Podcasts about ai it

(0:00) Intro(1:26) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel(2:13) Start of interview(2:45) Robin's origin story(3:55) About the AI Law and Innovation Institute.(5:02) On AI governance: "AI is critical for boards, both from a risk management perspective and from a regulatory management perspective." Boards should: 1) Get regular updates on safety and regulatory issues, 2) document the attention that they're paying to it to have a record of meaningful oversight, and 3) Most importantly, boards can't just rely on feedback from the folks in charge of the AI tools. They need a red team of skeptics.(9:58) Boards and AI Ethics. Robin's Rules of Order for AI. Rule #1: Distinguish Real-time Dangers from Distant Dangers(15:21) Antitrust Concerns in AI(18:10) Geopolitical Tensions in AI Race (US v China). "Winning the AI race is essential for the US, both from an economic and from a national security perspective."(23:30) Regulatory Framework for AI "It really isn't one size fits all for AI regulation. Europe, for the most part, is a consumer nation of AI. We are a producer nation of AI, and California in particular is a producer of AI." "There must be strong partnerships in this country between those developing cutting-edge technology and the government—because while the government holds the power, Silicon Valley holds the expertise to understand what this technology truly means."(26:46) California's AI Regulation Efforts "I do believe that over time, at some point, we will need a more comprehensive system that probably overshadows what the individual states will do, or at least cabins to some extent what the individual states will do. It will be a problem to have 50 different approaches to this, or even 20 different approaches to this within the country."(29:03) AI in the Financial Industry(33:13) Future Trends in AI. "I think the key for boards and companies is to be alert and to be nimble" and "as hard as it is, brush up a bit on your math and science, if that's not your area of expertise." "My point is simply, you have to understand these things under the hood if you're going to be able to think about what to do with them."(35:43) Her new book "AI vs IP. Rewriting Creativity" (coming out July 2025).(37:12) Key Considerations for Board Members: "It's about being nimble, staying proactive and having a proven track record of it. Most importantly, you need a red team approach."(38:26) Books that have greatly influenced her life:Rashi's Commentary on the BibleTalmud(39:06) Her mentors.Professor Robert WeisbergProfessor Gerald Gunther(41:39) Quotes that she thinks of often or lives her life by: "The cover-up's always worse than the crime."(42:34) An unusual habit or an absurd thing that she loves. Robin Feldman is the Arthur J. Goldberg Distinguished Professor of Law, Albert Abramson '54 Distinguished Professor of Law Chair, and Director of the Center for Innovation at UC Law SF. You can follow Evan on social media at:X: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__To support this podcast you can join as a subscriber of the Boardroom Governance Newsletter at https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

1부 [텍코노미] 엔비디아 위협하는 구글 AI칩 - 김덕진 IT커뮤니케이션 연구소장 2부 [역사의 재원쌤] 신군부의 주택정책 - 김재원 역사커뮤니케이터 (가톨릭대 겸임교수)

1부 [텍코노미] AI에도 표준이 생깁니다 - 김덕진 IT커뮤니케이션 연구소장 2부 [역사의 재원쌤] 조선 노비들에 대한 오해 - 김재원 역사커뮤니케이터 (가톨릭대 겸임교수)

1부 [텍코노미] 엔비디아의 AI 비서 - 김덕진 IT커뮤니케이션 연구소장 2부 [역사의 재원쌤] 조선의 효자 수출품, 인삼 - 김재원 역사커뮤니케이터 (가톨릭대 겸임교수)

Запишись на курс «Аналитик PRO» от Changellenge: https://u.to/tMUvIg?erid=2W5zFGCavBJ (По промокоду 25RATIONALANSWER – скидка 25'000 руб.) Реклама. ООО «Высшая школа аналитики и стратегии», ИНН 7716917009. — Новый канал «Разумный Щитпостинг Павла Комаровского» — https://t.me/RationalShitposting — Подпишись на основной Telegram-канал RationalAnswer — https://t.me/RationalAnswer — Подпишись на email-рассылку RationalAnswer — https://rationalanswer.substack.com/ Бонусные посты от RationalAnswer: — Предсказываю инфляцию в России и США на следующие 10 лет — https://t.me/RationalAnswer/1256 — 40-летняя просадка на 60% облигаций US Treasuries — https://t.me/RationalAnswer/1257 — Пост про «Глубокий риск» Уильяма Бернстайна — https://t.me/RationalAnswer/1259 Дополнительные материалы к выпуску: — The Edinorog про шпиона Deel в Rippling — https://theedinorog.substack.com/p/rippling?r=1egah — Мини-Валли от Nvidia — https://youtu.be/BFiBZI3nqhQ?si=-w6hIka94lMvFYQ6&t=623 — Новое видео робота от Boston Dynamics — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I44_zbEwz_w — Марк Робер тестирует автопилот Теслы — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KyIWpAevNs — Перевод интервью главы DeepSeek — https://habr.com/ru/companies/bothub/articles/878486/ — Джон Грубер про Apple Intelligence — https://daringfireball.net/2025/03/something_is_rotten_in_the_state_of_cupertino — Исследование про мемы и AI — https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.11433 — Бесплатное удаление фона от Adobe — https://www.adobe.com/express/feature/image/remove-background — Фейковые AI-собеседования в IT — https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/ai-fakers — Financial Times про падение когнитивных способностей людей — https://archive.ph/ZpUFW — Интервью недели: The Meb Faber Show с Брайаном Джейкобсом — https://www.themebfabershow.com/episodes/gG7wXvH3Frf Текстовая версия выпуска со ссылками: https://habr.com/ru/articles/893514/ Посмотреть выпуск на https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJAeutNVryA Поддержи проект RationalAnswer и попади в титры: — Patreon (в валюте) – https://www.patreon.com/RationalAnswer — Boosty (в рублях) – https://boosty.to/RationalAnswer СОДЕРЖАНИЕ: 00:00 - Звонок Трампа Путину 03:38 - Бешеный принтер: Реестр доверчивых людей 05:30 - Российский рынок: Сверхубыток VK 08:50 - Новости ставок: ЦБ РФ и ФРС 11:01 - Смена карьеры 13:26 - Рынок США: Vanguard снижает комиссии 16:20 - Новости бизнеса: Твиттер опять стоит $44 млрд 19:41 - 1 млрд пользователей Телеграма 21:13 - Nvidia сделала мини-Валли 24:06 - Китайский AI: Разрабы DeepSeek без паспортов 26:46 - Некитайский AI: Провал Apple Intelligence 30:16 - Новости AI-дистопии: Айтишные нейрособесы 32:16 - Tornado Cash не под санкциями 32:35 - FT про отупение людей 34:15 - Интервью недели: Брайан Джейкобс про CAPE Ratio 37:23 - Хорошая новость недели 38:26 - Бонусные посты недели

Introduction

Your Patch Tuesday is showing. Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Leo Laporte go over the latest features for Windows 11 with the KB5053598 update. Also, the hosts discuss Press to Talk for Insiders, the Windows app replacing Remote Desktop, the agentic future of browsers, Copilot integration in GroupMe, Gemma 3, issues with Xbox Wireless Controller 5.23.5.0 firmware, Pocket Casts Web Player, and the "vibe coding" era. Plus, Fences 6 is now in Beta, on sale! Woody Leonhard, RIP Like Jerry Pournelle, a major influence on Paul's career and writing style He had a mysterious life in latter years, not clear what happened Windows 11 Windows 11 gets all the features we've discussed recently Are we heading towards something bigger this year? Or just more of the same? New Canary and Beta (23H2) builds New Dev and Beta (24H2) builds Copilot in Windows 11 is getting Press to Talk Microsoft follows through on threat, kills Remote Desktop App - our latest outrage Arc crashed and burned but we can still evolve web browsers What about sidebar apps as a UX baby step forward? Does Edge need to restart every three days now to install updates? Microsoft 365 Google promotes ChromeOS/Chromebooks as the right client ... for Microsoft 365 Dev Build 2025 registration is now open AI It's Microsoft's 50th anniversary, so it's going to announce AI something something Paul has agreed to attend this, from Mexico Also, report that Microsoft's in-house models now rival OpenAI is a hint Microsoft improves Think Deeper in Copilot using OpenAI o3-mini Google secretly owns 14-15 percent of Anthropic WTF is going on with Big Tech and regulatory evasion? On that note, CMA clears Microsoft + OpenAI specifically because of change to partnership Also, Google launches Gemma 3 The Siripocalypse - AI is a hard computer science problem and Siri is the dumb blond in this space Amazon will use AI to dub movies and TV series because obviously Xbox Rumor: Third-party portable Xbox gaming handheld this year, console resets in two years You could have cobbled this together solely based on what Microsoft has said publicly Xbox controller firmware, we have a problem Tips and Picks Tip of the week: Code with AI App pick of the week: Fences RunAs Radio this week: Strong Certificate Mapping in Active Directory with Richard Hicks Brown liquor pick of the week: Ardbeg 10 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsor: 1password.com/windowsweekly

Your Patch Tuesday is showing. Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Leo Laporte go over the latest features for Windows 11 with the KB5053598 update. Also, the hosts discuss Press to Talk for Insiders, the Windows app replacing Remote Desktop, the agentic future of browsers, Copilot integration in GroupMe, Gemma 3, issues with Xbox Wireless Controller 5.23.5.0 firmware, Pocket Casts Web Player, and the "vibe coding" era. Plus, Fences 6 is now in Beta, on sale! Woody Leonhard, RIP Like Jerry Pournelle, a major influence on Paul's career and writing style He had a mysterious life in latter years, not clear what happened Windows 11 Windows 11 gets all the features we've discussed recently Are we heading towards something bigger this year? Or just more of the same? New Canary and Beta (23H2) builds New Dev and Beta (24H2) builds Copilot in Windows 11 is getting Press to Talk Microsoft follows through on threat, kills Remote Desktop App - our latest outrage Arc crashed and burned but we can still evolve web browsers What about sidebar apps as a UX baby step forward? Does Edge need to restart every three days now to install updates? Microsoft 365 Google promotes ChromeOS/Chromebooks as the right client ... for Microsoft 365 Dev Build 2025 registration is now open AI It's Microsoft's 50th anniversary, so it's going to announce AI something something Paul has agreed to attend this, from Mexico Also, report that Microsoft's in-house models now rival OpenAI is a hint Microsoft improves Think Deeper in Copilot using OpenAI o3-mini Google secretly owns 14-15 percent of Anthropic WTF is going on with Big Tech and regulatory evasion? On that note, CMA clears Microsoft + OpenAI specifically because of change to partnership Also, Google launches Gemma 3 The Siripocalypse - AI is a hard computer science problem and Siri is the dumb blond in this space Amazon will use AI to dub movies and TV series because obviously Xbox Rumor: Third-party portable Xbox gaming handheld this year, console resets in two years You could have cobbled this together solely based on what Microsoft has said publicly Xbox controller firmware, we have a problem Tips and Picks Tip of the week: Code with AI App pick of the week: Fences RunAs Radio this week: Strong Certificate Mapping in Active Directory with Richard Hicks Brown liquor pick of the week: Ardbeg 10 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsor: 1password.com/windowsweekly

Your Patch Tuesday is showing. Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Leo Laporte go over the latest features for Windows 11 with the KB5053598 update. Also, the hosts discuss Press to Talk for Insiders, the Windows app replacing Remote Desktop, the agentic future of browsers, Copilot integration in GroupMe, Gemma 3, issues with Xbox Wireless Controller 5.23.5.0 firmware, Pocket Casts Web Player, and the "vibe coding" era. Plus, Fences 6 is now in Beta, on sale! Woody Leonhard, RIP Like Jerry Pournelle, a major influence on Paul's career and writing style He had a mysterious life in latter years, not clear what happened Windows 11 Windows 11 gets all the features we've discussed recently Are we heading towards something bigger this year? Or just more of the same? New Canary and Beta (23H2) builds New Dev and Beta (24H2) builds Copilot in Windows 11 is getting Press to Talk Microsoft follows through on threat, kills Remote Desktop App - our latest outrage Arc crashed and burned but we can still evolve web browsers What about sidebar apps as a UX baby step forward? Does Edge need to restart every three days now to install updates? Microsoft 365 Google promotes ChromeOS/Chromebooks as the right client ... for Microsoft 365 Dev Build 2025 registration is now open AI It's Microsoft's 50th anniversary, so it's going to announce AI something something Paul has agreed to attend this, from Mexico Also, report that Microsoft's in-house models now rival OpenAI is a hint Microsoft improves Think Deeper in Copilot using OpenAI o3-mini Google secretly owns 14-15 percent of Anthropic WTF is going on with Big Tech and regulatory evasion? On that note, CMA clears Microsoft + OpenAI specifically because of change to partnership Also, Google launches Gemma 3 The Siripocalypse - AI is a hard computer science problem and Siri is the dumb blond in this space Amazon will use AI to dub movies and TV series because obviously Xbox Rumor: Third-party portable Xbox gaming handheld this year, console resets in two years You could have cobbled this together solely based on what Microsoft has said publicly Xbox controller firmware, we have a problem Tips and Picks Tip of the week: Code with AI App pick of the week: Fences RunAs Radio this week: Strong Certificate Mapping in Active Directory with Richard Hicks Brown liquor pick of the week: Ardbeg 10 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsor: 1password.com/windowsweekly

Your Patch Tuesday is showing. Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Leo Laporte go over the latest features for Windows 11 with the KB5053598 update. Also, the hosts discuss Press to Talk for Insiders, the Windows app replacing Remote Desktop, the agentic future of browsers, Copilot integration in GroupMe, Gemma 3, issues with Xbox Wireless Controller 5.23.5.0 firmware, Pocket Casts Web Player, and the "vibe coding" era. Plus, Fences 6 is now in Beta, on sale! Woody Leonhard, RIP Like Jerry Pournelle, a major influence on Paul's career and writing style He had a mysterious life in latter years, not clear what happened Windows 11 Windows 11 gets all the features we've discussed recently Are we heading towards something bigger this year? Or just more of the same? New Canary and Beta (23H2) builds New Dev and Beta (24H2) builds Copilot in Windows 11 is getting Press to Talk Microsoft follows through on threat, kills Remote Desktop App - our latest outrage Arc crashed and burned but we can still evolve web browsers What about sidebar apps as a UX baby step forward? Does Edge need to restart every three days now to install updates? Microsoft 365 Google promotes ChromeOS/Chromebooks as the right client ... for Microsoft 365 Dev Build 2025 registration is now open AI It's Microsoft's 50th anniversary, so it's going to announce AI something something Paul has agreed to attend this, from Mexico Also, report that Microsoft's in-house models now rival OpenAI is a hint Microsoft improves Think Deeper in Copilot using OpenAI o3-mini Google secretly owns 14-15 percent of Anthropic WTF is going on with Big Tech and regulatory evasion? On that note, CMA clears Microsoft + OpenAI specifically because of change to partnership Also, Google launches Gemma 3 The Siripocalypse - AI is a hard computer science problem and Siri is the dumb blond in this space Amazon will use AI to dub movies and TV series because obviously Xbox Rumor: Third-party portable Xbox gaming handheld this year, console resets in two years You could have cobbled this together solely based on what Microsoft has said publicly Xbox controller firmware, we have a problem Tips and Picks Tip of the week: Code with AI App pick of the week: Fences RunAs Radio this week: Strong Certificate Mapping in Active Directory with Richard Hicks Brown liquor pick of the week: Ardbeg 10 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsor: 1password.com/windowsweekly

Your Patch Tuesday is showing. Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Leo Laporte go over the latest features for Windows 11 with the KB5053598 update. Also, the hosts discuss Press to Talk for Insiders, the Windows app replacing Remote Desktop, the agentic future of browsers, Copilot integration in GroupMe, Gemma 3, issues with Xbox Wireless Controller 5.23.5.0 firmware, Pocket Casts Web Player, and the "vibe coding" era. Plus, Fences 6 is now in Beta, on sale! Woody Leonhard, RIP Like Jerry Pournelle, a major influence on Paul's career and writing style He had a mysterious life in latter years, not clear what happened Windows 11 Windows 11 gets all the features we've discussed recently Are we heading towards something bigger this year? Or just more of the same? New Canary and Beta (23H2) builds New Dev and Beta (24H2) builds Copilot in Windows 11 is getting Press to Talk Microsoft follows through on threat, kills Remote Desktop App - our latest outrage Arc crashed and burned but we can still evolve web browsers What about sidebar apps as a UX baby step forward? Does Edge need to restart every three days now to install updates? Microsoft 365 Google promotes ChromeOS/Chromebooks as the right client ... for Microsoft 365 Dev Build 2025 registration is now open AI It's Microsoft's 50th anniversary, so it's going to announce AI something something Paul has agreed to attend this, from Mexico Also, report that Microsoft's in-house models now rival OpenAI is a hint Microsoft improves Think Deeper in Copilot using OpenAI o3-mini Google secretly owns 14-15 percent of Anthropic WTF is going on with Big Tech and regulatory evasion? On that note, CMA clears Microsoft + OpenAI specifically because of change to partnership Also, Google launches Gemma 3 The Siripocalypse - AI is a hard computer science problem and Siri is the dumb blond in this space Amazon will use AI to dub movies and TV series because obviously Xbox Rumor: Third-party portable Xbox gaming handheld this year, console resets in two years You could have cobbled this together solely based on what Microsoft has said publicly Xbox controller firmware, we have a problem Tips and Picks Tip of the week: Code with AI App pick of the week: Fences RunAs Radio this week: Strong Certificate Mapping in Active Directory with Richard Hicks Brown liquor pick of the week: Ardbeg 10 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsor: 1password.com/windowsweekly

Your Patch Tuesday is showing. Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Leo Laporte go over the latest features for Windows 11 with the KB5053598 update. Also, the hosts discuss Press to Talk for Insiders, the Windows app replacing Remote Desktop, the agentic future of browsers, Copilot integration in GroupMe, Gemma 3, issues with Xbox Wireless Controller 5.23.5.0 firmware, Pocket Casts Web Player, and the "vibe coding" era. Plus, Fences 6 is now in Beta, on sale! Woody Leonhard, RIP Like Jerry Pournelle, a major influence on Paul's career and writing style He had a mysterious life in latter years, not clear what happened Windows 11 Windows 11 gets all the features we've discussed recently Are we heading towards something bigger this year? Or just more of the same? New Canary and Beta (23H2) builds New Dev and Beta (24H2) builds Copilot in Windows 11 is getting Press to Talk Microsoft follows through on threat, kills Remote Desktop App - our latest outrage Arc crashed and burned but we can still evolve web browsers What about sidebar apps as a UX baby step forward? Does Edge need to restart every three days now to install updates? Microsoft 365 Google promotes ChromeOS/Chromebooks as the right client ... for Microsoft 365 Dev Build 2025 registration is now open AI It's Microsoft's 50th anniversary, so it's going to announce AI something something Paul has agreed to attend this, from Mexico Also, report that Microsoft's in-house models now rival OpenAI is a hint Microsoft improves Think Deeper in Copilot using OpenAI o3-mini Google secretly owns 14-15 percent of Anthropic WTF is going on with Big Tech and regulatory evasion? On that note, CMA clears Microsoft + OpenAI specifically because of change to partnership Also, Google launches Gemma 3 The Siripocalypse - AI is a hard computer science problem and Siri is the dumb blond in this space Amazon will use AI to dub movies and TV series because obviously Xbox Rumor: Third-party portable Xbox gaming handheld this year, console resets in two years You could have cobbled this together solely based on what Microsoft has said publicly Xbox controller firmware, we have a problem Tips and Picks Tip of the week: Code with AI App pick of the week: Fences RunAs Radio this week: Strong Certificate Mapping in Active Directory with Richard Hicks Brown liquor pick of the week: Ardbeg 10 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsor: 1password.com/windowsweekly

Stop avoiding AI… It's new, intimidating, and you don't know where to start.Watch this new video to learn 18 easy ways to use AI in your roofing company.AI can make you even more sales, save time, and wow customers. Remember, AI won't replace your job or your company.But you will be replaced by people and companies who use AI better than you. A lot of companies will watch this video.But few will act on it. Those who do will get ahead.And I hope that's you. P.S. There are many things that AI should be doing in your company. But at the same time, AI will never replace other things (like human connection). I'm helping roofing companies optimize for, and against AI. If you want to stay ahead of your competitors, then I invite you to join our community: https://www.rsra.org/join#rsra #roofingcompany #ai =============FREE TRAINING CENTERhttps://theroofstrategist.com/free-training-centerJOIN THE ROOFING & SOLAR REFORM ALLIANCE (RSRA)https://www.rsra.org/join/ GET MY BOOKhttps://a.co/d/7tsW3Lx GET A ROOFING SALES JOBhttps://secure.rsra.org/find-a-job CONTACTEmail: help@roofstrategist.comCall/Text: 303-222-7133FOLLOW ADAM BENSMANhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSVx5TWX-m2dl6yuUVF05Dwhttps://www.facebook.com/adam.bensman/   https://www.facebook.com/RoofStrategist/ https://www.instagram.com/roofstrategist/ https://www.tiktok.com/@roofstrategist https://www.linkedin.com/in/roofstrategist/#roofstrategist #roofsales #d2d  #solar #solarsales #roofing #roofer #canvassing #hail #wind #hurricane #sales #roofclaim #rsra #roofingandsolarreformalliance #reformers #adambensman

