Podcasts about True crime

We talk theories about the mysterious disappearance of the Roanoke colony.Check out our new True Crime Substack the True Crime Times Check out our other show The Prosecutors: Legal Briefs for discussion on cases, controversial topics, or conversations with content creators.Get Prosecutors Podcast Merch Join the Gallery on Facebook Follow us on TwitterFollow us on Instagram Check out our website for case resources: Hang out with us on TikTokSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Detective Pillar finishes cross exam We had 2 witnesses  giving the results of the DNA and gunshot residue testing Rexburg lead detective, Lt Ray Hermosillo took the stand and told the jury about finding the Jeep, the storage shed video, the search warrants on the Jeep and townhomes, and introduced the storage unit video to the jury showing Lori go with Chad Daybed to take the spare tire and backseat and returning 24 hours later with Alex to retrieve it after the attempt on Brandon. FBI analyst Nick Ballance is the state's final witness tomorrow. If Lori has no witnesses, the judge will give jury instruction and we move into closings, then verdict watch.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Amber Spradlin, Aliza Sherman, & Amy Hooper  ////// UpdatesPart 1 of 1  www.TrueCrimeGarage.comThis week from the Garage, we are very happy to be bringing to you major updates in three cases that we have covered. 38 year old Amber Spradlin was killed at an after work party sometime in the night of June 18, 2023. True Crime Garage covered this case in July of 2023 with episode #687. Since, arrests have been made and trial dates have been set. In 2013 Cleveland Clinic nurse Aliza Sherman was killed in downtown Cleveland in broad daylight. Back in December of 2017 we covered his “stranger than fiction” true crime story in a four part series. These were episodes #167 to #170. As we predicted Aliza Sherman's divorce attorney Gregory Moore was arrested and charged with her murder. In March of 1992, Amy Hooper was murdered in her Lincoln Village apartment on the westside of Columbus, Ohio. In December of 2025 Bruce Daniels was arrested for this homicide in Washington state. We are keeping a close eye on this one as it inches closer to the murder trial.  Original True Crime Garage coverage: Aliza Sherman - December 2017 - Episodes 167 to 170Amy Hooper - April 2019 - Episodes 294 & 295 Amber Spradlin - July 2023 - Episode 687All are available on this feed - listen for FREE Beer of the Week - Mothman Double Imperial New England Style IPA from Ogopogo BrewingGarage Grade - 4 out of 5 bottle caps  More True Crime Garage can be found on Patreon and Apple subscriptions with our show - Off The Record.  Catch dozens of episodes of Off The Record plus a couple of Bonus episodes and our first 50 when you sign up today.  True Crime Garage merchandise is available on our website's store page.  Plus get True Crime Garage Pod art that you can post on your socials on our Media page.  Follow the show on X and Insta @TrueCrimeGarage / Follow Nic on X @TCGNIC / Follow The Captain on X @TCGCaptain  Thanks for listening and thanks for telling a friend.  Be good, be kind, and don't litter! 

This week, we finish up this crazy story, with Eamonn being beaten by local rivals, not in the ring, but in the street, with baseball bats. This causes him to nearly retire, as he wasn't even supposed to be able to walk again, but he beat the odds, earning a new nickname. He also continues his alcoholism, while being arrested several more times, for violent outbursts, often against women. A final tragedy leaves him depressed, and broken, but he keeps pushing on. Will he survive this story??   Have a local lottery winner beat your legs into retirement, be married to, and engaged to, several women at the same time, and try your hardest to not drink, for a week, so you can get a life saving operation with Eamonn "The Terminator" Magee - Part 5!!   Check us out, every Tuesday! We will continue to bring you the biggest idiots in sports history!!   Hosted by James Pietragallo & Jimmie Whisman   Donate at... patreon.com/crimeinsports or with paypal.com using our email crimeinsports@gmail.com   Get all the CIS & STM merch at crimeinsports.threadless.com   Go to shutupandgivememurder.com for all things CIS, STM & YSO!!   Contact us on...   instagram.com/smalltownmurder facebook.com/crimeinsports crimeinsports@gmail.com

