Podcasts about Beber

En el episodio de hoy abordaremos un tema que muchos prefieren negar: ¿cuándo una “cervecita” deja de ser convivencia y se convierte en una adicción?, acompañaremos a Omar Villarreal, especialista en adicciones, para descubrir las señales que pueden revelar un problema con el alcohol, desde la tolerancia y la pérdida de control hasta los conflictos familiares, económicos y emocionales. Pero la historia no termina ahí, Julián, quien pasó más de 15 años atrapado en el alcohol, cuenta cómo comenzó, hasta dónde llegó y qué ocurrió cuando finalmente decidió rehabilitarse. Una conversación directa, incómoda y reveladora que pondrá en jaque la famosa frase: “Yo lo dejo cuando quiera”. 

Mensagem do dia 02 de Agosto de 2026 por Ed René Kivitz Comer a carne e beber o sangue |Joao 6. 51-64 Celebração Ibab AO VIVO 11h www.ibab.com.br Nos acompanhe nas redes sociais www.instagram.com/oficialibab www.facebook.com/oficialibab www.twitter.com/oficialibab

Na pausa de agosto do Posto Emissor, recordamos algumas das edições mais ouvidas ao longo do ano. Em fevereiro, prestes a celebrar 25 anos de carreira com um concerto no Coliseu de Lisboa, a dupla dos irmãos Nélson e Sérgio Rosado falou no podcast da BLITZ sobre as viagens pelo mundo, a paternidade, episódios de ‘stalking’ e, inevitavelmente, o processo que os opôs a Joana Marques.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Manter o corpo hidratado é uma das principais práticas para a saúde e o bem-estar. Beber água vai muito além de sentir sede, já que ela é essencial para o funcionamento do organismo.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Desde siempre ha existido el alcohol... Desde siempre la biblia lo mencionó. Siempre hemos estado bajo sus hechizos y sus beneficios.

"Vamos beber os Brasis?"É a provocação central da zine Na Língua, lançada pela BeberÚ. Neste episódio do Surra de Lúpulo, Ludmyla Almeida recebe Bia Amorim e Aline Smanioto para falar sobre essa publicação que propõe novos olhares para as bebidas brasileiras, a memória alimentar, o território e a construção do gosto.A conversa passa pela criação da Sommelieria Pindorama, pela importância de ampliar os repertórios da formação em bebidas e pelo desafio de pensar a cerveja brasileira para além das referências europeias. Mas o papo vai ainda mais fundo: ancestralidade, fermentação, brasilidade, botecos, ingredientes locais, saberes invisibilizados e o risco de transformar cultura em marketing raso também entram no copo.Dê o play e venha com a gente nessa conversa sobre sabor, identidade e os muitos Brasis que ainda precisamos aprender a beber.

study the present tense conjugation of the verb 'beber'.

¿Es cierto que si a una vaca se le aplica procelo sin saber que está preñada, será que aborta? ¿Qué es bueno para eliminar los barros en la cara? ¿Cuál es la historia de Tropas Especiales del Cuartel 23 que creaban ilusiones ópticas y sonoras para engañar a los alemanes en la Segunda Guerra Mundial? ¿Por qué en algunas comunidades religiosas se desarrolla la idea de que solo quienes pertenecen a ese grupo están “salvos”, mientras que los demás no lo están? ¿Beber leche de cabra trae beneficios para salud? ¿A qué edad deja de crecer una persona?

Este elect está basado en la historia antigua del Intelectual y el pozo datada en Roma en el siglo IV espero la disfruten jejeConviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/chistes-y-mas-con-julio-y-el-marciano--3287516/support.

Volver a escandalizarnos con las palabras de Jesús: nos invita a comer carne y beber sangre… suyas. No se conformó con dejarnos sus palabras ni con morir en la Cruz, quiso realizar una unión que no corriera el riesgo de ser extrínseca, y nos hace posible la fusión. Él me da su Cuerpo y yo lo recibo en mí; yo le doy el mío y Él me transforma en Sí.

Meditación del día 25 de julio de 2026 Palabra de Vida

“Beberán mi cáliz.”Del santo Evangelio según san Mateo: 20, 20-28.Lectura y reflexión: Pbro. Hediberto García Gómez.En aquel tiempo, se acercó a Jesús la madre de los hijos de Zebedeo, junto con ellos, y se postró para hacerle una petición. Él le preguntó: «¿Qué deseas?» Ella respondió: «Concédeme que estos dos hijos míos se sienten, uno a tu derecha y el otro a tu izquierda, en tu Reino». Pero Jesús replicó: «No saben ustedes lo que piden. ¿Podrán beber el cáliz que yo he de beber?» Ellos contestaron: «Sí podemos». Y él les dijo: «Beberán mi cáliz; pero eso de sentarse a mi derecha o a mi izquierda no me toca a mí concederlo; es para quien mi Padre lo tiene reservado».Al oír aquello, los otros diez discípulos se indignaron contra los dos hermanos. Pero Jesús los llamó y les dijo: «Ya saben que los jefes de los pueblos los tiranizan y que los grandes los oprimen. Que no sea así entre ustedes. El que quiera ser grande entre ustedes, que sea el que los sirva, y el que quiera ser primero, que sea su esclavo; así como el Hijo del hombre no ha venido a ser servido, sino a servir y a dar la vida por la redención de todos».Palabra del Señor.Gloria a ti, Señor Jesús.

+ Del Evangelio según San Mateo +Entonces se acercó a Jesús la madre de los hijos de Zebedeo, junto con ellos, y se postró para hacerle una petición. Él le preguntó: "¿Qué deseas?". Ella respondió: "Concédeme que estos dos hijos míos se sienten, uno a tu derecha y el otro a tu izquierda, en tu Reino". Pero Jesús replicó: "No saben ustedes lo que piden. ¿Podrán beber el cáliz que yo he de beber?". Ellos contestaron: "Sí podemos". Y Él les dijo: "Beberán el cáliz; pero eso de sentarse a mi derecha o a mi izquierda no me toca a mí concederlo; es para quien mi Padre lo tiene reservado".Al oír aquello, los otros diez discípulos se indignaron contra los dos hermanos. Pero Jesús los llamó y les dijo: "Ya saben que los jefes de los pueblos los tiranizan y que los grandes los oprimen. Que no sea así entre ustedes. El que quiera ser grande entre ustedes, que sea el que los sirva, y el que quiera ser primero, que sea su esclavo; así como el Hijo del hombre no ha venido a ser servido, sino a servir y a dar la vida por la redención de todos".Palabra del Señor.

En aquel tiempo, se acercó a Jesús la madre de los hijos de Zebedeo, junto con ellos, y se postró para hacerle una petición. Él le preguntó: "¿Qué deseas?" Ella respondió: "Concédeme que estos dos hijos míos se sienten, uno a tu derecha y el otro a tu izquierda, en tu Reino". Pero Jesús replicó: "No saben ustedes lo que piden. ¿Podrán beber el cáliz que yo he de beber?" Ellos contestaron: "Sí podemos". Y él les dijo: "Beberán mi cáliz; pero eso de sentarse a mi derecha o a mi izquierda no me toca a mí concederlo; es para quien mi Padre lo tiene reservado".Al oír aquello, los otros diez discípulos se indignaron contra los dos hermanos. Pero Jesús los llamó y les dijo: "Ya saben que los jefes de los pueblos los tiranizan y que los grandes los oprimen. Que no sea así entre ustedes. El que quiera ser grande entre ustedes, que sea el que los sirva, y el que quiera ser primero, que sea su esclavo; así como el Hijo del hombre no ha venido a ser servido, sino a servir y a dar la vida por la redención de todos".Mateo 20,20-28

