POPULARITY
Categories
Edgar Hita está contento, aunque en redes sociales no siempre sean educados con el. Luismi Pérez y el Tete se baten en duelo de refranes. Repasamos la prensa, la actualidad deportiva y nos detenemos en la contraportada. Cerramos con Adriana Mourelos y un grabófono cargado de actualidad. Todo esto junto a David Muñoz y todos sus personajes.
El periodista José F. Peláez ironiza en Más de Uno sobre el caos en la tramitación de los decretos de vivienda, que regulan una misma materia con disposiciones diferentesConviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mas-noticias--4412383/support.ESCUCHAR RADIO
Claro. Mantendría el mismo tono que usamos para Jorge: menos hoja de vida y más invitación a descubrir la persona detrás del pajarero.En este episodio de Charlas Pajareras, Niky & Mauro conversan con Lelis Navarrete, biólogo ecuatoriano, guía de aves y un extraordinario conocedor de las voces de las aves de Sudamérica.Una conversación para recorrer su historia: cómo comenzó su relación con las aves, cómo convirtió esa pasión en una vida recorriendo diferentes territorios y cómo desarrolló esa capacidad de escuchar un bosque y reconocer a sus protagonistas antes de verlos.Pero, como siempre en Charlas Pajareras, queremos ir más allá de la trayectoria profesional para conocer a la persona detrás del pajarero: sus historias de campo, los encuentros que han marcado su camino, su mirada sobre la pajarería en Ecuador y todo lo que ha aprendido después de tantos años viviendo alrededor de las aves.Una charla sobre aves y sonidos, pero también sobre memoria, viajes, amistad, aprendizaje y esa curiosidad que nos lleva una y otra vez al campo.
Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Episodio exclusivo para suscriptores de Se Habla Español en Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iVoox y Patreon: Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2E2vhVqLNtiO2TyOjfK987 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/sehablaespanol Buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/sehablaespanol/w/6450 Donaciones: https://paypal.me/sehablaespanol Contacto: sehablaespanolpodcast@gmail.com Facebook: www.facebook.com/sehablaespanolpodcast Twitter: @espanolpodcast Hola, ¿cómo va todo? ¿Qué tal ha ido el mes de septiembre? En mi caso, ya he vuelto a la rutina aquí en Luxemburgo después de esas dos semanas de vacaciones que te comenté. Hemos tenido tiempo de estar con nuestros hijos, de pasar unos días a la orilla del mar y de hacer todas las cosas pendientes que teníamos en España. Y volviendo a las vacaciones, en esa época del año es muy habitual ver mercadillos en zonas turísticas. Un mercadillo es un sitio al aire libre donde se venden distintos objetos, desde ropa hasta joyas. Y algunos de esos objetos no son auténticos, sino que son falsos. Están falsificados. Parecen auténticos, pero no lo son. Así que, déjame empezar con una pregunta. ¿Alguna vez has comprado un producto falsificado? Y no me refiero necesariamente a un bolso de lujo de miles de euros. Puede ser una camiseta de fútbol, unas gafas de sol, un reloj, unos auriculares o cualquier producto que imitara a una marca conocida. Si te parece, contesto yo. En 2024 hicimos un viaje a Vietnam para celebrar los 25 años de nuestro matrimonio y los 50 que cumplíamos tanto mi mujer como yo. Era el momento ideal para hacer un gran viaje. Pues bien, allí compramos un abrigo de la marca North Face en una tienda que vendía productos de esa marca tan conocida. El precio era bastante asequible y no preguntamos si el abrigo era auténtico, aunque nos fuimos con la impresión de que era falso, claro, porque los auténticos cuestan mucho más dinero. Lo curioso es que mucha gente respondería que no, que nunca han comprado un producto falsificado. Pero, en realidad, las falsificaciones están mucho más presentes en nuestra vida de lo que pensamos. Como te decía, a veces las vemos en mercadillos, en puestos callejeros o en tiendas sospechosamente baratas. Pero hoy en día también aparecen en Internet, en redes sociales y en páginas web que, a primera vista, parecen completamente normales. Y estamos hablando de un negocio enorme. Tan enorme que las falsificaciones provocan pérdidas de más de mil millones de euros al año en España en sectores como la moda, la joyería, los bolsos y los relojes. Además, parece que comprar productos falsificados es más habitual de lo que muchos imaginan. Según los datos europeos, alrededor de uno de cada ocho ciudadanos reconoce haber comprado alguna vez una copia de forma consciente. Entre los jóvenes, la cifra es todavía mayor: aproximadamente uno de cada cuatro. Y aquí hay algo importante. Mucha gente piensa que el único problema es que las marcas pierden dinero. Pero no es tan simple. Muchos de estos productos no pasan controles de calidad, pueden estar fabricados con materiales de peor calidad y, además, las autoridades llevan años advirtiendo de que detrás de algunas falsificaciones hay redes criminales organizadas, como sucede en la noticia que vamos a escuchar ahora mismo. Por darte alguna pista, habla de una operación que nos muestra la verdadera dimensión de un negocio ilegal que mueve enormes cantidades de dinero y que sigue creciendo gracias a la facilidad con la que hoy se pueden vender estos productos. Pertenece a Radio Nacional de España. Escucha con atención. “Parada ahora en Baleares. En Mallorca la Guardia Civil ha intervenido nada menos que 115.000 joyas falsificadas. Las piezas eran reproducciones de conocidas marcas de lujo que se distribuían al por mayor y al por menor. Cuatro personas están siendo investigadas por su presunta autoría de un delito contra la propiedad industrial. Paula Bendito. Miles de pulseras, collares, pendientes, anillos y brazaletes que imitaban los diseños de marcas internacionales de joyería de lujo. De haberse vendido como artículos originales, tendrían un valor de cientos de millones de euros. Es la estimación que hacen las marcas afectadas. Sus especialistas se desplazaron a Mallorca desde Madrid para colaborar en la valoración pericial de todo el material. Es la mayor cantidad de joyas falsas intervenidas en Baleares. Más de 115.000 piezas que la Guardia Civil, tras meses de investigación, ha encontrado en una nave industrial de Palma. Hay cuatro personas investigadas por participar presuntamente en la trama.” Esta última palabra, trama, puede ser el argumento de una película o de un libro, pero aquí significa otra cosa. Enseguida llegamos ahí. Pero vamos a empezar por el principio. Parada: En la radio, una parada es un cambio de tema o de lugar dentro del programa. Es como decir: "ahora vamos a hablar de otra cosa". Ejemplos: Hacemos una parada en Francia para conocer una noticia curiosa. Nuestra siguiente parada es Argentina, donde veremos otra historia interesante. Intervenir: Cuando la policía interviene productos, significa que los encuentra y los confisca porque cree que están relacionados con una actividad ilegal. Ejemplos: La policía intervino miles de productos falsificados. Las autoridades intervinieron una gran cantidad de dinero. Al por mayor: Vender al por mayor significa vender grandes cantidades de productos a otras empresas o comerciantes, no directamente al cliente final. Ejemplos: Esta empresa vende ropa al por mayor. Compran los productos al por mayor y luego los revenden. Al por menor: Vender al por menor significa vender directamente a las personas que van a usar el producto. Ejemplos: La tienda vende al por menor. Puedes comprar una sola unidad porque venden al por menor. Presunta: Presunta significa "supuesta". Se usa cuando algo todavía no ha sido demostrado y sigue siendo una sospecha. Ejemplos: La policía investiga a una persona por su presunta participación en el delito. Hablan de una presunta estafa porque el caso aún está siendo investigado. Pulsera: Una pulsera es una joya o accesorio que se lleva alrededor de la muñeca. Ejemplos: Me regalaron una pulsera por mi cumpleaños. Lleva una pulsera de plata en la mano derecha. Collar: Un collar es una joya que se lleva alrededor del cuello. Ejemplos: Compró un collar para hacer un regalo. El collar tenía una piedra de color azul. Brazalete: Un brazalete es parecido a una pulsera, pero normalmente es más grande, más rígido o más llamativo. Ejemplos: La actriz llevaba un gran brazalete dorado. Encontraron varios brazaletes entre las joyas falsas. Valoración pericial: Es el análisis que hacen los expertos para determinar qué es un objeto, cuánto vale o si es auténtico o falso. Ejemplos: Los especialistas realizaron una valoración pericial de las joyas. La valoración pericial confirmó que los relojes eran falsificados. Trama: Una trama es un grupo de personas que actúan juntas para realizar una actividad ilegal o sospechosa. Ejemplos: La policía descubrió una trama dedicada al fraude. Los investigadores sospechan que detrás del negocio había una trama organizada. “Parada ahora en Baleares. En Mallorca la Guardia Civil ha intervenido nada menos que 115.000 joyas falsificadas. Las piezas eran reproducciones de conocidas marcas de lujo que se distribuían al por mayor y al por menor. Cuatro personas están siendo investigadas por su presunta autoría de un delito contra la propiedad industrial. Paula Bendito. Miles de pulseras, collares, pendientes, anillos y brazaletes que imitaban los diseños de marcas internacionales de joyería de lujo. De haberse vendido como artículos originales, tendrían un valor de cientos de millones de euros. Es la estimación que hacen las marcas afectadas. Sus especialistas se desplazaron a Mallorca desde Madrid para colaborar en la valoración pericial de todo el material. Es la mayor cantidad de joyas falsas intervenidas en Baleares. Más de 115.000 piezas que la Guardia Civil, tras meses de investigación, ha encontrado en una nave industrial de Palma. Hay cuatro personas investigadas por participar presuntamente en la trama.” Ahora, con todo más claro, vamos con una versión de la noticia cambiando el mayor número de palabras por sinónimos. Aquí va. La Guardia Civil ha confiscado la increíble cantidad de 115.000 piezas de joyería falsificadas en Mallorca. Se trataba de copias de conocidas firmas de lujo que se comercializaban tanto en grandes cantidades como directamente a los consumidores. Cuatro individuos están siendo investigados por su supuesta participación en un delito relacionado con la protección de marcas y diseños registrados. Entre el material hallado había miles de pulseras, colgantes, pendientes, sortijas y brazaletes que reproducían los modelos de prestigiosas marcas internacionales de joyería. Según los cálculos realizados por las empresas perjudicadas, si estas piezas se hubieran vendido como auténticas, su precio total habría alcanzado varios cientos de millones de euros. Para analizar el material, expertos de las marcas afectadas viajaron desde Madrid hasta Mallorca y colaboraron en la tasación y evaluación técnica de las piezas encontradas. Se trata de la mayor incautación de joyas falsas realizada hasta la fecha en Baleares. Después de varios meses de pesquisas, los agentes localizaron más de 115.000 artículos en un almacén industrial de Palma. La investigación continúa y, por el momento, hay cuatro sospechosos vinculados presuntamente a esta red dedicada a la distribución de productos falsificados. Sinónimos utilizados Intervenir → confiscar, incautar. Joyas → piezas de joyería, artículos. Falsificadas → falsas, copiadas. Piezas → artículos, productos. Reproducciones → copias. Marcas de lujo → firmas de lujo, prestigiosas marcas. Distribuir → comercializar, vender. Al por mayor → en grandes cantidades, a mayoristas. Al por menor → directamente a los consumidores, al cliente final. Personas → individuos, sospechosos. Presunta autoría → supuesta participación. Delito contra la propiedad industrial → delito relacionado con la protección de marcas y diseños registrados. Imitar → reproducir, copiar. Diseños → modelos. Valor → precio. Especialistas → expertos. Desplazarse → viajar, trasladarse. Valoración pericial → tasación, evaluación técnica. Cantidad → volumen, cifra. Tras meses de investigación → después de varios meses de pesquisas. Encontrar → localizar, descubrir. Nave industrial → almacén industrial. Trama → red, organización. “Parada ahora en Baleares. En Mallorca la Guardia Civil ha intervenido nada menos que 115.000 joyas falsificadas. Las piezas eran reproducciones de conocidas marcas de lujo que se distribuían al por mayor y al por menor. Cuatro personas están siendo investigadas por su presunta autoría de un delito contra la propiedad industrial. Paula Bendito. Miles de pulseras, collares, pendientes, anillos y brazaletes que imitaban los diseños de marcas internacionales de joyería de lujo. De haberse vendido como artículos originales, tendrían un valor de cientos de millones de euros. Es la estimación que hacen las marcas afectadas. Sus especialistas se desplazaron a Mallorca desde Madrid para colaborar en la valoración pericial de todo el material. Es la mayor cantidad de joyas falsas intervenidas en Baleares. Más de 115.000 piezas que la Guardia Civil, tras meses de investigación, ha encontrado en una nave industrial de Palma. Hay cuatro personas investigadas por participar presuntamente en la trama.” Perfecto. Y ahora, antes de terminar, una última pregunta que me parece muy interesante. Cuando vemos un collar de lujo que cuesta 3.000, 5.000 o incluso 10.000 euros, ¿realmente cuesta tanto fabricarlo? Pues la respuesta, en la mayoría de los casos, es no. A ver, no estoy diciendo que sea barato. Si hablamos de oro, diamantes o piedras preciosas, evidentemente los materiales tienen un valor. Además, hay diseñadores, artesanos, transportistas, vendedores... Hay muchas personas trabajando detrás de cada producto. Pero aun así, el coste de fabricación suele ser bastante menor que el precio que vemos en la tienda. Entonces, ¿qué estamos pagando exactamente? Pues muchas veces estamos pagando la marca. Estamos pagando el diseño, la historia de la empresa, su reputación, sus campañas de publicidad, sus tiendas exclusivas y, sobre todo, la sensación de exclusividad. Piensa en algo muy simple. Dos personas pueden llevar un collar bastante parecido. A simple vista, quizá ni siquiera notes la diferencia. Pero uno puede costar 50 euros y otro 5.000. ¿Por qué? Porque el valor no está solamente en el objeto. También está en lo que representa. De hecho, si lo pensamos bien, esa es precisamente la razón por la que existen las falsificaciones. Hay personas que quieren la estética o la imagen de una marca de lujo, pero no quieren, o no pueden, pagar el precio del producto original. Y ahí es donde aparecen las copias. Claro, el problema es que una copia puede parecerse mucho por fuera, pero normalmente no ofrece las mismas garantías, los mismos materiales ni los mismos controles de calidad. Así que, al final, podemos estar de acuerdo o no con los precios de las marcas de lujo, pero una cosa parece clara: cuando alguien compra uno de esos productos, no está pagando únicamente por un collar, un bolso o un reloj. Está pagando también por una marca, una imagen y una idea de exclusividad. Y precisamente por eso hay un mercado tan enorme de productos falsificados en todo el mundo. Porque copiar un objeto es relativamente fácil. Lo difícil es copiar todo lo que una marca ha construido durante décadas. Venga, terminamos ya con el repaso a las palabras y expresiones que hemos analizado hoy. Parada: En la radio, una parada es un cambio de tema o de lugar dentro del programa. Intervenir: Cuando la policía interviene productos, significa que los encuentra y los confisca porque cree que están relacionados con una actividad ilegal. Al por mayor: Vender grandes cantidades de productos a otras empresas o comerciantes, no directamente al cliente final. Al por menor: Vender al por menor significa vender directamente a las personas que van a usar el producto. Presunta: Presunta significa "supuesta". Pulsera: Una pulsera es una joya o accesorio que se lleva alrededor de la muñeca. Collar: Un collar es una joya que se lleva alrededor del cuello. Brazalete: Un brazalete es parecido a una pulsera, pero normalmente es más grande, más rígido o más llamativo. Valoración pericial: Es el análisis que hacen los expertos para determinar qué es un objeto, cuánto vale o si es auténtico o falso. Trama: Una trama es un grupo de personas que actúan juntas para realizar una actividad ilegal o sospechosa. Escucha este episodio completo y accede a todo el contenido exclusivo de Se Habla Español. Descubre antes que nadie los nuevos episodios, y participa en la comunidad exclusiva de oyentes en https://go.ivoox.com/sq/171214
Afonso Laginha, ator de 23 anos e filho de Pedro Laginha, fala sobre os desafios que marcaram a construção da sua identidade, no Alta Definição em podcast, com Daniel Oliveira. A gaguez, presente desde a infância, tornou-se um elemento determinante na sua relação com a linguagem e acabou por contribuir para o desenvolvimento de uma maior confiança. O teatro, iniciado na escola secundária, foi fundamental nesse processo de autodescoberta e afirmação pessoal. Na emissão de 26 de setembro, Afonso Laginha recorda também o tumor diagnosticado aos nove anos, que ocupava parte significativa do pulmão direito e o levou a ser operado aos onze. Fala dos anos de tratamento, das marcas físicas e emocionais deixadas pela doença e de uma posterior passagem pela depressão. Apesar das dificuldades, o ator encontrou na curiosidade pelo futuro uma força para continuar. Afonso reflete ainda sobre a necessidade de ultrapassar a procura constante por aprovação e de aprender a enfrentar os próprios desafios, revelando uma personalidade marcada pela vulnerabilidade, pela resiliência e por uma vontade permanente de se conhecer melhor. Ouça aqui a conversa em podcast.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Começaram as Semis do Paulista Masculino com duas séries que pareciam ter tudo para serem muito disputadas e até agora não foram, com os favoritos controlando bem os jogos e mostrando porque eles são os favoritos. Além disso, temos de falar do Real Madrid levando a primeira Euroleague Super Cup. Abrimos, claro, falando do basquete nacional e das duas vitórias em 2 jogos do Mogi, que mesmo com uma segunda partida absurda do Elinho, venceu com tranquilidade os dois jogos e está a uma vitória da final. Como Franca é a cidade mais longe destas semis, o Franca e Paulistano tiveram apenas um jogo e, como falamos, vitória tranquila do Franca, que tem tudo para repetir o feito em São Paulo no ginásio do Paulistano e ir enfrentar o Mogi na final, na rivalidade enorme que parece estar se formando para esta temporada no basquete nacional. No feminino tivemos só dois jogos e os dois com o time de Guarulhos jogando, e levando dois chocolates. Claro, o time é novo, um trabalho em formação e que só se formou pouquinho antes do começo dos jogos do Paulista. E pior, um paulista feminino desidratado, contando só com 4 times, e 3 de LBF, e entre os grandes, não tinha como ser diferente esta primeira temporada para o time da grande São Paulo. Na Europa, a volta da Euroleague com a primeira semana trouxe ótimos jogos e times se mostrando mais preparados para alimentar bem a disputa pelos playoffs. Mas antes da primeira semana tivemos a estreia da Euroleague Super Cup com o Real Madrid se sagrando o primeiro campeão em cima do Olympiacos. O legal foi ver o quanto os jogos foram parelhos, com a maior diferença tendo sido na disputa de terceiro e quarto, e foi só de 8 pontos. O mais engraçado foi que o Real Madrid e o Olympiacos se enfrentaram na primeira partida da temporada regular da Euro e ai o Olympiacos ganhou por 1 ponto. Além disso tivemos a primeira rodada do classificatório da Euroleague feminina onde, com certeza, assassinamos algumas pronuncias. Tivemos também o final da temporada Regular da WNBA que em três dias já tem o começo dos playoffs. E claro, não podia faltar a NBA que chega com mais um capitulo da novela que você mais gosta de odiar, a novela Duren. Falamos disso, notícias diversas, respondemos as duvidas da galera da Live e fizemos o maior momento OK OK do podcast até agora. Então não perca tempo, clica no play e vem com a gente!
