Podcast appearances and mentions of ken mccarthy

To hear the full episode and gain access the entire archive of deep historical research, subscribe to American Exception on Patreon!   Internet pioneer Ken McCarthy joins us to discuss his two books on the anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist foreign policies of John and Robert Kennedy.   Check out: 'JFK and RFK's Secret Battle Against Zionist Extremism' 'John F. Kennedy Anti-Imperialist: His Character and Intentions Revealed in Five Speeches and One Telegram' Brasscheck TV

Journalist Norman Soloman discusses the coverup about Biden's mental health, popularity and viability; his careerism and the failures of the Democratic Party. Plus how the media sells war and how liberal Zionism is a myth. Then Ken McCarthy and Aaron Good discuss JFK, who killed him, the JFK files and his fight with Israel. They also talk about the politics of RFK Jr. Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include "War Made Easy," "Made Love, Got War," and "War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of its Military Machine." Ken McCarthy is the author of "JFK and RFK's Secret Battle Against Zionist Extremism: The Documentary Evidence," and :John F. Kennedy Anti-Imperialist: His Character and Intentions Revealed in Five Speeches and One Telegram." Aaron Good is a political scientist and historian, the host of American Exception Podcast and the author of 'American Exception: Empire and the Deep State.'

On the landmark finale for Beat the Big Guys, Sandy chats with Ken McCarthy (Tivoli, NY) about his latest book How the Web Won which he says "reveals many previously untold details behind the dramatic emergence of the World Wide Web and how it came along just in time to thwart the last step of Bill Gates' plan for permanent domination of all the world's personal computers."

They say that those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. This is why we are releasing this podcast focused on what happened in hospitals during the "pandemic." Ken McCarthy is the author of "What the Nurses Saw," and today he reveals the systemic issues in patient care that occurred during the time of COVID-19—from unethical changes in the standards of care for patients to the unprepared staff and unhelpful hospital hierarchy to incentives for the use of ventilators and for labeling deaths as covid-related.   It played out like a horror show instead of health care, according to Ken. And anyone who dared to call out what was happening was censored or had their license revoked or were publicly shamed. It was a blatant attack on free speech. Ken boldly reminds us of what happened only four or five years ago and explains why this all matters now.   Visit Ken's website: What The Nurses Saw Become a member of the Weston A. Price Foundation at westonaprice.org Check out our sponsors: Optimal Carnivore and Black Lotus Shilajit

