Sworn body of people convened to render a verdict officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment
POPULARITY
Categories
David discusses the movies he's been watching, including Girls Town, Wolf Man, Grand Theft Hamlet, Moana 2, The Brutalist, Babygirl, When Harry Met Sally..., Joker: Folie à Deux, Unstoppable, No Other Land, Juror #2, Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat, Between the Temples, Eyes of Laura Mars and In the Mouth of Madness.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
We've reached the end of our century-long movie-watching odyssey. In this final episode of Season 1, we tackle four wildly different films: the icy precision of Red Rooms, the old-school courtroom vibes of Juror #2, the slapstick madness of Hundreds of Beavers, and the chaotic commitment of I'm Still Here. Thanks for joining us on the ride; we'll see you for Season 2!Connect with us:Never Did It on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neverdiditpodNever Did It on Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/bradgaroon/list/never-did-it-podcast/Brad on Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/bradgaroon/Jake on Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/jake_ziegler/Never Did It on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/neverdiditpodcast Hosted by Brad Garoon & Jake Ziegler
There's this quiet habit so many of you have… AND it's costing you in the courtroom. You're waiting. Waiting to be liked. Waiting to be approved of. Waiting for some signal that it's safe to lead. But here's the truth: Nobody hands you authority in that courtroom, you CLAIM it. In this episode, I'm diving into what I call the Permission Principle. So many of you are holding back without even realizing it.
One of the alternate jurors, who spoke with Fox News Digital, said Diddy's defense team was effective in undermining the prosecution's case, particularly during cross-examinations. The juror highlighted standout moments like the questioning of witness Dawn Richard and another identified as “Bana,” noting that the defense “definitely poked holes” in their testimonies—an effort the juror believes helped lead to the acquittal on racketeering charges.The juror also shared more personal reflections, expressing that the trial felt exceptionally intense and even cinematic. Though not part of the final deliberations, they said they would have reached the same decision on the racketeering count and emphasized the importance of the trial process. The juror closed by expressing hope that Diddy gets the help he needs—recognizing the defense's portrayal of him as a flawed individual struggling with addiction and personal issues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs juror speaks out on prosecution's RICO case against rapper | Fox News
One of the alternate jurors, who spoke with Fox News Digital, said Diddy's defense team was effective in undermining the prosecution's case, particularly during cross-examinations. The juror highlighted standout moments like the questioning of witness Dawn Richard and another identified as “Bana,” noting that the defense “definitely poked holes” in their testimonies—an effort the juror believes helped lead to the acquittal on racketeering charges.The juror also shared more personal reflections, expressing that the trial felt exceptionally intense and even cinematic. Though not part of the final deliberations, they said they would have reached the same decision on the racketeering count and emphasized the importance of the trial process. The juror closed by expressing hope that Diddy gets the help he needs—recognizing the defense's portrayal of him as a flawed individual struggling with addiction and personal issues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs juror speaks out on prosecution's RICO case against rapper | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
VLOG July 8 US v Sean Combs, hearing today on speed up sentencing, after Alternate Juror from UN calls freak off videos "tame," dissembled to get stay in jury pool: https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/exclusiveextra-diddy-alternate-jurorCrypto Tornado, Megan Thee https://innercitypress.com/sdny267cwoodsmegantheegarciaicp070725.html UN Q on lying staffer(s)