Este boletim traz um resumo das principais notícias do dia na análise de Samuel Possebon, editor chefe da TELETIME.TELETIME é a publicação de referência para quem acompanha o mercado de telecomunicações, tecnologia e Internet no Brasil. Uma publicação independente dedicada ao debate aprofundado e criterioso das questões econômicas, regulatórias, tecnológicas, operacionais e estratégicas das empresas do setor. Se você ainda não acompanha a newsletter TELETIME, inscreva-se no nosso site www.teletime.com.br e fique ligado no dia a dia do mercado de telecom. É simples e é gratuito.Você ainda pode acompanhar TELETIME nas redes sociais:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/teletimenews/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/teletimenews/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Teletime/ Ou entre em nosso canal no Whatsapp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbAulbCADTOEwFog2l1J Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
“Claro que lo dijo”: Lorenzo Meyer aplaude respuesta de Sheinbaum a TrumpEnlace para apoyar vía Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/julioastilleroEnlace para hacer donaciones vía PayPal:https://www.paypal.me/julioastilleroCuenta para hacer transferencias a cuenta BBVA a nombre de Julio Hernández López: 1539408017CLABE: 012 320 01539408017 2Tienda:https://julioastillerotienda.com/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-mananero-radio--3086101/support.
Arrancamos el nuevo curso de Corsarios, empezando fuerte con un especial sobre «The Final Countdown» de EUROPE que está cumpliendo 40 años (y ellos vienen a presentarlo a nuestro país en pocos días). "Tino nino, tinononinoniiiii"... Seguro que al ver la imagen la melodía os ha resonado en la cabeza... ¡EUROPE!... Claro que sí, y hoy comenzamos la nueva temporada corsaria con un monográfico sobre «The Final Countdown» ¿Por qué? Pues porque después de pasar el verano en Tortuga Bay (y en ese querido "Black Hand Inn" que es El Mono que Chilla el mejor Pub de Rock de España) volvemos con las pilas cargadas para abordar los temas más polémicos en estos nuevos programas, y hacer justicia heavy. ¿El tiempo ha sido justo con este trabajo? ¿Y con EUROPE? ¿Cómo es de trascendente? ¿Es tan moñas como se dice? ¿Cuánta gente lo ha escuchado entero antes de opinar?… Pues todo eso y mucho más abordaremos esta noche en el programa mientras pinchamos el LP íntegro, alguna curiosidad y desgranamos un montón de información e intrahistoria alrededor de un disco que cambió el panorama del Hard Rock y el Heavy para siempre. Ya lo podéis escuchar en las principales plataformas de contenidos digitales y podcast.
Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! U.M.E.- Marimarlasconazo a mí me ha quedado claro (29-08-2026) Más contenido inédito en: https://www.es-tv.es Aportaciones a Raúl: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=40527138 Nº de cuenta: ES75 3018 5746 3520 3462 2213 Bizum: 696339508 o 650325992 Aportaciones a David: https://www.patreon.com/davidsantosvlog Nº de Cuenta: ES78 0073 0100 5306 7538 9734 Bizum: +34 644919278 Aportaciones a Equipo-F: TITULAR: EQUIPO F CUENTA: ES34 1465 0100 9417 5070 9106 C ÓDIGO SWIFT: INGDESMM Conviértete en miembro de este canal para disfrutar de ventajas: https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-un-murciano-encabronao-david-santos-los-audios_sq_f11099064_1.html Canales de U.M.E.: Un murciano encabronao (Anmistiado) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnetJQrKgE6M2cuM3z0Y8pQ Raúl U.M.E. (Anmistiado) https://www.youtube.com/@raulu.m.e.canal2720 El Cid murcianizador (Anmistiado) https://www.youtube.com/@ElCidmurciano/ Un murciano encabronao 3 U.M.E. (Anmistiado) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5W_DTLvV-B9F2RhV9TCdeQ/videos Raúl U.M.E. Canal 2 (Defunto) Un murciano encabronao 3 U.M.E. (Defunto) Cosicas de Raúl (Defunto) RDM (Defunto) Raúl Viva España (Defunto) Raúl de Murcia (Defunto) Canales de David Santos: David Santos: https://www.youtube.com/c/DavidSantosVlog David Santos directos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9tKe5zFEb6BHVuaYH7qzTw/featured https://www.twitch.tv/davidsantos_oficial/Escucha este episodio completo y accede a todo el contenido exclusivo de Un murciano encabronao y David Santos. Los audios.. Descubre antes que nadie los nuevos episodios, y participa en la comunidad exclusiva de oyentes en https://go.ivoox.com/sq/1099064
Com as competições paradas e só retornando nos próximos dias, nosso prato principal foi (como tinha de ser) as finais do Mundial Feminino de basquete. E que beleza foi acompanhar a competição. A Espanha fez uma partida muito madura contra os EUA e mostrou que é possível sim chegar no mesmo nível delas , enquanto a França atropelou as donas da casa Alemanha. Infelizmente nas finais, A França não soube segurar as americanas que, de repente, não só viraram o jogo, como abriram e abriram bem. Ficou um gosto amargo do que poderia ter sido, mas as francesas sobem mais um degrau em demonstração do poderio ofensivo durante a competição e vão se acostumando a finais. O que será que Los Angeles 2028 nos reserva. No terceiro e quarto, a Alemanha não viu a cor da bola de novo contra as espanholas, que ganharam com alguma tranquilidade. No resto das competições, falamos da importante vitória do Paulistano na Youth BCLA em cima do Obras Sanitarias, corando quem faz o melhor trabalho de base do Brasil e, aparentemente, nas Américas. O Paulista volta no dia 21 com as semis e as coisas devem esquentar. Claro que a maior possibilidade é termos um Mogi e Franca na final, preparando o terreno para uma NBB bem parelha, mas se alguém pode fazer frente aos dois são Corinthians e Paulistano. Vai ser encardido. A Euro também volta semana que vem, mas antes de voltar, tem a estreia do novo campeonato, A Euroleague Super Cup, que vai ser disputada neste final de semana em Abu Dhabi com Real Madrid, Fenerbahçe, Olympiacos e Dubai. A WNBA volta depois do Mundial com cinco jogos na quinta 17, dia que gravamos. E claro, falamos muito sobre a novela Duren no Pistons, o processo penal em cima de Clippers e Kawhi, respondemos as perguntas de quem estava com a gente na live e muito mais. Então não perde tempo, clica no play e vem com a gente.
Los valores castigados esta semana por culpa de la inteligencia artificial a examen
O primeiro jogo da temporada não poderia ser melhor! Mentira, poderia sim. De qualquer forma, o resultado foi muito positivo, e vamos falar sobre tudo isso neste episódio!E É CLARO... TÁ TODO MUNDO AQUI EMPOLGADO COM O JOGO DO RIO DE JANEIRO!!!!! Seja torcedor de elite e financie este podcast através do apoia.se Você também pode colaborar fazendo uma doação através do PIX: casadocorvobr@gmail.com Entre em contato conosco através das nossas redes sociais: Meta: @casadocorvobrDemais redes: @CasaDoCorvo ENTRE NO NOSSO SERVIDOR DO DISCORD E FAÇA PARTE DA COMUNIDADE MAIS ELITE DE TODAS!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
En una nueva edición de Página 13, Consuelo Saavedra y Kike Mujica conversaron con los columnistas Matías Claro y Juan Diego Santa Cruz sobre los mejores libros chilenos para recomendar en septiembre y la forma en que los chilenos han cambiado su forma de celebrar las Fiestas Patrias.
Apoie o UP no Orelo: clique aqui!Não está no título, mas rolou um State of Play tem uns dias aí e, por incrível que pareça, nós lembramos dele! Mas isso é a coisa mais importante deste podcast? Claro que não! Neste episódio, o UP se reúne para destrinchar nossas emoções em relação ao Nintendo Direct especial de 40 anos de Zelda, trazemos nossos destaques da última Direct geral da Nintendo e também comentamos o State of Play, porque não é só de Nintendo que se faz o mundo dos videogames.O nosso muito obrigado a: Bruno Hatto, Carlos Bonomi, Rodrigo Kumazawa, biel tomarchio, Akemi Nakamura, Wellington Oliveira, Eric Quarterolli, Luiz Fernando Moratelli, Andre Britto, Kainã Leão, Italo Albuquerque, Johnata Gabriel, João Pedro, Joao+Pedro Aguiari, Mateus, Gabriel Barros, Andre Benia, Cicero Ruschel, Brenno Novais, Leonardo Azzi Martins, Arthur Valladão, dudu pansica, Suellen Amorim, Júlia Paterniani, Paulo Felisbino, Felipe Gil, Mariana Janoti, Carlos Jefferson, Arthur Goulart, Rafael Yabiku, Guilherme Shuto, Marcel Kuhne, Filipovisky De La Fuente, Ruan, Agmar, Vivian Shintate, Gabriel Pavão, Filipe Dottori, Daniel do Valle, César Mori, Jacobico Catiau, Tales de Deus Diniz, Davi, Luiz Rafael Santos Leite, Guilherme Serravalle, Diego Almeida, Vitor Ludwig, Juan Alves, Leonardo Nogueira, Marquinhos Maia, Jéssica Macedo, Breno Bezerra Bluhm, Lucas Eid, Juan, Andre Birck, Victor Toffano, Guilherme Magalhães, Bruno Luiz Korckievicz, Marina, Rafael Ramalli da Silva, Luiz Gustavo, Anne Verrino, Alexandre Bellini Tasca, Helio Cannone, Leonardo Ribeiro Teles De Souza, Fernando Belincanta, Lucas Brum, Rodrigo Taira, Paulo Piazza, Kelvin Santos, Tiago Alves Fernandes, Samuel Regis, Vinicius Marques, Joao, Jonas Sá, Maryana Gois, Letícia Camperoni, Rodrigo Souza, Hermano Cavalcante, Moisés Resende, Priscila Tonet, Bianca Hayashi, Caio Barcelos, Renato Bena, Lucas, Guilherme Rodrigues, Victor Guimarães, Matheus Perugini, Gabriel Bisuli, Caio Cardoso, Vivian, Pedro Vital Brazil, Sergie Arruda, Gustavo Garcia, Vitor Araujo, Venigma, João Henrique, Fabricio Reis, Henrique Fernandes Veri Marques, Gabriel Bittencourt Borowski, REGIS F G FREITAS, Luan Germano, Anderson Barbosa, Felipe Dal Molin, Rafael Silva, Marcos Eduardo, Andre Jarenkow, Victor “VicGurg” Gurgel, Érica Fontana, Arthur Luiz, Isadora Marques, Daniel Baumgratz, Giovanne, Daniel Ferreira de Camargo, Clarissa Farias, Daniel Bandoni, Thiago Yakomizo Buainain, Daniel Labres, Amanda Nunes, Matheus Vasques, André Luís Teixeira, Bruno Correia Milani, Ednardo M.Toledo, João CassorieloSiga o UP:Orelo | Twitter | Twitch | Instagram | DiscordContato comercial: contato@somosup.com
Um programa com tudo que você precisa saber!
Los feminicidios cometidos en Cuba en lo que va de 2026 ya superaron los del año pasado: 49 en 2025 y 52 en 2026 son las cifras que comunicó este lunes el Observatorio de Género de Alas Tensas (OGAT). La plataforma alertó que la pobreza de la isla pone en mayor peligro a las mujeres porque no tienen dónde encontrar refugio. Noemí Pérez López, así se llamaba la última víctima de feminicidio en Cuba. Tenía 38 años cuando su expareja la asesinó en la provincia de Las Tunas, al oriente de la isla, el pasado 8 de agosto. Es la víctima de feminicidio número 52 en lo que va de 2026. “Es un Estado que no previene los feminicidios” “Este caso permite explicar varios problemas a la vez. Primero, el principal peligro sigue estando muchas veces dentro del círculo íntimo, y esto es uno de los patrones que hemos identificado, que ocurre dentro del seno de las parejas y exparejas. Son la mayor cantidad de feminicidios”, comenta Ileana Álvarez, directora del Observatorio de Género de Alas Tensas (OGAT). “Segundo”, prosigue, “ocurrió dentro de su propia casa, es decir que, donde presuntamente la víctima debía encontrar el mayor refugio, realmente ocurrió el mayor peligro. Y tercero, el agresor pudo permanecer prófugo durante semanas”. Álvarez denuncia que las autoridades cubanas informan poco o nada de los feminicidios y no protegen a los familiares de las víctimas, quienes corren peligro de amenazas, intimidaciones o represalias por parte de los criminales: “Son las organizaciones independientes que tienen que dar la voz de alarma. Es un Estado que no previene los feminicidios, no previene la violencia de género, no tiene, por ejemplo, refugios para las mujeres que se encuentran en una situación de peligro”. La crisis económica empeora la situación Y los peligros aumentan con la crisis económica crónica que sufre la isla. Las mujeres son las más vulnerables: “Para una mujer que quiere separarse de un agresor, puede resultar extremadamente difícil encontrar otra vivienda, conseguir ingresos suficientes, trasladarse, alimentar a sus hijos o reconstruir una red familiar. Especialmente cuando una parte importante de la familia ha emigrado o, por ejemplo, se encuentra en una situación territorial donde apenas hay conexión, donde apenas hay red de apoyo para las mujeres que se encuentran en peligro”, subraya Ileana Álvarez. “Nuestro informe advierte de que el deterioro de las condiciones de vida, la fragilidad institucional, no explican por sí solo la violencia feminicida. Claro está que sabemos que las causas son estructurales, pero sí agravan la vulnerabilidad y dificultan romper relaciones violentas”, concluye la directora de OGAT, quien atendió esta entrevista desde el exilio en España.