As the 1940s draws to a close, Georgia Tann is still making thousands from her black-market baby ring. But although she's been untouchable for the last two decades, a shift in Memphis's political climate signals trouble.Be the first to know about Wondery's newest podcasts, curated recommendations, and more! Sign up now at https://wondery.fm/wonderynewsletterListen to American Scandal on the Wondery App or wherever you get your podcasts. Experience all episodes ad-free and be the first to binge the newest season. Unlock exclusive early access by joining Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Start your free trial today by visiting wondery.com/links/american-scandal/ now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This episode originally aired on June 29, 2021. By May 23, 2020, 41-year-old Ian Eckles had been missing for a week. He had made plans to go hunting with a friend, but never showed up at their meeting spot. When he failed to report to work the next day, concern quickly turned into alarm.Ian's family and friends launched a desperate search across the rugged terrain of the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest along Washington's Cascade Mountains. Exhausted and running on adrenaline, they scoured the wilderness for any sign of him.Then, something surreal happened. Ian's FJ Cruiser came barreling down the mountain. But Ian wasn't driving. A brief, tense encounter with the man behind the wheel ended with him fleeing into the forest, and a chase that didn't last long.That encounter triggered a massive manhunt for an armed and dangerous fugitive, and it raised even more questions about what really happened to Ian Eckles.If you have a missing loved one that you would like to have featured on the show, please fill out our case submission form: http://www.thevanishedpodcast.com/case-submission/.Follow The Vanished on social media at:FacebookInstagramTwitterPatreonSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Carlos King, reality television producer and host of the Reality with the King podcast, joins Kate to break down the latest scandal on The Real Housewives of Atlanta, Paige's surprising exit from Summer House, and the buzz around Rachel Zoe potentially joining The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: http://www.tiktok.com/itskatecasey Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What it's like to be 11 years old and accused of murdering your pregnant soon-to-be stepmother. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Retired FBI agent and criminal profiler Candice DeLong dives into the chilling case of Judy Buenoano, a woman who earned the nickname “The Black Widow of Florida” after a string of suspicious deaths in her life. Over nearly a decade, Judy concealed her crimes behind a mask of composure and caregiving, using poison, drowning, and even car bombs to eliminate those closest to her. But when Judy's overconfidence led authorities straight to her, her elaborate web of lies began to unravel – leading to her demise. Candice explores how greed, compulsive lying, and a ruthless need for control allowed Judy to kill without remorse.Be the first to know about Wondery's newest podcasts, curated recommendations, and more! Sign up now at https://wondery.fm/wonderynewsletterNeed more Killer Psyche? With Wondery+, enjoy exclusive episodes, early access to new ones, and they're always ad-free. Start your free trial in the Wondery App or visit wondery.app.link/TI5l5KzpDLb now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The dead don't usually testify at their own murder trials, but in the smoke-stained alleys of Chicago, I learned that some victims refuse to let their killers walk free — even from beyond the grave.Watch the VIDEO VERSION of this episode: https://weirddarkness.com/noir-selfsolvingmurderTHE TRUE CRIME CASE THIS STORY IS BASED ON: In 1977, Teresita Basa, a 48-year-old respiratory therapist in Chicago, was found murdered in her burned-out apartment. Months later, police received a bizarre tip from a man claiming his wife, Remy Chua — who had briefly worked with Basa — was channeling messages from Basa's ghost during trances. According to the spirit, she had been murdered by a coworker named Allan Showery, who then staged the scene and stole her jewelry. Investigators followed the supernatural lead and discovered many details matched real evidence. Showery's girlfriend even confirmed he had given her Basa's jewelry. Confronted with mounting proof, Showery confessed to the crime. Despite the strange nature of the case, Teresita Basa became known as “the woman who solved her own murder from beyond the grave.ORIGINAL CASE SOURCES…https://www.ranker.com/list/teresita-basa-case/patrick-thorntonMusic provided by Alibi Music Library= = = = ="I have come into the world as a light, so that no one who believes in me should stay in darkness." — John 12:46= = = = =WeirdDarkness® is a registered trademark. Copyright ©2025, Weird Darkness.= = = = =Originally aired: June 10, 2025NOTE: Some of this content may have been created with assistance from AI tools, but it has been reviewed, edited, narrated, produced, and approved by Darren Marlar, creator and host of Weird Darkness — who, despite popular conspiracy theories, is NOT an AI voice. (AI Policy)CUSTOM WEBPAGE: https://weirddarkness.com/noir-selfsolvingmurder

Several quick witnesses introduce evidence and we end the day with Det Pillar on the standAcoustics aren't the best in the AirBNB - sorry for the lack of quality! ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

As Donna Adelson awaits trial in the murder-for-hire plot of Dan Markel, explosive new motions seek to suppress key testimony. Meanwhile, disturbing jail logs suggest a potential mental health breakdown behind bars #STSNation, Welcome to Surviving the Survivor — the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime. Tonight, we break down stunning new developments in the Donna Adelson case: • A motion to suppress testimony from Sara Yousuf, a former friend of Wendi Adelson, who says Donna called Dan “a jerk” shortly after his murder. • A separate legal push to block Stephen Webster, Dan's post-divorce attorney, from testifying about alleged comments and family dynamics. • And perhaps most shocking: new jail logs suggest Donna has been pacing her cell naked and laughing to herself, raising questions about her mental state and trial readiness. The trial is now set for August, but the legal chess match is heating up fast. #BestGuests: • R. Timothy Jansen, famed Tallahassee criminal defense attorney & former federal prosecutor • Professor Jo Potuto, Professor Emerita, University of Nebraska College of Law, constitutional and criminal law expert Join us as we cut through the legal noise and get to the truth behind the headlines.#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #FSULaw #JusticeForDanMarkel #CriminalDefense #TrialCoverage #MentalHealth #JailhouseBehavior #LegalAnalysis #SurvivingTheSurvivor⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

Julie Grant and her expert guests analyze whether Karen Read's defense or the Commonwealth's accident reconstructionist is more believable. Plus, Lori Daybell gets thrown out of court after sparring with the judge.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #KarenRead here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

The principal focus of this second installment of our series is the ongoing investigation into the perplexing disappearance of Lindsay Wells, who vanished while nine months pregnant on March 27, 1999. In this episode, we engage once more with Melanie Flowers, who provides further insights and reflections on Lindsay's case, emphasizing the profound implications of her absence not only for her loved ones but also for the community. We delve into the details surrounding the investigation, exploring the troubling lack of interest and action from law enforcement that has perpetuated the mystery for over two decades. As we dissect the elements surrounding Lindsay's disappearance, we are reminded of the importance of keeping her story alive, ensuring that her memory endures and seeking justice for her and her child. Join us as we reflect on the intricacies of this heart-wrenching case and the enduring impact it has had on those who loved her.The views expressed in this podcast are solely my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my partners. These are my opinions and theories and the people mentioned are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.ww.allisondubois.com

Federal prosecutors have filed a motion to exclude testimony from Dr. Elie Aoun, a forensic psychiatrist and assistant professor at Columbia University, whom Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense team intends to call as an expert witness. The defense aims to have Dr. Aoun testify regarding Combs' mental state during the period of the alleged offenses, suggesting that Combs may have had diminished mental capacity. However, the government argues that Dr. Aoun's proposed testimony is inadmissible under the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, which govern the introduction of expert testimony related to a defendant's mental condition. Prosecutors contend that Dr. Aoun's opinions lack a reliable scientific basis and appear to be speculative, rendering them unsuitable for presentation to the jury.Additionally, the government asserts that allowing Dr. Aoun's testimony would effectively permit the defense to introduce a mental health defense without adhering to the procedural requirements mandated by law. They argue that the defense has not provided sufficient notice or evidence to support such a defense, and that Dr. Aoun's testimony would serve as a substitute for calling actual witnesses, thereby circumventing the rules of evidence. The prosecution maintains that admitting this testimony could mislead the jury and prejudice the government's case, and therefore, they urge the court to preclude Dr. Aoun from testifying at trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.276.0_1.pdf

