Podcasts about galant

Today we are revisiting a tragic case of negligence which originally captivated us back in 2024.  When Marie and Pierre Curie discovered radium in 1898, the chemical element was quickly adopted by manufacturers for its luminescent properties that would go on to be used in, among other things, the painting of clock faces, watches, and instrument panels, allowing them to be seen in the dark. At the time, the introduction of radioluminescent materials into manufacturing was hailed as a scientific solution to an age-old frustration, but it didn't take long before that solution was shown to have terrible consequences. As a radioactive element, radium is highly toxic to humans, particularly when ingested or inhaled. While it seemed unlikely that anyone would ingest or inhale the radium used to paint a clockface, this fact posed a serious problem for the largely female factory workers whose job it was to paint the dials. These “Radium Girls,” as they would come to be known, not only spent most of their day in close proximity to the paint, but also employed a technique in which they frequently wet their paintbrushes with their mouths, consuming small amounts of radium in the process. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, hundreds of young women working in at least three radium dial factories in the United States suffered deadly radiation poisoning as a result of working so closely with radium, all without any safety protocols and completely unaware of the dangers. After dozens of deaths, a group of factory workers successfully sued their employers for damages, exposing the widespread disregard for worker safety. While the suits were generally a major victory for the American labor movement, it was ultimately hard-won and little comfort to those who would die within a few years. References Camden Courier-Post. 1928. "Woman radium victim offers living body to aid in search for cure." Courier-Post, May 29: 1. eGov Newswire. 2021. "Menedez leads colleagues in introducing senate resolution to honor the lives and legacy of the 'Radium Girls'." eGov Newswire, June 26. Evening Courier. 1927. "Radium poison victims want damage suit limits raised." Evening Courier, July 19: 2. Galant, Debbie. 1996. "Living with a radium nightmare." New York Times, September 29: NJ1. Lang, Daniel. 1959. "A most valuable accident." New Yorker, April 24: 49. McAndrew, Tara McClellan. 2018. The Radium Girls: An Illinois Tragedy. January 25. Accessed July 8, 2024. https://www.nprillinois.org/equity-justice/2018-01-25/the-radium-girls-an-illinois-tragedy. Moore, Kate. 2017. The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women. New York, NY: Sourcebooks. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. n.d. Radium Girls: The Story of US Radium's Superfund Site. Environmental Preservation Snapshot, Orange, NJ: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. New York Times. 1928. "Finds no bar to suit by radium victims." New York Times, May 23: 11. Prisco, Jacopo. 2017. "Radium Girls: The dark times of luminous watches." CNN, December 19. United Press. 1928. "Woman, dying by degrees, tells of symptoms of radium posioning." Courier-News, May 16: 6. —. 1928. "3 more are victims of radiun poisoning." Evening Courier, May 22: 1. Cowritten by Alaina Urquhart, Ash Kelley & Dave White (Since 10/2022)Produced & Edited by Mikie Sirois (Since 2023)Research by Dave White (Since 10/2022), Alaina Urquhart & Ash KelleyListener Correspondence & Collaboration by Debra LallyListener Tale Video Edited by Aidan McElman (Since 6/2025) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant.Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

Andrew got the Volvo to move under its own power and it's another week of it being painfully close to being done enough to drive. Meanwhile Andrew is continuing to chase the Coolant temp issue in the Galant, classic Mitsubishi issue. Brad has the Merkur listed on Cars and Bids. We talk some R/C with Scale Auto Cast and then discuss a little NASCAR.  Please Rate, review and subscribe to the podcast on your favorite listening platform. Comments, Questions, complaints; email us at autoofftopic@gmail.com Join the Discord, message us on the socials for a link. Keep your cars analog and Aim for the Roses!

Ce mercredi, Martin Buxant reçoit Jacqueline Galant, Ministre wallonne en charge des Sports, de la Fonction publique et des Médias. 

durée : 00:58:40 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit - Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, née en 1626 à Paris, épouse Henri de Sévigné. Rapidement veuve, la marquise de Sévigné fréquente les cercles lettrés. Sa correspondance, qui fait aujourd'hui sa renommée posthume, donne le ton d'un siècle où se déploient la galanterie et la préciosité. - réalisation : Maïwenn Guiziou, Thomas Beau, Daphné Leblond, Jeanne Delecroix, Jeanne Coppey, Raphaël Laloum, Chloé Rouillon, Sidonie Lebot, Luce Mourand - invités : Geneviève Haroche-Bouzinac Professeure de littérature française de l'Âge classique, Myriam Dufour-Maître Spécialiste de l'histoire des femmes de lettres du XVIIe siècle. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Tout est par grâce - Jean Pierre GALANT by Eglise Destinée

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant.Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

durée : 00:58:40 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit, Maïwenn Guiziou - Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, née en 1626 à Paris, épouse Henri de Sévigné. Rapidement veuve, la marquise de Sévigné fréquente les cercles lettrés. Sa correspondance, qui fait aujourd'hui sa renommée posthume, donne le ton d'un siècle où se déploient la galanterie et la préciosité. - réalisation : Thomas Beau, Daphné Leblond - invités : Geneviève Haroche-Bouzinac Professeure de littérature française de l'Âge classique; Myriam Dufour-Maître Spécialiste de l'histoire des femmes de lettres du XVIIe siècle.

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant.Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

