy efficiency decisions in three billion square feet of real estate in his 25+ years in this industry and has trained countless controls manufacturers, distributors and contractors how to differentiate themselves with segment-specific, concise messaging and more effective approaches to driving their revenues and margins. ControlTalk NOW’s first interview is with Ken Sinclair who reviews his August edition of AutomatedBuildings.com. Ken takes us on a profound tour of the dogged progression towards autonomous devices and autonomous buildings. Ken’s editorial first links us to the relevant technology thought-leaders, while the body of the August edition provides an excellent array of perspectives from various industry experts. Ken even spices things up a bit with some info on CryptoCurrency, Blockchain, and Bitcoin. The once cloud-bound flow of data is in flux. The edge is fogging up, and Hey You! — Get off of my Cloud! ControlTalk NOW’s second guest interview is with Steve Guzelimian, President, Optergy. Steve offers the following analogy with regards to combining BMS and EMS Analogy: “It could be said that operating a building is analogous to driving a car. If the driver has visibility of the road, feedback from gauges and a steering wheel, they will be in full control. Take away the driver’s road visibility or feedback from gauges; they will crash or run out of fuel. Remove the driver’s steering wheel, and inevitably the car will crash on the first corner. BMS is the steering wheel, EMS is the visibility and feedback.” New Belimo Website Coming August 7th! Register Now for August 16th, 1:00 PM EDT, for Informational Webinar. On August 7th, Belimo will launch a new and improved website. You can place orders faster, save project lists, download multiple data sheets and have full access to your account files. Join Belimo August 16th at 1:00 PM EDT for an informational webinar on the features of the newly released Belimo website. You will experience how easy it is to access marketing materials and enhanced e-commerce functionalities. The webinar will conclude with an interactive question and answer session. Please join us and provide your feedback and questions. Register Now! Converging Smart Building Systems and IT with Siemon. So many systems, so many cables, so many wires, it get’s so complicated so fast. Fear not, we had a chance to catch up with Bob Allen from Siemon the company that among other things has a Smart Building Cabling Solution. In this video Bob explains Siemon’s revolutionary approach to making cabling easier, faster, and more efficient. Do you want to reduce capital expense, increase operational savings, and improve the tenant experience? Siemon ConvergeIT is a unified intelligent building (IB) cabling solution that combines Siemon’s proven quality with advanced copper and fiber cabling technology to create a structured cabling system that converges critical data, voice, video and low-voltage building systems onto a single unified physical infrastructure, providing significant cost savings and sustainability over the life of the facility. Schneider Electric Webinar Invite: August 9th at 1PM EST to learn about Square D VFDs. Join Scott and Brandon on August 9th at 1PM EST to learn about Square D VFDs. This webinar will cover all Square D VFD offers in iPortal, the selection tool, stocking program for S-Flex and the ATV 600 line and an overview of other Square D offers. The webinar will be approximately one hour in length. RSVP and add to your calendar! ACI’s LIVE Temperature Transmitter Webinar 8/16 at 10:30 A.M. CST. ACI’s TEMPERATURE WEBINAR FEATURING TRANSMITTERS AUGUST 16|10:30 A.M. CST. The ACI 2017 Webinar Series continues Wednesday, August 16th. ACI’s Sales Engineer, Brant Kasbohm, will discuss the differences between ACI’s Temperature Transmitter models. During the webinar, Brant plans to highlight the important differences between Class A & Class B RTDs while diving into details regarding our transmitters and their improved accuracies. Brant will also cover ACI’s NIST Certification process and why it’s a key component in the overall performance and long term reliability of our temperature transmitters. Register Now! The post Episode 234: ControlTalk NOW — Smart Buildings PodCast for Week Ending August 6, 2017 appeared first on ControlTrends.
Was Craig responsible for an Astros uniform design change? You'll be rolling on the floor when we catch up with one of the funniest guys in Houston TV sports history. What are his thoughts on the Astros, Texans, Rockets, Drayton McClain & the early Jeff Bagwell years? He explains why Bill Balleza is a war hero, what Dave Ward meant to local news & why Bob Allen's passing hit him hard. Craig spent 20 years as KPRC Channel 2 Sports Director & 6 years as News92 Sports Director.
We look back at those sports legends lost this past year with stories & anecdotes from those who knew them. Mickey Herkowitz tells us about his time with Muhammad Ali. KPRC Channel 2's Randy McIlvoy remembers interning with longtime Houston sports anchor Bob Allen. Safety Bubba McDowell talks about his old Oilers coach, Defensive Coordinator Buddy Ryan. Kenny Hand explains how Arnold Palmer changed his life. Houston Aeros voice Jerry Trupiano reveals the greatness of Gordie Howe through his time covering Mr. Hockey. Greg Lucas explains how Monte Irvin could've been the real Jackie Robinson.
