Podcast appearances and mentions of justice ginsberg

Today's Morning Show is the first to air during Women's History Month 2025. Part One: Laura Semmer, illustrator of "The ABC's of Women's History," a lovely children's book written by Rio Cortez. Part Two: from the Morning Show archives .... Bryant Johnson, who was the personal trainer of former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, talks about working with the late justice in his book "The RBG Workout- How She Stays Strong - and You Can Too!" Justice Ginsberg began working out with Johnson while recovering from a serious bout with cancer.

Since long before Roe v Wade enshrined a federal right to choose in 1973, abortion has been one of the most contentious issues in American life. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe with their decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, marking  a new peak in the political energy and emotion surrounding abortion. Katie's guest today, New York Times journalist Jodi Kantor (who won a Pulitzer for her Me Too reporting), has been behind some of the most exhaustively sourced and in-depth reporting on just how Dobbs unfolded.    As Jodi tells us, in many ways, SCOTUS' Dobb's decision was shocking. The case started as a long-shot ban on abortions after 15-weeks in Mississippi. But a series of events made it one of the most monumental in American history: an even more controversial case from Texas coming along at the same time, Justice Ginsberg's death, and an unprecedented leak of the decision in Dobbs that some feel affected Justices' ability to deliberate fully. It's easy to imagine this going differently if even one of those things changed.   Roe's reversal could be interpreted as the triumphant fruition of 50 years of conservative efforts or as an issue that could swing voters to liberal candidates; there's evidence for both. Entering an election year, the transparency Jodi brings to one of our most hallowed institutions–one that may face serious tests this year–is unmissable.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this session of Channeling History, we channel a discussion between the spirits of Justice Scalia and Justice Ginsberg. They talk about topics of current interest to all of us. If you like what you see, please subscribe to our channel and tell your friends 

A legendary Supreme Court reporter's new book describes her relationship with the late Justice Ginsberg, and the common experiences of misogyny that they shared. On Today's Show:Nina Totenberg, NPR legal correspondent and the author of Dinners with Ruth: A Memoir on the Power of Friendships (Simon & Schuster, 2022), looks back on her 50-year friendship with the woman who would become a Supreme Court Justice and how they each fought to overcome barriers and face personal challenges.

We have finally reached the end of the 2022 Gay Anthems For A New Generation series and this last set doesn't hold back. Once again, in an effort to contemporize this batch — I went back the past 10 years and mixed in some newer gay anthems that when mixed in with older classics that have been re-worked for today's dancefloors make the effort feel fresh and contemporary. I even took the opportunity to throw in a couple of recent tech-house tracks that sample the gay anthems 'The Underground' by Celeda and 'Work' by Masters At Work' breathing new life into these near 20 yeard old floor-scorchers. No stone was left unturned in this series and pouring through decades of modernized classics (some outstanding while others not so much) was a daunting task that occupied the majority of the work involved in creating these sets. I dare you to find any compilation as comprehensive anywhere on Spotify or Apple Music because you won't. In short, bitches can't touch this but plenty will be none too happy to pass it off as their own. I digress. What's weighing heavily on my mind these days is the move towards an authoritarian state. Our system of government is dysfunctional. The electoral college, which gives outsized weight to the minority allows them to dictate against the wishes of the majority. The great American experiment is coming to a decisive end unless we turn this ship around in November. Even when we have the numbers to get significant legislation passed like gun control, universal healthcare, lower prescription drug costs, affordable housing, mental health resources, food assistance, and free local college tuition or trade schools — Democrats are continually stymied by an ancient artifact called the filibuster in the evenly divided Senate with Vice President Kamala Harris providing the tie-breaking vote. Originally, the filibuster was implemented to allow the Senate to be a more deliberative body of the two branches of government. You had to stand and talk for hours on end to slow down a piece of legislation. Now, you can phone your objection in from your office without even walking your lazy ass to the well of the Senate. The filibuster has been wielded as a sword against progress and prevents passing laws that benefit society as a whole. It was never intended to be used as a way to stop progress. In the case of Democrats, we have a one-seat advantage in the Senate and because of two Senators with a (D) in front of them — they refuse to suspend the filibuster to get the people's agenda enacted. Mind you, the filibuster is nowhere in the Constitution and was implemented after the Civil War to ensure that the minority was trampled over in legislation. Now, it's having the opposite effect of its original intent. Most recently, simple gun control measures can only be passed with a 60 vote threshold in the Senate because two Democratic Senators are attempting to uphold the traditions of the Senate. Meanwhile. seriously mentally defective people continue to legally purchase weapons of war and use them against innocent citizens including children. As long as members of Congress are beholden to special interests (think NRA) and unfettered money pours into campaigns and PACS with virtually zero accountability — our government will remain broken and beyond repair. The filibuster was suspended twice by Republicans to shove through two Supreme Court Justice nominations giving conservatives a majority on the court. One of these nominees was only after Mitch McConnell (the Senate Leader) upheld Obama's nomination for 9 months to replace Justice Scalito after his untimely death under the guise that no Justice should be nominated in an election year. His gamble paid off and Trump won the election that year and was able to get Justice Gorsuch confirmed to SCOTUS with a simple majority. At the end of Trump's term, Justice Ginsberg passed away and Mitch McConnell rammed through Justice (handmaiden) Amy Coney Barrett right w...

We have finally reached the end of the 2022 Gay Anthems For A New Generation series and this last set doesn't hold back. Once again, in an effort to contemporize this batch — I went back the past 10 years and mixed in some newer gay anthems that when mixed in with older classics that have been re-worked for today's dancefloors make the effort feel fresh and contemporary. I even took the opportunity to throw in a couple of recent tech-house tracks that sample the gay anthems 'The Underground' by Celeda and 'Work' by Masters At Work' breathing new life into these near 20 yeard old floor-scorchers. No stone was left unturned in this series and pouring through decades of modernized classics (some outstanding while others not so much) was a daunting task that occupied the majority of the work involved in creating these sets. I dare you to find any compilation as comprehensive anywhere on Spotify or Apple Music because you won't. In short, bitches can't touch this but plenty will be none too happy to pass it off as their own. I digress. What's weighing heavily on my mind these days is the move towards an authoritarian state. Our system of government is dysfunctional. The electoral college, which gives outsized weight to the minority allows them to dictate against the wishes of the majority. The great American experiment is coming to a decisive end unless we turn this ship around in November. Even when we have the numbers to get significant legislation passed like gun control, universal healthcare, lower prescription drug costs, affordable housing, mental health resources, food assistance, and free local college tuition or trade schools — Democrats are continually stymied by an ancient artifact called the filibuster in the evenly divided Senate with Vice President Kamala Harris providing the tie-breaking vote. Originally, the filibuster was implemented to allow the Senate to be a more deliberative body of the two branches of government. You had to stand and talk for hours on end to slow down a piece of legislation. Now, you can phone your objection in from your office without even walking your lazy ass to the well of the Senate. The filibuster has been wielded as a sword against progress and prevents passing laws that benefit society as a whole. It was never intended to be used as a way to stop progress. In the case of Democrats, we have a one-seat advantage in the Senate and because of two Senators with a (D) in front of them — they refuse to suspend the filibuster to get the people's agenda enacted. Mind you, the filibuster is nowhere in the Constitution and was implemented after the Civil War to ensure that the minority was trampled over in legislation. Now, it's having the opposite effect of its original intent. Most recently, simple gun control measures can only be passed with a 60 vote threshold in the Senate because two Democratic Senators are attempting to uphold the traditions of the Senate. Meanwhile. seriously mentally defective people continue to legally purchase weapons of war and use them against innocent citizens including children. As long as members of Congress are beholden to special interests (think NRA) and unfettered money pours into campaigns and PACS with virtually zero accountability — our government will remain broken and beyond repair. The filibuster was suspended twice by Republicans to shove through two Supreme Court Justice nominations giving conservatives a majority on the court. One of these nominees was only after Mitch McConnell (the Senate Leader) upheld Obama's nomination for 9 months to replace Justice Scalito after his untimely death under the guise that no Justice should be nominated in an election year. His gamble paid off and Trump won the election that year and was able to get Justice Gorsuch confirmed to SCOTUS with a simple majority. At the end of Trump's term, Justice Ginsberg passed away and Mitch McConnell rammed through Justice (handmaiden) Amy Coney Barrett right w...

Justice Ginsberg Was Not 100% On Roe V Wade/ May. 4. 2022 (Larry Conners is Paul Harvey with an Edge) Hour One of Larry Conners USA:  Senator Cruz says leak has done incredible damage to the SCOTUS.  Justice Ginsberg said that she was not 100% on-board with Roe v Wade.  Is Trump helping endorsed candidates [...] The post Justice Ginsberg Was Not 100% On Roe V Wade/ 1 PM LC-USA 05-04-22 appeared first on Larry Conners USA.

The Supreme Court has had nine justices since 1869 but the Biden administration has set up a commission to study changes to the court including packing the court with additional justices. In this episode, we discuss the findings from that commission, Justice Ginsberg's thoughts on national anthem protestors, and the life and legacy of Justice Clarence Thomas after 30 years on the court. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/blurredpoliticallines/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/blurredpoliticallines/support

Chris opens the show commenting on the Ohio State Marching Band's tribute to Rush. In the second half hour, WUT Sports Intern Ryan Larson calls in for an update on UA Football, College Football, the NFL, AND some background into what generated the email leak of Jon Gruden's emails that lead to his resignation from Head Coach of the Las Vegas Raiders. To close out the hour, Chris comments on an article about Katie Couric admitting she edited her Ruth Bader Ginsburg interview to "protect" Justice Ginsberg from admitting why she opposed people kneeling for the National Anthem

