Podcasts about district judge aileen cannon

It's June 9th, 2025, and the past few days in Donald Trump's legal world have been nothing short of a whirlwind. Wherever you look, Trump's name dominates the courtroom headlines—legal drama never seems far from the former president.Just last week, Trump's ongoing legal saga was marked by a remarkable sequence: four separate court losses reported within just hours of one another. These setbacks added to an already heavy legal calendar, where the courts from New York to Florida continue to shape not only his post-presidency legacy but also the political landscape as the 2024 election aftermath lingers.In New York, Donald Trump was sentenced on January 10, 2025, in a case that has drawn relentless national attention. The outcome—an unconditional discharge—meant he avoided jail time, but the courtroom battles were anything but over. Trump's lawyers quickly moved to appeal both the final decision and earlier summary judgments, ensuring the legal fights would continue. Letitia James, the New York Attorney General, successfully requested consolidation of these appeals, accelerating the appellate process through a single record and set of briefs.Meanwhile, in Florida, the classified documents case made headlines again. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, on July 15, 2024, had granted Trump's motion to dismiss the indictment based on questions around Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment and funding. The government's legal team counterpunched, filing an appeal with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The back-and-forth over classified documents—an issue that has haunted Trump since leaving office—remains unresolved, the case's fate depending on appellate rulings that could take months.Elsewhere, in Georgia, the legal chess match continued as Mark Meadows, Trump's former Chief of Staff, petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court after an unsuccessful attempt to move his own criminal case out of state court. Trump and his co-defendants are also appealing various procedural rulings by Georgia Judge Scott McAfee, with oral arguments grouped together for efficiency—a testament to the tangled nature of the sprawling Fulton County election interference case.In the Manhattan hush money prosecution, Trump sought once more to move District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case to federal court, but Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied his request, and the higher courts rejected subsequent appeals.One legal defeat might be news for any former president. For Donald Trump, four setbacks in a single day were just the latest chapter. The trials grind on, with lawyers on all sides burning the midnight oil, and the nation tuned in to every new development as the 2024 election's legal echoes ripple through 2025.

Just a few days ago, the latest chapter in Donald Trump's legal odyssey unfolded—one that's been captivating the nation. On May 30, 2024, in a packed New York City courtroom, a Manhattan jury delivered a historic verdict: former President Trump was found guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. This was the culmination of the People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, a case that began with accusations that Trump had manipulated financial documents to conceal information during the 2016 campaign. The trial, presided over by Justice Juan Merchan, started back on April 15, 2024, and the verdict marked the first time a former U.S. president was convicted of felony crimes after leaving office.The world watched as Justice Merchan handed down his sentence on January 10, 2025. Trump received an unconditional discharge, meaning he won't serve jail time but the felony convictions remain on his record. This outcome reverberated far beyond the courtroom, fueling debate across political, legal, and public spheres.But New York is only one front in Trump's legal battles. Down in Florida, another high-profile prosecution took center stage. On June 8, 2023, Trump, along with aides Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, was indicted in the Southern District of Florida, accused of retaining classified national defense information, obstructing justice, and making false statements. By July 15, 2024, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dropped the federal indictment, arguing that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment was flawed. The government swiftly appealed, but by November 29, 2024, the Justice Department dismissed its case against Trump, and by January 29, 2025, cases against his aides were dropped too.Trump's legal calendar is dense with ongoing appeals and litigation. In New York, Trump's legal team filed appeals against both Justice Engoron's earlier summary judgment and the final February 2024 decision in his civil fraud case. The Appellate Division, First Department, has consolidated these appeals, and the parties are in the thick of written arguments. Back in Georgia, legal wrangling continues in the sprawling case against Trump and allies over alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, with appeals regarding District Attorney Fani Willis's role all being heard together and oral arguments scheduled.Amid this legal storm, Donald Trump remains a dominant figure in American politics and headlines. Each courtroom drama brings new twists, sparking fierce reactions from supporters, critics, and legal experts alike. With appeals grinding forward and new legal challenges constantly surfacing, the courtroom battles involving the former president show no sign of slowing as the country follows every development.

It's been a whirlwind few days in the world of Donald Trump's legal battles. As I sit here on this Sunday morning, March 16, 2025, I can't help but reflect on the rollercoaster of events we've witnessed.Just last week, on March 14, the Department of Justice made a surprising move. They urged U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to keep Special Counsel Jack Smith's final report on Trump's handling of classified documents under wraps. This came mere hours after Trump publicly praised Judge Cannon, calling her "brilliant" and "the absolute model of what a judge should be." It's a stark contrast to the heated rhetoric we've seen in the past.But that's not all. The same day, a federal appeals court gave the green light for Trump to reinstate two controversial executive orders targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in federal agencies and government contractors. The three-judge panel from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a lower court's injunction, allowing the policy to be implemented while litigation continues. It's a significant win for the Trump administration, though the judges cautioned that overzealous enforcement could raise constitutional concerns.Meanwhile, the New York criminal case against Trump continues to make headlines. Remember, he was convicted on all 34 counts of falsifying business records back in May 2024. His sentencing, originally scheduled for January 10, 2025, was temporarily suspended following his November 2024 election victory. But now, we're all waiting with bated breath for the next development.Adding another layer to this legal saga, Trump recently asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on the issue of birthright citizenship. On March 13, his administration filed a request for the high court to allow enforcement of an executive order ending the guarantee of citizenship for virtually anyone born in the United States. It's a contentious issue that's sure to spark heated debate in the coming weeks.As we look ahead, there's no sign of these legal battles slowing down. Trump's team continues to fight on multiple fronts, challenging everything from election results to long-standing constitutional interpretations. Love him or hate him, there's no denying that Donald Trump remains at the center of some of the most consequential legal battles in recent American history.It's a lot to take in, and I can't help but wonder what the next few days will bring. Will we see more surprising court decisions? New executive orders? Or perhaps another unexpected twist in this ongoing legal drama? One thing's for certain – when it comes to Donald Trump and the law, expect the unexpected.

This Day in Legal History: Birth of NixonOn January 9, 1913, Richard Milhous Nixon was born in Yorba Linda, California, a man destined to leave a complicated and indelible mark on American history. Nixon is perhaps the most paradoxical of U.S. presidents—on one hand, he created the Environmental Protection Agency, championed detente with the Soviet Union, and opened diplomatic relations with China. On the other hand, the man also gave us Watergate, wiretapping, enemies lists, and enough shady political machinations to keep conspiracy theorists busy for decades.Nixon's "greatest hits" of questionable decisions include the secret bombing of Cambodia, illegally expanding the Vietnam War while publicly claiming to wind it down, and the sabotage of peace talks to ensure his election in 1968. Let's not forget his role in orchestrating the War on Drugs, a policy whose consequences are still felt today, particularly in communities of color. And, of course, he made liberal use of “plausible deniability,” whether it was about spying on political opponents or using government resources for personal vendettas.While Nixon may have soothed the environment by founding the EPA, he simultaneously polluted the political landscape, cementing cynicism in American politics for a generation. If you're struggling to reconcile his good deeds with his transgressions, don't worry—you're not alone. Historians, politicians, and everyday Americans have been wrestling with the Nixon conundrum for decades.Was he a political genius or a paranoid megalomaniac? Probably both, in addition to being a raging narcissist and, by all accounts, a deeply unpleasant man. His favorite breakfast? Cottage cheese with ketchup – or black pepper if he was feeling spicy. On this day in legal history, we remember Richard Nixon—a … man. He would have been 112 had a blood clot not cut him down as he prepared dinner in his Park Ridge, New Jersey home in 1994. The U.S. Justice Department announced that it will not publicly release Special Counsel Jack Smith's full report on Donald Trump's handling of classified records, citing ongoing prosecutions against two Trump associates, Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. While the report's section addressing Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election will be made public, the documents-related portion will remain accessible only to specific members of Congress responsible for oversight.Attorney General Merrick Garland confirmed that Smith completed a two-volume report on Trump, with the Justice Department stating that limited disclosure would balance public interest with protecting the legal rights of Nauta and De Oliveira. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the release of the report upon a request by the two defendants.Previously, Trump was charged with illegally retaining classified records and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them, as well as attempting to interfere with the certification of President Joe Biden's election victory. However, the department dismissed these charges after Trump's November election, adhering to its policy against prosecuting a sitting president.Despite these dismissals, prosecutors are seeking to revive the obstruction case against Nauta and De Oliveira, who have pleaded not guilty. The Justice Department emphasized that its actions comply with federal regulations requiring a final report from special counsel investigations.US Justice Dept will not publicly release all of special counsel report on TrumpPresident-elect Donald Trump has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to halt his sentencing in a New York criminal case involving hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels. In a filing made public on Wednesday, his lawyers argued that further proceedings in the Manhattan state court would harm the presidency and federal government operations, citing presidential immunity.The New York appeals court recently rejected Trump's effort to delay sentencing, scheduled for Friday. His legal team has requested similar emergency relief from both the Supreme Court and New York's highest court. The Supreme Court has asked prosecutors to respond by Thursday, suggesting a swift decision is likely.Trump was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 payment by his former attorney Michael Cohen to Daniels before the 2016 election. He denies any wrongdoing or the alleged sexual encounter with Daniels. His sentencing judge indicated Trump would likely face an unconditional discharge, leaving a judgment of guilt on record but imposing no jail time, fines, or probation.Trump's lawyers contend the case violates principles of presidential immunity established by a Supreme Court ruling granting former presidents broad protection from prosecution for official acts. They argue this immunity applies during the transitional period between his election and inauguration. Manhattan prosecutors have vowed to respond to Trump's request, marking the latest development in a historic case that made Trump the first U.S. president to be criminally convicted.Trump asks Supreme Court to halt sentencing in New York hush money case | ReutersZwillGen, a law firm specializing in technology and privacy law, has expanded into artificial intelligence with the acquisition of Luminos.Law, a Washington, D.C.-based firm focused on AI and analytics risk. The merger adds six attorneys and data scientists to ZwillGen's team, enabling the firm to offer services in AI bias and cybersecurity testing, which are increasingly in demand amid regulatory scrutiny.ZwillGen, founded in 2010, now employs over 45 attorneys across offices in Washington, New York, Chicago, and San Francisco, with a total headcount of about 125, including subsidiaries specializing in subpoenas and gaming licensing. Its high-profile clients include Airbnb, Bose, DoorDash, NBCUniversal, and The New York Times.Luminos.Law, established five years ago, spun off a separate software company, Luminos.AI, in 2024 to offer custom AI risk management software on an enterprise platform. While Luminos.AI remains independent, Andrew Burt, co-founder of Luminos.Law, will focus on the software company while serving as a legal advisor to ZwillGen's new AI unit. Brenda Leong, also from Luminos, will lead ZwillGen's AI division.The deal is part of a broader trend of law firm mergers in 2025, particularly among small firms, as demand for legal expertise in emerging technologies grows.Tech, AI lawyers join forces in latest US law firm merger | ReutersIn my latest piece for Forbes, I talk about taxing oil wells. The United States is grappling with a crisis of orphaned and uncapped oil wells—sites with no accountable owner and no proper closure. These wells pose significant environmental and public health risks, leaking methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and contaminating groundwater. Estimates suggest there are between 310,000 and 800,000 undocumented orphan wells, with over 120,000 already identified as uncapped. Addressing this problem is critical, but the cost—ranging from tens of thousands to millions of dollars per well—is increasingly falling on taxpayers.The root of this issue lies in systemic regulatory failures and cost-shifting practices within the oil and gas industry. Older wells are often sold to smaller operators who lack the resources to maintain or cap them. When these operators go bankrupt, liabilities are abandoned. Bonding requirements meant to ensure cleanup funds are woefully inadequate, typically covering less than 2% of the actual cost.To tackle this crisis, I propose an Environmental Liability Tax (ELT) on oil and gas extraction. Levied per barrel, this tax would ensure that cleanup costs are collected upfront, placing the financial responsibility on the companies benefiting economically from the wells. Funds from the ELT could be held in state or federal trusts dedicated to plugging orphaned wells and restoring lands.The ELT could also incentivize better practices by offering tax credits to companies proactively addressing environmental risks. By taxing extraction rather than chasing bankrupt operators, the ELT would create a sustainable, enforceable funding mechanism to address this growing environmental liability. As the U.S. approaches peak oil, the time for systemic reform is now—before the cleanup bill comes due with no one left to pay.Towards An Environmental Liability Tax For Oil And Gas Wells This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Tuesday that the company plans to end its fact-checking program as part of a broader overhaul of how it moderates content on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. In a video, Zuckerberg said the move was an effort to prioritize "free expression" and called the 2024 election a "cultural tipping point." It was a notable policy shift ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration in a little more than week. Jason Koebler, co-founder of the tech website 404 Media, breaks down why the tech elites are sucking up to Trump.And in headlines: U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the Justice Department from releasing Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on his investigations into Trump, Trump doesn't rule out using military force to acquire Greenland and the Panama Canal, and the conservative North Carolina Supreme Court blocked certifying the election results of one of its Democratic colleagues.Show Notes:Check out Jason's work – https://www.404media.co/Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

Tuesday, January 7, 2025 Subscribe: Get the Daily Update in your inbox for free 1/ A federal judge in Florida temporarily blocked the Justice Department from releasing special counsel Jack Smith's report on Trump's classified documents investigation. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon justified her order “to preserve the statu... Visit WTF Just Happened Today? for more news and headlines, brought to you by Matt Kiser. The WTFJHT Podcast is narrated and produced by Joe Amditis.

