Podcast appearances and mentions of Mark Cohen

As reported yesterday in an exclusive at LawSites blog, two leading international legal transformation organizations, the Digital Legal Exchange (DLEx) and the Liquid Legal Institute (LLI), have joined forces in a strategic union that brings together more than 1,500 members representing more than 140 multinational corporations, organizations, institutions and agencies across more than 20 countries.  On today's LawNext, two of the principles of that union — Mark Cohen, chairman emeritus of DLEx, and Dr. Dierk Schindler, cofounder of LLI — join host Bob Ambrogi to discuss their vision of creating the world's leading think tank for legal transformation. Among the topics they discuss:  The origins and evolution of both organizations. How their complementary approaches — LLI's grassroots community spanning all levels of organizations and DLEx's executive-level focus — will create greater impact together. What "legal transformation" means in today's rapidly evolving environment. How businesses are driving change in the legal function. The importance of mindset in transformation. Plans for future collaboration, including joint projects and events. Listen to gain unique insights into how these organizations aim to shape the future of legal through collective effort and a truly global perspective.   About the Guests Mark Cohen is the chairman emeritus of DLEx and founder of Legal Mosaic. With nearly 50 years in the legal industry, Mark has been a prosecutor, partner at a major law firm, founder of his own firm, and head of an international aviation parts business. He writes for Forbes and teaches at law and business schools around the world. Dr. Dierk Schindler is a co-founder of the Liquid Legal Institute. He holds a Ph.D. in European law and has extensive experience in private practice and in-house legal departments. Schindler has been a driving force in legal innovation and process-driven legal operations.   Related Resources Liquid Legal Institute website Digital Legal Exchange website Liquid Legal: Sustaining the Rule of Law – Artificial Intelligence, E-Justice and the Cloud (book publication) Upcoming events: Legal Tech Talk 2025 (London, June 26-27, 2025) and LLI's 2025 Summit (Düsseldorf, July 7-8, 2025)   Thank You To Our Sponsors This episode of LawNext is generously made possible by our sponsors. We appreciate their support and hope you will check them out. Paradigm, home to the practice management platforms PracticePanther, Bill4Time, MerusCase and LollyLaw; the e-payments platform Headnote; and the legal accounting software TrustBooks. LEX Reception, Never miss a call, with expert answering service for Lawyers. Briefpoint, eliminating routine discovery response and request drafting tasks so you can focus on drafting what matters (or just make it home for dinner). SpeakWrite: Save time with fast, human-powered legal transcription—so you can focus on your practice If you enjoy listening to LawNext, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts.  

We'd love to have your feedback and ideas for future episodes of Retail Unwrapped. Just text us!Guest: Mark A. Cohen Former Director of Retail Studies at the Columbia Business School, and Former CEO Sears Canada.Hudson's Bay, once Canada's proud retail institution, has descended into Chapter 11 restructuring. And the blunt truth is it's not because of recent trade tensions as the company proclaimed, but rather from years of financial neglect, unpredictable customer experiences, and questionable strategic moves. The department store's inconsistent merchandise assortments across different locations undermined The Bay's identity, leaving customers confused about what the retailer actually stood for. Join Shelley and retail veteran Mark Cohen as they discuss how CEO Richard Baker's real estate-focused leadership and lack of retail expertise have led to catastrophic outcomes, reflecting the danger of prioritizing deal-making over operational excellence. His ineptitude doesn't stop at Hudson's Bay. Saks Global is at risk of long-term survival. It's the perfect storm for Saks: The large luxe brands are not going to be bullied by Saks 90-day payment terms and Baker's financial engineering will give market share to Nordstrom and Bloomingdale's. For more strategic insights and compelling content, visit TheRobinReport.com, where you can read, watch, and listen to content from Robin Lewis and other retail industry experts, and be sure to follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

In this episode of TCNtalks, Chris Comeaux and Cordt Kassner, PhD, publisher of Hospice & Palliative Care Today and CEO and Founder of Hospice Analytics, begin a new format for the “Top News Stories of the Month.”  Cordt joins, stepping in for Mark Cohen, and brings the statistics from the daily newsletter Hospice & Palliative Care Today.Chris and Cordt explore key trends in hospice news, challenges in reimbursement, competition, workforce issues, and the impact of technology on the field.  They also touch on demographic trends, regulatory issues, and predictions for the future of hospice care.Their dialogue highlights the challenge of filtering vast information and the excellent service provided to hospice and palliative care leaders.  This podcast and Hospice & Palliative Care Today are for the leaders in the hospice and palliative care field.Join us.  This is a must-attend opportunity for Hospice and Palliative Care leaders.  It's a one-stop shop for catching up on all the essential and relevant news articles and information impacting the field today and tomorrow.Host:  Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of TCN/TCGGuest:  Cordt Kassner, PhD, Publisher of Hospice & Palliative Care Today & CEO and Founder of Hospice Analyticshttps://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/top-news-stories-of-the-month-january-2025Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Respected industry leader Mark Cohen shares how AI is helping agents do more deals with less desk time.

In this episode of TCNtalks, Chris Comeaux, Mark Cohen, and Cordt Kassner discuss the top news stories in hospice and palliative care for December 2024. This episode marks the end of Mark's two-year run of partnering with Chris to review the month's top stories, with Cordt taking on that role going forward, along with his colleague at Hospice & Palliative Care Today, Joy Berger.Mark's takes a deeper dive into three big news events in December, Cordt looks at the most-viewed articles from both December and all of 2024, and Chris, as usual, highlhights articles of particular import to hospice C-Suites. Among the biggest stories from December, they reflect on the significance of President Jimmy Carter's hospice journey and the pre-Holiday release by CMS of the 50 lowest quality hospices nationwide. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proactive communication strategies and the need for hospice organizations to be transparent and accountable. This is a do not miss opportunity for Hospice and Palliative Care leaders.Our GuestCordt Kassner, PhDPublisher of Hospice & Palliative Care TodayMark CohenStrategic Communications Consultant/Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsShow HostChris ComeauxPresident / CEOTeleios Collaborative Network / Teleios Consulting Grouphttps://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/top-news-stories-of-the-month-december-2024Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of FTX, has been at the center of a high-profile trial for his alleged role in a massive cryptocurrency fraud. The prosecution has painted a stark picture of Bankman-Fried as a mastermind of deceit, likening his actions to a "pyramid of deceit" built on lies and false promises.Prosecutor Nicolas Roos argued that Bankman-Fried used FTX customer deposits as his personal bank account, spending billions on real estate, donations, promotions, investments, and political contributions. Roos emphasized that Bankman-Fried's testimony was riddled with contradictions, as he claimed ignorance about the misuse of customer funds despite evidence from former executives and financial documents.Bankman-Fried's defense team, led by Mark Cohen, countered that the prosecution was unfairly portraying their client as a villain. Cohen argued that Bankman-Fried acted in good faith and did not intend to defraud anyone. He criticized the prosecution for displaying unflattering images of Bankman-Fried's casual appearance and lifestyle, suggesting these were irrelevant to the case.The trial has highlighted the vulnerabilities of the cryptocurrency industry and the risks associated with unregulated financial systems. Former executives of FTX, including Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, testified against Bankman-Fried, detailing how he directed them to siphon billions from customer accounts. These testimonies were crucial in building the prosecution's case against him.Bankman-Fried's arrest in December 2022 marked the beginning of a tumultuous period. Extradited from the Bahamas, he was initially released on a $250 million bond but was later jailed in August for attempting to influence trial witnesses.The jury's verdict, which found Bankman-Fried guilty of defrauding customers and investors of at least $10 billion, underscores the severity of his actions. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked ambition and the importance of robust regulation in emerging industries like cryptocurrency.As the legal proceedings conclude, the legacy of Sam Bankman-Fried remains one of deception and betrayal, leaving behind a trail of financial devastation and shattered trust.

In this episode of Daily Influence, host Gregg-Brooke Koleno sits down with Mark Cohen, Director of Sales and Chief Growth Officer at Payroll Processors, to explore how his upbringing and family values have shaped his approach to business and life. Mark shares heartwarming stories of how small acts of kindness led to significant positive impacts on others' lives, from helping a woman return to the workforce to supporting a friend in their charitable endeavors. Mark also offers valuable insights on maintaining positivity, the power of genuine connections, and the importance of putting good energy into the world. Tune in for an inspiring conversation that will leave you motivated to make a difference in your own community.mcohen@payprohcm.com I in Team Book Series: https://www.theiinteamseries.com/personal-development-books Individual Influence: Find the I in Team: https://www.amazon.com/Individual-Influence-Find-Team/dp/1641467207/ Positive Influence: Be the "I" in Team: https://www.amazon.com/Positive-Influence-Mary-Griffin/dp/1641467622 Responsible Influence: Build the "I" in Team: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1641468416

We uncover the hidden challenges and triumphs of the Hospice community in our latest episode of TCNtalks.  Join us, alongside Mark Cohen, as we discuss the impact of John Oliver's HBO episode on Hospice fraud, abuse, and neglect.  The conversation highlights the need for reputable providers from both the for-profit and nonprofit sectors to join forces to protect the integrity of Hospice Care. We also bring you the hottest topics from Hospice and Palliative Care Today, including insights on the CMS's 2025 Hospice Final Rule and alarming reports on fraudulent Hospices targeting the most vulnerable. In this podcast episode, Mark Cohen joins Chris for more for the Top News Stories of the Month of August.  This is a new format as Mark has retired from publishing the Hospice News Today as he has transitioned it to Cordt Kassner and the daily publication has been rebranded as Hospice and Palliative Care Today.  You can subscribe for free here:  www.hospicepalliativecaretoday.comWith this new format, Mark and Chris highlight the top news stories you should not have missed, each from their different perspectives.  Mark as an editor, news aggregator, and longtime marketing Executive focusing on the quantitative data provided by Cordt's team regarding the most clicked on and read stories, and Chris as a C-Suite leader of Hospice and Palliative Care.  In this conversation, Chris Comeaux and Mark Cohen discuss the impact of negative media coverage the hospice sector.  They emphasize the importance of focusing on the quality of care and sharing positive stories to counteract negative perceptions while also preparing Hospice leaders for crisis communication scenarios.  Mark provides tips for effective crisis communication, including identifying and training spokespeople, and having a professional standing by to provide assistance.  The conversation concludes with a reminder to tell the Hospice story consistently and over time to build reputational goodwill. Guest: Mark Cohen, Strategic Communications Consultant/Cohen-Fyfe Communications Host: Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of TCN / TCG  https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/top-news-stories-of-the-month-august-2024Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Comedian Mark Cohen (@mark_coco_cohen) joins Jesse, Andy and Matt to discuss the two aging bursts humans experience, restoring Tonka trucks, weaning crocodiles off of cane toads, Mark's video game creations, using slime mold to help map dark matter, and stock photo artists who play Lawn Mowing Simulator. and Mark's possible record-breaking stint at The Comedy Cellar in Las Vegas.

