Podcasts about Num

Great Restoration and Revival (3) (audio) David Eells – 12/7/25 Do you know why God speaks to us in parables as in Jesus, the Man-child's day? He said, To hide these things from the wise and prudent that He may reveal them unto babes… I want to share with you some revelations to help you and encourage you to be spiritually prepared for tribulation and the outpouring of the latter rain anointing.   Terrorism, Spiritual Invasion and Apostasy Don Lett - 06/22/2008 (David's notes in red) For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. (Eph.6:12) (At first, this appears to be a physical terrorist attack, but the further you read on, the more it is revealed to be a spiritual invasion and attack on the U.S. and Christians.) Somehow, I found out about a terrorist attack that was going to occur on an Air Force base where I was staying. Although this base seemed like a normal civilian area. (The U.S. is the eagle of the “Lion with Eagles Wings” of Babylon. It is called this partially because of its air superiority. I believe the U.S. is the air force base in the “normal civilian area”.) I was in a bathroom hiding, and I could see that a group of Caucasian, American-looking men had captured most of the leadership on the base. (The enemy looks like average Americans but has a foreign ideology and spirit.) I looked behind me and saw that the General of the base was incapacitated and a little bloody. He wasn't able to stop this attack. The terrorists were looking for him but couldn't find him. I decided that he was OK and that he would be safely hidden in this bathroom. (The corporate beast spirit body from the pit has infiltrated and captured the minds of most of the leadership of the U.S. and is using them for their one world order purposes against the saints.) In another room to my rear, I could see a baby being watched by an adult. They were safe for the time being in a glass room, but I had no idea what was getting ready to take place. (The alien terrorist attack is happening to raise up this dragon/beast entity over the U.S. and bring down the freedoms we have known in the past. The baby is the newborn corporate Man-child that the beast entity wants to extinguish, as Herod attempted in the Gospels and the dragon will attempt in the Rev.12 end-time parallel. However, this baby, although visible, is safely caught up to heavenly places in Christ. The beast that is taking over all nations is the real terrorist that will make war against the saints.) I was scared, but I also noticed there was an escape route to the rear. I had to warn the authorities on base. I went straight to the guard shack at the check-in point. When I told the guards that I needed to talk to someone immediately about something that was going to occur, an MP car pulled up. They suggested that I inform the MPs who were in the car. They rolled down their window, and I leaned down to begin to tell them about the terrorists. But then I remembered that part of the plan was to infiltrate the base with other terrorists. I wasn't sure if these were real MPs or terrorists in disguise. I asked the MPs in the guard shack if they had ever seen these individuals before. They said no. (We really don't know who can receive our warning of this invasion. Some whom we think are brethren we find out are really the enemy.) I went and spoke to another MP whom they did recognize. As I was explaining to him about the terrorists, several people from my past were walking by and casually listening with interest, but not alarm, like J____. The MP seemed interested but not alarmed either. But it appeared that he would take someone to investigate these claims. (Most authorities will not take this spiritual alien invasion seriously, and others have already been taken over by it.) Next thing you know, I was sitting at a long table with a group of other civilians who were eating. Most of them, it seems, knew that I had found out about this terrorist attack. Some family members then began to brag about T___, who they said was getting these amazing words from God. The method that she was getting this word was from occult spiritualism or witchcraft-type practice. (Many times masquerading as Christian gifts.) They thought of her as a white witch. When they explained this to me, I told them right away that this is not the way that God works and that she was being influenced by a familiar spirit, but they didn't believe me. Just then, a very old friend from my past, S____, began to tell me what a hypocrite I am because of something I had done to him when I was a teenager (30 years or so ago). I told him that I was sorry and explained to him about forgiveness and how I had completely forgotten about this incident that had held him in captivity for so long. I asked him to let it go. (Many will be taken in because they are turned over to the tormentors for their own unforgiveness.) I turned my attention back to T____. My family members continued to press me about how God was speaking through her and that she was a good witch. And I reiterated that God didn't work this way. I told them that if they would meet with me outside, I would lay hands on her and cast this demon out. They still didn't believe me, but decided to meet with me, probably to prove that she was getting the word from God. (Many today pay no attention to the source of knowledge and power in these fakes since they are infiltrated with the enemy, but if we hold fast to the scriptures, we will know them.) While walking to meet with her, I got mixed up in a Catholic procession. They were singing “Amazing Grace”, but I could not get in tune with the way they were singing it. I tried several times and eventually got frustrated and stopped walking and singing with them. (The righteous will not assimilate into the larger end-time Universal, meaning Catholic, religion of the new world order that turns grace into lasciviousness.) I ended up in a different room. I noticed T____ walking with the group as they were walking in a line up a ramped corridor. The wall between us had an opening about one foot high at the neck so that I could see the faces of those walking. T____ was walking with them. I remembered that she looked pretty, but something was very odd about her countenance. Everyone seemed to be walking in an almost trance-like state. (Those who are into the witchcraft of rebellion to the Word will be assimilated by the alien spirits.) I had to go downstairs to meet with her and found myself on an elevator with a bunch of other people. This elevator was wide open without even a handrail. As I was going down the elevator, I was praying that God could do this work through me. I was concerned that I had not been close enough to God lately to cast this powerful demon out. (Closeness to the Lord enables us to be useful in the deliverance of our brethren.) When I came downstairs, there were a lot of activities. A lot of people I knew were playing basketball. I wanted to join them, but I had to take care of this first. I was still very concerned that I wouldn't be able to cast this demon out. Several people stopped me on the way to that side of the room to say hi. I quickly said hi and continued to move toward my cousin. (Most are caught up in the game of competition and scoring points between the sects of Christianity and are unaware of the spiritual alien invasion in their midst.) When I finally made my way past the basketball court, more acquaintances whom I had not seen in a while wanted to say hi. I gave a friend of mine a hug and said hi, and continued to move on. Finally, I got face-to-face with T___. I told her that I was going to lay hands on her, and just as I began to lay hands on her, a very shapely woman, whom I had never met, dressed in a turquoise stretchy dress that was cut very low at the breasts and high on the thighs, came out of nowhere and approached me to hug me. None of this made any sense to me that such a beautiful lady, whom I had never seen before, would come up to me and decide to hug me. I knew this had to be the work of the enemy. (The harlot of apostate Christianity seeks to seduce those who seek to deliver its adherents.) I thought about some of David Eells' teachings, and I held my hand out and said, “Lord, take this demon away from me”. (Or maybe, “Don't allow this demon to touch me”.) I was astonished by what happened next. This lady was lifted off the ground about an inch or two and slid backward about 10 to 15 feet and landed in a chair. She had her back arched, and you could see spiritual demonic activity above her chest. This startled me so much that I awoke from the dream. (The Word will cause the elect to recognize strong delusions of apostasy.)   My Interpretation: The Air Force base is the U.S. “This building (the Pentagon) will be attacked 3 million times today”. It is protected by the Air Force from cyberattacks. Terrorists are not Muslims; they are ordinary-looking Americans. Christian babies are somewhat protected, but they are totally unaware of the dangers. They are protected for a time, but the room is made of glass. These people have infiltrated a large part of our police forces (and government organizations). People will listen mostly out of interest but not out of concern. People have no problem listening to false prophets, but don't believe the Word of God. Satan will attempt to divert us from our mission by using: False prophets Past wrongs you committed Family members False religions You question your confidence in your walk with the Lord Extra-curricular activities Friends Lusts The Personality Profiles: J____- nominal but professing Christians, with very little biblical knowledge and virtually no relationship with Christ S____ - former Christian having fallen from the faith. Atheist or agnostic at best T____ - little or no biblical knowledge, professing a relationship with God   The Cross Revives the Church  Eve Brast - 10/04/2016 (David's notes in red) I dreamed that my son Elijah and I were making our way through crowds of frustrated people in an airport. (Elijah represents the John the Baptist ministry calling God's people to repentance.) (Without repentance God's people cannot live in heavenly places above this world. (Mal.4:5) Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and terrible day of Jehovah come. 6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers; lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. The children don't know their fathers in the faith. All they have known is Babylonian false prophets and haven't grown up.) The people were angry and frustrated because an announcement had been made overhead that all flights were "delayed" and no one knew why. (Flights being delayed are representative of earthly bondages continuing.) Why do earthly bondages continue? They don't know their need because they don't know their spiritual fathers. (Eph.1:3) Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ... All of our needs are supplied in heavenly places by abiding in Christ, Who is the Word. When we do not depart from the Word, we are a heavenly creation with heavenly benefits. Right behind John's repentance came Jesus and the church fathers.) (I asked Father for a word concerning the announcement of the delayed flights in the airport and received (Isa.1:25) I will turn my hand on you, thoroughly purge away your dross, and will take away all your tin. 26 I will restore your judges as at the first, and your counselors (Fathers) as at the beginning. Afterward you shall be called 'The city of righteousness, a faithful town'.) As we came up to the last terminal (time is running out), an older woman with blonde hair that had streaks of gray throughout, wearing a head covering, came up to us and pleaded with us to come and help her daughter, who was being a rebellious teenager. She was concerned because her daughter would not obey her concerning staying home and helping her clean the house and her bedroom. (Representing sanctification or "holiness without which no man shall see the Lord".) She kept sneaking out of the house to hang out with her friends at the mall and go shopping. (This woman represents the original church whose daughter has gone astray [in immature rebellion]. I believe there is one daughter in this dream because she represents the elect of God who will return to the true church. (Time is running out for the rebels to escape the power of this world before the judgments come. (Rom.2:3) And reckonest thou this, O man, who judgest them that practise such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? (The rebellious teenager/church is about to miss her plane to safety.) (Luk.21:34) But take heed to yourselves, lest haply your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and that day come on you suddenly as a snare: 35 for so shall it come upon all them that dwell on the face of all the earth. (Meaning those not in heavenly places in Christ.) 36 But watch ye at every season, making supplication, that ye may prevail to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man. (Heb.2:3) how shall we escape, if we neglect so great a salvation? which having at the first been spoken through the Lord, was confirmed unto us by them that heard. (Heavenly places is to be caught up to the throne of God's authority over this cursed world.) 4 God also bearing witness with them, both by signs and wonders, and by manifold powers, and by gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to his own will. 5 For not unto angels did he subject the world to come, whereof we speak. 6 But one hath somewhere testified, saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? Or the son of man, that thou visitest him? 7 Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; Thou crownedst him with glory and honor, And didst set him over the works of thy hands: 8 Thou didst put all things in subjection under his feet. (To be in the heavens is to have everything worldly and all of the curse under your feet.) For in that he subjected all things unto him, he left nothing that is not subject to him. But now we see not yet all things subjected to him. (Whose fault is that? Jesus said that we have heavenly authority over this earth and its curse in (Mat.16:19) I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. (Rev.3:21) He that overcometh (the teenager rebellion and lust), I will give to him to sit down with me in my throne, as I also overcame, and sat down with my Father in his throne.) While the woman was lamenting to us about the daughter, I noticed an escalator off to the side of the terminal. I noticed that there were many people packed onto the downside (falling away) and only two or three individuals going up on the upside (those ascending to heavenly throne authority) to the next level. (Only one out of the four bore fruit in the parable of the sower.) (We are called to heavenly places, which are in Christ. Much of the church is earth-bound because they have not learned to abide in Christ, Who is the Word.) Then the woman's voice came back into my focus and hearing as Elijah was agreeing that we would go with her to her house and help her daughter. (The Bride will bring repentance to the rebellious church but not before some judgment arrives.) The scene changed as we found ourselves standing at the entrance to the daughter's bedroom from within the house. The mother was opening the door and gesturing for us to enter. Her daughter's room looked like a shop at the mall. (Love of the earthly stops one from receiving love of the heavenly places.) Shoe displays and mannequin torsos were displaying risqué teen clothing. (Many are in idolatry [and lust] with the world.) The mother explained that the daughter was hardly ever home, choosing to be at the mall and with her friends over home life with the family. (The heavenly family has been departed from, for earthly pursuits. We all know people like this who are full of excuses, but they will find out too late that they didn't eat their Word.) Elijah and I (Eve, the Bride) began to walk around the room to get an idea of what to say to the daughter and how to help her. I noticed a white door with glass panes in the top half, and on the other side of the room, which led into the room from the outside. There was a short hall entryway between the room and the door. (The door is Christ and represents salvation.) I noticed some activity going on in the entryway. (This is where most of the Church stops, not bearing the fruit of Christ in their soul and ministry.) David was busy doing something. Then Michael came up to us and began explaining about a project that David had been working on for a while for this girl. Michael showed me a few of the nails that he had helped gather for the project. He had quite a few gathered in a small silver metal bucket near the wall of the entryway. (The nails are to hold our flesh on our cross so that we may have the resurrection life of Christ in heavenly places of throne authority.) (David and Michael are representative of the Man-child ministers who have been prepared and are preparing for this end-time harvest.) Suddenly, a bunch of the Local UBM brethren came into the room in the same direction that Elijah and I had entered. I saw that everyone was cooperating with one another to transform the daughter's room. (The apostate Church will see a role model in the Bride that they never did in their leadership.) I saw M. L. consulting with the other ladies to alter all the clothing into more appropriate things for the daughter to wear. (The mature don't flash flesh, they crucify it. Modesty is a necessity.) The men were discussing how to move around some of the shelves (too many of God's things are on shelves) and bring in appropriate furniture for a bedroom. (To rest in faith in God's promises.) (Being in one accord and one Spirit with body ministry for our little sister.) (It appears a little sister was matured and glorified. (Psa.45:13) The king's daughter within the palace is all glorious: Her clothing is inwrought with gold. 14 She shall be led unto the king in broidered work: The virgins her companions that follow her Shall be brought unto thee. 15 With gladness and rejoicing shall they be led: They shall enter into the king's palace. 16 Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children, Whom thou shalt make princes in all the earth. And it appears that she became a spiritual mother to many.) Then the door to the outside opened, and David stepped over the threshold carrying a large, lightweight transparent cross over his right shoulder. (The Davids will first bear the cross to death of themselves so that they may give it to others. (Heb.12:2) looking unto Jesus the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising shame, and hath sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.) Michael said excitedly, "There it is. That's the project!" I asked Father for a word concerning David and Michael and the project and received 1 Timothy 2:5 (context: 5,6). (1Ti.2:5) For there is one God, one mediator also between God and men, himself man, Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself a ransom for all; the testimony to be borne in its own times. (Just as Jesus paid the price for us to be freed, so will He do it in the Man-child, and much fruit will be borne. (Joh.12:24) Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a grain of wheat fall into the earth and die, it abideth by itself alone; but if it die, it beareth much fruit.) David knelt down and gently laid the cross down with the foot at the threshold and the head where the room began. He reached over the cross and pulled the bucket of nails toward him as Michael went over and handed him a heavy hammer. As David pulled the nails out of the bucket, they began to light up a beautiful sky blue like neon signs. He nailed them in groups of three at all four points on the cross. (Giving others an example of death to self. There were 12 blue nails representing discipleship. This cross bridges the gap so that those who are without can enter the house. (Representing the now-holy house and place of heavenly provision. No cross, no crown.]) Once David had finished, the daughter came home, and as she stood looking in amazement at the entryway, she couldn't believe that David had cared enough to do that for her. She was so touched that she had to come in and see the rest of the room. (The Church's eyes will be opened through the crucifixion of the Man-child, and they will enter into the Kingdom life.) She was amazed at how we had all worked together to transform her room, and she really liked what she saw. Everything was so new to her as she walked around admiring the transformation. I went over to her as she stood in front of some shelves that the men had restored. I watched her pick up some sort of tool off the shelf, wondering what it was. It had a part of it that glowed blue like the nails in the cross. I began to explain to her what it was and how to use it. Her face was filled with wonder as I watched her transform before my eyes into a young boy with beautiful blonde hair. (The transformation of our little sister into Christlikeness through our witness and examples. Showing her how to use the tools of the Gospel in order to overcome.) Then I woke up. I asked Father for a verse or text for this dream and received by random John 20:19 (context: 19-23). (Joh.20:19) When therefore it was evening, on that day, the first day of the week, and when the doors were shut where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. 20 And when he had said this, he showed unto them his hands and his side. (Proofs of crucifixion and resurrection.) The disciples therefore were glad, when they saw the Lord. 21 Jesus therefore said to them again, Peace be unto you: as the Father hath sent me, even so send I you. (Through spiritual crucifixion and resurrection.) 22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Spirit (The great power of God to lose our life to gain Jesus' life and ministry.): 23 whose soever sins ye forgive, they are forgiven unto them; whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.   Spiritual Food for the Tribulation Janie McManus - 04/30/2009 (David's notes in red) Generally, I wake up early, by 6:00 AM, to pray and read the Word, but this morning when I awoke, I wanted to sleep some more. It was my day off and I had a long list of things to do, and I thought, Oh no, what will happen if I stay in bed? Then I sensed the Holy Spirit say, “Sleep. I want to give you a gift”. I drifted off into sleep and dreamed I was within a group of people being herded along urban streets, and jostling among folks. (This is in the hard times of tribulation when the World Beast will take charge of people's lives.) I realized that I was not among people I knew, but we seemed about the same middle, lower-middle class crowd -- no one too fancy, and basically healthy. So I am standing in the middle of all these sacks of grain, and we have to move, suddenly, like we were being driven, so I asked the ones around me, “Can you help me carry these sacks?” (The Word we need to live by), and they laughed, saying, “No need to drag that along; we get plenty to eat”. (Those who set aside obedience to the scripture.) But I figured, this is perfectly good grain, and I am not going to just throw it away, so I loaded my pack and pockets, and we walked and jogged on. (Revival among the poor, outside the camp of mainstream churchianity, who will “load up” on the grain of God's Word.) Soon we stopped, out on this country road, and long board tables were set out, and we were instructed to line up on the sides, and then plates were put in front of us filled with this mush, which, on closer inspection, was filled with maggots. Looking up and down the length of the table, I saw people just pick up the plates and start shoveling it in. (The Beast and their false prophets will feed their corrupt teachings to the spiritually starving.) Needless to say, I was NOT hungry, so I wandered away from the table and snatched a few grains to chew on.  Immediately, I could hear the boots of these uniformed troops as they rushed up to the table to see if the food was eaten and all the plates were empty, except mine. In a gruff voice, they asked, “Whose plate is this?” and everyone who had been alongside me turned and pointed to me, but the troops just stormed past me, as though I wasn't there. (Martial law will enforce the harlot's wishes on the multitudes, as in Jesus' day. Our site has testimonies of people being invisible to the enemy as they served the Lord. Jesus passed through the midst of those who would kill Him. Peter passed two trained guards as an angel led him out of prison.) This wearying trek of meals and marching kept being repeated, and I just munched on my grain and shared with anyone who asked for some. (The righteous will carry the Word to those hungry for life.) At first, everyone liked the sweet taste, but they didn't like chewing it, so they spit it out, preferring the gruel. (The clean beasts chew the cud until the Word is thoroughly digestible and useful to the body.) The ones who did eat from both sources became sort of shadowy and wispy (spiritual), but also fearful, and they began to hide. (Those who begin to mix the Word in with their traditions become more spiritual, but their corrupt lives are condemned, and they fear the Lord without an understanding of grace.) Then they refused to eat what I offered and they became “solid” (fleshly) again but everyone had sort of an oily, flabby, fleshy muscle tone, and they wheezed in an unhealthy way. (Those who hear the Word and turn back to walk in the flesh will be cursed. (2 Pet.2:20) For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein and overcome, the last state is become worse with them than the first. 21 For it were better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after knowing it, to turn back from the holy commandment delivered unto them. 22 It has happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog turning to his own vomit again, and the sow that had washed to wallowing in the mire.) Eventually, we came to a small strip mall that had already been looted, and all the folks rushed into the ransacked stores to see if there was anything they could yet steal. Some were stuffing CDs and techno things into their packs, which was dumb, since they had no electricity or batteries. (The mall represents the buying and selling of the merchants of Babylonish Christianity. They don't know that they have been plundered of anything useful and what is left is useless and powerless.) In the strip mall, I saw that there was a Christian bookstore and, although the windows were smashed, the shelves had been swept clear (no knowledge of God left) and piles of books were on the floor. (What knowledge was there was on the lowest level. The smashed windows represent no clear vision.) I went and picked up a book off the floor and, when I lifted it, all this ash fell out; I looked at the pages, and they were completely empty. When I sifted through the ashes, I found a few little stones. When I licked one off, it proved to be a tiny diamond, hard and translucent. (The only value in the teachings of Babylon is when they quote the scriptures. Nothing else will endure the fires of tribulation.) I wrestled with whether I ought to pocket the tiny diamonds or leave them behind. I searched for some Bibles but found none. (The Word will not be found in the government-approved churches.) I went up to a full bookshelf and opened a standing book. Instantly, the printed words crumbled and slid off the page -- all of them except some bold-print quotes. Suddenly, these leapt off the page and coiled up like microfilm (hidden treasures) and fell at my feet. I realized these words were direct Bible quotes and they were the tiny diamonds. So I scooped up as many as I could gather before the marching orders were barked out. (The Bible will be treasured by the hungry and destroyed by the wicked.) The people were gathering out in the front parking lot of the mall, so I went out to join them. They saw all the diamonds I had, tackled me and looted me! They were shaking me down and gulping down the diamonds by the fistful, without even chewing them, and then left me on the curb, in the middle of nowhere, and went on. (Those apostates who hear but do not digest the Word of truth will persecute the righteous. (Mat.7:6) Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast your pearls before the swine, lest haply they trample them under their feet, and turn and rend you.) I saw that the back door of the store was standing open, and I dragged myself over to the door. There was an enormous interior space that was floored like a warehouse, and there were people in low wheelchairs scooting back and forth, from one end of the mall to the other. I felt afraid for them, realizing that they were the ones who would be culled from the herd, but I “understood” that these were below the radar: “In their weakness, God's strength is made perfect”; so, even though they were physically handicapped, they were rather healthier than the others. (Those whom the world considers crippled and unworthy of its company, God chooses and protects. (1 Cor.1:26) For behold your calling, brethren, that not many wise after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, [are called]: 27 but God chose the foolish things of the world, that he might put to shame them that are wise; and God chose the weak things of the world, that he might put to shame the things that are strong; 28 and the base things of the world, and the things that are despised, did God choose, [yea] and the things that are not, that he might bring to nought the things that are: 29 that no flesh should glory before God.) On the far end, there was a kindly woman who was feeding the handicapped handfuls of the diamonds. The kindly woman was spry and very old (strength and maturity); she came up and asked me if I was a Christian. I said yes, and then she asked, “How do you know?” I began sobbing and saying, “I was hungry and thirsty” (I felt like a little child who was over-tired). I then said, “Because I only want to eat diamonds” (You know you are a Christian when you hunger and thirst for the pure Word. (Mat.18:3) and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven. 4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.) This made me cry even more because I felt I had given the wrong answer. I started wailing and weeping and saying, “I gave all the grain I had to the others, and they hate me. I try to walk with them and I share what I have, and I don't make trouble”. (Many “on fire Christians” have had the sad experience of trying but failing to fit in among the apostates and being persecuted for it.) I went on and on about all the stuff I had done, knowing it all sounded so foolish, and I was overcome with exhaustion and was sobbing uncontrollably. (Failure to reach many lost souls with the true Word will be a grief to many saints.) She gently put her hand on my shoulder and said, “You must go on now”. Suddenly, she paused, turned and asked me, “Do you know how to get more diamonds whenever you want?” Before I answered, she held up a single page of NT scripture for me to see. The page was almost sheer, and the lettering was moving like tiny rivulets of water (as “living water”) and she asked me, “Do you recognize any of this?” I began crying and with such intense joy that it hurt, and I could not even see through my tears. I reached up to try and grab the whole page to try to stuff it in my mouth, but she would not let me lay hold of it. (Reading it too fast and missing the details.) Laughing, she said, “No, you sit still and read the words so you can hear what they say and see what they mean”. Calming myself down, I sat to read, and whenever I came to words I knew, they suddenly froze and became like a sticker or label. (As we meditate on the Word, it becomes real to us -- digested into our being.) She said, “Peel them off and eat that,” so I did just that. Some passages I ate 10 or 15 times, but immediately after peeling off the label/passage, they were replaced. So, like a hungry man, I gorged myself and thought I could eat until I fell asleep. She said, “Now, you can keep eating whenever you want, or you can lug the grain sack around”. I was puzzled and asked, “Where will I carry it?” and she said, “It is in your mind and in your heart, but you must stand still and look for it and ask for it; there it will be”. (There is a time when we only carry the Word of God in our hand, but as we digest it, the Holy Spirit is able to bring it up out of our hearts to meet the needs around us.) Then she again said, “You must go on now”. Now I was greatly strengthened, rested and fed. I even began to wake up, ready to conquer the day, but I heard her voice say, “Wait, there is more”, and I fell into sleep again, into the same dream. I was being dragged out of the crowd in the middle of a campground by some of the people I had fed earlier, and they began dragging me toward the troops. I didn't feel a bit afraid and I wasn't resisting. I said to them, “Let's just stand here; they can come over to us”, which they did immediately! (The apostate church will use the beast government to persecute those whose doctrine doesn't please their flesh.) The troops asked, “Where is she?” and the others said, “Right here, between us”, which I thought was odd; they would have had to be blind not to see me. (God will, in some cases, physically blind the wicked to protect His saints. They are “hidden with Christ in God”. The spiritual blindness of the OT law and the letter of the Word “veils” the eyes and mind of apostate persecutors.) So they instructed the ones holding me to restrain me, but I calmly stood up straight and tall, and watched as one of the troops lifted an enormous sword (like in the movie Braveheart) high above his head, and in slow motion watched it drop to the crown of my head. It sliced me right in half, all the way to my ankles, and there at my feet were all my clothes and all around my feet was a pile of these diamonds, like I was some sort of grain sack that had been slit open. (Just as Jesus was “the Word made flesh”, so it will be with His disciples. The persecution will reveal this to those who have eyes to see.) I felt the embarrassment of a dream when you are completely naked, yet no one even saw me, so I stood still. The ones holding my arms let go of me and dove on top of my clothing and started tearing them, eating them, ripping them up, and passing them around. (When Jesus was naked and crucified, they parted His garments. The garments of the righteous represent the “righteous acts of the saints”, as in Rev.19:8,14. The apostates devour the righteous through their denigrating words and accusations. (Gal.5:15) But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.) Oddly, everyone wanted some of the fabric, and everyone was gobbling up the diamonds, but completely forgot about me. (In the same way, they will criticize the truths of the Word that the saints have become, but God will reprobate them.) When they turned away to march on, I noticed that no longer were they people, but almost like half-pig, half-human, and the feces that fell behind them were loaded with the diamonds -- unchewed, undigested, and unharmed -- just dirty. (Like sows that had washed, they return to wallow in the mire. The church world and its greedy leadership have polluted the truths of God's Word. They have not digested the true meaning of the Scriptures. Please read all of Eze.34. Verse (Eze.34:18) Seemeth it a small thing unto you to have fed upon the good pasture, but ye must tread down with your feet the residue of your pasture? and to have drunk of the clear waters, but ye must foul the residue with your feet? 19 And as for my sheep, they eat that which ye have trodden with your feet, and they drink that which ye have fouled with your feet.) I reached out, hesitant to touch the “stuff” but saw my hand was covered in a white glove, so I looked for something to put the rescued diamonds in and wondered where I would get water to wash them off. I squatted down and saw (to my relief) that my knees were covered in this satiny, sheer curtain-like fabric, and low down I could hear water trickling. (The humble may go to their knees to find wisdom from God to turn the polluted hearts of the deceived to the pure Word. The white glove represents works of righteousness, as you take the clean water of the Word and Spirit.) I noticed then that ALL OVER the ground lay bodies of dead people. I was horrified and astounded. So I stood up and began to sing. The more I sang, the more clearly I could see the bodies. Some were being eaten by grubs, but others were rather like fertile ground, and when I flipped them over, they were filled with earthworms. In those bodies, I “planted” some of the diamonds, just out of curiosity. Suddenly, I watched the diamonds unfurl, and all the letters began sprouting roots and tendrils; they were alive! I became engrossed in putting out the diamonds, like one planting seeds by hand in a furrow. (The true gospel saves, heals, delivers, and resurrects those who are dead in sin.) When I looked back, the field was filling with people coming out of the ground, who immediately turned to begin tilling the ground and planting bodies! We were all quite busy and a multitude was coming alive. (The sowers of the Word will sow the seed and bring forth life in others, who in turn go to work in the field.) I woke myself up, shook off sleep, got out of bed, and went to start a load of laundry, thinking, ‘Now that was weird!' (We have been exhorted by this dream to clean up the garments of our works so that we are not partakers of the defilements of Babylon by their religious spirits. (Exo.19:10) And Jehovah said unto Moses, Go unto the people, and sanctify them to-day and to-morrow, and let them wash their garments... (Num. 8:21) And the Levites purified themselves from sin, and they washed their clothes... (31:24) And ye shall wash your clothes on the seventh day, and ye shall be clean; and afterward ye shall come into the camp.) I have a little box of scripture verses that are about 70 years old, from my grandmother's house, next to my washing machine. So, waiting for the water to fill the tub, I chose a card at random to read; it was (Mat. 7:7) Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.   Wolves and the John the Baptist Revival Eve Brast - 04/27/2016 (David's notes in red) Wolves of all kinds wait to pick off the new believers in this revival before they can mature. Pray for them, brethren, and do spiritual warfare against the demonic enemies. This repentance revival must succeed, or a great curse will come upon this country. John the Baptist came in the spirit of Elijah, according to Jesus. (Mal.4:5) Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and terrible day of Jehovah come. (6) And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers; lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. Are these apostate leaders the children's fathers? No, the early Church fathers are their fathers. And the Man-child, Bride, and witnesses are their fathers. This revival will point them to these fathers. I dreamed I had just given birth to my son Elijah on top of a large white round table in the center of a cafeteria. My husband was standing to my right and holding my hand. (Her husband represents the Lord.) He was so happy and proud of his new son. We both knew the baby was very special. (I believe this represents the Bride birthing through prayer the John the Baptist revival, which precedes Jesus in the Man-child reformers.) Then, some cafeteria workers posing as hospital nursery employees came to take Elijah to the nursery and asked us if we wanted him circumcised. (Cafeteria workers are they who feed spiritual or, in this case not spiritual food. They are acting as though they are ordained to take care of this revival, to cut away the flesh, but it is they who are flesh. The false leaders always try to hijack any true revival trying to impose their unscriptural foolishness. We must do warfare against this.) My husband emphatically said, “No. That's not necessary anymore”. So they left the room with Elijah. I assumed they would take care of him. (We bind this leaven masquerading as Christianity from this repentance revival.) I then went and got in line with some other people to get a tray of food. The cafeteria workers all had disposable white hair nets. A young, tall, lanky guy and a short woman put various food items on my plate and handed me the tray. I saw that they had put shredded pork on my plate, and I said, “I'm not allowed to eat pork. My husband doesn't allow it”. (This is spiritual. Our Lord does not allow us to partake of their unclean fleshly nature, words, spirits and teachings. Like pigs, their god is their belly.) When my hand touched the tray, I had an open vision. I saw Elijah lying on the floor in pain in another room. The cafeteria workers who had posed as hospital nursery workers had circumcised him and botched the procedure in addition. They had also stuffed pork into his mouth and he was lying there half choked from it. (These apostate ministries cutting off what they call “flesh” from this revival. Their unscriptural, overindulgent lives prove they do not know what flesh is. Adding their pork as a type of their unclean demon doctrines to choke the revival.) When the vision ended, I was back over at the table where I had given birth to Elijah. I was telling my husband what they had done to him, and then the “nursery worker” came up with the dried foreskin in her hand. She had a strange necklace around her neck with many others hanging from it, and she placed Elijah's dried foreskin onto her necklace, too. It was like a bizarre trophy necklace or something. (The demons in the false revival people want to claim this revival as their own for selfish ambition.) My husband was so angry that they did this to his son. I hurried into the room where they had left him to suffer and choke to death. I quickly picked him up and performed the infant version of the Heimlich maneuver on him that I had learned in a CPR class that I took at the hospital. (They must not be cut off from the breath of the Spirit.) I took a white baby blanket and wrapped him up in it, and carried him out of that cafeteria building and walked with him on a white covered concrete walkway over to the large UBM warehouse next door. (Just as John said in (Joh.3:30) He must increase, but I must decrease. The John the Baptist revival will morph into the Man-child revival of the Unleavened Bread and signs and wonders. But for God's people to escape the judgments promised, there must be repentance. This revival must succeed.)   THE CONDITION FOR PROPHECY TO COME TO PASS OR NOT AND THE CURSE (Jer.18:1) The word which came to Jeremiah from Jehovah, saying, (2) Arise, and go down to the potter's house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words. (3) Then I went down to the potter's house, and, behold, he was making a work on the wheels. (4) And when the vessel that he made of the clay was marred in the hand of the potter, he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make it. (5) Then the word of Jehovah came to me, saying, (6) O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith Jehovah. Behold, as the clay in the potter's hand, so are ye in my hand, O house of Israel. (This pot has to be handled roughly to get the clay back in a moldable form. This remolding of the clay historically has involved judgment until the clay is repentant.) (7) At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up and to break down and to destroy it; (8) if that nation, concerning which I have spoken, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them. (9) And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it; (10) if they do that which is evil in my sight, that they obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them. (11) Now therefore, speak to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith Jehovah: Behold, I frame evil against you, and devise a device against you: return ye now every one from his evil way, and amend your ways and your doings. (12) But they say, It is in vain; for we will walk after our own devices, and we will do every one after the stubbornness of his evil heart.   Great Holy Spirit Revival & Escape Eve Brast - 05/04/2016 (David's notes in red) I dreamed I was in the spirit, floating right above the waters of the Red Sea. (This is after the Passover that brought death to the Egyptians and freedom to God's people just before the wilderness tribulation on the other side of the sea.) I was looking toward the bank on the shore, which was dark. (The way of escape from Pharaoh's army or martial law is not clear.) I saw a small tongue of fire come down out of heaven and alight on top of the waters. (The tongue of fire is the baptism of the Holy Spirit. (Act.2:3) And there appeared unto them tongues parting asunder, like as of fire; and it sat upon each one of them. (4) And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. This individual tongue of fire is the anointed Man-child from Heaven. This is the Man-child revival that follows the John the Baptist revival. Like Moses they are to bring the people into and through the wilderness tribulation.) Suddenly, all the waters were set on fire and they parted with great force and power as if Moses himself had struck them with his staff! (Jesus in the Man-child by His Word and anointing will divide the sea and make a way of escape from Pharaoh's army and his FEMA camps, as Moses did. (Exo.14:16) And lift thou up thy rod, and stretch out thy hand over the sea, and divide it: and the children of Israel shall go into the midst of the sea on dry ground.) They became two flaming walls of fire, and between them, the tongue of fire landed on the dry seabed, and it lit up the shoreline. (The anointed Man-child made the way of escape clear when it looked impossible.) I could then see a set of 12 stone steps (representing the 12 tribes of New Testament Spiritual Israel) leading down from the top of the shoreline to the seabed. Then all these modern-day people from all the different denominations were lit up in the dark, and they began descending the steps to go across. A man who was also dressed in modern-day clothing was the first to descend and was at the head of them to go into the wilderness and on to the Promised Land. Then I woke up. (What would it take to unify all the true people of God to seek Him and spiritually leave Egypt, as a type of the world, and head toward the promises of the Promised Land? The John the Baptist repentance revival would have wised up many to the bondage of the Pharisees and Sadducees and their dead religion by then. Pharaoh had made slaves of the people of God, somewhat like our Pharaoh, and fierce judgments had fallen on the worldly at Passover. Could this be engineered economic collapse, earthquakes, volcanic activity, and martial law? The judgments on Egypt so the people can escape. I asked the Lord, “Will martial law come?” and got two heads for “yes”. I asked, “Can it be overturned by our faith?” and got two tails for “no”. And this was fulfilled for we are in it now. Pharaoh's army was about to bring them into bondage when God divided the Red Sea. At this point, they were unified by the baptism of the Holy Spirit. (1Co.10:1) For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; (2) and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud [baptism of the Holy Spirit] and in the sea [water baptism].) I asked the Lord, if we went the Trump route, would the earthquakes not come and He said, “No”. In other words, the quakes are coming. They are a sign of the coming Man-child reformers.   White Glove Inspection Sandy Shaw - 2/11/18 (David's notes in red) At the beginning of this dream, I am standing in front of an extraordinarily large white house. In real life, there is no way that you would see a house this large on Earth. (At this time, there are no people who this white house can represent but the Bride. Certainly not the larger Church. But the Bride's job is to bring this purity to the Church as did Jesus' early disciples.) The steps leading up to the door were made of gold. (The steps of Gold are the most valuable steps a person could take to go through the door who is Jesus.) But the top step had an adjoining white marble floor that ran throughout the whole house. There are two pillars that start where the gold ends. There were two double doors, bright white (Lampros garment of the Bride) made of a substance that I didn't know. (This entrance represents righteous acts Rev.19:8 And it was given unto her that she should array herself in fine linen, bright [Greek: Lampros] and pure: for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. The gold plates around the door handles had an intricate design around the edges. The handles were of round crystal. I opened the doors and in front of me is a huge room. And I strained my eyes to see how far it goes. Then I looked to the left of me, and there were hundreds of doors to the rooms and the same on the right. I'm wearing a white robe with white gloves to the elbows. (The Bride cleaning her house, representing righteous Works) I went to the first door and went to the upper right-hand corner, and then went diagonally down to the left corner. I opened the door and went into the room and closed the door. And did it again on the opposite side. Then I opened the door. And then I inspected the walls. I took my finger and by my height, I slid it across to the corner. (The white glove inspection. If dirt comes up on the finger, there is unrighteousness in the house of the Bride.) Then, from the wall, I bent down to inspect the floor. It passed inspection, so I walked to the bed, bent down, and put my hand under the bed and then I stood up. Then I looked at the bed. (Representing the rest through faith) It was made up of white satin-like fabric. I can see my handprint from kneeling down, so I took my hands and smoothed out the wrinkle that I had made. (The Bride is the first of the Church to be without spot and wrinkle.) The three white pillows were soft and very inviting. Then I walked to the nightstand and gave it the white glove test. There was a beautiful crystal vase. In it were a dozen white roses all at the perfect stage of openness. (Fruit born through water of the Word – A present from the Groom. Rev. 22:1 And he showed me a river of water of life, bright as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb, The fragrance of them was throughout the whole room. Then I looked to see the amount of water in the vase. The only color in this dream was the stems. Then I walked to the window and pushed aside the curtain. The window was so clear that you couldn't see it. (Pure of sight) Then I took my finger and went from the upper right corner to go diagonally to the left. There were two windows in the room. They were open an inch each. A slight breeze was coming in. (Breath of the Holy Spirit) Now there was a coolness that blended with the warmness, and you felt it together to make a perfect temperature. I then checked the curtains, and then I walked to the door. I turned around to look at the room for the last time. I noticed that the curtains were barely moving with a slight breeze. Then I remembered to look up at the ceiling. There was no ceiling...just a beautiful deep blue. (Heavenly perspective. Son shining in.) I did this in all the rooms on the right and on the left. In the huge room, I ran my finger over the floor while walking to the kitchen. The kitchen has a white swivel door. Everything is still white. The first thing I saw was a row of ovens. (To bake the pure unleavened Bread of the Word and Body of the Bride.) I know that there are forty ovens. I walk over to give them the test. Then from there I went to the four vintage farmhouse sinks, and they passed inspection. Then I went to the four huge refrigerators, and I opened them. There was no food in them. (To be pure and white, you must have eaten the food of the bread and wine of the life of Jesus.) Inside was only a rectangular glass container that held water with a silver spigot. (Silver kills contaminants in Water. The Water of the Word must be clean of leaven.) All four refrigerators were the same. Then I did the floor test again. There was a door on the right side of the kitchen that went into a very small hall. This led into a big room. At the other end of the room was a huge chair that looked like it was made for a giant. A man was sitting in it with pure white hair and garment. (Rev.1:13 and in the midst of the candlesticks one like unto a son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about at the breasts with a golden girdle. 14 And his head and his hair were white as white wool, white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire.) I walked slowly and said very softly, “Sir,” and he said, “Yes.” The inspection is done.” And he said, “OK.” Then I woke up. My feeling was one of total relief and acceptance from Him, and He was pleased. I received by faith at random this text for this dream: Finger was on vs 26, “he made.” Acts 17:24 The God that made the world and all things therein, he, being Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; 25 neither is he served by men's hands, as though he needed anything, seeing he himself giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26 and he made of one every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons, and the bounds of their habitation; 27 that they should seek God, if haply they might feel after him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us: 28 for in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain even of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring. 29 Being then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and device of man. 30 The times of ignorance therefore God overlooked; but now he commandeth men that they should all everywhere repent:   Worldwide Holy Spirit Outpouring  Samuel Paguaga - 09/21/2010 (David's notes in red) I think this dream tops all my spiritual dreams in its intensity and revelation. In it, I was in a small gathering of sorts. We were talking and then praying. A bit more had happened before that, but I think the point of this event is that none of what had happened before this mattered. All of a sudden, it was like when you step out of your home straight into the sun at noon. I was overwhelmed with light/energy, not as much as to blind the eyes, but more of a light/energy that penetrated to every cell and fiber of my body. I felt I was no longer physical or fleshly but a new being. As I looked straight forward in front of me, the physical world began to fade, but not because it was disappearing; it was because I began to perceive it in a new way, with new senses, and everything became almost transparent. I looked up and began to speak words in a new language. I was confessing something. Although I could not understand the words, I could feel them in my being. The words were energizing and vibrating my being, my frequency, my entity, my spirit. It was as if all of me became one: my spirit with my mind and my body. As I began to speak, my perception of my surroundings grew. I could feel, perceive, and see all those around me who were experiencing the same thing. First, the two people beside me; then, outwardly, the people in the place; then the whole block; then the city, and then the whole Earth. We, disciples of Christ, were all one and not because we perceived each other, but because we were confessing the same words and because the same flow of energy and power of the Holy Spirit was flowing through us. Although there was a worldwide outpouring, only the vessels of glory, the vessels of light, were filled to the seal. (This could be the first-fruits outpouring at the beginning of the tribulation.) I could feel the power and energy flowing through me, vibrating every part of my being. I spoke words and feelings became more and more intense, so much so that I could not even begin to describe them. I saw everything as white, yellowish, and orange lights, as if everything was transparent. I felt one with the source, at one with the words, and as one with everyone confessing these words. All these feelings of oneness occurred at three distinct levels. All of this along with a feeling of peace; it was as if this was a new nature, and I knew what it was. I experienced the whole thing even when I awoke. It seemed like I knew what was happening. I knew what the source was, what the energy and power was, and the meaning of the words. I woke up shortly afterward, possibly on the last word spoken, although in the dream it seemed like from that point on things would not be the same. As I awoke, I could almost feel the vibration of energy in my being as it dispersed into the normality of my awakened state. I always wondered, what does it mean to be one with God and His Christ and His Spirit ... and now I know. 