¿Mijita, estás segura de lo que vas a hacer?--Claro que sí manina, lo amo con todo mi corazón--Nooo Cecilia, me refiero a este maletón “gediondo”--No pasa nada, manina--¿Y si te detienen por traficante y no llegas a la boda?
Los feminicidios cometidos en Cuba en lo que va de 2026 ya superaron los del año pasado: 49 en 2025 y 52 en 2026 son las cifras que comunicó este lunes el Observatorio de Género de Alas Tensas (OGAT). La plataforma alertó que la pobreza de la isla pone en mayor peligro a las mujeres porque no tienen dónde encontrar refugio. Noemí Pérez López, así se llamaba la última víctima de feminicidio en Cuba. Tenía 38 años cuando su expareja la asesinó en la provincia de Las Tunas, al oriente de la isla, el pasado 8 de agosto. Es la víctima de feminicidio número 52 en lo que va de 2026. “Es un Estado que no previene los feminicidios” “Este caso permite explicar varios problemas a la vez. Primero, el principal peligro sigue estando muchas veces dentro del círculo íntimo, y esto es uno de los patrones que hemos identificado, que ocurre dentro del seno de las parejas y exparejas. Son la mayor cantidad de feminicidios”, comenta Ileana Álvarez, directora del Observatorio de Género de Alas Tensas (OGAT). “Segundo”, prosigue, “ocurrió dentro de su propia casa, es decir que, donde presuntamente la víctima debía encontrar el mayor refugio, realmente ocurrió el mayor peligro. Y tercero, el agresor pudo permanecer prófugo durante semanas”. Álvarez denuncia que las autoridades cubanas informan poco o nada de los feminicidios y no protegen a los familiares de las víctimas, quienes corren peligro de amenazas, intimidaciones o represalias por parte de los criminales: “Son las organizaciones independientes que tienen que dar la voz de alarma. Es un Estado que no previene los feminicidios, no previene la violencia de género, no tiene, por ejemplo, refugios para las mujeres que se encuentran en una situación de peligro”. La crisis económica empeora la situación Y los peligros aumentan con la crisis económica crónica que sufre la isla. Las mujeres son las más vulnerables: “Para una mujer que quiere separarse de un agresor, puede resultar extremadamente difícil encontrar otra vivienda, conseguir ingresos suficientes, trasladarse, alimentar a sus hijos o reconstruir una red familiar. Especialmente cuando una parte importante de la familia ha emigrado o, por ejemplo, se encuentra en una situación territorial donde apenas hay conexión, donde apenas hay red de apoyo para las mujeres que se encuentran en peligro”, subraya Ileana Álvarez. “Nuestro informe advierte de que el deterioro de las condiciones de vida, la fragilidad institucional, no explican por sí solo la violencia feminicida. Claro está que sabemos que las causas son estructurales, pero sí agravan la vulnerabilidad y dificultan romper relaciones violentas”, concluye la directora de OGAT, quien atendió esta entrevista desde el exilio en España.
Fluent Fiction - Spanish: Jungle Quest: Discovering the Legendary Rubber Duck Race Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/es/episode/2026-09-14-07-38-20-es Story Transcript:Es: En el corazón vibrante de la selva amazónica, las hojas susurraban con cada brisa y el aire estaba cargado de fragancia húmeda y tierra viva.En: In the vibrant heart of the selva amazónica, the leaves whispered with each breeze, and the air was filled with the humid fragrance and living earth.Es: Santiago, un viajero entusiasta, caminaba animado entre los árboles acompañando a sus amigos, Martina y Diego.En: Santiago, an enthusiastic traveler, walked cheerfully among the trees accompanied by his friends, Martina and Diego.Es: La misión era clara, aunque un tanto peculiar: encontrar la legendaria carrera de patos de goma que supuestamente tenía lugar en un río escondido en lo profundo de la selva.En: The mission was clear, though somewhat peculiar: to find the legendary rubber duck race supposedly taking place in a river hidden deep in the jungle.Es: Martina, curiosa pero escéptica, preguntó: "¿Estás seguro, Santiago?En: Martina, curious but skeptical, asked, "Are you sure, Santiago?Es: Nunca había oído hablar de esto".En: I've never heard of this."Es: Diego, jalando la cuerda de su mochila, solo sonrió divertido.En: Diego, tugging on the strap of his backpack, just smiled amusedly.Es: Santiago, con un mapa arrugado sacado de Internet en la mano, contestó: "Claro que sí.En: Santiago, with a crumpled map taken from the Internet in hand, replied, "Of course.Es: Es una tradición antigua, una competencia emocionante.En: It's an ancient tradition, an exciting competition.Es: ¡Confíen en mí!"En: Trust me!"Es: El viaje comenzó bien.En: The journey began well.Es: La vegetación era espesa y cada paso revelaba nuevas criaturas que cantaban y croaban su propia sinfonía.En: The vegetation was thick, and each step revealed new creatures singing and croaking their symphony.Es: Pero pronto la selva mostró su verdadera cara caprichosa.En: But soon, the jungle showed its true capricious nature.Es: Un chaparrón repentino los empapó, las ramas se agitaban encima de ellos como si el propio bosque estuviera bromeando con sus cálculos.En: A sudden downpour drenched them, the branches above them swayed as if the forest itself was joking with their plans.Es: "Vamos bien, creo", dijo Santiago mientras miraba el mapa, que se empapaba más con cada paso.En: "I think we're on the right track," Santiago said while looking at the map, which was getting wetter with every step.Es: "Aquí, a la izquierda... o ¿era a la derecha?"En: "Here, to the left... or was it to the right?"Es: La lluvia cesó, dejando el suelo resbaladizo y brillante.En: The rain stopped, leaving the ground slippery and shiny.Es: Justo cuando pensaban que estaban perdidos, un grupo de guacamayos pasó volando sobre ellos, sus plumas reflejando el sol emergente, como un arco iris viviente.En: Just when they thought they were lost, a group of macaws flew over them, their feathers reflecting the emerging sun like a living rainbow.Es: Luego de horas de caminar y reír, llegaron al río descrito por la leyenda.En: After hours of walking and laughing, they reached the river described in the legend.Es: Pero no había multitudes ni celebraciones.En: But there were no crowds or celebrations.Es: Solo aguas tranquilas y algunos troncos flotantes.En: Only calm waters and some floating logs.Es: Santiago miró sus amigos, esperando una interpretación salvadora de la escena.En: Santiago looked at his friends, hoping for a saving interpretation of the scene.Es: Y entonces, de entre las riberas, salieron unos capibaras.En: And then, from the riverbanks, came some capybaras.Es: Pero estos no eran capibaras normales.En: But these were not ordinary capybaras.Es: Cada uno empujaba un pato de goma por el río, con gran entusiasmo y diversión.En: Each one was pushing a rubber duck down the river with great enthusiasm and fun.Es: Los tres amigos se quedaron atónitos.En: The three friends were astonished.Es: "¿Son estos... los participantes?"En: "Are these... the participants?"Es: preguntó Diego entre risas.En: Diego asked amid laughter.Es: Los capibaras, ajenos a cualquier expectativa humana, siguieron con su juego alegre.En: The capybaras, unaware of any human expectations, continued with their joyful game.Es: Santiago no pudo evitarlo y estalló en carcajadas.En: Santiago couldn't help it and burst into laughter.Es: "¡Creo que encontramos la carrera!"En: "I think we found the race!"Es: exclamó feliz.En: he exclaimed happily.Es: Martina, contagiada por la risa, se unió.En: Martina, caught up in the laughter, joined in.Es: "Es la mejor carrera que he visto", agregó, mientras mojaban sus pies en el agua clara, dejando que algunos de los patos de goma les pasaran rozando.En: "It's the best race I've ever seen," she added, while they soaked their feet in the clear water, letting some of the rubber ducks brush past them.Es: La lección era clara.En: The lesson was clear.Es: No había una carrera tradicional, ni un premio para perseguir.En: There was no traditional race or prize to chase.Es: Sin embargo, la travesía había sido extraordinaria.En: However, the journey had been extraordinary.Es: Mientras el sol descendía, teñido de colores cálidos, Santiago comprendió algo esencial: las verdaderas aventuras no siempre terminan como uno planea.En: As the sun set, painted in warm colors, Santiago understood something essential: true adventures don't always end as planned.Es: Lo importante es el camino y con quién lo compartes.En: What matters is the journey and who you share it with.Es: Así, como la luz se desvanecía detrás de los árboles, Santiago, Martina y Diego siguieron jugando en el río, unidos por la risa, agradecidos por la belleza y el absurdo de su sorprendente odisea en la selva amazónica.En: Thus, as the light faded behind the trees, Santiago, Martina, and Diego continued playing in the river, united by laughter, grateful for the beauty and absurdity of their surprising odyssey in the selva amazónica. Vocabulary Words:the heart: el corazónthe jungle: la selvathe fragrance: la fraganciathe earth: la tierrathe traveler: el viajerothe mission: la misiónthe legend: la leyendathe race: la carrerathe river: el ríothe map: el mapathe creature: la criaturathe symphony: la sinfoníathe downpour: el chaparrónthe branch: la ramathe track: el caminothe macaws: los guacamayosthe feather: la plumathe log: el troncothe scene: la escenathe riverbank: la riberathe capybara: el capibarathe participant: el participantethe game: el juegothe prize: el premiothe journey: la travesíathe interpretation: la interpretaciónthe celebration: la celebraciónthe laughter: la risathe beauty: la bellezathe odyssey: la odisea
Este boletim traz um resumo das principais notícias do dia na análise de Samuel Possebon, editor chefe da TELETIME.TELETIME é a publicação de referência para quem acompanha o mercado de telecomunicações, tecnologia e Internet no Brasil. Uma publicação independente dedicada ao debate aprofundado e criterioso das questões econômicas, regulatórias, tecnológicas, operacionais e estratégicas das empresas do setor. Se você ainda não acompanha a newsletter TELETIME, inscreva-se no nosso site www.teletime.com.br e fique ligado no dia a dia do mercado de telecom. É simples e é gratuito.Você ainda pode acompanhar TELETIME nas redes sociais:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/teletimenews/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/teletimenews/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Teletime/ Ou entre em nosso canal no Whatsapp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbAulbCADTOEwFog2l1J Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Septiembre PaTrío - Tipos de Trios -Comentario- 557 Iniciamos el mes con nuestro gusto por los Tríos. Claro, hay que poner las cartas sobre la mesa: Hablemos de todas las posibilidades, de esos momentos clásicos cuando te juegas la carta esperando que te digan que sí -total dicen que el No ya lo tenemos. ¿Cuál de todos los tríos realmente te gustaría vivir? Porque no es solo los involucrados, es lo que se ofrece en el momento, lo que se puede dar y lo que no. Tengo 4 relatos esta semana -tres que escribí y uno que se improvisó durante el programa con lo que uno de los escuchas envió en vivo. Checalos como parte del Episodio 557. ¿Te quedaste con ganas de más después de este episodio? Perfecto, eso es justo ,lo que buscaba… Llévate el placer un paso más allá Si te gusta escuchar estas historias, imagina lo que te estás perdiendo en la zona exclusiva: Relatos especiales solo para suscriptores Audios más íntimos, más largos y con menos censura Contenido pensado para quienes disfrutan quedarse “un ratito más” conmigo Suscríbete en iVoox y apóyame haciendo clic en el botón “Apoyar”. Además de disfrutar contenido extra, ayudas a que este podcast siga creciendo y yo pueda seguir contándote historias que te suban la temperatura. Contenido exclusivo solo para quienes quieren “ver y oír más” Si este episodio te encendió la imaginación, espera a ver lo que hay del otro lado: Fotos y calendarios sugerentes Audios especiales y material que no comparto en ningún otro lugar Talleres, cursos y más sorpresas para explorar tus fantasías con calma Pasa a lo rico aquí: Contenido exclusivo en SexyQFans: https://sexyqfans.com/cuentalealayola ¿Tienes una historia que te gustaría que yo cuente? Si hay una fantasía, anécdota o recuerdo que te ronda la cabeza y te gustaría escucharla en mi voz, puedes mandármela: Correo: cuentalealayola@gmail.com WhatsApp: https://wa.me/526869457139 ✈️ Telegram: https://www.t.me/cuentalealayola Redes: @cuentalealayola Tu historia podría cobrar vida en vivo por RadioNocturna.com, todos los lunes a las 11:05 PM (hora CdMx): https://radionocturna.com Si ya disfrutaste… también puedes apoyar Si este episodio te hizo compañía, te arrancó un suspiro o te dio alguna idea traviesa: Puedes darme un empujoncito con un donativo en PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/cuentalealayola Cada aporte ayuda a que pueda seguir produciendo episodios, mejorando el audio y creando nuevas historias para ti. Nota picara pero importante Todos los relatos y personajes de este programa son ficción. Algunas historias se inspiran en la realidad, pero cualquier parecido es pura coincidencia… o pura suerte.
En un nuevo capítulo de Réplica, Daniel Mansuy conversó con el filósofo Andrés Claro sobre su libro “El lugar de la utopía”, un texto que explora cómo las ficciones utópicas reconfiguran la manera en que habitamos la comunidad o la ciudad.
Claro que puedes tomar alcohol cuando estás enfermo.
Alô, alô! Por que o Senado é muito importante? Em época de eleições o debate parece se concentrar somente no poder executivo, na presidência. Claro que esté um cargo importante, mas neste ano os cargos do Senado Federal estão passando por uma grande mudança, principalmente para o campo progressista. Por isso nesse episódio Caramelo, Camila e Marx vão explicar como funcionam os três poderes, qual o papel dos Senadores e nos aprofundaremos sobre esse momento de renovação no Senado Federal. Além disso, vamos fazer um levantamento sobre como os Senadores, e seus partidos, votaram nas pautas que consideramos importantes: educação, ambiente, ciência e desigualdade social. Então bora refletir sobre nosso voto para além da briga entre Lula e família Bolsonaro? Da o play e descubra! Novidade: Nova temporada do podcast Sinal de Vida!Estamos produzindo uma nova grande aventura desse podcast narrativo que te emocionou na primeira temporada. Agora acompanhamos uma viagem de campo em meio a Amazônia. Mas para ela acontecer, precisamos do seu apoio, para apoiar e saber mais acesse: www.catarse.com.br/SinalDeVidaPodcast. Assuntos Abordados: 00:00 – Introdução02:35 – Os três poderes. Qual diferença entre Executivo e Legislativo?10:51 – Senado: autorizar operações financeiras externas.14:08 – Renovação do Senado: porque essa eleição é importante?22:55 – Novidade! Novas aventuras no Sinal de Vida!28:37 – Pautas Ambientais: quais partidos as defendem?31:44 – Desigualdade Social: como os partidos votaram?34:34 – Imposto de Renda e outras questões sociais.42:00 – Conclusões: precisamos renovar o Legislativo! Assine pelo Apoia.se Assine pelo Patreon ➡️ Siga o Alô nas Redes:Instagram | Facebook | TikTok | Youtube | Bluesky
Presentamos nuestra charla inicial con Javier Ortiz Cassiani, con León Valencia -director de PARES- con Catalina Valencia, directora del festival Macondo y apartes de la charla de Gonzalo Mallarino en esta segunda versión del Festival Macondo en Aracataca.4 y 5 de septiembre en Aracataca (Magdalena) Un punto de encuentro para la cultura colombiana con la segunda edición del Festival Macondo; se escuchó una sola voz: "Macondo es nuestro"La utilización del concepto MACONDO está en cada calle de Aracataca, en tiendas, ferreterías, Hostales, restaurantes, etc.Está principalmente en conceptos como LA RUTA MACONDO, la serie de NETFLIX y lo que venga en el año del Natalicio Centenario; todos hablarán de "Macondo" y los cataqueros (gentilicio de los nacidos en Aracataca, Magdalena ) no se dejarán robar el derecho a ser los dueños de Macondo y sus vecinos deberemos apoyarlos.PARTICIPAN:Javier Ortiz CassianiLeón ValenciaCatalina ValenciaGonzalo MallarinoFederico Diazgranados
Durante casi veinte años dijimos “nos vemos en el Movistar”. Ahora tendremos que aprender a decir Santander Arena. ¿Pero qué compra realmente una marca cuando compra el nombre de un estadio? En este capítulo ponemos frente a frente dos apuestas del mismo Santander: Work/Café, una idea nacida desde el propio negocio, y Santander Arena, un activo cargado de música, cultura y recuerdos al que ahora llega la marca. Y sumamos al Teatro Nescafé de las Artes, Claro Arena y casi veinte años de Movistar Arena para hacernos una pregunta bastante más grande que el sponsorship: ¿estar en la cabeza de millones significa necesariamente construir marca?Dato mata relato.O lo construye.Suscríbete en ritalin.cl/podcast y recibe cada martes los nuevos capítulos directo en tu correo.
