Podcasts about Nilu

Shirin  Mu Zagaya Duniya  na wanan makon tareda Nura Ado Suleimane, ya yi duba ne kan nasarar kashe ‘yan ta'adda fiye da dubu 13 da jami'an tsaron Najeriya suka yi. Shirin kuma ya  sake waiwayar wani rahoton ƙwararru da ya ce dubun dubatar mutane ne ke rasa rayukansu a dalilin cutuka masu alaka da abincin da suke ci.Haka zalika ya taɓo batun yadda a Sudan ta Kudu kazamin rikicin da ke faruwa a yankunan da ke kusa da kogin Nilu, ya hana jami'an agaji tallafa wa yara ƙanana kimanin dubu 60 da ke fama da cutar yunwa.Akwai kuma labarin yadda Rasha ta karbi bakuncin taron ƙasashe a bikin cika shekaru 80 da samun nasarar murƙushe sojojin Nazi na Jamus abin da ya kawo ƙarshen yaƙin duniya na biyu.Shiga alamar sauti, domin sauraron cikakken shirin.

#booksthatspeak #prathambooks #niluandzubeida #migratorybird #नीलू की ज़ुबैदा #mela #friendship #birds #books #kids #reading #library #storyweaverIt's the last day of the mela. Nilu and Zubeida had plans to feast on jalebis, imarti and popcorn. But Nilu is nowhere to be seen. Did she really leave Zubi without saying goodbye?Thanks to Storyweaver for the story.Written by Asuma NoorIllustrated by Asuma NoorPublished By Pratham BooksNarrated by Asawari Doshiनीलू की ज़ुबैदा (Hindi), written by Asuma Noor, illustrated by Asuma Noor, published by Pratham Books (© Pratham Books, 2024) under a CC BY 4.0 license on StoryWeaver. Read, create and translate stories for free on www.storyweaver.org.inInstagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/booksthatspeak/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Story's Video: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://youtu.be/FHD_ZMKPUfg⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠To receive updates about Online and Offline storytelling events from Books That Speak, join the whatsapp group: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://chat.whatsapp.com/BuBaOlkD2UACckOdYk4FDg⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Listen to the podcast:iTunes : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/books-that-speak/id1287357479⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Watch Videos:YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/booksthatspeak⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.booksthatspeak.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠contact.booksthatspeak@gmail.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#booksthatspeak #stories #readaloud #hindistories #indianstories #kids #kidsstories #readbooks #books

Josefův životní příběh je jako jízda na horské dráze. Z oblíbeného a privilegovaného syna se stane otrok pak vězeň, ale nakonec zachrání nejen svou rodinu, ale i celý národ. A přitom všem zůstává věrný Bohu a učí se správně reagovat na všechny možné situace, ve kterých se ocitne.Naše současnost není o tolik jiná… a tak je toho hodně, co se ze života Josefa můžeme naučit a čím se inspirovat.Gen 41Po dvou dlouhých letech měl farao sen… Stál u Nilu a hle, z Nilu vystoupilo sedm nápadně krásných a tučných krav a pásly se v mokřině. Náhle za nimi z Nilu vystoupilo sedm jiných krav, nápadně ošklivých a hubených; postavily se k těm prvním kravám na břehu Nilu a tyto ošklivé a hubené krávy sežraly těch sedm krásných a tučných. Vtom se Farao probudil. Když znovu usnul, měl další sen: Na jednom stéble vyrostlo sedm bohatých a pěkných klasů. Náhle za nimi vyrazilo sedm klasů hubených a sežehlých východním větrem a ty hubené klasy pohltily těch sedm bohatých a pěkných. Vtom se farao probudil a hle, byl to sen. Ráno pak byl farao velmi rozrušen, a tak si dal zavolat všechny věštce a mudrce Egypta a vyprávěl jim své sny. Nikdo je však faraonovi neuměl vyložit.Tehdy k faraonovi promluvil vrchní číšník: „Musím dnes připomenout své prohřešky.Farao si tedy dal Josefa zavolat. Spěšně ho vytáhli z jámy, a když se oholil a převlékl si šaty, přišel k faraonovi. Ten Josefovi řekl: „Měl jsem sen a nikdo ho neumí vyložit. Slyšel jsem však o tobě, že jakmile uslyšíš sen, vyložíš ho.” Josef faraonovi odpověděl: „Ne já, ale Bůh dá faraonovi příznivou odpověď!“ Josef tedy faraonovi řekl: „Faraonův sen je jeden a tentýž. Bůh faraonovi oznámil, co se chystá učinit: „A že byl ten sen faraonovi dvakrát zopakován, znamená, že ta věc je u Boha jistá a Bůh ji brzy vykoná.“ Nechť tedy farao vybere rozvážného a moudrého muže a ustanoví ho nad egyptskou zemí. Nechť farao začne jednat. Ať ustaví nad zemí úředníky a během těch sedmi let hojnosti vybírá pětinu úrody egyptské země. Faraonovi i všem jeho služebníkům se ten návrh líbil. Farao to probíral se svými služebníky:  „Cožpak najdeme někoho, v kom by byl Boží Duch jako v něm?“Farao tedy oslovil Josefa: „Jelikož ti Bůh dal poznat toto vše, nikdo nebude tak rozvážný a moudrý jako ty!” Ty budeš správcem mého domu a všechen můj lid se podrobí tvým rozkazům. Sám tě budu převyšovat jen trůnem. Potom farao Josefovi řekl: „Hle, ustanovuji tě správcem nad celou egyptskou zemí!“ Farao sňal z ruky svůj pečetní prsten a navlékl ho na ruku Josefovi; oblékl mu kmentové roucho a na krk mu pověsil zlatý řetěz. Potom ho nechal vozit ve voze jako svého zástupce a provolávat před ním: „Na kolena!“ Tak ho ustanovil správcem nad celou egyptskou zemí. Farao Josefovi řekl: „Já jsem farao, ale bez tvého svolení nikdo v celém Egyptě nepohne rukou ani nohou!“ Tehdy dal farao Josefovi jméno Cafnat-paneach a oženil ho s Asenat, dcerou Putifery, kněze z Heliopole. Tak se Josef dostal do čela egyptské země. Když stanul před faraonem, králem Egypta, bylo Josefovi třicet let.Josef dal prvorozenému jméno Manases, Zapomnění, neboť řekl: „Bůh mi dal zapomenout na všechno mé strádání, na celý můj otcovský dům.“ Druhému pak dal jméno Efraim, Plodnost, neboť řekl: „Bůh mě v zemi mého trápení učinil plodným.” Hlad zachvátil celý svět. Josef tehdy otevřel všechny obilnice a prodával Egypťanům zrní, neboť hlad se rozmáhal i v egyptské zemi. Celý svět přicházel k Josefovi do Egypta nakupovat zrní, protože se po celém světě rozmohl hlad.Gen 47, 18 - 19, 23 - 25Smýšlejte tak, jak smýšlel Kristus Ježíš:Ačkoli sdílel Boží podstatu,na své rovnosti s ním netrval.Místo toho se vzdal sám sebe: přijal podstatu služebníka, vzal na sebe lidskou podobu. Ocitl se v těle jako člověk, ponížil se a byl poslušný, a to až k smrti – k smrti na kříži!

Třítýdenní výprava do Ugandy s pobytem v hlavním městě Kampale a výpravou do districtu West Nile /vest najl/ byla první zkušeností Julči a Vojty s africkou kulturou. Mimo jiné i o tom, že vás překvapí, že místní člověk potmě není vidět, dokud se neusměje :-D, bude řeč v cestovatelském týdeníku Za obzor, který pro vás připravila Lída Matušková.

Our guest, Nilu Rustomji, brings a unique perspective to the conversation of Botox, wrinkle relaxers and all things skincare, having studied psychology before entering the medical field. This background illuminates her holistic approach to facial aesthetics—treating not just the physical appearance but understanding the emotional journey of each patient. Through candid discussion, we unpack common misconceptions about injectables and reveal surprising medical applications most people don't know about. From treating migraines to helping with excessive sweating, these treatments have therapeutic benefits far beyond cosmetic enhancement.The episode takes a turn when we examine the ethics of aesthetic medicine. Nilu shares her process for screening patients, including watching for body dysmorphic disorder signs, and Carmen contrasts her nurturing approach,  with some practitioners who may make clients feel "broken" to sell more services. We also explore important considerations for special populations, such as those who are immunocompromised, and practical advice for listeners of all backgrounds—from simple skincare routines to understanding what questions to ask before getting treatments.Whether you're curious about trying cosmetic treatments or simply want to improve your skincare knowledge, this conversation offers valuable insights free from judgment. Visit yourskincoachNilu.com to learn more about the services Nilu offers and to discover personalized skincare approaches that celebrate your unique beauty.Thank you for stopping by. Please visit our website: All About The Joy and add, like and share. You can also support us by shopping at our STORE - We'd appreciate that greatly. Also, if you want to find us anywhere on social media, please check out the link in bio page. Music By Geovane Bruno, Moments, 3481Editing by Team A-JHost, Carmen Lezeth DISCLAIMER: As always, please do your own research and understand that the opinions in this podcast and livestream are meant for entertainment purposes only. States and other areas may have different rules and regulations governing certain aspects discussed in this podcast. Nothing in our podcast or livestream is meant to be medical or legal advice. Please use common sense, and when in doubt, ask a professional for advice, assistance, help and guidance.

On the show this time, it’s the propulsive poise and complexity of Nilüfer Yanya. Nilüfer Yanya is a British singer-songwriter, from an artistic family with Turkish and Barbadian heritage. She writes pensive songs, centered around her breathy contralto and her original guitar style. You could sit and think about the equivocal lyrics, or you could get off your ass and dance. Her latest is “My Method Actor” - as in she is her own, method actor - sort of learning to be herself by inhabiting herself fully. For this performance she played 5 songs from the album, which is available on Ninja Tune. Here’s Nilüfer Yanya - Live on KEXP. Recorded October 26th, 2024 Method Actor Mutations Call It Love Binding Like I Say (I Runaway) Watch the full Live on KEXP session on YouTube.Support the show: https://www.kexp.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dzisiejsi archeologowie różnią się od klasyków dyscypliny, pracują interdyscyplinarnie i korzystają z osiągnięć wielu dziedzin wiedzy – twierdzi dr Joanna Ciesielska, archeolożka pracująca między wydziałami orientalistyki i… fizyki (UW)! Badaczka opowiada o wykopaliskach w mieście Soba, stolicy dawnego królestwa Alwy, leżącego na terenie dzisiejszego Sudanu, w okolicach Chartumu. Czemu to jedno z mniej znanych dawnych państw doliny Nilu? Pyta Bartosz Pergół

Should Matt buy a used EV? ; Rivian's screen; We need more buttons; why are people after the Kei truck? Questions from Patreon members include:   Trade the Countach for a Veyron?   Why are people after the Kei truck?   Do "worse" tires make a car better?   Update on the Nilu 27 hypercar   Should I trade my C5 Corvette for a BRZ/GR86?   Is a used Maserati Ghibli Trofeo a good idea?   Integra Type-S vs Chevy SS...for snow!   Best $25,000 commuter Best blue collar watch   Why Matt doesn't want a Mustang GT350 anymore?   And more! Recorded December 18, 2024 Exclusive $35-off Carver Mat at AuraFrames.com. Use code TIRE at checkout to save!Go to NordVPN.com/tst and use code TST to get a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount.  New merch! Grab a shirt or hoodie and support us! https://thesmokingtireshop.com/ Use Off The Record! and ALWAYS fight your tickets! Enter code TSTPOD for a 10% discount on your first case on the Off The Record app, or go to https://www.offtherecord.com/TST Want your question answered? Want to watch the live stream, get ad-free podcasts, or exclusive podcasts? Join our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thesmokingtirepodcast Tweet at us!https://www.Twitter.com/thesmokingtirehttps://www.Twitter.com/zackklapman Instagram:https://www.Instagram.com/thesmokingtirehttps://www.Instagram.com/therealzackklapman Want your question answered? Want to watch the live stream, get ad-free podcasts, or exclusive podcasts? Join our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thesmokingtirepodcast Use Off The Record! and ALWAYS fight your tickets! Enter code TST10 for a 10% discount on your first case on the Off The Record app, or go to http://www.offtherecord.com/TST. Watch our car reviews: https://www.youtube.com/thesmokingtire Tweet at us!https://www.Twitter.com/thesmokingtirehttps://www.Twitter.com/zackklapman Instagram:https://www.Instagram.com/thesmokingtirehttps://www.Instagram.com/therealzackklapman

➡️ Co robi facet na brzegu Nilu? ➡️ Pierwsze miasta w Polsce z dostępem do Internetu ➡️ Pamiętna walka Władimira Kliczko z Tysonem Fury ➡️ Kiedy spodziewać się ataku nieprzyjaciela? ➡️ Polska produkcja nagrodzona Emmy! Realizacja: Mateusz Kosnowicz #IPPTV #Szkocka40 #MarekWieczorek ----------------------------------------------------

Co w odcinku? Głębiej i dokładniej opowiadam o przygodzie z malowaniem krokodyli i o tym jak może to przydać się i Tobie.& much more!

Co w odcinku? Rozmowa z opiekunami krokodyli zanurzona w cudnej ścieżce dźwiękowej utkanej ze śpiewów egzotycznych ptaków z Gdańskiego Ogrodu Zoologicznego.Więcej o projekcie: https://www.olafronc.com/o-krokodylu-ktory-nie-znal-nilu/ Złap reprodukcję obrazu:https://www.olafronc.com/printy/Wirtualna kawa na farby:https://buycoffee.to/olafronc & much more!

This episode we tackle some great questions from the audience including Shaun's love affair with 5.5L and 6.2L AMG's and our favourite picks from Monterey Car Week, specifically, the Nilu 27 in all it's glory.

Episode 62 we have Dodge finally revealing the pricing of the Charger EV muscle car... or electric muscle car. And it's a shocker and also not surprising. A new Hypercar entry has been revealed, and it looks like a concept from an anime movie called Nilu. Toyota is fighting new allegations of failing drivetrains and revealing the latest update to their amazing hot hatch. Ford brings back street trucks with the Lobo. I delve into channel updates for YouTube, car build updates, and more. This is CarQuicks! - #CarQuicks #CarQuicksPodcast #automotivenews #automotivepodcast #Nilu27 #Nilu #FordMaverick #maverickLobo #Lobo #GRCorolla #2025GRCorolla #CorolalGR #E210 #hothatch #VWGTi #GTIEV #Dodge #Challenger #ScatPack #ChallengerEV #Fratzonic #Toyota #Tacoma #Episode62 #DodogeCharger - 00:00 Introduction 03:38 Dodge Charager EV | Pricing 18:27 NILU Hypercar 25:18 VW GTi EV |Better than the original? 29:14 Toyota Engine Issues | Tacoma Transmission Failures? 32:34 2025 GR Corolla 36:46 2025 Ford Maverick LOBO 39:38 GR Corolla Updates 42:22 Outro

Follow @motorator Follow @weaveroncars Follow @edmunds Presented by Bravago Beverages