Dr. Gary Null provides a commentary on "Universal  Healthcare"       Universal Healthcare is the Solution to a Broken Medical System Gary Null, PhD Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For over 50 years, there has been no concerted or successful effort to bring down medical costs in the American healthcare system. Nor are the federal health agencies making disease prevention a priority. Regardless whether the political left or right sponsors proposals for reform, such measures are repeatedly defeated by both parties in Congress. As a result, the nation's healthcare system remains one of the most expensive and least efficient in the developed world. For the past 30 years, medical bills contributing to personal debt regularly rank among the top three causes of personal bankruptcy. This is a reality that reflects not only the financial strain on ordinary Americans but the systemic failure of the healthcare system itself. The urgent question is: If President Trump and his administration are truly seeking to reduce the nation's $36 trillion deficit, why is there no serious effort to reform the most bloated and corrupt sector of the economy? A key obstacle is the widespread misinformation campaign that falsely claims universal health care would cost an additional $2 trillion annually and further balloon the national debt. However, a more honest assessment reveals the opposite. If the US adopted a universal single-payer system, the nation could actually save up to $20 trillion over the next 10 years rather than add to the deficit. Even with the most ambitious efforts by people like Elon Musk to rein in federal spending or optimize government efficiency, the estimated savings would only amount to $500 billion. This is only a fraction of what could be achieved through comprehensive healthcare reform alone. Healthcare is the largest single expenditure of the federal budget. A careful examination of where the $5 trillion spent annually on healthcare actually goes reveals massive systemic fraud and inefficiency. Aside from emergency medicine, which accounts for only 10-12 percent of total healthcare expenditures, the bulk of this spending does not deliver better health outcomes nor reduce trends in physical and mental illness. Applying Ockham's Razor, the principle that the simplest solution is often the best, the obvious conclusion is that America's astronomical healthcare costs are the direct result of price gouging on an unimaginable scale. For example, in most small businesses, profit margins range between 1.6 and 2.5 percent, such as in grocery retail. Yet the pharmaceutical industrial complex routinely operates on markup rates as high as 150,000 percent for many prescription drugs. The chart below highlights the astronomical gap between the retail price of some top-selling patented pharmaceutical medications and their generic equivalents. Drug Condition Patent Price (per unit) Generic Price Estimated Manufacture Cost Markup Source Insulin (Humalog) Diabetes $300 $30 $3 10,000% Rand (2021) EpiPen Allergic reactions $600 $30 $10 6,000% BMJ (2022) Daraprim Toxoplasmosis $750/pill $2 $0.50 150,000% JAMA (2019) Harvoni Hepatitis C $94,500 (12 weeks) $30,000 $200 47,000% WHO Report (2018) Lipitor Cholesterol $150 $10 $0.50 29,900% Health Affairs (2020) Xarelto Blood Thinner $450 $25 $1.50 30,000% NEJM (2020) Abilify Schizophrenia $800 (30 tablets) $15 $2 39,900% AJMC (2019) Revlimid Cancer $16,000/mo $450 $150 10,500% Kaiser Health News (2021) Humira Arthritis $2,984/dose $400 $50 5,868% Rand (2021) Sovaldi Hepatitis C $1,000/pill $10 $2 49,900% JAMA (2021) Xolair Asthma $2,400/dose $300 $50 4,800% NEJM (2020) Gleevec Leukemia $10,000/mo $350 $200 4,900% Harvard Public Health Review (2020) OxyContin Pain Relief $600 (30 tablets) $15 $0.50 119,900% BMJ (2022) Remdesivir Covid-19 $3,120 (5 doses) N/A $10 31,100% The Lancet (2020) The corruption extends far beyond price gouging. Many pharmaceutical companies convince federal health agencies to fund their basic research and drug development with taxpayer dollars. Yet when these companies bring successful products to market, the profits are kept entirely by the corporations or shared with the agencies or groups of government scientists. On the other hand, the public, who funded the research, receives no financial return. This amounts to a systemic betrayal of the public trust on a scale of hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Another significant contributor to rising healthcare costs is the widespread practice of defensive medicine that is driven by the constant threat of litigation. Over the past 40 years, defensive medicine has become a cottage industry. Physicians order excessive diagnostic tests and unnecessary treatments simply to protect themselves from lawsuits. Study after study has shown that these over-performed procedures not only inflate costs but lead to iatrogenesis or medical injury and death caused by the medical  system and practices itself. The solution is simple: adopting no-fault healthcare coverage for everyone where patients receive care without needing to sue and thereby freeing doctors from the burden of excessive malpractice insurance. A single-payer universal healthcare system could fundamentally transform the entire industry by capping profits at every level — from drug manufacturers to hospitals to medical equipment suppliers. The Department of Health and Human Services would have the authority to set profit margins for medical procedures. This would ensure that healthcare is determined by outcomes, not profits. Additionally, the growing influence of private equity firms and vulture capitalists buying up hospitals and medical clinics across America must be reined in. These equity firms prioritize profit extraction over improving the quality of care. They often slash staff, raise prices, and dictate medical procedures based on what will yield the highest returns. Another vital reform would be to provide free medical education for doctors and nurses in exchange for five years of service under the universal system. Medical professionals would earn a realistic salary cap to prevent them from being lured into equity partnerships or charging exorbitant rates. The biggest single expense in the current system, however, is the private health insurance industry, which consumes 33 percent of the $5 trillion healthcare budget. Health insurance CEOs consistently rank among the highest-paid executives in the country. Their companies, who are nothing more than bean counters, decide what procedures and drugs will be covered, partially covered, or denied altogether. This entire industry is designed to place profits above patients' lives. If the US dismantled its existing insurance-based system and replaced it with a fully reformed national healthcare model, the country could save $2.7 trillion annually while simultaneously improving health outcomes. Over the course of 10 years, those savings would amount to $27 trillion. This could wipe out nearly the entire national debt in a short time. This solution has been available for decades but has been systematically blocked by corporate lobbying and bipartisan corruption in Washington. The path forward is clear but only if American citizens demand a system where healthcare is valued as a public service and not a commodity. The national healthcare crisis is not just a fiscal issue. It is a crucial moral failure of the highest order. With the right reforms, the nation could simultaneously restore its financial health and deliver the kind of healthcare system its citizens have long deserved. American Healthcare: Corrupt, Broken and Lethal Richard Gale and Gary Null Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For a nation that prides itself on being the world's wealthiest, most innovative and technologically advanced, the US' healthcare system is nothing less than a disaster and disgrace. Not only are Americans the least healthy among the most developed nations, but the US' health system ranks dead last among high-income countries. Despite rising costs and our unshakeable faith in American medical exceptionalism, average life expectancy in the US has remained lower than other OECD nations for many years and continues to decline. The United Nations recognizes healthcare as a human right. In 2018, former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon denounced the American healthcare system as "politically and morally wrong." During the pandemic it is estimated that two to three years was lost on average life expectancy. On the other hand, before the Covid-19 pandemic, countries with universal healthcare coverage found their average life expectancy stable or slowly increasing. The fundamental problem in the U.S. is that politics have been far too beholden to the pharmaceutical, HMO and private insurance industries. Neither party has made any concerted effort to reign in the corruption of corporate campaign funding and do what is sensible, financially feasible and morally correct to improve Americans' quality of health and well-being.   The fact that our healthcare system is horribly broken is proof that moneyed interests have become so powerful to keep single-payer debate out of the media spotlight and censored. Poll after poll shows that the American public favors the expansion of public health coverage. Other incremental proposals, including Medicare and Medicaid buy-in plans, are also widely preferred to the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare mess we are currently stuck with.   It is not difficult to understand how the dismal state of American medicine is the result of a system that has been sold out to the free-market and the bottom line interests of drug makers and an inflated private insurance industry. How advanced and ethically sound can a healthcare system be if tens of millions of people have no access to medical care because it is financially out of their reach?  The figures speak for themselves. The U.S. is burdened with a $41 trillion Medicare liability. The number of uninsured has declined during the past several years but still lingers around 25 million. An additional 30-35 million are underinsured. There are currently 65 million Medicare enrollees and 89 million Medicaid recipients. This is an extremely unhealthy snapshot of the country's ability to provide affordable healthcare and it is certainly unsustainable. The system is a public economic failure, benefiting no one except the large and increasingly consolidated insurance and pharmaceutical firms at the top that supervise the racket.   Our political parties have wrestled with single-payer or universal healthcare for decades. Obama ran his first 2008 presidential campaign on a single-payer platform. Since 1985, his campaign health adviser, the late Dr. Quentin Young from the University of Illinois Medical School, was one of the nation's leading voices calling for universal health coverage.  During a private conversation with Dr. Young shortly before his passing in 2016, he conveyed his sense of betrayal at the hands of the Obama administration. Dr. Young was in his 80s when he joined the Obama campaign team to help lead the young Senator to victory on a promise that America would finally catch up with other nations. The doctor sounded defeated. He shared how he was manipulated, and that Obama held no sincere intention to make universal healthcare a part of his administration's agenda. During the closed-door negotiations, which spawned the weak and compromised Affordable Care Act, Dr. Young was neither consulted nor invited to participate. In fact, he told us that he never heard from Obama again after his White House victory.   Past efforts to even raise the issue have been viciously attacked. A huge army of private interests is determined to keep the public enslaved to private insurers and high medical costs. The failure of our healthcare is in no small measure due to it being a fully for-profit operation. Last year, private health insurance accounted for 65 percent of coverage. Consider that there are over 900 private insurance companies in the US. National Health Expenditures (NHE) grew to $4.5 trillion in 2022, which was 17.3 percent of GDP. Older corporate rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans argue that a single-payer or socialized medical program is unaffordable. However, not only is single-payer affordable, it will end bankruptcies due to unpayable medical debt. In addition, universal healthcare, structured on a preventative model, will reduce disease rates at the outset.    Corporate Democrats argue that Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a positive step inching the country towards complete public coverage. However, aside from providing coverage to the poorest of Americans, Obamacare turned into another financial anchor around the necks of millions more. According to the health policy research group KFF, the average annual health insurance premium for single coverage is $8,400 and almost $24,000 for a family. In addition, patient out-of-pocket costs continue to increase, a 6.6% increase to $471 billion in 2022. Rather than healthcare spending falling, it has exploded, and the Trump and Biden administrations made matters worse.    Clearly, a universal healthcare program will require flipping the script on the entire private insurance industry, which employed over half a million people last year.  Obviously, the most volatile debate concerning a national universal healthcare system concerns cost. Although there is already a socialized healthcare system in place -- every federal legislator, bureaucrat, government employee and veteran benefits from it -- fiscal Republican conservatives and groups such as the Koch Brothers network are single-mindedly dedicated to preventing the expansion of Medicare and Medicaid. A Koch-funded Mercatus analysis made the outrageous claim that a single-payer system would increase federal health spending by $32 trillion in ten years. However, analyses and reviews by the Congressional Budget Office in the early 1990s concluded that such a system would only increase spending at the start; enormous savings would quickly offset it as the years pass. In one analysis, "the savings in administrative costs [10 percent of health spending] would be more than enough to offset the expense of universal coverage."    Defenders of those advocating for funding a National Health Program argue this can primarily be accomplished by raising taxes to levels comparable to other developed nations. This was a platform Senator Bernie Sanders and some of the younger progressive Democrats in the House campaigned on. The strategy was to tax the highest multimillion-dollar earners 60-70 percent. Despite the outrage of its critics, including old rank-and-file multi-millionaire Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, this is still far less than in the past. During the Korean War, the top tax rate was 91 percent; it declined to 70 percent in the late 1960s. Throughout most of the 1970s, those in the lowest income bracket were taxed at 14 percent. We are not advocating for this strategy because it ignores where the funding is going, and the corruption in the system that is contributing to exorbitant waste.    But Democratic supporters of the ACA who oppose a universal healthcare plan ignore the additional taxes Obama levied to pay for the program. These included surtaxes on investment income, Medicare taxes from those earning over $200,000, taxes on tanning services, an excise tax on medical equipment, and a 40 percent tax on health coverage for costs over the designated cap that applied to flexible savings and health savings accounts. The entire ACA was reckless, sloppy and unnecessarily complicated from the start.    The fact that Obamacare further strengthened the distinctions between two parallel systems -- federal and private -- with entirely different economic structures created a labyrinth of red tape, rules, and wasteful bureaucracy. Since the ACA went into effect, over 150 new boards, agencies and programs have had to be established to monitor its 2,700 pages of gibberish. A federal single-payer system would easily eliminate this bureaucracy and waste.    A medical New Deal to establish universal healthcare coverage is a decisive step in the correct direction. But we must look at the crisis holistically and in a systematic way. Simply shuffling private insurance into a federal Medicare-for-all or buy-in program, funded by taxing the wealthiest of citizens, would only temporarily reduce costs. It will neither curtail nor slash escalating disease rates e. Any effective healthcare reform must also tackle the underlying reasons for Americans' poor state of health. We cannot shy away from examining the social illnesses infecting our entire free-market capitalist culture and its addiction to deregulation. A viable healthcare model would have to structurally transform how the medical economy operates. Finally, a successful medical New Deal must honestly evaluate the best and most reliable scientific evidence in order to effectively redirect public health spending.    For example, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Obama healthcare adviser, observed that AIDS-HIV measures consume the most public health spending, even though the disease "ranked 75th on the list of diseases by personal health expenditures." On the other hand, according to the American Medical Association, a large percentage of the nation's $3.4 trillion healthcare spending goes towards treating preventable diseases, notably diabetes, common forms of heart disease, and back and neck pain conditions. In 2016, these three conditions were the most costly and accounted for approximately $277 billion in spending. Last year, the CDC announced the autism rate is now 1 in 36 children compared to 1 in 44 two years ago. A retracted study by Mark Blaxill, an autism activist at the Holland Center and a friend of the authors, estimates that ASD costs will reach $589 billion annually by 2030. There are no signs that this alarming trend will reverse and decline; and yet, our entire federal health system has failed to conscientiously investigate the underlying causes of this epidemic. All explanations that might interfere with the pharmaceutical industry's unchecked growth, such as over-vaccination, are ignored and viciously discredited without any sound scientific evidence. Therefore, a proper medical New Deal will require a systemic overhaul and reform of our federal health agencies, especially the HHS, CDC and FDA. Only the Robert Kennedy Jr presidential campaign is even addressing the crisis and has an inexpensive and comprehensive plan to deal with it. For any medical revolution to succeed in advancing universal healthcare, the plan must prioritize spending in a manner that serves public health and not private interests. It will also require reshuffling private corporate interests and their lobbyists to the sidelines, away from any strategic planning, in order to break up the private interests' control over federal agencies and its revolving door policies. Aside from those who benefit from this medical corruption, the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree with this criticism. However, there is a complete lack of national trust that our legislators, including the so-called progressives, would be willing to undertake such actions.    In addition, America's healthcare system ignores the single most critical initiative to reduce costs - that is, preventative efforts and programs instead of deregulation and closing loopholes designed to protect the drug and insurance industries' bottom line. Prevention can begin with banning toxic chemicals that are proven health hazards associated with current disease epidemics, and it can begin by removing a 1,000-plus toxins already banned in Europe. This should be a no-brainer for any legislator who cares for public health. For example, Stacy Malkan, co-founder of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, notes that "the policy approach in the US and Europe is dramatically different" when it comes to chemical allowances in cosmetic products. Whereas the EU has banned 1,328 toxic substances from the cosmetic industry alone, the US has banned only 11. The US continues to allow carcinogenic formaldehyde, petroleum, forever chemicals, many parabens (an estrogen mimicker and endocrine hormone destroyer), the highly allergenic p-phenylenediamine or PBD, triclosan, which has been associated with the rise in antibiotic resistant bacteria, avobenzone, and many others to be used in cosmetics, sunscreens, shampoo and hair dyes.   Next, the food Americans consume can be reevaluated for its health benefits. There should be no hesitation to tax the unhealthiest foods, such as commercial junk food, sodas and candy relying on high fructose corn syrup, products that contain ingredients proven to be toxic, and meat products laden with dangerous chemicals including growth hormones and antibiotics. The scientific evidence that the average American diet is contributing to rising disease trends is indisputable. We could also implement additional taxes on the public advertising of these demonstrably unhealthy products. All such tax revenue would accrue to a national universal health program to offset medical expenditures associated with the very illnesses linked to these products. Although such tax measures would help pay for a new medical New Deal, it may be combined with programs to educate the public about healthy nutrition if it is to produce a reduction in the most common preventable diseases. In fact, comprehensive nutrition courses in medical schools should be mandatory because the average physician receives no education in this crucial subject.  In addition, preventative health education should be mandatory throughout public school systems.   Private insurers force hospitals, clinics and private physicians into financial corners, and this is contributing to prodigious waste in money and resources. Annually, healthcare spending towards medical liability insurance costs tens of billions of dollars. In particular, this economic burden has taxed small clinics and physicians. It is well past the time that physician liability insurance is replaced with no-fault options. Today's doctors are spending an inordinate amount of money to protect themselves. Legions of liability and trial lawyers seek big paydays for themselves stemming from physician error. This has created a culture of fear among doctors and hospitals, resulting in the overly cautious practice of defensive medicine, driving up costs and insurance premiums just to avoid lawsuits. Doctors are forced to order unnecessary tests and prescribe more medications and medical procedures just to cover their backsides. No-fault insurance is a common-sense plan that enables physicians to pursue their profession in a manner that will reduce iatrogenic injuries and costs. Individual cases requiring additional medical intervention and loss of income would still be compensated. This would generate huge savings.    No other nation suffers from the scourge of excessive drug price gouging like the US. After many years of haggling to lower prices and increase access to generic drugs, only a minute amount of progress has been made in recent years. A 60 Minutes feature about the Affordable Care Act reported an "orgy of lobbying and backroom deals in which just about everyone with a stake in the $3-trillion-a-year health industry came out ahead—except the taxpayers.” For example, Life Extension magazine reported that an antiviral cream (acyclovir), which had lost its patent protection, "was being sold to pharmacies for 7,500% over the active ingredient cost. The active ingredient (acyclovir) costs only 8 pennies, yet pharmacies are paying a generic maker $600 for this drug and selling it to consumers for around $700." Other examples include the antibiotic Doxycycline. The price per pill averages 7 cents to $3.36 but has a 5,300 percent markup when it reaches the consumer. The antidepressant Clomipramine is marked up 3,780 percent, and the anti-hypertensive drug Captopril's mark-up is 2,850 percent. And these are generic drugs!    Medication costs need to be dramatically cut to allow drug manufacturers a reasonable but not obscene profit margin. By capping profits approximately 100 percent above all costs, we would save our system hundreds of billions of dollars. Such a measure would also extirpate the growing corporate misdemeanors of pricing fraud, which forces patients to pay out-of-pocket in order to make up for the costs insurers are unwilling to pay.    Finally, we can acknowledge that our healthcare is fundamentally a despotic rationing system based upon high insurance costs vis-a-vis a toss of the dice to determine where a person sits on the economic ladder. For the past three decades it has contributed to inequality. The present insurance-based economic metrics cast millions of Americans out of coverage because private insurance costs are beyond their means. Uwe Reinhardt, a Princeton University political economist, has called our system "brutal" because it "rations [people] out of the system." He defined rationing as "withholding something from someone that is beneficial." Discriminatory healthcare rationing now affects upwards to 60 million people who have been either priced out of the system or under insured. They make too much to qualify for Medicare under Obamacare, yet earn far too little to afford private insurance costs and premiums. In the final analysis, the entire system is discriminatory and predatory.    However, we must be realistic. Almost every member of Congress has benefited from Big Pharma and private insurance lobbyists. The only way to begin to bring our healthcare program up to the level of a truly developed nation is to remove the drug industry's rampant and unnecessary profiteering from the equation.     How did Fauci memory-hole a cure for AIDS and get away with it?   By Helen Buyniski   Over 700,000 Americans have died of AIDS since 1981, with the disease claiming some 42.3 million victims worldwide. While an HIV diagnosis is no longer considered a certain death sentence, the disease looms large in the public imagination and in public health funding, with contemporary treatments running into thousands of dollars per patient annually.   But was there a cure for AIDS all this time - an affordable and safe treatment that was ruthlessly suppressed and attacked by the US public health bureaucracy and its agents? Could this have saved millions of lives and billions of dollars spent on AZT, ddI and failed HIV vaccine trials? What could possibly justify the decision to disappear a safe and effective approach down the memory hole?   The inventor of the cure, Gary Null, already had several decades of experience creating healing protocols for physicians to help patients not responding well to conventional treatments by the time AIDS was officially defined in 1981. Null, a registered dietitian and board-certified nutritionist with a PhD in human nutrition and public health science, was a senior research fellow and Director of Anti-Aging Medicine at the Institute of Applied Biology for 36 years and has published over 950 papers, conducting groundbreaking experiments in reversing biological aging as confirmed with DNA methylation testing. Additionally, Null is a multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker, bestselling author, and investigative journalist whose work exposing crimes against humanity over the last 50 years has highlighted abuses by Big Pharma, the military-industrial complex, the financial industry, and the permanent government stay-behind networks that have come to be known as the Deep State.   Null was contacted in 1974 by Dr. Stephen Caiazza, a physician working with a subculture of gay men in New York living the so-called “fast track” lifestyle, an extreme manifestation of the gay liberation movement that began with the Stonewall riots. Defined by rampant sexual promiscuity and copious use of illegal and prescription drugs, including heavy antibiotic use for a cornucopia of sexually-transmitted diseases, the fast-track never included more than about two percent of gay men, though these dominated many of the bathhouses and clubs that defined gay nightlife in the era. These patients had become seriously ill as a result of their indulgence, generally arriving at the clinic with multiple STDs including cytomegalovirus and several types of herpes and hepatitis, along with candida overgrowth, nutritional deficiencies, gut issues, and recurring pneumonia. Every week for the next 10 years, Null would counsel two or three of these men - a total of 800 patients - on how to detoxify their bodies and de-stress their lives, tracking their progress with Caiazza and the other providers at weekly feedback meetings that he credits with allowing the team to quickly evaluate which treatments were most effective. He observed that it only took about two years on the “fast track” for a healthy young person to begin seeing muscle loss and the recurrent, lingering opportunistic infections that would later come to be associated with AIDS - while those willing to commit to a healthier lifestyle could regain their health in about a year.    It was with this background that Null established the Tri-State Healing Center in Manhattan in 1980, staffing the facility with what would eventually run to 22 certified health professionals to offer safe, natural, and effective low- and no-cost treatments to thousands of patients with HIV and AIDS-defining conditions. Null and his staff used variations of the protocols he had perfected with Caiazza's patients, a multifactorial patient-tailored approach that included high-dose vitamin C drips, intravenous ozone therapy, juicing and nutritional improvements and supplementation, aspects of homeopathy and naturopathy with some Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurvedic practices. Additional services offered on-site included acupuncture and holistic dentistry, while peer support groups were also held at the facility so that patients could find community and a positive environment, healing their minds and spirits while they healed their bodies.   “Instead of trying to kill the virus with antiretroviral pharmaceuticals designed to stop viral replication before it kills patients, we focused on what benefits could be gained by building up the patients' natural immunity and restoring biochemical integrity so the body could fight for itself,” Null wrote in a 2014 article describing the philosophy behind the Center's approach, which was wholly at odds with the pharmaceutical model.1   Patients were comprehensively tested every week, with any “recovery” defined solely by the labs, which documented AIDS patient after patient - 1,200 of them - returning to good health and reversing their debilitating conditions. Null claims to have never lost an AIDS patient in the Center's care, even as the death toll for the disease - and its pharmaceutical standard of care AZT - reached an all-time high in the early 1990s. Eight patients who had opted for a more intensive course of treatment - visiting the Center six days a week rather than one - actually sero-deconverted, with repeated subsequent testing showing no trace of HIV in their bodies.   As an experienced clinical researcher himself, Null recognized that any claims made by the Center would be massively scrutinized, challenging as they did the prevailing scientific consensus that AIDS was an incurable, terminal illness. He freely gave his protocols to any medical practitioner who asked, understanding that his own work could be considered scientifically valid only if others could replicate it under the same conditions. After weeks of daily observational visits to the Center, Dr. Robert Cathcart took the protocols back to San Francisco, where he excitedly reported that patients were no longer dying in his care.    