Podcast appearances and mentions of ian miles cheong

Investigative reporter and podcast host Nick Sortor reported on his Twitter page that the company "Influenceable" is paying MAGA influencers to support Big Soda. Sortor says he became suspicious when popular Trump-supporting pages like Clown World, Eric Daugherty, Not Jerome Powell and Ian Miles Cheong all posted remarkably similar tweets, each decrying the idea that SNAP (food stamps) recipients would be barred from using their benefits to purchase soda products. Jimmy and Americans' Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss Sortor's exposé and why prominent figures online should always disclose if they are being paid to promote a certain product or viewpoint.  Plus segments on Bill Maher's recent realization that the Democratic Party is cooked and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's tone-deaf comments on Social Security. Also featuring Stef Zamorano!

Today, we're looking at Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's meeting with new Prime Minister Mark Carney, following the premier's announcement of amendments to the province's Critical Infrastructure Defence Act, which asserted more authority over natural resources. Plus, New Democrats are pushing Canadians to cancel their travel plans to the United States — not because of the plummeting value of the loonie, but because of President Trump's ongoing 51st state rhetoric and tariffs. And finally, radical left-wing extremism has been exported from the U.S., with Tesla vehicles and dealerships now being targeted in Canada.

This week on the Primo episode, Jesse and Katie discuss a recent controversy on book internet concerning an allegedly racist AI. Plus, Ian Miles Cheong investigates government aid, and an update on The Stranger. Pre-order Katie's bookTwo Stranger Reporters Resign After Investigation Into Allegations of Ethical Breaches - PubliCola To hear more, visit www.blockedandreported.org

Josie is joined by a wide array of guests well known to X, for a vibrant and engaging discussion on the eve of Election Day. Listen in for an almost frenetic mix of anticipation, last-minute persuasion, speculation, perspective, and insight from valuable voices including, The Rabbit Hole, Clint Russell, Lectern Leader, and Ian Miles Cheong.

SERIES 2 EPISODE 7: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: Trump. Friday, Microsoft said the Iranians would try to meddle in the election.  SATURDAY… YOUR campaign computers get hacked - you say. By the Iranians – you say. And you didn't report it to the FBII. Even though it's by Iran and part of your whole campaign scam, Trump, is that Iran is the root of all evil.  And you didn't report it to the F-B-I, and you didn't provide any evidence. Only yesterday, the FBI issued another anonymous, not even a spokesman's name attached to it, just like that No-He-Was-Too-Hit-By-A-Bullet announcement – gave a clear and compelling picture of the vast team that has fanned out across the country, across the internet, across the world to track down this evil. Quote: “We can confirm the FBI is investigating this matter.” Investigating… who? Investigating… what? Whether they were really hacked? Whether they were really hacked by the Iranians? Whether Trump made it all up? Whether the Trump campaign fell for some sort of phishing by a porn site? Also the material was supposed to hurt Trump? And was leaked to The Washington Post and Politico, which have repeatedly been helping Trump in this campaign? What's hurting Trump, and which the media is under-reporting, is that his polls are now cratering. Last week The New York Times had Kamala Harris ahead by 4 in each of the Rust Belt States. Now, Bullfinch Group for a site supposedly servicing independent voters: Harris by FOUR in Pennsylvania, by FIVE in Michigan, by NINE in Wisconsin. There's a tie in North Carolina. There's a lead of nearly three points at 538 and of more than half a point at the right-poisoned RCP poll of polls. And most staggeringly - and most undercovered - from The New York Times: “Two private polls conducted in Ohio recently by Republican poillsters – which Mr. Trump carried in 2020 with 53 percent of the vote – showed him receiving less than 50 percent of the vote against Ms. Harris in the state, according to a person with direct knowledge of the data.” Holy crap.  B-Block (31:40) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: The unaided ease by which that Turkish guy won a shooting medal at the Olympics has the inevitable side effect. 27% of Brits tell pollsters that if they started now THEY could make the 2028 British Olympic team. The aforementioned LaCivita gets blown up by Matt Dowd over Swift Boating. And the tape CNN found from January 6th from the North Carolina candidate to run schools there, Michele Morrow. All it is is a demand that Trump conduct a military coup against then President-elect Biden. (41:50) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: In memory of WCBS Radio, the day its news director validated my entire existence as an aspiring 20-year old broadcaster. The saga of The Adler Letter. C-Block (50:30) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: The Adler Letter and MY legacy of WCBS Radio, Part TwoSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Buddy fell off! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-miller642/support

Patrick breaks down his latest article on the Haitian cannibalism hysteria. Vital Dissent website Join my email list and become a premium member: http://www.vitaldissent.club Vital Dissent Merch 10% off with code VD10 Show Notes: Culture Warriors Spread Disinfo on ‘Haitian Cannibals By Patrick MacFarlane Original "Haitian Cannibalism" Report from Daily Express US  Dom Lucre Misframed Haitian Cannibal Video Email Update with links to the Twitter Space Dan Cohen's Haiti Documentary

WEBSITE https://sites.google.com/view/alientom/home About the Show: The New Normal Old Timey Headline News Show is a captivating blend of cutting-edge technology and nostalgic radio vibes. Imagine the crackling AM static of yesteryears interwoven with the crystal-clear voices of our broadcasters. It's like tuning in to a parallel universe where AI algorithms sip coffee with vintage microphones, and headlines from the future collide with echoes from the past. Podcast Highlights: Fusion of Eras: Our show bridges the gap between modern computer wizardry and the golden age of radio. We're the time-traveling newsroom you never knew you needed. Static and Clarity: The ambient noise of AM radio—those delightful imperfections—meets the precision of AI-generated content. It's a harmonious cacophony that keeps listeners hooked. Stranger Things Meets the News: Picture Eleven from Stranger Things reading the morning headlines. That's the vibe we're going for—an otherworldly blend of eerie and informative. Why You Should Tune In: Nostalgia Reimagined: If you miss the days of crackling radios and mysterious broadcasts, we've got your fix. Future-Proofed News: Our headlines might be from tomorrow, but the delivery feels delightfully retro. Escape the Mundane: Dive into our auditory time capsule and escape the mundane. The New Normal awaits. Where to Find Us: Subscribe to The New Normal Old Timey Headline News Show on your favorite podcast platform. Remember, the past and future collide here, and the result is pure auditory magic. Join us as we ride the airwaves, blending old-school charm with futuristic flair. The New Normal Old Timey Headline News Show—it's not just news; it's an experience.

OI! In this episode, we talk about the OD (A Hideo Kojima Game) of TwoMad, Rachel Dolezal's Return, Ian Miles Cheong's panic button to avoid beheading and more! Check out https://www.kushydreams.com and use code LOUD25 after using the link!⁠Buy merch ⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/LoudEqualsFunny⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ - * loudequalsfunny.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠| for sponsorship opportunites email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠hosts@loudequalsfunny.com⁠⁠Fuzhou | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcbE7lt3O-8vPm1SwS6oC9w⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tristan | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twitter.com/GarbaggioGoblin⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠DeadwingDork | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3D2AvQ1WyZwufYcVz_DwTw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠*Note: Make sure to CONNECT your patreon with spotify, that way it connects--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/loudequalsfunny/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/loudequalsfunny/support Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Turns out Ian Miles Cheong is alive and still tweeting

EPISODE #38: We're back for your weekly Pirate Wires podcast! Are you ready for this one? Because this week is a wild ride. We start off talking about Alicia Keys' vocal mistake at the Super Bowl and the NFL erasing all memory of it from the internet.. leading to a discussion on the Mandela Effect. We then move on to reacting to the Putin/Tucker interview while Biden holds a press conference to prove that he's not senile. Jon Stewart returns and calls out Biden's age. River then tells us this crazy story about Tiffany Henyard: America's Mayor. We then follow up with right wing outrage over Kristen Stewarts androgynous photoshoot, the latest update on Twitter famous' Ian Miles Cheong. Finally.. we wrap up with the wild news on the one and only Rachel Dolezal. Featuring Mike Solana, Brandon Gorrell, River Page, Sanjana Friedman Subscribe to Pirate Wires: https://www.piratewires.com/ Topics Discussed: https://www.piratewires.com/p/tiffany-henyard-americas-mayor?f=home Pirate Wires Twitter: https://twitter.com/PirateWires Mike Twitter: https://twitter.com/micsolana Brandon Twitter: https://twitter.com/brandongorrell River Twitter: https://twitter.com/river_is_nice Sanjana Twitter: https://twitter.com/metaversehell TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Welcome Back To The Pod! Like & Subscribe 1:00 - Super Bowl Erasure! Alicia Keys Vocal Flub Removed From The Internet 3:15 - The Re-Writing Of History On The Internet 11:00 - The Mandela Effect 22:00 - Putin/Tucker Reaction & Jon Stewart Return 38:30 - Tiffany Henyard: America's Mayor 51:40 - Kristen Stewart Cover Shoot For Rolling Stone Causes Right Wing Outrage 01:02:10 - Ian Miles Cheong - WTF is going on?! 01:06:30 - Thanks For Watching! Like & Subscribe! 01:06:45 - JUST KIDDING - We Have To Talk About Rachel Dolezal 01:14:00 - See You All Next Week! Tell Your Friends!

The SUPER BOWL is over.. but the fun has JUST STARTED. Maybe not in the best way though.. shots rang out while Kansas City natives were trying to celebrate their hometown heroes — I wonder who the culprits were? Surely white supremacists, right? We hope you spent your Valentine's Day with someone special.. But instead, you're here with us, so we're gonna assume not. It's okay though.. The state of modern romance is in SHAMBLES. Let's discuss why..Also, Ian Miles Cheong.. IS DEAD? Malaysia isn't too happy with him right now, and you won't believe why..All that and more TONIGHT with one of the internet's FAVORITE LAWYERS, GOODLAWGIC! __➤ SUPPORT THE SHOW: Watch this FULL EPISODE ad free + EXCLUSIVE content at https://censored.tv/ promo code “OFFENSIVE” for 20% - Keep free speech media alive!➤ RUMBLE LINK: https://rumble.com/c/SlightlyOffensive__➤ NOTICER T-SHIRTS / MERCH: https://slightlyoffensive.com/__⇩ SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS⇩➤ FRUIT GRAVY COMPANY: At Fruit Gravy, we believe that less is more, that's why our selection of handcrafted jams and jellies are low in sugar, and free from all preservatives and dyes. If you can't pronounce it, we don't use it. Because we don't use fillers, It's all fruit inside these jars, it's just that simple. Go to https://fruitgravycompany.com and put in promo code OFFENSIVE for 25% OFF!➤ PARASITE CLEANSEWhat if I told you - there is a hostile alien species that controls your appetite, emotihttps://wons, sleep and focus - destroying your body from the inside out. PURGE SUDDENLY - Remove the parasites today! https://www.purgestore.com/ - Promocode ELIJAH for 10% OFF!➤ JOIN THE PRIVATE LIVE COMMUNITY: https://elijahschaffer.locals.com/__⇩ FOLLOW GOODLAWGIC⇩X: https://twitter.com/TheFollowingPro RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/GoodLawgic YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@GoodLawgic __⇩ELIJAH'S SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩➤ RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/SlightlyOffensive➤ INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/slightlyoffensive.tv➤ X: https://X.com/ElijahSchaffer➤ TELEGRAM https://t.me/SlightlyOffensive__➤BOOKINGS + BUSINESS INQUIRIES: MIKE@SLIGHTLYOFFENSIVE.COM__⇩EXCELLENT RESOURCES FOR KIDS ⇩Head to https://bit.ly/teach-freedom for a unique book series that introduces the important ideas that schools no longer teach.Support the show

