Podcasts about The Young Pope

In the weeks since Pope Francis's passing, the internet has been flooded by papal memes, election analysis, and even close readings of the newly appointed Pope Leo XIV's own posts. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz consider why the moment has so captivated Catholics and nonbelievers alike. They discuss the online response and hear from the writer Paul Elie, who's been covering the event on the ground at the Vatican for The New Yorker. Then the hosts consider how recent cultural offerings, from last year's “Conclave” to the HBO series “The Young Pope,” depict the power and pageantry of the Church, with varying degrees of reverence. Leo XIV's first address as Pope began with a message of peace—an act that may have contributed to the flurry of interest and excitement around him. “The signs are hopeful,” Cunningham says. “And reasons to hope attract attention.”Read, watch, and listen with the critics:“Francis, the TV Pope, Takes His Final Journey,” by Vinson Cunningham (The New Yorker)“White smoke, Black pope?,” by Nate Tinner Williams (The National Catholic Reporter)“The First American Pope,” by Paul Elie (The New Yorker)“Brideshead Revisited,” by Evelyn Waugh“Conclave” (2024)“Angels & Demons” (2009)“The Young Pope” (2016)“The Two Popes” (2019)Pope Leo XIII's “Rerum Novarum”New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Dean Richards, entertainment reporter for WGN, joins Bob Sirott to provide the latest news in entertainment. Bob and Dean talk about the rising popularity of the TV series “The Young Pope” and what late night hosts had to say about the new pope being from Chicago. They also share details about the American Country Music Awards, […]

While waiting for news from the real-life conclave, the editors re-watch the 2024 feature film Conclave and the 2017 HBO series The Young Pope. Then they air their hopes and anxieties about the papal election. Dan Hitchens and special guest Matthew Schmitz join Julia Yost.

While waiting for news from the real-life conclave, the editors re-watch the 2024 feature film Conclave and the 2017 HBO series The Young Pope. Then they air their hopes and anxieties about the papal election. Dan Hitchens and special guest Matthew Schmitz join Julia Yost.

Holy smoke. A Canadian Catholic tells us what it was like to stand with thousands in St Peter's Square when the white smoke billowed -- and waited to hear the first words of the first American Pope.Well, the first except for the pretend American Pope, chosen by university students in Chicago recently, in a re-creation of the Conclave of 1492. The history prof behind it explains the powerful lesson in that exercise. And: the Young Pope. We hear from a childhood friend of the boy known as Robert Prevost -- long before he became Pope Leo the Fourteenth. It's kind of a big deal. The UK becomes the first country to hammer out a new trade agreement with the White House. An expert in business diplomacy tells us it won't be so easy for Canada.  Getting his message across. The sister of a murder victim used artificial intelligence to generate a victim impact statement from her late brother. She tells us she believes he would have offered his killer the forgiveness she can't.  The bleat goes on. Sheep are still by far the dominant population in New Zealand -- but a new count reveals that humans are closing the gap. Slowly, and slightly. As It Happens, the Thursday edition. Radio that puts people behind baa-ers.

The Papal Conclave starts tomorrow, and between popular media like “Conclave” and “The Young Pope” garnering tons of attention, and misconceptions around power hungry Cardinals vying for the top spot in the Catholic Church, Joe breaks down what we can expect from the upcoming Conclave, and how other REAL Popes felt when they took office. Transcript: Joe: Welcome back to Shameless Popery. I’m Joe Heschmeyer and the conclave. To elect a new pope to succeed, Pope Francis begins tomorrow. Now, recent history is any guide. We’re probably going to have a new pope ...

Send us a textThe papal conclave beginning May 7th faces various threats including political influences and spiritual challenges, requiring worldwide prayer for the 124 cardinal electors during this sacred process.• Catholics can "adopt" a cardinal to pray for through adoptacardinal.org• Vatican preparations include three white cassocks in different sizes for the new Pope.• The Cardinals and any staff took an oath of secrecy for the conclave proceedings.• A previous participant described feeling the "palpable presence of the Holy Spirit" during the conclave.• Speculation centers on Asian candidates like Cardinal Tagle from the Philippines.• The next pope may choose the name Paul VII or John XXIV rather than Francis II.• The conclave may last 2-3 days, likely concluding by Friday or Saturday. Although Deacon Mike firmly believes it will be faster.SPONSOR:   Briefcase MarketingAt Briefcase Marketing, we create marketing that inspires action and delivers results.  We will:Clarify your message to attract the right audience.Streamline your website to convert more visitors into customers, donors or volunteers.Create consistency to build trust and deepen relationships across every marketing platform (Emails, Ads, Social Media, Etc).Check out just two of their  successful clients and their most recent client, Womankind.WomankindTheology of the Body CLESt. John Cantius ParishFr Damian invites you:Jubilee Year pilgrimages will happen across the Diocese of Cleveland: June 12th at St. John of the Cross to Lourdes Shrine. July 19th at St. John Bosco to Shrine of the Queen of the Holy Rosary at Incarnate Word Academy (especially for young adults), July 26th at St. Anne Shrine (focused on grandparents and families).Readings for the 4th Sunday of Easter

Dopo la morte di papa Francesco siamo corsi a vedere Conclave di Edward Berger, basato sul romanzo omonimo di Robert Harris, con Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, Isabella Rossellini, Sergio Castellitto e John “Albus Silente” Lithgow. Il podcast della sede vacante torna ancora una volta con Stefano Cocci e senza Simone Zizzari racconta il film di Edward Berger pluricandidato agli Oscar 2025. Inoltre, raccontiamo due prodotti “di chiesa”: Habemus Papam di Nanni Moretti e The Young Pope di Paolo Sorrentino. Buon ascolto. TIMESTAMP[00:00] Buongiorno, buon pomeriggio e buonasera [1:22] Conclave[10:18] Sergio Castellitto e il cast [13:26] Habemus Papam [14:40] The Young Pope

Costa-Gavras estrena a sus 92 años 'El último suspiro' y Javier Ocaña aprovecha para hacer un repaso por la extensísima trayectoria del director franco-griego. Repasamos también las películas y series claves sobre la muerte del papa y el cónclave para elegir al próximo, desde 'Cónclave' hasta 'Las sandalias del pescador' pasando por 'Los dos papas' o 'The Young Pope'. Además, el profesor Ocaña responde a la crítica bajo demanda de '¿Quién puede matar a un niño?', el clásico español de terror dirigido por Chicho Ibáñez Serrador.

