Podcasts about central park five

Five Black and Latino teenagers were wrongfully convicted of raping and brutally assaulting a white woman in 1989. The boys’ legal case gripped and divided the nation, and symbolized systemic injustices within the legal system for communities of color. All five men were exonerated over a decade later. Detroit Opera brings the Pulitzer Prize-winning opera The Central Park Five to audiences on May 16 and 18. Award-winning director Nataki Garrett talked about bringing this powerful piece to the stage, and why it’s so relevant for audiences right now. “I love that we're doing this opera in Detroit, which has a significant black population, because there are parts of this story that are a part of our collective consciousness, both through memory but also through experience,” Garrett told Stateside.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this excerpt from "Live with C#" Cecelia speaks with Conductor and Bassoonist Anthony Parnther who conducts Detroit Opera's production of "Central Park Five". He speaks a bit about how he got started in scoring, why he got involved with Detroit Opera's production and what he hopes the audience takes away from the production.

Running for coverage. A Russian journalist flees house arrest and a possible prison sentence, and escapes to France. She tells us leaving her loved ones behind was the only way to break free.Dishonourable discharges. Rae Timberlake has served their country in the U.S. Navy for 17 years. But as the Trump administration begins its removal of a thousand trans troops, they don't feel like their country is serving them.Out of office replies. I'll talk to Yukon Premier Ranj Pillai about his surprise resignation announcement; he tells us that, when it comes to his children, it's time to make up for lost time.Disaster aria. A new opera sets a horrendous case of wrongful conviction to music. The composer behind "The Central Park Five" tells us its themes have a whole new resonance right now.  I get where they're coming from. No one knows what to call people from Chelsea, Quebec -- and the mayor tells us the city's 150th anniversary is the perfect time for residents to decide how to identify themselves.  And, indubitably, unreservedly sorry, not sorry. A UK researcher reveals that the more uncommon and sesquipedalian vocabulary you utilize in an apology, the more sincere it will seem.As It Happens, the Friday edition. Radio that never cuts a long sorry short.

For once, Trump is held accountable for his lies. The five men known as the Central Park Five win a key victory in their defamation lawsuit against Trump as a federal Judge rules it can proceed. Dina Doll reports on this and the defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion against Newsmax that is headed to a jury. Qualia Life: Go to https://Qualialife.com/MISSTRIAL for up to 50% OFF and use code: MISSTRIAL at checkout for an additional 15% OFF Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane

CONTENT WARNING: This episode contains discussion of sexual violence.On the occasion of the lecture by Dr. Yusef Salaam of The Exonerated Five at Northampton Community College's Annual Humanities Keynote on April 15, we reviewed The Central Park Five, the 2012 documentary by Ken Burns, David McMahon, and Sarah Burns.Also check out: Conviction and exoneration (PBS)Is "Do the Right Thing" as vital and important as ever?CreditsHip Hop Movie Club is produced by your HHMCs JB, BooGie, and DynoWright. Theme music by BooGie. And remember: Don't hate...exonerate!Check us out:Our next live event is our HUSTLE & FLOW screening in 4K at the Frank Banko Alehouse Cinemas in Bethlehem, PA. Part of the Hip Hop Movie Club Film Series at SteelStacks.Buy ticketsCheck out our live event schedule and more at our Linktree.Hip Hop Movie Club on:FacebookInstagram ThreadsBluesky Website

Michigan hunting, fishing license fee hikes: What you'd pay under Whitmer budget proposal Michigan school leaders run through 'what ifs' as Trump tries to gut education department 'I awakened to the American Nightmare': Central Park Five's Yusef Salaam shares his story Marche du Nain Rouge returns to Detroit for 2025 with new twist: What to expect

Love the show? Have any thoughts? Click here to let us know!Start spreading the news—we're in New York this week! We begin with some of the city's dark history, including the devastating Triangle Shirtwaist Fire and the infamous Typhoid Mary. Then, Kenzie dives into the eerie hauntings of the House of Death in Greenwich Village, where even known skeptic and former resident Mark Twain reportedly had unexplainable, possibly paranormal, encounters. Next, Lauren unpacks the chilling legend of “The Cropsey” and its disturbing ties to real-life predator Andre Rand, whose crimes earned him the nickname the “Pied Piper of Staten Island.” From tragic history to terrifying hauntings, New York has no shortage of nightmares—so buckle up for a spooky ride!-If you or someone you know is in immediate danger as a result of domestic violence, call 911. For anonymous, confidential help, you can call the 24/7 National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 (SAFE) or chat with an advocate via the website.-Follow us on Social Media and find out how to support A Scary State by clicking on our Link Tree: https://instabio.cc/4050223uxWQAl--Have a scary tale or listener story of your own? Send us an email to ascarystatepodcast@gmail.com! We can't wait to read it!--Thinking of starting a podcast? Thinking about using Buzzsprout for that? Well use our link to let Buzzsprout know we sent you and get a $20 Amazon gift card if you sign up for a paid plan!https://www.buzzsprout.com/?referrer_id=1722892--Works cited!https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dq_0tJvFgEFuU1ZpZQ3E_LcuLc-RrTML8fSt9ILWb6k/edit?usp=sharing --Intro and outro music thanks to Kevin MacLeod. You can visit his site here: http://incompetech.com/. Which is where we found our music!

