Podcast appearances and mentions of erwin schr

ABOUT JON HYMANJon Hyman is the co-founder and chief technology officer of Braze, the customer engagement platform that delivers messaging experiences across push, email, in-app, and more. He leads the charge for building the platform's technical systems and infrastructure as well as overseeing the company's technical operations and engineering team.Prior to Braze, Jon served as lead engineer for the Core Technology group at Bridgewater Associates, the world's largest hedge fund. There, he managed a team that maintained 80+ software assets and was responsible for the security and stability of critical trading systems. Jon met cofounder Bill Magnuson during his time at Bridgewater, and together they won the 2011 TechCrunch Disrupt Hackathon. Jon is a recipient of the SmartCEO Executive Management Award in the CIO/CTO Category for New York. Jon holds a B.A. from Harvard University in Computer Science.ABOUT BRAZEBraze is the leading customer engagement platform that empowers brands to Be Absolutely Engaging.™ Braze allows any marketer to collect and take action on any amount of data from any source, so they can creatively engage with customers in real time, across channels from one platform. From cross-channel messaging and journey orchestration to Al-powered experimentation and optimization, Braze enables companies to build and maintain absolutely engaging relationships with their customers that foster growth and loyalty. The company has been recognized as a 2024 U.S. News & World Report Best Companies to Work For, 2024 Best Small & Medium Workplaces in Europe by Great Place to Work®, 2024 Fortune Best Workplaces for Women™ by Great Place to Work® and was named a Leader by Gartner® in the 2024 Magic Quadrant™ for Multichannel Marketing Hubs and a Strong Performer in The Forrester Wave™: Email Marketing Service Providers, Q3 2024.  Braze is headquartered in New York with 15 offices across North America, Europe, and APAC. Learn more at braze.com.SHOW NOTES:What Jon learned from being the only person on call for his company's first four years (2:56)Knowing when it's time to get help managing your servers, ops, scaling, etc. (5:42)Establishing areas of product ownership & other scaling lessons from the early days (9:25)Frameworks for conversations on splitting of products across teams (12:00)The challenges, complexities & strategies behind assigning ownership in the early days (14:40)Founding Braze (18:01)Why Braze? The story & insights behind the original vision for Braze (20:08)Identifying Braze's product market fit (22:34)Early-stage PMF challenges faced by Jon & his co-founders (25:40)Pivoting to focus on enterprise customers (27:48)“Let's integrate the SDK right now” - founder-led sales ideas to validate your product (29:22)Behind the decision to hire a chief revenue officer for the first time (34:02)The evolution of enterprise & its impact on Braze's product offering (36:42)Growing out of your early-stage failure modes (39:00)Why it's important to make personnel decisions quickly (41:22)Setting & maintaining a vision pre IPO vs. post IPO (44:21)Jon's next leadership evolution & growth areas he is focusing on (49:50)Rapid fire questions (52:53)LINKS AND RESOURCESWhen We Cease to Understand the World - Benjamín Labatut's fictional examination of the lives of real-life scientists and thinkers whose discoveries resulted in moral consequences beyond their imagining. At a breakneck pace and with a wealth of disturbing detail, Labatut uses the imaginative resources of fiction to tell the stories of Fritz Haber, Alexander Grothendieck, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger, the scientists and mathematicians who expanded our notions of the possible.This episode wouldn't have been possible without the help of our incredible production team:Patrick Gallagher - Producer & Co-HostJerry Li - Co-HostNoah Olberding - Associate Producer, Audio & Video Editor https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-olberding/Dan Overheim - Audio Engineer, Dan's also an avid 3D printer - https://www.bnd3d.com/Ellie Coggins Angus - Copywriter, Check out her other work at https://elliecoggins.com/about/

In questa puntata commento il libro di Federico Faggin, un testo illuminante che ti consiglio di leggere!

Explain Schrödinger's Cat in simple terms. Why did Erwin Schrödinger propose this thought experiment in the first place? What was Schrödinger trying to argue against with his cat example? Which other scientist inspired Schrödinger to devise the cat?  ... we explain like I'm five Thank you to the r/explainlikeimfive community and in particular the following users whose questions and comments formed the basis of this discussion: culturedgoat, flurb4, use-paragon, tenor1, hackey_sack, western_ground7478 and burnoutbrigheter6 To the ELI5 community that has supported us so far, thanks for all your feedback and comments. Join us on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/eli5ThePodcast/ or send us an e-mail: ELI5ThePodcast@gmail.com

¿Sabías que puedes transformar tus deseos en realidad utilizando principios de la física cuántica? 🌟 En este video, descubrirás: 🔹 Por qué no cumplimos nuestros propósitos anuales. 🔹 La importancia de un plan maestro con tareas específicas. 🔹 Cómo usar la ecuación de la realidad de Erwin Schrödinger para manifestar abundancia, amor y salud. 💡 Aprende a conectar tu mente y corazón para generar energía electromagnética que impacte tu vida. Este programa te guiará paso a paso para que dejes atrás los deseos incumplidos y conviertas cada año en tu mejor año. ¡Atrévete a cambiar tu realidad desde la ciencia y la espiritualidad! 🙌

Humanity's understanding of the universe radically altered with the advent of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century. The theory of quantum mechanics describes how nature behaves at or below the scale of atoms, and the road to that theory was littered with seemingly insurmountable obstacles. With us to discuss the development of quantum mechanics, and the major schools of thought represented by Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein, is Jim Baggott. Today we discuss many of the key players in the development of quantum mechanics, including Bohr, Einstein, Wolfgang Pauli, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Max Planck, and Max Born.

Julian Gough sums up his career as follows: “I just sit in my room and write.” Well, I think being an acclaimed children's author, novelist, stage playwright, poet and top-ten Irish musician is a little more impressive than he's letting on… Oh, and I didn't even mention that he wrote the ending to the computer game Minecraft! His current project, The Egg and The Rock, puts all of this to shame. This book, which Julian is writing in public on Substack, seeks to do no less than redescribe the universe, arguing that is not some random, dead, purposeless sack of chemicals, but instead a living, evolving organism. Julian joins me to discuss why the arc of human evolution bends towards man-made black holes, the hidden catastrophe at the heart of materialist science, the strange life of subterranean ice aliens, and MUCH more! This was such an interesting conversation - I can't wait for you to hear it. For the full transcript, episode takeaways, and bucketloads of other goodies designed to make you go, “Hmm, that's interesting!”, check out our Substack. Important Links: Julian's Website The Egg and The Rock Julian's Twitter Show Notes: “I just sit in my room and write” Why write a book in public? Materialism & science's hidden catastrophe “The scientific method is in conflict with human nature” The faulty assumption at the heart of cosmology Big bangs, supermassive black holes & Darwinian evolution: A ~30 minute masterclass in cosmological natural selection “I'm predicting very, very large amounts of life in this universe” The strange life of subterranean ice aliens Could we spot man-made black holes? Bringing consciousness into physics Pulling back the curtain Julian as World Emperor MORE! Books & Articles Mentioned: The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science; by Robert Anton Wilson Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge; by Paul Feyerabend What the Tortoise Said to Achilles; by Lewis Carroll The Life of the Cosmos; by Lee Smolin What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell; by Erwin Schrödinger Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology; by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky The Bhagavad Gita Did the Universe evolve?; by Lee Smolin The Great Filter - Are We Almost Past It?; by Robin Hanson

For today's episode, we go back to the origins of Autism. It seems necessary because of the recent shifts in what is Autism and the confusion in the rates of Autism. Autism was here in the 1930's, and it magically showed up in different areas of the world. (Part 2 on Asperger's "little professors" next). The two-part series intends to remember the phenotypes that appeared and became known as Autism.It is my opinion, the recent shifts in defining Autism could be rooted in questionable intentions. Regardless, one goal of the podcast is understanding and explaining Autism. By the end of the episode, and by the end of the two-part series, I hope you gain understanding of the Autistic Phenotype.Leo Kanner: Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact http://www.autismtruths.org/pdf/Autistic%20Disturbances%20of%20Affective%20Contact%20-%20Leo%20Kanner.pdf0:00 Intro0:45 Erwin Schrödinger Quote; Quantum Physics; Missing link in Medicine2:56 Kanner's Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact; Demographics3:52 Ages; Boys versus Girls; Phenotypes; Family History6:26 Important consideration of Family History- electricity and nnEMF; general observation and important phenotypes9:30 Anticipatory Motor Adjustment; Reflexes; Sensory and Adaptive Responses13:32 Monotonous Repetitions; Sameness15:26 Spelling and Language18:20 Commands and Intrusions18:57 Autism, not Autism and ADHD; Intense Fixations & Neuroplasticity; Default Mode Network; Sameness24:00 Oblivious to Others; Inattentive- It's not ADHD, it's Autism27:39 Changes & More on Sameness & Repetitions30:10 Rote Memory; Gastrointestinal: Timelines and MilestonesX: https://x.com/rps47586Hopp: https://www.hopp.bio/fromthespectrumemail: info.fromthespectrum@gmail.com

Erwin Schrödinger said that the important characteristic of life is that it "goes on doing something... for a much longer period than we would expect an inanimate piece of matter to keep going under similar circumstances." Living organisms are in constant motion inside; so where does this stability and persistence come from? Addy Pross points to a novel kind of chemical phenomenon -- "dynamic kinetic stability" (DKS), a feature that enables a chemical "fountain" to persist in the presence of an energy source. This suggests an interesting perspective on the question of life's origin, and perhaps on the origin of consciousness.Support Mindscape on Patreon.Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/10/28/294-addy-pross-on-dynamics-stability-and-life/Addy Pross received his Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Sydney. He is currently Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at Ben-Gurion University. He has held visiting positions in the University of Lund, Stanford University, Rutgers University, University of California at Irvine, University of Padova, the Australian National University Canberra, and the University of Sydney. He is the author of What Is Life? How Chemistry Becomes Biology.Web pageAmazon author pageGoogle Scholar publicationsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Sam Harris speaks with Sara Imari Walker about a scientific understanding of life. They discuss the contributions of physics to this topic, Erwin Schrödinger, the inadequacy of standard definitions of life, the prospect of "artificial" life, the role of information, constructor theory, assembly theory, the space of all possible structures, a "block universe," the existence of abstract objects like numbers, the Fermi paradox, the likelihood of life elsewhere in the universe, experiments that could decide how likely life is to emerge, the possibility of a Great Filter, the number of Earth-like worlds, and other topics. If the Making Sense podcast logo in your player is BLACK, you can SUBSCRIBE to gain access to all full-length episodes at samharris.org/subscribe. Learning how to train your mind is the single greatest investment you can make in life. That's why Sam Harris created the Waking Up app. From rational mindfulness practice to lessons on some of life's most important topics, join Sam as he demystifies the practice of meditation and explores the theory behind it.

Share this episode: https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/388-what-is-life Sam Harris speaks with Sara Imari Walker about a scientific understanding of life. They discuss the contributions of physics to this topic, Erwin Schrödinger, the inadequacy of standard definitions of life, the prospect of "artificial" life, the role of information, constructor theory, assembly theory, the space of all possible structures, a "block universe," the existence of abstract objects like numbers, the Fermi paradox, the likelihood of life elsewhere in the universe, experiments that could decide how likely life is to emerge, the possibility of a Great Filter, the number of Earth-like worlds, and other topics. Sara Imari Walker is an astrobiologist and theoretical physicist. She is the deputy director of the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science and a professor in the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University. She is also a fellow of the Berggruen Institute and a member of the external faculty at the Santa Fe Institute. She is a recipient of the Stanley L. Miller Early-Career Award for her research on the origin of life, and her research team at ASU is internationally regarded as being among the leading labs aiming to build a fundamental theory for understanding what life is. Her research has been featured in Scientific American, Quanta Magazine, and a variety of other international outlets. Her book, Life as No One Knows It: The Physics of Life's Emergence, is available now. Website: https://search.asu.edu/profile/1731899 Twitter: @Sara_Imari Learning how to train your mind is the single greatest investment you can make in life. That’s why Sam Harris created the Waking Up app. From rational mindfulness practice to lessons on some of life’s most important topics, join Sam as he demystifies the practice of meditation and explores the theory behind it.

Can consciousness be explained by quantum physics? What is quantum physics in the first place? Time to go down the rabbit hole. FRUMESS is POWERED by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.riotstickers.com/frumess⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ JOIN THE PATREON FOR LESS THAN A $2 CUP OF COFFEE!! ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/Frumess ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Hans Asperger called the children "little professors"- This is Autism.In this episode, we explore criteria B.3, which is the core of Autism. Donald Triplett's father's first sentence to Leo Kanner- He seems self-satisfied.Leo Kanner http://www.autismtruths.org/pdf/Autistic%20Disturbances%20of%20Affective%20Contact%20-%20Leo%20Kanner.pdfHans Asperger https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-97284-002Erwin Schrödinger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_Schrödinger0:00 Intro, Erwin Schrödinger and Leo Kanner; Light gives Life to Cells2:29 B.35:15 Hans Asperger, Autist7:19 Leo Kanner8:31 Paths to Superpowers; Autism and Education; Medicine and Charles Sidney Burwell13:50 Personal Experiences; Vietnam War; B.2 complications with B.315:22 Baseball Game and Probability16:52 Adult Examples17:55 1950s and Novel- example of Abnormal B.3; Thinking in Pictures and Supplementing Relationships21:29 Disruptions from unplanned or outside interference; Medication Approach and Warning23:36 Unusual Objects; ADHD prep; Finding interests in Life26:31 Check-Out lanes and Autism; Self-Satisified- This is Autism28:53 Circumscribed31:36 Perseverative; The Nervous System35:44 Bible; Inner-focus using B.3 as a Superpower and directing focus39:16 Dogs and Snakes39:50 Autistic Phenotype and B.3 at the Center40:30 Reviews/Ratings and Contact InfoX: https://twitter.com/rps47586Hopp: https://hopp.bio/fromthespectrumemail: info.fromthespectrum@gmail.com

2024. augusztus 12., hétfő 8-9 óra ADÓVILÁG: A tech energia vezető országai: Norvégia Norvégia, vagy hivatalos nevén a Norvég Királyság a világ 67. és Európa 6. legnagyobb országa. Területe gyéren lakott, óceáni partszakasza a fjordjairól ismert. Norvégia a skandináv térséggel együtt a világ legfejlettebb térségét alkotja az információs társadalom, az emberi jogok és a jövedelmi egyenlőség területén. Emberi fejlettségi indexe (HDI) alapján a legfejlettebb állam a Földön. Gerendy Zoltán, a BDO Magyarország ügyvezetője, adótanácsadó partnere és Feledy Botond, külpolitikai szakértő. ARANYKÖPÉS “Ha végül is nem tudjuk mindenkinek elmondani, mit tettünk, a munkánk nem érte el célját.” - Erwin Schrödinger, a kvantummechanika egyik atyja (1887).

