Podcasts about Vicarious

Detailed Sermon Summary “Standing Where God Made a Way” Pastor Bryan Hudson, D.Min. Part 5 of the “Rooted & Grounded”  Watch the 14 minute video: "The Road to Juneteenth" Pastor Bryan Hudson's sermon, “Standing Where God Made a Way,” connects the biblical account of Israel crossing the Jordan River in Joshua 4 with the historical meaning of Juneteenth. The central message is that believers, families, communities, and nations must remember the places where God brought deliverance, because remembrance preserves gratitude, identity, wisdom, and responsibility. The sermon begins by framing Juneteenth as more than a national holiday. It is presented as a memorial of deliverance and a reminder that God makes a way where there is no way. Dr. Hudson connects Juneteenth to the broader biblical theme of God delivering people from bondage, especially Israel's deliverance from Egypt and later their crossing into the Promised Land. He also references his video, “The Road to Juneteenth,” which traces the journey from emancipation declared to freedom enforced. Joshua 4: Remembering the Crossing The primary Scripture is Joshua 4:1–11, where God commands Joshua to have twelve men, one from each tribe of Israel, take twelve stones from the Jordan River after the people crossed on dry ground. These stones were to be set up as a memorial so that future generations would ask, “What do these stones mean?” The answer would preserve the story of how God cut off the waters of the Jordan and brought His people through. Dr. Hudson explains that this crossing parallels the Red Sea crossing under Moses forty years earlier. In both cases, God removed a barrier that His people could not remove on their own. The Jordan River was not always deep, but it did flood seasonally. God stopped the waters so Israel could cross, then instructed them to take stones from the riverbed—stones that were normally hidden—and make them visible as a testimony. A key insight is that the stones were not objects of worship. They were reminders of the God who acted. The stones pointed beyond themselves to God's power, faithfulness, and deliverance. Juneteenth as a Stone of Remembrance Dr. Hudson then connects Joshua's stones to Juneteenth. Just as Israel needed memorial stones to remember deliverance, African Americans and the nation need Juneteenth as a memorial of freedom delayed, freedom enforced, and freedom remembered. He explains that the Emancipation Proclamation was issued in 1862 and took effect on January 1, 1863, but freedom was not fully enforced in Texas until June 19, 1865, when Union troops arrived in Galveston and announced General Order No. 3. This shows one of the sermon's major historical lessons: freedom declared is not always freedom practiced. Justice often requires enforcement. Juneteenth, therefore, is not merely a celebration. It is a memorial, an educational moment, and a call to remember both God's deliverance and the human struggle required for justice. Theological Foundation: Human Dignity and the Image of God A major theological point in the sermon is that all people are made in the image and likeness of God. Because of this, no person or group has the right to dominate, dehumanize, enslave, or exploit another. Dr. Hudson emphasizes the importance of saying “enslaved people” rather than simply “slaves.” To call someone a slave can make bondage sound like their identity. But their true identity is that they were human beings made in God's image who were enslaved by others. This point becomes the moral foundation for the sermon's critique of slavery, racism, domination, and exploitation. Slavery was especially evil because it involved humans made in God's image enslaving other humans made in God's image. A Sober View of American History The sermon also calls for honesty about American history. Dr. Hudson says Juneteenth should never have been necessary. If the nation had truly lived up to biblical principles from the beginning, enslaving Africans would never have been tolerated. He notes that the founders debated slavery and compromised in order to form the nation. Some opposed slavery, while others wanted to preserve it because of the economic benefits of free labor. That compromise, he explains, carried a terrible cost and eventually helped lead to the Civil War. Dr. Hudson does not reject love for the nation, but he urges listeners to avoid “rosy narratives” that ignore the blood, suffering, and injustice woven into the nation's history. The proper response is gratitude mixed with sobriety, remembrance, and responsibility. God Still Makes a Way The sermon repeatedly returns to the message that there are always barriers to cross. God parted the Red Sea under Moses. God stopped the Jordan River under Joshua. God made a way for enslaved people through emancipation and enforcement. And God still makes a way for His people today. Dr. Hudson says that today's breakthroughs may not always look as dramatic as the Red Sea or Jordan crossings, but the principle remains the same: when God brings people through obstacles, they should remember, testify, and move forward in faith. Memorials Are Educational Another key theme is that memorials are meant to teach. In Joshua 4, the stones were designed to provoke questions from children. When the children asked what the stones meant, the older generation was responsible to explain God's deliverance. Dr. Hudson applies this to holidays such as Juneteenth, Thanksgiving, Easter, Memorial Day, Veterans Day, and others. These are not merely days off or occasions for celebration. They are opportunities to educate, remember sacrifice, and pass meaning to the next generation. He warns that routines, celebrations, and comfort can obscure legacy. People can enjoy the benefits of history without remembering the sacrifice that made those benefits possible. Therefore, remembrance must be intentional. Standing Where God Made a Way The title phrase, “Standing Where God Made a Way,” captures the sermon's central conviction. Dr. Hudson teaches that many of us are living in places of blessing that exist because God worked through previous generations. We are standing on ground made possible by God's intervention, people's prayers, sacrifices, faith, courage, and perseverance. This applies personally, spiritually, historically, and nationally. We stand where parents, grandparents, ancestors, saints, activists, soldiers, and faithful servants endured hardship so future generations could live differently. Twelve Contemporary Stones of Remembrance Near the end, Dr. Hudson gives twelve “stones” that people and families can set up as memorials today. These are practices and places that help preserve memory, identity, and gratitude: Education — learning the truth and teaching it to others. Vicarious living — learning through the lives and experiences of others rather than repeating their mistakes. Identification — seeing oneself connected to faithful and courageous people from the past. Honoring — highly valuing parents, elders, ancestors, and those who made sacrifices. Testimony — telling what God has done personally and collectively. Studying history — learning the real story, not only simplified or sanitized versions. Serving others — turning remembrance into action. Shared experience — building memories and meaning together as families and communities. Museums — places such as Freetown Village that preserve and teach history. Family gatherings — moments that connect generations. Anniversaries — recurring opportunities to remember God's faithfulness. Juneteenth — a national and spiritual stone of remembrance that points to deliverance, justice, and responsibility. These “stones” help people stay rooted. They prevent forgetfulness. They help connect the present generation to legacy and history. Final Exhortation The sermon closes with a call to preserve memories that are worth preserving. Dr. Hudson urges listeners to be intentional with their children, grandchildren, families, and communities. If people do not connect present blessings with past deliverance, they may lose their way in the future. The final prayer thanks God for His goodness, for ancestors and heroes known and unknown, and for the fact that we are standing where God made a way. The prayer also asks God to help His people remember, honor, educate, and never take His blessings—or the people He used—for granted. Core Message The sermon's core message is: God makes a way through impossible barriers, and His people must remember where He brought them from. Memorials—whether stones, holidays, testimonies, museums, family stories, or historical observances like Juneteenth—help us honor God, educate future generations, and move forward without forgetting the sacrifices that made our present blessings possible.

In this episode of the Tactical Living Podcast, hosts Coach Ashlie Walton and Sergeant Clint Walton talk about something that does not get nearly enough attention in conversations about first responder wellness (Amazon Affiliate #AD): the trauma that does not happen on the job — it happens at home, to the family members who love someone who carries it there. Secondary trauma is real. It is measurable. And it is quietly affecting the spouses, children, and families of first responders in ways that most people never connect back to the job. This episode gives families language for what they have been experiencing, validates the weight they carry without a badge or a uniform, and opens an honest conversation about what it actually means to love someone who does this work.

The preacher explains vicarious or substitutional atonement undertaken by the Lord Jesus Christ on behalf of sinners.

This episode dives into the core doctrines and practical strategies essential for understanding complex tort law scenarios. Whether tackling issues of deep pockets, vicarious liability, or death and survival claims, you'll gain clarity on how to dissect any torts question with confidence and precision.Most legal professionals overlook the hidden power behind "deep pockets": the ability to locate the real source of payment in complex tort cases. This episode pulls back the curtain on how savvy attorneys find and unlock these financial reservoirs, revealing the strategic playbook that can turn a wrongful injury into a victorious recovery. If you're fed up with traditional, surface-level litigation strategies and want to master the art of financial risk-shifting, this is your essential guide.We explore the critical doctrines shaping liability—vicarious liability, joint tortfeasors, contribution, and indemnification—through real-world scenarios that expose how these principles operate in practice. Why is vicarious liability often a game-changer, and how can it be wielded to force corporations and negligent parties to pay, even when their direct fault seems minimal? You'll discover the nuanced distinction between detours and frolics, and how a seemingly minor deviation during a delivery route can shift liability entirely.This episode breaks down the complex mechanics of joint and several liability, revealing why courts often force deep-pocketed entities to pay the entire judgment—highlighting the controversial policies behind victim protection versus fairness among defendants. Gain insight into the timing and procedural intricacies of contribution and indemnification, and learn how to dissect multi-defendant cases with surgical precision, avoiding common traps that can undermine your case.Finally, we delve into the tragic realm of death and injury, explaining survival actions and wrongful death claims with concrete examples that illuminate how damages are calculated—and how courts protect doctrinal boundaries to prevent double recovery. Whether preparing for exams or sharpening litigation techniques, you'll walk away with a clear, structured methodology to analyze any tort scenario confidently. This is more than legal theory—it's a strategic map for making justice—and money—reach those who deserve it.Perfect for new attorneys, seasoned litigators, and law students aiming to elevate their practical mastery. Your journey from understanding to commanding complex liability frameworks starts here.In this episode:The importance of identifying the true deep pocket at the end of the legal chain to ensure effective risk allocation.The mechanics of vicarious liability, including respondeat superior, scope of employment, and the significance of detours versus frolics.How to distinguish between independent contractors and employees, and the exceptions for inherently dangerous activities and non-delegable duties.The detailed analysis of joint and several liability, contribution, and indemnification, especially in multi-defendant scenarios.Navigating death-related claims: survival actions versus wrongful death, and how courts handle pre-impact fright and double recovery.A disciplined three-step exam strategy: recognize the theory, check elements methodically, and hunt for trap issues like contributory negligence or superseding causes.Practical use of the framework through clinical hypotheticals, emphasizing the real-world application of legal doctrines.