#ChiefsParade #KansasCity #Vaush #IanMilesCheong #Malaysia #JavierMilei #Israel #SolomonsTempleSupport the showWebsite with podcast embed player, news links, latest YouTube episodes, and Rumble links: https://cosmicmarauder33.wixsite.com/the-cosmic-showCALL INTO THE SHOW AND LEAVE A MESSAGE FOR NEXT TIME! 1-505-337-0631 If you are not subscribed to the Rumble, you are missing more than HALF the show!https://rumble.com/c/CosmicRadioTwitter: LastAnalogHero @freejerry88Support Buzzsprout+ here!: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1826246/supporters/newCheck out my Locals for exclusive livestreams and podcasts!: https://thecosmicshow.locals.com/Hope is Eternal

Show Notes and Transcript New York Times bestselling author and award winning journalist Richard Poe always gives great context and depth to news stories so he returns to Hearts of Oak for a leftfield conversation concerning Britain and Africa.  Last year, Italy's Prime Minister, Georgia Meloni suddenly started denouncing French neo-colonialism, blaming them for keeping Africa poor and forcing the inhabitants to flee to Europe.  Richard asks if she is focussing in the right direction, is it not the British who are destabilising Africa through economic levers and intelligence operations?  We have seen African governments falling like dominoes with 7 coups in just three years.  What lies behind these and are they connected or just purely random? Richard Poe is a New York Times-bestselling author and award-winning journalist. He has written widely on business, science, history and politics. His books include The Shadow Party, co-written with David Horowitz; The Einstein Factor, co-written with Win Wenger; Perfect Fear: Four Tales of Terror; Black Spark, White Fire; the WAVE series of network marketing books; and many more. Richard was formerly editor of David Horowitz's FrontPageMag, contributing editor of NewsMax, senior editor of SUCCESS magazine, reporter for the New York Post, and managing editor of the East Village Eye. Connect with Richard... WEBSITE: https://www.richardpoe.com/ TWITTER: https://twitter.com/RealRichardPoe?s=20 SUBSTACK: https://richardpoe.substack.com/ BOOKS: https://amzn.eu/d/18lNMtp Interview recorded 8.9.23 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more...https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Please subscribe, like and share!   Subscribe now Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Hello, Hearts of Oak, and welcome to another interview coming up in a moment with Richard Poe, who re-joined us. He was last with us when we looked at his book, The Shadow Party, looking at George Soros and his control, power, and influence. And today we look at something completely different, and that is a thread that he put up on Twitter titled, Are the British Destabilizing Africa? And this is from a video that Giorgia Meloni, the Italian PM, put up denouncing French neo-colonialism and I often think well the Brits did good in Africa but maybe the French and the Belgians and the Germans and they were a bit naughty. But Richard brings his deep understanding, his delves deep into this subject and, exposes maybe why that thinking is not necessarily correct, how the British have been closely involved, look an economic side of it but also the intelligence services and how they operate and look in some of the recent coups, maybe what lies behind that a little bit. So much to pack into this huge subject. Richard Poe, it is wonderful to have you back with us again. Thank you so much for joining us again today. (Richard Poe) Thanks, Peter, it's great to be here.  Great, and we're going to go through quite a bit. Just before we jump in, I'll just say to the viewers, that Richard is well worth following because his tweets actually bring something quite different. Bring the historical side to a lot of what happens and I think the conservatives movement can often be guilty of kind of in your face what's happened that morning and by the afternoon it's old news and just for our viewers and listeners I think Richard brings context often to stories that are happening but whenever Richard is last on we look through his book The Shadow Party. How George Soros, Hillary Clinton and the 60s radicals seize control of the Democratic Party. That is in the description for you to go back and have a look at and delve deeper into that topic. But he is a bestseller on many other books but that's what we stuck on and of course former editor of Front Page Magazine and we've had David Horowitz on with us before. But Richard there, people can obviously find you @RealRichardPoe, richardpoe.com, the website, and Richard Poe on Substack. Everything is in there for the viewer and listeners to take advantage of. Richard, one tweet that caught my eye, and we will delve a little bit into that, is on Africa and the Brits. And as much as I like blaming the French for everything as a Brit, that is our national pastime, sometimes the British have been at fault over history for a few things. If it hasn't been the French, it's probably been the Brits or the Belgians maybe. But there was a statement I think by Georgia Meloni, the Premier of Italy, and she had started denouncing French neo-colonialism and you had put up about the British destabilizing Africa. Do you want to maybe just begin with that and set out why we can't point the fingers solely at the French? Right. Well, basically, I knew something about, let's call it the neo-colonial infrastructure of Africa, because I was actually hired by a think tank, oh, more than 10 years ago to do a paper on that subject. And for various reasons, it was never published, but it was extremely eye-opening. What I basically discovered, to my astonishment, was that the EU, and in particular Great Britain, France as well, but really Great Britain more than anyone else, had essentially continued their colonial relationship beyond the date when these various African countries supposedly became independent, that what they actually did, they being the various European colonial powers, is they simply set up alternate structures through various kinds of diplomatic channels and the UN system as it was being set up. So that the UN today. Really is a neo-colonial structure. And that's really what I discovered in this research, which again, never saw the light of day. A topic I may write about someday in my memoirs. But so I had studied this in some detail, these NGOs and international treaties and such that had been set up for the very purpose of making sure that those European countries which had formerly owned colonies in Africa continued to maintain that relationship. So specifically the Anglophone colonies that were English speaking, maintained their relationship with Great Britain. The Francophone colonies maintained their relationship with France and so on. And in the 1957 Treaty of Rome, establishing the European Economic Commission, or community. This relationship was actually formalized, whereas the countries which had been former colonies, and I think the way they put it in the treaty, they didn't call them colonies, but they said countries in Africa having a special relationship to members of the EEC, would have a certain kind of membership in the EEC. I think they were called associated members. And they would have a special diplomatic and economic relationship with the EEC, trade privileges and so forth. So maybe because I researched this so deeply, I don't want to bore your viewers with so many details, but the bottom line is, so in the last few weeks on Twitter, we've suddenly seen an uproar from, especially from certain influencers with these coups that have been happening in Africa. In particular, there have been six coups in three years. In a number of countries, most of which are former French colonies. In fact, all of which are former French colonies except Sudan, and the cry has gone out that at last the freedom-loving people of Africa are getting on their feet and overthrowing the yoke of French colonialism. This map has been getting wide circulation and all this enthusiasm from people on Twitter about overthrowing French colonialism. So I thought this was remarkable for a couple of different reasons. First of all, I thought French colonialism was overthrown a long time ago, or at least that's the official story. I remember as a kid, you know, in the 1960s, that was the big thing. The end of colonialism. It's all over. And, you know, these nationalist leaders in Africa who had become, you know, the first presidents of the newly independent countries. These were big pop culture heroes in the 60s. And so now so many decades later to say, finally at last French colonialism is being overthrown. So on the one hand I thought that was interesting because it broke with the pop culture narrative that we were all brought up with that colonialism ended decades ago. All of a sudden it's here, it's now, and it's being overthrown in the year 2023. But the other thing that caught my attention is that they were specifically referring to French colonialism, when in fact there were several colonial powers, in Africa. There was Great Britain, France, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Germany, the list goes on. And in the case of Italy and Germany, their colonies were taken away because of world wars. But still, there were several colonial powers that remained, which still considered themselves officially, quote unquote, responsible for their former colonies, which meant, especially in the case of France, that they would intervene militarily in those countries when they felt there was some need to do so. And the French in particular have done this probably more than any other quote unquote former colonial power, but the British do it too. They just have a more subtle way of doing it. And so this is what I discovered that think tank research had done more than 10 years ago. So that was the second reason that I was, or the third reason that I was surprised by this sudden enthusiasm for throwing off the yoke of French colonialism, because I knew that in fact there was such a thing as French colonialism, and there was in fact such a thing as EU colonialism. The EU itself as a bureaucratic entity has directly involved itself in the management and admin of the African continent. And so I knew all these things, but most people don't. And it just was surprising to me to suddenly see this acknowledgment of that colonial relationship which in the past had been very controversial and hushed up and denied. Can I ask, because I've been reading a book on tax havens and delving into that world, understanding about money flows, and the book basically starts with the French, takes Gabon as an example of how the French set up the president there, and the coup has supposedly removed his son Ali Bongo and they use this as an example of how the French control large parts of Africa and I read that as a Brit thinking you see France have been really bad we're actually Africa should be thanking the Brits for what we've done for education roads and is is that a very simplistic view of Africa.  Well, when you say simplistic you mean the view that Africa was actually better off under colonialism?  Yes, because I know I've seen stuff and I've seen even you retweeted the thought that actually what Africa needs is for those colonial powers to go back and to fix it once again. That obviously would not be a popular view in many parts of Africa with the whole conversation about payments, colonial payments, repatriations, all of that. But my simplistic view is, well, Britain could actually fix that, build a few more roads, a few more hospitals, a few more schools, and life would be good again. Is that view extremely simplistic? Well, I would simply have to confess that I don't know, in answer to that question. The fact is, what I'm learning now, excuse me, the research that I'm doing now about the American Revolution and the economic and financial reasons for, the reasons why our founding fathers wanted independence from England in the first place, I'm really learning a lot about the colonial system and how it works. And you know, there are people in America who say essentially the same thing. We're not quite in as bad of a fix as Africa yet, although we seem to be headed that direction pretty quickly. There are people in America who are monarchists and who are questioning whether we were better off under the British, as strange as that might seem to you. And you're seeing that more and more. I think it's being pushed a little bit on social media in some quarters as a kind of PSYOP, and the fact is, you really have to dig to some extent to try to figure out, you know, why did the founding fathers feel so strongly that they needed to get away from England? And there actually were some really compelling reasons, most of which had to do with an extremely oppressive economic system that was enforced by law, in particular by the so-called Navigation Act, whose effect was basically to keep the colonies by force of law in a situation where we had to produce raw materials, food, crops, tobacco, cotton, things like that, and to sell them very cheaply in England and then to get all of our manufacturers from England, where they were beginning to have their industrial revolution and we had to buy them more expensively. And this is the heart and soul of the colonial relationship. The colony produces raw materials and food and sells them to the, very cheaply. The mother country then sells us, the colony, everything that we need in terms of manufactured goods, but they sell them quite expensively. And so there is a permanently enforced balance of trade, which is wildly disadvantageous to the colonized state. And this system is enforced by local corruption, because in order to make such a system work, you have to get local people to support the colonial relationship, and you make them very, very rich, but at the expense of the majority of people. And the best illustration for that in the United States is the pre-Civil War South, the Antebellum South, where you had a cotton-producing economy, which was almost entirely run for Britain. Almost all the cotton was sold, I think more than 80 percent, was sold to Great Britain, which was, of course, at that time the leading producer of cotton textiles in the world. And so some people, like our little Harris family in Gone with the Wind, got very, very rich selling cotton to England. But the way they did it was by enslaving people and making them work for free as slaves. And it was argued at the time of the American Civil War and in the years leading up to it that this colonial system, that essentially the American South had been recolonized by England and that slavery was the result of that. This was argued by certain economists at the time who were sympathetic to the Northern position. They were saying that the institution of slavery in the South was a direct result of the elite southern planters whose livelihood depended on Great Britain, on trading with them. Always having to try to please their British buyers by keeping the price low because the British did have other places where they could go. They were constantly trying to develop other sources of high-quality cotton in Brazil, in India, in Egypt, in other places. And so the southern planters who were what modern scholars would call a colonial elite, they were a small portion of the population who enforced essentially a British colonial system because it made them rich personally, but it was at the cost of everyone else, where the black slaves and the poor whites as well, essentially there wasn't much left for them at the end. And they weren't allowed to develop an industrial economy because that's not what the British wanted. They wanted the South to remain an agrarian society that devoted itself to selling cotton. So this situation actually led directly to the American Civil War, which was the most terrible episode in our history. And I wrote an article about this called How the British caused the American Civil War. What happened is the North started to, trying to impose tariffs on overseas trade for the specific purpose of discouraging the southern planters from selling to England and the British did what they do when their colonial interests are threatened. They sent in their secret agents and their provocateurs and one in particular named Thomas Cooper, who was a British, apparently, intelligence agent. He had first gotten his start going to France and helping to stir up the French Revolution. Then he moved to South Carolina. He became a very prominent, respected person. He was a judge. And in 1828, he delivered a speech calling for secession of the South. And this speech is widely recognized by historians as having been the beginning of the Southern secession movement. So because of that and various other manoeuvres, including material assistance, which Great Britain gave to the South during the Civil War. It is very clear and in fact undeniable, although it's been scrubbed pretty much from our history books. It is undeniable that Great Britain caused and instigated the American Civil War and did everything in their power to help the South win. And you can see British newspapers and political speeches by British statesmen. There was no question that they were on the side of the South and they wanted the South to win and they tried very hard to intervene, including having the French put a very large army into Mexico, putting a lot of British troops into Canada. So, what I'm saying by this, Peter, is that when you look behind the scenes, when you look at the surface, you might think that colonialism, or British colonialism, is seemingly benign, and that it actually helps people who are in a lower phase of development to develop infrastructure and trade and education and health and all these things, that it brings in money, it brings in expertise, and all of that. But when you look a a little deeper, you realize that the intention of the colonializers or the colonizers, whatever. Is not fundamentally a good intention. That what they want is to set up economic relationships that are actually disadvantageous to the colonized country in the long run. And to maintain those relationships, even if it means tearing apart a country in civil war, and in our case a country of people of European and British and Irish stock, especially at that time. It wasn't even a matter of race, you know. It's just when those economic interests are threatened, the colonizing power becomes very ruthless and the colonial elites become loyal to a foreign country instead of to their own country, which is what happened in our South. So, on the one hand, yes, I would agree that this question of were certain parts of the world under colonialism, I don't want to answer with a knee-jerk response to say, oh, out with the colonizers, it's racist, it's sexist, it's homophobic, it's whatever. Yeah, I just threw in homophobic just for the heck of it. Actually, I don't even say that. But I mean, what I'm saying is I hear what you're saying, I hear your question and I absolutely don't go with the knee jerk. Woke or politically correct, autumn idea that colonialism was totally bad. I don't go with it. I think it's a complicated question. But I also think that my research into the colonial past of my own country, the United States shows that our relationship with England was in fact terribly damaging to our country. Even though there were good aspects to it as well, because our own industrialization of the building of the Great American Railroads, all of that was funded by British capital. So it's two sides of the same coin. But if you have a foreign country meddling in your affairs and doing things like causing secessions and civil wars, that's a very serious matter. So what would, what would Africa really be like? The narrative now is, well, look, it's in a hopeless condition. The dictators, genocides, wars, constant military coups, and so forth. And if the colonizing powers came back, maybe everything would be better and nicer. But it's not always in the interests of the colonizing powers to make everything nicer and better. And I guess that's what I'm saying. And I also would raise the question as to what extent, these troubles that we're having today are actually caused by covert interference, by the West and by the former colonial powers. And, I think in this case that we're talking about now with these former French colonies, there's some kind of psy-op going on where, for reasons, let's say reasons unknown. Whoever controls the political discourse on Twitter is pretending to be all excited about these military coups and pretending that it all has to do with some mass movement from the ground level of people who want to throw off the yoke of French colonialism. But the fact is, first of all, these countries, most of them have had many, many coups. It's not at all unusual. They're showing this map, they're saying, oh my gosh, six coups in three years. That's actually not so unusual, for those countries or others in Africa. And the other thing that's kind of weird about it is, are these really French colonies or former French colonies, or are they just nominally French colonies and actually some other countries among whom is Great Britain are actually calling the shots there. And so it gets into this, and so I guess on one level I'm saying yes it is it is simplistic if we assume that whatever the news tells us is correct that once upon a time there was colonial Africa then the colonial powers all left for some unstated reason, which is never really adequately explained. And then supposedly these African countries were on their own and then supposedly all hell broke loose and they all started killing and massacring each other. I think it probably is a little naïve to accept that narrative at face value. I am not at all convinced that that's exactly what happened. And what instead appears to have happened is that the old colonial system was replaced by a new colonial system, basically run by the United Nations system, and that these disorders were allowed to go on. And in fact, in some cases, encouraged to go on for all kinds of reasons. I'll give you one example.  