It's been dramatized in countless movies and TV shows, like Law and Order or 12 Angry Men, but you may have wondered if the Hollywood portrayals match up with the reality of jury duty. This year, CityNews Reporter, Nick Westoll, got to find out first hand when he was picked to serve on a jury in a criminal case. From the jury selection process, to the restrictions and being sequestered, to the emotional toll of deciding the fate of an accused, host Cormac Mac Sweeney speaks with Nick about the challenging journey of being a juror in Canada.You can read Nick's first hand account here: https://toronto.citynews.ca/2025/07/03/what-is-ontario-jury-duty-like/ We love feedback at The Big Story, as well as suggestions for future episodes. You can find us:Through email at hello@thebigstorypodcast.ca Or @thebigstoryfpn on Twitter
Mid-Year Tier List Chaos! | We Needed Roads
Willkommen zur Jubiläumsfolge Nr. 255 von BierTalk! Markus und Holger, die beiden Gründer unseres Podcasts, feiern fünf Jahre BierTalk – diesmal jedoch nicht wie geplant live in Südtirol, sondern virtuell und doch ganz nah wie in alten Zeiten. Sie blicken auf die Anfänge des Podcasts zurück, teilen persönliche Erinnerungen an spannende Reisen und bewegende Momente rund ums Bier, und sprechen über die Kunst und Herausforderung, Juror bei internationalen Bierwettbewerben wie dem World Beer Cup zu sein. Dabei dreht sich der Spieß auch einmal um: Holger stellt Markus die Fragen, und so erfahren wir tiefe Einblicke in Markus' Motivation und Leidenschaft für die Bierwelt. Natürlich darf auch das Thema Biergenuss nicht fehlen, und so verkosten beide besondere Biere, begleitet von kreativen Food-Pairings. Freut euch auf eine unterhaltsame und persönliche Folge, vollgepackt mit Geschichten, Fachwissen und echter Bierbegeisterung – eine echte Jubiläumsausgabe eben!
One of the 12 jurors in the Diddy trial defends the verdicts they reached amid speculation they were influenced by Diddy’s celebrity. Amy and T.J. discuss that juror’s outrage and talk about new details from “George,” the alternate juror who said the freak-off videos they watched in court were “tame.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
One of the 12 jurors in the Diddy trial defends the verdicts they reached amid speculation they were influenced by Diddy’s celebrity. Amy and T.J. discuss that juror’s outrage and talk about new details from “George,” the alternate juror who said the freak-off videos they watched in court were “tame.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
One of the 12 jurors in the Diddy trial defends the verdicts they reached amid speculation they were influenced by Diddy’s celebrity. Amy and T.J. discuss that juror’s outrage and talk about new details from “George,” the alternate juror who said the freak-off videos they watched in court were “tame.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This episode was originally published on The Murder Sheet's main feed on July 4, 2025.The Cheat Sheet is The Murder Sheet's segment breaking down weekly news and updates in some of the murder cases we cover. In this episode, we'll talk about cases from Alabama, Idaho, Missouri, and Ohio, as well as nation-wide, across the United States of America. Associated Press's reporting on the murders of Idaho firefighters John Morrison and Frank Harwood and the wounding of David Tysdal: https://www.boston.com/news/national-news/2025/07/01/idaho-ambush-suspect-wess-roley/Fox 11's reporting on the murders of Idaho firefighters John Morrison and Frank Harwood and the wounding of David Tysdal: https://fox11online.com/news/local/neenah-high-school-alum-among-firefighters-killed-in-idaho-ambush-frank-harwood-wisconsin-coeur-dalene-kootenai-county-battalion-john-morrison-wess-roley-brush-fire-dave-tysdalThe Spokesman-Review's reporting on the murders of Idaho firefighters John Morrison and Frank Harwood and the wounding of David Tysdal: https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/jun/30/suspect-in-idaho-firefighter-killings-identified-a/Fox News's report on the charges against Jordan Willis and Ivory Carson in the deaths of Ricky Johnson, David Harrington, and Clayton McGeeney: https://www.foxnews.com/us/kansas-city-chiefs-fans-deaths-prosecutors-seek-tougher-chargesUSA Today's report on the charges against Jordan Willis and Ivory Carson in the deaths of Ricky Johnson, David Harrington, and Clayton McGeeney:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/06/27/kansas-city-chiefs-fans-death-murder-charge/84387725007/People's report on the charges against Jordan Willis and Ivory Carson in the deaths of Ricky Johnson, David Harrington, and Clayton McGeeney: https://people.com/why-chiefs-fans-friend-is-now-charged-with-murder-exclusive-quotes-11763812The