Monza amenazaba con ser el gran escaparate de todo lo que no funciona en la Fórmula 1 de 2026. Pero hubo mucho más, tanto, que dejó oculto lo peor de esta temporada para mostrarnos lo mejor. Y de eso queremos hablar esta semana en el primer episodio del Podcast Técnica Fórmula 1. Claro que hubo cosas feas. Rectas larguísimas, poca curva, mucha velocidad punta y el miedo evidente a que el famoso clipping terminara convirtiendo el Gran Premio de Italia en una sucesión de coches quedándose sin energía antes de final de recta. Y algo de eso hubo. Claro que lo hubo. Los coches alcanzaban su velocidad máxima demasiado pronto. La aceleración, en algunos momentos, fue bastante pobre para un circuito como Monza. El Templo de la Velocidad no parecía siempre el templo de la velocidad. Pero, contra lo que se podía temer, el clipping no terminó de arruinar la carrera. La carrera tuvo vida. Y la tuvo, sobre todo, porque Andrea Kimi Antonelli hizo una de esas actuaciones que obligan a mirar dos veces. El italiano ganó en casa saliendo decimonoveno. De 19º a 1º en Monza. La mayor remontada de la historia en este circuito. En su segundo año en Fórmula 1, ante su gente, con la presión de correr en Italia y con el Mundial en juego, Antonelli hizo algo bastante serio. No fue sólo ganar. Fue cómo ganó. Hubo gestión, adelantamientos, lectura de carrera, paciencia y agresividad en el momento justo. Monza no perdona demasiado. Si atacas cuando no toca, te vas largo. Si gastas energía antes de tiempo, te quedas vendido. Si dudas en la frenada, pierdes la oportunidad. Antonelli fue encontrando el equilibrio entre todo eso hasta convertir una carrera que parecía cuesta arriba en una exhibición. Una carrera que “nació rara”. El Gran Premio empezó ya torcido para cualquier guion previsible. Pierre Gasly salía desde la pole, una imagen que nadie esperaba y que dio a la carrera un punto de rareza muy atractivo. Russell se colocó arriba, Leclerc y Hamilton se tocaron en la pelea inicial y el británico cayó hacia atrás. Colapinto llegó a situarse sexto. Verstappen se metió pronto en las luchas. Piastri también apareció. Había carrera. Y luego llegó el golpe de Leclerc. El accidente del Ferrari en la Parabólica, intentando defenderse de Piastri, provocó una bandera roja que cambió el tono del domingo. A partir de ahí, Monza dejó de ser sólo una cuestión de velocidad punta y empezó a ser una carrera de lectura. De entender cuándo atacar, cuándo guardar, cuándo dejar que otro se desgaste y cuándo aprovechar el momento. Antonelli ya era duodécimo en la vuelta 4. Poco después estaba octavo. En la vuelta 7 ya había pasado a Norris. Luego llegaron más adelantamientos, más pelea y esa sensación, cada vez más clara, de que el italiano no estaba simplemente remontando: iba buscando una victoria. No, no es un nuevo Verstappen. La comparación con Verstappen empieza a aparecer demasiado pronto y conviene manejarla con cuidado. No todos los talentos enormes acaban siendo Verstappen. No todos los domingos brillantes anuncian una era. Pero carreras como esta explican por qué Toto Wolff se atreve a pensar en ese tipo de piloto. Antonelli tiene velocidad, sí. Pero empieza a enseñar también algo más difícil: autoridad. El fin de semana dejó otras historias. Gasly perdió el podio de Mónaco por una decisión de la FIA que encendió a Flavio Briatore, siempre dispuesto a convertir una polémica en una escena de ópera. Ferrari tuvo ritmo, pero volvió a quedarse con una sensación de oportunidad perdida. Mercedes salió reforzada, no sólo por el resultado, sino por el golpe emocional de ganar en Italia con un piloto italiano. McLaren estuvo en la pelea, aunque Monza no parecía el lugar más cómodo para medir su mejor versión. Red Bull volvió a vivir de momentos. Aston Martin, por su parte, dejó una imagen mucho peor que en Zandvoort. Fernando Alonso pasó por boxes y abandonó. Después de las señales positivas de las últimas carreras, Monza fue un recordatorio de que el equipo todavía está lejos de tener una base sólida en todos los circuitos. Pero todo eso quedó en segundo plano. La imagen del Gran Premio fue Antonelli subido a lo más alto del podio en Monza. La Fórmula 1 respiró porque la carrera no se rompió por culpa del clipping. No fue una carrera limpia en el sentido purista de la palabra. Hubo gestión artificial, hubo zonas raras y hubo momentos en los que los coches no parecían coches de Fórmula 1 atacando Monza como deberían atacarlo. Pero hubo espectáculo, pelea y emoción. Y, aunque no nos guste mucho esta Fórmula 1 tan artificial, la temporada nos está gustado, y mucho. Antonelli no ganó una carrera cualquiera. Ganó en casa, remontando desde el fondo, en un circuito histórico y en un Mundial que empieza a tener su nombre escrito en letras cada vez más grandes. Es cierto que Monza exagera todo. Esta vez, también exageró la dimensión de Antonelli. O quizá no hizo falta exagerarla demasiado. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals
Recibe cada día una idea, estrategia o reflexión para invertir mejor, y llévate gratis "Los 7 errores que me hubiera gustado conocer antes de empezar a invertir": https://locosdewallstreet.com/7-errores/ Lululemon se ha hundido un 20% tras presentar resultados y cotiza en mínimos de 8 años. Michael Burry, uno de sus mayores accionistas, ha lanzado dos mensajes contradictorios el mismo día: primero diciendo que compraría agresivamente si baja de 100, y horas después reconociendo que le preocupa lo que ha leído en el 10-Q y que la compañía "va para peor". En este resumen semanal también analizamos por qué el mercado está en una calma histórica (el VIX en mínimos no vistos desde 1992), los resultados de Broadcom y Snowflake, la compra masiva de oro por parte de China, la correlación entre Bitcoin y el oro, y la próxima salida a bolsa de Anthropic valorada en 2 billones de dólares. Suscríbete al canal para más resúmenes semanales de mercados. ⚠️ Este vídeo tiene fines exclusivamente educativos y no constituye asesoramiento financiero ni una recomendación de inversión. Invertir en mercados financieros conlleva riesgos, y es posible perder parte o la totalidad del capital invertido. Analiza cualquier inversión por tu cuenta y, si lo consideras necesario, consulta con un asesor financiero certificado por la CNMV antes de tomar cualquier decisión.
Según fuentes del Palacio, una carta ha sido enviada al equipo del príncipe Harry, al gobierno, a los militares y a los lord tenientes, para aclarar el estatus de los duques de Sussex en su regreso a Reino Unido.
CHEGAMOS, TORCIDA DE ELITE! Setembro está aí e em breve teremos bola voando no Lucas oil Stadium para o primeiro confronto da temporada 2026: Baltimore Ravens at Indianapolis Colts!E para falar do lado do rival sobre este confronto, a Casa do Corvo convida Lucas Coppi, do Head Colts e do canal Zona Neutra!E É CLARO... TÁ TODO MUNDO AQUI EMPOLGADO COM O JOGO DO RIO DE JANEIRO!!!!! Seja torcedor de elite e financie este podcast através do apoia.se Você também pode colaborar fazendo uma doação através do PIX: casadocorvobr@gmail.com Entre em contato conosco através das nossas redes sociais: Meta: @casadocorvobrDemais redes: @CasaDoCorvo ENTRE NO NOSSO SERVIDOR DO DISCORD E FAÇA PARTE DA COMUNIDADE MAIS ELITE DE TODAS!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
1409. Los cortes para redes sociales se han convertido en una especie de obligación no escrita para cualquier podcast, pero cada vez tengo más claro que no deberían ocupar el centro de nuestra estrategia. Llevo tiempo pensando en ello y, de hecho, este es uno de esos episodios de opinión que tenía apuntados desde antes de terminar la temporada anterior. La idea empezó por una conversación con un amigo que trabaja en una hamburguesería. Me contaba que veía cómo negocios parecidos al suyo centraban buena parte de su promoción en TikTok, influencers y vídeos cortos pensados para llamar la atención durante unos segundos. Incluso conocía casos donde el plan era montar un local, hacerlo explotar durante dos o tres años gracias a la viralidad, recuperar la inversión, sacar beneficio y pasar a otra cosa. Aquello me hizo pensar que este fenómeno no tiene absolutamente nada de exclusivo del podcasting. Lo veo en hostelería, en contenido sobre running, nutrición, productoras, estudios y prácticamente cualquier sector que tenga algo que vender. Cambia el producto, pero la estrategia se parece bastante: ganchos rápidos, vídeos verticales, mensajes muy directos y la búsqueda de alcance a toda costa. Y ojo, no estoy diciendo que estos formatos no funcionen. Claro que pueden funcionar. El problema aparece cuando empezamos a tratarlos como una condición imprescindible para que un proyecto tenga futuro. En podcasting ya hemos visto ejemplos bastante extremos. Recuerdo aquella época, alrededor de 2023, en la que aparecían cortes muy polémicos de supuestos podcasts que ni siquiera existían. Primero se buscaba el ruido, la discusión y las visualizaciones; si aquello funcionaba, entonces ya se construía el podcast detrás. Por eso me preocupa que acabemos dedicando más tiempo a fabricar el envoltorio que al contenido que realmente queremos ofrecer. Hacer reels, shorts o TikToks puede exigir grabación en vídeo, edición adicional, subtítulos, selección de momentos, diseño y publicación. Todo eso suma horas y dinero. Si tienes recursos y te funciona, perfecto. Pero si ese trabajo termina agotándote o haciendo que descuides el propio podcast, quizás convenga revisar las prioridades. Además, las plataformas tienen bastante interés en convencernos de que necesitamos producir constantemente este tipo de piezas. Hoy son los vídeos verticales; mañana seguramente será otra cosa. Las redes cambian, sus algoritmos también y lo que ahora parece obligatorio puede dejar de serlo dentro de unos meses. Mi conclusión es bastante sencilla: quiero que el podcast siga siendo el centro. Si después puedo sacar buenos cortes para redes sociales y utilizarlos para atraer a alguien nuevo, estupendo. Pero no quiero construir un proyecto entero alrededor de la promesa de hacerse viral. Prefiero trabajar en contenidos que tengan sentido, que puedan mantenerse en el tiempo y que no dependan de acertar cada semana con el próximo vídeo de treinta segundos.¿Y tú? ¿Qué opinas? Espero vuestros comentarios en las diferentes plataformas o a través del canal de Telegram t.me/alotroladodelmicrofono_____________ ¡Gracias por pasarte 'Al otro lado del micrófono' un día más para seguir aprendiendo sobre podcasting! Si quieres descubrir cómo puedes unirte a la comunidad o a los diferentes canales donde está presente este podcast, te invito a visitar https://alotroladodelmicrofono.com/unete Además, puedes apoyar el proyecto mediante un pequeño impulso mensual, desde un granito de café mensual hasta un brunch digital. Descubre las diferentes opciones entrando en: https://alotroladodelmicrofono.com/cafe. También puedes apoyar el proyecto a través de tus compras en Amazon mediante mi enlace de afiliados https://alotroladodelmicrofono.com/amazon La voz que puedes escuchar en la intro del podcast es de Juan Navarro Torelló (PoniendoVoces) y el diseño visual es de Antonio Poveda. La dirección, grabación y locución corre a cargo de Jorge Marín. La sintonía que puedes escuchar en cada capítulo ha sido creada por Jason Show y se titula: 2 Above Zero. 'Al otro lado del micrófono' es una creación de EOVE Productora.
O dia que virei uma putinha de um casal no Motel em que eu trabalhava. Era aniversário de casamento de um casal que sempre frequentava esse motel, e no dia eles me convidaram para brindar com eles. Claro que no fim o que eles queriam um presente de aniversário, e o presente fui eu!E você já viveu uma grande aventura, como essa?Aperta o play e sinta a temperatura subir: @ouveamalu
Claro que vamos a hablar de esos 26 minutos que vimos de GTA VI, igual que el documental que tiene el mundo sin aire, lo que Xbox está planeando, y nuestra reseña semanal de Lanterns. RESEÑAS GTA VI en Netflix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJbzMqJGH4k La Mujer del Pastor NOTICIAS Ridley Scott quiere morir haciendo otra Alien: https://deadline.com/2026/08/ridley-scott-alien-covenant-sequel-michael-fassbender-ai-1237062286/ Xbox tendrá "Familia de equipos" https://www.ign.com/articles/xbox-ceo-says-project-helix-includes-a-family-of-devices Tom Cruise hace lo que le da la gana: https://x.com/TomCruise/status/2093744345396695105?s=20 La serie de Robocop ya empezó mal: https://deadline.com/2026/08/dan-stevens-cast-robocop-prime-video-series-1237049398/ Segundo episodio de LANTERNS
Claro que sí y lo demostramos en directo. En este episodio, Laura la directora de Let's Speak English se pone delante del micrófono mientras hace una tortilla española de verdad. Y mientras cocina, Robbie V enseña el vocabulario y las expresiones en inglés que necesitas para hablar de comida y cocina como un nativo. Inglés real, situaciones reales, y una tortilla de por medio. Así es como se aprende. En este episodio: Vocabulario esencial de comida y bebida en inglés Expresiones reales de cocina que no te enseñan en clase Inglés natural a través de una conversación real con Laura Evento online gratuito en Zoom — 3 de septiembre "Cómo perder el miedo y hablar inglés con autoridad" Si entiendes el inglés pero te bloqueas cuando tienes que hablarlo este evento es para ti. Es gratuito. Es en directo. Y las plazas son limitadas. Haz clic en el enlace y reserva tu plaza ahora https://letsspeakenglish.es/evento-sin-miedo/
¿Podemos quedar tristes y enojadas después de la ruptura con una amiga? Claro que sí. De esto hablamos con Javi Boggio, un escorpiano. Yo soy ascendente en Escorpio, así que soltar fácilmente tampoco es lo mío. .."Hola amiga" está disponible en Argentina y Uruguay. En el resto del mundo, pedilo a Buscalibre o Librenta. También en ebook. En Argentina, podés conseguir el libro acá:https://lugaitan.com/tienda/.."Notas de vos", el libro de Javi Boggio, está disponible en este enlace https://rose-ardra-72.tiiny.site/..¡Gracias!
Rodrigo de Gusmao, presidente de Claro Colombia by Diario La república
Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-mananero-radio--3086101/support.