Orbán a nemzeti kártyával tett egy gesztust Putyinnak, de csak később derül ki, hogy ez mire volt jó Telex     2024-08-08 13:59:52     Belföld Vlagyimir Putyin Fehéroroszország Nemzetbiztonság Orbán-Putyin Schengen Belarusz A magyar kormányon múlik, hogy nemzetbiztonsági kockázat lesz-e a nemzeti kártyából, amivel orosz és belarusz állampolgárok is jöhetnek dolgozni a schengeni határokon belülre. Rácz András Oroszország-szakértő szerint több súlyos ellentmondás is van az ügyben. Ha nem lesz mennyiségi korlátozás, még nehezebb lesz az érkezők alapos átvilágítása, miköz Eurókötvények: a külföldiek előnyben 24.hu     2024-08-08 15:28:20     Gazdaság Hozam A megtakarítók búcsút inthettek a magas hozamú lakossági devizapapíroknak, és jelenleg mindössze egy sorozatra tudnak ajánlatot tenni. Védjegyoltalmat kért Mészáros Lőrinc, mutatjuk mire Forbes     2024-08-08 15:48:03     Cégvilág Hitel Mészáros Lőrinc Mészároséké lesz a Superhuman Center kifejezés, és érdekeltségei sorra kapják a milliárdos hiteleket saját bankjától. Új magyar kutyafajtát jegyeztek be 444.hu     2024-08-08 17:23:47     Belföld A sinkát boxerekből, pitbull terrierekből és németjuhászokból tenyésztették ki, szürkemarhák és juhok terelésére nevelik. Egyből vakmerőt húzhattak az ukránok: orosz ellenőrzésű terület felett bukkantak fel az F-16-osok Portfolio     2024-08-08 15:55:00     Külföld Ukrajna Vadászgép F-16-os vadászgépeket észleltek a herszoni régió orosz megszállás alatt álló területén – számolt be róla a TASZSZ orosz hírügynökség helyi hivatalnokok jelentése alapján. A semmiből jött az év legizgalmasabb autója Vezess     2024-08-08 11:42:49     Autó-motor A Nilu szembemegy mindennel, amit korunk autóipara hirdet. Sem villamosítást, sem digitalizációt nem alkalmaz, csak színtiszta, nyers erőt. Megegyezett a TV2 Csoport a Premier League és az Emirates FA-kupa sugárzásáról Media1     2024-08-08 10:49:30     Média TV2 Premier League Emirates Újabb hosszútávú szerződést kötött a TV2 Média Csoport a Premier League és az Emirates FA-kupa sugárzásáról. A külföldiek eldobálják japán részvényeiket, az ukrán támadás felnyomja a gáz árát Privátbankár     2024-08-08 12:18:07     Gazdaság Ukrajna USA Japán Tőzsde Részvény A japán tőzsde most épp esett, az európaiak követték. Az amerikai nyitás sem tűnik rózsásnak, de némi reményt ad, hogy a forint még nem ostromolja a 400-as szintet. A zöldlogisztikában látja a jövőt a DHL vg.hu     2024-08-08 16:28:33     Cégvilág DHL A DHL Express az elmúlt években jelentős erőforrásokat fordított a digitális és zöldfejlesztésekre, és ezek az irányok meghatározóak maradnak az előttünk álló években is – nyilatkozta a Világgazdaságnak Mészáros Ádám, a DHL Express Magyarország Kft. ügyvezető igazgatója. A bográcsban és a tűzön készített ételek lesznek a főszereplői az idei Magyar Ízek Utcájának Magyar Hírlap     2024-08-08 15:38:00     Belföld A rendezvény legfontosabb célja, hogy idén is bemutassa, milyen izgalmas a magyar gasztrokultúra. Gyurcsány Ferenc és Dobrev Klára reakciója a női kajakosok bronzérmére Liner     2024-08-08 14:32:34     Belföld Olimpia Párizs Gyurcsány Ferenc Kajak-kenu Dobrev Klára Gyurcsány Ferenc és Dobrev Klára is nagyon örül annak, hogy a női kajakosok végül bronzérmet szereztek a párizsi olimpián. Kiss Ágnes után Takács Kincső kenus is harmadikként ért célba előfutamában Demokrata     2024-08-08 11:31:39     Olimpia Kajak-kenu Takács Kincső Takács Kincső is harmadikként ért célba előfutamában a női kenusok 200 méteres versenyében. A DVTK-nak nem kellett, Rooney-nak viszont igen – Szűcs Kornél útja az angol másodosztályig Büntető.com     2024-08-08 13:45:03     Foci Hajdú-Bihar Hétvége Debrecen Anglia Kecskemét DVTK Diósgyőri VTK Wednesday Néhány nappal ezelőtt érdekes pletyka látott napvilágot, miszerint a Kecskemét védőjéért, Szűcs Kornélért az angol másodosztályban szereplő Plymouth Argyle jelentkezett be. A pletykából valóság lett, így a 22 éves, utánpótlás-válogatott játékos ezen a hétvégén már nem a Debrecen, hanem a Sheffield Wednesday elleni összecsapásra készülhet. Hétvégére fokozódik a hőség Kiderül     2024-08-08 14:01:02     Időjárás Hétvége Kánikula Csapadék A hidegfront átvonulását követően a hétvégén és a jövő hét első napjaiban is országszerte 30 fok feletti csúcshőmérsékletre számíthatunk. Csapadék már nem valószínű. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Orbán a nemzeti kártyával tett egy gesztust Putyinnak, de csak később derül ki, hogy ez mire volt jó Telex     2024-08-08 13:59:52     Belföld Vlagyimir Putyin Fehéroroszország Nemzetbiztonság Orbán-Putyin Schengen Belarusz A magyar kormányon múlik, hogy nemzetbiztonsági kockázat lesz-e a nemzeti kártyából, amivel orosz és belarusz állampolgárok is jöhetnek dolgozni a schengeni határokon belülre. Rácz András Oroszország-szakértő szerint több súlyos ellentmondás is van az ügyben. Ha nem lesz mennyiségi korlátozás, még nehezebb lesz az érkezők alapos átvilágítása, miköz Eurókötvények: a külföldiek előnyben 24.hu     2024-08-08 15:28:20     Gazdaság Hozam A megtakarítók búcsút inthettek a magas hozamú lakossági devizapapíroknak, és jelenleg mindössze egy sorozatra tudnak ajánlatot tenni. Védjegyoltalmat kért Mészáros Lőrinc, mutatjuk mire Forbes     2024-08-08 15:48:03     Cégvilág Hitel Mészáros Lőrinc Mészároséké lesz a Superhuman Center kifejezés, és érdekeltségei sorra kapják a milliárdos hiteleket saját bankjától. Új magyar kutyafajtát jegyeztek be 444.hu     2024-08-08 17:23:47     Belföld A sinkát boxerekből, pitbull terrierekből és németjuhászokból tenyésztették ki, szürkemarhák és juhok terelésére nevelik. Egyből vakmerőt húzhattak az ukránok: orosz ellenőrzésű terület felett bukkantak fel az F-16-osok Portfolio     2024-08-08 15:55:00     Külföld Ukrajna Vadászgép F-16-os vadászgépeket észleltek a herszoni régió orosz megszállás alatt álló területén – számolt be róla a TASZSZ orosz hírügynökség helyi hivatalnokok jelentése alapján. A semmiből jött az év legizgalmasabb autója Vezess     2024-08-08 11:42:49     Autó-motor A Nilu szembemegy mindennel, amit korunk autóipara hirdet. Sem villamosítást, sem digitalizációt nem alkalmaz, csak színtiszta, nyers erőt. Megegyezett a TV2 Csoport a Premier League és az Emirates FA-kupa sugárzásáról Media1     2024-08-08 10:49:30     Média TV2 Premier League Emirates Újabb hosszútávú szerződést kötött a TV2 Média Csoport a Premier League és az Emirates FA-kupa sugárzásáról. A külföldiek eldobálják japán részvényeiket, az ukrán támadás felnyomja a gáz árát Privátbankár     2024-08-08 12:18:07     Gazdaság Ukrajna USA Japán Tőzsde Részvény A japán tőzsde most épp esett, az európaiak követték. Az amerikai nyitás sem tűnik rózsásnak, de némi reményt ad, hogy a forint még nem ostromolja a 400-as szintet. A zöldlogisztikában látja a jövőt a DHL vg.hu     2024-08-08 16:28:33     Cégvilág DHL A DHL Express az elmúlt években jelentős erőforrásokat fordított a digitális és zöldfejlesztésekre, és ezek az irányok meghatározóak maradnak az előttünk álló években is – nyilatkozta a Világgazdaságnak Mészáros Ádám, a DHL Express Magyarország Kft. ügyvezető igazgatója. A bográcsban és a tűzön készített ételek lesznek a főszereplői az idei Magyar Ízek Utcájának Magyar Hírlap     2024-08-08 15:38:00     Belföld A rendezvény legfontosabb célja, hogy idén is bemutassa, milyen izgalmas a magyar gasztrokultúra. Gyurcsány Ferenc és Dobrev Klára reakciója a női kajakosok bronzérmére Liner     2024-08-08 14:32:34     Belföld Olimpia Párizs Gyurcsány Ferenc Kajak-kenu Dobrev Klára Gyurcsány Ferenc és Dobrev Klára is nagyon örül annak, hogy a női kajakosok végül bronzérmet szereztek a párizsi olimpián. Kiss Ágnes után Takács Kincső kenus is harmadikként ért célba előfutamában Demokrata     2024-08-08 11:31:39     Olimpia Kajak-kenu Takács Kincső Takács Kincső is harmadikként ért célba előfutamában a női kenusok 200 méteres versenyében. A DVTK-nak nem kellett, Rooney-nak viszont igen – Szűcs Kornél útja az angol másodosztályig Büntető.com     2024-08-08 13:45:03     Foci Hajdú-Bihar Hétvége Debrecen Anglia Kecskemét DVTK Diósgyőri VTK Wednesday Néhány nappal ezelőtt érdekes pletyka látott napvilágot, miszerint a Kecskemét védőjéért, Szűcs Kornélért az angol másodosztályban szereplő Plymouth Argyle jelentkezett be. A pletykából valóság lett, így a 22 éves, utánpótlás-válogatott játékos ezen a hétvégén már nem a Debrecen, hanem a Sheffield Wednesday elleni összecsapásra készülhet. Hétvégére fokozódik a hőség Kiderül     2024-08-08 14:01:02     Időjárás Hétvége Kánikula Csapadék A hidegfront átvonulását követően a hétvégén és a jövő hét első napjaiban is országszerte 30 fok feletti csúcshőmérsékletre számíthatunk. Csapadék már nem valószínű. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

In this special episode, Lisa reconnects with a long-time colleague, Nilüfer Devecigil, who joins her from Turkey. Nilüfer completed her master's degree in psychology in the US and worked closely with Byron and Carol Norton, the pioneers of Experiential Play Therapy. She's also the lead teacher for Experiential Play Therapy in Turkey. With extensive experience in attachment parenting and trauma healing, Nilüfer currently practices as a play therapist for young children and an attachment parenting therapist for pregnant women and new mothers. Listeners, you might not know that Experiential Play Therapy is one of the foundational models that influenced Synergetic Play Therapy. This conversation feels like we're going back to our roots a bit. Episode Highlights: Lisa and Nilüfer's Journey: Discover how Lisa and Nilüfer met over 20 years ago, learning Experiential Play Therapy together. Foundations of Experiential Play Therapy: Understand the philosophy and humanistic approach championed by Byron and Carol Norton. Parent Involvement: Learn how parents are integrally involved in the therapeutic process, making it very relational. Unique Aspects of Experiential Play Therapy: Explore what sets this modality apart, including the five stages of the therapeutic process and the use of themes and metaphors in play. Active Participation in Play: Lisa shares her appreciation for the unique aspect of experiencing play alongside the child, fully engaging in the roles assigned by the child. Healing Through Play: Hear how parents heal alongside their children through this model of play therapy. Framework and Personal Focus: Discover how Nilüfer integrates her focus on attachment and relational work within the framework of Experiential Play Therapy. Double Awareness in Play Therapy: Learn about the concept of dual or “double awareness” and its significance for both child clients and therapists. Therapist's Own Work: Hear why it's so important for us as therapists to do our own therapeutic work.   Experience Experiential Play Therapy through numerous examples and stories of how it works with child clients and their parents. Join us for an enlightening conversation that takes us back to the roots of Synergetic Play Therapy and gives a beautiful overview of this impactful therapeutic approach.  If you would like to connect with Nilüfer Devecigil, follow her on her Instagram page here.  Podcast Resources:  Synergetic Play Therapy Institute Synergetic Play Therapy Learning Website FREE Resources to support you on your play therapy journey  Aggression in Play Therapy: A Neurobiological Approach to Integrating Intensity * If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a five-star rating and review on Apple Podcast, subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts, and invite your friends/fellow colleagues to join us.  

Cestovatel Petr Vavrouška zažil v Egyptě mnohá „poprvé“! Poprvé v životě jel na dovolenou s cestovní kanceláří, poprvé se projel na čtyřkolkách pouští a poprvé v této sérii se na cestu vydal společně se svou rodinou. Jak si Luxor, plavbu po Nilu a potápění u korálového útesu užili? Nad očekávání!

Today's Song of the Day is “Like I Say (I runaway)” by Nilüfer Yanya.

Wykład prof. Włodziemierza Godlewskiego, kierownika Zakładu Archeologii Egiptu i Nubii UW towarzyszył otwarciu Galerii Faras w Muzeum Narodowym w Warszawie. Październik 2014 r. https://wszechnica.org.pl/wyklad/faras-50-lat-pozniej-wyklad-prof-wlodzimierza-godlewskiego/ Polskie odkrycia w Faras legły u podstaw nowej dyscypliny naukowej – nubiologii. Dziś jest obecna i rozwijana w wielu środowiskach muzealnych i uniwersyteckich w Niemczech, Anglii, Francji, Szwajcarii, Egipcie, Sudanie i Stanach Zjednoczonych, a także w Polsce. Warto ocenić wyniki badań w Faras z obecnej perspektywy, po 60 latach polskich i międzynarodowych badań w Nubii. Zabytki kultury i sztuki nubijskiej z okresu chrześcijańskiego do zbiorów muzealnych trafiły dzięki polskim archeologom uczestniczącym w wielkiej międzynarodowej akcji ratowania pozostałości dawnych kultur Doliny Nilu. Dzięki pracom badawczym prowadzonym na terenie starożytnego ośrodka miejskiego Faras odkryto dobrze zachowane ruiny kościoła katedralnego z VIII wieku. Jego ściany były pokryte wspaniałymi malowidłami o tematyce religijnej pochodzącymi z VIII–XIV wieku. Dziś malowidła te można obejrzeć w Galerii Faras – największej w Europie ekspozycji sztuki nubijskiej. Włodzimierz Godlewski – profesor Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, kierownik Zakładu Archeologii Egiptu i Nubii. Archeolog specjalizujący się w badaniach kultury późno antycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej w dolinie Nilu. Prowadzi badania terenowe na terenie Egiptu, Sudanu i Palestyny. W latach 1969–1997 pracownik Muzeum Narodowego. Członek kilku międzynarodowych towarzystw naukowych, przez kilka kadencji członek zarządu Międzynarodowego Towarzystwa Studiów Koptyjskich i Międzynarodowego Towarzystwa Nubiologicznego, regularnie uczestniczy w międzynarodowych posiedzeniach naukowych. Organizował w Warszawie III międzynarodowy Kongres Koptologiczny w 1984 roku oraz XI Międzynarodowy Kongres Nubiologiczny w 2006 roku. Galeria Faras jest jedyną w Europie i wyjątkową w skali światowej ekspozycją zabytków kultury i sztuki nubijskiej z okresu chrześcijańskiego. Do zbiorów muzealnych trafiły one dzięki polskim archeologom uczestniczącym w latach 60-tych ubiegłego wieku w objętej patronatem UNESCO wielkiej międzynarodowej akcji ratowania pozostałości dawnych kultur Doliny Nilu. Dzięki pracom badawczym prowadzonym na terenie starożytnego ośrodka miejskiego Faras w pobliżu granicy sudańsko-egipskiej odkryto dobrze zachowane ruiny kościoła katedralnego z VIII wieku. Jego ściany były pokryte wspaniałymi malowidłami o tematyce religijnej pochodzącymi z VIII–XIV wieku. 67 przedstawień malarskich, a także wiele innych dzieł faraskich znajdujących się w MNW, stanowi dziś największy i najcenniejszy zespół zabytków archeologicznych pochodzących z wykopalisk prowadzonych za granicą, jaki kiedykolwiek udało się pozyskać do polskich zbiorów muzealnych. Jesienią 2014 roku Galeria Faras została udostępniona widzom w nowej aranżacji, a bezcenne dzieła prezentowane są według nowego scenariusza. W części sali zaprojektowanej tak, by oddawała nastrój panujący w historycznym wnętrzu sakralnym, znajdują się malowidła rozmieszczone podobnie jak w faraskiej świątyni. Oglądając je, można posłuchać oryginalnych koptyjskich śpiewów liturgicznych. Dzięki multimediom, dla których przeznaczona została specjalna przestrzeń, zwiedzający – także z dysfunkcjami wzroku i słuchu – zapoznają się z dziejami Nubii chrześcijańskiej, architekturą, malowidłami katedry, a także z ich ciekawą ikonografią. Znajdź nas: https://www.youtube.com/c/WszechnicaFWW/ https://www.facebook.com/WszechnicaFWW1/ https://anchor.fm/wszechnicaorgpl---historia https://anchor.fm/wszechnica-fww-nauka https://wszechnica.org.pl/ #faras #historia #muzeumnarodowe #michałowski #archeologia #egipt #afryka #nil

D&N are back. Finally I got some time from them. The episode is ati-random, I just played along and recorded what came my way. You can get glimpses of the changing genres Dia is reading, Nilu's new levels of naughtiness and enough dad-bashing to keep you engaged. This one is, direct-dilse. So, have fun, everyone!

