POPULARITY
6 episodes with fcms
7 episodes with fcms
2 episodes with fcms
2 episodes with fcms
4 episodes with fcms
5 episodes with fcms
4 episodes with fcms
3 episodes with fcms
3 episodes with fcms
Nedtakt fra toppen af tabellen:Fortjent sejr Vild FCK ugeModen præstationHvem shinede for FCK? FCK fået et nyt våbenVi håndterede FCMs dødbolde perfektPartner: Unibet - der altid har de højeste odds på FCK Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Nedtakt fra toppen af tabellen:Fortjent sejr Vild FCK ugeModen præstationHvem shinede for FCK? FCK fået et nyt våbenVi håndterede FCMs dødbolde perfektPartner: Unibet - der altid har de højeste odds på FCK Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Velkommen til Flagskibet - Sort Snak magasin om Europa, hvor vi følger Midtjylland i det europæiske farvand i sæsonen 2024/25, hvor ulvene er den danske klub, der viser flaget frem på de største scener og dermed dansk fodbolds europæiske flagskib I denne udsendelse ser vi tilbage på 2-0 nederlaget til Porto i 6 spillerunde af ELs ligaspil, der var FCMs 3. nederlag i træk i turneringen. Derfor kan man nok med rette sige, at Flagskibet tager vand ind, og er ude i lidt voldsomt vejr, som også betød at to mand er røget over bord, herunder vores normale passager Niels Lodberg. Det betyder, at det bliver en lidt anderledes sejlads i dag, hvor vi vender trænerrokaden og ser på de lidt større europæiske linjer her efter 6 ud af 8 spillerunder. Noget der ikke er forandret, er at vi som altid kårer Rundens Rømer og Isaksen med hjælp fra lytterne Vært: Kent Nielsen Panel: Lars Noe Lauridsen & Ryan Svale Andersen Tidskoder: 00:03:15 Trænerrokaden 00:25:02 Porto-kampen 00:42:24 Rundens Rømer og Isaksen 00:49:52 Status over ligafasen 01:07:55 Fremkig mod Ludogorets Tak til alle lyttere for at lytte, give feedback og komme med indspark til udsendelser. Den største tak til medlemmerne af Sort Support for at gøre det muligt at lave Sort Snak. Husk, at du kan blive medlem af Sort Support på sortsnakpodcast.dk/sort-support/
Joe's Premium Subscription: www.standardgrain.comGrain Markets and Other Stuff Links-Apple PodcastsSpotifyTikTokYouTubeFutures and options trading involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.0:00 CME is an FCM4:05 Soybeans and FND6:30 Corn Belt Rains Return7:36 China Stimulus Details8:39 Gold ATH10:00 Bitcoin RallyHere's the latest update on the CME's new futures commission merchant, market conditions, and key economic developments!
I denne episode af Sort Snak taler vi om sejren over AaB - For hvor komfortabel var den sejr egentlig? Hvad med vores udtryk - ser vi bedre ud? Og hvad siger vi til sæsonstarten i forhold til vores konkurrenter? Når vi har haft AaB-sejren under lup, så skal vi selvfølgelig slynge fyringer og forlængelser afsted efter top- og bund på formbarometeret. I anden halvleg taler vi om forlængelsen af Thomas Thomasberg, og så skal vi se frem mod en vigtig europæisk aften mod de ungarske mestre fra Ferencvaros sammen med FCMs head of performance analysis, Søren Bjerg. Gæster: Nicolaj Bruun Rasmussen, Rune Thyboe Vejersø og Søren Bjerg, FCM. Vært: Thomas Schouv Jakobsen Tidskoder: 00:12:48: Analyse af AaB 00:54:33: Fyringer & Forlængelser 01:04:13: TTs forlængelser 01:13:28: Optakt Ferencvaros med Søren Bjerg Tak til Rene Skov for musik og teknisk assistance. Tak til alle lyttere - for at lytte, give feedback og komme med indspark til udsendelser. Og tak til medlemmerne af Sort Support for at gøre det endnu sjovere at lave Sort Snak. Husk, at du kan blive medlem af Sort Support på https://sortsnakpodcast.dk/sort-support/ Find os på Facebook og X som sortsnakpodcast.
Vi fjoller i denne uge med Ryan Giggs' kærlighedsdigte, med FCMs guldmedaljer, med CL finalen, med Matt O'Riley og Fodboldbanko og alt muligt andet. Og så er der vælgerhold. Lyt lige med!!!
Vi fjoller i denne uge med Ryan Giggs' kærlighedsdigte, med FCMs guldmedaljer, med CL finalen, med Matt O'Riley og Fodboldbanko og alt muligt andet. Og så er der vælgerhold. Lyt lige med!!!
Episode 160: Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care. Future Dr. Manophinives explains the present and future of AI in diagnosing and treating diseases. Written by Rosalynn Manophinives, MS-IV, American University of the Caribbean. Editing by Hector Arreaza, MD.You are listening to Rio Bravo qWeek Podcast, your weekly dose of knowledge brought to you by the Rio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program from Bakersfield, California, a UCLA-affiliated program sponsored by Clinica Sierra Vista, Let Us Be Your Healthcare Home. This podcast was created for educational purposes only. Visit your primary care provider for additional medical advice.Today, we embark on an intriguing journey at the crossroads of technology and healthcare: The Future of Healthcare in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). Let's start by establishing the groundwork for AI and ML. Artificial Intelligence involves machines mirroring cognitive functions like learning and problem-solving, while machine learning empowers machines to learn from data and refine their capabilities over time. In healthcare, these technologies aim to elevate diagnostic precision and treatment effectiveness which are pivotal aspects in primary care medicine.Accurate diagnosis is the cornerstone of effective patient care in all forms of medicine because an accurate diagnosis guides treatment decisions and influences patient outcomes. This is why the integration of AI and ML holds immense promise in this field.Section 1: AI in Diagnostic Assistance (4 mins)Let's explore how AI utilizes algorithms to analyze extensive datasets, enhancing diagnostic accuracy significantly.AI serves as a revolutionary force in analyzing a large amount of data, particularly in medical imaging. Imagine AI algorithms as super brains, employing machine learning to decipher intricate details from X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans. Notably, studies have demonstrated their precision matching and even surpassing that of human experts. For instance, research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed AI algorithms outperforming radiologists in detecting conditions like breast cancer.AI's skills extend beyond images. It digs into genetic information, medical history, and treatment outcomes, acting as a detective to spot patterns, predict responses, and customize interventions. Studies support this, showcasing AI models outperforming dermatologists in diagnosing skin cancer from images. Will AI replace doctors?The beauty of AI is that it does not replace doctors but acts as a super investigator in your healthcare corner, expediting diagnoses, and refining treatments. So, AI isn't merely accelerating processes; it's enhancing healthcare outcomes, making diagnoses quicker, and treatments more precise, and minimizing errors. The future appears very promising with AI leading the way to more precise and tailored healthcare.Section 2: Case Studies in Diagnosis (4 mins):Help in research: Let's delve into real-life examples of AI in action, further amplifying diagnostic accuracy. In a research study, Rajkomar and collaborators crafted an AI algorithm predicting patient deterioration within hours, leveraging electronic health record data. This tool allowed for proactive care, identifying potential issues before they escalated. Taking it up a notch, Aliper and collaborators compared AI to human researchers, resulting in AI outsmarting human brains in designing drugs targeting age-related diseases. These experiments underscore AI's potential in diagnostics, from catching issues early to designing groundbreaking drugs.AI here enhances doctors' capabilities and acts as an additional set of eyes, boosting their superpowers, spotting nuances, and proposing game-changing solutions in medicine.Section 3: AI in Risk Prediction (4 mins):Let's shift our focus to AI's role in predicting risks and prognosis, particularly in conditions like COPD.AI employs sophisticated algorithms to analyze patient data comprehensively, including demographics, hospital visits, diagnoses, prescribed medications, and lab results. In COPD, AI not only predicts mortality but also anticipates hospital readmissions for respiratory issues or flare-ups. By scrutinizing various markers, AI resembles Sherlock Holmes, unraveling clues within data.And AI doesn't stop there, AI integrates risk predictions into medical practices, which fosters personalized care tailored to individual risk factors. A study led by Choi and their team analyzed retrospective patient data and they were able to identify individuals at risk of undiagnosed COPD, emphasizing the significance of catching potential issues early, finding those who might slip through the cracks otherwise, which is huge! Section 4: AI in Treatment Planning (4 mins):Let's now explore how AI is revolutionizing treatment planning within medicine.AI, equipped with machine learning algorithms, tailors treatments by analyzing patient-specific data and medical history. In cancer, for example, AI analyzes biopsy images and quantifies biomarkers, facilitating personalized treatments. Beyond cancer, AI extends its reach to cell therapies, predicting their effectiveness through genomic information and drug responses.And here's the techie part: AI employs various smart algorithms like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) to provide personalized treatment recommendations. It's like having personalized treatment recommendations by experts that fit you like a glove, catering to individual needs. Section 5: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Reduction of Medical Errors (4 mins):Lastly, let me tell you about the impact of AI-driven treatment planning, specifically in reducing medical errors. Imagine this—medical decisions? They're tough. Sifting through tons of data, inaccessible medical records, physicians' lack of experience, and loads of conflicting info, makes the decision often not crystal clear. This is where a high percentage of medical errors occur, which is where Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) come in. FCMs are like a super-smart tool that mimics human reasoning, tackling the messiness of medical data with grace.FCMs are all about modeling complex systems, by combining fuzzy logic and neural networks, just like our brain does—connecting the dots between concepts and their cause-and-effect relationships. From patient records to test results, they make sense of it all.And FCM is not just theory—FCMs are the real deal and they're not the newbies in town; they've been around for a while, evolving from their early days. They've proven their worth in various medical areas too – in radiotherapy planning, diagnosing language impairments, and even in grading tumors!So, in a nutshell, FCMs are useful tools for medical decision support by taking on the complexities of diagnosing and treatment planning.Closing:In conclusion, the integration of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in healthcare is a thrilling frontier, offering invaluable tools to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. As we evolve, responsible use of these advances is paramount, ensuring they optimize rather than replace the indispensable human touch in healthcare.Thank you for joining me in exploring the future of healthcare in AI and Machine Learning. I trust this discussion has sparked curiosity and appreciation for the transformative potential of technology in healthcare. -----------------------------------Conclusion: Now we conclude episode number 160, “Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care.” This is a new and somewhat unknown field of medicine that is rapidly evolving these days. Future Dr. Manophinives explained that AI and ML can be a useful tool in the diagnosis of diseases by, for example, interpreting images accurately. AI also can help develop plans of care by interpreting large amounts of complex data and predicting trends, possible complications, and the effectiveness of multiple treatments. Keep your eyes and mind wide open to learn more about this advancing technology that will continue to support our efforts to bring health and well-being to our communities.This week we thank Hector Arreaza and Rosalynn Manophinives. Audio editing by Adrianne Silva.Even without trying, every night you go to bed a little wiser. Thanks for listening to Rio Bravo qWeek Podcast. We want to hear from you, send us an email at RioBravoqWeek@clinicasierravista.org, or visit our website riobravofmrp.org/qweek. See you next week! _____________________References:Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216-1219. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1606181. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070532/.Rajkomar, Alvin, et al. "Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records." npj Digital Medicine, 08 May 2018. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-018-0029-1Choi, Ellen, et al. "Retrospective analysis of real-world data to identify patients at risk for undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease." PLoS ONE, 2020.Choi, Ellen, et al. "Machine Learning in Primary Care: Predicting Hospitalizations and Critical Events." AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2018.Beam AL, Kohane IS. Translating Artificial Intelligence Into Clinical Care. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2368-2369. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17217. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27898974/Johnson, Kipp W., et al. "Automated Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Generation for Supporting Clinical Decisions in Primary Care." IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2020.Royalty-free music used for this episode: Gushito, “Gista Mista”, downloaded on November 16th, 2023, from https://www.videvo.net/
| Køb vores bedste spil i Plus: https://t.me/monetosplusbot |Superligaen begynder endelig igen, og traditionen tro fortsætter vi med Superliga Spil, hvor vi gennemgår samtlige af rundens seks kampe og giver dig en hulens masse spilforslag.I den forbindelse lægger vi ud med FCMs premierekamp mod Hvidovre, og det er en kamp, som eksperterne ikke er enige om. Det er oddset på FC Midtjylland, der volder problemer. I alt får du seks spilforslag i denne podcast.Vært: Mads Kindberg Nielsen.Eksperter: Steffen Dam og Tonni Munk Jensen.18+ | Spil ansvarligt | stopspillet.dk | ROFUS.nu |
Hvad lærer trænerne, når de går på kursus? Ensretter DBU dem? Skal de spille på samme måde? Det handler denne episode om i samtale med FCM´s Head of Coaching, Jan Knudsen med mere end 30 års erfaring som trænerudvikler, og Nickolai Lund, der nu skifter fra Viborg FF til FCK som assistenttræner. Begge er ved at færdiggøre træneruddannelsens øverste niveau, UEFA Pro License, og de kender alle trinene på uddannelsesstigen.Vi taler om udviklingen fra at lære fodboldinstrumenterne til at kunne spille sine egne melodier. Vi funderer over den hurtige udskiftning af fælles sprog, og diskuterer hvordan, man kan integrere tilegnet læring fra kurser i sin hverdagspraksis.Og så kan vi ikke undgå at tale om det igangværende Pro-kursus, hvor emnerne har været:- sportspsykologi med Carsten Hvid- fodbold og passion med Claus Meyer og Anders Agger- Motivationsteori med Helle Hein- international topfodbold med Kasper Hjulmand og Lars Søndergaard- fodboldledelse med oplæg fra Jess Thorup, Lars Friis, Jesper Fredberg, Christian Engell- fysiologi med oplæg fra Peter Krustrup, Morten Hostrup, Anders Storgaard- brug af data med oplæg fra Frans Hammer, Christian Kejser, Simon Jensen og besøg hos Brøndby IF- matchday-tema med bl.a. oplæg fra David Nielsen, oplæg om brug af VAR og om "den vigtige samtale" med Jakob Hansen- Feedback- analyse- medier- jobskifte og fyringKlubbesøg hos HB Køge med primært fokus på kvindefodbold og klubbens brug af dataKlubbesøg hos FCN med fokus på deres lifeskill- og fodboldtræningKlubbesøg FCMBesøg hos UEFA HQ i Schweiz med oplæg fra f.eks Rafa Benitez, Giovanni van Bronkhorst, Sergio Lara, Man. Citys chefanalytiker, Southamptons klubdirektør og udveksling med pro-kursister fra Island, Tjekkiet og Asserbadjan.Studieture til kvindernes EM i England med oplæg fra den danske landsholdsstab, fodboldforskere på University of St. Marys og kampobservationerStudietur til herrernes Nations League Final 4 i Holland med besøg i det hollandske fodboldforbund, PSV træningsanlæg med oplæg fra Frank Arnesen, AZ Alkmaar Individuelle studieturePraktisk træning med medierBesøg i de andres træningsmiljøer i mikrogrupper3 individuelle supervisioner- og så det allervigtigste: oplæg fra og samtaler mellem kursisterne!Produceret samarbejde med BMW Danmark og LedelseshøjskolenPostproduktion Tobias Bech ZachariassenAbonner via www.troelsbech.com - og spørg om mere ind om Ledelseshøjskolen
I denne udgave gør panelet status efter det mest skuffende og kaotiske grundspil i FCMs historie, der blev afsluttet med endnu en uforløst uafgjort i det vestlige Østjylland. Vi vender også det, der ligner en afsked med vores kaptajn, og den uafklarede trænersituation, hvor en nordmand lader til at være førsteprioritet lige nu. Vi slutter med at se frem mod en ny oplevelse, nemlig deltagelse i det såkaldte kvalifikationsspil. Vært: Kent Nielsen Panel: Rune Thyboe Vejersø og Peter Krog Tidskoder: 00:03:49 Uafgjort i Silkeborg 00:27:19 Ugens fyring og forlængelse 00:32:25 Farvel til Erik? 00:44:39 Trænersituationen 01:13:42 Nedrykningsspillet Vi takker alle, der støtter Sort Snak gennem et abonnement på https://sortsnakpodcast.10er.app/ eller gennem enkeltdonationer via Mobilepay på nr. 60-05-08.
