Podcasts about Christoph

Wer behält den Überblick in der vernetzten Gebäudetechnik – und was passiert, wenn die Heizung nicht weiß, dass die Lüftung gerade kühlen will?

Eine superschlaue künstliche Intelligenz könnte schon bald die Menschheit auslöschen. Zunehmend warnen auch seriöse Forscher vor KI-Agenten, die ohne moralischen Kompass ihre eigenen Ziele verfolgen. Lassen sich die Systeme noch zähmen? Drösser, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Wissenschaft im Brennpunkt

Leibold, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Kultur heute

Live-Webinar am 11.12.2025, 18 Uhr: "Wie du aus dem Tagesgeschäft aussteigst & den Wert deiner Firma steigerst" - hier anmelden und kostenlos dabei sein! In dieser Episode sprechen Christoph und Tobias über eine akute Unternehmenskrise eines Kunden – und was wir alle tun können, um gar nicht erst in solche Situationen zu geraten. Sie zeigen, wie wichtig vorausschauende Planung und der klare Blick auf die Zahlen ist. Dabei geben sie konkrete Impulse für Prävention, finanzielle Steuerung, die Rolle des CFOs im Mittelstand und wie man durch gezielte Simulationen bessere Entscheidungen trifft. Diese Folge ist ein Muss für alle Unternehmer:innen, die sich gegen wirtschaftliche Unsicherheiten wappnen wollen!Was dich erwartet:Warum viele Unternehmen aktuell in Schwierigkeiten geratenWie du ein einfaches Finanzmodell in Excel erstellstDer Unterschied zwischen Hoffnung und HandlungsfähigkeitWas ein guter CFO leisten muss – auch in kleinen UnternehmenWie du gezielt Szenarien durchspielst und daraus ableitest, was zu tun istEmpfohlene Folge zum Thema Krisenmanagement: Hier anhören_______________________

Sterz, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, @mediasres

Eine superschlaue künstliche Intelligenz könnte schon bald die Menschheit auslöschen. Zunehmend warnen auch seriöse Forscher vor KI-Agenten, die ohne moralischen Kompass ihre eigenen Ziele verfolgen. Lassen sich die Systeme noch zähmen? Drösser, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Wissenschaft im Brennpunkt

Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Informationen am Mittag

Ein DenkDuett über das, was uns alle angeht - ob wir darüber nachdenken wollen, oder nicht mit Catherine Newmark und Christoph Quarch Wie kommt die Philosophie aus dem Elfenbeinturm und was hat sie den Menschen im 21. Jahrhundert zu sagen? Catherine beschäftigt sich viel mit der Frage. Nicht nur als Philosophin, sondern auch als Journalistin, die bei der DLF-Sendung „Sein und Streit“ ihre Gesprächspartner dazu bringt, philosophische Gedanken auf die Fragen der Gegenwart anzuwenden. Im Gespräch mit Christoph geht es um die Frage, wie philosophische Gespräche im öffentlichen Raum geführt werden können und warum das Gespräch noch immer der Königsweg des Denkens ist Buchempfehlung: Warum auf Autoritäten hören? ISBN 978-3411750443 Platon und die Folgen (Hörbuch-Fassung - Buchtitel ist vergriffen) von Christoph Quarch *** DenkDuett - wir bringen erneut unser wunderbares Gesprächsformat zu euch, denn gemeinsames Denken ist am Wirkreichsten. DenkDuett - ein freies Spiel der Gedanken; nicht vorgefertigt und abgerufen, sondern frisch und freihändig im Augenblick entwickelt. Die Themen variieren. Jedes Mal aber gibt es neuen Stoff zum Mit- und Weiterdenken, wenn der Philosoph Christoph Quarch mit seinem Gast ins Gespräch kommt.

In unserem Format „Tipp um Tipp“ laden wir euch ein, mit uns zu quizzen. Wir beschreiben Euch einmal pro Woche in 15 bis 20 Hinweisen ein Brettspiel. Wie schnell bekommt Ihr es heraus? Am Ende gibt es direkt die Auflösung.  Schreibt uns gerne, wie Euch das Quiz gefällt oder sagt einfach hallo. Ihr erreicht uns unter info@doppelbrett.com, auf Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/doppelbrett_com/) oder bei Mastodon (https://podcasts.social/@doppelbrett). Wir freuen uns auch über eine Bewertung z.B. bei Apple Podcasts oder Spotify.

In der heutigen Folge hört ihr eine bekannte Stimme, aber eine neue Marke. Christoph Ganahl ist den regelmäßigen Hörern bereits aus Folge 92 und als Inhaber von AVO bekannt. Christoph hat aber vor knapp einem Jahr eine weitere Marke ins Leben gerufen. Mit den Sneaker von Madoo orientiert sich Christoph im Design an Skaterschuhen wie Vans und Co. Doch die Genialität steckt hier in der Geschichte hinter dem Schuh. Innovative Fertigungsmethoden, ein echtes Kreislaufsystem der Umwelt zu liebe und die gesunden Eigenschaften von Barfußschuhen machen die Sneaker von Madoo zu einem echten Muss in jedem Schuhschrank. Mehr dazu hört ihr in dieser Folge von Christoph selbst. Die Marke Madoo findet ihr auf ihrer Webseite (https://madoo-footwear.com/) [Madoo auf Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/madoo_footwear/) [Die FB Gruppe zum Podcast](https://www.facebook.com/groups/370125074000880) [Alexander Tok auf Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/barfuss_im_pott) [Alexander Tok auf Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/BarfussimPott) [Rabattcodes und Partnerlinks findest du hier](https://barfuss-im-pott.de/links/)

