Podcasts about spoliation

Les invité-e-s :Eric Le Bourhis, historien (INALCO)Sarah Gensburger, sociologue et historienne (CNRS) Le livre : Isabelle Backouche, Sarah Gensburger, Eric Le Bourhis, Appartements témoins. La spoliation des locataires juifs à Paris, 1940-1946, Paris, La découverte, 2025. La discussion :La spoliation des locataires, un fait historique jusqu'ici invisible (00:00)Les appartements juifs comme variable d'ajustement de l'immobilier parisien (9:15)« Les juifs ne reviendront pas » (15:20)Une politique publique de spoliation assumée et organisée par la préfecture (23:30)Écrire cette histoire sans désigner des « héros » ni des « collabos » (34:20)Des locataires juifs trahis par les autorités à la Libération (43:05) Le conseil de lecture :Robert Bober, Quoi de neuf sur la guerre ? (1993)Danièle Voldman, Locataires et propriétaires, Une histoire française (2016)Fabrice Langrognet, Voisins de passage (2024)Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Deux filles nues, la bande dessinée de Luz, dessinateur, échappe de justesse aux attentats de Charlie Hebdo.Publiée aux éditions Albin Michel, Deux filles nues retrace l'histoire du tableau éponyme peint en 1919 par Otto Mueller, spolié par les nazis à un collectionneur juif.À travers le parcours de cette œuvre, Luz aborde la montée du nazisme, les persécutions antisémites et la censure de l'art qualifié de « dégénéré ».

durée : 00:22:34 - L'invité de 8h20 : le grand entretien - par : Nicolas Demorand, Léa Salamé - Le président du Rassemblement national Jordan Bardella s'oppose à une "Europe de la défense" qui reposerait sur "la spoliation des moyens de la France". Concernant l'Ukraine, il estime que "2025 doit être l'année de la paix".

durée : 00:22:34 - L'invité de 8h20 : le grand entretien - par : Nicolas Demorand, Léa Salamé - Le président du Rassemblement national Jordan Bardella s'oppose à une "Europe de la défense" qui reposerait sur "la spoliation des moyens de la France". Concernant l'Ukraine, il estime que "2025 doit être l'année de la paix".

C'était il y a un an, jour pour jour. Le 18 décembre 2023, à minuit cinq, le plus grand dépôt de carburant de Guinée explosait sur la presqu'île de Kaloum, à Conakry. Plus de 20 morts et plusieurs milliers de sinistrés. À l'époque, une enquête judiciaire a été ouverte « pour incendie volontaire ». Un an après, où en sont les investigations ? Et que sont devenues les milliers de personnes dont les maisons ont été soufflées ? Mamoudou Cifo Kétouré est enseignant et préside sur place le Comité des sinistrés des hydrocarbures de Kaloum. En ligne de Conakry, il répond aux questions de Christophe Boisbouvier. RFI : Un an après, est-ce qu'on connaît les causes de la catastrophe ?Mamoudou Cifo Kétouré : Non, aucune idée. Parce que nous n'avons reçu aucun enquêteur. Nous ne connaissons pas les résultats de l'enquête, et pire, nous n'avons même pas reçu les condoléances d'usage.Alors, suite à la catastrophe, une enquête judiciaire a été ouverte, «pour des faits présumés d'incendie volontaire». Est-ce à dire que ce n'est pas un simple accident ?Oui, c'est le gouvernement qui a été le premier à alerter pour parler de présumé incendie criminel. Et c'est lui qui a les moyens de la police, des enquêteurs pour faire connaître la vérité dans cette affaire. Parce qu'il s'agit de dizaines d'âmes perdues et brûlées dans le feu, un feu qui les consumait pendant une semaine. Il s'agit du plus grave incendie de notre pays, de notre histoire. Cela ne peut pas passer inaperçu.Alors certains évoquent l'hypothèse de voleurs de carburant qui se seraient introduits sur le site, qui auraient manipulé un objet…Nous ne pouvons pas croire à cela.Et qui auraient provoqué l'explosion…Nous ne pouvons pas croire à cela, surtout qu'il y a eu une réelle volonté de spoliation de nos biens. Tout ce qu'on nous a dit dans cette affaire-là, « tenez, voici des sacs de riz, acceptez que vous soyez relogés à 50 kilomètres de Conakry, de Kaloum, vous allez quitter la capitale », c'est un plan de recasement que nous avons refusé. Nous disons non.Alors, à la suite de cette catastrophe, on se souvient, il y a eu des messages venus du monde entier, de l'ONU, de l'Union africaine, du pape, de l'Union européenne. Est-ce que, grâce à cette mobilisation, les sinistrés ont pu être secourus ?Nous saluons cette mobilisation internationale. Il y a un nombre important de ménages qui ont reçu des sacs de riz. Ça, ça a été un apport important pour nous. Mais nous avons voulu recevoir aussi les feuilles de tôles, les sacs de ciment qui ont été offerts par les mêmes personnes et ce sont les mêmes autorités qui les ont reçues. Jusqu'à ce jour, un an après, nous n'avons pas reçu une feuille de tôle, et un seul sac de ciment. Rien. Ces sacs de ciment, ces feuilles de tôles, ils ont totalement disparu. Pour aller où ? Mais pire, il y a une volonté de spoliation de nos biens, parce que les sommes d'argent qui ont été reçues comme don, en remettant ça aux locataires, on leur dit que c'est pour aller trouver des maisons ailleurs. Nous ne vendrons pas nos terrains ! Il s'agit de biens qui nous appartiennent et nous ne sommes pas sur un domaine de l'Etat.Alors, le 27 mai dernier, le Premier ministre Bah Oury a annoncé 860 000 € pour les sinistrés, avec notamment une enveloppe de 2 millions de francs guinéens pour chacun des 55 propriétaires et une enveloppe d'un million de francs guinéens pour chacun des 322 locataires. Est-ce que ce n'est tout de même pas un geste concret ?Nous savons qu'il y a eu quelques sommes qui ont été remises à quelques personnes. Mais je dis que la commission qui gère, elle gère dans une opacité sans pareille. Il n'y a pas de communication : qui a reçu ? Qui a donné ? L'argent vient de qui ? Mais pourquoi vous nous parlez toujours de libérer ces constructions pour que vous veniez faire quelques constructions ? Nous disons non. Il y a une volonté de spoliation de nos biens.C'est-à-dire que vous acceptez les indemnisations, mais vous n'acceptez pas de déménager et de quitter la Presqu'île de Kaloum pour aller en banlieue. C'est ça ?Nous acceptons l'indemnisation, ça on est d'accord, mais nous ne quitterons pas, parce que ce n'est pas un domaine de l'État, voilà.Parce que la Presqu'île de Kaloum, elle est au cœur du quartier de l'administration, qui abrite notamment la présidence et la plupart des ministères. Et vous soupçonnez certains de vouloir vous faire déménager en banlieue pour pouvoir récupérer vos terrains qui sont évidemment très convoités, c'est ça ?Mais cela se confirme aujourd'hui, parce qu'en lieu et place d'enquêtes, on nous parle toujours de recasement, de relogement. Alors, à partir de là, chacun peut tirer sa conclusion.Vous voulez reconstruire vos maisons ?Oui, nous-mêmes, par les apports qui sont venus, c'est-à-dire ces feuilles de tôle, ces ciments et les montants qui les ont accompagnés, vous devez nous les donner. Pourquoi nous tenons à ce point-là ? Parce que, si nous ne sommes pas indemnisés, s'il n'y a pas d'enquête, il y a risque de récidive. Vous savez, la Presqu'île de Kaloum, c'est quand même l'endroit le plus convoité du pays.Parce que c'est là que se trouve la présidence ?Mais c'est ici que les terrains coûtent le plus cher. Nous, nous sommes les autochtones d'ici. Voilà.Voulez-vous dire que l'objectif des gens qui ont fait exploser ce dépôt de carburant, c'était peut-être de vous chasser du quartier ?S'il n'y a pas d'enquête, chacun sera amené à tirer sa conclusion. Mais nous pouvons quand même avouer que nous n'avons pas été traités dignement. Ce qui amène à des interrogations quand même, à se demander le pourquoi de cette situation.Pensez-vous à des criminels qui voulaient détruire le quartier pour pouvoir ensuite récupérer le terrain ?Nous attendons les résultats de l'enquête.Mais vous pensez que c'est une hypothèse sérieuse ?Oui, à ne pas négliger. Surtout que c'est un l'État qui a communiqué en disant qu'il s'agissait d'un présumé incendie criminel. Tout ce que nous pouvons demander au gouvernement, c'est de faciliter l'enquête. Tant qu'il n'y aura pas de transparence, nous ne participerons pas à un débat, à une discussion sur le relogement sur nos maisons.

