Podcasts about Dobb

Bob Dobbs was Marshall McLuhan's archivist, and is a renegade McLuhan scholar. In this episode we discuss the work of James Joyce, Marshall McLuhan, and Joyce's Finnegans Wake.Dobb's site: https://ionandbob.com/---Become part of the Hermitix community:Hermitix Twitter - / hermitixpodcast Hermitix Discord - / discord Support Hermitix:Hermitix Subscription - https://hermitix.net/subscribe/ Patreon - / hermitix Donations: - https://www.paypal.me/hermitixpodHermitix Merchandise - http://teespring.com/stores/hermitix-2Bitcoin Donation Address: 3LAGEKBXEuE2pgc4oubExGTWtrKPuXDDLKEthereum Donation Address: 0x31e2a4a31B8563B8d238eC086daE9B75a00D9E74

Del två av Fotbollsmorgons årssummering. Minns ni alla fantastiska måndagar och stunder vi haft tillsammans med Alexander Axén? Eller en av alla gånger Jesper och Fabbe absolut inte kommit överens? Och visst kommer ni ihåg den otroligt fina halvtimmen vi fick med Sven-Göran Eriksson i slutet av april – känns som igår, eller hur? Nu finns typ alla godbitar från 2024 samlat här i vår årssummering. Häng med Axel och Fabbe på en nostalgitripp genom 2024. God fortsättning på er! 1:14 Alexander Axéns minne Fabbe och Jesper håller inte med varandra: https://youtu.be/T5ZJYFAnSas?si=yIq_jZnVP1CK1u9f&t=3200 18:44 Saga Fredriksson 22:17 Dawid Fjälls minne Sven-Göran Eriksson: https://www.youtube.com/live/o_c_edJRuC0?si=eT1iU0MhPt0j7Opt&t=7243 Helena af Sandeberg gästspel 1: https://www.youtube.com/live/Tqi7v1HPi0M?si=3AoVjyA0ryX2jAWN&t=5526 Helena af Sandebergs gästspel 2: https://www.youtube.com/live/Im6XrprpMCw?si=rslWA3kzjpcabaJj&t=3561 Helena af Sandebergs gästspel 3: https://www.youtube.com/live/W3uMpFR_PpM?si=IAr3GbVP4pqy4zvK&t=5391 Kontakta redaktionen: otto@dobb.se Annonsering och samarbeten: johan.rydell@dobb.se Ansvarig utgivare: Dawid Fjäll, david.fjall@dobb.se Producerat av Dobb 2.0 AB | https://www.fotbollsmorgon.se

Fredrik talks to Dejan Milicic about software development - understanding, methods, and stories. We start by talking about encapsulation of knowledge and the essential software in organizations. Almost every organization should - it can be argued - be developing software that solves their unique problems, and yet so many outsource so much of their knowledge encapsulation. Oh, and we can never completely encapsulate our knowledge in code either, so all the more reason to keep people who actually know what the code does and why around. Dejan tells us about his way to Ravendb and a developer relations role - and how you can craft your own job, stepping suitably outside of your comfort zone along the way. We also talk about shortening attention spans, daring to dig down a bit and find out about the context of things. Like the second sentence of some oft-repeated quote. Prohibit bad things, but help automate doing good things and avoid doing the bad things completely. Dejan shares some database backstories - why would someone want to build one more database? Specifically, what lead to the creation of Ravendb? And the very strong opinions which have been built into it. Avoiding falling into marketing-driven development. After that, we drift into talking about processes and how we work. Every organization is unique - which strongly speaks against adapting the “best practices” and methodologies of others. Or keeping things completely the same for too long. Innovation is also about doing what other people are not doing. Why is concurrency still hard? The free lunch has been over for twenty years! Functional programming and immutability offer ways forward, why aren't these concepts spreading even more and faster? We get right back to understanding more context when Dejan discusses how few of us seem to have understood, just for example, the L in SOLID. Dive deeper, read more, and you will find new things and come up with new ideas. Finally, Dejan would like to see software development becoming just a little bit more mathematical. So that things can be established, verified and built on in a different way. Thank you Cloudnet for sponsoring our VPS! Comments, questions or tips? We a re @kodsnack, @tobiashieta, @oferlundand @bjoreman on Twitter, have a page on Facebook and can be emailed at info@kodsnack.se if you want to write longer. We read everything we receive. If you enjoy Kodsnack we would love a review in iTunes! You can also support the podcast by buying us a coffee (or two!) through Ko-fi. Links Dejan Ravendb Informatics Domain-driven design Event sourcing Data is worthless - said in episode 601 Developer relations Nosql databases Jack of all trades Jimmy - who introduced Fredrik to Dejan at Øredev 2024 Hibernate Relational databases Oren Eini - creator of Ravendb Antipatterns n+1 Couchbase Scrum Agile software development The Toyota approach The Scrum guide Unison programming language - VC funded Dr. Dobb's journal The free lunch is over Concurrency SOLID Liskov substitution principle Repositories on top Unitofwork are not a good idea - by Rob Conery Elm Titles A mathematician turned software developer Coding, but without deadline Saturated with software development Encapsulation of knowledge A bit surreal Accept people as they are There's a second line Professional depression Prevented, not diagnosed The pipeline kind of thinking Frustration-driven development (You shouldn't be) Punished for being successful The largest company of his or her life so far Optimized for maintaining the status quo Wash away all the context Manager of one The proverbial Jira Substantial content Methods of moving forward

Fredrik talks to Dejan Milicic about software development - understanding, methods, and stories. We start by talking about encapsulation of knowledge and the essential software in organizations. Almost every organization should - it can be argued - be developing software that solves their unique problems, and yet so many outsource so much of their knowledge encapsulation. Oh, and we can never completely encapsulate our knowledge in code either, so all the more reason to keep people who actually know what the code does and why around. Dejan tells us about his way to Ravendb and a developer relations role - and how you can craft your own job, stepping suitably outside of your comfort zone along the way. We also talk about shortening attention spans, daring to dig down a bit and find out about the context of things. Like the second sentence of some oft-repeated quote. Prohibit bad things, but help automate doing good things and avoid doing the bad things completely. Dejan shares some database backstories - why would someone want to build one more database? Specifically, what lead to the creation of Ravendb? And the very strong opinions which have been built into it. Avoiding falling into marketing-driven development. After that, we drift into talking about processes and how we work. Every organization is unique - which strongly speaks against adapting the “best practices” and methodologies of others. Or keeping things completely the same for too long. Innovation is also about doing what other people are not doing. Why is concurrency still hard? The free lunch has been over for twenty years! Functional programming and immutability offer ways forward, why aren’t these concepts spreading even more and faster? We get right back to understanding more context when Dejan discusses how few of us seem to have understood, just for example, the L in SOLID. Dive deeper, read more, and you will find new things and come up with new ideas. Finally, Dejan would like to see software development becoming just a little bit more mathematical. So that things can be established, verified and built on in a different way. Thank you Cloudnet for sponsoring our VPS! Comments, questions or tips? We a re @kodsnack, @tobiashieta, @oferlund and @bjoreman on Twitter, have a page on Facebook and can be emailed at info@kodsnack.se if you want to write longer. We read everything we receive. If you enjoy Kodsnack we would love a review in iTunes! You can also support the podcast by buying us a coffee (or two!) through Ko-fi. Links Dejan Ravendb Informatics Domain-driven design Event sourcing Data is worthless - said in episode 601 Developer relations Nosql databases Jack of all trades Jimmy - who introduced Fredrik to Dejan at Øredev 2024 Hibernate Relational databases Oren Eini - creator of Ravendb Antipatterns n+1 Couchbase Scrum Agile software development The Toyota approach The Scrum guide Unison programming language - VC funded Dr. Dobb’s journal The free lunch is over Concurrency SOLID Liskov substitution principle Repositories on top Unitofwork are not a good idea - by Rob Conery Elm Titles A mathematician turned software developer Coding, but without deadline Saturated with software development Encapsulation of knowledge A bit surreal Accept people as they are There’s a second line Professional depression Prevented, not diagnosed The pipeline kind of thinking Frustration-driven development (You shouldn’t be) Punished for being successful The largest company of his or her life so far Optimized for maintaining the status quo Wash away all the context Manager of one The proverbial Jira Substantial content Methods of moving forward