Yeah, give me an example and then I'll bring up another piece you had up, so go with your example. One famous example, of course, was the Rwandan genocide in 1994, where now Rwanda was a French colony and, in fact, while the genocide was happening, there were French troops there who were supposedly trying to stop it, and they were very sharply criticized for being strangely ineffective in not being able to stop it, especially since they were modern troops with modern weaponry and these people who were committing the genocide were supposedly armed with only machetes. So there were questions about the French handling of it. But even beyond that, the result of this genocide was that Rwanda, was subsequently taken into the British Commonwealth. Whereas before it had been in the French sphere of influence. And the normal traditional rule of the Commonwealth is that countries who are admitted to it are supposed to be former British colonies, but Rwanda wasn't. It was taken as a special case because the French had supposedly done such a terrible job of not protecting their people that it passed into the proprietorship of Great Britain. And so, I'm not the only person who has to raise an eyebrow and ask the question, qui bono? I mean, if Rwanda passed from French control to British control, and if the pretext for that passage, was the Rwanda genocide, would it be out of line to ask, what caused the genocide in the first place? And to what extent was it possibly even instigated by some foreign power, as was the American Civil War, as we're now learning more than 150 years after the fact. So that's one example. I could give others, but you said you had a point you wanted to make. Well, because you obviously, in a lot of the information you put out, you're talking about the intelligence services of the West and how they work behind the scenes. But then also there's the economic side. And this was, this is kind of the article I was touching on, let me bring up, this was a Daily Mail article, Recolonize Africa. And you said that it seems to be saying, and this is an old article, 2005, but it gives historical context once again, says it appears to say that Africa's become so violent and lawless that most African countries will welcome, kind of the West, colonial powers coming back in again. But then you mentioned the kind of colonial economic side, I think, when you look at the EU and how the EU keeps a lot of the countries poor through their tax and tariff systems is, yeah. I'm wondering where does, again, the fault lies at the economic side? Is it still the intelligence services working very much within those countries? Is it a mixture of those two? Yeah, what are your thoughts on that?  Well, I would go so far as to say that I don't believe that the colonial powers of Europe specifically, ever let go of their colonies, especially France and Britain. I think they simply found a different way to administer them and actually a cheaper and more efficient way where they didn't have to physically occupy these countries anymore and they didn't have to be held responsible for things like mass murders and genocides and coups and so forth, that they could have a more rough and ready kind of environment and they didn't have to worry about looking good in the face of world opinion. So in some ways it's actually a better situation for them than the situation they had before where they really had to make everything look good because their flag was flying over these various countries and if they committed terrible atrocities or allowed atrocities to be committed there would be consequences. Other European countries would criticize them and would take advantage. And we see that, for example, in the ruckus that the British propagandists made at the turn of the century over the Belgian Congo, where terrible atrocities were committed by King Leopold II in the push to harvest rubber, and he basically enslaved the whole people of the Congo and subjected them to terrible, inhumane practices. And the British, for their own reasons, made a huge, big deal about that. This was back in the turn of the century, of the 20th century, in the 1900s. And they made a huge ruckus about it and said, oh, how terrible, look how badly he's treating these people. The part of that story you never hear about is that the British themselves, British interests were heavily involved in the rubber trade in the Belgian Congo and were taking part in all of it. That part is never mentioned. Likewise, there was a similar ruckus in Peru, again over rubber harvesting. Now Peru was officially never anyone's colony since its independence from Spain, but in fact a lot of people don't know that the British basically exercised an informal control of Peru and some say that they still do to this day. And there was another big public relations ruckus over cruelties related to the rubber trade in Peru, which again British missionaries and human rights activists were leading. And it was somehow effectively concealed that the British themselves were deeply involved in committing these atrocities. So it's really a world of smoke and mirrors, where propaganda and psychological operations have really been part of the whole toolkit of colonialism really since the very beginning, and I believe that the reason the British became the greatest and most successful colonizers in the world is specifically because they are the best propagandists and the best at psychological operations. They basically invented modern psyops, and they're the very best in that field to this day, and that's really what it's all about. It's all about how to do things in foreign countries without seeming to be doing them, or to blame other people for doing them, such as blaming King Leopold II of Belgium for all these atrocities, and he certainly was guilty of them, but leaving out the part that British financial interests were in there very heavily, helping him to commit them. So this continues to go on today, where we have now a very fluid situation, a neo-colonial situation, as the left, as the Marxists named it decades ago, where the colonial colonizing countries are still there, and they're still probably just as much in control as ever were, but no longer held responsible to keep order in the same way they used to be. So it's really kind of a better situation for them. They can get away with a lot more. Now in these, the interesting thing in that article by Andrew Roberts, the British historian, he wrote that article in 2005. A lot of people in our, as you pointed out, in our social media culture think 2005 was, you know, like the last millennium or something. But actually, it's very important to understand what was happening then because, what actually happened is that the EU was in the process then of setting up an elaborate neo-colonial structure which basically controls Africa to this day. And now I mentioned that in the original treaty of Rome setting up the EEC back in 1957, they already had a formal relationship with past and present colonies in Africa which they recognized in that treaty. They call it a special relationship. And in the 1990s, some strange things started to happen. Which is that as the EU became activated and the Maastricht Treaty and the Eurozone, and it started becoming a reality, this thing that people have been talking about since the 1890s and before, It started becoming a reality in the 90s and immediately the cry went up to form an African union. And there was a strategy developed called the Joint EU Africa Strategy. And the motto of this EU Africa group was one Europe, one Africa. And what they wanted was a United Europe dealing one-on-one with the United Africa. So they wouldn't, that is so the European countries would not have to negotiate separately with each little country in Africa. They would have one authority controlling the entire continent with whom they could make their deals and their treaties, whatever those were. So interestingly, Muammar Gaddafi, the late dictator or president of Libya. He came out in, I forget what year it was. It could have been, it was around 19, in the late 1990s, I think. He made a very controversial speech in Libya where he said that the Arab Maghreb Union was a farce. That now the Maghreb is basically all of North Africa except Egypt. And in 1989, I think they had come together to form a regional economic structure called the Arab Maghreb Union. And Gaddafi had been one of the leading people pushing that. It was actually his brainchild, supposedly. But then, I think it was 15 years later, he gave this speech saying, let me tell you the truth. The reason we formed this Maghreb Union was because the EU forced us to do it. They said, we're not going to do business with you anymore because it's too burdensome dealing with each country unless you, unless all the Maghreb countries of North Africa come together in a union, we're not going to even talk to you. So on that basis, Gaddafi got up in circa 1989, and using the language of third world-ism and the non-aligned movement and Arab nationalism. Said that what we need to do is form this union so we can all be strong, all us Arab-speaking countries in Africa together. But then 15 years later, he openly and publicly confessed actually the EU is the one who wanted us to get together, had nothing to do with Arab nationalism, and they basically forced us to do it. And so then he said, let's dissolve this union, let's get out of it. Oh, it was in 2003, I just remembered. It was in 2003, so this was post 9-1-1, it was after Afghanistan and Iraq had been invaded, so things weren't looking too good for Arab nationalism at that moment. And so Gaddafi, getting with the spirit of the time, said the Arabs are finished, they're a laughingstock, and we want nothing to do with Arabs anymore, even though we're Arab speaking. We are now African. And then he came up with a new idea. Let's have an African union, he said. Now, actually, he had already proposed the African Union. It came into being in the year 2000, and supposedly Gaddafi was the one who thought of it and was the founding father of this African Union. But, you know, in 2003, he confessed that the last time he pulled that manoeuvre with the Arab Maghreb Union, it was the EU forcing him to do it. Should we imagine that on the second go-round with the African, that he suddenly became the third world Nationalist that he always claimed to be or was he simply like Scarlett O'Hara and all those southern planters in the United States in the antebellum South, was he simply, lining his own pockets by doing business with the colonizers and going where he thought the power was. Well, it looks like the latter. And that's how colonial elites work. You know, people are not that idealistic, unfortunately. I wish they were, but let's face it, they're not. You know, people will go where the money is, and that's just how it is. And so they formed this African Union to the cries from the EU of one Europe, one Africa, And they started signing all kinds of treaties and putting forth all kinds of policies that were completely mysterious and unknown to the African people who have enough of a struggle trying to get democratic government as it is. But now all of a sudden, whatever democratic structures had been set up at a national level in the individual countries had suddenly become obsolete because now the EU was talking directly to these officials in charge of this thing called the African Union. And the African Union was empowered to make treaties that could be enforced on all African countries. Imagine that. So, now that we've had the African Union since the year 2000. And one of its rules, supposedly, is that you're supposed to have free elections which are monitored by international authorities and absolutely no military coups. Military coups are strictly not allowed. And yet, since then, we've had the Arab Spring. These colour revolutions and civil wars in the Western powers, and now we're having these, continuing to have these coups, which everybody is cheering about on Twitter. All of this is supposedly, supposed to be impossible and illegal under the African Union and should trigger military interventions by the African Union. I think they call it the African Union Peace and Security, something or other, which basically mobilizes peacekeeping troops and also arranges to have European troops to come in, in order to fix problems, whatever they are. And so the mechanism actually exists in Africa probably better than anywhere else in the world where you have a transnational authority, the African Union, which actually has the real power and the real willingness to bring in heavy military force whenever they like, to stop things like military coups from happening, and yet they're still happening. Why is that? Why is that? I'll pick up on one thing as we finish. Realizing the Gaddafi started African Union changes my whole concept of it. That blows me away. But the fact that when you look at the EU, the EU, European Union, has been hugely successful at control within Europe economically. There are lots of questions that the EU has never been able to rise above and be a economic bloc, I guess, to rival the US, which was always the dream, probably, of the EU and the European Economic Community before that. But it's full control of EU members and if the EU can punish and has done with those in Eastern Europe for many violations on tax, on faith, on immigration. But the African Union, you don't hear of it as having that much say or power. It hasn't brought together those countries. Can we just finish just maybe touching on that, that kind of comparison between one bloc in Europe that has worked certainly for control, the African Union, is that by design or are there other reasons behind that? Well, I think it's by design that the African Union is weak. Is that what you're saying? That it really doesn't exercise the authority it's supposed to. I think it's by design. I think it's doing exactly what it's supposed to do, which is to create a central authority for European powers, especially Great Britain, which really masterminded the whole thing, in my opinion. And if you, I would just like to leave your audience with one point, which, is that article you showed by Andrew Roberts, where he said it's time to to recolonize Africa. That was in 2005. That was right after Tony Blair had done his African, Africa commission and they had mapped out this whole plan for basically re-colonizing Africa through the African Union and through other regional structures. Now in that article, Andrews actually says, he actually states that the French and the Germans will not be allowed to re-colonize Africa, that only English speaking countries. He actually says the United States and Great Britain, and with the support of New Zealand, Canada, and Australia, will be the ones to make this happen. The French, because of their cruelty in the past and their mishandling of all kinds of colonial situations, will not be allowed to have anything to do with it, nor will the Germans, because look what they did when they were colonialists back before World War I. You think 2005 was a long, long time ago, but he, Roberts actually evoked what the Germans did before World War I as a reason why they will not be allowed to take part in this great project of colonizing Africa. So now all of a sudden we're getting all this propaganda from Giorgia Meloni of Italy and from big influencers like Ian Miles Cheong. I don't mean to single him out, but he wrote this extraordinary tweet saying, yes, the people of West Africa are rising up against French colonialism. We're going towards a multipolar world. Hooray. Some words to that effect. He linked it to the whole idea of multi-polarism. And what is that all about? That's about overthrowing the global hegemon, the USA, which is supposedly the cause of all evil in the world. Overthrowing the USA, stripping us of our power, so then power can be decentralized among various countries. And so certain influencers such as Ian Miles Cheong is out there celebrating and saying, yes, out with the French, out with the French. Is it just a coincidence that Andrew Roberts, when he first publicized this recolonization plan, he expressly said the French are out. We will not allow the French to take part in this now, all of a sudden, so many years later we're hearing that cry again that the French are out. And some of these French countries, French colonies, so-called, one of them Guinea, maybe on another, we don't have time to talk about it now, but I have massive evidence that the British are really effectively in control in that country, Guinea, and running things in an extraordinary way, quite openly, including Rio Tinto, the mining company, the Anglo-Australian mining company, and Guinea has more than one half of the world's bauxite deposits, aluminium ore. And Rio Tinto has been trying to get in control of that, working with the Chinese. And it's interesting that, you know, the cry goes out, you know, from all the usual sources, the US State Department and what have you, oh the Chinese are taking over in Africa, that's one of the reasons why we have to go back in there and otherwise the Chinese are going to take over everything. But I notice whenever the British get involved with something, they somehow bring the Chinese with them. I'm not sure why they do that, but it's a little strange, what can I say? Well, we'll leave it on a cliff-hanger, that, about the British involvement there, and we'll pick up on that. Richard, I really do appreciate coming on. As I said at the beginning, I love reading your tweets and how you expand on so much. So thank you for joining us today and going through that Africa tweet, which is one of your latest ones. Thank you for your time. Thank you, Peter. Always a pleasure.

