Podcasts about Program management

In this episode, Ricardo discusses the common rush to start acting before fully understanding a project's problem. Action creates a sense of progress, while thinking may seem like wasted time. However, teams can work intensely and still move quickly in the wrong direction. Ricardo emphasizes that speed should not be confused with impulsiveness. Asking simple questions about the problem, missing information, potential consequences, urgency, and reversibility can prevent weeks of unnecessary rework. Even during crises or emergencies, acting quickly does not mean abandoning reflection. Planning often appears expensive because it happens before execution, while the cost of correcting poor decisions remains hidden. Before saying there is no time to think, teams should ask whether they have time to do the work twice. Want to know more? Tune in to the podcast!

Neste episódio, Ricardo reflete sobre a pressa de iniciar ações em projetos sem compreender o problema. Ele explica que agir transmite sensação de progresso, enquanto pensar pode parecer perda de tempo, embora decisões precipitadas gerem reuniões, retrabalho, atrasos e desperdício. Ricardo ressalta que velocidade não deve ser confundida com impulsividade: equipes podem trabalhar intensamente e, ainda assim, avançar na direção errada. Antes de agir, recomenda perguntas sobre o problema, as informações, os impactos, a urgência e a possibilidade de reverter decisões. Mesmo em crises, oportunidades ou emergências, instantes de reflexão continuam essenciais. Para ele, o planejamento parece caro porque ocorre antes, enquanto o retrabalho permanece escondido. Às vezes, parar por poucos minutos permite chegar mais rápido ao destino certo. Mergulhe no assunto e ouça o episódio completo!

In this episode of BioTalk with Rich Bendis, Rebecca "Becky" Fisher, PhD, Deputy Director for Program Management at the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, joins the conversation to help listeners better understand one of the federal biomedical research funding pathways that may be less familiar to many entrepreneurs, researchers, and life science companies. Dr. Fisher explains how CDMRP works, how it differs from and complements other federal funders such as NIH and ARPA-H, and why its mission is focused on advancing high-impact research that can lead to cures, improved patient care, breakthrough technologies, and clinical benefit. She also discusses the scale and breadth of CDMRP's portfolio, including its FY26 appropriations of $1.27 billion across 34 program areas and additional targeted topics. A major focus of the conversation is CDMRP's unique approach to consumer involvement. Dr. Fisher explains how patients, caregivers, family members, and others with lived experience help shape program strategy, participate in review, and keep funded research connected to the needs of the communities it is intended to serve. The episode also offers practical guidance for applicants. Dr. Fisher walks through how funding opportunities are developed, where to find open program announcements, how the two-tier review process works, and what makes a strong application stand out. She also shares advice for small businesses, academic investigators, clinicians, translational research teams, and industry partners interested in exploring whether CDMRP may be a fit for their work. Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant. Dr. Rebecca "Becky" Fisher currently serves as Deputy Director for Program Management at the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs within the Defense Health Agency, providing senior-level leadership for the successful administration of Congressional appropriations supporting targeted biomedical research. Dr. Fisher has more than 20 years of experience managing and leading complex biomedical research programs within the Department of War. In her current role, she leads CDMRP staff in developing program strategies, facilitating collaborative efforts, and investing funding to further the CDMRP and DoW biomedical research missions. Her work involves extensive engagement with stakeholders from Congress, government, academia, industry, nonprofit, and consumer advocacy organizations. Dr. Fisher received her PhD in Toxicology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and completed a Postdoctoral Cancer Research Training Award Fellowship at the National Cancer Institute.

In this episode, Ricardo discusses rework, one of the most damaging yet invisible costs in projects. Rework occurs when presentations, software, proposals, plans, or decisions must be redone because expectations, requirements, or responsibilities were unclear. Although teams appear busy, they may simply be returning to a point they believed they had already reached—paying multiple times for a result. The later an error is discovered, the greater its impact, which shows that speed does not always mean efficiency. Ricardo highlights avoidable rework caused by haste, poor communication, ambiguous decisions, weak planning, and unvalidated requirements. He suggests measuring not only completed work, but also how much had to be repeated. True efficiency means transforming effort into results with minimal waste. Want to know more? Tune in to the podcast!

Neste episódio, Ricardo aborda o retrabalho, um dos custos mais prejudiciais e, ao mesmo tempo, invisíveis em projetos. O retrabalho ocorre quando apresentações, softwares, propostas, planos ou decisões precisam ser refeitos porque expectativas, requisitos ou responsabilidades não estavam claros. Embora as equipes pareçam ocupadas, elas podem estar simplesmente retornando a um ponto que acreditavam já ter alcançado — pagando várias vezes pelo mesmo resultado. Quanto mais tarde um erro é descoberto, maior é o seu impacto, o que demonstra que velocidade nem sempre significa eficiência. Ricardo destaca o retrabalho evitável causado por pressa, comunicação deficiente, decisões ambíguas, planejamento fraco e requisitos não validados. Ele sugere medir não apenas o trabalho concluído, mas também a quantidade de trabalho que precisou ser repetida. A verdadeira eficiência consiste em transformar esforço em resultados com o mínimo de desperdício. Mergulhe no assunto e ouça o episódio completo!

