Podcasts about Iyer

What if the biggest limitation in your life isn't your circumstances, but what you've been taught to believe is possible? On this episode of Better Call Daddy, Reena Friedman Watts sits down with Dr. Ravi Iyer, a physician with more than four decades of experience, for a thought-provoking conversation about human potential, authenticity, integrity, suffering, emotional wealth, family, artificial intelligence, and the future of humanity. Dr. Iyer's lifelong curiosity began as a child when he started questioning how life works—and what happens when it doesn't. That curiosity eventually led him into medicine and decades of exploring the human experience. He opens up about his complicated relationship with his father and the tension between love and fear, sharing how those early experiences shaped his understanding of integrity, possibility, relationships, and what it means to live authentically. The conversation goes far beyond medicine. Reena and Dr. Iyer explore how language shapes our reality, why our words matter, what suffering can teach us, and why emotional wealth may be more valuable than financial wealth. Dr. Iyer shares his powerful perspective on integrity: being your word, no matter what, and helping other people become more of who they are capable of being. Then they tackle one of the biggest questions of our time: What happens to truth, reality, and human connection in the age of artificial intelligence? As AI becomes increasingly influential, Dr. Iyer argues that society will need people who can help distinguish reality from misinformation—what he calls “authenticators of reality.” Ultimately, this episode asks a bigger question: How much more is possible for each of us if we stop accepting the limits we've been given? If you've ever questioned your purpose, struggled through suffering, felt limited by expectations, or wondered how AI will change what it means to be human, this conversation will make you think.

In this episode of The Winston Marshall Show, I sit down with Abhijit Iyer-Mitra for a conversation on British rule in India, colonialism, partition, Islam, and the rewriting of Indian history. We discuss whether the British Empire was ultimately good or bad for India, Churchill and the Bengal famine, the Mughal Empire, India and Pakistan, Kashmir, free speech, and what Britain can learn from India about national identity and integration.WATCH THE EXTENDED CONVERSATION HERE: https://www.winstonmarshall.co.uk/LIVE EVENT: Is Islam compatible with the West? Get your discounted first release tickets now before they sell out: https://winstonmarshall.eventbrite.co.uk I can't wait for you to join us in London for one of the most important debates of our timeChapters00:00 Was British Rule Good or Bad for India?02:24 Did Britain Deindustrialise India?11:49 What Britain Gave India16:15 The Benefits of British Rule28:13 British Rule, Famines & Churchill40:44 Partition: Was It Good for India?43:45 Kashmir & the India-Pakistan Conflict45:45 How India Became an Economic Success50:55 Islam, Integration & British Identity57:22 What Went Wrong With Multicultural Britain?01:03:29 Free Speech & Hate Crime Laws01:08:02 Final Thoughts

Abhijit Iyer Mitra on Saurav Das, Amit Shah, Internal Security, IT Cell | Abhijit Iyer Podcast

The BIG CJP EXPOSE | Cockroach No 1, 2 & 3 | MUST WATCH | Abhijit Iyer Mitra Podcast

