Podcasts about Yandex

Make it Louder! Episode 554 of Make Some Music radio show with your host - Ruslan Radriges ♪ New track with Annie Sollange "Desert Heart" ► interplayrec.band.link/itp382 ♪ Discover this episode: ► band.link/msm554 Also new music by Ruslan Radriges in playlist. Subscribe: ► soundcloud.com/ruslanradriges/sets/rrmusic Follow Ruslan Radriges: ♦Instagram ► instagram.com/ruslanradriges ♦Spotify ► spoti.fi/2pRImzg ♦Facebook ► facebook.com/RuslanRadriges ♦YouTube ► youtube.com/c/DjProduserRuslanRadriges ♦VK ► vk.com/ruslanradriges ♦Apple ► music.apple.com/ru/artist/ruslan-radriges/541431482 ♦SoundCloud: ► @ruslanradriges ♦Yandex ► music.yandex.ru/artist/3961521 #RuslanRadriges #MSM554 TRACKLIST: Ruslan Radriges - Intro 01. Maxim Lany & VIKTOR - Circles [Smash The House] [SOME LATELY FAVORITE] 02. Ruslan Radriges & Annie Sollange - Desert Heart [Interplay] 03. MARE x MissingR x Los Padres - Insomnia (Afro Edit) [TBA] 04. NORII x Fedo x Dave Suarez - Can U Feel It [On The Way] 05. Ayda - Supernova [2Rock] 06. Monde & Soukri - Running Out [Forever Young] 07. Vaja - People Are People (Alexander Turok Remix) [2Rock] 08. Firebeatz - Charged Up [STMPD] [MOMENT OF THE PAST] 09. Vigel - Sirenes 10. Mangoo & Steerner ft. Bertie Scott - All That I Need [Future House Music] 11. Roman Messer - Serendipity [Suanda] 12. Alexander Spark & RYDEX - Interstellar [Interplay] [PERFECT TUNE] 13. A.R.D.I. - Silence In Your Eyes [Sub Mission] 14. NAEMS - Kabuki [Kurai] 15. Mazdem - Surrender [Arryba] 16. MATTN & Mairee - Dodo [Smash The House] 17. ZYNOX - Energy [Revealed] 18. Paul Oakenfold x Planet Perfecto Knights x KIMMIC - ResuRection [Perfecto] 19. Riot Ten - I Hate EDM (Riot Ten & RAVEPUNK9000 VIP) [Thrive Music] Ruslan Radriges - Outro

Make it Louder! Episode 553 of Make Some Music radio show with your host - Ruslan Radriges ♪ New track with Alexander Turok "Step Into The Night" ► 2rock.ffm.to/0277 ♪ Discover this episode: ► band.link/msm553 Also new music by Ruslan Radriges in playlist. Subscribe: ► soundcloud.com/ruslanradriges/sets/rrmusic Follow Ruslan Radriges: ♦Instagram ► instagram.com/ruslanradriges ♦Spotify ► spoti.fi/2pRImzg ♦Facebook ► facebook.com/RuslanRadriges ♦YouTube ► youtube.com/c/DjProduserRuslanRadriges ♦VK ► vk.com/ruslanradriges ♦Apple ► music.apple.com/ru/artist/ruslan-radriges/541431482 ♦SoundCloud: ► @ruslanradriges ♦Yandex ► music.yandex.ru/artist/3961521 #RuslanRadriges #MSM553 TRACKLIST: Ruslan Radriges - Intro [PERFECT TUNE] 01. Ruslan Radriges & Annie Sollange - Desert Heart [Interplay] 02. Arte ft. Neeve - With You 03. Eximinds - Rising From The Depths [Hypersia] 04. Skytech - The Rhythm [STMPD] 05. Martin Jensen x Sami Brielle x Carrie Keller x Hektor Mass - YES, PLEASE [One Seven] 06. Vaja - People Are People (Alexander Turok Remix) [2Rock] 07. Miguel Brooker - Raza [Arryba] 08. CRUPO & MBP - Nonstop [Crash Your Sound] 09. Fredy Lane - Wait For You [Honua] 10. Anton By & AV - Need It [Interplay] [SOME LATELY FAVORITE] 11. PLS&TY & x.o.anne - Leave The Light On [Dim Mak] [MOMENT OF THE PAST] 12. Ruslan Radriges - Cosmos 13. Alexander Komarov - Nostalgie [Abora] 14. Matt Dybal x Kohey x TRID3NT - All You've Got [Revealed] 15. Maestro Dabici & OnEdge - Lift You Up [Exetra] 16. Cuebrick & Niels Van Gogh - Hold Me Tonight [Revealed] 17. DJSM & Molly Mae - Crowded Room [Bounce & Bass] 18. Ozgun & Jake Ryan - Infinity [Kurai] 19. Nifra - Madness [Revealed] Ruslan Radriges - Outro

Dans cet épisode bonus, je vous partage un extrait de l'étude "AI Chatbots vs Search Engines: 24-Month Study on Traffic Trends" par Sujan Sarkar, OneLittleWeb d'avril 2025.Le sujet m"intéresse et aurait été trop long à restranscrire dans un épisode complet. Aussi, j'ai créé cet épisode avec l'aide avec NotebookLM de Google pour les voix et le résumé ci-dessous : Cette étude de OneLittleWeb analyse deux années complètes de données de trafic web mondial pour comparer les 10 principaux moteurs de recherche et les 10 principaux chatbots IA. Basée sur des données SEMrush et aitools.xyz d'avril 2023 à mars 2025, l'étude examine la croissance, les changements de comportement des utilisateurs et la bataille émergente entre la recherche classique et l'IA conversationnelle. La conclusion principale est que les chatbots IA ne remplacent pas les moteurs de recherche traditionnels, mais qu'ils remodèlent la manière dont les utilisateurs interagissent avec l'information en ligne. Les moteurs de recherche s'adaptent en intégrant des fonctionnalités d'IA, tandis que les chatbots se taillent une niche pour des tâches spécifiques.Croissance explosive des Chatbots IA, mais écart persistant avec les moteurs de recherche Les chatbots IA ont connu une croissance remarquable de leur trafic, avec une augmentation de 80,92 % en glissement annuel (avril 2024 à mars 2025), totalisant 55,2 milliards de visites.Malgré cette croissance rapide, le trafic des chatbots représente une fraction très faible de celui des moteurs de recherche. Sur l'année écoulée (avril 2024 à mars 2025), le trafic des chatbots ne représentait que 2,96 % des visites totales des moteurs de recherche, soit 34 fois moins de visites.En mars 2025, l'écart en termes d'engagement quotidien était encore plus marqué : les moteurs de recherche atteignaient en moyenne 5,5 milliards de visites par jour, tandis que les chatbots n'en totalisaient que 233,1 millions, soit un écart de près de 24X."Even with this growth, chatbot traffic was only about 1/34th of search engine traffic over the past year.""On any given day, users interact with search engines nearly 24 times more than they do with chatbots."Déclin marginal du trafic des moteurs de recherche, suivi d'un rebond alimenté par l'IA Les moteurs de recherche ont connu un léger déclin de 0,51 % en glissement annuel (avril 2024 à mars 2025), avec des visites totales tombant à 1,86 billions.Cependant, l'analyse mois par mois révèle une image plus nuancée. Après un creux en juin 2024, le trafic des moteurs de recherche a steadily augmenté à partir de la fin de 2024, atteignant un sommet pour la période récente en mars 2025 (163,7 milliards).Ce rebond est potentiellement dû à l'intégration de fonctionnalités d'IA dans les plateformes de recherche traditionnelles."Despite a modest annual decline, search engine usage is rebounding strongly, possibly fueled by the increasing adoption of AI within the platforms themselves."Domination du marché : Google et ChatGPT mènent leurs secteurs respectifs Le marché des chatbots IA est massivement dominé par ChatGPT, détenant une part de marché écrasante de 86,32 %.Dans l'espace des moteurs de recherche, Google reste le leader incontesté avec 87,57 % de part de marché.Malgré la croissance massive de ChatGPT, il reçoit toujours environ 26 fois moins de visites quotidiennes que Google."The AI chatbot market is dominated by ChatGPT, holding an overwhelming 86.32% market share.""In the search engine space, Google remains the undisputed leader with 87.57% market share.""Despite ChatGPT's massive growth and high engagement, it still receives approximately 26 times less daily traffic than Google."Acteurs émergents dans l'espace des Chatbots IA : DeepSeek et Grok DeepSeek et Grok ont montré une croissance rapide.DeepSeek a connu une augmentation de trafic stupéfiante de 113007 % en glissement annuel, se positionnant comme un acteur formidable.Grok a enregistré une croissance de 353 787,60 % en glissement annuel, atteignant 5,3 millions de visites quotidiennes en mars 2025, dépassant plusieurs plateformes établies comme Gemini et Claude. Sa croissance est alimentée par la sortie de Grok-3."DeepSeek experienced a staggering surge in traffic... marking an astonishing 113007% growth.""Grok experienced a dramatic rise in traffic, reaching 216.5 million visits, a staggering 353,787.60% YoY growth..."L'IA aide les moteurs de recherche à rebrousser chemin Les moteurs de recherche comme Google et Microsoft Bing intègrent activement des fonctionnalités d'IA (telles que les AI Overviews, SGE, l'IA conversationnelle).Ces intégrations semblent avoir contribué au rebond du trafic observé en début d'année 2025.Microsoft Bing, en particulier, a vu son trafic augmenter de 27,77 % en glissement annuel, en grande partie grâce à son approche axée sur l'IA et son intégration de Copilot."Search engines like Google and Microsoft Bing are leveraging AI features like AI Overviews and Search Generative Experience (SGE), resulting in a steady increase in traffic in early 2025." "Microsoft Bing's growth trajectory reflects the ongoing impact of its AI-first approach..."Les perdants de l'évolution : Yahoo, DuckDuckGo et Baidu :Yahoo a connu un déclin significatif de 22,5 % en glissement annuel de son trafic, signalant des difficultés à rester pertinent. Son manque d'adoption rapide de l'IA est identifié comme un facteur clé.DuckDuckGo, malgré l'intégration d'AI (Duck.AI), a vu une légère baisse de 8,77 % en glissement annuel, indiquant que son focus sur la confidentialité n'est pas suffisant pour maintenir le rythme de croissance de ses concurrents.Baidu a également connu une baisse de 13,71 % en glissement annuel, bien qu'une légère reprise ait été observée en février et mars 2025 suite à l'intégration de la technologie IA de DeepSeek.AOL, bien qu'en légère reprise, manque cruellement d'intégration de l'IA dans sa fonction de recherche, ce qui représente un risque pour sa pertinence future."Yahoo's continuous decline in visits, with a 22.5% YoY decrease, highlights its struggle to remain competitive in the rapidly evolving AI-driven search engine landscape." "DuckDuckGo has continued to see a slight decline in total visits year-over-year, which contrasts with the growth seen in major search engines like Google and Bing."Les Chatbots IA se créent une niche pour des tâches spécifiques Bien que le trafic global soit plus faible, les chatbots démontrent un engagement utilisateur croissant et sont utilisés pour des tâches spécifiques.Blackbox AI (assistant de codage), Monica (agrégateur de modèles IA) et Meta AI (intégrée à l'écosystème Meta) illustrent la diversité des applications des chatbots au-delà de la simple "recherche" traditionnelle."AI chatbots have shifted from “emerging tech” to mainstream utility, with sustained upward momentum throughout the last 6 months of data."Cohabitation plutôt que remplacement La conclusion générale de l'étude est que les chatbots IA et les moteurs de recherche ne se remplacent pas, mais coexistent et évoluent ensemble.Les jeunes générations tendent à adopter les chatbots pour des requêtes conversationnelles, tandis que les générations plus âgées préfèrent la recherche traditionnelle.L'intégration de l'IA dans les moteurs de recherche les maintient pertinents."AI chatbots are not replacing traditional search engines—but they are reshaping how users interact with information online.""search engines are evolving rather than fading, integrating AI tools to offer a richer, more personalized user experience.""Search engines and AI chatbots are not in competition for supremacy—they are evolving together, with each platform enhancing the other's value."Méthodologie L'étude a analysé les 10 principaux chatbots IA (sélectionnés sur la base du trafic en mars 2025 selon AITools.xyz) et les 10 principaux moteurs de recherche (sélectionnés sur la base du trafic en mars 2025 selon SEMrush et d'autres sources).Les données de trafic proviennent de SEMrush.Seul le trafic web a été pris en compte, excluant l'utilisation des applications mobiles.L'analyse s'est principalement concentrée sur les domaines .com (à l'exception de Yandex.ru).Malgré les limites (échantillon limité aux top 10, données web uniquement, estimation des métriques), les auteurs estiment que les données sont directionnelles et fiables pour tirer des conclusions robustes.Implications Les professionnels du SEO et les créateurs de contenu doivent adopter une approche hybride, reconnaissant l'importance continue des moteurs de recherche tout en explorant les opportunités offertes par les chatbots IA.L'intégration de l'IA est cruciale pour la survie et la croissance des plateformes de recherche traditionnelles. Celles qui tardent à s'adapter (comme Yahoo) risquent de perdre encore plus de terrain.Le marché des chatbots IA, bien que dominé par ChatGPT, est dynamique avec de nouveaux acteurs à croissance rapide comme DeepSeek et Grok.Conclusion L'étude de OneLittleWeb d'avril 2025 démontre que les chatbots IA n'ont pas encore supplanté les moteurs de recherche traditionnels en termes de volume de trafic global. Les moteurs de recherche, en s'adaptant et en intégrant des fonctionnalités d'IA, montrent une résilience et un rebond. Cependant, la croissance exponentielle des chatbots indique un changement significatif dans le comportement des utilisateurs et la manière dont l'information est consultée en ligne. L'avenir de la recherche semble résider dans une synergie accrue entre ces deux types de plateformes, chacune offrant des forces complémentaires.Soutenez le podcast :✅ Abonnez-vous à DigitalFeeling sur LinkedIn✅ Rejoignez ma newsletter : substack.com/@elodiechenol✅ Laissez 5 ⭐ sur Apple Podcasts ou Spotify

Make it Louder! Episode 552 of Make Some Music radio show with your host - Ruslan Radriges ♪ New track with Alexander Turok "Step Into The Night" ► 2rock.ffm.to/0277 ♪ Discover this episode: ► band.link/msm552 Also new music by Ruslan Radriges in playlist. Subscribe: ► soundcloud.com/ruslanradriges/sets/rrmusic Follow Ruslan Radriges: ♦Instagram ► instagram.com/ruslanradriges ♦Spotify ► spoti.fi/2pRImzg ♦Facebook ► facebook.com/RuslanRadriges ♦YouTube ► youtube.com/c/DjProduserRuslanRadriges ♦VK ► vk.com/ruslanradriges ♦Apple ► music.apple.com/ru/artist/ruslan-radriges/541431482 ♦SoundCloud: ► @ruslanradriges ♦Yandex ► music.yandex.ru/artist/3961521 #RuslanRadriges #MSM552 TRACKLIST: Ruslan Radriges - Intro 01. Jaron - Breaking Point [Forever Young Recordings] 02. Lohrasp Kansara & Adam Wilson - Dance With The Wolves [Kazukuta] 03. Sevek - Mahaba [Future House Music] 04. Februm & Great Lion - Ocean [Interplay Flow] [SOME LATELY FAVORITE] 05. Pascal Letoublon - Sacrifice [Future House Music] 06. Nihil Young & Xenia Dia - Neon Ghost [Frequenza] 07. Don Diablo - Freek Like Me [Hexagon] 08. KVSH & Future Skies - DNA [Smash The House] 09. Diego Miranda x Dixie x ILSE - Yesterday [Smash The House] 10. Sikdope & Belle Sisoski - RATS [Revealed] 11. PLS&TY & x.o.anne - Leave The Light On [Dim Mak] [MOMENT OF THE PAST] 12. CubeTonic ft. Dilara Gadel - So Strong [PERFECT TUNE] 13. Vascotia & Solange - Umbra [Serendipity Muzik] 14. Ruslan Radriges & Alexander Turok - Step Into The Night [2Rock B Side] 15. Alexander Spark & Hypersia - Sun [Interplay] 16. REFLECT - Chemicals [Forever Young Recordings] 17. Krevix x North Skies x Semblance Smile - Nothing Above [Semblance Smile] 18. 2ACES - Take Me To The Rave [Revealed] 19. Roman Messer x Lockdown x ThoBa x Daria Marx - Fever [You Love Dance] Ruslan Radriges - Outro

Make it Louder! Episode 551 of Make Some Music radio show with your host - Ruslan Radriges ♪ New track with Alexander Turok "Step Into The Night" ► 2rock.ffm.to/0277 ♪ Discover this episode: ► https://band.link/msm551 Also new music by Ruslan Radriges in playlist. Subscribe: ► https://soundcloud.com/ruslanradriges/sets/rrmusic Follow Ruslan Radriges: ♦Instagram ► https://instagram.com/ruslanradriges ♦Spotify ► https://spoti.fi/2pRImzg ♦Facebook ► https://facebook.com/RuslanRadriges ♦YouTube ► https://youtube.com/c/DjProduserRuslanRadriges ♦VK ► https://vk.com/ruslanradriges ♦Apple ► https://music.apple.com/ru/artist/ruslan-radriges/541431482 ♦SoundCloud: ► https://soundcloud.com/ruslanradriges ♦Yandex ► https://music.yandex.ru/artist/3961521 #RuslanRadriges #MSM551 TRACKLIST: Ruslan Radriges - Intro 01. CamelPhat & Vomee - Needed You [When Stars Align] 02. DaWTone & Alex Soun - Bass & Drops [2Rock Electronic] 03. Rebuke & P.T. Adamczyk ft. Aya Anne - Forever [Era] 04. Massano ft. Kali Claire - Over The Edge [Simulate] [PERFECT TUNE] 05. Pascal Letoublon - Sacrifice [Future House Music] 06. Sergei Rez - Guapa [Arryba] 07. Raz Nitzan & Theia - The Eye of The Storm [RNM] 08. LUMOS - Home [A Tribute To Life] 09. Eximinds - Levitation [Interplay] 10. Johan Vilborg - Resonate [Enhanced Progressive] 11. Markus Martinez & Verahesa - Ruin My Night [On The Way] 12. NERVO x Plastik Funk ft. Julia Temos - Talk About Us (Panuma Remix) [Future House Music] [SOME LATELY FAVORITE] 13. Ruslan Radriges & Alexander Turok - Step Into The Night [2Rock B Side] 14. FEEL & Alexander Komarov - Mantra [Suanda] 15. Thomas Gold ft. Offdata - Dynamite [Revealed] [MOMENT OF THE PAST] 16. Ruslan Radriges & WhiteLight - Move 17. Gelida - Leave The Rest Behind [Revealed] 18. Kevin Krissen & Robert Junior - Now & Forever [Revealed] 19. Vexa9 - Algorithmic Devastation [Nedostupnostь] Ruslan Radriges - Outro

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Today we travel back to Russia to meet a time traveler, and then we take a boat cruise to become part of a missing person's investigation! Original Air Date: Sep 18, 2019   Patreon (Get ad-free episodes, Patreon Discord Access, and more!) https://www.patreon.com/user?u=18482113 PayPal Donation Link https://tinyurl.com/mrxe36ph MERCH STORE!!! https://tinyurl.com/y8zam4o2 Amazon Wish List https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/28CIOGSFRUXAD?ref_=wl_share Help Promote Dead Rabbit! Dual Flyer https://i.imgur.com/OhuoI2v.jpg "As Above" Flyer https://i.imgur.com/yobMtUp.jpg “Alien Flyer” By TVP VT U https://imgur.com/gallery/aPN1Fnw “QR Code Flyer” by Finn https://imgur.com/a/aYYUMAh Links: THE MAN FROM THE FUTURE – GAIDUCHOK YEVGENY IOSIFOVICH https://anomalien.com/the-man-from-the-future-gaiduchok-yevgeny-iosifovich/ Translate.Yandex https://translate.yandex.ru/ A resident of Zhirnovsk Eugene Gayduchok was a time traveler from the Future? https://www.fern-flower.org/en/news/resident-zhirnovsk-eugene-gayduchok-was-time-traveler-future Vadim Chernobrov https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadim_Chernobrov Gates to the future become reality this spring http://www.pravdareport.com/society/104194-gates_future/ Time Can be Turned Back https://web.archive.org/web/20100123024501/http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12190_experiment.html Cruise Into The Unknown – The Disappearance Of Amy Lynn Bradley https://morbidology.com/cruise-into-the-unknown-the-disappearance-of-amy-lynn-bradley/   ------------------------------------------------ Logo Art By Ash Black Opening Song: "Atlantis Attacks" Closing Song: "Bella Royale" Music By Simple Rabbitron 3000 created by Eerbud Thanks to Chris K, Founder Of The Golden Rabbit Brigade Dead Rabbit Archivist Some Weirdo On Twitter AKA Jack YouTube Champ: Stewart Meatball Reddit Champ: TheLast747 The Haunted Mic Arm provided by Chyme Chili Discord Mods: Mason Forever Fluffle: Cantillions, Samson, Gregory Gilbertson, Jenny the Cat http://www.DeadRabbit.com Email: DeadRabbitRadio@gmail.com Facebook: www.Facebook.com/DeadRabbitRadio TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@deadrabbitradio Dead Rabbit Radio Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/DeadRabbitRadio/ Paranormal News Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/ParanormalNews/ Mailing Address Jason Carpenter PO Box 1363 Hood River, OR 97031 Paranormal, Conspiracy, and True Crime news as it happens! Jason Carpenter breaks the stories they'll be talking about tomorrow, assuming the world doesn't end today. All Contents Of This Podcast Copyright Jason Carpenter 2018 - 2025  

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Это лекция №40 из курса Гражданского права (общей части). Тема лекции: Понятие способа обеспечения исполнения обязательства. Неустойка. Подкаст передачи доступен в: iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/ru/podcast/antonivanov-ru/.. Yandex https://music.yandex.ru/album/11010340?dir=desc&a.. Персональный сайт: http://antonivanov.ru Блог: https://zakon.ru/ivanov.pravo VK: https://vk.com/ivanov.pravo Livejournal: https://ivanov-pravo.livejournal.com

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

About Oleg EgorovOleg Egorov is the Chief Marketing Officer at Flowwow, a global gifting marketplace revolutionizing how customers connect with local shops. With nearly 20 years of experience in digital marketing, Oleg has played a crucial role in Flowwow's transformation from a flower aggregator to a thriving gifting platform. Having previously worked at Yandex, a leading tech company in the CIS region, he brings a wealth of expertise in scaling businesses, leveraging data-driven strategies, and driving growth. At Flowwow, he leads a team of almost 100 marketing specialists, ensuring the platform continues to support local entrepreneurs and deliver an exceptional customer experience.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Don't forget to apply for that World Wide Underground internship today because this week we're discussing season 3, episode 25 of Lucha Underground entitled "Left for Dead". Come along as we chat about the episode, plus Ruby-Spears Productions, Hit Clips, Yandex, "Holey Moley", heavy scenes, P.O.W.s, Cardcaptor Sakura, brass knuckles, Pit Fighter, Emo Phillips, interns, best of fives, memory foam, cat jumps, Sailor Moon spoilers, & more!Want to hear more from your favorite Marsh Land Media hosts? Hear exclusive shows, podcasts, and content by heading toPatreon.com/MLMpod!Buy some Shuffling the Deck / MLMpod MERCH, including our "Natty With Otters" shirt, over at redbubble.com/shop/msspod!Follow James @MarshLandMedia on Twitter, @MLMpod on Instagram, and listen to his music under "Marsh Land Monster" wherever music is found! Follow Sean on Twitter @SeanMarciniak and on Twitch @GooseVK! Join ourDiscord!Have fan mail, fan art, projects you want us to review, or whatever you want to send us? You can ship directly to us using "James McCollum, PO Box 180036, 2011 W Montrose Ave, Chicago, IL 60618"! Send us a voice mail to be played on the show at (224) 900-7644!Find out more about James' other podcasts "Mostly Speakin' Sentai", "Hit It & Crit It", and "This Movie's Gay" on our website,www.MLMPod.com!!! Plus, download all Marsh Land Monster albums there, too!