By Walt HickeyDouble feature today!Welcome to the Numlock Sunday edition.This week, I spoke to Alissa Wilkinson who is out with the brand new book, We Tell Ourselves Stories: Joan Didion and the American Dream Machine.I'm a huge fan of Alissa, she's a phenomenal critic and I thought this topic — what happens when one of the most important American literary figures heads out to Hollywood to work on the most important American medium — is super fascinating. It's a really wonderful book and if you're a longtime Joan Didion fan or simply a future Joan Didion fan, it's a look at a really transformative era of Hollywood and should be a fun read regardless.Alissa can be found at the New York Times, and the book is available wherever books are sold.This interview has been condensed and edited. All right, Alissa, thank you so much for coming on.Yeah, thanks for having me. It's good to be back, wherever we are.Yes, you are the author of We Tell Ourselves Stories: Joan Didion and the American Dream Machine. It's a really exciting book. It's a really exciting approach, for a Joan Didion biography and placing her in the current of American mainstream culture for a few years. I guess just backing out, what got you interested in Joan Didion to begin with? When did you first get into her work?Joan Didion and I did not become acquainted, metaphorically, until after I got out of college. I studied Tech and IT in college, and thus didn't read any books, because they don't make you read books in school, or they didn't when I was there. I moved to New York right afterward. I was riding the subway. There were all these ads for this book called The Year of Magical Thinking. It was the year 2005, the book had just come out. The Year of Magical Thinking is Didion's National Book Award-winning memoir about the year after her husband died, suddenly of a heart attack in '03. It's sort of a meditation on grief, but it's not really what that sounds like. If people haven't read it's very Didion. You know, it's not sentimental, it's constantly examining the narratives that she's telling herself about grief.So I just saw these ads on the walls. I was like, what is this book that everybody seems to be reading? I just bought it and read it. And it just so happened that it was right after my father, who was 46 at the time, was diagnosed with a very aggressive leukemia, and then died shortly thereafter, which was shocking, obviously. The closer I get to that age, it feels even more shocking that he was so young. I didn't have any idea how to process that emotion or experience. The book was unexpectedly helpful. But it also introduced me to a writer who I'd never read before, who felt like she was looking at things from a different angle than everyone else.Of course, she had a couple more books come out after that. But I don't remember this distinctly, but probably what happened is I went to some bookstore, The Strand or something, and bought The White Album and Slouching Towards Bethlehem off the front table as everyone does because those books have just been there for decades.From that, I learned more, starting to understand how writing could work. I didn't realize how form and content could interact that way. Over the years, I would review a book by her or about her for one publication or another. Then when I was in graduate school, getting my MFA in nonfiction, I wrote a bit about her because I was going through a moment of not being sure if my husband and I were going to stay in New York or we were going to move to California. They sort of obligate you to go through a goodbye to all that phase if you are contemplating that — her famous essay about leaving New York. And then, we did stay in New York City. But ultimately, that's 20 years of history.Then in 2020, I was having a conversation (that was quite-early pandemic) with my agent about possible books I might write. I had outlined a bunch of books to her. Then she was like, “These all sound like great ideas. But I've always wanted to rep a book on Joan Didion. So I just wanted to put that bug in your ear.” I was like, “Oh, okay. That seems like something I should probably do.”It took a while to find an angle, which wound up being Didion in Hollywood. This is mostly because I realized that a lot of people don't really know her as a Hollywood figure, even though she's a pretty major Hollywood figure for a period of time. The more of her work I read, the more I realized that her work is fruitfully understood as the work of a woman who was profoundly influenced by (and later thinking in terms of Hollywood metaphors) whether she was writing about California or American politics or even grief.So that's the long-winded way of saying I wasn't, you know, acquainted with her work until adulthood, but then it became something that became a guiding light for me as a writer.That's really fascinating. I love it. Because again I think a lot of attention on Didion has been paid since her passing. But this book is really exciting because you came at it from looking at the work as it relates to Hollywood. What was Didion's experience in Hollywood? What would people have seen from it, but also, what is her place there?The directly Hollywood parts of her life start when she's in her 30s. She and her husband — John Gregory Dunn, also a writer and her screenwriting partner — moved from New York City, where they had met and gotten married, to Los Angeles. John's brother, Nick Dunn later became one of the most important early true crime writers at Vanity Fair, believe it or not. But at the time, he was working as a TV producer. He and his wife were there. So they moved to Los Angeles. It was sort of a moment where, you know, it's all well and good to be a journalist and a novelist. If you want to support yourself, Hollywood is where it's at.So they get there at a moment when the business is shifting from these big-budget movies — the Golden Age — to the new Hollywood, where everything is sort of gritty and small and countercultural. That's the moment they arrive. They worked in Hollywood. I mean, they worked literally in Hollywood for many years after that. And then in Hollywood even when they moved back to New York in the '80s as screenwriters still.People sometimes don't realize that they wrote a bunch of produced screenplays. The earliest was The Panic in Needle Park. Obviously, they adapted Didion's novel Play It As It Lays. There are several others, but one that a lot of people don't realize they wrote was the version of A Star is Born that stars Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson. It was their idea to shift the Star is Born template from Hollywood entities to rock stars. That was their idea. Of course, when Bradley Cooper made his version, he iterated on that. So their work was as screenwriters but also as figures in the Hollywood scene because they were literary people at the same time that they were screenwriters. They knew all the actors, and they knew all the producers and the executives.John actually wrote, I think, two of the best books ever written on Hollywood decades apart. One called The Studio, where he just roamed around on the Fox backlot. For a year for reasons he couldn't understand, he got access. That was right when the catastrophe that was Dr. Doolittle was coming out. So you get to hear the inside of the studio. Then later, he wrote a book called Monster, which is about their like eight-year long attempt to get their film Up Close and Personal made, which eventually they did. It's a really good look at what the normal Hollywood experience was at the time: which is like: you come up with an idea, but it will only vaguely resemble the final product once all the studios get done with it.So it's, it's really, that's all very interesting. They're threaded through the history of Hollywood in that period. On top of it for the book (I realized as I was working on it) that a lot of Didion's early life is influenced by especially her obsession with John Wayne and also with the bigger mythology of California and the West, a lot of which she sees as framed through Hollywood Westerns.Then in the '80s, she pivoted to political reporting for a long while. If you read her political writing, it is very, very, very much about Hollywood logic seeping into American political culture. There's an essay called “Inside Baseball” about the Dukakis campaign that appears in Political Fictions, her book that was published on September 11, 2001. In that book, she writes about how these political campaigns are directed and set up like a production for the cameras and how that was becoming not just the campaign, but the presidency itself. Of course, she had no use for Ronald Reagan, and everything she writes about him is very damning. But a lot of it was because she saw him as the embodiment of Hollywood logic entering the political sphere and felt like these are two separate things and they need to not be going together.So all of that appeared to me as I was reading. You know, once you see it, you can't unsee it. It just made sense for me to write about it. On top of it, she was still alive when I was writing the proposal and shopping it around. So she actually died two months after we sold the book to my publisher. It meant I was extra grateful for this angle because I knew there'd be a lot more books on her, but I wanted to come at it from an angle that I hadn't seen before. So many people have written about her in Hollywood before, but not quite through this lens.Yeah. What were some things that you discovered in the course of your research? Obviously, she's such an interesting figure, but she's also lived so very publicly that I'm just super interested to find out what are some of the things that you learned? It can be about her, but it can also be the Hollywood system as a whole.Yeah. I mean, I didn't interview her for obvious reasons.Understandable, entirely understandable.Pretty much everyone in her life also is gone with the exception really of Griffin Dunn, who is her nephew, John's nephew, the actor. But other than that, it felt like I needed to look at it through a critical lens. So it meant examining a lot of texts. A lot of Didion's magazine work (which was a huge part of her life) is published in the books that people read like Slouching Towards Bethlehem and The White Album and all the other books. What was interesting to me was discovering (I mean, not “discovering” because other people have read it) that there is some work that's not published and it's mostly her criticism.Most of that criticism was published in the late '50s and the early '60s when she was living in New York City, working at Vogue and trying to make it in the literary scene that was New York at that time, which was a very unique place. I mean, she was writing criticism and essays for both, you know, like National Review and The Nation at the same time, which was just hard to conceive of today. It was something you'd do back then. Yeah, wild stuff.A lot of that criticism was never collected into books. The most interesting is that she'd been working at Vogue for a long time in various positions, but she wound up getting added to the film critic column at Vogue in, '62, I want to say, although I might have that date slightly off. She basically alternated weeks with another critic for a few years, writing that until she started writing in movies proper. It's never a great idea to be a critic and a screenwriter at the same time.Her criticism is fascinating. So briefly, for instance, she shared that column with Pauline Kael. Pauline Kael became well known after she wrote about Bonnie and Clyde. This was prior to that. This is several years prior to that. They also hated each other for a long time afterward, which is funny, because, in some ways, their style is very different but their persona is actually very similar. So I wonder about that.But in any case, even when she wasn't sharing the column with Pauline Kael, it was a literal column in a magazine. So it's like one column of text, she can say barely anything. She was always a bit of a contrarian, but she was actively not interested in the things that were occupying New York critics at the time. Things like the Auteur Theory, what was happening in France, the downtown scene and the Shirley Clark's of the world. She had no use for it. At some point, she accuses Billy Wilder of having really no sense of humor, which is very funny.When you read her criticism, you see a person who is very invested in a classical notion of Hollywood as a place that shows us fantasies that we can indulge in for a while. She talks in her very first column about how she doesn't really need movies to be masterpieces, she just wants them to have moments. When she says moments, she means big swelling things that happen in a movie that make her feel things.It's so opposite, I think, to most people's view of Didion. Most people associate her with this snobbish elitism or something, which I don't think is untrue when we're talking about literature. But for her, the movies were like entertainment, and entering that business was a choice to enter that world. She wasn't attempting to elevate the discourse or something.I just think that's fascinating. She also has some great insights there. But as a film critic, I find myself disagreeing with most of her reviews. But I think that doesn't matter. It was more interesting to see how she conceived of the movies. There is a moment later on, in another piece that I don't think has been republished anywhere from the New York Review of Books, where she writes about the movies of Woody Allen. She hates them. It's right at the point where he's making like Manhattan and Annie Hall, like the good stuff. She just has no use for them. It's one of the funniest pieces. I won't spoil the ending because it's hilarious, and it's in the book.That writing was of huge interest to me and hasn't been republished in books. I was very grateful to get access to it, in part because it is in the archives — the electronic archives of the New York Public Library. But at the time, the library was closed. So I had to call the library and have a librarian get on Zoom with me for like an hour and a half to figure out how I could get in the proverbial back door of the library to get access while the library wasn't open.That's magnificent. That's such a cool way to go to the archives because some stuff just hasn't been published. If it wasn't digitized, then it's not digitized. That's incredible.Yeah, it's there, but you can barely print them off because they're in PDFs. They're like scanned images that are super high res, so the printer just dies when you try to print them. It's all very fascinating. I hope it gets republished at some point because I think there's enough interest in her work that it's fascinating to see this other aspect of her taste and her persona.It's really interesting that she seems to have wanted to meet the medium where it is, right? She wasn't trying to literary-up Hollywood. I mean, LA can be a bit of a friction. It's not exactly a literary town in the way that some East Coast metropolises can be. It is interesting that she was enamored by the movies. Do you want to speak about what things were like for her when she moved out?Yeah, it is funny because, at the same time, the first two movies that they wrote and produced are The Panic in Needle Park, which is probably the most new Hollywood movie you can imagine. It's about addicts at Needle Park, which is actually right where the 72nd Street subway stop is on the Upper West Side. If people have been there, it's hard to imagine. But that was apparently where they all sat around, and there were a lot of needles. It's apparently the first movie supposedly where someone shoots up live on camera.So it was the '70s. That's amazing.Yes, and it launched Al Pacino's film career! Yeah, it's wild. You watch it and you're just like, “How is this coming from the woman who's about all this arty farty stuff in the movies.” And Play It As It Lays has a very similar, almost avant-garde vibe to it. It's very, very interesting. You see it later on in the work that they made.A key thing to remember about them (and something I didn't realize before I started researching the book)was that Didion and Dunn were novelists who worked in journalism because everybody did. They wrote movies, according to them (you can only go off of what they said. A lot of it is John writing these jaunty articles. He's a very funny writer) because “we had tuition and a mortgage. This is how you pay for it.”This comes up later on, they needed to keep their WGA insurance because John had heart trouble. The best way to have health insurance was to remain in the Writers Guild. Remaining in the Writers Guild means you had to have a certain amount of work produced through union means. They were big union supporters. For them this was not, this was very strictly not an auteurist undertaking. This was not like, “Oh, I'm gonna go write these amazing screenplays that give my concept of the world to the audience.” It's not like Bonnie and Clyding going on here. It's very like, “We wrote these based on some stories that we thought would be cool.”I like that a lot. Like the idea that A Star is Born was like a pot boiler. That's really delightful.Completely. It was totally taken away from them by Streisand and John Peters at some point. But they were like, “Yeah, I mean, you know, it happens. We still got paid.”Yeah, if it can happen to Superman, it can happen to you.It happens to everybody, you know, don't get too precious about it. The important thing is did your novel come out and was it supported by its publisher?So just tracing some of their arcs in Hollywood. Obviously, Didion's one of the most influential writers of her generation, there's a very rich literary tradition. Where do we see her footprint, her imprint in Hollywood? What are some of the ways that we can see her register in Hollywood, or reverberate outside of it?In the business itself, I don't know that she was influential directly. What we see is on the outside of it. So a lot of people were friends. She was like a famous hostess, famous hostess. The New York Public Library archives are set to open at the end of March, of Didion and Dunn's work, which was like completely incidental to my publication date. I just got lucky. There's a bunch of screenplays in there that they worked on that weren't produced. There's also her cookbooks, and I'm very excited to go through those and see that. So you might meet somebody there.Her account of what the vibe was when the Manson murders occurred, which is published in her essay The White Album, is still the one people talk about, even though there are a lot of different ways to come at it. That's how we think about the Manson murders: through her lens. Later on, when she's not writing directly about Hollywood anymore (and not really writing in Hollywood as much) but instead is writing about the headlines, about news events, about sensationalism in the news, she becomes a great media critic. We start to see her taking the things that she learned (having been around Hollywood people, having been on movie sets, having seen how the sausage is made) and she starts writing about politics. In that age, it is Hollywood's logic that you perform for the TV. We have the debates suddenly becoming televised, the conventions becoming televised, we start to see candidates who seem specifically groomed to win because they look good on TV. They're starting to win and rule the day.She writes about Newt Gingrich. Of course, Gingrich was the first politician to figure out how to harness C-SPAN to his own ends — the fact that there were TV cameras on the congressional floor. So she's writing about all of this stuff at a time when you can see other people writing about it. I mean, Neil Postman famously writes about it. But the way Didion does it is always very pegged to reviewing somebody's book, or she's thinking about a particular event, or she's been on the campaign plane or something like that. Like she's been on the inside, but with an outsider's eye.That also crops up in, for instance, her essays. “Sentimental Journeys” is one of her most famous ones. That one's about the case of the Central Park Five, and the jogger who was murdered. Of course, now, we're many decades out from that, and the convictions were vacated. We know about coerced confessions. Also Donald Trump arrives in the middle of that whole thing.But she's actually not interested in the guilt or innocence question, because a lot of people were writing about that. She's interested in how the city of New York and the nation perform themselves for themselves, seeing themselves through the long lens of a movie and telling themselves stories about themselves. You see this over and over in her writing, no matter what she's writing about. I think once she moved away from writing about the business so much, she became very interested in how Hollywood logic had taken over American public life writ large.That's fascinating. Like, again, she spends time in the industry, then basically she can only see it through that lens. Of course, Michael Dukakis in a tank is trying to be a set piece, of course in front of the Berlin Wall, you're finally doing set decoration rather than doing it outside of a brick wall somewhere. You mentioned the New York thing in Performing New York. I have lived in the city for over a decade now. The dumbest thing is when the mayor gets to wear the silly jacket whenever there's a snowstorm that says “Mr. Mayor.” It's all an act in so many ways. I guess that political choreography had to come from somewhere, and it seems like she was documenting a lot of that initial rise.Yeah, I think she really saw it. The question I would ask her, if I could, is how cognizant she was that she kept doing that. As someone who's written for a long time, you don't always recognize that you have the one thing you write about all the time. Other people then bring it up to you and you're like, “Oh, I guess you're right.” Even when you move into her grief memoir phase, which is how I think about the last few original works that she published, she uses movie logic constantly in those.I mean, The Year of Magical Thinking is a cyclical book, she goes over the same events over and over. But if you actually look at the language she's using, she talks about running the tape back, she talks about the edit, she talks about all these things as if she's running her own life through how a movie would tell a story. Maybe she knew very deliberately. She's not a person who does things just haphazardly, but it has the feeling of being so baked into her psyche at this point that she would never even think of trying to escape it.Fascinating.Yeah, that idea that you don't know what you are potentially doing, I've thought about that. I don't know what mine is. But either way. It's such a cool way to look at it. On a certain level, she pretty much succeeded at that, though, right? I think that when people think about Joan Didion, they think about a life that freshens up a movie, right? Like, it workedVery much, yeah. I'm gonna be really curious to see what happens over the next 10 years or so. I've been thinking about figures like Sylvia Plath or women with larger-than-life iconography and reputation and how there's a constant need to relook at their legacies and reinvent and rethink and reimagine them. There's a lot in the life of Didion that I think remains to be explored. I'm really curious to see where people go with it, especially with the opening of these archives and new personal information making its way into the world.Yeah, even just your ability to break some of those stories that have been locked away in archives out sounds like a really exciting addition to the scholarship. Just backing out a little bit, we live in a moment in which the relationship between pop culture and political life is fairly directly intertwined. Setting aside the steel-plated elephant in the room, you and I are friendly because we bonded over this idea that movies really are consequential. Coming out of this book and coming out of reporting on it, what are some of the relevances for today in particular?Yeah, I mean, a lot more than I thought, I guess, five years ago. I started work on the book at the end of Trump One, and it's coming out at the beginning of Trump Two, and there was this period in the middle of a slightly different vibe. But even then I watch TikTok or whatever. You see people talk about “main character energy” or the “vibe shift” or all of romanticizing your life. I would have loved to read a Didion essay on the way that young people sort of view themselves through the logic of the screens they have lived on and the way that has shaped America for a long time.I should confirm this, I don't think she wrote about Obama, or if she did, it was only a little bit. So her political writing ends in George W. Bush's era. I think there's one piece on Obama, and then she's writing about other things. It's just interesting to think about how her ideas of what has happened to political culture in America have seeped into the present day.I think the Hollywood logic, the cinematic logic has given way to reality TV logic. That's very much the logic of the Trump world, right? Still performing for cameras, but the cameras have shifted. The way that we want things from the cameras has shifted, too. Reality TV is a lot about creating moments of drama where they may or may not actually exist and bombarding you with them. I think that's a lot of what we see and what we feel now. I have to imagine she would think about it that way.There is one interesting essay that I feel has only recently been talked about. It's at the beginning of my book, too. It was in a documentary, and Gia Tolentino wrote about it recently. It's this essay she wrote in 2000 about Martha Stewart and about Martha Stewart's website. It feels like the 2000s was like, “What is this website thing? Why are people so into it?” But really, it's an essay about parasocial relationships that people develop (with women in particular) who they invent stories around and how those stories correspond to greater American archetypes. It's a really interesting essay, not least because I think it's an essay also about people's parasocial relationships with Joan Didion.So the rise of her celebrity in the 21st century, where people know who she is and carry around a tote bag, but don't really know what they're getting themselves into is very interesting to me. I think it is also something she thought about quite a bit, while also consciously courting it.Yeah, I mean, that makes a ton of sense. For someone who was so adept at using cinematic language to describe her own life with every living being having a camera directly next to them at all times. It seems like we are very much living in a world that she had at least put a lot of thought into, even if the technology wasn't around for her to specifically address it.Yes, completely.On that note, where can folks find the book? Where can folks find you? What's the elevator pitch for why they ought to check this out? Joan Didion superfan or just rather novice?Exactly! I think this book is not just for the fans, let me put it that way. Certainly, I think anyone who considers themselves a Didion fan will have a lot to enjoy here. The stuff you didn't know, hadn't read or just a new way to think through her cultural impact. But also, this is really a book that's as much for people who are just interested in thinking about the world we live in today a little critically. It's certainly a biography of American political culture as much as it is of Didion. There's a great deal of Hollywood history in there as well. Thinking about that sweep of the American century and change is what the book is doing. It's very, very, very informed by what I do in my day job as a movie critic at The New York Times. Thinking about what movies mean, what do they tell us about ourselves? I think this is what this book does. I have been told it's very fun to read. So I'm happy about that. It's not ponderous at all, which is good. It's also not that long.It comes out March 11th from Live Right, which is a Norton imprint. There will be an audiobook at the end of May that I am reading, which I'm excited about. And I'll be on tour for a large amount of March on the East Coast. Then in California, there's a virtual date, and there's a good chance I'll be popping up elsewhere all year, too. Those updates will be on my social feeds, which are all @alissawilkinson on whatever platform except X, which is fine because I don't really post there anymore.Alyssa, thank you so much for coming on.Thank you so much.Edited by Crystal Wang.If you have anything you'd like to see in this Sunday special, shoot me an email. Comment below! Thanks for reading, and thanks so much for supporting Numlock.Thank you so much for becoming a paid subscriber! Send links to me on Twitter at @WaltHickey or email me with numbers, tips or feedback at walt@numlock.news. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.numlock.com/subscribe