Vandaag bespreken we het boek Wachten, een levenshouding, van Dirk de Wachter. Waarom wachten als het sneller kan? Dat is het gevoel van de ondernemer. Terwijl wachten, ruimte maken, veel oplevert. Denk aan betere beslissingen, focus, meer aandacht voor de lange termijn, betere relaties. Dat is waar dit boek je inspiratie kan geven. Hoe je ruimte maakt voor een beter resultaat. Dirk de Wachter is psychiater-psychoterapeut en hoogleraar. We bespraken eerder Borderline Times van hem en andere bekende boeken van hem zijn De van het ongelukkig zijn en Vertroostingen. Hij is een graag geziene gast in Nederlandse programma's zoals Buitenhof https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMU8KDnfwBQ . Dit is een video van VPRO boeken met Dirk over het boek Wachten https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqbMClKHEXE https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirk_De_Wachter Hij is naar eigen zeggen erg beïnvloed door filosoof Emmanuel Levinas en schrijver Michel Houellebecq. In 2021 maakte Dirk De Wachter bekend dat hij kanker heeft. Voor mij is het een heerlijk boek waarin De Wachter het belang van wachten en stilstaan in de snelle wereld verduidelijkt. Dit doet hij vanuit verschillende standpunten, persoonlijk uit zijn eigen leven of in zijn praktijk. De hoofdstukken zijn kort, ongeveer 10 pagina's, en het leest gemakkelijk. Het is fijn om het per hoofdstuk te lezen en dan te laten bezinken. Wat ik soms lastig vind, zijn de Franse stukjes tekst die niet vertaald zijn. Zo goed is mijn Frans niet. De inhoudsopgave Wachten Wachten, een levenshouding Wachten bij de bakker Wachten en wondere gedachten Wachten zonder verwachting Wacht niet te lang, maar wacht als het kan Dichter bij het wachten Wachten op de verdieping Wacht maar, niet alles moet nu Wachten op de liefde Wachten om de tijd te doden Wacht eens… bidden we nog? Wachten op slecht nieuws Het museum van De Wachter Wachten op wat nog komen gaat Wachten Hij vertelt over zijn vriend en mentor Sam IJsseling en hoe het idee voor dit boek ontstond in 2009. Een beschouwing over het wachten. Waarbij Dirk opmerkt dat zijn achternaam de essentie van het leven bevat: de wachter. Wachten, een levenshouding Het wachten zonder verwachting (Heidegger Gelassenheit ist das Warten ohne Erwartung) Mensen misbruiken soms het ‘wachten' als alibi om niets te doen. Dat is niet de levenshouding die Dirk bedoelt, die zelf , nu de kinderen ouder zijn, harder werkt dan ooit. Niets doen is je verantwoordelijkheid ontlopen, zegt hij zelfs. Het is niet de verbinding met de ander aangaan. Wachten is niet niets doen. Wandelen en wachten gaan goed samen. Hij noemt de flaneur. Wandelen en wachten, zonder doel. De Wachter wandelt vaak over kerkhoven. Verbinding aangaan met anderen, de doden. Bijzondere moment van zijn oom, die in een woonzorgcentrum wachte op zijn dood. Wachten bij de bakker Het wachten in de rij, buiten, voor de bakker. Een boekje lezen in de rij. Het verhaal over Bernard Dewulf die hij daar ziet in die rij, twee weken later overlijdt, de ontmoeting met zijn weduwe na een lezing. Lezen tijdens het wachten is heerlijk.  Het uitkijken (wachten) naar iets lijkt niet meer te kunnen. We willen spullen en het resultaat zo snel mogelijk. Terwijl het wachten op dat resultaat net zo mooi is, of zelfs mooier dan het resultaat zelf. Zo beschrijft hij het werk van Levinas en het werk en wachten op het resultaat. Zoals de eerste appels van je eigen appelboom. Als afsluiting zegt hij nog dat we in de coronatijd hebben geleerd om te wachten en verbinding te maken. Wachten en wondere gedachten Dat doet het wachten: het overstijgen van de kloktijd, het aanzetten tot wondere gedachten, het ontstijgen van het dwingend moeten, het proeven van de wezenlijkheid van het bestaan. (mooi) Met zijn dochter op een bankje wachten tot de sluis weer dicht is en ze verder kunnen wandelen. Wachten zonder verwachting p49 Hij vertelt over hoe lastig lezen was in de tijd dat hij ernstig ziek was. Hij las één boek samen met zijn zoon - Een odysse en besprak ieder hoofdstuk samen met zijn zoon. De zin van het leven: ‘zum Tode leven' enkel omdat we sterven heeft het leven zin. Alleen omdat we doodgaan, krijgt wat we hier doen betekenis. (wow) Niet vluchten voor het leven, maar goed en rustig en bedachtzaam nadenken over wat we doen en waarom. Misschien moeten we minder doen en beter nadenken over wat, waarom en wanneer. (WOW). Past goed bij mij (en bij ondernemers). Introduceert een filosoof die ik nog niet kende, Henri Bergson (de beroemste filosoof van de wereld - waarom kende ik hem nog niet) - Tijd en vrije wil, lezen. De Wachter noemt ook wachten in een rij, niet voordringen. Iemand voor laten gaan. Galant zijn. Levinas wachtte heel lang op erkenning omdat hij nooit op de barricades sprong. - Voor erkenning moet je dus positie innemen, de barricades op. Het programma Donderdagen met Dirk De Wachter https://npo.nl/start/afspelen/brainwash-special  Levinas - Het zijn bestaat niet uit rusten in zichzelf, maar uit zichzelf ontdoen van zichzelf. Iets zijn betekent toegewijd zijn aan de ander. Zonder de ander was ik geen mens. Wacht niet te lang, maar wacht als het kan p68 De lastigheid is er nog, maar het leven is goed. Hoe kunnen we een goed leven hebben met een ernstige kwetsbaarheid die nooit helemaal voorbijgaat? Herstel zit in verbinding gaan. Geduldig aanwezig zijn en wachten tot mensen zelf een stap zetten. Niet te veel zeggen over wat mensen moeten doen. Mooi verhaal over het Wachthuis voor mensen die op de wachtlijst voor de psychiatrie staan. Dichter bij het wachten Geweldig om zo je netwerk met waardevolle mensen uit te bouwen. 'Niet door te zoeken, maar door te wachten en te vinden.' p85 In dit hoofdstuk staan veel quotes van andere boeken en gedichten. 'Schilderen, dat is wachten.' Het echte werk is dus wachten. De kunstenaar wacht. Dagboek van een dichter - Een levensboek: veertig jaar lang elke dag één zin, één regel. Wow. Michaux p91 'Het leven verstrijkt, verdwijnt, even snel als het wordt gebruikt; lang duurt het alleen voor wie in staat is tot zwerven, luieren. Aan de vooravond van zijn dood beseft de man van de daad en de arbeid - te laat - dat het leven van nature lang duurt, een duur die ook hem ten deel had kunnen vallen als hij zich maar niet constant tegenaan had bemoeid. Morning Pages - is ook zoiets. Schrijven komt er vanzelf op papier. Wachten op de verdieping Wacht maar, niet alles moet nu Wachten in een professioneel leven is absoluut niet zo slecht. Neem tijd om te groeien in je functie. Laat het rustig doordringen. Word beter. Watchful waiting. Beleggen in verbinding. Samen met mensen. Dat is heel kostbaar. Soms komen die leidinggevenden bij hem. Ze hebben een burn-out en het niet-wachten heeft hen tot wanhoop gedreven. De professionele wereld zou beter functioneren als we beslissingen bedachtzamer maken. Jonge mannen en vrouwen zouden op jongere leeftijd meer aandacht aan het gezinsleven moeten besteden. Pas als de kinderen groot zijn, gaan ze voor die carrière. Zijn stelling is dat het leven beter wordt met het ouder worden. Er komt met het ouder worden een soort geduld. Net alles moet nog. Wachten op de liefde Twijfel desnoods lang. Wees omzichtig, wacht, bespreek, denk lang na en beslis dan pas. Maar als je beslissing valt, moet dit je motto zijn: bemin je keuze. Je verandert in relaties niet tegelijkertijd. Iedereen groeit op zijn of haar eigen wijze mee. Zo scharnier je aan elkaar. (mooi) Over scheiden. Grote mensen moeten doen wat ze denken dat ze moeten doen, maar ze moeten vooral de zorg voor hun kinderen niet uit het oog verliezen. De verticale verbindingen zijn essentieel. Als je de keuze niet bemint, geef je die keuze geen kans. Als ouder niet te veel je eigen verwachtingen op je kinderen afwentelen. Het kind moet eigen dromen kunnen creëren. Liefst met Gelassenheit. Wachten om de tijd te doden Bij het vissen is het wachten de essentie, maar ook de verbinding tussen vader en zoon (of opa en kleinzoon). p115 als ouder heb je de taak om je kinderen af en toe te begrenzen. het is belangrijk dat ze zich kunnen vervelen. Niet alles moet ingevuld worden. Om van binnenuit, en vanut de verveling de creativiteit doen opstijgen. (geldt ook voor de volwassene zelf) Zoektocht naar de zin (Il y a). Dat kan niet door te geneiten van de kicks, maar wel door te genieten van de gewone dingen in het leven. De wereld dankbaar beleven als een goeie plek.

La startup murciana BeVit Organic, liderada por las emprendedoras Lucía Galant y Marta Calvo, ha lanzado al mercado un innovador "shot" saludable 100% natural que transforma una receta ancestral de ajo, cebolla y miel en un hábito diario para fortalecer el sistema inmune,,. Desarrollado bajo el amparo del programa de innovación Incova de CROEM y con el apoyo del Instituto de Fomento, el producto emplea procesos que eliminan el fuerte sabor y olor de sus ingredientes base, destacando por su alto contenido en quercetina y alicina,,. Con la constitución oficial de su sociedad y el estreno de su tienda online esta misma semana, la empresa busca posicionarse tanto en la venta directa como en el canal Horeca premium, ofreciendo una alternativa de bienestar funcional sin aditivos ni químicos,,.

Les dons et le fruit de l'Esprit - Jean Pierre GALANT by Eglise Destinée

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant.Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

Au-delà de la puissance, Le cœur aimant du Père - Jean Pierre GALANT by Eglise Destinée

Dans l'émission du 27 août 2025, Laurent Ruquier a raconté son "date" assez original... Pendant ces fêtes, retrouvez tous les jours en podcast les meilleurs moments depuis le début de cette saison ! Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant. Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant. Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

We hope you have a blessed Sunday. Here is the sermon audio from our guest preacher, Pastor Jonathan Galant. Like our Facebook page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconfaceboo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kFollow us on Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/ubconinstagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our website for more information: https://www.uitenhagebaptistchurch.co.za⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All rights reserved to Uitenhage Baptist Church.

Libéré pour vivre la puissance de son amour - Jean Pierre GALANT by Eglise Destinée

Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

若說Galant是台帥到爆的2.0房車，相信眾多人應會贊同，但若說它是款貨真價實的運動房車，大家應該會有些懷疑，沒錯，在國內投產的第八代Mitsubishi Galant就是一款極具話題性的車款，雖說它有V6引擎，但性能卻不突出，它有著殺氣騰騰的造型，懸吊卻是走舒適取向，直到後來改換EASS三段可調避震才有所改善，而且中期改了俗稱”豬鼻”的水箱護罩，卻被眾人嫌到爆，之後才又改回來，並找金城武代言，但銷售並未因此有所拉抬。還記得這段故事嗎？一起來回憶吧！ #行動星球 #島叔聊天室 #Galant #Mitsubishi #EASS #V6 #金城武 #Celsior #島耕作 -- Hosting provided by SoundOn

In episode 11 of Platform Builders, Christine Spang and Isaac Nassimi chat with Greg Galant. Greg recounts his early entrance into podcasting, social media, and eventually PR tech. He shares war stories from the early 2000s, including launching a podcast before “podcasting” was popular, creating the viral Shorty Awards, and bootstrapping Muck Rack into a multi-million dollar SaaS company. The conversation offers a unique lens on innovation, timing, media evolution, and how AI is reshaping earned media.

Eriksholm erzählt ein mitreißendes Drama über eine Gesellschaft im Wandel und das Festhalten an Freundschaft und traditionellen Werten. Gloria und Michi haben mit dem Spiel zwar unterschiedliche Erfahrungen gemacht, wussten es aber beide sehr zu schätzen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on CounterSpin: We've always heard that racists hate quotas, yet Stephen Miller's “3000 a day, however which way” mandate is terrorizing immigrant communities — brown immigrant communities — around the country. The response from people of conscience can look many ways: linking arms around people in danger, absolutely; vigorously disputing misinformation about immigrants, whether hateful or patronizing, also. But another piece is gaining a deeper, broader understanding of migration. News media could help answer one implied question — “Why is anyone trying to come to the U.S. anyway?” — by grappling with the role of conditions the U.S. has largely created in the places people are driven from. We talk about that largely missing piece from elite media's immigration coverage with Michael Galant, senior research and outreach associate at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Anyone who pays attention and cares can see that the Trump budget bill is a brazen transfer of resources from those that are trying to meet basic needs to those that can't remember how many houses they own. But corporate reporting rarely breaks out economic policy in terms of how it affects different people — especially how it affects communities for whom they show no consistent concern. Economic policy is itself racialized, gendered, regionalized, targeted. Humanistic journalism would help us see that. LaToya Parker is a senior researcher at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and co-author, with Joint Center president Dedrick Asante-Muhammad, of the recent piece “This Federal Budget Will Be a Disaster for Black Workers.”   The post Michael Galant on Sanctions and Immigration / LaToya Parker on Budget's Racial Impacts appeared first on KPFA.

News media could help explain immigration by grappling with the role of conditions the US has largely created in the places people are driven from.

