Podcasts about American Party

This is episode 52 of the Hidden History of Texas - The Compromise of 1850 and some Texans are already angry and ready to leave the union This is episode 52 of the Hidden History of Texas - The Compromise of 1850 and some Texans are already angry and ready to leave the union In the past few episodes, I've talked about relations between Texas and Mexico, Anglos and Mexicans, and how slavery was part and parcel of life in Texas. The fact that there was, and in reality, still is racial animosity and other types of bigotry towards non-whites and non-protestants among the Anglo citizens of Texas isn't, or at least shouldn't be a surprise. The earliest Anglo settlers primarily came from the Southern states and carried with them their culture.  They were very much like a large percentage of those who resided in many of the States, including some in the north. At the same time America was flexing its muscles and trying to expand its territory. From 1845 to 1865, America operated under the concept of Manifest Destiny as put forth by John L O'Sullivan when in 1845, he wrote,  “…the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions”.  Although originally written as a defense in the argument for admitting Texas into the Union, the article laid the foundation for justification of government actions that consequently had a negative effect on those who fell outside of the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant group. By 1850 one outgrowth of this belief was the birth of  a secretive society known as the American Order. The group stood firmly against Catholics, foreigners, and supported restrictions on immigration. They came to be known as the “National American Party' or more commonly labeled the “Know-Nothing” political party. In Texas, they were known as the “American Party” and as a whole they argued that any foreign-born citizen be barred from voting or holding public office. In Texas, the party was anti-Mexican, pro-slavery, and they pledged to vote only for native-born Protestants for public office. Remember from last episode, after the Mexican and American war ended, Texas wanted to annex the eastern part of New Mexico. Texas was also insistent on making certain that slave owners were not only allowed to keep their slaves but also to acquire more. Southern states who identified with  the Texas political views also wanted to make certain that Texas was a slave state.  It was not only Texas that the Southern leaders were concerned with; they also began to insist that ALL of the territory that was acquired as a result of the treaty of Guadalupe-Hildago that ended the war be opened to slavery. Needless to say, this did not sit well with those in the north who were abolitionists, and they were determined to prevent this from taking place.   Meanwhile Robert S. Neighbors, who had been sent to New Mexico by then Texas Governor Peter Bell to organize the 4 eastern counties of New Mexico into a part of Texas failed in his mission.  As a result of his failure in June of 1850 there was a public outcry where some called for the use of military force to take the territory and still others called for secession from the Union. Governor Bell chose to call a special session of the legislature (in Texas the legislature only meets every 2 years, usually it keeps them out of trouble) to deal with the issue. However, even before the session began, things managed to get worse. The government in New Mexico put forth a proposed constitution for a future state and the citizens easily approved it. In their constitution, they declared the state's boundaries to include the land claimed by Texas.  At this point, President Fillmore decided to become involved, and he ordered that the army should reinforce their contingent that was stationed in New Mexico. He also publicly proclaimed that if any militiamen from Texas entered the area,

For years all immigrants were allowed into the U.S., but some could not become citizens. Later, certain nationalities were limited or completely banned. This episode outlines those changes through the 1980s and discusses the pseudoscience of eugenics and how it was used to justify such bigotry and even involuntary sterilizations in the 20th Century. 

GWhat a CreepSeason 26, Episode 10“The Know-Nothing Party," Nativism, and Springfield, Ohio Today”If you have been keeping up with the news, you may have heard about the city of Springfield, Ohio, where there have been over 33 bomb threats (as of this posting) targeting its Haitian residents. How did this situation come about? Today, we will delve into the origins of the Know Nothing Party, also known as the American Party, a nativist political movement in the United States during the 1840s and 1850s. Understanding the history and policies of this party provides valuable insight into the current immigration debates in the U.S. Content Warning: Racism, bigotry, and general awfulness Sources for this episodeSmithsonianBritannica PolitcoCNNNewsweekSpringfield News-SunNew York TimesThe GuardianBBCSpringfield Commission Meeting August 27, 2024New York MagazineWashington PostNBC NewsThe AtlanticThe Dollop “Know Nothing”Be sure to follow us on social media. But don't follow us too closely … don't be a creep about it! Subscribe to us on Apple PodcastsTwitter: https://twitter.com/CreepPod @CreepPodFacebook: Join the private group! Instagram @WhatACreepPodcastVisit our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/whatacreepEmail: WhatACreepPodcast@gmail.com We've got merch here! https://whatacreeppodcast.threadless.com/#Our website is www.whatacreeppodcast.com Our logo was created by Claudia Gomez-Rodriguez. Follow her on Instagram @ClaudInCloud

Are you ready for Shofar-Blowing, Jesus praising, Power-Packed Wednesday Morning session with Stacy Whited?! If not, then get your mind right because we are LIVE at 11:11AM CST.Are you ready for Shofar-Blowing, Jesus praising, Power-Packed Wednesday Morning session with Stacy Whited?! If not, then get your mind right because we are LIVE at 11:11AM CST.TO WATCH ALL FLYOVER CONTENT: www.flyover.liveTO WATCH ALL FLYOVER CONTENT: www.flyover.liveTO WATCH ALL OF THE PROPHETIC REPORTS - www.thepropheticreport.comTO WATCH ALL OF THE PROPHETIC REPORTS - www.thepropheticreport.comFor Printable Versions of the Declarations - text DECREES to 40509For Printable Versions of the Declarations - text DECREES to 40509(Message and data rates may apply. Terms/privacy: 40509-info.com)(Message and data rates may apply. Terms/privacy: 40509-info.com)

In conversation with author and Pennsylvania State Senator, Nikil Saval In The Hollow Parties, Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld present a comprehensive history of the rise of American mass party politics through the Jacksonian era up through the years of Barack Obama to the presidency of Donald Trump. They posit that today's Democrat and Republican parties, at once overbearing and ineffectual, have emerged from the interplay of multiple party traditions that reach back to the founding, and they offer a vision for how these groups might fulfill their promise. An associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, Daniel Schlozman studies political parties, American political development, social movements, and political history. He is the author of When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in American History, a member of the Scholars Strategy Network, and a trustee of the Maryland Center for Economic Policy. Sam Rosenfeld is an associate professor of political science at Colgate University, where he researches party politics and American political development. He is the author of The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of Our Partisan Era, and his writing has also appeared in The American Prospect, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Vox, among many other places. Because you love Author Events, please make a donation to keep our podcasts free for everyone. THANK YOU! (recorded 5/21/2024)