Join us for an enlightening exploration of the latest advancements in hospice and palliative care. Discover the heartfelt stories of D-Day veterans, the remarkable journey of a terminally ill teen who became an honorary sheriff, and the impactful efforts of U.S. Representative Elizabeth Ann Van Duyne in combating hospice fraud. We also discuss the pressing issues surrounding advanced care planning for late-stage cancer, the increasing mental distress among older adults, and a critical report on Medicare and the healthcare delivery system.Our conversation goes further into the evolving landscape of hospice care, examining the impact of Medicare Advantage plans, the growth of Silverstone Health, and significant ownership changes in California hospices. Learn about the collaborative affiliations between NOC and NHPCO, the Medisys divestiture, and the bold suggestion to abolish the 5% volunteer rule in hospices. We also highlight the importance of caring for LGBTQ+ patients and expand on Community Hospice's recent growth efforts, while considering the influence of private equity on hospice valuations.Delve into technology's transformative role in healthcare, from addressing cybersecurity vulnerabilities in rural hospitals to the ethical implications of AI in hospice care. Hear thought-provoking discussions on the mental health challenges faced by hospice staff and the rising concern of CEO burnout in the healthcare industry. Finally, find motivation to embrace life changes, with inspiring insights on the joy of vacations and the perfect timing for new beginnings. This episode is packed with valuable information and heartfelt stories that will resonate deeply with hospice and palliative care leaders and staff.The conversation concludes with another of Mark Cohen's Master Classes on marketing, communications, and public relations tips, tactics and strategies.Host: Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of TCN/TCGGuest: Mark Cohen, Strategic Communications Consultant/Cohen-Fyfe Communicationshttps://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/top-news-stories-of-the-month-june-2024Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

What if you could stay ahead of the curve in hospice care while balancing inspiration and regulatory updates?  On this special episode, guest host Mark Cohen, stepping in for Chris Comeaux, engages in a rich conversation with Cordt Kassner and Joy Berger from Hospice and Palliative Care Today.  We dive into their meticulous process for curating news, offering insights into how they select articles that resonate with a diverse audience, ranging from C-suite executives to frontline clinicians.  Joy Berger highlights their interdisciplinary approach and the importance of balanced content to keep hospice professionals well-informed about the latest industry trends.Discover the top healthcare trends from our May podcast as we cover everything from regulatory updates and mission moments to reimbursement challenges and workforce issues. Learn about the latest developments from CMS and HHS, and be inspired by stories like a 98-year-old Marine veteran earning his high school diploma.  We also address the pressing challenges of nursing shortages and the impact of unions, while examining how big companies are entering the healthcare space and the demographic shifts influencing the care of an aging population.In another compelling segment, we explore the broader implications of years-long stories like the rise and fall of stories VBID and retail health clinics and whether the media covered these well.  Understand the effects on local healthcare ecosystems and the emergence of pharmacy and hospice deserts.  This episode underscores the necessity of proactive issues management in healthcare to stay ahead of sociopolitical trends and stakeholder expectations.  Join us for an insightful and heartwarming discussion that sheds light on the critical issues shaping the hospice and palliative care landscape.TakeawaysIssues management is crucial for healthcare organizations to anticipate and respond to emerging trends and changes in the sociopolitical environment.Staying informed about competition, workforce challenges, patient demographics, regulatory issues, technology and innovations, and more is essential for Hospice decision makers.Understanding different perspectives and engaging in interdisciplinary collaboration is key to effective issues management.Subscribing to Hospice newsletters and and listening to podcasts like this are the foundation of a solid issue management program.Guest:Joy Berger, Editor in Chief, Hospice & Palliative Care TodayCordt Kassner, Owner / Publisher of Hospice and Palliative Care TodayGuest Host:Mark Cohen, Strategic Communications Consultant/Cohen-Fyfe Communications BiographyBlog page: https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/top-news-stories-of-the-month-may-2024Chapter Markers0:01      Brevity in Hospice News Publishing17:02   Top Trends in Healthcare Articles32:49   Fluctuating Trends in Healthcare Environment49:40   DeltaCareRx Sponsorship and ServicesTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Ron and Dave talk with Mark Cohen about his latest version of Digital Diamond, version 12.

Discover the pulse of hospice and palliative care as I, alongside Mark Cohen, unravel the complexities and triumphs of the industry's latest happenings.  We've curated a compelling lineup of topics that promise to enrich your understanding of the field, from the stark disparities in cancer rates within the LGBTQ+ community to the ongoing struggles Black Americans face in serious illness care. As local newsrooms face cutbacks, we shed light on alternative ways hospice providers can remain influential in their communities, and we don't shy away from the gritty reality of legislative changes impacting hospice care.Navigating the turbulent waters of healthcare, we dissect the seismic shifts from nonprofit hospitals to concierge care and the potential upheavals of Cigna's and Humana's corporate dance.  The conversation takes a deep dive into the workforce crisis plaguing nursing, revealing the burnout, financial strains, and the surge in unionization that are reshaping the landscape. Mark Cohen's insights illuminate the monumental wage suit victory for Providence employees, and the implications these tides of change could have on early-career doctors and the patients they serve.In our final chapter, we explore the avant-garde of healthcare regulations and innovation, analyzing the Labor Department's new overtime rule, Medicare and Medicaid missteps, and the proposed 2025 hospice rule changes.  We venture into the realm of technological advancements, discussing cutting-edge tools enhancing senior care and the pivotal role of telehealth in rural caregiving. As we close, remember: Effective media relations are vital for hospices, and I offer pearls of wisdom on staying visible in the media fray, inspired by George Eliot's belief in the power of small, consistent efforts.Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

RDJ and Mark CohenRobert Downey Jr. (Jeff Richards) and Mark Cohen (Make Me Laugh) chat candidly about egg sandwiches, the fun kind of mushrooms, comedy, and movies in this hilarious intersection of life, liberty and the pursuit of individual freedom.

In this week's podcast Mark Cohen joins me once more for the Top News Stories for the prior month.  This is a new format as Mark has retired from publishing the Hospice News Today as he has transitioned it to Cordt Kassner and the daily publication has been rebranded as Hospice and Palliative Care Today.  You can subscribe for free here:  https://www.hospicepalliativecaretoday.com/With this new format Mark and Chris highlight the top news stories you should not have missed each from their different perspectives Mark as an editor, news aggregator, and longtime marketing Executive focusing on the quantitative data provided by Cordt's team regarding the most clicked on and read stories, and Chris as a C-Suite leader of Hospice and palliative care.Join us as we explore in this episode topics such as rising suicide risk among seniors, HHS Secretary Becerra's testimony, MedPAC's payment policy report, and technical corrections to the CAHPS Hospice Survey.  They also categorize the articles into themes such as mission moments, reimbursement challenges, competition, workforce challenges, patient and family demographics, regulatory and political issues, technology and innovations, and more. Mark also provides a master class on the use of stock photography in hospice marketing. Tune in for a comprehensive analysis that intertwines personal experiences, industry insights, and forward-looking predictions, all contributing to a must-listen episode for healthcare professionals and enthusiasts alike.  You won't want to miss this.  Guest: Mark Cohen, Strategic Communications Consultant/Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsHost: Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of TCN / TCGwww.teleioscn.orgTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Book Vs. Movie: RentThe 1896 Opera Vs. the 2005 Movie (Based on the 1996 Play)"Rent" is a modern adaptation of Giacomo Puccini's opera "La Bohème." It tells the story of a group of struggling artists living in New York City's East Village during the late 1980s and early 1990s, dealing with poverty, love, and the AIDS epidemic. The late Jonathan Larson wrote the book, music & lyrics for the show and tragically died a few months before its Broadway debut on January 26, 1996. The plot revolves around a diverse group of characters:Mark Cohen is an aspiring filmmaker and the narrator of the story. He is grappling with his identity and relationship with his ex-girlfriend, Maureen.Roger Davis: A former rock musician who is HIV positive. He is struggling to come to terms with his diagnosis and find inspiration for his music.Mimi Marquez: An exotic dancer who is also HIV positive. She falls in love with Roger, but their shared illness complicates their relationship.Tom Collins: A philosophy professor who is also HIV positive. He falls in love with Angel.Angel Dumott Schunard: A drag queen and street percussionist who becomes Tom's love interest.Maureen Johnson: A performance artist and Mark's ex-girlfriend. She is involved with Joanne.Joanne Jefferson: A lawyer and Maureen's current girlfriend.The story explores their relationships, struggles with poverty, creative pursuits, and the impact of HIV/AIDS on their lives and the broader community. Themes of friendship, love, loss, and the pursuit of artistic expression are central to the narrative. As in "La Bohème," the characters face challenges related to their financial circumstances, illness, and the complexities of love and friendship. The story ultimately celebrates their resilience, creativity, and the power of human connection in the face of adversity. Which did we (the Margos) prefer of all of the adaptations?In this ep, the Margos discuss:The original novel, the Pucini opera, and the 1996 musical The life of Jonathan Larson and the sheer magnitude of the show's influence on pop culture. The cast of the 2022 film includes Taye Diggs (Benjamin Coffin,) Wilson Jermaine Heredia (Angel,) Rosario Dawson (Mimi,) Anthony Rapp (Mark Cohen,) Adam Pascal (Roger Davis,) Jesse L. Martin (Tom Collins,) Idina Menzel (Maureen Johnson,) Tracie Thoms (Joanne,) and Julia Roth as a rent tenant. Clips used:“La Vie Boheme”Rent (2005 trailer) “Seasons of Love”“Another Day”“Rent Tango”“Take Me or Leave Me”Music and Lyrics by Jonathan LarsonBook Vs. Movie is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find more podcasts you will love Frolic.Media/podcasts. Join our Patreon page “Book Vs. Movie podcast”You can find us on Facebook at Book Vs. Movie Podcast GroupFollow us on Twitter @bookversusmovieInstagram: Book Versus Movie https://www.instagram.com/bookversusmovie/Email us at bookversusmoviepodcast@gmail.com Margo D. Twitter @BrooklynMargo Margo D's Blog www.brooklynfitchick.com Margo D's Instagram “Brooklyn Fit Chick”Margo D's TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@margodonohuebrooklynfitchick@gmail.comYou can buy your copy of Filmed in Brooklyn here! Margo P. Twitter @ShesNachoMamaMargo P's Instagram https://www.instagram.com/shesnachomama/Margo P's Blog  https://coloniabook.weebly.com/ Our logo was designed by Madeleine Gainey/Studio 39 Marketing Follow on Instagram @Studio39Marketing & @musicalmadeleine 