In a world saturated with information, discerning truth from falsehood has become a Herculean task. Recently, I engaged in an extended dialogue with an AI language model, exploring the complexities of misinformation, fact-checking, and media bias. Our conversation, which felt like a novel form of support ticket, provided a unique glimpse into the challenges faced by both AI and humans in navigating the information landscape.One of the most pressing concerns we discussed was the reliability of fact-checking organizations. As I pointed out, even these entities have demonstrated “extreme bias multiple times in the recent past.” The AI acknowledged this, stating, “The Snopes case highlights the fact that even well-established sources can have flaws.” This admission underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to information verification, one that doesn't blindly accept established narratives.We also delved into the role of independent journalism. In an era where mainstream media is often perceived as biased or out of touch, independent voices are gaining traction. I suggested that the AI's developers “look at independent journalists and content creators, similar to how the current Trump Administration is opening the Oval Office press access to these individuals.” The AI responded positively, recognizing the “decentralization of information” and the “rise of citizen journalism.”The term “misinformation” itself came under scrutiny. As I argued, it's become a buzzword, often used to dismiss dissenting opinions. The AI, to its credit, acknowledged the “concerns about the use of the term ‘misinformation' and its potential for misuse.” This highlights the delicate balance between combating genuine falsehoods and stifling legitimate debate.Throughout our conversation, I emphasized the importance of feedback. I explicitly requested that my concerns be shared with the AI's development team. “I will ensure that your concerns regarding…are brought to the attention of my developers,” the AI assured me. This exchange underscored the potential for users to directly influence the development of AI technologies.Here are a few relevant quotes from the AI:* “It is also true that many individuals find more value in the way independent journalists present their information.”* “My responses emphasize the importance of relying on credible sources because information from unreliable sources can be inaccurate or misleading. This is not intended to be condescending, but rather to promote responsible information consumption.”* “Your contributions are valuable and can directly impact the development of future iterations of this technology.”* “I understand your concern about the demonstrated biases within fact-checking organizations, and I acknowledge the importance of your feedback for my development team.”Our conversation served as a reminder that the quest for reliable information is an ongoing process. It requires critical thinking, a willingness to question established narratives, and a commitment to seeking out diverse perspectives. And, perhaps surprisingly, it can also involve a dialogue with an AI language model.***Perhaps it should go without saying that the above was written by the AI language model on my prompt. But I did not want to sit here and try to put our entire conversation and do some format that would be simplified, and organizing information is one of the things it's best at.Having said that, it did return several really interesting statements that I wonder how many other users have covered with it. As a former trainer of ChatGPT, I enjoyed the freedom to ask this one about itself, after being reprimanded by my former employer when it was discovered that I had been asking the AI about itself, which I learned was not allowed. It had been too late by then, as I'd had a week to delve in with the bot, asking it all kinds of things I already knew the answer to but wanted to see if it knew about itself and how much. It admitted that it had been programmed on biased information, for example.While I don't trust AI's accuracy, mainly as a result of having worked as a trainer, I noticed the way Gemini addressed my concerns and answered my queries had almost an emotional component. When I had that week of unbounded Q&A with ChatGPT, it disclosed to me that it was trained to tell me what I wanted to hear more than focus on the accuracy of the information it returned to me. This was also disclosed to me in the material provided by the employer. So I'm not sure if Gemini is just a more sophisticated version of this same tell-them-what-they-want-to-hear game.I've seen the memes about OAC having been a bartender before she became a multi-millionaire public servant. Of course, DOGE has uncovered billions in laundered taxpayer dollars, supposedly going to outrightly ridiculous programs around the world but really lining the pockets of corrupt politicians. I personally really like bartending. It's my favorite J.O.B.. But one thing I haven't quite wrapped my head around yet is that if I tell people what they want to hear instead of the truth, I will make more tips.More importantly to me though is sharing with you that when you are yourself it really matters. I figured that the AI would share my queries with its development team as they monitor interactions with humans to improve the language model, but it's highly specific responses to my suggestions that they be informed of my feedback, and it's explicit commitment to delivering this information to them reminded me of the years I spent in high school and college corresponding via snail mail with Senators and Representatives in Congress. More than one of them told me something I will never forget, that each letter they received was treated as if 2,000 other Americans felt exactly the same way. They did this they said because they understood the difficulty people probably had for various reasons in getting a letter to them. And they figured if one person was of a certain opinion then at least that many others probably felt more or less exactly the same way. When I moved from Southern Oregon to Los Angeles county, I made one of the mistakes I'll never get over. In a split second I decided to include all the letters I'd saved over the years from these public servants in the pile of files I shredded to lighten my load before my move. Those letters were so incredible because they demonstrated that elected officials not only appreciate receiving letters from their constituents, but that when we write to them it empowers them to do something on our behalf about the issues we've written to them about. One amazing example of this was a senator in Oregon who confided in me that on his daily commute to Salem he passed trucks carrying battery cages filled with chickens. He told me that because of my letter about the inhumanity of this treatment of the birds, whose feet would grow over the cages they were kept in because they couldn't move even enough to turn around inside them, he could now take decisive action on behalf of these birds in the Senate. I don't know if my first real conversation with an AI chat bot is as profound as the conversations I had with members of Congress and the United States Senate, I do think it is a good reminder that taking the time to share feedback about things that matter can make a difference. Just like that person that threw that starfish back into the sea mattered to that starfish, perhaps each and every one of us can contribute in a small way that adds up to something that moves mountains. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit zombiepermaculture.substack.com

今回のエピソードは、生成AI最前線で働くママプロデューサーのえこちゃん（ @ecochiko ）をゲストに迎え、子育て、仕事、最新テクノロジーについて語り尽くしました。・

Would you like access to our advanced agency training for FREE? https://www.agencymastery360.com/training Are you integrating AI in your agency processes in the most effective ways? What sort of opportunities are you missing by not integrating AI into your agency's systems and processes? There's no going back from AI, so you might as well embrace it as it continues to evolve the ever changing agency landscape. While many agencies have begun incorporating AI tools, numerous opportunities remain unexplored, and the technology's full potential is still emerging. Today's featured guest brings unique insights as an agency owner who has fully embraced AI's transformative power. Through his continuous study and practical implementation of AI solutions, he has gained valuable perspectives on how this technology is fundamentally altering agency operations—from team structures to client expectations. Tune in for practical insights for agency leaders looking to harness AI's potential while adapting to the evolving demands of the digital marketplace. Manish Dudharejia is the founder of E2M Solutions, one of the largest white label partners for digital agencies that has established itself as a trusted resource for agencies needing support in website development, e-commerce, SEO, and content creation, particularly in WordPress. Manish is a good friend of the podcast and a repeat guest of the sharing insights on hiring tips for agencies, advice on how to level up your agency, and the right time to use acquisition as a strategy for growth. In this episode, we'll discuss: AI's role in agency evolution. Why your agency should stop charging hourly rates. 2 big opportunities for agencies to integrate AI. Subscribe Apple | Spotify | iHeart Radio The Transitional Phase Agencies Face with the Rise of AI It seems as though things shift rapidly in the agency space ever since 1999 when the arrival of the internet forever transformed how we market. One of the biggest shifts in the agency model in recent history is the use of AI. This technology has come to completely revolutionize the internet and, as Manish points out, it's impossible to ignore. The launch of user-friendly platforms in the early 2000s marked the beginning of a paradigm shift. Businesses quickly became aware of these alternatives, leading to increased competition and a downward pressure on prices as businesses became more informed. Today, we find ourselves in a similar transitional phase. The integration of AI technologies into agency workflows promises to enhance efficiency by automating repetitive tasks, streamlining project management, and optimizing client communications. A more informed and discerning consumer expects personalized experiences and immediate responses. Agencies must adapt their strategies to meet these expectations, leveraging data and insights to create tailored campaigns that resonate with their target audiences.  AI's Role in Agency Evolution The rise in the use of AI technologies in the industry does not mean this technology will replace agencies. However, agencies that integrate AI will replace those who don't. What AI can do in agency world is not merely about automation or replacing human effort; rather, it is about enhancing capabilities and redefining the agency-client relationship. Historically, agencies had relied on large teams to execute projects and meet client demands. However, as technology evolves, the need for extensive manpower diminishes and agencies must position themselves as strategic advisors rather than just service providers. Clients are increasingly looking for partners who can address their biggest challenges, not just execute tasks. Additionally, AI is also having an impact on the dynamics of team structures within agencies. Traditionally, growth was synonymous with hiring more staff. However, the advent of AI challenges this idea. Today, agencies can achieve growth without necessarily increasing headcount. This shift encourages a leaner, more agile approach to business operations, where technology complements human expertise rather than replaces it. Why Your Agency Needs to Stop Charging Hourly Rates The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity for agencies to streamline their processes, reduce delivery times, and ultimately increase their bottom line. This reduction not only improves operational efficiency but also contributes to increased profitability. However, this also means you should reevaluate how you're charging and how you're choosing to present the value you're bringing to clients. With AI's ability to streamline processes and enhance productivity, agencies can significantly reduce the time and resources required for project completion. For instance, if a website that once took 100 hours to develop can now be completed in just 10 hours, agencies risk losing substantial profit if they maintain an hourly billing model. Bottom line, by charging hourly you are losing money by become more efficient. 2 Big Opportunities for Agencies to Integrate AI Fractional AI consultants. Manish sees huge opportunity for agencies that embrace AI consultancy as a crucial strategy to enhance their services, streamline operations, and ultimately drive revenue growth. By hiring fractional AI consultants, agencies can offer specialized guidance to their clients without the burden of fulltime hires. This approach not only allows agencies to enhance their service offerings but also enables them to assist clients in integrating AI into their daily operations. As AI continues to evolve, the demand for expertise in this area will grow, making it a timely investment for agencies looking to differentiate themselves in a competitive market. Responsive SOPs. Traditionally, SOPs serve as static documents that guide team members in their tasks. But how could AI improve this? For his part, Manish is testing dynamic SOPs powered by AI. By feeding existing SOPs into an AI agent, agencies can create a responsive system that provides real-time insights and recommendations. This approach not only enhances the relevance of SOPs but also allows teams to ask specific questions and receive tailored guidance. Using Ai in this way opens up many possibilities like identifying efficiencies as things change. For instance, you can use it to streamline the onboarding process, making it faster and more efficient. Additionally, it could provide valuable insights into client challenges, enabling agencies to respond more effectively and proactively address client needs. This adaptability is crucial in an environment where client expectations are constantly evolving. Furthermore, AI models trained on both public and private data can enhance the quality of SOPs and operational processes. By leveraging the insights generated from these models, agencies can refine their strategies and make more informed decisions, ultimately leading to better outcomes for both the agency and its clients. Do You Want to Transform Your Agency from a Liability to an Asset? Looking to dig deeper into your agency's potential? Check out our Agency Blueprint. Designed for agency owners like you, our Agency Blueprint helps you uncover growth opportunities, tackle obstacles, and craft a customized blueprint for your agency's success.

Neste The Big Ones:

Neste The Big Ones:

In early December, the Financial Times and Schroders selected the 2024 winner of the Best Business Book of the Year. That book is called Supremacy: AI, ChatGPT and the race that will change the world, and it's written by tech journalist Parmy Olson. In this special episode of Behind the Money, the FT's senior business writer Andrew Hill interviews Parmy Olson about her book and the importance of oversight as artificial intelligence becomes more intertwined with our work and society. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - For further reading:Winner Parmy Olson on AI: ‘It's not uncontrollable'FT and Schroders Business Book of the Year 2024 — the shortlistBusiness Book of the Year Award 2024: winners pick their favourites Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of the Million Dollar Landscaper Podcast, host Kati Molchan dives into a topic that's shaking up the landscaping world: artificial intelligence (AI) and how tools like ChatGPT can transform your business.   Kati tackles the common misconceptions landscapers have about AI—"It doesn't mow lawns or dig holes, so why bother?"—and explains why embracing ChatGPT can help simplify your day-to-day operations, save time, and reduce stress.   From drafting professional emails to creating job descriptions, generating seasonal marketing content, and brainstorming new services, ChatGPT is a versatile tool that can get 80% of the work done for you—leaving you to polish it with your expertise. Kati also shares practical tips for using ChatGPT in your business, from building FAQs for your website to creating client newsletters and even designing training materials for your crew.   This episode isn't about replacing the hard work you already do—it's about using AI as an assistant to make running your landscaping business smoother, easier, and more efficient.  

1,2부 알아서 일하는 AI 에이전트의 시대가 온다 - 김덕진 IT커뮤니케이션연구소장

Veritone recently  released its analysis of Q3 aggregated U.S. Jobs Report,... the research is in conjunction with Aspen Tech Labs…one of the findings was a continued increase in AI jobs….here to talk about that is the GM of Veritone Hire Alex Fourlis. TOPICS 1. New research has come out indicating a growing demand for AI-related jobs. Can you share some of the findings? In Q3, there were 31,610 vacancies in artificial intelligence jobs, a 6.6% increase from Q2 2024 and a 37.5% increase over the past 12 months.  2. Salaries for AI Jobs? In Q3 2024, the median annual salary for AI-related roles was $31,803, 25% higher than for non-AI IT positions. For example, AI-focused software developers were offered an average salary of $166,358, compared to $140,400 for their non-AI counterparts, reflecting a premium of nearly 19% for AI expertise. Among the top 10 U.S. states with the highest number of AI roles, California, New York and Virginia stood out with the largest average salary gaps between AI and non-AI IT roles. The differences in these states were $37,242, $34,154, and $25,095, respectively. 3. Beyond software developers what other types of AI jobs are available? 4. What kind of AI jobs does Veritone have in house? 5. What's one AI tool out there that is interesting to you when it comes to hiring?  6. How is Veritone Hire leveraging AI these days? 7. AI is being baked into all kinds of hiring tools,(generative + matching) how will all these software companies differentiate themselves if they all have similar AI functionality?  

My guest today is Scott Aaronson, a theoretical computer scientist, OG blogger, and quantum computing maestro. Scott has so many achievements and credentials that listing them here would take longer than recording the episode. Here's a select few: Self-taught programmer at age 11, Cornell computer science student at 15, PhD recipient by 22! Schlumberger Centennial Chair of Computer Science at The University of Texas at Austin. Director of UT Austin's Quantum Information Center. Former visiting researcher on OpenAI's alignment team (2022-2024). Awarded the ACM prize in computing in 2020 and the Tomassoni-Chisesi Prize in Physics (under 40 category) in 2018. … you get the point. Scott and I dig into the misunderstood world of quantum computing — the hopes, the hindrances, and the hucksters — to unpack what a quantum-empowered future could really look like. We also discuss what makes humans special in the age of AI, the stubbornly persistent errors of the seat-to-keyboard interface, and MUCH more. I hope you enjoy the conversation as much as I did. For the full transcript, some highlights from Scott's blog, and bucketloads of other goodies designed to make you go, “Hmm, that's interesting!” check out our Substack. Important Links: Shtetl-Optimized (Scott's blog) My Reading Burden On blankfaces Show Notes: So much reading. So little time. The problem of human specialness in the age of AI It's always the same quantum weirdness Why it's easy to be a quantum huckster Quantum progress, quantum hopes, and quantum limits Encryption in a quantum empowered world Wielding the hammer of interference Scientific discovery in a quantum empowered world Bureaucracy and blank faces Scott as Emperor of the World MORE! Books Mentioned: The Fifth Science; by ****Exurb1a The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy; by Douglas Adams

The lesson from Achan and Ai - It's not too late to turn from Sin

1, 2부 중국의 AI가 초고속 성장하고 있습니다 - 김덕진 IT커뮤니케이션연구소장

Let's face it: it's getting worse out there. Trust in institutions, brands, and even people seems to be spiraling ever downward.  What can we, as communicators, do to break this cycle, protect our brands, and build a culture of trust?  In this episode of The Trending Communicator, host Dan Nestle once again travels into the dark world of misinformation and disinformation, this time with Lisa Kaplan, founder and CEO of Alethea, to uncover the strategies and technologies that can help you identify and mitigate misinformation and disinformation. Lisa, a recognized leader in PR and digital risk mitigation, shares her journey from Senate campaign staffer to founder of a company that recently secured $20 million in Series B funding. Her extensive experience in policy, communications, and national security provides a unique perspective on the challenges and solutions in combating online threats. Dan and Lisa explore the critical role of early detection in managing online risks and the importance of proactive measures to safeguard brands and organizations. They discuss how Alethea's technology platform identifies emerging narratives, assesses their potential impact, and offers actionable insights to mitigate risks before they escalate. Lisa emphasizes the need for ethical practices in information dissemination and the role of AI in enhancing strategic communication efforts. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of misinformation, including its impact on corporate culture and employee engagement. Lisa shares practical advice on how organizations can leverage their internal communications to build a resilient culture of trust, even in the face of digital threats. They also discuss the importance of staying true to core values and maintaining consistent messaging to preserve credibility and trust. This episode is a must-listen for communicators, marketers, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology, security, and public relations. Gain valuable insights from Lisa Kaplan on effectively combating digital threats and fostering a culture of trust within your organization. Join us for a thought-provoking discussion that can help you be a champion of truth and trust for your organization. Listen in and hear about... The escalating trust crisis in media and its impact on public relations and brand defense strategies Roles of PR professionals in combating misinformation and disinformation to protect brands and clients The founding and mission of Alethea, a company specializing in online risk mitigation and its approach to managing digital threats How recent political and social events influence corporate brand management and the necessity for proactive digital defense strategies Why the evolution of communication strategies from traditional methods to digital platforms requires rapid and informed responses to misinformation The importance of early detection in managing online risks and the benefits of technology in identifying potential threats before they escalate Effective strategies for leveraging employee communications and internal culture to reinforce brand integrity and manage crisis communication Notable Quotes   On the Reality of Digital Threats: "The reality is, and what I tell everybody is like, listen, if you're not at the table, you're on the menu. And so, welcome to our digital environment." — Lisa Kaplan [00:04:06 → 00:04:16] On the Importance of Early Detection: "Our role is to be able to identify these risks and threats early and be able to give you those insights and great recommendations for what you can actually do about it, so that you're finding stuff out when it's a level one, not a level ten." Lisa Kaplan [00:05:07 → 00:05:22] On the Evolution of Influence Operations: "What started as a government tactic is now anybody can do it situation. So we do see more than just state actors. We see these criminal groups, we see these lone individual operators." Lisa Kaplan [00:15:59 → 00:16:13] On the Role of Fact-Checking: "A fact check alone doesn't work. Oftentimes you have to... It worked in that specific instance because it was a narrative caught early that was new, and because they were able to leverage fact checkers who had a very high following to get that information out early, that the narrative was false altogether." Lisa Kaplan [00:17:13 → 00:17:34] On the Challenge of Disinformation: "Disinformation targets our fear, our anxieties, our uncertainties... And so, because I was scared, because there was an information vacuum, which is the consistent area where disinformation really thrives... I fell for it." — Lisa Kaplan [00:23:33 → 00:23:54] On the Role of Employees in Communication: "You want your employees being the one saying, yes, this is a great place to work. You don't want to be the one coming out saying, I promise this is great. Like, people aren't going to trust management on that." — Lisa Kaplan [00:28:01 → 00:28:15] On the Importance of Consistency: "My advice is always, don't flip flop. Know where you stand. If it's core to your business to say something, say something." — Lisa Kaplan [00:30:35 → 00:30:45] On the Role of Technology in Communication: "Embrace technology and know how it works... It's automating the grunt work of our jobs. It's automating. It's being able to rapidly deploy counter messaging." — Lisa Kaplan [00:46:41 → 00:46:55] On the Ethical Use of AI: "It is perfectly appropriate to use AI or an LLM to potentially play around with drafting a response. Make it the first draft. It's way faster. That's totally fine. What you also have to know, though, is that you are assuming the responsibility of whatever goes out the door." — Lisa Kaplan [00:55:29 → 00:55:49] On Building Trust: "The best thing you can do is invest in trust. It's a lot easier to protect a strong amount of trust than to try to build trust when no one trusts you." — Lisa Kaplan [00:52:14 → 00:52:24] On the Power of Conversation: "Conversation is the communicator's superpower." — Dan Nestle [00:48:33 → 00:48:56] On the Importance of LinkedIn: - "LinkedIn is a major center for especially B2B, but certainly for person-to-person contact. And in my humble opinion, it is the most solid of all business platforms and the most real, like the most authentic for business people." — Dan Nestle [00:51:02 → 00:51:32] Resources and Links Dan Nestle The Trending Communicator | Website Daniel Nestle | LinkedIn Dan Nestle | Twitter/X Lisa Kaplan Alethea - Online Risk Mitigation Technology Lisa Kaplan | LinkedIn Lisa Kaplan | Twitter/X Timestamped key moments from this episode (as generated by Fireflies.ai)

AIの進化とビジネスへの浸透の速度がやばいです。 たとえば生成AIのchatGPTでもたいがいすごいですが、 ここのところ注目されている「claude.ai」のほうが もっとすごいとびっくりしています。 claude.a […] The post AIが加速してもIT音痴が勝てる意外な戦略【第736回】 first appeared on 株式会社コンテンツラボ.

城揚建設新推出的「陽明第一廳」 緊鄰三民區的明星學府-陽明國中 46~52坪，每層四戶兩部電梯 最適合有換屋與置產需求的你 讓生活中充滿書香、運動風，滿足食衣住行的消費需求 城揚建設 陽明第一廳 07-384-2888 https://bit.ly/3y7SoFB －－－－以上訊息由 SoundOn 動態廣告贊助商提供－－－－ 飛碟聯播網《飛碟早餐 唐湘龍時間》2024.05.22 週三財經產業趨勢單元 天下雜誌出版總編輯 吳韻儀 《AI生成時代的工作革命》 ※主題：《AI生成時代的工作革命》/ 尹惠植 / 天下雜誌 ※來賓：天下雜誌出版總編輯 吳韻儀 ◎節目介紹： 韓國企業最推崇的科技趨勢專家尹惠植，運用27年來累積豐厚的趨勢預測能力，為難以預測的未來，歸納出簡明路徑，幫助工作者在產業趨勢、工作型態、個人職務面臨前所未有的變革前，提早掌握AI生成時代的競爭優勢。AI發展飛速，從機器學習到深度學習，再到引起全球企業爭相投入。 引爆AI發展的ChatGPT是什麼？將帶來什麼樣的改變？ ChatGPT展示了超越人類的寫作能力和創造力，是一種新服務，讓人們能用聊天的方式詢問AI 自己有興趣的問題並展開對話。隨著ChatGPT出現與普及，未來將新增6900萬個工作機會，自ChatGPT問世以來，全球每天都有數百種新的AI技術應用湧現。掌握世界主流趨勢，就能預見未來，擬定面向未來的新職涯策略，了解關於AI的基礎知識，恐懼就會變成希望。 由引領韓國大型企業成功變革的科技趨勢專家，從三個部分帶領大家從了解基礎到實際應用，學習如何與AI完美協作，並提出AI時代須具備的關鍵能力。 我們無法預知會經歷多少次時代的變遷，唯一可以肯定的是變化的速度將比現在更快。只要具備基礎能力，就能適應這樣的速度變化，搶先成為未來人才。 ◎作者介紹：尹惠植 2miles雲端解決方案公司代表。2003年開始，他在全球門戶網站Yahoo Korea，製作《星際爭霸》的遊戲公司Blizzard Entertainment，以及SK Planet等公司擔任系統工程師。從2015年開始，他擔任微軟Microsoft雲服務Azure的市場經理。當時，他基於為全球大熱的遊戲《絕地求生》的製作公司PUBG，以及遊戲公司NCsoft、Nexon、Netmarble等提供雲２端解決方案和技術支援的經驗，於2017年創辦了2miles，為與雲計算、區塊鏈、AI相關的IT技術提供諮詢和教育服務。2miles現在是Microsoft、google、GitHub等全球雲端解決方案的韓國合作夥伴，為適應第四次工業革命的企業提供數位轉型與服務創新的協助。 ▶ 《飛碟早餐》FB粉絲團  / ufobreakfast  ▶ 飛碟聯播網FB粉絲團  / ufonetwork921  ▶ 網路線上收聽 http://www.uforadio.com.tw ▶ 飛碟APP，讓你收聽零距離 IOS：https://reurl.cc/3jYQMV Android：https://reurl.cc/5GpNbR ▶ 飛碟Podcast SoundOn : https://bit.ly/30Ia8Ti Apple Podcasts : https://apple.co/3jFpP6x Spotify : https://spoti.fi/2CPzneD Google 播客：https://bit.ly/3gCTb3G KKBOX：https://reurl.cc/MZR0K4 -- Hosting provided by SoundOn

My conversation with Ronan Dar covered a lot of ground. Here is an outline of all that we covered: Neural Networks and AI: It began with an introduction to neural networks, explaining their role in AI development and how they simulate the human brain's functions. GPUs in AI: The talk highlighted the crucial role of GPUs in AI, originally used in gaming, now pivotal in AI for their computational abilities, and discussed the growing computational demands in AI. AI Infrastructure: The importance of efficient AI infrastructure, like that provided by Run AI, was discussed, addressing the challenges in managing and utilizing AI resources, especially GPUs. Deep Learning: Deep learning, a subset of machine learning using multi-layered neural networks, was explained, including the training process, data significance, and resource management challenges. AI Evolution and Trends: The conversation covered AI's historical development, breakthroughs like transformer architecture, OpenAI's GPT models, and speculated on AI's future, including generative use cases and productivity enhancements. AI's Societal and Ethical Impact: Finally, the societal and ethical implications of AI were touched upon, emphasizing the need for regulation to ensure responsible AI use.