What follows is an edited transcript of my conversation with Judy Stephenson. Petersen: You're listening to Economics Detective Radio. My guest today is Judy Stephenson of Oxford University's Wadham college. Judy, welcome to Economics Detective Radio. Stephenson: Thank you very much. It's nice to be here. Petersen: So, our topic for today is economic history. Specifically we’ll be looking at some interesting research Judy has done on wage rates in the early modern period in London. This period is particularly interesting because it's the start of the Industrial Revolution which leads to a dramatic increase in the growth living standards and of technology and that trend of course is what has shaped our modern world and made it different from the world of the past. So, it's very important of course to understand this period if we want to understand the world as it is now. So Judy, start by giving us historical background. What was the world like in the period you study? Stephenson: Well, I work mostly on researching London, so urban environments. And London is very developed in this period between about 1600 and 1800. And London becomes the biggest city in the world during this period and as the biggest city in the world it's hugely vibrant, some of the largest merchant houses in the world are there, banking is advanced and developing. Most of the occupations of London are tertiary or service sector, even at this early date. The river is a huge source of both transportation and work, the port is where much of the capital, both physical and financial, from around the world comes through the city, and the professions and bureaucracy are well established in London in this period. It's growing at all levels of society, from the very poorest to the very richest exponentially. So, if you look at the population growth overall in the U.K. in the late 17th century from 1500-1600 to 1700, that actually is pretty much stable or slightly declining. But the population of London grows by a third or something in that period. London is this hugely vibrant commercial social and cultural center and it's pretty much overtaken Amsterdam, which has come to the end of its golden age in the mid 17th century, right at this period. So, although the world more generally and in a wider sense can be typified by pre-industrial or agrarian values, London is very commercial in this period. Petersen: Okay, so, if I were to get in a time machine and go back in time, maybe London would be more familiar to me, would seem, feel more modern than almost any other place. Stephenson: I think it would be very familiar to you the way of getting around would be a sedan chair or a carriage. You can hire them on the street, in fact you send your boy out to get one. It looks very like Uber, it's a gig economy. And most people working in unskilled, or who didn't have a trade or didn't have a profession or skill probably didn't have steady jobs. They thought of themselves as having work that they could rely on, but it wasn't wholly reliable and they definitely didn't have a contract that would keep them going, they probably didn't have many rights either. And they probably worked at two or three things and everything---the traditional literature about London in this period is one of inequality. So the very very poor literally scavenging on the streets among the smut because the streets were the sewers in those days, and the very very rich living in these incredibly grand environments with retinues and servants. It's a golden age for the aristocracy after they had a pretty rubbish time in the 16th century. It's a golden age for the aristocracy, it's a golden age for art, for architecture, for all these things but it is also a period of desperate poverty and mortality. The plague doesn't die out in London until the end of the 17th century, but still very very high infant mortality and living standards are nothing like they become in the later 19th century, after they sorted out all those things. But from a commercial point of view, you might well recognise it. Petersen: It's very interesting---and of course the whole period is interesting---but it's particularly interesting for what it becomes, really. The rest of the world starts becoming more like London, starting in this period. Stephenson: Yes. Petersen: And so you study wage rate of some of the day labourers and the workers in that period. How have economic historians gone about measuring things and getting data that far back in the past? Stephenson: Well, data on wages and prices for this period was originally gathered by a guy---Thorold Rogers---who was a 19th century historian who started collecting wages and prices in the mid 19th century and finished 40 years later, literally a broken man. These are seven volumes from around England and he basically went into any long run institution where there was an archive or records, as they were called in those days, and just noted the quantities and prices found in the books. But it was a huge project way before the days of even print noting, before the days of an efficient typewriter, let alone a computer. It was pretty haphazard as to what he was actually recording but it's very accurate. But he tended to take down labour costs or wages as day rates, and what he mostly found were builders because he was in big Oxford colleges and places like Westminster Abbey which had buildings from the 13th century and had required a lot of building maintenance and surprisingly he didn't find many other wages. So this way of recording had a sort of half dependence. These day rates because they were the only ones that people could find it was assumed that wages---wage rates are very hard to find but there's always good ones for builders---and it was assumed that builders were the same everywhere in terms of skill levels so these could be comparative. And Arthur Bowley---who is known as the father of modern statistics, an economist and statistician again working in the end of the 19th century and in the early 20th century---used builders in his first attempts to think statistically about an average wage, an average worker, and to establish a real wage. And Bowley’s work is absolutely seminal in the history of statistics, econometrics, and economic history. And he used Rogers' and others' wage rates of builders. And this tradition carried on as