OPINIONS, MORALITY, AND MEDICAL REALITY: WHY I'M A VOTING “YES” ON MISSOURI AMENDMENT 3Reader warning: This piece includes language regarding abortion, and sexual assault.As a man I am uniquely unqualified to talk about Women's reproductive health. Along with being a man, I am not a doctor and have very little formal education regarding human reproduction. In fact, in high school I was able to choose between biology and physical science (physics light) and I took physical science. Instead of human anatomy I took an astronomy class. You want to know about planetary movement via ellipse? I've got you covered. But when it comes to the science behind female reproductive matters, I am - to quote Missouri Congressman Jason Smith “not an expert” on the topic. Being not an expert on the topic, however, doesn't stop plenty of folks, men and women alike, from taking strong stances on the topic of abortion. In Missouri, where I live with my wife (who is not a medical professional either but is a mother of 3 and seems to know a bit more about her own health needs than I do) we have Amendment 3 on the November ballot. Amendment 3 (MO3) asks voters in Missouri whether or not we should amend our State Constitution to allow for reproductive care to be legal, with regulation, in the State. You can read the actual text on the Secretary of State's website. THE BASIC ARGUMENTS AGAINSTFolks arguing against MO3 have taken two main paths. First, the most common and predictable, is the purely moral argument. That abortion is wrong, period. This is typically through a religious stance. Second, is that the language of the proposed amendment allows for various other medical procedures including gender affirming care, and that somehow children will be given secret transition surgery without parental consent. Most far-fetched is that somehow these secret surgeries will be happening at school. The second argument, the one about the broad language and secret surgeries, is flat out ridiculous. It is, at best, ill-informed and at worst an intentionally misleading lie. It's so clearly incorrect that I have nothing more to say on it other than to say this: Anyone making that argument is verifiably and demonstrably wrong. The first, the moral argument, reveals an issue that is glossed over. It is not an actual argument about abortion, what it is, what it means, or when it occurs, but rather a desire to have state law mirror religious belief. The most obvious and simple retort here is that our system is intentionally designed to avoid just that. Passing laws to enact religious doctrine is inherently unconstitutional, and it has been. More importantly, the moral argument is often centered around the concept that “abortion” means killing - and ignores the reality of what “abortion” actually includes. PERSONAL EDUCATION POST DOBBS DECISION Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in the Dobb's case, overturning the Roe case and returning the question of abortion's legality to the States, I would have told you that while I supported a woman's right to choose, I thought all abortion was a tragedy. I was a fairly standard “pro-choice, but” kind of voter in that way, and it is a position that a lot of folks shared. After Dobbs, however, I learned. I educated myself on the medical procedures that fall into “abortion” and I listened to the folks who could best educate me on the topic. I listened to doctors. I listened to WOMEN. Before Dobbs I couldn't have told what a “D&C” or “D&E” procedure was, or why they were used, or when they were needed. Now, I know. You can read the actual stats on abortion in the United States including the data from the CDC which shows when in the gestational stage most abortive procedures take place.  What I learned left me with two conclusions: I knew even less than I thought about abortion. I shouldn't be making the decision about these medical issues.I mentioned above I'm a father to three, yet even after experiencing the births of my own children I was still woefully out of touch with reality. CHOICE ALLOWS HEALTH CAREWhat I know, now, is that “abortion” is a single word with a broad medical meaning. What I know  now, is that “abortion” is not what I was led to believe through my church or moral instruction on the topic. Pew Research provides the following information: “The CDC broadly divides abortions into two categories: surgical abortions and medication abortions, which involve pills. Since the Food and Drug Administration first approved abortion pills in 2000, their use has increased over time as a share of abortions nationally, according to both the CDC and Guttmacher.The majority of abortions in the U.S. now involve pills, according to both the CDC and Guttmacher. The CDC says 56% of U.S. abortions in 2021 involved pills, up from 53% in 2020 and 44% in 2019. Its figures for 2021 include the District of Columbia and 44 states that provided this data; its figures for 2020 include D.C. and 44 states (though not all of the same states as in 2021), and its figures for 2019 include D.C. and 45 states.”That same research reveals that roughly 99% of all abortion procedures, of any kind, occur prior to the third trimester. In fact, there are only a handful of states where such a procedure could even be obtained and most places where abortion is legal (which for now does NOT include MIssouri) have specific viability language. In addition, the allegations of “post birth” abortion is, to put it politely, utter nonsense.It is a fiction that is sensationalized and sold because there is simply no one in favor of murdering an infant. It's an abhorrent lie meant to inflame the passions of the person hearing it and as a result the word “abortion” is used to mean something that it simply isn't. It's a rhetorical trick, an illusion, designed to mislead you.MISSOURI'S LANGUAGEThe actual language proposed in Missouri specifically allows for regulation after “Fetal Viability” as well, so claims that MO3 will create some wild scenario where women who are 9 months pregnant are going to suddenly be lining up to have “late term” abortions is not only ridiculous and statistically false, it's a flat out lie based on the actual language, seen here directly from the ballot language itself: WORST CASES ARE HARD TO DISCUSSI will close with this unfortunate reality. There are women, girls, mothers and sisters and daughters, who are or will be in residential care. There are real stories of rape of women in care facilities. I am the father of a daughter who cannot speak without assistance, who cannot fight off a would-be attacker, but who could be a victim of just such an attack. Is it likely? No, it isn't. But it is far more real in terms of risk than the dark fantasy of infanticide peddled by anti- abortion groups. I'm voting YES on MO3 for basic freedom, for the protection of my own daughters, for my wife's access to her healthcare, and for every other person in MIssouri who might need a medical procedure that I'm not qualified to fully understand. I'm voting YES on MO3 because when it comes to medical decisions and reproductive care the only people with input should be those in the exam room. I'm voting YES on MO3 because legality and morality are not the same things and because it's not my place to decide what is right or wrong for another person's life. I'm voting YES on MO3 because I trust women to make their own decisions. I'm voting YES on MO3 because the arguments being made are false. Finally, I'm voting YES on MO3 because I'm choosing to mind my own damn business. You can too, and it's so easy to do. All you do is use the marker to fill in the bubble next to “Yes” on the ballot.”  @TheHeartlandPOD on Twitter and ThreadsCo-HostsAdam Sommer @Adam_Sommer85 (Twitter) @adam_sommer85 (Threads)Rachel Parker @msraitchetp (Threads) Sean Diller (no social)The Heartland Collective - Sign Up Today!JOIN PATREON FOR MORE - AND JOIN OUR SOCIAL NETWORK!“Change The Conversation”Outro Song: “The World Is On Fire” by American Aquarium http://www.americanaquarium.com/