Embedded earrings are a common pediatric emergency department presentation that can usually be managed quickly and safely without procedural sedation. This episode reviews why earrings become embedded, how to distinguish uncomplicated earlobe cases from higher-risk cartilage piercings, step-by-step removal techniques, pain control strategies, and appropriate wound care, antibiotics, and follow-up. Learning Objectives Recognize the evaluation and management of embedded earlobe earrings, including indications for local anesthesia, incision, and removal techniques. Differentiate uncomplicated earlobe piercings from cartilage piercings that require additional concern for perichondritis, Pseudomonas infection, and possible ENT consultation. Apply evidence-based post-procedure care, including appropriate wound management, antibiotic selection, and counseling to help prevent future embedded earrings. References Timm N, Iyer S. Embedded earrings in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(1):21-24. Muntz HR, Pa-C DJ, Asher BF. Embedded earrings: a complication of the ear-piercing gun. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;19(1):73-76. Kim MM, Goldman RD. Ear-piercing complications in children and adolescents. Can Fam Physician. 2022;68(9):661-663. Transcript This transcript was generated using Descript and subsequently reviewed and lightly edited for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Minor inaccuracies may remain, and the audio recording should be considered the definitive version of this content. Welcome to PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast. As always, I'm your host, Brad Sobolewski. Today, we're continuing our new series on minor procedures. These are the procedures we perform all the time in pediatric emergency departments. They're not the subject of giant multicenter trials or big keynote lectures, but they are the procedures that families remember. If you make them quick, comfortable, and maybe even a little less scary, families and patients will remember that. And if the procedure turns into a wrestling match with three people trying to hold down a screaming child while you're searching for an earring backing, they're gonna remember that too. Today's topic is embedded earrings. A kid walks into the emergency department holding one ear. The earlobe is swollen and red, and the parent says, “I can't find their earring.” It didn't disappear. The ear basically swallowed it, and the parents almost always feel bad. They think they did something wrong or they waited too long. Honestly, this happens all the time. The first one can be a little intimidating because the hardware isn't always where you expect it to be, but after you've removed a few of these, you'll realize they're actually pretty straightforward. Most can be managed right in the emergency department or a well-resourced urgent care. One of the best studies on the topic actually came from Cincinnati Children's. Tim and Iyer reviewed over 100 children who presented to our emergency department with embedded earrings over about a four-and-a-half-year period. The median age was eight years, and about 60% of the children were younger than 10. That fits with most of our clinical experience. Younger children are more likely to sleep on new piercings, play with their earrings, forget the aftercare instructions, or simply not notice that the backing has become too tight. Nearly 90% of embedded earrings involve the earlobe rather than the cartilage, and in about two-thirds of patients, it wasn't the decorative front of the earring that got stuck, it was the posterior backing or clasp. That's helpful because I, um, almost always start looking on the back of the ear, ‘cause usually they've taken off the front. About one-third of children had evidence of a localized infection when they presented. Usually, that meant tenderness, erythema, swelling, and maybe a little purulent drainage or crusting around the piercing. Doesn't necessarily mean they need oral or systemic antibiotics, but it does mean they shouldn't wait another week hoping the earring somehow works itself out. So why does this happen? It's really a pressure injury. The backing gets tightened against the earlobe, either because it was applied too snugly when the ears were pierced or because the ear swells afterward and suddenly there's no room for the tissue to expand. That constant pressure decreases blood flow, produces local inflammation, and eventually the skin begins to grow around the earring hardware. Kids speed the whole process along by twisting the earrings, playing with them, sleeping on them, bumping them during play, and not cleaning the piercing consistently while it's healing. One thing that probably contributes as well is the spring-loaded ear piercing gun. These devices place the earring and immediately snap on the backing, and sometimes that backing ends up much tighter than it should be. If swelling develops over the next day or so, the backing can quickly become buried beneath the skin. It's one of the reasons I generally recommend families avoid piercing guns and instead use a method that leaves just a little room for post-procedure swelling. When these patients show up in the emergency department, they almost always complain of pain, swelling, redness, and tenderness around the piercing site. Sometimes there's drainage. Sometimes the parent says they can't unscrew the backing anymore. Sometimes they tell you they can feel the earring in the earlobe, but you can't actually see it. Now, I'll get to the procedure technique in just a minute. But before I start talking about that, I do wanna separate earlobe piercings from cartilage piercing, ‘cause they're really different problems. Once cartilage is involved, the stakes go up considerably. Cartilage has relatively poor blood supply, making it much more susceptible to perichondritis, chondritis, cartilage necrosis, and permanent cosmetic deformity. The bacteria may be different as well. We'll come back to that later. For now, though, let's stay with the earlobe because, frankly, that's where almost all of these procedures occur. All right. Before you start any procedure, you wanna have everything ready. So I'll have local anesthetic, so lidocaine or lidocaine with epi. Epi is totally fine in the earlobe. At least two mosquito hemostats, stuff to grab the earring, an 11 blade, gauze, saline, and a good light source. I think if there's any chance I'll need to make a small incision, I'll prep the ear before I do anything with, uh, betadine or chlorhexidine. Once the ear starts bleeding a little or the child starts moving around, everything gets just a little harder to see and grab. Absolutely bring your child life specialist if you've got them and someone to hold, like a medic or a PCA. One of the interesting things about the Cincinnati study is that none of the 100 children required procedural sedation. None. And honestly, that fits with my experience. The overwhelming majority of these can be managed with local anesthesia alone. For the earlobe, I usually perform a small field block using one percent lidocaine with epinephrine, using a twenty-seven or thirty-gauge needle. Epi is perfectly safe in the earlobe and gives you a little hemostasis while you're working. One thing I probably do differently from some people is I actually wait for the anesthetic to work a little longer. I don't just block and immediately start. I'll wait at least five minutes. Honestly, it's usually closer to seven to ten minutes. During that time, I'm talking with the family, keeping child life involved, making sure all my equipment is ready, and just letting everybody settle down a bit. Those extra few minutes make the whole procedure a lot easier. And again, this is pediatrics, so never underestimate distraction. You've got videos, music, you know, stuffed animal, a toy. Parents should be there holding the child's hand. You gotta coach the parents as well. And sometimes that's really all you need, a good block and some distraction. Of course, some kids do need more. For an anxious child, you can use intranasal midazolam or oral midazolam. If your department has nitrous oxide, this is a great procedure for it because it's usually pretty quick. You're often treating anxiety more than pain. I have used ketamine a handful of times, and not because something went wrong, but just because you have an extremely anxious child, and you're not gonna accomplish the procedure safely any other way. First, figure out what you can see and what you can feel. Sometimes both the decorative front and backing are still visible, but the ear is simply too swollen to separate them normally. Those are the easy ones. I'd grab each side with a mosquito hemostat, disengage the backing from the post, and remove the earring. More commonly, the backing is buried beneath the skin. The decorative front may still be attached, or the parents may have already removed it and left the backing sitting in the earlobe. I'll gently compress the earlobe from the front while looking at the back. That pressure tents the skin enough to expose a few millimeters of metal through the original piercing hole, and that may be all that I need to grab the backing and remove it. If you still can't see it, keep palpating. Usually, I can feel the hardware through the swollen tissue. Once you localize it, I'll make a tiny incision on the back of the earlobe directly over it. And when I say tiny, I mean tiny, like a couple millimeters, just enough to expose the metal. But don't be afraid of making that incision. It's honestly usually the difference between wrestling with the earring for ten minutes and having it out within sixty seconds. From there, the rest is pretty straightforward. Whether the front is buried, the backing is buried, or neither side is visible, I gently spread the tissue with a mosquito hemostat until the hardware comes into view. Notice that I said spread, not dissect. You're not hunting for the earring. You're simply opening the tissue until you see the hardware, enabling yourself to grab it. Once you can see metal, you're almost done. Hold one side steady and separate the backing from the post. Don't just grab one piece and pull because the whole earring will usually rotate within the earlobe instead of coming apart. I also keep gauze or a surgical towel underneath the ear while I'm working. The little backings seem to launch themselves across the room every single time you let go, and I'd rather catch one than spend five minutes looking under the stretcher. Occasionally, you'll inherit a child who's already had one or two unsuccessful attempts. Maybe the parents tried at home, maybe the pediatrician tried, maybe another emergency department tried. Every failed attempt makes the next one more difficult. If you're not making progress, ask yourself, “Am I pulling in the right direction? Do I actually know where the backing is, or am I just fishing for it? Would a tiny posterior incision solve this? Do I need another pair of hands or somebody more experienced?” Most of the time, changing your approach works better than just yanking harder. Once the earring's out, I always look at both pieces. Is the backing intact? Is the decorative front intact? Is the post complete? If something doesn't look right, especially when you compare it, hopefully, to the other earring that they brought or at least a picture of it, I'll go back and explore the wound. The last thing you want to do is leave a small piece of metal behind. Once I know everything is out, I put the earring and the backing into a specimen cup and hand it back to the family. They almost always appreciate getting the jewelry back, especially if it has sentimental value. Then I'll irrigate the wound with about one hundred to two hundred milliliters of saline. I'm not trying to pressure irrigate it like a contaminated laceration. I just want to wash away dry drainage, debris, and any small blood clots around the piercing tract. After that, I make sure the bleeding is stopped and that the earlobe still has good color and perfusion before the child leaves. One other question that comes up pretty often, should you close the incision? Most of the time, I don't. These are really small incisions, usually only a millimeter or two, and it's okay to allow them to heal by secondary intention. If there's any contamination or early infection, I don't want to trap that underneath a closed wound. Every once in a while, though, I'll have to make a larger incision, maybe because the backing was deeply embedded or it's larger or the tissue was particularly swollen. If that incision is more than two or three millimeters, I'll have a conversation with the family about the trade-off between cosmesis and infection risk. In some of those cases, I'll loosely approximate the incision with one or two absorbable sutures, something like 5-0 fast-absorbing gut. If I do that, I'll only close the incision I created. I still leave the original piercing tract open because I want any residual pus to have somewhere to go. That's also one of the advantages of making the incision on the back of the earlobe. If you decide to leave it open or even if you only loosely close part of it, any resulting scar is usually much less noticeable than it would be on the front. Whether I suture or not, I make sure we've got good hemostasis and that the earlobe still has good color and perfusion, and then I'll put some antibiotic ointment and a bandage on it and call it a day. Honestly, if there's no cellulitis, no abscess, and the child is otherwise healthy, I generally don't prescribe oral antibiotics. Topical antibiotic ointment and routine wound care are usually enough. Redness by itself does not equal infection. These ears are inflamed and swollen simply because the earring has been buried in the tissue. If there's expanding cellulitis, significant purulent drainage, an associated abscess, fever, or if the child is immunocompromised or has something like diabetes, then I'll start some oral antibiotics. My first choice is usually cephalexin because these are uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by methicillin-sensitive staph or streptococci that cause common skin infections. If the kid has a history of MRSA, there's a high local prevalence of community-associated MRSA, the family's had MRSA, or the infection is frankly purulent, then I'll switch to clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, depending on local resistance patterns. Let's come back to cartilage one more time. There, you're primarily worried about perichondritis, where Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the major pathogen. These patients usually warrant ENT involvement, and antibiotic selection changes substantially, often requiring antipseudomonal coverage. That's a separate entity from the routine embedded earlobe earring. Families will also ask, “Can we just put it back in?” Eh, not so fast, right? That piercing tract isn't really a piercing anymore. It's a wound. Let it heal completely. If they decide to pierce it again, I'd recommend choosing a slightly different location once everything is healed. You should also talk to families about how to keep this from happening again. Most of the time, this isn't because the family did something wrong. Sometimes it just happened. But there are a few things that probably would help. Avoid spring-loaded piercing guns if possible. Don't clamp the backing tightly against the earlobe. Leave just a little room for swelling. Keep new piercings clean while they're healing. And if they notice the backing start disappearing beneath the skin, don't wait several days hoping the swelling will go down and it'll just work itself out. These are much easier to remove when they're only partially embedded than when the skin has completely grown over the hardware. All right, a few take-home points. First, figure out which part of the earring is actually embedded before you start yanking on anything. Give your local anesthetic, lido with epi, time to work. I usually wait at least five minutes, but more often seven to ten. And most uncomplicated earlobe piercings don't need oral antibiotics after removal. And again, this was really an episode about earlobe embedded earrings. If you're dealing with cartilaginous piercings that get stuck or infected, think Pseudomonas, think perichondritis, and early ENT involvement. Honestly, I really enjoy this procedure. It's quick, it's satisfying, and families are incredibly appreciative when you're done. The ear looked terrible when they walked in, they thought their child might need surgery, and then 15 minutes later, they're walking out with a Band-Aid, their earring in a specimen cup, and the popsicle color of their choice. These are the fun procedures. So I hope you enjoyed this installment in our minor procedures series. I've already got several more procedures on my list, and I'll be working through them over time. If there's one that you'd like me to cover, let me know. As the kids would say, like, rate, and review. If you leave a review on your favorite podcast platform, it really does help other clinicians discover the show, which I appreciate because it helps teach more people good stuff. For PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast, this has been Brad Sobolewski. See you next time.

Shridhar Iyer spent more than 13 years inside Meta's data organization, most recently leading AI and the data stack. He joins Tristan Handy to talk about how deleting a single column can save millions at Meta scale, the abstraction stack that quietly powers the company, and the two steps every company needs to become AI-native. Plus a detour through the hard problem of consciousness. For full show notes and to read the podcast's companion newsletter, head to https://roundup.getdbt.com. The Analytics Engineering Podcast is sponsored by dbt Labs.