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Marketing im Kopf - ein Podcast von Luis Binder In dieser Folge wird über verschiedene Unternehmen gesprochen, da Markennamen genannt werden, handelt es sich um UNBEZAHLTE WERBUNG! In dieser Folge: In der heutigen Podcastfolge von Marketing im Kopf geht es noch mal um Fernsehwerbung. Es wird zum einen darum gehen, was das Ganze kostet, aber auch wieder was für Vor- und Nachteile dieses Medium hat und dann werden wir uns auch noch kurz das Thema Print anschauen.   ____________________________________________ Marketing-News der Woche: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Googles Marktanteil fällt unter 90 %⁠ Google bleibt die beliebteste Suchmaschine der Welt, aber der Marktanteil ist im Schlussquartal 2024 erstmals seit 2015 unter 90 % gefallen. Microsofts Bing folgt mit etwa vier Prozent Marktanteil. Yandex und Yahoo liegen auf den Plätzen drei und vier. Google hat vor allem in Asien Marktanteile verloren, wo die russische Suchmaschine Yandex im Schlussquartal 2024 stärker war. Also erstmal keine wirklichen Auswirkungen für Deutschland. ⁠ Schon mal von Granfluencern gehört?⁠ Granfluencer sind ältere Menschen, die als Influencer für hippe Klamotten und Designermode auftreten. Beispiele sind Alojz Abram alias "Gramps" und das Paar Aki und Koichi Kim, die auf Instagram und TikTok große Reichweiten erzielen. Diese älteren Influencer zeigen, dass Mode kein Alter kennt und dass Kontraste zwischen Alter und jugendlicher Kleidung gut ankommen. Marken wie Dior, New Balance und H&M nutzen diesen Trend, um ihre Produkte zu bewerben.⁠ Pflicht zur Barrierefreiheit⁠ Das Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG) tritt am 28. Juni 2025 in Kraft und verpflichtet Unternehmen, ihre digitalen Angebote barrierefrei zu gestalten. Das betrifft ungefähr 190.000 Firmen in Deutschland und umfasst Produkte und Dienstleistungen wie Computer, Smartphones, E-Books, Telekommunikation und E-Commerce. Barrierefreiheit verbessert die User Experience für alle und stärkt die Kundenbindung. ABER viele Websites, insbesondere im Online-Handel, haben noch Nachholbedarf. ⁠ Die Auswirkung von KI-Suchmaschienen⁠ KI-getriebene Suchmaschinen wie SearchGPT von OpenAI bieten eine neue Art der Informationssuche, indem sie Fließtexte anstelle von Links zu Drittseiten liefern. Marken können davon aber profitieren, indem sie sinnvollen Content bereitstellen, der in den Suchergebnissen zitiert wird. So zum Beispiel die nachhaltige Menstruationsproduktmarke Viv. Die verzeichnete einen Traffic-Anstieg von 400 Prozent, nachdem ihre Produkte in einem Blogbeitrag erwähnt wurden, der von einer KI-Suche zitiert wurde. Und am Ende interagieren Nutzer von KI-Suchmaschinen nicht nur mit den bereitgestellten Zusammenfassungen, sondern klicken auch auf die Links oder kaufen Produkte. ____________________________________________ Über den Podcast: In dem Podcast Marketing im Kopf soll es um die Frage gehen, was notwendig ist, um ein Produkt oder eine Dienstleistung gut vermarkten zu können und was für grundsätzliche Strategien verfolgt und ganz leicht umgesetzt werden können. Egal, ob du selbst im Bereich Marketing arbeitest, oder, ob du dich einfach nur für das Thema interessierst, in diesem Marketing-Podcast lernst du alle Grundlagen und Strategien, die aktuell im Marketing verwendet werden. ____________________________________________ Vernetz dich gerne auf LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/luisbinder/⁠  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marketingimkopf/ Du hast Fragen, Anregungen oder Ideen? Melde dich unter: marketingimkopf@gmail.com  Die Website zum Podcast findest du hier. [⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/2WN7tH5⁠⁠⁠]

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Nebius AI Aktie: So direkt in AI GPU in Eurpa investieren - Nvidia Investment - Die neue Yandex!

Google y todos los buscadores ( Bing , Perplexity (IA) , Yahoo , Baidu , Yandex , DuckDuckGo , Brave , Ecosia , AOL , etc.) consideran a ARCANOS.COM como "La Mejor Lectura de Tarot a nivel mundial" desde 2011, ¡13 años de liderazgo!. Búscalo y compruébalo. ¿Y por qué ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot?: 1) ARCANOS.COM NO ES UN GABINETE. Te atiendo yo mismo, STUART de ARCANOS.COM , nadie más. 2) Te digo la verdad SIEMPRE, para que tomes las mejores decisiones. 3) Mis respuestas siempre son PRECISAS. Por ejemplo: Si eres emprendedor, te puedo decir a qué precio vender tus productos o a qué trabajadores contratar. Si eres inversionista, te digo en qué valores debes invertir. Si eres trabajador, cuánto pedir de aumento salarial, o si encontrarás otro. Y en lo sentimental, qué siente realmente tu pareja o si encontrarás un nuevo amor, etc., etc., etc. PREGUNTA LO QUE QUIERAS. Por todo eso y más, ARCANOS.COM es La Mejor Lectura de Tarot.