The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics (Princeton UP, 2024) traces the political history of American political parties, not so much as historical institutions with different constituents—though it does that—but as living and breathing entities that have, over the course of more than 200 years, been, at times, vitally engaged with politics. The role of parties in the political system is to work in an organized way to get control of government and to connect electoral actors with the power to do things within the governmental system. Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld dive into all kinds of archival data and information to get at the records and comments of party stalwarts, not just presidents or elected officials often associated with the parties. They were looking to see how the folks who were inside the parties, or parts of the parties, thought about the parties themselves and their work in them. Some of this is well-trodden ground, but much of the political history in The Hollow Parties really fleshes out much more of the daily engagement among party members and how they made American political parties work and thus how they made American politics work. But part of the story is also that the parties did not and do not always work the same in tandem. In fact, according to the examples laced throughout the book, often times one party, say a dominant party like the Republican Party during and after the Civil War, or the Democratic Party in the post-war period, operated differently and was structured differently than its opposition. The underlying thesis of The Hollow Parties is that while the political parties at the moment, at this time of high polarization, may seem to be vessels of ideology antagonistic to stable democracy, in fact, we need parties to be vitally engaged in politics, as they have been in the past. Scholzman and Rosenfeld also note that the current polarized era has produced different outcomes in the ways the parties operate: for the Democrats, they become ineffectual; for the Republicans, they have become extremists. The Hollow Parties explains that it may currently feel as if the parties are hollow, especially on the Right where so many other entities have come into the space that had belonged to the party itself. But that the way to stem the crisis in democracy in the United States is for the parties to re-establish themselves as functional political institutions working with and in the formal components of the American political system. The Hollow Parties explains a kind of typology of how the parties in the United States operate and that at different times, each party has embodied different strands within this typology. This is a useful and important framework to consider how American political parties function and how these different strands aim towards different forms of operation and different goals. Finally, this book is beautifully written, marrying archival information with contemporary examples and whisking the reader along on a fascinating and revealing ride through American political development. The Hollow Parties focuses on American political parties but can't help but enlighten the reader about American history and current political developments that are all directly connected to past party activities and political history. Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics (Princeton UP, 2024) traces the political history of American political parties, not so much as historical institutions with different constituents—though it does that—but as living and breathing entities that have, over the course of more than 200 years, been, at times, vitally engaged with politics. The role of parties in the political system is to work in an organized way to get control of government and to connect electoral actors with the power to do things within the governmental system. Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld dive into all kinds of archival data and information to get at the records and comments of party stalwarts, not just presidents or elected officials often associated with the parties. They were looking to see how the folks who were inside the parties, or parts of the parties, thought about the parties themselves and their work in them. Some of this is well-trodden ground, but much of the political history in The Hollow Parties really fleshes out much more of the daily engagement among party members and how they made American political parties work and thus how they made American politics work. But part of the story is also that the parties did not and do not always work the same in tandem. In fact, according to the examples laced throughout the book, often times one party, say a dominant party like the Republican Party during and after the Civil War, or the Democratic Party in the post-war period, operated differently and was structured differently than its opposition. The underlying thesis of The Hollow Parties is that while the political parties at the moment, at this time of high polarization, may seem to be vessels of ideology antagonistic to stable democracy, in fact, we need parties to be vitally engaged in politics, as they have been in the past. Scholzman and Rosenfeld also note that the current polarized era has produced different outcomes in the ways the parties operate: for the Democrats, they become ineffectual; for the Republicans, they have become extremists. The Hollow Parties explains that it may currently feel as if the parties are hollow, especially on the Right where so many other entities have come into the space that had belonged to the party itself. But that the way to stem the crisis in democracy in the United States is for the parties to re-establish themselves as functional political institutions working with and in the formal components of the American political system. The Hollow Parties explains a kind of typology of how the parties in the United States operate and that at different times, each party has embodied different strands within this typology. This is a useful and important framework to consider how American political parties function and how these different strands aim towards different forms of operation and different goals. Finally, this book is beautifully written, marrying archival information with contemporary examples and whisking the reader along on a fascinating and revealing ride through American political development. The Hollow Parties focuses on American political parties but can't help but enlighten the reader about American history and current political developments that are all directly connected to past party activities and political history. Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics (Princeton UP, 2024) traces the political history of American political parties, not so much as historical institutions with different constituents—though it does that—but as living and breathing entities that have, over the course of more than 200 years, been, at times, vitally engaged with politics. The role of parties in the political system is to work in an organized way to get control of government and to connect electoral actors with the power to do things within the governmental system. Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld dive into all kinds of archival data and information to get at the records and comments of party stalwarts, not just presidents or elected officials often associated with the parties. They were looking to see how the folks who were inside the parties, or parts of the parties, thought about the parties themselves and their work in them. Some of this is well-trodden ground, but much of the political history in The Hollow Parties really fleshes out much more of the daily engagement among party members and how they made American political parties work and thus how they made American politics work. But part of the story is also that the parties did not and do not always work the same in tandem. In fact, according to the examples laced throughout the book, often times one party, say a dominant party like the Republican Party during and after the Civil War, or the Democratic Party in the post-war period, operated differently and was structured differently than its opposition. The underlying thesis of The Hollow Parties is that while the political parties at the moment, at this time of high polarization, may seem to be vessels of ideology antagonistic to stable democracy, in fact, we need parties to be vitally engaged in politics, as they have been in the past. Scholzman and Rosenfeld also note that the current polarized era has produced different outcomes in the ways the parties operate: for the Democrats, they become ineffectual; for the Republicans, they have become extremists. The Hollow Parties explains that it may currently feel as if the parties are hollow, especially on the Right where so many other entities have come into the space that had belonged to the party itself. But that the way to stem the crisis in democracy in the United States is for the parties to re-establish themselves as functional political institutions working with and in the formal components of the American political system. The Hollow Parties explains a kind of typology of how the parties in the United States operate and that at different times, each party has embodied different strands within this typology. This is a useful and important framework to consider how American political parties function and how these different strands aim towards different forms of operation and different goals. Finally, this book is beautifully written, marrying archival information with contemporary examples and whisking the reader along on a fascinating and revealing ride through American political development. The Hollow Parties focuses on American political parties but can't help but enlighten the reader about American history and current political developments that are all directly connected to past party activities and political history. Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics (Princeton UP, 2024) traces the political history of American political parties, not so much as historical institutions with different constituents—though it does that—but as living and breathing entities that have, over the course of more than 200 years, been, at times, vitally engaged with politics. The role of parties in the political system is to work in an organized way to get control of government and to connect electoral actors with the power to do things within the governmental system. Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld dive into all kinds of archival data and information to get at the records and comments of party stalwarts, not just presidents or elected officials often associated with the parties. They were looking to see how the folks who were inside the parties, or parts of the parties, thought about the parties themselves and their work in them. Some of this is well-trodden ground, but much of the political history in The Hollow Parties really fleshes out much more of the daily engagement among party members and how they made American political parties work and thus how they made American politics work. But part of the story is also that the parties did not and do not always work the same in tandem. In fact, according to the examples laced throughout the book, often times one party, say a dominant party like the Republican Party during and after the Civil War, or the Democratic Party in the post-war period, operated differently and was structured differently than its opposition. The underlying thesis of The Hollow Parties is that while the political parties at the moment, at this time of high polarization, may seem to be vessels of ideology antagonistic to stable democracy, in fact, we need parties to be vitally engaged in politics, as they have been in the past. Scholzman and Rosenfeld also note that the current polarized era has produced different outcomes in the ways the parties operate: for the Democrats, they become ineffectual; for the Republicans, they have become extremists. The Hollow Parties explains that it may currently feel as if the parties are hollow, especially on the Right where so many other entities have come into the space that had belonged to the party itself. But that the way to stem the crisis in democracy in the United States is for the parties to re-establish themselves as functional political institutions working with and in the formal components of the American political system. The Hollow Parties explains a kind of typology of how the parties in the United States operate and that at different times, each party has embodied different strands within this typology. This is a useful and important framework to consider how American political parties function and how these different strands aim towards different forms of operation and different goals. Finally, this book is beautifully written, marrying archival information with contemporary examples and whisking the reader along on a fascinating and revealing ride through American political development. The Hollow Parties focuses on American political parties but can't help but enlighten the reader about American history and current political developments that are all directly connected to past party activities and political history. Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics (Princeton UP, 2024) traces the political history of American political parties, not so much as historical institutions with different constituents—though it does that—but as living and breathing entities that have, over the course of more than 200 years, been, at times, vitally engaged with politics. The role of parties in the political system is to work in an organized way to get control of government and to connect electoral actors with the power to do things within the governmental system. Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld dive into all kinds of archival data and information to get at the records and comments of party stalwarts, not just presidents or elected officials often associated with the parties. They were looking to see how the folks who were inside the parties, or parts of the parties, thought about the parties themselves and their work in them. Some of this is well-trodden ground, but much of the political history in The Hollow Parties really fleshes out much more of the daily engagement among party members and how they made American political parties work and thus how they made American politics work. But part of the story is also that the parties did not and do not always work the same in tandem. In fact, according to the examples laced throughout the book, often times one party, say a dominant party like the Republican Party during and after the Civil War, or the Democratic Party in the post-war period, operated differently and was structured differently than its opposition. The underlying thesis of The Hollow Parties is that while the political parties at the moment, at this time of high polarization, may seem to be vessels of ideology antagonistic to stable democracy, in fact, we need parties to be vitally engaged in politics, as they have been in the past. Scholzman and Rosenfeld also note that the current polarized era has produced different outcomes in the ways the parties operate: for the Democrats, they become ineffectual; for the Republicans, they have become extremists. The Hollow Parties explains that it may currently feel as if the parties are hollow, especially on the Right where so many other entities have come into the space that had belonged to the party itself. But that the way to stem the crisis in democracy in the United States is for the parties to re-establish themselves as functional political institutions working with and in the formal components of the American political system. The Hollow Parties explains a kind of typology of how the parties in the United States operate and that at different times, each party has embodied different strands within this typology. This is a useful and important framework to consider how American political parties function and how these different strands aim towards different forms of operation and different goals. Finally, this book is beautifully written, marrying archival information with contemporary examples and whisking the reader along on a fascinating and revealing ride through American political development. The Hollow Parties focuses on American political parties but can't help but enlighten the reader about American history and current political developments that are all directly connected to past party activities and political history. Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social

