Podcasts about Grilli

La giornata internazionale della donna si avvicina. Durante la mattinata di giovedì 6 marzo, nel programma Degiornalist – condotto da Fabiana Paolini e Claudio Chiari – abbiamo ospitato la direttrice del settimanale "Grazia"  Silvia Grilli, che ci ha parlato dell'intervista che ha fatto a Elena Cecchettin e, più in generale, di maschilismo: «Elena, dopo la morte di sua sorella Giulia uccisa dall'ex fidanzato, è stata il simbolo di una nuova presa di coscienza da parte delle persone. Questa ragazza è stata accusata con violenza di voler apparire. Una donna che dice la sua opinione è sempre una brutta persona per la maggioranza. È da questi piccoli episodi che nasce la violenza, i femminicidi sono la punta dell'iceberg di una violenza diffusa in ogni livello della società».MASCHILISMO E INDIPENDENZA - «Le donne afgane non possono uscire di casa, parlare, cantare e vengono eretti dei muri davanti alle loro porte. Ma il grande orrore è che le bambine non possono andare a scuola, però fare qualcosa per loro è difficile perché a nessuno frega niente. Ma il maschilismo non è solo una prerogativa degli uomini, è anche nella testa delle donne. L'amore vero, oltre all'affetto e al volere bene, è rispettare la libertà dell'altro. Le donne maltrattate vedono la loro libertà completamente cancellata a piccoli passi, vietando loro di uscire e di vedere le amiche,  di usare il telefonino, di avere un conto in banca».

On-location interview with a singer, songwriter, guitar player who just released a new album last month, on January 10th. At the end of October, he released a video for one of the songs that would end up on the album and it already has well over 41 thousand views on YouTube. He has an amazing story of getting out to southern California to perform at LAST year's NAMM Show and in addition to performing at this year's, he has shows coming up in late February on back-to-back nights in Georgia. He was on this show five years ago this month and has added two daughters to the mix since then, in addition to – on the music side – ventured into research and development with Vallhalla Amplification.

This week Brian and Jason chart about Brian's re-discovery of Dan Baird, formerly of The Georgia Satellites. Next the guys welcome their guest, blues-rock guitarist Brian Grilli. Brian chats with the boys about his connections to Blackberry Smoke, The Steepwater Band, and Dan Baird, a current side project he's working on out in Joshua Tree, his start in music, his new record, "Great Big Sky," and so much more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lo mangeresti? Ne parliamo con Benedetta Tieri e Stefania D'Alonzo!

Mary Jo e Paolo Bracalenti cercano di sostenere le due tesi, voi da che parte state?

Robert (Bob) Wilson is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Georgia Tech. We talk about his tutorial paper (w/ Anne Collins) on computational modelling, and some of his recent work on detecting phishing.BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith.Support the show: https://geni.us/bjks-patreonTimestamps0:00:00: Bob's strange path through computational cognitive neuroscience0:07:37: Phishing: a computational model with real-life applications0:25:46: Start discussing Bob's paper 10 simple rules for computational modeling of behavioral data0:32:15: Rule 0: Why even do computational modelling?0:46:24: Rules 1 & 2: Design a good experiment & Design a good model1:02:51: Rule 3: Simulate!1:05:48: Rules 4 & 5: Parameter estimation and recovery1:18:28: Rule 6: Model recovery1:25:55: Rules 7 & 8: Collect data and validate the model1:33:15: Rule 9: Latent variable analysis1:36:24: Rule 10: Report your results1:37:46: Computational modelling and the open science movement1:40:17: A book or paper more people should read1:43:35: Something Bob wishes he'd learnt sooner1:47:18: Advice for PhD students/postdocsPodcast linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-podTwitter: https://geni.us/bjks-pod-twtRobert's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/wilson-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/wilson-scholarTwitter: https://geni.us/wilson-twtBen's linksWebsite: https://geni.us/bjks-webGoogle Scholar: https://geni.us/bjks-scholarTwitter: https://geni.us/bjks-twtReferencesEpisodes w/ Paul Smaldino: https://geni.us/bjks-smaldinohttps://geni.us/bjks-smaldino_2Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, & Anderson (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition.Feng, Wang, Zarnescu & Wilson (2021). The dynamics of explore–exploit decisions reveal a signal-to-noise mechanism for random exploration. Scientific Reports.Grilli, ... & Wilson (2021). Is this phishing? Older age is associated with greater difficulty discriminating between safe and malicious emails. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B.Hakim, Ebner, ... & Wilson (2021). The Phishing Email Suspicion Test (PEST) a lab-based task for evaluating the cognitive mechanisms of phishing detection. Behavior research methods.Harootonian, Ekstrom & Wilson (2022). Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction. PLoS Computational Biology.Hopfield (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. PNAS.MacKay (2003). Information theory, inference and learning algorithms.Miller, Eugene & Pribram (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behaviour.Sweis, Abram, Schmidt, Seeland, MacDonald III, Thomas, & Redish (2018). Sensitivity to “sunk costs” in mice, rats, and humans. Science.Walasek & Stewart (2021). You cannot accurately estimate an individual's loss aversion using an accept–reject task. Decision.Wilson & Collins (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. Elife.

Lumière sur les Jongleurs de Notre Dame, troupe de théâtre amateur à Dole qui s'apprête à lever le rideau sur une pièce truculente : « Le don d'Adèle », une pièce en 4 actes, mise en scène par Pascal Vaubourgeix. A découvrir au théâtre municipal de Dole, jeudi 24, vendredi 25 & samedi 26 octobre à 20h30 et dimanche 27 octobre à 15h. On découvre le pitch avec Catherine Grillière, vice-présidente, secrétaire et comédienne au sein de la troupe des Jongleurs de Notre Dame.

In this episode Amy Grilli shares the transformative journey that led her to create the Five Hour Club, a job board aimed at providing flexible work opportunities for parents. Amy recounts her early career in education and her struggles with identity when considering the traditional path of stay-at-home motherhood. Her viral LinkedIn post, which expressed a collective frustration with work-life inflexibility, struck a chord with literally millions of people (14millino and counting!) and prompted the creation of a platform offering five-hour workdays to cater to parents.   Amy discusses that with me, amidst the impact of societal judgment on women's roles, the emotional weight of invisible labour, and the broader implications of workplace inflexibility.   Insightful and inspiring, this episode delves into the challenges and triumphs of advocating for a work-life balance that honours both professional ambitions and family commitments.   Find the Five Hour Club online here.  Find the club on Instagram here.    Don't forget to join the conversation with me on Instagram here.    --------------   Thank you so much to Tapd for supporting this episode.   Tapd is an EFT Practice run Denise Hanrahan.   More commonly known as Tapping, EFT stands for Emotional Freedom Technique and is an amazing way to lower everyones favourite stress hormone - cortisol. It is also brilliant for dealing with anxiety, grief, panic attacks, even creative blocks. It could be the somatic practice you need to get yourself ‘unstuck'. For more info, check out tapd.co, or DM Denise on insta here.     Listeners will also benefit from a 20% discount on any one to one session. Use code ‘business' when booking.    -------------   EPISODE HIGHLIGHTS   03:13 Amy's Early Work Experiences 07:04 Transition to Teaching and Education 11:18 Struggles and Realizations 22:51 The Birth of the Five Hour Club 25:43 The LinkedIn Post That Changed Everything 26:35 Going Viral: The Unexpected Impact 27:26 Building Momentum: From Post to Community 31:54 Creating the Five Hour Workday 35:08 Redefining the Workplace for Parents 45:39 Future Plans and Community Building 50:00 Final Thoughts and Reflections

The Pirates have guys who have been there and done that on playoff teams this season like Martin Perez, Aroldis Chapman, and others. Grilli liked that Bednar will get the chance to keep going and it matters to a closer. 

