Podcasts about Danieli

La Corte federale del commercio ha annullato i dazi imposti da Trump a decine di Paesi, dichiarandoli illegittimi perché basati su un uso improprio della legge Ieepa del 1977. Stop anche alle tariffe su Canada, Messico e Cina. La decisione, nata da ricorsi di 12 Stati USA e piccole imprese tra cui l'importatore di vini VOS Selections, rappresenta la prima vera sconfitta legale della strategia commerciale trumpiana. La Casa Bianca farà appello. Interviene Marco Valsania corrispondente da New York de Il Sole 24 OreFedermeccanica, torna crescita nel trimestre ma zero-virgolaNel primo trimestre 2025 l'industria metalmeccanica italiana mostra un lieve rimbalzo congiunturale (+0,7%) dopo il -1,8% di fine 2024, ma resta in calo su base annua (-5,8%). La produzione industriale nazionale segna +0,4% congiunturale e -3,4% tendenziale. In Europa il comparto resta debole, con l'UE a -0,2%, mentre Germania e Italia crescono moderatamente (+0,4% e +0,7%). L'export metalmeccanico italiano sale dell'1,3% (extra-UE +1,6%, UE +1,1%), con un avanzo commerciale di 11,2 miliardi. Forte la crescita verso la Germania (+7,1%), calo negli USA (-1,1%). Il sentiment resta cauto: solo il 26% prevede crescita produttiva, il 14% assunzioni, il 19% tagli. Il 68% non userà il Piano Transizione 5.0. L'80% delle imprese teme gli effetti dei nuovi dazi USA, soprattutto per l'export e le forniture. Germania (65%) e USA (43%) restano i principali mercati. Il 60% punta a diversificare, ma solo pochi valutano rilocalizzazioni. La fase recessiva si attenua, ma il contesto resta instabile. Interviene a Focus Economia Diego Andreis, Vicepresidente Federmeccanica.Meloni a Samarcanda, accordi per più di 3 miliardi di euro con l'UzbekistanIn visita ufficiale a Samarcanda, la premier Giorgia Meloni e il presidente uzbeko Mirziyoyev hanno siglato una dichiarazione congiunta e 14 accordi bilaterali per un valore complessivo superiore a 3 miliardi di euro. Tra i temi: investimenti, materie prime critiche, nucleare, energia, migrazione, cooperazione culturale e accademica. Avviata anche una commissione economica mista e l'apertura di una sede dell'Università della Tuscia a Tashkent. Coinvolte aziende italiane come Danieli e Ansaldo Energia, insieme a Sace per i meccanismi di garanzia. Ne parliamo con Vincenzo Miglietta inviato per RadiocorDior, Maria Grazia Chiuri lascia la direzione creativaDopo nove anni, Maria Grazia Chiuri lascia la direzione creativa delle collezioni femminili di Dior. Prima donna in questo ruolo, ha segnato l'identità della maison con una visione femminista e coerente con l'eredità di monsieur Dior. Il suo ultimo atto è stata la sfilata Cruise 2025 a Roma. Possibile successione affidata a Jonathan Anderson, oggi già a capo di Dior Homme. Chiuri è data in avvicinamento a Fendi. L'uscita avviene in un momento di riassetto strategico per LVMH e di incertezza per il mercato globale del lusso. Ne parliamo con Giulia Crivelli, Il Sole 24 Ore

In this candid and thought-provoking episode, Alex interviews me about a topic I've been passionate about discussing behind the scenes for years. After five years of studying and teaching human design, I'm sharing my unfiltered thoughts about how this powerful system can be both empowering and potentially limiting, depending on how it's used.This conversation dives deep into my evolution with human design - from the initial profound moment of feeling seen and understood, to witnessing both the magic and the shadows within the community, to discovering tropical vs. sidereal astrology and how it's transformed my understanding of these systems entirely.What You'll Learn in This Episode:

Alberto Iturralde, responsable de Operativa Dax, analiza los títulos de Endesa, EDP, Danieli, Technogym, Ferrovial, Poste italiane o Enel.

Alberto Iturralde analiza los títulos de Endesa, EDP, Danieli, Technogym, Ferrovial, Poste italiane, Enel, ACS o IBM, entre otros

O programa Assunto Nosso dessa edição contou com a presença de Jeferson Cappellari, a Diretora IMI, Danieli Eichwald, e com a Coordenadora de Projetos Grupo Foco, Carina Bublitz. Juntos trouxeram a tona informações sobre o projeto Comunicação não Violenta.

O programa Assunto Nosso dessa edição contou com a presença de Jeferson Cappellari, a Diretora IMI, Danieli Eichwald, e com a Coordenadora de Projetos Grupo Foco, Carina Bublitz. Juntos trouxeram a tona informações sobre o projeto Comunicação não Violenta.

Adam Danieli är jurist och arbetar som ansvarig för rättsfrågor på tankesmedjan Timbro. Adam har tidigare gästat Skattebetalarnas podcast Uppskattat för att berätta om sina två rapporter Enpartistaten och Kommandohöjderna. Nu gästar Adam åter Uppskattat för ett uppföljande samtal om vad som har skett på områdena som rapporterna behandlar och för att diskutera biståndspolitiken.

Estudante de Vera Cruz alcança maior nota do estado na redação do Enem.

Estudante de Vera Cruz alcança maior nota do estado na redação do Enem.

We speak to three businesswomen working in traditionally male-dominated sectors.Anna Mareschi Danieli from the Italian-based global steel company Danieli group. Caroll Masevhe, founder of a women-only construction business - Kapcor construction, in Johannesburg; and Patty Eid from Petrofac, a leader in the Middle East's oil and gas industry. Producer/presenter: Sam Fenwick(Image: L-R, Caroll Masevhe Patty Eid, Anna Mareschi Danieli)

Antonio Danieli, Vice Presidente e Direttore Generale Fondazione Golinelli"Dall'origine al destino"Dall'8 febbraio al 30 giugno 2025Bologna, Centro Arti e Scienze Golinelliwww.dalloriginealdestino.itIl nuovo progetto espositivo di Fondazione Golinelli a cura di Andrea Zanotti, Antonio Danieli, Luca Ciancabilla e Simone Gheduzzi.Tra arte, scienza e tecnologia, la mostra esplora la trama del progresso della cultura umana, nella sua dimensione sia universale che soggettiva. Un viaggio affascinante attraverso i momenti più significativi dell'evoluzione culturale e tecnologica, dalla comparsa dell'uomo sulla Terra all'avvento dell'Intelligenza Artificiale, ponendo l'accento sulle nostre capacità di orientamento rispetto alla velocità dello sviluppo della tecnica.Una riflessione profonda sul passato, sul futuro e sul nostro rapporto con il tempo e la tecnologia, con l'invito a mettere in pratica un esercizio di umanità per riconciliare la dimensione personale e quella collettiva che il concetto di destino tiene insieme.Il percorso espositivo è suddiviso in due grandi capitoli, che si dipanano in cinque tappe.L'esposizione ripercorre l'evoluzione culturale dell'umanità, dalla comparsa dell'uomo sulla Terra all'avvento dell'Intelligenza Artificiale attraverso opere di Anselm Kiefer, Nicola Samorì, Umberto Boccioni, Fortunato De Pero, Mario Sironi, Giacomo Balla; oggetti di design di Pablo Picasso ed Ettore Sottsass, grafiche di Bruno Munari.Sono esposti, inoltre, la nuova Ducati Panigale V4 S con la sua sofisticata base meccanica e il fondo di una supercar ad alte prestazioni, la Dallara Stradale.Il progetto esplora la trama del progresso della cultura umana, indagandone sia la dimensione universale che soggettiva: "invita i visitatori a riflettere sul nostro rapporto con il tempo e la tecnologia, - ha spiegato Zanotti - e a mettere in pratica un esercizio di umanità volto a riconciliare la dimensione personale e universale che i concetti di origine e destino tengono insieme".    Il percorso espositivo (oltre 150 opere, oggetti e reperti provenienti da 50 musei, istituzioni culturali e collezioni private) è suddiviso in due grandi capitoli. Il primo si concentra sui passaggi evolutivi della civiltà, un vero e proprio viaggio nel tempo grazie alla presenza di reperti, manufatti, strumenti tecnico-scientifici, installazioni, opere d'arte e di design di svariati materiali e tecniche artistiche.Nel secondo capitolo si è chiamati a riflettere sulla propria condizione esistenziale e invitati a un esercizio più intimo: riscoprire, in un'epoca dominata da un divenire frenetico e incessante, la consapevolezza di un futuro il cui senso appare sempre più sfuggente.Il percorso si conclude con un exhibit immersivo di grande impatto emozionale: il T-Simmetry, il tunnel a "cronologia inversa" che condurrà il pubblico in un viaggio interattivo a ritroso nel tempo, ripercorrendo simbolicamente le tappe fondamentali della propria esistenza, come se il "nastro" della vita di ognuno venisse riavvolto. In concomitanza dell'apertura della mostra Dall'origine al destino, è stata svelata Before and after, l'opera site specific dell'artista argentino Jorge Macchi, che entra a far parte, in modo permanente, del patrimonio artistico del Centro Arti e Scienze Golinelli, costituita da una trama di cavi d'acciaio e mattoni di argilla.   Orari: da martedì a venerdì 15-20; sabato e domenica 10-20 (compresi 25 aprile, 1 maggio e 2 giugno)IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

O uso das telas é assunto que sempre rende. Neste episódio, em especial, convidamos a diretora do Instituto Sinodal Imigrante, Danieli Eichwald e a psicóloga Patrícia Mór para conversarmos sobre a nova lei que proíbe o uso de celulares nas escolas. Reflexão válida!

O uso das telas é assunto que sempre rende. Neste episódio, em especial, convidamos a diretora do Instituto Sinodal Imigrante, Danieli Eichwald e a psicóloga Patrícia Mór para conversarmos sobre a nova lei que proíbe o uso de celulares nas escolas. Reflexão válida!

Lithium, charbon... La guerre menée par la Russie en Ukraine menace aussi l'avenir minier du pays. La dernière mine affectée est celle de Pokrovsk, qui constitue la principale source de charbon à coke du pays. Sa production est essentielle à l'industrie sidérurgique locale.  La détérioration des conditions de sécurité et des pénuries d'électricité en Ukraine sont les raisons invoquées par le sidérurgiste Metinvest pour justifier la suspension des activités du site de Pokrovsk dans le Donbass. Un plan d'urgence a été activé pour que les usines métallurgiques du pays – Kamet Steel et la joint-venture Zaporizhstal – ne manquent pas de charbon à coke. Il prévoit une augmentation des importations des États-Unis via une des filiales du groupe – United Coal Compagny –, « l'utilisation de stocks de charbon récemment accumulés » et des achats auprès d'autres fournisseurs. L'arrêt des activités minières à Pokrovsk sur le long terme serait un coup dur pour l'Ukraine. On parle du « cœur énergétique » du pays, rappelle le propriétaire du site. L'année dernière, le syndicat des sidérurgistes avait estimé qu'une fermeture de la mine de Pokrovsk pourrait faire chuter la production d'acier à 2 ou 3 millions de tonnes, contre un peu plus de 7 millions l'année dernière. Sachant que la destruction des principales usines du pays depuis le début de la guerre menée par la Russie a déjà fait baisser les volumes de 70%.À lire aussiUkraine: Toretsk, une ville minière réduite au froid et plongée dans le noirLes vœux de Metinvest contrariésDébut janvier, le PDG de Metinvest était encore plein d'espoir et formulait le vœu qu'en 2025, la guerre se termine et que l'économie dévastée puisse se redresser. Le groupe assurait alors se préparer à la reconstruction et la modernisation du secteur de la sidérurgie, et annonçait en parallèle des investissements dans l'acier vert en Italie pour construire une usine pilote, en partenariat avec l'industriel Danieli.Cette nouvelle pression sur la production ukrainienne de charbon n'est pas la seule préoccupation du secteur minier. Elle s'ajoute aux craintes de mainmise russe sur le lithium : le Donbass renferme des réserves pour l'instant inexploitées mais qui pourraient demain se révéler précieuses, quand les besoins pour la fabrication des voitures électriques décolleront.À lire aussiDes exportations de charbon venant de territoires ukrainiens occupés suscitent le débat