Book Vs. Movie: RentThe 1896 Opera Vs. the 2005 Movie (Based on the 1996 Play)"Rent" is a modern adaptation of Giacomo Puccini's opera "La Bohème." It tells the story of a group of struggling artists living in New York City's East Village during the late 1980s and early 1990s, dealing with poverty, love, and the AIDS epidemic. The late Jonathan Larson wrote the book, music & lyrics for the show and tragically died a few months before its Broadway debut on January 26, 1996. The plot revolves around a diverse group of characters:Mark Cohen is an aspiring filmmaker and the narrator of the story. He is grappling with his identity and relationship with his ex-girlfriend, Maureen.Roger Davis: A former rock musician who is HIV positive. He is struggling to come to terms with his diagnosis and find inspiration for his music.Mimi Marquez: An exotic dancer who is also HIV positive. She falls in love with Roger, but their shared illness complicates their relationship.Tom Collins: A philosophy professor who is also HIV positive. He falls in love with Angel.Angel Dumott Schunard: A drag queen and street percussionist who becomes Tom's love interest.Maureen Johnson: A performance artist and Mark's ex-girlfriend. She is involved with Joanne.Joanne Jefferson: A lawyer and Maureen's current girlfriend.The story explores their relationships, struggles with poverty, creative pursuits, and the impact of HIV/AIDS on their lives and the broader community. Themes of friendship, love, loss, and the pursuit of artistic expression are central to the narrative. As in "La Bohème," the characters face challenges related to their financial circumstances, illness, and the complexities of love and friendship. The story ultimately celebrates their resilience, creativity, and the power of human connection in the face of adversity. Which did we (the Margos) prefer of all of the adaptations?In this ep, the Margos discuss:The original novel, the Pucini opera, and the 1996 musical The life of Jonathan Larson and the sheer magnitude of the show's influence on pop culture. The cast of the 2022 film includes Taye Diggs (Benjamin Coffin,) Wilson Jermaine Heredia (Angel,) Rosario Dawson (Mimi,) Anthony Rapp (Mark Cohen,) Adam Pascal (Roger Davis,) Jesse L. Martin (Tom Collins,) Idina Menzel (Maureen Johnson,) Tracie Thoms (Joanne,) and Julia Roth as a rent tenant. Clips used:“La Vie Boheme”Rent (2005 trailer) “Seasons of Love”“Another Day”“Rent Tango”“Take Me or Leave Me”Music and Lyrics by Jonathan LarsonBook Vs. Movie is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find more podcasts you will love Frolic.Media/podcasts. Join our Patreon page “Book Vs. Movie podcast”You can find us on Facebook at Book Vs. Movie Podcast GroupFollow us on Twitter @bookversusmovieInstagram: Book Versus Movie https://www.instagram.com/bookversusmovie/Email us at bookversusmoviepodcast@gmail.com Margo D. Twitter @BrooklynMargo Margo D's Blog www.brooklynfitchick.com Margo D's Instagram “Brooklyn Fit Chick”Margo D's TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@margodonohuebrooklynfitchick@gmail.comYou can buy your copy of Filmed in Brooklyn here! Margo P. Twitter @ShesNachoMamaMargo P's Instagram https://www.instagram.com/shesnachomama/Margo P's Blog  https://coloniabook.weebly.com/ Our logo was designed by Madeleine Gainey/Studio 39 Marketing Follow on Instagram @Studio39Marketing & @musicalmadeleine 

#smarternotharder #marccohen #hydrotherapy #ancientfuturemedicine n this episode of the Smarter Not Harder Podcast,  we sit down with Dr. Marc Cohen to explore the fascinating world of ancient future medicine – simple, accessible, and often forgotten practices for vibrant health and wellness. *Join us as we delve into:* + The revitalizing power of hot springs: Exploring how hot springs and hydrotherapy can offer a myriad of potential health benefits. + Water, water everywhere, but is it safe to drink? Examining water quality, filtration, and the hidden downsides of chlorination on our bodies. + Feeding your gut for optimal health: How fermentation and the gut microbiome play key roles in your overall health and wellbeing. + Balancing blood sugar with a touch of bitterness: Herbal medicine for blood sugar regulation and controlling those pesky sweet cravings. *This episode is for you if:* - You're seeking natural ways to improve your health and wellness. - You're curious about practices used throughout history and backed by modern science. - You want tools to manage stress and cultivate greater ease and stillness. - You're searching for answers about water quality, optimal hydration, and gut health.

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has decided to move forward with Marc Mukasey as his defense counsel in his criminal case related to the collapse of his crypto exchange FTX. This is despite prosecutors raising concerns about a potential conflict of interest given Mukasey's previous representation of Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky.Mukasey, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan, is currently representing Mashinsky on charges that he allegedly inflated the price of Celsius' crypto token and earned $42 million selling his personal tokens. Given that SBF's trading firm Alameda Research has past dealings with Celsius, prosecutors questioned whether Mukasey could fairly represent both men.However, when appearing in court on Wednesday for the first time since being indicted, SBF told Judge Lewis Kaplan he was comfortable retaining Mukasey and his associate Torrey Young for his defense team. SBF stated he had consulted with his previous lawyers, Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell, about the possible conflict. Cohen and Everdell will now seek to withdraw from SBF's case, clearing the way for Mukasey and Young to take over.For his part, Mukasey argued to the court on Tuesday that his firm believes they can "fairly represent" both Bankman-Fried and Mashinsky in their respective cases. SBF remains detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center since his arrest in December 2022.The high-profile case against SBF continues to develop. The 30-year old founder of the now-bankrupt FTX faces charges of fraud and money laundering that could see him imprisoned for the rest of his life. His willingness to overlook Mukasey's potential conflict of interest signals SBF's desperation to begin crafting a defense strategy alongside the experienced trial lawyer.

SBF Sticks With Mashinsky's Lawyer Despite Possible ConflictSam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has decided to move forward with Marc Mukasey as his defense counsel in his criminal case related to the collapse of his crypto exchange FTX. This is despite prosecutors raising concerns about a potential conflict of interest given Mukasey's previous representation of Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky.Mukasey, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan, is currently representing Mashinsky on charges that he allegedly inflated the price of Celsius' crypto token and earned $42 million selling his personal tokens. Given that SBF's trading firm Alameda Research has past dealings with Celsius, prosecutors questioned whether Mukasey could fairly represent both men.However, when appearing in court on Wednesday for the first time since being indicted, SBF told Judge Lewis Kaplan he was comfortable retaining Mukasey and his associate Torrey Young for his defense team. SBF stated he had consulted with his previous lawyers, Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell, about the possible conflict. Cohen and Everdell will now seek to withdraw from SBF's case, clearing the way for Mukasey and Young to take over.For his part, Mukasey argued to the court on Tuesday that his firm believes they can "fairly represent" both Bankman-Fried and Mashinsky in their respective cases. SBF remains detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center since his arrest in December 2022.The high-profile case against SBF continues to develop. The 30-year old founder of the now-bankrupt FTX faces charges of fraud and money laundering that could see him imprisoned for the rest of his life. His willingness to overlook Mukasey's potential conflict of interest signals SBF's desperation to begin crafting a defense strategy alongside the experienced trial lawyer.

In this week's podcast, Mark Cohen joins Chris Comeaux again for the Top News Stories of the prior month.  This is a new format as Mark has retired from publishing the Hospice News Today as he has transitioned it to Cordt Kassner and the daily publication has been rebranded as Hospice and Palliative Care Today.  You can subscribe for free here:  www.hospicepalliativecaretoday.comWith this new format, Mark and Chris highlight the top news stories you don't want to miss, each from their different perspectives.  Mark is an editor, news aggregator, and longtime marketing Executive, and Chris is a C-Suite leader of hospice and palliative care.Join us as they explore the dynamic shifts within the hospice industry.  Their conversation celebrates impactful 'mission moments' within hospice care, sharing heartfelt stories that exemplify the profound connection between caregivers and patients and address the financial and operational challenges hospices face today.  Listen in as they tackle the critical issues in healthcare, from the effects of Medicare Advantage on hospice reimbursement to the concerns of data breaches and AI evolutions.  They engage with the complexities of an industry under the microscope of private equity and regulatory scrutiny and highlight the inspiring ways technology is reshaping care delivery.  The discussion with Mark extends to the closure of rural hospitals.Also, for a fun twist this month, Mark and Chris highlight their predictions and trends we will see over 2024.  As we gaze into the future, they share predictions for the healthcare trends of 2024, anticipating collaborative networks, the consequences of pharmacy deserts, and the enduring struggles of the healthcare workforce.Tune in for a comprehensive analysis that intertwines personal experiences, industry insights, and forward-looking predictions, all contributing to a must-listen episode for healthcare professionals and enthusiasts alike.  You won't want to miss this. Guest: Mark CohenPrincipal, Cohen-Fyfe Communications LLCBiographyHost:  Chris ComeauxPresident & CEOTeleios Collaborative NetworkTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

As the year winds down, Mark Cohen joins me once more, bringing the warmth of the holidays to our discussion before we peer into the shifting tides of hospice and palliative care. Our conversation begins with the merriment of jazz in Montreal and quickly pivots to the sobering realities of the healthcare sector. From the scrutiny of nursing homes to the reshaping forces of industry mergers, we unpack the transformative events that are molding the future of end-of-life care.Mark and I then cast a light on the healthcare headlines that have captivated our attention. We tackle the severe nursing shortage, navigate the complexities of medical marijuana policies, and honor the unsung heroes of healthcare—volunteers. As we pay homage to the lifelong dedication of Rosalynn Carter to caregivers, we also scrutinize the rising influence of for-profit providers in a field traditionally driven by a mission to serve.The final moments of our masterclass with Mark are spent reflecting on the essence of what we do. We consider the weight of words in the hospice community, challenging the term "industry" for its inability to capture the movement's roots and its mission-focused spirit. We wrap up with an honest look at the financial sustainability of non-profit healthcare, invoking Sister Irene Krause's wisdom: "No margin, no mission." It's a poignant reminder that to care for others, we must ensure the stability of those who serve. Join us for an episode that celebrates the holiday spirit, confronts the challenges of healthcare, and honors the individuals dedicated to making a difference.Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Just in time for the holiday season, Dan Spiegel, Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Coldwell Banker Commercial, will explore the future of the mall landscape and dive deeper into CBC's Trend Report with retail experts Mark Cohen, Director of Retail Studies at Columbia Business School and Al Urbanski, Real Estate Editor at Chain Store Age. From past to present, this episode breaks down the history of malls and the evolution of the retail environment to decipher how property owners can generate mall traffic in the modern age. Host: Dan Spiegel, SVP & Managing Director of Coldwell Banker Commercial Guest: Mark Cohen, Director of Retail Studies at Columbia Business School Guest: Al Urbanski, Real Estate Editor at Chain Store Age

