Podcast appearances and mentions of perry anderson

On Perry Anderson's "Internationalism: A Breviary". [For the full episode subscribe at patreon.com/bungacast] We kick off the second block/theme of the 2024/25 Reading Club on Nations & Internationalism in the 21st Century by looking at a 2002 essay which charts nationalism against internationalism from the Atlantic revolutions through to the age of globalisation. It is particularly apposite to revisit this text in light of an acceleration in de-globalisation brought on by the second Trump presidency. What are the cultural aspects of "internationalism"? While nationalism can be good or bad, internationalism is usually seen as positive. Is this still the case? How has internationalism accompanied, seperated from or stood against nationalism throughout the latter's history? How is internationalism different from cosmopolitanism today, if at all? How could we update Anderson's charting of internationalism along 5 coordinates: capital, geography, philosophy, nation-definition, and class relations? Internationalism: A Breviary, Perry Anderson, New Left Review

Depois do primeiro episódio em que ouvimos falar sobre livros portugueses que contribuíram para o processo revolucionário do 25 de Abril, vamos agora focar a nossa atenção na literatura anticolonial, cujos contornos são mais internacionais, mas mais difíceis de definir. A lista de livros a discutir começa pelas obras do jornalista Basil Davidson da década de 1950, do antropólogo norte-americano Marvin Harris, Portugal's African "Wards" - A First-Hand Report on Labor and Education in Moçambique (1958) e de James Duffy, Portuguese Africa (1959). A esta configuração anglo-americana pertencem, igualmente: o livro do jornalista português António de Figueiredo, que terá sido ajudado, tanto por Harris como por Davidson, na publicação do seu livro intitulado Portugal and its Empire: the Truth (1961); bem como o de Perry Anderson, Portugal and the End of Ultra-Colonialism (1962). Do lado francês, a revista Présence Africaine acolheu nacionalistas angolanos nas suas lutas pela independência, como foi o caso de Mário Pinto de Andrade e do escritor Castro Soromenho. O Padre Robert Davezies, conhecido por ter denunciado as atrocidades da Guerra da Argélia, emprestou a sua voz à causa de Angola, num primeiro livro Les Angolais (1965), a que se seguiu La Guerre d'Angola (1968). São também lembrados os textos de dois combatentes pela libertação da Guiné e de Moçambique: é o caso de Amilcar Cabral, que escreveu a introdução à obra de Basil Davidson, The Liberation of Guiné: Aspects of an African Revolution (1969), bem como de Eduardo Mondlane, The Struggle for Mozambique (1969). Nesta sequência, é ainda considerada a intervenção do Padre Hastings na denúncia do massacre de Wiriamu, ocorrido em 1972. São ainda referidas obras mais dispersas e até de certa forma híbridas, como é o caso de ‘Negritude e humanismo’, um opúsculo publicado pela Casa dos Estudantes do Império em 1964, de Alfredo Margarido. O escritor e investigador construiu uma articulação rara entre produção literária e investigação histórica e antropológica. Esta última tinha, aliás, raízes na criatividade dos surrealistas, representados na passagem de Cruzeiro Seixas por Angola, iniciada na década de 1950. Paralelamente, a tradução portuguesa de Os condenados da terra de Frantz Fanon, com prefácio de Jean-Paul Sartre, aponta para um outro facto editorial conseguido na contra-corrente da censura, em meados da década de 1960. O debate é moderado por Isabel Castro Henriques e conta com a participação de Aurora Santos, Bernardo Cruz, José Augusto Pereira, Manuela Ribeiro Sanches, Nuno Domingos e Víctor Barros. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On the late Dmitri Furman's account of post-Soviet Russia. Patreon Exclusive: for the Reading Club, join for $12/mo and get access to ALL Bungacast content, incl. 4 exclusive, original episodes a month We continue our discussions along this year's themes (rise and fall of nations; Russia past and present) by tackling Imitation Democracy: The Development of Russia's Post-Soviet Political System. Why has there been a revival in interest in the late Soviet and early post-Soviet period? And in the global 1990s in general? What does it really mean to be without-alternative? Why didn't democracy take hold in Russia? And why did it become an "imitation democracy" and not something else? How was Yeltsin a disaster? And what was Putin's appeal? Does 'Putinism' actually exist? Is it interesting or novel in any way? What happened after Furman's death and Russia's turn to "violent parody of the West"? Readings: Imitation Democracy: The Development of Russia's Post-Soviet Political System, Dmitri Furman, Verso Imitation Democracies: The Post-Soviet Penumbra, Dmitri Furman, New Left Review (pdf) Imitation Democracy: Perry Anderson writes about Dmitri Furman's analysis of Russia's post-communism, Perry Anderson, London Review of Books Listening Links: /114/ Reading Club: The Light That Failed - on the end of the "Age of Imitation" /270/ Russia vs the West ft. Richard Sakwa - on the endgame to war in Ukraine; and /271/ Russia vs the West (2) ft. Richard Sakwa - on the post-Soviet landscape /410/ Reading Club: Deutscher's Stalin - On Isaac Deutscher's classic Stalin: A Political Biography /421/ Who Are the Wrong Ukrainians? ft. Volodymyr Ishchenko - on post-Soviet Ukraine, from Maidan to war   Music: Éva Csepregi, "O.K. Gorbacsov", Hungaroton , WEA, High Fashion Music, Dureco

When Immanuel Wallerstein died in 2019, he was one of the most influential thinkers about the crisis-ridden development of global capitalism. People who might never have read one of his books will still find themselves referring to the core and the periphery of the capitalist world-system.Gregory Williams joins Long Reads to take a deeper look today at Wallerstein's life and work as a radical intellectual. Gregory is a professor of political science and international relations at Simmons University in Boston. He's also the author of Contesting the Global Order: The Radical Political Economy of Perry Anderson and Immanuel Wallerstein.Read Gregory's piece for Jacobin, "Immanuel Wallerstein's Work Can Help Us Understand the Deepening Crises of Capitalism" here: https://jacobin.com/2023/12/immanuel-wallerstein-world-systems-theory-development-cycles-capitalism-crisis-historyLong Reads is a Jacobin podcast looking in-depth at political topics and thinkers, both contemporary and historical, with the magazine's longform writers. Hosted by features editor Daniel Finn. Produced by Conor Gillies, music by Knxwledge. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

La palabra posmodernidad o posmoderno ha terminado por adquirir tantas definiciones y significados, alude a tantas corrientes y contextos que en ocasiones resulta extremadamente confusa. Sin embargo es un concepto clave para comprender nuestro tiempo y en especial para la gente que se dedica al arte o la literatura. Gracias a la historia sobre el origen de la posmodernidad que Perry Anderson escribió a finales del siglo pasado podemos comprender de forma muy clara de qué estamos hablando cuando hablamos de posmodernidad.