PUCCINI: Gianni Schicchi, Ópera en un acto (51.02). R. Tebaldi (sop.), L. Danieli (mez.), A. lazzari (ten.), R. Ercolani (ten.), D. Carral (sop.), Coro y Orq. del Maggio Musicale Fiorentino. Dir.: L. Gardelli.Escuchar audio

PUCCINI: Suor Angelica (51.23). R. Tebaldi (sop.), G. Simionato (mez.), L. Danieli (mez), M. Truccato Pace (con.), A. di Stasio (mez.), Coro y Orq. del Maggio Musicale Fiorentino. Dir.: L. Gardelli.Escuchar audio

Daniele Rustioni is a major presence at leading opera houses and symphony halls. In 2022, the International Opera Awards named him “Best Conductor.” His opera repertoire numbers over 70 works spanning over centuries and ranging from Italian to French, German to Russian, and more. This coming season he concludes his eight-year tenure as music director of Opéra National de Lyon.   He was principal guest conductor of the Bavarian State Opera until October 2023.Daniele has led performances at the nearly all of the most important international opera houses and festivals, including Aix-en-Provence Festival, BBC Proms, Berlin State Opera, Dutch National Opera, Paris Opera, Royal Opera House Covent Garden, Salzburg Festival, Teatro Real, Zurich Opera House and the Teatro alla Scala. In Italy, his homeland, he has also conducted at Opera di Roma, Teatro del Maggio Musicale Fiorentino (Florence), Teatro La Fenice (Venice), Rossini Opera Festival (Pesaro) and Teatro San Carlo (Naples).He was recently named principal guest conductor at the Metropolitan Opera, and as we spoke, he was preparing his debut concerts with the New York Philharmonic.  

Join David Clark on Inside the Rope as he speaks with Frank Danieli, Head of Credit Investment and Lending at MA Financial Group. In this episode, they delve into the Australian private credit and debt market, addressing concerns about potential bubbles and exploring the unique investment opportunities in low-risk, low-volatility portfolios. Frank also sheds light on the MA Priority Income Fund, offering insight into asset-backed lending and specialised finance areas, which promise robust returns. Tune in for a comprehensive look at modern private credit strategies and how they fit into today's investment landscape.

“Tutta La Juve che Vuoi” con Dario Ghiringhelli e Luana Danieli. Ospiti: Jacopo Gerna, Stefano Romagnoli (Footstats).

Meu Podcast “Receios Obscuros” Apoia.se com conteúdo exclusivo Envio de relatos por texto: receiosdoalem@gmail.com O primeiro relato foi enviado pela Danieli que nos conta uma situação que a sua mãe passou quando encontrou um cachorro gigante que tinha olhos brilhantes e assustadores. No segundo relato a Grazyella conta um relato de OVNI, também com sua mãe, em que ela avistou uma nave voando baixo e depois teve um problema muito estranho nas suas mãos. O Próximo relato foi da Mariana e uma situação muito bizarra com seu ex-namorado em que uma entidade, que lembrava um leão branco, visitou sua casa e da sua prima. Por fim, no relato da Talita, sua vó a visita em um sonho e ela pôde ter um último contato com ela e ouvir dela que ela sempre estaria ali para ela e para sua mãe.

Für das heutige Thema habe ich mir wieder eine wundervollen Gästin eingeladen: Alexandra Danieli. Alex ist Human Design Projektorin, wohnt in Kalifornien, hat 3 Kinder, ein erfolgreiches Coaching Business und hilft Projektoren Wohlstand zu kreieren. Wir sind tief in die folgenden Themen eingetaucht: Alex Weg zum Human Design Cosmic Human Design vs. Tropical Human Design Alex Vergangenheit mit Geld und was sie vorgelebt bekommen hat Wie es sich finanziell ausgewirkt hat, als Alex herausgefunden hat, dass sie Projektorin ist Womit Projektoren anfangen sollten, wenn sie in finanzieller Fülle leben wollen Wie Projektoren aus dem Gefühl des „Aufdrängens“ und ins Dienen kommen Was war Alex größter innere Shift in Bezug auf Geld? Wie es dazu kam, dass genau dieses Thema heute Alex Lieblingsthema ist Welche Energie hat Geld und was ist Geld? Angenommen: Projektoren, die zuhören, sind gerade in der Verbitterung aufgrund finanzieller Sorgen oder Ängste: Was würde Alex empfehlen? Warum ist es so wichtig, dass Projektoren in ihrem (finanziellen) Erfolg sind? Du findest Alex auf ihrem Instagram Account und auf ihrer Webseite.  Angesprochene Chart Rechner: Cosmic Human Design True Sky Astrology Viel Freude mit dieser Mehrwert bepackten Folge! Meine aktuellen Angebote für dich: ⁠⁠⁠// The Easeful Elevation 1:1 Business Mentoring⁠ Mein neues intensives und transformierendes 1:1 Mentoring für alle Soulpreneure, die mit einer Kombination aus ihren Gene Keys Energien und einer individuellen Business Begleitung endlich ihre YOUnique Energie leben wollen, damit sie das Vorbild sind, das diese Welt wirklich braucht! // ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Gene Keys Mastery: Die Schlüssel zu deiner authentischen Sichtbarkeit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Lade dir hier für 0 Euro mein neues Hörbuch herunter, in dem ich dich in 1,5 Stunden mitnehme in die 3 Schritte: Deine Gene Keys Energien lesen, deine Gene Keys Energien verkörpern und deine Gene Keys Energien in deinem Business sichtbar zu machen, sprich deine Brand Voice aufzubauen. Weitere Angebote, Blogartikel und Informationen über mich und meine Arbeit findest du auf meiner ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Webseite⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ und auf meinem ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram Account⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dein Gene Keys Profil kannst du dir kostenlos hier erstellen: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Englisch⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ oder ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Deutsch⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Love, Marie

Neste novo episódio discutimos as complexidades da gestação e nascimento de Pets, concentrando-se nas diferenças entre cães e gatos, sinais de cio e considerações de reprodução. ####Destaques -

Let's face it. We all know someone who has experienced at least one traumatic event in their lives. We may be the trauma survivor. In fact, 50% of all U.S. adults will experience at least one traumatic event in their lives (NIH). Trauma can be damaging in the moment and in the aftermath. On this episode, I discuss my personal experience with trauma and PTSD. I also discuss the Conspiracy of Silence spearheaded by Dr. Yael Danieli (2009). Let's connect: https://drmatmonharrell.bio.link/ Music "Take me Back" provided by PodcastleEpisode written by Dr. Matmon HarrellReferencesCatherall, D. R. (2004). Handbook of stress, trauma, and the family. Brunner-Routledge.Coalition for National Trauma Research. 2022. Toll of trauma. https://www.nattrauma.org/why-we-advocate/ Danieli, Y. (2009). Massive trauma and the healing role of reparative justice. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(5), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20441 FHEHealth. 2024. Trauma statistics. https://fherehab.com/trauma/statisticsNew England Board of Higher Education. 2024. Reparative Justice. https://nebhe.org/reparative-justice/  Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/themindfulpharmd. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ci sono arrivata per caso, io amo fare colazione alla grande e ovunque vada mi metto alla ricerca come un segugio del bar migliora. Di solito dalla folla si comprende subito la qualità. E qui da Dolc'è si riunisce tutto il quartiere. Siamo al Prenestino Labicano, ma per me è più Pigneto alta o Malatesta, perché sono di San Giovanni e li considero vicini di casa. Qui da due anni Cristian e Lyudmyla hanno aperto una piccola pasticceria di tutto rispetto. Lyudmila è autodidatta o meglio come dice lei, ha imparato rubando con gli occhi i segreti dei pasticceri di una volta. Tutte persone di una certa età e molto sagge. Ha lavorato in diversi bar pasticceria con una lunga esperienza al Danieli di viale Regina Margherita e oggi nella sua pasticceria sforna una serie di prelibatezze.

"La Signora Danieli era maestra di Trento e aveva 70 anni. Malgrado la guerra, ha continuato a consacrarsi con amore ai bambini di quella città. Aveva partecipato a manifestazioni italiane a Trento e per ciò era mal vista dalla polizia."Contatti: andataeritorno.podcast@gmail.com Sito e newsletter: https://andataeritornopodcast.substack.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/andataeritornostoriedimontagna/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61557903953187&name=xhp_nt__fb__action__open_userThreads: https://www.threads.net/@andataeritornostoriedimontagnaMusic by Epidemic Sound

Antonio DanieliOltre lo spazio, oltre il tempo.Il sogno di Ulisse Aldrovandi.Fondazione GolinelliMuseo Civico di Zoologia, RomaFino a domenica 21 luglio 2024, al Museo Civico di Zoologia di Roma, apre al pubblico Oltre lo spazio, oltre il tempo. Il sogno di Ulisse Aldrovandi. Dopo l'esposizione bolognese, arriva nella Capitale la mostra prodotta da Fondazione Golinelli e SMA - Sistema Museale di Ateneo, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna e realizzata in collaborazione con INAF - Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica.Il progetto espositivo, nato da un'idea di Andrea Zanotti, Antonio Danieli, Roberto Balzani e Luca Ciancabilla, che ne firmano anche la curatela, è promosso da Roma Capitale, Assessorato alla Cultura - Sovrintendenza Capitolina ai Beni Culturali, con il supporto organizzativo di Zètema Progetto Cultura.La mostra presenta un connubio originale e armonico tra reperti e oggetti delle collezioni museali dell'Ateneo bolognese e di quelle dei Musei Civici della Sovrintendenza Capitolina, exhibit tecnico-scientifici immersivi e interattivi prodotti in originale da Fondazione Golinelli, quadri di diverse epoche di Bartolomeo Passarotti, Enrico Prampolini, Virginio Marchi e Mattia Moreni, opere d'arte -  dipinti, sculture e installazioni - di Nicola Samorì. In mostra anche oggetti, strumenti, video e immagini provenienti dall'Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica e dall'Agenzia Spaziale Europea. Il tutto intessuto da trame poetiche inedite, da sguardi visionari di scienziati esperti di intelligenza artificiale e neuroscienze e di umanisti.La visione unitaria della cultura e l'endiadi arte e scienza sono proposte in un percorso di ricerca tra passato, presente e scenari futuribili, a partire dalla figura di Ulisse Aldrovandi, uno dei più grandi scienziati e osservatori della natura del Cinquecento. Intraprenderemo un viaggio di conoscenza tra dimensioni cronologiche, distanti ma complementari, e una riflessione sul destino dell'umanità.La mostra gravita intorno alla figura di Ulisse Aldrovandi (1522-1605), uno dei più grandi scienziati della natura del suo tempo. Grazie alla sua straordinaria capacità di osservare, catalogare e conservare i reperti che la natura, nel corso del suo farsi, ha lasciato dietro di sé, Aldrovandi è di fatto il fautore del moderno museo di Storia Naturale, un luogo di memoria e conoscenza, in cui si sedimenta il fondo ancestrale delle nostre origini.L'opera del naturalista bolognese, tuttavia, non è proiettata solo verso il passato: la sua capacità fantastica, perfettamente incarnata da quello che può essere considerato il suo scritto più sorprendente, la Monstrorum Historia – un trattato universale sui mostri e altri prodigi sovrannaturali – colloca l'opera dell'Aldrovandi oltre il tempo e sulla soglia di un mondo altro. Il potere dell'immaginazione apre le porte al futuro, a mondi mai, o non ancora, esistiti. Ulisse Aldrovandi incarna, dunque, due anime: quella di scienziato, osservatore di una realtà che è già stata, e quella dell'artista, che immagina e dà forma a ciò che sarà, spingendosi, come farà secoli dopo la fantascienza, a svelare scenari destinati, col progredire della scienza, a trasformarsi in realtà.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Foi preso em São Paulo um suspeito de atacar duas mulheres durante uma briga em um baile funk, em Itapecerica da Serra, região metropolitana. Uma das vítimas morreu após ser baleada perto do local da confusão. As imagens de câmeras de segurança ajudaram a polícia a localizar e prender um suspeito de envolvimento no crime. Em um dos vídeos, é possível ver a confusão. As duas mulheres trocaram socos e empurrões com alguns homens, entre eles Breno Fernandes. Ele entrou em um carro vermelho e fugiu. Pouco tempo depois, o mesmo veículo surgiu ao lado das mulheres em uma rua próxima. O passageiro sacou uma arma e atirou. Danieli de Miranda Alves não resistiu aos ferimentos. A amiga dela não foi atingida.

Radio Public APGCITV-USA FM Danieli(Daniel) 9 Maombi Ya Danieli 1 ⓩ Katika mwaka wa kwanza wa kutawala kwake Dario mwana wa Ahusuero (mzaliwa wa Umedi) ambaye alifanywa mtawala juu ya ufalme wa Babeli, 1 In the first year of Darius the son of Ahasuerus, of the seed of the Medes, which was made king over the realm of the Chaldeans; 2 ⓐ katika mwaka wa kwanza wa kutawala kwake, mimi Danieli, nilielewa kutokana na Maandiko, kulingana na neno la BWANA alilopewa nabii Yeremia, kwamba ukiwa wa Yerusalemu ungetimizwa kwa miaka sabini. 2 In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. 3 ⓑ Kwa hiyo nikamgeukia BWANA Mungu na kumsihi katika maombi na dua, katika kufunga, kuvaa nguo ya gunia na kujipaka majivu. 3 And I set my face unto the Lord God, to seek by prayer and supplications, with fasting, and sackcloth, and ashes: 4 ⓒ Nikamwomba BWANA Mungu wangu na kutubu: “Ee Bwana, Mungu mkuu na unayetisha, anayeshika Agano lake la upendo kwao wanaompenda na kutii maagizo yake, 4 And I prayed unto the LORD my God, and made my confession, and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments; 5 ⓓ tumetenda dhambi na kufanya mabaya. Tumekuwa waovu na tumeasi, tumegeuka mbali na maagizo yako na sheria zako. 5 We have sinned, and have committed iniquity, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled, even by departing from thy precepts and from thy judgments: 6 ⓔ Hatukuwasikiliza watumishi wako manabii, ambao kwa jina lako walisema na wafalme wetu, wakuu wetu, baba zetu na watu wote wa nchi. 6 Neither have we hearkened unto thy servants the prophets, which spake in thy name to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, and to all the people of the land. 7 ⓕ “Bwana, wewe ni mwenye haki, lakini siku hii ya leo tumefunikwa na aibu, wanaume wa Yuda na watu wa Yerusalemu nayo Israeli yote, wote walio karibu na walio mbali, katika nchi zote ulikotutawanya kwa sababu ya sisi kukosa uaminifu kwako. 7 O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee. 8 ⓖ Ee BWANA, sisi na wafalme wetu, wakuu wetu na baba zetu tumefunikwa na aibu kwa sababu tumefanya dhambi dhidi yako. 8 O Lord, to us belongeth confusion of face, to our kings, to our princes, and to our fathers, because we have sinned against thee. 9 ⓗ BWANA Mungu wetu ni mwenye rehema na anayesamehe, hata ingawa tumefanya uasi dhidi yake, 9 To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgivenesses, though we have rebelled against him; 10 ⓘ hatukumtii BWANA Mungu wetu wala kuzishika sheria alizotupa kupitia kwa watumishi wake manabii. 10 Neither have we obeyed the voice of the LORD our God, to walk in his laws, which he set before us by his servants the prophets. 11 ⓙ Israeli yote imekosea sheria yako na kugeuka mbali, nao wamekataa kukutii. “Kwa hiyo laana na viapo vya hukumu vilivyoandikwa katika Sheria ya Mose, mtumishi wa Mungu, vimemiminwa juu yetu, kwa sababu tumefanya dhambi dhidi yako. 11 Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him. 12 ⓚ Umetimiza maneno uliyosema dhidi yetu na dhidi ya watawala wetu kwa kuleta maafa makubwa juu yetu. Chini ya mbingu yote kamwe hapajatendeka kitu kama kile kilichotendeka katika Yerusalemu. 12 And he hath confirmed his words, which he spake against us, and against our judges that judged us, by bringing upon us a great evil: for under --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/apostolicpowerofgod/support

Precipio is a healthcare biotechnology companyfocused on cancer diagnostics. Our mission is to address the pervasive problemof cancer misdiagnoses by developing solutions in the form of diagnosticproducts and services. Our products and services deliver higher accuracy,improved laboratory workflow, and ultimately better patient outcomes, whichreduce healthcare expenses. Precipio develops innovative technologies in ourlaboratory where we design, test, validate, and use these products clinically,improving diagnostic outcomes. Precipio then commercializes these technologiesas proprietary products that serve the global laboratory community and furtherscales Precipio's reach to eradicate misdiagnosis.

In this episode we hear from Giacomo Mareschi Danieli, the CEO of Italy-based Danieli group, a key equipment supplier to the global steel industry as well as a steel producer. Giacomo explains what steel decarbonisation means from a technological perspective in this fascinating discussion on what will drive the green revolution.He describes how new technologies are shifting steel production to completely new regions of the world such as Southern California and Australia. He also discusses the challenges that lie ahead for the industry at large and how they will be addressed. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Lunedì atteso il via libera Ue alla missione nel Mar Rosso. Con Alessandro Marrone, esperto di relazioni internazionali e responsabile del programma “Difesa” dell’Istituto Affari Internazionali, facciamo il punto sulle altre missioni nelle quali è impegnata l'Italia. Se a Taranto la situazione dell’ex Ilva rimane difficile, a Piombino viene siglata un’intesa tra Danieli e l’ucraina Metinvest. Ci spiega tutto Silvia Pieraccini, che ne scrive sul Sole 24 Ore di oggi. Alluvione in Emilia-Romagna: per i sindaci le risorse sono ancora insufficienti. Ci colleghiamo con Michele De Pascale, sindaco di Ravenna e presidente dell’Unione Province Italiane.Oggi al via la Supercoppa Italiana. Sentiamo il nostro Carlo Genta.

Kuidas USA poiss Annelinna jõudis, enda looga rekordeid purustas ja lõi unistuste suhte oma lapsepõlve armastusega.  ​Daniel Levi Viinalass on hinnatud muusik nii siin- kui sealpool merd ning tema lugu koos Cartooniga On&On heliseb tänapäevani miljardite kuulajate peas. Daniel on osalenud mitmel korral Eesti Laulul, kus 2015. aastal saavutas ka 2. koha. Tema omanimeline bänd on esinenud korduvalt erinevatel festivalidel Eestis ja välismaal. Lisaks enda loomingu esitamisele on kirjutanud ta ka muusikat teistele artistidele, sealhulgas Sander Mölder, Liis Lemsalu ja Jüri Pootsmann.  SAATES RÄÄGIME: Koolikiusajaks olemise valusatest õppetundidest Suhtest Jumala ja usuga Eluarmastuse petmisest  Aususest kui edukuse võtmest Oleviku haprast olemusest Loost, mis jõudis miljardite kuulamisteni Suhte värskena hoidmise saladusest SHOWNOTES 00:00 - Sissejuhatus - Kes on Daniel Levi? 00:06:24 - Mis värk nende pikkade juustega on? 00:14:32 - 90ndatel USAst Eestisse kolimine, lapsepõlvest Ohios 00:20:32 - Kodu keset Annelinna, vanemate misjonäride tööst 00:22:30 - Käänulisest integreerumisest Tartu kooli 00:26:20 - Eesti keele nullist selgeks õppimisest 00:30:50 - Haavatav vestlus koolikiusamisest - Danieli ja Martini lugu 00:43:30 - Kuidas kasvatada laps sallivaks? 00:46:13 - Uskumuste surve vastuhakk, teekond Jumalani 00:52:36 - Mida Jumal Danieli jaoks täna tähendab? 01:02:50 - Erinevate perspektiivide mõistmisest 01:09:00 - Kirest muusika vastu, esimene kodukootud album 01:17:28 - Superstaari unistuse purunemine, uued sihid 01:19:20 - Kuidas sünnib üks hea lugu? 01:22:39 - Lugu, mis jõudis miljardite kuulamisteni 01:34:29 - Mida tähendab Danieli jaoks edukus? 01:36:26 - Põhikoolis eluarmastuse leidmine  01:41:25 - Truuduse rikkumisest, valetamisest suhtes 01:50:55 - Kuidas hoida suhet värskena? 01:57:25 - Oleviku habras olemus - isaks olemise õppetunnid 02:01:37 - Ausus kui edukuse alus 02:03:29 - Mis on Danieli praegused väljakutsed? DANIEL LEVI VIINALASS Koduleht: https://daniellevi.eu/  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danielleviviinalass  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/daniellevimusic  TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@danielleviviinalass  Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/0cA0C4yBNRaN2EZsE2wT3Y?si=OkFrKLcmS_6QnPKxX0ng0A&nd=1  TÄITSA PEKKIS SAADE Koduleht: ⁠https://taitsapekkis.ee  Instagram: ⁠https://www.instagram.com/taitsapekkissaade/  Facebook: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/taitsapekkissaade⁠ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@taitsapekkissaade  Toeta meid Patreonis: ⁠https://www.patreon.com/taitsapekkis/ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/taitsapekkissaade/message

Listen on: * Spotify* Apple Podcasts* Google PodcastsNote: the core discussion on ethics begins at 7:58 and moves into philosophy of language at ~1:12:19Daniel's stuff:* AI X-risk podcast * The Filan Cabined podcast* Personal website and blogBlurb and bulleted summary from ClongThis wide-ranging conversation between Daniel and Aaron touches on movies, business drama, philosophy of language, ethics and legal theory. The two debate major ethical concepts like utilitarianism and moral realism. Thought experiments around rational beings choosing to undergo suffering feature prominently. meandering tangents explore the semantics of names and references.* Aaron asserts that total utilitarianism does not imply that any amount of suffering can be morally justified by creating more happiness. His argument is that the affirmative case for this offsetting ability has not been clearly made.* He proposes a thought experiment - if offered to experience the suffering of all factory farmed animals in exchange for unlimited happiness, even a perfectly rational being would refuse. This indicates there are some levels of suffering not offsettable.* Aaron links this to experiences like hunger where you realize suffering can be worse than you appreciate normally. This causes his intuition some suffering can't be outweighed.* Daniel disagrees, believing with the right probabilities and magnitudes of suffering versus happiness, rational beings would take that gamble.* For example, Daniel thinks the atomic bombing of Japan could be offset by reducing more suffering. Aaron is less sure given the pain inflicted.* Daniel also proposes offsets for animal farming, but Aaron doesn't think factory farming harm is offsettable by any amount of enjoyment of meat.* They discuss definitions of rationality and whether evolution pressures against suicide impact the rationality of not killing oneself.* Aaron ties his argument to siding with what a perfectly rational being would choose to experience, not necessarily what they would prefer.* They debate whether hypothetical aliens pursuing "schmorality" could point to a concept truly analogous to human morality. Aaron believes not.Transcript(Very imperfect)AARONO'how's, it going it's going all right.DANIELYeah, I just so yesterday I saw Barbie and today I saw Oppenheimer, so it's good to oh, cool. That cultural.AARONNice, nice.DANIELDo you have takes? Yeah, I thought it was all right. It was a decent view of Oppenheimer as a person. It was like a how? I don't know. I feel like the public can tend to be taken in by this physicist figures you get this with quotes, right? Like, the guy was just very good at having fun with journalists, and now we get these amazing nuggets of wisdom from Einstein. I don't know. I think that guy was just having good I don't know. The thing that I'm coming away from is I thought I only watched Barbie because it was coming out on the same day as Oppenheimer, right? Like, otherwise it wouldn't have occurred to me to watch it. I was like, yeah, whatever. Barbie is, like, along for the ride, and Oppenheimer is going to be amazing, but in like, maybe Oppenheimer was a bit better than Barbie, but I'm not even sure of that, actually.AARONYeah, I've been seeing people say that on Twitter. I haven't seen either, but I've been seeing several people say that I'm following, say, like, Barbie was exceptional. And also that kind of makes sense because I'm following all these EA people who are probably care more about the subject matter for the latter one. So it's like, I kind of believe that Barbie is, like, aesthetically better or something. That's my take. Right.DANIELGuess. Well, if you haven't seen them, I guess I don't want to spoil them for you. They're trying to do different things aesthetically. Right. Like, I'm not quite sure I'd want to say one is aesthetically better. Probably in some ways, I think Barbie probably has more aesthetic blunders than Oppenheimer does. Okay. But yeah, I don't know if you haven't seen it, I feel like I don't want to spoil it for you.AARONOkay. No, that's fine. This isn't supposed to be like probably isn't the most important the most interesting thing we could be talking about is that the bar?DANIELOh, jeez.AARONOh, no, that's a terrible bar. That was like an overstatement. That would be a very high bar. It would also be, like, kind of paralyzing. I don't know. Actually know what that would be, honestly. Probably some social juicy gossip thing. Not that we necessarily have any.DANIELYeah, I think your interestingness. Yeah, I think I don't have the know, the closest to gossip thing I saw was like, do you see this bit of Carolyn Elson's diaries and letters to SBF that was leaked to the.AARONNo, I don't. Was this like today or recently? How recently?DANIELThis was like a few days ago.AARONI've been seeing her face on Twitter, but I don't actually think I know anything about this. And no, I would not have.DANIELBackground of who she is and stuff.AARONYeah, hold on. Let the audience know that I am on a beach family vacation against my will. Just kidding. Not against my will. And I have to text my sister back. Okay, there we go. I mean, I broadly know the FTX story. I know that she was wait, I'm like literally blanking on the Alameda.DANIELThat's the name of research.AARONOkay. Yeah. So she was CEO, right? Yeah. Or like some sort of like I think I know the basics.DANIELThe like, she was one of the OG Stanford EA people and was around.AARONYeah, that's like a generation. Not an actual generation, like an EA generation. Which is what, like six years or.DANIELLike the I don't know, I've noticed like, in the there's like I feel like there's this gap between pre COVID people and post COVID people. No one left their house. Partly people moved away, but also you were inside for a while and never saw anyone in person. So it felt like, oh, there's like this crop of new people or something. Whereas in previous years, there'd be some number of new people per year and they'd get gradually integrated in. Anyway, all that is to say that, I don't know, I think SBF's side of the legal battle leaked some documents to The New York Times, which were honestly just like her saying, like, oh, I feel very stressed and I don't like my job, and I'm sort of glad that the thing is blown up now. I don't know. It honestly wasn't that salacious. But I think that's, like, the way I get in the loop on gossip like some of the New York Times.AARONAnd I eventually I love how it's funny that this particular piece of gossip is, like, running through the most famous and prestigious news organization in the world. Or, like, one of them or something. Yeah. Instead of just being like, oh, yeah, these two people are dating, or whatever. Anyway, okay, I will maybe check that out.DANIELYeah, I mean, honestly, it's not even that interesting.AARONThe whole thing is pretty I am pretty. This is maybe bad, but I can't wait to watch the Michael Lewis documentary, pseudo documentary or whatever.DANIELYeah, it'll be good to read the book. Yeah, it's very surreal. I don't know. I was watching Oppenheimer. Right. And I have to admit, part of what I'm thinking is be if humanity survives, there's going to be this style movie about open AI, presumably, right? And I'm like, oh, man, it'll be amazing to see my friend group depicted on film. But that is going to happen. It's just going to be about FTX and about how they're all criminals. So that's not great.AARONYeah, actually, everybody dunks on crypto now, and it's like low status now or whatever. I still think it's really cool. I never had more than maybe $2,000 or whatever, which is not a trivial I mean, it's not a large amount of my money either, but it's not like, nothing. But I don't know, if it wasn't for all the cultural baggage, I feel like I would be a crypto bro or I would be predisposed to being a crypto bro or something.DANIELYeah. I should say I was like joking about the greedy crypto people who want their money to not be stolen. I currently have a Monero sticker on the back of my a big I don't know, I'm a fan of the crypto space. It seems cool. Yeah. I guess especially the bit that is less about running weird scams. The bit that's running weird scams I'm less of a fan of.AARONYeah. Yes. I'm also anti scam. Right, thank you. Okay, so I think that thing that we were talking about last time we talked, which is like the thing I think we actually both know stuff about instead of just like, repeating New York Times articles is my nuanced ethics takes and why you think about talk about that and then we can just also branch off from there.DANIELYeah, we can talk about that.AARONMaybe see where that did. I luckily I have a split screen up, so I can pull up things. Maybe this is kind of like egotistical or something to center my particular view, but you've definitely given me some of the better pushback or whatever that I haven't gotten that much feedback of any kind, I guess, but it's still interesting to hear your take. So basically my ethical position or the thing that I think is true is that which I think is not the default view. I think most people think this is wrong is that total utilitarianism does not imply that for some amount of suffering that could be created there exists some other extremely large arbitrarily, large amount of happiness that could also be created which would morally justify the former. Basically.DANIELSo you think that even under total utilitarianism there can be big amounts of suffering such that there's no way to morally tip the calculus. However much pleasure you can create, it's just not going to outweigh the fact that you inflicted that much suffering on some people.AARONYeah, and I'd highlight the word inflicted if something's already there and you can't do anything about it, that's kind of neither here nor there as it pertains to your actions or something. So it's really about you increasing, you creating suffering that wouldn't have otherwise been created. Yeah. It's also been a couple of months since I've thought about this in extreme detail, although I thought about it quite a bit. Yeah.DANIELMaybe I should say my contrary view, I guess, when you say that, I don't know, does total utilitarianism imply something or not? I'm like, well, presumably it depends on what we mean by total utilitarianism. Right. So setting that aside, I think that thesis is probably false. I think that yeah. You can offset great amounts of suffering with great amounts of pleasure, even for arbitrary amounts of suffering.AARONOkay. I do think that position is like the much more common and even, I'd say default view. Do you agree with that? It's sort of like the implicit position of people who are of self described total utilitarians who haven't thought a ton about this particular question.DANIELYeah, I think it's probably the implicit default. I think it's the implicit default in ethical theory or something. I think that in practice, when you're being a utilitarian, I don't know, normally, if you're trying to be a utilitarian and you see yourself inflicting a large amount of suffering, I don't know. I do think there's some instinct to be like, is there any way we can get around this?AARONYeah, for sure. And to be clear, I don't think this would look like a thought experiment. I think what it looks like in practice and also I will throw in caveats as I see necessary, but I think what it looks like in practice is like, spreading either wild animals or humans or even sentient digital life through the universe. That's in a non as risky way, but that's still just maybe like, say, making the earth, making multiple copies of humanity or something like that. That would be an example that's probably not like an example of what an example of creating suffering would be. For example, just creating another duplicate of earth. Okay.DANIELAnything that would be like so much suffering that we shouldn't even the pleasures of earth outweighs.AARONNot necessarily, which is kind of a cop out. But my inclination is that if you include wild animals, the answer is yes, that creating another earth especially. Yeah, but I'm much more committed to some amount. It's like some amount than this particular time and place in human industry is like that or whatever.DANIELOkay, can I get a feel of some other concrete cases to see?AARONYeah.DANIELSo one example that's on my mind is, like, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, right? So the standard case for this is, like, yeah, what? A hundred OD thousand people died? Like, quite terrible, quite awful. And a lot of them died, I guess a lot of them were sort of some people were sort of instantly vaporized, but a lot of people died in extremely painful ways. But the countercase is like, well, the alternative to that would have been like, an incredibly grueling land invasion of Japan, where many more people would have died or know regardless of what the actual alternatives were. If you think about the atomic bombings, do you think that's like the kind of infliction of suffering where there's just not an offsetting amount of pleasure that could make that okay?AARONMy intuition is no, that it is offsettable, but I would also emphasize that given the actual historical contingencies, the alternative, the implicit case for the bombing includes reducing suffering elsewhere rather than merely creating happiness. There can definitely be two bad choices that you have to make or something. And my claim doesn't really pertain to that, at least not directly.DANIELRight. Sorry. But when you said you thought your answer was no, you think you can't offset that with pleasure?AARONMy intuition is that you can, but I know very little about how painful those deaths were and how long they lasted.DANIELYeah, so the non offset so it's like, further out than atomic bombing.AARONThat's my guess, but I'm like.DANIELOkay, sure, that's your guess. You're not super confident. That's fine. I guess another thing would be, like, the animal farming system. So, as you're aware, tons of animals get kept in farms for humans to eat, by many count. Many of them live extremely horrible lives. Is there some amount that humans could enjoy meat such that that would be okay?AARONNo. So the only reason I'm hesitating is because, like, the question is, like, what the actual alternative is here, but, like, if it's like, if it's, like, people enjoy, like, a meat a normal amount and there's no basically the answer is no. Although, like, what I would actually endorse doing depends on what the alternative is.DANIELOkay, but you think that factory farming is so bad that it's not offsettable by pleasure.AARONYeah, that's right. I'm somewhat maybe more confident than the atomic bombing case, but again, I don't know what it's like to be a factory farm pig. I wouldn't say I'm, like, 99% sure. Probably more than 70% or something. Or 70%, like, conditional on me being right about this thesis, I guess something like that, which I'm like. Yeah, okay. I don't know. Some percent, maybe, not probably not 99% sure, but also more than 60. Probably more than 70% sure or something.DANIELAll right. Yeah. So I guess maybe can you tell us a little bit about why you would believe that there's some threshold that you like where you can no longer compensate by permitting pleasure?AARONYes. Let me run through my argument and sort of a motivation, and the motivation actually is sort of more a direct answer to what you just said. So the actual argument that I have and I have a blog post about this that I'll link, it was part of an EA forum post also that you'll also link in the show description is that the affirmative default case doesn't seem to actually be made anywhere. That's not the complete argument, but it's a core piece of it, which is that it seems to be, like, the default received view, which doesn't mean it's wrong, but does mean that we should be skeptical. If you accept that I'm right, that the affirmative case hasn't been made, we can talk about that. Then you should default to some other heuristic. And the heuristic that I assert and sort of argue, but kind of just assert is a good heuristic is. Okay. Is you do the following thought experiment. If I was a maximally or perfectly rational being, would I personally choose to undergo this amount of suffering in compensation or not compensation, exchange for later undergoing or earlier undergoing some arbitrarily large amount of happiness. And I personally have the intuition that there are events or things that certainly conceivable states and almost certainly possible states that I could be in such that even as a rational being, like as a maximum rational being, I would choose to just disappear and not exist rather than undergo both of these things.DANIELOkay.AARONYeah.DANIELWhy do you think that?AARONYeah, so good question. I think the answer comes at a couple of different levels. So there's a question of why I'm saying it and why I'm saying it is because I'm pretty sure this is the answer I would actually give if actually given if Credibly offered this option. But that just pushes the question back. Okay, why do I feel that.DANIELEven what option are we talking about here? There exists a thing such that for.AARONAll pleasures, basically, for example, let's just run with the fact, the assumption that a genie God descends. And I think it's credible, and he offers that I can live the life of every factory, farmed animal in exchange for whatever I want for any amount of time or something like that. Literally, I don't have to give the answer now. It can just be like an arbitrarily good state for an arbitrarily long period of time.DANIELOh, yeah.AARONAnd not only would I say the words no, I don't want to do that, I think that the words no, I don't want to do that, are selfishly in a non pejorative sense. Correct. And then there's a question of why do I have that intuition? And now I'm introspecting, which is maybe not super reliable. I think part of my intuition that I can kind of maybe sort of access via introspection just comes from basically, I'm very fortunate to not have had a mostly relatively comfortable life, like as a Westerner with access to painkillers, living in the 21st century. Even still, there have definitely been times when I've been suffered, at least not in a relative sense, but just like, in an absolute sense to me, in a pretty bad way. And one example I can give was just like, I was on a backpacking trip, and this is the example I give in another blog post I can link. I was on a backpacking trip, and we didn't have enough food, and I was basically very hungry for like five days. And I actually think that this is a good and I'm rambling on, but I'll finish up. I think it's illustrative. I think there's some level of suffering where you're still able to do at least for me, I'm still able to do something like reasoning and intentionally storing memories. One of the memories I tried to intentionally codify via language or something was like, yeah, this is really bad, this really sucks, or something like, that what.DANIELSucked about it, you were just like, really hungry yeah.AARONFor five days.DANIELOkay. And you codified the thought, like, feeling of this hunger I'm feeling, this really sucks.AARONSomething like that. Right. I could probably explicate it more, but that's basically okay. Actually, hold on. All right. Let me add so not just it really sucks, but it sucks in a way that I can't normally appreciate, so I don't normally have access to how bad it sucks. I don't want to forget about this later or something.DANIELYeah. The fact that there are pains that are really bad where you don't normally appreciate how bad they are, it's not clear how that implies non offset ability.AARONRight, I agree. It doesn't.DANIELOkay.AARONI do think that's causally responsible for my intuition that I lend link to a heuristic that I then argue does constitute an argument in the absence of other arguments for offset ability.DANIELYeah. Okay. So that causes this intuition, and then you give some arguments, and the argument is like, you think that if a genie offered you to live liable factory farmed animals in exchange for whatever you wanted, you wouldn't go for that.AARONYes. And furthermore, I also wouldn't go for it if I was much more rational.DANIELIf you were rational, yeah. Okay. Yeah. What do I think about this? One thing I think is that the I think the case of live experience this suffering and then experience this pleasure, to me, I think that this is kind of the wrong way to go about this. Because the thing about experiencing suffering is that it's not just we don't live in this totally dualistic world where suffering just affects only your immaterial mind or something in a way where afterwards you could just be the same. In the real world, suffering actually affects you. Right. Perhaps indelibly. I think instead, maybe the thing I'd want to say is suppose you're offered a gamble, right, where there's like a 1% chance that you're going to have to undergo excruciating suffering and a 99% chance that you get extremely awesome pleasures or something.AARONYeah.DANIELAnd this is meant to model a situation in which you do some action in which one person is going to undergo really bad suffering and 99 other people are going to undergo really great pleasure. And to me, I guess my intuition is that for any bad thing, you could make the probability small enough and you can make the rest of the probability mass good enough that I want to do that. I feel like that's worth it for me. And now it feels a little bit unsatisfying that we're just going that we're both drilling down to, like, well, this is the choice I would make, and then maybe you can disagree that it's the choice you would make. But yeah, I guess about the gambling case, what do you think about that? Let's say it's literally a one in a million chance that you would have to undergo, let's say, the life of one factory farmed animal.AARONYeah.DANIELOr is that not enough? Do you want it to be like, more?AARONWell, I guess it would have to be like one of the worst factory farmed animals. Life, I think would make that like.DANIELYeah, okay, let's say it's like, maybe literally one in a billion chance.AARONFirst of all, I do agree that these are basically isomorphic or morally equivalent, or if anything, time ordering in my example does mess things up a little bit, I'll be happy to reverse them or say that instead compare one person to 1000 people. So, yeah, you can make the probability small enough that my intuition changes. Yeah. So in fact, 1%, I'm very like, no, definitely not doing that. One in a million. I'm like, I don't know, kind of 50 50. I don't have a strong intuition either way. 100 trillion. I have the intuition. You know what? That's just not going to happen. That's my first order intuition. I do think that considering the case where you live, one being lives both lives, or you have, say, one being undergoing the suffering and then like 100 trillion undergoing the pleasure makes small probabilities more if you agree that they're sort of isomorphic makes them more complete or something like that, or complete more real in some. Not tangible is not the right word, but more right.DANIELYou're less tempted to round it to zero.AARONYeah. And so I tend to think that I trust my intuitions more about reasoning. Okay, there's one person undergoing suffering and like 100 trillion undergoing happiness as it pertains to the question of offset ability more than I trust my intuitions about small probabilities.DANIELI guess that's strange because that strikes me as strange because I feel like you're regularly in situations where you make choices that have some probability of causing you quite bad suffering, but a large probability of being fun. Like going to the beach. There could be a shark there. I guess this is maybe against your will, but you can go to a restaurant, maybe get food poisoning, but how often are you like, oh man, if I flip this switch, one person will be poisoned, but 99 people will?AARONWell, then you'd have to think that, okay, staying home would actually be safer for some reason, which I don't affirmatively think is true, but this actually does work out for the question of whether you should kill yourself. And there hopefully this doesn't get censored by Apple or whatever, so nobody do that. But there I just think that my lizard brain or there's enough evolutionary pressure to not trust that I would be rational when it comes to the question of whether to avoid a small chance of suffering by unaliving myself, as they say on TikTok.DANIELHang on, evolution is pressured. So there's some evolutionary pressure to make sure you really don't want to kill yourself, but you think that's like, irrational.AARONI haven't actually given this a ton of thought. It gets hard when you loop in altruism and yeah, the question also there's like some chance that of sentient's after death, there's not literally zero or something like that. Yeah, I guess those are kind of cop outs. So I don't know, I feel like it certainly could be. And I agree this is sort of like a strike against my argument or something. I can set up a situation you have no potential to improve the lives of others, and you can be absolutely sure that you're not going to experience any sentience after death. And then I feel like my argument does kind of imply that, yeah, that's like the rational thing to do. I wouldn't do it. Right. So I agree. This is like a strike against me.DANIELYeah. I guess I just want to make two points. So the first point I want to make is just methodologically. If we're talking about which are you likely to be more rational about gambles of small risks, small probabilities of risk versus large rewards as opposed to situations where you can do a thing that affects a large number of people one way and a small number of people another way? I think the gambles are more like decisions that you make a bunch and you should be rational about and then just the second thing in terms of like, I don't know, I took you to be making some sort of argument along the lines of there's evolutionary pressure to want to not kill yourself. Therefore, that's like a debunking explanation. The fact that there was evolutionary pressure to not kill ourselves means that our instinct that we shouldn't kill ourselves is irrational. Whereas I would tend to look at it and say the fact that there was very strong evolutionary pressure to not kill ourselves is an explanation of why I don't want to kill myself. And I see that as affirming the choice to not kill myself, actually.AARONWell, I just want to say I don't think it's an affirmative argument that it is irrational. I think it opens up the question. I think it means it's more plausible that for other I guess not even necessarily for other reasons, but it just makes it more plausible that it is irrational. Well.DANIELYeah, I take exactly the opposite view. Okay. I think that if I'm thinking about, like, oh, what do I really want? If I consider my true preferences, do I really want to kill myself or something? And then I learn that, oh, evolution has shaped me to not kill myself, I think the inference I should make is like, oh, I guess probably the way evolution did that is that it made it such that my true desires are to not kill myself.AARONYeah. So one thing is I just don't think preferences have any intrinsic value. So I don't know, we might just like I guess I should ask, do you agree with that or disagree with.DANIELThat do I think preferences have intrinsic value? No, but so no, but I think like, the whole game here is like, what do I prefer? Or like, what would I prefer if I understood things really clearly?AARONYes. And this is something I didn't really highlight or maybe I didn't say it at all, is that I forget if I really argue it or kind of just assert it, but I at least assert that the answer to hedonic utilitarian. What you should do under hedonic utilitarianism is maybe not identical to, but exactly the same as what a rational agent would do or what a rational agent would prefer if they were to experience everything that this agent would cause. Or something like that. And so these should give you the exact same answers is something I believe sure. Because I do think preferences are like we're built to understand or sort of intuit and reason about our own preferences.DANIELKind of, yeah. But broadly, I guess the point I'm making at a high level is just like if we're talking about what's ethical or what's good or whatever, I take this to ultimately be a question about what should I understand myself as preferring? Or to the extent that it's not a question of that, then it's like, I don't know, then I'm a bit less interested in the exercise.AARONYeah. It's not ideal that I appeal to this fake and that fake ideally rational being or something. But here's a reason you might think it's more worth thinking about this. Maybe you've heard about I think Tomasic makes an argument about yeah. At least in principle, you can have a pig that's in extreme pain but really doesn't want to be killed still or doesn't want to be taken out of its suffering or whatever, true ultimate preference or whatever. And so at least I think this is pretty convincing evidence that you can have where that's just like, wrong about what would be good for it, you know what I mean?DANIELYeah, sorry, I'm not talking about preference versus hedonic utilitarianism or anything. I'm talking about what do I want or what do I want for living things or something. That's what I'm talking about.AARONYeah. That language elicits preferences to me and I guess the analogous but the idea.DANIELIs that the answer to what I want for living things could be like hedonic utilitarianism, if you see what I mean.AARONOr it could be by that do you mean what hedonic utilitarianism prescribes?DANIELYeah, it could be that what I want is that just whatever maximizes beings pleasure no matter what they want.AARONYeah. Okay. Yeah, so I agree with that.DANIELYeah. So anyway, heading back just to the suicide case right. If I learn that evolution has shaped me to not want to kill myself, then that makes me think that I'm being rational in my choice to not kill myself.AARONWhy?DANIELBecause being rational is something like optimally achieving your goals. And I'm a little bit like I sort of roughly know the results of killing myself, right? There might be some question about like, but what are my goals? And if I learned that evolution has shaped my goals such that I would hate killing myself right, then I'm like, oh, I guess killing myself probably ranks really low on the list of states ordered by how much I like them.AARONYeah, I guess then it seems like you have two mutually incompatible goals. Like, one is staying alive and one is hedonic utilitarianism and then you have to choose which of these predominates or whatever.DANIELYeah, well, I think that to the extent that evolution is shaping me to not want to commit suicide, it looks like the not killing myself one is winning. I think it's evidence. I don't think it's conclusive. Right. Because there could be multiple things going on. But I take evolutionary explanations for why somebody would want X. I think that's evidence that they are rational in pursuing X rather than evidence that they are irrational in pursuing X.AARONSometimes that's true, but not always. Yeah, there's a lot in general it is. Yeah. But I feel like moral anti realistic, we can also get into that. Are going to not think this is like woo or Joe Carl Smith says when he's like making fun of moralists I don't know, in a tongue in cheek way. In one of his posts arguing for explicating his stance on antirealism basically says moral realists want to say that evolution is not sensitive to moral reasons and therefore evolutionary arguments. Actually, I don't want to quote him from memory. I'll just assert that evolution is sensitive to a lot of things, but one of them is not moral reasons and therefore evolutionary arguments are not a good evidence or are not good evidence when it comes to purely, maybe not even purely, but philosophical claims or object level moral claims, I guess, yeah, they can be evidenced by something, but not that.DANIELYeah, I think that's wrong because I think that evolution why do I think it's wrong? I think it's wrong because what are we talking about when we talk about morality? We're talking about some logical object that's like the completion of a bunch of intuitions we have. Right. And those I haven't thought about intuitions are the product of evolution. The reason we care about morality at all is because of evolution under the standard theory that evolution is the reason our brains are the way they are.AARONYeah, I think this is a very strange coincidence and I am kind of weirded out by this, but yes, I.DANIELDon'T think it's a coincidence or like not a coincidence.AARONSo it's not a coincidence like conditional honor, evolutionary history. It is like no extremely lucky or something that we like, of course we'd find it earthlings wound up with morality and stuff. Well, of course you would.DANIELWait. Have you read the metafic sequence by Elizar? Yudkowski.AARONI don't think so. And I respect Elias a ton, except I think he's really wrong about ethics and meta ethics in a lot of like I don't even know if I but I have not, so I'm not really giving them full time.DANIELOkay. I don't know. I basically take this from my understanding of the meta ethics sequence, which I recommend people read, but I don't think it's a coincidence. I don't think we got lucky. I think it's a coincidence. There are some species that get evolved, right, and they end up caring about schmorality, right?AARONYeah.DANIELAnd there are some species that get evolved, right? And they end up caring about the prime numbers or whatever, and we evolved and we ended up caring about morality. And it's not like a total so, okay, partly I'm just like, yeah, each one of them is really glad they didn't turn out to be the other things. The ones that care about two of.AARONThem are wrong, but two of them are wrong.DANIELWell, they're morally wrong. Two of them do morally wrong things all the time. Right?AARONI want to say that I hate when people say that. Sorry. So what I am saying is that you can call those by different names, but if I'm understanding this argument right, they all think that they're getting at the same core concept, which is like, no, what should we do in some okay, so does schmorality have any sort of normativity?DANIELNo, it has schmormativity.AARONOkay, well, I don't know what schmormativity is.DANIELYou know how normativity I feel like that's good. Schmormativity is about promoting the schmud.AARONOkay, so it sounds like that's just normativity, except it's normativity about different propositions. That's what it sounds like.DANIELWell, basically, I don't know, instead of these schmalians wait, no, they're aliens. They're not shmalians. They're aliens. They just do a bunch of schmud things, right? They engage in projects, they try and figure out what the schmud is. They pursue a schmud and then they look at humans, they're like, oh, these humans are doing morally good things. That's horrible. I'm so glad that we pursue the schmood instead.AARONYeah, I don't know if it's incoherent. I don't think they're being incoherent. Your description of a hypothetical let's just take for granted whatever in the thought experiment is in fact happening. I think your description is not correct. And the reason it's not correct is because there is like, what's a good analogy? So when it comes to abstract concepts in general, it is very possible for okay, I feel like it's hard to explain directly, but here an analogy, is you can have two different people who have very different conceptions of justice, but fundamentally are earnestly trying to get at the same thing. Maybe justice isn't well defined or isn't like, actually, I should probably have come up with a good example here. But you know what? I'm happy to change the word for what I use as morality or whatever, but it has the same core meaning, which is like, okay, really, what should you do at the end of the day?DANIELYeah.AARONWhat should you do?DANIELWhereas they care about morality, which is what they should do, which is a different thing. They have strong desires to do what they should do.AARONI don't think it is coherent to say that there are multiple meanings of the word should or multiple kinds. Yeah.DANIELNo, there aren't.AARONSorry. There aren't multiple meanings of the word should. Fine.DANIELThere's just a different word, which is schmood, which means something different, and that's what their desires are pegged to.AARONI don't think it's coherent, given what you've already the entire picture, I think, is incoherent. Given everything else besides the word schmoud, it is incoherent to assert that there is something broadly not analogous, like maybe isomorphic to normativity or, like, the word should. Yeah. There is only what's yeah. I feel like I'm not gonna I'm not gonna be able to verbalize it super well. I do. Yeah. Can you take something can you pick.DANIELA sentence that I said that was wrong or that was incoherent?AARONWell, it's all wrong because these aliens don't exist.DANIELThe aliens existed.AARONOkay, well, then we're debating, like, I actually don't know. It depends. You're asserting something about their culture and psychology, and then the question is, like, are you right or wrong about that? If we just take for granted that you're right, then you're right. All right. I'm saying no, you can't be sure. So conditional on being right, you're right. Then there's a question of, like, okay, what is the probability? So, like, conditional on aliens with something broad, are you willing to accept this phrase, like, something broadly analogous to morality? Is that okay?DANIELYeah, sure.AARONOkay. So if we accept that there's aliens with something broadly analogous to morality, then you want to say that they can have not only a different word, but truly a pointer to a different concept. And I think that's false.DANIELSo you think that in conceptual space, there's morality and that there's, like, nothing near it for miles.AARONThe study, like yeah, basically. At least when we're talking about, like, the like, at the at the pre conclusion stage. So, like, before you get to the point where you're like, oh, yeah, I'm certain that, like, the answer is just that we need, like, we need to make as many tennis balls as possible or whatever the general thing of, like, okay, broadly, what is the right thing to do? What should I do? Would it be good for me to do this cluster of things yeah. Is, like, miles from everything else.DANIELOkay. I think there's something true to that. I think I agree with that in some ways and on others, my other response is I think it's not a total coincidence that humans ended up caring about morality. I think if you look at these evolutionary arguments for why humans would be motivated to pursue morality. They rely on very high level facts. Like, there are a bunch of humans around. There's not one human who's, like, a billion times more powerful than everyone else. We have language. We talk through things. We reason. We need to make decisions. We need to cooperate in certain ways to produce stuff. And it's not about the fact that we're bipedal or something. So in that sense, I think it's not a total coincidence that we ended up caring about morality. And so in some sense, I think because that's true, you could maybe say you couldn't slightly tweak our species that it cared about something other than morality, which is kind of like saying that there's nothing that close to morality in concept space.AARONBut I think I misspoke earlier what I should have said is that it's very weird that we care about that most people at least partially care about suffering and happiness. I think that's just a true statement. Sorry, that is the weird thing. Why is it weird? The weird thing is that it happens to be correct, even though I only.DANIELHave what do you mean it's correct?AARONNow we have to get okay, so this is going into moral realism. I think moral realism is true, at least.DANIELSorry, what do you mean by moral realism? Wait, different by moral realism?AARONYes. So I actually have sort of a weak version of moral realism, which is, like, not that normative statements are true, but that there is, like, an objective. So if you can rank hypothetical states of the world in an ordinal way such that one is objectively better than another.DANIELYes. Okay. I agree with that, by the way. I think that's true. Okay.AARONIt sounds like you're a moral realist.DANIELYeah, I am.AARONOkay. Oh, really? Okay. I don't know. I thought you weren't. Okay, cool.DANIELLots of people in my reference class aren't. I think most Bay Area rationalists are not moral realists, but I am.AARONOkay. Maybe I was confused. Okay, that's weird. Okay. Sorry about that. Wait, so what do I mean by it happens to be true? It's like it happens to coincide with yeah, sorry, go ahead.DANIELYou said it happens to be correct that we care about morality or that we care about suffering and pleasure and something and stuff.AARONMaybe that wasn't the ideal terminology it happens to so, like, it's not morally correct? The caring about it isn't the morally correct thing. It seems sort of like the caring is instrumentally useful in promoting what happens to be legitimately good or something. Or, like legitimately good or something like that.DANIELBut but I think, like so the aliens could say a similar thing, right? They could say, like, oh, hey, we've noticed that we all care about schmurality. We all really care about promoting Schmeasure and avoiding Schmuffering. Right? And they'd say, like, they'd say, like, yeah, what's? What's wrong?AARONI feel like it's not maybe I'm just missing something, but at least to me, it's like, only adding to the confusion to talk about two different concepts of morality rather than just like, okay, this alien thinks that you should tile the universe paperclips, or something like that, or even that more reasonably, more plausibly. Justice is like that. Yeah. I guess this gets back to there's only one concept anywhere near that vicinity in concept space or something. Maybe we disagree about that. Yeah.DANIELOkay. If I said paperclips instead of schmorality, would you be happy?AARONYes.DANIELI mean, cool, okay, for doing the.AARONMorally correct thing and making me happy.DANIELI strive to. But take the paperclipper species, right? What they do is they notice, like, hey, we really care about making paperclips, right? And, hey, the fact that we care about making paperclips, that's instrumentally useful in making sure that we end up making a bunch of paperclips, right? Isn't that an amazing coincidence that we ended up caring our desires were structured in this correct way that ends up with us making a bunch of paperclips. Is that like, oh, no, total coincidence. That's just what you cared about.AARONYou left at the part where they assert that they're correct about this. That's the weird thing.DANIELWhat proposition are they correct about?AARONOr sorry, I don't think they're correct implicitly.DANIELWhat proposition do they claim they're correct about?AARONThey claim that the world in which there is many paperclips is better than the world in which there is fewer paperclips.DANIELOh, no, they just think it's more paperclipy. They don't think it's better. They don't care about goodness. They care about paperclips.AARONSo it sounds like we're not talking about anything remotely like morality, then, because I could say, yeah, morality, morality. It's pretty airy. It's a lot of air in here. I don't know, maybe I'm just confused.DANIELNo, what I'm saying is, so you're like, oh, it's like this total coincidence that humans we got so lucky. It's so weird that humans ended up caring about morality, and it's like, well, we had to care about something, right? Like anything we don't care about.AARONOh, wow, sorry, I misspoke earlier. And I think that's generating some confusion. I think it's a weird coincidence that we care about happiness and suffering.DANIELHappiness and suffering, sorry. Yeah, but mutatus mutantus, I think you want to say that's like a weird coincidence. And I'm like, well, we had to care about something.AARONYeah, but it could have been like, I don't know, could it have been otherwise, right? At least conceivably it could have been otherwise.DANIELYeah, the paperclip guys, they're like, conceivably, we could have ended up caring about pleasure and suffering. I'm so glad we avoided that.AARONYeah, but they're wrong and we're right.DANIELRight about what?AARONAnd then maybe I don't agree. Maybe this isn't the point you're making. I'm sort of saying that in a blunt way to emphasize it. I feel like people should be skeptical when I say, like okay, I have good reason to think that even though we're in a very similar epistemic position, I have reason to believe that we're right and not the aliens. Right. That's like a hard case to make, but I do think it's true.DANIELThere's no proposition that the aliens and us disagree on yes.AARONThe intrinsic value of pleasure and happiness.DANIELYeah, no, they don't care about value. They care about schmalu, which is just.AARONLike, how much paperclips there is. I don't think that's coherent. I don't think they can care about value.DANIELOkay.AARONThey can, but only insofar as it's a pointer to the exact same not exact, but like, basically the same concept as our value.DANIELSo do you reject the orthogonality thesis?AARONNo.DANIELOkay. I think that is super intelligent.AARONYeah.DANIELSo I take the orthogonality thesis to mean that really smart agents can be motivated by approximately any desires. Does that sound right to you?AARONYeah.DANIELSo what if the desire is like, produce a ton of paperclips?AARONYeah, it can do that descriptively. It's not morally good.DANIELOh, no, it's not morally good at all. They're not trying to be morally good. They're just trying to produce a bunch of paperclips.AARONOkay, in that case, we don't disagree. Yeah, I agree. This is like a conceivable state of the world.DANIELYeah. But what I'm trying to say is when you say it's weird that we got lucky the reason you think it's weird is that you're one of the humans who cares about pleasure and suffering. Whereas if you were one of the aliens who cared about paperclips. The analogous shmarin instead of Aaron would be saying, like, oh, it's crazy that we care about paperclips, because that actually causes us to make a ton of paperclips.AARONDo they intrinsically care about paperclips or is it a means of cement?DANIELIntrinsically, like, same as in the Orphogonality thesis.AARONDo they experience happiness because of the paperclips or is it more of a functional intrinsic value?DANIELI think they probably experience happiness when they create paperclips, but they're not motivated by the happiness. They're motivated by like, they're happy because they succeeded at their goal of making tons of paperclips. If they can make tons of paperclips but not be happy about it, they'd be like, yeah, we should do that. Sorry. No, they wouldn't. They'd say, like, we should do that and then they would do it.AARONWould your case still work if we just pretended that they're not sentient?DANIELYeah, sure.AARONOkay. I think this makes it cleaner for both sides. Yeah, in that case, yes. So I think the thing that I reject is that there's an analog term that's anything like morality in their universe. They can use a different word, but it's pointing to the same concept.DANIELWhen you say anything like morality. So the shared concepts sorry, the shared properties between morality and paperclip promotion is just that you have a species that is dedicated to promoting it.AARONI disagree. I think morality is about goodness and badness.DANIELYes, that's right.AARONOkay. And I think it is totally conceivable. Not even conceivable. So humans wait, what's a good example? In some sense I intrinsically seem to value about regular. I don't know if this is a good example. Let's run with it intrinsically value like regulating my heartbeat. It happens to be true that this is conducive to my happiness and at least local non suffering. But even if it weren't, my brain stem would still try really hard to keep my heart beating or something like that. I reject that there's any way in which promoting heart beatingness is an intrinsic moral or schmoral value or even that could be it could be hypothesized as one but it is not in fact one or something like that.DANIELOkay.AARONLikewise, these aliens could claim that making paperclips is intrinsically good. They could also just make them and not make that claim. And those are two very different things.DANIELThey don't claim it's good. They don't think it's good.AARONThey think it's claim it schmud.DANIELWhich they prefer. Yeah, they prefer.AARONDon't. I think that is also incoherent. I think there is like one concept in that space because wait, I feel like also this is just like at some point it has to cash out in the real world. Right? Unless we're talking about really speculative not even physics.DANIELWhat I mean is they just spend all of their time promoting paperclips and then you send them a copy of Jeremy Bentham's collected writings, they read it and they're like all right, cool. And then they just keep on making paperclips because that's what they want to do.AARONYeah. So descriptively.DANIELSure.AARONBut they never claim that. It's like we haven't even introduced objectivity to this example. So did they ever claim that it's objectively the right thing to do?DANIELNo, they claim that it's objectively the paperclipy thing to do.AARONI agree with that. It is the paperclippy thing to do.DANIELYeah, they're right about stuff. Yeah.AARONSo they're right about that. They're just not a right. So I do think this all comes back down to the question of whether there's analogous concepts in near ish morality that an alien species might point at. Because if there's not, then the paperclippiness is just like a totally radically different type of thing.DANIELBut why does it like when did I say that they were closely analogous? This is what I don't understand.AARONSo it seems to be insinuated by the closeness of the word semantic.DANIELOh yeah, whatever. When I was making it a similar sounding word, all I meant to say is that they talk about it plays a similar role in their culture as morality plays in our culture. Sorry. In terms of their motivations, I should say. Oh, yeah.AARONI think there's plenty of human cultures that are getting at morality. Yeah. So I think especially historically, plenty of human cultures that are getting at the same core concept of morality but just are wrong about it.DANIELYeah, I think that's right.AARONFundamentalist religious communities or whatever, you can't just appeal to like, oh, we're like they have some sort of weird it's kind of similar but very different thing called morality.DANIELAlthough, I don't know, I actually think that okay, backing up. All I'm saying is that beings have to care about something, and we ended up caring about morality. And I don't think, like I don't know, I don't think that's super surprising or coincidental or whatever. A side point I want to make is that I think if you get super into being religious, you might actually start referring to a different concept by morality. How familiar are you with classical theism?AARONThat's not a term that I recognize, although I took a couple of theology classes, so maybe more of them if I hadn't done that.DANIELYeah, so classical theism, it's a view about the nature of God, which is that I'm going to do a bad job of describing it. Yeah, I'm not a classical theist, so you shouldn't take classical theist doctrine from me. But it's basically that God is like sort of God's the being whose attributes are like his existence or something like that. It's weird. But anyway, there's like some school of philosophical where they're like, yeah, there's this transcendent thing called God. We can know God exists from first principles and in particular their account of goodness. So how do you get around the Euphyro dilemma, right? Instead of something like divine command theory, what they say is that when we talk about things being good, good just refers to the nature of God. And if you really internalize that, then I think you might end up referring to something different than actual goodness. Although I think it's probably there's no such being as God in the article. Theist sense.AARONYeah. So they argue what we mean by good is this other.DANIELConcept. They would say that when everyone talks about good, what they actually mean is pertaining to the divine nature, but we just didn't really know that we meant that the same way that when we talked about water, we always meant H 20, but we didn't used to know that.AARONI'm actually not sure if this is I'm very unconfident, but I kind of want to bite the bullet and say, like, okay, fine, in that case, yeah, I'm talking about the divine nature, but we just have radically different understandings of what the divine nature is.DANIELYou think you're talking about the divine nature.AARONRight?DANIELWhy do you think that?AARONSorry, I think I very slightly was not quite pedantic enough. Sorry, bad cell phone or whatever. Once again, not very confident at all.DANIELBut.AARONThink think that I'm willing to I'm so I think that I'm referring to the divine nature, but what I mean by the divine nature is that which these fundamentalist people are referring to. So I want to get around the term and say like, okay, whatever these fundamentalists are referring to, I am also referring to them.DANIELYeah, I should say classical theism is not slightly a different when people say fundamentalists, they often mean like a different corner of Christian space than classical theists. Classical. Theists think like Ed Fesser esoteric Catholics or something. Yeah, they're super into it.AARONOkay, anyway yes, just to put it all together, I think that when I say morality, I am referring to the same thing that these people are referring to by the divine nature. That's what it took me like five minutes to actually say.DANIELOh yeah, so I don't think you are. So when they refer to the divine nature, what they at least think they mean is they think that the divine is sort of defined by the fact that its existence is logically necessary. Its existence is in some sense attributes it couldn't conceivably not have its various attributes. The fact that it is like the primary cause of the world and sustainer of all things. And I just really doubt that the nature of that thing is what you mean by morality.AARONNo, those are properties that they assert, but I feel like tell me if I'm wrong. But my guess is that if one such person were to just suddenly come to believe that actually all of that's right. Except it's not actually logically necessary that the divine nature exists. It happens to be true, but it's not logically necessary. They would still be sort of pointing to the same concept. And I just think, yeah, it's like that, except all those lists of properties are wrong.DANIELI think if that were true, then classical theism would be false.AARONOkay.DANIELSo maybe in fact you're referring to the same thing that they actually mean by the divine nature, but what they think they mean is this classical theistic thing. Right. And it seems plausible to me that some people get into it enough that what they actually are trying to get at when they say good is different than what normal people are trying to get at when they say good.AARONYeah, I don't think that's true. Okay, let's set aside the word morality because especially I feel like in circles that we're in, it has a strong connotation with a sort of like modern ish analytics philosophy, maybe like some other things that are in that category.DANIELYour video is worsen, but your sound is back.AARONOkay, well, okay, I'll just keep talking. All right, so you have the divine nature and morality and maybe other things that are like those two things but still apart from them. So in that class of things and then there's the question of like, okay, maybe everybody necessarily anybody who thinks that there's any true statements about something broadly in their vicinity of goodness in the idea space is pointing to the meta level of that or whichever one of those is truly correct or something. This is pretty speculative. I have not thought about this. I'm not super confident.DANIELYeah, I think I broadly believe this, but I think this is right about most people when they talk. But you could imagine even with utilitarianism, right? Imagine somebody getting super into the weeds of utilitarianism. They lived utilitarianism twenty four, seven. And then maybe at some point they just substitute in utilitarianism for morality. Now when they say morality, they actually just mean utilitarianism and they're just discarding the latter of the broad concepts and intuitions behind them. Such a person might just I don't know, I think that's the kind of thing that can happen. And then you might just want a.AARONDifferent thing by the word. I don't know if it's a bad thing, but I feel like I do this when I say, oh, x is moral to do or morally good to do. It's like, what's the real semantic relationship between that and it's correct on utilitarianism to do? I feel like they're not defined as the same, but they happen to be the same or something. Now we're just talking about how people use words.DANIELYeah, they're definitely going to happen to be the same in the case that utilitarianism is like the right theory of morality. But you could imagine that. You could imagine even in the case where utilitarianism was the wrong theory, you might still just mean utilitarianism by the word good because you just forgot the intuitions from which you were building theory of morality and you're just like, okay, look, I'm just going to talk about utilitarianism now.AARONYeah, I think this is like, yeah, this could happen. I feel like this is a cop out and like a non answer, but I feel like getting into the weeds of the philosophy of language and what people mean by concepts and words and true the true nature of concepts. It's just not actually that useful. Or maybe it's just not as interesting to me as I'm glad that somebody thought about that ever.DANIELI think this can happen, though. I think this is actually a practical concern. Right. Okay. Utilitarianism might be wrong, right? Does that strike you as right? Yeah, I think it's possible for you to use language in such a way that if utilitarianism were wrong, what that would mean is that in ordinary language, goodness, the good thing to do is not always the utilitarian thing to do, right? Yes, but I think it's possible to get down an ideological rabbit hole. This is not specific to utilitarianism. Right. I think this can happen to tons of things where when you say goodness, you just mean utilitarianism and you don't have a word for what everyone else meant by goodness, then I think that's really hard to recover from. And I think that's the kind of thing that can conceivably happen and maybe sometimes actually happens.AARONYeah, I guess as an empirical matter and like an empirical psychological matter and yes. Do people's brains ever operate this way? Yes. I don't really know where that leaves that leaves us. Maybe we should move on to a different topic or whatever.DANIELCan I just say one more thing?AARONYeah, totally.DANIELFirst, I should just give this broad disclaimer that I'm not a philosopher and I don't really know what I'm talking about. But the second thing is that particular final point. I was sort of inspired by a paper I read. I think it's called, like, do Christians and Muslims worship the same god? Which is actually a paper about the philosophy of naming and what it means for proper names to refer to the same thing. And it's pretty interesting, and it has a footnote about why you would want to discourage blasphemy, which is sort of about this. Anyway.AARONNo, I personally don't find this super interesting. I can sort of see how somebody would and I also think it's potentially important, but I think it's maybe yeah.DANIELActually it's actually kind of funny. Can I tell you a thing that I'm a little bit confused about?AARONYeah, sure.DANIELSo philosophers just there's this branch of philosophy that's the philosophy of language, and in particular the philosophy of right. Like, what does it mean when we say a word refers to something in the real world? And some subsection of this is the philosophy of proper names. Right. So when I say Aaron is going to the like, what do I mean by know who is like, if it turned out that these interactions that I'd been having with an online like, all of them were faked, but there was a real human named Bergman, would that count as making that send is true or whatever? Anyway, there's some philosophy on this topic, and apparently we didn't need it to build a really smart AI. No AI person has studied this. Essentially, these theories are not really baked into the way we do AI these days.AARONWhat do you think that implies or suggests?DANIELI think it's a bit confusing. I think naively, you might have thought that AIS would have to refer to things, and naively, you might have thought that in order for us to make that happen, we would have had to understand the philosophy of reference or of naming, at least on some sort of basic level. But apparently we just didn't have to. Apparently we could just like I don't have that.AARONIn fact, just hearing your description, my initial intuition is like, man, this does not matter for anything.DANIELOkay. Can I try and convince you that it should matter? Yeah, tell me how I fail to convince you.AARONYeah, all right.DANIELHumans are pretty smart, right? We're like the prototypical smart thing. How are humans smart? I think one of the main ingredients of that is that we have language. Right?AARONYes. Oh, and by the way, this gets to the unpublished episode with Nathan Barnard.DANIELComing out an UN I think I've seen an episode with him.AARONOh, yeah. This is the second one because he's.DANIELBeen very oh, exciting. All right, well well, maybe all this will be superseded by this unpublished episode.AARONI don't think so. We'll see.DANIELBut okay, we have language, right. Why is language useful? Well, I think it's probably useful in part because it refers to stuff. When I say stuff, I'm talking about the real world, right?AARONYes.DANIELNow, you might think that in order to build a machine that was smart and wielded the language usefully, it would also have to have language. We would have to build it such that its language referred to the real world. Right. And you might further think that in order to build something that use languages that actually succeeds at doing reference, we would have to understand what reference was.AARONYes. I don't think that's right. Because insofar as we can get what we call useful is language in, language out without any direct interaction, without the AIS directly manipulating the world, or maybe not directly, but without using language understanders or beings that do have this reference property, that's what their language means to them, then this would be right. But because we have Chat GPT, what the use comes from is like giving language to humans, and the humans have reference to the real world. But if the humans you need some connection to your reference, but it doesn't have to be at every level or something like that.DANIELOkay, so do you think that suppose we had something that was like Chat GPT, but we gave it access to some robot limbs and it could pick up mice. Maybe it could pick up apples and throw the apples into the power furnace powering its data center. We give it these limbs and these actuators sort of analogous to how humans interact with the world. Do you think in order to make a thing like that that worked, we would need to understand the philosophy of reference?AARONNo. I'm not sure why.DANIELI also don't know why.AARONOkay, well, evolution didn't understand the philosophy of reference. I don't know what that tells us.DANIELI actually think this is, like, my lead answer of, like, we're just making AIS by just randomly tweaking them until they work. That's my rough summary of Scastic gradient descent. In some sense, this does not require you to have a strong sense of how to implement your AIS. Maybe that's why we don't need to.AARONUnderstand philosophy or the SDD process is doing the philosophy. In some sense, that's kind of how I think about it or how I think about it now. I guess during the SDD process, you're, like, tweaking basically the algorithm, and at the end of the day, probably in order to, say, pick up marbles or something, reference to a particular marble or the concept of marble, not only the concept, but both the concept

On this episode we dive deep into personal growth and well-being with the help of the Healy device. Our host, Analena, shares her experience using Healy to align with her highest potential and become more grounded in her true self. She discusses how Human Design and the Healy device have helped her and her guest, Alexandra Danieli, break free from the habit of following other people's processes in business and instead do things according to their unique traits. We also learn about the science behind the Healy device and how it can support physical, mental, emotional, and financial well-being. Tune in to discover how the Healy community is changing lives and uncover the potential for the collective through these sending to help listeners achieve success with ease and joy. About Alexandra: Alexandra Danieli is a 1/3 Self-Projected Projector who discovered her true purpose through Human Design first. Previously, she had struggled to find success in society's prescribed ways of doing business, as they didn't make her feel successful. Learning about how Projectors are meant to operate in the bigger picture helped her activate her superpower and switch on more and more. Now, she continues to learn about her Design and enjoys the process of becoming more aligned with her true self. In addition, she has been using the Healy device for over two years, which has been instrumental in her Deconditoning journey. Not only has it greatly aided her own progress, but it has also empowered her to support more people, all while embracing the financial support she receives for doing so. Interested to learn more about the Healy and/or Human Design? Get in touch with Alexandra or Analena Alexandra's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/alexandra.danieli/ Alexandra's Website: https://www.alexandradanieli.com/ Analena's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/analena.fuchs/ Analena's Website: https://analenafuchs.com/ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-art-of-slowing-down/message

In der heutigen Folge „Alles auf Aktien“ sprechen die Finanzjournalisten Lena Zimmermann und Laurin Meyer über eingeschränkte Sicht bei Zoom, einen großen Apple-Deal und keine schlechten Nachrichten bei Uniper. Außerdem geht es um Broadcom, Qualcomm, Meta, Shutterstock, Julius Bär, Shell, Carlsberg, Metro, Bonduelle, Procter & Gamble, Danieli, Xiaomi, Mondi, E.on, ENBW, Meyer Burger, JinkoSolar, Longi Silicon Materials, TrinaSolar, Maxeon Solar Technologies, Enphase Energy, First Solar und SMA Solar Technology. Wir freuen uns über Feedback an aaa@welt.de. Disclaimer: Die im Podcast besprochenen Aktien und Fonds stellen keine spezifischen Kauf- oder Anlage-Empfehlungen dar. Die Moderatoren und der Verlag haften nicht für etwaige Verluste, die aufgrund der Umsetzung der Gedanken oder Ideen entstehen. Für alle, die noch mehr wissen wollen: Holger Zschäpitz können Sie jede Woche im Finanz- und Wirtschaftspodcast "Deffner&Zschäpitz" hören. Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

Jätkame eelmises saates alustatud teemal, nõukogude kirjanike Juli Danieli ja Andrei Sinjavski kohtuprotsessil, kus neid süüdistati oma loomingus nõukogude riigi vastu suunatud propagandistlike materjalide levitamises.

Saates kuuleme, kuidas 1965. aasta alguses sekkub NSV Liit Vietnami sõtta, saates Põhja-Vietnami relvajõududele sõjalist abi, sealhulgas rasketehnikat, relvi ja sõdurite väljaõpet.

In today's episode, I'm chatting with Alex Danieli, a self-projected projector who works with other projectors to help them live their purpose and earn money doing work they love. We're talking about running your own business as a projector, how to check in with yourself when you're out of alignment, the importance of having a strong relationship with your G center, and so much more. I hope that this episode inspires you to get more in touch with your authority and find more alignment in your life. What you'll find in this episode: [01:18] How Alex discovered human design, her questions early on about how to be a projector, and her perspective on running a business as a projector [08:42] How Alex checks in with herself when she's out of alignment with her human design authority, and how she works with her self-projected authority [17:32] How visualizing, journaling and soundboarding can be helpful for projectors, and how to have a stronger relationship with your G center and how that can help you in your business as a projector [24:34] The importance of always checking back in with your authority if you have any undefined centers that can be influenced by others, and how to navigate an experience like that [27:52] How this authority needs varying amounts of time to make a decisions depending on the situation, and the importance of alone time and connecting with your energy solo For full show notes, resources, and link, head to https://www.dralyssaadams.com/uncommon-couch-podcast If you enjoyed this show, make sure to follow the podcast so you'll never miss an episode. Want to get to know me more? Find out more about me on my website or by following along on Instagram!

Un itinerario fra fiumi e oceano per scoprire New York da un punto di vista alternativo e un ritratto di Carlo III come paladino della moda responsabile. Nella versione Weekend di Start parliamo anche di un festival fra design e arte sul Lago di Como e dei duecento anni di un hotel simbolo di Venezia

Un itinerario fra fiumi e oceano per scoprire New York da un punto di vista alternativo e un ritratto di Carlo III come paladino della moda responsabile. Nella versione Weekend di Start parliamo anche di un festival fra design e arte sul Lago di Como e dei duecento anni di un hotel simbolo di Venezia

Pyramid Blood is thrilled to announce Danieli[i]'s long-awaited new EP, LOOPS FOR NOW, an enchanting journey of healing and discovery. Daniel[i]'s deep and inviting soundscapes completely envelop the senses in a warm, drifting organic ambiance, blissfully transporting us into a peaceful world of dreamlike wonder. Our premiere for today, LfN 04 is a journey full of dark ambient tones, rich atmospheres and deep emotional undercurrents. LOOPS FOR NOW is coming out on August 29 via Pyramid Blood. https://soundcloud.com/danieli_whs https://www.instagram.com/dan_whispering_signals/ https://soundcloud.com/pyramid-blood-recordings www.itsdelayed.com www.instagram.com/_itsdelayed_ www.facebook.com/itsdelayed

Adam and Carl chat with Danieli Parker (@danieli_parker), Director of Instructional Technology from Hallsville ISD (@HallsvilleISD), about creating a culture of change with building leaders and how to sustain technology integration in schools. Future Ready Schools Website: https://all4ed.org/future-ready-schools/Twitter: @FutureReady, @AskAdam3, @MrHookerInstagram: @FutureReadySchools, @APhyall, @HookerTechFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/FutureReadySchoolsFuture Ready Schools is a registered trademark of All4Ed, located in Washington, D.C. #FutureReady

Adam Danieli håller snabbt på att bli en av DEKONSTRUKTIV KRITIKs nya favoriter. Han håller på med en serie rapporter åt tankesmedjan Timbro där han analyserar vad hundra år av socialdemokratiskt maktinnehav gjort med den demokratiska spelplanen. I förra avsnittet med Adam gick vi igenom hur socialdemokraterna missbrukar utnämningsmakten till att ge förmåner och belöningar åt sina anhängare och kompisar. I rapport nummer två kartlägger han socialdemokratins kommandohöjder. For more info: https://bit.ly/DK_AdamDanieli2 STÖTTA DEKONSTRUKTIV KRITIK på: SWISH 0046768943737 paypal.me/ARONFLAM Patreon: bit.ly/ARONFLAMDK Bitcoin: 3EPQMEMVh6MtG3bTbGc71Yz8NrMAMF4kSH

Adam Danieli gästar #DEKONSTRUKTIVKRITIK för att tala om hur socialdemokraterna riggat den demokratiska spelplanen för att säkra makten. For more info: https://bit.ly/DK_AdamDanieli1 STÖTTA DEKONSTRUKTIV KRITIK på: SWISH 0046768943737 paypal.me/ARONFLAM Patreon: bit.ly/ARONFLAMDK Bitcoin: 3EPQMEMVh6MtG3bTbGc71Yz8NrMAMF4kSH

“Struggling is in our hard-wiring. Suffering is not” - Alexandra Danieli Alexandra Danieli is a Human Design Coach and Mentor. On her journey she gained invaluable experience working in the German Stock exchange and continued to scale while holding position in one of the Big 4 Accounting firms. She helped multiple Silicon Valley start-ups through their development stages and through her involvement in product management. This in-depth hands on experience paved the way for her own success as the co-founder of a successful Tech Startup. After liquidating her startup for a comfortable living, she leaned into her real passion of coaching with all of the incredible experience she accumulated on her journey. She now helps people live their lives in a place of understanding and empowerment through Human Design! You Don't Want to Miss: What Human Design is! How knowing your Human Design Type can help YOU! How Human Design impacts raising children and parenting Where to ever begin!!! AND SO MUCH MORE!! Links And Resources: Follow Alexandra on Instagram @alexandra.danieli Grab Your FREE Self-Love Activation Meditation and Self-Care List at: http://theabundancealchemist.com/ The Abundance Alchemist Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/theabundancealchemisttribe Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/caitlyn.theabundancealchemist/ Make sure you hit SUBSCRIBE so you don't miss out on any transformational thoughts, ideas, or inspiration! And, if you enjoyed this episode, please leave me a rating and a review! Sending you so much love and gratitude!