Leibold, Christoph www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Fazit

Leibold, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Kultur heute

In episode 471 of The Reformed Brotherhood, hosts Jesse Schwamb and Tony Arsenal begin a multi-part series on Jesus's parables of lost things in Luke 15. This first installment focuses on the Parable of the Lost Sheep, exploring how Jesus uses this story to reveal God's disposition toward sinners. The hosts examine the contextual significance of this teaching as Jesus's response to the Pharisees' criticism of his fellowship with tax collectors and sinners. Through careful analysis of the text, they unpack how this parable not only rebukes religious self-righteousness but also reveals the active, seeking love of Christ for His own. The discussion highlights the profound theological truth that God's joy is made complete in the restoration of His lost children. Key Takeaways The Parable of the Lost Sheep demonstrates Christ's heart for sinners, showing that seeking the lost is not exceptional behavior but the expected norm for those who understand God's character. Jesus positions this parable as a direct response to the Pharisees' criticism, turning their accusation ("he eats with sinners") into an affirmation of His mission and identity. The lost sheep represents those who belong to Christ but have gone astray; the shepherd's pursuit illustrates Christ's commitment to recover all whom the Father has given Him. God's rejoicing over one repentant sinner reveals a profound theological truth: divine joy increases in the act of showing mercy and restoring the lost. The shepherd's willingness to leave the 99 to find the one reflects not recklessness but the infinite value God places on each of His children. Regular worship practices, including family worship and congregational singing, reflect the same disposition of praise that heaven displays when sinners return to God. The parable serves not only as a comfort to sinners but as a challenge to believers to adopt God's heart toward the lost rather than the judgmental attitude of the Pharisees. Understanding the Shepherd's Heart The central focus of the Parable of the Lost Sheep is not simply God's willingness to receive sinners, but His active pursuit of them. As Tony Arsenal points out, Jesus presents the shepherd's search not as an extraordinary act of sacrifice, but as the obvious and expected response: "What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he has lost one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the one that is lost?" Jesus frames this as the normal behavior that any shepherd would exhibit, making the Pharisees' lack of concern for "lost sheep" appear not just uncompassionate but utterly irrational. This reveals a profound truth about God's character: He is not passively waiting for sinners to find their way back to Him; He is actively seeking them out. As Jesse Schwamb emphasizes, "Christ's love is an active, working love." The shepherd does not merely hope the sheep will return; he goes after it until he finds it. This reflects God's covenant commitment to His people—those whom He has chosen before the foundation of the world. The parable thus powerfully illustrates the doctrines of divine election and effectual calling within a deeply personal and relational framework. The Divine Joy in Restoration Perhaps the most striking element of this parable is the emphasis on the shepherd's joy upon finding his lost sheep. This isn't merely relief at recovering lost property, but profound celebration that calls for community participation: "Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep that was lost." Jesse highlights Thomas Goodwin's profound insight that "Christ's own joy, comfort, happiness, and glory are increased and enlarged by his showing grace and mercy." This suggests something remarkable about God's relationship with His people—that in some mysterious way, God's joy is made more complete in the act of showing mercy and restoring sinners. The hosts point out that this doesn't imply any deficiency in God, but rather reveals the relational nature of His love. When Jesus states that "there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance," He's indicating that divine celebration isn't prompted merely by moral perfection but by restoration and reconciliation. This understanding transforms how we approach God when we've strayed. As Jesse notes, "Jesus is never tired, flustered, or frustrated when we come to him for fresh forgiveness or renewed pardon." Our repentance doesn't merely avoid punishment; it actually brings joy to the heart of God. This is a profound comfort for believers struggling with sin and failure, assuring us that our return is met not with divine disappointment but with heavenly celebration. Memorable Quotes "This parable of the lost sheep gives us the beating heart of God, his normative disposition toward his children. It's really an exceptional and special window into God's design, his loving compassion for us, his heart of ministry and seeking for us, for his children who are lost." - Jesse Schwamb "He wants us to draw on his grace and mercy because it is inherently who he is. And he drew near to us in this incarnation so that his joy and ours could rise and fall together, which is insane that God would come and condescend to that degree that in his giving mercy and in ours receiving it, Christ gets more joy and comfort than we do when we come to him for help and mercy." - Jesse Schwamb "Christ's love is an active working love. Just as the shepherd did not sit still, wailing for his lost sheep, so our blessed Lord did not sit still in heaven pitying sinners. He comes to us, he came to us, and he continues to draw to himself those who are sheep, who hear his voice." - Jesse Schwamb Host Information Jesse Schwamb and Tony Arsenal are the hosts of The Reformed Brotherhood, a podcast that explores Reformed theology and its application to the Christian life. With a blend of theological depth and practical insight, they examine Scripture through the lens of historic Reformed doctrine, offering accessible teaching for believers seeking to grow in their understanding of the faith. Resources Mentioned Scripture: Luke 15:1-7, Matthew 18, John 10 Worship Resource: Sing The Worship Initiative (sing.theworshipinitiative.com) Theological Reference: Thomas Goodwin's writings on Christ's joy in redemption Brad Kafer and Michael Lewis, The Theocast Tragedy, episode 75, with guest Jeremy Marshall, November 16, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-reclamation-podcast/id1747221237?i=1000736883898. Joshua Lewis and Michael Rowntree, The Theocast Split: Examining Christian Unity and Theological Differences, November 11, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-remnant-radios-podcast/id1392545186?i=1000736293538. Daniel Vincent, Fallout of Theocast, November 15, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-particular-baptist-podcast/id1512601040?i=1000736872315. Tony Arsenal, "A Refutation of Reformed Fringe," Reformed Arsenal, November 2025, https://reformedarsenal.com/category/a-refutation-of-reformed-fringe/. Tony Arsenal, "The Quest For Illegitimate Religious Gnosis: How 'Fringe' Theology Deforms Christology," Heidelblog, November 24, 2025, https://heidelblog.net/2025/11/the-quest-for-illegitimate-religious-gnosis-how-fringe-theology-deforms-christology/. Full Transcript [00:00:08] Jesse Schwamb: And what's special about the series? Parables that we're about to look at is it gives us the beating heart of God, his normative disposition toward his children, which is not like, we haven't seen some of that already, but this is, I think, really an exceptional and special window into God's design. His loving can compare for us, his heart of ministry and seeking for us for his children who are lost. It's really unequal in all the parables and probably among some of the most famous, Welcome to episode 471 of the Reformed Brotherhood. I'm Jesse. [00:00:56] Tony Arsenal: And I'm Tony. And this is the podcast with ears to hear. Hey brother. [00:01:01] Jesse Schwamb: Hey brother. You know, it seems like sometimes we could just summarize the teaching of Jesus like this. You get a parable and you get a parable, and you get a parable, and we've already, by looking at some of these parables, gotten to see what the kingdom of God means. The kingdom of God is Jesus coming in His power. It's here, but also not yet. The kingdom of God is the judgment of God. The kingdom of God is a blessing of God. The kingdom of God is the treasure of God. And what's special about the series? Parables that we're about to look at is it gives us the beating heart of God, his normative disposition toward his children, which is not like, we haven't seen some of that already, but this is, I think, really an exceptional and special window into God's design. His loving can compare for us, his heart of ministry and seeking for us for his children who are lost. It's really unequal in all the parables and probably among some of the most famous, and I think we'll probably have some maybe like semi hot takes, maybe some like mid hot takes as the young kids say. [00:02:07] Tony Arsenal: Mid hot takes. [00:02:08] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah. [00:02:08] Tony Arsenal: So like [00:02:09] Jesse Schwamb: lukewarm takes, well my thought is like, what is a hot take that's not heretical? Do you know what I mean? So it's gotta be, yeah, [00:02:16] Tony Arsenal: there you go. [00:02:16] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah. That's what I'm saying. It's like, listen, we want to be orthodox in our approach here, but I think we gotta, we gotta chew these up a little bit. Like we gotta digest them, we gotta move them around in our gut and really take everything that we've, we thought we knew about these, we just heard and they've been written on cards or postcards or crocheted into, I guess you're not crocheting bible verses, but like cross stitching Bible verses on pillows and really go deep because I think there's so much here for us, and if this were like for, for everybody that wants to say that, sometimes we take a little bit too long with our series. Again, I do have a question, simple question for all of those people. And that question is how dare you? And the second thing I would say is, you're lucky that you're not listening to a Puritan podcast. Maybe you never would, like at the Puritans in a podcast, the series would never end. They'd start with like a single verse and be like, we're gonna do two episodes on this. And then they'd be getting to the like, you know, 4 71 and they still wouldn't have left like the, the first five words. [00:03:11] Tony Arsenal: It's true, it's true. We move a little bit faster than that. Pace. Not much. Yeah. Way, [00:03:15] Jesse Schwamb: listen, way faster. By like Puritan standards, we are cruising. Like we're, we're just like NASCAR going through these parables. And to that end, I'll try to keep us moving though. I've already delayed us already because we're, we're late for affirmations. [00:03:30] Affirmations and Denials [00:03:30] Jesse Schwamb: Denials. The time is ripe. It is Now. The fields are gleaning with affirmations and denials. So let's, let's bring them in. Tony, are you denying against, are you affirming with something? [00:03:40] Tony Arsenal: It's a little bit of both, I guess. Um, do it. [00:03:44] Controversial Theology Discussion [00:03:44] Tony Arsenal: A little while ago, uh, it was maybe back in September, I did an episode on, uh, some theology that was being propagated by a podcast called Reformed Fringe. Um, it was a solo episode, so if you haven't listened to it, go back and listen to it. The affirmation here comes in, in, uh, the form of a show called, I think it's called The Reclamation Cast. Um, there are a series of podcasts that have addressed some of the same issues. For those who haven't been following it, which I would assume is probably most of you, the issue is kind of blown up online. Um, Theo Cast, which was a pretty big a, a really big podcast in the, uh, sort of reformed ish, particular Baptist world. Um, they actually split because of this. And so John Moffitt was one of the hosts. Justin Perdue was the other. And then John was also on this show called Reform Fringe with Doug Van Dorn. So I'm affirming some of these other podcasts that have covered the same issue, and I would encourage you to seek them out and listen to them. I can can pull some links together for the show notes today. Um, more or less the, the issue that I identified, um, is beyond just sort of what's known as Divine Counsel Theology, which was made, made, really made popular by, um, Michael Heiser. I don't know that he would, we could say that he was necessarily like the. Architect or inventor of that. I'm sure there are people who've had similar thoughts before that, but he's really the main name. Um, he's passed on now, but, um, Doug Van Dorn was a, uh, he's a Baptist pastor outta Col, uh, Colorado, who took his views and actually sort of like cranked him up and particularly. Uh, troubling is the way he handles, um, the angel of the Lord in the Old Testament. Um, I won't go into all of the details, but he wants to argue and he has argued in writing actually, and he, he published the paper first in 2015, and then again in 2024, he published it again, uh, with very minimal changes and nothing substantial. It was really kind of contextual stuff. Um, he actually argues that in the Old Testament, when we see the angel of the Lord, it's not just, not just God appearing as an angel, it's God actually becoming an angel. And in his paper, at least, he argues, um, more or less that this is a sort of hypostatic union. It's not just a temporary taking on of some sort of like outward appearance. Um, it's an actual, uh, uh, assumption of properties into the person of the sun. And the whole reason he makes this argument, which is why it's a little disingenuine, that now he's saying that's not what his argument was. He makes this argument in order to make it so the angel of the Lord can genuinely suffer, experience passions, change his mind, um, enter into covenant, come to know new knowledge, like there's all sorts of things that he wants the angel of the Lord to be able to actually do, not just accommodated, but actually. Experience. Um, and he does that by having the angel of the Lord be an appropriation of angelic properties into the person of the sun, what we would call a hypostatic union. And in his paper, he actually says like, I would want to use all of the same language of, uh, of this union as I do of the incarnation. He intentionally uses the words image and form kind of drawing from Philippians two. So the, the affirmation comes in and there are other podcasts that have identified this. So it's not just me. I would encourage people to go find them. Where the denial comes in is, um, there have been many people, including myself, who have attempted to engage with Doug Van Dorn, like publicly, directly, um, through private messaging. There are many people who've tried to reach out to him, and he has just sort of waved all of them away. Which is one thing, if like you just say like, I don't really care to interact with you. I don't really care to have this discussion. But then he is also presenting the situation as though he, he is totally open to having these conversations and nobody is trying to reach out to him. So I would encourage everyone, you're all reasonable people, search the scriptures, read what he has to say. The paper that he wrote is called Passing the Impassable pa or impassable Impasse, which is hard to say, but it's a very clever title. Um, and it was, it actually was written, I don't know a lot about this controversy and maybe I need to do a little bit more research. It was actually written during a time where, um, the particular Baptist conventions that were out out west where experiencing a lot of internal controversy regarding impassability, and this was his proposal for how, how biblically you can still maintain the divine attributes of changeness and impassability all these things, uh, without compromising the real, the real passable, um, appearance that we see of the, of God in the Bible. So. I don't wanna belabor