President-elect Donald Trump announced that a billionaire from Dubai is investing $20 billion in the United States to build new data centers across multiple states. Trump also stated that he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon blocked the public release of special counsel Jack Smith's final report on his investigations into Trump. Meanwhile, a New York appeals court judge rejected Trump's attempt to delay his sentencing in the New York criminal case.The remains of former President Jimmy Carter were transported from Atlanta, Georgia, to Washington for funeral services. His casket now lies in state at the Capitol, where members of Congress have begun paying their respects.Firefighters in Los Angeles scrambled to contain a fast-moving wildfire as a potentially "life-threatening, destructive" windstorm hit Southern California. Forecasters warned that the worst may be yet to come, with the windstorm predicted to last for days.

In an excerpt from a new episode of the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance break down the superseding indictment against former President Donald Trump in the election interference case brought by special counsel Jack Smith in D.C. In the full episode, Preet and Joyce discuss: – Smith's brief urging the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate the charges against Trump in the classified documents case in Florida, which U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon recently threw out; and – The controversial arrest of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov in France and the criminal charges accusing him of allowing criminal activity on his messaging app. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. To become a member of CAFE Insider head to cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. Subscribe to The Counsel for free to get more news at the intersection of law and politics each week. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In July, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed a criminal case charging former President Donald Trump with hoarding classified documents at his home in Mar-a-Lago and obstructing justice. Judge Cannon reasoned that the prosecutor in this case, Special Counsel Jack Smith, was not properly appointed by the Justice Department. Matthew Seligman of Stanford Law School and Josh Blackman of the South Texas College of Law Houston, who argued before Judge Cannon on opposite sides of this issue, join Jeffrey Rosen to debate the legal basis for the special counsel role. Resources:  United States v. Nixon (1974)  Trump v. United States (2024)  Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, Brief of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and Landmark Legal Foundation as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant Trump's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment, United States v. Trump (March 21, 2024)  Matthew Seligman, Motion for Leave to File Brief by Constitutional Lawyers, Former Government Officials, and State Democracy Defenders Action as Amici Curiae in Opposition to Defendant Donald J. Trump's Motion to Dismiss, United States v. Trump (April 3, 2024)  Judge Aileen Cannon, Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment Based on Appointments Clause Violation, United States v. Trump (July 15, 2024)  Jack Smith, Brief for the United States, United States v. Trump, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (August 26, 2024)  Stay Connected and Learn More: Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.   Continue today's conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.   Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.  You can find transcripts for each episode on the podcast pages in our Media Library. Donate

August 27, 2024 ~ Special counsel Jack Smith asked an appeals court to overturn U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's dismissal of the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump. Guy, Lloyd, and Jamie talk with Honigman Law partner about the legal standing of Smith's request, and the timeline ahead of the November election.

In an excerpt from a new episode of the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance break down President Joe Biden's proposal for term limits for Supreme Court justices. In the full episode, they further discuss Biden's proposed Supreme Court reforms, including an ethics code and a Constitutional amendment declaring that former presidents do not have immunity from criminal prosecution. Preet and Joyce also analyze the developments in former President Donald Trump's criminal cases: – Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's brief urging a New York judge to uphold Trump's Manhattan conviction, arguing the Supreme Court's recent immunity decision has no bearing on the case;  – Next steps once U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan regains control of Trump's prosecution in the D.C. election interference case following the Supreme Court immunity ruling; and  – Special counsel Jack Smith's forthcoming appeal of U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's order dismissing the charges against Trump in the classified documents case. Subscribe to The Counsel for free to get more news at the intersection of law and politics each week. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. To become a member of CAFE Insider head to cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Mike Ferguson in the Morning 07-19-24 Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy joins Fox News' Greg Jarrett to discuss why he believes a key legal clause takes away special council Jack Smith's authority to prosecute, how the Supreme Court's immunity decision impacts other Trump legal cases, and the role of politicized prosecutions in the 2024 race. In Florida, it's another legal victory for former President Trump and another legal setback for Jack Smith. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the criminal case against the former President's illegal handling of classified documents, a decision the Department of Justice says they plan to appeal.  NewsTalkSTL website: https://newstalkstl.com/ Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/NewsTalkSTL Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/NewstalkSTL Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NewsTalkSTL Livestream 24/7: http://bit.ly/newstalkstlstreamSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Legal Eagles - Josh Hammer and Mike Donnelly fill out today's legal panel. They discuss Donald Trump's massive win as his classified documents case was dismissed by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. With all the talk about the RNC abortion platform, there are major issues with our “separation of church and state”. Finally, if elected for a second term, what should be the vetting process be for federal judicial appointees under Trump? Carly Atchison - Another breaking story yesterday was Donald Trump's selection of J.D. Vance as his running mate for the 2024 election. There are some who are skeptical of the nomination but Carly Atchison tells us why republicans can get behind him. Jon Root - The RNC is under way and there are republicans who are concerned about the direction of the party. The Log Cabin Republicans who stand for LGBTQ rights and want a more inclusive party, approved the new platform and called it a “historic moment”. What is the real direction of the RNC?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Days after the attempted assassination of former President Trump, he appeared at the first night of the Republican National Convention. The convention's opening day unveiled the Trump-Vance 2024 ticket, as Ohio Senator JD Vance was selected as the GOP's vice presidential nominee. The theme of the first night, "Making America Wealthy Again," featured speakers focusing on the economy and how a second Trump administration would further American prosperity. FOX News Radio Political Anchor Jared Halpern and FOX News Radio Political Analyst Josh Kraushaar join the Rundown to talk about President Trump's first public appearance since the attempt on his life, the significance of the Senator Vance VP pick, and if the economic message will resonate with voters in November. In Florida, another legal victory for former President Trump and another legal setback for special counsel Jack Smith. On Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the criminal case against the former President's illegal handling of classified documents, a decision the Department of Justice says they plan to appeal. FOX News contributor and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy joins to discuss why he believes a key legal clause takes away Jack Smith's authority to prosecute, how the Supreme Court's immunity decision impacts other Trump legal cases, and the role of politicized prosecutions in the 2024 race. Plus, commentary by columnist David Marcus. Photo Credit: AP Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)

ICYMI: Hour One of ‘Later, with Mo'Kelly' Presents – In-depth analysis of the attempted assassination of former President Donald J. Trump…PLUS - Thoughts on U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissing the Florida classified documents case against the former president AND Trump selecting JD Vance as his Vice President at the RNC & MORE - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app

Eric Zorn, Publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, joins John Williams to talk about Mincing Rascal Brandon Pope’s viral tweet on Milwaukee food, the assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump, Trump picking JD Vance to be his running mate, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissing the Trump classified documents case, and NBC pulling ‘Morning Joe’ off the […]

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:18)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Eric Zorn, Publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, joins John Williams to talk about Mincing Rascal Brandon Pope’s viral tweet on Milwaukee food, the assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump, Trump picking JD Vance to be his running mate, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissing the Trump classified documents case, and NBC pulling ‘Morning Joe’ off the […]

Days after the attempted assassination of former President Trump, he appeared at the first night of the Republican National Convention. The convention's opening day unveiled the Trump-Vance 2024 ticket, as Ohio Senator JD Vance was selected as the GOP's vice presidential nominee. The theme of the first night, "Making America Wealthy Again," featured speakers focusing on the economy and how a second Trump administration would further American prosperity. FOX News Radio Political Anchor Jared Halpern and FOX News Radio Political Analyst Josh Kraushaar join the Rundown to talk about President Trump's first public appearance since the attempt on his life, the significance of the Senator Vance VP pick, and if the economic message will resonate with voters in November. In Florida, another legal victory for former President Trump and another legal setback for special counsel Jack Smith. On Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the criminal case against the former President's illegal handling of classified documents, a decision the Department of Justice says they plan to appeal. FOX News contributor and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy joins to discuss why he believes a key legal clause takes away Jack Smith's authority to prosecute, how the Supreme Court's immunity decision impacts other Trump legal cases, and the role of politicized prosecutions in the 2024 race. Plus, commentary by columnist David Marcus. Photo Credit: AP Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Eric Zorn, Publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, joins John Williams to talk about Mincing Rascal Brandon Pope’s viral tweet on Milwaukee food, the assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump, Trump picking JD Vance to be his running mate, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissing the Trump classified documents case, and NBC pulling ‘Morning Joe’ off the […]

Days after the attempted assassination of former President Trump, he appeared at the first night of the Republican National Convention. The convention's opening day unveiled the Trump-Vance 2024 ticket, as Ohio Senator JD Vance was selected as the GOP's vice presidential nominee. The theme of the first night, "Making America Wealthy Again," featured speakers focusing on the economy and how a second Trump administration would further American prosperity. FOX News Radio Political Anchor Jared Halpern and FOX News Radio Political Analyst Josh Kraushaar join the Rundown to talk about President Trump's first public appearance since the attempt on his life, the significance of the Senator Vance VP pick, and if the economic message will resonate with voters in November. In Florida, another legal victory for former President Trump and another legal setback for special counsel Jack Smith. On Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the criminal case against the former President's illegal handling of classified documents, a decision the Department of Justice says they plan to appeal. FOX News contributor and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy joins to discuss why he believes a key legal clause takes away Jack Smith's authority to prosecute, how the Supreme Court's immunity decision impacts other Trump legal cases, and the role of politicized prosecutions in the 2024 race. Plus, commentary by columnist David Marcus. Photo Credit: AP Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In a major ruling, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday granted former President Donald Trump's request to dismiss his classified documents case. She ruled that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unlawful under the Constitution's Appointments Clause. The Republican National Convention begins in Milwaukee Monday, where former President Trump is expected to formally accept the Republican nomination for president. The former president said he has rewritten his speech for the convention following Saturday's assassination attempt. U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle said the agency will “participate fully” in an investigation into the assassination attempt on former President Trump and work with Congress on “any oversight action.” She expressed confidence in the agency's security plan for the Republican National Convention. ⭕️Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

In a major ruling, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday granted former President Donald Trump's request to dismiss his classified documents case. She ruled that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unlawful under the Constitution's Appointments Clause.The Republican National Convention begins in Milwaukee Monday, where former President Trump is expected to formally accept the Republican nomination for president. The former president said he has rewritten his speech for the convention following Saturday's assassination attempt.U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle said the agency will “participate fully” in an investigation into the assassination attempt on former President Trump and work with Congress on “any oversight action.” She expressed confidence in the agency's security plan for the Republican National Convention.

The illegal documents case against Donald Trump, prosecuted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, centers on allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving the presidency. These documents, which included sensitive national security information, were not returned despite multiple requests from the government.In June 2023, Trump was charged with multiple counts, including obstruction of justice and willful retention of national defense information. Trump's legal team has argued that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, claiming he lacked the authority to prosecute the case. This argument was taken seriously by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, leading to extensive hearings on the matter.The Justice Department maintains that Smith's appointment followed legal protocols and that he operates under the Attorney General's oversight. However, the case has been complicated by legal challenges and procedural debates, reflecting the contentious nature of this high-profile prosecution​.Now, after all the back and forth and money spent, Judge Cannon has dismissed the case against Donald Trump  and in this episode we begin taking a look at that order and why she says the case had to be dismissed.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:cannon.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In an excerpt from a new episode of the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance break down the new Louisiana law requiring public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments. They also preview the ACLU's lawsuit challenging the law under the First Amendment. In the full episode, Preet and Joyce discuss:  – The Florida hearings during which District Judge Aileen Cannon appeared skeptical of former President Donald Trump's arguments challenging special counsel Jack Smith's appointment as unlawful; and – A federal judge's order freezing enforcement of Iowa's controversial immigration law, which makes it a state crime to enter the country, and the state of Iowa, illegally. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. To become a member of CAFE Insider head to cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

According to a report from The New York Times, two federal judges in south Florida urged District Judge Aileen Cannon to forgo overseeing the criminal prosecution of former President Trump when she was first assigned the classified documents case. Plus, new audio reveals Trump saying he “lost the election.”  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A recent legal revelation has led former President Donald Trump to question the integrity of the Biden administration's Justice Department, suggesting that strong measures be taken against special counsel Jack Smith. A highly controversial admission in a court filing has set this chain of events in motion. It revolves around a case concerning classified documents linked to President Trump, and it was revealed to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who is adjudicating the matter. The core issue lies in the fact that the evidence in the classified document case is no longer in the same condition, according to prosecutors. They had to concede that the evidence is not in its 'original, intact' state. This unexpected turn of events raised Trump's ire, leading him to demand that special counsel Smith be held accountable. Smith's office was left with no choice but to confess that this startling revelation was a clear contradiction of what they had initially communicated to the court. Previously, it had been stated that the only modifications to the content were the removal of specific classified documents and the inclusion of substitutes to these documents, stirring a whirl of controversy. These details surfaced during a legal filing in response to Walt Nauta's plea for additional time to process the clutter of seized documents. The court filing contained meticulous information, including which records were placed in which storage units and the particular order of these documents. This detailed filing, however, revealed an unsettling inconsistency.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Smallpox EradicatedOn May 8, 1980, a landmark moment in public health and legal history was achieved when the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared smallpox eradicated. This declaration came in the form of Resolution WHA33.3, marking an unprecedented victory in the battle against infectious diseases. Smallpox, a devastating disease known for its brutal impact on human health and its high mortality rates, became the first disease to be eradicated by human effort.The journey to eradication was spearheaded by the WHO's Intensified Eradication Program, which began in 1967. This global effort was a monumental example of international cooperation, involving mass vaccination campaigns and rigorous surveillance practices across numerous countries. The legal framework provided by WHO played a crucial role, facilitating cooperation and compliance among member states.The eradication of smallpox was significant not only for its immediate health benefits but also for setting a precedent for global health governance. It demonstrated the power of collective human action guided by international law and cooperation. The resolution also led to the establishment of norms and practices that have influenced how global health issues are managed, including strategies for vaccine distribution and disease surveillance.Moreover, the eradication of smallpox has had lasting impacts on the legal aspects of public health. It has informed the international legal principles concerning the handling of biological samples, as the remaining samples of the virus are now held under strict legal and security controls to prevent any potential outbreaks.In the wake of smallpox eradication, the world saw the potential of what could be achieved when countries unite under a common cause. This success has inspired ongoing efforts to combat other infectious diseases, such as polio and malaria, through similar international frameworks.Today, the eradication of smallpox remains a testament to what can be accomplished through coordinated global public health initiatives backed by international legal agreements. It stands as a beacon of hope and a model that continues to influence global health diplomacy and international legal frameworks dealing with health emergencies.Robert D. White, a North Carolina landowner, is involved in a significant legal battle that has reached the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging the Clean Water Act's regulations concerning wetlands. The case revolves around whether parts of White's property along the Pasquotank River are distinguishable from the river itself, which would affect their classification as protected wetlands under federal law. This follows the Supreme Court's precedent in Sackett v. EPA, which tightened federal jurisdiction over wetlands by requiring a "continuous surface connection" making them indistinguishable from larger navigable waters.White's attorneys argue that the Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation expands the definition of federally protected waters beyond what the Supreme Court's decision allows. The Justice Department, however, maintains that wetlands only need to abut larger bodies of water to qualify for protection. White's case underscores a broader legal and environmental debate about the scope of federal authority under the Clean Water Act, particularly following the Sackett decision.If White's challenge succeeds, it could significantly narrow the scope of wetland protections under the Clean Water Act, affecting nearly all U.S. wetlands. This legal challenge has broader implications for environmental protection regulations and property development rights, especially in how wetlands are federally categorized and protected. The outcome could set a precedent affecting the balance between environmental conservation and property rights across the nation.North Carolina Landowner Aims Wetlands Lawsuit at Supreme CourtThe U.S. House of Representatives, dominated by Republicans, was unable to override President Joe Biden's veto of a resolution aimed at overturning the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) new joint employer rule. The vote ended with 214 in favor and 191 against, failing to meet the two-thirds majority needed to override a presidential veto. The joint employer rule, which eases the criteria for determining when two companies are considered joint employers responsible for negotiating with unions and liable for labor violations, has faced strong opposition from Republicans and business groups. They argue that the rule could increase regulatory costs and negatively impact employment. Despite the legislative setback, the rule's implementation has been halted by a federal judge in Texas as of March, keeping it from taking effect for now.House Fails to Override Biden Veto of Joint Employer ResolutionTikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to block a new U.S. law that mandates ByteDance to divest its ownership of TikTok or face a ban on the app. This law, signed by President Joe Biden on April 24, targets the app which is used by 170 million Americans. The companies argue that the law infringes on First Amendment rights and is not feasible either commercially, technologically, or legally, claiming it would lead to TikTok's shutdown by January 19, 2025.The White House aims to remove Chinese ownership of TikTok citing national security concerns but prefers not to ban the app. The legal challenge is part of TikTok's broader effort to counteract what it views as a politically driven campaign against it, emphasizing its substantial investments in securing U.S. user data. The lawsuit also contends with interpretations of ByteDance's ownership structure and the feasibility of transferring TikTok's operations to a U.S. company, highlighting the technical and logistical complexities involved.This case is a continuation of the long-standing tensions between the U.S. and China over control and security of internet and technology, reflecting broader geopolitical conflicts over digital security and economic power.TikTok, ByteDance sue to block US law seeking sale or ban of app | ReutersThe trial of Sung Kook "Bill" Hwang, founder of Archegos Capital Management, is set to begin with jury selection this week in Manhattan federal court. Hwang and his former Chief Financial Officer, Patrick Halligan, are accused of racketeering and multiple counts of fraud and market manipulation related to the dramatic collapse of Archegos in March 2021. The prosecution alleges that Hwang used derivatives to covertly accumulate large stock positions, inflating stock prices and misleading banks to maintain crucial business relationships. Both Hwang and Halligan have pleaded not guilty, disputing the charges as an overreach of legal theories on market manipulation.Archegos Capital Management was a private investment firm that functioned as a family office, avoiding some regulations that typically apply to other investment entities. At its peak, Archegos managed $36 billion in assets and had a staggering $160 billion in exposure to equities. The firm's downfall was triggered by a swift drop in stock prices, leading to massive losses as banks called in their loans and liquidated holdings. This collapse resulted in over $100 billion in shareholder losses across various companies within Archegos's portfolio, impacting major banks like Credit Suisse and Nomura Holdings. The trial is expected to be complex and lengthy, with both Hwang's former head trader and Chief Risk Officer having pleaded guilty to related charges and set to testify.Bill Hwang's trial begins over collapse of his $36 billion Archegos fund | ReutersThe start of Donald Trump's federal trial in Florida, where he faces charges related to illegally retaining classified documents, has been indefinitely postponed. Originally set for May 20, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon did not schedule a new date, instead setting pre-trial hearings through July 22. This delay lessens the likelihood that Trump will stand trial before the November 5 U.S. election. Both the prosecution and defense had agreed the initial date was unfeasible.Trump has pleaded not guilty to 40 counts, which include accusations of storing sensitive national security documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate and obstructing the government's efforts to retrieve them. The delay in this case parallels challenges in another federal case concerning Trump's actions related to the 2020 election, where the Supreme Court may grant him some immunity as a former president.Legal experts suggest that the timing of these trials, close to the election, could lead to claims of election interference. A potential win for Trump in the upcoming election could further complicate matters, as he could influence the continuation of these federal cases as president. Despite ongoing proceedings in other legal matters, including a New York state trial, Trump maintains that all charges against him are politically motivated.Trump documents trial start delayed indefinitely, judge orders | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

An explosive revelation in a recent court filing has spurred calls from former President Donald Trump for Joe Biden's Justice Department to take legal action against special counsel Jack Smith. The controversial admission pertains to a mishandling of 'evidence' in a high-stakes case revolving around classified documents. Smith's team informed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon that certain evidence wasn't maintained in its original state, a revelation that rocked Trump camp and raised eyebrows across the nation. In a shocking turn of events, Smith's office concurred that this assertion contradicts what they had initially reported to the court. Initially, they had painted a different picture, stating that the changes made to the evidence predominantly included the extraction of specific classified materials and subsequent insertion of stand-in materials. The unexpected admission of inconsistency from Smith's office has spiked national interest and has driven a surge of support for Trump, thanks to this politically charged narrative. The court filing in question pertained to the plea of defendant Walt Nauta who sought additional time to internalise the seized documents in a case focused on classified documents. It apparently pointed out the specific location of different documents within various boxes and also detailed the correct order of the documents in each box. All this has been brought to light by Smith's filing which has unwittingly stoked the fire of this political drama. A significant discrepancy unearthed by Smith's disclosure is the mismatch in the current arrangement of the boxes to the previous scans obtained, an inconsistency that legal mavens consider problematic. This revelation adds to the mounting pile of concerns for the prosecution, potentially complicating an already politically fraught case.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Donald Trump suffered two setbacks as judges rejected his bids to dismiss criminal charges in the Georgia election interference case and the classified documents case. In Florida, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon rejected Trump's argument that he could retain classified documents based on the Presidential Records Act. In Georgia, Judge Scott McAfee rejected Trump's argument that the attempts to overturn the 2020 election were protected under the First Amendment. Plus, "No Labels" abandons its plans to field a third-party candidate in the 2024 Presidential Election. The group had been pursuing a "unity ticket," featuring centrist candidates who could serve as alternatives to voters unsatisfied with Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Then, excitement is growing for Monday's solar eclipse – the first in six years. Joyce Vance, Molly Jong-Fast, Peter Baker, Jen Palmieri, Tim Miller, Jim Sciutto, and Sean Wilentz join. 