Chaque jour, en quelques minutes, un résumé de l'actualité culturelle. Rapide, facile, accessible.Notre compte InstagramDES LIENS POUR EN SAVOIR PLUSChanson IA - Pays Bas : Courrier International, Le Figaro, Sueddeutsche, GelderlanderEuphoria saison 3 : Les Numériques, Numéro Magazine, VogueRestauration Notre-Dame de Paris : Le Figaro, France 3 régionsFilm Monsieur Madame : 20 Minutes, BFMTV, Animation MagazineNetflix Warner : Le Monde, BBC, RTBFScarlett Johansonn Batman : Variety, KonbiniÉcriture : Eden AyachIncarnation : Blanche Vathonne Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Moses continues his instruction on the Feast of Tabernacles. We discuss how this might prophetically relate to the Last Days. We also catch a few last verses we missed on the law concerning Grain offerings. Num 29:23-38; Deut 16;13-15; Levit 23:37-44; Levit 1:1-17;6:8-13;Num 28:1-8;17:8-9 Levit 2:1-16; 6:14-23; Num 15:1-21. #everydaychristians

Today, we'll discuss the summary passages on the fellowship offerings, rules about the location of the sacrifices, and what to do about unintentional sin. Remember, we're still accountable. Lev 5:14-19; 6:1-7; 7:1-10, 37-38; Num 28:9-15; Deut 21:1-9;Lev 22:17-28; Ex 23:18; Lev 24:1-9; Num 6:22-27; Lev 21:1-24; 22:1-15. #everydaychristians

We're exploring more information on the Guilt Offering and the Sabbath offering. We'll also discuss the sacrifice for covering an unsolved murder. Finally, we'll look at the rules about imperfect sacrifices and the need for the priests to keep from being defiled. Lev 5:14-19; 6:1-7; 7:1-10, 37-38; Num 28:9-15; Deut 21:1-9;Lev 22:17-28; Ex 23:18; Lev 24:1-9; Num 6:22-27; Lev 21:1-24; 22:1-15 #everydaychristians

C'est le président français lui-même qui est monté au créneau. En fin de semaine dernière, Emmanuel Macron s'est dit favorable à une interdiction du portable par les lycéens. Une mesure déjà en vigueur dans les écoles et collèges, mais peu respectée. La Suède va encore plus loin, bannissant les écrans du matériel pédagogique et multipliant les investissements pour un retour aux manuels scolaires. Est-ce que tout est à jeter dans les écrans ? Peut-on encore en faire un bon usage ? Quel encadrement ? Pour en débattre : - Marie-Caroline Missir, déléguée générale du Think tank Vers le haut, dédié à la jeunesse et à l'éducation, ancienne directrice générale du Réseau Canopé  - Grégoire Borst, professeur de Psychologie du développement et de neurosciences cognitives de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, et directeur du LaPsyDé, Laboratoire de Psychologie du développement et de l'éducation de l'enfant à l'Université Paris Cité, CNRS - Agnès Fabre, cofondatrice de l'association Éducation Numérique Raisonnée.

Moses talks about some of the Lord's appointed Feasts: the Feast of Unleavened Bread, Passover, Feast of First fruits, Feast of Weeks (Pentecost), Feast of Trumpets. Ex 34:18; Deut 16:1-7; Num 9:13-14; Levit 23:4-8; Num 28:16-25; Deut 16:8, 9-14; Ex 34:22; Levit 23:15-21; Num 28:26-31; Levit 23:23-25; Num 29:1-6. #everydaychristians

We'll discuss reasons we should not ignore studying End Times. More instructions on Day of Atonement and Feast of Tabernacles, and how these relate to the Last Days. More about the scapegoat. Levit 16;1-6;11-1;18-19; 23-25; Num 29:7-11; Levit 16:7-10; 15-17;20-22; 26-28;29-34;23:26-32; Num 29:7-11; Levit 23:33-44; Num 29:12-22; Revelation 7; John 7:37. #everydaychristians

“Espera com confiança. Vive com alegria.” Promessa a Abraão Leitura bíblica em Génesis 12:1-3
 Neste segundo dia da nossa caminhada do Advento, somos transportados para um episódio determinante na vida de Abraão, um dos patriarcas de Israel e mais tarde designado como “amigo de Deus” (Tiago 2:23). Aos 75 anos de idade, é desafiado por Deus para mudar a sua vida, deixando uma área de conforto – a sua terra, a sua família e o seu lar – rumo ao desconhecido (v.1). As promessas e a bênção de Deus estavam, porém, no horizonte (vs.2-3). E Abraão prontamente obedeceu à chamada divina, constituindo um modelo de obediência e fé para as gerações futuras. A história da redenção da Humanidade continua a ser escrita pela própria mão de Deus: a genealogia do patriarca irá conduzir à promessa do Salvador, não só para a nação de Israel, mas para todas as nações do mundo – “E através de ti serão abençoados todos os povos do mundo” (v.3b), por intermédio de Cristo Jesus! Abraão tornou-se um peregrino em terra estranha. Num mundo cada vez mais hostil, de um modo geral, a Deus e aos valores ditos cristãos, não seremos também nós como peregrinos numa terra estranha? Contudo, somos chamados a ser bênção nessa “terra estranha”. O imperativo dirigido a Abraão: “Sê tu uma bênção!” (versão JFA), também o é para cada um de nós: sejamos bênção aonde quer que Deus nos coloque – no nosso círculo de familiares e amigos, junto de colegas e vizinhos, na nossa comunidade de fé, e até junto de desconhecidos com quem diariamente nos cruzamos.  O patriarca Abraão merece destaque no capítulo 11 de Hebreus, subordinado aos “heróis da fé”. No decurso da sua longa história de vida, encontramos outros exemplos notáveis de fé e obediência a Deus. E nós, que “marca” estamos a deixar para as gerações futuras? Que tenhamos a mesma prontidão para responder à chamada de Deus e obedecer à Sua vontade, abraçando o desafio que nos é lançado diariamente pelo Pai: “Sê tu uma bênção!”. - Nuno Conceição Neste tempo pede a Deus força para esperar com confiança. Agradece pela alegria que Ele coloca no teu dia. Entrega-Lhe aquilo que te preocupa. Pergunta: o que queres que eu faça hoje para viver mais perto de Ti?

Conheça todos os produtos FEO: https://beacons.ai/fisioemortopediaO episódio de hoje traz Diogo Gomes, fisioterapeuta brasileiro radicado em Melbourne, pesquisador dedicado às condições do quadril e, em especial, à síndrome do impacto Femoroacetabular.Num bate-papo leve, mas cheio de conteúdo, ele e o host revisitam a história desse diagnóstico, a fase em que “todo mundo tinha impacto”, o excesso de cirurgias e a diferença entre alteração anatômica no exame de imagem e síndrome clínica de fato.Com base nas pesquisas que Diogo desenvolve na Austrália, o episódio mostra como compreender melhor os achados radiológicos, como conectar sintomas e função e quais caminhos a fisioterapia pode seguir para avaliar e reabilitar esses pacientes com mais segurança e menos alarmismo.

Num episódio diferente e mais descontraído, abrimos os nossos favoritos do YouTube e conversamos sobre os canais que nos inspiram. E também os que os fazem revirar os olhos. Entre elogios e críticas, fizemos uma verdadeira viagem pelo universo dos YouTubers do mundo da corrida, desde os atletas de elite até aos criadores que transformaram o treino, a motivação e até o equipamento em conteúdo diário.Falamos de nomes como Ben is Running, Kofuzi, Cole Running, Philly Bowden, Sweat Elite, Lionel Sanders, Ben Parks, NN Running Team, Jacob Ingebrigtsen, entre muitos outros, analisando o que cada um traz (ou já deixou de trazer) ao mundo da corrida. Refletimos também sobre o equilíbrio entre treino e exposição, a autenticidade dos criadores, e o impacto deste tipo de conteúdo em quem corre.RecomendaçõesAlvarez Films RUNNING - https://youtube.com/@p.alvarezfilmsBen Is Running - https://youtube.com/@benisrunningBen Parkes - https://youtube.com/@benparkesBelieve in the Run - https://youtube.com/@believeintherunClayton Young - https://youtube.com/@_clayton_young_Cole Running - https://youtube.com/@colerunningSweat Elite - https://www.youtube.com/@sweatelite kofuzi - https://www.youtube.com/@kofuzi FPAtletismo TV - https://www.youtube.com/@FPAtletismotv Des Linden - https://www.youtube.com/@Des_Linden PCCA - https://youtube.com/@pccaLionel Sanders - https://youtube.com/@lionel.sandersDC Rainmaker - https://youtube.com/@dcrainmakerFloberg Runs - https://youtube.com/@flobergrunsJoe greer running - https://youtube.com/@ioerunningNick Bester - https://www.youtube.com/@justalilbester Ran To Japan - https://youtube.com/@rantojapanPhily Bowden - https://youtube.com/@philybowdenJakob A. Ingebrigtsen - https://youtube.com/@jakcy12Jake Wightman - https://youtube.com/@jakeswightmanNN Running Team - https://youtube.com/@nnrunningteamLionel Sanders vs Sam Long - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bPfinho1u0 Parcerias e como ajudarem este projeto