other historians gathered more rates, like Elizabeth Gilboy in the 1930s, and then Phelps Brown and Hopkins used all these people's data when they came up with the seminal Seven Centuries of Building Wages in 1955. And what Phelps Brown and Hopkins had done was they took all those day rates from the builders, and then they took a series of wages and prices and they created a basket of goods and they offset the wages against the prices and they came up with an index of the real wage or living standards across the ages. And this has been the standard for measuring welfare since 1955. And because it's very difficult to find wage rates for the 18th century for some of the reasons I spoke about a minute ago---not many people have jobs, etc etc etc---the dependence on builders' wages continued until, with the most amazing econometric and advanced econometrics techniques that Greg Clarke and Robert Allen were using, they still use that data from the 1930s. I think the latest good index Jeremy Boulton made in the early ‘90's, where he collected about 2,700 observations of wage rates. The key thing to remember here is all of these wage rates came from bills in the archives of the institutions. So they’re not really wages. In fact they are not wages at all. So, I don't know if you've ever worked for somebody and been charged out by the day, have you? Petersen: I have not, but my wife is charged out, she works in data science and yes, she gets one wage and she's charged out to other firms at a different rate. Stephenson: And what she's charged out is higher, right? So, when I worked in advertising, I cost my clients about 1,800 pounds a day, I saw about 350 of that. What a bloody enormous margin, actually. You got to look at how IPG were not making a really stonking profit on that but you know there's overhead and those kinds of things. Well, in the 18th century everything, but particularly in the building trades, that's exactly how you dealt with masons or bricklayers or carpenters or labourers. And any economy that has to organize production---and the building they were organizing was pretty big, the Great Fire of London destroyed the old city and was completely rebuilt in about a decade---there's some serious organizational coordination mechanism problems of making all that stuff happen. And the 18th century way of doing it is contract it out. Firms are a series of sub-contracts and so the way wage rates have been collected were the sums that were paid to contractors and what those contractors pay their men were substantially lower than those wages that Phelps Brown and Hopkins had used, or Robert Allen had used and Rogers and people have recorded. Petersen: Okay. In your paper you mention Robert Allen and he had a hypothesis that based on these faulty rage weights that high wages in London were a contributing factor in kicking off mechanization in the Industrial Revolution. So, can you talk a little bit about that hypothesis and how your new look at the data has, I suppose, called it into question? Stephenson: Yeah. So, Allen has made the most seminal contribution to the study of the Industrial Revolution. So, the Industrial Revolution is the savored big debate in economic history really and it's a favorite big debate for lots of parts or disciplines within economic history. The history of technology people like it because of the gadgets, the history of macroeconomics and supply and demand people like it because of the factor prices, the history of the organizational people and sociological people like it because of the institutions in the factories. So it has this broad appeal for everybody who's interested in the economics of the long run. Essentially, the core issue around the Industrial Revolution is it's unexplained. Why did it occur in England before anywhere else? It's this naughty problem that had never really been adequately explained until the early 2000s. Then there were two competing---well not two competing but two complementary---explanations by sort of giants of economic history in the same period. So, Bob Allen explained it through England being a high-wage economy and Joel Mokyr explained it through a series of innovations and enlightenment and how that brings about sort of an intellectual enlightment in scientific innovation. Allen’s theory was the economists’ theory and still is. And essentially what he proposed is that the high wages of England incentivized the owners of production to substitute capital for labour. Essentially because of the way series are constructed when you take all those comparative wage series of Amsterdam, London, Milan, Florence, Madrid, Antwerp, Strasbourg, when you sort of put them all together as a real wage series in the long run, the English wages looked substantially higher by comparison, particularly after 1650. It looked like the cost of labour for capital in England was much higher than it was in the rest of North Western Europe or Italy, where you had the traditional textile industries and banking, where there was some quite advanced commerce in places. Allen argued that the high wage economy first of all created those incentives but that also it had created higher human capital and skills, attracted capital to it, to prepare England for industrialization in the long run. But that the trigger was induced innovation through relative factor prices. And part of his theory also was that coal was cheap and available in England, which is very hard to argue that it wasn't, the coal in China is in Mongolia, the Dutch don't have any they've got coal in the Ruhr, of course. But you know coal has been at the center of English energy requirements for a very long time as Tony Wrigley has written about in a very distinct way actually in a lovely book called Energy and the English Industrial Revolution, which is the kind of thing your children could read. So the relative factor prices between energy and capital and labour were unique in England is Allen’s argument. So, obviously if you find out that the wages are 20% to 30% to even 40% lower than Allen thought, that presents a problem for that theory. Petersen: I believe I heard once that Germany had coal but it had to be transported over land and so was as good as useless to them before the age of the steam engine and trucking. Coal is really important. And so Robert Allen felt that high wages