Podcasts about True crime

In the initial hours after Bryan Kohberger's arrest, there was a frantic dash to try to find out as much information about him as possible. During that dash, those of us who were following along were able to get a glimpse of an instagram account that allegedly belonged to Bryan Kohberger. That same account was also following and interacting with Madison's account. A few hours later and that account was purged.In this episode, we hear from the Goncalves family who also saw that account and not only saw it, but they took screenshots as well. With many questions surrounding the motive in this case and the connection between the victims and the alleged murderer still in the air, could this be the glue that binds Bryan Kohberger? Let's dive in and give it a look. (commercial at 7:18)to contact me:bobycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho student murders suspect Bryan Kohberger followed victims on Instagram, says family - CBS News

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has firmly denied allegations involving a second victim in his purported sex trafficking activities. They assert that these claims are baseless and part of a broader effort to tarnish Combs' reputation. His attorneys emphasize that the accusations lack credible evidence and are driven by individuals seeking financial gain or media attention.Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, remains in custody after being denied bail. His defense team is actively preparing for the upcoming trial, maintaining that the allegations are unfounded. They argue that the prosecution's case relies on unsubstantiated claims and that Combs will be exonerated once all evidence is presented in court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's lawyers slam claims of a SECOND victim in alleged sex trafficking operation | Daily Mail Online

This filing, submitted on behalf of Sean Combs and his co-defendants in the case English v. Combs et al., opposes the plaintiff's renewed request for a 60-day extension to secure a third set of legal counsel. The defense argues that the plaintiff has already cycled through two legal teams—both of whom withdrew due to serious breakdowns in the attorney-client relationship, including what they described as “self-destructive conduct,” refusal to follow legal advice, and irreconcilable differences. The filing outlines a timeline of delays and extensions already granted, emphasizing that the plaintiff's behavior has repeatedly stalled progress and wasted the court's and defendants' time and resources.The defendants urge the court to deny any further delay, asserting that the plaintiff's complaint is fatally flawed and that she is unlikely to retain new counsel willing to continue litigating what they call “baseless claims.” They argue that granting another extension would prolong an already mismanaged case that has made little progress nearly a year after being filed. Moreover, the defense indicates it is prepared to file a motion to dismiss all eight of the plaintiff's claims with prejudice and warns that continued adjournments serve only to avoid scrutiny of the case's legal shortcomings. Ultimately, the defense calls for the case to move forward without further delay, with or without new representation for the plaintiff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.624352.74.0.pdf

A cult in suburbs?/A Lady Gaga Satanic terror attack/Did the timeline erase an episode of Dead Rabbit Radio?   Patreon (Get ad-free episodes, Patreon Discord Access, and more!) https://www.patreon.com/user?u=18482113 PayPal Donation Link https://tinyurl.com/mrxe36ph MERCH STORE!!! https://tinyurl.com/y8zam4o2 Amazon Wish List https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/28CIOGSFRUXAD?ref_=wl_share   Help Promote Dead Rabbit! Dual Flyer https://i.imgur.com/OhuoI2v.jpg "As Above" Flyer https://i.imgur.com/yobMtUp.jpg “Alien Flyer” By TVP VT U https://imgur.com/gallery/aPN1Fnw “QR Code Flyer” by Finn https://imgur.com/a/aYYUMAh   Links: EP 10 - Chop Shop (Lady Gaga episode) https://deadrabbitradio.libsyn.com/ep-10-chop-shop EP 62 - Penis Worship (Lady Gaga episode) https://deadrabbitradio.libsyn.com/ep-62-penis-worship EP 634 - The Lady Gaga/Oreo Cookie/9-11 Conspiracy! (Lady Gaga episode) https://deadrabbitradio.libsyn.com/ep-634-the-lady-gagaoreo-cookie9-11-conspiracy EP 1423 - Did Lady Gaga Cast A Spell On SNL? (Lady Gaga episode) https://deadrabbitradio.libsyn.com/ep-1423-did-lady-gaga-cast-a-spell-on-snl EP 1325 - Shhh (Only Seth Macfarlane episode) https://deadrabbitradio.libsyn.com/ep-1325-shhh EP 429 - Is Bill Gates The Antichrist? https://deadrabbitradio.libsyn.com/ep-429-is-bill-gates-the-antichrist Lady Gaga bomb plot targeted LGBTQ crowd, third person planned ‘satanist ritual' child killing, Brazil authorities say https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/04/americas/brazil-lady-gaga-bomb-plot-rio-intl-latam Brazil Police Say They Thwarted Anti-LGBTQ+ Terror Attack at a Lady Gaga Concert https://www.them.us/story/lady-gaga-brazil-terror-attack 2 charged in plot to bomb Lady Gaga's massive free concert in Brazil https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/04/bomb-plot-lady-gaga-brazil-00325991 Brazilian police say they prevented a bomb attack at the free Lady Gaga concert https://www.npr.org/2025/05/04/nx-s1-5386457/lady-gaga-copacabana-beach-brazil-free-concert Foiled Brazilian terrorist plot against Lady Gaga gets sinister 'satanist' twist https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/05/07/foiled-brazilian-terrorist-plot-against-lady-gaga-gets-sinister-satanist-twist Alleged Threat to Lady Gaga Brazil Concert Came From Rising Type of ‘Nihilistic' Hate Group https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/lady-gaga-brazil-nihilistic-hate-network-1235331701/ Foiled Terror Attack at Brazil Concert A Warning For LGBTQ+ Events Worldwide https://globalextremism.org/post/foiled-terror-attack-at-brazil-concert/ Alleged Threat to Lady Gaga Brazil Concert Came From Rising Type of ‘Nihilistic' Hate Group https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/lady-gaga-brazil-nihilistic-hate-network-1235331701/ Manchester Arena bombing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Arena_bombing November 2015 Paris attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2015_Paris_attacks TIL that Seth Macfarlane was supposed to be on one of the planes that crashed into the world trade center, but missed the flight because he was hungover from the previous night. https://www.reddit.com/r/familyguy/comments/1featoi/til_that_seth_macfarlane_was_supposed_to_be_on/ Family Guy: Live in Vegas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Guy:_Live_in_Vegas   ---------------------------------------------- Logo Art By Ash Black Opening Song: "Atlantis Attacks" Middle Song: “Boys Don't Cry” Closing Song: "Bella Royale" Music By Simple Rabbitron 3000 created by Eerbud Thanks to Chris K, Founder Of The Golden Rabbit Brigade Dead Rabbit Archivist Some Weirdo On Twitter AKA Jack YouTube Champ: Stewart Meatball Reddit Champ: TheLast747 The Haunted Mic Arm provided by Chyme Chili Forever Fluffle: Cantillions, Samson, Gregory Gilbertson, Jenny The Cat Discord Mods: Mason   http://www.DeadRabbit.com Email: DeadRabbitRadio@gmail.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/DeadRabbitRadio Facebook: www.Facebook.com/DeadRabbitRadio TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@deadrabbitradio Dead Rabbit Radio Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/DeadRabbitRadio/ Paranormal News Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/ParanormalNews/ Mailing Address Jason Carpenter PO Box 1363 Hood River, OR 97031 Paranormal, Conspiracy, and True Crime news as it happens! Jason Carpenter breaks the stories they'll be talking about tomorrow, assuming the world doesn't end today. All Contents Of This Podcast Copyright Jason Carpenter 2018 - 2025  

