Podcasts about jurors

After listening to 85 witnesses over the past five weeks, it appears Lindsay Clancy’s fate will be in the hands of the jury by mid-day, in a trial that has captivated the country. This morning, we will hear closing arguments from both the defense and prosecution and then jurors will be able to choose one of five verdicts, including manslaughter. Testimony concluded on Wednesday with an FBI forensic psychiatrist who testified Clancy is criminally responsible for the strangling deaths of her three young children. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #CrimeTalk #courtnews  The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is now in the hands of the jury. After weeks of testimony, prosecutors and the defense delivered sharply different closing arguments over the central question in the case: Was Lindsay Clancy criminally responsible when she killed her three children, or was she suffering from a mental disease or defect that left her legally not responsible? Prosecutors argued the killings were planned, deliberate and carried out by someone who understood that what she was doing was wrong. The defense argued Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum mental illness and psychosis that fundamentally altered her perception of reality. Jurors must now consider first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter and the issue of criminal responsibility. Scott Reisch breaks down the closing arguments, the legal instructions and the difficult decisions now facing the jury.

After listening to 85 witnesses over the past five weeks, it appears Lindsay Clancy’s fate will be in the hands of the jury by mid-day, in a trial that has captivated the country. This morning, we will hear closing arguments from both the defense and prosecution and then jurors will be able to choose one of five verdicts, including manslaughter. Testimony concluded on Wednesday with an FBI forensic psychiatrist who testified Clancy is criminally responsible for the strangling deaths of her three young children. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lindsay Clancy is on trial for the murder of her 3 kids but is she criminally responsible...or was she in psychosis and legally insane? That's the very question attorneys and jurors are discussing. Subscribe, Like & Set Alerts to "ALL" for show times & breaking news. https://www.youtube.com/@SurvivingThe... Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yr... Support the show & be a part of #STSNation: Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ... VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast Check out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/ Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor Email: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.com Surviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions. Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories. From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases. Known for having the best guest in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis.   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Days Three & Four of the Tupac murder trial In this episode, Jim break down Days 3 and 4 of the Nevada murder trial. On Day 3, former FBI Special Agent Wade Lee takes the stand and walks jurors through Davis's 1990s drug-trafficking case, federal proffer sessions, and early statements about gangs, Death Row Records, and the Tupac shooting. Former LAPD Detective Daryn Dupree follows, detailing a critical interview in which Davis allegedly made a veiled reference to the killing while investigators were focused on the murder of the Notorious B.I.G. Day 4 shifts to the heart of the prosecution's case: hours of Davis's 2008 recorded interview with detectives. Jurors hear the man himself describe riding in the white Cadillac, handing over a .40-caliber Glock, and claiming his nephew Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson fired the shots that killed Tupac. A reluctant gang-affiliated witness also appears under subpoena, underscoring the deep street code of silence that has surrounded this case for decades. Jim unpacks the key moments, the conflicting accounts, and why the prosecution is leaning so heavily on Davis's own past statements as the trial of one of hip-hop's most enduring mysteries moves forward.Timestamps:00:27 Trial Begins and Testimony Opens03:05 Proffer Details and Drug Case 11:39Biggie Task Force Evidence19:52 Gang Rivalries and Mall Fight27:19 Recorded Confession Emerges31:02 Zip Martin and the Missing Money32:40 Looking at the Defense Attorney For commercial free early releases, bonus episodes and more! https://www.patreon.com/exposedpodcastfilesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/exposed-scandalous-files-of-the-elite--6073723/support.

Something happened in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial that's harder to process than the crime itself. Jurors cried as the medical examiner walked through injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's three children. Clancy broke down sobbing at the defense table. The judge called multiple recesses. Her defense attorney, who spent three brutal hours cross-examining her psychiatrist days before, didn't ask the medical examiner a single follow-up.But it's what her husband said that's dominating conversation around this trial. Patrick Clancy took the stand and described the final morning his three children were alive — and his choice of words has people arguing.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at the family's Duxbury home. Her defense is built on undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, supported by a medication history that reads like a system failure: thirteen psychiatric prescriptions across five prescribers in four months, none of them coordinating care, a hospital that allegedly declined to treat her, a nurse practitioner who called her symptoms "quite common." Journal entries entered into the trial record document her unraveling in her own words, days before everything changed.Bob Motta watched all of it unfold ten feet from Clancy. This episode covers the testimony, the paper trail the medical system left behind, and the one line from her husband that's proving impossible to square with everything else in this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #KevinReddington

Mario Fernandez's defense can show exactly where he was on January 29, 2022: at his own rental property on Potomac Avenue in Jacksonville, meeting contractors, hauling construction materials, on camera. In the Jared Bridegan murder trial's fourth day of testimony, prosecutors used that same day against him. FBI Agent Bobby Blythe traced Henry Tenon's phone leaving that exact property and running a route through Bridegan's life — his neighborhood, his children's gymnastics facility, Jacksonville Beach — eighteen days before Bridegan was shot dead beside a tire left in the road. The state calls it a practice run launched from the defendant's own address. The defense calls it a workday.The rest of the day belonged to what investigators don't have. No DNA, fingerprints, or surveillance connect Fernandez to the blue Ford F-150. No physical evidence shows John Biggerstaff supplying him a 10mm, and records showed six 10mm purchases at a single Jacksonville gun store. Nobody ever searched the property where the truck was found — an omission detectives explained with 2023 information, disputed by the defense, that the weapon was destroyed shortly after the shooting.Fernandez is charged with first-degree murder and solicitation as the alleged hirer, and the state's proof runs through a lease, a route, and $10,000 in checks to Tenon written in the six weeks after the murder. Jurors heard Fernandez's recorded calls from the days around Tenon's arrest and his 2022 police interview calling Bridegan "a keyboard warrior more than anything." Tony Brueski breaks down which side actually won Day 4 — and why the answer depends on which job the jury thinks is on trial. Testimony runs through August 28.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #HenryTenon #ShannaGardner #JacksonvilleBeach #MurderForHire #FernandezVerdictWatch