SEASON 2 EPISODE 30: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: It's BACK. Asked at his disbarment hearing in California about his December 2020 email to Boris Epshteyn referring to Mike Pence OR CHUCK GRASSLEY presiding over the January 6 Electoral College Vote count and certification, John Eastman said he couldn't answer because of attorney-client privilege. Asked WHICH client, he answered "President Trump." And so it reignites. It is the Dracula of January 6 Coup Conspiracy threads. Each time it seems like it's been discredited, something like this arises. Now it's Eastman reigniting the belief that his email, and Grassley's bizarre statements on January 5 that they didn't expect Pence to preside, and Pence's refusal to get into the Secret Service vehicle during the coup, are all connected. And Grassley once again has changed his story. I'll review the whole saga and I'll predict: if somebody breaks John Eastman, they'll get the truth. So let's break him! Might be Fani Willis. She has now replied to Jim Jordan's fishing expedition with everything this side of an indictment of Jordan. The highlights are wonderful. Then there's Peter Navarro's conviction and the reappearance of Sign Woman to torture the pint-sized fascist. Roger Stone reveals he has no idea what would happen during a nuclear war. A self-identifying Air Force vet confronts Ron DeSantis about the Dollar Store slaughter and Ron and his aide and his dubious Surgeon General overreact so much it's clear they know the mass shooting was DeSantis's fault. And we have to strip Elon Musk of his security clearance and all government contracts; a Russian propagandist goaded him into shutting off the satellite phone system he gave the Ukrainians when Ukraine needed it the most. Musk feared it would precipitate a "Mini-Pearl Harbor." Or, did he say "Minnie Pearl Harbor?" And that new CNN poll that's so dire for President Biden? Small detail. They polled 900 Republicans and only 600 non-Republicans. B-Block (25:40) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Mike Buckner, explorer, who says tomorrow he will prove the earth is flat and what we think is the horizon of a globe is actually "The Great Ice Wall." CNN Politics thinks I'm-All-Ears Tuberville doing China's bidding by hamstringing the US military is a "Dispute between Tuberville and Democrats." And disgraced Conservative Steven Crowder takes out an ad offering a laugh and based on the allegations he repeatedly exposed himself to men, I think we know what the laugh is. C-Block (31:00) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: Ever heard one of those stories of the guy who happens to run into the automobile manufacturer early in the 20th Century? And the businessman is just merging together a bunch of small firms and he needs a name for the new big one and the stranger says "How about General Motors?" The story is true - and it's about my great grandfather.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.blockedandreported.orgThis week on the Premium edition of Blocked and Reported, Jesse tells Katie about an allegedly racist Juneteenth party in Rochester, New York, and the allegedly racist racists who threw it. Plus, alleged Oxford alum Ian Miles Cheong has some thoughts on body hair. To support the show and get exta content and much more, become a Primo

Tomi Lahren breaks down what happened to the Colorado student who had a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack and more with cultural commentator, Ian Miles Cheong. The climate protesters are out in full force, climate expert Alex Epstein joins to debunk the latest news. Gavin Newsom's California is funneling millions in taxpayer dollars into a nonprofit that pushes “invent your own gender” ideology on school children, Tomi gives her Final Thoughts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Flakko grills UK viral prankster Mizzy about all the headlines and recent controversies he's been a part of. ----- 00:00 Intro 00:35 Mizzy never removes his head wrap, Flakko asks him to 01:35 Mizzy reacts to the latest headlines, says he laughs at people being offended by his pranks 03:02 Mizzy started on social media at 8 y/o and started pranks at 11 y/o 05:43 Flakko says pranks get people k*lled over here, laws are different in the UK 06:10 Walking into someone's house is not a big deal, a civil offense, unless you have intent to rob 07:40 Flakko says prankster who knows the law is dangerous 08:46 Mizz breaks down the whole viral video where he walked in that house for a prank, he did apologize off camera the next day or so 10:15 Mizzy has an 8-month-old baby 11:01Having a child made him go harder to make content, he got kicked out from his baby mom's house 13:11 That same night he heard about the search warrant on him 14:30 Getting banned on Youtube but somehow still trending on Twitter 15:26 Mizzy wants to do a celebrity boxing match, and grow his Twitter, IG and Twitch 17:00 Mizzy on the Andre Walker show was absolutely wild, and Mizzy defended himself, Andre was fake nice at first and then went for the viral moment 20:38 Mizzy asked Andrew and Tristan Tate for advice on writing his speech, they're kinda like mentors 22:05 Mizzy kept on doing crazier pranks 22:55 Mizzy apologized for his pranks but people still hate on him, he says it's straight rac*sm 24:28 Flakko says Johny Somali is the new Mizzy doing the same pranks 25:56 UK Twitter is on Mizzy's a** and uses his name to attack all immigrants 28:55 Police brutality in the UK, people think less of it because they do not have guns, but they would still tase or beat you up 29:49 Mizzy is back on good terms with his mom, his dad is in Jamaica due to his mom 31:47 Mizzy's dad always asks him for money 34:30 Mizzy is focused on work and doesn't really talk to girls like that 35:13 Mizzy says he was never with the baby mom, she kept the kid for clout, it was a one-time thing 37:23 Flakko asks Mizzy about his relationship with Skits his close friend on every video, he also has a wild reputation 40:21 Flakko tries to break down what the matrix is 42:50 Linking up with Jidion, Sneako, Zherka and other creators 44:35 Mizzy is planning on making money with content and music 45:35 Andrew Tate showing Mizzy the ropes to make money 47:27 Celebrity boxing match, Flakko says he would love to see him vs Salt Papi but he's not physically ready, so maybe Speed, Flakko says Corn is weak 50:21 The Pierce Morgan interview, Mizzy says he was biased and vindictive, they actually want him to come back for clout and a viral moment like they did with Bhad Bhabie 54:13 This interview still helped him overall 55:02 Flakko brings up Ian Miles Cheong, who is allegedly responsible for Mizzy getting backlash 57:13 Stormzy reached out to Mizzy to offer his help 1:01:11 Mizzy is not a gang member whatsoever, people say that coz he's black 1:06:15 Mizzy wants to get into reality TV, keep pushing his music and podcasts ----- NO JUMPER PATREON http://www.patreon.com/nojumper Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gay Fox News Contributor  Tammy Bruce Blasts Corporate Pride Campaigns: ‘Really Do Damage to Gay and Lesbian Community'. LA Dodgers now promote 'Christian Faith and Family Day,' even as  controversy regarding anti-Christian drag queens lingers: 'We are grateful for the opportunity to talk about Jesus' Why are companies committing corporate suicide to promote transgenderism? Bud Light sponsors Cincinnati Pride Parade after Dylan Mulvaney controversy Target gave $2.1M to LGBTQ group that urges schools to hide kids' gender transitions from parents Target and the LA Dodgers put Budweiser to shame tammy bruce,Cincinnati Pride Parade,GLSEN, sam briton, DAILY NEWS, LIBERTARIAN, INDEPENDENT NEWS, COMMENTARY, DAILY, Christine Anderson, Josh Alexander, Bibles, Lauren Chen, Benny Johnson, Tucker Carlson, Ian Miles Cheong, @clownworld, Jesse Kelly,zero-bail, sian longthorpe,rolling stone, Walmart boycott, bishop barro, Melissa McCarthy,brian Cornell,elon musk,