the point. This is not the point of the show. We, I already did a whole episode on this. I've published, I wrote many blog articles. There's a lot that I've, I've put out on this. Um, so check it out, look at it. Wait for yourself. Um, the only reason I've been, this has come up in our telegram chat. People have encountered this theology. Um, one, one guy was asking about it, 'cause I think like his mom or his aunt or someone close to him had, has been sort of reading Michael Heider's work. Michael Heiser was very instrumental at logos. He was on staff at Logos for quite a while. So a lot of their, um, more speculative theological articles that you might find on their website are written by him. Um, he was a, one of the main people behind the sort of proprietary translation that, um, Laro uses the Lham, um, English Bible. So. It's not a neutral point. Pretty significant theological consequences if, uh, if our reading of what Doug is saying is correct. Um, and there doesn't seem to be any real openness to discussing that. He has to be fair, he has published a series of affirmations and denials, um, affirming his a his orthodoxy saying he affirms the change changeness of the son. He denies that there was a hypothetic union. So that's encouraging. It's great to see that when it comes down to it. He's willing to make affirmations, uh, of orthodox things and to deny unorthodox things, but it doesn't really help the situation when those things and those affirmations, denials are still at very least difficult to reconcile with what he wrote. I think in point of fact, they're actually contradictory to what he wrote. So the, the proper course of action would be for him to say, well, no, that's not what I meant. Or, or, yes, I wrote that, but that's not what I believe. Um, rather than to just try say, trying to say like, well, you all got it wrong. There's a lot of people reading these papers looking at it going, Ooh, it sure seems like the sun took on an angelic nature, even if that was temporary. That's, that's got some pretty weird consequences for your theology. And one of the shows I was listening to made this point that I thought was interesting and a little scary is this is like an utterly new theology. Um, no one that I've talked to who is aware of this, who studied these issues. Is aware of anyone ever saying anywhere that the angel of the Lord in the Old Testament was some sort of like assumption of actual angelic properties into the person of the sun. Almost everywhere that you read. It's either a manifestation view where the sun is kind of appearing as an angel, um, but it's not actually becoming an angel. It's, it's sort of taking on created medium, uh, in order to reveal himself or an instrumental view, which would be something like there's an angel that is used instrumentally by the Lord, and so we can say that it the angel of the Lord is the Lord in an instrumental sense, kind of like saying like if I pick up a hammer. Use that hammer for as long as I'm using that hammer. The hammer is actually sort of an extension of me. I'm moving it, I'm motivating it, I'm controlling it, it's connected to me, and then I put it down when I'm finished. Those are kind of the two main views that people, people would argue in the Old Testament, if they want to even say that the angel of the Lord is a Christoph, it would either be this manifestation view or this instrumental view, this sort of weird novel assumption of properties view. I'm, I've never encountered anything like that and I've studied this, this, this particular issue at some length. So check out the other episodes, I'll pull together some links, uh, of ones that have done it, both that have been, uh, critical of Doug's position. And also there was one, um, on remnant radio, which I never heard of, but, um, that was acknowledging that there are some question marks, but sort of saying like, this really is an overblown controversy. Um, and then I'll link to Doug's podcast too, so you can listen to his own words and, and sort of think through it yourself. [00:11:51] Jesse Schwamb: Some point I have this volition, you know, places, organizations, groups might have like FAQs, frequently asked questions. I have this idea to put together for us, like a frequently discussed topic. This would be one of them. We've talked, or we co we've come back to this idea of like the molecule way, the messenger of the Lord many times. Yeah. In part because I think there's a good and natural curiosity among many when you're reading the scriptures and you see that's the angel of the Lord and you're trying to discern, is it Christoph? And in some cases it seems more clear than others. For instance, the Maia appearing to, you know, Joshua, or, you know, there's, there's all kinds of instances in the scripture that draw us into this sense of like, well, who is it that is being represented here? And the funny thing about this though, and I agree with you, that like makes it. Puts it in like, I would say contradistinction to like just kind of innocently wanting to understand is that there's a lot of theological gymnastics happening here, like a lot and two, it seems to me that he's kind of trying to create a problem to find a solution on this one. Yeah. And so it should give everybody that sense that we always talk about where like the red light goes off, the flags get thrown up, that when you hear that, you're just like, well, something is not right about that. And the thing that's not right about it is one, it doesn't subscribe to, like you're saying, any kind of historical orthodoxy. And two, it's just funky for funky sake. It's, there's really a lot that's happening there to get to some kind of end, and it's better to know what that end is. I'm glad you brought that up. So I think you can, everybody who's listening can weigh, like, if you. Don't wanna weigh into that, or you don't really need to solve the problem that's being created here, then don't bother with it altogether. Yeah. Uh, it's just not worth your time. But people, this is the hide thing. Like when, when we are challenged to be discerning people, when we are challenged to take scriptures at face value, there is always a tendency for us sometimes to go too deep, to get too wild with it, to try to turn around and bend it to, to answer all in every single question. And even the reform tradition doesn't attempt to do that. So here, there is something that's beautiful about these certain mysteries of God and to take him at his face, to trust him in his word, we should seek, seek out many things. Some things are just not worth seeking out. So, you know, the Internet's gonna internet and people are gonna, people and theologians are gonna theologize. And sometimes that's good and sometimes it's not that productive. [00:14:08] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I, I think to be as charitable as I possibly can be, I think, um, Doug is, has identified a legitimate. Question about the Old Testament, right? Right. The, the Bible appears when we read about God in the Old Testament. He appears to do things like change his mind, suffer yes. Grieve experience passions. Right. Um, and, and so that's a real, um, question that needs to be answered as you read the Old Testament. Um, and the two options of course, or the two primary options of course, are either that God actually suffers, he actually experiences those things, in which case he wouldn't be a changeless God. Um, he wouldn't be a perfect God because there's these, these modes of change within God. The other option would be that there's some sort of appearance of suffering or appearance of, of change or passions that is not actual, it's not real in the sense that he's not God's lying. It's not that God's lying to us, of course not. But that these are appearances for our sake. We would say that's, we call that the doctrine of accommodation. Right. Um. What Doug tries to do is actually exactly what the church did in trying to understand how it could be that the second person of the Trinity suffered. Uh, why, why we can genuinely say that God suffered. Um, we can say that and that the answer was the hypothetic union, and this is where it really kind of like jumped into full relief for me is Doug has the same answer for the Old Testament, but instead of an incarnation of humanity, I don't know what you would call it, an, an evangelization or a, something like that, um, he would probably call like a, some somatization. Um, he uses the difference between Soma and sars as though that somehow answers the question. He says it's not a, an incarnation into sarks. It's a, an assumption of properties in da Soma. But in either case, like his answer is the same answer. That the way that the angel of the Lord suffers in the Old Testament is not according to his divine nature. It's according to these angelic properties that are assumed into his person well. Okay, so like you get the same conclusion. There needs to be some explanation now of like, well, why is it a hypostatic union when it's the human nature, but it's not a hypostatic union when it's the angelic nature or angelic properties. Um, and I think the, the real answer is that when Doug wrote those papers, he just didn't realize those implications. Um, Doug is a sharp guy, like, don't get me wrong, he's a smart guy. Um, I think he's got a pretty good grip on Hebrew and, and a lot of this too is, um. Not to make this more of an episode than it is, but, um, this Divine Council worldview at first feels like not that big of a deal when you, when you read about it the first time. Um, or when you read sort of like popular treatments of it. Um, the real problem is that this divine council worldview, um, which I'm not gonna define again, you can look, I'll pull the radio episode or the other podcast episodes, but this divine council worldview becomes like the controlling meta narrative for the entire scripture for these guys. And so if, if the son is to be the sort of lead Elohim on this divine council besides Yahweh himself, then he has to become an angel. He has to become a one of the sons of God in order to do this. Sort of almost ignoring the fact that like he already was the son of God. Like, it, it just becomes, um, this controlling meta-narrative. And if all that this, all that this divine council worldview is saying is like, yes, there's a class of creatures. Um, that are spiritual in nature and the Bible uses the word Elohim to describe them and also uses the word Elohim to describe the one true God who's in an entirely different class. And it just happens to use the same, the same word to describe those two classes. Okay. Like I would find a different way to say that that's maybe not as risky and confusing, but that would be fine. But this goes so much farther than than that. And now it has all these weird implications. He actually did a five, five-part sermon series at his church where his argument is essentially that like this. This overarching narrative of the Sons of God and, and the 70 sons of God. Um, that that's actually the story that explains how salvation functions and what we're being saved to is we're not being swept into the life of the Trinity, which is kind of the classic Christian view, the classic orthodox view that because, because of who the son is by nature, in reference to the father, when we're adopted, we gain that same relationship with the father and the son and the spirit. Um, he's, he's wanting to say, it's actually more like, no, we, we we're sort of brought onto this divine council as, as creator representatives of the cosmos. So it's, it, there's a lot to, it's, um, again, I, I don't want people just to take my word for it. I'm gonna provide as many receipts as I can, um, in the, the, um, show notes. Um, but yeah, it's, it's weird and it, it's unnecessary and [00:18:57] Jesse Schwamb: that's right. [00:18:58] Tony Arsenal: It made a lot of sense to me when Michael Heiser went down these routes, because his whole program was, he had a, a podcast called The Naked Bible, and the whole idea was like he interprets the Bible apart from any prior interpretations, which of course we know is not possible. But that was sort of his plan was he's. It wasn't necessarily anti cre, anti-real or anticon confessional. He just thought you needed to and could come to the Bible without any sort of pre interpretive, uh, positions. Um, so it made a lot of sense to me when he was like, well, yeah, this isn't the way that the historic tradition isn't understood this, but that doesn't matter. But then you have someone like Doug Van Dorn come around who claims to be a 1689 Confessional Baptist. This is like radically foreign to that system of doctrine. So it's just a weird situation. It's kind of an abandonment of the pattern of sound words that handed down to us, the ages. Um, and it does have all these weird implications, and I'm not hearing loud and clear. I am not saying Doug Van Dorn is not a Christian. Um, I do think that the implications of what he's teaching are heretical. Um, but we've made the distinction before that like, just because you teach something heretical doesn't mean you're a heretic. Um, that's a, that's a formal proclamation that the church officially makes not some dude on the internet with a podcast. But the, the implications of his teaching are quite dangerous. So. Check it out. Read it with caution and with discernment, um, and with, you know, a good systematic theology that can help kind of correct you in your hands. And the creeds and the confessions. But dude, check it out. You, you're reasonable people. Look at the scriptures yourself and make your own decisions. I don't expect anybody to ever just take my word for any of this stuff. [00:20:25] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah, that's right. Or like you said, don't bother with. Yeah. Or don't bother. Just read the confessions. Unaware of it. Yeah. That's also, okay. Stick to the, the, hopefully the good local preaching and teaching that you're receiving and just hang out there. Yeah. And that's also okay. The internet is a super strange and weird place. Yeah. And that includes even among well intentions. Theology, sometimes it just gets weird. And this is one of those examples. [00:20:51] Tony Arsenal: It's true, it's true. I often tell people that my, my goal in any sort of public teaching or podcasting or blogging or when I'm preaching, uh, my goal is to be as like vanilla reformed as I possibly can. Like that's what I'm saying. There, there are times where like some of the stuff that I be, like, I, I'm not like straight down the middle on every single thing. There are things that I would, you know, like my view on, um, state relations with church like that, that's not exactly run of the mill vanilla presbyterianism. Um, so there are definitely things where I'm, I'm sort of a little off center on, um, but I try to be like right down the middle of the vanilla, vanilla aisle here with maybe a little bit of chocolate sauce here and there. But it's, it's pretty, uh, my reform theology is pretty boring and I'm fine with that. I love [00:21:35] Jesse Schwamb: it. I love it. It's okay to be boring, isn't it? Like boring? It's is for the most part, right. On the money. Because often when we do take our views and we polarize them to some degree, we know that there's a greater probability propensity for the errors to lie there if you're always hanging out there. Yeah. But especially in this, again, you've said all the right things it, it's just one of those things. But it's a good mark for all of us to understand that when we move so far away from orthodoxy that we're just kind of out on the pier by ourselves and you're looking around, you ought to ask what happened that you're out there so far. [00:22:05] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Well, Jesse, save us from this train of thought. What are you affirming or denying today? [00:22:10] Jesse Schwamb: I hope I have something that's exactly the opposite. As you know, Tony, not all affirmations especially are created equal because sometimes we throw one out there and it's, it's good. We think it's great. Maybe not for everybody. It doesn't resonate. It doesn't hit. This is not one of those, this is for everybody. [00:22:24] The Importance of Daily Worship [00:22:24] Jesse Schwamb: I'm coming