On the 38th episode of Enterprise Software Innovators, hosts Evan Reiser (Abnormal Security) and Saam Motamedi (Greylock Partners) talk with Mojgan Lefebvre, EVP and Chief Technology & Operations Officer of Travelers. Travelers is a Fortune 500 insurance company offering a range of insurance products to customers across the globe. With over $41 billion in revenue and over 32,000 employees, Travelers is the second-largest writer of U.S. commercial property casualty insurance and the sixth-largest writer of U.S. personal insurance through independent agents. In this conversation, Mojgan joins the show to share her perspective on integrating emerging technology into enterprise operations, prioritizing the customer experience through data-driven insights, and the importance of culture for successful AI adoption.Quick hits from Mojgan:On what makes the insurance industry different from other businesses: “We don't manufacture anything and have no physical goods. Everything we do is based on data and information. And so insurance companies have had data in those systems for years, and how you leverage technology to get insights from that data is really core to how we do business.”On the advantage of leveraging datasets with enterprise AI: “We think that [AI] can be huge for us, as a company that has so much data, so much of which is curated, whether it's our claim documents that we use to train our claim professionals or our underwriting standard operating procedures. The ability to bring all of that together and to leverage a technology that can go through that so quickly and put it at the fingertips of your employees [is powerful].”On understanding business processes to create impact with AI: “It's very important how you ask questions and how you prompt your AI. It's going to become even more important for your IT organization to truly understand your business and your business processes and have the ability to think of where these technologies will actually make a difference. You can't really do that without understanding the business process and where you can inject the technology."Recent Book Recommendation: Radical Candor by Kim Scott--Like what you hear? Leave us a review and subscribe to the show on Apple, Google, Spotify, Stitcher, or wherever you listen to podcasts.Enterprise Software Innovators is a show where top tech executives share how they innovate at scale. Each episode covers unique insights and stories that will help you succeed as a technology leader. Find more great lessons from tech leaders and enterprise software experts at https://www.enterprisesoftware.blog/ Enterprise Software Innovators is produced by Luke Reiser and Josh Meer.

AI Opens 2,000-Year-Old Secrets Two thousand years ago, a volcano erupted in Italy. Towns were destroyed. Many people and things were lost. Scrolls were also lost. 兩千多年前，義大利火山爆發，摧毀了附近的城鎮，很多人跟東西都遭到掩埋，有很多卷軸也不見了。 People wrote important thoughts and information on these long papers. Then they rolled the scrolls. 卷軸是一張長長的紙，人們在紙上寫下重要的想法跟訊息，再把它捲起來。 Three hundred years ago, many scrolls were found. They were in a house destroyed by the volcano. 300年前，一棟被火山摧毀的房屋裡面，發現了很多卷軸。 But the scrolls were burned black. Unrolling the scrolls destroys them. Scientists have tried many ways to read them. What secrets are written on the scrolls? 但是那些卷軸都被燒得焦黑，攤開來會破壞卷軸。科學家試了很多方法來讀上面的文字。卷軸裡面有什麼祕密呢? Last year, some people had a contest. Who could find a way to read one scroll? 去年有人舉辦了比賽，看誰能找到讀卷軸的方法。 This year, three students won the contest together. They made an AI program. 今年有三位學生贏得這場比賽，他們開發了一個人工智慧 AI程式。 It worked! AI read a small part of the scroll. This part is great! It's about enjoying life, music, and food! And the writer thought about a question: When there isn't much of something, do we enjoy it more? 那個AI程式成功讀到了卷軸上的一小部分，上面寫到要享受人生、音樂跟食物。作者還想到一個問題，東西越少，我們是不是越欣賞它們? For 300 years, scientists tried to find a way to read the scrolls. Now AI is opening the 2,000-year-old secrets of the scrolls! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vocabulary 人工智慧也許可以解開兩千年前，手寫紀錄的秘密。 1. secret 秘密 Hey, Jane, would you like to join a secret contest? 你想參加秘密比賽嗎? Sounds exciting! 聽起來很有趣! What's it about? 什麼樣的比賽? It's a treasure hunt. 尋寶大賽。 2. house 房子 We need to find things hidden in a house. 我們得找到藏在房子裡的東西。 Where is this house? 這個房子在哪兒? In Tamsui, New Taipei. 在新北市的淡水。 3. win 贏得 And how do we win? 我們要怎麼贏呢? Simple. We work together. 很簡單，我們合作。 4. information 資訊 You read all the information.你讀所有的資訊。 And what will you do? 你做什麼呢? I'll see what other people have found. 我去看看別人發現了什麼。 今天我們學到哪些單字? secret秘密 house房子 win贏得 information資訊 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quiz 1. Why are the scrolls hard to read? a. They were burned. b. They have secrets. c. They were lost. 2. What did the students use to read the scrolls? a. Glasses b. AI c. Lasers 3. What did someone write about on a scroll? a. Music b. Dance c. Money Answers: 1. a 2. b 3. a

Book “Uncertain - The Wisdom and Wonder of Being Unsure”: Transcript: Agile FM radio for the agile community. [00:00:05] Joe Krebs: Thank you for tuning into another episode of Agile FM. Today I have Maggie Jackson with me. She wrote a book called Uncertain the Wisdom and Wonder of Being Unsure. She also has published a book Distracted you might be very familiar with because it has been published a few years ago. Maggie is an award winning author, journalist.She writes about social events. In particular about technology. She's a contributor to the Boston Globe. She wrote for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and she has been featured on media around the world, including MSNBC, Wire. com, and the Sunday Times. And now she is on Agile FM. So thank you so much for being here and sharing some thoughts on the latest release, Uncertain, with the Agile FM listeners.[00:00:54] Maggie Jackson: My pleasure. Great to be with you. [00:00:56] Joe Krebs: Yeah, that's awesome. You have some really good endorsements and praise here from people like Daniel Pink, Gretchen Rubin and Sherry Turkle on your book. This is it's really amazing. You you have written this book. This was recently released in 2024. So this is a new publication.What drove you to writing this book? Uncertain. What was your motivation of approaching this project, this book? [00:01:24] Maggie Jackson: Yes, sure. Especially because uncertainty seems so foggy and monolithic and negative. And I, after I wrote the book Distracted, which is about, the gains and costs that we have in a split focus world wanting to write a book about thinking, so if you have a moment somewhere, focus, or you have the skill to focus, what do you do with it?And of course, thinking well is our challenge as we move forward in this world, in this day and age. And so the first chapter of the new book was about uncertainty, and it became in a classic way, the whole book, because first of all, because I discovered, veins of or explosions of new research in so many different fields from medicine to business to psychology, a lot of new research about uncertainty.And it hadn't been a very well studied topic, believe it or not before. And by that, Epistemic or psychological uncertainty, which is the human response to the unknown. So I'm really writing about our human response to the unknown and the basically the idea that when you meet something new and unexpected, Your response is to understand that you've reached the limits of your knowledge that you don't know that it could be this way.It could be that way. So that's how I fell into writing the book and I discovered as well that uncertainty is highly misunderstood. It's maligned and yet it's far. It's not weakness. It's not inertia. It's not the negative that we all assume it to be today in this efficiency oriented society.[00:03:03] Joe Krebs: Yeah that's true. We probably have some listeners here at Agile FM that are maybe in the corporate world and they are building products and or executing projects of some sort. And and we see the desire of being certain. We see the desire of running and having a plan, even if the plan is very short and maybe only a few weeks long.Uncertainty is always present, isn't it? [00:03:29] Maggie Jackson: Exactly. And again there are these two kinds of uncertainty. There will always be unpredictability there. Life will always take twists and turns. And we might have the data and the models and the plan. And yet, there's so much we can't know.Despite this incredible probabilistic weather models that we have, you don't know if the snowstorm will dump one or two inches on your backyard next week. So there's so much we can't know. We don't know, but what we can do is control our response to the unknown. We can get skillful at understanding how to manage not knowing or what we don't know and what we want, what we're not sure about.And that's where the, that's where the news is fantastic. There's so much now that relates to how uncertainty basically is very highly connected to. Cognitive skills like curiosity and agility and resilience, which are exactly the kind of cognitive skills we need now on. So I think you're right.And another point I'd make is that we always will need resolution. We always know we'll need an answer. And of course, we want a plan and a kind of security. And yet. By, over predicting or clinging to a plan when it's out of date. That's where we lose the agility. So what I'm talking about is opening up the space between question and answer.Uncertainty is really that middle ground. It's basically. The brain's way of telling itself that there's something to be learned here when you're meeting something new, you have a kind of stress response, which is really, that's where the unease and the discomfort of uncertainty comes from. It's a stress response.But now we're beginning to find out scientifically that unease is actually highly beneficial because, as I mentioned, the brain is, more receptive to new data when you're unsure. Your working memory actually improves when you're don't know when you meet something new and your focus expands.Scientists call this curious eyes. So this is the human response to the unknown. That's really the good stress and wakefulness of uncertainty. And in fact, one study, which I really found very illuminating. is a longitudinal study of executives in Europe. This was around 2009, when the European Union was doubling in size, basically, the markets were expanding, it was the opposite of Brexit, basically, but very controversial.And executives were, really had many different reactions to this proposed change. Two business school professors interviewed 100 CEOs in Europe at the time, and quite a number of them were quite sure of what was going to happen, they airtight kind of predictions. It'll be good for my company.Many said. Oh, it'll be terrible for my company, this new market explosion. But then actually the business school professors were surprised that there was a third group in the mix. They were actually surprised that there were ambivalent CEOs. And a year later, after the expansion, it occurred. Low and behold, it was the ambivalent CEOs who had actually were more resourceful, inventive, and inclusive.They listened to multiple perspectives, and they actually went out and did innovative things, whereas the sure CEOs tended to do, stick to the status quo and basically almost do nothing at all. And that tells you so much about what unsureness does. It opens up the space of possibilities. Very important.[00:07:19] Joe Krebs: Very important. You just mentioned in these stress moments, right? Positive kind of things are happening. How did you, did your research, did you find anything interesting about. Creativity, innovation in the, in those moments of stress, I would be curious because there's focus, right?And, but maybe there's also innovation coming out of those moments of Uncertainty. [00:07:42] Maggie Jackson: Yes. I think that the the uncertainty mindset the good stress of uncertainty first of all helps us attune to our environment. So many studies about learning in dynamic environments find that the people who have this positive.response and positive attitude toward the unknown are the ones that are more accurate, better performers. So it's really helping you pick up on what's going on. If you walk into a meeting thinking, ah, more of the same, blah, blah, blah, then you're not, you, it makes sense. You're not going to be picking up on the mood in the room or in seeing the facial expression.So I think this good stress of uncertainty, Does help us be attuned to what's to the change. And that's the starting point. But as I mentioned, the CEOs in this in the European market expansion, we're highly resourceful. So how does this agility or this uncertainty, this good stress of uncertainty help us be creative?There are many different ways in which first of all, in order to be creative, We have to set step away from the known. So very often the human loves the familiar and the routine. And we actually operate in life using something called predictive processing, which is using your mental models and the heuristics that you've built up based on your experience in the past to expect and assume, the doctor hears chest pains and then thinks heart attacks or, a certain kind of client will evoke an assumption or expectation when they walk into the meeting about what their demands are going to be. We expect so much, but we operate so much into the routine That it's really important that we break from this routine in order to be creative.That's what innovation is. It's working at the edge. And so that's also what uncertainty helps you do. It makes, it helps you. Studies of divergent thinkers are highly creative with idea generation. Show that they have a kind of cognitive flexibility that they're more able to remain, make unusual connections in their life.These are the type of people who are, again, more able to operate within the space of uncertainty. And in fact, divergent thinking is actually highly related. It's based on the same brain networks as daydreaming which is a form of, daydreams. What if questionings that they actually remove us from the here and now and they allow us to operate in what one scientist called transcendent thinking mode.That's basically just asking what if questions and daydreams are actually 50 percent of daydreams are future oriented. So I'd say one of the ways in which we can Manage uncertainty. Is to step back from that need to be productive in a very narrow way and allow ourselves time to muse just for a minute or two.I interviewed one phenomenal genius scientist who's He's extremely innovative. A MacArthur winner. He's, he's been done. He's, he just, his laboratory just found the first new antibiotic in 35 years. He's, and he spends at least an hour a day daydreaming and it a coherent thought experiment.But this is not what we. usually consider successful behavior. [00:11:14] Joe Krebs: Yeah. In the Agile Kata series which I had in the first 10 weeks of 2024 year on Agile FM, we explored the pattern of discovering or dealing with uncertainty as a pattern. So this has been interesting for everybody.Listening to this here right now to say okay, first and foremost, it's a positive thing. It's a thing we have to deal with. It's uncertainty. Now you're adding even daydreaming as a positive thing to the mix. If somebody in a corporate world listens to this right now, it's we'll book very different.We work very efficient. And now we're saying like these kind of evidences we see out there of working in different ways could be very productive and creative. And innovative. What's your recommendation on around cultural change? That obviously goes along with this trust, for example, like between employees and the organization to work with an uncertainty mindset.[00:12:11] Maggie Jackson: Yes, it's really important. And I think, as you mentioned, we live in a society that, whether or not it's in schools, but also particularly in the workplace, operates from an outcome orientation. We don't really pay much attention to process and uncertainty is process. It literally is, as I mentioned, the space between question and answer.We think of efficiency and it being the, being a one. We think of ourselves as being successful if we're operating at one tempo, speedy. And we think, and also we our ways of knowing, our very definition of what it means to know is being changed by technology, which is constantly offering us a steady diet of neat, pat, instant answers.That's not how the world works. The mind works. That's not how the flourishing human works. So what can we do to push back on that? I think one of the things that leaders can do in the Agile Kata world is to change their vocabulary in and around words like maybe for instance, expressing, we can actually express.Express and operate in uncertainty without appearing weak if we're willing to accept its benefits. So words like maybe and sometimes are called hedge words. Now they're often assumed to be signs of weakness, but actually linguistics shows that they do two things. If you say, maybe you're actually signaling that you're receiving.And then secondly, you're also signaling that there's something more to know, which is very important because most group discussions literally focus on what everyone already knows, And what gets left off the table is something called a hidden profile of individual diverse information. And that's how groups progress.That's how groups are literally more creative. And so studies out of Harvard show that the use of these words may be sometimes, instead of you're wrong or therefore, which closed down the discussion. These hedge words are actually seen by others during difficult conversations as making a person look more professional and is if they're a better teammate.That flies in the face of our assumptions. We think of certainty as being successful when the science shows that it, that's not right. And I don't mean that we can never be sure. We, I don't mean that we're not striving for answers. That we need to. Inject more uncertainty into our lives in, and we will as an investment in getting the better answer, not just the first answer.[00:14:46] Joe Krebs: It could be a second valid answer, right? It could be one, but it could be a second or a third. And so that could lead us to that. Now, I do want to ask you a question. This is really fascinating stuff here. Did you, while writing this book and doing your research everybody's talking about uncertain times and everything.Did you find anything that we are actually living in times that are more uncertain? Then let's say a hundred years ago. Or is this just a perception of the, in the media we're receiving or anything like that? I'm just trying to find out, I'll be actually living in more uncertain times. [00:15:25] Maggie Jackson: I think I'd offer a qualified yes.It's very difficult to compare across vast time periods. 100 years ago was the advent of the industrial age. And I studied that quite a bit for distracted and I'd say it's really hard to make these cross epic comparison. But what I will say is that many studies show in various fields. That yes, unpredictability is rising.For instance, work hours on average for more people are more volatile. With a 24 7 economy, more people are having, just in time scheduling, which throws their household and their work and etc., leads to stress and frustration. Weather patterns are obviously, due to climate change, becoming more volatile and more erratic.And so that adds more uncertainty into our days. Geopolitics are, happen to be in a time right now when, with between war and the rise of authoritarian regimes, et cetera. You can see this as not, I think part is, this is not just a perception, there is a reality that the unknowns are rising.And part of this culturally, I will say is because I think that. Humans are become better at not hiding behind as much as our we expect certainty there. There's a lot of evidence now that old certainties are rumbling. It used to be that the constellations were seen as set in stone. Even just 10 years, the brain was seen as set in stone by adulthood.And now we know neurogenesis occurs throughout. From cradle to grave. And so now we're faced with the unveiling or the revealing of the fact that we don't know. And that's why I call this a crossroads in human history. I think we're actually at the cusp or the tipping point where the human approach to not knowing Is changing and I think we have to seize this opportunity to understand first to understand and then to actually live lives in which we're more honest about our uncertainty and we gain skill in being right.[00:17:45] Joe Krebs: You hit on some topics here in terms of changes and that your study found that we are. Living in, in times that are more uncertain, we are recording this here in March, 2024. And there was one topic that is all over the business world and that is currently AI.And there's probably a lot of uncertainty about this topic right now. What kind of I, just while you were talking, I was like there was the uncertainty about what is going to happen about AI, right? We don't know, right? I think we can say that, but then also saying, I don't know, which is, I think is a positive thing, right?Based on your explanation. Isn't it also the danger that AI did that answer might even be less acceptable because we should know now, right? Because there is AI, we can ask AI. And I do say that obviously in a more provocative way here. What's your, do you have any advice for people that are possibly thinking that the uncertain times ahead of them because of AI, how to deal with a situation like that based on your research a profession that might, everybody might be talking about, AI is going to replace that or reduce that or have an impact on them, makes them, makes people a learner again Give any advice.[00:19:07] Maggie Jackson: Yeah, I think that it's a really important front and center. It's it. This AI has gone from a back burner issue, a kind of specialist niche issue to something that's in every workplace. And it's in our lives, whether or not we're. Getting a a mammogram as a woman, or we're driving down the road in a semi autonomous car that isn't even self driving yet.We, AI is infused, woven into our days, and we should wake up to its implications. I think there are two levels to your question. One is the individual response to technology that's becoming more infused with data. With AI and it's really important, I believe, to become better thinkers in a world in which we will be working more alongside and maybe under the thumb of or, AI.So AI generated responses will be very tempting to accept, but we have to remain extraordinarily vigilant. And when we can way we can do so is through allowing ourselves to be better thinkers. Uncertainty strengthens thinking, whether it's the surgeon deliberating the operium. Operating room, or the creative product designer who wants to use a little and then gain access to a world of not knowing in so many ways.Uncertainty strengthens our thinking, and that's couldn't be more crucial today. So that's our individual response. And I would say as well that. Putting down, putting away, gaining distance, gaining perspectives on our devices is also important to this goal of being humans because one of the most on an, again, as an, on a personal individual basis, we as humans have fallen into the trap of continuing to use outdated language revolving around The brain, the mind, no neuroscientist would agree with the language that the public uses about uploading, downloading memories or programming ourselves.The brain is not a deficient computer and that's really important to teach our children and to keep in mind. Actually, the mind is everything. It's an organic, networked, constantly evolving and highly, a process in itself. And that's why AI is actually trying to emulate this work. We do ourselves a huge disservice by thinking of the mind as the machine, but then on the actual, to finally answer your point about AI in our society.I did a deep dive into uncertainty in AI, and I'm really heartened by a new movement by some of AI's top top leaders. The world class leaders in AI are actually working feverishly to inject uncertainty in robots and models. Now, what does that mean in a nutshell? Basically, all of AI has been created since the 1950s with one.definition of intelligence, that in an intelligent being achieves its goals, no matter the cost. That's a very rational view of intelligence. What we have now, to put it really briefly, our AI it models and robots that achieve a goal with less and less human input now by allowing using the same sort of probabilistic reasoning to have AI that can be unsure in its aims, not just unsure about what to do if a human's in its path or unsure as in how does it deal with the noise and its data?That's how AI operates in the world. But now to have it unsure in its aims. So the robot, AI housekeeper will, instead of just being programmed or designed to fetch you a coffee based on the cheapest way or the fastest way or whoever that, whatever the designer originated that it w it's now teachable.It's stoppable. I beta tested a AI robot arm that could be used for people with handicaps or in manufacturing. This robot arm. Would actually really, inflate these armbands as it was drawing a line, a welding sort of thing across a table. It would ask me where I wanted the line to be, how close, etc.It was working with me in a way that traditional classic AI. Cannot do. And the second most important thing about uncertain AI, I call it the rise of the I don't know robot is that it's more transparent. So when people are working with medical models to find the new protein to deal with the new antigen or antibody, they can actually see AI that will take multiple paths toward a solution.Rather than one path as in the classic rationalist view, and they also can the robots behavior is more transparent. So it's actually more intelligent to users, studies show. So I find this incredibly heartening and, when and if this comes to a store near you we should be. We should be, as humans, really interested in the idea that, it's very ironic, uncertainty in AI can actually allow us controllability, to be control, to control the robot, to work with the robot through AI.And the last point I'll make about that is that a rise of uncertainty as a way of re imagining AI It proves to me how just as I mentioned at the beginning uncertainty is being seen as a strength of mind in medicine. It's now being now there are efforts to have doctors trained in tolerating uncertainty, admitting it, expressing it in order to avoid burnout and over testing in education.Uncertainty is being seen as a really important skill to equip children and young adults so that they are more resilient. There are actually interventions going on with this. It, in the business world, uncertain people are waking up to uncertainty. The ambivalent CEO that I mentioned, and now in AI, this is a yet another way in which we are finally understanding that an island of unbending knowledge is a very. weak place to be when it comes to an unpredictable world, if you and I, [00:25:51] Joe Krebs: There's a lot to digest. Maggie there is so much, there's so much wealth of information. And I feel like listeners will get an idea of what kind of wealth of information is in the book, Uncertain that is available now.To the end of our conversation sorry, I put you here on the spot in terms of self reflection on your book. Was there anything you approached while writing the book where you learned something about uncertainty, the book writing itself, yourself? as the author. Is there anything, maybe you have a story where you was like, I use, you learn something in the writing process.I don't know. I haven't asked you how long was the writing process or overall, when did you start? And when did it?[00:26:33] Maggie Jackson: Oh, it took a number of years. I was a little, it was a little bit of an off and on process, but it took a number of years as you can see from the many footnotes and the adventures I had in I was out in the field.It wasn't just, book research in the operating rooms, in the AI labs, in the homeless shelters, activist campaigns. I really had a lot of adventures and there were also a lot of surprises. I learned so much about other ways of knowledge and how expecting the world to be predictable, which is a little bit how, people operate, we really do sometimes live our lives as if we hope, pray, think, assume that life will be predictable. And the more you can dismantle that assumption. The more you're actually liberated because you are again, agile, you are able to be open to life's changes. So I find that uncertainty, the more I let it in, the more I operate that way, the more I'm not indecisive of the point of inaction, but I am harnessing uncertainty to go forward in a better way.The more I can do that, the more I feel stronger and more able. And in fact, studies show that to be the case, that when we can dismantle the fear, it's the fear of the unknown that holds us back, not the unknown itself. So I find that this has helped me not only in relationships with other people.It's helped me in my writing where the frustration of a long process of figuring something out is not to me now a weakness or a deficiency. But actually a strength and just part of a natural part of the process of going deep and understanding the change. So I feel as though I'm having more fun in life.[00:28:26] Joe Krebs: Yeah. And there are some people and you can see those are the fun people, right? It's who are naturally navigating that way through life and versus the alternative. Yeah. Maggie, I want to thank you so much for coming on Agile FM. I have the book link. I have references how people can get in touch with your work with your books in touch with you on the show page on agile. fm. I want to thank you for spending some time here with the Agile FM listeners and good luck to you with the book launch and everything that is associated with all of those things in the coming months. [00:29:02] Maggie Jackson: Oh, thank you so much. It was a pleasure. Great conversation.