Jake on the News 5/26/2023 Now Walmart gets the Bud Light treatment over drag queen Pride books as outraged consumers vow to take it down 'next' after boycotting Target and North Face   Activists Gear Up for ‘Terrifying' Pride Month As Threats Increase, Brands Drop Out Far-right groups and aggressive social media campaigns targeting LGBTQ communities have organizers worried as June approaches   EXCLUSIVE Revealed: Transgender athlete who 'smashed to smithereens' women's Parkrun record by a minute and 13 seconds was married man until four years ago - as row rages over national event's self-ID gender rules Siân Longthorpe, 43, completed the Porthcawl Parkrun in record a 18m 53s Wallowa County, Oregon, is in the throes of one of the most narrow, nail-biting elections in the region's history. Right now the count is still ongoing for a ballot measure that would require the northeastern Oregon county's elected officials to seriously discuss the possibility of seceding from the state and joining Idaho.   34 percent of Black Americans say Biden's policies have helped them: survey   Teachers' Union Told LA Dodgers Students Could Die If Drag Queen Nuns Weren't Re-Invited to Pride Night  Bishop Barron calls for Dodgers boycott, citing team's support of anti-Catholic drag queen group Parents Take School Board to Court for Assigning LGBTQ Books Without Their Consent   High School Teacher Asked To Resign After Writing Students Up For Cheating, Stealing & Sleeping In Class   ‘'She's Going to Win She's a Man'': Track Star Opens Up on Upsetting Remarks After Victory   Target Reportedly Loses $9B In A Week Following Backlash Over LGBTQ ‘Tuck-Friendly' Pride Collection   Melissa McCarthy Has a Message for Conservatives Against Drag   The CEO of Target Brian Cornell was asked about the backlash to woke capitalism last week, and his answer does not reflect the moves Target has made this week. He called woke campaigns “good business decisions,” that they're “the right thing to do for society” and mentioned that it was helping drive sales.     DAILY NEWS, LIBERTARIAN, INDEPENDENT NEWS, COMMENTARY, DAILY, Christine Anderson, Josh Alexander, Bibles, Lauren Chen, Benny Johnson, Tucker Carlson, Ian Miles Cheong, @clownworld, Jesse Kelly,zero-bail, sian longthorpe,rolling stone, Walmart boycott, bishop barro, Melissa McCarthy,brian Cornell,elon musk,

The Vigilant Fox

GUEST OVERVIEW: Ian Miles Cheong is a Malaysian gaming journalist and right-wing political commentator. He is known for his commentary on United States politics, particularly his support of Donald Trump.

It seems that we're DOOMED because we've accepted a reality in our cities that just doesn't need to be like this as the culture battles focus on Bud Light, so much more is happening around the world that should let us know that bad things are COMING, but can we prepare for the inevitable? My guest, Ian Miles Cheong, gives a global perspective from the outside looking in on how the world is operating and what's next for humanity. Plus all the funny and crazy videos you love!________________________________________________________________Don't forget that we are fully independent and you can get this episode early & support Indp media directly at https://elijahschaffer.locals.com________________________________________________________________⇩FOLLOW IAN ⇩https://www.youtube.com/@catchupfeedhttps://twitter.com/stillgray________________________________________________________________⇩ SUPPORT THE SPONSOR ⇩PIXOTINE: Get these amazing "No-Mess" nicotine toothpicks in amazing flavors right now 20% off when you visit https://pixotine.com/elijah. Try them all or buy some for a friend, they'll thank you later because they're are basically no restrictions on where you can use them! Be 21 or older to check them outUNDERTAC: Get the best pair of boxers in America that are breathable, don't ride up, and last the test of time. Plus, they are battle forces tested. http://www.undertac.com/ for 20% off with the offer code OFFENSIVE20. Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.FAST GROWING TREES: Join the over 1.5 million satisfied customers already enjoying their trees/plants/shrubs from Fast Growing Trees! Plus get all the support you need to make sure your plants grow strong and tell. Get ahead of the Spring time and get 15% right now at https://fastgrowingtrees.com/so________________________________________________________________⇩ GET MERCH HERE ⇩WEBSITE: https://slightlyoffensive.com________________________________________________________________⇩ DOWNLOAD AUDIO PODCAST & GIVE A 5 STAR RATING! ⇩APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/slightly-offens-ve-uncut/id1450057169SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7jbVobnHs7q8pSRCtPmC41?si=qnIgUqbySSGdJEngV-P5Bg(also available Google Podcasts & wherever else podcasts are streamed)______________________________________________________________➤BOOKINGS: BOOKINGS@SLIGHTLYOFFENSIVE.COM➤BUSINESS INQUIRIES: ELIJAH@SLIGHTLYOFFENSIVE.COM_________________________________________________________________⇩ SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩➤ INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/slightlyoffensive.tv➤ TWITTER: https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer➤ TELEGRAM https://t.me/SlightlyOffensive_________________________________________________________________The Idea Of A Free Society...For Kids!Head to https://bit.ly/teach-freedom for a unique book series that introduces the important ideas that schools no longer teach.Support the show