Modi Stepped Back… But Was It Actually a Masterstroke? | Abhijit Iyer Mitra vs Tehseen Poonawala

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/middle-eastern-studies

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/african-studies

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/food

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/south-asian-studies

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The United States' superpower status is often associated with its industrial, financial, and military might. Yet its global power after the Second World War hinged in part on something often seen as backward: agriculture. In contrast to Britain, the predominant global power of the nineteenth century, which depended on its current and former colonies for food and raw materials, the United States produced vast agricultural surpluses. During the 1950s, an era of decolonization and rising Cold War competition, the United States became the dominant exporter of food staples to industrializing nations in the Third World through its massive food aid program. Through the lens of food and agriculture, Agrarian Superpower: Food, Development, and the Global Ascendancy of the United States (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Samantha Iyer offers new ways to understand the roots of the post–Second World War global order and the US position in it. Samantha Iyer traces how two former British territories and agricultural competitors of the United States, India and Egypt, became two of the largest importers of US food aid. She investigates the origins and consequences of the US-centric postwar food regime by examining changes in the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural surpluses from the late nineteenth century to the early 1970s. Bringing together life in villages, towns, and cities with national, imperial, and international affairs, Dr. Iyer demonstrates that food aid was the expression of a changed political, economic, and ecological world that the United States did not create alone. Drawing on sources in Arabic, French, Urdu, and English, Agrarian Superpower is a groundbreaking comparative history of food, agriculture, and development. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.

Every customer service call now produces a measurable outcome, which is exactly why customer experience has become the place where agentic AI either proves itself or falls apart. Most enterprise AI hype centres on generation and productivity. But according to Sneha Iyer, who leads AI value delivery and analytics at Observe.ai, the real test of agentic AI is happening somewhere less flashy, which is the contact centre. In a recent episode of Tech Transformed, host Ravit Jain asked Iyer why customer experience (CX) has become the industry's default stress test and what that means for enterprises still sorting isolated chatbots from genuine AI agents. Iyer has spent nearly a decade watching CX change from manual quality assurance to a blended workforce of human and AI agents. This shift, she says, has quietly rewritten the metrics, tooling, and governance decisions every enterprise leader now has to make.Why Customer Experience Became AI's Testing GroundIyer explains that CX generates more human-AI interaction data than almost any other business function. Every conversation resolves in a clear outcome, resolved or not, retained or churned, and it spans every modality a company touches, from voice to chat to email. Solve AI reliability here, and the lessons transfer everywhere else.What's actually changed, she notes, isn't that AI got smarter; it's that AI stopped just watching and started acting. Where AI agents once flagged patterns in a transcript after the fact, they now issue refunds, verify identities, and book appointments in real time. This has split the workforce in two, namely, AI agents absorb the high-volume, low-risk interactions, while human agents get pushed toward the complex, judgment-heavy calls machines shouldn't handle alone. Old metrics like containment and deflection no longer capture that split; leaders now need blended resolution measures that account for both.Fragmented AI StacksIf you ask most contact centres what their AI stack looks like, you'll find what Iyer calls a "Frankenstein stack": one tool for analytics, another for telephony, another for conversational intelligence, stitched together and barely talking to each other. That setup was tolerable when each tool did one isolated job. It breaks the moment you add agentic AI, because these types of systems depend on shared context to function.Without that context, a customer verified by an AI agent has to repeat everything to the human agent who picks up next, which turns an already frustrating support call into a worse one. Fragmented tools also make it nearly impossible to prove ROI, since every vendor tracks success differently and costs stack with each new integration.This is the case for unified CX platforms: not as a nice-to-have, but as the only way to preserve context across a customer's full journey. Iyer points to "companion agents" as a concrete example of real-time, in-context support for human agents that shows them exactly why an AI agent escalated a call and what happened before they picked up.Build vs. BuyOn the build-versus-buy question, Iyer highlights that building in-house looks cheap upfront and rarely stays that way. Models change every few weeks, which turns any custom build into a permanent maintenance commitment most teams underestimate, including in regulated industries like healthcare and finance, where leaders often assume building keeps data safer. In practice, established vendors have already solved the compliance groundwork, data residency, model governance, and audit trails that a custom build would take months to replicate.Trust, she argues, isn't really about doubting AI's competence. It's the fear of the one catastrophic interaction happening at scale. That's what simulation testing and evaluation frameworks are for, stress-testing AI agents against the hardest, most ambiguous scenarios before launch, not just the easy paths, backed by governance frameworks that can roll back a deployment fast if something breaks.Looking six to twelve months out, Iyer expects three shifts, continued consolidation around unified platforms, evaluation frameworks becoming the real competitive edge (not raw model performance), and pricing models moving from seat-based to outcome-based. Her advice to leaders is to build auditability and governance into your AI strategy now, before regulation forces the issue.Building Customer ExperienceThe throughline of Iyer's conversation with Jain is that agentic AI in customer experience succeeds or fails on infrastructure and trust, not on which model you're running. Enterprises that unify their data, rethink their success metrics, and choose vendors who can prove reliability through thorough testing are the ones positioned to scale AI-driven CX without breaking it. If you would like to find out more about this visit observe.ai or connect with Sneha Iyer on LinkedIn.TakeawaysShift from isolated AI tools to integrated agent systems.Importance of simulation testing and evaluation frameworks.Benefits of unified customer experience platforms.Build versus buy decision in enterprise AI.Future trends in AI-powered customer experience.Chapters00:00 Introduction to Tech Transform and AI Evolution02:01 Sneha Iyer's Role and Background in AI09:35 The Shift in Customer Experience with Agentic AI13:24 The Move Towards Unified Customer Experience Platforms18:55 Build vs. Buy: Navigating AI Solutions in Enterprises20:59 The Cost of AI Maintenance and Vendor Insights22:20 Navigating Compliance in Regulated Industries24:52 Building Trust in AI Adoption30:00 Use Cases Driving AI Value34:31 Future Trends in AI Customer Experience

This Detroit Red Wings podcast convenes a full roundtable with Max Bultman & Prashanth Iyer to break down Steve Yzerman stepping aside & the search for Detroit's next GM. Hockeytown news and analysis digs into trade buzz surrounding Dylan Larkin & what this front office shakeup means for the direction of the franchise. (00:00) - Intro (04:15) - Reacting to the GM News Why the timing caught everyone off guard, the unfinished offseason business that may have forced the issue, and a look back at the tenure - the early cap cleanup versus the last five years of one and a half steps forward, one and a quarter back. (10:25) - What the Next Front Office Should Look Like Analytics minds, former agents, the Tigers' data investment, the Carolina model, and why groupthink has to go. Plus the internal vs. external candidate debate and the power dynamic between a president of hockey ops and GM. (38:25) - The Dylan Larkin Trade Request Can a new regime repair the relationship, or does a Dylan Larkin trade have to happen? Trade return expectations, futures vs. young players, and three-team trade scenarios. (57:00) - Contract Talk Simon Edvinsson's unsigned contract and the offer sheet risk (real?), plus why an Alex DeBrincat extension might be a blank check situation. (1:10:25) - Overtime Mailbag Which prospects are untouchable, ceilings for the top names, and the Lucas Raymond at center experiment. --- This episode is brought to you by Hims. Visit hims.com/wingedwheel for your personalized hair loss treatment options. Support the show: Patreon.com/WingedWheelPodcast Head over to wingedwheelpodcast.com to find all the ways to listen, how to support the show, and so much more!

Brandon interviews Arjun Iyer, CEO & Co-founder of Signadot. They discuss how Ephemeral Environments eliminate developer toil by shifting validation earlier in the dev cycle, how Signadot's MCP server lets AI coding agents run end-to-end tests autonomously, and real-world results including Brex saving $2M in cloud spend. Plus, how Cisco bought AppDynamics for ~$4 billion the day before their IPO. Watch the YouTube Live Recording of Episode 581 Show Links Signadot Free Trial Brex Case Study Signadot Documentation Overview Contact Arjun Iyer LinkedIn: Arjun Iyer Twitter: @arjuniyer_ SDT News & Hype Join us in Slack. Get a SDT Sticker! Send your postal address to stickers@softwaredefinedtalk.com and we will send you free laptop stickers! Follow us: Twitch, Twitter, Instagram, Mastodon, BlueSky, LinkedIn, TikTok, Threads and YouTube. Use the code SDT to get $20 off Coté's book, Digital WTF, so $5 total. Become a sponsor of Software Defined Talk! Special Guest: Arjun Iyer.

