Podcasts about Astron

España ha esperado más de un siglo para tener un eclipse total de sol en la península ibérica. Y entre 2026 y 2028 tendrá tres eclipses, dos de ellos totales, algo extraordinariamente raro.

Esmeralda Ruiz entrevista a Javier Armentia, astrofísico y Director del Planetario de Pamplona.

Con Carmen Morodo, Javier Caraballo y Pablo Pombo

Comentamos la actualidad del momento con Matías Vallés y Arturo Lezcano desde Mallorca y A Coruña, puntos final e inicial del eclipse. Javier Coronas denuncia la saturación de información relacionada con el eclipse a la que nos hemos sometido durante las últimas semanas. Hablamos con Jorge Rivero, astrofísico y coordinador del proyecto 'Eclipse inclusivo' que permitirá a las personas ciegas escuchar el eclipse. Luis Alonso, alcalde de Quintanarraya (Burgos) y presidente de la Asociación Astronómica Sierra de la Demanda, nos cuenta cómo se están preparando en la localidad para ver el evento atronómico. Entrevistamos a Alba Meijide, joven ingeniera y asesora en Inteligencia Artificial que ha trabajado con todo tipo de empresas e instituciones como la Unión Europea, en 30x30.

Con Carmen Morodo, Javier Caraballo y Pablo PomboConviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mas-noticias--4412383/support.ESCUCHAR RADIO 

Martin Pawley, de la Agrupación Astronómica IO, nos habla sobre el eclipse

El verano de Aparici: El eclipse, el evento astronómico del siglo

El verano de Aparici: El eclipse, el evento astronómico del sigloConviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mas-noticias--4412383/support.ESCUCHAR RADIO 

Entrevista a Juan José Ortuño, presidente de la Asociación Astronómica Marina Alta, sobre el eclipse solar del 12 de agosto, cómo se observará desde la comarca, los mejores lugares para verlo y las recomendaciones de seguridad.

- Los misterios de La Odisea Cíclopes, sirenas, gigantes. ¿Tienen una inspiración real? ¿Era Odiseo un personaje inspirado en alguien real? ¿Puede contener La Odisea un mapa secreto? son ciertas claves ocultas de una obra creada hace cerca de 3.000 años y que contiene misterioso sorprendentes. - Cierre observatorio Almadén de la Plata Tras 30 años el Observatorio de Almadén de la Plata en Sevilla cierra su actividad. Miguel Gilarte, Pte. de la Asociación Astronómica de España, quiere denunciar el porqué del cierre de uno de los observatorios más importantes de España. - Ataque de criaturas extrañas Desde el denominado Chupacabras a extraños seres alados, estos han sido protagonistas de ataques a humanos que no ha podido resolverse ¿o sí?

Teniu una setmana per a cercar un lloc on tingueu una bona visió de l'horitzó, i quan el trobeu ja tindreu el més important per a poder veure l'eclipsi del 12 d'agost, que a Sitges tindrà el seu moment culminant a les 20h 29min i 34s amb una visibilitat del 99,98%. Un cop trobat el lloc és absolutament imprescindible que porteu unes ulleres homologades per a poder-lo veure, i que estan disponibles a molts establiments. La visió continuada del sol pot provocar danys irreparables de visió. I a partir d'aquí, desitjar que la meteorologia acompanyi. La Rat Parellada i en Carles Schnabel, de l'observatori astronòmic del Parc del Garraf ens donen unes quantes instruccions de cara a un esdeveniment astronòmic que ha generat expectativa. L'entrada D’aquí una setmana, a dos quarts de nou del vespre, l’eclipsi total. Des de l’observatori astronòmic del Garraf ens donen uns quants consells ha aparegut primer a Radio Maricel.

Los eclipses totales son acontecimientos de profundo impacto emocional, una esquiva carambola cósmica en la que la Luna bloquea completamente el Sol y permite apreciar las capas superiores de su atmósfera durante unos pocos minutos de noche súbita. Después de una prolongada sequía de fenómenos de este tipo, España enfila una insólita racha que nos permitirá vivir dos eclipses totales y uno anular en tres años consecutivos. El primero, el 12 de agosto de 2026, será visible como total sobre las 20.30 horas en una banda de doscientos kilómetros de anchura que barrerá buena parte de la mitad norte peninsular. Un año después, el 2 de agosto de 2027, la franja de totalidad cubrirá el extremo meridional de la Península, Ceuta y Melilla. Por último, el 26 de enero de 2028 podremos apreciar un eclipse de tipo anular desde casi cualquier ubicación al sur de la línea imaginaria que une Badajoz con Girona.La huella de los eclipses de Sol está presente desde los albores de la expresión escrita. Se cree que pudieron influir en importantes decisiones políticas en el Egipto de los faraones y fueron concienzudamente registrados por los babilonios. Además, su simbolismo queda plasmado en relatos religiosos como el eclipse de la crucifixión y sus diversas interpretaciones artísticas. El gran avance en la observación y el análisis llega con la Revolución Científica y la Ilustración; la observación de nuestra estrella y su corona durante episodios de totalidad permite avanzar en el conocimiento del astro, descubrir el helio e incluso confirmar la Teoría de la Relatividad de Albert Einstein. Entre mediados del siglo XIX y comienzos del XX nuestro país vivió una concatenación de eclipses totales semejante a la que se aproxima. Expediciones científicas de todo el mundo visitaron España para presenciarlos en 1860, 1900 y 1905.En este documental sonoro, con guion de Álvaro Soto y realización de Mayca Aguilera, participan los astrofísicos Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel, autor del libro 'Los eclipses de Sol'; Ana Belén Griñón, investigadora en el Instituto de Física Solar de la Universidad de Estocolmo; y Sandra Benítez, responsable de comunicación científica de la Agencia Espacial Europea (ESA). Intervienen también los astrónomos Alba Vidal, del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional; Rafael Bachiller, director de dicha institución y presidente de la Comisión Científica y de Asesoramiento del Trío de Eclipses; y Pedro García Lario, miembro de esta misma comisión por parte de la ESA. Además, el programa recoge las impresiones de la investigadora del CNIO Sara García Alonso, integrante de la reserva de astronautas de la ESA; Pedro Ruiz-Castell, profesor de historia de la ciencia en la Universitat de València; y Enrique Bordallo, presidente de la Asociación Astronómica de Burgos.Escuchar audio

Are you sick of people being stuck in buildings with vinyl flooring and concrete block walls? Well too bad, cuz we've got another batch of poor souls fighting off a death cult and Lovecraftian monsters in this week's pick, THE VOID (2016). This one just turned 10, so we're celebrating with a rewatch and a fresh perspective on Astron-6 movies. Is it an entirely new concept? Of course not, but it packs a body horror punch and has incredible low-budget practical effects so we all walked away happy. The same can't be said for the characters in the film, though… ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Join our Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Buy Some Merch⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Join our Facebook Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow us on Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check our Letterboxd⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

El próximo 12 de agosto de 2026 España vivirá un acontecimiento histórico: el primer eclipse total de Sol visible desde la península en más de un siglo. Pero... ¿qué hace tan especial a este eclipse? ¿Dónde podrá verse como eclipse total? ¿A qué hora comenzará? ¿Merece la pena desplazarse para disfrutar de la totalidad? ¿Qué ocurre exactamente durante esos minutos en los que el Sol desaparece tras la Luna? En este episodio de El Podcast de los Consumidores, hablamos con Mario Tafalla García, astrónomo e investigador del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (OAN), que nos explica de forma sencilla todo lo que necesitas saber para disfrutar de este fenómeno único. Además, desde el punto de vista del consumidor, resolvemos las dudas más importantes sobre la seguridad al observar un eclipse:

El próximo 12 de agosto de 2026 España vivirá un acontecimiento histórico: el primer eclipse total de Sol visible desde la península en más de un siglo. Pero... ¿qué hace tan especial a este eclipse? ¿Dónde podrá verse como eclipse total? ¿A qué hora comenzará? ¿Merece la pena desplazarse para disfrutar de la totalidad? ¿Qué ocurre exactamente durante esos minutos en los que el Sol desaparece tras la Luna? En este episodio de El Podcast de los Consumidores, hablamos con Mario Tafalla García, astrónomo e investigador del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (OAN), que nos explica de forma sencilla todo lo que necesitas saber para disfrutar de este fenómeno único. Además, desde el punto de vista del consumidor, resolvemos las dudas más importantes sobre la seguridad al observar un eclipse: 🔭 Qué son la banda de totalidad y la fase de totalidad. 🕶️ Qué gafas debes utilizar y cómo comprobar que son homologadas. 👁️ Qué riesgos existen para la vista si observas el Sol sin protección. 📍 Dónde se verá mejor el eclipse en España. ⏰ A qué hora comenzará y cuánto durará. 📸 Cómo hacer fotografías sin dañar tus ojos ni tus equipos. 🌤️ Qué hacer si el cielo está nublado. En la descripción del episodio encontrarás también enlaces a los contenidos de OCU con recomendaciones prácticas para disfrutar del eclipse con seguridad y evitar errores que pueden provocar lesiones oculares. 🎙️ Invitado: Mario Tafalla García, astrónomo e investigador del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (OAN). https://eclipses.ign.es/ Escucha el episodio y prepárate para vivir uno de los acontecimientos astronómicos más importantes de las últimas décadas. 👉 Más información y consejos en www.ocu.org #EclipseSolar #Eclipse2026 #EclipseTotal #12Agosto2026 #Astronomía #ObservatorioAstronómicoNacional #MarioTafalla #OCU #Podcast #PodcastDeLosConsumidores #SeguridadVisual #GafasEclipse #Ciencia #DivulgaciónCientífica #España

Quem aprecia observar o céu terá uma oportunidade especial nesta sexta-feira (17), em Criciúma. O Parque Astronômico Municipal Albert Einstein realiza uma sessão gratuita de observação da conjunção entre a Lua e o planeta Vênus, fenômeno que poderá ser acompanhado a partir das 18h com o auxílio de telescópios e orientação de professores da instituição. Em entrevista à Rádio Cruz de Malta FM, a gerente do Parque Astronômico, Emanoela Ceron, explicou que a conjunção é um efeito visual observado da Terra, quando dois astros parecem estar muito próximos no céu, embora permaneçam separados por milhões de quilômetros no espaço. "A conjunção nada mais é do que a percepção aqui da Terra de que dois astros estão aproximados. Vai parecer que a Lua e Vênus estão pertinho, mas eles estão totalmente separados lá no espaço, por milhões de quilômetros", explicou. Segundo Emanoela, a Lua estará na fase crescente e Vênus — conhecido popularmente como Estrela D'Alva — poderá ser visto logo após o pôr do sol, proporcionando um cenário diferenciado para os observadores. Embora o parque já ofereça sessões gratuitas de observação entre quinta-feira e domingo, das 20h às 21h, nesta sexta-feira a programação foi antecipada para permitir a visualização do fenômeno. "Vamos iniciar às 18 horas, disponibilizando os nossos professores e telescópios. Assim, as pessoas poderão observar tanto a olho nu quanto mais de perto a Lua e Vênus", destacou. A gerente ressalta que o evento é voltado para toda a família e que os visitantes também poderão levar seus próprios telescópios para receber orientações sobre o uso dos equipamentos. "É uma experiência bem bacana. Quem tem telescópio pode trazer para aprender um pouco mais com os professores. O clima está colaborando e é uma programação gratuita para toda a família."

Alicia Parente nos propone tres planes para disfrutar de la semana: Teatro clásico en Almagro, Gran Prix de Carrilanas y las estrellas en Guadalupe.

El ministro del Interior, Fernando Grande-Marlaska, reafirma su continuidad en el cargo al contar con la confianza de Pedro Sánchez, mientras comparece en la comisión del caso Koldo y niega implicación de su ministerio. La ley de regularización de migrantes genera un intenso debate nacional, con Yolanda Díaz respondiendo a las acusaciones de "ingeniería electoral" de Feijóo. El Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos asesta un revés a Donald Trump, declarando ilegal su orden de limitar la ciudadanía por nacimiento y reconociendo la de los nacidos en territorio estadounidense según la Enmienda 14. España y Europa afrontan una nueva ola de calor, y un experto explica la frecuencia de los resfriados de verano por enterovirus y cambios de temperatura. La Academia Internacional de Astronáutica actualiza su protocolo para un primer contacto alienígena, enfatizando la verificación y el consenso internacional. Finalmente, se explora la figura de Sor Patrocinio, monja del siglo XIX con estigmas, ...