Richard Allen has asked, once again, to have his charges dismissed.  This time, his legal team is says that evidence was destroyed.      So, what would lead to the case being dismissed?A case against a defendant can be dismissed due to missing evidence for several reasons, all of which revolve around the concept of ensuring a fair trial and upholding the principles of justice. Here are the detailed reasons why this might happen:1.) Insufficient Evidence to Support ChargesFor a case to proceed to trial, the prosecution must present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, meaning there must be enough evidence for a reasonable jury to potentially find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If key pieces of evidence are missing, the prosecution may be unable to meet this burden. Without sufficient evidence, the judge may dismiss the case because there is not enough to justify continuing the prosecution.2. Violation of Due ProcessThe Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution guarantee due process rights, which include the right to a fair trial. If evidence that is crucial to the defense is lost, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable, this can constitute a violation of due process. The defense must be given a fair opportunity to challenge the prosecution's case, and missing evidence can impede this right, leading to dismissal.3. Brady ViolationA Brady violation occurs when the prosecution fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is any information that might be favorable to the defendant, either by casting doubt on the defendant's guilt or by mitigating the defendant's culpability. If evidence goes missing and it's shown that the prosecution did not disclose it, and this evidence could have affected the outcome of the trial, the case may be dismissed.4. Chain of Custody IssuesThe chain of custody refers to the documentation and proper handling of evidence from the time it is collected until it is presented in court. If evidence is lost or mishandled, the integrity of the evidence can be called into question. This might lead to the evidence being deemed inadmissible. Without critical pieces of evidence, the prosecution's case might be too weak to proceed, leading to dismissal.5. Destruction of Evidence (Spoliation)If evidence is destroyed either intentionally or negligently, it can compromise the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial. Spoliation of evidence refers to the destruction or alteration of evidence that is pertinent to the case. Courts take a very dim view of spoliation, and if it occurs, the judge may dismiss the case as a remedy, particularly if the missing evidence is central to the defendant's defense.6. Lack of CorroborationCertain types of evidence require corroboration to be admissible in court. For instance, some jurisdictions require corroborating evidence to support the testimony of accomplices or victims in specific crimes. If the corroborative evidence is missing, the primary evidence may not be sufficient on its own, leading to dismissal.7. Pretrial Motions by DefenseDefense attorneys can file pretrial motions to dismiss based on missing evidence. They might argue that the missing evidence is so critical that its absence prevents the defendant from receiving a fair trial. Judges will evaluate such motions carefully and may grant dismissal if they agree that the missing evidence is essential to the case.The dismissal of a case due to missing evidence reflects the judicial system's commitment to fairness and the protection of constitutional rights. The legal system requires that evidence be handled with integrity, disclosed properly, and preserved accurately to ensure both the prosecution and defense can present their cases fully and fairly. When evidence goes missing, it undermines these principles, often necessitating the dismissal of the case to uphold justice.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murder suspect Richard Allen seeks to dismiss case again (jconline.com)

Tous les soirs de 22h15 à 1h, les auditeurs se livrent à l'écoute bienveillante de Valérie Darmon, du lundi au jeudi, et de Sana Blanger du vendredi au dimanche. Venez partager leurs questionnements, leurs doutes, mais aussi leurs joies et leurs belles histoires. Un moment d'échange en toute liberté, sans jugement ni tabous. Si vous aussi vous souhaitez témoigner, laissez vos coordonnées en appelant Europe 1 au : 01 80 20 39 21. Numéro non surtaxé.

Tous les soirs de 22h15 à 1h, les auditeurs se livrent à l'écoute bienveillante de Valérie Darmon, du lundi au jeudi, et de Sana Blanger du vendredi au dimanche. Venez partager leurs questionnements, leurs doutes, mais aussi leurs joies et leurs belles histoires. Un moment d'échange en toute liberté, sans jugement ni tabous. Si vous aussi vous souhaitez témoigner, laissez vos coordonnées en appelant Europe 1 au : 01 80 20 39 21. Numéro non surtaxé.

Au cœur de la nuit, les auditeurs se livrent en toute liberté aux oreilles attentives et bienveillantes de Valérie Darmon. Pas de jugements ni de tabous, une conversation franche, mais aussi des réponses aux questions que les auditeurs se posent. Un moment d'échange et de partage propice à la confidence pour repartir le cœur plus léger.