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

​Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a motion to exclude a 2016 surveillance video from his upcoming federal trial, arguing that the footage—released by CNN in 2024—has been altered and is not a reliable representation of events. The video depicts Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles. Combs, who has previously apologized for his actions in the video, is currently facing charges including racketeering, sex trafficking, and coercion. His lawyers claim that the video was manipulated, with distortions and speed alterations that exaggerate his actions, and that the original tape was destroyed, making it inadmissible as evidence. ​The defense has requested a hearing to allow expert testimony on the video's alleged inaccuracies. They argue that the government's inability to authenticate the footage, due to the destruction of the original and the presence of technical inconsistencies, renders it inadmissible. Prosecutors have previously used the video to argue for Combs' detention, citing the threat he poses to women. Combs remains in custody at MDC-Brooklyn, with his trial scheduled to begin on May 5, 2025.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy requests 'distorted' Cassie videos not be shown at trial

On the fourth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura faced intense cross-examination from the defense. Attorney Anna Estevao sought to portray Ventura as a consenting participant in their tumultuous relationship, highlighting text messages and emails that suggested mutual affection and willingness to engage in the so-called "freak-offs"—drug-fueled group sex encounters central to the prosecution's case. The defense emphasized instances where Ventura appeared to plan these events, referencing messages where she expressed anticipation and involvement in organizing them. They also delved into her past relationships, including with rapper Kid Cudi and actor Michael B. Jordan, to suggest mutual jealousy and complexity in her relationship with Combs.Ventura, who is currently eight months pregnant, maintained that her participation in these events was driven by fear and manipulation. She testified that Combs exerted control over her, using threats and violence to coerce her into compliance. When questioned about their drug use, Ventura acknowledged that they both used substances but asserted that Combs became angry if she used drugs without him, indicating a controlling dynamic. She also recounted incidents of violence, including an episode where Combs allegedly threw a wooden hanger at her friend, leading to the end of that friendship. Despite the defense's efforts to challenge her credibility, Ventura remained composed, reiterating that her actions were often a result of coercion and fear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 15, 2025 - Day 4 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On the third day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura delivered harrowing testimony detailing years of alleged abuse during their 11-year relationship. She recounted being coerced into drug-fueled sexual encounters, termed "freak-offs," often involving male escorts and filmed by Combs for blackmail purposes. Ventura described suffering physical injuries, including a 2013 incident where Combs threw a vase at her, resulting in a cut to her eyebrow. She also testified about a 2016 assault captured on hotel surveillance footage, where Combs was seen attacking her in a hallway. Despite settling a civil lawsuit in 2023 for $20 million, Ventura chose to testify in the criminal trial to confront the truth and end her silence.Ventura further alleged that Combs raped her in 2018 after their breakup, during a visit to her home following a lunch meeting intended for closure. She described the assault as swift and traumatic, stating she cried and said "no," but Combs proceeded regardless. Additionally, Ventura testified about the psychological toll of the abuse, revealing she suffered from PTSD and had contemplated suicide before seeking therapy in 2023. Her testimony also included claims that Combs threatened others, including rapper Kid Cudi, and used explicit videos to manipulate and control her. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains in custody; if convicted, he faces up to life in prison.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 14, 2025 - Day 3 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNshow less