-Esta noche tendremos con nosotros a un querido amigo y colaborador del programa, Pedro Juan Martín Castejón, con él hablaremos de Astrología “4 de julio, Trump y la Carta Astral de EE.UU, en el 250 cumpleaños de su declaración de Independencia” -En Historias, Cuentos y Leyendas, vamos a tener a nuestro compañero, el Investigador, Escritor y Divulgador Paco López Mengüal, que en “Vida de Santos” nos narrará la Historia de “San Ramón Novato” -Y terminaremos con un nuevo Debate, de la mano de nuestros contertulios Salvador Sandoval, Rubén Cerezo, José Ramón Sánchez y un Servidor si me dejan, debatiremos sobre un interesante y más que controvertido tema, “Los Enigmas del Antiguo Testamento” “El camino es largo y está a punto de comenzar… Compinches de la noche, poneos cómodos, agudizad las orejas que empezamos…” Por FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/Nemesis-Radio-1550831935166728/ Podcast de NEMESIS RADIO: http://www.ivoox.com/podcast-podcast-nemesis-radio_sq_f1133446_1.html CANAL MISTERIOS DE IVOOX: https://www.ivoox.com/escuchar-canal-misterios-ivoox_nq_2594_1.html Canal misterios de Ivoox: https://www.facebook.com/canalmisteriosdeIvoox/ YOU TUBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7PD6Knea7eWw88rLp0vR0w E-MAIL: nemesisradiomurcia@gmail.com Por Internet a través de nuestras webs: frecuenciamurcia.es (NEMESIS RADIO NO SE HACE RESPONSABLE DE LOS COMENTARIOS DE LOS CONTERTULIOS E INVITADOS QUE PARTICIPAN EN DICHO PROGRAMA) DIRIGEN Y PRESENTAN ANTONIO PÉREZ Y JOSÉ ANTº MARTÍNEZ