En España los coches japoneses anteriores a los años 90 son casi desconocidos… y hay coches realmente espectaculares, interesantes y muy curiosos. Os he traído 10 y como siempre, mi reto, es descubriros alguno desconocidos para vosotros… ¿lo conseguiré? En España, salvo Canarias, no comenzaron a importarse los coches japoneses hasta la década de los 80 y no llegan a ser realmente populares hasta los años 90. Al otro lado del “charco” sois mucho más afortunados y a veces no entendéis porque hay coches, como algunos de estos, prácticamente desconocidos en España. Además, el mercado japonés es muy particular y también os he traído versiones exclusivas o “casi” para el mercado interior. Toyota Century (1967). Vamos a hablar en un coche de lujo, super lujo, poco conocido que Toyota fabricó de forma casi artesanal y con cuenta gotas desde 1967 hasta 2023 como limusina y desde entonces hasta nuestros días, como SUV de lujo. Toyota Sprinter Trueno AE86 (1983). Es un coche muy popular en algunos ambientes, gracias a las películas de la serie “Initial D”, al manga y al Drift. No soy fan de ninguna de estas cosas, pero sí del Trueno, de menos de una tonelada de peso y sobre todo con el motor TRD de “Toyota Race Development”, de 1,6 litros, 4 cilindros, 20 válvulas, turbo y 220 CV a… ¡cerca de 10.000 rpm! Fue una versión especial de TRD muy minoritaria. Mitsubishi Debonair AMG (1987). Si te hablan de AMG enseguida vas a pensar en Mercedes-Benz y, de hecho, desde 1999, es propiedad de la marca alemana. En los años 80, AMG preparaba coches a cualquier marca que se lo pidiese y le pagase… como fue el caso de Mitsubishi. En esta lista encontrarás dos Mitsubishi AMG. Nissan Silvia (1988). El primero, aparecido en 1965 me parece realmente bonito, me recuerda a los Iso Rivolta… una marca que, desde luego, merece un video. Pero he elegido el S13 de 1988, que ganó en su país el premio al mejor coche japones y que, hasta donde yo sé, no se exportó fuera de Japón, como sí sucedió con algunos de sus sucesores, con la denominación Nissan 200 SX o similares. La versión más alta de gama fue un 2 litros turbo de unos 200 CV y hubo una rara variante descapotable fabricada por Autech Japan que hoy en día son verdaderas rarezas muy cotizadas. Subaru Rex Supercharged VX (1988). Os he traído este Subaru, porque quería incluir algún coche de esta marca. Un coche de apenas 3,19 metros de largo por 1,39 metros de ancho, con un motorcito por supuesto bóxer bicilíndrico de 550 cm3 y que gracias al turbo consigue 55 CV para menos de 700 kg… Mitsubishi Galant AMG (1989). A pesar del relativo éxito del Debonair AMG se ve que Mitsubishi quedó contenta con esta relación y quizás el mejor exponente de estos casi desconocidos Mitsubishi AMG fue este Galant. La base de partida era mejor y gracias a AMG los motores atmosféricos de 2 litros y 4 cilindros llegaron a ofrecer más 170 CV a más de 8.000 rpm. Mitsubishi FTO (1994). Este FTO, derivado de la plataforma del Galant, no era tan ambicioso. Pero era bonito, con un chasis muy afinado, tracción delantera y que con su motor V6 de 2 litros, primero con 180 CV y luego con distribución variable y 200 CV, era muy divertido y agradable de llevar… una joya, sin duda. Honda Integra Type R DC2 (1995). Una verdadera joya, muy apreciado por los aficionados al drift, refinado y con tracción delantera. Lo mejor de este modelo era su motor, una variante de B18C de 1.8 litros, por supuesto con distribución VYEC, que en su versión para el mercado japones ofrecía 200 CV y subía… ¡hasta casi 9.000 rpm! Toyota Mega Cruiser (1995). Te puede parecer un Hummer, pero no lo es… o sí, el Hummer “a la japonesa”. Su motor era curioso, un enorme 4,1 litros de solo 4 cilindros y unos escasos 153 CV, que parecen pocos para mover las más de 2 toneladas y media que pesaba ese coche. Otra curiosidad: A baja velocidad cuenta con dirección a las cuatro ruedas, para mejorar su maniobrabilidad. Nissan Pulsar VZ-R N1 (1998). Y cerramos con el coche más moderno que nació en la que todavía era una era dorada para estos deportivos que podemos clasificar con “Super GTi” y que nacieron a la sombra de una categoría definida para la competición y que de denominaba N-1 que limitaba los motores a 1.6 litros atmosféricos. Conclusión. ¿Recordáis cuando al comenzar el canal algunos me acusaban de que no me gustaban los coches japoneses? Incluso hicimos un vídeo, casi en plan de “coña” titulado “¡No me gustan los coches japoneses!” en el que se decía casi lo contrario… ¡Como no me van a gustar los coches japoneses! Y menos coches como estos 10 que os he traído. ¿He conseguido el reto? ¿Había alguno o algunos que no conocieseis?

Face à la gent féminine, Henri IV, a, semble-t-il, toujours fait preuve d'une certaine faiblesse. Marié à Marguerite de Valois, puis à Marie de Médicis pour des raisons politiques, celui que l'on surnomme le Vert-Galant a vécu des passions ardentes avec de nombreuses maîtresses, Gabrielle d'Estrées et Henriette d'Entragues en premier lieu. Ces femmes ont été plus que des amantes. Elles étaient des « presque reines », et bien souvent les mères de bâtards royaux. Pour évoquer ces femmes souvent détestées à leur époque, Virginie Girod reçoit l'historienne Flavie Leroux. Spécialiste d'histoire de la cour et des femmes en France à l'époque moderne, en particulier des maîtresses royales, elle est l'auteure de plusieurs livres à ce sujet, dont "L'autre famille royale", disponible aux éditions Passés Composés.Au Cœur de l'Histoire est un podcast Europe 1.- Présentation : Virginie Girod- Production : Armelle Thiberge- Réalisation : Clément Ibrahim- Diffusion : Estelle Lafont- Composition du générique : Julien Tharaud- Promotion et coordination des partenariats : Marie Corpet- Visuel : Sidonie Mangin

Quel roi de France surnomme-t-on le Vert Galant ? Henri IV, bien sûr ! Tout au long de sa vie, celui qui hérite de la couronne en 1589 multiplie les liaisons amoureuses… et charnelles ! Plusieurs dizaines de maîtresses auraient reçu ses faveurs parmi lesquelles Gabrielle d'Estrées ou Henriette d'Entragues. La semaine prochaine, dans Au cœur de l'Histoire, découvrez un entretien inédit dans lequel Virginie Girod recevra l'historienne Flavie Leroux afin de s'intéresser aux amours du bon roi Henri et à l'influence réelle ou fantasmée de ses favorites.

In this episode of Guerrilla History, we bring back Pawel Wargan (whom you'll remember from our episode  Disarming Empire + the Elections in Pakistan) as a guest host to help us interview Michael Galant about a new publication from the Progressive International, a series of essays commemorating the New International Economic Order at its 50th anniversary, and updating it for today.  These essays are available in English here, and in Spanish here.  These essays include historical entries from people like Allende, Nyerere, and Sankara, as well as new essays from comrades including Max Ajl, Cheng Enfu, and Miguel Díaz-Canel.  You will certainly find some essays of great value to you in this collection, so be sure to check it out!   Michael Galant is a member of the Secretariat at the Progressive International and is a member of their coordinating team for the New International Economic Order.  You can follow Michael and keep up with his work by following him on twitter @michael_galant.   Pawel Wargan is an activist, researcher, organizer, and coordinator of the Secretariat of the Progressive International, and has been published in many places. You can follow Pawel on twitter to keep up with his latest work @pawelwargan Help support the show by signing up to our patreon, where you also will get bonus content: https://www.patreon.com/guerrillahistory 

Get to Western Province SAGDB IPT player Jaydon Galant of King David Mowbray Golf Club.

The latest guest on The PR Week podcast is Greg Galant, cofounder and CEO of earned media platform Muck Rack. He chats about the rapidly changing world of media relations, including the new mix of traditional media with influencers and content creators, and why teams should be eager to work with both. Plus, his take on how long a podcast should run. Also on the agenda, the top marketing and communications news of the week, including layoffs at Edelman, a new chairman at Allison and RF|Binder's acquisition of Taft Communications.   Follow us: @PRWeekUSReceive the latest industry news, insights, and special reports. Start Your Free 1-Month Trial Subscription To PRWeek

Canadian journalist Nora Loreto reads the latest headlines for Monday, November 25, 2024.TRNN has partnered with Loreto to syndicate and share her daily news digest with our audience. Tune in every morning to the TRNN podcast feed to hear the latest important news stories from Canada and worldwide.Find more headlines from Nora at Sandy & Nora Talk Politics podcast feed.Help us continue producing radically independent news and in-depth analysis by following us and becoming a monthly sustainer.Sign up for our newsletterLike us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterDonate to support this podcast