Null's own colleague at the Institute of Applied Biology, senior research fellow Elana Avram, set up IV drip rooms at the Institute and used his intensive protocols to sero-deconvert 10 patients over a two-year period. While the experiment had been conducted in secret, as the Institute had been funded by Big Pharma since its inception half a century earlier, Avram had hoped she would be able to publish a journal article to further publicize Null's protocols and potentially help AIDS patients, who were still dying at incredibly high rates thanks to Burroughs Wellcome's noxious but profitable AZT. But as she would later explain in a 2019 letter to Null, their groundbreaking research never made it into print - despite meticulous documentation of their successes - because the Institute's director and board feared their pharmaceutical benefactors would withdraw the funding on which they depended, given that Null's protocols did not involve any patentable or otherwise profitable drugs. When Avram approached them about publication, the board vetoed the idea, arguing that it would “draw negative attention because [the work] was contrary to standard drug treatments.” With no real point in continuing experiments along those lines without institutional support and no hope of obtaining funding from elsewhere, the department she had created specifically for these experiments shut down after a two-year followup with her test subjects - all of whom remained alive and healthy - was completed.2   While the Center was receiving regular visits by this time from medical professionals and, increasingly, black celebrities like Stokely Carmichael and Isaac Hayes, who would occasionally perform for the patients, the news was spreading by word of mouth alone - not a single media outlet had dared to document the clinic that was curing AIDS patients for free. Instead, they gave airtime to Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, who had for years been spreading baseless, hysteria-fueling claims about HIV and AIDS to any news outlet that would put him on. His claim that children could contract the virus from “ordinary household conduct” with an infected relative proved so outrageous he had to walk it back,3 and he never really stopped insisting the deadly plague associated with gays and drug users was about to explode like a nuclear bomb among the law-abiding heterosexual population. Fauci by this time controlled all government science funding through NIAID, and his zero-tolerance approach to dissent on the HIV/AIDS front had already seen prominent scientists like virologist Peter Duesberg stripped of the resources they needed for their work because they had dared to question his commandment: There is no cause of AIDS but HIV, and AZT is its treatment. Even the AIDS activist groups, which by then had been coopted by Big Pharma and essentially reduced to astroturfing for the toxic failed chemotherapy drug AZT backed by the institutional might of Fauci's NIAID,4 didn't seem to want to hear that there was a cure. Unconcerned with the irrationality of denouncing the man touting his free AIDS cure as an  “AIDS denier,” they warned journalists that platforming Null or anyone else rejecting the mainstream medical line would be met with organized demands for their firing.    Determined to breach the institutional iron curtain and get his message to the masses, Null and his team staged a press conference in New York, inviting scientists and doctors from around the world to share their research on alternative approaches to HIV and AIDS in 1993. To emphasize the sound scientific basis of the Center's protocols and encourage guests to adopt them into their own practices, Null printed out thousands of abstracts in support of each nutrient and treatment being used. However, despite over 7,000 invitations sent three times to major media, government figures, scientists, and activists, almost none of the intended audience members showed up. Over 100 AIDS patients and their doctors, whose charts exhaustively documented their improvements using natural and nontoxic modalities over the preceding 12 months, gave filmed testimonials, declaring that the feared disease was no longer a death sentence, but the conference had effectively been silenced. Bill Tatum, publisher of the Amsterdam News, suggested Null and his patients would find a more welcoming audience in his home neighborhood of Harlem - specifically, its iconic Apollo Theatre. For three nights, the theater was packed to capacity. Hit especially hard by the epidemic and distrustful of a medical system that had only recently stopped being openly racist (the Tuskegee syphilis experiment only ended in 1972), black Americans, at least, did not seem to care what Anthony Fauci would do if he found out they were investigating alternatives to AZT and death.    PBS journalist Tony Brown, having obtained a copy of the video of patient testimonials from the failed press conference, was among a handful of black journalists who began visiting the Center to investigate the legitimacy of Null's claims. Satisfied they had something significant to offer his audience, Brown invited eight patients - along with Null himself - onto his program over the course of several episodes to discuss the work. It was the first time these protocols had received any attention in the media, despite Null having released nearly two dozen articles and multiple documentaries on the subject by that time. A typical patient on one program, Al, a recovered IV drug user who was diagnosed with AIDS at age 32, described how he “panicked,” saw a doctor and started taking AZT despite his misgivings - only to be forced to discontinue the drug after just a few weeks due to his condition deteriorating rapidly. Researching alternatives brought him to Null, and after six months of “detoxing [his] lifestyle,” he observed his initial symptoms - swollen lymph nodes and weight loss - begin to reverse, culminating with sero-deconversion. On Bill McCreary's Channel 5 program, a married couple diagnosed with HIV described how they watched their T-cell counts increase as they cut out sugar, caffeine, smoking, and drinking and began eating a healthy diet. They also saw the virus leave their bodies.   For HIV-positive viewers surrounded by fear and negativity, watching healthy-looking, cheerful “AIDS patients” detail their recovery while Null backed up their claims with charts must have been balm for the soul. But the TV programs were also a form of outreach to the medical community, with patients' charts always on hand to convince skeptics the cure was scientifically valid. Null brought patients' charts to every program, urging them to keep an open mind: “Other physicians and public health officials should know that there's good science in the alternative perspective. It may not be a therapy that they're familiar with, because they're just not trained in it, but if the results are positive, and you can document them…” He challenged doubters to send in charts from their own sero-deconverted patients on AZT, and volunteered to debate proponents of the orthodox treatment paradigm - though the NIH and WHO both refused to participate in such a debate on Tony Brown's Journal, following Fauci's directive prohibiting engagement with forbidden ideas.    Aside from those few TV programs and Null's own films, suppression of Null's AIDS cure beyond word of mouth was total. The 2021 documentary The Cost of Denial, produced by the Society for Independent Journalists, tells the story of the Tri-State Healing Center and the medical paradigm that sought to destroy it, lamenting the loss of the lives that might have been saved in a more enlightened society. Nurse practitioner Luanne Pennesi, who treated many of the AIDS patients at the Center, speculated in the film that the refusal by the scientific establishment and AIDS activists to accept their successes was financially motivated. “It was as if they didn't want this information to get out. Understand that our healthcare system as we know it is a corporation, it's a corporate model, and it's about generating revenue. My concern was that maybe they couldn't generate enough revenue from these natural approaches.”5   Funding was certainly the main disciplinary tool Fauci's NIAID used to keep the scientific community in line. Despite the massive community interest in the work being done at the Center, no foundation or institution would defy Fauci and risk getting itself blacklisted, leaving Null to continue funding the operation out of his pocket with the profits from book sales. After 15 years, he left the Center in 1995, convinced the mainstream model had so thoroughly been institutionalized that there was no chance of overthrowing it. He has continued to counsel patients and advocate for a reappraisal of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis and its pharmaceutical treatments, highlighting the deeply flawed science underpinning the model of the disease espoused by the scientific establishment in 39 articles, six documentaries and a 700-page textbook on AIDS, but the Center's achievements have been effectively memory-holed by Fauci's multi-billion-dollar propaganda apparatus.     FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE   To understand just how much of a threat Null's work was to the HIV/AIDS establishment, it is instructive to revisit the 1984 paper, published by Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute, that established HIV as the sole cause of AIDS. The CDC's official recognition of AIDS in 1981 had done little to quell the mounting public panic over the mysterious illness afflicting gay men in the US, as the agency had effectively admitted it had no idea what was causing them to sicken and die. As years passed with no progress determining the causative agent of the plague, activist groups like Gay Men's Health Crisis disrupted public events and threatened further mass civil disobedience as they excoriated the NIH for its sluggish allocation of government science funding to uncovering the cause of the “gay cancer.”6 When Gallo published his paper declaring that the retrovirus we now know as HIV was the sole “probable” cause of AIDS, its simple, single-factor hypothesis was the answer to the scientific establishment's prayers. This was particularly true for Fauci, as the NIAID chief was able to claim the hot new disease as his agency's own domain in what has been described as a “dramatic confrontation” with his rival Sam Broder at the National Cancer Institute. After all, Fauci pointed out, Gallo's findings - presented by Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler as if they were gospel truth before any other scientists had had a chance to inspect them, never mind conduct a full peer review - clearly classified AIDS as an infectious disease, and not a cancer like the Kaposi's sarcoma which was at the time its most visible manifestation. Money and media attention began pouring in, even as funding for the investigation of other potential causes of AIDS dried up. Having already patented a diagnostic test for “his” retrovirus before introducing it to the world, Gallo was poised for a financial windfall, while Fauci was busily leveraging the discovery into full bureaucratic empire of the US scientific apparatus.   While it would serve as the sole basis for all US government-backed AIDS research to follow - quickly turning Gallo into the most-cited scientist in the world during the 1980s,7 Gallo's “discovery” of HIV was deeply problematic. The sample that yielded the momentous discovery actually belonged to Prof. Luc Montagnier of the French Institut Pasteur, a fact Gallo finally admitted in 1991, four years after a lawsuit from the French government challenged his patent on the HIV antibody test, forcing the US government to negotiate a hasty profit-sharing agreement between Gallo's and Montagnier's labs. That lawsuit triggered a cascade of official investigations into scientific misconduct by Gallo, and evidence submitted during one of these probes, unearthed in 2008 by journalist Janine Roberts, revealed a much deeper problem with the seminal “discovery.” While Gallo's co-author, Mikulas Popovic, had concluded after numerous experiments with the French samples that the virus they contained was not the cause of AIDS, Gallo had drastically altered the paper's conclusion, scribbling his notes in the margins, and submitted it for publication to the journal Science without informing his co-author.   After Roberts shared her discovery with contacts in the scientific community, 37 scientific experts wrote to the journal demanding that Gallo's career-defining HIV paper be retracted from Science for lacking scientific integrity.8 Their call, backed by an endorsement from the 2,600-member scientific organization Rethinking AIDS, was ignored by the publication and by the rest of mainstream science despite - or perhaps because of - its profound implications.   That 2008 letter, addressed to Science editor-in-chief Bruce Alberts and copied to American Association for the Advancement of Science CEO Alan Leshner, is worth reproducing here in its entirety, as it utterly dismantles Gallo's hypothesis - and with them the entire HIV is the sole cause of AIDS dogma upon which the contemporary medical model of the disease rests:   On May 4, 1984 your journal published four papers by a group led by Dr. Robert Gallo. We are writing to express our serious concerns with regard to the integrity and veracity of the lead paper among these four of which Dr. Mikulas Popovic is the lead author.[1] The other three are also of concern because they rely upon the conclusions of the lead paper .[2][3][4]  In the early 1990s, several highly critical reports on the research underlying these papers were produced as a result of governmental inquiries working under the supervision of scientists nominated by the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine. The Office of Research Integrity of the US Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper was “fraught with false and erroneous statements,” and that the “ORI believes that the careless and unacceptable keeping of research records...reflects irresponsible laboratory management that has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken.”[5] Further, a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations led by US Representative John D. Dingell of Michigan produced a staff report on the papers which contains scathing criticisms of their integrity.[6]  Despite the publically available record of challenges to their veracity, these papers have remained uncorrected and continue to be part of the scientific record.  What prompts our communication today is the recent revelation of an astonishing number of previously unreported deletions and unjustified alterations made by Gallo to the lead paper. There are several documents originating from Gallo's laboratory that, while available for some time, have only recently been fully analyzed. These include a draft of the lead paper typewritten by Popovic which contains handwritten changes made to it by Gallo.[7] This draft was the key evidence used in the above described inquiries to establish that Gallo had concealed his laboratory's use of a cell culture sample (known as LAV) which it received from the Institut Pasteur.  These earlier inquiries verified that the typed manuscript draft was produced by Popovic who had carried out the recorded experiment while his laboratory chief, Gallo, was in Europe and that, upon his return, Gallo changed the document by hand a few days before it was submitted to Science on March 30, 1984. According to the ORI investigation, “Dr. Gallo systematically rewrote the manuscript for what would become a renowned LTCB [Gallo's laboratory at the National Cancer Institute] paper.”[5]  This document provided the important evidence that established the basis for awarding Dr. Luc Montagnier and Dr. Francoise Barré-Sinoussi the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the AIDS virus by proving it was their samples of LAV that Popovic used in his key experiment. The draft reveals that Popovic had forthrightly admitted using the French samples of LAV renamed as Gallo's virus, HTLV-III, and that Gallo had deleted this admission, concealing their use of LAV.  However, it has not been previously reported that on page three of this same document Gallo had also deleted Popovic's unambiguous statement that, "Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified,” replacing it in the published paper with a statement that said practically the opposite, namely, “That a retrovirus of the HTLV family might be an etiologic agent of AIDS was suggested by the findings.”  It is clear that the rest of Popovic's typed paper is entirely consistent with his statement that the cause of AIDS had not been found, despite his use of the French LAV. Popovic's final conclusion was that the culture he produced “provides the possibility” for detailed studies. He claimed to have achieved nothing more. At no point in his paper did Popovic attempt to prove that any virus caused AIDS, and it is evident that Gallo concealed these key elements in Popovic's experimental findings.  It is astonishing now to discover these unreported changes to such a seminal document. We can only assume that Gallo's alterations of Popovic's conclusions were not highlighted by earlier inquiries because the focus at the time was on establishing that the sample used by Gallo's lab came from Montagnier and was not independently collected by Gallo. In fact, the only attention paid to the deletions made by Gallo pertains to his effort to hide the identity of the sample. The questions of whether Gallo and Popovic's research proved that LAV or any other virus was the cause of AIDS were clearly not considered.  Related to these questions are other long overlooked documents that merit your attention. One of these is a letter from Dr. Matthew A. Gonda, then Head of the Electron Microscopy Laboratory at the National Cancer Institute, which is addressed to Popovic, copied to Gallo and dated just four days prior to Gallo's submission to Science.[8] In this letter, Gonda remarks on samples he had been sent for imaging because “Dr Gallo wanted these micrographs for publication because they contain HTLV.” He states, “I do not believe any of the particles photographed are of HTLV-I, II or III.” According to Gonda, one sample contained cellular debris, while another had no particles near the size of a retrovirus. Despite Gonda's clearly worded statement, Science published on May 4, 1984 papers attributed to Gallo et al with micrographs attributed to Gonda and described unequivocally as HTLV-III.  In another letter by Gallo, dated one day before he submitted his papers to Science, Gallo states, “It's extremely rare to find fresh cells [from AIDS patients] expressing the virus... cell culture seems to be necessary to induce virus,” a statement which raises the possibility he was working with a laboratory artifact. [9]  Included here are copies of these documents and links to the same. The very serious flaws they reveal in the preparation of the lead paper published in your journal in 1984 prompts our request that this paper be withdrawn. It appears that key experimental findings have been concealed. We further request that the three associated papers published on the same date also be withdrawn as they depend on the accuracy of this paper.  For the scientific record to be reliable, it is vital that papers shown to be flawed, or falsified be retracted. Because a very public record now exists showing that the Gallo papers drew unjustified conclusions, their withdrawal from Science is all the more important to maintain integrity. Future researchers must also understand they cannot rely on the 1984 Gallo papers for statements about HIV and AIDS, and all authors of papers that previously relied on this set of four papers should have the opportunity to consider whether their own conclusions are weakened by these revelations.      Gallo's handwritten revision, submitted without his colleague's knowledge despite multiple experiments that failed to support the new conclusion, was the sole foundation for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Had Science published the manuscript the way Popovic had typed it, there would be no AIDS “pandemic” - merely small clusters of people with AIDS. Without a viral hypothesis backing the development of expensive and deadly pharmaceuticals, would Fauci have allowed these patients to learn about the cure that existed all along?   Faced with a potential rebellion, Fauci marshaled the full resources under his control to squelch the publication of the investigations into Gallo and restrict any discussion of competing hypotheses in the scientific and mainstream press, which had been running virus-scare stories full-time since 1984. The effect was total, according to biochemist Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure. In a 2009 interview, Mullis recalled his own shock when he attempted to unearth the experimental basis for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Despite his extensive inquiry into the literature, “there wasn't a scientific reference…[that] said ‘here's how come we know that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.' There was nothing out there like that.”9 This yawning void at the core of HIV/AIDS “science" turned him into a strident critic of AIDS dogma - and those views made him persona non grata where the scientific press was concerned, suddenly unable to publish a single paper despite having won the Nobel Prize for his invention of the PCR test just weeks before.  10   DISSENT BECOMES “DENIAL”   While many of those who dissent from the orthodox HIV=AIDS view believe HIV plays a role in the development of AIDS, they point to lifestyle and other co-factors as being equally if not more important. Individuals who test positive for HIV can live for decades in perfect health - so long as they don't take AZT or the other toxic antivirals fast-tracked by Fauci's NIAID - but those who developed full-blown AIDS generally engaged in highly risky behaviors like extreme promiscuity and prodigious drug abuse, contracting STDs they took large quantities of antibiotics to treat, further running down their immune systems. While AIDS was largely portrayed as a “gay disease,” it was only the “fast track” gays, hooking up with dozens of partners nightly in sex marathons fueled by “poppers” (nitrate inhalants notorious for their own devastating effects on the immune system), who became sick. Kaposi's sarcoma, one of the original AIDS-defining conditions, was widespread among poppers-using gay men, but never appeared among IV drug users or hemophiliacs, the other two main risk groups during the early years of the epidemic. Even Robert Gallo himself, at a 1994 conference on poppers held by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, would admit that the previously-rare form of skin cancer surging among gay men was not primarily caused by HIV - and that it was immune stimulation, rather than suppression, that was likely responsible.11 Similarly, IV drug users are often riddled with opportunistic infections as their habit depresses the immune system and their focus on maintaining their addiction means that healthier habits - like good nutrition and even basic hygiene - fall by the wayside.    Supporting the call for revising the HIV=AIDS hypothesis to include co-factors is the fact that the mass heterosexual outbreaks long predicted by Fauci and his ilk in seemingly every country on Earth have failed to materialize, except - supposedly - in Africa, where the diagnostic standard for AIDS differs dramatically from those of the West. Given the prohibitively high cost of HIV testing for poor African nations, the WHO in 1985 crafted a diagnostic loophole that became known as the “Bangui definition,” allowing medical professionals to diagnose AIDS in the absence of a test using just clinical symptoms: high fever, persistent cough, at least 30 days of diarrhea, and the loss of 10% of one's body weight within two months. Often suffering from malnutrition and without access to clean drinking water, many of the inhabitants of sub-Saharan Africa fit the bill, especially when the WHO added tuberculosis to the list of AIDS-defining illnesses in 1993 - a move which may be responsible for as many as one half of African “AIDS” cases, according to journalist Christine Johnson. The WHO's former Chief of Global HIV Surveillance, James Chin, acknowledged their manipulation of statistics, but stressed that it was the entire AIDS industry - not just his organization - perpetrating the fraud. “There's the saying that, if you knew what sausages are made of, most people would hesitate to sort of eat them, because they wouldn't like what's in it. And if you knew how HIV/AIDS numbers are cooked, or made up, you would use them with extreme caution,” Chin told an interviewer in 2009.12   With infected numbers stubbornly remaining constant in the US despite Fauci's fearmongering projections of the looming heterosexually-transmitted plague, the CDC in 1993 broadened its definition of AIDS to include asymptomatic (that is, healthy) HIV-positive people with low T-cell counts - an absurd criteria given that an individual's T-cell count can fluctuate by hundreds within a single day. As a result, the number of “AIDS cases” in the US immediately doubled. Supervised by Fauci, the NIAID had been quietly piling on diseases into the “AIDS-related” category for years, bloating the list from just two conditions - pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma - to 30 so fast it raised eyebrows among some of science's leading lights. Deeming the entire process “bizarre” and unprecedented, Kary Mullis wondered aloud why no one had called the AIDS establishment out: “There's something wrong here. And it's got to be financial.”13   Indeed, an early CDC public relations campaign was exposed by the Wall Street Journal in 1987 as having deliberately mischaracterized AIDS as a threat to the entire population so as to garner increased public and private funding for what was very much a niche issue, with the risk to average heterosexuals from a single act of sex “smaller than the risk of ever getting hit by lightning.” Ironically, the ads, which sought to humanize AIDS patients in an era when few Americans knew anyone with the disease and more than half the adult population thought infected people should be forced to carry cards warning of their status, could be seen as a reaction to the fear tactics deployed by Fauci early on.14   It's hard to tell where fraud ends and incompetence begins with Gallo's HIV antibody test. Much like Covid-19 would become a “pandemic of testing,” with murder victims and motorcycle crashes lumped into “Covid deaths” thanks to over-sensitized PCR tests that yielded as many as 90% false positives,15 HIV testing is fraught with false positives - and unlike with Covid-19, most people who hear they are HIV-positive still believe they are receiving a death sentence. Due to the difficulty of isolating HIV itself from human samples, the most common diagnostic tests, ELISA and the Western Blot, are designed to detect not the virus but antibodies to it, upending the traditional medical understanding that the presence of antibodies indicates only exposure - and often that the body has actually vanquished the pathogen. Patients are known to test positive for HIV antibodies in the absence of the virus due to at least 70 other conditions, including hepatitis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, syphilis, recent vaccination or even pregnancy. (https://www.chcfl.org/diseases-that-can-cause-a-false-positive-hiv-test/) Positive results are often followed up with a PCR “viral load” test, even though the inventor of the PCR technique Kary Mullis famously condemned its misuse as a tool for diagnosing infection. Packaging inserts for all three tests warn the user that they cannot be reliably used to diagnose HIV.16 The ELISA HIV antibody test explicitly states: “At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence and absence of HIV antibody in human blood.”17   That the public remains largely unaware of these and other massive holes in the supposedly airtight HIV=AIDS=DEATH paradigm is a testament to Fauci's multi-layered control of the press. Like the writers of the Great Barrington Declaration and other Covid-19 dissidents, scientists who question HIV/AIDS dogma have been brutally punished for their heresy, no matter how prestigious their prior standing in the field and no matter how much evidence they have for their own claims. In 1987, the year the FDA's approval of AZT made AIDS the most profitable epidemic yet (a dubious designation Covid-19 has since surpassed), Fauci made it clearer than ever that scientific inquiry and debate - the basis of the scientific method - would no longer be welcome in the American public health sector, eliminating retrovirologist Peter Duesberg, then one of the most prominent opponents of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis, from the scientific conversation with a professional disemboweling that would make a cartel hitman blush. Duesberg had just eviscerated Gallo's 1984 HIV paper with an article of his own in the journal Cancer Research, pointing out that retroviruses had never before been found to cause a single disease in humans - let alone 30 AIDS-defining diseases. Rather than allow Gallo or any of the other scientists in his camp to respond to the challenge, Fauci waged a scorched-earth campaign against Duesberg, who had until then been one of the most highly regarded researchers in his field. Every research grant he requested was denied; every media appearance was canceled or preempted. The University of California at Berkeley, unable to fully fire him due to tenure, took away his lab, his graduate students, and the rest of his funding. The few colleagues who dared speak up for him in public were also attacked, while enemies and opportunists were encouraged to slander Duesberg at the conferences he was barred from attending and in the journals that would no longer publish his replies. When Duesberg was summoned to the White House later that year by then-President Ronald Reagan to debate Fauci on the origins of AIDS, Fauci convinced the president to cancel, allegedly pulling rank on the Commander-in-Chief with an accusation that the “White House was interfering in scientific matters that belonged to the NIH and the Office of Science and Technology Assessment.” After seven years of this treatment, Duesberg was contacted by NIH official Stephen O'Brien and offered an escape from professional purgatory. He could have “everything back,” he was told, and shown a manuscript of a scientific paper - apparently commissioned by the editor of the journal Nature - “HIV Causes AIDS: Koch's Postulates Fulfilled” with his own name listed alongside O'Brien's as an author.18 His refusal to take the bribe effectively guaranteed the epithet “AIDS denier” will appear on his tombstone. The character assassination of Duesberg became a template that would be deployed to great effectiveness wherever Fauci encountered dissent - never debate, only demonize, deplatform and destroy.    Even Luc Montagnier, the real discoverer of HIV, soon found himself on the wrong side of the Fauci machine. With his 1990 declaration that “the HIV virus [by itself] is harmless and passive, a benign virus,” Montagnier began distancing himself from Gallo's fraud, effectively placing a target on his own back. In a 1995 interview, he elaborated: “four factors that have come together to account for the sudden epidemic [of AIDS]: HIV presence, immune hyper-activation, increased sexually transmitted disease incidence, sexual behavior changes and other behavioral changes” such as drug use, poor nutrition and stress - all of which he said had to occur “essentially simultaneously” for HIV to be transmitted, creating the modern epidemic. Like the professionals at the Tri-State Healing Center, Montagnier advocated for the use of antioxidants like vitamin C and N-acetyl cysteine, naming oxidative stress as a critical factor in the progression from HIV to AIDS.19 When Montagnier died in 2022, Fauci's media mouthpieces sneered that the scientist (who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2008 for his discovery of HIV, despite his flagging faith in that discovery's significance) “started espousing views devoid of a scientific basis” in the late 2000s, leading him to be “shunned by the scientific community.”20 In a particularly egregious jab, the Washington Post's obit sings the praises of Robert Gallo, implying it was the American scientist who really should have won the Nobel for HIV, while dismissing as “