Sandusky Register's report on the case of true crime podcaster Ashli Ford and her attorney: https://sanduskyregister.com/news/595034/attorney-switches-sides/The Sandusky Register's report on the case of true crime podcaster Ashli Ford: https://sanduskyregister.com/news/594351/state-opposes-podcasters-motion/The Norwalk Reflector's report on the case of true crime podcaster Ashli Ford: https://norwalkreflector.com/news/589011/podcaster-takes-witness-stand/The opinion on the Michael Sockwell case in the murder of Isaiah Harris the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit: https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202313321.pdfWSFA's reporting on the Michael Sockwell case in the murder of Isaiah Harris: https://www.wsfa.com/2025/07/01/alabama-death-row-inmate-convicted-murder-for-hire-granted-retrial-after-3-decades/NPR's report on falling murder rates: https://www.npr.org/2025/06/30/nx-s1-5448852/murders-down-nationwide-covidPre-order our book on Delphi here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/shadow-of-the-bridge-the-delphi-murders-and-the-dark-side-of-the-american-heartland-aine-cain/21866881?ean=9781639369232Or here: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Shadow-of-the-Bridge/Aine-Cain/9781639369232Or here: https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Bridge-Murders-American-Heartland/dp/1639369236Join our Patreon here! https://www.patreon.com/c/murdersheetSupport The Murder Sheet by buying a t-shirt here: https://www.murdersheetshop.com/Check out more inclusive sizing and t-shirt and merchandising options here: https://themurdersheet.dashery.com/Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
One of the 12 jurors in the Diddy trial defends the verdicts they reached amid speculation they were influenced by Diddy’s celebrity. Amy and T.J. discuss that juror’s outrage and talk about new details from “George,” the alternate juror who said the freak-off videos they watched in court were “tame.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Deputy: In the matter of USA v. Combs, how do you find the defendant, Sean Combs, for count one, racketeering conspiracy? Juror 5: Not guilty. There's a small gasp from Diddy's two rows of friends and family. Deputy: As for sex trafficking of Casandra Ventura, how do you find the defendant?Juror 5: Not guilty. Someone from the same section of the gallery says “yeah!!” It was quiet but in the tension of the courtroom it is clear that everyone heard it. His kids have broken into smiles, happily nodding. Deputy: Transportation for purposes of prostitution related to Casandra Ventura? Juror 5: Guilty. There's no reaction. Deputy: As for sex trafficking of Jane, how do you find the defendant?Juror 5: Not guilty. Teny Geragos tightly grips Sean Combs's hand across the table as the defense team exchanges positive looks. Deputy: Transportation for purposes of prostitution related to Jane? Juror 5: Guilty. As the entire courtroom stands and watches the jury leave, Combs continues to nod and clasp his hands in prayer directed towards the jurors; a silent ‘thank you.' Basically the moment the jury walk out of the room, Marc Agnifilo, Sean Combs's lead defense attorney immediately petitions the Judge. Judge: Are you proposing he just walk outside now?Agnifilo: Yes…
President Donald Trump is expected to sign his “big, beautiful, bill” tomorrow after marathon voting sessions in Congress. Florida lawmakers are raising concerns about a new migrant detention facility. Israeli strikes killed scores of Palestinians in Gaza as negotiations to reach a ceasefire ramp up. Gloomy weather could dampen some Fourth of July weekend plans. Plus, an alternate juror in Sean “Diddy” Combs' trial spoke exclusively to CNN. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Jurors agree on some, but not all, of the counts in the Sean Combs sex trafficking trial. The judge has asked jurors to continue deliberating after they said they are unable to reach a verdict on one of the five counts. What their partial verdict may say about what their final decision will be. Plus, inside President Trump's newest migrant detention center, who it will house, and the opposition to it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Biden Admin. had people acting like kings and Paula Prado joins the show to discuss the harassment she's received since the verdict was announced. Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.