From the archives: 3-9-23As we continue to slowly make our way closer to Bryan Kohberger's trial, things are certainly in motion behind the scenes at the judicial level. One of those moves that we have seen take place recently was the request to add another lawyer to Bryan Kohberger's team. This was a request that was approved by Judge Marshall and another signal that this case will be tried as a a capital murder case.Let's dive in!(commercial at 6:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's Lawyer Is Calling for Backup (newsweek.com)

From the archives: 5-25-23Bryan Kohberger has been indicted for the murder of the Moscow four. However, it has been quite the journey to get to this point. From twists and turns in the case to new revelations, we have seen it all in the past seven months.In this episode we take a look at where things stand.(commercial at 11:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho college killings, suspect Bryan Kohberger: what we know | Idaho Statesman

From the archives: 5-25-23Bryan Kohberger has been indicted for the murder of the Moscow four. However, it has been quite the journey to get to this point. From twists and turns in the case to new revelations, we have seen it all in the past seven months.In this episode we take a look at where things stand.(commercial at 11:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho college killings, suspect Bryan Kohberger: what we know | Idaho Statesman

Newly released bodycam footage taken during an incident at the roommates house on September 1st shows the house filled with people while the roommates are not home. With more context it starts to become a lot more clear that the task ahead of the investigators remains massive, as the home was obviously a well trafficked, often visited residence that has now become a crime scene.(commercial at 7:18)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bodycam shows Moscow police responding to unrelated noise complaint at students home months before murders | The Independent

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the privacy of the jury room at the Victorian Supreme Court in Morwell, 12 men and women will debate if Erin Patterson had a motive to murder her four elderly relatives. She’s pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder. Find out more about The Front podcast here. You can read about this story and more on The Australian's website or on The Australian’s app. This episode of The Front is presented by Claire Harvey, produced by Kristen Amiet and edited by Tiffany Dimmack. Our team includes Lia Tsamoglou, Joshua Burton, Stephanie Coombes and Jasper Leak, who also composed our music. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Tonight, we sit down with Scott Davis, psychic medium and a police officer to talk about when true crime and the paranormal collide. From haunted homicide scenes to spiritual messages from murder victims, this episode dives into the eerie intersection of unsolved mysteries and the supernatural.  You know, True Crime with a Paranormal Twist Phantom Forensics: https://phantomforensics.com/Website: https://scottythenjmedium.com/ Check out the merch, blog, buy the book and so much more! mysteriesmayhemandmerlot.net WHERE'S WINNIE! - https://linktr.ee/WinnieSchrader Check out Winnie's Linktree for everything Winnie! From merch for Paranormal 60, Love+Lotus Tarot & Mysteries, Mayhem & Merlot to digital designs with WS Media & more! IF YOU NEED HELP PLEASE CONTACT Call or Text to 988 Chat online at https://988lifeline.org/ SUPPORT THE ADVERTISERS THAT SUPPORT THIS SHOW Zelmin's Minty Mouth - Get more info and 15% off at www.Zelmins.com/P60Factor Meals - Get 50% off your first order & Free Shipping at www.FactorMeals.com/factorpodcast and use code: FactorPodcast at checkout Mint Mobile - To get your new wireless plan for just $15 bucks a month, and get the plan shipped to your door for FREE, go to www.MintMobile.com/P60Shadow Zine - https://shadowzine.com/ Kudos to Bart-El for making the wonderful intro vid Tip of the Cap to Jay Juliano for creating a perfect melodic interlude to the podcastPLEASE RATE & REVIEW MYSTERIES, MAYHEM & MERLOT PODCAST WHEREVER YOU LISTEN! true crime stories to fall asleep to, true crime podcast, haunted crime scenes, paranormal true crime, the graveyard shift, dalen spratt, ghost brothers, psychic detective, supernatural investigations, unsolved mysteries, real ghost stories, creepy true crime, cold case files, paranormal encounters, true crime and the paranormal, ghost evidence, eerie investigations, murder mysteries, spooky stories, paranormal podcast#truecrimestoriestofallasleepto, #truecrimepodcast, #hauntedcrimescenes, #paranormaltruecrime, #thegraveyardshift, #dalenspratt, #ghostbrothers, #psychicdetective, #supernaturalinvestigations, #unsolvedmysteries, #realghoststories, #creepytruecrime, #coldcasefiles, #paranormalencounters, #truecrimeandtheparanormal, #ghostevidence, #eerieinvestigations, #murdermysteries, #spookystories, #paranormalpodcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On October 1st 1973, workers close to Battersea power station found the nude body of 16 year old Jacqueline Johns by a railway siding. She had attended a wedding two days before her body was found. She never made it home. Despite 52 years passing, her murder has never been solved.Important information provided by: Contemporary reports: https://www.findmypast.co.uk/homehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13709207/Inside-brutal-murder-16-year-old-girl-one-Londons-oldest-cold-cases-living-memory-Jacqueline-Johns-naked-close-Battersea-Power-Station-killer-never-50-years-family-believe-KNOW-did-it.htmlhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/29805404/crucial-clue-could-finally-solve-murder/https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/32434344/gruesome-murder-girl-vital-clue/Music by: dl-sounds.comFollow the Unseen Podcast on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-unseen-podcast/id1318473466?uo=4Follow the Unseen Podcast on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0xWK7Mu3bTP6oziZvxrwSK?si=QxvyPkZ2TdCDscnfxyeRawJoin our Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/unseenpodFollow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/theunseenpodFollow us on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/theunseenpod/Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theunseenpod?fan_landing=trueSubscribe to 10 Minute True Crime: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/10-minute-true-crime/id1591474862