Listen to an interview with Pulitzer Prize-winning composer Anthony Davis. He'll appear at the University of Indianapolis for a series of free events on February 10 and 11.  The New York Times has called Davis one of the “greatest living composers.” Davis has received attention worldwide for his orchestral and chamber compositions, but he's best known for his work in opera, including his groundbreaking 1986 production X, the Life and Times of Malcolm X. In 2020, Davis received the Pulitzer Prize in music for his opera The Central Park Five.  Prior to achieving notoriety as a composer, Davis had a prolific career as a jazz pianist, recording with prominent jazz artists including Marion Brown, Oliver Lake, Leroy Jenkins, David Murray, Wadada Leo Smith, and more.

Envíanos un mensaje!En este episodio te hablo de uno de los casos criminales más conocidos y polémicos en la historia de los Estados Unidos. Este suceso fue conocido como el caso de los Cinco del Parque Central o Central Park Five como se le conoce en inglés. Aunque este caso es bien conocido hay un ángulo de este que si no lo conocías te va a sorprender.Fuentes de información y documentos adicionales disponibles en Patreon.Background Music: CO.AG MusicSi estás buscando un cambio de carrera o escalar al próximo nivel gerencial o ejecutivo, un buen resumé y buen perfil para LinkedIn será crucial. Los servicios de Career Branding son personalizados y conllevan una reunión telefónica para discutir la experiencia e identificar información que añada valor. Todo de manera confidencial. También trabajan resumés para el gobierno federal.  Comunícate con Career Branding al 787.300.7777 para más detalles o visita www.resumeprofesional.com.Este episodio también es traído a ustedes por Jabonera Don Gato. Los jabones Don Gato son hechos a mano, sin químicos dañinos ni detergentes. Elaborados con aceites naturales, esenciales y aromáticos, seguros para la piel. Pruébalos y siente la diferencia. Visítalos en jaboneradongato.com y utiliza el código "Crimepod" para obtener un 10% de descuento en tu compra.Puedes llamar a Fernando Fernández Investigador Privado y Forense con más de 17 años de experiencia a nivel local e internacional al 787-276-5619 o visítalo en: Fernando Fernandez PIEste episodio es traído a ustedes por Libros787.com. Ordena tus libros favoritos escritos por autores puertorriqueños desde la comodidad de tu casa. Utiliza el código promocional: CRIMEPODPR para que recibas envío gratuito en tu primera compra. Envíos a todas partes de Puerto Rico y Estados Unidos.Career Branding, Don Gato, FF & 787 Call to actionSupport the show

SLANDERTOWN is a podcast that dives into First Amendment slugfests. No beef too small, no lawsuit too petty. Dan talks to SLANDERTOWN blog contributor Angela Chung about Donald Trump's penchant for repeatedly defaming people (specifically, E. Jean Carroll and the Central Park Five) and what may happen next. Reading: https://www.slandertown.com/blog/trumptrilogy https://www.slandertown.com/blog/centralparkfive

Elon Musk wears out his welcome in Donald Trump's inner circle as he is accused of acting ‘like he's co-president'. Trump seeks ‘immediate recusal' of a judge in the Central Park Five defamation case. Mike Tyson slapped Jake Paul.  Host: Dr. Rashad Richey (@rashad_richey) Co-Host: Daria Rose *** SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE  ☞  https://www.youtube.com/IndisputableTYT FOLLOW US ON: FACEBOOK  ☞   https://www.facebook.com/IndisputableTYT TWITTER  ☞       https://www.twitter.com/IndisputableTYT INSTAGRAM ☞  https://www.instagram.com/IndisputableTYT Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

There are plenty of dos and don'ts when it comes to going out in New York City. Part of that comes down to what you're wearing. Doormen and bouncers are constantly trying to cultivate the right vibe inside the club, and to do so, they're going to judge you based on appearance. In the headlines on #TheUpdate this Tuesday, the men formerly known as the Central Park Five before they were exonerated filed a defamation lawsuit against Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. A Bronx man is accused of raping a 13-year-old boy in the stairwell of a public housing building after the pair met online, prosecutors said. And in Decision 2024, with two weeks to go until Election Day, Both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump see economic policy as their best chance to win Latino voters. But their approaches are very different. In an interview with Telemundo, Vice President Harris plans to highlight how her agenda would create more opportunities for Latino men — a strategy born out of roughly a dozen focus groups and polling. Former President Trump, the Republican nominee, is making his own outreach to Latinos by holding a roundtable with them in Doral, a Miami suburb. Meanwhile, In-person early voting kicks off across battleground Wisconsin, with former President Barack Obama and Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz hosting a rally in liberal Madison and Republicans holding events to encourage casting a ballot for Donald Trump before Election Day.