Avec son livre Le cinéma était leur pays, Serge Siritzky raconte l'histoire réelle de sa famille juive, les Siritzky, qui, trois fois de suite, pour sauver leur vie, ont dû fuir le pays dans lequel ils étaient établis pour se réfugier dans un pays dont ils ne parlaient même pas la langue.C'est la saga méconnue de cette famille d'exploitants de cinéma spoliés sous Vichy

We update you on the developments at Alex Jones's two bankruptcy hearings last week and why they were a big win for the conspiracy theorist, with a special deep dive into Article I vs. Article III judges. Then, we discuss the latest from the Supreme court, before turning our attention to the myriad ways in which Donald Trump's lawyers are still takin' a dive before Aileen Cannon in the Southern District of Florida, just hoping that she'll throw that red card.   Links: 27 CFR Parts 447, 478, and 479 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-26/pdf/2018-27763.pdf Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17768408304219861886 Alex Jones personal bankruptcy docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66583024/alexander-e-jones/ FSS bankruptcy docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64868456/free-speech-systems-llc/ US v. Trump (SDNY Docket - Judge Cannon) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490071/united-states-v-trump/ US v. Trump, MTD for Surplusage https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/trump-motion-indictment-dismiss.pdf  US v. Trump, Order on MTD for Surplusage https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.608.0_1.pdf  US v. Trump, MTD for Spoliation https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.612.0_1.pdf    Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod

Judge Cannon struck a paragraph from Trump's indictment and denied denied Trump's motion to dismiss on insufficient pleading grounds. She may have made a significant legal error in one of her rulings. Trump filed a new motion to dismiss claiming spoliation of evidence.All this and more!Plus, a listener questions and more. Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to know:Rule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

durée : 00:04:00 - Le Pourquoi du comment : histoire - par : Gérard Noiriel - Pendant la Révolution française, la spoliation des œuvres d'art a été justifiée par l'idée que la France révolutionnaire était l'héritière légitime de la culture grecque. Seuls les peuples libres pouvaient apprécier et posséder ces œuvres. Comment interpréter ce "rapatriement" des œuvres ?

Ahead of Tuesday's closing arguments in the first ever criminal trial of a former president, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord detail Tuesday's crushing cross examination of Robert Costello by Susan Hoffinger, and what it means for the defense's attempt to undermine Michael Cohen's credibility. Then, what listeners should infer from the charging conference- as this determines what the jury can deliberate on. And big picture: what each side needs to accomplish in their respective closing arguments.

Richard Allen has asked, once again, to have his charges dismissed.  This time, his legal team is says that evidence was destroyed.      So, what would lead to a dismissal? A case against a defendant can be dismissed due to missing evidence for several reasons, all of which revolve around the concept of ensuring a fair trial and upholding the principles of justice. Here are the detailed reasons why this might happen:Insufficient Evidence to Support ChargesFor a case to proceed to trial, the prosecution must present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, meaning there must be enough evidence for a reasonable jury to potentially find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If key pieces of evidence are missing, the prosecution may be unable to meet this burden. Without sufficient evidence, the judge may dismiss the case because there is not enough to justify continuing the prosecution.2. Violation of Due ProcessThe Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution guarantee due process rights, which include the right to a fair trial. If evidence that is crucial to the defense is lost, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable, this can constitute a violation of due process. The defense must be given a fair opportunity to challenge the prosecution's case, and missing evidence can impede this right, leading to dismissal.3. Brady ViolationA Brady violation occurs when the prosecution fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is any information that might be favorable to the defendant, either by casting doubt on the defendant's guilt or by mitigating the defendant's culpability. If evidence goes missing and it's shown that the prosecution did not disclose it, and this evidence could have affected the outcome of the trial, the case may be dismissed.4. Chain of Custody IssuesThe chain of custody refers to the documentation and proper handling of evidence from the time it is collected until it is presented in court. If evidence is lost or mishandled, the integrity of the evidence can be called into question. This might lead to the evidence being deemed inadmissible. Without critical pieces of evidence, the prosecution's case might be too weak to proceed, leading to dismissal.5. Destruction of Evidence (Spoliation)If evidence is destroyed either intentionally or negligently, it can compromise the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial. Spoliation of evidence refers to the destruction or alteration of evidence that is pertinent to the case. Courts take a very dim view of spoliation, and if it occurs, the judge may dismiss the case as a remedy, particularly if the missing evidence is central to the defendant's defense.6. Lack of CorroborationCertain types of evidence require corroboration to be admissible in court. For instance, some jurisdictions require corroborating evidence to support the testimony of accomplices or victims in specific crimes. If the corroborative evidence is missing, the primary evidence may not be sufficient on its own, leading to dismissal.7. Pretrial Motions by DefenseDefense attorneys can file pretrial motions to dismiss based on missing evidence. They might argue that the missing evidence is so critical that its absence prevents the defendant from receiving a fair trial. Judges will evaluate such motions carefully and may grant dismissal if they agree that the missing evidence is essential to the case.The dismissal of a case due to missing evidence reflects the judicial system's commitment to fairness and the protection of constitutional rights. The legal system requires that evidence be handled with integrity, disclosed properly, and preserved accurately to ensure both the prosecution and defense can present their cases fully and fairly. When evidence goes missing, it undermines these principles, often necessitating the dismissal of the case to uphold justice.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murder suspect Richard Allen seeks to dismiss case again (jconline.com)

Richard Allen has asked, once again, to have his charges dismissed.  This time, his legal team is says that evidence was destroyed.      So, what would lead to a dismissal? A case against a defendant can be dismissed due to missing evidence for several reasons, all of which revolve around the concept of ensuring a fair trial and upholding the principles of justice. Here are the detailed reasons why this might happen:Insufficient Evidence to Support ChargesFor a case to proceed to trial, the prosecution must present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, meaning there must be enough evidence for a reasonable jury to potentially find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If key pieces of evidence are missing, the prosecution may be unable to meet this burden. Without sufficient evidence, the judge may dismiss the case because there is not enough to justify continuing the prosecution.2. Violation of Due ProcessThe Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution guarantee due process rights, which include the right to a fair trial. If evidence that is crucial to the defense is lost, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable, this can constitute a violation of due process. The defense must be given a fair opportunity to challenge the prosecution's case, and missing evidence can impede this right, leading to dismissal.3. Brady ViolationA Brady violation occurs when the prosecution fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is any information that might be favorable to the defendant, either by casting doubt on the defendant's guilt or by mitigating the defendant's culpability. If evidence goes missing and it's shown that the prosecution did not disclose it, and this evidence could have affected the outcome of the trial, the case may be dismissed.4. Chain of Custody IssuesThe chain of custody refers to the documentation and proper handling of evidence from the time it is collected until it is presented in court. If evidence is lost or mishandled, the integrity of the evidence can be called into question. This might lead to the evidence being deemed inadmissible. Without critical pieces of evidence, the prosecution's case might be too weak to proceed, leading to dismissal.5. Destruction of Evidence (Spoliation)If evidence is destroyed either intentionally or negligently, it can compromise the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial. Spoliation of evidence refers to the destruction or alteration of evidence that is pertinent to the case. Courts take a very dim view of spoliation, and if it occurs, the judge may dismiss the case as a remedy, particularly if the missing evidence is central to the defendant's defense.6. Lack of CorroborationCertain types of evidence require corroboration to be admissible in court. For instance, some jurisdictions require corroborating evidence to support the testimony of accomplices or victims in specific crimes. If the corroborative evidence is missing, the primary evidence may not be sufficient on its own, leading to dismissal.7. Pretrial Motions by DefenseDefense attorneys can file pretrial motions to dismiss based on missing evidence. They might argue that the missing evidence is so critical that its absence prevents the defendant from receiving a fair trial. Judges will evaluate such motions carefully and may grant dismissal if they agree that the missing evidence is essential to the case.The dismissal of a case due to missing evidence reflects the judicial system's commitment to fairness and the protection of constitutional rights. The legal system requires that evidence be handled with integrity, disclosed properly, and preserved accurately to ensure both the prosecution and defense can present their cases fully and fairly. When evidence goes missing, it undermines these principles, often necessitating the dismissal of the case to uphold justice.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murder suspect Richard Allen seeks to dismiss case again (jconline.com)