Rev. Perry Anderson talks about our need to discern and keep focused on the truth. Watch this episode on our YouTube channel:https://youtu.be/b_28vj7iO0A

Well we held off as long as we could, but we're back to discussing transition debate stuff. This time we attempt to take on Japan's unique path to capitalism and its equally unique brand of "feudalism." Reading: "Japanese Feudalism" from Lineages of the Absolutist State (1974) by Perry Anderson and "The Prussia of the East?"(1991) by Perry Anderson Send us a question, comment or valid concern: auxiliarystatements(at)gmail.com DISCORD: https://discord.gg/xXDUMZ2a

In this episode we get the Perry Anderson treatment and ask if we philosophers are the problem with how Western Marxism has evolved over time. We discuss what Anderson calls the formal and thematic shifts that happened within this theoretical tradition once the philosophers got in the driver's seat. Partly ethnographic, partly analytical, and a little more meta-philosophical than usual. We hope you'll indulge us this once as we ask ourselves what the hell we're doing. leftofphilosophy.com | @leftofphilReferences:Perry Anderson, Considerations on Western Marxism (London: Verso Books, 1979).Music:Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

On violence and the lack of political resolution.   Regular guest Alex Gourevitch joins us to discuss why the Israel/Palestine conflict is so intractable – and why it draws so much attention. Alex then explains why, lamentably, there is no side worth choosing.   We then delve into various key points:  why Hamas was becoming irrelevant and how the 7 October attack was an attempt to combat that;  why violence is necessary but the Palestinians are in a catch-22;  how the West is implicated in the violence and callousness on show;  why the Palestinians are the most oppressed and forgotten people;  why Hamas is not an anticolonial freedom struggle; and  what is the right way to compare this to Ukraine. Links: No end in sight: Israel's search for a Gaza strategy, Lawrence Freedman, FT (attached) The House of Zion, Perry Anderson, NLR Whither Palestine, David Polansky, Strange Frequencies  

Adam Tooze returns to PTO to respond to the many excellent questions sent in by listeners. Become a £5 supporter on patreon to get access to this and other episodes of PTO Extra! Go to patreon.com/poltheoryother to sign up. We talked about Perry Anderson's take on Adam's work in the New Left Review, why Adam - despite his engagement with Marxist thought and frequent appearances in left media and events - defines himself as a left liberal rather than a socialist. We also talked about his view of the significance of the US inflation reduction act, and the dire state of the UK economy. We went on to talk about the economic and social crisis in Lebanon and why Adam thinks the situation in the country and the broader region does not get the attention it deserves.

Adam Tooze returns to PTO to respond to the many excellent questions sent in by listeners. Become a £5 supporter on patreon to get access to this and other episodes of PTO Extra! Go to patreon.com/poltheoryother to sign up. We talked about Perry Anderson's take on Adam's work in the New Left Review, why Adam - despite his engagement with Marxist thought and frequent appearances in left media and events - defines himself as a left liberal rather than a socialist. We also talked about his view of the significance of the US inflation reduction act, and the dire state of the UK economy. We went on to talk about the economic and social crisis in Lebanon and why Adam thinks the situation in the country and the broader region does not get the attention it deserves.

Adam Tooze returns to PTO to respond to the many excellent questions sent in by listeners. Become a £5 supporter on patreon to get access to this and other episodes of PTO Extra! Go to patreon.com/poltheoryother to sign up. We talked about Perry Anderson's take on Adam's work in the New Left Review, why Adam - despite his engagement with Marxist thought and frequent appearances in left media and events - defines himself as a left liberal rather than a socialist. We also talked about his view of the significance of the US inflation reduction act, and the dire state of the UK economy. We went on to talk about the economic and social crisis in Lebanon and why Adam thinks the situation in the country and the broader region does not get the attention it deserves.

Annette en Mathieu hebben het over de spannende verkiezingsstrijd in Turkije, die op het scherpst van de snede wordt gevoerd. Wat betekent het voor Europa, mocht Erdogan straks van het politieke toneel verdwijnen? En op welke manier staat het Eurovisiesongfestival symbool voor de relatie tussen de EU en het Turkije onder Erdogan? Tips uit deze aflevering: - Kom gezellig naar Café Europa Live in Den Haag in Nieuwspoort op 5 juli https://www.haagschcollege.nl/... - Mathieu raadt het boek 'The New Old World' aan van Perry Anderson. https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/f/th... - Annette tipt de serie Van de Schoonheid en de troost, van Wim Kayzer: https://www.vpro.nl/programmas... - Chef redactie Freek raadt ‘Erdogan in een notendop aan' van Joost Lagendijk https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/f/er... Muziek uit deze aflevering: - Sertab Erener won in 2003 het Songfestival voor Turkije, met het nummer Everyway that I can https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - Conchita Wurst met haar versie van Everyway that I can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Over Café Europa: - Mathieu Segers en Annette van Soest bespreken om de week de achtergronden bij het Europese nieuws. Han Dirk Hekking - Europaverslaggever FD en Derk Marseille - correspondent in Duitsland voor oa BNR Nieuwsradio zijn terugkerende stamgasten - Annette van Soest is presentator en journalist oa voor Haagsch College en BNR Nieuwsradio - Mathieu Segers is hoogleraar hedendaagse Europese geschiedenis en Europese integratie aan Maastricht University - Freek Ewals is de oprichter en programmamaker van Haagsch College en doet de redactie van Café Europa Café Europa is een initiatief van Haagsch College en Studio Europa Maastricht

In Different Speeds, Same Furies, Perry Anderson measures the achievement of Anthony Powell’s Dance to the Music of Time against Proust’s more celebrated In Search of Lost Time – and finds Powell to be superior in certain key respects. Anderson discusses why a comparison between two writers at once so similar and dissimilar sheds new light on their greatest work, and literary construction more generally. He was joined by novelist and LRB contributing editor John Lanchester, for whom both writers have been lifelong touchstones. Find more events at the Bookshop: lrb.me/events Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On this episode, historian Dr. Ivan Kurilla from European University in St. Petersburg shares about his research on the rich and little-known history of US-Russia relations since the 18th century. Dr. Kurilla explains how the US and Russia are "constitutive others" that have developed historically within the same political language, were both projections of the Greater Europe, and at times shared similar social and political upheaval and transformation. Please visit European University's website at https://eusp.org/ for more on their program for international students (as described by Dr. Kurilla in the episode) held now in Yerevan, Armenia. https://eusp.org/en/news/eusp-revamped-international-programs-explore-what-is-happening-in-russia-and-eurasia-today ABOUT THE GUEST Ivan Kurilla is a Professor of History and International Relations at European University, St. Petersburg. His primary field of interest is the history of U.S.-Russian relations, especially during the American antebellum and Civil War periods. In addition, he has organized workshops, published articles, and edited volumes on the use of history, historical memory, and historical politics in Russia and the post-Soviet space. Dr. Kurilla has also published articles on relations between the state and society in contemporary Russia. His articles have been published in the leading Russian historical journals, as well as in the Journal of American History, Demokratizatsiya, Journal of Cold War Studies, Problems of Post-Communism, and Nationalities Papers. In 2010 he translated into Russian the classic monograph by Perry Anderson, Lineages of the Absolutist State. Dr. Kurilla serves on the editorial board of Amerikanskii ezhegodnik (American Yearbook) of Moscow's Russian Academy of Sciences. He is a member of the council of the Russian Society for U.S. History Studies and a member of the council of the Free Historical Society. PRODUCER'S NOTE: This episode was recorded on November 12th, 2022 at the Palmer House Hilton in Chicago, Illinois during the ASEEES 2022 Convention. If you have questions, comments, or would like to be a guest on the show, please email slavxradio@utexas.edu and we will be in touch! CREDITS Host/Assistant Producer: Misha Simanovskyy (@MSimanovskyy) Associate Producer: Lera Toropin (@earlportion) Associate Producer: Cullan Bendig (@cullanwithana) Associate Producer: Taylor Ham Associate Producer: Sergio Glajar Social Media Manager: Eliza Fisher Supervising Producer: Katherine Birch Recording, Editing, and Sound Design: Michelle Daniel Music Producer: Charlie Harper (@charlieharpermusic) www.charlieharpermusic.com (Main Theme by Charlie Harper and additional background music by Makaih Beats, Mindseye, Paradigm, Chad Crouch, Uncanny) Executive Producer & Creator: Michelle Daniel (@MSDaniel) DISCLAIMER: Texas Podcast Network is brought to you by The University of Texas at Austin. Podcasts are produced by faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft content that adheres to journalistic best practices. The University of Texas at Austin offers these podcasts at no charge. Podcasts appearing on the network and this webpage represent the views of the hosts, not of The University of Texas at Austin. https://files.fireside.fm/file/fireside-uploads/images/9/9a59b135-7876-4254-b600-3839b3aa3ab1/P1EKcswq.png Special Guest: Ivan Kurilla.