I'm afraid that Canada is now the most dangerous place in the world for freedom of speech. Look at this insane press conference just this week, from the provincial legislature in Ontario https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1643578610098356232 In case you missed it, she wants massive fines and even jail for being merely “offensive remarks” or “protests”. You probably didn't notice it, but I called her a "she", instead of "they-them." So I just broke her proposed law, right there. I misgendered her. That's “offensive” to her. It's pretty clear that she is offended all the time. You could say she is offended for a living. But there is no human right not to be offended. That's a counterfeit human right. Which now takes precedence over real human rights, like freedom of speech and freedom of thought. Canada's great history of civil liberties is coming to an end. A few weeks ago, Jyoti Gondek, the mayor of Calgary, Canada's fourth-largest city, announced the same thing: that anyone who says something she finds hateful or vitriolic, or lying should be arrested and fined. Some might say she is hateful and vitriolic and tells lies. Those aren't crimes by the way. That mayor publicly demanded that police arrest a pastor named Derek Reimer because she found him offensive. So they arrested Pastor Reimer, and jailed him — for being offensive.  There are a lot of arrests of peaceful political critics in Canada these days. Pastor Artur Pawlowski was jailed for a month and a half for keeping his church open during the lockdowns. Justin Trudeau invoked martial law and had peaceful trucker protesters arrested and jailed for the sin of embarrassing him on the world stage. He also seized the bank accounts of hundreds of other peaceful critics of his regime. In his defence, he did try to warn us about his beliefs, even before he was elected https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1626579644714557442 When a politician says he admires Communist China precisely because of its basic dictatorship, we should believe him. When Fidel Castro died, Trudeau wrote a eulogy like a son would write for a father. Cuban health care is a disaster. “while a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro's supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el comandante”." Is that what his “detractors” say, from their prison cells? That Castro was just a loveable old dictator who really had their best interests at heart? So gross. https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1621245655850303489 But here's the thing. Arresting peaceful protesters, deploying riot police to stomp on your critics, seizing bank accounts — it looks awful. It's messy. It's so obviously controlled by politicians and it's so obviously designed to stifle political dissent. But if you're going to silence someone, the way to do it in 2023 is much different from how Castor did it a generation ago. And Trudeau knows that. And while his allies are having noisy press conferences where they absolutely make it clear that they're all about silencing their political enemies, Trudeau is smarter than that. You see, the truly modern fascist uses the Internet, not the police, to censor people wherever possible. When you take over the Internet, there are no shocking TV images of cops beating up your opponents. It's all done online. There's nothing to see. And that's what I want to warn the world about — that's the message that everyone who loves or even just likes Canada needs to know: Trudeau has embarked on a massive legislative program to censor the Internet. He's going through it in four stages, the first of which is about to become law within weeks. Trudeau has four laws set up like dominos. The first leads to the second, which leads to the third and so-on. He's doing it in stages. If he were to do it all at once people might panic and rise up. But he's going it incrementally. But the first domino will fall in weeks maybe even days. BILL C-11 Later this month, Trudeau's majority in the Senate will approve bill C-11, which amends the Broadcasting Act. In a way, this is the most important stage, the first domino, because until now, the government hasn't been able to regulate what's on the Internet. Until now, only regular television and radio have been regulated by Trudeau and his hand-picked censors at the CRTC, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. It even sounds archaic, doesn't it? What's a radio-television? Is that like a motion picture or something? Anyways, that dinosaur regulator, which has been an utter failure and has driven so much talent out of Canada, will now control the Internet — by declaring that social media companies are now “broadcasters” that can be regulated like TV stations. This enactment amends the Broadcasting Act to, among other things, (a) add online undertakings — undertakings for the transmission or retransmission of programs over the Internet — as a distinct class of broadcasting undertakings” In the past, the government could only bully radio and TV stations into silencing voices the government didn't like. About 20 years ago, the Liberal government refused to renew the licence of a politically incorrect radio station in Quebec called Choi-FM — effectively killing it. It was only saved when 50,000 listeners marched in the streets of Quebec City, and another 5,000 went all the way to Ottawa to protest the censorship — only then did the government relent. Here's a news clip from the Parliament Hill protest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-yDalFUU8Q That's incredible, and it was incredible to see other media support Choi-FM. These days, the mainstream media takes the lead in censoring and cancelling voices they don't like. So that's the main threat of C-11: it declares that Facebook and Google and YouTube and Twitter are now broadcasters. And they have to do what the government says, or they'll be punished like CHOI-FM was. You can see the outlines of what Trudeau plans to do with his new power. Look at the section. 9.1., called “conditions”. As in, Trudeau can now put editorial conditions on Internet companies. Conditions 9.1 (1) The Commission may, in furtherance of its ob- jects, make orders imposing conditions on the carrying on of broadcasting undertakings that the Commission considers appropriate for the implementation of the broadcasting policy set out in subsection 3(1), including conditions respecting…” and then a list of things. If I were Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk, I might object to a few of these conditions. Like this one: “9o) the provision to the Commission, by persons carrying on broadcasting undertakings, of any other information that the Commission considers necessary for the administration of this Act, including (i) financial or commercial information, (ii) information related to programming, (iii) information related to expenditures made under sections 11.1, and 35 (iv) information related to audience measurement, other than information that could identify any individual audience member So now social media companies — including Elon Musk's privately-held Twitter — now have to answer any private business question put to them by Trudeau. There are sixteen items in that list of conditions. But here's one that really worried me from a censorship point of view. It's subsection e. Trudeau can make orders regarding: "(e) the presentation of programs and programming services for selection by the public, including the showcasing and the discoverability of Canadian pro- grams and programming services…" So Trudeau can order Twitter, Facebook, Google, or YouTube to alter the algorithm to interfere with what you can find. Trudeau can force social media companies to “showcase” whatever content he wants and to alter the “discoverability” of it. So he can boost his friends and have companies hide his enemies. It effectively nationalizes social media — now it is all under Trudeau's control. So it's not just C-11. It's what comes after C-11 that's terrifying. Because once Trudeau has the power to regulate the Internet, only then will he reveal what he will do with it. And as we saw during the trucker convoy, he will suspend civil liberties if it suits him. BILL C-18 C-11 is just step one. But Trudeau already has another bill in Parliament called C-18, or the Online News Act. And just like C-11 makes social media companies “broadcasters” for Trudeau to regulate, C-18 creates a new thing, called “digital intermediaries. Here's how that's defined in the bill: "digital news intermediary means an online communications platform, including a search engine or social media service, that is subject to the legislative authority of Parliament and that makes news content produced by news outlets available to persons in Canada.” So that's a fancy way of saying any sort of search engine. And every social media platform has that, by the way. Not just explicit search engines like Google. But also YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Anything with a search engine, that if you type in something, like “carbon tax” or “Trudeau blackface” it returns a list of links for news stories. Just the headline, maybe the first sentence, and a link to click if you want to see more. Now, as you know, that's how the Internet works — things link to other things. For free. No one has to pay for a link, no one has to get paid for a link. People generally love getting linked to, since it sends traffic to what you're doing. If a bunch of people post a story to Facebook about a Rebel News story, we love it, because they click the link and come to our site, and that's good for us. In fact, many news companies pay to promote themselves on search engines — sometimes you see ads show up in the search results (marked as ads). So obviously if newspapers are advertising on Facebook or Google, it's because they see value in it. But what C-18 does is it forces social media companies and search engines to pay any news organization they link to. They are literally going to be compelled to pay to link to someone. Here's how a Liberal MP Lisa Hepfner put it: https://twitter.com/lisahepfner/status/1603134194909171714 gov't will always support quality, fact-based and local Canadian journalism in a fair digital marketplace. This bill makes it harder for big digital platforms like Facebook and Google to steal local journalists' articles and repost them without credit on one of their networks 3/3 Yeah, when Google links to a story, it's not stealing. That's disinformation, isn't it? But look at her language — the government will support quality, fact-based journalism. What does that mean? Well, again, it means only journalism that Trudeau likes will be subsidized. It's right in the law: Eligible news businesses — designation 27 (1) At the request of a news business, the Commission must, by order, designate the business as eligible if it 30 (a) is a qualified Canadian journalism organization as defined in subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act That qualified Canadian journalism organization designation is really a Canadian news licence — if you have it, it means Trudeau “trusts” you. If you don't, he demonizes you as misinformation. We applied for that QCJO status, and the government reviewed hundreds of Rebel News stories and bizarrely declared that what we do is not news. Huh? It's called Rebel News. It's not sports or weather or cooking. They literally said 99% of what we do isn't newsy. That's bizarre, and we are legally appealing that decision. But it's pretty obvious why we were denied, but hard-left-wing media groups like the Tides Foundation-backed National Observer get the designation: because they're in step with Trudeau's regime. So C-11 commandeers the Internet. And lets Trudeau manipulate the algorithm. C-18 makes big tech companies pay money to journalists in Canada — but only to the journalists that Trudeau likes, not the ones he doesn't like. That's handy. By the way, Facebook has said that if they're forced to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to link to Trudeau's favourite journalists, they just won't link to Trudeau's favourite journalists. They say it's not a moneymaker for them, and if Trudeau really thinks it's “stealing” to link to the Globe and Mail or whoever, then they'll stop doing it. Google is soldiering doing the same — and Trudeau calls that “blocking” news sites. Got it. So if you link to them, you're stealing. If you don't link to them, you're blocking them. The only solution is to give hundreds of millions of dollars — but only to journalists that Trudeau's hand-picked cronies approve. Not to Rebel News — we don't have a government news licence. So that's C-18, it's Trudeau's second censorship bill. BILL C-36 C-36 is the next one. It was actually introduced in the last Parliament but didn't get passed before the election was called. Trudeau has said they'll reintroduce it. It's terrifying. Because it doesn't just deal with money and algorithms. It gets right into what you can or can't say — and it has jail terms and huge fines if you say the things Trudeau doesn't like. Let me read to you its formal name, and you can get the picture:"An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act and to make related amendments to another Act (hate propaganda, hate crimes and hate speech)” Yeah. Trudeau calls people haters all the time — Islamophobes, transphobes, racists, whatever. He usually just means those as insults. But now he means them as crimes. So if you oppose him, he'll call you names and charge you with crimes. If you don't believe me, read the bill. Just to start, hate propaganda is already in our Criminal Code. Section 318 of our Criminal Code already makes it a crime to advocate for genocide; section 319 makes it a crime to incite hatred. But C-36 goes much further. It's pretty brief. But it tries to criminalize feelings. Including hate: hatred means the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain; It's totalitarian to pass laws telling people how to feel and think. You can't tell someone simply not to be upset; try that with your wife or husband: just order them not to feel bad; they'll feel worse. Hate often comes from an underlying grievance; if you don't deal with that in some way, you can “ban” hate all you like, but it won't work — in fact, you'll probably make it worse. So they've defined the feelings you're not allowed to have. And now they're going to ban it. You see, they've decided to regulate the Internet. They've got their bureaucrats at the CRTC through C-11. They're getting the big tech companies through C-18. C-36 is where they really come for you: Communication of hate speech 13 (1) It is a discriminatory practice to communicate or cause to be communicated hate speech by means of the Internet or other means of telecommunication in a context in which the hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination. Who knows if something will foment hate? I'm pretty sure they'll say everything foments hate — these people are professionally offended, it's their job and their hobby and their sense of identity. For the purposes of subsection (1), a person who communicates or causes to be communicated hate speech continues to do so for as long as the hate speech remains public and the person can remove or block access to it. That means if you Tweeted or Facebooked something even years ago, even when you were a kid, you're still guilty of that hate crime today. There is no statute of limitations. You know, in real courts there's the idea of being able to confront your accuser. To look them in the eye and challenge them. Not here — Trudeau is setting up a secret course. Complaints about hate speech will be made in secret — and these secret complainants can get up to $20 grand for their complaints. It's a new industry: Non-disclosure of identity — Commission (8) The Commission may deal with a complaint in rela-tion to a discriminatory practice described in section 13 without disclosing, to the person against whom the com-plaint was filed or to any other person, the identity of the alleged victim, the individual or group of individuals who has filed the complaint or any individual who has given evidence or assisted the Commission in any way in dealing with the complaint, if the Commission considers that there is a real and substantial risk that any of those individuals will be subjected to threats, intimidation or discrimination. Secret courts, secret witnesses, secret complaints. A rival; an ex; a disgruntled former employee; or a political prankster. You can be sued forever, endlessly, and you won't even know by whom. You can be ordered to pay huge fines:  (b) an order to pay compensation of not more than $20,000 to any victim personally identified in the communication that constituted the discriminatory practice But there's something in here even more amazing: "pre-crimes”. Like in the movie Minority Report. Even if you haven't done anything yet, you can still be prosecuted. I'm not kidding: Fear of hate propaganda offence or hate crime 810.012 (1) A person may, with the Attorney General's consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that an- other person will commit (a) an offence under section 318 or subsection 319(1) 5 or (2)  (b) an offence under subsection 430(4.1);  (c) an offence motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or any other similar factor. So even if someone hasn't broken the law yet, but you're afraid they might, you can go to court and strike first. And if a judge says your fear is reasonable, he'll lock up the person you're afraid of, even if that person hasn't done anything, doesn't do anything, or won't ever do anything. He'll issue an order against him. Do you think this just might, maybe, be abused? Getting your opponents locked up, even before they say anything? You can be put under house arrest, with a curfew; have your firearms seized; have an ankle bracelet put on you; be banned from using drugs or booze; things that normally happen only to convicted criminals who actually did something. THE ONLINE HARMS ACT And they saved the worst for last — the Online Harms Act, which hasn't been introduced yet, or given a number. C-11 uses a slow and dumb bureaucracy called the CRTC. C-18 is the same. C-36 includes huge fines and jail time, but at least involves some judges. But none of that is tough enough and punitive for Trudeau. So his final bill, out of the four, creates a new Internet censorship office, with the Orwelling name of "Digital Safety Commissioner of Canada.” • The Act should provide for the establishment of the Digital Safety Commissioner, whose functions are to: • Oversee and improve online content moderation, by: • Administering and enforcing obligations; • Engaging with and considering the particular needs of and barriers faced by groups disproportionately affected by harmful online content such as women and girls, Indigenous Peoples, members of racialized communities and religious minorities and of LGBTQ2 and gender-diverse communities and persons with disabilities; and • Supporting platforms in reducing harmful content affecting peoples in Canada. • Engage in partnerships, education outreach activities, and research, to help fulfill the policy objectives of the Act. So an ultimate, unaccountable, hunter-killer to silence anything “harmful”. And by harmful, they mean whatever this censor doesn't like. Trudeau proposes extreme ideas like website takedowns within 24 hours — no time for any sort of hearing. If Trudeau or his team don't like something, they order a social media company to take it down, and it must come down within 24 hours. https://www.michaelgeist.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Twitter-Submission-Online-Harms-Consultation. Twitter's response to this — and let me emphasize, this is from before Elon Musk took over Twitter. So this was when Twitter was pretty pro-censorship itself. Twitter wrote a private memo to Trudeau, warning that this is literally the stuff that North Korea does — they made that comparison: ISSUE: 24-HOUR TAKEDOWN REQUIREMENTS Twitter opposes the recommendation of a time limit on “addressing” any content “flagged” by any person in Canada as “harmful” content. • The proposed time limit does not allow for judicious, thoughtful analysis in a manner that balances the right to freedom of expression in Canada with the right to freedom from discrimination and prejudice. • According to existing research and analysis, the proposed system has a high probability of negatively impacting marginalized, racialized and intersectional groups. More information from Prof. Suzie Dunn at Dalhousie University can be found here. • The 24-hour proposal should be abandoned. Content should be addressed as quickly and as possible and within the scope of existing Canadian jurisprudence, terms of service and rules by the online communication service providers. • Further, any standard applied in the digital world should also be applied in real life. For example, law enforcement should be required to both launch an investigation within 24 hours of “flagging” as well as remove any hateful content - graffiti on a statue for example - that appears within 24 hours across the country. And here's Twitter comparing Trudeau's proposal to China: • ISSUE: WEBSITE BLOCKING The proposal by the government of Canada to allow the Digital Safety Commissioner to block websites is drastic. People around the world have been blocked from accessing Twitter and other services in a similar manner as the one proposed by Canada by multiple authoritarian governments (China, North Korea, and Iran for example) under the false guise of ‘online safety,' impeding peoples' rights to access information online. CONCLUSION Four bills. Falling like dominos. C-11, C-18, C-36 and the Online Harms Act. Each one building on the other, to build a censorship regime whose only comparison is places like North Korea. Trudeau has the support of the NDP, so these simply will become the law. And it's not like any of the mainstream media are actively opposing them — the opposite; they're excited about Trudeau forcing Big Tech to pay them money for links. The media have been bought off, again. Canada is in trouble, and the watchdogs who are supposed to be on guard are all sleeping. I promise that we hear at Rebel News will do what we can. And I see that as three things. Keeping you up to date on the state of censorship in Canada. So, reporting the news — say, have you heard about all of this from the CBC state broadcaster? Yeah, I didn't think so. Making the arguments for why this is morally wrong, legally wrong, impractical and downright unCanadian. So, giving you the facts, and the arguments. What Rebel News does best: actually fighting the good fight. All week I have been speaking with constitutional lawyers about how to fight this censorship onslaught. In court. Because if we don't, who will? I have commissioned an expert litigation law firm to prepare to fight these bills in court. In fact, they are working on the lawsuit already; we're not even waiting for the bills to be officially proclaimed — we're working on it now. We will sue Trudeau in court — and hold him to the Charter of Rights. I know it's a long shot. We'll be outspent ten two one. They will have a swarm of lawyers there to fight against us. But we can win. I know, because we've beaten him twice, on censorship battles. In 2019, he banned us from attending the election debates — we took him to court and won. He tried again in 2021. That time he banned us, and when we sued him, he literally had seven government lawyers against us. But we won again. Twice we beat him. Against all odds. Maybe there's some hope left. This is the battle of 2023. What the trucker convoy was last year, the Internet battle is this year. Help us if you can — learn the facts, learn the arguments, and then help us take this Castro mini-me to court.