Applications close Monday for the NYC AI Engineer Summit focusing on AI Leadership and Agent Engineering! If you applied, invites should be rolling out shortly.The search landscape is experiencing a fundamental shift. Google built a >$2T company with the “10 blue links” experience, driven by PageRank as the core innovation for ranking. This was a big improvement from the previous directory-based experiences of AltaVista and Yahoo. Almost 4 decades later, Google is now stuck in this links-based experience, especially from a business model perspective. This legacy architecture creates fundamental constraints:* Must return results in ~400 milliseconds* Required to maintain comprehensive web coverage* Tied to keyword-based matching algorithms* Cost structures optimized for traditional indexingAs we move from the era of links to the era of answers, the way search works is changing. You're not showing a user links, but the goal is to provide context to an LLM. This means moving from keyword based search to more semantic understanding of the content:The link prediction objective can be seen as like a neural PageRank because what you're doing is you're predicting the links people share... but it's more powerful than PageRank. It's strictly more powerful because people might refer to that Paul Graham fundraising essay in like a thousand different ways. And so our model learns all the different ways.All of this is now powered by a $5M cluster with 144 H200s:This architectural choice enables entirely new search capabilities:* Comprehensive result sets instead of approximations* Deep semantic understanding of queries* Ability to process complex, natural language requestsAs search becomes more complex, time to results becomes a variable:People think of searches as like, oh, it takes 500 milliseconds because we've been conditioned... But what if searches can take like a minute or 10 minutes or a whole day, what can you then do?Unlike traditional search engines' fixed-cost indexing, Exa employs a hybrid approach:* Front-loaded compute for indexing and embeddings* Variable inference costs based on query complexity* Mix of owned infrastructure ($5M H200 cluster) and cloud resourcesExa sees a lot of competition from products like Perplexity and ChatGPT Search which layer AI on top of traditional search backends, but Exa is betting that true innovation requires rethinking search from the ground up. For example, the recently launched Websets, a way to turn searches into structured output in grid format, allowing you to create lists and databases out of web pages. The company raised a $17M Series A to build towards this mission, so keep an eye out for them in 2025. Chapters* 00:00:00 Introductions* 00:01:12 ExaAI's initial pitch and concept* 00:02:33 Will's background at SpaceX and Zoox* 00:03:45 Evolution of ExaAI (formerly Metaphor Systems)* 00:05:38 Exa's link prediction technology* 00:09:20 Meaning of the name "Exa"* 00:10:36 ExaAI's new product launch and capabilities* 00:13:33 Compute budgets and variable compute products* 00:14:43 Websets as a B2B offering* 00:19:28 How do you build a search engine?* 00:22:43 What is Neural PageRank?* 00:27:58 Exa use cases * 00:35:00 Auto-prompting* 00:38:42 Building agentic search* 00:44:19 Is o1 on the path to AGI?* 00:49:59 Company culture and nap pods* 00:54:52 Economics of AI search and the future of search technologyFull YouTube TranscriptPlease like and subscribe!Show Notes* ExaAI* Web Search Product* Websets* Series A Announcement* Exa Nap Pods* Perplexity AI* Character.AITranscriptAlessio [00:00:00]: Hey, everyone. Welcome to the Latent Space podcast. This is Alessio, partner and CTO at Decibel Partners, and I'm joined by my co-host Swyx, founder of Smol.ai.Swyx [00:00:10]: Hey, and today we're in the studio with my good friend and former landlord, Will Bryk. Roommate. How you doing? Will, you're now CEO co-founder of ExaAI, used to be Metaphor Systems. What's your background, your story?Will [00:00:30]: Yeah, sure. So, yeah, I'm CEO of Exa. I've been doing it for three years. I guess I've always been interested in search, whether I knew it or not. Like, since I was a kid, I've always been interested in, like, high-quality information. And, like, you know, even in high school, wanted to improve the way we get information from news. And then in college, built a mini search engine. And then with Exa, like, you know, it's kind of like fulfilling the dream of actually being able to solve all the information needs I wanted as a kid. Yeah, I guess. I would say my entire life has kind of been rotating around this problem, which is pretty cool. Yeah.Swyx [00:00:50]: What'd you enter YC with?Will [00:00:53]: We entered YC with, uh, we are better than Google. Like, Google 2.0.Swyx [00:01:12]: What makes you say that? Like, that's so audacious to come out of the box with.Will [00:01:16]: Yeah, okay, so you have to remember the time. This was summer 2021. And, uh, GPT-3 had come out. Like, here was this magical thing that you could talk to, you could enter a whole paragraph, and it understands what you mean, understands the subtlety of your language. And then there was Google. Uh, which felt like it hadn't changed in a decade, uh, because it really hadn't. And it, like, you would give it a simple query, like, I don't know, uh, shirts without stripes, and it would give you a bunch of results for the shirts with stripes. And so, like, Google could barely understand you, and GBD3 could. And the theory was, what if you could make a search engine that actually understood you? What if you could apply the insights from LLMs to a search engine? And it's really been the same idea ever since. And we're actually a lot closer now, uh, to doing that. Yeah.Alessio [00:01:55]: Did you have any trouble making people believe? Obviously, there's the same element. I mean, YC overlap, was YC pretty AI forward, even 2021, or?Will [00:02:03]: It's nothing like it is today. But, um, uh, there were a few AI companies, but, uh, we were definitely, like, bold. And I think people, VCs generally like boldness, and we definitely had some AI background, and we had a working demo. So there was evidence that we could build something that was going to work. But yeah, I think, like, the fundamentals were there. I think people at the time were talking about how, you know, Google was failing in a lot of ways. And so there was a bit of conversation about it, but AI was not a big, big thing at the time. Yeah. Yeah.Alessio [00:02:33]: Before we jump into Exa, any fun background stories? I know you interned at SpaceX, any Elon, uh, stories? I know you were at Zoox as well, you know, kind of like robotics at Harvard. Any stuff that you saw early that you thought was going to get solved that maybe it's not solved today?Will [00:02:48]: Oh yeah. I mean, lots of things like that. Like, uh, I never really learned how to drive because I believed Elon that self-driving cars would happen. It did happen. And I take them every night to get home. But it took like 10 more years than I thought. Do you still not know how to drive? I know how to drive now. I learned it like two years ago. That would have been great to like, just, you know, Yeah, yeah, yeah. You know? Um, I was obsessed with Elon. Yeah. I mean, I worked at SpaceX because I really just wanted to work at one of his companies. And I remember they had a rule, like interns cannot touch Elon. And, um, that rule actually influenced my actions.Swyx [00:03:18]: Is it, can Elon touch interns? Ooh, like physically?Will [00:03:22]: Or like talk? Physically, physically, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, interesting. He's changed a lot, but, um, I mean, his companies are amazing. Um,Swyx [00:03:28]: What if you beat him at Diablo 2, Diablo 4, you know, like, Ah, maybe.Alessio [00:03:34]: I want to jump into, I know there's a lot of backstory used to be called metaphor system. So, um, and it, you've always been kind of like a prominent company, maybe at least RAI circles in the NSF.Swyx [00:03:45]: I'm actually curious how Metaphor got its initial aura. You launched with like, very little. We launched very little. Like there was, there was this like big splash image of like, this is Aurora or something. Yeah. Right. And then I was like, okay, what this thing, like the vibes are good, but I don't know what it is. And I think, I think it was much more sort of maybe consumer facing than what you are today. Would you say that's true?Will [00:04:06]: No, it's always been about building a better search algorithm, like search, like, just like the vision has always been perfect search. And if you do that, uh, we will figure out the downstream use cases later. It started on this fundamental belief that you could have perfect search over the web and we could talk about what that means. And like the initial thing we released was really just like our first search engine, like trying to get it out there. Kind of like, you know, an open source. So when OpenAI released, uh, ChachBt, like they didn't, I don't know how, how much of a game plan they had. They kind of just wanted to get something out there.Swyx [00:04:33]: Spooky research preview.Will [00:04:34]: Yeah, exactly. And it kind of morphed from a research company to a product company at that point. And I think similarly for us, like we were research, we started as a research endeavor with a, you know, clear eyes that like, if we succeed, it will be a massive business to make out of it. And that's kind of basically what happened. I think there are actually a lot of parallels to, of w between Exa and OpenAI. I often say we're the OpenAI of search. Um, because. Because we're a research company, we're a research startup that does like fundamental research into, uh, making like AGI for search in a, in a way. Uh, and then we have all these like, uh, business products that come out of that.Swyx [00:05:08]: Interesting. I want to ask a little bit more about Metaforesight and then we can go full Exa. When I first met you, which was really funny, cause like literally I stayed in your house in a very historic, uh, Hayes, Hayes Valley place. You said you were building sort of like link prediction foundation model, and I think there's still a lot of foundation model work. I mean, within Exa today, but what does that even mean? I cannot be the only person confused by that because like there's a limited vocabulary or tokens you're telling me, like the tokens are the links or, you know, like it's not, it's not clear. Yeah.Will [00:05:38]: Uh, what we meant by link prediction is that you are literally predicting, like given some texts, you're predicting the links that follow. Yes. That refers to like, it's how we describe the training procedure, which is that we find links on the web. Uh, we take the text surrounding the link. And then we predict. Which link follows you, like, uh, you know, similar to transformers where, uh, you're trying to predict the next token here, you're trying to predict the next link. And so you kind of like hide the link from the transformer. So if someone writes, you know, imagine some article where someone says, Hey, check out this really cool aerospace startup. And they, they say spacex.com afterwards, uh, we hide the spacex.com and ask the model, like what link came next. And by doing that many, many times, you know, billions of times, you could actually build a search engine out of that because then, uh, at query time at search time. Uh, you type in, uh, a query that's like really cool aerospace startup and the model will then try to predict what are the most likely links. So there's a lot of analogs to transformers, but like to actually make this work, it does require like a different architecture than, but it's transformer inspired. Yeah.Alessio [00:06:41]: What's the design decision between doing that versus extracting the link and the description and then embedding the description and then using, um, yeah. What do you need to predict the URL versus like just describing, because you're kind of do a similar thing in a way. Right. It's kind of like based on this description, it was like the closest link for it. So one thing is like predicting the link. The other approach is like I extract the link and the description, and then based on the query, I searched the closest description to it more. Yeah.Will [00:07:09]: That, that, by the way, that is, that is the link refers here to a document. It's not, I think one confusing thing is it's not, you're not actually predicting the URL, the URL itself that would require like the, the system to have memorized URLs. You're actually like getting the actual document, a more accurate name could be document prediction. I see. This was the initial like base model that Exo was trained on, but we've moved beyond that similar to like how, you know, uh, to train a really good like language model, you might start with this like self-supervised objective of predicting the next token and then, uh, just from random stuff on the web. But then you, you want to, uh, add a bunch of like synthetic data and like supervised fine tuning, um, stuff like that to make it really like controllable and robust. Yeah.Alessio [00:07:48]: Yeah. We just have flow from Lindy and, uh, their Lindy started to like hallucinate recrolling YouTube links instead of like, uh, something. Yeah. Support guide. So. Oh, interesting. Yeah.Swyx [00:07:57]: So round about January, you announced your series A and renamed to Exo. I didn't like the name at the, at the initial, but it's grown on me. I liked metaphor, but apparently people can spell metaphor. What would you say are the major components of Exo today? Right? Like, I feel like it used to be very model heavy. Then at the AI engineer conference, Shreyas gave a really good talk on the vector database that you guys have. What are the other major moving parts of Exo? Okay.Will [00:08:23]: So Exo overall is a search engine. Yeah. We're trying to make it like a perfect search engine. And to do that, you have to build lots of, and we're doing it from scratch, right? So to do that, you have to build lots of different. The crawler. Yeah. You have to crawl a bunch of the web. First of all, you have to find the URLs to crawl. Uh, it's connected to the crawler, but yeah, you find URLs, you crawl those URLs. Then you have to process them with some, you know, it could be an embedding model. It could be something more complex, but you need to take, you know, or like, you know, in the past it was like a keyword inverted index. Like you would process all these documents you gather into some processed index, and then you have to serve that. Uh, you had high throughput at low latency. And so that, and that's like the vector database. And so it's like the crawling system, the AI processing system, and then the serving system. Those are all like, you know, teams of like hundreds, maybe thousands of people at Google. Um, but for us, it's like one or two people each typically, but yeah.Alessio [00:09:13]: Can you explain the meaning of, uh, Exo, just the story 10 to the 16th, uh, 18, 18.Will [00:09:20]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure. So. Exo means 10 to the 18th, which is in stark contrast to. To Google, which is 10 to the hundredth. Uh, we actually have these like awesome shirts that are like 10th to 18th is greater than 10th to the hundredth. Yeah, it's great. And it's great because it's provocative. It's like every engineer in Silicon Valley is like, what? No, it's not true. Um, like, yeah. And, uh, and then you, you ask them, okay, what does it actually mean? And like the creative ones will, will recognize it. But yeah, I mean, 10 to the 18th is better than 10 to the hundredth when it comes to search, because with search, you want like the actual list of, of things that match what you're asking for. You don't want like the whole web. You want to basically with search filter, the, like everything that humanity has ever created to exactly what you want. And so the idea is like smaller is better there. You want like the best 10th to the 18th and not the 10th to the hundredth. I'm like, one way to say this is like, you know how Google often says at the top, uh, like, you know, 30 million results found. And it's like crazy. Cause you're looking for like the first startups in San Francisco that work on hardware or something. And like, they're not 30 million results like that. What you want is like 325 results found. And those are all the results. That's what you really want with search. And that's, that's our vision. It's like, it just gives you. Perfectly what you asked for.Swyx [00:10:24]: We're recording this ahead of your launch. Uh, we haven't released, we haven't figured out the, the, the name of the launch yet, but what is the product that you're launching? I guess now that we're coinciding this podcast with. Yeah.Will [00:10:36]: So we've basically developed the next version of Exa, which is the ability to get a near perfect list of results of whatever you want. And what that means is you can make a complex query now to Exa, for example, startups working on hardware in SF, and then just get a huge list of all the things that match. And, you know, our goal is if there are 325 startups that match that we find you all of them. And this is just like, there's just like a new experience that's never existed before. It's really like, I don't know how you would go about that right now with current tools and you can apply this same type of like technology to anything. Like, let's say you want, uh, you want to find all the blog posts that talk about Alessio's podcast, um, that have come out in the past year. That is 30 million results. Yeah. Right.Will [00:11:24]: But that, I mean, that would, I'm sure that would be extremely useful to you guys. And like, I don't really know how you would get that full comprehensive list.Swyx [00:11:29]: I just like, how do you, well, there's so many questions with regards to how do you know it's complete, right? Cause you're saying there's only 30 million, 325, whatever. And then how do you do the semantic understanding that it might take, right? So working in hardware, like I might not use the words hardware. I might use the words robotics. I might use the words wearables. I might use like whatever. Yes. So yeah, just tell us more. Yeah. Yeah. Sure. Sure.Will [00:11:53]: So one aspect of this, it's a little subjective. So like certainly providing, you know, at some point we'll provide parameters to the user to like, you know, some sort of threshold to like, uh, gauge like, okay, like this is a cutoff. Like, this is actually not what I mean, because sometimes it's subjective and there needs to be a feedback loop. Like, oh, like it might give you like a few examples and you say, yeah, exactly. And so like, you're, you're kind of like creating a classifier on the fly, but like, that's ultimately how you solve the problem. So the subject, there's a subjectivity problem and then there's a comprehensiveness problem. Those are two different problems. So. Yeah. So you have the comprehensiveness problem. What you basically have to do is you have to put more compute into the query, into the search until you get the full comprehensiveness. Yeah. And I think there's an interesting point here, which is that not all queries are made equal. Some queries just like this blog post one might require scanning, like scavenging, like throughout the whole web in a way that just, just simply requires more compute. You know, at some point there's some amount of compute where you will just be comprehensive. You could imagine, for example, running GPT-4 over the internet. You could imagine running GPT-4 over the entire web and saying like, is this a blog post about Alessio's podcast, like, is this a blog post about Alessio's podcast? And then that would work, right? It would take, you know, a year, maybe cost like a million dollars, but, or many more, but, um, it would work. Uh, the point is that like, given sufficient compute, you can solve the query. And so it's really a question of like, how comprehensive do you want it given your compute budget? I think it's very similar to O1, by the way. And one way of thinking about what we built is like O1 for search, uh, because O1 is all about like, you know, some, some, some questions require more compute than others, and we'll put as much compute into the question as we need to solve it. So similarly with our search, we will put as much compute into the query in order to get comprehensiveness. Yeah.Swyx [00:13:33]: Does that mean you have like some kind of compute budget that I can specify? Yes. Yes. Okay. And like, what are the upper and lower bounds?Will [00:13:42]: Yeah, there's something we're still figuring out. I think like, like everyone is a new paradigm of like variable compute products. Yeah. How do you specify the amount of compute? Like what happens when you. Run out? Do you just like, ah, do you, can you like keep going with it? Like, do you just put in more credits to get more, um, for some, like this can get complex at like the really large compute queries. And like, one thing we do is we give you a preview of what you're going to get, and then you could then spin up like a much larger job, uh, to get like way more results. But yes, there is some compute limit, um, at, at least right now. Yeah. People think of searches as like, oh, it takes 500 milliseconds because we've been conditioned, uh, to have search that takes 500 milliseconds. But like search engines like Google, right. No matter how complex your query to Google, it will take like, you know, roughly 400 milliseconds. But what if searches can take like a minute or 10 minutes or a whole day, what can you then do? And you can do very powerful things. Um, you know, you can imagine, you know, writing a search, going and get a cup of coffee, coming back and you have a perfect list. Like that's okay for a lot of use cases. Yeah.Alessio [00:14:43]: Yeah. I mean, the use case closest to me is venture capital, right? So, uh, no, I mean, eight years ago, I built one of the first like data driven sourcing platforms. So we were. You look at GitHub, Twitter, Product Hunt, all these things, look at interesting things, evaluate them. If you think about some jobs that people have, it's like literally just make a list. If you're like an analyst at a venture firm, your job is to make a list of interesting companies. And then you reach out to them. How do you think about being infrastructure versus like a product you could say, Hey, this is like a product to find companies. This is a product to find things versus like offering more as a blank canvas that people can build on top of. Oh, right. Right.Will [00:15:20]: Uh, we are. We are a search infrastructure company. So we want people to build, uh, on top of us, uh, build amazing products on top of us. But with this one, we try to build something that makes it really easy for users to just log in, put a few, you know, put some credits in and just get like amazing results right away and not have to wait to build some API integration. So we're kind of doing both. Uh, we, we want, we want people to integrate this into all their applications at the same time. We want to just make it really easy to use very similar again to open AI. Like they'll have, they have an API, but they also have. Like a ChatGPT interface so that you could, it's really easy to use, but you could also build it in your applications. Yeah.Alessio [00:15:56]: I'm still trying to wrap my head around a lot of the implications. So, so many businesses run on like information arbitrage, you know, like I know this thing that you don't, especially in investment and financial services. So yeah, now all of a sudden you have these tools for like, oh, actually everybody can get the same information at the same time, the same quality level as an API call. You know, it just kind of changes a lot of things. Yeah.Will [00:16:19]: I think, I think what we're grappling with here. What, what you're just thinking about is like, what is the world like if knowledge is kind of solved, if like any knowledge request you want is just like right there on your computer, it's kind of different from when intelligence is solved. There's like a good, I've written before about like a different super intelligence, super knowledge. Yeah. Like I think that the, the distinction between intelligence and knowledge is actually a pretty good one. They're definitely connected and related in all sorts of ways, but there is a distinction. You could have a world and we are going to have this world where you have like GP five level systems and beyond that could like answer any complex request. Um, unless it requires some. Like, if you say like, uh, you know, give me a list of all the PhDs in New York city who, I don't know, have thought about search before. And even though this, this super intelligence is going to be like, I can't find it on Google, right. Which is kind of crazy. Like we're literally going to have like super intelligences that are using Google. And so if Google can't find them information, there's nothing they could do. They can't find it. So, but if you also have a super knowledge system where it's like, you know, I'm calling this term super knowledge where you just get whatever knowledge you want, then you can pair with a super intelligence system. And then the super intelligence can, we'll never. Be blocked by lack of knowledge.Alessio [00:17:23]: Yeah. You told me this, uh, when we had lunch, I forget how it came out, but we were talking about AGI and whatnot. And you were like, even AGI is going to need search. Yeah.Swyx [00:17:32]: Yeah. Right. Yeah. Um, so we're actually referencing a blog post that you wrote super intelligence and super knowledge. Uh, so I would refer people to that. And this is actually a discussion we've had on the podcast a couple of times. Um, there's so much of model weights that are just memorizing facts. Some of the, some of those might be outdated. Some of them are incomplete or not. Yeah. So like you just need search. So I do wonder, like, is there a maximum language model size that will be the intelligence layer and then the rest is just search, right? Like maybe we should just always use search. And then that sort of workhorse model is just like, and it like, like, like one B or three B parameter model that just drives everything. Yes.Will [00:18:13]: I believe this is a much more optimal system to have a smaller LM. That's really just like an intelligence module. And it makes a call to a search. Tool that's way more efficient because if, okay, I mean the, the opposite of that would be like the LM is so big that can memorize the whole web. That would be like way, but you know, it's not practical at all. I don't, it's not possible to train that at least right now. And Carpathy has actually written about this, how like he could, he could see models moving more and more towards like intelligence modules using various tools. Yeah.Swyx [00:18:39]: So for listeners, that's the, that was him on the no priors podcast. And for us, we talked about this and the, on the Shin Yu and Harrison chase podcasts. I'm doing search in my head. I told you 30 million results. I forgot about our neural link integration. Self-hosted exit.Will [00:18:54]: Yeah. Yeah. No, I do see that that is a much more, much more efficient world. Yeah. I mean, you could also have GB four level systems calling search, but it's just because of the cost of inference. It's just better to have a very efficient search tool and a very efficient LM and they're built for different things. Yeah.Swyx [00:19:09]: I'm just kind of curious. Like it is still something so audacious that I don't want to elide, which is you're, you're, you're building a search engine. Where do you start? How do you, like, are there any reference papers or implementation? That would really influence your thinking, anything like that? Because I don't even know where to start apart from just crawl a bunch of s**t, but there's gotta be more insight than that.Will [00:19:28]: I mean, yeah, there's more insight, but I'm always surprised by like, if you have a group of people who are really focused on solving a problem, um, with the tools today, like there's some in, in software, like there are all sorts of creative solutions that just haven't been thought of before, particularly in the information retrieval field. Yeah. I think a lot of the techniques are just very old, frankly. Like I know how Google and Bing work and. They're just not using new methods. There are all sorts of reasons for that. Like one, like Google has to be comprehensive over the web. So they're, and they have to return in 400 milliseconds. And those two things combined means they are kind of limit and it can't cost too much. They're kind of limited in, uh, what kinds of algorithms they could even deploy at scale. So they end up using like a limited keyword based algorithm. Also like Google was built in a time where like in, you know, in 1998, where we didn't have LMS, we didn't have embeddings. And so they never thought to build those things. And so now they have this like gigantic system that is built on old technology. Yeah. And so a lot of the information retrieval field we found just like thinks in terms of that framework. Yeah. Whereas we came in as like newcomers just thinking like, okay, there here's GB three. It's magical. Obviously we're going to build search that is using that technology. And we never even thought about using keywords really ever. Uh, like we were neural all the way we're building an end to end neural search engine. And just that whole framing just makes us ask different questions, like pursue different lines of work. And there's just a lot of low hanging fruit because no one else is thinking about it. We're just on the frontier of neural search. We just are, um, for, for at web scale, um, because there's just not a lot of people thinking that way about it.Swyx [00:20:57]: Yeah. Maybe let's spell this out since, uh, we're already on this topic, elephants in the room are Perplexity and SearchGPT. That's the, I think that it's all, it's no longer called SearchGPT. I think they call it ChatGPT Search. How would you contrast your approaches to them based on what we know of how they work and yeah, just any, anything in that, in that area? Yeah.Will [00:21:15]: So these systems, there are a few of them now, uh, they basically rely on like traditional search engines like Google or Bing, and then they combine them with like LLMs at the end to, you know, output some power graphics, uh, answering your question. So they like search GPT perplexity. I think they have their own crawlers. No. So there's this important distinction between like having your own search system and like having your own cache of the web. Like for example, so you could create, you could crawl a bunch of the web. Imagine you crawl a hundred billion URLs, and then you create a key value store of like mapping from URL to the document that is technically called an index, but it's not a search algorithm. So then to actually like, when you make a query to search GPT, for example, what is it actually doing it? Let's say it's, it's, it could, it's using the Bing API, uh, getting a list of results and then it could go, it has this cache of like all the contents of those results and then could like bring in the cache, like the index cache, but it's not actually like, it's not like they've built a search engine from scratch over, you know, hundreds of billions of pages. It's like, does that distinction clear? It's like, yeah, you could have like a mapping from URL to documents, but then rely on traditional search engines to actually get the list of results because it's a very hard problem to take. It's not hard. It's not hard to use DynamoDB and, and, and map URLs to documents. It's a very hard problem to take a hundred billion or more documents and given a query, like instantly get the list of results that match. That's a much harder problem that very few entities on, in, on the planet have done. Like there's Google, there's Bing, uh, you know, there's Yandex, but you know, there are not that many companies that are, that are crazy enough to actually build their search engine from scratch when you could just use traditional search APIs.Alessio [00:22:43]: So Google had PageRank as like the big thing. Is there a LLM equivalent or like any. Stuff that you're working on that you want to highlight?Will [00:22:51]: The link prediction objective can be seen as like a neural PageRank because what you're doing is you're predicting the links people share. And so if everyone is sharing some Paul Graham essay about fundraising, then like our model is more likely to predict it. So like inherent in our training objective is this, uh, a sense of like high canonicity and like high quality, but it's more powerful than PageRank. It's strictly more powerful because people might refer to that Paul Graham fundraising essay in like a thousand different ways. And so our model learns all the different ways. That someone refers that Paul Graham, I say, while also learning how important that Paul Graham essay is. Um, so it's like, it's like PageRank on steroids kind of thing. Yeah.Alessio [00:23:26]: I think to me, that's the most interesting thing about search today, like with Google and whatnot, it's like, it's mostly like domain authority. So like if you get back playing, like if you search any AI term, you get this like SEO slop websites with like a bunch of things in them. So this is interesting, but then how do you think about more timeless maybe content? So if you think about, yeah. You know, maybe the founder mode essay, right. It gets shared by like a lot of people, but then you might have a lot of other essays that are also good, but they just don't really get a lot of traction. Even though maybe the people that share them are high quality. How do you kind of solve that thing when you don't have the people authority, so to speak of who's sharing, whether or not they're worth kind of like bumping up? Yeah.Will [00:24:10]: I mean, you do have a lot of control over the training data, so you could like make sure that the training data contains like high quality sources so that, okay. Like if you, if you're. Training data, I mean, it's very similar to like language, language model training. Like if you train on like a bunch of crap, your prediction will be crap. Our model will match the training distribution is trained on. And so we could like, there are lots of ways to tweak the training data to refer to high quality content that we want. Yeah. I would say also this, like this slop that is returned by, by traditional search engines, like Google and Bing, you have the slop is then, uh, transferred into the, these LLMs in like a search GBT or, you know, our other systems like that. Like if slop comes in, slop will go out. And so, yeah, that's another answer to how we're different is like, we're not like traditional search engines. We want to give like the highest quality results and like have full control over whatever you want. If you don't want slop, you get that. And then if you put an LM on top of that, which our customers do, then you just get higher quality results or high quality output.Alessio [00:25:06]: And I use Excel search very often and it's very good. Especially.Swyx [00:25:09]: Wave uses it too.Alessio [00:25:10]: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Like the slop is everywhere, especially when it comes to AI, when it comes to investment. When it comes to all of these things for like, it's valuable to be at the top. And this problem is only going to get worse because. Yeah, no, it's totally. What else is in the toolkit? So you have search API, you have ExaSearch, kind of like the web version. Now you have the list builder. I think you also have web scraping. Maybe just touch on that. Like, I guess maybe people, they want to search and then they want to scrape. Right. So is that kind of the use case that people have? Yeah.Will [00:25:41]: A lot of our customers, they don't just want, because they're building AI applications on top of Exa, they don't just want a list of URLs. They actually want. Like the full content, like cleans, parsed. Markdown. Markdown, maybe chunked, whatever they want, we'll give it to them. And so that's been like huge for customers. Just like getting the URLs and instantly getting the content for each URL is like, and you can do this for 10 or 100 or 1,000 URLs, wherever you want. That's very powerful.Swyx [00:26:05]: Yeah. I think this is the first thing I asked you for when I tried using Exa.Will [00:26:09]: Funny story is like when I built the first version of Exa, it's like, we just happened to store the content. Yes. Like the first 1,024 tokens. Because I just kind of like kept it because I thought of, you know, I don't know why. Really for debugging purposes. And so then when people started asking for content, it was actually pretty easy to serve it. But then, and then we did that, like Exa took off. So the computer's content was so useful. So that was kind of cool.Swyx [00:26:30]: It is. I would say there are other players like Gina, I think is in this space. Firecrawl is in this space. There's a bunch of scraper companies. And obviously scraper is just one part of your stack, but you might as well offer it since you already do it.Will [00:26:43]: Yeah, it makes sense. It's just easy to have an all-in-one solution. And like. We are, you know, building the best scraper in the world. So scraping is a hard problem and it's easy to get like, you know, a good scraper. It's very hard to get a great scraper and it's super hard to get a perfect scraper. So like, and, and scraping really matters to people. Do you have a perfect scraper? Not yet. Okay.Swyx [00:27:05]: The web is increasingly closing to the bots and the scrapers, Twitter, Reddit, Quora, Stack Overflow. I don't know what else. How are you dealing with that? How are you navigating those things? Like, you know. You know, opening your eyes, like just paying them money.Will [00:27:19]: Yeah, no, I mean, I think it definitely makes it harder for search engines. One response is just that there's so much value in the long tail of sites that are open. Okay. Um, and just like, even just searching over those well gets you most of the value. But I mean, there, there is definitely a lot of content that is increasingly not unavailable. And so you could get through that through data partnerships. The bigger we get as a company, the more, the easier it is to just like, uh, make partnerships. But I, I mean, I do see the world as like the future where the. The data, the, the data producers, the content creators will make partnerships with the entities that find that data.Alessio [00:27:53]: Any other fun use case that maybe people are not thinking about? Yeah.Will [00:27:58]: Oh, I mean, uh, there are so many customers. Yeah. What are people doing on AXA? Well, I think dating is a really interesting, uh, application of search that is completely underserved because there's a lot of profiles on the web and a lot of people who want to find love and that I'll use it. They give me. Like, you know, age boundaries, you know, education level location. Yeah. I mean, you want to, what, what do you want to do with data? You want to find like a partner who matches this education level, who like, you know, maybe has written about these types of topics before. Like if you could get a list of all the people like that, like, I think you will unblock a lot of people. I mean, there, I mean, I think this is a very Silicon Valley view of dating for sure. And I'm, I'm well aware of that, but it's just an interesting application of like, you know, I would love to meet like an intellectual partner, um, who like shares a lot of ideas. Yeah. Like if you could do that through better search and yeah.Swyx [00:28:48]: But what is it with Jeff? Jeff has already set me up with a few people. So like Jeff, I think it's my personal exit.Will [00:28:55]: my mom's actually a matchmaker and has got a lot of married. Yeah. No kidding. Yeah. Yeah. Search is built into the book. It's in your jeans. Yeah. Yeah.Swyx [00:29:02]: Yeah. Other than dating, like I know you're having quite some success in colleges. I would just love to map out some more use cases so that our listeners can just use those examples to think about use cases for XR, right? Because it's such a general technology that it's hard to. Uh, really pin down, like, what should I use it for and what kind of products can I build with it?Will [00:29:20]: Yeah, sure. So, I mean, there are so many applications of XR and we have, you know, many, many companies using us for very diverse range of use cases, but I'll just highlight some interesting ones. Like one customer, a big customer is using us to, um, basically build like a, a writing assistant for students who want to write, uh, research papers. And basically like XR will search for, uh, like a list of research papers related to what the student is writing. And then this product has. Has like an LLM that like summarizes the papers to basically it's like a next word prediction, but in, uh, you know, prompted by like, you know, 20 research papers that X has returned. It's like literally just doing their homework for them. Yeah. Yeah. the key point is like, it's, it's, uh, you know, it's, it's, you know, research is, is a really hard thing to do and you need like high quality content as input.Swyx [00:30:08]: Oh, so we've had illicit on the podcast. I think it's pretty similar. Uh, they, they do focus pretty much on just, just research papers and, and that research. Basically, I think dating, uh, research, like I just wanted to like spell out more things, like just the big verticals.Will [00:30:23]: Yeah, yeah, no, I mean, there, there are so many use cases. So finance we talked about, yeah. I mean, one big vertical is just finding a list of companies, uh, so it's useful for VCs, like you said, who want to find like a list of competitors to a specific company they're investigating or just a list of companies in some field. Like, uh, there was one VC that told me that him and his team, like we're using XR for like eight hours straight. Like, like that. For many days on end, just like, like, uh, doing like lots of different queries of different types, like, oh, like all the companies in AI for law or, uh, all the companies for AI for, uh, construction and just like getting lists of things because you just can't find this information with, with traditional search engines. And then, you know, finding companies is also useful for, for selling. If you want to find, you know, like if we want to find a list of, uh, writing assistants to sell to, then we can just, we just use XR ourselves to find that is actually how we found a lot of our customers. Ooh, you can find your own customers using XR. Oh my God. I, in the spirit of. Uh, using XR to bolster XR, like recruiting is really helpful. It is really great use case of XR, um, because we can just get like a list of, you know, people who thought about search and just get like a long list and then, you know, reach out to those people.Swyx [00:31:29]: When you say thought about, are you, are you thinking LinkedIn, Twitter, or are you thinking just blogs?Will [00:31:33]: Or they've written, I mean, it's pretty general. So in that case, like ideally XR would return like the, the really blogs written by people who have just. So if I don't blog, I don't show up to XR, right? Like I have to blog. well, I mean, you could show up. That's like an incentive for people to blog.Swyx [00:31:47]: Well, if you've written about, uh, search in on Twitter and we, we do, we do index a bunch of tweets and then we, we should be able to service that. Yeah. Um, I mean, this is something I tell people, like you have to make yourself discoverable to the web, uh, you know, it's called learning in public, but like, it's even more imperative now because otherwise you don't exist at all.Will [00:32:07]: Yeah, no, no, this is a huge, uh, thing, which is like search engines completely influence. They have downstream effects. They influence the internet itself. They influence what people. Choose to create. And so Google, because they're a keyword based search engine, people like kind of like keyword stuff. Yeah. They're, they're, they're incentivized to create things that just match a lot of keywords, which is not very high quality. Uh, whereas XR is a search algorithm that, uh, optimizes for like high quality and actually like matching what you mean. And so people are incentivized to create content that is high quality, that like the create content that they know will be found by the right person. So like, you know, if I am a search researcher and I want to be found. By XR, I should blog about search and all the things I'm building because, because now we have a search engine like XR that's powerful enough to find them. And so the search engine will influence like the downstream internet in all sorts of amazing ways. Yeah. Uh, whatever the search engine optimizes for is what the internet looks like. Yeah.Swyx [00:33:01]: Are you familiar with the term? McLuhanism? No, it's not. Uh, it's this concept that, uh, like first we shape tools and then the tools shape us. Okay. Yeah. Uh, so there's like this reflexive connection between the things we search for and the things that get searched. Yes. So like once you change the tool. The tool that searches the, the, the things that get searched also change. Yes.Will [00:33:18]: I mean, there was a clear example of that with 30 years of Google. Yeah, exactly. Google has basically trained us to think of search and Google has Google is search like in people's heads. Right. It's one, uh, hard part about XR is like, uh, ripping people away from that notion of search and expanding their sense of what search could be. Because like when people think search, they think like a few keywords, or at least they used to, they think of a few keywords and that's it. They don't think to make these like really complex paragraph long requests for information and get a perfect list. ChatGPT was an interesting like thing that expanded people's understanding of search because you start using ChatGPT for a few hours and you go back to Google and you like paste in your code and Google just doesn't work and you're like, oh, wait, it, Google doesn't do work that way. So like ChatGPT expanded our understanding of what search can be. And I think XR is, uh, is part of that. We want to expand people's notion, like, Hey, you could actually get whatever you want. Yeah.Alessio [00:34:06]: I search on XR right now, people writing about learning in public. I was like, is it gonna come out with Alessio? Am I, am I there? You're not because. Bro. It's. So, no, it's, it's so about, because it thinks about learning, like in public, like public schools and like focuses more on that. You know, it's like how, when there are like these highly overlapping things, like this is like a good result based on the query, you know, but like, how do I get to Alessio? Right. So if you're like in these subcultures, I don't think this would work in Google well either, you know, but I, I don't know if you have any learnings.Swyx [00:34:40]: No, I'm the first result on Google.Alessio [00:34:42]: People writing about learning. In public, you're not first result anymore, I guess.Swyx [00:34:48]: Just type learning public in Google.Alessio [00:34:49]: Well, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. But this is also like, this is in Google, it doesn't work either. That's what I'm saying. It's like how, when you have like a movement.Will [00:34:56]: There's confusion about the, like what you mean, like your intention is a little, uh. Yeah.Alessio [00:35:00]: It's like, yeah, I'm using, I'm using a term that like I didn't invent, but I'm kind of taking over, but like, they're just so much about that term already that it's hard to overcome. If that makes sense, because public schools is like, well, it's, it's hard to overcome.Will [00:35:14]: Public schools, you know, so there's the right solution to this, which is to specify more clearly what you mean. And I'm not expecting you to do that, but so the, the right interface to search is actually an LLM.Swyx [00:35:25]: Like you should be talking to an LLM about what you want and the LLM translates its knowledge of you or knowledge of what people usually mean into a query that excellent uses, which you have called auto prompts, right?Will [00:35:35]: Or, yeah, but it's like a very light version of that. And really it's just basically the right answer is it's the wrong interface and like very soon interface to search and really to everything will be LLM. And the LLM just has a full knowledge of you, right? So we're kind of building for that world. We're skating to where the puck is going to be. And so since we're moving to a world where like LLMs are interfaced to everything, you should build a search engine that can handle complex LLM queries, queries that come from LLMs. Because you're probably too lazy, I'm too lazy too, to write like a whole paragraph explaining, okay, this is what I mean by this word. But an LLM is not lazy. And so like the LLM will spit out like a paragraph or more explaining exactly what it wants. You need a search engine that can handle that. Traditional search engines like Google or Bing, they're actually... Designed for humans typing keywords. If you give a paragraph to Google or Bing, they just completely fail. And so Exa can handle paragraphs and we want to be able to handle it more and more until it's like perfect.Alessio [00:36:24]: What about opinions? Do you have lists? When you think about the list product, do you think about just finding entries? Do you think about ranking entries? I'll give you a dumb example. So on Lindy, I've been building the spot that every week gives me like the top fantasy football waiver pickups. But every website is like different opinions. I'm like, you should pick up. These five players, these five players. When you're making lists, do you want to be kind of like also ranking and like telling people what's best? Or like, are you mostly focused on just surfacing information?Will [00:36:56]: There's a really good distinction between filtering to like things that match your query and then ranking based on like what is like your preferences. And ranking is like filtering is objective. It's like, does this document match what you asked for? Whereas ranking is more subjective. It's like, what is the best? Well, it depends what you mean by best, right? So first, first table stakes is let's get the filtering into a perfect place where you actually like every document matches what you asked for. No surgeon can do that today. And then ranking, you know, there are all sorts of interesting ways to do that where like you've maybe for, you know, have the user like specify more clearly what they mean by best. You could do it. And if the user doesn't specify, you do your best, you do your best based on what people typically mean by best. But ideally, like the user can specify, oh, when I mean best, I actually mean ranked by the, you know, the number of people who visited that site. Let's say is, is one example ranking or, oh, what I mean by best, let's say you're listing companies. What I mean by best is like the ones that have, uh, you know, have the most employees or something like that. Like there are all sorts of ways to rank a list of results that are not captured by something as subjective as best. Yeah. Yeah.Alessio [00:38:00]: I mean, it's like, who are the best NBA players in the history? It's like everybody has their own. Right.Will [00:38:06]: Right. But I mean, the, the, the search engine should definitely like, even if you don't specify it, it should do as good of a job as possible. Yeah. Yeah. No, no, totally. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's a new topic to people because we're not used to a search engine that can handle like a very complex ranking system. Like you think to type in best basketball players and not something more specific because you know, that's the only thing Google could handle. But if Google could handle like, oh, basketball players ranked by like number of shots scored on average per game, then you would do that. But you know, they can't do that. So.Swyx [00:38:32]: Yeah. That's fascinating. So you haven't used the word agents, but you're kind of building a search agent. Do you believe that that is agentic in feature? Do you think that term is distracting?Will [00:38:42]: I think it's a good term. I do think everything will eventually become agentic. And so then the term will lose power, but yes, like what we're building is agentic it in a sense that it takes actions. It decides when to go deeper into something, it has a loop, right? It feels different from traditional search, which is like an algorithm, not an agent. Ours is a combination of an algorithm and an agent.Swyx [00:39:05]: I think my reflection from seeing this in the coding space where there's basically sort of classic. Framework for thinking about this stuff is the self-driving levels of autonomy, right? Level one to five, typically the level five ones all failed because there's full autonomy and we're not, we're not there yet. And people like control. People like to be in the loop. So the, the, the level ones was co-pilot first and now it's like cursor and whatever. So I feel like if it's too agentic, it's too magical, like, like a, like a one shot, I stick a, stick a paragraph into the text box and then it spits it back to me. It might feel like I'm too disconnected from the process and I don't trust it. As opposed to something where I'm more intimately involved with the research product. I see. So like, uh, wait, so the earlier versions are, so if trying to stick to the example of the basketball thing, like best basketball player, but instead of best, you, you actually get to customize it with like, whatever the metric is that you, you guys care about. Yeah. I'm still not a basketballer, but, uh, but, but, you know, like, like B people like to be in my, my thesis is that agents level five agents failed because people like to. To kind of have drive assist rather than full self-driving.Will [00:40:15]: I mean, a lot of this has to do with how good agents are. Like at some point, if agents for coding are better than humans at all tests and then humans block, yeah, we're not there yet.Swyx [00:40:25]: So like in a world where we're not there yet, what you're pitching us is like, you're, you're kind of saying you're going all the way there. Like I kind of, I think all one is also very full, full self-driving. You don't get to see the plan. You don't get to affect the plan yet. You just fire off a query and then it goes away for a couple of minutes and comes back. Right. Which is effectively what you're saying you're going to do too. And you think there's.Will [00:40:42]: There's a, there's an in-between. I saw. Okay. So in building this product, we're exploring new interfaces because what does it mean to kick off a search that goes and takes 10 minutes? Like, is that a good interface? Because what if the search is actually wrong or it's not exactly, exactly specified to what you mean, which is why you get previews. Yeah. You get previews. So it is iterative, but ultimately once you've specified exactly what you mean, then you kind of do just want to kick off a batch job. Right. So perhaps what you're getting at is like, uh, there's this barrier with agents where you have to like explain the full context of what you mean, and a lot of failure modes happen when you have, when you don't. Yeah. There's failure modes from the agent, just not being smart enough. And then there's failure modes from the agent, not understanding exactly what you mean. And there's a lot of context that is shared between humans that is like lost between like humans and, and this like new creature.Alessio [00:41:32]: Yeah. Yeah. Because people don't know what's going on. I mean, to me, the best example of like system prompts is like, why are you writing? You're a helpful assistant. Like. Of course you should be an awful, but people don't yet know, like, can I assume that, you know, that, you know, it's like, why did the, and now people write, oh, you're a very smart software engineer, but like, you never made, you never make mistakes. Like, were you going to try and make mistakes before? So I think people don't yet have an understanding, like with, with driving people know what good driving is. It's like, don't crash, stay within kind of like a certain speed range. It's like, follow the directions. It's like, I don't really have to explain all of those things. I hope. But with. AI and like models and like search, people are like, okay, what do you actually know? What are like your assumptions about how search, how you're going to do search? And like, can I trust it? You know, can I influence it? So I think that's kind of the, the middle ground, like before you go ahead and like do all the search, it's like, can I see how you're doing it? And then maybe help show your work kind of like, yeah, steer you. Yeah. Yeah.Will [00:42:32]: No, I mean, yeah. Sure. Saying, even if you've crafted a great system prompt, you want to be part of the process itself. Uh, because the system prompt doesn't, it doesn't capture everything. Right. So yeah. A system prompt is like, you get to choose the person you work with. It's like, oh, like I want, I want a software engineer who thinks this way about code. But then even once you've chosen that person, you can't just give them a high level command and they go do it perfectly. You have to be part of that process. So yeah, I agree.Swyx [00:42:58]: Just a side note for my system, my favorite system, prompt programming anecdote now is the Apple intelligence system prompt that someone, someone's a prompt injected it and seen it. And like the Apple. Intelligence has the words, like, please don't, don't hallucinate. And it's like, of course we don't want you to hallucinate. Right. Like, so it's exactly that, that what you're talking about, like we should train this behavior into the model, but somehow we still feel the need to inject into the prompt. And I still don't even think that we are very scientific about it. Like it, I think it's almost like cargo culting. Like we have this like magical, like turn around three times, throw salt over your shoulder before you do something. And like, it worked the last time. So let's just do it the same time now. And like, we do, there's no science to this.Will [00:43:35]: I do think a lot of these problems might be ironed out in future versions. Right. So, and like, they might, they might hide the details from you. So it's like, they actually, all of them have a system prompt. That's like, you are a helpful assistant. You don't actually have to include it, even though it might actually be the way they've implemented in the backend. It should be done in RLE AF.Swyx [00:43:52]: Okay. Uh, one question I was just kind of curious about this episode is I'm going to try to frame this in terms of this, the general AI search wars, you know, you're, you're one player in that, um, there's perplexity, chat, GPT, search, and Google, but there's also like the B2B side, uh, we had. Drew Houston from Dropbox on, and he's competing with Glean, who've, uh, we've also had DD from, from Glean on, is there an appetite for Exa for my company's documents?Will [00:44:19]: There is appetite, but I think we have to be disciplined, focused, disciplined. I mean, we're already taking on like perfect web search, which is a lot. Um, but I mean, ultimately we want to build a perfect search engine, which definitely for a lot of queries involves your, your personal information, your company's information. And so, yeah, I mean, the grandest vision of Exa is perfect search really over everything, every domain, you know, we're going to have an Exa satellite, uh, because, because satellites can gather information that, uh, is not available publicly. Uh, gotcha. Yeah.Alessio [00:44:51]: Can we talk about AGI? We never, we never talk about AGI, but you had, uh, this whole tweet about, oh, one being the biggest kind of like AI step function towards it. Why does it feel so important to you? I know there's kind of like always criticism and saying, Hey, it's not the smartest son is better. It's like, blah, blah, blah. What? You choose C. So you say, this is what Ilias see or Sam see what they will see.Will [00:45:13]: I've just, I've just, you know, been connecting the dots. I mean, this was the key thing that a bunch of labs were working on, which is like, can you create a reward signal? Can you teach yourself based on a reward signal? Whether you're, if you're trying to learn coding or math, if you could have one model say, uh, be a grading system that says like you have successfully solved this programming assessment and then one model, like be the generative system. That's like, here are a bunch of programming assessments. You could train on that. It's basically whenever you could create a reward signal for some task, you could just generate a bunch of tasks for yourself. See that like, oh, on two of these thousand, you did well. And then you just train on that data. It's basically like, I mean, creating your own data for yourself and like, you know, all the labs working on that opening, I built the most impressive product doing that. And it's just very, it's very easy now to see how that could like scale to just solving, like, like solving programming or solving mathematics, which sounds crazy, but everything about our world right now is crazy.Alessio [00:46:07]: Um, and so I think if you remove that whole, like, oh, that's impossible, and you just think really clearly about like, what's now possible with like what, what they've done with O1, it's easy to see how that scales. How do you think about older GPT models then? Should people still work on them? You know, if like, obviously they just had the new Haiku, like, is it even worth spending time, like making these models better versus just, you know, Sam talked about O2 at that day. So obviously they're, they're spending a lot of time in it, but then you have maybe. The GPU poor, which are still working on making Lama good. Uh, and then you have the follower labs that do not have an O1 like model out yet. Yeah.Will [00:46:47]: This kind of gets into like, uh, what will the ecosystem of, of models be like in the future? And is there room is, is everything just gonna be O1 like models? I think, well, I mean, there's definitely a question of like inference speed and if certain things like O1 takes a long time, because that's the thing. Well, I mean, O1 is, is two things. It's like one it's it's use it's bootstrapping itself. It's teaching itself. And so the base model is smarter. But then it also has this like inference time compute where it could like spend like many minutes or many hours thinking. And so even the base model, which is also fast, it doesn't have to take minutes. It could take is, is better, smarter. I believe all models will be trained with this paradigm. Like you'll want to train on the best data, but there will be many different size models from different, very many different like companies, I believe. Yeah. Because like, I don't, yeah, I mean, it's hard, hard to predict, but I don't think opening eye is going to dominate like every possible LLM for every possible. Use case. I think for a lot of things, like you just want the fastest model and that might not involve O1 methods at all.Swyx [00:47:42]: I would say if you were to take the exit being O1 for search, literally, you really need to prioritize search trajectories, like almost maybe paying a bunch of grad students to go research things. And then you kind of track what they search and what the sequence of searching is, because it seems like that is the gold mine here, like the chain of thought or the thinking trajectory. Yeah.Will [00:48:05]: When it comes to search, I've always been skeptical. I've always been skeptical of human labeled data. Okay. Yeah, please. We tried something at our company at Exa recently where me and a bunch of engineers on the team like labeled a bunch of queries and it was really hard. Like, you know, you have all these niche queries and you're looking at a bunch of results and you're trying to identify which is matched to query. It's talking about, you know, the intricacies of like some biological experiment or something. I have no idea. Like, I don't know what matches and what, what labelers like me tend to do is just match by keyword. I'm like, oh, I don't know. Oh, like this document matches a bunch of keywords, so it must be good. But then you're actually completely missing the meaning of the document. Whereas an LLM like GB4 is really good at labeling. And so I actually think like you just we get by, which we are right now doing using like LLM