Eli Savit is a nationally recognized attorney, public servant, and civil rights advocate who currently serves as the Washtenaw County Prosecutor. Prior to his term, he served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was a civil-rights and public-interest attorney, and also had a career as a public-school teacher. In addition to serving as Washtenaw County's Prosecuting Attorney, Eli is a faculty member at the University of Michigan Law School. Eli has been an integral part of several major, successful civil rights and environmental initiatives in Michigan and across the country, including a successful effort to have the Michigan Civil Rights Commission recognize discrimination claims against LGBTQIA+ Michiganders, and assisting New Jersey, Maryland, and Puerto Rico in their quests to hold corporate polluters responsible for waterway contamination. In this inspiring installment of Open Mike, Eli discusses his close relationship with late Justice Ginsberg, and how her tutelage helped inform his decision to carve out a career shaped by public service. Additionally, he and Mike consider the inherent problems with the American cash bail system (one of two for-profit bail systems in the world) and reflect on Eli's recent, successful elimination of Washtenaw County's cash bail program! Show Notes [00:09] Eli Savit's background and bio as Washtenaw County Prosecutor. [01:26] Welcome to the show, Eli! There was a prosecutor for how many years prior to you? [2:03] How was taking over an office from someone who had been there for twenty-eight years? [03:46] You were born and raised in Ann Arbor, went to U of M Law School, and were clerk for two United States Supreme Court Justices, is that right? Retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. That had to have been amazing — what was that like? [06:05] The same-sex marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges, wasn't that a Michigan case? [07:50] The way that last year went down with the former president getting that appointment… that was such a horrible way that went down, and I'm sure it was sad for Justice Ginsberg's legacy. Do you have any opinions on that? [10:50] After working as a clerk for two icons, you could have had any job that you wanted, ones that pay more lucratively. What was that thought process like? [12:46] The way you chose to run your campaign, one of radical inclusivity, was really impressive. When I read that, I wondered how you were going to make everyone happy — I've never heard of a campaign like that! Can you take us through that? [17:19] Let's talk about cash bail… last year, we filmed an episode with two young ladies who are reforming the system via Bail Project Detroit… it was such an eye-opening thing for me as an attorney. You're the first prosecutor I personally know who has eliminated cash bail. Could you explain to our viewers why you believe so strongly cash bail should be done away with? [25:57] Entire states are now abolishing cash bail. Washington D.C. got rid of it in 1992, and New Jersey got rid of it in 2017. Crime rates in New Jersey subsequently plummeted. [27:55] Research shows that people will still show up to court, even without cash bail as an incentive! Something like 90% of people show up to their court dates, either way. Is that what you're finding in Washtenaw? [30:42] After the bail situation, what are some other initiatives your office is working on? [31:09] On the first day of his term, Prosecutor Savit banned all zero-tolerance policies in favor of adopting a more holistic, case-by-case approach to various crimes and conditions under which they occurred. [36:00] On Open Mike, we've had at least ten guests who were wrongfully convicted. As a prosecutor, what does your office see as your role in helping to free innocent people who were wrongfully convicted in Washtenaw county? [40:28] There's a lot of discussion about blanket immunity which completely protects people from prosecution for crimes related to testimony they provide… what are your thoughts on blanket immunity for people who are bad actors in processes that result in wrongful convictions? [43:57] We see a ton of jail house snitches and bad IDs from police misconduct… have these two areas of potential problems been examined by your office? [47:18] Where did you teach in New York City? [48:28] You're doing so many amazing things in Washtenaw County, and I can't commend you enough. I know it's not easy, and I can't thank you enough for your service. We'll have you on in a year or two to touch base on all the incredible work you'll have undoubtedly done. Thank you again for being on Open Mike! [49:20] What a life, Eli is leading! Doing amazing things to change the criminal justice system for his constituents, and hopefully the world! Comment, like, and subscribe to Open Mike! We really appreciate you; stay tuned for new episodes coming up soon.

We open this segment with a recording of internationally acclaimed opera star Denyce Graves, singing "American Anthem" in the Rotunda of the US Capitol at the memorial service for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in September of last year. Justice Ginsberg was a big fan of opera, and a big fan of Denyce Graves, and in that regard the Justice is most certainly not alone. Denyce Graves has sung in the major opera houses and with the major symphony orchestras of the world. And as she continues to perform and teach, she has recently undertaken a project to restore the original home of the National Negro Opera Company, located in Pittsburgh, and to rescue from historical neglect the many influential African Americans who distinguished themselves in the world of opera. This week, she is at the Glimmerglass Festival, a longtime summer destination for opera lovers in upstate New York, appearing in a play with music about the founder of the National Negro Opera Company, Mary Cardwell-Dawson. Denyce Graves joins us on Zoom from Cooperstown, NY… See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Episode 11 of Notorious, we discussed the case of Craig v. Boren, in which Ruth Bader Ginsberg, an attorney for the ACLU, helped shape a new level of judicial review in gender discrimination cases, appearing as amicus curiae. In addressing Oklahoma laws that prevented young men, but not young women, from consuming low alcohol-content beer, the United States Supreme Court held that the gender classifications at issue were unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In making that determination, the Court found that the statistics relied on by the state were insufficient to show a substantial relationship between the statute and the benefits intended to stem from it.  As a result, the Court instituted a new standard of judicial review, "intermediate scrutiny" under which: (1) the state must prove the existence of specific important governmental objectives; and (2) the law must be substantially related to the achievement of those objectives. Justice Ginsberg, who would not join the Supreme Court, until 17 years later, influenced the outcome as an ACLU lawyer, appearing as amicus curiae, or a friend of the Court.  Ginsburg advocated on behalf of the male petitioner, arguing for striking down a law that discriminated against young men. Patterson Belknap attorneys, Michelle Bufano, Alejandro Cruz and Patricia Kim discuss this case and Justice Ginsburg's long legacy of fighting for equality for all.    Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg's writings, see Decisions and Dissents of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:  A Selection, edited by Corey Brettschneider. For more information about Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, see www.pbwt.com. For information about becoming a guest on Notorious, email Michelle Bufano. For questions or more information about Notorious, email Jenni Dickson. Also, check out the Patterson Belknap podcast, How to Build A Nation in 15 Weeks. Related People: Michelle Bufano Alejandro Cruz Patricia Kim

As we near the end of a very strange year, we thought we'd ask a couple of big thinkers to come on and have a no-holds-barred discussion on Legal Technology and Innovation. Kristin Hodgins is the Project Manager for Legal Innovation at Osler, Hoskins & Harcourt LLP in Toronto. Jason Wilson is a legal publisher and author who has worked at Thomson Reuters and O'Connor's Publishing for over 20 years. We cover topics ranging from who are the thought leaders and where is the best community for legal tech discussion, to what are courts, firms, academics, and vendors really doing to promote and achieve advancements in legal technology. So strap on your scuba tank and prepare for a deep dive with this week's guests. Information Inspirations Even NPR knows that "Waiting for the LSAT is too late for improving minority representation in law." Pipelines for minority and underrepresented portions of our society have to start much earlier than when they enter college or are thinking of applying for law schools. Justice Ginsberg has both a tea set named after her, as well as a building at Rutgers University. And if tea isn't your thing, how about a legal article from Kansas University's Law Dean on the making of a perfect pecan pie crust? Anyone who has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request knows they can be expensive. However, thanks to the American Association of Law Libraries, academic librarians may get a fee waiver from the US governmental agencies. So make sure you are on good terms with your academic law librarians! Listen, Subscribe, Comment Please take the time to rate and review us on Apple Podcast. Contact us anytime by tweeting us at @gebauerm or @glambert. Or, you can call The Geek in Review hotline at 713-487-7270 and leave us a message. You can email us at geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com. As always, the great music you hear on the podcast is from Jerry David DeCicca. Transcript

Episode Topic/Description: Author, Artist, Producer, Founder, and Host of TheRhyze! Podcast, Naje Badu, sits down with recurring guest, Attorney Michel Rene' Huff, to discuss the passing of Justice Ginsberg and the recent confirmation of her replacement, Amy Coney Barrett. The discussion also includes the impact Barrett's confirmation will have on our democracy, for generations to come. Voter suppression/intimidation, as well as, the social and political ramifications America will experience in the event Biden/Harris win the election or if the current President will be elected for another term. Brief information about the host: Naje Badu - Artist, Author (Let Go Of Your But! A Women's Guide to Self-Love and Fulfillment and the soon to be released anthology, Risen) and Creative Empowerment Coach who has 25+ years of experience with project management and product development. Episode Guests: Attorney, Michel Rene' Huff Support TheRhyze! via Cash App ☛ https://cash.app/$Naje2533 or via PayPal ☛https://www.paypal.me/therhyze Social Media: #TheRhyze #TheRhyzePodcast Share Your Story: We want to hear from you. If you think you or someone you know has a story that would be informative, inspiring, or empowering, we encourage you to make a brief recording of your story or topic suggestions for content for our podcast Reach Out To TheRhyze!: Facebook: TheRhyze! Group Page @TheRhyze or @NajeBadu Instagram: @TheRhyze Twitter (for live interaction) @TheRhyze Website: TheRhyze.com Email: Rhyze@TheRhyze.com Reach Out To Our Guest: Facebook: Michel Rene' Huff LinkedIn: Michel Rene' Huff Website: https://www.hufflegal.com/ @TheRhyze is a multimedia platform covered under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/therhyze/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/therhyze/support

We discuss Justice Ginsberg's Life, legacy, and the implications of her passing. This week's beer review includes the Brooklyn Pilsner and Black Cherry Mike's Hard Lemonade.

A full episode with homage to Justice Ginsberg, Full Metal Jacket, Young Einstein and an in depth interview with the creator of the skateboard across the country documentary, "Shred America".

Maintaining social distance, Catherine and Gail “get real”  as they reflect on the life of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. The duo discuss the impact Ruth had on America, and reflect on how it personally feels to lose a women's rights icon. Justice Ginsberg was a hero to many and her passing became the impromptu topic of Women Over 70's September Zoom Gathering. You're invited to join Catherine and Gail and a lively group of women from across the country at our next Zoom Gathering on October 20th at 11:30 a.m. CT. To RSVP email info@womenover70.com. #wo70zoomgathering Connect with Gail & Catherine: Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/Wo70AgingReimagined Instagram: WomenOver70 Website:https://womenover70.com Email: info@womenover70.com Show: Women Over 70 – Aging Reimagined Listen on: Apple Play, Stitcher, Please rate our show and subscribe wherever you listen. This is how we grow.

Christina, Alex, and Britt discuss the recent passing of Justice Ginsberg, the current environment of political polarization, and how the ideas of image vs. likeness can bring our practice and our ways of being into greater degrees of alignment.Become a supporter of the podcast by becoming a Patreon member!To check out Christina’s live stream and on-demand classes, workshops, and intensives, visit christinasellyoga.com.Find Britt’s Live Stream classes, library of offerings, Tarot readings, and other work here.To send questions, feedback, or get in touch about sponsorship inquiries, email us at hello@livethelightofyoga.com.Contributors: Christina Sell (co-host). Alex Lee-Ammons and Brittany Kassel (Producers, editors, and co-hosts). The LLOY podcast image was created by Danielle Alling of Kali Creative (www.kali-creative.com). Original music by Kelly Sell.