I flew out to Chicago to interview Brett Harrison, who is the former President of FTX US President and founder of Architect.In his first longform interview since the fall of FTX, he speak in great detail about his entire tenure there and about SBF's dysfunctional leadership. He talks about how the inner circle of Gary Wang, Nishad Singh, and SBF mismanaged the company, controlled the codebase, got distracted by media, and even threatened him for his letter of resignation.In what was my favorite part of the interview, we also discuss his insights about the financial system from his decades of experience in the world's largest HFT firms.And we talk about Brett's new startup, Architect, as well as the general state of crypto post-FTX.After talking with Brett for 3 hours, I found him to be extremely intelligent, thoughtful, and ethical.Watch on YouTube. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or any other podcast platform. Read the full transcript here. Follow me on Twitter for updates on future episodes.Similar episodesSide note: Paying the billsTo help pay the bills for my podcast, I've turned on paid subscriptions on Substack.No major content will be paywalled - please don't donate if you have to think twice before buying a cup of coffee.But if you have the means & have enjoyed my podcast, I would appreciate your support
3-0 er den farligste føring! Det beviste Ulvene fra Midtjylland endnu engang da de for anden uge i streg smed en 3-0 føring, mod et oprykkerhold. Imens er der intet nyt om deres jagt på en ny træner, og det falder ikke i god jord hos panelet.I FCK er sæddet varmt under Jess Thorup, der skal klargøre Løverne til deres Champions League brag mod Trabzonspor. Er Patrik Carlgren Superligaens bedste målmand og er OB til grin i Superligaen? Spørgsmålene er mange, men du får svarene i Danmarks skarpeste fodbolddebatpodcast LIGE PÅ.LIGE PÅ har fået nye udgivelsestidspunkt og vil fremover blive frigivet kl. 05.00 mandag morgen, så du kan blive helt opdateret på superligarunden inden morgenmaden!Podcasten er betalt og sponseret af Discovery+ og MobilePay, der gør det let for dig at holde styr på dit holds bødekasse med MobilePay Box. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hvem bør Ulvene hente til posten som cheftræner? Lasse Fosgaard argumenterer for David Nielsen, hvorimod Jesper C hiver en joker frem i FCKs assistenttræner Jacob Neestrup. Hvem elsker ikke en god penis-transfer?Lasse Fosgaard, Sandro Spasojevic og Jesper Christiansen debatterer Superligaens runde 3; i denne uge med et særligt fokus på FCK og FCMs trænersædder.Der er trænerdebat, fodboldquiz, Tivoligate og bødekassesnak, i Danmarks skarpeste fodbolddebatprogram.Denne podcast er betalt og sponsoreret af MobilePay, der gør det let for dig at holde styr på dit holds bødekasse med MobilePay Box. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
I flew to the Bahamas to interview Sam Bankman-Fried, the CEO of FTX! He talks about FTX’s plan to infiltrate traditional finance, giving $100m this year to AI + pandemic risk, scaling slowly + hiring A-players, and much more.Watch on YouTube, or listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or any other podcast platform. Read the full transcript here. Follow me on Twitter for updates on future episodes.Timestamps(00:18) - How inefficient is the world?(01:11) - Choosing a career(04:15) - The difficulty of being a founder(06:21) - Is effective altruism too narrowminded?(09:57) - Political giving(12:55) - FTX Future Fund(16:41) - Adverse selection in philanthropy(18:06) - Correlation between different causes(22:15) - Great founders do difficult things(25:51) - Pitcher fatigue and the importance of focus(28:30) - How SBF identifies talent(31:09) - Why scaling too fast kills companies(33:51) - The future of crypto(35:46) - Risk, efficiency, and human discretion in derivatives(41:00) - Jane Street vs FTX(41:56) - Conflict of interest between broker and exchange(42:59) - Bahamas and Charter Cities(43:47) - SBF’s RAM-skewed mindUnfortunately, audio quality abruptly drops from 17:50-19:15TranscriptDwarkesh Patel 0:09Today on The Lunar Science Society Podcast, I have the pleasure of interviewing Sam Bankman-Fried, CEO of FTX. Thanks for coming on The Lunar Society.Sam Bankman-Fried 0:17Thanks for having me.How inefficient is the world?Dwarkesh Patel 0:18Alright, first question. Does the consecutive success of FTX and Alameda suggest to you that the world has all kinds of low-hanging opportunities? Or was that a property of the inefficiencies of crypto markets at one particular point in history?Sam Bankman-Fried 0:31I think it's more of the former, there are just a lot of inefficiencies.Dwarkesh Patel 0:35So then another part of the question is: if you had to restart earning to give again, what are the odds you become a billionaire, but you can't do it in crypto?Sam Bankman-Fried 0:42I think they're pretty decent. A lot of it depends on what I ended up choosing and how aggressive I end up deciding to be. There were a lot of safe and secure career paths before me that definitely would not have ended there. But if I dedicated myself to starting up some businesses, there would have been a pretty decent chance of it.Choosing a careerDwarkesh Patel 1:11So that leads to the next question—which is that you've cited Will MacAskill's lunch with you while you were at MIT as being very important in deciding your career. He suggested you earn-to-give by going to a quant firm like Jane Street. In retrospect, given the success you've had as a founder, was that maybe bad advice? And maybe you should’ve been advised to start a startup or nonprofit?Sam Bankman-Fried 1:31I don't think it was literally the best possible advice because this was in 2012. Starting a crypto exchange then would have been…. I think it was definitely helpful advice. Relative to not having gotten advice at all, I think it helps quite a bit.Dwarkesh Patel 1:50Right. But then there's a broader question: are people like you who could become founders advised to take lower variance, lower risk careers that in, expected value, are less valuable?Sam Bankman-Fried 2:02Yeah, I think that's probably true. I think people are advised too strongly to go down safe career paths. But I think it's worth noting that there's a big difference between what makes sense altruistically and personally for this. To the extent you're just thinking of personal criteria, that's going to argue heavily in favor of a safer career path because you have much more quickly declining marginal utility of money than the world does. So, this kind of path is specifically for altruistically-minded people.The other thing is that when you think about advising people, I think people will often try and reference career advice that others got. “What were some of these outward-facing factors of success that you can see?” But often the answer has something to do with them and their family, friends, or something much more personal. When we talk with people about their careers, personal considerations and the advice of people close to them weigh very heavily on the decisions they end up making.Dwarkesh Patel 3:17I didn't realize that the personal considerations were as important in your case as the advice you got.Sam Bankman-Fried 3:24Oh, I don’t think in my case. But, it is true with many people that I talked to.Dwarkesh Patel 3:29Speaking of declining marginal consumption, I'm wondering if you think the implication of this is that over the long term, all the richest people in the world will be utilitarian philanthropists because they don't have diminishing returns of consumption. They’re risk-neutral.Sam Bankman-Fried 3:40I wouldn't say all will, but I think there probably is something in that direction. People who are looking at how they can help the world are going to end up being disproportionately represented amongst the most and maybe least successful.The difficulty of being a founderDwarkesh Patel 3:54Alright, let’s talk about Effective Altruism. So in your interview with Tyler Cowen, you were asked, “What constrains the number of altruistically minded projects?” And you answered, “Probably someone who can start something.”Now, is this a property of the world in general? Or is this a property of EAs? And if it's about EAs, then is there something about the movement that drives away people who took could take leadership roles?Sam Bankman-Fried 4:15Oh, I think it's just the world in general. Even if you ignore altruistic projects and just look at profit-minded ones, we have lots of ideas for businesses that we think would probably do well, if they were run well, that we'd be excited to fund. And the missing ingredient quite frequently for them is the right person or team to take the lead on it. In general, starting something is brutal. It's brutal being a founder, and it requires a somewhat specific but extensive list of skills. Those things end up making it high in demand.Dwarkesh Patel 4:56What would it take to get more of those kinds of people to go into EA?Sam Bankman-Fried 4:59Part of it is probably just talking with them about, “Have you thought about what you can do for the world? Have you thought about how you can have an impact on the world? Have you thought about how you can maximize your impact on the world?” Many people would be excited about thinking critically and ambitiously about how they can help the world. So I think honestly, just engagement is one piece of this. And then even within people who are altruistically minded and thinking about what it would take for them to be founders, there are still things that you can do.Some of this is about empowering people and some of this is about normalizing the fact that when you start something, it might fail—and that's okay. Most startups and especially very early-stage startups should not be trying to maximize the chances of having at least a little bit of success. But that means you have to be okay with the personal fallout of failing and that we have to build a community that is okay with that. I don't think we have that right now, I think very few communities do.Is effective altruism too narrowminded?Dwarkesh Patel 6:21Now, there are many good objections to utilitarianism, as you know. You said yourself that we don't have a good account of infinite ethics—should we attribute substantial weight to the probability that utilitarianism is wrong? And how do you hedge for this moral uncertainty in your giving?Sam Bankman-Fried 6:35So I don't think it has a super large impact on my giving. Partially, because you'd need to have a concrete proposal for what else you would do that would be different actions-wise—and I don't know that that I've been compelled by many of those. I do think that there are a lot of things we don't understand right now. And one thing that you pointed to is infinite ethics. Another thing is that (I'm not sure this is moral uncertainty, this might be physical uncertainty) there are a lot of sort of chains of reasoning people will go down that are somewhat contingent on our current understanding of the universe—which might not be right. And if you look at expected-value outcomes, might not be right.Say what you will about the size of the universe and what that implies, but some of the same people make arguments based on how big the universe is and also think the simulation hypothesis has decent probability. Very few people chain through, “What would that imply?” I don't think it's clear what any of this implies. If I had to say, “How have these considerations changed my thoughts on what to do?”The honest answer is that they have changed it a little bit. And the direction that they pointed me in is things with moderately more robust impact. And what I mean by that is, I'm sure one way that you can calculate the expected value of an action is, “Here's what's going to happen. Here are the two outcomes, and here are the probabilities of them.” Another thing you can do is say - it's a little bit more hand-wavy - but, “How much better is this going to make the world? How much does it matter if the world is better in generic diffuse ways?” Typically, EA has been pretty skeptical of that second line of reasoning—and I think correctly. When you see that deployed, it's nonsense. Usually, when people are pretty hard to nail down on the specific reasoning of why they think that something might be good, it’s because they haven't thought that hard about it or don't want to think that hard about it. The much better analyzed and vetted pathways are the ones we should be paying attention to.That being said, I do think that sometimes EA gets too narrow-minded and specific about plotting out courses of impact. And this is one of the reasons why that people end up fixating on one particular understanding of the universe, of ethics, of how things are going to progress. But, all of these things have some amount of uncertainty in them. And when you jostle them, some theories of impact behave somewhat robustly and some of them completely fall apart. I’ve become a bit more sympathetic to ones that are a little robust under thoughts about what the world ends up looking like.Political givingDwarkesh Patel 9:57In the May 2022 Oregon Congressional Election, you gave 12 million dollars to Carrick Flynn, whose campaign was ultimately unsuccessful. How have you updated your beliefs about the efficacy of political giving in the aftermath?Sam Bankman-Fried 10:12It was the first time that I gave on that scale in a race. And I did it because he was, of all the candidates in the cycle, the most outspoken on the need for more pandemic preparedness and prevention. He lost—such is life. In the end, there are some updates on the efficacy of various things. But, I never thought that the odds were extremely high that he was going to win. It was always going to be an uncertain close race. There's a limit to how much you can update from a one-time occurrence. If you thought the odds were 50-50, and it turns out to be close in one direction or another, there's a maximum of a factor-of-two update that you have on that. There were a bunch of sort of micro-updates on specific factors of the race, but on a high level, it didn’t change my perspective on policy that much.Dwarkesh Patel 11:23But does it make you think there are diminishing or possibly negative marginal returns from one donor giving to a candidate? Because of the negative PR?Sam Bankman-Fried 11:30At some point, I think that's probably true.Dwarkesh Patel 11:33Continuing on the theme of politics, when is it more effective to give the marginal million dollars to a political campaign or institution to make some change at the government level (like putting in early detection)? Or when is it more effective to fund it yourself?Sam Bankman-Fried 11:47It's a good question. It's not necessarily mutually exclusive. One thing worth looking at is the scale of the things that need to happen. How much are things like international cooperation important for it? When you look at pandemic prevention, we're talking tens of billions of dollars of scale necessary to start putting this infrastructure in place. So it's a pretty big scale thing—which is hard to fund to that level individually. It’s also something where we’re going to need to have cooperation between different countries on, for example, what their surveillance for new pathogens looks like. And vaccine distribution If some countries have a great distribution of vaccines and others don't, that's not good. It's both not fair and not equitable for the countries that get hit hardest. But also, in a global pandemic, it's going to spread. You need global coverage. That's another reason that government has to be involved, at least to some extent, in the efforts.FTX Future FundDwarkesh Patel 12:55Let's talk about Future Fund. As you know, there are already many existing Effective Altruist organizations that do donations. What is the reason you thought there was more value in creating a new one? What's your edge?Sam Bankman-Fried 13:06 There's value in having multiple organizations. Every organization has its blind spots, and you can help cover those up if you have a few. If OpenPhil didn't exist, maybe we would have created an organization that looks more like OpenPhil. They are covering a lot of what we’re looking at—we're looking at overlapping, but not identical things. I think having that diversity can be valuable, but pointing to the ways in which we intentionally designed to be a little bit different from existing donors:One thing that I've been really happy about is the re-granting program. We have a number of people who are experts in various areas to who we've basically donated pots that they can re-grant. What are the reasons that we think this is valuable? One thing is giving more stakeholders a chance to voice their opinions because we can't possibly be listening to everyone in the world directly and integrating all those opinions to come up with a perfect set of answers. Distributing it and letting them act semi-autonomously can help with