Peacock is set to premiere a new documentary titled "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy" on January 14, 2025. This 90-minute film delves into the early years of Sean "Diddy" Combs, the rapper and music mogul currently facing serious legal challenges, including charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. The documentary features interviews with individuals from Combs' past, such as childhood friends, former bodyguards, and singer Al B. Sure! It also includes anonymous testimonies alleging misconduct, including claims of inappropriate sexual activities involving underage girls in so-called "red rooms."The film aims to provide a comprehensive look at Combs' transformation over the decades, shedding light on the influences that may have shaped his actions. It presents firsthand accounts from former colleagues who describe a climate of fear and aggressive control tactics during their time working with him. Additionally, the documentary includes unseen footage of Combs' personal life, offering viewers an intimate glimpse into his world. "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy" is part of a broader trend of reexamining the lives of prominent figures in the music industry, with more productions expected to explore Combs' life and actions in the future.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's entourage turn on him in explosive new 'Making of a Bad Boy' documentary | Daily Mail Online

After the lunch break, the courtroom resumed with Jane continuing her emotional testimony. She described a violent confrontation in June 2024, saying Combs had kicked open the bathroom door, thrown her to the ground in the backyard, punched, kicked, dragged her by her hair and choked her—leaving bruises and swelling. She recounted how he then forced her into yet another drug‑fueled “freak‑off” involving a male escort, despite her repeated refusals. As Combs allegedly guided her, he even taunted her with the question: “Is this coercion?Later in the afternoon, the court delved into the fallout after Cassie Ventura's November 2023 lawsuit became public. “Jane” recounted reading the lawsuit and feeling “like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,” nearly fainting as pages mirrored her own experience.   The jury listened to two emotionally charged phone calls between her and Combs, where he implored for her friendship, while she voiced feeling manipulated and triggered by the lawsuit's revelations.   The session concluded with her tearful statement: “I pray for peace for him,"  to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:June 9, 2025 - Day 19 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, alleges that prosecutors have violated his rights by spying on him in his jail cell. His legal team contends that during a routine facility search, federal investigators photographed Combs' handwritten notes—considered privileged attorney-client communications—and shared them with prosecutors. They argue this action constitutes a blatant infringement on his right to confidentially prepare his defense.Additionally, Combs' attorneys claim that the government has been unlawfully surveilling his communications and restricting his access to essential legal resources, such as a government-provided laptop critical for his defense preparation. They assert that the Metropolitan Detention Center has improperly shared attorney visitation records with prosecutors, further compromising his ability to mount an effective defense. These allegations have led to legal motions seeking immediate hearings to address these concerns and to prevent further potential violations of Combs' rights.(commercial at 8:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's latest courtroom claim sparks furious response from prosecutors | Daily Mail Online

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing two new sexual assault lawsuits filed in December 2024. The first lawsuit, brought by an anonymous Jane Doe, alleges that Combs drugged and raped her in 1991 during a charity basketball event in New York City. According to the complaint, the plaintiff was introduced to Combs at the event, where he offered her a drink that caused her to feel disoriented. She claims to have regained consciousness in a private room, where Combs allegedly assaulted her. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as false and financially motivated.The second lawsuit was filed by LaTroya Grayson, who asserts that she was sexually assaulted at Combs' "White Party" in New York City in October 2006. Grayson alleges that after winning a radio contest to attend the event, she consumed a beverage provided by the event staff, after which she lost consciousness. She later awoke in a hospital with no memory of the events, missing clothing, and signs of assault. Grayson claims to have experienced significant physical and emotional distress following the incident. Combs' representatives have refuted these claims, maintaining his innocence and criticizing the lawsuits as opportunistic attempts to tarnish his reputation.(commercial at 9:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy hit with two more sexual assault lawsuits as claims against him mount ahead of criminal trial | Daily Mail Online

Jay-Z's legal team has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the rapper of rape, arguing that the case is based on allegations tainted by "severe" legal misconduct. The accuser, who claims the incident occurred decades ago, gave a public interview that Jay-Z's lawyers contend violates legal norms, potentially prejudicing the case. They argue that the interview and the accuser's public statements were orchestrated to garner publicity and improperly influence the court proceedings. Additionally, Jay-Z's legal team insists that the claims are not only unsubstantiated but also barred by the statute of limitations, rendering the lawsuit legally deficient.The motion highlights the inconsistencies and credibility issues in the accuser's narrative, alleging that her actions undermine the integrity of the legal process. Jay-Z's attorneys also stress that the public nature of her interview disregards legal protocols designed to ensure a fair trial. They maintain that the lawsuit is baseless and represents an abuse of the judicial system, urging the court to dismiss the case promptly. (commercial at 9:29)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jay-Z's lawyers ask to dismiss rape lawsuit after accuser's interview amid 'severe' legal misconduct | Daily Mail Online

In their letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense opposed motions by Mia, Ms. Ventura, and the government seeking to quash compliance with a subpoena directed to Mia, which the Court had previously ordered on May 31, 2025. The defense argued that the objections raised by both Ms. Ventura and the government lacked valid legal grounds and did not justify quashing the subpoena. They contended that Mia's arguments were also without merit, asserting that the subpoena was properly issued under Rule 17(c) and sought relevant, admissible evidence essential to preparing the defense.The defense maintained that the subpoena targeted materials directly related to Mia's credibility and potential biases, which were critical to the cross-examination process. They emphasized that the subpoena did not represent an undue burden or violate any protections afforded to the witness. Instead, they argued that granting the motions to quash would undermine the defendant's right to a fair trial and to confront witnesses. Accordingly, the defense urged the Court to deny the motions and enforce compliance with the subpoena as originally ordered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.385.0.pdf