La verità non è più un bene pubblico o un ideale morale. È diventata un asset finanziario privato, un titolo scambiabile su un mercato deregolamentato.  Gli articoli citati nella puntata sono i seguenti: Abhorrent': the inside story of the Polymarket gamblers betting millions on war, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/apr/11/polymarket-gamblers-betting-iran-war-ukraine-news-truth; Exclusive: Trader made nearly $1 million on Polymarket with remarkably accurate Iran bets, https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/24/politics/iran-war-bets-prediction-markets; From Iran to Taylor Swift: Informed Trading in Prediction Markets, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/03/25/from-iran-to-taylor-swift-informed-trading-in-prediction-markets/; Iran war puts prediction markets back in the spotlight, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/iran- Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In episode 116, we're joined by Dr. Beth Stelson, Assistant Professor at Washington University in St. Louis, to unpack an often invisible, but consequential, workplace hazard: vicarious trauma.Vicarious trauma occurs when workers are repeatedly exposed to other people's traumatic experiences, leading to psychological and physiological stress responses—even when they haven't experienced the trauma firsthand. This is especially common among healthcare workers, social workers, substance use disorder professionals, and other helping professions, yet it's rarely treated as a core occupational health issue.We explore:* What vicarious trauma is and how it differs from burnout and PTSD* Why focusing only on symptoms misses the root of the problem* How repeated exposure to trauma at work affects mental health, physical health, job satisfaction, and turnover* New evidence linking vicarious trauma to serious physical health outcomes* The Vicarious Occupational Trauma Exposure (VOTE) Index, a new tool designed to measure where and how trauma exposure happens in the workplace* Why prevention requires organizational and system‑level interventions, not just individual self‑careThis conversation reframes vicarious trauma as a workplace hazard, similar to chemical exposure or noise exposure, and makes a compelling case for redesigning work, increasing organizational responsibility, and protecting the health of the workers our communities depend on most.If you work in healthcare, social services, public health, or any trauma‑exposed role, or if you manage, study, or support people who do, this episode offers a powerful, research‑driven look at why vicarious trauma matters and what can actually be done about it.You can find Dr. Stelson here: https://publichealth.washu.edu/faculty/elisabeth-stelson/You can find the VOTE here: https://psycnet.apa.org/psycarticles/2027-28298-001.pdf This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit healthywork.substack.com

Teachers are burning out in 2026 — and we need to stop apologizing for rest.In this episode of Conversations Unleashed, Michael Bonner breaks down teacher burnout, vicarious trauma, spring break recovery, shifting classroom expectations, and the growing reality of AI in education. With $6–12 billion cut from education funding last year, the conversation around replacing teachers with artificial intelligence is no longer theoretical — it's strategic.If you are an educator, administrator, or parent concerned about teacher mental health, AI in schools, or the future of education funding, this episode is for you.Topics Covered:• Teacher burnout in 2026• Vicarious trauma in education• Why rest is not weakness• AI replacing teachers• Education funding cuts• Classroom accountability and celebration shifts• Systemic reform in schoolsSubscribe for weekly conversations on education leadership, AI, personal growth, and legacy-buildi