in with a hot, strong affirmation, and that is one of the things you and I have promulgated for so long is the beauty, the necessity, the responsibility, and the joy of regular daily worship, and that can look. Lots of ways, but I think you and I have tried in our own lives and we've spoken a lot about the high conviction that we have that that kinda worship should be participatory and it can involve reading the scriptures, praying, singing this spills over into convictions about family worship, leading our families, and that kinda experience, even if it's just a little bit every day and even if it's, we give it our best efforts, this is not like a kind of legalistic approach. And so I just came across something that I think I've been testing for a while that I think is faab fabulous for everybody, could be helpful to you in daily worship. And I'm just gonna give you the website first and explain what it is. Secondly, so the website is sing the worship initiative.com. That's sing dot the worship initiative.com. You can find it if it's easier. Just search the Worship initiative. What this is, is it is. Once you sign up for this, you'll actually get a text. It's a daily text, and that text will be a link in a browser every day. So it's not a podcast, but it comes through a browser every day. It is a time of, I would say, I'll use the word colloquially, it's a time of devotional with singing led by Shane and Shane and some of their other musicians and their friends. And this is glorious. It's no more than 15 minutes, and it's purposely orchestrated to lead you or whoever's listening with you in singing, including in the app or rather in the browser. They will give you the words for the songs that they're gonna sing that day. And one, Shannon and Shane are fantastic musicians. You wanna listen to this with a good speaker or set of, uh, earbuds because, uh, the music is great and it's very stripped down. It's just, it's just piano and a little bit guitar generally. Uh, but the speaking of the theological pieces of what's in these songs is fantastic. And this just past week, they've done songs like Crown Hit with Many Crowns. Um, in Christ Alone, he will hold me fast, he will hold me fast, is an incredible piece of music and a piece of worship. So I'm just enjoying, they are using rich deeply theological songs to speak rich, deep theological truths, and then to invite you into a time of singing, like along with them. It's as if like they were just in your living room or in their kitchen and said, Hey, you got 15 minutes, especially start the day. Why don't we gather around this table and why don't we worship together? So I haven't found something quite like this where it's like an invitation to participate, both by being active listeners into what they're saying, but by also singing together. So I. Can only come at this with a really hot affirmation because I'm being blessed by it. And this rhythm of somebody like leading you daily into song, I'm finding to be so incredibly valuable. Of course, like we can find song in lots of places. We may lead ourselves, we may rely on the radio or a playlist to do that, but this kind of unique blend of a time that's being set apart, that's organized around a theme and then brings music into that as a form of meditation and worship is pretty singular. So check out, sing the worship edition of.com and especially if you're a fan of Shane and Shane, you're gonna slide right into this and feel very blessed because they're talented musicians and what they're bringing, I think is a, is a rich theological practice of actual worship, not just devotionals of some kind, but like actual participatory worship of, of in spirit and truth. [00:25:53] Tony Arsenal: Yeah, I just signed up for this while you're talking. It took about a minute. It's super easy. So, um, and I'm sure that they have a way to opt out. If you start it and you hate it and you want to just stop getting text messages, I'm sure you can just respond, stop. Um, so there's really nothing to lose. There's no gimmick. They don't ask for a credit card, anything like that. Um, and I, I'm with you, like I love me some Shane and Shane music, and I do like some Shane and Shane music, um, that, that like takes me way back. Those, there are a lot of singers who've been at this for a long time. Yes, Shane and Shane was like. A really like popular band when I was in like, like upper high school. Oh yeah. So like, we're talking about a multi-decade career, long career doing mostly worship music, like they're performers, but they have entire, they have entire, many entire, um, albums that are psalms, um, entire albums that are worship choruses or what you might think of as chorus singing. Um, so yeah, I think this is great. And I'm always looking for new ways to integrate worship into my life. So this could be something as simple as like, maybe you're not gonna be able to sing out loud, but you could listen to this on the bus on the way home. Or you could put in your air, your ear pods, uh, when you're, you know, doing the dishes and instead of just listening to another podcast. I recognize the irony of saying that on a podcast that you may be listening to while you're doing the dishes, but instead of just listening to another podcast, you spend a little bit of time thinking about meditating on God's word. So that's great. I think that's an awesome, awesome information. A little [00:27:20] Jesse Schwamb: bit like very casual liturgy, but you're right, they've been around for a while and this, the content that they're producing here strikes me as like very mature. Yeah, both like in, of course, like the music they're doing and how they're singing, they're singing parts, but also just what they're speaking into. It's not just like kind of a, let's let tell you how this song impacted my life. They're, they're pulling from the scriptures and they're praying through. They're giving you a moment to stop and pause and pray yourself. There's a lot that's, that's built in there. And can I give like one other challenge? [00:27:47] Encouragement for Family Worship [00:27:47] Jesse Schwamb: This, this came to me as well this week and I know we've had some conversation in the telegram chat about like family worship, leading our families in worship about somehow how do we model that? How do we bring that together? And music often being a part of that. And I think that it's especially important for families to hear their. Their fathers and their husbands sing, no matter what your voice sounds like. Can I give a, a challenge? I think might sound crazy. This might be a hot, hot take. And so you can bring me back down instead of a mid hot take. If it, yeah, if it's a little bit too hot. But I was reading an article, and this is really from that article, and it, it did challenge me. And the article basically challenged this and said, listen, most people are actually far more musical than they understand themselves to be. And that might just not be in the instrumentation of the voice, but in other ways. And so the challenge was if you're a, a husband, a father, maybe you have some proclivity of music, maybe you have none. The challenge was basically, why don't you consider. Learning a musical instrument to lead your family in worship. And, and the challenge was basically like, pick up a guitar and, uh, see if you can eke out a couple of chords. Work through that just for the sole purpose of if nothing else, but saying like, I want to participate in something differently in my home. And maybe that's getting a keyboard and just, just trying it there. If I can play the guitar, anybody truly I think can play the guitar. It's, it's not really that difficult. I just found this captivating that this guy laid down the gauntlet and said, maybe you ought to consider doing that if only to be a model of worship in your own home throughout, throughout the week. And I just thought, you know what? That's something we're thinking about. I think all of us have something there. And that might be for some, like, maybe it means strengthening your personal prayer closet. So like your example in time of, of corporate worship of your family is stronger. Maybe it means your study of the scriptures, not just of course for like pure devotional life, but to instruct or to practice that scripture for your family. So I, I take this point of, it's not just about the music, but it could be if you're, if you're looking and saying like, man, I wish that we had some music. Um, you, you possibly could be the music. And it's just something to think about. [00:29:47] Tony Arsenal: Yeah, I'll say this. Uh, it's not that hard to play guitar, but Jesse is actually quite a talented guitar player, so even though he's right, it's not that difficult. Uh, Jesse is, uh, is much better than he's letting on. But yeah, I mean, most modern worship songs, um, you can get by, you might have to like find a version online of it in this key, and you might not be able to sing it in this key, but like GC, D and E Minor. Yeah, that's right. We'll get you, we will get you basically every major worship song that you're used to singing. And those are all very easy chords to play. Yes. Um, there are difficult chords and some, some worship songs are more difficult or the, the tone is more difficult. Um, but even, even something like that, or get a keyboard and just do, you know, you can just pluck out notes, right? You can write on the notes what the, what the name of the notes are and just pluck out notes so people can sing with it. Um, there are lots of ways you can do, get a kazoo. You could lead music, you could lead your, that's your family in worship with a kazoo, um, or get the Trinity Salter hymnal app. Like, it's, yes, there are many ways that you could incorporate music in your family devotions and your personal devotions that, um, are not that challenging and, uh, really do add a lot. Now, I know there are some, there are probably a few people in our, our listening audience that are acapella only people. And I respect that perspective and, and I understand where it comes from. But, um, even then, like this might also be a little bit of a hot take. I'm not an excellent singer. I'm not a terrible singer, but, um, I could be a better singer if I practiced a little bit. And with the, with the ease of finding things like YouTube vocal coaches and right, just like vocal lessons and techniques and practice. Cool. Like, you could very easily improve your ability to sing and your confidence to sing, right? And that's only gonna help you to lead your family. I'll even throw this in there. Um. I'm in a congregation with lots and lots and lots of young families. There are five pregnant couples in our church right now. Wow. And our church, our church is probably only about 70 people on an average Sunday. So five pregnant, uh, couples is a pretty high percentage. Um, what I will tell you is that when the congregation is singing, we have lots of men who sing and they sing loud. But when the children are looking around at who is singing, they're not looking at the women, they're looking at the men. Right. Um, and you know, we're not, we are not like a hyper-masculinity podcast. We're not, you know, this isn't Michael Foster's show, this isn't the Art of Manhood. Um, but we've been pretty consistent. Like, men lead the way. That's the way the Bible has, that's way God's created it. And that's the way the Bible teaches it. And if you're in the church. You are commanded to sing. It's not an option. [00:32:28] The Importance of Singing in Church [00:32:28] Tony Arsenal: But what I will tell you is that, um, singing loud and singing confidently and singing clearly and helping the congregation to sing by being able to project your voice and sing competently, uh, it does a lot for your church. Yes. So it's never gonna be the wrong decision to improve your ability to sing and your confidence to sing. So I think that's great. I think the whole thing is great. You can learn to sing by listening to Shane and Shane and singing with them, and you can Yes. Invest a little bit of time and maybe a little bit of money in, in like an online vocal. I mean, you can get something like Musician or something like that that has guitar, but also you can do vocal training through that. There's lots of resources out there to do that. So yes, I guess that's the challenge this week. Like, let's all get out there and improve our singing voices a little bit and, and see if we can, can do this together. [00:33:14] Jesse Schwamb: I love it. I, I don't wanna belabor the points. [00:33:16] Encouragement to Learn Musical Instruments [00:33:16] Jesse Schwamb: I only bring it up because there might be somebody out there that's thinking, you know, I'd like to do more of that. And I say to you, well, why not you? It's okay. Like you could just go and explore and try get or borrow a relatively inexpensive guitar. And like you said, you don't need to learn to read music to do that. You're just kind of learning some shapes and they correspond to certain letters in the alphabet. And in no time at all, you could be the person that's strumming out, eking out some chords and you're doing that at home. And that might be a great blessing. It might change your life. It might change the trajectory of how you serve in the church. And you might find that God has equipped you to do those things. Yeah. And wouldn't it be lovely just to try some of those things out? So whatever, whatever they are, it's certainly worth trying and, and music is a big part of, I know like your life. Mine and it is someday. Tony, we have to do the sing episode. I don't know that we've actually done that one, right? We just talk about what it like, is it a command that we sing and why I think we've [00:34:08] Tony Arsenal: done that. I think we did have, we, it's early on in the episode on our views. Might have changed a little bit. So we maybe should um, we should loop back to, I'm sure we talked about 'em when we were going through Colossians as well. [00:34:17] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah, I think we did. I just dunno if we did, like, we're, we're just gonna set a whole hour aside and for us, that's definitely not an hour, but, and just talk about this in particular and like what, why do we sing and what, why does guy command this? And then why our voice is different and why do some people feel this, you know, sense of like why don't have a good voice and you know, we, you always hear people say like, well make a joyful noise. And I think sometimes that falls flax. You're kinda like, yeah, but you don't know the noise I'm making you. That's kind of the response you hear. So some someday we'll come back to it, but I'm gonna make a prophetic announcement that there is no way we're going get through this one parable. No already. So. [00:34:55] Introduction to the Parable of the Lost Sheep [00:34:55] Jesse Schwamb: Everybody strap in because we'll do probably a part one. And if you're curious about where we're going, we're moving just away from Matthew for now, we're gonna be hanging out in Luke 15. We've got a trio of parables about lost things. And again, I think this is gonna be very common to many people. So I encourage you as best you can, as we read these to always start our conversation, try to strip away what you've heard before and let's just listen to the scripture. [00:35:20] Reading and Analyzing the Parable [00:35:20] Jesse Schwamb: So we're gonna start in Luke chapter 15 in verse one. I'm not even gonna give you the name of the parable because you will quickly discern which one it is. So this is the Luke chapter 15, beginning of verse one. Now all the tax collectors and the sinners were coming near Jesus to listen to him, and both the Pharisees and the scribes were grumbling saying, this man receives sinners and eats with them. So he told them this parable saying. What man among you, if he has 100 sheep and has lost one of them, does not leave the 99 in the open pasture and go after the one which is lost until he finds it. And when he is found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors saying to them, rejoice with me for I found my lost sheep. I tell you that in the same way, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repentance than over 99 righteous persons who need no