in London and in England were important but it seems like this issue of measuring the contract rate instead of the wage rate casts doubt on that, or even---does it close the whole gap between London and the rest of Europe? Stephenson: Good question. And that really depends on what sort of organizational form or coordination mechanism was in place in other countries. So,I've looked into this with Amsterdam and Antwerp quite a bit already. I've done some work with Heidi Deneweth who works on the Low Countries on economy and building particularly. She's at Ghent. And we're finding in the way that building is organized in Amsterdam, in London, is that in London very much the state has completely outsourced everything. So, the city doesn't employ people directly, that's too much hassle. It seems like the cost of management to something is very high in England because they outsource everything: the navy, the supply, the whole thing. Bits of the navy are integrated into it, but a lot of it, particularly the supply to it, is outsourced and all building is outsourced. Whereas in Amsterdam the city still employs people who are digging dikes, and looking after canals, and doing maintenance work on public buildings. Whereas in London the comparable projects which would be stopping London Bridge from falling down, or wharfing the fleet ditch and making these canals and things. Those are given to large contractors and the contractors are solely responsible for labour. Whereas there is some relationship between labour and the city, people are directly employed in Amsterdam, this is indicative only and we need to do a lot more work on comparing contracts in the same types of organizations. And then there's a guy called Luca Maccarelli, who is an established Italian historian of the building industry and industry in Milan generally and he has looked at some of the data for the wages for Florence and Milan particularly and he has shown that the day rate was only part of the wage there. In fact the contractors were throwing food, bonuses, cash savings, access to places to stay, and all sorts of perks at workers to try and induce them to work. So the wage in Italy was probably a little bit higher. In fact, Mark Reilly has said that we've understated Italy’s by 15-20% and then the person who's done the most work on France so far is Vincent Geloso, who's shown that the Strasbourg wages are probably problematic. But all this comparative stuff is at a really early stage. And we need people to get out into the field, the way I've been in the field in London, and look at more the form of employment and the form of the wage in those places. And really understand, the figures that we've got are they real or have they got other sort of recording factors like I've shown in London? So it's too soon to say although we started work on that. Petersen: So, for the modern era we have people collecting data and they're making a big effort to collect the same data across time and across place. Surveys asking the same survey question to everyone, or government data and making sure it's collected in the same way every year but when we're going back to the past, of course there was no one in the year 1700 collecting data on Italy, and London, and Amsterdam, and all these different places. And so we have to stitch it together from what is available and often that's very different datasets. Stephenson: Exactly, and different types of records. So, it may be the case that all the records are a bit skewed and you know there'll be a new schema once we have all the new data together that does reproduce the Allen’s story. And remember that we need to take the prices of goods into account. It's a real wage calculation he's done not just a nominal wage calculation. But until we've done that, what we do know is the living standards in England were not what Allen thought at the moment but you've got to do the whole comparative thing to know. Petersen: So, how do you distinguish the skilled from the unskilled? How do you make sure you're comparing the same kind of labour? Stephenson: That's a good question. Traditionally pretty much everywhere in Europe we've gathered two types of wage: a skilled wage for what we call craftsmen and craftsman are people who have completed an apprenticeship, who are qualified, that's the idea. So, a mason who has studied seven years in England---doesn't seem to be as long anywhere else---or a carpenter who has studied in the long run. So, who has invested time in the development of the human capital and acquired skills and then we think about the unskilled person as a counterpoint as being the labourer. And this is another important distinction because you know building labourers are actually of two kinds: there's the completely unskilled guy. Actually there are three kinds: there's the completely unskilled guy who's basically just handing them nails or wheeling a barrel around. But then there's the more skilled or semi-skilled assistant who actually is doing a lot more than that, who is preparing the work for the craftsman, who knows which tools go with which materials and who is fully assisting a craftsman and they couldn't really do the work without them. And you call that semi-skilled. And then there's a labourer who is hired really for their brawn. They've got a premium for being extremely strong and what you tend to see in building accounts is people who are actually hired by the load. They get 2 shillings and 8 to move a ton over a day or something---and probably need more than one man to do that---but so there's a brawn premium in these labourers or unskilled. And actually from Phelps Brown and Hopkins onwards we've taken this semi-skilled or brawn wage to be the unskilled wage, but these people aren't unskilled. Whereas the unskilled, the guy wheeling the barrel, or just picking out nails was paid a lot less than those. So, if the rate for the semi-skilled guy was 18 pence a day in 1700, the rate for the unskilled guy was 12 to 14. So you can see there's a considerable premium in here. That's another thing that colours our understanding of welfare because usually it's the unskilled or subsistence wage that the macroeconomist is interested in. They relate unskilled and subsistence even though they maybe should not. It's that unskilled wage that is an indication of supply and demand in the