Hour 4 with Dorin Dickerson and Adam Crowley: Former Pirates closer Jason Grilli joined the show on National Grilled Cheese Day! IF David Bednar could put up some 0's instead of having to make mechanical issues, it could help. Jason texted Bednar to express his support. It might take a little luck with how the ball bounces too. A lot of guys can be deemed a 'closer,' but Bednar should be the guy and have a cohesive group with Chapman and Holderman. The Pirates have guys who have been there and done that on playoff teams this season like Martin Perez, Aroldis Chapman, and others. Grilli liked that Bednar will get the chance to keep going and it matters to a closer. Pittsburgh native and Ohio State golfer Neal Shipley is -2 at The Masters. Sidney Crosby should win the Hart Trophy. Social Media's Biggest Loser. 

Zu Gast ist Grillmaster Flash, der sein erstes Heavy Metal Album "FLASH METAL" vorstellt.Du möchtest deinen Podcast auch kostenlos hosten und damit Geld verdienen? Dann schaue auf www.kostenlos-hosten.de und informiere dich. Dort erhältst du alle Informationen zu unseren kostenlosen Podcast-Hosting-Angeboten. kostenlos-hosten.de ist ein Produkt der Podcastbude. Gern unterstützen wir dich bei deiner Podcast-Produktion.

Nella puntata di oggi raccontiamo la storia di Nutrinsect, la prima azienda italiana autorizzata a produrre farina di grillo per l'alimentazione umana. Parliamo poi dell'atteso decreto del ministero dell'Ambiente con le istruzioni e gli incentivi per le comunità energetiche e dell'arrivo della Carta Cultura e della Carta del Merito per i giovani.

Join Reed Luhtanen, Executive Director of the U.S. Faster Payments Council as he goes off the Rails with Lou Grilli and Jorge Jimenez from PSCU and Juniper, a PSCU company. Lou, Jorge, and Reed talk about big doings in the credit union space, fraud, and the hidden talents of these two guests.

Il Morning Show Mercoledi 15 novembre 2023

Mato Valtonen on Sleepy Sleepersistä ja Leningrad Cowboysistä tuttu muusikko, yrittäjä ja elokuvanäyttelijä. Hänellä on ollut näppinsä pelissä Helsingin ravintolaskenessä ja ruokatarinoita taskut pullollaan. Mato kuvaa ruokamatkaansa kivikaudelta alkaneena seikkailuna, joka kulkee eväsmaksamakkaraleivistä tex-mexiin, risottoon ja sushiboksiin. Muistelemme Cantina Westin tequilaa tarjoilevia slammer girlejä ja juttelemme Maton ensimmäisestä grillistä, jolla oli nimi, kummi ja jopa kummilusikka.Kirre selvittää myös, mitä syötiin silloin, kun 1993 Leningrad Cowboys ja Puna-armeijan kuoro esiintyivät legendaarisessa Senaatintorin konsertissa. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.06.28.546918v1?rss=1 Authors: Zheng, L., Gao, Z., Doner, S., Oyao, A., Forloines, M., Grilli, M., Barnes, C. A., Ekstrom, A. D. Abstract: Older adults show declines in spatial memory, although the extent of these alterations is not uniform across the healthy older population. Here, we investigate the stability of neural representations for the same and different spatial environments in a sample of younger and older adults using high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the medial temporal lobe. Older adults showed, on average, less distinct neural patterns between spatial environments and more variable neural patterns within a single environment. We also found a positive association between spatial distance discrimination and the distinctiveness of neural patterns between environments. Our analyses suggested that one source for this association was the extent of informational connectivity to CA1 from other subfields, which was dependent on age, while another source was the fidelity of signals within CA1 itself, which was independent of age. Together, our findings suggest both age-dependent and independent neural contributions to spatial memory performance. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC

After a dramatic Sunday win, Blake Murphy goes over how the late comeback came together for the Jays. Sportsnet 590 The FAN's own Ben Shulman jumps on to discuss the weekend that was from Toronto, before getting you set for the team's upcoming road trip which he and Blake will be on the radio call for. After that, an all-time fan favourite Jay and new podcast host of Mound Visit, Jason Grilli checks in to catch up, tell some stories and give some thoughts on this year's Blue Jays team (30:11). For the second hour, Sportsnet's own Arden Zwelling joins Blake in-studio to give his firsthand take on Sunday's eight inning rally and Cavan Biggio's heroics, before taking a look around at some key components and names that have stepped up for the team (50:30). To close the show, Blake welcomes Blue Jays great Jesse Barfield, who this weekend will be inducted to the Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame! He lets us know what the honour means to him, reminisces on his days in Toronto, and shares how he's helping some young players today and what he's seen out of this year's Jays squad (01:24:53). The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Sports & Media or any affiliates.

Quanti di voi hanno assaggiato già il "cibo del momento" - di cui tutti discutono, spesso con delle risibili affermazioni - ossia i grilli? Quanti di voi hanno dei preconcetti, e quanti invece li assaggerebbero? Scopriamo il mondo degli insetti edibili con José Cianni, CEO di Nutrinsect, una delle prime realtà italiane a commerciare grilli edibili con un sistema di allevamento incredibilmente innovativo - passato attraverso molte evoluzioni dovute ai problemi scoperti e poi risolti. Chi ha paura della chitina?

Cari amici e amiche di Fuori dal chiostro, nella puntata di oggi abbiamo deciso di prendervi per la gola e vi proponiamo un viaggio alla scoperta delle nuove frontiere alimentari: dalla farina di grillo alla fantomatica carne “sintetica”, ecco tutto quello che c'è da sapere

Da gennaio 2023 la farina di Grillo può essere commercializzata in tutti i paesi inclusa l'Italia. In molti si chiedono se possano esserci dei rischi in questa novità, e i social non hanno mancato di riempirsi delle solite fake. Proviamo a fare un po' di chiarezza. Anzitutto sgombriamo il campo a chi teme che la farina possa essere occultata o inserita “di nascosto” negli alimenti, già da prima vi erano norme specifiche che lo vietavano, tanto più che la farina di grillo contiene chitina, che è un prodotto che tecnicamente può determinare una reazione allergica. Quindi non soltanto va indicato in etichetta ma, proprio in virtù di questo aspetto, anche con caratteri maggiormente visibili. Non è neppure vero che si tratti di un prodotto in qualche modo “sporco o contaminato”, dal momento che gli insetti non sono raccolti in natura, ma allevati secondo un preciso disciplinare, che regolamenta tutte le fasi, inclusa quella di raccolta, abbattimento previo digiuno, bollitura e tostatura. Quanto alla chitina occorre anzitutto dire che non è vero che non viene digerita, l'uomo ha un gene che codifica per le chitinasi, enzimi che servono proprio a gestire la chitina, e l'assenza di chitinasi è % minore al deficit di lattasi (l'enzima per la digestione del lattosio). In ogni caso, anche posto che non venga digerita, significa che entra a far parte della grande famiglia delle fibre, con implicazioni quindi sul corredo batterico intestinale. Da qui quindi le strade sono due, se viene digerita si ottiene un prodotto che molti conoscono, perché usato anche come integratore: il chitosano noto per il suo impiego all'interno di integratori alimentari commercializzati con lo scopo di ridurre l'assorbimento dei grassi e del colesterolo, utilizzato anche per l'obesità e la malattia di Crohn. Se resta come chitina non digerita, viene elaborata a livello batterico, con ripercussioni sul sistema immunitario, che è la prima linea di difesa contro simili eventi. Non da ultimo La farina di grillo fornisce proteine di elevato valore biologico, ferro biodisponibile, vitamine del gruppo B e omega 3.