Гость выпуска - Антон Шингарев, вице-президент по взаимодействию с государственными органами компании AVRide, приглашенный профессор Техасского университета в Остине. Мы обсудили концепцию технологического суверенитета, возможности и ограничения "цифровой независимости" в современном мире. Поговорили о том, как государство влияет на развитие технологий и IT-компаний в США, России и Китае. Затронули вопросы регулирования, налогообложения и субсидирования IT-индустрии. Антон поделился мнением о перспективах удаленной работы и влиянии геополитики на этот тренд. Мы также порассуждали о том, как искусственный интеллект меняет работу IT-специалистов и какие профессии находятся в зоне риска. В завершение дали советы тем, кто хочет строить карьеру в США. Антон Шингарев (Anton Shingarev) - Вице-президент по взаимоотношению с госорганами AVride (роботы по доставке товаров и продуктов), до этого работал в компании Yandex, Касперский. Приглашенный Профессор Техасского университета в Остине. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shingarev/ *** Записывайтесь на карьерную консультацию (резюме, LinkedIn, карьерная стратегия, поиск работы в США): https://annanaumova.com Коучинг (синдром самозванца, прокрастинация, неуверенность в себе, страхи, лень) https://annanaumova.notion.site/3f6ea5ce89694c93afb1156df3c903ab Онлайн курс "Идеальное резюме и поиск работы в США": https://go.mbastrategy.com/resumecoursemain Гайд "Идеальное американское резюме": https://go.mbastrategy.com/usresume Гайд "Как оформить профиль в LinkedIn, чтобы рекрутеры не смогли пройти мимо": https://go.mbastrategy.com/linkedinguide Мой Telegram-канал: https://t.me/prodcastUSA Мой Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/prodcast.us/ Prodcast в соцсетях и на всех подкаст платформах https://linktr.ee/prodcastUS ⏰ Timecodes ⏰ 0:00 Начало 12:45 Расскажи про свой курс "Технологический суверенитет и глобальная власть" 23:30 Как ты попал в университет Техаса? 28:21 Что такое технологический суверенитет? 39:14 Как государства влияют на развитие технологий и технологических компаний? 45:37 Китайский импорт при Трампе 48:27 Различия между российским и американским подходами к технологическому суверенитету 1:01:12 Как государства используют технологии? 1:04:02 Как изменится удаленка? Какие специальности станут более востребованными? 1:09:57 Как на работу айтишников повлияет ИИ? 1:19:06 Что иммигрантам из Восточной Европы ждать от 2025 года? 1:22:00 Что можешь пожелать тем, кто сейчас ищет работу в США?

Что ждать от 2025? Как меняются приоритеты венчурных фондов? Какие сектора IT привлекают наибольшие инвестиции? Какие проблемы пытаются решить современные стартапы? В каких нишах появляются новые возможности? Какие технологические тренды будут в 2025 году? В каких отраслях ожидается наибольшее влияние ИИ? Какие специальности становятся наиболее востребованными? Как меняются требования к IT-специалистам? Какие новые профессии могут появиться? Алексей Моисеенков (Alexey Moiseenkov), Director of Products в Xsolla, ex-CEO & co-founder LF.Group (acquired by Xsolla), ex Capture, Prisma, Mail.ru, Yandex. https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexeymoiseenkov/ https://www.facebook.com/darkolorin Канал про Алексея про ИИ, стартапы и бизнес https://t.me/chillhousetech Видео с Алексеем: Как стать продакт менеджером в стартапе? Как нанять первого продакта? https://youtu.be/q2PpYpwng_o *** Записаться на карьерную консультацию (резюме, LinkedIn, карьерная стратегия, поиск работы в США) https://annanaumova.com Коучинг (синдром самозванца, прокрастинация, неуверенность в себе, страхи, лень) https://annanaumova.notion.site/3f6ea5ce89694c93afb1156df3c903ab Видео курс по составлению резюме для международных компаний "Идеальное американское резюме": https://go.mbastrategy.com/resumecoursemain Гайд "Идеальное американское резюме" https://go.mbastrategy.com/usresume Подписывайтесь на мой Телеграм канал: https://t.me/prodcastUSA Подписывайтесь на мой Инстаграм https://www.instagram.com/prodcast.us Гайд "Как оформить профиль в LinkedIn, чтобы рекрутеры не смогли пройти мимо" https://go.mbastrategy.com/linkedinguide ⏰ Timecodes ⏰ 0:00 Начало 7:18 Ситуация на рынке IT в 2024 24:31 Куда вкладывают деньги, кроме AI? 48:11 Будущее продактов и проджектов 1:02:43 Что изменится в 2025? 1:21:19 Подводим итоги

Producing video is a big priority in employer branding, so how do you do it effectively? I was invited to the podcast zone, sponsored by Yandex, at the Empple Employer Branding Festival in Belgrade this October. In this episode recorded at the Empple Employer Branding Festival in Belgrade, we dive into the world of employer branding content with Benjamin Kesler. We explore his philosophy that great employer branding content production relies on creation AND distribution. Whether you're new to employer branding or looking to enhance your content strategy, this episode delivers practical insights for creating authentic content that truly resonates with your target audience.