The lockdowns shook my faith in the police. Police were enforcing things that were not criminal offences; they were often being bullies about it; the best police were either reassigned to other files, or frankly took early retirement, or were suspended from the force because they didn't want to get jabbed. Police didn't fight crime; they enforced political dictates, that often changed week by week. How many people were in a gathering; what kind of gatherings; Costco and the liquor store were fine, but not churches. What a joke — but the police enthusiastically became political weapons. Remember when they deployed a hundred cops because Adam Skelly kept his smoked meat restaurant open? Yeah, that wasn't real policing. The low point of course was when the police agreed to enforce a police state. There was no national emergency; the country wasn't in danger. Trudeau was embarrassed; that's all. So the police stomped on people with riot horses. And then they had a good laugh about it in their internal WhatsApp group. They talked about their jackboots crushing citizens. Not a single one of those cops was suspended. And that cop who assaulted Alexa Lavoie? His name is Sgt. Jordan Arthur We're suing him. I should tell you that the RCMP says they're investigating him too, which is interesting. Except they're lying. The attack on Alexa was more then a year ago, but they still haven't even interviewed Jordan Arthur yet. Some interview. More like a whitewash and a cover-up. What a disgrace. What do you do when a cop is a criminal? Because that's what it is when a cop shoots someone, for no reason, with a weapon that isn't even designed to be shot at someone. So, so gross. The woke are destroying everything strong and male and proud. They've turned football, NASCAR, and even the military into anti-American, woke, take-a-knee messes. They focus more on diversity and transgenderism than on national security. They're corroding everything from the inside out, to demoralize men. Where were the police in America when Antifa riots swept the nation, creating chaos in the months before the 2020 election? Well, some of them were busy bringing Trump protesters into the Capitol building, literally guiding them through the building. Just yesterday, left-wingers, including transgender activists, recently stormed several government buildings, including the capitol building in Nashville, but the CBC didn't even cover it. They tussled with police, and, shockingly, they'll only face two years in jail. The law only seems to go one way now. Antifa is praised by the establishment while the Proud Boys, a drinking fraternity, is on Canada's list of terrorist groups. Not because they are terrorists, but because Trudeau needed something to point to when he wanted to say "right-wing terrorist group." My point is that the rule of law is now malleable, and it all depends on who is holding the stick. The news out of New York City is alarming, with an extremist District Attorney, elected with George Soros money, indicting Trump and calling for his arrest and extradition to New York from Florida. This has nothing to do with him being president, it's the relitigation of Trump paying money to a stripper. I don't even care whether he had sex with her or not; the fact that this is what Trump is being arrested and jailed for is absurd, and the justice system has been twisted to accomplish this for obvious political reasons. You cannot trust the legal system in America anymore — not if there are politics afoot. Here's a member of the grand jury in Georgia who said she voted to prosecute trump because she was excited about meeting him. Yeah, I think things are broken. But they're broken just one way. Have you ever seen a conservative, or a Republican, in the U.S. or Canada use the legal system to fight a battle? And I don't mean to fight unfairly, to twist the law and abuse it. I mean, to fight a crime when the perpetrator is a leftist Well, that's my news today. And it continues to impress me about Ron DeSantis in Florida. He's one of 26 Republican governors. They all have similar powers. But he's the only one using all the tools at his disposal to push his agenda. Every liberal does. Every Democrat does. But Republicans don't. And it's amazing to watch the one guy who does. So the law — the FACE Act — was drafted to target people who committed crimes at abortion centres. But DeSantis is using it to target people who commit crimes are pregnancy centres — which is actually what reproductive health means; it's not an ironic euphemism. But they're right — it is unprecedented. Our side never fights back. It's always prosecutions of Trump — not Clinton or Obama. Not Antifa. And how about here in Canada? Pastor Derek Reimer was assaulted — he didn't assault anyone. He's been charged; but not those who attacked him. Danielle Smith's sovereignty act suggests she might take some steps; her firearms act is an example. But where is the prosecution of Antifa, of eco-terrorists? DeSantis shows the way that we too could fight back in Canada.

The Rebel News podcasts features free audio-only versions of select RebelNews+ content and other Rebel News long-form videos, livestreams, and interviews. Monday to Friday enjoy the audio version of Ezra Levant's daily TV-style show, The Ezra Levant Show, where Ezra gives you his contrarian and conservative take on free speech, politics, and foreign policy through in-depth commentary and interviews. Wednesday evenings you can listen to the audio version of The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid the Chief Reporter of Rebel News. Sheila brings a western sensibility to Canadian news. With one foot in the oil patch and one foot in agriculture, Sheila challenges mainstream media narratives and stands up for Albertans. If you want to watch the video versions of these podcasts, make sure to begin your free RebelNewsPlus trial by subscribing at http://www.RebelNewsPlus.com

Yesterday the TikTok CEO was grilled by U.S. lawmakers on Capitol Hill. TikTok is a Chinese company, and China has laws that state that every tech company must give unfettered back-door access to their entire systems to the Chinese security state. As in, everything TikTok knows, the Chinese secret police and military know. They don't need to ask; they don't need to go to court to get a search warrant. It's China. It's a dictatorship. They just take it. It's not a secret. You might say — so what does TikTok know about its users that is so damaging to U.S. and Canadian national security? I mean, half of TikTok is silly video trends. But that's the bait — the fun video sing-alongs. The fun video filters, like the one that — I don't know how they do it — make you look like you're 20 years young. ONLINE PRIVACY But the worrying part is that the app is on your phone, and it has access to everything. You give it access to everything on your phone. Your friends list. Your photos and videos. Your GPS location. It asks you for permission, you click yes, and it has the information. Over 100 million Americans have opted-in. Here's a link to their privacy policy. Who do we share your information with? We share your data with third-party service providers who help us to deliver the Platform, such as cloud storage providers. We also share your information with business partners, other companies in the same group as TikTok, content moderation services, measurement providers, advertisers, and analytics providers. Where and when required by law, we will share your information with law enforcement agencies or regulators, and with third parties pursuant to a legally binding court order. That's a gentle way of saying they share it with anyone they want — including the Chinese government. Look at this paragraph: _User Content and Behavioural Information. We process the content you generate and view on the Platform, including preferences you set (such as choice of language) photographs, audios and videos you upload or create, comments and livestreams you make (“User Content”). We collect User Content through pre-loading at the time of creation, import, or upload, regardless of whether you choose to save or upload that User Content, in order to recommend audio options and provide other personalized recommendations. We may collect information about the images and audio that are a part of your User Content, such as identifying the objects and scenery that appear, the existence and location within an image of face and body features and attributes, the nature of the audio, and the text of the words spoken in your User Content._ We may access content, including text, images, and video, found in your device's clipboard, with your permission. It goes on. You give them everything, forever, for free, for them to do whatever they like. HAN DONG I mean, it's bad, sure. But is it as bad as having an accused Chinese agent sitting in your Parliament, as part of the government? Dong's been accused of working with the Chinese dictatorship, advising them to keep the two Michaels in prison longer. The Trudeau government determined that there was no “actionable evidence” after it received a CSIS transcript of an early 2021 conversation between Liberal MP Han Dong and China's top diplomat in Toronto, according to a senior government source – saying conclusions could not be drawn that Mr. Dong asked Beijing to keep two Canadians in prison for political reasons. What was he doing reporting to Beijing? He's not a foreign minister. TIKTOK AND HUAWEI TikTok is awful. And don't think Facebook and YouTube are any better — we know from what Twitter has disclosed under Elon Musk that they were the same. Twitter was basically in the service of the CIA and FBI. So of course TikTok is in the service of China's PLA. I don't mind the idea of banning TikTok — it's malware, it's spyware, it feels like a toy, a game, a hobby, whatever, an entertainment, but it's an espionage tool — just like DJI drones. Almost all the drones sold in America are Chinese made — and all of their data goes through their servers back in China. I would say that every square inch of America is mapped in high def by Americans using drones. And that's all in China's hands now. And 100 million humans, and all of their social connections. They have all the info, all of it. In 2021, Trudeau partnered with Huawei to sponsor leading-edge computer and electrical engineering research at Canadian universities, "a move critics say threatens this country's national security and economic interests." So yeah. On your app. Or on your Huawei phone. Or in your telecom hardware. Or your MPs. Or your prime minister. Or your former governor-general. Or your former PM, who went to work for China less than two months after retiring as PM. JOE BIDEN Now Joe Biden may even be worse. He may even be on the payroll, indirectly. His son Hunter takes millions — some reporting suggests much, much more — from China. For no apparent work or skills. Who just happened to fly to China with Biden on Air Force One ten years ago when Biden was VP. So you have two of the most compromised leaders in the world, when it comes to China. And two of the most corrupt leaders in the world. And two of the frankly stupidest leaders in the world. At least Biden has an excuse — he's lived a long life and he's in his twilight years, he's 80, and he's losing some of his sharpness. It's a huge problem. But our government was corrupted the old-fashioned way — money and power. Before I stop talking about TikTok, let me tell you that I downloaded the app, then deleted it because I was worried about security. But then I downloaded it again because how can you say no? Whenever conservatives are in power — Donald Trump, or Stephen Harper — the media party and the left tells us they're warmongers, they're cowboys, they don't know how diplomacy is done. It's a lie — Harper had stronger relations with every country after his term than the beginning — except Russia. Trump Brough peace to the Middle East, and the Korean Peninsula, and Russia, which invaded Ukraine both before and after Trump didn't dare do such a thing while he was in office. Harper didn't have such military power. But he had some respect from world leaders. Even Obama, who disagreed with Harper on most things, agreed to exempt Canadians from his Buy American rules; softwood lumber problems; Obama didn't approve KXL, but at least he didn't ban it — until Trudeau took office. It's true that Trudeau opened our borders to every fake refugee in America; but it's also true that the Democrats are bussing migrants up here — easier than deporting them. Speaking of which, did you see our new trailer for our undercover Roxham Road video? Oh well. Back to Ottawa. Dumb and dumber. It's insane that Biden says he's going to run again, and it looks like he means it. It's even crazier that Trudeau will, too. Guest: Barbara Kay, Columnist, National Post speaks on Trudeau Liberals MAID regime.