Have you ever wondered if there's one belief that is shared across cultures throughout history? Well, there is. We see it in petroglyphs and signs and symbols and stories and holy books. That belief is that everything is connected. The universal symbol for the tree of life shares in that understanding. It arises in continents and cultures throughout the ages. We can see versions of the Tree of Life in Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, in Hebrew and Islamic creed, and throughout Europe. The limbs of the tree reach upward towards heaven, connecting us there. The branches and the leaves intertwine symbolizing connectedness to one another and to the earth. And the roots bury deep into the soil, connecting us to those who have gone before us. This story of connectedness can be seen in modern science as well—in chaos theory, gravity and quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement was discovered in the 1930s by a group of physicists, including Albert Einstein and Erwin Schrödinger—and it freaked them out! For decades, physicists argued the feasibility of entanglement until, in 1964, in the lab of John Stuart Bell in Geneva, he proved that quantum entanglement was in fact, reality. Well, what is quantum entanglement? In the simplest terms, quantum entanglement means that aspects of one particle of an entangled pair depend on aspects of the other particle, no matter how far apart they are or what lies between them The only way that this is possible is if these two electrons are still communicating, they're still entangled, and the implications of that are that the entire fabric of the universe is intertwined. The strange part of quantum entanglement is that when you measure something about one particle in an entangled pair, you immediately know something about the other particle, even if they are millions of light years apart. This odd connection between the two particles is instantaneous, seemingly breaking Einstein's theory that nothing travels faster than the speed of light. Einstein famously called the phenomenon “spooky action at a distance.” What does all this connectedness mean for us in our everyday lives? Albert Einstein went on to answer that question by stating, “our task is to free ourselves from this prison of thinking we are separate and widen our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.” Internationally bestselling author Lynn McTaggart agrees. She states, we are each a vital part of the whole. Equipped with the innate power to effect great change. By recognizing and honoring the connections that bind us, we could create a more compassionate, harmonious world where the well-being of all is considered. Lynne is consistently voted one of the world's top 100 spiritual leaders for her ground-breaking work with consciousness and the power of intention. As architect of the Intention Experiments, a web-based ‘global laboratory,' Lynne was prominently featured in the plotline of Dan Brown's blockbuster The Lost Symbol. Over the years Lynne has been called a ‘metaphysical rock star', ‘the Madonna of the Quantum World,' ‘the Malcolm Gladwell of the New Science' and even ‘The Dalai Mama.'   Please join me, Carlene Cross, as I speak with Lynn McTaggart about the implications of an interconnected universe. I hope that you will agree with Lynne when she says, “The most essential ingredient in creating our universe is the consciousness that observes it.” FPlease subscribe to my podcast on YouTube and on my website https://haveyoueverwonderedpodcast.com/. You can also follow me on all social media and view or listen to Have You Ever Wondered Podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, iHeart Radio or wherever you listen to podcasts.

This week we talk a little about Erwin Schrödinger (gross).... And a little bit about the rough couple of weeks we've had. Thanks for listening! Music by Kevin McCleod.

Austrian capital Vienna has a long history, dating back to the 1st century CE Roman military camp of Vindobona. It's been home to some pretty big names over the centuries. Mozart, Beethoven, Sigmund Freud, Gustav Klimt, Hedy Lamarr, Marie Antoinette and Erwin Schrödinger, among many others, have all lived in the city. Yet it's also got a darker side. Its vast Central Cemetery is a testament to the Viennese fascination with death. Empress Elisabeth of Austria, nicknamed Sissi, apparently had a fascination with the supernatural, and some say she still roams the hallways of the Hofburg palace. Let's find out more in this week's episode of Fabulous Folklore! Find the images and references on the blog post: https://www.icysedgwick.com/vienna-legends/ Get your free guide to home protection the folklore way here: https://www.icysedgwick.com/fab-folklore/ Become a member of the Fabulous Folklore Family for bonus episodes and articles at https://patreon.com/bePatron?u=2380595 Fabulous Folklore Bookshop: https://uk.bookshop.org/shop/fabulous_folklore Enjoyed this episode and want to show your appreciation? Buy Icy a coffee to say 'thanks' at: https://ko-fi.com/icysedgwick Pre-recorded illustrated talks: https://ko-fi.com/icysedgwick/shop Request an episode: https://forms.gle/gqG7xQNLfbMg1mDv7 Get extra snippets of folklore on Instagram at https://instagram.com/icysedgwick 'Like' Fabulous Folklore on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/fabulousfolklore/ Find Icy on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/icysedgwick.bsky.social Tweet Icy at https://twitter.com/IcySedgwick

Avec Françoise Bonardel, philosophe, professeur émérite des universités et spécialiste de la gnose, de l'hermétisme, de l'alchimie et du bouddhisme, nous ferons halte à Eranos, près d'Ascona. C'est en Suisse, sur les bords du lac Majeur. Jung a longtemps et régulièrement participé aux rencontres du Cercle Eranos, organisées par Olga Fröbe-Kapteyn. Il en a été une des grandes figures. S'y rencontraient notamment Henry Corbin, Martin Buber, Gilbert Durand, Marie-Louise von Franz, Karl Kérényi, Erwin Schrödinger, Mircea Eliade, Hermann Hesse, Romain Rolland et tant d'autres ! Le thème ? Une rencontre entre l'Orient et l'Occident !

Avec Françoise Bonardel, philosophe, professeur émérite des universités et spécialiste de la gnose, de l'hermétisme, de l'alchimie et du bouddhisme, nous ferons halte à Eranos, près d'Ascona. C'est en Suisse, sur les bords du lac Majeur. Jung a longtemps et régulièrement participé aux rencontres du Cercle Eranos, organisées par Olga Fröbe-Kapteyn. Il en a été une des grandes figures. S'y rencontraient notamment Henry Corbin, Martin Buber, Gilbert Durand, Marie-Louise von Franz, Karl Kérényi, Erwin Schrödinger, Mircea Eliade, Hermann Hesse, Romain Rolland et tant d'autres ! Le thème ? Une rencontre entre l'Orient et l'Occident !

Some of Dirac's notable works on Amazon: Lectures on Quantum Mechanics – ⁠https://amzn.to/3Q7ojMm The Principles of Quantum Mechanics – ⁠⁠https://amzn.to/443HUTu All of Paul Dirac's books – https://amzn.to/3xziZLd Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. __________________________________________________ Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac (8 August 1902 – 20 October 1984) was an English mathematical and theoretical physicist who is considered to be one of the founders of quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. He is credited with laying the foundations of quantum field theory. He was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, a professor of physics at Florida State University and the University of Miami, and a 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics recipient. Dirac made fundamental contributions to the early development of both quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics, coining the latter term. Among other discoveries, he formulated the Dirac equation in 1928, which describes the behaviour of fermions and predicted the existence of antimatter, and is considered one of the most important equations in physics, with it being considered by some to be the "real seed of modern physics". He wrote a famous paper in 1931, which further predicted the existence of antimatter. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics with Erwin Schrödinger "for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory". He also made significant contributions to the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics. His 1930 monograph, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, is considered to be one of the most influential texts on quantum mechanics. Dirac's contributions were not only restricted to quantum mechanics. He contributed to the Tube Alloys project, the British programme to research and construct atomic bombs during World War II. Furthermore, Dirac made fundamental contributions to the process of uranium enrichment and the gas centrifuge, and whose work was deemed to be "probably the most important theoretical result in centrifuge technology". He also contributed to cosmology, putting forth his large numbers hypothesis. Dirac is also seen as having anticipated string theory well before its inception, with his work on the Dirac membrane and Dirac–Born–Infeld action, amongst other contributions. Dirac was regarded by his friends and colleagues as unusual in character. In a 1926 letter to Paul Ehrenfest, Albert Einstein wrote of a Dirac paper, "I am toiling over Dirac. This balancing on the dizzying path between genius and madness is awful." In another letter concerning the Compton effect he wrote, "I don't understand the details of Dirac at all." In 1987, Abdus Salam stated that "Dirac was undoubtedly one of the greatest physicists of this or any century . . . No man except Einstein has had such a decisive influence, in so short a time, on the course of physics in this century." Audio source Buy me a coffee Chapters: (00:00) Lecture 1: Quantum Mechanics (59:32) Lecture 2: Quantum Electrodynamics (2:04:06) Lecture 3: Magnetic Monopoles (2:54:58) Lecture 4: Does 'G' Vary? (Large Numbers Hypothesis) --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Programa 4x104. El gat a dins la capsa est

Programa 4x104. El gat a dins la capsa est

In aflevering 65 van Radio Horzelnest reflecteren samen met techniekfilosoof Julia Rijssenbeek op de synthetische biologie en de vraag: wat is leven? In 1944 houdt de natuurkundige Erwin Schrödinger een voordracht aan Trinity College Dublin met de titel: ‘What is life?' Zijn voordracht is een lang gesponnen antwoord op deze wat-is vraag. Over het meest karakteristieke kenmerk van het leven schrijft hij: “Materie leeft wanneer het doorgaat met ‘iets doen', doorgaat met bewegen, materie uitwisselen met zijn omgeving, enzovoort, en dat voor een veel langere periode dan we zouden verwachten dat een levenloos stukje materie onder soortgelijke omstandigheden ‘doorgaat'.” Schrödingers voordracht bleek revolutionair. Zo beweerde hij ook voor het eerst dat erfelijke informatie lag opgeslagen in een moleculaire structuur, die hij zelf ‘het aperiodieke kristal' noemde, en waarmee hij een wegbereider was van de latere ontdekking van de dubbele helix. Sinds die ontdekking is de met name de genetica en de microbiologie in een stroomversnelling geraakt. In diezelfde stroom duikt nu als nieuw veld de synthetische biologie op, soms beschouwd als een tweede landbouwrevolutie. Waar de eerste revolutie zich richt op de domesticatie van planten en dieren, richt synthetische biologie zich op de domesticatie van de cel en haar onderdelen, met name gericht op voedselproductie, brandstof en medicijnen. Het onderzoek van Julia Rijssenbeek richt zich op de verborgen premissen, denkpatronen en manieren van spreken gebezigd in de synthetische biologie. Tegelijkertijd laat ze zien hoe dit nieuwe onderzoeksveld onze gangbare noties aangaande leven uitdaagt. Hoogste tijd voor een filosofische reflectie op synthetische biologie. . Julia Rijssenbeek is als promovenda verbonden aan de vakgroep filosofie van Wageningen University & Research. In het verleden studeerde ze Filosofie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam en filosofie van de economie aan de Erasmus Universiteit in Rotterdam. In haar huidige promotieonderzoek bestudeert ze de filosofische betekenis en ethische implicaties van recente en mogelijk toekomstige ontwikkelingen in de synthetische biologie. Daarnaast werkt Julia als onderzoeker bij FreedomLab Thinktank, een platform waar jonge onderzoekers politieke, technologische en culturele veranderingen proberen te begrijpen. De dansfilm waar Julia aan het einde van het gesprek over verteld gaat 16 maart in première met de titel ‘Cobalt', een samenwerking van Julia, Kim Baraka en Jonas Sacks. TIMESTAMPS 00:00-02:20 – Inleiding 02:20-17:19 – Julia's stage bij Jeantine Lunshof aan het Wyss Institute & Church Lab van Harvard University. Wat is synthetische biologie? en hoe spreken en denken wetenschapper over leven en de relatie tussen leven en techniek? 17:19-22:40 – Machine-ontologie en het machinaal begrepen leven. 22:40-33:29 – Metabolisme, de machine-metafoor en disruptieve techniek. 33:29-45:41 – Synthetische morfogenese, Michael Levin, Xenobots en de samenwerkingvermogens en basale cognitie van cellen. 45:41-57:33 – Hoe daagt de synthetische biologie de techniekfilosofie uit? Gilbert Simondon en de biologische techniekfilosofie, nieuw-materialisme, platte ontologie, levende techniek en technisch leven. 57:33-01:06:27 – Twee wereldbeelden: posthumanisme versus ecomodernisme in het voedseldebat en sciencefiction. 01:06:27-01:10:59 – Verkenning va natuur, techniek en leven in dans, outro