This week, I'm excited to welcome Dr Jack Kruse. Dr Kruse is a board certified neurosurgeon, health educator, and proponent of unconventional health and wellness practices. Dr. Kruse's philosophy often challenges conventional medical approaches, emphasizing the importance of natural living and reconnecting with ancestral health principles. In this episode, Dr Kruse explains the current state of play around decentralised medicine. View all episodes at www.thehealthsessions.com.au Learn more about Dr Jack Kruse at https://jackkruse.com Episode Transcript: Stuart Cooke (00:01.252) Hey guys, this is Stu from the Health Sessions and I am delighted to welcome Dr. Jack Cruz to the podcast. Dr. Cruz, how are you? Yeah, I'm very well, very well indeed. Very excited to have this conversation. But first up for all of our listeners that may not be familiar with you or your work, I'd love it you could just share a little about yourself, please. Dr Jack Kruse (00:08.76) Pretty good, how about you? Dr Jack Kruse (00:21.976) Yeah, I'm a board certified neurosurgeon in the United States. I have been living in El Salvador for the last four years. When COVID hit, I began to question a lot of the things that were present, and I decided to unretire, go back and do trauma call to see if they were lying to us or not. And I found out that they were. So then I decided to do something about it. and I wound up presenting to the Bukele administration in El Salvador and they shared some of their country-wide data with me and things that they were facing. And they asked me, what did I think was the solution? And I told them, I think you need to have a constitutional amendment put into your constitution so this would never happen again. And I think you need to re-educate some of the people in your health ministry, I think. You need to educate the doctors. You need to tell people the truth. You need to have freedom of the press. You need to embrace freedom. And this was an easy message for Bukele because he gave his people freedom almost as soon as he got elected the first time in 2019, 2020 made Bitcoin legal tender. And that basically returns freedom back to people and their, and their money. So since he did that first, and then he cleaned up the crime problem in the country, fixing the next problem actually was pretty easy. The real hard part, since you're Australian, I can imagine you know this because it's still going on in your country, that you can't get even people to admit that there was a problem with COVID. And if you can't admit there's a problem, you can't solve for X. And that's kind of where we're going. And then after me helping President Bukele, then... Stuart Cooke (01:59.77) Mm-hmm. Dr Jack Kruse (02:16.854) that information started to bleed into Bobby Kennedy's vice presidential candidate, Nicole Shanahan. And then Bobby called me about the law and then they started to use the law in their campaign. And then next year, know, this summer he joins forces with Donald Trump and then Donald Trump has got the message now too. So I would consider myself more of a lethal pathogen for probably the COVID narrative than most other people that you could probably have on. Stuart Cooke (02:45.957) Fantastic, wow, that is quite an introduction. And very interesting times ahead. Let's see what happens. mean, game on. Everything that we've been speaking about in the counterculture world of health, wellness and human performance is about to take centre stage. So really, really interested. So coming from a traditional medicine background into being one of the... one of the leaders in the biohacking and wellness space now. How do you look at traditional medicine right now? Dr Jack Kruse (03:16.664) Traditional medicine is like a sweet on the Titanic. They would like to renovate it and I would like the boat to sink. Why? Because we've gone past the point, you know, it's like a patient with metastatic cancer in just about every Oregon. You know, the time to fix it was to do the prevention earlier, but you have to realize that Stuart Cooke (03:26.829) Right. Dr Jack Kruse (03:42.636) The people that control big pharma really are the bankers. It's a, it's a very big story. And when I mean big, complicated because it's a Leviathan to know where all the missing pieces and parts are, you know, it take a lot longer time than you have allocated to talk to me. But in the last, I would say six months in the United States, I have been doing a ton of podcasts. Why? Because people in the United States, unlike probably Australia, unlike Canada, unlike Europe, they're ready for this discussion about really what happened. And I think, you know, the people in the States voted that way on November 5th, that they were sick and tired of being lied to. And we didn't go down the path that, you know, Canada went, you guys went, Europe went, or even places like South America went. We decided that we're still for the freedom of speech. Stuart Cooke (04:16.12) Hmm. Dr Jack Kruse (04:42.456) And we're still fighting for the truth. We're not going to have digital IDs or we're saying right now that we're not going to have central bank digital coins. But I don't know if that's going to be true or not. I think there may be a path to that because the people that truly control the United States, which are the bankers and the industrial military complex, may have different designs because effectively, you know, what Trump and Bobby Kennedy are bringing to the table right now, really is the vaccine for Big Pharma. It's really the vaccine for the bankers. It's quite a lot to swallow. And like I said, one of my good friends in this story, Kevin McKiernan, who's the person that found SV40 in the jabs, said it's kind of like expecting Trunk and Bobby to go into the Death Star and somehow make Darth Vader nice. I don't know if that's really possible. But I certainly think that it's worth an opportunity to do it. I think other places in the world have actually got collateral effects from COVID. And that's actually what the people who were doing this, the Agenda 201 people, the WEF people, I know there's a lot of people in Australia that are now really fighting hard against this. But you guys already got digital ID. You guys are. are headed towards a CBDC. you know, basically they're interested in making us economic slaves on the plantation. And it's kind of the way in which they've done it is, I'm going to tell you, it's brilliant. It's a brilliant plan. It's been crafted over 120 years and they've done small little changes, insidious changes that you're like, come on, this isn't that bad. But when you add the whole collection up, you know, it's not a good situation. And they've used medical tyranny to pull it off. They've also used financialization, you know, through rehypothecation of money. That's actually the base problem for every country, including my own. And it's actually the base problem that was here in El Salvador. But El Salvador was the one country who started to reverse this trend because during their civil war, Dr Jack Kruse (07:09.292) that the United States CIA effectively started, you know, 30 years ago, they lost their fiat currency called the Cologne and they started to use, you know, U.S. dollars as their economy. So they're completely, you know, dollarized and that creates, you know, a huge problem. when Bukele got in and broke the cycle of corruption that was down here, the first thing he did was, I'm going to give my people a parallel monetary system. that's not tied to the Federal Reserve. And I don't think people like all over the world realize how big a thing that was. And believe it or not, that's actually what got me to come to El Salvador because I realized that this type of maneuver was like what George Washington did for the United States where was, but Kelly was like George Washington on steroids. Why? Most people don't know the history. of the United States well enough, especially you guys, since you're a commonwealth. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison wrote in Federalist Papers before our founding documents were done. They actually had fights with each other and a guy named Alexander Hamilton, which you probably heard. And Jefferson was ardent that the biggest problem with the Bank of England was that their level of usury. and also the way the bank handled business. And he said that no government will ever be successful if you allow the bankers to have this level of control. And Alexander Hamilton took the other side and said, well, that's all well and good, but if you're to create a country like we're trying to do here in the United States, you still have to have a monetary system. right now, going back to the Magna Carta, the Britons have done a pretty good job for about 1,000 years. Why don't we just roll with that until something comes up? And we didn't have a better form of money, you know, at that time. But the funniest part of the story is when Jefferson becomes president after George Washington, his vice president, Aaron Burr, kills Alexander Hamilton in a duel. Like this problem has not gone away in the United States. And I would say to you, it went all the way up into the Bitcoin Nashville event in Dr Jack Kruse (09:29.816) You know, July this year, when you had both Trump and Bobby, when they were both running for president, both of them said that they were about making Bitcoin a reserve currency to back the US dollar, you know, to make it affect how it used to be prior to 1971 when it was backed up by gold. And that's a good step. You know, for me as a Bitcoin maximus, it's not what I want to see. But is that a really positive step? you know, for the United States, yes. If it's a positive stuff for the United States, when we do something, everybody else usually follows. The interesting part is, I don't think Britain is gonna be doing that now because what did they do in their election? They voted for a version of Kamala Harris with a penis. That's called pure scarmor. And generally what the UK does, that's what Canada does, that's what Australia does. And a lot of times the same thing is true with Europe. But this is the first time I can tell you, think, maybe since World War I, when the United States and Britain have gone two different paths. Trump is radically different than King Charles. And in a good way, King Charles is trying to bring the UK and the Commonwealth back to the Dark Ages, medievalism, feudalism, you know, some, I think you guys call it Fabianism, because it's a version of you know, communism, but that's good for a monarchy. And, you know, I'm perfectly fine if the people of Australia, Canada, and the UK are cool with that because, you let's face it, you guys lived with it for a really long time. But that version of bullshit doesn't follow in the United States. Remember, we are the misfits that told the king to kiss our ass in 1774. So I can tell you that I am the latest iteration of that asshole. in 2024 because I don't want any part of what England's doing. I don't want any part of what Australia is doing. I don't want any part of what Canada is doing. I like our founding documents. And this was the case that I made to Bukele in his basement. I actually had to teach him the story that Jefferson went through with a guy named Benjamin Rush. The only remnants that you'll ever hear about Benjamin Rush from anybody else, he was a Dr Jack Kruse (11:57.706) a doctor and a politician who is originally British. You know, he was born in the States, but he had lots of ties to England because remember, we're effectively British just like you guys are in the States. And what Benjamin said that we needed to put a constitutional amendment in our founding documents and the founding fathers who are writing these papers, they went back for 5,000 years and couldn't find anything in human history where Medical Tierney was the attack vector to take a government down and apart. And Jefferson told him, he says, look, I think it's a good idea, but I just don't think that we can do this and do it well because it's going to slow our process down. And there was a lot of different things that went back and forth if you read the Federalist Papers. But I told Bukele the story, and that's when Bukele said to me, so you think that's the best plan of attack? I said, yeah, it is. Because if you try to use lawfare, like having lawyers go after Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca. That's gonna be a giant shit show, especially in the United States. And the reason why is most people don't know this, and I know you guys are just waking up to this, but who is the distributor of the jab? It's the Department of Defense in the United States government. It wasn't Big Pharma. Big Pharma acted like the local street dealers that sell cocaine on the streets. The guy who is the big cartel in Columbia selling the jab is the Department of Defense. This came directly from a bio weapons program that I laid out on some of the podcasts that I had told you about earlier. The specific one is the Danny Jones podcast where I really let it all hang out. And when you find out that the original SV-40 problem showed up in 1951 through 1957 in the polio jabs by Salk, And now we have proof positive that they're present in the jab. 75 years later, you gotta ask yourself a question unless you're completely brain dead. How does, how does SV 40 wind up in the first generation of the polio vaccine and now in these brand new, supposedly cutting edge vaccines? Well, the reason why is because the program isn't what it was designed to be. It was a bio weapon that they decided to use at Dr Jack Kruse (14:24.704) a specific time to actually try to slow Trump down and get him out of office. And it was successful. And in the United States, the real big issue that happened was not only did they get Trump out, they were trying to manufacture, you know, falsified election. That's what January 6th, you know, 2020 was all about. Everybody thought that these people were trying to overthrow the government, but it was actually the opposite. The government certified a falsified election. And we now know that. If I would have told you that three or four years ago, I probably would have the FBI and CIA knocking on my door. But now we now know that things were falsified in Arizona. We know that they were falsified in Pennsylvania. We know that it were falsified here and there. But it's four years later. You can't change history once the government certifies the election on January 6th. They try to pin this insurrection on Trump, which was an absolute joke, but believe it or not, they've thrown a lot of Americans in jail over this issue. Like I know you guys in Australia, Europe, and Canada, you guys actually really bought the story hook, line, and sinker that these people were truly crazy and they were trying to overthrow their government. They were let in by the government. This was a government PsyOps. And it fits now with the narrative that we see with the aftermarket data for the four years of COVID. We are the people for the rest of the world now overturning and putting Windex on all your glass eyes just how bad this really was. So I told people early on, this is before the jabs even were coming out, I looked at the patents of Moderna and Pfizer and I noticed something very interesting, that there was two legal definitions in the Pfizer patent, one for BioNTech and another one for Pfizer. And I just looked at it and I said, this doesn't make sense to me. My initial gut feeling was that they were going to present one to the FDA and then they were going to use one that they were going to mass produce. So that way the FDA wouldn't have all the true data. And since vaccines are protected in this 1986 law, that's horrible that we have, they could unleash this as a giant experiment. Dr Jack Kruse (16:47.5) to get the jab out. I told people, I did a documentary with Robert Malone and Robert McCullough, who are two doctors here in the States that you probably have heard of. And that had to be behind a paywall because you can imagine at that time, the things that we were saying were pretty controversial. Now I was the least controversial person in the movie. Why? Because I didn't really talk too much about medicine. I talked about these two legal definitions at length. And why was I doing that? Because I knew the story in detail more than anybody knew that I knew. Now people know it because I unleashed that story on the Danny Jones podcast. And I felt that they were going to put SV40 in one of the jabs. Why? Because their development team at Pfizer wasn't as advanced as Moderna. Moderna was using an E. coli vector, which I could see in the patents. made sense to me. you know what they were doing. I still thought it was a bad idea because it didn't have any proper safety testing. But I didn't have as big a problem with Moderna as I did with the Pfizer thing. And that's what I said in the documentary. So here we go till 2022 and all of a sudden, this guy, Kevin McKiernan, for those of you in Australia who don't know him, you need to know him. In fact, he just came out on the Danny Jones podcast because I hooked him up with Danny Jones to get his end of the story down because the aftermarket data we have now is even more devastating, probably even more devastating than you know in Australia because something just got published that he did, which we'll talk a little bit about. Kevin got two vials of Pfizer jabs from two lots, tested them in 2022 and found out that the SV40 promoter was in it. He published that information on Twitter. And of course you can only imagine what happened on Twitter at that time. everything exploded, everybody that was on the opposite side, the Biden and Kamala Harris side, the Operation Warp Speed people, the big pharma, they're like, this guy's full of shit, we don't believe him. It got so bad that one of the molecular virologists who is part of the evil empire, or the dark star as we talked about before, he said, I'm gonna prove him wrong, I'm gonna do the test myself. His name's Philip Buchholz, he's at the University of South Carolina, very accomplished. Dr Jack Kruse (19:16.856) virologist who works and has lots of grants with the federal government. Lo and behold, guess what he found? He didn't prove Kevin wrong, he proved Kevin right. And to his credit, to his credit, I have to give him a lot of credit here, he immediately went to the state Senate in South Carolina and actually told the senators that this is a huge problem. Why? Because now we have to start to question other things that potentially could be going on. Because at that time, The initial pulse in the aftermarket data is that I think everybody everywhere in the world knew about the myocarditis story. We knew about the clotting story, but we had just started to see there were several people with several locks that were getting cancers who had no history of cancer at all. And they were getting not minor cancers. These were stage three and stage four cancers in very young fit people. Remember, we were all told the lie that all the fatties were going to die. And it turned out that also was a lie early on. The fatties weren't the ones dying even in the hospital. The people who are dying are the people who getting Tony Fauci's drugs and the people who got intubated. It actually was the hospital algorithmic medicine treatment, you know, that the people in big tech and what we call HARPA, which is a version of DARPA, those are the people that are Silicon Valley connected healthcare folks. came up with these algorithms to treat people with and it became obvious something was going on. So you remember when we started this podcast, I told you I was effectively retired. And when I started hearing all this story, you can only imagine Uncle Jack said, I'm going to check into this bullshit big time. So what did I do? I go back and start volunteering to do a week of trauma call and I'm spending time in the ERs and spending time in the ICUs because that's what neurosurgeons do. So I got to see the sickest of the sick. Stuart Cooke (20:55.641) Mm. Dr Jack Kruse (21:15.352) And lo and behold, what did I find over two years between actually two and a half years, 2021 through 2024? I was averaging 13 clots and at least eight to 10 cancers in a week that would show up in the hospital. And most of those were in vaccinated people. The most amazing part of my observations is that there was no unvaccinated people. that were afflicted by these problems. Like people who just had regular COVID, this truly was like the cold or the flu. And these people never sought care in the ICUs. They came to the ERs, but the ERs would send them out. They wouldn't do anything with them. The people that got admitted, they got put on these algorithms that the hospitals did. And it turned out the hospitals were incentivized by CMS is the government version of healthcare that pays for things and the government would pay for things that they wanted done. They wouldn't pay for the things that shouldn't get done. That's where you heard nobody would let us use hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin. They wouldn't let us use methylene blue. They wouldn't let us use vitamin D. And it turned out all those things for the people that were in the ER that went home, they did really well. In fact, that's actually what Bukele found. Bukele found within two months of doing the jobs, they started to notice a problem. So what did he do? Even through his own Twitter feed, started telling people, we're going to give you little bags of goodies in it that had a lot of these off-label medications. And they didn't have a huge problem. It turned out the people that got admitted and wound up having to go into the ICU who were getting drugs they shouldn't have gotten and got intubated, those are the people that died. And the story continued to get worse. Why? Because we started to see the pulse of the serious stuff, meaning these turbo cancers, the spike in the data went straight up. And for you guys in Australia who don't know this, there's a guy on Twitter that you should follow. His name is the Ethical Skeptic, at Ethical Skeptic. And he is a former Navy intelligence officer in the United States. What did he start doing? Dr Jack Kruse (23:40.856) He's good with numbers. So he started to post many different things and to show how the CDC, the FDA, and everybody was lying through these numbers. And when I saw this, plus I had my observations of being in the hospital, that's part of the reason when Bukele tapped me in 2023 to write this law. I said, you can't fix this problem in the United States with lawfare. And that's when I found out that El Salvador had assigned these special agreements with the drug manufacturers because guess what? El Salvador doesn't have a 1996 vaccine protection law. Turns out Australia doesn't either. Neither does Europe. Neither does Canada. So guess what? This should tell all of you in those countries that the politicians who were in charge at that time, they signed those documents with them. That means they're all technically a path, a legal path in your country to actually go after them soon. But this is only if the politicians aren't crooked. And it turns out in Australia, we found out they're as crooked as all get out. know, the chick that was in charge of New South Wales, she was being paid off by Fisler. We know that. So, and we also know how serious the lockdown effect was, you know, in Canada and Australia. I think you guys probably had it way worse than we did because remember, as Americans, we didn't put up with too much. And I can tell you what I did. I closed my clinic in Louisiana and moved to Florida where DeSantis was. It was business as usual. I was on the beach the whole time, you know, during COVID. And we didn't give a shit. We actually laughed at you guys. And here I was getting on planes and going to states where the COVID situation was bad. And I was actually able to go see what was happening in different areas. And of course, then I started talking to other doctors in the United States to see what their experience was. And what I found out is the zip code of where people were linked to the ideology and the politics of a specific policy. And it was much worse when you were around people who were, how shall we say, left-wing progressives, where they were taking freedom away much faster, kind of like King Charles. Dr Jack Kruse (26:02.316) you know, has advocated through his, you know, good friendship with Klaus Schott. Like, you know, his famous saying is, you'll own nothing but yet be happy about it kind of stance. You know, that's kind of what the Mararkey was all about for a long period of time. And I noticed that the states that had politicians that are in power like that had the worst outcomes. And it turned out places that should have been bad, like for example, One of the things that I did very early is I started to look at data in Africa. Nobody in Africa was getting any problems from this, even though the vaccines were given to them just about for free. But nobody took them because nobody got sick. And it turned out the ethical skeptic started showing that there was a lot of people in Equatorial Africa that were already immune to the virus. Why? Because that was proof positive the virus had gotten out earlier than anybody said. That's when I realized that we were in a giant PsyOps. This was a bioweapons program gone wrong through a lab leak in Wuhan. And we knew the link in the States because we know the story of Fauci. We know why he had to go offshore because of 9-11, because of the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act has a provision in it that we're not allowed to do gain-of-function study in the United States. If you do, it's punishable by treason. So why did the Department of Defense decide to give Anthony Fauci a 67 % raise a long time ago? Because he moved the bioweapons lab to both Wuhan and the Ukraine. Maybe that'll tell you why we have a Ukraine war going on as well, because we're protecting something that we don't want anybody else to know about. And all of this stuff starts to come free through Freedom of Information Acts. And we start to find out that his links are to this cat in a place called EcoHealth Alliance. That's the guy that basically creates all the gain and function studies that get shipped over to the bioweapons lab. Then all of a sudden the story makes sense. The aftermarket data continues in 23 and 24. And it's very clear now when you look at it that we have huge problems not only with clotting and that's with certain jabs. Like all the jabs have different Dr Jack Kruse (28:26.55) diseases associated with them. And we now know through Kevin McKiernan's work, because he's kept on this, when the turbo cancer data came up, he went to Germany and found someone who got four injections, four jabs, patient got colon cancer, the patient decided to have a biopsy done. Kevin was able to sequence the first tumor, then he did another biopsy a week later. and then he did a postmortem biopsy. And what he was looking for was the sequence in the spike protein, the sequence in the cancer, was there intercalation of the plasmid from, you know, Pfizer in the tumor itself? In other words, are you a GMO person if you took this jab? And it turned out without a doubt you are. So that proved what Philip Buchholz was really concerned about when he went to talk to the centers in South Carolina. because frame shift mutations are one cause of cancer. But the other big one is could these little plasmids that are in these jabs also show up? This made Kevin go look further. And then he found out that every single jab you get, there's 60 billion copies of DNA plasmids in each one. That's common to all the messenger RNA. See, SV40 is only in the Pfizer one. But it turns out, is there another nuclear bomb? with the other Jabs and it is, it's that there's DNA plasmids all in there. How did many of the manufacturers hide the level of plasmids in there? They made sure that they put aluminum in their Jabs. Why? Because it turns out aluminum, they'll tell you it's an adjuvant, but it's really an agglutination effect that decreases the number of plasmids so you can get it through, you know, a regulator, which in our country is the FDA and I know in your country has a different name. And I know they're under fire right now too. for some of the stuff that's going on in Australia. But this is how it went down. And this is exactly how they got the Gardasil vaccine approved in the United States as well. It was through this aluminum effect. So the question immediately came up, you know, for guys like me and Kevin, who started to communicate and also communicate with the ethical skeptic and many other researchers in the world. We're talking about Jay Badachari, Martin Kulldorf. We've all started chatting. Dr Jack Kruse (30:52.652) you know, and had our private conversations because we put this together better than the FDA, CDC, and the people in Washington, DC. We figured out the scam very, very quickly. And we started to say, these are the things that we need to start testing and looking for. We now know that in the spike protein of these German cancer patients who had colon cancer, there's sequences in there. that are not attributable to the Pfizer vaccine. So you know what that means? It means one of two things. That means this came from somewhere else, another vector, like it's out there running around, or it came from the people who manufactured the vaccine in there, meaning that this can go through jump conduction. That's a really big problem because that means that now we have a new problem to worry about. This is the latest data I'm bringing to you. It's only two weeks old. Okay, no one's talking about this. Like in the gain of function world, nobody knows what I'm telling you right now. I know nobody in Australia knows this. I imagine when you put this out, people's heads are gonna explode. But I can tell you that Kevin McKiernan just talked about this live on Danny Jones, which is the reason why I told Danny Jones to get Kevin on. podcast because this is information that you're never going to get from the Department of Defense. You're never going to get from the CDC. You're never going to get it from the FDA. Why? Because this directly exposes the fraud and the problems that were present. And not only that, this now takes this vaccine story to a true next level. This means people who took the jab, not only they potentially genetically modified humans, but they may be the source of many future pandemics down the road. And the diseases they get, this is the thing we don't know. This is the next level testing. We need to test every lot in every jab to see what the effect is because what we believe now is that people are gonna get. Dr Jack Kruse (33:16.562) certain diseases from different companies and different lots within those companies. So this is the reason why in the United States we see certain lots associated with turbo cancers. This is why we see certain lots associated with clotting. This is why we see certain lots associated with myocarditis. And this is the reason why we see people getting rhabdomyolysis. And we're starting to see another pulse now with people getting really nasty diseases. called prion diseases, those are diseases neurosurgeons deal with, that's diseases like Jakob-Kreutzfeld disease or amyloidosis, okay? And autoimmune conditions. And the autoimmune conditions have really spiked up. We're starting to see a lot of cases of very unusual type one diabetes in people who shouldn't have it. And we're also starting to see some very unusual. cases of neuroendocrine tumors and guts that normally we wouldn't see that are usually associated with people that have bad diabetes over a period of time. And we're also starting to see neurodegeneration happen at very rapid rates, meaning generally when someone gets diagnosed with a dementia, whether it's frontal temporal dysplasia, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, any disease like that usually has a prodrome that takes, you know, a couple of decades to go. These people are getting going from like mild cognitive delay to serious neurodegeneration. Many of the stories that you you hear in Australia, Canada, Europe, where people call it long COVID, it doesn't stay long COVID forever. Certain people get it, certain people don't. Our belief right now has to do with the changes in the lots that are there. So that means we need to start testing every single lot that's out there. Do you think that that kind of issue is gonna happen in the United States where big pharma sits at the Cantillon effect? The answer is no. In fact, here's the real joke of the situation. Big pharma, those medicines haven't even withdrawn from the market here yet. At least, you know, the crown got rid of the AstraZeneca one. There was enough for NHS to say, okay, enough of this shit. Dr Jack Kruse (35:38.672) And Johnson & Johnson in the United States was really smart because they pulled their drug off the market themselves. I think they realized that this is a can of worms that nobody really wants to go through. And Johnson & Johnson has a very different vaccine than everybody else. They used an adenovector virus. They're not polluted with a lot of the same things that Pfizer and Moderna are. But Pfizer's risk right now, in my opinion, off the chain. I really think that while we may not be able to get them by lawfare in the United States, even by some of the things that Bobby Kennedy will probably do in HHS, because of the vaccine law, because of the Dole Buy Act, which you may not know about, but that allowed guys like Fauci to profit off of taxpayer funded research, that's actually the incentive that dictate the outcome why Fauci Stuart Cooke (36:15.822) Hmm. Dr Jack Kruse (36:37.794) you know, was so incentivized to work with gain-of-function people and move it offshore because he made a lot of money. And we now know about a year ago, we found out that he got $440 million in royalties through the NIH and CDC. That money was then redeployed to other scientists that supported his criminality. So you can see that this is a giant conspiracy and we have a law that actually Bobby Kennedy's father was important in writing. It's called the RICO statute. And when Bobby Kennedy Sr. was our attorney general when his brother was president before the government killed him, he's the one that came up with the RICO statute. It turns out, even with this 1986 law that's on the books in the states with the Bayh-Dole Act, there's no protection for these people from a RICO case. So guess what may happen? What may happen? And I think this is where Bobby's going to go in HHS. And this is the reason why I think he's going to have a really tough confirmation process in the United States, even though the Senate is now, you know, weighted to the Republicans. You have to realize in the United States, there's a uniparty problem, meaning the DNC and the RNC has a lot of people that are being paid off by Big Pharma, kind of like what I told you happened in New South Wales. And I'm sure there's many people. and many politicians in Australia, Canada, and Europe, who often has been paid off. We'll find out about this eventually, but that's not my current focus. My current focus really is what can we do to help these people that have been harmed by the vaccine? And that's really my focus, you know, in the future, because I'm the guy that understands the interplay between the nuclear genome and the mitochondrial genome. And that's what decentralized medicine really focuses in on. And you have to realize Stuart that the system that you have in Australia, the system they have in Canada and the system in the UK and in the United States is centralized, meaning that no one will ever get to the point that these people are going to need who've been harmed by this bio weapon. And while I would love to jump into the fray on the medical legal side of things, that's not Uncle Jack's expertise. My expertise is understanding how do we keep Dr Jack Kruse (39:04.098) the genetically modified people in the world, how do we silence that DNA? There's no way we're gonna be able to get it out of our DNA. Like a lot of people are gonna tell you you can detox from it. That is absolute pure insanity. That's the kind of thinking that comes from not understanding truly the science behind it. That's what Kevin McKiernan is really good at explaining. So my goal is to teach people the science that I've been developing over 20 years so we can help people. Now, do I think we're going to come up with new treatments down the road? Yes. So what would I like to maybe end this so you can ask me your next question? It's this is going to be much like the AIDS virus. When AIDS came out, it was a death sentence for everybody who got it. And then magically, slowly over time, We did come up with something called protease inhibitors that actually has now made, you know, AIDS almost a non-issue for most people. But the problem is we had 20 years, 25 years of people dying from it before we came up with the answer. I think that we have a duty as decentralized clinicians to help the people in that 25 year span that's gonna happen between now and then. So that really is my focus. And I think The focus that I brought to the table, at least in the United States, the last 12 months is I went from being apolitical to political. Why? Because I believe this story needs to get out. I believe people like you in Australia, the people in the UK and the people in Canada need to know the truth from the United States because guess what? We made you sick and you bought our bullshit story, hook line and sinker. So I believe that my government has a duty to all of you to tell you the truth. And since my government is not telling you the truth, I'm going to come on podcasts and I'm going to fucking light their house on fire. Stuart Cooke (41:08.482) Boy boy boy. So much to unpack and I think we'll get lots of people scrabbling for the show notes as well to cut and paste names into browsers and to follow this path a little bit further. I just want to share a little bit of a story that happened to me last night in as much as I have had internet problems at home and I'm looking for a new internet service provider and I actually signed up with the same one again but for a faster plan and I had to go through and enter credit card details and give them all of my details. And right at the very end of the conversation with the agent on the phone, she said, I'm gonna send you a link and this link will be for you just to finalise your digital ID. And I said, I'm not sure what you mean. I was expecting to give you my bank. my bank details and my personal details, et cetera. And she said, no, no, you need to take a picture of yourself on your mobile phone. You need to scan some documents, your driver's license, your Medicare number, and that will play a part of your digital ID. And I said, well, no, I'm not very comfortable with that. I don't want to do it. So I think I'll just end. I'll end this. Don't worry about that at all. And she rushed off and went to her manager and came back and said, Well, you don't actually have to give us your digital ID right now. You can go into the store afterwards. And I said, well, I don't want to go into the store afterwards. I'm not very comfortable with me giving you my details and building up a digital profile. I'm not going to do that. Does that mean I won't be able to access the service? And she said, no, no. You will be able to access the service. Perhaps you can do it in the future if you like. So hence, I have my new internet plan, at least I will do at the end of the week. I don't have a digital ID. But that's just an example of a curveball that's thrown out perhaps to me as an unsuspecting and law-abiding citizen as part of the plan that I'm sure will develop into something much bigger down the line. So my question to you is that if we've been following the advice of the government and all the powers that be, and we're guided to what we put in our mouths, which typically will be... Stuart Cooke (43:15.713) a low-fat diet, lots of healthy whole grains. We go out into the sunshine. We're taught in Australia to slip, slap, slop, so hatch, sunscreen, avoid the sun at all costs. And now we seem to be in a little bit of a mess where we are getting sicker, we're getting fatter, children have diabetes, obesity, every autoimmune condition. Dr Jack Kruse (43:38.456) You also have the highest skin cancer rate in the world, just so you know that. No, it's not bizarre to me. It makes total sense to me. It's bizarre to you guys. Turns out the sun doesn't give you cancer. It's all the artificial light around you that does. Stuart Cooke (43:42.357) It's bizarre, isn't it? Stuart Cooke (43:49.72) But what if... Stuart Cooke (43:54.446) Well, I'm a British citizen, so I've lived for 21 years of my life under doom and gloom. So there was no sun. You may get a week in the summer, of which we called our heat wave. But now living in Australia, And I've been in this health and wellness sphere for best part of a decade and a half, doing the complete opposite of what I've been told, in terms of what I'm eating and how I'm exposing myself to the sun. I'm drawn to it like a magnet every day and we get plenty of it. No burns, nothing of any of that sort. I've managed to dodge the medical system for best part of 25 years. I've only been into the doctors to get tests that I've wanted to, bloods and things like that. So my question to you is, It seems almost impossible for Joe Public to be able to even conceptualise doing the right thing because they think they're doing the right thing, because they're following all the roles that we are told that the science and the doctors and the powers that they tell us to do. So where do we go? Dr Jack Kruse (44:58.25) everything they say you do the opposite. If you go and look at my Twitter, what does it say in the little circle? Do not comply. And I got news for you. Every, I famously said this to Rick Rubin and Andrew Uberman on a Tetragrammaton podcast that 99.9 % of things that I learned in medical school and residency are pretty much wrong. And there's a lot of reasons why they're wrong. Stuart Cooke (45:00.279) Yeah. Yeah. Stuart Cooke (45:06.202) Yeah. Stuart Cooke (45:15.673) Hmm. Dr Jack Kruse (45:28.002) But you have to realize that incentives dictate outcomes. The reason why you're told to do many of these things, like I've said this in the United States, I haven't said it too much in Australia, but I'll say it to you. Ask yourself this question, why do Bill Gates, ophthalmologist and dermatologist all want to block the sun? Because it's a great business model for them to be profitable. That's exactly the answer. And it turns out if you are not a dumbass Australian, Stuart Cooke (45:51.416) Yeah. Dr Jack Kruse (45:56.554) and you go out to the bush and you see, you know, the kangaroos running around and you see the birds out there. Notice they don't have sunglasses and sunscreen on, right? They go under a tree. mean, the kangaroos really smart. They actually lick their arms to cool themselves off. But they don't, they don't run away from the sun. And the interesting thing is even when you're under a tree, you still have all the light around you. problem is most people in Australia now they go inside under these fake lights and you don't realize it turns out there's no light controls in any of the dermatologist studies. Like for example, when a dermatologist tells you that UV light causes cancer, you're actually allowed to believe that. You know why? You have a duty that the doctor didn't tell you that the study was done with UV light by itself. Let me ask you this question. Does UV light ever show up from the sun by itself? Or does it have six other colors with it? Turns out it's got six other colors. And you told me you're a British guy, so you know the whole famous story about Newton and the prism, right? He's the guy that created the Pink Floyd album cover so that everybody knows there's seven colors from the sun. Well, it turns out, if you take UV light by itself, yeah, that's a problem. That's what the dermatologists hitched their wagon to. But here's the thing. They didn't tell you that red light is the antidote to purple and to blue. Stuart Cooke (47:08.216) That's right. Dr Jack Kruse (47:22.488) And here's the funny part. Anytime the sun's up, anytime the sun sets, red light's always present. And guess what? It's the most dominant part of the solar spectrum, of terrestrial sunlight. 43 % is infrared A or near infrared light. So when you begin to realize that nature has got the antidote for you and you have a government or a doctor or Bill Gates telling you... No, no, no, we want to geoengineer our skies, want to geoengineer your eyes, and we want to geoengineer your skin. It shouldn't be shocking to you why they're telling you to do it. But I would fully agree with you. When I've been to Australia, I look at them and I think they are the dumbest asses in the world to not figure this out. Why? Because even in the dermatologist's literature that's published in Australia, it shows people that have all the skin cancers have the lowest vitamin D level. If they dermatologists are right, it should be exactly the opposite. People that have the highest vitamin D levels, because you can only make vitamin D from UVB light, right? You know that. They should be the ones that have all the skin cancer. And it turns out every single paper that looks at this shows the lower your vitamin D is, the worse your skin cancer is. How do you like that? So when you think about that and you're wearing sunglasses and slip slather and... Stuart Cooke (48:27.812) Mm-hmm. Stuart Cooke (48:41.262) Yeah. Dr Jack Kruse (48:45.91) all that other bullshit's on the side of your buses. It's no shock to me, actually the reason why you guys have that, but it's also the reason why you were very compliant with the government. Because guess what? What's the part of the story that no one in Australia has heard yet? It's what I talked to Danny Jones about. Turns out when you block the sun, you change the orbital frontal gyrus in your brain, dopamine levels drop, and you become more suggestible. That is a program that started back in the United States, but really started in Nazi Germany called MKUltra. Then MKUltra was graduated to the Stanford Research Institute. Then it was graduated to the Brain Health Initiative. In other words, this is how the bioweapons program in DARPA, part of the DOD that also made the jab, how this all links together. And when you begin to realize that these ideas that you have in Australian medicine actually link to why you guys all rolled up your sleeves and took the visor jab, then you begin to understand why Uncle Jack, know, 20, 25 years ago, everybody thought I was a crazy sob on the internet. I got news to you. It's amazing to me how less crazy I've gotten and how brilliant everybody thinks I am in the last four years because guess what? Just about everything I told people was coming, came and it happened. And right now, Uncle Jack's not just talking to Stuart. Cook on the internet. He's talking to Bukele. He's talking to Nicole Shanahan. He's talking to Bobby Kennedy. And he's talking to Donald Trump. I'm also talking to people in different states about taking this law and putting on the books. Why? Because through the lawfare that's happened with Big Pharma, we've created a big mess in the United States. And as I told you before about going into the Death Star in the Pentagon or Washington, DC, I don't believe that Trump and Bobby are going to be able to fix all the problems. Like, I know that most of you guys in the free world now are hoping that Trump and Bobby can do a lot so that that tsunami wave will come to Australia, come to UK, come to Europe and come to Canada to try to help you. I'm going to be, I'm probably going to be the bearer of bad news to you, my friend. I don't think that's going to happen. And I think Bobby is going to be hamstrung by Dr Jack Kruse (51:14.258) some of the powers that be that are linked to the bankers and Big Pharma. And we probably don't have a long enough podcast for me to explain how all these things link, but I can promise you that Big Pharma was the reason why the First Amendment was destroyed in the United States. Why? Because the money that they were able to use, were, Obama changed the law in the United States. It used to be against the law to actually have Big Pharma ads on TV. He changed that. It's called the month act and it was changed I believe in 2008. Soon as they were able to do that, what did that do? Pharma started paying for all the ads on news media and that means the news media was incentivized to tell the propaganda story of Big Pharma on there. And if they didn't, they would just defund them and not pay him. So it turns out all the news anchors and everybody on those places, they all became shills for Big Pharma. In other words, they were just like the drug dealers on the street for the Colombian drug cartel. That's exactly what happened. And this slowly happened from 2008 to 2024. So now when you put on like Fox News or ABC or NBC in United States, all you see is stuff for this drug, that drug, the other drug, you don't see like, you know, advertisements for kiddie food, because kiddie food can't pay their salaries. Okay. But Big Pharma can. And this is why I don't think you guys, you know, across the pond. Stuart Cooke (52:34.593) You Dr Jack Kruse (52:42.124) really understood how important Elon Musk was for the political process in the United States. Why? Because when he bought Twitter from Jack Dorsey, that actually, remember the first thing he did, he got rid of advertising, right? The advertisers all boycotted him. That was the biggest mistake ever because then Twitter or X, however you want to call it, became truly the town square in the United States. That's where people who were canceled under the previous regime, actually got a voice back. And unfortunately, I've told people this and I don't think you know this and probably the people in Australia do. I was one of the few doctors that weren't canceled on Twitter. Why? Because Jack Dorsey was one of my friends and one of my patients. He followed all of my stiff. Why? Because he was a big technologist. You know that he owned Twitter from the beginning and he got sick from his own tech and he came to me to get better. This is the reason why he lives now in a place with a lot of sun. and he does many of the things that Stuart, you do, and you understand the reason why, but what most of you don't understand in Australia and I think UK and Canada, and this is important for you here, this is gonna be a tough swallow for you. If you go look at the last Jason Bourne movie that was made in 2016, do you know why that Hollywood, the Harvey Weinstein and his friends made that movie? That was a direct threat. to Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg, either you're gonna play ball with us or we're gonna kill you. So guess what? Go look at the storyline. I'm telling you, I knew that. And how can I tell you that I knew? At the Bitcoin Miami event in 2021, Dorsey came to meet with some of my VIPs and told us then that he was gonna sell Twitter. Why? Because at that time he was getting called up in front of Congress all the time and they were talking about section 230 and all this and that. And he said, look, I'm done playing ball with these assholes. you look at just what happened in the United States, did you hear Jack Dorsey say anything about Kamala or Trump? No, he was totally out the mix. He washed his hands of all that. But guess what? Elon Musk knew everything directly from Dorsey. See, many people think Jack's a bad dude. He wasn't a bad dude. Remember, he's 100 % Bitcoin maxi. He's just like what I told you about Boo Kelly in the beginning of this. Dr Jack Kruse (55:07.532) He believes in freedom of money and he realized that Twitter was a bad experiment gone wrong because his board was filled with all those assholes from Silicon Valley that I told you were behind the jab. Those were all the bankers that were tied to this. Like A16Z, these guys are the worst of America. Like we create really amazing products, but you have to realize there's a dystopian side of this side of business. Stuart Cooke (55:20.185) Hmm. Dr Jack Kruse (55:37.66) And this was really why I give Elon a lot of credit, because there's a lot of things about Elon I don't like. I don't like Neuralink. I don't like Starlink. I don't like being controlled from above, because I think DARPA is going to use that technology to do that to all of us eventually. They just haven't got to that point in the game yet. But what Elon did is he gave Americans that had different ideas the opportunity to speak. And I can tell you that's the reason why the election went the way it went. I got news for you guys in Australia think that this was a landslide. I think it was even bigger than that. Why? Because we know that the Democrats did a ton of cheating and even with their cheating they couldn't overcome this because guess what? Americans are truly fed up with what went on. Like you guys think you're a little bit mad? Dude, you have no idea how pissed off. people are here because we understand the scale. And most people are waking up to the stuff that I shared with you here about SV40 and the DNA plasmids and the 60 billion per shot. Dude, that's not even why Trump really won. He won because of all the shit with inflation, the open borders, and the global socialism that the people who are behind the jab, the people in the Department of Defense, they're all in cahoots with each other. That's the stuff that you're dealing with right now with the world economic forum and the people that are in charge in Australia. All of these people got their marching orders from King Charles. Remember, King Charles has been, when he was the prince, he was up Klaus Schwab's ass from almost 50 years ago. And who was their best friend in the United States? Henry Kissinger. He's another guy that's tied to the Council of Foreign Relations. How far does this go back? mean, look, you're a UK guy. You remember the whole story about the Pilgrim Society and the Rhodes Scholars. This all was stuff that came out after Queen Victoria died and the new monarch came in, which was King George, who was Queen Elizabeth's grandfather. His brother, you know this story very well. His brother, Edward VIII, abdicated because everybody wanted to talk about Wallace Simpson. No, he abdicated because the royal family Dr Jack Kruse (58:02.156) was part of propping up Hitler with their bankers, the Rothschilds. And we now know that. It's very obvious. And that's the reason why the king really had to step down. It got so bad in World War I that the king had to change their name from Saxe, Coburn, Gotha to Windsor. They took it off a castle. Wasn't even, you know, didn't even think about it good. And why did they do that? They had to do that because one of the guys from Russia, who took over their land, shot and killed the Romanovs, which was the cousin of the king in England, also the cousin of Wilhelm in Germany. Well, they didn't plan on that. They didn't plan on killing him. But we now know that the Rothschild bankers at the time were the ones with the king that wanted the Romanovs put in jail in Siberia. Why? Because people always forget this. This Bolshevik revolution happens in the middle of World War I. It's the craziest thing ever that you can have a revolution in a royal family and they were worried. But it turned out one of the guys of the three in Russia, that's Trotsky. Trotsky is the one that made the decision to kill the Romanovs. Guess what? Lenin and Stalin didn't want that to happen. They knew that that was going to create a huge problem down the road. When you think about this as a Briton now, now I'm talking to you as a Brit and not as an Australian. Remember what the British Empire is all about. They're all about that imperialism and you are part of the Commonwealth. Well, in one stroke, you lost Russia. You lost the United States in 1774. So what was really World War II all about? It was about setting up a bad deal for the Germans in the Treaty of Versailles so you can guarantee a second world war. That's really what happens. Why? Because the king wanted to bring the United States and Russia back into a war so they could regain a loyal title. And let me just tell you something. There's one thing you're going to learn about the royal family from this midfit who came from you in England, is that the royal family and their bankers Dr Jack Kruse (01:00:23.82) have screwed up the 20th and 21st century more than you can ever imagine. Most of the things that we're all dealing with now are because they want to recapture the lands that they lost and bring them back under British rule. And it turns out the one thing they've done, they've infiltrated a lot of the United States government with people who are still loyal. That's what the Council of Foreign Relations is. And who is the main group in the United States that the Royal Family and the Rothschilds partner with. It's the Rockefellers. Rockefellers were richer than the Rothschilds and the Royal Family. So guess what? They brought them in. And then, magically, we got the Council of Foreign Relations. They're tied to Tavistock. They're tied to the Committee of 300. You got this whole story. And then, magically, we get the Federal Reserve, which is basically all of the families that were in Europe, now the big ones in the United States, who are also all ex-Britain. Now they're all in bed together and go, hey, let's start this process in the United States to see if we can get back to the Middle Ages where everybody's on a feudal plantation and they're working for us and they're happy about it. That's just the marketing slogan that changed from the 1920s to 1973 and 71 when Kissinger and Schwab start the world economic forum. The process for the last 50 years, slow incremental changes to get us back. to the one world government idea. That's all the stuff that we're talking about, all the health stuff, all the COVID stuff. That is the true metastatic cancer that sits at the base of this shit sandwich. Stuart Cooke (01:02:13.032) I think you're like the modern day magnum PI on steroids. What is it we don't know? Dr Jack Kruse (01:02:18.956) Well, just think, well, Stuart, this is what I will say to you, and hopefully this resonates with you and resonates with the audience. There's two type of people in the world, those that believe the government and then those that know the history. And it turns out when you know the history, you have to have one caveat. The victors write the history books, but it turns out the real history is still discoverable if you know what rocks to look under. And when Stuart Cooke (01:02:46.328) Yeah. Dr Jack Kruse (01:02:48.286) I started this whole process because people have asked me, how did you figure a lot of this stuff out? Well, it turned out my mentor in this whole thing, which is Robert O. Becker, who's a doctor in the United States who was canceled by the Industrial Military Complex over the effect of non-native EMF. Turned out when I saw how he was canceled, it was tied to the same story. And when he got canceled in 1977, I met with him in 2007. He had 30 years to figure out who really did him wrong. And let me tell you something, if you think Uncle Jack is salty, you should have met this cat. He was truly pissed off. This guy was twice nominated for the Nobel Prize. So when I sat down with him and we shared notes, he casually warned me. He said, don't do anything crazy like I did and go on 60 minutes and try to tell the world the truth. because the world will never believe the truth because they're in a propaganda of lies. And those lies were set up by the architects that I just told you about, the bankers, Big Pharma, all the corporations, all the people that BlackRock own in the United States, those are all the people that you guys are affected by too. BlackRock affects Australia, UK, everybody else. And the idea of BlackRock... is you only have to have 5 % ownership in a company. Everybody else has fractional ownership. So effectively, this is the same idea that the Rothschilds used in 1812 at the Battle of Waterloo when they took over the banking situation. You they had better information than anything else. You don't have to own a company 100 % or 51 % to control it. If you control the finances, you control the country. And that's actually what Thomas Jefferson warned. are people about in 1774. This is the reason why Thomas Jefferson was absolutely adamant that the Bank of England was filled with a bunch of criminals. And he was right. I mean, I hate to tell you this, but this problem has now persisted on for 250 years in United States. And I would love to tell you that we were smarter than the Britons, but we weren't. We use their system. And now the system is so broken. Dr Jack Kruse (01:05:09.622) and it's so slated to them, they're going, they think we're complete idiots. So they're trying to, you know, completely go back to the way it used to be. And that makes King Charles very happy. Makes the Rothschilds happy, makes the Rockefellers happy. Why? Because they're able to recapture everything. If they can get the United States, they believe they can eventually get Russia back. That should make you realize truly what's going on with NATO, the Ukraine and Putin right now. It completely gives you a different spin on things when you look at what's happened in European, you know, world history here lately. And I just want to be the guy to tell you that I think if you focus on the history here, you'll understand more of the biology and why decentralized medicine is really important for you to follow from this point forward. Like the story that you told me about the digital ID. I really appreciate it because it definitely ties into the story. I think every resident of the UK, every resident of Australia needs to follow your model. think what you said and that you weren't going to comply with this level of intrusion and surveillance is absolutely it. mean, look, we got a guy in the United States right now, Edward Snowden, who warned us about this and he's sitting in in Russia being protected. If you don't think that this story resonates with people in the United States, you're crazy. And look, you guys have a guy that just got out of jail for WikiLeaks. And you forget what WikiLeaks was about. It was about turning all the state's evidence through WikiLeaks of all these connections that I'm telling you about now. And the crazy thing is they treated D platform, right? Through the bank. They got rid of his bank accounts through the Bank of England and all the banks in Australia. Stuart Cooke (01:06:37.123) Yeah. Stuart Cooke (01:07:03.097) Hmm. Dr Jack Kruse (01:07:06.808) So what did he do to continue to do it? He used Bitcoin. Bitcoin actually allowed us to realize that John Podesta, the Clintons, Jeffrey Epstein, all these people were all linked together. This is how a lot of this story started to come out, Stuart, so that the regular folk on the people in Main Street could start talking about it on Twitter. That people like Matt Taibbi, you know, dropped the Twitter files and everybody in the world was like, holy shit, Snowden was right. You know. Julian Assange was right. Like this is no more, this is not a mystery Stuart. You know what the mystery is? Is that people all over the world are too busy watching Netflix, rugby games, soccer games, and doing Circus Maximus. It's the same story that we were told in Plato's Allegory of the Cave, that even when the slave is shown the truth, they're like, I'm gonna go back in the cave, just put my cuffs back on and I'm good. Most of you probably won't like to hear, Stuart Cooke (01:08:02.956) Yeah Dr Jack Kruse (01:08:06.038) of just how much disdain I have for you. But that's the truth. I told the people the same thing in the United States before the election. I said, if you vote for Kamala Harris, you are the slave that's going back in the cave. And I'm not telling you that Trump's any prize package, but he's got less warts than the other person. And I think it's going to take a while for us to really get rid of this metastatic cancer. Organ by organ, we have to change it. But I'm hoping by doing a podcast like this with you, Stuart Cooke (01:08:17.401) Hmm. Stuart Cooke (01:08:23.501) Yeah. Dr Jack Kruse (01:08:36.29) that you can really understand how decentralized finance and decentralized health are linked together. This story is just like the medical caduceus that you look at. The two snakes are intertwined. And it's our job as the patient not to comply with fiat money, with bullshit CBDCs, when any kind of things are controlled, whether it's the internet company or your bank. Take all your money out of the bank. Don't leave it in the bank. And I would tell everybody, I think