labour market, and the draw of that. So taking building labour to a semi-skilled to be unskilled leads to some problems because it implies that unskilled people in London could afford four times the subsistence basket of welfare goods in 1700, when actually they could barely afford two. So, if you're going to use a welfare basket these rates have a real issue and the distinction between skilled is… Petersen: So, the reason maybe we care more about unskilled wages is because that's the wage that you'd expect to see in other places in the economy. For instance unskilled work in agriculture or working in a shop or things that we don't have data for we can sort of guess because presumably there's a labour market and people have mobility and if there was too big a gap between wages for different unskilled jobs then people would move, they’d arbitrage away that difference. So your paper, it has some sort of case studies. You have data from particular construction projects. I thought those might be interesting to go through. So, one of them is the reconstruction of St Paul's Cathedral after the Great Fire of London, which is a massive project, could you talk a little bit about that? Stephenson: Well, yes it's a famous project because the old St. Paul’s had stood since I think the 14th century. It was this you know cultural and emotional symbol for Londoners apparently, and it had been redesigned---the front had been redesigned---by Indigo Jones, the kind of father of classical architecture in England. And it was completely destroyed by the fire and this was a sort of symbolic task to rebuild and so Christopher Wren hailed the King, came up with the design and you know Wren is pretty much the father of modern architecture and he's this enormous intellectual as well as architectural figure, he's very much part of the enlightenment. So the project lasted about 35-40 years, so they declared it finished in 1711 and the Great Fire was 1666 and it's still there today, absolutely intact, it survived the Second World War. So it's this incredible and very emotive building. The interesting thing from a work point of view is it's very much a craftsman's building, it's not an artist's building. So there is sculpture there, there is painting but nothing like a European cathedral like St. Peter's, St. Paul’s is very much a display of English craftsmanship and baroque style and most of it is stone faced. So, I have these wonderful papers, which are the day books of one of the Master Masons, one of the contracting masons who built the south west tower on the west front. His name was William Camster, his father was also a contracting mason on a separate contract and in the network of masons who served, ran and worked. We’d ran over 30 or 40 years and he was on site for about 10 years of the project from 1700 to 1709 or so and some after and I have his day books right, years of this, where he records every single man that was working for him and what they paid him. So, it's got an appeal because you can go and see what they did---which is very rare---working on the 18th century that you get some wage records and you can actually see the product as well. So, it's quite nice from that point of view. So, from an economist's point of view the interesting thing is the way that they contracted the construction because they just started out one contract at a time and then if it worked, they’d go "Yes. We'll do that again." So, they had these repeated idiosyncratic contingent claims contracting going on and on and on and obviously disputes arise and they resolve them, or people drop out and they get new contractors. But the whole thing is basically on a rolling contingent claims contract what Oliver Hart and Holmström said could never happen. Oliver Williamson would have had his head in his hands. But the other notable thing is that the contractors financed this really because the Crown didn't pay them. It did pay them but the Crown and the city, they leveraged the coal tax but mostly people waited two or three years on contracts to be paid. So, the cost of financing that was just swallowed up by the contractors, it was in the price. And that's one of the reasons why you see a margin on labour and materials. But the interest costs for St. Paul's were as a total of the entire bill over 35 years about 20%, and very little of that had been lent by citizens and the city, a lot of that had come from the contractors themselves through just rolling over bills. Petersen: That's interesting. So, we know not only what they were paying their day labours, but also implicitly we know the interest rate for that time. Stephenson: We do. Yes, 6% for to and from the cathedral. Six percent on an annualized basis. Stephen Quinn and Temin and Voth have found higher rates, above 8% for some private lending around the same time. And it is likely that these contractors will have had to have done some private borrowing or lending within their networks to keep rolling this finance over. Because they will have bought the stone, they will have paid the carter, they will have paid the labours who are working for the carter, they will have paid the craftsman, so they may have well have to borrow to do all those things but 6% is what they got from the cathedral. But the real question is then, so these networks of supply chains are surviving on that kind of finance. So really big contracts essentially on a very high level of trust or a very high level of interest. We need to do more work to find out which, but it does seem like these networks---because they repeatedly contract---they have good information and it's more effective than you would imagine those types of contracts to be. Petersen: And of course they're contracting---it's the government paying for it ultimately right? Stephenson: Yes, and it's financed through the coal tax which is also interesting. Bearing in mind the price of coal is relevant to development at this time. The coal tax was levied at a shilling a cauldron after the Great Fire to rebuild the churches for the city and then it was maintained through and into the Georgian period by parliament who kept sort of either adding to it or continuing it and apparently it was detested and greatly avoided. But we definitely need some more research on how this work, and how people avoided it, and and what it did to coal consumption. Because