The International Criminal Court (ICC) announced arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, accusing them of crimes tied to Israel's defense operations in Gaza. Why should supporters of Israel—regardless of political views—reject these accusations?  Belle Yoeli, AJC's Chief Advocacy Officer, explains why the ICC's charges are not only baseless but also undermine justice, distort international law, and fuel harmful narratives following the deadliest antisemitic attack since the Holocaust. Listen – AJC Podcasts: The Forgotten Exodus: with Hen Mazzig, Einat Admony, and more. People of the Pod:  What President-Elect Trump's Nominees Mean for Israel, Antisemitism, and More What the Election Results Mean for Israel and the Jewish People The Jewish Vote in Pennsylvania: What You Need to Know Go Deeper – AJC Analysis: Statement: American Jewish Committee Appalled by ICC's Issuance of Arrest Warrants Against Israelis Explainer: What You Need to Know About the ICC and the Israel-Hamas War Follow People of the Pod on your favorite podcast app, and learn more at AJC.org/PeopleofthePod You can reach us at: peopleofthepod@ajc.org If you've appreciated this episode, please be sure to tell your friends, and rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. __ Transcript of Conversation with Belle Yoeli: Manya Brachear Pashman:   The International Criminal Court announced on Thursday that it issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister. You have Galant as well as Hamas terrorist Mohammed, if the Court said it had found reasonable grounds to believe that Netanyahu and Galant quote, each bear criminal responsibility for starvation as a method of warfare and crimes against humanity, end quote. All tied to Israel's military operations in Gaza focused on defeating Hamas terrorists, securing the return of the 101 remaining hostages and preventing more attacks.  Here to talk about why the court is prosecuting Israel's leaders for its defense operation after the country suffered the deadliest antisemitic attack since the Holocaust, and why that's dangerous, is Belle Yoeli, AJC's Chief advocacy officer. Belle, welcome to People of the Pod. Belle Yoeli:   Thanks so much, Manya. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Do Belle, why have warrants been issued for Netanyahu and Gallant. Belle Yoeli:   Right. So first and foremost, I just want to make it abundantly clear, and it really needs to be said, that this decision is absolutely outrageous. It's a gross distortion of international law and so many other things. It undermines the credibility of the court, and it fuels a lot of malicious lies about the state of Israel and its self defensive activities in Gaza since October 7. I will share the Court's reasoning for the warrants, and you alluded to it, quote, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least the eighth of October, until at least the 20th of May 2024. The court claims they found reasonable grounds that Netanyahu and Gallant, again, quote, bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others. The war crime of starvation as a method of warfare, and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution and other inhumane acts. That's the direct quote, obviously very hard to read. And of course, AJC fundamentally rejects these claims, as do the United States and many, many leading international law and warfare experts. This is just a total and complete failure of justice. Manya Brachear Pashman:   So why should supporters of Israel stand firmly against this accusation, no matter what their political views are? In other words, if they're not fans of Netanyahu, but they are ardent supporters of Israel, why should they stand firm against this?  Belle Yoeli:   Yeah, it's an important question, and we have to be clear. I mean, the court has politicized this by sort of taking this unprecedented action. But this is not about political issues, it's not about Netanyahu or Gallant. This is about the truth. This is about right and wrong, and the claims that are being made here are so outrageous and malicious. I mean, Israel is not intentionally starving Palestinian civilians or committing crimes. It just doesn't make sense.  If it were, it would not be facilitating tons and tons of aid into the Gaza Strip every day, not to mention polio vaccines. I mean, the list goes on and on. Israel, like any other country, is defending itself, and not just in Gaza against Hamas, but on seven fronts, including Hezbollah and Lebanon, against Iranian proxies.  And look, we've said it from the beginning, since Israel responded in this self defensive way, and we'll say it again: civilians die in war, and that is a terrible, horrible thing. But Israel is fighting its war in Gaza in response to Hamas' actions on October 7. It's about bringing the hostages home and preventing the ability of Hamas to attack Israeli civilians. And it's been said by many experts that Israel is conducting itself in this war in an unprecedented manner, in a positive way. And I know that's hard for people to grasp, because, again, people have died, Palestinians have died, and, yes, civilians have died, and that's terrible. But that doesn't take away from the fact that Israel is trying to prevent civilian death and why it's fighting this war, and none of that has to do with intentionally harming civilians. Manya Brachear Pashman:   So I want to back up here and talk about who is actually pressing these charges, who is actually issuing these warrants and making these accusations in this case. For people who may not be familiar or they may be confused between the International Criminal Court and another international court, the International Court of Justice, which has a separate case against Israel and is connected to the United Nations. So what is the International Criminal Court? How is it different than the ICJ? Belle Yoeli:   So you mean, not everybody is a legal scholar? It's quite confusing, and I'm grateful for my colleagues who have really helped us try to explain this to everyone, and I'll try to break it down for you as simply as I can. So the ICC is an independent, international judicial tribunal. It's based in the Hague, and it was created in 2002 by the Rome Statute.  And that's a treaty that essentially spells out what crimes this specific body, the ICC, should investigate and adjudicate when it can. And the ICC's jurisdiction is essentially that it can prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and aggression. That's four categories.  And it's allowed to prosecute not just state actors, but also non-state actors. And when you think about the ICC, as colleagues have explained to me, you really are supposed to think about it as a court of last resort. So when you think about national legal systems, and respecting the right that sovereign states have their own courts and that should be respected, the ICC would step in when an important crime or a crime did not get prosecuted. That's what this body is meant for, and again, trying to respect sovereign states. Now, by contrast, the ICJ is the judicial arm of the UN, the United Nations, and the ICJ is supposed to settle legal disputes between states, and it also can issue opinions upon requests by UN entities. So there are two different bodies, two very different purposes. Manya Brachear Pashman:   So is Israel a member of the ICC? Belle Yoeli:   So Israel is not a member of the ICC. And this is actually sort of interesting. Israel was involved in drafting the Rome Statute that I mentioned, that created the ICC, that treaty. But things got a little complicated, which is not so surprising when you hear why. Essentially, the ICC, as we discussed, was intended to focus on these most heinous crimes, right?  But eventually the entity was urged by several Arab countries, and the majority of the countries that are party to the ICC agreed, to add as one of the categories of things that can be investigated and prosecuted, the transfer of civilians into occupied territory. And so if you hear that, I'm sure a ping goes off, obviously based on Israel and its situation and dynamics in the region. Israel took this as a sign that countries were aiming to distort the purpose of the body and really to try to just prosecute Israelis for actions in the West Bank, for example. So it ended up refraining from joining. Manya Brachear Pashman:   So now, countries cannot be prosecuted by the ICC, right? I mean, I understand that Israel as a country can't be prosecuted, but Israelis can be, and that's why the warrants issued named Netanyahu and Gallant. Belle Yoeli:   So technically, the body is supposed to go after individuals. But the question here, of the warrants is about jurisdiction, right? And clearly there's a disagreement. The Israelis, the United States and others have said that the ICC has no jurisdiction over, you know, for the warrants they've issued. And AJC agrees.  The Palestinians and actually, the court itself have said that it's based on certain technicalities which are actually quite complicated, and you can read about in our explainer on our website about this subject, that there is jurisdiction. But for me, the thing that is most clear here is that as we reference, Israel has a strong, independent judiciary, and even when it comes to the conflict. Most recent conflicts is October 7, Israel's own military Advocate General has in fact, opened dozens of investigations into incidents.  So when you consider the fact that Israel has a mechanism for investigating things that are happening in Gaza, that in itself, should tell everyone that the ICC has no jurisdiction here based on its own treaty. So yes, these warrants were issued, but from our perspective, there's really no jurisdiction. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Okay, so would you say the fog of war makes this almost impossible to adjudicate, or is this, in your eyes, an open and shut case? Is it abundantly clear that Israeli leaders have avoided committing these crimes they're accused of? Belle Yoeli:   So, I mean, to me, it's open and shut for a few reasons, right? We've mentioned them. One, the ICC has no jurisdiction. Two, the claims are, of the crimes are, are false and really offensive. And, you know, there is, of course, this phrase, the fog of war, and there's always fog in war. But this is really not what it's about. The travesty in all of this is that Israel does so much in an unprecedented environment that shows that the claims that are being made are untrue.  So, yes, the technicalities, yes, there's no jurisdiction. The claims are offensive. But it's more than that. This is so clearly being politicized, because, yes, people are upset about what's happening and the conflict, and we understand that the entire world is reacting, but it's just not true. It's just about truth here, and what the court is suggesting is simply not true, and really targeting Israel in a way that is against justice and is really unheard of. Manya Brachear Pashman:   So here in America, we are amid a leadership transition. Has the response differed between the Biden administration and the incoming Trump administration? Belle Yoeli:   So from what we've seen so far, I mean, the Biden administration and incoming administration officials from the Trump administration have both spoken out and both rejected the decision outright. You'll see, and I think we'll see in the coming days, there are differences of opinion also in Congress about how to deal with this action. And this been, this has been in conversation, you know, discussion for months when this was first raised, that this could possibly happen, questions around sanctions and different actions that can be taken. But I think we'll know a lot more about concrete potential proposals and next steps in the coming days. Manya Brachear Pashman:   And what about the international community? Belle Yoeli:   You know, it's interesting, at this point, when we're as of this recording, the international response has actually been quite muted, and I think that's because countries are trying to balance upholding the respect for the court and the idea of the court and its jurisdiction with this really outrageous decision that I think many of them know is is false and wrong and has really bad implications for what the court is meant to do. You know, some have been quite clear. Just to name a few, Argentina and Paraguay spoke out forcefully. Some responses have been a bit more murky. I think, trying to thread that needle that I mentioned, like the United Kingdom had a pretty murky response. And actually, the EU high representative who's thankfully on his way out, Joseph Burrell, really fully embraced the decision in a sort of grotesque way. But this isn't new for him. He's fairly problematic on these types of issues. So we'll see how other countries react. You know, more things are in play, and I'm sure Israel and the United States are having close conversations with allies. I think the US even alluded to that, and we'll have a better sense of what's to come soon. Manya Brachear Pashman:   And so what does this mean for Israel and for the ongoing Israel-Hamas war? Belle Yoeli:   I mean, I don't have a crystal ball. I can say, look, it remains to be seen what will happen next. I think countries who are party to the ICC need to do the right thing. They need to reject the jurisdiction and really refuse to enforce the warrants. That's the most important piece here. That's what we're hoping to see.  I think we'll see that international pressure likely be applied by the United States and others. But the bigger picture here, I mean, again, it speaks to the travesty that I spoke about before. It's this larger attempt to delegitimize Israel and really discredit and slander Israel, I would even go so far to say, is just unjust, and it fuels all of the disinformation that we're seeing.  And what does that lead to? It leads to hate. It leads to hate against Israelis, and let's be honest, it puts Jews around the world at risk at a time when there's already surging antisemitism. This isn't new. Look at what happened in Amsterdam.  So more broadly, this just, this hits. This is an issue and so problematic in so many ways, and it just, it does so much harm and the ideals of democracy and the ideas of justice, it's really unprecedented and unforgivable. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Do you think it gets in the way of bringing the hostages home? Belle Yoeli:   Unfortunately, the reality is that it's been difficult enough as it is to bring the hostages home, and we just haven't seen movement in negotiations. And obviously we're praying for that every day. I couldn't tell you how this will impact that. I don't, I don't see an immediate connection. I think, look, we need to be clear that every action like this contributes to a feeling in Israel of already, sort of, as they say in conflict negotiation or resolution speak. like a siege mentality, right? Israelis feel under attack. The government likely feels under attack, and so it certainly doesn't help when Israel is trying to defend itself, to carry out war and to bring the hostages home, it certainly doesn't help, but how it will affect actual negotiations, I couldn't say. Manya Brachear Pashman:   Belle, thank you so much for sharing your insights and trying to explain this to our listeners. Belle Yoeli:   Thank you so much for having me.    