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will not dismiss the former president's classified documents case based on his claim he had the authority to take classified or sensitive documents under The Presidential Records Act. But in the same order, Judge Cannon also pushed back against special counsel Jack Smith's request that she make a final decision on whether the theory can be used at the trial, so that prosecutors could appeal to the 11th Circuit. Former federal judge Nancy Gertner joins AC360 to discuss Judge Cannon's ruling. Plus, Gary Tuchman travels to Cairo, Illinois to see how residents are preparing for the influx of eclipse seekers they'll get on Monday. The city is one of several in the country that will experience eclipse totality, and those who live there are excited about the prospect of tourists, and the boost to the economy they'll bring.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This Day in Legal History: ConscriptionOn April 1, 1863, the United States found itself in a pivotal moment of the Civil War, instituting the first wartime conscription law in its history. This legislation marked a significant departure from previous volunteer-based military enlistment, reflecting the dire need for manpower in the ongoing conflict. Intriguingly, the law contained a clause that permitted individuals to pay a $300 fee to avoid military service, a provision that starkly highlighted socioeconomic disparities and led to widespread controversy. Dubbed the "rich man's exception," this clause ignited fervent opposition, particularly among the working-class population who could not afford such a sum.The palpable tension and discontent culminated in the July 1863 New York City Draft Riots, a devastating uprising that stands as the deadliest civil insurrection in the United States up to that point. Over the course of several days, as many as 100 people lost their lives in violent confrontations, with extensive property damage across the city. The riots were eventually suppressed by Union troops, some of whom had been diverted from their post at the recent Battle of Gettysburg, highlighting the severity of the internal strife.The 1863 Draft Riots serve as a stark reminder of the deep-seated issues of inequality and social injustice that can lead to turmoil within a nation, especially during times of great stress and uncertainty. These events also underscore the complexities and challenges of wartime governance, revealing the profound impacts of policy decisions on the fabric of society. The aftermath of the riots forced a reevaluation of conscription practices and left an indelible mark on the nation's history, illustrating the turbulent intersection of military necessity and civil rights.Florida State University and Clemson University are challenging the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) with antitrust and contract claims, initiating a legal battle with far-reaching implications for college sports. The controversy revolves around the ACC's exit fees and television broadcast rights, with the schools arguing that these terms are anticompetitively high and lock them into an underperforming conference. More than half a billion dollars are at stake, with the lawsuits questioning whether the ACC's penalties for leaving the conference—amounting to $572 million according to FSU—constitute an unlawful restraint on trade and are unconscionable.The litigation has sparked a complex legal fight over the choice of venue, with the ACC seeking to keep the case in its home state of North Carolina, while FSU and Clemson filed their lawsuits in Florida and South Carolina, respectively. The schools argue that the ACC's long-term television deals, which extend through 2036, are financially disadvantageous compared to those secured by other conferences, leading to significant revenue losses.Clemson's lawsuit further emphasizes the financial disparity, pointing out that ACC members earn roughly $30 million less annually than counterparts in the Big 10 and SEC. Despite these claims, the ACC insists that the contractual agreements, which were signed by the universities, are binding and exclusive, arguing against the notion that a contract is only valid "so long as it chooses."Legal experts suggest that the arguments presented by FSU and Clemson, particularly regarding the unconscionable nature of the exit penalties, typically apply more to consumers or employees rather than entities like universities that actively participated in forming the agreements. The outcome of this legal battle could significantly influence the structure of college sports conferences, with a settlement to buy out of the conference seen as a likely resolution. However, the decision on where the case will be litigated could greatly affect the ruling, highlighting the strategic importance of home-field advantage in legal proceedings.Florida State, Clemson Test Antitrust and Contract Attack on ACCIn a significant development in the criminal case against former U.S. President Donald Trump, accused of mishandling classified documents, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, has shown openness to Trump's defense arguments. This has raised concerns for prosecutors regarding the challenges they may encounter as the case progresses. Judge Cannon has requested both Trump and the prosecutors to submit jury instructions for scenarios that could favor Trump's claims, which legal experts argue have limited relevance to the charges at hand. Trump's defense contends that he retained the classified documents as personal property under a law that allows former presidents to keep certain records, a stance prosecutors dispute given the nature of the documents related to national security.This case is one of four legal battles Trump faces amidst his campaign to return to the presidency, portraying these legal actions as politically motivated attempts to undermine his candidacy. The judge's receptiveness to Trump's arguments, particularly on the matter of how the classified documents are categorized, introduces a unique dynamic into the proceedings, potentially influencing the trial's outcome. Legal professionals have noted the rarity of a president declaring government-produced documents as personal, emphasizing the advantage this argument could afford Trump in a jury trial.Despite this potential advantage, a trial date remains uncertain, with discussions ongoing about postponing the currently scheduled trial. Meanwhile, Judge Cannon has previously ruled in Trump's favor in preliminary matters, though she has also rejected attempts to dismiss the central charge against him, indicating some arguments merit further examination. This nuanced legal battle reflects the complexities of addressing classified information handling and the implications of presidential records management, setting a precedent for how such cases might be adjudicated in the future.US judge receptive to Trump documents claims in warning sign for prosecutors | ReutersTesla Inc. is required to confront allegations from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) asserting that the company allowed severe racial harassment against Black employees at its Fremont, California, manufacturing plant starting in May 2015. Federal Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley ruled that the EEOC's claims are sufficient to suggest the harassment was intense enough to create an abusive work environment. This decision is part of ongoing legal challenges Tesla faces regarding race bias, highlighted by a separate case where a Tesla employee was awarded $3.2 million in damages for discrimination.The EEOC's lawsuit, filed last year, charges Tesla with maintaining a racially hostile environment, characterized by the frequent use of racial slurs and graffiti, contributing to a workplace permeated with discrimination. Judge Corley dismissed Tesla's motion to have the case dismissed or stayed pending the resolution of similar state court cases, indicating those proceedings wouldn't resolve the federal lawsuit's issues.Corley also refuted Tesla's claim that the EEOC didn't properly engage in pre-suit conciliation efforts as mandated by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, noting the EEOC had indeed informed Tesla of the allegations and attempted conciliation for nearly a year. The case underscores the legal scrutiny Tesla faces over its workplace culture and practices, with Corley's ruling marking a significant step in the litigation process. Tesla's representation and the company's response to the ruling were not immediately available.Tesla Loses Bid to End EEOC Racial Harassment, Retaliation SuitTennessee has introduced the first state legislation, known as the ELVIS Act, in response to concerns over the use of artificial intelligence to replicate musicians' voices, including a viral AI-generated song mimicking Drake and The Weeknd. Enacted on March 21 and effective from July 1, this law aims to protect commercial exploitation of recognizable voices, extending beyond celebrities to any identifiable individual. It's a response to the evolving capabilities of AI, which can now produce high-quality voice replications easily accessible to the masses, posing a significant challenge to the music industry and intellectual property rights.The law expands on Tennessee's prior right of publicity law, influenced heavily by Elvis Presley's estate, to now include liability for those making tools intended for replicating an individual's voice without authorization. This broad scope of protection has raised concerns about its implications on free speech and the First Amendment, with some experts pointing out its potential to limit more expressive uses of voice replication, such as tribute bands or parody.The legislation's implications extend beyond merely preventing unauthorized commercial use, touching on broader First Amendment concerns and potentially influencing how similar laws might be structured in other states. Despite aiming to prevent commercial exploitation, the law does not strictly limit the right to an advertising context, keeping a carve-out for fair use in news, public affairs, or sports broadcasts as protected by the First Amendment.Furthermore, the ELVIS Act creates liability for distributing software or tools primarily used for producing an individual's voice likeness without permission, a move not previously seen in state legislation aimed at protecting the right of publicity. This aspect of the law reflects the complex intersection of technology, copyright law, and personal rights, indicating a shift towards regulating the distribution of software as a means to protect these rights.While the law aims to safeguard individuals' rights against the commercial misuse of their voice and likeness in the age of AI, it also opens up discussions on the balance between protecting those rights and ensuring freedom of expression. The ELVIS Act represents a significant step in addressing the challenges posed by AI to the entertainment industry and personal privacy, setting a precedent for how states might navigate these issues in the future.Elvis Inspires First State AI Protections for Musicians' Voices Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This Day in Legal History: Happy Birthday RBG!On this day in legal history, March 15 marks the birth of an iconic figure in American jurisprudence, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, born in 1933 in Brooklyn, New York. As the second woman ever appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, Ginsburg's legal career was marked by a steadfast commitment to justice, equality, and the rule of law. Before her appointment to the Supreme Court in 1993 by President Bill Clinton, Ginsburg had already made significant contributions to the legal field, notably through her work with the Women's Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union during the 1970s. Her strategic litigation before the Supreme Court as an attorney broke down numerous legal barriers, leading to greater gender equality. Justice Ginsburg's opinions, both majority and dissenting, on the Supreme Court bench were known for their clarity, depth, and unyielding dedication to civil rights. Notably, her dissent in cases like Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. inspired legislation to ensure fair wages for women, highlighting her influence extending beyond the judiciary to the legislative domain. Ginsburg's legacy is not only embedded in her monumental judicial writings but also in her role as a cultural icon, affectionately dubbed "Notorious RBG," symbolizing her enduring impact on generations of lawyers, activists, and ordinary citizens. Her passing in September 2020 was mourned across the nation, reflecting the profound loss of a legal titan who dedicated her life to advancing equality and justice for all Americans.The IRS, in collaboration with the Department of Justice, has initiated a significant enforcement push against crypto tax fraud, marking a new phase with the first standalone criminal charges in this domain. Frank Richard Ahlgren III from Austin, Texas, faced accusations of underreporting or failing to report over $4 million in Bitcoin sales for the years 2017 and 2019, along with significant capital gains derived from these transactions. This case is notable as the first instance where charges were made solely for failing to accurately report cryptocurrency earnings and gains on tax returns, signaling the IRS's increased focus on tax compliance within the cryptocurrency sector.The IRS has been enhancing its efforts in understanding and regulating the cryptocurrency market, issuing guidelines on crypto staking and proposing rules for broker reporting, which would mandate exchanges to report user transactions and identities. Experts see this as a major advancement for the IRS, reflecting years of building technical resources and expertise to tackle crypto tax fraud independently, without relying on other criminal investigations.Tax compliance for cryptocurrency can be complex due to the difficulty in tracking the purchase and sale history of digital assets, complicating the determination of tax obligations. Despite misconceptions about the anonymity of crypto transactions, the IRS is actively disproving this narrative, hiring industry experts to deepen its understanding of the space and strengthen its enforcement capabilities.The Ahlgren case, if it proceeds to trial, will pose a significant challenge in educating the jury about the intricacies of cryptocurrency, setting a precedent for future prosecutions. Legal and tax professionals are closely monitoring this development, anticipating more actions from the IRS as it continues to target underreporting and tax evasion within the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market.IRS's First Crypto Tax Charge Signals Beefed-Up Enforcement PushWalt Disney Co. is employing an unconventional strategy in its fight against activist billionaire investor Nelson Peltz, by reviving the character Professor Ludwig Von Drake, Donald Duck's uncle, to influence its shareholders. In an effort to counter Peltz and nominees from the Trian Group and Blackwell, Disney launched a social media campaign urging investors to support only Disney's board nominees for the upcoming annual meeting on April 3. This marks a significant move by Disney to not just appeal to institutional investors but also to the retail ones, highlighting the importance of every vote through the creation of votedisney.com and engaging storytelling involving classic characters.Peltz, known for his aggressive proxy battles, including a notable one with Procter & Gamble, aims to instigate major changes within Disney, criticizing its lagging profit margins compared to other media giants and calling for restructuring across its business lines. Disney's campaign is a testament to the gravity with which it views Peltz's challenge, employing tactics like political-campaign-style videos to directly address and counter Peltz's and his allies' propositions.The company has gone further by attacking Peltz and other nominated board members, labeling some as "disgruntled former employees," thereby illustrating the personal stakes involved in this boardroom battle. Peltz, in response, has launched his own website and published a manifesto highlighting Disney's operational missteps under CEO Bob Iger, advocating for significant structural reforms, especially in its studio operations.The discourse between Disney and Peltz mirrors political campaigning, with both parties securing endorsements and presenting detailed plans for Disney's future. Disney has rallied support from significant figures, including members of the Disney family and influential business leaders, to bolster its position ahead of the shareholder meeting. The contention underscores the broader issues of governance and strategic direction at Disney, especially concerning succession planning and operational efficiency.Key to understanding the drama at Disney is the universal proxy card rule. The universal proxy card rule allows shareholders in a contested election to vote for a combination of management and dissident nominees using a single proxy card. This rule aims to ensure fairness and transparency in proxy voting by enabling shareholders to cast their votes more accurately according to their preferences, regardless of whether they attend the shareholder meeting in person or vote by proxy. By providing a unified method for proxy voting, the universal proxy card rule enhances shareholder democracy and facilitates more meaningful participation in corporate governance decisions. The rule enables institutional investors to consolidate their voting power across multiple shareholders, facilitating their ability to influence corporate governance decisions and effect significant changes within a company.The ongoing proxy fight, accentuated by the universal proxy card rule, represents a crucial juncture for Disney, reflecting the intricate dynamics of shareholder influence, corporate governance, and the power of narrative in determining the future trajectory of one of the world's most iconic entertainment companies. As the April 3 meeting approaches, both Disney and Peltz remain steadfast, each confident in their vision for the company's future.Disney Revives Donald Duck's Uncle for Showdown With BillionaireJustice Sonia Sotomayor's recent public comments about feeling "tired" and the workload on the Supreme Court have sparked quiet concerns among progressives, reminiscent of the anxiety surrounding Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's refusal to retire during Barack Obama's presidency. Despite Sotomayor nearing her 70th birthday, there's little pressure from progressives for her to step down before the November election, which could see a shift in control to the Republicans. This situation echoes past regrets over Ginsburg's decision to stay on the court, which ultimately led to a conservative shift following her death.The hesitance to call for Sotomayor's retirement stems from the sensitivity around advocating for the departure of the first woman of color on the Supreme Court. There's an ongoing conversation within progressive circles about the strategic timing of Supreme Court retirements, though public discussions are rare. The Supreme Court's role as a pivotal policy-making entity in the country adds to the complexity of suggesting a justice's retirement, as it feels akin to a personal attack on their legacy and contributions.Not everyone supports the idea of Sotomayor stepping down, considering she is not the oldest nor the longest-tenured justice on the bench. Concerns about her health, given her Type 1 diabetes diagnosis, don't seem to impact her ability to serve, yet there's speculation about whether she'll want to continue for several more years.Historical precedents of justices retiring under like-minded presidents, or due to health issues at politically inconvenient times, provide a mixed picture on the predictability of Supreme Court retirements. The possibility of Sotomayor retiring to ensure a successor aligned with her views is debated, especially considering the potential for political shifts in the Senate that could impact the confirmation process.Calls for Sotomayor's retirement are few, partly due to the fear of repeating accusations of bias that emerged during discussions of Ginsburg's tenure. The current political climate, with an upcoming tight presidential election and competitive Senate races, makes the timing of any retirement particularly consequential. Advocates for Sotomayor's retirement emphasize the strategic benefit of ensuring a like-minded successor, acknowledging the uncertainty of future political landscapes and health concerns. However, expecting a justice to retire in an election year is seen as unusual, highlighting the delicate balance between judicial independence and political strategy.Quiet Fears About Sotomayor Echo Ginsburg Retirement ConcernsA federal judge in Florida, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, denied former President Donald Trump's request to dismiss a criminal case against him related to the possession of classified documents after leaving office. Trump's legal team had argued that the charges were vaguely defined, but Judge Cannon, appointed by Trump himself, found the issue warranted consideration but was not grounds for dismissal at this stage. Trump faces a 40-count indictment, accusing him of illegally retaining sensitive government documents post-presidency, marking one of four criminal cases against him as he campaigns for reelection.Judge Cannon also addressed Trump's claim that the documents were "personal" rather than government property, suggesting this argument could be explored during the trial rather than leading to an outright dismissal of the case. Trump has actively filed legal challenges across his multiple criminal cases, arguing, among other points, that a trial should be postponed until after the election. Notably, if reelected, Trump could potentially halt the federal cases against him, though state law cases would remain unaffected.The timeline for the trial remains uncertain, with Special Prosecutor Jack Smith proposing a July start, while Trump has suggested August, emphasizing his preference for a post-election trial. Trump's legal strategies have seen varied success in other cases, including a pause in a federal case about the 2020 election results pending a Supreme Court decision, and complications in a Georgia state election subversion case due to procedural issues. Additionally, Trump's New York state trial concerning hush money payments has faced potential delays.Judge denies Trump motion to dismiss classified-documents case | ReutersThis week's closing theme is by Hector Berlioz.​​The most famous classical piece associated with the Ides of March is likely the "Ides of March" movement from Hector Berlioz's "Symphonie Fantastique." This movement is part of a larger symphony that tells the story of an artist's obsession with a woman. The ominous and foreboding tone of the "Ides of March" movement captures the sense of impending doom often associated with the Ides of March, famously known as the date of Julius Caesar's assassination.Hector Berlioz, born in 1803, was a pioneering French composer, conductor, and music critic of the Romantic era. Renowned for his innovative orchestration and dramatic flair, Berlioz revolutionized symphonic music with his groundbreaking compositions. His masterpieces, such as the "Symphonie Fantastique" and the opera "Les Troyens," showcase his vivid imagination and emotional intensity, earning him a lasting place in the classical music canon. Berlioz's unique style, characterized by its grandeur and expressiveness, continues to inspire and captivate audiences worldwide, cementing his legacy as one of the most visionary composers of the 19th century.Without further ado, the second movement from Hector Berlioz's  “Symphonie Fantastique,” enjoy. Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