Welcome Citizens and happy Sunday! You are tuned in to PFB Radio, Number 197! On this weeks episode, we go deep with new music from Nils Hoffmann, BLR, Mass Digital and many others! My Cooltown Key To The City, goes out to NILU with Foraar. Cooltown - PFB Radio 197 Tracklist: 1. Corsini - Golem (Original Mix) 2. Movee On - Definition (LAEHY & MOVEE ON) 3. Nils Hoffmann - Higher Power 4. Bolier - Best Friend (Never Let Me Down) [BLR Mix] 5. Fractal Architect - Time Dilation 6. Space Food & Tommy Veanud - Paititi

Are you a leader whose  energy has given way to stress,  and now you are on the edge of burnout? You're not alone.Leadership is undeniably rewarding, yet it comes with its share of hurdles. In this episode, our guest, Neelu  Kaur, has walked this path and shared  her compelling stories, invaluable lessons, and actionable steps that breathed new life into her leadership journey.Neelu holds a BS from NYU Stern School of Business and M.A in Social and Organizational Psychology from Columbia University, and is a certified NLP Master Practitioner and Coach from NLP Center of New York. She has 15 years of experience specializing in adult learning and leadership development in financial services, consulting and tech industry. She focuses on leadership, mindfulness and burnout management for individuals, teams, and organizations. Nilu recently published her first book, Be Your Own Cheerleader, which focuses on self-advocacy for Asian and South Asian women.Tips to Prevent Burnout as Leaders     ✅ Have a daily routine and rituals ✅Chunk down your plans and time ✅Tap your five senses to reset your mind If you apply these tools, you'll have ✨ Clarity and Direction  ✨Increased Motivation  ✨Effective Time ManagementIn this interview, you will learn:00:00 min - Introduction03:16 min - Neelu Kaur's Journey 04:48 min - Tools and techniques that made a difference to Neelu 08:56 min - What is Leadership Burnout from Neelu Kaur's perspective10:01 min - Techniques used by Neelu15:37 min - Neelu's book on preventing leaders' burnout26:15 min - Connect with Neelu Kaur ( www.neelukaur.com )(Download it here: https://bit.ly/HHMGSU)THREE WAYS TO GET THE FREE RESOURCES SHARED IN THIS PROGRAM SIGN UP AT https://bit.ly/HHMGSUTEXT: Word "Joyful" to 38470. JOIN FB Group: Happy and Healthy Mind with Dr. Rozina: http://bit.ly/HHMwDRGLOVE THIS VIDEO and CHANNEL? HERE are YOUR NEXT STEPS!1) SUBSCRIBE to my channel! https://bit.ly/RozinaYT2) SHARE THIS EPISODE WITH A FRIEND3) GRAB YOUR FREE AUDIO GUIDE: “Relax on the go” https://www.stresstojoy.com/newsletter 4) SIGN UP FOR YOUR FREE Stress to Joy AUDIOBOOK on AUDIBLE: https://adbl.co/2w9LL5W 5) GET MY BOOKS/GUIDED GRATITUDE JOURNAL/AUDIOBOOKShttps://drrozina.com/books/ 6) ENROLL IN STRESS TO JOY ONLINE COURSEhttps://www.stresstojoy.com/onlinecourse 7) BOOK ME FOR YOUR SPEAKING, LEADERSHIP TRAINING, CORP. CONSULTING:  https://drrozina.com/ 8) MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR TREATMENT: https://shifahealth.org/request-an-appointment LET'S CONNECT!

On Sunday evening Nilu continued our series Good Question.

Kde je Bůh když ho zrovna potřebujeme? Poslechněte si kázání Jany Dvořáčkové s názvem “Co na to Bůh?". Exodus 1:10-22 (B21) "Pojďme si rozmyslet, co s nimi, aby se nerozmnožili ještě více! Kdyby vypukla válka, mohli by se přidat k našim nepřátelům a odejít ze země!“ Ustanovili tedy nad nimi dozorce, aby je utiskovali robotou, a izraelský lid pro faraona vystavěl zásobovací města Pitom a Rameses. Čím více jej však utiskovali, tím více rostl a tím více se rozmáhal. Egypťany jímala z Izraelitů hrůza, a tak je začali nemilosrdně zotročovat. Ztrpčovali jim život těžkou dřinou s hliněnými cihlami i všemožnou dřinou na poli. Do vší té dřiny je nemilosrdně nutili. Egyptský král tehdy řekl hebrejským porodním bábám (z nichž jedna se jmenovala Šifra a druhá Pua): „Až budete Hebrejkám pomáhat při porodu, dávejte pozor, jakého jsou pohlaví: když to bude syn, zabijte ho, když to bude dcera, nechte ji žít.“ Ty porodní báby se ale bály Boha, a tak nejednaly, jak jim řekl egyptský král, a nechávaly chlapce naživu. Egyptský král si ty porodní báby dal předvolat. „Co to provádíte?“ láteřil. „Necháváte chlapce naživu!“ Porodní báby faraonovi odpověděly: „Hebrejky nejsou jako egyptské ženy – kypí životem! Než k nim porodní bába dorazí, už mají po porodu.“ Bůh pak ty porodní báby odměnil a lid se množil a velmi se rozmáhal. A že se ty porodní báby bály Boha, dal jim rodiny. Farao nakonec přikázal všemu svému lidu: „Každého syna, který se Hebrejům narodí, hoďte do Nilu; každou dceru můžete nechat žít!“ Exodus 5:4-9 (B21) "Egyptský král ale vykřikl: „Mojžíši a Árone, proč odvádíte lid od práce? Zpátky k vašim robotám!“ Farao pokračoval: „Jen se podívejte, jak se ta cháska v zemi rozmnožila – a vy je chcete zdržovat od roboty?!“ Ještě týž den farao přikázal biřicům a dozorcům lidu: „Nedávejte už jim k výrobě cihel slámu jako dosud. Ať si ji jdou sbírat sami! Požadujte ale od nich stejné množství cihel, jako vyráběli dosud. Nic jim neslevujte, vždyť zahálejí. To proto vykřikují: ‚Pojďme obětovat našemu Bohu!‘ Zavalte ty mužské dřinou, ať mají co dělat a přestanou poslouchat báchorky!“ Exodus 14:13 (B21) "Mojžíš lidu odpověděl: „Nebojte se! Zůstaňte stát a dívejte se, jak vás dnes Hospodin zachrání.” Exodus 15:14-16 (B21) "Národy roztřesou se, až to uslyší, filištínský lid úzkost zachvátí. Tehdy se zhrozí kmeny edomské, moábských siláků se zmocní děs, všichni obyvatelé Kanaánu už se potácí! Hrůza a strach je přepadne, pro velikost paže tvé zmlknou jak kámen, než přejde tvůj lid, Hospodine, než přejde lid, jejž sis vytvořil."

Kdo se dívá na Egypt letošního roku, může mít silný pocit, že něco takového už zažil. A tak trochu bude mít pravdu, stomilionová země na Nilu je v řadě ohledů tam, kde stála před vypuknutím arabského jara před třinácti lety.

On Sunday morning Nilu continued our series Teach Us To Pray.