Výtah Respektu: Souhrn dne a rozhovor s Tomášem Lindnerem

GOOD EVENING: The show begins in the grocery store after three years of prices spiking. 1930 Mott Street First Hour: - 9-9:15 - Segment on how it was inflation that drove markets, with Liz Peek of The Hill and Fox News. - 9:15-9:30 - Segment on Trump and regulation, again with Liz Peek. - 9:30-9:45 - Segment on how the EU is not ready for a Trump return, with Judy Dempsey of the Carnegie Endowment. - 9:45-10:00 - Segment on Berlin not being ready for Trump, also with Judy Dempsey. Second Hour: - 10-10:15 - "State Thinking" segment on Trump and the EU in wartime, with Mary Kissel, former Senior Adviser to the Secretary of State. - 10:15-10:30 - "State Thinking" segment on Trump and the Xi threat to Taiwan, again with Mary Kissel. - 10:30-10:45 - Segment on Galant's exit from the Israeli government, with Jonathan Schanzer of FDD. - 10:45-11:00 - Segment on whether Iran will "shoot again", also with Jonathan Schanzer. Third Hour: - 11:00-11:15 - Segment on Taiwan and Trump, with Stephen Yates of the Heritage Foundation, and Gordon Chang. - 11:15-11:30 - Segment on China's "lawfare" against AstraZeneca, with Andrew Collier of Orient Capital Research. - 11:30-11:45 - Segment on China's improved "Guam Killer" missiles, with Toshi Yoshihara of CSBA, and Gordon Chang. - 11:45-12:00 - Segment on North Korean war-fighting rumors, with David Maxwell of the Center for Asia Pacific Strategy, and Gordon Chang. Fourth Hour: - 12-12:15 - "King Charles Report" on the King continuing his work, with Gregory Copley. - 12:15-12:30 - Segment on the Abraham Accords helping to end the Tehran regime, also with Gregory Copley. - 12:30-12:45 - Segment on the uncertainty in Ukraine after Trump's victory, with Colonel Jeff McCausland (Ret.). - 12:45-1:00 - Segment on Trump and the Department of Defense, again with Colonel Jeff McCausland.