repentance. [00:36:19] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. And yeah, this, this will definitely be a multi-part episode. And, and part of that is we just spent a half an hour talking about affirmations and denials. I think we probably should have a podcast called Belaboring The Point, which is just us talking about other random stuff. Fair. [00:36:33] Comparing the Parable in Luke and Matthew [00:36:33] Tony Arsenal: But, um, the other part is that this parable is, um, slightly different in Luke as it is in Matthew. [00:36:41] Jesse Schwamb: Yes. [00:36:41] Tony Arsenal: Um, and also it's positioning in the narrative and what comes immediately following it is different. And I think that's worth unpacking a little bit as we talk about it this week, next week and, and probably maybe even into a third week. Um, but the, the parable here on, on one level, like most parables is super, super straightforward, right? Like right. This is God's di, this is God's demeanor, and his disposition is that he seeks that which is lost, um, which is good news for us because all of us are lost. There's only lost people until God finds them. Right. Um, and find again, of course, is an accommodated way of saying it's not like God has to go out searching for us. He knows where we are and he knows how to find us. Um. But this is also a different format for a parable, right? He's, he's not saying the kingdom of heaven is like this. The parable is what man of you having a hundred sheep? Like the parable is a question Yes. Posed to the audience, and it, it is in the context here, and this is where, this is where looking at the parallels between different, different gospels and how it's presented and even the different variations here shows you, on one level it shows you that Jesus taught these parables in multiple different contexts and different occasions. Right? In this occasion, it's he's sitting down, he's with the tax collectors and the sinners. They're grumbling. They're saying, this man eats with sinners. And receives them in, um, in Matthew, it's slightly different, right? He's in a different context and sit in a different teaching context. So the way that we understand that is that Christ taught these parables multiple places. And so we should pay attention to the variation, not just because there's variation for variation's sake, but the way that they're positioned tells us something. So when he's telling the account in Luke, it's told as a corrective to the tax collectors and the um. Right on the Pharisees, um, who are, sorry. It's a, it's a corrective to the Pharisees and the scribes who are grumbling about the tax collectors and the sinners drawing near to Christ. And so he speaks to the Pharisees and to the scribes and is like, well, which one of you wouldn't go seek out their lost sheep? Like, it's this question that just lays bare. They're really sinful. Ridiculous Jonah. I just invented that. Like Jonah I perspective that like, oh, exactly how dare God go after how dare Christ eat with sinners and tax collectors? And he says, well, if you love something. If you love your sheep, you're going to go after your sheep. [00:39:03] The Deeper Meaning of the Parable [00:39:03] Tony Arsenal: You're not going to just abandon, uh, this sheep to its own devices, even though there is, and again, this is a, a comedy way of talking about like, even though there's some risk associated with going after the one sheep, because you do have to leave the 99, he still is saying like, this is the character. This is my character speaking as grace. This is my character. This is the character of my father. And there's this implication of like, and it's obviously not the character of you. So I think this is a, this is a really great parable to sort of highlight that feature of parables when they're repeated across different, um, gospels. We have to pay attention, not just to the words of the parables themselves, but what the teaching is in response to what the teaching like proceeds. We'll see when we look at Matthew, there's a very, there's a, a different. Flavor to the parable because of what he's going to be leading into in the teaching. So I love this stuff. This has been such a great series to sort of like work through this because you, you really start to get these fine details. [00:39:59] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah. This parable of the lost sheep is I think on the face straightforward, like you said. But it is actually complex. It's complex in the argumentation and the posturing Jesus takes here, like you said, he's binding the pharisee. This is condemning question of like which one of you, like you said. So there's that, which is slightly different element than we've seen or covered so far. There's also the context, like you said, in which it happens and I think we need to think specifically about. Who is this lost? Who are the 99? Who are the ones that Jesus is really trying to draw in with conviction, but also, again, what is he saying about himself? And it's way more, of course, like we're gonna say, well, this is again, that default, that heart posture. Even those things are more cliche than we mean them to be. Yeah. And we need to spend some time, I think, on all of these elements. And it starts with, at least in Luke, we get this really lovely context about when the teaching unfolds. And even that is worth just setting down some roots for for just a second. Because what I find interesting here is I think there's a principle at play that we see where. Everything that everything gives. Jesus glory, all the things give him glory, even when his enemies come before him and seek to label him. It's not as if Jesus appropriates that label, repurposes, it turns it for good. The very label, the things that they try to do to discredit him, to essentially disparage him, are the very things that make him who he is and show his loving and kindness to his people. And I think we'll come back to this like this, this sheep this, these are his children. So these words that it starts with, that were evidently spoken with surprise and scorn, certainly not with pleasure and admiration. These ignorant guides of the Jews could not understand a religious preacher having anything to do with what they perceive to be wicked people. Yeah. And yet their words worked for good. I mean, this is exactly like the theology of the cross. The very saying, which was meant for reproach, was adopted by Jesus as a true description of his ministry. It is true. He's the one who comes and sits and subs and communes and touches the sinners, the ugly, the unclean, the pariahs. It led to his speaking three of these particular parables in Luke in rapid succession. For him to emphasize that he's taken all of what was literally true that the scribes of Pharisees said, and to emphasize that he is indeed the one who received sinners. It's not like he's just like saying, well, lemme put that on and wear that as a badge. He's saying. You do not understand God if you think that God does not receive sinners, to pardon them, to sanctify them, to make them fit for heaven. It's his special office to do so. And this, I think therein lies this really dip deep and rich beauty of the gospel, that that's the end that he truly came into the world. [00:42:47] Christ's Joy in Finding the Lost [00:42:47] Jesse Schwamb: He came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance. He came to the world to safe sinners, what he was upon Earth. He's now at the right hand of God and will be for all eternity. And he's emphatically the sinner's friend. And without this reproach from the Pharisees, like we don't get this particular teaching and what they intended again, to be used to really discredit God, to say, look, how can this be the son of God? What we get then for all of eternity is some understanding of Christ. And even here now with his word, we have this sense like, listen, do we feel bad? Do we feel wicked and guilty and deserving of God's wrath? Is there some remembrance of our past lives, the bitterness of sin to us? Is there some kind of recollection of our conduct for which we're ashamed? Then we are the very people who ought to apply to Christ. And Christ demonstrates that here, that his love is an act of love. Just as we are pleading nothing good of our own and making no useless delay, we come because of this teaching to Christ and will receive graciously his part in freely. He gives us eternal life. He's the one who sinners. I'm so thankful for this parable because it sets up very clearly who Jesus is, and this is where we can say he is for us. So let us not be lost for lack of applying to him that we may be saved. This text gives us the direct inroad to apply for that kind of healing and favor of God. [00:44:08] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. And, and I love, um, there is such a, um, subtle sort of SmackDown that Jesus does. Like, yeah. I, I think, um, just speaking on a purely human level for a second, like Jesus is such a master re tion. Like he is so handy and capable to just dismantle and smack down people who, and I obviously, I don't mean that in like a sinful way. Like he just puts down the argument. He just gets it done with, and even the way this is phrased, right, they come, they're grumbling, this man receives sinners and meets with them. So he told them this par ball, what, what man of you having a hundred sheep, if he lost one of them, doesn't leave the 99 in the open country and go after the one that is lost, right? So he's saying like, he jumps in right away, like. This is just the obvious answer. This is just the obvious state, like who would not go after their sheep. I think we hear this, and again, I'm not an expert on like first century sheep herding practices, right? But like we think of it, I look at it, I'm like, actually, like that seems like a really bad investment. Like it would be really bad idea to go after the one sheep and leave your 99 in the open country. That seems like a silly answer. That's my error. That's me being wrong because he's saying that as the obvious answer. Right? I think we sometimes, um, I've heard, I've heard sermons that preach this, that make it almost like this is a super reckless. You know, abandonment. Like he's so enamored with us that he leaves the 99 and he goes after the one, and he's taking such a huge risk. But the way that this is presented, this is the obvious thing that anyone in their right mind would do if they lost a sheet. Right? For sure. Right? It's not an unusual response. Yes. There's an element of risk to that, and I think that's, that's part of the parable, right? There's a, there's a riskiness that he's adding to it because, um. Again, we wanna be careful how we say this. Um, God's love is not reckless in the sense that we would normally think about reckless, but it's reckless in the sense that it, it es assumes sort of ordinary conventions of safety. Right? Right. That's not really what's at play here. Like the, the fact is Christ presents the scenario where you, you go after one lost sheep and leave your 99 in the open country or in Matthew, it's on the mountains. Like that's the normal expected course here, such that if you are the person who won't do that, then you are the one that's out of the ordinary. But then he goes on to say, and this is where, where I think he's just such a master, he's such a master at setting a logical trap. Here he says, um. And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors saying to them, rejoice with me for I have found my sheep that was lost. And again, this is the expected answer. This is not some unusual situation where like people are like, oh man, he like, he had a party 'cause he found a sheep. That's strange. This is what, what would be expected, right? This would be the normal response. But then he says, just so I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over 99 righteous persons who need no repentance. He is able, in the course of like. 30 words, like this is a short, short response. He's able to show them that their response to, to sinners is totally out of the ordinary. Like it's a, it's sort of an insane response. Um, he positions going after the one sheep and leaving the 99 as the sane response and leaving the, you know, leaving the one to be lost, leaving the sinners and tax collectors to be lost. That's the insane response. Right. That's the one that like, nobody would do that though. Why would anybody do that? But then he goes to show like, but that's exactly what you're doing. [00:47:55] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah. Right. And he [00:47:56] Tony Arsenal: says, what you should be doing is rejoicing with me for, I found my lost, she. Right. He shifts. He shifts. He's now the man in the parable saying, um, not just, uh, not just rejoice or not just I'm rejoicing, but he's summoning them to rejoice with him over the salvation of these lost sinners. And that is the normal expected response. And then he, he shows like there will be this rejoicing in heaven when a sinner repents more so than if there was a, but, and we should address this too. He's not saying that there is a such thing as a righteous person who needs no repentance. Right? He's saying like, even if there were 99 righteous people who need to know repentance, even if that was somehow the case, there would be more joy. There is more joy, there will be more joy over the sinner who repents than over a hun 99 people who didn't need to be saved. Right? He makes the sin, the, the, um, Pharisees and the scribes look like total chumps and totally like. Totally self-absorbed and turned inwards on themselves in this tiny little master stroke that you wouldn't even, you wouldn't even think that that was part of the point. If it wasn't for the fact that it was positioned right after verse 15, one and two. You just wouldn't get that from this parable. That there is this sort of like rhetorical SmackDown going on that I think is, is important for us to, to latch onto a little bit here. [00:49:18] Jesse Schwamb: Uh, why is our podcast not three hours? Because there's so much I want to say, so. I'm totally with you. I like what you brought up about this recklessness of God, and I'm with you. We shouldn't define that in the same way. Maybe we can modify it. I might say like His love is recklessly spend thrift. That is, we see when Paul says like God has lavished his love on us, like these big verbs that they are real. Yeah. It's not just hyper rip hyperbole or just like flowery language. And I think as you're speaking, what really occurred to me, what really kind of came through with what you're saying is, okay, what is this cost? Why is he so particular to go after this one? And I think it's because it's, he's looking for his sheep. So these are his children. Yes. It's not just, I think Christ is out in the world because he will find his children. He will find the one who is. His own. So he is looking for his own sheep. One of his, one of his fold. So like the sheep I might find in the world is the one that God has been seeking to save, even one of whom knows his name. That's like John 10, right? So one of, I think our problem is understanding this parable has to do with the when of our salvation. You know, we generally think it's at the time that, you know, we believe. The people are those given to God before the foundation of the world. And God sees us as his people before we were ever born, even before the world began. And when we believe it is just our Lord finding us as his last sheep and we're returned to the fold. So he always goes after that one. So we'll learn more. Like you said, when we look at Matthew's account about who are those other 90 nines. So we can set that aside, I suppose, for now. But it really is a matter of our status before Adam, before the fall, and then after Adam, after the fall, while all men fell with Adam. So also did God's people, which he had chosen before time began. And so this idea of going after the one is bringing back into the fold that who is his child though, who he has made a promise, a covenantal promise to bring into the kingdom of heaven. I was thinking as well of this amazing quote and like, what that all means about God's love for us, which again, is just more than like, isn't it nice that when you are out in

