Podcasts about philippe aghion

C dans l'air l'invité du 2 septembre 2026 avec Xavier Jaravel, économiste, président du Conseil d'analyse économique. Il publie aujourd'hui "Les politiques économiques à l'épreuve des faits", aux éditions Odile Jacob, préfacé par Philippe Aghion. Xavier Jaravel fait partie, avec Jean-Luc Tavernier, Natacha Valla et Xavier Ragot, des quatre économistes chargés par le ministre des Comptes publics, David Amiel, d'un rapport sur la dégradation des comptes publics à l'horizon 2030. Rapport qui a sonné comme un avertissement pour le gouvernement, car il atteste d'une dérive. En cas de trajectoire "à politique inchangée", le déficit public passerait en effet de 5,9% dès l'an prochain, à 7% en 2030. La faute d'abord à la charge de la dette, plombée par la remontée des taux. Alors comment voter un budget dans ces conditions ? Et comment investir dans les domaines prioritaires, comme l'école ? C'est ce sur quoi Xavier Jaravel s'est penché dans son ouvrage, et dans une note du Conseil d'analyse économique, à paraître demain. « L'éducation est devenue l'un des premiers problèmes économiques de la France. », écrit-il, appelant à donner aux réformes éducatives "une place centrale dans l'agenda des réformes économiques". Réduction des effectifs en classe, formation des enseignants, lutte contre les inégalités...il nous livrera ses recommandations pour mieux réformer la scolarité.

"There's very few cases of more intelligent things being controlled by less intelligent things. Once they're a lot smarter than us, I don't think they'll put up with that." – Geoffrey HintonArtificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly developing and changing the world around us. In this special bonus episode we speak with Nobel Prize laureates to examine AI's growing influence on our society. From various disciplines and perspectives, they share their thoughts about AI's impact on the job market, medical research opportunities, existential threats and the need for government regulation. Discover more from the laureates featured in this episode and explore the discoveries and ideas behind their awarded work. At nobelprize.org, you'll find a wealth of content dedicated to each of our guests – Omar M. Yaghi, Mary E. Brunkow, Peter Howitt, Philippe Aghion, Joel Mokyr, Geoffrey Hinton and John Jumper – featuring interviews and descriptions of their prize-awarded work. You can also explore the 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, the 2025 prize in economic sciences, the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics and the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. This podcast was a production of Nobel Prize Outreach and Filt, and created in cooperation with Fundación Ramón Areces. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We are continuing our investigation into the implications of the Economic Singularity, the time when we need a new economic system because full automation by AI means that people can no longer obtain the resources they need by doing jobs.Our guest today is Ewan McMillan, the founder of New Gradient, an Edinburgh-based consultancy that builds AI systems for a variety of industries, from biotech to mining. He took a degree in theoretical physics at the University of Edinburgh, and since then he has spent seven years delivering applied AI R&D. We wanted to have Ewan on the show because he also writes about the economics of AI from the perspective of someone who is actually implementing it. This spring he posted a series of thought-provoking articles called “The Economics of AGI”.Selected follow-ups:New Gradient - Company websiteEwan McMillan - LinkedIn"The Economics of AGI" - Part 1  of Ewan's essay"The Innovation Paradox" - Part 2 of the essay"The Allocation Stack" - Part 3 of the essay"Bitter lesson" (general AIs will in due course out-perform specific AIs) - Wikipedia"AlphaZero" (covers the chess match vs. Stockfish) - Wikipedia"Smartphones and Beyond: Lessons from the remarkable rise and fall of Symbian" - book by David"Culture series" (about science fiction series written by Iain M Banks) - Wikipedia"Aghion–Howitt model"  - Wikipedia2025 Nobel Prize in Economics (recipients include Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt)"The First Solo Unicorns Are Here: Meet the One-Person Companies Racing to $1B in 2026" - Founder Institute"Understanding Alpha in Investing" - Investopedia"'We Must Act Now': Sixteen Nobel Laureates Join Leading Economists and AI Researchers in Call to Prepare for AI's Economic Transformation" - Stanford Digital Economy LabMusic: Spike Protein, by Koi Discovery, available under CC0 1.0 Public Domain Declaration

We are living during a period of economic growth, but that hasn't always been the case. Throughout history, even during eras of technological advancements – economic growth was not a given. The 2025 laureates in economic sciences – Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt – help us to understand how scientific innovations and creative destruction impact society. Join us for this timely conversation where we discuss technological changes and the potential threats they cause.For a quick intro to 2025's awarded work in economic sciences, check out our Crash Course on how to sustain economic growth or John Hassler's eloquent speech from the Nobel Prize award ceremony.Read complete profiles of Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt, and explore the 2025 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel at our website.See the announcement of the 2025 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel and the moment Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt were awarded their medals, all available on YouTube. This podcast was a production of Nobel Prize Outreach and Filt, and created in cooperation with Fundación Ramón Areces. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Peter Howitt won the 2025 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. The award was for the theory of sustained growth through creative destruction. He and Philippe Aghion gave that theory a mathematical form in 1992.Competition and innovation do not move together in a straight line. What decides the direction is where a firm sits relative to the technological frontier. Peter also draws the line between a merger that buys innovation and one that removes it, and he describes the route by which an incumbent turns market power into political power. We then turn to agent-based modeling. He is candid about why a method he still defends took thirty years to find readers.Follow me on X (https://x.com/profschrepel) and BlueSky (@ProfSchrepel).***References:"A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction" (with Aghion), Econometrica 60(2), March 1992, 323–351. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951599.Endogenous Growth Theory (with Aghion), MIT Press, 1998. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262528467/endogenous-growth-theory/"Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship" (with Aghion, Bloom, Blundell, Griffith), Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2), May 2005, 701–728. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/120/2/701/1933966."The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity" (with Aghion, Blundell, Griffith, Prantl), Review of Economics and Statistics 91(1), February 2009, 20–32. https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article/91/1/20/57753/The-Effects-of-Entry-on-Incumbent-Innovation-and."The Emergence of Economic Organization" (with Robert Clower), Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 41(1), January 2000, 55–84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268199000876."Banks, Market Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: An Agent-Based Computational Analysis" (with Ashraf and Gershman), JEBO 135, March 2017, 143–180. DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.023."How Inflation Affects Macroeconomic Performance: An Agent-Based Computational Investigation" (with Ashraf and Gershman), Macroeconomic Dynamics 20(2), March 2016, 558–581. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics/article/abs/how-inflation-affects-macroeconomic-performance-an-agentbased-computational-investigation/DC3AF3CA750F82FDE20164B36935FA1F."Getting at Systemic Risk via an Agent-Based Model of the Housing Market" (with Geanakoplos, Axtell, Farmer and others), American Economic Review 102(3), May 2012, 53–58. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.102.3.53.

