Podcasts about lord chief justice

Our courts are in crisis, with a sentencing backlog stretching to unthinkable lengths. To discuss this issue, the Law & Disorder trio are joined by Alex Chalk KC, who was Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice until the summer, and Lord Thomas, a former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. They are proposed a radical new programme for dealing with this backlog, involving slimming down the trial process for more minor offences. Could this clear the backlog? Or does it risk jeopardising our jury-based justice system? As ever, Helena Kennedy, Charlie Falconer and Nicholas Mostyn are on-hand to ask the questions.If you have questions, criticisms, praise or other feedback, please do send your thoughts to us via lawanddisorderfeedback@gmail.com!Law and Disorder is a Podot podcast.Hosted by: Charlie Falconer, Helena Kennedy, Nicholas Mostyn.Executive Producer and Editor: Nick Hilton.Associate Producer: Ewan Cameron.Music by Richard Strauss, arranged and performed by Anthony Willis & Brett Bailey. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we're revisiting a wonderful discussion with Professor Richard Susskind. In the time since he joined us on the podcast, Richard has been promoted to CBE—Commander of the Order of the British Empire in the King's New Year Honours List 2025 for his “services to Information Technology and to the Law.” Richard has also written a new book, How To Think About AI: A Guide For The Perplexed, in which he addresses the most challenging issues of AI technology that are currently being debated—the business, risk, legal, ethical, management, and philosophical implications. The book will be available in March for those in the UK, and in April for those in the US. We have provided a link with additional information in the show notes. Congratulations to Richard on these recent accomplishments. And thank you to everyone for listening. We hope you enjoy! Today, we welcome a very special guest—Professor Richard Susskind. For those who have been engaged in the discussions around legal tech for the past few decades, Richard needs no introduction. He is one of the most advanced thinkers on the impact of technology on the profession, and has been challenging our notions about what it will mean to be a lawyer for a long time. Richard is an adviser, speaker, and author who was focused on legal tech and the future of the profession long before these subjects were top of mind in the industry. In the 1980s, he wrote his doctorate at Oxford University on artificial intelligence, and today, his main area of expertise continues to be the impact of AI and other technologies on the legal profession. Among other roles, Richard is President of the Society for Computers and Law, and Technology Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. He is also an adviser to leading professional firms, in-house legal departments, and governments and judiciaries around the world. He is a frequent speaker at conferences, seminars, retreats, and other events, having been invited to lecture in more than 60 countries. Richard has written 10 books and has contributed more than 150 articles to The Times of London. His most recent publication is the third edition of Tomorrow's Lawyers, which guides legal professionals through the imminent future of law, and calls upon the next generation of lawyers to embrace technology in order to improve current legal and court services. In our conversation, Richard discusses the ways we should all be thinking about legal innovation, the challenges of training lawyers for the future, and the qualifications of those likely to develop breakthrough technologies in law, as well as his own journey and how he became interested in AI as an undergraduate student.

In the latest episode of Double Jeopardy, Ken Macdonald and Tim Owen are joined by Lord Burnett of Maldon, the former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, to talk about punishment and the British addiction to prison. As one of five co-authors of a significant report on the subject (published by the Howard League in September) Lord Burnett shares his insights on the need for change in our approach to sentencing, the challenges within our overcrowded prisons, and the societal implications of the current punitive system. Together, the trio explore key questions such as why prison sentences have doubled in length over the past 50 years, whether longer sentences truly reduce crime, and the impact of political decision-making on our justice system. Ken and Tim also turn their attention to the damning allegations surrounding the late Mohamed Al-Fayed and the wider implications this case holds for the criminal justice system. This major scandal is just beginning.

At the Future Lawyer UK Conference, co-host Alma-Constance interviews Richard Susskind on Law, Tech and How It Affects Kids As They Grow Up. In this special interview, questions such as how AI will affect how laws are drafted will be explored!Professor Richard Susskind OBE KC (Hon) is half-lawyer, half-technologist. He has written 10 books and his work has been translated into 18 languages. His eleventh book, How to Think About AI: A Guide to the Perplexed, is to be published in the coming year. With his son, Daniel, he co-authored The Future of the Professions (2015, 2022), which was an FT Book of the Year. He is President of the Society for Computers and Law and, for 25 years, was Technology Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England. He wrote his PhD on artificial intelligence and the law at Oxford University in the early 1980s.Keep your questions coming in. Please subscribe, rate, and share the podcast with your friends. See you soon in the next episode!You can follow us @kidslawinfo on LinkedIn, X and Instagram

Britain's prisons are in crisis. In the past week, we've seen the early release of some 1,500 prisoners in order to free up space in our nation's jails. But how did we get here? On this week's Law & Disorder, Charlie Falconer, Helena Kennedy and Nicholas Mostyn are joined by Ian Burnett, who served as Lord Chief Justice from 2017 to 2023. They have a candid and critical discussion about the state of our prisons, the nature of sentencing (and sentence inflation), and whether there are any remedies to hand.If you have questions, criticisms, praise or other feedback, pelase do send your thoughts to us via lawanddisorderfeedback@gmail.com!Law and Disorder is a Podot podcast.Executive Producer and Editor: Nick Hilton.Associate Producer: Ewan Cameron.Music by Richard Strauss, arranged and performed by Anthony Willis & Brett Bailey.PR by Sally Jones. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Drag may be under fire today by the enforcers of “family values,” but not so back in the early 1900s according to scholar and historian Andrew L. Erdman, author of “Beautiful: The story of Julian Eltinge, America's Greatest Female Impersonator” (interviewed by David Hunt). And in NewsWrap: openly gay Malcolm Bishop's appointment as Lord Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Tonga draws immediate calls for his removal, Iran's government summons Australian Ambassador Ian McConville for a post celebrating Australia's “Wear It Purple Day” for queer youth. six major U.S. publishers sue Florida for its book ban policy, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints will now “annotate” trans Mormons' membership records like child pornographers and church embezzlers, Virginia's Sweet Briar College changes its admissions policy to exclude trans and non-binary applicants, and more international LGBTQ news reported this week by Elena Botkin-Levy and John Dyer V (produced by Brian DeShazor).  All this on the September 9, 2024 edition of This Way Out! Join our family of listener-donors today at http://thiswayout.org/donate/ NOTE TO RADIO STATIONS: Beginning October 1, 2024, the weekly program uploaded to Soundcloud will include a pitch for This Way Out/Overnight Productions (Inc.). Stations can download a pitch-free version from radio4all.net or Pacifica's AudioPort.Org. For more information, contact Brian@ThisWayOut.org.

In this episode, Kate is joined by Professor Richard Susskind OBE KC (Hon) to discuss the future of family law and legal services.About the episodeThis episode is focused on technology, the future of family law and legal services. Richard explains how the landscape has changed and what we, as consumers, can expect for the future. Especially when it comes to AI, alternative dispute resolution delivered remotely and things that haven't even been imagined yet.  Meet our guestRichard is the world's most cited author on the future of legal services. He is President of The Society for Computers and Law and he served as Technology Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. His main area of expertise is the future of professional services and the way that AI and other technologies are changing the work of lawyers. He advises leading professional firms, in-house legal departments, and governments and judiciaries around the world. Richard has authored ten books, including The Future of Law and Tomorrow's Lawyers. He has also contributed more than 150 columns to The Times. In 2000, he was made an OBE, and In 2022, the King approved Richard's appointment as an Honorary King's Counsel. 

On n'imagine pas plus un juge anglais sans perruque qu'un "bobby" sans son casque arrondi. Les magistrats ne sont d'ailleurs pas les seuls à s'en coiffer ; les avocats en portent une aussi.L'usage s'en est imposé à la fin du XVIIe siècle. On adopte alors, pour les tribunaux, un code vestimentaire comprenant également l'adoption d'une robe, agrémentée de détails décoratifs, comme un jabot de dentelles pour certains magistrats.Il s'agissait d'imposer aux hommes de loi anglais une tenue correcte, qui les distingue en même temps de celle de leurs concitoyens. Elle devenait donc l'emblème de leur profession.Les perruques et les robes des magistrats sont toujours portées, du moins dans certains procès. Faites en crin de cheval, les perruques des avocats sont plus courtes que celles des juges.La forme du haut de la coiffe, ainsi que le nombre et l'aspect des boucles qui en composent l'arrière, sont codifiés avec une grande précision. Il est à signaler que cet usage de la perruque, pour les juges et avocats, a été repris par de nombreux pays du Commonwealth.Certains magistrats contestent cependant le port de la perruque. Ils la trouvent inconfortable, surtout en été. Et ils estiment cet usage désuet et peu conforme aux habitudes vestimentaires de leur époque.Mais les partisans de la perruque ne manquent pas. On sait que les Anglais ne goûtent guère les changements trop rapides. Pour beaucoup d'entre eux, le maintien des traditions est le meilleur moyen de préserver l'originalité de leur culture.Par ailleurs, la perruque est vue comme l'une des pièces d'un uniforme. Comme tout uniforme, il favorise une certaine forme d'anonymat, garantie de neutralité. Enfin, cette tenue, dont fait partie la perruque, symbolise l'autorité même de la loi.Des arguments qui n'ont pas entièrement convaincu le Lord Chief Justice, le juge le plus haut placé dans la hiérarchie judiciaire britannique. En 2007, en effet, il décide, à la suite d'une requête portée devant les tribunaux, de réserver le port de la perruque aux seuls procès criminels.Dans les affaires civiles, juges et avocats peuvent désormais paraître dans le prétoire sans arborer ce couvre-chef. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