In this episode, Ricardo explains that projects are promises about a future often experienced by people other than those who originally approved or delivered them. He argues that organizations tend to exaggerate benefits, minimize long-term costs, and focus on schedules, budgets, scope, and acceptance instead of verifying whether promised outcomes materialize. Ricardo highlights the imbalance between those who gain visibility by making promises, those pressured to execute them, and those left to operate solutions and face their consequences. He offers three recommendations: involve the people who will inherit the project from the beginning, document promised benefits as carefully as deliverables, and extend accountability beyond project closure. Ultimately, he says projects must create the future used to justify their existence. Listen to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo explica que projetos são promessas sobre um futuro frequentemente vivenciado por pessoas diferentes daquelas que os aprovaram ou entregaram originalmente. Ele argumenta que as organizações tendem a exagerar nos benefícios, minimizar os custos de longo prazo e concentrar-se em cronogramas, orçamentos, escopo e aceitação, em vez de verificar se os resultados prometidos realmente se concretizam. Ricardo destaca o desequilíbrio entre aqueles que ganham visibilidade ao fazer promessas, aqueles pressionados a executá-las e aqueles que ficam responsáveis ​​por operar as soluções e arcar com suas consequências. Ele apresenta três recomendações: envolver desde o início as pessoas que herdarão o projeto, documentar os benefícios prometidos com o mesmo cuidado dedicado às entregas e estender a responsabilidade para além do encerramento do projeto. Em suma, ele afirma que os projetos devem criar o futuro usado para justificar a sua própria existência. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo reflects on reactions to his newsletter about project management in the age of AI. He stresses that he is not predicting the future but encouraging professionals to question assumptions and prepare for rapid change. Although some readers considered his views alarmist, he argues that learning AI carries little downside: even if its impact is smaller than expected, new skills remain valuable. However, ignoring AI could be risky if organizations continue redesigning structures, PMOs, governance, roles, and teams. Ricardo believes project management will not disappear, but it will evolve significantly. His central concern is helping younger professionals remain relevant, adaptable, and responsible for their choices in a world changing faster than ever before through continuous learning and reflection. Listen to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo reflete sobre as reações à sua newsletter sobre o gerenciamento de projetos na era da inteligência artificial. Ele ressalta que não pretende prever o futuro, mas incentivar os profissionais a questionarem certezas e se prepararem para mudanças rápidas. Embora alguns leitores tenham considerado suas opiniões alarmistas, ele argumenta que aprender sobre IA apresenta poucas desvantagens: mesmo que seu impacto seja menor do que o esperado, as novas competências continuarão valiosas. Entretanto, ignorar a IA pode ser arriscado se as organizações continuarem reformulando estruturas, PMOs, governança, funções e equipes. Ricardo acredita que o gerenciamento de projetos não desaparecerá, mas evoluirá significativamente. Sua principal preocupação é ajudar profissionais mais jovens a permanecerem relevantes, adaptáveis e responsáveis por suas escolhas. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo reflects on how many project managers have shifted from managing projects to merely reacting to urgent matters. Their daily routines are consumed by meetings, messages, emails, and immediate issues, creating a sense of heavy workload but little actual progress. According to him, managing projects means reducing uncertainty, whereas managing anxiety amounts to nothing more than reacting to chaos. Artificial intelligence has accelerated operational tasks but also raised expectations for instant responses, thereby intensifying anxiety within organizations. In this context, the project manager's role becomes even more critical: establishing priorities, shielding the team from false urgencies, creating predictability, making decisions, and instilling confidence. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo reflete sobre como muitos gerentes de projetos deixaram de gerenciar projetos para apenas reagir a urgências. A rotina é consumida por reuniões, mensagens, e-mails e problemas imediatos, gerando a sensação de muito trabalho, mas pouco progresso real. Segundo ele, gerenciar projetos significa reduzir incertezas, enquanto gerenciar ansiedade significa apenas reagir ao caos. A inteligência artificial acelerou tarefas operacionais, mas também aumentou a expectativa por respostas instantâneas, intensificando a ansiedade nas organizações. Nesse contexto, o papel do gerente de projetos torna-se ainda mais importante: estabelecer prioridades, proteger a equipe de falsas urgências, criar previsibilidade, tomar decisões e transmitir confiança. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo discusses the new PMP certification exam. He explains that updating the exam is a natural progression, as project management has evolved with artificial intelligence, agile methods, distributed teams, and new challenges. He highlights that the PMP exam has always prioritized the ability to analyze situations, make decisions, lead teams, and deliver value, rather than simply memorizing concepts. Ricardo also emphasizes that previous versions of the PMBOK® remain relevant because project management fundamentals stay the same, while only the context and tools evolve. His recommendation is to stay up to date without believing that all prior knowledge has lost its value. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo fala sobre o novo exame para a certificação PMP. Ele explica que a atualização do exame é natural, pois a gestão de projetos evoluiu com inteligência artificial, métodos ágeis, equipes distribuídas e novos desafios. Destaca que o exame PMP sempre valorizou a capacidade de analisar situações, tomar decisões, liderar equipes e gerar valor, e não apenas memorizar conceitos. Ricardo também reforça que as versões anteriores do PMBOK continuam relevantes, pois os fundamentos da gestão de projetos permanecem os mesmos, enquanto apenas o contexto e as ferramentas evoluem. Sua recomendação é manter-se atualizado, sem acreditar que todo o conhecimento anterior perdeu valor. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this podcast, Ricardo argues that many projects are not actually late; instead, their schedules were unrealistic from the beginning. He explains that organizations often approve aggressive timelines to satisfy executives, budgets, or customer expectations, only to blame the project team when those plans fail. Ricardo emphasizes that early estimates are always surrounded by uncertainty, making unrealistic forecasts a planning problem rather than an execution issue. While artificial intelligence can quickly generate detailed schedules, its results are only as reliable as the assumptions behind them. Therefore, project managers must challenge deadlines and question key assumptions before approval. Effective planning requires honesty about risks, constraints, capacity, and uncertainty, because expectations alone do not deliver projects—people executing realistic plans do.

Neste podcast, Ricardo questiona uma crença comum no gerenciamento de projetos: nem todo projeto está atrasado; muitas vezes, o cronograma era inviável desde o início. Ele explica que organizações frequentemente aprovam prazos irreais para atender expectativas, orçamentos ou pressões políticas, transferindo depois a responsabilidade para a equipe. Ricardo destaca que previsões iniciais sempre envolvem incertezas e que culpar a execução por falhas de planejamento é um erro. Embora a inteligência artificial ajude a criar cronogramas, ela depende de premissas realistas. Por isso, o gerente de projetos deve desafiar prazos e questionar hipóteses antes da aprovação. Planejar exige honestidade sobre riscos, restrições, capacidade e incertezas, pois expectativas não entregam projetos; pessoas, trabalhando com planos realistas, sim.

In this episode, Ricardo challenges whether traditional two-week Agile sprints still make sense in an era where AI agents can develop, test, review, and improve software in minutes. While Agile principles such as collaboration, adaptability, and customer focus remain essential, their execution may need to evolve. As AI dramatically accelerates software development, the main bottleneck shifts from execution to human decision-making, including prioritization, validation, quality assurance, and risk management. This transformation questions the relevance of fixed sprints, story points, and traditional Agile ceremonies. Ricardo suggests that project managers will increasingly orchestrate AI-driven workflows instead of managing tasks, arguing that human judgment will remain the key competitive advantage in teams where people and AI agents work together. Listen to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo questiona se os tradicionais sprints de duas semanas ainda fazem sentido em um cenário em que agentes de inteligência artificial desenvolvem, testam e corrigem software em minutos. Embora os princípios do Agile permaneçam essenciais, sua execução pode precisar ser reinventada. Com a IA acelerando a implementação, o principal desafio deixa de ser a execução e passa a ser a tomada de decisões, como definir prioridades, validar resultados, garantir qualidade e gerenciar riscos. Nesse novo modelo de desenvolvimento contínuo, o gerente de projetos deixa de controlar tarefas e passa a orquestrar agentes e fluxos de trabalho. O julgamento humano continua sendo o principal diferencial para gerar valor. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