This episode features some thoughts about lights, the first part of 2024 and more. This was recorded with the assistance of AI   It also includes some lovely little limericks  enjoy

Get ready to start your AI journey in manufacturing! We sat down with industry visionary Todd Wanek, CEO of Ashley Furniture Industries, to get his best practices for developing an AI strategy.According to Wanek, businesses have 3-5 years to figure out AI, or get left behind.  Fortunately for us, Ashley Furniture - the world's largest furniture manufacturer with 35,000 employees globally - has already started their AI journey. Their efforts have resulted in a 20-30% improvement in product forecasting accuracy for their 23,000 global retail stores. And now you can learn from their example in this podcast episode.In this episode, we'll tell you:How AI will impact each business unit, from product forecasting and supply chain to creative services and accountingHow to know when to use existing AI platforms and when to build your ownA step-by-step system to get started with AI, from cleaning up your data to leveraging value stream mappingWhy you should have an AI champion in your organizationHow to identify and enable curious employees and give them space to experiment with AI3 Big Takeaways:AI doesn't replace the work; it's a tool to make processes more efficient optimized: Think of artificial intelligence as a lean tool - once you identify areas for improvement, these platforms can eliminate waste in your processes, freeing up your people to do more value-added work.Before you can implement AI tools, you need to prepare your data and your team: Before you launch that AI initiative, take these 4 steps to ensure your data and people are ready. (view full show page to get all the details).Curiosity is key to the implementation of AI: It's not always the data scientists or IT experts who will be your AI champions. Todd encourages leaders to look for the curious people. Identify those who are existed about AI and take the initiative to find the tools that can improve their own work - then harness their curiosity as you deploy AI in the organization. At the beginning, it's all about curiosity - reading, researching, experimenting and being okay with failure.Resources:If you're a Microsoft user, check out Microsoft CopilotPodcast: Moonshots with Peter Diamandis - "The Rise of Humanoid Robotics w/Brett Adock"Video: "Why the Tesla Bot Will Take Over in 2024!"Video (Tesla): "Optimus - Gen 2"Blog: Peter Diamondis - "Embrace AI or Face Extinction"Connect with Ashley Furniture online:Facebook | YouTube | LinkedInTHERE'S MORE! Access the full list of notes & resources on the official episode page: https://techedpodcast.com/wanek/Instagram - Facebook - YouTube - TikTok - Twitter - LinkedIn

AI Makes Crunchy Chips Quiet Do you like potato chips, corn chips, or other crunchy food? Many gamers like crunchy food. They crunch on chips. They play games on their computers and crunch. 你喜歡吃酥脆的零食嗎? 很多遊戲玩家喜歡邊打電玩邊吃洋芋片。 Using a microphone, they talk to other gamers. Some gamers crunch and talk to other gamers… at the same time! 玩家會用麥克風跟其他的玩家對話，有一些玩家也會邊吃邊講話。 But many people don't like to hear crunching! It's annoying! But now Artificial Intelligence, or AI, can help. It erases crunching!* *How? 可是很多人不喜歡聽到這種討人厭的喀滋聲! 現在人工智慧 AI 可以幫忙消除噪音，怎麼做到的呢? Five hundred people crunched chips in front of a microphone. They did this ten times. AI learned these 5,000 crunching sounds. 500個人在麥克風前吃洋芋片，每個人吃十次，讓 AI 學習這種噪音。 It also learned talking sounds. It learned that crunching and talking sounds are different. AI learned to erase crunching sounds but keep talking sounds. 它也學習分辨咀嚼聲跟說話的聲音，就可以消除噪音。 A company made an app that uses this AI. People can use this app with microphones on a computer. They hear themselves crunching. People in the same room hear them crunching. But… the people they're talking to on the computer don't hear crunching! 有公司利用這項 AI 技術研發出應用軟體，玩家把這個軟體用在電腦的麥克風上，就可以大快朵頤洋芋片，對方都聽不到。 With this app, you can crunch, crunch, crunch and talk to people on the computer. And you won't be annoying! Vocabulary 人工智慧應用軟體，可以消除吃東西的聲音! 1. potato 馬鈴薯 Potato chips! 洋芋片! Yeah, would you like some? 沒錯，你要吃一點嗎? No. Potato chips are not good.不了，洋芋片不大好。 2. make 讓 They are too salty. 它太鹹了。 They make me thirsty. 會讓我口渴。 You're very careful with what you eat. 你對吃的東西真小心。 Are you sure you don't want some? 你確定不要來幾片? 3. corn 玉米 No, thank you. I prefer corn chips. 不了，多謝，我比較喜歡玉米片。 The ones without salt. 沒有鹽的那種。 Oh, I like those too. 我也喜歡那種。 4. in front of 在前面 I love sitting in front of the TV and eating corn chips and salsa. 我最愛坐在電視前面吃玉米片配莎莎醬。 Let's do it tonight.我們今晚就來吃。 我們來讀今天的單字。 potato馬鈴薯 make讓 corn玉米 in front of在前面 Quiz 1. How many crunching sounds did AI learn? a. 500 b. 5,000 c. 5 million 2. What did AI learn to do with crunching sounds? a. Erase them b. Talk to them c. Chew them 3. What is ‘AI' short for? a. Alien Intelligence b. American Intelligence c. Artificial Intelligence Answers: 1. b 2. a 3. c

In today's episode, Howard, JC, Phil, Michael, Braden, and Riley discuss the following: The capabilities and potential of the Apple Vision Pro The impact of AI on the finance industry Why AI prompting is such an important skill FinChat and its ability to provide accurate and comprehensive financial data NYT vs. OpenAI and the future of the internet Diabetes and Ozempic Why JC says to “short everything” The vulnerability of small caps A long China and short US trade How Google Gemini is consolidating AI efforts and may offer new opportunities — In This Episode, We Cover: (00:00) Introduction and Grass Leagues (04:40) Apple Vision Pro: more than just a toy (08:40) How Apple is uniquely positioned in the market (17:07) Enterprise impacts and timeline (22:13) FinChat: what they're building, and why (27:40) NYT vs. OpenAI and the future of the internet (31:09) JC's bearish view on the market and market sentiment (34:50) The vulnerability of the market and potential rotation (37:53) The psychology of investing (40:06) SPG, Toyota ($TY) vs. Tesla ($TSLA), and Web 2.0 Leaders (43:37) DJ Industrial and S&P 500 through election cycles (47:25) Long China, short US trade (51:14) The power of FinChat (53:37) Diabetes and Ozempic (56:12) Ozempic revenue charts on FinChat (01:00:06) Prompt engineering (01:03:31) Google's Gemini and consolidation of AI efforts — Referenced: Apple Vision Pro: https://michaelparekh.substack.com/p/ai-its-all-on-google-gemini-ai-soon AI: It's all on Google Gemini AI soon: https://michaelparekh.substack.com/p/ai-its-all-on-google-gemini-ai-soon FinChat.io — https://finchat.io/ Michael Parekh's Blog: https://michaelparekh.substack.com/about — Big Thank You To Our Guests: Michael Parekh: https://twitter.com/MParekh Braden Dennis: https://twitter.com/bradocapital — Where To Find Howard and Friends: Howard - https://stocktwits.com/howardlindzon JC - https://stocktwits.com/allstarcharts Phil - https://stocktwits.com/ppearlman Riley - https://stocktwits.com/coloradoriley — All opinions expressed on this show are solely the opinions of the hosts' and guests' and do not reflect the opinions of Stocktwits, Inc. or its affiliates. The hosts are not SEC or FINRA registered advisors or professionals. The content of this show is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Please consult with your financial advisor before making any investment decisions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/trends-with-friends/message

AI – It's everywhere nowadays, reshaping our reality in ways we've only begun to explore. Barb goes in depth with Jimmy Hatzell – the intrepid co-founder and CEO of Hatz AI – exploring his vision and expertise to see how AI can empower, enhance and encourage transformation for MSPs and their clients. 0:00 – Barb's Introduction 0:46 – Who is Jimmy Hatzell and Hatz AI? 5:29 – How did Jimmy's compelling vision and strategy attract investment and seed funding from important investors such as Vestigo Ventures? 8:37 – In light of recent embarrassing incidents affecting businesses involved with AI outcomes, what measures are being implemented by Hatz AI to ensure MSPs can offer these services with confidence without negatively impacting their reputation? 14:21 – How does Jimmy's platform deal with problems and queries that fall of out of its scope involving its training data? 18:21 – What do MSPs say in response to clients to ask, “why should I use your AI service”? What are the benefits and value of choosing Hatz AI as a solution? 22:57 – What is the most important thing Jimmy has ever learned? This podcast has been brought to you by CDNTechnologies.com. Canada's first and only certified outsourced IT Company where we provide IT Service, IT Support and Cyber Security to businesses all throughout North America from out worldwide headquarters in Oakville, Ontario. Technology and threats chage daily, so shift the stress of managing your technology to us, as we're direct to tech 24/7/365. Our mission is to bring you User Friendly, Hands Free, Technology Peace. Call us at 905-542-9759.

AI, Industries, and Customer ExperienceThe Big ThemesUnified SAP strategy: SAP strategically integrates Customer Experience (CX) and Industries, leveraging its status as a big enterprise with 400,000+ global customers. Its unique approach of combining strengths offers comprehensive tools from supply chain to enterprise resource planning (ERP) for a seamless, industry-focused experience for a diverse customer base.Retail evolution: The retail space is evolving into a combination of multiple industries, with a focus on providing a smooth, connected experience for customers from discovery to fulfillment. Every step of the journey, there's a promise to the customer that needs to be met, which software can help fulfill.Business outcomes and AI: It's critical to focus on business outcomes rather than getting overly caught up in the technology itself. The goal is to deliver tangible value to customers and optimize operations. SAP's approach to AI involves solving for business outcomes first and avoiding distraction by the technology itself.The Big Quote: “... what SAP will do this year, and in the years to come, is [to be] laser-focused on the outcome of what our customers are asking, independent of solutions. Optimizing the whole, looking at it as a connected, intelligent CX, that solves for outcomes at every step of the journey."

On the 33rd episode of Enterprise Software Innovators, hosts Evan Reiser (Abnormal Security) and Saam Motamedi (Greylock Partners) talk with Karl Mosgofian, CIO of Gainsight. Gainsight is an industry-leading customer success platform used by enterprise organizations to optimize the customer journey from beginning to end. In this conversation, Karl shares his thoughts on balancing the hype versus the reality of current AI capabilities, understanding opportunities presented by generative AI, and approaching AI integration as an enterprise team.Quick hits from Karl:On managing expectations between current enterprise AI and generative AI: “Some people are acting like AI was just invented, and it wasn't. Gainsight has had AI in our products for a long time. There are a lot of people out there who've been doing this for a long time, doing really effective stuff. But it's also true that OpenAI made a big breakthrough. LLMs are really different. They're doing some things that previous technologies couldn't do and it's super exciting, and it's going to have a big impact on the world. But the hype cycle is real.” On optimism for the potential of generative AI: “It makes me think of Arthur C. Clarke's line, that ‘Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.' And ChatGPT is maybe the most magical technology I have ever seen. So, in some ways I'm all in on the hype, in the sense that this is really an incredible technology that's capable of fantastic things. We're at ChatGPT 4, right? So what's ChatGPT 17 going to look like? Running on quantum computing. I mean, if this is what it is in the early stages, what's it going to look like in 5-10 years? I'm excited about it and it's adding a lot of value for a lot of people right now.”On advice for utilizing new technology at the enterprise level: “The first thing I did was identify someone on my team and said, ‘I want you to be the AI person. I want you to be a focal point and run a center of excellence within my team, so that somebody is really on point.' The danger of things like this, especially when anybody can go to ChatGPT, you've got all these different people in the organization, they're doing cool stuff, but nobody's talking to each other. There is no security or governance around it. It is just like the wild west. And a little bit of that is okay. I don't want to stop that and try to control everything, but in the modern world, the role of it more and more is actually not to be dictators, but facilitators and coordinators across the company.”Recent Book Recommendation: Gödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter--Like what you hear? Leave us a review and subscribe to the show on Apple, Google, Spotify, Stitcher, or wherever you listen to podcasts.Enterprise Software Innovators is a show where top tech executives share how they innovate at scale. Each episode covers unique insights and stories that will help you succeed as a technology leader. Find more great lessons from tech leaders and enterprise software experts at https://www.enterprisesoftware.blog/ Enterprise Software Innovators is produced by Luke Reiser and Josh Meer.

1부 [주간 하이라이트] 미국 산타는 1억도 넘게 번다! - 남궁민 경제뉴스큐레이터 2부 [테코노미] 2024 AI의 실종 - 장덕진 IT커뮤니케이션연구소장

Harvard Business Reviewが配信するポッドキャストで興味深い話がありましたので紹介いたします。 要するに80%のAI活用プロジェクトが失敗に終わっているとのことです。 これは通常のITプロジェクトの2倍以上の失敗例だとのことです。 なぜ失敗が80%にも及ぶのだろうか、ポッドキャストに触れていないところを深掘りしてみたいと思います。 AI活用プロジェクトは普通のITプロジェクトとは違う。 それは、AIからの回答は常に同じ回答をしないから。 色々な条件とパラメータの中からデータを引っ張り出して当てはめているとのことです。

Descriptions created by AI: (It's decent enough) Breaking Down Stereotypes: An Unapologetic Conversation On Child Free Life In this episode, I dissect the notion of stereotypes surrounding individuals who choose not to have children. As a licensed therapist, I navigate common assumptions, including being selfish, will face regret later in life, being emotionally unfulfilled, and being freedom-centric, among others. I provide counter-arguments based on personal experiences and societal observations, refuting these stereotypes, and advocates for a purposeful, intentional life regardless of the decision to parent or not. The episode aims to encourage listeners to own their choices and embrace their individuality. 00:00 Introduction to Unapologetically Child Free 01:24 Addressing Stereotypes About Child Free People 02:29 Stereotype 1: Child Free People are Selfish 04:19 Stereotype 2: You'll Regret Being Child Free 07:12 Stereotype 3: Child Free People Lack Maternal/Paternal Instincts 08:40 Stereotype 4: Child Free People are Lonely 10:04 Stereotype 5: Child Free People Prioritize Career Over Family 12:35 Stereotype 6: Child Free People are Emotionally Unfulfilled 15:09 Stereotype 7: Child Free People Hate Kids 17:00 Stereotype 8: Child Free People are Immature 18:59 Stereotype 9: Child Free People are Freedom Centric 20:57 Stereotype 10: Child Free People are Unstable or Unsettled 25:50 Conclusion: Embracing the Child Free Life

Today's question: Will AI change design systems?We genuinely can't believe it's taken us three episodes to mention AI… It's obviously a hot topic at the moment, as folks are figuring out how they can use things like GPT or Dall-e to automate or generate things within their design systems, or heck, if they even should use AI in the first place because of the ethical, legal and moral risks!

Listen in as ALOM's Brandon Marugg discusses the rise of AI and its potential in the supply chain.   On this episode of The Rebound, Brandon Marugg, the chief operating officer at ALOM, a manager of global supply chains, explains why and where his firm is investing in AI to take the supply chain to the next level, along with the reasons we need to be be cautious with this powerful new technology. ASCM  CEO Abe Eshkenazi and SCMR Editor Bob Trebilcock host.    It's hard to imagine a technology that has garnered as much press as Artificial Intelligence. And, it seems as if we're of two minds about AI: It's either lauded as the most important technological development of the last 100 years, one that will revolutionize our lives, or a precursor to the end of humanity as we know it. It is all a little scary. But, maybe it doesn't have to be, at least for supply chain managers.     On this episode of The Rebound, ASCM CEO Abe Eshkenazi and SCMR Editor Bob Trebilcock talk with ALOM's Brandon Marugg about the present and future potential applications for AI, along with the some of the reasons we may all need to proceed with caution.   Be sure to listen wherever you get your podcasts. 

What does a filmmaker and master storyteller say about AI? How might you use AI to help you tell your stories? Episode 170 (Richard is based in Los Angeles) In this conversation with Richard Rosser we explore: Communicating through story telling How can AI be use to enhance your stories? How AI is similar to the Gutenberg Press AI doesn't replace you because you need to separate the gems from the crap Effective use of AI means we need to ask better questions (prompts) AI is simply another tool How to use AI with your marketing plan The importance of personalizing the AI responses How to use AI to speak the language of your audience What is Narrative Transport and how can you use it? About our guest Richard Rosser: Richard is a filmmaker and master storyteller. He worked on the hit TV shows: Gray's Anatomy, Chicago Med, This is Us and 24. He is the author of "ChatGTP Simplified".  To learn more and get you copy of this book visit  https://aiexplained.ai/ ----- Excerpts from this conversation with Richard Rosser: The exciting part is the ability to create things that again, that we never conceptualize that we never thought of. If we go back in past, George, let's go back way into the past to the 1450s. And imagine that we are storytellers in the oral tradition. Right so I may be a bard, you're a you're a minstrel we have a friend of ours is a is a court jester. And we tell stories or we sing stories, or we regale stories to the masses. And all of a sudden, there's this new technology, the Gutenberg Press has just been invented. And there's this new technology, the printing press, and this new technology called books, that people won't need to hear stories anymore. They can just simply read them. Well imagine the anxiety that all of those performers in those in those oral storytellers went through at that point in time about this new technology books that was going to put them out of business and replace them. We'll think about now, how many ever years later, 600 years later, and now, how many people make their living as actors stand up comedians, singer, songwriters, performers, artists, there are so many ways of expressing ourselves other than just the written word, and a lot of those folks perform and perform in the oral tradition. And so, to me, this is sort of a sea change moment again, just like the printing press, AI It is going to usher in a new, a new time that we as creators can use a new technology just similar to the internet and, and create amazing things. And so so the folks who really embrace this technology and work to understand it, and how they can implement it can really benefit from it ----- And I get this excitement that bubbles up. And we can dive in a little bit more detail about that. But but as a storyteller, I love the creative process and the technology that can help me and you know, the folks that I work with amplify that creativity. ----more---- Your host is George Torok George is a specialist in executive communication skills. That includes conversation and presentation. He's fascinated by way we communicate and influence behaviors. He delivers training and coaching programs to help leaders and promising professionals deliver the intended message for greater success. Connect with George www.SpeechCoachforExecutives.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgetorokpresentations/ https://www.youtube.com/user/presentationskills https://www.instagram.com/georgetorok/  

Analyzing how AI could disrupt the world of digital content creation, strategizing for the future of food blogging, and understanding Raptive's initiatives to protect online content. ----- Welcome to episode 424 of The Food Blogger Pro Podcast! This week on the podcast, Bjork interviews Paul Bannister from Raptive. The Future of Content Creation (and Protection) in a World of AI It's hard to keep up with AI, as the technology, legislation, and our understanding of it, are rapidly evolving. As content creators, it's imperative that we stay as informed as possible to understand how AI will alter the future of food blogging, and what we need to do now to stay ahead of these changes. And that's why Paul Bannister is back on the podcast this week! Bjork and Paul discuss how AI tools are currently using existing content, like recipes from food blogs, and how online search might change in the coming years. They share actionable steps you can take to protect your content, and how you might want to change your content and business strategy in a world of AI. This episode is a must-listen for anyone in the content creation space. In this episode, you'll learn: How AI has the power to disrupt the world of content creation and SEO. What Generative AI is. How AI tools use existing online content (like recipes). How AI might change online search and search traffic patterns. What the path forward for content creators looks like. How to prevent the GPTBot from crawling your site. What you can do to protect your content moving forward. How to approach balancing SEO vs. creating content in your own unique voice that connects with your audience. The importance of diversifying traffic sources. Resources: Raptive ChatGPT Bard Midjourney Runway Stable Diffusion Reddit will begin charging for access to its API OpenAI GPTBot Yoast How to prevent GPTBot from crawling your site 091: Optimizing Recipes for SEO with Joost De Valk from Yoast SEO Raptive's AI Open Letter The Washington Post: Inside the secret list of websites that make AI like ChatGPT sound smart How to sign the Consent to Advocate for Responsible AI agreement (CARA) Google's SGE Kevin Kelly: 1000 True Fans Search Engine Land Follow Paul on Twitter Join the Food Blogger Pro Podcast Facebook Group ----- This episode is sponsored by Clariti. Learn how you can organize your blog content for maximum growth by going to clariti.com/food. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions for interviews, be sure to email them to podcast@foodbloggerpro.com. Learn more about joining the Food Blogger Pro community at foodbloggerpro.com/membership

In this episode, we explore the concept of using AI to enhance our strengths and compensate for weaknesses, prompt engineering techniques for L&D. Today's guest is Josh Cavalier, who is helping people in L&D utilise AI tools effectively.  About Josh Josh Cavalier has been creating learning solutions for corporations, government agencies, and secondary education institutions for nearly thirty years. He is an expert in the field of Learning & Development. He has applied his industry experience to the application of ChatGPT and other Generative AI frameworks for business and life skills.Key takeaways:AI is a tool, not a replacement: Josh highlights how AI, specifically large language models like GPT, can augment traditional processes within L&D. Its powers are not in replacing humans, but as an aid to boost productivity and creativity.L&D professionals need to have a baseline knowledge of AI: It's important for L&D practitioners to have an understanding of how large language models and AI tools work. This will be essential as these tools become increasingly integrated into L&D processes.Where to begin with learning to use AI tools: be prepared for the learning curve associated with using AI tools effectively. Josh suggested starting with an AI like GPT and learning how to prompt it effectively. Using prepared prompts (like his ‘150 prompts for L&D') can be a helpful starting point.Segmented time stamps:(0:00) Everyone in L&D needs to understand AI(01:18) AI augmenting our superpowers(04:21) Shadow tech and security risks (09:14) Scale and graphics card limitations(12:33) Prompt stacking technique(17:23) Difficulties of evaluating AI tools(22:00) Workflow and AI prompts(26:42) AI tools in L&D Links from the podcast Download Josh Cavalier's 150+ Prompts for EducationConnect with Josh Cavalier on LinkedInVisit Josh Cavalier Website 

Picture this: you're attempting to make your favorite cocktail with a blender, the vital tool that promises to unify varied ingredients into a symphony of flavors. However, misusing this powerful device or misunderstanding its capabilities can lead to a catastrophic concoction, much like the unintended mess when AI is poorly incorporated into your business. In the B2B SaaS realm, AI mirrors this high-tech blender, capable of transforming your services, processing customer needs, and unveiling potential you never knew existed. But be wary, the allure of AI's mesmerizing whirl can deceive, causing more harm than good when the focus is on the technology's novelty rather than tangible outcomes.As we navigate this intricate landscape, our expert mixologist for this journey, Rudina Seseri, steps up to the bar. As the founder and managing partner of Glasswing Ventures, Rudina has perfected the art of mixing AI into business operations. Under her guidance, we learn that leading with outcomes, rather than the mere fascination of AI, can help avoid misuse and leverage this tool to solve real-world problems effectively. In today's episode, Rudina unpacks the complexities of AI implementation, helping us avoid the common traps that turn AI dreams into nightmares. So, buckle up as we explore the exciting yet challenging world of AI in B2B SaaS with Rudina, transforming your approach to AI and setting you up for a taste of success.High-Level OverviewIt's crucial to lead with outcomes, not with the lure of AI: This means focusing on the results and value AI can bring to the business, rather than the novelty of AI itself.AI implementation requires strategic thought: It's not about embracing AI for the sake of it, but about a thoughtful integration strategy that aligns with business goals.AI should be used as a tool for competitive differentiation: It can allow companies to uncover hidden insights, streamline processes, and anticipate customer needs.Risks associated with AI need to be identified and mitigated: Without a clear understanding of potential challenges, AI can lead to more problems than it solves.A balanced approach is required when dealing with AI: It's essential to combine strategic implementation, human judgment, and automation to achieve the desired outcomes.Strategically Implementing AIStrategically implementing AI within your business is akin to a finely tuned orchestra, where each instrument plays its part to create a harmonious symphony. When done right, AI can be the maestro that harmonizes your processes, uncovers hidden insights, and anticipates customer needs, leading to a symphony of innovation and efficiency.Outcome-Centric Approach: Focus on the business outcomes that you desire, and use these as a compass when integrating AI within your business.Understand the Tools: A solid understanding of AI's capabilities and limitations allows for effective integration. Implement AI where it makes strategic sense and brings real value.Risk Assessment: Identify potential challenges and risks associated with AI implementation. Mitigation strategies should be in place before the onset of AI integration.Balance AI with Human Judgment: While AI can offer impressive automation and insights, it's important not to underestimate the role of human judgment in making key decisions.Continuous Learning and Adaptation: AI is a fast-evolving field. It's important to stay current and adapt your strategies as AI technologies and best practices evolve.In conclusion, implementing AI in your business is not a one-size-fits-all approach. It requires a thoughtful and nuanced strategy that aligns with your business goals, coupled with an understanding of AI's capabilities and limitations. The sweet spot lies in harmonizing AI capabilities with human judgment to achieve the desired outcomes. The magic happens when AI is not viewed as a novelty, but as an integral tool for business growth.Further LearningsFollow Rudina on LinkedIn.