Jurors in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial reach partial verdict; Senate narrowly passes Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'; High levels of bacteria causing beach closures in multiple states; and more on tonight's broadcast.
Breaking News: The jury has reached a verdict in the high-stakes trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, sending shockwaves through the courtroom and across the nation as we wait to hear Diddy's fate. After weeks of explosive testimony, high-profile witnesses, and intense legal drama, the fate of the music mogul is now sealed. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime and delivers timely breaking news cases. STS Host Joel Waldman is joined by STS #BestGuests for this breaking news special. The verdict, delivered just moments ago, could mark a pivotal turning point in Diddy's career and personal life as he faced serious charges with major consequences. This bombshell update comes amid mounting pressure and public scrutiny, and the outcome is expected to ignite massive reactions online. Stay tuned for full coverage of the Diddy trial verdict, key courtroom moments, and what this means moving forward. ⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor#breakingnews #bryankohberger #trial #truecrimecommunity #murdermystery #murdermystery2 #criminaljustice #newsupdateCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#DiddyVerdict #SeanCombsTrial #BreakingNews #HipHopNews #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #CelebrityTrial #stsnation #truecrimecommunity #trial #newsupdate #breakingnews
Breaking News: Jurors in the Sean Diddy Combs' trial have reached verdicts in all but one count. Jurors say they're stuck on the RICO charges and are now being offered modified options from attorneys. Will it be a hung jury or will jurors keep deliberating? And what are the new modifications?? Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the show that brings you the #bestguests in all of true crime. In this STS special we get you caught up on the latest trial developments, the verdict breakdown--and what the options are as jurors decide the fate of Sean Diddy Combs. Music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs is currently on verdict watch as his high-profile trial unfolds, drawing massive public and media attention. Facing serious federal charges including sex trafficking, drug distribution, and racketeering, Diddy's legal troubles have sparked widespread debate across social media and entertainment news outlets. Surviving The Survivor is closely monitoring updates on Diddy's trial, as prosecutors allege a pattern of criminal conduct spanning years. With the jury now deliberating, fans and critics alike are tuning in for the latest developments, making this one of the most talked-about celebrity trials of the year. Stay subscribed for breaking news and expert analysis on Diddy's charges and the upcoming verdict. ⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast
In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf
In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf
In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The jury begins deliberating in the Sean “Diddy” Combs racketeering trial, and a bizarre jury note raises questions about one specific juror. Bryan Kohberger takes a plea deal to avoid the death penalty. The Trump Administration declares Harvard in violation of federal civil rights law for failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students. A sweeping new EU law takes effect today, potentially allowing European regulators to pressure American tech companies to censor content globally. Riverbend Ranch: Visit https://riverbendranch.com/ | Use promo code MEGYN for $20 off your first order. Beam: Visit https://shopbeam.com/MEGYN and use code MEGYN to get an exclusive discount of up to 40% off.