Pour écouter l'épisode en entier, tapez "#555 - Philippe Aghion - Nobel d'économie - Redresser la France et l'Europe" sur votre plateforme d'écoute.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Récompenser l'innovation, c'est armer ceux qui la tueront.Philippe Aghion a passé sa carrière à modéliser cette contradiction qui lui a valu le prix Nobel d'économie 2025, partagé avec Joel Mokyr et Peter Howitt.Fils d'un couple juif arrivé en France en 1945, il grandit dans l'idéologie communiste de son père qu'il partage pendant toute sa jeunesse.Après un doctorat en économie à l'université de Harvard, il s'attaque à une question jamais vraiment résolue : d'où vient la croissance ?Le modèle dominant, de Robert Solow, l'expliquait par l'accumulation de capital et le progrès technique. Mais sans pouvoir définir l'origine du progrès technique, ce modèle restait incomplet aux yeux de tous.C'est ce trou qu'Aghion et Howitt tentent de combler à partir de la fin des années 80.Ils repartent du concept de destruction créatrice de Schumpeter pour prouver que la croissance vient de l'innovation cumulative. On innove pour faire des profits. Et chaque innovation rend la précédente obsolète.Mais ce modèle cache une contradiction.Pour pousser à l'innovation, il faut récompenser par des rentes. Sauf qu'une fois installés, les innovateurs d'hier utilisent ces rentes pour bloquer ceux de demain.Réguler une économie, c'est arbitrer ce conflit en permanence.Et c'est précisément à cette tâche que l'Europe a failli, selon lui.Il la décrit comme un géant réglementaire qui a tué sa propre politique industrielle et déplore la fuite de l'épargne des Européens vers les marchés américains.Dans cet échange, Philippe Aghion donne sa grille de lecture du monde :Son plan pour redresser les comptes de la France sans taxer davantage les richesPourquoi l'Europe a tant de mal à produire des licornes ? Et comment y remédier ?Le contrat d'évolution, son alternative au revenu universelComment l'IA accélère déjà la recherche, même au plus haut niveauPhilippe Aghion ne se décrit pas comme un optimiste, il considère que redresser la France et l'Europe est un « objectif de combat ». Et il livre dans cet épisode sa feuille de route pour y parvenir.Vous pouvez contacter Philippe sur LinkedIn.TIMELINE:00:00:00 - Les innovateurs d'hier bloquent ceux de demain00:10:59 - Vers un capitalisme social ?00:18:16 - Comment l'épargne européenne finance les licornes américaines00:25:33 - Son plan pour sauver les finances de la France00:31:16 - L'alternative de Philippe au revenu universel00:40:01 - L'Europe a réussi la paix mais raté la croissance00:45:51 - Le gaullisme 2.0 pour relever la France00:54:57 - "Ceux qui n'adoptent pas l'IA vont souffrir"Les anciens épisodes de GDIY mentionnés : #546 - Présidentielles 2027 - Édouard Philippe - Le courage politique et l'addiction française à la dépense publiqueNous avons parlé de :Inside Google's The GroveMichel DevoretFlexisécurité: le Danemark est-il un modèle?L'ENS Cachan devient l'ENS Paris-SaclayComment la Chine est devenue imbattable ?C'est quoi exactement la "taxe Zucman" ?Voici ce que devra faire en priorité le futur président de la République : les conseils de Philippe Aghion, Alexandra Roulet et Xavier JaravelLa Commission AttaliQuels sont les critères de Maastricht pour participer à l'UEM ?La mission French TechLes recommandations de lecture : Sapiens : Une brève histoire de l'humanité, de Yuval Noah HarariUn grand MERCI à nos sponsors : Squarespace : https://squarespace.com/doitQonto: https://qonto.com/r/2i7tk9 Brevo: brevo.com/doit eToro: https://bit.ly/3GTSh0k Payfit: payfit.com Club Med : clubmed.frCuure : https://cuure.com/product-onely (code DOIT)Vous pouvez retrouver la liste de tout le matériel utilisé pour enregistrer nos épisodes sur cette page.Vous souhaitez sponsoriser Génération Do It Yourself ou nous proposer un partenariat ?Contactez mon label Orso Media via ce formulaire.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Möt ekonomipristagaren Philippe Aghion om forskningen bakom ekonomipriset och hur nya idéer ersätter gamla och hur samhällen kan främja innovation. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Programmet sändes första gången i december 2025. Ekonomisk tillväxt är mer än siffror i BNP – den handlar om idéer som ersätter gamla strukturer och skapar nya möjligheter. Teorin om kreativ förstörelse beskriver hur innovation driver utveckling, men också varför konkurrenspolitik och starka institutioner är avgörande för att processen ska fungera.Forskningen bakom årets ekonomipris har förändrat synen på tillväxt och varför en helt avreglerad marknad riskerar att bromsa innovation. Här diskuteras också hotet från korruption, behovet av ett gemensamt europeiskt ekosystem för riskkapital och hur AI kan accelerera förändring – samtidigt som arbetsmarknaden ställs inför stora utmaningar.Frågan om grön tillväxt och tillväxt med kvalitet lyfts som en central framtidsfråga.Reporter: Knut Kainz Rognerudknut.rognerud@sr.seProducent: Lars Broströmlars.brostrom@sr.seTekniker: Nils Lundinnils.lundin@sr.se