Richard Allen has asked, once again, to have his charges dismissed.  This time, his legal team is says that evidence was destroyed.      So, what would lead to a dismissal? A case against a defendant can be dismissed due to missing evidence for several reasons, all of which revolve around the concept of ensuring a fair trial and upholding the principles of justice. Here are the detailed reasons why this might happen:Insufficient Evidence to Support ChargesFor a case to proceed to trial, the prosecution must present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, meaning there must be enough evidence for a reasonable jury to potentially find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If key pieces of evidence are missing, the prosecution may be unable to meet this burden. Without sufficient evidence, the judge may dismiss the case because there is not enough to justify continuing the prosecution.2. Violation of Due ProcessThe Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution guarantee due process rights, which include the right to a fair trial. If evidence that is crucial to the defense is lost, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable, this can constitute a violation of due process. The defense must be given a fair opportunity to challenge the prosecution's case, and missing evidence can impede this right, leading to dismissal.3. Brady ViolationA Brady violation occurs when the prosecution fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is any information that might be favorable to the defendant, either by casting doubt on the defendant's guilt or by mitigating the defendant's culpability. If evidence goes missing and it's shown that the prosecution did not disclose it, and this evidence could have affected the outcome of the trial, the case may be dismissed.4. Chain of Custody IssuesThe chain of custody refers to the documentation and proper handling of evidence from the time it is collected until it is presented in court. If evidence is lost or mishandled, the integrity of the evidence can be called into question. This might lead to the evidence being deemed inadmissible. Without critical pieces of evidence, the prosecution's case might be too weak to proceed, leading to dismissal.5. Destruction of Evidence (Spoliation)If evidence is destroyed either intentionally or negligently, it can compromise the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial. Spoliation of evidence refers to the destruction or alteration of evidence that is pertinent to the case. Courts take a very dim view of spoliation, and if it occurs, the judge may dismiss the case as a remedy, particularly if the missing evidence is central to the defendant's defense.6. Lack of CorroborationCertain types of evidence require corroboration to be admissible in court. For instance, some jurisdictions require corroborating evidence to support the testimony of accomplices or victims in specific crimes. If the corroborative evidence is missing, the primary evidence may not be sufficient on its own, leading to dismissal.7. Pretrial Motions by DefenseDefense attorneys can file pretrial motions to dismiss based on missing evidence. They might argue that the missing evidence is so critical that its absence prevents the defendant from receiving a fair trial. Judges will evaluate such motions carefully and may grant dismissal if they agree that the missing evidence is essential to the case.The dismissal of a case due to missing evidence reflects the judicial system's commitment to fairness and the protection of constitutional rights. The legal system requires that evidence be handled with integrity, disclosed properly, and preserved accurately to ensure both the prosecution and defense can present their cases fully and fairly. When evidence goes missing, it undermines these principles, often necessitating the dismissal of the case to uphold justice.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murder suspect Richard Allen seeks to dismiss case again (jconline.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Avec son nouveau film Le tableau volé Pascal Bonitzer, le réalisateur du Grand Alibi et de Cherchez Hortense, nous ouvre les portes du monde très fermé du marché de l'art.Et si l'occupation nazie et la spoliations des biens juifs constituent l'arrière-plan historique sur lequel le scénario s'appuie, le film est l'occasion de se plonger dans le monde de l'argent et des salles des ventes.

La restitution des oeuvres spoliées par la Belgique au congo lors de la période coloniale sera l'une des tâches du prochain gouvernement. Une loi, votée en 2022, encadre ce processus qui sera long, et mené par des experts congolais et belges. Merci pour votre écoute Transversales, c'est également en direct tous les samedis de 12h à 13h00 sur www.rtbf.be/lapremiere Retrouvez tous les épisodes de Transversales sur notre plateforme Auvio.be : https://auvio.rtbf.be/emission/492 Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

INTERVIEW - La ministre de la Culture, Rima Abdul Malak, en a fait une de ses priorités pour l'année 2023 : rendre les œuvres spoliées par l'Allemagne nazie et le gouvernement de Vichy, entre 1933 et 1945. Mercredi 19 avril 2023, la ministre a présenté le projet de loi-cadre visant à faciliter la restitution de ces biens culturels, spoliés aux Juifs par les Nazis. Pour en parler, Virginie Girod reçoit Emmanuelle Polack, docteure en histoire de l'art et chargée de mission au musée de Louvre. “La spoliation est le fait de dépouiller légalement une population de ses biens. Elle laisse de nombreuses archives”. Terme à ne pas confondre avec le pillage, qui “contrevient aux lois internationales de la guerre. Il est sauvage”, explique Emmanuelle Polack. Le travail de documentation et d'inventaire des œuvres spoliées a été réalisé, durant la guerre, par la résistante Rose Valland : “Elle a un rôle d'espionne, et je dois vous le dire, nous travaillons encore et toujours sur les archives qu'elle a produites”, précise l'historienne. Sur environ 100 000 œuvres spoliées, 60 000 ont été retrouvées. Si 45 000 d'entre elles ont été remises à leurs propriétaires, toutes n'ont pas encore été récupérées. Restituer une œuvre est un moment “de grande émotion”, selon Emmanuelle Polack : “On ne rend pas simplement l'objet, on restitue la mémoire, le souvenir, et par ce geste, on reconnait les exactions dont les familles ont été victimes”.Sujets abordés : Allemagne nazie - Art - Seconde Guerre mondiale - Œuvres - Spoliation   "Au cœur de l'histoire" est un podcast Europe 1 Studio. Ecriture et présentation : Virginie Girod - Production : Europe 1 Studio- Direction artistique : Adèle Humbert et Julien Tharaud - Réalisation : Clément Ibrahim - Musique originale : Julien Tharaud - Musiques additionnelles : Julien Tharaud et Sébastien Guidis - Communication : Kelly Decroix - Visuel : Sidonie Mangin

This week I cover Windows events commonly associated with data spoliation and insider threats.