Welcome back to Gnostic Insights and to the Gnostic Reformation on Substack. Last week was part one of my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson of the Gnostic Union, and he explained to us a bit about who the Gnostic Union is and what they believe in. At the beginning of that episode, I read from the Gnostic Union website their history and mission statement. And my brother Billy called me up and said, “Oh, but there’s a point of their theology that’s all wrong. I know they’re ecumenical and all, but we mustn’t fall into the error of wrong teaching.” And, you know, I totally agree with that concept, not teaching anything that is incorrect or that doesn’t make sense, according to the Gnosticism that I share with you here. And it created a very large discussion between my brother and me. And I don’t even have enough time in this short introduction to go into the point that Bill brought up out of their statement of beliefs. So we’ll wait and we’ll do that when these interviews are all over and that way we can go into depth and give the topic the attention it deserves. You see, the Gnosticism that I share with you here mostly comes from the Tripartite Tractate of the Nag Hammadi. And the Tripartite Tractate is a very unusual book. It is not a book of mythology. It is not a book of ancient myths concerning angels and demigods and great battles in heaven and so forth. It’s not that kind of book. We think of it as physics. It’s literally a book that describes the cosmology and the cosmogony, that is, how consciousness came to be transmitted from the base state of consciousness that we call the Father or the Source, and all the way downstream into, ultimately, us. We’re sitting here talking and thinking about it. This is pure consciousness we’re talking about. It’s not particularities. You understand? Gnosis itself we think of as that river of consciousness. That’s what gnosis is. So, I often say, if my dog can’t understand the gnosis, it’s not really gnosis—it's a knowledge claim. If a blade of grass or a tree in the forest can’t bask in the gnosis, then it’s not really gnosis. It’s a human knowledge claim. This is the reason why here at Gnostic Insights and on the Gnostic Reformation, we do not dwell in the history of things. We dwell in the understanding or the gnosis itself. The cosmogony and cosmology of Gnosticism that I share with you here is a logical step-by-step rollout of the consciousness of the Father or the Source. It doesn’t really matter what you call it. It’s the base state. It’s the matrix of consciousness itself and how it flows down to us. There are necessary steps described in the Tripartite Tractate for how that consciousness is differentiated and particularized and then rolled down. And how it is that we material beings are different than the ethereal beings. How could that have possibly happened? It’s like that. It’s a logical progression that necessarily comes out of an a priori statement of consciousness as the ground state. That’s quite a bit different than mythologies of how these angels fit in with these gods and goddesses down here on earth and so forth. Because those particularities definitely come out of the mind of humans. They can be inspired. Okay, I’ll give you that. But they are knowledge claims. They’re not necessarily gnosis and because of that they can go wrong. They can be wrong. Whereas starting with this a priori notion of consciousness ending up in us and how does that occur? By what means does that possibly happen? And how is it that we earthlings plug into that illimitable consciousness? That’s a different thing. That’s a description of process. That’s an understanding or a gnosis of what it is that we are part of. 15 steps in Gnostic Cosmology So I’m not knocking the history or the particularities that Bishop Wilson shares with us. But the gnosis that leads you to enlightenment is simply this: We come from the Father [El Elyon] or from the Source or from the Mother-Father or from the Great Mother—whatever you want to call it. We come from that Source, that unlimited well of consciousness and life and power and might and love. And then we will return to that. That’s all you have to know. We come from Above and we return to Above. And with that knowledge, that’s your base state. That’s what the blades of grass and the dogs and the trees all understand. All the rest of the particularities of who and why and how, those are just details being filled in. Some of them out of gnosis, but most of them out of tradition or history. So we’ll be proceeding now into part two of my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson of the Gnostic Union. And later on, we’re going to talk some more about the difference between mythology and the process of gnosis. That is what this podcast specializes in. That’s what my brother Bill and I have parsed out and discovered out of direct mining of the Tripartite Tractate. Our gnosis comes from that and it proceeds in an orderly fashion that doesn’t require any extra research. It’s all about gnosis and what must be. But here, let’s go back to this interview with Brother Wilson. **************************************************************** Cyd: Well, tell me more about your Bible that you wrote. What do you call it? You call it… Bishop Nathan Wilson: I call it The Gnostic Christian Truth Bible. I actually asked one of the older bishops that trained me, Bishop Jason, and he started that. So, I like the name. So, I thought, okay, I want to put Gnostic Christian in there. So, I was going to call it first the Truth Bible. He requested that, but I thought, well, Gnostic Christian makes it less likely for the Catholics to come after me as well, and the Protestants. Many do not like my translations. They are quite upset that I’ve done this, but they don’t put too much light on me. So, it’s best not to give me too much attention, basically. So, the less attention I have, the less people know about this, but which is something unique about mine. I don’t just offer my translations. I offer the original Koine Greek with it, so they can look at the actual text. So, even if my translation, say, could be wrong, they could look straight at that text and go argue with the text that they see, which I also wanted to include for their own reason, and when I included the alternative English, it’s so I might read it one way, but someone else is going to read it another way, and that can teach me something new. I feel, oh, I didn’t understand it like that. So, that’s why I wanted to keep that in there too, and a couple of words I kept in there were Greek. So, I kept Logos. I kept Kosmos, Zoe, Sophia, Archon. Magus. I kept all these words. So, very, very Gnostic, and you won’t find these in the English translations. They have gone out of their ways to censor them. I also kept the word daemon or daimon, daemon, so I did not put that down as demon because that’s not what it means. So, I kept the original Greek context of use, and I also add a Greek, Koine Greek, index in my translation so people can actually look at little snippets of what these words mean. So, I have some things in here. So, this is just on one page on basically all Greek with English meaning. So, there’s Logos, which I explained means God’s word, God’s authority, God’s reasoning, song, and speech, and utterance. So, when you see Christians speak that Jesus is speaking the Word, or in the beginning there was Word, they are doing a disservice to what’s being implied. This is the word of God. Very different, and even the word God we use is very English. I did keep up, but for the English sake of things. So, English people wouldn’t freak out too much on me, and another thing is also a safer mouthful, because this Word means supreme deity, deity of deities, which is very interesting. Otherwise, we would go into a god, which is lesser gods as well. So, we have a pantheon. So, it was very different, like even monotheism would evolve into what we think it is today, but in the ancient past with ancient Jewish people, they did believe in other gods, it’s just they chose to worship one god. So, this would be not the same as monotheism now, where you completely reject them as non-existent. This wasn’t that case. So, they had a very different mind. So I kept Sophia being wisdom. I mentioned this is how this is feminine wisdom, God’s feminine wisdom, coming from the Hebrew word Chokmah. Sometimes those are called Chokmah. So, I kept that in there as Sophia. Zoe, I kept too, meaning basically when you see eternal Zoe, that’s eternal life. So, that’s implying the feminine wisdom again, but also the spiritual benefits one receives with a spiritual relationship with God, or what’s with mine. So, I kept that in there. So, it’s very feminine, and that’s being removed. They would not want you to know that life is Zoe, and there’s other words they could have used for life or soul, but they chose to use the word Zoe, and that’s important. So, I kept that in there. And I’ve also got Megas. I’ve already mentioned that, but Magus comes from—here’s two words that are entwined, but the thing was the church has used a later translation, which would be terrible, but that’s kind of wrong, and this is because the language would evolve over time. It came to words Megus and Magos, which basically would be Magi, and then great and powerful, larger than life. So, Jesus was also called Iesous Magos. So, Jesus the Great, Jesus the Wise, has been censored because of Magus, and they don’t want you to know about Simon Magus. They don’t want you to know anything about Gnosticism. So, this has been censored, and I’ve also put some passages where find this. I kept Daemon in here, or Diamon. Gehenna, I also translated in here. I kept Gehenna. I did not use hell because hell is German. It’s realm of light in German, so it’s a Germanic word. So, I kept the word Gehenna, which is ultimately what we would kind of call hell, but it’s not what people think it is. That’s an evolved tradition. So, Gehenna or even Abaddon, these are two different words, but the same thing. Gehenna was the place where the soul was destroyed or purified. So, the text can translate to eternal punishment, but that’s not strictly bound to it. That’s more would be a later theology bound to that translation where it means period of time. So, it doesn’t necessarily mean all these different things. It’s like the word soma where it’s all about Jesus’ body. It can be living body, dead body, or a carcass, or even the living body of the church, which is more symbolic, but fascinating. I also kept in here a couple words, such as I explained Hades, which is mentioned with Sheol and how that’s separate from Gehenna. I’ve kept Helios, Selene, Astron, or Asterios, as well as Aletheia. These words are very interesting because they are all gods. They’re all Greco-Roman gods. So, the scholars or, I really should say, a Christian apologist, that state there’s no pagan gods in the New Testament—they are entirely wrong. It’s just that they have looked at it in a modern Greek eye instead of looking at an ancient past—they would have seen the gods being mentioned. So that’s very interesting. So when Jesus says that the stars and the sun is falling, he’s not speaking about the sun and stars. He’s speaking about the Helios, the Roman sun god is falling, and the stars and goddesses falling, as well as Selene, the moon, so the moon goddess. That’s the falling of the pagan Roman gods that was subjecting the Jewish people. So very different theology. So theology matters. So we have to look at how people believed back these times. [Jesus speaks of the stars, moon, and sun in Matthew 24:29, Mark 13:25, Luke 21:25. Assigning them as gods and goddesses is Bishop Wilson's interpretation.] The Jewish people did not like the Romans. Not saying that all of them did not. We had some that were pro-Roman. One of the Romans that was involved in the Jewish revolt, fighting against the Jewish people, was Jewish, which is cool. And he was related to Philo of Alexandria. So very interesting. I think he might be his grandson. Cyd: Let me jump in for a second as we’re speaking about gods and the God Above All Gods versus lesser gods. Is it your thought that the God of the Jews of the Old Testament, Jehovah, is a lesser god as opposed to the God Above All Gods? Bishop Nathan Wilson: Yes. Cyd: Okay, so Jehovah is the tribal god of the Old Testament? Bishop Nathan Wilson: Yes, a bit of a mix. So there’s two gods. Well, there’s a couple, if you’ve got to go every single god being mentioned. But what they’re describing is, say, Deuteronomy 32:8, you have El Elyon dividing up the nations according to the Elohim being children of El, and Yahweh received his inheritance from the most high God. So Yahweh was more like a guardian deity, basically. He was a brother of Baal. But some Canaanites believed that Yahweh was Baal. So Yahweh kind of came later after Baal. But the first to worship Yahweh were the Sashu of Yahweh. So they were Canaanite raiders. Hebrew was also a Canaanite language.  [The earliest trace of Yahweh isn't Israelite—it's desert-born. Egyptian inscriptions speak of the “Shasu of YHW,” nomadic peoples on the edges of Canaan, sometimes regarded as raiders. It suggests the name of Yahweh may have emerged out of the wilderness before it was ever claimed by Israel. Even Hebrew itself comes out of the same Canaanite linguistic world.] So I see the views—the ones that were worshipping El would be the ones that would become the Essenes or Jewish mystics. So the Essenes worshipped El. They didn’t worship Yahweh. They viewed Yahweh as a lesser god, which is one reason they challenged the temple, because they viewed, you guys aren’t worshipping God, you’re worshipping the lesser deity, you’re worshipping an angel. And so they rejected the temple. And the priesthood was corrupt. So then you also had the Magharians or Magarites. They were first century BC era Jews. They were proto-Gnostic, so that’s a scholar term. So they were Jewish mystics. They believed that Yahweh was a demiurge and that he was a lieutenant. So not an evil demiurge, but he was ignorant of the most high Father El Elyon, but that’s not a name to them. That was just a title meaning most high God. So they didn’t believe in God with a name, the unknowable Father, they believed was beyond sex as well. So Mother-Father, basically. So beyond all things. Too perfect to interfere with matter. And they believed that the Torah had been corrupted. So that’s fascinating. So that’s a group that we want to talk about. So we had about 25 different versions of Judaism during that time with all different beliefs. So what type of Jew was Jesus? This makes a big, big difference. So not all Jews worshipped Yahweh. Some viewed him as a lesser God and some viewed him as the devil, which is whack. So the only Gnostics or proto-Gnostics would use that word devil at that time. So we have the wisdom of Solomon, which is the first text adored by Christians that they would say, look, this is our Messiah mentioning he’s a dying and rising Messiah calling himself the Son of God and he’s been crucified. So this means that just like our text, he would die a shameful death. But this text mentions that through death, the devil enters the world. So the Pharisees didn’t believe in the devil. The Sadducees didn’t either. But what’s interesting about the Pharisees and Sadducees and the Herodians, which kind of made up both these groups, they were a part of both, just the Herodians mostly supported King Herod. They believed that either King Herod was the Messiah or his family would be, or they belonged to the Sadducees and didn’t believe in a Messiah. So the Sadducees didn’t believe in angels. They didn’t believe in an afterlife. They believed once you were dead, the soul turned to dust. God was too perfect to interfere with humans. So that’s an interesting belief. But we had different subsects of Sadducees that had a different opinion to that. They believed that God did interfere with humans, but we had total free will. So they could interfere with some things, but there was no Messiah. There was no angels. So they believed that a human could be a messenger of God. That was about it. So like Moses. Then you had the Pharisees. They believed that Satan served Yahweh. His job was to test humanity or seduce humanity away from God. So that way mankind had free will. But some Pharisees didn’t believe that. They believed that Satan, Hasatan, was just symbolic for mankind’s inclination towards evil. So they didn’t believe in an evil being. So their belief was that God ordained good and evil, basically, would use evil for his own will. So that’s trippy, very trippy. So the Pharisees had a very different belief. They didn’t believe in the adversary against God. They didn’t believe in fallen angels. Later on, they would take on this belief, borrowing it from mystics and zealots. So funny enough, they would be influenced by Jesus’ teachings, such as saving a life on the Sabbath. The Pharisees would not do that. But to be fair, some Essenes wouldn’t do that either. Some Essenes were very warlike, wanting to join God’s angelic army fighting at the Armageddon of the last days of the world. But these mystics, they are the only groups that believed in fallen angels and believed in a place of punishment. The only groups. And that’s fascinating. So they believed in a physical adversary against God. And these beliefs are carried on in the Christianity with the Armageddon day, or even the belief that God basically allows Satan to do what he wants, but he’s going to conquer over him. That was an Essene belief. They believed that Belial was the adversary against God, a fallen angel, leader of the fallen angels, and God would allow him the sin because he would destroy him in the end. So that was an Essene belief, but not all that belief. Some believed that basically fallen angels chose to rebel against God, so they had free will and that God would overcome them in the end. So that’s different. So we have to look at those beliefs because that makes a big difference in theology as well. And one reason I chose to keep daemon or daimon in the text is because this doesn’t mean Jesus is casting out evil demons, but rather, well, the ghost of the mystic belief of pagan gods were fallen angels. So he’s casting out pagan gods, or he’s just casting out unclean spirits, depending on what the definition of word is, because that daimon or unclean spirit, for instance, isn’t always referenced to a pagan god. It’s just someone who’s died vengeful or angry at God, and is now just a ghost causing haunting. So it depends on how it’s being used. So I kept those words in there. So if the word said unclean spirit, I kept that as unclean spirit. But if it was going into a daimon for a pagan god, basically I’ll keep it as that daimon, so they could choose how they’re going to read it. Because sometimes you’re dealing with two things at once. Sometimes you’re dealing with an unclean spirit, then a pagan god’s being mentioned too. So this archon ruler’s having little other minions subject under him. So we even have an archon ruler being mentioned. So an archon of the daemons, ruler of pagan gods. So other gods had dominions, basically. So they viewed these other gods having their own realms of power, which we also see in the Gnostic text. So I kept all that. I also kept the archon of the synagogue, which is a ruler of the synagogue. So it’s not always a bad thing. Sometimes it’s just political rulers that are mentioned. So an archon of the Gentiles, for instance, is just a ruler of Gentiles, just a politician. I have kept archons in the sense of Yahweh somewhat, I believe, as being the devil. Because in John 8:44, we have Jesus going up to the Pharisees and Sadducees and Herodians who made up the high priesthood. He says, You are of your father, the devil. But if only these Gnostic Jews believed in the devil and their God is Yahweh, who’s he calling devil? And then when the daemons are calling him Son of the most high God, they’re calling him huios, which means son. Huios tou theou tou hypsistou, which is Greek for Son of the most high God. But if you put this in the Hebrew, it’s Son of El Elyon. So this is what the pagan gods are calling him. So the lesser gods. And then he’s also saying that we’re all the children of El Elyon, which is also fascinating. And also the word for son they’re using just means child. It can be male or female. But again, they’re wanting a male audience. So they restricted it, which is a shame. Cyd: How about the word aeon? A E O N. What do you do with that word? You know, in my work with the Tripartite Tractate, it seems to me that most references of aeon in the New Testament translate it as time, a period of time, or the end of the ages, the ages. Whereas I tend to see it always as eternal beings from the ethereal plane. What do you think about that? Bishop Nathan Wilson: I love that. I think that too. I think it’s a mixture of all these things, which is also, I keep, it depends on the context of use. But a lot of times you do see the text that is referring to a higher being, which is beautiful to mention, especially when you’re looking at Gnostic works. But you do see this in the New Testament as well. So you see one text mentioning, for instance, who is this Sophia and this higher power? And that’s how the text can translate too, which is fascinating. So that means who’s this unknown higher power. And then it mentions about the Aeon. And so you see all this sort of stuff being mentioned. Yes, it means an eternal being or an angelic being, but it can also mean eternity or a period of time. So depending on the context of use. So words have power as well. So that’s interesting. So again, how it’s used can make a world of a difference. And it’s interesting when they’re using certain words because there are some times that they could have chosen to use a different word. So when they’ve used a certain word like that, that can change the entire context of meaning. Cyd: Right. Like saying there’s some reference to judgment at the end of the age. And I’m always thinking that it’s judgment from the Aeons when I see that. But I’m not translating from scratch, I’m taking biblical translation, so what do I know? Bishop Nathan Wilson: You’re spot on though. So you’re correct. So it can translate that as well. And we have to realize that we have different versions of Christianity. So that’s certainly appropriate for a first century understanding. Most people are looking at from fourth century. So you’re looking at it from a first century point of view. And so you’re ahead of others in that sort of case, which is beautiful to see. So that’s rare. And I chose to keep that for that reason. So people can have their own conclusions, not having it forced onto them. Cyd: You are very much into the history of things. You’re an historian. I am not at all interested in history per se. I’m always talking about what other people believed in other times. That is not pertinent to our gnosis here and now. So what do you view the purpose of this deep historical knowledge that you have concerning the Jews and the Essenes and whatnot? And is it necessary to go into all of that? Bishop Nathan Wilson: If you want to, I guess, teach from a historical perspective as well as a spiritual one, then yes. But if you want to go for spiritual, you can just go by the heart. There were plenty of spiritual teachers that were illiterate, that could not read, that could not write, and they had a beautiful message. So there’s something more powerful that we can receive within that you won’t obtain from books. But ultimately, you can also have wisdom gained from books. It can be a form of worship or a form of connecting with the divine as well. We have many forms of worship or many forms of experience what’s divine or having that intimate moment with what’s divine to reflect and to deepen our purpose. I wanted to know the historical man we call Jesus and ultimately put into practice what he put into practice. So I wanted to look at the history side of things and especially also, what’s another word I would like to use, decondition myself, decondition past beliefs that were harmful, that did not serve me and ultimately not serving others, and also find out that I was wrong about many things, which I wanted to know as well. So what brought me to this was to know the man we call Jesus, Yeshua, or Yehoshua, whichever term you like, whichever name you want to use. So I want to know not just that, but I want to know his practices, what he did with his life, how his first followers lived, how the first Christians lived, and what I could use for my own spiritual path and how I could put that into practice. So that’s why I want to look at the history side of things. I think if you want to put into practice the different techniques of all the many different Gnostics, then you’re going to have to look at some of the history side of things to find those practices. That doesn’t mean that every single practice is necessary for you. So what works for me might not work for others. What works for others might not work for me. So double-edged sword. Cyd: What sort of practices are you referring to? Are these rituals? What’s the practices? Bishop Nathan Wilson: I go into some of the ancient rituals as well. Some of them I might look at the prayers that they would use, the diet they would take, or means of worship. So how they would go about their forms of private practice. So that sort of stuff. And then I might apply it into my own life and see how I can go. There’s still more I’d like to go and check out more. So I’m still studying a couple of some of the ancient practices as well. So from different or religious perspectives as well. And then I can see how I can put it to my own form of use. So I looked at a lot of Jewish Christians, they would do the shema for instance, before their meditations. And I’ll do that as well. [“Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one… You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength…”] They also did breath works back then, which would also induce a sense of intoxication if you want to use, or light headness. And in turn that can also open a new state of reality. So entering the spiritual realm can be a vehicle, if you will, to get there. So to open the mind. And that’s also a practice that’s been used in ancient past. And we can certainly use that today. We have modern practices, say like Wim Hof, that teach breath work in meditation. That’s also useful. So sometimes looking at the past, we do see stuff in today’s world that’s not really new. It’s just being basically reentering this world again, from past knowledge gained of old. And I find that in a lot of Gnostic stuff. When you look at history, you kind of see that Gnostics kind of did a lot of things first, that what we’re doing now that we think is modern, but it’s not. It’s ancient. Cyd: That’s why conventional Christians who read my books, they say, oh, you’re just all new age. And I’m like, no, it’s not new age at all. It’s ancient. Bishop Nathan Wilson: Which is a shame that Christians have been shut off into their own world, which is kind of funny. I actually tell most Christians that they are, in fact, new age, because these beliefs are ancient. And what they are going by is, depending on what version of Christianity, if you’re Protestant, that’s 16th century, I believe. Non-denominal, 18th century. Protestant, 16th century. Catholicism, late second century. Orthodoxy, as we know it now, would be about 14th century. But older Orthodoxy, which would be the split from the Catholic church, is fourth century. So it’s when you go to Gnostic Christians, first century, and we’re really the only groups that are surviving, the Jewish Christians got killed. They ultimately were wiped out or would convert to mainstream Judaism or would become Christian or Islam, they would follow as well. So some would be converted to Muslims, which is also interesting as well. We as Gnostics were also harmed by these other groups, by Catholics, Protestants, Muslims as well. At one point Zoroastrians, but that was only one particular era. And we’ve basically arisen from all that, from that underground, and we’ve still survived, which is fascinating. It’s beautiful that we have. And also the texts that have been rediscovered, this is not accidental. This is all happening for a reason. What’s divine is experiencing itself where it can experience itself and express itself again safely in today’s world. In ancient past, it was dangerous to have diversion after the fourth century, which is a shame because the Catholics would kill those who came before them. They didn’t like that. And they even knew that some of the Gnostics, they had older writings, but they still denied them, which is funny. So it’s why such the hate, which is such a shame. So it goes back to that control of power, my way or the highway, basically. And it was never meant to be like that. It was meant to be very universal. It was meant to be very diverse. The first Christians were Gnostics and Jewish Christians, a mixture between strict law observing Jews and a mixture of Gentiles. And then you had the Jewish mystics that became the Christian mystics, which is fascinating. That was the original groups. And the original groups would argue amongst each other. The strict law observing Jews wanted circumcision, where the mystics said, no, no circumcision of the hearts, let the Gentiles come. That’s fine. So even when we look at the word, say, ethnos, for instance, in the Gospels, when you see kingdom against kingdom, nation against nation, these are the same things. So what they’re actually talking about is Gentile against Gentile and kingdom against kingdom. So the Jewish people didn’t have a kingdom at this stage. It was a mixture of Judea, Galilee and Samaria. So we’re the Samaritans. So that’s also something to take into account, too. So they didn’t like that. They were looking for a messiah to reunify the Jewish people, restore the Jewish faith and make Israel a kingdom again. And so some of them didn’t like the fact that Jesus wasn’t after this, for instance. So they didn’t like some of these teachings. It was a bit different. But if you look at the mystics, they had a very different interpretations. They did believe in a renewal of the Jewish faith, but a renewal back to El Elyon and a rejection of Yahweh. So that’s very different. So when you look at repentance, for Israel to repent, meaning for all of Israel to return back to El Elyon. And if you look at for the Gentiles conversion, that would be referring to not converting to any religion, but converting to God. So God outside religion. So fascinating. So you see all this in the original text. Cyd: And why do you suppose, this might be an unanswerable question, but why do you suppose conventional modern Christians are so, you know, extremely antagonistic towards Gnostic Christians? Is it fear or what? Bishop Nathan Wilson: Well, they’ve been told you're the enemy, basically. And yes, some of it is fear. Fear as well of the unknown. And also because of the need of an opponent. So they believe that they are doing a good thing. And if they don’t do this, they can be punished. So it’s the case of where a victim becomes an abuser. So most Christians have never even heard about Gnostics. It’s only the real ones who are into spiritual warfare, basically, and really full on extremist dogmatic ones that are familiar with, and apologetics. But they are now feeling like they’re losing the battle because more people were interested in Gnosticism and especially interested in other Jewish groups and the Dead Sea Scrolls, as well as the Nag Hammadi. So they’re realizing their other texts and there’s other options now. And that’s great. And regarding even my translations, one reason I chose to do it that I did, I found out that no modern English Bible translates from one source material. They’re all a mixture of different sources. So we have the Codex Sinaiticus mixed with the Latin Vulgate, mixing with Germanic copies, and then mixing ancient Koine Greek into modern Hebrew, putting it back into Greek. And that’s not good at all. So we’re just changing—we’re swapping chapters because we feel uncomfortable with them. So I was mortified when I was looking at that. And so I realized I couldn’t trust basically my Bible anymore. So I thought, well, I’m making this myself. And then I thought, well, I’m going to release it. Let’s go and share it too and do what they will with it. And it opened a lot of doorways to me, actually. So that’s one reason I wanted to give that out so people can have their own faith in their own interpretation and also believe in the message of Yeshua, bringing people back to the Most High God, to the Unknowable God, the Living Father, the Mother-Father. And we also see the Mother being mentioned in other texts too. It’s just mostly blocked out by mainstream Christianity, which is unfair, unfair to women and unfair to humanity with their approaches. It’s been very violent. So we need to remove that violence because that’s nothing to do with Yeshua’s teachings. He didn’t teach us to go around fighting each other. He said, Those who are for me are with me. They don’t understand his message. They very much follow the Catholic teachings of Paul that they’ve been given. And so they can look at the Gnostic teachings of Paul as well, which are also in there. Paul’s letters, we now know they’re mostly all forgeries. We don’t have any original copies either. They’re all later fourth century and we have some second century fragments. But the oldest reference to Paul is from the Ten Letters of Marcion. And he’s the man who compiled the first Christian Bible. And some people can argue, some people don’t believe he was a Gnostic. Others think he was a Gnostic. I think he was a type of Gnostic because he believed in a demiurge. So he believed that the God of the Jews was Yahweh and not the Supreme God of Jesus. That is a very Gnostic belief. But the thing is, the word Gnostic was given to us by the Catholic church, was a way of separating us and identifying us. But we wear it as a badge of honor because we understand they’re just calling us knowledgeable Christians, which is kind of funny. So language is powerful and the Catholic church certainly forgot it. So because of them, we now use daimon as demon. So they’ve basically demonized Jesus. They’ve demonized the Holy Spirit, which is their greatest sin. And they’ve demonized God and every other God. So they don’t know what damage they’ve done. And that’s not good. So I wanted to reverse that damage and bring people back to what I believe is the message of Yeshua, of Jesus, and to have their own spiritual relationship with God, an individual relationship, which is something that I want to see more of. That’s a very beautiful thing. You can’t define that intimate experience without living it. Cyd: Right, right. Well, that's all we have time for in this episode. We'll pick it up again next week for part three of my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson of The Gnostic Union Church.  I like the way he talks, huh? Until next week, onward and upward and God bless us all.