How AI is Democratising and Personalising Affiliate Program Management What actually happens when AI moves from buzzword to something you can use inside an affiliate program every single day?Today, Lee-Ann sits down with Michael Cole, CMO at Everflow, to break down how AI is already changing the way affiliate programs are tracked, managed, and scaled, not in theory, but in real workflows being used today.Michael shares how teams are moving away from developer-heavy processes and instead building lightweight automations, dashboards, and reporting systems directly through AI tools. The shift in using AI is not about replacing people but instead removing the bottlenecks that stop affiliate managers from doing higher-value work.Michael also explains where AI breaks down, why judgment still sits firmly with humans, and how affiliate managers can finally reclaim time for strategy, partner growth, and relationship building instead of drowning in reporting and admin tasks.You can find a variety of AI Use Case Recipes at https://www.everflow.io/ai-playbook. Key Talking Points on AI Affiliate Program Management How AI is enabling affiliate managers to build tools without developersWhy API-first platforms are becoming more powerful in an AI-driven workflowWhere AI fails: judgment, nuance, and decision-making under contextWhy affiliate managers should focus less on admin and more on relationshipsHow “headless” systems are changing how data is used across teamsThe future of affiliate management roles in AI-powered environmentsFrom Manual Reporting to AI-Driven Affiliate Program Management Affiliate management has traditionally been weighed down by reporting, spreadsheets, and manual data pulls. Michael Cole explains how AI is changing that dynamic by allowing teams to build lightweight automation layers on top of existing platforms like Everflow.Instead of waiting for development cycles, affiliate managers can now generate dashboards, connect systems like HubSpot or Slack, and automate weekly reporting using simple AI-assisted workflows. The biggest shift isn't just speed, it's control. Managers can finally design reporting structures that reflect how they actually think about performance, not how tools force them to report it.This unlocks a more precise understanding of affiliate performance, including deeper attribution, behavioral signals, and revenue impact beyond surface-level metrics.Why AI in Affiliate Marketing Still Needs Human Judgment While AI is powerful at processing data and generating outputs, Michael is clear on one point: it lacks judgment. AI can summarize, analyse, and connect systems, but it struggles with context, nuance, and decision-making. A drop in performance might be seasonal, strategic, or completely normal but AI alone can misinterpret that without human direction.This is why the role of the affiliate manager is shifting, not disappearing. The focus is moving away from repetitive admin tasks and toward higher-value work: interpreting insights, managing relationships, and deciding what actually matters for growth.The real opportunity is not automation replacing people, it's automation clearing space for better decisions.Listen to Learn More About AI for Affiliate Managers How affiliate managers are building custom tools without developersReal-world examples of AI-powered reporting inside EverflowWhy AI struggles with context and judgment in performance analysisHow headless systems are changing affiliate data accessWhy the future of affiliate management is more strategic, not less humanTimestamps[03:47] How AI enables non-developers to build automation workflows[08:40] Why AI coding in spreadsheets is becoming a core workflow[12:38] How affiliate managers are using AI for reporting and CS insights[15:34] What “headless” means for affiliate platforms like Everflow[23:49] Where affiliate managers should start with AI adoption[31:30] The future of SaaS, APIs, and AI-built affiliate systemsListen to the Full Affiliate Marketing Podcast Episode AI is already reshaping how affiliate programs are built and managed but the real shift isn't technical, it's operational.This episode with Michael Cole from Everflow breaks down how affiliate managers can move from manual reporting to intelligent, AI-assisted workflows that free up time for strategy, partner development, and performance growth.If you're working in affiliate marketing, this is the moment to understand what AI actually changes inside your day-to-day role and where it doesn't. Learn more about Everflow: https://www.everflow.io.Sign up for the Affiverse Newsletter at affiversemedia.comAlready subscribed? Share this episode with any affiliate, operator, or affiliate manager working to build trust in online gaming.Subscribe to the Affiliate Marketing Podcast on Apple PodcastsSubscribe to gain insights into scaling campaigns with accountability, sensitivity, and trust, even in the era of AI and automation.Click here to rate and review, scroll to the bottom, tap to rate with five stars, and select "Write a Review."Send me a text with your questions

In this episode, Ricardo presents three practical applications of AI agents in project management. Unlike tools that only answer questions, these agents act autonomously, monitoring information and executing tasks. The first example is the risk agent, capable of identifying problems in messages, classifying their severity, updating records, and suggesting responses. The second is the status and reporting agent, which collects data from various sources, updates indicators, and automatically generates reports, allowing the manager to focus on analysis. The third is the planning and forecasting agent, which tracks project progress, identifies trends, performs simulations, and anticipates problems. Ricardo concludes that these agents not only automate tasks but transform the nature of project management work. Listen to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo apresenta três aplicações práticas de agentes de IA no gerenciamento de projetos. Diferentemente de ferramentas que apenas respondem a perguntas, os agentes atuam de forma autônoma, monitorando informações e executando tarefas. O primeiro exemplo é o agente de riscos, capaz de identificar problemas em mensagens, classificar sua gravidade, atualizar registros e sugerir respostas. O segundo é o agente de status e relatórios, que coleta dados de diversas fontes, atualiza indicadores e gera relatórios automaticamente, permitindo que o gerente foque na análise. O terceiro é o agente de planejamento e previsão, que acompanha o progresso do projeto, identifica tendências, realiza simulações e antecipa problemas. Ricardo conclui que os agentes não apenas automatizam tarefas, mas transformam a natureza do trabalho do gerenciamento de projetos. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo compares a project to a disorganized email inbox, full of messages, decisions, and pending tasks without proper handling. He explains that many projects don't face difficulties due to a lack of resources or schedule flaws, but because of the accumulation of actions, risks, requests, and decisions without follow-up. To deal with this problem, he presents the principles of the GTD (Getting Things Done) methodology, created by David Allen, which is based on the idea that the human mind should generate ideas, not store them. Ricardo highlights five fundamental steps: capturing information, clarifying necessary actions, organizing responsibilities, regularly reviewing records, and executing priorities. Applied to projects, these principles help reduce chaos, increase productivity, and improve decision-making. Listen to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo compara um projeto a uma caixa de e-mails desorganizada, repleta de mensagens, decisões e pendências sem tratamento adequado. Ele explica que muitos projetos não enfrentam dificuldades por falta de recursos ou por falhas no cronograma, mas pelo acúmulo de ações, riscos, solicitações e decisões sem acompanhamento. Para lidar com esse problema, apresenta os princípios da metodologia GTD (Getting Things Done), criada por David Allen, que parte da ideia de que a mente humana deve gerar ideias, e não armazená-las. Ricardo destaca cinco etapas fundamentais: capturar informações, esclarecer ações necessárias, organizar responsabilidades, revisar regularmente os registros e executar as prioridades. Aplicados aos projetos, esses princípios ajudam a reduzir o caos, aumentar a produtividade e melhorar a tomada de decisões. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