Episode 282-Court Tosses Polatov Cocktail on Gun Law Also Available OnSearchable Podcast Transcript Gun Lawyer — Episode Transcript Gun Lawyer Transcript – Episode 282 SUMMARY KEYWORDS Polytoph case, gun rights, New Jersey gun law, firearms purchaser identification card, second amendment, public health, safety, welfare, Bruen decision, essential character of temperament, weasel clause, gun denial, federal case law, voluntary registration, gun lawyer. SPEAKERS Speaker 2, Robert Bell, Teddy Nappen, Evan Nappen Evan Nappen  00:17 I’m Evan Nappen. Teddy Nappen  00:19 And I’m Teddy Nappen, Evan Nappen  00:21 And welcome to Gun Lawyer with a very exciting show today, because we are going to learn about Pearl Harbor. No, it’s all about a different issue. What we are learning about, though, is a great case that just came down from the Appellate Division that my firm was fighting for our client here. It is a really amazing case that is a published decision, and this is very important to understand. In New Jersey, when a decision is deemed published, it means it is law. It acts as law. And the great attorney who argued this case for the firm, and did, in fact, do the appeal as well, is Robert Bell. Rob, welcome to Gun Lawyer. Robert Bell  01:23 Thank you. Great to be here. Evan Nappen  01:25 All right, man. So, we’re all very excited about the (Mikhail) Polatov case, and that’s why we’re saying that the “Court Tossed a Polatov Cocktail on New Jersey Gun Law”. Because this case, which is a great win, actually had some very, very important impacts on our gun rights and in future fights in the courts over gun laws. Why don’t you tell us about this case, Rob, and where we’re at and what’s happened. Go right ahead. Robert Bell  02:03 Certainly. So, Mikhail’s journey in trying to exercise his Second Amendment rights started back in 2020. He applied for a Firearms Purchaser Identification Card and was denied. Not on the basis of any convictions, restraining orders, substance abuse, or anything like that. Nothing objective. Just a 2011 misdemeanor charge that was dismissed and something back in 2002. So, it’s all very remote, and neither of them resulted in convictions, anyway. He gets denied, and he appeals it. He gets in front of our favorite Bergen County judge. I don’t need to say his name, but you can look into the record and find it yourself. Robert Bell  02:51 Don’t worry. He listens to the show. So, it’s okay. Robert Bell  02:56 So, he gets in front of this judge, and he testifies about what happened in 2011 in New York during this incident that was dismissed. And it’s not that the Judge disliked the behavior. He just disliked his “cavalier attitude about it” and denied the permit. Fast forward to 2023. Mikhail applies again, and this time his wife applies as well. Both denied. Simply on the basis of a previous denial. They appeal it. They deny the wife simply because she lives with him, and they deny him because he was dishonest with us before. And if he’s telling the truth now, it means he was either lying then or lying now. It doesn’t matter. It was just a catch 22 of you lied at some point, and I don’t like that. You are not of the essential character of temperament necessary to be entrusted with a firearm. And that’s that, that was the, the addition to the weasel clause that I think our viewers know, right? Evan Nappen  04:11 So, let’s do, let’s explain a little bit. The disqualifiers that exist in the gun laws under (Chapter) 58. There’s a list of what we often call the per se disqualifiers, where somebody like if you’re a convicted felon, it’s a per se disqualifier. And virtually everybody knows that. But New Jersey has this catch-all, the all-inclusive miscellaneous weasel clause that we refer to as “public health, safety, and welfare”. And that provision, that basis for denial is the area where we see the most significant abuse, particularly racist abuse. Where there’s a disproportionate denial of blacks by more than two and a half times to whites. It is the section of the law that is fraught with abuse on stopping the individual from being able to get licensed. The law was changed in New Jersey from just “public health, safety, and welfare”, but adding the phrase about “based on character of temperament”. Well, Rob, why did they add that? Why don’t you tell listeners why? You know the history. Why was that put in there? Robert Bell  05:26 In June 2022, when the (United States) Supreme Court issued the Bruen decision, the anti-gun states, the gun the rights oppressors in New Jersey, New York, California, Maryland, and Massachusetts, were absolutely seething. And they have been going on a temper tantrum ever since. In December 2022, they decided to pass that temper tantrum into legislation that was signed by the governor immediately. And it added “. . . the essential character of temperament necessary to be entrusted with a firearm.” Where they found that was in footnote one of the Bruen opinion. Footnote one of the Bruen opinion explains the laws of multiple states, including that of Connecticut, and they quoted a case called Dwyer versus Farrell. Now, Dwyer versus Farrell is a Connecticut case about the firearms laws. Robert Bell  06:16 However, the Supreme Court quoted Dwyer versus Farrell, and they had a phrase in it, essential character of temperament, necessary to be entrusted with a firearm. However, the Supreme Court of the United States unfortunately has a typo in that footnote. It actually reads “character or temperament”. So, we know exactly what they were doing. They were just combing that decision, looking for anything and everything to keep this unctuous statute going for as long as they possibly can so that they can continue oppressing gun rights. So, now we have a phrase in the weasel clause that is a result of the legislature copying somebody else’s homework and passing it off as a sensible phrase, because it makes no sense. Evan Nappen  07:05 And now it’s actually. But Rob, now it’s actually had the opposite effect of what they intended. Because in this case law, it creates a limitation, as expressed in Polatov, as to what that actually means, right? Robert Bell  07:24 Correct. They actually have spoken up on what that means, and it’s in part because I pointed out where it came from. I think. Evan Nappen  07:32 I think you’re right. No, absolutely, it’s why. And now what is that phrase now mean in New Jersey, as it applies to the entire weasel clause now, right? Because it modifies the whole weasel clause. What is the standard that has now been determined by Polatov? By that case. Robert Bell  07:53 They seem to have rejected my original argument that it requires repetitive misconduct. But then they go on to say, “character of temperament” means the basic defining qualities of a person’s emotional response. And to lack the basic qualities of one’s emotional response means to have no stable or consistent emotional core necessary for responsible action. In other words, to be so volatile that armament would endanger the interest of the public health, safety or welfare. I don’t know how you prove that someone’s volatile without pointing to multiple instance of misconduct, but. Evan Nappen  08:30 But they are basing that, very importantly, on Koons v. Platkin, correct? Robert Bell  08:40 Correct. Evan Nappen  08:40 Now, what is the quote that the Court relies upon, which is extremely significant, because now we have, for the first time, a New Jersey appellate case law getting published utilizing the federal win, the federal law in our favor, and now that becomes part of New Jersey state law fighting, right? It’s very significant. It bridges the state to the federal. What did they do, Rob? What did they do? Robert Bell  09:16 They quoted Koons v Platkin when they said that the weasel clause must focus on whether the applicant armed with a firearm poses a danger to the public. So, we’re running in circles with vague rules. Evan Nappen  09:31 But now we have the standard of the violence and danger to public. We’ve seen many times in the denial that it has nothing. They put forward nothing to do with violence or danger that they don’t ever deny, as this case illustrates. What did the judge deny him for? Nothing having to do with violence? Robert Bell  09:57 Credibility. Evan Nappen  09:59 Right! Robert Bell  09:59 Credibility. Evan Nappen  10:00 Which is not a basis. And so, this is going to have the effect of cutting down a lot of the wrongful denials that we’ve encountered, that we’ve seen. Robert Bell  10:13 It’s certainly something we can use to smack back them. Evan Nappen  10:16 Yes. Now, we want to see it go further, of course, and to finally be taken out as utterly and completely unconstitutional to even have this type of disqualifier in the gun laws. But what has been accomplished here, with the Polatov case, is incorporating the federal wins in gun law, the federal case law into state law, and establishing a more narrowing. It narrows more the “public health, safety, or welfare” disqualifier than we had prior to the law being changed. Robert Bell  11:04 Oh, yes, because now it has to focus on the applicant. People used to get denied permits for individuals who live in their house with them. If they were a convicted felon, if they were under a restraining order, if they had been involuntarily committed, something like that. Evan Nappen  11:18 Right! And that is a classic that we see going on all the time in New Jersey with an innocent third party. They attempt to disarm the innocent third party because of some other party in the household who is otherwise disqualified. Teddy Nappen  11:37 Didn’t they just pass that law, too? Where they’re now, like doing what are they trying to know like now hold or the household background check? Evan Nappen  11:45 What I’m talking about here, and I think Rob knows. When we enter into these cases where it’s an innocent third party who’s being denied their gun rights or have had their guns seized because, say, somebody else in the household gets a restraining order against them. Robert Bell  12:04 Correct. Vicarious, vicarious disability, I guess you could call it. Evan Nappen  12:08 Right! And then they abuse the case where a person said, oh yeah, I’ve let the disqualified person have the gun, you know? And suddenly that makes everybody in a household is disqualified. And so, this is going to help to end that practice, and help end those arguments of becoming disenfranchised of your gun rights because somebody else in your household is disqualified. Because it doesn’t make you, the individual, have a character or temperament problem. Robert Bell  12:47 Correct! And it doesn’t even sound like the legislature knew that what they were doing there. They just had a temper tantrum, and they limited something that they liked to use Evan Nappen  12:57 Oh, yeah! Absolutely. Teddy Nappen  12:58 Rob, I just have a question regarding, I was reading through the case, just the background of like, what they were highlighting, where it was the they thought he “lied” about it. But I just didn’t understand about his history, the criminal history of the charge, of why they were denying him. It just seemed like it was a complete misunderstanding of the question when they were asking. Did he have, like, the history? Because I was reading through the transcript that was in the decision, and it just seemed like they were confused, like it just seemed. Robert Bell  13:29 Yes, at least in that first hearing, that I did not represent him in. It seems that way. It just seems like he said, whatever. And also I don’t, I don’t know that it’s in the transcript, but that was on Zoom. That was. Teddy Nappen  13:44 Oh, even better. Robert Bell  13:45 Yeah, so that hearing was on Zoom. Evan Nappen  13:47 And wasn’t both licensing hearings in front of the same Bergen County judge? Robert Bell  13:54 And that was a beautiful point. I like to tap myself on the back for that. I said the same judge and the cops have gotten in the way of this man arming himself for five years. Evan Nappen  14:05 And I would like to point out to folks, if they want to actually read this decision, we’re going to have the link. (https://www.njcourts.gov/system/files/court-opinions/2026/a3720-23.pdf) There’s a transcription of the colloquy of the first hearing between the judge and the client. I think it illustrates what goes on in that court. Because when you read that, keep in mind the questioning you see going on there isn’t being done by the prosecutor. It’s being done by the Court, who is aggressively interrogating the applicant. Read it for yourself. You can see what goes on in that court when it comes to a Judge, who you want to be a neutral judicial authority, but he takes on the role of a cross examiner. It’s very interesting. It gives you a taste of what goes on there and what our client went through. You read it for yourself, folks. Robert Bell  15:11 Twice. Teddy Nappen  15:11 Now, multiply that times 1000 and that’s almost every gun case for New Jersey. Where you know it’s a prosecutor, a judge who you know, a political appointee who has a bias and wants to take away our rights. Evan Nappen  15:25 Well, we don’t know. Why? Why else? What is going on? Maybe, maybe not. I don’t know. Is it just simply pursuing an agenda? Is it simply a rule that is now become something where the issuing authority is, is in  prepositioned here to be aggressively questioning on the side of the Government of taking rights and not the role of protecting rights, of expanding rights, of being the one who ensures the protection of individual rights, but rather the one pushing hard on whether to take rights! That’s what you can you can argue and reflect upon. Teddy Nappen  16:13 Well, I think it comes back to just look at the Bruen decision with the dissent from Jackson. What was her view of our rights? When you consider the Second Amendment, you have to consider the issues of gun violence and threats to the community and everything else, but not actually looking at the law. That is the mindset of these people. They always bring in that bias, every single time. You see it from reading that transcript. Evan Nappen  16:40 From Jackson and see. You know, these are what when we talk about individual rights, they’re supposed to be a guarantee of our individual rights, and that guarantee is not voided by way of all these other political arguments. Okay? That’s not how it’s supposed to work. Teddy Nappen  17:03 You also have the, I always think of the line from “The Untouchables”, you know, where the guy says, “let’s do some good”. Like, that’s the mindset. They think like this. Oh, man, you’re doing such a service in denying this, this poor guy who literally is, like, what was he? He was Russian born and was in the Polish military. Robert Bell  17:23 And he knew how to handle a firearm. Teddy Nappen  17:25 Knew how to handle a firearm. Did all this history. Comes here and gets a full degree, family, everything. And he gets denied because “I don’t like guns”. Well, it’s disgusting. Evan Nappen  17:36 It’s a constant battle that we undergo. And speaking of that battle, one of the key fighters for our rights is the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs. They are the state gun rights group. They are the umbrella organization for the NRA. They’re multiple gun clubs that all belong in the Association. They have a full-time paid lobbyist down in Trenton keep an eye on the shenanigans going on there. Plus they’re fighting in the courts. I mean, Koons versus Platkin. Guess what? Association is on that case. And these are the important things that are this great organization is doing. You need to be a member of anjrpc.org That’s the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs. Make sure you join. Make sure you’re part of the solution. Evan Nappen  18:32 I also want to talk about our really good friends at WeShoot. WeShoot is a range in Lakewood. We’ve all shot. Rob, you’ve shot at WeShoot as well. Robert Bell  18:43 Correct you are. Evan Nappen  18:43 And so has Teddy. Yep. And we love WeShoot. That is the range. it is right there in Lakewood, conveniently off the Parkway. You can have access to a fantastic resource for being able to shoot right there. They have great training and a great pro shop. That’s where we got our CCARE certificates for getting our carries, and you can get yours there as well. And get all kinds of training – both advanced and novice. Make sure that you check out WeShoot and the WeShoot website, which is at weshootusa.com. You can see the famous WeShoot photography and the WeShoot girls. They have a lot of fantastic deals on firearms that they’re running. You’ll love it. Everyone loves WeShoot. Go there and have a great day at the range. Evan Nappen  19:43 And let me also take a moment to shamelessly promote my book, which is New Jersey Gun Law. It is the Bible of Jersey gun law. It’s a book used by, well, everybody that wants to know about New Jersey gun law. You need to get your copy. Go to EvanNappen.com and order a copy today. It will help you get through the matrix of insanity called New Jersey gun laws and hopefully not become a GOFU, which is always a challenge in the Democratic People’s Republic of New Jersey. So, Teddy, what do you have today for us in Press Checks? Teddy Nappen  20:23 Well, as you know, Press Checks are always free, and I always make it a point. And everyone who has been listening on the show knows I always want to do opposition research. What are they talking about? What is the argument? And you know, our good friends at The Trace. They always keep us abreast on whatever, you know, with their little message and propaganda. And there’s been this huge push where they’re trying to, like, you know, push Trump out and say, oh, he’s anti-gun. He’s hurting gun owners. They always try to make this argument that he’s anti-gun. They go on this Trump deranged rant, but they’re an anti-gun outlet. So, they would be praising Trump for this, but they still go after him. It’s very confusing. And it’s just the, it’s because whenever it comes, Evan Nappen  21:11 They’re schizophrenic, man! Teddy Nappen  21:12 Well, no, it’s the issue of the fact, you always have to remember these people are Marxists. And when it comes to Marxists, it doesn’t matter about standards or beliefs. It’s about defeating the opposition. They don’t care what position they have to take, so long as they defeat their opponent. That’s how you end up with, you know, where you end up with crazies. Where they have, like, the groups of the Left trying to join, you know, “Free Maduro” and “Free Iran”. Like, that level of insanity. So, their latest article from this guy by the name of Champe Barton. I don’t care. “Trump’s Tariffs Are Driving Up Ammo Prices”. (https://www.thetrace.org/2026/03/trump-tariffs-ammunition-prices/) This is something they’ve been pushing for for the longest time. Evan Nappen  22:01 So, they should be totally in favor of tariffs then, because it helps promote their anti-gun agenda, right? Teddy Nappen  22:08 Oh, that would be the argument, but they’re like. Iinstead, it’s just this whole the pro-gun President is hurting gun owners. And they go on this whole stupid thing, like pro-gun President squeezing the ammo industry. Gun owners, bullets, all the humanity, like it’s the level of like they try like the turbulence has arrived. Trump has billed himself the most pro-gun president ever. Yet steeping tariffs in metals and chemicals used to make ammunition is ratcheting up the prices and costs for ammunition. And according to the Ammunition Depot, the average daily price of nine millimeter full jacket, as widely used by the caliber of the market, has ticked up steadily. In January, it’s twice topped 35 cents, the highest level since 2023. About 10 cents more than the average price during 2025. So, I love the game. They always like try to quote, oh, this is a respective source. So you know what? I actually went to the Ammo Depot. I actually went to their sources. And let’s give a little history. So, in December 2020, full metal jacket was of Evan Nappen  23:28 Nine millimeter, full metal jacket? Teddy Nappen  23:30 Full Metal Jacket, 1000 rounds was about 180 prior to 2020. Then it jumped to like 600 to 700 dollars per you know, per 1000. You remember that 2020 days? Evan Nappen  23:34 I remember. Teddy Nappen  23:44 Those golden bricks. They were selling. Evan Nappen  23:46 Crazy prices. Robert Bell  23:47 Gaslighting. Teddy Nappen  23:48 Yeah, oh, yeah. And then cut to February 2021, and the prices was like 70 cents, a round, 90 cents around. And then 2023 to 2024, things finally started to calm down once the end of Covid, where it was 20 cents and it was 27 cents. Then it was 23 cents. Just hovering around that number. And then 2025 it’s at around 21 cents to 24 cents. And of November, 2025 it dropped to 20 cents. I went to the prices index. Went right to the index, it hovers around 12 cents per round to 30 cents per round. So, what the heck are they talking about? This whole stupidity of an argument which, by the way, the experts are still trying to figure out, where’s all this inflation? I mean, we’ve been saying tariffs are inflationary, but none of the inflation has hit. Evan Nappen  24:42 That’s because a lot of the manufacturing has just absorbed it in a cost-of-doing business, and competition has made it so it did not skyrocket. Teddy Nappen  24:51 Yeah. Also, we are the largest producer of lead ore. We exported 864 million of ore. Know how much we imported? Evan Nappen  25:01 Ooooh, and a lot of that lead comes out of the front of a barrel of a little gun, right? Teddy Nappen  25:07 I know, right? Evan Nappen  25:08 Exporting it all around. It’s great. Teddy Nappen  25:08 I know. We, you know, it’s good. You know what? We should export more to Iran. Evan Nappen  25:15 We are really exporting a lot of lead to Iran. Teddy Nappen  25:20 I know, right? But then I even pulled up. I always do this. I like citing Left-leaning sources to prove they’re against their argument. MSN, they brought on expert. You have to understand. Step one, tariffs on imports do raise the price on imports, but you have to remember U.S. experts earn the withdrawal by buying imports from other countries. So, if you have a tax on imports, it’s exactly the same on a tax of exports. That’s called linear symmetry theorem, exactly the same. And therefore what happens is, all the exported goods and services, their prices will fall. So, the increase of price imports is matched by the fall of price. So, it comes down to net zero. That’s their whole argument. That’s their whole long winded claim of like this is the reason. Instead of just admitting tariffs are non-inflationary and just accepting that reality. Because if you look to the price all the time. Evan Nappen  26:16 Let’s step back and look how they’re trying to twist that into somehow Trump is hurting the Second Amendment, or something. Like, first of all, they would be rejoicing if, in fact, he was hurting it. So, why are they putting it out that it’s in any way a problem? Instead they’re trying to just convince what? A MAGA base of some sort that he’s betraying them or something. The politics of that is just bizarro for The Trace, otherwise they should just praise it. In other words, they’re in favor of it. Teddy Nappen  26:49 Dad. Evan Nappen  26:49 What? Teddy Nappen  26:49 Well, this is the trick. Cut to the Germans in World War Two. You’re already lost. Your allies have abandoned you. You are losing men and materials. Your tariffs are causing inflation. Evan Nappen  27:03 Right! Exactly. Teddy Nappen  27:04 This is their game, where they’re trying to break up MAGA in that idea. Evan Nappen  27:08 Right! Teddy Nappen  27:10 Whereas that’s why you have all the black pillars, you have all these stupid people trying to make propaganda, yeah, and that’s the truth, and that’s why you push all these lies. And, you know. Just cut to Harry Entonces, the golden retriever of CNN – MAGA support, 100% on the GOP. Evan Nappen  27:30 Yeah, 100! Teddy Nappen  27:32 That’s, I thought like, he’s making that up. There’s no way. But it’s CNN, like they already undervalue it. So, at this point it’d be 110% for Trump, because it’s that level of. Evan Nappen  27:43 Right! Teddy Nappen  27:43 It’s so stupid. So, this psyop, they try to do a breaking up Trump from the gun owners, breaking up MAGA. This is all lies. And I have the articles here from that. From the Ore World, from showing the levels of production. It’s all lies, factual inaccuracies. Evan Nappen  28:05 Well, I appreciate you pointing that out. I’m sure the listeners do as well. And Rob, what a great job and what a fight you had all through. From the trial level through the appellate level, but victory is yours! Because it is not just a win on the appeal, but it is a published case that actually establishes law for New Jersey and even brings in now the federal case law. It’s quite an accomplishment. It’s really great. Robert Bell  28:40 Thank you! Evan Nappen  28:40 And I want to want to tell you that at the end of the show, we always do the GOFU, which is the Gun Owner Fuck Up. We try to educate our folks about not making mistakes that we’ve seen others make in our practice. They’re expensive mistakes, and they can learn here for free not to do them. So this week’s GOFU, I want to ask you, Rob. Based on anything you’ve been dealing with or observing as any kind of GOFU that you’d like to let our listeners know about for this week? Robert Bell  29:18 Sure thing. But before I do, I forgot to mention that in the Polotov case, the judge and prosecutor are absolutely seething. Evan Nappen  29:26 Oh, really? Wait, what is that? Why is that? Robert Bell  29:29 Well, I very triumphantly emailed an order to the Court and ccd the prosecutor who originally was on this case. Evan Nappen  29:42 And wait, wait. An order for what? Robert Bell  29:44 Granting the permit! Evan Nappen  29:46 Well, let’s explain why. Because the Court in the appellate decision ordered, not just reversing the decision of the lower court, but ordered the issuance of the Firearms Purchaser ID Card. So, you sent the Court order to the trial court saying, here do this order, reversing denial and ordering the issuance of the of the FID card, as the appellate court has so stated, right? Robert Bell  30:16 Correct! Evan Nappen  30:17 So, you did that, right? And what happened? Robert Bell  30:19 Yes, and the Bergen County prosecutors, there were two of them on the email said, oh, please hold off on that. We need to, we need to. We need to talk about this. We need to confer to see if we’re going to appeal or file a stay. So, they’re running scared. Evan Nappen  30:37 For reconsideration or something? Do they actually think they could get a reconsideration of an appellate case that the Appellate Division chose to make published? Robert Bell  30:49 Let’em try. Teddy Nappen  30:50 When it comes. Evan Nappen  30:51 Oh, boy. Teddy Nappen  30:52 When it comes to guns, they’ll always make an exception for us. Evan Nappen  30:57 Well, I don’t know why, but they’re taking it, they’re not taking it very well, huh? From what you’re saying. Robert Bell  31:05 I would say that what they’re doing may be a GTFU – a Gun Tyrant Fuck Up. Which brings us to the GOFU. Evan Nappen  31:15 Well, that does. And wait one second. You know anybody who’s had their firearm license, FID Card denied, this may now present the opportunity to go back. And if you were denied and if it wasn’t based on a criteria that would now fit in the violence area, right? If it was “public health, safety, or welfare” denial of old that this opens a door for you to at least put in for re-application or give a call to us or your other attorneys and see maybe we can do something about reviewing the denial that should not have occurred. So, it opens the door to that for that. Robert Bell  32:08 They have the right not have a denial on their record if it was erroneous the first time around. Evan Nappen  32:13 Right! So, this opens that door. But go ahead, what’s the GOFU, Rob? What is your GOFU? Robert Bell  32:19 I have encountered it multiple times – voluntary registration of an inherited firearm. And I just don’t understand why someone would do that. I hope no one out there does do it. But in New Jersey, for example, if you inherit a firearm from a loved one, a parent, what have you, you do not have to go through the rigmarole of getting a purchase permit. It simply comes to you. However, there is voluntary registration in the Democratic People’s Republic of New Jersey. You can go to their website and voluntarily give them the information – serial number, the make and model. I don’t know. That’s like talking to cops. And with that, I’m like, I’m good. I’m good. Evan Nappen  33:01 Yeah, I don’t know why anybody would voluntarily register. The first word is voluntary, which means you don’t have to do it. So, you don’t. There’s no reason to voluntarily register your firearm. I’ve yet to find the reason that makes it a good idea. Haven’t seen it. Now, if someone can tell me that reason, that’d be nice to know. But I don’t see it. And instead, all you’re doing is putting yourself on the radar when there’s no reason to do it. Then people that do voluntarily register, then raise the State and looking into them. So, now you’re simply saying, hey, look at me, check out the reason for registration, and what I’m writing and everything else about it. And so, all you’re doing is waving a big flag at the Government to focus on you as well. It’s completely unnecessary. Absolutely a classic GOFU is anybody stupid enough to voluntarily register one of their guns. Evan Nappen  34:12 This is Evan Nappen, Teddy Nappen, and Robert Bell, reminding you that gun laws don’t protect honest citizens from criminals. They protect criminals from honest citizens. Speaker 2  34:27 Gun Lawyer is a Counterthink Media production. The music used in this broadcast was managed by Cosmo Music, New York, New York. Reach us by emailing Evan@gun.lawyer. The information and opinions in this broadcast do not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney in your state. Downloadable PDF TranscriptGun Lawyer S5 E282_Transcript About The HostEvan Nappen, Esq.Known as “America's Gun Lawyer,” Evan Nappen is above all a tireless defender of justice. Author of eight bestselling books and countless articles on firearms, knives, and weapons history and the law, a certified Firearms Instructor, and avid weapons collector and historian with a vast collection that spans almost five decades — it's no wonder he's become the trusted, go-to expert for local, industry and national media outlets. Regularly called on by radio, television and online news media for his commentary and expertise on breaking news Evan has appeared countless shows including Fox News – Judge Jeanine, CNN – Lou Dobbs, Court TV, Real Talk on WOR, It's Your Call with Lyn Doyle, Tom Gresham's Gun Talk, and Cam & Company/NRA News. As a creative arts consultant, he also lends his weapons law and historical expertise to an elite, discerning cadre of movie and television producers and directors, and novelists. He also provides expert testimony and consultations for defense attorneys across America. Email Evan Your Comments and Questions  talkback@gun.lawyer Join Evan's InnerCircleHere's your chance to join an elite group of the Savviest gun and knife owners in America.  Membership is totally FREE and Strictly CONFIDENTIAL.  Just enter your email to start receiving insider news, tips, and other valuable membership benefits.   Email (required) *First Name *Select list(s) to subscribe toInnerCircle Membership Yes, I would like to receive emails from Gun Lawyer Podcast. (You can unsubscribe anytime)Constant Contact Use. Please leave this field blank.var ajaxurl = "https://gun.lawyer/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php";