Fluent Fiction - Spanish: The Accidental Tango: Laughter and Friendship at La Vida en Rosa Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/es/episode/2026-08-25-07-38-20-es Story Transcript:Es: En una esquina del barrio de Palermo, en Buenos Aires, se encontraba un pequeño café llamado "La Vida en Rosa".En: On a corner in the neighborhood of Palermo, in Buenos Aires, there was a small café called "La Vida en Rosa".Es: Adentro, el aroma de café recién hecho llenaba el ambiente.En: Inside, the aroma of freshly made coffee filled the air.Es: La suave melodía de un tango se deslizaba por el aire, entre las mesas llenas de charlas y risas.En: The soft melody of a tango drifted through the air, among tables full of conversations and laughter.Es: Elena, sentada junto a su amigo Mateo, estaba emocionada.En: Elena, sitting next to her friend Mateo, was excited.Es: Su mente soñadora había malinterpretado un anuncio en la puerta del café.En: Her dreamy mind had misinterpreted a sign on the café door.Es: Creía que habría una competencia de tango esa tarde.En: She believed there would be a tango competition that afternoon.Es: Elena, amante del baile aunque no muy talentosa, decidió que debía participar y ganar.En: Elena, a lover of dance although not very talented, decided she must participate and win.Es: —Mateo, hoy es mi día —dijo Elena, tamborileando los dedos con entusiasmo sobre la mesa.En: "Mateo, today is my day," said Elena, drumming her fingers enthusiastically on the table.Es: Mateo, con una ligera sonrisa escéptica, la animó a su manera:—Claro, Elena.En: Mateo, with a slightly skeptical smile, encouraged her in his own way: "Of course, Elena.Es: Será.En: It will be...Es: interesante.En: interesting."Es: Sergio, el dueño del café, era un hombre carismático al que le encantaban las actividades comunitarias.En: Sergio, the café owner, was a charismatic man who loved community activities.Es: Había organizado una simple reunión de amigos para disfrutar del tango.En: He had organized a simple gathering of friends to enjoy the tango.Es: Al ver la determinación en los ojos de Elena, decidió no desilusionarla todavía.En: Seeing the determination in Elena's eyes, he decided not to disappoint her just yet.Es: Elena, convencida de que debía practicar, se levantó de su asiento y comenzó a moverse al ritmo de la música.En: Elena, convinced she needed to practice, got up from her seat and began to move to the rhythm of the music.Es: Su paso inseguro la llevó a girar entre las mesas, sus movimientos más valientes que su habilidad.En: Her unsure steps led her to twirl among the tables, her movements bolder than her skill.Es: Los otros clientes observaban con curiosidad y diversión.En: The other patrons watched with curiosity and amusement.Es: Con cada paso, Elena se perdía más en su entusiasmo.En: With each step, Elena got lost more in her enthusiasm.Es: De repente, una de sus vueltas la llevó directo a una mesa.En: Suddenly, one of her turns led her straight to a table.Es: Golpeó una taza de café, y como un efecto dominó, cada una de las tazas en la mesa volcó sobre las siguientes.En: She knocked over a cup of coffee, and like a domino effect, each of the cups on the table toppled onto the next.Es: Sergio, viendo la escena, se apresuró.En: Sergio, seeing the scene, hurried over.Es: Los clientes rompieron en carcajadas.En: The customers burst into laughter.Es: Elena, con las mejillas encendidas de vergüenza, detuvo su danza.En: Elena, with cheeks burning with embarrassment, stopped her dance.Es: Mateo se acercó a ella, sonriendo:—¡Lo hiciste, Elena!En: Mateo approached her, smiling: "You did it, Elena!Es: ¡Tu tango fue un éxito rotundo!En: Your tango was a resounding success!"Es: Elena, contagiada por las risas, también comenzó a reír.En: Elena, caught up in the laughter, began to laugh too.Es: Sergio, con una mirada comprensiva, le explicó:—No hay competencia, Elena, solo queríamos disfrutar del tango en compañía.En: Sergio, with an understanding look, explained to her: "There's no competition, Elena, we just wanted to enjoy the tango in company."Es: Elena, riendo de buena gana, aceptó su error.En: Elena, laughing heartily, accepted her mistake.Es: Decidió que a veces está bien no tomarse las cosas tan en serio.En: She decided that sometimes it's okay not to take things too seriously.Es: A pesar del pequeño desastre, había logrado hacer reír a todos, incluyéndose a sí misma.En: Despite the small disaster, she had managed to make everyone laugh, including herself.Es: El café "La Vida en Rosa" volvió a llenarse del sonido alegre del tango, mientras Elena y Mateo regresaban a su mesa, más amigos que nunca.En: The café "La Vida en Rosa" filled once again with the joyful sound of tango, as Elena and Mateo returned to their table, closer friends than ever.Es: La tarde de invierno continuó, cálida y llena de sonrisas, en el rincón más amigable de Buenos Aires.En: The winter afternoon continued, warm and full of smiles, in the friendliest corner of Buenos Aires. Vocabulary Words:corner: la esquinaneighborhood: el barriocafé: el caféaroma: el aromamelody: la melodíaconversation: la charlalaughter: la risamind: la mentesign: el anunciodoor: la puertacompetition: la competencialover: el/la amantefingers: los dedosway: la maneraowner: el dueñogathering: la reunióneyes: los ojosdesire: el deseoseat: el asientorhythm: el ritmosteps: los pasospatrons: los clientestable: la mesacup: la tazadomino effect: el efecto dominóscene: la escenacheeks: las mejillasunderstanding: la comprensiónmistake: el errordisaster: el desastre
Si estás en una etapa de cambios hormonales y sientes que últimamente te cuesta más sentirte ligera, fit y a gusto en tu cuerpo, este episodio es para ti. Quiero compartirte 4 errores que podemos cometer sin darnos cuenta y que pueden hacer esta etapa mucho más difícil. Porque sí, nuestros cuerpos cambian. Sí, nuestras hormonas cambian. Pero hay una gran diferencia entre vivir una etapa de cambios hormonales y convertirlos en la explicación de absolutamente todo lo que nos pasa. Error #1: Convertir esta etapa en tu enemiga. Durante años hemos escuchado que la menopausia es terrible, que después de cierta edad todo cambia y que ya no bajas igual. Sin darnos cuenta podemos llegar a esta etapa con una historia ya escrita. No estoy diciendo que no existan síntomas reales. Claro que existen. Pero además de lo que sucede físicamente, existe la historia con la que lo interpretamos. Tal vez esto no tiene que ser una guerra. Error #2: No darle a la comida su justo valor. Podemos irnos a dos extremos: querer comer perfecto, cero azúcar, cero carbohidratos, todo limpio y controlado; o pensar que da igual lo que comamos porque "son las hormonas". La comida importa, pero no lo es todo. También nos alimentan el descanso, el movimiento, las relaciones, la vida espiritual, el propósito y nuestros pensamientos. La invitación es observarnos, escucharnos y aprender de nuestro cuerpo. Error #3: Culpar a las hormonas de todo. Esta etapa coincide con muchos cambios de vida: los hijos crecen, nuestros padres envejecen, cambian la pareja, el trabajo, las prioridades y la rutina. Todo eso también nos afecta. Tal vez sí hay un componente hormonal, pero también puede haber estrés, falta de sueño, más alcohol o demasiadas cosas pasando al mismo tiempo. En lugar de meterlo todo en la bolsa de "menopausia", separa. ¿Qué está pasando realmente? ¿Qué parte es física? ¿Qué parte tiene que ver con tu estilo de vida? ¿Qué sí puedes atender? Error #4: Aguantar tus síntomas en lugar de atenderlos. Aceptar que tu cuerpo cambia no significa resignarte a sentirte mal. Atiende síntoma por síntoma. Si son bochornos, atiéndelos. Si es el sueño, atiéndelo. Si necesitas evaluación médica, haz tu cita, pregunta, da seguimiento, prueba lo que tú y tus profesionales consideren adecuado para ti, observa y ajusta. Yo misma he visto que cuando estoy especialmente estresada, consumo más alcohol de lo habitual o duermo tarde, noto diferencias en cómo me siento. Entonces cuido esas áreas desde la observación, no desde el miedo. Y quiero ser muy clara: nada de esto sustituye tus visitas al médico ni el acompañamiento de profesionales de la salud. Benditos médicos. Haz tus revisiones, pregunta, infórmate y sigue el tratamiento que consideres adecuado junto con profesionales en quienes confíes. Pero hay una parte que le corresponde a tus médicos y otra parte que ningún médico puede hacer por ti: observar qué te estás diciendo, cómo te relacionas con tu cuerpo, escuchar tu hambre, dormir, poner límites, trabajar tus pensamientos y atender tu estrés, tus relaciones, tu movimiento y tu alimentación. Esa parte te toca a ti. Y eso significa que hay mucho que sí está en tus manos. No necesitas pelear contra tus hormonas. Necesitas aprender a acompañar al cuerpo que tienes hoy, conocerlo, escucharlo, atenderlo y seguir creando tu mejor versión desde la mujer que eres hoy. Y precisamente esto es lo que vamos a trabajar durante septiembre dentro de Mi Mejor Versión: sentirnos FIT en esta época de cambios hormonales, trabajando mentalidad, alimentación, estilo de vida y herramientas simples para escucharnos y atender lo que hoy necesita nuestra atención. Si esto es exactamente lo que necesitas trabajar, únete a Mi Mejor Versión: www.monicasosa.com/mimejorversion Con mi cariño, Tu coach Mónica
El primer ministro Benjamin Netanyahu ha recibido a Jared Kushner, yerno de Donald Trump y uno de sus enviados especiales para el conflicto de Gaza. Sobre la mesa del encuentro, la negativa expresada recientemente por el ejecutivo israelí a aceptar el plan de paz de Trump para la Franja, con el argumento de que Israel no puede aceptar ningún plan mientras Hamas no se desarme completamente antes.Hoy Netanyahu ha vuelto a reiterar su postura ante Kushner aunque fuentes de la propia junta de paz dicen que ha sido una reunión productiva y que ha habido avances. El presidente estadounidense ha dicho que va a reducir la participación de sus fuerzas en ejercicios militares con Corea del Sur mientras publica una foto suya con el líder norcoreano Kim Jong Un.Ponemos el foco en las amenazas híbridas y repasamos también el papel actual del formato documental en un año en el que Documentos TV de TVE ha cumplido 40 años desde su primera emisión.Hablaremos de la condena contra el líder de uno de los pocos partidos políticos rusos opuestos a la guerra de Ucrania.También de migración, de como Senegal y Gambia tratan de redibujar su frontera, herencia colonial, o de un triste aniversario en Filipinas.Escuchar audio
Revelamos nuestros procesos detrás de cámaras en el reality Claro Que Baila y como nos acoplamos para llevar nuestras celebridades a lo mas alto en la competencia.
Inscríbete aquí al próximo Seminario Creando Riqueza de Alejandro Cardona y aprende a invertir en la bolsa de valores. CLICK AQUÍ
Daniel Muñoz entrevista a Dolors Montserrat, secretaria general del PPE, sobre la forma en que Bruselas ve a Sánchez tras lo ocurrido en Ceuta.
Claro. Te dejo una descripción que presenta el episodio como educativo y accesible, destacando nutrición, ejercicio y prevención.
Mindy Diamond on Independence: A Podcast for Financial Advisors Considering Change
Ryan Belanger — Founder & CEO, Claro Advisors Most firms are adding AI to existing workflows. Ryan Belanger chose a different path, acquiring a fintech company and rebuilding Claro Advisors around an AI-native platform. He explains why he believes the future belongs to firms that rethink how they operate, not just the tools they use. In Summary Most firms view AI as another technology investment. Ryan Belanger sees it as a business strategy. Louis sits down with the Founder & CEO of Claro Advisors to discuss why his $1.5 billion RIA acquired a fintech company, built an AI-native operating platform, and believes the firms that gain the biggest advantage won't simply adopt new technology—they'll rethink how their businesses are built. The conversation also explores the broader philosophy behind that decision. Ryan shares why he's consistently chosen unconventional paths—from recruiting younger advisors and embracing a partnership model built around ownership to investing in proprietary technology instead of relying on third-party solutions. For advisors, the bigger question isn't simply how AI will change their workflow. It's how it may change what it takes to build a durable, differentiated advisory firm. The Storyline Every generation of wealth management has been shaped by a different competitive advantage. For some, independence paved the way to build unique branding and a bespoke client experience. Inorganic growth and M&A gave many firms access to scale and growth. Today, many believe the next advantage will come from artificial intelligence. But simply adopting AI may not be enough. Ryan Belanger has spent his career challenging conventional thinking. He left Morgan Stanley in 2012, well before independence became mainstream. He built Claro Advisors by investing in younger advisors instead of competing for established producers. He embraced a partnership model centered on advisor ownership rather than restrictive employment structures. And when AI began reshaping the industry, he made another unconventional decision: instead of licensing another technology platform, Claro acquired a fintech company and built its own AI-native operating system. Louis explores the reasoning behind each decision and the philosophy that connects them. Ryan explains why he believes proprietary technology will become a defining competitive advantage, how Claro's AI platform, Claire, is changing advisor workflows, and why the biggest opportunity isn't replacing advisors; it's giving them more time to do the work clients value most. The conversation also tackles practical questions facing every advisory firm: how to integrate AI responsibly, where human judgment continues to matter most, and why the firms best positioned for the future may be the ones willing to redesign their businesses instead of simply adding another layer of technology. Topics Covered AI-native advisory firms Acquiring a fintech versus licensing technology Building proprietary advisor technology Advisor productivity and workflow automation Recruiting and developing younger advisors 1099 partnership model and advisor autonomy Enterprise building and long-term differentiation AI governance and advisor trust The future of wealth management technology > Download a transcript of this episode… Listen and Learn Highlights for Advisors Why did Ryan launch independently long before it became common? (7:30) Ryan explains why leaving Morgan Stanley in 2012 wasn't simply about independence—it was about creating a better business model while betting on himself. Why recruit emerging advisors instead of established producers? (15:00) Ryan shares why investing in younger advisors has become one of Claro's greatest competitive advantages and succession strategies. Why would an RIA buy a technology company? (23:45) Rather than licensing another platform, Ryan explains why Claro acquired NDVR to build proprietary technology that could fundamentally change advisor workflows. How does Claire actually help advisors day-to-day? (33:00) From meeting preparation and client follow-up to portfolio management and workflow automation, Ryan walks through how AI is saving advisors meaningful time. Will AI replace advisors—or make them better? (36:30) Ryan discusses where AI belongs, where human advice remains essential, and why he believes technology should enhance – not replace – the advisor relationship. What does the advisory firm of the future look like? (38:20) Ryan shares his long-term view of how AI, proprietary technology, and advisor expectations will reshape wealth management over the next decade. Key Takeaways Ryan believes firms that build AI into the foundation of their businesses will create greater long-term differentiation than those simply adding new software. Claro's acquisition of a fintech company reflects a strategy of owning core technology rather than relying exclusively on third-party vendors. AI is most valuable when it eliminates administrative work, allowing advisors to spend more time serving clients. Recruiting younger advisors and investing in long-term talent has become a defining part of Claro's growth strategy. Advisor autonomy, equity participation, and technology can create stronger retention than restrictive employment models. Human relationships remain central to wealth management, even as AI becomes increasingly capable. The firms that adapt fastest may be those willing to rethink their operating model—not just their technology stack. https://youtu.be/7XvSXi0PzXI Quotable Moments “I wanted to build something that was integrated instead of just layering another tool on top.” “We're trying to make really good advisors become super advisors.” “Clients still want advice from a person—but they're going to expect that person to know how to use AI.” “The firms that win won't necessarily be the ones using the most technology. They'll be the ones building differently.” FAQs Why did Claro Advisors acquire a fintech company? Ryan believed owning proprietary technology would create greater long-term differentiation than licensing another collection of third-party tools. What is Claire by Claro? Claire is Claro Advisors' AI-powered chief of staff, designed to automate advisor workflows, prepare meetings, organize client information, and streamline operational tasks. How is Claro using AI differently than many RIAs? Rather than layering AI onto multiple disconnected applications, Claro built an integrated operating platform where AI has access to the advisor's workflow, planning, portfolio, and client information. Will AI replace financial advisors? Ryan believes AI will automate much of the administrative work advisors perform today, but that clients—particularly those with more complex needs—will continue to value human advice and relationships. How does Claro recruit advisors? The firm emphasizes advisor ownership, partnership, equity participation, technology, and operational support instead of relying primarily on acquisition-based recruiting models. What does Ryan believe will differentiate advisory firms in the future? He believes proprietary technology, integrated AI, and the ability to improve advisor productivity will become increasingly important competitive advantages. Ryan believed owning proprietary technology would create greater long-term differentiation than licensing another collection of third-party tools. Claire is Claro Advisors' AI-powered chief of staff, designed to automate advisor workflows, prepare meetings, organize client information, and streamline operational tasks. Rather than layering AI onto multiple disconnected applications, Claro built an integrated operating platform where AI has access to the advisor's workflow, planning, portfolio, and client information. Ryan believes AI will automate much of the administrative work advisors perform today, but that clients—particularly those with more complex needs—will continue to value human advice and relationships. The firm emphasizes advisor ownership, partnership, equity participation, technology, and operational support instead of relying primarily on acquisition-based recruiting models. He believes proprietary technology, integrated AI, and the ability to improve advisor productivity will become increasingly important competitive advantages. Related Resources Why AI Matters Now: Filling the Estate Planning Gap with Wealth.com Emotional Intelligence: The “Untouchable” Differentiator in an AI World Diamond Consultants Annual Advisor Transition Report Ryan BelangerChief Executive Officer & Founder Ryan founded Claro Advisors in 2012 after seven years at Morgan Stanley. He named the company after a Latin phrase “to make clear in the mind.” All Claro advisors strive to give their clients clarity and transparency, core tenants of the firm. Claro is continuously recognized within industry for its growth and thought leadership. In 2004, Ryan received a BA in Economics from The College of the Holy Cross and in 2009, he earned the Certified Financial Planner™ distinction. He is most proud of his philanthropic activity. Along with his wife