On the version of Hot off the Wire posted March 15 at 7:15 a.m. CT: WINCHESTER, Ind. (AP) — Police in Ohio confirmed two deaths resulting from a fierce storm system that unleashed suspected twisters and damaged homes and businesses in parts of Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana. Chief Deputy Joe Kopus of the Logan County Sheriff’s Office in Ohio has confirmed the fatalities and says there likely will be more fatalities discovered following the Thursday storm, noting there was heavy damage in area communities. The Indiana State Police say there are “many significant injuries” after a tornado tore through the community of Winchester and say they are investigating reports of deaths. At a Thursday night news conference the state police said there were “no known fatalities” at the time. Forecasters plan to survey the affected areas Friday to confirm the tornado. LONDON (AP) — System failures at McDonald’s have been reported worldwide, shuttering some restaurants for hours and leading to social media complaints. The fast food chain called the problems Friday a “technology outage” that is being fixed and apologized for the inconvenience. The Chicago-based burger giant said the problems aren't related to a cybersecurity issue. McDonald’s in Japan posted on X, formerly Twitter, that “operations are temporarily out at many of our stores nationwide.” The website Downdetector also reported a spike in problems with the McDonald’s app in the last few hours. Some McDonald’s restaurants are working normally again, with people ordering and getting their food at locations in Bangkok, Milan and London. The Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza is accusing Israeli forces of launching an attack near an aid distribution point in war-wracked northern Gaza, killing 20 people and wounding 155 others. The Israeli military said on Friday that Palestinian gunmen were the ones to open fire and that none of its forces had fired toward the waiting crowd or the convoy in the violence the previous night. Meanwhile, a ship loaded with some 200 tons of aid is nearing the enclave where hundreds of thousands have been driven to the brink of starvation. The aid ship left Cyprus earlier this week towing a barge laden with food. It could be seen off Gaza’s coast on Friday morning. FORT PIERCE, Fla. (AP) — A federal judge has rejected a bid by Donald Trump to throw out out his classified documents criminal case, and appeared skeptical during hours of arguments of a separate effort to scuttle the prosecution ahead of trial. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon issued a two-page order Thursday saying that though the Trump team had raised “various arguments warranting serious consideration,” a dismissal of charges was not merited. Cannon, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, is presiding over one of the four criminal cases against the 2024 presumptive Republican presidential nominee. This case involves records, some highly classified, he took with him from the White House. ABUJA, Nigeria (AP) — A dozen countries across Africa have suffered a major internet outage as multiple undersea telecommunication cables reported failures. Network disruptions caused by cable damage have occurred in Africa in recent years, but “today’s disruption points to something larger (and) this is amongst the most severe,” said Isik Mater, director of research at NetBlocks, a group that documents internet disruptions around the world. Internet firm Cloudflare reported a pattern in the timing of the disruptions that heavily impacted at least 10 countries in West Africa, including Ivory Coast, Liberia, Benin, Ghana, and Burkina Faso. The cause of the failure was not immediately clear. In other headlines: Prosecutors say they're open to delaying start of Donald Trump's March 25 hush-money trial. Top Democrat Chuck Schumer calls for new elections in Israel, saying Benjamin Netanyahu is an obstacle to peace. Former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin says he's putting together investor group to buy TikTok US military chief tours arms plants with GOP lawmakers to show that Ukraine aid boosts jobs at home. James Crumbley, who bought gun used by son to kill 4 students, guilty of manslaughter in Michigan. The Celtics strengthen their grip on their Eastern Conference lead, NCAA men's basketball sees conference tournament week continue, a busy night in the NHL sees twelve games on the schedule, the NFL is investigating the timing of two free agent signings, and the first round of The Players Championship is complete. —The Associated Press About this program Host Terry Lipshetz is managing editor of the national newsroom for Lee Enterprises. Besides producing the daily Hot off the Wire news podcast, Terry conducts periodic interviews for this Behind the Headlines program, co-hosts the Streamed & Screened movies and television program and is the former producer of Across the Sky, a podcast dedicated to weather and climate. Lee Enterprises produces many national, regional and sports podcasts. Learn more here.

Former President Donald Trump's attorneys are arguing in a Florida court Thursday that the federal classified documents case should be thrown out. President Trump arrived at the courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida on March 14 to appear before U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. Former Trump Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said he's assembling a team of investors to make a bid to buy TikTok. This comes after the House of Representatives passed a bill to address the threat posed by the short-video platform. The legislation would give Chinese owner ByteDance six months to divest from the U.S. branch of the company—or face a ban. The former treasury secretary said TikTok is “a great business” and that “it's worth a lot of money.” Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas) has called for a thorough investigation of possible infiltration into the U.S. government after a customs officer at Chicago's O'Hare Airport targeted an American performing arts company with Chinese propaganda. A tour manager from New York-based Shen Yun Performing Arts said the officer described her as an “illegal” based on his presumption of her religious beliefs. ⭕️Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

The previous office holder of the U.S. Presidency, Donald Trump, was seen in a federal courthouse in Florida last Thursday, making his presence felt alongside his legal counsel. They have taken on a mission to bring to an end the ongoing litigation regarding classified documents. At the forefront of this courtroom battle for Trump's lawyers is a bid to convince U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the lawsuits in her Fort Pierce courtroom, the basis of their argument hinges on the nebulous application of the Espionage Act and the Presidential Records Act invoked by special counsel Jack Smith. Meanwhile, the prosecution team from the federal government counters this effort robustly. They insist in a legal document that the ex-president's assertions are fundamentally flawed as they originate from three erroneous assumptions. These errors, as per the prosecution, mirror Trump's belief that his status as a former president exempts him from laws and the concept of accountability, principles which typically apply to all other citizens. Present in the courtroom along with Trump are co-defendants Walt Nauta, working as an aide for him and Carlos De Oliveira, who oversees the property management of Mar-a-Lago. This hearing takes place in the wake of an election interference case against Trump and his co-defendants, where there were some counts dismissed by Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee of Fulton County, Ga. Despite these dismissals, the past president still grapples with 10 pending charges.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On the version of Hot off the Wire posted March 14 at 7:15 a.m. CT: ST. LOUIS (AP) — Massive chunks of hail has pelted parts of Kansas and Missouri and brought traffic to a standstill along Interstate 70. Meteorologists issued thunderstorm warnings and tornado watches Wednesday into Thursday. Alex Sosnowski of AccuWeather said some were calling it “gorilla hail” because of its potential to be so big. Descriptions of hail ranged from the size of golf balls and apples, to softballs and baseballs. There were three unconfirmed reports of tornadoes in Wabaunsee and Shawnee counties. The National Weather Service in Topeka said quarter-size hail and wind gusts up to 60 mph were expected across northern Kansas overnight until 6 a.m. on Thursday. WASHINGTON (AP) — The House has passed a bill that would ban TikTok in the U.S. if its China-based owner doesn’t sell. Lawmakers are concerned the company’s current ownership structure is beholden to the Chinese government and poses a U.S. national security threat. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman accuses Washington of resorting to political tools when U.S. businesses fail to compete. The House bill now goes to the Senate, where its prospects are unclear. TikTok has more than 170 million American users and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd. A TikTok spokesman is criticizing Congress for being too secretive. FORT PIERCE, Fla. (AP) — A federal judge is set to hear arguments on whether to dismiss the classified documents prosecution of Donald Trump. His lawyers say the former president was entitled under the Presidential Records Act to keep the sensitive documents with him when he left the White House and headed to Florida. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team, by contrast, says the files Trump is charged with possessing are presidential records, not personal ones, and that the statute does not apply to classified and top-secret documents like those kept at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. It's unclear when U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon might rule. ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia 2020 election interference case has dismissed some of the charges against ex-President Donald Trump, but others remain. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote Wednesday in an order that six of the charges in the indictment must be quashed, including three against Trump. The order leaves intact many other charges in the indictment. The judge wrote that prosecutors could seek a new indictment on the charges he dismissed. The six charges in question have to do with soliciting elected officials to violate their oaths of office. One of the counts stems from a phone call Trump made to fellow Republican Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Jan. 2, 2021. Trump denies wrongdoing. UNITED NATIONS (AP) — A U.N. report says many countries are bouncing back from the COVID-19 pandemic, but the poorest are not and a significant number are seeing their conditions deteriorate. The U.N. Development Program issued the report Wednesday. Agency head Achim Steiner says that after two decades during which rich and poor countries were coming closer in terms of development, they are now drifting apart. The report says the Human Development Index that UNDP has been producing since 1990 is projected to reach record highs in 2023 after steep declines during the pandemic years of 2020 and 2021. But it says development in half of the world’s poorest countries remains below 2019 pre-pandemic levels. In other headlines: The U.S. has its first presidential rematch since 1956, and other facts about the Biden-Trump sequel. Hunter Biden gun case could go to trial as soon as June — if judge refuses motions to dismiss. Death of nonbinary teen Nex Benedict after school fight is ruled a suicide, medical examiner says. Dollar Tree to close nearly 1,000 stores, posts surprise fourth quarter loss. Judge schedules sentencing for movie armorer in fatal shooting by Alec Baldwin. Free agents continue to move freely around the NFL, the Nuggets win a rematch of the NBA Finals, three more teams earn NCAA men's tournament berths, a busy night out west for the NHL and Dylan Cease ceases to be on the White Sox. Also, the Chiefs restructure Patrick Mahomes' contract for salary cap relief and Louisville fires Payne after going 12-52 in two seasons. —The Associated Press About this program Host Terry Lipshetz is managing editor of the national newsroom for Lee Enterprises. Besides producing the daily Hot off the Wire news podcast, Terry conducts periodic interviews for this Behind the Headlines program, co-hosts the Streamed & Screened movies and television program and is the former producer of Across the Sky, a podcast dedicated to weather and climate. Lee Enterprises produces many national, regional and sports podcasts. Learn more here.

It's been another busy week. Closed-door hearings in the case of the classified documents former President Donald Trump kept at his Mar-a-Lago estate began this week. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon first met with Trump's team and the special counsel's prosecutors on Monday.Meanwhile, America's political turmoil surrounding the 2024 presidential election is hot conversation at the Munich Security Conference. Former President Trump's remarks last week suggesting he wouldn't come to the aid of Europe in the event of a Russian invasion are causing concern among U.S, allies.Israel attacked Rafah Sunday evening, killing many Palestinians who had fled to the city to seeking shelter.And in South America, Guyana has accused Venezuela of violating international law in a dispute over a swath of oil-rich territory.We cover all this and more during the News Roundup. Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

On the version of Hot off the Wire posted Nov. 10 at 3 p.m. CT: LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Grammy nominations have been announced and SZA leads the way with nine nominations. The R&B star earned record, album and song of the year nominations for her album “SOS” and her hit song “Kill Bill.” The Recording Academy announced the nominations Friday. Phoebe Bridgers and Victoria Monét closely followed with seven nominations apiece. That includes six nominations for Bridgers' band boygenius. Taylor Swift, Olivia Rodrigo, Miley Cyrus, Billie Eilish, Brandy Clark, Jon Batiste and Jack Antonoff also have six nods each. The 2024 Grammy Awards will air Feb. 4 live on CBS and Paramount+ from the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles. ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) — Fans have pushed the Fisher-Price Corn Popper into the National Toy Hall of Fame. It joins baseball cards, Cabbage Patch Kids and NERF foam toys in the class of 2023, announced Friday. The Fisher-Price push toy was voted in by fans as part of the Toy Hall of Fame's 25th anniversary celebration. Baseball cards, Cabbage Patch Kids and NERF toys were chosen in the usual way, with input from a panel of national experts. Each year, the Hall of Fame in Rochester, New York, recognizes a group of toys that have inspired creative play and enjoyed long-lasting popularity. WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge in Florida has declined for now to postpone former President Donald Trump's classified documents trial. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon pushed back several pretrial deadlines in a ruling Friday but left the May 2024 trial date intact. Trump faces four criminal cases unfolding in different cities as he seeks to reclaim the White House next year. The Florida felony charges accuse the Republican ex-president of illegally retaining classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate and hiding them from government investigators. Trump denies wrongdoing. COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa (AP) — A man has been arrested in the alleged assault of former U.S. Sen. Martha McSally who says she was molested as she jogged along the Missouri River in Iowa. Council Bluffs police said in a statement that the 25-year-old suspect from Papillion, Nebraska, was spotted by officers in Omaha, Nebraska, at 3:23 a.m. Friday and arrested. Police say the man will be extradited back to Council Bluffs. McSally is a former senator from Arizona. She was in the area for a speaking engagement and was jogging Wednesday morning. She told police a man came up from behind and grabbed and molested her until she fought him off. Police say video surveillance helped lead them to the suspect. MADISON, Wis. (AP) — In Wisconsin, the old fashioned cocktail comes with brandy, not bourbon. Now, state lawmakers have made it somewhat official. A resolution declaring the brandy old fashioned as the official Wisconsin state cocktail cleared the state Assembly on a bipartisan voice vote. It's a resolution, not a bill, so even if it also clears the Senate, the brandy old fashioned won't make it onto the list of other official state symbols that include milk as the official beverage, kringle as the official pastry, and corn as the official grain. For the unfamiliar, the old fashioned cocktail in just about every place other than Wisconsin is traditionally made with a whiskey, like bourbon, sugar and bitters. NEW YORK (AP) — The proportion of U.S. kindergartners exempted from school attendance vaccination requirements has hit its highest level ever. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday released a report detailing the trends. Nationally, 3% of kindergartners got exemptions. Hawaii saw the largest jump, with the statistic nearly doubling from the year before. Idaho was highest overall, with 12%. Experts say more parents are questioning routine childhood vaccinations that they used to automatically accept. It's an effect of the political schism that emerged during the pandemic around COVID-19 vaccines. It also raises the chances of outbreaks of measles, polio and other diseases. MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Department of Justice says Alabama cannot use conspiracy laws to prosecute people and groups who help women leave the state to obtain an abortion. The department filed a statement of interest in consolidated lawsuits brought by an abortion fund and others against Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall. Marshall has suggested his office would “look at” groups who provide abortion assistance. Alabama bans abortion at any stage of pregnancy with no exceptions for rape and incest. The only exemption is if a pregnancy seriously threatens the pregnant patient's health. Marshall's office said he is prepared to defend state law. —The Associated Press About this program Host Terry Lipshetz is a senior producer for Lee Enterprises. Besides producing the daily Hot off the Wire news podcast, Terry conducts periodic interviews for this Behind the Headlines program, co-hosts the Streamed & Screened movies and television program and is the producer of Across the Sky, a podcast dedicated to weather and climate. Lee Enterprises produces many national, regional and sports podcasts. Learn more here.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Friday's Mark Levin Show, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon blew it by setting the Trump documents trial months before the 2024 election. If Trump is convicted, Democrats will use every effort to prevent him from running, and the entire goal of this is to interfere in the election and re-elect President Biden. This is going to tear the country apart like nothing before except the Civil War because nothing like this has ever been done before. There is no reason to hold this trial during the course of the election, and the Department of Justice under Merrick Garland is clearing the way for Biden. Every decision Judge Cannon makes from this point will interfere with the election now that the case has been delayed until May, after the Republican primaries. There are 37 charges against Trump in the first case, and we have no idea how many additional charges will be added in other cases being brought by Democrats, and all they need is a guilty verdict on one charge. The Democrat Party is dragging this country to hell, whether they target Trump or Robert Kennedy Jr. or a minimum wage factory worker because they are the state party and want total control. Later, Mark is joined by former Congressman Rick Renzi to discuss how he was attacked and wiretapped by Jack Smith while he was a Congressman, the abuses of the judicial system Smith has committed, and his connections to James Comey. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon just set the trial date for former President Donald Trump in the classified documents case: May 20, 2024. Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s testimony about government censorship on Thursday was “an epic moment,” according to Jeffrey Tucker, founder and president of the Brownstone Institute. NTD's Chris Beers spoke with Mr. Tucker about securing free speech in America. A prominent New York Democrat is becoming a Republican. He says the Democratic Party has become extreme and doesn't represent his family's Jewish values any more. ⭕️Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

On the version of Hot off the Wire posted July 21 at 3 p.m. CT: Tony Bennett, the eminent stylist and last of the great saloon singers whose devotion to classic American songs and knack for creating new standards such as “I Left My Heart In San Francisco” graced a decadeslong career, has died at 96. A federal judge in Florida has set a trial date for next May for former President Donald Trump in a case charging him with illegally retaining hundreds of classified documents. The May 20, 2024, trial date was set Friday by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. President Joe Biden has chosen Adm. Lisa Franchetti to lead the Navy. If confirmed, she will be the first woman to be a Pentagon service chief and the first female member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. President Joe Biden is praising new commitments by Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and other companies that are leading the development of artificial intelligence technology to meet a set of AI safeguards brokered by his White House as an important step toward managing the “enormous” promise and risks posed by the technology. TV meteorologist Chris Gloninger faced intensifying harassment as he did more reporting on climate change during local newscasts. So on June 21, he announced that he was leaving KCCI — and his 18-year career in broadcast journalism altogether. Gloninger's experience is all too common among meteorologists across the country who are encountering reactions from viewers as they tie climate change to extreme temperatures, blizzards, tornadoes and floods in their local newscasts. —The Associated Press About this program Host Terry Lipshetz is a senior producer for Lee Enterprises. Besides producing the daily Hot off the Wire news podcast, Terry conducts periodic interviews for this Behind the Headlines program, co-hosts the Streamed & Screened movies and television program and is the producer of Across the Sky, a podcast dedicated to weather and climate. Lee Enterprises produces many national, regional and sports podcasts. Learn more here.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this day, July 5th, in legal history, a death sentence for a Florida man convicted of a racially motivated murder was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States. In the case of Barclay v. Florida (1983), the petitioner and a group of men aimed to indiscriminately kill white individuals and incite a racial war. They murdered a white hitchhiker in Florida. The petitioner was found guilty of first-degree murder by a Florida state court jury. According to Florida's death penalty statute, a separate sentencing hearing was conducted before the same jury, which recommended life imprisonment. However, the trial judge, after reviewing a presentence report, imposed the death penalty.In accordance with the Florida statute, the judge provided written findings of fact, including the presence of aggravating circumstances such as the petitioner knowingly creating a significant risk of death to multiple individuals, committing the murder during a kidnapping, attempting to disrupt governmental functions and law enforcement, and displaying extreme cruelty. Additionally, the judge considered the petitioner's criminal record as an aggravating circumstance, ultimately determining that there were enough aggravating circumstances to justify the death sentence. The judge did not find any mitigating circumstances, noting the petitioner's extensive criminal history and the absence of the statutory mitigating circumstance of no significant prior criminal activity.The case was automatically appealed, and the Florida Supreme Court upheld the trial judge's findings, concurring with the rejection of the jury's recommendation of life imprisonment. However, the Florida Supreme Court later overturned its decision and sent the case back to the trial court for the petitioner to have a complete opportunity to challenge the information in the presentence report. After a resentencing hearing, the trial court reconfirmed the death penalty based on nearly identical findings, and the Florida Supreme Court once again affirmed the decision.Thereafter the Supreme Court of the United States took up the case and affirmed the decision once more, holding that the imposition of the death penalty by the trial judge in a situation where the “aggravating circumstances” relied upon were not enumerated in the state's death penalty statute was not in violation of the constitution. In other words, broad discretion was given to the sentencer in imposing capital punishment. Labor negotiations between United Parcel Service (UPS) and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have reached an impasse, increasing the likelihood of a strike by over 300,000 UPS workers. Talks between the two parties collapsed after weeks of negotiations, with the union claiming that UPS presented an "unacceptable offer" that did not address workers' needs. The Teamsters accused UPS of refusing to provide fair compensation to its employees, while UPS argued that the union had stopped negotiating despite a generous pay offer. The current labor contract, which is the largest private-sector union agreement in the US, expires at the end of July. However, labor leaders have stated that they need additional time to educate and convince their members to ratify a new contract. UPS shares fell following the breakdown in talks. The Biden administration is involved in the negotiations and is hopeful that a mutually beneficial agreement can be reached. The discussions have been characterized by tension and tough talk, with both sides failing to agree on issues related to pay and cost-of-living increases. The potential strike comes amid a broader wave of labor unrest in the transportation sector.UPS Labor Talks Stall as Union Balks Over ‘Unacceptable' OfferThe US Department of Energy (DOE) is considering a $1 billion plan to stimulate demand for clean hydrogen and provide initial revenue for large-scale producers, as part of its efforts to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The plan aims to address the challenge of scaling up the hydrogen industry by providing certainty to potential buyers. The DOE will explore demand-side commitments to hydrogen producers through mechanisms such as pay-for-delivery contracts and feasibility funding. The program targets industries that are hard to decarbonize, such as heavy-duty trucking, steel, cement, and chemicals. Public comments will inform the program's setup, and the DOE plans to announce up to $7 billion for regional hydrogen hubs across the country. The hydrogen industry faces feasibility challenges and debates over emissions and infrastructure, and demand-side incentives are crucial to attract private capital and mitigate market failures. The DOE draws inspiration from successful funding programs for technologies like photovoltaics and aims to collaborate with other government agencies, including the Defense Department, to support hydrogen procurement needs.US Weighs $1 Billion Hydrogen Demand Program to Boost IndustryA federal judge in Louisiana has issued a preliminary order that restricts Biden administration officials from contacting social media companies about moderating their content.The order was issued in response to a lawsuit brought by Republican attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, who alleged that U.S. officials violated their right to free speech under the First Amendment by pressuring social media companies to take down posts that officials worried could fuel vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic or conspiracy theories about elections.The order bars government agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services and certain government officials from communicating with social media companies for "the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech" under the First Amendment.The Biden administration has argued that there was no threat of harm because the lawsuit challenged communications that ended more than a year ago. It also said that while it urged social media companies to stop the spread of dangerous misinformation, the companies themselves ultimately made their own decisions.The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals will consider both U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty in Louisiana's finding, laid out in a 155-page opinion, that the government violated the First Amendment, as well as whether the order he issued in response was too broad, or necessary to prevent harm to the plaintiffs.The order is likely to face tough legal challenges on appeal, as experts say there is no precedent to support such a sweeping restriction on government communications.Order limiting Biden officials' social media outreach on shaky legal ground, experts say | ReutersWalt Nauta, a personal aide to former U.S. President Donald Trump, is expected to enter a plea in Miami federal court regarding charges related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents. It is alleged that Nauta helped Trump conceal top-secret documents when he left the White House in 2021. Nauta initially appeared alongside Trump on June 13 but was not arraigned due to the absence of a lawyer licensed to practice in Florida. His arraignment was subsequently postponed a second time for the same reason. Trump, who is currently the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, pleaded not guilty to 37 criminal counts related to unauthorized retention of national security documents and obstruction of justice. Nauta, a former White House valet and current Trump aide, faces six counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, making false statements, and withholding and concealing documents. Prosecutors claim that Nauta hid boxes of documents from Trump's legal team, who were searching for classified material requested by the U.S. Justice Department, and also lied to investigators during an interview. The prosecutors have requested a trial delay until December 11, while the initial trial date was set for August 14. Trump is the first U.S. president, past or present, to face criminal charges in both federal and state courts. In addition to the documents case, he was charged in New York for allegedly falsifying business records to cover up payments to a porn star during his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump has pleaded not guilty in that case as well, denying any wrongdoing and claiming that the investigations are part of a political conspiracy against him. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has scheduled a hearing on July 14 to discuss the handling of classified information in the case, and legal experts anticipate that the complexities surrounding the use of highly classified documents as evidence may lead to delays in Trump's trial.Trump aide Walt Nauta to enter plea in classified documents case | ReutersConservative legal group, America First Legal, has sent a letter to 200 U.S. law schools threatening legal action if they continue to use racial preferences in admissions and hiring. The group, led by former Trump adviser Stephen Miller, argues that such preferences based on race, gender, or national origin are discriminatory and unlawful. The letter, dated June 30, came after the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision on affirmative action, which held that giving preferential treatment to some minority college applicants based on race violated the U.S. Constitution. The conservative group demands that law schools immediately terminate all forms of preferential treatment and announce policies prohibiting such practices before the start of the school year. The letter also claims that racial and gender preferences in law journal participation and article selection are violations of the law. Legal experts believe that the interpretation of the Supreme Court's decision and the use of proxies for racial diversity will likely be resolved through future litigation. America First Legal describes itself as a civil rights organization providing free legal representation to victims of unlawful discrimination. The response from law schools, including Harvard and the University of North Carolina, remains unclear.Conservative legal group threatens to sue law schools over racial preferences | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Today - Glenn has an update on Special Counsel Jack Smith's latest activities as he continues to investigate the crimes of Donald Trump. First - prosecutors in Trump's classified documents case are asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to push the trial date back from August 14th to December 11th. Glenn explains this is because the case involves classified documents and Trump's defense counsel is in the process of getting the necessary security clearances in order to view them. (Though they are dragging their feet!) Then, Jack Smith's 2020 election tampering/ January 6th probe is also blazing ahead. We now know that many witnesses and at least 2 fake electors are testifying before a grand jury in Washington D.C. If the fake electors have been granted limited immunity - does this mean prosecutors are nearing some charging decisions in the case?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Today - Glenn has an update on Special Counsel Jack Smith's latest activities as he continues to investigate the crimes of Donald Trump. First - prosecutors in Trump's classified documents case are asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to push the trial date back from August 14th to December 11th. Glenn explains this is because the case involves classified documents and Trump's defense counsel is in the process of getting the necessary security clearances in order to view them. (Though they are dragging their feet!) Then, Jack Smith's 2020 election tampering/ January 6th probe is also blazing ahead. We now know that many witnesses and at least 2 fake electors are testifying before a grand jury in Washington D.C. If the fake electors have been granted limited immunity - does this mean prosecutors are nearing some charging decisions in the case?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, has pleaded guilty to two federal tax misdemeanors while striking a deal with federal prosecutors regarding a felony gun charge, the Justice Department stated in court filings on June 20. The plea ends a long-running Justice Department investigation. YouTube has censored presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over an interview on the platform between Kennedy and Canadian psychologist, Jordan Peterson. The company said it removed the video for violating its vaccine misinformation policy. Former President Donald Trump is scheduled to go on trial in Florida on August 14, according to an order handed down by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. ⭕️Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