On this week-in-review, Crystal is joined by Chair of Sierra Club Seattle, long time communications and political strategist, Robert Cruickshank! They run through results from Tuesday's primary election for Seattle City Council, Seattle School Board & King County Council, and then take a look at Tacoma City Council, Spokane City elections, and the recall of gubernatorial candidate Semi Bird from the Richland School Board. The show concludes with reflection on the influence of editorial boards and their endorsements, particularly those of The Stranger. As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com. Find the host, Crystal Fincher, on Twitter at @finchfrii and find today's co-host, Robert Cruickshank, at @cruickshank.   Resources “RE-AIR: The Big Waterfront Bamboozle with Mike McGinn and Robert Cruickshank” from Hacks & Wonks   “Backlash to City Council incumbents doesn't materialize in primary” by Melissa Santos from Axios   “Seattle Public Schools primary election results 2023” by Dahlia Bazzaz and Monica Velez from The Seattle Times   “3 things we learned from the Pierce County primary, from council races to tax measures” by Adam Lynn from The News Tribune   “Voters favor recall of gubernatorial candidate Semi Bird from school board” by Jerry Cornfield from Washington State Standard   Find stories that Crystal is reading here   Transcript [00:00:00] Crystal Fincher: Welcome to Hacks & Wonks. I'm Crystal Fincher, and I'm a political consultant and your host. On this show, we talk with policy wonks and political hacks to gather insight into local politics and policy in Washington state through the lens of those doing the work with behind-the-scenes perspectives on what's happening, why it's happening, and what you can do about it. Be sure to subscribe to the podcast to get the full versions of our Tuesday topical show and our Friday week-in-review delivered to your podcast feed. If you like us, the most helpful thing you can do is leave a review wherever you listen to Hacks & Wonks. Full transcripts and resources referenced in the show are always available at officialhacksandwonks.com and in our episode notes. If you missed our Tuesday topical show, we re-aired an episode highlighting how the leaders we choose make consequential decisions that affect us all. Check out my conversation with Mike McGinn and Robert Cruickshank about how the SR 99 tunnel and today's Seattle waterfront came about. Today, we're continuing our Friday week-in-review shows where we review the news of the week with a co-host. Welcome back to the program, friend of the show and today's co-host: Chair of Sierra Club Seattle, long time communications and political strategist, Robert Cruickshank. Hey! [00:01:26] Robert Cruickshank: Thank you for having me on again, Crystal - excited to talk about election results this week. [00:01:30] Crystal Fincher: Yes, and we have a number to talk about. These have been very eagerly awaited results - lots of candidates and contenders, especially with the Seattle City Council elections - 45 candidates all whittled down now to two in each race going into the general election. We should probably go through the results here - District 1 and going through - what did we see and what did you think? [00:01:58] Robert Cruickshank: There are some trends you'll see as we look through these races and it's good to start district by district. And in West Seattle, in District 1, one of the trends you see is that some of the establishment candidates, the candidates Bruce Harrell's side, is really putting kind of anemic performances. You look at Rob Saka in West Seattle, who's barely ahead of Phil Tavel who's run for office several times before. And Maren Costa, the much more progressive candidate, labor candidate - is the one of the two women who was fired by Amazon for doing climate organizing before the pandemic - so she's a strong climate champion, Stranger-endorsed candidate. Maren Costa is in the low 30s and will probably go higher as more ballots come in this week. But Rob Saka is one of the two candidates who benefited from a independent expenditure by right-wing billionaires and corporate donors. The reason they targeted him in this race and Maritza Rivera in District 4, which we'll talk about in a moment, is they knew that those two candidates were struggling and needed that huge influx of cash to help convince voters to support them and not - maybe in this case - Phil Tavel over Maren Costa. So Rob Saka at 25% or so right now - it's not really a strong showing. Maren Costa in the low 30s - your progressive candidate, you'd like to be a little bit higher - she's in a great position right now. And one of the things you're seeing in this race - and you will see in the others - is in addition to the fact that the establishment candidates did worse than expected, in addition to incumbents doing well, you're also starting to see that a number of progressive candidates are surviving this supposed backlash that never actually happened. If you talk to or listen to Brandi Kruse, or watch KOMO, or read some of the more unhinged Seattle Times editorials, you would have assumed that coming into this election, there's going to be a massive backlash favoring genuinely right-wing candidates who really want to just crack down on crime, crack down on homelessness - that just didn't happen. What I see in District 1, and you'll see in all these other races, is a reversion to pre-pandemic politics between corporate centrists and progressive candidates. That's where you're starting to see the things shake out - you're not having right-wing candidates like Ann Davison getting traction. And candidates on the left, there weren't very many of them this year - had a little bit of traction, we'll see, in District 5, but otherwise it wasn't really a factor. So I think you're coming back to pre-pandemic politics where a progressive candidate like Maren Costa can do well in West Seattle. If you remember in 2015, when we first went to districts, the race in West Seattle was very close - Lisa Herbold only won by about 30 votes. Looking at the numbers in District 1 so far, I would not be surprised to see a very close race between Maren Costa and Rob Saka, but Rob Saka is not the strong candidate that his backers expected. And Maren Costa has a lot of momentum and energy behind her - in West Seattle, you're seeing voters responding to the message that she's giving. [00:05:06] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, I would agree with that. I also found it surprising to see how anemic the performance by some of those establishment moderate candidates - not only did they need that conservative PAC money to get through, but they were leading in fundraising by quite a significant bit - Rob Saka was far ahead of others in terms of fundraising, we saw the same in some other districts. So it was really interesting - it's hard to finish poorly in a primary or to not run away with the lead, really, in a primary when you have a significant fundraising lead - especially when you have additional money coming in. Seattle voters are starting to get a little wiser - still the challenge is there - but starting to get a little wiser at looking at whose donors are there and do those donors indicate how they're going to vote? Looks like in the history of Seattle politics - maybe drawing some conclusions on that. I think there are interesting conversations about the, whether this is a change election or stay the course election, whether people want something different or the same. And I think that's a more complicated answer than just change or different. One, we don't have a uniform city council. There's a range of positions and perspectives on the council, so to try and characterize it as "this progressive council" isn't necessarily correct. And now we're going to have a lot of turnover, we're going to see what this new composition is going to be, but it's hard to characterize that. And then you have the mayor on the other side - who is definitely a moderate, not a progressive there - and so the mayor is still dictating a lot of the policy in the city. Even some things that have been funded by the council, direction that has been moved has not been taken action on by the mayor. Saying that you want to stay the course really feels like a more moderate course these days, especially when looking at the approaches to public safety with a lot of criminalization of poverty - when you talk about homelessness and the outsize focus on sweeps, instead of trying to house people and connect them to services consistently. So that whole conversation is always interesting to me and feels a little bit reductive, a little too simplistic for what is actually going on. But we should probably talk about some of the other races, too. What did you see in District 2 with Tammy Morales and Tanya Woo, along with kind of an also-ran - another candidate who I don't think topped 5% - but that is a closer race than some of the others appear to be on their face, although there were a lot fewer candidates in this race. [00:07:34] Robert Cruickshank: Again, we can think back to 2015 where Tammy Morales nearly beat the incumbent Bruce Harrell, losing by a little less than 500 votes. She won by a larger margin when the seat was open after Harrell stepped down in 2019. A lot of the sort of conventional wisdom from the establishment class is that Morales was in real trouble, but she's hovering around 50% right now. Tanya Woo's close - it'll be a close election in the fall, but you have to say that Morales has the advantage here. Incumbency does matter. We need to look at the maps, but I know that there's been a lot of frustration in the Chinatown International District with Morales and with City Hall more generally, but the rest of District 2 seems to still have confidence in Tammy Morales' leadership, and still willing to send her back to City Hall for a second term. The exception to that was in noticing that the closer I get to Lake Washington, the Tanya Woo signs pop up a lot more. The closer I get to Rainier and MLK, more Tammy Morales signs. That's a typical split in terms of the electorate in the South End, and I think it favors Morales. She's done a great job on a lot of issues facing the community, she's been there for the community. Tanya Woo is running a strong campaign - Woo is not a right-wing candidate, Woo is much more of a center-left candidate who is really close to the Harrell administration. And again, it'll be a close race. If you're looking for a backlash, if you're looking for a rejection of a progressive city council, you are not seeing it in District 2. Morales, I think, has the advantage here going into November. [00:09:01] Crystal Fincher: I would agree. Now, District 3, coming on the heels of our announced departure of Councilmember Kshama Sawant from the council, there's going to be a new councilmember here. This is an open-seat race. We see Joy Hollingsworth and Alex Hudson making it through to the general election. What's your take on this? [00:09:22] Robert Cruickshank: Joy Hollingsworth has probably hit her ceiling - she's pulling around 40% right now. If you look back - ever since we went to districts in 2015, obviously being on the ballot changes the dynamics - you can get some pretty liberal people who are - I don't know if I like the socialism, 'cause they could get close. And so there's at least, you would assume, 40 to 45% for a more centrist candidate even in District 3, but not much beyond that. And what you're seeing is that as more ballots come in, Alex Hudson's numbers are growing, and there are quite a few other really good candidates in that race who also split the progressive vote. Hudson will almost certainly unite that progressive vote. I think very few of those voters are going to go from someone like Andrew Ashiofu or Ry Armstrong or Alex Cooley over to Joy Hollingsworth - a few might. But I think Alex Hudson is going to have the advantage here going in to the November election as well. [00:10:15] Crystal Fincher: This is an interesting race. There are eight candidates in this race, one - so very, very crowded race - number of progressive candidates in here. So there definitely was some splitting going on. This is a bit different than some of the open seat races that we see where oftentimes there is a candidate who feels like they're carrying on the same direction or philosophy or policy stance as the incumbent, but the incumbent decided not to go anymore. And so there're oftentimes as well, the choice of maintaining the same kind of policy direction or going different. I don't think that's the case here. And also to your point that Kshama Sawant not being in this race - yes, some people see the socialism in question, but Kshama had the ability to motivate a whole entire squad of volunteers that blanketed that district. And so looking at the absolutely impressive ground game - we've talked about it before on the program - lots to learn from for Democrats looking at that and others at how to expand the electorate and really get people to turn out to vote is something that Kshama and her campaign did extremely well. There's a different dynamic here, and it's going to be interesting to see if one of these candidates can motivate and galvanize younger people to a degree that comes close to what Kshama did. It looks like that was not the case in the primary, probably - we're still fairly early in the returns, but turnout looks concerning, especially among younger people here. So the entire dynamic of that race in that district just feels a lot more different than some of the other ones. And so this is going to be an interesting one to follow. [00:11:50] Robert Cruickshank: I agree - you're right to point to Sawant's just political genius. Sawant is one of the most effective candidates, campaigners, and politicians we see in the City in a long, long time. She has a really strong ability to speak to a broad progressive base in Capitol Hill. And in District 3, she speaks well to renters and people who are lower wage workers - they know she has their back. Her campaign operation is one of the best the City has had. Talking to people who live in District 3 - they would report every time Sawant's on the ballot, they had Sawant organizers at their doors almost every day until they turned in their ballots. They got the work done. They were really good at that. And that is a infrastructure that is unique to Sawant. Sawant always wanted to turn that into a movement, into an organization - was never quite able to. And so none of the other candidates have built that yet. As you point out with turnout, they're going to need to. Alex Hudson, looking like the more progressive candidate in this race, is going to have to figure out how to build something close to what Sawant had without having the sort of once-in-a-generation political charisma and skills that Sawant had. Now, Hudson is a great candidate. Hudson has a lot of experience at City Hall, knows the policy well. But to actually win the election, they're gonna have to figure out how to build some of that momentum and movement going for her to make sure that she wins. My guess is Hudson probably gets around 53% in November, but she's gonna have to work hard for it. [00:13:19] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, she's gonna have to work hard for it. I will say a couple things. One, just on legacy, I guess, moving forward - absolutely galvanized the public. I have seen several people say - Out of everyone, I know that I can count on Sawant to represent my interests. That's important. If you have a voter saying that, they are a loyal voter - unless you do something completely out of character, they're gonna be there for you like you've been there for them. There are questions about how well Sawant worked with her colleagues. There's ongoing debate about leading on an issue and pushing for progress versus how much to try and work with, potentially compromise with colleagues. And Sawant was not one who led with compromise. And that is something that a lot of people admired. I've said over and over again that a lot of times, especially speaking with more moderate people, they seem to always view Sawant's election as a fluke almost - Oh, some other condition, some other thing helped Sawant get in and that's the only reason why - which I think is why you saw so much energy around the recall elections and her re-elections. But she represents that district - there is no getting around - the people voted for her on purpose. She's a good example of looking at some people in some positions and saying - Hey, just move forward. Obviously $15 an hour minimum wage started in SeaTac, but then Kshama certainly picked up that mantle for Seattle and said - We need to get this done. Probably without her very direct and overt support for that, $15 an hour does not happen in Seattle when it did, how it did. If you follow me online, I often ask for mail or feedback from people in different districts. And I will say I had a couple people in District 3 who consistently showed me the mail that they receive - a couple of them in some harder to find places, harder to canvass places who don't get many canvassers - even with Sawant, they definitely did, but not as much as some of the other ones. Alex Hudson's campaign team made it there to drop off lit, made it there to knock on some doors. So that was encouraging. I'm always a big fan of candidates getting on those doors, talking to their constituents, their neighbors directly. Alex Hudson did a better job of that in the primary. And so hopefully that is something that can be built on and expanded upon. Want to talk about District 4, which is another interesting result. We had, in this race, a different dynamic where there was one clear progressive candidate and then a number of different shades of moderate to conservative candidates. This race even featured a self-described climate skeptic - just a number of different perspectives on the center to the right. And here we had Ron Davis with a pretty strong finish, considering the split in this race - we're sitting right about 42% right now - and as we record this on Thursday morning. And then Ken Wilson not making it through the primary, Maritza Rivera making it through - both of those fundraised pretty significantly. Maritza, another recipient of some PAC support. So looking at this race, how do you see the primary? And then how do you see the general shaping up between Ron Davis and Maritza Rivera? [00:16:31] Robert Cruickshank: The corporate PAC for Rivera was key because I think there's recognition that without it, Ken Wilson probably would have come in second. Wilson had a strong base of support - he raised, I think, the most Democracy Vouchers in the city, Ron Davis quickly caught up. Wilson had a genuine popular base of support among the NIMBYs and right wingers in District 4, which there are many. That's why you needed the right wing billionaires and corporate CEOs to come in and help drag Rivera up into second place. Going into the fall, I wanna acknowledge that there are people out there who take a more skeptical view of what this means for progressives - like Erica Barnett, for example - arguing that this isn't actually that great for progressives, they're getting into the upper 30s, low 40s, but things could unite against them in the fall. And we can look back at 2021 and say - Yeah, that's what happened in the mayor's race. I was looking at the numbers earlier this morning. After all is said and done in the August 2021 primary, Bruce Harrell had 34%, Lorena González had 32%. It looked like it was a real horse race. It turned out that was almost González's ceiling - she got, obviously, a little bit more than that, closer to 40%, but not quite. And Harrell scooped up almost everything else. I don't think that's gonna happen in District 4 and I don't think it's gonna happen elsewhere. For a few reasons - one, I think the mayor's race is a unique animal - citywide. I also think 2021 was a difficult moment for progressives in Seattle - they hadn't quite figured out how to handle this backlash to defund, concerns about crime and homelessness. Candidates are starting to figure that out a lot better. So Ron Davis is a very smart campaigner. He has really sensible answers on the issues that resonate even with more older conservative voters. He's got a real upside. I also think there are a non-zero number of Ken Wilson voters who might go over to Ron. Ken sent out a really interesting mailer in the last week of the election with a bunch of check marks about different positions - designed to contrast Ken with Rivera, but a lot of the check marks are for Ron as well. And what Ken's campaign was saying is that Rivera is the insider - she's been inside City Hall for several years, corporate backing, establishment backing. Ron doesn't have that. And I think a lot of Wilson voters will see in Ron someone who's also not of the establishment. I wouldn't want to overstate that, but a wider electorate in the fall, Davis getting a few votes here and there from Wilson - he's got a shot at winning. [00:18:58] Crystal Fincher: That's a really important point. And the way these votes consolidate is probably going to matter in this race - looking at how they stack up, this is going to be a competitive race. This is not one where the primary winner is automatically going to be the general election winner. Overall, looking at just how this district has trended over the past decade - the district is unquestionably moving left, which is really interesting. This is one of the districts that had been reliably moderate to conservative for a long time. That's not the case - we would not have seen even over about 42% right now - this result would not have happened half a decade back. This is just a different place. I think that is what's informed some of the odd policy choices of people like Gerry Pollet, who has received a lot of backlash, but I think he was counting on the composition of the district as it used to be and not as it is today. There were rumors of him potentially getting in the city council race - there weren't rumors, they were confirmed, I think, by someone close to him. Looking at it, he no longer really fits the district or provided a contrast that people felt comfortable moving to to support a candidacy. So it's going to be also interesting to see how things progress with him after considering and not deciding to do local stuff and going there. But this will be an interesting race. This is going to be one where we might see more of a focus and highlighting on the role of these donors, the role of the corporate support, how close Maritza is to the current administration. If people want a change, that really doesn't seem to include Maritza at all. She would be the last person you'd vote for if you wanted a change. So this is going to be a really interesting race to follow. [00:20:45] Robert Cruickshank: Yeah, and it's an interesting race also because it is a chance for progressives to pick up a seat on the City Council. The assumption, as we talked about going into this election from the conventional wisdom centrist pundit classes, that progressives are going to get dealt a pretty harsh blow here - these results suggest that's not necessarily going to happen. And in fact - Ron running a really strong campaign - he could flip that seat for progressives. He's a really sensible candidate for that district as well. He's a dad in his early forties. He's run a small business. He's been active in his neighborhood association. He knows the district well. He's a really good fit there. A lot of those voters, as you've said, are not much more overtly conservative, Pollet, Alex Pedersen types. They're there, clearly. But a lot of younger families are going to be there - ready to vote in November. And of course, in November, which you don't have in August, is a UW student body that is on campus - that's something that is in Ron's back pocket that can really give him a significant boost in the November election. [00:21:48] Crystal Fincher: Absolutely agree. We could change when we have this primary. We could change how we have this primary, frankly, and change our style of voting. We can move to even-year elections as the county has done and has voted to do. Why are we voting in August when people are away for the summer, when younger people are gone? [00:22:09] Robert Cruickshank: Yeah, to move up to where I live in District 5 - talking about what happened here - those changes would have made a huge difference. Ranked choice voting here would have gone a long way because we had quite an interesting field that didn't necessarily match what you see elsewhere. There isn't an obvious centrist-Harrell candidate. Cathy Moore seems closest to that, but she's also not the City Hall insider. Cathy is a much more traditionally liberal candidate, someone who sits between progressive and center - got around 30-something percent of the vote, not a huge showing. There were a number of progressive to genuinely left-wing candidates up here in the far northern reaches of Seattle, which 10 years ago is considered one of the most conservative parts of the city. We're seeing that's not necessarily the case - you have Tye Reed, who jumped in almost at the end of filing, presenting a very left-wing perspective. Christiana ObeySumner jumping in - they present a also-left perspective and appear to be the second place candidate - backed by, of course, a Stranger endorsement - narrowly edging out Nilu Jenks, who is a much more traditional progressive candidate running strong on climate issues. Nilu's campaign fell just short. I know that a lot of Nilu supporters are really frustrated at the way the Stranger handled this race. It is an example of where a ranked choice system, or having this in an even-numbered year, or having the primary at another time rather than at the dead of summer, could have produced a really interesting and fruitful conversation between these different candidates and campaigns about what it means to be progressive, especially up here in a part of the city that is often overlooked or neglected. I know the South End really has a pretty significant, legitimate beef on that front - but so does Lake City, so does Broadview, so does the far northern reaches of Aurora Avenue once you get past Green Lake. So it's gonna be interesting to see how this plays out here. I don't think that the race between Moore and ObeySumner is going to resemble races in other parts of the city. They're much more interesting and unpredictable candidates. [00:24:05] Crystal Fincher: It's too close to officially call right now, as of pre-drop on Thursday - we have Christiana ObeySumner at 22.1% and Nilu Jenks at 19%. It's hard to see this shift change. It's hard - as I'm looking at it, what I bet - that Christiana's the one that makes it through, I'd say that's likely. Would I say it's absolutely conclusive, we don't need to consider any more drops? No. But odds are, with the way that votes typically shake out, that this isn't going to change radically. There are a few different left candidates. It's not like there's consolidation to just one candidate. And because Christiana also got The Stranger endorsement, which a lot of late voters are relying more heavily on - they already don't have a formed opinion - so it's hard to see the vote shifting away from Christiana. As we look at this race in District 6, which does have an incumbent, Dan Strauss, who is over 50% - 50.7% right now, followed by Pete Hanning at 30%. This is another one where the moderates didn't seem to get a great bang for their buck. [00:25:17] Robert Cruickshank: And this is a race where it's clear that - one, the power of incumbency still matters. And two, the supposed backlash to the progressive city council is overstated. Dan Strauss getting above 50% is a big deal. He voted, I think, once for defunding the police in the summer of 2020, and then fairly quickly walked that back. But that didn't stop his opponents from sending a bunch of mailers to houses in District 6, explaining that Dan Strauss had voted to defund the police. That doesn't appear to have hurt him at all. The fact you have Pete Hanning, who is head of the Fremont Chamber of Commerce, small business guy - you would think that he would be a ideal candidate for that part of the city. It turns out he's not. He's languishing there at 30%. Strauss is above 50% before even more progressive ballot drops happen on Thursday afternoon and Friday afternoon in the dead of August summer. We're learning a couple things here - not just the power of incumbency, not just the fact the right wing backlash doesn't exist - we're also learning that Ballard and Fremont are more progressive than people assumed. It'll be interesting to see the map of where these votes come in. The Magnolia portions of the district, anything on the water, on the Sound, probably voted for Hanning or other candidates like that. Where the population base is - in Ballard, up to Greenwood, Fremont - I bet they're probably voting for Dan Strauss. And I think it is a endorsement of Strauss's attempt to straddle the fence. He gets a lot of criticism, I think justifiably so, for the way he flip-flops often. But appears to be working for Dan Strauss. Progressives have a bit of work cut out for us. I posted about this on Twitter - got a lot of people responding to me that Strauss is not a progressive. I would agree with that, but he's willing to listen to and vote for progressives if we organize him correctly. So I see it as an opportunity here. And also just the fact that the right-wing backlash didn't show up in this district at all is, I think, a big win. And I think it's a significant sign going forward that progressives have more of an opportunity than we thought. This race in particular reminds me of 2022. At the state level and especially the federal level - going into the November election, there was a lot of concern, worry, even predictions of doom that the Democrats were just gonna get wiped out. That didn't happen at the state level. In fact, Democrats picked up seats. At the federal level, barring a meltdown of the Democratic Party in New York State, Democrats could have held onto the House. They did hold onto the Senate. And I think you're seeing something similar here - that this assumption, I think, especially from the establishment media and that pundit class that - Oh, this is a center-right country, maybe a centrist city - it's not true. There is more support for a progressive agenda in the city, and in this country than is assumed. I think progressives need to internalize that and realize we have real opportunities here to move forward. And if we're making sure that we're listening to what voters are saying and bringing them along with us. [00:28:09] Crystal Fincher: That's a really important point. A lot of times people talk about - People are dissatisfied with the council, people think things are on the wrong track. Sometimes we use things like progressive and moderate - these broad labels - as a shorthand for policy. If you look at policy in practice in Seattle, it's hard to call a lot of it progressive on the issues that have been plaguing Seattle the most - on public safety, on homelessness, on issues of inequality. Policy has not been what progressives would call progressive. Moderates love to call things progressive. Moderates are extremely emotionally invested in being called progressive. And what we've seen is policy passed by those moderates with messaging calling it progressive - we've seen sweep after sweep after sweep, hot spot-focused policing, which doesn't seem to accomplish much in the longterm. And so when we just ask - Are you satisfied? And someone says - No. Somehow it's always characterized as - Well, people don't like progressive policy and they want something different. Or we're characterizing the council as progressive, which is not a clean label for that council - it's a lot more varied than that. And saying - Clearly, they want more moderate policy. And that's not true, especially in the City of Seattle - some people want to go to actual progressive policy and are thinking that - Okay, I hear this rhetoric, but I'm not seeing it in practice. I want what they talked about. I want what they're selling. That's also why you see so many candidates - who people who aren't moderate would call moderate, who progressives would call moderate - mirroring progressive messaging. Even though they're