  Episode: 140 RAISING PPA assessment and treatment from the Ground Up: In Conversation with Jeanne Gallée     In this episode you will discover: · Assessment and Intervention Aren't Separate — Conversation itself can double as both. By listening closely and responding to what a client offers, in a "more art than science" way, clinicians gather meaningful data and provide support at the same time, rather than treating these as two distinct phases of care. · Rigid Testing Can Erase the Person Behind the Diagnosis — Traditional standardized assessments often serve the goals of an institution or research protocol more than the person being assessed. Frameworks like RAISE and the PACT scale shift the focus toward strengths, natural conversation, and what someone can still do, rather than repeatedly measuring decline. · PPA Needs Its Own Identity and Training Path — Because primary progressive aphasia sits uneasily between post-stroke aphasia care and traditional dementia care, clinicians often receive little formal training in it. A global survey found major gaps in education and confidence, underscoring the need for dedicated resources, like Dr. Gallée's PPA roadmap, built specifically for this population. Do you ever wish you could step back in time and undo the missteps and errors of the past? What if you had the opportunity to build something from the ground up? Certainly, knowing what you know now, you could begin in a better place. But of course, there's always pitfalls with new beginnings, even with the knowledge of lessons from the past. You could, however, make a positive impact on that new beginning. Welcome to the Aphasia Access Conversations podcast. I'm Jerry Hoepner, a professor from the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire, and co-facilitator of the Chippewa Valley Aphasia Camp, Blue Gold Brain Injury Group, Mayo Brain Injury Group, Young Persons Brain Injury Group, Brain In-Cog, and Thursday Night Poets. I'm also a member of the Aphasia Access Podcast Working Group. Aphasia Access strives to provide members with information, inspiration, and ideas about their aphasia care through a variety of educational resources. I'm privileged to introduce today's guest, Dr. Jeanne Gallée, who is a clinical scientist in the Department of Medicine at the University of Washington. Dr. Gallée is a licensed speech language pathologist practicing in the greater Washington state area. She completed her Bachelor of Arts in Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences at Wellesley College in 2016 and Doctor of Philosophy at Harvard University in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology in 2021. She has been recognized as a Distinguished Early Career Professional by ASHA and a Distinguished Scholar by the Tavistock Trust for Aphasia. Her work is dedicated to improving assessment practices and functional outcomes for individuals living with aphasia and neurodegenerative conditions. Jerry Hoepner: Jeanne, it's really nice to see you again today, and to have this opportunity to have a conversation with you as a recent recipient of the Tavistock Scholar Program, and to talk about your work with individuals with primary progressive aphasia. So, thanks for being "on" today for the conversation. Jeanne Gallée: Thank you so much for having me, Jerry. I'm really honored to be here. Jerry Hoepner: Likewise, I'm really excited for this conversation, and as I just alluded to, I wanted to congratulate you on being awarded the first Tavistock Scholar with an emphasis doing work in primary progressive aphasia, and I thought maybe I could get your thoughts on being selected as a Tavistock Scholar. Jeanne Gallée: Thank you. It feels honestly incredibly remarkable in the sense that I think it represents a shift in how we're thinking about the separate diagnoses of progressive aphasia versus an aphasia that's due to an acute injury. And I'm really honored to be a part of that. I think there have been many discussions growing over the years, and I think we're seeing that shift in how we do think about addressing assessment and intervention and general care for people across the aphasia continuum. Jerry Hoepner: Agreed, I think there's been so much growth in the last five years in that area. I can remember at the outset of the pandemic, having discussions about "What do we do with people with primary progressive aphasia who were a part of our aphasia group? Should they be a part of our aphasia group? How do we pivot to that in an online context?" and it feels like we've come so far in our conversation about where primary progressive aphasia fits in in all of those different contexts. Jeanne Gallée: Right, I entirely agree, and I think the journey of my own work has already evolved in so many ways that I couldn't have imagined, like you say, five years ago I completed my doctoral work March 2021 and just seeing the phenomenal amounts of change that have really taken place since then has been incredible, and I feel very lucky to be part of that momentum right now. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, it's exciting to see these things move forward. And one of the differences that I see is primary progressive aphasia started out within the Life Participation Approach, just soundly from day one, as opposed to a lot of aphasia care, which has kind of evolved from this medical model, and how refreshing it is to see something built from the ground up. Done right, so to speak. I don't know if you have thoughts on that piece… Jeanne Gallée: No, I do. I think that's a really interesting point. I think I might be part of the camp that at times feels like progressive conditions get a little bit lost in the rehabilitation space, but I think you're absolutely right. I think the absence of pharmacological treatment, or a cure that has long standing effects for these progressive conditions has made rehabilitation specialists much more attuned to focusing on quality of life, life participation, maintaining autonomy, and so forth. So, I think I forget that perspective sometimes. Perhaps from the space that I work in, I tend to be in a more interdisciplinary environment where I feel on the opposite end. I'm often asked for justification for providing these types of services, and that fits in nicely with our previous discussion on how we do see that differentiation and how people with aphasia due to a progressive condition may be siloed from people who have the more quote unquote traditional aphasia symptoms. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, that's a really good point. And you know, referring to those previous conversations we discussed that need for primary progressive aphasia to have a space of its own. It's tricky because it doesn't fit into post-stroke aphasia quite right, and it doesn't fit into the Alzheimer's and dementia world quite right. So, yeah, it's nice to see this developing in the Life Participation kind of context, really excited about Anna Volkmer's conference dedicated to primary progressive aphasia. Yeah, what an excellent point, that even though we feel like it's great to build it from the ground up, there's still people in that interdisciplinary context, who are very much looking at this, like,"Justify this. How is having conversations and doing activities with someone justifiable, as a, you know, as a skilled intervention?" Jeanne Gallée: Right. I think a lot of it comes back to misunderstandings about the scope of our profession. So, coming from the speech language pathology standpoint, we may have a perspective that other providers may not. And it's interesting, particularly when that confusion or disconnect happens in conditions that are communication led, where we see the symptoms primarily touching upon our ability to interact verbally or non-verbally to communicate. And it's fascinating, and I think speaking to that silo, we see PPA having been a relatively new and still considered very rare condition, but there's so much overlap with other conditions, right, in the kinds of symptoms that we see and there's so much where, as any speech pathologist with experience in acquired neurogenic communication disorders, we can see that we can apply our skill set, but again, likely due to the terminal nature of the condition, we end up seeing providers taking it a different route, or saying either there's only the pharmacological route, or we just let it lie or let it be as is, which we wouldn't do with any other condition. We wouldn't say that for someone with ALS. We would want to provide them the supports, even if they're temporary, to improve quality of life. So, it is an interesting, almost cultural phenomenon as well. I think. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, that I think it's really fascinating, and I'm so glad you brought that up. It reminds me of kind of the phrase, the company we keep, right? It's easy to be amongst, you know, people who are in the [Life Participation Approach to Aphasia] LPPA world, who think the way that we think, and who do the way that we do. And I do a lot of work in the area of cognitive communication disorders with acquired brain injuries, and so forth, and there's been a remarkable shift in the last five years there as well towards a more Life Participation bio psychosocial approach, and some of the work that I've been passionate about for years has been more and more accepted. So you feel like when you're in that company of all of your people that everything's all good, but it also reminds me of something that my friend Natalie Douglas always says, which is that "We need to be out there amongst others who need to understand the importance of this kind of a perspective, and sharing that." And when you talked about those other professionals, I really didn't think about that until you said that. Right, really important to get them on the same page, and to help them understand why this is so important. Jeanne Gallée: Right? And I think that's where the conference that you mentioned, the first PPA only conference that's taking place this summer in London, is so special because one of the reasons why we were so motivated to have this type of a conference is that there wasn't really the space at the typical aphasiology conferences, and then the larger neurology-based conferences, or more broadly dementia-based conferences, also didn't quite feel like a home. I think, especially their studies of quality of life, in particular, we're really not seen as rigorous in those contexts. So, this conference, what's nice is that we have that uniting force of everyone being focused on PPA, but it's super interdisciplinary, and that I think will really promote some fantastic conversations. Jerry Hoepner: Wow, that's really encouraging and exciting to see that move forward. I'm not in the primary progressive aphasia world, although when we're at aphasia camp and things like that, certainly that's a part of my role. But as soon as I saw the call for papers come out, I'm, you know, texting and messaging all of my PPA folks to say, "Did you see this? This is great. Are you doing something?" It's very exciting. So, I'm excited to see where that moves in the future and to hear how things go this time around. That's great. Jeanne Gallée: Likewise, I'm really excited, and I do really believe it will lead to a whole future cascade of collaboration. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, amazing. Well, before we delve into your amazing work, I've been reading your articles, and it's been just a pleasure to read it. I'm always impressed with how certain themes of importance can come across in different areas of our field, and it's been fun to see that. I wonder, because I'm looking at the list of collaborators, just some incredible collaborators on that list, in those papers, I'd love to hear a little bit about your mentorship, both in primary progressive aphasia and kind of thinking about the Life Participation quality of life kind of context as well. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, I think in hindsight my mentorship experience seems more linear than it did in the moment. And I think it goes back to my original journey in my doctoral program. The program I was in, the Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology program at Harvard was a little bit different from others, where we didn't apply to work with a specific mentor, but truly just to get into the program. And they encouraged a pretty extensive shopping period to work with a variety of mentors to get a feel for topic area, mentorship style, and so traditionally first year students didn't even have any experiences, they just focused on the very time-intensive and rigorous coursework. I came in and started my first experience with Evelina Fedorenko at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who had worked with an undergrad. And that I think from the get-go gave me a very holistic view. I think, of the ways in which we could think about language, and in particular, the language network. So, there I was working on MRI studies of what activations do we see in the language network. In response to linguistic stimuli. And we were working with undergrads at MIT who were all healthy between the ages of 18 through 30, and I just felt at a certain point that I had this growing interest towards thinking about what happens when something goes wrong. So when it's atypical processing of language. I first thought I might be interested in pediatric population, so I was all over the place, but through the partnership that my program had with the MGH Institute of Health Professionals, I ended up having this amazing opportunity to be mentored by Evelina Federenko, as well as Sophia Vallila Rohter at the Institute of Health Professions, as well as the Frontotemporal Disorders Unit at Mass General Hospital, through my actual clinical training. So I had this quite hefty consortium of mentors, and I think that has its own set of challenges, right? It's a little bit less mentor-directed and more on the student to say, "This is exactly what I want to work on." But I think that allowed me to build a network of experiences and mentors, and that just has bled into every experience I've had since then. I also think the pandemic, you brought that up before, had a huge role in this, and all of a sudden people were very, very open to virtual meetings and connections and wanted connection. I think everyone felt very stuck at home and wanted to find more people and to find meaning and Anna Volkmer and I had the opportunity to meet at the Academy of Aphasia in Macau in 2019. And honestly meeting her in our connection has been also one of those launching pads for me to really jump out into the world of international collaboration. So all that to say, I think a lot of chance encounters and just a lot of plunging into possible conversations head first has led to this phenomenal mentorship team. And a lot of people who I collaborate with now I see as my inadvertent mentors, and that includes Anna, that includes Maya Henry at UT Austin, Amy Mooney in Oregon, just people who have consistently volunteered their time to mentor me in ways in which I can only say I would have never expected. Jade Cartwright and I have had such a phenomenal collaboration over the past few years as well, where we just had the same interests, and Zoom allowing, we were able to build on those. Jerry Hoepner: That's really an amazing answer to that question. I love the term inadvertent mentors, because I just think that those are the best mentors, where you're as much a mentor to them as they are to you. And it's just this really reciprocal relationship, but it's also built on this organic, like passion and interest for the same kinds of topics. Where it's not forced and that's a really nice kind of look back on your entire process. I was also struck by the term "mentor shopping", or "mentor shopping period", whatever. And I think that's really great that you had an opportunity for that not to be so mentor-led, and I mean it clearly shows through when you talk about your clinical experience and how that was connected to your research experience, and kind of all used to create this amalgamation of who you are. I mean, it's clear in talking with you, it's clear in reading your work that you have that strong, multi prong kind of basis. It's not just research, it's not just this specific area of research, it's really broad and the clinical connection is there, so that makes a lot of sense when I hear you talk about that, for sure. Jeanne Gallée: Oh, thank you. Yeah, I think in hindsight, again, it seems more linear, and in the moment it sometimes felt a little wild, I will say, in terms of just wrangling what do I actually want to pursue, and how. And I'm still figuring that out. But I think this community of collaborators and mentors is truly what has kept me in the field and as well. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, I think when you can connect with other people who are passionate about the work that you're doing. I can't imagine sitting at alone in my office doing a project, and I mean it's just so much more fun when you're doing it with other people. And other people who can expand the way that you think, which I'm sure everyone that you've mentioned on that list really does, when you can say, "Well, I think we should do it this way" and someone says, "Have you thought about…" and it just completely wrecks your world in a good way, "Like, oh my gosh, I didn't think about that, that's so exciting!" and then you just get into this back and forth. Yeah, very fun to hear about that. And again, it clearly shows through in the work that you do. In our previous conversations, you also mentioned this idea, and this again built on those clinical foundations that your initial mission was really to help develop interventions for people with primary progressive aphasia, and then you kind of got not off track, but inadvertently focused on working on assessments. You mentioned that there's just such a need, and this is so common in a lot of areas, but there's a need for more person-centered, ecologically valid strength-based assessment, and that the traditional measures just don't tell us enough. So, I'm really excited to talk about the work that you're doing on assessment, and how that brings us closer to what we need from an intervention standpoint, too. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, so that really is at the heart of what has been my experience. Also, right from the get-go, we started talking about the differences, or the possible differentiation that the field has historically taken in thinking about post-stroke aphasia versus primary progressive aphasia. One of my first real PPA projects in my doctoral work was meant to be a naming treatment study for people living with PPA, and one of the roadblocks I kept hitting was also my mentors and reviewers telling me that I was trying to add too many things. And in that process I realized I don't think just using something that exists for post-stroke aphasia is going to be the best way to address the patients I'm seeing right now. And it's not because there's something wrong with that treatment. That treatment was not designed for these individuals. And that led to many more rabbit holes, and you know me really just feeling this existential crisis of "Well, why are we working on the stimuli that we are, and why are we asking questions about these ones?" And I have so much respect for the assessments that exist, and the individuals behind them, and the time they invested in making them. I am also of the belief that we can move forward and improve our processes. There are certain assessments that may be widely used and have so much again power behind them. You know, we have best associated certain assessments with characterizing a diagnosis, but what I ended up seeing in my placements and throughout my clinical work is that many assessments serve more of a mission of an institution or a research protocol than the person being assessed. And in the face of a person with a terminal condition who is using their precious time to serve you in that space, I just think it's so much more important, or that much more important, to really consider what is most functional for them. What will serve them? And how we, how can we give back to that person? And again, part of that emotion, I think, comes from having worked in many research-centered spaces, where someone might not get intervention afterwards, or they might not understand why they are participating in up to five hours of assessment, and I think that's where that passion for focusing on reprioritizing the patient or the client really came from. Jerry Hoepner: I think that attention to "what's in it for them", is really important and clearly based in kind of where your heart is at and where your clinical mindset is at. Because it's easy to go in and say, "Well, we need this data. We need all the data that we get." but to what end, right? Like, how is it going to help? And how is that going to give us any more information about how to help this person, then what they can't do, right? So, I appreciate that mindset a lot, you know. It makes me think, and this is a little off track, and we didn't talk about this question earlier, but what a shift it will be clinicians working with people with primary progressive aphasia, and how they'll be able to shift from using kind of the existing tools that were out there for other purposes to moving towards tools that are designed specifically for people with PPA, and maybe just a snapshot of your thoughts about that piece. Jeanne Gallée: So I think it's really important to know where the field comes from, the work in which it was grounded in. So, I think it, it makes sense to talk about standardized assessment scores. It makes sense to talk about, you know, the specific assessments that can help us quickly differentiate presentations or needs, right? So, using the symptom-led approach, can we identify specific behaviors really quickly in a standardized way? I think the issue comes in when we stop being dynamic in how we use them. It's very easy to use an assessment in a way that feels rote. It feels just like a test, and it's like you said, "just collecting data for the purpose of collecting data." And lose that aspect of humanity. And maybe I'm putting words in other clinicians' mouths, but especially when a certain condition is rare, like PPA is. You may not have very much experience with seeing someone with PPA, or any type of progressive condition, and feel really stuck and needing to be in the motivation of being really professional, sticking to a certain set of tests. "This feels right." Right, this is what someone told me to do. I can fill this out, and there's something very potentially vulnerable or scary about just going with your gut in those moments. And what Anna Volkmer and I have spoken about so often is just the power of having a conversation with someone, and seeing what you can learn from that conversation, not only about the person themselves, but their communication behaviors. And how you can get so much from that conversation, including the trust and comfort of the client in front of you. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, yeah. One of the things that I think about when you're talking about that is, in working with people with acquired brain injuries and traumatic brain injuries one of the things I've learned is they will tell you, or they will ask, right? They'll say, "What is this? "What kind of information is this giving you?" "Why do we have to do this stupid test?" And I think that's good. I think that's a mindset that we should have when we're thinking about all of the assessments that we do. Why are we doing this? Is this really necessary? And they're very willing to say, "If it's necessary, that's fine, I'll do it, but are you getting something from this that I'm not seeing?" Right, I love that question, and I think it speaks to what you just said, right? Like, there's so much information that we can gather from conversations, from our interactions with people, we should be thinking about getting that, and if we're doing something else, we should have a why directly following, yeah. Jeanne Gallée: Yes, the why is so important, and you're right. Sometimes we do just need to get certain information. I think for me, one of the most striking moments early on in my training was having small talk. You know, just conversation with a person with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, and thinking, "Wow, this all feels quite typical. I'm curious about why they're here? What their testing will look like…" and then moving on to the Boston Naming Test and immediately seeing the challenges that came. That dichotomy is really helpful to have in those moments, but again, there's the argument of why are we asking about the name abacus, right? Why are we using that right now, and how does that represent how someone is performing functionally in their everyday life? Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, yeah, totally. I agree. Can you share a little bit about the RAISE framework, which I really love, because it relates to the way that I think about assessment from the standpoint of counseling, like you build on relationships and connections. William Miller is famous for saying, "The last thing you should ever do at the beginning of a session is assessment." You're beginning of a relationship with someone, don't assess first thing. So, I love that piece, and then thinking about the pact, and I'll let you kind of expand those, but I'll let you unpack them – ha ha- but how that starts to move us towards intervention. Jeanne Gallée: Right. So the RAISE assessment framework was really built out of those conversations, and I guess realizations on my own part about that discomfort with the really rigid end that assessment can…I'll restate that. The rigidity that assessment can have, so again speaking to really, really standardized sets and rigid protocols of specific measures that someone uses, and like you said, having the experience of multiple research participants, as well as patients, asking "Why are we doing this? I know I'm not good at this. Why are we doing it again and again?" And in those moments, not feeling like I had the power to really justify exactly why we were doing everything, apart from, "Oh, this is important for the research study." Which it was, but just feeling like there was that aspect of humanity that was missing, and coming up with my own toolkit in those moments to fill in those blanks. So right after the completion of my PhD, Anna Volkmar and I started speaking a lot more about the power of conversational assessment. And then that led into conversations where we worked with Anne Whitworth, Deborah Hersh, and Jade Cartwright, where again, through the power of Zoom across all times. I was pregnant with my first, and meeting everyone usually at midnight my time. I already was nocturnal at that point!  Where we would just be discussing all of these issues, and what was amazing about this is that, particularly Anne and Deb come from more of the post-stroke aphasia world, and had these amazing principles grounded in those populations where Deborah Hersh had also really come forward with the concept of therapeutic assessment. So as you had said assessment and intervention shouldn't be separate, they belong together and coexist at all times if we're smart about it. And what we ended up doing, first informally and then formally through the more official Delphi process is coming up with a set of principles as a framework for assessment. So, to take a step away from, "Oh, it's just Lucy Goosey, we're having a conversation and chit chat." What we're actually promoting is a pretty structured set of principles to guide the ways in which we can cultivate assessment for individuals with PPA and their loved ones. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, absolutely. I was kind of scanning on my computer, I was trying to think of the name. I love this name of the article, where it says, 'Please don't assess me to death, or something like that. Jeanne Gallée: Yes, yeah. Jerry Hoepner:  Yeah, and, and thinking about that whole entire process from beginning to end as a relationship, as you know, not discreetly assessment, not discreetly intervention, I think it's just really important. Can you talk a little bit about the PACT and kind of where that has moved things in terms of the assessment piece, but also kind of set a set up for intervention and what that looks like? Jeanne Gallée: Great, so the PACT the Progressive Aphasia Communication Toolkit kit builds off of what we put forth with the RAISE assessment framework. So with RAISE we promote that the relationship might be temporary, it might be a single interaction, or it might be long term, and we cultivate that through conversation and then the PACT is a set of scales that leverages that conversation, we take that natural or as natural as can be interaction and use it to come up with a concrete framework of communication strengths. So that might all sound very esoteric. To make that more concrete, there are four scales to the PACT. They're all clinician ratings, where the clinician is asked to look at a pre-recorded conversation that would occur naturally in a clinical or research context, and then on a scale from four to zero, rate the person speaking's strengths. So within the domains of speech and voice, as well as language and social pragmatics, as well as discourse, and the point or the purpose of that was to really anchor a person's communicative ability in one of these more natural environments with a provider. We collect so much phenomenal qualitative data, but at times it can feel challenging to quantify it and the hope with the PACT is that we can quantify our very real, possibly subjective evaluation of a person's communication at a certain moment in time. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, and what I love about that, and you might have a slightly different thought about this, because you're deeper into it, but from an assessment standpoint, you can then do that all the way through. You can say, "Here's where they are this year, here's where they are next year, here's where they are the year after that, or you know, two years ago, or whatever your lens is at that point." You can do that without kind of this constant repeating of, "Okay, let's see how bad you are today compared to a year ago, or compared to two years ago." Just a very different mindset. And I love the focus on "What can you still do? What what's working? And how can we leverage what's working to really help you to actually communicate today?" As opposed to saying, "Oh boy, the ship is sinking." which is kind of the typical approach. Jeanne Gallée: Yes, that exactly what you're saying. The tendency tends to focus on what's no longer there. And while that might be helpful in clinical trials to characterize a person's performance diagnostically and the trajectory of a diagnosis over time. It really does not serve the person who goes home after the assessment, nor their loved ones to help them maintain that autonomy and quality of life, and also caregiver burden. And that is actually one of the points I really love about the PACT, is it builds on that RAISE aspect, that final tenant of evolution or adaptation over time. There's no repeat measure conflict here, where you know something might seem familiar. One of the unique parts of the PACT is that the clinician doesn't fill out the scale while they're talking to the person, they're really just recording them talking, so it is on the clinician side where, as often as they'd like to, they could implement the structured prompts of the PACT and then fill out the scale and see how performance might vary over time. They might see effects of context of the conversation, or the environment, or maybe the time of day, you know, phase of life, but it remains a way to use that really important information you gather through these conversations without recreating a testing environment frequently. Jerry Hoepner: I really love that framework. I think there's a lot of room for that to be used in other contexts as well. I just think it's really a wise way of thinking about it. I also, you just mentioned caregivers and caregiver burden in this context, and how does that fit into this entire RAISE framework, the PACT, and so forth. Jeanne Gallée: I think for both the RAISE assessment framework as well as the PACT the carers play an essential role in the sense that if they are available and present in the patient's life, then they are involved in the process. And so within the RAISE framework, the care partner is involved to provide feedback or to be given feedback, and in the PACT the same occurs, where if they are present at the time of the conversation, they are involved in the conversation. What I tend to do in the people I have piloted the PACT, I say come in as you would naturally, but then also take a step back. Let the person that with PPA that we're talking to take the lead, but I want you to interact as you would naturally. And then they're separately also asked to comment on the strengths that the person with PPA has. Their feedback is so integral because if they are present in a person's life, they play an essential role in promoting anything that we do work on in speech therapy. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, yeah, really well said. And I wanted to dig in, partly because I have envy of this figure, the roadmap figure for PPA, and I think it really sets up well for as we think about professionals out there too, like what's the roadmap, not just for the person and their partner, but what's the roadmap for clinicians, future clinicians, all of that. Maybe you can talk a little bit about that figure. Jeanne Gallée: I'd be delighted to. So, this was one of those, I would say classic for me moments where I had an idea and went to PowerPoint and started playing around with a visual of what I was thinking. The roadmap paper in no way is meant to be the only guide for how we can work with a person with PPA, but was really born out of discussions with Amy Mooney, as well as Zoe Ezzes, and Kristin Schafferr Mendez through the National Aphasia Association about the possible gaps in education or preparation a person might experience when first working with people living with PPA.  There are so many ways in which we could say, "Oh, just work on this exact task. Work on these.." and that can feel so lost and unanchored, unmoored moreover. And I wanted to provide the clinical toolkit that I've been using to help me think about my broader approach. So to not get lost in the weeds, but just generally think about what's my purpose here, what's my journey, and so at the center of this road that I created is the tenant of providing that person-centered care, like we aim to with the RAISE assessment framework, so really bringing it back to establishing that honest and holistic and person-centered relationship with your client and their care partners. And focusing on creating a journey that's unique to the client that I think can feel hard when there are so many unknowns with a condition like PPA, where you're always working with an interdisciplinary team. Which you may or may not have contact with. So the first part of this roadmap is really defining your role. Who are you as a professional, and what kinds of support can you provide, and part of defining your own role includes defining your role relative to the rest of the interdisciplinary team. How can you provide a different approach from the neurologist or the neuropsychologist who play vital but very different roles in a person's care journey? Part of that definition also includes advocating across professions, so a classic conundrum that people with communication-led disorders face is that they may not have certain challenges in other domains, but their communication results in a domino effect of difficulties. And so, as the speech language pathologist, coming up with ways in which you can provide supports to other providers or your client to improve their communication can be essential for that comprehensive care. That might include coming up with a communication notebook that has a single page related to specific questions or common topics when talking to the neurologist or the physical therapist or other providers. And then part of this roadmap includes referring out. So having the humility and confidence to say I can't help with this in the ways that you may need. I will either refer you to a specialist within our field or outside of our field to help with these specific aspects, and I think that's just responsible care. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely. Really well described, and such a perfect. A segway to my next question. I always tell my students, assessment isn't just the first and last session that you're working with someone, and the same goes for intervention, right? It's not excluded from the beginning and the end, right? Like, you can't do intervention on day one, you can't do it on the last day, right? I think we kind of silo those things as well, you know, we assess and we intervene every day side by side. Can you share a little bit of your perspectives on this? And, and how that relates to kind of what we just talked about in terms of that roadmap? Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, I think part of the challenge with some of these concepts is that it's very helpful to have experience in working with individuals, whether it is through formal speech therapy or elsewhere, to feel comfort with the unknown. Because a lot of it relies on your ability to listen and to respond to what you notice. You may inadvertently put in assessment by asking follow-up questions to a point a person made when you were talking about their commute. Ad you may offer different technological supports or just visual supports to your client in that conversation in a way to build up supports to see, "Oh, do we see a difference in how they're responding to what I'm saying? And how I provide support? Or when I dial it back, do we see a completely different direction?" So, it is this beautiful, possibly more art than science approach of responding to what a person is giving you. And there are so many individual differences in all of us.  I always joke about how when I used to collect data on the picture description using both age match controls and people with PPA, I would almost burst out laughing when some of the controls provided responses, because I would get one to two sentences sometimes because see the difference in motivation. A person who does not have a communication concern, does not see the need to show exactly what they can do. And would benefit from some encouragement to show exactly how much they can say, whereas a person with PPA, who might have an Aphasia Quotient that recognizes their aphasia, might speak for five to 10 minutes to show exactly everything that they can accomplish. And so I think having that in your back pocket is really important when it comes to thinking about coming up with your recipe of all the ingredients of your assessment and intervention approach and counseling approach. So, I think that's where most of my work comes from, is that there is no one size fits all, but there are certain ingredients or components that we need to apply, and the exact ratios depend on the person you're working with. Jerry Hoepner: That is such a good description of dynamic assessment and intervention and how that I agree, probably more art than science. And that's hard for people who want a black and white answer, like "Step one…" but it's so true, and, and being effective in working in this context, that really moves us nicely into a recent paper that you did, those global perspectives on the management of PPA, and I was struck by the numbers here. Only 40% of respondents said that they had received training in primary progressive aphasia at their university, and they identified all of these needs, right, like online instruction, sample tools, and activity dealing with end of life care and trainings for end of life care. When you mentioned counseling, that totally relates to what we're up against in terms of counseling, right? No one feels confident or has very good self efficacy. Tey don't know if what you know the lines are, what part is theirs and what part is someone else. And I think just really important to like I said, lay out a roadmap and help people to understand what we were just talking about in terms of that art and science of how do you navigate this space when it has to be individualized for every person, and that can feel uncomfortable for a lot of people. So, I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on that, and kind of what you learned from that context. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, so this research study. Was really an amazing endeavor on part of everyone who was involved. It felt like a grassroots effort to find the speech language pathologists around the world who aren't associated with a particular institution who do work with primary progressive aphasia. So of course it will never be a fully representative sample of every clinician who does so, but I do think we worked very hard to cast a wide net. So we used a snowball method. I contacted almost 40 institutions and governing bodies to find speech language pathologists who do have experience with PPA, because while more and more non-specialist providers will be seeing this patient population, we wanted to hear from the people who currently are in the field and creating their own expertise and toolkits to work with these individuals. So, what we found is that a lot of people are out on their own creating their own wheels, so to speak. And it just really led to that beautiful conclusion of now with the power of our globalization of education and sharing of resources, we can come up with a resource that's shared worldwide. Of course, there will be adaptations to fit different contexts, cultures, languages, but one of the issues has been that the systems of care for PPA have often relied upon very specific individuals. And that's reflected in the educational level. Even I was in the master's program between 2017 and 2019, I didn't hear about PPA formally in my coursework, and if it was mentioned we did not go into any of these aspects of specialized care. Part of that might have been because I didn't take very specific courses that then you know were optional or precluded, so I might have missed it, but I really didn't receive that education in the classroom. I received it through my clinical training, which I would argue is possibly even more valuable, right? You have that experiential training. But I think for clinicians who might want to transition in their careers, or you know, inadvertently in their place of work, are transitioning based on who shows up, that is a huge disservice. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, agreed. And it's a complex issue, right, because I can remember actually teaching about this back before Tom [Sather] was in my department. I taught the aphasia class and the acquired cog class, and I was thinking, like, where do I talk about primary progressive aphasia? Do I talk about that in acquired com? Do I talk about that in aphasia? Do I do it in both? Where do I talk about end of life care, and like, how does that fit in, because that's, you know, at that point I was teaching dysphasia, too. Believe it or not, and I'm like, it's kind of there, it's kind of here, it's kind of, it's kind of in counseling, it's all right. So that makes it tricky to have kind of a uniform message when it's all over the place. And love to just get your thoughts on that too. Like, where do you put that stuff? Like, it's it's PPA, it's end of life care, it's aphasia, it's right, it's counseling, it's so many things at once. Jeanne Gallée: It is so many things at once, and I do think that speaks to the fact that it may well need its own class as part of progressive conditions. Jerry Hoepner: Yeah. Jeanne Gallée: But I do think a large part of what we share there is that understanding of we may also need to shift the identity of who we think about when we think about life care. And when we think about a progressive condition. Since a huge flavor, so to speak, of PPA is the fact that it is early onset, and especially with our cultural shifts, and you know, people starting families later in life. The face of a person with PPA looks very different from, at least in my childhood, of what looked like typical Alzheimer's disease dementia. And it's a younger, possibly more dynamic working person, possibly with little kids at home. And I think that's where that symptom-led approach has been most beneficial for my practice. Where we think about "What are you experiencing and how is it impacting your life?", rather than saying "This is the diagnosis, let's put you over here in this box." Jerry Hoepner: Yeah, the idea of putting it in a box and siloing things really resonates in this context, and I love what you said about identity, right? The identity - what we all have in our mind's eye when we think about end of life care is not the typical person with primary progressive aphasia. Like I can remember as an elementary school student visiting the nursing homes and singing to the residents and things like that, and this was not, this was not the group of people that we were thinking about in that context. Very, very different, and I just think that's a really good mindset shift to recognize how actually broad that is. I'm sure there's people listening to this who work in, you know, end of life pediatric care who want to slap me in the face right now, but right, we have such a different mindset when we're thinking about end of life care, and that reset that you just made super important. Jeanne Gallée: Yeah, yeah, and easier said than done, I think, As well as just seeing who shows up to the University of Washington support groups, and just the own perspectives that individuals bring there. But I think we can do it. I think, as a field, that will be the way in which we can become the best generalist provider, so to speak, where we take general principles of addressing symptoms or situations, and then apply those to diagnoses across the spectrum. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, really well said, and a great place to kind of wrap up our questions, but I want to give you the opportunity, are there points that you want to share before we kind of close our conversation? Things that we missed. Jeanne Gallée: I think the general thread throughout our conversation has just spoken to the power we do have as providers or researchers working with patients with primary progressive aphasia or related conditions, I think when we feel that our expertise in the newest theories or approaches might be lacking, we can always rely upon our empathy and full body listening, just to bring in elements that go across the lifespan, and that in of itself can lead to so many honest and transparent choices in our clinical care that can best serve our communities. I think we are much more empowered than we think we are. Jerry Hoepner: Absolutely, that's a really important thread through many places where clinicians feel uncomfortable. They've got it there and they just have to gain that confidence, and being empowered to step into those moments. Well said. Well, Jeanne it's been just a really fun conversation. I'm sure we could talk all afternoon, but I look forward to catching up to you at future conferences and things like that. It's been my pleasure to have this conversation. So, thank you for being a part of it. Jeanne Gallée: Right back at you, Jerry. Thank you so much. This has been a really fun conversation, and like you said, I hope to meet in person in the near future. Jerry Hoepner: Agreed. On behalf of Aphasia Access, thank you for listening to this episode of the Aphasia Access Conversations Podcast. For more information on Aphasia Access, and to access our growing library of materials, please go to www.aphasiaaccess.org. If you have an idea for a future podcast series or topic, email us at info at aphasia access.org Thanks again for your ongoing support of Aphasia Access.   Resources and Readings 1) The RAISE Assessment Framework: Gallée, J., Cartwright, J., Volkmer, A., Whitworth, A., & Hersh, D. (2023). "Please Don't Assess Him to Destruction": The R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework for Primary Progressive Aphasia. American journal of speech-language pathology, 32(2), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00122  Gallée, J., Volkmer, A., Whitworth, A., Hersh, D., & Cartwright, J. (2024). Applications of the R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework to Support the Process of Assessment in Primary Progressive Aphasia. American journal of speech-language pathology, 33(5), 2280–2290. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00085 2) A roadmap for clinicians just starting to work with PPA: Gallée, J. (2023). A Roadmap to enhance care for people living with primary progressive Aphasia: What Can Be Done Now?. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 8(5), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_PERSP-23-0002  3) Aspects of language functioning in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia: Gallée, J., Gibbons, L. E., Choi, S. E., Lee, M., Scollard, P., Trittschuh, E. H., Mez, J., Saykin, A. J., Foldi, N. S., Mukherjee, S., & Crane, P. K. (2025). Facets of language performance in early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 21(9), e70705. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70705 4) The Progressive Aphasia Communication Toolkit (in production at Alzheimer's & Dementia, but here is the preprint): Gallée, J., Cartwright, J., Henry, M. L., Mooney, A. R., Stark, B. C., Volkmer, A., Dietz, A., Nakano, C., Battista, P., Beales, A., Beber, B. C., Cadório, I., Caldwell, M., Davies, K., Ezzes, Z., Gauch, M., Graney, T., Grobler, S., Haley, K. L., Hausmann, A., … Crane, P. K. (2025). The Progressive Aphasia Communication Toolkit (PACT): A Strengths-Based Approach to Multidomain Evaluation for Intervention. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025.11.25.25340904. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.11.25.25340904 5) A global survey on SLP perspectives on the management of PPA: Gallée, J., Cartwright, J., Grasso, S., Jokel, R., Lavoie, M., McGowan, E., Pozzebon, M., Beber, B. C., Duboisdindien, G., Montagut, N., Norvik, M., Sugimoto, T., Townsend, R., Unger, N., Winsnes, I. E., & Volkmer, A. (2024). Global perspectives on the management of primary progressive aphasia. Scientific reports, 14(1), 19712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70156-5 6) Aspects of language functioning in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia: Gallée, J., Gibbons, L. E., Choi, S. E., Lee, M., Scollard, P., Trittschuh, E. H., Mez, J., Saykin, A. J., Foldi, N. S., Mukherjee, S., & Crane, P. K. (2025). Facets of language performance in early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease dementia. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 21(9), e70705. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70705