that. The other thing is that it helps with a large number of smaller grants. When you think about what an organization giving away $100 million in a year is thinking about, “if we divided that up into $25,000 grants, how many grants would that mean?” 4,000 grants to analyze, right? If we want to give real thought to each one of those, we can't do that.But on the flip side, sometimes the smaller grants are the most impactful per dollar and there are a lot of cases where someone really impressive has an exciting idea for a new foundation or a new organization that could do a lot of good for the world and needs $25,000 to get started. To rent out a small office, to be able to cover salaries for two employees for the first six months. Those are the kind of cases where a pretty small grant can make a huge change in the development of what might ultimately become a really impactful organization. But they're the kind of things that are really hard for our team to evaluate all of, just given the number of them—but the re-grantor program gives us a way to do that. Instead, we have 10, 50, or 100 re-grantors, who are going out and finding a lot of those opportunities close to them, they can then identify those and direct those grants—and it gives us a much wider reach. It also biases it less towards people who we happen to know, which is good.We don't want to just like overfund everyone we know and underfund everyone that we don’t. That's one initiative that I've been pretty excited about that we're going to keep doing. Another thing we've really tried to have a lot of emphasis on making the (application) process smooth and clean. There are pros and cons to this. But it drops the activation energy necessary for someone to decide to apply for a grant and fill out all of the forms. We’ve really tried to bring more people into the fold.Adverse selection in philanthropyDwarkesh Patel 16:41If you make it easy for people to fill out your application and generally fund things that other organizations wouldn't, how do you deal with the possibility of adverse selection in your philanthropic deal flow?Sam Bankman-Fried 16:52It's a really good question. It’s a worry that Bob down the street might see a great book case study that he wants and wonder if he can get funding for this bookcase as it’s going to house a lot of knowledge. Knowledge is good, right? Obviously, we would detect that pretty quickly. The basic answer is that we still vet all of these. We do have oversight of them. But, we also do a deep dive into both all of the large ones, but also into samplings of all the small ones. We do deep dives into randomly sampled subsets of them—which allows us to get a good statistical sense of whether we are facing significant adverse selection in them. So far, we haven't seen obvious signs of it, but we're going to keep doing these analyses and see if anything worrying comes out of those. But that's a way to be able to have more trusted analyses for more scaled-up numbers of grants.Correlation between different causesDwarkesh Patel 18:06A long time ago, you wrote a blog post about how EA causes are multiplicative, instead of additive. Do you still find that's the case with most of the causes you care about? Or are there cases where some of the causes you care about are negatively multiplicative? An example might be economic growth and the speed at which AI takes off.Sam Bankman-Fried 18:24Yeah, I think it’s getting more complicated. Specifically around AI, you have a lot of really complex factors that can point in the same direction or in opposite directions. Especially if what you think matters is something like the relative progress of AI safety research versus AI capabilities research, a lot of things are going to have the same impact on both of those, and thus confusing impact on safety as a whole.I do think it's more complicated now. It's not cleanly things just multiplying with each other. There are lots of cases where you see multiplicative behavior, but there are cases where you don't have that. The conclusion of this is: if you have multiplicative cases, you want to be funding each piece of it. But if you don't, then you want to be trained to identify the most impactful pieces and move those along. Our behavior should be different in those two scenarios.Dwarkesh Patel 19:23If you think of your philanthropy from a portfolio perspective, is correlation good or bad?Sam Bankman-Fried 19:29Expected value is expected value, right? Let's pretend that there is one person in Bangladesh and another one in Mexico. We have two interventions, both 50-50 on saving each of their lives. Suppose there’s some new drug that we could release to combat a neglected disease. This question is asking, “are they correlated?” “Are these two drugs correlated in their efficacy?” And my basic argument is, “it doesn't matter, right?” If you think about it from each of their perspectives, the person in Mexico isn't saying, “I only want to be saved in the cases where the person in Bangladesh is or isn't saved.” That’s not relevant. They want to live.The person in Bangladesh similarly wishes to live. You want to help both of them as much as you can. It's not super relevant whether there’s alignment or anti-alignment between the cases where you get lucky and the ones where you don't.Dwarkesh Patel 20:46What’s the most likely reason that Future Fund fails to live up to your expectations?Sam Bankman-Fried 20:51We get a little lame. We give to a lot of decent things. But all the cooler or more innovative things that we do, don't seem to work very well. We end up giving the same that everyone else is giving. We don’t turn out to be effective at starting new things, we don't turn out to be effective at thinking of new causes or executing them. Hopefully, we'll avoid that. But, it's always a risk.Dwarkesh Patel 21:21Should I think of your charitable giving, as a yearly contribution of a billion dollars? Or should I think of it as a $30 billion hedge against the possibility that there's going to be some existential risk that requires a large pool of liquid wealth?Sam Bankman-Fried 21:36It's a really good question, I'm not sure. We've given away about 100 million so far this year. We're going to start doing that because we think there are really important things to fund and to start scaling up those systems. We notice opportunities as they come and we have systems ready in place to give to them. But it's something we're really actively discussing internally—how concentrated versus diffuse we want that giving to be, and storing up for one very large opportunity versus a mixture of many.Great founders do difficult thingsDwarkesh Patel 22:15When you look at a proposal and think this project could be promising, but this is not the right person to lead it, what is the trait that's most often missing?Sam Bankman-Fried 22:22Super interesting. I am going to ignore the obvious answer which is that the guy is not very good and look at cases where it's someone pretty impressive, but not the right fit for this. There are a few things. One of them is how much are they going to want to deal with really messy s**t. This is a huge thing! When I was working at Jane Street, I had a great time there. One thing I didn’t realize was valuable until I saw the alternative—if I decided that is a good trade to buy one share of Apple stock on NASDAQ, there's a button to do that.If you as a random citizen want to buy one share of Apple stock directly on an exchange, it'll cost you tens of millions of dollars a year to get set up. You have to get a physical colo(cation) in Secaucus, New Jersey, have market data agreements with these companies, think about the sip and about the NBBO and whether you’re even allowed to list on NASDAQ, and then build the technological infrastructure to do it. But all of that comes after you get a bank account.Getting a bank account that's going to work in finance is really hard. I spent hundreds, if not thousands of hours of my life, trying to open bank accounts. One of the things at early Alameda that was really crucial to our ability to make money was having someone very senior spend hours per day in a physical bank branch, manually instructing wire transfers. If we didn't do that, we wouldn't have been able to do the trade.When you start a company, there are enormous amounts of s**t that looks like that. Things that are dumb or annoying or broken or unfair, or not how the world should work. But that’s how the world does work. The only way to be successful is to fight through that. If you're going to be like, “I'm the CEO, I don't do that stuff,” then no one's going to do that at your company. It's not going to get done. You won't have a bank account and you won't be able to operate. One of the biggest traits that are incredibly important for a founder and for an early team at a company (but not important for everything in life) is willing to do a ton of grunt work if it’s important for the company right then.Viewing it not as “low prestige” or “too easy” for you, but as, “This is the important thing. This is a valuable thing to do. So it's what I'm going to do.” That's one of the core traits. The other thing is asking if they’re excited about this idea? Will they actually put their heart and soul into it? Or are they going to be not really into it and half-ass? Those are two things that I really look for.Pitcher fatigue and the importance of focusDwarkesh Patel 25:51How have you used your insights about pitcher fatigue to allocate talent in your companies?Sam Bankman-Fried 25:58Haha. When it comes to pitchers, in baseball, there's a lot of evidence that they get worse over the course of the game. Partially, because it's hard on the arm. But, it's worth noting that the evidence seems to support the claim that it depends on the pitchers. But in general, you're better off breaking up your outings. It's not just a function of how many innings they pitch that season, but also extremely recently. If you could choose between someone throwing six innings every six days, or throwing three innings every three days, you should use the latter. That's going to get the better pitching on average, and just as many innings out of them—and baseball has since then moved very far in that direction. The average number of pitches thrown by starting pitchers has gone down a lot over the last 5-10 years.How do I use that in my company? There’s a metaphor here except this is with computer work instead of physical arm work. You don't have the same effect where your arm is getting sore, your muscles snap, and you need surgery if you pitch too hard for too long. That doesn't directly translate—but there's an equivalent of this with people getting tired and exhausted. But on the other hand, context is a huge, huge piece of being effective. Having all the context in your mind of what's going on, what you're working on, and what the company is doing makes it easier to operate effectively. For instance, if you could have either two half-time employees or one full-time employee, you're way better off with one full-time employee because they're going to have more context than either of the part-time employees would have—thus be able to work way more efficiently.In general, concentrated work is pretty valuable. If you keep breaking up your work, you're never going to do as great of work as if you truly dove into something.How SBF identifies talentDwarkesh Patel 28:30You've talked about how you weigh experience relatively little when you're deciding who to hire. But in a recent Twitter thread, you mentioned that being able to provide mentorship to all the people who you hire is one of the bottlenecks to you being able to scale. Is there a trade-off here where if you don't hire people for experience, you have to give them more mentorship and thus can't scale as fast?Sam Bankman-Fried 28:51It's a good question. To a surprising extent, we found that the experience of the people that we hire has not had much correlation with how much mentorship they need. Much more important is how they think, how good they are at understanding new and different situations, and how hard they try to integrate into their understanding of coding how FTX works. We actually have by and large found that other things are much better predictors of how much oversight and mentorship they’re going to need then.Dwarkesh Patel 29:35How do you assess that short of hiring them for a month and then seeing how they did?Sam Bankman-Fried 29:39It's tough, I don't think we're perfect at it. But things that we look at are, “Do they understand quickly what the goal of a product is? How does that inform how they build it?” When you're looking at developers, I think we want people who can understand what FTX is, how it works, and thus what the right way to architect things would be for that rather than treating it as an abstract engineering problem divorced from the ultimate product.You can ask people like, “Hey, here's a high-level customer experience or customer goal. How would you architect a system to create that?” That’s one thing that we look for. An eagerness to learn and adapt. It's not trivial to ask for that. But you can do some amount of that by giving people novel scenarios and seeing how much they break versus how much they bend. That can be super valuable. Specifically searching for developers who are willing to deal with messy scenarios rather than wanting a pristine world to work in. Our company is customer-facing and has to face some third-party tooling. All those things mean that we have to interface with things that are messy and the way the world is.Why scaling too fast kills companiesDwarkesh Patel 31:09Before you launched FTX, you gave detailed instructions to the existing exchanges about how to improve their system, how to remove clawbacks, and so on. Looking back, they left billions of dollars of value on the table. Why didn't they just fix what you told them to fix?Sam Bankman-Fried 31:22My sense is that it’s part of a larger phenomenon. One piece of this is that they didn't have a lot of market structure experts. They did not have the talent in-house to think really deeply about risk engines. Also, there are cultural barriers between myself and some of them, which meant that they were less inclined than they otherwise would have been to take it very seriously. Ignoring those factors, there's something much bigger at play there. Many of these exchanges had hired a lot of people and they got in very large. You might think they were more capable of doing things with more horsepower. But in practice, most of the time that we see a company grow really fast, really quickly, and get really big in terms of people, it becomes an absolute mess.Internally, there's huge diffusion of responsibility issues. No one's really taking charge. You can't figure out who's supposed to do what. In the end, nothing gets done. You actually start hitting the negative marginal utility of employees pretty quickly. The more people you have, the less total you get done. That happened to a number of them to the point where I sent them these proposals. Where did they go internally? Who knows. The Vice President of Exchange Risk Operations (but not the real one—the fake one operating under some department with an unclear goal and mission) had no idea what to do with it. Eventually, she passes it off to a random friend of hers that was the developer for the mobile app and was like, “You're a computer person, is this right?” They likely said, “I don’t know, I'm not a risk person,” and that's how it died. I’m not saying that’s literally what happened but sounds kinda like that’s probably happened. It's not like they had people who took responsibility and thought, “Wow, this is scary. I should make sure that the best person in the company gets this,” and pass it to the person who thinks about their risk modeling. I don't think that's what happened.The future of cryptoDwarkesh Patel 33:51There're two ways of thinking about the impact of crypto on financial innovation. One is the crypto maximalist view that crypto subsumes tradfi. The other is that you're basically stress-testing some ideas in a volatile, fairly unregulated market that you're actually going to bring to tradfi, but this is not going to lead to some sort of decentralized utopia. Which of these models is more correct? Or is there a third model that you think is the correct one?Sam Bankman-Fried 34:18Who knows exactly what's going to happen? It's going to be path-dependent. If I had to guess I would say that a lot of properties of what is happening crypto today will make their way into Trad Fi to some extent. I think blockchain settlement has a lot of value and can clean up a lot of areas of traditional market structure. Composable applications are super valuable and are going to get more important over time. In some areas of this, it's not clear what's going to happen. When you think about how decentralized ecosystems and regulation intersect, it's a little TBD exactly where that ends up.I don't want to state