getting support from some really right-wing people, some people who traditionally support Republicans, are very opposed to taxation. Still, if you look at their mailers, if you look at different things - I'm a progressive champion. I believe in progressive policy. Sara Nelson ran on police reform. And you can see she was more aligned with her donors and different things - that's a lesson that Seattle is starting to learn. But just because there are some progressives on the council, a couple of progressives on the council, just because there's a label calling it that by people who most do not consider to be progressives - that's just a messaging trick. You have to follow up on that question - Why are you dissatisfied? Those answers are a lot more interesting and a lot more informative about why people are voting the way they are and why the reception to different councilmembers is the way that it is. [00:30:36] Robert Cruickshank: That's right. And I think it is going to be interesting to see who actually makes it onto the council because the fence sitters - we talked about one, Dan Strauss, we'll talk about the other, Andrew Lewis, in a moment. If there are other genuine progressives on the City Council - if we get people like Ron Davis and Maren Costa and Tammy Morales reelected, Alex Hudson elected - it becomes easier to pull those fence sitters in the direction of more progressive policy. We got to get them reelected. And this is where - you look at our last district here, District 7 - Andrew Lewis is ahead. He's in the low to mid 40% range. We'll see what happens over the next two ballot drops where he lands in the primary. It's good, it's not as strong as Dan Strauss. But Lewis, I think, understands what he needs to do to win and will do things that lead him down policy paths that progressives don't like. We saw this on Monday where - he signaled he would do this at the vote in June and he did - stood with Bruce Harrell to agree on a plan to pass the ordinance criminalizing drug possession in Seattle, incorporating the recently passed state law. And I'm not a fan of that ordinance, not a fan of that state law. I'm also not shocked at all that it played out here exactly the way it played out in the Legislature. Progressives and progressive-ish candidates and electeds said No, voted it down the first time. It came back. They won a few concessions, more money - but I think as Erica Barnett has pointed out, it's not new money. They won promises of diversion first, but they're promises - it's all going to be overseen by Ann Davison - we'll see what happens here. This is an example of Andrew Lewis trying to straddle the fence. And there's a political logic to that. Lewis won a very close race over former SPD chief Jim Pugel in 2019. It looks like he'll be up against Bob Kettle this year, who I think is running - clearly the strongest candidate of the people chasing Andrew Lewis, not surprised that Olga Sagan didn't really pan out - she got 14%, which is nothing to sneeze at. But again, the right-wing backlash is not real. We'll see what Andrew Lewis winds up doing. Lewis is someone who is clearly susceptible to being pressured by progressives - that's a good thing. I think those of us who are genuine progressives would love to see someone who's more progressive in that seat. We're not going to get that this year. It's not going to happen, nor in the District 6 seat. Most progressives I've talked to understand that and recognize that our interests are better served by the reelection of Dan Strauss and Andrew Lewis than by just abandoning them. Because sometimes you have to work with the electeds you've got - I think that's where it stands in those two districts. Lewis has a higher hill to climb than Strauss, but it's doable. We'll see how that plays out in the fall. [00:33:16] Crystal Fincher: Yep, I agree with that. I also want to talk about the school board races, which you have talked about, written about. How did you see this playing out? [00:33:24] Robert Cruickshank: It's interesting. The power of incumbency matters. There were two races on the ballot where there were genuine contests. District 1, which covers far northern Seattle - almost overlaps District 5 in the City Council - it'd be nice if these numbers matched. This is where Liza Rankin, the incumbent, is hovering around 60% of the vote - that's partly because she got the backing of The Stranger, it's also partly because she's the incumbent. It's also partly because - while there's a lot of discontent among parents in Seattle about the way the district is being run, that hasn't crystallized into any real organizing momentum yet. Rankin's main challenger, Debbie Carlsen, who is LGBTQ, has a LGBTQ family, has done a lot of work as an educator and nonprofit leader - Debbie's one of these candidates who files for school board during filing week - that is pretty common thing to happen and it takes you a little bit of time to get your feet underneath you as a candidate. Debbie's done that over the course of July, but a lot of the endorsement meetings were held in early June when she was still figuring it out - probably didn't give the greatest Stranger interview and is unusually closely allied with the current majority of the school board. Even if The Stranger had endorsed Debbie, Liza probably comes out well ahead. It's partly, again, the power of incumbency and the fact that a lot of voters just don't really know much about what's happening with the schools. That could change in a matter of weeks if the district does, as is expected, announce a list of schools they intend to close. That's the sort of thing that gets people's attention real quick. Similarly, you look over at District 3 where there's an opening - District 3 School Board overlaps District 4 City Council, so we're talking now about northeastern Seattle, Laurelhurst, Bryant, Ravenna, part of Wedgwood. That's a place where three really interesting candidates - Evan Briggs, who seems to have the most support so far at 38%, backing of The Stranger, backed by the incumbent majority in the school board. Ben Gitenstein, who's an interesting guy - running as a protest candidate, but has smart background in finance and understanding how districts work, backing of The Stranger - he's at 33%. Christie Robertson, I think, really ran a strong campaign - having the backing of Seattle Student Union, Seattle Education Association, MLK Labor, didn't get either of the newspaper endorsements, and I think that's why she's in a very close third place. That's a disappointment there, because I think she ran the best campaign she could, but coming in a close third. I thought she was the best candidate of the bunch. But August, where a lot of parents aren't paying attention - their kids are in camps or a lot of them are traveling. August also being a time of not great turnout. And people just don't know much about the schools - school board gets less coverage these days than it used to even seven, eight years ago. We'll see what happens in the fall if school closures are put on the table, with schools being named - that changes everything immediately. Now, it's also possible the school district recognizes this and wanting to protect their allies on the school board may punt that until after the election, which will merely infuriate everybody further. We'll see what happens in the fall. This is one of those where you see a 20% approval rating of the school district, but incumbency is a powerful thing. [00:36:31] Crystal Fincher: Incumbency is an extremely powerful thing. And one thing that we did not see in the King County Council races on the ballot was any incumbent in the race. There were two open seat races on the primary ballot. What was your take on those? [00:36:46] Robert Cruickshank: Unsurprisingly, Teresa Mosqueda doing very well in the District 8 seat - that's West Seattle, Vashon Island area. She's a great campaigner and is well-liked and well-respected. She won the city council race by 20 points in 2021, while Lorena González went down to defeat and Davison and Sara Nelson won. It's a clear fact that Mosqueda knows what she's doing - she connects well with the voters and she has a really strong record. Mosqueda has got a real clear advantage going into the fall. The District 4 seat for King County Council - we're talking about northwestern Seattle from roughly Queen Anne, Magnolia, up towards Ballard, Fremont, Greenwood - that's an open seat with a set of three very progressive candidates. Jorge Barón who's hovering around 50%, will be the clear front runner going into the fall. Sarah Reyneveld, who's at 30%. And then Becka Johnson Poppe, who had 20%. And that's gonna be interesting. Jorge, again, the clear front runner, but it's not a done deal by any stretch of the imagination. You had the other two candidates splitting the vote. I think Sarah has a really good shot of scooping up a lot of people who voted for Becka and that could be a very close race too. And I think this is one where - when you have two good progressives in a race, you want to see a good contest. You want to see them push each other to be better. You want to see them fight hard on key issues like who's gonna save Metro? The school district is talking about closing schools - Metro's talking about deleting routes. In a city this wealthy, that is this supportive of transit, that is this interested in doing climate action - for King County to be deleting routes is a huge problem. We need to be expanding the number of routes we have, the frequency on those routes. And so whoever of those candidates can really speak to the issues of transit in particular could have a real advantage going into November. [00:38:22] Crystal Fincher: I completely agree with that. The existing routes that are left is falling through the floor. I know people are calling them "ghost buses" just because of not showing up. People have bought cars that they can barely afford. But what they can afford even less is to not get to work on time, to lose the only source of income. They have to do better with Metro. I'm looking forward to that being discussed often and robustly in the general election. [00:38:49] Robert Cruickshank: We need to name it. Dow Constantine, King County Executive, is falling down at his job on transit. For most of the 2010s, he was seen as a leader on transit - he did good work to get ST3 on the ballot and approved for Sound Transit, he did good work getting more funding for Metro. But here in the 2020s, it's a different story. He has not provided the leadership or presence that we need to save these bus routes, to address their reliability concerns. This is unacceptable, right? For people to be going out and buying cars - we can't trust the bus system. In a city where we had more of our commuters riding buses than any other big city in America before the pandemic. Obviously the pandemic shakes things up - there are challenges recruiting and retaining operators, but it has to be a top priority for the King County Executive and right now it doesn't look like it is. And this city, this region, can't survive without strong transit. Our climate goals are never going to be met - transportation is the number one source of carbon emissions in our city and in our state. And that's why these King County Council races matter because we are not seeing the leadership we need to be seeing from the top. It's going to have to come from the County Council instead. [00:39:53] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, I agree with that. Both the executive and the council - because they had done the work to set it up, were just - Great, it's on autopilot and it runs. But there were signs of these shortages before the pandemic and the pandemic made it worse. And on the police side - Oh my goodness, there are shortages for police, we need to give bonuses, we need to give retention bonuses and recruitment bonuses and are doing everything we can - just a laser focus on these. I think a lot of people have noticed the lack of focus on so many shortages in so many other areas. From the school board perspective, the transportation situation, the bus drivers, a shortage there - just in so many areas, not having that kind of focus. This race in particular - speaking with a number of the candidates, they did say that they believe that we should be treating some of these other labor shortages with urgency and that we should consider the same kinds of bonuses - for example, transit drivers - that they have for sheriff's deputies, which I think would help. There needs to be active and involved management there - that's something that the council overall as a body needs to do a better job with. I hope this new injection of members with this election brings that about, helps to influence the other members. And I'm looking forward to a robust debate. The other thing about the Teresa Mosqueda and Sofia Aragon race that I thought was interesting was Teresa Mosqueda knew that helping renters, that helping small business owners, that helping people get affordable housing was an absolute critical need for Seattle. Even though at the time the conservative business interests were very opposed - they'll remain opposed, and that's an issue in this general election, that's motivating a lot of the conservative money in the race - she did it. It took a lot of know-how, it took a lot of budget smarts. And then ran on it. It's one of the most popular pieces of policy that has passed in Seattle in the past decade - it bailed the City out of this last budget cycle through the shortfall. Thank goodness that passed. Her ability to run on that and her expertise absolutely benefited her. On the flip side, Sofia Aragon, who's currently the mayor of Burien, who we've talked about before on this, is going through really a crisis in government. Recently there's another kind of letter of chastisement correcting errors in the record from the mayor and the deputy mayor in Burien, yet again, from the King County Regional Homelessness Authority. This is another candidate where their voter guide statement and their communication - defund has clearly failed. That's where people are at - people are tired of hearing people complain and just that reactionary backlash, and are looking for people who are engaged, and what's really going to help. What is really going to solve this issue? And what they really have not seen recently, especially with the mayor of Burien, is engagement and policy and solutions that will help. That hurt Sofia - for someone who is a mayor in a city that has a significant population in the district to perform so poorly. And someone who arguably is - certainly in Burien - better known than Teresa Mosqueda. That gamble just failed. Hopefully that's a reminder to stop the infighting, stop the one-upmanship focus thing there, the clique-iness that has happened there with the majority on that council, and to get to work just to focus on solving the problems that the people have. In Burien, there's money on the table that they can take to help that they're refusing - and we're going to pass another camping ban. And people want actual solutions, not just rhetoric and - We're going to drive them out of town. That's not where people are at, even in the suburbs. [00:43:21] Robert Cruickshank: I agree. It reminds me a lot of the LA mayor's race last year between Karen Bass and Rick Caruso, where Caruso's wealthy developer was betting that there'd be a huge backlash to visible homelessness and that he could ride that to defeat Karen Bass. And Karen Bass, being much smarter and a much better politician, understood no. Voters want to see solutions. They want to see candidates step forward and offer reasonable answers that are going to treat people who are in crisis humanely - 'cause that's what we should be doing anyway - and that will actually going to solve the problem. And I think that's what you're seeing in King County Council District 8 - Teresa Mosqueda comes along. Everyone knows she's reasonable, sensible, committed to the solutions, and wanting to get this done. Sofia Aragon is just grandstanding. There's not a path to victory, even in King County Council District 8, for right-wing grandstanding. Those results show that really clearly. [00:44:12] Crystal Fincher: I agree. Other results from around the region that I thought were interesting were the Tacoma City Council races. Looking at the Olgy Diaz race - Olgy making it through, I think that was expected - she is going through the general election, didn't have a primary, but in a strong position. Particularly looking at the results of the race with Jamika Scott making it through to the general election against a more conservative challenger. And an incumbent in that race getting 70% of the vote. This is a situation where, again, lots of people were prepared in Tacoma - it's not Seattle, there's absolutely going to be a backlash. They have had lots of conversations and consternation, like so many other cities, about how to address homelessness, how to address poverty, how to address public safety - a lot of controversies within that police department and reform that has been needed. How did you see these races in Tacoma? [00:45:08] Robert Cruickshank: They are really interesting examples of the same phenomenon we're seeing in Seattle. I know that Tacoma is different from Seattle - don't want anyone listening in Tacoma to think that we're implying they're the same. There are some similar trends. We are seeing in Jamika Scott's strong showing here in the primaries that there is a appetite in Tacoma for genuine, real, deeply progressive change. You're also seeing that some of the backlash politics aren't necessarily succeeding in Tacoma either. Another place that we're seeing interesting things play out is Spokane - we're just having a mayoral race this year. The incumbent Nadine Woodward is very much one of these - crack down on crime, crack down on homelessness, really picking fights with the state over visible homelessness. But Lisa Brown, former state senator, former head of the State Senate in the 2000s, is pretty much neck and in a really good position to knock off the incumbent mayor. Lisa Brown running - again, is a much more reasonable, not necessarily progressive candidate. I wouldn't say Lisa Brown's progressive, but much more traditional liberal candidate who wants to come in with sensible solutions. You're seeing all over the place - the right wing backlash is not necessarily either showing up, or performing very well, to polls. [00:46:15] Crystal Fincher: This is a situation where sometimes, especially in Seattle, we get very focused on progressive and moderate, progressive and conservative. I think because of where journalism has ended up and because The Times and Stranger are such consequential endorsements - and they typically are in a moderate, in a progressive lane - that influences how we look at and categorize things in policy. We're looking across the board in the state at every level of government - especially public safety, issues of poverty, issues of homelessness, being something that every jurisdiction has to manage. There are evidence-based solutions, and there are ones that aren't. It happens to be that the evidence-based solutions are usually those ones espoused by progressives. And the ones that are not, like doubling down on the War on Drugs, doubling down on so many things that have already failed - sweep after sweep, that just moves the problem and makes it worse and doesn't do anything to solve homelessness - that those are just failed solutions, that the data just isn't there. And so I think what we're seeing work in a lot of different cities - and usually what I focus on - is talk about the issue, talk about the solution. The label doesn't really matter to the average person on the ground. We're in politics, we talk about it a lot. The average voter is just sick and tired of hearing a lot of rhetoric and not seeing things change. They just want someone who will do something that has a shot at fixing the problem after doing the same thing over and over again and not getting great results. Even if a progressive is talking about - Hey, we need a Housing First model. That doesn't mean housing only model, but housing is necessary for those other things that may also be necessary - whether it's behavioral health assistance, whether it's assistance with substance use disorder, whether there are a variety of things - that housing is necessary for those other things to reliably work and to get this person stably housed again. That is what is working. And so it's evidence-based versus things that aren't. And we're putting these labels on them, but really it's about what is going to solve this problem. So many people in the establishment are so invested in the status quo, even though it's not working - hopefully they'll become more open to evidence-based solutions. If not, they're going to have progressive challengers and progressive candidates like Jamika Scott, who is winning the race in the primary right now at 38% over Chris Van Vechten, who is a more conservative challenger in Tacoma. We see Kristina Walker, the incumbent, who is proposing evidence-based solutions for a lot of these things at 70% - not looking at a backlash there. But also in Spokane - dealing with a lot of other issues - and I will say in a lot of areas, especially, Spokane has been a leader in the state on housing, has been a leader on the state in many issues. If you're looking at the progressive versus moderate conservative in policy and action, Spokane is looking more progressive than Seattle in a number of ways. A lot of Seattle suburbs looking more progressive if you're looking at how policy is traditionally talked about. So I really think that it's about who has a shot at actually fixing this problem. Voters have heard the other stuff for a long time and have seen it fail. That doesn't mean that every progressive candidate is automatically gonna be successful, but it does provide an opening. And I think that explains a lot of the backlash that people are expecting that did not turn up and translate. [00:49:36] Robert Cruickshank: I think that's right. And I think Erica Barnett doing a good job explaining that - yes, sweeps are popular in Seattle. That is true. And that's been true for a while. They're not true because people genuinely like sweeps. It's true because you ask voters to choose between doing nothing and a sweep - they'll pick the sweep because they want a solution. If you ask them to choose between a sweep and an actual solution - Housing First policies, permanent supportive housing, actually building housing that is affordable at all income levels - 9 times out of 10, they'll pick that. What the right-wing backlash folks were counting on is enthusiastic support for sweeps as the best solution. And that's not where the voters are at in this city at all, and I think you're seeing around the state, they're not there either. [00:50:19] Crystal Fincher: You mentioned before, which I think was very smart - two years back, four years back, candidates on the left and progressives were struggling to articulate that they were opposing sweeps or opposing criminalization of poverty and had a hard time breaking through because other people were maliciously mischaracterizing what they stood for. In order to get beyond that with people who have a lot of money to maliciously mischaracterize what you're doing was getting beyond the - No, we don't want to do nothing. We want to solve this thing. When we're advocating against sweeps, it's not like people are happy with encampments. It's not like people are happy with people living outside. We believe everybody should be housed. There are different solutions there. The answer is not nothing. We certainly heard a lot from Jenny Durkan, we heard from others - Oh, the alternative is nothing. They want to do nothing. When you have people attend your press conference every time you stand at a pulpit, that message is going to carry. What progressives are doing a better job of is articulating - No, we absolutely don't want to do nothing. We find crime unacceptable, and we actually want to do something to fix it. We find homelessness unacceptable, and we're tired of spinning our wheels and spending so much money and taking so much time to not improve the problem. We want to do different things that actually have a shot. That message is carrying through more, there are going to be a lot of competitive races - I don't know that that's going to carry the day, but certainly a more effective message this go around. [00:51:43] Robert Cruickshank: I think that's right. What these results overall show is that progressives have a real opportunity, but it's not a certainty. They got to use it effectively. [00:51:50] Crystal Fincher: Anything else that you think is interesting to look at on the electoral spectrum around the state? [00:51:55] Robert Cruickshank: One thing that is gleeful and a positive outcome is Semi Bird getting recalled along with two of his allies in Richland. Semi Bird is the right-wing, soon-to-be former school board director in the Richland Public Schools who tried to overturn the state's mask mandate - that led to a recall effort that has been successful. Bird is also a Republican candidate for governor in 2024 - it's pretty much him and Dave Reichert at this point. We'll see what happens. But seeing Bird get recalled in Richland, which is not a progressive hotbed by any stretch of the imagination, is another sign that this right-wing backlash is not as strong as folks thought it was. So we'll see what happens from there. [00:52:33] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, we will see what happens from there. And I wanted to mention that there are a lot of school board races that did not have more than two candidates across the state. Some races in the primary had Moms for Liberty candidates, aka people who are bringing in the desire to ban books, who are trying to overrule teachers and dictate what they can teach, and really attacking LGBTQ+ students - especially trans students - and really trying to bring hateful rhetoric and Christian nationalism into our education system. There's a Highline School District candidate that made it through to the general. There are others, like in University Place, several places across the state, that are going to have these general election match-ups with some candidates who are solutions-focused and others who are strictly running to basically sow chaos, is what it turns out to be in effect - to defund the schools, to strip standards-based education, fact-based education, to stop teaching history. They love what's going on in Florida, and they want to replicate what's going on there that is really hurting that state and community. I just want people to be aware that is a thing that is happening, and we can't afford to not be engaged in these school board races unless we want to provide a foothold for that kind of thing. Candidates that start on school boards wind up in city councils, in the Legislature, running for Congress. It is making sure that we're engaged in these very local races to make sure that we don't let someone in the door who's going to turn out to advocate for really fascist policies. [00:54:10] Robert Cruickshank: I think that's right. And we've seen Moms for Liberty candidates fail in Washington state before. We've seen some of them make it through. We saw a strong effort to try to repeal the state's new law that protects trans kids - they narrowly failed to make it to the ballot. So far so good - knock on all the wood that there is - that they're not getting more traction here in Washington state. They're working as hard as they can, and we have to work as hard as we can to push back against that. [00:54:33] Crystal Fincher: Absolutely agree. Wanted to wrap up with talking about the influence of endorsements in these elections. We've talked a lot about how consequential The Times and The Stranger endorsements have been over the past several years. I think there are a number of reasons why - I think that the thinning out of reporters covering government, covering politics on that regular beat is considerably less than it used to be, and that is impacting just how informed the public is in general on a regular basis - making these endorsements much more consequential. We also have fewer newspapers. And so those are just a couple of things making those much more important. The Stranger - looking last year - it had been at least a decade since a Stranger-endorsed candidate had not made it through a primary. The Times-endorsed candidate almost always makes it through also. So these have been and continue to be very consequential endorsements. How do you see this? [00:55:28] Robert Cruickshank: It's still the case that Stranger endorsement is essential if you're a progressive trying to get through to the general election. It confers more votes than The Times endorsement does. For those of us who are progressive, that's a good thing. It's also a double-edged sword. And you can see in Districts 3 and Districts 5 this year, some of the downsides of The Stranger endorsement. What it did is it winds up cutting off conversation, debate, and contests between the progressive candidates in the field. I like Alex Hudson - she'll make a great member of the city council. I also like the idea of seeing Alex and the other candidates in District 3, or Christiana, Tye, Nilu - the candidates in District 5 - really pushing each other hard to have to do a good job persuading progressive voters that they're the right one to carry the agenda forward. Instead, what seems to happen is Stranger makes their picks and that's the end of the discussion. You get a lot of - you alluded to this earlier - a lot of low-information progressive voters who wait until the very end, open their ballots, realizing - Oh my gosh, they're due, I've got to vote. What does The Stranger recommend? I'll vote that way. I get that. They're not stupid voters. They pay very close attention to federal politics, but they just don't know a whole lot about what's happening locally. And The Stranger is a trusted source. The Stranger is independent. They're not making endorsements usually based on relationship building. You have a clear agenda that you can trust, and they built that trusted brand over 20 years. But we have to start asking ourselves - I'm hearing more and more people asking the same question - Is it too influential? Is it too strong? Is it distorting the way campaigns are operating? Some of this is on The Stranger to ask themselves - do they want to be kingmakers or do they want to be the ones holding everybody's feet equally to the fire? I don't think you can always do both. It's also up to candidates and campaigns to figure out how do you overcome this? You can look around the country - there are lots of places in the country with strong endorsements, whether it's from an organization or an editorial board or whatever, but campaigns figure out how to get around that. I don't think progressive campaigns in Seattle have figured out how to win if The Stranger isn't backing them. I think it's time to try to get that answered - not as a slap at The Stranger, but it's unhealthy for one outlet to have that much influence. [00:57:36] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, I would definitely agree with that. I think that it is important just to have that conversation and cutting that off is problematic. The Stranger does a better job of actually trying to pin down candidates on answers and making it visible when someone is hedging. I think that's a very useful thing, especially in Seattle politics where lots of times people love giving a progressive impression - paint a rosy picture - Of course, I love trees and I love kids and all of that. And some people are satisfied with that, but we have to get to real specific policy answers - Would you vote yes or no on this? - to get an idea of who we're really voting for. I think The Times has really fallen down on that front. One important thing in races overall is just understanding where candidates do stand and where they're not taking a stand. And that is very predictive about how someone is going to vote and whether they're going to lean on issues, whether they can be pressured to taking a No vote on something that they may have indicated or given a nod to that they're broadly supportive of. So I hope we have robust conversations just about where candidates stan