you find in the accounts that the coal tax, they're expecting this much per year from it and consistently about 10 to 15% less comes in. So they have to turn to the city or to commissioners and people who might have money to borrow from them and tide it over. So financing the thing was unconventional. Petersen: So, we usually think of government debt as being highly safe at least in the modern period but back then it may not have been. Stephenson: Yes, and I don't know what the connection to other Treasury things are and Bank of England and everything. At the time it looks like it's just private between St. Paul's and the commissioners for St. Paul’s and either citizens or contractors and that it wasn't actually securitized as a state promise, but there may have been connections. It's something I haven't delved into enough. Petersen: So, another construction project, in this case it's a maintenance project, is the famous London Bridge which of course in the nursery rhyme "London Bridge is falling down" which apparently was true. Can you tell me a little bit about that? Stephenson: So, well London Bridge was it was built the end of 13th century and it's 19 stone piers across the Thames. It must have been the most fascinating and amazing structure, it stood for pretty much 500 years, but by the end of the 16th century in the early 17th century it is falling down. And the Thames because this sort of development further up river as well, the Thames is actually a very strongly flowing tidal river at this stage and the force of the water force through those 19 piers is wearing away. So they built wooden starlings, so they built a wooden constructions they look like boats around the piers, trying to guide the water through and these of course made the problem worse and they made the waters faster. So to pass under the bridge in a boat at high tide apparently you could drop 10 feet through the rushing rapids beneath. So you pay the shootsman who was contracted by the bridge to guide you through the piers. And it was really quite dangerous. So, the bridge has a number of maintenance problems: the first is the starlings the mason repairs. The second is until the mid 18th century the bridge was covered in housing just like Ponte Vecchio in Florence as a proper living bridge the housing was also in a state of disrepair and some of it owned by the bridge and some of it owned privately. So the bridge tried to take over the property that isn't theirs and then get rid of the housing that isn't working, it's falling into disrepair over this period. And there's a guy called Mark Leighton who's written a brilliant thesis at the University of Leicester all about how the bridge masters and the City of London get rid of the housing in the mid 18th century. But essentially the bridge is the only crossing from side to side, from north to south or vice versa until 1750. There isn't another way to cross the Thames. There was a little wooden bridge up in Putney in 1729. London Bridge it's got all of the infrastructure of London basically. And so it's hugely congested and falling apart. So, the maintenance bills are are huge. Oh yeah as well. So as well as the starlings you then have water wheels which are basically bringing the water from the New River Company and the Thames to give water to the city. So those are also in operation, these whole teams of little engineers looking after the water wheels. So it's a really busy bridge it's got people scrambling over it all the time looking after it, not before the shootsman or anybody else doing any work on it and those people were paid not very much. The master craftsmen were paid for their contract and got a really good rate for looking after the contract, and then they hired others piecemeal so they'd hire well-known carpenters or masons. But they'd never have regular days or regular work and then the labourers were paid by the tide. So at high tide you could work on the bridge or you could work on the upper bits of the bridge if you were in a boat; at low tide you could access all those damaged starlings and piers. So at low tide they worked in boats and that meant that in the winter you might only get four tides in the week depending on when the tide and the light coincided, in the summer you could maybe get 11 and then when they didn't need any work done you wouldn't get any tides at all. So, there were quite a number of people. It varied from teams of 12 to teams of 80 or so who were employed in this fashion in a piecemeal just waiting for a little sort of bit of peace work on London Bridge. So, it's an interesting bit of contact with the sort of materiality of the world as well, everything was literally ruled by when the water came in. Petersen: Right. And since it's such a long period of time, I suppose you can get a decent time series of that change in the wages over that period. Stephenson: Yes, from a labour economist point of view, one of the fascinating things about the 18th century is this persistence of rates, particularly for labourers, it's a very monopsonistic market it's a classic monopsonistic market. It's a wage posting. One where employers basically will see who will come at this set wage and what happens is they don't change the wage. The fluctuation happens around the number of days worked. So people don't turn up, or don't get work when there is less to do. The number of days fall away and when there is high demand, an upward-sloping curve, the number of days go up for everybody. But a transaction cost analysis would suggest that the 18th century employer understood the costs of such information very well indeed because they weren't going to have any asymmetry of information. They were going to post ‘this is what you get,’ particularly the unskilled hand and the time or the amount of work that you got was how the fluctuations and the dispersion occurred. So there's a lot more work to be done on that because nobody's really ever looked at this kind of market in those modern terms, understanding it as monopsonistic or having search or information costs. And it's only with these levels of micro data that we can begin to understand that it might have worked like the labour market we know. Until about 20 years ago people thought---until much more recently actually, the last paper I can see about this is in 2007 by Leonard