Frontlines w/ Drew Hernandez Reporter, Kalen D'Almeida flew to UC DAVIS to cover a local LGBTQ event and report on their demented event. Evil ANTIFA thugs spawned to see Kalen and his cameraman. Kalen was violently attacked by these domestic terrorists as he explains in today's show. On top of this, Ian Miles Cheong joins Frontlines to discuss the future revelations of Twitter. Follow Frontlines: Twitter: @FrontlinesShow Instagram: @FrontlinesShow GETTR: @FrontlinesShow Rumble Watch Frontlines on Real America's Voice every week day at 7:30pmPST-10:30pmEST!

David Menzies is joined by Drea Humphrey for this midweek edition of the DAILY Roundup. Today, David and Drea are looking at the not-so-warm welcome Prime Minister Justin Trudeau got as he made another visit to the GTA, this time in Vaughan. While speaking in the GTA, Trudeau also weighed in on illegal migrants — irregular immigration, according to the PM — entering Canada through Roxham Road after being driven to the border under orders from New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Plus, Liberal MP Anthony Housefather probably doesn't even realize it, but he slipped up and shed light on the secrecy surrounding COVID vaccines — and why some people are so hesitant to take one.

Frontlines reporter Kalen D'Almeida was just trying to ask some questions in a public space, on UC Davis' campus, but anarchist thugs don't want to allow free speech. You don't want to miss the exclusive footage - showing these anti-fascists attacking the Frontlines team. Plus, what are Elon Musk's real intentions with Twitter? Special guest Ian Miles Cheong joins Drew to discuss that and the future of A.I.Follow Frontlines: Twitter: @FrontlinesShow Instagram: @FrontlinesShow GETTR: @FrontlinesShow Rumble Watch Frontlines on Real America's Voice every week day at 7:30pmPST-10:30pmEST!

Everyone who doesn't love journalist, commentator and Elon Musk favorite Ian Miles Cheong hates him – but really hates him. Ron asks him why. The post “The Man They Love to Hate” appeared first on ColemanNation.

Nina Paley's comic "Agents of H.A.G." was cancelled by crowdfunding platform Indiegogo after raising 150% of her funding goal w/ all orders being refunded. The "Trust and Safety" council having found her views as a Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF) too problematic.Join Nina (a BTR regular) along w/ newcomers Ian Miles Cheong & Clifton Duncan to talk about where this leads & how to fight back.SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE ️ BREAKTHERULES.TV FOR MORE!====================================================Featuring Nina Paleyhttps://twitter.com/ninapaleyhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/heterodorx/id1602842758Ian Miles Cheonghttps://twitter.com/stillgrayClifton Duncanhttps://twitter.com/cliftonaduncanhttps://www.youtube.com/c/CliftonDuncanEntertainmentLev Polyakovhttps://twitter.com/Levpohttp://youtube.com/levpolyakov====================================================FOLLOW BTR:Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/breaktherulesDISCORD: https://discord.gg/hHTNg3MTwitter - http://twitter.com/breakth3rulesInstagram - http://instagram.com/breakth3rulesFacebook - http://facebook.com/breakth3rulesMinds - https://www.minds.com/breaktherulesOdysee - https://odysee.com/@breaktherules:f/liveTwitch - https://www.twitch.tv/breakth3rules/DLive - https://dlive.tv/breakth3rulesBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/JfUzQfuQpWc0/Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/0yovF9Vo8n1fF1DGlMuWBhApple - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/break-the-rules/id1543233584

This episode of #PoHRadio features journalists Brandon Darby, Michael Quinn Sullivan and Twiter Files insider Ian Miles Cheong as well as one of Houston's most brilliant entrepreneurial minds - Carlos from Giant Texas Distillers!

This episode of #PoHRadio features journalists Brandon Darby, Michael Quinn Sullivan and Twiter Files insider Ian Miles Cheong as well as one of Houston's most brilliant entrepreneurial minds - Carlos from Giant Texas Distillers!

This episode of #PoHRadio features journalists Brandon Darby, Michael Quinn Sullivan and Twiter Files insider Ian Miles Cheong as well as one of Houston's most brilliant entrepreneurial minds - Carlos from Giant Texas Distillers!

This episode of #PoHRadio features journalists Brandon Darby, Michael Quinn Sullivan and Twiter Files insider Ian Miles Cheong as well as one of Houston's most brilliant entrepreneurial minds - Carlos from Giant Texas Distillers!

Elon Musk called a report on Antifa wanting to burn down Tesla “concerning.” The Tesla CEO responded to  on screenshots of calls to action. Andy Ngô, editor-at-large for the , shared screenshots of the calls to action by the now-suspended Twitter account . The account posted links to Tesla locations and encouraged followers to add their own.“Tonight in Portland! Every city, every town! Show up at your local Tesla dealerships in protest of Elon Musk!” one screenshot read with a photo of a burning Tesla. Ngô noted that the extremists wanted to get revenge on Elon Musk for suspending their accounts on Twitter.The new Twitter CEO banned a pro-Palestinian terrorist group that actively promoted and celebrated violence against Jews. The account, Ian Miles Cheong noted, has been active since 2021.Cheong added that he hoped more could be done to crack down on the violence, and Elon Musk agreed that the violence was “not okay.” In  Ngô, Elon Musk said, “Incitement to violence will result in account suspension.”Support the showSign Up For Exclusive Episodes At: https://reasonabletv.com/LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. https://www.youtube.com/c/NewsForReasonablePeople

Drew brings on special guest Ian Miles Cheong to discuss the many reasons why minorities – especially the hispanic community –  are fleeing the policies and rhetoric of the left in droves. Why is the left pushing terms like LatinX, when it doesn't actually resonate with a majority of the people in those groups? Why do all the measures to keep everything ‘inclusive' seem to actually EXCLUDE the majority?

As situations continue to escalate in the Netherlands with the Dutch Farmer Rebellion, the Counter Signal's Keean Bexte joins Andrew Says to give updates from the ground in Holland, as farmers and truckers alike continue to block roadways, airports and other areas in response to a green energy plan that will see a significant number of them out of work. Writer and commentator Ian Miles Cheong discusses the uprising, along with topics such as inflation, social media censorship and prominent women such as Macey Gray and Bette Midler coming to the defence of women-only spaces. Last but not least, comedian Casey Rocket speaks on political correctness in comedy and the role of streaming/media platforms in hosting content and whether or not they should take sides in the culture war.

Few political commentators talk on as wide of a range of topics as Ian Miles Cheong. We will be asking questions about all of them, so don't expect today's episode of The JD Rucker Show to stop at one hour.

The summer of RAGE kicks off as Satanic pro-abortion protestors rally at the Arizona State Capitol. Host Drew Hernandez was on the ground documenting the insanity — apparently these people don't want to just kill babies, they want to eat them.Plus Drew dives into the very latest on the deadly mass shootings over the weekend with special guest Ian Miles Cheong.

Evelyn Rae and Ian Miles Cheong discuss Elon Musk, Disney and the woke takeover, transgenderism and kids, the Great Reset, and more.

New leaked audio from an ALL-HANDS meeting inside Twitter is revealing just how much employees are worried about losing their definition of “FrEe SpEeCh.” FRONTLINES host Drew Hernandez brings in special guest Ian Miles Cheong to talk about what that means for the company. Plus, a new book put out by the American Academy of Pediatrics is targeting YOUNG KIDS with a new book all about RADICAL gender ideology.

WANT TO SUPPORT 'Cotto/Gottfried?' Send the show a monthly contribution! Follow this link and click 'Monthly tip': https://streamlabs.com/cottogottfried/. Rather make a one-time donation? No worries about size -- the thought really counts: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme2/CottoGottfried. Just for the record (obvious as it may seem), Cotto Gottfried Inc. is a FOR-PROFIT enterprise, so NOTHING you send it is tax deductible. Cheers! PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO 'C/G' on one (or more -- maybe even all) of the following podcasting platforms ASAP: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1494171864 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1X7N1Xw0EstfhuqjAVI6VB Pocket Casts: https://pca.st/rpzzk0z8 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/anchor-podcasts-provider-2/cottogottfried#/ Google Podcasts: https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8xMWY0M2IyOC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw== Overcast: https://overcast.fm/itunes1494171864/cotto-gottfried Castbox: https://castbox.fm/channel/Cotto%2FGottfried-id2556945 Anchor: https://anchor.fm/cotto-gottfried Radio Public: https://radiopublic.com/cottogottfried-6VZegX

April 1, 2022: Alexa Lavoie and Ian Miles Cheong discuss a slew of headlines coming to you this April Fools' Day — and no, none of them are jokes. Quebec's public health director says 'all options are on the table' in face of 6th wave. And a Disney executive pledges to make over 50% of characters LGBTQ by the end of the year. Plus much more. Monday to Friday enjoy the audio version of Ezra Levant's daily TV-style show, The Ezra Levant Show, where Ezra gives you his contrarian and conservative take on free speech, politics, and foreign policy through in-depth commentary and interviews. Wednesday Evenings you can listen to the audio version of The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid the Chief Reporter of Rebel News. Sheila brings a western sensibility to Canadian news. With one foot in the oil patch and one foot in agriculture, Sheila challenges mainstream media narratives and stands up for Albertans. Thursday nights catch Andrew Says with Andrew Chapados this show features notable guests from politics, entertainment and the news world. Join Andrew for an honest discussion on on-going world issues like public policy, censorship and freedom. Finally on Friday nights, catch the audio version of Rebel Roundup with David Menzies. David interviews three journalists about some of the most interesting stories they have been reporting on over the past week. If you want to watch the video versions of these podcasts, make sure to begin your free RebelNewsPlus trial by subscribing at http://www.RebelNewsPlus.com

Someone who has been leading the charge to cut through the misinformation on all sides is Rebel News resident vaccine fact nerd, Tamara Ugolini.

Dakota Christensen and Ian Miles Cheong discuss the West's declining stature in the world.

Catch up on what you missed on an episode of The Richard Syrett Show. Toronto Sun Columnist Joe Warmington on Canada becoming a police state. “The Sofa Cinephile” w/ Jim Sallas. The Lim Riddler riddles you a new one. National Post Columnist, John Robson on banks freezing funds and the emergencies act. Rebel News Contributor, Ian Miles Cheong on his article “'Masked and violent attackers' armed with axes and flare guns attack Coastal GasLink drill site in BC.”

Ian says the quiet part out loud. Follow him anywhere @stillgray. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/oneamerican/support

Today I go over some recent twitter drama with Ian Miles Cheong and Gothix.