Rapp Report episode 139 Andrew speaks about politics and culture providing a Christian point of view. He addresses 1) Justice Ginsberg’s death, 2) the CA law requiring corporations to have one LGTB and one black on every board, 3) the debate between Trump and Biden, and 4) President Trump having COVID. This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community Support Striving for Eternity Give us your feedback, email us info@StrivingForEternity.org Get the book What Do They Believe Get the book What Do We Believe

Rapp Report episode 139 Andrew speaks about politics and culture providing a Christian point of view. He addresses 1) Justice Ginsberg's death, 2) the CA law requiring corporations to have one LGTB and one black on every board, 3) the debate between Trump and Biden, and 4) President Trump having COVID. This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community Support Striving for Eternity Give us your feedback, email us info@StrivingForEternity.org Get the book What Do They Believe Get the book What Do We Believe

Today's discussion is with Hayden Thorne.  He is a Kiwi, an aspiring academic, and a legal historian currently undertaking his PhD focused on the United States Supreme Court and the role that legal representation plays in the outcome of significant decisions. The Supreme Court, its decision making and traditions, the personalities on the Court and the critical role that the Court plays in the US is something that has fascinated me for many years. And I've been in search of someone to talk to about the Court for months now and just in the last week or so stumbled upon Hayden. Of course we talk about the impact of the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg - a liberal icon, and powerful voice for woman, minorities, and the disenfranchised.  We look at whether her jurisprudence changed during her tenure or just that the persona and profile grew.  And we briefly consider the importance of conventions and customs concerning the nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices and what might be lost when these are tossed aside because of the politics of either side. I was also really keen to talk about the recent series of decisions from the Supreme Court.  These included decisions on LGBTQ employment rights, abortion, and immigration and saw the Supreme Court's Chief Justice play a critical swing role siding with the Court's liberal justices to provide a majority.  We talk about these decisions, the composition of the Court, and what it is that Chief Justice Roberts, a conservative, is possibly motivated by.  As President Trump has nominated a replacement to Justice Ginsberg we recall the words of Justice Ginsberg herself saying that Presidents have often been disappointed with their nominations to the Court. Hayden provides a historic perspective and examples of where nominations to the Supreme Court haven't always panned out as expected. Links mentioned during the recording: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/ideasroom/a-potential-disaster-for-us-lawhttps://www.newsroom.co.nz/ideasroom/us-abortion-laws-intentionally-inflammatoryHost biography:Jordan Small: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordancsmall/jsmall@nzuscouncil.orgGuest biography: Hayden Thorne: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hayden-thorne-a1518a5a/For comments and feedback:Email: thefridaydownload@nzuscouncil.orgFacebook: facebook.com/nzuscouncilTwitter: twitter.com/nzuscouncilWebsite: nzuscouncil.orgCredits – opening and closing music:Happy Boy Theme Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This past June, many breathed a sigh of relief when the U.S. Supreme Court rose above partisanship in controversial cases involving abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, the rights of DREAMERS, and the president’s tax returns. In those cases, conservative justices relied on legal reasoning, rather than party loyalty, to guide their decisions. But lurking in the shadows is a concerning new trend in the Supreme Court to grant an unprecedented number of emergency orders with little transparency and no opportunity for recourse. These cases fall under the Court’s aptly named “shadow docket.” And under the Trump administration, this shadow docket has grown exponentially with the Supreme Court disproportionately ruling on the side of the administration. Here to tell us about this trend and why it’s so concerning is the ACLU’s legal director David Cole. We spoke with David before Justice Ginsberg's death and before President announced Amy Coney Barrett as his pick to replace Justice Ginsberg. It is safe to say that the trends we discussed with David are unlikely to shift course – and could even worsen in the wake of these events.

This month, America lost an icon. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg served on the Supreme Court for 27 years. There was a reason she earned the title “Notorious RBG.” She was a huge inspiration to Kaitlyn and Taylor and, while they are saddened by her passing, they are so honored to bring you an episode chronicling Justice Ginsberg's long list of accolades and “firsts.”

the discussion turns to the tragedy and what went wrong on both sides leading to the tragedy which has become known by a name. Brionna Taylor. Conversation turns to the ethical vs constitutional debate to fill the vacant supreme court seat left by the passing of Justice Ginsberg. Defund the Police advocate Alyssa Milano calls the police and infuriates the Sieve....

The controversy surrounding appointing the open seat on the Supreme Court left by the death of Justice Ginsberg. Email us your feedback: theywontwewill9@gmail.com --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/they-wont-we-will/support

John Yoo, the Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, gives his insights on Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. He discusses why her religious beliefs will be a target for attacks, the perception that she is the opposite of Justice Ginsberg, whether or not the window is too tight to get a confirmation before the election, and expanding the Supreme Court...

Another week in the United States of Serfs and Lords. Justice Ginsberg isn't even in the ground yet and the illegitimate, impeached, less-votes-getting #GOPdeathCult is happy to start dismantling her legacy - including destroying what little health protection Amercans have. Republicons ARE destroying democracy. It's time to break this country in two. We discuss the madness. _________________________________________ BECOME A "TARABUSTER" PATRON: www.patreon.com/taradevlin _________________________________________ Want to Connect In between shows? LEAVE TARA A MESSAGE: 360-777-6007 (your message may be played on the air) _________________________________________ Join the Tarabuster community on Discord too!! discord.gg/PRYDBx8 _________________________________________ DONATE TO PROGRESSIVE VOICES: www.progressivevoices.com/rdtdaily Buy some Resistance Merch and help support our progressive work! rdtdaily-merch.myshopify.com/

With the tragic passing of Justice Ginsberg the Supreme Court is thrust back into the forefront of American politics. Join Critical Conversations as we discuss the founding of the Supreme Court as well as what has lead us to such a significantly powerful court. Tired of the narrative-driven news of the day telling you what to think? Two friends sit down to discuss the hot topics of the day while maintaining a balanced approach. Learn and discover along with them as they seek to understand and investigate these important issues. Like and follow Critical Conversations on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CriticalConversationsShow Music: https://www.bensound.com/

John Yoo, the Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, gives his insights on Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. He discusses why her religious beliefs will be a target for attacks, the perception that she is the opposite of Justice Ginsberg, whether or not the window is too tight to get a confirmation before the election, and expanding the Supreme Court...

Yesterday, the day after a divided Washington came together to honor Justice Ginsberg, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court. A law clerk to and mentee of the late Justice Scalia, Barrett is described as an "originalist" and a "textualist" and the polar opposite of the liberal icon in judicial philosophy. Trump, who calls himself “president of law and order,” says the nomination was the fulfillment of one of his constitutional duties, but how does that square with his refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power? Public Strategies’ Howard Schweitzer, Mark Alderman, and Jerry Kilgore discuss a partisan and ideological battle Barrett’s nomination has ignited and its impact on the final days of the presidential campaign.

Yesterday, the day after a divided Washington came together to honor Justice Ginsberg, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court. A law clerk to and mentee of the late Justice Scalia, Barrett is described as an "originalist" and a "textualist" and the polar opposite of the liberal icon in judicial philosophy. Trump, who calls himself “president of law and order,” says the nomination was the fulfillment of one of his constitutional duties, but how does that square with his refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power? Public Strategies' Howard Schweitzer, Mark Alderman, and Jerry Kilgore discuss a partisan and ideological battle Barrett's nomination has ignited and its impact on the final days of the presidential campaign.

Another week in the United States of Serfs and Lords. Justice Ginsberg isn't even in the ground yet & the illegitimate, impeached, less-votes-getting #GOPdeathCult is happy to start dismantling her legacy - including destroying what little health protection Amercans have. Republicons ARE destroying democracy. It's time to break this country in two. We discuss the madness. _____________________________________________________________ Let’s help get ⁦⁦⁦Greg Palast's new book on the bestseller list - before it’s too late to stop #Twitler from stealing the 2020 election! Republicans can’t win without cheating and they’re not stopping without a fight! Order here: https://tinyurl.com/y9ss3ghr We discuss another week of madness _________________________________________ BECOME A "TARABUSTER" PATRON: www.patreon.com/taradevlin _________________________________________ Want to Connect In between shows? LEAVE TARA A MESSAGE: 360-777-6007 (your message may be played on the air) _________________________________________ Join the Tarabuster community on Discord too!! https://discord.gg/PRYDBx8 _________________________________________ DONATE TO PROGRESSIVE VOICES: www.progressivevoices.com/rdtdaily Buy some Resistance Merch and help support our progressive work! rdtdaily-merch.myshopify.com/ _________________________________________ Please support the Independent Liberal Media. Donate to RDTdaily.com and "Tarabuster." Every donation over $20 will receive a "Keep Calm and Join the Resistance" window cling featuring RDTdaily's mascot Francis Junior, Jr.! https://rdtdaily.com/donations/donate-to-rdtdaily-2/ _________________________________________ Tune in tonight 6PM EST a FACEBOOK and Youtube LIVE for another LIVE “Tarabuster!” Join RDTdaily.com’s Tara Devlin for our weekly therapy session for the Resistance! Rebroadcast on Progressive Voices Sunday 6PM EST, then ANYTIME on the Progressive Voices App. Spend your Saturday Evenings with Tara Devlin. Tweet @REALTaraDevlin or join the Chat LIVE at www.youtube.com/c/RDTdailyMedia

Not everything is terrible these days, just practically everything. This week Matthew and i discuss wrestling with few changes, forced hysterectomies, and the passing of Justice Ginsberg. if you enjoy the show, throw a few dollars our way over at patreon.com/redirect

MSNBC’S Ari Melber hosts “The Beat” on Friday, September 25, and reports on Trump’s official SCOTUS replacement for Justice Ginsberg, the fallout Barr and his DOJ face for pushing Trump’s voter fraud plot, and the latest in Breonna Taylor’s case. Melber also has a special interview with legendary journalist Bob Woodward on Trump and his latest book “Rage.” Former managing editor of Time Magazine Nancy Gibbs also joins.

President Trump continues to cast doubt on November's election. A second night of protests over the Breonna Taylor case. Capitol honor for Justice Ginsberg. CBS News Correspondent Peter King has today's World News Roundup.

MSNBC’s Ari Melber hosts “The Beat” on Thursday, September 24, and reports on the fallout Trump faces after refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, the states facing rising COVID infection rates and Justice Ginsberg being the first woman to ever lie in state at the U.S. capitol. Melber also follows up on the Breonna Taylor case. “The Art of the Deal” co-author Tony Schwartz and Beat regular Maya Wiley join.