Fotografka Eliška Sharp (dříve Kubíková) stojí za mnoha fotoeditorialy, které v průběhu času pro Nilu vznikly. Jak se jí daří v nové životní etapě na druhé straně zeměkoule - v Austrálii? Co obnáší práce svatebního fotografa a jaké tipy by dala nám všem, kteří chceme fotit v létě ?

On this week-in-review, Crystal is joined by Publisher of The Urbanist, Doug Trumm! The show kicks off with a rundown of The Urbanist's primary election endorsements, followed by discussion of a Federal Way shooting that raises lots of questions, the Burien council majority's continued failure on homelessness response, Ed Murray being spotted at political events, a court ruling that Seattle's primary encampment sweeps tool is unconstitutional, and a Mayor Harrell change of heart on South Lake Union light rail stations. As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com. Find the host, Crystal Fincher, on Twitter at @finchfrii and find today's co-host, Doug Trumm, on Twitter at @dmtrumm.   Doug Trumm Doug Trumm is Publisher of The Urbanist, where he has contributed as a writer and editor since 2015. He graduated from the Evans School of Public Policy and Governance at UW in 2019 with a concentration in urban policy. As a car-free renter living in Seattle, his policy focuses include improving transit and street safety and tackling the housing affordability crisis. His cat Ole is a national treasure.   Resources “Carrie Barnes, Chair of the King County Democrats” from Hacks & Wonks   “2023 Primary Election Endorsements” from The Urbanist   “The Stranger's Endorsements for the August 1, 2023, Primary Election” from The Stranger   “Seattle Times editorial board endorsements: Aug. 1, 2023, primary” from The Seattle Times   Endorsements from PubliCola   Progressive Voters Guide from Fuse WA   2023 Policing and Public Safety Voter Guide - Seattle City Council from People Power Washington   “Person killed during drive-by shooting in Federal Way, police say” by Lauren Girgis from The Seattle Times   “Burien still can't decide whether it'll take homelessness offer” by Anna Patrick from The Seattle Times   “After Refusing Shelter Offer from King County, Burien Proposes Camping Ban” by Erica Barnett from PubliCola   “Seattle Mayor Ed Murray announces his resignation on September 12, 2017.” by Nick Rousso from HistoryLink.org   “City's Primary Tool for Sweeping Encampments Without Notice Ruled Unconstitutional” by Erica Barnett from PubliCola   “Harrell Advances New Denny Station Options That Could Delay Ballard Link” by Doug Trumm from The Urbanist   “Transit Advocates Push to Save South Lake Union Light Rail Station” by Doug Trumm from The Urbanist   Ballard Link Extension: South Lake Union Stations Webinar #2 | Sound Transit   Find stories that Crystal is reading here   Transcript [00:00:00] Crystal Fincher: Welcome to Hacks & Wonks. I'm Crystal Fincher, and I'm a political consultant and your host. On this show, we talk with policy wonks and political hacks to gather insight into local politics and policy in Washington state through the lens of those doing the work with behind-the-scenes perspectives on what's happening, why it's happening, and what you can do about it. Be sure to subscribe to the podcast to get the full versions of our Tuesday topical show and our Friday week-in-review delivered to your podcast feed. If you like us, the most helpful thing you can do is leave a review wherever you listen to Hacks & Wonks. Full transcripts and resources referenced in the show are always available at officialhacksandwonks.com and in our episode notes. If you missed our Tuesday topical show, I chatted with Carrie Barnes, Chair of the King County Democrats, about how the county party engages in local elections and politics to improve lives in our area. Today, we are continuing our Friday week-in-review shows where we review the news of the week with a co-host. Welcome back to the program, friend of the show and today's co-host: Publisher of The Urbanist, Doug Trumm. Hey. [00:01:20] Doug Trumm: Hey, good to see you - thanks so much for having me. [00:01:22] Crystal Fincher: Very, very happy and excited to have you. And as we sit here, people have ballots at their homes - you should have received your ballot - if you haven't, you should pursue getting another one or tracking down where that is. But primary election is in full swing. The primary election end date is Tuesday, August 1st. And wow, there have been a lot of endorsements, including endorsements from The Urbanist. Who did The Urbanist decide to support in several different races? And what was the approach The Urbanist took to making these endorsements? [00:01:58] Doug Trumm: Yeah, we are excited to announce our slate. I'll, I guess, start with how we got there, which was a painstaking process - we've done it the same way, going back six, seven years. And that involves - first, the questionnaire to get people on the record about some issues important to urbanists and Safe Street advocates and housing advocates. And then after they've submitted their questionnaire, we invite them in for actual interviews that are now happening over Zoom - which has been convenient, I think, for everyone, since we're covering a wide area. We probably should have been doing this the whole time - save the candidates time and you get through more candidates. And it's about a 25-minute interview and you learn a little bit more - when you get a vague response in a questionnaire or some issue becomes relevant that maybe wasn't when you sent out the questionnaire. And then we debate what we felt about it. And luckily we didn't have any big fights this year, but obviously some disagreement. And I guess I can start with the Seattle City Council. We also endorsed in Bellevue this year, but where we endorsed, there's not a primary - so not the big fireworks that rolled that one out, but there will be more in the general. But we'll start in order. District 1 in Seattle - Maren Costa, we liked. She's a climate activist and clearly had the best housing platform. A slam dunk as far as what urbanists are looking for, I think, as some of the other candidates were much more wishy-washy about how much housing are they going to allow and how many ways are they going to allow to block it. Costa was pretty clear - I want housing. And then in [District] 2, we liked the incumbent, Tammy Morales. She's been the most strident Safe Streets advocate in the council, so we need someone like that 'cause it's very hard to get Safe Streets projects done. And her district is also in most in need of it, and she's been very clear about that. So it just seems like we need a strong voice, especially in that district. D3, we went with Alex Hudson. We thought she had the most policy chops experience - a lot of progressives in that race, but we thought Alex had the most ability to get it done. In D4, we liked Ron Davis. Didn't really seem to be anyone else who wanted the progressive mantle in that race, and maybe that's a credit partially to Ron Davis being a strong candidate. And we think he is really clear about where he stands and not very politician-y in that way, which is refreshing - was very clear about he wanted a lot of housing in the Comp Plan update that's due next year. Just to underscore that it's a really consequential election because that Comp Plan update is happening next year and a lot of big stuff happening next year, so definitely don't sit out this election. And Ron seems like the person clearly who actually believes in urbanism, believes in 15-minute cities, and things that can make it easier to get around the city as well. Competition just isn't very good. Then in D5, we went with Nilu Jenks. And that is interesting, right - so maybe I get your take on that rather than keep grandstanding here with our endorsements - but we liked Nilu a lot, but then it turned out The Stranger went with ChrisTiana ObeySumner, who we didn't get a chance to interview, otherwise we might have been so inclined potentially - just couldn't get that scheduled. So we ended up going with Nilu, who is pretty strong on most of our issues - was clear she was for housing abundance. And we didn't love some of her police takes, but we thought she was the best candidate we interviewed. And then The Seattle Times went with Cathy Moore. D5 is a weird race because Cathy Moore is now the de facto business chamber candidate, but there aren't as clear of lines. Did you have anything on that or should I keep going? [00:05:18] Crystal Fincher: I think you should keep going and I will chime in at the end. But I do agree that is a race with a number of very interesting candidates that I think are all worthy of looking into. And I think looking deeper into, particularly ChrisTiana ObeySumner and what they're doing is warranted. [00:05:36] Doug Trumm: Yeah, we're gonna continue to try to get that interview scheduled, so there's always potential in the general - it can be different. Also, who knows who's gonna make it through that primary, so it could be a very interesting field - there's a lot of candidates who have a decent shot. Tye Reed also has the Transit Riders Union endorsement and some other progressive endorsements, and is running probably farthest to the left. We wrote in our write-up that we liked Tye as well, but we just thought Nilu had the stronger chance in the general and also a little bit more of a bridge builder. Then moving on to D6, we went with Dan Strauss. We weren't terribly excited about it. He's been someone who's definitely tacked to the center and to the right. And his district has too, so maybe that's just survivalism, but we don't think those votes are good - I'm thinking of his recent vote that gave Ann Davison the power to lock poor people and drug users on the street. It just seemed like a forced vote - there wasn't actually a treatment plan and a diversion plan offered, but on pinky swearing - I don't know how you would take that pinky swear from Ann Davison. So that was a culmination of a continuing slide to the right, especially on safety. And he's been all right as Land Use Chair, but also has moved fairly slowly. But compared to Pete Hanning, his main competition, Dan's still clearly better so we went with Dan. And then D7, we went with Andrew Lewis. We thought Andrew Lewis and Dan Strauss were very similar - they both reflected as progressives and there was always questions about how progressive they really are, but I think Andrew's done a better job than Dan at defining himself and taking some brave votes here and there - he's been more accessible in explaining his waffles, rather than waffle-and-hide - I think that waffling is indicative of his kind of process to get somewhere. I'm not sure, always, what Dan's thinking. So we went with Lewis. The people running against Lewis also are all running pretty far right. It wasn't like there was someone who was gunning for The Urbanist endorsement in that race. But I think Lewis, as Chair of the Homelessness Committee, has done some good stuff and been very clear about trying to set up a alternate response and really hammering on that, so he's definitely worthy of a second term. We also endorsed in King County Council. One really hard race for us to endorse - because we had so many candidates we liked and we really went back and forth about how to do it - we ultimately decided not to do a dual. But in District 4 of the King County Council, which is Northwest Seattle, we went with Becka Johnson Poppe. And she works at King County now as a Budget and Policy Director, and that experience pushed her over the top for us. She's someone who already can hit the ground running. She knows this stuff inside-out and she has credibility - she is a progressive and has pushed on stuff. And one thing we're really watching on the King County Council is Metro Transit service - it's not where it was pre-pandemic, there's less frequency. And she's someone who's been clear about county-wide Transportation Benefit District, which could fund bus service and get us back to that pre-pandemic level eventually. Oddly, the King County Council's been dragging their feet on that and letting obstacles stand in the way rather than solve those obstacles, which is always frustrating to see. I think getting some new people in there, maybe they can take more of a problem-solving approach rather than - We can't get enough bus drivers, so I guess we're gonna accept mediocrity from our transit delivery. [00:08:32] Crystal Fincher: If that would have been a dual endorsement, who would have been the other? [00:08:36] Doug Trumm: Probably Jorge Barón. The vote didn't go that way, so I couldn't say for certain how it would have went. We liked all three candidates in that race, so I think it would probably have been Jorge - who got in late, but has an incredible record as far as leading [Northwest] Immigrant Rights Project. He's led that organization, has done incredible work. We certainly heard from him how he was going to apply that background to advocating for people of color communities in the county and understanding their issues better. And even though you're not gonna be determining that policy at the county level, you are doing a lot of policy that still affects people's livelihood. So liked Jorge Barón - he ended up getting The Seattle Times endorsement, he's pretty progressive for a Seattle Times endorsement. It might just be a reflection of three pretty progressive people in the race. Did The Stranger also go with Jorge? [00:09:19] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, he nailed what many candidates don't usually nail, which is getting both The Times and The Stranger endorsement. That doesn't happen that often, but when it does, it is usually a very encouraging sign for that candidate. But you're right, this is a race where there are only good choices. And so it just depends on your personal preferences and who you think can best carry out the vision - three solid candidates, each with impressive resumes and impressive experience. [00:09:49] Doug Trumm: Yeah, the third being Sarah Reyneveld, who got the Transit Riders Union endorsement, and I think a handful of labor endorsements. And has also been someone who's been active on transit issues - that countywide Transportation Benefit District, or other funding measures, to get the county back on track. Another open seat in the County Council in District 8, a more West Seattle-type area all the way to Burien and Tukwila. We went with Teresa Mosqueda, which was an easy choice for us, especially after her main competition - Burien Mayor Sofia Aragon - has been on this get-the-homeless-people-out-of-our-city-and-not-provide-services tangent now. So Teresa Mosqueda has been a great City Councilmember in Seattle, and obviously it'd be tough to see her go. She has a clear plan of how she's going to continue working on these issues at the county - transit, housing, healthcare, and childcare kind of being the pillars of her platform. And yeah, she's just someone who got a lot done, including JumpStart, which was the biggest step forward for progressive tax reform in Seattle in maybe ever. So I think that kind of resume is tough to beat. [00:10:49] Crystal Fincher: And that makes sense. There are a number of races for people to choose from this year - definitely going to be reshaping what the Seattle City Council looks like, with so many vacancies and so many open seats and new candidates that are going to be coming aboard. I think it's a solid group of endorsements. There are arguments that can be made for some other candidates in some of those races. I think District 5 is one of those where there are a number of good choices. You talked about Tye Reed, who was instrumental in the passage of social housing in Seattle - making that happen, getting that passed, and has been an organizer for a while around a number of different issues in the city. No one can question Tye's dedication to these issues and real personal investment - and making sure it can get better. We talked about ChrisTiana ObeySumner and Nilu Jenks, so we'll see how that race turns out - that's going to be another interesting one to check out. So we'll leave that there. We'll probably include links to other endorsing entities - just as you try to make up your mind as a listener and a voter - just to give you resources there to assist with those. Also want to talk about a number of other things, but we will go to this brief story about a drive-by shooting - evidently, sheriff deputies were on-site. There's not much that's been reported, and it really seems like the reporter dictated an initial statement from the police and didn't ask any questions. I'll read it to you, and then we can talk about it. Title - Person killed during drive-by shooting in Federal Way, police Say. A person was killed during a drive-by shooting while King County Sheriff's Office deputies were performing a wellness check early Saturday morning in Federal Way. Officers were attempting to check on the person seen behind a property in the 3900 block of South 320th Street shortly before 3 a.m. when two vehicles sped off and two shots rang out. Sheriff's spokesperson, Sergeant Eric White said the person was hit by gunfire and died at the scene. Deputies followed the two vehicles but they got away. No arrests had been made as of Saturday afternoon. Several businesses are located in the area of the shooting. That's the whole story. That's quite an interesting tale. What is your initial reaction to this, Doug? [00:13:16] Doug Trumm: Yeah, it's a head scratcher - have a story, we don't have a lot to go on. It tears down the mythology of what policing can do, especially with us rolling back our police chase limitations and letting police go hog wild in these chases again - at this past session at the State Legislature - because of pushback from the police lobbying forces. Theoretically, they were gonna do these chases and catch people exactly like this. They saw someone doing a drive-by shooting and they were in their cars, conceivably - this is the perfect time to do that chase. And yeah, it didn't work out, so it just underscores that using police chases is such a uncertain and certainly dangerous type of way to try to apprehend criminals when you can easily just ID the car and catch up with them later. And there's so many pedestrians and other bystanders that die in these chases - there really has to be a good chance of a good outcome, like some sort of win, to deal with that collateral damage. That's the first thing that popped into my mind. And the drive-by was apparently someone else. All these police press releases, reported with very little critical eye - when police are involved, they put it in passive voice and passive action. But because of that way they write the press releases, you wonder - Did the police open fire? Did they do anything? - we don't have that information yet. It was reported as a drive-by, so one would assume it wasn't just police opening fire during a wellness check. Were these people involved in the wellness check at all? - you end up with more questions than you have answers. In real-life situations, you realize there's so much that could go wrong. [00:14:42] Crystal Fincher: So many questions I have - a person was killed during a drive-by. Okay, so King County Sheriff's Office deputies were performing a wellness check. First thing, Federal Way has its own police department - doesn't contract with King County for its deputies. So these deputies, for some reason, responded instead of the Federal Way Police Department. Was it in response to a call? Who called it in? But they decide to go by themselves. Why were they on scene? So they were attempting to check out a person behind a property, they say, when two vehicles sped off and two shots rang out. I notice it doesn't say those shots came from the vehicle - it's vaguely worded and isn't useful, especially when there's so much that can be consequential, based on their characterization of what happens. Then the Sheriff's spokesperson said the person was hit by gunfire and died at the scene - I'm wondering if this reporter did anything but dictate this statement - did they ask anything about this? This is just a very vaguely worded statement. Deputies followed the two vehicles, but they got away. Again, this is a situation where even with the police pursuit law, they would have been able to follow them, but they said they needed a rollback to be able to catch criminals like this, and evidently that's not the case. What happened here? So no arrests have been made, no information has been shared that we've seen. What was the make and model of the car? Any description of the people inside the car? What came of that whole thing? There's no information. So if we take what they say at face value, what a spectacular failure in public safety. You have two officers on-site, and a person still gets murdered according to this account? All the excuses of they need more officers, they need more funding, we need to be able to have the officers nearby, on-site to protect people - there were two here, and they couldn't protect one person. How does that happen? Why does that happen? What was the situation? Was something missed? Did they not see people prowling in the area? What a failure. They assume that the shots came from this vehicle that killed this person. How do we not have a description of the car, a license plate, the people inside, any followup on that? Where does this case stand? None of that information provided. If police departments want to restore trust, if they want to have people work for them - those are the kind of answers that people want to see. Do people want to work for a department that can't stop a murder when two deputies are on scene, that can't apprehend a perpetrator when they have a zero-second response time and they can immediately respond? What is the purpose and utility here? And are they doing the work to figure out how to keep this from happening again, to figure out how to actually ensure safety? Unfortunately, too often that is not the case. And that's if you take everything just at face value here. It would be great to see some supporting information - some dash cam, body-worn camera video - just to see what happened, how this happened, and does the evidence match up with the narrative here? There is work that the Federal Way Police Department needs to do, that many departments need to do, and that the King County Sheriff's Office needs to do to rebuild trust within the community. [00:17:54] Doug Trumm: Why even run the story if you have so little information? It plays right into the police narrative. [00:17:59] Crystal Fincher: Yep, definitely a decision that The Seattle Times should dive into and ask themselves a lot of questions - about how this came to be published and what information they were relying on. Also wanna talk about the City of Burien and their continuing shame, really. The council majority deciding that not only do they wanna refuse the offer of shelter - the million dollars, 30-some odd Pallet shelters on provision, 100-ish parking spaces to backfill some space that a dealership was using. They are turning all that down and moving towards just a blanket camping ban in the city, which we've seen fail in so many other cities, but they are determined to do it themselves. This again is happening on a 4-3 council vote. The council majority, unfortunately, is winning this. What do you see happening here? What's your reaction to this, Doug? [00:18:57] Doug Trumm: Yeah, it's pretty sickening. I don't know that folks necessarily saw this coming. We saw some progressives elected onto the Burien City Council, so there was some hope that they were actually going to be looking towards making progress on this issue, doing things that actually work in the long term - rather than sweeping it under the rug and pushing it to other cities. But the four centrists on Burien City Council continue to hammer on this issue - they're not taking this offer of help that very few other cities in the region have, with so few strings attached, to a million dollars worth of housing for their homeless people. It's the type of thing that makes your head explode because - if you're mad about homeless people, having more roofs over the people's heads is the most direct way of dealing with that. And they had a million process complaints, like - Oh, what's gonna happen in five years or whatever? We're gonna be on the hook. It's just that type of thing that they wouldn't ask for any other offer of a million dollars from the county - suddenly they want a 20-year plan for this when they have no plan themselves. It's really, like you said, shameful. They've lost the majority of their Burien Planning Commission, as you've talked about in this podcast before, because of this move when the mayor decided to remove the head of the Planning Commission and then some other Planning Commissioners quit in protest. We all covered all that, but the one thing that's gonna happen if that commission continues to be unfilled is it's gonna slow down the production of housing in Burien - large projects have to go to that commission. If that happens, you're exasperating your housing shortage - they're creating the problem that they're complaining about. It's maddening, it's not treating these folks as human beings - I think it was Stephanie Mora referring that they should poop in doggy bags like they're dogs - it's clearly dehumanizing language. I think should be disqualifying for holding this office, but hopefully they lose their seats. For now, they're the people making policy for a city of about 50,000 people - it's crazy. [00:20:43] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, it absolutely is. And as you talked about, Mayor Sofia Aragon, Deputy Mayor Kevin Schilling, Councilmember Jimmy Matta have been part of making these decisions that are unconscionable. This is really a depiction of this soft, kind of progressive rhetoric with a wink and a nod. In previous statements, they had talked like - We definitely want to sweep, but we'll do it in a nice way, in a compassionate way, in the progressive way. But when it comes down to it, they really weren't interested in that at all. They just wanted to get people away and using very dehumanizing language. The real tell is - the place where they usually make an excuse and get away with it - We don't have the money. We don't have the resources. If we could, we would, but we just can't - we don't have anything, I'm sorry. So the only choice we have is to sweep because we just don't have the choice to do anything else. King County basically called that bluff and said - Okay, we've got a million dollars for you. We've got Pallet shelters ready to go. We've got a location that we can partner with. And hey, this dealership is gonna be impacted? We'll provide 100 parking spaces, which is larger than their inventory. - every objection, every excuse, every hurdle that they had was basically responded to by the county. And by the way, kudos to Dow Constantine and his office for taking a stance and for trying to constructively work with the City of Burien. There sometimes have been criticisms for Dow doing that in South County. He is doing it here. And Burien and the Council majority - they turned all that down. They could have already housed the people there. This would make a meaningful, visible, substantial difference in their situation overnight - once this is implemented - and they just decided not to. They're just looking for a ban. Bans are wholly ineffective, as the prior sweeps were wholly ineffective. And they just moved people from one location to another and making, as you said, the problem they're allegedly trying to fix even worse. This is just a continuing shame and negligence from the council. These people are their constituents - whether someone has a home or not, these are Burien residents - and their job is to help them and to serve them. And they refuse to do so. And it's shameful. It's pathetic. [00:22:59] Doug Trumm: Hopefully they come to their senses - this 4-3 split has been pretty durable. [00:23:03] Crystal Fincher: We will see what the primary elections hold. Sofia Aragon is running currently for King County Council against Teresa Mosqueda. I don't think anyone really expects Sofia to win this race. But it is really important to make sure people don't just rest on their laurels and sit on the sidelines. And even in this primary, even when it seems like one person is clearly more qualified than the other, you actually need to vote and make your own choice. [00:23:28] Doug Trumm: These are like conservative trial balloons - they're testing the waters - can Democrats get away with very conservative Trump-esque rhetoric, dehumanizing homeless people, pandering to cops in completely unaccountable ways? They want to see if that works. I don't know if Sofia is connecting these two - it seems like she would be when she declares for office for the King County Council race. But maybe her calculation is this makes her more popular. And I think it's really incumbent upon people who don't agree with that to actually turn out to an odd-year election, because it's validating that approach. And you're going to see more and more of it if people get rewarded for that. [00:24:05] Crystal Fincher: That's blatantly the calculation that they're making. Kevin Schilling has an opponent - Patricia Hudson - running against him right now, who is the progressive choice who is endorsed by King County Democrats. I mean, they received a very unusual letter of rebuke from the King County Executive's office, also from the 33rd District Democrats, which encompasses part of Burien. And the other part of Burien is the 34th, who also submitted an open public letter of rebuke. Anyone who calls themself a Democrat on record, locally, is outwardly opposing it. And it hasn't stopped them. In fact, they seem to be using that as cred. So this is important. These are still the people in office. They do need to be held accountable, and people need to make their voices heard. Another disillusioning development we've seen over the past couple of weeks is Ed Murray evidently popping up at political events around the region and definitely catching a number of people off guard. There seem to be some people who are okay with it. But just as a reminder - Ed Murray, former legislator, former mayor of Seattle, had to resign in disgrace as mayor of Seattle after credible allegations of molestation of underage people who were under his care and also potentially a family member. Also troubling was his response using someone's background against them - they were going through hard times as unhoused youth working with LGBTQ youth, who oftentimes very unfortunately are disowned by family, kicked out of the house, and left in very vulnerable positions - to then cite that vulnerable position as a reason why someone may not be believed was really victim blaming. The entire community, who has so many people who have been victimized - was a re-victimization to hear that. But he's been out of the public eye for a while and seems to be doing a soft launch to get back in. What's your reaction to this? [00:26:04] Doug Trumm: With someone like that who's had such a long political career, they don't start going to political events just for fun. They're plotting getting back into politics. He's clearly testing the waters here, seeing if he can get back into politics. He's seeing if he can get acceptance enough to the point where he can run for something again or be a campaign manager. I don't think it should happen. And it's also not a pleasant experience for folks who did have a negative reaction to his handling of that situation - making it very hard for his accuser to come forward because he was using the whole weight of his office against that person. That's not how you handle it if you're a leader - you don't victim blame. Luckily, he finally resigned, but he was going to hold on to that office with everything he had. [00:26:44] Crystal Fincher: I also think that's a low bar. It's wholly inappropriate for him to be in these. There's been no atonement. There's been no acknowledgment of what he's done. And while I don't believe in throwing people away forever, there has been nothing to indicate that he acknowledges what he's done, that he's attempted to make amends to his victims. In fact, that seems quite the opposite. He's just hoping to pick up where he left off. I think it is going to be really interesting to survey who is okay with him being at political events, and at their political events, and who is not - and what that says about different people as candidates. Who is finding this troubling and who is finding it just fine? I'm curious about where he does feel welcome and why, and what that says about those spaces. We will see how this continues to unfold throughout the city. And if you spot Ed Murray, shoot me a message. Also, a pretty significant court ruling this week came in about encampment sweeps, particularly about the City of Seattle - Seattle has been sweeping too broadly and is unconstitutional in its application. When there's clearly a risk to public safety or they are blocking completely a sidewalk, there is cause for encampment sweeps. But they've been doing it too much and for reasons that are too broad - they need to effectively offer shelter and provide shelter if they're going to sweep people. Without that provision of shelter, there's nowhere else for someone to go. It is illegal to say you can't exist here - in essence, you're saying you can't exist anywhere. And this court ruling was powerful with some pretty clear statements calling the current policy dehumanizing, destabilizing, and counterproductive. How did you see this? [00:28:31] Doug Trumm: The two individuals who brought it - their story was so tragic - they mentioned losing wedding rings, family heirlooms, because they've just been repeatedly swept while they're getting services or going to work or whatever. One person mentioned losing their work boots and then that jeopardized their employment and that sunk them deeper into the spiral of homelessness. They kept getting these last-second-notice sweeps because they were supposedly an obstruction. If the definitions are broad, they don't have anywhere to go. The ruling says the two main ways they were bending this rule is they were defining the blockages - 50% blockage, it becomes 100% blockage in their eyes, or even a 30% blockage - because some of these sidewalks in downtown are fairly wide. And unfortunately, some sidewalks in our city are pretty narrow. Often folks aren't trying to block the whole sidewalks. They're trying to go somewhere they can and not fear that their stuff's gonna get snatched up and taken away. They lost all these valuable possessions, including their wedding ring. What are we doing here? This cruel unusual punishment that rises to a constitutional violation and this judge issues this ruling. Now the City's gonna have to rethink how they do this. The other main way they avoid the Boise ruling, Martin v. Boise, is they say that anything in the park is an obstruction - because someone wants to use that particular part of the park, even if it's some secluded, say in the forest, in a large park when 99% of the park is still accessible. Part of Mayor Harrell's campaign pledges to clear the parks. Some of the parks are clearer than they were when he took office, but others still have encampments and it goes to this whack-a-mole approach of you're constantly chasing people around the city at great expense and great suffering to some individuals, like the two that brought the suit, and we haven't made durable progress. [00:30:11] Crystal Fincher: Another event this week with Sound Transit - Mayor Harrell is up for a Denny Station on West Lake Avenue again. How'd this happen? [00:30:19] Doug Trumm: Hey, I gotta give credit to grassroots organizers there - there's a lot of people involved. Seattle Subway sent, I think, over 6,000 letters via online petition. Uptown Alliance got a lot of letters because they were also very dismayed to see that the station on the eastern edge of their neighborhood was suddenly gonna disappear - at a whim - six, seven years into this process. And what was happening here, if you didn't follow this story, is there's gonna be obviously this new Ballard Link Light Rail line that will go from Downtown to Ballard. And on the way, it's gonna pick up Denny Triangle, it's gonna pick up South Lake Union, it's gonna pick up Uptown. And these were gonna be really high-use stations, but there's one problem in that some of the corporations and real estate interests in Denny Triangle were not excited about the station location. Folks like Amazon, Vulcan, were lobbying against this location because they didn't like the closure of Westlake Avenue, they said, which South Transit at this point in this process was estimating a full closure of four years. They're putting the station right under Westlake so they do have to mine it, it's gonna be closed for that part. But they realized that they could put decking over the top - they didn't propose that initially 'cause it's more complicated and expensive. But they realized they could do that, obviously, if the alternative is putting some station two blocks to the west, which is what the proposal that came forward out of this last-minute wrangling - wasn't in the DEIS, the draft environmental impact statement. So that means it requires more planning and process. So there's two public meetings online that Sound Transit is hosting - I think one of them is today and the other one is a couple of days from now - we can link to that in the notes maybe. But because this shifted-west alternative came forward late in the process, was proposed as a way to alleviate these concerns from corporations and real estate - they had to do this process. The mayor backed it at a meeting last month, I think it was, but then last week he walked that back. He said - You know what? We really need to keep the South Lake Union Station because what happens with shifting the station west is it gets super close to the other station on Aurora, which is a major bus artery. - so that's where a lot of people were going to transfer from bus to rail. And it would put you closer to Uptown too if you're headed to the eastern part of Uptown. So the shifted-west alternative consolidates the two stations into one. And that's what sort of set off all these alarm bells with Seattle Subway and Uptown Alliance and the urbanists and others that - Hey, why are we dropping a station? And they presented to Uptown Alliance - Sound Transit did two days ago, I think it was - and apparently the consolidating those two stations, they shared their ridership analysis, which was new information. It's gonna cost about 10,000 riders - someone who was at that presentation told me. And that's a pretty big deal - 10,000 daily riders. So the mayor didn't have that information last week when he made his statement - he said he was still waiting for ridership to confirm his decision, but he said he's starting to lean Westlake and just wants a good mitigation plan, which I don't know why we couldn't start there from the first place - because we're seeing across, especially the Ballard Link Station, that there's lots of changes that are happening because people don't like the construction period and don't think the mitigation plan is very good. And there may be something to that. The mitigation plan should be really good, but rather than focus on the mitigation, we've been just tossing around all these different ideas and extending the - what that means is you have to do a whole new study and that delays the whole project. So maybe small progress there on the Denny Station decision - we can focus on how to do that right and get a good construction mitigation plan, rather than last-minute options that are un-vetted and are going to require another year or two of study. [00:33:51] Crystal Fincher: And with that, we thank you for listening to Hacks & Wonks on this Friday, July 21st, 2023. The producer of Hacks & Wonks is Shannon Cheng. Our insightful cohost today is Publisher of The Urbanist, Doug Trumm. You can find Doug on Twitter @dmtrumm, that's two M's at the end. You can follow Hacks & Wonks on Twitter @HacksWonks. And you can find me on all platforms - Bluesky, SPILL, Twitter, all of them, Mastodon - @finchfrii, that's two I's at the end. You can catch Hacks & Wonks wherever you get your podcasts - just type "Hacks and Wonks" into the search bar. Be sure to subscribe to get the full versions of our Friday week-in-review shows and our Tuesday topical show delivered to your podcast feed. If you like us, leave a review wherever you listen. You can also get a full transcript of this episode and links to the resources referenced in the show at officialhacksandwonks.com and in the podcast episode notes. Thanks for tuning in - talk to you next time.