CLICK TO PRINT READING CLICK TO GO TO COMMENTS 7993 Verses 43-49. And Jehovah said unto Moses and Aaron, This is the statute of the passover; no son of an alien shall eat of it. And every man’s servant that is bought with silver, when thou hast circumcised him, then shall he eat of it. A lodger and a hireling shall not eat of it. In one house shall it be eaten; thou shalt not bring out of the flesh abroad from the house; and ye shall not break a bone thereof. All the assemblage of Israel shall perform it. And when a sojourner shall sojourn with thee, and performeth the passover to Jehovah, every male of his shall be circumcised, and then let him come near to perform it; and he shall be as a native of the land; and no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. One law shall there be for the native, and for the sojourner that sojourneth in the midst of you. “And Jehovah said unto Moses and Aaron,” signifies information by means of truth Divine; “This is the statute of the passover,” signifies the laws of order for those who are liberated from damnation and infestations; “no son of an alien shall eat of it,” signifies that those who are not in truth and good are to be separated from them; “and every man’s servant,” signifies a man who is still natural; “that is bought with silver,” signifies who has any spiritual truth; “when thou hast circumcised him,” signifies purification from unclean loves; “then he shall eat of it,” signifies that he shall be with them; “a lodger and a hireling shall not eat of it,” signifies that they who do what is good from mere natural disposition, and those who do it for the sake of their own advantage, are not to be with them; “in one house shall it be eaten,” signifies consociations of accordant goods, that they may together make one good; “thou shalt not bring out of the flesh abroad from the house,” signifies that this good shall not be mixed together with the good of another; “and ye shall not break a bone in it,” signifies the truth of memory-knowledge, that this also must be sound; “all the assemblage of Israel shall perform it,” signifies that this law of order is for all who are in the good of truth and in the truth of good; “and when a sojourner shall sojourn with thee,” signifies those who have been instructed in the truth and good of the church, and have received them; “and performeth the passover to Jehovah,” signifies if he desires to be together with them; “every male of his shall be circumcised,” signifies that his truth must be cleansed from impure loves; “and then let him come near to perform it,” signifies that then he shall be with them; “and he shall be as a native of the land,” signifies that he shall be received as he who is in that truth and good, and has been purified from unclean loves; “and no uncircumcised person shall eat of it,” signifies that he who is in the loves of self and of the world cannot be together with them; “one law shall there be for the native, and for the sojourner that sojourneth in the midst of you,” signifies that he who on being instructed receives the truth and good of the church, and lives according to them, shall be as he who, being already instructed, is within the church, and lives a life in agreement with the precepts of faith and of charity. 7994 And Jehovah said unto Moses and Aaron. That this signifies information by means of truth Divine, is evident from the signification of “Jehovah said,” when the statutes of the church are treated of, as being information or instruction (see n. 7186, 7267, 7304, 7380, 7517, 7769, 7793, 7825); and from the representation of Moses and Aaron, as being truth Divine; Moses internal, and Aaron external (n. 7009, 7010, 7089, 7382). 7995 This is the statute of the passover. That this signifies the laws of order for those who are liberated from damnation and infestations, is evident from the signification of a “statute,” as being that which is from order (of which below); and from the signification of “the passover,” as being the presence of the Lord and liberation from damnation (see n. 7093e, 7867). As regards that which is of order, which is signified by “statute,” be it known that all the statutes commanded to the sons of Israel were laws of order in the external form, but those things which they represented and signified were laws of order in the internal form. Laws of order are truths which are from good; the complex of all the laws of order is the Divine truth proceeding from the Divine good of the Lord. From this it is evident that the Divine Itself of the Lord in heaven is order, the Divine good the essential of order, and the Divine truth its formal. 7996 No son of an alien shall eat of it. That this signifies that those who are not in truth and good are to be separated from them, is evident from the signification of “an alien,” as being those out of the church who do not acknowledge anything of the truth and good of faith, as was the case with the nations in the land of Canaan (see n. 2049, 2115), thus who are not in truth and good; and from the signification of “not eating of it,” as being to communicate and be conjoined with them, thus to be separated from them. In what now follows those are treated of who should eat the passover together, and those who should not. The supper of the passover represented the consociations of the good in heaven; and in the statutes which follow, it is declared who could be consociated and who could not. In general, feasts, both dinners and suppers, in ancient times were made within the church in order that they might be consociated and conjoined as to love, and that they might instruct one another in those things which are of love and faith, thus in the things of heaven (see n. 3596, 3832, 5161). Such at that time were the delights attending their banquets, and such was the end for the sake of which were their dinners and suppers. Thus the mind and the body also were nourished unanimously and correspondently; and from this they had health and long life, and from it they had intelligence and wisdom; and also from this they had communication with heaven, and some had open communication with angels. But as in course of time all internal things vanish away and pass into external ones, so also did the purposes of the feasts and banquets, which at this day are not for the sake of any spiritual conjunction, but for the sake of worldly conjunctions, namely, for the sake of gain, for the sake of the pursuit of honors, and for the sake of pleasures, from which there is nourishment of the body, but none of the mind. 7997 That the paschal supper represented the consociations of angels in the heavens in respect to goods and truths, see above (n. 7836, 7996); and because it represented these, it was ordained that not only every house by itself should then be together and eat, but also that no others should be consociated except those who represent the conjunction of love such as is that of the heavenly societies, and thus that the rest were to be separated. They who are to be separated were the aliens, for by them were signified those who are not in the good and truth of the church; also the lodgers and hirelings, because by these were represented those who from mere natural disposition, and those who for the sake of gain, did good and truth, and made a boast of them. Neither the latter nor the former can be consociated with the angels in the heavens; but when they are allowed to wander about, as is the case when they first come into the other life, before they undergo vastations of good and truth, then when they come toward any angelic society and feel the sphere of sanctity from the truth of the good of innocence which is signified by the blood of the paschal lamb (n. 7846, 7877), they cannot approach, but forthwith flee away because of fear and aversion. 7998 And every man’s servant. That this signifies a man who is still natural, is evident from the signification of “servant,” as being what is natural (see n. 3019, 3020, 3191, 3192, 3204, 3206, 3209, 5305), thus the natural man. The natural man is called a “servant” because it was made to minister to the spiritual man, and also to obey it, as a servant his lord. 7999 That is bought with silver. That this signifies who has any spiritual truth, is evident from the signification of “buying,” as being acquisition and appropriation (see n. 4397, 4487, 5374, 5397, 5406, 5410, 5426); and from the signification of “silver,” as being truth (n. 1551, 2954, 5658), here spiritual truth, because the servant that is bought is in the internal sense the natural man, and therefore the lord who buys is the spiritual man. How this is cannot be known unless it is known how the spiritual buys for itself-that is, acquires and appropriates-the natural. When man is being regenerated, his internal and external, that is, the spiritual and the natural, at first are at variance, for the spiritual wills what is of heaven, but the natural what is of the world. But the spiritual then continually inflows into the natural and brings it into agreement; this is effected by means of truth; and what the spiritual brings to itself in the natural is called “bought with silver,” that is, acquired and appropriated by means of truth. 8000 When thou hast circumcised him. That this signifies purification from unclean loves, is evident from the signification of “to be circumcised,” as being purification from the loves of self and of the world, thus from unclean loves (see n. 2039, 2056, 2632, 3412, 3413, 3462, 7045). 8001 Then shall he eat of it. That this signifies that he shall be with them, is evident from the signification of “eating,” that is, the paschal lamb, together with the rest, as being to communicate and be conjoined (see n. 2187, 5643). For as before said (n. 7836, 7850, 7996, 7997), the paschal supper represented the angelic consociations in respect to goods and truths; and by the statutes concerning aliens, servants, lodgers, hirelings, and sojourners, who are here treated of, is declared in the internal sense who could be consociated, and who could not. Hence it is that by “eating” is signified to be with them, or to be consociated; and by “not eating,” not to be with them, or to be separated. 8002 A lodger and a hired servant shall not eat of it. That this signifies that they who do what is good from mere natural disposition, and those who do it for the sake of their own advantage, are not to be with them, is evident from the signification of “a lodger,” as being those who do what is good from mere natural disposition (of which below); from the signification of “a hireling,” as being those who do what is good for the sake of their own advantage (of which also below); and from the signification of “not to eat of it,” as being not to be with them (of which just above, n. 8001). That a “lodger” denotes what is good from mere natural disposition, is because lodgers were those who came from other peoples, and were inhabitants, and dwelt with the Israelites and the Jews in one house; and “to dwell together” signifies to be together in good. But because, as before said, they were from peoples out of the church, the good which is signified is not the good of the church, but is a good not of the church. This good is called “natural good,” because it is hereditary from birth. Moreover, some have such good in consequence of ill health and feebleness. This good is meant by the good which they do who are signified by “lodgers.”[2] This good is utterly different from the good of the church, for by means of the good of the church conscience is formed in man, which is the plane into which the angels flow, and through which there is fellowship with them; whereas by natural good no plane for the angels can be formed. They who are in this good do good in the dark from blind instinct; not in the light of truth by virtue of influx from heaven; and therefore in the other life they are carried away, like chaff by the wind, by everyone, as much by an evil man as by a good one, and more by an evil one who knows how to join to reasonings something of affection and persuasion; nor can they then be withdrawn by the angels, for the angels operate through the truths and goods of faith, and flow into the plane which has been formed within the man from the truths and goods of faith. From all this it is evident that those who do what is good from mere natural disposition cannot be consociated with the angels (concerning them and their lot in the other life, see n. 3470, 3471, 3518, 4988, 4992, 5032, 6208, 7197).[3] That “lodgers” are those who do not stay in their own land or in their own house, but in a foreign land, is evident in the following passages:The land shall not be sold in perpetuity; for the land is Mine; but ye are sojourners and lodgers with Me (Lev. 25:23).Hear my prayer, O Jehovah, be not silent at my tear; for I am a sojourner with Thee, a lodger, as all my fathers were (Ps. 39:12).Abraham said unto the sons of Heth, I am a sojourner and a lodger with you; give me a possession of a sepulcher (Gen. 23:3-4).By a “sojourner” equally as by a “lodger,” is signified a comer and inhabitant from another land, but by a “sojourner” are signified those who were being instructed in the truths of the church and who received them; and by “lodgers” were signified those not instructed in the truths of the church, because they were not willing to receive them.[4] As regards “hirelings,” they were such as labored for hire, being servants, but not bought; that these were called “hirelings” see Lev. 19:13; 25:4-6; Deut. 24:14, 15. As “hirelings” were those who labored for hire, by them in the internal sense are meant those who do what is good for the sake of their own advantage in the world; and in a sense still more interior, those who do what is good for the sake of reward in the other life; thus who desire to merit by works.[5] They who do what is good merely for the sake of their own advantage in the world, cannot possibly be consociated with angels, because the end regarded by them is the world, that is, wealth and eminence; and not heaven, that is, the blessedness and happiness of souls. The end is what determines the actions, and gives them their quality. Concerning those who do what is good merely for the sake of their own advantage, the Lord thus speaks:I am the good Shepherd; the good Shepherd layeth down His life for the sheep. But he that is a hireling, and not a shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and deserteth the sheep, and fleeth, and the wolf seizeth them, and scattereth the sheep. But the hireling fleeth because he is a hireling (John 10:11-13).Egypt is a very beautiful heifer; destruction out of the north is come. Her hirelings are like calves of the fatting stall; for they also have turned back, they have fled away together, they did not stand, because the day of their destruction is come upon them (Jer. 46:20-21).[6] That lodgers and hirelings were not to be consociated in respect to holy things with those who were of the church, is evident from this:There shall no alien eat of the holy thing: a lodger of the priest, and a hireling, shall not eat of the holy thing (Lev. 22:10).And that from the sons of lodgers were to be bought servants who should serve forever, in the same:Of the nations that are round about you ye shall buy manservant and maidservant; and also of the sons of the lodgers that do sojourn with you, of these shall ye buy, and of their family that is with you, although they have brought forth in your land; and that they may be your possession, and that ye may hand them over for an inheritance to your sons after you, to inherit for a possession; ye shall rule over them forever (Lev. 25:44-46).By the “sons of the lodgers” are signified memory-knowledges which are from mere natural light; that spiritual truths shall rule over these is signified by “servants being bought of the sons of the lodgers for a perpetual possession.”[7] But they who do what is good for the sake of reward in the other life, who also are signified by “hirelings,” differ from those just now spoken of, in that they have as the end life and happiness in heaven. But as this end determines and converts their Divine worship from the Lord to themselves, and they consequently desire well to themselves alone, and to others only so far as these desire well to them, and accordingly the love of self is in every detail, and not the love of the neighbor, therefore they have no genuine charity. Neither can these be consociated with the angels, for the angels are utterly averse to both the name and the idea of reward or recompense. That benefits must be imparted without the end of reward, the Lord teaches in Luke:Love your enemies, and impart benefits, and lend, hoping for nothing again; then shall your reward be great, and ye shall be sons of the Most High (Luke 6:32-35; 14:12-14).(Concerning meritorious goods and their quality, see n. 1110, 1111, 1774, 1835, 1877, 2027, 2273, 2340, 2373, 2400, 3816, 4007, 4174, 4943, 6388-6390, 6392, 6393, 6478.)[8] That it is so often said by the Lord that they who do what is good shall “have their reward in heaven” (as in Matt. 5:11, 12; 6:1, 2, 16; 10:41, 42; 20:1-16; Mark 9:41; Luke 6:23, 35; 14:14; John 4:36) is because before he is regenerated a man cannot but think of reward; but it is otherwise when he has been regenerated; he is then indignant if anyone thinks that he benefits his neighbor for the sake of reward, for he feels delight and blessedness in imparting benefits, and not in recompense. (That in the internal sense “reward” denotes the delight of the affection of charity, see n. 3816, 3956, 6388, 6478.) 8003 In one house shall it be eaten. That this signifies the consociations of accordant goods that they may together make one good, is evident from the fact that the paschal supper represented the angelic consociations in heaven, and that each house of the sons of Israel represented a society in particular (see n. 7836, 7891, 7996, 7997). The angelic societies are all distinct from one another according to goods, and this generically, specifically, and particularly (see n. 3241, 4625). They are consociated who are in similar good. That these make one good, is because everyone arises not from one, but from many; for from many things that are various, but still accordant, there is produced a form which makes a one by harmony; in heaven by spiritual harmony, which is that of the goods of love (see n. 3241, 3267, 3744-3746, 3986, 4005, 4149, 5598, 7236, 7833, 7836). From all this it is evident that by “in one house shall it be eaten” are signified the consociations of accordant goods that they may together make one good. (That “to eat,” namely, the passover, denotes to be consociated, or to be with them, see above, n. 8001.) 8004 Thou shalt not bring out of the flesh abroad from the house. That this signifies that this good shall not be mixed together with the good of another, is evident from the signification of “to bring out abroad from the house” as being to give to another to eat, thus to mix with another good than that which belongs to the society; and from the signification of “flesh,” as being good (see n. 6968, 7850). For the societies in heaven are distinct according to the functions of all the members, viscera, and organs in the body (as has been shown at the close of many chapters). By means of correspondence, the function of each member, viscus, and organ bears relation to a peculiar good distinct from any other. From this it is evident that goods are manifold, and that in order that from them distinct forms may arise, which taken together may constitute the most perfect form of heaven, they are by no means to be mixed together; for if they were mixed together the distinction would be lost. This is signified by the command that they should not bring out of the flesh abroad from the house. 8005 And ye shall not break a bone in it. That this signifies the truth of memory-knowledge, that this must be sound, is evident from the signification of “bone,” as being the ultimate in which interior things terminate as in their base, that they may be supported and not spread asunder. Such an ultimate in spiritual things is memory-knowledge; for all spiritual truths and goods flow down according to order to lower things, and finally terminate in memory-knowledges, where they present themselves visibly to man. That “ye shall not break” denotes that it must be sound, is clear. Memory-knowledge is said to be sound when it admits into itself nothing but truths which agree with its good; for the memory-knowledge is the general receptacle. Moreover, memory-knowledges are like the bones in man; if these are not sound, or in their order, as when disjointed or distorted, the form of the body is thereby changed, and the actions in accordance therewith. The truths of memory-knowledge are doctrinal things. 8006 All the assemblage of Israel shall perform it. That this signifies that this law of order is for all who are in the good of truth and in the truth of good, is evident from the signification of “the assemblage of Israel,” as being all truths and goods in one complex (see n. 7830); thus those who are in the truth through which is good, and those who are in the good through which is truth (n. 7957), consequently those who are of the spiritual church. That all these were to perform the passover, was to represent the liberation of those of the spiritual church who had been detained in the lower earth until the Lord’s coming (n. 6854, 6914, 7091, 7849, 7932); their eating together in one house was to represent the angelic consociations in heaven (n. 7836, 7996, 7997); thus by the whole assemblage of Israel performing it was represented the whole heaven. At that time there was nowhere a church, but only the representative of a church, for which were taken the descendants of Abraham from Jacob. Communication with heaven, and through heaven with the Lord, was given by means of the representatives of the church. For this reason it was enjoined upon that nation to strictly observe all the statutes and all the laws, especially the statutes concerning the passover, insomuch that he who was clean and did not perform the passover was to be cut off (Num. 9:13). 8007 And when a sojourner shall sojourn with thee. That this signifies those who have been instructed in the truth and good of the church and have received them, is evident from the signification of a “sojourner,” as being those who were being instructed and were receiving the statutes and laws of the church (see n. 2025, 4444, 7908). It is said “when he shall sojourn with thee,” because by “sojourning” is signified to be instructed and to live (n. 1463, 3672). Thus by “sojourners sojourning with them” are signified not only those who were being instructed in the truth and good of the church and were receiving them, but also those who were living according to them. 8008 And performeth the passover to Jehovah. That this signifies if he desires to be together with them, is evident from the signification of “performing the passover to Jehovah,” that is, eating it, as being to be together with them (see n. 8001). 8009 Every male of his shall be circumcised. That this signifies that his truth must be cleansed from impure loves, is evident from the signification of “to be circumcised,” as being to be purified or cleansed from impure loves (see n. 2039, 2056, 2632, 3412, 3413, 4462, 7045); and from the signification of “male,” as being the truth of faith (n. 749, 2046, 4005, 7838). 8010 And then let him come near to perform it, signifies that then he shall be with them (as above, n. 8008). 8011 And he shall be as a native of the land. That this signifies that he shall be accepted just as is he who is in this truth and good, and has been purified from unclean loves, is evident from the signification of “a native of the land,” as being one who has been born within the church and is in its truth and good, consequently who has been purified from unclean loves. It is said “a native of the land,” because by “land” is signified the church (that “land” in the Word denotes the church, see n. 566, 662, 1066, 1067, 1262, 1413, 1607, 1733, 1850, 2117, 2118, 2571, 2928, 3355, 4447, 4535, 5577). That “land” denotes the church is because by “land” in the Word is meant the land of Canaan, and by “the land of Canaan” is signified the Lord’s kingdom and church (n. 1413, 1437, 1585, 1607, 1866, 3038, 3481, 3686, 3705, 4116, 4240, 4447, 4454, 4516, 4517, 5136, 5757, 6516). By every land named in the Word the angels do not understand the land, but the nation that was there, and along with the nation there is understood the quality of the nation in respect to its spirituality, that is, in respect to that which is of the church. That the idea of the quality of the nation occurs when its land is named, is known, for this is the case even with men, and more so with the angels, who think spiritually about every natural thing. 8012 And no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. That this signifies that he who is in the loves of self and of the world cannot be together with them, is evident from the signification of an “uncircumcised person,” as being one who is in the loves of self and of the world (see n. 2056, 3412, 3413, 7045); and from the signification of “eating of it,” namely, the passover, as being to be with them (of which above, n. 8001). 8013 One law shall there be for the native, and for the sojourner that sojourneth in the midst of you. That this signifies that he who on being instructed has received the truth and good of the church, and lives according to them, shall be as he who being already instructed is within the church, and lives a life in agreement with the precepts of faith and of charity, is evident from the signification of “one law shall there be,” as being a similar right, thus that the one shall be as the other; and from the signification of “the native,” as being one who has been born within the church, and is in its truth and good as to doctrine and as to life (as just above, n. 8011); and from the signification of “the sojourner that sojourneth in the midst of you,” as being one who is being instructed in the truth and good of the church and receives them and lives according to them (of which also above, n. 8007).[2] It is said “in agreement with the precepts of faith and of charity,” on account of the difference; for the life before regeneration is according to the precepts of faith, but after regeneration it is according to the precepts of charity. Before regeneration no one knows from affection what charity is, but only from doctrine; and the man then lives according to the precepts of doctrine, which are called precepts of faith; but after regeneration he knows from affection what charity is, for he then loves his neighbor, and from the heart wills good to him, and he then lives according to a law that is written on him, for he acts from the affection of charity. This state is utterly different from the former state. They who are in the first state are in obscurity in respect to the truths and goods of faith, but they who are in the latter state are relatively in clearness. These see truths and confirm them from enlightenment, while the former do not see truths and confirm them from enlightenment; but from persuasion that the teachings of the church are truths. And because they do not see them from enlightenment, they can confirm falsities equally with truths, and after these have been confirmed, they see them precisely as truths. From all this it can be seen what is meant by living according to the precepts of faith, and what by living according to the precepts of charity.[3] As regards sojourners, it is several times commanded in the Word that no distinction should be made between a native of the land and a sojourner sojourning with them, for the reason that the Gentiles, from whom the sojourners came, are received into heaven equally as well as they who are within the church, when after being instructed they have received the truths of faith. (Of the Gentiles in the other life, see n. 932, 1032, 1059, 2049, 2284, 2589-2604, 2861, 2863, 3263, 4190, 4197.) Hence it was commanded that “as with the native, so with the sojourner;” as in the following passages:And if a sojourner shall sojourn with you, who shall make a fire-offering of an odor of rest to Jehovah; as ye do, so shall he do. As regards the assembly, there is one statute for you, and for the sojourner that sojourneth, a statute of eternity for your generations; as ye are, so is the sojourner before Jehovah. One law and one judgment shall be for you, and for the sojourner that sojourneth with you (Num. 15:14-16).As is the native of you, shall be to you the sojourner that sojourneth with you (Lev. 19:34).One judgment shall be for you; as for the sojourner, so shall it be for the native (Lev. 24:22).When a sojourner shall sojourn with you he shall perform the passover to Jehovah; according to the statute of the passover, and according to the statutes thereof, so shall he do; one statute shall be for you; as for the sojourner, so for the native (Num. 9:14). 8014 Verses 50, 51. And all the sons of Israel did as Jehovah commanded Moses and Aaron, so did they. And it was in this same day that Jehovah led forth the sons of Israel out of the land of Egypt by their armies. “And all the sons of Israel did as Jehovah commanded Moses and Aaron,” signifies the performing of obedience according to truth Divine; “so did they,” signifies performance from the will; “and it was in this same day,” signifies a state of the presence of the Lord; “that Jehovah led forth the sons of Israel out of the land of Egypt,” signifies that the Lord liberated from damnation those who were in the good of truth and the truth of good; “by their armies,” signifies these distinct according to the quality of good from truth. 8015 And all the sons of Israel did as Jehovah commanded Moses and Aaron. That this signifies the performing of obedience according to truth Divine, is evident from what was said above (n. 7944), where similar words occur. 8016 So did they. That this signifies performance from the will, is evident from the signification of “doing,” when the word is repeated, as being performance from the will (as above, n. 7945). 8017 And it was in this same day. That this signifies a state of the presence of the Lord, is evident from the signification of “day,” as being time and state (see n. 23, 487, 488, 493, 893, 2788, 3462, 3785, 4850, 7680). That it is a state of the presence of the Lord, is because it was the day of the passover, and by the “passover” is signified the presence of the Lord, and the liberation of those who are of the spiritual church from spiritual captivity and from damnation (n. 7867). That there was liberation then, is signified by what follows in this verse, namely, that “on that day Jehovah led forth the sons of Israel out of the land of Egypt by their armies.” That this was on the morrow after the passover, is evident from Moses:They journeyed from Egypt on the fifteenth day of the first month, on the morrow after the passover in the eyes of all the Egyptians, while the Egyptians were burying their firstborn that were slain (Num. 33:1-4).(That the presence of the Lord liberates from damnation those who are in good, and brings those who are in evil into damnation, see n. 7926, 7989.) 8018 That Jehovah led forth the sons of Israel out of the land of Egypt. That this signifies that the Lord liberated from damnation those who were in the good of truth and in the truth of good, is evident from the signification of “to lead forth,” as being to liberate; and from the representation of the sons of Israel, as being those who are of the spiritual church, or what is the same, who are in the good of truth and the truth of good (of which above, see n. 7957, 8006); and from the signification of “the land of Egypt,” as being damnation. That “the land of Egypt” here denotes damnation, is because by the state of the Egyptians is now signified damnation (n. 7766, 7778). (That the Lord liberated from damnation those who were of the spiritual church, that is, who were in the good of truth and the truth of good, see n. 6854, 6914, 7091, 7828, 7932.)[2] Their liberation by the Lord when He rose again is signified by the descent of the Lord to the lower regions, and was clearly shown by the awakening of the dead out of the tombs, of which in Matthew:And the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the saints that were sleeping were raised; and going forth out of the tombs after His resurrection they entered into the holy city and appeared to many (Matt. 27:52-53);their going forth out of the tombs, and entering into the holy city, and also their appearing, were for a testification that they, who had hitherto been detained in spiritual captivity, had been liberated by the Lord, and would be introduced into heaven. In the internal sense heaven is signified by “the holy city;” and therefore it is called “the holy city,” when yet it was not holy but profane, seeing that its people had so cruelly treated the Lord Himself, who was represented in all the rituals of their church, and described in the Word that was among them; and thus who had been the God of their church.[3] The like is signified by this passage in Daniel:At that time thy people shall be delivered, everyone that shall be found written in the book. And then many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, these to eternal life, but the rest to shame and everlasting disgrace (Dan. 12:1-2).And also by this in Ezekiel:Prophesy and say, Thus said the Lord Jehovih, Behold I will open your sepulchers, and cause you to come up out of your sepulchers, O My people; and I will bring you upon the land of Israel, that ye may know that I am Jehovah, when I shall open your sepulchers, and shall cause you to come up out of your sepulchers, O My people, and I shall put My spirit in you, that ye may live, and I shall place you upon your land, that ye may know that I Jehovah have spoken it, and performed it, said Jehovah (Ezek. 37:12-14);where by “the land of Israel” or of Canaan is meant heaven (n. 8011). By these words in the prophet is described the new creation or generation of man, and also the vivification by the Lord of those who are of the spiritual church. 8019 By their armies. That this signifies these distinct according to the quality of good from truth, is evident from the signification of “armies,” as being goods and truths (of which above, n. 7988); “by their armies” signifies that they who are represented by the sons of Israel were made distinct according to the quality of good from truth. (That all in the other life are distinct and conjoined according to goods, see n. 7833, 7836, 8003.) It is said “according to the quality of good from truth,” because all good has its quality from truth, and is thereby varied (n. 3804, 4149, 5345, 5355, 6916). 8020 From the statutes and laws concerning the eating of the paschal lamb, which are treated of in this chapter, it is clearly evident that there are heavenly secrets contained and hidden in every detail, and that without knowledge from the internal sense nothing is known but a mere ritual in an external form, and nothing heavenly, still less Divine. As for instance, why the paschal animal was to be a lamb or a kid; why the animal was to be a male, and a son of a year; why it was to be killed on the fourteenth day of the month; why its blood was to be sprinkled upon the posts and the lintel; why it was to be eaten roasted with fire, with unleavened bread upon bitter herbs, and not raw or boiled in water; why it was to be roasted with its head upon its legs and upon its midst; why they were not to leave anything of it until the morning, and why that which was left was to be burned with fire; why they were to eat unleavened bread seven days, and why whosoever ate leavened bread was to be cut off; why an alien, a lodger, and a hireling were not to eat of it, but a man’s servant that is bought with silver, and a sojourner, if they were circumcised; why it was to be eaten in one house, and none of the flesh taken out of doors; why a bone was not to be broken in it. What these and very many other particulars involve, and why they were commanded, would be utterly unknown, unless the laws of order in the spiritual world to which they correspond, were known, and unless it were known from the internal sense what each detail signifies in that world, that is, in heaven; and especially unless it were believed that in all things there is something spiritual. If there were not something spiritual in the whole and in each detail, the angels who are with man when he reads the Word would comprehend but little, indeed scarcely anything, from the Word; for the angels comprehend spiritually all things that have been described in the Word in a natural manner. 8021ON THE SPIRITS AND INHABITANTS OF THE PLANET JUPITER, CONTINUED.One of those spirits of Jupiter who strike terror by their coming, as already described, applied himself to my left side beneath the elbow, and spoke from there; but his speech was harsh, nor were the words quite discrete and separate from one another, insomuch that I was obliged to wait long before I could gather the sense; and while he was speaking he also interjected something of terror. He said that so it is done on their earth, and that they are sent in advance to a man, before their angels come to him, and in this manner they prepare him. He admonished me also to receive them well when they came. But it was given me to answer that this is not my affair; but that with me all are received just as they themselves are. 8022 Afterward the angels of that earth came, and it was given me to perceive from their speech with me that they are utterly different from the angels of our earth; for their speech was not effected by means of words, but by means of ideas which diffused themselves through my interiors on all sides, and from there had also an influx into the face, so that the face concurred to every particular; beginning from the lips, and proceeding toward the circumference on all sides. The ideas which were in the stead of words were discrete, but in a slight degree. They said that so do they speak with their own people on their earth; and that there also the speech is of the face, beginning from the lips. 8023 Afterward they spoke with me by means of ideas still less discrete, insomuch that scarcely any interval was perceivable; it was in my perception like the meaning of words with those who attend only to the meaning abstractedly from the words. This speech was more intelligible to me than the former, and was also more full. It flowed into the face in like manner as the former, but the influx was more continuous, in accordance with the nature of the speech. It did not, however, begin from the lips, like the former, but from the eyes. They said that so also do they speak with their own people on their earth; but with those there who enjoy a more interior sense and discernment than the rest. 8024 Afterward they spoke in a manner still more continuous and full; and then the face could not concur by a suitable movement; but there was felt an influx into the brain, and this was then acted upon in a similar manner. 8025 Lastly they spoke in such a way that their discourse fell only into the interior understanding; its fluency was like that of a thin aura. I perceived the influx itself, but not distinctly the particulars. They said that there are men of their earth also with whom they speak in this manner, and that they are those who after death are immediately carried up into heaven. 8026 These kinds of speech are circumstanced like fluids; the first kind is like fluent water; the second is like water more attenuated; the third is relatively like the atmosphere; and the fourth is like a thin aura. 8027 The spirit above mentioned, who was on the left side, sometimes interrupted the conversation, admonishing me especially to deal discreetly with his angels; for there were spirits from our earth who occasioned such things as excited displeasure. He also said that he did not understand what the angels spoke; but that he did afterward when he removed to my left ear. His speech then was not harsh as before, but like that of other spirits. 8028 From this it could be seen how the case is with the order in heaven, and from this in the world; namely that when angels are about to come, a spirit is sent before to prepare the way, and that he excites fear, and gives admonition to receive the angels courteously; and that he interrupts; also that at first he does not understand what the angels speak, but afterward when he has been reduced to a better state he understands; in a word, that he is continually at hand, and prepares the lower mind, and endeavors to avert things unworthy. In regard to this there occurred to me a thought about John the Baptist, that it was according to the order of heaven for him to be sent before and announce the coming of the Lord, and that he should prepare the way that He might be worthily received, according to what is written in Matt. 3:3; Luke 1:17; 3:4; John 1:23. 8029 From what has already been occasionally related about the state of man after death, it is evident that there are few who at once enter heaven when they come into the other life; but that they stay for some time beneath heaven, in order that the things belonging to earthly and bodily loves, which they have brought with them from the world, may be removed, and they may thus be prepared to be capable of being in society with the angels. The case is similar with the men of all the earths, namely, that after their decease they are at first beneath heaven among spirits; and afterward, when they are prepared, they become angels. When the spirits of that earth were becoming angels it was given me to see that there appeared bright horses as of fire, by which they were carried up, like Elijah. Bright horses as of fire signify an enlightened understanding (that “horses” in the Word signify what is of the understanding, see n. 2760-2762, 3217, 5321, 6125, 6534); and the “horses of fire and chariots of fire” which carried away Elijah, signify the understanding of the Word as to its interiors (n. 2762). 8030 This angelic heaven to which they are carried away is the first heaven, or the last of the three. This heaven appears to the right from their earth, and is quite separate from the first or lowest heaven of the angels who are from our earth. They who are in this heaven appear clothed in azure dotted with little golden stars; for they believe this color to be the veriest heavenly color. When they are in the world, and contemplate the starry heaven, they call it the abode of the angels; and for this reason the azure color is loved by them. 8031 The spirits of that earth are utterly unwilling to be in fellowship with the spirits of our earth, because they differ in disposition and manners; for they say that the spirits of our earth are cunning, and are ingenious in plotting evils, and that they know and think little about what is good; also that they do not, as they do, acknowledge the one only Lord. Moreover, the spirits of the earth Jupiter are much wiser than the spirits of our earth, of whom they also say that they speak much and think little, and thus that they cannot interiorly perceive many things, and not even what good is. From this they conclude that the men of our earth are external men. 8032 The subject of the spirits and inhabitants of the planet Jupiter will be continued at the end of the following chapter.