There's a moment in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial that's harder to sit with than the autopsy testimony — and that's saying something. Jurors wept when the medical examiner described injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's three children. Clancy sobbed at the defense table and said she couldn't go through it. The judge called multiple recesses. Her attorney, who'd torn into her psychiatrist for three straight hours days before, sat silent through the medical examiner's testimony.But it's her husband's words that this episode keeps circling back to. Patrick Clancy took the stand and described the day their three children died in a way the courtroom did not expect.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at the family's Duxbury home. Her defense rests on undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, built on a paper trail that's hard to look away from: thirteen psychiatric medications from five prescribers in four months, none of them coordinating, one hospital that allegedly turned her away for being overmedicated, a nurse practitioner who called her symptoms "quite common." Her journal entries, read into the trial record, chart a woman losing her grip on her own mind days before it happened.Bob Motta was in that courtroom watching the jury process all of it in real time. This episode walks through what jurors saw, what the medical record documents, and why a husband's single description of that morning is the detail nobody's stopped talking about.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #DuxburyMA #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #KevinReddington

Another shortened day of testimony that packed a punch in the courtroom. The drama began before the one and only witness of the day, as hundreds of women all dressed in pink with messages on their t-shirts showing support for Lindsay Clancy gathered outside the courthouse for a silent rally. Jurors had to be questioned one-by-one in a sidebar with the judge per the prosecution’s request. After that, the defense put a hospital chaplain on the stand who testified Lindsay’s first words to her were that she was glad her children were safe. She also testified that Lindsay told her a voice told her if she did not follow the command neither she nor her children would be safe.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors and the world heard, for the very first time, defendant Duane Davis confessing to police who he claimed shot and killed Tupac Shakur on the Vegas Strip 30 years ago. Davis is heard on tape telling detectives about what happened that night and his role in the murder right after police assure him “Nothing you say today can be used against you” and that “nothing leaves this room” in a deal that had to anger family and friends of Shakur. Police knew ALL this time who shot and killed Shakur, and we’re only now hearing about it? Davis’ defense continues to be that their client was lying to police, lying in interviews, and lying in his memoir about his role in the crime.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors and the world heard, for the very first time, defendant Duane Davis confessing to police who he claimed shot and killed Tupac Shakur on the Vegas Strip 30 years ago. Davis is heard on tape telling detectives about what happened that night and his role in the murder right after police assure him “Nothing you say today can be used against you” and that “nothing leaves this room” in a deal that had to anger family and friends of Shakur. Police knew ALL this time who shot and killed Shakur, and we’re only now hearing about it? Davis’ defense continues to be that their client was lying to police, lying in interviews, and lying in his memoir about his role in the crime.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Another shortened day of testimony that packed a punch in the courtroom. The drama began before the one and only witness of the day, as hundreds of women all dressed in pink with messages on their t-shirts showing support for Lindsay Clancy gathered outside the courthouse for a silent rally. Jurors had to be questioned one-by-one in a sidebar with the judge per the prosecution’s request. After that, the defense put a hospital chaplain on the stand who testified Lindsay’s first words to her were that she was glad her children were safe. She also testified that Lindsay told her a voice told her if she did not follow the command neither she nor her children would be safe.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Another shortened day of testimony that packed a punch in the courtroom. The drama began before the one and only witness of the day, as hundreds of women all dressed in pink with messages on their t-shirts showing support for Lindsay Clancy gathered outside the courthouse for a silent rally. Jurors had to be questioned one-by-one in a sidebar with the judge per the prosecution’s request. After that, the defense put a hospital chaplain on the stand who testified Lindsay’s first words to her were that she was glad her children were safe. She also testified that Lindsay told her a voice told her if she did not follow the command neither she nor her children would be safe.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors and the world heard, for the very first time, defendant Duane Davis confessing to police who he claimed shot and killed Tupac Shakur on the Vegas Strip 30 years ago. Davis is heard on tape telling detectives about what happened that night and his role in the murder right after police assure him “Nothing you say today can be used against you” and that “nothing leaves this room” in a deal that had to anger family and friends of Shakur. Police knew ALL this time who shot and killed Shakur, and we’re only now hearing about it? Davis’ defense continues to be that their client was lying to police, lying in interviews, and lying in his memoir about his role in the crime.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Thursday at the Tupac Murder Trial the majority of the day was spent listening to a secret interview Duane Davis gave to police in 2008.Jurors heard Davis describe in his own words how he orchestrated the drive-by shooting that killed Tupac. The candid three hour long interview is a major part of the state's case and mirrors what Davis wrote in his 2019 memoir Compton Street Legend.Show info:Instagram: @that90spodcastEmail: 1995podcast@gmail.comSubstack: @historyofthe90s Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

