Podcasts about Courtroom

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

On this week's show, Josh shares his harrowing experience in Israel as Iran launched daily attacks. From sprinting to bomb shelters in under 90 seconds at all hours, to the emotional journey back home, Josh recounts it all. He also weighs in on President Trump's targeted strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — and why he believes it was exactly the right move. Plus, Josh breaks down last week's Supreme Court victory and the broader implications of its ruling on birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Mind Yo' Business, recorded inside the Ruoff Mortgage Podcast Studio in partnership with Karan Rastall (NMLS#763395), Andrew sits down with Robert Mack, a State Prosecutor whose journey to the courtroom started in an unexpected place: the stage. Robert shares how his early love of theater and a difficult academic detour—including failing out of Indiana University—led to a major turning point in his life. Determined to rewrite his story, he went on to complete his undergraduate degree, successfully passed the law school admission requirements, and was accepted into DePaul University College of Law, where he earned his JD. Since graduating, Robert has worked across family law and criminal law, handling everything from DUIs to murder trials. He talks candidly about his passion for trial work, his belief in the justice system, and the real-world pressures and political interference that make the job more complicated than most people realize. And in one of the episode's most surprising moments, Robert drops an unexpected comparison to Daniel Lambert, the famously large Englishman, using it as a thoughtful metaphor about how people can carry visible weight and invisible burdens—but still stand tall and command a room. If you've ever wondered what it takes to rise from personal failure to professional impact—or what it's really like behind the scenes of the legal system—this episode is for you.     Podcast Studio Sponsor Podcast Sponsor   Podcast Sponsor Podcast Sponsor   Episode 1-6 Sponsor  

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Huge shoutout to The Heel Shit Podcast for letting us borrow their audio—check them out everywhere you get your wrestling fix!This week on Week in Wrestling, Edgar from The Snug Wrestling Podcast jumps into the Tuesday night chaos with the Heel Shit crew, and things get real as they crack open the biggest headline outside the ring: the Jon Moxley/AEW lawsuit.A former contracted employee is taking both Moxley and AEW to court—and the squad is breaking it all down:What's behind the allegations?Why is Moxley named personally?How might this impact AEW moving forward?This is Part 1 of the Moxley Lawsuit Review, and trust us—you don't want to miss this ringside view into the legal drama shaking the wrestling world.

FULL SHOW: Thursday, June 26th, 2025 Curious if we look as bad as we sound? Follow us @BrookeandJeffrey: Youtube Instagram TikTok BrookeandJeffrey.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Music for Breakfast, hosts Octavia March, J. Manning, and Kia "KC" discuss the opening arguments in the highly publicized ASAP Rocky shooting trial. ASAP Relli has filed a civil lawsuit alleging that ASAP Rocky shot at him during a confrontation in 2021. The prosecution presented text messages and video evidence, while the defense contends that Relli's accusations are financially motivated and claims the gun was a prop. The episode explores the courtroom drama, key evidence, and witness testimonies, and offers opinions on the case's credibility. Tune in for a thought-provoking discussion intertwined with music and cultural insights.00:00 Introduction to the ASAP Rocky Shooting Case00:52 Welcome to Music for Breakfast01:39 Overview of the ASAP Rocky Shooting Trial03:41 Details of the Confrontation and Evidence06:15 Courtroom Drama and Defense Arguments07:54 Prosecution's Case and Key Evidence15:06 Conclusion and Final Thoughts16:18 Outro and Where to Follow#asaprocky #courtcase #lawsuit #hiphop #rap #music #fyp #trending #youtube Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS

Prosecutors just gave their final, scathing argument in Sean “Diddy” Combs' federal trial — calling him the mastermind of a criminal enterprise built on abuse, fear, and control. They accused him of forcing women into sex acts, manipulating employees, and threatening to expose them if they didn't obey. With the jury preparing to deliberate, Diddy's future may hinge on what happens next. Host: Jason Beckerman Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Summary From Courtroom to Camera: Don Worley's Journey into Independent Film In this episode of Filmmaking Conversations, Damien Swaby sits down with the multitalented Don Worley — a nationally recognized personal injury attorney, former stand-up comedian, and now a dynamic force in independent cinema. Don shares his unconventional journey from high-stakes legal battles to red carpets at the Chinese Theatre. As the producer and star of Time for Sunset, a gripping crime thriller, and co-creator of the hit streaming series Power of Attorney, Don opens up about navigating the worlds of justice and storytelling.