T20 World Cup के बाद भारत को अब भी पहली जीत की तलाश है. आयरलैंड में मिट्टी पलीद होने के बाद इंग्लैंड सीरीज में भी टीम इंडिया को निराशा ही हाथ लगी है. इस बीच वैभव सूर्यवंशी का इंटरनेशनल डेब्यू हो गया. लेकिन संजू सैमसन को बाहर का रास्ता दिखा दिया गया. इतना ही नहीं टी20 वर्ल्ड कप में लगातार तीन मैच जिताकर प्लेयर ऑफ़ द टूर्नामेंट बने संजू ज़िम्बॉब्वे टूर से भी ड्रॉप हो गए हैं. आख़िर संजू सैमसन हर बार सॉफ़्ट टारगेट क्यों हो जाते हैं, टीम मैनेजमेंट उनके साथ घोर अन्याय क्यों कर रहा और उनका प्लेइंग 11 में होना क्यों फ़ायदेमंद है? क्या वैभव सूर्यवंशी को पर्याप्त मौके मिलेंगे या भविष्य में उनका हश्र भी संजू की तरह होगा? RCB को लगातार दो बार चैंपियन बनाने वाले कप्तान रजत पाटीदार की जगह ज़िम्बॉब्वे सीरीज में भी क्यों नहीं बनी? RCB की टीम से रसिख सलाम डार और क्रुणाल पंड्या जैसे प्लेयर क्यों नहीं चुने जा रहे? इसके अलावा नए नवेले कप्तान श्रेयस अय्यर की कप्तानी पर सवाल क्यों उठ रहे हैं, क्या उनका भी टिकट जल्द कट सकता है? रवि विश्नोई के ख़राब परफॉरमेंस के बाद सवाल ये भी है कि युजवेंद्र चहल को सेलेक्टर क्यों भूले बैठे हैं? IPL 2026 में विकेटलेस रहे मयंक यादव को किस बिनाह पर टीम में जगह मिली? साथ ही ऑस्ट्रेलिया के विमेंस T20 वर्ल्ड कप जीतने और बाबर आज़म के पाकिस्तानी टेस्ट टीम के कप्तान बनने पर दिलचस्प चर्चा, सुनिए 'बल्लाबोल' के इस एपिसोड में कुमार केशव और निखिल नाज़ के साथ.होस्ट & प्रड्यूस: कुमार केशवसाउंड मिक्सिंग: रोहन भारती

This Detroit Red Wings podcast reacts to the Brady Tkachuk trade to the Florida Panthers & what it means for Red Wings trade rumors surrounding Dylan Larkin. Hockeytown news & analysis breaks down Yzerman's leverage, the looming Larkin return, and decisions on Patrick Kane and Alex DeBrincat. (00:00) - Brady Tkachuk Trade Reaction The guys get into the blockbuster the second it broke, the Team USA "group chat" of it all, and why Ottawa fans might actually be the lucky ones here. (03:45) - Breaking Down the Trade Details & Team USA Super Team Drama The full package Florida sent to land Tkachuk, plus the earlier Mackie Samoskevich move to Seattle that set it all up. Also, players openly recruiting each other, the push to pull stars back across the border, and whether the league can do anything about it. (11:45) - How This Affects the Red Wings Why this trade sets the floor for a Dylan Larkin return and takes one team off his list. (21:20) - Kane and DeBrincat Decisions Whether Patrick Kane re-signs and how Detroit should handle a possible Alex DeBrincat extension. (26:40) - Prashanth Iyer Interview The "If I Were Steve Yzerman" piece (read here: https://prashanthiyer.substack.com/p/if-i-were-steve-yzerman-2026-edition), the Carolina blueprint, and chasing a future 1C through the Larkin trade. (52:45) - Prospect Profile: Wyatt Cullen The skilled USNTDP winger, his deception, and why he's climbing draft boards. (56:35) - Prospect Profile: Maddox Dagenais A big QMJHL power winger with a heavy shot - boom-or-bust second-round swing? (1:03:50) - Overtime: Patron Questions & Draft Coverage Coming Up Should the team make a Larkin statement, Yzerman's silence, and prospect misses of the past. Plu, upcoming NHL Draft Preview episode, the Friday live stream, and Patron-exclusive day two hangout. ~~~~~ Go to TempoMeals.com/WINGEDWHEEL  for 60% off your first box! #ad This episode is brought to you by Hims. Visit hims.com/wingedwheel for your personalized hair loss treatment options. Support the show: Patreon.com/WingedWheelPodcast Head over to wingedwheelpodcast.com to find all the ways to listen, how to support the show, and so much more!

- Get NordVPN with a special discount - https://www.nordvpn.com/goodareas - Get an exclusive 15% discount on Saily data plans! Use code 'goodareas' at checkout. Download Saily app or go to: https://saily.com/goodareas - In this episode of The Kimappa Show, Jarrod and Robin discuss Shreyas Iyer's return to India's T20I squad as captain and the implications of Suryakumar Yadav's exit from the leadership role. They examine the selection decisions, leadership transition, squad balance, and what this change means for the future of India's T20 cricket setup. - - To support the podcast please go to our Patreon page -  https://www.patreon.com/c/goodareaspodcast  - Head over to commbox.tv to learn more about our network. - This podcast is edited and mixed by Ishit Kuberkar,    he's at https://instagram.com/ishitk86   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Pain affects millions of people, yet many continue to ignore it, assuming it is a normal part of life. In this episode, Dr. Sadasivan S Iyer, shares his journey from anaesthesia to specializing in pain management and explains why chronic pain deserves greater attention and care.The conversation explores the differences between acute and chronic pain, the role of interventional pain management in improving patient outcomes, and how palliative care helps enhance the quality of life for individuals facing serious illnesses, including cancer. Dr. Iyer also discusses insights gained from international training and compares global and Indian approaches to pain management.Listeners will walk away with practical strategies for preventing and managing common issues such as back pain, stress-related discomfort, and lifestyle-induced pain, making this episode valuable for anyone seeking a healthier and more comfortable life.Tune in for an informative discussion on understanding pain, seeking timely treatment, and embracing a better quality of life.Guest: Dr. Sadasivan S Iyer, Consultant - Anaesthesia And Pain Management, Manipal Hospital Old Airport Road, BengaluruHost: MadhaviSound: Mahesh R.Producer: Archita Puranik

The Annamalai Mystery - Plans of Amit Shah | Bengal | Pakistan - Trump | Abhijit Iyer Mitra

Send comments and feedbackIn this Sharp Waves podcast episode “Epilepsy and Functional/Dissociative Seizures,” Wesley Kerr, MD, PhD, a statistician and epileptologist at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, joins Shruti Iyer, MD, a third year neurology resident at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, to discuss their recently published study on categorizing the probability of epilepsy in patients already diagnosed with functional dissociative seizures (FDS). The conversation highlights how this proposed framework may help clinicians better identify patients who could have coexisting epilepsy and improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. The episode also notes that functional dissociative seizures were previously, and in some settings are still, referred to as psychogenic non epileptic seizures (PNES).You can access the research article here. Sharp Waves episodes are meant for informational purposes only, and not as clinical or medical advice.Let us know how we're doing:  info@ilae.orgThe International League Against Epilepsy is the world's preeminent association of health professionals and scientists, working toward a world where no person's life is limited by epilepsy. Visit us on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.

This Detroit Red Wings (and currently Grand Rapids Griffins) podcast breaks down Michael Brandsegg-Nygard's heroics, Red Wings offseason direction with Prashanth Iyer as the Wings figure out how to actually build a contender. News and analysis covers Simon Edvinsson's contract, Sebastian Cossa's future, and MBN saving the Griffins' season with an all-time overtime goal. (00:00) - Intro Sentience watch in Detroit and why one Griffins prospect might be ready to wake the lineup up. (03:55) - Prashanth Iyer on the Red Wings Season A 10,000-foot look at what happened - overperformance through December, the March collapse, and the 5-on-5 scoring problem that buried the team. (07:00) - Picking an Offseason Lane The case for committing one direction: aggressive trades to build around Dylan Larkin, Lucas Raymond, and Alex DeBrincat, or hitting the reset button before Larkin turns 31. (15:55) - Potential Trade Targets Josh Norris, William Nylander, Mikey Anderson, Robert Thomas, and Elias Pettersson - who actually moves the needle and who carries the most risk. (20:20) - Free Agent Options Alex Tuch's pointless 2nd round and the contract conversation, plus thoughts on Bobby McMann as a speed-adding fit. (23:50) - Simon Edvinsson Contract Bridge vs. eight-year max term, why the cap going up bakes in the hedge, and the Jaccob Slavin comparison for locking up a unicorn early. (31:20) - Sebastian Cossa's Future Waiver-exempt status is gone - what that does to his trade value and whether he's actually ready to be an NHL backup next year. (36:10) - Griffins Stay Alive Michael Brandsegg-Nygard's filthy overtime winner keeps the Calder Cup hopes breathing, plus huge goals from Carter Mazur, John Leonard, and more as Postava hangs on. (43:55) - Habs-Sabres Game 7 and Conference Finals Predictions Alex Newhook's overtime winner, UPL's nerves, and why the Atlantic Division just got even harder for Detroit. Plus, Carolina vs. Montreal and Colorado vs. Vegas - rust, rest, and which underdog has the better shot. (56:20) - Prospect Profiles: Ivar Stenberg and Thomas Vandenberg The case for Stenberg over Gavin McKenna at first overall and why his SHL production is the real deal. Vandenberg: The Athletic mocked him to Detroit at 47 - a perfect Steve Yzerman type, which may be exactly the problem. (1:10:30) - Overtime Mailbag Patreon questions and comments: What if Jakub Vrana panned out, waiving roster vets, and which Red Wing gets a video-game stat boost. --- This episode is brought to you by Hims. Visit hims.com/wingedwheel for your personalized hair loss treatment options. Support the show: Patreon.com/WingedWheelPodcast Head over to wingedwheelpodcast.com to find all the ways to listen, how to support the show, and so much more!

Anusha Iyer is a first generation immigrant, born in India. She moved to the states with her family, when her Dad was going grad school at Ohio State. She fondly remembers sitting on her Dad's shoulders for Buckeyes football games, as he was fan enough for the whole family. Outside of her professional life, she has 2 kids in college who were coding since they could walk - but neither of which ended up in computer science. She loves to cook, and notes that she is not a recipe follower - she likes to use whatever is at her fingertips.Anusha has been in the cybersecurity space for quite some time, starting off in naval research in DC. Further down here career, she had a friend reach out to pitch an idea to build a platform for dynamic machine identification.This is the creation story of Corsha.SponsorsUnblockedTECH DomainsMezmoBraingrid.aiLinkshttps://corsha.com/https://www.linkedin.com/in/anusha-iyer/Our Sponsors:* Check out Cash App and use my code CASHAPP10 for a great deal: https://click.cash.app/ui6m/mt82fpxl #CashAppPod. Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partner(s). Prepaid debit cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC. See terms and conditions at https://cash.app/legal/us/en-us/card-agreement. Cash App Green, overdraft coverage, borrow, cash back offers and promotions provided by Cash App, a Block, Inc. brand. Visit http://cash.app/legal/podcast for full disclosures.* Check out Plaud AI and use my code CODESTORY for a great deal: https://plaud.aiAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

What are the 4Qs? (1) Three favorite films. (2) An underrated film. (3) An overrated film. (4) A lesser-known film people should seek out. Vidhya Iyer wrote and directed the short film, “Giving Mom the Talk,” which was a SOFF 2025 Official Selection and earned the Grand Jury Award – Best Short Film – Comedy AND the Filmmakers Award – Outstanding Director – Short Film – Comedy. I hope you enjoyed getting know know Vidhya as much as I did and you’re back for a little more with the 4 Questions! If you want to know even more, please follow her at @heyiyer  or @tingifilms _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Discover Indie Film Links DIF Podcast Website – DIF Instagram – DIF BlueSky Discover Indie Film Foundation (nonprofit for the arts) Website Sherman Oaks Film Festival Film Invasion Los Angeles

Welcome back, Film Friends! Vidhya Iyer wrote and directed the short film, “Giving Mom the Talk,” which was a SOFF 2025 Official Selection and earned the Grand Jury Award – Best Short Film – Comedy AND the Filmmakers Award – Outstanding Director – Short Film – Comedy. Vidya wasn’t able to attend the festival because she was traveling in India so I was very excited to get to know her a little bit with this great chat we had. If you want to know more, please follow her at @heyiyer  or @tingifilms _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Discover Indie Film Links DIF Podcast Website – DIF Instagram – DIF BlueSky Discover Indie Film Foundation (nonprofit for the arts) Website Sherman Oaks Film Festival Film Invasion Los Angeles

For middle-class Indians, the home is becoming a statement of who they are. Customisation and premiumisation are key trends across cities. But the home interiors market remains a complex maze; it is unorganised, fragmented and the costs are opaque. In this episode, Homelane Co-founder and CEO Srikanth Iyer shares his experience with host Gaurav Choudhury on building structure and reliability to India's interiors market and reveals how in this space too AI and digitisation is transforming the traditional way of doing business.

Bengal Border has Started Changing - Amazing Suvendu | PM's Appeal & Situation | NEET | Abhijit Iyer

Check out BeerBiceps SkillHouse Courses Here - https://www.bbskillhouse.comFor all BeerBiceps vlog content Watch Life Of BeerBiceps - https://www.youtube.com/@LifeOfBeerBicepsCheck out my Mind Performance app: Level SuperMindLink:- https://level4665.u9ilnk.me/d/F1ZOZV4OnTShare your guest suggestions hereMail - connect@beerbiceps.comLink - https://forms.gle/aoMHY9EE3Cg3Tqdx9Join the Level Community Here:https://linktr.ee/levelsupermindcommunityFollow BeerBiceps SkillHouse's Social Media Handles:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BeerBicepsSkillHouseInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/beerbiceps_skillhouseWebsite : https://beerbicepsskillhouse.inFor any other queries EMAIL: support@beerbicepsskillhouse.comIn case of any payment-related issues, kindly write to support@tagmango.comFollow Abhijit Iyer Mitra's Social Media Handles:-Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abhijitiyermitra/X:https://x.com/Iyervval In this special episode 503rd of The Ranveer Show, we are joined by Abhijit Iyer Mitra, who shares deep insights on Human History, Global Violence, Anthropology, and Civilizational Evolution. This episode takes you into the dark and brutal truths of the human species, exploring how violence has shaped the world we live in today.In this conversation with Abhijit Iyer Mitra, we talk about the History of Violence, the Stone Age transition to the Iron Age, Cannibalism, Human Sacrifice, and the Pre-Columbian Americas. We also understand the origins of Monotheism, the Pork & Beef Taboos, and the Gunpowder Revolution.This episode also covers the Brutality of Native American Tribes, Cannibalism in Papua New Guinea, the Truth about African History, the Bronze Age Collapse, and the Evolution of Human Institutions.This English podcast is a valuable resource for anyone interested in History, Global Politics, Human Nature, Evolutionary Psychology, and the Dark Side of Human Civilization.(00:00) – Start of the episode(01:10) – Why History is taught wrongly(02:03) – Humans: A Psychotic Species?(05:31) – Reality of War & Modern Cities(09:22) – The "Noble Savage" Myth Debunked(11:49) – America: A 15,000-Year Time Capsule(19:39) – The Dark Truth of Shaka Zulu(23:30) – The Politics of the Slave Trade(27:40) – Tin: The Petroleum of the Bronze Age(33:23) – Why History Rhymes (Mark Twain)(36:54) – The 1177 BC World Collapse(45:28) – The Real Origins of the Bible(52:35) – Logic Behind Pork & Beef Taboos(1:01:11) – History of Human Cannibalism(1:12:21) – Rise of Illiterate Superpowers(1:18:43) – The Brutality of Human Sacrifice(1:26:41) – Scary Trip to Papua New Guinea(1:32:07) – Meeting Living Cannibal Tribes(1:43:32) – How Church Bells Created Cannons(2:01:11) – The Hard Truth About Africa(2:16:23) – Why War is a Force for Good(2:18:41) – End of the episode

A program manager told Sriram Iyer it would take 6 to 9 months to ship the first slice of their new product. Sriram challenged the team to do it in just five days. At first, they laughed. Then he rolled his sleeves up, dug in with the team, and they did it. 5 days, from Monday to Friday. Sriram has spent his career walking into companies like Salesforce, Adobe, and Freshworks, and pulling timelines apart. He calls himself the simplifier in chief, and the secret isn't the AI tooling. It's everything underneath the AI tooling that most leaders won't actually do. That's what make teams trust, and follow, him. In this episode, Sriram breaks down exactly how that five-day sprint worked, including: The "thinnest slice of pizza" principle that kills scope creep before it starts Why AI made it possible — but isn't really the point How to find the team members in any org who are actually ready to just make stuff happen — and why mindset matters more than tooling And why none of this works without trust, prioritization, taste, and an executive willing to get in the weeds and take personal responsibility for the outcome Links LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sriramviyer/ Follow LaunchPod on YouTube We have a new YouTube page! Watch full episodes of our interviews with PM leaders and subscribe! What does LogRocket do? LogRocket's Galileo AI watches user sessions for you and surfaces the technical and usability issues holding back your web and mobile apps. Understand where your users are struggling by trying it for free at LogRocket.com.Special Guest: Sriram Iyer.

Let's talk about building a positive workplace culture. What does it take to build a workplace where people truly own their work — not just show up for it? Anusha Iyer, Founder and CEO of Corsha, joins Toni to share the unfiltered journey from software engineer to CTO to CEO — and the leadership philosophy that underpins everything she's built along the way. Corsha secures machine-to-machine communications for the operational systems that run our world, from AI agents to robotic controllers in critical infrastructure. It's deep tech solving some of the most important and underprotected problems in cybersecurity today. But this conversation isn't just about technology. It's about ownership culture, the realities of founding a company as a woman, how to pivot without destroying your team, and why joy at work isn't a soft concept — it's a strategic one. Anusha also gets into the AI thread that's running through every organisation right now: why diverse voices need to be shaping these tools while the models are still being trained, and why using AI as an assistant rather than a replacement is a leadership decision, not just a preference. What we cover: The real financial and personal cost of starting a startup — and why it's worth it How to make strategic pivots without flip-flopping and exhausting your team The power of saying no — to customers, to money, to scope creep Building a positive workplace culture through ownership: the Joy at Work framework The CTO-to-CEO transition: what changes, what doesn't, and the vulnerability that makes it work Why the E in CEO stands for evangelist — and what that means for how you lead Communication training for the whole team, not just the C-suite AI as an assistant, not a replacement — and why women need to be in these tools now The 100% job spec problem — and the mindset shift women need to make Why diverse voices matter in AI training right now, while it still counts Connect with Anusha and Corhsa: https://corsha.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/anusha-iyer/  Resources mentioned in this episode Read the book Joy At Work by Dennis W. Bakke Emma Wainer, public speaking coach: https://www.linkedin.com/in/emmawainer/  Listen to Emma on the Podcast:  Episode 107 - Being a great communicator with Emma Wainer Book a strategy call with Toni: tonicollis.com/lets-chat    This episode was sponsored by our guest, Anusha Iyer. Thank you Anusha & Corsha for helping to bring Leading Women in Tech to this community!  

On a recent wintry afternoon in Manhattan, Stephan Crump was doing what he has done countless times in the city—toting his upright bass, clad in a heavy black bag, along the sidewalk, as if he had a baby that was also a bear.  Finding his car, Crump shimmied the instrument through the minivan's side, climbed into the front seat, exhaled, and then grinned. In less than 24 hours, he would fly to Portland to teach “On Magnetism,” a long-accreting class on connecting more deeply with yourself and others through your instrument, and to play solo at the city's jazz festival. But he knew he first needed to make the 40-minute trek from Brooklyn to Finlay + Gage, the legendary bass shop in Tribeca, to have his bass adjusted, so that he could make that connection himself. The sound post—that stout wooden dowel inside the bass that keeps it from collapsing on itself, and that the French call l'âme, or the soul—wasn't sitting quite right. “It's so personal, elusive, and mysterious. Yes, it's a mechanical thing, but it has so much mojo to it. That's why it's called ‘the soul,'” Crump explained several days later from Portland, noting that the hassle of the errand had been worth it. The bass felt good in his hands again. “It's this combination of sound and feel.” For a quarter-century now, pairing sound and feel have become Crump's ambit and expertise. A bassist and composer, collaborator and bandleader, Crump has become one of New York's most steadfast and experienced instrumentalists. He was the anchor of Vijay Iyer's foundational trio for 20 years, even as he developed a slew of imaginative ensembles of his own—the two-guitar Rosetta Trio, the Borderlands Trio alongside Kris Davis and Eric McPherson, the Secret Keeper duo with Mary Halvorson, just to sample. In all of these contexts, the act of bringing the rest of his life to the bass—the trauma and hope, the frustration and delight—remains Crump's primary motivation. It is, if you will, the soul of his playing. “All art is an expression of the artist's presence in that moment. Musicians need our evolving physical capabilities on the instrument and technical knowledge—how notes interact harmonically and melodically, transcribing our heroes, learning all that,” Crump said. “But in the act of making music, we need to allow that stuff to fall away, to not impose it on the music, to relinquish our defenses. We are sculpting energy as we make music, shaping magnetism.” In some ways, Crump's career is the fulfillment of his father's own youthful ambition. His dad toyed with turning pro as a jazz drummer, but he pursued architecture instead. (That's also how he met Crump's mother, who comes from a long line of French architects.) His devotion to jazz, though, didn't waver, and he would constantly play jazz classics—Monk, Miles, Coltrane, MJQ—in the family's Memphis home. Crump thinks that's where he fell for the bass, especially when the low-end would creep through old wooden walls at night. At his mother's behest, though, Crump's training started with piano, the Suzuki Method leading him through the classics and eventually to his all-time musical hero, Stevie Wonder. But at 13, Crump finally got his first bass, a MapleGlo Rickenbacker 4001 like that of another hero, Yes' Chris Squire. He joined a crackling power trio with his brother, later enlisted in a larger band, and then started his own group; they all gigged hard. Backpacking through Spain by himself after high school, however, he encountered an epiphany by the name of Dave Holland, playing in his mighty and future-facing quartet. The upright bass: That was Crump's future. His first was a dilapidated plywood model, collecting dust in a corner of Amherst College, where he'd in part gone to escape family turmoil down south. He'd intended to study physics and music, but he soon realized that his energy and enthusiasm belonged with the latter. That was helped along by a guitarist pal Crump met during his first few weeks at Amherst. He had connections in the West Village. Crump had the car. (“The bassist,” he half-joked, “always has the car.”) Most every week, they would drive the four hours south, link with high-caliber New York pros they'd hired, play until 2 a.m. or so, and head back to school. “That was really powerful and clarifying. It was thrilling to be 18 and gigging in New York. I got a taste for that level of musicianship, and I was doing more than just cutting it,” he said, smiling. “By the end of my first semester, I knew I was moving to New York as soon as I graduated.” That is precisely what Crump did. He used his paycheck from a month-long, fresh-out-of-college stint with the Tommy Dorsey Orchestra to rent his first Brooklyn apartment in 1994. He dove right in, roving the West Village with his bass, listening, and joining late-night jams that ended with the sun's arrival. He'd seal his shades with tape, sleep, and repeat.  Crump, though, bristled at the scene's pervasive machismo, how some of the city's most vaunted players would put up walls to prevent revealing too much of themselves through their music. That's actually what he craved. Crump found others who shared his ardor, earnestness, and a belief in what jazz could show of and to a person. Those people, like saxophonists Chris Cheek and Miguel Zenón, helped shape his first albums. There was film score work and sessions and stages alongside singer-songwriters. In these concentric creative circles, he met a young singer, Jen Chapin, and fell in love. They got married in September 1999.  After five years, the existence Crump had imagined for himself as a New York musician was happening. “My goal from the start was to come to New York and make a life in music—to make music that I loved, to learn and grow with amazing musicians,” said Crump. “I never set out to be a rock star, a jazz star. I just wanted to make music—real, deep, honest shit, you know?” Actually, Crump flirted with something at least like “jazz stardom” during a 20-year stint in Vijay Iyer's trio. Iyer cold-called Crump soon after moving to New York in 1999, on a friend's recommendation. They spent the next 20 years building the band into one of modern jazz's most successful units. It was a tremendous trip, of course, but it was again clarifying for Crump, revealing the sorts of bands he wanted to build outside of the Iyer orbit. He steadily realized that traditional jazz ensembles were not his preferred vehicle. The bass could get lost, its role restricted. And the power dynamics with such a clear and visible leader created an environment of dominance (again, often masculine) that he hoped to avoid. “Control and bravado keep you from deeper layers of experience and expression,” he said. “When you find yourself with a group of people who are willing to at least attempt ego dissolution and real communion, you have the opportunity for transcendence. You open a portal for each other and the audience—that's a service to society.” Crump has found those connections in so many contexts, emptying his feelings into his diverse ensembles. Rosetta Trio's bittersweet groove, for instance, emerged from little Fender Rhodes fragments he compiled in the months after watching 9/11 unfold with Jen from their Brooklyn roof. Open Wide, his 2002 set of duets with her, are intimate and entangled portraits of marriage's first few difficult, delightful years.  The music of Rhombal—his celebrated quartet with Tyshawn Sorey, Adam O'Farrill, Ellery Eskelin—unfolded after the death of his brother, Patrick, the one who first brought him into a band back in Memphis. And Slow Water, his latest project built with a drum-less sextet of fascinating New York artists, hinges on the Memphis native's experiences with bodies of water around the world, his lifelong love of nature, and his worry about and hope for our collective future.    “The acoustic bass is almost infinite as an instrument, sonically and expressively, but so much of that can get covered up in a traditional ensemble,” he said, turning toward his duos with saxophonist Steve Lehman and guitarist Mary Halvorson. “Those experiences gave me so much more room to explore the terrain of the instrument, its possibilities. That pushes you. It's the kind of scary environment you want to put yourself in.” When Crump talks about and teaches music, he doesn't discuss notes. Or rather, they are only the beginning, the technical basis for something that can and should be something much richer. Notes are vessels that the player then fills with their experiences, their ideas, their emotions, their essence.  These are gestures, at least as he has put it for many years now, the basis of the music he wants to put into and get out of the world. In some significant ways, this echoes his childhood in Memphis, where his Southern grandmother instilled the value of a story well told, and where he worked alongside his uncle building furniture—really, sculptures of wood—that they would sand until the material seemed somehow to shimmer. (Crump's music stand was made by his uncle, Stephen.) It wasn't just an object or a story; it was a piece of work you invested yourself in until it became art. “A note is an abstract notion, meaningless without all of the human, spiritual stuff you can channel into it,” Crump said. “A gesture has the physical element, a sense of offering, a reflection of our presence through each unfolding moment.” 

West Bengal & Tamil Nadu Opinion Poll ft. Dhirendra Pundir, Sree Iyer

Die Punjab Kings het die Mumbai Indians met sewe paaltjies afgeransel, hul onoorwonne segetog voortgesit en is nou boaan die Indiese Premierliga se punteleer. Quinton de Kock het ʼn onoorwonne 112 van 60 balle behaal en bygedra tot Mumbai se 195 vir ses. Daarna het Prabhsimran Singh ʼn onoorwonne 80 van 39 balle aangeteken en deel ʼn vennootskap van 139 lopies met kaptein Shreyas Iyer. Dit het Punjab se oorwinning met 21 balle oor verseker. Iyer loof sy boulers wat Mumbai tot minder as 200 beperk het:

- Get NordVPN with a special discount - https://www.nordvpn.com/goodareas - Get an exclusive 15% discount on Saily data plans! Use code 'goodareas' at checkout. Download Saily app or go to: https://saily.com/goodareas - Akshay Kumaraswamy, Jarrod Kimber and Shayan Ahmed Khan share their opinions and debate whether releasing Shreyas Iyer was the right call by Kokata Knightriders. - - To support the podcast please go to our Patreon page -  https://www.patreon.com/c/goodareaspodcast  - Head over to commbox.tv to learn more about our network. - This podcast is edited and mixed by Ishit Kuberkar,    he's at https://instagram.com/ishitk86 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Mamata in Big Trouble | Trump wants to Exit Iran | Tsunami in Assam | Abhijit Iyer Mitra

Eighty years after Indian independence, the economic fingerprint of British colonial rule is still visible at the district level. Two institutions in particular left scars: whether a district was governed directly by British administrators or by one of India's roughly 680 Indian princes, and what kind of land tax arrangement the British put in place. For example, by 1991, directly ruled districts had nine percentage points fewer middle schools and a 20-percentage-point lower probability of having a road than areas under indirect rule. The question was whether those gaps would eventually close.Lakshmi Iyer of the University of Notre Dame tells Tim Phillips that by 2011 infrastructure gaps had closed completely. Targeted post-independence programmes, including the Minimum Needs Program of the 1970s and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan of 2001, pushed schools, health centres, and roads towards underserved districts. The picture for land tenure is mixed. Areas that historically had landlord-based systems are still 17% behind non-landlord areas in wheat yields, and the gap in fertiliser use has widened rather than narrowed. One reason, the policy response was a universal subsidy rather than being specifically aimed at places that had fallen behind.So colonial legacies can be erased, but only by policies designed to reach the places that were left behind. When policies have equalisation built in, historical gaps disappear. When they do not, the gaps persist.The research behind this episode:Iyer, Lakshmi and Coleson Weir. 2025. "The colonial legacy in India: How persistent are the effects of historical institutions?" Journal of Development Economics 177.To cite this episode:Phillips, Tim and Lakshmi Iyer. 2026. "The colonial legacy in India: How persistent are the effects of historical institutions?" VoxDev Talk (podcast).Assign this as extra listening: the citation above is formatted and ready for a reading list or VLE.About Lakshmi IyerLakshmi Iyer is Professor of Economics at the University of Notre Dame and a Research Fellow at CEPR. Her research focuses on political economy, governance, and the long-run effects of historical institutions in developing countries. The paper discussed in this episode extends two of her earlier papers, one co-authored with Abhijit Banerjee and one sole-authored, both of which are listed in the research cited section below. Research cited in this episodeIyer, Lakshmi. 2010. "Direct versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India: Long-Term Consequences." Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (4). The original paper documenting that areas brought under direct British rule had significantly lower access to schools, health centres, and roads in the post-colonial period, using Lord Dalhousie's Doctrine of Lapse as an instrument for the selectivity of British annexation.Banerjee, Abhijit V. and Lakshmi Iyer. 2005. "History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India." American Economic Review 95 (4). Finds that districts where the British assigned proprietary rights in land to landlords have significantly lower agricultural investment and productivity in the post-independence period than areas where rights went to individual cultivators.Nunn, Nathan. 2007. "Historical Legacies: A Model Linking Africa's Past to its Current Underdevelopment." Journal of Development Economics 83 (1). Develops the theoretical case for why economies displaced into a low-production equilibrium by extraction or oppression can remain there long after the original impetus disappears.More VoxDev Talks on this topicIndia's economic development since independence: Devesh Kapur and Arvind Subramanian discuss how India's transformation across eight decades of independence has defied conventional models of development, and what it reveals about the relationship between political economy and growth.Related reading on VoxDevDrawing the line: The short- and long-term consequences of partitioning India: examines the economic and political legacy of the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent, and how a boundary drawn in the final weeks of empire continues to shape outcomes on both sides.Historical legacies and African development: surveys the evidence on how pre-colonial political organisation, colonial-era institutions, and the slave trade have shaped the long-run economic geography of sub-Saharan Africa.

Ajay K Raina, Rajiv Narayanan, RSN Singh,Abhijit Chavda,Abhijit Iyer|India Winner in Global Conflict

“Marty Supreme” stars Timothée Chalamet as a young, brash table tennis player in the 1950s trying to hustle his way to a world championship. One of the characters standing in Marty's way is played by frequent guest, Pico Iyer, a TED speaker and travel writer who'd never acted before. In this bonus episode, Iyer shares how a TED talk unexpectedly landed him the role and reflects on how this simple game can teach us to play with someone, not just against them.This bonus episode was released early on TED Radio Hour+. Listeners there get access to regular bonus episodes (like this one) as well as all of our episodes, sponsor-free. That's because with Plus, you directly support our work and public radio. You can join at plus.npr.org/ted.To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below:See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Dubai, Oman, American Bases, Qatar Face Iran's Brunt | Pak - Afg was a Decoy? | Abhijit Iyer Mitra

Community Notes Crisis in BJP | RSS vs AB | Mani Shankar Iyer Roasts Rahul | Yogi | Karan Verma

This special edition Detroit Red Wings podcast brings the whole crew together for a roundtable discussion! Hockeytown news and analysis covers the team's season to date, current playoff position, and what's needed from Yzerman and the players to make the playoffs. (00:00) - Full Roundtable Intro Ryan, Brad, Evan, Max Bultman, and Prashanth Iyer break down this special State of the Union episode. (03:45) - Season Analysis Deep Dive How the Red Wings avoided the streaky patterns of previous years - no consecutive games without a point since November creates playoff stability. (11:20) - Warning Signs Discussion Dylan Larkin's recent struggles and identifying areas where the team hasn't fired on all cylinders yet this season. Also, how key players like Lucas Raymond and Patrick Kane factor in on offense, and the effect of Simon Edvinsson's injury and Axel Sandin-Pellikka's learning on defense. (19:40) - Steve Yzerman Trade Strategy Breaking down the GM's approach to the trade deadline with the team in playoff position for the first time in years. (32:20) - Trade Targets Breakdown Specific players and positions the Red Wings should target to bolster their playoff chances. (52:15) - Key Player Storylines Moritz Seider's breakout season, John Gibson's resurgence, Alex DeBrincat's scoring, and other individual performances driving team success. (1:05:15) - Playoff Keys & March Outlook What the Red Wings need to maintain their position and make a legitimate postseason run. --- WWP Night at the LCA Night (March 21st) tickets at wingedwheelpodcast.com/redwings Support the show: Patreon.com/WingedWheelPodcast Head over to wingedwheelpodcast.com to find all the ways to listen, how to support the show, and so much more!

Dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) is a rare vascular condition where abnormal connections (fistulas) form between branches of arteries and veins in the dura mater, the brain's covering. The dural arteries deliver high-pressure, oxygen-rich blood to the brain, while the dural veins return deoxygenated, low-pressure blood to the heart. DAVF causes high-pressure arterial blood to flow into veins or sinuses meant for low-pressure blood, which can lead to ruptures, brain hemorrhages, and other neurological issues.Meet Dr. Aditya (Adi) Iyer, a board-certified, fellowship-trained neurosurgeon specializing in vascular diseases of the brain and spine at Pacific Neuroscience Institute®. As one of California's few dual-trained neurosurgeons, Dr. Iyer offers both minimally invasive open surgical techniques and incisionless catheter-based procedures to treat strokes, aneurysms, AVMs, tumors, and pain.

In this episode of That's So Hindu, Mat McDermott interviews Ravi Rajan, producer of the documentary “Castegate” and Sundar Iyer, one of the engineers at the center of Cisco caste discrimination case. The conversation delves into the allegations of caste discrimination, the subsequent documentary that was produced to document the events, and the broader implications of caste discrimination in the US. The speakers discuss the egregious claims made by the California Civil Rights Department, the political mobilization against Hindu Americans, and the legislative context surrounding SB 403. They emphasize the need for community awareness and action against discrimination, while also highlighting the importance of ethical leadership in politics.Watch: https://castegatethefilm.org/ TakeawaysThe Cisco case involves allegations of caste discrimination and harassment.The documentary aims to document the truth behind the Cisco case.There are significant misrepresentations in the claims made by the California Civil Rights Department.Political mobilization against Hindu Americans is a growing concern.Caste discrimination is being used as a tool to target Hindu Americans.The Civil Rights Department's actions raise ethical questions about government agencies.SB 403 was introduced to address caste discrimination but has controversial implications.Community reception of the documentary has been positive, with awards received.Calls for donations are crucial to support the ongoing efforts related to the film.The fight against discrimination is a collective responsibility for all Americans.Chapters00:00Overview of the Cisco Case02:56The Film's Development and Purpose05:57Behind the Scenes: Documenting the Truth08:39Egregious Claims and Misrepresentation11:42Speculation on Broader Agendas14:45Caste and Identity: A Complex Discussion17:31Statistical Misuse and Its Implications20:52Community Reception and Future Plans23:34Reflections on Pushback and Advocacy28:31Ethical Responsibilities of Leaders31:25Legal Challenges and Civil Rights34:44Caste Discrimination and Legal Implications37:47Racial Dynamics and Social Commentary39:57Cultural Shifts and Societal Reactions43:53Examining Harassment Claims46:31The Allegations of Isolation47:34The Possibility of a Setup49:30Coincidences and Causation50:56Understanding SB 40353:45The Implications of Caste Legislation56:35Political Ethics and Accountability58:40The Broader Campaign Against Hindu Americans01:03:54Calls to Action and Community SupportKeywordsCisco case, caste discrimination, documentary, civil rights, SB 403, Hindu American community, political mobilization, legal implications, anti-Hindu sentiment Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

“When I tell you a story about my body, I cannot separate it from a story about water. And a story about water is also a story about family. And a story about family is rooted in the earth…,” opens Sangamithra Iyer’s Governing Bodies. What does it mean for a memoir to assume the elusive, ever-changing shape of water, to be the story of family but where the notion of family crosses the boundaries of blood, culture, nation and even species? Governing Bodies, as the Whiting judges said in their citation, is “a subtle, meditative exploration on grief and nonviolence, an international and intergenerational voyage through shared histories and a consideration of what we owe to each other and the natural world.” For the bonus audio archive, Sangu contributes a reading of her remarkable essay “Are You Willing?” which originally appeared in the anthology Writing for Animals: New Perspectives for Writers & Instructors to Educate & Inspire. This joins an ever-growing archive of contributions from past guests—from Richard Powers to adrienne maree brown, Forrest Gander to Arthur Sze, Natalie Diaz to Ada Limón. You can find out how to access the bonus audio and about the many other potential benefits and rewards to choose from, when you join the Between the Covers community as a listener-supporter, at the show’s Patreon page. Finally, here is today’s BookShop.

Reading of excerpts from Dr Raghavan's essay 'Consciousness and Existence'. The full text can be found here: ⁠https://theosophytrust.org/⁠Professor Raghavan N. Iyer (1930 -1995) was an internationally known philosopher, political theorist, and spiritual practitioner who devoted his life to the intellectual and spiritual uplift of human society. The only Rhodes Scholar from India in 1950 to Oxford, he secured First Class Honors in Philosophy, Politics and Economics and later earned a D. Phil. Degree in moral and political philosophy. He was professor of political philosophy at the University of California, Santa Barbara for 21 years.His message is that a renewed humankind is now emerging, and his writings address the causes of the global situation, the nature of this evolution, and the manner in which individuals can participate fully in this collective transformation.Dr Iyer was a practitioner and member of the Theosophical Foundation and wrote that:"Initiation into Theosophical metaphysics is more than an intellectual or moral enterprise; it is a continuous spiritual exercise in the development of intuitive and cognitive capacities that are the highest available to humans, a process that includes from the first a blending of the head and the heart through the interaction of viveka and vairagya, discrimination and detachment.

We gorge ourselves on the internet, smartphones, social media, information overload — all of it constantly sap us of our emotional and intellectual vitality. Authors Pico Iyer and Jonathan Haidt argue it's vital we disconnect from our addictive online world to pursue a fulfilling, and richer life. By curtailing the noise of technology, media and other worldly distractions there's space to reconnect with the things that matter. "Humans were never designed to live at a pace determined by machines. The only way we could begin to do that is by becoming machines ourselves," says Iyer. Pico Iyer and Jonathan Haidt were two of the marquee speakers at the 2025 Aspen Ideas Festival. The theme this year was 'What Makes Life Good.'

The Detroit Red Wings have already had their best December in a decade, and the month is only halfway over... Tune in as we start by recapping Detroit's win over Ilya Sorokin and the New York Islanders, including Alex DeBrincat's heroics and league-leading goal pace, Lucas Raymond's 3 assists, Moritz Seider continuing his award-worthy season, and Axel Sandin-Pellikka's offensive skills on display as John Gibson wins his 6th straight start (4:10). Next, Dylan Larkin & Co. fall to the Utah Mammoth as Cam Talbot, Simon Edvinsson, and more Red Wings across the board struggled, and Todd McLellan's squad failed to execute without the likes of Patrick Kane (though Finnie & Grand Rapids Griffins star John Leonard linked up for a goal) (14:45). Also, the amazing pace in Hockeytown compared to previous years & what lies ahead for the rest of 2025. After that, we discuss Jonatan Berggren being lost to the St. Louis Blues via waivers, his request to Steve Yzerman to find him a fresh start, and the failure of the 2018 Red Wings Draft Class by Ken Holland & Tyler Wright (Zadina, Veleno, Berggren, etc.) (29:10). We then are joined by Prashanth Iyer to go over the ramifications of Steve Yzerman and the Detroit Red Wings not trading for Quinn Hughes, what's needed to make the most of Dylan Larkin, Alex DeBrincat, Lucas Raymond, Moritz Seider, Simon Edvinsson, Nate Danielson, Marco Kasper, Axel Sandin-Pellikka, Sebastian Cossa, Trey Augustine, & the rest of Detroit's future. Also, Prashanth's campaign for Moritz Seider to not only get Norris Trophy votes, but also Hart Trophy votes (41:10). All of that & lots more before we take your questions and comments in our Overtime segment (1:14:05) - enjoy! Head over to wingedwheelpodcast.com to find all the ways to listen, how to support the show, and so much more! Go to KoffeeKult.com and use code WWP for 15% off your order! #ad Support the Jamie Daniels Foundation through Wings Money on the Board: https://www.wingedwheelpodcast.com/wingsmotb