Listen in as Donny gives his "Brand Up" or "Brand Down" rating on McDonald's, Goldfish Crackers, the best country for food, Subway Weddings, most popular baby names, and more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

[SEGMENT 2-1] Observations Israel is at war with Iran; and who knows what happens next in that conflict All I know is Iran is in deep kimche, because supposedly Israel knocked out most of their defense systems. We are still sending money to Ukraine, but we have no updates on progress. The world is a mess. Have you seen the video where Trudeau sits down at a table, and China's president is looking at his phone and won't acknowledge him. The president of Brazil ignores him, as he tries to shake his hand.   Mitch McConnell is stepping down. Did you see him fall on a stage recently. He looks as bad as Biden Laura Loomer says the RINOs in the Senate want somebody who will do what McConnell did and work against Trump…        [SEGMENT 2-2] Trump the Central Park Five and OJ     I asked this question a while back, “What if Nicole Simpson were white?” Here's another question, “What if OJ were white?   If Nicole Brown-Simpson had been Black instead of white, the O.J. Simpson case would likely have been perceived very differently, both in the media and within American society. Speculating on this hypothetical scenario, there are a few key aspects that would shape how the trial might have unfolded in terms of public sentiment and racial dynamics.Racial Dynamics and Public Perception: The original O.J. Simpson case was already racially charged, as many Black Americans viewed Simpson as a symbol of triumph over systemic racism in the justice system, while many white Americans saw the trial as a clear case of guilt obscured by racial tension. Had Nicole been Black, the racial polarization may have shifted. Black and white communities might not have been as divided over Simpson's guilt or innocence, as the racial dimension that fueled such passionate reactions may not have existed in the same way.Media Coverage: The media played a significant role in shaping how the O.J. Simpson trial was perceived. Nicole Brown-Simpson's whiteness was central to how the case was framed, amplifying the notion of a Black man allegedly murdering a white woman, a narrative historically loaded with racialized fears and stereotypes. If Nicole were Black, the media may not have sensationalized the trial in the same way. The case might not have received the same level of attention, or the racial undertones would likely be different, potentially focusing more on issues within the Black community rather than interracial tensions.Race and Justice System Critique: The case spotlighted deep mistrust between Black Americans and the criminal justice system, with many believing Simpson was being unfairly targeted due to his race. If Nicole were Black, this critique of the system may have been less pronounced, as the racial dimension that fueled the "us vs. them" narrative might not have been as intense. The focus may have been more on domestic violence or celebrity culture than systemic racism.Historical Precedent: Historically, cases involving Black victims of crime, especially when committed by fellow Black individuals, have received less attention from the media and the public. It's possible that if Nicole had been Black, the case might not have reached the fever pitch of public interest that it did. Similarly, the reactions from both the defense and prosecution may have played out in a less racially charged environment.Some commentators and researchers have speculated on these hypothetical changes to the Simpson trial. For instance, in various discussions of race and media, analysts point to how white women victims often receive more sympathetic media portrayals and heightened public interest. This dynamic might have been different if Nicole had been Black, perhaps leading to less of a "racial trial of the century" moment and more of a celebrity-focused or gendered case. However, no significant academic work has tackled this exact hypothetical in depth. Still, the role of race in the justice system and media perceptions has been explored widely in other contexts. Authors like Patricia J. Williams and Ta-Nehisi Coates have written about how race impacts the narrative around criminal cases, especially when it involves white female victims and Black male defendants. This thought experiment is an extension of how deeply ingrained racial dynamics in America influence the interpretation of high-profile legal cases, especially those involving interracial conflict or violence.     Speculating on how the O.J. Simpson case would have unfolded if O.J. were white instead of Black introduces a fascinating exploration of race, celebrity, and the justice system. If Simpson had been white, several key aspects of the trial would likely have been dramatically different, particularly in how the media, the public, and the jury approached the case. 1. Public Perception and Racial Polarization One of the most defining features of the O.J. Simpson trial was the racial divide in how it was perceived. Black Americans largely viewed Simpson as a victim of systemic racism, while many white Americans saw it as a clear-cut case of guilt. If Simpson were white, this polarization may not have existed in the same way. The trial might have been less about race and more about the intersection of celebrity culture and domestic violence. Without the racial dimension, it is likely that Black communities wouldn't have rallied behind Simpson in the same way, and white Americans would not have perceived the trial as an example of a flawed justice system letting a guilty man go free based on racial issues. 2. Media Sensationalism The media played a huge role in portraying the case as a battle between racial justice and privilege. The dynamic of a famous Black man allegedly murdering his white ex-wife was key to the media frenzy. Had Simpson been white, the racial implications wouldn't have driven the narrative. Instead, the media might have focused more on Simpson's status as a celebrity or the brutal nature of the crime. Celebrity trials often attract media attention, but the racial tension added fuel to the fire in this case. Without it, the trial would likely have still been highly publicized, but the sensationalism would have centered on Simpson's fame and wealth rather than his race. 3. The Jury's Decision The racial composition of the jury was another critical element of the O.J. Simpson trial. In the actual case, the jury was predominantly Black, and race played a significant role in how they viewed the trial. If Simpson had been white, the jury's racial makeup would not have had the same implications, and the dynamics of the trial might have focused more on gender issues, such as domestic violence, rather than race. The defense's strategy, which leaned heavily on accusations of racism within the LAPD, particularly regarding Mark Fuhrman's testimony, would not have been as effective if Simpson were white. The defense might have been forced to focus more on evidence manipulation or police incompetence rather than race-based arguments, which could have led to a different outcome. 4. Race and the Justice System The O.J. Simpson trial came at a time when racial tensions in America, particularly between Black communities and the police, were at a boiling point. Just a few years after the Rodney King beating and the L.A. riots, the trial tapped into deep-seated frustrations within the Black community regarding police brutality and systemic racism. If Simpson had been white, it is possible that the case would not have become such a lightning rod for conversations about race in America. Speculation and Commentary There has been some commentary regarding how the case might have been different if O.J. Simpson were white. Though no large academic pieces tackle this hypothetical directly, some legal analysts and social commentators have suggested that the racial dynamics significantly influenced how the public, media, and legal teams approached the trial. If Simpson were white, the media focus would have likely shifted to Simpson's celebrity status, wealth, and fame, without the same focus on systemic racism or police misconduct. While it's difficult to point to specific sources that deeply speculate on this hypothetical, there have been discussions in broader analyses of the case that recognize the pivotal role race played in shaping the outcome and the broader narrative around the trial. Conclusion Had O.J. Simpson been white, the trial would likely have been less about racial injustice and more about celebrity privilege or domestic violence. The media would have framed the story differently, and the defense would not have been able to rely on accusations of systemic racism to the same extent. Without the racial polarization, the outcome of the trial might have shifted, and the case wouldn't have become the cultural phenomenon it was. The O.J. Simpson trial, as we know it, is inseparable from the racial tensions that defined it.    [SEGMENT 2-3] Crime stats 1   The EXPERTS reported that crime went down under Biden. Down SIGNIFICANTLY. Meanwhile, people like me look at the REAL information and found that major cities had NOT REPORTED to the FBI, which would undoubtedly alter the report. Yes, I used LOGIC AND COMMON SENSE, did the math…IN MY HEAD, then looked at all the reports of criminal activity and determined that STATISTICALLY, there is (1) no way Biden won the 2020 election, and (2) no way crime went DOWN!1.     Keep in mind, the same people reporting crimes stats are the ones telling you that…2.     Illegals are less violent than Americans And they are cost-positive to the economy Fat meat and greasy and cobras make good house pets!! Here's a supercut of the media feeding us Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-kevin-jackson-show--2896352/support.

In the latest episode of Club Shay Shay, Shannon Sharpe welcomes none other than Vice President Kamala Harris for an inspiring conversation filled with historic moments, personal reflections, and big dreams for the future. Vice President Harris opens up about her journey of groundbreaking "firsts," from becoming the first woman, Black, and Asian American U.S. Vice President to being the first female Attorney General of California. She shares memorable stories, including receiving the monumental call from President Biden that changed the trajectory of her career. The two dive into the realities of her day-to-day life, intense schedule, and dedication to staying connected with communities across the country. She also reminisces about her love of music, recounting a bucket list moment when Stevie Wonder sang her happy birthday. With only days left until Election Day, she reflects on the gravity of her role, her vision for the country, and the importance of mobilizing voters. This episode showcases Vice President Harris's resilience, humor, and commitment to making a lasting impact for future generations. Key issues and policy considerations affecting communities across the country are at the forefront of the conversation. They discuss essential topics, including workers' rights, corporate practices, and historical injustices that have disadvantaged Black communities. From Donald Trump's discriminatory landlord practices, his involvement in the Central Park Five case, and his racially charged birtherism against President Obama, they shift to contemporary issues facing marginalized communities. Vice President Harris speaks candidly about economic disparities, noting her focus on combating inflation, housing, and price gouging while supporting affordable housing and small business initiatives. She emphasizes the need for policies that protect Social Security, ensure accessible healthcare, and address health disparities affecting Black men, particularly in colon and prostate cancer screenings. With Election Day approaching, she stresses the significance of the upcoming choice, advocating for leaders dedicated to working and middle-class families over self-serving interests. Important topics like immigration reform come into focus as the conversation unfolds. Vice President Harris advocates for a secure yet humane immigration system, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach that allows individuals to earn their citizenship while effectively addressing border security. This perspective stands in stark contrast to the often divisive rhetoric seen during Trump's presidency. As the episode progresses, VP Harris critiques current political figures and highlights the urgent need for a new generation of leaders committed to real change, calling out the failures of the past. Don't miss this insightful episode as Vice President Kamala Harris shares her vision for a more inclusive future for America on Club Shay Shay!#volume #Herd #nightcap  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