On the global left after the Cold War. [Patreon Exclusive] Has the left declined, been defeated, or is it dead? Is the continuity with the Old and New Lefts of the 20th century, or should we understand 1989 as marking a definitive break? We use a long essay by Swedish Marxist sociologist Göran Therborn in the latest New Left Review as a plank to examine these questions. Therborn tries to present a synoptic analysis of where the left is, globally speaking, almost a quarter of the way into the 21st century. Is he right that the old dialectics of industrialism and colonialism are no longer operative - and that no new dialectic has emerged?  And is trying to present a "balance sheet" a valid approach in the first place?   FILL OUT OUR 2022 LISTENER SURVEY: tinyurl.com/bunga2022survey Links: The World and the Left, Göran Therborn, New Left Review (2022) Renewals, Perry Anderson, New Left Review (2000) /37/ The Ghosts of May ‘68 ft. Catherine Liu, Bungacast OK BUNGER! The Problem of Generations, ep. 3 (Boomers), Bungacast

What is Marxism? Is Capitalism really that bad? Does communism have anything to say about the climate struggle? Can we really hope for a transformed communist future? Rayne and Mika chat with their favourite lecturer, Associate Professor Dr. Chamsy el-Ojeili. Chamsy is a sociologist and lecturer in the School of Social and Cultural Studies at Te Herenaga Waka - Victoria University Wellington. Mika, Rayne, and Chamsy chat about capitalism, ecosocialism, and what Marxism says about our contemporary struggles. Chamsy offers honesty and hope in being both a Christian and a communist. Show notes Council communism Rutger Bregman, Humankind: A Hopeful History (2020) Participatory Budgeting Alasdair MacIntyre, Marxism and Christianity (1971) Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels, The Holy Family (1844) Ernst Bloch, Heritage of Our Times (1935) Ernst Bloch, The Principle of Hope (1954) Terry Eagleton, Why Marx Was Right (2011) Perry Anderson, Considerations on Western Marxism (1976) The Magnificast – Christian socialist podcast The Dig Radio – Jacobin podcast New Left Review journal Counterfutures journal Brian Zahnd, When Everything's on Fire (2021) David Bentley Hart, Tradition and Apocalypse (2022) Enzo Traverso, Fire and Blood: The European Civil War, 1914-1945 (2007) Definitions… Bourgeoisie: a social class comprised of people who own the means of production (factories, land, raw materials, machinery, etc) and therefore own most of society's capital and wealth. The interests of the bourgeoises (aka ruling or capitalist class) are centred on increasing profits. Proletariat: a social class comprised of workers without access to the means of production, and therefore are dependent on exchanging labour power for a wage. Marx believed the working class is fundamentally exploited and oppressed to produce profits for the capitalist class, and will ultimately overthrow the bourgeoisie creating a classless society. Gramsci: Antonio Gramsci was an Italian Marxist thinker, 1891–1937. He moved beyond the classic Marxist materialist approach to consider the place of ideas, culture, morality, feelings, and values in shaping collective will and influencing social reform. Fukuyama: Francis Fukuyama wrote The End of History and the Last Man in 1992. He believed liberalism had won the struggle for power through the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. He claimed that history has ended with global, liberal, democratic capitalism as the final form of economic, social, and political governance. -- This podcast is associated with Chaplaincy VUW. Feedback to aldridrayn@myvuw.ac.nz

Perry Anderson, Partner; Todd Cawley, Partner and Lake Speed Jr., Tribologist. Hosted by Brad Gillie from SiriusXM ch 90, Late Shift. Presented by ARP, Inc. & Performance Plus Global Logistics.

Outside of the frenzied headlines about woke warriors cancelling Jane Austen and stately homes, we're living in a period of renewed consideration of Britain's colonial history. The British Empire began before the English Civil War, and shaped our country for 400 years. At its height, it covered almost a quarter of the entire world's population. Beyond statues and street names, how is the empire still shaping our lives today? Ayeisha is joined by Dr Kojo Koram, lecturer in law at Birkbeck and author of Uncommon Wealth: Britain and the Aftermath of Empire. - Grab a copy of the book here: https://www.hachette.co.uk/titles/kojo-koram/uncommon-wealth/9781529338652/ - Further reading from Perry Anderson here: https://www.versobooks.com/authors/81-perry-anderson - And from Tom Nairn here: https://www.versobooks.com/authors/821-tom-nairn - More from Kojo here: https://www.plutobooks.com/9780745342047/empires-endgame/ ----- Researched by Margaret Welsh. Produced by Becky Malone. Music by Poddington Bear under Creative Commons license. Enjoying the show? Tweet us your comments and questions @NEF! The New Economics Podcast is brought to you by the New Economics Foundation. Find out more at www.neweconomics.org

This week Dan & Jack return from their COVID hiatus to finish up Perry Anderson's C L A S S I C text and talk feudalism. Specifically, what was it, where did it come from, how did it differ from place to place and what caused its seemingly inevitable crisis and collapse. Reading - Part 2 - ''Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism'' (1974) by Perry Anderson

. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/anarkademia/message

DISCORD: https://discord.gg/Ym8Bwmaz LINKTREE: https://linktr.ee/AuxiliaryStatementsPodcast This week Jack and Dan cover the first half of Anderson's classic book on the transition to feudalism. They cover the rise of the slave mode of production in Antiquity from its initial emergence as a solution to class struggle in Greece to its peak during thee Roman Empire. Whilst this mode of production allowed the ancient states to reach stunning cultural heights it was also wracked with internal contradictions that would be its undoing. The eventual crisis was one of an under supply of slaves and whilst the eventual demise of Western Roman Empire was a protracted affair, when the invaders came, their fate was sealed by weaknesses stemming from the mode of production. According to Anderson a new synthesis developed over the next several centuries, a synthesis of two political economies in crisis and decay. It was the melding of Roman and Germanic ways of life that gave rise to the feudal mode of production. Reading - Part 1 - ''Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism'' (1974) by Perry Anderson