Fiona and Macca are joined live in the studio by Katherine Copsey, Greens, MLC for Southern Metro, Katherine Copsey, is an Australian politician and lawyer currently serving as a member of the Victorian Legislative Council for the Australian Greens Victoria, representing the Southern Metropolitan Region. Elected in the 2022 Victorian state election, she assumed office on 26 November 2022. Since February 2023, Copsey has held several leadership roles for the Victorian Greens, including Deputy Party Room Chair and spokesperson for Justice, Gambling Harm Reduction, Animal Protection, and Major Events. As of February 2025, she serves as the spokesperson for Public Transport and Roads. Copsey's legislative priorities centre on environmental and social justice, advocating for renewable energy, increased affordable housing, improved public transport, and community-focused urban planning. The post Sat, 21st, Feb, 2026: Katherine Copsey, Greens, MLC for Southern Metro, Passing of the Vicarious Liability Bill appeared first on Saturday Magazine.

Macca is back in the hosting seat and Jack’s back behind the panel and our very special guest host is Fiona Patten. Our first guest for this week is Cameron Doig, from the Law Firm, Arnold, Thomas and Becker, dissecting the news on the vicarious liability laws in Victoria. Cameron is a skilled and tested solicitor who has secured over 60 settlements for survivors of child sexual abuse and recovered over $40 million in total damages for his clients. He has secured settlements in excess of $1 million in a number of individual cases. He regularly brings claims for survivors of child abuse against government, religious, charitable, and sporting institutions as well as public and private schools. He is a clear communicator who enjoys making the legal system easy to understand for clients, walking them through the process, and explaining what they can expect. He is a practical and proactive litigator whose familiarity with the court process helps him level the playing field between vulnerable survivors and powerful institutions. Cameron's experience includes: • Settling 12 claims against the Victorian Government's Department of Education for victims of abuse by teacher Peter Sutton, including one claim for over $1.4 million; • Securing a $550,000 settlement against two Catholic religious orders for abuse of a former school student; and • Securing a $500,000 settlement for a man abused in Bayswater Boys Home and Turana. He has appeared in print and TV media discussing his clients' cases and issues confronting abuse survivors. He has volunteered at the Refugee Legal Night Service since August 2023. “Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine holding a party (often an employer) responsible for the wrongful acts or omissions of another (usually an employee) committed during the course of employment, even if the superior is not directly at fault. It is a form of strict liability, commonly applied in workplace discrimination, harassment, or negligence cases” https://humanrights.gov.au/resource-hub/by-resource-type/publications/sex-and-gender-rights/vicarious-liability If this story has affected you in any way please go to the Joy Support page to find support: https://joy.org.au/support/ The post Sat, 21st, Feb, 2026: Cameron Doig, Arnold, Thomas and Becker: Explaining the changes to legislation for Vicarious Liability in Victoria appeared first on Saturday Magazine.