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell has lost his defamation lawsuit and somehow has also declared total victory. The gang dives deeper into the mind of this fascinating man, only to discover that his brains are made entirely of patented ‘fill'. Jake has read Mike's biography and will be performing multiple passages. Subscribe for $5 a month to get all the premium episodes: www.patreon.com/qaa Editing by Corey Klotz. Theme by Nick Sena. Additional music by Pontus Berghe. Theme Vocals by THEY/LIVE (https://instagram.com/theyylivve / https://sptfy.com/QrDm). Cover Art by Pedro Correa: (https://pedrocorrea.com) https://qaapodcast.com QAA was known as the QAnon Anonymous podcast.

For more information and support, visit our NEW WEBSITE! https://www.thecirsgroup.com Today we are continuing our recap of the talks we heard at CIRSx 2025, and specifically we will be covering the legal and psychological topics. Here are the talks we will be recapping: CIRS Research Committee Update: An Update on the CIRS Research with Glenn DiTulio A Lawyer's Shared Experience as a CIRS Patient, Lawyer and the Legal Future of CIRS with Ryan Schnack, Esq. The Psychological Journey of CIRS Recovery: Rediscovering Agency and Purpose on the Healing Path with Ryan J. Holsapple, PhD Using Data to Restore Truth in the Courtroom with Dr. Scott McMahon Fight for Your Right to Practice with Dr. Lauren Sparks, DNP, CNP, APRN Complex Family Systems in CIRS with Dr. Jennifer Lynn Smith TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Introduction and Disclaimer 00:40 The CIRS Research Committee by Glenn DiTulio 02:47 A Lawyer's experience with CIRS by Ryan Schnack, Esq. 08:56 A husband's story of supporting his wife through CIRS by Ryan Holsapple, PhD 13:21 Published Research to support CIRS in legal battles by Dr. Scott McMahon 16:47 Fight for your right to practice by Dr. Lauren Sparks 21:15 Complex Family Systems in CIRS with Dr. Jennifer Lynn Smith 24:32 Conclusion and Next Episode Preview Helpful Links/Info: Official CIRSx website: https://www.cirsx.com/ CIRS Research Foundation: https://cirs-research-foundation.org/ Email Glenn about the CIRS Research Foundation's work: glenn@regenixhealing.com Melanie Pensak's website: https://www.melaniepensak.com/ Ryan Schanck, Esq.'s website: https://www.ryanschnacklaw.com/ Codes to use so CIRS symptoms are taken seriously in legal situations: 277.120: Contact with toxic exposure R65.10: Chronic Inflammation R65.11: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) M35.81: COVID- multi system inflammatory response syndrome Ryan Holsapple , PhD's website: https://www.centerforcreativechoice.com/ Dr. Scott McMahon's website: https://scottmcmahon.doctor/ Dr. Lauren Sparks' website: https://www.untamediona.com/ Dr. Jennifer Lynn Smith's website: https://www.silvertreewellness.com/ Order Jacie's book! The 30 Day Carnivore Bootcamp: https://a.co/d/7MgHrRs The CIRS Group: Support Community: https://thecirsgroup.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecirsgroup/ Find Jacie for carnivore, lifestyle and limbic resources: Jacie's book on the Carnivore diet!  https://a.co/d/8ZKCqz0 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ladycarnivory YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@LadyCarnivory Blog: https://www.ladycarnivory.com/ Find Barbara for business/finance tips and coaching: Website: https://www.actlikebarbara.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/actlikebarbara/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@actlikebarbara Jacie is a Shoemaker certified Proficiency Partner, NASM certified nutrition coach, author, and carnivore recipe developer determined to share the life changing information of carnivore and CIRS to anyone who will listen. Barbara is a business and fitness coach, CIRS and ADHD advocate, writer, speaker, and a big fan of health and freedom. Together, they co-founded The CIRS Group, an online support community to help people that are struggling with their CIRS diagnosis and treatment.

Reggie gives his recap and key takeaways from Week 1 vs. Indy — what stood out, what needs fixing, and what's encouraging going forward. Then, in ITL Lunch-Time Confessions, Lopez has a new favorite linebacker. Plus, ITL heads to court, where Judge John Lopez presides over some of the wildest cases in sports and entertainment to deliver some overdue verdicts.