Jeremiah Morrell and Dakota Davis are your hosts for the 176th edition of Boss Hog of Liberty. Chris Guffey makes it sound awesome on the producers desk. Rob Kendall and Zachary Burcham join today as guests. https://bosshog.fireside.fm/193 After a surprise week away the crew is back! Donald Rainwater is surging in the polls in the race for Governor. We detail the career of Eric Holcomb and why the environment has been so successful for the Rainwater Campaign. We officially look at this race as a toss up with just over a month to go. Washington has entered full crazy mode after the passing of Justice Ginsberg, and we talk through what “should” be getting done. Jeremiah reminds everyone that if the Republicans gave Merrick Garland a hearing and simply voted against him in 2016, everything would have been much smoother right now. Our program is community supported on Patreon. Do your part by chipping into the cause by donating monthly at any level at www.patreon.com/bosshogofliberty and receive even more BONUS coverage and content. Support The Boss Hog of Liberty Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Red Pill Chronicles, John Dennison discusses the calm before the storm that is coming against Trump’s SCOTUS nominee to replace Justice Ginsberg, and what the underlying […] The post Ep24. Abortion and the Ginsberg Follies appeared first on Dennison ROCKS.

MSNBC’s Ari Melber hosts “The Beat” on Wednesday, September 23, and reports on the grand jury’s findings in Breonna Taylor’s case and breaks down the decision to not charge any of the officers for her shooting death, despite the fact that the medical examiner ruled her death a homicide. Melber also updates viewers on COVID and honors the late Justice Ginsberg. Mark Cuban, Rep. Karen Bass and Brittney Cooper join.

The Book of Revelation tells us that in the end times, a delusion will be sent that will confound and confuse minds. This delusion will be sent after the Holy Spirit removes His hand of restraint. While we do not know the full impact or effect it will have, we do know that it will be an excruciatingly difficult time for any who remain on earth. We are seeing foreshadowing of this delusion in our world today in the vigil being held for Ruth Bader Ginsberg, a woman who was a pro-abortion, anti-family, hard left judge whose votes contributed to the slaughter of nearly 30,000,000 babies in the womb. Even such purported "evangelical" leaders are speaking of her "distinguished service" and...well, John will show you the quote that will simply make your blood boil. If people are so blind to the truth while the Holy Spirit is actively restraining men's actions, can you imagine what it will be like when the Spirit removes His restraint? I would imagine that many, like Justice Ginsberg, once their earthly lives are over, instantly regret their decisions in this life, as they plead and beg for just one more moment to get it right. Unfortunately, we all have a date certain when God will call us home, and at that point, our fates are sealed. Weep for Justice Ginsberg...justice will be served on behalf of the children whose cries were never heard. Pray our nation, and our world as we enter into very troublesome period of time leading up to the first week in November. We are living in unprecedented times that are even seeing a contagious peace break out through the Middle East. Time is short. Get your vertical relationship right, and hold on. It's gonna be a wild ride.FBC YouTube ChannelJohn's Video PresentationAmos37 WebsiteProphecy Updates

Tuesday Edition! President Trump considering at least four to five possible women nominees for the Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Ginsberg. Meanwhile, how far will Democrats go to stop the process? Joe Biden's teleprompter may become larger and larger liability as the candidate appears to rely on it for many interviews--even saying that he "lost the line" during one interview.  Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) says he will back a vote on a potential SCOTUS nominee from President Trump this year. If you like what we do on the the program, please consider sharing it to your social media! We depend on listeners like you and appreciate your support! Thank you! Thank you! www.kylewarrenshow.com

After 4 years in the ROTC, I thought I'd pretty much run the gambit on being dressed down in front of my colleagues. Then I had the honor of studying Tort Law under Professor Vincent R. Johnson at St. Mary's…The discussion – or rather, first-year law-vomit – Prof. Johnson entertained led me down the path to practicing the kind of civil litigation I do today. Our conversation begins with a reflection on the life of the Justice Ginsberg. As a Supreme Court Fellow (1988-89) serving Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Johnson has been fortunate enough to rub shoulders with those overseeing the highest court in the land. I promise the hiking story alone is worth the listen. Prof. Johnson & I also discuss the changing landscape of the American Legal Education system & the impact that online education has on fully engaging in the Socratic dialogues so vital to legal training. The prolific author of seven books & countless legal articles, my conversation with Prof. John was both nostalgic & prescient.I hope you enjoy the conversation.          SHOWNOTES:Find Prof. Johnson's full bio HEREFind Prof. Johnson on LinkedInRECENT ARTICLESThe Fiduciary Obligations of Public OfficialsThe Ancient Magna Carta & the Modern Rule of LawThe End of the Golden Age of American Legal Education (in Chinese - you'll need to use your browser's translator)________________________[ Legal Grounds is written, recorded & produced by Dust Devil Press ][ Our theme was composed by Dayna Vodovoz ]***You can contact us at: legalgrounds@thebassettfirm.com 

Political scientist Mark Caleb Smith looks are the likely judges the President will nominate for replacing Ruth Bader Ginsberg on the Supreme Court.  Kevin Palau of City Gospel Movements talks about the riots in Portland and the coordinated work of evangelical churches to offer healing and serve their community.

Political scientist Mark Caleb Smith looks are the likely judges the President will nominate for replacing Ruth Bader Ginsberg on the Supreme Court.  Kevin Palau of City Gospel Movements talks about the riots in Portland and the coordinated work of evangelical churches to offer healing and serve their community.

On Tuesday, Sen. Mitt Romney ended any hope that Democrats had they would be able to stop President Donald Trump from appointing a replacement for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg who died last week. S.V. Date, a senior White House correspondent for Huffington Post says he’s not surprised Romney decided to join with other Republicans in pushing to allow President Donald Trump to appoint a replacement for Justice Ginsberg.“Everybody is wondering how Mitt Romney could do this. This is something Republicans have wanted for years. This is the quid pro quo they made when they decided to support Donald Trump in 2016,” he says. Date is also the author of the book “Useful Idiot: How Donald Trump Killed the Republican Party with Racism and the Rest of Us with Coronavirus.” He was a guest on the Utah Politics podcast and believes the rush to confirm a Supreme Court nominee could energize Democrats ahead of November. “Democrats haven’t taken the Supreme Court that seriously as an election issue. Maybe having this happen so close to the election reminds them that elections have consequences,” said Date. Date leaped into the public eye in August when he asked Trump during a White House press conference if he “regretted all of the lying” he’s done during his time in office. S.V. Date on Twitter: @svdateSubscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Saint Louis is making national headlines for its historic level of homicides.  Ryan gives his thoughts on how sad this is.  Brad Young sat down with Ryan to discuss the passing of Justice Ginsberg and how soon her replacement should be confirmed.  Missouri updates on Coronavirus numbers via Dr. Garza; Ryan says the news is good and stabilization is happening.  Missouri Governor Parson signed into law allowing Saint Louis Public Safety personnel (Police, Fire, EMT) to work in the city without having to live in the city. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Paul and Kate talk about the American Empires. We recorded this before the passing of Justice Ginsberg. Rest in Peace. We’ll have a new episode soon.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg died last week and our timelines lit up with people mourning her death and some people exulting in it. Politics are often polarizing, but grief is often communal with people experiencing different amounts and aspects of it, but shared grief can be such a powerful thing. Kindness matters. Even to the dead. Action and beliefs matter. Especially to the still living. No matter what you think of her court decisions, which were meant to heal the ‘fractures in federal law,’ Ginsberg has some very good advice about marriage and words, which is why we’re talking about her now. Back in 2016, Justice Ginsberg wrote about her mother-in-law’s life advice. Ginsberg“’In every good marriage,’ she counseled, ‘it helps sometimes to be a little deaf.’ I have followed that advice assiduously, and not only at home through 56 years of a marital partnership nonpareil. I have employed it as well in every workplace, including the Supreme Court. When a thoughtless or unkind word is spoken, best tune out. Reacting in anger or annoyance will not advance one’s ability to persuade.” Ginsberg talked about how both her mother’s push for her to be independent and her professor’s focus on language influenced her, propelling her to rise in the ranks to become a Supreme Court justice. Ginsberg“At Cornell University, my professor of European literature, Vladimir Nabokov, changed the way I read and the way I write. Words could paint pictures, I learned from him. Choosing the right word, and the right word order, he illustrated, could make an enormous difference in conveying an image or an idea.” Words influence thought influence action. Putting them in the right order? It makes all the difference. She also spoke about the dynamics on the court where nine justices sit, saying, Ginsberg excerpted in the NYT“Despite our strong disagreements on cardinal issues — think, for example, of controls on political campaign spending, affirmative action, access to abortion — we genuinely respect one another, even enjoy one another’s company. “Collegiality is crucial to the success of our mission. We could not do the job the Constitution assigns to us if we didn’t — to use one of Justice Antonin Scalia’s favorite expressions — ‘get over it!’” That might be the best marriage advice of all. WRITING TIP FOR LIFE Your word choice and word order matter. Be selective. DOG TIP FOR LIFE Getting over it allows you to feel better and make your relationships stronger. Dwelling is never a good move. And selective hearing? Giving yourself time to react so that you don't act rashly? Always a wise choice. SHOUT OUT The music we’ve clipped and shortened in this podcast is awesome and is made available through the Creative Commons License. Here’s a link to that and the artist’s website. Who is this artist and what is this song? It’s “Summer Spliff” by Broke For Free. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/carriejonesbooks/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/carriejonesbooks/support

In this BONUS episode, Mary speaks for herself and Lee, who is unable to appear on this episode. Mary pays homage to the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg who recently died of pancreatic cancer. Celebrating the life of this iconic legal trailblazer who dedicated her career to challenging the patriarchal world and fought against gender discrimination in all forms. A few hours after Justice Ginsberg's death Mitch McConnell publicly announced that he will ignore Justice Ginsberg's dying wish, which was for her seat to not be filled until the next President is installed.  You will hear Trump, the very next day at a rally in Fayetteville, N.C. vow to fill her Supreme Court seat quickly. This is GOP hypocrisy laid bare after they refused to fill Justice Scalia's seat 11 months before the 2016 election claiming the voters needed a say in who was nominated. The GOP is aware of the stakes and they have never been higher. The GOP donors are so close to a complete power grab. True to form, Trump says the quiet part out loud when he admits that he is counting on the captured federal courts to hand him the election by limiting what ballots actually count. The fear for democracy is real and the fight is very much on. May Ruth Bader Ginsberg's life inspire a revolution. Resources cited in this episode:https://www.c-span.org/video/?475837-1/president-trump-announce-nominee-supreme-court-next-weekhttps://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-iba-syn&hsimp=yhs-syn&hspart=iba&p=Lindsey+Graham+use+my+words+video#id=2&vid=f034f8b39d4e9e9810e3600f2e31c2b9&action=click

One key Republican senator says they already have enough votes to confirm Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's replacement before the election, even without knowing who President Trump will nominate. Democrats say they're not giving up the fight over the Supreme Court appointment, even though only two Republican senators have said that the vote should wait. Ginsburg will be honored on Friday as the first woman ever to lie in state at the U.S. Capitol. We expect to see thousands of people outside the Supreme Court as they memorialize her, and then members of the public can come to pay their own respects. Thousands of flags cover the National Mall in Washington, honoring the nearly 200,000 Americans killed by the coronavirus. This stands in stark contrast with President Trump's comment last night, saying the virus affects "virtually nobody."