This week, join us as we revisit our episode on Spoliation for a refresher! Original Air Date: June 4, 2019. Spoliation is, at its core, evidence tampering.  No, we're not dealing with shady backroom threats on a witness' life, but the results of the destruction of evidence can be nonetheless devastating to a party's case, even when it happens by accident.  Join Steve and Rebecca as they discuss spoliation, why you shouldn't commit it, how to avoid negligent spoliation, and the myriad and sometimes harsh penalties handed down by courts when spoliation does occur.

Can Mormonism stand up to legal criticism when it comes to their truth claims? In this short bonus episode, Kolby—an ex-Mormon lawyer— explains why certain things can't just be explained away by Mormon apologists and how definitions of words are bent when it suits them. Let's see how they might hold up if Mormonism was on trial! Click here to watch on YouTube!Make sure to check out the rest of Kolby's story here(clickable chapter markers available on YouTube)Why Apply Legal Principals to God? Separating the Institution from local Church MembersLet's talk Spoliation and Joseph SmithWhy Mormonism is on TrialThe Burden of ProofThe Standard of ProofAn Apologist Approach with No EvidenceWho Can Actually be Called a Witness (to the plates)?Can you "Bear Testimony" without proof?Linda, Listen... scratch TribalismMormonismOnTrial.comhttps://www.mormonismontrial.com/JS Letter to Whitney family: https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/letter-to-newel-k-elizabeth-ann-smith-and-sarah-ann-whitney-18-august-1842/1Support ShelisePatreon: Patreon.com/cultstoconsciousnessVenmo @sheliseannAny donations are welcome and appreciated to support the making of this podcastFind Shelise on Social media!Instagram @cultstoconsciousnessHost Instagram @sheliseannTikTok @cults.to.consciousnessTwitter @cultstoconTheme Song Produced and Composed by Christian Guevara**Disclaimer: Thanks for joining us at Cults to Consciousness. This storytelling podcast is meant to be for entertainment purposes only and does not substitute for medical advice. We may discuss triggering topics and we ask that you make your personal mental health a priority. Lastly, the opinions of our guests do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the host.**

durée : 00:54:34 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda - En 2007, "La Fabrique de l'histoire" propose d'évoquer la période communiste sur le thème "L'Est, l'église, et l'utilisation de la mémoire" et un retour sur les pillages des Nazis, avec une archive de Rose Valland qui raconte le périple des œuvres d'art volées durant la Seconde guerre mondiale. - invités : Rose Valland Conservatrice de musée et résistante française; Muriel Blaive; Sophie Coeuré Professeur d'histoire contemporaine à l'Université Paris Diderot Paris 7

Inside the Court of the Northern Isles, the Gals pull every trick they can to turn a bad situation around. Don't forget to tweet using #drimbus to be entered for a chance to win a Dungeons & Drimbus sticker! Support Us Support Us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drimbus Visit Our Website: https://www.drimbus.com Sign up for The (Not-So) Daily Drimbus: https://www.drimbus.com/newsletter Buy us a Coffee: https://ko-fi.com/whimsic Buy our Merch: https://www.drimbus.com/merch Find and support our sponsors at: https://fableandfolly.com/partners Cast Amanda Fernandez-Acosta (Barbara) Michael Pisani (Jessica Feltcher) Giancarlo Herrera (DM)(Editing/Sound Design) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Think fast! The Gals take action as they find themselves in a tough spot when infiltration goes awry Don't forget to tweet using #drimbus to be entered for a chance to win a Dungeons & Drimbus sticker! Support Us Support Us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drimbus Visit Our Website: https://www.drimbus.com Sign up for The (Not-So) Daily Drimbus: https://www.drimbus.com/newsletter Buy us a Coffee: https://ko-fi.com/whimsic Buy our Merch: https://www.drimbus.com/merch Find and support our sponsors at: https://fableandfolly.com/partners Cast Amanda Fernandez-Acosta (Barbara) Michael Pisani (Jessica Feltcher) Giancarlo Herrera (DM)(Editing/Sound Design) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