with extreme confidence exactly what will or won't happen. Stablecoins becoming an important settlement mechanism is pretty likely. Blockchains in general becoming a settlement mechanism, collateral clearing mechanism, and more assets getting tokenized seem likely. There being programs written on blockchains that people can add to that can compose with each other seems pretty likely to me. A lot of other areas of it could go either way.Risk, efficiency, and human discretion in derivativesDwarkesh Patel 35:46Let's talk about your proposal to the CFTC to replace Futures Commission Merchants with algorithmic real-time risk management. There's a worry that without human discretion, you have algorithms that will cause liquidation cascades when they were not necessary. Is there some role for human discretion in these kinds of situations?Sam Bankman-Fried 36:06There is! The way that traditional future market structure works is you have a clearinghouse with a decent amount of manual discretion in it connected to FCMs. Some of which use human discretion, and some of which use automated risk management algorithms with their clients. The smaller the client, the more automated it is. We are inverting that where at the center, you have an automated clearing house. Then, you connect it to FCM, which could use discretionary systems when managing their clients.The key difference here is that one way or another, the initial margin has to end up at the clearinghouse. A programmatic amount of it and the clearinghouse acts in a clear way. The goal of this is to prevent contagion between different intermediaries. Whatever credit decisions one intermediary makes, with respect to their customers, doesn't pose risk to other intermediaries. This is because someone has to post the collateral to the clearinghouse in the end—whether it's the FCM, their customer, or someone else. It gives clear rules of the road and lack of systemic risk spreading throughout the system and contains risk to the parties that choose to take that risk on - to the FCMs that choose to make credit decisions there.There is a potential role for manual judgment. Manual judgment can be valuable and add a lot of economic value. But it can also be very risky when done poorly. In the current system, each FCM is exposed to all of the manual bespoke decisions that each other FCM is making. That's a really scary place to be in, we've seen it blow up. We saw it blow up with LME nickel contracts and with a few very large traders who had positions at a number of different banks that ended up blowing out. So, this provides a level of clarity, oversight, and transparency to this system, so people know what risk they are, or are not taking on.Dwarkesh Patel 38:29Are you replacing that risk with another risk? If there's one exchange that has the most liquidity om futures and there’s one exchange where you're posting all your collateral (across all your positions), then the risk is that that single algorithm the exchange is using will determine when and if liquidation cascades happen?Sam Bankman-Fried 38:47It’s already the case that if you put all of your collateral with a prime broker, whatever that prime broker decides (whether it's an algorithm or a human or something in between) is what happens with all of your collateral. If you're not comfortable with that, you could choose to spread it out between different venues. You could choose to use one venue for some products and another venue for other products. If you don't want to cross-collateralized cross-margin your positions, you get capital efficiency for cross-margining them—for putting them in the same place. But, the downside of that is the risk of one can affect the other. There's a balance there, and I don't think it's a binary thing.Dwarkesh Patel 39:28Given the benefits of cross-margining and the fact that less capital has to be locked up as collateral, is the long-run equilibrium that the single exchange will win? And if that's the case, then, in the long run, there won't be that much competition in derivatives?Sam Bankman-Fried 39:40I don't think we're going to have a single exchange winning. Among other things, there are going to be different decisions made by different exchanges—which will be better or worse for particular situations. One thing that people have brought up is, “How about physical commodities?” Like corn or soy? What would our risk model say about that? It's not super helpful for those commodities right now because it doesn't know how to understand a warehouse. So, you might want to use a different exchange, which had a more bespoke risk model that tried to understand how the human would understand what physical positions someone had on. That would totally make sense. That can cause a split between different exchanges.In addition, we've been talking about the clearing house here, but many exchanges can connect to the same clearinghouse. We're already, as a clearing house, connected to a number of different DCMs and excited for that to grow. In general, there are going to be a lot of people who have different preferences over different details of the system and choose different products based on that. That's how it should work. People should be allowed to choose the option that makes the most sense for them.Jane Street vs FTXDwarkesh Patel 41:00What are the biggest differences in culture between Jane Street and FTX?Sam Bankman-Fried 41:05FTX has much more of a culture of like morphing and taking out a lot of random new s**t. I don’t want to say Jane Street is an ossified place or anything, it’s somewhat nimble. But it is more of a culture of, “We're going to be very good at this particular thing on a timescale of a decade.” There are some cases where that's true of FTX because some things are clearly part of our core business for a decade. But there are other things that we knew nothing about a year ago, and now have to get good at. There's been more adaptation and it's also a much more public-facing and customer-facing business than Jane Street is—which means that there are lots of things like PR that are much more central to what we're doing.Conflict of interest between broker and exchangeDwarkesh Patel 41:56Now in crypto, you're combining the exchange and the broker—they seem to have different incentives. The exchange wants to increase volume, and the broker wants to better manage risk, maybe with less leverage. Do you feel that in the long run, these two can stay in the same entity given the potential conflict of interest?Sam Bankman-Fried 42:13I think so. There's some extent to which they differ, but more that they actually want the same thing—and harmonizing them can be really valuable. One is to provide a great customer experience. When you have two different entities with two completely different businesses but have to go from one to the other, you're going to end up getting the least common denominator of the two as a customer. Everything is going to be supported as poorly as whichever of the two entities support what you're doing most poorly - and that makes it harder. Whereas synchronizing them gives us more ability to provide a great experience.Bahamas and Charter CitiesDwarkesh Patel 42:59How has living in the Bahamas impacted your opinion about the possibility of successful charter cities?Sam Bankman-Fried 43:06It's a good question. It's the first time and it’s updated positively. We've built out a lot of things here that have been impactful. It's made me feel like it is more doable than I previously would have thought. But it's a lot of work. It's a large-scale project if you want to build out a full city—and we haven’t built out a full city yet. We built out some specific pieces of infrastructure that we needed and we've gotten a ton of support from the country. They've been very welcoming, and there are a lot of great things here. This is way less of a project than taking a giant, empty plot of land, and creating a city in it. That's way harder.SBF’s RAM-skewed mindDwarkesh Patel 43:47How has having a RAM-skewed mind influence the culture of FTX and its growth?Sam Bankman-Fried 43:52On the upside, we've been pretty good at adapting and understanding what the important things are at any time. Training ourselves quickly to be good at those even if it looks very different than what we were doing. That's allowed us to focus a lot on the product, regulation, licensing, customer experience, branding, and a bunch of other things. Hopefully, it means that we're able to take whatever situations come up and provide reasonable feedback about them and reasonable thoughts on what to do rather than thinking more rigidly in terms of how previous situations were. On the flip side, I need to have a lot of people around me who will try and remember long-term important things that might get lost day-to-day. As we focus on things that pop up, it's important for me to take time periodically to step back and clear my mind and remember the big picture. What are the most important things for us to be focusing on? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.dwarkeshpatel.com
Bob Anderson, Executive Director of the Committee of Chief Risk Officers, joins us to share his perspectives on improving risk management for today's energy markets. We'll discuss what's on the CCRO's agenda: from the need for better tools and techniques to value LNG, to managing liquidity pressures from margin calls, to building stronger and more collaborative relationships with FCMs and other members of the market ecosystem.
*Udsendelsen er sponseret af Hello Fresh*Guld eller gråd på Heden?Vi kigger frem mod en helt vild kamp i det midtjyske. Hvordan har FCMs spil ændret sig i foråret? Kommer vi til at se ændringer i FCKs startformation - måske en dag en overraskelse & Hvordan vinder vi overhovedet?Som altid slutter vi med en powerranking og en ugens Delaney.Støt Kvart i Bold og bestil din måltidskasse hos https://www.hellofresh.dk.Brug koden Hellobold og 30% på dine 2 første kasser og 10% på de 2 næste.Blev medlem af Kvart i bold med et månedligt beløb her:https://kvartibold.memberful.com/joinStøt Kvart i bold ved at købe merchandise:www.kvartibold.dkDin mening betyder nogetHvad synes du om podcasten? Hvilke emner og gæster skal vi have med i fremtidige udsendelser. Vi har brug for din mening for at kunne lave en god podcast. Den kan du fortælle os i dette spørgeskema: https://surveys.hotjar.com/21e6f0aa-5719-4792-ad5b-cf4bb8234e88Det tager ikke lang tid at udfylde. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
*Udsendelsen er sponseret af Hello Fresh*Guld eller gråd på Heden?Vi kigger frem mod en helt vild kamp i det midtjyske. Hvordan har FCMs spil ændret sig i foråret? Kommer vi til at se ændringer i FCKs startformation - måske en dag en overraskelse & Hvordan vinder vi overhovedet?Som altid slutter vi med en powerranking og en ugens Delaney.Støt Kvart i Bold og bestil din måltidskasse hos https://www.hellofresh.dk.Brug koden Hellobold og 30% på dine 2 første kasser og 10% på de 2 næste.Blev medlem af Kvart i bold med et månedligt beløb her:https://kvartibold.memberful.com/joinStøt Kvart i bold ved at købe merchandise:www.kvartibold.dkDin mening betyder nogetHvad synes du om podcasten? Hvilke emner og gæster skal vi have med i fremtidige udsendelser. Vi har brug for din mening for at kunne lave en god podcast. Den kan du fortælle os i dette spørgeskema: https://surveys.hotjar.com/21e6f0aa-5719-4792-ad5b-cf4bb8234e88Det tager ikke lang tid at udfylde. Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.
** Denne podcast er sponseret af Arbejdernes Landsbank og Just Eat ** Så er der optakt til tredjesidste runde i grundspillet med et herligt kampprogram forude, der kickstartes med dobbeltopgør allerede fredag aften, når både FC København og FC Midtjylland spiller på hjemmebane. I udsendelsen kan du bla. høre UEFA Prolicens-træner Rasmus Monnerup og tidligere ex-professionel i ind- og udland Francis Dickoh tale om: * Stort fokus på FCMs startformation * Stor ros til OBs fans efter en turbulent februar måned * Hvad sker der lige for Kasper Kusk i AaB? * Preview-holdet samler ind til at købe Raul Albentosa * Ole Henriksen-derby i Søhøjlandet mellem SIF og BIF Du kan høre om de seks opgør under tidskoderne her: 00:04:41 FC Midtjylland - Viborg 00:26:25 FC København - Randers 00:39:55 Sønderjyske - OB 00:57:05 AaB - Vejle 01:14:05 Silkeborg - Brøndby 01:28:35 AGF - FC Nordsjælland
Sandro og fodboldpanelet er tilbage igen! FC Midtjylland er kommet sløjt i gang med foråret og skal til at vinde fodboldkampe, hvis Bo Henriksens tropper skal indfri målet om et endnu mesterskab til heden. I Søhøjlandet dufter der for første gang i mange år af medaljer, men Mikkel Beckmann og Morten Karlsen er ikke helt hoppet på medaljevognen endnu. Til gengæld var der engang en fysioterapeut der hoppede på Morten Karlsen til en julefrokost. Alt det og meget mere i LIGE PÅ, som er lavet i samarbejde med MobilePay og Discovery+. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af G4S Alarm og Heineken 0.0** Her får du fjerde udgave af vores nye magasin Max Mediano, der udkommer hver fredag, når de store internationale ligaer kører i sæsonen. Her analyserer vi det bedste fra Champions League, Europa League og Conference League og kigger frem mod de allerstørste kampe i Europas største ligaer. I denne uge består panelet af: - Fodboldkommentator og forfatter, Morten Glinvad - Fodboldtræner, Rasmus Monnerup - Og fodboldspiller, Jonas Hebo Rasmussen. Hør blandt andet diskussioner om: - PSG som en rigtig fodboldklub - Real Madrids fadæse mod FC Sheriff - Den flotte Randers-præstation i Rumænien - Brøndbys nederlag i Frankrig og FCMs ditto i Portugal - FCKs pligtsejr over Lincoln Red Imps - Søndagens store PL-brag, Liverpool-Manchester City - PSG som en rigtig fodboldklub - Om Atlético Madrid som storfavoritter mod Barcelona - Om Napoli kan komme i problemer i Firenze i denne weekend - Og meget mere… Der er to partnere, som sørger for, at vi kan udkomme med vores nye, stærke fredagsmagasin: *Heineken 0.0 er vores gennemgående partner på international fodbold. Det vil sige, at de er med, når vi snakker Champions League, Europa League og Conference League og selvfølgelig EM. Og så er Heineken som fodboldens øl selvfølgelig også med til at bakke op om Max Mediano. * G4S Alarm leverer tryghed til danskerne, så man kan få en alarm nu i stedet for at vente til efter, at der har været indbrud. Tjek vores samarbejde ud på G4s.dk/mediano. Her kan du også beregne pris en alarm hjemme hos dig, og det er vigtigt, at du bruger dette link, så G4S kan se, at du kommer via Mediano: https://cutt.ly/4EAAn6b
En fremragende kulisse med 34.378 tilskuere i Parken. FCK spillede 11 mod 10 i rigtigt store dele af kampen mod FCM og havde bolden 72% procent af kampen. Og alligevel tabte vi 0-1 mod FCMs betonforsvar. Vi stiller sigtekornet skarpt på analysen af kampen mod FCM. Hvad kan vi lære af den kamp?Værter: Kasper Haugaard og Kasper LarsenGæster: Pelle Peter Jenzel. DJ og Radiovært på P3, Henrik Thustrup, dataanalytiker Din mening betyder nogetHvad synes du om podcasten? Hvilke emner og gæster skal vi have med i fremtidige udsendelser. Vi har brug for din mening for at kunne lave en god podcast. Den kan du fortælle os i dette spørgeskema: https://surveys.hotjar.com/21e6f0aa-5719-4792-ad5b-cf4bb8234e88Det tager ikke lang tid at udfylde.Deltag i debattenDer er mange påstande i podcasten. Men hvad synes du? Deltag i debatten i vores facebook-gruppe, som du kan tilmelde dig her: https://www.facebook.com/groups/462533425118037Få vores nyhedsbrevOg hvis du ikke får vores fremragende nyhedsbrev, der hver uge samler det mest spændende, der er skrevet og sagt om FCK. Så kan du abonnere på det her - ganske gratis: https://www.getrevue.co/profile/kvartibold See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
En fremragende kulisse med 34.378 tilskuere i Parken. FCK spillede 11 mod 10 i rigtigt store dele af kampen mod FCM og havde bolden 72% procent af kampen. Og alligevel tabte vi 0-1 mod FCMs betonforsvar. Vi stiller sigtekornet skarpt på analysen af kampen mod FCM. Hvad kan vi lære af den kamp?Værter: Kasper Haugaard og Kasper LarsenGæster: Pelle Peter Jenzel. DJ og Radiovært på P3, Henrik Thustrup, dataanalytiker Din mening betyder nogetHvad synes du om podcasten? Hvilke emner og gæster skal vi have med i fremtidige udsendelser. Vi har brug for din mening for at kunne lave en god podcast. Den kan du fortælle os i dette spørgeskema: https://surveys.hotjar.com/21e6f0aa-5719-4792-ad5b-cf4bb8234e88Det tager ikke lang tid at udfylde.Deltag i debattenDer er mange påstande i podcasten. Men hvad synes du? Deltag i debatten i vores facebook-gruppe, som du kan tilmelde dig her: https://www.facebook.com/groups/462533425118037Få vores nyhedsbrevOg hvis du ikke får vores fremragende nyhedsbrev, der hver uge samler det mest spændende, der er skrevet og sagt om FCK. Så kan du abonnere på det her - ganske gratis: https://www.getrevue.co/profile/kvartibold Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.