In questo quindicesimo episodio del mio nuovo podcast, parlerò di un argomento discusso in questi giorni e dell'ipotetica introduzione di cibi sostituitivi come la carne sintetica e l'utilizzo della farina di grilli.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Design Director at Emaar Properties, with extensive experience in both Design and Real Estate Development industries. Involved in the development of large-scale masterplans like Dubai Creek Harbour, Emaar Beachfront, Dubai Hills Estate and several ongoing projects across MENA region and Europe. Sought-after speaker in the industry, sharing insights on sustainable design, mixed-use development, vertical cities at renowned events and universities. Holds a Master's Degree in Architecture and Urban Planning from the University of Ferrara and has worked with international firms in The Netherlands, Italy and the UAE.   In this episode, you'll discover: Creating beauty and harmony in contemporary developments Time-tested project leadership principles for long-term success How culture and architecture in Dubai are formed Insights to large-scale masterplanning that creates impact How functionality is key to developments And so much more. Resources: emaar.com S,M,L,XL - O.M.A - Rem Koolhaas Show notes If you enjoyed this episode, and you've learnt something or it inspired you in some way, I'd love to hear about it and know your biggest takeaway. Take a screenshot of you listening on your device, and post it to your Instagram Stories, and tag me, @elinormoshe_ or Elinor Moshe on LinkedIn.   Join the home of young guns here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/weareyoungguns   Get a copy of my book: https://amzn.to/31ILAdv

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

La puntata si apre con un argomento un po' particolare, la depressione post parto. Se fosse un argomento difficile da affrontare o se non fosse per voi il momento giusto per sentirne parlare, sentitevi liberi di saltare tutta la prima parte!La gravidanza, il parto e il prendersi cura di un neonate sono esperienze bellissime ma anche innegabilmente difficili. Includono grandi cambiamenti a livello fisico ma anche mentale; gli ormoni e i neurotrasmettitori cambiano in fretta e spesso si creano grandi sbalzi che vanno ad influenzare l'umore e lo stato emotivo delle mamme. Uno dei cambiamenti più improvvisi avviene proprio nel periodo post parto quando gli alti livelli di ormoni presenti durante la gravidanza di colpo non vengono più prodotti. Questo calo improvviso può causare tristezza, irritabilità e sensazione di inadeguatezza, certo non audiuvate dalla stanchezza e dal fatto di doversi prendere cura all'improvviso di un nuovo essere umano.La situazione può peggiorare oppure può insorgere di colpo come depressione post parto anche più avanti nel corso del primo anno di vita del bambino. Capita, non c'è nessuna colpa e non vuol dire che si è cattivi genitori, ma è importante riconoscere i segni e chiedere una mano quando e se serve.E' importante anche che le persone vicino a noi siano informate per aiutarci a riconoscere l'insorgenza di un problema e per supportarci meglio.Qui trovate alcune risorse riguardo la depressione post parto: link1, link2Nell'intervista esterna Giuliana intervista Lorenzo Baglioni, cantante e autore di numerose canzoni didattiche, alcune delle quali raccolte nel disco “Bella, Prof!” che potete ascoltare quiRingraziamo Valentina P. per averci dato lo spunto per l'intervista!Rientrati in studio con una barza brutta brutta brutta a cura di Marco, si parla del futuro della stazione spaziale, che sembra sarà operativa almeno fino al 2030, dando speranza per il continuo di alcune collaborazioni internazionali anche nel clima politico purtroppo poco disteso che stiamo vivendo in questo periodo.Inoltre Marco si improvvisa nutrizionista e ci racconta di ricerche fatte sulla cannella, la spezia di Dune, e riprende la polemica sulla farina di grillo e insetti vari che in questo momento spopola ma di cui noi avevamo parlato in un intervista esterna con la Prof. Cristina Truzzi nella puntata 370.

Nell'Unione europea possono essere commercializzati alcuni alimenti a base di insetti. La novità è stata accolta da critiche e ironia, ma anche da un po' di disinformazione.Scriveteci all'indirizzo segnalazioni@facta.news o segnalateci le notizie che volete verificare al numero 3421829843.Seguiteci sul nostro sito Facta.news, sui nostri profili Facebook, Instagram, Twitter e TelegramCondotto da Camilla VagnozziEpisodio scritto da Camilla VagnozziProdotto da Jessica Mariana MasucciLINK UTILIChitina ed ecdisterone degli insetti non sono dannosi, Facta.newsInsetti nel reparto freschi Conad, Facta.newsKinder «fetta a blatte», Facta.newsIl colore rosso del Campari c'entra con un insetto? Facta.newsLink audio presenti nell'episodio: notiziario1; notiziario2; notiziario3; notiziario 4CREDIT BRANI“Dynamic world” di StockStudio “Come on” di Lesfm“Documentary” di Coma-media

Forse oggi Germania e Stati Uniti daranno l'ok per inviare carri armati all'Ucraina, sono uscite le nomination degli oscar (le trovate qui) e da ieri la farina di grilli è acquistabile nei supermercati d'Europa.  Justin Bieber ha venduto tutte le sue canzoni, Rick e Morty dovranno cambiare voce e c'è un motivo se la casella di posta elettronica non vi va. Questo e altro nella puntata di oggi, buona giornata! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/vitamine-factanza/message

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.01.24.525313v1?rss=1 Authors: Lupori, L., Totaro, V., Cornuti, S., Ciampi, L., Carrara, F., Grilli, E., Viglione, A., Tozzi, F., Putignano, E., Mazziotti, R., Amato, G., Gennaro, C., Tognini, P., Pizzorusso, T. Abstract: Perineuronal nets (PNNs) surround specific neurons in the brain and are involved in various forms of plasticity and clinical conditions. However, our understanding of the PNN role in these phenomena is limited by the lack of highly quantitative maps of PNN distribution and association with specific cell types. Here, we present the first comprehensive atlas of PNN distribution (in Allen Brain Atlas coordinates) and colocalization with parvalbumin (PV) cells for over 600 regions of the adult mouse brain. Data analysis showed that PV expression is a good predictor of PNN aggregation. In the cortex, PNNs are dramatically enriched in layer 4 of all primary sensory areas in correlation with thalamocortical input density, and their distribution mirrors intracortical connectivity patterns. Gene expression analysis identified many PNN correlated genes. Strikingly, PNN anticorrelated transcripts were enriched in synaptic plasticity genes, generalizing PNN role as circuit stability factors. Overall, this atlas offers novel resources for understanding the organizational principles of the brain extracellular matrix. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC

#notizie #podcast #politica

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.01.23.525279v1?rss=1 Authors: Hill, P. F., McAvan, A. S., Garren, J. D., Grilli, M. D., Barnes, C. A., Ekstrom, A. D. Abstract: Spatial navigation deficits in older adults are well documented. These findings are based on experimental paradigms that require using a joystick or keyboard to navigate a virtual desktop environment. In the present study, cognitively normal young and older adults navigated in each of two virtual reality (VR) conditions: a desktop VR condition which required using a mouse and keyboard to navigate and an immersive and ambulatory VR condition which permitted unrestricted locomotion. Consistent with past studies, older adults navigated to target locations less precisely than did younger individuals in the desktop condition. These age differences were significantly attenuated when tested in the immersive environment. Additional analyses indicated that older adults showed a preference for route-based search strategies compared to young adults, regardless of condition. These findings suggest that certain aspects of navigation performance in older adults are improved in paradigms that offer a fuller range of enriched and naturalistic cues. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC

Altre considerazioni nutrizionali e non solo sugli insetti come cibo

Michele Grilli e Paolo Baldieri ospiti di Cristiano Cesarini

NeverAsh is a newer cigar brand that was launched by Tom Grilli and his Uncle Steve Rotondi in 2020. Tom from NeverAsh Cigars joins us as he discusses how he quit his full time IT job and decided to go all in on the cigar business! Also the origination of the catch phrase "NeverAsh" and how it was used amongst family and friends and turned into a cigar business!   Become a member on our website! Exclusive discounts & Giveaways! https://www.burndownpodcast.com/

What you'll learn in this podcast episode “Thirty years of innovation and influence” is the subtitle of the recent report issued by the United States Sentencing Commission. But what does that really mean in the context of the organizational sentencing guidelines? In this episode of LRN's Principled Podcast, Eric Morehead, LRN Director of Advisory Services Solutions, is joined by one of the report's authors: Kathleen Grilli, the General Counsel for the US Sentencing Commission. Listen in as the two discuss how the commission impacts business leaders and the creation of compliance programs.    Read LRN's takeaways from the report here.  Principled Podcast Show Notes coming soon   Featured guest: Kathleen Grilli Kathleen Cooper Grilli is the General Counsel for the United States Sentencing Commission, having been appointed to the position on October 7, 2013. Ms. Grilli has been on the staff of the Commission since 2003, serving as an assistant general counsel from 2003-2007 and deputy general counsel from 2007-2013. As the General Counsel, Ms. Grill provides legal advice to the Commissioners on sentencing issues and other matters relating to the operation of the Commission. Ms. Grilli is the agency's Ethics Officer and has conducted training on white collar crime and the organizational guidelines at numerous training events.Prior to working for the Sentencing Commission, Ms. Grilli was with the Office of Staff Counsel for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Before relocating to Virginia, Ms. Grilli was a partner in a small firm in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, handling civil and criminal litigation. Her previous work experience includes serving as an Assistant Federal Public Defender in the Southern District of Florida and as an associate at Akerman, Senterfitt and Edison, handling commercial litigation. Ms. Grilli is a member of the Bars of Florida and Virginia. She received a Bachelor of Arts in International Relations, with honors, from Florida International University. She graduated cum laude from the University of Miami School of Law.   Featured Host: Eric Morehead Eric Morehead is a member of LRN's Advisory Services team and has over 20 years' experience working with organizations seeking to address compliance issues and build effective compliance and ethics programs. Eric conducts program assessments and examines specific compliance risks, he drafts compliance policies and codes of conduct, works with organizations to build and improve their compliance processes and tools, and provides live training for Boards of Directors, executives, managers and employees.    Eric ran his own consultancy for six years where he advised clients on compliance program enhancements and assisted in creating effective compliance solutions.  Eric was formally the Head of Advisory Services for NYSE Governance Services, a leading compliance training organization, where he was responsible for all aspects of NYSE Governance Services' compliance consulting arm. Prior to joining NYSE, Eric was an Assistant General Counsel of the United States Sentencing Commission in Washington, DC. Eric served as the chair of the policy team that amended the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines in 2010. Eric also spent nearly a decade as a litigation attorney in Houston, Texas where he focused on white-collar and regulatory cases and represented clients at trial and before various agencies including SEC, OSHA and CFTC.     Principled Podcast Transcript Intro: Welcome to the Principled Podcast, brought to you by LRN. The Principled Podcast brings together the collective wisdom on ethics, business and compliance, transformative stories of leadership, and inspiring workplace culture. Listen in to discover valuable strategies from our community of business leaders and workplace change makers.   Eric Morehead: 30 Years of Innovation and Influence is the subtitle of the recent report issued by the United States Sentencing Commission, but what does that really mean in the context of the organizational sentencing guidelines?   Hello, and welcome to another episode of LRN's Principled Podcast. I'm your host today, Eric Morehead, Director of Advisory Service Solutions at LRN. Today, Kathleen Grilli, the General Counsel of the United States Sentencing Commission is joining us. She's one of the authors of this recent report, and we're going to be talking about how the commission impacts business leaders and the creation of compliance programs across the world. Kathleen is a real expert in this space and is a guest of ours last season where we talked about the seven hallmarks of an effective ethics and compliance program enshrined in the US Sentencing Commission's federal sentencing guidelines. Kathleen Grilli, thanks for joining us again on the Principled Podcast.   Kathleen Grilli: Well, thanks for inviting me, Eric. I appreciate it.   Eric Morehead: The commission just released this new report, The Organizational Sentencing Guidelines: 30 Years of Innovation and Influence. Even after more than 30 years, there are still, I think, at least from my perspective, many people who, when they start their career in compliance, are confused a little bit about why the Sentencing Commission is involved in corporate compliance. Can you talk just a little bit about how the US Sentencing Commission came to assume the role it has regarding compliance standards?   Kathleen Grilli: Sure. You say that people in compliance are confused about it, but the truth is, even in the criminal justice arena where the commission operates... Our guidelines are used in federal courts for sentencing organizations and offenders. Even in that arena, there's not really widespread knowledge about Chapter 8 and the hallmarks for an effective compliance and ethics program. That's because there aren't a lot of organizational cases sentenced every year.   But the reason the commission got into the business of corporate compliance has to do with its statutory mission. The commission was created in 1984 through a bipartisan piece of legislation called the Sentencing Reform Act, and that act did a couple of things as it related to sentencing of organizations. It provided that organizations could be sentenced to a term of probation, sentenced by way of a fine, and it required that at least one of those be imposed. This was something new.   It also subjected organizations to orders of criminal forfeiture, meaning the proceeds of the criminal activity could be taken from them, order of notice to victims, and orders of restitution. That act also created the commission, which is a bipartisan agency and tasked the commission with developing guidelines for use in criminal cases for sentencing. It told us what the purposes of sentencing are, which is just punishment, deterrence, protection of the public, and rehabilitation of the offender. The commission had to decide what to do for sentencing of an organization. Obviously, you cannot put an organization in prison. Unlike individual offenders where sentencing ranges in terms of incarceration are something of the norm, you had to figure out what to do to sentence organizations.   With an organization, as we know, the bottom line is they're in business to make money. In developing the organizational guidelines, the commission came up with its notion that it should use fines to incentivize self-policing. It would punish organizations who were not self-policing or not trying to prevent a crime or commit the offense with certain aggravating factors more severely than those who were trying to prevent and detect crime. That's how we got into the business of corporate compliance.   Eric Morehead: Yeah. And it is interesting that the original writ was from the statute that you examine this. Can you talk a little bit about how the commission got specifically to those hallmarks, those programmatic pieces that we talked about a little bit on our last podcast a while ago? What was the process for the commission to get to those standards, those specific compliance pieces of the puzzle, if you will?   Kathleen Grilli: The commission started its work in 1986 on organizational guidelines with a public hearing at which it received testimony from a variety of witnesses across various different wakes of the world: academics, people in business, government agencies, and the like. Over about a five-year period, because as I said, the Commission started its business in 1986 and didn't actually promulgate the organizational guidelines until 1991. During that period of time, there were numerous public hearings attended by a wide range of witnesses from different areas of the law, academics, government agencies, business owners, representatives of just different industries, and the like. The Commission had these hearings, they heard testimony, the Commission went back and developed drafts with proposals for how organizations would be sentenced. They published those drafts. The process of publishing is really a solicitation for public comment, so they got public comment on the drafts. This went on for a good period of time.   In the meantime, the Commission was doing research. We had academics writing proposals and giving us ideas on how to implement the purposes of sentencing, which again, as I said, were just punishment, deterrents, protection of the public, and rehabilitation. Eventually, it came back to how does an organization get in trouble to begin with? An organization doesn't act alone. We have this theory in the law called vicarious liability where an organization is held responsible for the acts of its agents, meaning its employees. If the employees are the bad actors, everyone finally came to the conclusion that the best way to incentivize or prevent corporate crime was for the organization itself to self-police and to direct its employees and talk about what is and is not appropriate. That's how we ended up with compliance standards.   