Podcasts about danielas

Heute geht es um eine besondere Kombination im Katzentraining: Tellington TTouch und Clickertraining. Für dieses Thema, habe ich mir Verstärkung geholt. Dr. Daniela Zurr, Verhaltenstierärztin und TTouch-Instruktorin, erklärt, wie du durch gezielte Berührungen und Training mit positiver Verstärkung die Beziehung zu deiner Katze verbessern kannst. Im Interview sprechen wir darüber, wie TTouch Katzen hilft, sich im eigenen Körper wohler zu fühlen, wie du feine Körpersignale besser wahrnehmen kannst und warum Training nicht immer nur bedeutet, neue Tricks zu lernen, sondern auch mehr Sicherheit und Vertrauen aufzubauen. Heute erfährst du... - was Tellington TTouch genau ist und wie es Katzen unterstützt - warum sanfte Berührungen und Training sich wunderbar ergänzen - wie du durch genaues Beobachten das Training für deine Katze verbessern kannst - wie du auch bei schüchternen Katzen Vertrauen aufbaust - Einblicke in Danielas neue Ausbildung „Touch & Click“ für Katzenmenschen - praktische Tipps für deine ersten TTouch-Versuche zu Hause ** Mehr von mir: ** [Mein Instagram Kanal ](https://www.instagram.com/clicker.cat/) [Meine Webseite](https://clickercat.ch/) [Mein Booklet mit 33-Ideen für deinen Katzenalltag ](https://clickercat.ch/33-ideen/)(für 0€) **So kannst du mit mir arbeiten** [Clicker Cat Club](https://myablefy.com/s/katzentraining/CCC/payment): Jahresbegleitung, für dich und deine Katze, wenn du deine Katze mit Medical Training, Clickertraining und kooperativem Training im Alltag unterstützen möchtest [Super-Rückruf](https://clickercat.ch/super-rueckruf/): Der wichtigste Life-Skill für deine Katze **Weitere Informationen zu Daniela:** Danielas Webseite: https://www.tierverhalten-zurr.de/ Touch & Click Ausbildung: [Hier klicken](https://www.ttouch-n-click.de/ausbildung-ttouch-n-click-fuer-hunde-und-kleintiere/termin-2025-07-katze-daniela-zurr/) Newsletter zu Tellington TTouch: [Hier anmelden](https://tellington-methode.de/newsticker/) Ich freue mich, dass du heute wieder reingehört hast. Alles Liebe Chris

“When we show the world that we're not what they say about us, that we're not white colonizers, that we're actually an indigenous tribe of people that was kicked out of their homeland . . .  the only argument I can think about to put against the story is ‘you're lying.' . . . If they accuse you of lying when you tell your family story, they lost.” Last week's episode featuring Adiel Cohen—Jewish activist, social media influencer, and Israel Defense Forces reservist—received heartfelt feedback. In part two of this conversation, Adiel joins us live from the AJC Global Forum 2024 in Washington, D.C., where listeners had the chance to ask their questions directly. Adiel discusses a plethora of topics, including his social media activism and how Israeli society today reflects the story of Jews returning to their ancestral homeland after over 2,000 years in the diaspora, refuting the false narrative that Jews are white settler colonialists.  If you haven't heard The Forgotten Exodus: Yemen: Live Recording with Adiel Cohen – Part 1, listen now.  —--- How much do you know about Jewish history in the Middle East? Take our short quiz! Sign up to receive podcast updates here. Learn more about the series here: The Forgotten Exodus: Yemen: Live Recording with Adiel Cohen – Part 1 The Forgotten Exodus: Yemen, with Israeli Olympian Shahar Tzubari Song credits:  Pond5:  “Desert Caravans”: Publisher: Pond5 Publishing Beta (BMI), Composer: Tiemur Zarobov (BMI), IPI#1098108837 “Meditative Middle Eastern Flute”: Publisher: N/A; Composer: DANIELYAN ASHOT MAKICHEVICH (IPI NAME #00855552512) “Suspense Middle East” Publisher: Victor Romanov, Composer: Victor Romanov; Item ID: 196056047 —-- Episode Transcript: Adiel Cohen:   When we show the world that we're not what they say about us, that we're not white colonizers, that we're actually an indigenous tribe of people that was kicked out of their homeland and spread throughout the diaspora for 2000 years . . . they can try to argue with that. But at the end of the day, the facts are on our side. Manya Brachear Pashman: The world has overlooked an important episode in modern history: the 800,000 Jews who left or were driven from their homes in the Middle East and North Africa in the mid-20th century. Welcome to the second season of The Forgotten Exodus, brought to you by American Jewish Committee. This series explores that pivotal moment in history and the little-known Jewish heritage of Iran and Arab nations. As Jews around the world confront violent antisemitism and Israelis face daily attacks by terrorists on multiple fronts, our second season explores how Jews have lived throughout the region for generations–despite hardship, hostility, and hatred–then sought safety and new possibilities in their ancestral homeland. I'm your host, Manya Brachear Pashman:. Join us as we explore untold family histories and personal stories of courage, perseverance, and resilience from this transformative period of history for the Jewish people and the Middle East.  The world has ignored these voices. We will not. This is The Forgotten Exodus.  There has been moving and frankly overwhelming feedback from listeners of our second season, especially last week's live interview with digital influencer Adiel Cohen: about his family's journey from Yemen. If you didn't listen last week, be sure to go back and tune in. Then you'll know why there's been such a demand to release the second part of that interview – a question and answer session.  Why are we sharing this? It's a sampling of the conversations these episodes have generated in homes across the nation and around the world, inspired by this series. What would you ask our guests? Here's what a handful asked Adiel when he joined us at AJC Global Forum 2024 in Washington D.C.  Today's episode: Leaving Yemen, Part 2.  Thank you for this conversation, Adiel. But now I'd like to turn to our audience and give them an opportunity to ask what's on their minds. If you have a question, please raise your hand, someone will bring you a microphone. Be sure to state your name, where you're from, and keeping with the spirit of the event, tell us where your family is from going back generations. Audience Member/Carole Weintraub: Hi, thank you for coming. My name is Carole Weintraub. I'm from Philadelphia. And depending on the week, my family was either from Poland, Ukraine, or Russia – the borders changed all the time.  Adiel Cohen:   Oh wow, ok. Carole Weintraub: Take your pick. My question's kind of a fun question. You mentioned some dishes that your grandmom would make. You gave us the names, but I never heard of them, and could you describe them? Adiel Cohen:   Yes. So the main food that we eat, I would say it's like the equivalent to matzo ball soup. That's like the default dish for holidays, for day-to-day. It's Yemenite soup. It's just called Yemenite soup. It's very simple. It's a soup made with a lot of spices, I think. Kumkum and hell. It can be vegetable, chicken, or beef based, with a side of either potato or pumpkin inside the soup. It's very good, very healthy. We eat it, especially in winter, every Shabbat. Like it cleans your entire system, all the spices.  Some breads that we have that are also very common. Lachuch or lachoh, you know, in the Yemenite pronunciation, it's a flatbread similar to pancake. It's kind of like a pancake, only fried on one side with holes, yeah. And the other side, the top side becomes full of bubbles that turn into holes. So it's fluffy, like very, very soft, very good to eat with dips or with soup.  We also have saluf, which is just a regular pita, it's a flatbread. Zalabiyeh, which is kind of like the, in Yemen they used to eat it during Shavuot and in Israel, now we eat it a lot in Hanukkah, because it's fried. It's kind of like a flatbread donut. I don't know how else to explain it. Right. It's kind of like sufganiyah but made flat, like a pita. There's so much more wow, I'm starting to salivate here. Manya Brachear Pashman:   If you don't mind me just interjecting with one of my own questions, and that is, do you encourage people to make these recipes, to try out different parts of your culture or do you feel a little bit of or maybe fear appropriation of your culture? Like what is… Adiel Cohen:   No, not at all. Go look up Yemenite soup recipe on Google. It's all there in English. And it's delicious. It's healthy. Do it, really. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Do you try other Jewish cultures in fact? Adiel Cohen:   Kubbeh must be one of my favorite foods that is not Yemenite. It's Iraqi-Jewish. My hometown, Ramat Gan, is the capital of Iraqi Jews and Israel. Every time I say that I'm from Ramat Gan, people ask me ‘Oh, you're Iraqi?' I'm like, no, no, Yemenite. So kubbeh, sabich. Sabich, that's the best food, I think, Israel has to offer. Also Iraqi Jewish.  I feel bad that I don't have anything good to say about Ashkenazi foods. I tried matzo ball soup for the first time. I'm sorry. My sister, she married an Ashkenazi Jew from Monsey – can't get any more Ashkenazi than that. And this was actually my first time trying and getting a taste of Ashkenazi culture and cuisine. Can't say that it, like, blew me off. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Alright, next question. Audience Member/Amy Albertson: Hi, Adiel.  Adiel Cohen:   Hi, Amy. Amy Albertson: My name is Amy Albertson. I personally am from California and my family's from Russia, Poland, and China. And my question for you is, as a fellow social media creator, especially during times like this, I get asked a lot about racism in Israel since Americans are obsessed with racism. And they always want to point out how the Teimanim, the Yemenites, the Ethiopians, the other what Americans like to say not white Jews are discriminated against and have been discriminated against since the establishment of Israel.  Obviously, we can't deny that there is racism. However, I would like to know your perspective obviously as a Yemenite Jew living in Israel and also the good and the bad, where you find that things are hopefully better than they were in the past in Israel, and also where you think that Israeli society still has to improve when it comes to things like this. Adiel Cohen:   So part of the cultural discourse in Israel, we always make fun of how every wave of aliyah, from every place in the world that Israel experienced, the last wave of aliyah discriminates against them or makes fun of them, because ‘oh, the new ones.' And in a sense, it is true, you see it a lot. And racism, unfortunately, exists in Israel, in Israeli society, just like in every society in the world. I think that if you compare it to how it was in the 50s, we're way better off now.  And racism is widely condemned, all throughout Israeli society, against anyone, against any communities. We still have the stereotypes, we still have, you know, these jokes that sometimes are funny, sometimes are less funny about different communities. I would say for the most part, we know how to maintain a healthy humor of kind of making fun of each other as different communities but also making it all part of what it means to be Israeli. When my grandparents came to Israel, they were discriminated against. They were ‘othered' by the rest of society that was mostly dominated by secular Ashkenazim.  The same thing can also be said on Holocaust survivors that first arrived in Israel and also faced discrimination from their brothers and sisters, who are also Ashkenazim. So I don't know if racism is the right word. I don't think there's a word that can describe this dynamic that we have between our communities. But yeah, I definitely can say that throughout the generations it's become way better. We see way more diverse representation in Israeli media, in Israeli pop culture. If you look at what's Israeli pop culture, it's majority Mizrahi, and a lot of Yemenites if I may add, because, you know, we know how to sing. Not me, though, unfortunately. But yeah, we see a lot more representation. I believe we're on the right path to become more united and to bridge between our differences and different communities. Audience Member/Alison Platt: Hi, I'm Alison Platt. I live in Chicago by way of Northern California. My family is from all over Europe, and then about 1500 years before that Southern Italy. So I lost my grandmother last week, so I really thank you, I really appreciate the importance of telling our grandparents' stories. So thank you for sharing yours with us. For those of us who are millennials or Gen Z who are for better or worse, very online, storytelling is important and telling our own personal Jewish stories, very important, telling our collective Jewish story, very important. So for someone who does that on social media, what is your advice for those of us who are really trying to educate both on a one-to-one level and then communally about our Jewish identities, what has been successful for you, what has been challenging and where do you see that going? Adiel Cohen:   So, you know, telling a story, you can tell a story with words, you can also tell a story with visuals. Some of the most successful videos that I made about Yemenite Jews involved my grandma cooking and my mom cooking, making lachuch and showing the Seder, the table, how beautiful and colorful it is. So don't be afraid to pull up your phone and just show it when you see it. And in terms of verbal stories, speak to your grandparents as much as you can. When my grandma passed away, I realized how it can happen like that, and then that's it. And there's no more stories from Savta around Shabbat table and what you managed to gather, that's what you're carrying on to the future. So collect as many stories as possible from every generation so that these stories can live on and exist. And just tell them on social media, open your camera, tell it to the world, because this is how they get to know us. Audience Member/Ioel: Hi, everyone. I'm Ioel from Italy. I'm the Vice President of the Italian Union of Young Jews. And part of my family comes from Egypt. So I relate to your storytelling.  Recently, I have attended the inaugural seminar of Archon Europe. It's an organization that's fostering heritage towards Europe. And we were wondering how to share our stories. So I want to ask you, what is the best thing for you to make the story of this sort of silent exodus known in the Western society, and especially in our university. And how do you think your activism is contributing to fight antisemitism? Adiel Cohen:   I think it's as simple as just taking the leap and start telling these stories. As I said, sit with your grandparents, with your parents and just talk about it. Write down notes and turn it into a story that can be told through social media, make videos about it. You know, Egyptian jewelry, if you look into it, there's so much there. There's the Genizah, right, the Cairo Genizah – so much knowledge and Jewish history, not only from Egypt, but from the entire Middle East.  You got accounts in the Cairo Genizah about how Jews lived in Israel, in the Land of Israel, under Muslim rule; stories that are not heard. When you expose the world and people on campus to these stories, first of all, you burst the little bubble that says Jews poofed in Israel in 1948 and up until then, they didn't exist there. And second of all, you show them that Jews existed, not just in Europe, but also in other parts of the world – in Egypt, and in the Middle East as well.  Your question was, how does my activism contribute? I hope to inspire more young Jews, Gen Z, millennials, to share their stories and get connected to them and understand the importance of sharing stories because you can enjoy listening to your grandparents stories, but then do nothing about it. So I hope that my content and then my activism inspires other Jews to speak up, just like I am inspired by other creators who also tell their stories. Manya Brachear Pashman:   And I think the other aspect of his question was about fighting antisemitism, whether or not you feel that sharing these stories helps in that effort. Adiel Cohen:   Definitely. Again, when we show the world that we're not what they say about us, that we're not white colonizers, that we're actually an indigenous tribe of people that was kicked out of their homeland and spread throughout the diaspora for 2000 years, they can try to argue with that. But at the end of the day, the facts are on our side, and also the importance of a story, you can't argue with a story.  If you're telling a story from your family, from your own personal experience, the only argument I can think about to put against the story is ‘you're lying.' And ‘you're lying' is not a good argument. If they accuse you of lying when you tell your family story, they lost. Audience Member/Daniel: Hi, my name is Daniel. I'm American-Israeli and my family background is I'm half Lithuanian and half Yemenite. I just wanna say I feel very and thoroughly inspired by you, and thank you so much for coming today.  Adiel Cohen: Thank you. Daniel: As a child, I was fortunate enough to hear stories from my grandparents and my great grandfather about their lives in Yemen. Recently, I read Maimonides' letter to Yemen Adiel Cohen: Beautiful. Daniel: And I was particularly inspired by the fact that it was originally written in Arabic and it was translated into Hebrew so that it could be properly disseminated in the community. It remains my favorite primary source regarding Yemen's Jewish community. But with 3000 years of history, almost, there's plenty to choose from. So what's your favorite text or book relating to Yemen's Jewish community? Adiel Cohen:   That. Iggeret Teiman, the letter of Maimonides to the Yemenite Jewish community is a transformative letter. It came in a time that was very, very tough for the Yemenite Jewish community. It was a time of false messiahs that started popping out of nowhere in Yemen, both in the Muslim community but also in the Jewish community. And a false messiah that pops out of nowhere creates civil unrest. It sounds a little weird and otherworldly in the world that we live in now, but when someone pops out of nowhere and says, I'm the Messiah. I'm coming to save you all, and back at the time, it was revolutionary.  And there was a lot of troubles that the Jews faced at the time because of the false messiahs. The Yemeni leadership was very hostile to Jews, just like, every time there's problems in society, who gets blamed? The Jews, for different reasons, and that time was the reason that Jews were blamed. That was the reason Jews were blamed for.  And out of Egypt, Rambam comes. He did not set foot in his life in Yemen. But the head of the Yemenite Jewish community sent him a letter all the way to Egypt. He was in Egypt at the time after migrating all the way from Spain to Morocco to Egypt, asking him for help. And he sent him this letter, Rambam sent him back this letter, Iggeret Teiman, where he basically empowers and strengthens the Jewish community, telling them to maintain their faith and do not fall for the false messiahs and keep their faith in Hashem, and they will be saved.  It was as simple as that to save the Jewish community who was suffering at the time, and ever since then, Jews adopted, not fully, but adopted a lot of the Rambam's Mishnah, his ideas. And till this day, the Rambam is the most notable figure that Yemenite Jews look up to. He did not set foot in Yemen one time.  The Jews did not go to Egypt and sought for help, but it shows you why it's my favorite text in our history. It's because it shows that even in the diaspora, even when, you know, we were seemingly disconnected, we always relied on each other. And it's amazing to think about it, how a letter got to Egypt, sent back, and he saved a community from all the way far over there. So yeah, that's the answer. Manya Brachear Pashman:   So I think we are out of time. Thank you for all those thoughtful questions. That was really wonderful. And thank you for being such a lovely audience. And thank you, Adiel. Adiel Cohen: Thank you. Manya Brachear Pashman:   For joining us and sharing your family's story and hopefully inspiring some of us to do the same. So thank you. Adiel Cohen:   I hope so. Thank you so much. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Yemenite Jews are just one of the many Jewish communities who, in the last century, left Arab countries to forge new lives for themselves and future generations.  Join us next week as we share another untold story of The Forgotten Exodus. Many thanks to Adiel for sharing his story. Too many times during my reporting, I encountered children and grandchildren who didn't have the answers to my questions because they'd never asked. That's why one of the goals of this project is to encourage you to ask those questions. Find your stories. Atara Lakritz is our producer. T.K. Broderick is our sound engineer. Special thanks to Jon Schweitzer, Nicole Mazur, Sean Savage, and Madeleine Stern, and so many of our colleagues, too many to name really, for making this series possible.  You can subscribe to The Forgotten Exodus on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts, and you can learn more at AJC.org/theforgottenexodus.  The views and opinions of our guests don't necessarily reflect the positions of AJC.  You can reach us at theforgottenexodus@ajc.org. If you've enjoyed this episode, please be sure to spread the word, and hop onto Apple Podcasts or Spotify to rate us and write a review to help more listeners find us.