**Serien Mediano Marketing er sponsoreret af Partnership - Medianos bil- og businesspartner er Audi** Her kan du komme tættere på FC Midtjyllands strategiplan, Vision 2025. Høre om, hvad de nye investeringer skal bruges til efter, at Danmarks rigeste mand, Anders Holck Povlsen, har købt sig ind i klubben. Holck købte i juni 25 procent af FC Midtjylland for 125 mio. kroner. Investeringen går ind i klubben og allokeret til at realisere en række ambitiøse planer som bl.a. at bringe FC Midtjylland i Europas Top 50 på klubsiden. I denne udsendelse møder du FCMs kommercielle direktør Jacob Jørgensen, der fortæller om målet på 100 mio. i kommerciel omsætning, om hvordan FCM passerer Brøndby og AGF på sponsoromsætning og hvordan man vil udbygge stadion med to etager, som skal bruges til skybokse og sponsorloger på et 'niveau, som man ikke har set i Danmark', som det siges. Udsendelsen er optaget onsdag d. 11. august, hvor Mediano også har interviewet administrerende direktør Claus Steinlein og marketing- og support-direktør Preben Rokkjær om andre dele af Vision 2025. De udsendelser finder du også her i kanalen. Vært på alle udsendelser: Peter Brüchmann
**Udsendelsen er sponsoret af Private Banking fra Arbejdernes Landsbank - Medianos bil- og businesspartner er Audi** Her kan du komme tættere på FC Midtjyllands strategiplan, Vision 2025. Høre om, hvad de nye investeringer skal bruges til efter, at Danmarks rigeste mand, Anders Holck Povlsen, har købt sig ind i klubben. Holck købte i juni 25 procent af FC Midtjylland for 125 mio. kroner. Investeringen går ind i klubben og er allokeret til at realisere en række ambitiøse planer som bl.a. at bringe FC Midtjylland i Europas Top 50 på klubsiden. I denne udsendelse møder du FCMs direktør Claus Steinlein, der går tæt på den europæiske tabel, som FCM måler sig med, om målet om at nå top 50 i Europa, om spillerlønninger og transfer - og om FCK, Brøndby og AGF. Udsendelsen er optaget onsdag d. 11. august, hvor Mediano også har interviewet kommerciel direktør Jacob Jørgensen og marketing- og support-direktør Preben Rokkjær om andre dele af Vision 2025. De udsendelser finder du også her i kanalen. Vært på alle udsendelser: Peter Brüchmann
House Financial Services Committee considers reform recommendations after GameStop trading event. U.S. Senate confirms Isabel Guzman as SBA Administrator. CFTC establishes climate risk unit. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce advocates for clearer guidance on digital assets and custody. SEC Acting Chair Lee recommends better disclosure on ESG in proxy voting. NFA alerts FCMs and IBs to updated FATF AML/CFT Deficiencies List. Clients & Friends Memo: UK Anti-Money Laundering Legislation in a Post-Brexit Landscape.
| Støt Monetos med ned til 1 kr. per episode: https://monetos.10er.app/ |Jakob Poulsen er ny ekspert i Superliga Zoom, og han begynder med et brag! FCM-legenden giver i programmets andet emne sin version af, hvorfor klubben er blevet så stor en succes - og han afslører flere detaljer om tiden under den interessante ejer Matthew Benham.Ellers debatterer han, medekspert Steffen Dam og vært Steen O.G. situationen om VAR – for noget, det må der gøres, og det lige nu! Hør eksperternes udlægning i programmets første emne, inden de til slut tager nørdbrillerne på og diskuterer den taktiske fleksibilitet, der er skyllet ind over Superligaen.Vært: Steen O.G. Eksperter: Jakob Poulsen og Steffen Dam.
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af Arbejdernes Landsbank** Rasmus Monnerup er taget en tur til Herning for at tale med cheftræner for FC Midtjylland, Brian Priske, som både har vundet DM og kvalificeret FCM til Champions League på under 2 år. Det kan du høre om meget mere om i denne udsendelse I august 2019 blev Brian Priske præsenteret som afløser for Kenneth Andersen, da denne valgte at træde tilbage i en rolle på akademiet. I Priskes første sæson blev det til et overbevisende mesterskab, og i denne sæson lykkedes man med det helt store mål: Kvalifikation til Champions League. Det kan du blive klogere på i denne udsendelse, lige som du blandt andet kan høre om: - Formationsskiftet fra 343 til 4231 - FCMs udvikling gennem de sidste 5 år - Baggrunden for den eksplosive udvikling i boldbesiddelse - Keeper-situationen - FCM skal spille med en stor 9’er - FCMs forskellige pres-formationer - Spillet med og mod bolden - FCM-udtrykket - Hvilken CL-modstander, der var sværest at spille imod
FCK vinder og er tættere på toppen end før i denne sæson - men bruger også læssevis af penge. Kenneth Emil Petersen tror ikke på Brøndbys førerhold. Og Olsen og Krogh bliver overraskede over, hvem KEP er søn af. FCMs spillere - ihvertfald et par stykker af dem - går til makronerne til træning. Genpres er tilbage efter vinterpausen.
Subscribe to the show FCMs and B/Ds can change/increase your margin rates without notice and without an explanation. They do this to protect the integrity of the market whether participants like it or not. This is normally done to the retail market, not the institutional market. Click here to get your free copy of The Inner Voice of Trading audiobook.
This week's episode of the Chemical Watch News Podcast sees emerging markets reporter Ginger Hervey, North America managing editor Terry Hyland and deputy editor Nick Hazlewood join global managing editor Kate Lowe to discuss three big stories from the week.
DOJ Antitrust Division AAG proposes new SRO for digital markets. SEC names Division of Enforcement Acting Director. NFA extends COVID-19-related relief to FCMs and IBs from recordkeeping requirements. NFA issues final reminder to comply with swaps proficiency requirements. SEC names acting Chief Accountant. Effective date for CFTC amendments to uncleared swap margin requirements set for February 24.
Cadwalader Clients & Friends Memo: A New Year's Booster Shot: Congress grants SEC a statutory disgorgement remedy and extended statute of limitations. CFTC staff provides no-action relief to FCMs for SOFR-linked investments. CFTC staff provides relief to DCOs from amended daily reporting requirements. NYDFS grants charter for trust company to administer stablecoins. FINRA provides guidance on e-bill final statements.
DOL adopts prohibited transaction exemption for investment advice fiduciaries. OCC proposes exemptions to suspicious activity report requirements. CFTC extends inter-affiliate trade execution relief. SEC establishes internal "joint venture" on SBS regulation and oversight. NFA reminds FCMs and RFEDs of holiday filing requirements. Effective date set for CFTC rulemaking to update the SEF regulatory framework. CFTC chief operating officer to leave agency. Supreme Court to weigh in the intersection of antitrust and “amateurism” in college sports.
AGF-tema! Genpres har besøg af fodboldkommentator Henrik Hvillum, der gør Tom Carstensen og Karsten Krogh klogere på de Hviie - en klub han har fulgt det meste af sit liv. Vi diskuterer selvfølgelig også FCKs optur og FCMs træthed i årets sidste Genpres.
| www.tipperen.dk er partner på Fidusjagten. Tilbud: Køb PRO-spil i tre måneder for 999 kroner - få 14 dage ekstra |Vi går imod en af FC Midtjyllands Champions League-modstandere i denne udgave af Fidusjagten, der som altid har fire spilforslag med til weekendens kampe.Vært: Mads Kindberg Nielsen. Eksperter: Steffen Dam og Tonni Munk Jensen.18+ | Spil med omtanke | stopspillet.dk | ROFUS.nu |
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af Heineken 0.0** FC Midtjylland sikrede sig sit første Champions League-point nogensinde, Martin Braithwaite scorede for tredje kamp i streg for FC Barcelona, Olivier Giroud scorede fire mod Sevilla og så er giganterne Real Madrid måske på vej ud af gruppespillet for første gang i 25 år. Det var en begivenhedsrig runde i Champions Leagues gruppespil, og her giver Mediano CL analyse og efterbehandling af hele runden. Panelet udgøres af anfører i HIK, Jonas Hebo Rasmussen og fodboldtræner, Rasmus Monnerup. Vært: Adam Møller Gomaa Vi taler om grupperne i følgende rækkefølge: Gruppe A (00:02:00) Gruppe B (00:07:15) Gruppe C (00:24:00) Gruppe D (00:25:00) Gruppe E (00:44:00) Gruppe F (00:51:00) Gruppe G (00:55:00) Gruppe H (01:02:30)
A discussion with Andrew Cross on the ISDA's new LIBOR fallback protocol and guidance for FCMs holding virtual currencies and single security futures.
| www.tipperen.dk er partner på Fidusjagten. Tipperen.dk laver spilforslag på skrift |Vi ser nærmere på FC Midtjyllands gruppespilsdebut i Champions League, og det er der kommet et spilforslag ud af, som begge eksperter er helt enige i. Vært: Mads Kindberg Nielsen. Eksperter: Steffen Dam og Tonni Munk Jensen.18+ | Spil med omtanke | stopspillet.dk | ROFUS.nu |
Vi har fået besøg af den danske Fabrizio Romano, der bærer det borgerlige navn Michel Wikkelsø Davidsen.Michel har sin daglige gang på B.T Sport, hvor han er fodboldredaktør og journalist. Med speciale i dansk fodbold og A-landsholdet kan vi derfor heller ikke undgå at zoome ind på Kasper Hjulmands udtagelse frem mod UEFA Nations League.Vi runder også de danske holds europæiske kampagner, hvor vi særligt dykker ned i FCMs chancer for videre avancement.
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af AL Bank, Heineken og BookBeat** Her gør vi boet op for de danske hold med ambitioner om europæiske puljespil. Det blev til især to dramatiske dage, der sendte FC Midtjylland helt ud i den sjove ende af en skala, der samtidig har F.C. København i skalaens modsatte ende. For første gang brød FC Midtjylland igennem til puljespillet i Champions League, og så skete det tilmed i en uge, hvor F.C. København for kun anden gang på 15 år skal gå igennem en sæson helt uden puljespil. FC Midtjylland besejrede Ludogorets, Young Boys og Slavia Prag - mestrene fra Bulgarien, Schweiz og Tjekkiet - på vejen mod Champions League, mens F.C. København tabte til et langt mindre og sløjere hold fra Kroatien på en maner, der i aftes nærmest gik Europa rundt som det store klovnenummer. Men hvad betyder det efter, at FC Midtjylland har vundet tre ud af de seneste seks mesterskaber: - Er et tronskifte på vej? Eller har det ligefrem fundet sted? - Er det med alle dramaer og de mange millioner in mente alligevel et udvidet øjebliksbillede? Eller hvad? - Hvor peger planerne hen for FC Midtjylland? - Og hvad med Ståle Solbakken og F.C. København ualmindelig lidt synlige ledelse? Det kigger vi på i denne analyse med fodboldtræner Rasmus Monnerup og Medianos Peter Brüchmann i studiet. Husk, at der senere fredag udkommer en udsendelse, hvor vi kigger på Champions League-puljerne og dermed også på FCMs kommende modstandere. Hør også interviewet med bestyrelsesformand i FCM, Rasmus Ankersen, optaget torsdag formiddag.
| www.tipperen.dk er partner på Fidusjagten. Tipperen.dk laver spilforslag på skrift |FCK og FCM står foran ekstremt vigtige europæiske opgaver, og det ser vi nærmere på i Fidusjagten, hvor vores to eksperter - Tonni Munk Jensen og Steffen Dam - har fundet spilforslag til begge kampe. Og det ene af spilforslagene, det vil næppe behage hardcore FCK-fans...Vært: Mads Kindberg Nielsen. Eksperter: Steffen Dam og Tonni Munk Jensen.18+ | Spil med omtanke | stopspillet.dk | ROFUS.nu |
| www.tipperen.dk er partner på Fidusjagten. Tipperen.dk laver spilforslag på skrift |Hvordan går det FC Midtjylland mod Ludogorets i Champions League-kvalifikationen? Dén kamp er på menuen i denne Fidusjagt, hvor vi kommer vidt omkring - blandt andet til Island, hvor den ene af eksperterne har udset sig et stort spil. Vært: Mads Kindberg Nielsen. Eksperter: Steffen Dam og Tonni Munk Jensen.18+ | Spil med omtanke | stopspillet.dk | ROFUS.nu |
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af Private Banking fra Arbejdernes Landsbank** Her fortæller direktør i FC Midtjylland, Claus Steinlein, midt i sin ferie på Bornholm om transfervinduet, planerne for FC Midtjyllands næste skridt og om en ny tabel, hvor FCM ligger nr. 12 ud af 12 hold. Hør også om: - Jakob Poulsens eventuelle rolle i FC Midtjylland - Danske mesterskaber vs europæisk succes - Om investeringen i FCMs akademi - Om det sportslige budget - Om betydningen af Brentfords skæbne i det engelske. - Og om strandbaren på Bornholm, hvor Steinlein måske en dag serverer kaffe for turisterne. Vært: Peter Brüchmann Udsendelsen er optaget udendørs på stranden i Sandkås, og der kan derfor være en lille smule vindstøj på optagelsen.
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af Arbejdernes Landsbank og Just-Eat - og rummer et sponsoreret element fra Colgate** Det der med drive-in-fodbold i Herning er begyndt at falde i århusianernes smag. Hver gang AGF kører i biler eller hus til MCH Arena i Herning, ender det i lidt af en fest for David Nielsens hold. Der er i denne sæson scoret 14 mål mod topholdet FC Midtjylland i Herning - de syv er lavet af AGF. Og som lidt af en modsætning har FCM en målscore på udebane på 24-4 - hvor den hedder 24-14 på hjemmebane. AGF rykkede fra forfølgerne i går og er nu storfavoritter til at vinde den første medalje i mere end 20 år. AGF er nu ni points foran Brøndby og FC Nordsjælland bag sig, mens man omvendt ‘kun’ har syv point op til F.C. København på 2. pladsen. Det blev udfaldet efter, at AGF indhentede FCMs 3-1 føring og højst overraskende vandt 4-3 i søndagens sene kamp. Det bliver et af temaerne i denne Superliga-gennemgang, hvor fodboldtrænerne Rasmus Monnerup og Kristian Mørch Rasmussen er i studiet. Begge var i øvrigt til stede på Brøndby Stadion, hvor FCK og Brøndby gav hinanden et rigtigt flot derby med Brøndby i en inspireret og dynamisk udgave, der gav masser af løfter om fremgang og fremtid. Der tales i rækkefølge om: - Runden generelt (00:01:30) - AaB-FC Nordsjælland (00:12:30) - Brøndby-F.C. København (00:44:00) - FC Midtjylland-AGF (01:14:30) - Lyngby-OB - optakt (01:32:30) - Silkeborg-SønderjyskE (01:39:00) - Randers-Horsens (01:48:00) - Esbjerg-Hobro (01:55:00) Vært: Peter Brüchmann
Denne særudgave indeholder live-optakt og -nedtakt fra drivein-arrangementet i forbindelse med kampen mod Horsens. Der sættes fokus på genstarten af FCMs guldjagt ovenpå Corona-nedlukningen, og hvad, det kommer til at betyde, at dagens kamp spilles på et tomt stadion. Sportschef Svend Graversen besøger studiet og giver status på FCM inden de sidste 12 kampe. Vært: Kent Nielsen Panel: Peter Krogh, Patrick Arff & Nicolaj Rasmussen Gæster: Svend Graversen Tidskoder 00:00:00 Genstart af FCMs guldjagt 00:10:37 Besøg af Svend Graversen 00:23:06 Optakt til Horsens-kampen 00:58:40 Nedtakt efter nederlaget til Horsens
**Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af Arbejdernes Landsbank og Oddset** Her analyserer tidligere fodboldspiller Sandro Spasojevic og sportschef i FA 2000, Steffen Dam, Superligaens udvikling med særligt fokus på 19. spillerunde. De kigger især på den imponerende udvikling i toppen, hvor FC Midtjylland og F.C. København dels trækker fra i deres helt egen liga, dels har kurs mod noget, der kan ligne en ny Superligarekord. F.C. København har den aktuelle rekord med 2,45 point i snit fra sæsonen 2010/11. Den var klubben faktisk tæt på at slå i sidste sæson, da man havde netop 82 point efter 33 spillerunder (1 point mere end i 2010/11, hvor der var 33 runder i turneringen). Men FCK tabte de tre sidste kampe i turneringen og endte med et snit på 2,28. Alt det diskuterer vi i denne udsendelse. Du kan også høre om: - Dramaet i den nederste halvdel, hvor Silkeborg fik en smule håb, mens SønderjyskE kom ud af en giftig stime. - Den moderne og lovlige pyroteknik, man så på Brøndby Stadion - Optakt til OB-AaB mandag aften - Og en masse andet. Vi taler i rækkefølge om: - Overblik inklusive FCMs pointsnit på 2,63 og kig på FCK (00:04:00) - OB-AaB (00:18:45) - Hobro-AC Horsens (00:29:10) - Silkeborg-Randers (00:43:05) - SønderjyskE-Esbjerg (00:55:15) - AGF-Lyngby (01:05:30) - FC Nordsjælland-F.C. København (01:23:00) - Brøndby-FC Midtjylland (01:40:40) Vært: Peter Brüchmann
AGF lurer på Superliga-komét, nyt fra FCMs transfer-safari, og så bringer panelet et nyt navn på banen til det ledige trænersæde i Esbjerg See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Keller and Heckman Food and Drug Partners Hazel O’Keeffe and Rachida Semail, and Scientist Tjoena Siere are hosting a complimentary webinar focusing on the EU Food-Contact Declaration of Compliance (DoC) and the Flow of Information in the Supply Chain on September 10, 2019. This is of particular relevance for any business operators who face the challenges of reviewing incoming DoCs from suppliers and assessing what approaches to take when drafting EU DoCs for both harmonized and non-harmonized food contact materials and articles (FCMs).