DescriptionDuring her testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, Cassie Ventura detailed a decade-long relationship marked by control, abuse, and coercion. She described how Combs exerted dominance over her personal and professional life, dictating aspects such as her clothing choices and daily interactions. Ventura recounted being subjected to physical violence for minor infractions, including being beaten for making "the wrong face." She also testified about being forced to carry a firearm for Combs, which she believed was intended to intimidate her .Ventura's testimony included accounts of being compelled to participate in "freak-offs," which she described as drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties involving male escorts, orchestrated and filmed by Combs. She alleged that during these events, she was forced into degrading acts, such as being urinated on, and was left to clean up afterward. Ventura expressed feelings of humiliation and worthlessness, stating that she engaged in these acts out of fear and a sense of obligation. She also recounted a 2016 incident, captured on surveillance video, where Combs assaulted her in a hotel hallway. Throughout her testimony, Ventura emphasized the pervasive control and abuse she endured, which she said led her to abandon her music career .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 13, 2025 - Day 2 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

In the case United States v. Combs, Inc., 24-cr-542 (AS), the defense submitted a letter to Judge Subramanian further supporting their requested edits to the Court's proposed jury charge. The defense elaborated on certain issues that were referenced in comment bubbles within their proposed edits, which are aimed at modifying the jury instructions to better align with their legal arguments. These proposed edits highlight key areas where the defense believes the current jury charge may mislead or improperly influence the jury's decision-making process.Additionally, the defense also addressed objections to the government's redline edits, which likely included the prosecution's own proposed modifications to the jury instructions. The letter emphasized specific points of contention where the defense felt the prosecution's edits were either incomplete or insufficient in ensuring that the jury received a fair and accurate legal framework for deliberation. The correspondence from the defense represents a critical step in refining the instructions that the jury will follow when ultimately deciding the outcome of the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.421.0.pdf

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

In a letter submitted via ECF to Judge Arun Subramanian, attorney Robert Balin, representing a coalition of major media outlets—including The Associated Press, ABC News, NBC News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CBS News, NPR, Reuters, and others—raised concerns over the government's failure to provide timely public access to exhibits introduced during the testimony of the pseudonymous witness known as “Jane” in United States v. Combs. The government had previously assured both the Court and the News Organizations that such access would be granted in a manner consistent with open court proceedings and First Amendment protections.However, the letter asserts that those assurances were not honored, and the media was effectively prevented from reviewing exhibits contemporaneously with the witness's testimony. The News Organizations argue that this delay undermines both the principles of transparency and the public's constitutional right to observe judicial proceedings in real time. They request that the Court ensure immediate access to all future exhibits admitted into evidence, including those associated with sensitive or pseudonymous witnesses, barring any compelling and legally justified reason for delay.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Combs Trial - Letter re Delays re Jane Doe Exhibits 4913-4050-8751 v.2

From the archives: 2-3-23People magazine has had several sources provide them with information throughout the investigation and now according to their sources, they say that Bryan Kohberger was on the Idaho University campus multiple times and according to the students, his behavior was odd at best.Let's dive in!(commercial at 7:39)to contact me:bobbycapuccci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Visited Idaho Student Union Before Murders — and Was 'the Type to Stare': Witnesses (msn.com)

One of the strongest pieces of evidence that we have seen that the prosecution has collected against Bryan Kohberger is the DNA on the knife sheath that was traced back to him through his father. Yet there are some who are speculating that Bryan Kohberger left the sheath on purpose.In this episode, we take a look at some of that speculation and if there is any evidence that would prove it.(commercial at 8:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murder suspect may have left sheath at crime scene in 'clever move,' expert claims | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger, accused of the November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, is scheduled for a court appearance today in Boise, Idaho. His defense team has filed motions to suppress key evidence, arguing that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) violated his constitutional rights. They contend that law enforcement's application of IGG, which involves using DNA from public genealogy databases to identify potential suspects, was conducted without proper warrants, rendering the subsequent evidence inadmissible. Additionally, the defense claims that search warrants for Kohberger's phone, car, and residences were obtained through misleading information presented to the court.In a broader strategy to remove the death penalty as a potential sentence, Kohberger's attorneys have previously argued that capital punishment violates contemporary standards of decency and international treaties against prisoner torture. They also assert that prolonged periods on death row constitute cruel and unusual punishment. However, these arguments were rejected by the court in November 2024, allowing the death penalty to remain on the table if Kohberger is convicted.   The outcome of today's hearing could significantly impact the admissibility of critical evidence and the overall trajectory of the case as it moves toward trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger looks to dodge death penalty with Lori Vallow's playbook | Fox News

Why didn't the suspect, Brian Kohberger kill all of the inhabitants of the house? It is a question that has been asked since the very beginning of the the investigation and since the release of the affadavit and the revelation that Bryan Kohberger came face to face with one of the surviving roommates, the question is once again being asked.In this episode, we hear from John Kelly, a criminal profiler, who discusses what he thinks happened and why the two surviving roommates were spared the same fate as the others.(commercial at 7:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Stunning new Idaho murder detail shows killer appeared to want to 'get out of dodge' | Fox News

The Prosecution:   During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The  Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNN

Israel Florez, a former security supervisor at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, testified on the first day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial and described a 2016 incident involving Combs and Cassie Ventura. Florez told the jury he witnessed security footage showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura in a hotel hallway. According to his account, the footage captured Combs throwing a glass object at Ventura, dragging her by her hair, kicking her while she was on the ground, and later slamming her into a wall near the elevator. Florez said the footage disturbed him enough that he reported it to hotel management and saved a copy, fearing the original would be deleted.Florez further testified that Combs later confronted him about the tape and attempted to silence him by offering a bribe. He said Combs handed him an envelope filled with cash and instructed him to get rid of the footage. Florez refused and claimed he interpreted the encounter as an effort to cover up the incident. The government presented this testimony as part of a broader narrative that Combs used violence and then relied on money and influence to conceal it. The surveillance footage itself — previously leaked to the public — was played in full for the jury, reinforcing the prosecution's claim that this was not an isolated outburst but part of a larger pattern of coercive behavior.Daniel Phillip, a former male escort, took the stand as the second witness on Day One of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial. Phillip testified that he was hired multiple times to engage in sexual acts with Cassie Ventura while Combs allegedly watched. According to his account, the encounters were arranged through intermediaries working for Combs, and he was paid thousands of dollars in cash after each meeting. Phillip said the settings were often private hotels or residences, and that the sessions were not casual — they were specific, orchestrated, and in some cases involved explicit instructions from Combs regarding what was to take place.Phillip also testified that over time, the nature of the encounters became more controlled. He recalled moments when Ventura appeared detached or uncomfortable and described the environment as one where Combs held clear dominance. He told the jury that he was warned not to speak about the arrangements, and that the overall experience felt more like an assignment than a consensual interaction. Prosecutors used his testimony to support the core of their trafficking charges — arguing that Combs not only arranged for sex acts to occur, but financially facilitated them in a manner that meets the threshold of federal sex trafficking statutes. The defense, meanwhile, worked to undermine Phillip's credibility, implying he had personal motives and highlighting the consensual framing of adult relationships. Still, Phillip's account added a layer of specificity to the government's claim that Combs used his wealth and status to structure and control exploitative sexual scenarios.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Male escort was paid 'thousands of dollars' to have sex with Cassie while Diddy watched, he testifies on day 1 of trial

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

Send us a textHave you ever known someone who is a bit off? It could be a boss, co-worker, or your significant other. It can start with someone too good to be true, filled with charm and fake empathy. Then, they begin to show their true colors by controlling, manipulating, and destroying your life, or worse, ending it. Well, today we are going to be talking about psychopaths and how we can hopefully identify the red flags and protect ourselves from these predators. My guest on the show, Kerrie Droban, is an expert in psychopathy, studying this phenomenon, being recognized as an expert consultant on criminal pathology, and writing her newest book, Surviving a Psychopath: In Court. In Life. In “Love.” Kerrie Droban is a bestselling author, lawyer, public speaker, true crime television host and journalist seen on Netflix, 20/20, and ID TV, and host of her own podcast, Crime Stands Still.Kerrie draws on her personal experience being in relationships with partners who exhibited psychopathic traits and being a capitol defense attorney representing inmates on death row for years.Please enjoy part one of my interview with Kerrie Droban that I guarantee will send chills up your spine and give you some diagnostic tools to help you recognize a psychopath before it's too late.   In today's episode we discuss:·      Kerrie Droban being the original ‘spy kid' having both parents as CIA operatives and spending her youth living in Africa.·      How she balances being a bestselling author, lawyer, public speaker, true crime television host seen on Netflix, 20/20, and ID TV, and host of her own podcast, Crime Stands Still.·      How she suggests others break into show business.·      What is the definition of a psychopath, and how many has she known? ·      Are all psychopaths predators?·      How do we spot the traits of a psychopath, and why do we sometimes choose to ignore them?·      Why do humans choose to ignore their intuition?·      Gavin de Becker's book, The Gift of Fear. All of this and more on today's episode of the Cops and Writers podcast.Please visit Kerrie's website to learn more about her and her newest book, Surviving a Psychopath: In Court. In Life. In “Love.”Check out the new Cops and Writers YouTube channel!Check out my newest book, The Good Collar (Michael Quinn Vigilante Justice Series Book 1)!!!!!Enjoy the Cops and Writers book series.Please visit the Cops and Writers website.What would you do if you lost the one you loved the most? How far would you go to quench your thirst for vengeance?https://a.co/d/2UsJPbaSupport the show