Richter, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Campus & Karriere

In dieser Podcastfolge begrüße ich Christoph Wieser – einen der engagiertesten jungen Tennistrainer im Raum Landshut, der in den letzten Jahren eine beeindruckend starke Position im lokalen Tennismarkt aufgebaut hat. Gemeinsam sprechen wir über seinen Werdegang, seine frühen Erfahrungen als Trainer und darüber, wie er es geschafft hat, sich schon in jungen Jahren mit einem hochmotivierten und dynamischen Team erfolgreich zu etablieren. Christoph gibt exklusive Einblicke in seine Trainingsphilosophie, seine Vision für die kommenden Jahre und die Art und Weise, wie er seine Tennisschule in der Region Landshut nachhaltig weiterentwickeln möchte. Außerdem nimmt er uns mit zu einem echten Herzensprojekt seiner Trainerlaufbahn: dem Aufbau einer eigenen Traglufthalle, um Kindern, Jugendlichen und seinen Vereinsmitgliedern einen ganzjährigen Trainingsbetrieb zu ermöglichen – ein ambitioniertes Projekt, das zeigt, wie viel Herzblut und Innovationskraft in seiner Arbeit steckt. Freu dich auf ein inspirierendes Gespräch voller Praxiswissen, Zukunftsideen und einer starken Botschaft für die Entwicklung des Tennissports in Deutschland.