I denne særudgave er vi taget en tur til MCH Arena for at besøge FCMs administrerende direktør Claus Steinlein til en snak om den netop overståede sæson og se lidt fremad både på den korte og lidt længere bane. Spørgsmålene i podcasten stammer fra lytterne på Facebook, Twitter og Ulvegraven. Der bliver talt om: • Evaluering af den netop overståede sæson • Det kommende transfervindue • Den europæiske barriere • Vision 2029 • Spillestil • Klubbens åbenhed overfor fans • …. og en række andre ting. Værter: Kent Nielsen & Peter Krogh Gæst: Claus Steinlein
Cette semaine, à Ciné Brunch, on parle du Festival du Cinéma du monde de Sherbrooke. Nous critiquons pour vous une quinzaine de films qui étaient à l'affiche lors du FCMS!
Cette semaine on vous parle du Festival Cinéma du Monde de Sherbrooke et on critique les films Dumbo et Sauver ou périr.
Today's CME hot seat guest is JB Mackenzie, Managing Director, Futures & Forex at TD Ameritrade Topics this week include: Equities Crude Metals/Gold Rates Futures Options Feedback: Listeners take the reins Question from Taylor N. - Do most FCMs offer the ability to go delta neutral easily on their platform? Or do you still have to go through the hassle and risk of legging? Question from Mystrio - Are we done? Is this beginning of the end of the bull?
Today's CME hot seat guest is JB Mackenzie, Managing Director, Futures & Forex at TD Ameritrade Topics this week include: Equities Crude Metals/Gold Rates Futures Options Feedback: Listeners take the reins Question from Taylor N. - Do most FCMs offer the ability to go delta neutral easily on their platform? Or do you still have to go through the hassle and risk of legging? Question from Mystrio - Are we done? Is this beginning of the end of the bull?
This week on CFTC Talks podcast, we review the state of the futures and options industry with FIA CEO Walt Lukken. We cover the markets, fintech and the upcoming FIA Expo in Chicago. We’ll hit big themes of shrinking FCMs, lack of investment in technology and cross border trading.
Udsendelsen er sponsoreret af Sparekassen Kronjylland Hvor opstår presset i en topklub, og hvordan navigerer man i det som spiller og træner? Hvorfor har FCM haft en turbulent sæson, og hvad med det nye Herning-Ikast-projekt? Det var nogle af de ting, vi talte med cheftræner i FC Midtjylland, Kristian Kristensen, om, da han i søndags gæstede Jakob Green og Emil Halkier i studiet.
Made It In Music: Interviews With Artists, Songwriters, And Music Industry Pros
We are celebrating our 100th Episode by bringing you portions of the best podcasts selected by the FCM Team. Stacey, X, Jerricho, Logan, and Seth are all interviewed regarding their favorite FCMS episode and share why that guest was the most memorable for them. We want to thank all of our listeners for their continued support. We will return all new and all fresh on Monday, March 26th with our MADE IT IN MUSIC Podcast.————————————Episode 100Full Circle Music Show– Hi, I'm Seth Mosley from Full Circle Music, and man am I excited, this is episode 100 of our Full Circle Music Show podcast, and not only that, the day that we're making a massive announcement. And what is that announcement? It's that we are re-branding. Yes, we're changing the format, the title, everything of our podcast to make it even more packed with value, for free, for you guys. And the new title, drum roll please, is the Made It in Music Podcast, by Full Circle Music. It's resources for music makers just like you who wanna go full-time in music, and stay in. So I just wanted to do something a little special on this episode to go along with the announcement of the Made It in Music Podcast, episode 100, and what we're doing this week is we're bringing you a best of episode. We picked our very favorite moments from the Full Circle Music Show and broke down just some really key points, things that we think you would get a lot out of, things that we personally got a lot out of. I'm Seth Mosley, thank you so much for listening. Here with Stacey Willbur, VP of publishing and A&R here at Full Circle Music. Man, I loved that you picked the Ginny Owens episode, 'cause it was one of my favorite not only podcast episodes, but what a lot of people who're maybe gonna go back and listen to this clip don't realize is that it was recorded at one of our Full Circle Academy songwriter retreats. And man, if I haven't told you already, the people that you have relationships with that you've been able to bring in to pour into our students is just absolutely incredible. So Ginny was one of those, she was at our last one, and I feel like I probably got more feedback on her than a lot of speakers that come in. That's where this podcast was recorded at. So what stood out to you about that, what made you pick that as your favorite moment?– Well, it was my favorite moment because, obviously 'cause we were there, we were actually in the moment, it was an experience. It was Ginny talking about very simple things, three key elements of songwriting. But what I loved about it is that she weaved her own story into all three of those elements. I loved hearing her story wrapped up into all of that.– Yeah, she talked about it being, something that I had not heard, and I think you said the same thing, that she compares songwriting to being a journey with a friend.– A journey with a friend, that was like an a-ha moment, I think, for so many, because I don't think everybody looks at it that way. It's a job, it's this, but as a friend, and the closer you get to a friend, you get to know each other, you get to know their hearts, you get to know their stories, and the same thing with songwriting. The more you spend time… Writing every day, getting to know your craft, understanding the different elements of songwriting, the better you become and the better you know yourself as a songwriter.– Yeah, and she talks about how it is a sought after treasure, too, I thought that was such a cool way to put it. What did she mean by that?– Well, it was interesting 'cause she said it was a sought after treasure pursued by an enemy. Which, the enemy, as she describes, are distractions. The distractions in your life that keep you from doing the thing that you love doing. So what are those things and how do you keep those distractions from keeping you from doing what God's plan and purpose is for your life, which is songwriting.– Yeah, and I think, man, she just… There's podcast episodes that we've done that I feel like I just kinda wish I had like a notepad the whole time, 'cause she just kinda drops quote after quote after quote, and one thing that you shared with me, that I totally agree with is that good is the enemy of great, and perfection is the enemy of creativity. That was, I thought that was brilliant when she said that.– Yeah, and I think, especially in this industry, we hear a lot of, oh, that's a good song, that's a good song, that's a good song. And we tend to leave it there, and we don't encourage each other to strive for the great. I think striving for the great is harder. ‘Cause it takes going back and rewriting, it takes time and effort. The good is, yeah, this is good, you know. But the great, I think, is you dig it in a little deeper. And she really shares that in the podcast, she shares the struggles that she went through as an artist. And just in her life personally to get to that point.– Yeah, so good. Well I'm really glad you picked it 'cause it's one of my favorite moments too.– Awesome.– Here's a clip from Ginny Owens on the Full Circle Music Show live from the Full Circle Academy songwriter's retreat.– [Ginny] I want to offer, just based on my experience as a songwriter over the past billion years, I wanna offer three key elements of a life of endless songwriting bliss. So three key elements to maintaining a songwriting life. So the first one is, songwriting is a journey with a friend. Show up every day so that you can go a little further together. Songwriting is an art form. The more you know the rules and master the skill, the freer you will be to let your heart guide the process. And, songwriting is a sought after treasure guarded by an enemy. In order to capture it, you must fight every day of your life. Listening, like, two different types of listening that I call active and passive listening. So, I really love pop music, so active listening for me is like, when I work out in the mornings, just rolling the Apple, new Apple, like whatever, pop playlist, or what they're playing at Apple List or Spotify, you know, playlist, and learning. What are they doing in the songs that you're hearing that you like? How are they creating hooks? What do the rhythm things sound like that they're doing. Things like, Chainsmokers came along and they sort of created this chorus, where you don't have to soar up in the top, you just do this, like, ♪ Baby hold me closer in the backseat — ♪ I probably shouldn't be singing that at the Christian — But you know, it's just this tiny little space of a chorus. So there are trends that you start to see as you listen to music. If you're a songwriter-ish type person, more of a James Taylor type person, then you can listen to current people that do that, like James Bay or John Mayer. Hear what they're doing, sort of study their technique. But the other thing is passive listening. And what I guess I mean by that is falling in love with music. One of the things I've recently discovered about myself is that I'm too busy thinking about… Analyzing songs, and I actually need to go fall in love with music again, 'cause it's just too easy to be critical. And so what I've learned is, probably the easiest way to do this, which is not something that streaming really lends itself towards, but to go get people's albums. And just listen to the full album and continue to immerse myself in it, and be patient. ‘Cause I'm sure, maybe some of you guys are like this too, I'm so impatient. I'll listen to half a song and then I flip to the next song. That does not create and inspire love for music. I think those things are key for deepening our skillsets, growing our skillsets, educating ourselves. And then there's another aspect, just as we talk about kind of this skill of songwriting. It's really simple, but I think it's really important, especially for new writers, and I kind of call it the accessibility scale. So on one end you have the more cerebral, the more personal kind of songs. Those are the songs you write for your grandma, or your brother, or a wedding. And then on the other end are the more super-commercial songs. So like, Bon Iver is super cerebral. Taylor, super commercial. Andrew Peterson is pretty cerebral. Tomlin, Jordan Feliz, super commercial. And so the more cerebral a song is, the more it's kinda written to please the writer. So most of those things fall kind of more in the middle, they're not generally purely one or the other. But the more cerebral, form matters less, it's kinda in the writer's head, and obviously the more commercial a song is, the more singable it is, the more melodic, the more many people can kinda follow what you're doing. You gotta know the difference. If you wanna write commercial, study it, learn the techniques, listen to the Full Circle podcast every week, because there's an art to expressing yourself that way. But if you're gonna write about family, if you're gonna write something super personal, don't let that out for critique, 'cause you don't want to hurt yourself in that way. You know what I mean? Protect the things that are really personal to you. And the more you kind of know the skill and the art of songwriting, the more you're gonna know how to do that. Skill, taking the journey, ultimately helps with our biggest challenge as songwriters, which is fighting for your songwriting. And if you don't believe me, I bet you do. Everybody probably believes that it's a fight. Songwriting is a treasure that's guarded by an enemy. And so in order to capture it, you must fight every day of your life. Not to be all dark and wage war-ish, but, we gotta wage some war. The hardest part of songwriting is what? Songwriting. You know, you always got something else to do. Or there's always a voice in your head that says not to do it. And I promise, lest you think it only happens to new writers I have this happen every day. I've just finally learned, oh, this is part of it. This is what I'm gonna fight every day. And especially when you've been doing it a long time, you can kinda even get more in your head, 'cause you're like, what if I don't know how to do anything current? So if you give up, then the enemy will win. So what exactly is the enemy? I do like how Kevin Pressfield, who wrote the Legend of Bagger Vance, but he has a book called The War of Art which I would highly recommend you all read. There's some swearing, but read it anyway. But he calls the enemy resistance. And he says any act that entails commitment of the heart is a reason for resistance. In other words, any act that rejects immediate gratification in favor of long term growth, health, or integrity, or any act that derives from our higher nature instead of our lower, will elicit resistance. Resistance cannot be seen, touched, heard, or smelled, but it can be felt. And the more important – get this. The more important a call or action is to our soul's evolution, the more resistance we will feel toward pursuing it. Ouch. And resistance takes all different forms. Sometimes it's you, right? It's the lack of discipline. That's what it is for me, a lot. I just wanna do all the other fun things. And I wanna think about songwriting, really I do. But, maybe I'll get to it. That's why scheduling is so key. And there are voices in your head, and that's why scheduling and showing up every day is so key. It diminishes the voices, I promise you. Sometimes it's 'cause you got a eat, and so you gotta work. So that's also why finding that time every week and putting it on a calendar can be so awesome to do. Another key in fighting resistance is knowing the people who are in your space. Knowing the people who are awesome and can hold you accountable, like probably some folks you've met here, and learning the people who are not safe for you to play music for. Another way to protect what you're writing, and who the safe people are not, when you're fighting resistance. Now, for those of us who are believers, who are people of faith, we know there is a deeper resistance from an enemy that is full-on against you. And especially when it comes to pursuing a gift that God has given you to inspire others.– X O'Connor. I love it, we're here in the studio on this exciting day, episode 100.– 100.– Recapping some of our favorite moments from the Full Circle Music show, and… Tyler Bryant.– Tyler Byant, man.– Good choice.– Man, my favorite, dude, we sat down with him, I remember it was kind of last minute, I got a call early in the morning like, hey, I think we're gonna do some Tyler Byrant interview today. So I remember driving down, and I was super pumped, I'd loosely known him from being in bands around Nashville and I was like, I love this dude's music, I'm excited to talk to this guy. And to sit down with him, he's a young kid, you know, and he's just got his head on in a way that very few other artist, songwriters, any musical person does, he just realizes that hard work comes above all else, everything in life. And this guy, his band is successful, but not necessarily at radio. No real radio number ones, no nothing like that, but he plays hundred thousand seat venues. It's like, that blows my mind. And to just hear him speak about hard work. No one's gonna work harder for you than you're gonna work for yourself, so take every opportunity that you've got and just make something out of it.– Yeah, I love it, and I think he even shared in the episode something about, they do a lot in Europe.– Yeah.– And I think a fan, they were playing somewhere in Spain and a fan had like, tooken a night train like across…– Across the continent, literally.– The entire continent to get there, and they were so pumped about it. And you can just tell that when an artist is engaged, and the fans can tell that you really care, as the artist, they're gonna care.– Yeah, absolutely, and… that was something that he also spoke about a lot in this interview is relationship building. Not just with the people around you, but with the fans. The fans can feel that level of commitment that you have to them. But then on the business side, too. They've been around labels and all that stuff a lot, and I just love the mentality of, be honest with the people you're with. Even if it's a hard conversation to have with somebody, the honesty is gonna preserve that relationship in the future. I think he talked about them leaving their label to kind of go out on their own, and the conversation he had with the label after the fact, like, hey, you guys are still always on the list at a Shakedown show, come out any time, you guys worked hard for us, just, it's time for us to go do something else. And I love that mentality.– Yeah, and we went and saw them in Nashville at… Was it 12th?– 3rd and Lindsley.– 3rd and Lindsley, which is a really cool venue. And it was one of the best live shows I think I've ever seen.– Yeah, they go for it. It's so tight, but it's just raw rock and roll. It was a fun night, I hadn't been to a show like that in a while.– No click tracks.– No click, it's just guys on stage just going for it, rock and rolling. I loved it, man, it was so much fun to just sit there and just, be like, yep, these guys own it. This is great.– Inspiring.– Inspiring, for sure.– Well here's a clip from the Full Circle Music show episode with Tyler Bryant of Tyler Bryant and the Shakedown.– [Tyler] We've talked about it a little bit, but I come from a blues background, I learned to play from an old bluesman in Texas. Even as a kid, I was offered a record deal, and it was like, we're gonna set you up with other kids and we're gonna start a band, and I was like, no, man, I just wanna play the blues. I wanna make, like, I remember Lyric Street records gave me a little $10,000 check to go make some recordings. I think they were legitimately upset when I handed them back like three Freddie King covers that I had made. You know, it's like, what did you expect, man? And I still kinda have that mentality where, I don't know if you guys ever have dove into this on your show, I'm sure you have, 'cause it's something that I feel like a lot of artists struggle with. It's mixing art, something that really moves you, and commerce. Let's eat and let's survive, and so all we try to do in our band is have a little bit of both, you know?