Sean “Diddy” Combs' case is unfolding within the strict architecture of the federal criminal justice system, meaning every stage—from indictment through sentencing—is governed by the same procedural and constitutional rules described above. His arrest followed a lengthy investigation, likely involving sealed warrants, grand jury subpoenas, and cooperation from multiple agencies. Once federal authorities gathered enough evidence to establish probable cause, a grand jury returned an indictment, triggering his initial appearance in federal court. There, issues like bail, representation, and pretrial release were addressed under the Bail Reform Act. With a trial date now scheduled, the case has moved past the early procedural phases and is entering the critical stages of pretrial motions and evidentiary challenges, including potential Rule 12 motions by the defense to suppress evidence or challenge the sufficiency of the indictment.As Diddy's federal trial begins today, he now faces the full weight of the government's case under the high-stakes adversarial structure of federal criminal procedure. With plea negotiations reportedly rejected, the prosecution must now prove its allegations beyond a reasonable doubt before a jury. The courtroom will become a battleground for evidentiary rulings, cross-examinations, and strategic maneuvering, all governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure. Defense counsel will work to undermine the government's witnesses, challenge the admissibility of key materials, and inject doubt into the narrative being presented. If convicted, Diddy would then move into the sentencing phase, where the U.S. Probation Office will prepare a Presentence Investigation Report factoring in conduct enhancements and criminal history to produce an advisory Guidelines range. His sentence would ultimately be shaped by both the Guidelines and the judge's application of the § 3553(a) factors—bringing the full machinery of federal prosecution to bear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

After the lunch break, the courtroom resumed with Jane continuing her emotional testimony. She described a violent confrontation in June 2024, saying Combs had kicked open the bathroom door, thrown her to the ground in the backyard, punched, kicked, dragged her by her hair and choked her—leaving bruises and swelling. She recounted how he then forced her into yet another drug‑fueled “freak‑off” involving a male escort, despite her repeated refusals. As Combs allegedly guided her, he even taunted her with the question: “Is this coercion?Later in the afternoon, the court delved into the fallout after Cassie Ventura's November 2023 lawsuit became public. “Jane” recounted reading the lawsuit and feeling “like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,” nearly fainting as pages mirrored her own experience.   The jury listened to two emotionally charged phone calls between her and Combs, where he implored for her friendship, while she voiced feeling manipulated and triggered by the lawsuit's revelations.   The session concluded with her tearful statement: “I pray for peace for him,"  to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:June 9, 2025 - Day 19 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense reiterated its renewed objections to the admission of exhibits GXE-331-F-R and GXE-331-H-R, which were introduced during the continued direct examination of the witness “Jane” on June 6, 2025. The defense argued that these exhibits were either improperly authenticated or unfairly prejudicial, lacking the necessary foundation for admission under the Federal Rules of Evidence. They maintained that the government's use of these materials risked misleading the jury and compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial.Additionally, the defense sought to provide broader legal context to guide the Court's rulings on any similar evidentiary issues moving forward. They emphasized the importance of applying a consistent and rigorous standard to the admission of exhibits that could impact witness credibility or the core allegations in the case. The letter urged the Court to sustain the defense's objections and exercise heightened scrutiny to prevent the introduction of unreliable or prejudicial evidence that could unduly influence the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.387.0.pdf

Sierra is all moved in and back with her underwater crimes episode. This week she tells us about some treasure hunting gone wrong with the case of Tommy Thompson and the gold hunt of the SS Central America.Want more twisted content? Consider joining our Patreon for some welcome goodies and 100+ bonus episodes ready for you to unlock. Your support truly means the world to us. https://www.patreon.com/twistedanduncorkedYou can buy us a drink on Buy Me A Coffee https://www.buymeacoffee.com/twistedpodCheck out our website for sources and photos from todays episode www.twistedanduncorked.comWatch on our YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/@twistedanduncorkedFollow us on all of the socials:Instagram and TikTok @twistedanduncorkedTwitter @twisted_podFacebook @twistedanduncorkedpodcast