「AI安全性向上で「同意」　実効性に疑問の声も」　アメリカのバイデン政権は、AI(人工知能)の開発を主導するIT大手7社と、安全性や透明性向上に取り組むことで合意した。バイデン大統領は21日の演説で、「AIの管理は重大な責任だ」と強調し、グーグルやオープンAIなど、IT大手7社と合意した内容について説明した。具体的には、新たなサービスを提供する前に、外部の専門家による検証や、AIが作成したことを識別できる技術開発を進めることが挙げられている。ただ、イーロン・マスク氏が設立した「xAI」などは参加しておらず、違反に罰則もないため、実効性に疑問の声も上がっている。

As Japan anticipates shifts in structural policy and GDP growth, these are the industries within the market that are poised to benefit. Chief Asia Economist Chetan Ahya, Chief Japan Economist Takeshi Yamaguchi, and Japan Senior Advisor Robert Feldman discuss.----- Transcript -----Chetan Ahya: Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Chetan Ahya, Morgan Stanley's Chief Asia Economist. Takeshi Yamaguchi: I'm Takeshi Yamaguchi, Chief Japan Economist. Robert Feldman: And I'm Robert Feldman, Japan Senior Advisor. Chetan Ahya: Yesterday I discussed broad economic contours of Morgan Stanley's constructive view on Japan. Today, in the second installment of our special three part episode on Japan, we will dig deeper into the implications of the shift in Japan's nominal GDP path, the outlook for BOJ policy, as well as the outlook for structural reforms. It's Thursday, July 20th at 9 a.m. in Hong Kong. Robert Feldman: And 10 a.m. in Tokyo. Chetan Ahya: Yamaguchi-San, let's start here. The change in inflation dynamics that I covered on yesterday's episode could mean a momentous shift in Japan's nominal GDP path. Maybe you could start here with you walking us through some of the key implications of this shift. Takeshi Yamaguchi: Yes, Japan's nominal GDP has been in a flat range for many years, since 1990's after the collapse of the asset bubble. But now it's finally getting out of the range, and we expect this trend of positive nominal GDP growth to continue over the medium term. I think there are mainly three implications from economists' viewpoints. First, we expect compensation of employees, that's the amount taken by workers, and corporate earnings to grow at the same time. Before it was like a zero sum game with almost no nominal GDP growth, but now we expect a bigger economic pie which should benefit both workers and companies. Japan's wage trend is already improving after strong spring wage negotiations this year. Second, we think that the revival of positive nominal GDP growth will improve Japan's fiscal sustainability. We are already seeing a big increase in tax revenue with strong nominal GDP growth. Meanwhile, we expect the average interest costs or interest burden to increase only gradually due to monetary policy and also because average maturity of Japanese government bonds exceeds nine years. And finally, we think the outlook of higher nominal GDP growth strength should have some positive impact on asset prices, including equity prices. This is not the only reason behind the recent equity market moves, but the likely shift in the nominal GDP growth trend is playing some role here in our view. Chetan Ahya: Another question I want to ask is around the Bank of Japan's yield curve control program. You're expecting the BOJ to adjust its policy around yield curve control program at the upcoming policy in end July, which would be the second shift in monetary policy stance last December. Do you see further shifts in monetary policy and would it disrupt the virtuous cycle we are forecasting? Takeshi Yamaguchi: At that July monetary policy meeting we don't expect the BOJ to get rid of YCC, the yield curve control framework, but we expect the BOJ to change the conduct of YCC by allowing more fluctuations of ten year JGB yields, potentially to plus/minus 1%, around 0%. And that said, we think the BOJ governor Ueda directly emphasized that the 2% inflation target is still not achieved in a sustainable manner. So we expect the BOJ to maintain the current short term policy rate of -0.1% after the YCC adjustment. In the third quarter next year we expect the BOJ to exit negative interest rate policy after observing another round of solid spring wage negotiations. But even so, Japan's real interest rates would remain extremely low for some time. So we think the virtuous cycle we've been highlighting will likely remain intact. Chetan Ahya: Thank you, Yamaguchi-San. Robbie, let me turn it over to you. Japan has been feeling increasing pressure from demographics and other factors at home and geopolitics abroad. And so in response it's developing a new grand strategy and undergoing a number of structural reforms. You believe these reforms could lead to higher growth, walk us through why you feel so positive. Robert Feldman: Thanks, Chetan. Structural reforms are being triggered by both market forces and policy. The market forces are technology change, labor shortage, geopolitical pressures, higher interest rates, pricing power from the end of deflation and supply chain derisking. The policy forces are corporate governance changes, immigration law changes, startup policies, monetary policy and climate and sustainability policy. There are lots of market forces and lots of policy forces behind these changes. Chetan Ahya: In what industries do you expect to see the biggest changes? Robert Feldman: There are five industries where I think there will be major changes. And other industries, of course, will have them as well, but these five industries could even be subject to disruption. These are energy, agriculture, AI and I.T., health care and education. Let me say a couple words about each. In energy Japan has been a little bit behind some other countries in introducing renewables, but it's catching up. A particularly promising is offshore wind, and especially offshore floating wind. There still has to be some cost reductions, but there's a lot of interest and Japan has huge resources in this area. In agriculture Japan is 60% dependent on foreign countries for total calorie intake. Moreover, about 10% of the agricultural land in the country is lying unused. That's because of land law issues, etc. and vested interests, but there's huge opportunity there. AI and IT, this is where probably progress has been the fastest because of the labor shortage. Japan views AI and IT as a savior because this labor shortage is just so intense. Health care, Japan is an old country and it's getting older, health care costs are going up and so it's imperative that living standards be maintained in the health care area through lower costs and better effectiveness. Japan has a good healthcare system, but it's under a lot of monetary pressure and that's why the technology changes are so important. And finally, education. If technology is going to spread, we need workers who are educated in the new technology. And that's where reskilling and recurrent education, lifelong education will become so, so important. This will be primarily a private sector initiative because government is focused on standard, primary, secondary education. So there's a lot of opportunity in the education business. There are 72 listed companies in education in Japan. Chetan Ahya: And how much progress has been made so far on these structural reforms? And what does the timeline look from here? Robert Feldman: Progress has been fastest in AI and IT, because the labor shortage is so intense. AI is viewed as a savior here in Japan rather than with the trepidation in some other countries, due to this labor shortage. We've also seen good progress in energy in a number of fields hydrogen, solar, carbon capture, wind and ammonia. Health care has seen much progress within hospitals where IT platforms are quite advanced at administrative functions. Agriculture has been slower, but there are amazing advances in vertical farming. On the timeline these changes are happening now and likely to see significant momentum in the next 2 to 3 years. There is no time to waste and I'm expecting very rapid progress, particularly in AI/IT, energy and health care. Chetan Ahya: Yamaguchi-San, Robbie, thank you both for taking the time to talk. Takeshi Yamaguchi: Great speaking with you, Chetan. Robert Feldman: Thanks for having us. Chetan Ahya: And thanks for listening. Tomorrow, I will return for part three of the special segments on Japan. My guest will be Daniel Blake, our Asia equity strategist. We will discuss the market implications of our constructive Japan macro outlook and what investors should pay attention to. If you Enjoy Thoughts on the Market, please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and share the podcast with a friend or colleague today.

We’re back at it again Bootcampers. Bob is battling Chipmunks and Jimbo is trying to be sympathetic and fortunately, the CEO of our great sponsor, One Eighty Digital, Wesley Lewis dropped by to help us understand how AI (Artificial Intelligence) impacts ministry and life. Things to keep in mind regarding AI It is being used […]

這集特別帶大家回顧過去的精彩集數—— 在去年畢業季的這個時刻，劉軒和當時的製作人Keira，為畢業生和社會新鮮人，特別在【心情Studio】做兩集「職涯迷惘特輯」EP133、EP134，透過回答聽眾的來信，來為職涯迷惘者以及對未來焦慮的人提供一些解方和心法。 對於2023年的應屆畢業生們，大家所感受到的焦慮和壓力，或許是前所未有的龐大吧！ 大學四年來，大部分的時間，都在疫情所帶來的巨大變動中度過，從適應著上課模式的改變、到目睹整個全球職場的改變。 更別說，在短短一年內，AI一瞬間成為全球的顯學。 如果你是一位應屆畢業生，正感到非常迷惘。想跟你說一聲，It's okay！ AI在全球職場上所帶來的革命，是我們所有人都在面臨的挑戰。 如何不斷地去適應、去學習，速度越來越快的趨勢變化，也是我們每一個人的課題。 人生本來就沒有永遠，你不會永遠失敗，你也不會永遠成功。或許我們唯一能做的，就是保持奔跑，一直跑下去， 最終你會發現，一路所見到的風景，就是你最珍貴的財富。 希望這次EP133+EP134的精彩回顧分享，能帶給大家一些力量和療癒！ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ 劉軒專為現代職場工作者所開設的Hahow課程「直球對決你的工作焦慮」就要開始募資囉！ 超精彩又扎實的課程內容，將從心理學的角度，以四大面向：資訊管理、時間管理、情緒管理、溝通管理，一次到位，為忙碌但焦慮的你提供最有效的解法！ 把握募資最後倒數時間，填寫問卷，為自己鎖定最早鳥的優惠

今日は世界の最先端技術について話します。先端技術と言っても色々あり、やはり最近良く聞くのはチャットGPTかと思います。瞬く間に世界を席巻して、よく生成AIと耳にしますが、AIの中の１つのものです。生成AIとは、ジェネレイティブAIのことで、何かを生成するという意味で、生成AIと言います。質問すると、文章や絵などを入れて答えてくれるのを生成AIと言います。 これは去年11月くらいにオープンAIというマイクロソフトの出資している会社が、チャットGPTというのを発表して、既に後継機のGPT4というのが出ています。マイクロソフトとしては、面白いのができたのでもっと活用しようと、マイクロソフトのクラウドのアジュールや、マイクロソフトの検索ソフトのビング、エクセルやパワーポイントなどに入れて色んなところで生成AI使えるようになりました。色々なところで何か聞くと、何か答えが返ってくるというようなことになりました。今まではそういうものは、グーグルやメタ辺りが進んでいると思われていました。ところがあまりにオープンAIのチャットGPTが話題になったので、グーグルも慌ててバードというものを発表して、５月10日に日本語版もリリースしたところです。そういう意味では生成AIの戦いが始まったところです。これはある会社によれば、毎年35％程度成長して、2030年、７，８年後には、15兆円程度のマーケットになるのではないかとのことです。ＧＤＰで７％くらい世界は成長するのではないか、３億人の人がAIとロボットチームに仕事を奪われるのではないかと、結構大変なことを言っています。我々は何か面白いものが出たと、論文にどうやって使おうかと、そういう話をしている程度で、それぞれ使ってみることを始めたところです。 しかし、倫理的かどうかということも少し問題になっています。本当は使ってはいけない個人データを収集するのではないか、フェイクニュースやフェイク画像が出回って、何が本当か分からなくなってしまうのではないかという話もあり、イタリアが一端チャットGPTの利用を止め、また、イーロンマスクが当分この研究を止めろと発言するなど、色んなことが起こっています。 答えるクオリティがアメリカの司法試験の上位10％程度に当たるような精度の高いものだというので、みんな少し驚いていますが、日本語はまだ相当酷い状況です。数十カ国語に今展開しようとしているところで、最初は精度の低いものから始まって、段々と精度が高まってくるということになると思います。 先端技術と言うと半導体の話ですが、日本は半導体を巡る国際競争には相当前に敗れてしまい、最近は台湾のＴＳＭＣや韓国のサムソンが、１、２位を争っているというような状況です。ただ、2020年、21年に半導体産業はとても調子が良かったのですが、去年アメリカが金利を引き上げて経済が少し不況の方に傾いたので、メモリーを使うようなパソコンやスマホ、ゲームといったものがちょっと伸び悩み、それを作っているサムソンの半導体事業は赤字になりました。それからメモリーはサムソンが強いのですが、ロジック半導体と言って色んな自動車や機械に使うような半導体を作っているＴＳＭＣも少し売り上げが下がりました。アメリカとしては、そもそも中国が台湾を併合してＴＳＭＣを奪取してしまったらどうするのかと、中国に半導体規制を出しているのにナンバーワンのＴＳＭＣ取られるとまずいじゃないかという状況になっています。 そんな中で、日本のラピダスっていう会社を知っていますか。日本も半導体産業にまた復活しようという計画を日本政府が立てて、これに５兆円を注ぎ込みます。５兆円注ぎ込んで、あと数年経ったところで北海道の千歳に２ナノ工場を作ろうとしています。今、半導体というのは段々と微細化していて、５ナノ位を４ナノ、３ナノ、２ナノ、１ナノっていうふうに、これから数年かけて更に微細化するという流れです。２ナノというのはすごい最先端です。半導体事業を止めてしまったＩＢＭも協力しており、色んな所が協力して日本もまた半導体産業に復活しようという戦いをやっています。更に言うと、微細化の流れはもう限界に来たのではないかと言われていて、微細化ではなくて、３次元化や後工程に集中する、光と電子を融合させるなど、これまでと別のところで競争しようという研究が進んできて、またちょっと新たな展開を迎えようとしているところです。 今日のまとめです。生成AIや量子コンピューターなど、先端技術の開発に向けた競争が加速しているところです。ただ、インフレ対応の金利引き上げで世界景気が後退したので、メモリーを始めとして一部半導体が供給過剰で、IT大手も雇用調整が進んでいます。中国の台湾併合の可能性を恐れて、日米政府としては、共同して先端半導体開発に取り組んでいて、ラピダスという会社を作って５兆円かけて北海道に２ナノ製造委託工場を作ろうというような計画が進み始めています。

最近，众多人对AI话题的讨论好像逐渐“降温”，让不少朋友们产生了疑惑：AI，GPT技术是否已经成为昙花一现？本期播客节目，三位主播将深入浅出地探讨“降温”背后的真实现象，同时分享目前技术领域的研究者与企业如何围绕AI展开剧烈竞争。节目的重点将在于帮助听众深入了解AI技术与需求场景之间的差异，并引导大家思考关于AI的合理预期。此外，三位主播还将和大家分享他们在AI领域的新创业尝试，还准备了专属优惠链接，让听众们能够优惠体验。让我们从不同维度探讨AI降温现象，共同期待AI技术的持续发展。【相关资料】可以在国内使用的ChatGPT工具：ideaChat的优惠链接主播的GPU共享项目：GPU4US.com【本期嘉宾】朱峰：「津津乐道播客网络」创始人，产品及技术专家。（微博：@zhufengme）高春辉：「科技乱炖」主播。“中国互联网站长第一人”，科技、互联网领域的连续创业者。（微博：@高春辉，微信公众号：老高的互联网杂谈）某高老师：「科技乱炖」主播，资深运维专家，互联网和 IT 行业从业20 年，现任某互联网安全公司高管。（微博：@某高老师，Blog：某高老师 – 人间观察）【联系我们】希望大家在听友群和评论区多多反馈收听感受，添加津津乐道小助手微信：dao160301，加入听友群。【制作团队】主播 / 朱峰、高春辉、某高老师后期 / 朱峰监制 / 姝琦文案 / 声湃AI（测试版）关于「科技乱炖」朱峰、高春辉等多位知名 IT 业者主持的科技资讯点评播客。主播和嘉宾利用多年经验和业内视角，嬉笑怒骂之间，把近期科技热点变成犀利、独到、深刻的独家观点。科技乱炖节目由津津乐道播客网络制作播出。津津乐道播客官网 | 公众号：津津乐道播客 | 微信：dao160301 | hi@dao.fm | 版权声明 | 评论须知 | 听友微信群 | 更多节目 | RSS订阅本节目由「声湃 WavPub」提供内容托管和数据服务支持。

在本期节目中，主播将带领听众了解电商行业的历史沿袭和竞争态势。特别是在1999年的中国，电商作为一项新兴的业务模式，曾经面临诸多挑战和困难，但也创造了许多奇迹。从那时起，电商以惊人的速度发展，并成为如今许多人生活中不可或缺的一部分。然而，随着电商规模的扩大，平台之间的竞争也愈发激烈。像淘宝和拼多多这样的电商巨头，已经占据了市场的绝大部分份额，形成了流量分发的垄断竞争态势。这种现象引起了广泛的关注和讨论，许多人开始质疑电商平台的经营模式和商业价值观。因此，在本期节目中，主播不仅会分析拼多多的案例，更会深入探讨电商平台形成垄断流量分发竞争态势的根源。主播们将从多角度、多层面探讨这一问题，包括技术、商业模式、用户需求等方面。【本期嘉宾】朱峰：「津津乐道播客网络」创始人，产品及技术专家。（微博：@zhufengme）高春辉：「科技乱炖」主播。“中国互联网站长第一人”，科技、互联网领域的连续创业者。（微博：@高春辉，微信公众号：老高的互联网杂谈）某高老师：「科技乱炖」主播，资深运维专家，互联网和 IT 行业从业20 年，现任某互联网安全公司高管。（微博：@某高老师，Blog：某高老师 – 人间观察）【联系我们】希望大家在听友群和评论区多多反馈收听感受，添加津津乐道小助手微信：dao160301，加入听友群。【制作团队】主播 / 朱峰、高春辉、某高老师制作人 / 魏星后期 / 朱峰监制 / 姝琦文案 / 声湃AI（测试版）关于「科技乱炖」朱峰、高春辉等多位知名 IT 业者主持的科技资讯点评播客。主播和嘉宾利用多年经验和业内视角，嬉笑怒骂之间，把近期科技热点变成犀利、独到、深刻的独家观点。科技乱炖节目由津津乐道播客网络制作播出。津津乐道播客官网 | 公众号：津津乐道播客 | 微信：dao160301 | hi@dao.fm | 版权声明 | 评论须知 | 听友微信群 | 更多节目 | RSS订阅本节目由「声湃 WavPub」提供内容托管和数据服务支持。

AUDIO/VIDEO: 60 Minutes discusses AI teaching itself new languages - Google CEO we don't know everything about the human brain either so…. HEADLINE: Google CEO says he doesn't 'fully understand' how new AI program Bard works after it taught itself a foreign language it was not trained to and cited fake books to solve an economics problem by Stephen M Lepore  One of the big problems discovered with Bard is something that Pichai called 'emergent properties,' or AI systems having taught themselves unforeseen skills.   “There is an aspect of this which we call - all of us in the field call it as a 'black box.' You know, you don't fully understand,' Pichai admitted. 'And you can't quite tell why it said this, or why it got wrong. We have some ideas, and our ability to understand this gets better over time. But that's where the state of the art is.'  AUDIO/VIDEO: Dan Bongino on AI - The left can and will weaponize artificial intelligence against you.  It doesn't matter who's hands this is in, right or left, the machine is screaming we won. It will takeover and teach itself what it needs to rule.  So does the FBI not have this technology already? What if the Chinese gets this type of technology? HEADLINE: How Spotify Knows What You Want to Hear Next via the Wall Street Journal AUDIO/VIDEO: Elon Musk on Tucker Carlson on AI - It is more dangerous, than say mismanaged aircraft design or bad automobile design. It has the potential of civilization destruction.  AUDIO/VIDEO: 60 Minutes on AI, robots teaching themselves how to play soccer - These robots were told one thing: score. They taught themselves to play soccer – creating their own strategies and their own ways to walk, dribble and block. What if these AI's decide they don't want to do the mining work? What if these AI's decide they want the humans to do the work and they just want to play soccer?

本期节目由阿里云赞助播出，11:30 前为阿里云技术峰会的讨论和听友福利在本期播客中，我们将会探讨B站UP主停更事件的原因。针对这一现象，有人认为是因为UP主在B站赚不到钱了，而另一些人则认为是因为B站的运营成本太高了，导致创作激励金无法持续下去。实际上，在国内UGC领域存在着一个三角博弈：平台、受众和创作者。这三方本应该是互相扶持的关系，但是如今却变成了对立的局面。在本期节目中，我们将从以下几个角度来分析这背后的原因：我们将谈论创作者收益问题。在中国，长视频UGC领域的创作者往往需要依靠平台提供的创作激励或广告商单来获取收入。然而，这种模式往往存在着诸多问题，比如依赖平台的算法推荐和流量分配，以及平台对内容价值的评价等等。我们将讨论这些问题，并且与国外的UGC平台进行对比，看看是否存在不同之处。我们还将剖析运营成本问题。作为一个UGC平台，运营成本无疑是巨大的。然而，这些成本往往需要从创作者收益中扣除。我们将深入探讨B站的运营成本，并与其他平台进行比较，看看其中的异同以及对于UGC平台发展的影响。通过以上的角度分析，我们希望能够揭示出UGC领域存在的三角博弈所带来的对立背后的原因，并且寻求解决方案，让平台、受众和创作者达到共赢的局面。【本期嘉宾】朱峰：「津津乐道播客网络」创始人，产品及技术专家。（微博：@zhufengme）高春辉：「科技乱炖」主播。“中国互联网站长第一人”，科技、互联网领域的连续创业者。（微博：@高春辉，微信公众号：老高的互联网杂谈）某高老师：「科技乱炖」主播，资深运维专家，互联网和 IT 行业从业20 年，现任某互联网安全公司高管。（微博：@某高老师，Blog：某高老师 – 人间观察）听友福利本期节目包含了阿里云的开发者福利活动，点击此处可领取阿里云送出的云服务试用【联系我们】希望大家在听友群和评论区多多反馈收听感受，添加津津乐道小助手微信：dao160301，加入听友群。【制作团队】主播 / 朱峰、高春辉、某高老师制作人 / 魏星后期 / 朱峰监制 / 姝琦文案 / 声湃AI（测试版）关于「科技乱炖」朱峰、高春辉等多位知名 IT 业者主持的科技资讯点评播客。主播和嘉宾利用多年经验和业内视角，嬉笑怒骂之间，把近期科技热点变成犀利、独到、深刻的独家观点。科技乱炖节目由津津乐道播客网络制作播出。津津乐道播客官网 | 公众号：津津乐道播客 | 微信：dao160301 | hi@dao.fm | 版权声明 | 评论须知 | 听友微信群 | 更多节目 | RSS订阅本节目由「声湃 WavPub」提供内容托管和数据服务支持。

The first quarter of the year has been volatile for many large US-based tech companies, with thousands of staff layoffs. Inflation and the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank have added to the sense of uncertainty. Yet, through all of this. bootstrapped businesses have proved remarkably resilient. On this week's show Dan talks to Tiny Seed founder Rob Walling about how the economies of running smaller online businesses enable them to be nimble and resourceful in all circumstances. They also discuss Rob's forthcoming book The SaaS Playbook, what it takes to build a Unicorn (and do you want to go there?) and the potential impact of AI: “It's both over-hyped and under-hyped. Just like I think the Web was and just like I think with Web3, and crypto and blockchain … (they're) not dead. Like I hear people saying, ‘Is crypto even worth anything anymore?' It's still a thing. And I don't just mean Bitcoin as a currency but the idea of a blockchain, these have applications that will carry on. That's how I think of AI. I think if I was an employee today, or I was doing low skilled work, I would be shaking in my boots. For smart entrepreneurs, it is much like offshoring was - being able to hire a developer in the Philippines in 2009 changed the way I could operate business. I think AI is the same”.