– [X] Yeah, yeah. So touring has been your bread and butter. Let's just talk about that, how do you get invited out on a AC/DC or Guns ‘n Roses Tour without radio, without big number one chart topping songs?– [Tyler] It's hard to say, honestly. I think one, you gotta believe in what you're doing, you have to be convicted every time you put on a guitar. Whether it's in a writing room, whether it's in a coffee shop. That's what, you know, I have kids ask me at our shows who have bands, like, how do you get on these tours, how do you get these shows going? And it's like, you literally play every show you get offered. Whenever I was starting out, I had a fake email account. And I was the band's manager, my name was like Sarah, or something like this, and I represented, this was before the Shakedown, I represented Tyler Bryant.– [X] What's the Spinal Tap manager?– [Tyler] Yeah, and it would, there was another time where it's like, I literally called the box office of the House of Blues. This is when I was younger, I called them every single day until they finally told one of the booking agents, this guy won't stop calling, he wants to play. And he called me and was like, dude, you can't call the box office and book a show. And I was like, but, can you book me?– [X] Yeah– [Tyler] And he's like send me some recordings. So I sent him some recordings and some videos and he put my band on for Dickie Betts. And then I called the Dallas morning news, and I was like, my band's playing, opening up for Dickie Betts of the Allman Brothers, I think you should come film it and do a story. And they did, and it's that kind of hustle that I think is, what I've learned that we have to do because it's, any time we've waited on someone else to do something for us we fall short, and so it's, I think those, it's funny because we were at CAA, the booking agency for a long time, and they did great things for us, and after about a year and a half of not touring as much as we'd like, we thought, let's make a change, let's move agencies. But we had such a good relationship with our agent that he'd become family, it's a guy named John Huie. And so we left. We were on the road supporting Billy Gibbons from ZZ Top and I get a call from Huie going, he's just like, I love you guys and I wanted to know if it would be okay if I pitched you for the AC/DC world tour. And, of course we said yes, but this is someone who's not our agent. So that's where… Maintaining relationships, and always shooting people straight, and even if it's a tough conversation going, like, I think we have to move somewhere else, because we're not getting the love here. They kill it with country acts out of Nashville, and I'm sure that the rock department does great, too. We just weren't getting the love that we needed. Because maybe what we were doing didn't move them there, but I think even when a relationship has to stop, it doesn't – professionally, it doesn't have to stop emotionally and I think that's, you know. We're all from the South and believe in Southern hospitality and shooting people straight even when it's a tough conversation, and I think that's helped benefit our band.– [X] Well I love that, because there's so many bands that we come across that are just constantly complaining about their teams. They're like, my label's not doing this, my manager's not doing this, we don't have our publisher getting songs on sync, our publicist is not scheduling – it's just excuses and complaining about people not doing stuff for them. And what I'm hearing you say is like, screw that, do it yourself.– [Tyler] Oh yeah, absolutely. We just made our own record, and I called a few of the people from Universal Republic after we got out of our deal, and it was sort of an, I think both parties were like, this isn't really working for us. We weren't giving them what they need to do what they do best, and they were like, you guys just aren't setting yourself up to win. But I talked to a few people from the label who were like, wait, you guys aren't with us anymore? It's like hey, listen, you're always on the guest list at a Shakedown show, you guys come out, thanks for putting in the work, man. Because it's hard to find people to work for you, and it's hard to find people who will work as hard as you will, so you have to do it yourself. Or at least, even like when it comes to making music videos or setting up photo shoots, or finding the direction. I feel like that has to come from the artist, because I feel like a lot of artists fall short when they're waiting on someone else to show them the direction.– Here at Full Circle Music studios with Jericho Scroggins.– Hey, hey.– Thanks for being on the show today, buddy.– Thank you for having me.– I love the clip that you picked, it was a Michael W. Smith interview, it was honestly one of my favorite ones to do. Why don't you talk just a little bit about what stood out to you from that, and why people should go back and listen to it?– Yeah. The initial part of it is how he was talking about the start of his career, and even how that's when he got married with Debbie, that was like in '81. So when the Amy Grant thing and all that kind of stuff, it was a very busy time for his career. And so they saw a bunch of marriages around that time falling apart. And so he does think it's hard for people to tour 200, 250 shows a year and keep a healthy marriage. So it was super cool to hear how he… One thing I didn't know about Michael and his career was, he was never away from his family more than two weeks. And it was just, like, mind-blowing to me thinking about that, just knowing his career and that kind of stuff. And so just how he goes through and talks about the priorities of that. You do have a career, but you also have family, and making sure they know where priorities lie and stuff like that, and his family always came above his career.– Yeah, and we get to interview a lot of super achievers on the show, so it's always cool to see that, you know what, they've not only got their stuff together on a career level, 'cause obviously Michael W. Smith's the top of the top, but he was really good about keeping accountability in place, as well.– Right. Yeah, that was definitely another part of it that I really liked, because, it's not only, like, when you go out and do your thing and that kind of stuff, still keeping a good group of, a team around you, that makes sure you're still doing what you're supposed to be doing. Whether it's heart-wise, faith-wise, even mind-wise, you know what I mean? Like making sure it's, even having them help him keep accountable to making sure he makes it home every two weeks. Or being a servant on the road, and things like that.– Yeah, and another really cool thing that I think you mentioned was this idea about talking to the younger you. What did you mean by that?– Yeah, there's this cool part where, it's the giving the advice to the younger you part. And it really stood out to me when he said, if I could tell the younger me, I would say it's not about you. And what he means by that is like, just earlier on realizing… Yeah, you're given these gifts and stuff like that, but realistically the gifts help other people, it's being a servant, making sure you're using the gifts for the right reason. Everybody wants to be successful, but it's like, how you wanna be successful dictates a different way in the way you look at it, and that kind of stuff, and that's his thing. Earlier on he looked at it a little bit differently, like, how many CDs does he sell, how good was the merch and that kind of stuff, and he realized pretty early on after that, he's like, it's not about that. It's not about you. Is he reaching the lives, is he reaching other people, and I think that goes across anything we do. The stuff we work on, even we don't go out there and tour with it, but it's still putting in the 100%, because at the end of the day, it's not about me.– That's right.– It's about that.– Yeah, that's good. Well here is a clip from our Full Circle Music Show episode with Michael W. Smith.– [Seth] Thinking back over all the years being an artist I think one of the things that I struggle with and a lot of young artists, or writers, or producers struggle with is the whole balance of being a creative versus being a good family man. How have you found balance over the years to kinda keep all of that together, what's the secret for that?– [Michael] Well, we made the rule, Deb and I, when this thing started really taking off, in the Amy thing, and then did the Friends tour, Big Picture tour, we started having children.– [Seth] So you were married early.– [Michael] I got married in '81 to Deb, so it'll be 35 years this year.– [Seth] Congratulations.– Thank you.– That's amazing.– [Michael] She's awesome. But we knew, I think we probably really knew, probably when I did the Lead Me On tour, which was… Probably the most successful, other than the Change Your World tour it was probably the most successful tour I've ever been a part of, 'cause we sold out arenas, me and Amy, all around the country, and in other countries, as well. And we just started seeing people in our genre and in other genres, when it came to being entertainers and all that sort of thing that marriages were falling apart left and right. And so we, I remember just having a talk with Deb and just going, you know… If we don't make some rules, there's probably more chances of us being a casualty than not. And we're not gonna be a casualty. And so we just made the rule, I'm not gonna ever be gone more than two weeks from my family, ever. Even if I had to cross the pond, and come back, and cross it again. And I was never gone from Deb and the kids for more than two weeks. Had a little aircraft, and I don't talk about that much, it was worth every penny, I thought, I've gotta get home to my family. And a lot of times I'd do a show and I would literally walk off stage, and got in a car, and I was on the jet and I was home at midnight and I'm driving carpool at 7:15. I did that for twelve-and-a-half years. And I think if you talked to my kids, I think, I think if you could have a private one-on-one, I think they would all say, we were more important to my dad than his career was. And now I got all these young bands, I got some of these young kids are all starting to come to me and ask me exactly what you asked me. And I think that's part of my role in the future is to sort of be a fatherly role and try to help kids. I just don't think you can do 250 shows on the road and keep a family together. And they say, well, we gotta pay the bills, we gotta make the house payment. My response is, then buy a smaller house.– [Seth] Wow. Is there anything that you would kinda say to the younger you when you were first getting into it that you're like, okay, you might wanna do that a little differently. Is there anything that kinda comes to mind like that?– [Michael] Well, I think heart-wise, I mean, obviously, we all grow up, we all make mistakes. If we really are seeking the Lord, we all get a little wiser as we get older, but I'd probably go back and tell myself at 23, 24 years old, I'd probably just say dude, it's not about you. That's probably the first thing I would say. I was so, like, how many records did we sell, and did we sell any t-shirts, and it was just so like… And it's hard, 'cause you're excited, and you wanna be successful and I think I just wish I'd have seen the bigger picture a little bit. And that's probably what I'd say to these young kids going, why are you here? Reconnect with why you're here, because you're not here to be a superstar. But there's nothing wrong with being successful, at all, but it just can't drive you, it can't just encompass everything that you do, it just can't. I always say, what's your contribution, think about… Even in the hard times, and trying to get the thing off the ground, are you making a contribution, are you changing somebody's life? So, it's that kind of stuff I'd probably say, and then, if I had to say something on the musical level, I'd say it all starts with a song.– X O'Connor sitting here with Mr. Seth Mosley, founder of Full Circle Music. Getting ready to talk a little podcast action. So, your favorite episode out of the, we're at episode 100 now.– Crazy, absolutely crazy.– Yeah.– And your favorite one was with Chris Houser under very interesting circumstances, from what I remember, kinda spontane, spontaneous.– It was very spontane, I like that slang.– You know, it's kinda like pre-Fontaine, that runner guy, but it's spontane, it kinda flows off the tongue.– This was a spontane moment, we were in the car, actually on a radio tour, and one thing that I've learned by doing a podcast is, we're really, as sort of journalists, trying to bring interesting stories to our audience about stuff that they'll actually care about, you kinda just have to be ready at all times. So I've got this little pocket recorder and a couple microphones, I stuck it in the bag 'cause I felt like we might have some interesting conversations on this Matt Hammitt radio promo tour. I went out with him at the beginning of the year to promote his first single, ‘Tears', off his record. And so I just brought it with me, and we were spending a lot of time in the car, so I was like, okay, there's gonna be something good. So it was under interesting circumstances, but I think, what I've loved about our podcast is when our guests kinda just go off the rails a little bit and just feel free to tell stories, and just crazy. And Chris is such a great story teller. So it was one of my favorite episodes. And not only because of the episode itself, but really because of my story and how I met Chris in the first place. And one thing that he did that stuck out to me that I'll never forget, we touch on that in the podcast, as well.– I love it. And he's known for hitting as many radio stations as humanly possible in a very brief time. I believe you said he has a record. Do you remember what the record is?– He does have a record, he said he hit 13 stations in three days.– Now, were you a part of that 13 stations in three days?– I think we did, maybe, we might have done eight in two days.– Eight in two, that's still rather impressive.– It was a decent few. But I love it because, so often in this business we think about the result more than the relationship. And one thing that he drove home that you'll hear in this clip is that he talks about, really what he does for a living is to get to go talk to his friends about music that he loves. He actually cares about the people. And there are very few people that I know in life, let alone in music, in anything, that have spent three decades serving one group of people. And that's just dedication.– Man, you said it right there.– Yep.– It's powerful.– I'm ready to go back and listen to the episode myself.– Me too.– So let's jump into this episode with Chris Houser.– [Seth] You talked about you started tapping into your skillset which, I don't even know if you remember this but when I first moved to Nashville, I talk a lot about this on our podcast that my first record that I got was Newsboys, Take Me to Your Leader, and my first label record I produced was this one called Newsboys Born Again which you were working on.– Yes.– [Seth] And I think I met you once, maybe at Wes' house. Then I saw you, I don't know, a month later or something and you were like, hey, Seth, it's good to see you, and the fact that you even just remembered my name —– Oh, wow.– was huge.– [Seth] To me, your competitive advantage is you actually care about people and you're great with relationships.– [Chris] Thank you, man. That means a lot, and again, it's a, this is a small industry we're in, and I'm in my 30th year of promotion, radio promotion. And I think I'm starting to get it figured out, but every once in a while something comes along and surprises me, but I've seen a lot of people come in and go out from this industry, and one of my favorite clients, Brash Music, who had Aaron Shust, and Gunger, their MO was life's too short to work with jerks. And I also believe very strongly that you reap what you sow, and whatever you sow, you reap way more, and you reap way later. It's just the way it is. You can go out to a field with a handful of seeds and throw it out into the field, you don't go out the next day and say oh my gosh, look at all the growth. It takes a long time, but all the growth that comes into a field from one handful of seeds. And so I've always tried to be about sowing good seed, doing my best to love people well, and not losing myself in the process, which at times has been a challenge for me. Yeah dude, I don't remember meeting you, and I wish I did, but it's been an amazing thing to watch your trajectory as well, and to be doing this. We're on a promo tour right now.– [Seth] Yeah, that's the fun thing right now, we're out with an artist named Matt Hammitt.– [Matt] Yeah, what's up?– [Seth] We're actually promoting his new single, Tears. So this is what you do all the time, right?– [Chris] Yes, so these radio stations, we're visiting six, seven radio stations in two days, my record is 13 stations in three days.– [Seth] Wow.– [Chris] That was up in the Midwest, that involved taking a high-speed ferry across Lake Michigan, from Muskegon, Michigan over to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, dropping off one rental car, picking up another rental car and continuing to go. But these radio stations have a hard job, they've got 50 to 75 singles getting work to them every week by 30 to 35 record promoters, both between labels and indies. And so one of the ways that we get noticed is by bringing artists directly to them. And Matt is so beloved for, you know, radio stations are gonna play Lead Me every day until Jesus comes back. It's just a matter of fact, no one's gonna get tired of Lead Me by Sanctus Real. And so I never worked a Sanctus Real record, I've watched them from afar and been so impressed with them and their ministry, and so, there are other people you could go to. But you came to me to take this record to radio, I'm very honored by it, but in addition, I'm moved by it. I have to love, this is what I tell people. I make a great living talking to my friends all day long about music I love.