The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics (Princeton UP, 2024) traces the political history of American political parties, not so much as historical institutions with different constituents—though it does that—but as living and breathing entities that have, over the course of more than 200 years, been, at times, vitally engaged with politics. The role of parties in the political system is to work in an organized way to get control of government and to connect electoral actors with the power to do things within the governmental system. Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld dive into all kinds of archival data and information to get at the records and comments of party stalwarts, not just presidents or elected officials often associated with the parties. They were looking to see how the folks who were inside the parties, or parts of the parties, thought about the parties themselves and their work in them. Some of this is well-trodden ground, but much of the political history in The Hollow Parties really fleshes out much more of the daily engagement among party members and how they made American political parties work and thus how they made American politics work. But part of the story is also that the parties did not and do not always work the same in tandem. In fact, according to the examples laced throughout the book, often times one party, say a dominant party like the Republican Party during and after the Civil War, or the Democratic Party in the post-war period, operated differently and was structured differently than its opposition. The underlying thesis of The Hollow Parties is that while the political parties at the moment, at this time of high polarization, may seem to be vessels of ideology antagonistic to stable democracy, in fact, we need parties to be vitally engaged in politics, as they have been in the past. Scholzman and Rosenfeld also note that the current polarized era has produced different outcomes in the ways the parties operate: for the Democrats, they become ineffectual; for the Republicans, they have become extremists. The Hollow Parties explains that it may currently feel as if the parties are hollow, especially on the Right where so many other entities have come into the space that had belonged to the party itself. But that the way to stem the crisis in democracy in the United States is for the parties to re-establish themselves as functional political institutions working with and in the formal components of the American political system. The Hollow Parties explains a kind of typology of how the parties in the United States operate and that at different times, each party has embodied different strands within this typology. This is a useful and important framework to consider how American political parties function and how these different strands aim towards different forms of operation and different goals. Finally, this book is beautifully written, marrying archival information with contemporary examples and whisking the reader along on a fascinating and revealing ride through American political development. The Hollow Parties focuses on American political parties but can't help but enlighten the reader about American history and current political developments that are all directly connected to past party activities and political history. Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

All Ears English Podcast is brought to you by BetterHelp. Try online therapy at betterhelp.com/AEE to get on your way to being your best self. Go to BetterHelp now to get started. Listen to the Business English Podcast to get tips on vocabulary, presentations, meetings in English, and more Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

 Political humorist, author and American Party candidate for Vice-President Tom Anderson made this speech in the late 1960s   Please visit our website www.campconstitution.net 

Abbott and Costello attend a party at the embassy of a Latin American country. Costello winds up fighting a duel. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/iloveoldtimeradio/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/iloveoldtimeradio/support

Since the election of Donald Trump in 2016, a party once based on free markets and multilateralism pivoted to a more nationalistic approach to immigration, trade, and military alliances. In this episode, Leonie Huddy discusses how - despite the fact nationalist sentiment has declined in the US over the last 20 years - a mix of political opportunism and economic conditions have led to the adoption of nationalist policies by the GOP. Leonie's paper, The Rise of Populism in the USA: Nationalism, race, and American Party Politics,  can be found here: https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/you.stonybrook.edu/dist/f/1052/files/2021/05/Huddy-and-Del-Ponte-The-rise-of-populism.pdf For a summary of this episode and other issues of the day, sign up for YDHTY's weekly newsletter at https://www.ydhty.com/news  

This volume explores the development of political parties in nineteenth-century United States of America through an extensive analysis of the official statements by a party in an election, the party platforms, and their connection with political elites and voters. Platforms indicate how party leaders reconciled local, state, and national conflicts and articulated their electoral appeals to various constituencies by showing discussions of their respective policies. Thus, party platforms are a valuable vehicle to assess electoral strategy and party development. By focusing on the platforms of the major political parties—Democrats, Whigs, and Republicans—at the state and national levels in presidential elections from 1840 to 1896, the author identifies three salient patterns. First, platforms reference economic policy more frequently and to a greater degree than other policy areas. Second, national policies are discussed more than state policies. And third, over time, the content of the platforms becomes more similar, reflecting the nationalization of the party system. This examination of nineteenth-century American party platforms traces political party development as a dynamic process involving partisanship, the presentation of internally coherent and consistent messages to voters, and polarization, the existence of conflicting policy positions across parties. Adam M. Silver is associate professor of political science at Emmanuel College. Jackson Reinhardt is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

This volume explores the development of political parties in nineteenth-century United States of America through an extensive analysis of the official statements by a party in an election, the party platforms, and their connection with political elites and voters. Platforms indicate how party leaders reconciled local, state, and national conflicts and articulated their electoral appeals to various constituencies by showing discussions of their respective policies. Thus, party platforms are a valuable vehicle to assess electoral strategy and party development. By focusing on the platforms of the major political parties—Democrats, Whigs, and Republicans—at the state and national levels in presidential elections from 1840 to 1896, the author identifies three salient patterns. First, platforms reference economic policy more frequently and to a greater degree than other policy areas. Second, national policies are discussed more than state policies. And third, over time, the content of the platforms becomes more similar, reflecting the nationalization of the party system. This examination of nineteenth-century American party platforms traces political party development as a dynamic process involving partisanship, the presentation of internally coherent and consistent messages to voters, and polarization, the existence of conflicting policy positions across parties. Adam M. Silver is associate professor of political science at Emmanuel College. Jackson Reinhardt is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

This volume explores the development of political parties in nineteenth-century United States of America through an extensive analysis of the official statements by a party in an election, the party platforms, and their connection with political elites and voters. Platforms indicate how party leaders reconciled local, state, and national conflicts and articulated their electoral appeals to various constituencies by showing discussions of their respective policies. Thus, party platforms are a valuable vehicle to assess electoral strategy and party development. By focusing on the platforms of the major political parties—Democrats, Whigs, and Republicans—at the state and national levels in presidential elections from 1840 to 1896, the author identifies three salient patterns. First, platforms reference economic policy more frequently and to a greater degree than other policy areas. Second, national policies are discussed more than state policies. And third, over time, the content of the platforms becomes more similar, reflecting the nationalization of the party system. This examination of nineteenth-century American party platforms traces political party development as a dynamic process involving partisanship, the presentation of internally coherent and consistent messages to voters, and polarization, the existence of conflicting policy positions across parties. Adam M. Silver is associate professor of political science at Emmanuel College. Jackson Reinhardt is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