Get ready for a whirlwind primer in the GOP donor-funded Trump-McConnell takeover of the U.S. judiciary. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has essentially shut down the Legislative Branch for anything except confirming Trump judges. They know they’re not going to finish in Trump’s first term. If he gets a second term, they WILL finish. Already, the Trump-McConnell controlled courts have a unanimous victory on the 80 corporate cases that have appeared in front of the Supreme Court. That is 80, 5-4 decisions, in favor of corporate interests and that is EVERY case decided in favor of private interests and against the public good. Their priority is to pack the courts with judges who are young, inexperienced, and pro-corporate. McConnell and the Senate Republicans have turned the Senate and the Legislative Branch into  a conveyor belt for confirming Trump judges. The House Democrats have passed over 350 bills, 90% of which have bi-partisan support, that have yet to even be considered by the Senate.The courts are all but captured and with Justice Ginsberg’s seat now vacant, the stakes for America have never been higher. Click here to view the episode on our websiteClick here to view the episode transcriptLinks to research used in this episode:The Myth of 'Captured Courts' | OpinionPresident Trump's re-election rally in TulsaAn inside look at how Trump's Supreme Court list is made: ‘A tremendous investment of time’DPCC Report: Stabenow, Schumer, Whitehouse Unveil Report Detailing GOP's Big-Money Assault on the Constitution, Our Independent Judiciary, and the Rule of LawMitch Part 4: 'Not A Happy Choice' : Embeddedhttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/07/he-defended-anti-gay-and-anti-muslim-causes-now-hes-an-immigration-judge/ Frequently Asked Questions, fedsoc.orgTrump’s New Judicial Litmus Test: Shrinking ‘the Administrative State’Economic Inequality and Political Representation

Infectious disease expert Zach Jenkins looks at how an common anti-inflammatory drug may reduce the recovery time for COVID-19 and how vaccine trials are progressing.  Political scientist Adam Carrington talks about the death of Justice Ginsberg and how it's affecting the election cycle.

Infectious disease expert Zach Jenkins looks at how an common anti-inflammatory drug may reduce the recovery time for COVID-19 and how vaccine trials are progressing.  Political scientist Adam Carrington talks about the death of Justice Ginsberg and how it's affecting the election cycle.

Introduction, what to do, quote of the day, prayer of the day, don't debate, justice ginsberg, conclusion

Rob McKenna on the legacy of Justice Ginsberg, and the two frontrunners for her seat // Paging Dr Cohen -- flu shots and facemasks // Hanna Scott with head of the Seattle's OPA, investigating 5 officers for allegations of protest-related misconduct // Dose of Kindness -- an odd chair brings strangers together // Gee Scott on attending an NFL game without fans in the stands // Jill Schlesinger on the mounting national debt // Charity of the Month -- Code 4 NW See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Justice Ginsberg that person who disrespect Colin Kapernick and others protesting police terrorism dies. Thank God!

As Americans are remembering the life of Justice Ginsberg, Republicans and Democrats in Congress are fighting over who will replace her, and when. President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have vowed to move fast, using their power to replace her. Democrats say voters should decide who chooses the new justice. White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany joins us live to discuss that President Trump will pick a third Supreme Court justice. People are leaving flowers and other tributes to Justice Ginsburg outside the Supreme Court. One more tropical storm is set to make landfall in the U.S., this time in Texas.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is being called a hypocrite for rushing to confirm a Supreme Court nomination to fill Justice Ginsberg's seat when he waited 10 months to fill a seat in 2016 when President Obama was in office. Is it McConnell who is a hypocrite or Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Chick Schumer who all argued for a quick confirmation in 2016? Also does hypocrisy really count when we are facing a constitutional crisis if no clear winner emerges from the General Election in November and the Supreme Court decides who the next president will be?

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg has shed her mortal coil leaving an immense vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court. Within 15 minutes of her death, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was tweeting we need to wait until after the election to fill her seat. Neither President Trump nor Majority Leader Mitch McConnell appear to be hesitating in getting the nomination and confirmation process rolling. Should they wait?

The Voice of One podcast (VOO!) is hosted by Woody Cumbie. In this episode, Woody discusses the passing of Justice Ginsberg, the Democrat's plan for post-election day, Florida State at Miami and the best dessert kitchen in Indiana.

In today's episode, we go over the tragic loss of Justice Ginsberg and the implications of her passing. Additionally, we go over a senate bill that featured anti-Semitic language. Topics for today was the esoteric religious movement Raelism, as well as talk about other religious ideologies. Thank you for listening, and check out our social media pages!

This week we pummel through another week of tough news including the passing away of Justice Ginsberg, the battle for the courts, & more ICE revelations Plus! Skip or stay on Trump diversions & Ty Lawson! Follow us @pagandapod on social media Kirzia Steele: @kirziasteele Ryan O'Toole: @ryanohtrue

Hey Party Crashers - Like you, we here at the Uninvited are mourning the loss and celebrating the life of Ruth Bader Ginsberg - the conscience of the Supreme Court and the defender of freedom and justice for all in America. Today's episode is all about the Notorious RBG and taking up the fight she so successfully fought for her entire legal career. Since it is difficult to put into words what we're feeling right now, we aren't gonna to type any more words except to quote the great Alice Walker as we go thru this really tough -- and let's call it what it is...a rather shitty -- time. Ms. Walker says: "The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any." Just because it is dark now, we must summon the will to fight and exercise our power...and we must do it together. This is what Justice Ginsberg did her entire life and career and this is what we must do now. We love you and we've got your back. Let's do this! - Jerry --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jerry-jones5/message

Democrats have woken up to what the "peaceful protests" are doing to their poll numbers. Now with Justice Ginsberg's passing, it is going to get really ugly. Will a replacement nomination be forthcoming? --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

The amazing life of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg and the debate that will take place now that her seat is vacant --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jennifer-a-sayles/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jennifer-a-sayles/support

Kris brings on two guests for today's show to talk about the recent passing of Justice Ginsberg and the cost of "not getting along in the sandbox".

Also happening today ... Mayor Lori Lightfoot is not happy that the head of Chicago's the Police Union walked out of contract talks with the City this week  Debt tied to COVID-19 could delay a massive project at a Chicago airport... The FBI is on the trail of someone they call a serial bank robber in Chicago and the burbs.      See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Unreasonable use of force The Supreme Court has decided to limit damage suits against government officials in Hernandez vs. Mesa. However, the court’s more liberal justices dissented from the ruling. On the border between the United States and Mexico, controlled by the United States, U.S. Border Patrol agent Jesus Mesa fatally shot Sergio Hernández, a 15-year-old Mexican boy, seemingly without justification or provocation. At the time of the shooting, Mesa was in U.S. territory, while Hernández was on Mexican soil. Hernández’s family sued Agent Mesa for damages, arguing that his arbitrary use of deadly force violated the Fourth Amendment. Under the US Constitution, courts perform an essential checking function on the political branches of government, ensuring compliance with the Constitution’s protection of individual rights. In another case: Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, allows individuals to seek monetary compensation from federal officials who have violated their constitutional rights. Agent Mesa countered that the Fourth Amendment does not apply because Hernández was standing in Mexican territory at the time of the shooting. In a divided decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the Hernández family could not assert a claim under the Fourth Amendment because Hernández was a Mexican citizen who was on Mexican territory at the time of the shooting. Hernández’s family then petitioned the Supreme Court to review this decision. Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans attended today’s argument and issued the following reaction: “In an Oval Office meeting back in March, President Trump reportedly suggested that U.S. Border Patrol agents “shoot migrants in the legs to slow them down.” During today’s oral argument, Trump’s Department of Justice argued that persons killed or harmed by Border Patrol agents, even within the United States, should have no right to go to court to remedy the acts of such rogue border guards. In their view, the courthouse doors must be firmly closed against any efforts to hold Border Patrol agents accountable to the Constitution. The Supreme Court shouldn’t sanction a Constitution-free zone at the border that would allow U.S. Border Patrol agents to shoot to kill without any possibility of redress. It seems that Hernandez vs. Mesa showsf the court’s determination to limit damage suits against government officials. Congressman Joaquin Castro Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court 5-4 decision on Hernandez vs. Mesa: “Sergio was an unarmed child when he was gunned down across the border by US Border Patrol Agent Mesa. Because of today’s decision, the Hernandez family now has no path to seek justice for his murder. This ruling means that moving forward, no one, not even unarmed children or their families, have the right to sue a federal agent for a cross-border shooting. This decision comes at a time when thousands of asylum seekers are being forced to live in camps along the border because of the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy. If children like Sergio - who was just playing along the border - can be murdered without recourse then CBP agents know that they will not be held accountable for similar crimes. He went on to say: “Justice Ginsberg rightly noted that this was not an isolated incident. It’s become abundantly clear that Trump’s Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection are out of control and must be reined in. Congress must hold this department accountable and ensure that agents who abuse their power face justice.” The case began in 2010 when 15-year-old Sergio Adrian Hernandez was playing a dangerous game with several friends in the dry culvert separating El Paso from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The boys ran up the embankment on the U.S. side,