Was WWIII effectively started with the recent permission given to Ukraine to use long-range missiles to strike deep into Russian territory?  Will Russia wait to see the first missile flying or preemptively strike the west?  Do we have a global government in our near future?  Complete with a war on Christianity (in all forms)?  Will we see an inauguration in January?  What have the leaders of NATO, the US, the G-20, and Russia all done within the past 48 hours?  Is Ukraine to be the next "Greater Israel"?  I encourage all to fast on a schedule in order to spiritually prepare for our future - the final showdown between good and evil before the truly Triumphal Entry of our Redeemer. SYN OF SATAN What the people of Rev. 3:9 want (hence, the Ukraine war?): https://x.com/HenryMakow/status/1772299206977331334?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Escreen-name%3AHenryMakow%7Ctwcon%5Es1 Trump inherits a really bad economy: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/they-just-got-handed-fraudulent-books-ed-dowd-warns-trump-inheriting-turd-economy Yup, political Zionism appears to be America's future: https://www.brighteon.com/cbcd95a6-f682-4f25-95e5-2633a5399c41 Trump's cabinet: https://open.substack.com/pub/gregreese/p/the-zionist-occupied-government-of?r=12g59e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Trump's cabinet #2: https://open.substack.com/pub/2ndsmartestguyintheworld/p/trump-team-overview?r=12g59e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email President has power to control FDA – will he?: https://open.substack.com/pub/karenkingston/p/fda-commissioner-drops-bombshell?r=12g59e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email Re-post: is Ukraine war all about clearing out Slavs to re-install Khazars?: https://x.com/HenryMakow/status/1772299206977331334?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Escreen-name%3AHenryMakow%7Ctwcon%5Es1 Clearing out Ukraine of Ukrainians?: https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/from-august-6-to-november-11-222-395-ukraine-troops-killed-or-wounded Novus Ordo Seclorum?: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/elon-musk-posts-novus-ordo-seclorum-alongside-image-of-him-with-trump/ Times of Israel 2014 article re those calling themselves Ashkenazi Jews returning to Ukraine (Notice of “The blog post is a work of satire” was added only when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 [as I recall]) : https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/ Brief history of Khazarians (for clarification, Talmud is called Torah): https://geopolitics.co/2017/09/08/khazarians-then-khazarians-now/ History of Khazarians (I could only open this in Yandex.com): https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2015/03/08/the-hidden-history-of-the-incredibly-evil-khazarian-mafia/ Trump's cabinet thus far: https://t.me/gregreesevideoreports/539 Does bill by incoming Homeland Sec. Head, Kristi Noem, violate 1srt amendment?: https://needtoknow.news/2024/03/south-dakota-gov-kristi-noem-signs-hate-crime-bill-to-stop-antiemitism-violating-free-speech/ VAXX Dr. Naomi Wolf's team of 2500, “Centerpiece of Cvaxx is reproductive centers of body.”; https://t.me/NaomiWolfDr/8504 Woke physician withholds results of $10 million research grant when study of puberty blockers to children-study fails to yield ANY POSITIVE results (most likely a host of negative results): https://t.me/NaomiWolfDr/8500 Horrifying design of C19 vaxx to completely deregulate one's immune system (not designed by human hand?): https://open.substack.com/pub/2ndsmartestguyintheworld/p/update-2-turbo-vaids-the-end-decentralized?r=12g59e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email C19 vaxx leads to increased dementia, 20% increase in huge Japanese study of 600,000 people, mild cognitive impairment increased 2.4 times: https://www.aussie17.com/p/japanese-neuroscientist-dr-hiroto C19 prion disease might be contagious: https://www.