There has been no shortage of activity ever since the jury began deliberating Monday. Amy and T.J. discuss the latest note from the jurors who are asking for specific testimony from two key witnesses. Meanwhile Diddy and his mom have a sweet exchange in court this morning as the anticipation grows for a verdict.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
There has been no shortage of activity ever since the jury began deliberating Monday. Amy and T.J. discuss the latest note from the jurors who are asking for specific testimony from two key witnesses. Meanwhile Diddy and his mom have a sweet exchange in court this morning as the anticipation grows for a verdict.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
There has been no shortage of activity ever since the jury began deliberating Monday. Amy and T.J. discuss the latest note from the jurors who are asking for specific testimony from two key witnesses. Meanwhile Diddy and his mom have a sweet exchange in court this morning as the anticipation grows for a verdict.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to all counts in Idaho college murders, sources say; Jurors send multiple notes to judge in first day of Sean Combs trial deliberations Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
This was recorded BEFORE Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal- Bryan Kohberger's 'Resting Killer Face': Can the Defense Overcome Juror Bias? As Bryan Kohberger's high-profile murder trial approaches, much of the discussion centers not just around evidence and legal strategies, but around Kohberger's own unsettling courtroom presence. Described by some observers as a 'resting killer face,' his cold, emotionless demeanor has sparked significant concern about its potential impact on jurors. Unlike defendants who naturally evoke sympathy or relatability, Kohberger appears detached, almost robotic—an image his defense attributes to potential autism-spectrum traits or inherent social awkwardness. But can the defense effectively counteract jurors' instinctive reactions to such a cold presentation? Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, a behavioral expert and former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, examines this challenge in depth. Robin highlights the severe risks involved in attempting to artificially change Kohberger's demeanor, cautioning that jurors are highly sensitive to disingenuous behaviors and quickly pick up on emotional manipulation. Instead, Robin suggests a far subtler, more authentic strategy: openly acknowledging Kohberger's unsettling demeanor upfront, providing jurors with a framework to interpret his emotional detachment. Could explaining his natural demeanor help neutralize its negative impact, reducing jurors' instinctive bias and suspicion? Drawing on extensive experience analyzing human behaviors under pressure—both in criminal cases and undercover FBI operations—Robin details the psychological nuances jurors subconsciously consider. He also compares Kohberger's demeanor with other infamous defendants, emphasizing how personality and social skills significantly shape jury perceptions. Listeners will gain fresh insights into why courtroom demeanor matters deeply, how subtle behaviors significantly influence jury decision-making, and why the battle for justice often hinges on perceptions formed in the courtroom rather than solely on evidence. This episode reveals why Kohberger's greatest challenge might ultimately be himself—and how skillfully addressing juror bias may determine the trial's outcome. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomBehavior #JurorBias #RobinDreeke #RestingKillerFace #BehavioralAnalysis #JuryPsychology #TrueCrimeInsights #IdahoMurders #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Diddy's Freedom & Future Hang In The Hands Of 12 Jurors Description: The closing arguments are in. The spotlight has shifted. Now, Sean “Diddy” Combs' fate rests in the hands of twelve strangers. In this episode, we dissect the prosecution's final case, the defense's controversial silence, and the mountain of explosive allegations surrounding sex trafficking, coercion, and the abuse of power. No more celebrity smoke screens—just hard evidence, courtroom drama, and a jury deciding whether one of the most powerful men in music walks free or falls hard. You'll hear expert legal insight, psychological breakdowns, and sharp commentary on how this case could redefine celebrity accountability forever. Hashtags: #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #JusticeForSurvivors #TrueCrimeBreakdown #JuryDeliberation #ClosingArguments #CelebrityTrial #SexTraffickingCase #CourtroomDrama #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Diddy's Freedom & Future Hang In The Hands Of 12 Jurors Description: The closing arguments are in. The spotlight has shifted. Now, Sean “Diddy” Combs' fate rests in the hands of twelve strangers. In this episode, we dissect the prosecution's final case, the defense's controversial silence, and the mountain of explosive allegations surrounding sex trafficking, coercion, and the abuse of power. No more celebrity smoke screens—just hard evidence, courtroom drama, and a jury deciding whether one of the most powerful men in music walks free or falls hard. You'll hear expert legal insight, psychological breakdowns, and sharp commentary on how this case could redefine celebrity accountability forever. Hashtags: #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #JusticeForSurvivors #TrueCrimeBreakdown #JuryDeliberation #ClosingArguments #CelebrityTrial #SexTraffickingCase #CourtroomDrama #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