Philippe Aghion, économiste et prix Nobel d'économie, était l'invité de l'émission Ecorama spéciale Rencontres économiques d'Aix-en-Provence, présentée par David Jacquot sur Boursorama.com. Parmi les sujets abordés : la situation des finances publiques françaises, la charge de la dette, les priorités d'investissement dans l'éducation, l'innovation et l'intelligence artificielle, la stratégie française et européenne face à l'IA, la compétitivité européenne, la mise en œuvre du rapport Draghi, la pression fiscale ainsi que les pistes pour redresser les comptes publics.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:20:13 - Le 6/9 de l'été - par : Benjamin Duhamel, Florence Paracuellos - Philippe Aghion, économiste, prix Nobel d'économie 2025, professeur au Collège de France et à l'INSEAD, insiste sur la nécessité de généraliser la climatisation des bâtiments en France pour faire face aux vagues de chaleur. - invités : Philippe Aghion économiste français, prix Nobel d'économie 2025, professeur au Collège de France et à la London School of Economics Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:20:13 - Les interviews d'Inter - par : Benjamin Duhamel, Florence Paracuellos - Philippe Aghion, économiste, prix Nobel d'économie 2025, professeur au Collège de France et à l'INSEAD, insiste sur la nécessité de généraliser la climatisation des bâtiments en France pour faire face aux vagues de chaleur. - invités : Philippe Aghion économiste français, prix Nobel d'économie 2025, professeur au Collège de France et à la London School of Economics Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

El "Revoluci

Real disposal income has grown in the United States much faster than in Europe since the beginning of the century. Does that mean European economies are falling behind? It's a debate some prominent economists are having lately, including Nobel winners Paul Krugman and Philippe Aghion. Adam and Cameron discuss. Also on the show: The economics of Morocco. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The standard story of American innovation features Silicon Valley, venture capital, and the heroic startup founder.When you trace the history of the internet, GPS, mass-produced penicillin, or the COVID vaccine, the starting point is not a term sheet but a government grant. How much does this matter,  and can we measure it?Tim Phillips speaks to Paolo Surico of London Business School and CEPR who, working with Andrea Gazzani, Joseba Martinez, and Filippo Natoli, has built the first systematic empirical account of how government-funded innovation has shaped US productivity since the Second World War. The headline result: government-funded patents account for roughly 2% of all patents filed in the post-war period, but explain around 20% of medium-term fluctuations in total factor productivity and GDP growth. The return on every dollar of public R&D is more than double the return on every dollar of private R&D. The key mechanism is not that government crowds out private investment; it crowds it in. For every dollar of public research, roughly another dollar of private investment follows, as talent from universities and research institutes moves into startups that commercialise what the public sector seeded. The logic is high-risk, high-reward: the government takes on the uncertainty and fixed costs that the private sector will not bear, accepting a large number of failures in order to find the breakthroughs that private capital would never have funded. The model is now under pressure: 2025 brought the largest cuts to US federal science funding in the post-war period. AI adds a further complication: for the first time, a general-purpose technology is being driven primarily by private capital, and that capital is now pulling the best scientific talent out of research institutes and universities and into industry. If that shift becomes permanent, the direction of innovation will be shaped by profitability rather than by broad productivity and living standards. The paper discussed in this episode:Gazzani, Andrea, Joseba Martinez, Filippo Natoli, and Paolo Surico. 2026. "The Public Origins of American Innovation." CEPR Discussion Paper DP20788. Centre for Economic Policy Research. [gated]To cite this episode:Phillips, Tim, and Paolo Surico. 2026. "The Public Origins of American Innovation." VoxTalks Economics (podcast/video).  Assign this as extra viewing. The citation above is formatted and ready for a reading list or VLE.About the guestPaolo Surico is Professor of Economics at London Business School and a Research Fellow of CEPR. [verify URL before publishing] His research focuses on macroeconomics, monetary policy, and the economics of innovation and growth. He has advised central banks and governments on macroeconomic policy and is one of the leading empirical macroeconomists working on the aggregate effects of technology and public investment.Research cited in this episodeScience: The Endless Frontier (Vannevar Bush, 1945) is the report commissioned by President Roosevelt as the Second World War was ending. Bush, Roosevelt's chief scientific advisor, was asked to distil what the wartime mobilisation of research had taught, and how it could be translated into a peacetime innovation ecosystem. The report identified three pillars: government, to set the direction of innovation by funding areas of strategic importance; research institutes and universities, to push the frontier of knowledge without the constraint of commercial goals; and the private sector, to transform new knowledge into new products. The framework became the organisational blueprint for post-war American science and, Surico argues, is the institutional foundation of American technological and economic leadership. The report is in the public domain and available online.The NIH and NSF are the two federal agencies whose funded innovations show the strongest subsequent links to productivity growth in the paper's results. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) funds health and biomedical research; the NSF (National Science Foundation) funds basic research across science and engineering. Both are predominantly funders of university and research-institute work — which is, Surico argues, precisely why their output generates larger productivity gains than defence-funded innovation. The result is not that health research is inherently more productive than defence research; it is that both the NIH and NSF fund more basic, frontier-pushing work, and that basic research generates the largest spillovers regardless of the department that pays for it.Crowding in versus crowding out is the central empirical question in the public R&D literature. Crowding out would mean that government spending on research displaces private spending that would have happened anyway, leaving total innovation roughly unchanged. Crowding in means the opposite: public research creates opportunities and trains talent that then attracts additional private investment. The paper finds consistent evidence of crowding in, particularly when government funds flow to universities and research institutes. For every dollar of public R&D, roughly another dollar of private investment follows, typically as researchers from publicly funded institutions move into startups to commercialise what they developed. This is why the aggregate return on public R&D is more than double the return on private R&D, even though government-funded patents are only two percent of the total.The Solyndra and Tesla parallel is used to illustrate why anecdote-based arguments about public R&D are unreliable. Solyndra — a solar energy company that received a US government loan guarantee and then failed spectacularly — is a frequently cited example of government waste in innovation funding. Tesla received a loan guarantee in the same round of funding and became one of the most valuable companies in history. Surico's broader point is that the government's logic for innovation investment is high-risk, high-reward: it should expect and accept a large number of failures, because the gains from the successes — when they are large enough — more than compensate for the losses. Evaluating public R&D by its failures misses this; evaluating it by its headline successes also misses it. Systematic analysis across the whole portfolio is required.Philippe Aghion's Nobel Prize lecture is cited by Surico on the relationship between innovation, competition, and market structure. Aghion, who shared the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2018, developed Schumpeterian growth theory — the idea that economic growth is driven by creative destruction, with new entrants displacing incumbents through innovation. The key implication Surico draws on is that incumbents have a structural incentive not to innovate disruptively, because doing so would destroy the market position they already hold. Startups, which have no existing position to protect, are the natural vehicle for disruptive innovation. This is why the paper finds that government-funded startups generate larger macroeconomic impacts than government-funded incumbents: startups have both the mandate from public funding and the commercial incentive to take market share.DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) is the US defence department's high-risk research arm, responsible for funding some of the most consequential technologies of the post-war era, including early internet infrastructure. Surico mentions a less celebrated DARPA project — an attempt to embed microchips into bags for tracking, before drone technology made the approach obsolete — as an example of a genuine failure. It illustrates the high failure rate that comes with high-risk public R&D, and the importance of evaluating the portfolio rather than individual projects.The Draghi report on European competitiveness is cited by Surico as a potential catalyst for a different model of European public investment in innovation. Europe's problem, in his analysis, is not the level of public spending but its composition: too much goes to procurement and too little to basic research and later-stage startup support. Europe has the talent, the research institutes, and the early-stage startups. What it consistently lacks is the capacity to fund the scaling-up phase, which causes European innovations and innovators to be commercialised in the United States. A reallocation of spending toward public R&D that acts as a venture catalyst for later-stage startups — analogous to what Vannevar Bush's framework did for the US after 1945 — is what Surico believes the Draghi report could enable, if acted on.