Ao entrar no elevador para fazer entrevistas sobre o filme “Sonhos de Trem” (Netflix), a primeira coisa que ouvi de um jornalista americano foi: “Qualquer frame do filme dá um quadro maravilhoso”. Ele não sabia que o diretor de fotografia era brasileiro, mas sem perceber, acabou me dando a manchete e resumiu exatamente o que tantos profissionais têm repetido sobre o trabalho de Adolpho Veloso.  Cleide Klock, correspondente da RFI em Los Angeles O nome de Veloso circula nas principais publicações de Hollywood, entre os favoritos na corrida ao Oscar na categoria de Melhor Fotografia. Nesta última semana, ele já apareceu na shortlist do Critics' Choice Awards, premiação da principal associação de críticos de cinema dos Estados Unidos. Veloso, que mora em Portugal e carrega o Brasil na memória e no olhar, veio a Hollywood para participar do lançamento do filme e das campanhas de premiações. E parece ainda se surpreender com essa repercussão. “É muito louco. Você nunca imagina, quando está filmando, que isso vai acontecer. Não é uma coisa que faz muito sentido, ao mesmo tempo, é tão surreal que eu prefiro nem pensar tanto. E é um ano extremamente difícil, com muito filme bom, acho que é um dos melhores anos do cinema nos últimos tempos”, contou à RFI. Ele confessa que, como muitos artistas, vive crises profundas durante o processo. “É incrível ter esse reconhecimento, principalmente pela quantidade de crises que a gente tem filmando, que você acha que nunca mais vai filmar na vida. A primeira vez que assisti esse filme no cinema, pensei: ‘Meu Deus, isso está horrível, nunca mais vou conseguir trabalho'. E ver essa reação agora, que é o completo oposto, dá forças para seguir”. Memórias e naturalismo Em “Sonhos de Trem”, dirigido por Clint Bentley e inspirado na novela de Denis Johnson, acompanhamos Robert Grainier (Joel Edgerton), um lenhador do início do século XX, que vive longos períodos longe da família. A atmosfera é de recordações borradas, sensações e silêncios, algo que nasceu de forma muito consciente entre Clint e Adolpho. “A gente queria muito que, ao assistir ao filme, parecesse que você estivesse vendo as memórias de alguém, quase como se encontrasse uma caixa com fotos antigas e tentasse entender a vida daquela pessoa, às vezes meio fora de ordem, e você tenta entender quem foi aquela pessoa por aquelas fotos”, explica. Um brasileiro nos anos 1920 Filmado inteiramente no estado de Washington em apenas 29 dias, um feito raro para um longa de época, o projeto exigiu uma maratona por florestas intocadas, vales, zonas devastadas e cenários naturais extremos. A natureza no filme é praticamente uma personagem. “Num filme de época, às vezes é difícil para quem o assiste se conectar, porque tudo é tão diferente. Então queríamos trazer mais realidade, mais conexão. Filmamos só com luz natural e uma câmera bem orgânica, como se você estivesse lembrando de algo que viveu”. Veloso, que nasceu em São Paulo e hoje vive em Portugal, encontrou na história de Grainier uma identificação imediata. “Quando o diretor me mandou o roteiro, pensei: essa vida é basicamente a minha. Esse cara que fica meses longe de casa, trabalhando com gente que talvez nunca mais vai ver… é assim para quem faz cinema. Voltar para casa sempre é estranho, leva dias para sentir que você pertence de novo. Tem as questões de perda, de imigração, da gente ser estrangeiro numa terra diferente, e isso tem consequências”. Olhar brasileiro encontra caminho em Hollywood A trajetória até Hollywood foi, como ele mesmo diz, “aos poucos”. Começou filmando no Brasil, trabalhou com Heitor Dhalia, assinou filmes e documentários, entre eles “On Yoga”, que chamou a atenção de Clint Bentley. Quando Bentley preparava “Jockey” (2021), buscava justamente alguém que transitasse entre ficção e documentários. Encontrou Veloso e o contactou por e-mail. Anos depois, “Sonhos de Trem” se tornaria o segundo filme da dupla. Além de estar nas previsões de Melhor Fotografia para o Oscar, a produção, que já está disponível na Netflix, aparece com possíveis indicações de Melhor Filme, Melhor Ator (possivelmente para Joel Edgerton) e Melhor Roteiro Adaptado. O Brasil que sempre volta Quando lhe pergunto se leva algo do Brasil para seus filmes, a resposta vem quase antes da pergunta terminar: “O nosso jeitinho.” Não no sentido estereotipado, mas na criatividade diante do impossível, no drible às burocracias rígidas de sets americanos. “Aqui tudo é muito engessado e a gente não está acostumado com isso. Aqui, você tem uma ideia e já ouve um não: isso custa tanto, precisa disso, daquilo. E às vezes não precisa de tudo isso. Digo, e se a gente só fizer assim? E funciona.” Reconhecimento Conto a ele que vários jornalistas comentaram comigo espontaneamente sobre a fotografia do filme, sem saber que ele era brasileiro. Veloso abre um sorriso tímido, um pouco surpreso, um pouco orgulhoso. É o tipo de reconhecimento que o Brasil inteiro deveria ouvir. E talvez ouça, quem sabe, no palco do Oscar.

Ao entrar no elevador para fazer entrevistas sobre o filme “Sonhos de Trem” (Netflix), a primeira coisa que ouvi de um jornalista americano foi: “Qualquer frame do filme dá um quadro maravilhoso”. Ele não sabia que o diretor de fotografia era brasileiro, mas sem perceber, acabou me dando a manchete e resumiu exatamente o que tantos profissionais têm repetido sobre o trabalho de Adolpho Veloso.  Cleide Klock, correspondente da RFI em Los Angeles O nome de Veloso circula nas principais publicações de Hollywood, entre os favoritos na corrida ao Oscar na categoria de Melhor Fotografia. Nesta última semana, ele já apareceu na shortlist do Critics' Choice Awards, premiação da principal associação de críticos de cinema dos Estados Unidos. Veloso, que mora em Portugal e carrega o Brasil na memória e no olhar, veio a Hollywood para participar do lançamento do filme e das campanhas de premiações. E parece ainda se surpreender com essa repercussão. “É muito louco. Você nunca imagina, quando está filmando, que isso vai acontecer. Não é uma coisa que faz muito sentido, ao mesmo tempo, é tão surreal que eu prefiro nem pensar tanto. E é um ano extremamente difícil, com muito filme bom, acho que é um dos melhores anos do cinema nos últimos tempos”, contou à RFI. Ele confessa que, como muitos artistas, vive crises profundas durante o processo. “É incrível ter esse reconhecimento, principalmente pela quantidade de crises que a gente tem filmando, que você acha que nunca mais vai filmar na vida. A primeira vez que assisti esse filme no cinema, pensei: ‘Meu Deus, isso está horrível, nunca mais vou conseguir trabalho'. E ver essa reação agora, que é o completo oposto, dá forças para seguir”. Memórias e naturalismo Em “Sonhos de Trem”, dirigido por Clint Bentley e inspirado na novela de Denis Johnson, acompanhamos Robert Grainier (Joel Edgerton), um lenhador do início do século XX, que vive longos períodos longe da família. A atmosfera é de recordações borradas, sensações e silêncios, algo que nasceu de forma muito consciente entre Clint e Adolpho. “A gente queria muito que, ao assistir ao filme, parecesse que você estivesse vendo as memórias de alguém, quase como se encontrasse uma caixa com fotos antigas e tentasse entender a vida daquela pessoa, às vezes meio fora de ordem, e você tenta entender quem foi aquela pessoa por aquelas fotos”, explica. Um brasileiro nos anos 1920 Filmado inteiramente no estado de Washington em apenas 29 dias, um feito raro para um longa de época, o projeto exigiu uma maratona por florestas intocadas, vales, zonas devastadas e cenários naturais extremos. A natureza no filme é praticamente uma personagem. “Num filme de época, às vezes é difícil para quem o assiste se conectar, porque tudo é tão diferente. Então queríamos trazer mais realidade, mais conexão. Filmamos só com luz natural e uma câmera bem orgânica, como se você estivesse lembrando de algo que viveu”. Veloso, que nasceu em São Paulo e hoje vive em Portugal, encontrou na história de Grainier uma identificação imediata. “Quando o diretor me mandou o roteiro, pensei: essa vida é basicamente a minha. Esse cara que fica meses longe de casa, trabalhando com gente que talvez nunca mais vai ver… é assim para quem faz cinema. Voltar para casa sempre é estranho, leva dias para sentir que você pertence de novo. Tem as questões de perda, de imigração, da gente ser estrangeiro numa terra diferente, e isso tem consequências”. Olhar brasileiro encontra caminho em Hollywood A trajetória até Hollywood foi, como ele mesmo diz, “aos poucos”. Começou filmando no Brasil, trabalhou com Heitor Dhalia, assinou filmes e documentários, entre eles “On Yoga”, que chamou a atenção de Clint Bentley. Quando Bentley preparava “Jockey” (2021), buscava justamente alguém que transitasse entre ficção e documentários. Encontrou Veloso e o contactou por e-mail. Anos depois, “Sonhos de Trem” se tornaria o segundo filme da dupla. Além de estar nas previsões de Melhor Fotografia para o Oscar, a produção, que já está disponível na Netflix, aparece com possíveis indicações de Melhor Filme, Melhor Ator (possivelmente para Joel Edgerton) e Melhor Roteiro Adaptado. O Brasil que sempre volta Quando lhe pergunto se leva algo do Brasil para seus filmes, a resposta vem quase antes da pergunta terminar: “O nosso jeitinho.” Não no sentido estereotipado, mas na criatividade diante do impossível, no drible às burocracias rígidas de sets americanos. “Aqui tudo é muito engessado e a gente não está acostumado com isso. Aqui, você tem uma ideia e já ouve um não: isso custa tanto, precisa disso, daquilo. E às vezes não precisa de tudo isso. Digo, e se a gente só fizer assim? E funciona.” Reconhecimento Conto a ele que vários jornalistas comentaram comigo espontaneamente sobre a fotografia do filme, sem saber que ele era brasileiro. Veloso abre um sorriso tímido, um pouco surpreso, um pouco orgulhoso. É o tipo de reconhecimento que o Brasil inteiro deveria ouvir. E talvez ouça, quem sabe, no palco do Oscar.

Some of the tribes want to stay east of the Jordan. Moses sets up Cities of Refuge for them. God tells them to wipe out the pagan inhabitants of the land and gives them boundaries. Numbers 32:1-30, 31-42. Deuteronomy 4:41-43. Num 33:50-54, 25:17-19, 34;1-12,29, 35:1-8. #everydaychristians

Aos 8 anos, Matias, o filho que foi diagnosticado com autismo, chamou-o de pai pela primeira vez. Uma experiência que viria a marcar o cantor angolano para a vida. Matias Damásio compartilhou como foi crescer durante a guerra civil, ter de enfrentar a pobreza extrema e a violência. Aos 12 anos, foi vítima de abuso sexual. Lidou com esse trauma sozinho, sem ajuda psicológica, e esse trauma viria a afetar as suas relações amorosas futuras, confessa. Abordou a perda de um irmão por falta de assistência médica e como isso quase o fez desistir. “Num contexto de pobreza dá-se valor à vida, às coisas pequenas, como ter almoço, ter jantar, poder beber um copo de água, poder estar vivo, poder dar abraços”, acrescenta. Matias reflete ainda sobre a sua trajetória artística, os sacrifícios pessoais, a saudade, e os sonhos que o motivam, destacando o papel da música como força transformadora. Eis a história de vida de Matias Damásio, no dia em que sobe ao Meo Arena para um grande concerto. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

TEMPO DE REFLETIR 01598 – 29 de novembro de 2025 Efésios 3:6 – A saber, que os gentios são coerdeiros, membros do mesmo corpo e coparticipantes da promessa em Cristo Jesus por meio do evangelho. O Novo Testamento nunca se refere àqueles que se unem à igreja como “membros”, no sentido em que a palavra é utilizada hoje. Somos “membros” do corpo de Cristo, em sentido orgânico, mas não como “membros” em termos de “afiliados”, participantes de uma agremiação ou de um tipo de clube. O termo membro, no sentido bíblico, expressa a ideia de unidade, respeito, cooperação e solidariedade. Você já observou que em um corpo saudável os membros nunca estão em luta interna ou em competição? Imagine: os dedos dos pés passam a maior parte da vida apertados, sob pressão e peso, em uma atmosfera menos que recomendável, sendo vistos apenas por poucas pessoas. Mas nunca ouvimos dizer de artelhos inconformados que quisessem ser joelho ou nariz. Você pode imaginar por que a igreja, às vezes, é fraca, perdendo sangue em lutas internas, “mordidas” e ataques de uns aos outros? Num corpo, os membros são mais que mero ajuntamento de partes. Cada parte vive para a preservação da outra. Já pensou se um pé fosse amputado porque pisou no outro? E se os dentes fossem arrancados porque morderam a língua? Ao contrário disso, eles pertencem a uma unidade. A língua, embora tenha o poder da fala, não diz: “Vamos nos livrar desses dentes”. Imagine se alguns membros se aliassem contra o resto do corpo, como às vezes acontece na igreja. Dentro do “clube maior”, com frequência encontramos a existência de “clubinhos” e “panelinhas”, afirmando: “Eu sou de Pedro, eu sou de Paulo, eu sou de Apolo”, ou menos “sou melhor que todos, pois eu sou de Cristo”, em pretensa superioridade espiritual. Muitos estão satisfeitos pensando na igreja como uma agremiação, com algumas regras fixas, em que os “afiliados” devem assistir a algumas reuniões, fazer contribuições periódicas e viver “mais ou menos” de acordo com as normas do clube. Jesus eliminou essa hipótese, referindo-Se a Seus seguidores não como “membros”, mas como discípulos dEle (Mt 10:24,25; Jo 8:31; 13:35, etc.). Assim, os discípulos de Cristo são “membros” apenas quando isso é entendido em termos bíblicos. Unidos organicamente ao corpo, parte uns dos outros, sob a autoridade de Cristo, que é a cabeça da igreja (Ef 1:22,23). Reflita sobre isso no dia de hoje e ore comigo agora: Pai, que o Teu amor e a Tua graça resultem em unidade e cooperação entre Teu povo. Que sejamos Teus fiéis discípulos em todas as ocasiões. Em nome de Jesus, amém! Saiba como receber as mensagens diárias do Tempo de Refletir: -> No celular, instale o aplicativo MANAH. -> Para ver/ouvir no YouTube, inscreva-se neste Canal: youtube.com/AmiltonMenezes7 -> Tenha os nossos aplicativos em seu celular: https://www.wgospel.com/aplicativos -> Para receber pelo WhatsApp, adicione 41 99893-2056 e mande um recadinho pedindo os áudios. -> Participe do nosso canal no TELEGRAM: TELEGRAM AMILTON MENEZES . -> Participe do nosso canal no WhatsApp: WHATSAPP CHANNEL Amilton Menezes . -> Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amiltonmenezes7/ -> Threads: https://www.threads.net/@amiltonmenezes7 -> X (Antigo Twitter): https://x.com/AmiltonMenezes -> Facebook: facebook.com/AmiltonMenezes

Mercredi 15 Octobre 2025Azzur – Lancement de la Revue en présence de Solena LEFEUVRE et Camille BUONANNOREVUEAZZUR, le nouveau magazine littéraire et graphique qui raconte le quotidien de l'Europe. Numéro après numéro, AZZUR explore les terrains culturels où se jouent l'intime et l'insolite des vies européennes. À contre-courant des discours de rejet et de peur qui traversent le continent, le magazine met en perspective les expériences et les enjeux de société pour devenir le miroir de ce que nous vivons. Raconter, discuter, questionner l'instant présent pour tisser des ponts entre les générations.

Great eclectic mix of tunes on this episode of Noise. PLUS - a NOISE exclusive! Hear the new NUM song "Submerged" from the upcoming album "Seas Coming for Me" - out on November 29th. Come to the album release concert at cSpace Marda Loop on the 29th to get your copy of the physical album!Playlist: Puppet Wipes - Music Is A PlagueSH!TOMATO - OOEYGEODUCKNUM - Submergedclaire rousay - conditional loveBrother Dragon, featuring SAD GODS - in eating bouldersWay Ahead Trio - Six O'Clock Window WiperTim Brady - For Electric Guitar: Section 1Richard Carr - Fulton Street SundayAlex Fournier - Singing, Dancing and Other Embarrasing Things to Do on the SidewalkSAINERINE - Purity and ObedienceBITWASHERE - Effects Of Drugs And It's Effects On Memory Loss And Cognitive FunctionOneohtrix Point Never - Fear of SymmetryMark Molnar - pallida Mors- Disquiet

Podcast de l'émission radio RIG 90.7 du mercredi 26 novembre "Johnny de A à Z" n°591 Nos chansons préférées de JohnnyThibaut Geffrotin nous présente son nouveau livre sur Johnny Hallyday "Nos chansons préférées de Johnny" chez Talent Editions361 personnalités et fans de Johnny classent les 1064 chansons du répertoire de Johnny Hallyday...Découvrez les 15 chansons les plus plébiscitées de Johnny... setlist :Oh ma jolie Sarah / Taratata 2011 - 3 mai 2011Retiens La Nuit / Salut Les CopainsVivre Pour Le Meilleur / Sang Pour SangAllumer le feu / Tour Eiffel filage 8 juin 2000Sang Pour Sang / Sang Pour SangJ'Ai Oublié De Vivre / Flashback TourLe pénitencier / St Flour 21 août 96Gabrielle / Johnny Live 81Diego libre ans sa tête / On Stage 2012Requiem pour un fou / Numéro un Johnny Hallyday 11 juin 1977Je Te Promets / Bercy 90La Musique Que J'aime / InsolitudesQuelque chose de Tennessee - avec Michel Berger / Champs Elysées 1er juin 85Que Je T'Aime / Cadet Rousselle 22 février 73L'envie / Flashback Tour

Chaque jour, en quelques minutes, un résumé de l'actualité culturelle. Rapide, facile, accessible.Notre compte InstagramDES LIENS POUR EN SAVOIR PLUSChanson I Run TikTok : Complex, Billboard, India TimesDisneyland Paris : Le Parisien, Le Figaro, Le MondeMaroon 5 - Chambord : Château de Chambord, HuffPost, France InfoScarlett Johansson - L'Exorciste : Variety, Numéro Magazine, Vogue FranceSuperman No.1 enchères : Le Figaro, BFMTV, KonbiniSacem cérémonies Grands Prix : France Bleu, France InfoÉcriture : Eden AyachIncarnation : Blanche Vathonne Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