Unreasonable use of force The Supreme Court has decided to limit damage suits against government officials in Hernandez vs. Mesa. However, the court’s more liberal justices dissented from the ruling. On the border between the United States and Mexico, controlled by the United States, U.S. Border Patrol agent Jesus Mesa fatally shot Sergio Hernández, a 15-year-old Mexican boy, seemingly without justification or provocation. At the time of the shooting, Mesa was in U.S. territory, while Hernández was on Mexican soil. Hernández’s family sued Agent Mesa for damages, arguing that his arbitrary use of deadly force violated the Fourth Amendment. Under the US Constitution, courts perform an essential checking function on the political branches of government, ensuring compliance with the Constitution’s protection of individual rights. In another case: Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, allows individuals to seek monetary compensation from federal officials who have violated their constitutional rights. Agent Mesa countered that the Fourth Amendment does not apply because Hernández was standing in Mexican territory at the time of the shooting. In a divided decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the Hernández family could not assert a claim under the Fourth Amendment because Hernández was a Mexican citizen who was on Mexican territory at the time of the shooting. Hernández’s family then petitioned the Supreme Court to review this decision. Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans attended today’s argument and issued the following reaction: “In an Oval Office meeting back in March, President Trump reportedly suggested that U.S. Border Patrol agents “shoot migrants in the legs to slow them down.” During today’s oral argument, Trump’s Department of Justice argued that persons killed or harmed by Border Patrol agents, even within the United States, should have no right to go to court to remedy the acts of such rogue border guards. In their view, the courthouse doors must be firmly closed against any efforts to hold Border Patrol agents accountable to the Constitution. The Supreme Court shouldn’t sanction a Constitution-free zone at the border that would allow U.S. Border Patrol agents to shoot to kill without any possibility of redress. It seems that Hernandez vs. Mesa showsf the court’s determination to limit damage suits against government officials. Congressman Joaquin Castro Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court 5-4 decision on Hernandez vs. Mesa: “Sergio was an unarmed child when he was gunned down across the border by US Border Patrol Agent Mesa. Because of today’s decision, the Hernandez family now has no path to seek justice for his murder. This ruling means that moving forward, no one, not even unarmed children or their families, have the right to sue a federal agent for a cross-border shooting. This decision comes at a time when thousands of asylum seekers are being forced to live in camps along the border because of the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy. If children like Sergio - who was just playing along the border - can be murdered without recourse then CBP agents know that they will not be held accountable for similar crimes. He went on to say: “Justice Ginsberg rightly noted that this was not an isolated incident. It’s become abundantly clear that Trump’s Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection are out of control and must be reined in. Congress must hold this department accountable and ensure that agents who abuse their power face justice.” The case began in 2010 when 15-year-old Sergio Adrian Hernandez was playing a dangerous game with several friends in the dry culvert separating El Paso from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The boys ran up the embankment on the U.S. side,

News on the Australian wildfire disaster, Justice Ginsberg, another meat-free option, and so much more. Plus reviews of Adventure Force 5 and Deathstroke Knights and Dragons... --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/chris-h79/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/chris-h79/support

Todays JN Reign and Michelle talk about what rules we follow when dealing with social media. relations, friends and business. Social Media Links to social media: Facebook: www.facebook.com/jnreign1Twitter Catch my logic : www.twitter.com/catchmylogicTwitter for JNReign: www.twitter.com/JNReignInstagram : www.instagram.com/catchmylogicHashtag: #mylogic #reign Send your logic, questions on my logic, suggestions for shows, and letters to be read on air to Catchmylogic@gmail.com Website_ www.catchmylogic.com Show Chapters2:06 Sea World the weird mix between amazement and terror 5:58 Pushing politics 7:00 Steve Bullock website review -https://stevebullock.com/meet-steve/ - https://ballotpedia.org/Steve_Bullock_presidential_campaign,_2020 14:40 Pete Buttgieg h https://ballotpedia.org/Pete_Buttigieg_presidential_campaign,_20e https://peteforamerica.com 20:00 Julian Castro- https://www.julianforthefuture.comhttps://ballotpedia.org/Julián_Castro 30:20 Trends- Amazon Rain Forest Fire, Missy Elliott’s New Album ,Justice Ginsberg’s health and our concerns, She Ready Comedy Show 39:50- Show topic Social Media and relationships. How to help the Amazon https://www.worldwildlife.orghttps://www.buzzfeed.com/sydrobinson1/heres-how-you-can-help-amazon-rainforest-fires Support the show (http://www.catchmylogic.com)

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Alito, decided The Dutra Group v. Batterton, which answered the question, can a Jones Act seaman recover punitive damages on his or her unseaworthiness claim? The plaintiff, a Jones Act seaman employed by Dutra Group, was injured on the defendant’s dredge vessel on the West Coast. A hatch blew open and crushed his hand. The district court denied the defendant’s motion to strike the punitive damages claim; the Ninth Circuit affirmed. This decision set up a split in the circuits, because a couple of years earlier the en banc Fifth Circuit held that punitive damages were not available under the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court case, Miles v. Apex Marine.The Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-3, reversed the Ninth Circuit and held that punitive damages are not available in an unseaworthiness cause of action. Don Haycraft will analyze the opinion and the dissent, written by Justice Ginsberg.Featuring: Don Haycraft, Of Counsel, Liskow & Lewis Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Alito, decided The Dutra Group v. Batterton, which answered the question, can a Jones Act seaman recover punitive damages on his or her unseaworthiness claim? The plaintiff, a Jones Act seaman employed by Dutra Group, was injured on the defendant’s dredge vessel on the West Coast. A hatch blew open and crushed his hand. The district court denied the defendant’s motion to strike the punitive damages claim; the Ninth Circuit affirmed. This decision set up a split in the circuits, because a couple of years earlier the en banc Fifth Circuit held that punitive damages were not available under the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court case, Miles v. Apex Marine.The Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-3, reversed the Ninth Circuit and held that punitive damages are not available in an unseaworthiness cause of action. Don Haycraft will analyze the opinion and the dissent, written by Justice Ginsberg.Featuring: Don Haycraft, Of Counsel, Liskow & Lewis Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Hr 1: Mueller's "final word" wasn't final after all. DOJ and Special Counsel released joint statement to clarify. AND... Retired USMC Colonel Corey Duncan says, men, put down the video games and stop letting Liberal women raise your children. Be a man! Hr 2: Smollett may be in a world of HURT! AND... Evan Sayet talks about his new book "Apocali NOW!" Adult political satire and children's book all in one! It's a book to ridicule the Left and enlighten anyone who picks it up. Hr 3: Disney vows to not shoot in woman-hating states who outlaw aborting babies with a heartbeat. Aren't they supposed to be a kid-friendly network?!? AND... Justice Ginsberg says pregnant women are not mothers. Have you had your healthy dose of reality lately?

Chris Cillizza interviews Allan Lichtman, who predicted Trump would win 2016 election. Lichtman says Democrats need to turn 3 more key factors against Trump before the Election, or Trump will win. May have to impeach? Scandal isn't a factor Lichtman counts against Trump - which has to make Cillizza's head spin. Video of Joe Biden talking with Chris Matthews resurfaces. Wants to require English for immigrants? Uses term "illegal aliens." Will this impact his ability to win Democrat Primary? Supreme Court upholds part of Indiana law requiring aborted babies to be buried or cremated. Verbal scuffle between Justice Thomas and Justice Ginsberg. Undue burden? Mother? 

Chris Cillizza interviews Allan Lichtman, who predicted Trump would win 2016 election. Lichtman says Democrats need to turn 3 more key factors against Trump before the Election, or Trump will win. May have to impeach? Scandal isn't a factor Lichtman counts against Trump - which has to make Cillizza's head spin. Video of Joe Biden talking with Chris Matthews resurfaces. Wants to require English for immigrants? Uses term "illegal aliens." Will this impact his ability to win Democrat Primary? Supreme Court upholds part of Indiana law requiring aborted babies to be buried or cremated. Verbal scuffle between Justice Thomas and Justice Ginsberg. Undue burden? Mother? 

Chris Cillizza interviews Allan Lichtman, who predicted Trump would win 2016 election. Lichtman says Democrats need to turn 3 more key factors against Trump before the Election, or Trump will win. May have to impeach? Scandal isn't a factor Lichtman counts against Trump - which has to make Cillizza's head spin. Video of Joe Biden talking with Chris Matthews resurfaces. Wants to require English for immigrants? Uses term "illegal aliens." Will this impact his ability to win Democrat Primary? Supreme Court upholds part of Indiana law requiring aborted babies to be buried or cremated. Verbal scuffle between Justice Thomas and Justice Ginsberg. Undue burden? Mother? 

Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter, Greg Stohr, discusses Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s return to the bench for the first time in two months, and the Supreme Court’s decision to take up the politically divisive clash over whether the Trump administration can ask about citizenship on the 2020 census. He speaks to Bloomberg’s June Grasso.

Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter, Greg Stohr, discusses Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's return to the bench for the first time in two months, and the Supreme Court's decision to take up the politically divisive clash over whether the Trump administration can ask about citizenship on the 2020 census. He speaks to Bloomberg's June Grasso. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Amanda and Sam return for season 4! Amanda offers her internal organs to Justice Ginsberg, Sam brings some bizarre wine, and producer Zack spends the episode on a tiny toilet.

It's no secret that Justice Ginsberg has had her share of medical challenges. And having been witness to many people who've suffered similar fates, we're extremely sympathetic to what she's going through. But she has no business still being on the High Court. She's been fading for many years and has become a mythical figure. How much longer can she continue on down this path? Probably not much, which is why she should be allowed to enjoy a quiet retirement and not expected to be the torch carrier against a republican dominated court. More on gold prices, www.JasonHarman.com. What about the government shutdown and do we need a TSA? And what is a non-essential government worker? Surely one we can do without. And the dirty secret is that once the government reopens, they'll get all their back pay, even if they were furloughed. 

It's no secret that Justice Ginsberg has had her share of medical challenges. And having been witness to many people who've suffered similar fates, we're extremely sympathetic to what she's going through. But she has no business still being on the High Court. She's been fading for many years and has become a mythical figure. How much longer can she continue on down this path? Probably not much, which is why she should be allowed to enjoy a quiet retirement and not expected to be the torch carrier against a republican dominated court. More on gold prices, www.JasonHarman.com. What about the government shutdown and do we need a TSA? And what is a non-essential government worker? Surely one we can do without. And the dirty secret is that once the government reopens, they'll get all their back pay, even if they were furloughed. 

Betsy West is an award-winning filmmaker, journalist and educator and the co-Director & co-Producer of the film RGB about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.  A producer and executive for over two decades at ABC News, West received 21 Emmy Awards and two DuPont-Columbia Awards for her work on “Nightline” and “Prime Time Live” read more>>> The post 20: [K-Cup minisode] RBG: How ‘RBG’ Director Betsy West Convinced Justice Ginsberg to Do the Interview appeared first on Time4Coffee.

Hr 1: Mueller's team thinks Manafort's lifestyle makes him guilty. Having money is NOT a crime. AND... Netflix thinks Farrakhan's biography may be too hateful to air. Hr 2: Would you donate an organ to keep Justice Ginsberg alive? AND... Dr. Gerard Lameiro discusses chances of a govt shutdown. Trump threatening a shutdown is firing up his base. He's tired of Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell dragging their feet against the will of the people. Hr 3: Colleges across the Southeast U.S. have conference on fighting whiteness. You tax money at work! AND... Portland Mayor demands police stand down outside ICE building. Have you had your healthy dose of reality lately?  More at the Web Site ... www.TheRealSide.com Wanna Partner / Support the Show? https://www.patreon.com/TheRealSide Tweet me @JoeMessina / @TheRealSide Apple App ...  https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/real-side-with-joe-messina/id1242114000?mt=8  Android app ... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=starksocial.therealside  Joe takes the issues… especially the controversial issues (politics, prejudice, religion, illegal immigration)… and brings in people from different sides to share their viewpoint. This is definitely  not a fluff piece. And while no one is attacked, the questions are hard-hitting. But the conversation is always respectful and you're sure to learn something new, even if you  don't agree! If you've always wondered how the “other side” thinks and how they've arrived at their “stand”,  then this is the show for you! It's not the right side, it's not the wrong side, but the REAL side of the issues!