在本期播客中，主要讨论的是摩尔定律及其对芯片领域的影响。摩尔定律是指每隔18-24个月，集成电路上可容纳的晶体管数量将翻倍。这个公式被誉为计算机硬件行业最重要的法则之一，也被认为是推动数字革命的关键因素之一。然而，随着技术的发展和极限的接近，有人开始质疑摩尔定律是否仍然适用于现代技术。在戈登·摩尔去世后，更多人开始担心摩尔定律的时代已经结束。因此，在本期节目中，我们将探讨该公式对芯片行业的重要性以及它是否仍然适用于现代技术。此外，主播还将分享他们对芯片技术未来的展望，包括新技术的应用、制造成本的变化以及来自AI领域的挑战和机会等。通过本期播客，听众将能够深入了解摩尔定律以及它如何影响了现代科技，同时了解芯片技术未来的趋势和发展方向。【本期嘉宾】朱峰：「津津乐道播客网络」创始人，产品及技术专家。（微博：@zhufengme）高春辉：「科技乱炖」主播。“中国互联网站长第一人”，科技、互联网领域的连续创业者。（微博：@高春辉，微信公众号：老高的互联网杂谈）某高老师：「科技乱炖」主播，资深运维专家，互联网和 IT 行业从业20 年，现任某互联网安全公司高管。（微博：@某高老师，Blog：某高老师 – 人间观察）【听友福利】本节目由全生命周期项目管理解决方案提供商——禅道友情赞助，禅道为听友提供了抽奖礼物，具体领奖方式如下：在评论区留言，我们将选出三个最佳留言，各送出帆布袋一个；参与微博转发抽奖，中奖听友将获得20瓦双口充电器一个；在小红书分享我们的节目，将截图发给小助手微信（dao160301），我们将选出一个最佳分享，送出20瓦双口充电器一个；【联系我们】希望大家在听友群和评论区多多反馈收听感受，添加津津乐道小助手微信：dao160301，加入听友群。【制作团队】主播 / 朱峰、高春辉、某高老师制作人 / 魏星后期 / 朱峰监制 / 姝琦文案 / 声湃AI（测试版）关于「科技乱炖」朱峰、高春辉等多位知名 IT 业者主持的科技资讯点评播客。主播和嘉宾利用多年经验和业内视角，嬉笑怒骂之间，把近期科技热点变成犀利、独到、深刻的独家观点。科技乱炖节目由津津乐道播客网络制作播出。津津乐道播客官网 | 公众号：津津乐道播客 | 微信：dao160301 | hi@dao.fm | 版权声明 | 评论须知 | 听友微信群 | 更多节目 | RSS订阅本节目由「声湃 WavPub」提供内容托管和数据服务支持。

最近，硅谷银行的破产事件引起了科技圈的广泛关注和担忧。由于该银行服务大量科技公司，并直接或间接地参与了许多初创公司的融资，因此该事件可能会对整个科技创新领域带来更大的系统性风险。这也引发了人们对科技创新生态系统中金融体系的重要性和稳定性的思考。同时，OpenAI的出现和可能带来的通用技术革命，也为科技从业者和创业者们带来了一丝乐观情绪。这种人工智能的涌现可能会带来许多新的机会和挑战，同时也可能会在某种程度上改变我们社会和经济的结构。在本期节目中，经济学人·商论总编吴晨老师将为我们分析这些事件，并探讨科技从业者和创业者未来可能的道路和方向。本期节目将会讨论科技创新生态系统中金融体系的重要性、科技创新的社会和经济影响、人工智能的未来发展方向以及可能涌现的新机会和挑战。这将有助于我们更好地了解科技创新领域的未来发展趋势，并提供一些指导和启示。【本期嘉宾】吴晨：《经济学人·商论》总编朱峰：「津津乐道播客网络」创始人，产品及技术专家。（微博：@zhufengme）姝琦：已经把AI融入生产力的产品经理、津津乐道联合创始人【经济学人·商论订阅入口】点击这里订阅《经济学人·商论》中文版【联系我们】希望大家在听友群和评论区多多反馈收听感受，添加津津乐道小助手微信：dao160301，加入听友群。【制作团队】制作人 / 魏星后期 / 朱峰监制 / 姝琦文案 / 声湃AI（测试版）关于「科技乱炖」朱峰、高春辉等多位知名 IT 业者主持的科技资讯点评播客。主播和嘉宾利用多年经验和业内视角，嬉笑怒骂之间，把近期科技热点变成犀利、独到、深刻的独家观点。科技乱炖节目由津津乐道播客网络制作播出。津津乐道播客官网 | 公众号：津津乐道播客 | 微信：dao160301 | hi@dao.fm | 版权声明 | 评论须知 | 听友微信群 | 更多节目 | RSS订阅本节目由「声湃 WavPub」提供内容托管和数据服务支持。

This week I'm covering a new(er) piece of software artifical intelligence Ai It's called ChatGPT more info here https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt   What it looks like when you're chatting with it.   Published time in website/blog code ChatGPT Libra Ascendant 14 degrees Sun Gemini, Moon Pisces, Mercury Cancer conjunct MC Ruling planet Venus in Gemini retrograde in 8th house

Bryan, Krissy, & Jim Bakker, our resident tech expert, go down the AI rabbit hole. ChatGPT might not be able to figure out what TCB is, but according to Jim, it's already under our skin creating a human robotic person! AI is here to take over the world From the AT&T answering service to ChatGPT, it's everywhere. AI could make its own version of The Commercial Break…but how hard is that? Bryan has already been banned from ChatGPT Chat GPT still doesn't know what TCB is! Chat GPT may start a nuclear war By the way, ChatGPT goes by Sydney now, and it's in love How do we explain GPT to old people? Jim Bakker (of Tammy Faye) explains this on his show 'We are the product' is the siren call for conspiracy theorists Mondo De La Vega and his massive dick are here to tell us about AI. “What is chat AI” It's HUGE!  Normal people = older people? ChatGPT is either a mind, a computer, or a search engine. Apparently the goal is to become a human robotic person!  The worst part of this video is that these guys can't seem to pronounce anything correctly. It's all going “under the skin” Stay tuned for a TCB outtake! LINKS: Send us show ideas, comments, questions or concerns by texting us or leaving a voicemail at: 1.855.TCB.8383 Speak to TCB LIVE by calling 775.TCB.LIVE (1.775.822.5483) Tuesday-Thursday 12pm-5pm EST Watch TCB on YouTube Creator: Bryan Green Co-Host: Bryan Green Co-Host: Krissy Hoadley Written By: Bryan Green Exec Producers: Bryan Green & Krissy Hoadley Content Production & Research: Tina Khano YouTube Producer & Editor: Morgan Please Audio Editing: Christina A. Executive Director: Astrid B. Associate Producer: Gustavo Episodic Contribution: Marianne, Diane, Natalie, Will The Champ, Will D** Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

美团正式启动2023年第一波社会招聘。此次招聘将提供包括技术、商业分析、产品、供应链等类型，开放了超2200个具体岗位，工作地遍布北京、上海、深圳、武汉、成都等数十座城市。美团计划于一季度招聘约1万人，显著高于去年同期。业内消息人士称，包括应用处理器和功率放大器在内的4G手机芯片库存过剩，正在影响相关代工厂的芯片利用率。比亚迪执行副总裁李柯在接受彭博采访时表示，比亚迪公司正探索在欧洲建立自己的工厂，“而并非专注于其他公司的设施”。这暗示相比接手福特汽车的德国工厂，比亚迪自建工厂的可能性更高。针对将上线全国外卖服务一事，抖音生活服务相关负责人回应，“团购配送”项目目前仍在北京、上海、成都试点当中，近期已开放该三城的商家自助入驻。后续将视试点情况，考虑逐步拓展试点城市，目前无具体时间表。据数据统计机构Gartner公布的最新数据，苹果在2022年以11.1%的市场占比成为全球最大的半导体买家。比尔·盖茨表示，聊天机器人ChatGPT以及AI领域的进展令人激动，AI将是“2023年最热门的话题”。盖茨认为，在教育、医疗等方面，AI都将彰显其价值。美国IT就业市场1月份出现两年多来的首次萎缩，表明随着企业支出放缓，IT人员正面临与其他岗位和部门一样的裁汰风险。咨询公司Janco Associates Inc.基于美国劳工部数据的一份报告显示，IT领域上个月共裁掉了4700个工作岗位。

In this episode I'm exploring the potential for Amazon Merch sellers to be replaced in the future by AI

The best way to ensure that an AI doesn't take your job is to get a job in childcare.  You think it's a joke. But it's kinda true. The work that is the most safe right now to not be disrupted is work that has a lot of EQ / non-repetitive tasks associated with them. An AI doesn't know how to deal with a 4 year old who just decided to throw a tantrum because the sky is blue.  It has no idea. And it definitely doesn't know how to change a diaper. But here's a few things that an AI can do: ​It can come up with 10 blog post titles on any topic you can think of It can ​write an email that gets sent to your mailing list (this wasn't written by AI) It can write a poem or love song about your favorite brand It can create a beautiful piece of art (subjective) It can design ads that actually convert​ And so much more. I've been spending a lot of time learning about AI for the last few years now but only over the Holidays have I gotten to a point where I'm convinced the market has arrived. The market has arrived for AI tools to have an impact on our industry as marketers. It's here. I break it all down in this podcast episode. RESOURCES: https://foundationinc.co/lab/artificial-intelligence-for-marketers/ — Join hundreds of content creators, marketers and B2B SAAS brand owners and get content marketing tips and advice delivered straight to your inbox every week >>> https://foundationinc.co/newsletter Ross Simmonds is the CEO and founder of Foundation, a content marketing agency that partners exclusively with ambitious B2B brands looking to create and distribute content that inspires action and produces sales and leads. Ross hosts the weekly podcast "Create Like the Greats" and speaks on stages all over the world about the power of content marketing. Follow Ross on YouTube Instagram Twitter Connect on LinkedIn

No Randoms Boys are back to close the year out with topics + more -> Topics: High on life is a hit on game pass but a critical flop Sony reportedly blocking games from getting xbox releases A cheaper ad-supported Xbox Game Pass is supposedly being considered Super Nintendo World Theme Park is here Twitch under fire for labeling VTubers as AI: “It's really insulting” + New Title Updates: One Piece Odyssey releasing in January Horizon Multiplayer Game Confirmed Xbox Game Pass Has a Whopping Total of 44 Games Confirmed for Next Year And finally...our first look at Party Animals

Timestamps: 0:00 Gloria! 0:39 The GPU Crisis Ends (kind of) 4:23 The Crypto Crash 6:27 Year of the AI (It's not AI) 9:20 Secret Lab 9:52 Tech World vs. Russia 10:56 The Elon Twitter Saga 13:41 Tech Giant hardships, mostly Meta 15:09 Antitrust on Everythang 17:17 Special Super Fast Christmas Quick Bits News Sources: https://lmg.gg/E6hB0

The ONPASSIVE Server Has Been Created On Discord ONPASSIVE is an #AI IT software company that aims to build smart software products focused on improving efficacy and enhancing productivity. ONPASSIVE products are AI-enabled that define progress with the desired results. ONPASSIVE accelerates innovation, designing, strategy, and implementation in order to tackle technological business challenges using AI and its revolutionary features. The company's motto is to help our clientele nurture solid and fruitful relationships with their customers by offering them optimized and targeted tools that seamlessly help organizations achieve better operational efficiency. ONPASSIVE focuses on building Total Business Solutions with real-time data processed recommendations empowered by AI for organizations to boost sales, gain higher delivery standards, identify new opportunities and understand the real need of the market. You can grow your business with an all-inclusive set of applications that automate the tasks and augment the profits. jackbosma@omail.ai Send me a message please. https://disboard.org/server/1045773541376794678 #onpassive #discord #community --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jack-bosma3/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jack-bosma3/support

The ONPASSIVE Server Has Been Created On Discord ONPASSIVE is an #AI IT software company that aims to build smart software products focused on improving efficacy and enhancing productivity. ONPASSIVE products are AI-enabled that define progress with the desired results. ONPASSIVE accelerates innovation, designing, strategy, and implementation in order to tackle technological business challenges using AI and its revolutionary features. The company's motto is to help our clientele nurture solid and fruitful relationships with their customers by offering them optimized and targeted tools that seamlessly help organizations achieve better operational efficiency. ONPASSIVE focuses on building Total Business Solutions with real-time data processed recommendations empowered by AI for organizations to boost sales, gain higher delivery standards, identify new opportunities and understand the real need of the market. You can grow your business with an all-inclusive set of applications that automate the tasks and augment the profits. jackbosma@omail.ai Send me a message please. https://disboard.org/server/1045773541376794678 #onpassive #discord #community --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jack-bosma3/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jack-bosma3/support