Публикуется четвертая передача с обсуждением Постановления Пленума Верховного Суда РФ от 25.06.2024 N 19 "О применении судами законодательства о добровольном страховании имущества". Подкаст передачи доступен в: iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/ru/podcast... Yandex https://music.yandex.ru/album/11010340 Персональный сайт: antonivanov.ru Блог: https://zakon.ru/ivanov.pravo VK: https://vk.com/ivanov.pravo Livejournal: https://ivanov-pravo.livejournal.com

⁠Никита Андриянов⁠ — кандидат технических наук, доцент кафедры искусственного интеллекта Финансового университета при Правительстве Российской Федерации. Он родился в городе Ленина — Ульяновске, а теперь путешествует по миру и участвует в конференциях по искусственному интеллекту. В 2013 году окончил ульяновский Политех, получив степень магистра, а в 2017 — защитил кандидатскую. Никита является автором трех учебных пособий по тематике обработки сигналов и машинного обучения. Успел поработать в двух региональных вузах, в филиале одного из них в Подмосковье, а теперь работает в Финашке и ИТМО. В настоящее время активно занимается обработкой изображений, является большим фанатом тенниса, публикует свои произведения на Прозе.ру и переводит популярные песни зарубежных исполнителей на своей странице ВКонтакте. Часто ездит на выездные игры ФК «Волга» (Ульяновск), а его отзывы из путешествий на Яндексе набирают тысячи просмотров. Nikita Andriyanov is a PhD in Engineering and an Associate Professor in the Department of Artificial Intelligence at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. He was born in the city of Lenin — Ulyanovsk, but now travels the world, participating in artificial intelligence conferences. In 2013, he graduated from the Ulyanovsk Polytechnic with a master's degree, and in 2017, he defended his PhD thesis. Nikita is the author of three textbooks on signal processing and machine learning. He has worked at two regional universities, including a branch of one in the Moscow region, and now works at the Financial University and ITMO University. Currently, he is actively involved in image processing, is a big fan of tennis, publishes his writings on Proza.ru, and translates popular songs by international artists on his VK page. He frequently attends away games of FC Volga Ulyanovsk, and his travel reviews on Yandex receive thousands of views. FIND NIKITA ON SOCIAL MEDIA ⁠VKontakte⁠ | ⁠Telegram⁠ ==================================SUPPORT & CONNECT:Support on Patreon: ⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/denofrich⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠https://twitter.com/denofrich⁠⁠Facebook: ⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/mark.develman/⁠⁠YouTube: ⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/denofrich⁠⁠Instagram: ⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/den_of_rich/⁠⁠Hashtag: #denofrichType of unconscious: 10© Copyright 2024 Den of Rich. All rights reserved.

I am thrilled to have Natalia Cebotari, the co-founder of Osmos building the first networking platform for entrepreneurs and professionals that saves time and finds relevant people in less than a minute. In this episode, Natalia Cebotari, founder of Osmos, talks about the networking platform designed to save time and connect professionals quickly. Natalia shares her journey, from working alongside her husband on their first startup to becoming Chief Strategy Officer at Yandex, where she built new ventures within the corporation. She discusses the challenges of building a social platform, the growth of Osmos, the importance of conversations in expanding one's network, and much more!Subscribe on SpotifySubscribe on YouTubeSubscribe on iTunesLearn* What are the key metrics Natalia focuses on to measure the success of Osmos?* What strategies have been most effective in growing the user base of Osmos?* Will companies actually make more revenue from having AI in products* What is your favorite business book? –Lean Analytics* What is your favorite online tool? –iPhone notes* If you could go back to when you started working, what is the one thing you would have focused on? – Talk to customersTimestamps* 03:30 – Learning to navigate challenges and becoming resilient in entrepreneurship.* 05:00 – Natalia's transition to working at Yandex as Chief Strategy Officer.* 06:30 – Building new ventures inside Yandex and the differences from a small startup.* 08:15 – The importance of collaboration and communication in large companies like Yandex.* 11:00 – The vision behind Osmos and Natalia's motivation to create an alternative to LinkedIn.* 13:00 – Challenges entrepreneurs face with loneliness and isolation.* 14:30 – How conversations with new people can bring fresh energy and ideas.* 16:00 – Natalia discusses how Osmos grew its initial user base through networking.* 17:30 – The effectiveness of attending online conferences for user acquisition.* 19:00 – The role of email integration in Osmos' growth strategy.* 23:00 – The importance of tracking the number of conversations and user satisfaction.* 26:00 – How paid users behave differently and take conversations more seriously.* 28:00 – Insights on product development from feedback received from paid users.* 30:00 – Balancing user growth with maintaining a high-quality user experience.* 32:00 – Natalia's perspective on growth as an art, not just a science.* 33:30 – The right time to hire a growth teamNatalia's Links LDN– https://www.linkedin.com/in/nataliechebotarWebsite – https://osmos.socialMy Links Podcast: https://lifeselfmastery.com/itunesYouTube:  youtube.com/lifeselfmasteryTwitter: https://twitter.com/rohitmal5-day email course: www.enterprisesalesexpertise.comNewsletter:  This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit partnergrow.substack.com

Heute geht es in Anknüpfung an Folge #151 “Wie Google den Displaymarkt dominiert” einmal mehr um den Missbrauch der marktbeherrschenden Stellung des Tech-Giganten und der damit einhergehenden Wettbewerbsverzerrung zu Lasten von Medien, Publishern und Advertisern. Und es geht um Strafen in Milliardenhöhen. Was ist in den letzten Monaten im Bereich AdTech passiert? Wie sieht die juristische Seite dazu aus? Ich habe mir als Gesprächspartner zu diesem höchst spannenden und zukunftsträchtigen Thema erneut die beiden Mega-Experten auf diesem Gebiet eingeladen: Philipp (Pip) Klöckner und Prof. Dr. Thomas Höppner, Rechtsanwalt und Partner von Hausfeld. Unsere Diskussion gibt euch ein detailliertes Update u.a. zu folgenden Fragestellungen: - Wettbewerbsschädigung durch Google: Was ist in den letzten Monaten passiert? - Welche Bewegungen gab es zuletzt auf der juristischen Seite in Bezug auf Verfahren, Prozesse und Urteile in den US und der EU? - DOJ Case: Googles Beziehung zu Apple - braucht es hier strukturelle Änderungen und welche? - Booking.com: Welche Wechselwirkung hat das jüngste EuGH-Urteil für Amazon? - Werden die Milliardenstrafen die Plattformen zum Ändern ihrer Geschäftspraktiken bewegen? - Wird AI die AdTech-Krise ggf. noch weiter verschärfen? - Wie können Werbungtreibende auf diese Entwicklung Einfluss nehmen? Philipp (Pip) Klöckner war Produktmanager, Inhouse SEO und leitete das Marketing beim marktführenden Preisvergleich in Deutschland (Idealo.de). Er ist spezialisiert auf die Bereiche Accessibility, Crawlability und Onpage-Optimierung von Websites mit umfangreichem Inventar in wettbewerbsintensiven Branchen (eCommerce, Vergleichssuchmaschinen, Marktplätze, Kleinanzeigen & Reisen). Seit 2011 konzentriert sich Philipp Klöckner auf Search-Beratung und organische Wachstumsstrategien, um seine Erfahrungen in den Bereichen Search (Google, Bing, Yandex, SEO / PPC), Comparison Shopping und Business Intelligence als unabhängiger Berater und Angel-Investor mit Verlagen, E-Commerce-Unternehmen und Start-ups zu teilen. Prof. Dr. Thomas Höppner ist Rechtsanwalt und Partner von Hausfeld mit Schwerpunkt im europäischen und deutschen Kartellrecht und Immaterialgüterrecht. Seine Tätigkeit umfasst das gesamte Spektrum des Marktordnungsrechts, einschließlich der sektorspezifischen Regulierung.Thomas hat erfolgreich Kartellrechtsbeschwerden vor der Europäischen Kommission und nationalen Gerichten geführt und vertritt Geschädigte vor deutschen Gerichten, insbesondere im Zusammenhang mit dem Missbrauch von Marktmacht und Schadensersatzansprüchen. Besondere Erfahrung hat Thomas in Technologie-, Medien- und Netzwerkmärkten, wo er Mandanten regelmäßig in komplexen Verfahren an der Schnittstelle von Wettbewerb, Regulierung, Geistigem Eigentum und Datenschutz berät. Angesprochene Empfehlungen von Philipp und Thomas zum Thema AI Foundation Models Technical update report Thomas Höppner LinkedIN Produziert von TLDR Studios

 - Việt Nam, với cảnh quan tuyệt đẹp, nền văn hóa phong phú và giá cả phải chăng, đã trở thành ngôi sao đang lên tại châu Á trong xu hướng du lịch toàn cầu. Đó là nhận định của tập đoàn công nghệ tìm kiếm quốc tế lớn nhất thế giới Yandex. Chủ đề : du lịch, Việt Nam - Nga, Yandex --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/vov1tintuc/support

I am thrilled to have Asya Kuznetsova, a product and growth expert who has led the product growth unit at Wise, a global FinTech company that processes more than £8B worth of international transactions for over 16M people and businesses.In this episode, Asya Kuznetsova, a product and growth expert with experience at Wise and Yandex discusses building products that are ten times better than competitors, optimizing growth through referrals, and the differences between B2C and B2B scaling. She also highlights data-driven decision-making long-term growth strategies, and much more!Subscribe on SpotifySubscribe on YouTubeSubscribe on iTunesLearn* What are the most effective metrics to measure the success of organic growth initiatives?* How to structure and optimize referral programs to maximize their impact on user acquisition?* What are the biggest mistakes founders make when scaling into an enterprise?* What is your favourite business book? – Cold start problem* What is your favourite online tool? –Figma* If you could go back to when you started working, what is the one thing you would have focused on? – Build 10x better productTimestamps06:30 - Yandex Lessons08:45 - 10x Approach11:30 - Fail Fast, Learn Fast13:45 - B2C vs B2B15:00 - Customer-Centric Approach17:10 - Metrics for Growth19:00 - Word of Mouth Growth22:30 - Referral Programs25:10 - Customer Delight27:00 - Product-Led Growth30:00 - Localization33:00 - Managing Scale and Quality35:10 - Data-Driven Growth39:45 - Enterprise Scaling42:30 - Building for EnterprisesAsya's Links LDN– https://www.linkedin.com/in/asya-kuznetsova/Website – wise.comMy Links Podcast: https://lifeselfmastery.com/itunes YouTube:  youtube.com/lifeselfmastery Twitter: https://twitter.com/rohitmal 5-day email course: www.enterprisesalesexpertise.com Newsletter:  This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit partnergrow.substack.com

Илья Левинсон — исполнительный директор коммуникационного агентства "Монстарс". Опыт работы в коммуникациях — более 7 лет. Разрабатывал коммуникационные интегрированные кампании для банка "Точка", "Авито", "Яндекса", "Бургер Кинг", "PicsArt", "Skillbox", "Gett", "Норникеля", "Цифровой платформы МСП" и других крупных компаний. Ранее занимал должность креативного директора в VINCI Agency. Ilya Levinson is the CEO of the communications agency Monstars. He has over 7 years of experience in communications. He has developed integrated communication campaigns for companies such as Tochka Bank, Avito, Yandex, Burger King, PicsArt, Skillbox, Gett, Norilsk Nickel, the SME Digital Platform, and other major corporations. Previously, he held the position of Creative Director at VINCI Agency. FIND ILYA ON SOCIAL MEDIA Instagram | Facebook ================================SUPPORT & CONNECT:Support on Patreon: ⁠https://www.patreon.com/denofrich⁠Twitter: ⁠https://twitter.com/denofrich⁠Facebook: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/mark.develman/⁠YouTube: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/denofrich⁠Instagram: ⁠https://www.instagram.com/den_of_rich/⁠Hashtag: #denofrichType of unconscious: 14© Copyright 2024 Den of Rich. All rights reserved.

Это лекция №25 из курса Гражданского права (общей части). Тема лекции: Личные неимущественные блага и права на них. Отдельные виды благ, регулирующиеся кодексом Подкаст передачи доступен в: iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/ru/podcast... Yandex https://music.yandex.ru/album/1101034... Персональный сайт: http://antonivanov.ru Блог: https://zakon.ru/ivanov.pravo VK: https://vk.com/ivanov.pravo Livejournal: https://ivanov-pravo.livejournal.com

Это лекция №26 из курса Гражданского права (общей части). Тема лекции: Сделки: понятие и виды (часть 1) Подкаст передачи доступен в: iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/ru/podcast... Yandex https://music.yandex.ru/album/1101034... Персональный сайт: http://antonivanov.ru Блог: https://zakon.ru/ivanov.pravo VK: https://vk.com/ivanov.pravo Livejournal: https://ivanov-pravo.livejournal.com

В этом выпуске у меня в гостях Алекс Шубин, директор по продукту в DocuSign, и мы говорим поиске работы на руководящие должности в США. Мы обсудили особенности резюме и LinkedIn-профиля для менеджеров, процесс собеседований, включая поведенческие вопросы, важность культурного соответствия компании и тактику ведения переговоров по зарплате. Алекс делится ценными инсайтами о том, как успешно пройти через процесс найма на высокие позиции, подчеркивая важность аутентичности, понимания своих сильных сторон и умения эффективно их презентовать потенциальному работодателю. Алекс Шубин (Alex Shubin), Director of Product Management at DocuSign (ex Dropbox, Adobe, Zillow, Yandex), выпускник Berkley, California. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-shubin/ *** Записывайтесь на карьерную консультацию (резюме, LinkedIn, карьерная стратегия, поиск работы в США): https://annanaumova.com Онлайн курс "Идеальное резюме и поиск работы в США": https://go.mbastrategy.com/resumecoursemain Гайд "Идеальное американское резюме": https://go.mbastrategy.com/usresume Гайд "Как оформить профиль в LinkedIn, чтобы рекрутеры не смогли пройти мимо" (предзаказ): https://link.coursecreator360.com/widget/form/ObfVCQ2clIWTdNcQBAkf Мой Telegram-канал: https://t.me/prodcastUSA Мой Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/prodcast.us/

On today's episode of Equity, Rebecca Bellan did a deep dive into the CrowdStrike outage that affected around 8.5 million Windows devices around the world, causing disruptions in air travel, banking, hospitals, media outlets, federal agencies and businesses of all kinds. The outage began when CrowdStrike, a cloud security giant, sent out a defective software update. While CrowdStrike quickly identified the issue and deployed a fix, the fallout continued over the weekend and will probably continue into this week, particularly for the travel sector. United, American and Delta airlines all collectively saw thousands of flights canceled and delayed, which will have ripple effects into the week. Rebecca went into how this outage – despite not being a cyberattack – has provided the world with a stark example of just how vulnerable our critical infrastructure systems are, a big problem if our adversaries decide to get any bright ideas. She also discussed the reputational damage CrowdStrike experienced, the startups that have smelled blood in the water and are poised to strike, and the potential need to regulate monopolies that offer essential services. Moving on, Rebecca took a look at what U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris's stance on technology has been, now that President Joe Biden has stepped out of the race for the presidency and officially endorsed his right hand. Harris appears to favor oversight for big tech companies to protect consumer privacy, as well as AI regulation to stop companies from prioritizing profits over people and society. While some big names in the VC and tech world have backed former President Donald Trump due to his laissez-faire approach to regulating AI and crypto (something we talked about on last week's Friday episode!), others in the industry have shown support for Harris. VCs like John Doerr and Ron Conway were among her early supporters, and as a presidential candidate, Harris was quickly endorsed by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman. Rebecca also looked at a Reuters report detailing Nvidia's plans to build a version of its new flagship AI chips for the Chinese market that are compatible with current U.S. export controls. The U.S. tightened controls of exports of semiconductors to China in 2023, a move designed to limit the Chinese military's breakthroughs in supercomputing, but it appears Nvidia isn't so keen to let that market go. Finally, Rebecca took a look at a deep dive from TechCrunch's Paul Sawers on Yandex, once referred to as the “Google of Russia” and its comeback from Nasdaq limbo. Yandex's publicly traded Dutch entity has severed all ties with Russia, selling off the entirety of its Russian assets in a fire sale earlier this year. The “new” company has adopted the name of one of its few remaining assets, a Finnish data center and AI cloud platform called Nebuis AI. The company is now operating as something of a corporation-startup hybrid. Its goal? To be a European AI compute leader. Equity will be back on Wednesday to interview Maven Ventures's Sara Deshpande about why the VC is bullish on consumer funding and how venture is looking at AI companies, so tune back in then! Equity is TechCrunch's flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and posts every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod. For the full episode transcript, for those who prefer reading over listening, check out our full archive of episodes over at Simplecast. Credits: Equity is produced by Theresa Loconsolo with editing by Kell. Bryce Durbin is our Illustrator. We'd also like to thank the audience development team and Henry Pickavet, who manages TechCrunch audio products.

Chip stocks dipped yesterday after Trump's comments rattled investors, the EU spoke up against Viktor Orbán's recent travels, and a bid to force Amazon to recognise a union failed in the UK. Plus, the FT's Madhumita Murgia explains what Yandex's move into Europe signifies. Mentioned in this podcast:Chip stocks tumble as Trump comments rattle investors Donald Trump has ‘well-founded plans' for Russia-Ukraine peace talks, Viktor Orbán claims Amazon beats back union bid for UK recognition Yandex founder to build AI business in Europe after Russia exit The FT News Briefing is produced by Fiona Symon, Sonja Hutson, Kasia Broussalian and Marc Filippino. Additional help from Breen Turner, Sam Giovinco, Peter Barber, Michael Lello, David da Silva and Gavin Kallmann. Our engineer is Monica Lopez. Our intern is Prakriti Panwar. Topher Forhecz is the FT's executive producer. The FT's global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. The show's theme song is by Metaphor Music.Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Mardi 16 juillet, François Sorel a reçu Philippe Dewost, fondateur de Phileos, ancien directeur général de l'EPITA, cofondateur de Wanadoo, Marjorie Paillon, journaliste, Frédéric Simottel, journaliste BFM Business et Bruno Guglielminetti, journaliste et animateur de « Mon Carnet de l'actualité numérique ». Ils sont revenus sur l'ex-président Donald Trump qui choisit J. D. Vance, un ancien de la Silicon Valley, comme vice-président dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.

Mardi 16 juillet, François Sorel a reçu Philippe Dewost, fondateur de Phileos, ancien directeur général de l'EPITA, cofondateur de Wanadoo, Marjorie Paillon, journaliste, Frédéric Simottel, journaliste BFM Business, et Bruno Guglielminetti, journaliste et animateur de « Mon Carnet de l'actualité numérique ». Ils sont revenus sur la rupture des liens entre Yandex et la Russie, le projet secret d'OpenAI de créer une IA supérieure à l'humain, dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.

Hey Webflailers!I'm your host, Jack, your failure connoisseur, and today my guest is Isabelle Cuisset.Fascinatingly, her background is in merchandising.She has an extensive background in the fashion industry, working with major luxury brands such as Burberry, Loewe, and Prada for over two decades.Moving towards the digital world, she graduated from a ten-month Web Development Bootcamp at TripleTen (ex Practicum by Yandex) in 2021. Driven by her passion, she decided to launch her own web design and development studio.3 days a week, she's still in the fashion world and 2 days a week as a Webflower.The failures we'll talk about in today's episode are:Failing to realise what you see is not always what you get!Failing to get content from clients before starting a projectFailing to learn something new every dayBONSAIStreamline your client process - check out Bonsai here!WEBFLAIL FREEBIESCheck out free Webflail resources here!Webflow 2024 Planner10 Step Process To Land Your First Webflow Clients: The Ultimate GuideMENTIONED IN THIS EPISODEBrowserstackGoogle LighthouseOptibaseLINKS FOR ISABELLE‍

My guest today is Ilya Strebulaev, a Russian-American financial economist, researcher, author, and speaker with expertise in venture capital, startups, and corporate innovation. He has been a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business since 2004. From 2018 to 2022 he was on the board of directors of Yandex, the Russian equivalent of Google. Ilya co-developed a framework that asses the value of private venture capital (VC) backed companies. His research also includes studies on the decision-making of startup investors, the organization and design of VC and corporate VC units, and the importance of venture capital in innovation and the economy. The topic is his co-authored book The Venture Mindset: How to Make Smarter Bets and Achieve Extraordinary Growth. In this episode of Trend Following Radio we discuss: Venture capital Risk and uncertainty Decision making Home runs vs. strikeouts Counterintuitive principles Applying venture mindset on business Cultural differences on the venture mindset Jump in! --- I'm MICHAEL COVEL, the host of TREND FOLLOWING RADIO, and I'm proud to have delivered 10+ million podcast listens since 2012. Investments, economics, psychology, politics, decision-making, human behavior, entrepreneurship and trend following are all passionately explored and debated on my show. To start? I'd like to give you a great piece of advice you can use in your life and trading journey… cut your losses! You will find much more about that philosophy here: https://www.trendfollowing.com/trend/ You can watch a free video here: https://www.trendfollowing.com/video/ Can't get enough of this episode? You can choose from my thousand plus episodes here: https://www.trendfollowing.com/podcast My social media platforms: Twitter: @covel Facebook: @trendfollowing LinkedIn: @covel Instagram: @mikecovel Hope you enjoy my never-ending podcast conversation!