Donald Trump promises to release the JFK files—but will they reveal the truth? Author and entrepreneur Ken McCarthy has spent years researching the assassination and says we already know who did it. He breaks down the cover-up that's lasted 60 years and what the classified files might finally expose.  

Bret Weinstein speaks with Senator Ron Johnson on the subject of corruption present in COVID policies and American politics in general. They question who the “puppet masters” are and review what RFK Jr.'s stance on vaccines could bring to the upcoming administration. Finally, Bret and Senator Johnson, notorious COVID dissidents, end their discussion by considering the possibility of Fauci receiving a pardon. Find Senator Ron Johnson on X: http://x.com/RonJohnsonWI*****Join DarkHorse on Locals! Get access to our Discord server, exclusive live streams, live chats for all streams, and early access to many podcasts: https://darkhorse.locals.com Check out the DHP store! Epic tabby, digital book burning, saddle up the dire wolves, and more: https://www.darkhorsestore.orgTheme Music: Thank you to Martin Molin of Wintergatan for providing us the rights to use their excellent music.*****Mentioned in this Episode:- Oxford study claiming COVID to be a bad flu season https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/global-covid-19-case-fatality-rates- May 2020 Senator held a hearing https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/covid-19-how-new-information-should-drive-policy/- “The Real Anthony Fauci” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. https://amzn.to/3Du4J9H (commission earned)- “The Wuhan Cover-Up” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. https://amzn.to/49RARA2 (commission earned)- “What the Nurses Saw” by Ken McCarthy https://amzn.to/3VQVYga (commission earned)Support the show