 Wg Cdr Vandana Chaudhary | (Retd) Indian Air Force Officer  Wing Commander Vandana(Retd) is a veteran with 15 years of cross-functional leadership in the Indian Air Force as a Meteorological Officer. She has earned a wealth of multifaceted experience where she championed key functions, mainly Public Relations, Administration, and Program Management, infusing each endeavor with unwavering passion and commitment.Through her contributions in the social sector, she has strived for almost a decade to empower women, children with disabilities, and people below the poverty line, promoting overall well-being and stability in society.She has been committed to inclusivity, empathy & empowerment long before they became trendy terms in the market. By enabling a culture of collaboration and mutual respect, she built cohesive cross-functional teams capable of navigating uncertainty with resilience and grace. Whether managing significant budgets or directing complex projects, she has always approached her responsibilities with a blend of strategic foresight and hands-on leadership.Beyond work hours, she is an explorer who enjoys traveling and reading, deeply attuned to the tranquility of nature. With a penchant for observation, she explores the intricacies of human behavior, reflecting on life's purpose beyond mere existence. She also enjoys acquiring new skills that enrich her personal and professional life.As she moves on to the next chapter of her career, she is excited to leverage her military experience to make a difference by steering organizational growth and driving transformative change wherever she works. 

In this podcast, Ricardo explores the emerging concept of the “one-person project,” made possible by advances in artificial intelligence, automation, and digital platforms. He challenges the traditional belief that complex projects require large teams, noting that bigger teams also increase coordination efforts, communication overhead, and dependencies. Drawing on Brooks' Law, he explains that adding more people does not always improve productivity. Today, a single professional can perform tasks that once required entire teams, raising the question of whether projects should be delivered by the smallest effective team possible. However, he also highlights risks such as knowledge concentration and reduced diversity of perspectives. Finally, Ricardo expands the discussion to the future of work, questioning how society will adapt if fewer people are needed to achieve greater results. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo reflete sobre a crescente possibilidade de projetos serem executados por uma única pessoa graças ao avanço da inteligência artificial, da automação e das plataformas digitais. Ele destaca que, tradicionalmente, projetos complexos exigiam grandes equipes, mas que o aumento do número de pessoas também amplia os esforços de coordenação, comunicação e alinhamento. Com as novas tecnologias, um profissional pode realizar atividades que antes demandavam equipes inteiras, tornando possível reduzir o tamanho dos times sem comprometer os resultados. Contudo, esse modelo traz riscos, como a concentração de conhecimento e a redução da diversidade de perspectivas. Ricardo amplia a discussão para o futuro do trabalho, questionando os impactos sociais e econômicos de um cenário em que cada vez menos pessoas sejam necessárias para produzir mais resultados. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo presents Brooks' Law, created over 50 years ago and still very relevant. The law states that adding people to a software project that is behind schedule tends to delay it even further. This is because new members need to be trained and mentored by more experienced members, reducing team productivity. Furthermore, increasing the number of people makes communication, coordination, and integration of deliverables more complex. Ricardo emphasizes that this concept remains valid in the age of artificial intelligence, as adding more tools, agents, or automations does not solve problems of priorities, processes, or governance. Often, the solution lies in removing obstacles, simplifying decisions, and improving work coordination. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo apresenta a Lei de Brooks, criada há mais de 50 anos e ainda muito relevante. A lei afirma que adicionar pessoas a um projeto de software, que está atrasado, tende a atrasá-lo ainda mais. Isso ocorre porque os novos integrantes precisam ser treinados e orientados pelos membros mais experientes, reduzindo a produtividade da equipe. Além disso, o aumento do número de pessoas torna a comunicação, a coordenação e a integração das entregas mais complexas. Ricardo destaca que esse conceito continua válido na era da inteligência artificial, pois adicionar mais ferramentas, agentes ou automações não resolve problemas de prioridades, processos ou governança. Muitas vezes, a solução está em remover obstáculos, simplificar decisões e melhorar a coordenação do trabalho. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo discusses the main misunderstandings about the eighth edition of the PMBOK Guide. He explains that the PMI has not abandoned traditional management nor transformed everything into agile, but has begun to integrate predictive, hybrid, and adaptive approaches in a more intelligent way. Ricardo emphasizes that governance, cost control, scheduling, and leadership remain essential, but are now applied in more complex and dynamic environments. He also clarifies that artificial intelligence appears as a support tool, not as a replacement for human leadership. Another important point is that no framework solves cultural problems or management failures on its own. According to Ricardo, the new PMBOK seeks to connect execution and value creation, reducing conflict between methodologies and encouraging adaptation to the real context of projects. Listen to the podcast to learn more about! * The opinions presented in this podcast reflect solely the personal views of Ricardo and do not necessarily represent the position of PMI. This episode has no sponsorship, support, or institutional affiliation with any organization.

Neste episódio, Ricardo comenta os principais mal-entendidos sobre a oitava edição do PMBOK Guide. Ele explica que o PMI não abandonou a gestão tradicional nem transformou tudo em ágil, mas passou a integrar abordagens preditivas, híbridas e adaptativas de forma mais inteligente. Ricardo destaca que governança, controle de custos, cronograma e liderança continuam essenciais, porém agora aplicados em ambientes mais complexos e dinâmicos. Ele também esclarece que a inteligência artificial aparece como ferramenta de apoio, não como substituição da liderança humana. Outro ponto importante é que nenhum framework resolve problemas culturais ou falhas de gestão sozinho. Segundo Ricardo, o novo PMBOK busca conectar execução e geração de valor, reduzindo o conflito entre metodologias e incentivando adaptação ao contexto real dos projetos. Escute o podcast para saber mais! * As opiniões apresentadas neste podcast refletem exclusivamente a visão pessoal de Ricardo e não representam, necessariamente, o posicionamento do PMI. Este episódio não possui patrocínio, apoio ou vínculo institucional com qualquer organização.