Who will be the next Pope? Today we take a look at what God has told His Prophets concerning a new Pope soon to take the stage. Pastor Stan also shares some interesting facts about the Antichrist and what the difference is going to be between the False Prophet and the Antichrist. 00:00 – Intro 02:29 – Call to Kill Christians 10:36 – Seven Year Tribulation 11:49 – Prophecies about the Antichrist 18:55 – I Saw the Tribulation 22:18 – Difference Between False Prophet & Antichrist 25:19 – Mark of the Beast Chip 26:43 – Our Sponsors

Who will be the next Pope? Today we take a look at what God has told His Prophets concerning a new Pope soon to take the stage. Pastor Stan also shares some interesting facts about the Antichrist and what the difference is going to be between the False Prophet and the Antichrist. 00:00 – Intro 02:29 – Call to Kill Christians 10:36 – Seven Year Tribulation 11:49 – Prophecies about the Antichrist 18:55 – I Saw the Tribulation 22:18 – Difference Between False Prophet & Antichrist 25:19 – Mark of the Beast Chip 26:43 – Our Sponsors

Si parla di cosa abbiamo registrato e cosa registreremo, della vita in oratorio, del film "il Sospetto", della serie Young Pope, dell'ultima intervista di De Luigi, di come proteggere i figli piccoli e di tanto altro.Sostieni questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-valley-live--5686515/support.Live su Youtube: https://youtu.be/px7vSwe4VZoSegui le LIVE su Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/spacevalleyDal Lunedì al Giovedì alle ore 9:00!Shop Ufficiale Space Valley: https://spacevalley.shop/Canale Yakety-Yak: https://www.youtube.com/@YaketyYakSpace Valley: https://www.youtube.com/@vallespazialeInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/vallespazialeTelegram: https://t.me/vallespazialeAround the Valley: https://www.youtube.com/AroundtheValley

Wester Wuori shares his reaction to HBO's The Young Pope and The New Pope.

Puntata a cura di Jacopo Bulgarini d'Elci e Francesca Sarah Toich. Tutti i Papi di Sorrentino: in questa puntata retrospettiva del podcast, discutiamo di The Young Pope (2016) e The New Pope (2020), create e dirette da Paolo Sorrentino (disponibili su Sky e NOW). Parliamo di una serie (o meglio di due serie consecutive) del tutto eccezionali nel contesto della produzione televisiva italiana. Sontuose, stilisticamente formidabili, capaci di affrontare temi giganteschi: come quello dello scandalo del sacro, della dimensione spirituale in un mondo secolarizzato, del dialogo e conflitto tra ragione e fede. E con due protagonisti straordinari, e diversamente pop, come Jude Law e John Malkovich - entrambi alle prese con le trame del fantastico Silvio Orlando. “Nuovi classici”: il podcast a due voci di Mondoserie su show che diventano fenomeni immediati.Leggi il nostro articolo su The Young Pope: https://www.mondoserie.it/the-young-pope/Leggi il nostro articolo su The New Pope: https://www.mondoserie.it/the-new-pope/ MUSICA: Fluidscape di Kevin MacLeod è un brano concesso in uso tramite licenza Creative CommonsAttribuzione 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Fonte: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100393 Artista: http://incompetech.com/Parte del progetto: https://www.mondoserie.it/Iscriviti al podcast sulla tua piattaforma preferita o su: https://www.spreaker.com/show/mondoserie-podcast Collegati a MONDOSERIE sui social: https://www.facebook.com/mondoseriehttps://www.instagram.com/mondoserie.it/ https://twitter.com/mondoserie_it https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwXpMjWOcPbFwdit0QJNnXQ https://www.linkedin.com/in/mondoserie/

A young sex worker visits the apartment of an old sex worker, who is engaging the young man for his professional services. The old guy cooks a meal for the young fellow, while asserting that things were harder for gays back in the day. The young chap is unconvinced.Gary Lamb directs Daamen Krall and Michael Fletcher.Collin Smith is the playwright. He has written for television (Man-babies) and film(TIME:The Kallef Browder Story). He is also an actor. (Person of Interest, The Young Pope, As the World Turns, more).During June (Pride Month), Open-Door Playhouse will include in itsprogramming plays that focus on the stories of LGBTQ characters.Founded by playwright and filmmaker Bernadette Armstrong, Open-Door Playhouse is a Theater Podcast- like the radio dramas of the 1940s and 1950s. The Playhouse launched on September 15, 2020. At the time, Open-Door Playhouse provided Playwrights, Actors and Directors a creative outlet during the shutdown. Since its inception. Open-Door Playhouse has presented Short and One-Act plays from Playwrights across the country and internationally. In 2021 Open-Door Playhouse received a Communicator Award for Content for the Play Custody and in 2023 the play What's Prison Like was nominated for a Webby Award in the Crime & Justice Category. Plays are produced by Bernadette Armstrong, Sound Engineer is David Peters, soundeffects are provided by Audio Jungle, and music from Karaoke Version. All plays are recorded at The Oak House Studio in Altadena, CA. There's no paywall at the Open-Door Playhouse site, so you could listen to everything for free. Open-Door Playhouse is a 501c3 non-profit organization, and if you would like to support performances of works by new and emerging playwrights, your donation will be gratefully accepted. Your tax-deductible donations help keep our plays on the Podcast Stage. We strive to bring our listeners thoughtful and surprising one-act plays and ten-minute shorts that showcase insightful and new perspectives of the world we share with others. To listen or to donate (or both), go to  https://opendoorplayhouse.orgSupport the Show.

Dopo il successo di La Grande Bellezza come miglior film straniero agli Oscar, Paolo Sorrentino è riconosciuto come uno dei più grandi registi italiani attuali. Paolo Rotondo, direttore artistico del Cinema Italiano Festival, dialoga con Federico Magrin sull'arte e i personaggi del regista napoletano. In questo episodio di I viandanti della cultura, il discorso attraversa il rapporto di Sorrentino con l'attore Toni Servillo, la centralità della vita nel film autobiografico È stata la mano di Dio, il ritratto dei politici Giulio Andreotti e Silvio Berlusconi, la fotografia di Napoli e Roma. Federico e Paolo scovano il ruolo centrale che hanno la maschera attoriale e la spiritualità in Sorrentino, a partire da un film esistenziale come Le conseguenze dell'amore fino alla serie The Young Pope. Ringraziamo gli sponsor di questo episodio: il MAECI, Ministero Affari Esteri e Cooperazione Internazionale https://www.esteri.it/it/  e la Società Dante Alighieri di Auckland www.dante.org.nz 

Simone Coco, esperto di fama mondiale dei VFX, gli effetti visivi del cinema e della televisione, ci ha raccontato la sua vita e i suoi successi Dietro la buona riuscita di un film ci sono molte maestranze, dei veri e propri talenti che spesso vengono sottovalutati. È il caso di Simone Coco, cagliaritano che collabora con la Walt Disney Company come supervisore dei VFX, ossia degli effetti speciali visivi. Lo abbiamo intervistato in merito ai suoi successi, tra cui spiccano senza dubbio le due nomination agli Oscar 2024 per “Mission Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One” e per “Napoleon”. Di quest'ultimo, ho personalmente apprezzato molto la resa scenica della battaglia di Austerlitz. Durante la sua intervista, Coco ci ha raccontato la sua storia professionale, svelandoci i dietro le quinte di questo settore. Ci ha anche dato dei consigli per i giovani che vogliono approcciarsi a questo mondo. Qui la manualità, la creatività e la tecnologia servono per creare dei risultati sorprendenti e realistici. Insomma, è un mondo in cui si concretizzano i sogni degli spettatori con immagini sempre più ricche e precise. Simone Coco ha lasciato la Sardegna nel 2002 per andare a Londra a imparare la lingua. Dopo un periodo in Spagna, è tornato in Gran Bretagna e ha frequentato un corso di specializzazione sul compositing agli Escape Studios di Londra, un'accademia sugli effetti visivi. Subito dopo ha lavorato alla società di post-produzione Rushes per tre anni. In seguito, ha aperto con alcuni colleghi il dipartimento tv alla Dneg, dove ha trascorso sei anni. Dal 2019 è alla ILM, l'Industrial Lights and Magic, prima parte della Lucasfilm e ora parte della Walt Disney Company. Ha collaborato anche con Paolo Sorrentino, con cui ha realizzato le acclamate serie tv “The Young Pope” e “The New Pope” e il film in due parti “Loro”.