On n'imagine pas plus un juge anglais sans perruque qu'un "bobby" sans son casque arrondi. Les magistrats ne sont d'ailleurs pas les seuls à s'en coiffer ; les avocats en portent une aussi. L'usage s'en est imposé à la fin du XVIIe siècle. On adopte alors, pour les tribunaux, un code vestimentaire comprenant également l'adoption d'une robe, agrémentée de détails décoratifs, comme un jabot de dentelles pour certains magistrats. Il s'agissait d'imposer aux hommes de loi anglais une tenue correcte, qui les distingue en même temps de celle de leurs concitoyens. Elle devenait donc l'emblème de leur profession. Les perruques et les robes des magistrats sont toujours portées, du moins dans certains procès. Faites en crin de cheval, les perruques des avocats sont plus courtes que celles des juges. La forme du haut de la coiffe, ainsi que le nombre et l'aspect des boucles qui en composent l'arrière, sont codifiés avec une grande précision. Il est à signaler que cet usage de la perruque, pour les juges et avocats, a été repris par de nombreux pays du Commonwealth. Certains magistrats contestent cependant le port de la perruque. Ils la trouvent inconfortable, surtout en été. Et ils estiment cet usage désuet et peu conforme aux habitudes vestimentaires de leur époque. Mais les partisans de la perruque ne manquent pas. On sait que les Anglais ne goûtent guère les changements trop rapides. Pour beaucoup d'entre eux, le maintien des traditions est le meilleur moyen de préserver l'originalité de leur culture. Par ailleurs, la perruque est vue comme l'une des pièces d'un uniforme. Comme tout uniforme, il favorise une certaine forme d'anonymat, garantie de neutralité. Enfin, cette tenue, dont fait partie la perruque, symbolise l'autorité même de la loi. Des arguments qui n'ont pas entièrement convaincu le Lord Chief Justice, le juge le plus haut placé dans la hiérarchie judiciaire britannique. En 2007, en effet, il décide, à la suite d'une requête portée devant les tribunaux, de réserver le port de la perruque aux seuls procès criminels. Dans les affaires civiles, juges et avocats peuvent désormais paraître dans le prétoire sans arborer ce couvre-chef. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alma-Constance and Lucinda take a look back at the top 5 episodes over the 3 year lifespan of Kids Law podcast. This episodes features:- former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett, the most downloaded episode - former head of the Department of Public Prosecutions, Sir Max Hill KC, the most publicised episode across media - former president of the UK Supreme Court, Baroness Brenda Hale - barrister Adam Wagner, the only guest to have been featured twice on the episode, once joined by his daughter - barrister Sultana Tafadar KC, also joined by her daughter Keep your questions coming in. Please subscribe, rate, and share the podcast with your friends. See you soon in the next episode!You can follow us @kidslawinfo on LinkedIn, Twitter and Instagram

On n'imagine pas plus un juge anglais sans perruque qu'un "bobby" sans son casque arrondi. Les magistrats ne sont d'ailleurs pas les seuls à s'en coiffer ; les avocats en portent une aussi.L'usage s'en est imposé à la fin du XVIIe siècle. On adopte alors, pour les tribunaux, un code vestimentaire comprenant également l'adoption d'une robe, agrémentée de détails décoratifs, comme un jabot de dentelles pour certains magistrats.Il s'agissait d'imposer aux hommes de loi anglais une tenue correcte, qui les distingue en même temps de celle de leurs concitoyens. Elle devenait donc l'emblème de leur profession.Les perruques et les robes des magistrats sont toujours portées, du moins dans certains procès. Faites en crin de cheval, les perruques des avocats sont plus courtes que celles des juges.La forme du haut de la coiffe, ainsi que le nombre et l'aspect des boucles qui en composent l'arrière, sont codifiés avec une grande précision. Il est à signaler que cet usage de la perruque, pour les juges et avocats, a été repris par de nombreux pays du Commonwealth.Certains magistrats contestent cependant le port de la perruque. Ils la trouvent inconfortable, surtout en été. Et ils estiment cet usage désuet et peu conforme aux habitudes vestimentaires de leur époque.Mais les partisans de la perruque ne manquent pas. On sait que les Anglais ne goûtent guère les changements trop rapides. Pour beaucoup d'entre eux, le maintien des traditions est le meilleur moyen de préserver l'originalité de leur culture.Par ailleurs, la perruque est vue comme l'une des pièces d'un uniforme. Comme tout uniforme, il favorise une certaine forme d'anonymat, garantie de neutralité. Enfin, cette tenue, dont fait partie la perruque, symbolise l'autorité même de la loi.Des arguments qui n'ont pas entièrement convaincu le Lord Chief Justice, le juge le plus haut placé dans la hiérarchie judiciaire britannique. En 2007, en effet, il décide, à la suite d'une requête portée devant les tribunaux, de réserver le port de la perruque aux seuls procès criminels.Dans les affaires civiles, juges et avocats peuvent désormais paraître dans le prétoire sans arborer ce couvre-chef. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

On n'imagine pas plus un juge anglais sans perruque qu'un "bobby" sans son casque arrondi. Les magistrats ne sont d'ailleurs pas les seuls à s'en coiffer ; les avocats en portent une aussi. L'usage s'en est imposé à la fin du XVIIe siècle. On adopte alors, pour les tribunaux, un code vestimentaire comprenant également l'adoption d'une robe, agrémentée de détails décoratifs, comme un jabot de dentelles pour certains magistrats. Il s'agissait d'imposer aux hommes de loi anglais une tenue correcte, qui les distingue en même temps de celle de leurs concitoyens. Elle devenait donc l'emblème de leur profession. Les perruques et les robes des magistrats sont toujours portées, du moins dans certains procès. Faites en crin de cheval, les perruques des avocats sont plus courtes que celles des juges. La forme du haut de la coiffe, ainsi que le nombre et l'aspect des boucles qui en composent l'arrière, sont codifiés avec une grande précision. Il est à signaler que cet usage de la perruque, pour les juges et avocats, a été repris par de nombreux pays du Commonwealth. Certains magistrats contestent cependant le port de la perruque. Ils la trouvent inconfortable, surtout en été. Et ils estiment cet usage désuet et peu conforme aux habitudes vestimentaires de leur époque. Mais les partisans de la perruque ne manquent pas. On sait que les Anglais ne goûtent guère les changements trop rapides. Pour beaucoup d'entre eux, le maintien des traditions est le meilleur moyen de préserver l'originalité de leur culture. Par ailleurs, la perruque est vue comme l'une des pièces d'un uniforme. Comme tout uniforme, il favorise une certaine forme d'anonymat, garantie de neutralité. Enfin, cette tenue, dont fait partie la perruque, symbolise l'autorité même de la loi. Des arguments qui n'ont pas entièrement convaincu le Lord Chief Justice, le juge le plus haut placé dans la hiérarchie judiciaire britannique. En 2007, en effet, il décide, à la suite d'une requête portée devant les tribunaux, de réserver le port de la perruque aux seuls procès criminels. Dans les affaires civiles, juges et avocats peuvent désormais paraître dans le prétoire sans arborer ce couvre-chef. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Legacy Act is Here The widely opposed Legacy Bill is now enacted as the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act, 2023. But it remains widely hated and the Irish government has launched inter-state proceedings against the UK administration. This is a clear and strong sign of how bad relations are between the two governments that are co-guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement.Out of what we can now call the Legacy Act comes the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery. While this body – abbreviated to ICRIR – investigates past events from the Troubles, the Act limits criminal investigations, legal proceedings, inquests and police complaints. The Act also extends the prisoner release scheme that was initially enacted in 1998. In addition, the legislation aims to provide “for experiences to be recorded and preserved and for events to be studied and memorialised”.The Irish government's inter-state case claims that the Legacy Act reneges on previous commitments entered into by the UK government through the Stormont House Agreement. In addition, that the legislation is not victim-centred; that it is not consistent with obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, which is a cornerstone of the Good Friday Agreement; that it is widely opposed within Northern Ireland; that it allows for the granting of immunity; and that it closes down existing police investigations and civil actions. Ireland argues that the ICRIR investigations are not a substitute for properly resourced police investigations.In the latest Holywell Conversations, Sara Duddy from the Pat Finucane Centre explains why it and the victims it represents will not co-operate with ICRIR. Coinciding with the establishment of ICRIR, the Centre has launched its own ‘Impunity Project', through which families of victims of Troubles killings seek to challenge false allegations against dead relatives. In some cases – as with Bloody Sunday – the Army falsely accused the dead of being bombers or otherwise paramilitaries to ‘justify' their killings.Families are now seeking two types of justice – to know the truth behind killings and to correct false allegations against dead relatives.The other interview in the latest podcast is with Peter Sheridan, a former senior officer with the RUC and PSNI who is now Commissioner for Investigations at ICRIR. He operates under the overall leadership of former Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, Sir Declan Morgan, who is the Chief Commissioner.Peter says that ICRIR hopes to be fully operational in the middle of this year and explains how it will proceed and how relatives of those who died, and also those seriously injured, will be able to raise cases with ICRIR. He argues strongly that his police background will not undermine his credibility as lead investigator.With such a wide array of opponents and critics of the Legacy Act – ranging from the five largest Northern Ireland parties, to the Northern Ireland Human Rights Chief Commissioner, to the departing Victims Commissioner, to victims groups and to international human rights groups – it seems implausible that ICRIR will have an easy birth.The podcast can be listened to at the Holywell Trust website along with previous episodes. Disclaimer: This project has received support from the Northern Ireland Community Relations Council which aims to promote a pluralist society characterised by equity, respect for diversity, and recognition of interdependence. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Community Relations Council. 

Emmannuelle Prévert relieves the boredom of a flight on Concorde by seducing timid Theodore Valentine. She returns home to London to surprise her husband, the French ambassador, Émile Prevert but first surprises the butler, Lyons. He removes her coat, only to find that she has left her dress on the aircraft. The chauffeur, Leyland, housekeeper, Mrs Dangle, and aged boot-boy, Richmond sense saucy times ahead… and they are right! Émile is dedicated to his bodybuilding, leaving a sexually frustrated Emmannuelle to find pleasure with everyone from the Lord Chief Justice to chat show host Harold Hump. Theodore is spurned by Emmannuelle, who has genuinely forgotten their airborne encounter, and despite reassurances from his mother, exacts revenge by revealing Emmannuelle's antics to the press. However, after a visit to her doctor, she discovers that she is pregnant and decides to settle down to a faithful marriage with Émile… and dozens of children.

JASNA member Renata Dennis joins us to discuss the fascinating story of Dido Belle, a woman of color caught between two identities. Dido was the daughter of an enslaved woman and a British naval officer but was raised as a gentlewoman in the household of William Murray, Earl of Mansfield and Lord Chief Justice of the Court of the King's Bench. Until recently, she was lost to history.  Renata also shares her thoughts on Dido Belle as the inspiration for Jane Austen's character Miss Lambe in Sanditon.Transcript and show notes:  https://jasna.org/austen/podcast/ep7Visit our website:  www.jasna.orgFollow us on Instagram and FacebookEmail: podcast@jasna.org

Henry IV dies offstage between Acts 4 and 5. Hal, now Henry V, embraces his brothers and vindicates the Lord Chief Justice, who had had him arrested, notwithstanding he was the future king of England. The play ends as he rejects his false father figure, Falstaff, in a devastating speech. Henry V opens with a famous Prologue that is in fact about the power of imagination, working through language, necessary to swell the bare “O” of the stage into two nations and the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/michael-dolzani/support

Part 2 mirrors Part 1 but has a harsh, almost naturalistic realism that is quite different and modern-seeming. It takes place immediately after the first part, and a personified Rumour spreads fake news about the outcome of the Battle of Shrewsbury. Northumberland throws away his crutches and decides he isn't sick anymore, now that the battle is over. Falstaff encounters the incorruptible Lord Chief Justice but succeeds yet again in exploiting Mistress Quickly, who loves him maternally and will do anything for him. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/michael-dolzani/support

The new Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk KC MP speaks to Joshua Rozenberg. How does he respond to criticisms levelled at the reforms of the Parole Board proposed in the Victims and Prisoners Bill? And how does he reconcile his wish to "provide individuals with the due process which is the hallmark of our legal system" with some aspects of the Home Office's Illegal Migration Bill, that aims to stop people crossing to the UK in small boats? Mr Chalk also speaks about new measures to protect investigative journalists from malicious libel actions, and confirms that the new Lord Chief Justice will be a woman, for the first time in a thousand years. Most of the senior judges in England and Wales are male, white, middle-aged and former barristers. The new head of the Judicial Appointments Commission, Helen Pitcher, in her first broadcast interview, tells Joshua that diversity is very important and admits its an issue in the judiciary. So how will she increase it? We hear about projects and research to help remove barriers and ensure senior judges reflect the society they serve. What is it like to do your job after a diagnosis of Parkinson's? The condition affects people differently, but many have a tremor, fatigue, reduced mobility in their arms, legs, or both, and some can have depression. Joshua meets a High Court judge, Sir Nicholas Mostyn, to find out how he has been able to carry on working despite the condition. What are employees' rights in this case? And what is it like for those in other lines of work? We also hear from a nurse with Parkinson's on how she does it. Presenter: Joshua Rozenberg Producer: Arlene Gregorius Researcher: Bethan Ashmead Latham Production Coordinator: Maria Ogundele Editor: Clare Fordham

The Plymouth Company was chartered by King James in 1606 with responsibility for colonizing the northern east coast of America. The merchants agreed to finance the settlers' trip in return for repayment of their expenses plus interest out of the profits made. The Plymouth Company established the Popham Colony, in present-day Maine, the northern answer to the previously discussed Jamestown Colony, founded by the Virginia Company of London. The Popham Colony was named for its chief investor and Lord Chief Justice of England Sir John Popham who presided over the trials of Sir Walter Raleigh and the conspirators of the Gunpowder Plot, including Guy Fawkes. Check out the YouTube version of this episode at https://youtu.be/8ir6XfrrUMw which has accompanying visuals including maps, charts, timelines, photos, illustrations, and diagrams. Ferdinando Gorges books available at https://amzn.to/45G3VIg   Popham Colony books available at https://amzn.to/3C3Qvbu  Maine History books available at https://amzn.to/3N3e2zH New England History books available at https://amzn.to/3OKBPWe                        Abenaki books available at https://amzn.to/43CqDiL        Thanks for the many wonderful comments, messages, ratings and reviews. All of them are regularly posted for your reading pleasure on https://patreon.com/markvinet where you can also get exclusive access to Bonus episodes, Ad-Free content, Extra materials, and an eBook Welcome Gift when joining our growing community on Patreon or Donate on PayPal at https://bit.ly/3cx9OOL and receive an eBook GIFT. Support this channel by enjoying a wide-range of useful & FUN Gadgets at https://twitter.com/GadgetzGuy  Support our series by purchasing any product on Amazon using this FREE entry LINK https://amzn.to/3k8qrGM (Amazon gives us credit at no extra charge to you). It costs you nothing to shop using this FREE store entry link and by doing so encourages, supports & helps us to create more quality content for this series. Thanks! Mark Vinet's TIMELINE video channel at https://youtube.com/c/TIMELINE_MarkVinet Website: https://markvinet.com/podcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/denarynovels Twitter: https://twitter.com/TIMELINEchannel Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mark.vinet.9 YouTube Podcast Playlist: https://www.bit.ly/34tBizu Podcast: https://parthenonpodcast.com/history-of-north-america TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@historyofnorthamerica Books: https://amzn.to/3k8qrGM Linktree: https://linktr.ee/WadeOrganization       See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Professor Richard Susskind, advisor to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, has been alerting the legal profession to the advance of technology since the 1990s. In this episode, Rosalind English discusses with Professor Susskind the present and the future for solicitors, barristers and even the judiciary, in the presence of Artificial Intelligence, which is rapidly overtaking traditional ways of delivering solutions to problems via human agents. Plus: we want your feedback! Please take a couple of minutes to fill in this very short anonymous survey. Thank you in advance. www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/LawPodUK Law Pod UK is published by 1 Crown Office Row. Supporting articles, with links to cases, are published on the UK Human Rights Blog. Follow and message the podcast via Twitter. Subscribe on your favourite podcast platform.

To celebrate the two-year anniversary of Pioneers and Pathfinders, we welcome a very special guest—Professor Richard Susskind OBE. For those who have been engaged in the discussions around legal tech for the past few decades, Richard needs no introduction. He is one of the most advanced thinkers on the impact of technology on the profession, and has been challenging our notions about what it will mean to be a lawyer for a long time. Richard is an adviser, speaker, and author who was focused on legal tech and the future of the profession long before these subjects were top of mind in the industry. In the 1980s, he wrote his doctorate at Oxford University on artificial intelligence, and today, his main area of expertise continues to be the impact of AI and other technologies on the legal profession. Among other roles, Richard is President of the Society for Computers and Law, and Technology Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. He is also an adviser to leading professional firms, in-house legal departments, and governments and judiciaries around the world. He is a frequent speaker at conferences, seminars, retreats, and other events, having been invited to lecture in more than 60 countries. Richard has written 10 books and has contributed more than 150 articles to The Times of London. His most recent publication is the third edition of Tomorrow's Lawyers, which guides legal professionals through the imminent future of law, and calls upon the next generation of lawyers to embrace technology in order to improve current legal and court services. In our conversation, Richard discusses the ways we should all be thinking about legal innovation, the challenges of training lawyers for the future, and the qualifications of those likely to develop breakthrough technologies in law, as well as his own journey and how he became interested in AI as an undergraduate student.