In this episode, Ricardo explains that career growth in project management is not defined only by technical skills, certifications, or tools. Often, the most important moments are brief, unexpected interactions during crises or difficult conversations. In these situations, leaders observe who remains calm, simplifies chaos, communicates clearly, takes responsibility, and helps others make decisions. While technical competence is essential, trust, confidence, and leadership under pressure become the true differentiators as careers evolve. With artificial intelligence automating many technical tasks, human abilities such as judgment, communication, and decision-making in uncertain situations are becoming even more valuable. Sometimes, a career-changing moment may last only a few minutes. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo explica que o crescimento na carreira de gestão de projetos não se define apenas por habilidades técnicas, certificações ou ferramentas. Muitas vezes, os momentos mais importantes são interações breves e inesperadas durante crises ou conversas difíceis. Nessas situações, os líderes observam quem mantém a calma, simplifica o caos, comunica-se com clareza, assume a responsabilidade e ajuda os outros a tomar decisões. Embora a competência técnica seja essencial, a confiança e a liderança sob pressão tornam-se os verdadeiros diferenciais à medida que as carreiras evoluem. Com a inteligência artificial automatizando muitas tarefas técnicas, habilidades humanas como julgamento, comunicação e tomada de decisão em situações incertas tornam-se ainda mais valiosas. Às vezes, um momento que pode mudar a carreira dura apenas alguns minutos. Escute o podcast pra saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo Vargas discusses "Watermelon Projects": projects that appear healthy on dashboards but face serious internal problems. He explains that often, indicators remain green for fear of exposing difficulties, disappointing sponsors, or suffering punishment in corporate cultures that associate problems with personal failure. Thus, delays, risks, and scope cuts end up being masked. Ricardo warns that the greatest danger is not a red project, but an artificially green one, as problems grow silently until they become critical. He emphasizes that dashboards reflect organizational behaviors and culture. For him, healthy projects are not those without problems, but those where the team feels safe to discuss difficulties early, transparently, and without fear. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo fala sobre os “Watermelon Projects”: projetos que parecem saudáveis nos dashboards, mas enfrentam sérios problemas internamente. Ele explica que, muitas vezes, os indicadores permanecem verdes por medo de expor dificuldades, decepcionar patrocinadores ou sofrer punições em culturas corporativas que associam problemas ao fracasso pessoal. Assim, atrasos, riscos e cortes de escopo acabam sendo mascarados. Ricardo alerta que o maior perigo não é um projeto vermelho, mas sim um projeto artificialmente verde, pois os problemas crescem silenciosamente até se tornarem críticos. Ele destaca que dashboards refletem comportamentos e cultura organizacional. Para ele, projetos saudáveis não são os que não possuem problemas, mas aqueles onde a equipe tem segurança para discutir dificuldades cedo, com transparência e sem medo. Escute o podcast pra saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo questions the effectiveness of traditional project planning tools, based on static plans. Although fundamental for decades, these plans quickly become obsolete in dynamic environments. He highlights that Artificial Intelligence transforms this scenario by allowing continuous forecasting and real-time adjustments, replacing fixed estimates with dynamic, data-driven analyses. With this, the focus shifts from following a plan to adapting to change. Current tools still lack this predictive intelligence, which can compromise their relevance. The role of the project manager also changes: from planner to critical and strategic analyst. Despite the benefits, there are risks, such as excessive reliance on AI and decisions based on inaccurate data. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Neste episódio, Ricardo questiona a eficácia das ferramentas tradicionais de planejamento de projetos, baseadas em planos estáticos. Embora tenham sido fundamentais por décadas, esses planos rapidamente se tornam obsoletos em ambientes dinâmicos. Ele destaca que a Inteligência Artificial transforma esse cenário ao permitir previsões contínuas e ajustes em tempo real, substituindo estimativas fixas por análises dinâmicas baseadas em dados. Com isso, o foco deixa de ser seguir um plano e passa a ser adaptar-se às mudanças. As ferramentas atuais ainda carecem dessa inteligência preditiva, o que pode comprometer sua relevância. O papel do gerente de projetos também muda: de planejador para analista crítico e estratégico. Apesar dos benefícios, há riscos, como dependência excessiva da IA e decisões baseadas em dados imprecisos. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo discusses KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). He explains that KPIs are essential metrics that support decision-making in projects, unlike general metrics that only report data. Effective KPIs help anticipate problems, expedite decisions, and align teams and stakeholders. Examples for schedule performance include the percentage of tasks completed on time, the planned versus scheduled duration, the SPI (Schedule Performance Index), and the average delay per delivery. For cost, the CPI (Cost Performance Index) and cost variance measure efficiency. Beyond schedule and cost, strategic KPIs are essential, such as rework rate, value delivered, adherence to the business plan, and stakeholder satisfaction, as projects can meet time and budget targets and still fail. Ricardo recommends using a few meaningful KPIs, tracking trends, updating them frequently, and avoiding superficial metrics that don't guide decisions. Tune in to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo fala sobre KPIs (Key Performance Indicators - Indicadores-Chave de Desempenho). Ele explica que os KPIs são métricas essenciais que apoiam a tomada de decisões em projetos, ao contrário das métricas gerais que apenas reportam dados. KPIs eficazes ajudam a antecipar problemas, agilizar decisões e alinhar equipes e stakeholders. Exemplos para desempenho de cronograma incluem a porcentagem de tarefas concluídas no prazo, a duração prevista versus a duração programada, o SPI (Índice de Desempenho do Cronograma) e o atraso médio por entrega. Para custo, o CPI (Índice de Desempenho de Custo) e a variação de custo medem a eficiência. Além de cronograma e custo, KPIs estratégicos são essenciais, como taxa de retrabalho, valor entregue, aderência ao plano de negócios e satisfação dos stakeholders, pois os projetos podem atingir as metas de tempo e orçamento e ainda assim falhar. Ricardo recomenda usar alguns KPIs significativos, acompanhar tendências, atualizá-los frequentemente e evitar métricas superficiais que não orientam as decisões. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo explains that rework is an invisible yet highly destructive problem in projects. Although organizations measure schedule, cost, and scope, they rarely monitor rework, the effort spent correcting already completed work. This lack of measurement obscures the project's true efficiency. Rework often stems from deeper problems, such as unclear requirements, misalignment among stakeholders, late decisions, or low initial quality. Its impact is significant: delays increase, costs rise, teams become exhausted, and client confidence decreases. Ricardo argues that rework should be treated as a key performance indicator, continuously monitored to assess the project's health. When measured, it drives better behaviors, improving quality, decision-making, and alignment. Ultimately, projects fail not only due to delays but also due to wasted effort, with rework being one of the main hidden factors contributing to this failure. Tune in to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo explica que o retrabalho é um problema invisível, porém altamente destrutivo, em projetos. Embora as organizações meçam cronograma, custo e escopo, raramente monitoram o retrabalho, o esforço gasto corrigindo o trabalho já concluído. Essa falta de mensuração oculta a verdadeira eficiência do projeto. O retrabalho frequentemente decorre de problemas mais profundos, como requisitos pouco claros, desalinhamento entre as partes interessadas, decisões tardias ou baixa qualidade inicial. Seu impacto é significativo: atrasos aumentam, custos sobem, as equipes ficam exaustas e a confiança do cliente diminui. Ricardo argumenta que o retrabalho deve ser tratado como um indicador-chave de desempenho, monitorado continuamente para avaliar a saúde do projeto. Quando mensurado, ele impulsiona melhores comportamentos, melhorando a qualidade, a tomada de decisões e o alinhamento. Em última análise, os projetos falham não apenas devido a atrasos, mas também devido ao desperdício de esforço, sendo o retrabalho um dos principais fatores ocultos que contribuem para esse fracasso. Ouça o episódio completo para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo discusses how artificial intelligence is transforming project management by moving beyond being just a tool and becoming an active agent in decision-making and execution. He highlights the emergence of new, unpredictable, and difficult-to-control risks that can arise from the interaction between systems. He also emphasizes concerns about manipulation and cybersecurity, since AI can both protect and attack. This scenario challenges traditional risk management practices. In response, he suggests continuous monitoring, controls focused on detection and rapid response, and reinforcing human responsibility. Despite the benefits, understanding these new risks has become essential. Tune in to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo aborda como a inteligência artificial está transformando o gerenciamento de projetos ao deixar de ser apenas uma ferramenta e passar a atuar como agente ativo nas decisões e na execução. Ele destaca o surgimento de riscos emergentes, imprevisíveis e difíceis de controlar, que podem surgir da interação entre sistemas. Também enfatiza preocupações com manipulação e cibersegurança, já que a IA pode tanto proteger quanto atacar. Esse cenário desafia práticas tradicionais de gestão de riscos. Como resposta, ele sugere monitoramento contínuo, controles focados em detecção e resposta rápida e o reforço da responsabilidade humana. Apesar dos benefícios, compreender esses novos riscos tornou-se essencial. Ouça o episódio completo para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo discusses anxiety in project management, a subtle yet pervasive risk that undermines performance. Constant urgency creates pressure-driven cultures in which clarity fades, and teams react rather than think. Under anxiety, decision quality declines: people choose speed over sound judgment, avoid difficult conversations, hesitate to escalate issues, and mistake activity for real progress. Overwhelm also causes risk blindness, with warning signs ignored and problems delayed. Organizations often respond by increasing control through more meetings and reporting, which only intensifies the cycle. To address this, leaders must acknowledge anxiety as systemic, slow down critical decisions, and foster psychological safety so issues surface early. Ultimately, projects depend on people, and sustained pressure leads to poorer outcomes and reduces long-term value and well-being. Tune in to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo discute a ansiedade na gestão de projetos, um risco sutil, porém generalizado, que prejudica o desempenho. A urgência constante cria culturas orientadas pela pressão, nas quais a clareza se perde e as equipes reagem em vez de pensar. Sob ansiedade, a qualidade das decisões diminui: as pessoas priorizam a velocidade em detrimento do bom senso, evitam conversas difíceis, hesitam em escalar problemas e confundem atividade com progresso real. A sobrecarga também causa cegueira ao risco, com sinais de alerta ignorados e problemas adiados. As organizações frequentemente respondem aumentando o controle por meio de mais reuniões e relatórios, o que apenas intensifica o ciclo. Para lidar com isso, os líderes devem reconhecer a ansiedade como sistêmica, desacelerar as decisões críticas e promover a segurança psicológica para que os problemas venham à tona precocemente. Em última análise, os projetos dependem das pessoas, e a pressão constante leva a resultados piores e reduz o valor e o bem-estar a longo prazo. Ouça o episódio completo para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo discusses the growing use of AI agents in projects and highlights an essential point: decisions can be automated, but responsibility remains human. Tools such as collaborative platforms and automation engines already perform tasks, prioritize activities, and interact with stakeholders autonomously. Despite their efficiency, there is an illusion that responsibility can also be transferred to AI, which is not true. In case of error, the responsibility falls on whoever designed the system. Thus, the manager's role evolves, it goes from simply executing to designing decision-making systems, defining limits, and validating logic. The recommendation is clear: automate tasks, support decisions, but never delegate responsibility. Tune in to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo aborda o crescente uso de agentes de IA nos projetos e destaca um ponto essencial: decisões podem ser automatizadas, mas a responsabilidade continua sendo humana. Ferramentas como plataformas colaborativas e motores de automação já executam tarefas, priorizam atividades e interagem com stakeholders de forma autônoma. Apesar da eficiência, surge a ilusão de que a responsabilidade também pode ser transferida à IA, o que não é verdade. Em caso de erro, a responsabilidade recai sobre quem projetou o sistema. Assim, o papel do gestor evolui, deixa de apenas executar e passa a desenhar sistemas de decisão, definir limites e validar lógicas. A recomendação é clara: automatize tarefas, apoie decisões, mas nunca delegue a responsabilidade. Ouça o episódio completo para saber mais!