This is OPLA! Our limited-run series One Piece live action podcast series. Each week we bring you interviews with some of the talented individuals behind Netflix's One Piece! This season, we talk to the actors who brought the characters from Eiichiro Oda's One Piece to life. Each week we talk to these amazingly talented individuals from across the world, and peer into what it was like to step into their role. Interview This week, we have Alexander Maniatis, the actor who plays the butler Klahadore (a/k/a the villain Kuro). Mr. Maniatis is a prolific actor, playing rolls in Love, Lies and Hybrids, Asseblief & Dankie, Warrior, The Young Pope and more. In addition to his acting, Alexander also works as a voice artist and musician (vocals, piano and guitar). His new track FREAK drops soon!

This is OPLA! Our limited-run series One Piece live action podcast series. Each week we bring you interviews with some of the talented individuals behind Netflix's One Piece! This season, we talk to the actors who brought the characters from Eiichiro Oda's One Piece to life. Each week we talk to these amazingly talented individuals from across the world, and peer into what it was like to step into their role. Interview This week, we have Alexander Maniatis, the actor who plays the butler Klahadore (a/k/a the villain Kuro). Mr. Maniatis is a prolific actor, playing rolls in Love, Lies and Hybrids, Asseblief & Dankie, Warrior, The Young Pope and more. In addition to his acting, Alexander also works as a voice artist and musician (vocals, piano and guitar). His new track FREAK drops soon! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Check out this incredible interview T-Quest & DJ ILL NINO had with Recording Artist Young Pope! They talked about his career, his music and so much more. You can stream Young's music on all digital platforms & make sure you follow him on Instagram @RealYoungPope Follow us on all social media @TheTQuestShow @TQuestGLM @DJILLNINO download the T-Quest mobile app in your google play store & your app store. On the app you can hear Gotta Love Me Radio as well as WQRN RnB Radio 24/7 & check out our website www.GottaLoveMeWorld.com.  For bookings email TQuestGLM@gmail.com

Houston Reggaetón singer, Young Pope, joins the show ahead of his new single “Tocar a Ti”. Pope talks being a trailblazer for the Houston reggaetón scene, developing his Pope persona, being in the midst of the Latin music wave and more!

Prendendo spunto dalla presentazione alla Berlinale 2024 di Another End di Piero Messina, parliamo della luce del cinema “desolante e puramente cinematografico” del suo maestro, Paolo Sorrentino. Nella sezione delle notizie parliamo del ritorno al cinema di Lupin III - Il Castello di Cagliostro, di un post su Instagram del direttore della Mostra del Cinema e della pubblicazione del libro Godard 70.Qui l'indice della puntata: 00:25. News. Aggiornamenti sulla seconda stagione di questo podcast01:41. News. Torna la cinema (per pochi giorni, anzi pochissimi) il primo film di animazione di Hayao Miyazaki, Lupin III - Il Castello di Cagliostro. 03:01. News. Parliamo di un post apparso su Instagram del direttore della Mostra del Cinema, Albero Barbera, a seguito della fine del suo giro presso gli studios delle major hollywoodiane per capire quali film potrebbero arrivare al Lido a settembre. Qualcosa, però, nelle parole del direttore non ci convince e gli rivolgiamo alcune domande.06:03. News. È uscito in libreria il libro Godard 70 di Fabio Alcantara edito da Cinemaotgrafo.it. Un libro sugli anni video del regista francese: vi spieghiamo qualcosa in più.08:33 La Luce del Cinema di Paolo Sorrentino. Film analizzati: L'uomo in più; Le conseguenze dell'amore; L'amico di famiglia; Il Divo; This Must Be The Place; La grande bellezza; Youth - La giovinezza; Loro; È stata la mano di Dio più le serie tv The Young Pope e The New Pope. 37:10. Il prossimo film diretto da Christopher Nolan sarà un horror?

The international tour takes us to Rome for Paolo Sorrentino's bizarre HBO dual miniseries, The Young Pope and The New Pope. On the surface it's the tale of Jude Law as a sexy but conservative American pope and John Malkovich as his more liberal British successor, but in reality it's one of the strangest shows to air on American television.

Tune in as Young Pope interviews w/ TampaMystic on The Hype 87.3

Mit 47 Jahren ist Lenny Belardo frisch zum Papst gewählt. Aber im Vatikan kann sich niemand so recht erklären, wie das passieren konnte. Die politischen Strippenzieher wissen zu wenig über den jungen Amerikaner, als dass sie sich Kontrolle über ihn erhoffen könnten. Und auch seine Führungslinie ist alles andere als bekannt. Ohnehin ist das Mysterium, das Unbekannte, das zentrale Thema in Sorrentinos erster Serie. Wir sprechen über alle zehn Folgen, betrachten also die Serie im Ganzen, und beackern die zum Motiv erhobene Selbstwidersprüchlichkeit von The Young Pope eher thematisch, nicht chronologisch. Ihr hört FilMic Podcast, viel Spaß.

This week, we watched The Singing Forest, a movie that we have a lot of theories and questions about. Questions like, "why?" and "wait, what?!" IMDb calls it "The worst LGBT movie ever," are they right? Let's find out! Topics discussed: The Young Pope is younger than other popes Reincarnation Chris tries to remember the name of the movie Deadfall for a while You don't have to be crazy to work here, but it helps We Read Movies This podcast is hosted by ZenCast.fm

Titus & Sebastian Edoardo di Giovanni talk about The Young Pope, Paolo Sorrentino's HBO comic miniseries about a reactionary American pope calling the modern world to account before the mystery of God!