The journey from our town to the metropolis was a journey of about five hours. It was a little past midday when the four-horse stagecoach by which I was a passenger, got into the ravel of traffic frayed out about the Cross Keys, Wood Street, Cheapside, London.We Britons had at that time particularly settled that it was treasonable to doubt our having and our being the best of everything: otherwise, while I was scared by the immensity of London, I think I might have had some faint doubts whether it was not rather ugly, crooked, narrow, and dirty.Mr. Jaggers had duly sent me his address; it was, Little Britain, and he had written after it on his card, “just out of Smithfield, and close by the coach office.” Nevertheless, a hackney coachman, who seemed to have as many capes to his greasy greatcoat as he was years old, packed me up in his coach and hemmed me in with a folding and jingling barrier of steps, as if he were going to take me fifty miles. His getting on his box, which I remember to have been decorated with an old weather-stained pea-green hammercloth moth-eaten into rags, was quite a work of time. It was a wonderful equipage, with six great coronets outside, and ragged things behind for I don't know how many footmen to hold on by, and a harrow below them, to prevent amateur footmen from yielding to the temptation.I had scarcely had time to enjoy the coach and to think how like a straw-yard it was, and yet how like a rag-shop, and to wonder why the horses' nosebags were kept inside, when I observed the coachman beginning to get down, as if we were going to stop presently. And stop we presently did, in a gloomy street, at certain offices with an open door, whereon was painted Mr. Jaggers.“How much?” I asked the coachman.The coachman answered, “A shilling⁠—unless you wish to make it more.”I naturally said I had no wish to make it more.“Then it must be a shilling,” observed the coachman. “I don't want to get into trouble. I know him!” He darkly closed an eye at Mr. Jaggers's name, and shook his head.When he had got his shilling, and had in course of time completed the ascent to his box, and had got away (which appeared to relieve his mind), I went into the front office with my little portmanteau in my hand and asked, Was Mr. Jaggers at home?“He is not,” returned the clerk. “He is in Court at present. Am I addressing Mr. Pip?”I signified that he was addressing Mr. Pip.“Mr. Jaggers left word, would you wait in his room. He couldn't say how long he might be, having a case on. But it stands to reason, his time being valuable, that he won't be longer than he can help.”With those words, the clerk opened a door, and ushered me into an inner chamber at the back. Here, we found a gentleman with one eye, in a velveteen suit and knee-breeches, who wiped his nose with his sleeve on being interrupted in the perusal of the newspaper.“Go and wait outside, Mike,” said the clerk.I began to say that I hoped I was not interrupting, when the clerk shoved this gentleman out with as little ceremony as I ever saw used, and tossing his fur cap out after him, left me alone.Mr. Jaggers's room was lighted by a skylight only, and was a most dismal place; the skylight, eccentrically pitched like a broken head, and the distorted adjoining houses looking as if they had twisted themselves to peep down at me through it. There were not so many papers about, as I should have expected to see; and there were some odd objects about, that I should not have expected to see⁠—such as an old rusty pistol, a sword in a scabbard, several strange-looking boxes and packages, and two dreadful casts on a shelf, of faces peculiarly swollen, and twitchy about the nose. Mr. Jaggers's own high-backed chair was of deadly black horsehair, with rows of brass nails round it, like a coffin; and I fancied I could see how he leaned back in it, and bit his forefinger at the clients. The room was but small, and the clients seemed to have had a habit of backing up against the wall; the wall, especially opposite to Mr. Jaggers's chair, being greasy with shoulders. I recalled, too, that the one-eyed gentleman had shuffled forth against the wall when I was the innocent cause of his being turned out.I sat down in the cliental chair placed over against Mr. Jaggers's chair, and became fascinated by the dismal atmosphere of the place. I called to mind that the clerk had the same air of knowing something to everybody else's disadvantage, as his master had. I wondered how many other clerks there were upstairs, and whether they all claimed to have the same detrimental mastery of their fellow-creatures. I wondered what was the history of all the odd litter about the room, and how it came there. I wondered whether the two swollen faces were of Mr. Jaggers's family, and, if he were so unfortunate as to have had a pair of such ill-looking relations, why he stuck them on that dusty perch for the blacks and flies to settle on, instead of giving them a place at home. Of course I had no experience of a London summer day, and my spirits may have been oppressed by the hot exhausted air, and by the dust and grit that lay thick on everything. But I sat wondering and waiting in Mr. Jaggers's close room, until I really could not bear the two casts on the shelf above Mr. Jaggers's chair, and got up and went out.When I told the clerk that I would take a turn in the air while I waited, he advised me to go round the corner and I should come into Smithfield. So I came into Smithfield; and the shameful place, being all asmear with filth and fat and blood and foam, seemed to stick to me. So, I rubbed it off with all possible speed by turning into a street where I saw the great black dome of Saint Paul's bulging at me from behind a grim stone building which a bystander said was Newgate Prison. Following the wall of the jail, I found the roadway covered with straw to deaden the noise of passing vehicles; and from this, and from the quantity of people standing about smelling strongly of spirits and beer, I inferred that the trials were on.While I looked about me here, an exceedingly dirty and partially drunk minister of justice asked me if I would like to step in and hear a trial or so: informing me that he could give me a front place for half a crown, whence I should command a full view of the Lord Chief Justice in his wig and robes⁠—mentioning that awful personage like waxwork, and presently offering him at the reduced price of eighteen-pence. As I declined the proposal on the plea of an appointment, he was so good as to take me into a yard and show me where the gallows was kept, and also where people were publicly whipped, and then he showed me the Debtors' Door, out of which culprits came to be hanged; heightening the interest of that dreadful portal by giving me to understand that “four on 'em” would come out at that door the day after tomorrow at eight in the morning, to be killed in a row. This was horrible, and gave me a sickening idea of London; the more so as the Lord Chief Justice's proprietor wore (from his hat down to his boots and up again to his pocket handkerchief inclusive) mildewed clothes which had evidently not belonged to him originally, and which I took it into my head he had bought cheap of the executioner. Under these circumstances I thought myself well rid of him for a shilling.I dropped into the office to ask if Mr. Jaggers had come in yet, and I found he had not, and I strolled out again. This time, I made the tour of Little Britain, and turned into Bartholomew Close; and now I became aware that other people were waiting about for Mr. Jaggers, as well as I. There were two men of secret appearance lounging in Bartholomew Close, and thoughtfully fitting their feet into the cracks of the pavement as they talked together, one of whom said to the other when they first passed me, that “Jaggers would do it if it was to be done.” There was a knot of three men and two women standing at a corner, and one of the women was crying on her dirty shawl, and the other comforted her by saying, as she pulled her own shawl over her shoulders, “Jaggers is for him, 'Melia, and what more could you have?” There was a red-eyed little Jew who came into the Close while I was loitering there, in company with a second little Jew whom he sent upon an errand; and while the messenger was gone, I remarked this Jew, who was of a highly excitable temperament, performing a jig of anxiety under a lamppost and accompanying himself, in a kind of frenzy, with the words, “O Jaggerth, Jaggerth, Jaggerth! all otherth ith Cag-Maggerth, give me Jaggerth!” These testimonies to the popularity of my guardian made a deep impression on me, and I admired and wondered more than ever.At length, as I was looking out at the iron gate of Bartholomew Close into Little Britain, I saw Mr. Jaggers coming across the road towards me. All the others who were waiting saw him at the same time, and there was quite a rush at him. Mr. Jaggers, putting a hand on my shoulder and walking me on at his side without saying anything to me, addressed himself to his followers.First, he took the two secret men.“Now, I have nothing to say to you,” said Mr. Jaggers, throwing his finger at them. “I want to know no more than I know. As to the result, it's a tossup. I told you from the first it was a tossup. Have you paid Wemmick?”“We made the money up this morning, sir,” said one of the men, submissively, while the other perused Mr. Jaggers's face.“I don't ask you when you made it up, or where, or whether you made it up at all. Has Wemmick got it?”“Yes, sir,” said both the men together.“Very well; then you may go. Now, I won't have it!” said Mr. Jaggers, waving his hand at them to put them behind him. “If you say a word to me, I'll throw up the case.”“We thought, Mr. Jaggers⁠—” one of the men began, pulling off his hat.“That's what I told you not to do,” said Mr. Jaggers. “You thought! I think for you; that's enough for you. If I want you, I know where to find you; I don't want you to find me. Now I won't have it. I won't hear a word.”The two men looked at one another as Mr. Jaggers waved them behind again, and humbly fell back and were heard no more.“And now you!” said Mr. Jaggers, suddenly stopping, and turning on the two women with the shawls, from whom the three men had meekly separated⁠—“Oh! Amelia, is it?”“Yes, Mr. Jaggers.”“And do you remember,” retorted Mr. Jaggers, “that but for me you wouldn't be here and couldn't be here?”“O yes, sir!” exclaimed both women together. “Lord bless you, sir, well we knows that!”“Then why,” said Mr. Jaggers, “do you come here?”“My Bill, sir!” the crying woman pleaded.“Now, I tell you what!” said Mr. Jaggers. “Once for all. If you don't know that your Bill's in good hands, I know it. And if you come here bothering about your Bill, I'll make an example of both your Bill and you, and let him slip through my fingers. Have you paid Wemmick?”“O yes, sir! Every farden.”“Very well. Then you have done all you have got to do. Say another word⁠—one single word⁠—and Wemmick shall give you your money back.”This terrible threat caused the two women to fall off immediately. No one remained now but the excitable Jew, who had already raised the skirts of Mr. Jaggers's coat to his lips several times.“I don't know this man!” said Mr. Jaggers, in the same devastating strain: “What does this fellow want?”“Ma thear Mithter Jaggerth. Hown brother to Habraham Latharuth?”“Who's he?” said Mr. Jaggers. “Let go of my coat.”The suitor, kissing the hem of the garment again before relinquishing it, replied, “Habraham Latharuth, on thuthpithion of plate.”“You're too late,” said Mr. Jaggers. “I am over the way.”“Holy father, Mithter Jaggerth!” cried my excitable acquaintance, turning white, “don't thay you're again Habraham Latharuth!”“I am,” said Mr. Jaggers, “and there's an end of it. Get out of the way.”“Mithter Jaggerth! Half a moment! My hown cuthen'th gone to Mithter Wemmick at thith prethent minute, to hoffer him hany termth. Mithter Jaggerth! Half a quarter of a moment! If you'd have the condethenthun to be bought off from the t'other thide⁠—at hany thuperior prithe!⁠—money no object!⁠—Mithter Jaggerth⁠—Mithter⁠—!”My guardian threw his supplicant off with supreme indifference, and left him dancing on the pavement as if it were red hot. Without further interruption, we reached the front office, where we found the clerk and the man in velveteen with the fur cap.“Here's Mike,” said the clerk, getting down from his stool, and approaching Mr. Jaggers confidentially.“Oh!” said Mr. Jaggers, turning to the man, who was pulling a lock of hair in the middle of his forehead, like the Bull in Cock Robin pulling at the bell-rope; “your man comes on this afternoon. Well?”“Well, Mas'r Jaggers,” returned Mike, in the voice of a sufferer from a constitutional cold; “arter a deal o' trouble, I've found one, sir, as might do.”“What is he prepared to swear?”“Well, Mas'r Jaggers,” said Mike, wiping his nose on his fur cap this time; “in a general way, anythink.”Mr. Jaggers suddenly became most irate. “Now, I warned you before,” said he, throwing his forefinger at the terrified client, “that if you ever presumed to talk in that way here, I'd make an example of you. You infernal scoundrel, how dare you tell me that?”The client looked scared, but bewildered too, as if he were unconscious what he had done.“Spooney!” said the clerk, in a low voice, giving him a stir with his elbow. “Soft Head! Need you say it face to face?”“Now, I ask you, you blundering booby,” said my guardian, very sternly, “once more and for the last time, what the man you have brought here is prepared to swear?”Mike looked hard at my guardian, as if he were trying to learn a lesson from his face, and slowly replied, “Ayther to character, or to having been in his company and never left him all the night in question.”“Now, be careful. In what station of life is this man?”Mike looked at his cap, and looked at the floor, and looked at the ceiling, and looked at the clerk, and even looked at me, before beginning to reply in a nervous manner, “We've dressed him up like⁠—” when my guardian blustered out⁠—“What? You will, will you?”(“Spooney!” added the clerk again, with another stir.)After some helpless casting about, Mike brightened and began again:⁠—“He is dressed like a 'spectable pieman. A sort of a pastry-cook.”“Is he here?” asked my guardian.“I left him,” said Mike, “a setting on some doorsteps round the corner.”“Take him past that window, and let me see him.”The window indicated was the office window. We all three went to it, behind the wire blind, and presently saw the client go by in an accidental manner, with a murderous-looking tall individual, in a short suit of white linen and a paper cap. This guileless confectioner was not by any means sober, and had a black eye in the green stage of recovery, which was painted over.“Tell him to take his witness away directly,” said my guardian to the clerk, in extreme disgust, “and ask him what he means by bringing such a fellow as that.”My guardian then took me into his own room, and while he lunched, standing, from a sandwich box and a pocket flask of sherry (he seemed to bully his very sandwich as he ate it), informed me what arrangements he had made for me. I was to go to “Barnard's Inn,” to young Mr. Pocket's rooms, where a bed had been sent in for my accommodation; I was to remain with young Mr. Pocket until Monday; on Monday I was to go with him to his father's house on a visit, that I might try how I liked it. Also, I was told what my allowance was to be⁠—it was a very liberal one⁠—and had handed to me from one of my guardian's drawers, the cards of certain tradesmen with whom I was to deal for all kinds of clothes, and such other things as I could in reason want. “You will find your credit good, Mr. Pip,” said my guardian, whose flask of sherry smelt like a whole caskful, as he hastily refreshed himself, “but I shall by this means be able to check your bills, and to pull you up if I find you outrunning the constable. Of course you'll go wrong somehow, but that's no fault of mine.”After I had pondered a little over this encouraging sentiment, I asked Mr. Jaggers if I could send for a coach? He said it was not worth while, I was so near my destination; Wemmick should walk round with me, if I pleased.I then found that Wemmick was the clerk in the next room. Another clerk was rung down from upstairs to take his place while he was out, and I accompanied him into the street, after shaking hands with my guardian. We found a new set of people lingering outside, but Wemmick made a way among them by saying coolly yet decisively, “I tell you it's no use; he won't have a word to say to one of you;” and we soon got clear of them, and went on side by side. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit greatexpectations.substack.com

Today we're joined by English Heritage's Head of Learning and Interpretation Dr Dominique Bouchard and Properties Historians' Team Leader Dr Andrew Hann to talk about a landmark case presided over by Lord Chief Justice, William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield, who lived at Kenwood in north London. He was also a dissenting voice against slavery. Mansfield's ruling in the Somerset v Stewart case in 1772 paved the way for the abolition of slavery in Britain and beyond. To discover more about Kenwood or plan a visit, go to www.english-heritage.org.uk/kenwood

Is Scotland's Gender Recognition bill a progressive step forward, or a threat to women? Joshua Rozenberg investigates the legislation, which removes the need for medical evidence when changing gender and reduces the age at which this can be done. Lawyers in the City of London bring in billions of pounds to the UK economy. English law is popular overseas for its predictability and for the independence of its judges. But is this reputation as a beacon for the rule of law being eroded by a lack of court funding and also by what some see as government undermining the judiciary? Fears raised by the Lord Chief Justice and echoed by the body representing City of London solicitors. And why is there still a pay gap between male and female barristers? Producer: Arlene Gregorius Research: Octavia Woodward and Imogen Serwotka Sound: Graham Puddifoot Production Coordinators: Maria Ogundele and Jacqui Johnson Editor: Hugh Levinson

The first Lord Chief Justice for the State is Catholic unionist Sir Denis Henry, who faces an enormous task in establishing the framework for a new justice system. Meanwhile, two Belfast women are making legal history in a move that only reaches its conclusion a century later, as Northern Ireland's first Lady Chief Justice, Siobhan Keegan, explains.