For fifteen years, the government held a recording of Duane "Keffe D" Davis explaining his role in the death of Tupac Shakur, and no charge followed. The Tupac trial in Las Vegas just showed the jury why that changed.The 2008 interview ran under a proffer agreement, which Davis later called the deal of a lifetime, and it legally blocked prosecutors from building a case out of what he said in the room. On the recording, detectives tell him directly that his statements cannot be used against him. Jurors heard those assurances played back in open court.They also heard what Davis did with the protection. He described the white Cadillac, the hunt that followed his nephew's beating at the MGM Grand, the gun moving from his hand toward the back seat, and Orlando Anderson allegedly firing the shots that killed Shakur at 25. It contradicted what he told the FBI years earlier, when he denied involvement and steered investigators toward New York.Then the material stopped being secret. A detective from the interview published details in a 2011 book. Davis appeared in a BET documentary in 2018, released a memoir in February 2019, and gave paid interviews repeating the account. Prosecutors argue those public statements nullified the confidentiality, and a grand jury indicted him in September 2023. Davis pleaded not guilty, his lawyer calls the narrative fiction, and the judge admitted the tape while noting concerns about the legality of the proffer statements.True Crime Today follows the trial down to the question underneath it: whether a man everyone agrees is unreliable told the truth exactly once.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TupacShakur #KeffeD #TrueCrimeToday #DuaneDavis #TupacMurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeNews #TrialUpdate #LasVegas #2Pac

Another shortened day of testimony that packed a punch in the courtroom. The drama began before the one and only witness of the day, as hundreds of women all dressed in pink with messages on their t-shirts showing support for Lindsay Clancy gathered outside the courthouse for a silent rally. Jurors had to be questioned one-by-one in a sidebar with the judge per the prosecution’s request. After that, the defense put a hospital chaplain on the stand who testified Lindsay’s first words to her were that she was glad her children were safe. She also testified that Lindsay told her a voice told her if she did not follow the command neither she nor her children would be safe.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jurors and the world heard, for the very first time, defendant Duane Davis confessing to police who he claimed shot and killed Tupac Shakur on the Vegas Strip 30 years ago. Davis is heard on tape telling detectives about what happened that night and his role in the murder right after police assure him “Nothing you say today can be used against you” and that “nothing leaves this room” in a deal that had to anger family and friends of Shakur. Police knew ALL this time who shot and killed Shakur, and we’re only now hearing about it? Davis’ defense continues to be that their client was lying to police, lying in interviews, and lying in his memoir about his role in the crime.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A short day in court on Wednesday so there was only time to hear from two witnesses but the jury leaned a lot more about the man charged with orchestrating the 1996 drive-by shooting of Tupac Shakur.In addition to being a leader or shot caller in the Southside Crips street gang jurors also learned from two retired law enforcements officers that Duane Keefe D Davis is a convicted drug dealer who at one time bragged he had southside Compton sewn up meaning he controlled the drug traffic in that area. Show info:Instagram: @that90spodcastEmail: 1995podcast@gmail.comSubstack: @historyofthe90s Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Karmelo Anthony has scored a significant procedural victory in his fight for a new trial. The Texas judge who presided over Anthony's murder trial, State District Judge John Roach Jr., has been recused from the case after Anthony's new legal team argued that Roach's post-trial comments and other actions raised questions about whether he could fairly consider allegations that serious mistakes occurred during the original trial. Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the recusal Wednesday, and Judge Michael B. Chitty has now been assigned to the case. Anthony, now 19, was convicted in June of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a confrontation at a high-school track meet in Frisco, Texas. Jurors rejected Anthony's self-defense argument, and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Anthony's new attorneys are now asking for the entire conviction to be set aside and a new trial granted. Among their arguments are allegations involving restrictions on public and media access to the courtroom, rulings affecting Anthony's defense, and disputes surrounding what evidence could be presented to jurors. The defense also focused heavily on a television interview Roach gave shortly after the verdict in which he defended the trial and indicated agreement with the jury's decision. But this is an important distinction: Karmelo Anthony has NOT been granted a new trial. His murder conviction and 35-year sentence remain in place. What he has won is the first major battle in his post-trial challenge: the judge deciding whether serious errors occurred during John Roach's trial will no longer be John Roach himself. Scott Reisch breaks down what the judge's removal means, the arguments Anthony's attorneys are making, and whether any of them could actually be enough to get Karmelo Anthony back in front of another jury. What do you think? Was removing Judge Roach the right decision — and does Anthony have a legitimate argument for a new trial?

A psychiatric nurse practitioner named the condition out loud in 2022. Rebecca Jollotta testified she told Lindsay Clancy and her husband that Clancy might have an underlying bipolar disorder, and she prescribed an antipsychotic used to treat it. The antidepressants were not stopped.Three first-degree murder counts, three not guilty pleas. All three died at the family home on January 24, 2023. Reddington has argued postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder leave her not criminally responsible. Prosecutors say she moved deliberately and understood the consequences.Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott close the three-part series on the diagnosis itself.What pushed Jollotta toward bipolar disorder was partly Clancy's report of going forty-eight hours without sleep after starting an antidepressant. Dr. Jennifer Tufts testified she considered the same diagnosis in December 2022 and dismissed it on the absence of mania, describing the criteria as euphoria, very high energy, and grandiosity.At McLean, staff testified they observed symptoms that could indicate bipolar disorder and discussed sleep deprivation leading to a hypomanic episode. She rejected that conclusion. She left with paperwork reading major depressive disorder, severe, without psychotic features.On antidepressants and bipolar patients, the research does not agree with itself, and Shavaun says so. Jurors heard a toxicology witness describe low drug levels.Nightbird is among her published work.At McLean, Goodheart testified sleep deprivation can contribute to a manic episode and that she wanted to keep observing Clancy's sleep after discharge. Jollotta also testified Clancy's thinking stayed linear and goal-directed at every appointment, and that Clancy never indicated a plan to harm anyone. Shavaun explains why linear thinking and serious illness are not opposites.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #BipolarDisorder #HiddenKillers #Misdiagnosis #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #Antidepressants #MentalHealth #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