From August 11, 2020: Academy Award-nominated Actor James Cromwell visited the show for a chat about his movie Emperor.JAMES CROMWELL BIOJames Cromwell earned an Academy Award nomination for his performance as Farmer Hoggett in the international smash BABE, and reprised his role in the hit sequel, BABE: PIG IN THE CITY. In 2018, he appeared notably in the Steven Spielberg/Universal blockbuster JURASSIC WORLD: ANCIENT FUTURES. He recently appeared opposite Meryl Streep in THE LAUNDROMAT for Steven Soderbergh, and will be seen in the period drama EMPEROR alongside Bruce Dern and Ben Robson. Cromwell appeared in THE PROMISE alongside Oscar Isaac and Christian Bale, and in MARSHALL alongside Chadwick Boseman and Sterling K. Brown, with other films including the Academy Award-winning THE ARTIST football dramedy THE LONGEST YARD opposite Adam Sandler, I, ROBOT alongside Will Smith, Oscar-nominated features THE GREEN MILE (Frank Darabont), THE QUEEN (Stephen rears), SECRETARIAT (Gary Ross), SPIDERMAN III (Sam Raimi), and LA CONFIDENTIAL (Curtis Hanson) among many others. Cromwell starred in STILL MINE opposite Genevieve Bujold (Toronto Film Festival Premiere / Top Ten Canadian Films of 2012), winning the Best Actor Award at the 2013 Canadian Film Awards, a Genie Award, and the Best Actor Award at the Seattle International Film Festival for his performance.Cromwell won a 2013 Emmy Award for his turn opposite Jessica Lange and Lily Rabe on American Horror Story: Asylum. He currently recurs on HBO's Succession opposite Brian Cox, was just seen in two very different season-long arcs concurrently: on Epix's Berlin Station opposite Richard Jenkins and on Starz' Counterpart opposite J K Simmons. He earlier starred opposite Lee Pace on AMC's Halt & Catch Fire, in HBO miniseries The Young Pope opposite Jude Law and Diane Keaton, and continues his recurring role in the TBS comedy The Detour playing Jason Jones' mysterious, wily father-in-law. He played erudite defense attorney Warren Daniels on the TNT/Steven Bochco series Murder in the First, Andrew Mellon on HBO's Boardwalk Empire, starred on the ABC series Betrayal as billionaire industrialist Thatcher Karsten, and appeared on the Fox series 24 as Jack Bauer's father Phillip Bauer. He earned multiple Emmy Award nominations for his work on the HBO original series Six Feet Under, the HBO movie RKO 281, and the NBC drama ER. His body of work encompasses dozens of miniseries and MOWs, including TNT's A Slight Case of Murder, HBO's Angels in America, West Wing, Picket Fences, Home Improvement, L.A. Law, and Star Trek: The Next Generation.Born in Los Angeles, Cromwell grew up in New York and Waterford, Connecticut, and studied at Carnegie Mellon University (then Carnegie Tech). His father, John Cromwell, an acclaimed actor and director, was one of the first presidents of the Screen Directors Guild. His mother, Kay Johnson, was a stage and film actress.

Puntata a cura di Jacopo Bulgarini d'Elci e Francesca Sarah Toich.Tutti i Papi di Sorrentino: in questa puntata retrospettiva del podcast, discutiamo di The Young Pope (2016) e The New Pope (2020), create e dirette da Paolo Sorrentino (disponibili su Sky e NOW). Parliamo di una serie, o meglio di due serie consecutive, del tutto eccezionali nel contesto della produzione televisiva italiana. Sontuose, stilisticamente formidabili, capaci di affrontare temi giganteschi: come quello dello scandalo del sacro, della dimensione spirituale in un mondo secolarizzato, del dialogo e conflitto tra ragione e fede. E con due protagonisti straordinari, e diversamente pop, come Jude Law e John Malkovich - entrambi alle prese con le trame del fantastico Silvio Orlando.“2 voci, 1 serie”: dialoghi sulle cose che ci piacciono, o ci interessano, nel podcast di Mondoserie.Leggi l'articolo su The Young Pope: https://www.mondoserie.it/the-young-pope/ Leggi l'articolo su The New Pope: https://www.mondoserie.it/the-new-pope/ MUSICA nella puntata: Fluidscape di Kevin MacLeod, brano concesso in uso tramite licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Fonte: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100393Artista: http://incompetech.com/Parte del progetto: https://www.mondoserie.it/Iscriviti al podcast sulla tua piattaforma preferita: https://www.spreaker.com/show/mondoserie-podcastCollegati a MONDOSERIE sui social:https://www.facebook.com/mondoseriehttps://www.instagram.com/mondoserie.it/https://twitter.com/mondoserie_ithttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwXpMjWOcPbFwdit0QJNnXQhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/mondoserie/

Es ist sicher nicht übertrieben, wenn man konstatiert, dass die Forschung zur christlichen und insbesondere katholischen Literatur eingeschlafen ist. Überblickt man die literaturwissenschaftliche Forschungsgeschichte der letzten Jahrzehnte, so fällt auf, dass es kaum großangelegte Versuche gibt, die Spezifik von katholischer Literatur zu benennen. Diese internationale literatur- und medienwissenschaftliche Tagung stellt die Frage nach der katholischen Literatur und ihren Medien heute neu: Wo finden sich christliche/katholische Spuren in der Gegenwartsliteratur bis zum Aufkommen des Trends des neuen Geheimnisvollen, von Serien wie The Young Pope bis zum Magiediskurs in Game of Thrones? Was passiert, wenn man den Renouveau catholique zwar historisch fasst und untersucht, aber seine Überlegungen auch auf das 21. Jahrhundert projiziert? Prof. Dr. Claudia Stockinger ist Professorin für Neuere deutsche Literatur, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/hoerbahn/message

Es ist sicher nicht übertrieben, wenn man konstatiert, dass die Forschung zur christlichen und insbesondere katholischen Literatur eingeschlafen ist. Überblickt man die literaturwissenschaftliche Forschungsgeschichte der letzten Jahrzehnte, so fällt auf, dass es kaum großangelegte Versuche gibt, die Spezifik von katholischer Literatur zu benennen. Diese internationale literatur- und medienwissenschaftliche Tagung stellt die Frage nach der katholischen Literatur und ihren Medien heute neu: Wo finden sich christliche/katholische Spuren in der Gegenwartsliteratur bis zum Aufkommen des Trends des neuen Geheimnisvollen, von Serien wie The Young Pope bis zum Magiediskurs in Game of Thrones? Was passiert, wenn man den Renouveau catholique zwar historisch fasst und untersucht, aber seine Überlegungen auch auf das 21. Jahrhundert projiziert? Prof. Dr. Jan-Heiner Tück ist Professor für Dogmatik und Dogmengeschichte, Universität Wien --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/hoerbahn/message

Julian Fellowes wastes no time dropping bombs in Belgravia as Anne decides to spill the beans to Lady Brockenhurst. How will she take the news? Who is Charles Pope? Is Anne going to hell? The LoG investigate! To support the LoG on Patreon visit: https://www.patreon.com/lordsofgrantham To buy LoG Merchandise visit: https://www.teepublic.com/user/lords-of-grantham-podcast  

On this episode of The Story & Craft Podcast, we sit down with actor, Sebastian Roché. He has had a long and successful career on screen. He's been featured on TV in shows like 24, Fringe, The Vampire Diaries, The Young Pope and The Man in The High Castle. Now, Sebastian can be seen in Taylor Sheridan's latest show on Paramount+, 1923. We chat about his career, his unique upbringing and what it was like to work alongside Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren in 1923. It was a great chat and a pleasure to bring you Sebastian Roché's story.