HEADLINE/COMMUNITY NEWS: • Deadly E.coli outbreak linked to McDonald's has infected at least 75 people in 13 states • Central Park Five' members sue Trump for defamation after his debate comments on 1989 case • Kamala Harris rallies with Beyoncé and Willie Nelson in Texas Can We Talk?: • Trina Explains Why She Didn't Make Her Husband Sign A Prenup: 'He Can't Spend A Dime Without My Consent HOT TOPICS & WHATS TRENDING: • Grammy-winning rapper Lil Durk charged with orchestrating 2022 Los Angeles killing • Kendrick Lamar explains meaning behind Drake diss 'Not Like Us' • Queen Latifah And Missy Elliott Become First Rappers To Receive National Medal Of Arts

Barb McQuade hosts #SistersInLaw to look at the validity of Republican lawsuits challenges to the election, explain how they're using them to create an aura of legitimacy around future claims of election fraud, relay their progress in the courts, and share the reasons we should be confident in the system.  Then, the #Sisters break down the defamation suit against Trump brought by the exonerated Central Park Five and discuss why civil judgments seem more effective at holding MAGA accountable than criminal verdicts.  They also explore the free speech issues raised by Ruth Ben-Ghiat's cancellation by the Naval Academy and the difference between process and substance when it comes to the 1st Amendment. Check out Jill's New Politicon YouTube Show: Just The Facts Check out Kim's New Politicon Podcast: Justice By Design Get your #SistersInLaw MERCH at politicon.com/merch WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT Email: SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or Thread to @sistersInLaw.podcast Mentioned By The #Sisters: Ruth Ben-Ghiat's Substack From Kim on how courts are rejecting Trump's attacks on elections Broken Relationships Museum Kjartansson/The National- A Lot of Sorrow Get text updates from #SistersInLaw and Politicon.  Please Support This Week's Sponsors: Osea Malibu: Get 10% off your order of clean beauty products from OSEA Malibu, with free samples and free shipping on orders over $60, when you go to oseamalibu.com and use promo code: SISTERS OneSkin: Get 15% off OneSkin with the code: SISTERS at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod LolaVie: Get 15% off LolaVie with the code: SIL15 at https://www.lolavie.com/sil15 #lolaviepod Wild Grain:  Get $30 off and free croissants in every box when you start your subscription to delicious quick-bake artisanal pastries, pasta, and bread at wildgrain.com/sisters with promo code: SISTERS Get Barb's New Book:  Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America Get More From #SistersInLaw Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC | Civil Discourse Substack Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President | Just The Facts YouTube Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR | Unbound Newsletter | Justice By Design Podcast Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC

On September 10, 2024, in Philadelphia Pennsylvania, Attorney Alex Van Dyke, of famed legal firm, Kline & Specter, along with 67 million viewers tuned in to watch the Presidential debate between Vice President, Kamala Harris, and Donald Trump. What transpired that evening, would once again put the former Central Park Five, now known as the Exonerated Five, back in the spotlight. That night at the podium, Donald Trump relayed false information, stating that the Exonerated Five plead guilty to the assault and rape of the jogger and that she, in-fact, died of her injuries. Neither of these statements are true. In 1989, these five men, then teenagers, were arrested for the rape and assault of that woman. All five pled not guilty, yet were sentenced to years in prison. The victim of this infamous attack suffered horrific injuries, but she did survive. In 2002, with more conclusive DNA evidence, and a confession from the actual rapist, these five men were exonerated and their charges vacated. Fast forward 35 years, and the Exonerated Five have filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump. Listen in as we open this episode with a preamble from Attorney Bill Newman and then, Attorney Alex Van Dyke, from the Exonerated Fives' legal team, joins us for a first look at this new civil lawsuit against Donald Trump.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.serioustrouble.showFor all listeners, we have updates this week on Michael Avenatti, Aileen Cannon, Laura Loomer and Bill Maher. Our valued paying subscribers (thank you for your support!) will also hear about: the Central Park Five lawsuit against Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani being ordered to hand over assets to the election workers he defamed, FTX defendant Ryan Salame, who alleges (dubiously) that federal prosecutors double-crossed him and his girlfriend, and Ron DeSantis ordering Florida television stations to stop airing commercials for a pro-choice ballot measure.Upgrade your subscription at serioustrouble.show (if you haven't already) to get the full episode.

Biden calls for Trump to be "locked up" (1:00-6:00). One thing leads to another (7:00-18:00). I have no reluctance (18:00-35:00). Tim Walz missed the memo (35:00-40:00). Great journalism from CBS and Nora O'Donnell (42:00-47:00). Newsweek's hot takes (47:00-50:00). Here come the hit pieces (50:00-60:00). Nuzzi out at New York Magazine, trust in media hits new low, Central Park Five sue Trump (50:00-1:17:00).Zig responds to copout accusation by disrespectful producer and 538 has 51 / 49 on odds to win and the value of early voting data (1:17:00-1:30:00). The continued Russification of the NFL - Guardian Caps (1:30:00-2:00:00). Could LA DA release the Menendez brothers? (2:00:00-2:20:00).Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-death-of-journalism--5691723/support.

It's officially two weeks until Election Day, and SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk wants you to vote — for former President Donald Trump, obviously. In fact, Musk wants you to vote so badly that he says he's giving out $1 million a day to people in swing states who sign his petition supporting the rights to free speech and to bear arms. It's part of an effort to get more Republicans registered to vote. Except legal experts we spoke with — like Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin and UCLA election law professor Rick Hasen — say the whole scheme is likely illegal. Later in the show, NPR National Correspondent Sarah McCammon talks about where the white Evangelical vote stands after Roe. v. Wade was overturned.And in headlines: A major election watcher says Pennsylvania's Senate race is now a ‘tossup,' the group of men formerly known as the Central Park Five filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, and the Biden Administration says it's proposing a new rule to make private health insurers cover more contraceptives.Show Notes:Check out Sarah's reporting – https://tinyurl.com/234aj3vrSubscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday 

Tuesday, October 22nd, 2024Today, the employee from the Florida Department of Health that sent letters to television stations to stop airing Amendment 4 ads says Ron DeSantis directed him to do so and he resigned in protest before sending more; the Central Park Exonerated Five have filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump; Donald stages a photo op at McDonalds; an analysis finds that Trump's plan would render Social Security insolvent in six short years; more fact checking on Trump's FEMA comments Monday; Attorney General Kris Mayes has secured a guilty plea in the fraudulent elector scheme; and Allison delivers your Good News. Here is my new ad for #HarrisWalz. My story never gets easier to tell, but everything is on the line this election. Please watch and share - x.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1847296099398361455Smalls cat food is made with protein packed recipes made with ingredients – delivered right to your door. To get 50% off your first order, plus free shipping, go to Smalls.com/DAILYBEANS and use promo code DAILYBEANS at checkout. Stories:Central Park Five sue Donald Trump for jogger case remarks made at presidential debate (AP News)Trump's Social Security plan would hasten insolvency, lead to bigger benefits cuts, analysis finds (CBS News)Attorney General Mayes Announces Plea Deal in Cochise County Election Interference Case (azag.gov)Fact check: Trump repeats debunked lies about FEMA's hurricane response during North Carolina visit (Daniel Dale | CNN)Trump evasive about raising Pa. minimum wage while pretending to work at McDonald's in Bucks County (The Philadelphia Inquirer)Harris Social Media Toolkit Harris Campaign Social Media Toolkit (kamalaharris.com)Give to the Kamala Harris Presidential Campaign Kamala Harris — Donate via ActBlue (MSW Media's Donation Link)See What's On Your Ballot, Check Your Voter Registration, Find Your Polling Place, Discover Upcoming Debates In Your Area, And Much More! Vote411.orgCheck Your Voter Registration!  Vote.orgHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsYou can almost always find a transcript at: the-daily-beans.simplecast.com Learn More About Rep. Morelle - NY-25 (house.gov)Ohio Voter Information (ohiosos.gov)Rural Dog Rescue (ruraldogrescue.com)Texas Voter Information (votetexas.gov) Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill https://muellershewrote.substack.comhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

Donald Trump is calling for mass deportations if he's elected. USA TODAY national reporter Lauren Villagran breaks down the costs and logistical hurdles to his plan. Trump faces a new lawsuit – this time accusing him of defaming the men who were exonerated after being labeled the “Central Park Five.”TV personality Dr. Phil testified Monday on behalf of Robert Roberson, a man convicted of murdering his 2-year-old daughter Nikki in 2002.Several life-saving pediatric cancer drugs are in shortage and advocates say that corporate greed is partly to blame. The debate over when pregnancy begins is causing confusion and access problems for women who are seeking birth control. USA Today national correspondent Elizabeth Weis talks about the war over contraceptives.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Tuesday briefing: Harris campaigns with Cheney; Central Park Five; Fall City shooting; student loans; NBA schedule; and moreRead today's briefing.If you're not a subscriber, click here to start.

Blinken arrives in Israel as US looks to renew cease-fire efforts after the killing of Hamas leader. Central Park Five members sue Trump for defamation after his debate comments on 1989 case. Putin hosts BRICS summit to show West it can't West it can't keep Russia off global stage.

Shanin Specter, attorney for the exonerated "Central Park Five" joins Michael to discuss the defamation suit filed against former President Trump for what he said about them in a September 2024 presidential debate. The group of men were accused and convicted of raping and beating a woman in New York City in 1989. The convictions were vacated in 2002 after someone else confessed to the crime. Specter says had Trump immediately retracted and apologized after his comments in the debate with VP Kamala Harris, they would not have filed the lawsuit. Original air date 22 October 2024.

GOP early voting causes Dem meltdown, favors Trump—Nate Silver has bad news for Harris (00:00) Olivia Nuzzi out at New York Magazine after RFK Jr relationship: Rising debates (08:10) Why Daniel Penny could be found innocent in death of Jordan Neely: Rising debates (20:37) Central Park Five sue Donald Trump for defamation (31:45) Hezbollah vs Israel: Violence and war keep going despite US pleas for calm (43:33) Has FTC Chair Lina Khan overstepped her power, again? (54:30) Abercrombie & Fitch ex-CEO Mike Jeffries arrested on sex trafficking charges (01:01:54) Kamala Harris leaning on Liz Cheney to get out the vote (01:10:08) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Queens state assemblyman Zohran Mamdani announces his run for mayor of New York City. Plus, members of the Central Park Five file a defamation lawsuit against former President Trump. And finally, WNYC's Michael Hill talks with reporters Brigid Bergin and Michelle Bocanegra for a breakdown of six ballot proposals New York City voters will weigh in on on Election Day.