This was recorded BEFORE Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal- Bryan Kohberger's 'Resting Killer Face': Can the Defense Overcome Juror Bias? As Bryan Kohberger's high-profile murder trial approaches, much of the discussion centers not just around evidence and legal strategies, but around Kohberger's own unsettling courtroom presence. Described by some observers as a 'resting killer face,' his cold, emotionless demeanor has sparked significant concern about its potential impact on jurors. Unlike defendants who naturally evoke sympathy or relatability, Kohberger appears detached, almost robotic—an image his defense attributes to potential autism-spectrum traits or inherent social awkwardness. But can the defense effectively counteract jurors' instinctive reactions to such a cold presentation? Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, a behavioral expert and former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, examines this challenge in depth. Robin highlights the severe risks involved in attempting to artificially change Kohberger's demeanor, cautioning that jurors are highly sensitive to disingenuous behaviors and quickly pick up on emotional manipulation. Instead, Robin suggests a far subtler, more authentic strategy: openly acknowledging Kohberger's unsettling demeanor upfront, providing jurors with a framework to interpret his emotional detachment. Could explaining his natural demeanor help neutralize its negative impact, reducing jurors' instinctive bias and suspicion? Drawing on extensive experience analyzing human behaviors under pressure—both in criminal cases and undercover FBI operations—Robin details the psychological nuances jurors subconsciously consider. He also compares Kohberger's demeanor with other infamous defendants, emphasizing how personality and social skills significantly shape jury perceptions. Listeners will gain fresh insights into why courtroom demeanor matters deeply, how subtle behaviors significantly influence jury decision-making, and why the battle for justice often hinges on perceptions formed in the courtroom rather than solely on evidence. This episode reveals why Kohberger's greatest challenge might ultimately be himself—and how skillfully addressing juror bias may determine the trial's outcome. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomBehavior #JurorBias #RobinDreeke #RestingKillerFace #BehavioralAnalysis #JuryPsychology #TrueCrimeInsights #IdahoMurders #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Jurors in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs are set to begin deliberations on Monday, June 30, marking the final and most consequential phase of a case that has gripped both the entertainment world and the legal community. After seven weeks of testimony—including 34 prosecution witnesses, graphic accounts of abuse from women like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” and surveillance footage showing Combs assaulting Cassie in 2016—the case now shifts entirely to the jury's interpretation of the facts. The 12 jurors, made up of eight men and four women, will return to court to receive final legal instructions before beginning deliberations behind closed doors. No witnesses were called by the defense, and Combs himself did not testify. Instead, his team focused on cross-examining the accusers and portraying the case as one built on exaggeration, greed, and consensual behavior taken out of context.The jury now faces the task of evaluating five serious federal charges: racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution under the Mann Act. Legal analysts note that while the Mann Act charges are more straightforward, the racketeering and trafficking counts involve far more complex determinations—requiring the jury to weigh consent versus coercion, patterns of control, and the credibility of the women who testified. The deliberations could last days or even longer, depending on how sharply divided the panel is on interpreting the law and the evidence. At stake is the question of whether one of the most powerful figures in modern music will face decades—if not life—in prison, or walk away vindicated after one of the most sensational celebrity trials in years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:At the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Trial, Jurors Are Ready to Deliberate - The New York Times
In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf
In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf
There has been no shortage of activity ever since the jury began deliberating Monday. Amy and T.J. discuss the latest note from the jurors who are asking for specific testimony from two key witnesses. Meanwhile Diddy and his mom have a sweet exchange in court this morning as the anticipation grows for a verdict.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today on the Woody and Wilcox Show: Swamp crotch can cause issues at TSA; Juror in the Diddy trial did not understand the judge's directions; Bolonga recall; Woody was finally able to cancel his Audible account; Paying for a street light; Update on the child who fell off the Disney cruise; New water slide in Japan had to close due to riders getting broken bones; It's Bobby Bonilla Day; And more!
Juror number 25 is causing some problems in the Diddy trial. Jamie tried to surprise her son by putting up a picture of San Francisco in his childhood bedroom. It didn't go as planned. Roseanne Bar was recently on a podcast talking about how she has to do things in 5s because of her OCD. This made Jamie remember someone she used to work with who had OCD.