Alex Murdaugh's defense is asking a judge to move the retrial out of the entire fourteenth judicial circuit, and it is the motion people argue about most. Tony Brueski takes listener questions with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.The filing calls the case among the most heavily publicized criminal prosecutions in South Carolina history. It asks the court to move the trial outside the circuit where Murdaugh's family operated for generations. His great-grandfather, grandfather and father served consecutively as the region's elected solicitor from 1920 to 2006. The circuit covers five counties: Allendale, Beaufort, Colleton, Hampton and Jasper.Judge Debra McCaslin has left it to the state and the defense to discuss possible locations and bring her options. Pretrial proceedings are running out of her home court in Lexington County.The listener objection is a fair one. Documentaries, books and streaming series about this family reached the whole country, not five counties. Moving the trial also means the community where Maggie and Paul Murdaugh lived and died does not get to sit in judgment.The counterargument holds that saturation is not uniform. Jurors drawn from counties the family ran for a century carry associations jurors elsewhere do not. That is the standard a venue motion is measured against.The defense's other pending filings include a demand for a fresh Brady and Giglio search with written certification inside thirty days, plus a bid for independent DNA testing. McCaslin has also ruled Murdaugh will appear before the new jury in street clothes and without restraints, over the state's objection.Murdaugh's convictions were overturned, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Join the discussion now call 844-665-6548 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The defendant was convicted but it seems there might be grounds for an appeal. https://www.lehtoslaw.com

Day 11 of the Lindsay Clancy trial put her psychiatric treatment and medication history under intense scrutiny. Jurors heard extensively from psychiatric nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta, who treated Lindsay during the months before the deaths of Cora, Dawson and Callan. Jollotta testified about Lindsay's severe insomnia, anxiety, feelings of numbness and detachment, medication concerns and episodes of suicidal thinking. She said that despite Lindsay's worsening symptoms, she never observed Lindsay displaying psychosis or expressing a plan to harm her children.The defense focused heavily on possible gaps in Lindsay's care. Jollotta acknowledged that she did not obtain records from all of Lindsay's other psychiatric providers, and testimony revealed that a specialized postpartum program had concerns Lindsay might be overmedicated—information that Jollotta apparently did not receive or pursue at the time. The jury also heard about repeated medication changes, Lindsay's fear of becoming dependent on Ativan, and her increasingly desperate attempts to find something that would allow her to sleep and feel normal again.Join True Crime Squad as we break down the biggest moments from Day 11, the testimony of Lindsay's psychiatric providers, Kevin Reddington's cross-examination, the questions surrounding coordination of her care, and what this evidence means for the central issue facing the jury: Was Lindsay Clancy criminally responsible, or had her mental illness deteriorated to the point that she could no longer appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions?

The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023, moved into medical territory today. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and defense attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Jurors heard from Julie Paul, one of Clancy's psychiatric nurse practitioners, who was cross-examined by Reddington — the key point being whether Clancy had Paul's personal cell number, which she confirmed. Then Rebecca Jollotta, certified by Postpartum Support International, described taking over Clancy's care after Paul departed the clinic. Jollotta testified to multiple medication changes, weight loss, and poor sleep, but was clear on what she didn't see: no mania, no psychosis, no suicidal or homicidal ideation. She also flagged that the medication trials were cut short rather than run the standard four weeks. Prosecutors pointed to a specific outreach from Clancy to Jollotta — concern about becoming dependent on Ativan and about intrusive thoughts — as evidence Clancy understood her own mental state.Clancy allegedly attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window after the killings and remains paralyzed from the waist down. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court and is expected to run several weeks.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerContent on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.Hashtags#LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

A defense attorney refused a sidebar at the Lindsay Clancy trial and accused prosecutors, in open court, of getting caught on a hot mic. What Kevin Reddington says they said, and what the district attorney's office says was actually whispered, opens Day 9 of the most closely watched murder trial in Massachusetts. True Crime Today takes you inside the whole day. The accusation traces to testimony about the autopsy of eight-month-old Callan, when Lindsay Clancy sobbed and was wheeled out as a whisper hit the livestream microphone. The DA's office reviewed the video and says the words were about a courtroom monitor, not the defendant. Judge William Sullivan answered with a blunt warning: microphones are everywhere, and anyone caught commenting is out. Then the day got heavier. Two psychiatrists who treated Clancy before January 24, 2023 testified for the prosecution, and one of them described the day before her children died in exactly two words. The other admitted on cross that she has never treated the illness Clancy's defense is built on. Jurors also heard from the woman who ran the club playroom where Cora and Dawson waited for their mother, and from a friend who asked Lindsay how she was doing at a bonfire two days before the deaths. She answered that she was good. Tony connects the chaos to the substance, and what the fight over three whispered words has to do with the two words that matter most in this courtroom. Cross-examination resumes August 10, and the witness coming back is the doctor who saw her last.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #DuxburyMassachusetts #MurderTrial #CourtroomTestimony #TrueCrimeCommunity #JusticeSystem