What do the results of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, a sweeping victory for President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect J.D. Vance, mean for the U.S. Jewish community and Israel? How did the Jewish community vote? What are the top takeaways from the Senate and the House elections? Get caught up on all the latest election data points and analysis in this week's episode, featuring Ron Kampeas, JTA's Washington Bureau Chief and guest hosted by Julie Fishman Rayman, AJC's Managing Director of Policy and Political Affairs. AJC is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization. AJC neither supports nor opposes candidates for elective office. The views and opinions expressed by guests do not necessarily reflect the views or position of AJC. AJC's Policy Priorities: AJC Congratulates President-Elect Donald J. Trump Listen – AJC Podcasts: The Forgotten Exodus: with Hen Mazzig, Einat Admony, and more. People of the Pod:  The Jewish Vote in Pennsylvania: What You Need to Know Sinwar Eliminated: What Does This Mean for the 101 Hostages Still Held by Hamas? From Doña Gracia to Deborah Lipstadt: What Iconic Jewish Women Can Teach Us Today Follow People of the Pod on your favorite podcast app, and learn more at AJC.org/PeopleofthePod You can reach us at: peopleofthepod@ajc.org If you've appreciated this episode, please be sure to tell your friends, and rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Transcript: Julie Fishman Rayman:  Hello, I'm Julie Fishman Rayman:, AJC's managing director of policy and political affairs. Today, I have the pleasure of guest hosting people of the PA and speaking with Ron Kampeas, JTA's Washington bureau chief, to discuss the results and the implications of the 2024 US presidential election as the nonpartisan global advocacy organization for the Jewish people, AJC congratulates Donald J Trump on his election as the 47th president of the United States and Senator J.D. Vance as vice president. AJC looks forward to working with the president-elect and his administration on the domestic and foreign policy concerns that are AJC advocacy priorities to learn more about our policy priorities for the incoming administration. Head to the link in our show notes as a reminder. AJC is a 501(c)3 non partisan, not for profit organization. AJC neither supports nor opposes candidates for elected office. Ron, welcome to people of the pod. Thank you for being here Ron Kampeas:  Of course. Julie Fishman Rayman:  Well, I'd like to start in asking you if you have a sense about the Jewish vote, because there have been a number of different exit polls, which, I guess, not surprisingly, because exit polls are what they are, say vastly different things. There are some that say it's the biggest Jewish vote in support for a Democratic candidate ever, and then also the highest percentage ever for a Republican candidate. What do we know to be true? And what would you sort of be looking at in terms of, you know, as we're examining this moving forward? What are we looking for? Ron Kampeas:  So first of all, I know I've seen those very extreme assessments as well, and I know what they're based on, and even when what based on what they're based on, and we, I'll talk about that too. That's just not correct. So they're talking about a 79% turnout, according to a poll the consortium of a number of organizations like the CNN and the New York Times. And that poll is not reliable yet. It does show 79% and think 21% in other words, an even split. Nobody seemed to have voted for at least among the Jews for third party candidates. And I'm not sure what number of Jews who were included in that poll were. I mean, it's a vast, vast poll. They do talk to a lot of people, but even they will say, and I think they put it on their things, that it's just preliminary, the more reliable analysis is considered to be the one that came out of the Fox AP analysis that showed 66% 67% for Paris, 32% 31% for Trump. And I think that's what the Trump people are talking about in terms of the highest for Republicans. It's just not the highest for Republican. I think if you count in the margin of error, that's not even like recently the highest for a Republican. Nothing's changed in the last four years. I think what it is showing is that whereas Republicans, when I started at JTA in 2004 they were happy to get 25% they've gone up from 19% with George W Bush in 2020 to 25% with John Kerry a few years later, now they can comfortably say they're getting about 30% of the Jewish community. People love to attach everything that happens to the very current politics of the day. So however you count it, nothing seems to have changed. Julie Fishman Rayman:  So interesting, because for I think a lot of Jews around America, we feel as though so much has changed. But when you go to the voting booth, Jews consistently aren't necessarily thinking just about either Israel or antisemitism, AJC does a survey looking at American Jewish opinion, not every year, but almost every year. And we did it in June, and asked questions about political affiliation. Who are you going to vote for? And one of the things that we asked was, what drives your vote, and foreign policy is always low down on the list. On election night, CNN asked that same question, of course, to all Americans, and I think 4% said that their vote was driven by foreign policy. Has there been a moment where the American Jewish vote is more focused on issues that feel perhaps a bit more parochial. Ron Kampeas:  No, certainly within the Orthodox subset, and it's always difficult to tell, because it's the smaller the subset, the bigger the margin of error. But when there's consistency over time and survey after survey after survey, I think you can conclude that, yes, Orthodox Jews do attach. Of more importance to the US Israel relationship and how it's manifesting, how they're perceiving it. The only time that a Democrat, at least since FDR, I think, a Democrat, didn't receive a majority of the Jewish vote was Jimmy Carter, who, in 1980 got a plurality of the Jewish one, I think, about 45%. People sort of conflate things in their head. In his post presidency, Carter became very identified with being very critical of Israel, and it's true, in 1980 he'd had difficult relationships with Menachem Begin, but he brokered the most important peace treaty in Israeli history. He saved a lot of lives. So I don't think people were feeling bad about Carter in 1980 because of Israel. I like to tell people, Jews are like everybody else. You know it's true that a majority of us vote for Democrats, and there are other subsets where, like a majority vote for Republican more majority for Democrats, but we vote for the same reasons as everybody else. Our votes will get more enthusiastic for a Democrat on one circumstance, just like everybody else's will, or might get less enthusiastic just like everybody else's will. We're susceptible to the same things. Julie Fishman Rayman:  It's really interesting. So at this moment, there's so much Monday morning quarterbacking happening, and I don't want to look too far in the rear view, but I do want to ask you for your take on this question of, would the result have been different had the Vice President selected Shapiro, Governor, Shapiro from Pennsylvania, as her running mate. Ron Kampeas:  Maybe it's hard to say vice presidents have had such a little impact on nominations. But on the other hand, Pennsylvania was close enough, and Shapiro is popular enough that perhaps it might have made the difference. She might have had Pennsylvania, and then if she had Pennsylvania, I don't know, she would have gotten to 270 but you know, Nevada and Arizona are still being counted. They might still go in her column. If they do go in her column, although I don't think they will, I think it looks like they're going to go into Trump's column if Nevada and Arizona go into her column and she missed out on Pennsylvania, you could say that her decision to go with Tim Walz instead of Josh Shapiro was faithful. On the other hand, everybody's a cynic. Nobody actually believes anything anybody says. But I tried to get away from that. I try not to be too much of a cynic. And when Josh Shapiro said afterwards that he had second thoughts about taking other thing because he's he's like a hugely successful governor so far in Pennsylvania is this is two years into his first term. You know, if I'm Josh Shapiro, I'm thinking about my legacy, and I'm thinking about running for president in the future and two years, just, yeah, I'm not going to make an impact in Pennsylvania in just two years. If I'm the 60% governor who can get Republicans to vote for me in the middle of the state, I'm thinking two terms will make me like, well, you know, get me a statue in some building at one point, there's this whole narrative that there was an anti semitic pushback. It was an anti semitic pushback against Shapiro. It was anti-Israel at times. I really believe it did cross over antisemitism. I'm not sure that that had the effect on the Harris campaign in terms of its decision making. She clicked with Tim Wallz. Shapiro wasn't so eager. Shapiro was going to be a co president. Walls wanted to be a vice president. He made that very clear. He had no intentions of ever running for the presidency. So if you're a Harris, do you want to have a Dan Quayle, or do you want to have a Dick Cheney kind of thing? You know as somebody who who's prone to take over, or somebody who's prone to do what needs to be done to be vice president. And obviously she preferred the latter. Julie Fishman Rayman:  It's a great analogy. Can we talk for a minute about sort of Jewish representation in Congress where Israel was on the ballot? What are your perceptions there? Ron Kampeas:  I think that it might have made a difference in Mark 17th, where Mike Lawler defeated Mondair Jones. Mondair Jones was perceived when he first ran into 2020, and he was elected. He was perceived initially as somebody who would be very different from Nita Lowey, who he was replacing because she's a very solid, long time pro-Israel and an AJC board member and an AJC board member. He actually declared before she retired, so he was a little bit confrontational with her, which happens, obviously, I don't know if Israel came up in that equation, though young progressive people thought he'd be a squatter, but he wasn't. In his two years in Congress, he wasn't a member of the squad, and he went out of his way to align with the pro-Israel community, and this because it was so important in his district. But Lawler is just like he's been. He's a freshman, but he's been out front. He's been very good at cultivating the Jewish people in his district. And he's not just led on a number of Israel issues, but he's always made sure to do it in a bipartisan way, partnering with Jared Moskowitz in Florida, or Josh got him or in New Jersey, and you know, that might have helped him in the district. It was a close race. He won by a close margin. So I think maybe that was definitely a factor there. I think that one of the group's decision desk that declares winners just declared for Jackie Rosen in Nevada. She's been reelected, according to them, but we'll wait. We'll see if and when AP calls it. But again, a state with a substantial Jewish population, she is, like, one of the premier Democrats. She's Jewish, but she also is like, very, very upfront about Israel. She co chairs an antisemitism Task Force. She has a bill that would designate a domestic antisemitism coordinator. So in such a close race or such close margins with the Jewish community, that's actually much larger than the margin that might have helped put her over the top. On the other side, you. Know, you have Michigan, which might have also, like we looked at Pennsylvania and Josh Shapiro, Michigan also might have cost Kamala Harris the presidency because of her support for Israel, because, you know, President Trump managed to peel away Muslim American and Arab American voters in in Michigan, in a kind of a weird slate of hand, because he said that he would be more pro their issue than Kamala Harris was, even though he's more pro Netanyahu, definitely than Kamala Harris is. But also, there were third party voters, people who voted for Jill Stein. Julie Fishman Rayman:  Pretty significant numbers for Jill Stein from Michigan. Ron Kampeas:  Pretty significant numbers for Jill Stein. But Elissa Slotkin over the top, very pro Israel, centrist Democrat Jewish. Very much a foreign policy, you know, specialist. She came out of the CIA and the Defense Department. Also very partisan. She was meeting with red constituents, like veterans, and she was doing a good job of it. She had that appeal. And I think that's why she ran for Senate. I think that's where Democrats are excited to have her run for Senate. And then October 7 happened, and she had to navigate a very difficult situation in her state, which has a substantial Jewish community, has an even bigger Muslim American and Arab American community. She had meetings with both leaders. She put out sensitive statements after the meetings. I think one of the most interesting sort of developments with her is that Rashida Tlaib, the Palestinian American Congresswoman attacked Dana Nessel for prosecuting people who were violent were allegedly violent at protests. She put out a statement that, without saying it was because Dana Ness was Jewish, she was said that Dana Nessel had other sort of considerations. When she brought these prosecutions, Dana Nessel outright accused her of antisemitism, and then Rashida Tlaib was the subject of a lot of Islamophobic, anti Palestinian vitriol. And it was interesting because there were two letters that went out at the time from Congress members, one condemning anything that insinuated that Dana Nessel had dual loyalties, or anything like that, and one condemning the anti Islamic rhetoric that Rashida clade faced, and the only person who signed both letters was Alyssa Slotkin. That was interesting. Julie Fishman Rayman:  I want to to turn a little bit if we can, to the expectations for for the next administration, even for the next Congress. When we last spoke, right after the Republican National Convention, JD Vance had been selected as the running mate, and you and I, we talked about what that means for a Trump foreign policy in the next administration. Will it go in a more isolationist direction, more aligning with JD Vance's world view? What do you think now and what might we expect? Ron Kampeas:  But still a potential for sure, there are names being rooted about for Secretary of State. One of them is Rick Grinnell, who's completely a Trumpist, who will do what he wants, his former Acting CIA director. And the other is Marco Rubio, gave one of the best speeches at the convention, I thought, and who is very close to the pro Israel community, who's an internationalist, but who has tailored his rhetoric to be more to make sure he doesn't antagonize Donald Trump. He was, you know, he was a came close to being the vice presidential pick himself. I mean, if Marco Rubio becomes Secretary of State, I think that's a good sign for internationalists. I mean, you know, Israel has kind of a buffer, because the Republican Party is very pro Israel. And there are people like JD Vance says, who say, you know, Israel is the exception when it comes to what I think about pulling United States back from the world, even though he says it's not so much the exception. And then there are people like Marco Rubio who are internationalists. Does Marco Rubio get to run an independent foreign policy? That would be very good news, I think, for for internationalists, if, if Donald Trump doesn't get in his way. But I don't know if that that happens. There's a view of pro israelism that says internationalism is necessary. I always like to say when a pack used to have its policy conferences, and it's a shame it doesn't any more, they would have a little brief talk before on Tuesday morning, before going up to the Hill, they would have, like, some prominent Senator come out and give a rah rah speech, and then like, three officials would come out on the stage Howard core, late Richard Fishman, and Esther Kurz. And Esther Kurz had handled Congressional Relations, and they would talk about the three items they were bringing up the Hill, usually two laws in a letter or a resolution or something like that.  And she would always say, and this was like the one moment like they would sort of reveal this. They'd be very candid about this. You have to push not for assistance for Israel, but foreign assistance generally, because there is no such thing as sort of singling out Israel and saying, Okay, we're going to take care of Israel, but nobody else in the world that it's all it's all interconnected, and it's such a true thing now, because you can say, you know, let's just cut off Ukraine. But if you're cut off Ukraine, you're bolstering Putin. If you're bolstering Putin, you're bolstering somebody who has a substantial and military alliance with Iran, if you're bolstering Iran, that is not good for Israel. And it's like it's kind of circuitous to get there, but it's also very substantive point. I think those are the things the pro Israel community is going to be looking at with genuine concern. Julie Fishman Rayman:  Indeed, it's all about sort of the strength of the American global leadership regime. And when you start to whittle away at one, the overall package ends up being weaker. Speaking of Israel, I can't speak to you this week and not ask you about the news out of Israel, about Netanyahu firing the defense secretary, gallant and what that means. And also, if we can extrapolate, if we can prognosticate what might happen vis a vis Israel in this lame duck session, while we still have Biden as president, but moving through the transition towards a future Trump administration. Ron Kampeas:  Yeah, you know, there a lot of Israelis are actually worried about that. Like, Oh, Biden's gonna take his frustrations out on VB in the lame duck doesn't have anything stopping him. I don't think that's going to happen. I think what's interesting is, like, you had a couple of instances in American history where a lame duck president used the fact that he didn't care, you know, what anybody thought of him, to push something through in 1988 Ronald Reagan recognized the PLO because it's something George H W Bush wanted him to do. George H W Bush wanted to push like more Israel Palestinian peace he did with the Madrid Conference, but he didn't want to be the one to invite the PLO into the room, so he got Ronald Reagan to do it in his last two months in office. In 2016 Barack Obama allowed through a Security Council resolution of that condemned the settlements. The United States didn't vote for it, but it also didn't veto it. That really kind of shook Israel up. But was interesting. I've done the reporting on this. When he was taking advice, Should I, should we vote for the resolution? Should we veto it, or should we just allow it through? There were people voicing opinions on all sides. Joe Biden and Jack Lew, who was then the Treasury Secretary, is now the ambassador to Israel, both said, veto it. Don't let it through. Don't let it through because, partly because it's going to really upset our Jewish supporters. If you let it through, you're not going to be president anymore, but somebody in the room is going to probably try and be president. I think that Joe Biden still has that sense of responsibility. I could be wrong. You know, four years or a year of like, from his perspective, being very strongly supportive of Israel and not getting anything back. From Bibi, from his perspective, might have changed his mind. Something might occur now. But the question is, like, you can tell Israel if they hit anything, but if they hit, if they hit anything, if they elevate it at all, they're going to need US assistance. And Trump hasn't said he's going to give that. Biden has. Biden's proven he's going to give it. So you've got two months of a president who will, who will back up Israel with American might, and then you have a president who has isolationist tendencies and who doesn't want to get involved with wars for another four years. Julie Fishman Rayman:  Is there anything else that you're hearing, perhaps, from the Israeli perspective, about Gallant departure, and what that signal? Ron Kampeas:  I think, that Netanyahu, you know, he's just trying to keep his government intact. Gallant is very vocal in opposing or in supporting drafting the ultra orthodox the Haredi orthodox Netanyahu government relies on Haredi orthodox parties. So there's that he's also facing a kind of spy scandal from his own circle. Just a weird, weird story. Somebody who's in his circle is alleged to have tried to help Netanyahu politically by leaking highly classified documents and altering them as well to foreign news outlets. The allegation is that whatever the guy's motivation was, he's actually put Israel at risk. So Netanyahu is suddenly in a position of facing allegations that he put Israel at risk. Now he's faced a lot of scandals in his time. Israelis have a high level of tolerance for people who are alleged to have skimmed off the top, alleged to have helped themselves, and that's what the scandals are about. They have no tolerance for anybody who puts Israel's security at risk. So if this comes back to Netanyahu that could be more damage than than any other scandal that he's endured so far and so notably, I think, you know, when he was firing Galant, he said he accused Galant of leaking information, although, I mean, what he was seemed to be referring to was Galant didn't leak anything. Galant openly said that he disagreed with Netanyahu on certain tactics, and that, you know Netanyahu is casting is putting Israel at risk, which is not to say that Netanyahu is necessarily going to be implicated by the scandal, but it's certainly not of a piece with leaking, actually classified documents that reveal methods and sources can put Israel's intelligence gathering methods at risk. Julie Fishman Rayman:  As always, there's so much more to the story, right? Ron Kampeas:  Yeah, yeah. There always is. Julie Fishman Rayman:  Ron, we could probably talk for a very long time about the American elections and what's going on in Israel and the degrees of various scandals and how populations will take them, and what the future of our country in the region looks like. But I know that you're very busy, especially this week, and I just want to say how grateful we are they always make time for AJC and for people of the pod. Ron Kampeas:  Of course.