SPECIAL EPISODE: In a June 2025 decision, the Oregon Court of Appeals delivered a controversial ruling on forensic evidence admissibility in State v. Adams, a case involving a 2018 shooting in Portland. The ruling has been interpreted and reported as a categorical rejection of the method of linking spent shell casings to a particular firearm—commonly used for decades. The court argued that the State failed to establish the scientific validity of the method under Oregon's rules of evidence. In this special edition of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins shares his thoughts on the ruling, how important it is, and what it might mean for the future of not only firearm identification, but of all of the forensic pattern identification disciplines.  Season:  5 Episode:  94 Duration:  29:31 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES Article by Oregonian/Oregon Live Court Ruling in State v. Adams ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Diddy, Blake Lively, Amber Heard… we've got a little news on a lot of the biggest trials of recent memory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Judy Weber is a serial entrepreneur and business expansion expert helping women grow confidence and incorporate proven business strategies for scale while building on a foundation of faith. A former trial lawyer who has built businesses across marketing, real estate and interior design, Judy teaches her clients to think and win like a courtroom dynamo, integrating her legal experience with her faith-fueled approach to entrepreneurship. Host of the long running, globally ranked Bold Business Bold Faith podcast, Judy's mission is to normalize miraculous results for Christian women in business, emphasizing that success is inevitable when one operates from a place of calm, confidence, and certainty. She serves service-based businesses with coaching and the “Miraculous Mastermind” to master scaling.

Achieving Success with Olivia Atkin Episode 139 "Achieve Clarity & Empowerment: From Legal Battles To Breakthrough Conversations with Lesa Koski"Olivia talks personal and professional achievements with Lesa Koski. Lesa Koski is a seasoned attorney and family mediator, specializing in helping clients navigate divorce and family law matters with clarity and compassion. As the President and Founder of Koski Law and Mediation, PLLC, she has spent over seven years providing expert legal guidance, while also serving as a State Qualified Neutral, ensuring fair and peaceful resolutions. In addition to her legal work, Lesa is the host of Saddle Up Live, a podcast dedicated to empowering women over 40 through conversations on faith, wellness, relationships, and personal growth. Drawing from her own life experiences, she offers practical advice and strategies to help women embrace life's transitions with confidence. Whether in the courtroom or behind the mic, Lesa is committed to guiding others toward resilience, success, and fulfillment.Join Olivia every Tuesday as she brings on top notch guests to talk about how they are Achieving Success! Career Development Book and More at Achieving-success.comStay Connected With Us:Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/achieving-success-llcInstagram: @_achievingsuccessTwitter: @_achievesuccessFacebook: @Achieving SuccessYou can find Lesa Koski:LinkedIn: Lesa KoskiWebsite: familyandcivilmediation.com/ Email: lesa.koski@gmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/achieving-success-with-olivia-atkin--5743662/support.

In this episode of See You In Court, hosts Robin Frazer Clark and Lester Tate sit down with one of Georgia's most dynamic legal voices—Attorney Joyce Gist Lewis. From her early days in theater to becoming co-managing partner of one of the largest women-owned law firms on the East Coast, Joyce shares her inspiring story, her landmark legal battles, and her unwavering commitment to the rule of law.

What happens when true crime meets real estate? In this candid and captivating episode, host Allyson Sullivan steps outside the MLS and dives headfirst into the gripping trial of Karen Read — the Massachusetts woman accused (and acquitted) of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. Joined by her friend Jeanine, Allyson unpacks the details with storytelling precision, drawing from weeks of obsessive courtroom coverage, firsthand analysis, and deep emotional investment. From the mysterious butt dials and a Google search at 2 AM to the "crash daddies" and a German shepherd no one can locate, this isn't just true crime — it's a case study in bias, betrayal, and broken systems.Whether you followed the trial or are hearing about it for the first time, this episode will have you questioning everything. Did Karen really hit him with her SUV? Or did something far darker happen inside a house full of cops and secrets? Get ready for a rollercoaster of fact, theory, and fire — all through the lens of a storyteller who isn't afraid to say what the news wouldn't. You'll walk away rethinking what justice means in a small town where everyone knows everyone… and maybe, covers for them too.Contact Allyson Sullivan:Email: AllysonSL@hotmail.comIG: @allysonsullivanrealtorWebsite: www.allysonsullivan.com

In this episode of JKL Media recorded on June 22nd, hosts Jesse, Karen, and Lou discuss their appreciation for Aaron Sorkin's works, with a primary focus on his film 'The Trial of the Chicago 7'. Jesse expresses his admiration for Sorkin's storytelling, highlighting the significant impact Sorkin's works have had on him. Karen and Lou also share their thoughts on the film, discussing the authenticity of its historical portrayal, the strong cast performances, and the relevance of its themes in today's political climate. Lou brings a non-American perspective, pointing out the challenges of dramatizing real events while retaining accuracy. The discussion touches on the broader context of political manipulation within judicial systems and the need for contemporary figures who are willing to stand up for their beliefs as vehemently as historical activists like Abby Hoffman. The episode concludes with reflections on how current events mirror past political @jessejacksondfw @aleveria @LouWSytsma