Our guest this week is Bryant Johnson, author of The RBG Workout. RBG, as in Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg! Bryant is the Supreme Court Justice’s personal trainer, and his book outlines the workout that he designed and guides her through twice a week. Bryant tells Amy and Dr. B all about his day job as a paratrooper in the Army Reserve and how he ended up as Justice Ginsberg’s personal trainer. He describes how he designed a customized workout for Justice Ginsburg to rebuild her strength after her bout with cancer, and how he uses this experience to help other recovering cancer patients. Bryant also shares some details on the origins of “Super Diva”, “Body Justice”, and why he often describes Justice Ginsburg as a cyborg. You can find The RBG Workout on rbgworkout.com, amazon.com, and wherever books are sold.

If you need some inspiration in your life you have GOT TO go out this weekend and support the opening of the documentary RBG which is about the honorable Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg (duh.) We had the pleasure of speaking with the directors Betsy West and Julie Cohen a couple of weeks back about their incredible film and incredible access to Justice Ginsberg, her family, and her notable friends and colleagues. Ruth Bader Ginsberg is a national treasure and we hope that you not only appreciate her gumption and fight but that her story is one of hard work and determination. GO SUPPORT WOMEN FILMMAKERS!   Visit our website! www.bitchtalkpodcast.com Follow us on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter.........  

Guest:   Bill Katz, the editor of Urgent Agenda..........we will look at President Trump vs the media, a weekly story..................the Democrats have a new DNC Chairman but will it really matter.......Justice Ginsberg's statements about the state of the country.........should a Supreme Court Justice give opinions in public?   the debate about immigration is about Illegal immigration.........North Korea and China.......VP Pence in Europe talking NATO.............1993 and the first attack against the World Trade Center..............and more stories..........     FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER........................and check out my BLOG............      

We will look at today's top stories.........Justice Ginsberg's statements about the state of the country.........should a Supreme Court Justice give opinions in public?   the debate about immigration is about Illegal immigration.....George Harrison was born in 1943.....and we remember the terrible tragedy of Brothers to the rescue 21 years ago...........and more stories..........     FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER........................and check out my BLOG............      