Una Splendida Cornice - Rai 3 (19/01/23) --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/vito-rodolfo-albano7/message

Afrikát öltöztető újságíró, apácák közé surranó szerzetes, divat mint adatközlő, karnevál mint rendszerkritika. Ebben az adásban a divat és a film köti össze a szereplők között feszülő évszázadokat: az Osztrák-Magyar Monarchiától jutunk el az infleuncerek koráig, közben pedig kitérünk rá, hogy a médiabohóckodás fejdísze épp úgy megnyomoríthat valakit, mint egy valódi korona. Habár a Fűző nekiront a hamis Sissi-feldolgozásoknak, hasra esik a mítoszrombolás közben. A Fantomszálban egy mániákus szabót követünk, miközben a film a ruhatervező lelkét vetkőzteti. A Szépleányok az egyetlen magyar szocialista szépségversenyről szól, hogy a beszélgetés egy pontján a Playboy is bekopogtasson Kádár Jánoshoz. Végül A szomorúság háromszöge mesél róla, hogy aki a hierarchiával játszik, annak betonbiztos a pozíciója. Tartsatok velünk! Ez itt a Semmi kóla, a Partizán kultúrtörténeti podcastje.Kövessétek a Semmi kólát az Instagramon!https://www.instagram.com/semmikolapodcast/Ha az adással kapcsolatban bármiféle észrevételetek van, írjatok bátran a semmikolapodcast@gmail.com címre.Hosszan tárgyalt filmekA szomorúság háromszöge (The Triangle of Sadness, 2022)Fantomszál (Phantom Thread, 2017)Fűző (Corsage, 2022)Szépleányok (1987)Röviden említett filmek és sorozatokA négyzet (The Square, 2017)Az ifjú pápa (The Young Pope, 2016)Lavina (Turist, 2014)Ne nézz fel! (Don't Look Up, 2021)Spencer (2021)Felhasznált irodalomMihail Mihajlovics Bahtyin: François Rabelais művészete, a középkor és a reneszánsz népi kultúrája (2002)Rudolf Broby-Johansen: Az öltözködés története (1969)F. Dózsa Katalin: Megbámulni és megbámultatni. Viselettörténeti tanulmányok (2014)Divat, egyén, társadalom. Szerkesztette: F. Dózsa Katalin, Szatmári Judit Anna, Vér Eszter Virág (2016)Holiness and Masculinity. in the Middle Ages. Szerkesztette: P. H. Cullum, Katherine J. LewisKlaniczay Gábor: A civilizáció peremén. Kultúrtörténeti tanulmányok (1990)Cikkek, egyebekInterjú Hartai Lászlóval, a Szépleányok társrendezőjével (artportal, 2019)Kolozsi Ádám: 30 éve ölte meg magát a 16 éves magyar szépségkirálynő (Index, 2016)Konkrét: Molnár Csilla halála és az 1985-ös szépségkirálynő-választás (Klubrádió, 2019)Simon István: Kettős mérce – Az erotika befektetési előnyei a szocializmusban (archiv.net, 2005)

Netflix’s TUDUM event is the latest ultra-announcement-fest. Lightning round: what looked TU-GOOD and TU-DUMB? Plus, a Star Wars revelation and a full-length trailer for The Last of Us. All that and more on Cordkillers! This week on It’s Spoilerin’ Time: Star Trek: Lower Decks (305), Rick and Morty (604), She-Hulk (106)Next week: Star Trek: Lower … Continue reading Cordkillers 424 – The Young Pope King →

Netflix’s TUDUM event is the latest ultra-announcement-fest. Lightning round: what looked TU-GOOD and TU-DUMB? Plus, a Star Wars revelation and a full-length trailer for The Last of Us. All that and more on Cordkillers! This week on It’s Spoilerin’ Time: Star Trek: Lower Decks (305), Rick and Morty (604), She-Hulk (106)Next week: Star Trek: Lower … Continue reading Cordkillers 424 – The Young Pope King →

Netflix’s TUDUM event is the latest ultra-announcement-fest. Lightning round: what looked TU-GOOD and TU-DUMB? Plus, a Star Wars revelation and a full-length trailer for The Last of Us. All that and more on Cordkillers! This week on It’s Spoilerin’ Time: Star Trek: Lower Decks (305), Rick and Morty (604), She-Hulk (106)Next week: Star Trek: Lower … Continue reading Cordkillers 424 – The Young Pope King →

Netflix’s TUDUM event is the latest ultra-announcement-fest. Lightning round: what looked TU-GOOD and TU-DUMB? Plus, a Star Wars revelation and a full-length trailer for The Last of Us. All that and more on Cordkillers! This week on It’s Spoilerin’ Time: Star Trek: Lower Decks (305), Rick and Morty (604), She-Hulk (106)Next week: Star Trek: Lower … Continue reading Cordkillers 424 – The Young Pope King →