Galant demitido, Trump ganhando eleições americanas. Quais vão ser os efeitos em Israel, na região e no mundo

Canadian journalist Nora Loreto reads the latest headlines for Wednesday, November 6, 2024.TRNN has partnered with Loreto to syndicate and share her daily news digest with our audience. Tune in every morning to the TRNN podcast feed to hear the latest important news stories from Canada and worldwide.Find more headlines from Nora at Sandy & Nora Talk Politics podcast feed.Help us continue producing radically independent news and in-depth analysis by following us and becoming a monthly sustainer.Sign up for our newsletterLike us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterDonate to support this podcast

In this conversation, Ryan Staley and Greg Galant discuss the integration of AI in public relations, the evolution of podcasting, and the opportunities that AI presents for innovation in business. Greg shares his experiences from starting a podcast in 2005 to leveraging AI tools in his company, Muckrack. They explore personal and team use cases of AI, the challenges of adopting new technologies, and the importance of fostering a culture of innovation within organizations. Takeaways AI is revolutionizing the way businesses operate. The early adoption of technology can lead to significant opportunities. Creating niche content is easier with AI tools. Personal experimentation with AI can lead to innovative solutions. Encouraging team members to share AI use cases fosters a culture of innovation. AI can enhance productivity and efficiency in various tasks. Understanding the adoption cycle is crucial for technology integration. Patience is key when encouraging companies to adopt new technologies. AI tools can simplify everyday tasks and decision-making processes. Building a strong online presence is essential for business growth. Sound Bites "AI is unlocking so many new doors." "I would just start making lots of podcasts." "It's a really exciting time." --- Join 3,000+ readers getting weekly practical guidance to scale themselves and their companies using Artificial Intelligence and Revenue Cheat Codes.   Explore becoming Superhuman here: ⁠https://superhumanrevenue.beehiiv.com/

In this conversation, Ryan Staley interviews Greg Gallant, Co-founder and CEO of Muckrack, discussing the company's innovative approach to public relations through AI integration. They explore Muckrack's growth journey, its business model, and how PR professionals can leverage the platform to enhance their media coverage and relationships with journalists. The discussion also highlights the importance of identifying newsworthy stories and effectively targeting media outreach. Takeaways Muckrack has grown sustainably, focusing on profitability. The platform serves as a comprehensive tool for PR professionals. AI is being integrated to automate tedious PR tasks. Identifying newsworthy stories is crucial for effective PR. Targeted outreach to journalists increases chances of coverage. Muckrack helps users find the right media contacts easily. The importance of customizing pitches for journalists. AI can assist in generating initial drafts for outreach. Understanding industry trends can enhance PR strategies. Building relationships with journalists is key to successful PR. Sound Bites "We're approaching 300 employees, we're still profitable." "It's like a software platform for the PR department." "AI can take the busy work out of it." --- Join 3,000+ readers getting weekly practical guidance to scale themselves and their companies using Artificial Intelligence and Revenue Cheat Codes.   Explore becoming Superhuman here: https://superhumanrevenue.beehiiv.com/

When Marie and Pierre Curie discovered radium in 1898, the chemical element was quickly adopted by manufacturers for its luminescent properties that would go on to be used in, among other things, the painting of clock faces, watches, and instrument panels, allowing them to be seen in the dark. At the time, the introduction of radioluminescent materials into manufacturing was hailed as a scientific solution to an age-old frustration, but it didn't take long before that solution was shown to have terrible consequences. As a radioactive element, radium is highly toxic to humans, particularly when ingested or inhaled. While it seemed unlikely that anyone would ingest or inhale the radium used to paint a clockface, this fact posed a serious problem for the largely female factory workers whose job it was to paint the dials. These “Radium Girls,” as they would come to be known, not only spent most of their day in close proximity to the paint, but also employed a technique in which they frequently wet their paintbrushes with their mouths, consuming small amounts of radium in the process. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, hundreds of young women working in at least three radium dial factories in the United States suffered deadly radiation poisoning as a result of working so closely with radium, all without any safety protocols and completely unaware of the dangers. After dozens of deaths, a group of factory workers successfully sued their employers for damages, exposing the widespread disregard for worker safety. While the suits were generally a major victory for the American labor movement, it was ultimately hard-won and little comfort to those who would die within a few years.Thank you to the incredible Dave White of Bring Me the Axe Podcast for research!ReferencesCamden Courier-Post. 1928. "Woman radium victim offers living body to aid in search for cure." Courier-Post, May 29: 1.eGov Newswire. 2021. "Menedez leads colleagues in introducing senate resolution to honor the lives and legacy of the 'Radium Girls'." eGov Newswire, June 26.Evening Courier. 1927. "Radium poison victims want damage suit limits raised." Evening Courier, July 19: 2.Galant, Debbie. 1996. "Living with a radium nightmare." New York Times, September 29: NJ1.Lang, Daniel. 1959. "A most valuable accident." New Yorker, April 24: 49.McAndrew, Tara McClellan. 2018. The Radium Girls: An Illinois Tragedy. January 25. Accessed July 8, 2024. https://www.nprillinois.org/equity-justice/2018-01-25/the-radium-girls-an-illinois-tragedy.Moore, Kate. 2017. The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women. New York, NY: Sourcebooks.New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. n.d. Radium Girls: The Story of US Radium's Superfund Site. Environmental Preservation Snapshot, Orange, NJ: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.New York Times. 1928. "Finds no bar to suit by radium victims." New York Times, May 23: 11.Prisco, Jacopo. 2017. "Radium Girls: The dark times of luminous watches." CNN, December 19.United Press. 1928. "Woman, dying by degrees, tells of symptoms of radium posioning." Courier-News, May 16: 6.—. 1928. "3 more are victims of radiun poisoning." Evening Courier, May 22: 1.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In Ep. 134 of Earned, Conor sits down with Gregory Galant, co-founder and CEO of innovative PR-software company Muck Rack and The Shorty Awards—the first award show to honor digital and social media content. To start, we dive into Greg's early adventures in podcasting before unpacking his role in reshaping the public relations landscape. Greg shares how his experience interviewing social media pioneers influenced his engagement with emerging platforms, leading to the viral success of the Shorty Awards and the inception of Muck Rack. Next, Greg explains how Muck Rack evolved from a free service for journalists into a comprehensive SaaS platform that revolutionized PR as the first-ever CRM for PR teams. We then discuss the intricacies of PR measurement, the importance of customer feedback, and the transformative potential of AI in the industry. To close the show, Greg shares what motivates him and how he finds fulfillment in creating tools that help professionals excel.   In this episode, you'll learn:  How Muck Rack's media database and coverage reporting help prove the value and impact of PR. How Muck Rack transformed the industry by creating the first-ever CRM for PR teams. How early adoption can lead to innovative platforms that meet evolving industry needs—like the Shorty Awards.   Resources: Muck Rack - https://muckrack.com/   Connect with the Guest: Gregory's LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/galant/   Connect with Conor Begley & CreatorIQ: Conor's LinkedIn - @conormbegley CreatorIQ LinkedIn - @creatoriq   Follow us on social: CreatorIQ YouTube - @TribeDynamics CreatorIQ Instagram - @creatoriq CreatorIQ TikTok - @creator.iq CreatorIQ Twitter - @CreatorIQ  