Welcome back to Gnostic Insights and to the Gnostic Reformation on Substack. Last week was part one of my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson of the Gnostic Union, and he explained to us a bit about who the Gnostic Union is and what they believe in. At the beginning of that episode, I read from the Gnostic Union website their history and mission statement. And my brother Billy called me up and said, “Oh, but there’s a point of their theology that’s all wrong. I know they’re ecumenical and all, but we mustn’t fall into the error of wrong teaching.” And, you know, I totally agree with that concept, not teaching anything that is incorrect or that doesn’t make sense, according to the Gnosticism that I share with you here. And it created a very large discussion between my brother and me. And I don’t even have enough time in this short introduction to go into the point that Bill brought up out of their statement of beliefs. So we’ll wait and we’ll do that when these interviews are all over and that way we can go into depth and give the topic the attention it deserves. You see, the Gnosticism that I share with you here mostly comes from the Tripartite Tractate of the Nag Hammadi. And the Tripartite Tractate is a very unusual book. It is not a book of mythology. It is not a book of ancient myths concerning angels and demigods and great battles in heaven and so forth. It’s not that kind of book. We think of it as physics. It’s literally a book that describes the cosmology and the cosmogony, that is, how consciousness came to be transmitted from the base state of consciousness that we call the Father or the Source, and all the way downstream into, ultimately, us. We’re sitting here talking and thinking about it. This is pure consciousness we’re talking about. It’s not particularities. You understand? Gnosis itself we think of as that river of consciousness. That’s what gnosis is. So, I often say, if my dog can’t understand the gnosis, it’s not really gnosis—it's a knowledge claim. If a blade of grass or a tree in the forest can’t bask in the gnosis, then it’s not really gnosis. It’s a human knowledge claim. This is the reason why here at Gnostic Insights and on the Gnostic Reformation, we do not dwell in the history of things. We dwell in the understanding or the gnosis itself. The cosmogony and cosmology of Gnosticism that I share with you here is a logical step-by-step rollout of the consciousness of the Father or the Source. It doesn’t really matter what you call it. It’s the base state. It’s the matrix of consciousness itself and how it flows down to us. There are necessary steps described in the Tripartite Tractate for how that consciousness is differentiated and particularized and then rolled down. And how it is that we material beings are different than the ethereal beings. How could that have possibly happened? It’s like that. It’s a logical progression that necessarily comes out of an a priori statement of consciousness as the ground state. That’s quite a bit different than mythologies of how these angels fit in with these gods and goddesses down here on earth and so forth. Because those particularities definitely come out of the mind of humans. They can be inspired. Okay, I’ll give you that. But they are knowledge claims. They’re not necessarily gnosis and because of that they can go wrong. They can be wrong. Whereas starting with this a priori notion of consciousness ending up in us and how does that occur? By what means does that possibly happen? And how is it that we earthlings plug into that illimitable consciousness? That’s a different thing. That’s a description of process. That’s an understanding or a gnosis of what it is that we are part of. 15 steps in Gnostic Cosmology So I’m not knocking the history or the particularities that Bishop Wilson shares with us. But the gnosis that leads you to enlightenment is simply this: We come from the Father [El Elyon] or from the Source or from the Mother-Father or from the Great Mother—whatever you want to call it. We come from that Source, that unlimited well of consciousness and life and power and might and love. And then we will return to that. That’s all you have to know. We come from Above and we return to Above. And with that knowledge, that’s your base state. That’s what the blades of grass and the dogs and the trees all understand. All the rest of the particularities of who and why and how, those are just details being filled in. Some of them out of gnosis, but most of them out of tradition or history. So we’ll be proceeding now into part two of my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson of the Gnostic Union. And later on, we’re going to talk some more about the difference between mythology and the process of gnosis. That is what this podcast specializes in. That’s what my brother Bill and I have parsed out and discovered out of direct mining of the Tripartite Tractate. Our gnosis comes from that and it proceeds in an orderly fashion that doesn’t require any extra research. It’s all about gnosis and what must be. But here, let’s go back to this interview with Brother Wilson. **************************************************************** Cyd: Well, tell me more about your Bible that you wrote. What do you call it? You call it… Bishop Nathan Wilson: I call it The Gnostic Christian Truth Bible. I actually asked one of the older bishops that trained me, Bishop Jason, and he started that. So, I like the name. So, I thought, okay, I want to put Gnostic Christian in there. So, I was going to call it first the Truth Bible. He requested that, but I thought, well, Gnostic Christian makes it less likely for the Catholics to come after me as well, and the Protestants. Many do not like my translations. They are quite upset that I’ve done this, but they don’t put too much light on me. So, it’s best not to give me too much attention, basically. So, the less attention I have, the less people know about this, but which is something unique about mine. I don’t just offer my translations. I offer the original Koine Greek with it, so they can look at the actual text. So, even if my translation, say, could be wrong, they could look straight at that text and go argue with the text that they see, which I also wanted to include for their own reason, and when I included the alternative English, it’s so I might read it one way, but someone else is going to read it another way, and that can teach me something new. I feel, oh, I didn’t understand it like that. So, that’s why I wanted to keep that in there too, and a couple of words I kept in there were Greek. So, I kept Logos. I kept Kosmos, Zoe, Sophia, Archon. Magus. I kept all these words. So, very, very Gnostic, and you won’t find these in the English translations. They have gone out of their ways to censor them. I also kept the word daemon or daimon, daemon, so I did not put that down as demon because that’s not what it means. So, I kept the original Greek context of use, and I also add a Greek, Koine Greek, index in my translation so people can actually look at little snippets of what these words mean. So, I have some things in here. So, this is just on one page on basically all Greek with English meaning. So, there’s Logos, which I explained means God’s word, God’s authority, God’s reasoning, song, and speech, and utterance. So, when you see Christians speak that Jesus is speaking the Word, or in the beginning there was Word, they are doing a disservice to what’s being implied. This is the word of God. Very different, and even the word God we use is very English. I did keep up, but for the English sake of things. So, English people wouldn’t freak out too much on me, and another thing is also a safer mouthful, because this Word means supreme deity, deity of deities, which is very interesting. Otherwise, we would go into a god, which is lesser gods as well. So, we have a pantheon. So, it was very different, like even monotheism would evolve into what we think it is today, but in the ancient past with ancient Jewish people, they did believe in other gods, it’s just they chose to worship one god. So, this would be not the same as monotheism now, where you completely reject them as non-existent. This wasn’t that case. So, they had a very different mind. So I kept Sophia being wisdom. I mentioned this is how this is feminine wisdom, God’s feminine wisdom, coming from the Hebrew word Chokmah. Sometimes those are called Chokmah. So, I kept that in there as Sophia. Zoe, I kept too, meaning basically when you see eternal Zoe, that’s eternal life. So, that’s implying the feminine wisdom again, but also the spiritual benefits one receives with a spiritual relationship with God, or what’s with mine. So, I kept that in there. So, it’s very feminine, and that’s being removed. They would not want you to know that life is Zoe, and there’s other words they could have used for life or soul, but they chose to use the word Zoe, and that’s important. So, I kept that in there. And I’ve also got Megas. I’ve already mentioned that, but Magus comes from—here’s two words that are entwined, but the thing was the church has used a later translation, which would be terrible, but that’s kind of wrong, and this is because the language would evolve over time. It came to words Megus and Magos, which basically would be Magi, and then great and powerful, larger than life. So, Jesus was also called Iesous Magos. So, Jesus the Great, Jesus the Wise, has been censored because of Magus, and they don’t want you to know about Simon Magus. They don’t want you to know anything about Gnosticism. So, this has been censored, and I’ve also put some passages where find this. I kept Daemon in here, or Diamon. Gehenna, I also translated in here. I kept Gehenna. I did not use hell because hell is German. It’s realm of light in German, so it’s a Germanic word. So, I kept the word Gehenna, which is ultimately what we would kind of call hell, but it’s not what people think it is. That’s an evolved tradition. So, Gehenna or even Abaddon, these are two different words, but the same thing. Gehenna was the place where the soul was destroyed or purified. So, the text can translate to eternal punishment, but that’s not strictly bound to it. That’s more would be a later theology bound to that translation where it means period of time. So, it doesn’t necessarily mean all these different things. It’s like the word soma where it’s all about Jesus’ body. It can be living body, dead body, or a carcass, or even the living body of the church, which is more symbolic, but fascinating. I also kept in here a couple words, such as I explained Hades, which is mentioned with Sheol and how that’s separate from Gehenna. I’ve kept Helios, Selene, Astron, or Asterios, as well as Aletheia. These words are very interesting because they are all gods. They’re all Greco-Roman gods. So, the scholars or, I really should say, a Christian apologist, that state there’s no pagan gods in the New Testament—they are entirely wrong. It’s just that they have looked at it in a modern Greek eye instead of looking at an ancient past—they would have seen the gods being mentioned. So that’s very interesting. So when Jesus says that the stars and the sun is falling, he’s not speaking about the sun and stars. He’s speaking about the Helios, the Roman sun god is falling, and the stars and goddesses falling, as well as Selene, the moon, so the moon goddess. That’s the falling of the pagan Roman gods that was subjecting the Jewish people. So very different theology. So theology matters. So we have to look at how people believed back these times. [Jesus speaks of the stars, moon, and sun in Matthew 24:29, Mark 13:25, Luke 21:25. Assigning them as gods and goddesses is Bishop Wilson's interpretation.] The Jewish people did not like the Romans. Not saying that all of them did not. We had some that were pro-Roman. One of the Romans that was involved in the Jewish revolt, fighting against the Jewish people, was Jewish, which is cool. And he was related to Philo of Alexandria. So very interesting. I think he might be his grandson. Cyd: Let me jump in for a second as we’re speaking about gods and the God Above All Gods versus lesser gods. Is it your thought that the God of the Jews of the Old Testament, Jehovah, is a lesser god as opposed to the God Above All Gods? Bishop Nathan Wilson: Yes. Cyd: Okay, so Jehovah is the tribal god of the Old Testament? Bishop Nathan Wilson: Yes, a bit of a mix. So there’s two gods. Well, there’s a couple, if you’ve got to go every single god being mentioned. But what they’re describing is, say, Deuteronomy 32:8, you have El Elyon dividing up the nations according to the Elohim being children of El, and Yahweh received his inheritance from the most high God. So Yahweh was more like a guardian deity, basically. He was a brother of Baal. But some Canaanites believed that Yahweh was Baal. So Yahweh kind of came later after Baal. But the first to worship Yahweh were the Sashu of Yahweh. So they were Canaanite raiders. Hebrew was also a Canaanite language.  [The earliest trace of Yahweh isn't Israelite—it's desert-born. Egyptian inscriptions speak of the “Shasu of YHW,” nomadic peoples on the edges of Canaan, sometimes regarded as raiders. It suggests the name of Yahweh may have emerged out of the wilderness before it was ever claimed by Israel. Even Hebrew itself comes out of the same Canaanite linguistic world.] So I see the views—the ones that were worshipping El would be the ones that would become the Essenes or Jewish mystics. So the Essenes worshipped El. They didn’t worship Yahweh. They viewed Yahweh as a lesser god, which is one reason they challenged the temple, because they viewed, you guys aren’t worshipping God, you’re worshipping the lesser deity, you’re worshipping an angel. And so they rejected the temple. And the priesthood was corrupt. So then you also had the Magharians or Magarites. They were first century BC era Jews. They were proto-Gnostic, so that’s a scholar term. So they were Jewish mystics. They believed that Yahweh was a demiurge and that he was a lieutenant. So not an evil demiurge, but he was ignorant of the most high Father El Elyon, but that’s not a name to them. That was just a title meaning most high God. So they didn’t believe in God with a name, the unknowable Father, they believed was beyond sex as well. So Mother-Father, basically. So beyond all things. Too perfect to interfere with matter. And they believed that the Torah had been corrupted. So that’s fascinating. So that’s a group that we want to talk about. So we had about 25 different versions of Judaism during that time with all different beliefs. So what type of Jew was Jesus? This makes a big, big difference. So not all Jews worshipped Yahweh. Some viewed him as a lesser God and some viewed him as the devil, which is whack. So the only Gnostics or proto-Gnostics would use that word devil at that time. So we have the wisdom of Solomon, which is the first text adored by Christians that they would say, look, this is our Messiah mentioning he’s a dying and rising Messiah calling himself the Son of God and he’s been crucified. So this means that just like our text, he would die a shameful death. But this text mentions that through death, the devil enters the world. So the Pharisees didn’t believe in the devil. The Sadducees didn’t either. But what’s interesting about the Pharisees and Sadducees and the Herodians, which kind of made up both these groups, they were a part of both, just the Herodians mostly supported King Herod. They believed that either King Herod was the Messiah or his family would be, or they belonged to the Sadducees and didn’t believe in a Messiah. So the Sadducees didn’t believe in angels. They didn’t believe in an afterlife. They believed once you were dead, the soul turned to dust. God was too perfect to interfere with humans. So that’s an interesting belief. But we had different subsects of Sadducees that had a different opinion to that. They believed that God did interfere with humans, but we had total free will. So they could interfere with some things, but there was no Messiah. There was no angels. So they believed that a human could be a messenger of God. That was about it. So like Moses. Then you had the Pharisees. They believed that Satan served Yahweh. His job was to test humanity or seduce humanity away from God. So that way mankind had free will. But some Pharisees didn’t believe that. They believed that Satan, Hasatan, was just symbolic for mankind’s inclination towards evil. So they didn’t believe in an evil being. So their belief was that God ordained good and evil, basically, would use evil for his own will. So that’s trippy, very trippy. So the Pharisees had a very different belief. They didn’t believe in the adversary against God. They didn’t believe in fallen angels. Later on, they would take on this belief, borrowing it from mystics and zealots. So funny enough, they would be influenced by Jesus’ teachings, such as saving a life on the Sabbath. The Pharisees would not do that. But to be fair, some Essenes wouldn’t do that either. Some Essenes were very warlike, wanting to join God’s angelic army fighting at the Armageddon of the last days of the world. But these mystics, they are the only groups that believed in fallen angels and believed in a place of punishment. The only groups. And that’s fascinating. So they believed in a physical adversary against God. And these beliefs are carried on in the Christianity with the Armageddon day, or even the belief that God basically allows Satan to do what he wants, but he’s going to conquer over him. That was an Essene belief. They believed that