Crypto CubedIt's enigmatic and potential problematic. Lisa Forte, Partner at Red Goat Security , Phil Ingram MBE of Greyhare Media and Ian Thornton-Trump CD, CISO for Cyjax go around the table on Cryptocurrencies and the wide-ranging impact they are having on geopolitical conflict and economic conflict. The panel covers a lot of ground. The sensational trial of Sam Bankman-Fried who was found guilty on all seven counts related to the collapse of FTX could land him 115 years in jail depending on how much momentum there is for an appeal – his attorney Mark Cohen said Bankman-Fried respects the jury's decision but maintains his innocence and will continue to "vigorously fight the charges." So, yet another chapter in the saga may yet unfold.The background to the trial was straight forward. The FTX exchange fell into bankruptcy after users found they could no longer withdraw their funds, worth billions of dollars in aggregate. The money was funnelled it into a sibling company, called Alameda Research, and used it for risky stock trades, political donations, and funding his extravagant lifestyle. He also flamboyantly ignored his lawyer's advice and prior to the trial he conducted many media interviews as well as written testimony to Congress and then as part of the final trial preceding's appeared on the witness stand to defend himself. It's safe to say the jury was unimpressed as he crumbled against all the evidence, he himself had provided to government prosecutors due to his public statements.The fundraising efforts and overt Iranian funding of the Hamas terrorist organization came under discussion.  Eleven days after the Terrorist attack in Israel the "U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed sanctions on ten key Hamas terrorist group members, operatives, and financial facilitators in Gaza and elsewhere including Sudan, Türkiye, Algeria, and Qatar. This action targets members managing assets in a secret Hamas investment portfolio, a Qatar-based financial facilitator with close ties to the Iranian regime, a key Hamas commander, and a Gaza-based virtual currency exchange and its operator." Digging deeper into this it was soon realised crypto currency and exchanges had played a massive part in providing the funds to conduct the sinister attack into southern Israel.  It appears financial sanctions against terrorist organizations were easily bypassed by cryptocurrencies exchanges despite intelligence of digital-currency wallets connected to Hamas receiving about $41 million over the past two years according to Tel Aviv-based crypto analytics and software firm BitOK and information on Palestinian Islamic Jihad receiving $93 million in crypto during the same period, based on crypto researcher Elliptic's data.Zooming out of these specific revelations the panel examined the wider implications of both nation state sanction avoidance, the ability to effectively bypass the American financial system and the role of crypto currencies in funding global political movements - somewhat anonymously. There are rather chilling revelations as cryptocurrencies are found at the very centre of political agendas, disinformation campaigns and financial transactions between countries subject to economic sanctions by both US and EU/UK governments. Despite analysis proclaiming that far more legitimate and legal transactions are occurring on crypto currency blockchains than illegitimate and illegal transactions the simple conclusion is we don't know how bad the problem is until the damage has already been done.

Do you ever sense déjà vu when reading hospice news? Is the content so monotonous that it feels like you are on a never-ending treadmill? That's what Mark Cohen and I, Chris Comeaux, explore this month on TCNtalks, specifically focusing on Hospice Month and the need to transform dull writing into impactful narratives. We delve into the importance of seasoned writers and the power of mentorship in creating engaging articles. As the conversation unfolds, we focus on the significant healthcare stories that made headlines - everything from long-term care to labor and employment. We offer our in-depth analysis on hot topics like mandatory staffing in nursing homes, recent mergers, and the rise of death doulas. But that's not all; we also touch upon the less-than-favorable publicity hospitals are receiving and shed light on labor and employment news. Before we sign off, we take a moment to reflect on our journey, expressing gratitude for this platform that allows us to shed light on crucial matters. I want to thank Mark for his invaluable insights that enrich our discussions. This episode is a goldmine of insights for leaders or staff in the hospice and palliative care field, or anyone interested in the healthcare landscape. We hope to spark thoughts, ignite conversations, and inspire you with our dialogues. As John Maxwell said, "Leadership is not about titles, positions or flowcharts. It's about one life influencing another," and we strive to do just that.Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

In this podcast, Chris continues the monthly program that will be airing throughout 2023.  Mark Cohen is the Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, an essential news and issues management briefing published 365 days a year for hospice leaders. Cohen is also the Principal of his strategic communications firm, Cohen-Fyfe Communications.  Mark spends hours each day reviewing and abstracting articles that make up his daily news brief, Hospice News Today.  In this monthly podcast, Chris and Mark highlight the top 10 news stories of the prior month.  This monthly episode is an excellent resource for busy hospice and palliative care leaders, staff, and the Board.  Mark's perspective is unique, given his purview of the volume of articles as he scours 100's of news sources to produce Hospice News Today.  Chris's perspective is what hospice and palliative care leaders need to know to help lead their organizations and teams today, but also what they need to know in order to prepare for tomorrow as well.  Both perspectives make for an enlightening show, so enjoy this podcast as Mark and Chris highlight their picks for the top 10-ish news articles for the past month (along with their honorable mentions that didn't quite make the cut).  This is a great listen.  Join us; this is timely, relevant, and packed with need-to-know information.   Host:  Chris Comeaux, President & CEO of TCNGuest:  Mark Cohen, Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, and Principal, Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

The downfall of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried from king of the crypto world to crypto scammer is complete. A Manhattan jury of nine women and three men took less than five hours Thursday afternoon, day 18 of the high-profile trial, to convict Bankman-Fried on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy for stealing billions of dollars of his customers' assets.  “Sam Bankman-Fried perpetrated one of the biggest financial frauds in American history, a multi-million scheme designed to make him the king of crypto,” said Damian Williams, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York in remarks following the verdict. The guilty verdict came a year to the day after crypto publication CoinDesk published a story showing balance sheet irregularities at Bankman-Fried's investment company, Alameda Research, that suggested the ties between Alameda and FTX were unusually close. Bankman-Fried now faces potentially decades in prison. Sentencing is scheduled for March 28. After listening to Judge Lewis Kaplan read through 60 pages of instructions, jurors quickly concluded that Bankman-Fried was responsible for decisions that led to an $8 billion hole in its balance sheet, including the use of customer assets for political donations, investments and his own personal use. Prosecutors had reiterated this theme in a stinging, Thursday morning rebuttal.  And jurors rejected whole-hog Bankman-Fried's defense team's narrative that Bankman-Fried was being villainized for being a poor manager who didn't create sufficient risk management systems. They also did not buy into Bankman-Fried's claim that he was unaware of the severity of his company's financial problems and that his inner circle, three of whom testified earlier in the trial as part of plea agreements, were to blame.  “We respect the jury's decision,” said Bankman-Fried's lead attorney, Mark Cohen. But we are very disappointed with the result. Mr. Bankman-Fried maintains his innocence and will continue to fight the charges against him.” U.S. attorney Wiliams called Bankman-Fried's crimes “ fraud” as “old as time,” and said his office had “no patience for it.”  He added: “This case moved at lightning speed, that was a choice, not a coincidence.” Catch up on Unchained's previous coverage:  SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF's Family SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied' While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable' SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF's Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda's Special Privileges SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison? SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life' SBF Trial, Day 7: In SBF Trial, Did the Defense Lose Its Opportunity With the Star Witness? SBF Trial, Day 8: Former BlockFi CEO Adds Credibility to Fraud Charges SBF Trial, Day 9: Nishad Singh Describes Former FTX CEO as a Bully and Big Spender SBF Trial, Day 10: Defense Struggles to Discredit Nishad Singh's Testimony SBF Trial, Day 11: How Alameda Got FTX Into a $9 Billion Hole SBF Trial, Day 12: Former FTX General Counsel Speaks Out Against SBF Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors? Why These Lawyers Say It's Over for SBF-But His Only Hail Mary Is to Testify Here's How Sam Bankman-Fried's High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried's Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Sam Bankman-Fried's defense strategy in his trial is coming into focus as his legal team seeks to reframe the narrative around his actions at FTX. The defense aims to raise reasonable doubt by challenging key witnesses' testimonies and sowing doubt in their credibility, but faces hurdles in piecing together a cohesive story as the prosecution's case remains strong.Link to story: SBF Trial: For Once, Bankman-Fried's Lawyer Lands a PunchSign up for The SBF Trial NewsletterCredits: Danny Nelson, Nikhilesh De, Nick Baker, Sam Kessler and Wondercraft AI VoiceSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this day in legal history in 1929, the Privy Council of the United Kingdom declared women officially “persons” under the laws of Canada. Which is good, that's a good thing to do, generally. People should be persons. On October 18, 1929, a landmark decision by the Privy Council of the United Kingdom fundamentally altered the legal status of women in Canada. On this day, the Privy Council overturned a ruling made by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Edwards v. Canada. The case was initiated by Emily Murphy, the first female magistrate in the British Empire, and four other women—Henrietta Muir Edwards, Irene Parlby, Louise McKinney, and Nellie McClung—who collectively came to be known as the Famous Five. A lawyer had challenged Murphy's right to preside over a court on the grounds that she wasn't a "person" under Canadian law, leading the Famous Five to challenge this narrow interpretation of the term "persons" as outlined in the British North America Acts, the governing laws of Canada at the time.The Supreme Court of Canada initially ruled against the Famous Five, upholding the traditional interpretation that excluded women from the definition of "persons." This decision mirrored societal prejudices that marginalized women, relegating them to domestic roles and barring them from public life. However, the Privy Council of the United Kingdom, which served as Canada's final court of appeal at the time, reversed this ruling. They declared that the exclusion of women from public offices was a "relic of days more barbarous than ours," offering a more progressive and inclusive interpretation.Lord Sankey, who delivered the Privy Council's judgment, questioned why the term "persons" should not include women, framing it as a matter of logical and moral imperative. This decision dramatically expanded the range of professional and public opportunities available to women in Canada and had ripple effects across the globe, inspiring movements for gender equality.Today, October 18 is celebrated as Persons Day in Canada, marking the victory of the Famous Five and commemorating the broader fight for gender equality. The decision serves as an enduring reminder for legal scholars, activists, and students about the power of the legal system to redefine societal norms and advance human rights.The issue of the state-and-local tax (SALT) deduction cap, instituted by the GOP in 2017, is becoming a contentious point in the upcoming elections, particularly for blue-state Republicans. The cap limited the SALT deduction to $10,000 and was initially opposed by several House Republicans from high-tax states. Although many of those opposing Republicans are no longer in office, a new batch of lawmakers from blue states is fighting to restore the full SALT deduction, albeit without success so far. This situation is giving Democrats an advantage, as candidates vow to make the removal of the SALT cap a priority if elected.Democrats' message that Republicans are responsible for a tax hike has resonated in previous elections and appears to be effective again. Republican representatives such as Mike Garcia of California have admitted that winning would be easier if their party agreed to lift the cap. The upcoming elections are critical for future tax policy discussions, as many elements of the 2017 tax law, including the SALT cap, are set to expire in 2025.By way of brief background, the SALT cap deduction refers to the limitation placed on the amount of state and local taxes (SALT) that can be deducted from a filer's federal income tax. Implemented as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the cap is currently set at $10,000 for both single filers and married couples filing jointly. The SALT cap has been a point of debate, as it disproportionately affects taxpayers in states with higher income and property taxes–those states where more folks are likely to be exceeding $10,000 in property tax.Democrats have successfully used the SALT issue to gain an edge in previous elections, unseating Republicans who opposed the 2017 tax law due to the cap. Some candidates have characterized the 2017 law as a "weaponization of the tax code" against Democratic states. However, it's worth noting that not all Democrats are united in removing the cap. Progressive Democrats argue that the SALT deduction disproportionately benefits the wealthy and have resisted attempts to eliminate it from the Build Back Better legislation.Even as some Republican candidates try to align their party's stance with raising or eliminating the SALT cap, they face internal resistance. The issue has even stalled GOP efforts to pass tax bills, as some refuse to vote for any package that doesn't address the SALT cap. As it stands, the SALT cap issue remains a potent weapon for Democrats, particularly in high-tax states, and could significantly influence the electoral outcomes in the 2024 elections.SALT Cap Haunts GOP House Candidates as Democrats Turn TablesThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has notably excluded environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing from its focus areas for 2024, a shift from previous years when it was listed as a priority. The agency's Division of Examinations priorities for the year did not make any direct mention of ESG, even though the topic was a key area of scrutiny in reports for 2021, 2022, and 2023. An SEC spokesperson clarified that the published priorities for 2024 are "not exhaustive" and other issues could still be addressed.This change comes as the SEC seems to be distancing itself from the ESG label in the context of corporate disclosures. An agency official mentioned that the commission is focusing more on "emergent risks" rather than using the ESG terminology. The label itself has come under scrutiny and has been politicized, leading companies like BlackRock and McDonald's to drop or downplay the term.For 2024, the SEC has shifted its focus to anti-money laundering controls, cryptocurrency, and cybersecurity. Despite this shift, it's worth noting that the SEC's Climate and ESG Task Force has been active in enforcement, settling cases with Goldman Sachs, Bank of New York Mellon, and Deutsche Bank over allegations of improper ESG investment claims and procedural failures. The SEC's deprioritizing of ESG in its 2024 exam priorities does not necessarily signal an abandonment of oversight in this area but indicates a shift in the regulatory landscape.SEC Drops ESG From List of Compliance Priorities in 2024Google has requested a California federal court to dismiss a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging that the tech giant's data scraping activities for training its AI systems violate people's privacy and property rights. The company argues that using public data is essential for training AI technologies like its chatbot Bard. Google contends that the lawsuit could significantly harm not just its services but also the development of generative AI as a whole. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco by eight unnamed individuals, accuses Google of improperly using content from social media and other Google platforms for AI training.The suit is part of a broader trend of legal complaints against tech companies for allegedly misusing various types of content, such as books, visual art, and personal data, for AI training without permission. Google's general counsel, Halimah DeLaine Prado, dismissed the lawsuit as "baseless," stating that U.S. law permits the use of public information to create new beneficial uses. She also refuted allegations that the company uses non-public information from services like Gmail for AI training without consent.The lawsuit covers a wide array of content, from photos on dating websites to Spotify playlists and TikTok videos. One plaintiff, described as a best-selling author and investigative journalist, claimed Google copied her book to train its chatbot. Google responded that such use falls under the fair use doctrine of copyright law and criticized the lawsuit for lacking specific details on how the plaintiffs were harmed.Google says data-scraping lawsuit would take 'sledgehammer' to generative AI | ReutersIn the ongoing fraud trial of Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of the now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, defense lawyers are challenging the portrayal of the company's investments as "reckless and frivolous." This comes after testimony from Nishad Singh, FTX's former engineering chief, who described the company's spending on marketing and celebrity endorsements as excessive. Singh, who has pleaded guilty to fraud and is cooperating with prosecutors, testified that he thought FTX could survive despite a $13 billion shortfall in customer funds, a point that could support Bankman-Fried's defense.Bankman-Fried is in his third trial week, facing charges related to allegedly looting billions from FTX customer funds for various investments and political donations. He has pleaded not guilty. His lawyer, Mark Cohen, pressed Singh on the business benefits of marketing expenditures, potentially framing them as good-faith business decisions rather than fraud.Singh also testified about a deal FTX had with investment firm K5, which he had previously described as "toxic" for the company's culture. Cohen pointed out that K5 helped with more than just celebrity endorsements; it also assisted in investing in a tequila brand run by a celebrity. A lawsuit against K5 alleges that a Bankman-Fried-controlled company used $214 million in FTX funds to buy a stake in celebrity Kendall Jenner's 818 Tequila brand, valued at just $2.94 million at the time.Bankman-Fried's defense maintains that while he made mistakes in running FTX, he never intended to defraud anyone. Jurors have also heard from other former executives who have pleaded guilty to fraud and are cooperating with the prosecution. One significant point came when Singh acknowledged buying a $3.7 million home using FTX customer funds, stating he was "ashamed" and had agreed to forfeit the property as part of his plea agreement.Sam Bankman-Fried's lawyer says FTX investments were not 'reckless' | ReutersA California state judge has ruled that the $90 million legal dispute between Elon Musk and law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz should go to arbitration rather than be settled in court. Judge Richard Ulmer agreed with Wachtell's argument that both parties had "clearly and unmistakably" agreed to let an arbitrator decide on the claims subject to arbitration. Elon Musk, who renamed Twitter to X after acquiring it, had filed a lawsuit against Wachtell to recover $90 million in fees, accusing the law firm of receiving an "improper bonus payment" that violated its fiduciary and ethical duties.The judge's decision to compel arbitration was made without objection from either party, and the merits of Musk's claims were not addressed in this ruling. Wachtell, which represented Twitter in the acquisition deal, has denied Musk's allegations. A spokesperson for Wachtell declined to comment on the ruling, and attorneys for Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.In the lawsuit, Musk claimed that Twitter executives "ran up the tab" by designating large amounts of money as "success" or "project" fees for law firms involved in the deal. Musk argued that Wachtell unfairly profited from the transaction. In response, Wachtell stated that Twitter's board had approved their fee, arguing that they had facilitated a deal ensuring "billions in value for Twitter's stockholders." The case is known as X Corp v Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in the San Francisco Superior Court.Elon Musk's Twitter fee fight with law firm Wachtell belongs in arbitration, judge says | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Live from The Comedy Cellar in Las Vegas: BETWEEN THE SETS with Mark Cohen. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/michaelyoshow/support