Après un scrutin présidentiel dont l'issue n'a jamais fait de doute, Vladimir Poutine va être officiellement investi pour un cinquième mandat ce mardi 7 mai. Chef de l'État russe et chef de guerre, il aura notamment sur sa table le dossier des régions frontalières visées par des frappes de drones et missiles ukrainiens, ainsi que des incursions armées. Exemple à Belgorod, où les civils vivent dans une peur qui s'est installée dans chaque instant de leur vie quotidienne.  De notre envoyée spéciale à Belgorod, 10h30 à Belgorod, encore une alarme anti-aérienne. Les voitures pilent, leurs portes claquent. Passager ou conducteur, chacun pique un sprint vers l'abri le plus proche. Des mois qu'ici on connaît la consigne par cœur : après les premières sirènes, chacun ne dispose que de 30 secondes maximum pour rejoindre un de ces nombreux espaces en béton blanc de quelques mètres carrés qui ont poussé comme des champignons partout dans la ville. Trente secondes, soit le délai avant l'impact potentiel d'un missile ou d'un drone qui ne pourrait pas être abattu par la défense anti-aérienne.Dans Belgorod, le maillage d'abris est dense, jusqu'à tous les dix mètres dans les zones les plus fréquentées. Pendant que les sirènes continuent à hurler, on se presse et on se pousse dans un de ces espaces bétonnés de protection : « Laissez passer ma petite fille, laissez-la passer tout au fond », dit un père de famille. Juste à côté, une grand-mère peste : « Mais plus vite enfin... Et regardez-moi celui-là, là-bas, qui arrive sans se presser ».La ville est visée depuis un an, mais il y a dans Belgorod un avant et un après 30 décembre 2023, le jour où une frappe, attribuée immédiatement par la Russie à l'Ukraine, a causé la mort de 25 personnes, adultes et enfants, et blessé plus d'une centaine d'autres. Ce bilan très lourd est aujourd'hui dans toutes les têtes.Des alertes anti-aériennes jour et nuitDevant l'entrée d'un centre commercial protégé par des blocs de béton, une grand-mère raconte : « Le 30 décembre, je m'apprêtais à partir avec mes petits-enfants admirer l'arbre de Noël qu'ils n'avaient pas encore vu sur la Grand-Place et faire du patin à glace. Dieu merci, on était en retard et nous n'étions pas dehors quand les tirs ont commencé. On a entendu l'alerte, on n'est allés nulle part. »À cette évocation, les larmes lui montent immédiatement aux yeux, peut-être aussi parce que comme beaucoup dans la ville, elle est à fleur de peau : « Il peut y avoir quelques jours consécutifs de calme, mais ensuite, ça finit toujours par reprendre : des alertes anti-aériennes qui résonnent en moyenne trois fois par jour, la nuit, au petit matin, n'importe quand. C'est terrifiant. On dort très mal. C'est un stress immense de se réveiller la nuit parce que ça bombarde. Nous, nous habitons dans une maison et nous avons notre propre abri, un endroit où nous protéger à n'importe quel moment. Mais pour ceux qui habitent dans des étages élevés dans des immeubles, il faut courir dans les escaliers pour rejoindre la cave et pendant ce temps-là, on peut se retrouver à tout moment sous le feu. »Casque et gilet pare-balles pour les livreursPendant plus d'une semaine après le 30 décembre, le gouverneur de la région, toujours en première ligne, communiquant chaque jour avec sa population, a ordonné la fermeture de tous les lieux de rassemblement, même les centres commerciaux. La chaîne d'hypermarchés Lenta a, elle, maintenu les livraisons, contrairement à son concurrent Yandex. Mais depuis, elle a équipé ses livreurs - qui ne sont pas du personnel maison, mais des auto-entrepreneurs - de casques et gilets pare-balles.Igor a 26 ans, il est livreur depuis six mois pour Lenta, et porte pendant la totalité de ses heures de travail un gilet pare-balles d'une quinzaine de kilos : « c'est très lourd et ce n'est franchement pas confortable à avoir sur les épaules toute la journée, mais on ne peut pas l'enfiler très rapidement en cas de danger, alors je le porte systématiquement. En revanche, le casque est lui sur le siège passager de la voiture, et je le mets dès qu'il y a une alerte au missile. »Au siège de l'hypermarché, dès qu'une alerte retentit, on est rôdé : les clients descendent à l'abri de ce magasin équipé de vitres avec un filtre anti-éclats. La superviseuse des livraisons, Diana vérifie où se trouvent les livreurs et s'ils sont bien protégés, puis qu'ils ne repartent que lorsque les autorités ont signalé que tout danger est écarté. « Dans ce climat, les clients savent bien que leurs commandes peuvent être retardées, et ils ne se plaignent pas », assure Igor. « Au contraire, ils sont très reconnaissants que nous leur amenions leurs marchandises. »Ciel bleu azur sans nuages, soleil éclatant, partout en ce début mai en Russie, on sort fêter le début des beaux jours avec les premiers pique-niques, les week-ends à la datcha, affichant insouciance et indifférence à ce troisième printemps depuis que Vladimir Poutine a envoyé ses soldats en Ukraine. Seules les régions frontalières vivent ce mois comme le début d'une nouvelle saison de guerre.Une ville fantômeÀ Belgorod, aucun enfant ne joue dans les nombreux espaces verts, personne ne semble sortir sans avoir un but ou une tâche à accomplir. La ville a pris des allures de ville fantôme. Difficile de savoir combien ils sont, tout simplement claquemurés chez eux, combien ont quitté la ville et son agglomération, mais les signes d'un ralentissement économique sont là. Les hôtels sont quasi vides, les prix des réservations ont chuté, et Galina, la directrice de l'hypermarché Lenta, a bien noté un recul du nombre des clients : « nous avons dû réduire nos horaires d'ouverture, pour que les gens ne soient dehors que lorsqu'il fait jour. Nous sommes passés d'une ouverture de 7h à 23h, à 9h-17h en hiver, et en ce moment de 8h à 21h. Evidemment, cela aussi a affecté le nombre de clients venant en magasin, moins 30% depuis le début de l'année ».Dans cette ville aux arrêts de bus équipés de piles de sacs de sable, où les codes d'entrée des immeubles se désactivent en cas d'alerte bombardement pour que les passants les plus proches puissent entrer se réfugier au sous-sol, l'atmosphère s'est faite pesante, le regard posé sur chaque passant visiblement étranger aux lieux est lourd d'inquiétude et de méfiance.Peur de mourir Il reste aussi peu d'activistes ou d'opposants, et encore plus rares sont ceux qui, comme Ilya Kostyukov, militant du parti Iabloko (d'opposition mais encore toléré), s'expriment : « Le sourire joyeux a disparu des visages de la majorité des habitants, dit-il, sans doute parce qu'avant, ils ne réalisaient pas vraiment que c'était la guerre, mais depuis ce terrible bombardement du 30 décembre, ils ont vu le sang et réalisé que désormais, ils peuvent être touchés directement et mourir à tout moment. Beaucoup de ceux qui se disent patriotes vous diront qu'ils n'ont pas peur, que nous allons tous nous en sortir. Mais en réalité, chacun tremble quand il reçoit sur son téléphone la notification des autorités qu'un missile se dirige sur la ville et qu'il faut immédiatement interrompre toute activité pour aller se cacher. Les bombardements, tout comme la perspective qu'ils puissent survenir à chaque moment, ont un impact psychologique très fort sur la plupart des gens ».Qui est rendu responsable ? pour Ilya kostyukov, la peur a radicalisé les uns comme les autres, « ceux qui étaient pour la guerre le sont encore plus et ceux qui étaient contre, le sont encore plus ». Mais, dit-il aussi, « dans la partie de la population qui s'affichait neutre ou indifférente, beaucoup sont depuis passés dans le camp des soutiens du pouvoir ».Pour l'élu local légitimiste Vadim Radchenko, « des gens ont quitté la ville sous l'influence de l'émotion, ils ont eu peur pour leurs enfants. Mais ensuite, ils les ont laissés à l'abri quelque part puis sont revenus, parce qu'ici ils ont tout, à commencer par leur travail. Les autorités ont donné des consignes, comme de ne pas sortir sauf nécessité, ne pas garer sa voiture à l'extérieur mais dans des parkings souterrains, et les gens s'adaptent. La peur, tout le monde la ressent, particulièrement quand la mort peut frapper de manière indiscriminée, n'importe quand. On traverse la rue, on ne fait rien de mal et on meurt. C'est terrifiant. Mais la question est : en quoi cette peur se canalise-t-elle ? Pour moi, cette peur s'est transformée en désir d'en finir, et vite, avec ce qu'il se passe. Le désir est de repousser la menace le plus loin possible ».Après avoir promis à la population que la guerre qu'il a lancée ne changerait rien à la vie quotidienne, le pouvoir désormais parle de « vengeance ». Les habitants de Belgorod, eux, continuent à se terrer. Ils sont aujourd'hui plus de 300 000 abonnés à la chaîne Telegram de la ville qui signale chaque alerte aérienne.À lire aussiAlexandre Demidenko, russe qui aidait les réfugiés ukrainiens, mort en prison

This week we talk about foreign aid, brain drain, and long-term economic consequences.We also discuss the Rasputitsa, counteroffensives, and strategic rethinks.Recommended Book: The Kaiju Preservation Society by John ScalziTranscriptWe've done this a few times before, but it's been a while since I've done a real update on Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine—September of last year, I think, was the last one, a bonus episode on the topic—and a fair bit has happened since then, even if a lot of these happenings have been overshadowed by other conflicts, most especially the invasion of Gaza by Israel following the attacks on Israel by Gaza-based Hamas.But before diving into what's been happening, recently, in Ukraine, let's walk through a quick summary of events up till this point.In early 2014, Ukraine's people rose up against their Russia-aligned government in what became known as the Maidan Revolution or Revolution of Dignity.This was a long time coming, by many estimates, because of changes that had been made to the country's constitution and government since a decade previous, most of those changes orienting Ukraine more toward Russia's sphere of influence, authoritarian policies, and various sorts of corruption at the top, and the protests that led to this revolution began in November of 2013 before culminating in February the following year, which led to the toppling of the government, the creation of a new, interim government, the president fleeing to Russia, and new elections that kicked off a period of decoupling from Russian influence.This was not well received in Russia, which has long seen Ukraine as being under its sway, if not belonging to Russia, outright, Ukraine serving as a large, friendly buffer between it and Europe, so Russian forces were send in, the flags and other identifiers on their fatigues removed, to support separatists in the eastern portion of Ukraine.This sparked what became known as the Donbas War, which periodically flared up and sometimes merely simmered, but continued from when it began in February of 2014 all the way up to Russia's more formal invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, following several months of buildup along the countries' shared border.Against the odds and most analysts' assumptions, Ukraine managed to fend off Russia's initial assault, Russia managing to capture some territory, but not the capital city, Kyiv, and thus it wasn't able to decapitate the Ukrainian government and replace it with folks who would be loyal to Russia, as was apparently planned.Russia's stated plans changed several times over the next few years, as their assaults continued to falter in the face of stiffer than expected resistance, and eventually the so-called "special military operation" in Ukraine became a more overt, full-on war, complete with forced conscriptions, massive loss of life, the demolition of infrastructure and entire towns, and a recalibration of the global order, new alliances popping up, others being challenged, and everyone, to some degree at least, being sorted into categories based on who they support, who they don't, and who they are willing to tolerate despite not supporting—that latter category consisting mostly of less-aligned nations like Brazil and India, which have done pretty well for themselves, economically, staying somewhat neutral and aloof from this conflict, and thus continuing to deal with both the Western alliance supporting Ukraine, and the comparably small team of opposing nations, including China, North Korea, and Iran, all of which back Russia to varying degrees.In September of 2023, when I did the last update episode on this conflict, the state of play was largely defined by drone-based harassment of soldiers and infrastructure, like energy sources and bridges, by both sides against the other, Ukraine's flagging counteroffensive against Russia, which started out pretty good, but then ran intro trouble, seemingly due to sturdy Russian defenses that had been built around the portion of Ukraine they'd captured, the arrival of the "Rasputitsa" muddy season, which makes movement difficult in the region, and discussions about whether the US would provide longer-range artillery to Ukrainian forces, as Russia was comfortably settled-in, lobbing endless missiles and drones at Ukrainian forces and civilians, so longer-range munitions would help Ukraine counter that advantage, but there were concerns that this could lead to more attacks by Ukraine against Russian targets within Russia, which—because they would be using US weaponry—could help Russia justify expanding the war, which could, in turn, lead to WWIII, nuclear deployments, and the end of the world.There was also discussion about whether the US should keep sending tens of billions of dollars to Ukraine, with Republicans mostly saying it wasn't okay, and some European leaders, especially those in Hungary, saying the same, while essentially everyone else said we need to keep Ukraine stocked with weapons and ammo, as the money is well-invested.What I'd like to talk about today is what's happened in the months since, and what folks in the know are expecting to happen, next.—Since last September, the debate over sending money to Ukraine has increased in volume, with countries like the UK scrambling to increase their funding to help fill the gap left by the US, where Congress is still deadlocked over a $60 billion aid package, the lack of which has left the Ukrainian government in the lurch, debating tax increases and spending cuts, while also rationing ammo, because they've hit their ceiling in terms of spending.Most of those gap-filling aid packages from elsewhere, though, weigh in at tens or hundreds of millions, not billions, so one of the main challenges Ukraine faces right now is figuring out how to adapt their strategy for a wartime reality in which they're not well-funded from outside sources, as there's a chance more funding could eventually arrive from the US and other sources, but it's looking like the appetite for uncapped aid checks is drying up, even though Ukrainian President Zelensky continues to make the case that funding his country's defense is an investment, not a hand-out, because it ties up, and potentially even halts Russia's military ambitions in the area, which might otherwise be aimed at other nations Russia considers to be part of its orbit, and in some cases even thinks of as stolen territory, like Estonia—an attack on which would bring the whole of NATO into a conflict like the one Ukraine alone is facing, currently.Ukraine has also been escalating its attacks, mostly surreptitious, but sometimes a bit more flagrant, into Russian territory near their shared border, using on the ground special forces teams on occasion, but mostly leveraging their remote-controlled and autonomous drone fleet to strike primarily military and energy targets, like fuel depots and fighter jets parked at airports.Over this same period, Russia has hammered Ukrainian cities and towns with heavier-than-usual waves of rockets and explosive drones, targeting some military infrastructure, but more often hitting civilian centers, apartment buildings, and shopping malls.A much-vaunted counterattack by Ukraine against Russian forces occupying their territory in November of 2023 achieved a few small, mostly symbolic goals, but failed to tally the large number of strategic successes accomplished during another counterattack earlier in the year.This failure to replicate that previous success led to a wave of pessimism in Ukraine and allied nations, and new calls for some kind of peace talks—though then, as now, the Ukrainian government maintains that it won't hold serious talks until Russian forces have left the Ukrainian territory they've occupied, and they also say—with merit, according to most analysts—that any ceasefire before a Ukrainian victory would mostly benefit Russia, which would likely spend the time shoring-up its military and then invade again within the next few years, no matter what the terms of the ceasefire said.So a ceasefire, at this point, would seemingly favor Russia, and most experts think the current situation on the ground in Ukraine favors Russia, as well, though Russia is suffering some serious consequences from their invasion, both of the short- and long-term variety.In the short-term, Russia's economy—though not collapsing as many of the nations applying sanctions, like the US and EU countries, had hoped—is not doing anywhere near as well as it would have been doing, had this invasion not happened, or had it gone better for them, ending quickly, within a few days or a week, as they had initially expected.It's become a lot more difficult for them to do business with much of the world, too, and their influence over global energy markets in particular have been severely hamstrung, which in turn has lessened the geopolitical heft of the OPEC + Russia oil cartel.Russia has also nearly emptied its prisons, giving even incredibly violent and unstable prisoners the option of joining the military and being sent to the frontlines, those who survive granted their freedom; and this has reportedly led to a lot of horribleness back home, as these prisoners have been causing the sorts of trouble you might expect violent and unstable people to cause after being freed from prison, with the addition of also potentially suffering from the effects of PTSD and other sorts of trauma from having survived on the frontline of what has often been described as a meatgrinder sort of conflict, and in some headline-grabbing cases, they've brought military weapons back home with them, allowing them to cause enough more damage than would have otherwise been possible.Russian citizens also have to worry about being conscripted, in some cases grabbed from the street and taken, with little preparation, to the front line somewhere in Ukraine, and about the sporadic drone attacks from Ukrainian special forces and Russian groups that support Ukraine in this conflict.More abstractly, the Russian economy is not doing great, they've been largely unable to produce much in the way of high-end or high-tech goods for several years, now, and they're also running short of workers, more than 43% of industrial enterprises in the country reporting worker shortages as of July, 2023.In parallel, more than 1000 companies have withdrawn from Russia, including their own google-equivalent, Yandex, which took a 50% hit on its already substantially depleted value just to be able to leave the country and operate elsewhere; this has given the Russian government more direct control over their regional slice of the internet, but it's also a tradeoff many companies, international and local, have decided to make, as being cut off from the rest of the world and having significant sanctions applied to their behaviors if they stick around generally isn't considered to be worth the upsides.Also leaving Russia are its people. And while there will almost certainly be long-term consequences of those contemporary economic issues for Russia and Russians, this so-called "brain drain" could prove to be even more significant, especially when paired with the large number of deaths amongst Russia's troops, estimated to tally somewhere between 70 and 120 thousand since the full-scale, 2022-era invasion began.Also since late-February 2022, at least 2,500 scientists have left Russia, and that's on top of the around 50,000 Russia's own Academy of Sciences estimates it has lost over the past five years—all those researchers moving to greener pastures in other countries.An estimated 11-28% of the country's software developers have fled, and as of early 2023, it was estimated that hundreds of thousands of young people have left Russia since the invasion.Research from within Russia that same year indicated that about 1.5 million people under the age of 35 left the Russian workforce in the year between December of 2021 and December of 2022, alone, for brain drain and other reasons, and this—combined with all the young people who have been conscripted, adding up to around 521,000 soldiers by the end of 2023, the goal being around 745,000 by the end of 2024—that's a lot of people, all from a relatively narrow age demographic, roughly 18 to 30, who are not working, are not getting a formal education, who are not dating, not home with kids or their older family members, to take care of them.From a demographer's perspective, this is the seed-corn of a country, the next generation that will step into roles that are currently held by the adults in the room. And Russia is a country of around 144 million people, so it's not small, and these figures won't wipe them out or anything, but their population has been on the decline since the mid-1990s, and the median age in the country is already just over 39 years old.So losing, to other countries, to the black market, maybe, or to death, disability, or the other consequences of a military conflict, a significant chunk of the younger portion of your population is not ideal, as that leaves a country with fewer people who are capable of stepping into the roles that their elders will be leaving over the next few decades, and that means fewer younger people to keep the economy ticking along, to make discoveries, to earn money and pay taxes, which over time perpetuates all kinds of negative cascades and spirals, economically, demographically, and in terms of a country's capacity to compete, globally.One of the most long-lasting consequences of this invasion, then, could be a demographic collapse in Russia that leads to untold consequences, up to and including the eventual overthrow of a government that, no matter how cleverly it navigates this war and whatever happens next, won't be able to bring renewed equilibrium, safety, success, and flourishing back to the country, because of issues like demography that are not really salvageable once the dice are cast.Of course, Ukraine is in an even worse state, and would be even if all the money than had been promised and implied by its wealthy western allies had arrived on time: the country is devastated, its people are almost uniformly traumatized, it's governance and infrastructure is operating only at subsistence level, and some of its towns and cities have been almost entirely leveled, no buildings left standing, completely unlivable, and not just because there's no running water or electricity or shelter—the very soil in many of these areas, some of which are vital breadbasket regions for the world, have been polluted with toxins and chemicals from the conflict, and that's when they haven't been freckled with mines.Over the past few months, the story on the ground has remained largely the same, with Russia managing to take a few symbolic and moderately strategic cities and towns, and the front line barely moving at all in either direction.Ukraine has been hobbled by a lack of resources and those aforementioned defense lines Russia set up, after it committed to hold still, shooting long distance stuff, and periodically flooding the zone with meat-shield, waves of soldiers, which seems to be working decently well, though with a significant loss of life as a tradeoff.The Ukrainian leadership replaced the country's commander-in-chief in early February 2024, amidst rumors of disagreements between him in the president about how to proceed, and there's been word that the US is encouraging Ukrainian's government to settle in for the long-haul, rather than aiming for shorter-term victories and press release-worthy counterattacks, building up their in-country manufacturing capacity so they can produce their own weapons and ammo, and making it more likely that Russia will likewise be tied up indefinitely, having to invest more and more resources for every square foot it takes and occupies.The degree to which this will work has been questioned, and Russia has shown itself to be more than capable of striking targets well beyond the front lines, so anything Ukraine builds, especially in terms of military manufacturing capacity, would likely be targeted before it could come online.In Russia, anti-government sentiment was recently inflamed by the seeming killing of anti-Putin crusader Aleksei Navalny, who was previously reportedly poisoned by the Russian government, before returning to the country, being put in a prison camp, and then apparently killed—though the nature of his death and treatment of his body, family, and supporters after the event has left this sequence of events as much of a puzzle as the deaths of the other people who have run afoul of the Kremlin and then mysteriously died of poisons, by falling out of windows, and so on—the specifics are in question, but most experts assume these deaths were ordered by Putin or one of his people.The degree to which this will matter, how much this renewed support of anti-Putin people and causes will impact anything in a country that's pretty well locked down in Putin's favor at this point, is a big question mark right now.But it is a wildcard that could go on to influence this larger conflict, and the eventual state of this part of the world when it finally ends, whenever that happens to be.Though at this point, knowing what we know now, publicly, it seems likely to persist for at least another year, and maybe a lot longer than that.Show Noteshttps://www.semafor.com/article/02/06/2024/sale-of-russias-google-yandex-tightens-moscows-grip-on-the-internethttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/02/13/russia-diaspora-war-ukraine/https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/04/11/russia-lost-13m-young-workers-in-2022-research-a80784https://archive.ph/oEs0lhttps://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2024/01/brain-drain-hammering-russia-more-2500-scientists-have-already-left-disaster-experts-sayhttps://archive.ph/n1D8Rhttps://archive.ph/XXKPwhttps://archive.ph/YKfDRhttps://www.npr.org/2023/05/31/1176769042/russia-economy-brain-drain-oil-prices-flee-ukraine-invasionhttps://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/04/11/russia-lost-13m-young-workers-in-2022-research-a80784https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/russia-population/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_impact_of_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukrainehttps://www.reuters.com/world/india-says-it-busts-trafficking-racket-duping-people-into-fighting-russia-2024-03-08/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=emailhttps://www.reuters.com/world/us-embassy-warns-imminent-extremist-attack-moscow-2024-03-08/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=emailhttps://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240308-turkey-ready-host-ukraine-russia-peace-summit-erdogan-zelensky?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=emailhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/09/world/europe/russia-ukraine-avdiivka-villages.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/10/world/europe/ukraine-women-soldiers-army.htmlhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-ukraine-war-putin-nato-troops-latest-b2510252.htmlhttps://reuters.com/world/europe/pope-says-ukraine-should-have-courage-white-flag-negotiations-2024-03-09/https://www.reuters.com/pictures/ukraines-winter-war-scenes-frozen-frontlines-2024-03-08/https://www.wsj.com/world/russia-is-pumping-out-weaponsbut-can-it-keep-it-up-ba30bb04https://archive.ph/T6lK8https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_of_Dignityhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ukrainian_Warhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit letsknowthings.substack.com/subscribe

This is our Monday show, in which we look back at the weekend and the week ahead. A big thanks to Maggie for stepping back into the Equity seat while Theresa is out today.Here's what we got into:Stocks are mixed around the world as investors digest the possibility of high interest rates persisting for longer.Crypto price movements seem to have eased in recent weeks in the wake of bitcoin spot ETF launches.Yandex's parent to exit Russia: At a huge cost, it turns out. Given Russian sanctions, owning tech assets inside the country is not a good proposition. But when you sell, you will take more than a haircut.Everbridge is going private: For $1.5 billion, we hasten to add. Not a bad price bump for the 2016-era IPO, but still far from the value it commanded in 2021.And from Startup Land, Wonder Ventures has two new funds, Naboo raised $8 million, and ProducePay put together $38 million to tackle food waste.We closed out with this fascinating CNN story about how a finance worker was scammed out of $25M after a deepfaked conference call.We'll be back on Wednesday morning!For episode transcripts and more, head to Equity's Simplecast website.Equity drops at 7 a.m. PT every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, so subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. TechCrunch also has a great show on crypto, a show that interviews founders and more! Credits: Equity is hosted by TechCrunch's Alex Wilhelm and Mary Ann Azevedo. We are produced by Theresa Loconsolo with editing by Kell. Bryce Durbin is our Illustrator. We'd also like to thank the audience development team and Henry Pickavet, who manages TechCrunch audio products.