Gravado durante a Brasil Brau, este episódio reúne dois papos sobre caminhos possíveis para pensar a cerveja e as bebidas brasileiras para além do óbvio.Na primeira parte, Ludmyla Almeida conversa com Bia Amorim, da BeberÚ Agência, sobre o lançamento da zine Na Língua, criada para provocar o mercado cervejeiro a olhar com mais profundidade para os Brasis que também se expressam no copo. A conversa passa por ancestralidade, botequim, cultura, construção de paladar, narrativas brasileiras e pela importância de pensar a cerveja não apenas como produto, mas também como gastronomia, ciência, história e encontro.Na segunda parte, Ludmyla fala com Mariana Maranho, da Global Food, sobre inovação na indústria de bebidas sem álcool e funcionais. O papo passa por águas lupuladas, bebidas com vitaminas, saudabilidade, baixo teor alcoólico, cervejas sem glúten, low carb, consumo consciente e pelas oportunidades que surgem quando cervejarias começam a se enxergar também como indústrias de bebidas.Um episódio sobre beber os Brasis, olhar para os dados, entender tendências e imaginar novos caminhos para o mercado cervejeiro.Este projeto foi patrocinado por:CBL — Cooperativa Brasileira de Lúpulos: https://www.instagram.com/cblupulo/Pinnacle Ingredientes: https://www.instagram.com/pinnacle.ingredientesEzbrew Equipamentos: https://www.instagram.com/ezbrew