Courtroom shock as Diddy's legal team announces they won't call a single witness in his federal trial. We break down what this bold move could mean for the defense — and what's coming next as the case barrels toward closing arguments. Hosts: Jason Beckerman & Derek Kaufman Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The saga surrounding whether cameras would be present in the courtroom for Bryan Kohberger's trial was somewhat put to bed yesterday during Kohberger's appearance in front of Judge Judge.On the agenda, along with Bryan Kohbergers request to stay the proceedings and have his indictment tossed out, was the question about cameras in the courtroom and if they should stay and remain present throughout the trial.Judge John Judge has ruled that the cameras WILL REMAIN but he has some rules for the media and if they don't stick to them, he reserves the right to change his ruling.This all comes after months of legal filings behind the scenes and will continue to play out until the trial.(commercial at 6:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Trial Update Raises Questions About Roommates' Testimony (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Andrew Dressel is a seasoned attorney and real estate investor who began his career as a history teacher before graduating with honors from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2008. He practiced at Boies, Schiller & Flexner before founding his own firm in 2018, focusing on commercial litigation, corporate, and securities law. In 2016, Andrew and his wife began investing in real estate, growing their portfolio to over 200 units across multiple states by 2021. He joined the Warrior program in 2023 to expand his skills and connect with top investors nationwide. Here's some of the topics we covered:    From Classroom and Courtroom to Crushing It in Real Estate How to Build Wealth Without Sacrificing Your Lifestyle Turning Setbacks into Strategy and Momentum The Secret to Tapping Into Your Unique Superpower Proven Hacks for Raising Capital Like a Pro Inside the Deal That Changed Everything in Industrial Real Estate What Made This Opportunity Too Good to Pass Up Must-Know Advice for Anyone Ready to Jump into Real Estate Investing If you'd like to apply to the warrior program and do deals with other rockstars in this business: Text crush to 72345 and we'll be speaking soon. For more about Rod and his real estate investing journey go to www.rodkhleif.com

Send us a textFairfax criminal defense lawyer Jonathan Katz daily practices the martial art of taijiquan / t'ai chi ch'uan Yang style short form, also known as Cheng Man Ch'ing (CMC) taijiquan form. This episode introduces our third taijiquan teacher, after previously introducing you to Jon Katz's vitally important teacher Julian Chu (a student of CMC senior student Benjamin Pang Jeng Lo, several of whose weekend training classes Jon has attended), and Len Kennedy, who is one of two lawyers who has inspired Jon on the taijiquan path. Taijiquan is vitally important to Jon. Courtroom defense is war, and Jon's regular taijiquan form and sparring (push hands / sensing hands) practice is just the thing to enable him to find calm in the eye of the courtroom storm, so as to keep his eye on the prize of pursuing his clients' best defense. Sifu William C. Phillips is one of CMC's junior students, and among the youngest to receive permission from CMC to teach taijiquan. Bill is among the small number of CMC's student who have written about him and his taijiquan. Bill's first book is In the Presence of Cheng Man-Ch'ing- My Life and Lessons With the Master of Five Excellences. Bill's second book is due out this year. This Beat the Prosecution episode explores the essence of CMC beyond what has already been written about him, and the further essence of Bill -- who also has advanced in several other martial arts -- beyond what is already available. Bill grew up with street fights, stumbled into a love of judo in college, and from the judo studio director learned about CMC, and the rest is history. Bill declines an invitation to speak much about how criminal defense lawyers can come closer to beating the prosecution, but he actually says it all for himself in this interview: Learn and apply taijiquan. Be patient. Be compassionate (I add to be compassionate without sacrificing the interests of the defendant, nor the fighter's firepower). Fight for justice. Practice daily. Stay true to your practice. Deeply thanking and bowing to Sifu Bill Phillips for joining this podcast episode.This podcast episode is also on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnAD5GGZi90 and Apple podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/winning-with-full-martial-firepower-sifu-bill-phillips/id1721413675?i=1000713682983This podcast with Fairfax, Virginia criminal / DUI lawyer Jon Katz is playable on all devices at podcast.BeatTheProsecution.com. For more information, visit https://KatzJustice.com or contact us at info@KatzJustice.com, 703-383-1100 (calling), or 571-406-7268 (text). If you like what you hear on our Beat the Prosecution podcast, please take a moment to post a review at our Apple podcasts page (with stars only, or else also with a comment) at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/beat-the-prosecution/id1721413675

Do you feel your prayers are not being answered?In this episode of the Curt Landry Podcast, Rabbi Curt and Darrell Puckett talk about how to identify and overcome prayer blockers. In moments where our prayers are going unanswered, it's easy to make agreements with the enemy and grow in resentment. God is not ignoring you–there is something in the way, and He wants to reveal it to you! Prayers can be blocked by:Unforgiveness OffensesSpiritual strongholdsJoin Rabbi and Darrell as they share stories and testimonies of getting to the root of an issue, and the distinction between knowing something is blocking your prayers versus waiting on God's timing.