In the last episode we discussed understanding failure. Reaching muscle failure in your workout to be more precise and by hitting muscle failure safely, you get a weeks' worth of exercise in just one 20-minute session. In this episode Adam Zickerman provides a very descriptive and detailed definition of a high-intensity workout from Ken Hutchins, one of the pioneers of this slow motion, high-intensity strength training system.  __________ If you'd like to ask Adam, Mike or Sheila a question or have a comment regarding the Power of 10. Send us an email or record a voice memo on your phone and send it to podcast@informfitness.com.  Join Inform Nation and call the show with a comment or question.  The number is 888-983-5020, Ext. 3.  To purchase Adam's book, Power of 10: The Once-a-Week Slow Motion Fitness Revolution click this link to visit Amazon:  https://www.amazon.com/Power-Once-Week-Revolution-Harperresource/dp/006000889X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1485469022&sr=1-1&keywords=the+power+of+10+book Ilf you would like to produce a podcast of your own just like The Inform Fitness Podcast, please email Tim Edwards at tim@InBoundPodcasting.com The transcription to this episode is below: 05 Who is Ken Hutchins - Transcript Intro: You're listening to the InForm Fitness podcast, 20 minutes with New York Times, best-selling author, Adam Zickerman and friends. Brought to you by InForm Fitness, life-changing personal training with several locations across the US. Reboot your metabolism and experience the revolutionary Power of 10, the high intensity, slow motion, strength training system that's so effective, you'd get a week's worth of exercise in just one 20-minute session, which by no coincidence is about the length of this podcast. So, get ready InForm Nation, your 20 minutes of high-intensity strength training information begins in 3, 2, 1. Thanks for joining us for the InForm Fitness podcast, 20 minutes with Adam Zickerman and friends. I'm Tim Edwards, the founder of the Inbound Podcasting Network. Back with Adam's friends and colleagues. Sheila Melody from the InForm Fitness Toluca Lake location and Mike Rogers from the New York City location. And across the hall from Mike is the founder of InForm Fitness and author of the New York Times, best-seller, Power of 10: The Once-a-Week Slow Motion Fitness Revolution, Adam Zickerman. We are in the middle of a series of high intensity during your workout. In the last episode,  we discussed understanding failure. Reaching muscle failure in your workout to be more precise and by hitting muscle failure safely, you get a weeks' worth of exercise in just one 20-minute session. Now, coming up in this episode we'll provide a very descriptive and detailed definition of a high-intensity workout from Ken Hutchins, one of the pioneers of this protocol. We'll also discuss how this type of workout will enhance your performance and whatever activity it is you enjoy but first, Adam, let's dispel the stigma associated with the word intensity. I mean, we don't want to scare anybody. Intensity, yeah, an intense workout, I think will scare most people if they feel like they're out of shape or they haven't worked out in a long time and yeah, that raises concern for sure, raises the red flag so to speak in peoples' minds when they hear that this is not only an intense workout but a very intense workout and one of the first things that pops into a lot of peoples' heads is, "Can I do this?" Or, "Is it safe for me?” And that's what I meant when I said it depends who's telling the story about intensity. I think what we do so well is explaining that intensity is not the problem but it's the way we try to achieve intensity that's really where the problems lie. When I talk to clients and when I say high intensity and when I personally think of high intensity I think of that -- the first thing that comes to my mind is that Insanity Workout. High intensity! You know, it's like -- and I always try to tell people, you know, “You're not going to be jumping around. You're not going to be like you know, we're not going to kill you.” So, you have to kind of -- yeah, you do have to kind of qualify it a little bit, you know, when you say, high intensity.     Yeah. It's interesting because a lot of the medical research and fitness research that's been coming out over the last few years which we've been advocating for, you know, I don't know. Adam, how long now? Almost 20 years. Is -- My whole life. Exactly, you know, but it's a -- Yeah, sure. [laughs] Everyone's now a big advocate and they've showed through a lot more of the studies that a high intensity stimulus is the more worthwhile stimulus in order to gain the adaptation and the effect over the muscle in the body. So, it's a, as Adam said, it is the modality. It's defining it. I mean, some of the things that have taken the headlines are the 7-minute workout in the New York Times, CrossFit boot camps. You know, all engaging, fun, highly intense and where people have gotten, like, a lot of results but often times they're not assessing the risk when entering into those types of workouts and I think that's where Power of 10 and InForm Fitness is really, really -- that's where we have the advantage. And when we're talking intensity too and for 20 minutes, we really want to make it clear to somebody who's considering this type of exercise that it is not 20 solid minutes of intensity. Really. I mean, based upon, you know, the five to seven or however many exercises somebody's going thorough within that 20 minutes, the intensity really is in the last 30 seconds of the exercise. At least that's how I feel. Well, Tim, you make a good point actually. Your question is right on because you're not doing 20 minutes of high-intensity exercise. If you're doing six exercises that last a total of a minute and a half, that's nine minutes actually of exercise. Mhm [affirmative]. Alright. So, one and a half minutes, times six is nine minutes. You know, when it comes down to it, whether it's a two-minute set or even a three-minute set or a one-minute set, at the end you've reached muscle failure. At the end it's still those last 20 seconds. Now, there are a lot of people that if you pick a weight where those last 20 seconds come in 60 seconds. Alright, so come on -- that means it's already starting hard and challenging but it's not like grueling. Now, I understand that some people, especially beginners need to kind of work up to that burn but, you know, what I found is once you understand what the bottom line is and where you have to go, a lot of people want to get it over with. People want the weight to be heavier so they don't have to take two minutes to get to that point. And as long as their form is solid it's going to be okay. When on the first couple sessions it's usually not about deep muscle failure. It's just about understanding intensity anyway. So, it's something that you know, we're focusing more on the form and making sure people feel confident and safe while they accept and understand what it feels like to do to have an intense stimulus on their body. Usually, it's unlike anything they've had before. Even with very, very competitive athletes. It's quite a challenge. Right and it certainly takes some getting used to but it really doesn't take long. So, Adam, let's shift gears a little bit here. In your book, Power of 10: The Once-a- Week Slow Motion Revolution, and in earlier episodes of the podcast, you've mentioned the name, Ken Hutchins, one of the pioneers of the super slow technique. Tell us a little bit more about Ken and share with us his definition of a high-intensity exercise regime. We'd be doing everyone a disservice to not mention where this all came from. This was not my brain child, this idea of exercise versus recreation. I wish it was but it's not. Regardless, I'm following it but the person who's responsible for this is a guy named Ken Hutchins and he worked for Nautilus. He was a protégé of Arthur Jones who was the founder of Nautilus and Nautilus had their own protocol. They weren't just an exercise company. They were a protocol, an exercise protocol. A lot of the early body builders were using it back when he came out with this thing in the mid to late 60s, the Nautilus equipment. The protocol was high intensity -- this is the beginning of high-intensity exercise where finally intensity, almost above all else was the key to seeing results and it was done in a -- he called it a two, four protocol which is lifting in two and lowering in four. So, that was drastically slower than what was -- that used to be done and it was being done on equipment which is also very radical because free weights were king at that time, especially for body builders. So, Arthur Jones had approved that equipment. You know, it doesn't matter what the tool is. Matter of fact, the equipment can actually do some better things for you. Ken Hutchins realized that the protocol can even get better. So, here is Ken Hutchins' actual definition. I'm going to read it. "Exercise is a process whereby the body performs work of a demanding nature, in accordance with muscle and joint function, in a clinically controlled environment, within the constraints of safety, meaningfully loading the muscular structures to inroad their strength levels to stimulate a growth mechanism within minimal time."     What does that mean? Simple, right? [laughs] Who wrote that, Justice Ginsberg? [laughs] Yeah, exactly. [Inaudible 08:04]. Wow. I need a law degree to understand that. Yeah. [laughs] [laughs] Exactly. It's brilliant and it is a true definition because as he points out, the definition of definition is to delimit, which means that there are no other possibilities that could exist. For example, if I said somebody, please define what a pen is and they said a pen is a writing instrument. So, therefore, I can hold up a pencil, I can hold up a quill and say, well, therefore this is a pen, right? Says, no. No, actually a pen actually has ink. Oh, so, a pen is a writing instrument that uses ink? Yes. Okay. So, this quill and ink is a pen, right? Okay, so you have to define it, you have to break it down even more. You see where I'm going with this? Mhm [affirmative]. Alright. So, that's what he just did with this definition. I mean, there is no possibility of exercise being anything other than lifting weights really slowly on retrofitted equipment in a very cool environment that is going to reach a certain level of intensity. Alright. There's no other way of doing it according to this definition. He wrote this definition, to narrow down exactly how you have to perform exercise which is to life weights ten seconds up, ten seconds down, according to muscle and joint function so you better have your biomechanics right and your machines retrofitted for those biomechanics. Alright and you better do it in the minimum amount of time and reach failure pretty darn quickly and not hurt yourself in the process, he says here. That's what he just said in a very long way but, like, there is no room for error there. There's no ambiguity with a definition like that and that's his brilliance. He finally did it. Now gardening is not freaking exercise anymore. Tim: [laughs] Adam: Alright. Doctors can't tell their clients, “Oh, go on a walking program. Get some exercise.” They can't say that anymore if they go by this definition of exercise which is good because a doctor that's telling their patients that all they have to do is get out there and be active and go on a walking program because they want to save their ass because even if they die on a walking program, they can't get sued for that. Tim: [laughs] Adam: That's his definition because that is what it has to be but this is how we interoperate it and this is how we explain it to our clients which comes down to basically what Doug McGuff did, which is another great contributor to this movement, writing the book Body by Science who hopefully will be a guest on our show one time. Tim: Mhm [affirmative]. Adam: Yeah. Tim: In that definition nowhere did it say -- in Ken Hutchins' definition, nowhere did it say a leisurely activity. Adam: Right, what I've been doing and what Doug McGuff did in his book is kind of tweaked that definition for layperson, something that you can just kind of have as a mantra if you will. Alright. And have it be that [inaudible 10:51] that will guide you to deciding how you want to engage in exercise and his definition was much more succinct. To build fitness, to improve and enhance your fitness while at the same time not undermining your health and that is the essence of what Ken Hutchins wrote in his definition. Tim: And what you -- Adam: Although -- Tim: Built and based -- Adam: You know --   Yeah. Exactly. When it comes down to it you just have to work out and not hurt yourself in the process. You know, and it only -- it comes down to like doing five exercises or so to work the whole body really hard and then move on with your life. Well, Adam, I have a question. So, as we move forward with the exercise versus recreation debate, so, say somebody comes in and I'll use myself as an example. So, I want to enhance my game in softball. Right. So, somebody comes in with some specific goals because they want to get better at an activity that they enjoy for recreation. Do you tailor an exercise regime based upon that or is it pretty standard throughout? Read Doug McGuff's book. [laughs] That's an excellent question. I get asked that question all the time. You know, “I want to get better,” you know, “I'm a softball player,” to use your example. Mhm [affirmative]. And how are we going to go about that? Do we do certain exercises for throwing? Do we do certain exercises -- we're going to do plyometrics and jump side to side laterally like a shortstop would or how are we going to train for this? And the application is very general. We have to strengthen your hips. So, we're going to do a leg press. We're going to do some abductor exercises. We'll do some adductor exercises to strengthen the whole complex. We're going to do lower back exercises. We're going to strengthen your lower back but we're going to do it in a way that's not mimicking what a stress stop would do. We're going to do it the way your body was meant to move. What's great about our program is we are building all of the muscles of your body which are involved in the movements that you're going to execute when you're performing a sport. And, you know, all the people who are playing golf and playing tennis and playing softball and skiing, they've been -- you know, they report incredible testimonials about it. The bottom line is, doing leg press is not going to make you a great softball player. Doing hip abduction, lower back extensions, they're going to make your hips and your back and all the muscles involved in playing softball very strong and hopefully those joints really safe. And then it's up to you to practice that skill. So, it's a two prong approach and you do both. You have to get strong, you have to do -- you have to get strong without using up all your resources. The last thing you want to do is do an exercise program that's going to make you so tired and so fatigued and put your joints in such stress that as soon as you leap for a ball in the softball field, that's when you spasm in your back and it's because you just worked out like a crazy man in the wrong way all week long. Alright. So, what you want to do is get out of your own way when it comes to exercise and not make -- put yourself at even worse advantages. It's already a demanding sport. You don't need your exercise to be just as demanding in that sense. What you want to do is get strong and not compromise your joints. Alright. So, when you go out on a softball field you're not going to spasm. You're not going to tear something or hopefully not and it's still no guarantee. Yeah. But to get better at softball though like Mike was saying, you have to just keep playing softball and as the stronger you get without compromising your joints, it gives you your best chance of being the best softball player you can be. Just to put it simply, it's physical conditioning or strengthening versus skill. Right? There's a different skill for every activity, for every recreational activity. There's a skill that you develop and then there's the physical conditioning. So, there's those two and there's a great chapter about that in Doug McGuff's book, Body by Science. Oh, terrific. And the likelihood of actually getting hurt while you're practicing softball is going to go down significantly if you're stronger. And that was my question. It wasn't necessarily geared towards just softball but I think everything that you just said probably applies to any activity or any recreational activity that somebody might be enjoying and my question was, do you create a specific training, physical training program for that activity or is your system there at InForm Fitness pretty universal to where just about anything that you want to do whether it's golf, tennis, swimming, hiking, skiing, softball that kind of fits that mold to train physically for those activities. Alright. So, check this out. My story with this, alright. I've been staying very strong for a long time and I took up snowboarding as a 42-year-old.     Mhm [affirmative]. That's encouraging. Right. Yeah. If you talk to anybody that tries snowboarding at middle age most of them give up. They're like, “It was too hard. I was falling. I was getting hurt. I couldn't -- I didn't want to do it anymore. I didn't really stick it out.” I only was able to learn how to snowboard because I was a slow learner and it took me a good five solid days before I can kind of put a turn together on a snowboard without falling. Five solid days of being basically thrown into the ground all day long. All day long. And if it wasn't for my basic strength, my overall basic strength, there's no way I would have survived those five days. To just to get back up off my ass. Alright, on the snowboard. I mean, it was one of the hardest things I've ever attempted. And that's why a lot of people that if they're not young trying to learn how to snowboard they just don't -- they give it up because it's just too hard on the body to learn how to snowboard. It's a great testimonial to this workout that you can pick something up as physically demanding as snowboarding at the age of 42. Yeah and that's just like I said, that's a hugely demanding sport that Adam was trying to do. And we hear time and again, like we heard on the weekend when we were taping testimonials, can be as simple as gardening, you know, or doing things around the yard that people thought, “Oh, I just don't have the energy to do this anymore,” and then they start doing this workout and low and behold a few months later they're like, “Oh, this is fine again. This is easy again. I'm enjoying doing my gardening and yardwork again.”     And not just the recreational activities but just being able to work effectively to make a living. There's one woman that we interviewed that works for a television studio that's in wardrobe department and has to lift and carry and drag. We interviewed a gentleman who's in IT and has to do a lot of crawling and climbing and carrying and so this will [laughs] not only just -- this exercise won't only just benefit you so that you can be a great softball player or golfer but also help you continue to do what you not only love to do, but have to do. And how long does it take to have all these achievements, to reach all these successes. How long does it take to be able to do these things? Oh, just 20 minutes once a week. Are you fucking kidding me? [laughs] Yeah. Shorter than a television episode, right? Preach it. Hallelujah. I mean, seriously, you know if you started telling people, what would you say if I can get you to do all these things that we just talked about like being able to snowboard at 45 and not kill yourself or to be able to actually garden a full acre of land and your property and enjoy that fantasy of actually being an organic gardener and have your self-sustaining garden while you're in your golden years. Alright. Just imagine being able to do that because that's a lot of hard work. Just being able to do that and not pay the price for it. What would you do for that? Well, I don't know. What -- I mean, sounds like it takes so much. It would be like -- I mean, what was it? A five-day week workout and all that cardio and then doing weight training too like those crazy people on TV. I'm like No. No actually. How about just 20 minutes once a week and you can do all that? Yeah and realistically over time what I've noticed with these types of testimonials, when they record something like skiing its I mean, I've seen it as early as six sessions but usually within like eight or ten sessions. So, like, less than three months I think people are noticing very discernable changes in their body in regards to their sports performance or recreational activity. Alright. Thanks, Mike. That music means that we are close to the 20-minute mark in the podcast which also means if you began your slow motion high-intensity workout at the start of this podcast, you'd be finished by now. Done for the entire week. Thanks again to the gurus from InForm Fitness, Adam Zickerman, Mike Rogers, and Sheila Melody. And remember if you have a question for Adam, Mike or Sheila, or a comment regarding the power of ten, it's very simple, just shoot us an email or record a also leave us a voicemail by calling 888-983-5020, Ext. 3. That's 888-983-5020, Ext. 3. All feedback is welcome. And speaking of feedback, if you enjoyed the show, the best way to support it and to ensure that we continue to produce additional episodes is to subscribe to the podcast and please rate and review the show in iTunes, SoundCloud, Stitcher Radio, Acast, YouTube or wherever it is you might be listening. And to join InForm Nation for yourself and to give this work out a try, just visit informfitness.com for phone numbers and locations nearest you. You'll be glad you did. I am. I've been using this workout for several months. In addition to shedding a few pounds I'm feeling great and getting stronger with a minimal investment of just 20 short minutes a week. I'm Tim Edwards, reminding you to join us in our next episode as we continue our discussion on high intensity training with the InForm Fitness podcast, 20 minutes with Adam Zickerman and friends here on the Inbound Podcasting Network.

Special guest and show contributor Mike Santasiero joins the conversation about the issue with police, white impositions of black community; Justice Ginsberg crosses every separation line and Breanna Stewart wants...what, fame equality, is that a thing?

DOES BOOZE MAKE US HORNY? Author and science journalist Adam Rogers ("Proof: The Science of Booze") takes us through the sex & alcohol laboratories and reveals all the butt stuff along the way. BUT FIRST! Attorney Allan Gelbard explains this week's Supreme Court decision placing the employer between a woman and her doctor. TOPICS: The Effect of Ethanol on the Brain, Magic Mushrooms, Scientific Mysteries, Placebo Booze, "Drunken Comportment," Soda Pop Opiates, Drunken Promiscuity, Unsafe Sex, Increased Aggression, Gin vs Bourbon, Psychoactive Mechanisms, Thujone, Horny-Making, Inebriated Arousal, Erections, Hangovers and THE POWER OF SUGGESTION! BONUS: Contraception, Hobby Lobby, Enforcing Beliefs on Others, Religious Freedom, Justice Ginsberg, Corporate Taxation, Fertility Issues, 401k Hypocrisy, Viagra, Unpaid Maternity Leave, Election Repercussions, Voting, Sex Positive Professionals and Critical Reasoning.