Daniela Russ zur Ideengeschichte des Energiebegriffs und dem Verhältnis von Natur, Energie und Arbeit. Shownotes Danielas Webseite: http://danielaruss.net/   Daniela Russ bei der Uni Leipzig: https://www.uni-leipzig.de/personenprofil/mitarbeiter/juniorprof-dr-daniela-russ   Daniela Russ auf researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniela-Russ   Daniela Russ bei twitter (X): https://x.com/ueberdruss   Russ, Daniela (2023) ‚Produktivistische Ökologie: Der Energiebegriff der klassischen Moderne und seine Implikationen für eine kritische Soziologie‘ (Berliner Journal für Soziologie Vol. 33, S 357-385): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-023-00505-0   Russ, Daniela (2022) ‚ “Socialism is not just Built for a Hundred Years”: Renewable Energy and Planetary Thought in the Early Soviet Union (1917–1945)' (Contemporary European History 31 (4), S. 491–508): https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777322000431   Russ, Daniela (2021) ‚Energetika: Gleb Krzhizhanovskii's Conception of the Nature–Society Metabolism' (Historical Materialism 29 (2), S. 188–218): https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341887   Weitere Shownotes   Thomas Lemkes relationaler Materialismus Lemke, Thomas (2021) ‘The Government of Things. Foucault and the New Materialisms': https://nyupress.org/9781479829934/the-government-of-things/   Meadows, Dennis et al. (1972) ‚Die Grenzen des Wachstums. Bericht des Club of Rome zur Lage der Menschheit‘ [engl. Original: ‚The Limits to Growth‘]: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Grenzen_des_Wachstums#1972:_Ergebnisse_der_urspr%C3%BCnglichen_Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung   Mitchell, Timothy (2009) ‘Carbon democracy' (Artikel aus Economy and Society, 38(3), 399–432): https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598   Mitchell, Timothy (2011) ‘Carbon democracy - Political Power in the Age of Oil' (Buch erschienen bei Verso): https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4422161/mod_resource/content/0/Timothy%20Mitchell-Carbon%20Democracy_%20Political%20Power%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Oil-Verso%20%282011%29.pdf [Volltext]   Alexander Bogdanow – Portrait bei jacobin: https://www.jacobin.de/artikel/alexander-bogdanow-revolutionaerer-denker-und-sci-fi-pionier   Gleb Krschischanowski (s. auch Danielas oben verlinkten Artikel): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleb_Maximilianowitsch_Krschischanowski   Gosplan, die sowjetische Plankommission: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gosplan   Artikel zur Entstehung von Gosplan unter Lenin und Krschischanowski: https://www.nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1148811.gosplan-die-notwendige-anmassung.html   Lenins Imperialismusthese Lenin, Wladimir Iljitsch (1917) ‚Der Imperialismus als höchstes Stadium des Kapitalismus. Gemeinverständlicher Abriß‘ (Volltext): https://www.marxists.org/deutsch/archiv/lenin/1917/imp/index.htm   Homepage von Bruno Latour: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/   Devine, Pat (1988) ‘Democracy and economic planning: the political economy of a self-governing society' (Routledge): https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429033117/democracy-economic-planning-pat-devine   Thematisch angrenzende Folgen   S02E36 | Thomas Lemke zum Regieren der Dinge: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e36-thomas-lemke-zum-regieren-der-dinge/   S03E08 | Simon Schaupp zu Stoffwechselpolitik: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e08-simon-schaupp-zu-stoffwechselpolitik/   S03E05 | Marina Fischer-Kowalski zu gesellschaftlichem Stoffwechsel: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e05-marina-fischer-kowalski-zu-gesellschaftlichem-stoffwechsel/   S03E14 | Walther Zeug zu Material- und Energieflussanalyse und sozio-metabolischer Planung: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e14-walther-zeug-zu-material-und-energieflussanalyse-und-sozio-metabolischer-planung/   S03E03 | Planning for Entropy on Sociometabolic Planning: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e03-planning-for-entropy-on-sociometabolic-planning/   S02E55 | Kohei Saito on Degrowth Communism: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e55-kohei-saito-on-degrowth-communism/   S02E33 | Pat Devine on Negotiated Coordination: https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e33-pat-devine-on-negotiated-coordination/   Future Histories Kontakt & Unterstützung Wenn euch Future Histories gefällt, dann erwägt doch bitte eine Unterstützung auf Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories   Schreibt mir unter office@futurehistories.today Diskutiert mit auf Twitter (#FutureHistories): https://twitter.com/FutureHpodcast auf Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/futurehistories.bsky.social auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ oder auf Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories   Webseite mit allen Folgen: www.futurehistories.today English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com/    Episode Keywords #DanielaRuss, #JanGroos, #FutureHistories, #Podcast, #HistorischeSoziologie, #KritischeTheorie, #NeuerMaterialismus, #Umweltsoziologie, #Energiesoziologie, #Energiewirtschaft, #KommodifizierungDerNatur, #Neoliberalismus, #ArbeitDerNatur, #Naturkraft, #Stromnetz, #Sozialismus, #Energieökonomie, #EnergyEconomics, #SowjetischePlanung, #Planungsdebatte, #Energieplanung, #Marxismus, #GesellschaftlicheNaturverhältnisse, #ProduktivistischeÖkologie, #ÖkologischePlanung, #Ökologisch-demokratischePlanung, #Material-UndEnergieflussanalyse, #EnergetischePlanung, #Beziehungsweisen, #RelationalerMaterialismus, #EnviromentalesRegieren, #EnvironmentalGovernance, #PatDevine, #BrunoLatour, #Ressourcen

Danielas Weg zum erfolgreichen Beckenboden-Webinar Heute tauchen wir tief ein in die Welt der Webinare. Im Interview mit Magda Bleckmann sprecht Daniela Vollenweider, Expertin für den fitten Beckenboden  über alles, von den Vor- und Nachteilen digitalen Events bis hin zu erprobten Strategien. In dieser Episode erfährst du: Die Vor- und Nachteile von Online-Veranstaltungen: Erfahrungen mit dem Programm 'Knack den Webinarcode: Daniela Vollenweider, teilt ihre persönlichen Einblicke und Erfolge, die sie durch dieses transformative Programm erzielt hat. Blick hinter die Kulissen ihres nächsten Beckenboden-Webinars Hier ist der Link zu Danielas nächstem Beckenboden Webinar: https://beckenboden-webinar.danielavollenweidertraining.ch   Wenn du bereit bist, dein eigenes Webinar auf Vordermann zu bringen oder du Hilfe beim Starten benötigst, buche jetzt deinen Kennenlern-Termin! Nutze die Gelegenheit, direkt von einer Expertin zu Feedback und erste Tipps zu erhalten. Reserviere Dir hier Deinen Termin in meinem Kalender https://tidycal.com/magdableckmann/klaerungsgesprach

Träumst du davon dein eigenes Buch zu schreiben? Träumst du davon, Menschen mit deiner Geschichte zu inspirieren? Und das mit einer Leichtigkeit und Freude? Liebste Joybomb, in dieser Episode habe ich die großartige Daniela Landgraf, Autorin und Buchcoach, bei mir zu Gast und sie verrät dir, wie du dein Buchprojekt von der Idee bis zur Veröffentlichung kreierst. Was wäre, wenn du dich mit deinem Buch der Welt zeigst und ihr erzählst was du zu sagen hast? Und was wäre, wenn du auch damit - wie immer, liebste Joybomb, Freude und Leichtigkeit haben darfst? In dieser Episode erfährst du wie du dein Buch kreierst und du bist eingeladen zur Veröffentlichung meines Buches: ✨ Wie es zu Danielas ersten Buch und darauf gleich zu mehr als 20 weiteren kam ✨ Welche Steps zu beachten sind, wenn du dein Buch schreiben möchtest ✨ Wie dir dein Buch zu deinem Business beitragen kann ✨ Du bist eingeladen am 08. März um 18:00 Uhr zu der Veröffentlichung meines ersten Buches "Herzensbotschaften". Ein Buchprojekt geleitet von Daniela, mit mir und 15 weiteren wunderbaren AutorInnen. Daniela Landgraf ist Vortragsrednerin, Moderatorin und Autorin von rund 20 veröffentlichten Büchern zu den Themen Selbstwert, mentale Stärke, tiergestütztes Coaching und Finanzen. Ihre umfangreiche Expertise teilt sie nicht nur durch ihre Publikationen, sondern auch als Buch-Coach. Sie unterstützt Autoren von der ersten Idee bis zur erfolgreichen Veröffentlichung ihres Buches. Als Literaturagentin bringt sie Autoren mit den passenden Verlagen zusammen.