Our world has become fully interconnected through technology — specifically the Internet. While many of us can't imagine life without it, everything has a beginning. So, how was the Internet born, and how has it evolved into what we know today? Who better to discuss this intriguing topic than Internet marketing pioneer and specialist Ken McCarthy? In this episode, Ken returns to the podcast to talk about his latest book, How the Web Won, a story that documents the critical formative years of the World Wide Web from 1993 to 1995. Told from the perspective of one of the masterminds behind this victory for human freedom, this narrative lays out how the Internet became a multi-trillion-dollar marketplace capable of impeccable things.  Hit play to find out: The history of the Internet, and how it evolved over the years. The key years of the 1990's for the rise of technology. How the Internet slowly became available for civilian use.  Ken is the founder of The System Club, is an internet marketing pioneer, and has interviewed many individuals on the topic of marketing. To follow along with his work, visit his website here! Upgrade Your Wallet Game with Ekster!  Get the sleek, smart wallet you deserve—and save while you're at it! Use coupon code FINDINGGENIUS at checkout or shop now with this exclusive link: ekster.com?sca_ref=4822922.DtoeXHFUmQ5  Smarter, slimmer, better. Don't miss out! Episode also available on Apple Podcast: http://apple.co/30PvU9C

Ken McCarthy joins the podcast once again to discuss his latest book, How the Web Won. This book chronicles the critical formative years of the World Wide Web from 1993 to 1995, providing insights from one of the key figures behind this triumph for human freedom. Ken has a fascinating history with the Internet, which uniquely qualifies him to write this captivating narrative. As the founder of The System Club, Ken is an Internet marketing pioneer who has interviewed numerous individuals on the topic of marketing. In 2014, Time Magazine recognized him as one of the people who transformed the Internet from a non-commercial technical platform into the world's largest marketplace and publishing platform. In this conversation, you will discover: How the idea for this book came about.  How the Internet was born and evolved over time. The difference between the Internet and the web.  To follow along with Ken and his work, visit his website here!Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

Almost no one knows the full story, but my guest, Ken McCarthy, was a key figure in shaping the way the World Wide Web eventually unfolded. Things could have gone a very different way, that would have been vastly worse for the cause of freedom. Sponsor: Book Discussed: Guest's Website:  

In this episode, Igor sits down with legendary Ken McCarthy, a trailblazer in internet marketing and a champion of small businesses to discuss bold actions, content creation, and the power of speed in communication during challenging times. They dive into topics like small business resilience, the value of critical thinking, and the transformative impact of publishing books and media to challenge mainstream narratives.

In this episode, Igor sits down with legendary Ken McCarthy, a trailblazer in internet marketing and a champion of small businesses to discuss bold actions, content creation, and the power of speed in communication during challenging times. They dive into topics like small business resilience, the value of critical thinking, and the transformative impact of publishing books and media to challenge mainstream narratives.