Schwartz---that essentially before 1840 it's a market dominated by custom not by market forces. But on a micro analysis it looks very much like there are just the kind of market forces at play that we understand today. So, wage posting at the lower level, a little bit of wage bargaining at the skills level, and supply and demand do actually equilibrate but not through the rate, through the number of days worked, which of course brings about the income. Petersen: So, the third construction project you discuss is the Westminster Bridge, which I suppose is that that second bridge you mentioned earlier. Stephenson: Yes, the second bridge, the cross rail of the 18th century. Petersen: Is that interesting from an economic history point of view, we have a lot of data from that? Stephenson: You get less data because I don't have anybody's nice little book saying who came in and on which day, so I don't have the number of days' work for Westminster Bridge. The interesting thing about Westminster Bridge is the different kinds of contract. Everybody, they were making contracts for hundreds of thousands of pounds with the masons and engineers and they also had a contract with a guy who had a horse and three piles for 27 pounds for the year. So, you've got this variation in value or risk from a financial point of view which is quite dramatic. But the key thing is that at Westminster Bridge you find the tide and the day model as well. So a much smaller number of days than you would expect that are actually billed to the institution, but this means of paying by the tide, which protects productivity from an employer's point of view. So that also occurs at Westminster Bridge. And what you find is that people are doing quite advanced and quite dangerous work, but without the danger money. They were given gin instead. So they sank caissons, this is one of the earliest uses of caissons designed to create the piers. So these things are experimental to say the least, and they put people in diving gear into the caissons and it must have been terrifying, you know, what if the stuff gave way and they went under the Thames. In February, because that's the time you want to be in the Thames! You know, in 18th century diving gear. And got them to work on the masonry or on the carpentry on the bed of the river for the same rate as you could be having quite a nice comfy time carving out something simple, or doing some basic maintenance work on a couple of windows on some bridge houses. So, yes very dangerous work. There seemed to be a lot of skill available, ready to do that work at those kinds of rates. Petersen: So, where do you see this research program going in the future? Stephenson: There's obviously an issue about the rate of welfare, the real wage and welfare in the 18th century and to be honest if we're going to make a serious contribution to that, we need to start looking at people who aren't builders. I've started a project with the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, where I spent a year before I went to Oxford, on London occupations. Because that Cambridge group, they are the masters of working on occupational structure in the long run in England and we are sampling institutions that bought goods and services widely. And the kind of bills and the kind of businesses that they deal with to understand what sort of people were employed where. So, to try and get some welfare and some wage data beyond builders that we can normalize and use properly. I think the second direction for this research is to understand how labour markets worked. Was there such a thing as custom? Because one of the old things we believe about the Industrial Revolution, and this idea doesn't really stand up anymore, but it's something that's still emotionally alluring for a lot of people, we see the Industrial Revolution as that sort of capitalism thing and our version of capitalism got going. But if people already understood transaction cost economics, and Christopher Wren writes like Oliver Williamson sometimes, then maybe the market didn't start then, maybe they already had a view of the market. And there are some organizational things that we need to be looking at from that point of view. Essentially the 18th century will always be interesting because it is a free market. It is unregulated, there's no corporation tax and the finance is not state controlled at all. This is before the gold standard, this is before states get interested in managing money in a big way. There is monetary policy but it's not in the same way we conceive it now. And so labour and capital have a relationship that is unencumbered by the state, by government, by regulation. So what is the outcome of that? Was it a race to the bottom, was there any equilibrium, what happened? So, there's a contribution to be made to studying that as a sort of a history of ideas thing as well. It's hugely rich but those are broadly the three things that are on my agenda right now. Petersen: My guest today has been Judy Stephenson. Judy thanks for being a part of Economics Detective Radio. Stephenson: Thank you very much. I very much enjoyed talking to you.
Bob Allen and his team's latest work on the use of the Profunda Artery Perforator flap is reviewed in this month's podcast. The full article is below Allen RJ Jr, Lee ZH, Mayo JL, Levine J, Ahn C, Allen RJ Sr. The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Experience for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov;138(5):968-975
With Bob Allen's passing, we look back at his 42 years as a sports director in Houston with KPRC Sports Director Randy McIlvoy & KHOU's videographer for 35 years, George Jensen. Both McIlvoy & Jensen worked for & against Allen. They tell us what he was like professionally & personally.
We sat down with Bob and Betty Allen during Homecoming Weekend to talk about life at both Wabash and DePauw, their time at Mud Hollow, and their children (Episode 76).
God has a purpose and plan for Discover Life Church. In this message, Bob Allen shares the steps to seeing the DLC dream come true.
America's most historic square mile takes center stage on Travel Itch Thursday at 8p EDT when Bob Allen, general manager of the Philadelphia Downtown Marriott, visits with Dan Schlossberg and Christine Tibbetts. Tune in via iTunes or BlogTalkRadio.com.
The results of the PAX East event.