We're back from our summer break with David, Helen and Adam Tooze exploring what the pandemic has revealed about politics, economics and the new world order. From Covid crisis to China crisis to climate crisis: how does it all fit together? And what comes next? Adam's new book is Shutdown: How Covid Shook the World's Economy. Plus David talks about his new book based on series one of History of Ideas: Confronting Leviathan. Talking Points:The term ‘lockdown' can be misleading. Many aspects of the response were not top-down.Most of the reduction in mobility predated government mandate.The financial markets made huge moves and central banks then had to step in.The popular response cannot be separated from the actions of the state.The term ‘shutdown' better captures the pandemic's impact on the economy.Huge parts of the productive economy literally ground to a halt. It seems like central banks learned something from the last crisis.Is there still a realistic prospect of normalization? Adam and Helen are skeptical. Is there such thing as democratic money?If so, then democracy has changed.The condition of possibility for the freedom of action of central bankers is a political vacuum.Parts of the left see an opportunity in monetary politics. The entire monetary order in China is political, but there was a debate within the regime over stimulus.The conservatives won out.Some Western financial leaders used this to push back against central bankers in their own countries. The Republican party is becoming increasingly incoherent.Some, such as Mnuchin, emphasize the structural necessity of some kind of continuity. Others, such as Jay Powell, argue that the priority is confronting China. There is an ongoing de-centering from the West in a dollar-based world. The U.S.-China competition has changed. We have moved from a realm of competition over GDP growth rates to a much starker contest involving hard power.The tech sanctions are a sovereignty issue, not just an economic issue.Mentioned in this Episode:Adam's new book, ShutdownJames Meadway on neoliberalismRudiger Dornbusch, Essays (1998/2001)Quinn Slobodian on right-wing globalistsPerry Anderson's review of Adam's work, and Adam's responseMarx's Capital Volume 1Helen's book, Oil and the Western Economic CrisisDaniela Gabor on macrofinance 

In this episode we bring on Private Equity expert Perry Anderson to share the fascinating inside baseball of buying companies with no capital.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

After the ‘End of History' is a podcast about International Relations and History. It is part of the Hawks & Sparrows project. Want more? Please consider supporting the podcast on Patreon to receive bonus episodes, as well as early releases of the monthly Hawks & Sparrows newsletter. You can also follow us on Twitter @after_history. Thanks for listening,Mario and Tom *Episode 28 continues our discussion on Turkish political history with a focus on the administrations of Mustafa İsmet İnönü, Adnan Menderes, Sami Süleyman Gündoğdu Demirel, and  Halil Turgut Özal. From World War II to the post-Soviet era, we explore what Perry Anderson means when he describes the post-Kemalist period in terms of "cycles of the Centre-Right."   

After the ‘End of History' is a podcast about International Relations and History. It is part of the Hawks & Sparrows project. Want more? Please consider supporting the podcast on Patreon to receive bonus episodes, as well as early releases of the monthly Hawks & Sparrows newsletter. You can also follow us on Twitter @after_history. Thanks for listening,Mario and Tom *Episode 27 is the first in a series on Turkish politics, drawing from several scholarly articles in New Left Review, one published shortly before, the other coming a year after the "small world war" in Nagorno-Karabakh, the topic that we intended to focus on from the outset. As with most episodes, the focal topic exploded into a much broader discussion, beginning with a general reconstruction of Turkish political history from the Ottoman Empire to the Ataturk years. Needless to say, we're not experts in this history, but we leaned on our ol' pal Perry Anderson to guide us along to the heart of our research on the Erdogan period. Readings for this series include: Turkey at the Crossroads by CIHAN TUĞALA Small World War by GEORGI DERLUGUIANThe New Old World by PERRY ANDERSONThe music you hear on After the End of History is provided by Jason King. This episode also features a sample of Fikret Kizilok. 

Kemalizm konusundaki yayına gelen tepkiler arasında, bugünün sorunun Kemalizm olmadığı, 2021'de 1930'ların konuşulmasının yersizliği gibi yargılar yanında Kemalist halkçılığın sınıfsızlık tezinin inkarına varan değerlendirmeler dikkat çekiyordu. İngiliz Marxist kuramcı Perry Anderson, “Kemalism” başlıklı yazısından sonra kaleme aldığı “Kemal'den Sonra” adlı uzun makalesinde, laiklik ve devletçilik ilkelerindeki değişime rağmen, Kemalizm'in daha derinde yatan temeline, “bütünleşmeci milliyetçiliğe” hiç dokunulmadığını vurguluyor. Kanımca, buradan yola çıkarak, laiklik ilkesindeki değişimin Diyanet'in milli bütünleşme ile görevli kılınması biçiminde karşımıza çıktığını görmekteyiz ki burada Kemalizm ile bir karşıtlık değil, bir devamlılık bulunmaktadır. Aynı şey, özelleştirmeci, piyasacı yaklaşımla devletçilik ilişkisi için de geçerlidir. Keza, bütünleşmeci (tekçi) milliyetçiliğin Rum pogromları, Alevi katliamları ve Kürt sorununu yaratan baskı gibi unsurlarla birlikte sürdürüldüğünü de Kemalizm'in devamlılığı olarak tesbit etmemiz gerekiyor. Buna ek olarak, çok parti ile sınıf çatışması arasında ilişki kuran Kemalizm'in tek-partiyi meşrulaştıran yaklaşımı ile çok partili dönemdeki parti kapatmalar, 12 Eylül'ün seçim ve parti mevzuatına “olabildiğince az parti ve koalisyonsuz iktidar” perspektifinden getirdiği yaklaşım ve nihayet bugün aynı yaklaşımın vardığı bir zirve olarak tek adam otoriterliği aynı devamlılık çizgisi içinde yer almaktadır. Bu devamlılığı teşhis, Türkiye'nin daha demokratik bir geleceğe erişebilmesi için elzem olan yeni anayasa tasavvuru için zorunluluktur.

Perry Anderson, CEO; Mark Heywood, Tribologist and Chris Davis, NHRA Team Owner. Hosted by Brad Gillie from SiriusXM ch 90, Late Shift.

We discuss the third and final in the series of Perry Anderson essays on the EU in the London Review of Books, "The Breakaway", and wonder if the EU can - despite its crises - just carry on indefinitely. Reading Clubs are for monthly subscribers $10+. Sign up at patreon.com/bungacast

We discuss the second of Perry Anderson's three LRB essays on the making and unmaking of the EU: "Ever Closer Union?"  Our monthly Reading Club is for patrons $10+. Sign up at patreon.com/bungacast

We discuss the first of Perry Anderson's new essays on Europe published in the London Review of Books, which focuses on Luuk van Middelaar - described as the EU's first organic intellectual. We discuss what that means, as well as the role of the "coup" in forming the EU. Reading Club episodes are for subscribers $10+. Sign up at patreon.com/bungacast

In 1969, on the ninth floor of a Sir George Williams University building a peaceful protest was underway. Six Black students had accused their professor, Perry Anderson, of discrimination and when students felt the university's administration had not done a proper investigation, 200 students staged a sit-in. The event did not end as peacefully as it started.Watch the documentary "Ninth Floor" by Mina Shum on YouTube; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRNnTMIUe2A&ab_channel=NFB  Don't forget to subscribe and follow on Instagram @racism.is.nonsense for posts all month long!https://www.instagram.com/racism.is.nonsense/?hl=enlinktr.ee/KnowNonsensePodcast