Rachel, they started a foundation that raises money for genetic research in the name of their late daughter, Bella. Their focus is on extreme rare disease. Ryan resides in Boston’s Back Bay with his wife Rachel and their three children. He enjoys exercising, golfing, reading and spending time with his family. He has been featured in numerous magazines and industry publications and is regularly on television sharing his market thoughts. NOTE: The views and opinions expressed by the guests on this podcast are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Diamond Consultants. Neither Diamond Consultants nor the guests on this podcast are compensated in any way for their participation. View the transcript of this episode… Why AI Matters Now: How a $1.5B RIA is Building the Firm of the Future A conversation with Louis Diamond and Ryan Belanger, Founder & CEO of Claro Advisors. Louis Diamond: Welcome to the latest episode of our podcast series for financial advisors. Today’s episode is Why AI Matters Now: How a $1.5B RIA is Building the Firm of the Future. It’s a conversation with Ryan Belanger, the Founder and CEO of Claro Advisors. I’m Louis Diamond, and this is the Diamond Podcast for Financial Advisors. Mindy Diamond: At Diamond Consultants, we help elite advisors identify the right environment for their businesses to thrive, whether that’s at a wirehouse, boutique, or independent firm. With nearly three decades of experience, we’ve guided thousands of advisors and represented more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in assets transitioned. And each year, one in four advisors managing a billion dollars or more who change firms are our clients. Our process is education driven, and based on building relationships, starting as your strategic partner well before you’re even thinking of a move. To schedule a confidential conversation, call us at (908) 879-1002. Wondering why advisors change firms and where they’re headed? Are transition deals going up or down? Those very questions and more inspired us to create our annual Advisor Transition Report. It’s the award-winning data-driven resource designed for advisors that connects the dots between the motivations around movement and the firm’s appetite for top talent. Arm yourself with the knowledge you need to make smart decisions. Download your copy at diamond-consultants.com/transitionreport. Louis Diamond: Artificial intelligence has quickly become one of the biggest topics in wealth management in the world. Almost every firm is experimenting with new tools, looking for ways to automate tasks, improve efficiency, or help advisors serve clients more effectively. But what if AI isn’t just another technology to plug into your business? What if it becomes the foundation for how your business is built? That’s exactly why I wanted to have Ryan Belanger on the show. Ryan is the Founder and CEO of Claro Advisors, a billion and a half dollar RIA that’s taken a very different path than most firms in the industry. Rather than simply adding AI to an existing tech stack, Claro acquired a FinTech company and is building its own AI native operating system designed specifically for advisors. What’s interesting is that this isn’t really a conversation about software, it’s about strategy. Ryan has consistently gone against the grain from leaving Morgan Stanley to launch an independent firm in 2012 before it became commonplace, to recruiting younger advisors when others chased established producers, to betting that proprietary technology will become one of the biggest competitive advantages an advisory firm can have. If AI is going to reshape wealth management, and I think it will, the firms that benefit most may not be the ones using the most tools. They may be the ones rethinking how the entire business operates. Ryan shares what that looks like in practice, what he’s seeing from advisors today, and why he believes the next generation of advisory firms will look fundamentally different from the firms we’ve known over the last two decades. There’s a lot to cover, so let’s get to it. Ryan, thanks for joining us today. Ryan Belanger: Yeah, nice to see you. Louis Diamond: You too, good to see you again. For those who aren’t familiar with you and your firm Claro, why don’t you walk us through your background and how you found your way into the industry to set the table. Ryan Belanger: Yeah, sounds good. So background was after college, I got a job at Morgan Stanley. I’d done an internship while in college and that gentleman, Morgan Dewey, said you should look at the Morgan Stanley. So I applied, got a job immediately, and just a couple weeks after graduating, I began as a financial advisor in a training program at Morgan Stanley and spent a good amount of time there and was able to develop skills necessary that really I had all along just growing up, a lot of entrepreneurial spirit I think is important in this business, how to relate to people, some competitiveness. I just happened to luck out and get into a profession that rewarded some of those skill sets. Louis Diamond: I’d say it was the right choice for you. So I think you started at Morgan Stanley in 2004. You were 21, 22 years old, just cutting your teeth, but the financial crisis happens a handful of years later. So what was it like being a relative newbie and seeing client accounts falling, the world crumbling every day? What did living through that crash teach you that’s shaped how you’ve built your business or serve clients now? Ryan Belanger: I did learn a tremendous amount at Morgan Stanley and I do still tell people if they’re looking to start at a big shop with big training programs and resources and really try to figure out what you like and then you can go off and get more specialized. But I do feel like it was a great place to get trained. They would post how many cold calls we were making every day. So on the board every morning you’d walk in and say, “Okay, where did you fall?” And I’m a competitive person, and I just want to make sure I was first every single day. So it was those type of things that really propelled me to keep interested in this business but also see the benefits. It’s really hard to get clients and that’s what people underestimate the most is to build the level of trust with someone that they’ll allow you to manage their retirement nest egg is it takes time. And I was 22, I looked really young, I had no experience, but I was fortunate to have two great mentors at Morgan Stanley, a gentleman named Todd Wetzel. He was brilliant at developing relationships, really caring for people. And then the gentleman that I had done an internship with went to Morgan Stanley as well, and he allowed me to work on some small accounts and really cut my teeth with some customers. And I was very fortunate to have done that, but you’d asked about the crash, and I think what I learned from that when people were literally weeping when their account values were down by 50%, 60% was that money is really emotional, and you have to understand how much it means to people, it’s not just the number on your screen. So having some empathy towards someone who’s really in a period of distress is now a critical skill that those of us have been around for this long understand. And there’s a whole generation, Louis, of advisors that have never experienced a real bear market, and I do fear for them at some point because when you go through that, it really changes the perspective that you have. But for me, it happened, I was four or five years into the business at that point, so I’m thankful that it happened just for my own personal development and I’ll never forget it. Louis Diamond: Yeah. Things have a way of happening for a reason and then the best advisors, best humans, they learn from them, and they’re better off for it. You’re very much right. I like that perspective about how the empathy around the emotions of money was something that you still carry and wear as a badge of honor today. So you left Morgan Stanley in 2012. I think you were 30 years old I read. One, that’s very young to consider leaving a firm like that nonetheless to go independent when in 2012, it wasn’t like everyone was going independent. There weren’t as many infrastructure providers or tech vendors or as much capital available as there is today. It definitely wasn’t a path that was as well-worn as it was. So two-part question, what pushed you to leave the firm presumably without a huge book of business? And second part, how’d you think about risk and reward at that age? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, what drove me was ultimately I felt like I was not seeing the value from the firm I was at, Morgan Stanley at the time. They were just taking an exorbitant amount of the revenue I felt. And I would see product managers strolling through and going to steak dinners, and I’m thinking, geez, I’m here every night on weekends. I’m busting my butt, and I should be creating more value to myself. And so that was one kind of thing. And I think there was a right level of naivete just to think that I could pull this off. I did believe that I had a small number of clients. I was hopeful that they would come because I had to hit a minimum for the custodian platform to start the RIA, which I was able to do. But I felt that they would come with me and that I had developed enough trust with them that I could be their advisor for a long time. And so for me, it felt like the technology wasn’t great. I was just told the mother-in-law is an expression. She says to my kids sometimes, “You get what you get and you don’t get upset.” Have you heard that expression? Louis Diamond: I have. My daughter reads a book where that line is repeated frequently. Ryan Belanger: Yeah, okay. So that’s how I felt then. I was like, “This is what you have and deal with it.” And to me, it just felt like there had to be a better way, but I didn’t have any capital backing, so I bootstrapped it. I Craigslisted an office from an estate planning attorney. I cold called Fidelity at the time they were our only custodian. I called to get some compliance help and I just thought that there’d be other people that would want to join. I named the firm, it’s a Latin phrase, it’s Claro Advisors, and it means to make clear in the mind. And I felt like not only was I trying to do that for clients, but I was trying to push advisors to challenge the norms here. There are other solutions out there. So I purposefully did put my name on it, I knew that there’d be other people that might feel the same way. I’ve always been a team sport guy. I like being around other people and collaborating. And I did have a good friend and credit to him. He said, “If you put this together, I’ll come with you.” And so just a couple weeks after I did, we talked and I said, “It’s up and running.” He came and Dana was our first, he’s still with us. And then a couple of months later, another guy I used to work with called and said, “Hey, I’m at this bank, and it looks like what you’ve done is interesting.” And I said, “We like it if you’d like to give it a try.” And so he came, his name’s Mike. He’s still with us. And so teams started to get put together. But I met someone in 2014, so I was two years in at that point and I was doing legitimately everything, not only as an advisor, but just all the stuff that you have to do to run the business. And it was becoming too much, especially the compliance. And I think nowadays starting an RIA, the threshold is so much higher. That’s why you see better than anyone else. You just see a lot more tuck-ins. But Jen Street was someone that I met and she really allowed me to catapult the business and scale it, so she took over all the operations and compliance and that really freed me up to be an advisor. And I really was just an advisor moonlighting as someone running. I would recruit a little bit or just be introductions, very soft. All that has changed based on what we’ve done in the last couple of years. Louis Diamond: Amazing. So thinking about risk spectrum, obviously now if you look back and say, “Hey, I had 30 million or whatever it was, I didn’t have anything to lose.” Right? But when you’re in it and you had income, you had recurring revenue, you had a paycheck versus the dynamic of, “I’m going to incur a bunch of expenses. I’m not positive who’s going to come with me. I’m not going to have a paycheck for a period of time.” Did the fact that your business was relatively small and you were just getting up and running, do you think it made it easier for you to reconcile that risk, or in some ways it was harder because your dispersion, if someone didn’t come, was that much higher? Ryan Belanger: I think it was easier for me, I knew I could always go to another firm. They would take me and whatever clients I had. I did it at a time when I had little personal risk, no kids, no mortgage. I didn’t have a wife at that point. So for me, it felt like the right time to take a risk. And I had been entrepreneurial in my life. I mean, I had a business in high school and my parents and grandparents were entrepreneurial. So that was in me, even if I didn’t really recognize it, was that I was okay with a good level of risk. And I do say this now to anyone that I’m hoping to partner with is that if you want to bet on yourself, I’ll go all in on you too. But you’ve got to be able to take that jump. I won’t let you fail, but you’ve got to be the one. I think that inertia is what a lot of advisors are like, “Geez, I don’t know, I got to give something up.” And that’s why the data’s important and you have all the data. The clients overwhelmingly go with the advisor. These days it’s just much harder to try to establish a new relationship with a trusted advisor than it is to just DocuSign some forms and move your account somewhere. So to me, it’s just trying to support people, and really push them to the edge and say, “No, this is possible. You should definitely explore this.” And I get it’s totally different, and you might be at a different life stage, but you know the numbers. I mean, tens of thousands of advisors are moving every year and not all of them have a small book like I did when I did it. Louis Diamond: Right, exactly. On one hand, making this entrepreneurial move as early in your career as you did, it was a benefit, right? Because you didn’t have as much to lose, like you said, the stage of life you’re in allowed you to absorb more risk. On the other end of the spectrum, if someone who has a massive business with immense value, they’re well situated financially, maybe their kids are through college, et cetera. And then most people are somewhere in the middle. So it’s interesting hearing that dynamic in real time. Let’s talk about Claro today. So you launched the business, like you said, you had to work hard to meet a minimum custodial threshold. So started from a very small base in 2012, but where is it today as far as assets, team size? Just give us some stats or perspective on what you’ve built in the last decade and a half or so. Ryan Belanger: Yeah, sure. So we enjoyed a tremendous amount of organic growth, Louis. We are not capital-backed. We don’t buy books of businesses, so I would recruit or partner with advisors that were coming from all the various places that you could think of that were finding us to be a very friendly place to work where you had a high level of autonomy, freedom, control, just great economics. We stayed out of people’s ways. We were just good people trying to help other good people, and it was just that friendly environment that allowed us to grow. And of course, we can’t discount market. I think markets had a tremendous growth for everybody in the business. And so the business as it stands right now, we’re about 1.5 billion in assets, 15 to 20 advisors. We got a 40-person team based primarily at a Boston headquarter, but we have advisors all over. And I think as we’ll get to, we’ve just gone through a really exciting new chapter for us where the next 15 years are going to look a lot different than the previous 15 years. Louis Diamond: Very cool. That’s amazing, and I’m in the recruiting businesses and doing recruiting yourself, it’s not easy to tell your story, get in front of the right people, the right like-minded people too, who are willing to take the leap to you, especially if you don’t have the capital backing and you can’t pay big deals or write big checks like others could, so that’s a massive testament to you and your vision. I know the average age of an advisor at Claro is around 40, yet the average advisor in the industry is 59, 60, 61, depending upon what data source you look at. What do you think you figured out about attracting, training, and really cultivating younger advisors that the rest of the industry either gets wrong or ignores? What’s been your hack in that regard? Ryan Belanger: I’ll just take a chance on people that others might not. And typically what that really means is someone with nothing, I’ll make them a deal and I’ll say, “Look, I believe in you. I think you’d be a great advisor. Let’s work on an arrangement where you feel like you can do this and I’ll support you.” And so our specialty was growing advisors from 20 million or 30 million into hundreds of million of client assets. And some of it was just being willing to look where others wouldn’t possibly want to spend their time. But when I was 22, someone took a chance on me, and so I owe it to the next generation to do that as well because there’s some great talent out there that really just isn’t getting the attention they deserve because they don’t have big books of business yet. But one of my core values is long-term thinking, and so that’s the way I frame my decisions is it doesn’t have to be a win today, but it can be a championship tomorrow or down three or five years from now. And so that’s how I’ve positioned it. I think that’s why we tend to get younger advisors. And then what happens when you get a lot of younger advisors, you have some older advisors say, “Hey, look, that’s an attractive bench of talent. I needed a succession plan. You guys seem to have a bunch of guys and gals that know how to do really great work and serve clients.” But I think that’s probably one of the things that I just was willing to take some chances on people at an earlier stage. Louis Diamond: Yep. I love it. I mean, once again, you said in the beginning, you developed an empathy for the emotional side of money and what people were going through that you carry through to this day. So not losing touch with the fact that you started. I mean, everyone starts in this business at some time, but I feel like once you’re successful or you’re through the first few years, you forget what it was like to be a newbie. So keeping that perspective and appreciation for the mentors you had, et cetera, is great. And honestly, from a business building standpoint, to me in this environment, unless you take on private equity capital, or you have capital from a BD or from a wirehouse behind you for recruiting, it’s really hard to win advisors with large books of business. So going in the blue part of the ocean instead of the red ocean, if anyone’s read that book, is very smart, looking under rocks that others don’t or really buying into or leaning into folks that you see something in that you know you can cultivate is a brilliant way. And it’s honestly more scalable, cheaper, you build a better business as well doing it the way that you do, but still, it’s hard. And my guess is the ROI is shorter. I’m sure you’ve made some hires that don’t pan out. So you have to have the tolerance and the demeanor to really invest in people. So long-winded way to say I love what you’re doing. How much of your recruitment of advisors and the retention of that talent as they become successful would you tie to how you compensate them, or equity if that’s available versus the culture of the firm and the mentorship that you and your team provide? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, I mean I’ll speak to what we’re offering now just because that’s more relevant, and so we are positioning ourselves now as the best home for advisors in the country and we really believe that’s the case, but our problem is we’re just a secret. We’ve just come to the market after our deal and all the technology that I know we’ll talk about. So we’re now marketing this message to advisors that want to partner with us. Economics will help them grow. We have a really interesting growth program. We’ll give them equity and Claro. I firmly believe that we should tie each other, just get in the same boat, so to speak. So our success is their success, but allowing them to operate in a 1099 model, which I know is not a popular strategy. I know everyone wants to buy books and own the assets and own the clients, but I feel there’s a tremendous amount of advisors that do not that probably should not be monetizing their businesses so quickly. And so I’m trying to foster a home for those like-minded advisors that want the autonomy to own their clients, maybe even still have a brand, but partner with a firm that’s got really credible technology, just unbelievable back office support and a firm of the future so that they can grow at 10X to what they could have on their own and then they could monetize. That’s what we’ve tried to put together here with our partnership model. Louis Diamond: Love it. Yeah, I mean it is definitely going against the grain a little bit, leaning into growing a 1099 model versus more of an acquisition model where everyone coming over as W-2s. So do you think about those trade-offs when it comes time to raising capital down the line or if you want to sell the business or even just an advisor wants to leave, that would stink if that happened. How do you think about those trade-offs? The ability to let advisors keep control and ownership. And honestly, in my view, probably win many people that you wouldn’t otherwise versus the stickiness, and the enterprise building abilities of owning the books of business. Ryan Belanger: Yeah, it’s a paradox because I understand why you want to own the client, but that’s a different business model. And frankly, I think it attracts different type of people. I had to really look myself in the mirror a couple years ago. We had enjoyed a tremendous amount of success, high growth and all organic, growing at 30% more per year on a CAGR basis. Nothing could stop us. But what happened was when private equity entered the space, everyone wanted to buy Claro. And to me, it didn’t feel like I did a lot of due diligence. I talked to a lot of firms. I didn’t see any differentiation in the market, Louis. To me from a technology perspective, everyone was doing the same thing. They’re using six to 12 different tools. We all know who they are. And now there’s a bunch of AI tools they’re layering on. And to me, it just didn’t feel like that was going to be any… There was no differentiation in the market. But admittedly, I had a couple of friends who I’d brought in at very low levels of AUMB that wanted to leave. And they said, “Look, I want to go to a firm that has more resources.” And so I had to just make a business decision and say, “Where do I want to take this?” And so it was only after some real adversity because you get emotionally attached to these people that you’ve developed friendships with and they still are friends, no doubt, but they can leave and they’re not captive. So we have to plan for that at Claro now, and I think we’ve got two ways that we’ve done that where it really ties the advisors to us, but in a way where they want to be here because we have something that’s really different. Louis Diamond: I like it. I’m sure we’ll get into that. But before we do, we’ll get into what you’re doing on the technology side, which is very cool and unique. How do you balance being an advisor and being a CEO? And what percentage of your time is advisor versus CEO and has that fluctuated or changed over time? Ryan Belanger: Drastically changed in the last year, two years or so. So the first 10, 12 years, I was really an advisor first and foremost. That’s inverse at this point, I’m strictly running the business. I have a great team here that deals with our clients, and I’ll still attend the client meetings and such, but I’m really laser-focused on running the business, trying to develop new partnerships with advisors, running an engineering team, sales and marketing. So the change for me has definitely occurred, and I’ll miss not keeping up with planning as much. I’m a CFP, but I just recognized that for me, I had to make a clear change and commit all my time to running the business, and so that’s the decision that I’ve made. Louis Diamond: It is a hard balance. I mean, there’s some people that try to do both, run a business, be an advisor, be a rainmaker, and something breaks. You’re not able to give all yourself to one thing. Then there’s others that would much prefer to be an advisor over a business owner. Others who say, “I’m over being an advisor. I want to be a business owner.” So I think the cool thing about doing what you’ve done is you get to choose, right? Some of it might be circumstances, but you really got to decide which elements of the business you personally want to invest your time in. And you really push your chips in the middle of the table. So let’s get into what you did in November of 2025. I read that you acquired a tech company of all things called NDVR. I’ve done this podcast for a while, speak to a ton of people. I can’t really think of anyone, any advisor or RIA that’s actually bought a tech company. So what made you puck the trend, buy a tech company and not just license all the FinTech that’s available today? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, that was the decision I had to make was do I really want to be different, or do I want to just say that I’m different? And so I was fortunate enough to get introduced to a gentleman named Michael Simon about 18 months ago, two years ago. And him and I immediately could see that we were both trying to solve the same problem, and we had perfectly mirrored image skills of one another so I had this deep wealth experience and he had a deep tech experience. And sometimes it’s just about timing in life, about catching someone at the right time. And I think we each caught each other at a really good time where we could see that coming together, we could create something really magical. And this AI wave was cresting. And I could see when I was talking to all the national PE firms or RIA firms about what people wanted to do, no one had quite figured out how AI was going to come into the technology mix, and it appears as though it’s just going to be another add-on tool to everything else. And for me, I wanted to try to build something that was integrated an all- in-one platform for an advisor so they didn’t have to use a ton of different tools. And I thought if you could do that, couldn’t you have AI that’s really much more rich and purposeful to help the clients? And so I felt like here’s an opportunity to elevate financial advice throughout the country, really give the clients all the value. And so what we’ve built allows advisors who are really good advisors to become super advisors because they’ve got this technology cape that no one else has that is allowing them to save a bunch of time and do all these really cool things for their clients. But it just felt like right time, right place. I’d been through a little bit of adversity and I felt like taking another swing just like I did 15 years ago going for it. I’ve really never been averse to risk, and so this felt like it was too good to pass up and so we went for it. Louis Diamond: Interesting. So that makes sense on the build or acquire versus rent dynamic, wanting to own the IP that makes you actually different. What does NDVR actually do? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, so everything’s all integrated. So we’ve kept the Claro Advisors name. We feel like clients really want to know that they’re still getting a person to deliver the advice. And so having the advisor’s name in our brand is important, but we have a Claro Intelligent Hub, and that’s where it’s an AI native operating system for the advisors. They spend their entire day in there, Louis. So they’re not toggling between 10 different Chrome tasks to perform all their business. And so what that allows them to do is not only it’s CRM, calendar, contacts, emails, messages, but we also have all the portfolio information. So trading history and we can do tax loss harvesting and factor-based investing. So we’ve got institutional grade portfolio management, and that’s really what Endeavor had created through their R&D was the hyper-personalized portfolios where you have a customer’s financial plan directly tied to their account. So there’s never any de-linking between the two. It’s really sophisticated technology that we can provide to our clients. So that’s all integrated as well. And so we’ve since continued to build the build upon that layer of integrated proprietary technology. Louis Diamond: It’s very interesting. And we have to imagine part of you maybe now or in the future is, okay, we’ve built this amazing technology mousetrap for our advisors, but do we become a FinTech? Is there any thought of eventually licensing what Endeavor is doing for your business and your clients to other RIAs? How do you think about that dynamic of just building something unique and different for Claro that advisors can latch onto versus making what you and your partners have developed into something that someone else can take and license themselves? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, it’s a fair question. We get it a good amount. While there might be a possibility that we license this to some other businesses, our main goal right now is to keep it captive to RIAs that want to partner with Claro. And so we feel like this gives them a true level of differentiation in the market, and so that’s the approach that we’re taking right now. Being a FinTech company, there’s a lot of different skills. The setup and tear down of getting someone to use the platform and I think all that time and resources we want on sales and marketing to try to attract new advisors and continue to develop just jaw-dropping technology for the existing advisors. Louis Diamond: Very cool. Let’s talk a little bit about your partnership model. So it does sound unique in that you have people that are 1099, but you don’t usually also hear partner. So how does it work? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, so we’re offering advisors to come and use Claro as a back office so you can have your own brand if you want or you can just be a Claro advisor. We have both here and you’ll be a 1099 advisor so you’ll still own the business that you’ve owned. So if you were at a wirehouse or something, you would actually now be creating some enterprise value for yourself. But if you’re an existing REA, you’d be coming to us because you’re tired of doing tech vendor due diligence all the time or you’re tired of the compliance, the AI regulations. That’s just coming. So that’s going to be a huge challenge for REAs, so we’re seeing a lot of interest from REAs saying, “Look, you’re not asking me to give up really anything except the stuff that I hate to do anyway, so this sounds great.” So they partner with us. In return, they get all access to our technology And we’ll provide all the back office support, office space, dedicated resources, planning, everything you could want to have to operate a business. We do have a growth program that’s really interesting. And then we’ve got this equity in Claro. As you’re a partner with Claro, you should get equity so we give stock options to our advisors who are here and every year thereafter. And naturally, that’s a way to stay connected with the advisor. So hopefully they never want to leave, and I do believe that once you experience our technology, you never want to go back to trying to do it the way you were doing it before. Louis Diamond: It’s like instead of building the most enclosed box that you keep people in with sticks and with locks and keys like a lot of firms do, it’s we’re going to keep advisors here, but not by force, but because they have the stock options, because you’re delivering value, because they have this amazing technology. To me, that’s the dynamic that so many firms across the industry get wrong is that they try to keep advisors where they are by restrictive covenants and by fear, and by retribution rather than if we just do good work for people, we add value, we make ourselves indispensable to the advisor. To me, it creates a healthier dynamic. I think firms would actually retain more even if it’s a gentler approach. And I love what you’re doing there. I think it’s the exact right way to think about we have advisors that are 1099, so yeah, they could leave us, but we’re doing things that make it that they don’t want to leave us. And that’s your charge as the owner to create the infrastructure and the structure where people could go out on their own, but there isn’t an advantage to do so. Ryan Belanger: Yeah, I think the culture is a big thing for us. And if you have people here that don’t want to be here, that’s a problem. And I think that’s what you see in a lot of the wirehouses. Frankly, they scare people and they don’t. It’s like, oh my God, if I leave. And for us, it’s like personally, life is too short. I want to work with people that want to work with me. I’ve got other things going on in my life and these things are just work things. And so I want to enjoy being in the office every day with people that want to be here. And if you think you’ve found a different place, you should go explore that. It’s really a soft approach. I know it’s not the most popular approach, but that’s just the style that I have. Louis Diamond: Yeah. I mean, it sounds like the trend in your career and in launching Claro was we’re going to do things that aren’t popular, but that work for us, like hiring younger advisors that may not have a book or have a small book, buying a tech company instead of licensing it, being 1099 when you’re recruiting instead of owning books of business. There’s a series of decisions you’ve made as the business owner that they’ve worked out, they’ve paid off, but they’re definitely against the grain. And I very much respect that. Ryan Belanger: I really have never been afraid to be a little different, and so I think typically you find other people that might be interested, but it’s a big pool out there. There’s 300,000 advisors so there’s something for everyone, which is awesome. Louis Diamond: Totally agree. Let’s get back to the AI platform that you’ve built, or that you’re building. Maybe give a real tangible example. If I’m a Claro advisor, how has my life changed now that I’m using this platform versus before? So the old model was I log in, like you said, to 10 different Chrome tabs. I’m meeting with clients, doing planning, et cetera. What is the day in the life? How does it look different from what an advisor’s actually doing today versus before this platform was rolled out? Ryan Belanger: Yeah. All right. I’ll just give you a couple examples. So a client will send you a request and say, “Louis, I need $25,000.” And so a typical advisor would either write a note down, go drop it off at the CSA’s desk, or maybe forward that email to the CSA and then that person would have to input it into their CRM, and they go perform the task. And then the advisor would want to know where things are in that process so that there’s a lot of back and forth. With our system, Claire, our intelligent chief of staff, AI chief of staff, you just forward that task to tasks@claroadvisors.com. It recognizes the email address that the client is emailing from, it knows the account number. It talks to our portfolio engineer. It knows which account to raise the cash from because it knows the tax jurisdiction, and otherwise, and it performs the task. And the last push of a button is that CSA just moving money from the custodian. So all along the way, the advisor can check on the task and see where it is in the process. It’s beautifully integrated in the intelligent hub, but you could see how that would save a tremendous amount of time and it’s a better customer experience. The mistakes get limited. So it really allows the advisor to get things done at a much higher level. So we’re raising productivity quite a bit. First of all, she’ll establish your meetings, Claire will. So she’ll schedule them for you. She’ll prep them for you. So we have a button, say prep the meeting because we have all the notes, emails. If you’re texting portfolio data, because she has all that information in about 30 to 45 seconds, she’s going to present to the advisor a really nice meeting summary that, “Hey, here’s the things that we should talk about.” She’s going to surface things that the advisor’s forgotten about because she doesn’t forget things. And so she’s prepped the meeting for you, so you’ve saved a couple hours there. She joins the meeting, she takes all of your notes, stores them in the system. She’ll give you a follow-up email. She knows your writing style, so she’ll know that you like to call this client this, and you send these emails typically at this time. And so she’ll deliver a nice follow-up email instantly for the advisor. They click that button, that’s done. So there’s just a lot of things that where she’s efficiency-wise where on 20, 30 hours a week that we’re saving advisors just on the productivity tools alone, so that’s where we’re seeing advisors seeing a ton of value in this. Louis Diamond: It’s very cool. Ryan Belanger: And then there’s a whole portfolio management capabilities, sweeping idle cash and tax loss harvesting and rebalancing that gets done while advisors are having a cup of coffee. They don’t have to think about these things. It just gets done for them. Louis Diamond: It’s so cool because it’s like I think I can conceptualize or think of building in Claude any one of those functionalities for the most part, but the way that the flow of things works and the journey of it is unique. I think every advisor would be interested in that type of promise of saving that much time. So how do you think now in the future, how do you think about the human advisor interaction, and what the human and the advisor will do versus what can be offloaded to AI? Ryan Belanger: Yeah, certainly a lot of the non-client-facing activity can be unloaded and that’s where advisors spend, according to recent studies, almost 60% of their time non-client-facing. So we’re trying to take all that off of their plates for them. We strongly believe clients still want the message to come from a person that has a level of experience and understands them. But at the same point, I think there’s a growing curiosity about, geez, what could it do for me? And so shouldn’t my advisor know how to use it? And so I think you’re seeing a lot of advisors put their head in the sand and say, “I don’t know. I’m just going to hope people don’t really want to use this and adopt it.” They’re a little bit shortsighted there. Our bet is that clients are going to want an advisor that knows how to use tech, has really sophisticated tech, but it isn’t just another tool layered on top that now my data is in that tool. The reason our system is so beautiful and integrated is because it captures everything in a structured and secure way. So all of the compliance is in there. We whitewash all the PII that’s sensitive information, so we’re not layering another tool on, because it’s integrated, we have an AI governance committee that really takes it seriously. How are we using this information? And so we’ve got an approach and we’ve put guardrails around what it can do and what it can’t do. Might there be a generation, Louis, that wants an AI advisor? I don’t know, that could happen. A twin, a digital twin where you say, “Look, I want to talk to Louis.” It’s 10 o’clock at night. He might be in a different time zone than me. He’s got little kids, but I do have this question. And so we’re iterating ideas on how we can surface that for an advisor to be advisable 24/7 without actually having to be available 24/7. Louis Diamond: Seven. It’s amazing to think about. I mean, obviously you’re deeply in this. You have