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24-cr-542), the defense has filed a memorandum seeking a hearing, suppression of evidence, and other relief. The defense argues that government leaks have led to prejudicial pre-trial publicity, compromising Combs' right to a fair trial. They specifically allege that the Department of Homeland Security leaked a 2016 video showing Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, to tarnish his reputation. The defense requests an evidentiary hearing to investigate these leaks, discovery of related government communications, a gag order to prevent further disclosures, and suppression of any evidence obtained through these alleged leaks.Additionally, the defense contends that the conditions of Combs' pre-trial detention hinder his ability to prepare for trial, infringing upon his constitutional rights. They propose a comprehensive bail package, including a $50 million bond secured by property and co-signed by family members, home detention with electronic monitoring, and strict limitations on communication and visitation. The defense asserts that these measures sufficiently mitigate any concerns regarding flight risk or danger to the community, emphasizing Combs' strong family ties and community involvement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.98.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense reiterated its renewed objections to the admission of exhibits GXE-331-F-R and GXE-331-H-R, which were introduced during the continued direct examination of the witness “Jane” on June 6, 2025. The defense argued that these exhibits were either improperly authenticated or unfairly prejudicial, lacking the necessary foundation for admission under the Federal Rules of Evidence. They maintained that the government's use of these materials risked misleading the jury and compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial.Additionally, the defense sought to provide broader legal context to guide the Court's rulings on any similar evidentiary issues moving forward. They emphasized the importance of applying a consistent and rigorous standard to the admission of exhibits that could impact witness credibility or the core allegations in the case. The letter urged the Court to sustain the defense's objections and exercise heightened scrutiny to prevent the introduction of unreliable or prejudicial evidence that could unduly influence the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.387.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the fall of 1940, an employ of the Consolidated Edison Company in Manhattan discovered a bomb in the company's main offices, along with a note that read “Con Edison crooks – this is for you.” The bomb was discovered before it detonated and no one was harmed, but a year later the company received a second bomb, followed by a note to NYPD in which the bomber announced he would make no bombs for the duration of WWII, but would begin again as the war ended.As promised, a new series of bombings began across New York in the winter of 1951, beginning with an explosion at Grand Central Station. In the five years that followed, “The Mad Bomber,” as he would come to be known, would place explosives at some of New York's most iconic locations including Radio City Music Hall, Penn Station, and the New York Public Library. The bombs were often followed by cryptic letters sent to the press, usually referencing the Consolidated Edison Company.Th Mad Bomber's reign of terror finally came to an end with his capture in 1957, and neither the suspect nor his motives made much sense to the New Yorkers who'd lived in fear for five years.Thank you to the Incredible Dave White of Bring Me the Axe Podcast for research and Writing support!ReferencesAssociated Press. 1955. "The 'Mad Bomber' threatens Macy's." Buffalo News, May 5: 47.—. 1957. "'Bomber' sick but innocent, sisters say." Newsday, Janaury 22: 3.Baird, John, and Harry Schlegal. 1956. "Mad Bomber blast in B'klyn movie; 6 hurt." Daily News, December 3: 2.Berger, Meyer. 1957. "Bomber is booked; sent to Bellevue for mental tests." New York Times, January 23: 1.Demeusy, Gerald. 1981. "'Bomber' says life all broken dreams." Hartford Courant, November 16: 15.Greenburg, Michael M. 2011. The Mad Bomber of New York: The Extraordinary True Story of the Manhunt That Paralyzed a City. New York, NY: Union Square Press.Kaufman, Michael. 1973. "'Mad Bomber,' now 70, goes free." New York Times, December 13: 1.New York Times. 1957. "2d 'Bomber' note cites old injury." New York Times, January 16: 25.—. 1953. "A homemade bomb rips station locker." New York Times, May 7: 28.—. 1951. "Bomb blast in terminal: Homemade device explodes in Grand Central--no one is hurt." New York Times, March 30: 24.—. 1954. "Bomb in music hall injures 4 in crowd." New York Times, November 8: 1.—. 1951. "Bomb laid to prankster." New York Times, September 13: 33.—. 1957. "'Bomber' ordered to state hospital." New York Times, April 19: 44.—. 1957. "'Bomber' presses threat on utility." New York Times, January 11: 16.—. 1951. "Ex-Edison worker held in bomb case." New York Times, November 7: 32.—. 1966. "'Mad Bomber' to get hearing on sanity." New York Times, April 29: 17.—. 1957. "Metesky indicted on bomb charges." New York Times, January 31: 29.—. 1955. "Penn Station bomb blast is ignored by commuters." New York Times, Janaury 12: 11.—. 1951. "Police find bomb in Paramount Lounge; note spurs search for one at Penn Station." New York Times, October 23: 30.—. 1957. "Suspect is held as 'Mad Bomber'; he admits role." New York Times, January 22: 1.—. 1956. "The Mad Bomber." New York Times, December 30: B2.O'Kane, Lawrence. 1955. "Bomb left in Roxy; linked to 22 others." New York Times, August 12: 1.Parke, Richard. 1957. "Sisters shocked, loyal to brother." New York Times, January 23: 20.Sheridan, Mike. 1977. "Former Mad Bomber now a homebody." Hartford Courant, May 1: 22.Stay in the know - wondery.fm/morbid-wondery.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Do you believe that all non-vegans should die? In part for their needless murder of senseless people like.... cows? And in part because their predatory, cruel, EVIL behavior is providing a model for a future AI program to treat humans like a mindless food source once it inevitably takes over the world? If so... you'd make a good Zizian! This is a weird one. Merch and more: www.badmagicproductions.com Timesuck Discord! https://discord.gg/tqzH89vWant to join the Cult of the Curious PrivateFacebook Group? Go directly to Facebook and search for "Cult of the Curious" to locate whatever happens to be our most current page :)For all merch-related questions/problems: store@badmagicproductions.com (copy and paste)Please rate and subscribe on Apple Podcasts and elsewhere and follow the suck on social media!! @timesuckpodcast on IG and http://www.facebook.com/timesuckpodcastWanna become a Space Lizard? Click here: https://www.patreon.com/timesuckpodcast.Sign up through Patreon, and for $5 a month, you get access to the entire Secret Suck catalog (295 episodes) PLUS the entire catalog of Timesuck, AD FREE. You'll also get 20% off of all regular Timesuck merch PLUS access to exclusive Space Lizard merch.