In this episode, Ricardo explains that projects age not only over time but also when they lose energy, relevance, and purpose. Many continue to be taken for granted, even as markets, technology, and priorities change. He warns that past investments do not justify continuing, as they do not guarantee future value. Signs of aging include a lack of clarity about the purpose, low team motivation, and decisions based on outdated assumptions. Reviewing or even ending a project is not a failure, but demonstrates leadership. Maintaining “zombie” projects consumes valuable resources. Therefore, leaders must continually assess whether the project remains viable, delivers value, and aligns with current realities. Listen to the podcast to learn more!

Neste episódio, Ricardo explica que projetos também envelhecem, não apenas com o tempo, mas também quando perdem energia, relevância e propósito. Muitos continuam sem questionar, mesmo diante de mudanças no mercado, na tecnologia e nas prioridades. Ele alerta que investimentos passados não justificam continuar, pois não garantem valor futuro. Sinais de envelhecimento incluem falta de clareza quanto ao propósito, baixa motivação da equipe e decisões baseadas em premissas antigas. Revisar ou até encerrar um projeto não é um fracasso, e sim demonstra liderança. Manter projetos “zumbis” consome recursos valiosos. Por isso, líderes devem avaliar constantemente se o projeto ainda faz sentido, gera valor e está alinhado à realidade atual. Escute o podcast para saber mais!

Superpowers for Good should not be considered investment advice. Seek counsel before making investment decisions. When you purchase an item, launch a campaign or create an investment account after clicking a link here, we may earn a fee. Engage to support our work.Watch the show on television by downloading the e360tv channel app to your Roku, LG or AmazonFireTV. You can also see it on YouTube.Devin: What is your superpower?Jane: If something goes poorly, I'm like, okay, how can we fix this?Rob: I don't really accept constraints... I want to always find a way around the issue.Imagine a drive-thru where you can order your favorite coffee with a single app click, arrive at the pickup spot, and leave in seconds—no line, no waiting, no tipping. This seamless experience is the vision of Jane Lo and Rob Whitten, co-founders of p!ng, a fully automated drive-thru system designed to solve the inefficiencies of traditional drive-thrus.The idea was born out of frustration. Rob, a robotics expert and father of three, described how bad drive-thru experiences with his daughters inspired the project. “My three daughters made me go through a bunch of drive-throughs. It was a terrible experience, and Jane told me to stop complaining one day and just fix it,” he shared. Jane, a marketing and customer experience expert, immediately saw the potential. Together, they combined their skills to create what Rob calls “the nerd's revenge for bad drive-throughs.”The technology behind p!ng is as impressive as its simplicity. Customers use an app to place their orders, which are prepared only when they approach the pickup location. Sensors and geofencing track vehicles, ensuring orders are ready precisely when needed. Rob explained, “We wanted you to leave p!ng feeling victorious and like you're living in the future. It's nice and simple on the surface, but underneath, there's a bunch of really cool tech happening.”Jane and Rob's innovative system is already making waves among consumers, who appreciate the speed and ease of the experience. “Our customers were like, ‘This is amazing. Why doesn't this already exist?'” Jane said. Yet, traditional venture capitalists often didn't understand the scope of the problem. “If you're someone wealthier, you probably have an assistant or a fancy espresso machine. You're not likely to be in that drive-thru lane,” she explained.To fund their vision of revolutionizing drive-thru convenience, the pair turned to regulated investment crowdfunding on Wefunder, where everyday people can invest in their mission. “It's awesome because good customers make great investors and vice versa,” Rob noted.By combining cutting-edge robotics with a deep understanding of customer needs, Jane and Rob aren't just solving a problem—they're creating an entirely new experience. p!ng shows how innovation and impact can work hand in hand to redefine convenience.tl;dr:Jane Lo and Rob Whitten founded p!ng to create a frictionless, fully automated drive-thru experience.They combined expertise in robotics and customer experience to revolutionize how people get coffee.Traditional VCs didn't see the problem, so they turned to crowdfunding to fund their vision.Jane's adaptability and Rob's determination to overcome constraints drive their ability to innovate.p!ng's technology simplifies the customer experience while showcasing the potential of robotics.How to Develop Adaptability and Problem Solving As a SuperpowerJane and Rob's superpowers center on adaptability and a refusal to accept limits. Jane describes herself as an “adapter,” someone who embraces change and thrives in uncertain situations. “If something goes poorly, I'm like, okay, how can we fix this?” she explained. Rob, on the other hand, described his ability to challenge constraints: “I don't really accept constraints... I want to always find a way around the issue.” Together, these superpowers enable them to tackle challenges head-on and innovate in ways others might overlook.When Jane was recovering from hip replacement surgery, she adapted by learning to solder at home so she could contribute to p!ng's pilot project. “We made like a hundred of them or something,” she said, referring to the wiring components she assembled. Meanwhile, Rob shared his story of running a two-football-field-long hose to solve a water shortage during a robotics test at Amazon, demonstrating his determination to overcome obstacles quickly and creatively.Tips for Developing the Superpower:Push your boundaries by tackling things you fear or find uncomfortable.Embrace change as an opportunity for growth rather than something to avoid.Interrogate constraints instead of accepting them—ask “how can I solve this?” rather than “can I?”Use AI tools creatively to brainstorm and find out-of-the-box solutions.Focus on the next step instead of dwelling on failures or setbacks.By following Jane and Rob's example and advice, you can make adaptability and problem solving a skill. With practice and effort, you could make it a superpower that enables you to do more good in the world.Remember, however, that research into success suggests that building on your own superpowers is more important than creating new ones or overcoming weaknesses. You do you!Invest in Ending Organ Shortages!Guest ProfileJane Lo (she/her):Co-founder, p!ngAbout p!ng: p!ng is the fastest autonomous coffee drive-thru in the galaxy — a compact, robotics and AI-powered pod that serves premium specialty drinks in under a minute with virtually no wait and a radically better customer experience. Designed by veterans of Amazon Robotics, iRobot, and SharkNinja, p!ng delivers the speed, consistency, and convenience today's on-the-go consumers crave, whether that's during the chaotic morning rush or afternoon beverage side quest.Website: pingthru.comCompany Facebook Page: facebook.com/pingthrucoffeeCompany Instagram Handle: @pingthrucoffee Other URL: wefunder.com/pingBiographical Information: I grew up in the Bay Area and after graduating from UC Berkeley, began my career in healthcare consulting and biotech. These experiences made one thing clear: I wanted to work as close to the end consumer as possible. I returned to school to earn my MBA from The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, then moved into product marketing, brand marketing, and media production for consumer brands including Samsonite and SharkNinja. I met Rob, my co-founder, at SharkNinja, working on the same kitchen appliances development team. I found my true passion in Customer Experience analytics at Forrester Research, heading up a team of analysts and working as an advisor to Fortune 500 executives. I used data to show companies how well they are delivering for customers (or not), and what they could do to improve. Over time, I realized that even with good intentions and well-resourced teams, many companies struggle to create real change. Today, I use my love of working with and understanding customers to build joy-inducing experiences that make everyday life better.LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jane-lo-pingRob Whitten (he/him)Co-founder, p!ngBiographical Information: Rob Whitten is the co‑founder of p!ng, the wicked fast robotic coffee drive‑thru. Raised in Loudon, NH, he attended West Point and served as an Army infantry officer before settling in Billerica, MA in 2004.With a degree in Systems Engineering and a Master's in Program Management, Rob has spent his career solving complex problems across defense, consumer electronics, and e‑commerce. He has led high‑performing teams at BAE Systems, iRobot, SharkNinja, and Amazon Robotics, working on projects including autonomous manipulation, robotics sortation, and grocery automation.In 2023, frustrated by long drive‑thru experiences with his daughters, he co‑founded p!ng to reinvent the model through automation.Outside of work, Rob enjoys riding his Harley with Jane, competing in triathlons, skiing, hiking, traveling, cooking, and crafting epic Star Wars lawn decorations.LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/rob-whitten-pingthruInvest in Career Success!Support Our SponsorsOur generous sponsors make our work possible, serving impact investors, social entrepreneurs, community builders and diverse founders. Today's advertisers include rHealth, Frontier Bio, and Rise Up at Work. Learn more about advertising with us here.Max-Impact Members(We're grateful for every one of these community champions who make this work possible.)Brian Christie, Brainsy | Cameron Neil, Lend For Good | Carol Fineagan, Independent Consultant | Hiten Sonpal, RISE Robotics | John Berlet, CORE Tax Deeds, LLC. | Justin Starbird, The Aebli Group | Lory Moore, Lory Moore Law | Marcia Brinton, High Desert Gear | Mark Grimes, Networked Enterprise Development | Matthew Mead, Hempitecture | Michael Pratt, Qnetic | Mike Green, Envirosult | Nick Degnan, Unlimit Ventures | Dr. Nicole Paulk, Siren Biotechnology | Paul Lovejoy, Stakeholder Enterprise | Pearl Wright, Global Changemaker | Scott Thorpe, Philanthropist | Sharon Samjitsingh, Health Care Originals | Add Your Name HereUpcoming SuperCrowd Event CalendarIf a location is not noted, the events below are virtual.Superpowers for Good Live Pitch – Private Investor Session: Immediately following the March 17, 2026, live broadcast at 8 PM ET / 5 PM PT, investors are invited to join an exclusive private Zoom session to engage directly with the presenting founders—BRG Therapeutics (Dale Walker), GigaWatt (Deep Patel), My Diabetes Health (Dr. Prem Sahasranam), and rHEALTH (Eugene Chan). In this dedicated off-air environment, participants can ask deeper questions about strategy, traction, deal terms, and impact while exploring their active Regulation Crowdfunding campaigns in real time. Watch the live pitches on Roku, Amazon Fire TV, LG Smart TVs via e360tv, LinkedIn, YouTube, or Facebook—then continue the conversation in the private investor session where capital and clarity come together. Register free to get access to both events.SuperCrowd Impact Member Networking Session: Impact (and, of course, Max-Impact) Members of the SuperCrowd are invited to a private networking session on March 17th at 1:30 PM ET/10:30 AM PT. Mark your calendar. We'll send private emails to Impact Members with registration details. Upgrade to Impact Membership today!SuperCrowdHour March: This month, Devin Thorpe will explore how investors can align profit with purpose in a powerful session titled “Why You Should Make Money with Impact Crowdfunding.” As CEO and Founder of The Super Crowd, Inc., Devin will share practical insights on generating financial returns while driving measurable social and environmental impact through regulated investment crowdfunding. Register free to get all the details. March 18th at Noon ET/9:00 PT.SuperCrowd26 featuring PurposeBuilt100™: This August 25–27, founders, investors, and ecosystem leaders will gather for a three-day, broadcast-quality global experience focused on disciplined capital formation, regulated investment crowdfunding, and purpose-driven growth. We're bringing together leading voices in impact investing, compliance, digital marketing, and circular economy innovation to deliver practical frameworks, real-world case studies, and actionable strategies. The event culminates in the PurposeBuilt100™ Showcase, recognizing 100 of the fastest-growing purpose-driven companies in the U.S. Register now to secure your seat and get all the details. August 25–27, streaming worldwide.Share the application for the PurposeBuilt100™: Purpose-driven founders deserve recognition. The PurposeBuilt100™ application window is now open—celebrating the fastest-growing companies building profit with purpose. If you know a founder creating real impact and real growth, please share this opportunity. Applications are free and confidential. Explore the program and apply today: PurposeBuilt100.com.Community Event CalendarSuccessful Funding with Karl Dakin, Tuesdays at 10:00 AM ET - Click on Events.Nominate your MedTech, BioTech or Life Sciences company for the prestigious TAG Awards. The deadline is quickly approaching! Apply before March 13! Use the discount code SUPERPOWER to save 20%!Save the Date! October 20th and 21st will be the Crowdfunding Professional Association Regulated Investment Crowdfunding Summit for 2026. This is the event of the year for everyone in the crowdfunding ecosystem.If you would like to submit an event for us to share with the 10,000+ changemakers, investors and entrepreneurs who are members of the SuperCrowd, click here.Manage the volume of emails you receive from us by clicking here.We use AI to help us write compelling recaps of each episode. Get full access to Superpowers for Good at www.superpowers4good.com/subscribe