This volume explores the development of political parties in nineteenth-century United States of America through an extensive analysis of the official statements by a party in an election, the party platforms, and their connection with political elites and voters. Platforms indicate how party leaders reconciled local, state, and national conflicts and articulated their electoral appeals to various constituencies by showing discussions of their respective policies. Thus, party platforms are a valuable vehicle to assess electoral strategy and party development. By focusing on the platforms of the major political parties—Democrats, Whigs, and Republicans—at the state and national levels in presidential elections from 1840 to 1896, the author identifies three salient patterns. First, platforms reference economic policy more frequently and to a greater degree than other policy areas. Second, national policies are discussed more than state policies. And third, over time, the content of the platforms becomes more similar, reflecting the nationalization of the party system. This examination of nineteenth-century American party platforms traces political party development as a dynamic process involving partisanship, the presentation of internally coherent and consistent messages to voters, and polarization, the existence of conflicting policy positions across parties. Adam M. Silver is associate professor of political science at Emmanuel College. Jackson Reinhardt is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Abbott and Costello were an American comedy duo composed of comedians Bud Abbott and Lou Costello, whose work on radio and in film and television made them the most popular comedy team of the 1940s and early 1950s and the highest-paid entertainers in the world during World War II. Their patter routine "Who's on First?" is one of the best-known comedy routines of all time. Their popularity waned in the early 1950s due to overexposure and their film and television contracts lapsed. The partnership ended soon afterwards. The team's first known radio broadcast was on The Kate Smith Hour on February 3, 1938. At first, the similarities between their voices made it difficult for radio listeners (as opposed to stage audiences) to tell them apart during their rapid-fire repartee. As a result, Costello affected a high-pitched, childish voice. "Who's on First?" was first performed for a national radio audience the following month. They performed on the program as regulars for two years, while also landing roles in a Broadway revue, The Streets of Paris, in 1939. Abbott and Costello on radio (note Abbott without toupee normally worn in films) After debuting their own program, The Abbott and Costello Show, as Fred Allen's summer replacement in 1940, Abbott and Costello joined Edgar Bergen and Charlie McCarthy on The Chase and Sanborn Hour in 1941. Two of their films (Buck Privates and Hold That Ghost) were adapted for Lux Radio Theater that year. Their program returned in its own weekly time slot starting on October 8, 1942 and Camel cigarettes as sponsor.

David Horowitz joins Marc Cox to promote his Oct, 2021 book, I Can't Breathe: How a Racial Hoax is Killing America

You may know Dakota Meyer as the badass Marine Corps vet who earned the nation's highest honor, or as the host of the American Party podcast. But in his latest book "The Way Forward: Master Life's Toughest Battles and Create Your Lasting Legacy" we hear another side of this warfighter. We talked about growing up a country boy in Kentucky, fatherhood, his days as a cheerleader? And some killer advice that everyone can use in their daily life.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

MTG calls Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham the worst Republicans in Washington.  Says voters are still outraged over the 2020 election.  And while angry and upset with Biden and the Dems, they want the GOP to give them a reason to vote Republican.  Get to know one of the strongest Patriots in Congress! GUEST:  CONG. MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE

Abbott and Costello were an American comedy duo composed of comedians Bud Abbott and Lou Costello, whose work on radio and in film and television made them the most popular comedy team of the 1940s and early 1950s and the highest-paid entertainers in the world during World War II. Their patter routine "Who's on First?" is one of the best-known comedy routines of all time. Their popularity waned in the early 1950s due to overexposure and their film and television contracts lapsed. The partnership ended soon afterwards. The team's first known radio broadcast was on The Kate Smith Hour on February 3, 1938. At first, the similarities between their voices made it difficult for radio listeners (as opposed to stage audiences) to tell them apart during their rapid-fire repartee. As a result, Costello affected a high-pitched, childish voice. "Who's on First?" was first performed for a national radio audience the following month. They performed on the program as regulars for two years, while also landing roles in a Broadway revue, The Streets of Paris, in 1939. Abbott and Costello on radio (note Abbott without toupee normally worn in films) After debuting their own program, The Abbott and Costello Show, as Fred Allen's summer replacement in 1940, Abbott and Costello joined Edgar Bergen and Charlie McCarthy on The Chase and Sanborn Hour in 1941. Two of their films (Buck Privates and Hold That Ghost) were adapted for Lux Radio Theater that year. Their program returned in its own weekly time slot starting on October 8, 1942 and Camel cigarettes as sponsor.

Tim, Ian, and Lydia join Dan Hollaway, US Army veteran and host/managing director of Drinkin' Bros and American Party podcasts, to discuss the Californian voters who were shocked to discover it appeared they had already voted in the recall election, the deep rot that's set in to the American military institution, the White Houses' decision to cut Joe Biden's feed when he attempts to ask a question at a news conference, the demoralization of the younger generations, and Claire Lehman of Quillette's choice to defend Australia's insanely tyrannical lockdown camps. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jarred Taylor welcomes Dan Hollaway, host and managing director of the Drinkin Bros podcast as well as co-host of the American Party podcast. Jarred and Dan have known each other for over 15 years to include deploying to Iraq together in support of the global war on terrorism. JT an Dan share stories from when they first met, discuss current events, and Dan's career path and extensive schooling.

Jeff Knows Inc Podcast Hosted by Jeff Lopes - Episode 133 - Dan Hollaway.  Dan is the Co-Host to the ultra popular Drinkin Bros Podcast and American Party Podcast.  Hands down one of the top conversations we have ever had on this show.  Instagram: Dan HollawayLinkedin: Dan HollawayFacebook: Dan Hollaway Jeff LopesWebsite: www.JeffKnowsInc.comEmail: Jeff@jeffknowsinc.comFacebook: www.facebook.com/jeffknowsincInstagram: www.instagram.com/JeffLopesThe Fastest Growing Community of Entrepreneur Dadshttps://www.Jeffreylopes.comSupport the show (https://www.jeffreylopes.com)

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer discuss the influence and power that Big Tech now has in Washington D.C., how to push back against the social media giants without going off the grid, and the importance of breaking out of echo chambers and surrounding yourself with others who don't always agree with your ideas and beliefs.    Go to ghostbed.com/drinkinbros and use code DRINKINBROS for 30% off EVERYTHING (Mattresses, Adjustable Base, and more) -- plus a 101 Night Sleep Trial and Mattresses Made in the USA!   Go to CardoMax.com and use promo code AMERICAN, and you get Buy One Get One FREE on your first order.

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer update the American Party's core principles for how people should conduct themselves when leading and serving others in America.    Go to ghostbed.com/drinkinbros and use code DRINKINBROS for 30% off EVERYTHING (Mattresses, Adjustable Base, and more) -- plus a 101 Night Sleep Trial and Mattresses Made in the USA!   Go to CardoMax.com and use promo code AMERICAN, and you get Buy One Get One FREE on your first order.  