Santa Monica, CA. March 16, 2008. 21-year-old Juliana Redding was found strangled to death in her bungalow apartment. When authorities arrived to the scene they smelled gas and saw a candle. Not only was Juliana murdered, but whoever was responsible had intended to blow the crime scene up.For bonus episodes and outtakes visit: patreon.com/generationwhyListen ad free with Wondery+. Join Wondery+ for exclusives, binges, early access, and ad free listening. Available in the Wondery App. https://wondery.app.link/generationwhy.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This episode originally aired on June 28, 2021. 41-year-old Ian Eckles was an avid outdoorsman who enjoyed hunting and spending time in the wilderness. So when he planned a weekend hunting trip near Liberty, Washington, with a friend, it seemed like nothing out of the ordinary. But when his friend arrived at their meeting spot deep in the national forest, Ian was nowhere to be found. There was no sign of him, his vehicle, or his gear.What began as a missing person case quickly evolved into something far more complex. Ian's family, friends, and law enforcement have been searching for answers since May 2020. They haven't found Ian, but what they have uncovered since his disappearance is more shocking than anyone expected.If you have a missing loved one that you would like to have featured on the show, please fill out our case submission form: http://www.thevanishedpodcast.com/case-submission/.Follow The Vanished on social media at:FacebookInstagramPatreonSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In 1993, Joseph Wellnitz, his wife Beth, and their 20-year-old son Dennis were murdered inside their Columbia, Kentucky home. Although the police had their suspicions early on, it took nearly a decade to catch the killer. Join Mike and Gibby as they discuss Meg Wellnitz-Appleton and Bill Meece. For years, their alibis stood up and prevented the authorities from moving forward against them. But when Bill got a divorce from his wife, his world turned upside down. Meg and Bill told differing stories, and it would be up to juries to decide who was telling the truth.You can help support the show at patreon.com/truecrimeallthetimeVisit the show's website at truecrimeallthetime.com for contact, merchandise, and donation informationAn Emash Digital productionSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Kate discusses what to watch this week including Real Housewives of Miami (Bravo), Cocaine Air: Smugglers at 30,000 Ft. (Netflix), Gilgo Beach Killer: The House of Secrets (Peacock), and American Thunder: NASCAR to Le Mans (Amazon Prime Video). Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: http://www.tiktok.com/itskatecasey Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of lovelustfridays, hosts Jake Deptula and Michele Locke, alongside producer Haley Gray, are joined by Heather Ashley of Big Mad True Crime and Kyle Ashley from Critical Incidents to discuss the tragic story of Emma Compton. They explore the harsh realities of domestic violence, delving into the emotional and legal hurdles survivors face as well as the systemic obstacles that often block justice. The discussion highlights investigative issues in Emma's case and emphasizes the need for improved communication between law enforcement and victims' families. Heather shares her expertise in criminal intelligence and violent crime reduction, while Kyle brings insights from his military and law enforcement background. Together, they reflect on the importance of advocacy, mental health awareness, and sharing survivor stories. The conversation also touches on the personal challenges of working in true crime media, including managing criticism and maintaining balance. Sponsors: IQBAR - Text "BIG" to 64000 to get 20% off all IQBAR products, plus get FREE shipping. "BIG" to 64000. ⁠Curehydration.com/bigmad⁠⁠ - Use code BIGMAD for 20% off your first order! Betterhelp.com/BIGMAD⁠⁠ - This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try and get 10% off your first month. Give your pup a fresh start this new year by letting them taste test a personalized meal plan with Ollie! Head to Ollie.com/BIGMAD tell them all about your dog, and use code BIGMAD to get 60% off your first box of meals when you subscribe today! Plus, they offer a Clean Bowl Guarantee on the first box, so if you're not completely satisfied, you'll get your money back.  Start your dog's new year off right with Ollie! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Bryan Kohberger, accused of perpetrating the University of Idaho quadruple murder, is set for his trial to begin August 11, 2025.  We previously covered this case in episode 248 and a series of episodes from 266-269.  This is an update episode with information from the most recent episode of Dateline that had all. new information and never before seen photos and evidence.  SOURCES:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amFi-bgTwJghttps://datelinetonight.com/the-terrible-night-on-king-road-dateline-reports-on-university-of-idaho-homicides-may-9-2025/https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/us/idaho-student-murders-home-demolished/index.htmlhttps://www.ibtimes.com/idaho-murders-update-suspect-may-have-messaged-victim-instagram-before-killing-roommates-3657970LINKS:Patreon:  https://www.patreon.com/killaforniapodPayPal:  https://www.paypal.coCashm/paypalme/killaforniapodMerchandise:  https://killaforniadreamingpodcast.threadless.com/Website:  https://killaforniadreamingpodcast.buzzsprout.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KillaforniaDreamingPodcastFacebook Group:  https://www.facebook.com/groups/1296620370450345/Facebook Page:  https://www.facebook.com/killaforniadreamingInstagram:  https://www.instagram.com/killaforniadreamingpod/?hl=enX:  https://twitter.com/killaforniapodEmail:  killaforniapod@gmail.comTikTok:  @killaforniadreamingpod Cash App:  $KDpodcast

FAN MAIL TEXT HOTLINE A sudden, tragic murder in an affluent Spokane, Washington neighborhood is linked to the disappearance of an oilfield worker in North Dakota. At the center of it all; a charismatic, flashy, and devious couple hellbent on screwing over every person they come in contact with. Recorded live with a packed house at the Sanctuary Events Center in Fargo, ND. Episode title submitted by: Jazmyn HVictims: Doug Carlisle, KC ClarkeLocations: North Dakota, WashingtonSpecial thanks to author CJ Wynn for contributing to this episode. Be sure to check out her new book Miles of Destruction: A True Story of Oil, Greed, Lust and MurderSupport the showhttps://linktr.ee/midwestmurderpod

"Mind Over Murder" hosts Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley discuss the mysterious case of D B Cooper with Darren Schaefer, the host of "The Cooper Vortex" podcast.  Dan "DB" Cooper, who successfully hijacked a Northwest Airlines passenger jet and parachuted into the dense forest of the Pacific Northwest. He was never caught, although a small amount of the $200,000 ransom was later recovered. This is Part 3 of 4 parts on the Dan "DB" Cooper case.CrimeCon:  We're going to CrimeCon again, folks! Join us in Denver for new merch, some MOM listener hangouts, and a lot of fun! Use the code MINDOVERMURDER to get 10% off your tickets between now and September! See you there!The Cooper Vortex Podcast:  https://thecoopervortex.podbean.com/October 2023 Popular Mechanics article--Newcomb:https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/airlines/a43298881/db-cooper-case-could-be-solved-dna/October 2023 Popular Mechanics article—Natale:https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a45639586/who-was-db-cooper/January 2024 Popular Mechanics article:https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a46332899/new-evidence-db-cooper-mystery/February 2024 Popular Mechanics article:https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a46788110/db-cooper-confession-new-evidence-identity/History.Com: https://www.history.com/articles/who-was-d-b-cooperFBI.GOV: https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/db-cooper-hijackingSeptember 2011 NPR: All Things Considered interview:https://www.npr.org/2011/09/25/140216653/skyjack-the-unsolved-case-of-d-b-coopers-escapeDB Cooper: https://dbcooperhijack.com/2019/01/04/d-b-cooper-cary-grant-and-the-1959-film-north-by-northwest/WTKR News 3: One year after development in Colonial Parkway Murders, where do things stand?https://www.wtkr.com/news/in-the-community/historic-triangle/one-year-after-development-in-colonial-parkway-murders-where-do-things-standWon't you help the Mind Over Murder podcast increase our visibility and shine the spotlight on the "Colonial Parkway Murders" and other unsolved cases? Contribute any amount you can here:https://www.gofundme.com/f/mind-over-murder-podcast-expenses?utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customerWTVR CBS News:  Colonial Parkway murders victims' families keep hope cases will be solved:https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/colonial-parkway-murders-update-april-19-2024WAVY TV 10 News:  New questions raised in Colonial Parkway murders:https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/new-questions-raised-in-colonial-parkway-murders/Alan Wade Wilmer, Sr. has been named as the killer of Robin Edwards and David Knobling in the Colonial Parkway Murders in September 1987, as well as the murderer of Teresa Howell in June 1989. He has also been linked to the April 1988 disappearance and likely murder of Keith Call and Cassandra Hailey, another pair in the Colonial Parkway Murders.13News Now investigates: A serial killer's DNA will not be entered into CODIS database:https://www.13newsnow.com/video/news/local/13news-now-investigates/291-e82a9e0b-38e3-4f95-982a-40e960a71e49WAVY TV 10 on the Colonial Parkway Murders Announcement with photos:https://www.wavy.com/news/crime/deceased-man-identified-as-suspect-in-decades-old-homicides/WTKR News 3https://www.wtkr.com/news/is-man-linked-to-one-of-the-colonial-parkway-murders-connected-to-the-other-casesVirginian Pilot: Who was Alan Wade Wilmer Sr.? Man suspected in two ‘Colonial Parkway' murders died alone in 2017https://www.pilotonline.com/2024/01/14/who-was-alan-wade-wilmer-sr-man-suspected-in-colonial-parkway-murders-died-alone-in-2017/Colonial Parkway Murders Facebook page with more than 18,000 followers: https://www.facebook.com/ColonialParkwayCaseYou can also participate in an in-depth discussion of the Colonial Parkway Murders here:https://earonsgsk.proboards.com/board/50/colonial-parkway-murdersMind Over Murder is proud to be a Spreaker Prime Podcaster:https://www.spreaker.comJoin the discussion on our Mind Over MurderColonial Parkway Murders website: https://colonialparkwaymurders.com Mind Over Murder Podcast website: https://mindovermurderpodcast.comPlease subscribe and rate us at your favorite podcast sites. Ratings and reviews are very important. Please share and tell your friends!We launch a new episode of "Mind Over Murder" every Monday morning, and a bonus episode every Thursday morning.Sponsors: Othram and DNAsolves.comContribute Your DNA to help solve cases: https://dnasolves.com/user/registerFollow "Mind Over Murder" on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MurderOverFollow Bill Thomas on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BillThomas56Follow "Colonial Parkway Murders" on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ColonialParkwayCase/Follow us on InstaGram:: https://www.instagram.com/colonialparkwaymurders/Check out the entire Crawlspace Media network at http://crawlspace-media.com/All rights reserved. Mind Over Murder, Copyright Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley, Another Dog Productions/Absolute Zero ProductionsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mind-over-murder--4847179/support.

On June 7, 2025, the defense team for Sean “Diddy” Combs submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian in support of its renewed motion for a mistrial in United States v. Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS). The defense argues that recent conduct by the prosecution constitutes clear prosecutorial misconduct, compromising Mr. Combs' right to a fair trial. The letter, filed via ECF, emphasizes that these actions warrant the granting of a mistrial to preserve the integrity of the proceedings.The defense contends that the cumulative effect of the government's behavior has irreparably tainted the jury and undermined the trial's fairness. While specific examples of the alleged misconduct are likely detailed within the full motion, this letter serves to formally reiterate the defense's position that the prosecution's actions are incompatible with due process. The defense urges the Court to take immediate corrective action to prevent further prejudice against Mr. Combs.to coontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.381.0.pdf

Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York Times

Former Danity Kane member Dawn Richard has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, accusing him of sexual abuse, harassment, and manipulation during her time under his management. Richard claims that Diddy groped her multiple times, threatened her, and once locked her in a car for two hours after a dispute. She also alleges that Diddy used his influence to control her career, offering opportunities based on submission to his demands. The lawsuit describes how he made degrading comments about her appearance and withheld parts of her performances when she resisted.Additionally, Richard claims to have witnessed instances of abuse toward other women, including observing drug-fueled parties and seeing Diddy choke his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. She also recalls seeing Diddy's former partner, Kim Porter, emerge from a studio with visible injuries. Richard's lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, though Diddy has vehemently denied the allegations. His legal team labeled the claims as fabricated and an attempt to gain money, especially considering Richard's continued collaboration with him over the years.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs: Former member of Danity Kane accuses Combs of sexual battery in new lawsuit | CNN

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

Carmen Bryan, known for her past relationship with Jay-Z during the late 1990s, has publicly criticized the rapper following recent allegations accusing him of raping a 13-year-old girl alongside Sean "Diddy" Combs. In her social media posts, Bryan condemned those who defend celebrities despite serious accusations, emphasizing the importance of standing for what is right over personal biases.She also referenced her own history with Jay-Z, highlighting the affair that occurred while she was engaged to rapper Nas, which contributed to a significant feud between the two artists.Bryan's comments come amid a lawsuit alleging that Jay-Z and Combs sexually assaulted a minor at an afterparty following the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. Both artists have denied the allegations, with Jay-Z labeling them as blackmail attempts. Bryan's remarks not only address the current accusations but also revisit past grievances, including her pregnancy during the affair and the subsequent public fallout, which were detailed in her memoir. Her statements have reignited discussions about the personal histories of those involved and the broader issue of accountability in the entertainment industry.(commercial at 7:59)to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Carmen Bryan, who got pregnant during nine-year affair with Jay-Z, breaks her silence after the rapper is accused of raping girl, 13 | Daily Mail Online