In this episode of Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I'm continuing last week's discussion with Robin Hanson, professor of economics at George Mason University and author of the Overcoming Bias blog. His books include The Age of Em: Work, Love and Life when Robots Rule the Earth and The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life.(Be sure to check out last week's episode for the first part of my conversation with Robin. We discussed futurism, innovation, and economic growth over the very long run, among other topics. Definitely worth the listen!)In part two, Robin and I talk about the possibility of extraterrestrial life. Earlier this year, the US House of Representatives held a hearing on what Washington now calls "unexplained aerial phenomena." While the hearing didn't unveil high-def, close-up footage of little green men or flying saucers, it did signal that Washington is taking UAPs more seriously. But what if we really are being visited by extraterrestrials? What would contact with an advanced alien civilization mean for humanity? It's exactly the kind of out-there question Robin considers seriously and then applies rigorous, economic thinking. In This Episode:* The case for extraterrestrial life (1:34)* A model to explain UFOs (6:49)* Could aliens be domesticating us right now? (13:23)* Would advanced alien civilization renew our interest in progress? (17:01)* Is America on the verge of a pro-progress renaissance? (18:49)Below is an edited transcript of our conversation.The case for extraterrestrial lifeJames Pethokoukis: In the past few years there have been a lot of interesting developments on the UFO — now UAP — front. The government seems to be taking these sightings far more seriously. Navy pilots are testifying. What is your take on all this?Robin Hanson: There are two very different discussions and topics here. One topic is, “There are these weird sightings. What's with that? And could those be aliens?” Another more standard, conservative topic is just, “Here's this vast empty universe. Are there aliens out there? If so, where?” So that second topic is where I've recently done some work and where I feel most authoritative, although I'm happy to also talk about the other subject as well. But I think we should talk first about the more conservative subject.The more conservative subject, I think, is — and I probably have this maybe 50 percent correct — once civilizations progress far enough, they expand. When they expand, they change things. If there were a lot of these civilizations out there, we should be able to, at this point, detect the changes they've made. Either we've come so early that there aren't a lot of these kinds of civilizations out there … let me stop there and then you can begin to correct me.The key question is: it looks like we soon could go out expanding and we don't see limits to how far we could go. We could fill the universe. Yet, we look out and it's an empty universe. So there seems to be a conflict there.Where are the giant Dyson spheres?One explanation is, we are so rare that in the entire observable universe, we're the only ones. And therefore, that's why there's nobody else out there. That's not a crazy position, except for the fact that we're early. The median star will last five trillion years. We're here on our star after only five billion years, a factor of 1000. Our standard best theory of when advanced life like us should appear, if the universe would stay empty and wait for it, would be near the end of a long-lived planet. That's when it would be most likely to appear.There's this power of the number of hard steps, which we could go into, but basically, the chance of appearing should go as the power of this time. If there are, say, six hard steps, which is a middle estimate, then the chance of appearing 1000 times later would go as 1000 to the power of six. Which would be 10 to the 18th. We are just crazy early with respect to that analysis. There is a key assumption of the analysis, which is the universe would sit and wait empty until we showed up. The simplest way to resolve this is to deny that assumption is to say, “The universe is not sitting and waiting empty. In fact, it's filling up right now. And in a billion years or two, it'll be all full. And we had to show up before that deadline.” And then you might say, “If the universe is filling up right now, if right now the universe is half full of aliens, why don't we see any?”We should be detecting signals, seeing things. We have this brand new telescope out there sitting a million miles away.If we were sitting at a random place in the universe, that would be true. But we are the subject of a selection effect. Here's the key story: We have to be at a place where the aliens haven't gotten to yet. Because otherwise, they would be here instead of us. That's the key problem. If aliens expand at almost the speed of light, then you won't see them until they're almost here. And that means if you look backwards in our light cone — from our point, all the way backwards — almost all that light cone is excluded. Aliens couldn't be there because, again, if they had arisen there, they would be here now instead of us. The only places aliens could appear that we could see now would have to be just at the edge of that cone.Therefore, the key explanation is aliens are out there, but everywhere the aliens are not, we can't see them because the aliens are moving so fast we don't see them until they're almost there. So the day on the clock is the thing telling you aliens are out there right now. That might seem counterintuitive. “How's the clock supposed to tell me about aliens? Shouldn't I see pictures of weird guys with antennae?” Something, right? I'm saying, “No, it's the clock. The clock is telling you that they're out there.” Because the clock is saying you're crazy early, and the best explanation for why you're crazy early is that they're out there right now.But if we take a simple model of, they're arising in random places and random times, and we fit it to three key datums we know, we can actually get estimates for this basic model of aliens out there. It has the following key parameter estimates: They're expanding at, say, half the speed of light or faster; they appear roughly once per million galaxies, so pretty rare; and if we expanded out soon and meet them, we'd meet them in a billion years or so. The observable universe has a trillion galaxies in it. So once per million galaxies means there are a lot of them that will appear in our observable universe. But it's not like a few stars over. This is really rare. Once per million galaxies. We're not going to meet them soon. Again, in a billion years. So there's a long time to wait here.A model to explain UFOsBased on this answer, I don't think your answer to my first question is “We are making contact with alien intelligence.”This simple model predicts strongly that there's just no way that UFOs are aliens. If this were the only possible model, that would be my answer. But I have to pause and ask, “Can I change the model to make it more plausible?” I tried to do this exercise; I tried to say, “How could I most plausibly make a set of assumptions that would have as their implication UFOs are aliens and they're really here?”Is this a different model or are you just changing something key in that model?I'm going to change some things in this model, I'll have to change several things. I'm going to make some assumptions so that I get the implication that some UFOs are aliens and they're doing the weird things we see. And the key question is going to be, “How many assumptions do you have to make, and how unlikely are they?” This is the argument about the prior on this theory. Think of a murder trial. In a murder trial, somebody says A killed B. You know that the prior probability of that is like one in a million: One in 1000 people are killed in a murder and they each know 1000 people. The idea that any one of those people killed them would be one in a million. So you might say, “Let's just dismiss this murder trial, because the prior is so low.” But we don't do that. Why? Because it's actually possible in a typical murder trial to get concrete, physical evidence that overcomes a one-in-a-million prior. So the analogy for UFOs would be, people say they see weird stuff. They say you should maybe think that's aliens. The first question you have to ask is, how a priori unlikely is that? If it was one in 10 to the 20 unlikely, you'd say, “There's nothing you could tell me to make me believe this. I'm just not going to look, because it's just so crazy.”There are a lot of pretty crazy explanations that aren't as crazy as that.Exactly. But my guess is the prior is roughly one in a thousand. And with a one-in-thousand prior, you've got to look at the evidence. You don't just draw the conclusion on one in a thousand, because that's still low. But you've got to be willing to look at the evidence if it's one in a thousand. That's where I'd say we are.Then the question is, how do I get one in a thousand [odds]? I'm going to try to generate a scenario that is as plausible as possible and consistent with the key datums we have about UFOs. Here are the key datums. One is, the universe looks empty. Two is, they're here now. Three is, they didn't kill us. We're still alive. And four is, they didn't do the two obvious things they could do. They could have come right out and been really obvious and just slapped us on the face and said, “Here we are.” That would've been easy. Or they could have been completely invisible. And they didn't do either of those. What they do is hang out at the edge of visibility. What's with that? Why do that weird intermediate thing? We have to come up with a hypothesis that explains these things, because those are the things that are weird here.The first thing I need to do is correlate aliens and us in space-time. Because if it was once randomly per million galaxies, that doesn't work. The way to do that is panspermia. Panspermia siblings, in fact. That is, Earth life didn't start on Earth. It started somewhere else. And that somewhere else seeded our stellar nursery. Our star was born with a thousand other stars, all in one place at the same time, with lots of rocks flying back and forth. If life was seeded in that stellar nursery, it would've seeded not just our Earth, but seeded life on many of those other thousand stars. And then they would've drifted apart over the last four billion years. And now they're in a ring around the galaxy. The scenario would be one of those other planets developed advanced life before us.The way we get it is we assume panspermia happened. We assume there are siblings, and that one of them came to our level before us. If that happened, the average time duration would be maybe 100 million years. It wouldn't have happened in the last thousand years or even million years. It would be a long time. Given this, we have to say, “Okay, they reached our level of advancement a hundred million years ago. And they're in the same galaxy as us; they're not too far away. We know that they could find us. We can all find the rest of the stellar siblings by just the spectra. We all were in the same gas with the same mixture of chemicals. We just find the same mixture of chemicals, and we've found the siblings. They could look out and find our siblings.We have this next piece of data: The universe is empty. The galaxy is empty. They've been around for 100 million years, if they wanted to take over the galaxy, they could have. Easy, in 100 million years. But they didn't. To explain that, I think we have to postulate that they have some rule against expansion. They decided that they did not want to lose their community and central governance and allow their descendants to change and be strange and compete with them. They chose to keep their civilization local and, therefore, to ban or prohibit, effectively, any colonists from leaving. And we have to assume not only that was their plan, they succeeded … for 100 million years. That's really hard.They didn't allow their generation ships to come floating through our solar system.No, they did not allow any substantial colonization away from their home world for a hundred million years. That's quite a