Hejże! W dzisiejszy piątkowy poranek wjeżdża dawka Gierkowa, a w niej:

Dr. Ann Mari Fjaerra, senior scientist and meteorologist working 20 years at the climate and research institute NILU in Norway with satellite data/earth observation, ground based air quality monitoring and climate change. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A 10 min bedtime random episode where Nilu helps Acha get deeper into the amazing world of K-pop and Blackpink. 100% sleep guaranteed:)

Réecoutez le club FG de Nilu du dimanche 9 avril 2023 

Telewizory zaatakował grzyb. Szycha na tiktoku myśli o tym aby spaść ze schodów w kasku dooma. Odradzamy. Z newsów Tomb Raider w Amazonie, 15 lutego Animowany Najlepszy Batman na HBO. Ale bez dubbingu podobno. Znachor Remake. Wraca Invincible. Gran Turismo. Z tematów dłuższych Ubisoft, cięcia i moje boje w The Division 2. W przerwie “pianinko”, czyli Hi-Fi Rush. Będziemy oglądać “Shrinking”. Z nowych gier: Dead Space Remake od EA Motive. Jest lepszy dym, sypiące się iskry i więcej latania. Potem trochę plotek i tona kontentu na Canal+. Hunters 2 z Alem Pacino oczywiście. I oni łowią nazistów. W tym sami wiecie kogo! Natomiast dla dzieci po Glass Onion, Morderstwo w Orient Expressie i Śmierć na Nilu. Polecam. Na koniec dużo o magii Naughty Dog oraz oczywiście The Last of Us. Gry i serial. Ja wybuchłem miłością :) Kolejny fajny odcinek, jestem dumny. Wstępniak. (05:25) Newsy, dużo o wszystkim i niczym Tematy główne. (16:40) Ubisoft i The Division 2 (19:10) Przerwa na Hi-Fi Rush (21:52) Znów The Division 2, a Massive jest z Malmo (31:15) Dead Space Remake (37:50) Smutny koniec Justina Roilanda (39:50) SAS: Rogue Heroes (42:20) CANAL+ w tym Kruk (45:55) Hunters 2 (48:20) Kryminały z dziećmi (51:50) Magia Naughty Dog (53:00) The Last of Us (2013), Part II (2020) (55:30) The Last of Us [HBO Max] O nas więcej, tu też wszystkie linki! https://www.ahasuper.pl Fajnie? Niefajnie? Napisz do nas! ahasuper@ahasuper.pl Współpraca reklamowa: info@digitalaudio.pl Gdzie nas słuchać? https://anchor.fm/bartosz-drozdowski Gdzie nas oglądać? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY-f3wl2gnKh6BQUwVAxeAA Aha Super na fejsie, https://www.facebook.com/Aha-Super-110323034498724 Aha Super na insta! https://www.instagram.com/ahasuper01/ Music by Lukrembo, “Bread” https://soundcloud.com/lukrembo #drozdowski #szychowski #ahasuper #podkast #podcast #lifestyle #seriale #filmy #komiksy #gry #kultura #dzieci #rodzina #giełda #btc

Advent marks the anticipation and preparation of what is yet to come.