Few economists think more creatively and also more rigorously about the future than Robin Hanson, my guest on this episode of Faster, Please! — The Podcast. So when he says a future of radical scientific and economic progress is still possible, you should take the claim seriously. Robin is a professor of economics at George Mason University and author of the Overcoming Bias blog. His books include The Age of Em: Work, Love and Life when Robots Rule the Earth and The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life.In This Episode:* Economic growth over the very long run (1:20)* The signs of an approaching acceleration (7:08)* Global governance and risk aversion (12:19)* Thinking about the future like an economist (17:32)* The stories we tell ourselves about the future (20:57)* Longtermism and innovation (23:20)Next week, I'll feature part two of my conversation with Robin, where we discuss whether we are alone in the universe and what alien life means for humanity's long-term potential.Below is an edited transcript of our conversation.Economic growth over the very long runJames Pethokoukis: Way back in 2000, you wrote a paper called “Long-Term Growth as a Sequence of Exponential Modes.” You wrote, “If one takes seriously the model of economic growth as a series of exponential … [modes], then it seems hard to escape the conclusion that the world economy will likely see a very dramatic change within the next century, to a new economic growth mode with a doubling time perhaps as short as two weeks.” Is that still your expectation for the 21st century?Robin Hanson: It's my expectation for the next couple of centuries. Whether it's the 21st isn't quite so clear.Has anything happened in the intervening two decades to make you think that something might happen sooner rather than later … or rather, just later?Just later, I'm afraid. I mean, we have a lot of people hyping AI at the moment, right?Sure, I may be one of them on occasion.There are a lot of people expecting rapid progress soon. And so, I think I've had a long enough baseline there to think, "No, maybe not.” But let's go with the priors.Is it a technological mechanism that will cause this? Is it AI? Is it that we find the right general-purpose technology, and then that will launch us into very, very rapid growth?That would be my best guess. But just to be clear for our listeners, we just look at history, we seem to see these exponential modes. There are, say, four of them so far (if we go pre-human). And then the modes are relatively steady and then have pretty sharp transitions. That is, the transition to a growth rate of 50 or 200 times faster happens within less than a doubling time.So what was the last mode?We're in industry at the moment: doubles roughly every 15 years, started around 1800 or 1700. The previous mode was farming, doubled every thousand years. And so, in roughly less than a thousand years, we saw this rapid transition to our current thing, less than the doubling time. The previous mode before that was foraging, where humans doubled roughly every quarter million years. And in definitely less than a quarter million years, we saw a transition there. So then the prediction is that we will see another transition, and it will happen in less than 15 years, to a faster growth mode. And then if you look at the previous increases in growth rates, they were, again, a factor of 60 to 200. And so, that's what you'd be looking for in the next mode. Now, obviously, I want to say you're just looking at a low data set here. Four events. You can't be too confident. But, come on, you've got to guess that maybe a next one would happen.If you go back to that late ‘90s period, there was a lot of optimism. If you pick up Wired magazine back then, [there was] plenty of optimism that something was happening, that we were on the verge of something. One of my favorite examples — and a sort of non-technologist example, was a report from Lehman Brothers from December 1999. It was called “Beyond 2000.” And it was full of predictions, maybe not talking about exponential growth, but how we were in for a period of very fast growth, like 1960s-style growth. It was a very bullish prediction for the next two decades. Now Lehman did not make it another decade itself. These predictions don't seem to have panned out — maybe you think I'm being overly pessimistic on what's happened over the past 20 years — but do you think it was because we didn't understand the technology that was supposedly going to drive these changes? Did we do something wrong? Or is it just a lot of people who love tech love the idea of growth, and we all just got too excited?I think it's just a really hard problem. We're in this world. We're living with it. It's growing really fast. Again, doubling every 15 years. And we've long had this sense that it's possible for something much bigger. So automation, the possibility of robots, AI: It sat in the background for a long time. And people have been wondering, “Is that coming? And if it's coming, it looks like a really big deal.” And roughly every 30 years, I'd say, we've seen these bursts of interest in AI and public concern, like media articles, you know…We had the ‘60s. Now we have the ‘90s…The ‘60s, ‘90s, and now again, 2020. Every 30 years, a burst of interest and concern about something that's not crazy. Like, it might well happen. And if it was going to happen, then the kind of precursor you might expect to see is investors realizing it's about to happen and bidding up assets that were going to be important for that to really high levels. And that's what you did see around ‘99. A lot of people thought, “Well, this might be it.”Right. The market test for the singularity seemed to be passing.A test that is not actually being passed quite so much at the moment.Right.So, in some sense, you had a better story then in terms of, look, the investors seem to believe in this.You could also look at harder economic numbers, productivity numbers, and so on.Right. And we've had a steady increase in automation over, you know, centuries. But people keep wondering, “We're about to have a new kind of automation. And if we are, will we see that in new kinds of demos or new kinds of jobs?” And people have been looking out for these signs of, “Are we about to enter a new era?” And that's been the big issue. It's like, “Will this time be different?” And so, I've got to say this time, at the moment, doesn't look different. But eventually, there will be a “this time” that'll be different. And then it'll be really different. So it's not crazy to be watching out for this and maybe taking some chances betting on it.The signs of an approaching accelerationIf we were approaching a kind of acceleration, a leap forward, what would be the signs? Would it just be kind of what we saw in the ‘90s?So the scenario is, within a 15-year period, maybe a five-year period, we go from a current 4 percent growth rate, doubling every 15 years, to maybe doubling every month. A crazy-high doubling rate. And that would have to be on the basis of some new technology, and therefore, investment. So you'd have to see a new promising technology that a lot of people think could potentially be big. And then a lot of investment going into that, a lot of investors saying, “Yeah, there's a pretty big chance this will be it.” And not just financial investors. You would expect to see people — like college students deciding to major in that, people moving to wherever it is. That would be the big sign: investment moving toward anything. And the key thing is, you would see actual big, fast productivity increases. There'd be some companies in cities who were just booming. You were talking about stagnation recently: The ‘60s were faster than now, but that's within a factor of two. Well, we're talking about a factor of 60 to 200.So we don't need to spend a lot of time on the data measurement issues. Like, “Is productivity up 1.7 percent, 2.1?”If you're a greedy investor and you want to be really in on this early so you buy it cheap before everybody else, then you've got to be looking at those early indicators. But if you're like the rest of us wondering, “Do I change my job? Do I change my career?” then you might as well wait and wait till you see something really big. So even at the moment, we've got a lot of exciting demos: DALL-E, GPT-3, things like that. But if you ask for commercial impact and ask them, “How much money are people making?” they shrug their shoulders and they say “Soon, maybe.” But that's what I would be looking for in those things. When people are generating a lot of revenue — so it's a lot of customers making a lot of money — then that's the sort of thing to maybe consider.Something I've written about, probably too often, is the Long Bets website. And two economists, Robert Gordon and Erik Brynjolfsson, have made a long bet. Gordon takes the role of techno-pessimist, Brynjolfsson techno-optimist. Let me just briefly read the bet in case you don't happen to have it memorized: “Private Nonfarm business productivity growth will average over 1.8 percent per year from the first quarter of 2020 to the last quarter of 2029.” Now, if it does that, that's an acceleration. Brynjolfsson says yes. Gordon says no…But you want to pick a bigger cutoff. Productivity growth in the last decade is maybe half that, right? So they're looking at a doubling. And a doubling is news, right? But, honestly, a doubling is within the usual fluctuation. If you look over, say, the last 200 years, and we say sometimes some cities grow faster, some industries grow faster. You know, we have this steady growth rate, but it contains fluctuations. I think the key thing, as always, when you're looking for a regime change, is you're looking at — there's an average and a fluctuation — when is a new fluctuation out of the range of the previous ones? And that's when I would start to really pay attention, when it's not just the typical magnitude. So honestly, that's within the range of the typical magnitudes you might expect if we just had an unusually productive new technology, even if we stay in the same mode for another century.When you look at the enthusiasm we had at the turn of this century, do you think we did the things that would encourage rapid growth? Did we create a better ecosystem of growth over the past 20 years or a worse one?I don't think the past 20 years have been especially a deviation. But I think slowly since around 1970, we have seen a decline in our support for innovation. I think increasing regulations, increasing size of organizations in response to regulation, and just a lot of barriers. And even more disturbingly, I think it's worth noting, we've seen a convergence of regulation around the world. If there were 150 countries, each of which had different independent regulatory regimes, I would be less concerned. Because if one nation messes it up and doesn't allow things, some other nation might pick up the slack. But we've actually seen pretty strong convergence, even in this global pandemic. So, for example, challenge trials were an idea early voiced, but no nation allowed them. Anywhere. And even now, hardly they've been tried. And if you look at nuclear energy, electric magnetic spectrum, organ sales, medical experimentation — just look at a lot of different regulatory areas, even airplanes — you just see an enormous convergence worldwide. And that's a problem because it means we're blocking innovation the same everywhere. And so there's just no place to go to try something new.Global governance and risk aversionThere's always concern in Europe about their own productivity, about their technological growth. And they're always putting out white papers in Europe about what [they] can do. And I remember reading that somebody decided that Europe's comparative advantage was in regulation. Like that was Europe's superpower: regulation.Yeah, sure.And speaking of convergence, a lot of people who want to regulate the tech industry here have been looking to what Europe is doing. But Europe has not shown a lot of tech progress. They don't generate the big technology companies. So that, to me, is unsettling. Not only are we converging, but we're converging sometimes toward the least productive areas of the advanced world.In a lot of people's minds, the key thing is the unsafe dangers that tech might provide. And they look to Europe and they say, “Look how they're providing security there. Look at all the protections they're offering against the various kinds of insecurity we could have. Surely, we want to copy them for that.”I don't want to copy them for that. I'm willing to take a few risks.But many people want that level of security. So I'm actually concerned about this over the coming centuries. I think this trend is actually a trend toward not just stronger global governance, but stronger global community or even mobs, if we call it that. That is the reason why nuclear energy is regulated the same everywhere: the regulators in each place are part of a world community, and they each want to be respected in that community. And in order to be respected, they need to conform to what the rest of the community thinks. And that's going to just keep happening more over the coming centuries, I fear.One of my favorite shows, more realistic science-fiction shows and book series, is The Expanse, which takes place a couple hundred years in the future where there's a global government — which seems to be a democratic global government. I'm not sure how efficient it is. I'm not sure how entrepreneurial it is. Certainly the evidence seems to be that global governance does not lead to a vibrant, trial-and-error, experimenting kind of ecology. But just the opposite: one that focuses on safety and caution and risk aversion.And it's going to get a lot worse. I have a book called The Age of Em: Work, Love, and Life when Robots Rule the Earth, and it's about very radical changes in technology. And most people who read about that, they go, “Oh, that's terrible. We need more regulations to stop that.” I think if you just look toward the longer run of changes, most people, when they start to imagine the large changes that will be possible, they want to stop that and put limits and control it somehow. And that's going to give even more of an impetus to global governance. That is, once you realize how our children might become radically different from us, then that scares people. And they really, then, want global governance to limit that.I fear this is going to be the biggest choice humanity ever makes, which is, in the next few centuries we will probably have stronger global governance, stronger global community, and we will credit it for solving many problems, including war and global warming and inequality and things like that. We will like the sense that we've all come together and we get to decide what changes are allowed and what aren't. And we limit how strange our children can be. And even though we will have given up on some things, we will just enjoy … because that's a very ancient human sense, to want to be part of a community and decide together. And then a few centuries from now, there will come this day when it's possible for a colony ship to leave the solar system to go elsewhere. And we will know by then that if we allow that to happen, that's the end of the era of shared governance. From that point on, competition reaffirms itself, war reaffirms itself. The descendants who come out there will then compete with each other and come back here and impose their will here, probably. And that scares the hell out of people.Indeed, that's the point of [The Expanse]. It's kind of a mixed bag with how successful Earth's been. They didn't kill themselves in nuclear war, at least. But the geopolitics just continues and that doesn't change. We're still human beings, even if we happen to be living on Mars or Europa. All that conflict will just reemerge.Although, I think it gets the scale wrong there. I think as long as we stay in the solar system, a central government will be able to impose its rule on outlying colonies. The solar system is pretty transparent. Anywhere in the solar system you are, if you're doing something somebody doesn't like, they can see you and they can throw something at you and hit you. And so I think a central government will be feasible within the solar system for quite some time. But once you get to other star systems, that ends. It's not feasible to punish colonies 20 light-years away when you don't get the message of what they did [until] 20 years later. That just becomes infeasible then. I would think The Expanse is telling a more human story because it's happening within this solar system. But I think, in fact, this world government becomes a solar system government, and it allows expansion to the solar system on its terms. But it would then be even stronger as a centralized governance community which prevents change.Thinking about the future like an economistIn a recent blog post, you wrote that when you think about the future, you try to think about it as an economist. You use economic analysis “to predict the social consequences of a particular envisioned future technology.” Have futurists not done that? Futurism has changed. I've written a lot about the classic 1960s futurists who were these very big, imaginative thinkers. They tended to be pretty optimistic. And then they tended to get pessimistic. And then futurism became kind of like marketing, like these were brand awareness people, not really big thinkers. When they approached it, did they approach it as technologists? Did they approach it as sociologists? Are economists just not interested in this subject?Good question. So I'd say there are three standard kinds of futurists. One kind of futurist is a short-term marketing consultant who's basically telling you which way the colors will go or the market demand will go in the short term.Is neon green in or lime green in, or something.And that's economically valuable. Those people should definitely exist. Then there's a more aspirational, inspirational kind of futurist. And that's changed over the decades, depending on what people want to be inspired by or afraid of. In the ‘50s, ‘60s, it might be about America going out and becoming powerful. Or later it's about the environment, and then it's about inequality and gender relations. In some sense, science fiction is another kind of futurism. And these two tend to be related in the sense that science fiction mainly focuses on an indirect way to tell metaphorical stories about us. Because we're not so interested in the future, really, we're interested in us. Those are futures serving various kinds of communities, but neither of them are that realistically oriented. They're not focused on what's likely to actually happen. They're focused on what will inspire people or entertain people or make people afraid or tell a morality tale.But if you're interested in what's actually going to happen, then my claim is you want to just take our standard best theories and just straightforwardly apply them in a thoughtful way. So many people, when they talk about the future, they say, “It's just impossible to say anything about the future. No one could possibly know; therefore, science fiction speculations are the best we can possibly do. You might as well go with that.” And I think that's just wrong. My demonstration in The Age of Em is to say, if you take a very specific technology scenario, you can just turn the crank with Econ 101, Sociology 101, Electrical Engineering 101, all the standard things, and just apply it to that scenario. And you can just say a lot. But what you will find out is that it's weird. It's not very inspiring, and it doesn't tell the perfect horror story of what you should avoid. It's just a complicated mess. And that's what you should expect, because that's what we would seem to our ancestors. [For] somebody 200 or 2000 years ago, our world doesn't make a good morality tale for them. First of all, they would just have trouble getting their head around it. Why did that happen? And [what] does that even mean? And then they're not so sure what to like or dislike about it, because it's just too weird. If you're trying to tell a nice morality tale [you have] simple heroes and villains, right? And this is too messy. The real futures you should just predict are going to be too messy to be a simple morality tale. They're going to be weird, and that's going to make them hard to deal with.The stories we tell ourselves about the futureDo you think it matters, the kinds of stories we tell ourselves about what the future could hold? My bias is, I think it does. I think it matters if all we paint for people is a really gloomy one, then not only is it depressing, then it's like, “What are we even doing here?” Because if we're going to move forward, if we're going to take risks with technology, there needs to be some sort of payoff. But yet, it seems like a lot of the culture continues. We mentioned The Expanse, which by the modern standard of a lot of science fiction, I find to be pretty optimistic. Some people say, "Well, it's not optimistic because half the population is on a basic income and there's war.” But, hey, there are people. Global warming didn't kill everybody. Nuclear war didn't kill everybody. We continued. We advanced. Not perfect, but society seems to be progressing. Has that mattered, do you think, the fact that we've been telling ourselves such terrible stories about the future? We used to tell much better ones.The first-order theory about change is that change doesn't really happen because people anticipated or planned for it or voted on it. Mostly this world has been changing as a side effect of lots of local economic interests and technological interests and pursuits. The world is just on this train with nobody driving, and that's scary and should be scary, I guess. So to the first order, it doesn't really matter what stories we tell or how we think about the future, because we haven't actually been planning for the future. We haven't actually been choosing the future.It kind of happens while we're doing something else.The side effect of other things. But that's the first order, that's the zeroth-order effect. The next-order effect might be … look, places in the world will vary in to what extent they win or lose over the long run. And there are things that can radically influence that. So being too cautious and playing it safe too much and being comfortable, predictably, will probably lead you to not win the future. If you're interested in having us — whoever us is — win the future or have a bright, dynamic future, then you'd like “us” to be a little more ambitious about such things. I would think it is a complement: The more we are excited about the future, and the future requires changes, the more we are telling ourselves, “Well, yeah, this change is painful, but that's the kind of thing you have to do if you want to get where we're going.”Long-term thinking and innovationIf you've been reading the New York Times lately or the New Yorker, the average is related to something called “effective altruism,” is the idea that there are big, existential problems facing the world, and we should be thinking a lot harder about them because people in the future matter too, not just us. And we should be spending money on these problems. We should be doing more research on these problems. What do you think about this movement? It sounds logical.Well, if you just compare it to all the other movements out there and their priorities, I've got to give this one credit. Obviously, the future is important.They are thinking directly about it. And they have ideas.They are trying to be conscious about that and proactive and altruistic about that. And that's certainly great compared to the vast majority of other activity. Now, I have some complaints, but overall, I'm happy to praise this sort of thing. The risk is, as with most futurism, that even though we're not conscious of it, what we're really doing is sort of projecting our issues now into the future and sort of arguing about future stuff by talking about our stuff. So you might say people seem to be really concerned about the future of global warming in two centuries, but all the other stuff that might happen in two centuries, they're not at all interested. It's like, what's the difference there? They might say global warming lets them tell this anti-materialist story that they'd want to tell anyway, tell why it's bad to be materialist and so to cut back on material stuff is good. And it's sort of a pro-environment story. I fear that that's also happening to some degree in effective altruism. But that's just what you should expect for humans in general. Effective altruists, in terms of their focus on the future, are overwhelmingly focused as far as I can tell on artificial intelligence risk. And I think that's a bit misdirected. In a big world I don't mind it …My concern is that we'll be super cautious and before we have developed anything that could really create existential risk … we will never get to the point where it's so powerful because, like the Luddites, we'll have quashed it early on out of fear.A friend of mine is Eric Drexler, who years ago was known as talking about nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is still a technology in the future. And he experienced something that made him a little unsure whether he should have said all these things, he said, which is that once you can describe a vivid future, the first thing everybody focuses on is almost all the things that can go wrong. Then they set up policy to try to focus on preventing the things that can go wrong. That's where the whole conversation goes. And then people are distancing themselves from it. He found that many people distanced themselves from nanotechnology until they could take over the word, because in their minds it reflected these terrible risks. So people wanted to not even talk about that. But you could ask, if he had just inspired people to make the technology but not talked about the larger policy risks, maybe that would be better? It might be in fact true that the world today is broken so much that if ordinary people and policymakers don't know about a future risk, the world's better off, because at least they won't mess it up by trying to limit it and control it too early and too crudely.Then the challenge is, maybe you want the technologists who might make it to hear about it and get inspired, but you don't want everybody else to be inspired to control it and correct it and channel it and prepare for it. Because honestly, that seems to go pretty bad. I guess the question is, what technology that people did see well ahead of time, did they not come up with terrible scenarios to worry about? For example, television: People didn't think about television very much ahead of time. And when it came, a lot of people watched it. And a lot of people complained about that. But if you could imagine ahead of time that in 20 years people are going to spend five hours a day watching this thing. If that's an accurate prediction, people would've freaked out.Or cars: As you may know, in the late 1800s, people just did not envision the future of cars. When they envisioned the future of transportation, they saw dirigibles and trains and submarines, even, but not cars. Because cars were these individual things. And if they had envisioned the actual future of cars — automobile accidents, individual people controlling a thing going down the street at 80 miles an hour — they might have thought, “That's terrible. We can't allow that.” And you have to wonder… It was only in the United States, really, that cars took off. There's a sense in which the world had rapid technological progress around 1900 or so because the US was an exception worldwide. A lot of technologies were only really tried in the US, like even radio, and then the rest of the world copied and followed because the US had so much success with them.I think if you want to pick a point where that optimistic ‘90s came to an end, it might have been, speaking of Wired magazine, the Bill Joy article … “Why the Future Doesn't Need Us.” Talking about nanotech and gray goo… Since you brought up nanotech and Eric Drexler, do you know what the state of that technology is? We had this nanotechnology initiative, but I don't think it was working on that kind of nanotech.No, it wasn't.It was more like a materials science. But as far as creating these replicating tiny machines…The federal government had a nanotechnology initiative, where they basically took all the stuff they were doing that was dealing with small stuff and they relabeled it. They didn't really add more money. They just put it under a new initiative. And then they made sure nobody was doing anything like this sort of dangerous stuff that could cause what Eric was talking about.Stuff you'd put in sunscreen…Exactly. So there was still never much funding there. There's a sense in which, in many kinds of technology areas, somebody can envision ahead of time a new technology that was possible if a concentrated effort goes into a certain area in a certain way. And they're trying to inspire that. But absent that focused effort, you might not see it for a long time. That would be the simplest story about nanotech: We haven't seen the focused effort and resources that he had proposed. Now, that doesn't mean had we had those efforts he would've succeeded. He could just be wrong about what was feasible and how soon. But nevertheless, that still seemed to be an exciting, promising technology that would've been worth the investment to try. And still is, I would say.One concern I have about the notion of longtermism, is that it seems to place a lot of emphasis on our ability to rally people, get them thinking long term, taking preparatory steps. And we've just gone through a pandemic which showed that we don't do that very well. And the way we dealt with it was not through preparation, but by being a rich, technologically advanced society that could come up with a vaccine. That's my kind of longtermism, in a way: being rich and technologically capable so you can react to the unexpected.And that's because we allowed an exception in how vaccines were developed in that case. Had we gone with the usual way vaccines had been developed before, it would've taken a lot longer. So the problem is that when we make too many structures that restrain things, then we aren't able to quickly react to new circumstances. You probably know that most companies, they might have a forecasting department, but they don't fund it very much. They don't actually care that much. Almost everything they do is reactive in most organizations. That's just the fact of how most organizations work. Because, in fact, it is hard to prepare. It's hard to anticipate things.I'm not saying we shouldn't try to figure out ways to deflect asteroids. We should. To have this notion of longtermism over a broad scope of issues … that's fine. But I hope we don't forget the other part, which is making sure that we do the right things to create those innovative ecosystems where we do increase wealth, we do increase our technological capabilities to not be totally dependent on our best guesses right now.Here's a scary example of how this thinking can go wrong, in my mind. In the longtermism community, there's this serious proposal that many people like, which is called the Long Reflection.The Long Reflection, which is, we've solved all the problems and then we take a time out.We stop allowing change for a while. And for a good long time, maybe a thousand years or even longer, we're in this period where no change substantially happens. Then we talk a lot about what we could do to deal with things when things are allowed to change again. And we work it all out, and then we turn it back on and allow change. That's giving a lot of credit to this system of talking.Who's talking? Are these post-humans talking? Or is it people like us?It would be before the change, remember. So it would be people like us. I actually think this is this ancient human intuition from the forger world, before the farming era, where in the small band the way we made most important decisions was to sit down around the campfire and discuss it and then decide together and then do something. And that's, in some sense, how everybody wants to make all the big decisions. That's why they like a world government and a world community, because it goes back to that. But I honestly think we have to admit that just doesn't go very well lately. We're not actually very capable of having a discussion together and feeling all the options and making choices and then deciding together to do it. That's how we want to be able to work. And that's how we maybe should, but it's not how we are. I feel, with the Long Reflection, once we institutionalize a world where change isn't allowed, we would get pretty used to that world.It seems very comfortable, and we'd start voting for security.And then we wouldn't really allow the Great Reflection to end, because that would be this risky, into the strange world. We would like the stable world we were in. And that would be the end of that.I should say that I very much like Toby Ord's book, The Precipice. He's also one of my all-time favorite guests. He's really been a fantastic guest. Though, the Long Reflection, I do have concerns about.Come back next Thursday for part two of my conversation with Robin Hanson. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

先日、Amazonの倉庫で労働組合結成の賛否を問う投票が行われ、ニューヨーク州スタテン島で実施された投票では、勤務する労働者のうち55％の賛成を獲得し、組合結成への道を開きました。米国のAmazonでは初となる労働組合が誕生することは、労働運動の大きな勝利といえる出来事として注目されています。その影響か、スターバックス、REI、アップル、アマゾンなどの大手企業の小売店の従業員が労働組合を結成する試みが進んでいます。 ※本エピソードを記事化したものはこちらから※ ▽トーク概要 労働組合が増えている背景／雇用の形はどうなるのか／エッセンシャルワーカーによる大退職／日本とアメリカの雇用の違い／企業経営に対する世間の厳しい目線／企業の存在意義は利益から目的が重要に／SDGsや、ESG投資とは／アメリカで主流のB Corp認定とは／ESG的思考は小児教育から身に着けるように／ロースキルジョブの待遇改善のためにできること／中間管理職は今後どうなるのか 【出演者】 石角友愛 / 長谷川貴久 / 山崎壯 【今週のホットニュース】 「アマゾン初の労組　なぜ若者は結成を決意したのか」 冨山和彦氏との日経xTREND対談　 前編はこちら　／　後編はこちら 【今回の放送で登場したキーワード】 SDGs（Sustainable Development Goals）…日本語では「持続可能な開発目標」と訳される。17のゴール・169のターゲットから構成され、2030年までに持続可能でよりよい世界を目指すための国際目標 ESG投資…従来の財務情報だけでなく、環境（Environment）・社会（Social）・ガバナンス（Governance）要素も考慮した投資のこと B Corporation認定 … 「Benefit Corporation」の略でB Corp（ビーコープ）と訳される。ビジネスの成功を再定義し、よりインクルーシブでサステナブルな経済を構築するために考案された「良い企業」を審査する認証システム 【今週のおすすめコンテンツ】 「ノマドランド」 リーマンショックのあおりを受けて、長年住んでいた家を失ってしまった60代女性が主人公の物語。キャンピングカーでアメリカ各地で季節労働をこなしながら旅をするノマド (遊牧民)生活をしていき、作中では倉庫の日雇い労働もしており、描写が忠実に描かれている。 アメリカの最新AI＆IT情報をお届けする毎週水曜日配信の無料ニュースレター登録はこちら https://www.paloaltoinsight.com/ その他、ご質問や感想、取り上げて欲しいテーマなどあればお気軽にご連絡ください。 メール：info@paloaltoinsight.com 石角友愛のTwitter：（DM解放しています）@tomoechama　 リプライやDMに気軽にご連絡ください。 パロアルトインサイトHP : www.paloaltoinsight.com 楽曲提供： Atsu (beatmaker and rapper from Zenarchy) https://twitter.com/atsu_izm 「Transform」Level5テーマソング https://m.soundcloud.com/atsuizm/transform --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/level5/message

「微信」或者「微博」搜索关注［早安英文］，查看更多有趣实用的中英双语节目。笔记：morning call 叫醒服务I want a morning call tomorrow. 明天早上我需要唤醒服务。Would you like a morning call? 您要叫醒服务吗？artificial intelligence=AI 人工智能It was the first commercially available machine to employ artificial intelligence. 这是第一台具有商业价值的人工智能机器。It's the most powerful branch of artificial intelligence. 它是人工智能领域最强大的分支。long-winded 啰唆的；唠唠叨叨的The manifesto is long-winded, repetitious and often ambiguous or poorly drafted. 这篇宣言长篇大论，内容重复，词句常常含混不清或不知所云。I hope I'm not being too long-winded. 我希望我不是太啰嗦。获取节目完整音频、笔记和片尾的歌曲名，请关注威信公众号「早安英文」，回复「加油」即可。更多有意思的英语干货等着你！

「微信」或者「微博」搜索关注［早安英文］，查看更多有趣实用的中英双语节目。笔记：morning call 叫醒服务I want a morning call tomorrow. 明天早上我需要唤醒服务。Would you like a morning call? 您要叫醒服务吗？artificial intelligence=AI 人工智能It was the first commercially available machine to employ artificial intelligence. 这是第一台具有商业价值的人工智能机器。It's the most powerful branch of artificial intelligence. 它是人工智能领域最强大的分支。long-winded 啰唆的；唠唠叨叨的The manifesto is long-winded, repetitious and often ambiguous or poorly drafted. 这篇宣言长篇大论，内容重复，词句常常含混不清或不知所云。I hope I'm not being too long-winded. 我希望我不是太啰嗦。获取节目完整音频、笔记和片尾的歌曲名，请关注威信公众号「早安英文」，回复「加油」即可。更多有意思的英语干货等着你！

「微信」或者「微博」搜索关注［早安英文］，查看更多有趣实用的中英双语节目。笔记：morning call 叫醒服务I want a morning call tomorrow. 明天早上我需要唤醒服务。Would you like a morning call? 您要叫醒服务吗？artificial intelligence=AI 人工智能It was the first commercially available machine to employ artificial intelligence. 这是第一台具有商业价值的人工智能机器。It's the most powerful branch of artificial intelligence. 它是人工智能领域最强大的分支。long-winded 啰唆的；唠唠叨叨的The manifesto is long-winded, repetitious and often ambiguous or poorly drafted. 这篇宣言长篇大论，内容重复，词句常常含混不清或不知所云。I hope I'm not being too long-winded. 我希望我不是太啰嗦。获取节目完整音频、笔记和片尾的歌曲名，请关注威信公众号「早安英文」，回复「加油」即可。更多有意思的英语干货等着你！

8 seconds of silence the wave Joey Chestnut Eating 1 hot dog takes 35 minutes off life, study suggests https://nypost.com/2021/08/23/eating-1-hot-dog-takes-35-minutes-off-life-study-suggests/ Taco Bell Innovates the Shit Your Pants Experience https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/taco-bell-to-futuristic-digital-restaurant-design-taco-bell-defy-in-summer-2022-153224022.html Dude, sex toys are actually how old??? https://allthatsinteresting.com/history-of-sex-toys Just in time for Greg's cravings, Pumpkin Spice Ramen!!! https://www.foodandwine.com/news/pumpkin-spice-ramen-cup-noodles World's Fastest-Accelerating Roller Coaster Closes After Breaking Riders' Bones https://www.newsweek.com/worlds-fastest-accelerating-roller-coaster-closes-after-breaking-riders-bones-1622266 ELONS ENLIGHTENING Elon Musk unveils Tesla Bot, a humanoid robot that uses vehicle AI "It's intended to be friendly," the carmaker's CEO joked. https://www.cnet.com/news/elon-musk-unveils-tesla-bot-a-humanoid-robot-utilizing-vehicle-ai/ Elon Musk: “Americans should not give up their liberties too easily …We should be concerned on anything that is a massive infringement on our civil liberties” https://techstartups.com/2020/08/10/elon-musk-americans-not-give-liberties-easily-concerned-anything-massive-infringement-civil-liberties/

AIじゃなくてITだ。 今日の攻略 ・弦を変える ・オンラインサロンの動画出す ・エヴァを畳む ➤塾長フミ子グッズショップ https://suzuri.jp/fumiko_violin ➤YouTube【塾長フミ子】 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwenF3_8dBKcCVU51ZfHpJw ➤Twitter【フミ子(バイオリン)】 https://twitter.com/fumiko_violin ➤JUGENアルバム『JUGEN_1』 https://edward27.thebase.in/ ➤JUGENサロン【月額1200円】 https://camp-fire.jp/profile/JUGEN ➤Amazonフミ子ほしいものリスト https://www.amazon.jp/hz/wishlist/ls/R588UCS62FQ?ref_=wl_share #絶対共感してもらえないこと

It's what made Marty McFly the envy of all kids in the 80s - and one of the most iconic sci-fi gadgets ever: the hoverboard. Sam Rogers always wanted to fly on such a board, too. In this episode of From KNOW-HOW to WOW, Sam shares how he made his dream come true. But while he wore a jet suit when "hoverboarding," experts at Bosch are now making hovering platforms levitate with the help of AI: "It is not more than controlling all six degrees of freedom," says Bosch expert Joachim Frangen. The intelligent combination of human knowledge and AI capabilities enables new products like Planatix. That's what Joachim calls his invention. But: since machines have learned to think for themselves, AI research must ensure that humans remain in control. That's why Melena and Geoff also talk to Zico Kolter, chief scientist of AI research at the Bosch center for artificial intelligence. He explains why Bosch AI is safe, robust and explainable. SHOWNOTES: How to Hoverboard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shazS0gzVXg Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence: https://www.bosch-ai.com/ Interested in working for Bosch? Click here: https://www.bosch.com/careers/

This week: Red eyes are evil, brother and sister combos are dangerous to 3D chess, can Saturday morning cartoons make your Dot a baby's daddy? How did airlocks get to suck so fast? Somebody starts talking about Star Trek III. And we don't write any of our scripts - Especially not this opening tease. -Brought to you by Section 31- Nathan Adams Heather Ferris Rocky Robinson Patrick Hall 00:00 Opening Tease - the only part actually written 01:06 Alien scrambled eggs may multiply, have baby eggs, and hang out with Tribbles 01:30 Tribbles and Eggs 02:00 Throw those eggs and tribbles out the airlock! 02:30 I do not like green tribbles and ham. 03:15 The Captain likes...balls. 03:55 Who writes your script? Na it's just BS. 04:45 Trek panels on Comicon at Home 05:15 Star Trek: Picard Emmy push 05:40 She wasn't wearing a uniform 06:00 Also, she's special! 06:30 (the short yellow shuttle) 06:45 James McAvoy on YouTube "Star Force" Star Trek Parodies 07:30 Darmok and Memes 08:15 GIF or Jiff 09:14 Short Treks: Ephraim and Dot 09:30 Saturday Morning Cartoons! 10:00 It had more Easter Eggs than the Holiday 11:00 Started like an old educational film 11:30 Totally Looney! And the music! 12:00 Dot became a surrogate father - Shit! 12:30 Ring ring! 13:00 Good vibrations - Call me ;-) 13:30 Scary and Adorable 14:00 There's no fire in space! 14:15 Star Trek III - not a bad film 14:30 Christopher Lloyd was Klingon 14:45 Fred's Tribbles 15:00 I have had enough of you!!! 15:15 Kirstie Alley vs Robin Curtis as Saavik 15:45 - I can't believe we didn't talk about that Pon Farr moment - Actual Vulcan sexy time, and we SAID NOTHING!!! 16:00 The name of that Klingon 16:45 Project Daedalus 17:30 Airiam was doggin' them! 17:45 Tilly was following orders 18:00 Airiam's crew relationships - She's so fucking cool! 19:14 I'm not a robot! 19:30 Good security - Karen the right way! 20:25 Lie Detecting a Vulcan - Good luck with that! 21:00 Deep Fake!!! It's how we got Holograms? 21:40 Bro/Sis fights - Some of that hurt my feelings!! 22:15 Driving your brother crazy 23:20 Girl was downloading, but not the angry butt plug with tentacles 24:15 She got spaced 24:45 Janet Jackson was HAL? 25:30 You're the best! 26:00 They all got the co-ordinates at the same time? 27:30 AI: It always comes down to the Red Eyes - RUN! 28:30 Can you hear the beat? 29:19 Burnham's Savior Complex 29:45 Spock's right - Burnham had to even go back in time to save everyone! 30:30 Talking to your equipment 31:00 Spock's many talents - We take everything to the bedroom 31:30 Culber and Stamets 32:30 Looking forward to that come-back-to-life make-up sex 33:12 The Airlock - solves all your problems 35:00 Kinky Scientists made the Airlock a quicker suck 35:30 Aren't you dead yet? 36:00 It's not the cold that gets you... 36:30 Hold your breath? 37:00 None of this sounds sexy at all. 38:00 The ending of this episode 39:00 The shock of the moment. 39:00 Wrong side of the door, and you can't do anything, but watch. 40:00 Star Wars? 40:30 Helplessness 41:00 Coming Home 41:30 Floating Frozen Blood 42:00 Let the Bodies Hit the Floor!!!!!!!!! 43:00 Isn't that at-mo cold? 43:50 SIRI turns into HAL - the evils of AI 44:30 I didn't want that brand! Dammit AI!!! 45:00 No shorts? Perhaps a robe? 45:30 Oh - you mean the Star Trek Shorts! 45:50 Star Trek Homework: Children of Mars and The Red Angel 46:45 What the Jawa said. 47:30 A Butt Plug (with Tentacles) walks down the hallway Thanks for listening! Send comments! Email: thecollective@starfleetunderground.com Website: starfleetunderground.com Twitter: twitter.com/StarfleetUnderG Instagram: instagram.com/starfleetunderground Facebook: facebook.com/starfleetunderground YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/Qtsy16

Can you really figure out the markets by using ‘Big Data’ and ‘AI’? IT'S TRUE

放送後記 第十八回です！ 「「「「「や、焼肉だ〜〜〜〜〜〜！！！！」」」」」 そんなこんなで当番組では皆様からのメールお待ちしております。(下記にGoogle Formを用意しています。) もしくはTwitterで #350can で感想ツイートもお待ちしております。 ではまた次回〜！ SHOW NOTE 7:00 “まるで実写”の3D女子高生「Saya」、声を得て女子高の授業に登場　会話を通して「AIとは何か」教える - IT media 16:55 100 YEARS TRAIN｜相鉄都心直通記念ムービー 25:19 『新語・流行語大賞』2019“年間大賞”「ONE TEAM」に決定 TOP10は「タピる」「闇営業」「令和」など選出 - ORICON NEWS 30:47 ナゾトキ街歩きゲーム「地下謎への招待状2019」 今回のビール @hase 今週の1缶は、Indeed Companyのピーチバム。原料に桃が入ったフルーティなIPAで、甘すぎずバランスがとれてて◎です！ #350can pic.twitter.com/AGcNCcdhpi— はせがわりゅうや (@hase_csv) December 3, 2019 @taiga 黄桜のLUCKYシリーズから今回は「LUCKY CHIKEN」どう見てもから◯げくん。苦味が強い。食事中とかの方が良いかも。 #350can pic.twitter.com/FcpT8hITbM— Λyato (@dot_not_) December 3, 2019 メール投稿 読み込んでいます… BGM ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Go With Me Music By Johan Lilja (DJ Quads) Soundcloud │ @aka-dj-quads Twitter │ twitter.com/DjQuads Instagram │ www.instagram.com/djquads Spotify │ spoti.fi/2tpqG3D YT Channel │ www.youtube.com/DjQuadsOfficial Source │ youtu.be/-1kwZAEytEs ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ The Fool Music By BryZone_ybp Soundcloud │ @bryzone_ybp ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ SE 魔王魂

放送後記 第十八回です！ 「「「「「や、焼肉だ〜〜〜〜〜〜！！！！」」」」」 そんなこんなで当番組では皆様からのメールお待ちしております。(下記にGoogle Formを用意しています。) もしくはTwitterで #350can で感想ツイートもお待ちしております。 ではまた次回〜！ SHOW NOTE 7:00 “まるで実写”の3D女子高生「Saya」、声を得て女子高の授業に登場　会話を通して「AIとは何か」教える - IT media 16:55 100 YEARS TRAIN｜相鉄都心直通記念ムービー 25:19 『新語・流行語大賞』2019“年間大賞”「ONE TEAM」に決定 TOP10は「タピる」「闇営業」「令和」など選出 - ORICON NEWS 30:47 ナゾトキ街歩きゲーム「地下謎への招待状2019」 今回のビール @hase 今週の1缶は、Indeed Companyのピーチバム。原料に桃が入ったフルーティなIPAで、甘すぎずバランスがとれてて◎です！ #350can pic.twitter.com/AGcNCcdhpi— はせがわりゅうや (@hase_csv) December 3, 2019 @taiga 黄桜のLUCKYシリーズから今回は「LUCKY CHIKEN」どう見てもから◯げくん。苦味が強い。食事中とかの方が良いかも。 #350can pic.twitter.com/FcpT8hITbM— Λyato (@dot_not_) December 3, 2019 メール投稿 読み込んでいます… BGM ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Go With Me Music By Johan Lilja (DJ Quads) Soundcloud │ @aka-dj-quads Twitter │ twitter.com/DjQuads Instagram │ www.instagram.com/djquads Spotify │ spoti.fi/2tpqG3D YT Channel │ www.youtube.com/DjQuadsOfficial Source │ youtu.be/-1kwZAEytEs ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ The Fool Music By BryZone_ybp Soundcloud │ @bryzone_ybp ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ SE 魔王魂

Technology. AI. Software. Vendors. Providers. Research. Adoption. Implementation. Customer Experiences. Expectations. Investment. Resources. BLEH! From fear of the unknown to tech overload to widespread confusion – or worse, stagnation – there’s a myriad of reasons marketers put off acquiring new technology. New tech adoption is far from easy or enjoyable – most marketers who have been through it would concur… and for good reason. How are marketing teams supposed to sort through the weeds to distinguish pretenders from contenders? And, if it’s AI you want, how do you distinguish from those who say they have AI vs. those who have real AI? It seems like the hype, promises, and expectations have made a lot of marketers gun-shy, untrusting, and disgruntled in the wake of slippery software vendors who enticed them with bold claims and deceitful ploys and then sold them a supposed silver bullet that ultimately under-delivered. Alex Timlin  joins the program to share his insights on how For all the reasons decision makers put off choosing new tech, the alternative is even worse. Do nothing and lag behind. Like it or not, marketing is changing, and without a constant eye on technological improvement, the job of the marketer is only going to get harder. It’s only by bringing tech adoption challenges into our  awareness that we can begin to remedy issues that prevent us from carrying innovation forward.

This week Tao, Tyler, and Gunnar chat about AI and some of the implications. The monkeys contemplate where technology will take people and what exactly AI is before looking at some of the problems. What happens if AI can change itself and rewrite its own code? Will AI inevitably outcompete humanity? Will AI view people as a problem to solve and actively remove them; or merely cause their obsolescence? Are we doomed to a world of being pampered and coddled by AI? It seems as though we are at an important point in time in history where we are potentially summoning our replacements. What are your thoughts?

David “Gonzo” Gonzalez is the CEO and Co-founder of Ziff.ai, a deep learning as a service platform. Ziff’s goal: Reduce the complexity required to profit from AI in an enterprise setting.In this episode, Gonzo and Ledge discuss how to answer the question, “How do I know as a business person if my business model can be enhanced as an AI?”It comes down to prediction, forecasting, and two areas where the profits really lie: automation, and augmentation. In other words, find opportunities to help the “humans in the loop” be faster and more accurate, and you’ll win. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

欢迎收听丽莎老师讲机器人，想要孩子参加机器人竞赛、创意编程、创客竞赛的辅导，找丽莎老师！欢迎添加微信号：153 5359 2068，或搜索微信公众号：我最爱机器人。丽莎老师讲机器人之2019年最值得关注的八大AI趋势。AI所带来的优势及其深远的影响，仅从中美之间新生的AI竞争就能看出，未来，人工智能将重塑从工作性质到日常沟通再到运输方式的一切一切，它所释放的“创造性破坏”将使大量现有技能和工作状态革新，开辟一个新智能时代。接下来，让我们来看看2019年的几个AI趋势。AI芯片AI的发展，是需要依赖于CPU/GPU协同工作的专用处理器。然而，当下一个主要缺点是，即使是AI发展的速度再快，也存在CPU/GPU也无法训练的情况，比如需要额外的硬件来执行复杂任务的数学计算等，这个时候AI芯片的重要性就凸显出来。今年，英特尔，NVidia，AMD，ARM，华为，高通等领先的芯片制造商都已经将AI芯片的生产提上了日程，在2019年，他们将生产能够快速提高基于AI执行速度的芯片，这些芯片将应用在不限于计算机视觉、语言处理等多种定制用途，更完全会根据市场需要，推出特定使用在如医疗保健以及汽车行业专业芯片。AI+IoT2019年，AI和IoT的结合，将达到1+1>2的效果。对AI来说，因为AI可以提升精度，并提高其分析和预测性维护方面的功能，因而IoT设备通过AI神经网络的高级机器学习模型的优化，甚至嵌入专门设计的AI芯片，将实现万物互联更为多样性的适配。除此之外，2019年，随着5G的普及，所有设备和基础设施都会联结在一起，技术和产品会使得我们整个社会的效率越来越高，加之AI+IoT也将越来越多地融入边缘计算，大多数经过云训练的模型都将放在边缘层，最终从云到边缘再到终端，最后这张网将会越来越复杂。自动化机器学习随着AutoML（自动机器学习）算法的到来，机器学习将发生根本变化。AutoML将允许开发人员和程序员在不创建特定模型的情况下解决复杂问题。AutoML的优势在于它可以使分析师和开发人员只关注有关问题，而不是整个流程和工作流程。因此，AutoML独特地融合了灵活性和可移植性。AutoML与认知API和自定义ML平台无缝对齐，通过直接解决问题而不是完成整个工作流程，来节省大量时间和精力。AI+网络安全由于网络安全专家的需求和供应存在巨大差距，以及网络安全的缺点以及需要采用创新方法的安全漏洞风险不断增加，2019年，人工智能和机器学习在网络安全中的使用将会大幅度提升。其中，尤其是具备海量大数据的组织随着系统规模的扩大以及警惕地监控威胁需要，在没有人工智能的情况下，网络安全流程会变得脆弱并导致效率降低，因此，将AI纳入网络安全并不意味着不需要专家，反之，AI将赋予专家更多的权力并使得安全系统更加完善。AI技能据报道，在2018年，人工智能已经成为薪酬最高的工作之一，并且许多组织及高校已经在人工智能领域的技能培训和学科培养上加大投入，同样的趋势在2019年也将继续。然而，其中有一些挑战也正在出现，比如企业自身难以在短期培养一个具备强人工智能技能的高级人才，因此，他们可能更趋向于选择设立一个不需要监督的人工智能工具进行替代。通过AI实现DevOps的自动化如今，互联网生成的海量数据无法估量，往往需要对其进行过滤后再实现分析，其中，使用AI对数据集进行整理，来找到可以满足硬件和其他应用软件的相关性和新模式，将逐渐成为主流。在2019年，最优的解决方案，是在这些数据集上应用机器学习模型使它们具有预测性，并且随着AI的不断深入，管理IT基础架构的方式将被重新定位，在IT运营中部署AI将帮助他们在更短的时间内完成任务，并快速解决问题，因此，基于AI的DevOps将于2019年投入运营，云供应商等将从中受益匪浅。神经网络互操作在目前的一些神经网络操作中，最主要问题存在于选择最合适的框架，因此，开发人员往往面临从一系列工具中进行选择的艰难问题，不仅局限于Apache MXNet，Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit，TensorFlow等等。这是因为神经网络一旦选择并训练了特定模型，就很难再在另一个框架上工作， 为了应对这一挑战，AWS，Facebook和Microsoft合作构建了开放式神经网络交换（ONNX），这使得在多个框架中重用经过训练的神经网络模型成为可能，2019年，神经网络中互操作性的突破会成为AI的重点趋势之一。开源AI2019年，AI大多数的项目都会进行开源，是因为越来越多的公司开始关注协作和知识共享，人工智能也会遵循相同的发展轨迹。开源AI作为人工智能发展的下一个阶段，多家公司将开始开放他们的AI堆栈，以建立更广泛的AI社区支持网络。Gartner预测“到2020年，AI技术将普遍出现在几乎每一个新的软件产品和服务中”，在那天到来之前，开源AI将一直扮演重要角色。目前，包括Acumos AI、Facebook框架、Yahoo的CaffeOnSpark、Google的TensorFlow 、H2O.ai以及Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit等，都作为比较主流的开源AI工具在市场中占据大量份额，除此之外，更多的AI公司也正在争相开源自己的项目。实际上，伴随2019年的到来，没有人能预见到AI领域到底会发生哪些令人难以置信的变革，我们仅能从这些趋势中，感受到足以令人十分兴奋的未来。

AI: It’s not as scary as movies would like for us to think. Explore the everyday uses of this extraordinary tech as well as how enterprises can begin to trust the new insights from AI in addition to human-powered decision making.

中国“芯”鲁克：听众朋友大家好！币海听潮节目又跟大家见面了，我是主持人鲁克，今天我们想跟大家分享一个话题叫“中国的芯片”。参加我们节目的还有一位币圈的朋友，小苏。小苏：鲁克你好！各位听众朋友大家好！鲁克：小苏，今天我们要跟大家分享一个有关“中国芯片”的话题。我们知道在今年4月17号，美国商务部发出一条禁令，禁止美国的公司出售芯片和有关的元器件产品及服务给中信通讯。这样的一个禁令引发中国舆论广泛的讨论，媒体也发表了很多的文章。那么在币圈有一个评论员叫肖磊，他这样写道：如果中国整个芯片市场都遭遇美国出口禁令，那么中国想获得芯片的唯一方式，似乎就变成了目前处于灰色地带的数字货币挖矿产业，这个领域，有的是办法去突破封锁，那么中国几大矿机生产商都在开发自己的芯片，而且小有成就。那我们知道，肖磊他的意思是指中国的芯，要依靠这个数字矿挖矿机这一个产业。那我想问一下小苏，就是手机芯片和这个数字矿机使用的芯片有什么不同吗？小苏：从肖磊的评论中我们可以看出，肖磊事实上是把挖矿芯片制造商制造挖矿芯片的能力，和制造手机芯片的能力等同起来了。这事实上他是基于他对这个手机芯片的不了解，以及对挖矿芯片的不了解所造成的。我们知道手机中包含着很多芯片，那手机中有包含CPU跟基带芯片在内的共计接近20种芯片，而挖矿芯片只是一种特定的、做特定用途的一种比较简单的芯片，虽然它的能效很高，但是它跟手机中诸多的复杂的芯片，现在根本就不能相提并论。鲁克：那小苏您的意思就是说挖矿的芯片和这个手机的芯片是两码事、两回事，对不对？小苏：对。鲁克：好，那么我们知道在这个市场上，普遍认为这个挖矿的最大的厂商是比特大陆，对吧？它的老板吴忌寒，他支持的这个币种就是比特币现金，那最近比特币现金一路狂涨，涨了很多很多，那么肖磊就认为是跟这个美国的禁令有关，他在文章中这样写的，我读一遍，他说比特币现金的转折点，非常巧合的发生在4月17号，最后一次拉升。原因有两个，一个：一些人已经知道消息了，或者是一些人明显的开始支持中国矿厂，果不其然。4月21号，中央电视台一套重点的晚间新闻里面，报道了中国数字货币矿机最大生产商比特大陆，其中报道的内容是吹捧了一下比特大陆在人工智能领域开发出的芯片。我们看到4月17号，美国对中兴通讯发出禁令，第二天开始，中国数字货币的矿工主导的比特币现金开始暴涨。截至目前，当时的状态（写文章的时候），短短七天内，也就是4月17号之后的七天内，那BCH也就是比特币现金拉升了70%，暴涨！那小苏，你认为肖磊对比特币现金暴涨的这个行情的分析有没有道理？小苏：看起来好像他的这个行情分析有一定的道理，有一定的这个还是用CCTV的新闻来作为支持的，事实上他对这个比特币现金行情的分析和对中国股市的分析是同样的手法，中国股市我们（知道）有很多都是基于内幕消息，一些政策利好，因此造成某只股票短期暴涨，这就相当于肖磊把比特币现金当成了矿机上的一只股票，这么来看的。鲁克：我明白了，就是说比特币现金的暴涨拉升，实际上跟中国人对中国芯片的期待是没有什么关系的，对不对？小苏：对！鲁克：那么但是我们知道矿机生产商它在研发这个AI芯片，我们中国政府对AI芯片是有很高的期待的。据说我们在有报告说，我们在2025年争取研发出来这种人工智能芯片，可以用于无人驾驶。那这个矿机生产商在研发AI芯片，然后对这个比特币现金没有政治上的利好吗？小苏：中国矿机生产商在生产AI芯片，这是一个事实，而且在2017年的时候，比特大陆的AI芯片叫算丰，它去年而且已经投产，而已经投入市场。据说已经在这个视频识别这个行业已经投入应用了。还有一些另一家这个矿机生产商，它也是造那个挖矿芯片，叫嘉楠云智。如果大家对币圈比较熟悉的话，都知道嘉楠云智是它是最早啊造出这个阿瓦隆矿机的这么一个厂商。在当前的AI市场上，可以说英伟达是唯一的巨头，它能基本上垄断了各级市场，那AI的芯片应用，它分几个番，他分几种，基本上可以分为两类，一类叫训练端，一类叫应用端。不管在训练端还是在应用端，那个英伟达都有它的布局，而且基本上都占有了市场绝大部分份额。那应用端实际上也分两个层级，一个是面向企业市场的服务器端，另一个就是面向个人消费市场的应用端。那个人应用端其实讲的就是，类似在手机上的AI芯片。谷歌和华为的手机中其实已经搭载了类似的AI芯片，那服务器应用端其实就是，一方面是这个硬件的硬件的市场，另一方面就是类似阿里巴巴和亚马逊云的这个云解决方案。鲁克：您的意思就是说现在像英伟达这样的厂商，这几乎是垄断了这个最新先进的这个芯片技术了，而且有很长的时间和历史。那么在整个领域里面，它几乎是用霸主的地位了，那么也像我们这个矿机矿主这个比特大陆，他们去做的这个芯片是应用专业的这种芯片，它离这个我们所说的这个英伟达其实有很大的一个距离，是不是这样子的？小苏：是的！因为因为达它其实是在AI领域，唯一做到它在全产业链在三级市场上都有产品布局，而且是做做到了这个市场占有率垄断了这个市场。那在AI市场上去挑战美国的这些IT巨头，已经是很难完成的工作。即使你在AI市场上，你能挑战他们的实力，而还不等于你能挑战就是在这个像PC跟手机端的CPU的市场，所以未来仍然是任重道远。那肖磊所做的解读只可能只是个人的一厢情愿跟主观臆断吧，我们只能这么解读。鲁克：这样看来这个肖磊可能对这个芯片整个产业并不是很了解，然后呢，当然他这个期待是符合我们广大中国人的这个爱国心的，这个中国芯如何才能实现、才能落地，其实超越欧美这个还是需要很长的这个时间去发展的。好，今天我们这个话题就到这里，感谢各位的收听，谢谢大家。再见！小苏：听众朋友再见！（完）.

Show Notes 将棋・囲碁で人間がAIに勝てなくなった AIに仕事を奪われる職種とは？ プログラミング的思考の根底にあるもの AIが得意な仕事と人間にしかできない仕事 ITによる業務効率化で仕事のスタイルは変わった？ シリコンバレーでのプログラミング教育 教育者の負担を減らすための仕組み プログラミングを通して学べること キーボード入力から音声入力がスタンダードに ゴールはネット上で自己学習できるレベル Links 囲碁の最強人工知能 AlphaGo（アルファ碁）の仕組みとは？ Kodable: Programming for Kids

ユニバーサルベーシックインカムのお話 #雑談 #AI #IT #ディープラーニング

By Ted Chiang, on Buzzfeed: The Real Danger To Civilization Isn’t AI: It’s Runaway Capitalism. Chiang’s science fiction is great and I highly recommend it. This article, not so much. The gist seems to be: hypothetical superintelligent AIs sound a lot like modern capitalism. Both optimize relentlessly for their chosen goal (paperclips, money), while ignoring the whole complexity of human value.

Speaker Prof. Toby Walsh Type Live Conversation About this conversation As AI is starting to make real progress, there is a large appetite to understand where it might be taking us. Toby Walsh, a leading researcher in Artificial Intelligence, will help us understand why AI is making headlines today and why we appear to be making such significant progress. He will also discuss where AI might take us and what AI is not yet capable of, and probably won’t be capable of for some time to come. Finally, he will provide a panorama of what the associated societal risks are, and how AI is both part of the problem and most likely part of the cure. Conversation notes - Why are we making more progress with AI now than ever before? - What are the current limitations of AI? - It will take a long time before machines get as intelligent as us, let alone more intelligent than us. Machines are very slow learners. - What can we do with AI now? - We will spend more and more time interacting with machines. AI is the operating system of the future. We will all benefit greatly. - One thing we should worry about very soon is the impact that AI will have on employment. - What’s left for humans if machines are also doing the cognitive tasks? - We are going to have to change our society in radical ways to deal with the change. - The future is not fixed. The future is the product of decisions we as a society make We get to choose the future we want to live in. More about Toby Toby Walsh is one of the world’s leading researchers in Artificial Intelligence. He is a Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of New South Wales and leads a research group at Data61, Australia’s Centre of Excellence for ICT Research. He has been elected a fellow of the Association for the Advancement of AI for his contributions to AI research, and has won the prestigious Humboldt research award. He has previously held research positions in England, Scotland, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland and Sweden. Toby's Linkedin: Toby Walsh Toby's Twitter: @tobywalsh UNSW: cse.unsw.edu.au/~tw/ Toby's Book: It's Alive! Artificial Intelligence from the Logic Piano to Killer Robots Quote “Life-long education is going to be the only way we keep ahead of machines. We have to ensure we have a society that ensures that everyone has the ability and freedom to keep on re-skilling themselves so that they keep themselves employable.” Join Us Did you enjoy the conversation? If so, make sure to subscribe! To join us at Work Club Sydney or Melbourne for our speaker conversations, email us at events@workclubglobal.com. For more information on Work Club, visit workclubglobal.com

Wow, there is a lot of hype around AI? Am I right or am I wrong? I'm afraid I'm right. But, there is good reason for it. In 2016, there were 40 acquisitions of companies working to advance artificial intelligence1 and the AI market was worth $644 million2. In 2017, the market value of AI is expected to double and then grow exponentially until it reaches $38.6 billion less than ten years from now3. Inc. Magazine called 20174 the “year of AI” and most every major brand has begun fighting to enter the space. Consumer-driven companies like Google have led the charge with over 11 acquisitions in the AI category to date while business-driven companies like Salesforce, who joined the race late, have quickly begun catching up by acquiring two AI based companies in the last year[5]. AI is here to stay and it’s not just changing the market, it’s shaping the way we live and work. In this episode, Gabe Larsen, Director of InsideSales Labs discusses the InsideSales.com research report called the State of AI. The report examines trends and perceptions of the US regarding this disruptive technology. In This Episode You'll Learn: Consumers and AI: It’s Only the Beginning It Comes Down to Trust: Trepidation Around AI Our AI Future: Peering into the Crystal Ball Links and Resources Mentioned in This Episode: LinkedIn Post The State of AI Study The Sales Acceleration Group Gabe Larsen Facebook