uma leitura que se faz em doses... de uma sede insaciável... de se beber... de ser... de se conhecer e pertencer. sigo com minha jornada... sem pretensão mas com muito coração. música:oxalá MARO

Richard Rasmussen é biólogo, apresentador e explorador da vida selvagem, conhecido por encarar de perto alguns dos animais mais perigosos do planeta. Conquistou o público ao transformar aventura e conservação ambiental em entretenimento.Lucas Costa Beber é produtor rural, formado em Direito e presidente da Aprosoja Mato Grosso. Também atua na liderança da Aprosoja Brasil, representando os produtores de soja e milho e defendendo pautas ligadas ao agronegócio brasileiro.

A quantidade ideal de água varia conforme o peso, a idade e outras características individuais, tornando a hidratação mais eficiente quando adaptada às necessidades de cada pessoa.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Las integrantes de la asociación vecinal 'Murcia Lab' Inma Túnez y Cris Alcázar nos presentan las conclusiones llevadas a cabo por una auditoría ciudadana donde se evidencia una 'desconexión total' entre los datos oficiales y la realidad de la calle respecto al número de fuentes públicas de agua potable en el municipio de Murcia: apenas el 43% de las fuentes incluidas en el inventario municipal de la aplicación 'TuMurcia' están realmente operativas para que una persona pueda hidratarse.Desde la asociación llaman la atención ante la 'Desigualdad y falta de estrategia' y destacan la brecha territorial que supone, señalando al río Segura como una 'frontera invisible dentro del municipio' para el acceso al agua pública en fuentes.Así destacan que mientras que en la zona norte del centro urbano existe una fuente por cada 3.700 habitantes, en los barrios del sur la cifra cae drásticamente a una fuente por cada 27.100 habitantes; además, se denuncia que el inventario del Ayuntamiento está gravemente desactualizado, manteniendo en sus mapas fuentes que desaparecieron hace más de diez años.

Adquiere el "LIBRO DE ORACIÓN. Mi día a día con Jesús" en https://sercreyente.com/libros. Con más de 400 páginas, más de 500 oraciones y decenas de ilustraciones. Ve el vídeo en https://youtu.be/_9Z40IqjHj8________________Lunes, 13 de julio de 2026 (15ª Semana del Tiempo Ordinario)Evangelio del día y reflexión... ¡Deja que la Palabra del Señor transforme tu vida! Texto íntegro del Evangelio y de la Reflexión en https://sercreyente.com/el-que-de-a-beber-a-uno-de-estos-pequenos/[Mateo 10, 34 - 11, 1] En aquel tiempo, dijo Jesús a sus apóstoles: «No penséis que he venido a la tierra a sembrar paz: no he venido a sembrar paz, sino espada. He venido a enemistar al hombre con su padre, a la hija con su madre, a la nuera con su suegra; los enemigos de cada uno serán los de su propia casa. El que quiere a su padre o a su madre más que a mí, no es digno de mí; el que quiere a su hijo o a su hija más que a mí, no es digno de mí; y el que no carga con su cruz y me sigue, no es digno de mí. El que encuentre su vida la perderá, y el que pierda su vida por mí, la encontrará. El que os recibe a vosotros, me recibe a mí, y el que me recibe, recibe al que me ha enviado; el que recibe a un profeta porque es profeta, tendrá recompensa de profeta; y el que recibe a un justo porque es justo, tendrá recompensa de justo. El que dé a beber, aunque no sea más que un vaso de agua fresca, a uno de estos pequeños, solo porque es mi discípulo, en verdad os digo que no perderá su recompensa». Cuando Jesús acabó de dar instrucciones a sus doce discípulos, partió de allí para enseñar y predicar en sus ciudades.________________Descárgate la app de SerCreyente en https://sercreyente.com/app/¿Conoces nuestra Oración Online? Más información en: https://sercreyente.com/oracion¿Quieres recibir cada día el Evangelio en tu whatsapp? Alta en: www.sercreyente.com/whatsappTambién puedes hacer tu donativo en https://sercreyente.com/ayudanos/Contacto: info@sercreyente.com

¡Bienvenido a un nuevo Ethos Bite! En este episodio, Edu y Alberto hablan de una de las habilidades más infravaloradas que puedes desarrollar: la de resetear rápido. ¿Tienes un mal día? Empieza de nuevo mañana.¿Has tomado una mala decisión? Aprende de ello.¿Una discusión con alguien? Sigue con tu vida.¿Te has saltado un entrenamiento? Hazlo mañana.No podemos controlar lo que nos ocurre, pero sí cómo nos afecta.Y ojo, resetear no es tragarte ni evitar tus emociones. Es justo lo contrario: sientes, te jode, te cambia el mood… Y aún  así aprendes a que no te ancle.Te dan el golpe, mueves la cabeza y sigues.En este bite hablamos de:• La habilidad de resetear y por qué no quedarte anclado en un mal momento es de las cosas que más te cambian la vida.• "A tus sentimientos tampoco les importan los hechos": la vuelta de tuerca de Chris Williamson a la típica frase de Ben Shapiro.• Salir de tu mente y entrar en tu cuerpo: por qué el ejercicio es la mejor herramienta para dejar de rumiar (no puedes estar en los dos sitios a la vez).• El músculo como órgano endocrino y por qué moverte no es opcional.• Confundir la herramienta con el objetivo, con la historia del cliente que solo sabía usar el Prowler.• Elegir estar de buen humor sin una razón concreta… y por qué muchas veces no vemos las razones reales.• "Llenar el vasito de agua": las cuatro o cinco cosas que nos convierten en gremlins —comer, dormir, movernos, estímulo intelectual, ir al baño—, tanto para tus hijos como para ti.La próxima vez que tengas el nubarrón encima y te estés montando la película, hazte la pregunta que lo cambia todo: ¿estás realmente mal, o solo te hace falta beber agua, que te dé el sol, caminar, comer algo o dormir?Este podcast está esponsorizado por Programa DOCE, tu mejor opción para conseguir aquello que te propongas con tu físico, tu salud y tu bienestar.Entra en https://programadoce.com/ y ponte manos a la obra.Recuerda unirte a nuestra newsletter "La Mesa" para estar al día de nuestras tonterías varias y alguna que otra herramienta útil: https://ethospodcast.es¿Qué te parecen estos "Bites"? Déjanos tu comentario en Spotify o YouTube, te leemos.¡Comparte con alguien a quien creas que esto puede ayudarle!