Pacific travellers could be coming to New Zealand quarantine free from next month; There is anger in Tonga at the appointment of an acting Lord Chief Justice; And Oxfam Pacific urges New Zealand and Australia to align their positions with island countries at COP26.

In this episode of the Brick Court Chambers Centenary podcast series two legal greats discuss their reminiscences of Brick Court and their experience in the field of public inquiries. After a career in practice at Brick Court as a commercial advocate, Nicholas Phillips, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, went on to a judicial career of unparalleled success., occupying all the major judicial offices. He is a former Master of the Rolls, Lord Chief Justice, Senior Law Lord (the last) and President of The Supreme Court (the first). Among many other public inquiries, he presided over the BSE inquiry into Mad Cow Disease from 1998 to 2000. Sir Christopher Clarke QC was Head of Chambers from 1990 to 2004. In practice he was one of the leading commercial advocates of his day, and acted as counsel in a number of inquiries. Most famously he sat as counsel to the Bloody Sunday Inquiry for six years. As a judge he sat in the commercial court for eight years and in the Court of Appeal for four years, retiring in 2017. They discuss, on the basis of their extensive first hand experience, the nature and conduct of public inquiries, including an assessment of how the forthcoming public inquiry into the coronavirus pandemic could and should take place. The podcast is introduced and hosted by Fionn Pilbrow QC.

Full interview: Lord Chief Justice calls for smaller juries to clear courts backlog | Planning battle: We have a duty to build more homes, Jenrick tells Tory heartlands | Pensions shake-up: Rishi Sunak warned off tax raid by senior ministers | Politics liveblog: PM can't keep 'indulging in populist nonsense without funding plan' | Heir or rival?: What does Boris Johnson really think of his Chancellor? | Euro 2020: England into knockouts - but plans in chaos with Mount and Chilwell isolating | HMS Queen Elizabeth: On board the Carrier playing cat and mouse with Russians | William Sitwell: Welcome to woke cuisine, where indignation is only item on the menu | To read all these links and more, take advantage of the final day of our subscription sale - until midnight, pay £1 for 3 months. Here's how.Privacy Policy and California Privacy Notice.

Chaired by Maura McNally SC, day two of the 2021 Chair's Conference focuses on Human Rights & Rule of Law in Ireland, with speakers including: The Hon Mr. Justice Frank Clarke, Chief Justice The Rt. Hon. Sir Declan Morgan, Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Michael McDowell SC, Senator & Former Attorney General Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, Member of UK House of Lords The Bar of Ireland's Chair's Conference is an opportunity for practitioners, academics, policy makers and the wider public to converge on the most defining issue impacting on legal systems and democratic institutions – the rule of law, the protection of human rights against emerging political and societal forces.

A unique and illuminating conversation about the work and legal legacy of Lord Kerr. This episode provides a unique opportunity to hear a wide ranging and animated conversation about the work and legal legacy of Lord Kerr. Host Anurag Deb chairs the exchange with reflections from Lady Brenda Hale, Professor Brice Dickson, Professor Claire Archibold and Ms Monye Anyadike-Danes QC.  The episode touches on his time as Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, his changing judicial philosophy within the Supreme Court and his personal warmth and generosity while also taking in specific analysis of certain key judgements. This gathering of eminent colleagues provides an illuminating portrait of Lord Kerr which is not to be missed. Please download our Additional Show Notes PDF for a full list of resources mentioned in the episode in the sequence in which they are mentioned along with participant biographies. Team Details: Interview: Anurag Deb Participants: Lady Hale, Professor Brice Dickson, Professor Claire Archibold, Ms Monye Anyadike-Danes QC Additional Support: Richard Summerville, Meghan Hoyt and Rachel Thompson

CAST in order of appearance: Liam Mitchell as 1st Groom & John of Lancaster, Amber Devlin as 2nd Groom & Justice Shallow, Ellyn Heald as 3rd Groom, Marty Madden as Sir John Falstaff, Mike Marcou as Pistol, Noah Segard as King Henry V, Rhoda Bodzin as Lord Chief Justice. Facilitated, edited, and with music composed and performed by Ariana Karp.

CAST in order of appearance: Liam Mitchell as Warwick & John of Lancaster, Rhoda Bodzin as Lord Chief Justice, Danielle Reddick as Thomas Duke of Clarence, Samantha Blinn as Humphrey Duke of Gloucester, Noah Segard as King Henry V. Facilitated, edited, and with music composed and performed by Ariana Karp.

CAST in order of appearance: Samantha Blinn as Mistress Quickly, Ellyn Heald as Fang, Amber Devlin as Snare, Marty Madden as Sir John Falstaff, Liam Mitchell as Pageboy, Rhoda Bodzin as Lord Chief Justice, Noah Segard as Thomas Gower. Facilitated, edited, and with music composed and performed by Ariana Karp.

Moving on to Act II of Henry IV, Part II! Among many things, we talk the Hostess and Falstaff’s money and romantic entanglements, the discordant realities between Falstaff and the Lord Chief Justice, the furthering of Hal and Poin’s friendship, the introduction of the glorious Doll Tearsheet and the ferocious and fantastical Pistol, and the poignancy of Hal trying and failing to ‘go back to what it was.’ Our ensemble for Henry IV, Part II includes Samantha Blinn, Rhoda Bodzin, Amber Devlin, Eric Devlin, Ellyn Heald, Marty Madden, Mike Marcou, Liam Mitchell, Danielle Reddick, Noah Segard, facilitated and directed by Ariana Karp.

CAST in order of appearance: Marty Madden as Sir John Falstaff, Liam Mitchell as Pageboy, Rhoda Bodzin as Lord Chief Justice, Noah Segard as Servant. Facilitated, edited, and with music composed and performed by Ariana Karp.

Time to start a new play! Join us as we commence our journey through Henry IV, Part II with our Act I discussion with a brand new ensemble! We discuss the striking appearance of the character of Rumor at the start of the play, the insecurity of information and fake news, Northumberland’s emotional disassociation, the clash of Falstaff and the Lord Chief Justice, and the rebellion’s acrobatic metaphors. Our Ensemble for Henry IV, Part II includes Samantha Blinn, Rhoda Bodzin, Amber Devlin, Eric Devlin, Ellyn Heald, Marty Madden, Mike Marcou, Liam Mitchell, Danielle Reddick, Noah Segard, facilitated and directed by Ariana Karp.

Hello everyone! In this episode, Vik and Sloan teach each other a topic of their choice and answer some of our listener's questions about us and the podcast. Expect to hear about Viktoria's opinions on cucumber sandwiches and Kylo Ren, learn about how the creation of the postal system lead to the massive Valentine's industry, and much more. Relevant Resources and links: Becoming Jane (movie) Belle (Movie) Dinner with Mr. Darcy by Pen Vogler: Dinner with Mr Darcy: Recipes inspired by the novels and letters of Jane Austen: Vogler, Pen: 9781782490562: Books - Amazon.ca The Letters of Jane Austen- Collected and Edited by Deirdre Le Faye- The Letters of Jane Austen :: Jane Austen's Letters, 3d edition :: [The Letters] (macewan.ca) The Real Jane Austen: A Life in Small Things by Paula Byrne- The Real Jane Austen: A Life in Small Things: Byrne, Paula: 9780061999109: Books - Amazon.ca Belle: The Slave Daughter and the Lord Chief Justice by Paula Byrne- Belle: The Slave Daughter and the Lord Chief Justice: Byrne, Paula: Books - Amazon.ca Jane Austen and the Abolitionist Turn by Patricia A. Matthew- https://library.macewan.ca/full-record/hlh/139978842 Vincent, David. Literacy and Popular Culture: England 1750–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 44, 45: Literacy and Popular Culture: England 1750-1914, Book by David Vincent (Paperback) | www.chapters.indigo.ca Young Man's Valentine Writer: https://library.macewan.ca/full-record/cat00565a/5027917 You can find us on all our social media here. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IHGatMacewan/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HistatMac Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/historyatmac/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcsB7Q-NyysE7TiR7vN442A?app=desktop Website: https://interdisciplinaryh.wixsite.com/mysite Support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/interdis_hist If you have an idea for an episode, wish to partner with us, or have an idea for a topic you want to see us cover, please shoot us an email at interdisciplinaryhistgroupmu@gmail.com. We would also appreciate it if you took the time to share our podcast with your friends and family if you have the chance, or please leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It is so important and helps us a lot. We really appreciate it. Thank you for listening! Stay safe and wear a mask! Love Vik and Sloan --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/interdis-history-group/message