Belial was the adversary against God, a fallen angel, leader of the fallen angels, and God would allow him the sin because he would destroy him in the end. So that was an Essene belief, but not all that belief. Some believed that basically fallen angels chose to rebel against God, so they had free will and that God would overcome them in the end. So that’s different. So we have to look at those beliefs because that makes a big difference in theology as well. And one reason I chose to keep daemon or daimon in the text is because this doesn’t mean Jesus is casting out evil demons, but rather, well, the ghost of the mystic belief of pagan gods were fallen angels. So he’s casting out pagan gods, or he’s just casting out unclean spirits, depending on what the definition of word is, because that daimon or unclean spirit, for instance, isn’t always referenced to a pagan god. It’s just someone who’s died vengeful or angry at God, and is now just a ghost causing haunting. So it depends on how it’s being used. So I kept those words in there. So if the word said unclean spirit, I kept that as unclean spirit. But if it was going into a daimon for a pagan god, basically I’ll keep it as that daimon, so they could choose how they’re going to read it. Because sometimes you’re dealing with two things at once. Sometimes you’re dealing with an unclean spirit, then a pagan god’s being mentioned too. So this archon ruler’s having little other minions subject under him. So we even have an archon ruler being mentioned. So an archon of the daemons, ruler of pagan gods. So other gods had dominions, basically. So they viewed these other gods having their own realms of power, which we also see in the Gnostic text. So I kept all that. I also kept the archon of the synagogue, which is a ruler of the synagogue. So it’s not always a bad thing. Sometimes it’s just political rulers that are mentioned. So an archon of the Gentiles, for instance, is just a ruler of Gentiles, just a politician. I have kept archons in the sense of Yahweh somewhat, I believe, as being the devil. Because in John 8:44, we have Jesus going up to the Pharisees and Sadducees and Herodians who made up the high priesthood. He says, You are of your father, the devil. But if only these Gnostic Jews believed in the devil and their God is Yahweh, who’s he calling devil? And then when the daemons are calling him Son of the most high God, they’re calling him huios, which means son. Huios tou theou tou hypsistou, which is Greek for Son of the most high God. But if you put this in the Hebrew, it’s Son of El Elyon. So this is what the pagan gods are calling him. So the lesser gods. And then he’s also saying that we’re all the children of El Elyon, which is also fascinating. And also the word for son they’re using just means child. It can be male or female. But again, they’re wanting a male audience. So they restricted it, which is a shame. Cyd: How about the word aeon? A E O N. What do you do with that word? You know, in my work with the Tripartite Tractate, it seems to me that most references of aeon in the New Testament translate it as time, a period of time, or the end of the ages, the ages. Whereas I tend to see it always as eternal beings from the ethereal plane. What do you think about that? Bishop Nathan Wilson: I love that. I think that too. I think it’s a mixture of all these things, which is also, I keep, it depends on the context of use. But a lot of times you do see the text that is referring to a higher being, which is beautiful to mention, especially when you’re looking at Gnostic works. But you do see this in the New Testament as well. So you see one text mentioning, for instance, who is this Sophia and this higher power? And that’s how the text can translate too, which is fascinating. So that means who’s this unknown higher power. And then it mentions about the Aeon. And so you see all this sort of stuff being mentioned. Yes, it means an eternal being or an angelic being, but it can also mean eternity or a period of time. So depending on the context of use. So words have power as well. So that’s interesting. So again, how it’s used can make a world of a difference. And it’s interesting when they’re using certain words because there are some times that they could have chosen to use a different word. So when they’ve used a certain word like that, that can change the entire context of meaning. Cyd: Right. Like saying there’s some reference to judgment at the end of the age. And I’m always thinking that it’s judgment from the Aeons when I see that. But I’m not translating from scratch, I’m taking biblical translation, so what do I know? Bishop Nathan Wilson: You’re spot on though. So you’re correct. So it can translate that as well. And we have to realize that we have different versions of Christianity. So that’s certainly appropriate for a first century understanding. Most people are looking at from fourth century. So you’re looking at it from a first century point of view. And so you’re ahead of others in that sort of case, which is beautiful to see. So that’s rare. And I chose to keep that for that reason. So people can have their own conclusions, not having it forced onto them. Cyd: You are very much into the history of things. You’re an historian. I am not at all interested in history per se. I’m always talking about what other people believed in other times. That is not pertinent to our gnosis here and now. So what do you view the purpose of this deep historical knowledge that you have concerning the Jews and the Essenes and whatnot? And is it necessary to go into all of that? Bishop Nathan Wilson: If you want to, I guess, teach from a historical perspective as well as a spiritual one, then yes. But if you want to go for spiritual, you can just go by the heart. There were plenty of spiritual teachers that were illiterate, that could not read, that could not write, and they had a beautiful message. So there’s something more powerful that we can receive within that you won’t obtain from books. But ultimately, you can also have wisdom gained from books. It can be a form of worship or a form of connecting with the divine as well. We have many forms of worship or many forms of experience what’s divine or having that intimate moment with what’s divine to reflect and to deepen our purpose. I wanted to know the historical man we call Jesus and ultimately put into practice what he put into practice. So I wanted to look at the history side of things and especially also, what’s another word I would like to use, decondition myself, decondition past beliefs that were harmful, that did not serve me and ultimately not serving others, and also find out that I was wrong about many things, which I wanted to know as well. So what brought me to this was to know the man we call Jesus, Yeshua, or Yehoshua, whichever term you like, whichever name you want to use. So I want to know not just that, but I want to know his practices, what he did with his life, how his first followers lived, how the first Christians lived, and what I could use for my own spiritual path and how I could put that into practice. So that’s why I want to look at the history side of things. I think if you want to put into practice the different techniques of all the many different Gnostics, then you’re going to have to look at some of the history side of things to find those practices. That doesn’t mean that every single practice is necessary for you. So what works for me might not work for others. What works for others might not work for me. So double-edged sword. Cyd: What sort of practices are you referring to? Are these rituals? What’s the practices? Bishop Nathan Wilson: I go into some of the ancient rituals as well. Some of them I might look at the prayers that they would use, the diet they would take, or means of worship. So how they would go about their forms of private practice. So that sort of stuff. And then I might apply it into my own life and see how I can go. There’s still more I’d like to go and check out more. So I’m still studying a couple of some of the ancient practices as well. So from different or religious perspectives as well. And then I can see how I can put it to my own form of use. So I looked at a lot of Jewish Christians, they would do the shema for instance, before their meditations. And I’ll do that as well. [“Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one… You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength…”] They also did breath works back then, which would also induce a sense of intoxication if you want to use, or light headness. And in turn that can also open a new state of reality. So entering the spiritual realm can be a vehicle, if you will, to get there. So to open the mind. And that’s also a practice that’s been used in ancient past. And we can certainly use that today. We have modern practices, say like Wim Hof, that teach breath work in meditation. That’s also useful. So sometimes looking at the past, we do see stuff in today’s world that’s not really new. It’s just being basically reentering this world again, from past knowledge gained of old. And I find that in a lot of Gnostic stuff. When you look at history, you kind of see that Gnostics kind of did a lot of things first, that what we’re doing now that we think is modern, but it’s not. It’s ancient. Cyd: That’s why conventional Christians who read my books, they say, oh, you’re just all new age. And I’m like, no, it’s not new age at all. It’s ancient. Bishop Nathan Wilson: Which is a shame that Christians have been shut off into their own world, which is kind of funny. I actually tell most Christians that they are, in fact, new age, because these beliefs are ancient. And what they are going by is, depending on what version of Christianity, if you’re Protestant, that’s 16th century, I believe. Non-denominal, 18th century. Protestant, 16th century. Catholicism, late second century. Orthodoxy, as we know it now, would be about 14th century. But older Orthodoxy, which would be the split from the Catholic church, is fourth century. So it’s when you go to Gnostic Christians, first century, and we’re really the only groups that are surviving, the Jewish Christians got killed. They ultimately were wiped out or would convert to mainstream Judaism or would become Christian or Islam, they would follow as well. So some would be converted to Muslims, which is also interesting as well. We as Gnostics were also harmed by these other groups, by Catholics, Protestants, Muslims as well. At one point Zoroastrians, but that was only one particular era. And we’ve basically arisen from all that, from that underground, and we’ve still survived, which is fascinating. It’s beautiful that we have. And also the texts that have been rediscovered, this is not accidental. This is all happening for a reason. What’s divine is experiencing itself where it can experience itself and express itself again safely in today’s world. In ancient past, it was dangerous to have diversion after the fourth century, which is a shame because the Catholics would kill those who came before them. They didn’t like that. And they even knew that some of the Gnostics, they had older writings, but they still denied them, which is funny. So it’s why such the hate, which is such a shame. So it goes back to that control of power, my way or the highway, basically. And it was never meant to be like that. It was meant to be very universal. It was meant to be very diverse. The first Christians were Gnostics and Jewish Christians, a mixture between strict law observing Jews and a mixture of Gentiles. And then you had the Jewish mystics that became the Christian mystics, which is fascinating. That was the original groups. And the original groups would argue amongst each other. The strict law observing Jews wanted circumcision, where the mystics said, no, no circumcision of the hearts, let the Gentiles come. That’s fine. So even when we look at the word, say, ethnos, for instance, in the Gospels, when you see kingdom against kingdom, nation against nation, these are the same things. So what they’re actually talking about is Gentile against Gentile and kingdom against kingdom. So the Jewish people didn’t have a kingdom at this stage. It was a mixture of Judea, Galilee and Samaria. So we’re the Samaritans. So that’s also something to take into account, too. So they didn’t like that. They were looking for a messiah to reunify the Jewish people, restore the Jewish faith and make Israel a kingdom again. And so some of them didn’t like the fact that Jesus wasn’t after this, for instance. So they didn’t like some of these teachings. It was a bit different. But if you look at the mystics, they had a very different interpretations. They did believe in a renewal of the Jewish faith, but a renewal back to El Elyon and a rejection of Yahweh. So that’s very different. So when you look at repentance, for Israel to repent, meaning for all of Israel to return back to El Elyon. And if you look at for the Gentiles conversion, that would be referring to not converting to any religion, but converting to God. So God outside religion. So fascinating. So you see all this in the original text. Cyd: And why do you suppose, this might be an unanswerable question, but why do you suppose conventional modern Christians are so, you know, extremely antagonistic towards Gnostic Christians? Is it fear or what? Bishop Nathan Wilson: Well, they’ve been told you're the enemy, basically. And yes, some of it is fear. Fear as well of the unknown. And also because of the need of an opponent. So they believe that they are doing a good thing. And if they don’t do this, they can be punished. So it’s the case of where a victim becomes an abuser. So most Christians have never even heard about Gnostics. It’s only the real ones who are into spiritual warfare, basically, and really full on extremist dogmatic ones that are familiar with, and apologetics. But they are now feeling like they’re losing the battle because more people were interested in Gnosticism and especially interested in other Jewish groups and the Dead Sea Scrolls, as well as the Nag Hammadi. So they’re realizing their other texts and there’s other options now. And that’s great. And regarding even my translations, one reason I chose to do it that I did, I found out that no modern English Bible translates from one source material. They’re all a mixture of different sources. So we have the Codex Sinaiticus mixed with the Latin Vulgate, mixing with Germanic copies, and then mixing ancient Koine Greek into modern Hebrew, putting it back into Greek. And that’s not good at all. So we’re just changing—we’re swapping chapters because we feel uncomfortable with them. So I was mortified when I was looking at that. And so I realized I couldn’t trust basically my Bible anymore. So I thought, well, I’m making this myself. And then I thought, well, I’m going to release it. Let’s go and share it too and do what they will with it. And it opened a lot of doorways to me, actually. So that’s one reason I wanted to give that out so people can have their own faith in their own interpretation and also believe in the message of Yeshua, bringing people back to the Most High God, to the Unknowable God, the Living Father, the Mother-Father. And we also see the Mother being mentioned in other texts too. It’s just mostly blocked out by mainstream Christianity, which is unfair, unfair to women and unfair to humanity with their approaches. It’s been very violent. So we need to remove that violence because that’s nothing to do with Yeshua’s teachings. He didn’t teach us to go around fighting each other. He said, Those who are for me are with me. They don’t understand his message. They very much follow the Catholic teachings of Paul that they’ve been given. And so they can look at the Gnostic teachings of Paul as well, which are also in there. Paul’s letters, we now know they’re mostly all forgeries. We don’t have any original copies either. They’re all later fourth century and we have some second century fragments. But the oldest reference to Paul is from the Ten Letters of Marcion. And he’s the man who compiled the first Christian Bible. And some people can argue, some people don’t believe he was a Gnostic. Others think he was a Gnostic. I think he was a type of Gnostic because he believed in a demiurge. So he believed that the God of the Jews was Yahweh and not the Supreme God of Jesus. That is a very Gnostic belief. But the thing is, the word Gnostic was given to us by the Catholic church, was a way of separating us and identifying us. But we wear it as a badge of honor because we understand they’re just calling us knowledgeable Christians, which is kind of funny. So language is powerful and the Catholic church certainly forgot it. So because of them, we now use daimon as demon. So they’ve basically demonized Jesus. They’ve demonized the Holy Spirit, which is their greatest sin. And they’ve demonized God and every other God. So they don’t know what damage they’ve done. And that’s not good. So I wanted to reverse that damage and bring people back to what I believe is the message of Yeshua, of Jesus, and to have their own spiritual relationship with God, an individual relationship, which is something that I want to see more of. That’s a very beautiful thing. You can’t define that intimate experience without living it. Cyd: Right, right. Well, that's all we have time for in this episode. We'll pick it up again next week for part three of my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson of The Gnostic Union Church.  I like the way he talks, huh? Until next week, onward and upward and God bless us all.

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! 1995 - Ío, el lugar más violento del sistema solar: Observación Astronómica y Exploración Espacial 441-M-ARAW Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Programa en directo desde el Palacio de Congresos Calatrava en Oviedo Con: J.J. Benítez Josep Guijarro Jose Antonio Caravaca Pablo Tresgallo Paco Luzón: Astrofotógrafo Marcos Suarez: Astrofísico Presidente de la Asociación Astronómica de Oviedo Marcelino Requejo David Madrazo

Lectores de Viajes National Geographic de España eligen Chequia | Remodelan cuatro tallas del Reloj astronómico | Mauricio Wiesenthal y su viaje europeo en la Feria del Libro de Praga

¡¡NUEVO PODCAST!!-Cuauhtli Arau.  Psicoterapeuta experto en Desarrollo Humano… “Los lentes que todos usamos”  -Maestra Luz Calderón… “Eventos astronómicos de Mayo”  -Iconic Beauty Experts… Fernanda Rangel y  Ivonne Martínez… “Las novias de mayo”  

Hace unos días el jefe de la NASA, Jared Isaacman, dijo estar completamente a favor de restaurar el estatus de planeta a Plutón que fue eliminado del listado de planetas que orbitan alrededor del sol en 2006. El debate entre los astrónomos está servido. Javier Sampedro y Pere Estupinyà comentan este y otros temas científicos de actualidad. 

Hace 20 años, la Unión Astronómica Internacional decidió eliminar a Plutón de su lista de planetas principales del Sistema Solar y clasificarlo como planeta enano. Una decisión que fue vista por aficionados a la astronomía y por parte de la comunidad científica con una mezcla de nostalgia y desencanto. Dos décadas después, el administrador de la NASA, Jared Isaacman, ha asegurado que la agencia planea reabrir el debate sobre el regreso del que fue el noveno planeta. En "Más cerca" (Radio 5) hemos entrevistado a Emilio Alfaro, fundador del Dpto. de Radioastronomía y Estructura Galáctica del Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC). Escuchar audio

Prepárate para un viaje fuera de este mundo en este episodio de Café en Mano! Hoy nos sentamos con Isaac Gómez, creador de "Notas Astronómicas", para hablar de la inmensidad del universo, la física de nuestra vida cotidiana y el esperado regreso del ser humano a la Luna.Analizamos a fondo la Misión Artemis de la NASA: ¿por qué ha tomado tanto tiempo volver? ¿Qué es lo que realmente falta por lograr y cuáles son los retos más grandes que enfrentan los astronautas hoy en día? Isaac también nos explica fenómenos increíbles del espacio, aborda el debate sobre las misiones lunares pasadas y nos hace ver las estrellas de una manera completamente distinta. ¡Un episodio que te va a volar la cabeza!☕ Este episodio es traído a ustedes por Fus Telecom, internet sin preocupaciones.

Esto se pregunta un chiflado que sostiene que su hijo absorbe toda la materia de la casa. Empezó cuando unos monjes budistas se lo llevaron.

Esto se pregunta un chiflado que sostiene que su hijo absorbe toda la materia de la casa. Empezó cuando unos monjes budistas se lo llevaron.

Esto se pregunta un chiflado que sostiene que su hijo absorbe toda la materia de la casa. Empezó cuando unos monjes budistas se lo llevaron.

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! 1936 - Astronáutica y Exploración Espacial: Habitats Espaciales "La Tierra es la cuna de la humanidad, pero no se puede vivir en la cuna para siempre" 1911, Konstantín Tsiolkovski, Padre de la Cosmonáutica rusa. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

1933 - Astronáutica y Exploración Espacial: La Saga Artemis II: La Cuenta Atrás para el despertar del gigante SLS. El blindaje operativo previo al lanzamiento https://www.linkedin.com/posts/francisco-contreras-garc%C3%ADa-74175128_universodemisterios-elultimohumanista-artemisii-ugcPost-7450981081723564032-unXS?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAXOM-EBIUkWG4Q1DlzF-_NmIq2utPBaQHM Si va a escribir un comentario, gracias por hacerlo, pero por favor, lea antes las normas de publicación que se encuentran a continuación: (si usted es una persona educada, no tiene que leer las normas). Universo de Misterios tiene reservado el derecho de admisión y publicación de comentarios. Los comentarios son aprobados o rechazados por el departamento de comunicaciones y gestión de comentarios y correos electrónicos de UDM. José Rafael solo lee los comentarios una vez hayan sido publicados. El muro de comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social. No espere que el creador del podcast “debata” con usted. Generalmente, los comentarios anónimos podrían no ser publicados. UDM es un podcast independiente y, por tanto, su contenido expresa el criterio de su autor. La temática general es la Ciencia y el Misterio bien entendido, pero su autor podrá abordar otras temáticas. No está obligado a escuchar UDM, si no le gusta lo que escucha, puede dejar de hacerlo, pero no le diga al autor de lo que debe o no debe hablar en su podcast. No envíe comentarios que contengan falacias lógicas. No de información personal. No espere que su comentario sea respondido necesariamente. Comprenda que se reciben diariamente un elevado número de comentarios que han de ser gestionados, se publiquen o no. Si hace comentarios con afirmaciones dudosas, arguméntelas aportando enlaces a fuentes fiables (recuerde, el muro de Comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social). En caso de no respaldar su comentario como se indica en la caja de descripción del episodio, su comentario podrá no ser publicado. Siguiendo las recomendaciones de la NASA publicadas en el Informe sobre UAP del 13 de septiembre de 2023, en UDM no aprobamos comentarios que contribuyan a extender el estigma que tradicionalmente ha caído sobre los testigos de UAP/OVNIs. Contacto con Universo de Misterios: universodemisteriospodcast@gmail.com En la realización de los episodios de Universo de Misterios puede recurrirse a la ayuda de Inteligencia Artificial como herramienta. Puedes hacerte Fan de Universo de Misterios y apoyarlo económicamente obteniendo acceso a todos los episodios cerrados, sin publicidad, desde 1,99 €. Aunque a algunas personas, a veces, puede proporcionar una falsa sensación de alivio, la ignorancia nunca es deseable. Pero eso, tú ya lo sabes... Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! ntbyd - 1917 - Astronáutica: Luciérnagas en el Vacío, el misterio de la Friendship 7 Si va a escribir un comentario, gracias por hacerlo, pero por favor, lea antes las normas de publicación que se encuentran a continuación: (si usted es una persona educada, no tiene que leer las normas). Universo de Misterios tiene reservado el derecho de admisión y publicación de comentarios. Los comentarios son aprobados o rechazados por el departamento de comunicaciones y gestión de comentarios y correos electrónicos de UDM. José Rafael solo lee los comentarios una vez hayan sido publicados. El muro de comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social. No espere que el creador del podcast “debata” con usted. Generalmente, los comentarios anónimos podrían no ser publicados. UDM es un podcast independiente y, por tanto, su contenido expresa el criterio de su autor. La temática general es la Ciencia y el Misterio bien entendido, pero su autor podrá abordar otras temáticas. No está obligado a escuchar UDM, si no le gusta lo que escucha, puede dejar de hacerlo, pero no le diga al autor de lo que debe o no debe hablar en su podcast. No envíe comentarios que contengan falacias lógicas. No de información personal. No espere que su comentario sea respondido necesariamente. Comprenda que se reciben diariamente un elevado número de comentarios que han de ser gestionados, se publiquen o no. Si hace comentarios con afirmaciones dudosas, arguméntelas aportando enlaces a fuentes fiables (recuerde, el muro de Comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social). En caso de no respaldar su comentario como se indica en la caja de descripción del episodio, su comentario podrá no ser publicado. Siguiendo las recomendaciones de la NASA publicadas en el Informe sobre UAP del 13 de septiembre de 2023, en UDM no aprobamos comentarios que contribuyan a extender el estigma que tradicionalmente ha caído sobre los testigos de UAP/OVNIs. Contacto con Universo de Misterios: universodemisteriospodcast@gmail.com En la realización de los episodios de Universo de Misterios puede recurrirse a la ayuda de Inteligencia Artificial como herramienta. Puedes hacerte Fan de Universo de Misterios y apoyarlo económicamente obteniendo acceso a todos los episodios cerrados, sin publicidad, desde 1,99 €. Aunque a algunas personas, a veces, puede proporcionar una falsa sensación de alivio, la ignorancia nunca es deseable. Pero eso, tú ya lo sabes... Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! NT - 1916 - Astronáutica: Inicio de la Cuenta Atrás de Artemisa II. Y, después: La Conquista de la Luna. Parte 2 Si va a escribir un comentario, gracias por hacerlo, pero por favor, lea antes las normas de publicación que se encuentran a continuación: (si usted es una persona educada, no tiene que leer las normas). Universo de Misterios tiene reservado el derecho de admisión y publicación de comentarios. Los comentarios son aprobados o rechazados por el departamento de comunicaciones y gestión de comentarios y correos electrónicos de UDM. José Rafael solo lee los comentarios una vez hayan sido publicados. El muro de comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social. No espere que el creador del podcast “debata” con usted. Generalmente, los comentarios anónimos podrían no ser publicados. UDM es un podcast independiente y, por tanto, su contenido expresa el criterio de su autor. La temática general es la Ciencia y el Misterio bien entendido, pero su autor podrá abordar otras temáticas. No está obligado a escuchar UDM, si no le gusta lo que escucha, puede dejar de hacerlo, pero no le diga al autor de lo que debe o no debe hablar en su podcast. No envíe comentarios que contengan falacias lógicas. No de información personal. No espere que su comentario sea respondido necesariamente. Comprenda que se reciben diariamente un elevado número de comentarios que han de ser gestionados, se publiquen o no. Si hace comentarios con afirmaciones dudosas, arguméntelas aportando enlaces a fuentes fiables (recuerde, el muro de Comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social). En caso de no respaldar su comentario como se indica en la caja de descripción del episodio, su comentario podrá no ser publicado. Siguiendo las recomendaciones de la NASA publicadas en el Informe sobre UAP del 13 de septiembre de 2023, en UDM no aprobamos comentarios que contribuyan a extender el estigma que tradicionalmente ha caído sobre los testigos de UAP/OVNIs. Contacto con Universo de Misterios: universodemisteriospodcast@gmail.com En la realización de los episodios de Universo de Misterios puede recurrirse a la ayuda de Inteligencia Artificial como herramienta. Puedes hacerte Fan de Universo de Misterios y apoyarlo económicamente obteniendo acceso a todos los episodios cerrados, sin publicidad, desde 1,99 €. Aunque a algunas personas, a veces, puede proporcionar una falsa sensación de alivio, la ignorancia nunca es deseable. Pero eso, tú ya lo sabes... Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

1925 - Astronáutica y Exploración Espacial: La Colonización de la Luna 441-M-286-M-id14 Si va a escribir un comentario, gracias por hacerlo, pero por favor, lea antes las normas de publicación que se encuentran a continuación: (si usted es una persona educada, no tiene que leer las normas). Universo de Misterios tiene reservado el derecho de admisión y publicación de comentarios. Los comentarios son aprobados o rechazados por el departamento de comunicaciones y gestión de comentarios y correos electrónicos de UDM. José Rafael solo lee los comentarios una vez hayan sido publicados. El muro de comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social. No espere que el creador del podcast “debata” con usted. Generalmente, los comentarios anónimos podrían no ser publicados. UDM es un podcast independiente y, por tanto, su contenido expresa el criterio de su autor. La temática general es la Ciencia y el Misterio bien entendido, pero su autor podrá abordar otras temáticas. No está obligado a escuchar UDM, si no le gusta lo que escucha, puede dejar de hacerlo, pero no le diga al autor de lo que debe o no debe hablar en su podcast. No envíe comentarios que contengan falacias lógicas. No de información personal. No espere que su comentario sea respondido necesariamente. Comprenda que se reciben diariamente un elevado número de comentarios que han de ser gestionados, se publiquen o no. Si hace comentarios con afirmaciones dudosas, arguméntelas aportando enlaces a fuentes fiables (recuerde, el muro de Comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social). En caso de no respaldar su comentario como se indica en la caja de descripción del episodio, su comentario podrá no ser publicado. Siguiendo las recomendaciones de la NASA publicadas en el Informe sobre UAP del 13 de septiembre de 2023, en UDM no aprobamos comentarios que contribuyan a extender el estigma que tradicionalmente ha caído sobre los testigos de UAP/OVNIs. Contacto con Universo de Misterios: universodemisteriospodcast@gmail.com En la realización de los episodios de Universo de Misterios puede recurrirse a la ayuda de Inteligencia Artificial como herramienta. Puedes hacerte Fan de Universo de Misterios y apoyarlo económicamente obteniendo acceso a todos los episodios cerrados, sin publicidad, desde 1,99 €. Aunque a algunas personas, a veces, puede proporcionar una falsa sensación de alivio, la ignorancia nunca es deseable. Pero eso, tú ya lo sabes... Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

1925 - Astronáutica y Exploración Espacial: La Colonización de la Luna 441-M-286-M-id14 Si va a escribir un comentario, gracias por hacerlo, pero por favor, lea antes las normas de publicación que se encuentran a continuación: (si usted es una persona educada, no tiene que leer las normas). Universo de Misterios tiene reservado el derecho de admisión y publicación de comentarios. Los comentarios son aprobados o rechazados por el departamento de comunicaciones y gestión de comentarios y correos electrónicos de UDM. José Rafael solo lee los comentarios una vez hayan sido publicados. El muro de comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social. No espere que el creador del podcast “debata” con usted. Generalmente, los comentarios anónimos podrían no ser publicados. UDM es un podcast independiente y, por tanto, su contenido expresa el criterio de su autor. La temática general es la Ciencia y el Misterio bien entendido, pero su autor podrá abordar otras temáticas. No está obligado a escuchar UDM, si no le gusta lo que escucha, puede dejar de hacerlo, pero no le diga al autor de lo que debe o no debe hablar en su podcast. No envíe comentarios que contengan falacias lógicas. No de información personal. No espere que su comentario sea respondido necesariamente. Comprenda que se reciben diariamente un elevado número de comentarios que han de ser gestionados, se publiquen o no. Si hace comentarios con afirmaciones dudosas, arguméntelas aportando enlaces a fuentes fiables (recuerde, el muro de Comentarios de los episodios de UDM en iVoox NO es una red social). En caso de no respaldar su comentario como se indica en la caja de descripción del episodio, su comentario podrá no ser publicado. Siguiendo las recomendaciones de la NASA publicadas en el Informe sobre UAP del 13 de septiembre de 2023, en UDM no aprobamos comentarios que contribuyan a extender el estigma que tradicionalmente ha caído sobre los testigos de UAP/OVNIs. Contacto con Universo de Misterios: universodemisteriospodcast@gmail.com En la realización de los episodios de Universo de Misterios puede recurrirse a la ayuda de Inteligencia Artificial como herramienta. Puedes hacerte Fan de Universo de Misterios y apoyarlo económicamente obteniendo acceso a todos los episodios cerrados, sin publicidad, desde 1,99 €. Aunque a algunas personas, a veces, puede proporcionar una falsa sensación de alivio, la ignorancia nunca es deseable. Pero eso, tú ya lo sabes...

Johnny Spoiler is back with a savage movie reaction to Deathstalker (2025)—and this one is dripping with fantasy movie vibes, gooey practical effects, and pure chaotic energy.From cursed amulets and pig-faced monsters to goblins casting spells and swords slicing through undead warriors, this episode dives deep into the wild return of a cult classic franchise. If you love 80s sword-and-sorcery nostalgia, over-the-top gore, and DIY B-movie madness, this is your next binge. In this episode:Johnny Spoiler reacts to the insane world of Deathstalker (2025)Goblins, witches, and cursed talismans—fantasy chaos breakdownHow the reboot connects to the original 80s cult classicsWhy this is a MUST-WATCH for horror + fantasy fansThe rise of practical effects and Astron-6's signature style Expect:Guts. Glory. Gore. And one iconic goblin sidekick. Binge-Watchers Podcast brings you sharp takes, wild humor, and unfiltered reactions every week. If you're into:movie reactions, fantasy movies, horror comedy, cult classics, 80s throwbacks, or Johnny Spoiler losing his mind over practical effects…This episode is for you. Binge Now or Regret It Later.I just tried C4's new Cereal Killer energy drink… and yeah, this thing tastes like your childhood in a can. It's got that sweet cereal vibe but actually wakes you up without playing around.If you wanna try it, you can grab it through my link. No pressure—but if you don't, that's on you.And just to be clear—new cereal killer in town… not serial killer. I'm not trying to catch a case. https://amzn.to/4cvqaFl  LISTEN UP, MEAT LOVERS Johnny Spoiler here with a very important life update: Order the meat Eat the meat Share the meat Get PAID for the meatYes, it's that simple. You feast like a king, then pass the link along and start earning like a boss. This is not a drill—this is a carnivorous opportunity.Support the show, fuel your body, and turn your appetite into income. Grab Johnny's affiliate link and get started: Meatzy https://tr.ee/GetMeatzyJohnnyBecause nothing tastes better than steak... except steak that pays you back.

Acabamos hoy este programa especial realizado desde Palencia con Óscar Díez Higuera, físico y miembro de la Agrupación Astronómica Palentina, con quien hablamos de la historia de los eclipses a colación del que se va a ver desde Palencia el próximo mes de agosto

Fake fact check: SA Fuel Panic EXPOSED: Farmers, Astron Shutdown & The Real Story by Radio Islam

SA Fuel Panic EXPOSED: Farmers, Astron Shutdown & The Real Story by Radio Islam

So I mean Star Wars looked pretty good last week, but how does it compare to an actual movie?! Astron Belt will tell us just that, considering it's the first ever major LaserDisc videogame! Join Ben and Wes as they analyze both the movie and the gameplay of Astron Belt, while also taking the time to review Flappy by db-Soft and Dodge Man by Omori in today's episode!Website -https://historyofvideogamespodcast.comYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/@historyofvideogamespodcast1994Twitter - https://twitter.com/HistoryofVideo1Email - historyvgpodcast@gmail.comHosts - Ben & WesMusic - Arranged and recorded by Ben

El 2026 será otro año espectacular para mirar el cielo: llega con un eclipse total de Luna en marzo —la famosa “Luna de sangre”—. Y nos ofrece un eclipse total de Sol en agosto, considerado el evento astronómico más importante del año. Escucha la entrevista con el astrofísico Ángel López Sánchez.

DESPERSION guestmix: 01. Despersion - Ragnarok 02. Synergy - Ego 03. Despersion - Show me 04. PROLIX - GO 05. Despersion - Witch Hunt 06. ID - ID 07. Gydra - Solar Eclipse 08. Despersion - Warhead 09. Delta Heavy - Substance 10. Psynchro & Basotdel - Comeback 11. Submonitor - Let Go 12. Synergy - Mirage 13. Despersion - Take Off 14. Black Sun Empire - Don't You Stasis (V O E Remix) 15. Despersion - Despoir 16. Evol Intent - Flipside (Despersion Remix) 17. Despersion - New place 18. Despersion - Peace (The Martens B(.)(.)tleg) GVOZD vibez: 01. René LaVice ft. Felix Samuel - I Know That I Do (Extended Mix) 02. KBA - Change 03. Fox Stevenson - Exile Is A Habit 04. Bensley, MYLK - Samurai (Extended Mix) 05. Emily Makis - Too Fast (Extended Mix) 06. Clank & Maider, Ekstatic - Everything You Need (feat. Ekstatic) 07. Fox Stevenson - Movin' On 08. TENSION - Higher Place 09. Fox Stevenson - Give Me Some Space 10. T & Sugah, Nu-La - Overflow 11. Kanine - Power 12. two minutes late - Represent (Extended Mix) 13. Sequoia - Run With Me 14. A-Cray - No Return 15. Sindicate, Anizo - Control 16. Capture the Bass, Vecster - Say My Name 17. RiANTHE & Frosta - Pierrot 18. Agressor Bunx - Datakill 19. Bad District - Loki 20. Diode, GNTLMAN - Pirates 21. Place 2b - Serious 22. Logical & Proket (Paperclip & Masheen Remix) - El Nino 23. Tom Finster - Lies Over Lies 24. Mefjus - Step Back (Break Remix) 25. Document One - Frequencies 26. Document One - Brain Teaser 27. DRS, TURNO - Grubby 28. Arkaik, Harley D - Count Us Off 29. Ronin - Street Rules 30. J Bookey, RXNO - Baddies 31. Bogdvn, Azotix - Anserina 32. GGrossy - Rave 33. Milo (UK) - Purple Loud 34. Astron, Bass Ventura - Move 35. Serpnt - Vasuki 36. The Garfield - Turn Cold 37. DJ LLIW, DJ Nai - Tight 38. Dj Linky - Rave This Way 39. Filthy Philp, Inja - Vibes Cost Nothin 40. Molecular - Sisyphus 41. GGrossy - Alarming Surge 42. Charlie Power - Incarnate 43. Dunk - Rastafari 44. Yatuza - Collected 45. In:Most & Hillsdom - Chasm 46. Kalane - Nightquake 47. a sides/Trex - Need (Trex Remix) 48. DJ Die - The Specialist Funk 49. Albert Wesker - Stormy Dub 50. Kalum - Nuh Ordinary 51. Cutty Ranks - Original Ranks (Just Jungle Remix) 52. Beak - Immunity (Elizar Mel Remix) 53. Red Army - Leviathan (Homemade Weapons Remix) 54. Zeds Dead, Imanu, MKLA - Runaway 55. Enduser feat. Nowan - Northern Tribe (Nowan Remix) 56. Sl8r - Times Change 57. In:Most & Visionobi - Rabbit Hole 58. Enduser feat. Homemade Weapons - Where I Found You (Homemade Weapons Remix) 59. Hellacopta - Mindware 60. Suscito - Ode Fewer 61. Gabriella Bongo & dolphoe - Cross The Line 62. keeno - Take A Moment 63. antoanesko - Dreamscapes in Motion 64. T:Base, crsv, Monch MC, Phon & Sone - Tag Team 65. Ze Ibarra - Segredo (DJ Marky Remix) 66. Unknown Artist - Shape Shifting 67. Noppo, Mark Menzies, Genesis Elijah - Go Easy 68. Miss Medik & Drumma ft/ FJ - Transition 69. Electrosoul System - The Beautiful People Around

Las pinturas rupestres de las cuevas de la región cantábrica, como sucede con otros emplazamientos prehistóricos, están llenas de enigmas. Hoy intentamos en el cronovisor analizar su significado y qué hay de cierto en aquellas teorías que pretende identificar algunos dibujos con constelaciones o grupos de estrellas

01. Ruby - All Along 02. Billy Daniel Bunter, FooR, Erire, Sanxion - Waiting For The Night (Tengu Remix) 03. Danny Byrd, MANIA, Mia Kirkland - Done With U 04. T-Trider - Saturday Night 05. Hannah Boleyn - Teardrop (Friction & Subsonic Remix) 06. Mage, Ryan Audley - Return (Extended Mix) 07. SOUL DILLA - Uragan 08. Bass On High, Lelya - Beats Like Fire 09. Ryan Audley & NUWEI - You & Me VIP 10. SOUL DILLA - Atomic Dust 11. Chamelian Audio - LMND 12. SAMMO & PINGZ - Go Fast 13. Tanukichi, Zombie Cats & Bob Ranks - Acid Drop 14. Astron, DON DARKOE - Boots 15. Dub Elements - Balance 16. DJYOUTH - This Feeling 17. ANDATA/2HOT2PLAY - Never Gonna Stop ([Ivy] Remix) 18. Dark Soul - Rare 19. Murdock, Maelie - Violence 20. oneBYone - Alone 21. Chamelian Audio - Light In The Dark (Extended Mix) 22. Tanukichi, Bob Ranks & Con - The Bassline 23. Feed the Fir & OHKAY - Into The Night 24. 7th Sense - The One 25. TIAN & PVC - Motivated 26. Plago - Freeze 27. Ill-Fated - Venom 28. Trueangle - BERU 29. Katharsys - Genetic Hostile 30. Inerpois & Backup - Red Line 31. TMVT - Veil Of Night 32. Paimon - Higher 33. ICEGERGERT & SKY RAE vs Dimension - Наследство (ONEGINЪ BLEND) (KORT EDIT) 34. Dextems - Molot 35. gANGLADESH - Angel Slayer 36. Aim - Autoimmune 37. Neonlight - Purple Radiance 38. TanTron, PVC - Reckoning 39. Paimon - Dream to me 40. JJL - Action 41. Versah - Flowers 42. Dino - Through The Veil 43. Subwave - Levitate 44. Deformaty - Digitally Conscious 45. Wreckless - Lost Without You (Unforced Rhythms Album Sampler 1) 46. Mystic State - AGK 47. Coalessant - Shadow Circuit 48. SMG - Sono VIP 49. Xorgen, MrMontana - Духи Предков 50. Jedi - SYAKARA 51. Molecular - Cold Classic 52. SHOWGUN - Show Me The Lights (Extended Mix) 53. Baroey, TINY Vocals, Mad Sam - Movin' In 54. Wingz - Mistrust 55. Ozma, Avenax - Bez tebia 56. Yatuza & BOXHEAD - Demise 57. PRVAIL - Duppy The Dance 58. Counter Culture - The Time 59. Crystal Clear, Riya - Overlook 60. Pruf - Be A Hero 61. Humb - Higher & Higher 62. BufoBufo - Ranidae 63. Jade Sierra, Malixe - Explicacion 64. Anku - Witchdoctor 65. PRVAIL & Pharoah - City Shadows 66. Eternal dnb - Aeon's Veil 67. Hybrid Minds - Why (Fourward Remix) 68. X-E-Dos - Coiled Spring 69. Akuma - Cryo 70. Anku - War Declared 71. Pesolife & Mars Meddo - OBSESSED 72. Nixxy Rain - Lawyer 73. Keylo & Duoscience - See You Again 74. Frame - Movement 75. Tyrone & Minus - Voyager 76. The Analyst - Groove Therapy 77. Kadence - Play Those Games 78. BAILEY - Endless Day 79. Singlep - Fire Ice Alpha Centauri 80. CrucifyMe - Luna 81. Euphorics, Qua Rush - Ciapaqua 82. Felov - Stay 83. Muwa feat. Frosper - Last Hope

Desde su descubrimiento en 1930, Platón fue considerado un planeta, hasta la reunión de la Unión Astronómica Internacional (UAI) en Praga, en 2006. Ni siquiera había recorrido un cuarto de su órbita cuando la comunidad científica se dio cuenta de que era diferente. Era mucho más pequeño de lo que Lowell, su descubridor, había predicho. Tampoco era un gigante de gas, como se creía. Además, a partir de los años 90, la tecnología mejoró tanto que se empezaron a descubrir otros cuerpos en esa misma zona, lo que hoy se conoce como el Cinturón de Kuiper. Algunos de estos cuerpos tenían un tamaño similar a Plutón. De repente, el Sistema Solar podía pasar de 9 planetas a 15 o a 25.Ante ello, la UAI decidió que para ser un planeta, los cuerpos debían cumplir tres condiciones. Platón no encajaba en todas ellas. Por ejemplo, no era una roca muerta, está vivo geológicamente. Tiene glaciares de nitrógeno que fluyen como si fueran pasta de dientes. Tiene montañas de hielo de agua tan duras como la roca de granito aquí en la Tierra, que se elevan 3.000 metros hacia su cielo negro. Y tiene esa famosa «mancha» con forma de corazón, la Tombaugh Regio, que es una vasta planicie de hielos exóticos. Asimismo, Plutón tiene cinco lunas. La más grande, Caronte, es tan enorme en comparación con Plutón (tiene la mitad de su tamaño) que técnicamente no orbitan uno alrededor del otro, sino que se mueven como dos iguales.