São números assustadores: 44% dos projectos de investimento esperam decisões de serviços públicos há mais de 2 anos. Há 1,3 mil milhões bloqueados. Num país que não cresce o Estado não ajuda, desajudaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Num debate picado do início ao fim – e que terminou para lá da hora –, André Ventura e Luís Marques Mendes, à mesma mesa, trocaram acusações que foram do “xerife da República” à “marioneta de Luís Montenegro”. Pelo meio, falou-se do 25 de Abril versus 25 de Novembro, de justiça e corrupção, de diplomacia e sentido de Estado. Num quase vale tudo, até o BES e o ex-deputado Miguel Arruda foram armas de arremesso.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Há criadores que operam dentro das fronteiras técnicas do seu ofício. E há outros que as redesenham. Manuel Pureza pertence à segunda categoria — a dos artistas que não apenas produzem obras, mas insinuam uma forma diferente de olhar para o mundo. Ao longo da última década, Pureza foi aperfeiçoando um dialeto visual singular: um equilíbrio improvável entre humor e melancolia, entre disciplina e improviso, entre ironia e empatia. Cresceu no ritmo acelerado das novelas, onde se aprende a filmar com pressão, velocidade e um olho permanentemente aberto para a fragilidade humana. Dali trouxe algo raro: um olhar que recusa o cinismo fácil e que insiste que até o ridículo tem dignidade. Na televisão e no cinema, a sua assinatura tornou-se evidente. Ele filma personagens como quem observa amigos de infância. Filma o quotidiano com a delicadeza de quem sabe que ali mora metade das grandes histórias. Filma o absurdo com a ternura de quem reconhece, nesse absurdo, o lado mais honesto do país que habita. Um humor que pensa Pureza não usa humor para fugir — usa humor para iluminar. Em “Pôr do Sol”, o fenómeno que se transformou num caso sério de análise cultural, a comédia deixou de ser apenas entretenimento. Tornou-se catarse colectiva. Portugal riu-se de si próprio com uma frontalidade rara, quase terapêutica. Não era paródia para diminuir; era paródia para pertencer. “O ridículo não é destrutivo”, explica Pureza. “É libertador.” Essa frase, que poderia ser um manifesto, resume bem o seu trabalho: ele leva o humor a sério. Independentemente do género — seja melodrama acelerado ou ficção introspectiva — há sempre, no seu olhar, a ideia de que rir pode ser um acto de lucidez. Num país onde o comentário público tantas vezes se esconde atrás da ironia amarga, Pureza faz o contrário: usa a ironia para abrir espaço, não para o fechar. A ética do olhar Filmar alguém é um exercício de confiança. Pureza opera com essa consciência. Não acredita em neutralidade — acredita em honestidade. Assume que cada plano é uma escolha e que cada escolha implica responsabilidade. Entre atores, essa postura cria um ambiente invulgar: segurança suficiente para arriscar, liberdade suficiente para falhar, humanidade suficiente para recomeçar. Num set regido pelo seu método, a escuta é tão importante quanto a técnica. E talvez por isso os seus actores falem de “estar em casa”, mesmo quando as cenas são emocionalmente densas. A câmara de Pureza não vigia: acompanha. É aqui que a sua realização se distingue — não por uma estética rigorosa, mas por uma ética clara. Filmar é expor vulnerabilidades. E expor vulnerabilidades exige cuidado. Portugal, esse laboratório emocional O país que surge nas obras de Pureza não é apenas cenário: é personagem. É o Portugal das contradições — pequeno mas exuberante, desconfiado mas carente de pertença, irónico mas sentimental, apaixonado mas contido. É um país onde a criatividade nasce da falta e onde o improviso se confunde com identidade. Pureza conhece esse país por dentro. Viu-o nos sets frenéticos das novelas, nos estúdios apressados da televisão generalista, nas equipas improváveis de produções independentes. E filma-o com um olhar feito de amor e lucidez: nunca subserviente, nunca destructivo, sempre profundamente humano. Há nele uma capacidade rara de observar sem desistir, de criticar sem amargar, de rir sem ferir. Infância, imaginação e paternidade Numa das passagens mais íntimas desta conversa, Pureza regressa à infância — não como nostalgia decorativa, mas como território de formação. A infância, para ele, é o sítio onde nasce a imaginação, mas também o sítio onde se aprende a cair, a duvidar, a arriscar. Esse lugar continua a acompanhar o seu trabalho como uma espécie de bússola emocional. Falar de infância leva inevitavelmente a falar de paternidade. Pureza rejeita a figura do pai iluminado, perfeito, imune ao erro. Fala antes da paternidade real: aquela onde se erra, se tenta, se repara, se adia, se volta a tentar. A paternidade que implica fragilidade. A paternidade que obriga a abrandar num mundo que exige velocidade. Talvez seja por isso que, quando dirige, recusa o automatismo: a vida, lembra, é sempre mais complexa do que aquilo que conseguimos filmar. Escutar como acto político Se há uma frase que atravessa toda a conversa, é esta: “Nós ouvimos pouco.” No contexto de Pureza, ouvir é um verbo político. Num país saturado de ruído, opiniões rápidas e indignações instantâneas, escutar tornou-se quase um acto contracultural. Ele trabalha nesse espaço de atenção — aquele que permite às pessoas serem pessoas, antes de serem personagens, headlines ou caricaturas. É por isso que o seu trabalho ressoa: porque devolve humanidade ao que, tantas vezes, o discurso público reduz. O que fica No final, a impressão é clara: Manuel Pureza não realiza apenas obras. Realiza ligações. Realiza espelhos que não humilham. Realiza pontes entre o ridículo e o sublime. Realiza histórias que, ao invés de nos afastarem, nos devolvem uns aos outros. Há artistas que acrescentam ao mundo um conjunto de imagens. Pureza acrescenta uma forma de ver. E num tempo em que olhar se tornou um acto cada vez mais acelerado — e cada vez menos profundo — isso não é apenas uma qualidade artística. É um serviço público da imaginação. LER A TRANSCRIÇÃO DO EPISÓDIO Esta transcrição foi gerada automaticamente. A sua exatidão pode variar. 0:12 Ora, vivam bem vindos ao pergunta simples, o vosso podcast sobre comunicação? Hoje recebemos alguém que não apenas realiza séries e filmes, mas realiza no sentido mais profundo do termo, a forma como olhamos para nós próprios, a maneira como nos espelhamos. 0:28 Manuel pureza é daqueles criadores que trabalham com rigor e com leveza, com inteligência, com humor, com disciplina e com um caos. Ele cresceu nas novelas, aprendeu a filmar sob pressão, descobriu um olhar que combina ternura com ironia e tornou se uma das vozes mais originais da ficção portuguesa. 0:46 E é capaz de pegar no ridículo e transformá lo em verdade, de pegar no quotidiano e transformá lo em drama, de pegar no drama e transformá lo em riso. Tudo sem perder a humanidade, o coração e a ética de quem sabe que filmar é escolher, ter um ponto de vista e que escolher é sempre um ato moral. 1:06 Neste episódio, abrimos as portas ao seu processo criativo, às dúvidas e às certezas, às dores e às gargalhadas, às memórias da infância e às inquietações da idade adultam. Falamos de televisão como um espaço de comunhão. Das novelas como um ginásio, do humor, como o pensamento crítico da arte de ouvir e de ser pai no mundo acelerado, da vulnerabilidade que existe por detrás de uma Câmara e, claro, de Portugal, este país pequeno, cheio de afetos e de feridas, onde tudo é simultaneamente muito absurdo e muito verdadeiro. 1:38 Pureza fala com profundidade e como honestidade às vezes. Desconcertante é uma dessas conversas em que senti que estamos a ver para além do artista, estamos a ver a pessoa, a sensibilidade das dúvidas, a Esperança e a inquietação de alguém que pensa o mundo através das histórias que nos conta. 2:05 Ao longo desta conversa, percebemos como as histórias, para Manuel pureza, não são apenas entretenimento. São uma estrutura emocional de uma forma de organizar o caos, uma linguagem antiga que herdamos mesmo antes de sabermos ler ou escrever. Falamos do poder das narrativas para dar sentido à vida, mas também do seu lado perigoso, porque todas as histórias têm um ponto de vista, todas têm escolhas e omissões, todas moldam a forma como vemos o que é real. 2:33 E ele, pureza. Assume isto sem medo. Assume que filma com olhar assumidamente subjetivo e que essa subjetividade é precisamente a sua assinatura. Não procura parecer neutro, procura ser honesto. Também exploramos a sua relação com o humor. 2:49 O humor que nunca é cínico, nunca é cruel, nunca é gratuito. O ridículo não é uma arma para diminuir os outros. É uma maneira de libertar, de expor o que há de comum entre nós, de desmontar o que é pomposo e de aliviar o peso de viver. 3:04 Diz na própria conversa que tudo pode ser ridículo e isso é uma forma de Redenção. O riso organiza o pensamento, afia o espírito, desarma o mundo e, talvez por isso, o pôr do sol. A série tem sido mais do que um fenómeno cômico, foi um fenómeno emocional quase terapêutico. 3:20 Um espelho carinhoso onde Portugal se reviu e se perdoou, um bocadinho. Falamos da ética, da ética, do olhar, de como se almar alguém. É sempre um ato de intimidade. De como se cria confiança dentro de um set de filmagens, como se dirige atores diferentes, como se acolhe fragilidades? 3:38 Várias. E falamos da amizade e esse tema que atravessa todo o trabalho de pureza, porque para ele, realizar não é apenas uma técnica, é uma escuta, uma presença, um cuidado. Ouvimos muitas vezes ao longo deste episódio, uma afirmação quase simples. Nós ouvimos pouco. 3:55 E quando alguém é capaz de. A olhar tanto e nos diz que ouvimos pouco. Vale a pena parar para escutar. E, claro, falamos de Portugal, um país pequeno, por vezes cínico, com uma profunda tendência para desconfiar do sucesso alheio. Um país que pureza filma com ironia, amor e lucidez. 4:14 E da inveja. Claro que falamos da inveja no país das novelas, do improviso, da criatividade teimosa, das personagens maiores que a vida. O país que ele conhece por dentro e por fora, e que aprende a amar com o humor, mesmo quando o humor é a única forma de suportá lo. Num dos momentos mais belos da conversa, falamos da infância, esse lugar de Liberdade, de curiosidade, de imaginação que pureza tenta manter vivo dentro de si. 4:39 E falamos também do que é ser pai, dos medos que isso acende, da responsabilidade que isso traz. Da paternidade iluminada, mas da paternidade real, onde se falha, se tenta, se repara, se ama e se recomeça. É um episódio cheio de emoções, pontos de vista e algumas surpresas. 5:01 Viva. Manuel pureza, olá, nós encontramo nos e na realidade, temos que dizer às pessoas desde já que há 2 características que nos unem na vida OKA primeira, gostar de pessoas. A segunda, sermos hipocondríacos. Ah, poças? 5:17 Bom, estou em casa sim, sim, sim. Poça altamente hipocondríaco? Sim. Olha, fala me das pessoas, para quem? Para quem não te conhece. Tu és realizador, és um dos mais originais e interessantes realizadores da ficção portuguesa, nomeadamente essa telenovela que subitamente se transformou num objeto de culto, uma coisa chamada pôr do sol. 5:40 Já agora digo te eu, a primeira vez que vi o pôr do sol, o primeiro episódio foi dos enganados. Achavas que era verdade. Pensei assim, é pá, mas o que é isto? Mas o que é que isto está? Mas, mas, mas, mas que coisa tão. EE depois. Lá está à terceira cena. 5:56 É aquela parte do ainda bem que ninguém ouviu o meu pensamento, claro, fala, me fala me desse fenómeno. Então esse fenómeno foi. Uma pulga, uma pulga, uma pulga, várias pulgas. Aliás, eu, eu, enquanto realizador, antes de começar a assinar as minhas séries, fiz 10 anos de telenovelas e fi Los numa lógica de ginásio. 6:22 Eu costumo dizer isto, ou seja, é uma tarefa difícil. É uma tarefa que luta contra. Vários tipos de preconceitos, não só meus, como de quem vê. É uma fábrica? É uma fábrica, sim. Aliás, será a coisa mais próxima de uma indústria audiovisual que nós temos em Portugal. 6:39 É, é, são as novelas. Não é? E isso filma se de que, de, de, de, de que horas? Até que horas? Filma se em horários que AACT se funcionasse não IA não preço, iria sim, iria tudo preço, não em boa verdade, até até podemos falar sobre isso mais à frente que é, eu estive envolvido nalgumas lutas laborais em relação à Malta, que faz novelas em Portugal. 6:58 Porque é pá, chega se a trabalhar trabalhava, se na altura 11 horas mais uma, quer dizer, IA receber colegas meus a receberem me francamente pouco, numa lógica de fazer 40 minutos diários de ficção útil, que é uma enormidade, uma alarvidade e que e que muitas vezes depois tem um efeito nefasto de das pessoas em casa. 7:17 Dizer assim é pá, isto é uma novela, isto não vale nada, mas o esforço das pessoas que estão a fazê la é hercúleo, é desumano. Não tem de ser forçosamente 11. Não tem furiosamente de levar as pessoas a apreciarem esse esforço como sinónimo de qualidade, porque muitas vezes as novelas não têm essa qualidade. 7:35 Portanto, não há tempo no fundo para respirar, para o tédio, para a repetição, para o prazer. Não, nem nem nem. Então por acaso que seja essa a função das novelas, até um certo ponto. As novelas historicamente são feitas para serem ouvidas, não para serem vistas, não é? Ou seja, não em países, não só Portugal, mas outros países machistas, em que as mulheres ficavam a tomar conta da casa e dali da casa, e não tinham trabalho. 7:57 Tinha uma televisão ligada para irem ouvindo. Por isso é que a novela é repetitiva. A novela é. Reiterativa há uma há uma métrica de comunicação. De comunicação, sim. E, portanto, se temos avançado tecnicamente e até qualitativamente nas novelas nos últimos 20 anos, porque temos? 8:13 Ainda estamos nos antípodas do que? Do que uma novela pode ser? A novela pode ser uma arma de educação fantástica. A novela pode ser um retrato. Quase numa perspetiva arqueológica do que é ser português em 2025. E não é disso que estamos a falar. Em quase nenhuma novela falamos disso, não é? 8:30 Talvez tenhamos 2 ou 32 ou 3 casos honestos de portugalidade nas novelas recentes. Ainda estou a falar, por exemplo, de uma novela que eu, eu não, eu não, não sou consumidor de novelas, confesso que não sou. Mas há uma novela que da qual me lembro da premissa que me pareceu interessante, que é uma coisa chamada golpe de sorte. 8:46 Uma mulher numa aldeia que ganhou o euromilhões. Isso pode ser bastante português. Parece me bem. Pode ser bom e tive um sucesso bastante grande e foi uma coisa honesta. Não era de repente alguém que é salvo por uma baleia no ataque de 2 tubarões e sobrevive porque foi atirada? Espera, enfim, ainda vou continuar, porque isso é uma realidade que acontece. Olha, porque é que nós, seres humanos, precisamos tanto de histórias para compreender o mundo? 9:08 Olha, eu acho que as histórias são o que nos estrutura, são aquilo que nos garante a sobrevivência. Até um certo.eu falo disto com os meus alunos. Eu às vezes dou uns workshops para atores e não só é só a palavra workshop dá me logo aqui, carrega me logo aqui umas chinetas um bocado estranhas. 9:24 O workshop downshoising downgraving assim não interessa estamos. Todos AAA praticar o inglês. O inglês neologisticamente falamos. A bom, a bom notícia é que nós, como falamos mal inglês, damos uns pontapés no inglês também terríveis, não é? Sim, sim, sim, mas sim, mas está o inglês. O inglês passou a ser uma espécie de língua Franca, exato, EEA. 9:41 Gente tem palavras bonitas para dizer. EEEEE não, diz. Voltamos às histórias, as histórias. E costumo falar disso com os meus alunos, que é que que passa por nós. Nós não nascemos com direitos humanos, não é? Não nascemos dentro do nosso, do nosso corpo. Não há aqui 11, saca com direitos humanos. 9:56 Houve alguém que inventou essa história e a escreveu numa numa carta universal dos direitos humanos e, portanto, a partir dessa narrativa de que as pessoas têm direito a ser felizes, direito a ter uma casa feliz, direito a ter uma família, direito a ser. A ter um trabalho, et cetera, essa narrativa e estou estou a, estou a, estou AA alargar Oo conceito, evidentemente essa narrativa salva nos todos os dias mais a uns do que a outros, infelizmente. 10:20 Então os dias correm, isso é muito frequente. Há há há zonas do mundo em que essa história não chega, não é? Essas histórias não chegam. A fantasia não chega. A fantasia, sobretudo, é essa coisa mais prática de, de, de, de nos regermos por aquela célebre história do Mello Brooks, não é? A Mello Brooks faz a história mais louca do mundo. 10:36 E o Moisés sobe ao sobe ao ao Monte e Deus dá lhe 15 mandamentos. Só que há uma das pedras que se parte. Ele diz, bom, ele deu me só 10. Inventou um bocado. Isto inventou mas 10 por acaso até um número melhor do que 15. Sim, 15 não dava. Jeito o marketing, ele lá da altura, o homem do marketing, disse disse 15. 10:53 Não dá jeito nada de ser mais redondo que não podem ser 17 nem 13. Não, não. Nem convém, não é para a enologia? Acho que não, não, não, não te ajuda nisso, mas eu acho que sim. As as histórias, sobretudo acima de tudo. Eu sou pai de 3 crianças. Uma criança mais velha que tem 14 anos e outra que tem 3 e outra que tem 11 ano e meio. 11:10 Já tens bom treino de conta histórias. Voltei a recuperá lo, não é? Ou seja, eu sempre andei sempre a treiná lo, porque esta é a minha profissão e é isso que me me entusiasma, não é? Ou seja, mais do que ter um ator que diz bem o texto que lá está e que o diz ipsis verbis como lá está, interessa me um ator que perceba o que é que quer ser dito e que o transforma numa história compreensível e emotiva. 11:29 Ou seja, no limite, é o que o Fellini diz, Oo Fellini diz. Oo cinema serve para para emocionar, seja para eu rir ou para chorar, serve para emocionar. EEO emocionar tem a ver com essa coisa das histórias. Quantas vezes é que tu não vês um é pá, o testemunho de alguém, uma carta que tu descobres 11 texto bonito, um poema simples ou soberbo, ou ou ou o que é que? 11:50 O que é que é uma boa história para mim, sim. Uma boa história é aquela que me lança perguntas, que te provoca sim, que me provoca perguntas, eu faço isso aos meus alunos lhe perguntar, qual é a tua história? E regregelas, confundem, qual é a tua história, qual é que é o meu bilhete de identidade? Então começam, Ah, nasci na amadora, depois foi não sei quê, depois não sei quantos, depois não sei quê, EEA mim, não me interessa, não me interessa mesmo saber se eles vieram da amadora ou não interessa me mais saber. 12:14 No outro dia, uma aluna dizia uma coisa fantástica, eu estou, eu estou aqui porque o meu irmão lê mal, é incrível, uau. E eu disse, então porquê? Eu já quero saber tudo sobre. Essa tua aluna? Queres ver o próximo episódio? Como é? A lógica é essa. Ou seja, eu acho que quando os miúdos estão a ler uma história como a Alice, querem saber quando é que ela cai no fundo do poço que nunca mais acaba. 12:31 Porque é que o poço nunca mais acaba? Porque é que no meio do poço se vão descobrindo retratos e coisas. E que poço é este? Que que coelho é este? Que coelho é que apareceu aqui a correr? E em princípio, não faz sentido nós, mas depois nós, nós nós entramos e embarcamos nesta história. E somos nós que a que a que a construímos. 12:47 Não é na nossa cabeça. Sim, sim. Na nossa cabeça, no nosso coração, de alguma maneira. Quer dizer, pensando, por exemplo, a minha experiência, a minha primeira experiência, aliás, a experiência que definiu a minha. Vontade de ir para para cinema e para o conservatório, et cetera. Conta te quando é que tu descobriste? 13:02 Foi haver uma lodon drive do David Lynch, eu tinha 15 anos. Que é um filme. Estranhíssimo, para filme extraordinário. Eu, eu não o entendo, lá está. Mas estás a ver? Portanto, mudou a tua vida e eu estou a sentir me aqui, o tipo mais perdido do mundo. Não, eu nem entendi o que é que eles estavam a falar. Não. A coisa fantástica desse filme é que é um filme absolutamente clássico, mas não está montado de maneira normal. 13:21 Ou seja, não há princípio, meio e fim por essa ordem. Mas ele é absolutamente clássico. É sobre a cidade dos sonhos, não é? É sobre um sonho. Sobre um sonho de uma mulher que desceu ao mais, mais mais horrível dos infernos de de Hollywood. E, portanto, aí eu vi me obrigado a participar nessa história. 13:39 Estás a ver? Tiveste que montar a história conforme estás a ver. Sim, e acho que isso é isso, é o que determina o que o que é uma boa história e o que é mero, no pior sentido de entretenimento. Podemos estabelecer aqui a diferença entre o que é que é uma. Uma história mais funcional, de uma história que nos que nos expande, porque todos nós, todos nós, temos a história. 14:01 Então, mas como é que foi? Olha o meu dia, eu vim para aqui, trabalhei, sentei, me e escrevi ao computador. E eu digo assim, não quero saber nada dessa história, quero mudas de canal, já não quero saber em cada muda de canal, às vezes mudamos até de conversa. Há há 27 páginas da literatura portuguesa que são muito características e toda a gente se lembra que é AAA caracterização da frente de uma casa chamada ramalhete. 14:24 E na altura, quando tínhamos 1415 anos, a dor achámos que era uma dor. Mas se se recuperarmos isso é provavelmente as coisas mais brilhantes, porque mistura precisamente o que tu estás a dizer, ou seja, uma coisa meramente funcional, não é? É. Esta era a casa e são 27 páginas e, ao mesmo tempo, essa casa é metáfora para o que se vai para o que se vai passar nos capítulos à frente é o. 14:47 Cenário. É EE, mais do que o cenário. É um personagem, não é aquela casa, é uma personagem. Porque os objetos podem ser personagens. Podem? Então não podem? Claro que sim. A Sério? Para mim, sim, claro que sim. Sem falar. Sem falar às vezes, eu prefiro atores que não falam do que com. Atores que? Não, eu digo isto muito dos meus atores. 15:03 É, prefiro filmar te a pensar do que a falar, porque. Porque isso é uma regra antiga do do cinema e da televisão, da ficção para televisão que é mostra me não me digas, não é? As as novelas são reiterativas, porque tem de ser tudo dito. A pessoa entra, diz, faz e pensa a mesma coisa. 15:19 E também não há muito dinheiro para para mostrar com com a qualidade e com é, dá. Há, não há é tempo. Talvez isso seja um sinónimo. Não havendo, se se houvesse mais dinheiro, haveria mais tempo e, portanto, eu acho que ainda assim seria absolutamente impossível alguém humano e mesmo desconfio que o site GPT também não é capaz de o fazer de escrever 300 episódios de uma história. 15:38 Eu estou. Eu estou a pensar aqui. Eu. Eu ouvi alguém a dizer, não me recordo agora quem, infelizmente, que era. Quando quando se faz um roteiro, aquilo que está escrito para se filmar uma determinada coisa, que todos os adjetivos que que lá estão escritos têm que ser mostrados, porque não adianta nada dizer. 15:55 Então entrou agora na cena, EEEE salvou a velhinha, certo? Está bem, mas isso não chega, não é? Sim, eu até te digo, eu, eu prefiro. Regra geral, os argumentos até nem são muito adjetivos, os argumentos, ou seja, o script nem é muito adjetivado. É uma coisa mais prática. Eu acho que essa descoberta está. 16:13 Não sei. Imaginem, imaginem a leres Oo estrangeiro do camus, não é? Tem Montes de possibilidades dentro daquele não herói, dentro daquela vivência, daquela existência problemática. Não é porque não se emociona, et cetera e tudo mais. 16:29 Como é que tu imagina que tinhas um argumento ou um script sobre sobre Oo estrangeiro? Eu acho que seria importante discuti lo profundamente com os atores. Tu fazes isso porque queres ouvir a opinião deles? Quero sempre eu acho que os atores que se os atores e as atrizes que são atores e atrizes, não são meros tarefeiros. 16:52 Qual é o fator x deles? O fator x? Deles, sim. O que é? Eu estou. Eu tive aí uma conversa aqui Na Na, neste, exatamente neste estúdio com com a Gabriela Batista, com a com a com a com a Gabriela Barros. E eu não preciso de saber e não sei nada sobre técnica, mas. 17:09 Eu, eu, eu imagino que qualquer munição que se dei àquela mulher, que ela vai transformar aquilo noutra coisa completamente diferente. O Woody Allen dizia uma coisa muito interessante que Era Eu sempre odiei ler e depois percebi que para conhecer mulheres interessantes, precisava de ler 2 ou 3 livros. 17:27 Para ser um pronto atual à certa. O que é que acontece com a Gabriela? A Gabriela é uma pessoa interessante. Os atores e as atrizes que são atores e atrizes são pessoas interessantes porque são inquietas, porque são atentas, porque percebem, porque conseguem. Conseguem ler não só uma cena, mas as pessoas que estão em cena com elas conseguem ler um realizador, conseguem ler uma história e, sobretudo, perceber. 17:50 Imagina se pensares no rei leão? Muitas vezes a pergunta sobre o que é que é O Rei Leão? As pessoas menos, menos levadas para as histórias dizem, Ah, é sobre um leãozinho. Que sofre? Não, não, não é sobre isso, é sobre família, é sobre herança, é sobre poder, é sobre legado, é sobre. No fundo, é sobre todos os conceitos que qualquer drama shakespeariano ou tragédia shakespeariana também é. 18:14 E, portanto, eu acho que quando tu encontras atores e atrizes a Sério, o fator x é serem interessantes porque têm ideias e porque pensam. Não se limitam a fazer pá. Um ator que se limita a fazer e diz o textinho muito, muito, muito certinho. É um canastal enerva me enerva, me dá vontade de lhes bater. 18:30 Não, não gosto disso, não me interessa. E isso não é sinónimo de desrespeito pelo argumento. É sublimar o argumento ou sublimar o scripta, a outra coisa que não é lida. É fermentar aquilo? Sim, eu diria que sim. É regar? Sim. Olha, eles oferecem te obviamente maneiras de fazer e a interpretação do texto, mas. 18:50 E tu tens a tua parte e a tua parte é aquilo que eu posso te chamar a ética do olhar, que é o teu ponto de vista o ponto de vista como eu queria dizer, como é que tu defines o ponto de vista? Como é que tu escolhes? Se queres fazer uma coisa mais fechada, mais aberta, de cima, de lado, o que é esse? E tu pensas nisso para além da técnica. 19:09 Sim, penso eu acho que o meu trabalho, Oo trabalho do realizador, no geral, é essa filtragem da realidade. Para, para encaminhar. Para encaminhar a história e encaminhar quem a vê ou quem, quem está a ver, para uma determinada emoção ou para uma determinada pergunta ou para determinada dúvida. 19:31 Para lançar de mistério. Enfim, eu, eu tenho. Eu sinto que eu tenho 41 anos, tenho já alguns anos de de realização, mas sinto que estou sempre não só a aprimorar, mas a encontrar melhor. Qual é a minha linguagem. 19:47 O pôr do sol não tem qualquer espécie de desafio do ponto de vista da linguagem. Ele é a réplica de uma de uma linguagem televisiva chata de de planos abertos, o plano geral. E agora vem alguém na porta, plano fechado na porta, plano fechado na reação, plano fechado na EE. Isso para mim, enquanto realizador, não foi um desafio maior. 20:05 Talvez tenha sido o desafio do corte, o desafio. Do ritmo da cena, da marcação da cena. Para, por exemplo. Há uma coisa que eu digo sempre e que é verdade no pôr do sol, sempre que as pessoas pensam, vão para o pé das janelas. Porque é uma cena de novela, não é? Eu vou aqui passar ao pé de uma janela e põem, se encostadas às janelas a pensar, não é pronto. 20:21 Isso tem muita. Influência olhando para o Horizonte? Horizonte longico não é essa aquelas coisas. Portanto, isso tem muita influência dos Monty Python, tem muita influência dos dos dos Mel Brooks, da vida, et cetera, porque eu, porque eu sou fã incondicional de tudo o que surge dessas pessoas. Mas, por exemplo, se me perguntares em relação à série que eu fiz sobre o 25 de abril, o sempre já é outra coisa, já não tem, já não há brincadeira nesse sentido. 20:45 E como é que eu conto? Como é que eu conto a história das pessoas comuns do dia mais importante para mim enquanto português, da nossa história recente para mim? E, portanto, essa filtragem, essa escolha, essas decisões têm a ver com. 21:03 Eu, eu. Eu sinto que sou um realizador hoje, em 2025, final de 2025, sinto que sou um realizador que gosta que a Câmara esteja no meio das personagens. No meio, portanto, não como uma testemunha afastada. Exato, não como uma testemunha, mas como uma participante. 21:18 Pode ser um, pode ser um personagem da minha Câmara. Pode, pode. Eu lembro me quando estava a discutir com o meu diretor de fotografia com o Vasco Viana, de quem? De quem sou muito amiga e que é uma pessoa muito importante para mim. Lembro me de estar a discutir com ele. Como é que íamos abordar a Câmara na primeira série que nós assinámos coiote vadio em nome próprio que se chama, até que a vida nos cepare era uma série sobre uma família que organizava casamentos e eram eram 3 visões do amor, os avós dessa desse casal que tinha essa quinta de casamentos, que vivia também nessa quinta, esse casal de avós, para quem o amor era para sempre o casal principal nos seus cinquentas, para quem o amor está a acabar por razão nenhuma aparente. 21:56 Desgaste, talvez. O amor às vezes acaba e é normal, e em baixo os filhos. Para ela, o amor às vezes, e para ele o amor é um lugar estranho, ou seja, repara. São uma série de aforismos sobre o amor que eu vou ter de filtrar com a minha Câmara. 22:11 Portanto, a maneira como eu filmo uso a voz em que o amor é para sempre está dependente de toque da mão que se dá da dança que se surge no Jardim dele, acordar a meio da noite, sobressaltado porque ela está junto à janela, porque está a começar a sofrer. De uma doença neurológica e, portanto, ele está a sarapantado e vai ter com ela e cobra com um cobertor. 22:31 Portanto, todos estes toques diferentes. No caso do casal principal que se estava a separar, eles nunca param muito ao pé um do outro e, portanto, a Câmara tem de correr atrás de um para alcançar o outro e nunca lá chega. Há uma tensão. Sim, há sempre uma tensão. E depois nos no. No caso dos mais novos, ainda era o mais específico. Mas diria que o Vasco sugere me e se falemos os 2 sobre isto. 22:51 E se a Câmara não for entre pé? E for respirada, não é, não é não é Câmara mão agitada, mas é eu sentir que há uma respiração Na Na lente que ela está um ligeiramente abanada. É o suficiente para, se eu estiver a esta distância da personagem e a Câmara estiver mais ou menos a respirar, eu sinto que eu próprio o espetador. 23:10 Estou sentado naquele sofá a olhar para aquela pessoa, a olhar para aquele, para aquela pessoa, para aquela realidade, para aquela família, para para aquelas ideias, não é? E para essa ideia? Que se tenta explanar, em 3 gerações, o que é o amor? A pergunta mais inútil que eu tenho para te fazer é, o que raio faz um diretor de fotografia num? 23:28 Filme, então o diretor de fotografia, para quem não sabe, é é Quem é Quem. No fundo, comigo decide a estética. Da imagem, a luz, a luz acima de tudo. Eu trabalhei já com vários direitos da sociografia, de quem gosto muito. O Vasco Viana é um deles, o Cristiano Santos é outro, porque é uma porque é. 23:44 Que se gosta de um e não se gosta tanto de outro? Não. Às vezes não tem a ver com isso. Eu não me lembro de um. Talvez em novelas que tenham trabalhado com diretos de sociografia, que, enfim, que foram bons, outros nem tanto. Mas eles constroem uma estética, constroem uma luz, um ambiente. Nas séries, sim. Não é no cinema, sim. 24:00 Na televisão. Acho que é muito complicado porque. Porque se obedece a critérios, sobretudo dos canais. Que vêm com uma frase, quando eu comecei a fazer novelas, ainda estávamos a discutir se a coisa havia de serem 16:9 ou 4 por 3. Portanto, parecia que ainda estávamos a quase na Roménia dos anos 60. 24:16 EEE não estávamos e, ao mesmo tempo, estávamos muito próximos disso. EEE. No fundo, o que o diretor da fotografia faz é essa escolha da cor, da luz, do enquadramento, claro que em concordância com aquilo que eu pensei, mas é a primeira pessoa que consegue consubstanciar. 24:35 A minha visão sobre a história é isso. Olha, OOA, escolha de um plano para filmar é uma escolha moral. Também estava te a ouvir, agora a falar do 25 de abril e de e, portanto, 11. A ideia que tu tens sobre as coisas depois interfere também na maneira como tu escolhes um plano. 24:51 O que é que vais filmar ou como é que vais? Filmar, eu acho que, sobretudo, tem a ver com o eco que a história tem em ti. Não é uma coisa acética nem agnóstica. É uma coisa implicada, não é uma coisa implicada, isto é, se há uma ideia tua enquanto autor. Sobre a história, que vais esmiuçar em imagens, é mais ou menos a mesma coisa. 25:11 Que tu sabes que a Sophia de Mello breyner aprendeu gramática na escola. Eventualmente português teve aulas de português. Suspeitamos que. Sim, pronto. Aprendeu a escrever, mas ninguém a ensinou a fazer poemas. Vem dela. E essa implicação na escolha das palavras, da métrica do soneto ou do verso, et cetera, ou da ou da Quadra, ou, enfim, seja o que for. 25:30 É uma coisa que lhe vem de uma decisão. Não é de uma decisão, nem que seja do espírito, não é? Eu acho que o realizador tem a mesma função quando quando se permite e, acima de tudo, quando se assume como realizador e não um tarefeiro a mesma coisa que o ator. 25:46 Olha, como é que tu estás a falar de ficção? Obviamente, mas a ficção tem um poder secreto que é alterar a realidade ou a nossa perspetiva sobre a realidade ou não. Quando eu vejo, quando eu vejo que tu filmas uma determinada coisa num determinado prisma, com uma determinada ideia, eu, eu já quase não consigo ver a realidade como a realidade é eu, eu, eu já já tenho mais uma camada de tu vais me pondo umas lentes, não é? 26:15 Quer dizer, olha para aqui, olha para acolá. Sim, mas repara, os livros têm o mesmo poder, não é? Desde que tu te deixes contagiar com uma ideia, a arte. A arte, seja ela. Seja ela sobre a forma de uma Mona lisa ou de uma comédia, não é é essa reconfiguração do real para ser percecionada pelo outro. 26:40 E o outro pode se deixar contagiar ou não se deixar contagiar. Imagina que tu não achavas piada nenhuma ao pôr do sol? Há pessoas que não acharam piadinha nenhuma ao pôr do. Sol desligas te não vais ver? Sequer. Mas não vais ver isso? O teu real continua, ou seja, a minha. A minha pretensão com o pôr do sol não é mudar o mundo. Não é mudar, é divertir, me em primeiro lugar e achar que isto pode pode divertir. 27:02 Pessoas pode fazer umas cócegas à moda? Pode fazer cócegas à moda, aliás, pode pôr o dedo na ferida até rir. Estás a ver. Sim, porque depois tu é assim aqui. A história obviamente é engraçada. EE aquilo dá vontade de rir, mas tu gozas com todo o tipo de preconceitos e mais algum que lá estão em cima da mesa. 27:17 Claro. E esse EE aí também se tem de fazer jus ao ao texto que me chega do Henrique dias. Ou seja. Eu, o Rui e o Henrique discutimos a ideia. Eu e o Rui tínhamos uma lista extensa de tudo o que se passa em novelas, quem é a esta hora, quem é que Há de Ser no meu telemóvel, beber copos, partir, copos, cavalos, bem, famílias ricas, et cetera. 27:36 Mas depois o Henrique tem esse condão de agarrar nessas ideias e de algumas de algumas storylines que nós vamos lançando, é pá. E fazer aqueles diálogos que são absolutamente fabulosos, não é? Quer dizer, lembro, me lembrei, me. Lembro me sempre de vários, mas há uma, há um, há um apidar no na primeira temporada, que é talvez o meu plano favorito, que é um dos membros da banda que vem a correr desde o fundo do plano e que cai em frente à Câmara e diz, não, não, eu estou bem. 27:59 Dê me um panado e um local que eu fico logo bué, pronto. Isto é uma coisa muito nossa, muito proximidade, que tem graça porque tu já ouviste alguém dizer isto e pronto. E quando se tem essa, quando se tem essa junção porreira de de sentidos, de humor. 28:17 A tendência é que isso crie, crie qualquer coisa de reconhecimento. O que nós encontrámos com o pôr do sol foi um reconhecimento, é pá, surpreendeu, me surpreendeu me ao máximo e depois açambarcou nos a todos e foi a Suburbano a sobrevoou me de uma maneira assustadora, foi, imagina, eu tive um acidente de Mota pouco tempo depois da primeira temporada acabar, fui ao chão e fiquei, fiquei magoado e fiz me nada de especial, estava no hospital. 28:46 E o enfermeiro chefe dizia, sistema anel, pureza, agora vou pôr aqui um megaze, não sei quê. Ou sistema anel, pureza, não sei quê, mas assim. 11 trato espetacular. Uma coisa muito, muito solene, muito solene, e é. Pá e nas tantas ele estava a fazer o tratamento e disse assim, é pá e vê lá se tens cuidado e eu, espera aí, houve aqui qualquer coisa, houve aqui um problema na Matrix ou então não sei o que é que aconteceu e o gajo diz, desculpe, desculpa, é que eu sou de massamá e eu sei o que é que é cheirar AIC 19, todos os dias que é uma tirada do pôr do sol posso chamar os meus colegas assim? 29:12 O que é que se passa? Entraram para aí 5 ou 6 enfermeiros. Dizer é pá, obrigado. Pelo pôr do sol, por isso é convidada, portanto, Na Na enfermaria. Todo todo arrebentado. E eles todos quando em dia e eu percebi pronto, isto bateu, bateu a um nível de podemos reconciliar a televisão com uma certa cultura pop que teve alguns exemplos extraordinários na comédia ao longo da nossa história. 29:34 Temos o Raul solnado, temos o Herman José, temos Oo Ricardo Araújo Pereira e o gato fedorento, o Bruno Nogueira. Esses. Esse, atualmente, o Bruno Nogueira e o Ricardo Araújo Pereira continuarão a? Fazer são fundações, no fundo, são coisas que a gente olha e diz assim, uou. Eu acho que experimentei um bocadinho disso. Ele experimentava esta equipa, experimentou um bocadinho disso, quando de repente temos pá, um Coliseu de Lisboa cheio para ver uma banda que está a fazer playback. 29:56 Nós fizemos isso com Jesus Cristo, não é? A banda do pôr do sol foi tocar, não tocou nada, ninguém deles. Nenhum dos tocou, não sabem tocar e. Esgotámos OOO Coliseu para ouvirmos uma cassete em conjunto e as pessoas foram. Para participar num episódio ao vivo que não era episódio, não estava a ser. Filmado sequer tu vendeste, tu vendeste uma fantasia que toda a gente sabe que não existia, mas a ideia de comunhão. 30:16 Foi nessa narrativa e eu acho que isto é uma coisa que nos anda a faltar cada vez mais, não é? Nós nós não temos essas comunhões. Tu vês uma série? Ou melhor, é mais frequente teres um diálogo com um amigo e diz assim, pá, tens de ver aquela série, não sei quê, é espetacular, não sei quê quantos episódios, viste? Vi meio, mas é espetacular. 30:32 E já não é aquela coisa de Bora fazer um? Serão lá em casa, em que juntamos amigos e vemos um filme? Como aconteceu antigamente, antes da televisão se alinear? Antes de antes da da televisão te permitir uma ilusão de poder da escolha, não é? Eu agora escolho o que vejo. E a televisão morreu? Nada, não. 30:49 Nem vai morrer. É como a rádio morreu, não é? Quer dizer, a gente volta e meia a rádio a. Rádio a rádio tem mais vidas que um gato. Não é pronto porque a rádio foi ver o apagão, não é? O apagão foi uma. O apagão foi um delírio. Apagou tudo para. Os da rádio? Claro, claro. Evidentemente, isso era o que havia. E isso é extraordinário, porque isso faz, nos faz nos perceber que a volatilidade das das novas tecnologias etcétera, pá, é porreiro, é óbvio. 31:11 Então agora temos aqui 2 telemóveis, estamos anão é? Estamos aqui a filmar. Temos boa parafernália, mas mas. No limite. Naquele momento em que achávamos todos que a Rússia atacar e não era nada disso, o que queríamos era ouvir alguém a falar. Connosco o fenómeno dos podcasts como este é eu, eu dou por mim assim que é. 31:30 Eu gosto de ouvir pessoas à conversa, porque me acalma e me baixa o ritmo do scroll. Há uma. Música, não é? E é EEEE, aprendes qualquer coisa. E por isso é que eu gosto de pessoas. Estás a ver quando eu, eu houve uma vez 11 coisa que me aconteceu que eu acho que que é pá, que eu nunca mais me esqueci, que foi um amigo meu. 31:48 Que, entretanto, nunca mais falámos, é um facto. As histórias foram para os sítios diferentes, mas um dia entrou me para casa, à dentro. Eram para aí 10 da noite e diz me assim, preciso de conversar. E perguntei, lhe mas o Gonçalo de quê? Não, pá de nada, preciso só de conversar. Tens tempo para conversar e eu fiquei. 32:07 Isso é uma grande declaração, isto é. Extraordinário. Pouco tempo depois, estava em Angola a fazer uma série, uma novela. Perdão, uma. A melhor novela que eu fiz na vida é que foi uma novela para Angola, uma coisa chamada jikounisse. E há um assistente meu, Wilson, que chega 2 horas atrasado ao trabalho, é pá e era um assistente de imagem, fazia me falta. 32:25 Ele chega, Ah, presa, peço desculpa, cheguei atrasado e tal só para o Wilson 2 horas atrasado, o que é que aconteceu? Tive um amigo que precisou de falar e eu juro te que me caiu tudo, eu não lhe. Eu quero ter um amigo assim, eu não. Posso, sim. Eu não me lembro disto acontecer em Portugal. 32:42 Para mim, disse. Para mim mesmo, eu não me lembro. De. De. De dar prioridade a um amigo em detrimento do trabalho. Porque o trabalho me paga as contas e os filhos e não sei quê. E o ritmo e a carreira. E eu reconheci me e de repente há um amigo meu que precisa de conversar. 32:58 Estamos a ouvir pouco. Então, não estamos eu acho que estamos. Estamos mesmo muito. Temos mesmo muito a ouvir, a ouvir muito pouco, acho mesmo, acho mesmo. Isso isso aflige me sobretudo porque há um, há um é pá. Eu estou sempre a dizer referências, porque eu, de repente, nestas conversas, lembro me de coisas. O Zé Eduardo agualusa assina 11 crónica, creio no público há, há uns anos, largos da importância de, de, de, de de fazer mais bebés, porque o mundo está tão perdido que só trazendo gente boa, muita gente boa de uma vez em catadupa. 33:29 É que isto melhora e eu acho, essa visão. Uma chuva de. Bebés uma chuva de bebés, mas de, mas de bebés bons, de bebés, inquietos, de bebés que fazem birras pelas melhores razões de bebés, que brincam sem computadores, sem coisas que que se que chafurdam na, na lama, et cetera, fazem asneiras. 33:45 Sim, sim, eu, eu, eu gosto muito de ser pai, mais até do que ser realizador, gosto muito de ser pai e acho que isso é é precisamente por essas, pelos meus filhos, claro que são os meus, mas se tivesse, se houvesse outras crianças. De que eu tomasse conta? Acho que era isso que é. 34:01 Tu perceberes que até uma certa idade nós não temos de nos armar noutra coisa que não ser só crianças. E acho que eu pessoalmente, acho que tenho 41 anos e às vezes sinto uma criança perdida até dizer chega EE, acho que pronto. 34:18 Enfim, o tempo vai adicionando, adicionando te camadas de responsabilidade. Agora temos temos de saber mexer microfones, inverter a água, et cetera, e meter fones, et cetera. Mas, no fundo, somos um bocado miúdos perdidos a quem? A quem se chama pessoas adultas porque tem de ser, porque há regras, porque há responsabilidades e coisas a cumprir. 34:35 Acho que só o Peter Pan é que se conseguiu livrar dessa ideia de poder. Crescer, coitado. Já viste? Pois é mesmo o Peter Pan sem andar com aquelas botas ridículas também. Exato. EE, qual é? Sabemos. E o capitar, não é? Pensando bem, a história dramática é o que quando estás com neuras a tua vida é um drama refugias te na comédia fechas te de ti próprio. 34:55 Não queres falar com ninguém? Quando estou com. Que é frequente é. Frequenta é? Então, o que é que te bate? O que é que te faz o. Que me bate é nos dias que correm e não só não conseguir tocar à vontade na minha função enquanto artista. 35:15 Isto eu vou te explicar o que é. Os artistas não precisam de ser de um quadrante político ou de outro. Eu eu sou de esquerda, assumidamente de esquerda. EEE, defenderei até à última este esses ideais. Ainda à esquerda, direita. Há, há, há. Eu acho que há, há. É cada vez menos gente com quem se possa falar de um lado e de outro. 35:32 Há uma. Polarização sim, sim, porque porque, enfim, isso são são outras conversas, mas o os artistas, no meu entender, estão a perder a sua perigosidade isso enerva me, ou seja, eu às vezes sinto que não estou anão, não estou a transgredir. 35:49 Não estou a ser perigoso, não estou a questionar, não estou. Estou a ir ao sabor de uma coisa terrível, que é ter de pagar as minhas contas. É o rame. Rame mais do que isso é eu deixar me levar pela corrida que é. Tenho de ter mais dinheiro, tenho de conseguir a casa, tenho de conseguir a escola dos putos tenho, não sei quê. 36:07 Devias ser mais um moscado, aquele que que dava umas picadelas aqui à. Eh pá devia questionar. Devia. Os artistas são se nasceram para isso e eu se me se eu me considero artista e às vezes isso é difícil. Dizer isso de mim, de mim para comigo. Eu imagina o Tiago Pereira, o Tiago Pereira que anda AA fazer um acervo da música portuguesa, a gostar dela própria, pelo pelo país todo, com gente antiga, com gente nova, com com gente toda ela muito interessante. 36:36 A importância de um Tiago Pereira no nosso, no nosso país, é é inacreditável. Quantas pessoas é que conhecem o Tiago Pereira? E, pelo contrário, não estamos focados Na Na última Estrela do ou do TikTok ou do big Brother ou de outra coisa qualquer. 36:51 Até podia ser uma coisa boa, estás a ver? Ou seja. Complementar uma coisa e outra. Sim, ou seja, eu, eu. A coisa que mais me interessa é saber quem é que com 20 anos, neste momento está a filmar em Portugal e há muita gente boa. Tu vês os projetos da RTP play e da RTP lab? E é gente muito interessante. Então, e porque é que? 37:06 Nós não estamos a estornar essa gente? E a e a potencial? Porque, porque a corrida? É mais importante, ou seja, tu queres a. Corrida dos ratos Na Na roda. É e é coisa de chegar primeiro, fazer primeiro, ganhar mais que o outro, não a solidariedade é uma, é uma fraqueza AA generosidade é uma fraqueza aplaudires alguém que é teu par é mais, é mais um penso para a tua inveja do que propriamente uma coisa de quem é que ganhamos? 37:34 Todos vamos lá. OOOO rabo de peixe, por exemplo, é um é um caso lapidar nesse sentido. Que é o rapaz? É extraordinário. É extraordinário neste sentido, eu? Posso? A primeira série é uma pedrada No No charco, que é uma coisa mágica o. 37:50 O Augusto Fraga, que é uma pessoa que eu, de quem eu gosto bastante e conheço o mal, mas gosto bastante, assina uma série que a primeira coisa que foi vista sobre essa série, ainda que estivéssemos a com 35000000 de horas ou 35000000 de horas, sim, vistas por todo o mundo. 38:08 Ah, não sei quantas pessoas, minhas colegas, tuas colegas, enfim, colegas de várias pessoas que estão a ver este mote caso dizem assim, ó, mas eles nem sequer fizeram o sotaque açoriano. Ah, e aquela e aquela ideia de não contrataram só atores açorianos? Pronto, sim, vamos ver uma coisa, porque porque é que vamos sempre para essa zona precisamente por causa da corrida, porque isto é importante. 38:32 A inveja é lixada? Nada. Fraga sim, a inveja é lixada e mais do que isso, esta inveja. É patrocinada pelo sistema, o sistema, o sistema sublima. Quando nós achamos que quem, quem, quem é nosso inimigo é quem faz a mesma coisa do que nós, nós temos menos de 1% para a cultura neste país. 38:50 E quando há dinheiro, quando há dinheiro, nós andamos a tentar queimar o outro para conseguirmos chegar ao dinheiro, ou seja, perante as migalhas. Nós não nos organizamos, a dizer assim. Pá a mão que está a dar as migalhas é que está errada. 39:05 Não. O que acontece é não. Mas eu já discutimos isso. Primeiro eu preciso de de amoedar as migalhas para mim e depois então discutimos, é uma. Corrida mal comparado de esfomeados. É, mas em vários. Mas é. Não estou a ver só na cultura, não é? Não é só na cultura. E. Já dizia o Zé Mário branco, arranja me um emprego. 39:22 O Zé Mário branco dizia tanta coisa tão mais importante, tão tão tão importante nos dias que correm, o Zé Mário branco, enfim. Mas eu até diria que isto, que este país que é pequeno. Que é pequeno em escala. Que é pequeno, que é pequena escala. 39:39 Podia ver nisso uma vantagem. Podíamos ver nisso uma vantagem, porque eu acho que o país somos nós e acho que as pessoas não. Não temos essa noção, não é EE essa e essa noção de que não dedicamos tempo suficiente a estarmos uns com os outros e de ligarmos as peças boas e de tornar isto uma coisa mais interessante, claro. 39:57 Interessa me, interessa me. Muito há uma cultura de mediocridade, não? Isso eu acho que não, o que eu acho é que há. Ou melhor, como é que se compatibiliza esse essa corrida dos ratos na roda, em busca da última migalha com coisas de excelência que subitamente aparecem? 40:13 Eu acho que quando tu sentes que isso é um acidente, rapaz, isso é um acidente, não é? É um acidente. Antes tinha tinha havido o Glória e nós tínhamos achado. Tio Glória era a primeira coisa da Netflix. Parece um bocado aquela coisa de o ator que é pá. 40:29 Eu sou um grande ator. Eu fiz uma formação no Bahrain para aprender a ser a fazer de post. Foi uma formação de meia hora, chega cá e dentro e vai dizer assim, é pá. Este gajo é bom meu. O gajo esteve no barrain. Vende-se bem este. Gajo é bom, não é? E de repente não. Ele esteve no barém a fazer de post e é melhor do que um puto que veio da PTC ou 11 miúda que veio da STCE está a tentar vingar. 40:50 Eu tive agora uma conversa por causa da da dos encontros da GDA para para o qual foi foi gentilmente convidado e foi foi incrível estar à conversa com Malta nova. Não é assim tão nova quanto isso, mas Malta entre os 25 e os 35 anos, atores e atrizes, em 4 mesas redondas em que IA assaltando eu, o António Ferreira, a Soraia chaves e a Anabela Moreira, é pá EEAEA dúvida é a mesma de que se houvesse uma mesas redondas de veterinários, de veterinários ou de médicos, ou de ou de assistentes sociais, que é como é que eu começo isto? 41:20 Como é que eu faço isto? Qual é o percurso, onde é que está? O repente GDA faz uma coisa incrível que é, vamos pôr as pessoas a conversar. É um bom início, pá, é um. Excelente início. E nós não andamos a fazer isso, não andamos a fazer isso, por mais associações que haja, por mais coisas, et cetera. E há gente a fazer este, a tentar fazer este trabalho. 41:38 Não há um sindicato da minha área que funcione. O sindicato dos criativos pode ser então? O sindicato, o Sena, o sindicato Sena. As pessoas queixam se que não é um sindicato, mas não estão nele. Quando eu digo que não há um sindicato, é o sindicato, existe. As pessoas é que não vão para lá e queixam se das pessoas que lá estão. 41:55 Isto não faz sentido nenhum. Ou seja, nós estamos sempre à espera que nos dêem. Mas é aquela coisa velha, essa coisa que foi o Kennedy, que disse não é não, não perguntes. O que é que o teu país pode fazer por ti? Pergunta te, o que é que tu podes fazer pelo teu? Portanto, não temos uma mecânica por um lado de devolução à sociedade daquilo que nós estamos AA receber e, por outro lado, de de agregação, num interesse comum, ou numa imaginação comum, ou em alguma coisa que podemos fazer juntos. 42:17 Eu, eu acho que, sobretudo, tem a ver com celebramos? Não, acho que não. Até porque é tudo uma tristeza, não? É, não, não, não. Eu acho que é assim. Eu acho é que é tudo muito triste porque não nos celebramos. Porque há razões enormes para nos celebrarmos, há razões mesmo boas, para nos celebrarmos. Bom, mas eu não quero deprimir te mas um tipo que chuta 11 coisa redonda de couro e que acerta numa Baliza é mais valorizado do que um poeta que escreveu o poema definitivo sobre o amor ou sobre a vida? 42:43 Mas isso, pão e circo? Isso pão e circo. E isso a bola também é importante. E está tudo bem? Eu sou. Mas tão importante. Não é? Porque eu eu gosto de futebol, gosto. Eu gosto de futebol, sou um, sou um. Sou um fervoroso adepto da académica de Coimbra e do. Falibana do Benfica, da da académica, sou da académica. 43:00 Está péssima, não é? A académica está terrível, mas é isso. Ou seja. Eu acho que tem, Maura continua, tem? Maura, claro. E terá sempre. Eu sou, sou, sou da briosa até morrer, mas. Mas de qualquer das maneiras, sinto que essa coisa que é, há espaço para tudo. Eu acho que eu o que faz falta? E animar a Malta? 43:17 É educar a Malta? É educar a Malta. Faz muita falta. Eu acho que faz muita falta a educação neste país. E isso tem a ver com política, tem a ver com escolhas, tem a ver com coragem. EAAA educação não tem sido muito bem tratada nos últimos tempos. 43:35 Se há gente que se pode queixar são os professores e os. Alunos, porque nós só descobrimos daqui a 10 anos ou 20 que isto não correu bem. Claro, mas já estamos a descobrir agora, não é? Depois, já passaram algum tempo sim. Quais é que são as profissões de algumas das pessoas que estão no hemiciclo que tu reconheces profissões não é? 43:52 De onde é que vêm? Vêm das jotas vêm. São juristas, normalmente economistas, certo? Mas um médico. Há um ou 2? Há um ou 2, há alguém que tu, um professor? Deixa de ser atrativo. A política devia ser essa coisa de eu reconhecer. 44:10 Figuras referenciais. Os melhores entre nós que que escolhidos para liderarmos, sim. Escolhidos por nós. Ou seja, porque é que eu acho isto? Mas eu acho isto desde sempre, sempre, sempre. Eu sei isto. Aliás, eu venho de uma casa que é bastante politizada. A minha casa, a minha família é bastante politizada. O apelido. 44:27 De pureza não engana. Pois não engana. Às vezes acham que ele é meu irmão, mas é meu pai. EE pá é um gajo novo. De facto, é um gajo novo. Mas é isso que é caneco. Quem são estas pessoas? Porque é que eu vou votar nestas pessoas, estas pá. A prova agora de Nova Iorque não é 11 Mayer de 34 anos, chamado zoranmandani, que de repente ganha as eleições sem os mesmos apoios, que teve outro candidato. 44:50 Não houve Bloomberg, não houve Trump, não houve nada. Houve um tipo que veio falar para as pessoas e dizer lhes o que é que vocês precisam, de que é que precisam, o que é que vos aflige, de que é que têm medo, que sonhos é que vocês têm? Isso é tão importante e tão raro. 45:06 Afinal, o método que funciona sempre não é fala com pessoas, conta uma história ou houve cria uma expectativa? Olha, porque é que o humor explica tão bem o mundo? Eu sei, também há o choro, porque é que o humor explica tão bem? Porque tudo pode ser ridículo. E é e é tão ameaçador, não é? 45:22 Claro, claro, claro. Olha o Rio, vai nu. Exatamente tal e qual tem a ver com isso, não é? E mais do que isso, é eu, eu acho. Eu sinto que nós vivemos num país que não tem assim tanto sentido de humor. E explico porquê nós não nos rimos tanto de nós. Rimos mais dos outros quando nos rimos de nós? 45:39 É é tipo, Ah, então, mas mas estão a falar de mim. Rimos de escárnio. Sim, os os melhores, as melhores pessoas, as melhores pessoas portuguesas a terem sentido humor são os alentejanos. Porque são eles que têm as melhores notas sobre eles. Que eles próprios contam? Exatamente quando tu tens um. 45:54 Eu não sou lisboeta, portanto, posso dizer mal à vontade de vocês todos que estão a ouvir. Quando o lisboeta disse assim também. Sou alto minhoto, portanto, já estamos. Estás à vontade, não é pronto quando o lisboeta disse. Tudo que seja abaixo, abaixo, ali do cavado é soul. É soul? Exatamente. Está resolvido, pá. A minha cena é coisa do quando o lisboeta diz, tenho aqui uma nota sobre alentejana dizer, Hum. 46:11 A minha família toda alentejana, pá. Não, não acho que acho que não é bem a coisa eu diria isso, ou seja, porque é que o amor explica tão bem o mundo, explica no sentido em que, de facto, isto esta frase não é minha, é do Henrique dias. E ele acho que acho que ressintetiza isto muitíssimo bem. O argumentista do pôr do sol, que é tudo, pode ser ridículo. 46:28 O gajo da bola de couro, um círculo de de de couro que é chutado para uma Baliza, é tão ridículo como é eventualmente alguma. De algum ponto de vista sobre a religião, sobre a política, sobre a economia, sobre os cultos? 46:46 Não é os cultos pessoalizados em líderes que de repente parece que vêm resolver isto tudo e são ridículos. Quer dizer, são ridículos acima de tudo. O mito do Salvador da pátria. O mito do Salvador da pátria não é? Depois ficou substanciado em 60 fascistas. Isso é para mim. Era expulsos ao ridículo. 47:02 Incomoda os imensos. Mas a gente já viu isto em vários momentos, desde momentos religiosos até momentos políticos que é. E este vem lá ao Messias, vem lá ao Messias. E o cinema português também. O próximo filme vem sempre salvar isto tudo. E é só um filme percebes o que eu estou a dizer? Ou seja, não. 47:18 Este é que é o filme que toda a gente vai ver e vai rebentar com as Caldas. Não, não tem de ser assim, é só um filme. Só me lembro da Branca de Neve, do João César Monteiro, não é que filmou uma coisa para preto, para negro? Sim, mas mais do que isso, estava a falar de termológica comercial que é, os exibidores estão sedentos? 47:35 Que venham um filme que faça muitos números e que salve o cinema, et cetera. A pressão que se coloca, se fosse fácil fazer um filme desses, até eles próprios administradores teriam ideias. Sim, faz mesmo. A campanha viral lembro me sempre é. Faz uma coisa que vai ocupar toda a gente vai falar exatamente e que vai ser uma coisa. 47:51 Extraordinária. Um escândalo, no melhor sentido. Não sei quê, não sei quê e depois não acontece porque não é assim que as coisas não é, as pessoas não vão, não vão. Nessas modas, aliás, as pessoas estão cada vez mais dentro. O paradoxo é que as pessoas estão cada vez mais exigentes. O que é bom? Sim, mas dentro desta lógica que temos falado, que é tiktoks, et cetera, volatilidade é uma coisa superficial e de repente já nem tudo cola. 48:12 O humor repara o humor. O Bruno Nogueira, por exemplo, é um bom exemplo disso que é o Bruno Nogueira faz 111 programa extraordinário vários. Faz os contemporâneos, faz o último a sair, depois faz o princípio meio e fim, que é uma coisa arrojadíssima. Sim, ele faz coisas sempre diferentes. 48:28 Não é ele. Ele. Ele quebra os padrões sempre. Mas se reparares agora, neste, no, no, no ruído, ele já não é a mesma coisa. É um programa de Sketch que tem lá uma história que num tempo distópico em que. Sim, mas aquilo resolve se a um conjunto de de Sketch e as. 48:45 Pessoas aderiram massivamente, portanto, eu acho que isto é assim. A roda vai dando voltas. Depois voltamos um bocado à mesma coisa. O Herman, por exemplo, o Herman que é um dos meus heróis da televisão. O Herman andou por todas essas ondas e agora está numa onda de conversa e tudo mais. 49:04 E continua a ter imensa. Graça mas ele pode fazer tudo o que? Quiser, não é? Pode. Chegou este mundo do mundo para poder fazer tudo. Sim, talvez não chegue a todas as gerações como chegava. Não é dantes. Eu lembro me, por exemplo, No No no célebre Sketch da da última ceia, não é? 49:20 Ele chegou a todas as gerações, houve umas gerações que odiaram isso foi incrível, eu adorei, eu adorei esse momento iá, e ele é também um dos meus heróis por causa desse momento, porque, porque, enfim, porque qual que lá está transgressor, perigoso artista? 49:38 O Herman é tudo isso sim. Pode a qualquer momento fazer dinamitar isto olha fora o humor, tu tens, posso chamar lhe maturidade emocional entre o felps e os infanticidas. O que, o que muda no teu olhar quando quando tu transpassas da comédia para, para, para o drama, o humor e a dor são são irmãos. 49:58 O sim, diria que sim, mas mais do que isso, é há coisas que me que me inquietam, não é? Eu com 41 anos e 3 filhos, EEE uma história já muito porreira. O que? É que te inquieta. Várias coisas. Olha esta coisa da do dos artistas, esta coisa da sociedade portuguesa, esta coisa de o que é que é ser português em 2025, o que é que é ter 41 anos em 2025? 50:21 A amizade, a amizade inquieta me há amigos que desaparecem e não é só porque morrem, há há. Há outros que desaparecem porque. Perdemos lhe o rasto. Ou isso, ou porque nos zangamos EEA coisa vai de vela e é assim. E a vida é dinâmica e. E às vezes questiono, me, não é? 50:37 Questiono me sobre quanto é que vale uma amizade, por exemplo, os enfatisídeos é sobre isso, não é? Ou seja, 22 amigos de 2 amigos de infância que aos 17 anos dizem, se aos 30 anos não estivermos a fazer aquilo que queremos fazer, matamo nos daquelas promessas adolescentes e de repente um deles apaixona se e casa se. 50:57 E ele às vezes não quer morrer e a amizade vai à vida. E aquele que ficou para sempre com 17 anos, que sou um bocado eu, não é? Porque eu acho os problemas aos 17 anos é que são os verdadeiros problemas da existência humana. Os outros são chatices da EDPE da epal estás a ver isso? São outros chatices pagar as contas, pagar contas é só isso, porque tudo o resto é só o que é que eu estou aqui a fazer? 51:17 Porque é que eu me apaixonei, porque é que ninguém gosta de mim, porque é que essas coisas são tão ricas, são tão boas de testemunhar eu tenho. Tenho um exemplo incrível de ter 11 filho extraordinário chamado Francisco, que tem 14 anos e que tem umas inquietações muito. 51:34 Muito boas pá, muito, muito poéticas, muito. É uma idade difícil. E boa. E tão boa. E tenho. Tenho muita sorte. Francisco é um miúdo incrível. Mas mesmo que não fosse, eu diria assim. Para ele e tu e tu estimulas ou acalmas as ânsias dele. Eu eu acho que sou eu e a mãe dele, acho que somos estimuladores da sua, das suas várias consciências, social, política, artística. 52:02 Mas temos uma, o respaldo que encontrámos naquele naquele ser humano, foi maior do que qualquer um incentivo que nós pudéssemos dar. Ou seja, nós lançámos um bocadinho, as paisadas para os pés dele e ele de repente floresceu. E é hoje em dia uma pessoa é um ser humano extraordinário e pronto. 52:19 E eu costumo dizer aos meus amigos que o primeiro filho muda a nossa vida, o segundo acaba com ela, uma terceira. Esta turística, sim, é pá. Eu acho que os 3 deram um cabo da minha vida. É uma dinâmica diferente, não é? 3. É, é ainda por cima estão os passados, não é? Um tem 14, outro tem 3, outro tem 1 ano e meio e para o ano provavelmente quero ter mais um filho, porque acho que é lá está eu estou com água, luz a tatuar aqui, algures, portanto, tu. 52:43 Vais salvar o nosso problema de de de naturalidade e demográfico. Eu espero que sim, eu já sou Oo chamado povoador dos olivais. Portanto, vão para sim, sim, olha o que é que te falta fazer para fecharmos o que é que anda o que é que andas a escrever o que é que anda, o que é que te anda a inquietar o que é que te anda aí a. 53:01 Debaixo do teu olho. Olha, estou concorri a uma bolsa para escrever um livro. Pode saber sobre o quê? Sim, sim, é um filme que eu não, que eu não tenho dinheiro para fazer e, portanto, vou fazer o livro. E depois pode ser que o livro reúna. E os bons livros dão sempre grandes filmes. 53:17 Ao contrário, os maus livros, eu sei que eu sei que vou ser fraquinha e, portanto, os maus livros dão bons filmes, os bons livros. Portanto, a tua expectativa é que o livro seja mau que é um grande filme? Sim, sim, não. Mas pelo menos seja seja livro. Isso é importante. Eu gosto imenso de livros. Gosto imenso de ler. É das coisas que eu mais gosto de fazer, é de ler. Fiz isso candidatei me EE. 53:33 Entretanto, estou a preparar uma série de outro género, completamente diferente, que é uma série de de fantástico de terror, escrita por 5 amigos, de que eu tenho muita estima. Por quem tenho muita estima, o Tiago r Santos Oo Artur, o Artur Ribeiro, o Luís Filipe Borges, o Nuno Duarte e o Filipe homem Fonseca. 53:51 Que é uma série chamada arco da velha, que terá estreia na RTPE, que se passa entre Portugal e a galiza e também vai ter uns toques de Brasil. E estou também a preparar outro projeto lá mais para a frente, que é provavelmente os projetos que eu mais quero fazer na vida até hoje, que estou a desenvolver com a Ana Lázaro, com a Gabriela Barros e com o Rui Melo. 54:13 É impossível falhar, já ganhaste. Completamente impossível falhar porque esta ideia original é da Gabriela e do Rui. Ei, e eles vieram ter comigo. E eu fiquei para já muito conten