This week in Episode 5 of the Legal Genie Podcast, your host, Lara Quie, is joined by Sara Carnegie, Director of Legal Projects at the International Bar Association.Sara has spent the bulk of her career working with the public sector in collaboration with influential government ministers, officials, the senior judiciary, lawyers, and law enforcement on a range of issues. She was the Director of Strategic Policy, at the Crown Prosecution Service and Legal Advisor to the Senior Presiding Judge, which involved leading the judicial team and working with the Lord Chief Justice, Government, and key stakeholders to implement broadcasting in the Court of Appeal.She has also led the legal teams for two high profile and sensitive public inquiries (the Detainee Inquiry and the Baha Mousa Enquiry), resulting in far-reaching change across relevant government departments. She sits in a judicial capacity on the council of the Inns of Court Disciplinary Tribunal and the Advisory Board for the National Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse.Her current role as Director of Legal Projects at the International Bar Association involves working in a global capacity leading a legal team who research, develop, and implement innovative projects relevant to business, the rule of law, the global legal profession and wider community. Significant projects include bullying, sexual harassment, and addressing mental wellbeing in the legal profession, modern slavery and cybersecurity. Sara is currently a member of the IBA Diversity and Inclusion Council and Rule of Law Forum and plays a central role in running initiatives and events to support both entities.In this episode she shares:Her background and why she became a barristerHer pupillage and challenges at the criminal barMoving into the civil service and prosecuting for Revenue & Customs prosecutions officeMotherhood and juggling a legal careerWorking in the civil service and public enquiries Her role as Legal advisor to the Senior Presiding Judge and bringing broadcasting into the Royal Courts of JusticeHer fascination with crimeHer role as Director of strategic policy at the Crown Prosecution Service and having a resilient mindsetMoving into the not-for-profit sector and her work at the International Bar AssociationThe importance of building relationshipsThe importance of mental health and wellbeing Having passion and purpose Her key advice for young lawyers You can connect with Sara Carnegie on her LinkedIn at:https://www.linkedin.com/in/sara-carnegie-93942898 You can connect with Lara Quie on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/laraquieEmail: Lara@LaraQAssociates.comOr her website: https://www.laraqassociates.comPlease subscribe and review the podcast so that others can find it. You may also enjoy Lara's other podcast, The Coach Potatoes, which can be found here:https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/coach-potatoes-podcast/id1529949563 

The pandemic has pushed many working mothers to breaking point. Juggling family and career is nothing new, but working a full-time job while simultaneously home schooling children for many weeks is unprecedented. A recent TUC report revealed that women are shouldering the lion's share of this responsibility, and that a lack of employer flexibility has left mums in an impossible situation. So how are these women coping? And for those that aren't, why do they feel so reluctant to talk about their struggles? Emma Barnett speaks to mum-of-three Annie about her experience. She's also joined by Sam Smethers, who recently stepped back from her role as chief executive of the Fawcett Society, and Leann Cross, the Director of Homestart in Greenwich. Christine Keeler: the woman who nearly brought down the government in the 60s. She had an affair with Secretary of State for War, John Profumo, when she was just 19. In an unconnected court case, but one which is also linked in a complicated saga, she ended up being sentenced to nine months in prison. She had been found guilty of perjury and obstructing the course of justice in the trial of a man who her son, Seymour Platt, says was obsessed with her. But now Seymour wants a pardon for his mother. Next month he'll send his legal application to the Lord Chief Justice. Presenter: Emma Barnett Producer: Kirsty Starkey Interviewed Guest: Sam Smethers Interviewed Guest: Leann Cross Interviewed Guest: Seymour Platt

In this fifth episode of our series of commercial litigation update podcasts, we briefly outline the state of play for Brexit as it affects litigation in the English courts. We also look at some developments since our last update relating to the disclosure pilot, witness evidence reform and remote hearings, and finally we look at some developments relating to so-called “class action tourism” where group claims are pursued against large multinational companies in the English courts in relation to alleged acts or omissions of their subsidiaries abroad, often relating to environmental or human rights issues. This episode is hosted by Anna Pertoldi, a partner in our litigation team, who is joined by Maura McIntosh, a professional support consultant, and Joanne Keillor, a senior associate. Below you can find links to our blog posts on the developments and cases covered in this podcast . • Article published – Jurisdiction clauses and service out post-Brexit: a welcome rule change https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/11/12/article-published-jurisdiction-clauses-and-service-out-post-brexit-a-welcome-rule-change/ • Webinar on jurisdiction and enforcement issues https://hsf.vids.io/videos/ac9cd7b81f14e9c725/brexit-training-recording-jurisdiction-and-enforcement • Article published – Disclosure Pilot Scheme: a potential way forward? https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/09/30/article-published-disclosure-pilot-scheme-a-potential-way-forward/ • Article published – Preparing witness evidence: significant changes proposed for Business and Property Courts https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/09/24/article-published-preparing-witness-evidence-significant-changes-proposed-for-business-and-property-courts/ • Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2020: courts in strong position despite pandemic https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/11/04/lord-chief-justices-report-2020-courts-in-strong-position-despite-pandemic/ • High Court strikes out claims against BHP as an abuse of process in light of parallel claims in Brazil https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/11/17/high-court-strikes-out-claims-against-bhp-as-an-abuse-of-process-in-light-of-parallel-claims-in-brazil/ • Court of Appeal confirms English Court lacks jurisdiction over claims against UK domiciled parent company in relation to acts of subsidiary abroad https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2018/02/19/court-of-appeal-confirms-english-court-lacks-jurisdiction-over-claims-against-uk-domiciled-parent-company-in-relation-to-acts-of-subsidiary-abroad/

In this episode, Prof Kieran McEvoy and Dr Cheryl Lawther discuss official and grassroots approaches to truth recovery in Northern Ireland. Transitional Justice Series 2 - In this episode, Prof Kieran McEvoy and Dr Cheryl Lawther discuss official and grassroots approaches to truth recovery in Northern Ireland, the politics of – and challenges facing – efforts to recover truth in this context, and the current status of efforts to ‘deal with' the legacy of the Northern Ireland conflict. For a slightly different take on the themes discussed, you can read Cheryl Lawther's article in the International Review of Victimology on ‘Haunting and Transitional Justice'. In this LawPod episode, Cheryl references a BBC Red Lines interview with Northern Ireland's Lord Chief Justice, Sir Declan Morgan. You can access that here.

The former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Lord Thomas, has made a strong attack on the Government's plan to override parts of the Brexit withdrawal agreement.

Mark speaks to Sir Declan Morgan, NI's Lord Chief Justice

How can the courts cope with the constraints of Coronavirus? That’s the challenge facing Lord Burnett of Maldon, head of the judiciary in England and Wales. Joshua Rozenberg asks the Lord Chief Justice whether new ways of working can deliver justice at a time of crisis. Among those innovations is mediation, Law in Action speaks to a court-based mediator and a court user whose case was resolved without leaving home. And we find out how lockdown is changing the civil courts. Can remote hearings work effectively? Researcher: Diane Richardson Producer: Neil Koenig

More great books at LoyalBooks.com

Ever since the publication of his seminal 1996 book, The Future of Law, Richard Susskind has remained the world’s most-recognized and most-respected speaker and author on the future of legal services. But even he could not have foreseen the sudden relevance of his latest book, Online Courts and the Future of Justice.  On this episode of LawNext, Susskind joins host Bob Ambrogi for a conversation about the legal profession and the judicial system in a time of global pandemic. Will the pandemic fast-forward law’s leap into the future? Will there be fundamental change in legal services delivery? Will courts move online more quickly than even he had thought? Susskind shares his thoughts on these questions and more. Susskind is an author, speaker, and independent adviser to major professional firms and national governments. His main area of expertise is the future of professional service and, in particular, the ways in which technology and the Internet are changing the work of lawyers. He has worked on legal technology for over 30 years.  Susskind has, since 1998, been IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. He is president of the Society for Computers and Law, chair of the Online Dispute Resolution Advisory Group of the Civil Justice Council, and chair of the Advisory Board of the Oxford Internet Institute, where he is also a visiting professor. He also holds professorships at UCL, Gresham College, London, and the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow. NEW: Comment on this show: Record a voice comment on your mobile phone and send it to info@lawnext.com. We are now on Patreon! Subscribe to our page to be able to access show transcripts, or to submit a question for our guests. Thank you to our sponsor, MyCase, and to John E. Grant and Agile Professionals LLC for being a lead Patreon supporter of our show.

The Gang may not be in the same room, but that won't stop them from delivering an episode of the most slightly special podcast ever- Great Morning! In this week's episode, the gang discusses: recording the podcast over the computer, how to be a lawyer, the Lord Chief Justice of England, and Bernie Sanders! Stay safe out there folks! Rebuild!

EG's deputy legal editor Jess Harrold and court reporter James Lumley discuss how the Royal Courts of Justice and the Business and Property Courts at the Rolls Building plan to keep the wheels of justice turning during the Covid-19 pandemic - including the Lord Chief Justice's call for a renewed emphasis on remote court hearings and settling disputes where possible.

Lord Thomas Bingham of Cornhill was described in his obituary as the greatest English judge since the Second World War. He was the first modern judge to hold all of the positions of Master of the Rolls, Lord Chief Justice, and Senior Law Lord. In this lecture, the Honourable Justice James Edelman pays tribute to the life and legacy of Lord Thomas Bingham. His Honour considers the elements of style, intelligence, patience, humility and respect that combined to make Lord Bingham one of the greatest judges of the modern era. For more information on this lecture and on the Selden Society, visit the Supreme Court Library Queensland website https://legalheritage.sclqld.org.au/lecture-seven-lord-binghamSupport the show (https://legalheritage.sclqld.org.au/membership-information)

Lord Thomas was called to the bar in 1969 and after a long and distinguished career became Chief Justice of England and Wales between 2013 and 2017.  In this interview we talk about his early career and what led him to that role and what he is involved in today and what it is like being a peer in the House of Lords.  We also talk about the place of the Judiciary and role of the Judge.  He was the New Zealand Law Foundation’s 2019 Distinguished Visiting Fellow and visited New Zealand in September 2019 where he spoke at the Canterbury University Law School. In this interview we talk about a variety of topics including constitutional reform, being somewhere where something happens, having a young family and a busy career, changes to the practise of law since he began working, being in Chicago in the late 1960s, what it is like to be a Judge, digitising of the Courts and being involved in Constitutional changes, the role of law schools of the future, as well as joining the House of Lords. Seeds is all about hearing diverse and varying perspectives and life journeys, which is why this interview fits so well with others even if they cover the life story of a Nun, someone who has been trafficked or someone who is 6 years old.  There are many dozens of interviews in the back catalogue now at www.theseeds.nz  A very big thanks to The Law Foundation as well as Canterbury University Law School for arranging this interview (in particular, Stephen Todd, Ursula Cheer, Elizabeth Toomey and Julie Scott). Full Bio: https://arbitratorsinternational.com/arbitrator/lord-thomas-of-cwmgiedd/ Information about the trip: https://www.lawfoundation.org.nz/?p=9731&e=1 From The Law Foundation description: "Lord Thomas read law at Trinity Hall, Cambridge and the University of Chicago Law School and was called to the bar by Gray’s Inn. He practiced at the Commercial Bar in London from 1972 to 1996, becoming a QC in 1984. He was appointed to the High Court of England and Wales in 1996. He was successively a Presiding Judge in Wales, Judge in Charge of the Commercial Court, the Senior Presiding Judge for England and Wales, a Lord Justice of Appeal, President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales (2013 - 2017). He was a founder of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary and its President from 2008-2010. He is currently Chairman of the Commission on Justice in Wales, Chairman of the London Financial Markets Law Committee and President of the Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre. He also sits in the House of Lords. He has returned to Essex Court Chambers where he practices as an arbitrator. He is Chancellor of the Aberystwyth University and is an honorary fellow of several universities. He is a founder member of the European Law Institute and is currently a member of its Executive Committee."  