Mark Dreyfus cáo buộc phe đối lập và đảng Xanh chính trị hóa Gaza. Donald Trump bị Central Park Five kiện vì tội phỉ báng. Khoảng 12.000 nhà lãnh đạo môi trường đã tụ họp tại Colombia để đánh giá cam kết của thế giới trong việc giải quyết tình trạng đa dạng sinh học đang giảm mạnh.

Mark Dreyfus accuses the Opposition and Greens of politicising Gaza; Donald Trump sued for defamation by the Central Park Five; and, in sport, the AFLW to play in Darwin this week for the historic Indigenous Round.

Today's West Coast Cookbook & Speakeasy Podcast for our especially special Daily Special, Tarrytown Chowder Tuesdays is now available on the Spreaker Player!Starting off in the Bistro Cafe, Georgia judges are taking on the Trump-controlled State Election Board and throwing out all of their last minute rule changes before the election to benefit Trump.Then, on the rest of the menu, the Central Park Five alleged in a federal lawsuit that Trump falsely claimed they pleaded guilty to the 1989 attack; a MAGA Arizona official who refused to certify the 2022 election, plead guilty to failing to perform her duty as an election officer; and, courts in Michigan and North Carolina rejected attempts by Republicans to disqualify the ballots of overseas military voters.After the break, we move to the Chef's Table where Moldova narrowly voted to secure a path toward EU membership after accusing Russia of interference; and, victims of Brazil's worst environmental disaster took their case for compensation to a UK court.All that and more, on West Coast Cookbook & Speakeasy with Chef de Cuisine Justice Putnam.Bon Appétit!The Netroots Radio Live Player​Keep Your Resistance Radio Beaming 24/7/365!“As I ate the oysters with their strong taste of the sea and their faint metallic taste that the cold white wine washed away, leaving only the sea taste and the succulent texture, and as I drank their cold liquid from each shell and washed it down with the crisp taste of the wine, I lost the empty feeling and began to be happy and to make plans.”-- Ernest Hemingway "A Moveable Feast"Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/west-coast-cookbook-speakeasy--2802999/support.

Len Berman and Michael Riedel speak with Shanin Specter about the defamation suit they are bringing against Donald Trump over comments he's made about them. Shanin discusses the comments made by Trump and what he is looking to accomplish with this lawsuit.

Today on America in the Morning   Harris & Trump Battleground Campaigns With just two weeks before Election Day, both candidates are focusing on the battleground states, with Kamala Harris trying to win over swing state Republicans while Donald Trump visited storm-bruised North Carolina. Correspondent Jennifer King reports.    Historic Early Voting More Americans are casting their ballot in the Presidential election in record numbers as the early voting period opens in more states. Correspondent Clayton Neville reports.     Washington State Shooting A shooting in a Seattle, Washington area home has left five people dead. Pamela Furr reports the alleged gunman – a teenager - is in custody.    Central Park Five Sue Trump Donald Trump faces a new lawsuit, this one from New York's Central Park Five, over defamatory remarks made by the Republican nominee for president. Correspondent Julie Walker reports.     Roberson Won't Testify A Texas man on death row whose execution was halted in the final minutes last week won't testify to lawmakers as planned. Correspondent Haya Panjwani reports.    SCOTUS Says No To Michael Cohen The Supreme Court is saying no to a bid by former Donald Trump ‘fixer' Michael Cohen to hold the former president responsible for his being jailed. Correspondent Jackie Quinn reports.     Latest On The Trump & Harris Campaigns The Presidential candidates are hitting the swing states with just weeks to go until the November 5th election. Correspondent Clayton Neville has the latest from the campaign trail.    Investigating the Israel Potential Attack Plans Leak The Biden administration is deeply concerned after a reported leak of US classified documents about Israel's potential military planning for a retaliatory strike against Iran.  Correspondent Jackie Quinn reports.    The Florida Abortion TV Ad Case Court documents reveal that top attorneys for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis penned the cease-and-desist letters sent by the Sunshine State's Health Department to TV stations threatening criminal prosecution for airing abortion rights ads. The details from correspondent Sue Aller.     New Details On The Houston Helicopter Crash As the National Transportation Safety Board investigates a deadly night-time helicopter crash in Houston, a local TV station is reporting that the aviation obstruction lights at the top of the radio tower toppled by the chopper have a history of not working. Correspondent Jennifer King reports - Audio courtesy KTRK.    Cuba Remains Powerless Many Cubans are heading into a fifth day without electricity, following a complete failure of the Communist island's aging power grid. Correspondent Donna Warder reports.    Latest In The Middle East The U.S. military has confirmed its advanced anti-missile system sent to Israel is now operational. THAAD, or the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense System, is able to intercept ballistic missiles.     Penny Trial Starting The trial for former Marine Daniel Penny, charged with choking a man to death in the New York City subway is getting underway. Correspondent Julie Walker reports.     Tech News Harvard researchers have trained their new A-I program dubbed CHIEF to read images and detect cancer cells, with amazing results. Here's Chuck Palm with today's tech report.     Finally   The bad news keeps piling on for disgraced music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, with seven new lawsuits being filed against the musician. Correspondent Margie Szaroleta reports.    Country music now has three new names in their Hall of Fame. Kevin Carr has the details. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A US envoy called for stronger enforcement of UN resolution 1701, which ended the Israel-Hezbollah war in 2006. We'll tell you why members of the “Central Park Five” filed suit against former President Donald Trump today. Texas death row inmate Robert Roberson may testify before the state's House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. New research shows a spike in infant mortality in the US. Plus, change is on the horizon for the Girl Scouts of the USA. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

While stumping for former President Donald Trump, businessman Elon Musk announced he will give away $1 million each day to registered voters in battleground states to sign his petition. Some election law experts said the sweepstakes could violate laws against paying people to register. Vice President Kamala Harris is on a swing through three Rust Belt battleground states in one day—Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. She joined GOP former congresswoman Liz Cheney to appeal to Republican voters who are against Trump. Trump surveyed Hurricane Helene damage in Asheville, North Carolina, and pledged support for local communities. He then held a rally in Greenville before addressing faith leaders in Concord. The men formerly known as the Central Park Five before their exoneration filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump. The group accused the former president of making “false and defamatory statements” about them during the presidential debate.  ⭕️Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

While stumping for Trump, Elon Musk announced he will give away one million dollars each day to registered voters in battleground states to sign his petition. Some election law experts said the sweepstakes could violate laws against paying people to register.Vice President Harris is on a swing through three Rust Belt battleground states in one day — Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. She joined GOP former Congresswoman Liz Cheney to appeal to Republican voters who are against Trump.Trump surveyed Hurricane Helene damage in Asheville, North Carolina, and pleaded support for the local communities. He then held a rally in Greenville before addressing faith leaders in Concord.The men formerly known as the Central Park Five before their exoneration filed a defamation lawsuit against former President Trump. The group accused Trump of making “false and defamatory statements” during the presidential debate about them killing an individual and pleading guilty to the crime.

This is the 1010 WINS 4pm All Local.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports the Central Park Five sues Donald Trump for 'defamatory' remarks.

Hello!A quick note before we start: We recorded this as we always do on Tuesday for an early Wednesday release. The last part of the show focuses on what at the time was a wishy-washy and evasive response from Kamala Harris when asked about what Trump and Vance were doing to Haitian residents in Springfield, Ohio. Since then, Harris has come out and called their attacks a “crying shame” and likened it to Trump's demonization of the Central Park Five. We decided to keep the section in the show because while it's great that Harris did finally address it, I (Jay) still find it interesting that she chose to liken it to well-worn things she's already talked about, but decline to say anything positive about immigrants or immigration at all. This defensiveness is what we were responding to and while I think the tone we reached would've been muted a bit, I still think the logic is sound and relevant. Other than that, we talked about how we now view the “fascism debate” in light of these disgusting attacks on a specific, vulnerable population who already is seeing daily bomb threats at schools, and we talked a bit about the latest assassination attempt on Donald Trump's life. Enjoy! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit goodbye.substack.com/subscribe

OA1068 We begin with a quick review of some of the stranger legal issues raised in this week's Presidential debate, including such mysteries as whether it is legal to murder babies upon delivery and the factual guilt of the Central Park Five 22 years after they were exonerated by DNA evidence and a third-party confession. In our main story, we review the chaos that the Supreme Court's legalization of Presidential crime is already causing in Donald Trump's hush-money case and discuss the relative merits of pushing his sentencing back until after the November election. Finally, Matt drops a footnote to explain an overlooked legal story in this week's news involving a remarkably rare grant of a common defense motion. Filings from People v. Trump (NYCourts website) SDNY Judge Hellerstein's order denying Trump's notice of removal (9/3/24) Justice Merchan's order continuing Trump's sentencing hearing to November 26, 2024 (9/6/24) If you'd like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

When Zig predicts it right he lets you know about it and this episode contains multiple stories where Zig called it as few others saw it and turned out to be right on target. It starts with a night of missed opportunities as Trump fumbled the ball all over the field. Yes the moderators were biased and nobody fact-checked Harris but every time an opening for Trump to do real damage presented - he dropped the ball. There will be few if any other opportunities like last night the rest of the way (1:00-57:00). The media rush to declare Harris the winner (57:00-1:08:00). The Taylor Swift endorsement comes and Zig thinks they misplayed the card (1:08:00-1:15:00). If the election were today (1:15:00-1:18:00). CNN anchors are shocked to learn Harris' position on free gender affirming care (1:20:00-1:23:00). A 1995 clip the entire country should see (1:23:00-1:28:00). The cheetah plays the black spots card and the media and the Dolphins follow (1:30:00-1:45:00). Zig revisits an older prediction about NIL with the help of Livvy Dunne (1:45:00-2:01:00).Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-death-of-journalism--5691723/support.