Photo: Craig Whitehead on Unsplash The backdrop of this case is American Communism — infatuation with it and disillusionment with it.  Communism predicted a violent upheaval that would produce a better life.  In actual practice, it produced only drab, poverty-stricken dictatorships that killed and starved millions.  Around 1935, the American Communist Party stopped acting revolutionary and posed as “liberals in a hurry.”  It got a few hundred Americans to join the Communist underground and work secretly for the Soviet Union.  The issue is whether Hiss was one of those people.   Further Research Episode 4:  Podcast 4:  The great book of Communism is Das Kapital, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.  I've always found it impenetrably dense and boring; to follow it you have to know a lot about 19th century factories.  The best short (and readable) works expounding Communist theory and action plans are two by Marx, The Communist Manifesto and The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.  Among the many works from the Soviet Union describing Communism, the best short ones, in my opinion, are Lenin's “What Is To Be Done?” and Stalin's “The Foundations of Leninism.”   The best books about the reality and results of Communism are the short “Communism: A History,” by Richard Pipes and the long “The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression,” by Stephane Courtois and others. Two excellent descriptions of what it felt like to live in the 1930s and lose faith in laissez-faire Capitalism, and perhaps briefly to fall for Communism, are (1) Alistair Cooke's book about the Case, "A Generation on Trial: U.S.A. v. Alger Hiss" (Knopf 1950 and 1952), the first Chapter, titled "Remembrance of Things Past: The 1930s," and (2) Murray Kempton's essays about the radicals of the 1930s, "Part of Our Time: Some Ruins & Monuments of the Thirties" (Simon & Schuster 1955 and The Modern Library 1998), the first chapter, titled "A Prelude." All these books are available on Amazon. Questions:  What do you think was the appeal of Soviet Communism in the 1930s?  What did Communism have that fascism, socialism, and The New Deal lacked? If you came to believe in Communism, what would make you lose your confidence in it?  The obvious lack of democracy in the Soviet Union, the American Party's slavish adherence to every 180 degree change in the Party line from Moscow, the purge trials of 1936-38, and Stalin hopping into bed with Hitler in their 1939 Non-Aggression Pact?  Does Communism sound like a secular religion — with its all-encompassing philosophy, sacred texts, worshipped founders, and martyrs? Might part of Communism's appeal in the 1930s, compared to conventional religion, be that (1) it claimed to be rational, even scientific, (2) it promised paradise here on earth in just a few years (you don't have to wait for heaven), (3) you don't have to work for it (it's on the inevitable ‘timetable of history'), and (4) it frees the individual from any sense of personal sin? If you devoted your life to Communism and the Party and became disillusioned, what would you do?  Decide you had a bad picker when it came to politics and move on to baseball or real estate?  Remain a Marxist but not a Party member — hope another group will form and be “real Communists”?  Become a Socialist, or ‘get real' and join the Republicans or the Democrats?  Or, like Chambers and a few others, make anti-Communism the mainspring of the rest of your life?  

In honor of the Fourth of July, the gang invite Sonny "Hollywood" Pooni and Jenn Roberts-Veina back onto the show to make a playlist of American party rock songs. The catch is, nobody knows who picked what. Who will have the most guesses correct? Who will have the best list? Tune in to find out! Hosted by Steve Wright, Brian "BC" Chapman and Ryan "BB" Bannon Special Guests: Sonny Pooni and Jenn Roberts-Veina Produced by Dylan Wright Music by Mark Sutorka Spotify Playlist: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/4WQUQuHxcpNOAmvXFh9mN7?si=bcf184360e83444a Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PTHpodcast  

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer get into the immigration crisis at the border, why we need to deal with it in a way that ignores politics or else we are collectively doomed to fail badly, the Biden administration’s hypocrisy and incompetence on immigration, why immigration is surging now, what to do about all the children at the border, and what Border Patrol agents are saying.   CardoMAX is offering American Party an exclusive offer -- Buy One Get One FREE on your first order. Go to CardoMAX.com and use promo code American   If you're ready to take action and prevent hair loss, go to KEEPS.com/AMERICAN to receive your first month of treatment for free

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer discuss the prospect of the United States breaking out into a civil war in the near future, what that would potentially look like, and if we are currently in a "cold civil war" — plus Dan explains the main factors that cause any civil war and Dakota addresses the “controversial” statements he made on Zero Blog Thirty about the Capitol Riots and veterans.   CardoMAX is offering American Party an exclusive offer: Buy One Get One FREE on your first order. Go to CardoMAX.com and use promo code American.   Go to BABBEL.com and use promo code AMERICAN com for an extra 3 months free   Go to BlueChew.com and use promo code AMERICAN to receive your first month FREE. Try BlueChew FREE when you use our promo code AMERICAN at checkout--just pay $5 shipping!

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer discuss China’s mandate to make their boys more masculine while masculinity is under attack in the United States, the woke pledge the U.S. Navy is sending to its members, if the United States should keep defending Taiwan and what would happen if the United States fought China, who Dan believes is preparing for war.   The American Party Podcast is Presented by CardoMax.com   CardoMAX is offering American Party listeners an exclusive offer: Buy One Get One FREE on your first order. Go to CardoMAX.com and use promo code American.   ghostbed.com/drinkinbros  

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer give their thoughts on the Democratic Socialists of America winning elections for all the leadership positions within the Nevada Democratic Party, how the left-wing media treats Biden on immigration in comparison to Trump, how the United States can solve the immigration crisis in a pragmatic way while still being compassionate and not screwing over kids and refugees, and why Dakota needs to stop using jigsaw puzzles to pick up women.   The American Party Podcast is Presented by CardoMax.com CardoMAX is offering American Party listeners an exclusive offer: Buy One Get One FREE on your first order. Go to CardoMAX.com and use promo code American.   That’s BlueChew.com -- use promo code AMERICAN to receive your first month FREE. Try BlueChew FREE when you use our promo code AMERICAN at checkout--just pay $5 shipping.   ghostbed.com/drinkinbros  

A Historical Study of the Party System https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed10.asp https://www.cpp.edu/~smemerson/PLSGreed420/Madisonparagraphs.htm ——— Should Christians Engage the Political World? 1 Timothy 2:2 Daniel 2:20-21 John 17:15-16 ESV ——— The “Christian” Party https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html 1 Timothy 1:3-4 ——— Engaging the Party System and Politics in Light of the Bible https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1912/01/modern-government-and-christianity/376203/ ——— Production Music: Cutting Edge by Shane Ivers - https://www.silvermansound.com Scripting & Music: Drew Willer Audio Editing: Clay Ooms

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer take calls from APP listeners to answer questions about whether or not they think the Democrats will pass some sort of firearm ban or more restrictive gun laws, what the average person’s taxes should pay for and why the IRS is stupid, and why capitalism is the right system but why America needs to apply regulation and empathy to it in order to make it serve everyone instead of operating as a predatory force that only benefits the rich. ghostbed.com/drinkinbros Just go to BABBEL.com and use promo code AMERICAN for an extra 3 months free. 

When Millard Fillmore became president, the country was on the verge of collapse. President Taylor had just died, the Compromise of 1850 appeared dead, and southern secessionist were organizing a convention to plot disunion. The nation looked to Fillmore to save it.And he totally whiffed.Follow along as Fillmore uses the scapegoating of minorities to rise to power, postpones Civil War for a decade with the Compromise of 1850, destroys the Whig party with his overzealous enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act, and runs for president with the Know Nothings - a nativist secret-society-turned-political-party that dreamt of building an America where immigrants, catholics, and minorities are second-class citizens.Bibliography1. Millard Fillmore – Paul Finkelman2. Zachary Taylor – John D. Eisenhower3. Heirs of the Founders – H.W. Brands4. Abraham Lincoln – David Herbert Donald5. Franklin Pierce – Michael F. HoltSupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/AbridgedPresidentialHistories)

Mason, Sean, and Chris celebrate our nation's new leaders with a discussion about presidential inaugurations and the people chosen to perform at them. This episode is full of big opinions, but that's what you're here for anyway so stop reading this and listen already. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, and sign up for the newsletter. ——— Meaning What is a product of it's no sam studios  Created by Mason Hershenow  Produced by Sean Ang and Christopher Scott McNeill  This episode edited by Christopher Scott McNeill, with additional editing and mix by Mason Hershenow Theme music "January: Brief" by Mason Hershenow

Stay Tuned as the Coach and the Vet discuss the two political party failures and the need for an American Party in Podcast #6, Season 2. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thecoachandthevet/support

Dan Hollaway and Dakota Meyer discuss the events at the Capitol Building and Big Tech kicking Trump and Parler off their platforms, the GOP’s reaction to Biden’s election, and Dan continues to explain the American Party’s core principles how people should conduct themselves when leading and serving others in America. ghostbed.com/drinkinbros Visit SIMPLISAFE.COM/AMERICANPARTY for your free security camera today.