In today's episode, we talk about a major case update out of Pennsylvania.This podcast was made possible by www.labrottiecreations.com Check out their merchandise and specifically their fun pop pet art custom pieces made from photos of your very own pets. Use the promo code CRIMEXS for 20% off a fun, brightly colored, happy piece of art of your own pet at their site.Music in this episode was licensed for True Crime XS. Our theme song is No Scars from slip.fmYou can reach us at our website truecrimexs.com and you can leave us a voice message at 252-365-5593. Find us most anywhere with @truecrimexsThanks for listening. Please like and subscribe if you want to hear more and you can come over to patreon.com/truecrimexs and check out what we've got going on there if you'd like to donate to fund future True Crime XS road trip investigations and FOIA requests. We also have some merchandise up at Teepublic http://tee.pub/lic/mZUXW1MOYxMSources:www.namus.govwww.thecharleyproject.comwww.newspapers.comFindlaw.comVarious News Sources Mentioned by NameAd Information:New Era Caps: https://zen.ai/dWeCYLHxxANOaZ6NcKocEwLiquid IV: Link: https://zen.ai/45lYmDnWl1Z3cR66LBX5mAZencastr: Link: https://zen.ai/SFkD99OGWGNz_plc2c_Yaw

The New York Post has reported viewing videos from Sean "Diddy" Combs' parties that allegedly depict explicit activities involving guests and hired performers. These recordings are said to show sexual acts and suggestive behavior, raising concerns about potential exploitation and misconduct at these events.The content of these videos has led to further scrutiny of Combs' personal conduct and the nature of his gatherings. While the Post has not released the videos publicly, their descriptions have contributed to the ongoing discussions and legal considerations surrounding Combs' actions and the broader implications for the entertainment industry.In this episode, we dive in!(commercial at 9:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy mixed A-list parties with 'Freak Off' sex shows: tapesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prosecutors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial have encountered a significant challenge: they are unable to locate a key witness, identified as "Victim-3." This witness was expected to provide crucial testimony regarding allegations that Combs coerced her into sexual acts. During court proceedings on May 7, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey informed the judge that both the witness and her attorney have been unresponsive, and there's uncertainty about her appearance even if subpoenaed. This development raises concerns about the prosecution's ability to present a comprehensive case.Despite this setback, the prosecution plans to proceed with testimonies from other accusers, including Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The absence of Victim-3's testimony could impact the prosecution's strategy, but they remain committed to presenting the available evidence. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, and has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues as both sides prepare for opening statements scheduled for May 12.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' prosecutors admit they may go to trial without key witnessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Vinnie Politan analyzes where Bryan Kohberger allegedly went after the Idaho student murders and where the murder weapon might be.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #BryanKohberger here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/bryan-kohberger/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

Author and advocate Ashley Spence joins "Mind Over Murder" co-hosts Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley to discuss her new book "Silent Witness: How DNA Uncovered the Truth and Empowered My Healing."  Ashley, a sexual assault survivor herself, founded the DNA Justice Project to advocate how forensic DNA can change lives, transform justice and prevent crimes before they happen. This bonus episode of "Mind Over Murder"originally ran on March 3, 2025.CrimeCon:  We're going to CrimeCon again, folks! Join us in Denver for new merch, some MOM listener hangouts, and a lot of fun! Use the code MINDOVERMURDER to get 10% off your tickets between now and September! See you there!Goodreads:  Silent Witness: How DNA Uncovered the Truth and Empowered My Healinghttps://www.goodreads.com/book/show/222721460-silent-witnessDNA Justice Project:https://www.dnajusticeproject.org/RAINN:  Together, we will create a world free from sexual violence.https://rainn.org/WTKR News 3: One year after development in Colonial Parkway Murders, where do things stand?https://www.wtkr.com/news/in-the-community/historic-triangle/one-year-after-development-in-colonial-parkway-murders-where-do-things-standWon't you help the Mind Over Murder podcast increase our visibility and shine the spotlight on the "Colonial Parkway Murders" and other unsolved cases? Contribute any amount you can here:https://www.gofundme.com/f/mind-over-murder-podcast-expenses?utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customerWTVR CBS News:  Colonial Parkway murders victims' families keep hope cases will be solved:https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/colonial-parkway-murders-update-april-19-2024WAVY TV 10 News:  New questions raised in Colonial Parkway murders:https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/new-questions-raised-in-colonial-parkway-murders/Alan Wade Wilmer, Sr. has been named as the killer of Robin Edwards and David Knobling in the Colonial Parkway Murders in September 1987, as well as the murderer of Teresa Howell in June 1989. He has also been linked to the April 1988 disappearance and likely murder of Keith Call and Cassandra Hailey, another pair in the Colonial Parkway Murders.13News Now investigates: A serial killer's DNA will not be entered into CODIS database:https://www.13newsnow.com/video/news/local/13news-now-investigates/291-e82a9e0b-38e3-4f95-982a-40e960a71e49WAVY TV 10 on the Colonial Parkway Murders Announcement with photos:https://www.wavy.com/news/crime/deceased-man-identified-as-suspect-in-decades-old-homicides/WTKR News 3https://www.wtkr.com/news/is-man-linked-to-one-of-the-colonial-parkway-murders-connected-to-the-other-casesVirginian Pilot: Who was Alan Wade Wilmer Sr.? Man suspected in two ‘Colonial Parkway' murders died alone in 2017https://www.pilotonline.com/2024/01/14/who-was-alan-wade-wilmer-sr-man-suspected-in-colonial-parkway-murders-died-alone-in-2017/Colonial Parkway Murders Facebook page with more than 18,000 followers: https://www.facebook.com/ColonialParkwayCaseYou can also participate in an in-depth discussion of the Colonial Parkway Murders here:https://earonsgsk.proboards.com/board/50/colonial-parkway-murdersMind Over Murder is proud to be a Spreaker Prime Podcaster:https://www.spreaker.comJoin the discussion on our Mind Over MurderColonial Parkway Murders website: https://colonialparkwaymurders.com Mind Over Murder Podcast website: https://mindovermurderpodcast.comPlease subscribe and rate us at your favorite podcast sites. Ratings and reviews are very important. Please share and tell your friends!We launch a new episode of "Mind Over Murder" every Monday morning, and a bonus episode every Thursday morning.Sponsors: Othram and DNAsolves.comContribute Your DNA to help solve cases: https://dnasolves.com/user/registerFollow "Mind Over Murder" on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MurderOverFollow Bill Thomas on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BillThomas56Follow "Colonial Parkway Murders" on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ColonialParkwayCase/Follow us on InstaGram:: https://www.instagram.com/colonialparkwaymurders/Check out the entire Crawlspace Media network at http://crawlspace-media.com/All rights reserved. Mind Over Murder, Copyright Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley, Another Dog Productions/Absolute Zero ProductionsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mind-over-murder--4847179/support.

The state has released over 60 sealed warrants in the investigation into Bryan Kohberger, that give us a glimpse at what the investigators have been up to behind the scenes, even before Bryan Kohberger was arrested.In this episode, we take a closer look at some of those warrants that were filed prior to Bryan Kohberger's arrest and what they could be telling us about the murder weapon.(commercial at 10:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Case: Is This the Weapon Used to Kill Idaho Students? | Inside Edition

In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger's trial for the alleged murders of four University of Idaho students, his defense team has highlighted several rumors circulating within Latah County that could potentially bias the jury pool. These include unverified claims that Kohberger had used a fake name to meet women, that he had been terminated from a teaching assistant position due to behavioral issues, and that he had a history of drug use. Additionally, there were speculations about his alleged involvement in other unsolved crimes, purportedly odd behavior during his time as a graduate student, and supposed comments he made about his ability to commit a perfect crime. The defense argues that such pervasive rumors, lacking substantiated evidence, have created a prejudicial environment that could impede Kohberger's right to a fair trial. They contend that the widespread dissemination of these unverified claims has tainted the local jury pool, making it challenging to select impartial jurors who have not been influenced by pretrial publicity. This situation underscores the complexities of ensuring a fair judicial process in high-profile cases where public opinion may be swayed by uncorroborated information.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

​In the case identified as CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the execution of a Pennsylvania search warrant at 119 Lamsden Drive, Albrightsville, PA, as well as statements he made during that operation. Kohberger's defense argues that the search warrant was invalid due to alleged reckless or intentional omissions of material facts in the supporting affidavit. They contend that these omissions led to a lack of probable cause, rendering the search unconstitutional. Additionally, the defense asserts that law enforcement's failure to properly "knock and announce" their presence violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights, and that any statements he made during the search should be suppressed as they were obtained without a Miranda warningIn response, the State maintains that the search was conducted under a valid warrant issued by a Pennsylvania court, based on substantial probable cause. They argue that the affidavit supporting the warrant was sufficient and did not omit any material information that would invalidate the warrant. The State also contends that the "knock and announce" procedure was appropriately followed, and that Kohberger's statements during the search were either spontaneous or made after he was informed of his rights, thereby complying with legal requirements. Consequently, the State requests that the court deny Kohberger's motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search at 119 Lamsden Drive and his subsequent statements.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:111424-REDACTED-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Lamsden-Statements.pdf

From the archives: 12-25-22Bryan Kohberger and his time at Washington State University has always been of interest and in this episode we are learning more about his time at WSU and more context about the interview he had with Pullman PD.(commercial at 7:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders update: Taxi driver who took victims home before stabbings says final ride ‘weighs on him' | The Independent