OPINIONS, MORALITY, AND MEDICAL REALITY: WHY I'M A VOTING “YES” ON MISSOURI AMENDMENT 3Reader warning: This piece includes language regarding abortion, and sexual assault.As a man I am uniquely unqualified to talk about Women's reproductive health. Along with being a man, I am not a doctor and have very little formal education regarding human reproduction. In fact, in high school I was able to choose between biology and physical science (physics light) and I took physical science. Instead of human anatomy I took an astronomy class. You want to know about planetary movement via ellipse? I've got you covered. But when it comes to the science behind female reproductive matters, I am - to quote Missouri Congressman Jason Smith “not an expert” on the topic. Being not an expert on the topic, however, doesn't stop plenty of folks, men and women alike, from taking strong stances on the topic of abortion. In Missouri, where I live with my wife (who is not a medical professional either but is a mother of 3 and seems to know a bit more about her own health needs than I do) we have Amendment 3 on the November ballot. Amendment 3 (MO3) asks voters in Missouri whether or not we should amend our State Constitution to allow for reproductive care to be legal, with regulation, in the State. You can read the actual text on the Secretary of State's website. THE BASIC ARGUMENTS AGAINSTFolks arguing against MO3 have taken two main paths. First, the most common and predictable, is the purely moral argument. That abortion is wrong, period. This is typically through a religious stance. Second, is that the language of the proposed amendment allows for various other medical procedures including gender affirming care, and that somehow children will be given secret transition surgery without parental consent. Most far-fetched is that somehow these secret surgeries will be happening at school. The second argument, the one about the broad language and secret surgeries, is flat out ridiculous. It is, at best, ill-informed and at worst an intentionally misleading lie. It's so clearly incorrect that I have nothing more to say on it other than to say this: Anyone making that argument is verifiably and demonstrably wrong. The first, the moral argument, reveals an issue that is glossed over. It is not an actual argument about abortion, what it is, what it means, or when it occurs, but rather a desire to have state law mirror religious belief. The most obvious and simple retort here is that our system is intentionally designed to avoid just that. Passing laws to enact religious doctrine is inherently unconstitutional, and it has been. More importantly, the moral argument is often centered around the concept that “abortion” means killing - and ignores the reality of what “abortion” actually includes. PERSONAL EDUCATION POST DOBBS DECISION Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in the Dobb's case, overturning the Roe case and returning the question of abortion's legality to the States, I would have told you that while I supported a woman's right to choose, I thought all abortion was a tragedy. I was a fairly standard “pro-choice, but” kind of voter in that way, and it is a position that a lot of folks shared. After Dobbs, however, I learned. I educated myself on the medical procedures that fall into “abortion” and I listened to the folks who could best educate me on the topic. I listened to doctors. I listened to WOMEN. Before Dobbs I couldn't have told what a “D&C” or “D&E” procedure was, or why they were used, or when they were needed. Now, I know. You can read the actual stats on abortion in the United States including the data from the CDC which shows when in the gestational stage most abortive procedures take place.  What I learned left me with two conclusions: I knew even less than I thought about abortion. I shouldn't be making the decision about these medical issues.I mentioned above I'm a father to three, yet even after experiencing the births of my own children I was still woefully out of touch with reality. CHOICE ALLOWS HEALTH CAREWhat I know, now, is that “abortion” is a single word with a broad medical meaning. What I know  now, is that “abortion” is not what I was led to believe through my church or moral instruction on the topic. Pew Research provides the following information: “The CDC broadly divides abortions into two categories: surgical abortions and medication abortions, which involve pills. Since the Food and Drug Administration first approved abortion pills in 2000, their use has increased over time as a share of abortions nationally, according to both the CDC and Guttmacher.The majority of abortions in the U.S. now involve pills, according to both the CDC and Guttmacher. The CDC says 56% of U.S. abortions in 2021 involved pills, up from 53% in 2020 and 44% in 2019. Its figures for 2021 include the District of Columbia and 44 states that provided this data; its figures for 2020 include D.C. and 44 states (though not all of the same states as in 2021), and its figures for 2019 include D.C. and 45 states.”That same research reveals that roughly 99% of all abortion procedures, of any kind, occur prior to the third trimester. In fact, there are only a handful of states where such a procedure could even be obtained and most places where abortion is legal (which for now does NOT include MIssouri) have specific viability language. In addition, the allegations of “post birth” abortion is, to put it politely, utter nonsense.It is a fiction that is sensationalized and sold because there is simply no one in favor of murdering an infant. It's an abhorrent lie meant to inflame the passions of the person hearing it and as a result the word “abortion” is used to mean something that it simply isn't. It's a rhetorical trick, an illusion, designed to mislead you.MISSOURI'S LANGUAGEThe actual language proposed in Missouri specifically allows for regulation after “Fetal Viability” as well, so claims that MO3 will create some wild scenario where women who are 9 months pregnant are going to suddenly be lining up to have “late term” abortions is not only ridiculous and statistically false, it's a flat out lie based on the actual language, seen here directly from the ballot language itself: WORST CASES ARE HARD TO DISCUSSI will close with this unfortunate reality. There are women, girls, mothers and sisters and daughters, who are or will be in residential care. There are real stories of rape of women in care facilities. I am the father of a daughter who cannot speak without assistance, who cannot fight off a would-be attacker, but who could be a victim of just such an attack. Is it likely? No, it isn't. But it is far more real in terms of risk than the dark fantasy of infanticide peddled by anti- abortion groups. I'm voting YES on MO3 for basic freedom, for the protection of my own daughters, for my wife's access to her healthcare, and for every other person in MIssouri who might need a medical procedure that I'm not qualified to fully understand. I'm voting YES on MO3 because when it comes to medical decisions and reproductive care the only people with input should be those in the exam room. I'm voting YES on MO3 because legality and morality are not the same things and because it's not my place to decide what is right or wrong for another person's life. I'm voting YES on MO3 because I trust women to make their own decisions. I'm voting YES on MO3 because the arguments being made are false. Finally, I'm voting YES on MO3 because I'm choosing to mind my own damn business. You can too, and it's so easy to do. All you do is use the marker to fill in the bubble next to “Yes” on the ballot.”  @TheHeartlandPOD on Twitter and ThreadsCo-HostsAdam Sommer @Adam_Sommer85 (Twitter) @adam_sommer85 (Threads)Rachel Parker @msraitchetp (Threads) Sean Diller (no social)The Heartland Collective - Sign Up Today!JOIN PATREON FOR MORE - AND JOIN OUR SOCIAL NETWORK!“Change The Conversation”Outro Song: “The World Is On Fire” by American Aquarium http://www.americanaquarium.com/

MSNBC's Joy Reid joins Erin Ryan and Alyssa Mastromonaco for the pre-election final stretch. They break down Ron DeSantis' latest voter intimidation schemes, new data illustrating the consequences of Dobb's decisions, and Trump's never-ending mission to antagonize the Exonerated Central Park 5. The ladies are feeling petty about WNBA referees and JD Vance's marriage, but luckily, Barack Obama on the campaign trail is keeping them sane.Florida official says DeSantis's office ordered him to threaten TV stations over abortion ads (The Hill 10/21)Infant mortality in the U.S. worsened after Supreme Court limited abortion access (LA Times 10/21)Exonerated Central Park Five sue Trump for defamation over debate remarks (Washington Post 10/21)Giuliani assets will transfer to Georgia election workers he defamed (WaPo 10/22)

Panelen har fått åldersnoja och börjar avsnittet med ett samtal om det stora 30. När ångesten lagt sig är det dags för dagens första samtal. Det blir till Ella Lindvall som berättar om allt som sker i FC Rosengård. Laget går mot tidernas säsong och har ännu inte förlorat. Trots det stormar det runt klubben sedan fotbollschefen Roger Palmgren, enligt spelarna, tagit för stor ära av framgångarna. Knallseger för Elfsborg, vinst för Malmö och kryss för Djurgården. Var gårdagen den bästa svenska någonsin i Europa-sammanhang? Det blir självklart en genomgång av resultaten och denna dag blir den extra lång. Vi pratar med förra ordföranden i Guliganerna, Glenn Holvik, MFF-supportern Jon Nordström och Dobb:s egna resande reporter Björn Johnson. Dogge Doggelito kommer också förbi i studion och bjuder på lite sång. Artisten får berätta om hur det kommer sig att han har en tendens att dyka upp mest överallt och varför han sjöng inmarschlåten till ett division 5- lag. Sen kommer Noice- medlemmen Peo Thyrén förbi. Vi pratar musik och fotboll och han får ge sin syn på sitt älskade Djurgården. Thyrén berättar också om hur det var att spela in "Så mycket bättre" och om han tycker Kim och Tolle borde vara kvar. Innan vi avslutar är det för näst sista gången dags att se hur det ligger till i Sveriges bästa förlorare. Denna vecka kryddar vi omgången med ett samtal till förra årets mästare, Klagstorps IF. Fullspäckat schema och då finns det bara en sak att göra... TUNE IN!!! Programledare: Axel Insulander Panelen: Saga Fredriksson, Sabri Suvakci & Robin Berglund Länk till YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56xQdhSa6KA