At the time that they started all this work, compliance and ethics was not widely accepted in the industry. There was a little bit of compliance in the context of antitrust and then there was, in the defense industry, there was an initiative relating to that. Those ideas got floated before the commission and it generated a lot of interest. That's how they started developing the standards.   Again, the standards were included in proposed guidelines that were published and they got public comment and not long before the actual vote where they adopted these guidelines. Even folks who were skeptical about whether this was going to work or not thought that the Commission had gotten the hallmarks of a compliance program right. They thought that they made sense and that they gave sufficient guidance to folks on what would and would not work.   Eric Morehead: That's a really important point too, and I often will say this when I'm talking to people and I talk about my background. Full disclosure, I'm a former employee of the US Sentencing Commission, so I have a strong belief in the mission of the organization. But oftentimes, I will say, "Well, they were first," and part of being first is you've tried different things and maybe you don't know exactly what's going to work and what is going to be successful. But I think over time, and this report really homes in on that, this notion that the direction that the Commission took from '86 to '91 really has paid off a lot of benefits.             One of the conclusions, one of the key conclusions from the report is that perhaps one of the biggest wins for the organization over the years is the widespread of adoption of the guidance and, in particular, the standards for what makes an effective compliance program.   I have a two-parter here. Do you think the Commission recognized in '91 how important that might be? And does the Commission today understand the overall importance of the organizational guidelines, and in particular, 8B2.1, those compliance hallmarks? Did they understand it then and what's the understanding of the Commission now of the relative importance of these?   Kathleen Grilli: Well, let me just back up a minute and just say that the commissioners who promulgated the organizational guidelines in 1991 no longer serve on the Commission. Commissioners have term limits. It's a different group then. It was a different group in 2004 that made the changes that brought ethics into the standards for compliance and ethics programs. As we were talking about before we started this podcast, we have a brand new group of seven new commissioners recently nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. You have different folks working on it. I can say that in the process of doing the research for this publication and others that I've worked on in this area, the Commission I don't think ever expected what we see today 30 years later. This widespread influence not only in terms of its use in the criminal justice arena, but how it has impacted other agencies.   And we'll talk about that and the global reach. The Commission itself said, "This is an experiment." They had hopes that it would lead to better actors in the corporate world, but those were hopes and there was a lot of skepticism from the business community when this process was ongoing about whether this was going to work or not. I think we're always blown away when we realize the impact of it, and I say that from a personal point of view, too. Because when I came to the Commission and I've been on the staff for some time, I was not aware of Chapter 8. I had never represented in court an organization, but only individuals.   And the first time I went to a compliance and ethics program where I saw and understood how well received and well regarded and what an impact we had had outside of the criminal justice arena, it sort of blew my mind that I know Judge Murphy and her Commission in 2004 or just before 2004, when they adopted the changes, they learned about it too when they came on board and it sort of blew them away. And I don't know with my current new bosses how well informed they are about this. This is really one of the reasons why, before they came on board, the staff and the then Commission, the one member, Judge Brier wanted to put this report out, memorializing the 30-year anniversary of the organizational guidelines. We're very excited about it, I have to say.   Eric Morehead: No, it is an amazingly effective rubric that the Commission put together and that the Commission is taken a measured approach from my opinion, both in 2004. And then I had an up-close look in 2010 when I was on staff through that process. I think that its impact is pretty incredible 30 years later, looking back.   One of the other things that's incredible... And I talk about new things when you come to the Commission. I had never really paid much attention to sentencing data until I joined the Commission in 2007. And the majority of the actual pages of this report have a lot of really interesting data about the organizations that have been sentenced over 30 years. Some key takeaways include trends that many of us, for those of us who are sentencing nerds, have seen over the years about the impact on small organizations, for example, versus larger organizations, making up the vast majority of defendants in that data set.   To me, a lot of looking for what makes... Because compliance professionals that are listening to this podcast and that are not necessarily interested in sentencing per se, but interested in the sentencing guidelines because of compliance, they're looking for what makes a successful compliance program from sentencing data. To me, a lot of it is what you don't see. It's sort of like looking for... I liken it to looking for a black hole when you're an astronomer. You can kind of tell the telltale characteristics of a black hole existing because of how it affects everything else. And we don't really see organizations that have successful programs in this data. There were just 12 organizations out of those 5,000 or so in 30 years.   Kathleen Grilli: 11.   Eric Morehead: 11. See? I even increased the number. It's just 11 organization out of 5,000 or so, 4,900 and some change, that have ever been deemed to have a successful program. What are some other striking things that you and the team noticed looking over this data and these trends for 30 years?   Kathleen Grilli: Let me just first say what this data is and what it is not so that listeners can understand why they may not find what they're looking for as to what makes a successful compliance program from the data. This data is for organizations, whether it be a corporation, a closely held corporation, partnership, whatever, but organizations that a federal prosecutor has decided to charge and gets convicted of a federal crime. It doesn't include organizations that the prosecutors decide, "Oh, we're going to enter into a deferred prosecution agreement or a non-prosecution agreement." It doesn't include organizations where a regulatory agency has seen that they violated some of the regulations, but they've decided not to proceed against them criminally but to pursue civil adjudications. I mean, in some ways, this data is about the folks that prosecutors decided were the worst of the worst organizations. You don't see what makes a successful compliance program in this data, but I like to say what we do see is that some of the things that the Department of Justice says to you about what they're looking for in deciding whether to prosecute an organization or not might find support in this data. We concluded that the lack of an effective compliance and ethics program might be a contributing factor to criminal prosecutions against organizations. And what specifically led us to that?   Well, in the 30 years that we've been collecting data, overwhelming majority of the organizational offenders in our data set didn't have any program at all, much less an effective program. 89.6%, as you said, as you mentioned and asked me the question, there were only 11 sentences in fiscal year 1992 that got a culpability score reduction for having an effective compliance and ethics program. And I want to stop on those 11 because we went back. Everybody's always interested in what happens with those organizations or why was their program effective? And we were not able to suss a lot of information from the documentation to sort of tell people what it was. There wasn't a lot of descriptive information in the documents we received that would answer that question, but there's only 11 of them. And most of those 11 were very small organizations. It means they didn't have to have a very complex type of program.             More than half, 58.3%, of organizational offenders sentenced under the fine guidelines got a culpability score increase for involvement in or tolerance of criminal activity by upper management would suggest to you. If the management or the substantial authority personnel are in on it, they may well end up sentenced before a federal court. I think that's an important point, too. And very few of these organizations, we'd only saw 1.5% overall that did the three things that get you the maximum reduction off your culpability score, which is self-report, cooperate, and accept responsibility. There were very few organizations, even though there were many that pleaded guilty and accepted responsibility, that actually self-reported. That's important because you hear the Department of Justice talk about why that matters. And this data sort of offers support for the fact that it does.             And then the other thing we saw is that courts are now ordering organizations to implement effective programs in about 20%, one-fifth of the cases that come before them when they impose probation. This was the kind of data that we thought would help fuel the discussion or the debate on the importance of having an effective compliance and ethics program. The other thing you should note about our data, I think it's important too, is that a good percentage of the organizations that have been sentenced over the last 30 years are smaller organizations. It's not large publicly-traded Fortune 500 companies. It's smaller, less number of employees. I think that matters too.   