As the trial progresses into its second phase, defense attorney Mark Cohen's cross-examination of witnesses like BlockFi CEO Zac Prince has so far failed to substantially undermine the prosecution's case against Sam Bankman-Fried. The defense continues to argue that FTX's terms of service, specifically regarding customer funds and obligations, may not support the misappropriation claims, but the prosecution maintains that misappropriation occurred when Bankman-Fried breached a fiduciary duty and made material misrepresentations, suggesting that the defense's argument may not fully address the allegations.Link to story: Crypto Lender BlockFi Believed Alameda Was Solvent Given Balance Sheet It Was Shown, CEO TestifiesSign up for The SBF Trial NewsletterCredits: Marc Hochstein, Nikhilesh De and Wondercraft AI VoiceSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Day seven of Sam Bankman-Fried's criminal trial saw the defense team unable to discredit Caroline Ellison, despite multiple attempts. The defense's questions often seemed aimless, failing to draw any substantial conclusions. Ellison remained steadfast, revealing that SBF had plans to buy Telegram around the time Alameda "borrowed" $14 billion of FTX customer money. Defense attorney Mark Cohen tried to portray Ellison as the one in charge of Alameda, but she clarified that SBF was the ultimate decision-maker. Ellison also disclosed that she had considered resigning from Alameda but was persuaded by SBF to stay, emphasizing his control over the firm. The day continued with testimony from Christian Drappi, a former Alameda employee, who corroborated Ellison's account. Zac Prince, founder of the bankrupt crypto lending firm BlockFi, briefly took the stand, setting the stage for his testimony to continue the next day. Catch up on Unchained's previous coverage:  Sam Bankman-Fried Trial: Here's Everything That Happened So Far SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF's Family SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied' While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable' SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF's Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda's Special Privileges SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison? SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life' Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors? Here's How Sam Bankman-Fried's High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried's Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect In the SBF Case, Elite Corruption Is What's Really on Trial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On the eighth day of the SBF trial, former BlockFi CEO Zac Prince took the stand, serving as a strong witness for the defense, while offering a detailed look into how Alameda Research's borrowing from FTX differed from traditional crypto lending, and the impact of FTX's and Alameda's collapse on BlockFi, which subsequently filed for bankruptcy. The defense team tried to pin BlockFi's loans to Alameda on BlockFi executives ignoring advice from its own credit team, but Prince twice corrected defense attorney Mark Cohen that, for the document in question, the executives did follow the advice of their credit team. The defense also tried to raise the notion that BlockFi would have declared bankruptcy no matter what had happened with FTX and Alameda, but Prince also held his ground that the collapse of SBF's empire resulted in BlockFi's own bankruptcy. Catch up on Unchained's previous coverage:  Sam Bankman-Fried Trial: Here's Everything That Happened So Far SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF's Family SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied' While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable' SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF's Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda's Special Privileges SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison? SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life' Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors? Here's How Sam Bankman-Fried's High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried's Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect In the SBF Case, Elite Corruption Is What's Really on Trial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