In this episode of American Party Podcast, Dakota Meyer and Dan Hollaway talk about the principles that define the American Party. This is the first part in a series of shows that will unpack our beliefs, what we feel is most important about America, and how to live those principles. This is meant to be an open conversation with the audience, and the concepts are meant to grow and evolve as we continue to discuss them together.

Dakota Meyer and Dan Hollaway talk about the new American Party, the purpose of the show, and how it’s important to have more questions than answers in today’s political climate. They discuss Amy Coney Barret’s appointment to the Supreme Court and the democrat’s plan to change the rules since they lost, how the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is a terrible piece of legislation, that we’ve never had a real discussion about health care in the United States, and our plan to outfit the entire White House with Ghostbeds once we’re elected. 

Dakota Meyer and Dan Hollaway talk about the new American Party, the purpose of the show, and how it’s important to have more questions than answers in today’s political climate. They discuss Amy Coney Barret’s appointment to the Supreme Court and the democrat’s plan to change the rules since they lost, how the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is a terrible piece of legislation, that we’ve never had a real discussion about health care in the United States, and our plan to outfit the entire White House with Ghostbeds once we’re elected. 

Dakota Meyer and Dan Hollaway discuss the new show and what the American Party is meant to be – a rejection of binary politics. The answer questions from the audience and weigh in on what we can expect from four more years of Trump or a Biden presidency, the insane tax rates under a Biden presidency in California, New York, and New Jersey, the second and third order effects of governors shutting down states, and what you as an individual can do to flex your status as the silent majority

Dakota Meyer and Dan Hollaway discuss the new show, the American Party, which isn’t meant to be a political party. Rather, it is meant to be a rejection of the idea of binary politics. The guys also discuss the cognitive dissonance on the left to nominate Hillary Clinton and now Joe Biden, our broken education system, and what it means to be a good person and good American. 

Hey y'all! This is a topic that historians describe as "a big 'un." For the next few weeks we're going to be talking about the election of Abraham Lincoln and all of the things that had to happen for a brand new political party go from upstart troublemakers to having control of the House, Senate, and Presidency in the span of six years. In part one, we're going full high school history on your butts! It's thirty years of all the Compromises that hit the snooze button on Civil War while also leading the nation into inevitable battle.

On this episode: Kamala Harris is the first African American woman and the first Asian person to be named on a major American Party’s Presidential Ticket. She is Joe Biden’s Democratic running mate and facing backlash from within the Black community and from the birther movement 2.0. What makes a person black? Should the Black community stand behind Harris even though she has held some controversial stances? Continued on the next episode…Show Prologue:Brothers Breaking Bread, or the “Triple B Pod”, is a collection of African American professionals, friends, and family that attempt to tackle the important issues of the day. We bring our unique brand of humor, sensitivity, and oftentimes anger to the analysis. The show features Rodger (@KcStork); “The Brothers of Doom” James and Joe; Anthony (10 Meters); Zeb (Da Soulja) Ada (Lady Lavender) and extended #3BPod family. We cut our teeth as podcasters creating nearly 100 episodes of the Negroraguan Podcast, we’ve kept much of the format and traditions with a few personal touches that come with a new show. We sincerely hope you enjoy, and subscribe to the show. Please contact us on Twitter @Triple_B_Pod or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/brothersbreaking.bread.7Music Cred:Show Intro- We Outchea - Joseph JeffersonOutro- It’s Over – Joseph JeffersonTerrible Thoughtz Album- Zeb Ore, Jason Jones, Jeremy Scott, Joseph Jeffersonhttps://soundcloud.com/joseph-jefferson-499547334/sets/terrible-thoughtzPhoto Editing:Jason JonesShow Title: Is Kamala Harris Black?-Should Police Be Handcuffing 8 Year Olds?Opening:https://twitter.com/kittywestmeow/status/1294069656366374912?s=25&fbclid=IwAR0USYRE6edfWoD2sSBFCFM-Wo2M0LFIBbN6WRwASVsfgSBkTZcQx_QdXlwIts Comma-La:https://news.yahoo.com/debunking-3-viral-falsehoods-kamala-141256895.htmlhttps://www.democracynow.org/2020/8/13/kamala_harris_prosecutorial_record_2020_election?fbclid=IwAR0p9EODC3fdxcZpF74uRHambnuanhBigpisnmKhI8O9AQQdezQAYqXKFykhttps://twitter.com/DrJohnEastman/status/1293541246489649154?s=09&fbclid=IwAR0XPFSvAzAAEDv95ZOMdCysPMYei9xu4iSX9Mju51y6Sqheor_ZD0CYi9Ehttps://www.joemygod.com/2020/08/zircon-burlap-kamala-harris-is-not-even-black/?fbclid=IwAR3YB1Dnhayv98Jpkgaj7EUbCgnYTAQNAfCv4WHMKeyjqsxkvhP6lkz2rzshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI8Vt-Jnjj0&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3HgXQ7W9ZBjToGngk7nak55Ur9q1zhtf-T16JrVYcAjvUXf1JRAcixvK4https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/virginia-mayor-urged-resign-after-saying-biden-picked-aunt-jemima-n1236601?fbclid=IwAR1lrs10unoVK2IzolD2GO07j7_AWTa7hfw7kugSmGE6MsWZTKM7EBZS0xQUSPS:https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/clarissajanlim/trump-post-office-usps-election-fundinghttps://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/13/trump-requests-mail-ballot-florida-primary-despite-rhetoric/3371605001/?fbclid=IwAR3YB1Dnhayv98Jpkgaj7EUbCgnYTAQNAfCv4WHMKeyjqsxkvhP6lkz2rzs8 year old arrested:https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/11/us/8-year-old-boy-key-west-arrest-trnd/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_content=2020-08-12T10%3A30%3A24&utm_source=fbCNN&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR13OB4ICioCXRnBc58e3th2sLDS91aRuAixkhNoinqXpVFJfhWeIUjczIgLeave your mask at home:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-sheriff-orders-deputies-not-wear-masks-bans-civilians-masks-n1236502?fbclid=IwAR0IHp2BCDdP_u5muo06WQR-LaMxMz2nJ51NVMhAB5m2P-w_myYWhKx9tWUBlack acting school:https://twitter.com/ByrdTheBuilder/status/1293755140663582726?s=07&fbclid=IwAR0USYRE6edfWoD2sSBFCFM-Wo2M0LFIBbN6WRwASVsfgSBkTZcQx_QdXlwAbuse of Authority:https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/08/14/sheriff-arrested-florida-jail/?hpid=hp_morning-mix-8-12-rr1_mm-sheriff%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans&fbclid=IwAR0tUw8EhFE5XEphR1_m6xuZwjdLwHMLFHTbdg9MGobWO1GSEvsoPoRcvE4Big Orange mountain:https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/10/politics/donald-trump-mt-rushmore-kristi-noem/index.htmlSports round up:https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/08/10/derrius-guice-allegations-girlfriend/?fbclid=IwAR3YB1Dnhayv98Jpkgaj7EUbCgnYTAQNAfCv4WHMKeyjqsxkvhP6lkz2rzshttps://www.arrowheadpride.com/2020/8/15/21370031/travis-kelce-pens-note-to-kansas-city-as-he-announces-first-purchase-after-contract?fbclid=IwAR1fqXRVkrvlVGTREnEFDpZi3QhsCZsbCNCafg3x3PqPh5F0y0Hjsxb--jchttps://sports.yahoo.com/sources-big-ten-cancels-fall-sports-hopes-to-play-football-in-spring-185919446.htmlhttps://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/29657762/the-story-college-football-wildest-week-ever