Termin „apoftegmaty” odnosi się do zbiorów anegdot, sentencji, jak mówili Grecy – logoi, „słów” Ojców Pustyni. Nie jest łatwo zdefiniować czym są apoftegmaty, gdyż wielka jest ich różnorodność, choć nie mamy wątpliwości, że stanowią jeden rodzaj literacki. Odpowiedź Ojca (apoftegmat w zasadzie jest ze swej natury odpowiedzią na konkretne pytanie) może ograniczać się do kilku sylab, może na nią się składać sentencja, lub opowiadanie o jakimś wydarzeniu rozrastające się do opowieści, jak mówiono niegdyś, „budujących”. Były one przeznaczone przede wszystkim dla osób niemających doświadczenia w życiu ascetycznym lub dopiero debiutujących na pustyni; miały im przekazać zbiorową mądrość środowisk monastycznych, służyć radą, umocnić w momentach zwątpienia. Stały się tekstami normatywnymi obok Biblii, gdyż mnisi egipscy bardzo rzadko posługiwali się regułami. W apoftegmatach umieszczano sugestie na temat godnego mnicha zachowania w kwestii pożywienia, snu, monastycznej etykiety. Apoftegmaty pozwalały zachować w pamięci postacie sławne, ważne, godne podziwu, które powinny służyć za modele... / Prof. Ewa Wipszycka, fragment publikacji "Drugi dar Nilu, czyli o mnichach i klasztorach w późnoantycznym Egipcie" Apoftegmaty Ojców Pustyni czyta: Franciszek Wytych OSB / Fot. Borys Kotowski OSB

Termin „apoftegmaty” odnosi się do zbiorów anegdot, sentencji, jak mówili Grecy – logoi, „słów” Ojców Pustyni. Nie jest łatwo zdefiniować czym są apoftegmaty, gdyż wielka jest ich różnorodność, choć nie mamy wątpliwości, że stanowią jeden rodzaj literacki. Odpowiedź Ojca (apoftegmat w zasadzie jest ze swej natury odpowiedzią na konkretne pytanie) może ograniczać się do kilku sylab, może na nią się składać sentencja, lub opowiadanie o jakimś wydarzeniu rozrastające się do opowieści, jak mówiono niegdyś, „budujących”. Były one przeznaczone przede wszystkim dla osób niemających doświadczenia w życiu ascetycznym lub dopiero debiutujących na pustyni; miały im przekazać zbiorową mądrość środowisk monastycznych, służyć radą, umocnić w momentach zwątpienia. Stały się tekstami normatywnymi obok Biblii, gdyż mnisi egipscy bardzo rzadko posługiwali się regułami. W apoftegmatach umieszczano sugestie na temat godnego mnicha zachowania w kwestii pożywienia, snu, monastycznej etykiety. Apoftegmaty pozwalały zachować w pamięci postacie sławne, ważne, godne podziwu, które powinny służyć za modele... / Prof. Ewa Wipszycka, fragment publikacji "Drugi dar Nilu, czyli o mnichach i klasztorach w późnoantycznym Egipcie" Apoftegmaty Ojców Pustyni czyta: Franciszek Wytych OSB / Fot. Borys Kotowski OSB

Termin „apoftegmaty” odnosi się do zbiorów anegdot, sentencji, jak mówili Grecy – logoi, „słów” Ojców Pustyni. Nie jest łatwo zdefiniować czym są apoftegmaty, gdyż wielka jest ich różnorodność, choć nie mamy wątpliwości, że stanowią jeden rodzaj literacki. Odpowiedź Ojca (apoftegmat w zasadzie jest ze swej natury odpowiedzią na konkretne pytanie) może ograniczać się do kilku sylab, może na nią się składać sentencja, lub opowiadanie o jakimś wydarzeniu rozrastające się do opowieści, jak mówiono niegdyś, „budujących”. Były one przeznaczone przede wszystkim dla osób niemających doświadczenia w życiu ascetycznym lub dopiero debiutujących na pustyni; miały im przekazać zbiorową mądrość środowisk monastycznych, służyć radą, umocnić w momentach zwątpienia. Stały się tekstami normatywnymi obok Biblii, gdyż mnisi egipscy bardzo rzadko posługiwali się regułami. W apoftegmatach umieszczano sugestie na temat godnego mnicha zachowania w kwestii pożywienia, snu, monastycznej etykiety. Apoftegmaty pozwalały zachować w pamięci postacie sławne, ważne, godne podziwu, które powinny służyć za modele... / Prof. Ewa Wipszycka, fragment publikacji "Drugi dar Nilu, czyli o mnichach i klasztorach w późnoantycznym Egipcie" Apoftegmaty Ojców Pustyni czyta: Franciszek Wytych OSB / Fot. Borys Kotowski OSB

Sudan ma w sobie wszystko - a może nawet więcej. Tutaj znajdziemy ślady starożytnego Egiptu, najstarszych królestw chrześcijańskich, jak i brytyjskich rządów kolonialnych. Tutaj niepodzielnie króluje islam, lecz pod powierzchnią kryją się dawne wierzenia i tradycje. Zwykle kraj ten jawi się nam jako miejsce zanurzone w konflikcie i przemocy - w tym odcinku poznacie Sudan od zupełnie innej strony. (Początek rozmowy: 19'49")

Termin „apoftegmaty” odnosi się do zbiorów anegdot, sentencji, jak mówili Grecy – logoi, „słów” Ojców Pustyni. Nie jest łatwo zdefiniować czym są apoftegmaty, gdyż wielka jest ich różnorodność, choć nie mamy wątpliwości, że stanowią jeden rodzaj literacki. Odpowiedź Ojca (apoftegmat w zasadzie jest ze swej natury odpowiedzią na konkretne pytanie) może ograniczać się do kilku sylab, może na nią się składać sentencja, lub opowiadanie o jakimś wydarzeniu rozrastające się do opowieści, jak mówiono niegdyś, „budujących”. Były one przeznaczone przede wszystkim dla osób niemających doświadczenia w życiu ascetycznym lub dopiero debiutujących na pustyni; miały im przekazać zbiorową mądrość środowisk monastycznych, służyć radą, umocnić w momentach zwątpienia. Stały się tekstami normatywnymi obok Biblii, gdyż mnisi egipscy bardzo rzadko posługiwali się regułami. W apoftegmatach umieszczano sugestie na temat godnego mnicha zachowania w kwestii pożywienia, snu, monastycznej etykiety. Apoftegmaty pozwalały zachować w pamięci postacie sławne, ważne, godne podziwu, które powinny służyć za modele... / Prof. Ewa Wipszycka, fragment publikacji "Drugi dar Nilu, czyli o mnichach i klasztorach w późnoantycznym Egipcie" Apoftegmaty Ojców Pustyni czyta: Franciszek Wytych OSB / Fot. Borys Kotowski OSB

Podcast: Kulturní rubrika Respektu o nových verzích a pokračováních kultovních filmů a TV seriálů

Podcast: Kulturní rubrika Respektu o nových verzích a pokračováních kultovních filmů a TV seriálů

Pred mikrofon smo povabili poročevalko Ingrid Kovač Brus, ki je spremljala 72. Berlinale. V Berlinu so v sredo že podelili nagrade, po dolgih letih pa so v tekmovalnem programu zavrteli slovenski film, Moja Vesna režiserke Sare Kern. Jurij Meden iz Avstrijskega filmskega muzeja v pogovoru s Tino Poglajen predstavlja svoja razmišljanja o ohranjanju in prikazovanju filma v času digitalizacije. Zbral jih je v knjigi z naslovom Kaj je kinoteka? Vas zanima, kaj igra v kinu? Gaja Poeschl, Muanis Sinanović in Petra Meterc ocenjujejo filme s sporeda naših kinodvoran: Kupe št. 6, Vrnitev v Reims (odlomki) in Smrt na Nilu.

Naiwność i głupota czy chęć pomocy? W najnowszym odcinku podcastu "Węglarczyk o serialach" Bartosz Węglarczyk, Piotr Markiewicz i Piotr Różycki dyskutują o filmie "Oszust z Tindera", który bije rekordy popularności na Netflixie. Seriale i filmy, o których rozmawiamy: (1:10) - "Nasza planeta" (NETFLIX) (2:00) - "Euforia" (HBO GO) (2:20) - "Słodko gorzki" (10:30) - "Oszust z Tindera" (NETFLIX) (17:20) - "Kim jest Anna?" (NETFLIX) (37:10) - "Futurama" (37:30) - "Władca pierścieni: pierścienie władzy" (Amazon Prime Video) (40:45) - "Moon Knight" (Disney Plus) (41:50) - "Śmierć na Nilu" (49:20) - "Monachium: W obliczu wojny" (NETFLIX) (53:20) - "Peaky Blinders" (NETFLIX)

On this episode of InvestinU, Grant Frerking, President of NILU meets with Dr Josh Axe, founder of Ancient Nutrition and Leaders.com to discuss leadership, play nutrition, and the next stages of the NIL process. Follow along our journey of educating and paving the new frontier of NIL on Twitter and Instagram @On3NilU.

Zjawiska niepojęte dla człowieka: burze, zaćmienia najłatwiej było tłumaczyć boskim gniewem. Aż tu w starożytnej Grecji znalazła się grupka ludzi, którzy pomyśleli inaczej. – Nazywali się Tales, Anaksymander, Anaksymenes. U nich po raz pierwszy w znanej nam historii ludzkości, pojawił się obraz świata, który nie podlega oddziaływaniu ze strony sił boskich, magicznych. Czytamy u Talesa z Miletu, że to nie bogowie powodują wylewy Nilu tylko, że jest to zjawisko naturalne – mówi w Radiu Naukowym prof. Wojciech Sady filozof nauki, historyk idei z Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. – Podane przez niego wyjaśnienie dziś uważamy za zupełnie nieudane, ale była to pierwsza tego typu próba – podkreśla.*Przygotowanie każdego odcinka to wiele godzin pracy. Jeśli podobał Wam się ten podcast – możecie mnie wesprzeć w serwisie Patronite. Dzięki! https://patronite.pl/radionaukowe *To właśnie Grecy uznali, że przyroda jest zamkniętą całością, podlegającą niezmiennym prawom. Była to rewolucja w myśleniu przynosząca bardzo konkretne odkrycia.Grecy przyglądają się na przykład, jak wszyscy na Ziemi, zaćmieniom Księżyca. Zamiast jednak widzieć w nich boskie ostrzeżenia, dostrzegają pewne prawidłowości. – Widzą, że Księżyc jest dokładnie po drugiej stronie nieba co Słońce. Ktoś w Grecji, nie wiemy dokładnie to, jest o tym tylko wzmianka w Korpusie arystotelesowskim, domyśla się, że na tarczę Księżyca pada cień Ziemi, a skoro ciemny obszar jest zawsze zaokrąglony, to jedynym wytłumaczeniem jest kulistość Ziemi. W ten sposób ją odkryto, około 300 lat przed naszą erą. Nikt tego poza Grekami tego nie zrobił – podkreśla prof. SadyI kto wie, czy nie polecielibyśmy na Księżyc kilka wieków wcześniej, gdyby Greków nie podbili Rzymianie, którzy cały ten intelektualny ferment zdusili. Do greckich pism, jak wiadomo, powrócono i przez stulecia bezkrytycznie uczono się z nich na uniwersytetach (na których nie prowadzono badań!). Zmieniło się to dopiero w czasach nowożytnej rewolucji naukowej, ale wszystko nadal działo się w oparciu o myślenie greckie. - Ta rewolucja, która zaczyna się wąskim strumieniem w XVI wieku to rewolucja, wyrastająca z odczytania na nowo, nie dogmatycznie, ale ciągle odczytania dzieł Greków. One stanowiły punkt wyjścia – podkreśla prof. Sady.- To co opracuje Kopernik to jest połączenie idei Arystarcha i idei Ptolemeusza. Pod tym względem Kopernik w ogóle nie jest nowatorem – zauważa filozof.W podcaście rozmawiamy o tym, jak to jest, że w genialnych, ale przecież nie nieomylnych Greków przez stulecia Europa była tak wpatrzona, że nie dostrzegano ewidentnych nieścisłości. Jest również o tym, jak ferment społeczny (rozwój mieszczaństwa), odkrycia geograficzne (poczucie, że nie wszystko już zostało powiedziane) i wynalazki (druk i pojawienie się licznych ilustracji), gruntownie przyczyniły się do nowej odsłony naukowego myślenia. Ta druga odsłona, szczęśliwie już nie przerwana, wywindowała ludzkość do współczesnego poziomu rozwoju.Podcast został nagrany w studio Copernicus Center Press w Krakowie, dziękuję możliwość skorzystania! A wszystkim polecam znakomite książki tego wydawnictwa. https://www.ccpress.pl/Więcej materiałów prof. Sadego znajdziecie tu: http://sady.up.krakow.pl/ i w kursach https://www.copernicuscollege.pl/https://radionaukowe.pl/https://patronite.pl/radionaukowe

The exclusive end of June 2020 episode 1-8-7 features tracks by Singularity, Nilu, DCarls, and…

رادیو بندر تهران | قسمت سی‌ام، ایده‌آل تپه | سیزدهم دی ۱۳۹۸ ‌ ‌‌این قسمت با حمایت «سامانه‌ی دینگ» منتشر می‌شود. ‌سایت دینگ: https://www.myding.ir ‌‌ برای از حمایت از ما، اگر داخل ایران هستید از طریق لینک زیر: www.hamibash.com/bandaretehran و اگر خارج از ایران هستید از طریق لینک زیر: www.paypal.me/payhamrah اقدام کنید. ‌‌ برای مشارکت ساخت کتابخانه در یکی از شهرهای زلزله‌زده‌ی کرمانشاه: ۶۲۱۹-۸۶۱۰-۳۸۵۳-۳۴۰۱ بانک سامان | محمدامین چیت‌گران ‌‌ استانبول را شهری خندان دیدم که مرغان دریایی‌ش نگهبان او هستند. اما چه کنم که لذت کامل این سفر با تو بودن تکمیل می‌شد. حالا بازگشته‌ام و استانبول را به بندر آورده‌ام. خاکش را ریختم پای گلدان تا هوایش را نفس بکشم. چایی دم می‌کنم و برای تو می‌نویسم و منتظر می‌مانم تا بالاخره چشم‌هایت را ببینم. چشم‌هایی که نشانه‌هایش را در استانبول یافتم. ا‌یده‌آل تپه منطقه‌ایست در قسمت آسیایی استانبول که یک هفته در آنجا زندگی کردم. ‌ در این قسمت آثاری از مرتضی برزگر، نیکزاد نورپناه، اورهان پاموک و ارغوان پورعلی را می‌شنوید و در نهایت قسمتی از نامه به عشق تریاکی تقدیم خواهد شد. ‌ موسیقی‌های استفاده شده در این قسمت: Sari Gelin - Cem Adrian ft Manus Baba Yağmurlar - Hüsnü Arkan Mavi Mavi - Ibrahim Tatlıses Kol Bastı - Barış Manço Istanbulda Son Bahar - Teoman Ah Istanbul - Sezen Aksu Istanbul - Ezginin Günlüğü Nilüfer - Cok Uzaklarda ‌