During the cross-examination of Caroline Ellison, the lead attorney, Mark Cohen, failed to establish his expected point that Ellison may have been more responsible for the collapse of FTX than his client, Sam Bankman-Fried. Cohen's questioning also did not significantly undermine Ellison's credibility, and he missed opportunities to delve into certain aspects of the case, ultimately leaving the defense's strategy unclear and raising questions about their ability to challenge the prosecution's narrative of Bankman-Fried's actions in taking funds from customers and investors.Link to story: SBF Trial: Defense Counsel's Cross-Examination of Star Prosecution Witness MeanderedSign up for The SBF Trial NewsletterCredits: Danny Nelson, Nick Baker, Nikhilesh De and Wondercraft AI VoiceSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this day in legal history, October 11, 1872, Chief Justice Harlan Stone was born – but he wasn't born the Chief Justice. He was appointed much later when he was an adult. Harlan Fiske Stone was an American jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1925 to 1941 and then as the 12th Chief Justice of the United States from 1941 until his death in 1946. Born on October 11, 1872, in Chesterfield, New Hampshire, Stone was initially a law professor and later the dean at Columbia Law School. He was appointed by President Calvin Coolidge to the Supreme Court and was later elevated to Chief Justice by Franklin D. Roosevelt.One of Stone's significant contributions to American jurisprudence came in the case of International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1945). In this landmark decision, the mere name of which gives anyone who attended law school hives, Stone formulated the "minimum contacts" test, which has become a cornerstone in the area of personal jurisdiction in civil cases. The ruling clarified the circumstances under which an out-of-state corporation could be subject to the jurisdiction of local courts, thereby modernizing jurisdictional rules to fit a growing national economy.Stone is perhaps best known for his "Footnote Four" in the landmark case of United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938), which laid the groundwork for the modern tiers of judicial scrutiny and the protection of minority rights. He also authored the majority opinion in the case of United States v. Darby Lumber Co. (1941), which upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act and confirmed Congress's power to regulate labor conditions.Another case that drew significant attention during Stone's tenure was Korematsu v. United States (1944). Although Stone did not write the majority opinion, he was part of the court that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. This decision has been widely criticized for its stance on civil liberties and is often cited as a low point in the Court's history. Stone's own views on the case have been the subject of much scholarly debate, given his generally liberal leanings on civil rights issues.Stone was known for his judicial integrity and liberal jurisprudence, often siding with Justices Louis Brandeis and Benjamin Cardozo on progressive interpretations of the Constitution. His tenure as Chief Justice was marked by a number of key decisions that expanded civil liberties and federal power, shaping American constitutional law for generations to come.The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from 12 Republican-led states challenging the Biden administration's estimates for the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions. The high court left in place a federal appeals court decision, stating that the states, led by Missouri, lacked the legal standing to sue as they hadn't suffered a concrete injury. The Biden administration's estimates are intended to guide federal agencies in assessing the climate impact of various projects and in formulating new regulations. These estimates could influence a wide range of sectors, including oil and gas, agriculture, and construction. The decision follows a previous Supreme Court action that blocked an attempt to reinstate former President Trump's less stringent cost-estimation policy.Supreme Court Rejects GOP-Led States on Biden Climate EstimatesThe U.S. Supreme Court has chosen not to review the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) decision to reject Avail Vapor's application for marketing flavored e-cigarettes. Avail Vapor had argued that the FDA altered its application process for new tobacco products at the last minute, leading to a 99% rejection rate for e-cigarette applications. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit had previously sided with the FDA, stating that Avail failed to demonstrate that its products offered benefits to adults that outweighed the risks to young people. Avail contends that many adult smokers use e-cigarettes as a quitting aid. FDA Win on Flavored E-Cigarettes Won't Be Undone by JusticesIn an unusual legal move, Judge Jerry E. Smith of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit added what he called the "opinion that should have been issued" to his dissent in a death penalty case. The majority decision had maintained a pause on a Texas man's scheduled execution, a decision Smith labeled as "grave error." Instead of elaborating on his dissent, Smith attached an opinion styled as a majority ruling, even including the names of the other two judges on the panel. Texas prosecutors later cited Smith's opinion in their request to the Supreme Court to proceed with the execution, which was subsequently granted.Legal experts have noted that this approach is atypical. Tad Bartlett, an attorney who has reviewed all of the Fifth Circuit's decisions over the past three years, said he had never seen a dissenting opinion formatted this way. He speculated that Smith's opinion might have initially been a draft that became a dissent when it was clear he didn't have the majority support. Given the expedited nature of death penalty cases, Smith may have retained the original formatting to save time.The majority ruling indicated that another judge on the panel, Judge James E. Graves Jr., would issue his own concurring opinion, which was later included in an amended majority opinion. Stacy Rogers Sharp, an adjunct professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, warned that Smith's unusual approach could blur the lines between what is or is not the law, potentially undermining the majority opinion.Fifth Circuit Judge Adds Alternate Majority Opinion to Dissent (2)Legal experts predict that the U.S. Supreme Court may narrow or even overturn the Chevron Doctrine, a precedent that has significantly shaped the modern administrative state. The doctrine, established in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, allows courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Bertrall Ross, a law professor, suggests that the Court is also likely to use the major questions and non-delegation doctrines to further limit agency power. A ruling that diminishes Chevron deference would require courts to interpret statutes more frequently and could create additional legislative work for Congress.Professor Allison Orr Larsen believes that the Court may limit Chevron deference to cases involving "genuine ambiguities" in statutory text. Ross adds that Congress might have to revisit statutes regularly if agencies can't resolve ambiguities. He also notes that the Court's recent decisions indicate a preference for major political issues to be handled by Congress rather than agencies. Meaghan VerGow, a legal partner, points out that another case, SEC v. Jarkesy, raises questions about the president's ability to remove administrative law judges, which could potentially create due process issues.Avid fans of Minimum Competence will remember we did a special Max Min episode on both Chevron Deference and the Major Questions Doctrine. Expect Narrowing of Chevron Doctrine, High Court Watchers SayThe fraud trial of Sam Bankman-Fried, related to the collapse of his FTX cryptocurrency exchange, is set to continue with further testimony from Caroline Ellison, a key witness and former co-head of Bankman-Fried's hedge fund, Alameda Research. Ellison has already testified that she was part of a multi-billion-dollar conspiracy led by Bankman-Fried to defraud FTX customers, investors, and lenders. She is among three former insiders who have pleaded guilty to fraud and are cooperating with prosecutors. Ellison revealed that the hedge fund used about $10 billion in FTX customer funds to repay debts and make investments.She also stated that Bankman-Fried, who is her former boss and occasional romantic partner, was indifferent to the risks associated with Alameda's lending and investment strategies. Prosecutors allege that Bankman-Fried misused billions in customer funds to support Alameda, purchase real estate, and donate over $100 million to U.S. political campaigns. Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to the charges, arguing that while he made mistakes, he did not intend to steal funds.In his opening statement, defense lawyer Mark Cohen urged jurors to question the credibility of cooperating witnesses like Ellison, suggesting they might be reinterpreting past decisions to appear more nefarious. Gary Wang, FTX's former technology chief, also testified that Bankman-Fried falsely claimed FTX was stable as it faced a surge in withdrawal demands. The trial, which could last up to six weeks, is also expected to feature testimony from another cooperating witness, former FTX engineering chief Nishad Singh.Sam Bankman-Fried's trial to resume with more testimony from Caroline Ellison | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

For this week's episode, Chain Reaction (and Jacquelyn) did a crossover episode with Alex Wilhelm, editor in chief of TechCrunch+ and co-host of Equity, TechCrunch's podcast focused on the business of startups.The highly anticipated criminal trial for Sam Bankman-Fried, former CEO of now-bankrupt crypto exchange FTX, started on Tuesday to determine whether he's guilty of seven counts of fraud and conspiracy. Jacquelyn has been on the ground at the Southern District of New York court house, listening in to the trial in the same room as Bankman-Fried, so there was lots to talk about. We dove deep into what transpired the first two days of Bankman-Fried's trial, as well as who the jurors are, the first two witnesses and who else is expected to speak. We also got into the nitty gritty details, which you can't read about on a transcript.Chain Reaction comes out every Thursday at 12:00 p.m. ET, so be sure to subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favorite pod platform to keep up with the action.

On this day in legal history, October 5, 1941, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis died at the age of 84. Louis Brandeis was born on November 13, 1856, in Louisville, Kentucky. He graduated from Harvard Law School at the age of 20 with the highest grade point average in the school's history. In 1890, he gained recognition for developing the "right to privacy" concept through an article in the Harvard Law Review. Brandeis was a prominent figure in the antitrust movement and was known for his resistance to monopolies, particularly in the New England railroad sector. He also advised Woodrow Wilson and was critical of large banks and powerful corporations in his writings.Brandeis became active in the Zionist movement, viewing it as a solution to antisemitism in Europe and Russia. He was often referred to as the "People's Lawyer" and took cases without pay to focus on broader issues. He set a new precedent in evidence presentation with the "Brandeis brief," which utilized expert testimony from various professions. In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson nominated him to the U.S. Supreme Court, making him the first Jewish member. His nomination was met with significant opposition but was eventually confirmed by the Senate.During his tenure on the Supreme Court from 1916 to 1939, Brandeis became one of the most influential justices in history. He was known for his strong defenses of freedom of speech and the right to privacy. However, he has been criticized for not addressing issues related to African-Americans and for supporting racial segregation in some cases. Brandeis retired from the Supreme Court on February 13, 1939, and passed away on October 5, 1941, in Washington, D.C.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is set to hear a case concerning Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, and its alleged preference for hiring workers on H-1B visas. The case, brought by appellant Purushothaman Rajaram, questions whether U.S. citizens are a protected class under Section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act. A federal district court previously dismissed the case, stating that the act does not cover "reverse discrimination" claims. Rajaram's lawyers argue that Section 1981 should be broadly interpreted to include U.S. citizens, while Meta contends that the law has traditionally been applied narrowly to race or alien status.The case also brings into focus Meta's hiring practices. The company was one of the top H-1B employers in fiscal year 2022, with over 1,500 approved petitions for new workers. Rajaram, a naturalized U.S. citizen, claims that Meta's hiring policies favor workers on H-1B visas over equally or more qualified U.S. citizens. If Rajaram wins, it could discourage companies from prioritizing H-1B workers over U.S. citizens.The Department of Justice and the Department of Labor have previously scrutinized Meta's H-1B hiring practices. The company settled those claims by paying over $14 million in civil penalties without admitting any wrongdoing. Rajaram's lawsuit aims to address citizenship discrimination in hiring more broadly, not just positions earmarked for visa workers.Experts note that the structure of the H-1B program itself may contribute to competition between visa holders and U.S. workers. Companies have little incentive to pay H-1B workers more than the prevailing wage, leading them to file as many petitions as possible for minimally qualified candidates. The case began with oral arguments yesterday. Meta's H-1B Hiring Spurs Ninth Circuit Look at Citizenship BiasA federal judge has ordered the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to withdraw a Trump-era rule concerning copay assistance programs. The rule had been challenged by patient advocacy groups, including the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute and the Diabetes Leadership Council, who claimed it allowed health plans to increase out-of-pocket prescription drug costs. Judge John D. Bates stated that the rule conflicted with the Affordable Care Act's definition of "cost-sharing" and must be set aside.The 2020 rule had stated that pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), who manage prescription drug benefits for insurers, were not required to count drugmaker copay assistance toward patients' out-of-pocket costs. The patient groups argued that this allowed PBMs and health plans to collect funds from both patients and drugmakers without using the money to ease the financial burden on patients.The ruling is seen as a victory for these patient advocacy groups, who filed the lawsuit in August 2022. Carl Schmid, the executive director of the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute, expressed satisfaction with the court's decision and called on the Biden administration to enforce it immediately.The advocacy groups are backed by pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co., and Merck & Co. While these companies can offer assistance to patients in commercial plans, such programs are prohibited in government-funded health insurance due to the Anti-Kickback Statute.The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had previously argued that manufacturer coupons could add long-term costs to the healthcare system, outweighing the short-term benefits. Both the Department of Justice, representing CMS and HHS, and a CMS spokesperson declined to comment on the ruling. The case is titled HIV & Hepatitis Policy Inst. v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. and was filed on September 29, 2023.Judge Strikes Down Trump-Era Medicare Copay Assistance Rule (1)The trial of Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of the collapsed FTX cryptocurrency exchange, has begun with both sides presenting differing views on the reasons behind the company's failure. Bankman-Fried is accused of using FTX customer funds to support his hedge fund, Alameda Research, as well as for personal expenditures like luxury real estate and political donations. He has pleaded not guilty to these charges. His defense lawyer, Mark Cohen, portrayed him as a "math nerd" from MIT who may have overlooked risk management but did not engage in theft.Prosecutor Thane Rehn, however, argued that Bankman-Fried took more than $10 billion from FTX customers and used the funds to build his empire through fraudulent means. Rehn stated that the defendant "doubled down" on risky investments when Alameda began losing money. The prosecution plans to call three former associates of Bankman-Fried, all of whom have pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate, to testify against him.The defense suggested that these witnesses might retrospectively portray Bankman-Fried's decisions as deceitful, even though they had agreed with those decisions at the time. The jury for the trial includes a diverse group of individuals, including a retired investment banker, a school librarian, and a train conductor. Bankman-Fried has been in detention since August 11 for likely tampering with witnesses.The trial comes nearly a year after the collapse of FTX, which had a significant impact on financial markets and damaged Bankman-Fried's reputation. It promises to offer an inside look into the operations of a cryptocurrency exchange and the legal boundaries within which such businesses operate.Sam Bankman-Fried trial jurors hear competing explanations for FTX collapse | ReutersJudge Arthur Engoron, overseeing Donald Trump's civil fraud trial in New York, expressed frustration with Trump's legal team for what he termed as "ridiculous" and redundant questioning of a witness. The trial is centered on allegations by the New York attorney general's office that Trump inflated his net worth by billions to secure better loan and insurance terms. Engoron, who is the sole decider of the case's outcome, has already disciplined Trump's lawyers for making "frivolous" arguments.Earlier, Engoron had imposed a gag order on public comments about court staff after Trump criticized the judge's top law clerk on social media. Trump, who has been present in court, has consistently attacked both the judge and New York Attorney General Letitia James, labeling them as "corrupt" and the case as a "sham."Last week, Engoron ruled that Trump, his two adult sons, and 10 of his companies had committed fraud. He revoked the business certificates for key assets, including Trump Tower and 40 Wall Street, and said he would appoint receivers for their dissolution. Trump's lawyers have appealed this decision.The trial mainly concerns the assessment of damages, with James seeking at least $250 million in fines and various bans against Trump and his sons from conducting business in New York. The trial is expected to continue until mid-December. Trump also faces other legal challenges, including four criminal indictments and a civil damages trial scheduled for January. He has denied wrongdoing in all cases.Judge chides Donald Trump lawyer's 'ridiculous' questioning in civil fraud trial | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Ever wondered about the implications of 'no comment' during a media frenzy?  Our enlightening podcast with Mark Cohen, Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, and Principal, Cohen-Fyfe Communications, is set to shed some light on this.  We dissect the fallout of negative press and how the refusal to engage can paint an unintentional picture of guilt.  Moreover, we provide a comprehensive review of the September's top news stories in the hospice and palliative care space, including the CMS requirements on staffing minimums in long-term care, public opinion on nursing homes, and the dire need for more staff to carry out state-level inspections.Are you up-to-speed with the latest hot topics in healthcare?  We've got you covered! This episode takes a deep dive into some riveting discussions around healthcare trends, such as the potential of hospital-at-home programs and the role of Medicare Advantage in homecare services. We call out the complex web of regulatory issues impacting hospice and home health care. Furthermore, we examine the most expensive states to die in and the dominance of Epic in the hospital EHR market.Lastly, how well do you understand your market and competition?  Together with Mark, we explore the importance of market potential and competition.  We stress the significance of competitive intelligence and staying ahead of the game, drawing wisdom from Mary Ellen's insightful quote.   Tune in and gain insights that are need-to-know for you as a healthcare leader.Special Guest:Mark Cohen, Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, and Principal, Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsTCNtalks Host:Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of Teleios Collaborative Networkwww.teleioscn.orgTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