The media landscape is undergoing rapid and unprecedented transformations, driven significantly by the powerful influence of artificial intelligence, social media, and remote work. In an effort to understand modern journalism and predict its future trajectory, Greg Galant, CEO and Co-Founder of Muck Rack, joins host Steve Halsey to discuss Muck Rack's latest research, The State of Journalism 2024. They delve into emerging trends shaping the media industry and examine how these developments propel the sector forward amidst challenging times for professionals. We dive deeper into: Balancing the use of generative AI and human intelligence to curate superior contentThe essential elements of the perfect media pitch and why each pitch should always be tailoredHow providing immediacy and accuracy has propelled X to dominate the journalism spaceThe inseparable link between journalists and PR professionals

Haftbefehle gegen Israels Ministerpräsidenten und Hamas-Anführer Sinwar bei Internationalem Strafgerichtshof beantragt, US-Regierung empört über Antrag auf Haftbefehle gegen Netanyahu und Galant, Irans Präsident Raisi und Außenminister sterben bei Hubschrauberabsturz, Bürgerkrieg im Sudan: Helfer warnen vor humanitärer Katastrophe, Assange darf Berufung gegen Auslieferung an USA einlegen, EM 2024 in Deutschland: Millionenkosten für Spielorte, Frauen-Bundesliga: Ungeschlagene Bayern-Fußballerinnen erhalten Meisterschale, FC St. Pauli feiert Meistertitel in der 2. Bundesliga, Holstein Kiel feiert Aufstieg in die 1. Fußball-Bundesliga, Das Wetter Hinweis: Der Beitrag zur "Frauen-Bundesliga" darf aus rechtlichen Gründen nicht auf tagesschau.de gezeigt werden.

Your favorite 2NJB's are back with another recap! What we talked about: Galant's ambush on Bibi, the IDF's unclear objectives in Gaza, Israel's missed opportunities, and the price of defeating Hamas. The Eurovision Song Contest's anti-Israel bias, Ireland's terrifying entry, and the shocking performances. The state of American academia and the future of Jewish students on US campuses. Demographic shifts in Israel, the importance of Aliyah, and the upcoming Biden-Trump debate. Tune in and send us feedback!

Gregory Galant is the co-founder and CEO of Muck Rack, a platform enabling PR teams to work together to find the right journalists for their stories, send customized pitches, build meaningful relationships with the media, monitor news and quantify their impact. It's used by thousands of organizations, including Taco Bell, Pfizer, Golin, International Committee of the Red Cross, Knight Foundation, Kauffman Foundation and Penguin Random House. Muck Rack is also the solution of choice for journalists, who use Muck Rack's free, automatically updated portfolios to showcase their work and provide information about what stories they're looking for. Greg is also the co-creator and executive producer of The Shorty Awards, which honor the best of social media.  After being rejected by countless secret societies, Greg secured membership in Twitter and Instagram's exclusive first name club -- follow him at @gregory on both platforms.In this discussion Greg and I go deep on his experiences. Listen to our conversation to learn all about:➡️ Co-founder dynamics: The power of complementary skills and the dangers of too much similarity.➡️ Hiring: How to know when it's time to hire someone and what to look for when you're running lean. ➡️ Managing challenges: How to handle the stress that comes with building a startup - or doing anything challenging.Learn more about Greg's company Muck Rack | Website https://www.muckrack.comConnect with Alisa! Follow Alisa Cohn on Instagram: @alisacohn Twitter: @alisacohn Facebook: facebook.com/alisa.cohn LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alisacohn/ Website: http://www.alisacohn.com Download her 5 scripts for delicate conversations (and 1 to make your life better) Grab a copy of From Start-Up to Grown-Up by Alisa Cohn from AmazonLove the show? Subscribe, Rate, Review, Like, and Share!

What is wrong with the DIET industry today? There is massive confusion at every turn. That goes for the average person and even knowledgeable experts. Which way is the healthiest, most sustainable way to eat? Do I go Keto, Carnivore, Vegan, or something else?  Are elimination diets a good idea? What about detoxing or intermittent fasting? What works?! What do I do?!! No wonder why people are so incredibly confused about which road to travel to find optimal and long-lasting health.  Information OVERLOAD. Today on the SBD podcast we have two of the brightest minds in the world of nutrition when it comes to making sound nutritional choices, the founders of BiOptimizers, Matt Gallant and Wade Lightheart. We discuss all these topics and more as we dive into their latest seminal work, The Ultimate Nutrition Bible, possibly the greatest nutrition resource available today! Matt Gallant is a kinesiologist with a degree in the Science of Physical Activity and the CEO/Co-Founder of BIOptimizers. He has been a strength and conditioning coach for multiple pro-athletes, a self-defense instructor, and has over 18 years' experience formulating supplements. He has been successfully following a mostly ketogenic diet for over 30 years. He is also a serial entrepreneur who has built over 14 profitable companies. Wade T. Lightheart is a Certified Sports Nutritionist Advisor and president/director of education and co-founder of BIOptimizers. As a plant-based and drug-free athlete for more than two decades, Wade is a three-time National Natural Bodybuilding Champion who competed in both the IFBB Mr. Universe and the INBA Natural Olympia by the age of 31. At the age of 50, Wade came out of retirement to win the Open Men's and Grand Master's Categories at the INBA Ironman International, then competed at The PNBA Natural Olympia. Six months later, Wade successfully ran his first marathon in four hours.   "Is your diet producing the result you want? Is it keeping you healthy? And can you sustain it over a long period of time? That's all that matters." - BiOptimizers Matt Galant & Wade Lightheart     Time Stamps   1:13 –  Welcome to the ‘Strong by Design' podcast 3:01 - Meet today's special guests, Matt Galant & Wade Lightheart 7:02 - Matt & Wade's advice on how to overcome eating frustrations 11:35 - Discover what prompted them to write 'The Ultimate Nutrition Bible' 16:31 - Correcting the Misunderstanding: What is a healthy diet? 24:27 - Two main camps of Nutrition: Fits your macros camp & Evil food camp 26:53 - Wade on restrictive diets and caloric deficits 31:50 - Why you should not underestimate 40% of calories consumed 34:53 - Matt's favorite chapter in the book 'The Optimized Metabolism' 38:18 - NO Forbidden Foods: The importance of dietary strategy 40:24 - What are the three tactical things of Food Quantity 41:33 - Wade reveals the simplest secrets of dieting  45:42 -Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT): Why do emotional issues drive to overeating? 50:13 - Drug-like response to the brain: Understanding your food cravings  57:55 - Matt and Wade share their top three proteins of choice   1:02:34 - The Cultural Bias: Wade talks about the 'Plant-based Diet' 1:04:24 - Learn more about the 'Ultimate Nutrition Bible System'   1:07:23 - Wade on why you should validate the wins and give yourself an infinite dopamine loop 1:09:37 - Preventing Metabolic Damage: The importance of doing diet breaks 1:14:17 - Where you can go to connect with Matt Galant & Wade Lightheart     Resources: ·         The Ultimate Nutrition Bible ·         Magnesium Breakthrough   Connect w/ Matt and Wade at BiOptimizers: ·         Instagram ·         Facebook   Connect w/ CriticalBench:  ●      Youtube ●      Facebook ●      Instagram ●      CriticalBench.com ●      StrongByDesignPodcast.com

This week on How To Win: Gregory Galant of Muck Rack, discusses the journey of transforming a podcasting venture into a leading software solution for public relations professionals. You'll hear insights on the importance of building strong journalist relationships, the strategic pivot from service to software, and the value of slow, deliberate growth in the tech industry.Key Points:[00:04:21] "Time to first million in revenue?"[00:05:51] "Early days buyer understanding?"[00:07:12] "Shift to sales-led approach?"[00:09:36] "Product and sales balance for growth?"[00:10:12] "Changes post-$10 million revenue?"[00:13:48] "Market size doubt at $10 million?"[00:18:09] "Reasons for outlasting competitors?"[00:20:24] "Top advice for B2B founders?"Mentioned:Gregory GalantMuck RackGregory Galant's XMy Links:Twitter / XLinkedInWebsiteWynterSpeeroCXL

Episode 20 may have left us with some questions. Was Glavio really saved? What happened to Sherman and Sir Leon? Let's break down the Arc 2 season finale on the Song of Rest!

Download Gary's 13 Keys to Creating a Multi-Million Dollar Business from ⁠https://www.DitchDiggerCEO.com/ Greg Galant, co-founder and CEO of Muck Rack (https://muckrack.com/) and co-founder of the Shorty Awards (https://shortyawards.com/) talks about his journey to success - from building websites for businesses at 14, to starting his own podcast in 2005, way before the podcast industry exploded, to co-founding the Shorty Awards. In this episode, Gary and Greg Galant discuss: Shorty Awards The Power of Shaping the Narrative The Evolution of Job Titles in Startups Scaling Up LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/galant/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/gregory Instagram: https://instagram.com/gregory/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ggalant Website: https://muckrack.com/ Connect with Gary Rabine and DDCEO on:  Website:⁠ ⁠⁠https://www.DitchDiggerCEO.com/⁠  Instagram:⁠ ⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/DitchDiggerCEO⁠ TikTok: ⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@ditchdiggerceopodcast⁠  Facebook: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/DitchDiggerCEO⁠ Twitter: ⁠https://twitter.com/DitchDiggerCEO⁠  YouTube: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@ditchdiggerceo