Wie führt man ein fast 100 Jahre altes Bauunternehmen in die Zukunft – zwischen Fachkräftemangel, Digitalisierung und Bürokratie? In dieser Folge sprechen wir mit Christoph Wilkending und Sabrina Gerlof vom Baugeschäft Wolf aus Hildesheim. Christoph erzählt, wie er als klassischer Maurer angefangen hat, über die Meisterschule zum Unternehmer wurde und schließlich Verantwortung für ein gewachsenes Team übernommen hat. Sabrina bringt die Perspektive aus IT, Konzern- und Start-up-Welt mit und zeigt, wie viel frischer Wind von außen ins Handwerk kommen kann. Gemeinsam nehmt ihr mit, wie sich ein traditioneller Betrieb von unter zehn auf rund 40 Mitarbeitende entwickelt, welche Baustellen dadurch im Büro entstehen und warum digitale Prozesse, saubere Buchhaltung und klare Kommunikation plötzlich überlebenswichtig werden. Es geht um Ausbildung, Nachwuchsgewinnung und den Ruf des Handwerks, um den Besuch von Ministerpräsident Olaf Lies auf der Baustelle und die Frage, was Politik wirklich besser machen könnte. Außerdem sprechen wir über Megatrends wie BIM und digitale Zwillinge, darüber, was davon schon Alltag ist und was noch Zukunftsvision bleibt – und werfen einen Blick nach vorne auf das Jubiläum: 100 Jahre Baugeschäft Wolf in Hildesheim.

Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Interviews

Wegen schwindender Fachkräfte können Schulen ihrer Funktion oft nicht mehr gerecht werden. Bildungssoziologe Aladin El-Mafaalani schlägt vor, Rentnerinnen und Renter als Mentoren an Schulen einzusetzen. Man könne nicht auf ihre Expertise verzichten. Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Interviews

Das drängendste Thema im Koalitionsausschuss an diesem Donnerstag wird das Rentenpaket sein. Für die Ökonomin Veronika Grimm geht die Reform in die falsche Richtung. Die Ausgaben seien zu hoch. Sie würde eher am Renteneintrittsalter schrauben. Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Interviews

Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Informationen am Morgen

Gubbel, Gubbel, Gubbel...so oder so ähnlich hört sich (oder liest sich) der Laut eines Truthahns an. Es ist Thanksgiving Week. Ein großes Fest in den USA und ein Football-Feiertag weltweit. Gefüllter Truthahn mit Pumpkin oder Apple Sauce als Beilage steht am Donnerstag auf jedem Tisch in den Staaten. Bei uns kommen vier Partien auf den Speiseplan. Denn in dieser Folge blicken wir auf die wichtigsten Storylines und Matchups der Thanksgiving Spiele. Für wen ist die Partie Packers at Lions richtungsweisender und kann Green Bay Jahmyr Gibbs (erneut) stoppen? In welcher Verfassung werden die Chiefs und die Cowboys im direkten Duell sein (vielleicht mal konstant über vier Viertel)? Geht die Aufholjagd der AFC North Divisionleader Baltimore auch gegen die Bengals mit dem zurückkehrenden Joe Burrow weiter und wieso läuft Lamar eigentlich so wenig? Außerdem schauen wir auf das NFC Top Duell beim Black Friday Game. All diese Spiele gibt es live auf DAZN. Dankbar sind wir auch ob der ganzen Playoff-Konstellationen. Deshalb überlegen wir uns - mit Hilfe genauester Berechnungen von Christoph (der junge Albert Einstein) und durch Unterstützung des inneren Gefühls von Flo zur aktuellen Form der Teams - welche Franchises könnten noch in die Playoffs kommen, die aktuell auf KEINEM Postseason-Spot stehen und wer müsste dafür Platz machen? Realistisch oder nicht, die Glaskugel hat gesprochen und eins können wir festhalten: Das letzte Drittel der NFL regular season wird richtig spannend. Lasst euch diese Ausgabe und den Truthahn schmecken. Happy Thanksgiving!

Die Kessler-Zwillinge Alice und Ellen sind gestorben. Den Zeitpunkt ihres Todes haben sie selbst bestimmt: Den 17. November 2025. Eine von ihnen war Medienberichten zufolge krank, eine nicht. Dennoch entschieden sie sich dafür, den letzten Weg gemeinsam zu gehen. Ein trauriger Anlass, um sich mal wieder an ein wichtiges Thema zu erinnern: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat 2020 unmissverständlich festgestellt, dass das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht auch ein Recht auf selbstbestimmtes Sterben umfasst, dessen Wahrnehmung als autonomer Akt von Staat und Gesellschaft zu respektieren ist. Dieses Recht schließt die Freiheit ein, sich das Leben zu nehmen und hierbei auf die freiwillige Hilfe Dritter zurückzugreifen. Der Gesetzgeber könnte seither regulieren und Kriterien festlegen, um Missbrauch zu verhindern, tat es aber bislang nicht. In jüngster Zeit sind in den Medien wieder Stimmen zu vernehmen, die eine Strafbarkeit fordern – obwohl Karlsruhe gesprochen hat! Es ist also Zeit, sich das Thema mal genauer anzuschauen. Natürlich kommt dafür nur Prof. Dr. Christoph Knauer, Vorsitzender des BRAK-Ausschusses StPO in Betracht. Er war derjenige, der das Thema mit seinem Kollegen Prof. Dr. Hans Kudlich vor das BVerfG gebracht und letztlich dafür gesorgt hat, dass §217 StGB für verfassungswidrig und nichtig erklärt wird. Christoph erklärt die aktuelle Rechtslage, schildert Restrisiken für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, offen gebliebene Rechtsfragen und erklärt, welche Regelungen dringend gebraucht werden, um Sterbehilfevereinen Rahmenbedingungen für eine Freitodbegleitung vorzugeben. Die fehlen nämlich bislang und werden von den Vereinen selbst aufgestellt. Für uns bleibt am Ende eigentlich nur die Frage offen: Warum respektiert die Politik nicht endlich die Entscheidung aus Karlsruhe und handelt?

Reimann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Corso

Der Institutsdirektor berichtet darüber, wofür das Haus der Barmherzigkeit steht, das neue Kinderpflegedomizil Fridolina und über die Wichtigkeit von Spenden und Testamentsspenden.

Sterz, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, @mediasres

Hallo und herzlich willkommen zur neuesten Folge unseres Podcasts Humulus Lupulus – heute mit einem alten Bekannten: Sebastian Dreier von der VERMATECH GmbH ist zum zweiten Mal bei uns zu Gast. Nachdem die erste Folge mit ihm so viele von euch interessiert hat, haben wir einfach nochmal nachgemessen. Und das im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes! Es geht tief rein in die Welt der digitalen Vermessung – mit Roverstab, Totalstation und Drohne im Gepäck. Sebastian erklärt, warum moderne Bauvermessung mehr ist als nur Technik, wie man ein wachsendes Team führt, ohne alles selbst machen zu wollen, und weshalb auch die gute alte Büroorganisation ein Schlüssel zum Erfolg ist. Dazu gibt's den einen oder anderen persönlichen Einblick – ganz im Stil unseres Podcasts. Prost – und jetzt viel Spaß beim Zuhören. Wünschen euch Markus und Christoph.

Dittrich, Christoph www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Fazit

Sterz, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, @mediasres

In dieser Folge ist Hermann Simon zu Gast – Gründer von Simon-Kucher & Partners, international anerkannter Managementdenker und Autor des neuen Buchs „Simon sagt: Was im Management wirklich zählt“. Gemeinsam mit Christoph geht es um die fundamentalen Prinzipien moderner Unternehmensführung, Innovationskraft, Preissetzung und Kundenzentrierung.In dieser Folge:Warum Führung mehr ist als FachkompetenzWas Hidden Champions auszeichnet – und warum Mittelständler oft schneller und besser sindWie Unternehmen in Deutschland agiler und entscheidungsfreudiger werden könnenDer richtige Umgang mit Pricing: Wert vor PreisKreativität messen und verkaufen – so funktioniert esWarum Kundennähe Innovationsmotor Nr. 1 istDas große Potenzial von hybriden Preismodellen und PreistestsBuch von Hermann Simon:Simon sagt – Was im Management wirklich zählt (Spiegel-Bestseller)Mehr Infos:www.simon-kucher.com_______________________

Dr. Kati Ernst, erfolgreiche Seriengründerin (u.a. ooia), hat ein ambitioniertes Ziel: Sie möchte 110 Jahre alt werden. Auslöser für ihre Beschäftigung mit Longevity war eine persönliche Gesundheitskrise, die sie dazu brachte, ihren Lebensstil radikal zu ändern und über 20 Kilo Fett abzubauen. Im Gespräch mit Christoph Burseg erklärt sie, dass es dabei nicht um ewiges Leben, sondern um die Maximierung der gesunden „Healthspan“ geht. Sie zeigt auf, warum 90 % des Erfolgs auf einfachen Lifestyle-Entscheidungen im Hier und Jetzt basieren, wie man extreme Trends einordnet und welche Rolle KI sowie „digitale Zwillinge“ künftig für unsere Gesundheit spielen werden. In dieser Episode erfährst du: - Warum Longevity nicht nur das Leben verlängern soll, sondern vor allem die gesunde Lebenszeit (Healthspan) maximiert. - Welche einfache „50-Prozent-Regel“ bei jeder Mahlzeit hilft, ohne Kalorienzählen gesund zu bleiben. - Warum Krafttraining und eine Proteinaufnahme von ca. 1,6 Gramm pro Kilo Körpergewicht essenziell für das Alter sind. - Wieso Schlaf für die Gehirngesundheit (glymphatisches System) entscheidend ist und wie er Alzheimer vorbeugen kann. - Weshalb extreme Protokolle wie die von Bryan Johnson („Don't Die“) der Wissenschaft helfen, auch wenn sie für den Alltag kaum tauglich sind. - Welche Rolle KI und der „Digitale Zwilling“ in der Zukunft der Medizin spielen werden, um Behandlungen vorab virtuell zu testen. - Warum soziale Interaktion – selbst beim Burger-Essen – einen positiven Effekt auf die Langlebigkeit haben kann. Christoph auf LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/christophburseg Kontaktiere uns über Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/vodafonebusinessde/

In this episode of the US Navy History Podcast, Dale and Christoph delve into the gripping story of the USS Atik, an American Q-ship during World War II. On the night of March 27, 1942, the Atik was engaged in a deceptive mission to lure German U-boats near the Virginia coast. This episode explores the encounter between the Atik and the German submarine U-123, commanded by Captain Lieutenant Reinhard Hardegen. Despite Atik's courageous efforts, the engagement revealed the outdated nature of Q-ships in modern submarine warfare. The hosts also discuss the broader implications of the encounter, including how it influenced naval strategy and technology. The episode concludes with a tribute to Captain Lance P. Sijan, a Medal of Honor recipient who demonstrated extraordinary heroism during the Vietnam War.