This week, Donny sits down with his long time friend and civil rights activist, the Reverend Al Sharpton. Reverend Sharpton, fresh off of his appearance at the 2024 DNC, sits down for an in-depth discussion about his speech at the DNC, the 2024 presidential race and what Kamala Harris has to do to keep the momentum going. Sharpton, who hosts Politics Nation, weekends at 5:00 pm ET on MSNBC, also discusses why he wanted to speak at the DNC and what it meant to him to be there with Reverend Jesse Jackson and 4 members of the exonerated Central Park Five. Be sure to check out the On Brand with Donny Deutsch YouTube page. There you will find all of Donny's conversations in video form. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hosts Christina Greer and Katie Honan discuss Mayor Eric Adams' low profile at the DNC in Chicago, the so-called Central Park Five's powerful appearance there, and why it's good that Beryoncé didn't show up after all. They also dig into the city's surge in COVID cases, the latest death of a detainee at Rikers and, speaking of Central Park, RFK Jr.'s bizarre shaggy bear story.

The morning after the 2024 Democratic Convention closed with a dazzling acceptance speech from Kamala Harris. Ken Fong joins Ken for a week's end review. Harris is the first woman of color in history to receive a party's nomination for President of the United States.      Kemp's Substack Article became the theme of their talk, rooted in Abraham's Inaugural Address from 1861 when he appealed to “the better angels of our nature.” They compare and contrast the RNC with the DNC. The Republican's dystopian theme - “this country is going to hell” - will be remembered as a stark contrast with the Democrats by claiming “a future and a hope” and by calling for freedom from the unAmerican blueprint of Project 2025. Kemp says, “The DNC is an appeal to the better angels of our nature.” They discuss the poignant comments of Frank Schaeffer - the “atheist who believes in God” - on the presidential contest. The son of the famed Christian apologist Francis Schaeffer, Frank Jr. predicts utter disaster if Donald Trump wins. The two Ken's hit the highlights of the week - Joe Biden's passing of the baton to Harris. Michelle Obama's lightning bolt of a speech riveted everyone in the packed arena and the millions of us who tuned in. “Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those ‘Black jobs'?” she said. The surprise appearance of the Central Park Five reminded us of Trump's efforts to have these innocent men executed. So many more. Adam Kinsinger. Gabby Gifford. Republican Mayor John Giles. Oprah Winfrey. Doug Emhoff. Kamala's sister, Maya. Tim Walz's rousing acceptance speech as his son Gus celebrated through his tears with irrepressible joy. And finally, the nominee herself, Kamala Harris accepted the nomination to the roar of the crowd. “America, let us show each other - and the world - who we are. And what we stand for. Freedom. Opportunity. Compassion. Dignity. Fairness. And endless possibilities.”Become a Patron | Ken's Substack Page | Asian America the Ken Fong PodcastSupport the Show.

On this week's episode of 'The Sunday Show with Jonathan Capehart': Kamala's momentum. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz look to build on the successful Democratic convention by announcing a huge fund-raising haul days before they are set to hit the road and less than two weeks before the first mail-in ballots are sent out.  Rep. Maxine Waters of California joins me to talk about post-DNC campaign strategy. Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee discusses how the Harris – Walz ticket momentum is impacting critical down ballot races and Democratic efforts to keep control of the Senate. And my super-sized Sound Off panel of former Rep. Donna Edwards, former Rep. Joe Walsh, Brendan Buck and Maria Teresa Kumar look at how Democrats are belittling Trump, and getting under his skin.  All that and more on “The Sunday Show with Jonathan Capehart.” 

Suzanne Morphew var 49 år gammel, mor til to piger og hustru, da hun forsvandt under mystiske omstændigheder fra sit hjem i Colorado i maj 2020. Hendes ægtemand Barry Morphew blev senere tiltalt for drabet, selvom Suzanne stadig var savnet. Først i september 2023 dukkede resterne af hendes lig op i en overfladisk grav 80 kilometer væk.Sagen har fået massiv opmærksomhed i USA, hvor den generelle stemning er, at 'the husband did it', og forventningen er, at sagen mod Barry Morphew bliver genoptaget snart. Hans forsvarsadvokat er danske Jane Fisher-Byrialsen, der både kæmper for at bevise, at anklagemyndigheden tager fejl, og at der er taget feje midler i brug for at få ham dømt.Jane Fisher-Byrialsen har netop specialiseret sig i at kæmpe mod beskidte tricks og korruption i det amerikanske retssystem. Hun har været forsvarer i The Central Park Five-sagen og for den danske pædagogstuderende Malthe Thomsen, der blev manipuleret til at give en falsk tilståelse og havnede i det berygtede Rikers Island-fængsel i New York.I dagens særafsnit med Jane Fisher-Byrialsen, som bor og arbejder i USA, taler vi om, hvad der ifølge hende er galt med det amerikanske retssystem, hvorfor hun bliver ved med at kæmpe, og om der findes mennesker, hun ikke ville forsvare. Og så går vi tæt på sagen om drabet på Suzanne Morphew, som har optaget Jane Fisher-Byrialsen de seneste år, og som formentlig er lige på tærsklen til at kulminere i en dramatisk retssag.Assisterende klip: Anders EskeMusik: Bensound