Ken McCarthy is a prolific author, social and political critic, and one of the early pioneers of the movement to commercialize the Internet. Time Magazine credits him with being the first person to articulate the importance of the click-through rate as a key metric for making the Internet commercially viable. He played an important role in the development of the Internet publishing landscape. In addition to his business accomplishments, Ken's lifelong interests in health, science, and political injustice have led him to study the corruption of medicine and science, as well as undertake substantial projects as a citizen journalist. His activism has included empowering disadvantaged communities in the Hudson Valley, New York and New Orleans. He has authored books dealing with entrepreneuralship and internet marketing, and more controversial topics such as the Covid pandemic, Anthony Fauci and medical totalitarianism, the genocide in Israel, and Kennedys. Ken's most recent book is "JFK and RFK's Secret Battle Against Zionist Extremism: The Documentary Evidence", co-authored with Rick Sterling who has appeared as a guest on this program in the past. His website is JFKAntiwar.com

Ken McCarthy is widely known as the godfather of internet marketing, but he is also a dissident content creator, and in today's episode we discuss the recent unpleasantness (we dare not say its name here, for obvious reasons) and what nurses were reporting about what was happening in the hospitals. We also cover what Anthony Fauci was up to in the 1980s, long before his recent celebrity. Sponsors: & Guest's Websites:

In this riveting episode of Truth Be Told Paranormal, host Tony Sweet welcomes author Ken McCarthy for an in-depth conversation that uncovers some of the most hidden and controversial chapters in American history. Known for their brave battles against organized crime and the CIA's push for war in Vietnam, the Kennedy brothers—JFK and RFK—also found themselves in a secret struggle against Zionist extremism during the summer of 1963. Ken McCarthy, author of Fauci's First Fraud, What the Nurses Saw, and his latest work, JFK and RFK's Secret Battle Against Zionist Extremism, joins Tony to shed light on this little-known aspect of the Kennedy legacy. As they explore how these battles unfolded and why they've remained largely in the shadows, you'll gain new insights into the forces that shaped 20th-century America. Einstein himself called Zionist extremism "among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times," and McCarthy's book reveals why this issue was of such concern to the Kennedys. Tune in on the Club Paranormal YouTube channel to hear this eye-opening discussion. Whether you're a history buff or a fan of the unexplained, this episode promises to challenge everything you thought you knew. #TruthBeToldParanormal #JFK #RFK #KenMcCarthy #Zionism #HiddenHistory #Podcast #TonySweetSubscribe and listen now on  @TheClubParanormal  your favorite podcast platform to join us in this compelling journey into the darkness.Please Like, Subscribe and Share today's show, Please visit www.ClubParanormal.com for more information about upcoming shows.

Capturing potential customers' attention online is among the most difficult marketing tasks. What are businesses doing now to attract, maintain, and grow their audience? Ken McCarthy, an expert in direct marketing, sits down to explain… Since the early '90s, Ken has pioneered internet-based direct response strategies – helping countless professionals reach their goals. He is not only a business specialist but also a widely recognized activist, educator, and author with boundless knowledge.  Are you ready to expand your understanding of marketing in the 21st century? Join us now to uncover the innovative techniques and strategies that can help your business thrive in the digital age! In this discussion, we cover:  Why businesses have the tendency to plateau.  How to participate in “niche marketing.” Guidelines for running a successful business.  How to identify who is interacting with your marketing efforts. Want to find out more about Ken and his important work? Click here now! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

Ken McCarthy returns to the podcast to share his insights and strategies for leveraging digital marketing opportunities. With decades of experience in the business world, Ken uses his diverse background to help others succeed in their professional endeavors. What makes his approach unique? He joins us to explain… Ken is an internationally recognized activist, educator, and entrepreneur who has been pioneering internet-based direct response strategies since the early '90s. He employs evidence-based protocols to identify different types of audiences and capture their attention. This direct marketing tactic has helped countless businesses attract, maintain, and grow their client base. Today, Ken joins us to share his secrets! In this conversation, we explore: The importance of being an expert in all markets.  How to identify and market to your audience. The four segments of the marketplace. What “hyper-responsives” are and their role in the marketplace.   Want to find out more about Ken and his important work? Click here now! Take advantage of a 5% discount on Ekster accessories by using the code FINDINGGENIUS. Enhance your style and functionality with premium accessories. Visit bit.ly/3uiVX9R to explore latest collection Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/30PvU9C

In today's episode, we welcome back Ken McCarthy to explore a compelling and contentious subject: the outlook on and assassination of John F. Kennedy. McCarthy, the author of John F. Kennedy Anti-Imperialist: His Character and Intentions Revealed in Five Speeches and One Telegram, aims to highlight Kennedy's critical yet often neglected perspective. Tune in to uncover: The origins of the term "conspiracy theory" The dynamics of large-scale corruption The motivations behind McCarthy's recent publications An analysis of Kennedy's views on global politics. McCarthy has dedicated a significant portion of his life to revealing widespread corruption that often escapes mainstream media attention. Join us as we delve into the truth with one of the nation's most influential activists, educators, entrepreneurs, and pioneers in the commercialization of the internet. To learn more, visit Ken McCarthy | Ken McCarthy is an American activist, educator, entrepreneur and Internet commercialization pioneer. Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

In this episode, Ken McCarthy joins once again to discuss an intriguing topic that carries significant controversy: John F. Kennedy's worldview and assassination. As the author of John F. Kennedy Anti-Imperialist: His Character and Intentions Revealed in Five Speeches and One Telegram, Ken is on a mission to shed light on the importance of Kennedy's fundamental but strangely overlooked point of view…  Jump in to discover:  Where the term “conspiracy theory” came from.  How and if Robert F. Kennedy can win the 2024 presidential election. What inspired Ken to write his latest book.  An overview of Kennedy's perspective on international affairs.  How thuggery operates at a large scale.  Ken has devoted much of his life to exposing mass corruption that the mainstream media hides – and his work only continues to evolve. Are you ready to uncover the truth with one of the country's most impactful activists, educators, entrepreneurs, and Internet commercialization pioneers? Join the conversation now! To find out more about Ken and his important work, click here! Take advantage of a 5% discount on Ekster accessories by using the code FINDINGGENIUS. Enhance your style and functionality with premium accessories. Visit bit.ly/3uiVX9R to explore latest collection. Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/30PvU9C  

In 1993, when most people didn't even know what an email address was, Ken McCarthy was already pioneering online marketing. He saw the internet's potential early on and has been a driving force in its evolution. Recently, this "Godfather of Internet Marketing" made a surprising shift to books. Join us as we explore Ken McCarthy's career, his views on today's online marketing, and the new direction he's taking.

In 1993, when most people didn't even know what an email address was, Ken McCarthy was already pioneering online marketing. He saw the internet's potential early on and has been a driving force in its evolution. Recently, this "Godfather of Internet Marketing" made a surprising shift to books. Join us as we explore Ken McCarthy's career, his views on today's online marketing, and the new direction he's taking.

Here we go again!Ken McCarthy is a seminal pioneer both of the commercial Internet and citizen journalism.Time Magazine credits him with being the first person to recognize and articulate the importance of the click-through rate as a key metric for making the Internet commercially viable.In 1997, he launched the first news blog ever, a detailed account of an election fraud investigation in San Francisco as it unfolded.He was also a pioneer of, and in some cases directly initiated, the use of many now- common Internet publishing activities: email marketing (1994), banner advertising (1994), A/B split testing (1996), email auto-responders (1996), blogging (1997), push-button audio content (now known as “podcasting”) (2002), online video (2005), and mobile marketing (2008).He was introduced to the practice of science as an undergraduate at Princeton University where he studied with Julian Jaynes (psychology) and Bart Hoebel (neuroscience). He's currently actively involved in advancing innovations in neurology and rehabilitative medicine through his support of fundamental research.On February 1, 2020, he predicted in writing on two Twitters posts that 1) the news out of China was suspect, 2) it gave the appearance of being a news media campaign for flu shots, and 3) it could possibly lead to the rapid development of dangerous coronavirus vaccines with more focus on speed than “science."In August of 2020, Ken released the documentary “Fauci's First Fraud” which was cited 28 times in the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. book “The Real Anthony Fauci.”He is author of the new book “What the Nurses Saw” about the systemic medical murders that took place and continue to take place under cover of COVID hysteria. Visit www.WhatTheNursesSaw.com to learn more.Show sponsored by RogersHood.com, use code IDM for 10% off your order!Support the showFor more Informed Dissent visit our website at Informed Dissent Media Follow us on Social media @InformedDissentMedia

Here we go again!Ken McCarthy is a seminal pioneer both of the commercial Internet and citizen journalism.Time Magazine credits him with being the first person to recognize and articulate the importance of the click-through rate as a key metric for making the Internet commercially viable.In 1997, he launched the first news blog ever, a detailed account of an election fraud investigation in San Francisco as it unfolded.He was also a pioneer of, and in some cases directly initiated, the use of many now- common Internet publishing activities: email marketing (1994), banner advertising (1994), A/B split testing (1996), email auto-responders (1996), blogging (1997), push-button audio content (now known as “podcasting”) (2002), online video (2005), and mobile marketing (2008).He was introduced to the practice of science as an undergraduate at Princeton University where he studied with Julian Jaynes (psychology) and Bart Hoebel (neuroscience). He's currently actively involved in advancing innovations in neurology and rehabilitative medicine through his support of fundamental research.On February 1, 2020, he predicted in writing on two Twitters posts that 1) the news out of China was suspect, 2) it gave the appearance of being a news media campaign for flu shots, and 3) it could possibly lead to the rapid development of dangerous coronavirus vaccines with more focus on speed than “science."In August of 2020, Ken released the documentary “Fauci's First Fraud” which was cited 28 times in the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. book “The Real Anthony Fauci.”He is author of the new book “What the Nurses Saw” about the systemic medical murders that took place and continue to take place under cover of COVID hysteria. Visit www.WhatTheNursesSaw.com to learn more.Show sponsored by RogersHood.com, use code IDM for 10% off your order!Support the Show.For more Informed Dissent visit our website at Informed Dissent Media Follow us on Social media @InformedDissentMedia

Nick Riewoldt and Joey Montagna discuss the expectations that are now on the Bombers rising after a strong past 6 weeks. Richmond are in limbo-land and it's on Adem Yze to turn this around, and take ownership of the club. Pressure mounting on the Saints and rightfully so.  Real Talk Shit Talk puts Thursday night footy, NT Taskforce and Nick Daicos on the agenda.   -------- Add the show to your favourites on LiSTNR: https://listnr.com/podcasts/footy-talk-australian-rules-podcast  Listen on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/footy-talk-daily-australian-rules-podcast/id1673652644  Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1q5RUW2KTONUoP8KF3ZZHY?si=6798bf7f4a1540be See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this Episode 447 of Health Solutions, Shawn & Janet Needham R. Ph. discuss the concerns about early 2020 events, medical freedom and Ken's book "What the Nurses Saw" with Ken McCarthy. 00:00 - Start 00:37 - Ken's Intro 00:48 - Ken's Background 04:21 - Trust in Hospital Care 07:37 - Patient Advocacy 08:50 - Alternate Medical Reality 12:02 - Hospital Protocols 18:40 - Financial Incentives 20:41 - Reporting Doctors 25:00 - Protocols Leading to Patient Deaths 31:04 - Father's Daughter Killed in Hospital 33:00 - Replacing Ethical Doctors with Unethical Ones 37:01 - Parallels to History 39:49 - Timing 40:47 - Ken's Passion 41:02 - Ken's Contact Information 41:44 - Closing Comments Episode Resources Website ~ https://whatthenursessaw.com/ EP 447: Discussing Concern About Early 2020 Events and Medical Freedom with Ken McCarthy ~ #2020 #doctor #doctors #nurse #nurses #healthcareproviders #healthcareworkers #hospitals #protocol #podcastshow #podcast #podcastguest #optimalhealth #healthfreedom #MedicalFreedom #medicaleducation #medicalcare #HealthCare #PriceTransparency #freemarket #Liberty #FitAfter50 #FitOver50 #fitover40 #fitafter40 #Boise #IdahoFalls #Tricities #SiouxFalls #Wenatchee #EducateAndEmpower #NeedhamHealthSolutions #TeamNeedham #ShawnNeedham #HealthSolutions #MosesLakeProfessionalPharmacy #MLRX #SickenedTheBook #ShawnNeedhamRPh #ThinkOutsideTheSystem #OptimalHealthMatters #ItsTime ~ *** #BenShapiro & #DaveRamsey Fans. Learn how to be in the driver's seat for your healthcare choices {not the system or doctors!}