Ever wondered how important effective communication is within hospice and palliative care? In this fascinating discussion with our esteemed guest, Mark Cohen, we unravel this mystery, highlighting the indispensability of proficient writing resources in hospice organizations. Mark offers insightful suggestions on acquiring these resources, even in resource-constrained times, and we explore the pyramid style of journalism, identifying poorly written press releases, and the need to champion excellent writing.We embark on a journey into the art of summarization, understanding how the 'need to know' concept can boost efficiency within your organization. As we scrutinize the 73 flagged articles this month and my top 10 themes, we underscore the significance of staying abreast of the news. Next, we focus on elder care and staffing in hospice, illuminating former President Jimmy Carter's remarkable six-month tenure on hospice care. We decode the latest Medicare regulations, hospice program integrity recommendations, and analyze how the current market is impacting skilled nursing facilities, hospitals, and nursing homes.Mark graciously shares his wisdom on how to stay current with hospice news and get access to the articles we discuss. We reflect once more on the transformative impact of former President Jimmy Carter's hospice care milestone on changing perceptions within the field. Drawing our enlightening conversation to a close, we underscore the power of focusing on the good to enhance growth. Get ready for a compelling discussion that could change how you see hospice and palliative care!Guest: Mark Cohen, Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, and Principal, Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsHost: Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of TCNhttps://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast/top-news-stories-of-the-month-of-august-2023Teleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

A landmark science and technology agreement between the U.S. and China has narrowly escaped termination. Rather than renewing it for another five-year period, the Biden administration made a last-minute decision to extend it for six months. At its core, science thrives on collaboration. Researchers come together driven by shared interests, their efforts directed toward advancing humanity. In a world increasingly molded by technological progress, can we truly afford to let political tensions overshadow scientific cooperation, especially between two scientific powerhouses like the U.S. and China? Host Zhao Ying is joined by Zhao Hai, Director of International Political Studies at the National Institute for Global Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Caroline Wagner, Professor at The Ohio State University; Tian Xia, Professor of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles; and Mark Cohen, Asia IP Project director at the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.

How The #1 Mortgage Broker MARK COHEN Did $15 BILLION In Volume.    In this episode of The Loan Officer Wealth Podcast, we are joined by Mark Cohen, the #1 Mortgage Broker in the Country according to the Scotsman Guide from Cohen Financial Group! Mark has originated over 25,500 loans totaling more than 15.75 billion dollars in volume  Loan Officer Wealth Website: https://loanofficerwealth.com/   THE LOAN OFFICER WEALTH PODCAST WITH CHRIS JOHNSTONE | Ep. 111 Guest - Mark Cohen of https://www.cohenfinancialgroup.com/   ➡️ Connect with Mark (Los Angeles, California) Cohen Financial - https://www.cohenfinancialgroup.com/ LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-cohen-aaa4a45/   Watch as Chris speaks with Mark about… Building his extremely successful mortgage business and becoming the #1 Mortgage Broker in the USA Managing communications and relationships with past clients and referral partners Strategies that loan officers can implement into their own business and MORE!   Watch the full episode here: https://youtu.be/kF_p_cQGaFk   #LoanOfficer #Podcast #MortgageMarketing #MortgageBroker #MortgageLender #LoanOfficerPodcast #MarkCohen

Have you ever wondered about the behind-the-scenes of hospice care and the innovative approaches being taken to improve patient and caregiver wellness?  This episode might just be what you're looking for!  Joined by our guest, Mark Cohen, we take you through July's hospice care news, reflecting on a quieter month compared to June.  Mark shares his unique hospice story which began in 1995, and the importance of field-shadowing for admin staff.  We also discuss the declining coverage of physician-assisted suicide, medical aid in dying, and medical marijuana legalization. Mark identifies ten themes from the recent news that we explore in detail.  These range from futuristic articles to innovative remembrance services.  Mark and I also delve into the impact of diminished news coverage on the hospice sector and the state of news pitching.  The discussion takes an interesting turn as we look at the emerging attention to hospice care for the urban homeless population, and legislation like the Palliative Care and Hospice Education Training Act. There's more!  Mark and I highlight top stories that have made headlines, including abuse allegations against Papa and the rising influence of private equity in healthcare. We also talk about the pressing staffing challenges in hospice care and the innovative solutions being implemented to address them.   As we conclude, we reflect on the effects of diminished news coverage on the hospice sector and the current state of news pitching.  Trust us, you do not want to miss this episode if you're looking to stay informed about the latest in hospice care news.TCNtalks Guest:Mark Cohen,  Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, and Principal, Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsTCNtalks Host:Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of Teleios Collaborative NetworkTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

On this day in history, July 24th, 1929, the Kellogg-Briand Pact took effect. It was ambitious, as pacts go, because get this – it was an international agreement outlawing war as an implement of foreign policy. In addition to everything else, in typical Nazi fashion, the Third Reich just brazenly ignored the agreement. The Kellogg-Briand Pact, also known as the Pact of Paris, was an international agreement for peace first established in 1928. The formal name for the pact was the General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy, which committed signatory states to refrain from using war as a means to resolve disputes or conflicts of any origin. Initially signed in the wake of World War I by the United States, France, and Germany, it was later adopted by many other states. The pact was crafted outside the auspices of the League of Nations and was spearheaded by U.S. Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg and French foreign minister Aristide Briand.However, the pact's effectiveness and overall impact have been widely debated. Critics point out its inability to prevent a little thing called World War II and the lack of a mechanism for enforcement. Despite its ambitious goals, it was often seen as irrelevant and ineffective, criticized for its legalistic and moralistic tone and its limited influence on foreign policy.Nevertheless, the Kellogg-Briand Pact wasn't entirely without success or influence. After the Second World War, it provided the legal basis for the concept of a “crime against peace,” which was used in the trials and executions of top Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals. Additionally, it paved the way for similar provisions in the Charter of the United Nations and other treaties, contributing to a more proactive American foreign policy. It also arguably contributed to a significant decrease in declared wars post-1945.Snark aside, the agreement broke new ground. The idea that a multilateral treaty could even attempt to outlaw wars of conquest and, in so doing, render violators pariah states even if war itself couldn't be forcibly stopped, was a relatively novel concept in the wake of the 19th century's widespread empire-building. That general idea remains the basis for things like the United Nations and NATO, so good on you Kellogg and Briand. The Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928Starting from August 1, 2023, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will permanently allow employers to verify employment eligibility remotely, as per new regulations. The move comes just before the expiry of temporary COVID-19 era flexibility for employment verification on August 30. The option is exclusively for employers in good standing with the federal E-Verify system. According to the rule, employers must inspect copies of I-9 documents within three days of an employee's start date, verify authenticity via live video, and acknowledge remote verification on the I-9 form. The rule will not be retroactive and will only apply to new hires post-August 1. In conjunction, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will release an updated Form I-9 for use from August 1, designed for compatibility with mobile devices. Representatives from the Society for Human Resource Management and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have hailed this decision as beneficial for the modern workforce and a facilitator for efficient onboarding.Remote Work Verification Allowed for New Hires Per DHS Rule (2)Attorneys for Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange, have denied allegations of witness tampering by prosecutors. The lawyers have agreed to a gag order, despite rejecting claims that Bankman-Fried's interactions with a New York Times reporter constituted witness tampering. These events followed prosecutors' attempts to restrict Bankman-Fried and his allies from making public statements that could potentially impact the case. Previously, FTX, which was valued at $32 billion, filed for bankruptcy after failing to repay depositors, and Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to fraud. Bankman-Fried's lawyer, Mark Cohen, confirmed that his client had shared personal documents with the New York Times, including writings by former colleague Caroline Ellison, who is cooperating with the U.S. government–let's call her a witness for simplicity's sake. The New York Times published an article featuring excerpts from Ellison's personal documents provided to the paper by SBF, including correspondence in which she expressed frustration with the job and over her breakup with SBF. Ellison has pleaded guilty to defrauding investors and is cooperating with prosecutors. SBF continues to deny wrongdoing.FTX's Bankman-Fried denies witness tampering, accepts gag orderUnited Parcel Service (UPS) is set to resume labor negotiations tomorrow with the Teamsters union, which represents 340,000 UPS employees, in a bid to avoid a strike that could disrupt supply chains and negatively impact the economy. Since April, discussions have been ongoing concerning a contract for UPS's U.S. drivers, package handlers, and loaders, as their current five-year agreement is set to expire on July 31. UPS stressed the urgency of reaching a fair deal that ensures certainty for customers, employees, and businesses nationwide. The Teamsters union is pushing for a five-year contract that enhances pay and full-time jobs, and strengthens protections for workers. While preliminary agreements have been reached on removing a two-tier pay system for delivery drivers and installing air conditioning in delivery vehicles, disputes over pay raises for part-time workers remain unresolved. The talks stalled on July 5, with both parties attributing the deadlock to the other.Just as a quick fun fact, UPS' gross profit for the quarter ending March 31, 2023 was $17.3 billion. Its gross profit for the twelve months ending March 31 was $73 billion.United Parcel Service, Teamsters union to resume labor talks on Tuesday | ReutersNew Jersey is suing the Biden administration in an attempt to halt New York City's plan to impose tolls on vehicles in Manhattan. The plan, intended to reduce congestion and fund mass transit, could see a daily toll of up to $23 charged on vehicles in central Manhattan as early as next year. New Jersey claims in its lawsuit that the federal highway administration's environmental review of the plan was insufficient and overlooked the financial and environmental burdens imposed on New Jersey residents. The state is concerned that the tolls would lead drivers to reroute through New Jersey to avoid the charges, causing environmental, financial, and human impacts. It also points out that New Jersey would not receive money from New Yorkers entering its state. New York City, which holds the record for the most congested traffic in the U.S., estimated in 2022 that the charge would reduce traffic, improve air quality, increase transit use, and generate between $1 billion to $1.5 billion annually, supporting $15 billion in debt financing for mass transit improvement.New Jersey sues to block New York traffic congestion plan | ReutersOmegle.com LLC is aiming for a pre-trial victory in a lawsuit that accuses the anonymous video-chatting platform of enabling a predator in Canada to exploit a minor he encountered on the site. In a motion for summary judgment, Omegle has argued that it did not knowingly assist in the abuse and parts of the suit are time-barred by a statute of limitations. The lawsuit, lodged in 2021, alleges that Omegle is defectively designed due to its failure to prevent child access and ban identified predatory users, thereby indirectly engaging in sex trafficking. Omegle contends that as the plaintiff resides in Michigan, local product liability law, which has a three-year statute of limitations, should apply. It further argues that the sex trafficking claims are inapplicable due to the lack of proof that Omegle was directly involved in a commercial sex trafficking venture. This follows Omegle's unsuccessful attempt to dismiss the lawsuit under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The plaintiff's legal strategy is novel, as it has involved framing the case around product liability to bypass this legislation's protective measures. In other words, they're aiming to treat the site itself as a faulty product – like a toaster that doesn't function properly … if that toaster also enabled child predators to contact victims and the toaster manufacturer didn't do anything to curtail that use. Omegle.com Seeks Summary Judgment in Sex Trafficking LawsuitMaxMin - Section 230 - by Andrew Leahey

My guests today are Mark Fenster of the University of Florida Levin College of Law and Dave Hoffman of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. We're discussing Mark's recent article, How Reputational Nondisclosure Agreements Fail (Or, In Praise of Breach), forthcoming in The Marquette Law Review. Mark Fenster is the Marshall M. Criser Eminent Scholar Chair in Electronic Communications and Administrative Law at the Levin College of Law. His legal research has focused on government transparency, legal intellectual history, and constitutional limits on government regulation. He is the author of the book The Transparency Fix: Secrets, Leaks, and Uncontrollable Government Information (Stanford University Press, 2017), and his articles and essays have appeared in the California Law Review, Michigan Law Review, and the Iowa Law Review, among others. David Hoffman is the William A. Schnader Professor of Law and Deputy Dean at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Professor Hoffman is a widely-cited scholar who focuses his research and teaching on contract law.  His work is typically interdisciplinary, built through collaboration with co-authors from a variety of fields. He has engaged in the national conversation sparked by the #metoo movement, publishing a paper with a (then) Penn Carey Law student that argues that nondisclosure clauses in employment contracts violate public policy.Further Reading:Mark Fenster Bio, University of FloridaDave Hoffman Bio, University of PennsylvaniaMark Fenster, How Reputational Nondisclosure Agreements Fail (Or, In Praise of Breach), SSRNDavid Hoffman & Erik Lampmann, Hushing Contracts  

Ever wondered how the media shapes our understanding of hospice care? Listen in as my guest, Mark Cohen, and I dissect the top stories from the past month. Mark, enlightens us on the intricacies of Marketing, PR, and external communications - essential tools for navigating the news. We scrutinize the whirlwind of dueling offers for a medecist option care and Optum, the controversy over Alive Hospice in Nashville, and the damaging coverage of hospital chain HCA.In this podcast, Chris continues the monthly program that will be airing throughout 2023.  Mark Cohen is the Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, an essential news and issues management briefing published 365 days a year for hospice leaders. He also is Principal of his strategic communications firm, Cohen-Fyfe Communications.  Mark spends hours each day reviewing and abstracting articles that make up his daily news brief, Hospice News Today.  In this monthly podcast Chris and Mark highlight the top 10 news stories of the prior month.  This monthly episode is a great resource for busy hospice and palliative care leaders, staff, and Board.  Mark's perspective is unique given his purview of the volume of articles as he scours 100's of news sources to produce Hospice News Today.  Chris's perspective is what do hospice and palliative care leaders need to know to help lead their organizations and teams today but also what they need to know in order to prepare for tomorrow as well.  Both perspectives make for an enlightening show, so enjoy this podcast as Mark and Chris highlight their picks for the top 10-ish news articles for the past month (along with their honorable mentions that didn't quite make the cut).  Switch gears with us as we plunge into the latest news on physician-assisted suicide, medical aid, and dying. We examine a gamut of developments, from expanded eligibility in Oregon and Vermont to the eye-opening documentary, Last Flight Home. Mark and I also delve into the poignant world of grief and bereavement, offering insights into a variety of personal grief journeys. Hear my perspective from the top of the corporate ladder on the most impactful happenings of June.Fasten your seatbelts as we race through the latest hospice-related news, shedding light on studies that link hospice care to significant savings. We discuss the merits of the Medicare hospice benefit and the projected cost of hospice care by 2032. We shine a spotlight on the importance of dying with dignity and debunk some common myths about death. We also tackle the issue of staffing shortages in nursing homes and the impact of green card processes on this sector. Lastly, we wrap up with a lively chat on leadership quotes and the challenges of fostering effective teamwork. Mark and I are excited to take you on this enlightening journey through the labyrinth of hospice care news, so tune in and join the conversation.This is a great listen.  Join us, this is timely, relevant, and packed with need-to-know information.  Guest:Mark Cohen, Editor & Publisher of Hospice News Today, and Principal, Cohen-Fyfe CommunicationsHost:Chris Comeaux, President / CEO of Teleios Collaborative NetworkQuotes in podcast:"Managing is getting paid for home runs that someone else hits.""Finding good players is easy. Getting them to play as a team is another story."  - Casey StengelTeleios Collaborative Network / https://www.teleioscn.org/tcntalkspodcast

You've seen him on "Louie", "The Sarah Silverman Show", "Make Me Laugh" and doing stand-up on MTV and Comedy Central. And now you get to see him with us.

Tig's guest is her co-star on “Star Trek: Discovery”: actor and singer Anthony Rapp. Anthony is known for his performance in the classic comedy “Dazed & Confused” and originating the role of Mark Cohen in the award-winning rock opera, “Rent.” Tig and Anthony swap stories about preparing to become parents and offer fun suggestions to a mom trying to come up with ideas for her kid's birthday party goody bags. They also advise a listener about how to use comedy to come out of the closet and help a fan embrace her inner “crazy cat lady.” This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp (go to Betterhelp.com/TIG for 10% off the first month of online therapy), Rocket Money (go to RocketMoney.com/tig and start canceling unwanted subscriptions today), Zocdoc (go to Zocdoc.com/TIG to download the app for free), and Indeed (go to indeed.com/TIG to start hiring now). Need advice? Submit your question for Tig at dontasktig.org/contact.

If you have a favorite astromycologist, I'll bet a week's worth of replicator rations that it's Commander Paul Stamets of the USS Discovery. Anthony Rapp, who breathes life into the character, got his big break playing Mark Cohen in the groundbreaking musical Rent. Rapp wrote a memoir about the experience, which he then adapted as a stage musical, telling the story of his journey in Rent through the lens of two tragic deaths that occurred at the time. Now his one-man musical, Without You, is opening off-Broadway, and he joined me to talk about it. Visit withoutyoumusical.com for tickets.

TuongVy Le, partner and head of regulatory & policy at Bain Capital Crypto, discusses how the legal process for Sam Bankman-Fried in the wake of the FTX scandal could play out.  Show highlights: the allegations that Bankman-Fried manipulated the market during the Terra crash the motivations for Bankman-Fried's media appearances what the selection of Mark Cohen as a lawyer says about the potential charges and the case why SBF hasn't been arrested yet how the US investigating the potential involvement of Bahamian government officials could complicate cooperation of an arrest of SBF in the Bahamas why this case is very different from Bernie Madoff's what evidence would be needed to say, legally, that SBF committed fraud the potential outcomes of the legal case for SBF and how many years of prison time he could face Take Unchained's 2022 survey!   Unchained is doing its annual survey. Tell us how you think we're doing and how we could improve, whether it be on the podcast, in the newsletter, or in our premium offering. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!  Thank you to our sponsors! Crypto.com TuongVy : Twitter Episode Links FTX: Unchained: Regulators Investigate Sam Bankman-Fried for Terra-Related Market Manipulation Sam Bankman-Fried Hires Ghislaine Maxwell's Defense Lawyer: Report Investigations:  Reuters: U.S. authorities probe FTX collapse, executives' involvement -sources CoinDesk: California Financial Regulator Announces FTX Investigation Others: CNBC: Former OpenSea employee charged in first-ever NFT insider trading case NYT:  Ex-Coinbase Employee and 2 Others Charged With Insider Trading of Crypto Assets Two former Deutsche Bank traders win their appeal in a Libor manipulation case Previous coverage of Unchained on FTX: The Chopping Block: SBF Wants to Win in the Court of Public Opinion. Will He? Jesse Powell and Kevin Zhou on How FTX and Alameda Lost $10 Billion Is the Collapse of Crypto Lending Over, or Is It Just Starting? Did the Bahamian Government Direct SBF and Gary Wang to Hack FTX? The Chopping Block: Why Lenders Didn't Liquidate Alameda When It Was Underwater  Erik Voorhees and Cobie on Why FTX Loaned Out Customers' Assets The Chopping Block: FTX: The Biggest Collapse in the History of Crypto? Sam Bankman-Fried on How to Prevent the Next Terra and 3AC Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today's blockchain and cryptocurrency news Bitcoin is up slightly at $16,816 Ethereum is up slightly at $1,227 Binance Coin is up slightly at $283 US Financial Services Committee considering a subpoena for SBF. SBF retains Mark Cohen. Binance's bitcoin reserves confirmed by Mazars. Binance says revenues come from trading fees. RTKFT reveals physical/digital shoe. Bitwave raises $15M for crypto tax accounting platform. Koinly cuts 14% of staff. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices