Podcasts about st lambert

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

Henri Thin, séminariste pour le diocèse de Paris, actuellement diacre à St Lambert de Vaugirard, à 28 ans, il sera ordonné prêtre le 29 juin prochain pour le diocèse de Paris. A la veille de son ordination, il raconte comment il a reçu son appel et revient sur son parcours de discernement.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

C'est en 2023 que la paroisse St Lambert de Vaugirard dans le 15e arrondissement de Paris se lance un défi : évangéliser par l'art. Ainsi nait le festiv'art chrétien. Du 1er au 5 mai prochain, l'évènement est de retour. Ateliers, concert, exposition... les propositions pour petits et grands, en lien avec quelques écoles catholiques, seront nombreuses. Isabelle Niel coordonne cet évènement, elle revient sur sa genèse et cette 2nde édition dont le thème sera "Choisis la vie".Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

This week we are continuing our 40 days with the Martyr's Lenten Series! Join us in saying this prayer each day: ST PETER'S CHAINS PRAYER: O God, Who caused St. Peter, the apostle, to depart, loosed from his chains and unhurt, loose, we beg You, the chains of our sins, and graciously keep all evils far from us. Bless us this Lent and give us the faith of the martyrs. We ask this in the mighty name of Jesus Christ. AMEN   + MONDAY: St. Jose Sanchez de Rio, Mexico 1900s + TUESDAY: St. Justin Martyr, 100s, Rome + WEDNESDAY: St. Lambert, 600's, France + THURSDAY: St. Lawrence, 200s, Rome + FRIDAY: St. Lorenzo Ruiz, Philippines, 1600s + SATURDAY: St.Lucy, 300s, Rome   We will be doing something special for Lent on the Catholic Sprouts Podcast. Join us for Lent with the Martyrs. Purchase this fun PDF guide and create a chain that will count down to Easter and remind you to strive to let God break the chains of sin and death this Lent. It's just $7--and your purchase is a GREAT way to support the Catholic Sprouts Podcast! https://shop.catholicsprouts.com/products/lent-with-the-martyrs-digital-download   Also, this Saturday we will be gathering inside the Clubhouse for our monthly Crafting Club! Join us for a simple but BEAUTIFUL watercolor crucifix craft.  Head here to log into the Clubhouse or join if you aren't already a member: https://catholicsprouts.com/join-the-clubhouse/        Check out the Catholic Sprouts Podcast ARCHIVES! https://catholicsprouts.com/podcast-archives/    Find fun, meaningful, faith-filled projects for your own family in the Catholic Family Resource Library. https://catholicsprouts.com/catholic-family-resource-library-signup/    Catholic Sprouts is a production of Spoke Street Media. For more great Catholic podcasts, check out spokestreet.com 

In today's episode, the Manager of Enjoy, a restaurant and entertainment center in Grand Bay, Mauritius Estelle St Lambert urges the government of Mauritius to offer incentives, particularly in the creative arts sector to help develop budding talents and also create employment opportunities for the youth in the island. Estelle believes Mauritius has an enormous potential to become an entertainment haven.

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

Père Emmanuel Vegnant, curé de la paroisse St Lambert dans le 15e, à propos de « Festiv'art » du 10 au 14 mai.

In this episode, the hosts dive into the science of smell & the odiferous side of the occult Why is incense such a popular offering? Does an oil's odour reflect its properties? And what on earth does a saint smell like?! This episode features four case studies across different traditions to explore the seemingly-ubiquitous - but surprisingly diverse - role of fragrance in the occult. You can also expect to hear about science of smell & how odour can interplay with cognition. smell ya later x REFERENCES - Brief summary: the science of smell! // Sell, C. S. (2006). On the unpredictability of odor. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 45(38), 6254-6261. - Amazing book on the chemistry behind perfumery // Pybus, D. H., & Sell, C. S. (Eds.). (1999). The chemistry of fragrances (Vol. 17). Royal Society of Chemistry. - Olfaction and memory - how odour interplays with PTSD & emotion // Vermetten, E., & Bremner, J. D. (2003). Olfaction as a traumatic reminder in posttraumatic stress disorder: case reports and review. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(2), 202-207. && Zald, D. H., & Pardo, J. V. (1997). && Emotion, olfaction, and the human amygdala: amygdala activation during aversive olfactory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(8), 4119-4124. - Tapputi, one of the world's first chemists (and perfume makers)! // https://arkeonews.net/the-3200-year-old-perfume-of-tapputi-the-first-female-perfumer-in-history-came-to-life-again/ - Odour in antiquity // https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/17556/GrantG.pdf - The role of scents in traditional Chinese religion // Habkirk, S., & Chang, H. (2017). Scents, community, and incense in traditional Chinese religion. Material Religion, 13(2), 156-174. - Osmogenesia & sensing the saints Saucier, C. (2010). // The sweet sound of sanctity: sensing St Lambert. The Senses and Society, 5(1), 10-27. && Harvey, S. A. (1998). St Ephrem on the scent of salvation. The journal of theological studies, 49(1), 109-128. - Amusing paper on 'oilers' with a lot in there about MLMs // Kieffer, K. G. (2021). Smelling Things: Essential Oils and Essentialism in Contemporary American Spirituality. Religion and American Culture, 31(3), 297-331.

La directrice du Centre jeunesse de la Montérégie, Suzie Roy, nous invite à participer au concert du 7 mai à la Maison symphonique de la Place des arts de Montréal, le 7 mai prochain. Des élèves de Durocher à St-Lambert y participeront, entre autres, à titre de musiciens. La musique de films québécois, principalement celle de Stéphane Venne y seront mises en vedette. Marie-Hélène Thibert et Lynda Johnson, entre autres, seront de l'évènement.  

Pascal Barthélemy, postulateur de la cause de canonisation d‘ Anne-Gabrielle Caron, jeune chrétienne toulonnaise, décédée en 2010 à l'âge de 8 ans des suites d'un cancer. A ne pas manquer : conférence le 10 février à 20H30 à la maison St Lambert 117 rue Blomet à Paris

42 élèves de l'École primaire Préville de St-Lambert devront l'an prochain fréquenter une école située à 2 km de là... à Brossard. Les parents disent avoir été mis devant le fait accompli. Madame Marie-Claude Morency qui a deux enfants fréquentant cette école fait partie d'un groupe qui a mis sur pied une pétition pour que le CSSMV  revienne sur sa décision. https://www.facebook.com/groups/3351759475140409

Opportunisme politique? Implication citoyenne? Le candidat défait lors de la dernière élection municipale à St-Lambert  recueille les dons pour mettre en oeuvre, entre autres , un mur vert sur les bords de la 132 et un réaménagement des berges à la hauteur de sa ville.

La chanteuse et animatrice Barbara Secours nous convie à un spectacle de Noël présenté au Club de golf de St-Lambert, le jeudi 22 décembre à 20h. Accompagée du NoName Big Band et du chanteur Hugues Surprenant, elle nous offrira des airs de Noël "jazzy". www.lepointdevente.com/billets/nonamebigband

Élu au conseil de ville de St Lambert, Loïc Blanquaert nous parle du tracé dont il a eu l'idée pour contrer les inconvénients de trafic pendant les travaux du tunnel. 

Une première année fort mouvementée pour madame Mongrain et son conseil. Elle répond à nos questions en toute franchise.

 Entretien avec Jade Grenier de la Clinique Les doigts de Fée à St-Lambert qui nous a parlé de son parcours et des services offerts par la Clinique ainsi que ce qui distingue celle-ci.

Deambuler dans les allées des salons et croiser un jeune homme au regard malicieux. Une discussion s'engage et là, petite claque 19 ans, un regard passionné et surtout un verbe haut. Si j'ai un coup de coeur pour la cuvée "la roche" un chenin sur schiste, je trouve que les Garnier font vibrer la Loire de belle manière. Le papa ancien sommelier s'est installé en 2002, Pierre est né en 2003, un vigneron bourré de talent qui a reussi le pari de faire des vins vivants, accessible et gourmand. Buvons modérément, libre et Alsace S'gilt  Tu peux aussi partager l'épisode en Story via Spotify ou en faisant une capture d'écran de ton app favorite. N'oublie pas de me tagguer pour que je repartage ton post ! Merci

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

Olivier est l'actuel maire de de St-Lambert, il se présentera également aux élections provinciales le 3 octobre prochain sous la bannière du Parti Conservateur du Québec. On relate son enfance dans la région de la Beauce, son escapade dans l'ouest pour jouer au hockey, ses anciennes compagnies et on remonte jusqu'à son poste actuel de maire et également sur sa probable future carrière de député provinciale.

Pascale Mongrain, mairesse de St-Lambert, revient sur la vente d'une partie du parc Préville pour y établir un CPE.

Benoît Huot, président du comité organisateur des Olympiques spéciaux de Longueuil, St-Lambert et Boucherville nous invite jusqu'au 15 à être de la fête.   www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.benoithuot.com/athlete http://www.olympiquesspeciauxquebec.ca/

Benoît Huot, ex-nageur paralympique, citoyen de l'agglomération de Longueuil , nous commente son intronisation annoncée en début de semaine et nous parle des Olympiques spéciaux de Longueuil, St-Lambert et Boucherville débutant le 13 juillet prochain, dont il assure la présidence.  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.benoithuot.com/athlete http://www.olympiquesspeciauxquebec.ca/ http://www.pantheondessports.ca/

Marc Boucher, directeur général et artistique du festival, nous explique comment retourner au spectacle en chair et en os. Vingt-deux spectacles présentés à St-Lambert, Varennes, Boucherville, Longueuil et Mirabel. De Monteverdi à Morricone. Du 27 mai au 19 juin.  #classica #marcboucher # www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.festivalclassica.com/

Marc Boucher, directeur général et artistique du festival, nous explique comment retourner au spectacle en chair et en os. Vingt-deux spectacles présentés à St-Lambert, Varennes, Boucherville, Longueuil et Mirabel. De Monteverdi à Morricone. Du 27 mai au 19 juin.  #classica #marcboucher # www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.festivalclassica.com/

Entrevue réalisée dans l'émission du matin avec la mairesse de St-Lambert, Pascale Mongrain concernant la fermeture, le jeudi 30 mars de l'Hôtel de Ville de l'endroit. Moisissûres, champignons, infiltrations. Rénover ou démolir? 

Notre chroniqueuse  Nathalie Boisclair nous parle de la partielle du 11 avril et des Jeux olympiques spéciaux de cet été.

Benoît Huot, ex-nageur paralympique, citoyen de l'agglomération de Longueuil , nous parle des Jeux paralympiques d'hiver qui s'amorcent à Pékin vendredi . Il sera à la télé de Radio-Canada de même que sur le web, jusqu'au 13 mars pour les décrire et les commenter. Retour sur l'injustice des primes offertes aux médaillé.e.s paralympiques, sur la trêve olympique /paralympique bafouée par les Russes de même que sur les Olympiques spéciaux de Longueuil, St-Lambert et Boucherville de juillet prochain, dont il assure la présidence.  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.benoithuot.com/athlete http://www.olympiquesspeciauxquebec.ca/

Benoît Huot, ex-nageur paralympique, citoyen de l'agglomération de Longueuil , nous parle des Jeux paralympiques d'hiver qui s'amorcent à Pékin vendredi . Il sera à la télé de Radio-Canada de même que sur le web, jusqu'au 13 mars pour les décrire et les commenter. Retour sur l'injustice des primes offertes aux médaillé.e.s paralympiques, sur la trêve olympique /paralympique bafouée par les Russes de même que sur les Olympiques spéciaux de Longueuil, St-Lambert et Boucherville de juillet prochain, dont il assure la présidence.  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.benoithuot.com/athlete http://www.olympiquesspeciauxquebec.ca/

Katina Diep, du service des nouvelles, fait un tour d'horizon des nouvelles administrations municipales de St-Lambert, St-Bruno et Longueuil. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/ https://stbruno.ca/ https://longueuil.quebec/fr/

Katina Diep, du service des nouvelles, fait un tour d'horizon des nouvelles administrations municipales de St-Lambert, St-Bruno et Longueuil. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/ https://stbruno.ca/ https://longueuil.quebec/fr/

La mairesse de St-Lambert commente l'embauche du nouveau directeur général et TDA/H chez l'adulte, stratégies et  techniques pour le gérer. Sujets: 1.Pascale Mongrain, mairesse de St-Lambert répond aux questions de Charles Gaudreau et du directeur des nouvelles, Henri-Paul Raymond. L'embauche du nouveau d.g. Jasmin Savard et le dossier de l'ancienne église anglicane sont au centre des discussions. 2. Ariane Hébert est psychologue et autrice. Elle nous parle de son livre "TDA/H chez les adultes, stratégies et techniques pour le gérer" qui vient tout juste de paraître aux éditions de Mortagne. Truc, astuces et compréhension du trouble... www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/ https://editionsdemortagne.com/produit/tdah-chez-l-adulte/

La mairesse de St-Lambert commente l'embauche du nouveau directeur général et TDA/H chez l'adulte, stratégies et  techniques pour le gérer. Sujets: 1.Pascale Mongrain, mairesse de St-Lambert répond aux questions de Charles Gaudreau et du directeur des nouvelles, Henri-Paul Raymond. L'embauche du nouveau d.g. Jasmin Savard et le dossier de l'ancienne église anglicane sont au centre des discussions. 2. Ariane Hébert est psychologue et autrice. Elle nous parle de son livre "TDA/H chez les adultes, stratégies et techniques pour le gérer" qui vient tout juste de paraître aux éditions de Mortagne. Truc, astuces et compréhension du trouble... www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/ https://editionsdemortagne.com/produit/tdah-chez-l-adulte/

 Concert de Noël de l'AOJM, l'Association des orchestres de jeunes de la Montérégie, le 18 décembre 2021 à l'Église catholique de St-Lambert. Le chef Georges-Étienne d'Entremont nous en parle.

La nouvelle mairesse de St-Lambert répond aux questions de Charles Gaudreau suite à la première réunion du conseil de ville du 22 novembre. Elle revient sur sa déclaration faite ce soir-là quant à la situation financière de sa ville. Contribution à l'agglomération, vieillissement des infrastructures, capacité de payer des résident.e.s.  info@fm1033.ça www.jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/

La nouvelle mairesse de St-Lambert répond aux questions de Charles Gaudreau suite à la première réunion du conseil de ville du 22 novembre. Elle revient sur sa déclaration faite ce soir-là quant à la situation financière de sa ville. Contribution à l'agglomération, vieillissement des infrastructures, capacité de payer des résident.e.s.  info@fm1033.ça www.jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/

Deux nouveaux collaborateurs, Steve Gagnon (ancien conseiller de Fatima /Parcours-du-Cerf) et Alexandre Cusson (ancien maire de Drummondville, ancien président de l'UMQ et ancien candidat à la chefferie du PLQ), analysent les résultats de Longueuil, Montréal, Québec , Brossard et St-Lambert.  #longueuil #catherinefournier #coalitionlongueuil #stbruno #stlambert #brossard #montreal #quebec  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com  

Deux nouveaux collaborateurs, Steve Gagnon (ancien conseiller de Fatima /Parcours-du-Cerf) et Alexandre Cusson (ancien maire de Drummondville, ancien président de l'UMQ et ancien candidat à la chefferie du PLQ), analysent les résultats de Longueuil, Montréal, Québec , Brossard et St-Lambert.  #longueuil #catherinefournier #coalitionlongueuil #stbruno #stlambert #brossard #montreal #quebec  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com  

1. Patrick Piché est directeur général du Centre de valorisation du bois urbain. il nous parle du projet-pilote qui consiste à ramasser après abattage, les billes de bois pour donner une deuxième vie aux arbres.  2. L'ancien nageur paralympique Benoit Huot est désormais président du c.a. des Jeux olympiques spéciaux qui se dérouleront à la mi-juillet à Longueuil, Boucherville et St-Lambert. Il nous explique de quoi il s'agit, dans un premier temps, et, par la suite, commente le retrait momentané de la compétition  du gardien du Canadien, Carey Price pour des raisons de santé mentale.  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://cvbu.ca/ramassage?fbclid=IwAR3pMzZ8Cb2KGe1LKYlTQVv1QcrQ6jZ1-syFQkKoYSVOgAdgzRORahIiVqY https://www.facebook.com/olympiquesspeciauxquebec/

1. Patrick Piché est directeur général du Centre de valorisation du bois urbain. il nous parle du projet-pilote qui consiste à ramasser après abattage, les billes de bois pour donner une deuxième vie aux arbres.  2. L'ancien nageur paralympique Benoit Huot est désormais président du c.a. des Jeux olympiques spéciaux qui se dérouleront à la mi-juillet à Longueuil, Boucherville et St-Lambert. Il nous explique de quoi il s'agit, dans un premier temps, et, par la suite, commente le retrait momentané de la compétition  du gardien du Canadien, Carey Price pour des raisons de santé mentale.  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://cvbu.ca/ramassage?fbclid=IwAR3pMzZ8Cb2KGe1LKYlTQVv1QcrQ6jZ1-syFQkKoYSVOgAdgzRORahIiVqY https://www.facebook.com/olympiquesspeciauxquebec/

Les quatre candidat.e.s à la mairie de St-Lambert, France Désaulniers,Pascale Mongrain,Vincent Trudel et Karl Villeneuve répondent aux questions d'Henri-Paul Raymond, du service des nouvelles du 103,3. Ils débattent par la suite sur les enjeux de leur ville. L'harmonie au Conseil de ville, la revitalisation du quartier St-Charles, le bruit au Parc Jean-Drapeau et les relations avec l'Agglomération de Longueuil font partie de cette confrontation présentée dans le cadre des élections municipales du 7 novembre prochain. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/fr/elections

Les quatre candidat.e.s à la mairie de St-Lambert, France Désaulniers,Pascale Mongrain,Vincent Trudel et Karl Villeneuve répondent aux questions d'Henri-Paul Raymond, du service des nouvelles du 103,3. Ils débattent par la suite sur les enjeux de leur ville. L'harmonie au Conseil de ville, la revitalisation du quartier St-Charles, le bruit au Parc Jean-Drapeau et les relations avec l'Agglomération de Longueuil font partie de cette confrontation présentée dans le cadre des élections municipales du 7 novembre prochain. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com https://www.saint-lambert.ca/fr/elections

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège

Viviana Ramon entrepreneure de TOC Lunettes, un distributeur de lunettes haut de gamme et d'accessoires optiques écolos recherche un assistant de marque pour supporter la direction des ventes. Tu es une personne futée, déterminée et bilingue ? Aimes-tu la mode et les produits écolos ? TOC Lunettes pourrait bien avoir un emploi pour toi ! Amuse-toi à tisser des liens tant à l'échelle locale qu'internationale à partir de nos bureaux situés au centre-ville de St-Lambert. -Possibilité de primes en dollars canadiens et américains ! C'est une période passionnante pour apprendre, s'impliquer et continuer à grandir ensemble ! Communique avec nous sur toclunettes.com dans la section contact. Richard Desjardins DG, 40 ans d'existence de la Maison des jeunes Kekpart de Longueuil, notre relève sur le marché du travail. Notre travail consiste à créer un lieu où les jeunes se retrouvent, échangent et peuvent demeurer en contact avec des intervenants signifiants. L'approche par projet est au cœur de notre organisme. Les intervenants se basent sur les talents, les rêves, les idées et les passions des jeunes et créent avec eux des projets à leur image, afin de vraiment les rejoindre. Liens et ressources de l'épisode : Maison Kekpart - Maison de jeunes à Longueuil https://www.toclunettes.com/?lang=fr  Alliance carrière travail ⋆ Passez à l'ACTion! (alliancect.ca) Claudine Lepage, Animatrice Direction Emploi : c.lepage@alliancect.ca Podcast : https://www.fm1033.ca/podcast_fm1033/direction-emploi/ 

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège

M. Gagné répond aux questions de Charles Gaudreau et d'Henri-Paul Raymond. À la suite de l'article paru dans le Devoir  du lundi 19 juillet, article qui pointait du doigt le CHSLD privé qui héberge 200 personnes. Hygiène déficiente, manque de soins sont quelques points traités dans l'enquête menée par la journaliste Stéphanie Vallet du quotidien montréalais. Une enquête du CISSS-Montérégie-Centre est en cours... 

1. Geneviève Landry, d'Entraide pour hommes, revient sur le douzième féminicide survenu au Québec à Contrecoeur. Comment déjouer notre impuissance, notre lâcheté de notre peur? Comment transformer notre société pour en faire un lieu bienveillant pour nos femmes, pour nos familles et pour nos hommes ? Des idées, des pistes de solutions. 2. Benoit Huot, le sympathique nageur paralympique de St-Lambert a été couronné athlète de la décennie au dernier Gala Sport Québec. Il revient sur cet honneur incroyable, sur ses combats et sur ses projets (politiques?) www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.entraidepourhommes.org www.www.benoithuot.com

1. Geneviève Landry, d'Entraide pour hommes, revient sur le douzième féminicide survenu au Québec à Contrecoeur. Comment déjouer notre impuissance, notre lâcheté de notre peur? Comment transformer notre société pour en faire un lieu bienveillant pour nos femmes, pour nos familles et pour nos hommes ? Des idées, des pistes de solutions. 2. Benoit Huot, le sympathique nageur paralympique de St-Lambert a été couronné athlète de la décennie au dernier Gala Sport Québec. Il revient sur cet honneur incroyable, sur ses combats et sur ses projets (politiques?) www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.entraidepourhommes.org www.www.benoithuot.com

Simplement Dupont, ce sont les meilleurs moments de l'émission Dupont le matin, au FM93 ! Voir https://www.cogecomedia.com/vie-privee/fr/ pour notre politique de vie privée

Un nouveau président pour la CDE de St-Lambert et Une rue, une salle un lieu à la mémoire de Michel Louvain à Brossard faut-il vraiment attendre un an? La Commission de toponymie du Québec éclaire nos lanternes... 1. Franco Parreira est désormais le nouveau président de la Corporation de développement économique de St-Lambert. Il nous parle de sa vision pour les prochaines années à la tête de l'organisme. 2. Chantal Bouchard est conseillère en relations médias et porte-parole à la Commission de toponymie du Québec. Elle nous parle de la Commission elle-même, de règles établies et nous donne des noms de lieux coups de coeur. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.comwww.saint-lambert.cahttps://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca

Un nouveau président pour la CDE de St-Lambert et Une rue, une salle un lieu à la mémoire de Michel Louvain à Brossard faut-il vraiment attendre un an? La Commission de toponymie du Québec éclaire nos lanternes... 1. Franco Parreira est désormais le nouveau président de la Corporation de développement économique de St-Lambert. Il nous parle de sa vision pour les prochaines années à la tête de l'organisme. 2. Chantal Bouchard est conseillère en relations médias et porte-parole à la Commission de toponymie du Québec. Elle nous parle de la Commission elle-même, de règles établies et nous donne des noms de lieux coups de coeur. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.comwww.saint-lambert.cahttps://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca

1.Louise Levac est directrice de la Société historique et culturelle du Marigot, elle nous parle, entre autres d'oeuvres d'art de Jordi Bonet qui se retrouvent au Cégep Édouard-Montpetit. Elle évoque également la présence, sur notre territoire de plusieurs autres oeuvres au Parc Michel-Chartrand et à la Bibliothèque Jacques-Ferron. 2.Mélissa Aubert, du service des nouvelles, s'entretient avec Pierre Brodeur, le maire de St-Lambert. Il nous explique les raisons qui font en sorte qu'il ne sollicitera pas de second mandat en novembre 2021..  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.marigot.ca www.saint-lambert.ca

1.Louise Levac est directrice de la Société historique et culturelle du Marigot, elle nous parle, entre autres d'oeuvres d'art de Jordi Bonet qui se retrouvent au Cégep Édouard-Montpetit. Elle évoque également la présence, sur notre territoire de plusieurs autres oeuvres au Parc Michel-Chartrand et à la Bibliothèque Jacques-Ferron. 2.Mélissa Aubert, du service des nouvelles, s'entretient avec Pierre Brodeur, le maire de St-Lambert. Il nous explique les raisons qui font en sorte qu'il ne sollicitera pas de second mandat en novembre 2021..  www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.marigot.ca www.saint-lambert.ca

The importance of Catholic education.

Sujet: 1. Cybèle Olivier, notre journaliste, s'est entretenue avec le maire de St-Bruno, Martin Murray qui dresse un bilan extrêmement positif des 14 semaines de marché de cet été. 2. Sur le même sujet, Magalie Masson, du service des nouvelles,parle avec Nathalie Lemieux, une des fondatrices du marché fermier du Vieux-St-Bruno. Elle est de l'OBNL À la fortune du pot. Le marché de cet été en était à sa deuxième année d'existence. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.organismes.saint-lambert.ca www.stbruno.ca

Sujet: 1. Cybèle Olivier, notre journaliste, s'est entretenue avec le maire de St-Bruno, Martin Murray qui dresse un bilan extrêmement positif des 14 semaines de marché de cet été. 2. Sur le même sujet, Magalie Masson, du service des nouvelles,parle avec Nathalie Lemieux, une des fondatrices du marché fermier du Vieux-St-Bruno. Elle est de l'OBNL À la fortune du pot. Le marché de cet été en était à sa deuxième année d'existence. www.info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.organismes.saint-lambert.ca www.stbruno.ca

  Sujet : 1. Daphné St-Louis-Ventura est chercheure à la Chaire Raoul-Dandurand de l'Uqam. Elle revient sur les résultats étonnants (et pas encore connus) de la dernière élection américaine. 2. Notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert s'entretient avec Max Dubois, promoteur du futur marché qui prend place dans l'ancienne église de la rue Elm. Où en est-on dans ce projet annoncé il y a trois ans. Liens : www.Info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.dandurand.uqam.ca

    Sujets: 1. Shirley Théroux est porte-parole de la Fondation de l'institut de gériatrie de Montréal, elle nous parle de ce défi lancé en septembre dernier, défi qui invite les Québécois à poser des gestes visant à briser la solitude chez les personnes âgées. Le tout devait converger vers la Journée nationale des aînés, le1er octobre, mais madame Théroux nous dira que l'invitation se poursuit. 2. Le conseiller municipal de St-Lambert, Loïc Blancquaert nous explique quelles sont les motivations qui sont amené à cosignataire une lettre ouverte dans la Presse du vendredi 25 septembre, aux côtés d'autres élus du Québec. La lettre demande plus de transparence dans nos administrations municipales. Liens Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca www.solidairesdesaines.com www.lapresse.ca  

    Sujets: 1. Shirley Théroux est porte-parole de la Fondation de l'institut de gériatrie de Montréal, elle nous parle de ce défi lancé en septembre dernier, défi qui invite les Québécois à poser des gestes visant à briser la solitude chez les personnes âgées. Le tout devait converger vers la Journée nationale des aînés, le1er octobre, mais madame Théroux nous dira que l'invitation se poursuit. 2. Le conseiller municipal de St-Lambert, Loïc Blancquaert nous explique quelles sont les motivations qui sont amené à cosignataire une lettre ouverte dans la Presse du vendredi 25 septembre, aux côtés d'autres élus du Québec. La lettre demande plus de transparence dans nos administrations municipales. Liens Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca www.solidairesdesaines.com www.lapresse.ca  

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

  Sujets: 1. Le député du Bloc québécois de Longueuil-St-Hubert, Denis Trudel, répond à nos questions, principalement dans le dossier des foyers toujours sans logement. 2. Sacha Parisella est citoyen de Greenfield Park, il parle son nom et au nom de citoyens déçus et choqués d'une décision de Robert Myles, maire de l'arrondissement et de son conseil, qui, dorénavant, interdisant les feux de foyers à ciel ouvert. Le groupe de M. Parisella reproche à M. Myle fils fils de consultation et de transparence dans ce dossier. 3. Nouvel épisode dans le psychodrame de St-Lambert: le maire Pierre Brodeur accepte de répondre aux questions de notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert. Liens Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca www.longueuil.quebec / 311 www.croixrouge.ca www.denistrudel.quebec Foyers feux extérieurs Greenfield Park Saint-Hubert est sur Facebook.  

Sujets: 1. Le député du Bloc québécois de Longueuil-St-Hubert, Denis Trudel, répond à nos questions, principalement dans le dossier des foyers toujours sans logement. 2. Sacha Parisella est citoyen de Greenfield Park, il parle son nom et au nom de citoyens déçus et choqués d'une décision de Robert Myles, maire de l'arrondissement et de son conseil, qui, dorénavant, interdisant les feux de foyers à ciel ouvert. Le groupe de M. Parisella reproche à M. Myle son fils de consultation et de transparence dans ce dossier. 3. Nouvel épisode dans le psychodrame de St-Lambert: le maire Pierre Brodeur accepte de répondre aux questions de notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert. Liens Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca www.longueuil.quebec / 311 www.croixrouge.ca www.denistrudel.quebec Foyers feux extérieurs Greenfield Park Saint-Hubert est sur Facebook.

Sujets: 1. Le député du Bloc québécois de Longueuil-St-Hubert, Denis Trudel, répond à nos questions, principalement dans le dossier des foyers toujours sans logement. 2. Sacha Parisella est citoyen de Greenfield Park, il parle son nom et au nom de citoyens déçus et choqués d'une décision de Robert Myles, maire de l'arrondissement et de son conseil, qui, dorénavant, interdisant les feux de foyers à ciel ouvert. Le groupe de M. Parisella reproche à M. Myle son fils de consultation et de transparence dans ce dossier. 3. Nouvel épisode dans le psychodrame de St-Lambert: le maire Pierre Brodeur accepte de répondre aux questions de notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert. Liens Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca www.longueuil.quebec / 311 www.croixrouge.ca www.denistrudel.quebec Foyers feux extérieurs Greenfield Park Saint-Hubert est sur Facebook.

  Sujets: 1. Le député du Bloc québécois de Longueuil-St-Hubert, Denis Trudel, répond à nos questions, principalement dans le dossier des foyers toujours sans logement. 2. Sacha Parisella est citoyen de Greenfield Park, il parle son nom et au nom de citoyens déçus et choqués d'une décision de Robert Myles, maire de l'arrondissement et de son conseil, qui, dorénavant, interdisant les feux de foyers à ciel ouvert. Le groupe de M. Parisella reproche à M. Myle fils fils de consultation et de transparence dans ce dossier. 3. Nouvel épisode dans le psychodrame de St-Lambert: le maire Pierre Brodeur accepte de répondre aux questions de notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert. Liens Charles Gaudreau: jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca www.longueuil.quebec / 311 www.croixrouge.ca www.denistrudel.quebec Foyers feux extérieurs Greenfield Park Saint-Hubert est sur Facebook.  

1. Philippe Richard Bertrand, notre entrepreneur branché commente l'actualité économique. Ce matin, Facebook et le Cirque du Soleil. 2.Notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert s'entretient avec le conseiller municipal de St-Lambert, Bernard Rodrigue. M. Rodrigue affirme être espionné par le maire de l'endroit, Pierre Brodeur. Liens  Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca

1. Philippe Richard Bertrand, notre entrepreneur branché commente l'actualité économique. Ce matin, Facebook et le Cirque du Soleil. 2. Notre journaliste Mélissa Aubert s'entretient avec le conseiller municipal de St-Lambert, Bernard Rodrigue. M. Rodrigue affirme être espionné par le maire de l'endroit, Pierre Brodeur. Liens  Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com info@fm1033.ca

Ouverture de l'émission avec Caroline St-Hilaire. Le regard de Varda sur l'actualité : Avec le masque qui sera maintenant obligatoire dans les transports en commun, comment le faire porter à ses ados ? Entrevue avec Pierre Brodeur, maire de Saint-Lambert : Une firme de sécurité embauchée par la Ville de St-Lambert a fouillé sans autorisation dans le dossier de crédit d'élus. Le maire réagit pour la première fois publiquement. Chronique de Joseph Facal, chroniqueur au Journal de Montréal : Une bataille pour l'âme du Parti québécois. Entrevue avec Shirley Théroux, chanteuse, animatrice et maintenant porte-parole de la Fondation Institut de gériatrie de Montréal : Elle est la voix de nos aînés québécois. Chronique de Mathieu Bock-Côté, chroniqueur au journal de Montréal : L'importance de la course au Parti Québécois. La thérapie de couple avec Maka Kotto et Caroline St-Hilaire : Histoires de déménagements : Garder ou non ses archives ? Grande entrevue avec Peter MacKay, candidat à la chefferie du PCC : On reçoit le leader dans la course à la chefferie du Parti Conservateur du Canada Peter MacKay. Chronique de Vincent Dessureault, animateur à QUB radio : Tik Tok bannit de l'Inde. Des hôtels qui ne changent pas les draps entre les clients. L'effet de l'alcool sur les fonctions cognitives. Une production QUB radio Juin 2020 Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Entrevue avec Pierre Brodeur, maire de Saint-Lambert : Une firme de sécurité embauchée par la Ville de St-Lambert a fouillé sans autorisation dans le dossier de crédit d'élus. Le maire réagit pour la première fois publiquement. Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

Boire un verre en période de stress, c’est pas si simple. Si l’alcool rime souvent avec convivialité en famille ou avec ses amis, pendant le confinement, notre consommation d’alcool change.Petit.e.s producteur.rice.s et cavistes eux aussi doivent faire face à cette période où l’alcool se vend différemment. Émilie, qui ne voit le verre qu’à moitié plein vous propose un épisode comme un guide de consommation de l’alcool pour peut être boire moins, mais surtout boire mieux ! Références entendues dans l’épisode Célia Créma est sociologue spécialiste des questions d'addictions et responsable des pratiques professionnelles au siège de l'Association Nationale de Prévention en Alcoologie et Addictologie.Le spritz est un cocktail alcoolisé à base de Prosecco, de Campari et d’eau de seltz. La Neumarkter Lammsbräu est une bière allemande biologique. Recette vénitienne de cochon au lait en cocotte est issue du livre Venise, recettes cultes de Laura Zavan. Le Valpolicella 2018 est un vin originaire de Vénétie. Clément, est caviste chez Cambuse situé au 43 quai de la Seine, 75019 Paris. Ils sont ouverts du mardi au vendredi de 17H30 à 23h, et samedi en continu de 11h à 23h. Le Chenin de Loire 2018Le Rosé gris du domaine Colin Le champagne Gamet Jo’, travaille pour le domaine Mosse à St Lambert du Lattay-Val du Layon. Le Bisou, vin rouge de la cuvée Mosse Doully est humoriste, après L’addiction c’est pour moi en 2018, elle joue au Point Virgule son nouveau spectacle, Admettons. Le Club QuarantäneL’Appart chez moi est un DJ set en vidéo tous les samedis soirs chez Barbara Butch, de 21h à 23H. Les questionnaires pour mesurer votre consommation d’alcool d’Alcool-info-service. Bouffons est une émission de Nouvelles Écoutes, portée par Émilie Laystary. Montée et mixée par Thomas Decourt. Programmation par Cassandra de Carvalho. Et coordination par Laura Cuissard avec l’aide de Clara Matet.

1.La mairesse de Longueuil, Sylvie Parent, est désormais sur nos ondes, tous les jours, à 8h 10. Ce matin : Ligne téléphonique pour aider les commerces de détail, lettre des élus municipaux à la ministre déléguée aux Transports et ministre responsable de la région de Montréal, Chantal Rouleau, retour de la construction domiciliaire au Québec et collecte de sang à l’armée Éric Sharpe à St-Lambert, les 22-23 et 24 avril .2. La chercheuse Daphné St-Louis Ventura, chercheuse à la Chaire Raoul-Dandurand, nous informe sur les manifestations américaines pour arrêter le confinement, réunissant des milliers de personnes, parfois armées, et, soutenues par le Président Trump.3. Michel Alexandre Cauchon, directeur général de la Fédération des centres d'action bénévole du Québec, nous explique ce que sera cette Semaine d'action bénévole du Québec.   Lienswww.Info@fm1033.ca ..Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.comwww.longueuil.quebec  greffe@longueuil.quebecAction bénévole : www.fcabq.orgwww.dandurand.uqam.cawww.hema-quebec.qc.ca

1.La mairesse de Longueuil, Sylvie Parent, est désormais sur nos ondes, tous les jours, à 8h 10, pendant la pandémie Ce matin : retour de certains services (garages, centres de jardinage, mines et construction domiciliaire) dans les prochains jours, collecte de sang sur rendez-vous à l’aréna  Éric Sharpe à St-Lambert la semaine prochaine, réajustements qutidiensnpour répondre aux demandes du gouvernement et présence policière pour éviter tout rassemblement.2. Second Harvest, et sa porte-parole Marie-Josée Mastromonaco, invitent les organismes d'ici à aller consulter leur site Foodrescue.ca pour bénéficier de l'aide gouvernementale de 4,5 millions $ en matière d'aide alimentaire.3. L'entreprise Orkan de St-Hubert, specialisée en filtration d'air (les systèmes Épurair), fabrique avec l'aide de la firme CCM des cagoules destinées aux soignants et soignantes dans nos hôpitaux. Simon Labrecque en est le vice-president; il répond à nos questions.Lienswww.Info@fm1033.ca ..Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.comwww.longueuil.quebec  greffe@longueuil.quebecwww.canada.ca/coronaviruswww.quebec.qc.cawww.epurair .comwww.foodrescue.ca (514 952-2071)www.hema-quebec.qc.ca

1. La mairesse de Longueuil, Sylvie Parent, est désormais sur nos ondes, tous les jours, à 8h 10, pour communiquer les principales nouvelles concernant la ville, ses bureaux et ses services en période de pandémie du covid-19. Ce matin, la ligne 211, Propage l'info, pas le virus et le calendrier de paiement des taxes municipales sera décalé d'un mois. 2. Le porte-parole des usagers du CHSLD Argyle à St-Lambert, Daniel Parent dénonce un projet pilote qui consiste à jumeler des chambressimples en y logeant deux personnes âgées. 3. Le porte-parole d'Hema-Québec, Laurent-paul Ménard, revient sur la demande du PM Legault à tous les Québécois, « Allez donner du sang! » pendant son point de presse du début de semaine. Il nous informe des répercussions de cette demande. Liens www.Info@fm1033.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.longueuil.quebec www.quebec.qc.ca www.hema-quebec.qc.ca

1. Charles Gaudreau s’entretient de nouveau avec Denis Trudel, député du Bloc Québécois pour Longueuil-St-Hubert qui a fait paraître dans les médias une lettre demandant aux sympathisants des autochtones qui occupent la voie ferrée depuis trois jours à St-Lambert de lever leur siège. Le militant d’autrefois est-il en contradiction avec le député d’aujourd’hui? 2. Diane Trudel et Charles Gaudreau parlent avec madame Rose Lévesque, poète et peintre qui reçoit les gens chez-elle dans sa maison –musée de St-Hubert, une dix-neuvième fois, pour célébrer la Journée des Femmes. Liens et ressources de l’épisode : Info@fm103,3.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.rose-levesque.com Denis Trudel est sur Facebbook.

1.Charles Gaudreau s'entretient de nouveau avec Denis Trudel, député du Bloc Québécois pour Longueuil-St-Hubert qui a fait paraître dans les médias une lettre demandant aux sympathisants des autochtones qui occupent la voie ferrée depuis trois jours à St-Lambert de lever leur siège. Le militant d'autrefois est-il en contradiction avec le député d'aujourd'hui? 2.Diane Trudel et Charles Gaudreau parlent avecmadame Rose Lévesque, poète et peintrequi reçoit les gens chez-elle dans sa maison –musée de St-Hubert, une dix-neuvième fois, pour célébrerla Journée des Femmes. Liens et ressources de l'épisode : Info@fm103,3.ca Charles Gaudreau : jcegaudreau@gmail.com www.rose-levesque.com Denis Trudel est sur Facebbook.

1- Dom Lebo, ancien batteur des Cowboys Fringants et ancien conseiller municipal de St-Lambert nous rend visite pour nous présenter sa démarche citoyenne : « Ma propre petite politique écoresponsable". 2- Carl Lévesque, à invité le conseiller municipal du secteur des Maraîchers, Jean-François Boivin à venir nous parler de cette déclaration de réduction de gaz à effets de serre qu'il désire présenter, de même que ces démarches pour aller chercher plus d’argent des gouvernements. 3- Isabelle Saulnier, termine son Top 20 des bonnes nouvelles en environnement vues de sa lorgnette de scientifique (elle est géologue et professeure de sciences au Cégep Édouard -Montpetit. Liens et ressources de l’épisode : www.fm1033.ca Isabelle Saulnier peut être rejointe sur la page Fabuleuse Terre sur Facebook. Domlebo est sur le web : Domlebo.com. Carl Lévesque peut être rejoint sur la page Carl Lévesque sur Facebook. Charles Gaudreau peut être rejoint par courriel au jcegaudreau@gmail.com Jean-François Boivin est sur Facebook. Longueuil.quebec

1.Le conseiller lambertois, Philippe Glorieux nous présente cette nouvelle politique qui répondait à un besoin. A mes côtés, François Bertrand Potvin de la Salle des nouvelles. 2.Rejet hier à St-Bruno-de-Montarville,pendant le Conseil municipal, du projet d'implantation d'un crématorium. Henri-paul Raymond, de la Salle des nouvelles, nous présente un extrait de cette séance. Liens et ressources de l'épisode : www.fm1033.ca

1. Le conseiller lambertois, Philippe Glorieux nous présente cette nouvelle politique qui répondait à un besoin. A mes côtés, François Bertrand Potvin de la Salle des nouvelles. 2. Rejet hier à St-Bruno-de-Montarville, pendant le Conseil municipal, du projet d'implantation d'un crématorium. Henri-paul Raymond, de la Salle des nouvelles, nous présente un extrait de cette séance. Liens et ressources de l’épisode : www.fm1033.ca

1.Pierre Brodeur, maire de St-Lambert, réagit a la rétractation et aux excuses du chroniquer David Leonardo, dans les pages du Journal hebdomadaire de St-Lambert. M.Leonardo à, à plusieurs reprises, tenu des propos qui ont poussé M.Brodeur à le poursuivre en justice. Entrevue menée par Henri-paul Raymond. 2.Entrevue réalisée par Cybèle Olivier sur le Grand Spin Don Rive-Sud en compagnie de madame Danica Bilodeau, agente de développement de la Société canadienne du cancer. L'activité se déroulera le 27 février 2020 à midi, au Igloo Motiv Entraînement, 1203, rue Marie-Victorin, Longueuil. Liens et ressources de l'épisode : www.fm1033.ca

1. Pierre Brodeur, maire de St-Lambert, réagit a la rétractation et aux excuses du chroniquer David Leonardo, dans les pages du Journal hebdomadaire de St-Lambert. M.Leonardo à, à plusieurs reprises, tenu des propos qui ont poussé M.Brodeur à le poursuivre en justice. Entrevue menée par Henri-paul Raymond. 2. Entrevue réalisée par Cybèle Olivier sur le Grand Spin Don Rive-Sud en compagnie de madame Danica Bilodeau, agente de développement de la Société canadienne du cancer. L'activité se déroulera le 27 février 2020 à midi, au Igloo Motiv Entraînement, 1203, rue Marie-Victorin, Longueuil. Liens et ressources de l’épisode : www.fm1033.ca

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

Description de l’épisode : 1er sujet : Réouverture de L’Échoppe des fromages, une nouvelle adresse, 205 rue St-Denis à St-Lambert. Une histoire de résilience et de solidarité. 2e sujet : L’augmentation du panier d’épicerie en 2020, les explications et le pourquoi. Ensuite comment économiser? Liens et ressources de l’épisode : Le site internet du FM 103,3: www.fm1033.ca

Opération Nez rouge Longueuil Rive-Sud Première partie : Marie-Claude Asselin Mme Asselin nous parle de l'histoire de L'organisation sur la Rive-Sud, pourquoi elle et son club de natation s'impliquent-t-elles chaque année? Elle nous informe quant à comment devenir bénévole et former des équipes. Les dons volontaires au bénévoles iront à deux équipes de natation cette année. Chroniques à l'émission de Bonheur le matin dès la fin novembre pour raconter les anecdotes du weekend Deuxième Partie : Michel DG du RTL nous entretientau nom de Pierre Brodeur, ambassadeur de la campagne 2019, président du RTL et Maire de St-Lambert. Pourquoi avoir accepté? Comment motiver les gens d'affaires, les entrepreneurs, ainsi que les inciter  à impliquer leur organisation dans Opération Nez rouge. Comment s'organise les raccompagnements lors des party de bureau arrosés Liens et ressources de l'épisode :  

Opération Nez rouge Longueuil Rive-Sud Première partie : Marie-Claude Asselin Mme Asselin nous parle de l'histoire de L’organisation sur la Rive-Sud, pourquoi elle et son club de natation s’impliquent-t-elles chaque année? Elle nous informe quant à comment devenir bénévole et former des équipes. Les dons volontaires au bénévoles iront à deux équipes de natation cette année. Chroniques à l’émission de Bonheur le matin dès la fin novembre pour raconter les anecdotes du weekend Deuxième Partie : Michel DG du RTL nous entretient au nom de Pierre Brodeur, ambassadeur de la campagne 2019, président du RTL et Maire de St-Lambert. Pourquoi avoir accepté? Comment motiver les gens d’affaires, les entrepreneurs, ainsi que les inciter  à impliquer leur organisation dans Opération Nez rouge. Comment s’organise les raccompagnements lors des party de bureau arrosés Liens et ressources de l’épisode :  

Episode 4: Busting Shroud Myths, Part 2:  In one statement, John Walsh (His book The Shroud) observed: “The Shroud of Turin is either the most awesome and instructive relic of Jesus Christ in existence ... or it is one of the most ingenious, most unbelievably clever, products of the human mind and hand on record. It is one or the other; there is no middle ground.”  I did a recent - July, 2019 - survey of Baptist Pastors on The Shroud of Turin. Of those that responded to the poll - only 3.5 percent believed that the Shroud was the genuine burial cloth of Jesus. Half of them were agnostic - it was an interesting historical artifact that could not be verified, and just slightly under half 41 percent - believed the Shroud to be a forgery. I did a much larger poll in The Astonishing Legends facebook group - a group of people that are quite open and interested in paranormal things. In that survey, 132 out of 350 - 38 percent - believed the Shroud to be a hoax, which is very similar to the Baptist pastor's percentage. However, there were more true believers in the paranormal group, with 37 out of 350 - 11 percent - believing that the Shroud was the genuine burial cloth of Jesus. Shroud agnostics - believing the Shroud to be interesting, but unverifiable - represented 181 out of 350 respondents, just over half at 52 percent. Therefore, based on my informal surveys of a little over 400 people - roughly half of those respondents are just like me - uncertain about the Shroud. Over the next few episodes of this podcast, we are going to cover the history of the Shroud of Turin, and the most modern research and findings. Maybe by the time we are done, we'll all still be Shroud agnostics, but maybe - just maybe - we will together unearth enough information to change our minds and develop a clearer and more definitive view of one of the most controversial and noteworthy artifacts of church history.   Today, we are continuing to bust some myths about the Shroud. Next episode we will present 10-25 arguments in favor of the authenticity of the Shroud, some arguments against it, and likely conclude this series. Myth: The Shroud has always been owned by the Catholic Church, and they have officially endorsed it. In fact, it appears that the Catholic Church did not have official possession of The Shroud until 1983 when the royal House of Savoy conveyed ownership of The Shroud to The Holy See. If you remember your AP Modern European History, you might remember that the Savoys began as a small ruling family in the Alps northwest of Italy proper, and grew to become the dominant royal family in Italy, reigning over the country from 1861-1946, and also briefly ruled Spain in the 1800s. Although the Catholic church does not have an official position on The Shroud, several Popes and other church officials have commented favorably about it, including: Cardinal Ratzenberger/Pope Benedict, who called The Shroud, “A truly mysterious image, which no human artistry was capable of producing. In some inexplicable way, it appeared imprinted upon cloth and claimed to show the true face of Christ, the crucified and risen Lord".” (This was said when Ratzenberger was a Cardinal, and was not said officially/Ex Cathedra, so it was not considered an official endorsement of the whole church. Pius 11, 1936, “These are not pictures of the Blessed Virgin, it is true, but pictures that remind us of her as no other can. Since they are pictures of her Divine Son, and so, we can truly say, the most moving, loveliest, dearest ones that we can imagine."   What a strange quote - am I wrong that it seems to be suggesting that pictures of Mary, mother of Jesus, would be more remarkable than pictures of Jesus, the son of God? When any theology places more attention, emphasis and weight on Mary than they do on Jesus, this is where I have a massive difference with them. Source of quote “The Shroud, a Guide” by Gino Morreto. (I note here that I can't find this quote by Pius 11 elsewhere) Pope John Paul II  "Since it is not a matter of faith, the church has no specific competence to pronounce on these questions," the late Pope John Paul II said in 1998. ALSO:  “The Holy Shroud is the most splendid relic of the Passion and Resurrection [of Our Lord Jesus Christ]. We become what we contemplate... Why don't we contemplate the Icon of Icons: The Holy Face of Jesus!" Instead of icons made by man, let us venerate the greatest icon of all: The Holy Face of Jesus!” and also, “The Shroud is an image of God's love as well as of human sin ... The imprint left by the tortured body of the Crucified One, which attests to the tremendous human capacity for causing pain and death to one's fellow man, stands as an icon of the suffering of the innocent in every age." Most recently, Pope Francis commented on The Shroud during his first Easter address: Dear Brothers and Sisters, I join all of you gathered before the Holy Shroud, and I thank the Lord for offering us this opportunity, thanks also to new devices. We do not merely “look” if we are looking at it, it is not a simple look, but it is a form of veneration, a look of prayer and also it is a way of letting him look at us. This face has eyes that are closed, it is the face of one who is dead, and yet mysteriously he is watching us, and in silence he speaks to us. How is this possible? How is it that the faithful, like you, pause before this icon of a man scourged and crucified? It is because the Man of the Shroud invites us to contemplate Jesus of Nazareth.  This image, impressed upon the cloth, speaks to our heart and moves us to climb the hill of Calvary, to look upon the wood of the Cross, and to immerse ourselves in the eloquent silence of love. Let us therefore allow ourselves to be reached by this look, which is directed not to our eyes but to our heart. In silence, let us listen to what he has to say to us from beyond death itself. By means of the Holy Shroud, the unique and supreme Word of God comes to us: Love made man, incarnate in our history; the merciful love of God who has taken upon himself all the evil of the world to free us from its power.  This disfigured face resembles all those faces of men and women marred by a life which does not respect their dignity, by war and violence which afflict the weakest… And yet, at the same time, the face in the Shroud conveys a great peace; this tortured body expresses a sovereign majesty. It is as if it let a restrained but powerful energy within it shine through, as if to say: have faith, do not lose hope; the power of the love of God, the power of the Risen One overcomes all things. So, looking upon the Man of the Shroud, I make my own the prayer which Saint Francis of Assisi prayed before the Crucifix: Most High, glorious God, enlighten the shadows of my heart, and grant me a right faith, a certain hope and perfect charity, sense and understanding, Lord, so that I may accomplish your holy and true command. Amen. One Catholic commentator on St. Francis' speech above noted, “"The shroud draws [people] to the tormented face and body of Jesus and, at the same time, directs [people] toward the face of every suffering and unjustly persecuted person." This is condemning/damming the Shroud with faint praise and reinforces that Pope Francis really does think (wrongly) that the Shroud is just another fake icon.” I agree with that commentator - reading between the lines of St. Francis' pronunciation, speech, it is quite clear that he is either a Shroud Agnostic, or possibly even thinks it is a forgery.  So - it would seem that, in the Catholic church, the opinions on the authenticity of The Shroud are quite varied. It appears that more Catholic leaders consider The Shroud authentic than do leaders of other major religious groups, but the fact that The Vatican has stopped short of pronouncing the Turin Shroud should possibly give us pause. Do they have reason to suspect it is inauthentic - unreleased reasons? Possibly.  I'll say this - I don't understand religious veneration of objects. That seems completely contra to the clear teachings of the Old and New Testaments. Some branches of Christianity do this, but I think they are missing it. If The Shroud is authentic, then it is fascinating and wonderful, but not at all worthy of a single drop of religious devotion. If it is inauthentic, then it is less so.  Either way, it is a fascinating artifact.  If genuine, it is one of the great treasures of history and should be in our finest museum. Just don't worship it - it is a linen cloth. It didn't die for you. It has no power to save you. I see no indication that it holds any special significance to God. I own a collectible card with a verified piece of a jacket that Elvis Presley sang in and wore. If I had the whole jacket - what would that avail me? Would it help me dance better? Sing better? Become more famous? Could I bring it to Graceland and get free entry for wearing it? Could I take it to surviving members of Elvis' family, and ask to become an honorary Presley? None of those things. And The Shroud would get you less far in Heaven than The Presley jacket would get you in Graceland.  What should we do if it is inauthentic? Burn it, throw it away? Of course not! I still believe it belongs in our finest museums of art (as opposed to history) If it is art - it is incredible art. Mystifying and awe-inspiring.  Whatever it is - The Vatican isn't saying for sure one way, or another. They appear to be fans, but in a mostly unofficial capacity. Maybe Myth: The Shroud has been fully replicated. One of the major issues that has surrounded The Shroud from the beginning has been that, up until recently - even skeptics agreed that the way The Shroud was produced is unknown and thus postulating a medieval forgery was quite difficult, because nobody knew how a person could forge such an image with medieval equipment. There have been other ancient technologies that have been a mystery to modern man. Damascus steel, for instance, has not been inarguably replicated by modern blacksmiths. Roman Concrete has a kind of durability that modern concrete lacks, and scientists are only recently discovering some of the secrets to its longevity. Archimedes is said to have developed a sort of heat ray that was powerful enough to burn up boats from a significant distance away, but it is difficult for us to replicate such a ray using the technology that Archimedes would have had 200 years before the birth of Jesus. To that list, we should certainly add The Shroud, for if it is a forgery - it is an incredibly sophisticated, impressive and technologically advanced one. N.D. Wilson's amazing 2005 article in Christianity Today, entitled “Father Brown fakes The Shroud” is a must read for Shroud enthusiasts. Unfortunately, the only possible way to read it is to get your hands on that 2005 magazine in a library somewhere, or pay CT $30 for a digital subscription - which is what I did. 15 years ago N.D. Wilson supposedly figured out how one might fake The Shroud of Turin, and since that time, I have heard several people say or intimate that The Shroud had conclusively been proven a fraud with the 1-2 punch of #1 1988 medieval dating and #2 Wilson's reproduction. Wilson's method of duplicating The Shroud is ingenious. Basically, he and an artist friend painted a reverse image on a large pane of glass, and then had the sun shine through that image onto a Linen cloth over a period of several days. The sun bleached the cloth - lighter in areas of heavy paint and darker in areas of light paint. The resulting image does indeed look fairly authentic and Shroud-like to the naked eye. It does prove that it is possible, with the right equipment,  to put a negative-like image like The Shroud onto a linen cloth. Here are some objections that have been raised: 1. The cloth contains pollen from plants only found in Palestine - that would be difficult for a European forger to get. For one, he would have no idea that such a thing could potentially authenticate The Shroud. Wilson notes that the cloth could have been procured from a first century, Jewish grave, which I suppose is technically possible.  2. The figure in the Turin Shroud is pierced through his wrists, not through his hands. In recent years, it has been discovered that crucified people would have to have been pierced through their wrists (and not their hands) in order to actually be suspended from a cross. This does not at all contradict the Passion accounts in all four Gospels in the Bible, because the Greek word used for ‘hands' can also include the wrist area, unlike our English, which more clearly delineates between the two. Almost the totality of medieval art depicts the nails used during the crucifixion of Jesus being located in the hands, rather than the wrists. If the Shroud were a forgery, it is remarkable in the extreme that the forger would have known to include nail holes in the wrists, rather than in the hands. 3. I am not an expert on 1300s era glass technology, but some who are have argued that the kind of large and flat pane windows that would have been needed to sun-bleach the painted image of a man onto a large linen cloth would not have been available in the early medieval period. This is a fairly strong objection that I don't believe Wilson's article - as thorough as it is - addresses fully. 4. The figure on the Shroud has real wounds and real blood. This, of course, means that it was more than merely a sun-bleached image. Wilson contends that somebody had to have been murdered in order for forgers to make The Shroud using his method. Again, such a thing is technically possible. 5. It appears to some that the figure in The Shroud has coins in its eyes - and the type of coins appear to be first century coins that would have been commonly used in Israel during the time of Christ. That a medieval forger would be able to add such a detail is fairly astonishing. Of course, as with everything surrounding The Shroud, others (and Wilson, I presume) argue that there are no coin impressions in the eyes of the Shroud-figure. 6. Finally, if The Shroud is a forgery, those who painted the image on the glass had a remarkable and accurate knowledge of both the full details of Roman crucifixion and how the body would have responded to such crucifixion. Additionally, the anonymous forgers would have had to have a strong knowledge of anatomy and wound-effects, as the wounds on The Shroud figure are consistent with what modern medical technology would expect. Wilson contends that there were many medieval people with deep and accurate knowledge of anatomy, and the only reason we don't expect the forgers to have such knowledge is because we have a sort of bias against people from the past and assume they are unsophisticated and unintelligent. Such bias is certainly real, I will readily admit, though it does seem that medical history of the last 500 years demonstrates that medieval medicine and anatomy was indeed quite primitive. So - did Wilson definitively prove that medieval forgers could have produced The Shroud? Maybe, maybe not. Even Wilson admits, “I have not proved much. Or, I do not think that I have. Men and women who have believed in the Shroud will continue to believe. There is a fireman somewhere in Italy who risked his life to save the Shroud. I have a great deal of respect for that man. Perhaps I've given those who disbelieve more reason for noses lifted in the air, but I have not proved that the Shroud was faked. What I have done is crudely demonstrate that such an image could easily be produced in a matter of weeks by wicked men with no scruples, a little imagination, and a little more skill. The fact that it could have been faked does not mean that it was, though I believe it to have been. ”   I'll say this - Wilson's supposed forgers would have had to be: remarkably intelligent, gifted with art, well supplied with very rare (if existent) glass panes, and have an astonishing - for the time - knowledge of medicine, Roman history and human anatomy. Additionally, they would have had to be in possession of a cloth from Palestine, and possibly even pollen that had come from Palestine as well.  There have been other attempts to recreate the Shroud as well. In 2009 the University of Pavia organic chemistry professor and skeptic society member Luigi Garlaschelli produced a fairly convincing (at first glance) reproduction. He describes his attempt: "What you have now is a very fuzzy, dusty and weak image, Then for the sake of completeness I have added the bloodstains, the burns, the scorching because there was a fire in 1532." Garlaschelli says his work disproves the claims of the shroud's strongest supporters. "Basically the Shroud of Turin has some strange properties and characteristics that they say cannot be reproduced by human hands,"For example, the image is superficial and has no pigment, it looks so lifelike and so on, and therefore they say it cannot have been done by an artist." "The procedure is very simple. The artist took this sheet and put it over one of his assistants," "His good idea was to wrap the sheet over the person underneath because he didn't want to obtain an image that was too obviously a painting or a drawing, so with this procedure you get a strange image, Time did the rest,"  As you might imagine, there are several people who disagree that Garlaschelli has produced a convincing replica. Dr. Thibault Heimburger has written an extensive and scientific rebuttal of Garlaschelli's method, essentially arguing that it does not really duplicate all of the elements of the Shroud, but is only a superficial likeness. His paper, linked in the shownotes, concludes:  L.G. concluded: “We have also shown that pigments containing traces of acidic compounds can be artificially aged after the rubbing step (…) in such a way that, when the pigment is washed away, an image is obtained having the expected characteristics as the Shroud of Turin. In particular the image is pseudo negative, is fuzzy with half-tones, resides on the top-most fibers of the cloth, has some 3D embedded properties and does not fluoresce”. I think to the contrary that the image has none of these characteristics (except negativity and nonfluorescence). L.G. used a sophisticated method and a new interesting hypothesis, and he got the best Shroud-like image today. It is interesting to notice that even so, the properties of his image remain in fact very far from the fundamental properties of the Shroud image. 9 For the moment, the Shroud image remains unfakeable. Source: https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/thibault-lg.pdf Shroud blogger Stephen Jones has also debunked the replication of Garlaschelli: http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com/2018/08/my-critique-of-borrini-m-garlaschelli-l.html  3. The complex herringbone twill pattern of the Shroud was not possible in the first century.  Some Shroud skeptics have speculated that the particular pattern of sewing used on the Shroud is too complex and advanced have been created in the first century.  In the Summer of 2000, archaeologists James Tabor and Shimon Gibson stumbled upon a freshly robbed first century grave outside of Jerusalem. Amazingly, the grave still had bodies in it, and one of them was encased in a somewhat intact first century shroud - the first shroud of that era that has been recovered in or around Jerusalem. Tabor writes of this discovery in a way that is very dismissive of the Turin Shroud:  Although 1st century cloth has been found at Masada and in caves in the Judean Desert, nothing of this sort had ever been found in Jerusalem. Apparently that niche, sealed with a blocking stone, had a geological fissure that kept water from seeping in and rotting the material. The tomb had any number of interesting features. DNA studies were done on all the individuals represented in the tomb—the first time, so far as we know, that this had even been done in an ancient Jerusalem tomb of this period. Textile analysis was done on the cloth—it turned out to be a mixture of linen and wool, not woven together but layered with a separate head piece. It had a distinctive 1st century weave—in contrast to the Shroud of Turin.  News articles from major sites like BBC and CNN concluded that this was yet more evidence that the Shroud was a fake. From the CNN article:  “And in addition, the weave of the shroud raises fresh doubts about the Shroud of Turin, which many people believe was used to wrap the body of Jesus. According to researchers involved in the excavation and subsequent testing, the recently discovered shroud lends more credible evidence that the Shroud of Turin does not date to Roman times when Jesus died but from a later period.” SOURCE: http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/12/16/mideast.ancient.shroud/index.html However, it should be noted that none of the researchers actually engaged in much textile research, nor were they textile experts. They were simply taking the design and weave  of one 1st century burial cloth and concluding that all other 1st century burial cloths from that area would have a similar weave-pattern. That seems plausible at first, but it turns out that it is not true.  Hamburg textile expert Mechthild Flury-Lemberg is a recognized art historian and expert on the restoration of ancient textiles. She was able to examine and work on restoration/repair of the Shroud in 2001/2002 and published a book on it. She concludes on chapter of that book by saying:  “The seam that connects the 8 cm wide strip to the larger segment is not a simple one. The type of seam construction chosen clearly displays the intention to make the seam disappear on the face of the cloth as much as possible. This is another reason to believe that the Shroud was planned and produced by professionals. The sewing has been done from the reverse of the fabric and the stitches have been executed with great care and are barely noticeable on the face of the Shroud. The seam appears flat on the face and raised like a roll on the reverse of the fabric . Examples of this same kind of seam are again to be found among the textile fragments of Masada, already mentioned above. To conclude this chapter it can be said that the linen cloth of the Shroud of Turin does not display any weaving or sewing techniques which speak against its origin as a high quality product of the textile workers of the first century A.D.” SOURCE: Sindon by Mechthild Flury-Lemberg, pages 59-60, December 2001. John Tyerer, a chartered textile technologist, “It would be reasonable to conclude the linen textiles with ‘Z' twist yarns and woven 3/1 reversing twill similar to the Turin Shroud could have been produced in the first century Syria or Palestine.” (Source: The Shroud and The Controversy by Gary Habermas and Kenneth E. Stevenson, pg. 69)  4. The Shroud was myth-busted by John Calvin, among many others, who show us that The Scripture demands TWO burial cloths (one for the head, one for the body) and not ONE.  The Sudarium of Oviedo, long believed to be the "napkin" that was wrapped around Our Lord's head after His crucifixion and death, has been shown to have 120 "points of coincidence" with the Shroud, including the same AB blood type. Researchers assert, "The only possible conclusion is that the Oviedo sudarium covered the same face as the Turin Shroud." John Calvin:  4 Arguments against The Shroud:  THERE ARE MULTIPLE ‘SHROUDS' THAT CLAIM TO BE GENUINE.   It is now time to treat of the “sudary,” about which relic they have displayed their folly even more than in the affair of the holy coat; for besides the sudary of Veronica, which is shown in the Church of St Peter at Rome, it is the boast of several towns that they each possess one, as for instance Carcassone, Nice, Aix-la-Chapelle, Tréves, Besançon, without reckoning the fragments to be seen in various places.Now, I ask whether those persons were not bereft of their senses who could take long pilgrimages, at much expense and fatigue, in order to see sheets, of the reality of which there were no reasons to believe, but many to doubt; for whoever admitted the reality of one of these sudaries shown in so many places, must have considered the rest as wicked impostures set up to deceive the public by the pretence that they were each the real sheet in which Christ's body had been wrapped.  Answer: That counterfeits exist does not at all prove that there is no genuine article. Rather, a counterfeit shroud (or three) can be a fairly convincing proof that - at least at one time - there was a significant genuine shroud. 2. THE BIBLE DOES NOT RECORD A CLOTH WITH AN IMPRESSION ON IT.  St John, in his Gospel, relates even how St Peter, having entered the sepulchre, saw the linen clothes lying on one side, and the napkin that was about his head on the other; but he does not say that there was a miraculous impression of our Lord's figure upon these clothes, and it is not to be imagined that he would have omitted to mention such a work of God if there had been any thing of this kind. Answer: John 21:25 25 And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which, if they were written one by one, I suppose not even the world itself could contain the books that would be written.  This is a clear argument from silence. That doesn't mean it carries now weight - it does indeed carry some weight...but not enough to actually disprove the veracity of the Shroud. It should be pointed out that the miracle of the Shroud IF it happened and IF it was noticed by the ladies or the disciples would NOT have been all that significant in comparison to the resurrection of Jesus or the appearance of angels at the tomb. One can quite easily answer this argument from silence with another plausible argument from silence, and it is one I've not heard before. Consider how short, relatively speaking, each of the Gospels are - the Longest is Luke, checking in at just under 20000 words. In total, all four Gospels are approximately 65,000 words - not very lengthy. This is about the size of a shortish paper-back novel.  Given the relative brevity of these accounts, I find it remarkable that ALL FOUR Gospels mention the grave clothes of Jesus. Why? It would seem there would be little reason to record any details about the grave clothes unless...possibly...something remarkable happened to them. Now - is that argument enough to convince a skeptic? Of course not - because it is a very, very weak argument! So is Calvin's argument here that the Gospels would have mentioned it if something miraculous happened with the grave-wrapping of Jesus.  3. THE CLOTHES WERE GUARDED AND LEFT IN THE GRAVE.  Another point to be observed is, that the evangelists do not mention that either of the disciples or the faithful women who came to the sepulchre had removed the clothes in question, but, on the contrary, their account seems to imply that they were left there. Now, the sepulchre was guarded by soldiers, and consequently the clothes were in their power. Is it possible that they would have permitted the disciples to take them away as relics, since these very men had been bribed by the Pharisees to perjure themselves by saying that the disciples had stolen the body of our Lord ?  This one is not terribly difficult to answer. None of the gospels record the detail of removing the clothing, which could be because they did indeed remove it, but did not notice an image imprinted on it. It is highly unlikely they would have left cloth behind in the grave for reasons both sentimental and practical. As well, it should be noted that the Gospels do not record the presence of a guard at the tomb AFTER the resurrection of Jesus.  4. THE SHROUD IS ONE CLOTH AND THE BIBLE CLEARLY SHOWS THAT TWO CLOTHS SERVED TO BURY JESUS. I shall conclude with a convincing proof of the audacity of the Papists. Wherever the holy sudary is exhibited, they show a large sheet with the full-length likeness of a human body on it. Now, St John's Gospel, chapter nine teenth, says that Christ was buried according to the manner of the Jews ; and what was their custom ? This may be known by their present custom on such occasions, as well as from their books, which describe the ancient ceremony of interment, which was to wrap the body in a sheet, to the shoulders, and to cover the head with a separate cloth. This is precisely how the evangelist described it, saying, that St Peter saw on one side the clothes with which the body had been wrapped, and on the other the napkin from about his head. In short, either St John is a liar, or all those who boast of possessing the holy sudary are convicted of falsehood and deceit. * * This is probably Calvin's most well known argument contra the Shroud and the one that I hear most well-educated Protestants make when I bring up the Shroud to them That the Bible suggests a plurality of gravecloths, but the Shroud is only one cloth. On the surface, this might seem like a pretty compelling claim against the Shroud, but it is not quite as open and shut as Calvin would have us believe.  The most relevant passage in the Bible to this discussion is John 20:  6 Then, following him, Simon Peter came also. He entered the tomb and saw the linen cloths lying there. 7 The wrapping that had been on His head was not lying with the linen cloths but was folded up in a separate place by itself. Pretty clear, right - according to John's Gospel, there were not ONE but TWO burial cloths that wrapped Jesus. One, mentioned in vs 6 (Greek: ὀθόνια (othonia)/PLURAL)  and the other in verse 7 - a cloth wrapped around Jesus' head. (Greek: σουδάριον Soudarion)  Here's the thing, though - Many Shroud researchers, including Kenneth Stevenson, Gary Habermas, Ian Wilson, Barrie Schwortz and others contend that the Shroud shows evidence that there was a head cloth wrapped around the Shroud figure's neck and head - most likely to hold the jaw in place.  It would appear that the Sudarion was not a very significant part of the grave cloths that wrapped Jesus, as Matthew, Mark and Luke do not mention it in particular. Consider:  Mark 15:46 46 After he bought some fine linen, he took Him down and wrapped Him in the linen. Then he placed Him in a tomb cut out of the rock, and rolled a stone against the entrance to the tomb. Luke 23:53 and 24:12  52 He approached Pilate and asked for Jesus' body. 53 Taking it down, he wrapped it in fine linen and placed it in a tomb cut into the rock, where no one had ever been placed...12 Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb. When he stooped to look in, he saw only the linen cloths. So he went home, amazed at what had happened. And Matthew 27: 59 So Joseph took the body, wrapped it in clean, fine linen, 60 and placed it in his new tomb, which he had cut into the rock. He left after rolling a great stone against the entrance of the tomb. So, the three synoptic gospels - Matthew, Mark and Luke - don't mention the head-wrapping, or the sudarion, but John does. Could this indicate that the sudarion was a smaller garment - one that would not have left much of an imprint on the Shroud? Possibly. But, again, I emphasize - The Shroud seems to allow for the existence of a head-scarf type wrapping, as well as ones around the wrists and feet. Rather than the Biblical account disproving The Shroud, it actually seems to describe it quite well. 5. THE ABUNDANCE OF FAKE RELICS PUT FORWARD BY MEDIEVAL CATHOLICS PROVES THE SHROUD IS ALSO FAKE.  St Honoratus has a body at Arles, and another at the island of Lerins, near Antibes.St Giles has a body at Toulouse, and a second in a town bearing his name in Languedoc.I could quote an infinite number of similar cases. I think that the exhibitors of these relics should at least have made some arrangement amongst themselves the better to conceal their barefaced impostures. Something of this sort was managed between the canons of Trêves and those of Liége about St Lambert's head. They compounded, for a sum of money, not to show publicly the head in their possession, in order to avoid the natural surprise of the public at the same relic being seen in two different towns situated so near to each other. But, as I have already remarked at the commencement of this treatise, the inventors of these frauds never imagined anyone could be found bold enough to speak out and expose their deceptions. This is really more of a subset of argument #1, and it is a fairly strong argument. However, it must be said that not every statement made by a dishonest person is a lie, and it is perfectly possible that not every relic claimed by the medieval Catholic church was fake. Most likely were. Were they ALL fake?  I'm not convinced they were.  So - Hopefully you've enjoyed this little bit of busting myths.  You can probably tell that I want the Shroud to be the real thing. There's several reasons for this, but none of them are apologetics-related. In other words, I don't want the Shroud to be the real burial cloth of Jesus because I think that would help prove the Bible to be reliable, or Jesus to be the resurrected Son of God. No article could prove such a thing. I do, however, want the Shroud to be real and genuine in the same sort of way that I want there to be a real Loch Ness Monster, or an extant Holy Grail somewhere out there. The world is a more interesting place with a legit Nessie swimming around in the cold waters of Scotland, and it is a more interesting place with real, tangible artifacts from the time of Jesus. Does that bias me? Possibly it does, and I don't want to enter this discussion biased. It does make me consider the claims of debunkers with a greater skepticism, however, and that might not be a bad thing.  I love John Calvin and am quite persuaded by his soteriological leanings in the realm of theology. That said, I believe his debunking of The Shroud is somewhat ham-handed, especially his contention that it is easily proved false by John 20 argument that the Bible says there were two different kinds of grave-clothes. I believe that there were indeed two different kinds of graveclothes used on Jesus - the Bible is explicit about this - there was a linen cloth that the body of Jesus was wrapped in, and a head covering (of some sort) that went along with it. That said, the Shroud appears to show evidence of there being a head scarf or head wrapping of some sort, and even if it didn't, one could easily see how the Shroud figure could have been wrapped in more than one cloth. I have little patience for people who believe the extraordinary simply because somebody told them it was so - gullibility is delightful in children, but unbecoming and unsophisticated in adults. I also have little patience for those who claim to debunk complex objects and possibilities with overly-simplistic and reductionist arguments. It is definitely possible - even plausible - that the Shroud of Turin is a medieval forgery, but the fact that John 20:7 mentions a sudarion that was on the head of Jesus does not necessarily debunk the authenticity of The Shroud in any sore of logical, philosophical or archaeological way.  Ok - that was a long episode. ONE more Shroud episode coming up - a summation of sorts. I hope to have 20-25 reasons to believe the Shroud could be authentic as well as a number of reasons to NOT believe in the authenticity of The Shroud. Thanks for being patient, and thanks for listening. Please leave a positive review if you are so inclined. 