Going Direct Feedback review (5/5 stars): Denise S of Arizona: Sandy was patient, concise, and gave me details that resonated with what is going on in my life at this time. I was amazed how spot on the reading was and am looking forward to learning more about astrology and how it affects my future. Very excited about the next class! In The Transits Tue June 4    Mercury ingress into Cancer: Sensitive Words Fri June 7   Mercury sextile Uranus: Bite Your Tongue Sat June 8 Venus ingress Gemini: Be Adaptable Sun June 9 Sun square Neptune: Turn On The Sprinkler Mon June 10 Sun opposing Jupiter: Act As You Please (Well, Sort Of) Talisman Times: FINISHED: New Moon in Gemini: To speak and listen to spiritual messages. UPCOMING: Mercury sextile Uranus: To understand and reply progressively. Moon trine Jupiter: To accept the good nature of others. Moon conjunct Venus: To attract a solid and stable love partner. Sun opposing Jupiter: To finally embody confidence. On the Horizon: June 6 Dr. Laura Berman Radio: Call-ins! Questions@uncoveredradio.com June 22 Cosmic Trends Q3- Astrology Online and In-Person Event September 19-23 Unhustle Retreat in Lake Tahoe Our House: Alex and Sandy discuss the newest medical diagnosis of BURNOUT and the top three symptoms you should know! Alex also explains the last episode’s title: The Grand Poobah and her discoveries. Then current events in Sandy and Alex’s world! **Burnout is now a medical diagnosis // AMA Today Show? According to the handbook, doctors can diagnose someone with burnout if they meet the following symptoms: 1. feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion 2. increased mental distance from one's job, or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to one's job 3. reduced professional efficacy Before making the call, the document says doctors should first rule out adjustment disorder as well as anxiety and mood disorders. And the diagnosis is limited to work environments, and shouldn't be applied to other life situations. The Grand Poobah- who is it? A term derived from the name of the haughty character Pooh-Bah in Gilbert and Sullivan's The Mikado (1885).[1] In this comic opera, Pooh-Bah holds numerous exalted offices, including "First Lord of the Treasury, Lord Chief Justice, Commander-in-Chief, Lord High Admiral ... Archbishop ... Lord Mayor" and "Lord High Everything Else". The name has come to be used as a mocking title for someone self-important or locally high-ranking and who either exhibits an inflated self-regard or who has limited authority while taking impressive titles.   Take a moment to look at Sandy's incredibly beautiful talismans, crafted using ancient millefiori techniques at the Intention Beads website: https://www.intentionbeads.com/ ...and let us know how our intentions impact your life on our social media: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/intention_beads/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/intentionbeads/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/astrointentions Email: info@intentionbeads.com   Subscribe on: iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/astrological-intentions/id1413036335?mt=2 Stitcher: http://www.stitcher.com/s?fid=215045&refid=stpr Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/listen#/ps/Io3oiwynlpjjvovpcmwb7vuojym If you would like to start a podcast in Chicago, reach out to JAZZFUZZ: https://jazzfuzz.com

In his first interview since taking office, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Sir Ian Burnett talks to Joshua Rozenberg. He explains what can be done to gain back public confidence. Also, if you are a foster carer, are you an employee or a worker? How a Scottish couple fought to have their status changed. Katie Gollop QC in conversation with Nemone Lethbridge who was called to the Bar nearly sixty years ago. She remembers why she was not allowed to use one particular facility in Chambers. Finally, as Paddington comes to the big screen again, immigration barrister Colin Yeo explains what the Peruvian bear's status is in England. Paddington 2 is directed by Paul King and produced by StudioCanal. Producers: Diane Richardson & Smita Patel Editor: Richard Vadon.

“The question is not can a machine exhibit empathy or judgement but instead for what problems are empathy, judgement, or creativity the solution?” -Richard Susskind After years of writing and thinking about the future of the legal profession, Richard Susskind began to run into legal professionals whose careers are being affected by technology. In addition to lawyers, those in the medical, architecture, financial, and other fields have begun to notice a shift in the provision of professional services. Richard got together with his son, Daniel Susskind, at the time working in justice policy, education policy, and health policy for the British Prime Minister, to examine how technology is increasingly playing a fundamental role in how all service-based professions work. They recently published a book on the subject called “The Future of the Professions.” In this episode of The Digital Edge, Sharon Nelson and Jim Calloway interview Richard and Daniel Susskind about their new book and key topics within that might interest lawyers who wish to prepare for the future. They discuss a “grand bargain” concept of exclusivity, the capability of machines to replace cognitive, physical/manual, and emotional skills currently provided by human professionals, and the right questions to ask about the future of legal services. Are there any tasks that computers won't be able to do? Topics include: Society's expectation for affordable, accessible, and reliable professional services Computers and artificial intelligence as a threat to the legal profession Professionals to be redeployed into new roles Embedded knowledge Free sharing of information through online avenues Incremental changes versus complete changes Commercial and social circumstances of the current systems Professor Richard Susskind is an author, speaker, and independent advisor to international professional firms and national governments. He is president for the Society for Computers and Law, IT advisor to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, and chair of the Oxford Internet Institute Advisory Board. His books include the best sellers, “The End of Lawyers?” and “Tomorrow's Lawyers.” Daniel Susskind is a lecturer in economics at Balliol College, University of Oxford, where he researches and teaches, and from where he has two degrees in economics. He was also a Kennedy Scholar at Harvard University. Previously, he worked for the British government as a policy adviser in the Prime Minister's Strategy Unit and as a senior policy adviser at the Cabinet Office. Special thanks to our sponsors, ServeNow and CloudMask.

MISAN SAGAY SCREENWRITER OF BELLE; THEIR EYES WAS WATCHING GOD. Misan Sagay’s screenwriting credits include Secret Laughter of Women, a full-length screenplay written and produced by O.O. Sagay (Elba Films) with Handmade Films, which premiered at the London Film Festival in 1999, and Their Eyes Were Watching God, an adaptation for Harpo Films/HBO for ABC starring Halle Berry. She also has a number of films in development including Fela (Focus Features) and In the Shadow of a Saint.   Select Links Below: Huffington Post Article By Misan Sagay Films: "Belle – Bringing Slavery Into the Heart of Jane Austen" – Misan Sagay – Screenwriter Belle – Gugu Mbatha-Raw Their Eyes Were Watching God – Halle Berry The Secret Laughter of Woman – Nia Long Film Facts: Film: Belle Belle – Written by Misan Sagay, BELLE is inspired by the true story of Dido Elizabeth Belle (Gugu Mbatha-Raw), the illegitimate mixed race daughter of Admiral Sir John Lindsay (Matthew Goode). Raised by her aristocratic great-uncle Lord Mansfield (Tom Wilkinson) and his wife (Emily Watson), Belle's lineage affords her certain privileges, yet her status prevents her from the traditions of noble social standing. While her cousin Elizabeth (Sarah Gadon) chases suitors for marriage, Belle is left on the sidelines wondering if she will ever find love. After meeting an idealistic young vicar's son bent on changing society, he and Belle help shape Lord Mansfield's role as Lord Chief Justice to end slavery in England. (c) Fox Searchlight Belle The Movie *(Rotten Tomatoes – rottentomatoes.com/m/belle_2014/ ) Notes: *Misan Sagay received sole writing credit on the film, Belle, following arbitration by the Writers Guild of America, (WGA). *Additional article  (WGA) – Writers Guild of America Article – Written By – Magazine Film: Their Eyes Were Watching God –A drama set in the 1920s, where free-spirited Janie Crawford's search for happiness leads her through several different marriages, challenging the morals of her small town. Based on the novel by Zora Neale Hurston.Film: The Secret Laughter of Woman – A beautiful young single mother feels the pressure from the ex-pat Nigerian community to get married. Her precocious son has met his hero, a cynical English comic book writer and decides he is a match for his mum. The fall for each other but their love is tested by resistance from the community.#SupportScreenwriters #SupportWomenInFilm   Select Links Below:   Thank You for checking out Hollywood Breakthrough Show! This podcast main purpose is to serve up positive information without shade. There are thousands of great Films & TV shows with, Staff Writers, Editors, Cinematographer, Actors, Set Designers, and Make-up Artist just to name a few. Join us at Hollywood Breakthrough Show, as we interview some of the most talented people in the business, which names you may, or may not know! But you have seen their work! Whether they're well- established veterans of the business, or current up and comers, these are the people who are making a living in Hollywood. Screenwriters, directors, producers and entertainment industry professionals share inside perspective on writing, filmmaking, breaking into Hollywood and navigating SHOW BUSINESS, along with stories of their journey to success! HELP SPREAD THE WORD PLEASE! SCREENWRITERS, DIRECTORS, AUTHORS, we would love to help spread the word about your Film, Book, Crowdfunding, etc., Contact us! (EMAIL: Info@hollywoodbreakthrough.com ) See Videos of all interviews at Hollywood Breakthrough Please subscribe in iTunes and write us a review! Follow us on  Social Media Sites |  Twitter @TheBreakThur|  Facebook: facebook.com/HollywoodBreakthroughPodcast Please, Subscribe! Also, Please contact us for Interviews or Sponsorship of an episode!  Hollywood Breakthrough Show Website (EMAIL: Info@hollywoodbreakthrough.com ) View Apps Sponsor: Hollywood Hero Agent Fenix Hill Pro Scottie The Baby Dino    

The Rt Hon Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, discusses alternatives to custody. Cumberland Lodge www.cumberlandlodge.ac.uk is the home of an educational charity, founded in 1947 to promote ethical discussion and cross-disciplinary collaboration Registered charity: 1108677

All this week Melvyn Bragg and guests are discussing ideas of Justice. Today lawyer Harry Potter uses the ideas of the philosopher Kant to ask whether deterrent prison sentences are just. He takes us back to the 1700s, when hundreds of petty offences carried the death penalty. And Gordon Finlayson from the University of Sussex explains how Kant's idea that you should never treat people as a means to an end would put him at odds with our justice system today, where people can receive heavy sentences in order to put others off committing the same crime. To see whether Kant's ideas and our justice system can be reconciled, Harry visits Lord Judge who was Lord Chief Justice at the time of the London riots of 2011, when deterrent sentences were handed down. He explains how sentences are determined. Producer: Melvin Rickarby.