At last we wrap our discussion on Perry Anderson's excellent American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers with a summary conversation. For those that may be joining the podcast for the first time, this would be a great entry point for understanding Anderson's recent Marxist scholarship, where he has focused on the social, economic and political development of the great and emerging powers of the world. His other books include The New Old World, Brazil Apart and recent studies on Britain (see NLR 125) and the EU (see LRB 17 December 2020 and 7 January 2021). Breaking into a more informal discussion of what we think this work offers activists and writers opposed to US imperialism, we drill into some theoretical issues around the state and society, the role of intellectuals and strategy (uniquely?) in American foreign policy, while also projecting out beyond the book's scope, which was published midway through Obama's second term, into the Trump administration and after. As a segue into the next book under discussion -- Kishore Mahbubani's Has China Won? -- we also tackle some issues around the rise of China as a geopolitical rival to America's global hegemony and what that might mean for the direction of American foreign policy in the near to mid-term. Join us for a more in depth discussion on this topic in Episode 16. Jason King continues to kindly provide the music that you hear in After the 'End of History.' Thanks for listening.  

Após impasse entre o presidente e governadores, Renan Quinalha comenta o julgamento ocorrido no STF sobre o reconhecimento da competência de estados e municípios para determinar se a vacinação deve ou não ser compulsória. Laura Carvalho analisa os fatores que podem estar levanto à nova alta da inflação e faz previsões para o cenário econômico de 2021.Dica:"Brasil à Parte", Perry Anderson - https://www2.boitempoeditorial.com.br/produto/brasil-a-parte-937Envie comentários, dúvidas e sugestões usando a #entretanto no Twitter ou mande um email para entretantopodcast@gmail.comApresentação: Laura Carvalho e Renan QuinalhaDireção: Bruno HorowiczEdição: Bruno Horowicz e Julia LeiteProdução: Gustavo Rosa de Moura e Marina PersonProdutora: Mira Filmes

In the fifth installment of our focus on Perry Anderson's American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers, we reconstruct the last three chapters of "Imperium." The presentations cover the period from the Nixon administration through the first half of Obama's second term. Recalibrations: Gopal -- 00:00:00 to 00:27:52Liberalism Militant: Tom -- 00:28:32 to 00:55:02The Incumbent: Mario -- 00:55:33 to 01:43:45Jason King kindly provides the music that you hear in After the 'End of History.' You can find more of his work on Soundcloud. 

In part II of our discussion on Perry Anderson's American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers, we take a deeper look at the first three chapters of "Imperium," reading the dynamics between exceptionalism (isolation from the "fallen world") and universalism (making the world in America's image) that can be found in the period from America's founding to the Second World War. We also tackle the emergence of National Security in the foreign policy establishment vis a vis Truman, Kennan and the 'containment' of the Soviet Union. Chapter discussion markers:I. "Prodromes": 00:00:45 II "Crystallization": 00:21:33III. "Security": 00:46:08 Jason King kindly provides the music that you hear in After the 'End of History.' You can find more of his work on Soundcloud. 

In our eighth episode, we introduce the work and thought of Perry Anderson, the leading intellectual figure behind the New Left Review and author of several modern classics of Marxist political thought. We've chosen to dedicate the next few episodes of the podcast to American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers to discuss how his historical materialist understanding of the long-term trajectory of capitalism and the interstate system frames his perspective on America's rise to global hegemony. We're joined by our friend Gopal to help draw out the nuances and broader theoretical context of this challenging but rewarding text. Part I includes a brief introduction to Anderson's work, contextualizing American Foreign Policy within his better known works, such as Lineages of the Absolute State and Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. We also share some thoughts on how his work has impacted our own critical attitudes toward American foreign policy, particularly the "regnant liberalism" that has repeatedly justified imperialist interventions abroad. (See "Arms and Rights" in NLR 31.)Finally, we begin our reconstruction of the book's main topics with a focus on the Preface and Introduction to Imperium, the work's first of two parts (the second being Consilium). Here Anderson lays out what distinguishes his work from other historical scholarship, particularly in its chronological sweep and the interrelation between ("First World") capitalist states both before and after the establishment of American supremacy within the capitalist system.Jason King kindly provides the music that you hear in After the 'End of History.' You can find more of his work on Soundcloud. 

With guest Asad Haider, we discuss at length the theoretical polemic of E.P. Thompson against Louis Althusser. What was the historical context for each side of this conflict (in which Althusser never participated directly)? What was Thompson’s critique? Asad argues that Thompson did not understand Althusser correctly, or even provide a satisfactory conceptual account of what was best about his own empirical research. The two, may have been closer to each other than Thompson understood. A humanist, he preferred the young Marx; Althusser, an anti-humanist, argued systematically for the importance of the mature Marx. Both, however, were reacting to the Stalinist ossification of their respective national Communist parties. Readings discussed in this episode: Louis Althusser, For Marx https://www.versobooks.com/books/35-for-marx Louis Althusser, “Contradiction and Overdetermination” (from For Marx) https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1962/overdetermination.htm Louis Althusser, Etienne Balibar, Roger Establet, Pierre Macherey, and Jacques Rancière, Reading Capital https://www.versobooks.com/books/2042-reading-capital Louis Althusser, “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm Perry Anderson, “Origins of the Present Crisis” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I23/articles/perry-anderson-origins-of-the-present-crisis Perry Anderson, Arguments Within English Marxism https://www.versobooks.com/books/576-arguments-within-english-marxism Asad Haider, Mistaken Identity: Race and Class in the Age of Trump https://www.versobooks.com/books/2716-mistaken-identity Karl Marx, Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy/appx1.htm E.P. Thompson, “The Peculiarities of the English” https://www.marxists.org/archive/thompson-ep/1965/english.htm E.P. Thompson, “An Open Letter to Leszek Kolakowski” https://www.marxists.org/archive/thompson-ep/1973/kolakowski.htm E.P. Thompson, “The Poverty of Theory: Or, An Orrery of Errors” https://www.marxists.org/archive/thompson-ep/1978/pot/intro.htm E.P. Thompson, “Outside the Whale” https://www.marxists.org/archive/thompson-ep/1978/outside-whale.htm

We cover Chapter Five, but first have an extensive discussion of the debate between Thompson and Perry Anderson and Tom Nairn over the history of social class and economic development in England, with sociologist Jonah Stuart-Brundage. What should we make of liberalism in England at the end of the eighteenth century and what it meant for the prospects of revolution? Secondary readings: Perry Anderson, “Origins of the Present Crisis” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I23/articles/perry-anderson-origins-of-the-present-crisis Perry Anderson, “Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism,” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I35/articles/perry-anderson-socialism-and-pseudo-empiricism Arno Mayer, The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War https://www.versobooks.com/books/475-the-persistence-of-the-old-regime Tom Nairn, “The British Political Elite” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I23/articles/tom-nairn-the-british-political-elite Tom Nairn, “The British Working Class” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I24/articles/tom-nairn-the-english-working-class Tom Nairn, “The Anatomy of the Labour Party: Part I” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I27/articles/tom-nairn-the-nature-of-the-labour-party-part-i Tom Nairn, “The Anatomy of the Labour Party: Part II” https://newleftreview.org/issues/I28/articles/tom-nairn-the-nature-of-the-labour-party-part-ii E.P. Thompson, “The Peculiarities of the English” https://www.marxists.org/archive/thompson-ep/1965/english.htm#n1

Welcome to Casualties of History, a podcast from Jacobin magazine. We’ll be working our way through EP Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class. In this first episode, Alex and Gabe introduce themselves and cover the book’s preface, as well as outline the context in which it was written. Who was Thompson, and what was he aiming to do in writing this book? Who was he arguing with, and why?Reference is made to secondary literature:Perry Anderson, “Origins of the Present Crisis,” New Left Review 1, no. 23 (Jan-Feb 1964).EP Thompson, “The Peculiarities of the English,” Socialist Register (1965). Thompson, “Time, Work Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” Past & Present no. 38 (Dec 1967).Frederick Cooper, “Work, class and empire: An African historian's retrospective on E. P. Thompson,” Social History 20, no. 2 (1995).Geoff Eley, A Crooked Line (University of Michigan, 2006).Madeleine Davis, “Reappraising British socialist humanism,” Journal of Political Ideologies 18, no. 1 (2013). Davis, “Edward Thompson's Ethics and Activism 1956–1963: Reflections on the Political Formation of The Making of the English Working Class,” Contemporary British History 28, no. 4 (2014).

This is Perry's story of how to survive and thrive today.

 Aquele em que eles analisam uma das principais barbáries nacionais, a perversa concentração de renda. A partir de dois relatórios elaborados pela ONG OXFAM em parceria com o DATAFALHA, respectivamente intitulados “País estagnado: um retrato das desigualdades brasileiras-2018” (disponível:https://www.oxfam.org.br/sites/default/files/arquivos/relatorio_desigualdade_2018_pais_estagnado_digital.pdf) e   “Nós e as desigualdades: percepções sobre a desigualdade no Brasil” (https://www.oxfam.org.br/sites/default/files/arquivos/relatorio_nos_e_as_desigualdades_datafolha_2019.pdf0), os quatro odiados, na verdade nesse episódio três, uma vez que o integrante Bruno Malavolta não pôde colaborar com o tempero literário pelo nobre motivo de seu doutoramento, debatem sobre como a desigualdade social historicamente vivida pelo brasileiro produz uma ambivalência desumana, em que 1% do estamento social mais rico do país vive como uma espécie de casta que desfruta privilégios, como acesso à educação de qualidade, saúde, lazer, segurança, parafraseando Engenheiros do Hawaii, sob os muros e as grades que os protegem de quase tudo, e nada lhes protege de uma vida sem sentido.   E diante dessa realidade sem sentido Cássio ressalta, com base na obra "Linhagens do Estado Absolutista" de Perry Anderson, que o Estado Moderno nasce garantindo o domínio da nobreza e da burguesia, (basta lembrar que só pobres pagaram impostos inicialmente) impondo seus interesses à dinâmica da vida em sociedade, vilipendiando os demais estratos sociais. Enquanto Moisés enfatiza dados perturbadores como a percepção de 49 % dos brasileiros que acham que a renda mínima para estar entre os 10% mais ricos é de 20.000 reais mensais, em contraposição com o dado que revela que apenas 1% dos brasileiros possuem renda entre 20 e 30 mil reais, revelando que a concentração de renda é mais absurda do que o cidadão brasileiro consegue perceber. Já Osvaldo traz para o debate uma espécie de “geografia da concentração de renda”, relembrando que em 2010 a Cidade de Goiânia figurou no cenário internacional entre as 10 cidades do mundo com maior concentração de renda.  Assim, nesse episódio os odiados transitam por temas como o avanço das religiões de matriz protestante, que em solo nacional engendram, através da teologia da prosperidade, a ideologia de que pela fé o indivíduo consegue ascender socialmente; passando pelo debate da escolarização/meritocracia, Cássio, Moisés e Osvaldo refletem sobre os 49% dos brasileiros que acreditam na falácia de que ter diploma é garantia de emprego; enfim, ouvindo todo o episódio você perceberá que o fio condutor que vai ligando os assuntos e seus debatedores é a possibilidade do exercício da cidadania em um cenário de profunda concentração de renda, que favorece a formação de uma ínfima casta endinheirada em contraposição a uma classe social miserável em condições de vulnerabilidade, parafraseando Racionais, em que o neguinho vê tudo do lado de fora.   Quer conferir como ficou? Dê um play e se enforque na corda da liberdade!    

How to get your energy and life back at any age using natural supplements that I've been using. Fast acting testosterone boost that helps your mood, energy and sex life.