The legal landscape in Canada continues to evolve with significant implications for sexual assault cases, courtroom procedures, and sentencing guidelines.A groundbreaking Supreme Court of Canada decision has overturned a British Columbia sexual assault conviction in a case where prosecutors introduced evidence about the complainant's sexual inexperience without proper screening. The Court established that "sexual inactivity evidence" – including statements about virginity or lack of sexual interest – must face the same strict admissibility standards as evidence about past sexual activity. This landmark ruling recognizes that just as past consent doesn't imply present consent, past abstinence doesn't imply present non-consent. The decision extends protections against "twin myth reasoning" to both sides of the courtroom, requiring voir dire hearings whenever either Crown or defence wishes to introduce evidence about sexual history or the lack thereof.Meanwhile, the BC Supreme Court has issued a fascinating new practice direction on witness oaths and affirmations. While the Bible remains available in courtrooms, witnesses wishing to swear upon other religious or cultural items must now bring their own. The directive specifically addresses concerns about ceremonial practices that might compromise courtroom "dignity, decorum and/or safety" – a provision likely influenced by historical oath ceremonies involving chicken beheadings, candle-burning rituals, saucer-smashing, and other culturally-specific practices. This raises profound questions about the continued relevance of religious declarations in modern court proceedings and whether simply affirming to tell the truth might better serve justice.The courts also clarified the binding nature of joint submissions in a manslaughter case involving a man whose push led to his girlfriend's accidental fatal fall from a cliff. The BC Court of Appeal emphasized that judges cannot "tinker" with sentencing agreements between prosecution and defence unless they would "bring the administration of justice into disrepute." This high threshold protects the plea bargaining system that keeps our courts functioning. These cases collectively demonstrate how Canadian courts continue to balance procedural fairness, cultural sensitivity, and practical administration of justice in an evolving society. Subscribe to hear more analysis of pivotal legal developments that shape our justice system and reflect our changing social values.Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

In Dedham, Massachusetts Karen Read's supporters gather outside the courthouse as the verdict is read. In a suburb of Charleston, SC, the retrial of a jeweler accused of killing his wife is stopped in its tracks.  Plus, an update in the upcoming trial of children's author, Kouri Richins. And how to avoid tariff scams.Find out more about the cases covered each week here:www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com

Worlds best farter causes a court room stink full 2174 Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:12:59 +0000 5dDfUWU7c0jA6P7zEDNNJ4PmKYhQexbt news The Dana & Parks Podcast news Worlds best farter causes a court room stink You wanted it... Now here it is! Listen to each hour of the Dana & Parks Show whenever and wherever you want! © 2025 Audacy, Inc. News False https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?feed-link

In Dedham, Massachusetts Karen Read's supporters gather outside the courthouse as the verdict is read. In a suburb of Charleston, SC, the retrial of a jeweler accused of killing his wife is stopped in its tracks. Plus, an update in the upcoming trial of children's author, Kouri Richins. And how to avoid tariff scams.Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com

Do you feel your prayers are not being answered?In this episode of the Curt Landry Podcast, Rabbi Curt and Darrell Puckett talk about how to identify and overcome prayer blockers. In moments where our prayers are going unanswered, it's easy to make agreements with the enemy and grow in resentment. God is not ignoring you–there is something in the way, and He wants to reveal it to you! Prayers can be blocked by:Unforgiveness OffensesSpiritual strongholdsJoin Rabbi and Darrell as they share stories and testimonies of getting to the root of an issue, and the distinction between knowing something is blocking your prayers versus waiting on God's timing.

Do you feel your prayers are not being answered? In this episode of the Curt Landry Podcast, Rabbi Curt and Darrell Puckett talk about how to identify and overcome prayer blockers. In moments where our prayers are going unanswered, it's easy to make agreements with the enemy and grow in resentment. God is not ignoring you–there is something in the way, and He wants to reveal it to you! Prayers can be blocked by: Unforgiveness Offenses Spiritual strongholds Join Rabbi and Darrell as they share stories and testimonies of getting to the root of an issue, and the distinction between knowing something is blocking your prayers versus waiting on God's timing.