This week we talk about assassination attempts, presidential drop-outs, and October Surprises.We also discuss election narratives, the frictions of age, and brief attempts at unity messaging.Recommended Book: The Day the World Stops Shopping by JB MacKinnonTranscriptOn October 7 of 2016, The Washington Post released a video from 2005 in which Presidential Candidate Donald Trump bragged about how you can get away with sexually assaulting women if you're famous.That same day, Wikileaks released transcripts of three paid speeches given by Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton to banking giant Goldman Sachs as part of a larger bundle of divulgences from the hacked personal Gmail account of her campaign chairman, John Podesta—these speeches were pretty controversial as they were very well paid—she earned $675,000 in speaking fees from Goldman for the appearances, and fellow Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders lambasted her for the apparent conflict of interest this payout implied.Also on October 7, 2016, mere hours before that tape was released and those talks were leaked, Trump publicly claimed that the Central Park Five—a group of black men who were wrongly convicted of assault and rape in 1989, and who were later exonerated by DNA evidence and a confession from the actual perpetrator—Trump claimed they were guilty, which was a silly and to some, quite offensive thing to say, but it also seemed to gesture at the candidate's ignorance, at minimum, and according to some responses to this statement, at least, his possible racism, as well.So October 7 of 2016 was a pretty big day in terms of political divulgences, and it's considered to be one of the most prominent modern aggregations of what are, in US politics, often called October Surprises.The term October Surprise was coined by former President Ronald Reagan's campaign manager during the run-up to the 1980 presidential election in reference to fears that a last-minute deal negotiated by incumbent president, and Reagan's competitor in the race, Jimmy Carter, to get American hostages in Iran freed could net Carter enough votes to win re-election, despite many other variables operating against him.News reports were abuzz over these negotiations, so the narrative leaning in the President's favor could tilt things against Reagan, and his campaign manager was thus concerned that this bit of news, which was outside of his control, part of a spiral of larger events, would drop like a bomb on his campaign maneuverings, upending everything and completely changing the nature of the race, if it were to happen.That ended up not being the case, as Iran's leaders eventually notified their counterparts in the US that they wouldn't be releasing anyone until after the election, but this sort of last-minute narrative change-up had occurred in US elections before, including then-National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger saying, at a press conference, that he believed the Vietnam War would end soon, just twelve days before the 1972 election, which is thought to have helped Nixon win another term in office, and—also on October 7, but in 1964—one of then-President Johnson's top aides was arrested for engaging in homosexual acts with another man at a DC YMCA, which seemed likely to tip the scales against his campaign, as that was a big no-no at the time, but then, just a week later, hardliners in the Soviet Union booted Nikita Khrushchev from power, the Labour Party narrowly took over the UK government, and China conducted its first nuclear weapons test; all of which pushed that YMCA incident from the news and rebalanced the election in various ways.These sorts of last-minute surprises—last-minute because US presidential elections occur in early November, and these things seem to land like clockwork sometime in October, give or take a week—abound throughout US history, and though they usually only have a small or moderate impact on the final vote, in some cases they've been so dramatic, surprising, or paradigm-shifting they've completely upended expectations and seemingly changed the course of history.What I'd like to talk about today are two recent narrative change-ups in the ongoing US election, which will culminate with a vote this November, both of which have the potential to dramatically influence the outcome of the election, and who ultimately occupies the White House early next year.—It feels like I've been doing a lot of US-centric news lately, and though that's not intentional, and a trend I intend to defy in the coming weeks, there have been two potentially historic storylines playing out in US politics in recent weeks that I believe justify explanation and analysis; in part because they are so historic and unusual, and in part because they seem likely to define the narrative of the presidential race over the next 100 days or so between now and the November 5 vote.Of course, I say that knowing full well I could end up eating crow, acting, today, as if these are defining moments, when in reality either more dramatic and seemingly historic stuff could happen in the next three months-ish, or they moments could be set aside and largely forgotten in mere weeks, voter attention refocused on other things, like the actual policies being proposed by the two major parties in this race.There are good arguments for both eventualities, as the communication environment in which this election is playing out is novel in many ways, and the people involved and the things they stand for, and the larger global context in which they're operating, are also quite bizarre by historical standards.So these two stories are, I think, important to understand, as they could shape the path the rest of the race takes, and the moves both Republicans and Democrats, up and down the ballot, make in the coming months, which in turn will influence happenings globally in all sorts of important ways.But it could also be that life takes over, other stuff takes precedent, and folks mostly just vote along party lines as has tended to be increasingly the case these past handful of elections—we'll see how that goes.In the meantime, though, let's talk about the apparent attempted assassination of former President and current Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, and the seeming deterioration of current President Joe Biden's mental and physical health, the resultant calls from within his own party for him to step aside and let someone else run in his stead, and the decision he announced just a few days ago to step aside and let his party select a new candidate.On July 13 of this year, 2024, Trump was at a campaign tour stop in Butler, Pennsylvania, up on stage, presenting his speech, when a 20-year-old man named Thomas Crooks shot at him, firing eight rounds from an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle from a rooftop about 400 feet, which is about 120 meters, away from the stage.One of the bullets seemed to clip Trump's ear, and others hit members of the audience, one of whom was killed, and two others were critically wounded.A Secret Service sniper killed Crooks right after he took those shots, and Trump was surrounded by Secret Service agents moments after he was hit, briefly emerging from their huddle to raise his fist and shout "fight, fight, fight," before being hustled away from the stage.Some of the photos of the shooting and the aftermath quickly became famous, and a few of them are already considered to be historic, including several that show Trump, still bloody, pumping his fist, seemingly defiant and even victorious, from within the protective embrace of his Secret Service team, an American flag waving in the background—even commentators who don't like Trump have publicly said he looks pretty badass in these photos.And that general sense of badassery has been played up by the Trump campaign since the shooting. The Republican National Convention was just days after that campaign stop, and several attendees wore fake ear bandages, mimicking the one worn by the former-President, and many political analysts went ahead and called the election for Trump, citing the significance of surviving an assassination attempt, especially during a race between two elderly men, both of whom have been struggling to demonstrate their youthful vigor and favorably contrast themselves to their opponent.In the wake of the shooting, several big name donors committed money to Trump's campaign, including Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, and an array of Silicon Valley bigwigs, like the founders of Andreessen Horowitz, which is the most prominent venture capital firm in California.This wave of new support, from big donors and small, allowed Trump to out-raise Biden for the month for the first time in this election cycle.The campaign also signaled it may lean into a unity message, rather than what's become Trump's more combative, aggressive tact, which seemed likely to help him scoop up some on-the-fence voters, and possibly even some centrist Democrats who were increasingly concerned about Biden as the face of their party—though at the RNC event, Trump named further-right Ohio Senator, and author of bestselling book, Hillbilly Elegy, JD Vance as his VP, which is being seen as a doubling-down on aggression, not a balancing, moderating move, on Trump's part, and the scripted unity speech he gave, which used a lot of religious, "Jesus rising from the dead" language, alongside some gestures at the country coming together in the wake of violence, pretty quickly derailed into a somewhat rambling series of attacks against Trump's perceived enemies—so that approach, at least for the moment, is not being seen as a serious path for Trump and his team.On the other side of the political fence, current President Biden has long faced calls to step down, mostly because of his advanced age and what that age portends: he's already 81 years old, and he'll be 82 in late November, shortly after the upcoming election.People are living longer these days, and enjoying more of those years healthfully and productively, but Biden has had a speech impediment his entire life, which, as an older man, has at times made it seem like he's not as with-it as his fellow candidates—fairly or unfairly—and the frictions and scars of simply having lived a long, long time seem to be catching up with him, as well, and some fairly high-profile stumbles and mis-speakings, alongside caught-on-camera missteps and other signs of age and possible not-wellness, have amplified calls for him to step aside and allow someone younger to lead the Democrat's ticket in November.These calls were a not insignificant component of his opponents' campaign in the 2020 election, but they ticked up several notches following what's generally considered to be a disastrous debate, for Biden, in late-June of this year.The debate rules were in some ways stacked in Biden's favor, as there wouldn't be a studio audience for Trump to play off of, which is considered to be a strength of his debate style, and the candidates' microphones would be muted when it wasn't their turn to speak, which was meant to help temper Trump's tendency to go way over time, and speak over his opponent.Despite those seeming advantages, though, from the moment he walked onto the debate stage, Biden looked and seemed...unwell. His face was kind of drooping, his eyes looked uncanny and surprised, his words seems to tumble over each other, not in his typical fashion, influenced by his speech impediment, but in a confused, rambling, at times disjointed and not-well-seeming way.Even die-hard supporters of Biden began to question his ability to serve another term following that debate, and while most analysts pointed out that Trump's statements were riddled with lies, he did present those lies mostly intelligibly, while Biden, though mostly sticking to the truth, had trouble communicating much of anything, his delivery and overall visage suggesting that he's not okay, and if that's where he is now, where will he be in another several months, much less several years, if he were to take office for another four?Those long-simmering concerns about his age surged into a full-on rolling boil from that point forward, and higher-ups in the Democratic Party started to call for Biden to step aside, some of them probably due to concerns about their own races, his unpopularity—which is ticking upward, according to recent polls—impacting their electoral outlook, and others because they worried about Trump being elected, not on his own strengths necessarily, but because Biden had become toxic due to his stumbles, and the general, and seemingly growing sense that he's just not up to the job anymore, because of the impacts of age.As of the morning of Sunday, July 21, 39 Democratic congresspeople had overtly called for Biden to drop out, 23 had publicly expressed concerns about Biden, which is a lighter-weight way to say the same, basically, and 7 had said it's Biden's choice—though to be clear, Biden had said he's not dropping out, over and over again, so the folks who said it's his choice, following that clear declaration, seemed to be, in some cases at least, playing both sides, as they stating their support for him while leaving the door open for him to change his mind at some point in the future.57 congresspeople, in contrast, were saying Biden should stay in the race, which is fewer than had said he should drop out, overtly or subtly; though a lot of people were apparently expressing concerns behind closed doors, and the wave of anonymous sources talking to reporters on the matter, telling stories about his various fumbles and their election-related worries, reinforced the supposition that there are more people hoping he steps back than not, including a lot of top-tier donors, it's just that many of them are concerned about their role within the party if they express those concerns publicly.Then, in the early afternoon that same day, Biden's team released a statement from the President saying that he would be withdrawing from the 2024 election, followed shortly thereafter by a message indicating he was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris to replace him.Biden is apparently sick with COVID at the moment and is expected to speak on the matter sometime this week, once he's able to do so without coughing and rasping, but it's possible this news was released in this way, in writing rather than live and on camera, because it was just a truly difficult decision for someone who—according to his political career and bio, or the public-facing version of those things presented by his campaign, at least—tended to focus on sticking it out and persevering when faced with doubters, which in this case would have meant holding out and remaining the Democratic candidate, despite all the factors working against him.This represents an historic shift in the election, though, as no US presidential candidate has ever dropped out this close to the vote, and he's the first to ever drop out after winning his party's primaries.What happens now is thus up in the air, but the outline being shared by Democratic leaders as of the day I'm recording this seems to be that they'll hold some kind of lightning-fast election to see who replaces Biden on the ticket—possibly as part of an effort to avoid the mistake they made with Hillary Clinton, party higher-ups pushing too hard to favor one of their own who's turn it was, basically, over the candidates the voters actually wanted—though there's only about a month in which to figure out what that looks like, set it up, allow folks to decide to run and figure out campaign strategies, and then actually hold a vote; which is a lot, and that process could be chaotic, and it could result in fracturing within the Democratic Party, as folks might go negative against each other, despite guidelines telling them not to, and voters might not like it if their chosen person doesn't win, and they're then told to cast their lot in the actual presidential election with someone they voted against in this mini-, lightning-fast primary.At the moment, current VP Harris seems to have the lion's share of her party's support: as of the day I'm recording this, 179 democratic leaders, out of 286 congresspeople and governors, have publicly endorsed her candidacy, alongside other big names in the party like the Clintons, and prominent former presidential candidates, like current transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg.Right now, though, it's a big unknown who will ultimately take up the mantle of the Democratic party's presidential electee, and that makes things more difficult for the Democrats, because of those aforementioned potential issues with unity and clarity, but it also makes things trickier for the Trump campaign, as they can't be certain who they're running against, and some reports suggest the whole campaign has been optimized to compete against Biden, whereas now Trump is the oldest-ever presidential candidate for a major US political party, and many of the criticisms they were planning to level against Biden can be leveled against him, instead.The assassination attempt on Trump is still a variable here, too, as it seems to have rallied Republicans around him in a big way, but whether or not that will translate to larger support beyond existing die-hards is a big question mark.Important to note, too, is that while assassination attempts of presidents in the US are rare in modern history, thankfully, so we don't have tons of data as to how they influence election outcomes, the assumed consequence of this one, namely, supporting Trump's election bid, might not be the one we actually get.The attempted killing of President Reagan in 1981 seems to have bumped his numbers about 8% in the months that followed, but earlier assassination attempts of former-President Teddy Roosevelt and George Wallace didn't win them their bids for the office, and the larger context of the election and would-be electee seem to matter more, statistically, than the attempt, itself, when it comes to polling changes.Similarly, it may be that the Democrats are able to leverage Biden's decision to drop out, and the elevation of someone else from their party to the position of would-be president, could help drive a new, exciting narrative: that of a veteran statesman stepping down for the good of his party and the country, and new, younger blood taking up that mantle, fighting against another member of the old guard who himself would never consider stepping down.It's also important to remember, though, as I mentioned earlier, that this is all happening months before the election, and there's a chance these won't be the most important and dramatic stories shaping the narrative by the time we reach November; these July surprises could be replaced by October surprises, which upend the table once more, leaving everything chaotic and confusing right before votes are cast.So while these seem like very big deals right now, and they're dominating headlines, and will almost certainly be historically relevant, we may be in for a lot more planned and unplanned election-impacting divulgences and happenings in the months to come.Show Noteshttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-17/trump-shooting-3d-model-of-showground-rally-site/104104418https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/20/us/politics/trump-vance-michigan.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/20/us/politics/secret-service-trump-shooting.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/21/us/politics/trump-biden-fundraising.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/18/us/politics/elon-musk-trump.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/17/co-founders-of-silicon-valley-venture-capital-firm-back-trump-presidential-bidhttps://www.newyorker.com/science/medical-dispatch/doctors-are-increasingly-worried-about-bidenhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/20/us/politics/trump-harris-strategy.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/21/us/politics/biden-harris-nomination.htmlhttps://elections2024.thehill.com/projects/biden-drop-out/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/steve-kornacki-biden-pressure-party-can-get-wrong-rcna162783https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7982f2a0-42af-40a3-938e-8512c2ce8689_1338x755.pnghttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/democrats-are-gaming-post-biden-options-remains-insistent-remain-race-rcna162857https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/21/us/politics/biden-replace-harris.htmlhttps://www.npr.org/2016/10/15/498085611/wikileaks-claims-to-release-hillary-clintons-goldman-sachs-transcriptshttps://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/history-october-surprise-180960741/https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprisehttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/07/22/us/biden-harris-trump-news-election This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit letsknowthings.substack.com/subscribe

Patriot Coach Bill Belichick is in a serious relationship with a 23-year-old woman. She lives with him. Mark interviewed Best Selling Author Ann Coulter: Mark and Ann discussed Trump derangement syndrome. Ann believes the Central Park Five were guilty. Biden has one thing in his favor he's the incumbent.

Mark and Ann discussed Trump derangement syndrome. Ann believes the Central Park Five were guilty. Biden has one thing in his favor, he's the incumbent.