Teil 2 des Gesprächs mit Christoph Sorg. Diesmal zur Geschichte der Planung im Kapitalismus und 'Finance as a form of planning'.   Shownotes: Christoph bei der HU Berlin: https://www.sowi.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/zukunftarbeit/soziologie-von-arbeit-wirtschaft-und-technologischem-wandel-team/christoph-sorg Christophs Webseite: https://christophsorg.wordpress.com/ Christoph bei twitter (X): https://x.com/christophsorg Sorg, C. (2024). Postkapitalistische reproduktion. PROKLA. Zeitschrift Für Kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 54(215): https://www.prokla.de/index.php/PROKLA/article/view/2122 Sorg, C. (2023). Finance as a form of economic planning. Competition & Change.: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10245294231217578 Sorg, C. (2022). Failing to plan is planning to fail: Toward an expanded notion of democratically planned postcapitalism. Critical Sociology, 49(3), 475–493.: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08969205221081058 Sorg, C. (2022). Social movements and the politics of debt – Transnational resistance against debt on three continents. [open access]: https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789048553273/social-movements-and-the-politics-of-debt Groos, J. und Sorg, C.(Hrsg.) (i.V., geplant für 2025). Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and beyond. Alternatives to Capitalism Series. Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction Sorg, C. und Groos, J. (Hrsg., im Erscheinen). ‘Rethinking Economic Planning'. Competition & Change Special Issue. Weitere Shownotes Engels, F. (1894). ‘Anti-Dühring (Herrn Eugen Dühring's Umwälzung der Wissenschaft)': http://www.mlwerke.de/me/me20/me20_001.htm   [Zitat “islands of conscious power in this ocean of unconscious co-operation like lumps of butter coagulating in a pail of buttermilk" aus] Robertson, D. H. (1923). ‚The Control Of Industry' S. 85: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.262304/page/n97/mode/2up Simon, H. ( 1991). ‚Organizations and Markets‘ (Journal of Economic Perspectives): https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.5.2.25 [Zu Dobbs Kritik der Neoklassik aus marxistischer Sicht s. etwa] Dobb, Maurice (1937) ‘Political Economy And Capitalism Some Essays In Economic Tradition': https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.263349/page/n1/mode/2up Zur Debatte zwischen Maurice Dobb und Paul Sweezy, siehe: https://classes.matthewjbrown.net/teaching-files/marx/dobb-sweezy-debate.pdf Block, F. (1977). ‘The Ruling Class Does Not Rule' (Socialist Revolution Nr. 33): https://www.sscc.wisc.edu/soc/faculty/pages/wright/SOC621/RulingClass.pdf Lindblom, C. (1982). ‘The Market as Prison' (The Journal of Politics Vol. 44, No. 2): https://web.archive.org/web/20170215043139/http://sites.uci.edu/ipeatuci/files/2014/12/Lindblom-Market-Prison.pdf Cummings, S. & Daellenbach U. (2009). ‘A Guide to the Future of Strategy?: The History of Long Range Planning': https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024630108001234 Laibman, D. (2022). ‘Systemic Socialism: A Model of the Models': https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/siso.2022.86.2.225 Fisher, M. (2009). ‚Capitalist Realism – Is There No Alternative?': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalist_Realism Graeber, D. (2013). ‘The Utopia of Rules – On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy' (u. a. zum “Iron Law of Liberalism“): https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-the-utopia-of-rules Christophers, B. (2024). ‚The Price is Wrong - Why Capitalism Won't Save the Planet': https://www.versobooks.com/products/3069-the-price-is-wrong Alami, I. & Dixon, A. (2019). ‘The Strange Geographies of the New State Capitalism': https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3457979 Schumpeter, J. (1939). ‘Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process': https://www.mises.at/static/literatur/Buch/schumpeter-business-cycles-a-theoretical-historical-and-statistical-analysis-of-the-capitalist-process.pdf Krippner, G. (2012). ‘Capitalizing on Crisis – The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance': https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674066199 Streeck, W. (2013). 'Gekaufte Zeit – Die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus‘ [Leseprobe mit Inhalt + Einleitung]: https://www.bpb.de/system/files/dokument_pdf/9783518585924.pdf Devine, P. (1988). ‘Democracy and Economic Planning: The Political Economy of a Self-Governing Society': https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340148308_Democracy_and_Economic_Planning_The_Political_Economy_of_a_Self-governing_Society [Zur Mont Pelerin Society, s. etwa] Mirowski, P. & Plehwe, D. (2015) ‘The Road from Mont Pèlerin – The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective‘: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674495111/html Braun, B. (2021). ‘Asset manager capitalism as a corporate governance regime': https://benjaminbraun.org/assets/pubs/braun_amc-as-corporate-governance-regime.pdf Braun, B. (2021). ‘Central bank planning for public purpose': https://benjaminbraun.org/assets/pubs/braun_central-bank-planning-public-purpose.pdf Polanyi, K. (1944). ‘The Great Transformation – The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time' [gesamtes Buch als pdf; u. a. Zitat S. 147 „Laissez-faire was planned; planning was not“]: https://inctpped.ie.ufrj.br/spiderweb/pdf_4/Great_Transformation.pdf Phillips, L. & Rozworski, M.(2019). ‘The People's Republic of Walmart – How the World's Biggest Corporations are Laying the Foundation for Socialism': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People%27s_Republic_of_Walmart Sawyer, M. (1985). ‘Economics of Michal Kalecki': https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-349-18031-8 Quebec Solidarity Fonds/Fonds de solidarité FTQ: https://www.fondsftq.com/en/personal/choose-the-fonds/act-solidarity Sorg, C. (2022). ‘Social movements and the politics of debt – Transnational resistance against debt on three continents' [ganzes Buch als pdf, u. a. zur Bewegung Strike Debt in Kalifornien, die öffentliche Banken für eine sozial-ökologische Transformation einsetzt]: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57298 Block, F. (2019). ‘Financial democratization and the transition to socialism' https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329219879274 Roemer, J. (1996). ‘Equal Shares – Making Market Socialism Work': https://www.versobooks.com/products/1557-equal-shares Schweickart, D. (2011). ‚After capitalism‘: https://www.academia.edu/23023501/_David_Schweickart_After_Capitalism_New_Critical_Book4You_ Devine, P. (1988). ‘Participatory planning through negotiated coordination': https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Participatory-planning-through-negotiated-Devine/bb8dc49259c622084ff91404819d8e020e8dd776 Wright, E. O., (2010) ‘Envisioning Real Utopias': https://web.archive.org/web/20190927215917id_/https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/ERU_files/ENVISIONING%20REAL%20UTOPIIAS%20--%20complete%20manuscript%2012-2008.pdf Zum Meidner-Plan in Schweden (1970er) siehe zum Beispiel: https://www.jacobin.de/artikel/rudolf-meidner-der-radikale-reformer-sozialdemokratie-meidner-plan-olof-palme Neil Warners Promotionsprojekt bei der London School of Economics: https://www.lse.ac.uk/sociology/people/research-students/neil-warner/neil-warner Weber, I. (2021). ‘How China Escaped Shock Therapy – The Market Reform Debate': https://www.routledge.com/How-China-Escaped-Shock-Therapy-The-Market-Reform-Debate/Weber/p/book/9781032008493 Arrighi, G. (2008). ‘Adam Smith in Beijing – Die Genealogie des 21. Jahrhunderts‘ [gesamtes Buch verlinkt]: https://www.vsa-verlag.de/nc/detail/artikel/adam-smith-in-beijing/ Pomeranz, K. (2000). ‘The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy': http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Pomeranz2000.pdf Scott, J. (2008). ‘Authoritarian High Modernism‘ (Kapitel 3 aus dem Buch Seeing Like a State – How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed): https://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Scott.pdf   Thematisch angrenzende Folgen S01E59 | Joscha Wullweber zu Zentralbankkapitalismus: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e59-joscha-wullweber-zu-zentralbankkapitalismus/ S02E48 | Heide Lutosch, Christoph Sorg und Stefan Meretz zu Vergesellschaftung und demokratischer Planung: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e48-heide-lutosch-christoph-sorg-und-stefan-meretz-zu-vergesellschaftung-und-demokratischer-planung/ S02E09 | Isabella M. Weber zu Chinas drittem Weg: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e09-isabella-m-weber-zu-chinas-drittem-weg/ S02E33 | Pat Devine on Negotiated Coordination: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e33-pat-devine-on-negotiated-coordination/ S02E19 | David Laibman on Multilevel Democratic Iterative Coordination: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e19-david-laibman-on-multilevel-democratic-iterative-coordination/ S02E08 | Thomas Biebricher zu neoliberaler Regierungskunst: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e08-thomas-biebricher-zu-neoliberaler-regierungskunst/ S02E47 | Matt Huber on Building Socialism, Climate Change & Class War: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e47-matt-huber-on-building-socialism-climate-change-class-war/ S03E17 | Klaus Dörre zu Utopie, Nachhaltigkeit und einer Linken für das 21. Jahrhundert: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e17-klaus-doerre-zu-utopie-nachhaltigkeit-und-einer-linken-fuer-das-21-jh/ Future Histories Kontakt & Unterstützung Wenn euch Future Histories gefällt, dann erwägt doch bitte eine Unterstützung auf Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistorie Schreibt mir unter office@futurehistories.today Diskutiert mit auf Twitter (#FutureHistories): https://twitter.com/FutureHpodcast auf Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/futurehistories.bsky.social auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ oder auf Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories Webseite mit allen Folgen: www.futurehistories.today English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com/  Episode Keywords #ChristophSorg, #JanGroos, #FutureHistories, #Podcast, #Sphärentrennung, #Planung, #SozialistischePlanung, #KapitalistischePlanung, #Unternehmensplanung, #StaatlichePlanung, #Neoliberalismus, #Neoliberalisierung, #Hoch-Moderne, #Zentralbankkapitalismus, #Finanzkapitalismus, #Zentralbankplanung, #Vergesellschaftung, #Meidner-Plan, #Kapitalstreik, #Marktsozialismus, #SozialeBewegungen, Sozial-ökologischeTransformation, #Finanzialisierung, #Asset-ManagerKapitalismus, #Postkapitalismus, #IronLawOfLiberalism, #StrategischesManagement, #Governance, #Deregulierung, #Staatsausgaben, #Fiskalpolitik, #Staatsquote, #Bidenomics, #CapitalistRealism, #Liberalismus, #Staatskapitalismus, #De-risking, #Markt-Koordination, #StrikeDebt, #BenjaminBraun

First MX win for Pro Circuit on Kawasaki's when James Dobb took the overall on a very dusty Unadilla. Rarick, Weege and Matthes look back at this race and all the DNF's, peak Kiedrowski, Dowd's almost win, Bradshaw's crash, Larocco's win, Holley doing TV and more. We get Mike Hooker who was PC's crew chief back then to tell us about what he remembers from Dobb's win.

We're incredibly honored to welcome Erin Lee, a dynamo from Dysphoria and a staunch advocate for parental rights. Today, she opens up about her groundbreaking mission in Colorado through her visionary organization, Protect Colorado Kids. This movement is all about empowering parents, grandparents, community leaders, and anyone who believes in safeguarding our children's futures against the tide of “false truths.” Erin's passion for uniting families and communities in the fight to uphold parental rights is both inspiring and infectious. Wondering how you can be a part of this change? Listen in as Erin shares her story and the ways we can all contribute to a brighter future for our kids. Connect with Erin: Protect Colorado Kids https://www.protectkidscolorado.org/ Art Club Movie https://www.artclubmovie.com/ Erin for Parental Right - Facebook https://www.facebook.com/erinforparentalrights Erin for Parental Rights - Instagram https://www.instagram.com/erinforparentalrights/ *****SHOW NOTES***** Federal Judge Blocks Biden Title IX Guidance Redefining ‘Sex Discrimination' for LGBTQIAAP2S+ Agenda https://www.infowars.com/posts/federal-judge-blocks-biden-title-ix-guidance-redefining-sex-discrimination-for-lgbtqiaap2s-agenda/ Tumor Caused by Racism https://www.infowars.com/posts/ridiculous-characters-tumor-caused-by-racism-in-nbc-hospital-drama/ Women's strike on 2nd anniversary of Dobb's decision held at Allen County Courthouse https://www.wane.com/top-stories/womens-strike-on-2nd-anniversary-of-dobbs-decision-held-at-allen-county-courthouse/ Brace yourself: Making computers from human brains is the new environmentalism https://www.theblaze.com/return/brace-yourself-making-computers-from-human-brains-is-the-new-environmentalism ******** Watch DYSPHORIA www.dysphoriamovie.com Learn more about Fearless Features —> www.fearlessfeatures.org Subscribe to our newsletter and emails! —> www.fearlessfeatures.org/newsletter Donate a tax-deductible gift to Fearless Features. —> igfn.us/form/-yFw_w Shop the Store —> www.fearlessfeatures.org/shop

Since long before Roe v Wade enshrined a federal right to choose in 1973, abortion has been one of the most contentious issues in American life. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe with their decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, marking  a new peak in the political energy and emotion surrounding abortion. Katie's guest today, New York Times journalist Jodi Kantor (who won a Pulitzer for her Me Too reporting), has been behind some of the most exhaustively sourced and in-depth reporting on just how Dobbs unfolded.    As Jodi tells us, in many ways, SCOTUS' Dobb's decision was shocking. The case started as a long-shot ban on abortions after 15-weeks in Mississippi. But a series of events made it one of the most monumental in American history: an even more controversial case from Texas coming along at the same time, Justice Ginsberg's death, and an unprecedented leak of the decision in Dobbs that some feel affected Justices' ability to deliberate fully. It's easy to imagine this going differently if even one of those things changed.   Roe's reversal could be interpreted as the triumphant fruition of 50 years of conservative efforts or as an issue that could swing voters to liberal candidates; there's evidence for both. Entering an election year, the transparency Jodi brings to one of our most hallowed institutions–one that may face serious tests this year–is unmissable.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

National Police Association

The Atlanta Falcons somehow managed to blow their lead in a 31-28 loss to the Minnesota Vikings in Week 9. The Vikings working with a brand new quarterback in Josh Dobbs were able to generate explosive plays both via the air and on the ground thanks to Dobb's mobility to gash the Falcons defense. Host Aaron Freeman breaks down how the team managed to lose a game like this.He also evaluates Falcons quarterback Taylor Heinicke's first start of the year and discusses if he did enough to keep the job and should be considered an upgrade over former starter Desmond Ridder. He discusses the Falcons run game's strong finish despite a rocky start, and the sloppy play from other sectors of the Falcons offense.Later, Aaron discusses head coach Arthur Smith's job security and if the quarterback change and disappointing consecutive losses put him on a warmer seat. Aaron breaks down what Smith and the team need to do over the next eight games to cool things down and get their season back on track before talking about some positive performances from KhaDarel Hodge and Jonnu Smith.Part of the @LockedOnATLFollow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms…

The Atlanta Falcons somehow managed to blow their lead in a 31-28 loss to the Minnesota Vikings in Week 9. The Vikings working with a brand new quarterback in Josh Dobbs were able to generate explosive plays both via the air and on the ground thanks to Dobb's mobility to gash the Falcons defense. Host Aaron Freeman breaks down how the team managed to lose a game like this. He also evaluates Falcons quarterback Taylor Heinicke's first start of the year and discusses if he did enough to keep the job and should be considered an upgrade over former starter Desmond Ridder. He discusses the Falcons run game's strong finish despite a rocky start, and the sloppy play from other sectors of the Falcons offense. Later, Aaron discusses head coach Arthur Smith's job security and if the quarterback change and disappointing consecutive losses put him on a warmer seat. Aaron breaks down what Smith and the team need to do over the next eight games to cool things down and get their season back on track before talking about some positive performances from KhaDarel Hodge and Jonnu Smith. Part of the @LockedOnATL Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms…

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade no doubt impacted countless people in the U.S. But there are even some far-reaching impacts in other countries. Bergen Cooper, Director of Policy research with Fòs Feminista, talks to us about a new organizational report that details Dobb's ripple effects around the world. We also hear from Sharon Vilegwa, Daniel Arango, Dr. Souvik Pyne, and Ijeoma Egwuatu, global partners with Fòs Feminista, about how the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision has resulted in on-the-ground impacts in Colombia, Kenya, India, and Nigeria.  After the Dobbs ruling, there has been an increase in misinformation and negative narratives surrounding abortion, as well as the review of safe abortion as a constitutional right in Kenya. In Colombia, anti-rights actors feel empowered by Roe's overturning. Myths and stigma surrounding safe abortion continues to ramp up in India. Dobbs has been used to support arguments against safe abortion legal guidelines in Nigeria. While Dobbs does not have legal impacts abroad, its effects bolster the anti-abortion and anti-rights movement.  LINKS FROM THIS EPISODEFòs Feminista on Twitter Fòs Feminista on FacebookThe Global Impact of the Dobbs Decision on Abortion Laws, Policies, Legislation, Narratives, and Movements: Findings from Colombia, India, Kenya, and Nigeria Plan C Abortionfinder.org Ineedana.com Repro Legal Helpline Repro Legal Defense Fund Digital Defense Fund Take Action:  Make sure to follow Fòs Feminista on Twitter and Facebook and stay up-to-date on their work. Dive deeper into the new report-- The Global Impact of the Dobbs Decision on Abortion Laws, Policies, Legislation, Narratives, and Movements: Findings from Colombia, India, Kenya, and Nigeria -- featuring reflections from Colombia, Kenya, India, and Nigeria. Support the showFollow Us on Social: Twitter: @rePROsFightBack Instagram: @reprosfbFacebook: rePROs Fight Back Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.comRate and Review on Apple PodcastThanks for listening & keep fighting back!