Episode 4: Busting Shroud Myths, Part 2:  In one statement, John Walsh (His book The Shroud) observed: “The Shroud of Turin is either the most awesome and instructive relic of Jesus Christ in existence ... or it is one of the most ingenious, most unbelievably clever, products of the human mind and hand on record. It is one or the other; there is no middle ground.”  I did a recent - July, 2019 - survey of Baptist Pastors on The Shroud of Turin. Of those that responded to the poll - only 3.5 percent believed that the Shroud was the genuine burial cloth of Jesus. Half of them were agnostic - it was an interesting historical artifact that could not be verified, and just slightly under half 41 percent - believed the Shroud to be a forgery. I did a much larger poll in The Astonishing Legends facebook group - a group of people that are quite open and interested in paranormal things. In that survey, 132 out of 350 - 38 percent - believed the Shroud to be a hoax, which is very similar to the Baptist pastor's percentage. However, there were more true believers in the paranormal group, with 37 out of 350 - 11 percent - believing that the Shroud was the genuine burial cloth of Jesus. Shroud agnostics - believing the Shroud to be interesting, but unverifiable - represented 181 out of 350 respondents, just over half at 52 percent. Therefore, based on my informal surveys of a little over 400 people - roughly half of those respondents are just like me - uncertain about the Shroud. Over the next few episodes of this podcast, we are going to cover the history of the Shroud of Turin, and the most modern research and findings. Maybe by the time we are done, we'll all still be Shroud agnostics, but maybe - just maybe - we will together unearth enough information to change our minds and develop a clearer and more definitive view of one of the most controversial and noteworthy artifacts of church history.   Today, we are continuing to bust some myths about the Shroud. Next episode we will present 10-25 arguments in favor of the authenticity of the Shroud, some arguments against it, and likely conclude this series. Myth: The Shroud has always been owned by the Catholic Church, and they have officially endorsed it. In fact, it appears that the Catholic Church did not have official possession of The Shroud until 1983 when the royal House of Savoy conveyed ownership of The Shroud to The Holy See. If you remember your AP Modern European History, you might remember that the Savoys began as a small ruling family in the Alps northwest of Italy proper, and grew to become the dominant royal family in Italy, reigning over the country from 1861-1946, and also briefly ruled Spain in the 1800s. Although the Catholic church does not have an official position on The Shroud, several Popes and other church officials have commented favorably about it, including: Cardinal Ratzenberger/Pope Benedict, who called The Shroud, “A truly mysterious image, which no human artistry was capable of producing. In some inexplicable way, it appeared imprinted upon cloth and claimed to show the true face of Christ, the crucified and risen Lord".” (This was said when Ratzenberger was a Cardinal, and was not said officially/Ex Cathedra, so it was not considered an official endorsement of the whole church. Pius 11, 1936, “These are not pictures of the Blessed Virgin, it is true, but pictures that remind us of her as no other can. Since they are pictures of her Divine Son, and so, we can truly say, the most moving, loveliest, dearest ones that we can imagine."   What a strange quote - am I wrong that it seems to be suggesting that pictures of Mary, mother of Jesus, would be more remarkable than pictures of Jesus, the son of God? When any theology places more attention, emphasis and weight on Mary than they do on Jesus, this is where I have a massive difference with them. Source of quote “The Shroud, a Guide” by Gino Morreto. (I note here that I can't find this quote by Pius 11 elsewhere) Pope John Paul II  "Since it is not a matter of faith, the church has no specific competence to pronounce on these questions," the late Pope John Paul II said in 1998. ALSO:  “The Holy Shroud is the most splendid relic of the Passion and Resurrection [of Our Lord Jesus Christ]. We become what we contemplate... Why don't we contemplate the Icon of Icons: The Holy Face of Jesus!" Instead of icons made by man, let us venerate the greatest icon of all: The Holy Face of Jesus!” and also, “The Shroud is an image of God's love as well as of human sin ... The imprint left by the tortured body of the Crucified One, which attests to the tremendous human capacity for causing pain and death to one's fellow man, stands as an icon of the suffering of the innocent in every age." Most recently, Pope Francis commented on The Shroud during his first Easter address: Dear Brothers and Sisters, I join all of you gathered before the Holy Shroud, and I thank the Lord for offering us this opportunity, thanks also to new devices. We do not merely “look” if we are looking at it, it is not a simple look, but it is a form of veneration, a look of prayer and also it is a way of letting him look at us. This face has eyes that are closed, it is the face of one who is dead, and yet mysteriously he is watching us, and in silence he speaks to us. How is this possible? How is it that the faithful, like you, pause before this icon of a man scourged and crucified? It is because the Man of the Shroud invites us to contemplate Jesus of Nazareth.  This image, impressed upon the cloth, speaks to our heart and moves us to climb the hill of Calvary, to look upon the wood of the Cross, and to immerse ourselves in the eloquent silence of love. Let us therefore allow ourselves to be reached by this look, which is directed not to our eyes but to our heart. In silence, let us listen to what he has to say to us from beyond death itself. By means of the Holy Shroud, the unique and supreme Word of God comes to us: Love made man, incarnate in our history; the merciful love of God who has taken upon himself all the evil of the world to free us from its power.  This disfigured face resembles all those faces of men and women marred by a life which does not respect their dignity, by war and violence which afflict the weakest… And yet, at the same time, the face in the Shroud conveys a great peace; this tortured body expresses a sovereign majesty. It is as if it let a restrained but powerful energy within it shine through, as if to say: have faith, do not lose hope; the power of the love of God, the power of the Risen One overcomes all things. So, looking upon the Man of the Shroud, I make my own the prayer which Saint Francis of Assisi prayed before the Crucifix: Most High, glorious God, enlighten the shadows of my heart, and grant me a right faith, a certain hope and perfect charity, sense and understanding, Lord, so that I may accomplish your holy and true command. Amen. One Catholic commentator on St. Francis' speech above noted, “"The shroud draws [people] to the tormented face and body of Jesus and, at the same time, directs [people] toward the face of every suffering and unjustly persecuted person." This is condemning/damming the Shroud with faint praise and reinforces that Pope Francis really does think (wrongly) that the Shroud is just another fake icon.” I agree with that commentator - reading between the lines of St. Francis' pronunciation, speech, it is quite clear that he is either a Shroud Agnostic, or possibly even thinks it is a forgery.  So - it would seem that, in the Catholic church, the opinions on the authenticity of The Shroud are quite varied. It appears that more Catholic leaders consider The Shroud authentic than do leaders of other major religious groups, but the fact that The Vatican has stopped short of pronouncing the Turin Shroud should possibly give us pause. Do they have reason to suspect it is inauthentic - unreleased reasons? Possibly.  I'll say this - I don't understand religious veneration of objects. That seems completely contra to the clear teachings of the Old and New Testaments. Some branches of Christianity do this, but I think they are missing it. If The Shroud is authentic, then it is fascinating and wonderful, but not at all worthy of a single drop of religious devotion. If it is inauthentic, then it is less so.  Either way, it is a fascinating artifact.  If genuine, it is one of the great treasures of history and should be in our finest museum. Just don't worship it - it is a linen cloth. It didn't die for you. It has no power to save you. I see no indication that it holds any special significance to God. I own a collectible card with a verified piece of a jacket that Elvis Presley sang in and wore. If I had the whole jacket - what would that avail me? Would it help me dance better? Sing better? Become more famous? Could I bring it to Graceland and get free entry for wearing it? Could I take it to surviving members of Elvis' family, and ask to become an honorary Presley? None of those things. And The Shroud would get you less far in Heaven than The Presley jacket would get you in Graceland.  What should we do if it is inauthentic? Burn it, throw it away? Of course not! I still believe it belongs in our finest museums of art (as opposed to history) If it is art - it is incredible art. Mystifying and awe-inspiring.  Whatever it is - The Vatican isn't saying for sure one way, or another. They appear to be fans, but in a mostly unofficial capacity. Maybe Myth: The Shroud has been fully replicated. One of the major issues that has surrounded The Shroud from the beginning has been that, up until recently - even skeptics agreed that the way The Shroud was produced is unknown and thus postulating a medieval forgery was quite difficult, because nobody knew how a person could forge such an image with medieval equipment. There have been other ancient technologies that have been a mystery to modern man. Damascus steel, for instance, has not been inarguably replicated by modern blacksmiths. Roman Concrete has a kind of durability that modern concrete lacks, and scientists are only recently discovering some of the secrets to its longevity. Archimedes is said to have developed a sort of heat ray that was powerful enough to burn up boats from a significant distance away, but it is difficult for us to replicate such a ray using the technology that Archimedes would have had 200 years before the birth of Jesus. To that list, we should certainly add The Shroud, for if it is a forgery - it is an incredibly sophisticated, impressive and technologically advanced one. N.D. Wilson's amazing 2005 article in Christianity Today, entitled “Father Brown fakes The Shroud” is a must read for Shroud enthusiasts. Unfortunately, the only possible way to read it is to get your hands on that 2005 magazine in a library somewhere, or pay CT $30 for a digital subscription - which is what I did. 15 years ago N.D. Wilson supposedly figured out how one might fake The Shroud of Turin, and since that time, I have heard several people say or intimate that The Shroud had conclusively been proven a fraud with the 1-2 punch of #1 1988 medieval dating and #2 Wilson's reproduction. Wilson's method of duplicating The Shroud is ingenious. Basically, he and an artist friend painted a reverse image on a large pane of glass, and then had the sun shine through that image onto a Linen cloth over a period of several days. The sun bleached the cloth - lighter in areas of heavy paint and darker in areas of light paint. The resulting image does indeed look fairly authentic and Shroud-like to the naked eye. It does prove that it is possible, with the right equipment,  to put a negative-like image like The Shroud onto a linen cloth. Here are some objections that have been raised: 1. The cloth contains pollen from plants only found in Palestine - that would be difficult for a European forger to get. For one, he would have no idea that such a thing could potentially authenticate The Shroud. Wilson notes that the cloth could have been procured from a first century, Jewish grave, which I suppose is technically possible.  2. The figure in the Turin Shroud is pierced through his wrists, not through his hands. In recent years, it has been discovered that crucified people would have to have been pierced through their wrists (and not their hands) in order to actually be suspended from a cross. This does not at all contradict the Passion accounts in all four Gospels in the Bible, because the Greek word used for ‘hands' can also include the wrist area, unlike our English, which more clearly delineates between the two. Almost the totality of medieval art depicts the nails used during the crucifixion of Jesus being located in the hands, rather than the wrists. If the Shroud were a forgery, it is remarkable in the extreme that the forger would have known to include nail holes in the wrists, rather than in the hands. 3. I am not an expert on 1300s era glass technology, but some who are have argued that the kind of large and flat pane windows that would have been needed to sun-bleach the painted image of a man onto a large linen cloth would not have been available in the early medieval period. This is a fairly strong objection that I don't believe Wilson's article - as thorough as it is - addresses fully. 4. The figure on the Shroud has real wounds and real blood. This, of course, means that it was more than merely a sun-bleached image. Wilson contends that somebody had to have been murdered in order for forgers to make The Shroud using his method. Again, such a thing is technically possible. 5. It appears to some that the figure in The Shroud has coins in its eyes - and the type of coins appear to be first century coins that would have been commonly used in Israel during the time of Christ. That a medieval forger would be able to add such a detail is fairly astonishing. Of course, as with everything surrounding The Shroud, others (and Wilson, I presume) argue that there are no coin impressions in the eyes of the Shroud-figure. 6. Finally, if The Shroud is a forgery, those who painted the image on the glass had a remarkable and accurate knowledge of both the full details of Roman crucifixion and how the body would have responded to such crucifixion. Additionally, the anonymous forgers would have had to have a strong knowledge of anatomy and wound-effects, as the wounds on The Shroud figure are consistent with what modern medical technology would expect. Wilson contends that there were many medieval people with deep and accurate knowledge of anatomy, and the only reason we don't expect the forgers to have such knowledge is because we have a sort of bias against people from the past and assume they are unsophisticated and unintelligent. Such bias is certainly real, I will readily admit, though it does seem that medical history of the last 500 years demonstrates that medieval medicine and anatomy was indeed quite primitive. So - did Wilson definitively prove that medieval forgers could have produced The Shroud? Maybe, maybe not. Even Wilson admits, “I have not proved much. Or, I do not think that I have. Men and women who have believed in the Shroud will continue to believe. There is a fireman somewhere in Italy who risked his life to save the Shroud. I have a great deal of respect for that man. Perhaps I've given those who disbelieve more reason for noses lifted in the air, but I have not proved that the Shroud was faked. What I have done is crudely demonstrate that such an image could easily be produced in a matter of weeks by wicked men with no scruples, a little imagination, and a little more skill. The fact that it could have been faked does not mean that it was, though I believe it to have been. ”   I'll say this - Wilson's supposed forgers would have had to be: remarkably intelligent, gifted with art, well supplied with very rare (if existent) glass panes, and have an astonishing - for the time - knowledge of medicine, Roman history and human anatomy. Additionally, they would have had to be in possession of a cloth from Palestine, and possibly even pollen that had come from Palestine as well.  There have been other attempts to recreate the Shroud as well. In 2009 the University of Pavia organic chemistry professor and skeptic society member Luigi Garlaschelli produced a fairly convincing (at first glance) reproduction. He describes his attempt: "What you have now is a very fuzzy, dusty and weak image, Then for the sake of completeness I have added the bloodstains, the burns, the scorching because there was a fire in 1532." Garlaschelli says his work disproves the claims of the shroud's strongest supporters. "Basically the Shroud of Turin has some strange properties and characteristics that they say cannot be reproduced by human hands,"For example, the image is superficial and has no pigment, it looks so lifelike and so on, and therefore they say it cannot have been done by an artist." "The procedure is very simple. The artist took this sheet and put it over one of his assistants," "His good idea was to wrap the sheet over the person underneath because he didn't want to obtain an image that was too obviously a painting or a drawing, so with this procedure you get a strange image, Time did the rest,"  As you might imagine, there are several people who disagree that Garlaschelli has produced a convincing replica. Dr. Thibault Heimburger has written an extensive and scientific rebuttal of Garlaschelli's method, essentially arguing that it does not really duplicate all of the elements of the Shroud, but is only a superficial likeness. His paper, linked in the shownotes, concludes:  L.G. concluded: “We have also shown that pigments containing traces of acidic compounds can be artificially aged after the rubbing step (…) in such a way that, when the pigment is washed away, an image is obtained having the expected characteristics as the Shroud of Turin. In particular the image is pseudo negative, is fuzzy with half-tones, resides on the top-most fibers of the cloth, has some 3D embedded properties and does not fluoresce”. I think to the contrary that the image has none of these characteristics (except negativity and nonfluorescence). L.G. used a sophisticated method and a new interesting hypothesis, and he got the best Shroud-like image today. It is interesting to notice that even so, the properties of his image remain in fact very far from the fundamental properties of the Shroud image. 9 For the moment, the Shroud image remains unfakeable. Source: https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/thibault-lg.pdf Shroud blogger Stephen Jones has also debunked the replication of Garlaschelli: http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com/2018/08/my-critique-of-borrini-m-garlaschelli-l.html  3. The complex herringbone twill pattern of the Shroud was not possible in the first century.  Some Shroud skeptics have speculated that the particular pattern of sewing used on the Shroud is too complex and advanced have been created in the first century.  In the Summer of 2000, archaeologists James Tabor and Shimon Gibson stumbled upon a freshly robbed first century grave outside of Jerusalem. Amazingly, the grave still had bodies in it, and one of them was encased in a somewhat intact first century shroud - the first shroud of that era that has been recovered in or around Jerusalem. Tabor writes of this discovery in a way that is very dismissive of the Turin Shroud:  Although 1st century cloth has been found at Masada and in caves in the Judean Desert, nothing of this sort had ever been found in Jerusalem. Apparently that niche, sealed with a blocking stone, had a geological fissure that kept water from seeping in and rotting the material. The tomb had any number of interesting features. DNA studies were done on all the individuals represented in the tomb—the first time, so far as we know, that this had even been done in an ancient Jerusalem tomb of this period. Textile analysis was done on the cloth—it turned out to be a mixture of linen and wool, not woven together but layered with a separate head piece. It had a distinctive 1st century weave—in contrast to the Shroud of Turin.  News articles from major sites like BBC and CNN concluded that this was yet more evidence that the Shroud was a fake. From the CNN article:  “And in addition, the weave of the shroud raises fresh doubts about the Shroud of Turin, which many people believe was used to wrap the body of Jesus. According to researchers involved in the excavation and subsequent testing, the recently discovered shroud lends more credible evidence that the Shroud of Turin does not date to Roman times when Jesus died but from a later period.” SOURCE: http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/12/16/mideast.ancient.shroud/index.html However, it should be noted that none of the researchers actually engaged in much textile research, nor were they textile experts. They were simply taking the design and weave  of one 1st century burial cloth and concluding that all other 1st century burial cloths from that area would have a similar weave-pattern. That seems plausible at first, but it turns out that it is not true.  Hamburg textile expert Mechthild Flury-Lemberg is a recognized art historian and expert on the restoration of ancient textiles. She was able to examine and work on restoration/repair of the Shroud in 2001/2002 and published a book on it. She concludes on chapter of that book by saying:  “The seam that connects the 8 cm wide strip to the larger segment is not a simple one. The type of seam construction chosen clearly displays the intention to make the seam disappear on the face of the cloth as much as possible. This is another reason to believe that the Shroud was planned and produced by professionals. The sewing has been done from the reverse of the fabric and the stitches have been executed with great care and are barely noticeable on the face of the Shroud. The seam appears flat on the face and raised like a roll on the reverse of the fabric . Examples of this same kind of seam are again to be found among the textile fragments of Masada, already mentioned above. To conclude this chapter it can be said that the linen cloth of the Shroud of Turin does not display any weaving or sewing techniques which speak against its origin as a high quality product of the textile workers of the first century A.D.” SOURCE: Sindon by Mechthild Flury-Lemberg, pages 59-60, December 2001. John Tyerer, a chartered textile technologist, “It would be reasonable to conclude the linen textiles with ‘Z' twist yarns and woven 3/1 reversing twill similar to the Turin Shroud could have been produced in the first century Syria or Palestine.” (Source: The Shroud and The Controversy by Gary Habermas and Kenneth E. Stevenson, pg. 69)  4. The Shroud was myth-busted by John Calvin, among many others, who show us that The Scripture demands TWO burial cloths (one for the head, one for the body) and not ONE.  The Sudarium of Oviedo, long believed to be the "napkin" that was wrapped around Our Lord's head after His crucifixion and death, has been shown to have 120 "points of coincidence" with the Shroud, including the same AB blood type. Researchers assert, "The only possible conclusion is that the Oviedo sudarium covered the same face as the Turin Shroud." John Calvin:  4 Arguments against The Shroud:  THERE ARE MULTIPLE ‘SHROUDS' THAT CLAIM TO BE GENUINE.   It is now time to treat of the “sudary,” about which relic they have displayed their folly even more than in the affair of the holy coat; for besides the sudary of Veronica, which is shown in the Church of St Peter at Rome, it is the boast of several towns that they each possess one, as for instance Carcassone, Nice, Aix-la-Chapelle, Tréves, Besançon, without reckoning the fragments to be seen in various places.Now, I ask whether those persons were not bereft of their senses who could take long pilgrimages, at much expense and fatigue, in order to see sheets, of the reality of which there were no reasons to believe, but many to doubt; for whoever admitted the reality of one of these sudaries shown in so many places, must have considered the rest as wicked impostures set up to deceive the public by the pretence that they were each the real sheet in which Christ's body had been wrapped.  Answer: That counterfeits exist does not at all prove that there is no genuine article. Rather, a counterfeit shroud (or three) can be a fairly convincing proof that - at least at one time - there was a significant genuine shroud. 2. THE BIBLE DOES NOT RECORD A CLOTH WITH AN IMPRESSION ON IT.  St John, in his Gospel, relates even how St Peter, having entered the sepulchre, saw the linen clothes lying on one side, and the napkin that was about his head on the other; but he does not say that there was a miraculous impression of our Lord's figure upon these clothes, and it is not to be imagined that he would have omitted to mention such a work of God if there had been any thing of this kind. Answer: John 21:25 25 And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which, if they were written one by one, I suppose not even the world itself could contain the books that would be written.  This is a clear argument from silence. That doesn't mean it carries now weight - it does indeed carry some weight...but not enough to actually disprove the veracity of the Shroud. It should be pointed out that the miracle of the Shroud IF it happened and IF it was noticed by the ladies or the disciples would NOT have been all that significant in comparison to the resurrection of Jesus or the appearance of angels at the tomb. One can quite easily answer this argument from silence with another plausible argument from silence, and it is one I've not heard before. Consider how short, relatively speaking, each of the Gospels are - the Longest is Luke, checking in at just under 20000 words. In total, all four Gospels are approximately 65,000 words - not very lengthy. This is about the size of a shortish paper-back novel.  Given the relative brevity of these accounts, I find it remarkable that ALL FOUR Gospels mention the grave clothes of Jesus. Why? It would seem there would be little reason to record any details about the grave clothes unless...possibly...something remarkable happened to them. Now - is that argument enough to convince a skeptic? Of course not - because it is a very, very weak argument! So is Calvin's argument here that the Gospels would have mentioned it if something miraculous happened with the grave-wrapping of Jesus.  3. THE CLOTHES WERE GUARDED AND LEFT IN THE GRAVE.  Another point to be observed is, that the evangelists do not mention that either of the disciples or the faithful women who came to the sepulchre had removed the clothes in question, but, on the contrary, their account seems to imply that they were left there. Now, the sepulchre was guarded by soldiers, and consequently the clothes were in their power. Is it possible that they would have permitted the disciples to take them away as relics, since these very men had been bribed by the Pharisees to perjure themselves by saying that the disciples had stolen the body of our Lord ?  This one is not terribly difficult to answer. None of the gospels record the detail of removing the clothing, which could be because they did indeed remove it, but did not notice an image imprinted on it. It is highly unlikely they would have left cloth behind in the grave for reasons both sentimental and practical. As well, it should be noted that the Gospels do not record the presence of a guard at the tomb AFTER the resurrection of Jesus.  4. THE SHROUD IS ONE CLOTH AND THE BIBLE CLEARLY SHOWS THAT TWO CLOTHS SERVED TO BURY JESUS. I shall conclude with a convincing proof of the audacity of the Papists. Wherever the holy sudary is exhibited, they show a large sheet with the full-length likeness of a human body on it. Now, St John's Gospel, chapter nine teenth, says that Christ was buried according to the manner of the Jews ; and what was their custom ? This may be known by their present custom on such occasions, as well as from their books, which describe the ancient ceremony of interment, which was to wrap the body in a sheet, to the shoulders, and to cover the head with a separate cloth. This is precisely how the evangelist described it, saying, that St Peter saw on one side the clothes with which the body had been wrapped, and on the other the napkin from about his head. In short, either St John is a liar, or all those who boast of possessing the holy sudary are convicted of falsehood and deceit. * * This is probably Calvin's most well known argument contra the Shroud and the one that I hear most well-educated Protestants make when I bring up the Shroud to them That the Bible suggests a plurality of gravecloths, but the Shroud is only one cloth. On the surface, this might seem like a pretty compelling claim against the Shroud, but it is not quite as open and shut as Calvin would have us believe.  The most relevant passage in the Bible to this discussion is John 20:  6 Then, following him, Simon Peter came also. He entered the tomb and saw the linen cloths lying there. 7 The wrapping that had been on His head was not lying with the linen cloths but was folded up in a separate place by itself. Pretty clear, right - according to John's Gospel, there were not ONE but TWO burial cloths that wrapped Jesus. One, mentioned in vs 6 (Greek: ὀθόνια (othonia)/PLURAL)  and the other in verse 7 - a cloth wrapped around Jesus' head. (Greek: σουδάριον Soudarion)  Here's the thing, though - Many Shroud researchers, including Kenneth Stevenson, Gary Habermas, Ian Wilson, Barrie Schwortz and others contend that the Shroud shows evidence that there was a head cloth wrapped around the Shroud figure's neck and head - most likely to hold the jaw in place.  It would appear that the Sudarion was not a very significant part of the grave cloths that wrapped Jesus, as Matthew, Mark and Luke do not mention it in particular. Consider:  Mark 15:46 46 After he bought some fine linen, he took Him down and wrapped Him in the linen. Then he placed Him in a tomb cut out of the rock, and rolled a stone against the entrance to the tomb. Luke 23:53 and 24:12  52 He approached Pilate and asked for Jesus' body. 53 Taking it down, he wrapped it in fine linen and placed it in a tomb cut into the rock, where no one had ever been placed...12 Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb. When he stooped to look in, he saw only the linen cloths. So he went home, amazed at what had happened. And Matthew 27: 59 So Joseph took the body, wrapped it in clean, fine linen, 60 and placed it in his new tomb, which he had cut into the rock. He left after rolling a great stone against the entrance of the tomb. So, the three synoptic gospels - Matthew, Mark and Luke - don't mention the head-wrapping, or the sudarion, but John does. Could this indicate that the sudarion was a smaller garment - one that would not have left much of an imprint on the Shroud? Possibly. But, again, I emphasize - The Shroud seems to allow for the existence of a head-scarf type wrapping, as well as ones around the wrists and feet. Rather than the Biblical account disproving The Shroud, it actually seems to describe it quite well. 5. THE ABUNDANCE OF FAKE RELICS PUT FORWARD BY MEDIEVAL CATHOLICS PROVES THE SHROUD IS ALSO FAKE.  St Honoratus has a body at Arles, and another at the island of Lerins, near Antibes.St Giles has a body at Toulouse, and a second in a town bearing his name in Languedoc.I could quote an infinite number of similar cases. I think that the exhibitors of these relics should at least have made some arrangement amongst themselves the better to conceal their barefaced impostures. Something of this sort was managed between the canons of Trêves and those of Liége about St Lambert's head. They compounded, for a sum of money, not to show publicly the head in their possession, in order to avoid the natural surprise of the public at the same relic being seen in two different towns situated so near to each other. But, as I have already remarked at the commencement of this treatise, the inventors of these frauds never imagined anyone could be found bold enough to speak out and expose their deceptions. This is really more of a subset of argument #1, and it is a fairly strong argument. However, it must be said that not every statement made by a dishonest person is a lie, and it is perfectly possible that not every relic claimed by the medieval Catholic church was fake. Most likely were. Were they ALL fake?  I'm not convinced they were.  So - Hopefully you've enjoyed this little bit of busting myths.  You can probably tell that I want the Shroud to be the real thing. There's several reasons for this, but none of them are apologetics-related. In other words, I don't want the Shroud to be the real burial cloth of Jesus because I think that would help prove the Bible to be reliable, or Jesus to be the resurrected Son of God. No article could prove such a thing. I do, however, want the Shroud to be real and genuine in the same sort of way that I want there to be a real Loch Ness Monster, or an extant Holy Grail somewhere out there. The world is a more interesting place with a legit Nessie swimming around in the cold waters of Scotland, and it is a more interesting place with real, tangible artifacts from the time of Jesus. Does that bias me? Possibly it does, and I don't want to enter this discussion biased. It does make me consider the claims of debunkers with a greater skepticism, however, and that might not be a bad thing.  I love John Calvin and am quite persuaded by his soteriological leanings in the realm of theology. That said, I believe his debunking of The Shroud is somewhat ham-handed, especially his contention that it is easily proved false by John 20 argument that the Bible says there were two different kinds of grave-clothes. I believe that there were indeed two different kinds of graveclothes used on Jesus - the Bible is explicit about this - there was a linen cloth that the body of Jesus was wrapped in, and a head covering (of some sort) that went along with it. That said, the Shroud appears to show evidence of there being a head scarf or head wrapping of some sort, and even if it didn't, one could easily see how the Shroud figure could have been wrapped in more than one cloth. I have little patience for people who believe the extraordinary simply because somebody told them it was so - gullibility is delightful in children, but unbecoming and unsophisticated in adults. I also have little patience for those who claim to debunk complex objects and possibilities with overly-simplistic and reductionist arguments. It is definitely possible - even plausible - that the Shroud of Turin is a medieval forgery, but the fact that John 20:7 mentions a sudarion that was on the head of Jesus does not necessarily debunk the authenticity of The Shroud in any sore of logical, philosophical or archaeological way.  Ok - that was a long episode. ONE more Shroud episode coming up - a summation of sorts. I hope to have 20-25 reasons to believe the Shroud could be authentic as well as a number of reasons to NOT believe in the authenticity of The Shroud. Thanks for being patient, and thanks for listening. Please leave a positive review if you are so inclined. 

He was born to a noble family in Maastricht (in modern-day Netherlands). When his spiritual father Bishop Theodard was killed in 671, St Lambert was elected Bishop of Maastricht despite his youth. He was loved by his flock for his holiness, ascetic labors and almsgiving, but was driven from his see in 675 after his patron King Childeric II was assasinated. He withdrew to the Monastery of Stavelot where he lived for seven years as one of the brethren, claiming no privileges despite his office. Once, getting up to pray during the night, he accidentally disturbed the monastic silence. The Abbot called out for whoever was responsible to do penance by standing barefoot in the snow before a cross outside the monastery church. In the morning the Abbot was dismayed to see the Bishop standing barefoot, covered with snow, before the cross, his face shining. The Abbot sought to apologize, but Lambert replied that he was honored to serve God like the Apostles, in cold and nakedness.   When King Pepin of Heristal took power in 681, he restored Lambert to his see, despite the Saint's desire to remain in obscurity. The holy bishop renewed his pastoral labors with vigor, visiting the most distant parishes and preaching the Gospel to the pagans who still inhabited the area, despite danger and threats. But when King Pepin put away his wife and replaced her with his concubine Alpais, St Lambert was the only Bishop who dared to rebuke him. For this he incurred the wrath of Alpais, who ordered his death. His assassins carried out their evil commission, even though they found a cross shining above the humble dwelling where he was staying.   Saint Lambert is one of the best-loved Saints of the Netherlands and Belgium, where many parish churches are dedicated to him. His relics are now in the Belgian city of Liège.