"Angels of Bread": Neue Erinnerungen von Patti Smith / "Achte Woche": Antonia Baum schreibt über eine Frau, die vor der Frage steht: Will ich mein Kind behalten oder nicht? /

Möller, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Corso

Kurz und bündig, interessant und informativ. Aber auch tröstlich und gelegentlich anstößig. Bunt wie das Leben sollen auch die Formen der christlichen Botschaft im Sender sein. Von Christoph Hartmann.

Die Medien-Woche Ausgabe 318 vom 22. November 2025 Mit Christian Meier. Zu Gast ist in dieser Ausgabe Christoph Schwennicke, Politikchef und Mitglied der Chefredaktion von T-Online. https://www.t-online.de/author/id_91971224/christoph-schwennicke.html Wir sprechen in dieser Ausgabe über folgende Themen: 1 Erst Verleger, dann Politiker: Was ist dran am Interessenkonflikt von Kulturstaatsminister Wolfram Weimer? / 2 In Berlin suchen Deutschland und Frankreich nach digitaler Souveränität / 3 Wie steht es um den Politikjournalismus? SHOWNOTES https://apollo-news.net/abendessen-mit-ministern-fuer-80-000-euro-wolfram-weimers-unternehmen-verkauft-einfluss-auf-politische-entscheidungstraeger/ https://weimermedia.de/ https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/weimer-firma-anteile-100.html https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article6920568baa438e0ccb7babd1/wolfram-weimer-warnt-vor-zusammenbruch-des-freien-mediensystems.html https://www.zeit.de/2025/49/ludwig-erhard-gipfel-wolfram-weimer-media-group-sponsoren https://www.welt.de/kultur/stuetzen-der-gesellschaft/plus691eb4be800234221d23c190/im-weimer-wie-aus-einer-tegernseer-petitesse-eine-unnoetige-krise-wird.html * https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/digitale-souveraenitaet-2394250 https://netzpolitik.org/2025/gipfel-zur-europaeischen-digitalen-souveraenitaet-kehrtwende-fuer-die-innovationsfuehrerschaft/ https://leibniz-hbi.de/hbi-news/gipfeltreffen-europa-will-digital-souveraener-werden/ https://www.heise.de/news/Europaeischer-Digitalgipfel-Volle-Kraft-voraus-fuer-KI-11083615.html https://www.diepresse.com/20321702/kein-cyberangriff-cloudflare-sorgte-selbst-fuer-weltweiten-ausfall * https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/kolumne-christoph-schwennicke/id_101006182/afd-und-bsw-in-der-krise-populistische-strategien-am-ende-.html * https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/ich-will-keine-fische-fangen-100.html --- Impressum:Diensteanbieter Stefan Winterbauer/Christian Meier Medien-Woche Schwiebusser Str. 44 10965 Berlin E-Mail-Adresse: diemedienwoche@gmail.com Stefan Winterbauer Christian Meier Links auf fremde Webseiten: Die Inhalte fremder Webseiten, auf die wir direkt oder indirekt verweisen, liegen außerhalb unseres Verantwortungsbereiches und wir machen sie uns nicht zu Eigen. Für alle Inhalte und Nachteile, die aus der Nutzung der in den verlinkten Webseiten aufrufbaren Informationen entstehen, übernehmen wir keine Verantwortung. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Erstellt mit kostenlosem Datenschutz-Generator.de von Dr. Thomas Schwenke⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ KontaktmöglichkeitenInhaltlich verantwortlich:Haftungs- und Schutzrechtshinweise Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ich berichte von einer Führung beim Rettungshubschrauber Christoph 17, bei der ein Notarzt spannende Einblicke gab. Außerdem erzähle ich vom GIFF-Event 2025 und warum der Apple Support offenbar nicht googeln kann.

Berlin hat bei der COP30 eine Milliarde Euro zum Schutz des Regenwalds zugesagt. Kein Grund, sich auf die Schultern zu klopfen, sagt Grünen-Chef Felix Banaszak. Deutschland stehe klimapolitisch auf der Bremse - zulasten der eigenen Glaubwürdigkeit. Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Interviews

Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Interviews

Christoph and Bree got into a little belated spooky challenge because every day is Halloween at ExtraNormal!!

Dr. Christoph Sorg is  a social scientist at the Humboldt University of Berlin. He researches theories of capitalism and post-capitalism and the new debate on economic planning in times of digitalization and the climate crisis.During the interview we spoke about his work around understanding economic planning and his recent publication Finance as a form of economic planning. His work shows how even in the free market capitalism we live in today, there is actually a significant amount of planning, it's just that the planning is for facilitating capitalist economies, the neoliberal paradox.As the co-founder of projects like Bread Cooperative where we are trying to build out apps that facilitate post-capitalist economic relations, I think it's important for us to properly understand the current state of capitalism so that we know the kind of meaningful interventions we could make.  This episode is sponsored by NYM, the world's most private VPN. Unlike traditional VPNs, Nym uses a decentralized mixnet to scramble your internet data — hiding who you're talking to, when, and how often. You can switch between full mixnet mode for maximum anonymity, or a faster VPN mode for everyday use.Use the code blockchainsocialist when signing up and get an extra month!If you liked the podcast be sure to give it a review on your preferred podcast platform. If you find content like this important consider donating to my Patreon starting at just $3 per month. It takes quite a lot of my time and resources so any amount helps. Follow me on Twitter (@TBSocialist) or Mastodon (@theblockchainsocialist@social.coop) and join the r/CryptoLeftists subreddit.Support the showICYMI I've written a book about, no surprise, blockchains through a left political framework! The title is Blockchain Radicals: How Capitalism Ruined Crypto and How to Fix It and is being published through Repeater Books, the publishing house started by Mark Fisher who's work influenced me a lot in my thinking. The book is officially published and you use this linktree to find where you can purchase the book based on your region / country.

Um ataque com um guarda-chuva envenenado deixou Christoph Bulwin à beira da morte. Seu corpo sucumbiu lentamente a uma toxina quase indetectável. E até hoje, sua morte permanece um mistério inquietante. Quem assassinou o Christoph? E por que? ❤ Torne-se um apoiador pelo Apoia.se ou pela Orelo❤ Segue a gente no ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠ Pesquisa e roteiro: Marcela Souza Edição: Alexandre LimaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Butterwegge, Christoph www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Politisches Feuilleton

Herbstreuth, Mike www.deutschlandfunk.de, Corso

In der neuen Folge des SHOCK2 Podcast plaudern Michael und Christoph ausführlich über Forestrike, den frischen Taktik-Action-Mix, der gerade bei Devolver Digital für Nintendo Switch und PC erschienen ist. Die beiden sprechen über Gameplay, Stil, Stärken und Schwächen – und natürlich darüber, ob sich der Titel für euch im prall gefüllten Spieleherbst wirklich auszahlt. Wir wünschen euch viel Spaß beim Hören und freuen uns auch dieses Mal besonders auf euren Input, Ideen & Feedback im Forum. Review bei SHOCK2: https://mag.shock2.info/review-forestrike/

Sterz, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, @mediasres

Viele Männer verharren in alten Rollenbildern. Bundeswehr, Polizei und konservative Parteien zeigen tief verankerte patriarchale Strukturen. Männlichkeitsforscher May fordert Männer auf, ihre Privilegien zu reflektieren und Gleichstellung zu fördern. May, Christoph www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Studio 9

Grieß, Thielko www.deutschlandfunk.de, Interviews

Vor bald vier Jahren begann die russische Großinvasion in der Ukraine. Das Land steht erneut vor einem harten Winter, während Luftangriffe häufig auf die Energiezufuhr zielen. In Deutschland wird kontrovers diskutiert, was die "Zeitenwende" bedeutet. Heinemann, Christoph www.deutschlandfunk.de, Kontrovers

Thema: Geplanter Reformkurs in Schulen

Imagine watching a movie where the main character turns, looks right at you and asks what to do next. That's the future of entertainment that AI engineer Christoph Lassner envisions, featuring interactive, AI-powered stories that you don't just watch but also help create. He unpacks what this could mean for storytelling, imagining a world in which creators use generative AI to set the scene — and then let viewers take control of the rest.Interested in learning more about upcoming TED events? Follow these links:TEDNext: ted.com/futureyou Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.