Certa vez, Cabrera Infante deu-se a oportunidade de passar algumas horas na presença do seu mito encarnado, esse ídolo que, depois de tanto nos instigar, vai cedendo com o passar dos anos à pressão, e revela as suas falhas, fendas. Assim, com o fito de fazer uma reportagem, este soberbo escritor cubano passou um dia inteiro com Hemingway a bordo do Pilar, o seu célebre iate, pescando ao largo da costa cubana. Muito mais tarde, numa entrevista concedida nos anos noventa, foi interrogado sobre o que lhe revelara essa experiência de proximidade, e se manteve para si o anseio de ser um escritor como Hemingway? A resposta dele veio-lhe numa mistura de blasfémia e mexerico, como quem estivesse a meio de uma abusada e dolorosa refeição, arrancando pedaços de carne aos ossos do próprio pai, cuspindo as partes que já enjoam, e é esta resposta que não admite desperdício: «Queria ser tão famoso como ele. E não porque o seu estilo ou as suas personagens me influenciassem. Era, antes, a sua maneira de viver, a forma como encarava a vida. Embora, naturalmente, com o passar do tempo, ache que ele fez aquilo que os escritores fazem com demasiada frequência. Espanta-me que dedicasse tanto tempo a empreendimentos fúteis. Refiro-me ao ritual de descer todos os dias, às onze da manhã, a Cojímar, subir para o barco e fazer-se ao largo, na Corrente do Golfo, para ver se conseguia apanhar o maior peixe que pudesse existir. Era pura paranóia. Não tinha absolutamente nada a ver com a vida real; tinha tudo a ver com a fantasia. Fui com ele no barco e achei aquilo horrivelmente aborrecido. Das seis da manhã às quatro da tarde, a única coisa que fazia era beber. Embebedava-se de vodka e acabava estendido no convés, incapaz de fazer fosse o que fosse durante o resto do dia, ou quase todo o resto do dia. Depois, de repente, levantava-se outra vez: o efeito da vodka tinha passado e regressava a Cojímar. Se aquilo era um modo de vida, acredite: eu não queria vivê-lo. Ou ir para África matar animais para apanhar uma disenteria medonha e passar dias com diarreia. Ou ir para Espanha atrás de toureiros. Estava verdadeiramente louco, disso não tenho a menor dúvida. E, ao mesmo tempo, vivia numa belíssima casa nos arredores de Havana, onde tinha tudo o que desejava: um pomar de frutas tropicais e uma biblioteca enorme. Ia a Havana ao volante de um Mercury descapotável e almoçava ou bebia no Floridita ou na Zaragozana. Isso não era mau; mas o resto da sua vida foi horrível. Há uma coisa que os escritores fazem muito: perder tempo. Faulkner imaginava-se um cavalheiro do Sul que tinha de caçar raposas todos os sábados. Nesse aspecto, os escritores europeus eram mais profissionais. Não consigo imaginar Joyce a caçar na Irlanda, nem a tentar pescar um espadarte no Canal da Mancha. Levou uma vida muito séria, coerente consigo próprio, com a família e com a sua obra. O único problema de Joyce era a sua atitude distante, a sua imensa vaidade e o facto de ser um bêbedo, como a maioria dos irlandeses. Beber também é uma forma lamentável de perder tempo.» Esta resposta mostra-nos como admiração e entusiasmo acabam por dar origem aos mais impiedosos venenos, neste caso um de sorte moral, em que se censura essa tremenda disponibilidade que faz de um escritor um ser que se passeia assobiando pelos limites, como se Cabrera Infante tivesse desenvolvido uma marca muito particular de ressentimento para os seus fins, não reconhecendo como perder tempo é o elemento crucial de qualquer literatura que não esteja absorvida por essas prioridades injuriosas com que o tempo nos reclama. «Talvez seja bom que o espírito do poeta se deixe penetrar, mais do que afadigar-se para penetrar», assinala Reverdy. Para se chegar a ter a sensação de que o eixo do mundo passa pelos rins de um tipo, como nos sugere Fondane, para sentirmos como alguns são capazes de puxar por essas linhas invisíveis e fazer delas as suas redes, temos de admitir que a literatura se faz com esse risco de desperdiçar dias a fio em troca de um sobressalto, uma cadência que nos lança para o exterior daquilo que habitualmente se encontra nos livros, resistindo à tentação de nos fornecer outros simulacros. Há um excesso de talentos afinados pela percepção daquilo que a época nos exige, mas, se queremos superar este modo de mendigar a nossa própria vida, ainda vamos ter de nos adiantar a nós próprios, evoluir descosendo o forro das nossas circunstâncias, atravessar essa tradição dos oprimidos, aprender alguma coisa com os danados, e chegar ao ponto de termos visto as vezes suficientes o filme todo, imagens sucessivas ardendo até que a retina seja forçada a refazer-se das suas cinzas, já difusa e indistinta nas margens, podendo ser útil essa investigação e velocidade sustida daquilo que preenche a escuridão de uma época como de uma sala, esse filme projectado num cinema e que, pelo seu carácter denso e absoluto, como nos diz Esther Kinsky, constitui sempre, para os espectadores, uma intervenção no curso do mundo. «A experiência de uma tal intervenção era partilhada por inúmeras pessoas, ainda que elas porventura jamais lhe atribuíssem essa designação. Era um processo cultural com que muitos estavam familiarizados, com os seus pequenos rituais, os seus iniciados, fâmulos, artífices e serventes, e que depois começou inexoravelmente a desmoronar-se.» A formação de um espírito crítico passa por partilhar uma mente comum, beneficiando-se dessa proximidade que nos torna aptos a adoptar os estímulos e as inquietações que estão presentes e que trazem um efeito de sobreposição que permite desdobrar o espaço entre nós de forma minuciosa como um horizonte infinito. Já é preciso muito só para se manter à tona do mastigar ruidoso da opinião corrente, safar-se aos catálogos nessa função detrimental proposta à circulação pelos tão ansiosos medíocres, esses que a todo o momento se empenham em garantir que nada de sobrenatural possa impor-se e humilhar essas obrinhas que nos atulham o cenário. Mas, afinal, «o que é o cérebro humano senão um palimpsesto imenso e natural?, interrogava-se Thomas de Quincey… «O meu cérebro, tal como o teu, leitor, é um palimpsesto…» Ora, isto não pode ser outra coisa senão uma proposição maravilhosamente prometedora, pela possibilidade de se prosseguirem essas investigações que, libertando-se das restrições do real, dos modos caquéticos datal reportagem universal, nos façam trepar as árvores que cada um desenha à medida das suas necessidades, do seu fôlego, para se encontrar diante dos frutos da luz dessa orfandade encontrada na vazia e improvável imensidão das coisas. E não devemos enganar-nos a este respeito, pois a ficção é essencialmente um atributo e uma arte de órfãos, dos seres que se sentem de algum modo desencontrados, obrigados a estudar esta luz fodida que nos persegue pelas cidades onde nos deixámos ver nas posições mais degradantes, essa luz que parecia ter-nos arrancado as pálpebras, que à menor coisa nos fez chorar sem termos uma justificação atendível, enquanto nos escondíamos nesses autocarros e aos círculos pelos subúrbios onde zanzávamos sem poder demorar-nos demasiado em territórios que nunca eram os nossos, zonas hostis, com dificuldade em respirar à vista de todos, esse ar imundo que nos fazia sentir como uma peça solta, perdida, e a ficção surgia aos poucos como um aproveitamento dessas reservas insólitas, a longa marcha de um pesadelo a outra coisa. Se este tempo arrasta com ele a sensação de um relatório redigido depois dos eventos, um arrazoado em tom monocórdico, liso, inapelável, o modo mais impassível, inerte de se prestar contas, sem corrigir nem emprestar qualquer cor, ameaçar um contorno de emoção, os ficcionistas trabalham para infundir a realidade de um sonho mínimo, mas no qual vão empenhando toda a sua obstinação, viajando de um lugar a outro, produzindo algo mais forte, alheio às imediatas confissões, um longo exame que nos livra desta ambiente de anedota, dessas frases vazias gravadas no ar, como se inventassem um tom muito específico de azul, algo que só pode ser concebido através do «suspiro de uma cabeça guilhotinada» (Bolaño). No fundo, não basta ao escritor perder dias a fio, tornar-se um odioso meliante, gastar todo o seu tempo para abrir covas à volta da realidade, enlouquecendo com a nostalgia do não vivido, isto para mergulhar nessas zonas que se desprendem do resíduo que nos adormece os órgãos sensíveis. Ou talvez estejam submersos na mesmíssima matéria que os demais, mas dá a sensação que se tornam eles mesmos o fundo da época, traduzem toda a pressão, enfrentam seja o que for em apneia, ao passo que outros desenvolvem guelras e uma desenvoltura tremenda nas águas mais turvas. Alguém constatando este estado de coisas, ainda se dispunha a açular os elementos, e pedia que fossem gastos de uma vez todos os valores de produção reservados a este ambiente de catástrofe… «Que sangre tudo, infinitamente –/ e mal aos nossos lábios venha/ seja espuma, ouro, água». E talvez faça parte da atitude poética querer ir ao encontro do pior. Neste episódio, e a benefício de uma composição menos solvente, a Filipa Martins veio deixar-nos algumas pistas em relação a esse paciente ofício de se recolher as migalhas da memória sem se servir delas para apresentar uma vulgar queixa. Habituada a reconhecer as diferenças de pressão nos vários níveis de profundidade (ou superficialidade) do nosso meio literário, cultural ou mediático, quisemos sonhar para estes dias as pegadas luminosas que lhe possam ser assentadas e também descobrir certas fugas nesse passado que se abre como uma vertigem ao ser possível reconhecer o dom e a maldição daqueles que sempre se atribuíram um dever de deslumbrar (leia-se, assombrar e, até, importunar os demais).

No verão, não basta beber “quando dá sede”: o corpo perde água antes de nos avisar. A Nutricionista Mariana Chaves esclareceSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amigos de #ContenidoExtra, en esta ocasión platicamos con una de las bandas más emblemáticas del rock mexicano, los Amantes de Lola.Formada en la década de los 80, alcanzó gran popularidad con canciones como Beber de tu Sangre, Mamá y Mármol, convirtiéndose en un referente del movimiento Rock en tu Idioma y dejando una huella importante en la historia del rock en español.Los invito a disfrutar el episodio y dejar su comentario#ContenidoExtra #AmantesdeLola

Si torna a parlare di alpinismo e di etica in apertura con uno dei protagonisti degli ultimi 20 anni in Dolomiti.Ale è una guida alpina ma anche un affiatato cercatore di linee. Insieme ad un gruppo ristretto di arrampicatori veneti ha firmato diversi capolavori su molte delle pareti più iconiche delle Dolomiti. E quello che colpisce di queste vie è soprattutto lo stile pulito e la ricerca dell'avventura. Sicuramente un grande spunto per la vostra estate d'alpinismo.............................................................................VERTIGINI è un podcast originale di Matteo Pilon e Alessandro Zanchetta.SE VUOI SOSTENERE QUESTO PROGETTO PUOI FARLO SUL NOSTRO PATREON A QUESTO LINK:https://www.patreon.com/vertiginipodcast/membership............................................................................Music: When We Were Still Alive by Bryo is licensed under a Creative Commons License.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...Support by RFM - NCM: https://bit.ly/3KchqWp

No confundas lo seco con lo muerto; hay áreas de tu vida que no están acabadas, solo necesitan volver a recibir el agua de Dios. ¡Disfruta de esta enseñanza!

Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Episodio exclusivo para suscriptores de Se Habla Español en Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iVoox y Patreon: Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2E2vhVqLNtiO2TyOjfK987 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/sehablaespanol Buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/sehablaespanol/w/6450 Donaciones: https://paypal.me/sehablaespanol Contacto: sehablaespanolpodcast@gmail.com Facebook: www.facebook.com/sehablaespanolpodcast Twitter: @espanolpodcast El mundo de los conciertos en España Hoy vamos a salir un poco del formato habitual para hablar de un tema muy presente en la vida cultural en España: los conciertos. Porque escuchar música está muy bien… pero vivirla en directo es otra cosa completamente distinta. Y además, ir a un concierto también es una situación muy interesante desde el punto de vista del idioma. Hay vocabulario propio, costumbres sociales, formas de interactuar… y muchas pequeñas cosas que no aparecen en los libros. Así que vamos paso a paso, como si estuviéramos preparando un concierto desde el principio. Comprar la entrada Lo primero es conseguir la entrada. En España, casi siempre se compran por internet, a través de plataformas o páginas oficiales. Aquí aparecen expresiones muy útiles como: Las entradas están agotadas → ya no quedan Se han puesto a la venta hoy Quedan pocas entradas Y hay una realidad muy típica: si el artista es famoso, las entradas pueden desaparecer en minutos. De hecho, es muy común escuchar cosas como: He estado esperando desde las diez en punto… y no he conseguido entrada. Eso forma parte de la cultura del concierto. Antes del concierto: el ambiente En España, ir a un concierto no es solo entrar, escuchar y salir. No. Muchas veces empieza mucho antes. Es muy típico quedar con amigos antes, tomar algo, cenar o incluso hacer un pequeño plan alrededor. Por ejemplo: Quedamos antes del concierto para tomar unas cervezas. Aquí aparece algo muy importante: el concierto es también una experiencia social. No vas solo a escuchar música. Vas a compartirla. Llegar al recinto Cuando llegas al lugar del concierto —que puede ser un estadio, una sala o un auditorio— empiezas a vivir otra realidad. Hay colas, hay gente esperando, hay emoción. Y aquí aparece una palabra muy típica: El recinto ¿A qué hora abren el recinto? Van a cerrar el recinto pronto. También es muy común ver a gente diciendo: Vamos a acercarnos a la puerta para coger buen sitio. Tipos de conciertos en España En España hay varios tipos de conciertos, y cada uno tiene su ambiente. Por ejemplo: Festivales → con varios artistas durante varios días Conciertos en salas → más íntimos Grandes conciertos en estadios → más masivos Fiestas populares → con música gratuita en pueblos o ciudades Y esto influye muchísimo en el comportamiento del público. En un festival, la gente se mueve más, entra y sale. En un teatro, todo es más tranquilo. En una fiesta local… puede ser una locura total. El comportamiento del público Aquí es donde empieza lo interesante. En España, el público es bastante expresivo en los conciertos. Se canta, se grita, se aplaude mucho. De hecho, hay frases muy típicas que puedes escuchar: ¡Otra, otra! Además, es muy habitual que el público cante las canciones. No solo escuche. Y esto es algo importante culturalmente: el concierto no es solo del artista, es también del público. Interacción con el artista En muchos conciertos en España, el artista habla con el público. No es solo música. Cuenta anécdotas, da las gracias, presenta canciones. Puedes escuchar frases como: -Gracias por estar aquí esta noche. -Esta canción es muy especial para mí. -Sevilla, estáis increíbles. Y el público responde. Hay una conexión constante. Comida y bebida Dependiendo del tipo de concierto, hay barras donde puedes comprar bebida o algo de comer. Y aquí aparece otra realidad muy española: Beber algo mientras escuchas música es bastante habitual. Frases típicas: Voy a por una cerveza. Espérame aquí, que vuelvo. El móvil en los conciertos Hoy en día hay algo muy presente: el móvil. Mucha gente graba vídeos, hace fotos… Pero también hay debate. Hay personas que dicen: La gente no disfruta, está todo el rato grabando. Y otros dicen: Es un recuerdo. En España verás de todo. El sonido, la iluminación y la experiencia Otra parte importante del concierto es todo lo técnico. Aunque no usemos palabras técnicas, sí hablamos de cosas como: El sonido estaba fatal. Se escuchaba genial. La puesta en escena era impresionante. Puesta en escena es una expresión muy útil. No es solo la música, es todo: luces, escenario, estética… Diferencia entre ciudades También es interesante: no todos los conciertos son iguales según la ciudad. Por ejemplo: En ciudades grandes, los conciertos suelen ser más internacionales. En ciudades más pequeñas, el ambiente puede ser más cercano. Y se dice mucho: El público aquí es muy entregado. Entregado significa que participa mucho, que se implica. Salir del concierto Cuando termina el concierto, hay otra parte importante: la salida. Y aquí puede haber caos: mucha gente tráfico dificultad para volver a casa Frases típicas: Va a ser imposible coger un taxi. Vamos andando, es mejor. Y también: Ha sido brutal. Brutal en España es algo muy positivo: algo impresionante. Después del concierto El concierto no termina cuando sales. Termina cuando lo comentas. Al día siguiente es muy típico hablar de ello: Fue increíble. Sonó mejor de lo que esperaba. Me emocioné muchísimo. Y también hay críticas: Se hizo corto. No me convenció mucho. Si te das cuenta, un concierto es mucho más que música. Es una experiencia social, emocional, cultural… y también lingüística. Así que, si algún día tienes la oportunidad de ir a un concierto en España… no lo dudes. Escucha este episodio completo y accede a todo el contenido exclusivo de Se Habla Español. Descubre antes que nadie los nuevos episodios, y participa en la comunidad exclusiva de oyentes en https://go.ivoox.com/sq/171214