In the final rebuttal of the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey delivered a sharp, surgical dismantling of the defense's narrative. She told the jury that Sean Combs' legal team had spent more time attacking the victims than actually refuting the charges. Comey emphasized that the defense wanted the jury to fixate on distractions—on credibility issues, sex, fame, and salacious details—rather than the through-line of abuse and control that ran across every victim's testimony. She asserted that the witnesses' imperfections didn't negate the consistency of their stories, but rather underscored how real and raw their trauma was. According to Comey, the defense's case relied not on innocence, but on shame—shaming the victims, questioning their motives, and hoping the jury would do the same.Comey then turned her focus to the broader implications of the case, urging jurors not to be seduced by the glitz and chaos that surrounded Combs' world. She reminded them that at its core, this wasn't about celebrity—it was about a man who used money, violence, and manipulation to maintain control over his inner circle. She walked them back through key testimony, highlighting how the accounts independently aligned on themes of fear, coercion, and isolation. In her final moments, Comey made a direct appeal to the jury's sense of duty—not to be dazzled, not to be intimidated, but to see the case for what it was: a clear, prosecutable pattern of criminal conduct under the law. Her tone was resolute, leaving the jury with a piercing reminder: the law doesn't bend for fame.And now...Diddy is on the clock as verdict watch is set to begin starating next week.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress

This week, in Shakopee, Minnesota, a crazy scene unfolds, when witnesses see a man removing a headless body from his car... in the middle of an intersection. He makes an insane excuse that somehow, he beheaded his wife, by accident, but it's obvious that more is going on. The killer has had mental problems for a while, including believing that his eyes have been removed, and cameras have been implanted in his body!!   Along the way, we find out that you should always be wary of roller coasters, that when someone tries to burn themselves alive, they probably need some serious help, and that it's impossible to "accidentally" decapitate someone!!   New episodes, every Wednesday & Friday nights!!   Donate at Patreon.com/crimeinsports or go to paypal.com and use our email: crimeinsports@gmail.com Go to shutupandgivememurder.com for all things Small Town Murder, Crime In Sports & Your Stupid Opinions!   Follow us on... instagram.com/smalltownmurder facebook.com/smalltownpod   Also, check out James & Jimmie's other shows, Crime In Sports & Your Stupid Opinions on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts!!

In the summer of 1968, two young children, both under the age of five, turned up dead in Scotswood, a run down neighborhood of primarily government housing in the industrial English city of Newcastle upon Tyne. Initially, the first boy's death had been ruled an accident. But when the second died... they knew he had been strangled. And the coroner felt another child had been the one to do it. Sadly, he was right. Who would've thought a young girl, just ten years old when she killed her first victim, was capable of this? For Merch and everything else Bad Magic related, head to: https://www.badmagicproductions.com

Woodward and Bernstein uncover a shocking revelation about President Nixon's chief of staff. But when their story is published, the reporters find themselves backed into a corner.Be the first to know about Wondery's newest podcasts, curated recommendations, and more! Sign up now at https://wondery.fm/wonderynewsletterListen to American Scandal on the Wondery App or wherever you get your podcasts. Experience all episodes ad-free and be the first to binge the newest season. Unlock exclusive early access by joining Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Start your free trial today by visiting wondery.com/links/american-scandal/ now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Kate discusses Real Housewives of Miami this week on Bravo, and My Mom Jayne on HBO. My Mom Jayne is an HBO documentary film directed by Mariska Hargitay, focusing on her mother, actress Jayne Mansfield. It explores Jayne Mansfield's life and legacy through the lens of her daughter, Mariska Hargitay, who was only three years old when her mother died. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Weirdos! It's summertime, and it's time for you to pack a backpack, grab your sleeping bag, and join us for some creepy campfire tales! To make them even BETER- they're brought TO you, BY you, FOR you, FROM you, and ALLLLL about you! LISTEN to this Nicholas-less version on all podcast platforms OR WATCH the Nicholas version on Youtube on FRIDAY 6/27/2025!If you've got a listener tale please send it on over to Morbidpodcast@gmail.com with “Listener Tales” somewhere in the subject line- and if you share pictures- please let us know if we can share them with fellow weirdos! :)Stay in the know - wondery.fm/morbid-wondery.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week, in Wakefield, Massachusetts, when two people are shockingly murdered, it leads detectives down a rabbit hole of mystery, with enemies, business associates, and even possible mafia connections. They end up settling on a much more personal, and nasty motive, all stemming from having fun times, at a lake house. It's a twisted story, filled with conspiracy, lies, partial truths, affairs, and maybe even some reasonable doubt!   Along the way, we find out that no one loves mechanical bulls more than Italian people, that even spending time at a lake house can come with some stress, and that you can't lie to everyone, all the time, and get away with it!!   New episodes every Wednesday & Friday nights!   Donate at patreon.com/crimeinsports or go to paypal.com and use our email: crimeinsports@gmail.com Go to shutupandgivememurder.com for all things Small Town Murder, Crime In Sports & Your Stupid Opinions!   Follow us on... instagram.com/smalltownmurder facebook.com/smalltownpod   Alos, check out James & Jimmie's others, Crime In Sports & Your Stupid Opinions on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or whever you listen to podcasts!!