On this episode: Kamala Harris is the first African American woman and the first Asian person to be named on a major American Party’s Presidential Ticket. She is Joe Biden’s Democratic running mate and facing backlash from within the Black community and from the birther movement 2.0. What makes a person black? Should the Black community stand behind Harris even though she has held some controversial stances? Continued on the next episode… Show Prologue: Brothers Breaking Bread, or the “Triple B Pod”, is a collection of African American professionals, friends, and family that attempt to tackle the important issues of the day. We bring our unique brand of humor, sensitivity, and oftentimes anger to the analysis. The show features Rodger (@KcStork); “The Brothers of Doom” James and Joe; Anthony (10 Meters); Zeb (Da Soulja) Ada (Lady Lavender) and extended #3BPod family. We cut our teeth as podcasters creating nearly 100 episodes of the Negroraguan Podcast, we’ve kept much of the format and traditions with a few personal touches that come with a new show. We sincerely hope you enjoy, and subscribe to the show. Please contact us on Twitter @Triple_B_Pod or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/brothersbreaking.bread.7 Music Cred: Show Intro- We Outchea - Joseph Jefferson Outro- It’s Over – Joseph Jefferson Terrible Thoughtz Album- Zeb Ore, Jason Jones, Jeremy Scott, Joseph Jefferson https://soundcloud.com/joseph-jefferson-499547334/sets/terrible-thoughtz Photo Editing: Jason Jones Show Title: Is Kamala Harris Black?-Should Police Be Handcuffing 8 Year Olds? Opening: https://twitter.com/kittywestmeow/status/1294069656366374912?s=25&fbclid=IwAR0USYRE6edfWoD2sSBFCFM-Wo2M0LFIBbN6WRwASVsfgSBkTZcQx_QdXlw Its Comma-La: https://news.yahoo.com/debunking-3-viral-falsehoods-kamala-141256895.html https://www.democracynow.org/2020/8/13/kamala_harris_prosecutorial_record_2020_election?fbclid=IwAR0p9EODC3fdxcZpF74uRHambnuanhBigpisnmKhI8O9AQQdezQAYqXKFyk https://twitter.com/DrJohnEastman/status/1293541246489649154?s=09&fbclid=IwAR0XPFSvAzAAEDv95ZOMdCysPMYei9xu4iSX9Mju51y6Sqheor_ZD0CYi9E https://www.joemygod.com/2020/08/zircon-burlap-kamala-harris-is-not-even-black/?fbclid=IwAR3YB1Dnhayv98Jpkgaj7EUbCgnYTAQNAfCv4WHMKeyjqsxkvhP6lkz2rzs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI8Vt-Jnjj0&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3HgXQ7W9ZBjToGngk7nak55Ur9q1zhtf-T16JrVYcAjvUXf1JRAcixvK4 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/virginia-mayor-urged-resign-after-saying-biden-picked-aunt-jemima-n1236601?fbclid=IwAR1lrs10unoVK2IzolD2GO07j7_AWTa7hfw7kugSmGE6MsWZTKM7EBZS0xQ USPS: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/clarissajanlim/trump-post-office-usps-election-funding https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/13/trump-requests-mail-ballot-florida-primary-despite-rhetoric/3371605001/?fbclid=IwAR3YB1Dnhayv98Jpkgaj7EUbCgnYTAQNAfCv4WHMKeyjqsxkvhP6lkz2rzs 8 year old arrested: https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/11/us/8-year-old-boy-key-west-arrest-trnd/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_content=2020-08-12T10%3A30%3A24&utm_source=fbCNN&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR13OB4ICioCXRnBc58e3th2sLDS91aRuAixkhNoinqXpVFJfhWeIUjczIg Leave your mask at home: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-sheriff-orders-deputies-not-wear-masks-bans-civilians-masks-n1236502?fbclid=IwAR0IHp2BCDdP_u5muo06WQR-LaMxMz2nJ51NVMhAB5m2P-w_myYWhKx9tWU Black acting school: https://twitter.com/ByrdTheBuilder/status/1293755140663582726?s=07&fbclid=IwAR0USYRE6edfWoD2sSBFCFM-Wo2M0LFIBbN6WRwASVsfgSBkTZcQx_QdXlw Abuse of Authority: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/08/14/sheriff-arrested-florida-jail/?hpid=hp_morning-mix-8-12-rr1_mm-sheriff%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans&fbclid=IwAR0tUw8EhFE5XEphR1_m6xuZwjdLwHMLFHTbdg9MGobWO1GSEvsoPoRcvE4 Big Orange mountain: https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/10/politics/donald-trump-mt-rushmore-kristi-noem/index.html Sports round up: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/08/10/derrius-guice-allegations-girlfriend/?fbclid=IwAR3YB1Dnhayv98Jpkgaj7EUbCgnYTAQNAfCv4WHMKeyjqsxkvhP6lkz2rzs https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2020/8/15/21370031/travis-kelce-pens-note-to-kansas-city-as-he-announces-first-purchase-after-contract?fbclid=IwAR1fqXRVkrvlVGTREnEFDpZi3QhsCZsbCNCafg3x3PqPh5F0y0Hjsxb--jc https://sports.yahoo.com/sources-big-ten-cancels-fall-sports-hopes-to-play-football-in-spring-185919446.html https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/29657762/the-story-college-football-wildest-week-ever

Dr. James Rex, National Chair of The Alliance Party, joins host T.J. O’Hara on Deconstructed to discuss the rapid emergence of this new political party. Dr. Rex also describes the philosophical underpinnings of the party that he hopes will distinguish it from its peers. While only coming into existence on October 14, 2018, The Alliance Party has already built a significant number of ballot lines among the states and attracted candidates at the federal, state, and local levels. It also has a contract to which party candidates must agree that includes a commitment to term limits and a public disclosure of personal taxes as well as any campaign contributions and other income that is received while in office. Dr. Rex holds the distinction of being the last Democrat to win a statewide election in South Carolina when he was elected as the 16 th State Superintendent of Education in 2006. He also co-founded and is the former Chair of the American Party of South Carolina and has a distinguished leadership background in higher education including having served as President of Columbia College, Vice President of University Advancement at the University of South Carolina, and Dean of Education at Winthrop University and at Coastal Carolina University. The two-party monopoly has abjectly failed the American people. Dr. Rex shares why he believes The Alliance Party has a better path forward. The conversation is fascinating and informative. Listen to the discussion and determine for yourself whether The Alliance Party is an alternative in which you may be interested.

The People and the Ballot - A History of American Party Politics

 In the third instalment of Red in the Face we talk about what next after Bernie, who the hell do you vote for out of Biden and Trump and try to work out whoever Cornpop is.You can find links to Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Pocket Casts, Youtube and Band Camp via our Podbean page. Please listen, like, subscribe and spread the word https://redintheface.podbean.comPS: If your politics are informed by reading Harry Potter this is neither the episode or podcast for you.ReferencesManufacturing Consent - Naom Chomsky https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/78912/manufacturing-consent-by-edward-s-herman-and-noam-chomsky/The Democrats Seem Just Fine With Joe Biden’s Sexual Assault Allegations - Branko Marcetic https://www.jacobinmag.com/2020/04/donald-trump-joe-biden-sexual-assault-allegationsBernie Won (Iowa Caucus) - Chapo Trap House https://soundcloud.com/chapo-trap-house/unlocked-391-bernie-won-2520Yesterday’s Man: The Case Against Jo Biden - Brnaki Marcetic https://jacobinmag.com/store/product/67The United States Has Essentially a One-Party System - Naom Chomsky https://chomsky.info/20081010/CorrectionsWe also referenced Eugene Debs and that he was part of the American Party of Labor. In fact he was in the Socialist Party of USA and Verso have published a Graphic Biography of his life: https://www.versobooks.com/books/2916-eugene-v-debsIt was Julius Nyerere who said: 'The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.' https://www.marxists.org/subject/africa/nyerere/biography.htm 

Where are the lawyers? Lawyers do yer job! Sue for sedition! Sue for treason, the Whole Enchilada! This is not a party thang, because the Democrats are a mirror image of the Republicans. Let's get busy! Let's ACT! Now is to come to the aid of the party - the American Party - which we are all members! Call 202 224 3121 tell Congress #dumpyrump! TEXT OF LETTER TO THE EDITOR >>>>>>> Dear Editor: I personally find it Outrageous for an IMPEACHED POTUS to harass governors and endanger the health and safety of our medical personnel in USA

Branné je iné. Ako sa zmenilo a ako ste s tým spokojní. Ali a Danka vytiahnú z matikárky Zuzany Galeštokovej tajné rodinné zbrane na chrípku, prezradia viac o tohtoročnej školskej American Party a predstavia naše nové školské poisly. A na záver trochu vážnejšie, ale zároveň odľahčene, vtipne a odborne s teológom a historikom Tomášom Harbuľákom o sviatkoch Všetkých svätých a Dušičkách.