We look squarely at the invisible load of caring for people with Long Covid and ME/CFS, why carers' nervous systems shape recovery, and how boundaries and communication protect both sides. We share clear, humane steps that reduce burnout and build co‑regulation at home.• Defining the carer role across partners, parents and adult children• Why caring is invisible, isolating and exhausting• Boundaries that prevent “fixing” and conflict• Fluctuating illness, hypervigilance and control• Co‑regulation and why a calm carer accelerates recovery• Practical resets that aren't a self‑care to‑do list• Sharing the care, advocacy and admin load• Vicarious trauma in carers and how to spot it• Simple communication that honours both sets of needs• Giving and receiving grace while recovery unfoldsLinks: Connect with Nadyne: https://nadynemckie.co.uk/how-I-can-help-you Our previous episodes: "Embracing Kindness" https://www.buzzsprout.com/1835170/episodes/15968082"Empowering through Compassion & Play" https://www.buzzsprout.com/1835170/episodes/16104655Message the podcast! - questions will be answered on my youtube channel :) For more information about Long Covid Breathing courses & workshops, please check out LongCovidBreathing.com (music credit - Brock Hewitt, Rule of Life) Support the show~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~The Long Covid Podcast is self-produced & self funded. If you enjoy what you hear and are able to, please Buy me a coffee or purchase a mug to help cover costsTranscripts available on individual episodes herewww.LongCovidPodcast.comFacebook Instagram Twitter Facebook Creativity GroupSubscribe to mailing listI love to hear from you, via socials or LongCovidPodcast@gmail.com**Disclaimer - you should not rely on any medical information contained in this Podcast and related materials in making medical, health-related or other decisions. Please consult a doctor or other health professional**

As usual on nights I can't sleep I turned on the TV and into the most amazing series on a woman's children who are kidnapped by the father and the tension that ensues. It made me think about what a family is, how that defines us, the societal rules around it, and what role domestic violence leaves people.  Key Takeaways:    [0:49] The show: No One Saw Us Leave is amazing! [2:30] The patriarchy in this really struck a chord with me [5:18] Vicarious violence and second order violence  [7:26] Equality is not the same thing as equity  [10:10] The nuclear family and societal rules  [14:01] How this show connects to my job loss and upbringing  [18:09] How far should family loyalty go? [19:46] What's disrupting families [23:25] What does family mean to you?   Resources:   No One Saw Us Leave Connect with Barb:   Website   Facebook    Instagram   Be a guest on the podcast    YouTube   The Molly B Foundation  

Send a textRaise your hand if the last couple of weeks have felt… heavy.Not just busy. Not just frustrating.Heavy.As more information comes out about the Epstein files and the physicians connected to them, many of us are noticing something uncomfortable stirring beneath the surface. And today, we're naming it.Vicarious shame.Not guilt. Not embarrassment. Not even anger—though that may be there too.Shame.And here's the important distinction:Guilt says: I did something bad.Shame says: I am bad.Vicarious shame is when we feel shame on behalf of someone else and their actions.You haven't done anything wrong.And yet you may feel the weight of it.Because we are physicians.Because we identify deeply with our profession.Because we carry responsibility seriously.Because we are highly empathic women who have been socialized to hold things together.And medicine? Medicine has trained us in shame.We trained in environments where missteps equaled inadequacy.Where not knowing something meant being exposed.Where performance and worth blurred into one.So when we see male physicians—powerful, wealthy, prominent—implicated in abuses of power, something hits close to home. Not because we are like them. But because we share the title.And if you've noticed:A heaviness in your chestA compulsive urge to scroll and read moreA sense of disgust that somehow turns inwardA quiet questioning of the professionYou are not alone.But here is what we will not do:We will not carry their shame.They deserve to experience shame for their actions. Shame is an appropriate human response to wrongdoing. If they do not feel it, that is their pathology—not your burden.We do not atone for abuses we did not commit.We do not hold shame for the profession.We do not absorb the moral weight of other people's misconduct.What do we do instead?1️⃣ We name it.Naming vicarious shame immediately loosens its grip. When you say, “Oh. That's what this is,” your nervous system settles.2️⃣ We speak it.Shame thrives in silence. When we talk about what we're feeling—with trusted colleagues, friends, or within supportive spaces—we metabolize it.3️⃣ We give it back.There are practices for this. Writing a letter and burning it. Speaking aloud that you are releasing what isn't yours. Sitting in witness with another human and choosing to let it go.You are allowed to release shame that does not belong to you.4️⃣ We practice critical awareness.You may notice how quickly you internalize responsibility. How readily you identify with the profession. How often you hustle to represent medicine “well.”You are not the bad actor.You provide care.You carry responsibility with integrity.You have not abused your privilege.We will not confuse ourselves with them.This is heavy work. But it is human work. And it is especially Support the showTo learn more about my coaching practice and group offerings, head over to www.healthierforgood.com. I help Physicians and Allied Health Professional women to let go of toxic perfectionist and people-pleasing habits that leave them frustrated and exhausted. If you are ready to learn skills that help you set boundaries and prioritize yourself, without becoming a cynical a-hole, come work with me.Want to contact me directly?Email: megan@healthierforgood.comFollow me on Instagram!@MeganMeloMD

Navigating the Complexities of Partnership Law: A Deep DiveThis conversation delves into the complexities of agency and partnership law, focusing on the implications of personal liability for partners, the processes of dissociation and dissolution, and the importance of understanding these concepts for legal exams. The discussion highlights the tension between the entity and aggregate views of partnerships, the rules governing authority and liability, and practical strategies for navigating partnership law effectively.In the world of business, partnerships can be both a boon and a bane. Our latest podcast episode delves into the intricate world of partnership law, shedding light on the risks and responsibilities that partners face. From understanding the entity and aggregate views of partnerships to navigating the procedural nuances of dissociation and dissolution, this episode is a must-listen for anyone involved in or considering a partnership.Understanding Liability and DissolutionOne of the key takeaways from our discussion is the concept of joint and several liability. This principle means that each partner is individually responsible for the entire debt of the partnership, a sobering thought for many. We also explore the dissolution process, emphasizing the importance of a well-drafted partnership agreement to mitigate potential conflicts and ensure a smooth transition when partners decide to part ways.The Role of a Partnership AgreementA partnership agreement is not just a formality; it's a critical tool that outlines the rights and responsibilities of each partner. It serves as a roadmap for resolving disputes and provides a framework for the dissolution process. Our episode highlights the need for clarity and precision in these agreements to protect all parties involved.Partnerships offer unique opportunities for collaboration and growth, but they also come with significant risks. By understanding the legal landscape and preparing accordingly, partners can navigate these challenges effectively. Tune in to our podcast for a comprehensive guide to partnership law and learn how to protect your interests in a partnership.Subscribe NowStay informed and empowered by subscribing to our podcast. Don't miss out on future episodes that delve into the legal intricacies of business and beyond.TakeawaysPartnership law creates personal liability for partners.The fundamental question in partnerships is who pays the bills.RUPA introduces significant changes to partnership liability.Authority in partnerships can bind the entire firm.Vicarious liability holds partnerships accountable for partners' actions.Dissociation does not always lead to dissolution of the partnership.The winding up process is critical for closing a partnership.Understanding the difference between joint and several liability is essential.Exam strategies include recognizing common traps and errors.A well-drafted partnership agreement is crucial for managing risks.agency, partnership, liability, contracts, torts, dissociation, dissolution, RUPA, legal education, law exams

Jenny Hughes is a psychologist specializing in trauma. She discusses the concepts of vicarious trauma and resilience, sharing her career journey and the founding of the Brave Trauma Therapist Collective. The conversation delves into the importance of recognizing vicarious trauma, the development of the BRAVE method, and practical strategies for mental health professionals and the general public to navigate their emotional well-being. She emphasizes the significance of community support and the need to identify and celebrate small moments of joy, referred to as 'glimmers', in challenging times.Key Takeaways:Vicarious trauma is a normal experience for helpers.The BRAVE method helps address vicarious trauma.Naming vicarious trauma is the first step to managing it.Vicarious resilience can be accessed through empathic engagement.Community support is crucial for mental health professionals.Glimmers of hope can be found in everyday moments.Self-care is essential but should be part of a larger structural change.The journey of healing is not linear and requires patience.Jenny's Links:WebsiteFacehttps://www.facebook.com/groups/thebravevicarioustraumacommunitybookInstagramYouTube

It's a vicariousness that we attain, a vicarious experience where we become wise by hearing. Anecdote—when we were reading the Fourth Canto at Govardhan, I remember there was a brahmacārī there—he was at a crossroads or something. I heard him as I was walking in one of the breaks; he was talking to his spiritual master, and he goes, "What was I thinking?" Because he had just heard the Bhāgavatam, suddenly he exclaimed, 'What was I thinking?' In other words, Bhagavān had wrested him out of his stupor, where he had begun contemplating the material world again and suddenly, by the vicarious experience of hearing the Fourth Canto, he thought, 'Ooh, that was close. I almost got re-consumed.' So, it has that power for us to vicariously experience the cycle that takes place—the inevitable cycle. It's so predictable; it's such an old story, but nobody can get out of it because they don't have information outside the closed universe. 'Tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo'—it's outside that normal creation. The material world is so predictable, down to the psychic movements that take place within the mind of a conditioned soul. ------------------------------------------------------------ To connect with His Grace Vaiśeṣika Dāsa, please visit https://www.fanthespark.com/next-steps/ask-vaisesika-dasa/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=launch2025 ------------------------------------------------------------ Add to your wisdom literature collection: https://iskconsv.com/book-store/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=launch2025 https://www.bbtacademic.com/books/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=launch2025 https://thefourquestionsbook.com/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=launch2025 ------------------------------------------------------------ Join us live on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FanTheSpark/ Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sound-bhakti/id1132423868 For the latest videos, subscribe https://www.youtube.com/@FanTheSpark For the latest in SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/fan-the-spark ------------------------------------------------------------ #spiritualawakening #soul #spiritualexperience #spiritualpurposeoflife #spiritualgrowthlessons #secretsofspirituality #vaisesikaprabhu #vaisesikadasa #vaisesikaprabhulectures #spirituality #bhaktiyoga #krishna #spiritualpurposeoflife #krishnaspirituality #spiritualusachannel #whybhaktiisimportant #whyspiritualityisimportant #vaisesika #spiritualconnection #thepowerofspiritualstudy #selfrealization #spirituallectures #spiritualstudy #spiritualquestions #spiritualquestionsanswered #trendingspiritualtopics #fanthespark #spiritualpowerofmeditation #spiritualteachersonyoutube #spiritualhabits #spiritualclarity #bhagavadgita #srimadbhagavatam #spiritualbeings #kttvg #keepthetranscendentalvibrationgoing #spiritualpurpose

P.M. Raymond joins The Dark Mind Podcast to discuss her debut collection Things Are As They Should Be and Other Words To Die For.This New Orleans-inspired noir-horror exploration examines revenge, consequence, and the violence that seeps into the soil of communities.Raymond discusses blending crime noir's moral agency with psychological horror's supernatural consequences.We explore the distinction between Voodoo as a monotheistic religion and Hoodoo as magical practice.Raymond explains how New Orleans functions as a character with its own permissive moral weight.The conversation covers her Eleanor Taylor Bland Award-winning story A Nasty Business and the generational trauma embedded in Southern families.We discuss The Entitled Life and Untimely Death of King Booker, set in 1960s segregated New Orleans.Raymond shares her creative process of annual experimentation with different formats including screenplays, second-person POV, and writing in French.She explains her commitment to refusing editorial requests to sanitize cultural content or over-explain New Orleans-specific references.The episode examines how silence functions as both weapon and resistance in her interconnected stories.Raymond discusses the promise and inevitable failure of revenge as vicarious catharsis for readers.We explore Southern Gothic's treatment of home as trap rather than refuge.The conversation touches on her IT project management background and how analytical thinking shapes her chaotic emotional narratives.Raymond reflects on her uncle George Raymond's civil rights work and the research behind her historical fiction.This episode offers insight into crafting morally ambiguous characters, genre hybridity, and grounded escalation in dark fiction.Official WebsiteP.M. Raymond – Official Sitehttps://www.pmraymond.com​Email / ContactWebsite contact pagehttps://www.pmraymond.com/contact-us​Newsletter / BlogSubstack – “The Raymond Experience”https://pmraymond.substack.com​Blog via main websitehttps://www.pmraymond.com/blog​Social MediaInstagram – P.M. Raymond (@pmraymond_author)https://www.instagram.com/pmraymond_author/​Facebook – P.M. Raymond Author Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/pmraymondauthor/​PublisherUncomfortably Dark Horror – Author Pagehttps://www.uncomfortablydark.com/ourauthors​Goodreads / Reader PlatformsGoodreads – P.M. Raymond Author Pagehttps://www.goodreads.com/author/show/39871595.P_M_Raymond​Amazonhttps://www.amazon.com/stores/P.M.-Raymond/author/B0BT8V74J3?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1&qid=1768792762&sr=8-1&shoppingPortalEnabled=true&ccs_id=af5cbe7a-dddd-412f-a13e-7cfa6d614597​Barnes & NobleBarnes & Noble – Search results for P.M. Raymondhttps://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/%22P.M.%20Raymond%22Barnes & Noble – Search results for “Things Are As They Should Be and other words to die for”https://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/%22Things%20Are%20As%20They%20Should%20Be%20and%20other%20words%20to%20die%20for%22​Anthologies / Other Work (Selected Purchase Paths via Publishers/Retailers)Uncomfortably Dark – Main site (for news on the collection and other titles)https://www.uncomfortablydark.com​Level Best Books – The Most Dangerous Games (anthology including P.M. Raymond)https://www.levelbestbooks.usDown & Out Books – Rock, Roll, and Ruin (anthology including P.M. Raymond)https://downandoutbooks.com​Support The Dark Mind PodcastPatreon – Support The Dark Mind Podcasthttps://www.patreon.com/c/thedarkmindpodcast

With the events of the past week such as the capturing of Venezuela's President Maduro to ICE murdering United States citizens, the news has been heavy to start off 2026. How do we social workers deal with all of this trauma we see on a daily basis? How do we center ourselves to be there for our clients? I share a hot take and a call to action for social workers in the field.The podcast is sponsored by Bas Moreno Consulting, providing financial education for people of color in the sandwich generation who are struggling with their finances while caregiving. For more information go to Basmorenoconsulting.net.Follow the podcast on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/thesocialworkrantspodcast#trump #vicarioustrauma #mentalhealth #socialwork

The Evolution of Tort Law: From Contributory Negligence to Comparative JusticeThis conversation delves into the complexities of tort law, focusing on the evolution of defenses and liabilities. It begins with an overview of torts, emphasizing the importance of understanding defenses in legal education. The discussion transitions from historical concepts like contributory negligence to modern approaches such as comparative negligence, highlighting key doctrines like assumption of risk and various immunities. The conversation also covers vicarious liability and joint and several liability, providing a comprehensive framework for analyzing tort cases.In the realm of tort law, the journey from rigid, all-or-nothing rules to more nuanced standards of justice is a fascinating one. Historically, the doctrine of contributory negligence was unforgiving. Imagine being 1% at fault in an accident and receiving nothing in damages because of it. This harsh rule left many plaintiffs without recourse, prompting a shift towards fairness.The introduction of comparative negligence marked a pivotal change. This system allows for damages to be apportioned based on the relative fault of each party, ensuring that even those partially at fault can receive compensation. The transition wasn't swift; it evolved over decades, influenced by landmark cases and legislative changes.One of the most illustrative cases is Butterfield v. Forrester, where the court's decision highlighted the severe implications of contributory negligence. However, the doctrine of last clear chance emerged as a counterbalance, allowing plaintiffs to recover if the defendant had the final opportunity to avoid the harm.Today, the majority of jurisdictions have adopted some form of comparative negligence, with variations like the 50% and 49% rules, which determine the threshold for recovery. This evolution reflects a broader trend in the legal system towards balancing fairness with the need for clear, predictable rules.As we continue to navigate these legal waters, the challenge remains: how do we ensure justice while maintaining the integrity of the legal system? This question is at the heart of tort law's ongoing evolution.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest in legal education and insights.TakeawaysThe entire ball game often hinges on surviving the defenses.Contributory negligence operated as a complete bar to recovery.The last clear chance doctrine allows recovery despite plaintiff's negligence.Comparative negligence apportions damages based on relative fault.Immunities are shields that protect certain defendants from liability.Vicarious liability holds employers responsible for employees' actions.Joint and several liability allows plaintiffs to recover full damages from any defendant.The discretionary function exception protects government actions from liability.Assumption of risk can be primary or secondary, affecting recovery.The evolution of tort law reflects a shift towards more flexible standards.torts, contributory negligence, comparative negligence, assumption of risk, sovereign immunity, vicarious liability, tort law defenses, legal education, law students, liability

There are a bunch of stories that testify that those on the other side of the veil are being taught and ministered to and seeking repentance.  It's our privilege to be a part of that great work!If you'd like to view the video that goes with the podcast, click here!

Vicarious work

Michael Assraf is building Flamingo, an open-source and AI-powered operating system for managed service providers. After exiting Vicarious in May 2024, he spent seven months on market research before writing a single line of code—conducting 15+ MSP interviews, mapping their complete tool stack economics, and testing distribution channels with a free community product. The research revealed a structural margin crisis: MSPs operate on 10-15% margins with 30% of revenue flowing to vendor payouts and 25-30% to technician labor. Meanwhile, private equity consolidation drives customer pricing down while legacy vendors raise prices. Michael closed a $2.2 million pre-seed in February 2025, built OpenMSP as a lead-gen vehicle that generated 1,000+ waitlist signups, and launched Open Frame with 70% of capital still in the bank. In this launch-day conversation, he breaks down why the $380 billion MSP market remains massively underinvested, how Facebook ads outperformed LinkedIn 5:1, and why he's giving away the core product while charging for hosted deployment. Topics Discussed: The seven-month research phase: 15+ MSP interviews, mapping 19 tool categories with pricing data, evaluating open source project maturity through commit frequency and VC backing MSP margin compression mechanics: 30% vendor payouts, 25-30% labor costs, 10-15% net margins being crushed by PE-driven consolidation and vendor price increases Building OpenMSP as distribution validation: four months before alpha, generated 1,000 waitlist signups and 200 Slack members while testing paid acquisition channels Why Facebook delivered 40%+ of leads at $6-8 CPL while outbound completely failed with IT-busy MSPs aged 25-50 in central US markets Launching with 70% of $2.2M pre-seed still in bank by solving for distribution and product-market fit before scaling headcount Open Frame's architecture: unified control plane over open source tools (RMM, SSO, zero trust) with dual AI agents—one for end users, one for technicians Offering both self-hosted (free, GitHub) and commercial SaaS (per-seat pricing starting January 2026) to build trust in an underserved market The MSP category opportunity: $380B market, 12% annual growth, 30-40K US MSPs, minimal VC-backed innovation against 20-year-old incumbents GTM Lessons For B2B Founders: Build lead-gen infrastructure before you have a product to sell: Four months before launching Open Frame, Michael shipped OpenMSP—a free tool that analyzes MSP tech stacks and suggests open source replacements. It wasn't a waitlist landing page; it delivered standalone value while capturing intent data. This generated 1,000 qualified signups and 200 Slack community members while simultaneously validating paid acquisition channels. By launch, he knew Facebook cost $6-8 per lead while outbound failed completely. Most founders build product first, then scramble for distribution. Michael inverted the sequence. Fire fast on sales hires in early stage, or don't hire them at all: Michael fired three VP Sales at Vicarious before learning the lesson: "The moment to bring salespeople is not when you are able to sell your product, is when someone else is able to sell your product." The critical test isn't whether the founder can close deals—founders sell vision and relationship. The test is whether a marketing person, SDR, or non-sales hire can generate revenue. Only then do salespeople accelerate an already-working motion. Hiring VP Sales at $50K ARR because the board wants "someone to own revenue" burns 12+ months and $200K+ learning this. Spend 6-12 months researching before building in unfamiliar markets: Michael conducted 15+ MSP interviews, mapped all 19 tool categories they use with pricing, evaluated open source alternatives by analyzing GitHub commit frequency and pull requests, identified which projects had VC backing for long-term viability, and tested multiple marketing channels before alpha deployment. This allowed him to launch with product-market fit indicators already validated and 70% of his $2.2M still in the bank. The alternative—build fast, iterate with customers—works when you deeply understand the market. When you don't, research is cheaper than pivots. Target categories where lack of innovation creates adoption momentum: MSPs represent 30-40K companies in the US alone, part of a $380B global market growing 12% annually. Yet VCs historically avoided the space assuming low ACV and high churn. The dominant platforms—ConnectWise, Datto, Asea—have existed 20+ years with minimal AI adoption or architectural modernization. Michael specifically chose MSPs because "in cyber security you would never get traction that we're getting right now unless you're spending millions of dollars." In crowded categories, distribution cost kills you. In starved categories, any credible innovation gets attention. Architect your product so adoption mechanically improves customer unit economics: Open Frame attacks both sides of MSP margin compression simultaneously. The open source tool suite eliminates the 30% of revenue paid to commercial vendors. The dual AI agent system (end-user self-service + technician orchestration) reduces the 25-30% spent on labor. Michael didn't find a problem and then figure out monetization—he reverse-engineered a solution where product adoption directly expands customer margins. When your product makes customers structurally more profitable, adoption isn't a marketing problem. // Sponsors: Front Lines — We help B2B tech companies launch, manage, and grow podcasts that drive demand, awareness, and thought leadership. www.FrontLines.io The Global Talent Co. — We help tech startups find, vet, hire, pay, and retain amazing marketing talent that costs 50-70% less than the US & Europe. www.GlobalTalent.co   //   Don't Miss: New Podcast Series — How I Hire Senior GTM leaders share the tactical hiring frameworks they use to build winning revenue teams. Hosted by Andy Mowat, who scaled 4 unicorns from $10M to $100M+ ARR and launched Whispered to help executives find their next role. Subscribe here: https://open.spotify.com/show/53yCHlPfLSMFimtv0riPyM

Vicarious work for the dead.

Vicarious trauma is real, it's widespread, and it's not the same thing as “needing more self-care.” In this episode, Dr. Jill Bassett-Cameron joins Student Affairs NOW to explain what vicarious trauma is, how it shows up in our work, and why student affairs professionals must stop ignoring or minimizing it. Dr. Bassett-Cameron offers a timely and validating conversation about how we can name, manage, and reduce the trauma we absorb through service.

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of tort law, focusing on the various types of damages, including compensatory, punitive, and nominal damages. It delves into the complexities of calculating damages, the role of vicarious liability, and the distinctions between wrongful death and survival actions. The discussion also covers important defenses such as mitigation of damages and the implications of statutes of limitations and repose. Overall, it serves as a valuable resource for understanding tort law and preparing for related exams.Imagine you're preparing for a torts exam, and one concept stands out as the linchpin of it all: damages. Whether it's negligence or intentional torts, the remedy is crucial. This post explores the intricacies of tort law, focusing on damages and vicarious liability.Compensatory Damages: Compensatory damages aim to address the actual loss or injury. They are divided into economic damages, like medical bills and lost wages, and non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Understanding the distinction between lost earnings and loss of earning capacity is vital, as the former looks backward while the latter gazes into the future.Punitive and Nominal Damages: Punitive damages serve to punish and deter, requiring proof of an "evil mind." Nominal damages, though symbolic, confirm a legal right was violated, potentially unlocking significant attorney's fees.Vicarious Liability: Vicarious liability holds one party responsible for another's actions due to their relationship. The doctrine of respondeat superior is key, determining if an employer is liable for an employee's torts. The distinction between a frolic and a detour is crucial in assessing liability.Advanced Claims and Defenses: The post delves into wrongful death and survival actions, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between them. It also covers the economic loss rule, maintaining the boundary between tort and contract law, and the statutes of limitations and repose.Tort law is complex, with damages and vicarious liability at its core. Understanding these concepts is essential for anyone studying or practicing law. As the legal landscape evolves, staying informed is crucial. Subscribe now for more insights into the world of law.TakeawaysTort law revolves around remedies, primarily damages.Compensatory damages aim to make the plaintiff whole.Punitive damages serve to punish the defendant and deter future misconduct.Nominal damages are awarded to acknowledge a legal wrong without substantial harm.The collateral source rule prevents defendants from benefiting from the plaintiff's insurance.Future damages must be reasonably certain to occur to be recoverable.Non-economic damages are subjective and often capped by state laws.Vicarious liability holds employers responsible for employees' actions within the scope of employment.Loss of consortium claims are derivative and depend on the main injury claim's success.Statutes of limitations and repose set strict deadlines for filing lawsuits.tort law, negligence, damages, vicarious liability, compensatory damages, punitive damages, wrongful death, survival actions, legal remedies, law exam preparation

Vicarious Atonement

This conversation delves into the complexities of intentional torts, focusing on the mental state required for liability, the distinctions between various property torts, and the nuances of defenses such as consent and necessity. It also explores the implications of vicarious liability, emphasizing the importance of understanding these concepts for legal exams and practical applications in tort law.In the realm of intentional torts, understanding the nuances of mental state, substantial certainty, and transferred intent is crucial for both law students and practitioners. These concepts form the backbone of determining liability and defenses in cases involving intentional acts.Imagine a scenario where a child pulls a chair from under another, causing them to fall. The child's intent wasn't to harm, but the act itself led to injury. This classic example from Garrett v. Daley illustrates the importance of understanding intent in tort law. Intentional torts hinge on the actor's mental state and the certainty of the outcome, rather than malice or ill will.Mental State and Substantial Certainty: Intentional torts require a specific mental state. The focus is on the intention to perform the act that causes harm, not necessarily the intention to cause the specific harm itself. For instance, if someone throws a rock into a dense crowd, they may not aim at anyone specific, but the knowledge that harm is almost certain transforms the act into an intentional tort. This doctrine of substantial certainty acts as a substitute for proving specific intent.Transferred Intent: Transferred intent is a fascinating legal fiction that ensures accountability. It applies when a defendant intends to commit a tort against one person but inadvertently harms another. For example, if A aims a punch at B, but B ducks and A hits C, the intent transfers to the actual contact with C. This doctrine ensures that defendants cannot escape liability due to a misdirected action.Understanding these concepts is vital for navigating the complexities of intentional torts. They highlight the importance of the actor's knowledge and the consequences of their actions, ensuring that justice is served even when the harm caused wasn't the original intent. As you delve deeper into tort law, remember that these principles are not just legal technicalities but essential tools for achieving fair outcomes in the courtroom.Subscribe now to stay updated on more insights into tort law and other legal concepts.TakeawaysIntentional torts hinge on culpability, not just malice.Liability attaches if the defendant intended the act, not the harm.The focus flips from desire to knowledge of consequences in torts.Transferred intent serves a crucial purpose in tort law.Consent is a complete defense in intentional torts.Public necessity grants complete privilege from liability.Private necessity allows for tortious acts but requires compensation for damages.Battery protects bodily integrity and autonomy.Assault protects against the apprehension of imminent contact.Vicarious liability shifts the focus from individual culpability to employer responsibility.intentional torts, mental state, liability, trespass, conversion, assault, battery, emotional distress, defenses, vicarious liability

Meditate on this word, vicarious. It's a living proxy, a stand-in whose actions ripple eternally. Adam embodied humanity vicariously, not by vote or consent, but by divine design. His choice resulted in a "free gift" of sin imputed to us all, unasked, unearned (Romans 5:12-19). Did anyone poll you? Invite you to inherit Adam's sin? No. yet here we stand, heirs to the fall. But oh, the counterpoint! Jesus Christ, our true Vicar, steps into the chaos as humanity's Champion. In Him, the Trinity's redemptive council unfolds. The Father sends the Son (John 3:16), the Son lays down His life (Philippians 2:8), the Spirit seals the victory (Ephesians 1:13-14).

Somos vampiros que consumimos desgracias. Somos el alimento del morbo. Debemos redireccionar y refinar la cultura que consumimos.

Send us a text

Disclaimer: This episode discusses sensitive and potentially distressing topics, including domestic violence, rape, suicide and death. Listener discretion is advised.After nearly 200 forensic exams and 16 years in nursing, Leah Helmbrecht opens up about the emotional toll of working with survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, and human trafficking. In this raw and powerful episode, Leah shares the moments that shaped her career—and the one that led her to walk away from forensic nursing. She talks about the weight of vicarious trauma, the importance of setting personal boundaries, and why self-care isn't optional in a system that too often fails both patients and providers. Though she stepped away from the role, Leah continues to advocate fiercely for survivor support and systemic change.If you or someone you know is at risk of suicide please call the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988, text TALK to 988, or go to SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources for additional resources. If you or someone you know is in a domestic violence relationship, please reach out to the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text the word START to 88788. >>When Caring Turns to Trauma: A Forensic Nurse's Breaking PointJump Ahead to Listen:[00:01:06] Vicarious trauma in nursing.[00:07:45] Forensic nurse examiner experience.[00:12:45] Systematic betrayal of assault victims.[00:15:29] Vicarious trauma in healthcare workers.[00:20:49] Self-compassion in challenging times.[00:25:15] Red flags in relationships.[00:27:48] Love in abusive relationships.Connect With Leah on social media:Instagram: @offtheclocknurseTikTok: @offtheclocknurseFB: Off The Clock Nurse TravelsFor more information, full transcript and videos visit Nurse.org/podcastJoin our newsletter at nurse.org/joinInstagram: @nurse_orgTikTok: @nurse.orgFacebook: @nurse.orgYouTube: Nurse.org

If you are a healer and helper, do you sometimes get frustrated that trauma healing never ends?In the early days of trauma healing, trauma meant life-threatening events. Now the definition of trauma includes neglect, unmet needs, and experiences that block personal growth and self-realization.When we're done with the heaviest trauma, we notice layers of ancestral trauma. Vicarious (secondary) trauma we may carry from our clients or loved ones, collective trauma, past life trauma, and so on. It's never done!In this conversation with Alisa Gratcheva, a psychotherapist, trauma specialist, healer and spiritual seeker, we address trauma from the perspective of our soul journey and the power that is dormant underneath our traumatic experiences. We share our personal journeys navigating transgenerational and personal trauma to becoming healers and helpers. We discuss:The three stages of healing – Alisa Gracheva outlines a transformative process: self-awareness (“name it to tame it”), willingness to change, and readiness to step into discomfort—emphasizing that deep healing requires moving beyond comfort zones and habitual patterns.The spiritual dimension – Alisa highlights that lasting healing often demands reconnection with our Soul, with the Higher Self, shifting from a victim perspective to seeing challenges as catalysts for growth, and cultivating faith that even painful experiences can yield gifts.Community, nature, and ancestral roots – We explore the collective trauma of disconnection from land, ancestors, and communal living, noting how reconnection—through nature, tradition, or ancestral healing—can restore a sense of belonging and wholeness.Plant medicine as a tool – Drawing from her experience with over 100 ayahuasca ceremonies, Alisa describes how sacred medicine can accelerate healing by dissolving ego barriers and providing tools for transformation—while stressing that integration and personal responsibility are essential for lasting change.You can connect with Alisa on her website, www.since.life

If you are a healer and helper, do you sometimes get frustrated that trauma healing never ends?In the early days of trauma healing, trauma meant life-threatening events. Now the definition of trauma includes neglect, unmet needs, and experiences that block personal growth and self-realization.When we're done with the heaviest trauma, we notice layers of ancestral trauma. Vicarious (secondary) trauma we may carry from our clients or loved ones, collective trauma, past life trauma, and so on. It's never done!In this conversation with Alisa Gratcheva, a psychotherapist, trauma specialist, healer and spiritual seeker, we address trauma from the perspective of our soul journey and the power that is dormant underneath our traumatic experiences. We share our personal journeys navigating transgenerational and personal trauma to becoming healers and helpers. We discuss:The three stages of healing – Alisa Gracheva outlines a transformative process: self-awareness (“name it to tame it”), willingness to change, and readiness to step into discomfort—emphasizing that deep healing requires moving beyond comfort zones and habitual patterns.The spiritual dimension – Alisa highlights that lasting healing often demands reconnection with our Soul, with the Higher Self, shifting from a victim perspective to seeing challenges as catalysts for growth, and cultivating faith that even painful experiences can yield gifts.Community, nature, and ancestral roots – We explore the collective trauma of disconnection from land, ancestors, and communal living, noting how reconnection—through nature, tradition, or ancestral healing—can restore a sense of belonging and wholeness.Plant medicine as a tool – Drawing from her experience with over 100 ayahuasca ceremonies, Alisa describes how sacred medicine can accelerate healing by dissolving ego barriers and providing tools for transformation—while stressing that integration and personal responsibility are essential for lasting change.You can connect with Alisa on her website, www.since.life

This conversation delves into the intricate world of vicarious liability, a fundamental concept in tort law that holds one party legally responsible for the tortious acts of another based on their relationship. The discussion covers key elements such as the employer-employee relationship, the scope of employment, and the distinctions between minor detours and major frolics. It also explores the implications of intentional torts, the treatment of independent contractors, and the principles of agency law. The conversation highlights various defenses against vicarious liability claims, policy justifications for the doctrine, and modern trends in the gig economy and institutional accountability.Explain the core difference between "vicarious liability" and "direct negligence" of an employer. Vicarious liability holds an employer responsible for an employee's tortious actions, even if the employer themselves did nothing wrong, based solely on the employment relationship. Direct negligence, conversely, means the employer is liable for their own wrongful conduct, such as negligent hiring or supervision, which directly contributed to the harm.What is the purpose of the "respondeat superior" doctrine, and where did the term originate? The purpose of respondeat superior is to hold employers liable for their employees' torts committed within the scope of employment, based on the idea that employers benefit from their employees' work and should bear associated risks. The term is Latin for "let the master answer" and has roots in Roman law.Provide an example that clearly illustrates the distinction between a "frolic" and a "detour" for an employee. If a delivery driver takes a slightly longer route to see a new billboard (a minor deviation), that's a detour, and the employer could still be liable for any accidents. However, if the same driver skips work for several hours to attend a baseball game and causes an accident en route to the game (a major departure for personal benefit), that's a frolic, likely absolving the employer of vicarious liability.List three factors courts consider when determining whether an employee's actions fall within the "scope of employment." Courts consider: (1) Was the act the kind of work the employee was hired to perform? (2) Did it occur within the authorized time and space limits? (3) Was it motivated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the employer?Why are employers generally not held vicariously liable for the torts of independent contractors? Employers are generally not vicariously liable for independent contractors because they do not exercise direct control over the "manner and means" of the contractor's work. Independent contractors typically operate their own distinct business and are not economically dependent on a single hiring party in the same way an employee is.Identify two common exceptions to the general rule regarding employer non-liability for independent contractors. Two common exceptions are: (1) Non-delegable duties, where certain public safety obligations cannot be shifted to a contractor (e.g., maintaining safe premises for customers). (2) Inherently dangerous activities, where the work itself carries a significant risk of harm (e.g., demolition work).Beyond the employer-employee relationship, name two other relationships where vicarious liability principles can apply. Vicarious liability principles can also apply in principal-agent relationships (where an agent acts with authority on behalf of a principal) and partnerships (where one partner can be liable for another's torts in the ordinary course of business). Parental vicarious liability is also possible under certain circumstances.How does "negligent entrustment" differ from vicarious liability in the context of an employer's responsibility? Negligent entrustment is a form of direct negligence where an employer is liable for entrusting property (like a company vehicle) to an employee known to be unfit or reckless, and th

John Maytham turns to Michaela Höll, an associate specialising in commercial litigation and dispute resolution, to unpack the legal framework that shields platforms like Uber from direct responsibility. Michaela joins us to explore whether Uber — and companies like it — can be held vicariously liable for the actions of their drivers, and what recourse victims may have. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join Mike and Bill as they discuss The Visit, Superman, Vicarious #1, Jurassic World: Rebirth, Previews, Sandman TV Show, Godless, Warrior, Nude, Republic of Doil, Medieval Spawn #1, Curse of Sherlee Johnson #1, Free Planet #1, Exquisite Corpses #1, Ti...

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! This episode is the final in our Torts trilogy, where we're summarizing the topics from Torts we've covered in our "Listen and Learn" series. Today we're talking about strict liability and vicarious liability, and we review the key defenses - assumption of risk and comparative negligence. In this episode, we discuss: Strict products liability of manufacturers and sellers Vicarious liability, or when one person becomes legally responsible for the torts of another Defenses in liability cases An attack plan for answering liability questions on the bar exam Resources: Private Bar Exam Tutoring (https://barexamtoolbox.com/private-bar-exam-tutoring/) Podcast Episode 131: Listen and Learn – Strict Products Liability (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-131-listen-and-learn-strict-products-liability/) Podcast Episode 197: Listen and Learn – Vicarious Liability (Torts) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-197-listen-and-learn-vicarious-liability-torts/) Podcast Episode 107: Listen and Learn – Assumption of Risk (Torts) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-107-listen-and-learn-assumption-of-risk-torts/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-319-spotlight-on-torts-part-3-strict-and-vicarious-liability/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on  Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Send us a textIn this flavorful and focused episode of Joey Pinz Discipline Conversations, Tanya Alfonso — chef-trained tech executive and cybersecurity leader at Vicarious — joins us from Pax8 Beyond 2025 to talk about precision, process, and performance in the kitchen and in business.From her IBM days to knife skills in culinary school, Tanya shares how her love for cooking fuels her leadership style. Organization, attention to detail, and routine aren't just part of her home kitchen — they're baked into her approach to cybersecurity, MSP partnership, and life.At Vicarious, Tanya helps Managed Service Providers streamline vulnerability remediation, not just detection. She explains how Vicarious goes beyond patching to include patchless protection and scripting — essential in a landscape where 50% of threats won't have a patch available.We also dive into Tanya's take on discipline, mental focus, and personal joy. From 5:30 a.m. workouts to weekly fridge cleans, she shares how consistency fuels both her work-life balance and professional growth. 

Rebeccasode! Dr Kirk and Rebecca answer patron emails.This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/KIRK to get 10% off your first month.00:00 Handling a bigoted friend10:22 How can I support a crossdressing partner?16:54 Has therapy speak become a disservice to our clients?48:34 Is it okay to bring a stuffed animal to therapy? 51:40 Vicarious trauma and burnout as a therapist1:06:23 Is broaching always necessary? Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/joinBecome a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattleEmail: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contactWebsite: https://www.psychologyinseattle.comMerch: https://psychologyinseattle-shop.fourthwall.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.hondaJune 13, 2025The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

Vicarious Suffering - Ken Rucker (06-08-2025) by NewBranch

The complex legal landscape of vicarious liability takes center stage in this illuminating discussion with Lawyer Michael Mulligan. At the heart of our conversation is a heartbreaking Victoria case where a retired teacher-turned-tutor sexually abused a grade six student, resulting in a $2.3 million judgment. We dissect the Court of Appeal's reasoning on why, despite creating the initial relationship, the school board wasn't held vicariously liable for the teacher's actions that occurred after retirement and away from school grounds.The legal principle at stake here affects countless institutions across Canada. While the abuse would never have occurred without the school's arrangement, the court determined this causal connection alone wasn't enough to establish liability. Tragically, with the perpetrator deceased, the victim's substantial judgment may go largely uncollected, demonstrating how technical legal distinctions can profoundly impact survivors' ability to receive compensation.We also examine two other rulings with everyday implications for Canadians. If you've ever missed your traffic court date due to illness, take note: the BC Supreme Court has confirmed doctor's notes aren't mandatory for appeals. Alternative evidence, like medication receipts or witness affidavits, can suffice – a welcome clarification that removes unnecessary barriers to justice.Looking toward our digital future, we analyze a split Supreme Court of Canada decision determining that 5G antennas don't qualify as "transmission lines" under telecommunications regulations. This seemingly technical ruling means telecom giants must now negotiate with individual municipalities to install the hundreds of thousands of small antennas needed for nationwide 5G coverage, potentially affecting the rollout of next-generation wireless technology in your neighbourhood.Have you encountered any of these legal issues? These cases highlight how judicial interpretations directly affect everything from institutional accountability to your traffic ticket disputes and even your cell phone reception.Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

Turn off the music and prepare for the emotional equivalent of an unaccompanied karaoke performance in front of strangers, because we're diving into the topic of embarrassment and it's sure to bring up some squirm-worthy memories.    This episode, Grace is walking you through the science behind embarrassment–firsthand, secondhand, and beyond. She's covering what goes on in the brain during moments of embarrassment, why secondhand embarrassment seems to plague AuDHDers more than most, and strategies for releasing your internal judgement of yourself and others.    Remember, you can't be embarrassed if you're not embarrassed, so come join us as we work on letting our freak flags fly.  Resources The Science Behind Embarrassment https://neurolaunch.com/extreme-embarrassment-autism/ Vicarious embarrassment - Wikipedia Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (RSD): Symptoms & Treatment   Wild Life Videos - Fluffy-backed tit-babbler

In tonight's episode, we discuss how Christ's victory over sin, death and the devil means we are vicariously set free.

Send us a textPersonal wellness does not happen in isolation. In this Fundamentals of Wellness episode, Tom and Ruth examine how health is shaped by both individual habits and our shared environment.Using the recent Fort Collins mall incident as a case study, they address:Vicarious trauma – why events you only hear about can still activate your stress response.Me-We homeostasis – the science of co-regulation and how supportive communities shift us from fight-or-flight to rest-and-recovery.Chronos vs. Kairos – understanding linear time versus “the opportune moment” to steer your well-being in a healthier direction.The power of “AND” – moving from anxious “yeah, but …” thinking to productive “yes, and …” mindsets that open space for healing.You'll learn practical ways to notice sympathetic surges, create collective resilience rituals, and make time work for—rather than against—your health.Listen in to turn moments of strain into pathways toward shared strength.Support the showThanks for listening!You can follow us onFacebook Instagram Leave us a review on Apple Podcasts Check out the Autonomic Healing Website & InnerWorkings WebsiteEmail Tom thomasjpals@innerworkings.orgEmail Ruth ruth@bridgeandrhino.comSupport usWe appreciate you!

In this episode of Nurse Converse, Jeri Ford and Danielle Palomares dive deep into the emotional complexities of vicarious trauma—a profound experience many healthcare providers face as they care for others in distress.Together, they unpack what vicarious trauma is, how it manifests, and the often-overlooked emotional toll it takes on nurses and other caregivers. From identifying symptoms to setting boundaries with patients, Jeri and Danielle share personal insights and professional strategies for recognizing, understanding, and managing the impact of bearing witness to suffering. Whether you're a nurse, clinician, or caregiver, this conversation offers valuable guidance on how to honor your emotional experiences while continuing to provide compassionate care. >>The Impact of Vicarious Trauma on Nurses and How to CopeJump Ahead to Listen: [00:01:18] Vicarious trauma in healthcare workers.[00:10:35] Medical anxiety in healthcare workers.[00:15:11] Emotional challenges in nursing.[00:20:29] Developing stress resistance strategies.[00:23:07] Community support and social resourcing.[00:25:14] Emotional capacity and experiences.[00:28:40] Seeking support for self-awareness.Connect with Jeri on social media:Instagram: @jerilynn_89TikTok: @jerilynn_89For more information, full transcript and videos visit Nurse.org/podcastJoin our newsletter at nurse.org/joinInstagram: @nurse_orgTikTok: @nurse.orgFacebook: @nurse.orgYouTube: Nurse.org

Even though you've left the relationship, do you still feel embarrassed when you remember the way your ex treated others? Do you find yourself cringing at memories of their public outbursts, apologizing for their past behavior, or worrying that others judge you because of them?This lingering sense of responsibility is called vicarious shame—when you feel embarrassed on behalf of someone else's actions, even though you weren't the one who did anything wrong.In this episode, we explore:✔️ Why vicarious shame lingers long after leaving an abuser✔️ How abusers used it to manipulate and control you✔️ The emotional toll of feeling responsible for someone else's behavior✔️ Steps to stop carrying their shame and fully step into your own healingVicarious shame is a tool abusers rely on to keep you second-guessing yourself, isolating from support, and feeling like you need to "fix" things that were never your fault. But the truth is: You are not responsible for their actions—then or now.Join community here - https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/?msopen=/member/plans/allWhen you join the RB community, you'll get expert thoughts from me and others on strategy, parenting, family court, healing, all the things, connection with other survivors in a safe place. And in a place where you won't have to defend yourself anymore. We believe you. You'll also have access to live events, workshops, and our online forum. Doors close on midnight, Tuesday, February 11th. Please leave us a review or rating and follow/subscribe to the show. This helps the show get out to more people.If you want to chat more about this topic I would love to continue our conversation over on Instagram! @risingbeyondpcIf you want to support the show you may do so here at, Buy Me A Coffee. Thank you! We love being able to make this information accessible to you and your community.If you've been looking for a supportive community of women going through the topics we cover, head over to our website to learn more about the Rising Beyond Community. - https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/ Where to find more from Rising Beyond:Rising Beyond FacebookRising Beyond LinkedInRising Beyond Pinterest If you're interested in guesting on the show please fill out this form - https://forms.gle/CSvLWWyZxmJ8GGQu7Enjoy some of our freebies! Choosing Your Battles Freebie Canned Responses Freebie Mic Drop Moments Freebie ...