We end Season 10 with an intimate interview between the Nobel Prize winning economist Philippe Aghion and Will Hutton. They delve into the concept of "creative destruction," a term coined by economist Joseph Schumpeter, which highlights the dual nature of innovation in driving economic growth while simultaneously rendering older methods and certain industries and jobs obsolete. Aghion believes that for an economy to thrive creative destruction is key. They talk about certain countries such as Finland where creative destruction is allowed and supported to thrive by the Government. Aghion is Professor of Economics at the LSE. In the We Society podcast, join acclaimed journalist and Academy president Will Hutton, as he invites guests from the world of social science to explore the stories behind the news and hear their solutions to society's most pressing problems.Don't want to miss an episode? Follow the show on your favourite podcast platform and you can email us on wesociety@acss.org.uk and tell us who we should be speaking to. The We Society podcast is brought to you by the Academy of Social Sciences in association with the Nuffield Foundation and the Leverhulme Trust. Producer: Emily Uchida FinchAssistant Producer: Emily GilbertA Whistledown Production for the Academy of Social Sciences 

Ecoutez Le journal inattendu avec Martial You du 04 avril 2026.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:52:11 - Répliques - par : Alain Finkielkraut - Suspension de la réforme des retraites, dette sociale, rapport au travail : la France peut-elle encore se réformer sans renoncer à son modèle social ? - réalisation : Alexandra Malka - invités : Philippe Aghion économiste français, prix Nobel d'économie 2025, professeur au Collège de France et à la London School of Economics; Nicolas Dufourcq Directeur général de Bpifrance

Ecoutez Le journal inattendu avec Stéphane Boudsocq du 31 janvier 2026.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

(00:00:33) L'Europe a une opportunité unique de rebondir - Philippe Aghion, prix Nobel d'économie (00:06:50) Pourquoi Donald Trump embarrasse l'extrême-droite européenne ? (00:14:54) Pourquoi tout est plus cher en Hongrie ?

durée : 00:18:36 - L'Invité(e) des Matins - par : Guillaume Erner, Yoann Duval - La recherche peut-elle encore sauver le monde ? Face au défi climatique, aux pandémies et à la course à l'IA, nous recevons deux Prix Nobel qui ont transformé la science en solutions concrètes : Jules Hoffmann et Philippe Aghion. La France peut encore jouer, mais à quelles conditions ? - réalisation : Félicie Faugère - invités : Philippe Aghion économiste français, prix Nobel d'économie 2025, professeur au Collège de France et à la London School of Economics; Jules Hoffmann Biologiste, chercheur émérite au CNRS, prix Nobel de médecine 2011, co-directeur de l'Institut Sino-Français d'Immunologie Hoffmann

The recent disruption India's aviation sector due to IndiGo's crew shortage has thrown up questions about the concentration of powers in the hands of a few in the market across sectors. India's domestic aviation market is heavily concentrated. IndiGo and Air India together control close to 90 per cent of passenger traffic. Passengers were left without a backup when IndiGo faced a massive staff shortage, after the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) implemented new rest and duty norms for the crew.  This is not unique to aviation. Across India's economy, several sectors have quietly settled into duopolies. In telecom, Bharti Airtel and Reliance Jio dominate the market. Vodafone Idea and state-run BSNL struggle to stay competitive. In the digital economy, Amazon and Flipkart domiante the e-commerce sector, while, Uber and Ola lead ride-hailing. Zomato and Swiggy dominate food delivery sector. PhonePe and Google Pay command digital payments. Similar concentration exists in cement, steel, automobiles and other core industries. 2025 Nobel economic laurates Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt studied how companies invest in R&D to get patents to gain an advantage in the market. Their theory helps understanding how societies needs to support R&D to support economic growth. Power concentration is happens with innovation and the ability to raise investments. But concentration becomes a concern when it reduces consumer choice, weakens labour protections, or creates companies considered too big to fail. The IndiGo disruption has reignited that debate. As markets grow more concentrated, the key question remains — at what point should regulation step in to protect competition, workers and consumers? Guest: Rahul Singh, Associate Professor of Law, National Law School of India University Host: Nivedita V Edited and produced by Jude Weston Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

durée : 00:59:00 - Affaires étrangères - par : Christine Ockrent - Relation transatlantique fragilisée depuis le retour de Donald Trump au pouvoir, montée des populismes partout sur le vieux continent, sans compter des enjeux économiques et démographiques majeurs, et la guerre en Ukraine qui perdure... Quels défis l'Europe devra-t-elle relever en 2026 ? - réalisation : Luc-Jean Reynaud - invités : Philippe Aghion économiste français; Marc Lazar Professeur émérite à Sciences Po et professeur de « Relations franco-italiennes pour l'Europe » à l'Université Luiss de Rome

Möt ekonomipristagaren Philippe Aghion om forskningen bakom ekonomipriset och hur nya idéer ersätter gamla och hur samhällen kan främja innovation. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Ekonomisk tillväxt är mer än siffror i BNP – den handlar om idéer som ersätter gamla strukturer och skapar nya möjligheter. Teorin om kreativ förstörelse beskriver hur innovation driver utveckling, men också varför konkurrenspolitik och starka institutioner är avgörande för att processen ska fungera.Forskningen bakom årets ekonomipris har förändrat synen på tillväxt och varför en helt avreglerad marknad riskerar att bromsa innovation. Här diskuteras också hotet från korruption, behovet av ett gemensamt europeiskt ekosystem för riskkapital och hur AI kan accelerera förändring – samtidigt som arbetsmarknaden ställs inför stora utmaningar.Frågan om grön tillväxt och tillväxt med kvalitet lyfts som en central framtidsfråga.Reporter: Knut Kainz Rognerudknut.rognerud@sr.seProducent: Lars Broströmlars.brostrom@sr.seTekniker: Nils Lundinnils.lundin@sr.se

Dans cette deuxième édition des Grands entretiens d'Anne Rosencher, la directrice déléguée de la rédaction de L'Express reçoit un Nobel monté sur ressorts. Philippe Aghion, Prix Nobel d'économie 2025 est notre invité. L'occasion de parler d'innovation, du décrochage européen face à la Chine et aux Etats-Unis, mais aussi de la réforme des retraites et du Rassemblement national.Ces grands entretiens sont à écouter tous les quinze jours, sur toutes les plateformes de podcasts mais aussi disponibles en vidéo sur YouTube et Dailymotion. Réalisation audio : Jules KrotRéalisation vidéo : Renaud Toffier, Simon Barrau Montage vidéo : Loredane Binet Visuel : Alice Lagarde Photo : Matthieu Landry Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

C dans l'air spécial du 9 novembre 2025 - Dette : un scandale français ?Interview de Philippe Aghion, extraite du documentaire réalisé par réalisé Alain Pirot et Gaëlle Schwaller diffusé le dimanche 9 novembre 2025 sur France 5.Philippe Aghion, économiste, prix Nobel de l'économie 2025. Il a été conseillé économique auprès de françois Hollande et d'Emmanuel Macron.

C dans l'air spécial du 9 novembre 2025 - Dette : un scandale français ?Interview de Philippe Aghion, extraite du documentaire réalisé par réalisé Alain Pirot et Gaëlle Schwaller diffusé le dimanche 9 novembre 2025 sur France 5.Philippe Aghion, économiste, prix Nobel de l'économie 2025. Il a été conseillé économique auprès de françois Hollande et d'Emmanuel Macron.

durée : 00:39:19 - L'Invité(e) des Matins - par : Guillaume Erner, Yoann Duval - Philippe Aghion, prix Nobel 2025, raconte son parcours entre héritage artistique et engagement politique. Il plaide pour une croissance par l'innovation, la mise à plat des niches fiscales sans nuire à l'attractivité de la France, et une démocratisation de l'IA. - réalisation : Félicie Faugère - invités : Philippe Aghion économiste français

durée : 02:29:32 - Les Matins - par : Guillaume Erner, Yoann Duval - - réalisation : Félicie Faugère

"Capitalism, then, is by nature a form or method of economic change and not only never is but never can be stationary." - Austrian Economist Joseph Schumpeter (1950) The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics was recently awarded to Joel Mokyr, an economic historian at Northwestern University, Philippe Aghion, who is affiliated with universities in France and the U.K., and Peter Howitt, a professor of economics at Brown University. Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt worked together for decades to develop and publish a model that makes it possible to better understand business growth - but not just any growth. The growth fueled by Creative Destruction. Creative Destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942 in response to ideas from Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. In fact, Marx thought, and Schumpeter agreed, that it would lead to the end of capitalism… they just didn't agree on why. In this episode of the Art of Supply podcast, Kelly Barner covers: What Creative Destruction is, and why it is no ordinary form of growth How the idea is connected to the potential end of capitalism Why it is so fascinating that this idea is being highlighted at this moment in time, with the rise of AI right before us. Links: Kelly Barner on LinkedIn Art of Supply LinkedIn newsletter Art of Supply on AOP Subscribe to This Week in Procurement

We shouldn't fear progress. It brings countless benefits. Just think about how much easier it is to make plans with a friend today than 30 years ago—you can send a quick text and meet up in minutes, instead of calling a landline and hoping they're home to answer.Yet in the headlines, progress is often framed as a threat—from manufacturing jobs moving overseas to warnings that AI will cause mass layoffs. What's often forgotten is that new industries rise to take their place. New jobs emerge. Entrepreneurs adapt and create.This continual cycle of innovation and renewal—what economist Joseph Schumpeter called creative destruction—was recently spotlighted by the Nobel Prize in Economics awarded to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt for their work on sustained growth through innovation. For great analyses of the prize, check out Brian Albrecht's commentary and Justin Callais's deep dive. In today's episode of This Week's Economy, we'll explore creative destruction, how governments often try to protect us from it, and why it's best left to run its course. You can catch the full episode on YouTube, Apple Podcast, or Spotify.Visit: VanceGinn.comSubscribe: VanceGinn.Substack.com

Este año, el Premio Nobel de Economía ha sido otorgado a Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion y Peter Howitt. Según la Academia Sueca, los tres economistas han contribuido de forma decisiva a entender cómo la innovación impulsa el crecimiento económico.Nacho Conde-Ruiz, catedrático de Economía, nos explica qué aporta Joel Mokyr a nuestra comprensión del origen del crecimiento moderno. Su trabajo destaca el papel de la cultura, el conocimiento y las instituciones en el surgimiento de la economía contemporánea.La otra mitad del Nobel ha sido compartida por Philippe Aghion y Peter Howitt. Nacho nos ayuda a entender qué significa realmente el concepto de "destrucción creativa" y por qué sus modelos han sido tan influyentes. Ambos han demostrado cómo el progreso tecnológico reemplaza lo antiguo por lo nuevo, generando crecimiento a través de la innovación constante.Escuchar audio

Three people shared the Nobel Prize for economics this year—Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt—for their work on how innovation and creative destruction drive economic growth. Adam and Cameron discuss. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Nous commencerons notre section actualités en faisant le point sur les manifestations massives qui ont eu lieu samedi dernier aux États-Unis. Nous nous pencherons ensuite sur la situation en Europe. Pour la première fois en 35 ans, l'Allemagne a averti sa population que le risque qu'il y ait une guerre était de plus en plus élevé. Notre discussion scientifique portera sur le prix Nobel d'économie 2025, qui a été décerné à Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion et Peter Howitt pour leurs travaux sur la manière dont le progrès technologique et la destruction créatrice stimulent la croissance de manière durable. Enfin, nous parlerons du débat que le spectacle de la mi-temps du prochain Super Bowl a déclenché aux États-Unis . Il est lié à la représentation de la diversité ethnique et linguistique dans le sport et les divertissements américains.   Le reste de l'émission d'aujourd'hui sera consacré à la langue et à la culture françaises. Cette semaine, nous travaillerons sur les homographes et homophones. La leçon est: Homographs and Homophones with Different Genders. Nous parlerons de l'histoire des coquilles en typographie en voyant quelques exemples publiés dans la presse. Nous terminerons l'émission avec l'expression de la semaine, Ne pas y aller par quatre chemins. Nous évoquerons le « casse du siècle » qui s'est produit au musée du Louvre, lors duquel des bijoux inestimables ont été dérobés. Les musées français sont-ils suffisamment protégés ? - Des millions d'Américains participent aux rassemblements « No Kings » en faveur de la démocratie - Les autorités fédérales allemandes publient un guide qui prépare la population à affronter une guerre - Prix Nobel d'économie 2025 : un message d'avertissement sur les limites du progrès - Bad Bunny invite les fans de football américain à apprendre l'espagnol - L'histoire des coquilles, des erreurs parfois savoureuses - Le Louvre victime du « casse du siècle »

Iniziamo la nostra sezione di attualità con un approfondimento sulle imponenti manifestazioni di protesta che si sono svolte sabato scorso in diverse città degli Stati Uniti. Poi, ci sposteremo in Europa. Per la prima volta in 35 anni, la Germania ha lanciato un allarme sul crescente rischio di guerra. La nostra sezione scientifica è dedicata al Premio Nobel per l'Economia 2025, assegnato a Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion e Peter Howitt, per i loro studi sul ruolo del progresso tecnologico e della “distruzione creativa” nella crescita economica sostenibile. Infine, parleremo di un dibattito in corso negli Stati Uniti sul prossimo spettacolo dell'intervallo del Super Bowl. Al centro dell'attenzione c'è la rappresentanza culturale e linguistica nel mondo dello sport e dello spettacolo americano.   La seconda parte della puntata è dedicata alla lingua e alla cultura italiana. L'argomento grammaticale di oggi è Relative Pronouns che and cui. Ne troverete numerosi esempi nel dialogo che seguirà, ispirato alla recente notizia dell'avvio della coltivazione di banane in Sicilia. Coltivare una pianta tropicale in Italia, fino a poco tempo fa, sembrava fuori discussione. Oggi, invece, è realtà. Nel finale ci soffermeremo su l'espressione idiomatica di oggi: Conoscere il proprio pollo. Il dialogo in cui la useremo prende spunto dal progetto per la costruzione di un nuovo stadio di calcio sulle rive del celebre e romantico Lago di Como. Un'iniziativa ambiziosa, che però incontra la resistenza di alcuni residenti. - Milioni di persone in tutti gli Stati Uniti partecipano alle manifestazioni “No Kings” in difesa della democrazia - Le autorità federali tedesche emanano linee guida che mettono in guardia dalla possibilità di una guerra - Il Premio Nobel per l'Economia 2025 come monito sul concetto di progresso - Bad Bunny invita i tifosi di football americano a imparare lo spagnolo - Arrivano le banane Made in Sicily - Como: stadio da sogno o incubo urbano?

Comenzaremos el segmento de actualidad comentando las enormes manifestaciones que tuvieron lugar en todo Estados Unidos el pasado sábado. A continuación, centraremos nuestra atención en Europa. Por primera vez en los últimos 35 años, Alemania ha emitido una alerta sobre la creciente probabilidad de que haya guerra. El segmento de ciencia lo dedicaremos al Premio Nobel de Economía 2025, concedido a Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, y Peter Howitt por su trabajo sobre cómo el progreso tecnológico y la destrucción creativa posibilitan el crecimiento económico sostenido. Y, finalmente, hablaremos sobre el debate, en Estados Unidos, en torno al espectáculo del descanso durante la próxima Super Bowl. En particular, el debate se centra en cuestiones de representación y de idioma en los deportes y el mundo del entretenimiento estadounidenses. El resto del episodio de hoy lo dedicaremos a la lengua y la cultura españolas. La primera conversación incluirá ejemplos del tema de gramática de la semana, el verbo Gustar. En esta conversación hablaremos de una leyenda que encontramos en muchos lugares de España con distintas variantes. Hablamos de la Santa Compaña; una reunión de almas del Purgatorio que vagan noche tras noche. Pocos la pueden ver, pero esa visión, es su maldición. Y, en nuestra última conversación, aprenderemos a usar una nueva expresión española, Como pez en el agua. La usaremos para hablar de la apasionante vida que tuvo la actriz estadounidense Ava Gardner en la capital de España. En los años cincuenta, la estrella americana descubrió una España atrasada, pero alegre y divertida. Su amor por el cante flamenco, los toros y la fiesta era por todos bien conocido. Millones de personas acuden a las manifestaciones “No Kings” en todo Estados Unidos en apoyo a la democracia Las autoridades federales alemanas publican una guía que alerta sobre la posibilidad de que haya guerra El Premio Nobel de Economía 2025 es una alerta oportuna sobre el progreso Bad Bunny anima a los aficionados al fútbol americano a que aprendan español La Santa Compaña Ava Gardner, una mujer libre en la España de Franco

Wir beginnen mit einem Blick auf die Massenproteste, die letzten Samstag überall in den USA stattfanden. Danach sprechen wir über Europa. Zum ersten Mal seit 35 Jahren wird in Deutschland vor einem möglichen Krieg gewarnt. In unserem Wissenschaftssegment sprechen wir heute über die Vergabe des Nobelpreises für Wirtschaftswissenschaften 2025. Die Ökonomen Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion und Peter Howitt erhielten den Preis für ihre Arbeit daran, wie technologischer Fortschritt und schöpferische Zerstörung nachhaltiges Wirtschaftswachstum vorantreiben. Und zum Schluss sprechen wir über eine Debatte in den USA rund um die geplante Super-Bowl-Halbzeitshow. Dabei geht es insbesondere um Fragen der Repräsentation und Sprache im amerikanischen Sport- und Unterhaltungsbereich. Der Rest des Programms ist der deutschen Sprache und Kultur gewidmet. Die heutige Grammatiklektion konzentriert sich auf Da-Compounds / Da-Words Wir sprechen über die Fernsehsendung Bernd das Brot – ein Brot, das stets mürrisch, schlecht gelaunt und depressiv verstimmt ist. Die Figur ist dabei allerdings so komisch, dass sowohl Kinder als auch Erwachsene darüber lachen können. Bernd das Brot hat nun auch Fans in den USA. 2025 war ein wirklich turbulentes Jahr für das Oktoberfest auf der Theresienwiese in München. Hitzerekord, Bombendrohung, gefährliche Momente wegen Überfüllung: Das alles ging auf keine Kuhhaut. Genau das ist auch unsere Redewendung für diese Woche: Auf keine Kuhhaut gehen. „No Kings“-Proteste in den USA: Millionen Menschen demonstrieren für den Erhalt der Demokratie Deutsche Bundesbehörde warnt vor der Möglichkeit eines Krieges Wirtschaftsnobelpreis 2025 für Forschung zu technologischem Fortschritt und Wachstum Bad Bunny will, dass Football-Fans Spanisch lernen Bernd das Brot Ein Oktoberfest für die Geschichtsbücher

En este episodio de Peras y Manzanas, Valeria Moy invita a Raymundo Durán, economista, financiero y académico del MIT. ¿Por qué fueron galardonados Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion y Peter Howitt? ¿En qué se separan las ideas de los ganadores con la teoría de Joseph Schumpeter? ¿Cómo podemos relacionar el Premio Nobel con la situación de México? Discuten las aportaciones de cada economista y explican conceptos como la destrucción creativa.¡No te pierdas este episodio de Peras y Manzanas! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

What the former Finance Minister of Chile Andres Velasco has called the Deliveroo effect is most evident in Poland. Despite unprecedented economic growth and prosperity, Velasco explains, Poles remain miserable. The problem, he suggests, is that we've become so used to the magical efficiencies of the digital revolution, that we expect instant miracles in both our political and economic lives. That's one of the core issues Velasco, now Dean of Public Policy at the London School of Economics, and a group of leading public policy experts address in an intriguing collection of essays entitled The London Consensus. What the authors - who include Philippe Aghion, the 2025 Nobel Prize winner in economics - explore is how to come up with economic principles for the 21st Century that make us both happier and more prosperous, while confronting an existential challenge like climate change that didn't even register in last century's Washington Consensus. But democracy, Velasco warns, can't work like a delivery app. We've layered regulations and participatory processes that slow everything down—making it nearly impossible to build housing in California or infrastructure anywhere in the West—while personalized technology trains us to expect results immediately. This fundamental mismatch between our expectations and reality is fueling authoritarian populism, eroding trust in experts like Velasco, and Aghion, and leaving entire regions behind in a Deliveroo stew of economic failure and cultural resentment. 1. The “Deliveroo Effect” Is Breaking Democracy We've become so accustomed to instant digital gratification that we expect the same speed from politics and economics. But democracy requires deliberation, participation, and time—creating a dangerous mismatch between expectations and reality that fuels populism and dissatisfaction. Even prosperous countries like Poland, the second-fastest growing economy since 1990, remain bitterly divided.2. The Washington Consensus Got Politics Catastrophically Wrong The 1989 economic framework naively assumed you could “sort out the economics” and democracy would naturally follow. It ignored local ownership of policies and believed growth alone would create liberal democracies. China's experience—getting rich without democratizing—proved this assumption completely wrong. The London Consensus puts politics at the center.3. Markets Need States, Not “Free Markets” Versus Government The old ideological battle between markets and socialism was never productive. Markets can't function without capable states to enforce rules, regulate finance, and provide infrastructure. The real debate isn't whether to have government intervention, but what kind—finding the delicate balance between competition and regulation that fosters innovation without allowing excessive monopoly power.4. “Left-Behind Regions” Are Driving Political Upheaval Trade and technology create geographically concentrated losses—the Rust Belt, northern England—that go beyond economics. These regions experience social breakdown, population flight, and feelings of abandonment that translate directly into votes for demagogues and populists. Compensating losers from globalization wasn't just economically smart; it was politically essential.5. We Need a “Good Jobs Agenda,” Not Just Growth Following economists like Dani Rodrik and Daron Acemoglu, the London Consensus argues that policy should be evaluated through the lens of job quality, not just GDP growth. Technology isn't destiny—it can be directed toward complementing human skills rather than destroying jobs. Every policy, from trade to AI regulation, should ask: will this create quality jobs with decent pay, benefits, and worker agency?Keen On America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe

Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt have been awarded this year's Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.The three are sharing 11 million Swedish kronor, over a million dollars, after being recognised for their work in the area of “innovation-driven economic growth”. But why does this area matter and what did the three economists actually do? We turn the tables on our presenter Tim Harford, to explain all.If you've seen a number in the news you think we should take a look at, let us know: moreorless@bbc.co.ukPresenter: Lizzy McNeill Reporter: Tim Harford Series producer: Tom Colls Sound mix: Donald MacDonald Editor: Richard VadonImage credit: Johan Jarnestad / The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Uno de los premios Nobel de Economía de 2025, Philippe Aghion, ha estudiado el caso de Argentina para diagnosticar las causas históricas de su declive. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Joel Mokyr is a professor at Northwestern University, who — along with Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt — won the Nobel prize in economics earlier this week. Today, Mokyr joins the program to discuss how major technological changes can boost economic growth — that is, if politics and institutions can adapt quickly enough. Plus, why the bankruptcies of First Brands and Tricolor Holdings are raising questions about private credit markets and big banks' exposure to them.