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

​In Case 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants have filed a Memorandum of Law opposing the plaintiff's amended motion for the pro hac vice admission of attorney Anthony Buzbee. Pro hac vice admission allows an out-of-state lawyer to participate in a specific case in a jurisdiction where they are not licensed to practice regularly. The defendants argue that Buzbee's admission should be denied due to concerns about his prior professional conduct, which they believe could negatively impact the proceedings. They emphasize the importance of maintaining the integrity of the court and ensuring that all participating attorneys adhere to the highest ethical standards.Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated that Buzbee's involvement is necessary for their case, especially considering the availability of other qualified counsel who are already licensed in the jurisdiction. They assert that granting the motion could set a concerning precedent, potentially allowing attorneys with questionable conduct records to participate in cases without proper scrutiny. The memorandum concludes by urging the court to carefully consider these factors and deny the amended motion for Buzbee's pro hac vice admission to uphold the court's standards and ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Federal prosecutors have filed a motion to exclude testimony from Conor McCourt, a former NYPD sergeant and forensic video analyst, whom Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense team intends to call as an expert witness. McCourt analyzed surveillance footage of an alleged 2016 assault involving Combs and concluded that the videos were distorted and not faithful representations of the events. The government contends that McCourt's testimony should be barred due to the defense's untimely and incomplete disclosure, which failed to meet the requirements set by Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Specifically, the defense did not provide a comprehensive summary of McCourt's opinions, his qualifications, or a list of prior cases where he testified as an expert, all of which were due by March 14, 2025. The government argues that this delay hindered its ability to prepare a rebuttal and prejudiced its caseBeyond procedural issues, prosecutors assert that McCourt's anticipated testimony lacks substantial probative value and could mislead the jury. They argue that his technical critiques—such as claims about video distortion and transcoding artifacts—are speculative and unlikely to assist jurors in understanding the evidence. Furthermore, the government warns that presenting McCourt as an expert may unduly influence the jury, giving his opinions more weight than warranted. They also note that McCourt's analysis includes videos not intended for presentation at trial, rendering parts of his testimony irrelevant. Consequently, the government urges the court to exclude McCourt's testimony entirely or, at the very least, limit it under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 702 to prevent confusion and ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.277.0.pdf

In its May 28, 2025 letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, the defense responded to the government's objections regarding several exhibits the defense intended to introduce during its cross-examination of the witness "Mia." The defense argued that the government's objections lacked merit and that the exhibits in question were both relevant and admissible. The letter emphasized that these materials were critical for challenging Mia's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies in her prior statements and demonstrating potential bias or motive, particularly in relation to her pending civil litigation and prior public statements.Additionally, the defense contended that excluding these exhibits would unfairly limit its ability to mount an effective cross-examination, violating Combs' constitutional right to confront his accuser. The letter urged the court to overrule the government's objections, stressing that the contested exhibits were essential to providing the jury with a full and accurate understanding of Mia's testimony and credibility. The defense maintained that these materials were not prejudicial or misleading, but rather necessary for the jury to evaluate the truthfulness and reliability of the prosecution's key witness.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.383.0.pdf

In this filing titled “Defendant Sean Combs's Additional Requests to Charge,” Combs's legal team submitted supplemental proposed jury instructions for Judge Subramanian to consider as the case approaches deliberations. The defense emphasized that these additional instructions were necessary to ensure the jury fully understood the legal standards governing the charges, particularly with respect to the government's burden of proof, the definitions of key terms under RICO and sex trafficking statutes, and the presumption of innocence afforded to the defendant. They argued that without these clarifying instructions, the jury risked being misled by the government's broad and potentially prejudicial narrative framing.Furthermore, the defense stressed that the proposed instructions were rooted in well-established case law and were essential to safeguarding Combs's constitutional rights during deliberations. The filing highlighted concerns that certain elements of the government's case—such as its reliance on character evidence and speculative inferences—could improperly sway the jury unless properly neutralized by clear guidance from the Court. The defense urged Judge Subramanian to adopt these additional charges in full to preserve the fairness and integrity of the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.388.0.pdf

In a gripping morning session, Jane Doe, the second alleged victim to testify, told jurors she was coerced into years of humiliating sexual acts orchestrated by Combs under a veil of manipulation and control. Fighting back tears, she read text messages in which she pleaded for the abuse to stop, including one that said, “It's been three years of me trying to f--- strangers. I'm tired.” The witness described a relationship that began romantically in 2021 but swiftly turned into a cycle of coercion, where Combs allegedly paid her rent and held financial sway over her. He allegedly forced her into drug-fueled “hotel nights” — exploitative sex parties involving third parties — despite her repeated objections. “I told him, ‘I'm not a porn star,'” she testified. “I didn't want to do it.”Jane further detailed how Combs used ecstasy to maintain control over her during extended sex sessions with male escorts and strangers, which he directed for his own gratification. She described the physical toll of these encounters — exhaustion, recurrent urinary tract infections, and ongoing trauma. According to Jane, the coercion was relentless, her financial dependence leveraged against her resistance. The morning's testimony reinforced the prosecution's portrayal of Combs as a manipulative abuser operating behind a facade of glamour and wealth, while also underscoring the emotional and physical damage allegedly suffered by his accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

In a gripping morning session, Jane Doe, the second alleged victim to testify, told jurors she was coerced into years of humiliating sexual acts orchestrated by Combs under a veil of manipulation and control. Fighting back tears, she read text messages in which she pleaded for the abuse to stop, including one that said, “It's been three years of me trying to f--- strangers. I'm tired.” The witness described a relationship that began romantically in 2021 but swiftly turned into a cycle of coercion, where Combs allegedly paid her rent and held financial sway over her. He allegedly forced her into drug-fueled “hotel nights” — exploitative sex parties involving third parties — despite her repeated objections. “I told him, ‘I'm not a porn star,'” she testified. “I didn't want to do it.”Jane further detailed how Combs used ecstasy to maintain control over her during extended sex sessions with male escorts and strangers, which he directed for his own gratification. She described the physical toll of these encounters — exhaustion, recurrent urinary tract infections, and ongoing trauma. According to Jane, the coercion was relentless, her financial dependence leveraged against her resistance. The morning's testimony reinforced the prosecution's portrayal of Combs as a manipulative abuser operating behind a facade of glamour and wealth, while also underscoring the emotional and physical damage allegedly suffered by his accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

This is shaping to be the maddest thing we have ever done. Jack has got a video from a genuine bank robber from the UK for us. He's promised to give a certain person in the news a 'Glam Up' via his incredible sketch artist ability and our first guest announce is derailed buy, yes, a legal issue. Comedy Republic. 19TH june. only a few tix left.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.