– [Seth] That's a pretty good job.– [Chris] So I turn down the records I don't love. I take the records that move me, and the records that I love, by artists that I respect. And, I'm calling my friends, I'm not calling adversaries, I'm not talking to people at radio that I have to buffalo, or steamroll, or belittle, or slam a phone down and swear, and call them jerks behind their backs. I love these people, these are my friends, so I get to just go bring Matt and you, Seth, to my friends for the next two days. And these are people who work hard, like me, back in the day, they do it way better than me but none of them are making major amounts of money. They're doing this for love and calling, and yet, they're the venue, they're the avenue that we will go through to get this song on the air. And it's already impacting countless, thousands of people around the country in a very, very short amount of time.– [Seth] Yeah, well even, on the Sirius Highway, or Sirius XM The Message, they debuted the lyric video, we were just looking on the way up here and it's already at 37,000 views and 893 shares, which is a pretty substantial metric for a brand new label, essentially relaunching an artist.– [Chris] Yes.– [Seth] So that's a huge thing.– [Chris] Yes.– [Seth] Are you ever surprised and shocked with like a song that you think is gonna work doesn't work, or a song that you don't think is gonna work just blows up?– [Chris] Yes. I would say, my joke on that is, through years of therapy I've been able to mellow out a little bit. But there were times 10 and 15 years ago that I was sure a song was gonna be a smash, and nobody wanted it. It's like these 115 radio PDs got together in a smoky room somewhere and all decided what they were going to tell us promoters for the next year, and then they'd all go like, break! And they'd clap hands and they'd walk out. And so when I would get this massive pushback on a song, in the early days of this kinda promotion, I would go like, I don't know what a hit is anymore, I've lost it. And then I would go to the next step, I'm like, Am I even a Christian? And then I'd go all the way to like, God, are you even there, if I can't… And so, again, years of therapy have helped mellow me out, and life experience, just to get into a better spot of going, you know what, sometimes I'm wrong, a lot of times I'm right, and sometimes it's the radio stations that will say, oh, no, that's not a hit. I try to slow the no, I try to slow them down, because it's like, if you make a pronouncement, a negative pronouncement on a song this early, it's gonna be that much harder for you to admit you're wrong eight months down the line, six months down the line, let's just calm down, you tell me no now, that's fine. I'm just gonna find 20 people that you respect and get them to play the song, and we'll come back around, we'll just keep talking about it.– [Seth] And those people they respect, is that other radio promoters?– [Chris] No, no, other radio stations.– [Seth] Radio stations.– [Chris] Other radio stations. So then they're watching around to see who else, 'cause it's all defensive posturing and maneuvering. It's all, they don't wanna add a record, a radio station will say, we'll never be hurt by a record we don't play. Do you get that?– [Seth] Wow.– [Chris] We can never be hurt by a record we don't play, meaning, we might be hurt if we go too early on a song that our listeners end up not liking. So we'd rather watch the landscape and see what people are playing out here, and it's like, okay, that's fine. There are leaders, there are followers. If you need to be a follower on this, no harm, no foul, we're just gonna keep working this.– So I'm sitting here with Logan Crockett, VP of marketing for Full Circle Music and, man, what a ride it's been, we're on episode 100 on the Full Circle Music Show and we're talking about our favorites, favorite moments, and why listeners should probably go back and listen to some. And I love that you picked the Tony Wood episode. So what stood out to you about that, and why should people go back and listen?– Yeah, for sure. So with me, my perspective on the podcast is probably a little bit different from a lot of the rest of the staff. I've been around for just over a year, now actually working for Full Circle, but initially, listening to this podcast, I was, completely from the outside looking in, I was just, kinda like a lot of the people probably listening and/or watching this, someone just trying to kind of find their lane, their path in the music industry. And this episode with Tony Wood and this clip that we're about to play just really stuck out to me as something that I've never, ever forgotten. For so long, I mean I've been pursuing the music industry for years. And it always felt like, man, if you can just get kinda that one meeting with that publisher or that record later, or whatever company, just meet that right person and get that connection. If you can just do that, that's kind of hopefully the gateway to greater things, that kind of, getting that meeting, basically. But in this clip, Tony explained that it was so much more about getting meeting number two than about getting meeting number one. Because it really does make sense, getting meeting number two means that, if you had meeting number one, they have to like you enough to invite you back. And the way that Tony explained it in this clip, it was just, it was such a massive mindset shift for me because it just, it reformed my entire strategy for what I was trying to do with the music industry. It became so much more about okay, yes, meeting one obviously has to happen, but actually that's the easy part. So my goal was how do I get meeting number two? Meeting number one kinda flew out the window, and everything became about how do I score meeting number two, no matter what relationship I'm building, no matter what opportunity I'm pursuing. The goal became meeting number two.– Yeah, and in music, it's often about finding someone who is really where you want to be. And kind of emulating them. Wasn't there something that stood out in the episode about that, in particular?– Yeah he, Tony had kinda got his start thanks to someone named Tom Long, who was kinda that first person who really believed in him and helped introduce him to other people. And that was another big mindset thing for me, too, was this idea that, there's a lot in the music industry that you can control, there's a lot of things that you can do yourself to push yourself forward, but, it's going to be really, really, really difficult to get where you ultimately want to be if you're not finding someone else who can kinda elevate you. You need to find a champion, or a guide, someone who can get you further along the steps that you need to go.– I love it, and there's also this concept of, do your homework that Tony hits on, what did you mean by that, 'cause you were saying that that stood out to you.– Yeah. So yeah, again, all this stuff is in the clip that we're about to play, but Tony, it's a very kind of quick comment that Tony mentions, but when he was first meeting these other writers around town, and other publishers, he said that he did his homework on who they were and what they were up to. So basically, that really stood out to me 'cause now working for Full Circle, we have a lot of people who come through a lot of our events and things like that, but it feels like a lot of them haven't done their homework. A lot of them don't know like even, who is Full Circle and what are the different things that we do, what songs have we been working on, things like that. Normally I'm on a lot of calls with people through our academy and things like that, normally I have to completely explain almost from ground zero, what it is that we do, who we are, things like that. Not the case for everyone, but all that to say is if you are pursuing the music industry, before, and this kinda goes back into meeting one versus meeting two but before you get meeting one, make sure you do your homework, so that way you're giving your best first impression, and you're having amazing talking points when you do finally have the opportunity to sit down and have those interactions.– That's good. One thing that I love that we get to do with the academy, with our events, with courses and all of this stuff that we're doing is that we're helping dreamers, essentially. And there's kind of this common thread that we've heard, and I think you mentioned that Tony hits on this in the podcast. But this concept of, just trying, just giving it a try.– Yeah.– And why is that important, do you think?– Towards the end of the clip that we're about to play, Tony mentioned kind of his ultimate motivation towards, the big jump to moving to Nashville and pursuing all these opportunities. And his whole thing was like, you know, there's so many great opportunities in life. You don't have to be in the music industry, not everyone is meant to be in the music industry. The music industry is very competitive, not everyone who wants to be in it is going to be in it. But Tony's whole point was, that just really resonated with me was this idea of man, like if I don't just try and kind of give it everything that I have, a no is okay. Like if I meet the right people, and if I'm perfecting my craft and it's not good enough to be where it needs to be for the industry, then at least I tried, and I can live with that. But his big thing was like, man, if I don't try and give it all that I have, I won't be able to live with that. And that just resonated so much with me at the time, 'cause again, this was like, I think early 2016. So again, at the time, my involvement in the music industry was a little limited, I'd recently gotten out of college with my music business degree. I had a really great marketing job, but I wasn't that involved in the music industry, I was like running sound with my church and some things like that. But I knew that… In my being, I'm like, the music industry is where I ultimately want to be. And I was in a place where I kinda had a good job and all that sort of thing, but it was like, man, can I live with it if I don't do all that I can to get myself down to Nashville, to pursue these opportunities. And Tony just saying that, it's like, it was like he was speaking for me in that moment. Like yes, like that is ultimately where I'm at and I decided, there is no way that I will be able to live with it if I don't try, and give it all that I have, no matter what the outcome is.– And here you are.– Indeed.– Fruit of the podcast, that's awesome. Well here is a clip from Tony Wood interview on the Full Circle Music Show.– ASCAP was real helpful to me early as a songwriter, there was a conference that they offered like about five or six Monday nights in a row in October, where they brought in writers, producers, publishers, some great instruction. Something in that that was so significant, songwriter Dwight Liles said, the hardest meeting to get in Nashville with a publisher is not the first meeting, the hardest meeting to get is the second meeting. And it just killed me in that moment, 'cause I am such an introvert. And they would use the word networking and I hate the word, 'cause networking feels like, walk across this room and introduce yourself to this stranger, and tell them why they need to get to know you. And it's like, it's against everything within me, I'd rather just take a beating than do that. And I was like oh, no, if the hardest meeting to get is the second one, I'd better be ready when I get that, when I finally get the nerve up to go introduce myself, I gotta know that I'm ready. So that sends me into a month or so of panic about what do I do, what do I do. And I came up with this idea, Tom Long was the head of membership at ASCAP at that time, and he had put the conference on. The conference had happened three or four months earlier and I'd been stewing on that. And so here was the first professional initiation for me, I picked up the phone and I called Tom. And I said Tom, in the course that you moderated, somebody said the hardest meeting to get with a publisher is not the first, the hardest is the second. I need to be ready, I need somebody to tell me if I'm ready. And here comes the ask, Tom, will you be that man for me? And Tom says well, nobody's kinda ever asked me that, but okay, I tell you what, every couple of months, give me a call, bring me some of the lyrics that you're writing, and I'll take a look at them and tell you. I can't tell my story without such gratitude to Tom, Tom Long, for that. So I take the first meeting with Tom Long, walk in, the three current pieces of paper that I've typed up, put them on his desk, sit there, quietly feeling my organs separating while he's reading them all, just the tension, just dying right there. And Tom reads three and says, I've got some people you need to meet, get in the car. Drove me around to four publishers. I had done my homework, I knew who the publishers, I knew these people, I knew who their writers were, I knew the songs that they were having success with at that point. The first three dismissed me pretty quickly and go, eh, thanks but no thanks, and the fourth one was Michael Puryear who was with a small company, Lorenz Creative Services that was going at the time. They had just signed Steven Curtis, though before his first record, that was his first home, and they had recently signed Marcus Hummon who wrote God Bless the Broken Road. So it was kind of this small little boutique thing that was going, and Michael is more of a lyric guy, and he said, oh, why don't you start hanging around here some, and let me see if I can get some of our guys to write with you. And that was… The life changing moment for me, I'm so grateful to Michael for early belief in me.– [Seth] Sure. So, backing up, 'cause just the move to Nashville is such a huge leap of faith in the moment, I don't wanna gloss over that, for you and your wife. I'm sure that was just like a monumental thing. How does somebody know when they're ready to do that.– [Tony]Nobody knows, there is no knowing, there is nobody that's gonna say the time is right. It is that line between faith and foolishness. That's so close in there, you don't know. But I remembered, there was a point when I was finishing up school and still writing frantically, accumulating lots of sheets of paper. And they were in a box kinda under a bed. Early 20s, and I remember thinking, I can't imagine hitting 50 and not knowing, and not trying. I could live if I dared to show those to somebody and they said, ah, thanks but no, there's really not a place for you. But I couldn't live with myself if I didn't at least try. I remember sometimes feeling almost claustrophobic at that thought like, if I hit 50, and I've never at least tried, I almost couldn't breathe thinking about that. So that was some of the motivation that, you know if they had said, no thanks, go away, I could've lived with that, I could've gone and gotten, I could've worked at a church and been real happy with that, knowing that I tried. But not trying just was killer.– [X] Hey everyone, this is X O'Connor and you've been listening to the Full Circle Music Show, they why of the music biz, hope everyone enjoyed our episode 100, the special episode. It's impossible to believe that it's been 100 episodes already. And again, this is our last episode for a little bit, we're gonna be coming back at you with our brand new, re-imagined, rebranded podcast, the Made It in Music podcast, it's gonna be starting Monday, March 26th. It's so exciting, we're so pumped. So again, remember, March 26th, that's a Monday, that's gonna be the official beginning of the Made It in Music podcast. And we have some huge names already lined up for this, you guys are gonna be super excited about what we've got to come. It's gonna be more great content, for free, for you. We're looking forward to seeing you Monday, March 26th.The post Episode 100: The Best of The Full Circle Music Show appeared first on Full Circle Music. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
We know “Episode 8” is a big deal for Star Wars fans this December, but for us, it means it is the end episode of our first season of the FCMS podcast! We discuss our perspectives on the December performances each of the levels put on at the Fort Collins Senior Center on December 6th. Thanks for listening!
We know “Episode 8” is a big deal for Star Wars fans this December, but for us, it means it is the end episode of our first season of the FCMS podcast! We discuss our perspectives on the December performances each of the levels put on at the Fort Collins Senior Center on December 6th. Thanks for listening!
In episode 7 of the FCMS podcast, we tell you a little about our class pets and give some more information about the chili cookoff.
In episode 7 of the FCMS podcast, we tell you a little about our class pets and give some more information about the chili cookoff.
We have a little holiday hiatus in podcast episodes with Thanksgiving coming up. But we have one more staff interview to share with you. This time, we interview Jennifer Schiller, one of the lower elementary school teachers. Along with a few more descriptions of our favorite works, we also want to tell you about some important events coming up at FCMS.
We have a little holiday hiatus in podcast episodes with Thanksgiving coming up. But we have one more staff interview to share with you. This time, we interview Jennifer Schiller, one of the lower elementary school teachers. Along with a few more descriptions of our favorite works, we also want to tell you about some important events coming up at FCMS.
Christian Wilkens er vært, og har i dag besøg af Benjamin Dane og Andreas Hintze. Gæsterne laver optakt til søndagens kamp mod Sønderjyske, og kigger på hvad der i denne har sæson har fungeret for FCK, og hvad der endnu skal blive bedre. Der bliver også set mod Herning og Randers, og kigget på FCMs form og Randers' pludselige mulighed for ny kapital.
In this DerivSource podcast we speak to Gerry Turner, executive director of Object Trading who discusses the changing FCM model, the new players and evolving OTC derivatives market. The post FCMs – How the Business Model is Changing appeared first on Derivsource.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