La lucha contra el cambio climático también pasa por decisiones cotidianas. Cada vez más ciudadanos optan por consumir agua del grifo frente a la embotellada, una elección que reduce residuos, emisiones y consumo de recursos. Analizamos qué hay detrás de este cambio de hábitos y cómo acciones sencillas pueden contribuir a un modelo más sostenible.

Meditaciones preparadas (aunque no exclusivamente) para hacer un retiro espiritual y mejorar en su vida cristiana, de oración y de trato con Dios. A cargo del Padre Ricardo Sada Fernández de México.

O café faz parte da rotina de muitos portugueses, mas quando há diabetes surgem dúvidas: será que pode interferir com a glicemia? A Nutricionista Mariana Chaves esclarece.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Segundo medicina tradicional chinesa, hábito — que virou moda na internet — promove e conserva energia que flui pelo corpo; mas o que diz a ciência?

Sonia Santos é uma das vozes mais importantes da música brasileira, que muita gente ainda está descobrindo. Uma artista de trajetória rara, com 60 anos de carreira, que atravessa televisão, samba, soul e jazz com a mesma força e identidade. A cantora e compositora que construiu uma carreira singular dividindo palcos com grandes nomes internacionais e da MPB, agora retorna ao Brasil, em maio, para apresentar o espetáculo “O Samba Mandou Me Chamar”, marcando um reencontro com o público brasileiro após anos de atuação intensa no exterior. Radicada em Los Angeles há mais de três décadas, Sonia fez da cidade um polo de expressão afro-brasileira e consolidou-se como referência cultural. Foi na cidade californiana que concedeu uma entrevista à RFI. Aos 82 anos e cheia de energia que transborda nas conversas e nas suas músicas, subiu ao palco em Temecula, na Califórnia, no dia 17 de abril. Nos últimos meses realizou diversas apresentações na região, na qual é reconhecida como um símbolo de resistência e a ponte entre a ancestralidade e a modernidade global, de onde vêm suas inspirações. Ela afirma que a arte deve manter um olhar atento sobre a política para não transmitir mensagens equivocadas, motivo pelo qual acompanha de perto o tema. “Eu gosto de programas de governo que falam principalmente em saúde, educação, arte e cultura. Então, eu fico de olho nessas coisas, procuro valorizar a minha ancestralidade e fazer com que essas figuras que realmente, vamos dizer assim, fundaram o Brasil, que elas sejam vistas, que elas sejam ouvidas, que elas sejam reconhecidas e valorizadas”, contou à RFI. Uma lenda viva Ícone desde os anos 1960, Sonia compartilhou palcos com nomes como Tim Maia, Jorge Ben Jor e Luiz Melodia. A projeção nacional veio na década seguinte, quando se tornou presença marcante na televisão brasileira, especialmente no Fantástico, da TV Globo. Participou de performances musicais e de trilhas de novelas. Nos anos 1990, mudou-se para os Estados Unidos; logo no início já conquistou a Broadway e abriu shows de nomes como Ray Charles e Nancy Wilson, além de colaborações e encontros com Sérgio Mendes e outros artistas que ajudaram a projetar o reconhecimento da música brasileira, e a potência que é hoje, no exterior. “Eu cantei num festival de artes populares na Tunísia, há uns anos. Havia 54 países representados e quando anunciaram que era música brasileira, todo mundo aplaudiu. Nós tocamos na Rússia, ginásio cheio, e o patrocinador, que era a Coca-Cola, divulgou muito 'Água de beber'. E o povo cantarolova isso (ela canta). Basta dizer que é música brasileira e uma rendição incondicional acontece", revela. Ao lado da cantora Ana Gazzola, integrou o projeto Brazil Brazil, com o qual fez diferentes circuitos internacionais, incluindo cidades na Ásia, Europa e África. O grupo foi responsável por levar repertório brasileiro a festivais de jazz e música do mundo inteiro. Uma missão, segundo Sonia, com muito ritmo e cadência para transmitir amor ao mundo. A artista diz que sua trajetória é guiada pela “voz do seu coração”, uma proposta de vida que a levou a circular por mais de 40 países. Para ela, “todo artista é um canal”, responsável por “transmitir coisas boas e bonitas”. Sonia parte do princípio de que “tudo é energia, força magnética” e acredita ter uma mensagem a passar para as pessoas. “Escolhi as palavras das minhas músicas nessa direção”, conta. Samba como DNA e pioneirismo Seu talento visionário se expressa em músicas como Poema Rítmico do Malandro (1971), que antecipou a cadência do rap anos antes do gênero ganhar força no Brasil. Sonia já experimentava com a métrica e a rima, e adiantou tendências com uma visão artística que sempre esteve décadas à frente. Mas o samba, ah, o samba. Esse bate mais forte e constante no peito. É o eixo central de uma carreira que desafiou fronteiras. Embora tenha transitado com maestria pelo jazz e pelo blues, é na cadência do tambor que sua identidade se solidifica. Tempos de redescoberta Apesar dessa magnitude, o nome de Sonia Santos parece ainda escondido, esquecido do grande público, sendo muitas vezes um segredo guardado por músicos e historiadores. Por isso, o significado ainda maior desse retorno ao Brasil. Será a síntese de uma trajetória que volta ao palco de onde saiu. No novo espetáculo “O Samba Mandou Me Chamar”, Sonia revisita diferentes fases da própria trajetória por meio de um repertório que mistura memória e reinvenção: com clássicos como “Upa Neguinho”, “Água de Beber” e “Brasileirinho”. O show também inclui releituras que dialogam e refletem sua vivência entre Brasil e Estados Unidos e tributos a mulheres que, assim como ela, levaram a música brasileira aos palcos do mundo, como Carmen Miranda e Tânia Maria. “Eles podem esperar de mim uma entrega total, entendeu? Estou completamente rendida às belezas do meu país. Eu amo o Brasil. Eu acho que ele não é a pátria do futuro, ele é a pátria do presente. Eu acho que definitivamente ele está chegando naquele ponto de ter o reconhecimento e o respeito mundial", conclui. As apresentações acontecem nos dias 7 e 8 de maio de 2026, às 20h, no Teatro Raul Cortez do Sesc 14 Bis, em São Paulo.

Hoje, ‘No Pé do Ouvido, com Yasmim Restum, você escuta essas e outras notícias: Trump escala as ameaças: ‘Abram a p*rra do estreito, seus bastardos loucos, ou viverão no inferno’. Augusto Cury e Cabo Daciolo anunciam pré-candidaturas à Presidência. Número de salas de cinema no Brasil recua pela primeira vez após a pandemia. Beber muito álcool em um dia triplica o risco de danos ao fígado. Google libera alteração de endereço do Gmail sem perda de dados. E Artemis II captura bacia lunar vista a olho nu pela primeira vez.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

03-29-2026 - This message was brought to you by Pastor Hector Santiago- www.1bcchbg.com

En el episodio de hoy, Caie y Ale abren el baúl de los recuerdos para confesar sus peores borracheras. De las noches de shots de dudosa procedencia hasta el superpoder de quedarse dormida sobre una mesa (adivina cuál de las dos fue), analizamos por qué nuestra relación con el alcohol ha cambiado tanto y por qué las nuevas generaciones ya le bajaron dos rayitas a las pedas. Si te gusta lo que hacemos y quieres contenido exclusivo, episodios extendidos y ser parte de nuestra comunidad privada, ¡apóyanos en Patreon!

La maravilla de la oración se revela junto al pozo, porque ahí Jesús nos pide de beber. Quizá deberíamos hacer una reprogramación de nuestra forma de entender a Dios. Vamos a Él buscando recibir, cuando lo que realmente ansía es que le demos. Su sed procede de las profundidades de Dios, porque Él, es su esencia, es amor. Busquemos actuar siempre según su beneplácito.

P. Felipe (Chile)Pidamos juntos al Señor de esa agua que sacia, y que nos adelanta la vida eterna[Ver Meditación Escrita] https://www.hablarconjesus.com/meditacion_escrita/dame-de-beber/  

Juan 4, 5-15. 19b-26. 39a. 40-42 En aquel tiempo, llegó Jesús a un pueblo de Samaria, llamado Sicar, cerca del campo que dio Jacob a su hijo José. Ahí estaba el pozo de Jacob. Jesús, que venía cansado del camino, se sentó sin más en el brocal del pozo. Era cerca del mediodía. L'articolo «Dame de beber» – Domingo 08 febrero del 2026 proviene da Radio Maria.