Alla från vänster till höger kastar ordet "hegemoni" omkring sig. Men vad betyder det egentligen? Elin Grelsson Almestad gräver i H-ordets historia. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. Liberalernas trånga ensidiga hegemoni skapar mer problem än den löser, skriver socialistiska Internationalen medan Lars Anders Johansson, i  tankesmedjan Timbros nättidning Smedjan konstaterar att den svenska likhetskulturen syns i den  modernistiska hegemoni som varit rådande inom svensk arkitektur och stadsplanering sedan slutet av 1930-talet. I riksdagen råder en nyliberal hegemoni, förklarar Rättvisepartiet Socialisterna medan Mats Blomberg skriver i tidningen Fokus om hur borgarna 1976 lyckades bryta vänsterns hegemoni. Samtliga exempel är hämtade från ett par veckor i svenska medier. Hegemoni är ordet på allas läppar. Ja, i alla fall om man ser till hur det har spridit sig under de senaste decennierna från att främst ha hört hemma i universitetsmiljöer och akademiska diskussioner till att nu florera på allt från feministiskaworkshops till ledarsidor av alla politiska färger. En sökning i mediearkivet Retriever visar hur begreppet endast omnämndes ett fåtal gånger per år i dagspressen under 1990-talet för att sedan stadigt öka. Knappt ett par decennier in på tjugohundratalet förekom begreppet med marginal över 500 gånger per år i sportsammanhang, ledartexter och kulturanalyser. Det förekommer förstås också i publikationer som inte registreras i något mediearkiv, mer ljusskygga sajter som talar om etablissemangsmedias hegemoni. Ja, detta luddiga begrepp används av alla politiska läger och i skilda syften. Men vad betyder det egentligen? 2017 utkom historikern och sociologen Perry Anderson med boken The H-word som går till botten med hegemonins idéhistoria, utifrån en liknande iakttagelse kring begreppets utbredning. I snitt ges det ut en engelskspråkig titel i månaden med ordet hegemoni i. Anderson återvänder till begreppets ursprung grekiskans hegemonia som betyder ledning eller ledarskap. Härifrån kommer den geopolitiska betydelsen av hegemoni där en eller ett flertal svagare stater underkastar sig en starkare stat frivilligt, i syfte att erhålla internationellt erkännande, beskydd eller ekonomiskt bistånd. I Grekland var det Sparta och Aten som skapade sig hegemoniska särställningar där andra stater underkastade sig dem i utbyte mot beskydd. Aristoteles beskrev systemet som att de båda hegemoniska staterna i Grekland tog sin respektive styrandeform som standard och ålade dem på andra städer, i ett fall demokrati och i ett annat fall oligarki, fram tills att det hade blivit en fast vana hos befolkningen i resten av städerna att inte ens önska jämlikhet utan endast välja mellan att regera eller att uthärda underkastelsen. Ungefär så fungerar hegemoni, oavsett i vilket sammanhang den uppstår. Det verkar de flesta vara överens om. Hegemonin döljer med andra ord de politiska dimensionerna genom att få det att framstå som objektivt Efter Grekland och Aristoteles faller begreppet mer eller mindre i glömska fram till mitten av 1800-talet, då det återkommer i diskussioner och analyser kring Preussen och kejsardömets särställning innan det landar hos revolutionärerna i Ryssland. Här handlade det inte längre om relationen mellan stater, utan om relationen mellan klasser inom en och samma stat där Lenin använde sig av hegemoni som en fokuserad social strategi; att ena alla grupper som allierade under proletariatets diktatur, inte minst den stora majoriteten bönder. Det var också genom denna definition av hegemoni som den italienska kommunistledaren Antonio Gramsci kom i kontakt med begreppet under 1920-talet. 1926 dömdes Gramsci till 20 års fängelse av Mussolini-regimen och började under fängelsevistelsen att nedteckna sina tankar om samhället, totalt 29 anteckningsböcker där han bland annat utvecklade teorin kring kulturell hegemoni. Begreppet beskriver hur en styrande klass kan dominera genom kulturen i samhället dess vanor, beteenden, upplevelser och värderingar så att den styrande klassens sätt att leva och livsåskådning blir normerande och gör att det politiska, sociala och ekonomiska tillståndet i samhället framstår som naturligt och oundvikligt. Hegemonin döljer med andra ord de politiska dimensionerna genom att få det att framstå som objektivt. Det ska dröja till 1970-talet, långt efter Gramscis död, innan fängelseskrifterna trycks och sprids i både Italien och andra länder. Den kulturella hegemonin blir från och med då ett nyckelbegrepp för att beskriva nyliberalismen, borgerlighetens makt i samhället och hur kapitalismen närmast betraktas som en naturlag. Även inom genusvetenskapen plockas begreppet upp för att beskriva så kallad hegemonisk maskulinitet. De beteenden som den hegemoniska maskuliniteten innehar ses som naturliga, vanliga och positiva, men är också en idealbild som ingen kan leva upp till. Det närmaste män kan komma är delaktighet, det vill säga man delar den hegemoniska manlighetens ideal, även om man inte kan leva upp till den fullt ut. Genom att eftersträva hegemonin och på så vis stödja idealet, åtvinner männen de fördelar som den hegemoniska maskuliniteten tilldelas. I samband med #metoo aktualiserades den analysen, kring frågeställningar hur vissa beteenden kan ursäktas och till och med legitimeras.  Likaså återkommer begreppet i den återkommande frågan om en manlighet i kris. Vad sker med den enskilda mannen när hegemonin förändras från den starka, industriarbetande familjeförsörjaren till den emotionellt tillgängliga mannen vars partner tjänar mer? Vad händer med de män som känner sig vilsna och omsprungna, eftersom hegemonin kräver någonting annat av dem nu? Så vad talar vi egentligen om idag när vi talar om hegemoni? Den hegemoniska maskuliniteten, liksom den marxistiska kulturella hegemonin är bara några av de begrepp som ordet återkommer i. Hegemoni används också för att exempelvis att kritisera journalisters påstådda mörkning om invandringens effekter eller påvisa hur så kallad etablissemangsmedia vägrar berätta om chemtrails på himlen. Det är sannolikt en naturlig följd av ett samhälle som de senaste decennierna förvandlats till ett informations- och påverkanssamhälle, där alltfler röster vill göra sig hörda, liksom ett samhälle där tilltron till auktoriteter minskat och alla kan skapa sig sina egna sanningar. Hegemoni upprätthålls, enligt Gramsci, genom att de intellektuella på olika sätt företräder den styrande klassens intressen och förklarar sakernas tillstånd för undersåtarna på ett sådant sätt att de upplever de maktförhållanden som råder som självklara och därför självmant ger sitt samtycke till att låta sig styras. En formulering som idag lika gärna kunde vara hämtad från Flashback forum eller en antivaccinationssajt. Det finns ju i själva verket också något gott i att vissa hegemonier exempelvis hur vi talar om Förintelsen eller att vaccination gynnar både individ och folkhälsa faktiskt har etablerats. Samtidigt är andra hegemonier, som tron på evig utveckling på en jord med begränsade naturresurser, fortfarande starka fastän all forskning pekar på att vi är på väg mot en klimatkatastrof. Det finns med andra ord anledning att tro att såväl Aristoteles som Gramsci vänder sig i sina gravar när de ser hegemonibegreppets slängiga användning i alla former av svensk debatt, men det är ett symtom på tiden vi lever i. Makten är mer differentierad, rösterna är fler. Hegemoniordet är idag allas och samtidigt ingens alls. Elin Grelsson Almestad, författare och skribent   Litteratur Perry Anderson: The H-word. The Peripetetia of Hegemony. Verso, 2017. Raewyn Connell: Maskuliniteter. Översättning Åsa Lindén och Nils Sjödén. Daidalos, 2008. Antonio Gramsci: Selection From the Prison notebooks. Redaktör och översättare Qouintin Hoare och Geoffrey Nowell Smith. Lawrence and Wishart, 1971. Kristoffer Holt: Mediemisstro där ytterkanterna möts. Institutet för mediestudier, 2016. Dag Thorén: Mediakriget. Lunds universitet, 2015.

Each year over 300,000 people have a hip replaced. Perry Anderson, Vital60 podcaster, had his hip replaced 7 months ago and has deep insight in how to prepare for and how to recover from a hip replacement. This podcast includes Heather and Myles Weber, health and fitness professionals to discuss this topic to help those about to go through and recover from hip replacement surgery. We are at the Urijah Faber Ultimate Fitness Gym in Sacramento California. An amazing full service gym.

Many of us find ourselves in someone else's life not our own. We are not responsible to fix their life or problems. Even if we are in a relationship with them and love them. We can't fix anyone, but we can change the way we respond to them. Drama, chaos and ineffective patterns will not get you the life you really desire. Let others deal with their own life and their drama that has a life and energy of its own. Create your own life with the power and strength that is already inside of you. It may be hidden, but we all have our unique personal strengths that can power our lives in a new amazing way. The best way to help others is to be the example of how to live, love and grow into your new life. Life is too short to do it any other way. - Perry Anderson

"This is not my Circus, Those are not my monkeys"Many of us find ourselves in someone else's life not our own. We are not responsible to fix their life or problems. Even if we are in a relationship with them and love them. We can't fix anyone, but we can change the way we respond to them. Drama, chaos and ineffective patterns will not get you the life you really desire. Let others deal with their own life and their drama that has a life and energy of its own. Create your own life with the power and strength that is already inside of you. It may be hidden, but we all have our unique personal strengths that can power our lives in a new amazing way. The best way to help others is to be the example of how to live, love and grow into your new life. Life is too short to do it any other way. - Perry Anderson