"Easy Physics" is a podcast that delves into the bizarre and fascinating world of this amazing science. Join us as we use humor and plain language to explore many foundamental principles, and learn about each one of them in a few minutes. From particles that exist in multiple places at once to the immensity of the cosmos, we'll take a lighthearted look at the most mind-bending concepts in physics.Note: This podcast is generated by GPT-4 Turbo and spoken by Elevenlabs TTS. You can try Elevenlabs here: elevenlabs (affiliate link)** Subscribing to Elevenlabs via this link won't mean any additional cost, but will help us continue growing this podcast. Thank you! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Soms kan verwarring helderheid bieden. Dat was de onverwachte uitkomst van het debat in de Tweede Kamer over het eindverslag van informateur Ronald Plasterk. Jaap Jansen en PG Kroeger analyseren wat er in dat document staat, wat in het debat gebeurde en wat het nu eigenlijk betekende.***Deze aflevering is mede mogelijk gemaakt met donaties van luisteraars die we hiervoor hartelijk danken. Word ook vriend van de show!Heeft u belangstelling om in onze podcast te adverteren of ons te sponsoren? Zend een mailtje naar adverteren@dagennacht.nl en wij nemen contact met u opOp sommige podcast-apps kun je niet alles lezen. De complete tekst en een overzicht van al onze eerdere afleveringen vind je hier***Erwin Schrödinger, een Weense Nobelprijswinnaar en natuurkundige kwam met een gedachtenexperiment over de raadselen van de kwantummechanica. Dat gaat over een doos met daarin een kat. "Zolang de doos dicht is, kan de kat tegelijkertijd zowel in leven zijn als dood. Zolang er geen observatie mogelijk is, is het niet anders te zeggen." Bèta Henri Bontenbal (CDA) kwam met de observatie dat medebèta Plasterk zo'n experiment was gaan doen.Die vrolijk-verfijnde analogie was een van de weinige lichte toetsen in het Kamerdebat van 14 februari 2024. Het eindverslag van de informateur bevatte ten diepste maar één mededeling: hij was niet geslaagd overeenstemming te bereiken. Geert Wilders (PVV) liet meteen blijken dat zijn instemming met de 'basislijn' rond de grondrechten ook inhield dat hij zijn haatdragende uitlatingen over de Islam nu nóg meer gelegitimeerd zag.De PVV-leider, Dilan Yesilgöz (VVD), Caroline van er Plas (BBB) en de oud-informateur maakten NSC-aanvoerder Pieter Omtzigt scherpe en buitengewoon harde verwijten. Zelf liet hij zich evenmin onbetuigd. Dit leidde tot een ongekend felle woordenstrijd met D66-chef Rob Jetten die als lid van het kabinet de eer verdedigde van zijn ambtelijke staf en de collega's in de ministerraad.De verwarring groeide doordat elke fractie een andere interpretatie ontwikkelde van het type kabinet dat nu nog haalbaar kan zijn. Wilders stelde dat Plasterk had verboden over nu juist dát thema te onderhandelen en daardoor ontstond de impasse.Een knappe interruptie van DENK-fractieleider Stephan van Baarle die Omtzigt deed onthullen wat in zijn ‘ideale wereld' de uitkomst zou zijn: een positie voor hemzelf en NSC die nog het meest doet denken aan die van Sybrand Buma en zijn CDA-fractie tijdens Rutte II (waar Omtzigt in zat).Wilders' voorstel om SER-voorzitter Kim Putters nu als informateur aan te stellen kon niet verhullen dat ook hij geen idee had hoe nu verder. De reacties van Plasterk boden weinig verheldering. Zijn verwijten naar Omtzigt en leutig bedoelde stekeligheden naar de PvdA en Frans Timmermans lieten zien dat hij zijn rol als columnist alweer opgepakt had.Kim Putters is nu belast met wat Helmut Kohl ‘ein Himmelfahrtskommando' zou noemen, zegt PG. Hij is geen 'tweede verkenner' à la de geflopte PVV-senator Gom van Strien. Daarvoor is er sinds diens sneven teveel narigheid bovengekomen. 'Relatietherapie lijkt gewenst' spotte Rob Jetten.Gelukkig kan Putters teruggrijpen op zijn eigen verfijnde analyse van het maken van een regeerakkoord. Die gaf hij in Betrouwbare Bronnen aflevering 25, nu vijf jaar geleden.***Verder kijkenHet debat over het eindverslag van informateur Ronald Plasterk***Verder lezenDe brief van Buma***Verder luisteren398 - Kabinetsformatie 2024: de lege stoel van Pieter Omtzigt396 – Waarom kabinetsformaties vaak zo tergend lang en stroperig zijn393 - Op naar een extraparlementair kabinet!390 - Kabinetsformatie 2023: Het ethos van de haai388 - Kabinetsformatie 2023: de lucht is geklaard, vier partijen kunnen met elkaar verder386 – Ronald Plasterk, een verkenner met passie384 - De overrompelende overwinning van Geert Wilders. Opnieuw slaat Nederland een onbekende weg in330 – Politieke paradoxen. Lessen uit de kabinetsformatie van 2021224 - Kabinetsformatie 2021: Het ongeduld van Mariëtte Hamer210 - Kabinetsformatie 2021: Herman Tjeenk Willink over het verval van de democratische rechtsorde***Tijdlijn00:00:00 – Deel 100:26:50 – Deel 200:44:42 – Deel 301:03:17 – Einde Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Matthew reviews an episode of Unbelievable from October 2021. A promo for the Premier Christianity course Confident Christianity featuring William Lane Craig, John Lennox, Amy Orr-Ewing and Gary Habermas. As usual, there are references below. 1) Unbelievable podcast - Confident Christianity October 1st 2012 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/confident-christianity-john-lennox-amy-orr-ewing-william/id267142101?i=1000537264086 2) Callumn Brown, death of Christian Britain https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203350423/death-christian-britain-callum-brown https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/236 3) Language Truth and Logic https://archive.org/details/AlfredAyer 4) Verification https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/160940690200100202 5) Tim Hull https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/eFA0I31BLCb 6) God and other minds https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/plantinga-gom.pdf 7) The Metaphilosophy of Naturalism https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271322119_The_Metaphilosophy_of_Naturalism 8) Sir Harry Kroto https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/02/sir-harry-kroto-nobel-prize-winning-chemist-dies-carbon 9) https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2011/jul/04/harry-kroto-science-truth 10) Erwin Schrödinger https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_Schr%C3%B6dinger 11) ETS Walton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Walton#:~:text=Ernest%20Thomas%20Sinton%20Walton%20%286%20October%201903%20%E2%80%93,atom.%20This%20section%20needs%20additional%20citations%20for%20verification. 12) Ghillean Prance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghillean_Prance 13) George Kline Quote https://www.compellingtruth.org/scientists-believe-God.html 14) Lee Rigby https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lee_Rigby 15) textual criticism https://www.britannica.com/topic/textual-criticism 16) Richard I https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_I_of_England 17) Maurice Casey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Casey 18) Alexander the Great in legend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great_in_legend 19) Historiography of Alexander the Great https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography_of_Alexander_the_Great To contact us, email: reasonpress@gmail.com Our Theme Music was written for us by Holly, to support her and to purchase her music use the links below: https://hollykirstensongs.com/ https://hollykirsten.bandcamp.com/ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/still-unbelievable/message

The Science of Healing and Quantum Faith (3)   (Audio) Timelines  (Our thanks to Deb and husband Will Horton, who majored in Physics.) (David's notes in red) Wikipedia defines “quantum” as: “In physics, a quantum (the plural ‘quanta') is the minimum amount of any physical entity or physical property involved in an interaction.  The fundamental notion that a physical property can be "quantized" is referred to as "the hypothesis of quantization". This means that the magnitude of the physical property can take on only discrete values consisting of integer multiples of one quantum. For example, a photon is a single quantum of light of a specific frequency (or of any other form of electromagnetic radiation). Similarly, the energy of an electron bound within an atom is quantized and can exist only in certain discrete values. (Atoms and matter in general are stable because electrons can exist only at discrete energy levels within an atom.) Quantization is one of the foundations of the much broader physics of quantum mechanics. Quantization of energy and its influence on how energy and matter interact (quantum electrodynamics) is part of the fundamental framework for understanding and describing nature.”  Willard says that an “element” (or “particle”) of time is not yet defined in science. However, the Bible does define a particle of time. It is the “twinkling of an eye” in (1Co.15:51) Behold, I tell you a mystery: We all shall not sleep, but we shall all be changed, (52) in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. According to Strong's, “moment” is from átomos (from 1 /A "not" and 5114 /tomṓteros, "to cut") – properly, not able to cut (divide) because too small to be measured, like a "split second"; an "instant; an indivisible moment of time, too short to measure" (Souter).   Deb: If it's indivisible, then that means it is in a wave form.      Schrodinger's Cat:   Re: The 10/27/23 Friday UBM Live Broadcast  As David started his explanation of what the factious satanists had done to sacrifice Eve Brast and how she had been snatched out of her grave in the woods where they buried her, by an angel over the UBM angels, named Baruch.  And how she had received another body, how some of the factious died yet came back only to die again, and many other events that had occurred involving opposing timelines, I was beginning to freak out. I thought maybe David had been invaded by some New Age spirit and was going down the path of transmigration of the soul, but as he continued, I realized I was hearing "Schrodinger's Cat as described by David."  Wikipedia says:  “In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, of quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This thought experiment was devised by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935[1] in a discussion with Albert Einstein[2] to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.”  So I emailed David about the broadcast and my initial concern, along with a link to an article with the best layman's explanation of the Schrodinger's Cat paradox that I could find. But when David tried the link, it came up "404 Page Not Found." After David replied to my email and I tried it again, that link came up "404 Page Not Found" for me, too.  Well, it was there for me or I couldn't have read the article and copied the link and sent it to David. Then suddenly I realized that the Lord was actually verifying the premise of Schrodinger's Cat, which is that something can be there and not be there at the same time.  Why and how is that possible?  (When the Lord first spoke to me of two opposite timelines running parallel at the same time I did not understand. As time went on I understood that the good believers timeline was actuated by our faith in believing we have received what we ask for. Mar 11:23-24 ASV  Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou taken up and cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that what he saith cometh to pass; he shall have it. (Speak to the mountains that hinder your path and remove them like unbelief.) 24  Therefore I say unto you, All things whatsoever ye pray and ask for, believe that ye received (Greek) them, and ye shall have them. (So we see that everything you pray and ask for believe you have received it by order of Jesus. This is the believer's timeline. The other timeline is the unbeliever's timeline which is under the curse. What Quantum Physics or Mechanics has proven is that the whole creation is set up to answer our prayers of faith. Our experiences in this regard are parables that help us realize the necessity to know what faith is and to use it.) The least technical scientific explanation I can give you of the Schrodinger's Cat paradox is that merely by the act of observing something, the observer does indeed affect what is being observed. (We see in our minds eye what we want or need when we ask for it.) You may possibly have run across this in a Science News or Scientific American article where they discuss how those observing a complex experiment may inadvertently affect that experiment because they are looking for a specific outcome. In some cases, multiple observers may each obtain a different outcome because that was the outcome they desired to find, so multiple observers are able to cause multiple outcomes.   What is seen, or what is called "reality," actually does depend on the observer, i.e. the faith of the person to see the thing they have asked for. And that matches what Jesus said in (Mat.9:29) ... According to your faith be it done unto you.  Here are the pieces of Barry Rothman's arkcode.com write-up where the Bible describes altering timelines by reversing them.  [Beginning of copied Rothman section.] “The 37th chapter of Ezekiel calls to mind what would be seen on a film if an army were suddenly killed, fell to the ground, then started to rot and decompose. There's just one problem – Ezekiel 37 describes what would be seen if the film were run in reverse. That is, it seems to portray resurrection as a process akin to the reversal of time. But while Ezekiel is interpreted by some as metaphor, 2nd Kings 20:8 -11 is a very different matter. The incident in question is as follows:  (2Ki.20:8) And Hezekiah said to Isaiah: “What shall be the sign that the LORD will heal me, and that I shall go up to the house of the LORD the third day?” (9) And Isaiah said: “This shall be the sign to you from the LORD, that the LORD will do that thing that He has spoken: shall the shadow go forward ten degrees, or back ten degrees?” (10) And Hezekiah answered “It is a light thing for the shadow to decline ten degrees, nay, but let the shadow return backward ten degrees.” (11) And Isaiah the prophet cried unto the LORD; and he brought back the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down on the dial of Ahaz.  The story of how Isaiah, with God's help, reversed time (or the spin of the Earth) is also found in Isaiah 38:8, which states, "Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the dial, which is gone down in the sun-dial of Ahaz, to return ten degrees backward. So the sun returned ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down."  The BACKWARD description mentioned earlier with respect to the film analogy can be seen in Ezekiel 37:1 to 14:  (Eze.37:1) The hand of the LORD was upon me, and the LORD carried me out in a spirit, and set me down in the midst of a valley, and it was full of dry bones; (2) and he caused me to pass by them round about, and, behold, there were very many in the open valley, and, lo, they were very dry. (3) And He said to me: ‘Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, You know.'  (Eze.37:4) Then He said to me: ‘Prophesy over these bones, and say to them: O you dry bones, hear the word of the LORD: (5) Thus says the LORD GOD unto these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and you shall live. (6) And I will lay sinews on you, and you will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the LORD.'  (Eze.37:7) So I prophesied as I was commanded; and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and a commotion, and the bones came together, bone to its bone. (8) And I beheld, and lo, there were sinews upon them, and flesh came up, and skin covered them above; but there was no breath in them.  (Eze.37:9) Then He said to me: ‘Prophesy unto the breath, prophesy, son of man, and say to the breath: Thus says the LORD GOD: Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.' (10) So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, and they were a very great host.  (Eze.37:11) Then He said to me: ‘Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel; behold, they say: Our bones are dried up, and our hope is lost; we are clean cut off. (12) Therefore prophesy, and say unto them: Thus says the LORD GOD: Behold, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, my people; and I will bring you into the land of Israel. (13) And you shall know that I am the LORD, when I open your graves, and caused you to come up out of your graves, O my people. (14) And I will put my Spirit in you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land; and you shall know that I the LORD have spoken, and performed it, says the LORD.  RESURRECTION IN TORAH AND TALMUD. The picture that the Torah paints of resurrection is again one that resembles the reversal of time. In Deuteronomy 32:39 we read, "See now, that I am He - and no god is with me. I put to death and I bring life, I wound and I will heal, and there is no rescuer from My hand." The Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin (91b) discusses this verse.  It states, "Our Rabbis taught: I kill, and I make alive. I might interpret, I kill one person and give life to another, as the world goes on: therefore the Writ states, I wound, and I heal. Just as the wounding and healing [obviously] refer to the same person, so putting to death and bringing to life refer to the same person. This refutes those who maintain that resurrection is not intimated in the Torah." With respect to the arrow of time, the normal sequence would be healthy wounded still alive dead. But the sequence in Deuteronomy 32:39 is dead brought back to life living, but wounded healed. This again looks like a reversal of the arrow of time.” [End of copied Rothman section.]  Deb: Notice that if time can be stopped and then reversed, then time also has the characteristics of a particle. Also, Barry Rothman didn't include the most famous time stop ever, which is when Joshua commanded the sun and moon to stand still, because the sun and moon responded to the spoken words of faith.  (Jos.10:12) Then spake Joshua to Jehovah in the day when Jehovah delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel; and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; And thou, Moon, in the valley of Aijalon. (13) And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, Until the nation had avenged themselves of their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jashar? And the sun stayed in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day. (14) And there was no day like that before it or after it, that Jehovah hearkened unto the voice of a man: for Jehovah fought for Israel. (Barry is quite right, a reversal of time would bring back your old body at a younger age. But this is not the case as we know from Eve's body and the gifts that came with it. This is not a resurrection of the old body but a new body given by God.)     Eve's New Body    (I believe Eve's new body shows us what the Bride will have.) Deb Horton: I couldn't sleep and just kept pondering about Eve's new body. At the Pot Blessing, I talked to David about the two verses I shared with Terri and he agreed. He also said (1) he couldn't explain everything in a 2 hour broadcast, so I fussed at him about his choice of words because people could take them the wrong way just as I initially did and (2) he said that the Lord told him Eve's body was so defiled He wouldn't resurrect it but gave her a new body instead. (2Co.5:17) Wherefore if any man is in Christ, he is a new creature: the old things are passed away; behold, they are become new.  I went to the Greek and it could mean a completely different body.   Terri McGinley: I asked and got a “no” (for a resurrection of the old body). I asked if Eve had a completely different body and got six heads in a row. I originally got four and asked for two more to confirm a “yes”.   (Eve was given a new younger body (This is not a glorified body. This was a resurrection to a physical life and hence it is a physical body.) Her spiritual woman was pulled out of the grave after two days of being buried and was given a young completely healthy body. Her spiritual woman is her spirit and the part of her soul that was born of God. Whereas her old carnal man was her flesh and the part of her soul that was unregenerate, which God said burned up. Her body was not taken from the ashes of her old body because God said they were defiled. Ashes are pure from disease, germs, etc. But they came from the old man so in the spirit realm they are defiled. I believe the DNA was more in line with the Lord's. When we eat His Body and drink His Blood, He said that we have His life. I have been seen in dreams in such a body, too. I believe it is the restoration of years under the curse mentioned in Joel 2 and the "restoration of all" ("things" was not in the Greek). Meaning all of the fully sanctified ones in Acts 3:21 who will be completely restored. Just as Eve typed the Bride in many dreams, I believe the Bride will all have this regenerate body when the out-resurrection comes with the spiritual resurrection of the Man-child to the throne. She has a body like she would have wanted. She looks mostly like original Eve but younger and prettier. Her hair which was died red is now naturally red. She has no hair on her legs since she hated shaving it and her legs are more slim. She also has wonderful gifts now, like Jesus had, like reading minds and seeing things in the Spirit anywhere. Her discernment is great. I was told by the Lord that she was almost unique on earth because of her physical and spiritual makeup. I asked if she ever had a symptom of sickness or pain and she said, “never”. It appears she is not under the curse. Matt's dream below shows her to have a special spiritual ministry for UBM. We have already seen some of this. For instance she is able to look in on our enemies.)  Terri McGinley asked: Is this where someone came back into a different body or am I just missing it. I received 2 tails for No. (She was given by God a completely new body that was similar in looks but without characteristics she did not like.) So I asked for a verse by random computer and received (Act.2:38) And Peter [said] unto them, Repent ye, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto the remission of your sins; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.  What do I need to repent of? I received (Php.3:20) For our citizenship is in heaven; whence also we wait for a Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: [But look at the next verse & completion of the sentence:] (21) who shall fashion anew the body of our humiliation, that it may be conformed to the body of his glory, according to the working whereby he is able even to subject all things unto himself.  I just don't know. The Bible says there's nothing new. (Meaning it has happened before. Melchizedek had no earthly lineage. Heb 7:3  without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like unto the Son of God, abideth a priest continually. We are the body of Christ and we are being conformed to His image.     The Double Slit Experiment  Time (or the perception thereof) is also both a particle and a wave.  Example: As soon as you say, "Now," your "Now" is your past and you are in your future, so technically, everything that can/will ever happen is happening all at the same time.  Here's the link to a more layman's explanation per Willard:  https://www.space.com/double-slit-experiment-light-wave-or-particle  Excerpt: “The double-slit experiment is one of the most famous experiments in physics and definitely one of the weirdest. It demonstrates that matter and energy (such as light) can exhibit both wave and particle characteristics — known as the particle-wave duality of matter — depending on the scenario, according to the scientific communication site Interesting Engineering” (which is the site that Michael found).  “According to the University of Sussex, American physicist Richard Feynman referred to this paradox as the central mystery of quantum mechanics.   We know the quantum world is strange, but the two-slit experiment takes things to a whole new level. The experiment has perplexed scientists for over 200 years, ever since the first version was first performed by British scientist Thomas Young in 1801.”  https://interestingengineering.com/science/what-is-the-double-slit-experiment-and-why-is-it-so-important      Coming Resurrections   Eve's New Job  Matthew Stewart 11/4/23 (David's notes in red)    I had this dream the morning of November 4th.  I dreamt that we were in the middle of a regular, local meeting, and David was teaching. But then I had a vision within the dream:  It was like the time before the meeting where everybody fellowships. I saw Leon was resurrected and sitting in a chair with his usual expression on his face. And I thought, “Leon's back!” Then I looked over and saw another man that had gone to heaven sitting there as well. In the dream I knew him, but when I woke up, I didn't remember who he was. Then I looked and saw Eve sitting in a chair, very meek, reserved and humble. I remember thinking that “They're all back! They're all coming back!” (And it happened at a local meeting.) Then I turned and looked into the center of the room where there was a commotion going on. I went over there, and Amber was slowly physically materializing from the ground up. After she was fully formed, she said hi to me and I said hi back and everyone was excited.  So I went to look for Eve and she was getting ready to leave to go back to her place to do some work for the ministry. So I followed her and her work place was in outer space. (A job “in heavenly places in Christ.”) It was a big floating house in outer space (Cyber space), from which you could go there freely without a spaceship or special equipment to breathe.    So I followed her up into space to her house and she went to work on a computer to get something done for the ministry. And I thought to myself, “This is cool!”  (Notice that Eve is higher up the timeline than the rest of us because at the moment she is further into the future on the same believing timeline than the rest of us. Eve already has her new body which we will have in the future.  To prove this she was going to come to our meeting and she was late. We were already worshipping and I was guiding her in, speaking to her in the spirit, which we both have a gift to do. I told her which roads to take which were just two and what road to turn on to come to the address of the property, which was clearly marked on the front of the building. We were worshipping as I talked to her in my mind, which can also be done with words. There were many cars out front and we were pretty loud inside. She said, I am there looking at the address on the building and no one is there. I said, can't you hear the noise and see all the cars. She said there are no cars and no noise and no one is there. I walked out of the meeting in front of everybody and out the front door and saw no Eve.  She said I am here at the same address and street. What the Lord told me was that until we got our new body we would not be in the same time even though we were on the same timeline. She was ahead of us in heavenly maturity as far as her body was concerned. Also she has tried to come to my house to talk to me and Michael 3 times. I would ask her where she was because it was taking too long. She would identify things along the way showing she was getting closer. Then I would ask her “where are you now?” because she should have been here. She found herself back at her apartment vehicle and all and we both were confused. At the out-resurrection, they and us, will all be at the same time and on the same timeline because we will all have the same body at the restoration of all. Then the vision ended and David was still teaching. So I raised my hand to tell David the vision I just had, but David told me to wait until he was done with his teaching. Then I woke up. (This is showing when the teaching with the former rain anointing is over the Man-child will be resurrected spiritually to the throne to begin the latter rain anointing of the Soloman Man-child.) When speaking or thinking a conversation with people in the Spirit it is very clear even when speaking to someone on the other side of the earth or in heaven or in hell. This is the only way to speak to our missionaries in a Muslim land that is not dangerous for them because they hack their phones and emails. The angels told us they were going to give us supernatural methods to get the gospel out in the near future. It is happening. I spoke to Amber in heaven. She told me to tell Brandy she is coming soon. Only once have I seen an interruption of this gift and it was God ordained. I was trying to speak to leaders on the unbelieving cursed timeline and they couldn't hear me.  This happened with Jesus also. I found out later that the fleshly carnal men on that timeline who were traitors are strengthened when you acknowledge them. This we found out with Kevin when he came back we had to ignore and renounce him so he died as God said. The old man must die for the spiritual man on the believing timeline to live. “As the outer man is decaying the inner man is renewed day by day.” “Reckon your selves to be dead” “Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body”.)     Amber's Return Flight  Anna Stewart 11/19/23 (David's notes in red)    My dream started before Amber had died. I had no knowledge in the dream that she had ever died. She was sick but still able to move around for herself. She took a flight somewhere and was now soon scheduled to return. (From heaven)  We were discussing who would pick her up from the airport. I volunteered to go but Debbie said she'd pick her up since she'd already be there (Meaning Debbie would be back home with us to pick up Amber. She just came back from her trip to see family. So Amber will be here soon with the rest of the out-resurrection.) We agreed but then I was attacked with thought that her flight might be delayed. I cast those thoughts down and thought, “No, she is going to arrive on time with no delays.” Well she definitely took a flight to heaven, but praise God she's coming back! And it appears this will be soon? If nothing else, I believe it is an encouragement that's she's coming and to cast down any thoughts of it being delayed. May we all be counted worthy to see this thing through to the end!  Deb Horton: Time also exhibits the characteristics of both a wave and a particle. Example: As soon as you say, "Now," you are in your future and your "now" is your past, so technically, everything that can ever happen in creation is happening all at the same time, which perfectly supports the concept of different timelines and holding fast by faith to the promise.  So in other words, Amber is already returned. The problem is that we have to have the eyes to see her at this time. I think Anna's dream (and many other dreams) are helping us to see this now!  May the Father multiply our faith as the stars of heaven! In Jesus' Name, amen.      “Amber IS Going to Arrive on Time”  Deb Horton  Some 50 or so years back, I simultaneously experienced two timelines running at different speeds. Here's what happened.  Our neighbors down the street, Sue and Denny, were going to give us the swing set that their children had outgrown and so Denny called to let me know that he would be coming over with it that morning. The phone rang. I picked up the receiver and said, “Hello.” I heard Denny say, “Hi, this is Deh...” and I was gone, thrown out of my body.  I found myself standing under the shadow of what I just assumed was the wing of an airplane. There was barely enough light to see more than shadows and the wind was just howling and groaning. (Yes, that's the classic description of the astral plane.) I don't know why I wasn't scared to death. Everything around me was either concrete or tarmac and I was in the middle of speaking with some man. Well, not speaking. We had to shout over the noise of the wind. There was only one other man that I knew named Dennis back from when I lived in D.C., and although I couldn't really see who this man was, that's who I thought it was.  We had to have been talking for at least three to four hours when I heard, “nee,” the second syllable of Denny's name. I was back in the kitchen with the telephone receiver in my hand like nothing had happened. Next to no time had elapsed.   As David likes to say, “God always starts on time to finish on time.”      Cutting The Python  Marie Kelton 11/20/23 (David's notes in red)  During the morning meeting, David was talking about the two timelines and that in the bad timeline the people are dead to God's ways. I had an open vision of a python with half of its body coiled up. The other half with the head was lying on the ground dying. I then saw a hand holding a cleaver knife; it cut the body connected to the head apart from the coiled part of the body. (The part of the body with the mouth and teeth is the unbelieving bad timeline who are the factious and other failed people who will eventually die off under the curse for lack of faith and good confession. “Death and life are in the power of the tongue.” Mat 12:36 ASV  And I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.)  A factious woman we know is on the bad timeline and thinks it's the only timeline until God took her to hell and showed the factious satanist leaders and their head Kevin burning in hell. She was told this was her timeline end if she didn't repent.     Alternate Time Island  Anonymous 11/20/23 (David's notes in red)  In my dream I was on this desert island with David Eells and we would somehow translate on and off the island to normal land. It was really nice having this, like a private island and freedom.   However, a couple that fell into faction were also on the island and we could see them but they couldn't see us, even if we stood next to them. Deb: (Luk.16:26) And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, that they that would pass from hence to you may not be able, and that none may cross over from thence to us.  We saw them moving around and living on the island but where they were was all dark colors and the parts of the island they moved on, was as if it were a different island with thorns and not nice colors and difficult areas; the land seemed dark and cursed and haunted. Deb: (Heb.6:7) For the land which hath drunk the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them for whose sake it is also tilled, receiveth blessing from God: (8) but if it beareth thorns and thistles, it is rejected and nigh unto a curse; whose end is to be burned.  But the island we were on was colored and beautiful and not cursed, even though this was the exact same island the factious couple were on. I felt that they didn't even want to be able to see us, and they couldn't at all, but we could see them. They were not able to get off the island, they were stuck on it, but David and I could freely leave the island as we desired.  (The island had all the opportunities of Quantum Physics and if you see and believe you will receive but they can only see their cursed timeline. 2Co 4:3-4 ASV  And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled in them that perish:  4  in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn upon them.) It was kind of like two different realities but as one. The two of us had the choice to see both realities as we desired, but the factious couple could only see the one they were in and they had no knowledge or understanding of anything else. (They believe they are in the only timeline but they don't know it ends in hell.)     Multiple Shifting Timelines  Deb Horton: I am not the best explainer but here goes.  If nothing is fixed/set/real/manifested (choose your word) until it is observed and believed, then all possibilities have to exist simultaneously. The cat has to be alive, and the cat has to be dead, and the cat never has to have been in the box, and the cat has to be having kittens in the box, and the cat has to be a yellow tabby, and the cat has to be a calico, and so on. Every possibility of the cat has to be there to meet the expectation of every possible observer being either positive or negative.  Interestingly, multiple timelines seem to be appearing in movies. For example, Angel Studios has released “The Shift” as “a modern-day retelling of the book of Job. Kevin Garner gets separated from Molly, the love of his life, when a mysterious adversary known as The Benefactor sends him to an alternate dystopian reality. Will hope and faith be enough to find his way back? See The Shift in theaters December 1st.” And the Deep State media has released another movie about timelines called “Everything Everywhere All At Once.” The NPR movie review says: “Multiverses are having something of a moment, popping up in recent movies like Spider-Man: No Way Home and upcoming ones like Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness. It's refreshing, then, to get a new multiverse movie this week that doesn't spring from the world of comic-book superheroes. It's called Everything Everywhere All at Once — an apt title for a movie that imagines the existence of thousands of alternate timelines, featuring thousands of alternate versions of ourselves.” So the Bible is (no surprise) correct. (Deu.30:19) I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse: therefore choose life, (Choose to believe the good timeline that agrees with promises in the Word.) that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed; (20) to love Jehovah thy God, to obey his voice, and to cleave unto him; for he is thy life, and the length of thy days; that thou mayest dwell in the land which Jehovah sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.   (Eze.12:2) Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of the rebellious house, that have eyes to see, and see not, that have ears to hear, and hear not; for they are a rebellious house.   (Luk.8:10) And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to the rest in parables; that seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not understand.  And I think this explains, (Psa.82:6) I said, Ye are gods, And all of you sons of the Most High. (7) Nevertheless ye shall die like men, And fall like one of the princes. We are co-creators of our life based on what we choose to believe. 

Ken Wilber, a visionary philosopher and mystic, is renowned for his integral "theory of everything" that unites diverse fields of knowledge. Often likened to the "Einstein of consciousness studies," he's a leading scholar of human development's Integral stage. With over 20 translated books, Wilber's work spans across disciplines and is celebrated for its broad applications, from science to spirituality. He founded the Integral Institute and co-founded Integral Life, both platforms for advancing the integral vision. Based in Denver, Colorado, he continues to be an influential philosopher, author, and teacher. Visit Ken Wilber's IG Account! instagram.com/ken.wilber.official Check Out Ken Wilber's Books! https://www.amazon.com/stores/Ken-Wilber/author/B000APH4W2?ref=ap_rdr&store_ref=ap_rdr&isDramIntegrated=true&shoppingPortalEnabled=true 00:00 - Introduction 01:29 - How Andy Initially Struggled to Understand Ken's Content 03:48 - Ken Wilber on Buddhism, Types of Wholeness, and Awakening 10:00 - William James' Studies on the State of Consciousness 11:38 - James Mark Baldwin's Structures of Consciousness 14:05 - How People Move from Birth to the Integral Stage of Development 15:29 - Stage of Growing Up 17:37 - Two Types of Wholeness by Sigmund Freud's Inner Circle 21:46 - Final Type of Wholeness: Showing Up 24:09 - The Five Types of Wholeness 26:20 - Ken Wilber on Studying Zen 27:36 - How to Practice Meditation, Oneness, Unity 29:31 - Douglas Harding's Book: "On Having No Head" 32:17 - How Does Ken Deal with Fear and Anxiety? 33:47 - Ken on Energy Consumption 35:17 - What Happens If You Wake Up with Less Serotonin, Less Dopamine? 36:22 - Ken Wilber's Day-to-Day Life 37:59 - Lucid Dream and Deep Dream State 40:59 - Ken Wilber's Waking Up State 44:06 - What Are Dreams? 5 States of Consciousness 49:18 - 3 Types of Objects 51:56 - Deep Formless State/Deep Dreamless State 53:25 - How Does Ken Integrate the Feeling of Oneness in His Everyday Life 56:02 - Ken on Eastern Tradition: Sat Chit Ananda 57:26 - Finding and Creating Your Unique True Self 01:00:45 - Erwin Schrödinger: Founder of Modern Quantum Mechanics 01:02:59 - Who or What Is the Ultimate Reality 01:04:44 - Ken Wilber's Motivation to Continue Writing Books 01:08:19 - Ken's State of Self Unity in Working 01:10:45 - Does Ken Feel Exhausted from His Sleep Schedule? 01:12:26 - Stan Grof's Holotropic Breathwork Psychedelic 01:17:41 - Where Does Ken Gain His Energy? 01:19:21 - Ken's Experience with Dalai Lama and Other Gurus 01:21:12 - Ken on Practicing Dzogchen and Zen Meditation 01:22:52 - How Does Ken Tap into the 5th State or State of Pure Unity 01:24:25 - Can Humans Evolve After Tapping into the 5th State and Have the Ability to Talk to Aliens? 01:28:49 - How Do People Focus Their Attention on Certain Things? 01:30:15 - Andy's Experience Praying with His Christian Friends 01:32:31 - Ken on Having Children 01:37:47 - Ken on Finding and Having a Partner 01:38:55 - Ken's Ultimate Real Self and Small Relative Self 01:41:12 - How Does Ken Wilber Gain Knowledge? 01:42:53 - How Does Ken Choose the Books He Reads? 01:44:28 - Why Is Intelligence Universal? 01:45:56 - How Does Ken Spend His Time Every Day? 01:46:50 - How Does Ken Experience His Lucid Dreams? 01:48:27 - Ken's Writing Process 01:50:23 - Does Ken Speak Faster Than He Types? 01:52:21 - How Do You Learn from Past Experiences and Dreams? 01:54:03 - Ken's Latest Book: Finding Radical Wholeness 01:55:55 - Ken on Having Shambhala as His Publisher 01:57:46 - Ken's Reading Process 01:59:03 - How Do the 5 States of Wholeness Impact Ken's Life? 02:00:33 - Connect with Ken Wilber! 02:02:30 - Outro

YouTube link https://youtu.be/zMPnrNL3zsE Gregory Chaitin discusses algorithmic information theory, its relationship with Gödel incompleteness theorems, and the properties of Omega number.  Topics of discussion include algorithmic information theory, Gödel incompleteness theorems, and the Omega number. Listen now early and ad-free on Patreon https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal. Sponsors:  - Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) - Crypto: https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE - PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs - iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802 - Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e - Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything - TOE Merch: https://tinyurl.com/TOEmerch LINKS MENTIONED: - Meta Math and the Quest for Omega (Gregory Chaitin): https://amzn.to/3stCFxH - Visual math episode on Chaitin's constant: https://youtu.be/WLASHxChXKM - Podcast w/ David Wolpert on TOE: https://youtu.be/qj_YUxg-qtY - A Mathematician's Apology (G. H. Hardy): https://amzn.to/3qOEbtL - The Physicalization of Metamathematics (Stephen Wolfram): https://amzn.to/3YUcGLL - Podcast w/ Neil deGrasse Tyson on TOE: https://youtu.be/HhWWlJFwTqs - Proving Darwin (Gregory Chaitin): https://amzn.to/3L0hSbs - What is Life? (Erwin Schrödinger): https://amzn.to/3YVk8Xm - "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem" (Alan Turing): https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/T... - "The Major Transitions in Evolution" (John Maynard Smith and Eörs Szathmáry): https://amzn.to/3PdzYci - "The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language" (John Maynard Smith and Eörs Szathmáry): https://amzn.to/3PeKFeM - Podcast w/ Stephen Wolfram on TOE: https://youtu.be/1sXrRc3Bhrs - Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel (Rebecca Goldstein): https://amzn.to/3Pf8Yt4 - Rebecca Goldstein on TOE on Godel's Incompleteness: https://youtu.be/VkL3BcKEB6Y - Gödel's Proof (Ernest Nagel and James R. Newman): https://amzn.to/3QX89q1 - Giant Brains, or Machines That Think (Edmund Callis Berkeley): https://amzn.to/3QXniYj - An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (William Feller): https://amzn.to/44tWjXI TIMESTAMPS: - 00:00:00 Introduction - 00:02:27 Chaitin's Unconventional Self-Taught Journey - 00:06:56 Chaitin's Incompleteness Theorem and Algorithmic Randomness - 00:12:00 The Infinite Calculation Paradox and Omega Number's Complexity (Halting Probability) - 00:27:38 God is a Mathematician: An Ontological Basis - 00:37:06 Emergence of Information as a Fundamental Substance - 00:53:10 Evolution and the Modern Synthesis (Physics-Based vs. Computational-Based Life) - 01:08:43 Turing's Less Known Masterpiece - 01:16:58 Extended Evolutionary Synthesis and Epigenetics - 01:21:20 Renormalization and Tractability - 01:28:15 The Infinite Fitness Function - 01:42:03 Progress in Mathematics despite Incompleteness - 01:48:38 Unconventional Academic Approach - 01:50:35 Godel's Incompleteness, Mathematical Intuition, and the Platonic World - 02:06:01 The Enigma of Creativity in Mathematics - 02:15:37 Dark Matter: A More Stable Form of Hydrogen? (Hydrinos) - 02:23:33 Stigma and the "Reputation Trap" in Science - 02:28:43 Cold Fusion - 02:29:28 The Stagnation of Physics - 02:41:33 Defining Randomness: The Chaos of 0s and 1s - 02:52:01 The Struggles For Young Mathematicians and Physicists (Advice) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Cornelius (Cornel) Lanczos (February 2, 1893 – June 25, 1974) was a Hungarian-Jewish, Hungarian-American and later Hungarian-Irish mathematician and physicist. According to György Marx he was one of The Martians. He was born in Fehérvár (Alba Regia), Fejér County, Kingdom of Hungary to Jewish parents, Károly Lőwy and Adél Hahn. Lanczos' Ph.D. thesis (1921) was on relativity theory. He sent his thesis copy to Albert Einstein, and Einstein wrote back, saying: "I studied your paper as far as my present overload allowed. I believe I may say this much: this does involve competent and original brainwork, on the basis of which a doctorate should be obtainable ... I gladly accept the honorable dedication." In 1924 he discovered an exact solution of the Einstein field equation representing a cylindrically symmetric rigidly rotating configuration of dust particles. This was later rediscovered by Willem Jacob van Stockum and is known today as the van Stockum dust. It is one of the simplest known exact solutions in general relativity and is regarded as an important example, in part because it exhibits closed timelike curves. Lanczos served as assistant to Albert Einstein during the period of 1928–29. In 1927 Lanczos married Maria Rupp. He was offered a one-year visiting professorship from Purdue University. For a dozen years (1927–39) Lanczos split his life between two continents. His wife Maria Rupp stayed with Lanczos' parents in Székesfehérvár year-around while Lanczos went to Purdue for half the year, teaching graduate students matrix mechanics and tensor analysis. In 1933 his son Elmar was born; Elmar came to Lafayette, Indiana with his father in August 1939, just before WW II broke out.  Maria was too ill to travel and died several weeks later from tuberculosis. When the Nazis purged Hungary of Jews in 1944, of Lanczos' family, only his sister and a nephew survived. Elmar married, moved to Seattle and raised two sons. When Elmar looked at his own firstborn son, he said: "For me, it proves that Hitler did not win." During the McCarthy era, Lanczos came under suspicion for possible communist links. In 1952, he left the U.S. and moved to the School of Theoretical Physics at the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies in Ireland, where he succeeded Erwin Schrödinger and stayed until his death in 1974. In 1956 Lanczos published Applied Analysis. The topics covered include "algebraic equations, matrices and eigenvalue problems, large scale linear systems, harmonic analysis, data analysis, quadrature and power expansions...illustrated by numerical examples worked out in detail." The contents of the book are stylized "parexic analysis lies between classical analysis and numerical analysis: it is roughly the theory of approximation by finite (or truncated infinite) algorithms." Original video ⁠⁠here Full Wikipedia entry ⁠⁠here⁠⁠ Cornelius Lanczos' books ⁠⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger (12 August 1887 – 4 January 1961), sometimes written as Schroedinger or Schrodinger, was a Nobel Prize-winning Austrian and naturalized Irish physicist who developed fundamental results in quantum theory: the Schrödinger equation provides a way to calculate the wave function of a system and how it changes dynamically in time. In addition, he wrote many works on various aspects of physics: statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, physics of dielectrics, color theory, electrodynamics, general relativity, and cosmology, and he made several attempts to construct a unified field theory. In his book What Is Life? Schrödinger addressed the problems of genetics, looking at the phenomenon of life from the point of view of physics. He also paid great attention to the philosophical aspects of science, ancient, and oriental philosophical concepts, ethics, and religion. He also wrote on philosophy and theoretical biology. In popular culture, he is best known for his "Schrödinger's cat" thought experiment. Spending most of his life as an academic with positions at various universities, Schrödinger, along with Paul Dirac, won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1933 for his work on quantum mechanics, the same year he left Germany due to his opposition to Nazism. In his personal life, he lived with both his wife and his mistress which may have led to problems causing him to leave his position at Oxford. Subsequently, until 1938, he had a position in Graz, Austria, until the Nazi takeover when he fled, finally finding a long-term arrangement in Dublin where he remained until retirement in 1955. He died in Vienna of tuberculosis when he was 73. Original video ⁠here⁠⁠ Full Wikipedia entry ⁠here⁠ Erwin Schrödinger's books ⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

WATCH: https://youtu.be/Toq9YLl49KM This conversation is based on an upcoming paper titled "Conscious Agents and the Subatomic World" by Donald Hoffman, Chetan Prakash & Swapan Chattopandhyay. The paper will be published on 24 June, 2023 so this is technically a "sneak peek" of what to expect. Enjoy! Donald Hoffman is Professor Emeritus of Cognitive Sciences at the University of California, Irvine. He received his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He is an author of over 120 scientific papers and three books, including “The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes.” (2019). He has a TED Talk titled “Do We See Reality as It Is?". He received a Distinguished Scientific Award of the American Psychological Association for early career research, the Rustum Roy Award of the Chopra Foundation, and the Troland Research Award of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. His writing has appeared in Scientific American, New Scientist, LA Review of Books, and Edge, and his work has been featured in Wired, Quanta, The Atlantic, Ars Technica, National Public Radio, Discover Magazine, and “Through the Wormhole” with Morgan Freeman. EPISODE LINKS: - Donald's Round 1: https://youtu.be/M5Hz1giUUT8 - Donald's Website: https://www.cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/ - Donald's Books: https://www.amazon.com/Donald-D.-Hoffman/e/B001HPIWAW%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share - Donald's Publications: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=G99fnUgAAAAJ&hl=en - Donald's TED Talk: https://youtu.be/oYp5XuGYqqY CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu - Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (0:44) - Working with Prakash & Chattophadhyay (2:49) - Conscious Agents and the Subatomic World (8:03) - Markovian Dynamical entities beyond Space-Time (10:25) - Donald's new paper (Coming out on 24 June 2023 - link to follow) (11:39) - "CANets" (Conscious Agent Nets - Similar to the Twitterverse) (14:51) - Scientific Community's response to Don's work (19:29) - Don's view of Physicalism & other theories of consciousness (28:00) - Don's on Bernardo Kastrup's work (31:24) - Conscious agents - Decorated Permutations - Particles in Spacetime (35:55) - Erwin Schrödinger's "Mind & Matter" (40:27) - Mathematical Realism (43:11) - A step-by-step run through of each Precise Hypothesis from Don's latest paper. These include 6 very detailed explanations of each hypothesis. (44:28) - Hypothesis 1 (48:59) - Hypothesis 2 (1:17:21) - Hypothesis 3 & 4 (1:28:38) - Hypothesis 5 & 6 (1:37:47) - Future experiments & the wonder of scientific enquiry (1:52:49) - The difference between Don's Idealism (Conscious Realism) & Panpsychism (1:58:42) - Addressing Counter Arguments & Final Thoughts in General (2:10:00) - Conclusion Website · YouTube

Viajemos a 1933 y sigamos las pistas de Annie Besant, G.R.S. Mead, la FUDOSI y la FUDOSFI, Sar Hieronymus, el Círculo Eranos con Olga Fröbe-Kapteyn y Carl Gustav Jung, Erwin Schrödinger ganando el premio Nobel de Física y mucho más. Programa de la serie "Viajemos en el tiempo" del aula abierta de la Orden Rosacruz Iniciática

Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac (8 August 1902 – 20 October 1984) was an English theoretical physicist who is considered to be one of the founders of quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. He was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, a professor of physics at Florida State University and the University of Miami, and a 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics recipient. Dirac made fundamental contributions to the early development of both quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. Among other discoveries, he formulated the Dirac equation which describes the behaviour of fermions and predicted the existence of antimatter. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics with Erwin Schrödinger "for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory". He also made significant contributions to the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics. Dirac was regarded by his friends and colleagues as unusual in character. In a 1926 letter to Paul Ehrenfest, Albert Einstein wrote of a Dirac paper, "I am toiling over Dirac. This balancing on the dizzying path between genius and madness is awful." In another letter concerning the Compton effect he wrote, "I don't understand the details of Dirac at all." Original video ⁠here⁠⁠ Full Wikipedia entry ⁠here⁠ Paul Dirac's books ⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Welcome JLY fam! I have had so many questions about quantum jumping so I thought I'd make a solo episode about what it is, how to do it and my experience with it.If you're interested in a custom QJ meditation, DM on insta!Scientific sources for deeper research:Zlatko Minev, Niels bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Albert EinsteinDOD DOCInsta@iamalexischristine@thejustlikeyoushowTiktok@iam.alexischristine Websitewww.iamalexischristine.com --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/starseedschoolpod/message

Erwin Schrödinger is one of the "fathers of quantum mechanics". He also sexually abused children. Trinity College Dublin recently denamed a lecture theatre that had been named after him - but his name is still on an equation that won the Nobel Prize for physics. And a cat. Writer and historian Subhadra Das recounts how and why you rename a university building, and retired physicist Martin Austwick considers that renaming an eponymous equation or theory might be more difficult than unscrewing a sign from a wall. This is an instalment of the Telling Other Stories series, about renaming. Content note: this episode contains references to  racism and eugenics, and to the sexual abuse of children. There is also a Category B swear. Find out more about this episode and get extra information about the topics therein at theallusionist.org/box, where there's also a transcript. Support the show at theallusionist.org/donate and as well as keeping this independent podcast going, you also get behind-the-scenes glimpses of the show, fortnightly livestreams, special perks at live shows, and best of all the Allusioverse Discord community. Over the next few weeks, we're watching Great Pottery Throwdown together. The Allusionist's online home is theallusionist.org. Stay in touch at facebook.com/allusionistshow, instagram.com/allusionistshow, youtube.com/allusionistshow and twitter.com/allusionistshow, while it still stands. The Allusionist is produced by me, Helen Zaltzman. Martin Austwick provides the original music. Hear Martin's own songs via palebirdmusic.com. Our ad partner is Multitude. To sponsor the show in 2023, contact them at multitude.productions/ads. This episode is sponsored by: • Bombas, whose mission is to make the comfiest clothes ever, and match every item sold with an equal item donated. Go to bombas.com/allusionist to get 20% off your first purchase. • Squarespace, your one-stop shop for building and running a sleek website. Go to squarespace.com/allusionist for a free 2-week trial, and get 10 percent off your first purchase of a website or domain with the code allusionist. • NordVPN is offering exclusivelusionist big discounts: grab the deal on this trusty VPN at nordvpn.com/allusionist, and try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee.Support the show: http://patreon.com/allusionistSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Zaczytywanie się w filozofach zmieniło plany życiowe młodego Wojciecha Sadego. - To mnie wypchnęło poza obręb fizyków – opowiada dziś filozof, profesor na Wydziale Humanistycznym Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Jako student fizyki, zaczął się zastanawiać, jak to jest, że do różnych obszarów rzeczywistości używa się różnych teorii. Skutecznie i praktycznie, ale jednak niespójnie. - Jak jest naprawdę? Która z tych teorii jest bliższa światu? Ja mogłem zadawać sobie takie pytania, bo jakoś zacząłem czytać filozofów. Na swoje nieszczęście, bo mi to uniemożliwiło zostanie fizykiem – dodaje. Bo fizyka to zwykle praktyka. - Typowy fizyk używa tych teorii raz jednej, raz drugiej. Jak opisuje działanie elektrowni wodnej, to najpierw ta woda mu spada na turbinę zgodnie z prawami mechaniki, a potem wytwarza w prądnicy prąd zgodnie z prawami elektrodynamiki. I jakoś tak sobie radzi fizyk, potrafi wygłosić o tym wykład, jakby nie zauważając, że przeskakuje między dwoma zupełnie różnymi sposobami myślenia – zauważa filozof.Proszę jednak nie odczytywać tego opacznie, jakoby fizycy byli niemądrzy. - Dzięki nim mamy tę cywilizację (…) to są niesłychanie inteligentni ludzie, pod pewnymi względami nikt im nie może dorównać – podkreśla prof. Sady. Interesujące połączenie myślenia fizycznego i filozoficznego obserwowaliśmy na przełomie XIX i XX wieku. - Kiedy podstawy fizyki klasycznej zaczęły się kruszyć, wtedy główni uczestnicy tych wydarzeń – i Albert Einstein, i Max Planck, i Niels Bohr, i Werner Heisenberg, i Erwin Schrödinger – oni zostawili po sobie teksty, które my rozpoznajemy jako jakoś filozoficzne – mówi gość Radia Naukowego. Rozmawiamy również o tym czy filozofowie mogą pomóc fizykom, nieco żartujemy z Arystotelesa i zastanawiamy się, czy fizyka rzeczywiście opisuje naturę. Gorąco polecam! *** Odcinek powstał we współpracy z Wydawnictwem Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, wydającego serię „Krótkie wprowadzenie”. Inspiracją do rozmowy jest książka Dawida Wallace'a „Filozofia fizyki”, którą prof. Sady przetłumaczył i opatrzył posłowiem Link do książki: https://wydawnictwo.uni.lodz.pl/produkt/filozofia-fizyki/*** Kanał na YT prof. Sadego: https://www.youtube.com/@wojciechsady480

Inspired by Indian philosophy, famed quantum physicist Erwin Schrödinger had a mind-first, not matter-first, view of the universe. But he was a non-materialist of a rather special kind. He believed that there is only one mind in the universe; our individual minds are like the scattered light from prisms...http://www.troubledminds.org Support The Show! https://www.buymeacoffee.com/troubledminds https://rokfin.com/creator/troubledminds https://troubledfans.com https://patreon.com/troubledmindsRadio Schedule Mon-Tues-Wed-Thurs 7-9pst - https://fringe.fm/iTunes - https://apple.co/2zZ4hx6Spotify - https://spoti.fi/2UgyzqMStitcher - https://bit.ly/2UfAiMXTuneIn - https://bit.ly/2FZOErSTwitter - https://bit.ly/2CYB71UFollow Algo Rhythm -- https://bit.ly/3uq7yRYFollow Apoc -- https://bit.ly/3DRCUEjFollow Ash -- https://bit.ly/3CUTe4ZFollow Daryl -- https://bit.ly/3GHyIaNFollow James -- https://bit.ly/3kSiTEYFollow Jennifer -- https://bit.ly/3BVLyCMFollow Joseph -- https://bit.ly/3pNjbzb Matt's Book -- https://amzn.to/3fqmRWgFollow Nightstocker -- https://bit.ly/3mFGGtxRobert's Book -- https://amzn.to/3GEsFUKFollow TamBam -- https://bit.ly/3LIQkFw--------------------------------------------------https://mindmatters.ai/2022/12/schrodinger-believed-that-there-was-only-one-mind-in-the-universe-2/https://blavatskytheosophy.com/what-exactly-is-the-monad/https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47487/did-erwin-schr%C3%B6dinger-say-there-is-only-one-mind-in-the-universehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monad_%28philosophy%29https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monad_(Gnosticism)https://gods-and-demons.fandom.com/wiki/Monadhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/monadhttps://www.wikiwand.com/en/Monad_(philosophy)https://religion.fandom.com/wiki/Monad_(philosophy)https://slife.org/monad-in-philosophy/https://epochemagazine.org/36/what-is-a-monad-leibnizs-monadology/https://www.monadmanifesto.com/https://www.mind-your-reality.com/universal-mind.htmlhttps://medium.com/@supun.muthutantrige/mind-the-most-powerful-place-in-our-universe-5ea310aa58bahttps://www.svpwiki.com/Mind-The-One-Universal-Substancehttps://universityofmetaphysics.com/you-god-mind-and-the-universe/https://www.philosophy.org/store/p1/The_Universal_One.html#/https://theosophy.wiki/en/Monad

TODAY'S GUEST   Alan Lightman is an American writer, physicist and social entrepreneur. He served on the faculties of Harvard and MIT, and was the first person at MIT to receive dual faculty appointments in science and in the humanities. Currently, he serves as professor for the practice of the humanities at MIT. In his scientific research, he has made fundamental contributions to the astrophysics of black holes and cosmic radiative processes.   He is the author of numerous books, both fiction and nonfiction, including Einstein's Dreams, an international bestseller, The Diagnosis, a finalist for the National Book Award in Fiction, and his latest book, Probable Impossibilities: Musings on Beginnings and Endings, where he discusses questions of nothingness and infinity, the mind, and the specialness of life.   Alan's essays and articles have appeared in the Atlantic, Granta, Harper's, Nautilus, The New Yorker, The New York Review of Books, Salon, and many other publications.   EPISODE SUMMARY   In this conversation we talk about: Growing up in Memphis, Tennessee, and living between physics and the humanities. What it was like to study physics at Princeton and Caltech. Working with Richard Feynman. Writing Einstein's Dreams. The connection between physics and spirituality. The topics of entropy and life. The rarity of life. On nothingness and infinity. On the value of wasting time, and many other topics.   This conversation with Alan Lightman is one of a dozen or more upcoming conversations with bestselling authors, thinkers, designers, scientists, and makers who are reimagining our world and experience. So please follow us on your favorite podcasting app, if you haven't already, so that you can make sure you don't miss them.   And now, let's jump right in with Alan Lightman.   TIMESTAMP CHAPTERS   [3:12] Life During COVID [6:40] Early Influences [12:42] On Writing and the Origin of Einstein's Dreams [17:53] A Convergence Between Physics and Spirituality [19:42] The Origin of the Universe [24:40] The Rarity of Life [29:06] A Distinction Between Life and Death [33:26] Nothingness and Infinity [36:39] Finding Meaning in a Multiverse [39:34] The Benefit of Wasting Time [42:33] A Sermon on Disconnection   EPISODE LINKS Alan's Links

Kim talks with George Gibson about Schrödinger's cat. This cat is a thought experiment proposed by Erwin Schrödinger, and taken up in correspondence with Albert Einstein, in the 1930s. Schrödinger's original paper on the subject, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik” (Naturwissenschaften 23 no. 48 (November 1935): 807–812) doi: 10.1007/BF01491891 was translated by John D. Trimmer and published as “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's ‘Cat Paradox' Paper.” (Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, No. 5 (Oct. 1980): 323-338) . Schrödinger presents the cat as something of a joke. George Gibson is a professor of physics at the University of Connecticut and an excellent pianist. Image: “Leo was rescued off the streets of Harlem 3.5 years ago and has lived comfortably in a town house with two humans ever since.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Kim talks with George Gibson about Schrödinger's cat. This cat is a thought experiment proposed by Erwin Schrödinger, and taken up in correspondence with Albert Einstein, in the 1930s. Schrödinger's original paper on the subject, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik” (Naturwissenschaften 23 no. 48 (November 1935): 807–812) doi: 10.1007/BF01491891 was translated by John D. Trimmer and published as “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's ‘Cat Paradox' Paper.” (Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, No. 5 (Oct. 1980): 323-338) . Schrödinger presents the cat as something of a joke. George Gibson is a professor of physics at the University of Connecticut and an excellent pianist. Image: “Leo was rescued off the streets of Harlem 3.5 years ago and has lived comfortably in a town house with two humans ever since.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kim talks with George Gibson about Schrödinger's cat. This cat is a thought experiment proposed by Erwin Schrödinger, and taken up in correspondence with Albert Einstein, in the 1930s. Schrödinger's original paper on the subject, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik” (Naturwissenschaften 23 no. 48 (November 1935): 807–812) doi: 10.1007/BF01491891 was translated by John D. Trimmer and published as “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's ‘Cat Paradox' Paper.” (Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, No. 5 (Oct. 1980): 323-338) . Schrödinger presents the cat as something of a joke. George Gibson is a professor of physics at the University of Connecticut and an excellent pianist. Image: “Leo was rescued off the streets of Harlem 3.5 years ago and has lived comfortably in a town house with two humans ever since.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science

Kim talks with George Gibson about Schrödinger's cat. This cat is a thought experiment proposed by Erwin Schrödinger, and taken up in correspondence with Albert Einstein, in the 1930s. Schrödinger's original paper on the subject, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik” (Naturwissenschaften 23 no. 48 (November 1935): 807–812) doi: 10.1007/BF01491891 was translated by John D. Trimmer and published as “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's ‘Cat Paradox' Paper.” (Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, No. 5 (Oct. 1980): 323-338) . Schrödinger presents the cat as something of a joke. George Gibson is a professor of physics at the University of Connecticut and an excellent pianist. Image: “Leo was rescued off the streets of Harlem 3.5 years ago and has lived comfortably in a town house with two humans ever since.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

¿De qué habla la teoría cuántica? Desde finales de la década de 1920 sabemos que puede interpretarse como una teoría de probabilidades, que no nos habla exactamente de los objetos físicos, sino de qué información podemos extraer de ellos – o, visto de otra manera, de cuáles van a ser los resultados de los experimentos que podemos hacer sobre los objetos físicos. En aquel momento esta interpretación dejó muy insatisfechos a algunos físicos, entre ellos Albert Einstein y Erwin Schrödinger, que trataron de explorar ideas alternativas. ¿Y si la cuántica era sólo una "versión deficiente" de verdadera teoría física? Quizá, con un poco de trabajo, podríamos encontrar una teoría satisfactoria, que nos hablase realmente de las sillas y las mesas, y no de los experimentos que podemos hacer con sillas y mesas. Tal vez esa teoría estaría desprovista de probabilidades y nos sabría decir con verdadera certeza dónde están los objetos y cuáles son sus propiedades. Llamamos a esas posibles "teorías maestras de la física" teorías de variables ocultas. Este año el Nobel de Física ha premiado a tres investigadores, Alain Aspect, John Clauser y Anton Zeilinger, que diseñaron los experimentos que demostraron que las teorías de variables ocultas no pueden existir. O, al menos, no pueden existir en la forma en que Einstein y otros querían. En el programa de hoy os hablamos de este debate sobre el corazón de la teoría cuántica, que empezó con Albert Einstein y Niels Bohr y que, con algunos cambios, llega hasta la actualidad. Con ello –esperamos– arrojaremos un poco de luz sobre el Nobel de este año. Para ello contamos con la ayuda de Francis Villatoro, divulgador y profesor en la Universidad de Málaga, y autor del blog La Ciencia de la Mula Francis. Si queréis leer el artículo de Francis con sus "quinielas" para los Nobel de este año, lo tenéis aquí: https://francis.naukas.com/2022/10/01/predicciones-de-los-premios-nobel-de-2022/ Y aquí tenéis el artículo que escribió sobre el Nobel de Física, una vez se hubo concedido: https://francis.naukas.com/2022/10/04/premio-nobel-de-fisica-2022-aspect-clauser-y-zeilinger-por-ser-pioneros-del-uso-del-entrelazamiento-cuantico-en-informacion-cuantica/ Si queréis aprender más sobre las propiedades cuánticas y cómo desafían el "sentido común" del mundo macroscópico repasad los capítulos s01e43, s02e15, s02e47 y s03e08 de Aparici en Órbita. También encontraréis algunos episodios interesantes en nuestro pódcast hermano, La Brújula de la Ciencia; por ejemplo, en el s05e01 explicamos uno de estos experimentos para poner a prueba las teorías de variables ocultas (el primero que se consiguió hacer libre de resquicios, en el año 2015); o también los capítulos s01e29, s07e40, s01e09, s11e47 y s10e22. Este programa se emitió originalmente el 6 de octubre de 2022. Podéis escuchar el resto de audios de Más de Uno en la app de Onda Cero y en su web, ondacero.es

Wee Black Bees by Little John Nee, originally commissioned as part of Drama On One's Science Season. In this drama, we join blues musician, Sparkplug, as he grapples with heartbreak, the welfare of bee populations and the writings of the physicist Erwin Schrödinger.

ពហុចក្រវាល ឬ​ហៅ​ជាភាសាអង់គ្លេស​ថា « Multiverse » គឺជា​ប្រធានបទ​ដ៏​ពេញ​និយម​មួយ ​នៅ​ក្នុង​ការជជែក​វែកញែកគ្នា ក៏ដូចជា​នៅ​ក្នុង​រឿង​ប្រលោមលោក ឬ​ខ្សែភាពយន្ត។ ថ្វីដ្បិតតែមកទល់នឹង​សព្វថ្ងៃ​នេះ គ្មាន​ភស្តុតាង​ណាមួយ​ដែល​អាច​បញ្ជាក់​បាន​ពិតប្រាកដ​ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ ពហុចក្រវាល​នេះ​មិនមែនជា​រឿង​ប្រឌិត​​សុទ្ធសាធ​នោះតែ តែវាមាន​មូលដ្ឋាន​លើ​ទ្រឹស្តី​​វិទ្យាសាស្រ្ត​ចម្បងមួយ គឺចេញ​ពី​ទ្រឹស្តី​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក។ តើចក្រវាល​មាន​តែមួយ​គត់ ឬ​ក៏​ក្រៅ​ពី​ចក្រវាល​របស់​យើង​នេះ នៅ​​មាន​ចក្រវាលច្រើន​ផ្សេងទៀត? តើ​អាច​ជា​រឿងទៅរួចទេ ដែល​អ្វីៗ​ដែល​មាន​នៅ​ក្នុ​ងចក្រវាល​របស់​យើង​នេះ (កាឡាក់ស៊ី ភពផែនដី មនុស្ស​យើង​) អាច​មានស្រដៀងគ្នា​នៅ​ក្នុង​ចក្រវាល​ជាច្រើន​​ផ្សេងទៀត? តើ​អាច​ទេ ដែល​មនុស្ស​ម្នាក់ៗ​អាច​​​មាន​វត្តមាន​​ នៅ​ក្នុង​​ចក្រវាល​ច្រើន​ផ្សេងៗគ្នា ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ មាន​ជោគវាសនា មាន​គន្លង​ជីវិតខុសៗគ្នា? យោងតាម​ទ្រឹស្តី​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក អាតូម ក៏ដូចជា​ភាគល្អិតផ្សេងទៀត នៅក្នុង​ពិភពកង់ទិក អាច​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ក្នុង​ទីតាំងច្រើនផ្សេងគ្នា ឬ​ក្នុង​សភាព​ខុសៗគ្នា​ក្នុងពេល​តែមួយ ដែល​គេ​ហៅ​ជាភាសា​អង់គ្លេស​ថា « Superposition »។ នេះ​ជា​លក្ខណៈ​ដ៏ចម្លែក​មួយ​នៃ​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក ដែល​ជាទូទៅ​ត្រូវ​បាន​លើកបង្ហាញ​តាមរយៈ​ពិសោធន៍​អំពី​សត្វឆ្មា​​របស់ Erwin Schrödinger។ យោងតាមពិសោធន៍​នេះ សត្វឆ្មា​ដែល​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ក្នុង​ហឹបបិទជិត​ត្រូវស្ថិត​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាព Superposition គឺ​ស្លាប់ផង និង​រស់​ផង ក្នុងពេលតែមួយ។ រហូត​ទាល់តែ​ក្រោយ​ពេលដែល​យើង​បើក​ហឹបនេះមើល ទើប​ជោគវាសនា​របស់​សត្វឆ្មា​ត្រូវ​បាន​កំណត់ គឺ​ឬមួយ​ឆ្មាស្លាប់ ឬមួយឆ្មា​នៅ​រស់។ យោងតាម​បិតាស្ថាបនិក​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក​ពីររូប គឺ Niels Bohr និង Werner Heisenberg ចំណុចគន្លឹះ ដែល​នាំ​ឲ្យ​ Superposition របស់​សត្វឆ្មា​ត្រូវ​បញ្ចប់ គឺ​ការសង្កេត និង​វាស់វែង។ មុនពេលមាន​ការ​សង្កេត និង​វាស់វែង គ្រប់អ្វីៗ​ទាំងអស់​​នៅ​ជា​រលក​នៃ​ប្រូបាប៊ីលីតេ (Quantum Wave Function) ដោយ​គោរព​ទៅតាម​​សមីការ Schrödinger។ នៅពេលដែល​មាន​ការ​សង្កេត និង​វាស់វែង​មើល វា​តម្រូវ​ឲ្យ​រលកនៃ​ប្រូបាប៊ីលីតេ​ត្រូវ​បញ្ចប់ (Wave function collapse) ហើយ​តម្រូវ​ឲ្យ​​អាតូម ឬ​ក៏​ភាគល្អិត​ក្រោម​អាតូម​ត្រូវ​​មាន​អត្ថិភាព​នៅ​ក្នុង​ទីតាំង​ណាមួយ ឬ​នៅ​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាព​ណាមួយ​ជាក់លាក់។ នេះ​ជា​ការ​បកស្រាយ​មួយ ទៅលើ​ទ្រឹស្តី​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក ដែលគេ​ច្រើន​ហៅ​ជាភាសាអង់គ្លេស​ថា Copenhagen interpretation។ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ យោងតាម​ការ​បកស្រាយ​មួយទៀត ដែលស្នើឡើង​ដោយ​រូបវិទូអាមេរិក Hugh Everett Superposition នៃ​មេកានិក​កង់ទិក ត្រូវ​បន្ត​​ទៅមុខ​ជាអចិន្ត្រៃយ៍ ដោយ​មិន​ត្រូវ​បញ្ចប់​ដោយ​ការ​សង្កេត និង​វាស់វែង​ណាមួយ​​នោះទេ ហើយ​រលក​កង់ទិក ឬ Wave Function គឺ​ជា​គោលការណ៍​គ្រឹះ​នៃ​មេកានិក​កង់ទិក ដែល​មាន​លក្ខណៈអចិន្ត្រៃយ៍ ដោយ​គ្មាន​ការបញ្ចប់ (Wave function collapse) ដូច​ការបកស្រាយ​ទៅតាម Copenhagen interpretation នោះទេ។ នៅ​ក្នុងករណី​ Schrödinger's Cat បើយោងទៅតាម​ការ​បកស្រាយ​របស់ Hugh Everett គេមិន​អាច​បែងចែកដាច់ពីគ្នា រវាង​អ្វីដែល​នៅ​ក្នុងហឹបថា​ជា​មេកានិក​កង់ទិក ហើយអ្វី​ដែល​នៅ​ក្រៅហឹបថា​ជា​មេកានិក​ក្លាស៊ិក​បាននោះទេ។ ឆ្មា និង​អាតូម​ដែល​នៅ​ក្នុងហឹប​ស្ថិត​ក្រោម​ច្បាប់​កង់ទិក មនុស្ស​យើង​ដែល​នៅ​ក្រៅហឹប ហើយ​ដែល​ផ្សំឡើង​ពី​អាតូម និង​ភាគល្អិត​ក្រោម​អាតូម​ដូចគ្នា ក៏​ត្រូវតែ​ស្ថិត​ក្រោម​ច្បាប់​កង់ទិក​ដូចគ្នា​នេះដែរ។ ដូចគ្នា​ដែរ​ចំពោះ​បរិស្ថាន​ដែល​នៅ​ជុំវិញ ទាំង​បរិស្ថាន​នៅ​ក្នុងហឹប និង​បរិស្ថាន​​នៅ​ក្រៅហឹប ដែល​សុទ្ធតែ​ផ្សំឡើង​ដោយ​អាតូម និង​ភាគល្អិត​ក្រោម​អាតូម ក៏​សុទ្ធតែ​ត្រូវ​ស្ថិត​ក្រោម​ច្បាប់​កង់ទិក​ដូចគ្នាទាំងអស់។ ដូច្នេះ បើ​ឆ្មា​ដែល​នៅ​ក្នុងហឹប​​ស្ថិត​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាព Superposition នៅពេលដែល​យើងបើក​ហឹបនេះ​មើល យើង​ក៏​​ស្ថិត​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាព Superposition នៃ​មេកានិក​កង់ទិក​នេះ​ដូចគ្នា។ Superposition របស់​ឆ្មា គឺ​ឆ្មា​ស្លាប់​​ផង និង​ឆ្មា​នៅរស់​​ផងក្នុងពេលតែមួយ ហើយ Superposition របស់​យើង គឺ​​​យើង​បើក​ហឹបមើល​ឃើញ​ឆ្មា​ស្លាប់ផង និង​យើង​ឃើញ​ឆ្មា​នៅ​រស់​ផង ​ក្នុងពេលតែមួយ។ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ នៅ​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាព​ជាក់ស្តែង យើង​មិន​អាច​ដឹង​ខ្លួន​ថា យើង​មើល​ឃើញ​ឆ្មា​ស្លាប់​ផង និង​ឆ្មា​នៅ​រស់ផង ពីព្រោះថា ​យោង​ទៅតាម​គោលការណ៍​ពីរទៀត​នៃ​មេកានិក​កង់ទិក គោលការណ៍ដែល​គេ​ហៅ​ជា​ភាសា​អង់គ្លេស​ថា Quantum Decoherence និង Quantum Entanglement ទាំង​ឆ្មា ទាំង​យើង និង​ទាំង​បរិស្ថាន​ដែល​នៅ​ជុំវិញ​ខ្លួនយើង ត្រូវ​ស្ថិត​ក្នុងស្ថានភាព Superposition ដែល​បែកខ្នែង​ចេញ​ទៅជា​ពិភព​ពីរ​ដាច់​ពីគ្នា ឯករាជ្យ​ដាច់ចេញ​​ពី​គ្នា ដោយ​​គ្មាន​ព័ត៌មាន​ឆ្លង​គ្នា​ពី​ពិភពមួយទៅពិភពមួយទៀតបាននោះទេ។ ដូច្នេះ បើ​យោងទៅតាម​ការ​បកស្រាយ​របស់ Hugh Everett នៅក្នុង​ពិភពមួយ ឬ​ចក្រវាល​មួយ ​យើង​បើកហឹប​​​មើលឃើញ​ឆ្មា​ស្លាប់ ហើយ​នៅ​ក្នុងពេល​ទន្ទឹម​គ្នា​នេះ នៅ​ក្នុង​ចក្រវាល​មួយផ្សេងទៀត ​យើងបើក​ហឹប​​​មើលឃើញ​ឆ្មា​នៅ​រស់ ហើយ​​ចក្រវាល​ទាំងពីរ​នេះ ថ្វីដ្បិត​តែ​​​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ទន្ទឹមគ្នា ក្នុងពេល​តែមួយ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ ឯករាជ្យ​ដាច់ចេញ​ពី​គ្នា។ ការបកស្រាយ​របស់ Hugh Everett ទៅលើ​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក​នេះ ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​ស្គាល់​ជាទូទៅ​ជា​ភាសា​អង់គ្លេស​ថា  Many-worlds interpretation ហើយ​ការបកស្រាយ​នេះ​ហើយ ដែល​ជា​មូលដ្ឋាន​​គ្រឹះ​មួយ ដែល​កំណត់​ថា ចក្រវាល​ត្រូវ​​មាន​​ច្រើន គឺ​អាច​មានចំនួន​​ច្រើន​ដោយគ្មាន​ដែន​កំណត់៕