In this episode, a panel of libertarian and conservative scholars—J. Joel Alicea of the Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law, Anastasia Boden of the Cato Institute, and Sherif Girgis of Notre Dame Law School—explore the different strands of originalism as a constitutional methodology. They also explore the Roberts Court's application of originalism in recent cases, and how originalism intersects with textualism and other interpretive approaches. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. This program was originally streamed live on June 28, 2023.    Additional Resources  Moore v. Harper (2023)  New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen (2023)  Grutter v. Bollinger (2002)  District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)  Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)  Counterman v. Colorado (2023)   J. Joel Alicea, “The Moral Authority of Original Meaning,” Notre Dame Law Review (2022)   Joel Alicea, “Originalism and the Rule of the Dead,” National Affairs (2022)  Sherif Girgis,  “Living Traditionalism,” N.Y.U. L.Rev (2023)  Sherif Gergis, “Dobb's History and the future of Abortion Laws,” SCOTUSblog (2022)  Anastasia Boden, “Supreme Court's Sidestep Leaves Native Kids Without Answers,” Volokh Conspiracy (June 2023)  Anastasia Boden, “Discourse: Irrational Basis,” Pacific Legal Foundation, (August 2022)    Stay Connected and Learn More  Continue the conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.  Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.  Please subscribe to Live at the National Constitution Center and our companion podcast We the People on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or your favorite podcast app. 

Jen Psaki discusses the sudden end to the Russian armed rebellion led by the Wagner group and the future of Putin's regime with Former US Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, Former NATO Commander James Stavridis, Atlantic staff writer, Anne Applebaum, and Michigan Representative Elissa Slotkin.Also, in an exclusive interview, Jen sits down with Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi to talk about the one year anniversary of the Dobb's decision to ban access to abortion and the future of reproductive healthcare under Republican leadership.Check out our social pages below:https://twitter.com/InsideWithPsakihttps://www.instagram.com/InsideWithPsaki/https://www.tiktok.com/@insidewithpsakihttps://www.msnbc.com/jen-psaki

It's really oh, what a year. Cause it's been about a year since the Supreme Court's Dobb's decision, overturning Roe and essentially leaving states free to outlaw abortion. Sarah Garza Resnick, CEO of Personnel Pac, and Ben talk about the political and medical ramifications. Are the justices having second thoughts? How will the decision impact 2024 presidential election? What's sounder—Justice Alito's Dobb's decision or his explanation for flying for free on his billionaire friend's private plane? And more…See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Reporter covering Supreme Court, Politics & Democracy at Mother Jones, Pema Levy explains that the Dobb's leak didn't wreck the Supreme Court - the Justice's Scandals Did...A year ago, conservatives complained of a betrayal of justice. Since then, they've been ignoring plenty. Also Executive Director-Social Security Works Alex Lawson reveals that Social Security was just voted down by 217 Republicans. Alex Lawson knows how we can save it but we have to work together. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

How is it that Mifepristone was approved in the first place?  The drug has high risk implications and because of that was authorized under a specific protocol that the Biden administration is now trying to change after the Dobb's decision last year that reversed Roe v. Wade.  Guest Rik Mehta comes onto the podcast to discuss the legal nature of it all.

How is it that Mifepristone was approved in the first place?  The drug has high risk implications and because of that was authorized under a specific protocol that the Biden administration is now trying to change after the Dobb's decision last year that reversed Roe v. Wade.  Guest Rik Mehta comes onto the podcast to discuss the legal nature of it all.

Ping is joined this week with Jeff Emig and they sit down with 125 World Champion James Dobb.  James became world champion after years of racing in both the US and Europe, he is the last Brit to win a World Championship.  Today James is a proud father and husband living in the UK.  Sit back and enjoy!!

This is a rare opportunity to be a fly on the wall of a medical conference and hear two lectures from nationally acclaimed experts!  Melissa A. Simon, MD MPH is an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine and is Vice Chair of Research in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. She is the Founder and Director of the Center for Health Equity Transformation and the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative. Dr. Simon will be discussing women's health care in view of the recent Dobb's decision.  Twitter: @DrMelissa Simon LinkedIn: 2Melissa-simon https://www.feinberg.northwestern.edu/faculty-profiles/az/profile.html?xid=16856 Fenwa Milhouse MD is a Chicago based urologist and pelvic reconstructive surgeon, who uses social media to destigmatize pelvic floor & sexual conditions, as well as demonstrate the importance of representation in medicine. Dr. Milhouse will be speaking about equity in sexual health medicine in underserved populations as well as systemic racism in medical education.  IG: @drmilhouse TIKTOK @yourfavoriteurologist Twitter: @FMilhouseMD Website: www.yourfavoriteurologist.com The Black Women's Health Imperative- nonprofit organization created by Black women to help advance the health and wellness of Black girls and women. https://bwhi.org/ Episode 26: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Health Care, and Why it Matters with Dr. Fenwa Milhouse Lauren Streicher, MD is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, and the founding medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Medicine and Menopause. She is a certified menopause practitioner of the North American Menopause Society.                    Sign up to receive DR. STREICHER'S FREE NEWSLETTER Dr. Streicher is the medical correspondent for Chicago's top-rated news program, the WGN Morning News, and has been seen on The Today Show, Good Morning America, The Oprah Winfrey Show, CNN, NPR, Dr. Radio, Nightline, Fox and Friends, The Steve Harvey Show, CBS This Morning, ABC News Now, NBCNightlyNews,20/20, and World News Tonight. She is an expert source for many magazines and serves on the medical advisory board of The Kinsey Institute, Self Magazine, and Prevention Magazine. She writes a regular column for The Ethel by AARP and Prevention Magazine.  Sign Up to receive  Dr. Streicher's Free Newsletter:   Subscribe and Follow Dr. Streicher on  DrStreicher.com Instagram @DrStreich Twitter     @DrStreicher Facebook  @DrStreicher YouTube  DrStreicherTV Books by Lauren Streicher, MD  Slip Sliding Away: Turning Back the Clock on Your Vagina-A gynecologist's guide to eliminating post-menopause dryness and pain Hot Flash Hell: A Gynecologist's Guide to Turning Down the Heat Sex Rx- Hormones, Health, and Your Best Sex Ever The Essential Guide to Hysterectomy

Dobbs has been decided. There is no more need for compromise. Or is there? Pro-lifers seeking to keep their losing streak alive petition congress and demand unequal justice. We dissect The Heritage Foundation letter in this episode of The Liberator Podcast.

Lucas sits in for Mickey as he and Blaine grade Josh Dobb's first career start for the Titans. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lucas sits in for Mickey as he and Blaine grade Josh Dobb's first career start for the Titans. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today InPerspective with Dr. Harry Reeder November 16, 2022

11/4/22 7am CT Hour John, Glen and Sarah remind listeners to vote Tuesday and chat about North Korea firing missals, Astros win in Game 5 of World Series and National Men Dinner Day Jack joins in the conversation of being the underdog in the World Series and gives his prediction of how the 2022 world Series will end. Mary shares how abortion numbers have slightly decreased since the overturn of Roe and what states can do to support pregnant women so more choose life. Marcel explains that we often have a renters mentality when it comes to our parish and encourages everyone to have an owners mentality so we take greater stock in our local parish so it can thrive and us along with it.

Jim Jordan- Watching Dems panic as a result of Elon Musk taking over Twitter. Don't want Musk to silence left. Just want to make it a fair debate. JD Vance is up in polls by a comfortable lead. Jordan seems confident Republicans are going to win this election. People are tired of cancel culture, gas prices and inflation. Crime is a top issue, Dems trying to spin that increase in crime rates is a red state issue, not based by Dem run city. Paul Pelosi…media is promoting can't go after Nancy because of attack. Jordan feels American people have common sense and they want to see him recover. Americans are intelligent enough that they can discriminate between HER politics and the misfortune that happened to her.   Steve Cortes- Former Trump Advisor Believes Vance will bring this country back to where it belongs. People who are on the fence, need to know he's a thoroughly conservative man and he will be a political disruptor. He will be a fighter in Washington. Pelosi and her policies have inflicted pain among the American people. We know very little about attack. The initial narrative makes little sense. The one way to know the truth is to get full subpoena power. We have a right and a duty to know, in her being 3rd line to the presidency. Jolene Austin-Republican candidate for district 14 Urging voters to get out and vote on the 8th. Republicans are energized. She believes in strong conservative values. Anti-Vaxer for Covid. Endorsed by Mike DeWine, she actually campaigned for Renacci. Need people to get in office and say enough is enough on bad policies that have been instituted. Fighting to keep jobs in Ohio. Husband has lost union job, due to them being shipped overseas under Tim Ryan. Molly Smith- President of Cleveland Right to Life Overwhelmed by Dobb's decision on Roe V Wade, believes this ruling was by the Grace of God. It all comes down to how you vote. Feels pro choice people are embarrassed by actions of extreme left. Abortion issue, is over played hand by the Democratic Party. Whole focus of heartbeat bill is to protect the interest of mother and the child. The left will say any lie, to keep abortion legal until the time of birth. It's not about women's health care. It's about ending life of a child. There are a number of ways to deal with unplanned pregnancies. Resources are in place. Women are being encouraged to seek abortions without any medical assistance, by taking the abortion pill.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Associate Director Dana Humphrey speaks with Gretchen Ely, PhD, MSW, a professor at the University of Tennessee Knoxville's College of Social Work whose research focuses on access to reproductive healthcare. In the wake of the Supreme Court's Dobb's Decision which overturned Roe V. Wade and ruled that there is no constitutional right to abortion in the U.S., the landscape of reproductive healthcare has changed dramatically. Dr. Ely discusses the impact the decision is having on college students and concerns that she and other experts have about increased barriers to abortion care.

Today Jay tackles the polls, which show that the Republicans are in big trouble after June's wildly unpopular Dobb's decision. Suzanne helps us understand the online backlash against the new Netflix release, ‘Dahmer'. Then, Suzanne and Jay detail their entirely too close for comfort connections with Wisconsin serial killers. Especially their schoolmate: The Bone Breaker Killer. Medium - Joe Clark - The Bone Breaker Killer: https://medium.com/@crimewaffles/joe-clark-the-bone-breaker-killer-25f24c24306cMashable - Why Netflix's ‘Dahmer' series has sparked a backlash online: https://mashable.com/article/jeffery-dahmer-netflix-backlash-criticism-whyFiveThirtyEight  - Latest Polls: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/Want more Brand New Information? Connect with us on Instagram @brandnewinformationpod + on Twitter @brandnewinfopodPlus! Follow Jay on Instagram & Twitter, and Suzanne on Instagram! 

Today, on Karl and Crew Mornings, we continued our weekly theme: "Love Like Jesus", and we discussed compassion. Jesus had deep compassion for the hurt, the helpless, and the harassed. The scripture reference was Matthew 9:36. Compassion isn't always easy. When did you have a heart-shift and where? What area did you go from contempt or condemnation to Christ-filled compassion and love? One of our guests was Amy Gehrke (Executive Director with Illinois Right to Life). She shared the latest in the Roe vs. Wade and Dobb decisions; plus, hope in helping the unborn. We also welcomed author and adoption advocate, Susan TeBos. Her latest book is called, "We've Been There: True Stories, Surprising Insights, and Aha Moments for Adopted Teens". You can listen to the highlights of today's program on the Karl and Crew Showcast. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is our return-from-hiatus episode. Jordan Schneider kicks things off by recapping passage of a major U.S. semiconductor-building subsidy bill, while new contributor Brian Fleming talks with Nick Weaver about new regulatory investment restrictions and new export controls on (artificial Intelligence (AI) chips going to China. Jordan also covers a big corruption scandal arising from China's big chip-building subsidy program, leading me to wonder when we'll have our version. Brian and Nick cover the month's biggest cryptocurrency policy story, the imposition of OFAC sanctions on Tornado Cash. They agree that, while the outer limits of sanctions aren't entirely clear, they are likely to show that sometimes the U.S. Code actually does trump the digital version. Nick points listeners to his bracing essay, OFAC Around and Find Out. Paul Rosenzweig reprises his role as the voice of reason in the debate over location tracking and Dobbs. (Literally. Paul and I did an hour-long panel on the topic last week. It's available here.) I reprise my role as Chief Privacy Skeptic, calling the Dobb/location fuss an overrated tempest in a teapot. Brian takes on one aspect of the Mudge whistleblower complaint about Twitter security: Twitter's poor record at keeping foreign spies from infiltrating its workforce and getting unaudited access to its customer records. In a coincidence, he notes, a former Twitter employee was just convicted of “spying lite”, proves it's as good at national security as it is at content moderation. Meanwhile, returning to U.S.-China economic relations, Jordan notes the survival of high-level government concerns about TikTok. I note that, since these concerns first surfaced in the Trump era, TikTok's lobbying efforts have only grown more sophisticated. Speaking of which, Klon Kitchen has done a good job of highlighting DJI's increasingly sophisticated lobbying in Washington D.C. The Cloudflare decision to deplatform Kiwi Farms kicks off a donnybrook, with Paul and Nick on one side and me on the other. It's a classic Cyberlaw Podcast debate.  In quick hits and updates: Nick and I cover the sad story of the Dad who photographed his baby's private parts at a doctor's request and, thanks to Google's lack of human appellate review, lost his email, his phone number, and all of the accounts that used the phone for 2FA.  Paul brings us up to speed on the U.S.-EU data fight: and teases tomorrow's webinar on the topic. Nick explains the big changes likely to come to the pornography world because of a lawsuit against Visa. And why Twitter narrowly averted its own child sex scandal.  I note that Google's bias against GOP fundraising emails has led to an unlikely result: less spam filtering for all such emails.  And, after waiting too long, Brian Krebs retracts the post about a Ubiquity “breach” that led the company to sue him.

This is our return-from-hiatus episode. Jordan Schneider kicks things off by recapping passage of a major U.S. semiconductor-building subsidy bill, while new contributor Brian Fleming talks with Nick Weaver about new regulatory investment restrictions and new export controls on (artificial Intelligence (AI) chips going to China. Jordan also covers a big corruption scandal arising from China's big chip-building subsidy program, leading me to wonder when we'll have our version. Brian and Nick cover the month's biggest cryptocurrency policy story, the imposition of OFAC sanctions on Tornado Cash. They agree that, while the outer limits of sanctions aren't entirely clear, they are likely to show that sometimes the U.S. Code actually does trump the digital version. Nick points listeners to his bracing essay, OFAC Around and Find Out. Paul Rosenzweig reprises his role as the voice of reason in the debate over location tracking and Dobbs. (Literally. Paul and I did an hour-long panel on the topic last week. It's available here.) I reprise my role as Chief Privacy Skeptic, calling the Dobb/location fuss an overrated tempest in a teapot. Brian takes on one aspect of the Mudge whistleblower complaint about Twitter security: Twitter's poor record at keeping foreign spies from infiltrating its workforce and getting unaudited access to its customer records. In a coincidence, he notes, a former Twitter employee was just convicted of “spying lite”, proves it's as good at national security as it is at content moderation. Meanwhile, returning to U.S.-China economic relations, Jordan notes the survival of high-level government concerns about TikTok. I note that, since these concerns first surfaced in the Trump era, TikTok's lobbying efforts have only grown more sophisticated. Speaking of which, Klon Kitchen has done a good job of highlighting DJI's increasingly sophisticated lobbying in Washington D.C. The Cloudflare decision to deplatform Kiwi Farms kicks off a donnybrook, with Paul and Nick on one side and me on the other. It's a classic Cyberlaw Podcast debate.  In quick hits and updates: Nick and I cover the sad story of the Dad who photographed his baby's private parts at a doctor's request and, thanks to Google's lack of human appellate review, lost his email, his phone number, and all of the accounts that used the phone for 2FA.  Paul brings us up to speed on the U.S.-EU data fight: and teases tomorrow's webinar on the topic. Nick explains the big changes likely to come to the pornography world because of a lawsuit against Visa. And why Twitter narrowly averted its own child sex scandal.  I note that Google's bias against GOP fundraising emails has led to an unlikely result: less spam filtering for all such emails.  And, after waiting too long, Brian Krebs retracts the post about a Ubiquity “breach” that led the company to sue him.

Just about everyone knows about the infamous "bathroom bill" of 2016, however many don't know that Rep. John Autry was then a Charlotte City Councilman who successfully pushed for the city's non-discrimination ordinance that prompted HB2 that year.   The Mecklenburg County Democrat talks about why pushing for the ordinance was so important to him.  He also takes listeners on a life journey that began in Fayetteville and took him across the country through multiple military posts, careers, and experiences.   Skye and Brian also discuss the effect SCOTUS's Dobb's decision is having on political messaging in North Carolina, the latest on the Leandro lawsuit, an expected decision on a NC Senate candidate's residency status, 2024 rumors, and more.   The Do Politics Better podcast is sponsored by New Frame, the NC Travel Industry Association, and the NC Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association.   

What language has two stacks? What language is used on satellites and in home computers? What language deals in words? Why, Forth, of course! Forth is a highly unique language developed in the 60s by Chuck Moore. And when I say unique, I mean unique. Forth uses reverse polish notation for all operations, along with a dedicated data stack for passing parameters. But it's not just unique for the fun of it, Forth's design is highly deliberate. It offers a level of simplicity and power that's rarely seen in programming languages. Selected Sources: http://www.forth.org/POL.pdf - Moore's Programming a Problem Oriented Language https://www.1strecon.org/downloads/Forth_Resources/CM_ForthLanguageInteractiveComputing_1970.pdf - Early paper discussing Forth https://archive.org/details/1985-10-dr-dobbs-journal/page/41/mode/1up - Dobb's Journal article on the NX4000

Get ready for all the answers to your gynecology questions and to hear the personal and professional menstrual experiences of one badass gynecological surgeon.  Meenal joins me to share her passion and knowledge. She's here to remind us that you have the right to be comfortable and if your gynecologist doesn't take you seriously- get a new one. Links to sources and resources mentioned are below the Topics Covered list. Topics covered: - menarche- menstrual education- moving from the pill to an IUD- how Meenal chose gynecology within the medical field- abortion care and access - impacts of Roe v. Wade overturn on emergency care- what is adenomyosis?- clarifications on endometriosis - what to look for in a gynecologist- who is the gynecologist's gynecologist? - what to do if you think you have endometriosis-  research on non-invasive diagnostics for endometriosis- new products using biomarkers - recommendations of awesome researchers to follow - a lesser-known way to half your menstrual bleeding- the fact that your menstrual blood is not a fixed amount - you do not need to groom for the gynecologist - terminology in quote unquote women's health  - period sex shame- ways to make the IUD insertion process more comfortable - how a copper IUD works - the undercompensating of OB-GYN professionals - medical misogyny - fertility planning - Meenal's hopes for current and future menstruators Links to sources and resources:Louise Perkins King on ethical health care post Dobb's NPR interview with Dr. Linda G. GriffithArticle on the pay gap in gynecology Medical Bondage by Dr. Dierdre Cooper OwensHow we fail black patients in painBlack Americans systemically undertreated for painRacial bias in pain assessments Black women on pain and implicit bias in medicine Study on copper IUDs implanted after 35 remaining in until menopauseSubscribe for new episodes each full moon!If you like what you hear, leave a rating or review on Apple Podcast or wherever you get your podcasts so others can find us and have a chance to listen!Considering a menstrual cup? Check out Lunette (https://store.lunette.com/?rfsn=4709896.1507ef)Reach out: dreamspring.life@gmail.com

Imagine you are given a month and a half head start on a race. Do you A) start running, B) wait around until the official start time to run, or C) act surprised when the race starts and chastise any of your teammates who tell you that it's time to start running? If you chose C, congratulations, you are the Democratic Party responding to the Dobb decision!Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. If you're not a Patreon member, you're not hearing every episode! To get exclusive Patreon-only episodes, discounts on merch, access to our Slack community, and more, join at patreon.com/fivefourpod. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Policy expert and author Thann Bennett talks about the news and politics of the day. He covers the continuing effects of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dobb's case, the mid-term election, the economy, and also takes a look at 1 Samuel 15. Thann's book is “My Fame, His Fame: Aiming Your Life and Influence Toward the Glory of God.”

On this West Virginia Morning, state legislatures across the Ohio Valley are considering a variety of anti-LGBTQ policies, and the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobb's decision has some worried about an erosion of rights for gay and trans people. But as Katie Myers of the Ohio Valley ReSource reports, last month's pride celebrations showed a celebration of identities, from the region's largest cities to smallest towns.

The Supreme Court of the United States has been active in releasing its rulings, and our team wants to look into these cases. With a deep look into the overarching philosophy of these decisions, the Gwartney team jumps into abortion, freedom of religion, and 2nd amendment cases. Join us in a riveting conversation about the current political landscape. Timeline: Modern Conservative Philosophy / 6:00 Dissolves Federalism? / 10:45 Religious Liberty / 18:00 Decrease in Waste / 22:00 Public Reaction to Dobb / 26:35 On the Margin / 31:40 Corey DeAngelist for research on school choice

This week Erica joins from an undisclosed location not far from the U.S. Supreme Court.  Here in Washington State, elected officials have been busy reacting to the court's recent rulings, especially the Dobb's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.  Can Seattle save us from this Supreme Court? How about Governor Inslee? If you like Seattle Nice, where respectful and heated debate is still encouraged, please help support the pod on Patreon. https://patreon.com/seattlenice?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=creatorshare Support the show

June 24 changed our lives. The Supreme Court's “Dobb's decision” overturned Roe v. Wade, stating women no longer have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. In this episode, Twilio's Hannah Poteat, Quora's Lena Ghamrawi , and Asana's Whitney Merrill discuss what this means for women and what we, as privacy professionals, can and should do to stop the erosion of human rights in the U.S.

In Today's episode of "Moment of Truth," Saurabh and Nick sit down with Josh Craddock, Lawyer and Affiliated Scholar at the James Wilson Institute, to discuss the history of abortion law in the United States, the legal arguments from the majority opinion, concurrences, and dissent in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the future of the pro-life movement, and the implications of the Dobb's decision which overturned Roe v. Wade.Josh Craddock, a 2019 James Wilson fellow and newly named Affiliated Scholar. In the past, he worked at Bancroft PLLC, and clerked for Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. At Harvard Law School, he led the Journal of Law & Public Policy as its editor-in-chief. He has been a contributor to National Review, First Things, Public Discourse and Providence Magazine. Craddock holds a B.A. in politics, philosophy and economics from The King's College and a J.D. from the Harvard Law School.Learn more about Josh Craddock's work:http://joshcraddock.comhttp://commentary.jameswilsoninstitute.org/2020/03/fellowship-alumni-spotlight-josh-craddock-19/https://twitter.com/joshjcraddock––––––Follow American Moment across Social Media:Twitter – https://twitter.com/AmMomentOrgFacebook – https://www.facebook.com/AmMomentOrgInstagram – https://www.instagram.com/ammomentorg/YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4qmB5DeiFxt53ZPZiW4TcgRumble – https://rumble.com/c/c-695775Check out AmCanon:https://www.americanmoment.org/amcanon/Follow Us on Twitter:Saurabh Sharma – https://twitter.com/ssharmaUSNick Solheim – https://twitter.com/NickSSolheimAmerican Moment's "Moment of Truth" Podcast is recorded at the Conservative Partnership Center in Washington DC, produced by American Moment Studios, and edited by Jake Mercier and Jared Cummings.Subscribe to our Podcast, "Moment of Truth"Apple Podcasts – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/moment-of-truth/id1555257529Spotify – https://open.spotify.com/show/5ATl0x7nKDX0vVoGrGNhAj Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Terry Mattingly of GetReligion Pop Goes Religion: Faith in Popular Culture GetReligion.org

With the Supreme Court leak this week of the Dobb's decision, Dr. Grazie Christie chats with TCA colleagues Ashley McGuire and Maureen Ferguson about this unprecedented moment, why Justice Alito's reasoning is a courageous gift to American children, and how we can best mobilize to help women choose life. Franciscan University president Father Dave Pivonka joins at the bottom of the hour sharing why biology matters and the dangers of gender ideology--especially within collegiate sports. Father Roger Landry also offers us an inspiring homily for this Sunday's Gospel. Catch the show every Saturday at 7amET/5pmET on EWTN radio.