BJ got a drone! Juror number 25 is causing some problems in the Diddy trial. Jamie tried to surprise her son by putting up a picture of San Francisco in his childhood bedroom. It didn't go as planned. Roseanne Bar was recently on a podcast talking about how she has to do things in 5s because of her OCD. This made Jamie remember someone she used to work with who had OCD. How do you like your hot dog? Did you know there is a Denver Dog?? Jamie got her car fixed about 3 weeks ago and she still hasn't picked it up. The Barry Morphew trial will start today. Have you ever walked a bee?
Normal World's Dave Landau joins us, Bryan Kohberger plea deal, Idaho sniper revealed, Diddy jury questions, Beyoncé almost died, Todd Chrisley has zero remorse, new Radio Hall of Famers, and AI is taking over. Dave Landau of Normal World drops by to promote the upcoming WATP show at The Magic Bag on September 12th. Dave's twin Mike Landau has entered public life. Here's a new question… who killed JFK? Will Smith is the corniest dude possibly ever. Watch our YouTube video right here! Beyoncé almost died at her Houston concert. Blue Ivy never smiles. Juror #25 is mucking up the Diddy trial. Todd Chrisley speaks out following his Trump pardon and takes no responsibility for his crimes. Dave is doing the up north tour. Check the dates out. Detroit Tiger P Tarik Skubal is really good at baseball. Billionaire Fallout: Charlize Theron popped off today. She's just jealous she didn't get invited to the Bezos wedding. Rosie O'Donnell is super jealous too. Oprah takes on french fried potaters. Jeff Bezos had a pajama party to show off his wife's huge rack. Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt make temperatures soar. Wess Roley is the incel Idaho sniper. He's dead now. Buy Dave Landau merch right here. Meghan Markle has been on fire on our YouTube page. Her Scam Jam source has been revealed. Mojo makes Radio Hall of Fame along with some other schmoes. Drew fills us in on Hey Beautiful: Anatomy of a Romance Scam. Robots are attacking. Robots are sexually assaulting. Bryan Kohberger accepts a plea deal. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).
Mike Crawford of the Young Jurks joins the show to talk about Karen Read and Morrissey Reelection effort. Then, it's time for Woke or Joke! Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/6U-T0fjM5MMThe post-verdict statements from jurors in the Karen Read Retrial, emphasizing the importance of juror transparency and their reasoning for the "not guilty" verdict. The jurors were described as serious, conscientious, and respectful in their deliberations, focusing on the evidence and defining each charge. There are concerns that threats and harassment against jurors could discourage future citizens from serving, suggesting that juror lists should be sealed by default to protect their privacy unless they choose to come forward.The initial, withdrawn verdict was due to one male juror having doubts at lunch, asking if he could take back his vote, but later confirming "Okay, guilty of OUI."Juror #1 aka The Foreperson, stated there was no single moment that solidified guilt, and the evidence presented was "paper-thin," failing to bring comfort to the victim's family. He highlighted the struggle to reconcile sympathy for the victim's family with the lack of sufficient evidence for a conviction. He worked really hard to make sure that all of the jurors felt heard and confident with their decision.Juror #11, addressed accusations from "internet trolls," clarifying she is an attorney in Brazil but not the US, and her interest in true crime was focused on Brazilian cases, hence her unfamiliarity with the Read case before jury duty. She expressed happiness that Karen Read would not go to jail for something she didn't do, but also anger that John O'Keefe's fate remains unknown. She also confirmed they were largely unaware of the large crowds and chanting outside the courthouse due to precautions taken by jury officers and entering through the back. This reinforces that external pressure did not influence their deliberations.Juror #12 initially leaned towards "guilty" but changed her mind after reviewing the evidence, not finding a specific piece of information she was looking for. She wouldn't share what that evidence was.An anonymous juror spoke with the media and mentioned that during deliberations, they started making more progress when they got "huge poster board paper." They then worked with other members of the jury to write down the definition of every charge on the poster board, essentially workshopping the jury instructions.Despite the challenges, jurors' willingness to speak out fosters transparency and highlights that jurors genuinely strive to make the right decisions based on the evidence presented.RESOURCESJune 24 Live Stream - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7IdKgUQoDUThe Ghislane Maxwell Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL31tnzpu6Du3wLHoQRaIq8Foreperson on w/ Today Show - https://youtu.be/nE-a9MR1oUMJuror #12 on WCVB - https://youtu.be/-Tfoc0OvOf0Anonymous Juror on NBC 10 - https://youtu.be/Vi8bkGvciaIJuror #11 on WBZ - https://youtu.be/Qx9KONKG6REThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe -...
Iran launches a restrained missile attack on U.S. bases following the U.S. bombing of its nuclear sites, signaling it may be seeking a diplomatic off-ramp. Shortly after, President Trump announces a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The Department of Homeland Security issues a terrorism advisory warning of possible cyberattacks and lone-wolf violence in response to Middle East tensions. Jurors in the Sean “Diddy” Combs trial view more explicit footage as prosecutors link evidence allegedly tying him to a criminal enterprise. New York City Democrats vote in a primary today where scandal-plagued Andrew Cuomo faces off against AOC-endorsed socialist Zohran Mamdani.Riverbend Ranch: Visit https://riverbendranch.com/ | Use promo code MEGYN for $20 off your first order. Cozy Earth: Luxury shouldn't be out of reach. Go to https://cozyearth.com/MEGYN for up to 40% off Cozy Earth's best-selling temperature-regulating sheets, apparel, and more.
US strikes Iran nuclear sites, Karen Read jurors speak, Antonio Brown's never coming back, Meghan Markle “sells out”, Chip Carey flag flub, and Corey Feldman's new Beatles-esque song. Antonio Brown never has and never will take any accountability, but his Twitter can make us laugh sometimes. Jim's Picks from last week are catching hell. Operation Midnight Hammer bombed the hell out of Iran nuclear facilities. Whoopi Goldberg has Iran's back. Sunny Hostin defends them as well. Americans tend to not want any involvement. Selena Gomez is still sad about ICE raids. MAGA Vice is destined to be a hit. Karen Read's acquittal still muffs Drew. Jurors are speaking out now about their belief that the cops conspired to frame her. The Call Sam Chopper Shop is back! Some 80-year-old man took a wrong turn in Rome and drove down the Spanish Steps. Justin Baldoni has the texts between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively. Meghan Markle remains the most insufferable woman on the Earth. She dropped some more jam and wine recently that sold out immediately. Tyler Perry may be on the down low as he's accused of financial misconduct. Lizzo is not as fat as she used to be thanks to Ozempic. Drew's still not over Brian Wilson and introduces us to Blondie Chaplin. Glenn Danzig gets some love from Drew. He was homies with Roy Orbison. Marc saw Jack White at the Detroit Tigers game. Chip Caray made an error in the broadcast booth. The New York Mets went full pride and started losing games. Fat Joe was allegedly a sexual deviant… 4,000 times. The Diddy case should be wrapping up soon. JorDon Hudson posts a thirst trap. Bill Belichick is a sweaty mess. Bill's ex HATES JorDon. Sports: Shedeur Sanders is a dangerous driver. Henry Ruggs is sorry and wants to play in the NFL again. Tyreek Hill has found a new woman to knock up. We check out some high school cheerleaders and their 9/11 tribute. Michelle Obama hate Barack so much she never wanted a son. Dean Torrence, of Dead Man's Curve fame, is complicit in Frank Sinatra Jr's kidnapping. There was an attempted mass shooting in Wayne today. A baby Black Bear gets his lid blown off (in a good way). If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).