Lorsque je suis entré dans cette pâtisserie j’ai tout de suite réalisé que le propriétaire Fréderic Augustincic qui est aussi le chef, s’y connaît beaucoup en ce qui concerne les pâtisseries. Il a même un gâteau qui s’appelle Le Saint-Lambert et qui est seulement disponible ici.Anciennement connue sous le nom de Pâtisserie St-Lambert, et devenue Aux Beaux Tilleuls en 1998, c’est depuis 1950, à la même adresse au cœur du village que se retrouve une pâtisserie qui réjouit tous les gens qui la côtoie. La Pâtisserie Aux Beaux Tilleuls, c’est 20 ans de complicité avec tous les gourmets et gourmands de la Rive-Sud et les environs.Le chef et ses collaborateurs vous préparent tous les jours les meilleurs croissants et pâtisseries, tous fabriqués avec la même passion.Allez faire un tour :)REGARDER LA VIDÉO Pour connaître les propriétaires des entreprises et rester au courant de tout ce qui se passe à Brossard, Saint-Lambert, Saint-Hubert et Greenfield Park vous pouvez visiter le tout nouveau site web hyper localnbsp;PARKBENCH.COMPour des offres exclusives concernant l'achat ou la vente d'une propriété vous pouvez visiter LATOUCHEMAGIQUE.COMPour connaître l'état du marché immobilier et avoir accès à la liste de toutes les reprises de finance, vous pouvez visiter mon site webnbsp;DRAGOSRUXANDU.COM

Père Georges CARRAU, né en 1926, ordonné en 1957, vicaire des paroisses parisiennes ND du Rosaire, St-François-Xavier, St-Eloi, St-Lambert de Vaugirard, St-François-Xavier – catéchuménat à la Maison d’Ananie (2002-2010)

Geneviève Pettersen et Vanessa Destiné survolent l'actualité du jour: des résidents de St-Lambert se plaignent du bruit des spectacles sur l'Ile Ste-Hélène, retour sur les audiences publiques du projet de loi 21, AIRBNB et la crise de l'immobilier. 

Geneviève Pettersen et Vanessa Destiné survolent l'actualité du jour: des résidents de St-Lambert se plaignent du bruit des spectacles sur l'Ile Ste-Hélène, retour sur les audiences publiques du projet de loi 21, AIRBNB et la crise de l'immobilier.  Chronique de Vanessa Destiné: Des films sur la culture noire doublés par des acteurs blancs et le scandale de la secte NXIVM. Chronique de Master Bougaricci: Les enfants et l’argent. Une production de QUB radio Mai 2019

OK WOW que Chuck aime cet épisode. On apprend mieux le métier de notre invité André Péloquin, et on rit tout le long du deuxième sujet. Un podcast Mini-Wheats comme Chuck les aime. Au menu: André explique bien l’évolution de la perception du Sac de Chips à meme les autres journalistes, Nick pense qu’une fête d’enfant peut faire venir la police de St-Lambert, Vanessa fait tout un virage ethnique en parlant de sa pinata de rêve, Guy parle des sujets qu’il ne peut pas vraiment traiter durant son émission de radio et Chuck veut ruiner la fête de Jimmy-Sept-Ans. Bref, un show que tu ne peux juste pas manquer. Juste pas. Ciao!   André: http://www.facebook.com/andre.peloquin Nick: http://www.facebook.com/nicprovo Vanessa: http://www.facebook.com/vanessa.chandonnet Chuck: http://www.facebook.com/charles.tleduc   iTunes (On vous adore quand vous nous laissez ★★★★★): http://goo.gl/n1411W YouTube: http://goo.gl/K2kKOo Google Play: http://goo.gl/KUTKG4 Podbean: http://goo.gl/Hp7UPj   Twittinons ensemble:   André: http://twitter.com/andre_peloquin Nick: http://twitter.com/NickProvost Vanessa: http://twitter.com/lasorteuse Chuck: http://twitter.com/Chucktl Le Petit Bonheur: http://twitter.com/lepbonheur   Merci de nous suivre!

Bon week-end à tous! Un autre délectable show vient vous clôturer la semaine. Toujours avec le magnifique Team Luduc: Luduc a suivi les trucs de sommeil de Chuck, on est des fois surpris à ce que la bière peut nous procurer, Chuck et la bière à “effet NyQuil”, on porte des épingles à linge, Christian ne voyage jamais sans sa voitre, le road trip entre Charles et Luduc, les iPods et Nintendo Ds sont des incontournables en voyage, Luduc dort énormément en voyage, en voyage, Christian a besoin de sa nature, la peur de l'Halloween, la joie de la période de rush des bonbons, Luduc passe d’un “trou à un autre trou”, on parle de Lucboy, Luduc parle des avantages à vivre à Notre-Dame-du-Mont-Carmel, le plus beau qu’on peut faire à Luduc, Chuck raconte sa jeunesse à St-Lambert, Luduc et Christian jouent à la “game des médias sociaux, Luduc fête ses 10 ans sur Youtube bientôt et bien plus! Ton rendez-vous quotidien est arrivé pour clôre la semaine! Merci de votre écoute et à lundi!! Facebook - iTunes - Youtube - Stitcher La page de Luduc: https://www.facebook.com/luducart/ Le beau Charles: https://www.facebook.com/charles.desjardinslanglois?fref=ts Christian le sauté: https://www.facebook.com/jimplose Et vous suivez cette belle ribambelle sur: luduc.tv Twitter: Luduc: http://www.twitter.com/LucDuchesne LPB: http://www.twitter.com/lepbonheur Chuck: http://www.twitter.com/Chucktl

Re-bienvenue au Petit Bonheur! On entame notre première semaine de l’année avec vos 5 épisodes et avec les très comiques jeunes hommes du Geek Collectif! Aujourd’hui: On se moque de Chuck parce qu’il a le DVD du film Taxi, on salue “L’école de ski s’envoie en l’air”, on renomme Jonathan comme étant le “Youppi du web” on parle des futurs, on parle des films de Happy Madison, on parle de vieilles émissions, on parle de Spidermanning, Joe Bocan a déjà essayée de séduire Jonathan, on parles des millénials, Éric raconte son entrée prestigieuse au secondaire, l’histoire des Big-Mac secrets d’André, Jonathan et les ***avantages*** d’habiter en face de son école, on questionne l’existence de St-Lambert, Chuck raconte l’accident d’un homme mort électrocuté de son pénis, Jonathan se demande si les gens meurent dans les vidéos d’accidents graves, Chuck parle de la mort parfaite, l’accident dégueux d’André avec la gars d’Hydro, le gars qui a inventé le Segway qui est mort...en Segway, Éric et la mort bête d’un homme des montagnes, Chuck et les règles des profs d’escalade, Jonathan nous raconte l’histoire du cave qui s’est coupé en deux et beaucoup plus! On se rejoint demain pour encore plus de niaiseries! Ciao!Facebook - iTunes - Youtube - StitcherLe site de Geek Collectif: http://www.geekcollectif.com/Facebook du Geek Collectif: http://www.facebook.com/GeekCollectifLePodcast/Twitter:Geek Collectif: http://www.twitter.com/GeekCollectif LPB: http://www.twitter.com/lepbonheurÉric: http://www.twitter.com/MontrealienJonathan: http://www.twitter.com/ZombieMilterAndré: http://www.twitter.com/UzumakiQCChuck: http://www.twitter.com/Chucktl

C’est jeudi…et tu vas aimer ça. Épisode de feu pour toi: On cite du Sexe Illégal, Guillaume et sa coupe champignon de secondaire un, Chuck parlait de Durocher (la même de Vincent), l’envolée de colombes, Chuck devient une princesse (encore), Guillaume est un fanatique des armes, ordres alphabétiques pour les tables d’élèves, l’avantage des fenêtres en classe, Guillaume et son premier amour, Vincent parle de St-Lambert (ville de jeunesse de Chuck), Vincent dénigre totalement Chuck, on se demande toujours pourquoi le cinéma reste la sortie ultime. Passe une merveilleuse journée et à vendredi!Twitter - Facebook - iTunes - Youtube