capability. They may have stagnated in many ways, but they have maintained order in this thing. Then they realize that they have siblings. They look out and they can see them. And now they have to realize we are at risk of breaking the rule. If they just let us evolve without any constraints, then we might well expand out. Their rule they maintain for a hundred million years to try to maintain their precious coherence, it would be for naught. Because we would violate it. We would become the competitors they didn't want.That creates an obvious motive for them to be here. A motive to allow an exception. Again, they haven't allowed pretty much any expansion. But they're going to travel thousands of light-years from there to here to allow an expedition here, which risks their rule. If this expedition goes rogue, the whole game is over. So we are important enough that they're going to allow this expedition here to come here to try to convince us not to break the rule. But not just to kill us, because they could have just killed us. Clearly, they feel enough of an affiliation or a sibling connection of some sort that they didn't just kill us. They want us to follow their rule, and that's why they're here. So that all makes sense.Could aliens be sort of “domesticating” us right now?But then we still have the last part to explain. How, exactly, do they expect to convince us? And how does hanging out at the edge of our visibility do that? You have to realize whoever from home sent out this expedition, they didn't trust this expedition very much. They had to keep them pretty constrained. So they had to prove some strategy early on that they thought would be pretty robust, that could plausibly work, that isn't going to allow these travelers to have much freedom to go break their rules. Very simple, clean strategy. What's that strategy? The idea is, pretty much all social animals we know have a status hierarchy. The way we humans domesticate other animals is … what we usually do is swap in and sit at the top of their status hierarchy. We are the top dog, the top horse, whatever it is. That's how we do it. That's a very robust way that animals have domesticated other animals. So that's their plan. They're going to be at the top of the status hierarchy. How do they do that? They just show up and be the most impressive. They just fly around and say, “Look at me. I'm better.”You don't need to land on the National Mall. You just need to go 20 times faster than our fastest jet. That says something right there.Once we're convinced they exist, we're damn impressed. In order to be at the top of our status hierarchy, they need to be impressive. But they also need to be here and relatively peaceful. If they were doing it from light-years away, then we'd be scared and threatened. They need to be here at the top of our status hierarchy, being very impressive. Now it would be very impressive, of course, if they landed on the White House lawn and started talking to us, too. But that's going to risk us not liking something. As you know, we humans have often disliked other humans for pretty minor things: just because they don't eat the kind of foods we do or marry the way we do or things like that.If they landed on the White House lawn, someone would say, “We need to plan for an invasion.”The risk is that if they told if they showed up and they told a lot about them, they gave us their whole history and videos of their home world and everything else, we're going to find something we hate. We might like nine things out of 10. But that one thing we hate, we're going to hate a lot. And unfortunately, humans are not very forgiving of that, right? Or most creatures. This is their fear scenario. If they showed too much, then game over. We're not going to defer to them as the top of our status hierarchy, because they're just going to be these weird aliens. They need to be here, but not show very much to us. The main thing they need to show is how impressive they are and that they're peaceful. And their agenda — but we can figure out the agenda. Just right now, we can see why they're here: because the universe is empty, so they didn't fill it; they must have a rule against that, and we'd be violating the rule. Ta-da. They can be patient. They're in no particular rush. They can wait for us to figure out what we believe or not. Because they just have to hang around and be there until we decide we believe it. And then everything else follows from that.As you were describing that, it reminded me of the television show, The Young Pope. We have a young Pope, and he starts off by not appearing because he thinks part of his power comes from an air of mystery and this mystique. In a way, what you're saying is that's what these aliens would be doing.Think of an ancient emperor. The ancient emperor was pretty weird. Typically, an emperor came from a whole different place and was a different ethnicity or something from the local people. How does an emperor in the ancient world get the local people to obey them? They don't show them a lot of personal details, of course. They just have a really impressive palace and impressive parades and an army. And then everybody goes, “I guess they're the top dog.” Right. And that's worked consistently through history.I like “top dog” better than apex predator, by the way.Would advanced alien civilization renew our interest in progress?I wrote about this, and the scenario I came up with is kind of what you just described: We know they're here, and we know they have advanced technology. But that's it. We don't meet them. I would like to think that we would find it really aspirational. That we would think, “Wow. We are nowhere near the end. We haven't figured it all out. We haven't solved all we need to know about physics or anything else.” What do you think of that idea? And what do you think would be the impact of that kind of scenario where they didn't give us their gadgets, we just know they're there and advanced. What does that do to us?All through history, humans haven't quite dared to think that they could rule their fate. They had gods above them who were more in control. It's only in the last few centuries where we've taken on ourselves this sense that we're in charge of ourselves and we get to decide our future. If real aliens show up and they really are much more powerful, then we have to revise that back to the older stance of, “Okay, there are gods. They have opinions, and I guess we should pay attention.” But if these are gods who once were us, that's a different kind of god. And that wasn't the ancient god. That's a different kind of god that we could then aspire to. We can say “These gods were once like us. We could become like them. And look how possible it is.”Now, of course, we will be suspicious of whether we can trust them and whether we should admire them. And that's where not saying very much will help. They just show up and they are just really powerful. They just don't tell us much. And they say, “We're going to let you guys work that out. You get the basics.” I think we would be inspired, but also deflated a bit that we aren't in charge of ourselves. If they have an agenda and it's contradicting ours, they're going to win. We lose. It's going to be pretty hard.Is America on the verge of a pro-progress renaissance?We've had this stagnation relative to what our expectations were in the immediate postwar decades. I would like to think I'm seeing some signs that maybe that's changing. Maybe our attitude is changing. Maybe we're getting to more of a pro-progress, progress-embracing phase of our existence. Maybe 50 years of this after 50 years of that.There are two distinctions here that are importantly different. One is the distinction between caution and risk. The other is between fear and hope. Unfortunately, it just seems that fear and hate are just much stronger motives for most humans than hope. We've had this caution, due to fear. I think the best hope for aggression or risk is also fear or hate. That is, if we can find a reason, say, “We don't want those Russians to win the war, and therefore we're going to do more innovation.” Or those people tell us we can't do it, and therefore you can. Many people recently have entered the labor force and then been motivated by, “Those people don't think we're good enough, and we're going to show we're good enough and what we can do.”If you're frightened enough about climate change, then at some point you'll think, “We need all of the above. If that's nuclear, that's fine. If it's digging super deep into the Earth…”If you could make strong enough fear. I fear that's just actually showing that people aren't really that afraid yet. If they were more afraid, they would be willing to go more for nuclear. But they're not actually very afraid. Back in 2003, I was part of this media scandal about the policy analysis market. Basically, we had these prediction markets that were going to make estimates about Middle Eastern geopolitical events. And people thought that was a terrible sort of thing to do. It didn't fit their ideals of how foreign policy estimates should be produced. And one of the things I concluded from that event was that they just weren't actually very scared of bad things happening in the Middle East. Because if so, they wouldn't have minded this, if this was really going to help them make those things go better.And we actually saw that in the pandemic. I don't think we ever got so scared in the pandemic that we did what we did in World War II. As you may know, in the beginning of World War II we were losing. We were losing badly, and we consistently were losing. And we got scared and we fired people and fired contractors and changed things until we stopped losing. And then we eventually won. We never fired anybody in the pandemic. Nobody lost their job. We never reorganized anything and said, “You guys are doing crap, and we're going to hand the job to this group.” We were never scared enough to do that. That's part of why it didn't go so well. The one thing that went well is when we said, “Let's set aside the usual rules and let you guys go for something.”We got scared of Sputnik and 10 years later there's an American flag on the Moon.Right. And that was quite an impressive spurt, initially driven by fear.Perhaps if we're scared enough of shortages or scared enough of climate change or scared enough that the Chinese are going to come up with a super weapon, then that would be a catalyst for a more dynamic, innovative America, maybe.I'm sorry for this to be a negative sign, but I think the best you can hope for optimism is that some sort of negative emotion would drive for more openness and more risk taking.Innovation is a fantastic free lunch, it seems like. And we don't seem to value it enough until we have to.For each one of us, it risks these changes. And we'd rather play it safe. You might know about development in the US. We have far too little housing in the US. The main reason we have far too little housing is we've empowered a lot of local individual critics to complain about various proposals. They basically pick just all sorts of little tiny things that could go wrong. And they say, “You have to fix this and fix that.” And that's what takes years. And that's why we don't have enough housing and building, because we empower those sorts of very safety-oriented, tiny, “if any little things go wrong, then you've got to deal with it” sort of thinking. We have to be scared enough of something else. Otherwise those fears dominate. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Enjoying the podcast? Please consider becoming a patron of the show's official Patreon: https://patreon.com/theseantcollins Gretchen and Sean reunite to discuss Pope Pius XIII's address to the College of Cardinals in Paolo Sorrentino's The Young Pope, with lengthy digressions about The Sopranos, Roman Catholicism, "Sexy and I Know It," and our own miserable religious upbringings along the way. (from The Young Pope Episode 5, written and directed by Paolo Sorrentino) Gretchen's Patreon: https://patreon.com/scumbelievable Gretchen's Twitter: https://twitter.com/scumbelievable Sean and Cut to Black's Patreon: https://patreon.com/theseantcollins Sean's twitter: https://twitter.com/theseantcollins