Eric Morehead: That's a trend that I think we've noted in the data, because the size of organizations, the number of employees has been a data point that the commission has released over the years on an annual basis. And by the way, as it's worth mentioning for people who are interested, there'll be a link in the show notes here for this particular report we're talking about. But the Commission puts out data all the time. And at least on an annual basis, there's the Sentencing Commission's Sourcebook on sentencing, which has discussion on organizational cases and includes some of this data. You don't have to wait 30 years to see the trends again. You can keep up with it at the Sentencing Commission website.   Yeah. The small organizations... I think a big surprise to people who have first heard about this because we see the headlines all the time about the Enrons and, I'm going to date myself here, World Comps and Volkswagen and some of the other organizations. Some of those aren't actually even criminal sentences, as you point out. Those are deferred prosecution agreements or civil settlements of some sort, but those are the companies that make the headlines. It's the little guys, small and medium-sized organizations, that take these big hits more frequently than the larger organizations. That, I think, is surprising to people who aren't familiar with the data, but that's a consistent trend throughout the entirety of the enforcement, at least throughout the 30 years that the Commission's been keeping track.   Kathleen Grilli: Yeah. It may change now, given what the Department of Justice said last week.   Eric Morehead: Yeah. You never know. Yeah never know. We'll have to pay attention and then look at the Sourcebook next year and see what the differences are. The other impact beyond our friends at the Department of Justice and the courts throughout the United States is the impact that the Commission and the organizational sentencing guidelines and these standards have had on other enforcement agencies besides the criminal enforcement and also internationally, which I think is very interesting.   Can you talk a little bit... And that's documented in chapter three of this report. The first chapter is talking a little bit about the history. The second chapter is the data that we were just discussing. And then chapter three talks about how the USSC has encouraged other enforcement agencies and regulators to focus on good governance and compliance. Can you discuss a little bit about what the team found when you researched that?   Kathleen Grilli: Yeah. I think that using the word that the USSC has encouraged suggests that there's some sort of active work going on by the Commission. Let me just say that I don't think that is a fair statement. The Commission did its work and let its work speak for itself, and it has sort of spread throughout regulatory agencies and/or the globe just because it makes sense, I think. Anyway, that's my personal opinion. But I made reference to the Department of Justice, and so I'll start with a Department of Justice if I could.   The Attorney General, where it's his designee is an ex-officio member of the Commission, a non-voting member. Obviously, the Attorney General Department of Justice were actively involved in the development of the chapter eight itself and then the subsequent amendments in 2004 and 2010. But you see the impact of the guidelines in their evaluation of corporate compliance programs and all of the information that they release and discuss on how they focus on compliance in deciding how to prosecute an organization.   Just last week, the Deputy Attorney General, Lisa Monaco, talked about changes that they're going to make. There was sort of an oblique reference to our data, which is that there's been a drop in corporate prosecutions that we see in the data. I think there were less than a hundred last year, and they talked about sort of reversing that trend and looking at that, that the department thinks this is important. And they've placed a lot of importance recently on compliance programs because she said companies need to actively review their compliance program to ensure that they adequately monitor for and remediate misconduct or it's going to cost them down the line.   Kenneth Polite, who is the... I think it's Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division. He's a former chief compliance officer and they've made a lot of emphasis in the department on active review of programs and true independence for the chief compliance officer. That's the Department of Justice who obviously are actively involved in using the guidelines in federal courthouses, but then you have other regulatory agencies.   I'm going to run through them real quick and just say the SEC, HHS, EPA, FERC, which is Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the FAR all have requirements built into them about compliance programs. And most of them say that they're looking to the guidance on the guidelines. Some of them adopted them full scale, some of them may have modified them a little bit. And all of that came after chapter eight in 1991. All of those agencies look to the guidelines.             And then we see that if you look internationally at what's happening around the world in terms of anti-corruption, anti-bribery, and all the like, that elements of the hallmarks for an effective compliance and ethics program found in the guidelines are making their way into legislation, into programs, into initiatives that foreign governments are releasing. And I can't even keep track of it, truthfully, but it seems to be coming up more and more and more.             When the Commission promulgating the guidelines in 1991, they described them as an experiment. We wanted in this publication to sort of show, did the experiment bear fruit? And I think all of that suggests that it did. These changes and everything that goes back to those original seven steps laid out in the guidelines and elevated in 2004 to give them a little more prominence. It really is very, very exciting. I feel bad. I sound sort of like I'm patting myself on the back, and so I want to make it really clear to the listeners. I was not on this staff in 1991. I wasn't working on this. I did not have anything to do with the 2004 amendments. I came into it after the fact, but it's just really exciting to see it and to see the impact and how well regarded the Commission's work is.   Eric Morehead: No, I think that's right. I think the report really sums up what I think a lot of us have felt. Again, I'm probably biased, but a lot of us have felt this way for a while, that the standards, really, have set the bar and provided kind of a North Star for compliance programs for that whole generation, that whole 30 years. And it's made a difference in millions of people's daily lives in their working lives, because it affects how their company operates for the good or for the bad. And that really makes all the difference to us. I think you guys can successfully pat yourselves on the back a little bit.   Well, last thing, again, knowing that we're talking to a lot of compliance officers who hopefully have, if they're new, have a little bit more appreciation as to why the US Sentencing Commission is involved in their lives, are there other takeaways from the research and work that the team put into this report that you think are particular importance for compliance professionals or things they should be aware of? Kathleen Grilli: Well, one of the things that I hear when I intend conferences and one of the things that I think folks [inaudible 00:26:26] is the fact that there's not enough investment in compliance. The bottom line in business is money and making money, and you can't necessarily provide metrics that show how your work is going to add to the bottom line. Then it's hard to make the case. Now, I know these days, in recent years, folks have come up with ways to measure how compliance and ethics does contribute to the bottom line, and I really believe it does. But this data can offer you the picture of what happens if you don't.   Eric Morehead: Yeah.   Kathleen Grilli: Because since 1992, courts have imposed nearly $33 billion in fines on organizational offenders. The average fine was over $9 million. Although the median was a little lower, it was only $100,000. But for a small mom and pop organization, a hundred grand is a lot of money. And the other thing is that courts will sentence organizations to probation. Over two thirds of the organizational offenders in the last 30 years have been placed on probation with an average term of 39 months, where you're going to have to be reporting to a probation officer and complying with all these requirements. And that's time consuming and costly, too, when you think about it. There's a little bit there that can answer the mail in terms of why am I going to invest in compliance and ethics.   Eric Morehead: I'm a big believer in making the positive business case, but you also need to make the "everybody's going to go to jail" case too.   Kathleen Grilli: Well, especially in light of the recent guidance that the Department of Justice, I mean, where they're going to be looking at individuals and they're going to be requiring organizations to give up all individuals who might be involved, I think that's something that folks should keep in mind as well. It's important because it's not just going to be the company, it's going to be the employees too.   Eric Morehead: Yeah. And again, that's important data. That's in chapter two of this report, that over 50% of the time over the period, you've got at least one living, breathing human being who's also faced charges consistent with the charges that the organizations faced. It includes actual human beings in this process, not just the organization.   Kathleen Grilli: I think we're only going to see an increase if the department's guidance holds true that those numbers may go up.   Eric Morehead: Yeah. We'll have to check. We'll check in next year after the Sourcebook comes out and see if the trend has moved. Kathleen Grilli, it's been a tremendous honor again to have you on our podcast and really appreciate you taking the time.   Kathleen Grilli: Oh, it's an honor for me to be here. Thank you so much for inviting me.   Eric Morehead: No problem. My name is Eric Morehead and I want to thank all of you for tuning in once again to the Principled Podcast by LRN. Outro: We hope you enjoyed this episode. The Principled Podcast is brought to you by LRN. At LRN, our mission is to inspire principled performance in global organizations by helping them foster winning ethical cultures rooted in sustainable values. Please visit us lrn.com To learn more. And if you enjoyed this episode, subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Google Podcasts, or wherever you listen, and don't forget to leave us a review.  

By Adam Turteltaub The Organizational Sentencing Guidelines have turned thirty, and what began as an experiment is now an established framework for compliance programs in the US and around the globe. To commemorate the milestone, the United States Sentencing Commission has published The Organizational Sentencing Guidelines: Thirty Years of Innovation and Influence, which takes a look at the impact of the guidelines and what we have learned about their impact on organizational behavior. In this podcast, the Commission's General Counsel Kathleen Grilli identifies the three largest innovations of the Guidelines: Incentivizing self-policing by organizations Providing guidance on effective ethics and compliance programs Holding organizations accountable based on specific culpability factors when they commit offenses The approach has worked more successfully than had been imagined. As she notes, it has expanded beyond the criminal environment to encompass civil settlements with government agencies as well. In addition, the approach to compliance in the Guidelines has been embraced globally, with their outlines clearly visible in the laws of many nations. Within the US, she shares, a strong difference has emerged between organizations with and without compliance programs. The overwhelming majority of organizations convicted had no compliance program at all. In fact, only 11 out of approximately 5,000 organizations had a program that a court found to be effective. This points out that there is still room for improvement, particularly among smaller organizations who lack awareness of the need for and benefits of compliance programs. Listen in to learn more about the remarkable effectiveness of the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines.

Think you understand cryptocurrency? More important, do you understand what it means to your community financial institution? Probably not as well as this episode's guest, Lou Grilli, Sr. Innovation Specialist at PSCU. Host Josh DeTar dug deep as Grilli explained crypto and shared how it will revolutionize financial services. 

Mark Grilli, Chief Marketing Officer at CommerceHub shares his thoughts on the changing world of retail and gives insight on how to adapt from a marketing standpoint. Some key takeaways include:Marketers have to make it clear to customers why they should adapt to change Marketers need to gain executive support in order to help drive the change.It's essential to move fast and continuously question where you are. Marketers shouldn't rely on data alone; they need to know their customers, be creative and use their gut instincts.Marketers need to find the best way to gain insight into their customers' companies and to help sales communicate with them on a personal level.The future of marketing lies in a hybrid model with both remote and in-person events.Marketing leaders in the retail space will find Mark's experience invaluable. Understanding the changes in retail can help them adapt and gain a competitive advantage in the business.Website - https://www.commercehub.com/LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-grilli-7b5743/This episode is brought to you by Content Allies.Content Allies helps B2B tech companies launch revenue-generating podcasts. Build relationships that drive revenue through podcast networking. We schedule interviews with your ideal prospects and strategic partners so that you can build relationships & grow your business. You show up and have conversations, we handle everything else. Learn more at ContentAllies.com

Tobias hat schon mehr Sachen gemacht, als ich hier aufzählen könnte, aber seine große Liebe ist die Schriftgestaltung und sein Titel heute ist Account Director bei Grilli Type.(Foto: Hannah Schierholz, Forward Festival Wien 2021)

La portada de este número de La Montaña Rusa fue el nuevo disco de los neoyorkinos Out To Dinner, Episodes of Grace, publicado este 2022. Escuchamos también el trabajo del guitarrista brasileño afincado en Nueva York, Ricardo Grilli, a través de 1962, álbum publicado en 2020. Nuestra sección Clásico de la Semana fue ocupada este episodio por el saxofonista japonés Kohsuke Mine, del que escuchamos su primer trabajo como líder, First, publicado en 1970. Kike Arza y su Electric 4et nos visitaron en nuestra sección Jazz en Español, de los que escuchamos Invictos a la Fuerza, publicado este 2022 por Errabal Jazz. Luego descubrimos la música del guitarrista canadiense Dan Pitt que junto a su quinteto, publicó en 2021, este estupendo Wrongs. Y cerraremos con otro estupendo guitarrista, Giovanni Francesca, del que escuchamos Màrgo, publicado en 2020 para Auand Records. Que lo disfrutéis.

Più di 50 anni, era il 1966, iniziava l'avventura imprenditoriale della famiglia Grilli e di "Omas". Succedeva a Numana, Riviera del Conero, Marche. Partita come una piccola fabbrica di carpenteria inserita nel distretto degli strumenti musicali (fisarmoniche in particolare) di Castelfidardo, via via è diventata un'ultra tecnologica azienda metalmeccanica al servizio delle multinazionali. Oggi nello stabilimento di "Omas" lavorano uomini, donne e tanti robot. Il racconto del figlio del fondatore e attuale amministratore delegato, Marco Grilli.

Durante l'intervista di oggi (in versione integrale - tra gli episodi del podcast è presente la versione ridotta con i tratti salienti), resa possibile grazie alla collaborazione con Spriano Communication, avremo il piacere di interagire con tre figure apicali di CRW - Corporate Risk Watch - società specializzata in risk consulting che dal 2006 si occupa di due diligence reputazionali, investigazioni aziendali e gestione del rischio: Nicoletta Grilli e Sergio Sergi (Managing Director); Marcella Binda, (Senior Director). Esploreremo il grande tema della due diligence reputazionale e dei suoi processi, dalla gestione del rischio al fattore strategico, alle investigazioni aziendali. Attraverso le preziose indicazioni e suggerimenti di queste tre professionalita' aventi un ruolo fondamentale per le basi, la funzionalità e l'efficacia di CRW, apprenderemo quale sia l'ambito di applicazione delle strategie e dei metodi di questa realta' e i vantaggi per le fusioni e acquizioni aziendali, specie nei mercati internazionali.Impareremo a comprendere come l'intelligenza artificiale entri in gioco, connessa agli algoritmi specifici, e osserveremo la rivoluzione che l'applicazione di questi ultimi rappresenta.Scopriremo anche la grande importanza dell'utilizzo delle tecnologie, e di sistemi automatizzati nel settore di Risk Consulting; la mappatura dei legami tra le società e tra i vari soggetti e la conseguente messa in evidenza dei legami più a rischio o critici. Nonché come si ottenga il giusto equilibrio tra la tecnologia basata sull'intelligenza artificiale e quello che è il concreto lavoro umano. Ma non riveleremo altro. Vi accompagneremo in questo mondo ricco e affascinante, che costituisce un vero e proprio esemplare emblematico dell'immagine del nostro podcast. Scoprirete perché. Buon ascolto.

Durante l'intervista di oggi (in versione ridotta - tra gli episodi del podcast è presente la versione integrale per maggiori approfondimenti), resa possibile grazie alla collaborazione con Spriano Communication, avremo il piacere di interagire con tre figure apicali di CRW - Corporate Risk Watch - società specializzata in risk consulting che dal 2006 si occupa di due diligence reputazionali, investigazioni aziendali e gestione del rischio: Nicoletta Grilli e Sergio Sergi (Managing Director); Marcella Binda, (Senior Director). Esploreremo il grande tema della due diligence reputazionale e dei suoi processi, dalla gestione del rischio al fattore strategico, alle investigazioni aziendali. Attraverso le preziose indicazioni e suggerimenti di queste tre professionalita' aventi un ruolo fondamentale per le basi, la funzionalità e l'efficacia di CRW, apprenderemo quale sia l'ambito di applicazione delle strategie e dei metodi di questa realta' e i vantaggi per le fusioni e acquizioni aziendali, specie nei mercati internazionali.Impareremo a comprendere come l'intelligenza artificiale entri in gioco, connessa agli algoritmi specifici, e osserveremo la rivoluzione che l'applicazione di questi ultimi rappresenta.Scopriremo anche la grande importanza dell'utilizzo delle tecnologie, e di sistemi automatizzati nel settore di Risk Consulting; la mappatura dei legami tra le società e tra i vari soggetti e la conseguente messa in evidenza dei legami più a rischio o critici. Nonché come si ottenga il giusto equilibrio tra la tecnologia basata sull'intelligenza artificiale e quello che è il concreto lavoro umano. Ma non riveleremo altro. Vi accompagneremo in questo mondo ricco e affascinante, che costituisce un vero e proprio esemplare emblematico dell'immagine del nostro podcast. Scoprirete perché. Buon ascolto.

Kolbrún Björnsdóttir reis upp úr sófanum fyrir nokkrum árum og stundar nú útivist af kappi, m.a. með því að leiða verkefnið Kvennakraft sem fer af stað að nýju nú í byrjun árs. Kolla kíkti til okkar og sagði okkur frá. Í gær var athyglisverð frétt í Fréttablaðinu um að Danir hyggist lána fimm íslensk fornhandrit til Noregs en vilji þó ekki setja fordæmi um að láta fleiri slík af hendi rakna meðal annars af ótta við að Íslendingar krefjist þess þá að fá handritin heim í vörslu hér á landi. Starfandi er nefnd á milli landanna um framtíð íslensku handritanna sem verið hafa í Danmörku frá 17. öld. Til okkar kom Haraldur Bernharðsson, forstöðumaður Miðaldastofu Háskóla Íslands. Kennsla hófst aftur í Háskóla Íslands í vikunni en þar er stefnt að staðkennslu þrátt fyrir fjölda kórónuveirusmita. Við heyrðum í Jóni Atla Benediktssyni, rektor Háskólans, um önnina fram undan og áhrif faraldursins á nemendur og starfsfólk. Í gær tilkynnti Ólöf Helga Adolfsdóttir, varaformaður Eflingar, um framboð sitt til formanns. Það hefur gustað um Eflingu í vetur en Sólveig Anna Jónsdóttir sagði af sér embætti formanns í blálok október síðastliðins. Ólöf Helga var gestur okkar. Bændurnir Gróa Jóhannsdóttir og Arnaldur Sigurðsson á bænum Hlíðarenda í Breiðdal á Austurlandi þurftu að þola 14 klukkustunda rafmagnsleysi á mánudag og eru fyrir löngu orðin þreytt á því sem þau kalla diskórafmagn, en þau þurfa oft að glíma við skyndilegt rafmagnsleysi á bænum sem er slæmt, því hjónin stóla á rafmagn til að gefa sauðfénu og bærinn er kyntur með rafmagni og því verður afskaplega kalt í kotinu þegar lengi er rafmagnslaust. Við hringdum austur í Breiðdal og heyrðum í Gróu um aðstæður þeirra hjóna. Opnað hefur verið fyrir innsendingar til Íslensku tónlistarverðlaunanna sem að öllu óbreyttu verða afhent í mars. Gerðar hafa verið breytingar á verðlaunaflokkum söngvara, sem ekki eru lengur kyngreindir enda kynin ekki bara í steríó, eins og segir í tilkynningu frá verðlaunahátíðinni. Kristján Freyr Halldórsson framkvæmdastjóri Íslensku tónlistarverðlaunanna kíkti til okkar og sagði okkur allt um fyrirkomulag verðlaunanna í ár. Tónlist: Erla og Gréta - Ég á heiminn með þér. Corinne Bailey Rae - Put your records on. Ásgeir Trausti - Sunday drive. Júníus Meyvant - Ástarsæla. Pink og Nate Ruess - Just give me a reason. Mammút - The moon will never turn on me. Hjálmar og Prins Póló - Grillið inn. Stebbi og Eyfi - Helga. Post Malone - Only wanna be with you. Bríet - Sólblóm. Moses Hightower - Stundum.

Aðventan er yndislegur tími að mörgu leyti, en getur líka verið krefjandi. Oft gleymum við okkur í önnum og setjum heilsuna aftar í forgangsröðina þegar mikið er að gera, en einmitt þá er mikilvægt að sinna bæði andlegri og líkamlegri heilsu. Ferðafélag Íslands stendur í desember fyrir Aðventu- og brosgöngum þar sem fólk er hvatt til að hreyfa sig alla daga fram að jólum. Heiðrún Ólafsdóttir hjá Ferðafélaginu var á línunni og sagði okkur af þessu jákvæða framtaki. Alls bárust 1.118 umsóknir um 32 lóðir sem auglýstar voru í nýju hverfi í Þorlákshöfn á dögunum og því þarf að draga á milli áhugasamra. Mikil uppbygging hefur verið í bæjarfélaginu samhliða auknum áhuga fólks á að búa úti á landi og við heyrðum í Elliða Vignissyni, bæjarstjóra, um stöðu mála og framtíð sveitarfélagsins. Við ræddum við Þórólf Guðnason í þættinum. Nýtt frumvarp er komið í samráðsgátt sem miðar að því að sóttvarnarlæknir verði pólitískt skipaður en ekki lengur ráðinn af Landlækni eins og áður hefur verið. Við spurðum Þórólf hvað honum finnst um þessar hugmyndir og ræddum jafnframt við hann um stöðuna í faraldrinum og hvers megi vænta í sóttvarnaraðgerðum. Ný rannsókn bendir til þess að í skólakerfinu sé ekki nægilega góð þekking á þeim áföllum sem nemendur geta hafa orðið fyrir á lífsleiðinni og hvaða áhrif þau hafa á hegðan barna, framkomu og námsárangur. Karen Nóadóttir sálfræðingur á heiðurinn að þessari samantekt en hún ræðir hugmyndir um áfallamiðaða nálgun í skólakerfinu í fyrirlestri í Háskólanum á Akureyri í dag. Við hringdum norður í hana og veltum fyrir okkur þessari áhugaverðu greinargerð sem heitir einfaldlega Hvað kom fyrir þig? Mörg þeirra sem tekið hafa upp vegan lífstíl kvarta yfir því að erfitt sé að finna góða vegan osta, en nú stefnir íslenska fyrirtækið Livefood ehf. að því að framleiða hágæða innlenda plöntuafurða osta og nota til þess vistvæna orkugjafa við framleiðsluna. Erlendur Eiríksson er einn eigenda og stofnenda Livefood og verðandi grænkera ostagerðameistari. Hann leit við hjá okkur í spjall. Og íþróttir helgarinnar voru hér að vanda rétt fyrir klukkan níu. Af nógu var að taka þar sem hápunkturinn er væntanlega það að íslenska kvennalandsliðið í hópfimleikum gerði sér lítið fyrir og varð Evrópumeistari um helgina. Við spjöllum um sportið við Einar Örn Jónsson íþróttafréttamann. Tónlist: OMAM - Phantom. Harry Belafonte - Marys boy child. Post Malone - Only wanna be with you. Jónas Sig og Lúðrasveit Þorlákshafnar - Fortíðarþrá. Hjálmar og Prins Póló - Grillið inn. Hipsumhaps - Meikaða. Pogues og Ki

Alex Elliott is joined this week by the author, translator, and journalist Alda Sigmundsdóttir. Highlights this week include: parliament preparing, hospitals also preparing, and even cats preparing; as well as plenty more. Today's closing song is Grillið inn by Hjálmar and Prins Póló.

matteo è uno scrittore + padre della pagina culto pagliare (già pagliare shitposting) e questa è una puntata dedicata ai lati più oscuri/schifosi/mostruosi dell'animo umano.ho parlato con lui di piaceri proibiti, ASMR, nostalgia e del nostro essere profondamente acquario. a un certo punto abbiamo consigliato un cinepanettone a elon musk.[trilogia del peccato: 1 di 3]