Day 9 of the Lindsay Clancy trial shifted heavily into the psychiatric treatment Lindsay received in the weeks and months before the deaths of Cora, Dawson and Callan. Jurors heard from Dr. Alia Goodheart of McLean Hospital and Dr. Jennifer Tufts, Lindsay's outpatient psychiatrist, about her worsening depression, anxiety, severe insomnia, suicidal thoughts, medication changes and whether she ever displayed signs of psychosis. Both doctors testified that they did not observe Lindsay to be psychotic during the periods they treated her.The defense challenged those assessments, focusing on Lindsay's escalating symptoms, her calls to a suicide hotline, medication changes and the adequacy of her psychiatric care. Dr. Goodheart testified that Lindsay was considered a low/minimal safety risk when discharged from McLean, while Dr. Tufts described Lindsay as “depressed and flat” just one day before the killings, although Lindsay denied suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Tufts' testimony continued into Day 10.Join True Crime Squad as we break down the crucial psychiatric testimony from Day 9, the prosecution and defense questioning, Lindsay's treatment history and what these doctors' observations could mean for the central question of the trial: Was Lindsay Clancy criminally responsible for killing her children, or was she suffering from a mental illness severe enough to meet Massachusetts' standard for lack of criminal responsibility?

Two people, two very different amounts of help, and one comparison the internet keeps making that doesn't actually hold up. Nick Reiner told reporters he went through somewhere around seventeen rehab stays between age fifteen and twenty-two, all arranged and paid for by his family, plus a yearlong conservatorship. He's now charged with killing his parents, Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner, and has pleaded not guilty. Lindsay Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General, sought care once, in December of 2022, and was discharged from a postpartum program after a single day. She's now on trial in Plymouth Superior Court for killing her three children, and this week's testimony didn't make the picture simpler. Patrick Clancy spent two days on the stand. Jurors heard his 911 call. First responders described the scene. Then prosecutors set nine prescription bottles in front of the jury — most of them still holding pills — directly undercutting a defense built around a woman overwhelmed by medication. Prosecutors also keep returning to a twenty-five-minute errand and a takeout order, asking jurors to weigh whether either one fits with a woman too sick to know what she was doing. Tony Brueski breaks down why stacking these two cases together as the same story is exactly how neither gets fixed — one person given nearly two decades of intervention, one given a single day, and both families now living with the same unanswerable question about who could have stopped it. Reiner has pleaded not guilty and no motive has been officially confirmed. Clancy's jury has not returned a verdict, and prosecutors argue she acted intentionally and should be held criminally responsible. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #NickReiner #TrueCrimeToday #PatrickClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #RobReiner Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

A father takes the stand for the prosecution — then sues the doctors instead. That's where the Lindsay Clancy murder trial stands after its first week in Plymouth Superior Court, and it's not the story anyone expected walking in. Patrick Clancy testified that the day before his three children died, Lindsay seemed fine — she built a snowman with them, texted normally, gave no outward sign anything was wrong. Prosecutors are using that testimony to argue she was rational enough to plan what came next. Jurors also heard a seven-minute 911 call, saw pajamas and exercise bands entered as evidence, and learned about a fourteen-second phone call Patrick received after the children were already dead, with no idea anything had happened. But the defense pulled a different thread on cross-examination. Lindsay had checked into McLean Hospital on New Year's Eve. She'd been to the ER. She'd told providers, repeatedly, about intrusive thoughts involving her own children — and Women and Infants Hospital had already flagged overmedication and a possible misdiagnosis that nobody followed up on. Now here's the twist: Patrick and Lindsay have both filed separate civil lawsuits against the healthcare providers who treated her. The same man who testified against his wife is, outside the courtroom, blaming the medical system for what happened. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to break down what it means for a jury to hear both stories at once, and whether a case built on "she seemed fine" can survive a father who doesn't seem to believe it either. They also unpack ADA Buckingham's opening line — that people with mental illness commit crimes every day and are still responsible — and whether the jury will still buy it after cross. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Here's what the prosecution didn't count on in the Lindsay Clancy trial: their own witness might be their biggest problem. Patrick Clancy took the stand in Plymouth Superior Court to help the state prove his wife was rational enough to plan what happened to their three children. He described one of her best days — a snowman, normal texts, nothing that looked like a woman in crisis. Prosecutors leaned into it hard. Jurors sat through a seven-minute 911 call. They saw the pajamas. They saw the exercise bands. They heard about the fourteen-second phone call Patrick got after the children were already gone, a call where he had no idea anything had happened. Then cross-examination flipped the room. Lindsay had checked herself into McLean Hospital on New Year's Eve. She'd gone to the ER. She'd told providers, more than once, about intrusive thoughts involving her own children. And Women and Infants Hospital had already flagged overmedication and a possible misdiagnosis — a warning that went nowhere. And then came the detail nobody in that courtroom saw coming: Patrick Clancy filed a civil lawsuit against the doctors. Lindsay filed her own, separately. The father who just testified for the prosecution is, outside those courtroom doors, telling a different story about who's actually responsible. Tony Brueski sits down live with criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries to go through it in real time — what ADA Buckingham's opening statement bet on, what the defense pulled out of Patrick on cross, and whether a jury asked to judge a mother's mind can ignore what her own husband believes happened to her. They also get into how Massachusetts law defines criminal responsibility for someone the state's own witness may not fully believe was in control. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

The prosecution called a total of 10 witnesses to the stand on Thursday, but the day began with an emotional gut punch as the state medical examiner went over the autopsy of 8 month old Callan. Jurors had to view the autopsy photo which prompted tears and tissues among the jury and audible sobbing from Lindsay Clancy. The prosecution then had a series of witnesses take the stand from the family pediatrician, daycare workers, and friends of the couple testify that Lindsay was tired, but a good and loving mom. Lindsay’s ex father-in-law and grandfather to the children testified that the Clancy’s were an “all American family” and he never was concerned that Lindsay could harm herself or the kids.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The prosecution called a total of 10 witnesses to the stand on Thursday, but the day began with an emotional gut punch as the state medical examiner went over the autopsy of 8 month old Callan. Jurors had to view the autopsy photo which prompted tears and tissues among the jury and audible sobbing from Lindsay Clancy. The prosecution then had a series of witnesses take the stand from the family pediatrician, daycare workers, and friends of the couple testify that Lindsay was tired, but a good and loving mom. Lindsay’s ex father-in-law and grandfather to the children testified that the Clancy’s were an “all American family” and he never was concerned that Lindsay could harm herself or the kids.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The prosecution called a total of 10 witnesses to the stand on Thursday, but the day began with an emotional gut punch as the state medical examiner went over the autopsy of 8 month old Callan. Jurors had to view the autopsy photo which prompted tears and tissues among the jury and audible sobbing from Lindsay Clancy. The prosecution then had a series of witnesses take the stand from the family pediatrician, daycare workers, and friends of the couple testify that Lindsay was tired, but a good and loving mom. Lindsay’s ex father-in-law and grandfather to the children testified that the Clancy’s were an “all American family” and he never was concerned that Lindsay could harm herself or the kids.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The prosecution called a total of 10 witnesses to the stand on Thursday, but the day began with an emotional gut punch as the state medical examiner went over the autopsy of 8 month old Callan. Jurors had to view the autopsy photo which prompted tears and tissues among the jury and audible sobbing from Lindsay Clancy. The prosecution then had a series of witnesses take the stand from the family pediatrician, daycare workers, and friends of the couple testify that Lindsay was tired, but a good and loving mom. Lindsay’s ex father-in-law and grandfather to the children testified that the Clancy’s were an “all American family” and he never was concerned that Lindsay could harm herself or the kids.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Two witnesses, two completely different pictures of Lindsay Clancy — that's what jurors got in Plymouth Superior Court this week in the trial of the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan, with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy is facing three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, with defense attorney Kevin Reddington arguing she was gripped by severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication when it happened.Kyle Carney, a friend of Patrick Clancy's, opened the day describing January 24 as ordinary — a good day, nothing that hinted at what was coming. Then Massachusetts State Police Trooper Andrew Chiachio took over, and the testimony got a lot more procedural and a lot more pointed. He walked the jury through pulling surveillance video from a CVS and Three V Restaurant near the scene, then described a search warrant executed six months after the killings to collect possible DNA evidence from outside the house. A second warrant went after Facebook, where investigators found a May 2021 post from a parenting support group in which Clancy wrote that every day with Dawson felt like a fight. Reddington, on cross, got Chiachio to concede that despite the digging, investigators never found any evidence Clancy had actually abused her son. Jurors were dismissed once both witnesses finished.Prosecutors are expected to argue Clancy knew exactly what she was doing that day, mental-health defense or not. She allegedly attempted suicide afterward by jumping from a second-story window and remains paralyzed from the waist down. Her husband, Patrick, was running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues for several more weeks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health, or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

Day 8 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial brought some of the most emotional testimony of the trial as jurors heard detailed medical evidence about the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy. Dr. Kimberley Springer of the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner testified about the children's autopsies, causes of death, and injuries. Lindsay became visibly distraught during testimony concerning 8-month-old Callan, prompting a courtroom recess. Jurors also heard from people close to the Clancy family who described Lindsay as a loving mother while providing important testimony about her mental health and behavior before January 24, 2023.Join True Crime Squad as we break down the major testimony from Day 8, the prosecution's strategy, Kevin Reddington's cross-examinations, and the evidence that mattered most. As the Commonwealth moves closer to the crucial psychiatric evidence, we'll examine how today's testimony fits into the central battle of the Lindsay Clancy trial: whether she was criminally responsible for killing her three children or whether severe mental illness and postpartum psychosis left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimeSquad #CourtroomCoverage #Massachusetts

In Part 2 of this father-daughter conversation, trial attorneys John Simon and Mary Simon continue exploring what truly drives jury decision-making. Through real courtroom stories and side-by-side scenarios, John explains why a defendant's conduct, credibility, and character often matter as much as the injuries themselves. Together, they discuss why jurors don't simply calculate damages—they make human judgments about responsibility, accountability, and whether someone has earned their trust.

Day 6 of the Lindsay Clancy trial focused on forensic evidence, toxicology, and Lindsay Clancy speaking in court for the first time. Jurors heard testimony about blood evidence, DNA, the exercise bands used in the killings, and toxicology results showing prescribed medications but no illegal drugs. Lindsay also agreed to stipulate to certain forensic facts, streamlining part of the prosecution's case.We'll break down today's key witnesses, what the forensic evidence may mean for both the prosecution and defense, and how today's testimony fits into the larger battle over criminal responsibility and Lindsay Clancy's mental state at the time of the killings.

Day 7 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial featured powerful testimony from the family's former nanny, additional forensic evidence, and continued medical testimony as prosecutors worked to strengthen their case. Former nanny Elaine Rossi told jurors Lindsay Clancy was a "wonderful mother" who deeply loved her children and never gave her reason to worry about their safety. Jurors also watched a home video of baby Callan that Rossi had recorded, creating one of the most emotional moments of the trial. The prosecution also presented DNA and toxicology evidence while medical witnesses testified about Lindsay's injuries and treatment following the events of January 24, 2023.Join True Crime Squad as we break down every major moment from Day 7, including the nanny's testimony, the forensic evidence presented to the jury, the key cross-examinations, and what today's testimony means for both the prosecution and the defense. We also discuss how the Commonwealth is building its case before the expected battle between psychiatric experts over whether Lindsay Clancy was legally criminally responsible or suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time of the deaths of her three children.

Officer Richard Lippard of the Duxbury Police Department testified that he spent sixteen hours in a hospital hallway watching Lindsay Clancy lie motionless. She was sedated and unconscious at South Shore Hospital, then MedFlighted to Brigham and Women's in Boston. She never spoke a word during his entire watch. Under cross-examination, Lippard confirmed that a Code Blue was called for her room overnight — meaning she was dead or dying.The testimony came on Day 4 of Clancy's murder trial after the jury walked through the family's former home at 47 Summer Street in Duxbury. Jurors inspected the basement, both floors, and the exterior — including the second-story window and the yard below it. A detective who met Clancy at the hospital described her as sedated and unconscious with deep lacerations across her neck and wrists. Photographs of the injuries and blood in the bedroom were shown to the jury.Two emergency room doctors then testified about treating three-year-old Dawson and eight-month-old Callan. Dawson was worked on for forty minutes before being declared dead. Callan's heart was restarted but he never regained brain function and died at Boston Children's Hospital days later. Clancy was visibly emotional as both doctors described the effort.Every witness Friday was a prosecution witness. And the prosecution's own officer confirmed their defendant was dead or dying the same night they allege she was performing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer: This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CodeBlue #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #JuryTrial

GRAPHIC TESTIMONY @ 00:36-4:12 In today's testimony, jurors heard from doctors who treated Callan and Cora,  then trauma ICU nurses about Lindsay Clancy's critical condition after she was transferred following the January 24, 2023 incident.The nurses described Lindsay arriving at the ICU as critically injured and considered a self-harm risk. Shortly after arrival, Lindsay suffered cardiac arrest after her blood pressure dropped. Medical staff performed CPR, administered medications to support her blood pressure, placed chest tubes, and began blood transfusions.The testimony covered the severity of Lindsay's injuries, including spinal fractures, a thoracic spine injury described as a transection, rib fractures, thyroid swelling, blood loss, and wounds to her wrists and neck. Nurses testified about the medical treatment she received, her time on a ventilator, and her gradual recovery.Jurors also heard about Lindsay's behavior while in the ICU, including her confusion after being extubated, what doctors described as ICU delirium, her need for restraints while recovering, and her ability to follow commands and communicate through writing.The last witness before lunch was a psychiatrist who testified about discussions surrounding Lindsay's mental health history, and how she changed her healthcare proxy from Patrick Clancy to her parents.This testimony provided a detailed look at Lindsay's medical condition, the extent of her injuries, and her recovery during her hospitalization.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial reached its third day of testimony with first responders taking the stand and the jury set to visit the Duxbury home where three children died. But the moment that reshaped the conversation happened earlier in the week — when prosecutors walked nine prescription bottles past the jury and most of them still had pills inside.The defense says Lindsay Clancy was overmedicated by providers who failed her. Patrick Clancy described thirteen different medications, a Seroquel spiral, and a woman who begged for help that never came. But prosecutors want the jury looking at what was still in those bottles.Tony takes on the ten questions this audience cannot stop asking — from the medications to the 911 call to whether the medical system that prescribed those drugs belongs on trial. Everything you wanted to know. No holding back.End Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #MurderTrial #PlymouthCourt #ListenerQA #HiddenKillers

Officer Richard Lippard of the Duxbury Police Department testified that he spent sixteen hours in a hospital hallway watching Lindsay Clancy lie motionless. She was sedated and unconscious at South Shore Hospital, then MedFlighted to Brigham and Women's in Boston. She never spoke a word during his entire watch. Under cross-examination, Lippard confirmed that a Code Blue was called for her room overnight — meaning she was dead or dying.The testimony came on Day 4 of Clancy's murder trial after the jury walked through the family's former home at 47 Summer Street in Duxbury. Jurors inspected the basement, both floors, and the exterior — including the second-story window and the yard below it. A detective who met Clancy at the hospital described her as sedated and unconscious with deep lacerations across her neck and wrists. Photographs of the injuries and blood in the bedroom were shown to the jury.Two emergency room doctors then testified about treating three-year-old Dawson and eight-month-old Callan. Dawson was worked on for forty minutes before being declared dead. Callan's heart was restarted but he never regained brain function and died at Boston Children's Hospital days later. Clancy was visibly emotional as both doctors described the effort.Every witness Friday was a prosecution witness. And the prosecution's own officer confirmed their defendant was dead or dying the same night they allege she was performing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer: This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CodeBlue #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #JuryTrial

Day 5 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial focused on Lindsay Clancy's own journals, evidence recovered from the family home, and testimony about her physical and psychiatric condition after the deaths of her three children. Jurors heard entries describing anxiety, insomnia, feeling overwhelmed, difficulty bonding with her infant son, and repeated efforts to get help as prosecutors continued building their case that she was criminally responsible.The jury also heard from police investigators, medical personnel, and hospital psychiatrists who treated Clancy after her suicide attempt. Testimony addressed the collection of medications and toxicology evidence, emergency efforts to save the children, Lindsay's written communication while intubated, and whether a person experiencing psychosis can still appear coherent, communicate, and make plans. Join True Crime Squad for a complete breakdown of the Day 5 testimony, key cross-examinations, courtroom strategy, and what today's evidence could mean for the prosecution's case and the defense claim of postpartum psychosis.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #Day5 #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #CourtroomCoverage #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeSquad #MassachusettsTrial #CourtNewsJoin our squad! Kristi and Katie share true crime stories and give you actionable things you can do to help, all with a wicked sense of humor.Follow our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadFollow our True Crime Trials Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadTrialsWant to Support our work and get perks like extra content and The Watch Party? www.truecrimesquad.com*Social Media Links*Facebook: www.facebook.com/truecrimesquadFacebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/215774426330767Website: https://www.truecrimesquad.comTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@truecrimesquadBlueSky- https://bsky.app/profile/truecrimesquad.bsky.social True Crime Squad on Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5gIPqBHJLftbXdRgs1Bqm1

Day 4 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial brought some of the most emotional testimony yet as emergency room physicians described their desperate efforts to save 8-month-old Callan and 3-year-old Dawson after they were rushed to the hospital. Jurors also left the courthouse to visit the Clancy family's former Duxbury home, retracing the route Patrick Clancy drove the night of the killings and viewing the locations central to the prosecution's timeline. Lindsay Clancy became visibly emotional during portions of the medical testimony as prosecutors continued building their case that the killings were intentional, while the defense maintains she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and lacked criminal responsibility.

Jurors in Plymouth Superior Court heard from five witnesses today in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and is mounting an insanity defense through attorney Kevin Reddington centered on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Duxbury Police Officers Mark Anthony Maffeo and Richard Lippard testified about the scene they responded to and Clancy's condition when they got there. Emergency physicians Dr. Mark Josephtenerowicz and Dr. Benjamin Kaufman followed, laying out her health on arrival at the hospital alongside the injuries the children had sustained. Lab Supervisor Melissa Arcadipane closed out the day with testimony on the clinical processing that followed.It's the kind of testimony that doesn't need a narrator to make it hit — officers and doctors just describing what they saw and treated, one after another. That's the prosecution's strategy in a case like this: no theatrics, just a documented record for the jury to sit with before the defense makes its case for a mind that wasn't working right. Clancy is now paralyzed from the waist down after allegedly jumping from a second-story window following the killings. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. Judge William F. Sullivan is presiding, with ADAs Jennifer Sprague and Shanan Buckingham prosecuting.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer: Content on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial visit the Duxbury home where the Massachusetts mother allegedly strangled her three young children before attempting to take her own life. Nineteen-year-old Amish man pleads guilty to aggravated murder after smothering a woman and offering to help her family prepare for her funeral. Testimony begins in New York trial of a father accused of drowning his nine-year-old daughter during a vacation, then reporting her kidnapped. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After murdering her pregnant friend Reagan Hancock and abducting her unborn daughter, Taylor Parker faced overwhelming evidence against her. But instead of accepting responsibility, prosecutors say she spent her time in jail inventing increasingly elaborate stories, manipulating fellow inmates, and trying to convince anyone who would listen that she had been framed. Jurors heard testimony from prison staff, therapists, and inmates who described Parker as unusually intelligent, highly manipulative, and completely lacking remorse. She allegedly forged fake confessions, recruited inmates into bizarre escape plans, blamed imaginary gangs for the murder, and even tried to create false eyewitnesses who could support her ever-changing versions of events. By the time Taylor Parker's trial came to an end, prosecutors argued that her behavior behind bars revealed just how dangerous she truly was. The jury ultimately agreed, sentencing her to death for the brutal murder of Reagan Hancock and her unborn daughter, Braxlynn, a decision shaped not only by the crime itself, but by everything Parker did after her arrest. #TrueCrimeRecaps #TaylorParker #ReaganHancock #BraxlynnHancock #TaylorParkerCase #Members Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The family that reported Joseph Duggar to police has lost almost everything, and understanding why starts with how this family actually operates. Joseph, thirty-one, is facing two felony counts in Florida connected to what happened to a child during a 2020 family vacation. He's pleaded not guilty, but the arrest affidavit says he admitted what happened twice, once to the child's father and once to detectives on a monitored call. His parents posted his bond. The people who went to police instead of keeping it quiet were his own in-laws, the Caldwells, a Baptist pastor's family who broke a two-decade pattern of handling everything inside the house. What that decision has cost them is coming in this episode.  While that plays out in Florida, Josh Duggar is generating his own headlines from inside federal prison. He's been transferred through four facilities in three states, and the Bureau of Prisons hasn't explained why. His attorney calls the moves retaliation for complaints about opened legal mail. Whatever the reason, his release date keeps sliding in one direction only: originally August 2032, revised three times since, now sitting at February 2, 2033. Jurors at his trial already heard how far he was willing to go to dodge accountability, including a hidden operating system built specifically to defeat the monitoring software his wife was using on him.  Now there's a 2025 motion, filed from behind bars, and his own sisters are named in it. What Josh Duggar is claiming about them, and what he wants a court to do about it, is the thread tying this whole episode together. Two Duggar sons, two courtrooms, and the same family instinct showing up in both: protect the name first, and worry about who gets hurt along the way second. Links Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #JosephDuggar #JoshDuggar #TrueCrimeToday #DuggarFamily #CaldwellFamily #19KidsAndCounting #DuggarNews #CountingOn #JimBobDuggar #TrueCrime