LEVITICUS 6 — THE LAW OF ASHAM (GUILT & RESTORATION)“Restitution, Purity, and the Continual Fire of Yahuah”Teachers: Kerry & Karen BattleAhava ~ Love AssemblyToday's class dives into Leviticus 6 — The Law of Asham (Guilt Offering), where Yahuah reveals how broken trust, withheld restoration, and neglected fire threaten the entire covenant structure of Israel.This is not ritual.This is Yahuah's justice system.Leviticus 6 exposes the covenant breaches that demand confession, restitution, and priestly action:1. Lying or deceiving a neighbor (Lev 6:2)2. Stealing, extorting, or withholding property (Lev 6:2–3)3. Failing to return lost items (Lev 6:3–4)4. Breaking trust or violating agreements (Lev 6:2, 5)5. Neglecting the continual altar fire (Lev 6:9–13)6. Mishandling ashes and purity (Lev 6:10–11)7. Misusing what is qodesh in service (Lev 6:16–23)8. Ignoring vessel laws and boundary purity (Lev 6:28)Each trespass connects directly to Exodus 21–23, the backbone of Yahuah's justice architecture:Life is sacredProperty is protectedTestimony is bindingOaths are covenantalRestitution is requiredNegligence equals guiltSacred space must be guardedThe vulnerable must be defendedLeviticus 6 is the continuation of covenant justice — not a separate ritual.---

O arquivo do Matraquilhos está sempre disponível na íntegra na Oficina do Podcast mas as grandes plataformas agregadoras só mantêm os 300 episódios mais recentes. Num momento em que o podcast está na sua nona temporada e se aproxima dos 600 episódios, e após os pedidos e sugestões de alguns dos nossos ouvintes, decidimos criar uma nova rubrica de Best Of dos episódios do passado que já não estejam disponíveis tão facilmente.Apresentamo-vos então a Roleta, a rubrica onde damos a volta ao arquivo para republicar um episódio antigo. Sigam-nos também no canal Matraquilhos no whatsapp.