Joel Mokyr is a professor at Northwestern University, who — along with Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt — won the Nobel prize in economics earlier this week. Today, Mokyr joins the program to discuss how major technological changes can boost economic growth — that is, if politics and institutions can adapt quickly enough. Plus, why the bankruptcies of First Brands and Tricolor Holdings are raising questions about private credit markets and big banks' exposure to them.

Ecoutez L'angle éco de François Lenglet du 14 octobre 2025.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Mardi 14 octobre, François Sorel a reçu Frédéric Simottel, journaliste BFM Business, Enguérand Renault, consultant chez Image 7 et ancien journaliste au Figaro, et Michel Lévy-Provençal, prospectiviste, fondateur de TEDxParis et de l'agence Brightness. Ils se sont penchés sur le parcours de Philippe Aghion, le Nobel de l'économie, la fin des mises à jour de Windows 10 à partir d'aujourd'hui,la révélation d'un casque militaire développé par Anduril et Meta, ainsi que l'offre de Bouygues, Free et Orange pour le rachat de SFR, dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez-la en podcast.

“Peter, Peter, make yourself available, your phone, they're trying to reach you!” Listen to Philippe Aghion telling Peter Howitt that the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has been attempting to call him, captured as part of this call made shortly after the public announcement of their joint 2025 economic sciences prize. In this conversation with the Nobel Prize's Adam Smith he also reveals his joy and surprise at the news, discusses the implications of their ‘creative destruction' model of sustained economic growth, and suggests paths to ensuring that the fruits of growth can be more widely shared. © Nobel Prize Outreach. First reactions terms of use: https://www.nobelprize.org/ceremonies/streams-terms-of-use Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

“I'm not one of these people who keeps the phone on, and the champagne in the fridge.” Peter Howitt certainly didn't seem to be expecting the news of his 2025 prize in economic sciences. In this call recorded just after the announcement, he talks to the Nobel Prize's Adam Smith about his longstanding friendship with fellow-laureate Philippe Aghion and how they started their collaboration in the conducive environment of MIT. “My future,” he concludes, “is going to involve more economics, and less golf, than I had anticipated!” © Nobel Prize Outreach. First reactions terms of use: https://www.nobelprize.org/ceremonies/streams-terms-of-use Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

durée : 00:31:39 - Entendez-vous l'éco ? - par : Aliette Hovine - Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion et Peter Howitt sont les lauréats du prix Nobel d'économie 2025, annoncé ce lundi 13 octobre 2025, pour leurs travaux sur la croissance et l'innovation. Comment expliquer cette récompense ? Que dit-elle de l'état de la recherche en économie ? - réalisation : Sorj Leroy - invités : Béatrice Cherrier Historienne de l'économie, directrice de recherche au CREST et à l'Ecole Polytechnique; Guillaume Vallet Professeur en sciences économiques à l'Université Grenoble Alpes; Céline Antonin Economiste senior à l'OFCE; Sylvie Rivot Professeur des université à l'Université de Haute-Alsace (Mulhouse) et membre du laboratoire de recherche BETA à Strasbourg

Stephen Grootes speaks to Boxer CEO, Marek Masojada about the retailer’s robust financial performance, marked by a 13.9% rise in turnover to R22.5 billion, strong trading profit growth, and strategic expansion — all driven by operational efficiency, customer loyalty, and a relentless focus on delivering value. In other interviews, Prof Adrian Saville, Professor of Economics and Finance at GIBS, talks about the 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics, awarded to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt for their groundbreaking research on how innovation and “creative destruction” fuel economic growth. Their work shows how new technologies replace the old, boosting living standards, health, and quality of life around the world. The Money Show is a podcast hosted by well-known journalist and radio presenter, Stephen Grootes. He explores the latest economic trends, business developments, investment opportunities, and personal finance strategies. Each episode features engaging conversations with top newsmakers, industry experts, financial advisors, entrepreneurs, and politicians, offering you thought-provoking insights to navigate the ever-changing financial landscape. Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Money Show Listen live Primedia+ weekdays from 18:00 and 20:00 (SA Time) to The Money Show with Stephen Grootes broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show, go to https://buff.ly/7QpH0jY or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/PlhvUVe Subscribe to The Money Show Daily Newsletter and the Weekly Business Wrap here https://buff.ly/v5mfetc The Money Show is brought to you by Absa Follow us on social media 702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/Radio702 CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nobel de Economía 2025 a Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion y Peter Howitt por sus contribuciones en la investigación del crecimiento económico moderno. ¿Cuáles son sus principales aportaciones? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Anu Bradford, Professor at Columbia Law School, and Kate Klonick, Senior Editor at Lawfare and Associate Professor at St. John's University School of Law, join Kevin Frazier, AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the University of Texas School of Law and a Senior Editor at Lawfare, to assess the ongoing, contrasting, and, at times, conflicting regulatory approaches to Big Tech being pursued by the EU and U.S. The trio start with an assessment of the EU's use of the Brussels Effect, coined by Anu, to shape AI development. Next, they explore the U.S.'s increasingly interventionist industrial policy with respect to key sectors, especially tech.Read more:Anu's op-ed in The New York Times"The Impact of Regulation on Innovation," by Philippe Aghion, Antonin Bergeaud, and John Van ReenenDraghi Report on the Future of European CompetitivenessFind Scaling Laws on the Lawfare website, and subscribe to never miss an episode.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.