LA Live: Bee takes out a Billionaire; Trump vs Tucker Carlson; Viral courtroom videos full 1252 Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:38:48 +0000 KsF25il7eSVkZMuWEBG6uMqLKF1UErBu trump,viral,trending,sports GBag Nation trump,viral,trending,sports LA Live: Bee takes out a Billionaire; Trump vs Tucker Carlson; Viral courtroom videos The G-Bag Nation - Weekdays 10am-3pm 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False https:/

Have you ever witnessed a complete miscarriage of justice? The trial of Jesus stands as history's most profound example of how power, jealousy, and fear can corrupt even the most sacred institutions.As the high priest grows increasingly frustrated with contradicting testimonies against Jesus, he finally asks directly: "Are you the Christ [Messiah], the Son of the Blessed One?" Jesus's unflinching response—"I am"—provides exactly what they wanted: grounds for execution. The high priest tears his garments (itself a violation of Levitical law) and declares no further witnesses necessary. What follows reveals the cruelty behind religious facades as guards blindfold Jesus, beat him mercilessly, and mockingly challenge him to "prophesy" who struck him.Meanwhile, Peter's story unfolds in heartbreaking parallel. The disciple who hours earlier had sworn he would die before denying Jesus now crumbles before a servant girl's questioning. His three denials culminate in cursing and swearing that he "does not know this man." When the rooster crows and Jesus catches his eye across the courtyard, Peter breaks down in bitter tears. Yet this failure doesn't define his story—Jesus later restores him completely, showing that our worst moments don't disqualify us from God's purposes.The religious leaders, having condemned Jesus for blasphemy, shrewdly change tactics when bringing him before Pilate. Knowing Roman authorities wouldn't execute someone for religious claims, they reframe the charges as sedition: "This man claims to be a king." Throughout these manipulated proceedings, Jesus maintains remarkable composure, speaking only when necessary and embracing the path that leads to our redemption.This ancient narrative mirrors how both secular authorities and religious establishments often deny Christian faith a fair hearing today. The world doesn't understand the profound importance of what happened that day—when the truly innocent One willingly accepted judgment so that we might go free.How might your perspective change knowing that Jesus faced injustice so completely yet without abandoning His mission of love? What does it mean that He doesn't discard us when we fail him like Peter did?Support the showThank you for listening!! Please give us a five-star rating to help your podcast provider's algorithm spread RTTB among their listeners. You can find free study and leader resources at the following link - Resource Page - Reasoning Through the Bible Please prayerfully consider supporting RTTB to help us to continue providing content and free resources. You can do that at this link - Support RTTB - Reasoning Through the Bible May God Bless you!! - Glenn and Steve

Courtroom chaos continues at Sean “Diddy” Combs’s federal trial as Judge Subramanian dismisses two jury members—one for lying about his residency and another for discussing case details outside court—triggering defense objections and concerns about fairness. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Juror #6—a 41‑year‑old Black man—was dismissed on June 16, 2025, by Judge Arun Subramanian after it emerged that he had provided conflicting information about his residence. During jury selection, he stated he lived in the Bronx, but later told court staff he had moved to New Jersey—making him potentially ineligible for the Manhattan federal jury. The judge cited serious concerns over his candor and credibility, noting that these inconsistencies might suggest he “shaded answers to get on, and stay on” the jury.Combs's defense objected to the removal, arguing that dismissing one of only two Black men on the panel—and replacing him with a white male alternate—would compromise racial diversity and prejudice Combs. But Judge Subramanian emphasized that the decision was based solely on honesty and eligibility, stating that allowing the juror to remain “would be improper” if race were the motive. He noted the need to uphold the integrity of the process and maintain trust in juror credibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy trial faces jury issues as experts question no sequestration | Fox News

Anna and Raven talk about the unspoken rules of standing ovations and create their own rules for when enough is enough! Sunjay Kapur, Indian Billionaire, died by swallowing a bee while playing Polo and it reminded Anna of a fear from a movie that had a similar plot! There are some movies that instill fear on you forever! Madonna and Pope Leo are distant cousins and is related to many other A-List celebrities! Anna has a claim to fame; find out who is related to her! This past Friday Kayne West showed up to P Diddy's trial! Anna and Raven ask you what the top 5 people you don't want at your court date! Are you up to date on this week's biggest news story? Anna and Raven will get you caught up on the trending news stories including the influx of European tourism, the FBI urging people not to respond to the toll text message scams, and the return of Joey Chestnut! Raven goes head-to-head with Valedictorians in Can't Beat Raven: Valedictorian Edition! Find out who will win! Will he beat Jesus or Kaitlyn? Dakota Johnson said in an interview that guys that wear bracelets give her the ick. What do you think guys shouldn't wear?! Lisa's co-worker invited her to her wedding. Lisa wants to go to support her, but her husband, doesn't want to go. He says he doesn't know her (Lisa barely knows her) and he already had told his friends he would hang out with them. Lisa says that being married is always being the “plus one”, even for events you don't want to go to. He says that it's no big deal if she brings one her female friends as a date. What do you think? Josh and Allison have a chance to win $800! All they have to do is answer more pop culture questions than Raven in Can't Beat Raven!    