President Joe Biden's son will plead guilty to federal tax offenses but avoid a full prosecution on a separate gun charge in a deal with the Justice Department that likely spares him time behind bars. Hunter Biden will plead guilty to the misdemeanor tax offenses as part of an agreement made public June 20. Former President Donald Trump is scheduled to go on trial in August, according to an order handed down by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. Special counsel John Durham testified before the House Intelligence Committee in a closed-door hearing on his report that found the Justice Department and FBI should not have launched the Trump-Russia investigation in 2016. The missing submersible that took tourists to see the Titanic wreckage has less than 40 hours of air left, according to the U.S. Coast Guard. Authorities are stepping up search and rescue efforts. ⭕️ Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

Joy Reid leads this episode of The ReidOut with the mishandling of classified documents case against Donald Trump, and the judge who is set to oversee the case--U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. Also in this episode, we explore what to expect when President Biden attends a major gun control summit on Friday in Connecticut. Sen. Chris Murphy joins Joy to discuss. Finally, Joy has a big announcement about a blockbuster ReidOut special coming next week. Vice President Kamala Harris joins Joy this Tuesday at 7 pm ET to discuss the abortion landscape post-Roe, what a path to federal protections could look like, and why abortion rights will define the 2024 election, and beyond. Be sure to them for this very special edition of The ReidOut! All this and more in this edition of The ReidOut on MSNBC.

In a groundbreaking development, former President Donald Trump has been indicted on several federal charges related to his handling of classified documents. Assigned to oversee the initial stages of the case is U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a judge appointed by Trump himself. This news has sparked intense interest and raised concerns about potential biases and delays in the legal process. The indictment against Trump comes in the wake of the FBI's seizure of over 100 documents with classified markings from Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in August 2022. Despite vehemently denying any wrongdoing, Trump's fate now rests in the hands of the justice system. However, questions arise about the impartiality of Judge Cannon, given her direct appointment by Trump and the potential for a more favorable judicial environment in Florida. Court documents and insider sources have confirmed that Judge Aileen Cannon will be presiding over the initial proceedings of the case. This development has prompted discussions about the potential impact of a Trump-appointed judge on the fairness and integrity of the trial. Skepticism regarding the objectivity of judges in cases involving influential political figures or individuals with connections has become prevalent in recent times. The concerns surrounding Judge Cannon extend beyond her current assignment. In August 2022, her decision to restrict the FBI's use of the seized classified documents during the investigation garnered significant attention from legal experts and scholars. The subsequent delay in the investigation and legal proceedings prompted an 11th Circuit Court of Appeals panel to overturn Judge Cannon's order, citing her overstepping of jurisdiction in the probe. The incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between judicial authority and law enforcement imperatives, particularly in high-profile cases. Furthermore, Judge Cannon is currently presiding over the Castro v. Trump lawsuit, where John Anthony Castro, a GOP 2024 Presidential Candidate, is suing Trump for alleged violations of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Castro asserts that Trump's actions supporting the January 6th Insurrectionists render him ineligible to hold the presidency. However, concerns have arisen regarding Judge Cannon's handling of this case as well. In an interview with Renaldo McKenzie on The Neoliberal Round Podcast and as part of The Neoliberal Corporation Moral Magazine's Castro V Trump Series, Castro accused Judge Cannon of deliberate delays and filing difficulties. In response, Castro has recently filed a Writ of Mandamus, urging the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss Judge Cannon and recuse her from the case, citing partiality, bias, and intentional trial delays. Complicating matters further is Trump's strategic relocation to Florida, where he has appointed surrogates, including judges, in key positions. This strategic move raises suspicions of potential favoritism and an advantageous legal environment for Trump. Critics argue that such maneuvers undermine accountability and obstruct justice without repercussions. As former President Donald Trump faces potential legal hurdles, the impartiality and fairness of Judge Aileen Cannon in overseeing the case are under intense scrutiny. The delays and perceived biases in the ongoing Castro v. Trump lawsuit add to concerns about the integrity of the legal process. Stay updated on the latest developments by following The Neoliberal Round Podcast with Renaldo McKenzie, and for comprehensive coverage, read the forthcoming transcripts in The Neoliberal Corporation Moral Magazine. Renaldo McKenzie, Author of Neoliberalism, President of The Neoliberal Corporation, and Editor-In-Chief at The Neoliberal Corporation Moral Magazine, will provide in-depth analysis and arguments on the case. For more information, visit The Neoliberal Corporation's website: https://theneoliberal.com. Subscribe for free and Donate at: The Neoliberal Round Support Contact us --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theneoliberal/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theneoliberal/support

On Thursday afternoon, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in the amusingly captioned case Trump v. United States of America. The three-judge panel vacated District Judge Aileen Cannon's order appointing a special master to review the material seized at Mar-a-Lago by the Justice Department, and it ruled in scathing language that she had no authority to entertain the case at all To go over it all, Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes sat down before a live audience on Twitter Spaces with Lawfare executive editor Natalie Orpett and Lawfare senior editor Scott R. Anderson. They went through the decision page-by-page and talked about whether things would speed up now that Judge Cannon's ruling is out of the way and what kind of message the 11th Circuit is sending to a new judge who seemed to be willfully intervening on the part of the ex-president.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On Nov. 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in the case regarding the storage of classified documents at former president Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence and the subsequent seizure of those documents by the Justice Department. Justice Department prosecutors argued the merits of their appeal of District Judge Aileen Cannon's appointment of a special master to review the seized documents. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance break down the latest developments in the legal battles stemming from the FBI's Mar-a-Lago search. Will the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals expedite DOJ's appeal of the special master appointment, as DOJ has requested? To what extent might District Judge Aileen Cannon's latest order further delay the review process? In the full episode, Preet and Joyce discuss: – The Washington Post report that earlier this year, Trump lawyer Alex Cannon refused to sign a declaration that all presidential documents were returned to the government; and – The trial for Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and his co-defendants for their involvement in the attack on the Capitol. Stay informed. For analysis of the most important legal and political issues of our time, try the membership for one month for $1.00: www.cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast, and other exclusive benefits. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE Studios and Vox Media Podcast Network.  REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:  Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, motion to expedite appeal, 9/30/22 Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida, order accepting in part and rejecting in part amended case management plan, 9/29/22 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ah... Fall, crisp breezes, colorful leaves, stopgap government funding bills, averting government shutdowns. Everyone except Dianne Feinstein expects them at this time of year. Once he outgrew his early Saturday morning TV role, David Waldman never imagined that he'd ever need to address flutes again, but now it's come to this. In just a few years, Lizzo has won Grammys, Emmys, and hit No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100. But then she decided to be Black, female, and a little too happy with all that for conservatives, appalled at seeing her flaunt her flautist lips all over our revered founding father James Madison's old flute. This flute has been held in hallowed regard by the right for about 5 minutes now and by tradition should only be playing Aqualung. A Tennessee lawmaker pointed out the growing crisis of idiot Tennessee lawmakers implying that any school anywhere allows their students to poop in litterboxes. Sculptures of Ron Johnson can be found in various litterboxes across the nation, but if you have to see a life-size scatue, that POS can only be found in Milwaukee.  U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, biding her time as she waits for an opening on the Supreme Court, threw team Trump a few more bones and some of special master U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie's experience and dignity. Tucker Carlson suggests that the US blew up the Nord Stream pipeline, and Russia loves him for it. Maybe they'll honor Tuck with a plaque beneath their defenestration window to read on the way down.   Donald Trump's paid speeches make him millions and bankrupt his vendors. Donald Trump makes millions and bankrupts his vendors. 

On September 5th, 2022, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointed judge, granted Trump's request for a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, thus delaying the DOJ's investigation into the alleged actions of the former president and blocking their review of seized documents. In response, on September 8th, the DOJ appealed Judge Cannon's order, citing the delay of review could be a threat to our national security. On September 15th, Judge Cannon declined to lift any part of the order, and a special master was appointed to review documents from the Mar-a-Lago search. So what is a special master? Is a special master appropriate in this situation? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Stanford Law professor David Alan Sklansky, faculty co-director at Stanford Criminal Justice Center, as they discuss this ruling, its potential impact, and the role of a special master. Mentioned in This Episode: Judge Cannon's Ruling A Pattern of Violence: How the Law Classifies Crimes and What It Means for Justice

On September 5th, 2022, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointed judge, granted Trump's request for a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, thus delaying the DOJ's investigation into the alleged actions of the former president and blocking their review of seized documents. In response, on September 8th, the DOJ appealed Judge Cannon's order, citing the delay of review could be a threat to our national security. On September 15th, Judge Cannon declined to lift any part of the order, and a special master was appointed to review documents from the Mar-a-Lago search. So what is a special master? Is a special master appropriate in this situation? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Stanford Law professor David Alan Sklansky, faculty co-director at Stanford Criminal Justice Center, as they discuss this ruling, its potential impact, and the role of a special master. Mentioned in This Episode: Judge Cannon's Ruling A Pattern of Violence: How the Law Classifies Crimes and What It Means for Justice

A federal judge has appointed a veteran New York jurist to serve as an independent arbiter in the criminal investigation into the presence of classified documents at Donald Trump's Florida home. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has also refused to permit the Justice Department to resume its use of the highly sensitive records seized in an FBI search last month. Cannon on Thursday empowered the newly named special master, Raymond Dearie, to review all the documents taken in the Aug. 8 search of Mar-a-Lago and set a November deadline for his work. Republican governors are escalating their practice of sending migrants without advance warning to Democratic strongholds, including a wealthy summer enclave in Massachusetts and the Washington, D.C., home of Vice President Kamala Harris. The White House is calling the practice a “cruel, premeditated political stunt.” Ukrainian authorities are expected to begin recovering bodies from a mass burial site in a forest recaptured from Russian forces. It's a delicate task that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said would help show the world “what the Russian occupation has led to.” It was discovered close to Izium after a rapid counteroffensive by Ukrainian forces retook the northeastern city and much of the Kharkiv region. People are being told not to join the line to view Queen Elizabeth II's coffin after a surge in numbers. British officials said Friday morning that the organized line was at capacity and no one will be allowed to join it for at least six hours. Medical centers around the country say fires, flooding, heat waves and other extreme weather are increasingly jeopardizing medical services, damaging health care facilities and forcing patients to flee their hospital beds. That's according to findings released Thursday in a report from the House Ways and Means Committee. In a memoir Anne Heche worked on last year, the actor shared candid thoughts on her 3-year relationship with Ellen DeGeneres in the late 1990s, when they were among Hollywood's first openly gay couples. Democrats are punting a vote to protect same-sex and interracial marriages until after the November midterm elections, pulling back just days after Majority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed to put the Senate on the record on the issue “in the coming weeks.” In sports, the Chiefs were three points better than the Chargers, the Twins and White Sox inched closer to the Guardians, the Rays made MLB history, the Mets ended their skid, a tennis great retired and the WNBA Finals will stretch into the weekend. Rail companies and their workers reached a tentative agreement to avert a nationwide strike that could have shut down the nation's freight trains and devastated the economy less than two months before the midterm elections. President Joe Biden announced the deal Thursday. Biden plans to meet at the White House on Friday with the families of WNBA star Brittney Griner and Michigan corporate security executive Paul Whelan, both of whom remain jailed in Russia. The meetings are to be the first in-person encounter between Biden and the families and come amid sustained but so far unsuccessful efforts by the administration to secure the two Americans' release. A boil-water notice has been lifted in Mississippi's capital city after nearly seven weeks. Gov. Tate Reeves and Jackson officials made the announcement Thursday. A Virginia man who stormed the U.S. Capitol while wearing an antisemitic “Camp Auschwitz” sweatshirt over a Nazi-themed shirt has been sentenced to 75 days of imprisonment. Photographs of Robert Keith Packer wearing the sweatshirt went viral after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Thousands of mourners are waiting for up to nine hours in line to file past the coffin of Queen Elizabeth II as she lies in state at Westminster Hall. The queue to pay respects to the late monarch stretched for 4.4 miles past Tower Bridge on Thursday. Russian President Vladimir Putin thanked his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping for his “balanced” approach to the Ukrainian crisis and blasted Washington's “ugly” policies at a meeting that followed a major setback for Moscow in the war. Roger Federer has announced that he is retiring from professional tennis at the age of 41 after winning 20 Grand Slam titles. Federer has not competed since Wimbledon in July 2021. Two minutes of silence will be observed Monday across the United Kingdom at the end of Queen Elizabeth II's state funeral at Westminster Abbey. That's to give the British public a chance to pay their respects to the late monarch. Buckingham Palace released details Thursday of the state funeral and a ceremony at St. George's Chapel in Windsor ahead of her private interment later Monday. Average long-term U.S. mortgage rates climbed over 6% this week for the first time since the housing crash of 2008, threatening to sideline even more homebuyers from a rapidly cooling housing market. Mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported Thursday that the 30-year rate rose to 6.02% from 5.89% last week. President Joe Biden's popularity has improved substantially from his lowest point this summer, but concerns about his handling of the economy persist. That's according to a poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Support for Biden recovered from a low of 36% in July to 45%, driven in large part by a rebound in support from Democrats just two months before the November midterm elections. Newly revealed text messages show how deeply a Mississippi governor was involved in the state paying more than $1 million in welfare money to Brett Favre to help pay for one of the retired NFL quarterback's pet projects. Instead of the money going to help low-income families in one of the nation's poorest states, as intended, it was funneled through a nonprofit group to Favre and was spent on a new volleyball facility at a university both men attended. —The Associated PressSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The former special master for the Sept. 11 Victim Compensation Fund and Deepwater Horizon disaster made clear in an interview that he saw no need for a similar process to take place with respect to the highly classified documents found in former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago property."I think that this is judicial overreach, especially in a case involving highly sensitive classified documents," prominent attorney Kenneth Feinberg, who has served as a special master in high-profile litigation and government appointments, says on the podcast. "The court should not be intervening in such a executive branch function, traditionally and historically."A little more than a week ago, Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon did just that, finding judicial oversight justified by the "undeniably unprecedented" nature of an investigation of a former president. The government has appealed the order to the 11th Circuit, warning that the disclosure of the documents with "TOP SECRET" markings alone would cause "exceptionally grave damage" to U.S. national security. Prosecutors did not seek a stay of the ruling as to the more than 11,000 government documents without classification markings that the FBI found inside Mar-a-Lago.With a special master review imminent in at least some form, Feinberg answers questions about the process going ahead — starting with, what is a "special master," anyway? Though he disagrees with the judge's ruling and Trump's legal team, he also articulates what he believes their strongest arguments are.SUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Court JunkieSidebarThey Walk Among AmericaCoptales and CocktailsThe Disturbing TruthSpeaking FreelyLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Thursday, September 8, 2022 Subscribe: Get the Daily Update in your inbox for free 1/ The Justice Department appealed a federal judge's decision to grant a special master to review documents seized from Trump's Mar-a-Lago home. Earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon ordered the appointment of an independent attorne... Visit WTF Just Happened Today? for more news and headlines, brought to you by Matt Kiser. The WTFJHT Podcast is narrated and produced by Joe Amditis.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday granted former President Trump's requested to appoint a special master to review documents seized during the raid at Mar-a-Lago.  With her decision, Cannon, who is a Trump appointee, has also waded into the messy politics of the whole situation as many quickly criticized the ruling.  Zoe Tillman, senior reporter at Bloomberg News, joins us for what to know about the special master and its impact.   Next, we'll tell you about all the backlash to quiet quitting.  It started as a movement among office workers to just do the bare minimum and draw more work/life boundaries, but bosses and work coaches say there really isn't a reason to coast on the job.  Detractors say it can cause more laziness and even hurt the performance of other employees.   Kathryn Dill, reporter at the WSJ, joins us for why people are hating on quiet quitting.   Finally, you may have seen them strolling on a sidewalk near you, but delivery robots may not be ready for prime time just yet.  A pilot program in 4 cities looking at the impact of these delivery bots determined that in a lot of cases it was the failure of local infrastructure that proved difficult for them to succeed.  They worked in more controlled environments but might not be ready for more critical tasks such as delivering medication.  Joann Muller, transportation correspondent at Axios, joins us for more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Wednesday The South Carolina Senate will debate a near-total abortion ban that right now, does not include exceptions for pregnancies caused by rape or incest.  Abortion exceptions for rape and incest up to 12 weeks of pregnancy were removed by a 7-3 vote from a Senate committee Tuesday. Democrats abstained from voting in an effort to prevent the bill from passing through the legislature.  “This is an awful bill. I just can't say that enough,” said Senate Minority Leader Brad Hutto, (D-Orangeburg). “What we've witnessed here is the Republican majority's attempt to impose an extreme total ban on abortion on women in South Carolina." READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/politics/senate-committee-removes-rape-incest-exceptions-abortion-bill-south-carolina/101-87e8e3df-740c-4a1e-a7b3-5bbdf7491872 In a legal victory for former President Donald Trump, a federal judge on Monday granted his request for a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and also temporarily halted the Justice Department's own use of the records for investigative purposes. The decision by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon authorizes an outside legal expert to review the records taken during the Aug. 8 search and to weed out from the rest of the investigation any that might be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege or executive privilege. Some of those records may ultimately be returned to Trump, but the judge put off a ruling on that question. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/nation-world/trump-special-master/507-a4b919b1-b31e-4fb3-9ec2-0330f17e891e Plus, turns out Charlotte is one of the most polite cities in the US, at least according to people who live here. A new survey asked residents around the country to rank their city's politeness. Charlotte tied with Dallas, Texas at number 15 for more polite.  Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT! 

On Wednesday The South Carolina Senate will debate a near-total abortion ban that right now, does not include exceptions for pregnancies caused by rape or incest. Abortion exceptions for rape and incest up to 12 weeks of pregnancy were removed by a 7-3 vote from a Senate committee Tuesday.Democrats abstained from voting in an effort to prevent the bill from passing through the legislature. “This is an awful bill. I just can't say that enough,” said Senate Minority Leader Brad Hutto, (D-Orangeburg). “What we've witnessed here is the Republican majority's attempt to impose an extreme total ban on abortion on women in South Carolina."READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/politics/senate-committee-removes-rape-incest-exceptions-abortion-bill-south-carolina/101-87e8e3df-740c-4a1e-a7b3-5bbdf7491872In a legal victory for former President Donald Trump, a federal judge on Monday granted his request for a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and also temporarily halted the Justice Department's own use of the records for investigative purposes.The decision by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon authorizes an outside legal expert to review the records taken during the Aug. 8 search and to weed out from the rest of the investigation any that might be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege or executive privilege. Some of those records may ultimately be returned to Trump, but the judge put off a ruling on that question.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/nation-world/trump-special-master/507-a4b919b1-b31e-4fb3-9ec2-0330f17e891ePlus, turns out Charlotte is one of the most polite cities in the US, at least according to people who live here. A new survey asked residents around the country to rank their city's politeness. Charlotte tied with Dallas, Texas at number 15 for more polite. Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT! 

A federal judge agreed to appoint a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Florida estate, a move that is likely to delay the Justice Department's criminal investigation. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in West Palm Beach, Florida, granted Trump's request for a special master, an independent third party who is sometimes assigned in sensitive cases to review materials that could be covered by attorney-client privilege. Cannon said the person will be tasked with reviewing documents that are not just covered by attorney-client privilege, but any records possibly covered by executive privilege as well. The decision to allow a special master to review documents that could be covered by executive privilege, a legal doctrine that can shield some White House records from disclosure, is uncharted legal territory. Cannon also ordered the Justice Department to stop reviewing the records as part of its criminal investigation, a move that will likely at least temporarily hinder its ability to continue investigating.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A federal judge agreed to appoint a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Florida estate, a move that is likely to delay the Justice Department's criminal investigation. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in West Palm Beach, Florida, granted Trump's request for a special master, an independent third party who is sometimes assigned in sensitive cases to review materials that could be covered by attorney-client privilege. Cannon said the person will be tasked with reviewing documents that are not just covered by attorney-client privilege, but any records possibly covered by executive privilege as well. The decision to allow a special master to review documents that could be covered by executive privilege, a legal doctrine that can shield some White House records from disclosure, is uncharted legal territory. Cannon also ordered the Justice Department to stop reviewing the records as part of its criminal investigation, a move that will likely at least temporarily hinder its ability to continue investigating.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Charlotte welcomes a new city council on Tuesday, September 6 during a swearing-in ceremony. The new council includes mostly familiar faces with a few new names.  "The priority should be 'let's get back to basics.' We've had a lot of self-inflicted wounds, we really need to go back and think about regular infrastructure, potholes, the job of the city," Tariq Bokhari, district six councilman, said.In recent years, council tackled a number of controversial issues including the Unified Development Ordinance, the Charlotte 2040 comprehensive plan, pandemic response, and transit. "This last council was able to put a bow on a lot of big things before this term ended... it's got to be back to the basics of housing, community safety, transportation," Larken Egleston, outgoing district one councilman, said.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/politics/flashpoint/charlotte-city-council-swears-in-new-members-on-tuesday-september-6-flashpoint/275-96188c90-5a54-4785-8bd8-765ecdd0275fIn a legal victory for former President Donald Trump, a federal judge on Monday granted his request for a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and also temporarily halted the Justice Department's own use of the records for investigative purposes.The decision by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon authorizes an outside legal expert to review the records taken during the Aug. 8 search and to weed out from the rest of the investigation any that might be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege or executive privilege. Some of those records may ultimately be returned to Trump, but the judge put off a ruling on that question.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/nation-world/trump-special-master/507-a4b919b1-b31e-4fb3-9ec2-0330f17e891ePlus, have you ever had a boss treat you so badly that you were forced to quit your job? Welcome to "quiet firing."Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT! 

Charlotte welcomes a new city council on Tuesday, September 6 during a swearing-in ceremony. The new council includes mostly familiar faces with a few new names.   "The priority should be 'let's get back to basics.' We've had a lot of self-inflicted wounds, we really need to go back and think about regular infrastructure, potholes, the job of the city," Tariq Bokhari, district six councilman, said. In recent years, council tackled a number of controversial issues including the Unified Development Ordinance, the Charlotte 2040 comprehensive plan, pandemic response, and transit.  "This last council was able to put a bow on a lot of big things before this term ended... it's got to be back to the basics of housing, community safety, transportation," Larken Egleston, outgoing district one councilman, said. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/politics/flashpoint/charlotte-city-council-swears-in-new-members-on-tuesday-september-6-flashpoint/275-96188c90-5a54-4785-8bd8-765ecdd0275f In a legal victory for former President Donald Trump, a federal judge on Monday granted his request for a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and also temporarily halted the Justice Department's own use of the records for investigative purposes. The decision by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon authorizes an outside legal expert to review the records taken during the Aug. 8 search and to weed out from the rest of the investigation any that might be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege or executive privilege. Some of those records may ultimately be returned to Trump, but the judge put off a ruling on that question. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/nation-world/trump-special-master/507-a4b919b1-b31e-4fb3-9ec2-0330f17e891e Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT!