Podcast appearances and mentions of Srinivasa Ramanujan

Srinivasa Ramanujan hat einen eigenen Zugang zur Mathematik. Weil er Autodidakt ist und die konventionellen Regeln des Fachs nicht kennt, folgt er seiner Intuition — und schreibt damit Geschichte. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:06) Einleitung (00:02:59) Indiens Mathematik-Tradition (00:04:46) Ramanujans Jugend und mathematische Prägung (00:09:59) Ramanujans Karriere: Intuition statt Konvention (00:16:38) Einmal England und zurück (00:19:20) Die „Taxicab-Number“: 1729 (00:25:41) Die Formel und der Zufallsfund (00:29:38) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-srinivasa-ramanujan

Srinivasa Ramanujan hat einen eigenen Zugang zur Mathematik. Weil er Autodidakt ist und die konventionellen Regeln des Fachs nicht kennt, folgt er seiner Intuition — und schreibt damit Geschichte. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:06) Einleitung (00:02:59) Indiens Mathematik-Tradition (00:04:46) Ramanujans Jugend und mathematische Prägung (00:09:59) Ramanujans Karriere: Intuition statt Konvention (00:16:38) Einmal England und zurück (00:19:20) Die „Taxicab-Number“: 1729 (00:25:41) Die Formel und der Zufallsfund (00:29:38) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-srinivasa-ramanujan

Srinivasa Ramanujan hat einen eigenen Zugang zur Mathematik. Weil er Autodidakt ist und die konventionellen Regeln des Fachs nicht kennt, folgt er seiner Intuition — und schreibt damit Geschichte. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:06) Einleitung (00:02:59) Indiens Mathematik-Tradition (00:04:46) Ramanujans Jugend und mathematische Prägung (00:09:59) Ramanujans Karriere: Intuition statt Konvention (00:16:38) Einmal England und zurück (00:19:20) Die „Taxicab-Number“: 1729 (00:25:41) Die Formel und der Zufallsfund (00:29:38) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-srinivasa-ramanujan

Srinivasa Ramanujan was a mathematical genius who left an indelible mark on the world of mathematics. Born in India in 1887, he had an innate ability for numbers and discovered his own theorems without any formal training. Ramanujan's work, often compared to that of great mathematicians, provided insights into number theory, infinite series, and mathematical analysis. Despite facing initial challenges and skepticism, his brilliance was eventually recognized, leading to collaborations with renowned mathematicians like G.H. Hardy. Ramanujan's legacy lives on, showcasing the extraordinary potential of untapped mathematical talent. CreditsCredit: CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/: Trinity College: Stanley Howe / Whewell's Court, Trinity College, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Whewell%27s_Court,_Trinity_College,_Cambridge.jpg Chennai Central: jamal haider, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chennai_Central.jpg The Man Who Knew Infinity / Warner Bros. Pictures and co-producers Animation is created by Bright Side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music from TheSoul Sound: https://thesoul-sound.com/ Check our Bright Side podcast on Spotify and leave a positive review! https://open.spotify.com/show/0hUkPxD34jRLrMrJux4VxV Subscribe to Bright Side: https://goo.gl/rQTJZz ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Social Media: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/brightside Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/brightside.official TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@brightside.official?lang=en Stock materials (photos, footages and other): https://www.depositphotos.com https://www.shutterstock.com https://www.eastnews.ru ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For more videos and articles visit: http://www.brightside.me Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Artificial Intelligence Podcast: Read the notes at at podcastnotes.org. Don't forget to subscribe for free to our newsletter, the top 10 ideas of the week, every Monday --------- Narendra Modi is the Prime Minister of India. On YouTube this episode is available in English, Hindi, Russian (and soon other languages). Captions and voice-over audio tracks are provided (for the main episode video on YouTube) in English, Hindi, Russian, and the original mixed-language version, with subtitles available in your preferred language. To listen to the original mixed-language version, please select the Hindi (Latin) audio track. The default is English overdub. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep460-sc See below for timestamps, transcript, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. Transcript: https://lexfridman.com/narendra-modi-transcript CONTACT LEX: Feedback - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey AMA - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama Hiring - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring Other - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact EPISODE LINKS: Narendra Modi's X: https://x.com/narendramodi Narendra Modi's Instagram: https://instagram.com/narendramodi Narendra Modi's YouTube: https://youtube.com/narendramodi Narendra Modi's Website: https://narendramodi.in/ SPONSORS: To support this podcast, check out our sponsors & get discounts: Brain.fm: Music for focus. Go to https://brain.fm/lex Shopify: Sell stuff online. Go to https://shopify.com/lex MasterClass: Online classes from world-class experts. Go to https://masterclass.com/lexpod NetSuite: Business management software. Go to http://netsuite.com/lex AG1: All-in-one daily nutrition drinks. Go to https://drinkag1.com/lex LMNT: Zero-sugar electrolyte drink mix. Go to https://drinkLMNT.com/lex OUTLINE: (00:00) - Introduction (17:24) - Fasting (29:42) - Early life (41:38) - Advice to Young People (47:20) - Journey in the Himalayas (58:50) - Becoming a monk (1:00:37) - RSS and Hindu nationalism (1:08:22) - Explaining India (1:12:32) - Mahatma Gandhi (1:24:27) - Path to peace in Ukraine (1:27:41) - India and Pakistan (1:33:21) - Cricket and Football (1:37:45) - Donald Trump (1:48:56) - China and Xi Jinping (1:56:01) - Gujarat riots in 2002 (2:11:37) - Biggest democracy in the world (2:21:53) - Power (2:26:39) - Hard work (2:29:46) - Srinivasa Ramanujan (2:31:53) - Decision-making process (2:39:40) - AI (2:49:55) - Education (3:00:10) - Learning and focus (3:06:01) - Mantra (3:07:45) - Meditation (3:13:43) - Lex visiting India (3:18:08) - Siddhartha

Narendra Modi is the Prime Minister of India. On YouTube this episode is available in English, Hindi, Russian (and soon other languages). Captions and voice-over audio tracks are provided (for the main episode video on YouTube) in English, Hindi, Russian, and the original mixed-language version, with subtitles available in your preferred language. To listen to the original mixed-language version, please select the Hindi (Latin) audio track. The default is English overdub. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep460-sc See below for timestamps, transcript, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. Transcript: https://lexfridman.com/narendra-modi-transcript CONTACT LEX: Feedback - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey AMA - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama Hiring - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring Other - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact EPISODE LINKS: Narendra Modi's X: https://x.com/narendramodi Narendra Modi's Instagram: https://instagram.com/narendramodi Narendra Modi's YouTube: https://youtube.com/narendramodi Narendra Modi's Website: https://narendramodi.in/ SPONSORS: To support this podcast, check out our sponsors & get discounts: Brain.fm: Music for focus. Go to https://brain.fm/lex Shopify: Sell stuff online. Go to https://shopify.com/lex MasterClass: Online classes from world-class experts. Go to https://masterclass.com/lexpod NetSuite: Business management software. Go to http://netsuite.com/lex AG1: All-in-one daily nutrition drinks. Go to https://drinkag1.com/lex LMNT: Zero-sugar electrolyte drink mix. Go to https://drinkLMNT.com/lex OUTLINE: (00:00) - Introduction (17:24) - Fasting (29:42) - Early life (41:38) - Advice to Young People (47:20) - Journey in the Himalayas (58:50) - Becoming a monk (1:00:37) - RSS and Hindu nationalism (1:08:22) - Explaining India (1:12:32) - Mahatma Gandhi (1:24:27) - Path to peace in Ukraine (1:27:41) - India and Pakistan (1:33:21) - Cricket and Football (1:37:45) - Donald Trump (1:48:56) - China and Xi Jinping (1:56:01) - Gujarat riots in 2002 (2:11:37) - Biggest democracy in the world (2:21:53) - Power (2:26:39) - Hard work (2:29:46) - Srinivasa Ramanujan (2:31:53) - Decision-making process (2:39:40) - AI (2:49:55) - Education (3:00:10) - Learning and focus (3:06:01) - Mantra (3:07:45) - Meditation (3:13:43) - Lex visiting India (3:18:08) - Siddhartha

Prof. Subbarao Kambhampati argues that while LLMs are impressive and useful tools, especially for creative tasks, they have fundamental limitations in logical reasoning and cannot provide guarantees about the correctness of their outputs. He advocates for hybrid approaches that combine LLMs with external verification systems. MLST is sponsored by Brave: The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api. TOC (sorry the ones baked into the MP3 were wrong apropos due to LLM hallucination!) [00:00:00] Intro [00:02:06] Bio [00:03:02] LLMs are n-gram models on steroids [00:07:26] Is natural language a formal language? [00:08:34] Natural language is formal? [00:11:01] Do LLMs reason? [00:19:13] Definition of reasoning [00:31:40] Creativity in reasoning [00:50:27] Chollet's ARC challenge [01:01:31] Can we reason without verification? [01:10:00] LLMs cant solve some tasks [01:19:07] LLM Modulo framework [01:29:26] Future trends of architecture [01:34:48] Future research directions Youtube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1WnHpedi2A Refs: (we didn't have space for URLs here, check YT video description instead) Can LLMs Really Reason and Plan? On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigation Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planning On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Tasks LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve "Task Success" is not Enough Partition function (number theory) (Srinivasa Ramanujan and G.H. Hardy's work) Poincaré conjecture Gödel's incompleteness theorems ROT13 (Rotate13, "rotate by 13 places") A Mathematical Theory of Communication (C. E. SHANNON) Sparks of AGI Kambhampati thesis on speech recognition (1983) PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Change Explainable human-AI interaction Tree of Thoughts On the Measure of Intelligence (ARC Challenge) Getting 50% (SoTA) on ARC-AGI with GPT-4o (Ryan Greenblatt ARC solution) PROGRAMS WITH COMMON SENSE (John McCarthy) - "AI should be an advice taker program" Original chain of thought paper ICAPS 2024 Keynote: Dale Schuurmans on "Computing and Planning with Large Generative Models" (COT) The Hardware Lottery (Hooker) A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligence (JEPA/LeCun) AlphaGeometry FunSearch Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models Language models are not naysayers (Negation in LLMs) The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A" Embracing negative results

Todos nós nos sentimos inspirados em histórias de superação, onde pessoas conseguem vencer as adversidades e mostrar o seu valor. Na ciência não é diferente, filmes como "O Gênio Indomável", onde um jovem pobre e sem estudos mostra-se mais capaz e inteligente que os mais renomados doutores são garantia de sucesso. Apresentado por Sofia Massaro, o programa de hoje traz um desses personagens. Mesmo sem nenhuma formação acadêmica e muito jovem, o indiano Srinivasa Ramanujan supreendeu o mundo com suas descobertas na matemática. Ele se tornou o mais jovem cientista a ser aceito na Academia Real de Ciência (Royal Society) do Reino Unido e sua inteligência e vastas contribuições são comparadas a nomes como Leonard Euler. Quer saber mais sobre? Escute esse episódio!Hoje é dia do "Influencers da Ciência", um Spin-Off do podcast "Intervalo de Confiança". Neste programa trazemos o nome de Influencers que de fato trouxeram algo de positivo para a sociedade, aqueles que expandiram as fronteiras do conhecimento científico e hoje permitiram o desenvolvimento de diversas áreas.A Pauta foi escrita por André Moreira. A edição foi feita por Leo Oliveira e a vitrine do episódio feita por Tatiane do Vale em colaboração com as Inteligências Artificiais Dall-E, da OpenAI. A coordenação de redação e de redes sociais é de Tatiane do Vale. A seleção de cortes é de responsabilidade Júlia Frois, a direção de Comunidade de Sofia Massaro e a gerência financeira é de Kézia Nogueira. As vinhetas de todos os episódios foram compostas por Rafael Chino e Leo Oliveira.Visite nosso site em: https://intervalodeconfianca.com.br/Conheça nossa loja virtual em: https://intervalodeconfianca.com.br/lojaPara apoiar esse projeto: https://intervalodeconfianca.com.br/apoieSiga nossas redes sociais:- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iconfpod/- Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/IntervalodeConfianca- Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/iconfpod- X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/iConfPod

The Crisis in Psychotherapy: Reclaiming Its Soul in the Age of Neoliberalism" Summary: Explore the identity crisis facing psychotherapy in today's market-driven healthcare system. Learn how neoliberal capitalism and consumerism have shaped our understanding of self and mental health. Discover why mainstream therapy often reinforces individualistic self-constructions and how digital technologies risk reducing therapy to scripted interactions. Understand the need for psychotherapy to reimagine its approach, addressing social and political contexts of suffering. Join us as we examine the urgent call for a psychotherapy of liberation to combat the mental health toll of late capitalism and build a more just, caring world. Hashtags: #PsychotherapyCrisis #MentalHealthReform #NeoliberalismAndTherapy #TherapyRevolution #SocialJusticeInMentalHealth #CriticalPsychology #HolisticHealing #TherapeuticLiberation #ConsumerismAndMentalHealth #PsychotherapyFuture #CapitalismAndMentalHealth #DeepTherapy #TherapyAndSocialChange #MentalHealthActivism #PsychologicalEmancipation   Key Points: Psychotherapy is facing an identity and purpose crisis in the era of market-driven healthcare, as depth, nuance, and the therapeutic relationship are being displaced by cost containment, standardization, and mass-reproducibility. This crisis stems from a shift in notions of the self and therapy's aims, shaped by the rise of neoliberal capitalism and consumerism. The “empty self” plagued by inner lack pursues fulfillment through goods, experiences, and attainments. Mainstream psychotherapy largely reinforces this alienated, individualistic self-construction. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and manualized treatments focus narrowly on “maladaptive” thoughts and behaviors without examining broader contexts. The biomedical model's hegemony views psychological struggles as brain diseases treated pharmacologically, individualizing and medicalizing distress despite research linking it to life pains like poverty, unemployment, trauma, and isolation. Digital technologies further the trend towards disembodied, technocratic mental healthcare, risking reducing therapy to scripted interactions and gamified inputs. The neoliberal transformation of psychotherapy in the 1970s, examined by sociologist Samuel Binkley, aligned the dominant therapeutic model centered on personal growth and self-actualization with a neoliberal agenda that cast individuals as enterprising consumers responsible for their own fulfillment. To reclaim its emancipatory potential, psychotherapy must reimagine its understanding of the self and psychological distress, moving beyond an intrapsychic focus to grapple with the social, political, and existential contexts of suffering. This transformation requires fostering critical consciousness, relational vitality, collective empowerment, and aligning with movements for social justice and systemic change. The struggle to reimagine therapy is inseparable from the struggle to build a more just, caring, and sustainable world. A psychotherapy of liberation is urgently needed to address the mental health toll of late capitalism. The neoliberal restructuring of healthcare and academia marginalized psychotherapy's humanistic foundations, subordinating mental health services to market logic and elevating reductive, manualized approaches. Psychotherapy's capitulation to market forces reflects a broader disenchantment of politics by economics, reducing the complexities of mental distress to quantifiable, medicalized entities and eviscerating human subjectivity. While intuitive and phenomenological approaches are celebrated in other scientific fields like linguistics and physics, they are often dismissed in mainstream psychology, reflecting an aversion to knowledge that resists quantification. Psychotherapy should expand its understanding of meaningful evidence, making room for intuitive insights, subjective experiences, and phenomenological explorations alongside quantitative data. Academic psychology's hostility towards Jungian concepts, even as neurology revalidates them under different names, reflects hypocrisy and a commitment to familiar but ineffective models. To reclaim its relevance, psychotherapy must reconnect with its philosophical and anthropological roots, reintegrating broader frameworks to develop a more holistic understanding of mental health beyond symptom management. How Market Forces are Shaping the Practice and Future of Psychotherapy The field of psychotherapy faces an identity and purpose crisis in the era of market-driven healthcare. As managed care, pharmaceutical dominance, and the biomedical model reshape mental health treatment, psychotherapy's traditional foundations – depth, nuance, the therapeutic relationship – are being displaced by the imperatives of cost containment, standardization, and mass-reproducibility. This shift reflects the ascendancy of a neoliberal cultural ideology reducing the complexity of human suffering to decontextualized symptoms to be efficiently eliminated, not a meaningful experience to be explored and transformed. In “Constructing the Self, Constructing America,” cultural historian Philip Cushman argues this psychotherapy crisis stems from a shift in notions of the self and therapy's aims. Individual identity and psychological health are shaped by cultural, economic and political forces, not universal. The rise of neoliberal capitalism and consumerism birthed the “empty self” plagued by inner lack, pursuing fulfillment through goods, experiences, and attainments – insecure, inadequate, fearing to fall behind in life's competitive race. Mainstream psychotherapy largely reinforces this alienated, individualistic self-construction. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and manualized treatment focus narrowly on “maladaptive” thoughts and behaviors without examining social, political, existential contexts. Packaging therapy into standardized modules strips away relational essence for managed care's needs. Therapists become technicians reinforcing a decontextualized view locating problems solely in the individual, overlooking unjust social conditions shaping lives and psyches. Central is the biomedical model's hegemony, viewing psychological struggles as brain diseases treated pharmacologically – a seductive but illusory promise. Antidepressant use has massively grown despite efficacy and safety doubts, driven by pharma marketing casting everyday distress as a medical condition, not deeper malaise. The model individualizes and medicalizes distress despite research linking depression to life pains like poverty, unemployment, trauma, isolation. Digital technologies further the trend towards disembodied, technocratic mental healthcare. Online therapy platforms and apps expand access but risk reducing therapy to scripted interactions and gamified inputs, not genuine, embodied attunement and meaning-making. In his book “Getting Loose: Lifestyle Consumption in the 1970s,” sociologist Samuel Binkley examines how the social transformations of the 1970s, driven by the rise of neoliberalism and consumer culture, profoundly reshaped notions of selfhood and the goals of therapeutic practice. Binkley argues that the dominant therapeutic model that emerged during this period – one centered on the pursuit of personal growth, self-actualization, and the “loosening” of the self from traditional constraints – unwittingly aligned itself with a neoliberal agenda that cast individuals as enterprising consumers responsible for their own fulfillment and well-being. While ostensibly liberatory, this “getting loose” ethos, Binkley contends, ultimately reinforced the atomization and alienation of the self under late capitalism. By locating the source of and solution to psychological distress solely within the individual psyche, it obscured the broader social, economic, and political forces shaping mental health. In doing so, it inadvertently contributed to the very conditions of “getting loose” – the pervasive sense of being unmoored, fragmented, and adrift – that it sought to alleviate. Binkley's analysis offers a powerful lens for understanding the current crisis of psychotherapy. It suggests that the field's increasing embrace of decontextualized, technocratic approaches to treatment is not merely a capitulation to market pressures, but a logical extension of a therapeutic paradigm that has long been complicit with the individualizing logic of neoliberalism. If psychotherapy is to reclaim its emancipatory potential, it must fundamentally reimagine its understanding of the self and the nature of psychological distress. This reimagining requires a move beyond the intrapsychic focus of traditional therapy to one that grapples with the social, political, and existential contexts of suffering. It means working to foster critical consciousness, relational vitality, and collective empowerment – helping individuals to deconstruct the oppressive narratives and power structures that constrain their lives, and to tap into alternative sources of identity, belonging, and purpose. Such a transformation is not just a matter of therapeutic technique, but of political and ethical commitment. It demands that therapists reimagine their work not merely as a means of alleviating individual symptoms, but as a form of social and political action aimed at nurturing personal and collective liberation. This means cultivating spaces of collective healing and visioning, and aligning ourselves with the movements for social justice and systemic change. At stake is nothing less than the survival of psychotherapy as a healing art. If current trends persist, our field will devolve into a caricature of itself, a hollow simulacrum of the ‘branded, efficient, quality-controlled' treatment packages hocked by managed care. Therapists will be relegated to the role of glorified skills coaches and symptom-suppression specialists, while the deep psychic wounds and social pathologies underlying the epidemic of mental distress will metastasize unchecked. The choice before us is stark: Do we collude with a system that offers only the veneer of care while perpetuating the conditions of collective madness? Or do we commit ourselves anew to the still-revolutionary praxis of tending psyche, dialoguing with the unconscious, and ‘giving a soul to psychiatry' (Hillman, 1992)? Ultimately, the struggle to reimagine therapy is inseparable from the struggle to build a more just, caring, and sustainable world. As the mental health toll of late capitalism continues to mount, the need for a psychotherapy of liberation has never been more urgent. By rising to this challenge, we open up new possibilities for resilience, regeneration, and revolutionary love – and begin to create the world we long for, even as we heal the world we have. The Neoliberal Transformation of Psychotherapy The shift in psychotherapy's identity and purpose can be traced to the broader socioeconomic transformations of the late 20th century, particularly the rise of neoliberalism under the Reagan and Thatcher administrations. Neoliberal ideology, with its emphasis on privatization, deregulation, and the supremacy of market forces, profoundly reshaped the landscapes of healthcare and academia in which psychotherapy is embedded. As healthcare became increasingly privatized and profit-driven, the provision of mental health services was subordinated to the logic of the market. The ascendancy of managed care organizations and private insurance companies created powerful new stakeholders who saw psychotherapy not as a healing art, but as a commodity to be standardized, packaged, and sold. Under this market-driven system, the value of therapy was reduced to its cost-effectiveness and its capacity to produce swift, measurable outcomes. Depth, nuance, and the exploration of meaning – the traditional heart of the therapeutic enterprise – were casualties of this shift. Concurrent with these changes in healthcare, the neoliberal restructuring of academia further marginalized psychotherapy's humanistic foundations. As universities increasingly embraced a corporate model, they became beholden to the same market imperatives of efficiency, standardization, and quantification. In this milieu, the kind of research and training that could sustain a rich, multi-faceted understanding of the therapeutic process was devalued in favor of reductive, manualized approaches more amenable to the demands of the market. This academic climate elevated a narrow caste of specialists – often far removed from clinical practice – who were empowered to define the parameters of legitimate knowledge and practice in the field. Beholden to the interests of managed care, the pharmaceutical industry, and the biomedical establishment, these “experts” played a key role in cementing the hegemony of the medical model and sidelining alternative therapeutic paradigms. Psychotherapy training increasingly reflected these distorted priorities, producing generations of therapists versed in the language of symptom management and behavioral intervention, but often lacking a deeper understanding of the human condition. As researcher William Davies has argued, this neoliberal transformation of psychotherapy reflects a broader “disenchantment of politics by economics.” By reducing the complexities of mental distress to quantifiable, medicalized entities, the field has become complicit in the evisceration of human subjectivity under late capitalism. In place of a situated, meaning-making self, we are left with the hollow figure of “homo economicus” – a rational, self-interested actor shorn of deeper psychological and spiritual moorings. Tragically, the public discourse around mental health has largely been corralled into this narrow, market-friendly mold. Discussions of “chemical imbalances,” “evidence-based treatments,” and “quick fixes” abound, while more searching explorations of the psychospiritual malaise of our times are relegated to the margins. The result is a flattened, impoverished understanding of both the nature of psychological distress and the possibilities of therapeutic transformation. Psychotherapy's capitulation to market forces is thus not merely an abdication of its healing potential, but a betrayal of its emancipatory promise. By uncritically aligning itself with the dominant ideology of our age, the field has become an instrument of social control rather than a catalyst for individual and collective liberation. If therapy is to reclaim its soul, it must begin by confronting this history and imagining alternative futures beyond the neoliberal horizon. Intuition in Other Scientific Fields Noam Chomsky's groundbreaking work in linguistics and cognitive science has long been accepted as scientific canon, despite its heavy reliance on intuition and introspective phenomenology. His theories of deep grammatical structures and an innate language acquisition device in the human mind emerged not from controlled experiments or quantitative data analysis, but from a deep, intuitive engagement with the patterns of human language and thought. Yet while Chomsky's ideas are celebrated for their revolutionary implications, similar approaches in the field of psychotherapy are often met with skepticism or outright dismissal. The work of Carl Jung, for instance, which posits the existence of a collective unconscious and universal archetypes shaping human experience, is often relegated to the realm of pseudoscience or mysticism by the mainstream psychological establishment. This double standard reflects a deep-seated insecurity within academic and medical psychology about engaging with phenomena that resist easy quantification or empirical verification. There is a pervasive fear of straying too far from the narrow confines of what can be measured, controlled, and reduced to standardized formulas. Ironically, this insecurity persists even as cutting-edge research in fields like neuroscience and cognitive psychology increasingly validates many of Jung's once-marginalized ideas. Concepts like “implicit memory,” “event-related potentials,” and “predictive processing” bear striking resemblances to Jungian notions of the unconscious mind, while advanced brain imaging techniques confirm the neurological basis of personality frameworks like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Yet rather than acknowledging the pioneering nature of Jung's insights, the psychological establishment often repackages these ideas in more palatable, “scientific” terminology. This aversion to intuition and subjective experience is hardly unique to psychotherapy. Across the sciences, there is a widespread mistrust of knowledge that cannot be reduced to quantifiable data points and mathematical models. However, some of the most transformative scientific advances have emerged from precisely this kind of intuitive, imaginative thinking. Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, for instance, emerged not from empirical data, but from a thought experiment – an act of pure imagination. The physicist David Bohm's innovative theories about the implicate order of the universe were rooted in a profoundly intuitive understanding of reality. And the mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan attributed his brilliant insights to visions from a Hindu goddess – a claim that might be dismissed as delusional in a clinical context, but is celebrated as an expression of his unique genius. Psychotherapy should not abandon empirical rigor or the scientific method, but rather expand its understanding of what constitutes meaningful evidence. By making room for intuitive insights, subjective experiences, and phenomenological explorations alongside quantitative data and experimental findings, the field can develop a richer, more multidimensional understanding of the human mind and the process of psychological transformation. This expansive, integrative approach is necessary for psychotherapy to rise to the challenges of our time – the crisis of meaning and authenticity in an increasingly fragmented world, the epidemic of mental illness and addiction, and the collective traumas of social oppression and ecological devastation. Only by honoring the full spectrum of human knowledge and experience can we hope to catalyze the kind of deep, lasting change that our world so desperately needs. It is a particular vexation of mine that academic psychology is so hostile to the vague but perennial ideas about the unconscious that Jung and others posited. Now neurology is re-validating Jungian concepts under different names like “implicit memory”, “event-related potentials”, and “secondary and tertiary consciousness”, while qEEG brain maps are validating the underlying assumptions of the Jungian-derived MBTI. Yet the academy still cannot admit they were wrong and Jung was right, even as they publish papers in “premiere” academic journals like The Lancet that denounce Jung as pseudoscience while repurposing his ideas. This is another example of hypocrisy. Academia seems to believe its publications have innate efficacy and ethics as long as the proper rituals of psychological research are enacted. If you cite your sources, review recent literature in your echo chamber, disclose financial interests, and profess ignorance of your profession's history and the unethical systems funding your existence, then you are doing research correctly. But the systems paying for your work and existence are not mere “financial interests” – that's just business! This is considered perfectly rational, as long as one doesn't think too deeply about it. Claiming “I don't get into that stuff” or “I do academic/medical psychology” has become a way to defend oneself from not having a basic understanding of how humans and cultures are traumatized or motivated, even while running universities and hospitals. The attitude seems to be: “Let's just keep handing out CBT and drugs for another 50 years, ‘rationally' and ‘evidence-based' of course, and see how much worse things get in mental health.” No wonder outcomes and the replication crisis worsen every year, even as healthcare is ostensibly guided by rational, empirical forces. Academia has created a model of reality called science, applied so single-mindedly that they no longer care if the outcomes mirror those of the real world science was meant to serve! Academic and medical psychology have created a copy of the world they interact with, pretending it reflects reality while it fundamentally cannot, due to the material incentives driving it. We've created a scientific model meant to reflect reality, but mistake it for reality itself. We reach in vain to move objects in the mirror instead of putting the mirror away and engaging with what's actually there. How do we not see that hyper-rationalism is just another form of religion, even as we tried to replace religion with it? This conception of psychology is not only an imaginary model, but actively at war with the real, cutting us off from truly logical, evidence-based pathways we could pursue. It wars with objective reality because both demand our total allegiance. We must choose entirely between the object and its reflection, god and idol. We must decide if we want the uncertainty of real science or the imaginary sandbox we pretend is science. Adherence to this simulacrum in search of effective trauma and mental illness treatments has itself become a cultural trauma response – an addiction to the familiar and broken over the effective and frightening. This is no different than a cult or conspiracy theory. A major pillar of our civilization would rather perpetuate what is familiar and broken than dare to change. Such methodological fundamentalism is indistinguishable from religious devotion. We have a group so committed to their notion of the rational that they've decided reason and empiricism should no longer be beholden to reality. How is our approach to clinical psychology research any different than a belief in magic? The deflections of those controlling mainstream psychology should sound familiar – they are the same ego defenses we'd identify in a traumatized therapy patient. Academic psychology's reasoning is starting to resemble what it would diagnose as a personality disorder: “It's not me doing it wrong, even though I'm not getting the results I want! It's the world that's wrong by not enabling my preferred approach. Effective practitioners must be cheating or deluded. Those who do it like me are right, though none of us get good results. We'd better keep doing it our way, but harder.” As noted in my Healing the Modern Soul series, I believe that since part of psychology's role is to functionally define the “self”, clinical psychology is inherently political. Material forces will always seek to define and control what psychology can be. Most healthy definitions of self threaten baseless tradition, hierarchy, fascism, capital hoarding, and the co-opting of culture to manipulate consumption. Our culture is sick, and thus resistant to a psychology that would challenge its unhealthy games with a coherent sense of self. Like any patient, our culture wants to deflect and fears the first step of healing: admitting you have a problem. That sickness strokes the right egos and lines the right pockets, a societal-scale version of Berne's interpersonal games. Our current psychological paradigm requires a hierarchy with one group playing sick, emotional child to the other's hyper-rational, all-knowing parent. The relationship is inherently transactional, and we need to make it more authentic and collaborative. I have argued before  that one of the key challenges facing psychotherapy today is the fragmentation and complexity of modern identity. In a globalized, digitally-connected world, we are constantly navigating a myriad of roles, relationships, and cultural contexts, each with its own set of expectations and demands. Even though most people would agree that our system is bad the fragmentary nature of the postmodern has left us looking through a kaleidoscope. We are unable to agree on hero, villain, cause, solution, framework or label. This fragmentation leads to a sense of disconnection and confusion, a feeling that we are not living an authentic or integrated life. The task of psychotherapy, in this context, is to help individuals develop a more coherent and resilient sense of self, one that can withstand the centrifugal forces of modern existence. Psychotherapy can become a new mirror to cancel out the confusing reflections of the kaleidoscope. We need a new better functioning understanding of self in psychology for society to see the self and for the self to see clearly our society. The Fragmentation of Psychotherapy: Reconnecting with Philosophy and Anthropology To reclaim its soul and relevance, psychotherapy must reconnect with its philosophical and anthropological roots. These disciplines offer essential perspectives on the nature of human existence, the formation of meaning and identity, and the cultural contexts that shape our psychological realities. By reintegrating these broader frameworks, we can develop a more holistic and nuanced understanding of mental health that goes beyond the narrow confines of symptom management. Many of the most influential figures in the history of psychotherapy have argued for this more integrative approach. Irvin Yalom, for instance, has long championed an existential orientation to therapy that grapples with the fundamental questions of human existence – death, freedom, isolation, and meaninglessness. Erik Erikson's psychosocial theory of development explicitly situated psychological growth within a broader cultural and historical context. Peter Levine's work on trauma healing draws heavily from anthropological insights into the body's innate capacity for self-regulation and resilience. Carl Jung, perhaps more than any other figure, insisted on the inseparability of psychology from broader humanistic inquiry. His concepts of the collective unconscious and archetypes were rooted in a deep engagement with mythology, anthropology, and comparative religion. Jung understood that individual psychological struggles often reflect larger cultural and spiritual crises, and that healing must address both personal and collective dimensions of experience. Despite the profound insights offered by these thinkers, mainstream psychotherapy has largely ignored their calls for a more integrative approach. The field's increasing alignment with the medical model and its pursuit of “evidence-based” treatments has led to a narrow focus on standardized interventions that can be easily quantified and replicated. While this approach has its merits, it often comes at the cost of deeper engagement with the philosophical and cultural dimensions of psychological experience. The relationship between psychology, philosophy, and anthropology is not merely a matter of academic interest – it is essential to the practice of effective and meaningful therapy. Philosophy provides the conceptual tools to grapple with questions of meaning, ethics, and the nature of consciousness that are often at the heart of psychological distress. Anthropology offers crucial insights into the cultural shaping of identity, the diversity of human experience, and the social contexts that give rise to mental health challenges. By reconnecting with these disciplines, psychotherapy can develop a more nuanced and culturally informed approach to healing. This might involve: Incorporating philosophical inquiry into the therapeutic process, helping clients explore questions of meaning, purpose, and values. Drawing on anthropological insights to understand how cultural norms and social structures shape psychological experience and expressions of distress. Developing more holistic models of mental health that account for the interconnectedness of mind, body, culture, and environment. Fostering dialogue between psychotherapists, philosophers, and anthropologists to enrich our understanding of human experience and suffering. Training therapists in a broader range of humanistic disciplines to cultivate a more integrative and culturally sensitive approach to healing. The reintegration of philosophy and anthropology into psychotherapy is not merely an academic exercise – it is essential for addressing the complex psychological challenges of our time. As we grapple with global crises like climate change, political polarization, and the erosion of traditional sources of meaning, we need a psychology that can engage with the big questions of human existence and the cultural forces shaping our collective psyche. By reclaiming its connections to philosophy and anthropology, psychotherapy can move beyond its current crisis and reclaim its role as a vital force for individual and collective healing. In doing so, it can offer not just symptom relief, but a deeper engagement with the fundamental questions of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex and interconnected world. References: Binkley, S. (2007). Getting loose: Lifestyle consumption in the 1970s. Duke University Press. Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Chaimani, A., Atkinson, L. Z., Ogawa, Y., … & Geddes, J. R. (2018). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet, 391(10128), 1357-1366. Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Davies, W. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Sage. Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?. John Hunt Publishing. Hillman, J. (1992). The thought of the heart and the soul of the world. Spring Publications. Kirsch, I. (2010). The emperor's new drugs: Exploding the antidepressant myth. Basic Books. Layton, L. (2009). Who's responsible? Our mutual implication in each other's suffering. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(2), 105-120. Penny, L. (2015). Self-care isn't enough. We need community care to thrive. Open Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/selfcare-isnt-enough-we-need-community-care-to-thrive/ Rose, N. (2019). Our psychiatric future: The politics of mental health. John Wiley & Sons. Samuels, A. (2014). Politics on the couch: Citizenship and the internal life. Karnac Books. Shedler, J. (2018). Where is the evidence for “evidence-based” therapy?. Psychiatric Clinics, 41(2), 319-329. Sugarman, J. (2015). Neoliberalism and psychological ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(2), 103. Watkins, M., & Shulman, H. (2008). Toward psychologies of liberation. Palgrave Macmillan. Whitaker, R. (2010). Anatomy of an epidemic: Magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of mental illness in America. Broadway Books. Winerman, L. (2017). By the numbers: Antidepressant use on the rise. Monitor on Psychology, 48(10), 120. Suggested further reading: Bordo, S. (2004). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. University of California Press. Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. WW Norton & Company. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Publishing. Fanon, F. (2007). The wretched of the earth. Grove/Atlantic, Inc. Foucault, M. (1988). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. Vintage. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury publishing USA. Fromm, E. (1955). The sane society. Routledge. Hari, J. (2018). Lost connections: Uncovering the real causes of depression–and the unexpected solutions. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Herman, J. L. (2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence–from domestic abuse to political terror. Hachette UK. hooks, b. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge. Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Univ of California Press. Laing, R. D. (1960). The divided self: An existential study in sanity and madness. Penguin UK. Martín-Baró, I. (1996). Writings for a liberation psychology. Harvard University Press. McKenzie, K., & Bhui, K. (Eds.). (2020). Institutional racism in psychiatry and clinical psychology: Race matters in mental health. Springer Nature. Metzl, J. M. (2010). The protest psychosis: How schizophrenia became a black disease. Beacon Press. Orr, J. (2006). Panic diaries: A genealogy of panic disorder. Duke University Press. Scaer, R. (2014). The body bears the burden: Trauma, dissociation, and disease. Routledge. Szasz, T. S. (1997). The manufacture of madness: A comparative study of the inquisition and the mental health movement. Syracuse University Press. Taylor, C. (2012). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge University Press. Teo, T. (2015). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance. American Psychologist, 70(3), 243. Tolleson, J. (2011). Saving the world one patient at a time: Psychoanalysis and social critique. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 9(2), 160-170.

Each season on Decoded, we demystify a nebulous concept in commerce. In this season of Decoded, presented by FERMÀT, Phillip sits down with Rabah Rahil, the CMO at FERMÀT, to examine the legacy of these prolific thinkers, inventors, and polymaths, philosophers, and mathematicians whose work inspired Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, and Bill Gates. One of these inspirations from the past is the mathemetician Srinivasa Ramanujan. Listen now!The best time to be excellent, and the worst time to be average.{00:08:07} - “The first lesson we could learn {from Srinivasa Ramanujan} is becoming your own self-advocate, especially in your career, and understanding that maybe you have a talent and an intuition that can be useful for others.” - Phillip{00:10:12} - “Outside of an Ivy or if you want to go study under a professor, I think academia isn't a lot of times the path for you because I think a lot of times when you have these innate geniuses, if you would have taken them through an academic establishment, the creativity would have been beaten out of them. Because when you think of academics, it's very conformist.” - Rabah{00:13:50} - “I would rather hire people that have had a bunch of failures and pick themselves back up versus people that have never failed. Because I found those people that have never failed are candidly just quite soft.” - Rabah{00:17:05} - “Some truths look like universal laws in one context. But if you zoom out to a bigger context, the law doesn't hold true anymore. The law is broken from a different point of view.” - Phillip{00:24:38} - “When you lack conviction, you can be convinced that your intuition is wrong.” - Phillip{00:29:55} - “The cheat code of mathematics is it's cold and sterile, and there's usually a right answer. What we deal with is humans. Humans are insanely jagged. They flip from logic to emotion to logic to emotion, and there's going to be way more nuance in like, that's why marketing degree is an arts.” - RabahAssociated Links:Learn more about Rabah Rahil and FERMÀTAncient Aliens episode about Srinivasa RamanujanHave you checked out our YouTube channel yet?Subscribe to Insiders and The Senses to read more about what we are witnessing in the commerce worldListen to our other episodes of Future CommerceHave any questions or comments about the show? Let us know on futurecommerce.com, or reach out to us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. We love hearing from our listeners!

Srinivasa Ramanujan was a mathematical genius who left an indelible mark on the world of mathematics. Born in India in 1887, he had an innate ability for numbers and discovered his own theorems without any formal training. Ramanujan's work, often compared to that of great mathematicians, provided insights into number theory, infinite series, and mathematical analysis. Despite facing initial challenges and skepticism, his brilliance was eventually recognized, leading to collaborations with renowned mathematicians like G.H. Hardy. Ramanujan's legacy lives on, showcasing the extraordinary potential of untapped mathematical talent. #brightside Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... Trinity College: Stanley Howe / Whewell's Court, Trinity College, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi... Chennai Central: jamal haider, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi... The Man Who Knew Infinity / Warner Bros. Pictures and co-producers Animation is created by Bright Side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music from TheSoul Sound: https://thesoul-sound.com/ Check our Bright Side podcast on Spotify and leave a positive review! https://open.spotify.com/show/0hUkPxD... Subscribe to Bright Side: https://goo.gl/rQTJZz ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Social Media: Facebook:   / brightside   Instagram:   / brightside.official   TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@brightside.of... Stock materials (photos, footages and other): https://www.depositphotos.com https://www.shutterstock.com https://www.eastnews.ru ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For more videos and articles visit: http://www.brightside.me Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey there Listeners!  It's time for our Society of Actuaries Research Insights Podcast Classic edition.  Tomorrow is Mathematics Day, which originated in India and was centered around one man, Srinivasa Ramanujan, who was born on December 22, 1887, and who made some important contributions to the discipline.  In honor of Mathematics Day, we are presenting our Data Analysis Contest podcast originally published in 2019.  Hear the first-place winner, Tommy Steed, talk about his experience. We hope you enjoy this Research Insights Podcast Classic!  Landing Page:  https://www.soa.org/research/opportunities/2018-data-analysis-contest/

Ak by sa niekto vrátil v čase a snažil by sa nás matematikou presvedčiť, odkiaľ pochádza, pôsobil by ako indický matematik Srinivasa Ramanujan. Ako dokázal vidieť zložité rovnice? S akými prekážkami zápasil? A kto boli jeho najlepší priatelia? O tom všetkom diskutujú Jozef a Samuel. Podcast vzniká v spolupráci so SME.  Podcastové hrnčeky a ponožky nájdete na stránke https://vedator.space/vedastore/ Vedátora môžete podporiť cez stránku Patreon https://www.patreon.com/Vedator_sk Všetko ostatné nájdete tu https://linktr.ee/vedatorsk Vedátorský newsletter http://eepurl.com/gIm1y5      

To achieve growth in life, it's crucial to recognize that adhering to the same old routines and approaches won't yield the transformative progress we desire. Whether it's striving for groundbreaking discoveries or aiming to attain the pinnacle of success, following the crowd won't set us apart. Consider scientists as a prime example. While the world is teeming with brilliant minds, it's those who dare to break free from convention and embrace unorthodox thinking who truly leave their mark. Take, for instance, John Gurdon, the British developmental biologist whose early academic struggles didn't deter him from making groundbreaking contributions to cloning and stem cell research, ultimately establishing himself as a luminary in the field of biology. Similarly, Srinivasa Ramanujan, the self-taught Indian mathematician, astounded the world with his remarkable contributions to number theory, mathematical analysis, and continued fractions. Even iconic figures like Einstein and Newton transcended the confines of traditional learning, demonstrating that progress demands a departure from one-dimensional, textbook approaches. To achieve personal growth and ascend to new levels in our lives, we must acknowledge that we, too, must evolve. Today, we're going to have a multidimensional, expansive conversation with two people I adore and love, Monique Garsaud and Donna DiDomenico, to discuss the concept of "Next Level Living." We'll explore how becoming more aware of ourselves and our surroundings can lead to a more fulfilling life. We will cover personal stories, varied careers, and the paths they've taken to break free from societal expectations. Join us in this deep conversation about personal growth, finding yourself, and creating a more meaningful life. Feel free to connect with Donna DiDomenico at donna@bthedifference.global and for a deeper dive into Monique Garsaud's world, explore her website at https://www.moniquegarsaud.com/. They're just a click away from sharing their incredible insights and experiences with you! I help important people turn their dull lives into exciting experiences that touch their hearts and souls. If you are ready to get out-of-the-box of your life, engage intuitive tools, and elevate your life and business, then Next Level Living is for you. You are ready to bring your mission to the world. Whether you are speaking on stages, creating your signature product, healing the masses, writing a book, producing your film, or all of the above, book a call with me. You have nothing to lose but time, and you already watch that pass you by daily. Next Level Living— go to  www.marilynalauria.com/next. I've got something special for you—a FREE training video that introduces you to your Higher Self, the one already living the life of your dreams!  Together, we'll: Expand Consciousness: Embrace new awareness and hidden potentials. Connect to Soul: Ignite purpose by uncovering your true essence. Transcend Ego: Release limiting beliefs holding you back.  Anchor Your Purpose: Unveil your unique life mission. Trust Intuition: Embrace inner guidance and self-trust. Decisions with Wisdom: Make life-changing choices guided by your Higher Self. Don't wait. Your journey begins now. Grab your FREE training now: https://www.marilynalauria.com/higherself/   In this episode you'll learn about: Thinking beyond one-dimensional approach What is power? The role of personal responsibility in transformation 16:38 - for the person that's lost and no idea what to do next 24:16 - living a normal life with your gifts 29:24 - seeing things as expansive beyond the 3D 39:14 - growing your gifts beyond belief systems 48:29 - being your own instrument 1:07:15 - final thoughts and questions to get you thinking   Related Episodes: Eps 144 – Monique Garsaud – Endless Expansion Eps 128 – How to Step Into and Own Your Greatness Eps 112 – Tapping Your Way to Alignment with Dana Middleton   Don't forget new episodes come out every Thursday! Follow and rate the podcast on Apple Podcast. Help us spread the word by sharing this episode with a friend.   If you have questions, email info@MarilynAlauria.com. Meet your own personal Guide at  https://marilynalauria.com/guide. _______________________________ Follow me on social: Facebook  Instagram LinkedIn

Ogi Ogas is a Mathematical Neuroscientist and Author. He attained his PhD in Computational Neuroscience at Boston University. He was a United States Department of Homeland Security Fellow during his graduate studies, and is the director of the Dark Horse Project in the Laboratory for the Science of Individuality at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. His the author of several books including "A Billion Wicked Thoughts" (2011), "This is What It Sounds Like: What the Music You Love Says About You" (2022), "Journey of the Mind: How Thinking Emerged from Chaos" (2022) among several others. His work focuses on a unified account of the mind that explains how consciousness, language, the Self, and civilization emerged incrementally out of chaos. A Grand Unified Theory of Consciousness. EPISODE LINKS: - Ogi's Website: https://www.ogiogas.com/ - Ogi's Books: https://www.amazon.com/Books-Ogi-Ogas/s?rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3AOgi+Ogas - Journey of the Mind: https://thejourneyofthemind.com/ CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu - Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Introduction 0:38 - The Dynamic Mind ("Mistaking Things for Activity") 4:36 - Stephen Grossberg's Mathematical Model of the Mind ("The Greatest Living Scientist") 10:58 - How to know when a Theory is on the right track (Integrations & Unifying) 14:03 - An Unexpected Twist (Communicating with Intelligent Extraterrestrials?!) 16:04 - "Cosmic Cycle"/"Ladder of Purpose" (Mathematics shared with Ogi by "Intex") 19:57 - The Attention Dilemma & Resonance Theory 24:22 - "Super Minds" 27:15 - "Hyper Minds" & "Axiomized Minds" 30:11 - There is a Cosmic Purpose: Love 33:37 - Ogi's first ET experience & how it guided him towards a Mathematical Theory of Consciousness 38:16 - Skepticism vs Curiosity 41:46 - Predictions the Dynamic/Resonance Theory can make 46:20 - The "Failsafe Supreme" & Ogi's description of his ET experiences 56:48 - Why Ogi is opening up about this now 1:00:36 - Similarities with Srinivasa Ramanujan ("The Man Who Knew Infinity") 1:03:22 - How Ogi now perceives Psychosis (Suggestible States of Consciousness) from an Autistic perspective 1:12:18 - Countries are Conscious (Why America is Conscious & Russia is not) 1:19:20 - Consciousness is not the pinnacle (evolutionary arch) 1:23:32 - Why we should fear Analog Artificial Intelligence 1:30:43 - Ogi's view on Philosophy of Mind & Different Theories of Consciousness 1:40:32 - Against Essentialism and for Holism 1:46:47 - Evolutionary Psychology is a dead-end 1:53:41 - Facilitating Hyper Minds with respect & diversity 1:57:00 - Where are these "Intex"/"Axiomized Minds"? 2:01:57 - Important takeaways: The Universe is Designed by Minds, for Love 2:14:27 - Ogi's Forthcoming Book: "Large Gods for Small Children" 2:16:38 - Conclusion

Mathématicien de génie, Srinivasa Ramanujan a subjugué ses pairs – au cours de sa très brève existence. Il faut dire que l'Indien – principalement autodidacte – a produit une quantité de théorèmes dont la fulgurance logique et l'originalité prenaient de cours tous ses confrères. Dans sa vie intime, par contre, l'homme se montrait d'une rigueur beaucoup moins bienfaitrice... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit GaiaPodcast.com for more information.Throughout history various figures have claimed to be able to access a quantum field of information, such as Nikola Tesla, Rudolf Steiner, Walter Russell, Edgar Cayce, and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Esoteric researcher Jonny Enoch provides evidence for consciousness working as a quantum field, not a phenomenon limited to within the brain. Host: Jonny Enoch 

Hoy hablamos sobre lo que hay debajo de la piel de las matemáticas. ¿Son los matemáticos pensadores racionales o son más bien bohemios soñadores? Trataré de convenceros de que las mates se parecen bastante a un arte, y que un corazón de artista viene muy bien para hacer matemáticas. Lo hacemos con la excusa del septuagésimo quinto aniversario del fallecimiento de Godfrey Harold Hardy, un matemático británico poco recordado hoy en día, pero que tuvo el honor de descubrir no sólo verdades matemáticas, sino también a un genio de las matemáticas: Hardy fue el mentor de Srinivasa Ramanujan, uno de los matemáticos más talentosos de la historia. Tenía tanto talento... que necesitaba frenarse para que los demás pudieran entenderle. Os contamos la historia de Hardy y Ramanujan, y recuperamos algunos pasajes de la "Apología de un matemático", el libro que escribió Hardy ya en sus años finales, y en el que reflexiona sobre qué son las matemáticas, qué aportan a la sociedad y por qué hacemos matemáticas. Un clásico que ha envejecido... con dificultad, porque la sociedad que Hardy describe en él quizá no se parece mucho a la nuestra, pero que en cualquier caso sigue valiendo la pena. En este recorrido nos acompaña Santi García Cremades, matemático, divulgador en Onda Cero, en Radio Nacional de España y en La Sexta y profesor en la Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche. Santi es el responsable de los retos matemáticos todos los lunes y jueves en Más de Uno. Este programa se emitió originalmente el 8 de diciembre de 2022. Podéis escuchar el resto de audios de Más de Uno en la app de Onda Cero y en su web, ondacero.es

Con Alberto Aparici charlamos sobre las matemáticas como arte a propósito de G.H Hardy, un matemático británico que se especializó en teoría de números y que reflexionó sobre qué son las matemáticas, cuál es su papel en la sociedad y por qué hacemos matemáticas. ¿Son las matemáticas un arte disfrazado de ciencia? Hablamos de esto con nuestro matemático, Santi García Cremades, y conocemos la historia cuando el matemático G.H. Hardy descubrió a Srinivasa Ramanujan, el Mozart de las matemáticas.

Con Alberto Aparici charlamos sobre las matemáticas como arte a propósito de G.H Hardy, un matemático británico que se especializó en teoría de números y que reflexionó sobre qué son las matemáticas, cuál es su papel en la sociedad y por qué hacemos matemáticas. ¿Son las matemáticas un arte disfrazado de ciencia? Hablamos de esto con nuestro matemático, Santi García Cremades, y conocemos la historia cuando el matemático G.H. Hardy descubrió a Srinivasa Ramanujan, el Mozart de las matemáticas.

Con Alberto Aparici charlamos sobre las matemáticas como arte a propósito de G.H Hardy, un matemático británico que se especializó en teoría de números y que reflexionó sobre qué son las matemáticas, cuál es su papel en la sociedad y por qué hacemos matemáticas. ¿Son las matemáticas un arte disfrazado de ciencia? Hablamos de esto con nuestro matemático, Santi García Cremades, y conocemos la historia cuando el matemático G.H. Hardy descubrió a Srinivasa Ramanujan, el Mozart de las matemáticas.

Autodidacte, intuitif, génial. Voici les adjectifs qui collent généralement à la peau de Srinivasa Ramanujan, l'un des plus grands mathématiciens de tous les temps. Si sa vie fut courte, elle n'en fut pas moins prolifique. Fasciné par les mathématiques dès son plus jeune âge, Srinivasa se plonge inlassablement dans chaque livre sur lequel il arrive à mettre la main, se constituant un savoir éclectique auquel il combine son incroyable intuition des nombres et des formules. Au cours de sa brève carrière, il fera évoluer la théorie des nombres, s'intéressera aux fonctions elliptiques, aux fractions continues et aux séries infinies, laissant derrière lui un héritage considérable.

Autodidacte, intuitif, génial. Voici les adjectifs qui collent généralement à la peau de Srinivasa Ramanujan, l'un des plus grands mathématiciens de tous les temps. Si sa vie fut courte, elle n'en fut pas moins prolifique. Fasciné par les mathématiques dès son plus jeune âge, Srinivasa se plonge inlassablement dans chaque livre sur lequel il arrive à mettre la main, se constituant un savoir éclectique auquel il combine son incroyable intuition des nombres et des formules. Au cours de sa brève carrière, il fera évoluer la théorie des nombres, s'intéressera aux fonctions elliptiques, aux fractions continues et aux séries infinies, laissant derrière lui un héritage considérable.

Srinivasa Ramanujan, the well known Indian mathematician, had almost no formal training in pure mathematics, yet he made substantial contributions to mathematical analysis, number theory, infinite series, and continued fractions, including solutions to mathematical problems then considered unsolvable. He also loved movies with numbers in the title and would have been right at home with this weeks TOP5 content.Continuing the number theme was the RON HOWARD 2022 American biographical survival film based on the Tham Luang cave rescue. This one was tense AF, but gripping too. Featuring a great performances from Viggo Mortensen and Colin Farrell, this was a strong recommend from the Dads.Rounding off the week was some kids thing called The Brilliant World of Tom Gates. Both Dan and Reegs were impressed, but I didn't see it having forgotten that the original choice of Zog had been switched for this. So I don't really know what to say here....We love to hear from our listeners! By which I mean we tolerate it. If it hasn't been completely destroyed yet you can usually find us on twitter @dads_film, on Facebook Bad Dads Film Review, on email at baddadsjsy@gmail.com or on our website baddadsfilm.com. Until next time, we remain... Bad Dads

Visit Gaiaunexplained.com for more information. Throughout history various figures have claimed to be able to access a quantum field of information, such as Nikola Tesla, Rudolf Steiner, Walter Russell, Edgar Cayce, and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Esoteric researcher Jonny Enoch provides evidence for consciousness working as a quantum field, not a phenomenon limited to within the brain.  Host: Jonny Enoch 

Late Nights at Blockbuster We celebrate the 25th anniversary of Good Will Hunting, a movie that is on both of our Top 5 all-time movies. Naturally, we started quoting the movie to each other too early in favorite scenes instead of waiting for the Drax award. We go Kevin Costner in Robin Hood Prince of Thieves where the Boston accent goes in and out. Troy tries to hang on a little longer than Byers. We also discuss if this is Robin Williams best performance. Goofs: Byers makes us even older than we are by saying we were Will and Chuckie's age when we first saw this movie but we were closer to 17 than 20 and 22. For the record. Troy was wrong Jimmy Flynn had two other acting credits in The Cider House Rules and What's the Worst That Could Happen? The man from India that Sean and Lambeau discuss is Srinivasa Ramanujan. Intro/Outro music by friend of the podcast Seth Gilbertson. Find more music at iTunes (https://music.apple.com/us/artist/seth-gilbertson/1155231950) and YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/user/sethgilbertson/videos)

Bruce Berndt is a Mathematics professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who spent more than 40 years finding the proofs of Ramanujan's Notebooks. According to Academic Influence, Dr. Bernt is the 5th most influential mathematician. In this conversation, we talk to Dr. Berndt to find out how Ramanujan found him and how Dr. Berndt found Ramanujan. Srinivasa Ramanujan (aka The Man Who Knew Infinity) was the greatest Indian mathematician ever to have lived. His story is a story of obsessively following his curiosity and relentlessly pursuing what he loved. Why did Dr. Berndt spend more than 40 years proving every result of the notebook? Ramanujan didn't write the proofs. He was that great and had an absurd level of mathematical intuition. Ramanujan's story is unique because he had no formal math background and never finished college. He was humbly self-taught. He did not fit in because of his greatness, so the system pushed him out. Fortunately, Ramanujan found Hardy, an English mathematician who believed in him and helped him get out of the "system" to work on his mathematics. What if Hardy never replied? Comparably, this is the story of many other Ramanujan-like people around the world who get pushed to the side because of their inability to fit in the assembly line educational system. Obsession and curiosity over well-roundedness are how geniuses are made. Ramanujan's moving story and astonishing mathematics made Dr. Berndt spend almost fifty years of his life proving every result in Ramanujan's Notebooks. And why one of the best experiences of Dr. Bernt's life was holding Ramanujan's slate, where Ramanujan spent countless hours doing mathematics. Moreover, Dr. Berndt is one of the greatest analytic number theorists, and while he recently retired, he continues to do research, and most of it is, of course, motivated by Ramanujan's work. Needless to say, Dr. Berndt truly encompasses the philosophy of every UIUC Talkshow guest, people who are sane in a way most people are crazy. We hope you can be as inspired by this conversation as we were. EPISODE LINKS: Bruce Berndt's Website: https://faculty.math.illinois.edu/~berndt/ Bruce Berndt's UIUC Website: https://math.illinois.edu/directory/profile/berndt OUTLINE: 0:00 - Introduction 0:39 - Mock Theta Functions 3:06 - Ramanujan's Big Leaps 5:08 - Ramanujan's Divinity 7:45 - Ramanujan's Early Life 14:16 - Ramanujan arrives in England 16:22 - How Berndt found Ramanujan 26:55 - Ramanujan's Home 30:24 - Ramanujan's Slate 36:04 - The Lost Notebook 48:43 - How Ramanujan found Berndt 54:48 - India's perspective of Ramanujan 56:30 - What would you ask Ramanujan? 1:02:58 - Ramanujan's obsession & pressures to be "well-rounded" 1:07:04 - We need new systems to allow people to follow their obsessions 1:10:00 - College Admissions & Ramanujan would not be accepted at UIUC 1:14:00 - Advice for young people 1:20:59 - Favorite UIUC Memories 1:28:00 - What would be the greatest mathematics discovery? 1:33:18 - Ramanujan and Complex Analysis

Dr. Ken Ono says his greatest strength is his curiosity. That curiosity has taken him to the 100 year-old manuscripts of Srinivasa Ramanujan, to the US Olympic swimming team, to astronomical queries into black holes and even to Hollywood. Tune in to hear more about those adventures and why Dr. Ono says theoretical math is an art form.

Rathinavani 90.8 Community Radio | Special Podcast on World Intellectual Property Day 2022 | Remembering William Shakespeare & Srinivasa Ramanujan | Podcast talk by RCAS English HoD Dr Kavitha

Renowned number theorist Dr. Ken Ono shares his deep connection to the life and work of Srinivasa Ramanujan. Dr. Ono served as the mathematical consultant and producer of the film "The Man Who Knew Infinity" about Ramanujan's life. This episode was co-produced with the Reynold's School of Journalism and the Hitchcock Project for Visualizing Science.

Subscribe to the podcast!  https://podfollow.com/everythingeverywhere/ In 1913, a young man from the city of Madras in British India sent a letter to one of the world's preeminent mathematicians, G.H. Hardy, in Cambridge Univerisity in England. The young man had no formal education in advanced mathematics, yet that letter would end up changing the landscape of mathematics for the rest of the 20th century.  Learn more about the legendary Srinivasa Ramanujan, one of the world's most gifted natural mathematicians, on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.  -------------------------------- Associate Producers: Peter Bennett & Thor Thomsen   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh   Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/EEDailyPodcast/ Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the 1960s, mathematician and computer scientist Gregory Chaitin published a landmark paper in the field of algorithmic information theory in the Journal of the ACM – and he was only a teenager. Since then he's explored mathematics, computer science, and even gotten a mathematical constant named after him. Robert J. Marks leads the discussion with Professor Gregory Chaitin on… Source

50 Great Mathematics of the world by Rajesh Kumar Thakur

An audio about the life of Srinivasa Ramanujan and the reason behind the National mathematics day!

In India, National Mathematics Day is celebrated every year on the 22 December, to mark the Birth Anniversary of the great mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan.His contribution to the field of mathematics us unmatched.

National Mathematics Day 2021: India celebrates National Mathematics Day on December 22 every year. The day marks the birth anniversary of famous mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan. In 2012, then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Declared the date as National Mathematics Day to honor the great...

Podcast by Srinika from Grade VA- Facts about Srinivasa Ramanujan - PMS @ Boduppal Campus

Episode: 2817 Where do creative ideas come from?  Today, let's talk about creativity.

Episode #14: Richa Solanki shares 5 facts about the great Mathematician 'Srinivasa Ramanujan'. These will help us know little life facts about Srinivasa Ramanujan and his contribution to Mathematics and his treasure book, which he left before his death.

Srinivasa Ramanujan - A great Indian mathematician. He was the one who never lost his joy at learning something new.

Buddhista AI, bolond feltaláló a haditengerészetnél, vízhekkelés, filmhekkelés, spenóthekkelés. Scully mindjárt a Marsra ér, de nem ezért hangzik rosszul az első 3 percben. Utána megjavul! Jegyzetek AI AI ó rovat AI+buddhizmus = profit? (https://qubit.hu/2021/02/02/megvilagosodik-vajon-a-mesterseges-intelligencia-ha-megtanitjuk-neki-a-buddhizmus-alapelveit) Robert Miles AI-szakértős videók (https://www.youtube.com/c/RobertMilesAI/videos), ez meg a másik Robert Miles (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC5ca6Hsb2Q) Ramanujan-AI (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00304-8), ki volt Srinivasa Ramanujan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan) Mi történik?!? Rovat Hacker próbálta megmérgezni egy floridai város ivóvizét (https://www.zdnet.com/article/hacker-modified-drinking-water-chemical-levels-in-a-us-city) A Marvel-filmek már forgatás előtt nagyjából elkészülnek (https://kottke.org/21/02/how-marvel-movies-are-made-before-theyre-actually-made) Bizarr szabadalmak az amerikai haditengerészetnél (https://www.vice.com/en/article/4adpv9/us-navy-has-patents-on-tech-it-says-will-engineer-the-fabric-of-reality), bővebben Paisról (https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31798/the-secretive-inventor-of-the-navys-bizarre-ufo-patents-finally-talks) E-mailt küld a spenót (https://www.euronews.com/living/2021/02/01/scientists-have-taught-spinach-to-send-emails-and-it-could-warn-us-about-climate-change) Útépítőanyag készülhet az eldobált arcmaszkokból (https://novosapiens.hu/2021/02/03/utepitoanyag-keszulhet-az-eldobalt-arcmaszkokbol-hogy-eltunjon-a-covid-jarvany-hulladeka/) Mindjárt odaér a nevünk a Marsra (https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/) Mi történik?!? alrovat: kütyük Gombáktól lesz jó a biotech-hegedű (https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ppp3.10097) Hátizsákba gyűjthetjük gyaloglás közben a zenergiát (https://novosapiens.hu/2021/02/07/teng-avagy-a-hatizsak-amely-osszegyujti-a-gyaloglasbol-szarmazo-energiat/) Googol-számláló (https://boingboing.net/2021/02/01/look-mum-no-computer-creates-a-googol-counter.html) Cukiságok a végére rovat Videojáték-zenék acapellában (https://kottke.org/21/02/delightful-acapella-versions-of-familiar-jingles) Vége főcímet a videókonferenciáknak is! (https://computerworld.hu/cio/megoldottak-a-videokonferenciak-legsulyosabb-problemajat-290296.html) Hírlevél: itt. (http://eepurl.com/g7Bfd1)

Mit Johannes haben wir uns heute über Wins and Fails sowohl in Bezug auf Python, wie auch alles andere, was uns so 2020/2021 beschäftigt hat / haben wird, unterhalten. Es waren aber tendenziell mehr Themen dabei, über die wir sonst nicht viel reden - und von denen wir ehrlich gesagt auch keine Ahnung haben (AKG statt AKM beispielsweise, arg). Hat beim Aufnehmen aber trotzdem Spass gemacht, hoffe das gilt auch für das Hören :).      Shownotes Unsere E-Mail für Fragen, Anregungen & Kommentare: hallo@python-podcast.de News aus der Szene Python 3.9.1 Release Docker für M1 Tech Preview Hotwire / Artikel von DHH / Hotwire Support für Django (Diskussion) / hey Ticketing via pretix Brand in AKM Audio Chip Fabrik Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Bezüglich Fehlinformationen über Allergien bei Impfungen etc.. Starship SN8 Test / Starship und Super Heavy Urs: Wie baut man eigentlich Raumschiffe / Wie fliegt man eigentlich Raumschiffe Wins and Fails Big O Notation / galactic algorithm Theory of Interstellar Trade Bloomfilter Potenzmengenkonstruktion P-NP-Problem / Knapsack-Problem Nichtdeterministische Turingmaschine Satz von Ladner (NPI) / Shor-Algorithmus Srinivasa Ramanujan Großer Fermatscher Satz CPython dict Implementierung Array Modul aus der Standardbibliothek / PR Arrays statt Listen scikit-learn Picks Modul aus der Standardbibliothek: struct dis - Disassembler for Python bytecode Pydantic Thoughts on the Future of Python Öffentliches Tag auf konektom

Srinivasa Ramanujan, one of the greatest mathematicians of the modern era. A genius, and a true maverick.

Short explanation about the mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan's famous episode, taxi number 1729.

In 1913, a young man from the city of Madras in British India sent a letter to one of the world’s preeminent mathematicians, G.H. Hardy, in Cambridge Univerisity in England.  The young man had no formal education in advanced mathematics, yet that letter would end up changing the landscape of mathematics for the rest of the 20th century.  Learn more about the legendary Srinivasa Ramanujan, one of the world’s most gifted natural mathematicians, on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.

-Mente Matemática- En 1992, Karen Wynn realizó una serie de experimentos con bebés de cinco meses descubriendo que su mente podía procesar pensamientos matemáticos básicos. El joven indio Srinivasa Ramanujan tenía la capacidad de resolver grandes problemas matemáticos de manera autodidacta, sin estudios previos. Sus logros inspiraron nuevos caminos para esta ciencia. Siempre afirmó que sus conocimientos les eran proporcionados por ciertas entidades. Miguel Ángel Ruiz nos habla de ello. -Armas Legendarias- Desde la espada de Carlomagno al misterioso anillo del Rey Salomón, son muchos los objetos temibles y mágicos que, dicen, han llevado a la victoria a sus poseedores. Armas forjadas por dioses, ángeles o demonios entregadas a ciertos personajes de la historia y que luego desaparecieron esperando a que, algún día, alguien las encuentre de nuevo. -La Flecha de Lanzarote- Capaz de verse desde el aire, la flecha de Lanzarote es uno de esos geoglifos que aún no han sido explicados. El enigma de su realización aún perdura. Nos lo trae Jose Manuel García Bautista

-Mente Matemática- En 1992, Karen Wynn realizó una serie de experimentos con bebés de cinco meses descubriendo que su mente podía procesar pensamientos matemáticos básicos. El joven indio Srinivasa Ramanujan tenía la capacidad de resolver grandes problemas matemáticos de manera autodidacta, sin estudios previos. Sus logros inspiraron nuevos caminos para esta ciencia. Siempre afirmó que sus conocimientos les eran proporcionados por ciertas entidades. Miguel Ángel Ruiz nos habla de ello. -Armas Legendarias- Desde la espada de Carlomagno al misterioso anillo del Rey Salomón, son muchos los objetos temibles y mágicos que, dicen, han llevado a la victoria a sus poseedores. Armas forjadas por dioses, ángeles o demonios entregadas a ciertos personajes de la historia y que luego desaparecieron esperando a que, algún día, alguien las encuentre de nuevo. -La Flecha de Lanzarote- Capaz de verse desde el aire, la flecha de Lanzarote es uno de esos geoglifos que aún no han sido explicados. El enigma de su realización aún perdura. Nos lo trae Jose Manuel García Bautista

By Siree Sandur

Pada episode ini kami membahas film The Man Who Knew Infinity yang menceritakan tentang seorang matematikawan asal India yang brilian dan memiliki sense of number yang sangat kuat, Srinivasa Ramanujan.

Bogus and Brut explore the therapeutic freedoms of cars and bathrooms. An important precursor to a deep dive on inspiration. How do you get inspired with every breath? What do Doctors have to say about that? Srinivasa Ramanujan, Sachin Tendulkar and the 1983 world cup victory. The true borders of China, and most importantly, how all of these things can be used to explain the game of Football. Movies we discuss: The Mouse that Roared and Rashomon.

Srinivasa Ramanujan was one of India's greatest mathematical geniuses. He made substantial contributions to the analytical theory of numbers and worked on elliptic functions, continued fractions, and infinite series

Para que multiplicar con los dedos funcione de manera exitosa, primero debes saber la tabla de multiplicación del 1 al 5. Multiplicar con las manos funciona con las tablas del 6, 7, 8, 9 y 10. 1729 es conocido como el número Hardy - Ramanujan, por una anécdota del matemático británico G. H. Hardy cuando visitó al matemático indio Srinivasa Ramanujan en el hospital. 1089 se usa ampliamente en trucos de magia porque se puede "producir" a partir de dos números de tres dígitos. 6174 parece un número cualquiera, salido del aire, sin ninguna credencial para la fama. Sin embargo, lleva intrigando a matemáticos y entusiastas de la teoría de los números desde 1949. 6174 se conoce como la constante de Kaprekar, la operación para obtenerlo como la operación de Kaprekar. En otras exploraciones se descubrió que el mismo fenómeno ocurre cuando en vez de empezar con números de cuatro dígitos empiezas con los de tres. El número mágico en este caso es 495. Y no, no pasa en otros casos: sólo cuando empiezas con números de tres o cuatro dígitos (al menos de 2 a 10 dígitos, que es lo que se ha comprobado).

Amigos, este día en a Libroclaroscuro en la sección de “Películas reseñas con reflexión” les reseñamos brevemente la historia de Srinivasa Ramanujan que aunque corta su vida, fue un genio que el mundo de las matemáticas vio pasar! Esperemos les guste!! #elhombrequeconociaelinfinito #ramanujan #GHHardy #matematicas #libroclaroscuro #peliculasconreflexion #reseñafilmica --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/resenapeliculacreflexion/message

Against the wishes of his mother and his religion, Srinivasa Ramanujan immigrated to the UK from India in 1914 to become one of the most prolific mathematicians to work at Cambridge University. In this episode Dr Sarah Meikeljohn tells us the story of her favourite mathematician, and also reads out every taxi cab number currently known … Continue reading 02/52 India – Srinivasa Ramanujan

It's 100 years since the self-taught mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan was elected fellow of the Royal Society. To celebrate the centenary the Royal Society organised a meeting back in October 2018 at which we met Ken Ono, mathematician and also an advisor and associate producer on the recent film about Ramanujan, "The man who knew infinity". In this podcast Ono tells us about Ramanujan and the work that got him elected to the Royal Society, and his "Spirit of Ramanujan" project which supports engineers, mathematicians and scientists who lack institutional support. You can read more in our articles https://plus.maths.org/content/spirit-ramanujan and https://plus.maths.org/content/celebrating-ramanujan

It's 100 years since the self-taught mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan was elected fellow of the Royal Society. To celebrate the centenary the Royal Society organised a meeting back in October 2018 at which we met Ken Ono, mathematician and also an advisor and associate producer on the recent film about Ramanujan, "The man who knew infinity". In this podcast Ono tells us about Ramanujan and the work that got him elected to the Royal Society, and his "Spirit of Ramanujan" project which supports engineers, mathematicians and scientists who lack institutional support. You can read more in our articles https://plus.maths.org/content/spirit-ramanujan and https://plus.maths.org/content/celebrating-ramanujan

How do you best arrange oranges in a box to make the most of the available space? It's a problem that already exercised Johannes Kepler back in the 17th century, and that wasn't fully solved until 1998. In 2016 the mathematician Maryna Viazovska made a further breakthrough in the theory of sphere packings. She explained her results at the Royal Society's celebration of the legendary mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, who was elected a fellow of the Society 100 years ago. During a coffee break she gave us a condensed description of sphere packing problems and her work. You can also read an article based on our interview with Viazovska – https://plus.maths.org/content/packing-spheres

How do you best arrange oranges in a box to make the most of the available space? It's a problem that already exercised Johannes Kepler back in the 17th century, and that wasn't fully solved until 1998. In 2016 the mathematician Maryna Viazovska made a further breakthrough in the theory of sphere packings. She explained her results at the Royal Society's celebration of the legendary mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, who was elected a fellow of the Society 100 years ago. During a coffee break she gave us a condensed description of sphere packing problems and her work. You can also read an article based on our interview with Viazovska – https://plus.maths.org/content/packing-spheres

-Corea del Norte y Corea del Sur hablan por primera vez en años. -Un gran país insular se enfrenta al clima extremo. -Las empresas revelan nueva tecnología en un show de electrónica. --Aterriza el último 747 de una aerolínea estadounidense. -Un informe declara que las aguas de nuestro planeta están perdiendo oxígeno. -El mayor empleador de EE. UU. anuncia aumentos para sus empleados. -5 predicciones del inventor Nikolas Tesla que se hicieron realidad más de 100 años después -En Viajando por el mundo: Iremos a Tianducheng, una réplica de Paris en China. -En Planeta Radar: La curiosa biblioteca con una cinta negra en el piso que está atravesada por una frontera -En Sabias qué? ¿Sabías que las zanahorias son de color naranja en honor al emblema de la Casa Real Holandesa de Orange? -En Perfiles del planeta: Srinivasa Ramanujan -Perfiles de la música: Dolores O´Riordan / The Cranberries

'The Man Who Knew Infinity' stars Dev Patel (Slumdog Millionaire, The Newsroom) as Srinivasa Ramanujan, an unparalleled genius of mathematics who earns a seat at Cambridge University during World War I, where his theories are mentored by professor G. H. Hardy, portrayed by Jeremy Irons (The Man in the Iron Mask, Batman V. Superman). The British biographical drama is based on the 1991 book by Robert Kanigel and it took writer and director Matt Brown over ten years to get his screenplay written and produced.

In this episode we watch the movie The Man Who Knew Infinity.And in this episode we learn that we shouldn't be mean to Dev Patel.You can admire Jeremy Iron's subtle performance of introversion;You can wonder if maths is like Jazz;You can even question whether Ramanujan really was as brilliant as he was claimed to be.You can do all of this... as long as you're not mean to Dev Patel.Join us for episode four of Maths at: The Movies as we delve deep into the biopic of Srinivasa Ramanujan.If you're interested in watching The Man Who Knew Infinity you can follow the Amazon link below.Further reading links:more than you would ever want to know about Ramanujan;Hardy's famous apology;puzzles based on Ramanujan's work;buy the book behind the film;Chinese multiplication;Generating -1/12 from adding the integers.Subscribe via iTunes.

Exploring the beauty of maths, we may just find that faith and proof are not mutually exclusive. --- "An equation for me has no meaning unless it expresses a thought of God." - Srinivasa Ramanujan. Ramanujan was a self-taught mathematical genius from India, who moved to Cambridge University in 1914 to work with the eminent mathematician, G. H. Hardy. His story, as told in the movie The Man Who Knew Infinity, is not only one of a brilliant mind capable of remarkable work, but of an unlikely friendship between a devout Hindu, and an atheist who was a stickler for proofs. "Your theorem is wrong," Hardy tells Ramanujan in the movie, "this is why we cannot publish anymore until you finally trust me on this business of proofs." Once described as "the most romantic figure in recent mathematical history", Ramanujan's life also speaks to the idea of finding beauty in maths - and this is what we explore in this episode of Life & Faith. You'll hear from a leading Australian mathematician about her response to the film, and her sense of the relationship between divine reality and mathematical practice. Then, Oxford mathematics professor John Lennox shares his thoughts about the beauty of the world of numbers and patterns. We wrap up the episode with a poem written and read by former Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams - you won't want to miss it. "Why are numbers beautiful? It's like asking why is Beethoven's Ninth Symphony beautiful. If you don't see why, someone can't tell you. I know numbers are beautiful. If they aren't beautiful, nothing is." - Paul Erdős --- This episode was first broadcast on 30 June 2016.

País Estados Unidos Director Matt Brown Guion Matt Brown, Robert Kanigel (Novela: Robert Kanigel) Fotografía Larry Smith Reparto Dev Patel, Jeremy Irons, Toby Jones, Stephen Fry, Jeremy Northam, Kevin McNally, Enzo Cilenti, Shazad Latif, Padraic Delaney, Nicholas Agnew, Devika Bhise, Alan Bentley Sinopsis Narra la historia de Srinivasa Ramanujan, un matemático indio que hizo importantes contribuciones al mundo de las matemáticas como la teoría de los números, las series y las fracciones continuas. Con su arduo trabajo, Srinivasa consiguió entrar en la Universidad de Cambridge durante la Primera Guerra Mundial, donde continuó trabajando en sus teorías con la ayuda del profesor británico G. H. Hardy, a pesar de todos los impedimentos que su origen indio suponían para los estándares sociales de aquella época.

SRINIVASA RAMANUJAN raccontato da Daniele Scaglione

In episode #313 of Science Goes to the Movies, author and cosmologist Janna Levin joins the show to talk about mathematics in movies like The Man Who Knew Infinity—about the life and work of famous mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan

In 1913, English mathematician G.H. Hardy received a package from an unknown accounting clerk in India, with nine pages of mathematical results that he found "scarcely possible to believe." In this week's episode of the Futility Closet podcast, we'll follow the unlikely friendship that sprang up between Hardy and Srinivasa Ramanujan, whom Hardy called "the most romantic figure in the recent history of mathematics." We'll also probe Carson McCullers' heart and puzzle over a well-proportioned amputee. Intro: W.H. Hill's signature was unchanged when inverted. Room 308 of West Java's Samudra Beach Hotel is reserved for the Indonesian goddess Nyai Loro Kidul. Sources for our feature on Srinivasa Ramanujan: Robert Kanigel, The Man Who Knew Infinity, 1991. K. Srinivasa Rao, Srinivasa Ramanujan: A Mathematical Genius, 1998. S.R. Ranganathan, Ramanujan: The Man and the Mathematician, 1967. Bruce C. Berndt and Robert A. Rankin, Ramanujan: Letters and Commentary, 1991. G.H. Hardy, "The Indian Mathematician Ramanujan," American Mathematical Monthly 44:3 (March 1937), 137-155. Gina Kolata, "Remembering a 'Magical Genius,'" Science 236:4808 (June 19, 1987), 1519-1521. E.H. Neville, "Srinivasa Ramanujan," Nature 149:3776 (March 1942), 293. Bruce C. Berndt, "Srinivasa Ramanujan," American Scholar 58:2 (Spring 1989), 234-244. B.M. Srikantia, "Srinivasa Ramanujan," American Mathematical Monthly 35:5 (May 1928), 241-245. S.G. Gindikin, "Ramanujan the Phenomenon," Quantum 8:4 (March/April 1998), 4-9. "Srinivasa Ramanujan" in Timothy Gowers, June Barrow-Green, and Imre Leader, eds., Princeton Companion to Mathematics, 2010. "Srinivasa Aiyangar Ramanujan," MacTutor History of Mathematics (accessed Jan. 22, 2017). In the photo above, Ramanujan is at center and Hardy is at far right. Listener mail: "Myth Debunked: Audrey Hepburn Did Not Work for the Resistance" [in Dutch], Dutch Broadcast Foundation, Nov. 17, 2016. "Audrey Hepburn's Son Remembers Her Life," Larry King Live, CNN, Dec. 24, 2003. This week's lateral thinking puzzle was contributed by listener Tyler Rousseau. You can listen using the player above, download this episode directly, or subscribe on iTunes or Google Play Music or via the RSS feed at http://feedpress.me/futilitycloset. Please consider becoming a patron of Futility Closet -- on our Patreon page you can pledge any amount per episode, and we've set up some rewards to help thank you for your support. You can also make a one-time donation on the Support Us page of the Futility Closet website. Many thanks to Doug Ross for the music in this episode. If you have any questions or comments you can reach us at podcast@futilitycloset.com. Thanks for listening!

In 1914, a self-taught Mathematics student called Ramanujan left India for Trinity College Cambridge where, alongside the celebrated English mathematician GH Hardy, he completed some extraordinary work on Pi and prime numbers. What was even more extraordinary was that he couldn't prove a lot of his work, and attributed many of his theories to a higher power. For the renowned UK choreographer Akram Khan, there is a beauty in patterns and maths, and he sees Ramanujan's genius as a clash between Eastern and Western cultures. Together with presenter Matthew Parris, he explores the mathematician's life. Guest Professor Robin Wilson, who once visited Ramanujan's home, takes them through some of the maths, and explains why you'll never look at the number 1729 in the same way again. Producer: Toby Field.

Josy Joseph, National Security Editor of The Hindu, joins us on this episode of NL Hafta to talk about the state of the nation, his book A feast of Vultures and the defamation suit that Jet Airways has filed against Joseph. He's got some great advice for journalists as well as sharp insights into how successive governments in India have mishandled insurgencies. We've also got consulting editors Anand Ranganathan and Kishalay Bhattacharjee on the panel, along with Abhinandan Sekhri, Madhu Trehan, Deepanjana Pal and Manisha Pande. From Narendra Modi's words being lazily reported, Madonna's speech about being a woman in the American music industry, to the fuss about Taimur, violence in Bengal and a discussion on the controversies surrounding the new Chief of Army Staff, listen to the news of the week being discussed and dissected. Plus, Anand tells you a little bit about the legendary mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan; the panel gives you reading and listening recommendations; and of course, there's a song. Listen up! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

How does photography work? Johnny's Leica MP that we used as a prop (Steve Huff Photo) How does a camera work? (Tech, How Stuff Works) When were cameras invented? It depends...400BC if you count the ancient Chinese 'camera obscura' (Wikipedia) The camera obscura...who needs TV? (Wikipedia) The first proper photograph apparently took 8 hours to expose, credited to Joseph Nicephore Niépce, 1820s (University of California, Santa Barbara) 130-year-old plate camera captures pictures of modern Britain (but you must stand still for 15 minutes) (Daily Mail Australia) How the human eye works: It's a 'camera-type eye' (livescience) Why do your pupils get bigger in the dark? (Wonderopolis) What is a lens? (Explain That Stuff!) Cameras, lenses & how photography works (How-To Geek) Understanding camera lenses (Cambridge in Colour) What is exposure? (Cambridge in Colour) Squinting helps you focus - it narrows the 'aperture' of your eye (Wired) What is an aperture? (Wikipedia) A dicussion about wide aperture & unfocused light rays (Photography StackExchange) Principal focal length (HyperPhysics, Georgia State University) Understanding focal length (Nikon) Depth of field: How 'deep' is the amount of stuff that's in focus (Cambridge in Colour) As this photo of Elon Musk shows, a professional portrait usually focuses on the face & blurs the background (Feedoxy) "A lens typically has a set of marked 'f-stops' that the f-number can be set to" (Wikipedia) Pic: As your f-number increases, your aperture gets smaller & less light gets in (Wikipedia) Free f-stop chart (Tech Radar) Pic: Example of a Leica camera showing the f-stops on the lens, 2.4, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11 (Leicaphilia) Super groovy pinhole glasses that claim to strengthen your eyes (HealthTap) Diagram of light rays going through a wide & narrow aperture (Photography Life) Understanding shutter speed: A beginner's guide (Photography Life) Pic: Example of a shutter speed dial on a film camera (Roger & Frances) Pic: This is what Johnny's 'curtain shutter' looks like - the bit that reveals the 35 mm film segment (photo.net) What is a camera shutter? (Wikipedia) A history of shutter types (Early Photography) What is 35 mm film? (Wikipedia) F1.0 lenses are super expensive & rare - this is what the photos look like...kinda nice hey? (Fstoppers) What is a prime lens? i.e. they don't zoom (B&H) Why are some lenses so expensive? (Photography Life) What is infinity focus? (School of Digital Photography) Who killed infinity focus? (B&H) The Man Who Knew Infinity (IMDb) The amazing mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (Wikipedia) Sally Gunnell (Wikipedia) Uluru (Wikipedia) Photographs of ocean waves captured with a long lens & slow shutter (PetaPixel) The secret to photographing hummingbirds (B&H) Slow motion footage of bullets going through stuff (DrDaveBilliards, YouTube) Femto-photography: Visualising photons in motion at a trillion frames per second (MIT) Film speed is a measure of its sensitivity to light (Wikipedia) ISO has been the standard for speed/sensitivity since 1974 (Wikipedia) How to make & use a pinhole camera (Kodak) Some thoughts on why people never smiled in old photos (Vox) How film works: Black & white vs colour (Kodak) What is slide film? (I Still Shoot Film) Some lovely slide films shot on Fuji Velvia (I Still Shoot Film) Some lovely slide films shot on Fuji Provia (I Still Shoot Film) Some lovely slide films shot on Kodak Ektachrome (I Still Shoot Film) A handy PDF guide on how to develop black & white film yourself (Ilford) How does photographic paper work? (Wikipedia) How do digital cameras work? (Tech, How Stuff Works) Digital camera sensors: Backs up Johnny's 'buckets of photons' analogy (Cambridge in Colour) Why more megapixels isn't always better (Gizmodo) Baaaaaall pit! (Kids'nShape) The 72 ppi web resolution myth (Photoshop Essentials) The iPhone 6S has a 12 megapixel camera (Apple) Introduction to medium format photography (I Still Shoot Film) Why medium format is so gorgeous (Reframe, Gizmodo) Phase One medium format digital cameras: May set you back up to $55K (CNET) Polaroid cameras (Polaroid Australia) How does a Polaroid camera work? (Tech in our everyday life) The Impossible Project: "Reinventing instant film from scratch" (IMPOSSIBLE) Guy Ritchie (bio.) Pic: Thingy that magnifies negatives so you can see what will be in your photo if you develop it (eBay) Pic: Nessie (CNN) Marked up photos show how iconic prints were edited in the darkroom (PetaPixel) Old timey flash bulbs (Camerapedia) ISO: How high can you go? Apparently up to 409,600 these days! (DIGITALPhotoPro) Common slide film seems to be around 50 or 100 ISO, but there's mention of higher numbers (120 Studio) Old timey photographic plates had very low ISO numbers: This example is 5 (Fstoppers) Daguerreotype: "The first publicly announced photographic process" (Wikipedia) Old timey photographic plates (Wikipedia) Places that still offer film processing in Melbourne (urbanlight) Cheeky review? (If we may be so bold) It'd be amazing if you gave us a short review...it'll make us easier to find in iTunes: Click here for instructions. You're the best! We owe you a free hug and/or a glass of wine from our cellar

In this episode Spark Science partners with the Pickford Film Center in Bellingham, WA to host a "Science on the Screen" event.  WWU professors Dr. Amites Sarkar and Dr. Stephanie Treneer discuss the work of the great mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan before a screening of the film about Ramanujan's life, "The Man Who Knew Infinity" starring Dev Patel and Jeremy Irons. The event was filmed and can be viewed by clicking the link below. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3nCtWsI7bA A special thanks to Lucas Holtgeerts who filmed & edited the video and also.... Pickford Film Center: http://www.pickfordfilmcenter.org/ Science on Screen: http://scienceonscreen.org/ Image Courtesy of Warner Bros. UK

Susan and Russ take on the story of self-taught Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, a pioneer who made major contributions to the field. “The Man Who Knew Infinity” is an earnest […] The post TAKE TWO: “The Man Who Knew Infinity” appeared first on KKFI.

The Man Who Knew Infinity looks at the life of Srinivasa Ramanujan, a mathematician from India who would become famous in the math world for his prodigious work in the early part of the 20th Century. Ramanujan had a gift for mathematics that was seemingly ahead of what anyone else had been dealing with at the time, claiming that the numbers and formulas just come to him out of divine origin. His work would soon draw interest in England, causing Ramanujan to leave his wife Janaki and mother behind to pursue his calling among the top minds in the field at the time, hoping to realize his dream of getting his mathematical journals published.

The last film we saw Friday was "The Man Who Knew Infinity." Dev Patel and Jeremy Irons team up to tell the story of math genius Srinivasa Ramanujan. This film was a highlight — listen to hear why!

The story of the most productive collaborations in mathematical history: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/hardy-littlewood-and-ramanujanThe collaboration between G.H. Hardy (1877-1947) and J.E. Littlewood (1885-1977) was the most productive in mathematical history. Dominating the English mathematical scene for the first half of the 20th century, they obtained results of great influence, most notably in analysis and number theory. Into their world came the brilliant and intuitive mathematician, Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887-1920), who left India to work with Hardy until his untimely death at the age of 32. The transcript and downloadable versions of the lecture are available from the Gresham College website: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/hardy-littlewood-and-ramanujanGresham College has been giving free public lectures since 1597. This tradition continues today with all of our five or so public lectures a week being made available for free download from our website. There are currently over 1,900 lectures free to access or download from the website.Website: http://www.gresham.ac.ukTwitter: http://twitter.com/GreshamCollegeFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/greshamcollegeInstagram: http://www.instagram.com/greshamcollege

Sunil Khilnani tells the story of the mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan. We are accustomed to mathematicians as enigmatic beings, but the case of Ramanujan, one of the most important mathematicians of the twentieth century, is particularly mysterious. His life seems to be have been spun from the stuff of fiction and film. It's told most often as a tale of a deeply religious, largely self-taught savant, rescued from an obscure south Indian town and brought to Cambridge by a don - where, just as his world changing potential was being unlocked, he died at the age of 32, leaving his greatest insights still secret. This idealistic narrative - cut with various quantities of exoticism and the miraculous, depending on the teller - even involves some lost notebooks, dramatically rediscovered decades later, and a cryptic but ultimately revelatory deathbed letter. In most re-tellings, the maths are merely a backdrop to the drama and tragedy. But Ramanujan's theoretical discoveries are recognized today as being at the forefront of the discipline: with implications for scientists at the cutting edge of cancer research as well as physicists trying to understand the deepest structures of the universe. Featuring Professor Ken Ono. Readings by Sagar Arya. Producer: Martin Williams.

James Grime, “resident tamed mathematician” of The Enigma Project and past guest, returns to the show to discuss the cliché of depicting scientists as tormented by their own vast intellects. Can 2 + 2 = 5?; Good Will Hunting; George Dantzig; Walter Pitt; William Sidris; Srinivasa Ramanujan; 21; card counting; savants; Fermat's last theorem; Gauss. Some links from the end of the show: the first episode of Sci Cam. The Science of Fiction podcast, though if you're reading this you may already have noticed. Tracklist Radiohead – 2 + 2 = 5 MGMT – Time to Pretend The Notwist – This Room Frustration by Dez Creates Send feedback and comments to show@scienceoffiction.co.uk.

When science-y people from the online world meet, great things tend to happen. In this episode, we interview various participants during the recent Science Online conference in London to find out why they came and what they got out of it. Also, we bring you cultural news related to the mathematicians GH Hardy and Srinivasa Ramanujan, the artist Eadweard Muybridge and a few silly references to HG Wells. We even quote the evolutionary rap of Baba Brinkman, who's currently wowing the British Science Festival. Join Jenny and Richard in London for these stories and more from the world of science in art, literature and popular culture!