Juror #6—a 41‑year‑old Black man—was dismissed on June 16, 2025, by Judge Arun Subramanian after it emerged that he had provided conflicting information about his residence. During jury selection, he stated he lived in the Bronx, but later told court staff he had moved to New Jersey—making him potentially ineligible for the Manhattan federal jury. The judge cited serious concerns over his candor and credibility, noting that these inconsistencies might suggest he “shaded answers to get on, and stay on” the jury.Combs's defense objected to the removal, arguing that dismissing one of only two Black men on the panel—and replacing him with a white male alternate—would compromise racial diversity and prejudice Combs. But Judge Subramanian emphasized that the decision was based solely on honesty and eligibility, stating that allowing the juror to remain “would be improper” if race were the motive. He noted the need to uphold the integrity of the process and maintain trust in juror credibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy trial faces jury issues as experts question no sequestration | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

On this episode of Badlands Daily, CannCon and Ashe in America open with a live report from Denver, where Ashe is covering the Lindell v. Coomer trial. She breaks down dramatic in-court developments, including a denied motion to dismiss, the strategic absence of key witnesses, and the media's conspicuous silence on what could be a landmark case. The conversation then widens to lawfare on all fronts, Trump's federal immigration crackdown and Gavin Newsom's pushback, the weaponization of law through state lawsuits, and the coordinated resistance to accountability. CannCon and Ashe also tackle recent viral clips and headlines, from Kamala Harris's latest optics failure to Elon Musk's cryptic tweets and the cultural backlash against regime narratives. With first-hand reporting, sharp legal insight, and political analysis, this episode highlights the shifting ground beneath the establishment's feet, and the American public's growing refusal to look away.

More developing news from day 22 of the Diddy trial with “Jane” finally back on the stand for more cross examination after a two hour delay that had both sides going in and out of the Judge’s chambers. Was it about the juror the prosecution wants kicked out, was it about “Jane’s” expected testimony? Diddy’s ex was extremely emotional on the stand Wednesday, reading texts about her love for him, calling him “truly a blessing” in her life.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More developing news from day 22 of the Diddy trial with “Jane” finally back on the stand for more cross examination after a two hour delay that had both sides going in and out of the Judge’s chambers. Was it about the juror the prosecution wants kicked out, was it about “Jane’s” expected testimony? Diddy’s ex was extremely emotional on the stand Wednesday, reading texts about her love for him, calling him “truly a blessing” in her life.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More developing news from day 22 of the Diddy trial with “Jane” finally back on the stand for more cross examination after a two hour delay that had both sides going in and out of the Judge’s chambers. Was it about the juror the prosecution wants kicked out, was it about “Jane’s” expected testimony? Diddy’s ex was extremely emotional on the stand Wednesday, reading texts about her love for him, calling him “truly a blessing” in her life.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

(Episode Character: London Pella) London is forced to think about the scariest day of her life. Today's Bible Verse: Psalm 3Author: Judith DeStefano / Music: Michael DeStefano / Cover Art: Pamela Bredehoft Smith Support the show

Karen Read Trial Day 30-SUV vs. Fall: Today's Courtroom Clash  Today's courtroom events marked a significant turning point in the Karen Read trial, highlighting the prosecution's compelling evidence and further exposing the flaws in the defense's theories. The defense began the day by again attempting to secure a mistrial, citing supposed confusion around evidence related to holes in John O'Keefe's sweatshirt. Judge Beverly Cannone swiftly dismissed the mistrial request, clarifying to the jury that the holes were indeed caused by evidence processing rather than violence during the incident—neutralizing the defense's complaint decisively. In another setback for Karen Read, the defense revisited their controversial dog-bite theory, only to have it swiftly rejected by Judge Cannone once more. Defense attorney Alan Jackson's insistence that the wounds on O'Keefe's arm were dog-inflicted rather than vehicle-related was shut down definitively, emphasizing the limitations of their forensic expert, Dr. Elizabeth Laposata. This ongoing refusal underscores the defense's desperate reliance on theories that lack credible scientific backing. Dr. Laposata's testimony itself faced immediate scrutiny, especially after the prosecution exposed troubling details about her past performance as Rhode Island's chief medical examiner. Prosecutor Hank Brennan meticulously highlighted previous audits criticizing her professional reliability, casting significant doubt on her testimony that O'Keefe's injuries might have come from a backward fall. This damaging revelation dramatically undercut the defense's credibility and potentially their entire forensic narrative. Later, biomechanical expert Dr. Andrew Rentschler attempted to challenge the prosecution's core assertion linking Read's SUV to O'Keefe's fatal injuries. However, his arguments faltered significantly under aggressive cross-examination by the prosecution, who successfully emphasized the overwhelming forensic evidence previously presented—evidence that consistently points directly to Karen Read's vehicle as the source of the fatal impact. The jury's observations today clearly revealed the fragile nature of Karen Read's defense strategy. The defense team consistently resorted to complicated hypothetical scenarios rather than confronting the solid forensic evidence and eyewitness testimonies already laid out by prosecutors. As the trial approaches its conclusion, the prosecution's straightforward and methodically supported narrative continues to stand in sharp contrast to the convoluted and increasingly disjointed defense theories. Stay engaged with this critical trial as the prosecution reinforces its narrative with further compelling testimony. Every piece of evidence brought forward from here will have significant implications for the final verdict, ultimately deciding justice for John O'Keefe. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimeTrial #CourtroomDrama #DefenseExposed #ForensicEvidence #LegalNews #TrialUpdate #JusticeForJohn #CrimeSceneAnalysis    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Karen Read Trial Day 30-SUV vs. Fall: Today's Courtroom Clash  Today's courtroom events marked a significant turning point in the Karen Read trial, highlighting the prosecution's compelling evidence and further exposing the flaws in the defense's theories. The defense began the day by again attempting to secure a mistrial, citing supposed confusion around evidence related to holes in John O'Keefe's sweatshirt. Judge Beverly Cannone swiftly dismissed the mistrial request, clarifying to the jury that the holes were indeed caused by evidence processing rather than violence during the incident—neutralizing the defense's complaint decisively. In another setback for Karen Read, the defense revisited their controversial dog-bite theory, only to have it swiftly rejected by Judge Cannone once more. Defense attorney Alan Jackson's insistence that the wounds on O'Keefe's arm were dog-inflicted rather than vehicle-related was shut down definitively, emphasizing the limitations of their forensic expert, Dr. Elizabeth Laposata. This ongoing refusal underscores the defense's desperate reliance on theories that lack credible scientific backing. Dr. Laposata's testimony itself faced immediate scrutiny, especially after the prosecution exposed troubling details about her past performance as Rhode Island's chief medical examiner. Prosecutor Hank Brennan meticulously highlighted previous audits criticizing her professional reliability, casting significant doubt on her testimony that O'Keefe's injuries might have come from a backward fall. This damaging revelation dramatically undercut the defense's credibility and potentially their entire forensic narrative. Later, biomechanical expert Dr. Andrew Rentschler attempted to challenge the prosecution's core assertion linking Read's SUV to O'Keefe's fatal injuries. However, his arguments faltered significantly under aggressive cross-examination by the prosecution, who successfully emphasized the overwhelming forensic evidence previously presented—evidence that consistently points directly to Karen Read's vehicle as the source of the fatal impact. The jury's observations today clearly revealed the fragile nature of Karen Read's defense strategy. The defense team consistently resorted to complicated hypothetical scenarios rather than confronting the solid forensic evidence and eyewitness testimonies already laid out by prosecutors. As the trial approaches its conclusion, the prosecution's straightforward and methodically supported narrative continues to stand in sharp contrast to the convoluted and increasingly disjointed defense theories. Stay engaged with this critical trial as the prosecution reinforces its narrative with further compelling testimony. Every piece of evidence brought forward from here will have significant implications for the final verdict, ultimately deciding justice for John O'Keefe. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimeTrial #CourtroomDrama #DefenseExposed #ForensicEvidence #LegalNews #TrialUpdate #JusticeForJohn #CrimeSceneAnalysis    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In Massachusetts, tension on the witness stand as Karen Read's defense team makes its case for a second time. Dateline correspondent Josh Mankiewicz shares updates on the case of Michigan grandmother Dee Ann Warner ahead of her husband's murder trial. And a courtroom sketch artist covering the Sean Combs trial on capturing what cameras can't. Find out more about the cases covered each week here:www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com