Of registered voters in the United States, almost 40% are Democrats and almost 30% are Republicans. That means around 30%, or around 34 million people, fall outside these two political parties. How come we only think of elephants and donkeys when we think of politics? In this episode of the Pertinent Information Podcast, Josh Sopko and I talk about why we are  in the political party situation we are in, how did we get here, and how do we get away from this standard?  We go into recent third-party candidate wins,  the history of political parties, other voting systems, and more. Data:  July 2018 Registered Voters (RVs) by PartyTotal RVs: 110,943,417Democrats: 44,242,975 (39.88%)Republicans: 32,570,817 (29.36%)Independent: 31,489,028 (28.38%)Others: 2,640,597 (2.38%) Most Recent Data of the Top 3 Third PartiesLibertarians: 511,277 (0.46%)Green Party: 250,000 (0.22%)Constitution Party: 97,983 (0.09%) Ranked-Choice Votinghttps://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV) In the United States, it is rare for third party and independent candidates, other than those of the six parties which have succeeded as major parties Federalist PartyDemocratic-Republican PartyNational Republican PartyDemocratic PartyWhig PartyRepublican Party The last time it happened was in 1856 when the Republicans supplanted the Whigs, who had withered and endorsed the ticket of the American Party. In the 58 presidential elections since 1788, third party or independent candidates have won at least 5.0% of the vote or garnered electoral votes 12 times (21%).  The last third party candidate to win a state was George Wallace of the American Independent Party in 1968.The last third party candidate to win more than 5.0% of the vote was Ross Perot, who ran as an independent and as the standard-bearer of the Reform Party in 1992 and 1996, respectively.The closest since was Gary Johnson in 2016, who gained 3.3% of the vote running as the Libertarian nominee. The most recent third-party candidates to receive an electoral vote were Libertarian Ron Paul and Yankton Sioux Nation independent Faith Spotted Eagle who received a vote each from faithless electors in 2016.

Of registered voters in the United States, almost 40% are Democrats and almost 30% are Republicans. That means around 30%, or around 34 million people, fall outside these two political parties. How come we only think of elephants and donkeys when we think of politics? In this episode of the Pertinent Information Podcast, Josh Sopko and I talk about why we are  in the political party situation we are in, how did we get here, and how do we get away from this standard?  We go into recent third-party candidate wins,  the history of political parties, other voting systems, and more. Data:  July 2018 Registered Voters (RVs) by PartyTotal RVs: 110,943,417Democrats: 44,242,975 (39.88%)Republicans: 32,570,817 (29.36%)Independent: 31,489,028 (28.38%)Others: 2,640,597 (2.38%) Most Recent Data of the Top 3 Third PartiesLibertarians: 511,277 (0.46%)Green Party: 250,000 (0.22%)Constitution Party: 97,983 (0.09%) Ranked-Choice Votinghttps://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV) In the United States, it is rare for third party and independent candidates, other than those of the six parties which have succeeded as major parties Federalist PartyDemocratic-Republican PartyNational Republican PartyDemocratic PartyWhig PartyRepublican Party The last time it happened was in 1856 when the Republicans supplanted the Whigs, who had withered and endorsed the ticket of the American Party. In the 58 presidential elections since 1788, third party or independent candidates have won at least 5.0% of the vote or garnered electoral votes 12 times (21%).  The last third party candidate to win a state was George Wallace of the American Independent Party in 1968.The last third party candidate to win more than 5.0% of the vote was Ross Perot, who ran as an independent and as the standard-bearer of the Reform Party in 1992 and 1996, respectively.The closest since was Gary Johnson in 2016, who gained 3.3% of the vote running as the Libertarian nominee. The most recent third-party candidates to receive an electoral vote were Libertarian Ron Paul and Yankton Sioux Nation independent Faith Spotted Eagle who received a vote each from faithless electors in 2016.

In this episode I look at the rise of Abe Lincoln as a force to be reckoned with in national politics. I also look at the way the parties were starting to divide in the 1850's with the death of the Whig Party, the birth and death of the American Party, and the birth of the Republican Party.

With spring underway, Jene asks Jerry about the “Springer Break” shows he did a few years back with MTV. Jene tells about a conversation he had last week with his mom involving the funeral director at his dad's funeral visitation. Jerry then also tells a new joke. Jene's phone rings and he… See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Dave Moore is an independent-thinking, non-corporate candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 3rd Congressional District of South Carolina. He's representing the American Party of South Carolina. Listen to Dave's strong opinions on several topics including the two-party system, foreign policy, the drug war, corporate crime, prison reform, and more. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/rackets/support

Power to the People gettin' off that crazy train Power to the People takin' shelter from the rain Getting ready for the party puttin on our dancing shoes Takin off our MAGA hats & Turnin' red states blue! Russia attacked the USA Republicans did nothing Putin put his puppet in place Republicans made him king Power to the People gettin' off that crazy train Power to the People takin' shelter from the rain Watchin' the tide arisin' all the boats arisin' too! The sun and moon are pullin' pullin' red states blue! Russia attacked our democracy Republicans did nothing Putin poisoned our humanity Republicans kept on sucking Power to the People! Power to me and you! Power to the People! Turnin' red states blue

Trump: And the Politics of Resentment[col. writ. 7/31/15] © ’15 Mumia Abu-JamalWhen New York billionaire and GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump launched into his anti-immigrant tirade against Mexicans crossing the border, he was using a long known political technique of plugging into the live wire of American resentment of the other.Today, it’s Latinos, of course; more precisely, those from the Southern borders: Mexicans, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, Hondurans, and the like.But, since the 19th century, politicians have used these currents of fear to fuel movements against those who came from abroad. In these days though, the targets of nativist’s ire were the Irish, Russian Jews, Italians and other European sites.These forces gave birth to the American Party, a fierce anti-immigrant group that became known popularly as the Know Nothings. They formed a third party during the 1850s, and ran former U.S. President Millard Fillmore as their unsuccessful candidate.U.S. historian Richard Hofstadter (1910-70), in his classic work, ‘The Paranoid Style in American Politics’, argued that much of the energy in the anti-immigrant forces, stemmed from what might be called ‘status anxiety’, or the intense insecurities of people unsure of their place in U.S. society, but who could point to others - immigrants - who held weaker positions in society. Furthermore, these anxiety-ridden groups often have mixed feelings of fear and admiration of social elites; and who is more elite then the super-rich?Witness the spectacle of Donald Trump, who, without question, is perhaps the richest man ever to run for president - and is a billionaire populist, no less!I wouldn’t get too excited about his place in the polls right now. In 2012 the toast of both press and polls was a pizza exec named Herman Cain. We know how that worked out.But most candidates, especially of the GOP, worship at the throne of the wealthy, for they are the ones they serve.The thousands and millions who rage at Latino immigrants also worship the rich.In Donald Trump they have found their voice. And he has found the energies of resentment undeniable fuel for failure.© ‘15maj

From Part I of A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II: "The History of Money and Banking Before the Twentieth Century". Narrated by Matthew Mezinskis.