Institute of Commonwealth Studies Conference on Legal and Judicial Legacies of Empire Keynote speaker Chairman: Professor Philip Murphy Speaker: The Rt Hon The Lord Judge, PC, QC, (former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales) Some Thou...

Institute of Commonwealth Studies Conference on Legal and Judicial Legacies of Empire Keynote speaker Chairman: Professor Philip Murphy Speaker: The Rt Hon The Lord Judge, PC, QC, (former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales) Some Thou...

Mr Burns at London's Almeida Theatre is a play about an America without electrical power, the end of everything in contemporary USA - when the TV programme The Simpsons has passed into folklore. How do we reframe our understanding of fables? Folk art has often been neglected in the story of British art but a new exhibition at Tate Britain attempts to set that right with a range of items from pictures woven from human hair to ship's figureheads and quilts made by Crimean prisoners. British film Belle explores racial attitudes in 18th Century aristocratic circles through the story of Dido Elizabeth Belle, the illegitimate mixed race daughter of a Royal Navy officer. Brought to England to live with his uncle The Lord Chief Justice, she became inadvertently involved in the campaign to abolish slavery. In the Light of What we Know is the debut novel by Zia Haider Rahman that deals with betrayal, revenge, love faith science and war through the relationship between two men across Kabul, New York, Oxford, London and Islamabad. And we look at how the British newspapers are dealing with the World Cup - not the matches and the scores but their depiction of the host country and the preparations, the atmosphere, the heat, the possible unrest... anything and everything bar the results. Tom Sutcliffe is joined by Elif Shafak, Charlotte Mendelson and Barb Jungr. The producer is Oliver Jones.

Join The Gist of Freedom as we talk with historian Stephanie James Wilson, M.A. Stephanie is the Executive Director of the New Jersey Amistad Commission, a division of the Department of Education. The Amistad Commission – NJ Dept. of Education would like to extend to you an invitation to join us at the 2nd free preview screening of the major motion picture“BELLE”.  LIMITED SEATING YOU MUST RSVP Tuesday, May 20, 2014 AMC Clifton Commons 16 405 Route 3 Clifton, New Jersey 07014 Doors open at 6:30 pm Showtime begins at 7:00 pm Dido Belle, the illegitimate mixed-race daughter of a Royal Navy officer, is brought to England by her father and left in the care of his uncle, Lord Mansfield, the Lord Chief Justice, at his estate of Kenwood House. Though the social mores of the time make her an outsider, Dido is raised by Mansfield as an aristocrat alongside her cousin Elizabeth. Dido's burgeoning relationship with a young lawyer, John Davinier, meets with the disapproval of Mansfield who considers the match beneath her. At the same time Mansfield is deliberating on a slavery case (Somerset v Stewart) which will advance the cause of the abolitionists.

Belle is based on the real life story of Dido Elizabeth Belle, the illegitimate mixed race daughter of a Royal Navy admiral and a slave called Maria Belle, raised by her aristocratic great uncle Lord Mansfield, best known as the Lord Chief Justice who ruled slavery illegal in England. Belle negotiates coming of age as an aristocratic woman of colour in Georgian England as another of her uncle’s important anti-slavery cases playing out in the background.

If you like the idea of the above equation, well, you are either looking forward to a Robot vs. Lawyer stand-off, or, like today’s guest, you simply believe that law can be made better and more efficient through the use of software and applications to streamline repetitive legal tasks. Richard Susskind is the IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, and author of the recently published (and provocatively titled) The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. He recently sat down with the Berkman Center’s Brock Rutter to chat about how technology might be able to simultaneously make the work of lawyers more efficient, reduce overhead costs, and improve access to justice. The Reference Section: • Follow Richard’s work • Watch Richard’s recent talk at the Berkman Center’s Law Lab • The recent NYTimes article on the firm that did away with its lawyers CC-licensed music this week: Arslkhan: “Love Odyssey” Coconut Monkeyrocket: “Accidental Beatnik”

Claire Bolderson profiles Lord Justice Leveson, the judge who is leading the public inquiry into the phone hacking scandal and relationships between politicians, journalists and police officers. Brian Leveson was born and brought up in Liverpool and worked there, as a young barrister, for a number of years before becoming a QC. His later career involved some of the biggest commercial trials of the time - among them BCCI, Polly Peck and Barings. He also prosecuted Ken Dodd on behalf of the Inland Revenue and, in a rare setback, he lost the case. And he's turned his hand to the criminal bar and prosecuted one of the UK's most infamous serial killers - Rosemary West. If he handles the public inquiry into phone hacking successfully, many believe he will be one step closer to the ultimate legal prize - the position of Lord Chief Justice. Contributors Judge Henry Globe Dominic Carman Sasha Wass QC Producers: Rosamund Jones Linda Pressly.

Lord Woolf the Lord Chief Justice delivering the Squire Centenary Lecture in the Law Faculty on the evening of March 3 2004.

Lord Woolf the Lord Chief Justice delivering the Squire Centenary Lecture in the Law Faculty on the evening of March 3 2004.

Lord Woolf the Lord Chief Justice delivering the Squire Centenary Lecture in the Law Faculty on the evening of March 3 2004.

Lord Woolf the Lord Chief Justice delivering the Squire Centenary Lecture in the Law Faculty on the evening of March 3 2004.

Fortress Friday During the month of October Fortress Friday will be exploring the paranormal. Throughout Europe there are stories of ghost sightings and strange occurrences. In a 6-part series we will look at some of the most haunted Castles in Europe. The second castle in our series is Malahide Castle, located North of Dublin, Ireland. Roger Talbot was given the land by King Henry II and began building the Castle in 1185. Malahide Castle is home to no fewer than five spirits: Lord Galtrim, Lady Maud Plunkett, Lord Chief Justice, Miles Corbett and Puck. You can listen to the episode below. Or download the MP3 and listen to it on your favorite MP3 player. Subscribe to the feed so you do not miss a single episode. The music was provided by Tim Rayburn. It is available at Magnatune.com Use the icons below to download the .mp3 audio file, subscribe directly to iTunes or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Kirsty Young's castaway this week is the former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Lord Woolf. Throughout his career, he has been at the forefront of shaping our justice system. Following the Strangeways riots in 1990 he issued far-reaching reports on penal reform and his part in authorizing the release of James Bulger's killers attracted huge attention. As Master of the Rolls he made an historic judgement allowing Diane Blood to use her dead husband's sperm to have a child. Lord Woolf's appetite to see justice done was sharpened as a wartime school boy and the only Jew at Fettes College in Edinburgh - he developed an early antipathy towards any perceived unfairness. His school master's contention that being a barrister wasn't the profession for a boy with a stutter only made him more determined to succeed.[Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs]Favourite track: The Prisoner's Chorus from Fidelio by Ludwig van Beethoven Book: The Koran Luxury: A happy photograph of the whole family including the latest grandchildren.

Kirsty Young's castaway this week is the former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Lord Woolf. Throughout his career, he has been at the forefront of shaping our justice system. Following the Strangeways riots in 1990 he issued far-reaching reports on penal reform and his part in authorizing the release of James Bulger's killers attracted huge attention. As Master of the Rolls he made an historic judgement allowing Diane Blood to use her dead husband's sperm to have a child. Lord Woolf's appetite to see justice done was sharpened as a wartime school boy and the only Jew at Fettes College in Edinburgh - he developed an early antipathy towards any perceived unfairness. His school master's contention that being a barrister wasn't the profession for a boy with a stutter only made him more determined to succeed. [Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs] Favourite track: The Prisoner's Chorus from Fidelio by Ludwig van Beethoven Book: The Koran Luxury: A happy photograph of the whole family including the latest grandchildren.

Join Michael McIlwrath and CPR President Kathy Bryan as they discuss with Lord Harry Woolf, England's former Lord Chief Justice, the ADR-centric civil justice reforms he spearheaded in the United Kingdom.

The Right Honorable Lord Woolf of Barnes, the former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Royal Courts of Justice speaks on the topic of " How to Change the Litigation Culture."

A special event marking the launch of a book containing Professor Susskind's interviews at Gresham College with eminent legal figures, including the Lord Chief Justice, three Lord Chancellors and the Senior Law Lord.

Professor Richard Susskind and The Rt Hon Lord Woolf of Barnes discuss the Access to Justice Inquiry and reforms to the civil justice system; the structure of the court system; the process of judging; modernisation of the Judiciary; major challenges facing the justice system and the...

The castaway in Desert Island Discs this week is the country's most senior serving judge Lord Taylor of Gosforth. Recently appointed the Lord Chief Justice of England, he'll be discussing the public's perception of the English legal system, following the recent series of miscarriages of justice; and also, his plans to open up areas of the law and to rid the system of some of its more antiquated trappings, such as wigs and robes. He'll also be talking to Sue Lawley about how, as an accomplished musician, he might well have become a professional pianist rather than the Lord Chief Justice.[Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs] Favourite track: Symphony No 41 in C K 551 by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Book: War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy Luxury: Piano

The castaway in Desert Island Discs this week is the country's most senior serving judge Lord Taylor of Gosforth. Recently appointed the Lord Chief Justice of England, he'll be discussing the public's perception of the English legal system, following the recent series of miscarriages of justice; and also, his plans to open up areas of the law and to rid the system of some of its more antiquated trappings, such as wigs and robes. He'll also be talking to Sue Lawley about how, as an accomplished musician, he might well have become a professional pianist rather than the Lord Chief Justice. [Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs] Favourite track: Symphony No 41 in C K 551 by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Book: War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy Luxury: Piano