In this episode, Ricardo discusses the importance of maintaining rhythm, not hysteria, for projects to be sustainable. He explains that many organizations confuse productivity with a chaotic environment full of emergencies, constant meetings, and changing priorities. This scenario only creates the sensation of movement but doesn't guarantee real progress. For Ricardo, rhythm means consistency, cadence, and continuous advancement with focus and energy, while hysteria puts the project in a permanent state of emergency. This generates fatigue, worsens decision-making, and reduces the quality of work. He emphasizes that projects are made by people and that exhausted teams lose motivation and make more mistakes. Therefore, leaders must define clear priorities, respect the team's capacity, and create a sustainable environment to achieve consistent results. Listen to the podcast to learn more about!

Cisco is bringing renewed focus to wireless certifications — and major updates are coming in March 2026. In this episode of the Cisco Learning Network Podcast, Cisco Learning Network Community Manager Tanner Swift sits down with Andrew Richter, Content Engineering and Program Management lead focused on Wireless and Enterprise Networking, to discuss what's changing across the wireless certification track. Together, they break down the introduction of the new Wireless Core exam, updates to the CCNP Wireless pathway, changes to the CCIE Wireless practical exam, and what these updates mean for current certification holders. They also explore why these changes are happening now, how industry feedback shaped the new direction, and where learners can find study resources to prepare. Whether you're already working toward a wireless certification or just curious about where Cisco wireless learning is headed, this episode gives you the context and clarity you need to navigate the road ahead.