Bob Allen shares a message with us on Colossians 4:7-18.To find out more and download accompanying notes please see our website www.billericaybaptist.net
A Retro Musical Extravaganza. Presented entirely by the Retrobots, with a little help. A full hour of various collected love songs from the era of old time radio. The original play list was so long, it could have easily filled a second hour. Instead, the audio quality has been boosted a little so this will be a larger file. I hope you enjoy. Please make comments, and let me know what you think about seeing more, or fewer of these kinds of shows. Playlist: 1. When Pa Was Courting Ma. Tex Beneky, Glenn Milller. 1938. 2. Almost Like Being in Love. Mildred Bailey. 3. I Can't Get Started With You. Skinny Ennis, Hal Kemp. 4. Why Doesn't Somebody Tell Me These Things. Marian Hutton, Glenn Miller. 1938. 5. Blues in the Night. Johnny Mercer, Ella May Morris, Pied Pipers. 1944. 6. Is You Is or Is You Ain't My Baby. Ozzie Nelson. 7. Rainy Day. Leah Raye, Phil Harris. 1933. 8. From the Top of Your Head. Hal Kemp. 9. I Must Have That Man. Ben Selven. 1928. 10. Extraordinary Gal. Phil Harris. 1933. 11. The Lady's In Love With You. Tex Beneky, Glenn Miller. 1939. 12. At Your Beck and Call. Mildred Bailey. 13. All of Me. Paul Whiteman. 14. You Always Keep Me in Hot Water. Caroline Cotton, Bob Wills. 15. You're Driving Me Crazy. Ben Selven. 1930. 16. What Have You Got That Gets Me. Marian Hutton, Glenn Miller. 1938. 17. You're So Darn Charming. Bob Allen, Hal Kemp. 18. I'm Thinking Tonight of My Blue Eyes. Tex Ann. 19. Let's Put Out the Light and Go to Bed. Paul Whiteman
All poor, but no paupers: a Japanese perspective on the Great Divergence Professor Osamu Saito Abstract Ken Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence (2000), based mainly on Chinese evidence, argued that in the early modern period, the Asian standard of living was on a par with that of Europe and that market growth in East Asia was comparable to that in western Europe. The book has stimulated a major debate amongst economic historians and much progress has recently been made in cross-cultural comparisons of real wages. However, real differences between East and West cannot be properly understood unless household income, not just real wages, and income inequality, not just per-capita income, are compared; and due attention should be given, not only to product markets, but to factor markets as well. This lecture series examines these issues on the empirical basis of what Japan’s economic history can offer. The findings are not consistent with either Pomeranz’s account of East-West differences in living standards or with those presented in Bob Allen’s recent book.
All poor, but no paupers: a Japanese perspective on the Great Divergence. Professor Osamu Saito. Ken Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence (2000), based mainly on Chinese evidence, argued that in the early modern period, the Asian standard of living was on a par with that of Europe and that market growth in East Asia was comparable to that in western Europe. The book has stimulated a major debate amongst economic historians and much progress has recently been made in cross-cultural comparisons of real wages. However, real differences between East and West cannot be properly understood unless household income, not just real wages, and income inequality, not just per-capita income, are compared; and due attention should be given, not only to product markets, but to factor markets as well. This lecture series examines these issues on the empirical basis of what Japan’s economic history can offer. The findings are not consistent with either Pomeranz’s account of East-West differences in living standards or with those presented in Bob Allen’s recent book.
All poor, but no paupers: a Japanese perspective on the Great Divergence Professor Osamu Saito Ken Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence (2000), based mainly on Chinese evidence, argued that in the early modern period, the Asian standard of living was on a par with that of Europe and that market growth in East Asia was comparable to that in western Europe. The book has stimulated a major debate amongst economic historians and much progress has recently been made in cross-cultural comparisons of real wages. However, real differences between East and West cannot be properly understood unless household income, not just real wages, and income inequality, not just per-capita income, are compared; and due attention should be given, not only to product markets, but to factor markets as well. This lecture series examines these issues on the empirical basis of what Japan’s economic history can offer. The findings are not consistent with either Pomeranz’s account of East-West differences in living standards or with those presented in Bob Allen’s recent book.
All poor, but no paupers: a Japanese perspective on the Great Divergence Professor Osamu Saito Ken Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence (2000), based mainly on Chinese evidence, argued that in the early modern period, the Asian standard of living was on a par with that of Europe and that market growth in East Asia was comparable to that in western Europe. The book has stimulated a major debate amongst economic historians and much progress has recently been made in cross-cultural comparisons of real wages. However, real differences between East and West cannot be properly understood unless household income, not just real wages, and income inequality, not just per-capita income, are compared; and due attention should be given, not only to product markets, but to factor markets as well. This lecture series examines these issues on the empirical basis of what Japan’s economic history can offer. The findings are not consistent with either Pomeranz’s account of East-West differences in living standards or with those presented in Bob Allen’s recent book.
All poor, but no paupers: a Japanese perspective on the Great Divergence Professor Osamu Saito Ken Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence (2000), based mainly on Chinese evidence, argued that in the early modern period, the Asian standard of living was on a par with that of Europe and that market growth in East Asia was comparable to that in western Europe. The book has stimulated a major debate amongst economic historians and much progress has recently been made in cross-cultural comparisons of real wages. However, real differences between East and West cannot be properly understood unless household income, not just real wages, and income inequality, not just per-capita income, are compared; and due attention should be given, not only to product markets, but to factor markets as well. This lecture series examines these issues on the empirical basis of what Japan’s economic history can offer. The findings are not consistent with either Pomeranz’s account of East-West differences in living standards or with those presented in Bob Allen’s recent book.
Profitable Prophets (02) Bob Allen teaching from 2 Chronicles Ch. 34 v23-28 on "Huldah - Prophecy &&name; Confrontation". Outline: a) The last days of Judah: The royal line of the Kings of Judah - The social environment. b) The prophetess Huldah: Why Huldah? - The prophecy - Women in the Bible - Male and female. c) Prophecy and Confrontation: The issue of a creator - The question of evolution - The bottom line.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