With most of the witnesses lined up, the Gals decide it's time to do some tampering Don't forget to tweet using #drimbus to be entered for a chance to win a Dungeons & Drimbus sticker! Support Us Support Us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drimbus Visit Our Website: https://www.drimbus.com Sign up for The (Not-So) Daily Drimbus: https://www.drimbus.com/newsletter Buy us a Coffee: https://ko-fi.com/whimsic Buy our Merch: https://www.drimbus.com/merch Use code "Drimbus" at https://www.manscaped.com to get 20% off your order! Find and support our sponsors at: https://fableandfolly.com/partners Cast Amanda Fernandez-Acosta (Barbara) Michael Pisani (Jessica Feltcher) Giancarlo Herrera (DM)(Editing/Sound Design) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this Hacks & Wonks week-in-review, Crystal is joined by the former Director of Progressive Majority who has now transitioned into public service but remains involved in numerous political efforts across Washington, EJ Juárez.  This week, Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell announced his proposed budget for 2023-2024, and there are a number of questionable decisions that reveal where the mayor's priorities lie. Beyond moving parking enforcement back to the SPD, the budget invests in a police surveillance tool called ShotSpotter, which has been a failure in other cities where it's been implemented, resulting in lead to police overreach without a reduction in crime.  At the same time, Harrell's budget is calling to lower the cost-of-living increases for the city's human services workers, a choice that would require a change in law. At a time when inflation is hurting everyone, especially our lowest earners, and we're dealing with a number of public health crises and staffing shortages, the decision to effectively cut the pay of essential workers who are doing crucial work stands in stark contrast to the large hiring bonuses being offered to police.   King County Executive Dow Constantine and other leaders announced a new property tax that would provide $1.25B to help create new behavioral health crisis centers to help those in need receive necessary support. This proposal will need to be approved by the King County Council before being voted on in an April special election. We'll keep checking in on this plan as it develops. In a new update on the controversy surrounding former mayor Jenny Durkan's missing text messages, a forensic analysis has found evidence that these messages were intentionally deleted, not accidentally removed. As EJ reminds us, these public records concern an issue that resulted in someone's death, and their deletion has prevented their family from getting closure. If it's determined that these messages were in fact intentionally deleted, the implications are criminal. We'll keep paying attention to this story for updates. In the 42nd LD in Whatcom County, a State House race has seen a terrible, but not so shocking, revelation. GOP candidate Don Johnson attempted to scrub his social media feeds of racist, misogynist, and anti-semitic posts, but failed to do so before the Bellingham Herald recorded them. The Herald reported on the unacceptable posts this week, revealing a history of dangerous rhetoric and misinformation that Johnson hopped to hide. Another reminder that Crystal will be hosting a debate between 37th LD State Rep candidates Emijah Smith and Chipalo Street on Tuesday, October 4th at 7:00pm at the Rainier Art Center and streamed live. See seattleemerald.com/debate for more details! As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com. Find the host, Crystal Fincher on Twitter at@finchfrii and find today's co-host, EJ Juárez, at @EliseoJJuarez. More info is available at officialhacksandwonks.com.   Resources “Harrell's Budget Would Move Parking Encforcement Back to SPD, Add $10 Million to Homelessness Authority, and Use JumpStart to Backfill Budget" by Erica C. Barentt (@ericacbarnett) from Publicola (@PubliColaNews): https://publicola.com/2022/09/27/harrells-budget-would-move-parking-enforcement-back-to-spd-add-10-million-to-homelessness-authority-and-use-jumpstart-to-backfill-budget/   “Harrell budget proposal steps back on Seattle reforms including larger SPD, new plan for big business tax” by jseattle from Capitol Hill Seattle Blog: https://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2022/09/harrell-budget-proposal-steps-back-on-seattle-reforms-including-larger-spd-new-plan-for-big-business-tax/   "City of Seattle and King County Reveal Proposed Budgets for Input" by Vee Hua from The South Seattle Emerald (@SoSeaEmerald): https://southseattleemerald.com/2022/09/28/news-gleams-city-of-seattle-and-king-county-reveal-proposed-budgets-for-input-renton-arts-grants/   “The Mayor Wants to Pay Human Service Providers Less” by Hannah Krieg (@hannahkrieg) from The Stranger(@TheStranger): https://www.thestranger.com/news/2022/09/28/78543620/the-mayor-wants-to-pay-human-service-providers-less   Information on public comments for the budget from The South Seattle Emerald: Written public comment on the city's 2023-2024 budget will be accepted at all meetings of the City Council's Budget Committee. Comments intended for the full council can be sent to council@seattle.gov. There will be three public hearings on the budget at City Hall on these dates: Tuesday, Oct. 11, at 5 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 8, at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday, Nov. 15, at 5 p.m.   "Seattle's Left Proposes Defunding the Police, Stopping Sweeps, and Building Housing in Solidarity Budget" by Hannah Krieg (@hannahkrieg) from The Stranger(@TheStranger): https://www.thestranger.com/news/2022/09/23/78520829/seattles-left-proposes-defunding-the-police-stopping-sweeps-and-building-housing-in-solidarity-budget   “New Tax Would  Fund Behavioral Crisis Centers” by Erica C. Barentt (@ericacbarnett) from Publicola (@PubliColaNews): https://publicola.com/2022/09/27/new-tax-would-fund-behavioral-crisis-centers-things-to-look-for-in-harrells-first-budget-proposal/   "‘Spoliation of Evidence' - CHOP lawsuit judge asked to rule against City of Seattle over deleted texts” by jseattle from Capital Hill Seattle Blog- https://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2022/09/spoliation-of-evidence-chop-lawsuit-judge-asked-to-rule-against-city-of-seattle-over-deleted-texts/    The Bellingham Herald(@BhamHerald)'s story on Dan Johnson's hateful social media history [story is behind a paywall]: https://t.co/Xtbq2D6BKD    Tweet thread with information about Whatcom County State House Candidate Dan Johnson's hateful online history: https://twitter.com/finchfrii/status/1574794894807539712?s=20&t=Kn1jkKibpz1cn_fNJUBMzg   Next Tuesday, October 4th, at 7:00pm, join Crystal live or in-person as she hosts a debate between 37th LD State Rep candidates Emijah Smith & Chipalo Street! See seattleemerald.com/debate for more details!   Transcrip Coming Soon

Guest: Prof Elmien Du Plessis | Associate Professor of Law at North West UniversitySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week we continue with the Windows fast triage series and talk about data spoliation detection.

durée : 00:20:23 - Journal de 18h - Limiter la hausse des factures d'énergie ne doit pas entraîner le saccage d'EDF et du service public : c'est le message que veulent faire passer les salariés d'EDF mobilisés contre les mesures gouvernementales.

Partner Matthew Ferrie, Counsel Gus Sara and Counsel Lian Skaf are together again to discuss and debate three different spoliation hypotheticals.

Gold was only included in the plans for the Bretton Woods system because of the veneer of solidity it gave. Original Article: "Bretton Woods and the Spoliation of Europe" This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon. Narrated by Michael Stack.

Gold was only included in the plans for the Bretton Woods system because of the veneer of solidity it gave. Original Article: "Bretton Woods and the Spoliation of Europe" This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon. Narrated by Michael Stack.

Below is the email for Dr. Jacques Schuhmacher: j.schuhmacher@vam.ac.ukThe following is a link for more information on the Victoria & Albert Museum's Concealed Histories Exhibit.SHOW NOTES 3:30 importance of provenance research regarding potential for Nazi-looted art in collections outside of countries that had been occupied by the Nazis 7:35 provenance gaps in Gilbert Collection didn't raise concerns when the Gilberts were acquiring the collection;  9:40 Nazi-looted art found in U.S. collections in the 1990s, making this an issue for the international art market  10:55 Unclear provenance of snuffbox from Gutmann Collection  15:50 massive red flags raised by some objects like the Louis XVI enameled gold snuffbox looted from Maximilian von Goldschmidt-Rothschild18:30 Decisions about restitution of looted art are not made by UK museums but by a panel of experts19:45 The only restitution to date by the V&A has been of Meissen pieces.22:05 even after Monuments Men joined the museum, an unbroken chain in provenance was not necessary; acquisition protocol in the U.K. didn't change until 199823:40 Deaccession laws in the UK under the Heritage Act were changed with the U.K.'s Holocaust Act 2009 35:30 no claims for works in the Gilbert Collection37:35 Victoria & Albert Musuem's Concealed Histories. 38:38 Magdala1868 exhibition of Ethiopian cultural objects inspired V&A'sConcealed Histories.41:35 MacKenzie Mallon with the Nelson-Atkins Museum had put on the Discriminating Thieves exhibition, which was a huge inspiration for V&A's Concealed Histories.  42:50 Provenance research into Nazi-looted art detached from other types of provenance research 44:45 Ethiopian Embassy negotiations for return of objects looted during Colonial era 45:00 Long-term loans used to return work that is subject to deaccession laws; example being long term loan of silver item stolen during church festival in Spain46:45 In 1999, discovered that V&A had bought in 1950s a silver item without realizing it was stolen in the 1890s in Spain; object has been on long-term loan since 200548:25 Gilbert collection is on 100+ years long term loan50:00 Museum Association guidelines for restitution claims being updated 51:15 Virtual loans52:49 Notion of digital restitution 54:30 upcoming provenance research handbook for researchers in English-speaking countries 57:30  idea of a mega-website arose from the 1998 Washington Conference to allow cross-referencing to identify objects58:35 no replacement for archival research1:01:50 His provenance research at the V&A outside of the Gilbert Collection includes newly acquired objects, loaned objects and objects for which questions are raised1:05:15 He studied history and did PhD in German/Allied war crimes then worked at London's Commission for Looted Art1:07:50 Student inquiries about provenance research welcome To view rewards for supporting the podcast, please visit Warfare's Patreon page.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast, please call 1.929.260.4942 or email Stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. © Stephanie Drawdy [2021]