Korah's rebellion in Numbers 16 reveals the consequences of rejecting God's appointed authority. Though he was a Levite with sacred responsibilities, Korah desired the priesthood, a role God had not given him. His ambition led to destruction as “the ground opened and swallowed him and those who followed him alive” (Num 16:32–33). This account is not merely historical. Jude uses it to expose spiritual danger within the church, where some claim spiritual authority while resisting God's order. Jude identifies three […] The post Dead Religion: The Way of Korah appeared first on Revival Life Church Boca Raton, FL.

The story of Ruth begins with these words: In the days when the judges governed (v. 1a). Just before Joshua died after a lifetime of faithful service, he warned all of Israel: Now therefore fear the LORD and serve him in sincerity and faithfulness. Put away the gods your fathers served beyond the River and in Egypt, and serve the LORD. And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve... But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD. (Josh. 24:14-15) The book of Judges recounts Israels history shortly after entering the promised land, and just in the second chapter, we are told: Then the sons of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord and served the Baals, and they abandoned the Lord, the God of their fathers... (Jud. 2:11-12), which characterizes the tone and climate of Israels spiritual health. The book of Judges also concludes with the words: In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes (Jug. 21:25). While in the wilderness, God warned Israel that there would be consequences to their choices, especially when it came to their trust of God and obedience to God: Beware that your hearts are not easily deceived, and that you do not turn away and serve other gods, and worship them. Otherwise, the anger of the LORD will be kindled against you, and He will shut up the sky so that there will be no rain, and the ground will not yield its produce; then you will quickly perish from the good land which the LORD is giving you (Deut. 11:16-17) As we move from Judges into the book of Ruth, the opening five verses immediately shed light on the spiritual condition of Naomis husband, Elimelech. These verses reveal how Elimelech, in his role as both husband and father, deeply influenced the direction and well-being of his family. The famine in the land did not just reflect a lack of physical food; it also mirrored the spiritual famine within Elimelechs own heart and soul. There are some things I want to point out to you that I believe will help you appreciate just how relevant this book is to us today. First, let me begin by stating that Bethlehem means house of bread yet there was no bread in Bethlehem because there was famine in the land due to Israels disobedience. God had promised that He would bless His people if they obeyed Him, so the reason why there was no bread in Bethlehem was because of Israels unfaithfulness, not Gods unfaithfulness. Second, we are told that Elimelech was a man of Bethlehem in Judah..., which means that he belonged to the tribe of Judah. God called Elimelech to live in Bethlehem, yet he chose to move to Moab because he believed that he and his family could thrive in a place outside of where God called him to live. Some of the things that Elimelech had to know about Moab was that the people originated out of an incestuous relationship after Lots older daughter got him drunk for the purpose of having sex with her father so that she could become pregnant with his child (Gen. 19:30-38). Secondly, the Moabites were known for their scheming to get Israel to sin against God (Num. 22-24). Thirdly, the Women of Moab were known for seducing the Israelite men for the purpose of getting them to worship the gods of Moab (Num. 25). Moab was not a place for a family to thrive spiritually, but this is the place that Elimelech took his family to live. The other important detail we need to consider is that while Naomis name means Pleasant nothing about her life seemed pleasant. Her husbands name meant God is my king but he certainly did not live like God was his king. The meaning of the names of their two sons were, Mahlon (Weakness, sickness) and Chilion (destruction, failure); both men took for themselves Moabite women who did not grow up worshiping the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; taking Moabite women as wives was something God commanded Israel not to do (see Deut. 7:1-4). Noamis husband and both of her sons died, leaving her with nothing but two daughters-in-law who were also destitute with no husband or male child. Naomi Suffered Loss When Naomi left Bethlehem with her husband and two sons, she leftfull. Because of the famine in the land (v. 1), moving to Moab must have felt like the right decisionan act of survival for the sake of their family. But while in Moab, tragedy struck. Her husband, Elimelech, died. Then her two sons married Moabite women, Orpah and Ruthsomething God had warned His people against because of the danger of idolatry (Deut. 7:23). And after marrying these women, both of Naomis sons also died, leaving her with two widowed Moabite daughters-in-law and no descendants of her own. Naomi had lost the three most important men in her life, along with any hope of lineage, inheritance, or security. There was nothing for her in Moab, and because of her husbands death after leaving Bethlehem, there was nothing but maybe the kindness of her relatives back in Judah. So when she returned to Bethlehem, it is no surprise that she no longer wanted to be called Naomi, which means pleasant. She asked instead to be calledMara, meaning bitter. She explained the bitterness in her own words: The Almighty has dealt very bitterly with me. I went away full, and the LORD has brought me back empty (vv. 2021). Ruth: A Woman of Excellence Naomi failed to recognize the blessing her Moabite daughter-in-law truly was. When Naomi decided to return to Bethlehem, she urged both Orpah and Ruth to go back to their own people and gods in Moab. While Orpah left to go back to her people and her gods, Ruth decided to remain with Naomi and even declared to her mother-in-law: Do not plead with me to leave you or to turn back from following you; for where you go, I will go, and where you sleep, I will sleep. Your people shall be my people, and your God, my God. Where you die, I will die, and there I will be buried. May the LORD do so to me, and worse, if anything but death separates me from you. (1:1618). One reason Naomi discouraged Ruth from coming back with her was concern for Ruths safety. There was significant hostility between Moabites and Israelites. This is clear in chapter two, after Ruth entered a field belonging to Boaz. Everyone in the field knew Ruth was a foreigner, as the foreman explained to Boaz, She is the young Moabite woman who returned with Naomi from Moab. Boazs response reveals the real danger Ruth faced. He spoke kindly to her, saying, Listen carefully, my daughter. Do not go to glean in another field; furthermore, do not go on from this one, but join my young women here. Keep your eyes on the field which they reap, and go after them. Indeed, I have ordered the servants not to touch you. When you are thirsty, go to the water jars and drink from what the servants draw (Ruth 2:89). Ruths foreign status exposed her to rejection, prejudice, and mistreatmentyet she chose to stay with Naomi anyway, embracing uncertainty and risking lifelong exclusion. Her courage did not go unnoticed. In chapter three, Boaz calls Ruth a woman of excellence (3:11)a term that carries the sense of valor, honor, and strength of character. Remarkably, the same word is used of Boaz in 2:1, while you do not see it in the way the NASB translated Ruth 2:1, just about every other translation does recognize this: Now Naomi had a relative of her husbands, a worthy man of the clan of Elimelech, whose name was Boaz. The parallel is deliberate. The narrator wants us to see that Ruth and Boaz are kindred spiritstwo people marked by integrity, bravery, and covenant faithfulness in a time when such qualities were rare in Israel. Boaz: A Kinsmen Redeemer Boaz is the third important character in the story of Ruth, for he is the only one qualified to serve as Naomis kinsman-redeemer. Every kinsman-redeemer had to meet three qualifications: He had to be a family member, He had to have the ability to redeem, and He had to be willing to redeem. A kinsman-redeemer held several responsibilities in the Old Testament: he could buy back family land lost to famine or debt (Lev. 25:2530), redeem relatives who had sold themselves into slavery (Lev. 25:4755), avenge the unlawful death of a family member (Num. 35; Deut. 19; Josh. 20), and step in when a family member faced a wrong they could not fix on their own. Naomi needed that kind of help. She had lost her husband and both sons. She had no land, no security, and no hope. Ruth could not redeem her, so she went out to glean in the fieldsa provision God had given for the poor and the foreigner (Lev. 19:910). Thats where we first meet Boaz. He told Ruth, Do not go to another field I have ordered the young men not to touch you (Ruth 2:89). Ruth bowed in gratitude, asking why he would show kindness to a foreigner. Boaz told her he had heard of her loyalty to Naomi and her trust in Israels God (2:1113). He saw Ruth as a woman of excellenceworthy of honor and protection. When Naomi learned how Boaz treated Ruth, she urged Ruth to approach him at the threshing floor. Though the scene might look questionable at first glance, Ruth 3:613 makes it clear: both Ruth and Boaz acted with purity and integrity. Ruth lay quietly at his feet, and when Boaz awoke, she said, Spread your wings over your servant, for you are a redeemer. She wasnt tempting himshe was invoking covenant language, the same wings imagery Boaz used earlier of the LORDs care (see 2:12). Boaz responded with joy: I will do all that you ask, for everyone knows you are a worthy woman (3:11). He was both willing and able to redeem her. And he did. So Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife. And he went in to her, and the Lord gave her conception, and she bore a son (4:13). Through Boaz, Naomis emptiness was replaced with joy, and Ruth was blessed with a godly husband and a son. The women of the town celebrated: Then the women said to Naomi, Blessed is the Lord who has not left you without a redeemer today, and may his name become famous in Israel. May he also be to you one who restores life and sustains your old age; for your daughter-in-law, who loves you and is better to you than seven sons, has given birth to him. Then Naomi took the child and laid him in her lap, and became his nurse. And the neighbor women gave him a name, saying, A son has been born to Naomi! So they named him Obed. He is the father of Jesse, the father of David. (4:14-17) What began in sorrow ended in joy. What started with loss ended in redemption. God used a barley field, a faithful woman, and a willing redeemer to bring about His plannot just for Naomi and Ruth, but through Boaz and Ruth the line of the kings would come with the birth of David by whom all other kings would be compared in Israel. This leaves us with the point of this little book in the Bible. There is a True and Better Redeemer Boaz was not only Naomis redeemerhe was also a picture of the Redeemer who would one day come through his and Ruths own bloodline. Boaz was only a shadow of a true and better Boaz. Remember the announcement of Jesus birth delivered by the angels to lowly shepherds: And so the angel said to them, Do not be afraid; for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will be for all the people; for today in the city of David [Bethlehem] there has been born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord (Luke 2:10-11). It was the disobedience of Israel that led to the famine that compelled Naomis husband and sons to leave where there was no bread to a place that led to a deeper and more severe famine that left Naomi empty. God used all of the hard things in Naomis life so that another Son would be born in that same city to do what no other person was able to do; Jesus said of Himself: I am the bread of life; the one who comes to Me will not be hungry, and the one who believes in Me will never be thirsty (John 6:35). When Adam and Eve bit into the forbidden fruit, creation was cursed and humanity was lost. Eden was forfeited, and mankind was expelled from Gods presence. The only way for Eden to be restored and the curse removed was for another Adam to comeone who was related to humanity, who had the ability to redeem what was lost, and who was willing to carry out the redemption. Ruth and Boaz had a son named Obed; Obed fathered Jesse; Jesse fathered David. Many generations later, Jesus was born to Maryconceived supernaturally while she remained a virginqualifying Him uniquely as the Kinsman-Redeemer mankind and creation needs. How was Jesus qualified? Jesus had to be a family member of humanity, and He was, as demonstrated by the human bloodline recorded in Scripture. Jesus had to have the ability to redeem, which He had because the virgin birth made Him both fully God and fully manperfectly qualified to redeem creation. Jesus had to be willing to redeem, and that willingness led Him to the cross, where He became our curse and took our sin upon Himself. Jesus did not remain dead. On the third day He rose in victory! Our Kinsman-Redeemer lived the perfect life we could not live, died as the sin-bearer though He was spotless, and then conquered death itself. All of heaven rejoices that the Redeemer who was slain now standsaliveinterceding for us: Worthy are You to take the scroll and to break its seals, for You were slaughtered, and You purchased people for God with Your blood from every tribe, language, people, and nation. You have made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they will reign upon the earth (Rev. 5:910). And maybe thats where you need hope today. Perhaps you are living with the consequences of choices you made years ago. Perhaps bitterness has taken root because life did not turn out the way you imagined. Perhaps, like Naomis family, you have wandered far into Moabfar from God, far from joy, far from where you began. But hear the good news:the book of Ruth declares that no one is too far for Gods love, grace, and mercy to reach. If God can take a famine, a foreigner, and a broken widow and weave them into the lineage of King David and ultimately Jesus Christ HimselfHe can redeem your story too!

Num 23:19; Jn 1:18; Jn 20:29; Heb 11:1; Heb 11:6; Eph 2:8; 2Cor 5:7; Phil 2:5; Rom 1:20Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/what-jesus-says--4116133/support.

LEVITICUS 5 — THE LAW OF ASHAM (TRESPASS)“Accountability, Restoration, and the Fear of Yahuah”Teachers: Kerry & Karen BattleAhava ~ Love AssemblyToday's class dives into Leviticus 5 — The Law of Asham (Trespass), where Yahuah reveals how hidden guilt, broken oaths, and neglected responsibility fracture covenant order.This is not ritual.This is Yahuah's justice system.Leviticus 5 exposes the five forms of trespass that demand confession and restitution:1. Withholding truth (Lev 5:1)2. Touching death unknowingly (Lev 5:2–3)3. Rash or impulsive oaths (Lev 5:4–5)4. Misusing what is qodesh (Lev 5:15–16)5. Sin done in ignorance (Lev 5:17–19)Each connects directly to Exodus 21–23, the backbone of Yahuah's justice architecture:Life is sacredProperty is protectedTestimony is bindingOaths are covenantalRestitution is requiredNegligence equals guiltThe vulnerable must be defendedLeviticus 5 is the continuation of covenant justice — not a separate ritual.

Wesley Wright Lighthouse Bible Church Sunday, November 16, 2025 Ye are holy unto the Lord Ezr 8:1-36 Remember from last week: Artaxerxes gave full support to the work Ezra is coming to Babylon to set things in order Ezra is part of a second group leaving Babylon for Jerusalem Ezr 8:1-13 lists the families that went up with Ezra in the second wave to Jerusalem. No Levites in the group (Ezr 8:15) is a big deal. Ezra, as a reminder, was a part of the Levitical priesthood. Neh 12:1-7 Levites alone had the responsibility of maintaining temple operations. All priests were Levites, but not all Levites were priests. Num 1:47-54 Deu... for full notes: http://www.lbible.org/index.php?proc=msg&sf=vw&tid=1763

The Suffering of the Psalmist      The Psalmist wrote, “Before I was afflicted, I went astray, but now I keep Your word” (Psa 119:67). The word translated “went astray” is שָׁגַג (shāgag). According to HALOT it means “to make a mistake inadvertently, unwittingly…to go astray.”[1] It connotes moral or spiritual deviation (cf. Prov 5:23; Isa 53:6). Ross states, “The verb (שָׁגגַ) is used in Leviticus for unintentional sins; but here it probably includes rationalized, deliberate sins because he was wandering from the way of God. He was not walking by faith in obedience to the word, and so he suffered some affliction at the hands of the wicked; but now he was keeping God's oracle, the word “keep” (שָׁמַר) referring to a meticulous observance of all that God required in his covenant.”[2] The significance is that the psalmist admits he was drifting from obedience, not necessarily into outright rebellion, but into carelessness or neglect of God's Word. The affliction became God's means of correction, turning his wandering into renewed obedience. Thus, the term highlights human tendency to stray and God's faithful use of discipline to restore. A few verses later he states, “It is good for me that I was afflicted, so that I may learn Your statutes” (Psa 119:71). Affliction is seen as a teacher that drives God's people back to His Word. Ross adds, “The psalmist is able to acknowledge that his affliction worked for his good because it forced him to learn more of God's plan revealed in his word. In learning through adversity, he discovered the word God personally revealed in human language was far more valuable than silver or gold [Psa 119:72].”[3] Then, the psalmist states, “I know, O LORD, that Your judgments are righteous, and that in faithfulness You have afflicted me” (Psa 119:75). Ross states: "The affliction he has been experiencing came from God, even though it was through arrogant oppressors. The principle was laid down in the experience of Israel in the wilderness: God tested them to see if they would obey or not (Deut 8:16). Those who understand the ways of God know that ultimately it is his plan to exalt the righteous and destroy the wicked, but that in his wisdom he often humbles the righteous before exalting them."[4]      Taken together, these verses trace the movement from wandering, to correction, to obedience, and finally to worshipful recognition of God's faithful purposes. They teach that affliction, far from being wasted, is a tool in God's hand to sanctify His people and anchor them more firmly in His Word. We don't like trials or suffering, and we often ask God to remove them, much like Paul asked God to remove his “thorn in the flesh” (2 Cor 12:7). However, we find that most of the time God chooses not to remove our difficulty, like He did not remove Paul's (2 Cor 12:8-9), and we must learn that what He does not remove, He intends for us to deal with, and this by faith (2 Cor 12:10; cf. 2 Cor 5:7; Heb 10:38; 11:6). The Suffering of Joseph      Joseph's life stands as one of Scripture's clearest demonstrations of how God employs suffering to shape the faith and character of His people. Betrayed by his brothers and cast into a pit, Joseph was sold into slavery and carried away to Egypt (Gen 37:23–28). There he endured the humiliation of serving as a foreigner in Potiphar's house, and though he prospered by God's favor, his integrity in resisting Potiphar's wife led to false accusations and unjust imprisonment (Gen 39:1–20). Even in prison, where he was forgotten by those he had helped (Gen 40:23), Joseph displayed remarkable faithfulness, refusing bitterness and maintaining trust in God's providential hand. Each stage of his trial pressed him deeper into dependence upon the Lord, refining his character for the weighty responsibilities that awaited him. His hardships were not incidental but instrumental in God's design, preparing him to serve as second only to Pharaoh and to become a channel of blessing to countless lives.      Joseph consistently interpreted his life from the perspective of God's providence, not merely in the well-known statement of Genesis 50:20. When he first revealed himself to his brothers, he sought to comfort them with the assurance that their sin, though grievous, was under divine control: “Do not be grieved or angry with yourselves, because you sold me here, for God sent me before you to preserve life” (Gen 45:5). He went further, declaring, “God sent me before you to preserve for you a remnant on the earth, and to keep you alive by a great deliverance. Now, therefore, it was not you who sent me here, but God” (Gen 45:7–8). In both statements, Joseph acknowledged the reality of human betrayal but deliberately framed it within the larger purposes of God. He viewed his sufferings as divine instruments for the preservation of life and the fulfillment of covenantal promises.      Later, after Jacob's death, Joseph's brothers again feared retaliation, but Joseph reaffirmed the same perspective, saying: “You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive” (Gen 50:20). This statement serves as the theological climax of his narrative, demonstrating how God overruled human evil for His own purposes. According to Radmacher, “God works His good plan even through the evil plans of evil people. Even the worst events can be used in the hand of kindly Providence for His good.”[5] Even at the end of his life, Joseph's confidence remained fixed on God's providence. Altogether, Joseph voiced this divine perspective at least four times (Gen 45:5; 45:7–8; 50:20; 50:24–25), revealing a mature faith that consistently interpreted suffering through the lens of God's sovereign care. The Suffering of Moses      Moses' life reveals how God employs prolonged suffering and repeated trials to shape His servants into men of spiritual depth and usefulness. After killing the Egyptian, Moses fled into exile, spending forty years in Midian as a shepherd (Ex 2:15–25). This season of obscurity was not wasted but was God's classroom for humility and preparation. Though Moses had been educated in all the wisdom of Egypt (Acts 7:22), he needed the quiet discipline of the desert to unlearn self-reliance and to grow in patience and dependence on God. The Lord used these years of hiddenness to refine his character and to equip him with the endurance necessary for leading Israel. This long exile reminds believers that God often uses seasons of difficulty, waiting, and obscurity as essential training grounds for future service. Moses would later emerge not as the impulsive prince of Egypt but as the meek servant whom God could use to shepherd His people. Wiersbe states: "The man who was “mighty in word and deed” is now in the lowly pastures taking care of stubborn sheep, but that was just the kind of preparation he needed for leading a nation of stubborn people. Israel was God's special flock (Psa 100:3) and Moses His chosen shepherd. Like Joseph's thirteen years as a slave in Egypt and Paul's three years' hiatus after his conversion (Gal 1:16-17), Moses' forty years of waiting and working prepared him for a lifetime of faithful ministry. God doesn't lay hands suddenly on His servants but takes time to equip them for their work."[6]      When God called Moses to return to Egypt, the trials intensified. He faced the hardened opposition of Pharaoh (Ex 5–12), who resisted every divine demand, bringing repeated conflict and mounting pressure. Beyond this, Moses bore the weight of constant complaints from the Israelites themselves, who murmured against him at the Red Sea and in the wilderness over water and food (Ex 14–17). Such trials might have broken a lesser man, but through them God deepened Moses' humility and dependence. Scripture later records that “the man Moses was very humble, more than any man who was on the face of the earth” (Num 12:3). His humility came as he suffered hardship—first in Midian's solitude, then in Pharaoh's defiance, and finally in Israel's stubbornness. Each trial stripped Moses of self-confidence and taught him to rest in God's power and presence. Thus, Moses' life illustrates that suffering, though painful, is God's tool to produce humility, endurance, and spiritual maturity in His people, preparing them for greater responsibility and usefulness in His service. The pathway to spiritual maturity sometimes runs though the valley of hardship and suffering. Steven R. Cook, D.Min., M.Div.   [1] Ludwig Koehler et al., The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1994–2000), 1412. [2] Allen P. Ross, A Commentary on the Psalms (90–150): Commentary, vol. 3, 523. [3] Ibid., 524–525. [4] Ibid., 529. [5] Earl D. Radmacher, Ronald Barclay Allen, and H. Wayne House, Nelson's New Illustrated Bible Commentary (Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers, 1999), 83. [6] Warren Wiersbe, The Bible Exposition Commentary, Vol. 1, 182-183.