ATTENTION: Please listen to segments in order.  These were severely censored so we are unable to upload the podcast in one singular unedited file.  Check the Jen Charlton Show Rumble Page on Wednesday 2.7.2024 for the full uncensored show. Guests: Tom Renz, Attorney - expert on Covid litigation and health system issues. Follow on Rumble Podcast Tom Renz Support Tom Dr. Jeffrey Barke - Medical practitioner and plaintiff against the Medical Boards. Check out his www.MorningMessage.com on Holistic Health. Follow Tom on Facebook Support Jeff References & Sources: The complete podcast with interviews and first-hand information from experienced nurses: Content highlighted from Tom's podcast episode with Nurses Erin and Kim and Ken McCarthy, author of "What the Nurses Saw" https://rumble.com/v49gi1o-hospital-murder-a-conversation-with-the-nurses.html Follow Jen: Twitter @RealJenCharlton  Rumble @TheJenCharltonShow Facebook @TheJenCharltonShow Please support our sponsors: Sweeties on the Creek - for yummy ice cream, sweet treats and gifts TotalWellFit.com for quality wellness products CharltonScientific.org - for the RICO (Racketeering Case) fighting to stop election fraud See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

ATTENTION: Please listen to segments in order.  These were severely censored so we are unable to upload the podcast in one singular unedited file.  Check the Jen Charlton Show Rumble Page on Wednesday 2.7.2024 for the full uncensored show. Guests: Tom Renz, Attorney - expert on Covid litigation and health system issues. Follow on Rumble Podcast Tom Renz Support Tom Dr. Jeffrey Barke - Medical practitioner and plaintiff against the Medical Boards. Check out his www.MorningMessage.com on Holistic Health. Follow Tom on Facebook Support Jeff References & Sources: The complete podcast with interviews and first-hand information from experienced nurses: Content highlighted from Tom's podcast episode with Nurses Erin and Kim and Ken McCarthy, author of "What the Nurses Saw" https://rumble.com/v49gi1o-hospital-murder-a-conversation-with-the-nurses.html Follow Jen: Twitter @RealJenCharlton  Rumble @TheJenCharltonShow Facebook @TheJenCharltonShow Please support our sponsors: Sweeties on the Creek - for yummy ice cream, sweet treats and gifts TotalWellFit.com for quality wellness products CharltonScientific.org - for the RICO (Racketeering Case) fighting to stop election fraud See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

ATTENTION: Please listen to segments in order.  These were severely censored so we are unable to upload the podcast in one singular unedited file.  Check the Jen Charlton Show Rumble Page on Wednesday 2.7.2024 for the full uncensored show. Guests: Tom Renz, Attorney - expert on Covid litigation and health system issues. Follow on Rumble Podcast Tom Renz Support Tom Dr. Jeffrey Barke - Medical practitioner and plaintiff against the Medical Boards. Check out his www.MorningMessage.com on Holistic Health. Follow Tom on Facebook Support Jeff References & Sources: The complete podcast with interviews and first-hand information from experienced nurses: Content highlighted from Tom's podcast episode with Nurses Erin and Kim and Ken McCarthy, author of "What the Nurses Saw" https://rumble.com/v49gi1o-hospital-murder-a-conversation-with-the-nurses.html Follow Jen: Twitter @RealJenCharlton  Rumble @TheJenCharltonShow Facebook @TheJenCharltonShow Please support our sponsors: Sweeties on the Creek - for yummy ice cream, sweet treats and gifts TotalWellFit.com for quality wellness products CharltonScientific.org - for the RICO (Racketeering Case) fighting to stop election fraud See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

ATTENTION: Please listen to segments in order.  These were severely censored so we are unable to upload the podcast in one singular unedited file.  Check the Jen Charlton Show Rumble Page on Wednesday 2.7.2024 for the full uncensored show. Guests: Tom Renz, Attorney - expert on Covid litigation and health system issues. Follow on Rumble Podcast Tom Renz Support Tom Dr. Jeffrey Barke - Medical practitioner and plaintiff against the Medical Boards. Check out his www.MorningMessage.com on Holistic Health. Follow Tom on Facebook Support Jeff References & Sources: The complete podcast with interviews and first-hand information from experienced nurses: Content highlighted from Tom's podcast episode with Nurses Erin and Kim and Ken McCarthy, author of "What the Nurses Saw" https://rumble.com/v49gi1o-hospital-murder-a-conversation-with-the-nurses.html Follow Jen: Twitter @RealJenCharlton  Rumble @TheJenCharltonShow Facebook @TheJenCharltonShow Please support our sponsors: Sweeties on the Creek - for yummy ice cream, sweet treats and gifts TotalWellFit.com for quality wellness products CharltonScientific.org - for the RICO (Racketeering Case) fighting to stop election fraud See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

He is a pioneer of the commercial internet and citizen journalism. Time Magazine credits him with being the first person to recognize and articulate the importance of the click-through rate as a key metric for making the internet commercially viable. In 1997, he launched the first news blog ever and he's published two books Fauci's First Fraud and What The Nurses Saw. Let me know what you think. Text me 587-217-8500 Substack:https://open.substack.com/pub/shaunnewmanpodcastE-transfer here: shaunnewmanpodcast@gmail.com Website: https://silvergoldbull.ca/ Email: SNP@silvergoldbull.com Phone (877) 646-5303 – general sales line, ask for Grahame and be sure to let us know you're an SNP listener.

Support the showPlease support our AMAZING Sponsors:Shell Shock CBD www.shellshockcbd.com Promo Code SHANNONJOY for 10% off ‘To shop for the emergency medical and Ivermectin kits that Dr. McCullough mentioned today please go to https://www.twc.health/pages/shannonjoy-prepkitAnd make sure you use the SHANNONJOY promo code for an additional 10% off. https://qpgoatsoap.com/ USE PROMOCODE "JOY"

We're supposed to trust the medical system with our lives, and during the 2020 pandemic, this trust was put to the test. Since COVID, countless medical professionals have come forward to expose the chilling details of government-mandated medical negligence. What were the results? Ken McCarthy sits down to enlighten us… Ken is a returning guest with a knack for exposing large-scale corruption. He is an activist, educator, entrepreneur, and Internet commercialization pioneer. He is also the author of Fauci's First Fraud, 78 Days of Terror, and Unraveling the CoVid Con. In his most recent book, What the Nurses Saw, he provides a comprehensive account of the failed COVID protocols – and the dictatorial control of the medical system during the pandemic. In this conversation, we discuss: How the pandemic exposed systemic problems in the medical system. Who What the Nurses Saw is for.  The dangerous side effects of Remdesivir. Want to find out more about Ken and his important work? Click here now! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

On today's show, Ken discusses his recent book 'What the Nurses Saw". GUEST OVERVIEW: Ken is an investigative journalist, author, and documentary filmmaker. You can learn more about him at https://www.kenmccarthy.com      

Nurses Out Loud with Kimberly Overton, BSN, RN – The narrative was that covid was killing all of our patients, but this was not the case at all. These patients didn't die from a disease; they didn't die from a virus. These patients died in a hospital holocaust, and this shamelessly corrupt system used its well-intentioned nurses to carry out its sinister plan. We must address this issue head-on and hold those...

Nurses Out Loud with Kimberly Overton, BSN, RN – The narrative was that covid was killing all of our patients, but this was not the case at all. These patients didn't die from a disease; they didn't die from a virus. These patients died in a hospital holocaust, and this shamelessly corrupt system used its well-intentioned nurses to carry out its sinister plan. We must address this issue head-on and hold those...

When whispers from the front lines of the pandemic turned into harrowing truths, author Ken McCarthy took it upon himself to give those confessions a voice in his latest book, "What the Nurses Saw." This episode takes you beyond the sanitized headlines, straight into the heart of crisis-ridden hospital wards, where nurses and healthcare workers faced the daunting task of caring for patients amid controversial medical protocols. Join us as we explore these personal stories with Ken, shedding light on the challenges that came with enforcing treatments that sometimes did more harm than good, and the moral dilemmas that haunted those tasked with patient care.The words 'sedatives' and 'ventilation' might evoke a sense of relief when it comes to respiratory distress, but not so during the peak of COVID-19. With Ken McCarthy as our guide, we scrutinize the often devastating effects of these medical interventions, the legal entanglements that ensued, and the compelling stories of healthcare professionals who dared to question the status quo. The episode uncovers the layers of complexity added by medical regulations, media narratives, and the unseen struggle for ethical practice amidst a global health emergency.Healthcare has never been more of a battleground, and standing by your side, a knowledgeable advocate, has never been more critical. We share powerful accounts of nurses who witnessed a transformation in hospitals—a shift from patient care to profit-driven decision-making—and the subsequent rise of advocacy groups fighting to turn the tide. This episode is not just a tell-all; it's a call to action, underscoring the profound importance of informed medical advocacy and the urgent need for allies in the fight for compassionate healthcare.graithcare.com Graith Care Independent Patient Advocate medical advocacy, consultation, advice US and InternationalOH EDDIES WHISKEY BOURBON SAUCE Oh Eddies Sweet Whiskey Bourbon Sauce is guaranteed to step up your next barbeque. Made in MinnesotaDisclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the show Thank you for listening to this episode of HuttCast, the American Podcast. We hope you enjoyed today's discussion and gained valuable insights. To stay updated on our latest episodes, be sure to subscribe to our podcast on your preferred listening platform. Don't forget to leave us a rating and review, as it helps others discover our show. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions for future topics, please reach out to us through our website or social media channels. Until next time, keep on learning and exploring the diverse voices that make America great.