Atlanta personal injury trial lawyer, Theodore Spaulding, defines spoliation of evidence letters and explains how they fit into a truck accident lawsuit.

Au cœur de la nuit, les auditeurs se livrent en toute liberté aux oreilles attentives et bienveillantes d'Olivier Delacroix du lundi au jeudi et de Sabine Marin du vendredi au dimanche. Pas de jugements ni de tabous, une conversation franche mais aussi des réponses aux questions que les auditeurs se posent. Un moment d'échange et de partage propice à la confidence pour repartir le cœur plus léger.

durée : 00:51:57 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit, Maïwenn Guiziou - Dès l'été 1940, l’occupant allemand, avec la collaboration du gouvernement du maréchal Pétain, organise le pillage du patrimoine artistique détenu par les Juifs. Aujourd'hui, après des enquêtes fastidieuses, quelques-unes de ces œuvres retrouvent les familles de leur propriétaire d'origine. - réalisation : Milena Aellig, Eric Lancien, Somaya Dabbech - invités : Emmanuelle Polack Historienne de l'art; Valérie Hannin Directrice de la rédaction du magazine L'Histoire.

Chaque soir, Olivier Delacroix vous ouvre la Libre antenne. Pas de jugements ni de tabous, une conversation franche mais aussi des réponses aux questions que les auditeurs se posent. Un moment d'échange et de partage propice à la confidence pour repartir le cœur plus léger.

Advocate Hector van Heerden explains interesting insights about contract law. Support this podcast

durée : 00:56:06 - Grand Reportage - par : Aurélie Kieffer - Des milliers de Juifs ont été spoliés de leurs biens sous l'Occupation. Parmi ces biens, de nombreuses œuvres d'art qui ont parfois intégré des musées par la suite. Aujourd'hui, de nombreuses familles demandent leur restitution. Une procédure longue et dont le succès est incertain. - réalisation : Annie Brault - invités : Michel Jeannoutot Président de la commission d'indemnisation des victimes de spoliation (CIVS)

In today's episode I introduced my Fifth FRIENDS spoil podcasting and today I'd like to try a new thing that I'd like to call the “ Workout Session.” It's when you workout and doing stuff together so comment if you want me to do more of it! Now enjoy the Podcast!!! Email: tawan.sap1@gmail.com

Local author James Rollins joins host Brad Young to discuss his latest book “The Last Odyssey” and some of his other scientific thriller novels. Young also discusses George Soros’ backing of Kim Gardner and the St. Louis Crime Lab’s altering of the McCloskey’s inoperable pistol.

durée : 00:07:06 - L'invité de 6h20 - par : Mathilde MUNOS - Me Cédric Fischer, avocat de la famille Bauer qui vient de récupérer le tableau “La Cueillette” de Pissarro, est l'invité de Mathilde Munos.

In this episode, Attorney Rosensweig discusses the fact that the civil lawsuit and criminal charges against Kevin Spacey were dropped after an 18-year-old boy claimed he was sexually assaulted by Spacey.  Does this mean Spacey is innocent?  What happened to the young man's missing cell phone?  In general, when a case like this is dropped, can we safely assume the accused is innocent?  Ms. Rosensweig explores all of this and more in this important episode. 

Spoliation is, at it’s core, evidence tampering.  No, we’re not dealing with shady backroom threats on a witness’ life, but the results of the destruction of evidence can be nonetheless devastating to a party’s case, even when it happens by accident.  Join Steve and Rebecca as they discuss spoliation, why you shouldn’t commit it, how to avoid negligent spoliation, and the myriad and sometimes harsh penalties handed down by courts when spoliation does occur. The post Spoliation appeared first on Rathbone Group, LLC.

On this weeks episode and continuing our tour of different state's Distilleries, the lawyers sample Wyoming Whiskey's Outryder. Here are the notes from the distiller's website: OUTRYDER A straight American whiskey with higher rye content than our Small Batch Bourbon, but short of a true rye whiskey.  Different and great.  Perfect for sipping or making cocktails. It’s crafted from two distinct mash bills distilled in November of 2011.  The first mash bill contains 48% winter rye, 40% corn, and 12% malted barley and the second reflects a traditional bourbon mash bill of 68% corn, 20% winter rye, and 12% malted barley.  In keeping with Wyoming Whiskey’s tradition, these grains are all non-GMO and grown in Byron, Wyoming by Rageth Farms. 100 PROOF.  BOTTLED IN BOND. TASTING NOTES COLOR: amber to light copper NOSE: brown baking spices of cinnamon and allspice with creamy browned butter PALATE: clove and allspice, freshly baked dark rye bread with hints of orange blossom honey MOUTHFEEL: cinnamon spice with creamy butterscotch pudding FINISH: long, spicy rye finish coupled with hints of buttery toffee We have a number of fun topics including: Tiger Woods' restaurant is in hot water for destruction of video evidence in a wrongful death lawsuit.  Why preservation of evidence matters and how, as attorneys, we can attack when the other side mishandles or destroys evidence. I Can’t Believe It’s Not Baltimore: Follow up to Homeless Vet GoFundMe Scam 4th Circuit Immigration case - DACA update and why it's important. Canadian "businessmen" carjacked while in Park Heights neighborhood of Baltimore.  The lawyers aren't buying this story at face value. Lawyers on the Rocks features Jeremy Eldridge, Kurt Nachtman and Adam Crandell. This triumvirate of lawyers will give you their unsolicited opinion on everything legal and illegal, while enjoying a handcrafted cocktail. Lawyers on the Rocks is sponsored by the Law Office of Eldridge, Nachtman & Crandell, LLC and produced by Up Next Creative, LLC.  