Num semana de assombramentos, o Conselho Geral da UGT decidiu, por unanimidade, avançar para uma greve geral, em conjunto com a CGTP, marcada para 11 de dezembro. Isto apesar de o processo negocial do pacote laboral, na Concertação Social, não ter terminado. Mas parece que as negociações bateram de frente num muro inflexível do governo. Esta será a quarta greve geral em Portugal desde o 25 de abril. Todas por causa de alterações às leis laborais. No caso Epstein, foram reveladas novas mensagens que mostram que Trump está afinal mais envolvido do que tem admitido. A operação Influencer atormenta o procurador-geral da República, Amadeu Guerra, que deu informações incorretas sobre um acórdão que já está fechado. São estes os temas do Eixo do Mal, em podcast, com Clara Ferreira Alves e Luís Pedro Nunes, Daniel Oliveira e Pedro Marques Lopes. Emitido na SIC Notícias a 13 de novembro. Para ver a versão vídeo deste episódio clique aquiSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Novembre 2025 - Numéro 70 : ・Les nouvelles de l'équipe ・Les sujets d'actualité : Les ours, la fin des Super Sentai, naissance des bébés étrangers, etc. ・Les recommandations L'équipe Gaijin San : Vincent (@Vince_Tokyo), Nicolas (@Ryo_Saeba_3) et Amaury

Gilles Babinet, multi-entrepreneur, président de Café IA et ancien président du Conseil National du Numérique, est une figure incontournable pour décrypter les enjeux numériques européens. J'ai la chance de connaître Gilles depuis près de 15 ans et, à chaque conversation, je suis toujours frappé par la richesse de sa pensée et la profondeur de ses analyses. Il a ce talent rare de rendre limpide des sujets complexes, sans jamais céder à la facilité ni au sensationnalisme.Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons ensemble dans une réflexion aussi essentielle qu'urgente : celle de la souveraineté numérique. En tant qu'Européens, nous utilisons massivement des services américains ou chinois – des réseaux sociaux à l'IA en passant par le cloud – sans toujours saisir les implications profondes que cela entraîne sur notre liberté de penser, notre démocratie et notre modèle de société.J'ai questionné Gilles sur des sujets qui me tiennent à cœur : la domination des plateformes, le rôle des IA génératives dans la manipulation de l'opinion, le techno-féodalisme, l'inaction européenne, mais aussi les possibles voies de résistance. Nous avons parlé des alternatives européennes, de la culture du risque, de la productivité réelle de l'IA mais également du paradoxe de Solow.C'est un épisode dense, sans concession, mais qui propose aussi des pistes de solutions concrètes. Parce qu'il ne s'agit pas seulement de critiquer, mais de reprendre le contrôle de notre destin technologique. Bonne écoute !5 citations marquantes“La technologie est le nerf invisible de la puissance.”“Si on ne fait rien, l'Europe disparaîtra en tant qu'acteur numérique.”“Les réseaux sociaux nous contaminent avec la vision du monde de leurs créateurs.”“L'IA n'est pas neutre, elle a une induction programmée.”“Faire, même crado, vaut mieux qu'un rêve parfait.”10 questions posées pendant l'interviewPourquoi l'Europe a-t-elle perdu la course au numérique ?Qu'est-ce que la souveraineté numérique, concrètement ?Comment les réseaux sociaux influencent-ils nos démocraties ?En quoi l'IA aggrave-t-elle ces enjeux ?Peut-on encore construire des alternatives européennes crédibles ?Que révèle le cas Spotify sur nos usages numériques ?Pourquoi les médias deviennent-ils eux aussi “putaclic” ?Comment développer une culture numérique populaire en Europe ?Quel est l'impact réel de l'IA sur la productivité ?L'IA va-t-elle vraiment remplacer massivement les emplois ?Timestamps clés 00:00 – Introduction sur la vassalisation numérique de l'Europe02:15 – Le parcours atypique de Gilles Babinet, autodidacte04:00 – Qu'est-ce que la souveraineté numérique ?08:30 – Trump, Microsoft et les risques de dépendance géopolitique13:30 – L'impact cognitif des réseaux sociaux17:30 – Peut-on concilier démocratie et IA ?20:00 – TikTok et la manipulation électorale24:00 – Le paradoxe de nos choix technologiques (cloud, IA)29:00 – Pourquoi l'Europe n'a pas de champions numériques ?34:00 – IA et productivité : déconstruire les fantasmes42:00 – L'Europe : autostoppeur ou puissance d'avenir ? Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : #348 I.A. entre mythes et réalités avec Tariq Krim (partie 1) (https://audmns.com/cNpkHUt) #302 Quand la technologie se transforme en arme de guerre avec Asma Mhalla (https://audmns.com/oBtUPgb) #178 Les technologies vont-elles nous permettre de faire face au défi climatique? avec Philippe Bihouix (https://audmns.com/ktZSlzb)Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Gilles Babinet, multi-entrepreneur, président de Café IA et ancien président du Conseil National du Numérique, est une figure incontournable pour décrypter les enjeux numériques européens. J'ai la chance de connaître Gilles depuis près de 15 ans et, à chaque conversation, je suis toujours frappé par la richesse de sa pensée et la profondeur de ses analyses. Il a ce talent rare de rendre limpide des sujets complexes, sans jamais céder à la facilité ni au sensationnalisme.Dans cet épisode, nous plongeons ensemble dans une réflexion aussi essentielle qu'urgente : celle de la souveraineté numérique. En tant qu'Européens, nous utilisons massivement des services américains ou chinois – des réseaux sociaux à l'IA en passant par le cloud – sans toujours saisir les implications profondes que cela entraîne sur notre liberté de penser, notre démocratie et notre modèle de société.J'ai questionné Gilles sur des sujets qui me tiennent à cœur : la domination des plateformes, le rôle des IA génératives dans la manipulation de l'opinion, le techno-féodalisme, l'inaction européenne, mais aussi les possibles voies de résistance. Nous avons parlé des alternatives européennes, de la culture du risque, de la productivité réelle de l'IA mais également du paradoxe de Solow.C'est un épisode dense, sans concession, mais qui propose aussi des pistes de solutions concrètes. Parce qu'il ne s'agit pas seulement de critiquer, mais de reprendre le contrôle de notre destin technologique. Bonne écoute !5 citations marquantes“La technologie est le nerf invisible de la puissance.”“Si on ne fait rien, l'Europe disparaîtra en tant qu'acteur numérique.”“Les réseaux sociaux nous contaminent avec la vision du monde de leurs créateurs.”“L'IA n'est pas neutre, elle a une induction programmée.”“Faire, même crado, vaut mieux qu'un rêve parfait.”10 questions posées pendant l'interviewPourquoi l'Europe a-t-elle perdu la course au numérique ?Qu'est-ce que la souveraineté numérique, concrètement ?Comment les réseaux sociaux influencent-ils nos démocraties ?En quoi l'IA aggrave-t-elle ces enjeux ?Peut-on encore construire des alternatives européennes crédibles ?Que révèle le cas Spotify sur nos usages numériques ?Pourquoi les médias deviennent-ils eux aussi “putaclic” ?Comment développer une culture numérique populaire en Europe ?Quel est l'impact réel de l'IA sur la productivité ?L'IA va-t-elle vraiment remplacer massivement les emplois ?Timestamps clés 00:00 – Introduction sur la vassalisation numérique de l'Europe02:15 – Le parcours atypique de Gilles Babinet, autodidacte04:00 – Qu'est-ce que la souveraineté numérique ?08:30 – Trump, Microsoft et les risques de dépendance géopolitique13:30 – L'impact cognitif des réseaux sociaux17:30 – Peut-on concilier démocratie et IA ?20:00 – TikTok et la manipulation électorale24:00 – Le paradoxe de nos choix technologiques (cloud, IA)29:00 – Pourquoi l'Europe n'a pas de champions numériques ?34:00 – IA et productivité : déconstruire les fantasmes42:00 – L'Europe : autostoppeur ou puissance d'avenir ?Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

When Moses was born the Hebrew people had been living in Egypt for quite a time. Initially under the protection of Joseph and Pharoah and welcomed as honored guests; they had become an oppressed and enslaved nation. Fearing their growing strength, Pharaoh ordered every Hebrew boy to be thrown into the Nile. But one mothers courage defied the kings decree. She hid her child as long as she could, then placed him in a basket coated with tar and pitch and set him afloat on the Nile river. By Gods providence, Pharaohs daughter found the baby and raised him as her own. Moses grew up amid the luxury of Pharaohs court, yet he never forgot his Hebrew roots. His passion for justiceand his temperwould define much of his life. When he saw an Egyptian beating a Hebrew slave, Moses struck down the oppressor and hid the body in the sand (Exod. 2:1112). When the act became known, he fled to the wilderness of Midian, where he spent forty years as a shepherd, husband, and son-in-law to Jethrowaiting for the day when God would call him to lead His people out of bondage. By the time we reach Exodus 3, Moses had already spent those forty years in Midian tending sheep. Then, before a burning bush, he encountered the living Godthe God of Adam and Eve, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. God entered into Moses world in such a way that he would never be the same again. When God called to him from the bush, He said,Do not come near here; remove your sandals from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground(v. 5). What made the ground holy? The presence of God made it holy. As R.C. Sproul wrote in his classicThe Holiness of God: God alone is holy in Himself. Only God can sanctify something else. Only God can give the touch that changes it from the commonplace to something special, different, and apart. The God who spoke to Moses from within the burning bush is not only holybut faithful. While many Hebrews believed that God had forgotten them, the Lord reminded Moses that He is not only all-seeing, but full of mercy:I have certainly seen the oppression of My people who are in Egypt, and have heard their outcry because of their taskmasters, for I am aware of their sufferings(v. 7). Then God said to Moses,And now come, and I will send you to Pharaoh, so that you may bring My people, the sons of Israel, out of Egypt(v. 10). To this, Moses humbly replied,Who am I, that I should go to Pharaoh, and that I should bring the sons of Israel out of Egypt? All that Moses saw in himself was his own failures and weaknesses. But for God, it didnt matter how weak Moses was, for He delights to use the foolish to shame the wise and the weak to shame the strong (1 Cor. 1:2631). What the burning bush reminds us of is not only that God is holy, or that He is omniscient, or that He is faithful to His promises, but that God uses people not because He needs to, but because He wants to. Just as God did not need Noah or Joseph to address the problems of the world, He did not need Moses. The marvel of the story of God and the people He chooses to use has more to do with that fact that He invites people like us into His mission and the story He is telling. There is a Mediator Who Stands in Your Place After God revealed Himself to Moses as Yahwehthe covenant-keeping GodHe commissioned Moses to return to Egypt. Understandably, Moses questioned,Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?God assured him,I will certainly be with you(Exod. 3:1012). And when Moses was to speak to the people of Israel, God instructed him to say,I AM WHO I AM has sent me to you(v. 14). One of the characteristics that distinguishes the God of Abraham from the gods of Egypt is His faithfulnessHe keeps His promises. This is expressed beautifully inExodus 6:25, where God tells Moses,I am the LORD. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself fully known to them. I also established my covenant with them to give them the land of Canaan, where they resided as foreigners. Moreover, I have heard the groaning of the Israelites, whom the Egyptians are enslaving, and I have remembered my covenant.Gods faithfulness is not only in His name but in His actions, His compassion, and His unwavering remembrance of His promises. Do you remember Leahthe ugly wife whom Jacob did not love? Not only was Judah born to her, but so was Levi. About five generations later, we read inExodus 2:1of a man from the house of Levi who married a daughter of Levi. Together they had three children: Miriam, Aaron, and Moses. It was after Miriam and Aarons birthbut before Moses was bornthat Pharaoh commanded every Hebrew son to be thrown into the Nile (seeExod. 1:2022). Yet from this very family, God raised up the leaders who would deliver His people. Moses would lead Israel out of bondage, serving as a type of king who would shepherd Gods people through the wilderness. Aaron would become Gods priest, and through him the priestly line would continue (Exod. 28:129:9). Miriam would be identified as a prophetess (Exod. 15:2021). Dont miss this: God used all threeMoses, Aaron, and Miriamto lead His people out of Egypt, yet Aaron and Miriam would serve the people under Moses leadership (see Mic. 6:4). But it was to Moses, that God said, I have made you as God to Pharaoh, and your brother Aaron shall be your prophet. And when Miriam and Aaron forgot their place and Moses God-ordained role before Israel, God said, Now hear My words: If there is a prophet among you, I, the Lord, will make Myself known to him in a vision. I will speak with him in a dream. It is not this way for My servant Moses; He is faithful in all My household; with him I speak mouth to mouth, that is, openly, and not using mysterious language, and he beholds the form of the Lord. So why were you not afraid to speak against My servant, against Moses? (see Num. 12:1-8). Follow the Deliverer Who Leads His People Out of Bondage Moses stood before Pharaoh and Israel as a type ofshepherd-kinga mediator and prophet who spoke on Gods behalf. Listen to how the Lord described Moses role: As for you, you shall speak all that I command you, and your brother Aaron shall speak to Pharaoh that he let the sons of Israel go out of his land. But I will harden Pharaohs heart, so that I may multiply My signs and My wonders in the land of Egypt. When Pharaoh does not listen to you, I will lay My hand on Egypt and bring out My armies, My people the sons of Israel, from the land of Egypt by great judgments. Then the Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I extend My hand over Egypt and bring out the sons of Israel from their midst. (Exod. 7:2-5). When Moses and Aaron appeared before Pharaoh, they declared, Thus says the LORD, Let My people go. (Exod. 5:1). Pharaoh not only refused but mocked the God of Israel: Who is the Lord that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know the Lord, and besides, I will not let Israel go (5:1-2). To prove that no one would command Pharoah of Egypt, he made the Israelites labor even harsher, forcing them to gather their own straw while maintaining the same quota of bricks. What followed was asuccession of ten plagues, each designed to expose the impotence of Egypts gods and, in many cases, tomock them directly. The first nine fall naturally into three escalating triads: Plagues of defilement:water turned to blood (7:1424), frogs overran the land (8:115), and gnats or lice tormented Egypt (8:1619). Plagues of destruction:swarms of flies invaded (8:2032); disease killed Egypts livestock while Israels remained unharmed (9:17); and boils afflicted people and animals alike (9:812). Plagues of devastation:hail mixed with fire ravaged the land (9:1335); locusts devoured the remaining crops (10:120); and darknessa direct assault onRa, the sun-godcovered Egypt for three days (10:2129). Each judgment demonstrated Yahwehs sovereignty, yet Pharaohs heart only grew harder. Enraged, he shouted to Moseswho stood before himas Gods representative: Get away from me! Be careful, do not see my face again, for on the day you see my face, you shall die! (10:28). The cognitive dissonance of Pharaoh towards the God of the Israel was not only irrational, but insane! He was dealing with the God who He could not defeat, for in the words of the apostle Paul, it was the equivalent of the clay pot accusing the potter that He had no rights over what He created (Rom. 9:19ff.). In essence, Pharaohs heart cried out to the God of Moses,Who are You to tell me what I can and cannot do? Before we shake our heads or point our finger at Pharaoh in disgust, we must ask ourselves:What has God commanded us to release or submit to that we have resisted with the same question Who is Yahweh that I should obey His voice? Live in the Victory of the Lamb Who Triumphed Over Every Power Before the final plague, Israel was commanded to take amale lamb without defectand keep it forfour dayslong enough to confirm it was spotless and long enough for it to become, in a sense,theirlamb (Exod. 12:16). On the fourteenth day, the lamb was to be slaughtered at twilight, and its blood applied on the two doorposts and on the lintel of the houses in which they eat it (v. 7). Afterward, the entire household was toeat the lamb together(vv. 811). For what purpose was the perfect and spotless lamb slaughtered? We are told why in Exodus 12:12, For I will go through the land of Egypt on that night, and fatally strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the human firstborn to animals; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgmentsI am the Lord. Who would God strike? Thefirstborn sonsboth human and animaland thegods (elohim) of Egypt. These gods were not merely lifeless idols butspiritual powers, demonic forces that animated Egypts sorcery and who also held Pharaoh and his people captive[1] (see Deut. 32:17; 1 Cor. 10:2022).[2] So what fueled Pharaohs hatred of Yahweh and his oppression of Israel? His sin and pride, certainlybut beneath that rebellion lay ademonic conflict. The showdown between Moses and Pharaoh, Israel and Egypt, was not merely political or personal; it wasspiritual warfare. As Paul later wrote, For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places (Eph. 6:12). Every plague before the tenth was a call to repentancea chance for Pharaoh, for Egypt, and even for any Hebrew who had turned to Egypts idols, to turn back to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But only throughthe blood of the lambwould anyone experience deliverance and victory. But, why the firstborn? At the summit of Egypts pantheon stoodRa (Re), the so-called god of gods, depicted with thehead of a falconand thesolar disk encircled by a cobraa symbol of divine power and kingship. Pharaoh was worshiped as theson of Ra, and his ownfirstborn sonwas regarded as the next embodiment of divine rule. In one decisive act, Yahweh crushed the head of Egypts god for the purpose of liberating captive Israel and any Egyptian who wished to turn to the true Creator, and He did it through the blood of the lamb! Conclusion Through this series, youve been reminded of thetrue and better Adamwho embraced a tree for our redemption and life. Youve seen thetrue and better Isaac, who carried His cross to the place of execution for sins we committed, that we might become children of God through His willing death. There is atrue and better Israel, who pursued the unfaithful bride and redeemed her to be clothed in white, never again enslaved to sin. And there is atrue and better Mosesthe Prophet who perfectly represents God, the High Priest who intercedes for us, and the flawless Shepherd-King whose lordship demands our obedience. Behind Egypts gods stood a master deceiverthe father of lies, the ancient serpentwho twists truth and opposes the purposes of God. When Moses stood before Pharaoh, he wasnt merely confronting a ruler; he was standing against the spiritual powers of darkness. In that moment, Moses foreshadowed the One who would intercede perfectly on our behalf. Jesus is the true and better Mosesthe long-promised Deliverer, the Lion of Judah who became the Lamb of God to set captives free. He alone is the sinless Son of the Father, who took on flesh and dwelt among usthe Lamb who takes away the sin of the world. But His death did more than address our guilt; ittriumphed over sin, death, and every power opposed to Gods kingdom. Through His cross and resurrection, Jesus destroyed the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil (Heb. 2:14), and the works of the devil (1 John 3:8). When we turn to the book of Revelation, we witness a dramatic, global reenactment of the Exodus story: the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls each unleash escalating judgments, echoing the plagues that struck Egypt. Yet, just as Pharaoh stubbornly hardened his heart, so too does humanity in the final days. Scripture warns, The rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not repent of the works of their hands; they continued to worship demons and idols of gold, silver, brass, stone, and woodidols that can neither see, hear, nor walk. They refused to repent of their murders, their sorceries, their sexual immorality, or their thefts (Rev. 9:20-21). So we must ask regarding ourselves: Who is Yahweh that I should obey Him? Thetrue and better Moses, theLamb of God, was slain to liberate us from such things. For the true Christian,Colossians 2:1315declares our victory: And when you were dead in your wrongdoings and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our wrongdoings, having canceled the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. When He had disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public display of them, having triumphed over them through Him. (Col. 2:13-15) If you are in Christ, your victory and freedom are found inthe Lamb who reigns as the Lion of Judah. Jesus is the true and better Mediator who stands in your place. Jesus is the true and better Deliverer who leads His people out of bondage. The true Son of God is your salvationbefore whom every ruler and demon, all who are rich and poor, those who are known and unknown will one day bow. And on that Day, mayRevelation 12:1011be said of you: Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, Now the salvation, and the power, and the kingdom of our God and the authority of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brothers and sisters has been thrown down, the one who accuses them before our God day and night. And they overcame him because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life even when faced with death. (Rev. 12:10-11) [1] And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they will not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (2 Cor. 4:3-4) [2] No, but I say that things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God; and I do not want you to become partners with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? We are not stronger than He, are we? (1 Cor. 10:20-22)

PSALMS 79–81 — THE CRY, THE VINE, THE VOICETeacher: Kerry Battle | Ahava ~ Love AssemblyThis threefold psalm scroll traces Israel's journey from ruin to restoration.Psalm 79 cries for cleansing.Psalm 80 pleads for the Vine of Yahuah to be restored.Psalm 81 calls the nation back to the Voice of Covenant.It's a prophetic pattern for every generation:Cry → Restore → Remember.Forgetfulness breeds rebellion, but remembrance keeps fellowship.0:00 – Introduction — The Cry and the Covenant3:15 – Psalm 79 — The Cry for Cleansing8:45 – Psalm 80 — The Vine Restored14:10 – Psalm 81 — The Voice of Covenant21:00 – Application — Today's Priesthood: Cry, Intercede, Return, Guard, Renew26:30 – Final Heart Check — Remember and Walk in ShalomPsalms 79–81 | Deut 32 : 15–21 | Num 6 : 25 | Ex 15 : 17 | Deut 6 : 5 | John 15 : 1–2 | Col 3 : 16 | John 14 : 15The Cry of Repentance — When Grief Becomes IntercessionThe Vine of Yahuah — Planted for Fruit, Not FameThe Voice of Covenant — Obedience Over EmotionWhy Corporate Blindness Is the Greatest DiseaseHow Restoration Proves Mercy and Renews Purpose

Esta Semana em África fica marcada pela campanha eleitoral na Guiné-Bissau para as eleições presidenciais do próximo dia 23 de Novembro onde Fernando Dias da Costa, passou a contar com o apoio de Domingos Simões Pereira, cuja candidatura foi rejeitada pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Destaques ainda para o o impacto das manifestações pós-eleitorais em Moçambique que continua a ser sentido um ano depois e ainda sobre o Congresso Nacional de Reconciliação que terminou ontém em Luanda. Domingos Simões Pereira, presidente do partido PAIGC, explica que perante a supressão quase total dos direitos fundamentais, não há sacrifício que não possa ser consentido” para “combater a tentativa de impor tiranias no país... Na Guiné-Bissau o Presidente do Movimento Nacional da Sociedade Civil para a Paz, Democracia e Desenvolvimento, Fodé Caramba Sanhá, disse estar preocupado com os sinais de militarização da campanha eleitoral. Num balanço dos primeiros dias da campanha, Fodé Sanhá considerou que é normal apelar ao voto, mas que já não será aceitável que alguns candidatos façam permanentemente referências aos militares como forma de mobilizar o voto... Em Moçambique a actualidade fica marcada com o impacto das manifestações pós-eleitorais em Moçambique que continua a ser sentido um ano depois. João Almeida jovem de 27 anos saiu à rua, a 23 de Novembro de 2024, na Matola, nas imediações de Maputo, para se juntar a um grupo de manifestantes para pedir "uma mudança" no país. Durante o protesto, o jovem de 27 anos foi atingido na perna esquerda por um tiro da Unidade de Intervenção Rápida, foi levado para o hospital da Machava, onde só recebeu tratamento ao fim de duas horas a derramar sangue, acabando por ser amputado. Ainda em Moçambique a oposição criticou, esta semana, a participação do chefe de Estado, Daniel Chapo, na tomada de posse de Samia Suluhu Hassam para um novo mandato como Presidente da Tanzânia. Daniel Chapo justificou fazê-lo em nome da relação histórica entre os dois países. Atenções centradas igualmente para Luanda, em Angola, onde decorreu nesta semana que passou o Congresso Nacional de Reconciliação organizado pela Conferência Episcopal de Angola e São Tomé e Príncipe, que tem como finalidade a promoção da paz e da inclusão, e estabelecer um compromisso nacional para os próximos 50 anos, depois de analisadas as lições dos anos de liberdade conquistados desde 11 de novembro de 1975. O Presidente angolano, João Lourenço, esteve ausente do certame por sobreposição de agenda de Estado. Dom José Manuel Imbamba, presidente da Conferência Episcopal de Angola e São Tomé e Principe, organizadora do congresso considerou que o encontro é um espaço privilegiado para o diálogo à volta do projecto da construção de uma Angola reconciliada.

Paul Delair et Caroline Dublanche abordent un sujet du harcèlement scolaire. À l'occasion de la journée de lutte contre ce fléau le 6 novembre, ils analysent les statistiques récentes, discutent des stéréotypes de genre et évoquent l'impact du cyberharcèlement. Pourquoi les victimes osent-elles davantage s'exprimer aujourd'hui ? Comment les nouvelles mesures légales changent-elles la donne ? 3018 - Numéro national "Non au harcèlement" Association Marion la main tendue : marionlamaintendue.com Association E-enfance : e-enfance.org Chaque soir, en direct, Caroline Dublanche accueille les auditeurs pour 2h30 d'échanges et de confidences. Pour participer, contactez l'émission au 09 69 39 10 11 (prix d'un appel local) ou sur parlonsnous@rtl.frHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Num tempo em que os tablets invadem as salas de aula, Eduardo Sá defende que o futuro da escola e da aprendizagem está de volta aos livros. Porque ler e escrever é também aprender com o corpo.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Num país marcado por desigualdades sociais, transformar o programa em lei é garantir a continuidade do acesso de crianças, adolescentes e da comunidade escolar a livros e materiais didáticos

Bruno Guglielminetti s'entretient avec Nicolas Lellouche, journaliste de Numérama, à propos du tout nouveau Galaxy XR, le casque de réalité mixte signé Samsung et Google. Positionné comme un rival direct du Vision Pro d'Apple, il se distingue par un prix presque deux fois inférieur et une offre riche en contenus intégrés : Netflix, YouTube Premium, HBO et bien d'autres. Selon Nicolas Lellouche, ce pari sur le divertissement plutôt que sur la technologie pure pourrait séduire un public plus large, même si le marché reste réservé aux "early adopters". Entre stratégie Android ouverte et menace pour Meta, ce lancement pourrait redessiner la bataille des casques immersifs.

Lundi 27 octobre, François Sorel a reçu Nicolas Lellouche, journaliste à Numérama et Bruno Guglielminetti, journaliste et animateur de «Mon Carnet de l'actualité numérique», dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.

Lundi 27 octobre, François Sorel a reçu Nicolas Lellouche, journaliste à Numérama, Bruno Guglielminetti, journaliste et animateur de «Mon Carnet de l'actualité numérique», Sarah Mathew, vice-présidente expérience de livraison chez Amazon, Chris Delvizis, chef de produit lunettes connectées de livraison chez Amazon, Aaron Parness, directeur des sciences appliquées en robotique et IA chez Amazon, et Igor Pedan, responsable induction robotique chez Amazon Robotics, dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.

Why are there so many denominations and where did they come from...isn't the church supposed to be unified? And why are we South Baptist? Is there a "best" denomination?In today's episode, Pastor Derek and Pastor Jackie answer a listener question about denominational history and we look into how the church has changed over the last 2000 years. We look at Scriptures around unity and talk through whether denominations help or hinder church unity. Finally, we talk through why we are Southern Baptist specifically and our hope is to guide you into thinking deeply into why you are a part of the denomination you are and how to be unified with other believers.The 17:17 podcast is a ministry of Roseville Baptist Church (MN) that seeks to tackle cultural issues and societal questions from a biblical worldview so that listeners discover what the Bible has to say about the key issues they face on a daily basis. The 17:17 podcast seeks to teach the truth of God's Word in a way that is glorifying to God and easy to understand with the hope of furthering God's kingdom in Spirit and in Truth. Scriptures: Acts 2:1-12; Acts 15; Matthew 16:18-19; 1 Cor. 1:10-15; Jude 3; 2 John 10-11; Num. 6:1-8; Matt. 16:11; Matt. 10:1-4; Acts 1:13; John 3:22-25; Mark 11:30; Gal. 2:11-12.If you'd like access to our show notes and all the books Jackie read on sabbatical, please visit www.rosevillebaptist.com/1717podcast to see them in Google Drive!Please listen, subscribe, rate, and review the podcast so that we can reach to larger audiences and share the truth of God's Word with them!Write in your own questions to be answered on the show at 1717pod@gmail.com.  God bless!

In this episode of AI Marketing for Remodelers and Builders, hosts Kai Biami and Spencer Powell discuss the significant changes brought about by Google's Num 100 update, which has altered keyword rankings and reporting. They explore the implications for SEO strategies, the importance of focusing on user engagement and conversion rather than just keyword rankings, and the evolving landscape of digital marketing in the age of AI. The conversation emphasizes the need for marketers to adapt their strategies to align with real business outcomes and to understand the new dynamics of traffic and impressions in light of the update.

The Rosetta stone, discovered 1799: The top and middle texts are in Ancient Egyptian using hieroglyphic and Demotic scripts respectively, while the bottom is in Ancient Greek. Allowed us to unlock hieroglyphics Covenant is to scripture interpretation the same way. Should we follow the Law? Keep the Sabbath? God in the OT can seem very harsh, and in the NT He's all about love--has He changed? Does God cause evil or not? OT: Amos 3:6 “ shall there be evil in a city and the Lord has not done it?” and Isa 45:7 “I form the light and create darkness: I make peace and create evil: I the Lord do all these things”. NT: 1 John 1:5 “God is light and in him is no darkness at all”. John 10:10: "The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly." "Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever" (Heb 13:8), and “God is not a man that he should lie or the son of man that he should change his mind” (Num 23:19). The difference has to do with the covenants in place at the time. How did David have the courage to face Goliath? He knew His covenant (1 Sam 17:26, 36) circumcision was a sign of the Abrahamic covenant (Gen 17:10-14) which covered all Isaac's descendants (Gen 17:19). Included: God will bless those who bless Abraham and his descendants, and curse those who curse them (Gen 12:3) + "The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before your face; they shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways" (Deut 28:7) (Mosaic covenant in place by this time too) Jonathan and his armor-bearer knew the same promises applied (1 Sam 14:6). Covenant = Testament (Diatheke) Old and New Testament = Old and New Covenant New Covenant anticipated at the Last Supper (Luke 22:19-20), fulfilled by the cross (Hebrews 8:6-7). Gospels before this are still under the Old Covenant (Mosaic). Jesus 'didn’t come to destroy the law but fulfill it' (Matt 5:17) After the cross: Galatians 3:12: "the law is not of faith, being made a curse for us" Romans 4:7 “you died to the law” Gal 5:4: “Christ is become of no effect unto you; whosoever of you are justified by the law you are fallen from grace.” Paul’s anger in Galatians 5:12 against those who insisted that circumcision (part of the Abrahamic covenant) should continue for Christians--if used as a tool for justification Rom 3:31 “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.

Numbers 25 shows how Balaam couldn't curse Israel from the outside, so he corrupted them from the inside. Phinehas' zeal stopped a deadly plague and set a pattern: leaders must take a stand for purity, for fellowship, and for future generations. Pastor Richard Rubi applies this to modern church life—judging sexual immorality, guarding fellowship accountability, refusing discouragement, and building a legacy like Zadok, Ezra, and the Rechabites.Key texts: Num 25; Josh 22; Judg 20:18–28; Eph 6:10–14; Acts 5:27–29; Dan 3; Dan 6; Jer 35; 2 Kgs 20.https://TakingTheLandPodcast.comSUBSCRIBE TO PREMIUM FOR MORE:• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe for only $3/month on Supercast⁠: https://taking-the-land.supercast.com/⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe for only $3.99/month on Spotify⁠: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/taking-the-land/subscribe⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠Subscribe for only $4.99/month on Apple Podcasts⁠: https://apple.co/3vy1s5b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Chapters00:00 The Call to Preach and Fundraising02:42 The Importance of Sacred Offerings05:45 Understanding Spiritual Supply Chains08:35 The Necessity of Generosity11:31 The Impact of Missed Opportunities14:36 Skin in the Game: The Importance of Investment17:39 Insider Trading in the Kingdom20:36 The Power of Generosity23:42 The Role of Prayer in Ministry24:23 Taking a Stand in Leadership27:08 The Battle Against Immorality30:17 The Importance of Bold Leadership33:00 Defending the Right Battlefield36:04 The Call to Conviction39:15 The Consequences of Compromise42:02 Lessons from History: Standing Firm46:32 Making a Stand for Purity50:34 The Importance of Fellowship57:24 Standing Up When Others Give Up01:01:39 Legacy and Future Generations01:12:28 The Cost of Compromise01:16:29 A Call to ActionShow NotesALL PROCEEDS GO TO WORLD EVANGELISMLocate a CFM Church near you: https://cfmmap.orgWe need five-star reviews! Tell the world what you think about this podcast at: • Apple Podcasts: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://apple.co/3vy1s5b • Podchaser: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/taking-the-land-cfm-sermon-pod-43369