នៅឆ្នាំ១៩២៤ អ្នកប្រាជ្ញ​រូបវិទ្យាបារាំង Louis de Broglie បាន​រកឃើញ​ទ្រឹស្តី ដែលលើកឡើង​ថា អេឡិចត្រុង​គឺ​ជា​រលកផង និង​ជា​ភាគល្អិតផង (Wave-particle duality) ហើយ​ពីរឆ្នាំក្រោយមកទៀត អ្នកប្រាជ្ញ​រូបវិទ្យាអូទ្រីស Erwin Schrödinger បាន​រកឃើញ​សមីការ ដែល​បញ្ជាក់អំពី​រលកកង់ទិក ហើយ​ដែល​ជា​មូលដ្ឋាន​គ្រឹះ​នៃ​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក។ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ មិនយូរប៉ុន្មានក្រោយមក Schrödinger បាន​សង្កេតឃើញ​ភាព​ចម្លែក​នៃ​ទ្រឹស្តី​កង់ទិក​នេះ ហើយ​បានបញ្ជាក់ អំពី​ភាពចម្លែក​នេះ តាមរយៈឧទាហរណ៍​អំពី​សត្វឆ្មារ (Schrödinger's cat)។ ជិត២០ឆ្នាំក្រោយ​ពី​អាញស្តាញ​ចុះផ្សាយ​ទ្រឹស្តី ដែល​បង្ហាញ​ថា ពន្លឺ ដែល​កាល​ពីមុន​គេ​ធ្លាប់​តែ​គិត​ថា​ជា​រលក ត្រូវ​ផ្សំឡើង​ដោយ​បណ្តុំថាមពល​ជា​ភាគល្អិត គឺ​ហ្វូតុង នៅឆ្នាំ១៩២៤ រូបវិទូបារាំង​ឈ្មោះ ល្វី ដឺប្រឺយ (Louis de Broglie) នៅក្នុងនិក្ខេបបទ​បញ្ចប់​ការ​សិក្សា​ថ្នាក់​​បណ្ឌិត​​ បាន​លើកឡើង​នូវទ្រឹស្តី​មួយ​ថា អេឡិចត្រុង ដែល​គេ​ស្គាល់​តាំងពីដើម​មក​ថា​ជា​ភាគល្អិត​នោះ បែរ​ជា​មាន​លក្ខណៈ​ជា​រលក​ទៅវិញ។ មែនទែនទៅ យោងតាម​ទ្រឹស្តី​របស់ ល្វី ដឺប្រឺយ អេឡិចត្រុង ក៏ដូចជា​ភាគល្អិត​ផ្សេងទៀតដែរ គឺ​មាន​លក្ខណៈ​ជា​ភាគល្អិតផង និង​ជា​រលកផង ទ្រឹស្តី ដែលគេហៅ​ជាភាសាអង់គ្លេស​ថា Wave-particle duality។ នៅឆ្នាំ១៩២៦ រូបវិទូ​អូទ្រីសឈ្មោះ Erwin Schrödinger បាន​សិក្សាស្រាវជ្រាវលម្អិត​ ទៅលើ​ទ្រឹស្តី​រលកអេឡិចត្រុង​របស់ ល្វី ដឺប្រឺយ ហើយ​បានរកឃើញ​សមីការ ដែល​អាច​ពិពណ៌នា និង​ព្យាករ​អំពី​ដំណើរវិវឌ្ឍ​របស់​រលកអេឡិចត្រុង ក៏ដូចជា ភាគល្អិត​ផ្សេងទៀត នៅ​ក្នុង​កម្រិត​កង់ទិក។ សមីការនេះ​ត្រូវបាន​ស្គាល់ជាទូទៅថា “សមីការ Schrödinger” (Schrödinger equation) ហើយ​ដែល​ជា​មូលដ្ឋានគ្រឹះចម្បងបំផុត​នៃ​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក។ គេ​អាច​និយាយ​ដោយ​ប្រៀបធៀបគ្នា​បាន​ថា ច្បាប់​ចលនា​នៃ​មេកានិក​ក្លាស៊ិក គឺ​មាន​សមីការ​របស់​អ៊ីសាក់ញូតុន​​ជា​មូលដ្ឋានគ្រឹះ រីឯមេកានិក​កង់ទិក​វិញ សមីការ​ជា​មូលដ្ឋានគ្រឹះ​ចម្បង​បំផុត គឺ​​សមីការ​របស់ Schrödinger។ នៅ​ក្នុង​មេកានិក​ក្លាស៊ិក សមីការ​របស់​ញូតុន ជា​គន្លឹះ​ក្នុងការ​ពិពណ៌នា និង​ព្យាករ​​យ៉ាងសុក្រឹត​ អំពី​ចលនា​របស់​ភព ផ្កាយ និង​កាឡាក់ស៊ី ចំណែក​នៅក្នុង​មេកានិក​កង់ទិកវិញ សមីការ​របស់ Schrödinger គឺ​ជា​គន្លឹះ​ក្នុងការ​ពិពណ៌នា និង​ព្យាករ​ អំពី​អាតូម និង​ភាគល្អិត​ក្រោម​អាតូម។ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ ផ្ទុយស្រឡះ​ពី​មេកានិក​ក្លាស៊ិក ដែល​ការព្យាករ​អាច​ធ្វើ​ឡើង​បាន​យ៉ាង​​ជាក់លាក់ នៅ​ក្នុង​មេកានិក​កង់ទិកវិញ សមីការរលកកង់ទិក​​អាច​ឲ្យ​គេ​ព្យាករ​បាន​ត្រឹមតែ​ជា​ប្រូបាប៊ីលីតេ​តែប៉ុណ្ណោះ មានន័យថា នៅ​ក្នុង​ពិភពកង់ទិក អេឡិចត្រុង ក៏ដូចជា​ភាគល្អិត​ផ្សេងទៀតដែរ មិនមាន​អត្ថិភាព​ពិតប្រាកដ​នោះទេ ដោយ​គេ​​មិន​អាចកំណត់​បាន​ច្បាស់លាស់​​ថា វា​មាន​ចលនា​បែបណា ទៅទិសខាងណា ឬ​​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ទីតាំង​ណាមួយ​ពិតប្រាកដ​នោះ​ទេ។ មែនទែនទៅ គេ​មិនត្រឹមតែ​មិន​អាច​ដឹង​ថា អេឡិចត្រុង​ស្ថិតនៅទីតាំង​ណាមួយ ឬ​ក្នុង​សភាពបែបណាមួយ​ពិតប្រាកដ​នោះទេ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ ទៅតាម​គោលការណ៍​​នៃ​មេកានិកកង់ទិក អេឡិចត្រុង​អាច​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ក្នុងទីតាំងច្រើន​ផ្សេងគ្នា ឬ​ក្នុង​សភាពខុសគ្នា​​ក្នុងពេលតែមួយ​ ដែលគេ​ហៅ​ជា​ភាសា​អង់គ្លេស​ថា « Superposition »។ នេះ​គឺ​ជា​ភាពចម្លែក ដែលសូម្បីតែ Erwin Schrödinger ខ្លួនឯងផ្ទាល់ ក៏ពិបាក​នឹង​ទទួល​យក ហើយ​ដើម្បី​បង្ហាញ​ពី​ភាពចម្លែក​នេះ Erwin Schrödinger បានលើកឡើង អំពី​ពិសោធន៍​ទៅលើ​សត្វឆ្មារ ដែលគេតែងតែ​ស្គាល់​ជា​ភាសាអង់គ្លេស​ថា Schrödinger's cat។ នៅក្នុងពិសោធន៍​របស់ Schrödinger ​នេះ គេ​យក​សត្វឆ្មារ​មួយក្បាល​ទៅដាក់​នៅ​ក្នុង​ហឹប​បិទជិត ដោយ​នៅ​ក្នុង​ហឹបនោះ មាន​ផ្ទុកសារធាតុវិទ្យុសកម្ម ដែល​​អាតូម​របស់​វា​អាច​មាន​បម្រែបម្រួល​វិទ្យុសកម្ម (Radioactive decay) ក្នុង​​ប្រូបាប៊ីលីតេ ៥០%-៥០% ពោលគឺ ប្រូបាប៊ីលីតេ ៥០% ដែល​វា​បំភាយវិទ្យុសកម្ម ហើយ ៥០% មិនបំភាយ​វិទ្យុសកម្ម។ នៅ​ក្នុង​ហឹបនោះដែរ គេ​ដាក់​​​ដបឧស្ម័នពុល ដោយ​មាន​យន្តការពិសេស ភ្ជាប់​ជាមួយនឹង​ឧបករណ៍​ចាប់សញ្ញាវិទ្យុសកម្ម។ ប្រសិនបើ​មាន​ការ​បំភាយ​វិទ្យុសកម្ម យន្តការពិសេស​នឹង​បញ្ចេញ​ឧស្ម័នពុល​ ហើយ​សត្វឆ្មារ​នឹង​ត្រូវ​ស្លាប់។ ផ្ទុយ​ទៅវិញ បើ​សិន​ជា​គ្មាន​ការ​បំភាយវិទ្យុសកម្ម​ទេ ឧស្ម័នពុល​​ក៏​នឹង​មិន​ត្រូវ​បំភាយចេញ ហើយ​សត្វឆ្មារ​ត្រូវ​នៅ​រស់។ និយាយជារួម ជោគវាសនា​របស់​សត្វឆ្មារ​ត្រូវ​ផ្សាភ្ជាប់​ទៅនឹង​អាតូម គឺ​មាន​ប្រូបាប៊ីលីតេ ៥០% ឆ្មារ​ត្រូវ​ស្លាប់ ហើយ ៥០% ឆ្មារ​នៅ​រស់។ យោងទៅតាម​គោលការណ៍​​នៃ​រូបវិទ្យាកង់ទិក ដរាបណា​គេមិនទាន់​បើកហឹប​នេះ​មើលទេ អាតូម​ត្រូវ​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាពពីរ​ក្នុងពេលតែមួយ គឺ​បំភាយវិទ្យុសកម្ម និង​មិនបំភាយវិទ្យុសកម្ម ហើយ​ដោយសារ​តែ​ជោគវាសនា​របស់​សត្វឆ្មារ​ត្រូវ​ផ្សាភ្ជាប់​នឹង​អាតូម ដូច្នេះ សត្វឆ្មារ​ក៏​ត្រូវ​ស្ថិត​ក្នុង​ស្ថានភាពពីរ​ក្នុងពេលតែមួយ​ដូចគ្នា គឺ​ស្លាប់ផង និង​នៅ​រស់​ផង។ រហូត​ទាល់តែ​ដល់​ពេល​ដែល​គេ​បើក​ហឹបនោះមើល ទើប​គេ​ឃើញឆ្មារស្លាប់ ឬ​ឆ្មារនៅរស់។ ស្ថានភាព Superposition គឺ ឆ្មារ​អាច​នៅរស់ផង និង​ស្លាប់ផង ក្នុងពេលតែមួយ​នេះហើយ ដែល​ជា​រឿង​ដ៏​សែនចម្លែក ដែល Erwin Schrödinger គិត​ថា វា​គឺ​ជា​រឿង​ដែល​មិន​សមហេតុផល ហើយ​មិន​អាច​​ទៅរួច៕

佇你揤這粒開關進前，未來猶有兩種宇宙通揀。等你揤這粒開關了後，你就會活 tī 唯一 ê 一个宇宙矣。遮是彼个有名 ê Schrödinger 的貓咪仔 ê 網路實驗。你若是 kā 這幅圖內底太空人 提咧 ê 彼張圖 ê 紅色開關揤落去，這幅圖會有兩款結果：一款是太空人提著一隻活--ê 貓咪仔，一款是太空人提著一隻死--去 ê 貓咪仔。你揤落去彼陣，你大腦 ê 腦波 kah 你 ê 電子設備會 tī 毫秒短 ê 時間內鬥空好勢，產生一个應該是 量子力學 主導 ê 隨機結果。有一寡人相信講，你個人發起 ê 量子決定，會 kā 宇宙分做兩个，活--ê 貓咪仔 kah 死--去 ê 貓咪仔 會 tī 較大 ê 多重宇宙 內底 ê 無仝宇宙同齊存在。另外一寡人相信講，你揤開關彼陣，就會用一款你進前無法度預測 ê 方式，kā 兩个可能 ê 宇宙 合做 一个矣。閣有一寡人相信講，宇宙 是古典、確定 ê。所以你揤開關彼陣，袂 kā 宇宙分做兩个，干焦會 kā 自開始就決定 ê 結果揤出來爾爾。咱 逐工一幅天文圖 相信講，毋管這件代誌是偌爾 白痴，你猶是會揤這粒開關。毋管出現佗一个結果，你應該攏會思考一下仔人生。抑是兩下仔！ ——— 這是 NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day ê 台語文 podcast 原文版：https://apod.nasa.gov/ 台文版：https://apod.tw/ 今仔日 ê 文章： https://apod.tw/daily/20220424/ 影像：NASA, Erwin Schrödinger's cat 音樂：P!SCO - 鼎鼎 聲優：阿錕 翻譯：An-Li Tsai (NCU) 原文：https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap220424.html Powered by Firstory Hosting

Think out 1,000 or 10,000 years; it's obvious to everyone that human civilization (if it lasts) will make unimaginable leaps in science and technology in that time. On the other hand, there's a general sense (judging from the way we imagine the future) that our worldview won't (or shouldn't) change in any meaningful way. Is that really true? This podcast looks at the idea that I think most desperately needs an update, our collective understanding of selfhood. The update I lay out is actually quite an ancient idea; it just needs to be dusted off and re-examined in light of new science and a new era. Here are some places it's appeared before, most notably in Hinduism and Sikhism: Upanishads- 2000 or more years old, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upanishads Advaita Vedanta- 1500 years old, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita... Guru Granth Sahib- ~500 years old, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru_Gr... Alan Watts, “We are God playing Hide and Seek with Itself”, https://youtu.be/tmFxDy8S8Lo?t=194 Bertrand Russell on Heraclitus, ~500 B.C.: “"Mortals are immortals, and immortals are mortals, the one living the other's death and dying the other's life." There is unity in the world, but it is a unity formed by the combination of opposites. "All things come out of the one, and the one out of all things."” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Histo... Many other traditions in this vein are discussed in Huxley's “The Perennial Philosophy”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Per... Bill Hicks: https://youtu.be/VnwFmaLiKl4?t=88 Virginia Woolf: https://www.themarginalian.org/2020/0... Erwin Schrödinger in "Mind and Matter" https://books.google.com/books/about/... The Pew Research studies mentioned early in the podcast are: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank... https://www.pewforum.org/2018/05/29/a... 0:00 Introduction 0:51 Reexamining selfhood 5:18 Who am I? 9:33 Why should this all matter to you? (Excerpt from Schrödinger's "Mind and Matter"): "The reason why our sentient, percipient and thinking ego is met nowhere within our scientific world picture can easily be indicated in seven words: because it is itself that world picture. It is identical with the whole and therefore cannot be contained in it as a part of it. But, of course, here we knock against the arithmetical paradox; there appears to be a great multitude of these conscious egos, the world however is only one... There are two ways out of the number paradox, both appearing rather lunatic from the point of view of present scientific thought (based on ancient Greek thought and thus thoroughly 'Western'). One way out is the multiplication of the world in Leibniz's fearful doctrine of monads: every monad to be a world by itself, no communication between them; the monad 'has no windows', it is 'incommunicado'. That none the less they all agree with each other is called 'pre- established harmony'. I think there are few to whom this suggestion appeals, nay who would consider it as a mitigation at all of the numerical antinomy. There is obviously only one alternative, namely the unification of minds or consciousnesses. Their multiplicity is only apparent, in truth there is only one mind. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not only of the Upanishads. The mystically experienced union with God regularly entails this attitude unless it is opposed by strong existing prejudices; and this means that it is less easily accepted in the West than in the East."

What we believed were the laws of physics and matter are really the archetypal laws of mind, and the condensation of consciousness that created our universe originated from a dimensionless point in the void known in physics as the “Singularity” and in mathematics and philosophy as the “Monad. In philosophy, the Monad is the is the indivisible source that created our reality. In mathematics, it is the origin of all numbers and geometry that describe Nature. In science, the Monad is the Big Bang explosion of consciousness, which physicist Erwin Schrödinger described as “a singularity phasing within all beings.” This podcast covers "The Monad Manifesto," which is chapter 1 of The Monad Manifesto: An Existential Survival Guide (2022) by Dennis William Hauck. Read by Zira DV.

In 1935, the famous physicist Erwin Schrödinger was debating with his friend Albert Einstein about the nature of a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics – a field that was, at the time, still very new. To illustrate his point, Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment wherein a (rather unfortunate) cat sealed in a box is both alive and dead simultaneously – up until the moment someone opens the box. Decades later, that abstract paradox is still very much alive, and enabling the development of a new generation of computers. These quantum computers use bits (called qubits) that, unlike the binary bits in today's electronics, can simultaneously exist in many states between on and off. And although the word gets overused in science, this emerging technology really is revolutionary. A fully developed quantum computer is predicted to be able to perform calculations that would be impossible for a traditional supercomputer, even with thousands of years of processing time.In this episode, our experts chat about the current state of quantum computers and explain why the mind-bending theories of quantum make coming to work a lot of fun.Featuring:Irfan Siddiqi is a professor at UC Berkeley, where he leads the Quantum Nanoelectronics Laboratory, a collaborative group dedicated to developing new and improved superconducting qubits. He is also a faculty scientist at Berkeley Lab, where he leads the Advanced Quantum Testbed and the Quantum Systems Accelerator – a DOE National Quantum Information Science Research Center.Zahra Pedramrazi is a project scientist at the Advanced Quantum Testbed. During her physics undergraduate, she took a quantum class with Irfan, and became hooked on the field. She is currently focused on the fabrication of superconducting qubits, working to refine their design in order to overcome the limitations of current qubits."Thus, the task is, not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees." ― Erwin Schrödinger“How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress.” ― Niels Bohr