Afin d'améliorer la recherche sur la spoliation patrimoniale, les Archives nationales ont mis en ligne des outils d'orientation des lecteurs. Ces derniers ont notamment été utiles à la redécouverte des archives du Commissariat générale aux questions juives et du service de restitution des biens des victimes des lois et des mesures de spoliations. Parmi les systèmes d'aide à la recherche, on trouve, entre autres la salle des inventaires virtuelle et la base de données ARYA. Intervention d'Isabelle Chave, conservateur en chef du patrimoine, responsable du département de l'Exécutif et du Législatif, direction des fonds des Archives nationales, enregistrée le 22 janvier 2015 dans le cadre du colloque « Patrimoines spoliés. Etat des lieux et instruments de recherche».

Le cas de l'Allemagne: l'exemple de la spoliation des biens culturels dans la Moselle annexée au IIIe Reich. Lorsqu'en 1940 la Moselle est annexée par le Reich, les « indésirables » sont expulsés et forcés à laisser une grande partie de leurs biens derrière eux. Aussitôt, un organisme est mis en place afin d'organiser la spoliation des biens de ces « ennemis du peuple et du Reich ». Intervention Jean-Pierre Legendre, conservateur en chef du patrimoine, service régional de l'archéologie, DRAC Rhône-Alpes, enregistrée le 22 janvier 2015 dans le cadre du colloque « Patrimoines spoliés. Etat des lieux et instruments de recherche».

Attorney George Hall with the law firm of Hull Barrett, PC in Augusta, Georgia defines a spoliation claim, how to avoid them and how an insurance carrier is potentially impacted. Special thanks to our sponsor, A.M. Best Company, Best’s Directories of Recommended Attorneys & Adjuster, including Expert Service Providers.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. agreed to a $2.4 billion settlement to resolve bladder cancer claims tied to its Type 2 diabetes drug Actos. On past Ringler Radio shows, we have followed the litigation surrounding Actos.  On Ringler Radio, host Larry Cohen and co-host, Keith Christie join guest Attorney Frank Woodson, from the Beasley Allen Law Firm,  to discuss this billion dollar settlement, negotiating a settlement and the impact on future pharmaceutical litigation.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. agreed to a $2.4 billion settlement to resolve bladder cancer claims tied to its Type 2 diabetes drug Actos. On past Ringler Radio shows, we have followed the litigation surrounding Actos.  On Ringler Radio, host Larry Cohen and co-host, Keith Christie join guest Attorney Frank Woodson, from the Beasley Allen Law Firm,  to discuss this billion dollar settlement, negotiating a settlement and the impact on future pharmaceutical litigation.

This episode of Breaking Goodman covers Season 1 Episode 8 of Better Call Saul entitled “RICO”. In an effort to be more informative as we head into the final episodes of the podcast I’ll say that RICO in this case referring to the Racketeer and Corrupt Organizations Act. Also, Spoliation which Read more…

In 2006, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule-makers developed and put into practice amendments dealing with electronically stored information (ESI) and e-discovery. However, most of those involved believed these amendments did not adequately deal with lost or missing ESI or "the spoliation issue." In 2014 the rule-makers proposed Rule 37(e), which deals with the issue of spoliation equally across all federal courts, resolving the issue of inherent authority, or judges making decisions individually for each case. What are these changes and how will they affect the way businesses deal with e-discovery and data preservation? In this episode of The Digital Detectives, Sharon Nelson and John Simek interview ESI preservation expert James Kurz about how Rule 37(e) works and what the consequences are for the future of ESI preservation. Kurz explains that the rule, which only deals with ESI, proposes a three part test before considering spoliation issues: the ESI should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation and is lost, the ESI was lost because the party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve the information, and the missing information cannot be restored or replaced with additional discovery. If this test is passed, the federal court may then impose remedies, or if intention is proved, order more serious sanctions. He explains that Rule 37(e) will make a more homogenous legal process for e-discovery, and will solve some of the controversy surrounding the costs of ESI preservation and e-discovery for businesses. Although the rule faces the Judicial Court, Supreme Court, and then Congress, Kurz believes it will go through and be effective in December 2015. James Kurz is a partner in the Alexandria VA law firm of Redmon, Peyton and Braswell LLP. His practice focuses on business litigation, including computer, software, and communications technologies cases. He also has an emphasis in the challenge of electronic discovery and the issues of information governance and co-wrote the white paper "The Long-Awaited Proposed FRCP Rule 37(e), Its Workings and Its Guidance for ESI Preservation." Special thanks to our sponsor, Digital WarRoom.

From "tweets" to Facebook status updates, social media has taken over how we communicate with the outside world. It has also become a large part of our legal system. Social media is now considered key evidence in both criminal cases and civil lawsuits. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the surge in social media-based evidence and claims in litigation, as well as the importance of educating attorneys on the ins and outs of social media with Attorney Antigone Peyton, Founder and CEO of Cloudigy® Law, PLLC and Attorney Ernest Svenson, solo attorney and blogger.

On this January edition of Law Technology Now, host and Law Technology News’ editor-in-chief, Monica Bay joins Cecil Lynn III, e-discovery counsel at Littler. Lynn, who is based in Phoenix, offers a sneak preview of his second annual "Year in Review" analysis of 2011’s most important electronic data discovery rulings.

The landmark Zubulake e-discovery decisions were the first of many to transform a narrow duty not to spoliate into a much broader duty to affirmatively preserve all possibly relevant evidence when there exists a "reasonable anticipation of litigation." But have these judicial opinions gone too far? In the December edition of Law Technology Now, Robert Owen, a partner at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, says it’s time to shift gears and restore the balance. He talks with Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News, about his five proposed rules that he says will prevent substantial injustices, yet be comprehensive and comprehensible.

In this January edition of Law Technology Now, host Monica Bay welcomes Cecil Lynn III , e-discovery counsel at Littler and Judy Kelly, senior producer for LegalTech and Virtual LegalTech. First, we hear from Cecil about the most important e-discovery cases of 2010, and his article that will appear in the inaugural issue of ALM’s redesigned Law Technology News magazine. Then it’s a sneak preview of LegalTech New York as Judy describes the show’s exciting keynotes and panels. We also welcome our new sponsor, LexisNexis!

From data dumps, to spoliation, to delay of litigation, ethics and e-discovery do not always go hand-in-hand. However, on this edition of Digital Detectives, co-hosts Sharon D. Nelson, Esq., President of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. and John W. Simek, Vice President of Sensei Enterprises, welcome the Honorable Herbert B. Dixon, Jr., who sits on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, to shed some light on the importance of ethics in e-discovery . Judge Dixon discusses the ethical rules which are most often violated in e-discovery, ethical issues surrounding the Pension Committee case, why ethics and e-discovery should be offered as a subject in law school and the unique issues in criminal law related to ethics and e-discovery.