En aquel tiempo, mientras iba de camino a Jerusalén, Jesús llamó aparte a los Doce y les dijo: "Ya vamos camino de Jerusalén y el Hijo del hombre va a ser entregado a los sumos sacerdotes y a los escribas, que lo condenarán a muerte y lo entregarán a los paganos para que se burlen de él, lo azoten y lo crucifiquen; pero al tercer día, resucitará".Entonces se acercó a Jesús la madre de los hijos de Zebedeo, junto con ellos, y se postró para hacerle una petición. Él le preguntó: "¿Qué deseas?" Ella respondió: "Concédeme que estos dos hijos míos se sienten, uno a tu derecha y el otro a tu izquierda, en tu Reino". Pero Jesús replicó: "No saben ustedes lo que piden. ¿Podrán beber el cáliz que yo he de beber?" Ellos contestaron: "Sí podemos". Y él les dijo: "Beberán mi cáliz; pero eso de sentarse a mi derecha o a mi izquierda no me toca a mí concederlo; es para quien mi Padre lo tiene reservado".Al oír aquello, los otros diez discípulos se indignaron contra los dos hermanos. Pero Jesús los llamó y les dijo: "Ya saben que los jefes de los pueblos los tiranizan y que los grandes los oprimen. Que no sea así entre ustedes. El que quiera ser grande entre ustedes, que sea el que los sirva, y el que quiera ser primero, que sea su esclavo; así como el Hijo del hombre no ha venido a ser servido, sino a servir y a dar la vida por la redención de todos".Mateo 20,17-28

ÚNETE A LA ORACIÓN ONLINE el próximo jueves 5 de marzo. Más info y link en https://sercreyente.com/oraciononline/________________Miércoles, 4 de marzo de 2026 (2ª Semana de Cuaresma)Evangelio del día y reflexión... ¡Deja que la Palabra del Señor transforme tu vida! Texto íntegro del Evangelio y de la Reflexión en https://sercreyente.com/podeis-beber-el-caliz-que-yo-he-de-beber/[Mateo 20, 17-28] Mientras iba subiendo Jesús a Jerusalén, tomando aparte a los Doce, les dijo por el camino: «Mirad, estamos subiendo a Jerusalén, y el Hijo del hombre va a ser entregado a los sumos sacerdotes y a los escribas, y lo condenarán a muerte y lo entregarán a los gentiles, para que se burlen de él, lo azoten y lo crucifiquen; y al tercer día resucitará». Entonces se le acercó la madre de los hijos de Zebedeo con sus hijos y se postró para hacerle una petición. Él le preguntó: «¿Qué deseas?». Ella contestó: «Ordena que estos dos hijos míos se sienten en tu reino, uno a tu derecha y el otro a tu izquierda». Pero Jesús replicó: «No sabéis lo que pedís. ¿Podéis beber el cáliz que yo he de beber?». Contestaron: «Podemos». Él les dijo: «Mi cáliz lo beberéis; pero sentarse a mi derecha o a mi izquierda no me toca a mí concederlo, es para aquellos para quienes lo tiene reservado mi Padre». Los otros diez, al oír aquello, se indignaron contra los dos hermanos. Y llamándolos, Jesús les dijo: «Sabéis que los jefes de los pueblos los tiranizan y que los grandes los oprimen. No será así entre vosotros: el que quiera ser grande entre vosotros, que sea vuestro servidor, y el que quiera ser primero entre vosotros, que sea vuestro esclavo. Igual que el Hijo del hombre no ha venido a ser servido sino a servir y a dar su vida en rescate por muchos».________________Descárgate la app de SerCreyente en https://sercreyente.com/app/¿Conoces nuestra Oración Online? Más información en: https://sercreyente.com/oracion¿Quieres recibir cada día el Evangelio en tu whatsapp? Alta en: www.sercreyente.com/whatsappTambién puedes hacer tu donativo en https://sercreyente.com/ayudanos/Contacto: info@sercreyente.com

+ Del Evangelio según San Mateo +En aquel tiempo, mientras iba de camino a Jerusalén, Jesús llamó aparte a los Doce y les dijo: «Ya vamos camino de Jerusalén y el Hijo del hombre va a ser entregado a los sumos sacerdotes y a los escribas, que lo condenarán a muerte y lo entregarán a los paganos para que se burlen de él, lo azoten y lo crucifiquen; pero al tercer día, resucitará».Entonces se acercó a Jesús la madre de los hijos de Zebedeo, junto con ellos, y se postró para hacerle una petición. Él le preguntó: «¿Qué deseas?» Ella respondió: «Concédeme que estos dos hijos míos se sienten, uno a tu derecha y el otro a tu izquierda, en tu Reino». Pero Jesús replicó: «No saben ustedes lo que piden. ¿Podrán beber el cáliz que yo he de beber?» Ellos contestaron: «Sí podemos» Y él les dijo: «Beberán mi cáliz; pero eso de sentarse a mi derecha o a mi izquierda no me toca a mí concederlo; es para quien mi Padre lo tiene reservado».Al oír aquello, los otros diez discípulos se indignaron contra los dos hermanos. Pero Jesús los llamó y les dijo: «Ya saben que los jefes de los pueblos los tiranizan y que los grandes los oprimen. Que no sea así entre ustedes. El que quiera ser grande entre ustedes, que sea el que los sirva, y el que quiera ser primero, que sea su esclavo; así como el Hijo del hombre no ha venido a ser servido, sino a servir y a dar la vida por la redención de todos».Palabra del Señor.

Compra el libro Antihábitos de Borja GirónDuermes mal por estoDormir bien es el mayor secreto de productividad Necesitas entre 7:30 y 8:30Depende de edad y hombre y mujer. Depende de la ilusión que tengas en tu vida. Analiza cómo está cada uno de los 24 factores que afectan a la calidad del sueño y el descanso para mejorarlo:EL ÚLTIMO SEGURO QUE LO COMETES Y ES EL QUE MÁS AFECTA SIN DARTE CUENTA1: Luz: Persianas2: Ruido: Tapones. Ventanas aislantes. Cambiar de habitación. Mudarse. Vecinos. Calle. Coches. Discotecas. 3: Olores4: Temperatura y ventilación. Manta. Aire acondicionado. 21°5: Estrés y pensamientos y problemas. Aprender finanzas. Meditación. Aprender ventas. Divorciarse. 6: Digestión y carbohidratos. Melatonina. Vitamina D sol. Basa tu alimentación en carne, pescado y huevos. Marisco. Acompaña de verduras y hortalizas. Bebé solo agua. Nada de café, tabaco o alcohol. Cafeína, chocolate o teína. Nada de pan, dulces, chocolate, cereales, fruta (solo fresas, arándanos, frambuesas) y de postres. Tampoco sin grasa, sin azúcar porque lleva edulcorantes. Tampoco integral. 7: Cama, colchón y almohada y ropa y coleta8: Solo o acompañado. Tensión familiar. 9: Cansancio y deporte10 Hora de dormir y de levantarse. Estrés de alarma11: Uso de pantallas por luz azul. Usa luz roja. 12: Limpieza de habitación y sábanas. Sudor. Orden de la casa. 13: Salud14: Paz en vida. Felicidad. Propósito. No lo buscas, lo creas. 15. Ritmo circadianoNo es solo la hora de dormir. Es la regularidad. Desajustes continuos → sueño roto.(Despertarte cada día a una hora distinta te revienta el descanso aunque “duermas 8 horas”).16. Exposición a luz solar por la mañanaImpulsa la melatonina de la noche. Sin sol temprano → sueño débil por la noche.(10–15 min al salir de casa ya cambia el día).17. Hidratación… pero con timingBeber poco → mal sueño.Beber tarde → te despiertas para mear.Parece una tontería, pero no lo es.18. Respiración / vías nasalesDormir con la boca abierta o tener la nariz taponada destroza el sueño.Soluciones: tiras nasales, humidificador, limpiar mucosa, alergias tratadas.19. Apnea del sueño no diagnosticadaMuchísima gente la tiene y no lo sabe. Ronquido fuerte + cansancio diurno = sospecha.20. Preparación mental (pre-sleep routine)Tu cerebro necesita una rampa de descenso, no un apagón.Lectura ligera / estiramientos / diario rápido → vale más que mil suplementos.21. Estado hormonalCiclos menstruales, perimenopausia, testosterona baja, tiroides desajustada… Influyen muchísimo.22. Fármacos y suplementos que interfierenAntihistamínicos, antidepresivos, beta bloqueantes, incluso algún suplemento mal usado.Nadie lo quiere mirar… pero cuenta.23. Ruido interior (taquicardia, tensión muscular)No es estrés mental, es fisiológico.Si llegas “acelerado”, dormirte es difícil aunque estés rendido.24: Dormir con el móvil al lado incluso apagado. Reloj inteligente. Auriculares. Bluetooth. WiFi. Nevera. Cosas enchufadas. TV. Del vecino. Torreta de electricidad.Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

En la Mesa de Redacción con Marina Martínez Vicens, Aneyma León y Roger de Gràcia celebramos el día mundial del abrazo, analizamos si beber ya no es cosa de jóvenes y dónde dejamos los zapatos cuando llegamos a casa.

Se utilizó esperma con un gen cancerígeno para fecundación.Las personas con mayor masa muscular presentan cerebros más jóvenes.El gobierno debe facilitar el regreso de los venezolanos deportados.Retiran ungüento, analgésico Mamisan por riesgo a niños.La fertilidad de las mujeres no cae a los 35 años como se creía.Conoce el crecimiento económico del 2025.La percepción de la salud mental de los estadounidenses ha caído un 30%.Ponte al día con lo mejor de ‘La Edición Digital del Noticiero Univision' con Carolina Sarassa y Borja Voces.

[O Observador está a republicar os três episódios mais ouvidos do ano em cada podcast. Este é de 10 de outubro de 2025.] Uma ouvinte pergunta que quantidade de água morna deve beber em jejum para os órgãos funcionarem melhor. A Mariana Chaves esclarece o que diz a ciência sobre quantidade e temperatura da água em jejum.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En esta entrevista, Miguel Celades revela qué propiedades tiene el agua de mar, por qué se la considera una medicina prohibida y por qué guarda una verdad capaz de desafiar a la industria. ¿Hay algo que la ciencia oficial no quiera reconocer? Hablaremos de mitos y realidades, precauciones y claves para usarla de forma segura para potenciar nuestra salud natural y nuestra apertura de consciencia. Miguel Celades Multifacético conferencista y divulgador de informaciones extraordinarias, creador de "Ciencia y Espíritu" e investigador de lo desconocido. RESERVA TU ENTRADA AQUÍ: https://dulcerevolucion.com/actividad/19o-congreso-ciencia-y-espiritu/ Más información en: https://www.mindaliatelevision.com PARTICIPA CON TUS COMENTARIOS EN ESTE VÍDEO. ------------ INFORMACIÓN SOBRE MINDALIA ---------- Mindalia.com es una ONG internacional, sin ánimo de lucro, que difunde universalmente contenidos sobre espiritualidad y bienestar para la mejora de la consciencia del mundo. Apóyanos con tu donación en: https://www.mindalia.com/donar/ - Suscríbete, comenta positivamente y comparte nuestros vídeos para difundir este conocimiento a miles de personas. Nuestro sitio web: https://www.mindalia.com SÍGUENOS TAMBIÉN EN NUESTRAS PLATAFORMAS https://www.mindalia.com/plataformas/ *Mindalia.com no se hace responsable de las opiniones vertidas en este vídeo, ni necesariamente participa de ellas. #AguaDeMar #Beneficios #Riesgos

Mix Name: DJ Sencillo – Bachata Pa' Beber Romo Website: https://www.iamlmp.com/ Join Our Discord: https://discord.com/invite/iamlmp Join Us DJs New Remixes & Blends: https://www.iamlmp.com/recordpool Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iamlmp/ DJ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/djsencillonyc/ Download our DJ Music App Daily Mixes: https://linktr.ee/iamlmp #bachata #iamlmp #bachatamix