Fala pessoal do GizCast! Voltando à normalidade aqui no Quem Foi?!, Gabriel Bonz (@_gabrielbonz) inicia aqui a série “O Contrato Social” dentro do QF?!. Nessa série, buscaremos desenvolver as teorias do contrato social colocadas dentro da história da filosofia política e iniciamos com um conceito fundamental pra entender a formação do Estado moderno: a concepção que o historiador marxista Perry Anderson (1938) tem desse momento de “passagem” da época feudal para a época moderna. Lembrando que qualquer dúvida, sugestão, indicação de convidado, é, não só bem vinda, como necessária. Para entrar em contato nos procure no Facebook, no Twitter ou no e-mail. Agradecemos a Yann Cerri (@yanncerri) pela arte da capa e à Sapiens Solutions pelo suporte ao podcast. Produção: Gabriel Bonz. Participação: Gabriel Bonz. Edição: Gabriel Bonz. Arte da Capa: Yann Cerri. Referência do início do programa: “Os senhores que permaneceram proprietários dos meios de produção fundamentais em qualquer sociedade pré-industrial eram, certamente, os nobres terratenentes. Durante toda a fase inicial da época moderna, a classe dominante – econômica e politicamente – era, portanto, a mesma da época medieval: a aristocracia feudal. Essa nobreza passou por profundas metamorfoses nos séculos que se seguiram ao fim da Idade Média: mas desde o princípio até o final da história do absolutismo nunca foi desalojada de seu domínio do poder político. As alterações nas formas de exploração feudal sobrevindas no final da época medieval estavam, naturalmente, longe de serem insignificantes. Na verdade, foram precisamente essas mudanças que modificaram as formas do Estado. Essencialmente, o absolutismo era apenas isto: um aparelho de dominação feudal recolocado e reforçado, destinado a sujeitar as massas camponesas à sua posição social tradicional.” (ANDERSON, Perry. Linhagens do Estado Absolutista. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2004, pp. 18). #GizCastAcessível: A capa tem uma foto em preto e branco do rosto de Perry Anderson, um homem sério que parece estar falando, e tem um óculos de armação grossa e preta. Está escrito em fonte Times New Roman maior “QUEM IX FOI?!” e, embaixo, “Estado Absolutista” para Perry Anderson. Ao redor da capa há uma simulação de moldura dourada. Apoie o projeto:  Curta no Facebook! Siga no Twitter! Siga-nos no Instagram!

Recorded at the Battle of Ideas 2016 In 2013, historian Perry Anderson observed that it is axiomatic for US foreign policy advisors that, ‘the hegemony of the United States continues to serve both the particular interests of the nation and the universal interests of humanity’. But troubled is the head that wears the crown of world domination. The US establishment is worried by the threat of domestic disorder, terrorist outrages and the rising powers in the East, notably China. It is also concerned by a range of social and economic problems: rising inequality, a failing school system, the burden of health care and obsolete infrastructure. Furthermore, ‘energy is wasted, R&D is insufficient, labour is under-skilled, finance is under-regulated, entitlements are out of control, the budget is in the red, the political system is overly polarised’. The current presidential election campaign confirms that elite confidence in US hegemony is not shared by substantial sections of the electorate. The rise of Donald Trump symbolises the scale of popular disaffection. According to Colombia historian Mark Mazower, his success – in parallel with populist politicians in Europe – confirms that ‘nationalism is back like it never went away’. Trump is riding ‘a populist insurgency’ seeking to restore the USA to its ‘rightful place in the world’. Trump appeals to widespread discontent over the impact of global economic forces, causing increasing inequality and insecurity, particularly in blue-collar communities. Trump’s nationalist revival has an angry and defensive tone. It stands in stark contrast to the vision of John Winthrop’s Puritan evangelicals who, sought to build in Massachusetts Bay a ‘city on a hill’, an ideal society in the New World as an example to the Old. As the late Benedict Anderson observed, the spirit of nationalism forged in the American Revolution, based on ‘an imagined political community’ of creole pioneers, provided a model for nationalist movements – first in Europe, and subsequently throughout the colonial world. But, whereas the nationalist spirit of the founding fathers had a unifying and democratic character, that of Trump, with its anti-immigrant, anti-Hispanic and anti-Muslim tropes, seems divisive and reactionary. Can America’s overwhelming military might continue to compensate for its chronic economic stagnation? Can the USA’s global cultural influence help it to hold off the competition of the rising powers of East Asia? Can any political alternative overcome the exhaustion and paralysis that appears to have overtaken the American system under the presidency of Barack Obama? speakers Professor Sarah Churchwell chair of Public Understanding of the Humanities; Professor of American literature, School of Advanced study, University of London Dolan Cummings associate fellow, Institute of Ideas; author, That Existential Leap: a crime story (forthcoming from Zero Books) Alex Deane managing director, FTI Consulting; Sky News regular; BBC Dateline London panellist; author Big Brother Watch: The state of civil liberties in modern Britain Michael Goldfarb journalist and historian, FRDH Podcast Dr Kwasi Kwarteng Conservative member of parliament for Spelthorne; historian; author, Ghosts of Empire and War & Gold Chair Dr Cheryl Hudson lecturer in American history, University of Liverpool

SMJ #16 – Pra que serve Direito Romano? Toda disciplina possui seu mito fundador, e como bom mito, é preciso que seja problematizado. A matemática tem Euclides, a física moderna tem Newton, a química Lavoisier, a história Heródoto, e o direito, por sua vez, foi recolher entre os romanos antigos a origem heroica de toda uma tradição. Mas será que o nosso direito contemporâneo tem alguma relação com o direito romano como muitos querem fazer crer? Afinal, porque se fala tanto de direito romano? O que uma tradição de mais de dois mil anos tem a nos ensinar hoje, com todos nossos problemas e questionamentos que nada lembram os de antigamente? Em uma expressão: pra que serve Direito Romano? Para compreender estas e outras questões relativas a história de Roma e do direito antigo, o Salvo Melhor Juízo trouxe para sua bancada dois especialistas no tema: Walter Guandalini Jr.* e João Paulo Arrosi**. Confira! ========= Indicado no programa: Livros: Paul Veyne, “O pão e o circo”; Paul Veyne, “Império Greco-Romano”; Paul Veyne, “História da vida privada” vol. 1, capítulo 1; Perry Anderson, “Passagens da antiguidade ao feudalismo”; Aldo Schiavone, “Uma história rompida”; Aldo Schiavone, “Ius”; Mario Bretone, “História do Direito Romano”; Série: ROMA (HBO) ========= Comentários, sugestões, críticas: contatosalvomelhorjuizo@gmail.com Twitter: @SMJPodcast Facebook: Salvo Melhor Juízo Instagram: @salvomelhorjuizo Assine o Feed: feeds.feedburner.com/salvomelhorjuizo Compartilhe, divulgue, ajude-nos nesse projeto! *Walter Guandalini Jr. é professor de direito romano da Universidade Federal do Paraná. Mestre e doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Paraná. Fez estudos de doutoramento sanduíche no Centro Studi per la Storia del Pensiero Giuridico moderno, da Università degli studi di Firenze. **João Paulo Arrosi é professor de direito romano, mestre e doutorando em direito pela Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Teaching, prayer, and thanks at the final meeting for Perry Anderson, an elder at BRCC. NOTE: This file contains a lot of material other than the teaching, which was part of the celebration of Perry's years of service as an elder in BRCC.

Perry Anderson teaches on the power and privilege of praying in Jesus name.

A look into the intimacy of prayer, by Perry Anderson. Also includes a recording of the taking of the Lord's Supper.