In this episode, we are once again joined by Ken McCarthy, a widely recognized activist, educator, entrepreneur, and Internet commercialization pioneer. He has devoted years of his life to exposing the corruption that mainstream media hides. What's his motivation? To uncover the truth.  Ken is the author of various books, including Fauci's First Fraud, 78 Days of Terror, and The Pandemic Letters. His most recent publication, What the Nurses Saw, details the eye-witness accounts of failed COVID protocols – an unsettling picture of what happens when dictatorial bureaucrats hijack medicine… Join in now to learn about: What health professionals saw during the pandemic, and why they were censored and ignored. Why many investigative reporters aren't covering the COVID fraud.  Frightening accounts of medical negligence during COVID and beyond.  Want to find out more about Ken and his important work? Click here now! Take advantage of a 5% discount on Ekster accessories by using the code FINDINGGENIUS. Enhance your style and functionality with premium accessories. Visit bit.ly/3uiVX9R to explore latest collection. Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/30PvU9

A new book examines the nation's COVID-19 protocols and those who were censored and silenced for speaking out against them. The author of “What the Nurses Saw,” Ken McCarthy, joined Liz Collin Reports to discuss what he documented.Support the show

TODAY ON THE ROBERT SCOTT BELL SHOW: World immune system, Ken McCarthy, What the Nurses Saw, Failed COVID protocols, Neurologic Lyme Disease, Raw milk haters, Kelly Browne, Trinity School of Natural Health, Hispanic community health concerns, Colombia medicine, Military PFAS contamination, Homeopathic Hit – Sabadilla and MORE! http://www.robertscottbell.com/natural-remedies/world-immune-system-ken-mccarthy-what-the-nurses-saw-failed-covid-protocols-neurologic-lyme-disease-raw-milk-haters-kelly-browne-trinity-school-of-natural-health-hispanic-community-health-conc/

In this episode, Ken McCarthy sits down with Richard Jacobs to discuss his approach to business and personal success. Richard is the Founder and CEO of Speakeasy Marketing Inc., a company that has been providing SEO authority marketing services to attorneys across the country for over a decade.  In addition to his work with Speakeasy, Richard is an avid podcaster, speaker, author, and chess player. With over a decade of experience as a successful entrepreneur, Richard is constantly refining his approach to marketing, business development, and communication.   you ready to learn more about Richard's secrets to success? Join us now to find out! Join the conversation now to discover: How Richard got started with legal marketing.  The uniqueness of working with overseas employees.  The power of systemization for business growth.  How to create unique content for attorneys at a large scale. How to conduct a productive interview.  You can learn more about Speakeasy Marketing by clicking here! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/30PvU9C

What does it take to run a business sustainably and effectively? Ken McCarthy sits down with Richard Jacobs to discuss his secrets to personal and business success… As the Founder and CEO of Speakeasy Marketing Inc., Richard has worked tirelessly to establish a stable foundation for his business. For over a decade, Speakeasy has provided SEO authority marketing services to attorneys nationwide – and continues to do so at a remarkably high level.  In addition to his work with Speakeasy, Richard has written numerous books, hosts The Finding Genius Podcast, and speaks at numerous legal conferences. In this episode, we cover: How to achieve sustainable audience engagement.  Insight for how to manage a large amount of employees. Why having several layers of quality assurance is so critical for content generation.  How long it takes to build a website from the ground up.  Techniques for an effective interview.  You can learn more about Speakeasy Marketing by clicking here! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

In this episode, Ken McCarthy sits down with Richard Jacobs to discuss his approach to business and personal success. Richard is the Founder and CEO of Speakeasy Marketing Inc., a company that has been providing SEO authority marketing services to attorneys across the country for over a decade.  In addition to his work with Speakeasy, Richard is an avid podcaster, speaker, author, and chess player. With over a decade of experience as a successful entrepreneur, Richard is constantly refining his approach to marketing, business development, and communication.   you ready to learn more about Richard's secrets to success? Join us now to find out! Join the conversation now to discover: How Richard got started with legal marketing.  The uniqueness of working with overseas employees.  The power of systemization for business growth.  How to create unique content for attorneys at a large scale. How to conduct a productive interview.  You can learn more about Speakeasy Marketing by clicking here! Episode also available on Apple Podcast: http://apple.co/30PvU9C

Are you waiting until your customers hit "unsubscribe" to try and salvage the relationship? Robert Skrob, marketing expert and former business partner of Dan Kennedy, says that employing this tactic is like deciding to work on your marriage just as your spouse is about to ask for a divorce. There's plenty you can (and should) be doing to preserve the relationship from the start. Ken McCarthy, one of the earliest pioneers of internet marketing, interviews Robert to get his masterful advice on how to foster stronger, more lasting relationships with your customers, members and/or clients. MagneticMarketing.com NoBSLetter.com

Fauci's First murders? HIV-AIDS - Ken McCarthy, Author of Fauci's First Fraud joins us. In my judgment, investigative writer Ken McCarthy's new book, Fauci's First Fraud proves that Tony Fauci's first wave of killing people wasn't with Covid, it was with the HIV/AIDS events. The book also demonstrates that Fauci used the identical pattern in his attack against same-sex attracted men as he has used against all of society. When men from highly-sexualized, same-sex communities made themselves very sick by constant partying, indiscriminate sex strangers, massive amounts of drugs and prophylactic use of antibiotics, instead of telling these men to stop harming themselves, Tony Fauci did something that will sound familiar. Fauci and cohorts announced there was a virus. He got an Emergency Authorization for a deadly drug, AZT. Fauci told men this was the cure. AZT, apparently made by Gilead Sciences which also makes Remdesivir, was so deadly the FDA had banned its use in humans. To find the virus--and, you will learn from Author Ken McCarthy there is good reason to doubt there even is an HIV virus--Tony Fauci misused a testing device the inventor himself said was not for diagnostic purposes. That test was the same PCR test Fauci misused in his Covid con. What does God's Word say? 1 Corinthians 6:9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,1 Corinthians 6:18 Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body.Episode 911 Links:Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America Paperback – June 1, 2023Biden monkeypox advisor Demetre Daskalakis says the Biden administration aims to "support peoples' joy as opposed to calling them 'risky'":"One person's idea of risk is another person's idea of a great festival or Friday night."Tony Fauci pretends kids can get what he called AIDS through casual contact4Patriots https://4patriots.com Protect your family with Food kits, solar generators and more at 4Patriots. Use code TODD for 10% off your first purchase. Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price. BiOptimizers https://magbreakthrough.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% off your order. Bonefrog https://bonefrog.us Enter promo code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your subscription. Bulwark Capital http://KnowYourRiskRadio.com Find out how Bulwark Capital Actively Manages risk. Call 866-779-RISK or visit KnowYourRiskRadio.com Patriot Mobile https://patriotmobile.com/herman Get free activation today with offer code HERMAN. Visit or call 878-PATRIOT. RuffGreens https://ruffgreens.com/todd Get your FREE Jumpstart Trial Bag of Ruff Greens, simply cover shipping. Visit or call 877-MYDOG-64. SOTA Weight Loss https://sotaweightloss.com SOTA Weight Loss is, say it with me now, STATE OF THE ART! Sound of Freedom https://angel.com/freedom Join the two million and see Sound of Freedom in theaters July 4th. GreenHaven Interactive https://greenhaveninteractive.com Digital Marketing including search engine optimization and website design.

In part 2 of our discussion with Ken McCarthy, we continue to dissect the interconnectivity between the AIDS pandemic and the 2020 global pandemic. Drawing from his latest book Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America, Ken illustrates in greater detail the truth behind the corruption of healthcare.  Does the CDC really have our best interests at heart? Is healthcare a just corrupt business using mass hysteria as a marketing scheme? Join the conversation now to hear Ken's perspective on these unsettling topics… In this episode, we talk about: Why the “war on AIDS” was bogus.  How disease outbreaks in Africa have been handled in the past.  The role that Fauci has played in various health crises.  Why free speech is technically self-defense.  Want to learn more about Ken and his work? Click here now! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

Once again, we are joined by Ken McCarthy, one of the original pioneers of the movement to commercialize the Internet. As an activist, educator, entrepreneur, and Internet commercialization pioneer, Ken is on a mission to redefine online business and educate his audience. Ken is an author that's determined to expose people to the truth. In his latest book, Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America, he outlines the logistics behind the AIDS pandemic – and how the 2020 global pandemic was similar.  Was the pandemic truly what it seemed, or was there more going on that we don't know about? In this episode, we sit down with Ken to address this question and others like it… Jump in now to uncover: How the CDC functions in our society. How antibiotic abuse impacted the AIDS pandemic. The ways that mass hysteria impacts public health.  Want to learn more about Ken and his work? Click here now! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr

In this episode, we continue our conversation with Ken McCarthy, the author of Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America. In part 2 of this series, we dive deeper into the mysteries behind the AIDS pandemic and the 2020 global pandemic…  The conditions needed to create mass hysteria and control society seem to be carefully calculated. Is public health being weaponized in order to make money and control our population? Click play to hear Ken flush these ideas out using history and data! Tune in now to find out: Different medical frauds that Fauci was a part of.  Methods used by health professionals to scare people. Whether or not the 2020 pandemic is using the same “playbook” as AIDS. Why free speech is being taken away from us.  Want to learn more about Ken and his work? Click here now! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/30PvU9C

Returning to the podcast is Ken McCarthy, . He sits down with us to discuss Fauci's First Fraud: The Foundation of Medical Totalitarianism in America, his latest book that dives into the logistics behind the AIDS pandemic – and how the 2020 global pandemic is eerily similar… The 2020 pandemic certainly affected all of us in different ways. So how was this event orchestrated, and has it been done before? Ken McCarthy joins us to explain… Tune in now to discover: Why the CDC is constantly trying to “find” new diseases. The factors that contributed to the rise of AIDS. How poppers were used during the AIDS pandemic. How media companies make money off of societal hysteria.  Want to learn more about Ken and his work? Click here now! Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: http://apple.co/30PvU9C

Geocentrism. Preformationism. Ice pick lobotomies cure depression. What do these ideas have in common? They were once accepted as true, influencing how people understood and interacted with the world around them. From our modern-day vantage point, we can laugh at the absurdity – at the foolishness of our forefathers. We might even consider them hoodwinked by holes in their own scientific knowledge. But we can also learn something, which is that humans love storytelling. Whether we tell them or listen to them, stories help us make sense of the world. That doesn't make them true. It might take a year, century, or millennium, but every story – and the compelling beliefs they engender – is liable to be disrobed, layer by layer…  Often until the emperor has no clothes. Press play to explore: What the Nuremberg Code entails, its importance, and its place in the medical ethics profession today. AIDS, autism, and Cohh-viddd-19 - possible connections, big implications. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for women: where it went, why, and how it all might relate to the normalization of 'gender fluidity.' Intubation: the when, why, and serious risks. In addition to pioneering much of the technology we use today, Ken McCarthy is an educator, activist, and author. Find his books on Amazon, including Unraveling the Cohh-viddd Con: How One Marketer Exposed the Truth When It Mattered (Volume I and II).  Tune in to tap into decades' worth of his eye-opening insight. Episode also available on Apple Podcast: http://apple.co/30PvU9C

In this episode of MSOM, Sean Morgan interviews Ken McCarthy about his new book The Covid Con Volume 2 and what citizen patriots can do to fight back against medical murder.https://www.brasscheck.com/video/Get Breaking News Updates: https://SeanMorganReport.comWant to listen to this episode on the go? Click the link below!FREE OR PREMIUM MEMBERSHIP:https://bit.ly/ampplansBUY GOLD: https://bit.ly/PHDMorganBUY A SAT PHONE: https://bit.ly/ampsatphonesMyPatriotSupply: https://bit.ly/amppatriotsupplyNearly 60% of Americans are concerned about running out of money.RECEIVE A FREE CONSULTATION & A FREE E-BOOK ABOUT ANNUITIEShttps://www.americanmediaperiscope.net/clevelandSave up to 66% off at https://MyPillow.com with AMP888RNCstore.com Use Promo Code AMP888https://GrillBlazer.com Save 10 Percent with AMP888AMPNEWS.USSupport the show