Podcasts about appellant

In 2020 the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Newfoundland and Labrador issued certain orders under the province's Public Health Protection and Promotion Act, in an effort to curtail the spread of COVID-19. These orders restricted travel, by limiting the circumstances in which non-residents were permitted to enter the province. Appellant Kimberley Taylor resides in Nova Scotia. Her mother, a resident of Newfoundland and Labrador, passed away suddenly in 2020. Ms. Taylor sought an exemption from the travel restrictions in order to attend her mother's funeral. Her request was denied. Ms. Taylor brought an application seeking a declaration that the travel restriction orders, and the provision of the Act under which they were issued, were beyond the legislative authority of the province and of no force and effect. Ms. Taylor also argued that the travel restrictions violated her rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador dismissed the application. The application judge held that the legislation at issue was constitutional, but that the right to remain in Canada, protected by s. 6(1) of the Charter, included a right of mobility simpliciter within Canada. The decision to deny Ms. Taylor entry into the province infringed her s. 6(1) right to mobility, but the infringement was justified under s. 1 of the Charter. By the time the appeal and cross-appeal from that judgment came before the Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador, the travel restrictions were no longer in effect. The Court of Appeal declined to hear the appeal and cross-appeal on the basis that they were moot. Argued Date 2025-04-16 Keywords Charter of Rights – Mobility rights – Public health – COVID-19 – Chief medical officer of health issuing orders pursuant to provincial legislation to restrict travel into province during public health emergency – Appellant seeking to enter province to attend funeral – Appellant denied entry – Whether travel restriction order unconstitutional – Whether travel restriction order violates s. 6(1) of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Whether travel restriction order violates s. 6(2)(a) of Charter – Whether s. 6 violation justified by s. 1 of Charter – Whether Court of Appeal correct to reject appeal as moot – Public Health Protection and Promotion Act, S.N.L. 2018, c. P-37.3, s. 28(1)(h). Notes (Newfoundland & Labrador) (Civil) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

An environmental scientist involved in a judicial review against the proposed Ennis Data Centre insists the facility is no closer to coming to fruition despite a recent high court judgement. Last week, Justice Richard Humphreys ruled that An Bord Pleanála's error not to consider a single bat in a barn near the the proposed Tulla Road Campus should not stop the €1.2bn development. This is only the first phase of the judicial review, next the court must decide if planners followed due legal process when assessing environmental impacts, after that it will be referred back to An Bord Pleanála for a new planning decision. Ennis resident and appellant Colin Doyle has been telling Clare FM's Daragh Dolan that he believes the plans are ludicrous.

A talented jazz musician with a mysterious past. Melvin David Rees captivated audiences with his haunting melodies and effortless skill, but behind the stage lights and smoky jazz clubs lurked something far darker. A man of intelligence, charm, and discipline. A man who lived two lives: one in the spotlight, and one in the shadows.From his time as a military musician in Europe to his nights playing in dimly lit clubs around Washington, D.C., Rees moved through life unnoticed, well… until the crimes began. A brutal murder on the side of the road. A family vanishing into the night. A shack filled with disturbing photographs. And a cryptic note that would finally expose him for what he was.Sources: Melvin Davis Rees, Jr., Appellant, v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellee, 341 F.2d 859 (4th Cir. 1965). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/341/859/380776/. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melvin_ReesMelvin Rees - The Sex Beast. By Katherine Ramsland for Crime Library: Criminal Minds and Methods.  https://www.crimelibrary.org/serial_killers/predators/melvin_rees/13.htmlhttps://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/a-serial-killer-preys-upon-a-woman-out-for-a-driveAccess ad-free episodes, bonus content, and get all of the 11:59 Media Podcast library!Access hours of extra content each week, exclusive merch, and early access to new podcasts.Visit https://1159plus.com or https://www.patreon.com/1159media

This week, we explore the life and mysterious death of Mary Pinchot Meyer, a woman with high-profile connections, including John F. Kennedy and the CIA. We'll discuss her tragic 1964 murder, the acquittal of the man charged with the crime, and theories about CIA involvement linked to her affair with JFK and the disappearance of her diary, which may have contained explosive information. Get new episodes a day early and ad free, plus chat episodes, discord access and zoom hangouts at Patreon.com/momsandmysteriespodcast   Thank you to this week's sponsors!   Give your home the refresh it needs with Wayfair. Head to wayfair.com today!  It's time to get your own personal stylist with DailyLook.  Head to DailyLook.com to take your style quiz and use code MOM50 for 50% off your first order.  Indoor cats and indoor humans agree - Pretty Litter helps your house smell fresh and clean. Go to Prettylitter.com/moms  to save 20% on your FIRST order and get a free cat toy. Terms and conditions apply. See site for details.  Give yourself the luxury you deserve with Quince! Go to Quince.com/moms for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.    Lume's Starter Pack is perfect for new customers. It comes with a Solid Stick Deodorant, Cream Tube Deodorant, two free products of your choice (like Mini Body Wash and Deodorant Wipes), and free shipping.As a special offer for listeners, new customers GET 15% ALL Lume products with our exclusive code - and if you combine the 15% off with the already discounted starter pack, that equals over 40% off their Starter Pack! Use code MOMS for 15% off your first purchase at LumeDeodorant.com.  To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://www.advertisecast.com/MomsandMysteriesATrueCrimePodcast.  Listen and subscribe to Melissa's other podcast, Criminality!! It's the podcast for those who love reality TV, true crime, and want to hear all the juicy stories where the two genres intersect. Subscribe and listen here: www.pod.link/criminality    Check-out Moms and Mysteries to find links to our tiktok, youtube, twitter, instagram and more.      Sources:   Raymond Crump, Jr., Appellant, v. Sam Anderson, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail, Appellee, 352 F.2d 649 (D.C. Cir. 1965) Basham, William, PROSECUTOR SETS STAGE IN MEYER…, Washington Star Maxwell, J.T., Crump Case Goes to Jury, Washington Daily News, 1965 Morrow, Two Washington Women, City Journal, 2018 Janney, Peter, The Murder of John Kennedy's Mistress, Part 3, WhoWhatWhy, 2017 Mary Pinchot Meyer, Spartacus Educational, 1997-2020 Janney, Peter, The Murder of John Kennedy's Mistress, Part 1, WhoWhatWhy, 2017 Janney, Peter, The Murder of John Kennedy's Mistress, Part 2, WhoWhatWhy, 2017 Hornberger, Jacob G, When Ben Bradlee…, The Future of Freedom Foundation, 2021 Janney, Peter, The Lone Voice of Justice in the murder of…, Mary's Mosaic, 2016 O'Shea, Devin Thomas, Bad Shot, Mary, Apocalypse Confidential, 2023 Morrow, Lance, 44 Years Later, a Washington, D.C. Death…, Smithsonian, 2008 Kim, Leena, Inside the Unsolved Murder of JFK's Mistress…, Town and Country, 2020 Markoski, Katherine, Artist Mary Pinchot Meyer, Smithsonian Art Museum, 2024  Warwick, Mal, John F. Kennedy's lover kept a diary, and it…, Mal Warwick On Books Vincent, Zachary, Mary Pinchot Meyer, 1920-1964, HASTA, 2023 Zielinski, Graeme, Key CIA Figure Cord Meyer Dies, Washington Post, 2001 Nobile, Phillip, Rosenbaum, Ron, The Curious Aftermath of JFK's…, New Times, 1974 Burleigh, Nina A Very Private Woman(2009-10-21).  Ward, Bernie and Toogood, Granville. "Former Vice President of Washington Post Reveals JFK - 2 Year White House Romance." National Enquirer. March 2, 1976. Kennedy Assassination Meyer and JFK Half Light | Smithsonian American Art Museum Mary Eno Pinchot Meyer (1920-1964) - Find a Grave Memorial McNeil, Liz, McAfee, Tierney, JFK's Mistress Who Was Murdered: Some Say Mary Pinchot Meyer Was Killed by CIA, People, 2017 Kenneth O'Donnell, Spartacus Educational, 1997-2020 Dovey Roundtree, Spartacus Educational, 1997-2020 Burleigh, Nina, The Mysterious Murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer…, The Daily Beast, 2012 Hornberger, Jacob G, A Remarkable Lawyer.., The Future of Freedom Foundation, 2018 JFK love letter to his alleged mistress sells for big money, Boston Globe, 2016 Newton, Michael (2009). "Mary Pinchot Meyer". The Encyclopedia of Unsolved Crimes (2nd ed.). New York: Infobase Publishing. pp. 240–241. ISBN 9781438119144 Bell, Anthony, The quietly defiant, unlikely fighter: Pfc. Sarah Keys and the fight for justice and humanity, The United States Army, 2014 Grant, Steve, Gifford Pinchot: Bridging Two Eras of National Conservation, Connecticut History Weinman, Sarah, Women on the Edge of a Conspiracy Theory, Hazlitt, 2013 Cohen, Alina, The Forgotten Female Artist Who May Have Been Murdered by the CIA, Artsy, 2019 BLOND GHOST: Corn, David: 9780671695255: Amazon.com: Books Flashbacks: Leary, Timothy: 9780874778700: Amazon.com: Books

Our Special Guest this week is Níall McLaughlin RA. Níall is Professor of Architectural Practice at the Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London. Latest News Update on planning related matters. A High Court Judgement where Amalgamated Smart Metering Ltd filed a claim form seeking permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council dated 22 February 2024 to grant outline planning permission for residential development comprising up to 120 units including details of means of access at a former bus depot at Midland Road, Masbrough, Rotherham. The application for planning permission had been made by Prospect Estates Ltd. An Appeal Decision regarding planning permission for a temporary 49.35MW battery energy storage facility, with security fencing, access and associated works on land off Chapel Lane, Great Barr, Walsall in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/1286 dated 4 October 2023. One of the first decisions to consider the issue of ‘grey belt' land in favour of the Appellant. An Appeal Decision regarding a development proposed for a sand and gravel quarry with progressive restoration using site derived and imported inert material to agricultural parkland, public access and nature enhancement. This decision supersedes that issued on 5 May 2023. That decision on the appeal was quashed by order of the High Court. Visit our website: hwgpnfy.com

Episode 351: On March 8, 1987, a routine Sunday morning traffic stop on a quiet stretch of Route 640 between Yoho Lake and Hanwell to the southwest of Fredericton, New Brunswick, turned into a tragedy that shocked the nation. Constable Emmanuel “Manni” Aucoin, a 31-year-old highway patrol officer, husband and father of two young children, was shot and killed in the line of duty. His murderer, Anthony Phillip Romeo, an American fugitive who was wanted for another killing in New York, had been fleeing authorities when Aucoin pulled him over for speeding. Romeo shot Aucoin twice in the head as he wrote up a ticket, leaving him to die in his cruiser before fleeing back to the United States. Romeo was later captured, claiming Aucoin was a monster who'd been killing young men. Constable Aucoin was the third Canadian police officer killed on duty in 1987 and was the first and only member of the New Brunswick Highway Patrol ever to die while serving. Sources: Joseph Emmanuel “Manni” Aucoin (1955-1987) - Find... Anthony Philip Romeo, Petitioner, Appellant, v. James B. Roache, Respondent, Appellee, 820 F.2d 540 (1st Cir. 1987) Cst. Emmanuel Joseph Aucoin 1991 CanLII 12407 (NB KB) | R. v. Romeo (1991) | CanLII 1991 CanLII 113 (SCC) | R. v. Romeo | CanLII R. v. Romeo - SCC Cases HE'S CHARGED IN '85 GUN SLAY Anthony Phillip Romeo - Search - Newspapers.com™ Governor General Award — Emmanuel Joseph Aucoin Police Exemplary Service Medal, Awarded on August 28, 1987 New Brunswick Highway Patrol SUSPECT IN KILLING ON FIRE I. IS HELD IN CANADIAN SLAYING (Published 1987) N.B. cop killer Anthony Romeo granted escorted trip for meditation class Facebook — MURDER - CST. MANNY AUCOIN N.B. cop killer Anthony Romeo granted escorted trip for meditation class - New Brunswick Facing killer a life-changing event | Blue Line Man, 25, Found Slain In Home on Fire Island (Published 1985) SUSPECT IS NAMED IN MURDER OF SON OF EX-AIDE TO CUOMO (Published 1987) New Yorker ordered held in Canadian cop killing - UPI Archives PEOPLE v. ROMEO (2008) 1985 L.I. conviction is overturned Parole board denies release of American who killed New Brunswick cop in 1987 - New Brunswick New Brunswick highway patrol officer's killer denied full parole | CBC News Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this chilling episode of Almost Fiction, we explore the violent crime spree of Mitchell Sims and Ruby Padgett, a couple whose anger and desperation led to a series of horrifying murders. From the Domino's Pizza murders in South Carolina to the shocking double homicide in California, their story reveals how personal grievances and greed spiraled into a nationwide killing spree.Join us as we dissect the motives behind their actions, the details of their crimes, and the legacy of fear they left behind. Was this a case of workplace rage taken too far, or something even darker?Sources:No. S004783. Jun 28, 1993. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MITCHELL CARLTON SIMS, Defendant and Appellant. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. A 591707, Jack B. Tso, Judge.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 425 F.3d 560. Mitchell Carlton Sims, Petitioner-appellant, v. Jill Brown, Warden,* Respondent-appellee. 2 Sought in Deaths of Pizza Workers Arrested in Vegas. By David Freed - Los Angeles Times. December 26, 1985.‘Lessons learned as the son of a serial killer'. By The Baptist Courier. Published on October 1, 2008. Snapped: Killer Couples. Season 7 Episode 3: Ruby Padgette and Mitchell Sims. Aired June 23, 2012.Access ad-free episodes, bonus content, and get all of the 11:59 Media Podcast library!Access hours of extra content each week, exclusive merch, and early access to new podcasts.Visit https://1159plus.com or https://www.patreon.com/1159media 

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 7:06)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 7:06)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 7:06)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf

Following the recent allegations of abuse surrounding former owner of Harrods, Mohamed Al-Fayed, vicarious liability has been in the news once again. Emma-Louise Fenelon speaks to Isabel McArdle about developments in this area of law since her previous episode with Rob Kellar KC in 2020 and in particular since the Supreme Court decision in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v BXB [2023] UKSC 15 The episode discusses the following cases: WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents) [2020] UKSC Barclays Bank v. Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc  [2016] UKSC 11 Cox v. Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 The Christian Brothers Case [2012] UKSC 56 Armes v Nottinghamshire CC [2017] UKSC Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v BXB [2023] UKSC 15 Law Pod UK is published by 1 Crown Office Row. Supporting articles are published on the UK Human Rights Blog. Follow and interact with the podcast team on Twitter.

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 7:06)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 7:06)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.(commercial at 8:18)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A New England family in a small town was tormented by someone hiding, lurking and living in their walls for months in 1986. A year later they learned what this monster was capable of. Source info.. . . . . . .2018.12.3 Appellant's Brief.pdf (jlc.org) Triple Murderer Daniel LaPlante Must Wait 15 More Years Before Chance At Parole - CBS Boston (cbsnews.com) This Teen Terrorized A Family By Living In Their Walls, And The True Story Is So Scary It Sounds Like An Urban Legend (ranker.com) The Elm Street Nightmare (celticssentinel.com) Gustafson Murders - Newspapers.com™ Convicted triple-murderer Daniel LaPlante apologizes in bid for reduced sentence – Lowell Sun Man Who Found Slain Family Learns to Rebuild His Life From Tragedy - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com) Daniel LaPlante's Murder of the Gustafson Family Revisited | Crime News (oxygen.com) Man Convicted Of Killing Pregnant Mom, 2 Young Kids Appeals Sentence (youtube.com) Daniel LaPlante, The Teen Killer Who Lived Inside A Family's Walls (allthatsinteresting.com) LaPLANTE, COMMONWEALTH vs., 482 Mass. 399 (masscases.com) COMMONWEALTH vs. DANIEL J. LAPLANTE :: :: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Decisions :: Massachusetts Case Law :: Massachusetts Law :: US Law :: Justia Gustafson Murders - Newspapers.com™ Daniel LaPlante: A Murderer Who Lived in the Walls of His Love Interest | The Mystery Box (medium.com) Phrogging: Hider in my house, footsteps in the attic Investigation Discovery The Real Murders On Elm Street Killer In The Walls

On August 5, 1996, 43-year-old Jennifer Myers was working alone at the Tailfeather Art Gallery in West Manchester Township, PA. Just before 11 AM, a man walked in, pulled a gun, and demanded money. The robber was interrupted by an unexpected delivery and fled, but he was quickly identified as a man named Kevin Dowling and arrested. But as the trial approached, Jennifer was found brutally murdered in the very gallery she worked. Police were convinced Kevin was the killer, but he had an alibi so airtight it seemed impossible—timestamped footage showed him fishing miles away on the day of the murder. So, who really killed Jennifer Myers? Or did Kevin Dowling somehow pull off the perfect crime? Sponsors: Quince Go to quince.com/creepers for free shipping and 365-day returns! Hello Fresh Get 10 FREE meals at Hellofresh.com/creepers!! Applied across 7 boxes, new subscribers only, varies by plan. My Alloy Go to Myalloy.com to start your consult with a menopause trained expert today! Use Promo Code CREEPERS to get $20 off your first order!! Sources: York County killer Kevin Dowling heads back to death row after high court denies new trial Court finds state trooper fabricated evidence - awards death row prisoner Kevin Dowling new trial Kevin Dowling, sentenced to death in infamous 1997 Spring Grove murder, awarded new trial Kevin Brian Dowling Armed Robbery Police Report [J-70-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant v. KEVIN BRIAN DOWLING. COMMONWEALTH v. DOWLING (2005) | FindLaw Kevin Brian Dowling - Forensic Files Falsehoods Kevin Brian Dowling - Summary of Cases Kevin Brian Dowling Case Files Robbery Case Court Memorandum Sentenced to die a quarter-century ago, Dowling could get new trial in Spring Grove business woman's murder A look at York County's death row inmates Fish, lies and videotape: Read YDR's complete 1998 coverage of Kevin Dowling's murder trial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Our Special Guest this week is Mike Kiely, Chair of the Board at the Planning Officers Society. Latest News Update on planning related matters. Decision of the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Building Safety & Homelessness dated 25th September 2024 allowing an appeal by a consortium led by Barratt David Wilson Homes, granting outline planning permission, in accordance with the inspector's recommendations, for up to 1000 dwellings, secondary & primary schools, community facility & retail uses, open space & landscaped areas with associated engineering works on land between Huntingdon Toad & Hilston Road Cambridge, known Darwin Green Phases Two and Three. Decision of an inspector dated 24th September 2024 allowing an appeal by Infinis Solar Developments Ltd against the decision of Central Bedfordshire Council to refuse an application for the installation of a solar PV park land at Brogborough Landfill Site, Woburn Road, Lidlington. Decision of an inspector dated 18th September 2024 dismissing an appeal by Gladman Developments Ltd against the refusal by Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough Council to grant outline planning permission for 500 homes on highways grounds & awarding partial costs to the Appellant & refusing the Council's application for a full award of costs. Visit our Website: hwgpnfy.com #HWGPNFY

The Appellant, Daniel Hodgson, was charged with second-degree murder following a death at a house party. The victim, a large man, had become aggressive towards the house owner and refused to leave. Mr. Hodgson, who was asleep in a nearby bedroom, was asked by a guest to help remove the victim from the house. The victim died after Mr. Hodgson applied a one-arm choke hold on him.Mr. Hodgson was acquitted at trial in the Nunavut Court of Justice. The trial judge had reasonable doubt as to whether Mr. Hodgson had the requisite intent for murder. On the lesser included offence of manslaughter, the Court held that the Crown had not disproven beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Hodgson acted in self-defence, pursuant to s. 34 of the Criminal Code. The Crown appealed to the Nunavut Court of Appeal, who set aside the acquittal and ordered a new trial. The Court of Appeal agreed with the Crown's submission that the trial judge improperly took a solely subjective approach to assessing Mr. Hodgson's response to the perceived threat posed by the victim.Mr. Hodgson sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, which was granted. Mr. Hogson argues, among other grounds of appeal, that the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the trial judge erroneously approached the issue of the reasonableness of his response under s. 34(2)(c) from a purely subjective perspective.

See below for timestamps! In today's episode we kick off the case of David Michael Crawford, a retired Maryland Police Chief turned serial arsonist. We will be starting with the first arson in a series he was linked to in court with a fire at the home of a fellow city employee. We're bringing you a deep dive into a case I've been researching for over 6 months and currently this case is pending appeal in Maryland. Join us as we dive into one twisted and shocking serial arson case on Crime to Burn.  We begin this case with many disclaimers and explanations about evidence, sources, and testimony in this case and they are important. I have provided time stamps below in case you wish to fast forward to the case but the disclaimers will provide you with additional insight into the judicial process and criminal court cases.  Timestamps: Disclaimers begin at 2:49 2:49 - 4:08 - A discussion about crimes the defendant has been convicted of and the difference between accused and convicted.  4:08 - 5:06 - An explanation of some evidence presented in court related to fires other than the ones for which he was standing trial.  5:06 - 6:44 - A discussion of the defendant's wife and explanation that she is not accused of being involved nor of having knowledge of her husband's crimes.  6:44 - 8:25 - Discussion of crimes unrelated to the arsons presented in court which members of the defendant's immediate family indicated in press reports they suspect Crawford's involvement.  8:25 - 10:27 - Explanation of court recordings and bench conversations and differentiating between what can be gleaned from the court recordings verses what was known to the jury. Also includes a discussion of hearsay, probative value of evidence and testimony, and prejudicial testimony.  10:27 - 11:45 - Discussion of state's burden in criminal cases and constitutional rights of defendants to not testify. 11:45 - 13:17: Discussion of off the record sources used for this podcast and a reminder that all witnesses are off-limits until the conclusion of the appeal. 13:17 - 15:34 - My own personal implicit bias due to my involvement in some of the organizations involved in this case.  15:34 - 17:05 - Discussion of what court records were obtained and what records were not used and why.  17:05 - 18:12 - Discussion about defense attorney. UPDATE AFTER RECORDING: Mr. Bonsib did reply to my email and provided the appellate brief but has indicated that given the pending appeal, he does not feel it would be appropriate to discuss the case with me. I understand and respect his decision.  18:12 - 20:27 - Discussion about narrative storytelling and using emotions to drive the narrative and a reminder that these perspectives used for storytelling are not intended to imply guilt or innocence of the defendant. Also discussion about authentically presenting the emotions and implications of others and not my own.  20:27 END OF DISCLAIMERS.  Background Music is by Not Notoriously Coordinated.  Please follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram. I am most active on Instagram and do provide reels that often give technical information or case background for our current cases. we are @crimetoburn on all three platforms. You can email us at crimetoburn@gmail.com and we welcome your feedback. We would greatly appreciate a 5 star review on whatever platform you use to listen. You can also find us on youtube.  Sources used: Application for Statement of Charges against David Michael Crawford of Ellicott City, MD to the District Court of Maryland filed 3/2/2021; D-101-CR-21-000235. https://www.scribd.com/document/497270007/Charging-Docs-David-Michael-Crawford Court Recordings from Circuit Court for Howard County - Criminal Case C-13-CR-21-000152. State of Maryland vs. David Michael Crawford. Dates of 2/27/2023 through 3/9/2023.  In the Appellate Court of Maryland, David Michael Crawford (Appellant) v. State of Maryland (Appellee). Appeal from the Circuit Court for Howard County Opening Brief and Appendix of the Appellant.  Personal communications with persons familiar with David Michael Crawford. (off-the-record interviews) Mann, Alex. "Former Laurel police chief craved authroity, set fires for revenge, Howard prosecutors say." Baltimore Sun, Mar 1, 2023.  Mann, Alex. "Ex-Laurel police chief contacted victims after series of arson fires. He's accused of keeping enemies list, starting blazes." Baltimore Sun. (no date provided in copy used) Mann, Alex. "'Arson Destroys Persons': Former Laurel Police Chief sentenced to life for Howard County fires." Baltimore Sun. June 27, 2023 Faguy, Ana et. al. "Retired Maryland police chief used arson for vendettas, prosecutors say; a stirring dog may have saved one family." Baltimore Sun, Mar 4, 2021.  Henderson, Evelyn Palattella. "My neighbor and former Police Chief burned down my house twice." Medium. Mar 9, 2021. Morse, Dan. "Serial arsonist tracked through dog hair, surveilance video and grudges, officials allege." The Washington Post March 4, 2021.  "Testimony from arson victims, including suspects own family, suggest fires set out of revenge." https://www.wbaltv.com/article/david-crawford-arson-trial-fire-victims-testimony/43162693. Accessed Mar 15, 2024. Chappell, Bill. "A former Police Chief in MD. Was A 'Serial Arsonist,' Authorities Say." https://www.npr.org/2021/03/04/973696073/a-former-police-chief-in-md-was-a-serial-arsonist-authorities-say. NPR. Mar 4, 2021. Accessed Mar 15, 2021. Fenton, Justin. "Ex-police chief's daughter details terrorizing act in court filing." The Washington Post. May 9 2021.  Murchison, Joe. "Arsonist's twisted trail." Streetcar Suburbs News. https://streetcarsuburbs.news/arsonists-twisted-trail/ Accessed Mar 15, 2024. Former Laurel police chief gets life sentences in arson case. WBAL-TV 11 Baltimore. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyJM2ndLt4U Former Maryland Police Chief Sentenced to Life In Prison in Arson Cases. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/video/former-maryland-police-chief-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-in-arson-cases-185384517841 "Former Maryland police chief accused fo setting 12 "revenge fires" sentenced to multiple life terms. CBS News. Jun 28, 2023. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/david-crawford-revenge-fires-ex-maryland-police-chief-sentenced-multiple-life-terms/ David Crawford LinkedIn Page, Ellicott City, Maryland, United States. https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-crawford-47537813b Morse, Dan. "Former Maryland police chief gets life prison terms for arson spree." The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/06/27/david-crawford-arson-life-sentences/ Palmer, Emily. "Ex Maryland Police Chief Set 12 'Revenge fires,' Gets Multiple Life Sentences. People Magazine. Updated Jun 28, 2023. https://people.com/ex-maryland-police-chief-revenge-fires-multiple-life-sentences-7554649 Carballo, Rebecca. "Ex-Police Chief in Maryland Gets Multiple Life Terms in Series of Arsons." The New York times. Jun 27, 2023. Gilstrap, Samantha. "Former police Chief handed 8 life sentences for series of arsons across Maryland." WUSA9. Updated Jun 27, 2023. https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/maryland/former-laurel-police-chief-handed-8-life-sentences-for-series-of-arsons-across-maryland/65-f242e76b-c648-4077-91b3-b983a008fcaf Neammanee, Pocharapon. "Former Police Chief Who Set Series of Fires as Revenge Sentenced to Life in Prison." Huffpost. Jun 28, 2023. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/police-chief-arson-revenge-life-sentence_n_649c6017e4b0cd6f7df15fc7 Lambe, Jerry. "Evil and terrifying: Ex-police chief gets 8 life sentences for setting series of fires targeting rivals and people he believed slighted him." Law & Crime. Jun 28, 2023, https://lawandcrime.com/crime/evil-and-terrifying-ex-police-chief-gets-8-life-sentences-for-setting-series-of-fires-targeting-rivals-and-people-he-believed-slighted-him/ Duffy, Ken. "Former Laurel Police Chief David Crawford gets life sentences in arson cases." WBAL News Radio. Jun 27, 2023. https://www.wbal.com/former-laurel-police-chief-david-crawford-gets-life-sentences-in-arson-cases/ Massie, Graeme. "Ex-Maryland police chief senntenced to life for string of revenge arson attacks." The Independent. Los Angeles. Jun 28, 2023. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/maryland-police-chief-arson-sentencing-b2365958.html Skene, Lea. "Ex-police chief convicted in 4 arsons targeting his enemies." AP News. 9 Mar 2023. https://apnews.com/article/maryland-police-chief-convicted-arson-31f2c9e5c38891415c18ffc901361e86 VerHeist, Megan. "Ex-MD Police Chief Accused of Arson Kept 'Target list': Reports. Mar 2, 2023. https://patch.com/maryland/ellicottcity/ex-md-police-chief-accused-arson-kept-target-list-reports Reed, Lillian. "Former Laurel police chief gets two life sentences plus 75 years for setting fires." The Baltimore Banner, Jun 27, 2023. Osborne, Mark. "Former police chief facing dozens of attempted murder charges in alleged arsons." 6ABC Philadelphia. Mar 4, 2021. News Release - Office of the State's Attorney for Howard County. Ellicott City Resident David Crawford Sentenced to Mu;tiple Life Sentences Plus 75 Years in Serial Arson Case. https://howardcountysao.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/David-Crawford-Sentencing-6.27.23.pdf Prince George's County Fire/EMS Department. "Serial Arsonist Arrested in Multi-Jurisdictional Investigation." Mar 3, 2021. https://pgfdpio.blogspot.com/2021/03/serial-arsonist-arrested-in-multi.html Leonard, Kevin. "Crawford's Reign of Terror." Voices of Laurel., https://www.voicesoflaurel.com/post/crawford-s-reign-of-terror Riess, Rebekah et. al. "Former police chief is facing charges over fires authorities say were linked to people he had disagreements with." CNN US. Mar 4, 2021. https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/04/us/maryland-former-chief-attempted-murder-arson-charges/index.html "Daughter of Laurel Police Chief Turned Alleged Arsonist David Crawford Speaks Out." WJZ. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58Kvo7Ac57s Swalec, Andrea. "Ex-Police Chief Suspected in Maryland "Revenge" Arsons Kept List of Targets: Officials." NBC 4 Washington. Mar 4, 2021. https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/ex-police-chief-suspected-in-maryland-revenge-arsons-kept-list-of-targets-officials/2595652/ Bonessi, Dominique Maria. "Former Md. Police Chief Arrested in Connection to a Dozen Arson Attacks." DCist. Mar 3, 2021. https://dcist.com/story/21/03/03/laurel-maryland-police-chief-david-crawford-arson-fires/ Stabley, Matthew, et. al. "Former Police Chief Accused of Maryland Arsons Over Decade." NBC 4 Washington. Mar 3, 2021. https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/former-police-chief-charged-in-series-of-arsons-in-maryland-since-2011/2594009/ TooFab Staff. "Police Finally Catch Serial Arson Suspect After Decade of Fire Attacks - And It's Their Former Chief." TooFab. Mar 5, 2021. https://toofab.com/2021/03/05/police-finally-catch-serial-arson-suspect-after-decade-of-fire-attacks-and-its-their-former-chief/ Baumgart, Jacob. "Stepson's House Fires Tied To Former Laurel Police Chief: Report." Bowie Patch. May 13, 2021. https://patch.com/maryland/bowie/stepsons-house-fires-tied-former-laurel-police-chief-report I have been researching this case for over 6 months and have made a good faith effort to include all relevant sources. I will update this list as required during the course of this series. If I discover I have omitted a source from this list, I will correct it as soon as I recognize the omission. It's completely possible that I've stashed some papers in some bag or corner I missed while compiling my sources for this reference list. Please reach out to me at crimetoburn@gmail.com if you have concerns.    

On September 6th, 1952, Betty Butler viciously murdered Evelyn Clark, while fishing at Sharon Woods. An argument occurred, and once they were back to shore, multiple witnesses saw Betty attack and drown Evelyn. No one denies Betty is guilty, not even Betty herself, but what happened to cause such a violent crime? Join us as we peel back the layers of this case and try to understand why Betty did it. Tea of the Day: Shaka Sunrise TeaTheme Music by Brad FrankFor a full list of sources, go to https://tea-time-crimes.simplecast.com/episodes.Sources:Deadly Women: Season 10, Episode 13, “Friends to Foes.” Episode aired Nov 26, 2016, Director: Ryan Osmond, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6276114/Spooked by Ken Summers, “Dead Women Tell No Tales…Or Do They?” Wednesday, August 3, 2011, https://moonspenders.blogspot.com/2011/08/dead-women-tell-no-tales-or-do-they.html“'A War of Currents': The Real Story of Thomas Edison and the Invention of the Electric Chair.” By Kevin Martin, May 08, 2019, Magellan, https://www.magellantv.com/articles/a-war-of-currents-the-real-story-of-thomas-edison-and-the-invention-of-the-electric-chairReport: Ohio's Capital-Punishment System Remains Unworkable, Ohio Attorney General, April 1st, 2024, https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Media/News-Releases/April-2024/Report-Ohio%E2%80%99s-Capital-Punishment-System-Remains-UnDepartment of Rehabilitation & Correction, “Capital Punishment: Overview.” https://drc.ohio.gov/about/capital-punishment/capital-punishmentDeath Penalty Information Center, “History of the Death Penalty.” https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/state-and-federal-info/state-by-state/ohioSTATE v. THOMPSON (2002): Supreme Court of Ohio, The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. THOMPSON, Appellant, No. 2001-0333, Decided: May 15, 2002, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/oh-supreme-court/1152986.html“West End Woman Strangled, Drowned in Sharon Woods.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Sun, Sep 07, 1952, Page 1, https://www.newspapers.com/image/102828410/“Rival Choked and Drowned; Woman Held for Grand Jury.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Mon, Sep 08, 1952, Page 14, https://www.newspapers.com/image/102828825/“Indicted for Murder.” (AP) News Journal, Sat, Oct 04, 1952, Page 1, https://www.newspapers.com/image/294545519/“Jury Seated Tentatively In Lake Murder Trial.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Wed, Mar 04, 1953, Page 8, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100606455/“Bus Balks Jury's Trip.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Thu, Mar 05, 1953, Page 26, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100606557/“State Complete Testimony In Willful Drowning.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Sat, Mar 07, 1953, Page 14, https://www.newspapers.com/image/103287432/“Blame Killing on Victim.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Tue, Mar 10, 1953, Page 5, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100607200/“Murder Case Near End.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Wed, Mar 11, 1953, Page 8, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100607276/“Woman Gets Death In Park Slaying.” The Cincinnati Post, Thu, Mar 12, 1953, Page 29, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762608222/“Betty Butler Third Woman to Face Execution From Hamilton County Since ‘37.”  The Cincinnati Enquirer, Fri, Mar 13, 1953, Page 16, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100607434/“Strangle-Drowning Killer Asks New Trial.” The Cincinnati Post, Mon, Mar 16, 1953, Page 4, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762608491/“Plea For Mercy Is Made In Death Sentence.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Tue, Mar 31, 1953, Page 8, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100612836/“New Trial Denied.” (AP) The Marion Star, Mon, Apr 06, 1953, Page 1, https://www.newspapers.com/image/296626177/“Refuse to Show Mercy To Woman Condemned to Die.” (INS) The Daily Times, Wed, Apr 08, 1953, Page 4, https://www.newspapers.com/image/83973405/“Death Sentence for ‘Sex Slave' Slaying.” The Plain Speaker, Sat, Apr 18, 1953, Page 15, https://www.newspapers.com/image/503493891/“Woman Facing ‘Chair' Taken to Reformatory.” The Tribune, Thu, Apr 23, 1953 ·Page 1, https://www.newspapers.com/image/321713424/“Drowning Slayer Gets Death Stay.” The Cincinnati Post, Tue, Aug 04, 1953, Page 4, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762515136/“Death Sentence is Upheld in Park Slaying.” The Cincinnati Post, Mon, Oct 19, 1953, Page 18, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762810610/“St. Dismas, St. Paul, and Christ… Betty Butler sketches in death-row cell.” By James T. Keenan. The Cincinnati Post, Fri, Nov 27, 1953 ·Page 15, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762835455/“Betty Butler Doomed To Die Same Day As Dovie Dean.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Tue, Dec 01, 1953, Page 10, https://www.newspapers.com/image/100630664/“To Hear Appeal.” (U.P.) The Daily Advocate, Sat, Feb 20, 1954, Page 8, https://www.newspapers.com/image/651646674/“Betty Butler Files Appeal From Date With Death.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, Sat, Mar 13, 1954, Page 29, https://www.newspapers.com/image/102838386/“Court To Hear Murder  Appeal.” The Zanesville Signal, Wed, Mar 17, 1954, Page 9, https://www.newspapers.com/image/1045690534/“Betty Butler Gets Reprieve.” The Akron Beacon Journal, Mon, Apr 05, 1954, Page 3, https://www.newspapers.com/image/150110769/“Pardon Board Hears Plea of Woman Slayer.” The Newark Advocate, Fri, Apr 09, 1954, Page 15, https://www.newspapers.com/image/287290882/“Letters Poured In!” New Pittsburgh Courier, Sat, Apr 17, 1954, Page 5, https://www.newspapers.com/image/40032549/“Betty Butler Paints, Studies Religion as Death Nears.” By James T. Keenan, The Cincinnati Post, Fri, May 07, 1954, Page 17, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762604071/“Betty Butler Wants Simple Food And Solitude as Death Nears.”By Scripps-Howard Newspapers. The Cincinnati Post, Fri, Jun 11, 1954, Page 1, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762784627/“Betty Butler Dies in Chair For Murder.” By Post State Wire, The Cincinnati Post, Sat, Jun 12, 1954, Page 14, https://www.newspapers.com/image/762785655/ 

There is not much to say about Christa Gail Pike, except for the fac that she single handedly proves that evil lives among us. SOURCES:https://murderpedia.org/female.P/p/pike-christa.htmSTATE v. PIKE (1998) Supreme Court of Tennessee,at Knoxville. STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Christa Gail PIKE, Appellant. Decided: October 05, 1998.https://www.mercyforchrista.org/christa-s-storyJudge dismisses death row inmate Christa Pike's bid to reopen her criminal case. By John North For WBIR10 News. October 31, 2023. Woman convicted in 1995 Knoxville murder asks death sentence be vacated. By Gregory Raucoules for WATE Knox County News. August 30, 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christa_PikeStaff management; How to tell the difference between an excuse and a reason. By Steve Parker for Linkedin.com. September 24, 2024. Access ad-free episodes, bonus content, and get all of the 11:59 Media Podcast library!Access hours of extra content each week, exclusive merch, and early access to new podcasts.Visit https://1159plus.com or https://www.patreon.com/1159media

Thomas William Rigterink was a former model turned killer who seemingly out of nowhere, committed a brutal attack, one that spilled over to innocents just trying to live their lives. It's a sobering testament to just how quickly our lives can change, especially when we least expect it. Check out my cameo at: https://v.cameo.com/e/dpkehyHCAKb Sources: Supreme Court of Florida. No. SC05-2162. THOMAS WILLIAM RIGTERINK, Appellant,Vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. January 30, 2009. Ex-Model Rigterink Is Sentenced to Death. Adopted Son of PCC Professors Becomes Polk's 14th Death Row Inmate. Jason Geary - The Ledger. October 15, 2005https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2010/03/01/court-orders-new-look-at-fla-murder-case/Murder Defendant Takes the Stand: Thomas Rigterink tells jurors he played no part in double slaying, by Jason Geary - The Ledger Friday, September 2, 2005.Stabbing Suspect Arrested: Authorities say Thomas William Rigterink admitted to being involved in two slayings, by Amy L. Edwards - The Ledger. Friday, October 17, 2003.

The Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen, argued before Judges Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Danielle J. Forrest, and Jennifer Sung in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on June 4, 2024. Argued by Michael Russell (on behalf of Knudsen, et al.) and Constance Van Klay (on behalf of the Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana, et al.). Description of the Case, from the Introduction to the Appellees' Answering Brief: It is clear what the Montana legislature meant to target through House Bill 359 (“HB 359”): drag. Legislators set their sights on drag because they believed—wrongly, and without evidence—that gender-nonconforming expression harms children. Obvious on the face of the law, their intent to stifle disfavored speech is proof enough that Plaintiffs likely will succeed on the merits of their First Amendment claim. Far less clear—indeed, impossible to determine—is the law's effect. Through HB 359, the legislature wildly overshot its mark, threatening draconian penalties against individuals, businesses, and organizations engaged in speech far beyond drag performances. As confusing as it is discriminatory, HB 359 is void for vagueness. HB 359 can withstand constitutional review only by both creating a new exception to the First Amendment for drag and ignoring the void for vagueness doctrine. It discriminates on the basis of content and viewpoint, broadly chills protected speech, and opens the door to discriminatory enforcement. Statement of the Issues, from the Appellant's Opening Brief: 1. Whether the district court erred in finding that Plaintiffs have standing to seek injunctive relief against the State Defendants. 2. Whether the district court erred in finding Plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits of their First/Fourteenth Amendment facial claim; 3. Whether the district court erred in finding Plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits of their Fifth/Fourteenth Amendment facial claim; 4. Whether the district court erred in finding the remaining Winter factors weigh in favor of issuing a preliminary injunction; and 5. In the alternative, whether the district court erred in failing to properly narrow the scope of its preliminary injunction. Resources: Equality Files case docket for The Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you're enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute's mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

Nicholas Somberg v. Karen McDonald, argued before Senior Judge Alice M. Batchelder, Judge Amul R. Thapar, and Judge Andre B. Mathis in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on June 12, 2024. Argued by Philip L. Ellison (on behalf of Nicholas Somberg) and Brooke E. Tucker (on behalf of Karen McDonald). Statement of Question Presented, from the Appellant's Brief: Plaintiff Nicholas Somberg contends he (and others) have the First Amendment right to photograph, screenshot, audio/video record, broadcast, report, distribute, share, and make public photographic, audio, and audio-video recordings of public court proceedings being livestreamed worldwide when doing such does not interact or cause any interaction with pending proceedings. The question presented is: Whether the First Amendment protects the making of digital records (i.e. photographic and audio-video recordings) of public court proceedings from online streaming services being broadcasted worldwide when doing so does not in any way interfere with pending judicial proceedings? Resources: CourtListener case docket for Somberg v. McDonald The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you're enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute's mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

U.S. v. Sittenfeld, argued before Judges John K. Bush, John B. Nalbandian, Eric E. Murphy in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on May 9, 2024 Statement of the Issues, from the Appellant's Opening Brief: 1. Whether objectively ambiguous evidence can prove an “explicit” quid pro quo, and whether the concededly ambiguous evidence here sufficed to do so. 2. Whether the Government constructively amended the indictment by relying on a “bribe” different from the one specified in the indictment's “to wit” clause. Introduction to the case, from the Appellant's Opening Brief: Politicians cannot sell their official powers—not for bags of cash, not for Rolexes or luxury travel, and not even for campaign contributions. But identifying a campaign contribution as a bribe is uniquely fraught, because such contributions are always based on expectations of what the candidate will do in office. Candidates, likewise, know their policies, promises, and pledges will affect their ability to raise funds. All that is not only lawful; it is constitutionally protected. The result is an incredibly fine line: Donating or soliciting based on policy commitments is First Amendment activity, while donating or soliciting in exchange for policy commitments threatens a prison sentence. Articulating that distinction is hard enough; distinguishing the two in practice is even harder. That, in turn, casts a pall of prosecution over our entire political system and deprives officials and citizens alike of fair notice about what conduct is criminal.   Enter the Supreme Court. In McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257 (1991), the Court addressed that problem by holding that the Government must hurdle a distinctly high evidentiary bar when it premises a bribery charge on a campaign donation …. [I]n the context of campaign contributions, the Government must show the quid pro quo was “explicit”— an unambiguous corrupt bargain. Anything less, the Court warned, would leave every campaign donation the fodder of a bribery charge, and every official at the mercy of a lay jury asked to infer corruption from money in politics….   Alexander “P.G.” Sittenfeld was a rising star on Cincinnati's City Council, and favorite to become the next mayor…. The Government engineered a sting to see if he would accept a campaign donation in exchange for supporting a local development project…. Yet despite that choreography, Sittenfeld never bit….   The jury acquitted Sittenfeld on most counts, but (inconsistently) convicted on two. Even the district court acknowledged the Government's evidence was at most “ambiguous,” and could be easily seen as ordinary politics. But the court reasoned that the jury was free to string together some vague phrases and pull an “explicit” exchange out of a hat. Every other court to address this issue, however, has required clear and unambiguous proof of corruption; none has upheld a conviction on a record so thin and ambivalent. Indeed, if this evidence suffices, McCormick has no meaning; prosecutors would be free to conjure a bribery charge against every politician, ushering in a First Amendment Ice Age.   The Government's failure to satisfy McCormick is the most fundamental legal error. But at minimum this Court should order a new trial, because the Government constructively amended the indictment…. Under this Court's precedent, that shift compels a new trial.  Resources: CourtListener case page for U.S. v. Sittenfeld Institute for Free Speech amicus brief in support of defendant-appellant. The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you're enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute's mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

Diei v. Boyd, argued before Judges Joan L. Larsen, Chad A. Readler, and Stephanie Dawkins Davis in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on May 2, 2024 Statement of the Issues, from the Appellant's Opening Brief: 1. The First Amendment bars public university officials from punishing students for their protected speech under the guise of professionalism policies. Defendants investigated and voted to expel Plaintiff Kimberly Diei under the College of Pharmacy's professionalism policy because of her pseudonymous posts about social and cultural issues on her personal social media accounts. Did the district court err by concluding that Defendants did not violate the First Amendment? 2. Viewpoint discrimination is a long-settled and egregious First Amendment violation. Defendants admit they punished Diei because they disapproved of the “sexual” and “vulgar” views she expressed on her personal social media. Did the district court err by granting Defendants qualified immunity for retaliating against Diei's protected speech? 3. Claims for retrospective declaratory relief continue to present a live controversy so long as they are tied to a claim for damages. Diei's claims for retrospective declaratory relief are tied to her damages claims because they arise out of Defendants' same course of unconstitutional conduct. Did the district court err by concluding that Diei's claims for declaratory relief are moot? Resources: CourtListener case page for Diei v. Boyd The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. Learn more on our website: www.ifs.org

Hi, Curious Listener! Today, I have for you a sordid case of the Dark Web and murder-for-hire. Sources-- State v. Allwine :: 2021 :: Minnesota Supreme Court Decisions :: Minnesota Case Law :: Minnesota Law :: US Law :: Justia  Stephen Allwine sentenced to life in prison for wife's murder (fox9.com)  State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Stephen Carl Allwine, Appellant. A18-0846, A20-1588, Supreme Court, August 18, 2021. (mn.gov)  ALLWINE v. STATE (2023) | FindLaw  Church preacher 'murdered his wife and faked her suicide' to cover up Ashley Madison affairs - Mirror Online  A church elder's Ashley Madison affairs led him to the dark Web — and murder, police say - The Washington Post  Stephen Allwine sentenced to life in prison for wife's murder (fox9.com)  Charges: Cottage Grove man failed to hire hitman, killed wife himself (fox9.com)  Convicted ‘Dark Net' killer claims innocence: ‘I couldn't have done it' (fox9.com)  Scopolamine Uses, Side Effects & Warnings (drugs.com) 

John Sapp always had an excuse for what he did, and those excuses were never good. SOURCES:https://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/people-v-sapp-33309THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, S023628v. JOHN SAPP, Contra Costa County, Defendant and Appellant.Super. Ct. No. 33597-6https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/capital-punishment/condemned-inmate-list-secure-request/Access ad-free episodes, bonus content, and get all of the 11:59 Media Podcast library!Access hours of extra content each week, exclusive merch, and early access to new podcasts.Visit https://1159plus.com or https://www.patreon.com/1159media

Hoge Raad 13 januari 2023 (de schuldenaar / de bewindvoerder) ECLI:NL:HR:2023:29Deze uitspraak van de Hoge Raad gaat over de omvang van het hoger beroep en het beginsel dat een appellant niet slechter mag worden van zijn hoger beroep. In dit Cassatievlog bespreekt Maartje Möhring in drie minuten de uitspraak van de Hoge Raad. Ga naar https://cassatieblog.nl en schrijf je in voor onze wekelijkse nieuwsbrief. Zo ben je altijd op de hoogte van de laatste ontwikkelingen op het gebied van de civiele cassatierechtspraak in Nederland. Uitspraak Hoge Raad (ECLI:NL:HR:2023:29)https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2023:29 

Appellant Daniel Hodgson was charged with second-degree murder following a death at a house party. The victim, a large man, had become aggressive towards the house owner and refused to leave. Mr. Hodgson, who had been sleeping in a nearby bedroom, was asked by a guest to help remove the victim from the house. The victim died after Mr. Hodgson applied a one-arm choke hold on him. Mr. Hodgson was acquitted at trial. The trial judge had a reasonable doubt as to whether Mr. Hodgson had the requisite intent for murder. On the lesser included offence of manslaughter, the trial judge concluded that the Crown had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Hodgson did not act in self-defence pursuant to s. 34 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. The Court of Appeal set aside the acquittal and ordered a new trial. Argued Date 2024-02-15 Keywords Criminal Law — Defences — Self-Defence — Appellant charged with second-degree murder following an altercation at party — Trial judge finding no intent to murder, and Crown failing to disprove self-defence on the lesser included offence of manslaughter — Appellant acquitted — Court of Appeal setting aside acquittal and ordering new trial — Whether Court of Appeal exceeded its jurisdiction in concluding that the trial judge's failure to infer intent for murder was a reviewable legal error — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the trial judge was required to infer the intent for murder — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the trial judge erroneously approached the issue of the reasonableness of the Appellant's response from a purely subjective perspective — Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 34. Notes (Nunavut) (Criminal) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

22-year-old Rowena Irani had her whole life ahead of her. She was working towards a degree in psychology and spent her time working with children who had been abused and neglected, showing them that they were worthy of respect and love. When she connects with an old family friend, Dane Owens, she thinks that her life is about to get even better with a man who loves her, but things start going downhill very quickly and Dane would show Rowena exactly what. kind of man he was. Helpful links/numbers:Sex abuse hotline:1-800-656-4673DV hotline : 1-800-799-7233www.snpfoundation.orgNJ DV Hotline: 1-800-572(7233)https://nj.gov/njsp/division/operations/domestic-violence-info.shtmlConnect with us on Social Media!You can find us at:Patreon: The Book of the Dead PodcastInstagram: @bookofthedeadpodX: @bkofthedeadpodFacebook: The Book of the Dead PodcastTikTok: BookofthedeadpodOr visit our website at www.botdpod.com Don't forget to Rate, Review, & Share with someone who would like the PodcastFor a full list of resources, please send us an email :)About the Author. (n.d.). Toranj Irani. https://www.toranjirani.comDesk, C. (2023, November 25). The tragic murder of Rowena Irani: A young life cut short. Medium. https://medium.com/@crimedesk/the-tragic-murder-of-rowena-irani-a-young-life-cut-short-e7fc70fc259bFamily raising money for Rowena Irani Psychology Scholarship. (2019, June 4). KAKE. https://www.kake.com/story/40593072/family-raising-money-for-rowena-irani-psychology-scholarshipFarhat, J. (n.d.). First-degree murder conviction given in shooting of WSU student Rowena Irani. The Sunflower. https://thesunflower.com/31563/showcase/first-degree-murder-conviction-handed-down-in-shooting-of-wsu-student-rowena-irani/Investigation Discovery. (2022, November 14). Interrogation With A Man Who Killed His Girlfriend [Video]. Facebook. Retrieved December 27, 2023, from https://fb.watch/pcEdwbCJy8/KAKE. (2016, October 28). Chilling details released in murder of Wichita woman. KSNT. https://www.ksnt.com/news/chilling-details-released-in-murder-of-wichita-woman/Korte, A. (n.d.). The legacy of Rowena Irani – daughter, sister, student and children's advocate. The Sunflower. https://thesunflower.com/41777/news/the-legacy-of-rowena-irani-daughter-sister-student-and-childrens-advocate/Leiker, A. (2016, October 7). Man charged in ex-girlfriend's death. The Wichita Eagle, A2.Leiker, A. (2018, December 21). Ex-boyfriend of WSU student gets prison term for killing her. The Wichita Eagle, A2.Potter, T. (2016, October 9). An outpouring after death of Wichita State student. The Wichita Eagle, 3A, 8A.Sumter, A. N. (2022, December 14). Murder of Rowena Irani by Dane Owens featured on American Monster. Daily Crime. https://www.dailycrime.com/murder-of-rowena-irani-by-dane-owens-featured-on-american-monster/Supreme Court of Kansas. (2021). State of Kansas, Appellee, v. Dane Owens, Appellant. In Case Text (496 P.3d 902). https://casetext.com/case/state-v-owens-102850The Wichita Eagle 09 Oct 2016, page A8. (n.d.). Newspapers.com. https://www.newspapers.com/image/666599247/?terms=Rowena%20Irani&match=1Wichita Police Department. (2016). Affidavit (No. 3087GJ634427). Sedgewick County District Court. Retrieved December 26, 2023, from http://kake.images.worldnow.com/library/8d564217-62a8-4be0-af9a-1a6980f08ddf.pdf

Appellant Ummugulsum Yatar was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Ms. Yatar applied to her insurer, TD Insurance Meloche Monnex (hereafter, “TD”) for housekeeping and home maintenance benefits, as well as income replacement benefits (IRB). TD initially paid those benefits. About a year later, following insurance medical examinations, TD denied Ms. Yatar's claim for housekeeping and home maintenance benefits. Several months after that, TD denied her IRB claim. Ms. Yatar brought an application before the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) to challenge the denial of her insurance benefits claim. The application was dismissed. She requested a reconsideration of the LAT decision, which was also dismissed. Ms. Yatar then brought an appeal on questions of law and an application for judicial review of the LAT reconsideration decision before the Divisional Court. The court dismissed both the appeal and the application. The Court of Appeal dismissed Ms. Yatar's appeal from the Divisional Court's decision. Argued Date 2023-11-15 Keywords Administrative law - Boards and tribunals, Appeals, Judicial review - Administrative law — Boards and tribunals — Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) — Appeals — Judicial review — Appellant injured in motor vehicle accident, insurer denying claim for benefits — LAT dismissing appellant's benefits claim — Appellant simultaneously appealing on questions of law and seeking judicial review on questions of fact and mixed fact and law — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the legislature's decision to limit the right of appeal to pure questions of law restricted the availability of judicial review concerning other questions to rare or unusual cases — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding the adjudicator's decision was reasonable — Licence Appeal Tribunal Act, 1999, S.O. 1999, c. 12, Sch. G — Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I.8 — Judicial Review Procedure Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. J.1. Notes (Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave) Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

I usually try to keep my opinions out of the podcast. Sometimes though my thoughts and feelings do bleed through, but for the most part, I try to only stick to the story. But, the more cases I cover, the more I research incidents and punishments, the more I find that the system seems to be broken.This week we cover the case of Cecil Stephen Sutherland. SOURCES:https://www.themidwestcrimefiles.com/post/murder-in-kell-the-amy-schulz-storyDocumentary: From Dusk to Darkness with Paula Zahnhttps://murderpedia.org/male.S/s/sutherland-cecil.htmTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, CECIL S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant. Docket No. 99047Access ad-free episodes, bonus content, and get all of the 11:59 Media Podcast library!Access hours of extra content each week, exclusive merch, and early access to new podcasts.Visit https://1159plus.com

UIM Statute Limited Coverage to Same as UM Coverage THE STATUTE CONTROLS Majdoleen A. Khattab, Administratrix of the Estate of Affan Mohamad Khattab, ("Appellant" or "the Estate"), appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment for Berkley Regional Insurance Company and Integon General Insurance (collectively, "the insurers"), and entering an order of declaratory judgment in favor of the insurers. In Majdoleen A. Khattab, Administrator, Estate of Affan Mohamad Khattab v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company; Integon General Insurance Corporation, No. 22-1462, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit (October 19, 2023) the Fourth Circuit interpreted the clear language of the statute and UM/UIM coverages. ISSUES At issue is an insurance policy issued by Berkley Regional Insurance Company. The policy has a general liability limit of $1,000,000 and an uninsured motorist coverage limit of $70,000. This case solely turns on the legal question of what the relevant coverage limit under the insurance policy is for an accident caused by a motorist whose insurance coverage is less than the amount of claimed damages and less than the amount of the general liability limit, but greater than the amount of the uninsured motorist coverage limit. Virginia mandates that an insurance policy's uninsured motorist coverage limits must match the policy's liability limits unless any one named insured rejects the additional uninsured motorist coverage by notifying the insurer as provided in the statute. There is no dispute that Berkley complied with the notice requirement for "uninsured/underinsured coverage limits" pursuant to the statute. There was no dispute that the insured properly limited the uninsured coverage to $70,000. With respect to underinsured coverage the statute provides that the policy shall also provide underinsured motorist insurance coverage with limits that shall be equal to the uninsured motorist insurance coverage limits and shall obligate the insurer to make payment for bodily injury or property damage caused by the operation or use of an underinsured motor vehicle to the extent the vehicle is underinsured. Appellant argues, the underinsured coverage limit remained at $1,000,000, equal to the policy's general liability limit. However, Appellant did not pay for a UIM coverage of $1 million. Appellant overlooks that the statutory default sets underinsured motorist coverage equal to uninsured motorist coverage, not the policy's general liability limit. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support

The case involves the validity of a lien and the distribution of funds related to a property sale. The Caldwell Trust had a lien on the property, which was subject to a tax lien by the City of Richmond. The Caldwell Trust argues that the judgment lien is an interest in property rights, protected under both the US Constitution and the Virginia Constitution.The City of Richmond argues that the Caldwell Trust's lien is subordinate to the tax lien and the deed of trust, which must be satisfied first. The trial court found that the deed of trust had a lien of $14,000, which the Caldwell Trust does not challenge. The Caldwell Trust argues that the City of Richmond cannot keep the $14,000, as it is not entitled to it. The City of Richmond argues that it can keep the money if the first lien holder does not show up within two years, according to a statute. The Caldwell Trust argues that the statute is problematic and violates property rights. A writ was granted on the following issues: The Trial Court erroneously ruled that Appellant's lien claim established under Va. Code § 58.1-3967 to the net tax sale proceeds to be distributed after payment in full of the City of Richmond's statutory tax lien is not a constitutionally protected private property interest in the Disputed Tax Sale Proceeds. The Trial Court erroneously failed to rule that the provisions of Va. Code § 58.1-3967 granting the City of Richmond the right to the Disputed Tax Sale Proceeds remaining after satisfaction of all obligations due the City of Richmond under its statutory tax lien was an unconstitutional taking of the Caldwell Trust's property right in the Disputed Tax Sale Proceeds without just compensation under the United States and Virginia Constitutions.

Plans for a new takeaway to open in Glanmire have stalled after an appeal was made over the number of fast-food outlets in the Cork town. Planning was granted for a Domino's Pizza to go ahead at a former Bank of Ireland building but an appeal has now been made to An Bord Pleanala. The Appellant states that around 20 percent of all businesses in the area are takeaway businesses and that a new outlet would also cause traffic issues. Our reporter Josh Crosbie has been to Glanmire to get some local reaction.

After Kent McGowen was convicted in 1994 for the murder of Susan White, his conviction was overturned during his appeals process. Kent went back to trial in 2002, and was again found guilty, but was sentenced to 20 years - five more years than his previous sentence. After Kent's release in 2021, he began fighting for his exoneration, while speaking out about the injustices within the criminal justice system.Kent's GiveSendGo for an attorneyhttps://givesendgo.com/G31TC?utm_source=sharelink&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_campaign=G31TCDon't forget to checkout the new website!www.fthatpod.comIf you liked what you heard today, give the podcast a like, review, and subscribe.Follow F**k That on Facebook, TikTok and Twitter @fthatpodInstagram @fthat_podThank you to this week's sources:SAMHSADisaster Technical Assistance Center Supplemental Research Bulletin First Responders: Behavioral Health Concerns, Emergency Response, and Trauma May, 2018 https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/dtac/supplementalresearchbulletin-firstresponders-may2018.pdfAmerican JusticeSeason 28: E2 Conversation with Todd Morong – shared with permissionApril 8th, 2023 Conversations with Kent McGowen – shared with permission Documentary – Abuse of Police Power Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).Joseph Kenton McGOWEN, Appellant, v.The STATE of Texas,Appellee. No. 14-94-00246-CR.Decided: July 20, 2000 EX PARTEJoseph Kenton McGowenAffidavit of Edward D. PorterAffadavit of Dan Cogdell State of Texas vs.Joseph K. McGowen May 1996 Harris County Sheriff's Department Identification Division Crime Laboratory Submission Report Deposition of Captain C.J. Harper November 3rd, 1992 Deposition of Major George Franklin SturgisAugust 13th, 1996 Voluntary StatementJeannie Jaques (Michael Shaffer's mother)September 3rd, 1992 Susan White's Arrest Warrant Supplemental Report: Case number 92-0825-0041Offense Report Defendant Information Witness Statement - Todd MorongUnits on Scene, Scene SummaryDetails of Offense Details of Wounds (prior to autopsy)Toxicology Results _________________________________________________ City of Houston Police Department – Office of Internal Affairs Report (name redacted) *This is the report regarding the woman Kent had a brief relationship with in HPD. I am redacting her name to keep her privacy, but I personally have copies of this document and have reviewed/verified it. Kent's Polygraph Exam regarding the above matter Kent's Resignation Letter to Houston Police DepartmentDecember 20th, 1988 Psychological Evaluation August 15th, 1989 ______________________________________________________________ A Warrant to Kill A True Story of Obsession, Lies, and a Killer CopBy: Kathryn Casey Susan White's Phone Records Tomball Police Department Letter of Recommendation Written by Chief Michna Kent's ResignationMarch 29th, 1990 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Title 1. Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 44.Appeal and Writ of Error https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.44.htm#:~:text=29%2C%201977.-,Art.,be%20released%20on%20reasonable%20bail. Statista Number of people shot to death by the police in the United States from 2017 to May 2023, by monthwww.statista.com/statistics/585159/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-month/#:~:text=As%20of%20May%201%2C%20the,police%20in%20the%20United%20States. Mapping Police Violencehttps://mappingpoliceviolence.org/ Kessler, R. C., Demler, O., Frank, R. G., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Walters, E. E., Wang, P., Wells, K. B., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2005). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. The New England journal of medicine, 352(24), 2515–2523. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa043266This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5741034/advertisement

After Harris County Deputy Kent McGowen fatally shot and killed Susan White on August 25th, 1992, ADA's Ed Porter and Don Smyth were immediately suspicious that this was not done in self-defense. Rumors began to swirl that Kent and Susan had a brief relationship, and once it was ended, Kent was left enraged. Depositions showed that Susan believed she was being sexually harassed by Kent, but no formal reports or complaints were made. Investigators were soon convinced Susan White's death was not self-defense, and Kent was indicted by a Grand Jury on October 27th, 1992. Kent was found guilty and was sentenced to 15 years on March 11th, 1994, but due toTexas law regarding bonds pending appeal, Kent was able to stay out of prison during the appeals process.Kent's GiveSendGo for an attorneyhttps://givesendgo.com/G31TC?utm_source=sharelink&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_campaign=G31TCDon't forget to checkout the new website!www.fthatpod.comIf you liked what you heard today, give the podcast a like, review, and subscribe.Follow F**k That on Facebook, TikTok and Twitter @fthatpodInstagram @fthat_podThank you to this week's sources:American JusticeSeason 28: E2 Conversation with Todd Morong – shared with permissionApril 8th, 2023 Conversations with Kent McGowen – shared with permission Documentary – Abuse of Police Power Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).Joseph Kenton McGOWEN, Appellant, v.The STATE of Texas,Appellee. No. 14-94-00246-CR.Decided: July 20, 2000 EX PARTEJoseph Kenton McGowenAffidavit of Edward D. PorterAffadavit of Dan Cogdell State of Texas vs.Joseph K. McGowen May 1996 Harris County Sheriff's Department Identification Division Crime Laboratory Submission Report Deposition of Captain C.J. Harper November 3rd, 1992 Deposition of Major George Franklin SturgisAugust 13th, 1996 Voluntary StatementJeannie Jaques (Michael Shaffer's mother)September 3rd, 1992 Susan White's Arrest Warrant Supplemental Report: Case number 92-0825-0041Offense Report Defendant Information Witness Statement - Todd MorongUnits on Scene, Scene SummaryDetails of Offense Details of Wounds (prior to autopsy)Toxicology Results _________________________________________________ City of Houston Police Department – Office of Internal Affairs Report (name redacted) *This is the report regarding the woman Kent had a brief relationship with in HPD. I am redacting her name to keep her privacy, but I personally have copies of this document and have reviewed/verified it. Kent's Polygraph Exam regarding the above matter Kent's Resignation Letter to Houston Police DepartmentDecember 20th, 1988 Psychological Evaluation August 15th, 1989 ______________________________________________________________ A Warrant to Kill A True Story of Obsession, Lies, and a Killer CopBy: Kathryn Casey Susan White's Phone Records Tomball Police Department Letter of Recommendation Written by Chief Michna Kent's ResignationMarch 29th, 1990 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Title 1. Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 44.Appeal and Writ of Error https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.44.htm#:~:text=29%2C%201977.-,Art.,be%20released%20on%20reasonable%20bail. Statista Number of people shot to death by the police in the United States from 2017 to May 2023, by monthwww.statista.com/statistics/585159/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-month/#:~:text=As%20of%20May%201%2C%20the,police%20in%20the%20United%20States. Mapping Police Violencehttps://mappingpoliceviolence.org/ Kessler, R. C., Demler, O., Frank, R. G., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Walters, E. E., Wang, P., Wells, K. B., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2005). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. The New England journal of medicine, 352(24), 2515–2523. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa043266This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5741034/advertisement

Kent McGowen became a police officer with the Houston Police Department in the 1980's. While his career wasn't perfect, it didn't come under scrutiny until he was employed with the Harris County Sheriff's Office. While serving a warrant, Deputy Kent McGowen shot and killed Susan White. While Kent fought to argue his innocence due to self-defense, many others claimed otherwise.Part one unpacks the tangled story surrounding the controversial case of Deputy Kent McGowen and the tragic death of Susan White. This episode examines their backgrounds, shedding light on Kent's extensive law enforcement career, and unraveling the sequence of events that culminated into the fateful night of August 25th, 1992.Don't forget to checkout the new website!www.fthatpod.comIf you liked what you heard today, give the podcast a like, review, and subscribe.Follow F**k That on Facebook, TikTok and Twitter @fthatpodInstagram @fthat_podThank you to this week's sources: American JusticeSeason 28: E2 Conversation with Todd Morong – shared with permissionApril 8th, 2023 Conversations with Kent McGowen – shared with permission Documentary – Abuse of Police Power Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.)Joseph Kenton McGOWEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 14-94-00246-CR. Decided: July 20, 2000 Harris County Sheriff's Department Identification Division Crime Laboratory Submission Report Deposition of Captain C.J. HarperNovember 3rd, 1992 Deposition of Major George Franklin SturgisAugust 13th, 1996 Voluntary Statement Jeannie Jaques (Michael Shaffer's mother)September 3rd, 1992 Susan White's Arrest Warrant Supplemental Report: Case number 92-0825-0041Offense ReportDefendant InformationWitness Statement - Todd MorongUnits on Scene, Scene SummaryDetails of Offense Details of Wounds (prior to autopsy)Toxicology Results _________________________________________________ City of Houston Police DepartmentOffice of Internal Affairs Report (name redacted)*This is the report regarding the woman Kent had a brief relationship with in HPD. I am redacting her name to maintain her privacy Kent's Polygraph Exam regarding the above matter Kent's Resignation Letter to Houston Police DepartmentDecember 20th, 1988 Psychological Evaluation August 15th, 1989 ______________________________________________________________ A Warrant to Kill A True Story of Obsession, Lies, and a Killer CopBy: Kathryn Casey Susan White's Phone Records Tomball Police Department Letter of RecommendationWritten by Chief Michna Kent's ResignationMarch 29th, 1990 StatistaNumber of people shot to death by the police in the United States from 2017 to May 2023, by month www.statista.com/statistics/585159/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-month/#:~:text=As%20of%20May%201%2C%20the,police%20in%20the%20United%20States. Mapping Police Violence https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/ Michna retires early, interim chief appointedhttps://www.chron.com/neighborhood/article/Michna-retires-early-interim-chief-appointed-9916473.php Kessler, R. C., Demler, O., Frank, R. G., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Walters, E. E., Wang, P., Wells, K. B., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2005). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. The New England journal of medicine, 352(24), 2515–2523. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa043266This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5741034/advertisement

Gonzalez v. Trevino involves an alleged retaliatory conspiracy of city officials from Castle Hills, Texas to arrest Sylvia Gonzalez—a 72-year-old councilwoman—for spearheading a nonbinding petition criticizing the city's manager. Gonzalez acknowledges that there was probable cause for her arrest and appellants asserted a qualified immunity defense. The district court denied Appellants' motion to dismiss.On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reversed the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to dismiss, finding Appellee failed to establish a violation of her constitutional rights. Notable dissents were issued by Judges Oldham (from the panel opinion) and Ho (from the denial of en banc review). Anya Bidwell and the Institute for Justice have petitioned the Supreme Court for review.Please join us as Ms. Bidwell discusses qualified immunity, the First Amendment, and the Fifth Circuit's decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino.

Question: Once an appellant has filed a notice of appeal, what situations may that appellant request that prosecution be reopened for? Answer: Once appellant has filed a notice of appeal, appellant also may request that prosecution be reopened for the following situations: In response to a new ground of rejection made in an examiner's answer, appellant may file a reply in compliance with 37 CFR 1.111 that addresses the new ground of rejection within two months from the mailing of the examiner's answer In response to a substitute examiner's answer that is written in response to a remand by the… The post MPEP Q & A 270: Once an appellant has filed a notice of appeal, what situations may that appellant request that prosecution be reopened for? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

This case is about whether the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) erred in conducting their factual sufficiency review. Appellant alleges they required him to prove his mistake of fact defense with “direct evidence.” Connect with us on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) Connect with us on Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

This case is about whether the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) erred in conducting their factual sufficiency review. Appellant alleges they required him to prove his mistake of fact defense with “direct evidence.” Connect with us on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) Connect with us on Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

Learn about the murder of Christy Lynne Espinosa, who was set on fire the day after Mardi Gras in 2009 in Austin, Texas. Married couple, Martha Hernandez and Kenneth Hernandez, were both charged with her gruesome murder. In The Shade Episode 7 Sources Caselaw, Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. Kenneth Hernandez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee (https://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1639089.html) True Crime and Chill, The Mardi Gras Murder (https://truecrimeandchill.com/season-2/the-mardi-gras-murder/) Carnival New Orleans, Hernandez Gets 60 years in Mardi Gras Killing (http://blog.carnivalneworleans.com/?p=4025) My Death Space, Christy Espinosa (21) was strangled to death by a married couple, dumped in a field, and then set on fire (http://mydeathspace.com/article/2009/03/12/Christy_Espinosa_(21)_was_strangled_to_death_by_a_married_couple__dumped_in_a_field__and_then_set_on_fire) Austin-American Statesman, Obituaries, Christy Lynne Espinosa (https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/statesman/name/christy-espinosa-obituary?pid=124715448) Austin-American Statesman, Jurors hear two versions from accused in Mardi Gras murder trial (https://www.statesman.com/story/news/local/2012/09/01/jurors-hear-two-versions-from-accused-in-mardi-gras-murder-trial/9812022007/) Find a Grave, Christy Lynne Espinosa (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/164123436/christy-lynne-espinosa#:~:text=Her%20body%20was%20set%20on,to%2060%20years%20in%20prison) #truecrime #BIPOC #truecrimepodcast #intheshade #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #podcast #womenpodcasters #intheshadepodcast #ITSpodcast #BIPOCpodcsaster #POCpodcaster #ChristyLynneEspinosa #Marthahernandez #Kennethhernandez #Austinmurder

Houston takes us on a saddening journey on this episode. A teenage murderer… the crime is unthinkable.Suggestions or stories:CrimeOrReason@gmail.comFollow us, Listen to us, & Contact us:https://linktr.ee/crimeorreasonPetition:www.change.orgPetition · Repeal Law That Could Free Elizabeth Olten's Murderer Alyssa ...Episode Resources:allthatsinteresting.comAlyssa Bustamante: The 15-Year-Old Who Murdered A 9-Year-Old Girlmurderpedia.orgAlyssa Bustamantehttps://www.thefamouspeople.com › ...Alyssa Bustamante Biography - Facts, Childhood, Family Life of Murdererhttps://caselaw.findlaw.com › mo-co...Alyssa D. Bustamante, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.www.crimeandinvestigation.co.ukAlyssa Bustamante

On the night of November 5, 1989, first responders arrived at the 3700 block of Delor St in St Louis, Missouri. Inside of an apartment, next to two bloody knives, lay the body of 16-year-old Tina Isa. Tina's father said that he had killed her in self-defense. Police would learn Tina's father, Zein Isa, was a suspected ringleader of a Palestinian terrorist cell and had been under the watchful eye and ear of the FBI. The Isa's house had been bugged for some time and Tina's abuse and murder had been caught on tape. Join Cam and Jen as we talk about Die, My Daughter, Die: The Murder of Tina Isa.Big Thanks to:Edward October @OctoberpodVHS for our listener discretion. Please take a listen to him on YouTube! https://www.youtube.com/c/octoberpodhomevideoNico Vettesse, our Producer does all music and editing.wetalkofdress.comEileen MacFarlane of @Crimelapse researched and wrote today's episode. Jen would be lost without her. Promo is from our friends a Crime Trials Podcast. Sources:https://stlouispatina.com/north-st-louis/https://www.amazon.com/Guarding-Secrets-Palestinian-Terrorism-Too-American-ebook/dp/B07CGWZRGS/ref=sr_1_5?crid=1TKFOC7PVGFP7&keywords=ellen+harris&qid=1646537688&s=books&sprefix=ellen+harris%2Cstripbooks%2C255&sr=1-5https://amp.southcoasttoday.com/amp/50334837007https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1993-06-13-9306130207-story.html850 S.W.2d 876 (1993), STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Maria ISA, Appellant., No. 74479. - https://law.justia.com/cases/missouri/supreme-court/1993/74479-0.html "Girl, 16, Slain By Father'She Came At Me' He Tells Police." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 7, 1989: 1A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C61203C3751."Man Charged In Killing Of Daughter." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 8, 1989: 3A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C61961FD9A3."Dead Girl Abused,School Told State." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 9, 1989: 4C. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C61E4A53BFB."Woman Joins Husband As Suspect In Daughter's Fatal Stabbing." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 1, 1989: 5b. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C6A2D6B61B5."2 Charged With Murder In Daughter's Stabbing." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 17, 1989: 8C. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C6FEE89D3F0."Murder Suspects BuggedSecret U.S. Inquiry Netted 'Chilling' Tape Of Killing." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, January 17, 1990: 1a. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C86C3BD194F."Killing Exposes An InvestigationSuspected Links To PLO Lead To evidence Against Parents In Girl's Death." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, March 12, 1990: 3D. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04C9AD920E361."Daughter's Killing Laid To Culture Clash." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 22, 1991: 3A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D627381B6ED."Tapes Implicate FatherFBI Bug Catches Vow, To Put Her 'In Grave'." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 23, 1991: 1A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D62B20B4077."Tapes Implicate Father In Killing." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 23, 1991: 10A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D62B0F97A2D."Slain Girl, Parents Were Quarreling, Counselor Testifies." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 23, 1991: 3A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D62A160419F."Girl Demanded $5,000, Attacked Him, Father Says." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 25, 1991: 1A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D6359151BE6."'When The Glass Is Broken, It Can Not Be Repaired'." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 25, 1991: 3A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D634D3CDF77."Conflict ... Cultures Clashed, 'Honor' Bruised, So Child Is Killed." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 27, 1991: 1A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D63CEAA6FA1."Wiretap Of Slain Girl's Home Called Part Of War Effort." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 29, 1991: 12C. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D6494E249BD."Corrections." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 30, 1991: 2a. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D64D5AA944A."Chilling tape leads to murder conviction of teen's parents." Fort Worth Star-Telegram, November 1, 1991: 6. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EAF8E3DE0E65CB4."TWA Supes Come From Far And Wide To Hear Accolades." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 10, 1991: 1C. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D6818B486B4. "PARENTS SENTENCED TO DEATH IN DAUGHTER'S TAPED SLAYING." Press-Telegram (Long Beach, CA), December 20, 1991: A26. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EAE8D71DF4356D5."Parents Get Death In Teen's Murder." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 20, 1991: 1A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D745AA69DF8."No More Bloodshed For The Isas." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 23, 1991: 2B. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D7511B4D14C."Why The Isas Got The Death Penalty." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 28, 1991: 2B. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D7644F39D61."St. Louis Region ... Rampaging Murder, Courtroom Dramas A Jittery Economy." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 29, 1991: 1B. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04D7687C1008C."Marchers Mark Beginning Of Victims' Rights Week." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, April 27, 1992: 3A. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04DA32A17DBF9."Moral Relativism? 'You Don't Get It' ... Notion That All Behaviors Are Morally Equivalent Tears At Societal Fabric." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 21, 1992: 3B. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04DB2B84BC235."A LIVELY STORY OF A DULL TRIAL." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, March 14, 1993: 5C. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB04E0A80F37449."Racine man arrested in terrorist case." The Milwaukee Journal, April 1, 1993: A1. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB827BFA9FEE185."MARIA ISA GIVEN NEW SENTENCE - LIFE IN PRISON." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 21, 1997: 11. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB050507AFE24BA."IT'S TIME TO MOVE ON, SAYS DEE JOYCE-HAYES." St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 1, 2000: E1. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0EB052B504D1E1D2."CONVICTION COULD PUT WOMAN ON MISSOURI DEATH ROW - SHE WOULD BE ONLY 6TH WOMAN CONDEMNED IN STATE SINCE 1977 NONE WAS EXECUTED." St. Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), April 20, 2003: D1. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/0FA8C002939B9068."John R. Roussin Longtime homicide detective." St. Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), March 29, 2005: C4. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/10928583D0D5A6B3."LAW & ORDER." St. Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), May 1, 2014: A4. NewsBank: Access World News. https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=AWNB&docref=news/14D898FA8A951B40.https://www.nydailynews.com/news/justice-story/justice-story-honor-killing-article-1.1510125https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2644&context=facpub

Appellate attorney and Author Myron Moskovitz joins Tim Kowal and Jeff Lewis to discuss appellate writing tips, the importance of the Appellant's Reply Brief and Moot Arguments and his books teaching appellate tips.Appellate Specialist Myron Moskovitz's biography.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Sign up for Tim Kowal's Weekly Legal Update, or view his blog of recent cases.Resources mentioned in this episode:Myron's books, Winning an Appeal and Strategies on Appeal

I'm sure we've all had our share of neighbors that aren't that neighborly...... this weeks case talks about one of them. Terrika has the case this week! Get your drink ready by going here: Refreshing sparkling mocktails with mint, basil, and rosemary | Fab Everyday You can check out our sources here: Amid feud with neighbor over feeding deer, Minnesota man is slain – The Mercury News Ramsey County State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Neal Curtis Zumberge, Appellant. | FindLaw Surveillance video, evidence released in New Brighton neighbor murder case (fox9.com) If you like this episode we'd love for you to give us a review, like and share!!! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/mocktails-cocktails-and-murder/support

Follow Dan on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/cotterdan Follow Pat on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/donald-patrick-eckler-69880814/ Follow the show at: https://www.linkedin.com/company/podium-and-panel-podcast Predictions Sure to Go Wrong:  The oral argument before the Seventh Circuit in Appellant v. Appellee is here: http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/ds.20-3050.20-3050_03_31_2021.mp3 The oral argument in Continental Casualty v. Lloyd's is here:  http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/ds.20-2892.20-2892_04_02_2021.mp3 The oral argument in Bilek v. Federal Insurance is here: http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/ds.20-2504.20-2504_04_02_2021.mp3 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 28j can found here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_28 Pat's article on ediscvoery wioth Howard Pikel is here: https://www.pretzel-stouffer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Late-to-the-Party.pdf --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app