a front row seat into the power of AI, how it’s transforming your business, doing due diligence on acquiring this technology five years from now, 10 years from now, what does the industry look like as a result of AI? What’s your big bet? Ryan Belanger: A lot of the big firms are going to try to figure out how to layer in tech. It’s going to be very difficult to do that. It’s built on extremely old legacy technology. They’ll be slow. They’ll figure out how to do some things. What we’re already seeing from advisors is the wow factor. Wow, I didn’t know this was even possible, and so I think just given our size and where we are, we have an advantage that we can build things from the ground up very quickly. I mean, what used to take an engineer a couple of months or years can be done in a couple of days or weeks, so things have really sped up in terms of the development. It’s much easier to build it than buy it. And so I think you’ll see a lot of firms trying to do what we’ve done, really build proprietary technology. And I think there’ll be a few winners that are able to do that, but being tech forward and aligned with someone who’s thinking about it, I think is what a lot of advisors are going to want to be. That’s the type of firm people would want to partner with, I think. Louis Diamond: What about the dynamic of, like you said, the digital twin thing is equal parts cool as it is terrifying, how do you see, we’ll say the threat of AI impacting the profession of being a financial advisor? Do you look at it as the entire pie is going to grow because everyone’s more efficient? Or do you look at it as it’s going to take out a lot of the advisor capacity we have because it’s no longer necessary? Where do you fall on that spectrum? Ryan Belanger: So robo-advisors came and went, you remember those. I mean, not that they went, but they never took off the way that it was projected. They’re still great businesses, but the human advisor won that battle. Clients do want an advisor, particularly at the higher end, and so I think at the lower end of the market, you’re going to see some AI solutions where people are perfectly comfortable just talking to someone in AI, and they’ll figure out if there’s a hallucinization or not. But I think there’s definitely going to be a market for it, and so I think it just depends on where the clients are and what level of complexity they have. On the higher end, I do feel like the advisors will continue to have a huge advantage there. But we’re building tools to give optionality to advisors. There might be some advisors who say, “Look, I’ll charge half the fee that I used to charge so you can get my digital twin. And that’s a win-win situation for everybody.” Louis Diamond: Yep, that’s fair. So do you look at your competitive ecosystem now? Not for recruiting advisors, let’s say for winning clients. Do you look at Farther and Savvy and different AI or FinTechs as your competition or do you still look at it as the wirehouses and other traditional RIAs? Ryan Belanger: I mean, Farther and Savvy have done a great job of going after this market. I think we’re not as well known yet as they are. We’ve certainly built out what we think is tremendous technology second to none. There’s a huge market of the IBD space that is just these guys and gals are stuck on these old platforms and things are okay, but they’re not super compelled to switch until maybe they see something like this, and so we have a massive pipeline of advisors and I’ve been recruiting for a long time. I’ve never had a pipeline like this. So I know it feels different to me. People really are interested in this. It’s enough for them to want to see tech demos and come visit us and really understand, okay, this is a firm that is challenging what’s possible and that’s someone that maybe I want to be aligned with, and so I think that there’s a lot of places where we can get the talent. And so for us, it’s just trying to find the right people that we want to partner with for the long term. Louis Diamond: Very cool, I got two more questions for you. It’s pretty remarkable that to get from where you started to now, the recruiting you’ve done, buying a FinTech, integrating it, that you still don’t have private equity investor outside capital. So you think it’s on the roadmap, whether it’s a certain size or you’re looking for personal liquidity where the business will just need it because it’s expensive to operate a FinTech platform and to scale up and to keep growing the firm. Do you think there’s a world in which you take on external capital to fuel your growth? Ryan Belanger: Most certainly. I mean, things have developed for us very quickly here, and outside capital and venture particular is a space that we’re actively in discussions with firms that believe in our vision, understand the value that we can create, and there’s just no doubt that you have to have some wind at your back to get to the market, and so while we’re not a household name right now, I’m confident in two years we will be, and our plan is to grow to hundreds and thousands of advisors across the country. Louis Diamond: Wow, big vision, but I love it. Last question for you. If you were 30 years old again, which I think everyone would kill for that opportunity, leaving Morgan Stanley today instead of in 2012, what do you think you would do differently knowing what you know now? Ryan Belanger: At that point, interest rates were near zero, Louis. Valuations you remember were two to three times revenue. It felt expensive then. Obviously things have changed quite a bit. So I would’ve begged, borrowed, and stole all the money I could from friends and family and said, “I need to buy as many businesses as I could at two times, three times revenue and pay, I don’t know, 3% loan.” Just in hindsight, that’s what everyone should have done. That’s not the path that we chose, but I think there’s a huge opportunity in front of us to elevate financial advice across the country, make really good advisors even better by putting that super cape on them. And so we’re very excited about the future, what we’ve got in store, and what we’re going to deliver to the market. And it seems like just yesterday that I walked out of Morgan Stanley with very little assets and tried to start this RIA, but I’m very thankful for all the people that have been supporting me throughout this journey. Louis Diamond: Amazing. And that’s a great spot to end, but let me ask the inverse of that question. Let’s say you leave in 2026, so leave today, you’re 30 years old, but you have the benefit of hindsight. You know what you know now. What would you do differently around the transition or building the firm other than of course be amazing if you can buy businesses for a fraction of what they cost today? Ryan Belanger: I would want to make sure that I’ve got an integrated solution. I don’t want to be picking a bunch of different vendor tools. I know that’s going to become way too time-consuming for me. So I would really try to figure out how you can get something that’s integrated that can scale, but I wouldn’t change anything about the people. I think you got to be able to connect with people that are like-minded and you still take the risk. What I can’t believe, Louis, is that people that sit at the wirehouses take a home team discount and they’re so fearful of leaving Morgan Stanley or Merrill Lynch or UBS, but why are they taking that? The market says you should be paid double what you paid. And it’s not just like that’s 20, 30 years of data here that show that. And so I just would keep pushing people to bet on yourself. Your clients will come with you. Yes, that firm that you love will be the first ones to try to steal your clients. They’re going to call them, and that’s one way, loyalty. Another thing I don’t understand, but that’s the way the business is structured. I think there’s a huge opportunity to just educate advisors about what’s out there and I would take the risk. Louis Diamond: Love it. Ryan, this has been very fun. What you’ve accomplished, like I said earlier, gone against the grain at every turn. Leaving on the younger side without a huge business, buying and integrating a technology company, recruiting younger advisors without books of business. Every single thing you’ve done has been a different playbook. So I’m pumped to watch how we make Claro a household name and how this approach is going to pay off in spade. So I appreciate hearing this different perspective, and I know our listeners did as well, so much appreciated today. Ryan Belanger: Well, thanks for having me on. I know it’s a long time coming. Thanks for your patience. I wanted to make sure we had something really exciting to talk about when we finally did this, and hopefully I can come back in a couple years and catch up. And congratulations on everything you guys have built. You guys are just a premier name out there, and it’s been fun to watch your success as well. Louis Diamond: Thank you, Ryan, I appreciate it. Mindy Diamond: As a financial advisor, you hold yourself to the highest standards of integrity, honesty, and credibility. You are successful because you take your professional responsibilities seriously and are dedicated to your clients. But are you living your best business life? Are your goals aligned with your firms or could a better option exist? Should I Stay or Should I Go? is a book written with you in mind. It’s a self-guided journey that walks you through the key steps that we take with our advisor clients. This strategic thought process and roadmap to professional self-discovery is designed to help you ask the right questions and think critically and objectively whether you’re considering change or not. Learn how to get your copy at diamond-consultants.com/thebook. Why AI Matters Now: How a $1.5B RIA is Building the Firm of the Future A conversation with Louis Diamond and Ryan Belanger, Founder & CEO of Claro Advisors. Louis Diamond: Welcome to the latest episode of our podcast series for financial advisors. Today’s episode is Why AI Matters Now: How a $1.5B RIA is Building the Firm of the Future. It’s a conversation with Ryan Belanger, the Founder and CEO of Claro Advisors. I’m Louis Diamond, and this is the Diamond Podcast for Financial Advisors. Mindy Diamond: At Diamond Consultants, we help elite advisors identify the right environment for their businesses to thrive, whether that’s at a wirehouse, boutique, or independent firm. With nearly three decades of experience, we’ve guided thousands of advisors and represented more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in assets transitioned. And each year, one in four advisors managing a billion dollars or more who change firms are our clients. Our process is education driven, and based on building relationships, starting as your strategic partner well before you’re even thinking of a move. To schedule a confidential conversation, call us at (908) 879-1002. Wondering why advisors change firms and where they’re headed? Are transition deals going up or down? Those very questions and more inspired us to create our annual Advisor Transition Report. It’s the award-winning data-driven resource designed for advisors that connects the dots between the motivations around movement and the firm’s appetite for top talent. Arm yourself with the knowledge you need to make smart decisions. Download your copy at diamond-consultants.com/transitionreport. Louis Diamond: Artificial intelligence has quickly become one of the biggest topics in wealth management in the world. Almost every firm is experimenting with new tools, looking for ways to automate tasks, improve efficiency, or help advisors serve clients more effectively. But what if AI isn’t just another technology to plug into your business? What if it becomes the foundation for how your business is built? That’s exactly why I wanted to have Ryan Belanger on the show. Ryan is the Founder and CEO of Claro Advisors, a billion and a half dollar RIA that’s taken a very different path than most firms in the industry. Rather than simply adding AI to an existing tech stack, Claro acquired a FinTech company and is building its own AI native operating system designed specifically for advisors. What’s interesting is that this isn’t really a conversation about software, it’s about strategy. Ryan has consistently gone against the grain from leaving Morgan Stanley to launch an independent firm in 2012 before it became commonplace, to recruiting younger advisors when others chased established producers, to betting that proprietary technology will b
Por supuesto que hablamos de Spider-Man: Brand New Day, pero también tiramos reseñas de Ted Lasso, La Odisea y otras. Analizamos las series y películas que Marvel y DC han cancelado, revelamos si debe haber Barbie 2, y anticipamos que pasará con Street Fighter. Spider-Man: Brand New Day (Todos, Sin spoilers) Batman: Caped Crusader (George) La Odisea (Lola, Gazoo) Ted Lasso (George) NOTICIAS ¿Será que DC y Marvel finalmente aprendieron la lección de aguantarse? Blade no va: https://www.gq.com/story/mahershala-ali-your-mother-your-mother-your-mother Ni Booster Gold: https://www.comingsoon.net/tv/news/2170165-david-jenkins-dc-series-booster-gold Ni Wonder Man: https://www.comingsoon.net/tv/news/2170095-wonder-man-season-2-cancellation-fan-concerns-mcu-tv-shows Claro que quieren hacer Barbie 2: https://www.ign.com/articles/barbie-2-will-have-to-start-from-scratch-if-warner-bros-cant-make-a-deal-with-talent-by-december ¿Le irá bien a Street Fighter? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGyyykgo6Qo Spider-Man: Brand New Day CON TODOS LOS SPOILERS
Double Tap Double Tap - Ep 473 August 3, 2026 Presented by This episode of Double Tap is brought to you by: Foxtrot Mike (Code: WLSISLIFE) Gideon Optics (Code: WLSISLIFE) Blue Alpha Night Fision (Code: WLSISLIFE) Second Call Defense Giveaways!! GAW Text Dear WLS or Reviews +1 743 500 2171 Public Show Titles Dear WLS Question from Brownguy78 from Iowa Question by Brownguy78 : can you please give the suicide hotline number before Savage oner goes ballistic?? I am on the verge of checking mouth feel with my daily carry every time he goes ballistic.. reminds me of Jamie from progressive insurance commercials. #wlsislife #fuckSavage #agency171forever! Question from Josh from Texas Are newer production Winchester 94's in 30-30 good for plinking and fun range use? I heard I should buy an older production model. Curious to your thoughts.Josh WINNER Question from Anonymous Coward from OH So I have a 5″ Springfield Prodigy DS 1911. Sometimes, I conceal carry it with an IWB C&G Holster. The gun seems to ride too low in my waistline. I have tried both their plastic IWB clips and their metal Alpha clips. Are there any belt clips that you guys know of that will allow the gun and holster to ride a little bit higher. Thank you Question from Anonymous Coward from California I'm looking to up my 18650 stash and need some input from the almighty guntoob lords. I've got a surefire M640 DFT turbo scout and a streamlight protac (with arisaka adapter and surefire pressure switch tail cap – may matter for battery length?) I don't want to pay bullshit streamlight/surefire battery prices. Do you guys have any favorite cheaper alternatives? I know I need a protected high drain battery, but looking for something I can stock up on and not break the bank. I just got some keeppower 3500 mAh batteries from illumn for my fenix lights for $9/piece but I don't think they support high draw applications… or would they work? Any steering in the right direction would be greatly appreciated! #yéremyisafuddp.s. I have an XTAR charger so I don't need any fancy usb charge top bullshit p.p.s. Do you guys have any favorite battery storage containers for taking on hunting trips that keep them dry and protected but not take up too much room? I don't have the ability to 3d print, so looking to buy. Question from Chad from Michigan Up North Chad from Michigan I'm converting an AR in 5.56 to 300 blackout. What is a good barrel and block combo? It will be a suppressor host and basically strictly subsonic. (Because super sonic 300blk is retarded) Something like 8 to 12 inches. Also, suggestions on a big ol' quiet can under $800? Thanks, Question from Anonymous Coward from Arizona I wrote a while ago asking for recommendations on a light 6.5 Creedmoor rifle for hunting. In that question, I mentioned I wasn't interested in a Bergara after my first experience with them. I'm writing in again to elaborate as requested. It's kind of a long story so buckle up.I bought a Bergara B14-HMR in 6.5 CM and was pretty excited as it was my first “higher end” bolt action, or so I thought. I took it out shooting a few times and just couldn't seem to get it to group well and I was running out of adjustment on my scope. I was a bit confused but I figured id just double check all my mounting. So as I was cleaning it after that range trip, I looked at it from the front and thought the scope looked a little crooked. I got about a hundred second opinions and sure enough, something was off. I thought “there's no way the scope or the gun could be built that wrong”. I warrantied the scope rail and the rings as well as replaced them twice, but neither fixed the problem. So I started talking to the scope manufacturer and sent it in to be checked. They sent it back with a green light and said there was no problems. At this point I was several weeks into tracing down problems and emailing manufacturers so it pissed me off. I finally decided it must be the gun. I took it to a gunsmith and he started mounting a rail on it and everything finally became clear. Instead of starting all the screws a little then going through and torquing them like I had done, he installed the rear screws fully. One of the front screws was then dropped and immediately tried going in at a 45 degree Gun Industry News Thefirearmblog Steiner MPS 2.0 Micro Pistol Sight Steiner has released the MPS 2.0, an updated enclosed-emitter red dot sight building on the original MPS with reinforced design, improved ergonomics, larger buttons, easier maintenance, and extended battery life. It features true 1x magnification, a 21 mm x 16 mm window, 3.3 MOA dot, ACRO footprint, and rugged construction suitable for military and law enforcement use. The Gist: Available at steiner-optics.com (article published August 1, 2026) Impact: $631.99 MSRP Bottom Line: 1x magnification, 21x16mm window, 3.3 MOA red dot, CR2032 battery (up to 90,000 hours at brightness level 4), 8 brightness settings (2 NV compatible), waterproof to 35 m, -40°F to 140°F operating temp, 1 MOA clicks (90 MOA total windage/elevation), 2.32 oz, reinforced enclosed emitter with ACRO footprint Theoutdoorwire Woox Gladiatore V2 Pump-Action Shotgun Stock & Forend Woox has released the Gladiatore V2, a premium American walnut upgrade for Mossberg pump-action shotguns consisting of a precision-fit stock and forend. The design incorporates a wraparound grip, aggressive checkering, and ventilated butt pad to improve ergonomics, reduce length-of-pull, and better manage recoil for faster follow-up shots. Handcrafted in limited runs from Claro-grade walnut with Italian design influence and U.S. assembly, it is offered as individual components or a complete kit. The Gist: Announced August 3, 2026; available for purchase via www.wooxstore.com Impact: MSRP $439 Bottom Line: Compatible with Mossberg 88/500/590/590 A1 and Shockwave; features wraparound grip technology, aggressive checkering, ventilated butt pad, reduced length-of-pull, and Claro-grade American walnut construction Before we let you go – Join Gun Owners of America We'd love if you supported the show, join Agency 171 at agency171.com. Lot's of prizes, rewards and kick ass swag. No matter how tough your battle is today, we want you here fight with us tomorrow. Don't struggle in silence, you can contact the suicide prevention line by dialing 988 from your phone. Remember – Always prefer Dangerous Freedom over peaceful slavery. We'll see you next time! Nick – @busbuiltsystems | Bus Built Systems Jeremy – @ret_actual | Rivers Edge Tactical Aaron – @machinegun_moses Savage – @savage1r Shawn – @dangerousfreedomyt | @camorado.cam | Camorado