Nicht explizit für alle Daniels und Danielas dieser Welt, aber schon auch ein bisschen. Das einmal mehr herrlich relaxte sechste Studioalbum von Real Estate aus New Jersey steht ganz im Zeichen von «Daniel»: Darum kürte man vor Release des Albums auch jeden Monat einen «Daniel der Woche» und an der Releaseshow letzten Freitag waren im Publikum ebenfalls nur Daniels zugelassen. Gewinnen kann das Sounds! Album der Woche aber auch, wer nicht Daniela oder Daniel heisst, versprochen! CDs gibt's diese Woche jeden Abend live in der Sendung. Plus: ein musikalischer Berlinale -Recap und das Kick-Off zu unserer 90er-Woche. Bis und mit Donnerstag gibt's im Sounds! jeden Abend ab 22 Uhr einen 90er-Klassiker ausgespielt. Heute: «Homework» von Daft Punk.

Über Freunde kommt Daniela als Teenager in eine Freikirche. Ihre Eltern haben keinen Einfluss mehr auf die Werte und Überzeugungen, die von nun an alle Bereiche ihres Lebens bestimmen. Der Druck war immens, als Daniela anfing, die Lehren ihrer Gemeinde zu hinterfragen. Gemeinsam mit ihrem Partner schafft sie einen Neuanfang. Doch wie entlernt man jahrelange Indoktrination über den eigenen Körper, die eigene Sexualität und Partnerschaft? Wie wichtig Konsens nicht nur vor, sondern auch in der Ehe und allgemein Beziehungen ist, erfahrt ihr in dieser Folge. Mehr von Mona (@kopfvollbunt) und Daniela (@danielamarlinjakobi) findest du auf Instagram und TikTok!

Unser heutiger Gast ist Daniela Oemus. Daniela ist Trailläuferin und hat dieses Jahr mit dem Sieg bei Zegama im Rahmen der Golden World Trail Series ihren größten Erfolg eingefahren. Doch Daniela ist keine Neue in der Szene - so siegte sie bereits zweimal mit Streckenrekord beim altehrwürdigen Rennsteig Supermarathon und konnte auch bei anderen Rennen wie dem Marathon du Mont Blanc aufhorchen lassen. Im heutigen Gespräch soll es allerdings nicht nur um Danielas sportliche Höhepunkte gehen, wir haben mit ihr auch darüber gesprochen, wie sich Sport auf diesem Niveau mit dem Leben vereinbaren lässt. Denn immerhin ist Daniela Mutter zweier kleiner Kinder und arbeitet zudem als Ärztin im Krankenhaus. 

Suchst du nach Magie, um dein Active Sourcing zu verbessern?Daniela zeigt dir, was echte Magie ist: nicht Zaubersprüche, sondern praktische Tipps und das Wissen, die sie jahrelang gesammelt hat.Im Gespräch navigieren Host Martin und Daniela sich durch grundlegende Themen: von der richtigen Suche – Martin greift nebenbei noch ein paar Tipps für seine eigene offene Stelle im Marketing ab und erkundet mit Daniela die richtigen Keywords über die Enthüllung, dass Daniela kein Jobangebot bei der Erstnachricht mitschickt bis zum nahtlosen Übergang von Sourcing-Nachricht zum ersten GesprächDie Gretchen-Frage – Welche Sourcing-Kanäle sind deine Favoriten? – bleibt natürlich nicht unerforscht.Lass dich von Danielas Begeisterung fürs Recruiting anstecken: 00:00 – 03:20 Daniela teilt ihre Leidenschaft für Recruiting, gesammelt in Büchern, E-Books und live auf der Bühne. 03:20 – 05:55 Master Sourcerin wird Daniela durch 4h Prüfung. 05:55 – 09:21 Bewährte Methoden im Active Sourcing. 09:21 – 10:13 LinkedIn-InMail Öffnungsrate von 87,4%. 10:13 – 11:56 Die magische Formel für Betreffzeilen mit zwei praxisnahen Beispielen. 11:56 – 13:35 Authentisch geht es weiter. 13:35 – 18:44 Workwise sucht eine:n CMO – Keywords effektiv einsetzen. 18:44 – 20:25 Boolesche Suche: einfache Hacks und Tricks. 20:25 – 21:59 Es gibt nicht die Eine. Die Suche, die rundum glücklich macht und perfekte Kandidat:innen ausspuckt. 21:59 – 25:16 Entspannt bleiben: persönliche Nähe durch Copywriting. 25:16 – 28:15 AIDA-Formel, DISC-Modell: die Motoren hinter den Zaubertricks von Daniela. 28:15 – 29:55 Der Call-To-Action am Ende der Erstnachricht. 29:55 – 31:14 Eine Yes-Bridge bauen. Recruiting ist auch Vertrieb. 31:14 – 33:12 Daniela's bevorzugte Active-Sourcing-Kanäle: LinkedIn und XING. 33:12 – 34:04 X-Ray Search in Google – Doppelt hält besser. 34:04 – 39:12 Der Mix macht es im Active Sourcing: Bundesagentur für Arbeit und das Problem mit Lebenslaufdatenbanken. 39:12 – Danielas abschließende Tipps für möglichst viele Interviews.Du hast noch nicht genug von Active Sourcing?Wir auch nicht: Von A wie Active Sourcing bis Z wie Zusage Perfect Match? Wer passende Bewerber:innen will, muss suchen. LinkedIn Recruiter: Tool-Vorstellung und Tipps Success Story: Mit Active Sourcing vernetzt Netzlink die ArbeitsweltJetzt haben Martin und Daniela doch nicht über ChatGPT gesprochen! Mist. Besser hier entlang: Coole Hacks für heiße Tage 2: ChatGPT-Prompts fürs RecruitingMit Workwise Mitarbeiter:innen finden: hire.workwise.io

Listen on: * Spotify* Apple Podcasts* Google PodcastsNote: the core discussion on ethics begins at 7:58 and moves into philosophy of language at ~1:12:19Daniel's stuff:* AI X-risk podcast * The Filan Cabined podcast* Personal website and blogBlurb and bulleted summary from ClongThis wide-ranging conversation between Daniel and Aaron touches on movies, business drama, philosophy of language, ethics and legal theory. The two debate major ethical concepts like utilitarianism and moral realism. Thought experiments around rational beings choosing to undergo suffering feature prominently. meandering tangents explore the semantics of names and references.* Aaron asserts that total utilitarianism does not imply that any amount of suffering can be morally justified by creating more happiness. His argument is that the affirmative case for this offsetting ability has not been clearly made.* He proposes a thought experiment - if offered to experience the suffering of all factory farmed animals in exchange for unlimited happiness, even a perfectly rational being would refuse. This indicates there are some levels of suffering not offsettable.* Aaron links this to experiences like hunger where you realize suffering can be worse than you appreciate normally. This causes his intuition some suffering can't be outweighed.* Daniel disagrees, believing with the right probabilities and magnitudes of suffering versus happiness, rational beings would take that gamble.* For example, Daniel thinks the atomic bombing of Japan could be offset by reducing more suffering. Aaron is less sure given the pain inflicted.* Daniel also proposes offsets for animal farming, but Aaron doesn't think factory farming harm is offsettable by any amount of enjoyment of meat.* They discuss definitions of rationality and whether evolution pressures against suicide impact the rationality of not killing oneself.* Aaron ties his argument to siding with what a perfectly rational being would choose to experience, not necessarily what they would prefer.* They debate whether hypothetical aliens pursuing "schmorality" could point to a concept truly analogous to human morality. Aaron believes not.Transcript(Very imperfect)AARONO'how's, it going it's going all right.DANIELYeah, I just so yesterday I saw Barbie and today I saw Oppenheimer, so it's good to oh, cool. That cultural.AARONNice, nice.DANIELDo you have takes? Yeah, I thought it was all right. It was a decent view of Oppenheimer as a person. It was like a how? I don't know. I feel like the public can tend to be taken in by this physicist figures you get this with quotes, right? Like, the guy was just very good at having fun with journalists, and now we get these amazing nuggets of wisdom from Einstein. I don't know. I think that guy was just having good I don't know. The thing that I'm coming away from is I thought I only watched Barbie because it was coming out on the same day as Oppenheimer, right? Like, otherwise it wouldn't have occurred to me to watch it. I was like, yeah, whatever. Barbie is, like, along for the ride, and Oppenheimer is going to be amazing, but in like, maybe Oppenheimer was a bit better than Barbie, but I'm not even sure of that, actually.AARONYeah, I've been seeing people say that on Twitter. I haven't seen either, but I've been seeing several people say that I'm following, say, like, Barbie was exceptional. And also that kind of makes sense because I'm following all these EA people who are probably care more about the subject matter for the latter one. So it's like, I kind of believe that Barbie is, like, aesthetically better or something. That's my take. Right.DANIELGuess. Well, if you haven't seen them, I guess I don't want to spoil them for you. They're trying to do different things aesthetically. Right. Like, I'm not quite sure I'd want to say one is aesthetically better. Probably in some ways, I think Barbie probably has more aesthetic blunders than Oppenheimer does. Okay. But yeah, I don't know if you haven't seen it, I feel like I don't want to spoil it for you.AARONOkay. No, that's fine. This isn't supposed to be like probably isn't the most important the most interesting thing we could be talking about is that the bar?DANIELOh, jeez.AARONOh, no, that's a terrible bar. That was like an overstatement. That would be a very high bar. It would also be, like, kind of paralyzing. I don't know. Actually know what that would be, honestly. Probably some social juicy gossip thing. Not that we necessarily have any.DANIELYeah, I think your interestingness. Yeah, I think I don't have the know, the closest to gossip thing I saw was like, do you see this bit of Carolyn Elson's diaries and letters to SBF that was leaked to the.AARONNo, I don't. Was this like today or recently? How recently?DANIELThis was like a few days ago.AARONI've been seeing her face on Twitter, but I don't actually think I know anything about this. And no, I would not have.DANIELBackground of who she is and stuff.AARONYeah, hold on. Let the audience know that I am on a beach family vacation against my will. Just kidding. Not against my will. And I have to text my sister back. Okay, there we go. I mean, I broadly know the FTX story. I know that she was wait, I'm like literally blanking on the Alameda.DANIELThat's the name of research.AARONOkay. Yeah. So she was CEO, right? Yeah. Or like some sort of like I think I know the basics.DANIELThe like, she was one of the OG Stanford EA people and was around.AARONYeah, that's like a generation. Not an actual generation, like an EA generation. Which is what, like six years or.DANIELLike the I don't know, I've noticed like, in the there's like I feel like there's this gap between pre COVID people and post COVID people. No one left their house. Partly people moved away, but also you were inside for a while and never saw anyone in person. So it felt like, oh, there's like this crop of new people or something. Whereas in previous years, there'd be some number of new people per year and they'd get gradually integrated in. Anyway, all that is to say that, I don't know, I think SBF's side of the legal battle leaked some documents to The New York Times, which were honestly just like her saying, like, oh, I feel very stressed and I don't like my job, and I'm sort of glad that the thing is blown up now. I don't know. It honestly wasn't that salacious. But I think that's, like, the way I get in the loop on gossip like some of the New York Times.AARONAnd I eventually I love how it's funny that this particular piece of gossip is, like, running through the most famous and prestigious news organization in the world. Or, like, one of them or something. Yeah. Instead of just being like, oh, yeah, these two people are dating, or whatever. Anyway, okay, I will maybe check that out.DANIELYeah, I mean, honestly, it's not even that interesting.AARONThe whole thing is pretty I am pretty. This is maybe bad, but I can't wait to watch the Michael Lewis documentary, pseudo documentary or whatever.DANIELYeah, it'll be good to read the book. Yeah, it's very surreal. I don't know. I was watching Oppenheimer. Right. And I have to admit, part of what I'm thinking is be if humanity survives, there's going to be this style movie about open AI, presumably, right? And I'm like, oh, man, it'll be amazing to see my friend group depicted on film. But that is going to happen. It's just going to be about FTX and about how they're all criminals. So that's not great.AARONYeah, actually, everybody dunks on crypto now, and it's like low status now or whatever. I still think it's really cool. I never had more than maybe $2,000 or whatever, which is not a trivial I mean, it's not a large amount of my money either, but it's not like, nothing. But I don't know, if it wasn't for all the cultural baggage, I feel like I would be a crypto bro or I would be predisposed to being a crypto bro or something.DANIELYeah. I should say I was like joking about the greedy crypto people who want their money to not be stolen. I currently have a Monero sticker on the back of my a big I don't know, I'm a fan of the crypto space. It seems cool. Yeah. I guess especially the bit that is less about running weird scams. The bit that's running weird scams I'm less of a fan of.AARONYeah. Yes. I'm also anti scam. Right, thank you. Okay, so I think that thing that we were talking about last time we talked, which is like the thing I think we actually both know stuff about instead of just like, repeating New York Times articles is my nuanced ethics takes and why you think about talk about that and then we can just also branch off from there.DANIELYeah, we can talk about that.AARONMaybe see where that did. I luckily I have a split screen up, so I can pull up things. Maybe this is kind of like egotistical or something to center my particular view, but you've definitely given me some of the better pushback or whatever that I haven't gotten that much feedback of any kind, I guess, but it's still interesting to hear your take. So basically my ethical position or the thing that I think is true is that which I think is not the default view. I think most people think this is wrong is that total utilitarianism does not imply that for some amount of suffering that could be created there exists some other extremely large arbitrarily, large amount of happiness that could also be created which would morally justify the former. Basically.DANIELSo you think that even under total utilitarianism there can be big amounts of suffering such that there's no way to morally tip the calculus. However much pleasure you can create, it's just not going to outweigh the fact that you inflicted that much suffering on some people.AARONYeah, and I'd highlight the word inflicted if something's already there and you can't do anything about it, that's kind of neither here nor there as it pertains to your actions or something. So it's really about you increasing, you creating suffering that wouldn't have otherwise been created. Yeah. It's also been a couple of months since I've thought about this in extreme detail, although I thought about it quite a bit. Yeah.DANIELMaybe I should say my contrary view, I guess, when you say that, I don't know, does total utilitarianism imply something or not? I'm like, well, presumably it depends on what we mean by total utilitarianism. Right. So setting that aside, I think that thesis is probably false. I think that yeah. You can offset great amounts of suffering with great amounts of pleasure, even for arbitrary amounts of suffering.AARONOkay. I do think that position is like the much more common and even, I'd say default view. Do you agree with that? It's sort of like the implicit position of people who are of self described total utilitarians who haven't thought a ton about this particular question.DANIELYeah, I think it's probably the implicit default. I think it's the implicit default in ethical theory or something. I think that in practice, when you're being a utilitarian, I don't know, normally, if you're trying to be a utilitarian and you see yourself inflicting a large amount of suffering, I don't know. I do think there's some instinct to be like, is there any way we can get around this?AARONYeah, for sure. And to be clear, I don't think this would look like a thought experiment. I think what it looks like in practice and also I will throw in caveats as I see necessary, but I think what it looks like in practice is like, spreading either wild animals or humans or even sentient digital life through the universe. That's in a non as risky way, but that's still just maybe like, say, making the earth, making multiple copies of humanity or something like that. That would be an example that's probably not like an example of what an example of creating suffering would be. For example, just creating another duplicate of earth. Okay.DANIELAnything that would be like so much suffering that we shouldn't even the pleasures of earth outweighs.AARONNot necessarily, which is kind of a cop out. But my inclination is that if you include wild animals, the answer is yes, that creating another earth especially. Yeah, but I'm much more committed to some amount. It's like some amount than this particular time and place in human industry is like that or whatever.DANIELOkay, can I get a feel of some other concrete cases to see?AARONYeah.DANIELSo one example that's on my mind is, like, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, right? So the standard case for this is, like, yeah, what? A hundred OD thousand people died? Like, quite terrible, quite awful. And a lot of them died, I guess a lot of them were sort of some people were sort of instantly vaporized, but a lot of people died in extremely painful ways. But the countercase is like, well, the alternative to that would have been like, an incredibly grueling land invasion of Japan, where many more people would have died or know regardless of what the actual alternatives were. If you think about the atomic bombings, do you think that's like the kind of infliction of suffering where there's just not an offsetting amount of pleasure that could make that okay?AARONMy intuition is no, that it is offsettable, but I would also emphasize that given the actual historical contingencies, the alternative, the implicit case for the bombing includes reducing suffering elsewhere rather than merely creating happiness. There can definitely be two bad choices that you have to make or something. And my claim doesn't really pertain to that, at least not directly.DANIELRight. Sorry. But when you said you thought your answer was no, you think you can't offset that with pleasure?AARONMy intuition is that you can, but I know very little about how painful those deaths were and how long they lasted.DANIELYeah, so the non offset so it's like, further out than atomic bombing.AARONThat's my guess, but I'm like.DANIELOkay, sure, that's your guess. You're not super confident. That's fine. I guess another thing would be, like, the animal farming system. So, as you're aware, tons of animals get kept in farms for humans to eat, by many count. Many of them live extremely horrible lives. Is there some amount that humans could enjoy meat such that that would be okay?AARONNo. So the only reason I'm hesitating is because, like, the question is, like, what the actual alternative is here, but, like, if it's like, if it's, like, people enjoy, like, a meat a normal amount and there's no basically the answer is no. Although, like, what I would actually endorse doing depends on what the alternative is.DANIELOkay, but you think that factory farming is so bad that it's not offsettable by pleasure.AARONYeah, that's right. I'm somewhat maybe more confident than the atomic bombing case, but again, I don't know what it's like to be a factory farm pig. I wouldn't say I'm, like, 99% sure. Probably more than 70% or something. Or 70%, like, conditional on me being right about this thesis, I guess something like that, which I'm like. Yeah, okay. I don't know. Some percent, maybe, not probably not 99% sure, but also more than 60. Probably more than 70% sure or something.DANIELAll right. Yeah. So I guess maybe can you tell us a little bit about why you would believe that there's some threshold that you like where you can no longer compensate by permitting pleasure?AARONYes. Let me run through my argument and sort of a motivation, and the motivation actually is sort of more a direct answer to what you just said. So the actual argument that I have and I have a blog post about this that I'll link, it was part of an EA forum post also that you'll also link in the show description is that the affirmative default case doesn't seem to actually be made anywhere. That's not the complete argument, but it's a core piece of it, which is that it seems to be, like, the default received view, which doesn't mean it's wrong, but does mean that we should be skeptical. If you accept that I'm right, that the affirmative case hasn't been made, we can talk about that. Then you should default to some other heuristic. And the heuristic that I assert and sort of argue, but kind of just assert is a good heuristic is. Okay. Is you do the following thought experiment. If I was a maximally or perfectly rational being, would I personally choose to undergo this amount of suffering in compensation or not compensation, exchange for later undergoing or earlier undergoing some arbitrarily large amount of happiness. And I personally have the intuition that there are events or things that certainly conceivable states and almost certainly possible states that I could be in such that even as a rational being, like as a maximum rational being, I would choose to just disappear and not exist rather than undergo both of these things.DANIELOkay.AARONYeah.DANIELWhy do you think that?AARONYeah, so good question. I think the answer comes at a couple of different levels. So there's a question of why I'm saying it and why I'm saying it is because I'm pretty sure this is the answer I would actually give if actually given if Credibly offered this option. But that just pushes the question back. Okay, why do I feel that.DANIELEven what option are we talking about here? There exists a thing such that for.AARONAll pleasures, basically, for example, let's just run with the fact, the assumption that a genie God descends. And I think it's credible, and he offers that I can live the life of every factory, farmed animal in exchange for whatever I want for any amount of time or something like that. Literally, I don't have to give the answer now. It can just be like an arbitrarily good state for an arbitrarily long period of time.DANIELOh, yeah.AARONAnd not only would I say the words no, I don't want to do that, I think that the words no, I don't want to do that, are selfishly in a non pejorative sense. Correct. And then there's a question of why do I have that intuition? And now I'm introspecting, which is maybe not super reliable. I think part of my intuition that I can kind of maybe sort of access via introspection just comes from basically, I'm very fortunate to not have had a mostly relatively comfortable life, like as a Westerner with access to painkillers, living in the 21st century. Even still, there have definitely been times when I've been suffered, at least not in a relative sense, but just like, in an absolute sense to me, in a pretty bad way. And one example I can give was just like, I was on a backpacking trip, and this is the example I give in another blog post I can link. I was on a backpacking trip, and we didn't have enough food, and I was basically very hungry for like five days. And I actually think that this is a good and I'm rambling on, but I'll finish up. I think it's illustrative. I think there's some level of suffering where you're still able to do at least for me, I'm still able to do something like reasoning and intentionally storing memories. One of the memories I tried to intentionally codify via language or something was like, yeah, this is really bad, this really sucks, or something like, that what.DANIELSucked about it, you were just like, really hungry yeah.AARONFor five days.DANIELOkay. And you codified the thought, like, feeling of this hunger I'm feeling, this really sucks.AARONSomething like that. Right. I could probably explicate it more, but that's basically okay. Actually, hold on. All right. Let me add so not just it really sucks, but it sucks in a way that I can't normally appreciate, so I don't normally have access to how bad it sucks. I don't want to forget about this later or something.DANIELYeah. The fact that there are pains that are really bad where you don't normally appreciate how bad they are, it's not clear how that implies non offset ability.AARONRight, I agree. It doesn't.DANIELOkay.AARONI do think that's causally responsible for my intuition that I lend link to a heuristic that I then argue does constitute an argument in the absence of other arguments for offset ability.DANIELYeah. Okay. So that causes this intuition, and then you give some arguments, and the argument is like, you think that if a genie offered you to live liable factory farmed animals in exchange for whatever you wanted, you wouldn't go for that.AARONYes. And furthermore, I also wouldn't go for it if I was much more rational.DANIELIf you were rational, yeah. Okay. Yeah. What do I think about this? One thing I think is that the I think the case of live experience this suffering and then experience this pleasure, to me, I think that this is kind of the wrong way to go about this. Because the thing about experiencing suffering is that it's not just we don't live in this totally dualistic world where suffering just affects only your immaterial mind or something in a way where afterwards you could just be the same. In the real world, suffering actually affects you. Right. Perhaps indelibly. I think instead, maybe the thing I'd want to say is suppose you're offered a gamble, right, where there's like a 1% chance that you're going to have to undergo excruciating suffering and a 99% chance that you get extremely awesome pleasures or something.AARONYeah.DANIELAnd this is meant to model a situation in which you do some action in which one person is going to undergo really bad suffering and 99 other people are going to undergo really great pleasure. And to me, I guess my intuition is that for any bad thing, you could make the probability small enough and you can make the rest of the probability mass good enough that I want to do that. I feel like that's worth it for me. And now it feels a little bit unsatisfying that we're just going that we're both drilling down to, like, well, this is the choice I would make, and then maybe you can disagree that it's the choice you would make. But yeah, I guess about the gambling case, what do you think about that? Let's say it's literally a one in a million chance that you would have to undergo, let's say, the life of one factory farmed animal.AARONYeah.DANIELOr is that not enough? Do you want it to be like, more?AARONWell, I guess it would have to be like one of the worst factory farmed animals. Life, I think would make that like.DANIELYeah, okay, let's say it's like, maybe literally one in a billion chance.AARONFirst of all, I do agree that these are basically isomorphic or morally equivalent, or if anything, time ordering in my example does mess things up a little bit, I'll be happy to reverse them or say that instead compare one person to 1000 people. So, yeah, you can make the probability small enough that my intuition changes. Yeah. So in fact, 1%, I'm very like, no, definitely not doing that. One in a million. I'm like, I don't know, kind of 50 50. I don't have a strong intuition either way. 100 trillion. I have the intuition. You know what? That's just not going to happen. That's my first order intuition. I do think that considering the case where you live, one being lives both lives, or you have, say, one being undergoing the suffering and then like 100 trillion undergoing the pleasure makes small probabilities more if you agree that they're sort of isomorphic makes them more complete or something like that, or complete more real in some. Not tangible is not the right word, but more right.DANIELYou're less tempted to round it to zero.AARONYeah. And so I tend to think that I trust my intuitions more about reasoning. Okay, there's one person undergoing suffering and like 100 trillion undergoing happiness as it pertains to the question of offset ability more than I trust my intuitions about small probabilities.DANIELI guess that's strange because that strikes me as strange because I feel like you're regularly in situations where you make choices that have some probability of causing you quite bad suffering, but a large probability of being fun. Like going to the beach. There could be a shark there. I guess this is maybe against your will, but you can go to a restaurant, maybe get food poisoning, but how often are you like, oh man, if I flip this switch, one person will be poisoned, but 99 people will?AARONWell, then you'd have to think that, okay, staying home would actually be safer for some reason, which I don't affirmatively think is true, but this actually does work out for the question of whether you should kill yourself. And there hopefully this doesn't get censored by Apple or whatever, so nobody do that. But there I just think that my lizard brain or there's enough evolutionary pressure to not trust that I would be rational when it comes to the question of whether to avoid a small chance of suffering by unaliving myself, as they say on TikTok.DANIELHang on, evolution is pressured. So there's some evolutionary pressure to make sure you really don't want to kill yourself, but you think that's like, irrational.AARONI haven't actually given this a ton of thought. It gets hard when you loop in altruism and yeah, the question also there's like some chance that of sentient's after death, there's not literally zero or something like that. Yeah, I guess those are kind of cop outs. So I don't know, I feel like it certainly could be. And I agree this is sort of like a strike against my argument or something. I can set up a situation you have no potential to improve the lives of others, and you can be absolutely sure that you're not going to experience any sentience after death. And then I feel like my argument does kind of imply that, yeah, that's like the rational thing to do. I wouldn't do it. Right. So I agree. This is like a strike against me.DANIELYeah. I guess I just want to make two points. So the first point I want to make is just methodologically. If we're talking about which are you likely to be more rational about gambles of small risks, small probabilities of risk versus large rewards as opposed to situations where you can do a thing that affects a large number of people one way and a small number of people another way? I think the gambles are more like decisions that you make a bunch and you should be rational about and then just the second thing in terms of like, I don't know, I took you to be making some sort of argument along the lines of there's evolutionary pressure to want to not kill yourself. Therefore, that's like a debunking explanation. The fact that there was evolutionary pressure to not kill ourselves means that our instinct that we shouldn't kill ourselves is irrational. Whereas I would tend to look at it and say the fact that there was very strong evolutionary pressure to not kill ourselves is an explanation of why I don't want to kill myself. And I see that as affirming the choice to not kill myself, actually.AARONWell, I just want to say I don't think it's an affirmative argument that it is irrational. I think it opens up the question. I think it means it's more plausible that for other I guess not even necessarily for other reasons, but it just makes it more plausible that it is irrational. Well.DANIELYeah, I take exactly the opposite view. Okay. I think that if I'm thinking about, like, oh, what do I really want? If I consider my true preferences, do I really want to kill myself or something? And then I learn that, oh, evolution has shaped me to not kill myself, I think the inference I should make is like, oh, I guess probably the way evolution did that is that it made it such that my true desires are to not kill myself.AARONYeah. So one thing is I just don't think preferences have any intrinsic value. So I don't know, we might just like I guess I should ask, do you agree with that or disagree with.DANIELThat do I think preferences have intrinsic value? No, but so no, but I think like, the whole game here is like, what do I prefer? Or like, what would I prefer if I understood things really clearly?AARONYes. And this is something I didn't really highlight or maybe I didn't say it at all, is that I forget if I really argue it or kind of just assert it, but I at least assert that the answer to hedonic utilitarian. What you should do under hedonic utilitarianism is maybe not identical to, but exactly the same as what a rational agent would do or what a rational agent would prefer if they were to experience everything that this agent would cause. Or something like that. And so these should give you the exact same answers is something I believe sure. Because I do think preferences are like we're built to understand or sort of intuit and reason about our own preferences.DANIELKind of, yeah. But broadly, I guess the point I'm making at a high level is just like if we're talking about what's ethical or what's good or whatever, I take this to ultimately be a question about what should I understand myself as preferring? Or to the extent that it's not a question of that, then it's like, I don't know, then I'm a bit less interested in the exercise.AARONYeah. It's not ideal that I appeal to this fake and that fake ideally rational being or something. But here's a reason you might think it's more worth thinking about this. Maybe you've heard about I think Tomasic makes an argument about yeah. At least in principle, you can have a pig that's in extreme pain but really doesn't want to be killed still or doesn't want to be taken out of its suffering or whatever, true ultimate preference or whatever. And so at least I think this is pretty convincing evidence that you can have where that's just like, wrong about what would be good for it, you know what I mean?DANIELYeah, sorry, I'm not talking about preference versus hedonic utilitarianism or anything. I'm talking about what do I want or what do I want for living things or something. That's what I'm talking about.AARONYeah. That language elicits preferences to me and I guess the analogous but the idea.DANIELIs that the answer to what I want for living things could be like hedonic utilitarianism, if you see what I mean.AARONOr it could be by that do you mean what hedonic utilitarianism prescribes?DANIELYeah, it could be that what I want is that just whatever maximizes beings pleasure no matter what they want.AARONYeah. Okay. Yeah, so I agree with that.DANIELYeah. So anyway, heading back just to the suicide case right. If I learn that evolution has shaped me to not want to kill myself, then that makes me think that I'm being rational in my choice to not kill myself.AARONWhy?DANIELBecause being rational is something like optimally achieving your goals. And I'm a little bit like I sort of roughly know the results of killing myself, right? There might be some question about like, but what are my goals? And if I learned that evolution has shaped my goals such that I would hate killing myself right, then I'm like, oh, I guess killing myself probably ranks really low on the list of states ordered by how much I like them.AARONYeah, I guess then it seems like you have two mutually incompatible goals. Like, one is staying alive and one is hedonic utilitarianism and then you have to choose which of these predominates or whatever.DANIELYeah, well, I think that to the extent that evolution is shaping me to not want to commit suicide, it looks like the not killing myself one is winning. I think it's evidence. I don't think it's conclusive. Right. Because there could be multiple things going on. But I take evolutionary explanations for why somebody would want X. I think that's evidence that they are rational in pursuing X rather than evidence that they are irrational in pursuing X.AARONSometimes that's true, but not always. Yeah, there's a lot in general it is. Yeah. But I feel like moral anti realistic, we can also get into that. Are going to not think this is like woo or Joe Carl Smith says when he's like making fun of moralists I don't know, in a tongue in cheek way. In one of his posts arguing for explicating his stance on antirealism basically says moral realists want to say that evolution is not sensitive to moral reasons and therefore evolutionary arguments. Actually, I don't want to quote him from memory. I'll just assert that evolution is sensitive to a lot of things, but one of them is not moral reasons and therefore evolutionary arguments are not a good evidence or are not good evidence when it comes to purely, maybe not even purely, but philosophical claims or object level moral claims, I guess, yeah, they can be evidenced by something, but not that.DANIELYeah, I think that's wrong because I think that evolution why do I think it's wrong? I think it's wrong because what are we talking about when we talk about morality? We're talking about some logical object that's like the completion of a bunch of intuitions we have. Right. And those I haven't thought about intuitions are the product of evolution. The reason we care about morality at all is because of evolution under the standard theory that evolution is the reason our brains are the way they are.AARONYeah, I think this is a very strange coincidence and I am kind of weirded out by this, but yes, I.DANIELDon'T think it's a coincidence or like not a coincidence.AARONSo it's not a coincidence like conditional honor, evolutionary history. It is like no extremely lucky or something that we like, of course we'd find it earthlings wound up with morality and stuff. Well, of course you would.DANIELWait. Have you read the metafic sequence by Elizar? Yudkowski.AARONI don't think so. And I respect Elias a ton, except I think he's really wrong about ethics and meta ethics in a lot of like I don't even know if I but I have not, so I'm not really giving them full time.DANIELOkay. I don't know. I basically take this from my understanding of the meta ethics sequence, which I recommend people read, but I don't think it's a coincidence. I don't think we got lucky. I think it's a coincidence. There are some species that get evolved, right, and they end up caring about schmorality, right?AARONYeah.DANIELAnd there are some species that get evolved, right? And they end up caring about the prime numbers or whatever, and we evolved and we ended up caring about morality. And it's not like a total so, okay, partly I'm just like, yeah, each one of them is really glad they didn't turn out to be the other things. The ones that care about two of.AARONThem are wrong, but two of them are wrong.DANIELWell, they're morally wrong. Two of them do morally wrong things all the time. Right?AARONI want to say that I hate when people say that. Sorry. So what I am saying is that you can call those by different names, but if I'm understanding this argument right, they all think that they're getting at the same core concept, which is like, no, what should we do in some okay, so does schmorality have any sort of normativity?DANIELNo, it has schmormativity.AARONOkay, well, I don't know what schmormativity is.DANIELYou know how normativity I feel like that's good. Schmormativity is about promoting the schmud.AARONOkay, so it sounds like that's just normativity, except it's normativity about different propositions. That's what it sounds like.DANIELWell, basically, I don't know, instead of these schmalians wait, no, they're aliens. They're not shmalians. They're aliens. They just do a bunch of schmud things, right? They engage in projects, they try and figure out what the schmud is. They pursue a schmud and then they look at humans, they're like, oh, these humans are doing morally good things. That's horrible. I'm so glad that we pursue the schmood instead.AARONYeah, I don't know if it's incoherent. I don't think they're being incoherent. Your description of a hypothetical let's just take for granted whatever in the thought experiment is in fact happening. I think your description is not correct. And the reason it's not correct is because there is like, what's a good analogy? So when it comes to abstract concepts in general, it is very possible for okay, I feel like it's hard to explain directly, but here an analogy, is you can have two different people who have very different conceptions of justice, but fundamentally are earnestly trying to get at the same thing. Maybe justice isn't well defined or isn't like, actually, I should probably have come up with a good example here. But you know what? I'm happy to change the word for what I use as morality or whatever, but it has the same core meaning, which is like, okay, really, what should you do at the end of the day?DANIELYeah.AARONWhat should you do?DANIELWhereas they care about morality, which is what they should do, which is a different thing. They have strong desires to do what they should do.AARONI don't think it is coherent to say that there are multiple meanings of the word should or multiple kinds. Yeah.DANIELNo, there aren't.AARONSorry. There aren't multiple meanings of the word should. Fine.DANIELThere's just a different word, which is schmood, which means something different, and that's what their desires are pegged to.AARONI don't think it's coherent, given what you've already the entire picture, I think, is incoherent. Given everything else besides the word schmoud, it is incoherent to assert that there is something broadly not analogous, like maybe isomorphic to normativity or, like, the word should. Yeah. There is only what's yeah. I feel like I'm not gonna I'm not gonna be able to verbalize it super well. I do. Yeah. Can you take something can you pick.DANIELA sentence that I said that was wrong or that was incoherent?AARONWell, it's all wrong because these aliens don't exist.DANIELThe aliens existed.AARONOkay, well, then we're debating, like, I actually don't know. It depends. You're asserting something about their culture and psychology, and then the question is, like, are you right or wrong about that? If we just take for granted that you're right, then you're right. All right. I'm saying no, you can't be sure. So conditional on being right, you're right. Then there's a question of, like, okay, what is the probability? So, like, conditional on aliens with something broad, are you willing to accept this phrase, like, something broadly analogous to morality? Is that okay?DANIELYeah, sure.AARONOkay. So if we accept that there's aliens with something broadly analogous to morality, then you want to say that they can have not only a different word, but truly a pointer to a different concept. And I think that's false.DANIELSo you think that in conceptual space, there's morality and that there's, like, nothing near it for miles.AARONThe study, like yeah, basically. At least when we're talking about, like, the like, at the at the pre conclusion stage. So, like, before you get to the point where you're like, oh, yeah, I'm certain that, like, the answer is just that we need, like, we need to make as many tennis balls as possible or whatever the general thing of, like, okay, broadly, what is the right thing to do? What should I do? Would it be good for me to do this cluster of things yeah. Is, like, miles from everything else.DANIELOkay. I think there's something true to that. I think I agree with that in some ways and on others, my other response is I think it's not a total coincidence that humans ended up caring about morality. I think if you look at these evolutionary arguments for why humans would be motivated to pursue morality. They rely on very high level facts. Like, there are a bunch of humans around. There's not one human who's, like, a billion times more powerful than everyone else. We have language. We talk through things. We reason. We need to make decisions. We need to cooperate in certain ways to produce stuff. And it's not about the fact that we're bipedal or something. So in that sense, I think it's not a total coincidence that we ended up caring about morality. And so in some sense, I think because that's true, you could maybe say you couldn't slightly tweak our species that it cared about something other than morality, which is kind of like saying that there's nothing that close to morality in concept space.AARONBut I think I misspoke earlier what I should have said is that it's very weird that we care about that most people at least partially care about suffering and happiness. I think that's just a true statement. Sorry, that is the weird thing. Why is it weird? The weird thing is that it happens to be correct, even though I only.DANIELHave what do you mean it's correct?AARONNow we have to get okay, so this is going into moral realism. I think moral realism is true, at least.DANIELSorry, what do you mean by moral realism? Wait, different by moral realism?AARONYes. So I actually have sort of a weak version of moral realism, which is, like, not that normative statements are true, but that there is, like, an objective. So if you can rank hypothetical states of the world in an ordinal way such that one is objectively better than another.DANIELYes. Okay. I agree with that, by the way. I think that's true. Okay.AARONIt sounds like you're a moral realist.DANIELYeah, I am.AARONOkay. Oh, really? Okay. I don't know. I thought you weren't. Okay, cool.DANIELLots of people in my reference class aren't. I think most Bay Area rationalists are not moral realists, but I am.AARONOkay. Maybe I was confused. Okay, that's weird. Okay. Sorry about that. Wait, so what do I mean by it happens to be true? It's like it happens to coincide with yeah, sorry, go ahead.DANIELYou said it happens to be correct that we care about morality or that we care about suffering and pleasure and something and stuff.AARONMaybe that wasn't the ideal terminology it happens to so, like, it's not morally correct? The caring about it isn't the morally correct thing. It seems sort of like the caring is instrumentally useful in promoting what happens to be legitimately good or something. Or, like legitimately good or something like that.DANIELBut but I think, like so the aliens could say a similar thing, right? They could say, like, oh, hey, we've noticed that we all care about schmurality. We all really care about promoting Schmeasure and avoiding Schmuffering. Right? And they'd say, like, they'd say, like, yeah, what's? What's wrong?AARONI feel like it's not maybe I'm just missing something, but at least to me, it's like, only adding to the confusion to talk about two different concepts of morality rather than just like, okay, this alien thinks that you should tile the universe paperclips, or something like that, or even that more reasonably, more plausibly. Justice is like that. Yeah. I guess this gets back to there's only one concept anywhere near that vicinity in concept space or something. Maybe we disagree about that. Yeah.DANIELOkay. If I said paperclips instead of schmorality, would you be happy?AARONYes.DANIELI mean, cool, okay, for doing the.AARONMorally correct thing and making me happy.DANIELI strive to. But take the paperclipper species, right? What they do is they notice, like, hey, we really care about making paperclips, right? And, hey, the fact that we care about making paperclips, that's instrumentally useful in making sure that we end up making a bunch of paperclips, right? Isn't that an amazing coincidence that we ended up caring our desires were structured in this correct way that ends up with us making a bunch of paperclips. Is that like, oh, no, total coincidence. That's just what you cared about.AARONYou left at the part where they assert that they're correct about this. That's the weird thing.DANIELWhat proposition are they correct about?AARONOr sorry, I don't think they're correct implicitly.DANIELWhat proposition do they claim they're correct about?AARONThey claim that the world in which there is many paperclips is better than the world in which there is fewer paperclips.DANIELOh, no, they just think it's more paperclipy. They don't think it's better. They don't care about goodness. They care about paperclips.AARONSo it sounds like we're not talking about anything remotely like morality, then, because I could say, yeah, morality, morality. It's pretty airy. It's a lot of air in here. I don't know, maybe I'm just confused.DANIELNo, what I'm saying is, so you're like, oh, it's like this total coincidence that humans we got so lucky. It's so weird that humans ended up caring about morality, and it's like, well, we had to care about something, right? Like anything we don't care about.AARONOh, wow, sorry, I misspoke earlier. And I think that's generating some confusion. I think it's a weird coincidence that we care about happiness and suffering.DANIELHappiness and suffering, sorry. Yeah, but mutatus mutantus, I think you want to say that's like a weird coincidence. And I'm like, well, we had to care about something.AARONYeah, but it could have been like, I don't know, could it have been otherwise, right? At least conceivably it could have been otherwise.DANIELYeah, the paperclip guys, they're like, conceivably, we could have ended up caring about pleasure and suffering. I'm so glad we avoided that.AARONYeah, but they're wrong and we're right.DANIELRight about what?AARONAnd then maybe I don't agree. Maybe this isn't the point you're making. I'm sort of saying that in a blunt way to emphasize it. I feel like people should be skeptical when I say, like okay, I have good reason to think that even though we're in a very similar epistemic position, I have reason to believe that we're right and not the aliens. Right. That's like a hard case to make, but I do think it's true.DANIELThere's no proposition that the aliens and us disagree on yes.AARONThe intrinsic value of pleasure and happiness.DANIELYeah, no, they don't care about value. They care about schmalu, which is just.AARONLike, how much paperclips there is. I don't think that's coherent. I don't think they can care about value.DANIELOkay.AARONThey can, but only insofar as it's a pointer to the exact same not exact, but like, basically the same concept as our value.DANIELSo do you reject the orthogonality thesis?AARONNo.DANIELOkay. I think that is super intelligent.AARONYeah.DANIELSo I take the orthogonality thesis to mean that really smart agents can be motivated by approximately any desires. Does that sound right to you?AARONYeah.DANIELSo what if the desire is like, produce a ton of paperclips?AARONYeah, it can do that descriptively. It's not morally good.DANIELOh, no, it's not morally good at all. They're not trying to be morally good. They're just trying to produce a bunch of paperclips.AARONOkay, in that case, we don't disagree. Yeah, I agree. This is like a conceivable state of the world.DANIELYeah. But what I'm trying to say is when you say it's weird that we got lucky the reason you think it's weird is that you're one of the humans who cares about pleasure and suffering. Whereas if you were one of the aliens who cared about paperclips. The analogous shmarin instead of Aaron would be saying, like, oh, it's crazy that we care about paperclips, because that actually causes us to make a ton of paperclips.AARONDo they intrinsically care about paperclips or is it a means of cement?DANIELIntrinsically, like, same as in the Orphogonality thesis.AARONDo they experience happiness because of the paperclips or is it more of a functional intrinsic value?DANIELI think they probably experience happiness when they create paperclips, but they're not motivated by the happiness. They're motivated by like, they're happy because they succeeded at their goal of making tons of paperclips. If they can make tons of paperclips but not be happy about it, they'd be like, yeah, we should do that. Sorry. No, they wouldn't. They'd say, like, we should do that and then they would do it.AARONWould your case still work if we just pretended that they're not sentient?DANIELYeah, sure.AARONOkay. I think this makes it cleaner for both sides. Yeah, in that case, yes. So I think the thing that I reject is that there's an analog term that's anything like morality in their universe. They can use a different word, but it's pointing to the same concept.DANIELWhen you say anything like morality. So the shared concepts sorry, the shared properties between morality and paperclip promotion is just that you have a species that is dedicated to promoting it.AARONI disagree. I think morality is about goodness and badness.DANIELYes, that's right.AARONOkay. And I think it is totally conceivable. Not even conceivable. So humans wait, what's a good example? In some sense I intrinsically seem to value about regular. I don't know if this is a good example. Let's run with it intrinsically value like regulating my heartbeat. It happens to be true that this is conducive to my happiness and at least local non suffering. But even if it weren't, my brain stem would still try really hard to keep my heart beating or something like that. I reject that there's any way in which promoting heart beatingness is an intrinsic moral or schmoral value or even that could be it could be hypothesized as one but it is not in fact one or something like that.DANIELOkay.AARONLikewise, these aliens could claim that making paperclips is intrinsically good. They could also just make them and not make that claim. And those are two very different things.DANIELThey don't claim it's good. They don't think it's good.AARONThey think it's claim it schmud.DANIELWhich they prefer. Yeah, they prefer.AARONDon't. I think that is also incoherent. I think there is like one concept in that space because wait, I feel like also this is just like at some point it has to cash out in the real world. Right? Unless we're talking about really speculative not even physics.DANIELWhat I mean is they just spend all of their time promoting paperclips and then you send them a copy of Jeremy Bentham's collected writings, they read it and they're like all right, cool. And then they just keep on making paperclips because that's what they want to do.AARONYeah. So descriptively.DANIELSure.AARONBut they never claim that. It's like we haven't even introduced objectivity to this example. So did they ever claim that it's objectively the right thing to do?DANIELNo, they claim that it's objectively the paperclipy thing to do.AARONI agree with that. It is the paperclippy thing to do.DANIELYeah, they're right about stuff. Yeah.AARONSo they're right about that. They're just not a right. So I do think this all comes back down to the question of whether there's analogous concepts in near ish morality that an alien species might point at. Because if there's not, then the paperclippiness is just like a totally radically different type of thing.DANIELBut why does it like when did I say that they were closely analogous? This is what I don't understand.AARONSo it seems to be insinuated by the closeness of the word semantic.DANIELOh yeah, whatever. When I was making it a similar sounding word, all I meant to say is that they talk about it plays a similar role in their culture as morality plays in our culture. Sorry. In terms of their motivations, I should say. Oh, yeah.AARONI think there's plenty of human cultures that are getting at morality. Yeah. So I think especially historically, plenty of human cultures that are getting at the same core concept of morality but just are wrong about it.DANIELYeah, I think that's right.AARONFundamentalist religious communities or whatever, you can't just appeal to like, oh, we're like they have some sort of weird it's kind of similar but very different thing called morality.DANIELAlthough, I don't know, I actually think that okay, backing up. All I'm saying is that beings have to care about something, and we ended up caring about morality. And I don't think, like I don't know, I don't think that's super surprising or coincidental or whatever. A side point I want to make is that I think if you get super into being religious, you might actually start referring to a different concept by morality. How familiar are you with classical theism?AARONThat's not a term that I recognize, although I took a couple of theology classes, so maybe more of them if I hadn't done that.DANIELYeah, so classical theism, it's a view about the nature of God, which is that I'm going to do a bad job of describing it. Yeah, I'm not a classical theist, so you shouldn't take classical theist doctrine from me. But it's basically that God is like sort of God's the being whose attributes are like his existence or something like that. It's weird. But anyway, there's like some school of philosophical where they're like, yeah, there's this transcendent thing called God. We can know God exists from first principles and in particular their account of goodness. So how do you get around the Euphyro dilemma, right? Instead of something like divine command theory, what they say is that when we talk about things being good, good just refers to the nature of God. And if you really internalize that, then I think you might end up referring to something different than actual goodness. Although I think it's probably there's no such being as God in the article. Theist sense.AARONYeah. So they argue what we mean by good is this other.DANIELConcept. They would say that when everyone talks about good, what they actually mean is pertaining to the divine nature, but we just didn't really know that we meant that the same way that when we talked about water, we always meant H 20, but we didn't used to know that.AARONI'm actually not sure if this is I'm very unconfident, but I kind of want to bite the bullet and say, like, okay, fine, in that case, yeah, I'm talking about the divine nature, but we just have radically different understandings of what the divine nature is.DANIELYou think you're talking about the divine nature.AARONRight?DANIELWhy do you think that?AARONSorry, I think I very slightly was not quite pedantic enough. Sorry, bad cell phone or whatever. Once again, not very confident at all.DANIELBut.AARONThink think that I'm willing to I'm so I think that I'm referring to the divine nature, but what I mean by the divine nature is that which these fundamentalist people are referring to. So I want to get around the term and say like, okay, whatever these fundamentalists are referring to, I am also referring to them.DANIELYeah, I should say classical theism is not slightly a different when people say fundamentalists, they often mean like a different corner of Christian space than classical theists. Classical. Theists think like Ed Fesser esoteric Catholics or something. Yeah, they're super into it.AARONOkay, anyway yes, just to put it all together, I think that when I say morality, I am referring to the same thing that these people are referring to by the divine nature. That's what it took me like five minutes to actually say.DANIELOh yeah, so I don't think you are. So when they refer to the divine nature, what they at least think they mean is they think that the divine is sort of defined by the fact that its existence is logically necessary. Its existence is in some sense attributes it couldn't conceivably not have its various attributes. The fact that it is like the primary cause of the world and sustainer of all things. And I just really doubt that the nature of that thing is what you mean by morality.AARONNo, those are properties that they assert, but I feel like tell me if I'm wrong. But my guess is that if one such person were to just suddenly come to believe that actually all of that's right. Except it's not actually logically necessary that the divine nature exists. It happens to be true, but it's not logically necessary. They would still be sort of pointing to the same concept. And I just think, yeah, it's like that, except all those lists of properties are wrong.DANIELI think if that were true, then classical theism would be false.AARONOkay.DANIELSo maybe in fact you're referring to the same thing that they actually mean by the divine nature, but what they think they mean is this classical theistic thing. Right. And it seems plausible to me that some people get into it enough that what they actually are trying to get at when they say good is different than what normal people are trying to get at when they say good.AARONYeah, I don't think that's true. Okay, let's set aside the word morality because especially I feel like in circles that we're in, it has a strong connotation with a sort of like modern ish analytics philosophy, maybe like some other things that are in that category.DANIELYour video is worsen, but your sound is back.AARONOkay, well, okay, I'll just keep talking. All right, so you have the divine nature and morality and maybe other things that are like those two things but still apart from them. So in that class of things and then there's the question of like, okay, maybe everybody necessarily anybody who thinks that there's any true statements about something broadly in their vicinity of goodness in the idea space is pointing to the meta level of that or whichever one of those is truly correct or something. This is pretty speculative. I have not thought about this. I'm not super confident.DANIELYeah, I think I broadly believe this, but I think this is right about most people when they talk. But you could imagine even with utilitarianism, right? Imagine somebody getting super into the weeds of utilitarianism. They lived utilitarianism twenty four, seven. And then maybe at some point they just substitute in utilitarianism for morality. Now when they say morality, they actually just mean utilitarianism and they're just discarding the latter of the broad concepts and intuitions behind them. Such a person might just I don't know, I think that's the kind of thing that can happen. And then you might just want a.AARONDifferent thing by the word. I don't know if it's a bad thing, but I feel like I do this when I say, oh, x is moral to do or morally good to do. It's like, what's the real semantic relationship between that and it's correct on utilitarianism to do? I feel like they're not defined as the same, but they happen to be the same or something. Now we're just talking about how people use words.DANIELYeah, they're definitely going to happen to be the same in the case that utilitarianism is like the right theory of morality. But you could imagine that. You could imagine even in the case where utilitarianism was the wrong theory, you might still just mean utilitarianism by the word good because you just forgot the intuitions from which you were building theory of morality and you're just like, okay, look, I'm just going to talk about utilitarianism now.AARONYeah, I think this is like, yeah, this could happen. I feel like this is a cop out and like a non answer, but I feel like getting into the weeds of the philosophy of language and what people mean by concepts and words and true the true nature of concepts. It's just not actually that useful. Or maybe it's just not as interesting to me as I'm glad that somebody thought about that ever.DANIELI think this can happen, though. I think this is actually a practical concern. Right. Okay. Utilitarianism might be wrong, right? Does that strike you as right? Yeah, I think it's possible for you to use language in such a way that if utilitarianism were wrong, what that would mean is that in ordinary language, goodness, the good thing to do is not always the utilitarian thing to do, right? Yes, but I think it's possible to get down an ideological rabbit hole. This is not specific to utilitarianism. Right. I think this can happen to tons of things where when you say goodness, you just mean utilitarianism and you don't have a word for what everyone else meant by goodness, then I think that's really hard to recover from. And I think that's the kind of thing that can conceivably happen and maybe sometimes actually happens.AARONYeah, I guess as an empirical matter and like an empirical psychological matter and yes. Do people's brains ever operate this way? Yes. I don't really know where that leaves that leaves us. Maybe we should move on to a different topic or whatever.DANIELCan I just say one more thing?AARONYeah, totally.DANIELFirst, I should just give this broad disclaimer that I'm not a philosopher and I don't really know what I'm talking about. But the second thing is that particular final point. I was sort of inspired by a paper I read. I think it's called, like, do Christians and Muslims worship the same god? Which is actually a paper about the philosophy of naming and what it means for proper names to refer to the same thing. And it's pretty interesting, and it has a footnote about why you would want to discourage blasphemy, which is sort of about this. Anyway.AARONNo, I personally don't find this super interesting. I can sort of see how somebody would and I also think it's potentially important, but I think it's maybe yeah.DANIELActually it's actually kind of funny. Can I tell you a thing that I'm a little bit confused about?AARONYeah, sure.DANIELSo philosophers just there's this branch of philosophy that's the philosophy of language, and in particular the philosophy of right. Like, what does it mean when we say a word refers to something in the real world? And some subsection of this is the philosophy of proper names. Right. So when I say Aaron is going to the like, what do I mean by know who is like, if it turned out that these interactions that I'd been having with an online like, all of them were faked, but there was a real human named Bergman, would that count as making that send is true or whatever? Anyway, there's some philosophy on this topic, and apparently we didn't need it to build a really smart AI. No AI person has studied this. Essentially, these theories are not really baked into the way we do AI these days.AARONWhat do you think that implies or suggests?DANIELI think it's a bit confusing. I think naively, you might have thought that AIS would have to refer to things, and naively, you might have thought that in order for us to make that happen, we would have had to understand the philosophy of reference or of naming, at least on some sort of basic level. But apparently we just didn't have to. Apparently we could just like I don't have that.AARONIn fact, just hearing your description, my initial intuition is like, man, this does not matter for anything.DANIELOkay. Can I try and convince you that it should matter? Yeah, tell me how I fail to convince you.AARONYeah, all right.DANIELHumans are pretty smart, right? We're like the prototypical smart thing. How are humans smart? I think one of the main ingredients of that is that we have language. Right?AARONYes. Oh, and by the way, this gets to the unpublished episode with Nathan Barnard.DANIELComing out an UN I think I've seen an episode with him.AARONOh, yeah. This is the second one because he's.DANIELBeen very oh, exciting. All right, well well, maybe all this will be superseded by this unpublished episode.AARONI don't think so. We'll see.DANIELBut okay, we have language, right. Why is language useful? Well, I think it's probably useful in part because it refers to stuff. When I say stuff, I'm talking about the real world, right?AARONYes.DANIELNow, you might think that in order to build a machine that was smart and wielded the language usefully, it would also have to have language. We would have to build it such that its language referred to the real world. Right. And you might further think that in order to build something that use languages that actually succeeds at doing reference, we would have to understand what reference was.AARONYes. I don't think that's right. Because insofar as we can get what we call useful is language in, language out without any direct interaction, without the AIS directly manipulating the world, or maybe not directly, but without using language understanders or beings that do have this reference property, that's what their language means to them, then this would be right. But because we have Chat GPT, what the use comes from is like giving language to humans, and the humans have reference to the real world. But if the humans you need some connection to your reference, but it doesn't have to be at every level or something like that.DANIELOkay, so do you think that suppose we had something that was like Chat GPT, but we gave it access to some robot limbs and it could pick up mice. Maybe it could pick up apples and throw the apples into the power furnace powering its data center. We give it these limbs and these actuators sort of analogous to how humans interact with the world. Do you think in order to make a thing like that that worked, we would need to understand the philosophy of reference?AARONNo. I'm not sure why.DANIELI also don't know why.AARONOkay, well, evolution didn't understand the philosophy of reference. I don't know what that tells us.DANIELI actually think this is, like, my lead answer of, like, we're just making AIS by just randomly tweaking them until they work. That's my rough summary of Scastic gradient descent. In some sense, this does not require you to have a strong sense of how to implement your AIS. Maybe that's why we don't need to.AARONUnderstand philosophy or the SDD process is doing the philosophy. In some sense, that's kind of how I think about it or how I think about it now. I guess during the SDD process, you're, like, tweaking basically the algorithm, and at the end of the day, probably in order to, say, pick up marbles or something, reference to a particular marble or the concept of marble, not only the concept, but both the concept

277: Daniela Vollenweider ist Personal Trainerin und Expertin für den weiblichen Beckenboden. Als langjährige Kundin kam sie im Herbst 2022 erneut auf mich zu, um einen 1:1 Strategietag zu vereinbaren. Ihr Ziel: mehr Umsatz, aber vor allem mehr Gewinn für ihre Launches und eine höhere Conversion Rate. Vor unserem 1:1 Strategietag habe ich all ihre Launch-Inhalte in der Tiefe analysiert. An unserem Strategietag habe ich Daniela mein Feedback zu ihren Launch-Inhalten gegeben und wir haben u.a. ihre kostenfreie 5-Tage-Challenge inhaltlich noch mal neu und mehr nach verkaufspsychologischen Gesichtspunkten strukturiert. Das Ergebnis kann sich sehen lassen: Der erste Launch nach unserem Strategietag brachte Daniela erstmals einen 5-stelligen Umsatz ein – und der zweite Launch ein paar Monate später toppte erneut ihre Ergebnisse. In diesem Kundeninterview erzählt Daniela von ihren Erfahrungen mit unserer Zusammenarbeit. Mehr über Daniela und ihre Angebote findest du auf ihrer Website. Mehr über Launchmagie® Mehr über Grow With Joy Mit Katharina 1:1 arbeiten

Mit 32 Jahren die erste Beziehung: Daniela ist inzwischen seit 3 Jahren glücklich mit ihrem Partner zusammen. Zuvor war sie „ihr Leben lang Single“, wie sie selbst sagt. Was hat sich verändert, dass es dann schließlich geklappt hat mit der Partnerschaft? Welche Tipps hat sie für andere „ewige Singles“? Wie ihr unser Coaching dabei geholfen hat sich zu öffnen und jemanden kennenzulernen hörst du in dieser Folge.

Daniela går upp tidigt och släpps ut ur sin cell. Nu ska hon lämna fängelset efter tre år. Men den första tiden i frihet blir inte som hon hoppats på. P3 Krim har träffat Daniela igen. Hon som blev mamma medan hon satt inne för brott.Nu har hon muckat från fängelset och ska försöka skaffa sig ett liv utanför murarna. Det blir mycket frustration och frestelser. Ska hon klara att hålla sig ifrån att trilla dit på droger och kriminalitet igen?Medverkande:Daniela som avtjänat fängelsestraffHenrik Blomerus, Kris, Kriminellas revansch i samhälletErika Salander, Brå, Brottsförebyggande rådetProgramledare: Linus Lindahl och Mariela Quintana MelinProducent: Kina PohjanenLjudtekniker: Johan HörnqvistKontakt: p3krim@sverigesradio.seTipstelefon: 0734-61 29 15 (samma på Signal)

(Daniel - Indie Animation)   In this episode, I had the honour to have Danielas my guest. He shared with me his interest in making indie animation as his hobby.   Definition: Animation is a method by which still figures are manipulated to appear as moving images. In traditional animation, images are drawn or painted by hand on transparent celluloid sheets to be photographed and exhibited on film. Today, most animations are made with computer-generated imagery (CGI). Computer animation can be very detailed 3D animation, while 2D computer animation (which may have the look of traditional animation) can be used for stylistic reasons, low bandwidth, or faster real-time renderings. Other common animation methods apply a stop motion technique to two- and three-dimensional objects like paper cutouts, puppets, or clay figures. Wikipedia contributors. (2022, November 16). Animation. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 01:49, November 22, 2022, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animation&oldid=1122146848   Daniel's Links Amazon Prime video: https://www.amazon.com/Love-Magic-Daniel-M-Rosales/dp/B08LD5XJV4    Time For Your Hobby links: Website: Time For Your Hobby website (click to find Apple, Spotify, Google and more) Merch: TFYHpodcast (on Redbubble) Instagram: @timeforyourhobby Twitter: @tfyhpodcast Podchaser: Time For Your Hobby  Patreon: Timeforyourhobby  Email: timeforyourhobby@gmail.com     If you like this episode and think it can be helpful to someone you are more than welcome to share it and leave a review. If you want to be on my podcast or have any questions at all, by all means, contact me through any of the platforms above. So until the next episode... make some time for your hobby.   Shout out to my Patrons: Chess Talk (https://chesstalk.podbean.com/) Mélissa Sabrina Hughes Berry   Take care,

¡ESCRIBÍ UN LIBRO! Quiero contarte sobre mi nuevo proyecto: flores de concreto, florece en la adversidad. Un libro que me tomó más de dos años escribir y publicar. Espero te guste!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesinstagram @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerrerowww.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hoy en: ¿por qué nos encanta que nos traten mal? te presento varias ideas de la raíz de este problema. TQMAmor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerrerowww.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hablemos del lucky girl syndrome popularizado en tiktok por dos chicas comiendo noodles en su carro. Este es un tema que me pidieron y se me hace interesante hablar del poder de la atracción ahora con 33 años. Espero te guste!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mi diario aqui:www.danielaguerrero.netcódigo: gratitud Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hablemos sobre autenticidad y un poco sobre la gran filósofa Simone de Beauvoir. Si te gusta el episodio compártelo con tus amigos.Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aquí:www.danielaguerrero.netCódigo de descuento: GRATITUD Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Todo sale de una pregunta por instagram: ¿está bien si quiero ligar en mi trabajo? dangerooooous!!! Vamos a platicar sobre ligar en el trabajo, en qué tipo de lugares sí en que otros no y uno que otro tip para acercarte a alguien que te gusta.Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes socialesinstagram @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroEsta semana grandes descuentos enwww.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Aquí mi resumen de lo que ha sido tomar antidepresivos por un año exacto, espero que les sirva a los que van a empezar o tienen dudas. Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes sociales:ig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis productos aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episodio inspirado en la canción que me pusieron en savasana el viernes pasado: TRUST de Alexia Chellun. Espero te guste el episodio!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis productos:www.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

¡¡Cumpleaños feliz!! Estas son 33 lecciones de vida que he aprendido en 33 años. ¡Que lo disfrutes!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes ig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis productos:www.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

En este episodio vestida como Freddy Krueger te platico sobre las diferencias entre inteligencia e intuición. Es hora de que le vayamos poniendo atención a nuestras palabras, cómo te refieres a ti, que sepas que eres una mujer sumamente inteligente y cómo hacerle para conectar con esa parte tuya llamada intuición. Espero te guste!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroConsigue mis diarios y tazas aquiwww.danielaguerreroCodigo: GRATITUD:) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Llegamos al episodio 170! :) que emoción! Para este episodio quise hablar sobre crear silencio y diseñar tu espacio de acuerdo a lo que TU elijas querer escuchar y no lo que el mundo te aviente. Hablo tambien de re tomar el control sobre qué contenido consumimos y otros hábitos para mejorar tu día. Espero te guste!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes socialesInstagram @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere tus diarios y tazas aqui:www.danielaguerrero.netCódigo: GRATITUD Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

En este episodio hablo sobre cómo el hecho de que otras personas triunfen nos puede hacer sentir menos y disminuir nuestro valor. Si te gusta el episodio compártelo con alguien que necesite escuchar esto!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere tu taza de Mental Health Matters aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hattest du schon mal den Verdacht, dass dein Kind hochbegabt sein könnte - aber gewisse Verhaltensweisen haben dich immer wieder daran zweifeln lassen? Dann ist diese Folge von Power ON für dich. Darin teilt die Begabungspädagogin Daniela Heiser mit uns: Wie du als Eltern überdurchschnittliche Begabung bei deinen Kindern erkennen kannst Wie du als Eltern dein hoch-begabtes Kind bestmöglich fördern und unterstützen kannst Was typische Herausforderungen sind von Eltern mit hochbegabten Kindern? Was rückblickend Danielas top 3 Erkenntnisse waren und Tipps sind bzgl. der Vereinbarkeit von Job und Familie Hör rein und lass dich inspirieren. Wie immer schreib mir auch gerne deine Gedanken zu dieser Folge und was du aus der Folge für dich mitnimmst oder welche Fragen es bei dir auslöst. Ich freue mich von dir zu hören. Und für alle die noch mehr dazu erfahren wollen geht es hier zu den angesprochenen Webinars für Eltern und Erzieher von Daniela: Webinar für Eltern Webinar für Erzieher Schön, dass es dich gibt und Danke, dass du Hörer/-in von Power ON bist. Power ON! Deine Elisabeth ---- Jeden zweiten Donnerstag eine neue Folge von Power On Möchtest du wieder Priorität im eigenen Leben sein? Dann kannst du dich hier für meinen online Kurs: Hol dir deine Power zurück anmelden Let's keep in touch https://elisabeth-thiessen.com Lass mir gerne auch eine Rezension zum Podcast da. Danke, dass du den Podcast hörst, weiterempfiehlst und bewertest! Es ist immer wieder so schön, eure Rezensionen zum Podcast zu lesen.

Esta es la parte 2 de mi viaje solitario por Los Angeles, California. Spoiler alert: necesito volver! :DAmor,DanielaSígueme en redesInstagram @danielaguerreroTiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hola! En este episodio te platico sobre la primera parte SOLA en los ángeles, precios, estancia, vuelo y mi experiencia estos 3 días y medio que he estado aquí en Downtown LA, cómo me he movido, qué he hecho y a quienes he conocido. Espero te guste el episodio!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes ig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

En este episodio hablo sobre no sentirte apta o con las credenciales para hacer algo que (claro que puedes hacer), solo que a la mente le gusta meternos el pie y hacernos pensar que no somos merecedores de lo que tenemos. Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis productos aqui:www.danielaguerrero.netCODIGO: GRATITUD Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Si crees que estás perdiendo el tiempo, escucha este episodio. Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.netCODIGO: GRATITUD See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Hablemos de FLUIR y de quitarnos expectativas y cómo deberían ser esas primeras citas al conocer a alguien.Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios de gratitud y amor propio aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Empecemos por preguntarnos, ¿cómo llegamos ahí? ¿porqué nos quedamos? ¿qué nos detiene a irnos? y lo mas importante...¿cómo no volver a repetir una relación así?Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes ig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroInscríbete a mi worthshop aquiwww.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Cómo se siente una amistad entre mujeres REAL, linda, sana vs cómo se siente una falsa. Espero te guste el episodio!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Estoy leyendo este libro llamado "Hijos adultos de padres emocionalmente inmaduros", voy en la página 60 y ya quise hablar sobre lo que he aprendido de este comportamiento en algunos padres con el fin de entenderlos, no odiarlos, y que tu puedas vivir sin la frustración de porqué no te dieron lo que necesitabas. Al saber esto también ayuda a tus próximas relaciones de pareja y amigos. Espero que te guste el episodio.Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aquí:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

¿Nos debería de obsesionar nuestro trabajo? ¿La única forma de llegar al éxito es pensar solo en eso todo el día? ¿Me debería de despertar más temprano para trabajar más en lo que hago? Todas estas preguntas nacen después de ver una película en Netflix. Espero te guste el episodioAmor,DanielaSígueme en redes socialesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aquí:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Bienvenido a tu meditación para terminar el día tranquilo y seguro. La escribí pensando en tener una noche tranquila y una mañana perfecta. Compártela con tus amigos y escúchala las veces que la necesites.Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes socialesinstagram @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroInvierte en tu amor propio e inscríbete a mi taller WORTHSHOP aquí:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Te quiero compartir algo de lo que aprendí del libro más reciente que leí: "El niño que fue criado como perro" por el Dr. Bruce Perry. El Dr. Bruce es un psiquiatra con enfoque en trauma infantil, desde que leí What Happened to You? quise leer más sobre él y este es un libro específico de varios casos que trató con niños con traumas fuertes pero distintos. Si has pasado por trauma y te estos temas te afectan te recomiendo que no lo escuches o esperes un tiempo adecuado para hacerlo. En lo personal me gustó mucho aprender sobre este tema. Amor,DanielaSígueme en mis redes:ig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroInscríbete a mi Worthshop: taller de confianza y amor propio aquí:https://danielaguerrero.net/collections/featured-products/products/worthshop-by-daniela-guerrero See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Mi humilde opinión a cerca de estar en una relación amorosa solo por dinero o que éste sea un motivo muy significativo del porqué estás con esa persona. ¿Dónde quedó el amor? Déjame saber qué piensas en mi instagram @danielaguerrero y comparte este episodio si te gustó!Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

¿Alguna vez te has sentido muy viejo para hacer algo? Sí, yo también. Pero eso no me ha detenido a bajar la cabeza, hacer el rídiculo y aprender cosas nuevas para sacarme todas las espinas y curiosidades que rondan por mi cabeza. No nos quedemos en el ¿qué hubiera pasado? Si te gusta este episodio compártelo con tus amigos :)Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroCompra mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

En este episodio indago un poco sobre porqué no podemos estar solos con nuestra presencia, lo normal y confrontativo que es estar solos con nuestros pensamientos y cómo vivir la magia de la soledad de una forma saludable. Si te gusta el episodio compártelo con tus amigos :)Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroCompra mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Porque usted lo pidió, "los casi algo", un tema que nos rompe el corazón a todos, esa persona que estaba a punto de ser y por cosas de la vida no fue. Espero este episodio te traiga paz. Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesig @danielaguerrerotiktok @danyguerreroCompra mis diarios aqui:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Un episodio para sernos siempre fieles a nosotros mismos y dejar de querer impresionar a todos. Los invito a reconocer cuando valoramos a personas por las razones equivocadas. Amor,DanielaSígueme en redesInstagram @danielaguerreroTiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Me duele tanto que te vayas con otra, sabiendo que yo te ayudé a salir adelante, ahora será otra persona quien goce de tu mejor versión. Espero te guste el episodio.Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes:IG @danielaguerreroTiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios aquíwww.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Check out this week's episode of Mothers In Construction Podcast. M.I.C, Episode 32 - I'm Not Supposed To Be Here is with Daniela Velasquez. Daniela is the CEO of Velasquez Construction Solutions, an industrial and commercial electrical contractor in Wharton, TX. She has been a member of the National Association of Women in Construction (NAWIC) for the last three years. She is the past NAWIC Safety Chair and is currently serving as Recording Secretary. Daniela won the NAWIC Executive Award in 2021. In her free time, Daniela serves as a troop leader for Girl Scouts of America. She aspires to be a good role model and play a supporting role in advancing women in construction and women everywhere. Daniela discusses her plight from being a teen mom and high school dropout all the way to now being the CEO of a company ! When we're in the thick of life's struggles or unfavorable circumstances we can often get caught up in those moments not knowing why we have to endure. We are here to tell you to hang in there. There's always a purpose . When you get to the other side of the storm it becomes your testimony to help others. Daniela is doing just that. Her goal is to continue to help others provide for their families and to inspire other young women, the young “Danielas”, to explore endless possibilities. Daniela tells us to look at the step in front of you because it's all that you need to propel forward. Make sure you tune in to hear this amazing woman. She's nothing short of inspiring . Listen to her story !

Cinco ejercicios para aumentar la confianza en ti mismo, creértela y proyectar seguridad ante los demás. Si te gusta el episodio compártelo con tus amigos :) Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes Instagram @danielaguerreroTiktok @danyguerreroAdquiere tus diarios aquí:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Hablemos del miedo a quedarnos solos. Es decir, nunca encontrar pareja, alguien con quien podamos compartir nuestra vida. ¿Y si me quedo solo para siempre? Hablemos de eso. Comparte si te gusta :) Amor,DanielaSígueme en redes:IG: @danielaguerreroTiktok: @danyguerreroAdquiere mis diarios:www.danielaguerrero.net See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Das erste Aprilwochenende eröffnete die Triathlonsaison 2022 so richtig: Während es auf den Mitteldistanzen um die Tests für die Ironman-WM in Utah ging, wurden auf der Langdistanz sechs Kona-Tickets ausgefochten – mit einer strahlenden deutschen Siegerin, die Lars Wichtert und Frank Wechsel im Podcast besucht.

Part 2 of this episode.  Today's episode is in English because Daniela comes from Czech Republic. In this episode we talk about Danielas story and how she ended up working as an Intimacy Coach. Intimacy is not just about sex. It is about establishing an intimate relationship with ourselves, with people close to us. Intimacy, that pleasant feeling of trust, union and understanding without words, stands on six pillars. It starts with ourselves.    In this episode we talk about what it is that hinders us from being comfortable being intimate. This tends to be our past trauma. Trauma are episodes experienced throughout life which have impacted us - our nervous system, reactions, triggers, moods, preferences, fears and behavior.     We talk through different types of trauma and how to deal with it and why it is important to deal with it. I share my own trauma and my path through discomfort and triggers. How going into the discomfort has helped me understand myself and people around me better. BEAR WITH ME! Because talking about these incidents was scary and super vulnerable. I have been holding them close to my chest for many many years.      I want to share my biggest trauma exactly because I haven't shared the stories with anyone for 15 years. I felt weak, dirty, unattractive, ashamed, guilty, like a burden and of less value to my partners, friends, family and employers because of something someone else did to me against my will. I was afraid that If they knew they would judge me and see me as a victim and a person who could not take care of herself. This was such a big contrast to how I wanted people to view me, so it was easier to keep quiet. Little did I know that keeping quiet and pretending it never impacted me actually would become my biggest enemy. It created triggers and over time I became more and more of a control freak. Before getting this knowledge I could not understand why I suddenly changed my way of being so intensely in such a short period of time. Makes total sense now that I see the links after having worked through my trauma this fall and winter.     Daniela is the founder of the Czech Association of the Sexological Bodywork, Tantra Center Pilsen and I am also the owner of the Freya Centrum.     “Can you imagine trying to grow plums in a paradise of coconut palms? We often treat ourselves the same way. We force ourselves to do things that are contrary to what our inner Self wants and is capable of. And then we are surprised that we are not being as successful as the others. I have tried to “plant” myself in many islands before I have finally found my own. The key to success is LOVE – self-love.”     If you want coaching by Daniela or to attend one of her workshops you find more information here:   https://www.danielatorp.com/     Hvem er jeg?  Therese Fallentin heter jeg. Stavangerjente som har reist verden rundt og studert og jobbet i Trondheim, Tyskland, Belgia, Valdres og Oslo. Jeg ELSKER å lære av andres historier og kunnskap og å dele mine egne historier og kunnskap. Er en over gjennomsnittet løsningsorientert, empatisk og proaktiv utfordrer med engasjement for bærekraftig utvikling av mennesker og samfunnet. I podkasten utfordres skambelagte tema, deles inspirerende historier og vises det hvordan vi kan være oss selv, leve i tråd med våre faktiske verdier, leve drømmene våre, ha positiv påvirkning, skape og stå opp mot press og forventninger.  Jeg drives av å se mennesker blomstre, bedrifter mestre og produkter møte behov, i et samspill som bidrar til vekst for samfunnet, menneskeheten og kloden. Du kan lese mer om meg,  om tanken bak podkasten og finne mer informasjon om en del av temaene som tas opp i podkasten på LinkedIn, hjemmesiden min eller Instagram og linkene under    https://www.linkedin.com/in/therese-fallentin-032b5241/   https://magefolelsen.com/   https://www.instagram.com/magefoelelsen.podcast/     Vær sjefen i ditt eget liv og lag deg en fin dag

Today's episode is in English because Daniela comes from Czech Republic. In this episode we talk about Danielas story and how she ended up working as an Intimacy Coach. Intimacy is not just about sex. It is about establishing an intimate relationship with ourselves, with people close to us. Intimacy, that pleasant feeling of trust, union and understanding without words, stands on six pillars. It starts with ourselves.    In this episode we talk about what it is that hinders us from being comfortable being intimate. This tends to be our past trauma. Trauma are episodes experienced throughout life which have impacted us - our nervous system, reactions, triggers, moods, preferences, fears and behavior.     We talk through different types of trauma and how to deal with it and why it is important to deal with it. I share my own trauma and my path through discomfort and triggers. How going into the discomfort has helped me understand myself and people around me better. BEAR WITH ME! Because talking about these incidents was scary and super vulnerable. I have been holding them close to my chest for many many years.      I want to share my biggest trauma exactly because I haven't shared the stories with anyone for 15 years. I felt weak, dirty, unattractive, ashamed, guilty, like a burden and of less value to my partners, friends, family and employers because of something someone else did to me against my will. I was afraid that If they knew they would judge me and see me as a victim and a person who could not take care of herself. This was such a big contrast to how I wanted people to view me, so it was easier to keep quiet. Little did I know that keeping quiet and pretending it never impacted me actually would become my biggest enemy. It created triggers and over time I became more and more of a control freak. Before getting this knowledge I could not understand why I suddenly changed my way of being so intensely in such a short period of time. Makes total sense now that I see the links after having worked through my trauma this fall and winter.     Daniela is the founder of the Czech Association of the Sexological Bodywork, Tantra Center Pilsen and I am also the owner of the Freya Centrum.     “Can you imagine trying to grow plums in a paradise of coconut palms? We often treat ourselves the same way. We force ourselves to do things that are contrary to what our inner Self wants and is capable of. And then we are surprised that we are not being as successful as the others. I have tried to “plant” myself in many islands before I have finally found my own. The key to success is LOVE – self-love.”     If you want coaching by Daniela or to attend one of her workshops you find more information here:   https://www.danielatorp.com/     Hvem er jeg?  Therese Fallentin heter jeg. Stavangerjente som har reist verden rundt og studert og jobbet i Trondheim, Tyskland, Belgia, Valdres og Oslo. Jeg ELSKER å lære av andres historier og kunnskap og å dele mine egne historier og kunnskap. Er en over gjennomsnittet løsningsorientert, empatisk og proaktiv utfordrer med engasjement for bærekraftig utvikling av mennesker og samfunnet. I podkasten utfordres skambelagte tema, deles inspirerende historier og vises det hvordan vi kan være oss selv, leve i tråd med våre faktiske verdier, leve drømmene våre, ha positiv påvirkning, skape og stå opp mot press og forventninger.  Jeg drives av å se mennesker blomstre, bedrifter mestre og produkter møte behov, i et samspill som bidrar til vekst for samfunnet, menneskeheten og kloden. Du kan lese mer om meg,  om tanken bak podkasten og finne mer informasjon om en del av temaene som tas opp i podkasten på LinkedIn, hjemmesiden min eller Instagram og linkene under    https://www.linkedin.com/in/therese-fallentin-032b5241/   https://magefolelsen.com/   https://www.instagram.com/magefoelelsen.podcast/     Vær sjefen i ditt eget liv og lag deg en fin dag

Check out these beautiful vocals by Hayley Mumaw!! So honored and excited that the den has a theme song. Written and sung by the lovely Hayley Mumaw! Honoring scripture Psalms 91 and reminding us to take up our full armor of Christ. Ephesians 6:10-18 The Armor of God 10 Finally, be strong in the Lord(A) and in his mighty power.(B) 11 Put on the full armor of God,(C) so that you can take your stand against the devil's schemes. 12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood,(D) but against the rulers, against the authorities,(E) against the powers(F) of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.(G) 13 Therefore put on the full armor of God,(H) so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. 14 Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist,(I) with the breastplate of righteousness in place,(J) 15 and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace.(K) 16 In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith,(L) with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.(M) 17 Take the helmet of salvation(N) and the sword of the Spirit,(O) which is the word of God.(P) 18 And pray in the Spirit(Q) on all occasions(R) with all kinds of prayers and requests.(S) With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying(T) for all the Lord's people. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielasden/message