این قسمت راجع به رویاهاست. گزارش و تفسیر خواب یکی از بیمارهای یونگ رو بررسی میکنم. همچنین مراحل خواب و سرچشمه‌های خواب رو در نظریه‌های یونگ توضیح میدم.

In an effort to avoid false advertising, our team does have to confess that this episode has almost nothing to do with Avatar: The Last Airbender. This month we are bringing you our annual community update. Ben Clemmer and Caleb Meyer were joined in the studio by Storytelling Breakdown's newest hosts Stephen Stachofsky and Larissa Whitaker. We'll reflect on our last season, look ahead to some of what's coming up, and all four hosts discussed their year in media for 2021. We've got Babylon Berlin, Barbaren, Bo Burnham: Inside, Castlevania, CJ The X, D&D, Get Back, King of Staten Island, Marvel Phase 4, Mass Effect, Matthew Colville, Mike Birbiglia's Working It Out, Monster of the Week, Mythic Quest, No Time to Die, Overly Sarcastic Productions, Secret Base, Succession, Ted Lasso, Vincenzo, The Witcher and The Young Pope. We probably forgot to list a few things.The 2017 videogame Night in the Woods is the subject of this episode's Spotlight. Our guest is Megan Bracker and she is introduced around the 01:10:34 mark.Subscribe to Storytelling Breakdown wherever you get your podcasts. You can find out more about this show at storytellingbreakdown.com. There you can also find our blog community and support us through Patreon. You can contact us via email at info@storytelling-breakdown.com or using the Storytelling Breakdown Facebook or Instagram.Storytelling Breakdown is hosted by co-founders Ben Clemmer and Caleb Meyer. Since the beginning of 2022, Storytelling Breakdown has also been hosted by Stephen Stachofsky and Larissa Whitaker. Our theme music is by Kurt Roembke. Our logo is by Daniel Church. Our podcast is hosted by John Dawkins and Wayneshout Productions. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

On this episode we're joined by Curtis Yarvin to talk about the HBO series The Young Pope and Bogle Petit Syrah (2018). Thanks for listening! Subscribe to Curtis Yarvin's Substack at graymirror.substack.com

This week we're discussing ‘The Mad Women's Ball' with the “Mad Woman of Podcasting” a.k.a. “The Young Pope of Citywalk” – Julia Prescott. We also answer a call on our ‘Hotline' about the actor performances that seem like auditions for other films. Plus, we give an update on our favorite unauthorized Celine Dion biopic that we've never seen – ‘Aline.' And, as always, we've got ‘Staff Picks.'In news, Chris Pratt to voice Mario, Billy Eichner's upcoming rom-com will feature an all LGBTQ+ principle cast, and Paul Verhoeven's ‘Benedetta' gets the Catholics all riled up.Take a short quiz on Smalls.com/MAXFILM to customize your Sampler and use code MAXFILM for a total of 30% off your first order.Staff Picks:Ify – Untold: Deal with the DevilAlonso – Stories of Resistance: Documentaries by Arthur DongDrea – Old HenryJulia – For The Record: TarantinoWith Ify Nwadiwe, Alonso Duralde, Drea Clark, and Julia Prescott

Puntata a cura di Jacopo Bulgarini d'Elci e Francesca Sarah Toich. Tutti i Papi di Sorrentino: in questa puntata retrospettiva del podcast, discutiamo di The Young Pope (2016) e The New Pope (2020), create e dirette da Paolo Sorrentino (disponibili su Sky e NOW). Parliamo di una serie (o meglio di due serie consecutive) del tutto eccezionali nel contesto della produzione televisiva italiana. Sontuose, stilisticamente formidabili, capaci di affrontare temi giganteschi: come quello dello scandalo del sacro, della dimensione spirituale in un mondo secolarizzato, del dialogo e conflitto tra ragione e fede. E con due protagonisti straordinari, e diversamente pop, come Jude Law e John Malkovich - entrambi alle prese con le trame del fantastico Silvio Orlando. “2 voci, 1 serie”: dialoghi sulle cose che ci piacciono, o ci interessano, nel podcast di Mondoserie.MUSICA: Fluidscape di Kevin MacLeod è un brano concesso in uso tramite licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Fonte: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100393 Artista: http://incompetech.com/ Parte del progetto: https://www.mondoserie.it/Collegati a MONDOSERIE sui social: https://www.facebook.com/mondoseriehttps://www.instagram.com/mondoserie.it/ https://twitter.com/mondoserie_it https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwXpMjWOcPbFwdit0QJNnXQ https://www.linkedin.com/in/mondoserie/

In this minisode, Alexz and Ashley catch up on the content they have consumed lately. Alexz watched THE TRIALS OF GABRIEL FERNANDEZ, HUNTERS, GOOD OMENS, FANTASY ISLAND, THE INVISIBLE MAN, and THE STUFF. Ashley watched THE OUTSIDER season finale, CRIMSON PEAK, MA, and THE YOUNG POPE. Together, they caught a screening of PARASITE at the Alamo Drafthouse and praised this year's Best Picture winner. Note: This episode was recorded on Anchor. There may be some experimental lo-fi sounds heard, but we promise it's not aliens. www.ghoulchat.com Please subscribe, rate and review us on all our streaming platforms! Follow us on Instagram and Twitter! @ghoulchat @williamfrench @jeanmarli @alexznyx @ashleynrhernandez Intro song "Holy Prayer" by BASSBEAR --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

REPOST JANUARY 12, 2020: Bill Frost (SLUGMag.com & X96 Radio From Hell) and Tommy Milagro (MBA in Dranks) talk The Critics Choice Awards, Jay & Silent Bob Reboot, The Young Pope, The Magicians, 68 Whiskey, Sex Education, 9-1-1: Lone Star, Avenue 5, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Medical Police, Rasslin' News and Bill Burr Presents: The Ringers. Drinking: Rum from OFFICIAL TV sponsor Outlaw Distillery.

It's a new year for EHG, and a new journey for The Bachelor. Jeff Drake returns to talk about the special madness of Corinne, plus we pick our winners and wonder whether watching UnREAL has enhanced our experience of the original. The Blotter Presents caught us up with the Menendezes and OJ, and we debated whether Dave would hate Canadian outlaw period drama Frontier before going around the dial with One Day At A Time's reboot, The Young Pope, Sleepy Hollow, and games we play with Siri on Apple TV. Caroline tried to Psych us out in the Canon; the CW lost and NBC News won; and Game Time put us all to work on the chain gang. Can we steal you for a second -- for an all-new Extra Hot Great? TOPICS Lead Topic: